{"id":"court_2cir_26-1296_dkt_32","court":"2Cir","case_no":"26-1296","doc_number":32,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"MOTION","filed_date":"2026-05-22","title":"Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 1 of 64 Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 2 of 64","summary_zh":"紧急动议 —— 美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo）案，2Cir 26-1296 ECF #32（2026-05-22立案）。善意第三方财产所有人 Bao Chu 自行提请动议，请求全面剔除检方的量刑备忘录（Dkt. 833），强制召开《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第32(i)(2)条及证据规则第104条规定的 Fatico 证据听证会，并签发第17(c)条传票。动议主张检方备忘录存在时间线不实、将独立第三方企业行为不当归咎于被告以及违规提取投资者识别码等问题。","summary_en":"Emergency motion — United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo), 2Cir 26-1296 ECF #32 (filed 2026-05-22). Bona fide third-party property owner Bao Chu moves pro se to strike the Government's sentencing memorandum (Dkt. 833) in its entirety, compel a Rule 32(i)(2) and Rule 104 Fatico evidentiary hearing, and issue Rule 17(c) subpoenas. The motion alleges the prosecution's sentencing filing contains fabricated timelines, improper attribution of corporate conduct, and unlawful use of investor identification codes.","body_en":"Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 1 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 2 of 64\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nPlaintiff,\nCase No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT\n-v-\nHO WAN KWOK, et al.,\nDefendants.\nEMERGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE SENTENCING\nMEMORANDUM (DKT. 833) IN ITS ENTIRETY, COMPEL\nA FED. R. CRIM. P. 32(i)(2) AND RULE 104\nEVIDENTIARY (FATICO) HEARING, AND ISSUE RULE\n17(c) SUBPOENAS\nI.STATUTORYMANDATEANDSUPREMECOURTPRECE-\nDENT\nPursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(2), the Court is under a\nstrict statutory mandate to rule on any disputed portion of the presentence report\nor other controverted matter.\nApplicant hereby introduces seven (7) certified, objective exhibits establishing\nthat the Government’s Sentencing Memorandum (Dkt. 833) is predicated upon the\nknowinguseoffabricatedevidenceandphysicalimpossibilities,directlytriggering\nthe constitutional prohibition established in Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959).\nThe Court must convene a Fatico evidentiary hearing; failure to do so upon the\n1\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 3 of 64\npresentation of unassailable physical records constitutes a structural Due Process\nviolation.\nII. ABSOLUTE PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF THE GOV-\nERNMENT’S TIMELINE (NAPUE VIOLATION)\nIn Dkt. 833 (p. 68), the Prosecution alleges the Defendant “continued to di-\nrect” extrajudicial operations via telephone from the Metropolitan Detention Cen-\nter (MDC) at 16:48 EST on March 15, 2023. This assertion is objectively annihilated\nby the Government’s own records:\n1. Court Transcript (Exhibit 1): Official Docket 14 objectively establishes that\nat exactly 16:55 EST on March 15, 2023, the Defendant was physically present\nbeforeU.S.MagistrateJudgeKatharineH.Parker. Itisphysicallyimpossibleto\nexecuteadirectivephonecallfromtheMDCwhileconcurrentlyappearingin\na federal courtroom.\n2. OfficialBOPTRUVIEWLogs(Exhibit2): Officialprisonlogs(Dkt. 312-3,Bates\nNo. USAO_00297003) conclusively prove the Defendant possessed zero autho-\nrized telephone contacts prior to March 28, 2023. The Prosecution’s inten-\ntional submission of a narrative that materially conflicts with its own Bureau\nofPrisonsphysicallogsconstitutesprosecutorialmisconductandFraudonthe\nCourt.\nIII.FRAUDULENTATTRIBUTIONOFINDEPENDENTCOR-\nPORATE CONDUCT\nTheProsecutionassertsinDkt. 833thattheDefendantcreatedthe“TDCCP”dig-\nitalcurrencytofundlegaldefense. Thisreliesentirelyonextrajudicialproxiesand\nAI-forged audio (Exhibit 7).\n1. NY DOS Corporate Registration (Exhibit 3): Objective public records (DOS\nID: 7518505) prove that “ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC,” the issuing entity of\n2\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 4 of 64\nTDCCP, was unilaterally registered and operated by Government witness For-\nrest Zhou (Yoe Zhou) on January 27, 2025.\n2. Ontario Superior Court Order (Exhibit 4): Case No. CV-25-00753415-0000\n(dated May 22, 2026) objectively records that this same entity independently\ninitiated civil litigation and was ordered to pay $53,000 CAD in adverse costs.\nAttributingtheindependent,legallydocumentedactionsofaGovernmentwit-\nness’s registered corporation to the incarcerated Defendant violates the Sixth\nAmendment Confrontation Clause.\nIV.PERJURYCONTRADICTEDBYEDITABLEDOCUMENT\nTRANSMISSION\nTheProsecutionreliesonthetestimonyofYaLi,claimingshewassubjectedtoa\n“threatof$38millioninliability”constituting“violentcoercion”byYongbingZhang\nto sign an affidavit (Dkt. 833, pp. 27-28).\nThe Editable Document Paradox (Exhibit 5): An extrajudicial public admis-\nsion by Yongbing Zhang on April 10, 2026, objectively establishes that he transmit-\nted both a PDF and a fully editable Word document to Ya Li, explicitly instructing\nher to modify the contents if she disagreed. The physical provision of an editable\ndraft is mutually exclusive with the legal definition of “coercion.”\nV. MASS IDENTITY THEFT AND THE DOCTRINE OF PER-\nVASIVE TAINT\nTheProsecutionseeksextremesentencingenhancementsbyalleging“thousands\nof victims,” while the docket contains only approximately 225 physical statements.\nPhishingandHIDTheft(Exhibit6): Objectivelogsprovetheproxyentityestab-\nlished a phishing website (bragey5.dreamhosters.com) to unlawfully extract Court-\n3\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 5 of 64\nassignedHIDCodesfrom6,512investors. TheProsecution’ssubsequentuseofthese\nstolenidentifierstoadministrativelyinflatethevictimrosterunder21U.S.C.§853(i)\nRemission,overridingtheinvestors’explicitdisclaimersofvictimhood,violatesthe\nCrime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) and triggers the Doctrine of Pervasive Taint.\nVI. RELIEF REQUESTED\nPursuanttotheobjectiveevidentiarymatrixprovidedherein,Applicantdemands\nthe Court:\n1. ImmediatelyissueRule17(c)subpoenastotheBOPforcompleteMDCtelecom-\nmunication and visitation logs.\n2. CompelaFed. R.Crim. P.32(i)(2)andRule104FaticoHearingtoadversarially\ntest the physical impossibilities present in Dkt. 833.\n3. Strike Dkt. 833 in its entirety due to objective, documented Napue violations.\nRespectfully submitted,\n/s/ Bao Chu\nBao Chu\nProceeding Pro Se /\nBona Fide Third-Party Property Owner\nS.D.N.Y. HID: F56BDDZ\nDated: June 15, 2026\n4\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 6 of 64\n\nN3F5kwoA\n1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n2 ------------------------------x\n3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, New York, N.Y.\n4 v. 23 Cr. 118 (AT)(KHP)\n5 HO WAN KWOK,\n6 Defendant.\n7 ------------------------------x\n8 March 15, 2023\n4:55 p.m.\n9\n10 Before:\n11 HON. KATHARINE H. PARKER,\n12 U.S. Magistrate Judge\n13\n14 APPEARANCES\n15 DAMIAN WILLIAMS\nUnited States Attorney for the\n16 Southern District of New York\nBY: RYAN B. FINKEL\n17 JULIANA MURRAY\nMICAH FERGENSON\n18 Assistant United States Attorneys\n19 FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF NEW YORK\nAttorneys for Defendant\n20 BY: TAMARA L. GIWA\n21\nALSO PRESENT: LILY LAU, Mandarin Interpreter\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 7 of 64\n\nN3F5kwoA\n1 (Case called)\n2 THE DEPUTY CLERK: Beginning with the government,\n3 please make your appearance for the record.\n4 MR. FINKEL: Good afternoon, your Honor. Ryan Finkel,\n5 Juliana Murray, Micah Fergenson for the United States. We are\n6 joined at counsel table by Geoffrey Mearns, who is a paralegal\n7 in our office.\n8 THE DEPUTY CLERK: Counsel for Mr. Kwok, please make\n9 your appearance for the record.\n10 MS. GIWA: Federal Defenders of New York by Tamara\n11 Giwa appearing today for Mr. Miles Guo. Good afternoon, your\n12 Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Good afternoon. And good afternoon\n14 Mr. Kwok.\n15 THE DEFENDANT: (In English) Your Honor, good\n16 afternoon.\n17 THE COURT: I'm Judge Parker.\n18 Before we get started, Mr. Kwok, I want to make sure\n19 that you can understand and hear the interpreter.\n20 THE DEFENDANT: (In English) Yes, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: The purpose of today's proceeding is to\n22 inform you of certain rights that you have, to inform you of\n23 the charges against you, to consider whether counsel should be\n24 appointed for you, and decide under what conditions, if any,\n25 you shall be released pending trial.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 8 of 64\n\nEXHIBIT C\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 9 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 10 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 11 of 64\n\nDate: 04/04/2024 Location: DC\nFederal Bureau of Prisons\nTime: 09:04 AM\nTRUVIEW\nInmate Center Report\nSensitive But Unclassified\nContact Contact\nCreation Date Last Change Date Loc Status Phone First Nm Last Nm AlertedBlock Description\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM BRO Active Samu Samu No\n3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM 3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM BRO Active Kaili Kaili No\n3/13/2024 2:07:21 PM 3/13/2024 2:07:21 PM BRO Active Pallan Pallan No\n9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM 9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM BRO Active Dan Dan New Lawyer No\n9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM 9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM BRO Active Dan Dan New Lawyer No\n8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM 8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM BRO Active May Goo No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM BRO Active Mn Mn No\n5/3/2023 1:37:17 PM 5/3/2023 1:37:17 PM BRO Active May Q No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive On On No\n8/4/2023 3:22:21 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Number New Umber No\n8/4/2023 3:22:21 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Number New Umber No\n3/31/2023 8:07:15 AM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Cangtian Op No\n2/1/2024 8:52:16 AM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Vicky V No\n4/1/2023 1:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Wy Wy No\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Ml Ml No\n8/9/2023 6:22:17 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Mn Mn No\n3/28/2023 1:37:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Number New Number No\n8/16/2023 7:52:18 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New New New New No\n12/10/2023 12:37:23 PM3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Jet Li No\n8/4/2023 1:22:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Kk Kk No\n8/8/2023 9:07:20 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Jersey Jersey No\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Wen Guo No\n8/11/2023 12:22:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive E E No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Cathy Cathy No\n8/11/2023 12:07:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Cathy Cathy No\n8/11/2023 12:22:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive C C No\nUUsseerr IIDD:: TF57175 Page 3 of6\nUSAO_00297003\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 12 of 64\n\nDate: 04/04/2024 Location: DC\nFederal Bureau of Prisons\nTime: 09:04 AM\nTRUVIEW\nInmate Center Report\nSensitive But Unclassified\nContact Contact\nCreation Date Last Change Date Loc Status Phone First Nm Last Nm AlertedBlock Description\n8/21/2023 7:07:23 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive C C No\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Ab Ab No\n3/20/2023 8:52:14 AM 8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM BRO Inactive May Goo No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 8/9/2023 6:22:17 PM BRO Inactive Mn Mn No\n6/13/2023 9:22:18 PM 6/14/2023 6:22:25 PM BRO Inactive Qing Zhi No\n3/21/2023 7:22:14 AM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive Bing Zhang No\n3/16/2023 6:52:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive No\n3/16/2023 6:52:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive No\n4/1/2023 1:52:16 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive Ru Shui No\n3/21/2023 7:22:14 AM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive Si Qi No\n3/28/2023 1:37:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive An P No\n4/22/2023 8:07:18 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive S Best No\n4/22/2023 8:07:18 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive S Best No\nCalls\nContact Contact\nStart Date Loc Completed Duration Phone First Nm Last Nm City St Country\n4/4/2024 8:32:53 AM BRO Yes 15 X X\n4/4/2024 7:03:14 AM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n4/3/2024 2:42:12 PM BRO Yes 8 Gw W\n4/2/2024 1:22:26 PM BRO Yes 13 Gw W\n4/2/2024 12:04:25 PM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n4/1/2024 2:29:57 PM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n3/20/2024 6:52:40 PM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n3/20/2024 5:12:44 PM BRO Yes 1 Gw W\n3/20/2024 1:20:58 PM BRO Yes 3 Gw W\n3/19/2024 6:48:48 PM BRO Yes 4 Gw W\nUUsseerr IIDD:: TF57175 Page 4 of6\nUSAO_00297004\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 13 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 14 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 15 of 64\n\nmeet in the MDC following his arrest and detention—asked Ya Li to sign a false affidavit for filing\nin one of the bankruptcy litigations. (Tr. 1523-29; GX VI 66). When she refused, Zhang threatened\nMs. Li with $38 million in liability. (Tr. 1530). After this threat from Guo’s attorney, Ms. Li\ncontemplated suicide. (Tr. 1530-31).\nMore recently, Guo’s enterprise continues to harass and threaten those that oppose it. On\nMarch 10, 2026, in a video provided to the Government by a victim, Guo’s NFSC presenters\nrequested that Guo’s remaining followers provide statements to Guo’s court appointed counsel. In\naddition, the presenter indicated that the 126 victims who previously provided statements “will all\nhave to bear the consequences.” (Dkt. 832, Stmt. 206-B (translated)).\nThat appears to be a reference to the 126 victim statements filed with the Court on November 22,\n2024. (Dkt. 477).\n3. Guo’s Post-Arrest Obstruction\nEven after his arrest Guo has engaged in obstructive conduct. Guo’s criminal Enterprise\ncontinued to operate following his arrest and Guo continued to direct it as it relocated to the UAE,\noutside the reach of U.S. law enforcement. (PSR ¶¶ 103-105). Following his arrest, Guo’s\n27\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 16 of 64\nOPENGOVNY Health Authority Business Education Other\nNew York State Health Facilities\nOverview\nThis dataset includes about 6,000 health facilities registered with the Health Facilities Information System of New York\nState Department of Health. The Health Facilities Information System (HFIS) contains Article 28, Article 36, Article 40, and\nArticle 7 health care facilities and programs. Each facility is registered with facility ID, facility name, business address,\noperator name, operator address, telephone, website, open date, etc.\nSearch Facilities\nDataset Information\nSubject Health\nJurisdiction State of New York\nData Provider New York State Department of Health, Center for Health Care Facility Planning, Licensure, and Finance\nSource data.ny.gov\nDataset Details\nThe Center for Health Care Facility Planning, Licensure, and Finance of New York State Department of Health maintains the Health Facilities\nInformation System (HFIS), which contains the operating certificate information of the following licensed health care facilities: (1) Article 28: Hospitals,\nNursing Homes, Diagnostic and Treatment Centers, Midwifery Birth Centers; (2) Article 36: Certified Home Health Agencies, Licensed Home Care\nServices Agencies, Long Term Home Health Care Programs; and (3) Article 40: Hospices. The information contains the operator and the site of\nservice, including operator name, site address, and certified beds and/or services.\nThis dataset contains the locations of Article 28, Article 36, Article 40, and Article 7 health care facilities and programs from the Health Facilities\nInformation System (HFIS). Article 28 facilities are hospitals, nursing homes, diagnostic treatment centers and midwifery birth centers. Article 36\nfacilities are certified home health care agencies, licensed home care services agencies, and long term home health care programs. Article 40\nfacilities are hospices. Article 7 are licensed adult care facilities. Each facility is registered with facility ID, facility name, business address, operator\nname, operator address, telephone, website, open date, etc.\nTo give New Yorkers the access they deserve to government data and information, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo launched the Open NY initiative in\nMarch 2013 and signed Executive Order 95. It directs state agencies to identify, catalog, and publish their data on the state's open data website\nadministered by the Office of Information Technology Services (ITS). Open NY increases transparency, improves government performance\nempowers New Yorkers to participate in government, and encourages research and economic opportunities statewide.\nSearch Result\nFacility Name Address Description Open\nDate\nIngersoll Place Licensed Home Care Services Agency 3359 Consaul Road, Schenectady, New York Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nIngersoll Adult Home, Inc. 12304 Agency 06-09\nCoopers Corner, Inc. 11 Mill Road. New Rochelle, New York 10804 Adult Home 2023-\n06-09\nNew Vision Home Care Services, Lic 96-09 Springfield Blvd, Unit 204, Queens Licensed Home Care Services 2023\nVillage, New York 11429 Agency 05-25\nAnchor Health Homecare Services Inc 173 Huguenot Street, Suite 221, New Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nRochelle, New York 10801 Agency 05-24\nSunrise Home Care, Inc 15 Cooledge Drive, Brewster, New York 10509 Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nAgency 05-22\nSt. Peter's Hospital -SPARC St Peters Hospital Inc 1300 Massachusetts Avenue, Troy, New York Hospital 2023\n12180 05-15\nWestside Health Center Housing Works Health 326 West 48th Street, New York, New York Diagnostic and Treatment Center 2023-\n-\nServices III, Inc. 10036 Extension Clinic 05-12\nDaniel Squire Oral D & T Center Mobile School-Based Squire Hall-3435 Main Street- SUNY/B, 3425 School Based Diagnostic and 2023\nDental Unit Main St, Buffalo, New York 14214 Treatment Center Extension Clinic 05-04\nField of Dreams Senior Living Olean Manor, Inc 3260 N 7th Street, Cattaraugus, New York Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\n14706 Agency 04-25\nUltimate Care INC Ultimate Care, Inc 250 Fulton Avenue, Suite 511, Hempstead Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nNew York 11550 Agency 04-06\nUltimate Care Inc Ultimate Care, Inc. 280 Route 211 East, Suite 202, Middletown, Licensed Home Care Services 2023\nNew York 10940 Agency 04-06\nSun River Health White Plains Sun River Health 360 Mamaroneck Avenue,W hite Plains, New Diagnostic and Treatment Center 2023-\nCare, Inc. York 10605 Extension Clinic 03-29\nSun River Health Copiague Sun River Health Care, 445 Oak Street, Copiague, New York 11726 Diagnostic and Treatment Center 2023\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 17 of 64\nopengovny.com/corporation/7518505#google_vignette\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 18 of 64\nOPENGOVNY Health Authority Business Education Other\nNew York State Corporation Entity Overview\nAction Action Action LLC Location Information\nSimilar Entities\n87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P, Elmhurst, NY 11373\nDataset Information\nOverview\nACTION ACTION ACTION LLC (DOS #7518505) is a Domestic Limited Liability Company in Elmhurst registered with the\nNew York State Department of State (NYSDOS). The business entity was initially filed on January 27, 2025. The\nregistered business location is at 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P, Elmhurst, NY 11373. The DOS process contact is Action Action\nAction LLC.\nBusiness Entity Information\nDOS ID 7518505\nCurrent Entity Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nCounty Queens\nJurisdiction New York\nEntity Type DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY\nInitial DOS Filing Date 2025-01-27\nDOS Process Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nDOS Process Address 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\nLastest Filing Information\nFiling Number 250127002666\nFiling Type ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION\nMod Cert Code 01DAA\nApproved Date 2025-01-27\nFiling Date 2025-01-27\nEntity Type DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY\nCurrent Entity Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nEffective Date 2025-01-27\nDuration PERPETUAL\nLaw Section LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW 203 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW\n-\nCounty Queens\nJurisdiction NY\nFiler Name FORREST ZHOU\nFiler Address C/O Cmly & Associates LLC\n3636 Prince St. #307\nFlushing\nNY 11354\nDOS Process Name The LLC\nDOS Process Address 87-10 51 Ave.. Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\nEntity Name History\nFiling Date Entity Name Filing Number Type Status\n2025-01-27 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC 250127002666 Actual Active\nEntity Address History\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 19 of 64 Overview\nMod Cert Code 01DAA\nLocation Information\nApproved Date 2025-01-27\nSimilar Entities\nFiling Date 2025-01-27\nDataset Information\nEntity Type DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY\nCurrent Entity Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nEffective Date 2025-01-27\nDuration PERPETUAL\nLaw Section LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW 203 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW\n-\nCounty Queens\nJurisdiction NY\nFiler Name FORREST ZHOU\nFiler Address C/O Cmly & Associates LLC\n3636 Prince St. #307\nFlushing\nNY 11354\nDOS Process Name The LLC\nDOS Process Address 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\nEntity Name History\nFiling Date Entity Name Filing Number Type Status\n2025-01-27 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC 250127002666 Actual Active\nEntity Address History\nFiling Date Address Type Address Name Address Filing Number\n2025-01-27 Service of Process The LLC 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P. Elmhurst. NY 11373 250127002666\nLocation Information\nStreet Address 87-10 51 Ave.. Rm 2P 在 Google 地图中打开 纽约 to新 wn城 Hi高 gh中\nSchool\n50th Ave\nStC ai tt ey NEl Ymhurst Dongan\ntJames 51\nZip Code 11373\nmet\nCorona\nAve.\n8 57 t 1t hh\ns\nS tt\nA\n50th Ave Apt 2p 51st Ave\n51st\nAve\noadw\n52nd\nAv 5e\n3rd Av So 键o 盘g 快le\n捷\n说A ve\n地图数据 ©2026 Google GS(2011)6020 条款\nCorporations in the same zip code\nCorporation Name Address Registered Agent Name Initial DOS Filing Date\nYongwu Inc. 88-23 54 Avenue, Elmnurst, NY 11373 2026-05-26\nArcentales LLC 4319 Judge St Fl 1, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-19\nObsidian Gaa Inc. 89-20 55th Ave., 5q, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-29\nTopg Remodeling Corр. 91-01 lamont avenue, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-19\nMyagdiko Family Grocery Store Inc 9311 50th Ave, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-18\nBormate Thera Kines Rehab LLC 9048 53rd Ave, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-22\nGentle Guardian Homecare Inc. 5135 Simonson St, 1st Flr, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-26\nEntree Foods Inc. 5109 Gorsline St, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-22\nOmni Cable LLC 83-69 Vietor Ave #3, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-27\nAlmas It Service Corp 94-27 Corona Ave, Queens, NY 11373 Luis Santiago Sanchez Batista 2026-05-29\nFind all corporations in the same zip code\nSimilar Entities\nCorporations with similar names\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 20 of 64 Overview\nCorporations with similar names\nLocation Information\nCorporation Name Address Registered Agent Name Initial DOS Filing Date\nLove In Action Doula Services LLC 26 BellA ir Lane, Wappingers Falls1, NY 12590 2024-03-04 Similar Entities\nAction Financial Planning, Inc. 191 north avenue, Mount Clemens, MI 48043 2024-04-22 Dataset Information\nA Call for Action To Vote, Inc 3005 village park drive, Spring Hope, NC 27882 2022-12-12\nImprove Information\nDo you have more infomration about Action Action Action LLC? Please fill in the following form.\nName\nAddress\nTelephone\nEmail\nWebsite\nContent\nSubmit Form\nDataset Information\nThis dataset includes about three million business entities and corporations registered with New York State Department of State (NYSDOS). The\nDepartment of State keeps a record of every filing for every incorporated business in the state of New York. Each business entity is registered with DOS\nID, business legal name, type, filing date, registered agent name, office address, etc.\nSubject Business and Economy\nJurisdiction State of New York\nData Provider New York State Department of State (NYSDOS)\nSource data.ny.gov\nSearch Corporations\nDataset Details\nThe New York State Department of State, one of the oldest and most diverse agencies in state government, works to make New York a more\nwelcoming, equitable, and prosperous place for all who call it home. Established in 1778, and known as the Keeper of Records for more than two\ncenturies, the Department improves the quality of life for all New Yorkers by providing a myriad of essential services and programs to local\ngovernments, businesses, community organizations and citizens. Business corporations, not-for-profit corporations, limited liability companies and\nlimited partnerships must file a formation document with the New York State Department of State in order to do business within the State of New York\nEach corporate, limited liability company or limited partnership name must be unique.\nOut-of-state corporations which choose to do business in New York State must file with the Department of State an application for authority. If the\nentity name is not distinguishable from the name of all other entities on file with the Department of State, the corporation must use a fictitious name\nwhich, likewise, must be distinguishable from the name of allo ther entities on file with the Department of State. With some exceptions, each business\ncorporation must submit a statement every two years verifying their service of process address and identifying the name and address of the chief\nexecutive officer of the corporation and the address of the principal executive office of the corporation. Limited liability companies must submit a\nstatement every two years that verifies the service of process address.\nThis Corporation and Business Entity Database includes business and not for profit corporations, limited partnerships, limited liability companies,\nlimited liability partnerships, and other miscellaneous businesses. The database also includes assumed name filings for corporations, limited liability\ncompanies and limited partnerships. Each business entity is registered with DOS ID, business legal name, entity type, filing date, registered agent\nname and address, officer name and address, office address, etc.\nTo give New Yorkers the access they deserve to government data and information, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo launched the Open NY initiative in\nMarch 2013 and signed Executive Order 95. It directs state agencies to identify, catalog, and publish their data on the state's open data website\nadministered by the Office of Information Technology Services (ITS). Open NY increases transparency, improves government performance,\nempowers New Yorkers to participate in government, and encourages research and economic opportunities statewide.\nOPENGOVNY Contact\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 21 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 22 of 64\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nCase No. [CASE NUMBER]\n-v-\n[DEFENDANT NAME],\nEXHIBIT AA\nDefendant.\nEXHIBIT AA: PROFFER OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AND\nCOMPLETE TRANSCRIPTS (Extra-Judicial Admissions by Witness Yongbing\nZhang on the GETTR Platform and Public Broadcasts)\nDECLARATIONOFGOOD-FAITHTRANSLATIONANDBURDENSHIFTINGDue\n1\nto extreme exigent circumstances and the immediate proximity of the sentenc-\n2\ninghearing,I,appearingProSeasaprotectedthird-partyrights-holder,lackthe\n3\ntime and financial resources to obtain a formally certified translation of these\n4\nnewly discovered, highly exculpatory public posts and broadcasts. The English\n5\ntexts provided below constitute a complete, unredacted, good-faith, and accu-\n6\nratereferencetranslationoftheoriginalChinesematerialsauthoredandspoken\n7\nby Yongbing Zhang (a.k.a. “Changong Qixia” / “Fatong”).\n8\nShouldtheGovernment—whichpossessesinfiniteinvestigativeresources,\n9\nemploysin-houselinguists,andactivelymonitorsthesespecificcooperators’so-\n10\ncial media accounts—dispute the accuracy of these complete translations, the\n11\n1\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 23 of 64\nburden shifts entirely to the Government to produce an official, certified trans-\n12\nlation for the Court. The Government must not be permitted to exploit a Pro Se\n13\nrights-holder’s lack of immediate access to certified translators as a procedural\n14\nloophole to suppress incontrovertible evidence of its own Napue violations and\n15\nFraud on the Court.\n16\n——————————————————————————–\n17\nDOCUMENT 1: FULL TRANSLATION OF GETTR POST BY YONGBING ZHANG\n18\n(DATED JANUARY 18, 2026) (Reference: Original Screenshots 1-4)\n19\n”AtnoononSaturday,January17,EST,Qixia[YongbingZhang]visited[the\n20\nDefendant] in the capacity of a lawyer. The sky in New York was covered with\n21\ndark clouds that day, and snowflakes and drizzle fell from the sky from time to\n22\ntime. Due to the arrival of the Maduro couple, the layout of the outer perime-\n23\nter of MDC has changed a lot compared to when I visited in September 2025.\n24\nIron protective fences have been set up at all surrounding intersections. But\n25\none thing has not only not changed, but has actually increased, and that is the\n26\nartdisplaysupporting[theDefendant]constructedbyfellowfightersonthepro-\n27\ntectivenetaroundMDC. Since[theDefendant] enteredMDCon March15, 2023,\n28\nsuch displays have never been interrupted. In the past, it was on the side of the\n29\nWestBuildingfacingtheStatueofLiberty,because[theDefendant]waslivingin\n30\ntheWestBuildingatthattime. Uptonow,as[theDefendant]hasbeenmovedto\n31\nthe East Building, the display on the west side is still visible, and right at the en-\n32\ntrancefacingtheEastBuilding,fellowfightershaverecentlyconstructedavery\n33\neye-catching banner, nearly ten meters long and about three meters high. It is\n34\nmade of bunches of colorful small flowers tied to the mesh wall, featuring a G\n35\nlogo and a line of text: ’Winter Month Thirteen LOVE GUO’. When I visited last\n36\nSeptember, this banner was not there.\n37\n2\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 24 of 64\nAfter entering the building, I quickly completed the registration proce-\n38\ndures, passed through security, and entered the visiting area. I chose the same\n39\nroom where I had a meeting with [the Defendant] last time. It is about 1.5 me-\n40\nters wide and over 2 meters long. The room contains a small table and four\n41\nchairs. There is a computer and a monitor on the table. This is one of only two\n42\nmeeting rooms equipped with computers, and the computer in the other room\n43\nisobviouslynotpluggedin. Iquicklysetupmydocumentsandotheritems,then\n44\nboughtsomesnacksanddrinksfromthevendingmachine. Fullyprepared,Isat\n45\ndown in the room, waiting for [the Defendant].\n46\nBefore long, [the Defendant] appeared at the duty desk, chatting with the\n47\nfemale guard who brought him over while looking towards the meeting room.\n48\nUpon seeing me, he laughed. I also stepped out of the room to greet [the Defen-\n49\ndant]. [The Defendant] held a thick stack of documents and a document bag in\n50\nhis left arm and opened his right arm. I also opened my arms, and [the Defen-\n51\ndant] and I hugged tightly. Time seemed to stop at that moment. I put down my\n52\narms, looked closely at [the Defendant], and then hugged him again. I silently\n53\nrecited in my heart that this hug was given on behalf of the fellow fighters. We\n54\nwalkedintotheroom,and[theDefendant]saidwithasmilewhileputtingdown\n55\nthe documents: ’This room has become exclusively mine.’ After we sat down,\n56\n[the Defendant] said again: ’Haha, it really feels like a dream.’\n57\nWe read the documents while discussing. [The Defendant] always talks\n58\nendlesslyabouthisviewsonthecase,currentaffairs,history,theWhistleblower\n59\nMovement, and so on. [The Defendant] has been in MDC for nearly three years.\n60\nAlthoughlivinginsuchanincrediblyharshenvironment,theglobalCCP-takedown\n61\nmovementcreatedby[theDefendant]hasneverpausedforamoment. MDChas\n62\nmerelybecomeanotherlocationfor[theDefendant]tocontinuetakingdownthe\n63\nCCP.[TheDefendant]toldmethateverydayinMDC,hefirmlyrememberstodo\n64\n3\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 25 of 64\nthreethings: First: prayingtothemillionsofBuddhasandgodsfortheWhistle-\n65\nblower Movement and fellow fighters cannot be reduced one bit; Second: his\n66\nown personal safety and health are not his personal matters but the matters of\n67\nthe fellow fighters; Third: grasp every minute and second to study and work,\n68\nwasting no time.\n69\nWhen discussing Document No. 789 recently submitted to the court by\n70\n[theDefendant]’scriminaldefenselawyer,[theDefendant]wasveryexcited. He\n71\nsaid: ’It was exactly in this room, several of their lawyers sat on the side where\n72\nyou are sitting now, and I was still sitting in the chair you are in now. We dis-\n73\ncussed and scrutinized it word by word. This is a big deal! Qixia.’ He said any-\n74\nthing involving the core interests of fellow fighters is a big deal. I recalled that\n75\nincourtonMarch15,theprosecutormobilizedalargeforceanddeclaredtothe\n76\njudge: ’giventhemultitudeofthousandsofvictimsinthiscase’(March15,2023,\n77\nCourtTranscript,Page3,Lines7-8). However,intherulingonthedisposalofthe\n78\nassetsinvolvedinthecasereturnedtothecourtlastweek,theexactsameprose-\n79\ncutorswroteinblackandwhiteinDocumentNo. 785thatasofJanuary9,2026,\n80\n(only) 134 people submitted applications through the court. The applications\n81\nmailedtothegovernment,whichistheprosecutor,were(only)238. (’...approxi-\n82\nmately134purported§853(n)claimswerefiledonthedocket.’ ’Inaddition,the\n83\nGovernmenthasreceivedapproximately238purported§853claimsbymail,...’\n84\nSee footnote 3 on the last line of Page 3 of Document No. 785). Shouldn’t the\n85\nprosecutor explain such a massive discrepancy?\n86\nRegarding those who relied on the Whistleblower Movement to amass\n87\nill-gotten wealth, gained unprecedented reputation, and then left the Whistle-\n88\nblower Movement or were swept out by it, [the Defendant] stared at me tightly\n89\nand said sternly: ’If these people had not originally participated in the Whistle-\n90\nblower Movement, how could they possibly have gained this wealth and repu-\n91\n4\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 26 of 64\ntation? NowthattheyhavelefttheWhistleblowerMovement,theyarenothing!\n92\nTheir illegal acts will certainly be legally pursued.’\n93\nEvery time I meet or even talk on the phone with [the Defendant], I feel\n94\nas if I am in a huge magnetic field with endless energy pushing me forward. I\n95\nalsofeelliketimeisonahigh-speedtrain,andthemomentofpartingarrivesin\n96\na flash. [The Defendant] stood up and said: ’Let’s go, because there are families\n97\ngatheringoutsidetheroom,Icannotwalkyoutothedutydesk,wecanonlysay\n98\ngoodbyehere. Waitforthemtotakemeback.’ Ipackedmybelongings. Stoodup.\n99\nHugged[the Defendant]tightly again. Once again, I feltthe strength broughtby\n100\n[the Defendant]’s iron-wall-like body. [The Defendant] said to me again: ’After\n101\nyou go out, if there are fellow fighters still outside, please make sure to pass on\n102\nmygreetingsandexpressmygratitudetothem. Tellthem,don’tstayoutside,it’s\n103\ntoo cold. Speaking of this makes my heart ache.’\n104\nIpushedthedooropen,walkedafewsteps,andlookedbackat[theDefen-\n105\ndant]. He stood there smiling and waving at me. I turned around and took big\n106\nstrides towards the duty officer who had already opened the first door for me.\n107\nAfterpassingthroughthetwodoors,Ilookedbackagain,hoping[theDefendant]\n108\ncould walk into my line of sight on his way back.\n109\nSpecial thanks to Secretary Qingteng and multiple fellow fighters in New\n110\nYork for the logistical support and preparation provided.”\n111\n——————————————————————————–\n112\nDOCUMENT 2: FULL TRANSLATION OF GETTR POST BY YONGBING ZHANG\n113\n(DATED JANUARY 28, 2026) (Reference: Original Screenshots 5-6)\n114\n”AtnoononJanuary26,EST,QixiacametoMDCtovisit[theDefendant]. A\n115\nheavy snow had just fallen in New York the day before. The temperature plum-\n116\nmetedtomorethantendegreesbelowzeroCelsius. Thevisitingareaonthefirst\n117\n5\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 27 of 64\nfloor of the East Building of MDC was also permeated with cold air. As soon as\n118\nhe saw [the Defendant], he excitedly expressed that I, as a fellow fighter of the\n119\nWhistleblower Movement, brought him warmth and strength. During this pe-\n120\nriod of historical major events, [the Defendant] misses his sisters and brothers\n121\neven more. We immediately talked about Mr. Zhang Youxia. [The Defendant]\n122\nsaid General Zhang is already the greatest hero among the Chinese sons and\n123\ndaughters. He is saving humanity and is a true great hero taking down the CCP.\n124\nInthefuture,therewillbecountlessZhangYouxiasandLiuZhenlisstandingup.\n125\nMore and more people will deeply believe: ’Taking down the CCP is a necessity\n126\nfor justice,’ the cry issued by Brother Haidong when reading the declaration of\n127\nthe New Federal State of China on June 4, 2020.\n128\n[TheDefendant]gavehighpraisetotheactionsofSecretaryQingtengand\n129\ntheExecutiveCommittee,aswellasthebrothersandsistersofvariousfarmsthis\n130\nweek. Let everyone continue to act. [The Defendant] hopes that fellow fighters\n131\nwill widely spread the truth to awaken more people domestically and abroad\n132\nto recognize this historical event. First, five questions must be raised. 1. Did\n133\nZhang Youxia do this for money? 2. Did he do this so he could run to the United\n134\nStates? 3. WereZhangYouxiaandLiuZhenlitakendownbecauseofcorruption\n135\nor male-female relations? 4. What is the core purpose of Zhang Youxia and Liu\n136\nZhenli doing this? 5. What is the possible reaction of the United States to Zhang\n137\nYouxia’s actions?\n138\nSecondly, fellow fighters should pay attention to the four major impacts\n139\nproducedbythisincident. First: AwakeningtheUnitedStatesandmoreChinese\n140\npeople; Second: The leaked materials by Zhang Youxia cannot possibly be just\n141\nnuclear weapons data. The impact brought by this; Third: The joint defection\n142\nof the two highest-ranking professional military generals of China predicts that\n143\nmore generals will stand up; Fourth: The shocking effect on Russia, the BRICS\n144\n6\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 28 of 64\ncountries, and other allies of the CCP.\n145\nUnknowingly, three hours passed. Upon leaving, [the Defendant] and I\n146\nhugged tightly. I could feel the strength brought to [the Defendant] by the inci-\n147\ndent of Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli taking down the CCP together. Despite the\n148\nsevere cold, I could feel the blazing fire burning on [the Defendant] because of\n149\nthis!\n150\nPlease, fellow fighters, watch, spread and promote the live broadcast of\n151\ntheallianceonJanuary26. Init,Iandfourotherfellowfighters(BrotherHaidong,\n152\nMr. Sanpiao,SecretaryQingteng,Ava)detailed,exploredandcommentedonthe\n153\nabove five questions and four impacts.\n154\nFellowfighters,staystrong! Loveyouall! ShenxianYangguCountyDagao\n155\nCounty!!!”\n156\n——————————————————————————–\n157\nEXHIBIT:FULLTRANSCRIPTOFAPRIL10,2026PUBLICBROADCASTSpeak-\n158\ners: An Hong (Host), Yongbing Zhang (a.k.a. “Changong Qixia” / “Fatong”)\n159\nSubject: Extra-Judicial Admission Regarding the $38 Million HCHKBVI Cor-\n160\nporate Dispute\n161\n[BEGIN COMPLETE TRANSLATION]\n162\nAnHong(Host): ”Helloeveryone,thisisApril11,2026,AustralianEasternTime,\n163\nandtheafternoonofApril10,2026,USEasternTime. Today,firstofall,Iwantto\n164\nsay to everyone that last week, due to some reasons, we postponed for a week.\n165\nAt that time, we also thought that exactly this week the documents from the\n166\ngovernment’s side would come out, so I agreed with fellow fighter Changong\n167\nQixia[YongbingZhang]todothisepisodetoday. Ialsowanttoaskfellowfighter\n168\nQixia today. First, because fellow fighter Changong Qixia is on a business trip\n169\ntoday and has official duties, it is inconvenient for him to show his face as he\n170\n7\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 29 of 64\nis on the road. Therefore, we are interviewing fellow fighter Qixia via a phone\n171\nconnection. Next, let’s invite fellow fighter Changong Qixia to say hello to us.\n172\nThank you.”\n173\nYongbing Zhang (Changong Qixia): ”Thank you, fellow fighter. Thank you,\n174\nfellow fighter An Hong, and thank you to all the fellow fighters globally. Hello\n175\neveryone, regardless of whether it is morning or evening for you, or perhaps\n176\nnoon. Hello everyone, today is the weekend here in the US Eastern Time zone;\n177\nmaybe some fellow fighters are already enjoying their weekend. Regardless, I\n178\nwish everyone a very good weekend. Today, the topic I want to discuss is some-\n179\nthing everyone is definitely very interested in. So, I will use this audio connec-\n180\ntion to talk with fellow fighter An Hong about two important court documents.\n181\nIn doing this program with fellow fighter An Hong today, the content I discuss\n182\nin this program represents only my own personal views. It does not represent\n183\nany party, it does not represent [the Defendant], nor does it represent [the De-\n184\nfendant]’slawyers. Itismerelymyownpersonalopinion,anddoesnotserveas\n185\nany legal reference or advice. Alright.”\n186\nYongbing Zhang: ”An Hong, let me first say, today’s topic is called Q&A, right?\n187\nItjustsohappensthattodayIcanalsotakethisopportunitytoexplaintoevery-\n188\none... to explain to everyone how this whole thing unfolded.”\n189\nAn Hong: ”Regarding the 38 million, 38 million.”\n190\nYongbing Zhang: ”Yes, this 38 million. Yes, regarding this... when Li Ya [Mu-\n191\nlan] testified, she said that Changong Qixia forced her to sign a so-called fake\n192\naffidavit. And then, she claimed that because he forced her, she ultimately de-\n193\nveloped suicidal thoughts. OK.”\n194\nAn Hong: ”Mm.”\n195\nYongbing Zhang: ”Let me disclose a few things to everyone... because I am the\n196\nperson who personally experienced this, so I need to tell everyone. First, when\n197\n8\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 30 of 64\nI sent the then-fellow fighter Mulan, the document she claimed I forced her to\n198\nsign... itwasn’tjustadocument. IntheIronBloodGroup,whereallthemembers\n199\nof the Iron Blood Group were present, I sent her a message, similar to a text\n200\nmessage but maybe a bit longer. My point was, ’Hey, the 38 million belonging to\n201\nthefellowfightersiscurrentlybeingtargetedbyL[TrusteeLucA.Despins]who\n202\nis attempting to take it away.’ I told her, from a legal perspective, you can do\n203\nthis because the company is currently in legal proceedings. For this company,\n204\nknown as HCHKBVI, a BVI company, besides [Yvette Wang] being a director, the\n205\nother director was exactly Mulan, OK, which is Li Ya. She was a director at the\n206\ntime, OK.”\n207\n”Legallyspeaking,thatmeansinJulyandAugust2023. Mulanwasadirec-\n208\ntorofHCHKBVI.Atthattime,[YvetteWang]wasalreadyintheMDC.Mulanwas\n209\ninAustralia,OK.Naturally,therearemanydocumentsconcerningtheHCHKBVI\n210\ncompany that must be handled by a director. For instance, if you need to hire\n211\na lawyer to respond to a lawsuit. Only a director can do that, so I told her, ’You\n212\nare a director. From a legal perspective, these matters are within the scope of a\n213\ndirector’s duties.’”\n214\n”There is another very important point. Today I want to give everyone a\n215\nbreakingrevelation,orrather,ifeveryonecarefullychecksthecourtdocuments,\n216\nactually, back at that time, actually in August 2023, she had already cooperated\n217\nwiththeprosecution... alreadycooperatedwithLuke[theTrustee]. Idon’tknow\n218\nif she was cooperating with the prosecution then.”\n219\nAn Hong: ”Mm.”\n220\nYongbingZhang: ”Ifeveryonecheckswhatshesaidduringthehearingsbefore\n221\nthe jury, maybe she was already cooperating with the police at that time. That\n222\nis to say, when she was doing these things, when we asked her to protect the\n223\ninterests of the fellow fighters, the interests of the 38 [million], she was actually\n224\n9\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 31 of 64\nalready secretly shaking hands with at least L [the Trustee]. She was communi-\n225\ncating with him. Why? Why? Because we have L’s... we have documents show-\n226\ning,OK,thereisevidenceshowing,thatatthattimeshewasalreadycooperating\n227\nwith Luke. And when did I send the document to Mulan? It was September 2,\n228\n2023. Which means, at that time, she was already L’s person. OK.”\n229\n”And now I want to give everyone a detail. What is it? When I sent the\n230\ndocument to Mulan, when I sent her the email, I sent her two files. One file was\n231\na PDF version of the affidavit.”\n232\nAn Hong: ”Mm.”\n233\nYongbingZhang: ”OnefilewasaWordversionoftheaffidavit,OK.Myintention\n234\nwas to tell her, ’Here are two versions. If you disagree, you can go ahead and\n235\nmodify it, because I gave you the Word version.’”\n236\nAn Hong: ”Right.”\n237\nYongbing Zhang: ”Right? So there was absolutely no such thing as... forcing\n238\nher. How am I forcing her? Everyone, use your normal human brain to think\n239\nabout it. I am in the US, right? There is a 16-hour time difference between us,\n240\nhow could I force her? Right? That is... right. So from this point, I don’t know\n241\nhow all her testimonies were prepared, OK. So today, I am very, very glad to\n242\nhave this opportunity to tell everyone. Ah, so my name is clearly written in\n243\nblackandwhiteinDocument833once,andthentwicemore... Ah,so,thisisthe\n244\nsecond point I am sharing with you all, or answering your second question. I\n245\ndon’tknowifIanswereditcompletely,Igetabitexcitedwhenspeaking,maybe\n246\nI went a little off-topic.”\n247\n[END COMPLETE TRANSLATION]\n248\nNote on Media Exhibit Submission: Due to the Court’s 10MB electronic fil-\n249\ning size limit for email submissions, an audio extraction of the 7-minute broad-\n250\n10\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 32 of 64\ncast (Exhibit: Extra-Judicial Admission by Yongbing Zhang) is attached hereto\n251\nin .mp3 format. The original, full-length video file is preserved and immedi-\n252\nately available for submission via physical media (USB drive) upon the Court’s\n253\nrequest.\n254\n11\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 33 of 64\n\nbragey5.dreamhosters.com/提交宣誓书/ Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 34 of 64\nHIMALAYA\nRESTORATION News Update Contact Us FILE AN AFFIDAVIT 提交宣誓书\n我们不再接受新客户。法院要求每位现有客户提交一份宣誓书。请填写右\n侧表格,立即提交您的宣誓书。\n宣誓书(支持附属或赦免请愿)\nNEW\naccessed using HID#*\nSign HID #*\n通过在上面两次输入我的唯一 HID# 作为我的签名,我在此根据伪证罪的处罚声明,我已仔细审查以下信息,并且根据美国法\n律,在我所知范围内,它是真实和正确的:\n1. 索赔人的身份和资格\nA. 我的身份信息由喜马拉雅交易所(HEX) 安全持有,并可使用上面的 HID# 访问。 B. 我根据 21 U.S.C. § 853 (n) 和联邦刑事\n诉讼规则第32.2 (C) 条提交本宣誓书,主张我在美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok 别名“Miles Guo\"案(案号 23-cr-118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.))中\n没收财产的合法权益。C. 财产的合法所有者,该财产作为稳定币储备由喜马拉雅交易所持有。我对任何非法活动\n无所知,也没有参与其中,我作为无辜投资者以善意获取了我的资产。 D. 我授权 Former FedsG roup.Com LLC 继续代表我行\n事,积极追究此索赔,并寻求恢复我的HDO 余额的等值金额,以及与我的HCN 资产贬值相关的任何相关损失,如下所述。根据\n银行记录和 的账 2021年4月开放后以及美国政府于2022年9月扣押前进行了这些购\n2. 没收财产的描述\nA. 没收财产的详细信息存储在HEX 的账户记录中, 喜马拉雅美元 稳定币余额和相关的喜马拉雅币(HCN) 余\n额。HDO 稳定币储备作为政府在上述案件中没收行动的一部分被扣押或冻结,金额达数百万美元,来自喜马拉雅交易所的银行账\n户。B. 我的HDO 余额代表一种稳定的币投资,旨在作为安全的、与美元挂钩的资产,而我的HCN 持有与平台的交易生态系统\n相关联。该扣押导致这些资产严重贬值并无法访问。C. 政府扣押 HEX 平台和网站使我无法访问我的账户信息,但 HEX 已认证我\n为客户,并提供了 HDO、HCN、存款和赎回的账户价值,我授权我的律师提供这些信息\n索赔依据\nA. 我的索赔基于以下财产的合法权益:我是该财产的合法所有者,即从扣押的稳定币储备中相当于我的 HDO 余额的美元金\n额,我的权利先于政府的没收程序。,我的权益优于任何政府索赔,因为我在相关犯罪发生前或以善意且不知任何可没收行为的\n情况下获取了该财产。该财产是合法获取的,如 HEX 记录中详尽描述,包括交易历史、存款和账户报表,显示我未参与任何所\n谓的欺诈计划。 所有建立我所有权权益的文件和账户历史均存储在HEX 的记录中,我授权在安全条件下发布。B.作为21\nU 它USS 是.C C\n一\n. 个9S 88 合55 33 法(( n 的0 )) 加(( 66 密)) 下 货下的 币的干 交无\n易\n辜所 所所有 ,有者 提者, 供,我 我 H对 对 D该 O该 财 财 (产 产 稳与 与 定非 币)和HCN(一 交无 易所 代知 币, )也 以沒 实有 现合 无理 国的 界理 金出 融相 自信 由这 ,一 如点 公。 开我\n宣\n传页\n所\n述ME 。X C, .相相 与位\nHDO 资产相关的具体损失:政府的扣押导致交易所停止赎回,因为它不再拥有储备资金。在没收前,客户能够提出赎回请求并将\nHH CD NO 兑 资换 产为 相美 关元 的。 具我 体寻 损求 失从 :喜 政马 府拉 的雅 扣押交 以易 及所 随的 后扣 押 H美 C元 N储 (备 喜资 马金 拉中 雅恢 币)复 的我 贬的\n值\nH 造D 成O 了余 直额 接的 的等 财值 务金 损额 害( 。作 在为 没稳 收定 前资 ,产 H) C。 NND .\n作作\n与\n为为\nHEX 生态系统的一部分具有价值,但平台的交易停止和资产冻结导致价值损失。 我寻求政府对我的 HCN 余额损失的补偿损害赔\n偿,按喜马拉雅交易所暂停交易时的市场价格计算。\n遵守没收程序\nA. 我根据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) (2) 要求的法定截止日期提交此索赔。 B. 我请求法院根据21 U.S.C. § 853(n) (4)-(5) 和 Fed. R.\n果果Cr 法法im 院院. P 拒拒. 绝绝32 此此.2 辅辅 (C 助 助) 的 请 请规 质 愿定 , ,安 我 我排 提 提辅 交 交助 以 以听 下 下证 陈 陈会 述 述, 以 以以 支 支审 持 持理 提 提我 交 交的 给 给索 司 司赔 法 法, 部 部呈 的 的交 减 减我 免 免的 请 请无 愿 愿辜 , ,所 根 根有 据 据权 2 证 28 8据 CC .., FF .并 . RR .挑 P P战 aa rr没 tt 9收\n9\n对 ((我 行行 政的 政 、资 、 民产 民 事的 事 和适 和 刑用 刑 事性 事 没没。 收收C 的的. 减减 如\n免或缓解规定)。 我是一名无辜所有者,对没收财产具有合法的财务权益,在不知欺诈的情况下获取。我请求司法部行使其酌情\n权,批准没收的减免或缓解,注意到没收程序最初并非设计用于处理像 HEX 这样的海外加密交易所,导致对无 用户造成不成比\n例的损害。我请求返回 HEX 持有的所有资金,包括我的 HDO 余额的等值金额,而不使用索赔管理员以节省成本和提高效率。\n我未被喜马拉雅交易所欺诈。唯一造成的损失是由于政府扣押和行动,导致交易所停止交易。\n5. 请求的救济\nA. 我恭敬地请求法院在此辅助请愿下:承认我作为无辜第三方的有效且优越的财产权益。,将我的索赔财产排除在政府的没收\n令之外,包括释放相当于我的 HDO 余额的美元。·授予法院认为公正和适当的任何其他救济,例如证据听证会或对 HEX 记录的\n发现,以验证我的索赔。 B. 如果法院不批准此辅助请愿,请接受此作为美国司法部减免程序下的返回减免请愿。我请求不使用\n索赔管理员以节省成本。我授予根据司法部和 HEX 同意的条款访问权限,并采用最严格的安全程序来保护我的信息,鉴于交易\n所的海外性质以及潜在的隐私和其他严重风险。我寻求完全减免,包括我的\n6. 授权\nA. 我授权 HEX 向法院、政府或指定的第三方提供我的账户信息,以供审查,但须遵守保护条件,以确保我的身份不公开,从而\n保 C.护 我我 授的 权安 法全 院。 、 政B. 府我 或授 指权 定 Fo 的r 第me 三rF 方ed返s 回Gr 资ou 金p. ,C 直om 接 L或LC通 代 过表 H我 EX的 协法 调律 的权 第益 三, 方继 返续 回追 。究 我索 理赔 解, 最并 终在 程所有 序相 将关 由程 法序 院中 批代 准表 ,我 我行 请事 求。 它\n考虑资产的加密性质(例如,按扣押价值转换为法定等值以减轻损失)。\n我根据伪证罪的处罚声明,前述信息在我的知识和信念范围内是真实、正确和完整的。 HID#并选择“提\n交”,我确认我的身份,并授权通过我的 HEX 账户记录验证此声明。\nSubmit\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 35 of 64\n2026/3/26 Himalaya Farm Alliance Committee Notice\nNotice Regarding the Urgent Submission of the Himalaya\n🚨\nExchange Affidavit\n\"Please, the 6,512 investors who participated in the\nHimalaya Exchange class action in 2023 and 2024, submit\n🚨\nthe affidavit via the following link as soon as possible.\"\nThose who have forgotten whether they have already\nsubmitted it can submit it again, which will not affect the\nvalidity of previous submissions.\nAffidavit Link: http\n宣誓书/\nPlease forward this to all farms and ask investors to inform\n🚨\neach other.\n\"Himalaya Farm Alliance Executive Committee, March 25,\n🚨\n2026\"\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 36 of 64\nWe no longer accept new clients. The court requires\nevery existing client to submit an affidavit. Please fill\nout the form on the right and submit your affidavit\nimmediately.\nNEW Affidavit (In Support of Ancillary or Remission Petition)\n**accessed using HID# ***\n**Sign HID # ***\nBy entering my unique HID# twice above as my signature,\nI declare under penalty of perjury that I have carefully\nreviewed the following information, and to the best of my\nknowledge and belief under U.S. law, it is true and correct:\n1. Identity and Qualification of Claimant\nA. My identity information is securely held by the\nHimalaya Exchange (HEX) and can be accessed using the\nHID# above.\nB. I am submitting this affidavit pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §\n853(n) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(c),\nasserting my lawful interest in the forfeited property in\nUnited States v. Ho Wan Kwok a/k/a \"Miles Guo\" (Case\nNo. 23-cr-118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.)).\nC. I am the lawful owner of the property, which is held as\nstablecoin reserves by the Himalaya Exchange. I have no\nknowledge of, nor did I participate in, any illegal activities,\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 37 of 64\nand I acquired my assets in good faith as an innocent\ninvestor.\nD. I authorize FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC to\ncontinue to act on my behalf, actively pursue this claim,\nand seek the recovery of the equivalent amount of my\nHDO balance, as well as any relevant losses related to the\ndepreciation of my HCN assets, as described below.\nAccording to bank records and HEX accounts, these\npurchases were made after it opened in April 2021 and\nbefore the U.S. government's seizure in September 2022.\n2. Description of Forfeited Property\nA. The detailed information of the forfeited property is\nstored in HEX's account records, containing the Himalaya\nDollar (HDO) stablecoin balance and the related Himalaya\nCoin (HCN) balance. HDO stablecoin reserves were\nseized or frozen as part of the government's forfeiture\naction in the above-mentioned case, amounting to millions\nof dollars, originating from Himalaya Exchange's bank\naccounts.\nB. My HDO balance represents a stablecoin investment\nintended as a secure, U.S. dollar-pegged asset, while my\nHCN holdings are associated with the platform's trading\necosystem. The seizure caused these assets to severely\ndepreciate and become inaccessible.\nC. The government's seizure of the HEX platform and\nwebsite rendered me unable to access my account\ninformation, but HEX has authenticated me as a customer\nand provided the account value of HDO, HCN, deposits,\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 38 of 64\nand redemptions. I authorize my attorney to provide this\ninformation.\n3. Basis for Claim\nA. My claim is based on the lawful interest in the following\nproperty: I am the lawful owner of the property, namely the\nUSD amount equivalent to my HDO balance from the\nseized stablecoin reserves, and my right is superior to the\ngovernment's forfeiture proceedings. My interest is\nsuperior to any government claim because I acquired the\nproperty in good faith and without knowledge of any\nforfeitable acts prior to the occurrence of the relevant\ncrimes. The property was acquired lawfully, as detailed in\nHEX records, including transaction history, deposits, and\naccount statements, demonstrating I did not participate in\nany alleged fraud scheme. All documents establishing my\nownership interest and account history are stored in HEX\nrecords, which I authorize to be released under secure\nconditions.\nB. As an innocent owner under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6), I\nhave no knowledge of any illegal activities related to the\nproperty, nor is there reasonable cause to believe so. I\ninvested in HEX believing it to be a legitimate\ncryptocurrency exchange providing HDO (stablecoin) and\nHCN (trading token) to achieve borderless financial\nfreedom, as publicly advertised.\nC. Specific losses related to HDO assets: The\ngovernment's seizure caused the exchange to halt\nredemptions because it no longer possessed the reserve\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 39 of 64\nfunds. Prior to the forfeiture, customers were able to\nsubmit redemption requests and convert HDO to USD. I\nseek to recover the equivalent amount of my HDO balance\n(as a stable asset) from the seized USD reserve funds of\nthe Himalaya Exchange.\nD. Specific losses related to HCN assets: The\ngovernment's seizure and the subsequent depreciation of\nHCN (Himalaya Coin) caused direct financial harm. Prior\nto the forfeiture, HCN held value as part of the HEX\necosystem, but the platform's trading halt and asset freeze\nresulted in a loss of value. I seek compensatory damages\nfrom the government for the loss of my HCN balance,\ncalculated at the market price at the time the Himalaya\nExchange suspended trading.\n4. Compliance with Forfeiture Procedures\nA. I am submitting this claim by the statutory deadline\nrequired under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2).\nB. I request the court to schedule an ancillary hearing\npursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(4)-(5) and Fed. R. Crim. P.\n32.2(c) to adjudicate my claim, present evidence of my\ninnocent ownership, and challenge the applicability of the\nforfeiture to my assets.\nC. If the court denies this ancillary petition, I submit\nthe following statements in support of a petition for\nremission submitted to the Department of Justice,\npursuant to 28 C.F.R. Part 9 (regulations governing the\nremission or mitigation of administrative, civil, and\ncriminal forfeitures). I am an innocent owner with a\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 40 of 64\nlegitimate financial interest in the forfeited property,\nacquired without knowledge of the fraud. I request the\nDepartment of Justice to exercise its discretion to grant\nremission or mitigation of the forfeiture, noting that\nforfeiture procedures were not originally designed to\nhandle overseas crypto exchanges like HEX, resulting in\ndisproportionate harm to innocent users. I request the\nreturn of all funds held by HEX, including the equivalent\namount of my HDO balance, without the use of a claims\nadministrator to save costs and improve efficiency. I have\nnot been defrauded by the Himalaya Exchange. The\nonly loss caused is due to government seizure and\nactions, resulting in the exchange halting trading.\n5. Relief Requested\nA. I respectfully request the court under this ancillary\npetition to: recognize my valid and superior property\ninterest as an innocent third party; exclude my claimed\nproperty from the government's order of forfeiture,\nincluding releasing the USD equivalent of my HDO\nbalance; and grant any other relief the court deems just\nand proper, such as an evidentiary hearing or discovery of\nHEX records to verify my claim.\nB. If the court does not grant this ancillary petition,\nplease accept this as a petition for return and\nremission under the U.S. Department of Justice's\nremission procedures. I request not to use a claims\nadministrator to save costs. I grant access under terms\nagreed upon by the Department of Justice and HEX,\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 41 of 64\nemploying the strictest security procedures to protect my\ninformation, given the overseas nature of the exchange If\nthe court denies this ancillary petition, I submit the\nfollowing statements in support of a petition for remission\nsubmitted to the Department of Justice, pursuant to 28\nC.F.R. Part 9and potential privacy and other severe risks. I\nseek full remission, including my…\n6. Authorization\nA. I authorize HEX to provide my account information to\nthe court, the government, or a designated third party for\nreview, subject to protective conditions to ensure my\nidentity is not made public, thereby protecting my safety.\nB. I authorize FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC to\nrepresent my legal interests, continue to pursue the\nclaim, and act on my behalf in all related proceedings.\nC. I authorize the court, the government, or a designated\nthird party to return the funds, directly or through a third\nparty coordinated by HEX. I understand the final\nprocedure will be approved by the court, and I request it\nconsider the crypto nature of the assets (e.g., converting\nto fiat equivalent at the seized value to mitigate loss).\nI declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing\ninformation is true, correct, and complete to the best of my\nknowledge and belief. By entering my HID# and selecting\n\"Submit,\" I confirm my identity and authorize the\nverification of this statement through my HEX account\nrecords.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 42 of 64\nSubmit\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 43 of 64\n[Translator's Note: True and Correct English Translation of the Chinese Audio Exhibit 2A\n(Duration: 1m39s)]\nForest Zhou (Government Witness): This is considered an important notice.\nJiajia: Yes, exactly. Originally this should have been notified to the 1,800 creditors, but\nnow only a few people were notified. So now, the Alliance is stepping in to bridge this\ninformation gap...\nAva Chen: ...to communicate this information gap to all the fellow fighters who are\nalready creditors. Because nobody is going to stare at this every day, considering there\nare five or six thousand [documents] and over 400 adversary proceedings. So nobody is\ngoing to type on their keyboard every day checking for documents. This has a potential\ndirect impact on the interests of the creditors. Yes, because the fees will be deducted\nfrom the assets of the debtor, Mr. Wengui. So this will affect the remaining funds\ndistributed to all creditors. If you are interested, please check the Alliance's upcoming\nannouncement.\nForest Zhou: To prevent individuals with ulterior motives from taking things out of\ncontext, we have a disclaimer here... It simply states that the Alliance is here to assist\nevery fellow fighter, every creditor... to share the summarized information we obtained\nfrom consulting many lawyers... This is our disclaimer, right? The disclaimer will not be\nincluded in the screenshots.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 44 of 64\n[Translator's Note: True and Correct English Translation of the Chinese Audio Exhibit 2C\n(Duration: 4m13s)]\nAva Chen: I will briefly explain what this is. Recently, there have been some updates in our\nConnecticut bankruptcy case... Because the court documents were not served to each of\nthe approximately 1,800 creditors, and only a few creditors were notified, we want to\ninform everyone here. If you are a fellow fighter who has already registered as a\ncreditor... and you are interested in understanding this latest motion regarding the\npayment of the Trustee's fees... the Alliance here will help coordinate everyone, translate\nsome documents, and share the latest information.\nYou can immediately contact your Farm Owner or CEO... The deadline for filing an\nobjection is April 17 EST... The Alliance has tentatively scheduled an information meeting\nfor tomorrow night EST...\nForest Zhou: I actually want to add something here... The trustee... has already burned\nthrough 70 or 80 million... we are providing this assistance so everyone understands the\nprocess... If you have this intention, the Alliance will assist everyone.\nAva Chen: I want to add that after our broadcast, we will issue an Alliance\nannouncement... containing both Chinese and English versions.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 45 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT N\nExhibit N: AI-forged audio recording of a fabricated prison phone call involving a\nmicrowave incident and a Christmas meal to misrepresent prison conditions.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 46 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 47 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 48 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 49 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 50 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT O\nExhibit O: AI-forged audio recording (May 2025) featuring Qingteng promoting\nTDCCP crypto and disseminating fabricated narratives of an absurd prison lifestyle.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 51 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 52 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 53 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 54 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 55 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT P\nExhibit P: Video Broadcast (Aug 18, 2025) featuring Qingteng and Jiajia coordinating\nthe submission of petitions to assist the prosecution's asset confiscation objectives.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 56 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 57 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 58 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT Z\nExhibit Z: Official Court Record (Dkt. 833) documenting prosecutorial framing by\nattributing the criminal acts of \"Hijackers\" to the defendant to justify sentencing.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 59 of 64\n\nfamily at the wedding of one of his daughters, where the Trustee’s three daughters were circled in\nred10:\n(GX 1B124F; see also Tr. 4717).\nBeyond the targeting and attempted intimidation of the Trustee and his family, Guo ordered\nothers to obstruct the court proceedings in other ways. When Ya Li received a subpoena from the\nbankruptcy trustee, Guo told her to “throw it in the rubbish bin,” and she complied because she\nbelieved Guo when he said that the U.S. Department of Justice had been “weaponized by the CCP.”\n(Tr. 1498-99). In connection with the G Enterprise’s efforts to keep assets outside the reach of the\nbankruptcy trustee even after Guo’s arrest, Yongbing Zhang—the attorney and co-conspirator who\n“won” a Lamborghini in the G|CLUBS “sweepstakes,” and with whom Guo who has continued to\n10 The red circles highlighting Despins’s daughters appeared on the photograph that was recovered\nfrom Guo’s cellphone. The Government added only the black redactions, to protect the privacy of\nvictims and/or third parties in this public filing.\n26\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 60 of 64\n\nmeet in the MDC following his arrest and detention—asked Ya Li to sign a false affidavit for filing\nin one of the bankruptcy litigations. (Tr. 1523-29; GX VI 66). When she refused, Zhang threatened\nMs. Li with $38 million in liability. (Tr. 1530). After this threat from Guo’s attorney, Ms. Li\ncontemplated suicide. (Tr. 1530-31).\nMore recently, Guo’s enterprise continues to harass and threaten those that oppose it. On\nMarch 10, 2026, in a video provided to the Government by a victim, Guo’s NFSC presenters\nrequested that Guo’s remaining followers provide statements to Guo’s court appointed counsel. In\naddition, the presenter indicated that the 126 victims who previously provided statements “will all\nhave to bear the consequences.” (Dkt. 832, Stmt. 206-B (translated)).\nThat appears to be a reference to the 126 victim statements filed with the Court on November 22,\n2024. (Dkt. 477).\n3. Guo’s Post-Arrest Obstruction\nEven after his arrest Guo has engaged in obstructive conduct. Guo’s criminal Enterprise\ncontinued to operate following his arrest and Guo continued to direct it as it relocated to the UAE,\noutside the reach of U.S. law enforcement. (PSR ¶¶ 103-105). Following his arrest, Guo’s\n27\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 61 of 64\n\nfollowers sought to fabricate evidence at the Mahwah Mansion to make it appear as if it were a\nG|CLUBS property, rather than Guo’s personal family home. (PSR ¶¶ 91-95). Similarly, following\nGuo’s arrest, one of Guo’s top lieutenants, Brother Long Island, instructed Ya Li and others to\ndelete evidence from their phones in case they were arrested.11 (Tr. 1500-02).\nIV. VICTIM STATEMENTS\nTo date, the Government has received and provided to the Court a total of approximately\n225 victim impact statements. These statements reflect the extreme harm perpetrated by Guo on\nhundreds of victims located throughout the United States, harm that included extreme financial\nhardships, mental anguish, broken family bonds, and contemplation of self-harm including suicide.\nSpecifically, on November 22, 2024, the Government filed a letter attaching approximately\n126 victim statements. (Dkt. 477). On December 11, 2024, the Government filed seven additional\nvictim statements that it had received. Dkt. 482. On January 2, 2025 and January 3, 2025, the\nGovernment filed a total of 16 additional victim statements. (Dkts. 486, 487). The Court has sealed\ndockets 477, 482, 486, and 487, which entries contain the aforementioned statements. On April 7,\n2026, the Government filed an additional 74 statements under seal. (Dkt. 832). These cover letters\nare provided to the Court as an Exhibit, under seal, in light of the Court’s prior ruling.12\nFor the Court’s convenience, the Government will provide a hard copy of all of these victim\nimpact statements to the Court’s chambers.\n11 Prior to Guo’s arrest, Guo himself instructed Ya Li and others to delete evidence from their\nphones. (Tr. 1500-02).\n12 The Government believes that the cover letter at Docket 477, which is attached under seal as\nExhibit A to this filing, should be filed on the docket. That cover letter does not contain any\npersonally identifying information for any victims. It merely summarizes certain statements\nreceived as of that date. Accordingly, the Government respectfully requests permission to file that\nletter on the docket.\n28\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 62 of 64\n\ncommitted through Guo’s complex fraud, money laundering, and racketeering enterprise—or the\nverdict rendered by an impartial jury during the trial presided over by this Court.\nIn assessing specific deterrence and protection of the public, the Court should weigh\nheavily that the defendant has never accepted responsibility for his truly offensive and blatant\nfraud. But Guo’s rejection of responsibility is worse than just that. A defendant is entitled to claim\ninnocence but Guo goes further: he falsely claims victimhood. He attempts to denigrate the rule\nof law that brought him to justice. Such indignancy coupled with Guo’s baseless suggestion of\nimpropriety in the prosecution of this case warrants a substantial sentence. See, e.g., Raniere, Dkt.\n966 at 16 (“To make matters worse, [the defendant] and his counsel . . . are engaged in a public\nrelations campaign to cast doubt on the integrity of the judicial system and the jury verdict.”).\nThird, perhaps most troubling is that Guo, and his enterprise, have continued criminal\nactivities for the three years that Guo has been incarcerated. Following his arrest and detention,\nGuo continued to direct his enterprise as it relocated to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), outside\nthe reach of U.S. law enforcement. (PSR ¶¶ 103-105). Victims who have monitored the online\nmusings of Guo and his remaining acolytes further illustrate how Guo continues to operate his\nenterprise, and uses it stifle victims from speaking out against him:\n• “According to Yue Zhou, the Secretary-General of the New Federal State of China\n(NFSC), in the weekly ‘Until We Meet Again’ program every Friday, he and\nseveral other key members visit Ho Wan Kwok every week. Many of the orders\ncurrently being executed by NFSC have been approved by Kwok.” Dkt. 832, Stmt.\n214.\n• “Despite the arrest of Guo Wengui, the fraud group has not been dismantled. The\nfarms related to it are still operating, and Guo Wengui is still directing members in\nprison, instructing them to continue to defraud and threaten victims. In addition,\nmembers of the fraud gang are lurking in different countries and are still continuing\nto defraud, launder money and cover up crimes.” Dkt. 832, Stmt. 188.\n67\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 63 of 64\nUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\nFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nIn re: BAO CHU,\nAppellate Case No. 26-1296\nApplicant.\nDistrict Court Case No. 1:23-cr-\n00118-AT\nHon. Analisa Torres\nCERTIFICATE OF OMNIBUS SERVICE\nI,BaoChu, proceedingProSe, herebycertifyunderpenaltyofperjurypursuant\nto 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that on June 15, 2026, I served a true and correct copy of the\n“EMERGENCYMOTIONTOSTRIKESENTENCINGMEMORANDUM(DKT.833)INITS\nENTIRETY,COMPELARULE104EVIDENTIARY(FATICO)HEARING,ANDISSUERULE\n17(c)SUBPOENAS”,alongwiththeFormT-1080MotionInformationStatement,and\nTen (10) Objective Evidentiary Exhibits (Exhibits 1 through 10).\nService was effected concurrently via Electronic Mail to ensure immediate re-\nceiptandtostrictlysatisfytherequirementsofOmnibusServiceuponallpartiesof\nrecord and statutory oversight entities:\n1. Appellate Court (Second Circuit)\nClerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit\nEmail: prosecases@ca2.uscourts.gov\n2. District Court (S.D.N.Y.)\nHon. Analisa Torres, U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.\nEmail: Torres_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov; ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov\n3. Counsel for the United States (Prosecution)\nMicah Fergenson, Ryan Finkel, Juliana Murray, Justin Horton\nAssistant United States Attorneys, S.D.N.Y.\nEmail: micah.fergenson@usdoj.gov; ryan.finkel@usdoj.gov;\njuliana.murray@usdoj.gov; justin.horton@usdoj.gov\n1\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 64 of 64\n4. Counsel for the Defendants (Defense)\nJohn F. Kaley, Esq.\nEmail: jkaley@doarlaw.com\n(And all relevant defense counsel of record via ECF/email correlation)\n5. Statutory Oversight Entities (Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651)\nDOJOfficeoftheInspectorGeneral(OIG)&OfficeofProfessionalResponsibil-\nity (OPR)\nU.S. House Judiciary Committee (Select Subcommittee on Weaponization)\nI declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.\nExecuted on June 15, 2026.\nRespectfully submitted,\n/s/ Bao Chu\nBao Chu\nApplicant Pro Se /\nBona Fide Third-Party Property Owner\nStanding Confirmed via S.D.N.Y. HID:\nF56BDDZ\n2","body_zh":"案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 1 页，共 64 页\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 2 页，共 64 页\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT（美国联邦地区法院）\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK（纽约南区）\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA（美利坚合众国），\n原告，\n案号：1:23-cr-00118-AT\n诉\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等人，\n被告。\n关于全面剔除量刑备忘录（案卷编号 833）、强制举行《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 32(i)(2) 条及第 104 条证据（FATICO）听证会并签发第 17(c) 条传票的紧急动议\nI. 法定授权与最高法院先例\n根据《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 32(i)(2) 条，本法院负有严格的法定职责，须对量刑前调查报告中的任何争议部分或其他争议事项作出裁定。\n申请人特此提出七（7）份经认证的客观证据，以证明政府的《量刑备忘录》（案卷编号 833）是建立在明知而使用伪造证据及物理不可能性的基础之上，直接触发了 Napue v. Illinois（纳皮诉伊利诺伊州案）, 360 U.S. 264 (1959) 所确立的宪法禁止性规定。\n法院必须召开 Fatico 证据听证会；在提出确凿的客观实体记录的情况下未召开听证会，构成对正当程序的结构性侵犯。\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 3 页，共 64 页\nII. 政府时间线的绝对物理不可能性（违反 NAPUE 规则）\n在案卷编号 833（第 68 页）中，检方声称被告于 2023 年 3 月 15 日美国东部时间 16:48 从 Metropolitan Detention Center（大都会拘留中心，简称 MDC）通过电话“继续指挥”法外行动。这一主张被政府自身的记录客观推翻：\n1. 法庭录音文本（证据 1）：官方案卷编号 14 客观证实，在 2023 年 3 月 15 日美国东部时间整 16:55，被告本人正出庭于美国治安法官 Katharine H. Parker 面前。在联邦法庭出庭的同时从 MDC 拨打指挥电话在物理上是不可能的。\n2. 官方 BOP（联邦监狱管理局）TRUVIEW 记录（证据 2）：官方监狱记录（案卷编号 312-3，贝茨编号 USAO_00297003）确凿证明，被告在 2023 年 3 月 28 日之前拥有零次经授权的电话联络。检方故意提交一份与其自身监狱管理局实体记录存在实质性冲突的叙述，构成检察官不当行为以及对法庭的欺诈。\nIII. 对独立公司行为的欺诈性归责\n检方在案卷编号 833 中声称，被告创建了“TDCCP”数字货币以资助法律辩护。这完全依赖于法外代理人和 AI 伪造的音频（证据 7）。\n1. 纽约州州务卿（NY DOS）公司注册记录（证据 3）：客观的公共记录（DOS ID: 7518505）证明，TDCCP 的发行实体“ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC”是由政府证人 Forrest Zhou（周峰/Yoe Zhou）于 2025 年 1 月 27 日单方面注册并运营的。\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 4 页，共 64 页\n2. 安大略省高等法院命令（证据 4）：案号 CV-25-00753415-0000（日期为 2026 年 5 月 22 日）客观记录了该同一实体独立提起了民事诉讼，并被命令支付 53,000 加元的不利诉讼费用。\n将一名政府证人名下注册公司的独立且具有法律记录的行为归责于被羁押的被告，违反了第六修正案对抗条款。\nIV. 可编辑文档传输所证伪的伪证\n检方依赖 Ya Li（李亚）的证言，声称她受到了 Yongbing Zhang（张勇兵）“承担 3800 万美元法律责任的威胁”，构成了迫使其签署宣誓书的“暴力强迫”（案卷编号 833，第 27-28 页）。\n可编辑文档悖论（证据 5）：Yongbing Zhang 于 2026 年 4 月 10 日作出的法外公开承认客观证实，他向 Ya Li 发送了一份 PDF 和一份完全可编辑的 Word 文档，明确指示她如果不同意可以修改内容。实体上提供可编辑草稿与“强迫”的法律定义是互斥的。\nV. 大规模身份盗窃与全面污染原则\n检方通过声称存在“数千名受害者”来寻求极重的量刑加重，而案卷中仅包含大约 225 份书面陈述。\n网络钓鱼与 HID 盗窃（证据 6）：客观记录证明，该代理实体建立了一个钓鱼网站（bragey5.dreamhosters.com），非法套取了 6,512 名投资者由法院分配的 HID 代码。检方随后利用这些被盗标识符，在 21 U.S.C. § 853(i) 减免程序下行政性膨胀受害者名单，无视投资者明确否认受害者身份的声明，这违反了《犯罪受害者权利法》（CVRA）并触发了全面污染原则。\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 5 页，共 64 页\nVI. 诉求的救济\n依据本动议提供的客观证据体系，申请人请求法院：\n1. 立即向 BOP 签发第 17(c) 条传票，调取完整的 MDC 电信及探视记录。\n2. 强制召开《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 32(i)(2) 条及第 104 条 Fatico 听证会，以对抗性方式质证案卷编号 833 中存在的物理不可能性。\n3. 鉴于已客观记录的违反 Napue 规则行为，全面剔除案卷编号 833。\n谨此提交，\n/s/ Bao Chu\nBao Chu\n本人亲自诉讼（Pro Se）/\n善意第三方财产所有人\nS.D.N.Y. HID: F56BDDZ\n日期：2026 年 6 月 15 日\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 6 页，共 64 页\n\nN3F5kwoA\n1 美国联邦地区法院\n纽约南区\n2 ------------------------------x\n3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA，纽约州纽约市\n4 诉 23 Cr. 118 (AT)(KHP)\n5 HO WAN KWOK，\n6 被告。\n7 ------------------------------x\n8 2023 年 3 月 15 日\n下午 4:55\n\n10 主审：\n11 尊敬的 KATHARINE H. PARKER，\n12 美国治安法官\n\n14 出庭人员\n15 DAMIAN WILLIAMS\n纽约南区联邦检察官\n16 出庭代表：RYAN B. FINKEL\n17 JULIANA MURRAY\nMICAH FERGENSON\n18 联邦助理检察官\n19 FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF NEW YORK（纽约联邦辩护人协会）\n被告律师\n20 出庭代表：TAMARA L. GIWA\n\n其他出席人员：LILY LAU，普通话翻译员\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 7 页，共 64 页\n\nN3F5kwoA\n1 （呼叫本案）\n2 法庭副书记官：首先请政府方，\n3 请报上姓名以列入记录。\n4 FINKEL 先生：下午好，法官阁下。Ryan Finkel、\n5 Juliana Murray、Micah Fergenson 代表美国政府。在律师席\n6 与我们一起的还有 Geoffrey Mearns，他是我们办公室的\n7 律师助理。\n8 法庭副书记官：请郭先生的辩护律师，\n9 报上姓名以列入记录。\n10 GIWA 女士：纽约联邦辩护人协会的 Tamara\n11 Giwa 今天代表 Miles Guo（郭文贵）先生出庭。下午好，法官\n12 阁下。\n13 法庭：下午好。下午好，\n14 郭先生。\n15 被告：（用英语）法官阁下，下午\n16 好。\n17 法庭：我是 Parker 法官。\n18 在我们开始之前，郭先生，我想确保\n19 您能够听懂并听到翻译员的声音。\n20 被告：（用英语）是的，法官阁下。\n21 法庭：今天诉讼程序的目的是\n22 告知您享有的某些权利，告知您\n23 对您的指控，考虑是否应当为您\n24 指定辩护律师，并决定在何种条件（如有）下\n25 可以在审判前将您释放。\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 8 页，共 64 页\n\n证据 C\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 9 页，共 64 页\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 10 页，共 64 页\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 11 页，共 64 页\n\n日期：04/04/2024 地点：DC\nFederal Bureau of Prisons（联邦监狱管理局）\n时间：09:04 AM\nTRUVIEW\n在押人员中心报告\n敏感但未列入机密\n联系人 联系人\n创建日期 最后修改日期 地点 状态 电话 名 姓 警报拦截 描述\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM BRO 有效 Samu Samu 否\n3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM 3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM BRO 有效 Kaili Kaili 否\n3/13/2024 2:07:21 PM 3/13/2024 2:07:21 PM BRO 有效 Pallan Pallan 否\n9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM 9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM BRO 有效 Dan Dan 新律师 否\n9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM 9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM BRO 有效 Dan Dan 新律师 否\n8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM 8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM BRO 有效 May Goo 否\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM BRO 有效 Mn Mn 否\n5/3/2023 1:37:17 PM 5/3/2023 1:37:17 PM BRO 有效 May Q 否\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 On On 否\n8/4/2023 3:22:21 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 New Number New Umber 否\n8/4/2023 3:22:21 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 New Number New Umber 否\n3/31/2023 8:07:15 AM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Cangtian Op 否\n2/1/2024 8:52:16 AM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Vicky V 否\n4/1/2023 1:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Wy Wy 否\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Ml Ml 否\n8/9/2023 6:22:17 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Mn Mn 否\n3/28/2023 1:37:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 New Number New Number 否\n8/16/2023 7:52:18 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 New New New New 否\n12/10/2023 12:37:23 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Jet Li 否\n8/4/2023 1:22:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Kk Kk 否\n8/8/2023 9:07:20 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 New Jersey Jersey 否\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Wen Guo 否\n8/11/2023 12:22:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 E E 否\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Cathy Cathy 否\n8/11/2023 12:07:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Cathy Cathy 否\n8/11/2023 12:22:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 C C 否\n用户 ID：TF57175 第 3 页，共 6 页\nUSAO_00297003\n机密\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 12 页，共 64 页\n\n日期：04/04/2024 地点：DC\nFederal Bureau of Prisons（联邦监狱管理局）\n时间：09:04 AM\nTRUVIEW\n在押人员中心报告\n敏感但未列入机密\n联系人 联系人\n创建日期 最后修改日期 地点 状态 电话 名 姓 警报拦截 描述\n8/21/2023 7:07:23 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 C C 否\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO 无效 Ab Ab 否\n3/20/2023 8:52:14 AM 8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM BRO 无效 May Goo 否\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 8/9/2023 6:22:17 PM BRO 无效 Mn Mn 否\n6/13/2023 9:22:18 PM 6/14/2023 6:22:25 PM BRO 无效 Qing Zhi 否\n3/21/2023 7:22:14 AM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 Bing Zhang 否\n3/16/2023 6:52:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 否\n3/16/2023 6:52:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 否\n4/1/2023 1:52:16 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 Ru Shui 否\n3/21/2023 7:22:14 AM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 Si Qi 否\n3/28/2023 1:37:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 An P 否\n4/22/2023 8:07:18 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 S Best 否\n4/22/2023 8:07:18 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO 无效 S Best 否\n通话\n联系人 联系人\n开始日期 地点 已完成 通话时长 电话 名 姓 城市 州 国家/地区\n4/4/2024 8:32:53 AM BRO 是 15 X X\n4/4/2024 7:03:14 AM BRO 是 15 Gw W\n4/3/2024 2:42:12 PM BRO 是 8 Gw W\n4/2/2024 1:22:26 PM BRO 是 13 Gw W\n4/2/2024 12:04:25 PM BRO 是 15 Gw W\n4/1/2024 2:29:57 PM BRO 是 15 Gw W\n3/20/2024 6:52:40 PM BRO 是 15 Gw W\n3/20/2024 5:12:44 PM BRO 是 1 Gw W\n3/20/2024 1:20:58 PM BRO 是 3 Gw W\n3/19/2024 6:48:48 PM BRO 是 4 Gw W\n用户 ID：TF57175 第 4 页，共 6 页\nUSAO_00297004\n机密\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 13 页，共 64 页\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 14 页，共 64 页\n\n案件：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷记录：32.1，第 15 页，共 64 页\n\n在其被捕并羁押后于大都会拘留中心（Metropolitan Detention Center, MDC）会见——要求Ya Li（李亚）签署一份虚假宣誓书，以便在其中一起破产诉讼中提交。（Tr. 1523-29；GX VI 66）。在她拒绝后，Zhang威胁李女士要承担3800万美元的赔偿责任。（Tr. 1530）。在受到郭文贵（Ho Wan Kwok）律师的这一威胁后，李女士曾企图自杀。（Tr. 1530-31）。\n\n最近，郭文贵犯罪集团继续骚扰和威胁反对它的人。2026年3月10日，在一份由受害者提供给政府的视频中，郭文贵的新中国联邦（New Federal State of China, NFSC）节目主持人要求郭文贵剩余的追随者向郭文贵法庭指定的律师提供陈述书。此外，主持人还表示，此前提供陈述书的126名受害者“都必须承担后果”。（Dkt. 832，Stmt. 206-B（译文））。\n\n这似乎是指于2024年11月22日向法院提交的126份受害者陈述书。（Dkt. 477）。\n\n3. 郭文贵被捕后的妨碍司法行为\n\n即使在被捕后，郭文贵仍从事妨碍司法的行为。郭文贵的犯罪集团（Enterprise）在其被捕后继续运作，并且随着该集团迁至美国执法部门管辖范围之外的阿联酋（UAE），郭文贵继续指挥该集团。（PSR ¶¶ 103-105）。在其被捕后，郭文贵的\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 16 of 64\n\nOPENGOVNY 卫生局 商业 教育 其他\n纽约州医疗卫生机构\n概述\n该数据集包含在纽约州卫生部（New York State Department of Health）医疗卫生机构信息系统中注册的约6,000家医疗卫生机构。医疗卫生机构信息系统（HFIS）包含第28条、第36条、第40条和第7条规定的医疗卫生保健机构和项目。每家机构均注册有机构ID、机构名称、营业地址、运营者名称、运营者地址、电话、网站、开业日期等。\n搜索机构\n数据集信息\n主题 卫生\n管辖区 纽约州\n数据提供方 纽约州卫生部医疗卫生机构规划、许可和财务中心\n来源 data.ny.gov\n数据集详情\n纽约州卫生部医疗卫生机构规划、许可和财务中心负责维护医疗卫生机构信息系统（HFIS），其中包含以下持牌医疗卫生保健机构的营业许可证信息：(1) 第28条：医院、疗养院、诊断与治疗中心、助产分娩中心；(2) 第36条：认证家庭卫生服务机构、持牌家庭护理服务机构、长期家庭卫生保健项目；以及 (3) 第40条：临终关怀院。该信息包含运营者和服务场所，包括运营者名称、场所地址以及认证床位和/或服务。\n该数据集包含来自医疗卫生机构信息系统（HFIS）的第28条、第36条、第40条和第7条医疗卫生保健机构和项目的位置。第28条机构为医院、疗养院、诊断治疗中心和助产分娩中心。第36条机构为认证家庭卫生保健机构、持牌家庭护理服务机构和长期家庭卫生保健项目。第40条机构为临终关怀院。第7条为持牌成年人照护机构。每家机构均注册有机构ID、机构名称、营业地址、运营者名称、运营者地址、电话、网站、开业日期等。\n为让纽约州居民获得应有的政府数据和信息访问权限，州长安德鲁·M·库默（Governor Andrew M. Cuomo）于2013年3月启动了Open NY计划并签署了第95号行政命令。该命令指示州政府机构识别、分类并在由信息技术服务办公室（ITS）管理的州开放数据网站上公布其数据。Open NY提高了透明度，改善了政府绩效，增强了纽约州居民参与政府事务的能力，并促进了全州范围内的研究和经济机会。\n搜索结果\n机构名称 地址 描述 开业日期\nIngersoll Place Licensed Home Care Services Agency Ingersoll Adult Home, Inc. 3359 Consaul Road, Schenectady, New York 12304 持牌家庭护理服务机构 2023-06-09\nCoopers Corner, Inc. 11 Mill Road, New Rochelle, New York 10804 成年人照护院 2023-06-09\nNew Vision Home Care Services, Llc 96-09 Springfield Blvd, Unit 204, Queens Village, New York 11429 持牌家庭护理服务机构 2023-05-25\nAnchor Health Homecare Services Inc 173 Huguenot Street, Suite 221, New Rochelle, New York 10801 持牌家庭护理服务机构 2023-05-24\nSunrise Home Care, Inc 15 Cooledge Drive, Brewster, New York 10509 持牌家庭护理服务机构 2023-05-22\nSt. Peter's Hospital - SPARC St Peters Hospital Inc 1300 Massachusetts Avenue, Troy, New York 12180 医院 2023-05-15\nWestside Health Center Housing Works Health Services III, Inc. 326 West 48th Street, New York, New York 10036 诊断与治疗中心延伸诊所 2023-05-12\nDaniel Squire Oral D & T Center Mobile School-Based Dental Unit Squire Hall-3435 Main Street- SUNY/B, 3425 Main St, Buffalo, New York 14214 依托学校的诊断与治疗中心延伸诊所 2023-05-04\nField of Dreams Senior Living Olean Manor, Inc 3260 N 7th Street, Cattaraugus, New York 14706 持牌家庭护理服务机构 2023-04-25\nUltimate Care INC Ultimate Care, Inc 250 Fulton Avenue, Suite 511, Hempstead, New York 11550 持牌家庭护理服务机构 2023-04-06\nUltimate Care Inc Ultimate Care, Inc. 280 Route 211 East, Suite 202, Middletown, New York 10940 持牌家庭护理服务机构 2023-04-06\nSun River Health White Plains Sun River Health Care, Inc. 360 Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, New York 10605 诊断与治疗中心延伸诊所 2023-03-29\nSun River Health Copiague Sun River Health Care, 445 Oak Street, Copiague, New York 11726 诊断与治疗中心 2023\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 17 of 64\nopengovny.com/corporation/7518505#google_vignette\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 18 of 64\nOPENGOVNY 卫生局 商业 教育 其他\n纽约州公司实体概述\nAction Action Action LLC 位置信息\n类似实体\n87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P, Elmhurst, NY 11373\n数据集信息\n概述\nACTION ACTION ACTION LLC（州务卿编号 DOS #7518505）是一家位于埃尔姆赫斯特（Elmhurst）并在纽约州州务卿办公室（NYSDOS）注册的本地有限责任公司。该商业实体于2025年1月27日初次备案。注册营业地址位于87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P, Elmhurst, NY 11373。DOS法律文书送达联络人（DOS process contact）为Action Action Action LLC。\n商业实体信息\nDOS编号 7518505\n当前实体名称 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\n县 皇后区（Queens）\n管辖区 纽约州\n实体类型 本地有限责任公司\n初次DOS备案日期 2025-01-27\nDOS送达接收名称 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nDOS送达接收地址 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\n最新备案信息\n备案编号 250127002666\n备案类型 组织章程（Articles of Organization）\n变更证明代码 01DAA\n批准日期 2025-01-27\n备案日期 2025-01-27\n实体类型 本地有限责任公司\n当前实体名称 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\n生效日期 2025-01-27\n存续期限 永久\n法律条款 《有限责任公司法》第203条 - 《有限责任公司法》\n县 皇后区\n管辖区 纽约州\n备案人姓名 FORREST ZHOU\n备案人地址 C/O Cmly & Associates LLC\n3636 Prince St. #307\nFlushing\nNY 11354\nDOS送达接收名称 该有限责任公司（The LLC）\nDOS送达接收地址 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\n实体名称历史\n备案日期 实体名称 备案编号 类型 状态\n2025-01-27 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC 250127002666 实际 存续\n实体地址历史\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 19 of 64 概述\n变更证明代码 01DAA\n位置信息\n批准日期 2025-01-27\n类似实体\n备案日期 2025-01-27\n数据集信息\n实体类型 本地有限责任公司\n当前实体名称 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\n生效日期 2025-01-27\n存续期限 永久\n法律条款 《有限责任公司法》第203条 - 《有限责任公司法》\n县 皇后区\n管辖区 纽约州\n备案人姓名 FORREST ZHOU\n备案人地址 C/O Cmly & Associates LLC\n3636 Prince St. #307\nFlushing\nNY 11354\nDOS送达接收名称 该有限责任公司\nDOS送达接收地址 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\n实体名称历史\n备案日期 实体名称 备案编号 类型 状态\n2025-01-27 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC 250127002666 实际 存续\n实体地址历史\n备案日期 地址类型 地址名称 地址 备案编号\n2025-01-27 法律文书送达 该有限责任公司 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P, Elmhurst, NY 11373 250127002666\n位置信息\n街道地址 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P 在 Google 地图中打开 纽约 新城高中（Newtown High School）\n50th Ave\nCity NY Elmhurst Dongan\nSt James 51\n邮政编码 11373\nCorona Ave.\n87th St\n51st St\n50th Ave Apt 2p 51st Ave\n51st Ave\nBroadway\n52nd Ave 53rd Ave Google 键盘快捷键\n地图数据 ©2026 Google GS(2011)6020 条款\n相同邮政编码内的公司\n公司名称 地址 注册代理人姓名 初次DOS备案日期\nYongwu Inc. 88-23 54 Avenue, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-26\nArcentales LLC 4319 Judge St Fl 1, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-19\nObsidian Gaa Inc. 89-20 55th Ave., 5q, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-29\nTopg Remodeling Corp. 91-01 lamont avenue, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-19\nMyagdiko Family Grocery Store Inc 9311 50th Ave, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-18\nBormate Thera Kines Rehab LLC 9048 53rd Ave, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-22\nGentle Guardian Homecare Inc. 5135 Simonson St, 1st Flr, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-26\nEntree Foods Inc. 5109 Gorsline St, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-22\nOmni Cable LLC 83-69 Vietor Ave #3, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-27\nAlmas It Service Corp 94-27 Corona Ave, Queens, NY 11373 Luis Santiago Sanchez Batista 2026-05-29\n查找相同邮政编码内的所有公司\n类似实体\n名称类似的公司\n\n案件编号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷分录：32.1，第 20 页，共 64 页 概览\n同名/近似名称公司\n位置信息\n公司名称 地址 注册代理人姓名 初始 DOS 备案日期\nLove In Action Doula Services LLC 26 BellA ir Lane, Wappingers Falls1, NY 12590 2024-03-04 相似实体\nAction Financial Planning, Inc. 191 north avenue, Mount Clemens, MI 48043 2024-04-22 数据集信息\nA Call for Action To Vote, Inc 3005 village park drive, Spring Hope, NC 27882 2022-12-12\n改进信息\n您是否有关于 Action Action Action LLC 的更多信息？请填写下表。\n姓名\n地址\n电话\n电子邮件\n网站\n内容\n提交表格\n数据集信息\n该数据集包含约三百万家在 New York State Department of State（NYSDOS，纽约州州务卿办公室/纽约州务卿处）注册的商业实体和公司。州务卿办公室对纽约州内每家注册成立企业的每一次备案均保留记录。每个商业实体均登记有 DOS ID、企业法定名称、类型、备案日期、注册代理人姓名、办事处地址等。\n主题 商业与经济\n管辖区 纽约州\n数据提供方 New York State Department of State（NYSDOS，纽约州州务卿办公室）\n来源 data.ny.gov\n搜索公司\n数据集详情\n纽约州州务卿办公室是州政府中最古老、最多元化的机构之一，致力于让纽约成为所有以之为家的人更具包容性、更公平和更繁荣的地方。该处于 1778 年成立，两个多世纪以来被称为“记录保管人”，通过向地方政府、企业、社区组织和公民提供大量基本服务和项目，改善所有纽约人的生活质量。商业公司、非营利公司、有限责任公司和有限合伙企业必须向纽约州州务卿办公室提交设立文件，方可在纽约州内开展业务。每个公司、有限责任公司或有限合伙企业的名称必须是唯一的。\n选择在纽约州开展业务的州外公司必须向州务卿办公室提交授权申请。如果该实体名称与州务卿办公室备案的所有其他实体的名称无法区分，则该公司必须使用一个假名（fictitious name），该假名同样必须与州务卿办公室备案的所有其他实体的名称区分开来。除少数例外情况外，每家商业公司必须每两年提交一份声明，核实其法律文书送达地址，并确认公司首席执行官的姓名和地址以及公司主要行政办公室的地址。有限责任公司必须每两年提交一份核实法律文书送达地址的声明。\n本公司和商业实体数据库包括商业及非营利公司、有限合伙企业、有限责任公司、有限责任合伙企业以及其他各类企业。该数据库还包括公司、有限责任公司和有限合伙企业的假定名称（assumed name）备案。每个商业实体均登记有 DOS ID、企业法定名称、实体类型、备案日期、注册代理人姓名及地址、高级职员姓名及地址、办事处地址等。\n为了让纽约人获得他们应得的政府数据和信息，州长 Andrew M. Cuomo（安德鲁·M·科莫）于 2013 年 3 月发起了“开放纽约”（Open NY）倡议并签署了第 95 号行政命令。该命令指示州政府机构在由 Office of Information Technology Services（ITS，信息技术服务办公室）管理的州开放数据网站上识别、编目并发布其数据。“开放纽约”提高了透明度，改善了政府绩效，赋予纽约人参与政府事务的权利，并在全州范围内促进了研究和经济机会。\nOPENGOVNY 联系方式\n\n案件编号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷分录：32.1，第 21 页，共 64 页\n\n案件编号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷分录：32.1，第 22 页，共 64 页\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT（美国联邦地区法院）\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK（纽约南区）\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA（美利坚合众国）\n诉\n[DEFENDANT NAME]（[被告姓名]），\n被告。\n案件编号：[CASE NUMBER]\n证据项 AA\n\n证据项 AA：新发现证据之提存及完整笔录（证人 Yongbing Zhang（张勇兵）在 GETTR 平台及公开直播中的审判外自认）\n\n善意翻译及举证责任转移声明\n\n鉴于极端紧急的情况以及量刑听证会迫在眉睫，本人作为受保护的第三方权利人以自辩人（Pro Se）身份出庭，缺乏时间和财力来获取这些新发现的、具有高度开脱罪责性质（exculpatory）的公开帖文和直播的正式认证翻译件。下文提供的英文文本构成了对 Yongbing Zhang（又名“长弓骑士”/“法统”）撰写和发表的原始中文材料的完整、未删节、善意且准确的参考翻译。\n\n如果拥有无限调查资源、雇佣内部语言学家并积极监控这些特定配合者社交媒体账户的政府方质疑这些完整翻译的准确性，则举证责任完全转移给政府方，由其向法院提交一份官方的、经认证的翻译件。绝不能允许政府方利用自辩权利人无法立即获得认证翻译员这一情况作为程序漏洞，来压制证明其自身构成 Napue 违规行为（检察官明知虚假证言违规）以及欺诈法院（Fraud on the Court）的无可辩驳的证据。\n\n——————————————————————————–\n\n文件 1：YONGBING ZHANG（张勇兵）GETTR 帖文全文翻译（日期为 2026 年 1 月 18 日）（参考：原始截图 1-4）\n\n“美东时间 1 月 17 日周六中午，骑士[张勇兵]以律师身份探视了[被告]。当天纽约天空阴云密布，空中不时飘落雪花和细雨。由于马杜罗夫妇的到来，MDC（大都会拘留中心）外围的布局与我 2025 年 9 月探视时相比发生了很大变化。周围所有十字路口都设置了铁防护栏。但有一点不仅没有改变，反而增加了，那就是战友们在 MDC 周围的防护网上搭建的支持[被告]的艺术展示。自 2023 年 3 月 15 日[被告]进入 MDC 以来，这样的展示从未中断过。过去，它在西楼朝向自由女神像的那一侧，因为当时[被告]住在西楼。截至目前，由于[被告]已搬至东楼，西侧的展示依然可见，而在正对东楼的入口处，战友们最近搭建了一个非常醒目的横幅，长近十米，高约三米。它是由一束束系在网墙上的五彩小花制成的，带有 G 标志和一行字：‘冬月十三 LOVE GUO’。去年 9 月我探视时，这个横幅还没有。\n\n案件编号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷分录：32.1，第 24 页，共 64 页\n进入大楼后，我迅速办完登记手续，通过安检，进入探视区。我选择了上次与[被告]会面的同一个房间。宽约 1.5 米，长 2 米多。房间里有一张小桌子和四把椅子。桌子上有一台电脑和一个显示器。这是仅有的两间配备电脑的会客室之一，而另一间房间里的电脑显然没有插上电源。我迅速摆放好文件和其他物品，然后从自动售货机买了一些零食和饮料。准备充分后，我坐在房间里，等待[被告]。\n\n不一会儿，[被告]出现在值班台前，一边同带他过来的女警卫交谈，一边朝会客室这边望。看到我时，他笑了。我也走出房间迎接[被告]。[被告]左臂夹着厚厚的一叠文件和一个文件袋，张开了右臂。我也张开双臂，我和[被告]紧紧拥抱在一起。那一刻时间仿佛停止了。我放下双臂，仔细端详着[被告]，然后再次拥抱了他。我心里默念，这个拥抱是代表战友们给的。我们走进房间，[被告]一边放下文件一边微笑着说：‘这个房间成了我的专属了。’我们坐下后，[被告]又说：‘哈哈，真像做梦一样。’\n\n我们边看文件边讨论。[被告]总是滔滔不绝地谈论他对案件、时事、历史、爆料革命等等的看法。[被告]在 MDC 已经呆了近三年。尽管生活在如此难以置信的恶劣环境中，[被告]开创的全球灭共运动却从未停歇片刻。MDC 只不过成了[被告]继续灭共的另一个场所。[被告]告诉我，在 MDC 的每一天，他都牢记要做三件事：\n\n案件编号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷分录：32.1，第 25 页，共 64 页\n第一：为爆料革命和战友们向万千佛菩萨神灵祈祷，一点也不能少；第二：他个人的安全和健康不是他个人的事，而是战友们的事；第三：分秒必争地学习和工作，不浪费一点时间。\n\n在讨论到[被告]的刑事辩护律师最近提交给法院的第 789 号文件时，[被告]非常激动。他说：‘正是在这个房间里，他们的几位律师就坐在你现在坐的这一侧，而我当时就坐在你现在坐的这把椅子上。我们逐字逐句地讨论和推敲。这是一件大事！骑士。’他说任何涉及战友核心利益的事都是大事。我回想起 3 月 15 日在法庭上，检察官大动干戈，向法官宣称：‘鉴于本案中成千上万的受害者’（2023 年 3 月 15 日法庭庭审笔录，第 3 页，第 7-8 行）。然而，在上周返回给法院的关于处置涉案资产的裁定中，完全相同的检察官在第 785 号文件中白纸黑字地写道，截至 2026 年 1 月 9 日，（仅）有 134 人通过法院提交了申请。寄给政府（即检察官）的申请（仅）有 238 份。（‘……案卷中提交了大约 134 份声称依据第 853(n) 条提出的主张。’‘此外，政府已通过邮寄收到大约 238 份声称依据第 853 条提出的主张，……’见第 785 号文件第 3 页最后一行的脚注 3）。难道检察官不应该对如此巨大的差异作出解释吗？\n\n关于那些依靠爆料革命敛取不义之财、获得空前名声，随后离开爆料革命或被爆料革命扫地出门的人，[被告]紧紧盯着我，严厉地说：‘如果这些人当初没有参与爆料革命，他们怎么可能获得这些财富和名声？\n\n案件编号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷分录：32.1，第 26 页，共 64 页\n现在他们离开了爆料革命，他们什么都不是！他们的违法行为必将受到法律追究。’\n\n每次我与[被告]会面甚至通电话，我都觉得自己仿佛置身于一个巨大的磁场中，有无尽的能量推着我前进。我也觉得时间就像在高铁上一样，分别的时刻转瞬即至。[被告]站起身来说：‘走吧，因为房间外面有家属聚集，我不能送你到值班台了，我们只能在这里道别。等他们把我带回去。’我收拾好东西。站起身。再次紧紧拥抱了[被告]。再一次，我感受到了[被告]那铁壁般的身体所带来的力量。[被告]又对我说：‘你出去后，如果外面还有战友，请一定转达\n\n我的问候并向他们表达我的谢意。告诉他们，不要呆在外面，太冷了。说到这里我心里好痛。』\n\n我推开门，走了几步，回头看了看[被告]。他站在那里，微笑着向我挥手。我转过身，大步走向已经为我打开第一道门的值班人员。穿过两道门后，我再次回头，希望能看到[被告]在回去的路上走入我的视线。\n\n特别感谢青藤秘书长以及多位在纽约的战友所提供的后勤支持与准备。”\n\n——————————————————————————–\n\n文件 2：张永兵（Yongbing Zhang）GETTR（盖特）帖文完整译文（日期为 2026年1月28日）（参考：原始截图 5-6）\n\n“美国东部时间 1月26日中午，七哥来到 MDC（大都会拘留中心）探望[被告]。前一天纽约刚下了一场大雪。气温骤降至摄氏零下十多度。MDC 东楼一楼的接见区也弥漫着寒气。他一见到[被告]，便激动地表示，我作为爆料革命（Whistleblower Movement）的战友，给他带来了温暖与力量。在这历史性重大事件发生期间，[被告]更加想念他的姐妹和兄弟们。我们随即谈到了张又侠（Zhang Youxia）先生。[被告]说张将军已经是中华儿女中最伟大的英雄。他正在拯救人类，是一位真正的灭共大英雄。未来，将会有无数个张又侠和刘振立（Liu Zhenli）站出来。越来越多的人将深信：『消灭中共是正义的必须』，这是海东兄在 2020年6月4日宣读新中国联邦（New Federal State of China）宣言时发出的呐喊。\n\n[被告]对青藤秘书长、执行委员会以及各农场兄弟姐妹本周的行动给予了高度评价。让大家继续行动起来。[被告]希望战友们广泛传播真相，唤醒更多海内外同胞认识这一历史事件。首先，必须提出五个问题。1. 张又侠这样做是为了钱吗？2. 他这样做是为了能跑到美国吗？3. 张又侠和刘振立被拿下是因为腐败还是男女关系？4. 张又侠和刘振立这样做的核心目的是什么？5. 美国对张又侠的行动可能有什么反应？\n\n其次，战友们应当关注该事件产生的四大影响。第一：唤醒美国和更多的中国人；第二：张又侠泄露的材料不可能仅仅是核武器数据，由此带来的影响；第三：中国两位最高级别的职业军队将领联合倒戈，预示着将有更多将领站出来；第四：对俄罗斯、金砖国家（BRICS）及中共其他盟友造成的震撼效应。\n\n不知不觉，三个小时过去了。临别之际，我和[被告]紧紧相拥。我能感受到张又侠和刘振立共同灭共事件带给[被告]的力量。尽管天寒地冻，我却能感受到[被告]身上因这股力量而燃烧的烈火！\n\n请战友们观看、传播和推广 1月26日联盟的直播。在直播中，我和其他四位战友（海东兄、三票先生、青藤秘书长、Ava）就上述五个问题和四大影响进行了详细探讨、剖析与评论。\n\n战友们，挺住！爱你们大家！神仙阳谷县大高县！！！”\n\n——————————————————————————–\n\n物证：2026年4月10日公开广播完整文字记录 发言人：安红（An Hong，主持人）、张永兵（Yongbing Zhang，又名“长弓七侠”/“法统”）\n\n主题：关于 3800 万美元 HCHKBVI 公司争议的庭外自认\n\n[完整译文开始]\n\n安红（主持人）：“大家好，今天是澳大利亚东部时间 2026年4月11日，美国东部时间 2026年4月10日下午。今天，首先我想跟各位说，上周由于某些原因，我们推迟了一周。当时，我们也想到正好这周政府那边的文件会出来，所以我和长弓七侠战友[张永兵]约好今天做这一期节目。今天我也想请问七侠战友。首先，因为长弓七侠战友今天出差有公务，在路上不方便露面。因此，我们通过电话连线的方式采访七侠战友。下面，我们请长弓七侠战友跟我们打个招呼。谢谢。”\n\n张永兵（长弓七侠）：“谢谢战友。谢谢安红战友，也谢谢全球所有的战友们。大家无论是在早上还是晚上，或者可能是中午，大家好。今天我们美东时间这边是周末，可能有些战友已经在享受周末了。无论如何，祝大家周末愉快。今天我想谈的话题，绝对是大家非常感兴趣的。所以，我通过这个音频连线，和安红战友聊聊两份重要的法庭文件。今天和安红战友做这个节目，我在这个节目中讨论的内容仅代表我个人的观点。它不代表任何一方，不代表[被告]，也不代表[被告]的律师。这仅仅是我个人的看法，不作为任何法律参考或法律意见。好的。”\n\n张永兵：“安红，我先说一下，今天的主题叫问答，对吧？刚好今天我也可以借这个机会向大家解释一下……向大家解释整件事情是怎么发展的。”\n\n安红：“关于那 3800 万，3800 万。”\n\n张永兵：“对，这 3800 万。对，关于这个……当李雅（Li Ya）[木兰（Mulan）]作证时，她说长弓七侠强迫她签署了一份所谓的假宣誓书。然后，她声称因为他的强迫，她最终产生了自杀的念头。好的。”\n\n安红：“嗯。”\n\n张永兵：“我向大家透露几件事……因为我是亲身经历这件事的人，所以我必须告诉大家。首先，当我发给当时还是战友的木兰，那份她声称是我强迫她签署的文件时……那不仅仅是一份文件。在铁血组（Iron Blood Group）里，当时铁血组的所有成员都在场，我给她发了一条消息，类似于短信，但可能稍长一些。我的意思是，『嘿，属于战友的这 3800 万目前正被 L[受托人 Luc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯宾斯）]盯上，他正企图把它拿走。』我告诉她，从法律角度来看，你可以这样做，因为该公司目前处于法律诉讼程序中。对于这家名为 HCHKBVI 的英属维尔京群岛（BVI）公司，除了[王雁平（Yvette Wang）]是董事之外，另一位董事正是木兰，好的，也就是李雅。她当时是董事，好的。”\n\n“从法律层面讲，这意味着在 2023年7月和8月。木兰是 HCHKBVI 的董事。当时，[王雁平]已经在 MDC 了。木兰在澳大利亚，好的。自然，关于 HCHKBVI 公司有很多文件必须由董事来处理。例如，如果你需要聘请律师来应诉。只有董事才能这么做，所以我告诉她，『你是董事。从法律角度来看，这些事项属于董事的职责范围。』”\n\n“还有非常重要的一点。今天我想给大家爆个大料，或者说，如果大家仔细查看法庭文件，实际上，早在那个时候，实际上在 2023年8月，她就已经与控方合作了……已经与卢克[受托人]合作了。我不知道她当时是否正在与控方合作。”\n\n安红：“嗯。”\n\n张永兵：“如果大家去查她在陪审团面前的听证会上说了什么，也许她那时就已经在与警方配合了。也就是说，当她在做这些事情的时候，当我们要求她保护战友的利益、保护这 3800 [万]的利益时，她实际上已经在私下至少与 L[受托人]握手了。她一直在与他沟通。为什么？为什么？因为我们有 L 的……我们有文件显示，好的，有证据表明，那个时候她就已经在与卢克合作了。而我是什么时候把文件发给木兰的呢？是 2023年9月2日。这意味着，在那时，她已经是 L 的人了。好的。”\n\n“现在我想给大家说一个细节。是什么呢？当我把文件发给木兰时，当我给她发电子邮件时，我发给了她两个文件。一个文件是宣誓书的 PDF 版本。”\n\n安红：“嗯。”\n\n张永兵：“一个文件是宣誓书的 Word 版本，好的。我的用意是告诉她，『这里有两个版本。如果你不同意，你可以直接去修改，因为我给了你 Word 版本。』”\n\n安红：“对。”\n\n张永兵：“对吧？所以根本不存在所谓的……强迫她。我怎么强迫她了？大家用正常人的脑子想想。我在美国，对吧？我们之间有 16 个小时的时差，我怎么强迫她？对吧？那是……对。所以从这一点来看，我不知道她的那些证词都是怎么准备出来的，好的。所以今天，我非常非常高兴有这个机会告诉大家。啊，所以我的名字在第 833 号文件（Document 833）中白纸黑字写得清清楚楚，出现了一次，然后又出现了两次……啊，所以，这是我和大家分享的第二点，或者说是回答你的第二个问题。我不知道我回答得够不够完整，我说话有点激动，可能稍微跑题了。”\n\n[完整译文结束]\n\n关于媒体物证提交的说明：由于法院对通过电子邮件提交的电子归档文件有 10MB 的大小限制，本 7 分钟广播的音频提取件（物证：张永兵的庭外自认）以 .mp3 格式附于本件。原始完整长度的视频文件已妥善保存，并可在法院要求时立即通过实体介质（U盘）提交。\n\nbragey5.dreamhosters.com/提交宣誓书/ Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 34 of 64\nHIMALAYA\nRESTORATION News Update Contact Us FILE AN AFFIDAVIT 提交宣誓书\n我们不再接受新客户。法院要求每位现有客户提交一份宣誓书。请填写右侧表格，立即提交您的宣誓书。\n宣誓书（支持附属或赦免请愿）\nNEW\naccessed using HID#*\nSign HID #*\n通过在上面两次输入我的唯一 HID# 作为我的签名，我在此根据伪证罪处罚规定声明，我已仔细审查以下信息，并且根据美国法律，在我所知及所信范围内，它是真实和正确的：\n1. 索赔人的身份和资格\nA. 我的身份信息由 Himalaya Exchange（喜马拉雅交易所，HEX）安全持有，并可使用上面的 HID# 访问。B. 我根据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 和《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 32.2(c) 条提交本宣誓书，主张我在 United States v. Ho Wan Kwok a/k/a \"Miles Guo\"（美国诉郭文贵，案号 23-cr-118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.，纽约南区)）案中没收财产的合法权益。C. 我是该财产的合法所有者，该财产作为稳定币储备由喜马拉雅交易所持有。我对任何非法活动一无所知，也没有参与其中，我作为无辜投资者以善意获取了我的资产。D. 我授权 FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC 继续代表我行事，积极追索此项索赔，并寻求追回我的 HDO 余额的等值金额，以及与我的 HCN 资产贬值相关的任何相关损失，如下所述。根据银行记录和 HEX 账户，这些购买是在 2021 年 4 月开放后以及美国政府于 2022 年 9 月扣押前进行的。\n2. 没收财产的描述\nA. 没收财产的详细信息存储在 HEX 的账户记录中，包含 Himalaya Dollar（喜马拉雅美元，HDO）稳定币余额和相关的 Himalaya Coin（喜马拉雅币，HCN）余额。作为政府在上述案件中没收行动的一部分，来自喜马拉雅交易所银行账户的数百万美元 HDO 稳定币储备被扣押或冻结。B. 我的 HDO 余额代表一种稳定币投资，旨在作为安全的、与美元挂钩的资产，而我的 HCN 持仓与该平台的交易生态系统相关联。扣押导致这些资产严重贬值并无法访问。C. 政府对 HEX 平台和网站的扣押使我无法访问我的账户信息，但 HEX 已认证我为客户，并提供了 HDO、HCN、存款和赎回的账户价值，我授权我的律师提供这些信息。\n3. 索赔依据\nA. 我的索赔基于对以下财产的合法权益：我是该财产的合法所有者，即扣押的稳定币储备中相当于我的 HDO 余额的美元金额，且我的权利优于政府的没收程序。我的权益优于任何政府索赔，因为我在相关犯罪发生前以善意且在不知晓任何可没收行为的情况下获取了该财产。该财产系合法获取，如 HEX 记录中所详述，包括交易历史、存款和账户对账单，表明我未参与任何被指控的欺诈计划。确立我所有权权益和账户历史的所有文件均存储在 HEX 的记录中，我授权在安全条件下发布。B. 作为 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6) 规定的无辜所有者，我对与该财产相关的任何非法活动一无所知，也没有合理理由相信存在此类活动。正如公开宣传所述，我投资 HEX 是相信其为一家合法的加密货币交易所，提供 HDO（稳定币）和 HCN（交易代币）以实现无国界金融自由。C. 与 HDO 资产相关的具体损失：政府的扣押导致交易所停止赎回，因为其不再拥有储备资金。在没收前，客户能够提交赎回请求并将 HDO 兑换为美元。我寻求从喜马拉雅交易所被扣押的美元储备资金中追回相当于我的 HDO 余额（作为稳定资产）的等值金额。D. 与 HCN 资产相关的具体损失：政府的扣押以及随之而来的 HCN（喜马拉雅币）贬值造成了直接的财务损害。在没收前，HCN 作为 HEX 生态系统的一部分具有价值，但该平台的交易停止和资产冻结导致了价值损失。我寻求政府赔偿我 HCN 余额损失的补偿性损害赔偿金，按喜马拉雅交易所暂停交易时的市场价格计算。\n4. 遵守没收程序\nA. 我按照 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2) 要求的法定截止日期提交此索赔。B. 我请求法院根据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(4)-(5) 和 Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c) 的规定安排附属听证会，以裁决我的索赔，出示我的无辜所有权证据，并对没收对我资产的适用性提出异议。C. 如果法院拒绝此附属请愿，我提交以下陈述，以支持根据 28 C.F.R. Part 9（规范行政、民事和刑事没收的减免或缓解的法规）向司法部提交的减免请愿。我是一名无辜所有者，对没收财产享有合法的财务权益，系在不知悉欺诈的情况下取得。我请求司法部行使其自由裁量权，批准没收的减免或缓解，并指出没收程序最初并非设计用于处理像 HEX 这样的海外加密货币交易所，导致对无辜用户造成不成比例的损害。我请求返还 HEX 持有的所有资金，包括我 HDO 余额的等值金额，且不使用索赔管理人以节省成本并提高效率。我未被喜马拉雅交易所欺诈。唯一造成的损失是由政府扣押和行动所致，导致交易所停止交易。\n5. 请求的救济\nA. 我在此附属请愿下恭敬地请求法院：确认我作为无辜第三方的有效且优越的财产权益；将我主张权利的财产排除在政府的没收令之外，包括释放相当于我 HDO 余额的等值美元；并给予法院认为公正和适当的任何其他救济，例如举行证据听证会或对 HEX 记录进行证据开示以核实我的索赔。B. 如果法院不批准此附属请愿，请将此作为美国司法部减免程序下的返还与减免请愿予以接受。我请求不使用索赔管理人以节省成本。鉴于该交易所的海外性质以及潜在的隐私和其他严重风险，我授权根据司法部与 HEX 同意的条款并在采取最严格安全程序以保护我信息的前提下提供访问权限。我寻求完全减免，包括我的\n6. 授权\nA. 我授权 HEX 向法院、政府或指定的第三方提供我的账户信息以供审查，但须遵守保护条件以确保我的身份不被公开，从而保护我的安全。B. 我授权 FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC 代表我的法律权益，继续追索索赔，并在所有相关程序中代表我行事。C. 我授权法院、政府或指定的第三方直接或通过 HEX 协调的第三方返还资金。我理解最终程序将由法院批准，我请求其考虑资产的加密货币性质（例如，按扣押时的价值转换为法定货币等值物以减轻损失）。\n我根据伪证罪处罚规定声明，前述信息在我所知及所信范围内是真实、正确和完整的。输入 HID# 并选择“提交”，即表明我确认我的身份，并授权通过我的 HEX 账户记录核实此声明。\nSubmit\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 35 of 64\n2026/3/26 喜马拉雅农场联盟委员会通知\n关于紧急提交喜马拉雅交易所宣誓书的通知\n🚨\n“请参加了 2023 年和 2024 年喜马拉雅交易所集体诉讼的 6,512 名投资者，尽快通过以下链接提交宣誓书。”\n🚨\n忘记自己是否已经提交的人可以再次提交，这不会影响此前提交的有效性。\n宣誓书链接：http\n宣誓书/\n请将此通知转发给所有农场，并请投资者互相转告。\n🚨\n“喜马拉雅农场联盟执行委员会，2026 年 3 月 25 日”\n🚨\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 36 of 64\n我们不再接受新客户。法院要求每位现有客户提交一份宣誓书。请填写右侧表格并立即提交您的宣誓书。\nNEW 宣誓书（支持附属或减免请愿）\n**使用 HID# *** 访问\n**签署 HID # ***\n通过在上方两次输入我的唯一 HID# 作为我的签名，我在此根据伪证罪处罚规定声明，我已仔细审查以下信息，并且根据美国法律，在我所知及所信范围内，它是真实和正确的：\n1. 索赔人的身份和资格\nA. 我的身份信息由喜马拉雅交易所（HEX）安全持有，并可使用上方的 HID# 访问。\nB. 我根据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 和《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 32.2(c) 条提交本宣誓书，主张我在 United States v. Ho Wan Kwok a/k/a \"Miles Guo\"（案号 23-cr-118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.)）案中没收财产的合法权益。\nC. 我是该财产的合法所有者，该财产作为稳定币储备由喜马拉雅交易所持有。我对任何非法活动一无所知，也未参与其中，\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 37 of 64\n我作为无辜投资者以善意获取了我的资产。\nD. 我授权 FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC 继续代表我行事，积极追索此项索赔，并寻求追回我的 HDO 余额的等值金额，以及与我的 HCN 资产贬值相关的任何相关损失，如下所述。根据银行记录和 HEX 账户，这些购买是在其于 2021 年 4 月开放后以及美国政府于 2022 年 9 月扣押前进行的。\n2. 没收财产的描述\nA. 没收财产的详细信息存储在 HEX 的账户记录中，包含喜马拉雅美元（HDO）稳定币余额和相关的喜马拉雅币（HCN）余额。作为政府在上述案件中没收行动的一部分，来自喜马拉雅交易所银行账户的数百万美元 HDO 稳定币储备被扣押或冻结。\nB. 我的 HDO 余额代表一种稳定币投资，旨在作为安全的、与美元挂钩的资产，而我的 HCN 持仓与该平台的交易生态系统相关联。扣押导致这些资产严重贬值并无法访问。\nC. 政府对 HEX 平台和网站的扣押使我无法访问我的账户信息，但 HEX 已认证我为客户，并提供了 HDO、HCN、存款和\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 38 of 64\n赎回的账户价值。我授权我的律师提供这些信息。\n3. 索赔依据\nA. 我的索赔基于对以下财产的合法权益：我是该财产的合法所有者，即扣押的稳定币储备中相当于我的 HDO 余额的美元金额，且我的权利优于政府的没收程序。我的权益优于任何政府主张，因为我在相关犯罪发生前以善意且在不知晓任何可没收行为的情况下获取了该财产。该财产系合法获取，如 HEX 记录中所详述，包括交易历史、存款和账户对账单，表明我未参与任何被指控的欺诈计划。确立我所有权权益和账户历史的所有文件均存储在 HEX 记录中，我授权在安全条件下发布这些文件。\nB. 作为 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6) 项下的无辜所有者，我对与该财产相关的任何非法活动一无所知，也没有合理理由相信存在此类活动。正如公开宣传所述，我投资 HEX 是相信其为一家合法的加密货币交易所，提供 HDO（稳定币）和 HCN（交易代币）以实现无国界金融自由。\nC. 与 HDO 资产相关的具体损失：政府的扣押导致交易所停止赎回，因为其不再拥有储备\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 39 of 64\n资金。在没收前，客户能够提交赎回请求并将 HDO 兑换为美元。我寻求从喜马拉雅交易所被扣押的美元储备资金中追回相当于我的 HDO 余额（作为稳定资产）的等值金额。\nD. 与 HCN 资产相关的具体损失：政府的扣押以及随之而来的 HCN（喜马拉雅币）贬值造成了直接的财务损害。在没收前，HCN 作为 HEX 生态系统的一部分具有价值，但该平台的交易停止和资产冻结导致了价值损失。我寻求政府赔偿我 HCN 余额损失的补偿性损害赔偿金，按喜马拉雅交易所暂停交易时的市场价格计算。\n4. 遵守没收程序\nA. 我按照 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2) 要求的法定截止日期提交此索赔。\nB. 我请求法院根据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(4)-(5) 和 Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c) 的规定安排附属听证会，以裁决我的索赔，出示我的无辜所有权证据，并对没收对我资产的适用性提出异议。\nC. 如果法院拒绝此附属请愿，我提交以下陈述，以支持根据 28 C.F.R. Part 9（规范行政、民事和刑事没收的减免或缓解的法规）向司法部提交的减免请愿。我是一名无辜所有者，享有\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 40 of 64\n没收财产的合法财务权益，系在不知悉欺诈的情况下取得。我请求司法部行使其自由裁量权，批准没收的减免或缓解，并指出没收程序最初并非设计用于处理像 HEX 这样的海外加密货币交易所，导致对无辜用户造成不成比例的损害。我请求返还 HEX 持有的所有资金，包括我 HDO 余额的等值金额，且不使用索赔管理人以节省成本并提高效率。我未被喜马拉雅交易所欺诈。唯一造成的损失是由政府扣押和行动所致，导致交易所停止交易。\n5. 请求的救济\nA. 我在此附属请愿下恭敬地请求法院：确认我作为无辜第三方的有效且优越的财产权益；将我主张权利的财产排除在政府的没收令之外，包括释放相当于我 HDO 余额的等值美元；并给予法院认为公正和适当的任何其他救济，例如举行证据听证会或对 HEX 记录进行证据开示以核实我的索赔。\nB. 如果法院不批准此附属请愿，请将此作为美国司法部减免程序下的返还与减免请愿予以接受。我请求不使用索赔管理人以节省成本。我授权根据司法部与 HEX 同意的条款提供访问权限，\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 41 页，共 64 页\n鉴于该交易所的境外性质，采用最严格的安全程序保护我的信息。如果法院驳回此附随申请，根据 28 C.F.R. Part 9 以及潜在的隐私和其他严重风险，我提交以下声明以支持向司法部（Department of Justice）提交的减免（remission）申请。我请求全额减免，包括我的……\n6. 授权\nA. 我授权 HEX 将我的账户信息提供给法院、政府或指定的第三方进行审查，但须遵守保护性条件以确保我的身份不被公开，从而保护我的安全。\nB. 我授权 FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC 代表我的合法利益，继续主张索赔，并在所有相关程序中代表我行事。\nC. 我授权法院、政府或指定的第三方直接或通过 HEX 协调的第三方退还资金。我理解最终程序将由法院批准，我请求法院考虑资产的加密货币性质（例如，按扣押时的价值折算为等值法币以减少损失）。\n我声明，在接受伪证罪处罚的前提下，据我所知和所信，上述信息均真实、准确且完整。通过输入我的 HID# 并点击“提交”，我确认自己的身份，并授权通过我的 HEX 账户记录核实本声明。\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 42 页，共 64 页\n提交\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 43 页，共 64 页\n[译员注：中文音频证据 2A 的真实准确英译文（时长：1分39秒）]\nForest Zhou（政府证人）：这算是一个重要通知。\n佳佳（Jiajia）：对，没错。本来这应该通知到 1800 名债权人的，但现在只通知了少数人。所以现在，联盟（Alliance）站出来弥补这个信息差……\nAva Chen：……把这个信息差传达给所有已经是债权人的战友们。因为没有人会天天盯着这个看，考虑到有五六千份[文件]和 400 多起破产对抗性诉讼（adversary proceedings）。所以没人会每天在键盘上敲着查文件。这直接关乎债权人的潜在利益。是的，因为这些费用将从债务人郭文贵先生的资产中扣除。所以这会影响到分配给所有债权人的剩余资金。如果您感兴趣，请关注联盟即将发布的公告。\nForest Zhou：为了防止别有用心的人断章取义，我们这里有一个免责声明……它只是声明联盟在此协助每一位战友、每一位债权人……分享我们咨询众多律师后获得的汇总信息……这是我们的免责声明，对吧？截图里不会包含免责声明。\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 44 页，共 64 页\n[译员注：中文音频证据 2C 的真实准确英译文（时长：4分13秒）]\nAva Chen：我来简要解释一下这是什么。最近，我们康涅狄格州的破产案件有了一些最新进展……因为法院文件没有送达给大约 1800 名债权人中的每一位，只有少数债权人收到了通知，所以我们想在这里通知大家。如果你是已经登记为债权人的战友……并且有兴趣了解这项关于支付受托人（Trustee）费用的最新动议……联盟将在这里协助协调大家，翻译一些文件，并分享最新信息。\n您可以立即联系您的农场主（Farm Owner）或 CEO……提交异议的截止日期是美东时间 4 月 17 日……联盟暂定于美东时间明晚举行一次情况说明会……\nForest Zhou：其实我想在这里补充一点……受托人……已经烧掉了七八千万……我们提供这些协助是为了让大家都了解这个过程……如果你有这个意愿，联盟会协助大家。\nAva Chen：我想补充的是，在我们的直播结束后，我们将发布一份联盟公告……包含中英文双语版本。\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 45 页，共 64 页\n案号：1:23-cr-00118-AT\n证据 N\n证据 N：一段伪造的监狱电话 AI 伪造录音，涉及微波炉事件和圣诞大餐，旨在曲解监狱环境。\n[密封并单方归档（Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte）]\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 46 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 47 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 48 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 49 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 50 页，共 64 页\n案号：1:23-cr-00118-AT\n证据 O\n证据 O：一段 AI 伪造录音（2025 年 5 月），内容为青藤（Qingteng）推广 TDCCP 加密货币并散布关于荒谬监狱生活的捏造叙述。\n[密封并单方归档]\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 51 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 52 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 53 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 54 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 55 页，共 64 页\n案号：1:23-cr-00118-AT\n证据 P\n证据 P：视频直播（2025 年 8 月 18 日），内容为青藤和佳佳协调提交请愿书，以协助控方的资产没收目标。\n[密封并单方归档]\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 56 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 57 页，共 64 页\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). 增值税号 119597575.\n注册办事处：20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. 英国.\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 58 页，共 64 页\n案号：1:23-cr-00118-AT\n证据 Z\n证据 Z：官方庭审记录（Dkt. 833），记录了控方通过将“劫持者（Hijackers）”的犯罪行为归咎于被告以证明量刑合理性的栽赃行为。\n[密封并单方归档]\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 59 页，共 64 页\n\n一家人在其一个女儿婚礼上的照片，其中受托人的三个女儿被画了红圈10：\n（GX 1B124F；另见 Tr. 4717）。\n除了针对并企图恐吓受托人及其家人之外，郭还指使他人以其他方式阻碍法院诉讼程序。当李亚（Ya Li）收到破产受托人的传票时，郭让她“把它扔进垃圾桶”，而她照办了，因为她相信了郭所说的美国司法部已被“中共武器化”。（Tr. 1498-99）。关于 G 集团企业（G Enterprise）在郭被捕后仍试图将资产置于破产受托人触及范围之外的行径，张永兵（Yongbing Zhang）——即在 G|CLUBS“抽奖活动”中“赢得”一辆兰博基尼的律师兼共谋者，且在郭被捕羁押后仍继续与郭在 MDC 会面的律师——要求李亚签署一份虚假宣誓书，以便在其中一起破产诉讼中提交。（Tr. 1523-29；GX VI 66）。当她拒绝时，张以 3800 万美元的赔偿责任威胁李女士。（Tr. 1530）。在受到郭的律师的这一威胁后，李女士曾试图自杀。（Tr. 1530-31）。\n最近，郭的企业继续骚扰和威胁反对它的人。2026 年 3 月 10 日，在一名受害者提供给政府的一段视频中，郭的新中国联邦（NFSC）主播要求郭剩余的追随者向郭的法院指定律师提供陈述。此外，该主播还表示，此前提供陈述的 126 名受害者“都必须承担后果”。（Dkt. 832，陈述 206-B（翻译件））。\n这似乎指的是 2024 年 11 月 22 日向法院提交的 126 份受害者陈述。（Dkt. 477）。\n3. 郭被捕后的妨碍行为\n即使在被捕之后，郭仍从事了妨碍行为。郭的犯罪企业在其被捕后继续运作，并且在该企业迁往阿联酋（UAE）——脱离美国执法部门的管辖范围——后，郭继续指挥它。（PSR ¶¶ 103-105）。在他被捕后，郭的\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 60 页，共 64 页\n\n案号：26-1296，06/15/2026，案卷条目：32.1，第 61 页，共 64 页\n\n追随者们试图在 Mahwah Mansion（马沃大宅）伪造证据，使其看起来像是 G|CLUBS 的财产，而非郭的个人家庭住宅。（PSR ¶¶ 91-95）。同样，在郭被捕后，郭的得力亲信之一「Brother Long Island（长岛哥）」指示 Ya Li（李亚）等人删除手机中的证据，以防他们被捕。11（Tr. 1500-02）。\n\nIV. VICTIM STATEMENTS（受害者陈述）\n\n迄今为止，政府已收到并向法院提交了总计约 225 份受害者影响陈述。这些陈述反映了郭对遍布全美的数百名受害者造成的极端伤害，这些伤害包括极度的经济困难、精神痛苦、家庭关系破裂以及产生包括自杀在内的自残念头。\n\n具体而言，2024年11月22日，政府提交了一封附有约 126 份受害者陈述的信函。（Dkt. 477）。2024年12月11日，政府提交了其收到的另外七份受害者陈述。Dkt. 482。2025年1月2日和2025年1月3日，政府共提交了另外 16 份受害者陈述。（Dkts. 486, 487）。法院已将包含前述陈述的案卷条目 477、482、486 和 487 予以封存。2026年4月7日，政府在封存状态下又提交了 74 份陈述。（Dkt. 832）。鉴于法院此前的裁定，这些附信作为证据附件在封存状态下提交给法院。12\n\n为方便法院审理，政府将向法院法官办公室提供所有这些受害者影响陈述的纸质副本。\n\n11 在郭被捕之前，郭本人曾指示李亚等人删除手机中的证据。（Tr. 1500-02）。\n\n12 政府认为，作为本次提交文件的附件 A 予以封存的 Docket 477 处的附信，应当在公开案卷上归档。该附信不包含任何受害者的个人身份信息。它仅总结了截至该日期收到的某些陈述。因此，政府谨请求许可在公开案卷上提交该信函。\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 62 of 64\n\n通过郭复杂的欺诈、洗钱和敲诈勒索集团所犯下的罪行——或者由本法院主持的审判中公正陪审团所作出的裁决。\n\n在评估特别威慑和保护公众方面，法院应重点考量被告从未对其真正令人愤慨且公然的欺诈行为承担责任。但郭对责任的推卸远不止于此。被告有权主张无罪，但郭更进一步：他虚假地声称自己是受害者。他企图诋毁将他绳之以法的法治。这种愤慨态度，加上郭毫无根据地暗示本案起诉存在不当行为，理应受到严厉判决。参见，例如，Raniere 案，Dkt. 966，第 16 页（「更糟糕的是，[被告]及其律师……正在进行一场公关活动，以对司法系统的公正性和陪审团裁决提出质疑。」）。\n\n第三，或许最令人不安的是，在郭被监禁的三年间，郭及其集团仍在继续进行犯罪活动。在其被捕并被羁押后，郭继续指挥其集团转移至阿拉伯联合酋长国（UAE），处于美国执法管辖范围之外。（PSR ¶¶ 103-105）。监测郭及其残余追随者网络言论的受害者进一步说明了郭如何继续运作其集团，并利用该集团压制受害者使其不敢发声指控他：\n\n• 「根据 New Federal State of China（新中国联邦，简称 NFSC）秘书长 Yue Zhou（周悦）在每周五的『直到我们再次相遇』节目中所述，他和另外几名关键成员每周都会探视 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）。NFSC 目前正在执行的许多指令都已获得郭的批准。」Dkt. 832, Stmt. 214。\n\n• 「尽管郭文贵被捕，但该诈骗团伙并未被瓦解。与其相关的农场仍在运作，郭文贵仍在狱中指挥成员，指示他们继续诈骗并威胁受害者。此外，诈骗团伙成员潜伏在不同国家，仍在继续进行诈骗、洗钱并掩盖犯罪。」Dkt. 832, Stmt. 188。\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 63 of 64\n\nUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\nFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT（美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院）\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK（美国纽约南区联邦地区法院）\n\n事由：BAO CHU（储宝），\n上诉案号：26-1296\n申请人。\n地区法院案号：1:23-cr-00118-AT\n尊敬的 Analisa Torres 法官\n\nCERTIFICATE OF OMNIBUS SERVICE（综合送达证明书）\n\n我，Bao Chu（储宝），Pro Se（自行辩护），特依据 28 U.S.C. § 1746 在受伪证罪处罚的前提下证明，于2026年6月15日，我送达了「EMERGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE SENTENCING MEMORANDUM (DKT. 833) IN ITS ENTIRETY, COMPEL A RULE 104 EVIDENTIARY (FATICO) HEARING, AND ISSUE RULE 17(c) SUBPOENAS（关于全盘撤销判决备忘录(DKT. 833)、强制启动规则104证据(FATICO)听证会并签发规则17(c)传票的紧急动议）」的真实正确副本，以及 Form T-1080 Motion Information Statement（动议信息声明表）和十（10）份客观证据附件（附件 1 至 10）。\n\n送达同时通过电子邮件进行，以确保即时收到并严格满足对所有记录在案的当事人及法定监督实体的综合送达要求：\n\n1. 上诉法院（第二巡回法院）\nClerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit（美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院书记官）\n电子邮件：prosecases@ca2.uscourts.gov\n\n2. 地区法院（纽约南区）\nHon. Analisa Torres, U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.（美国纽约南区联邦地区法院 Analisa Torres 法官）\n电子邮件：Torres_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov；ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov\n\n3. 美国法律顾问（检方）\nMicah Fergenson, Ryan Finkel, Juliana Murray, Justin Horton\nAssistant United States Attorneys, S.D.N.Y.（纽约南区联邦助理检察官）\n电子邮件：micah.fergenson@usdoj.gov；ryan.finkel@usdoj.gov；juliana.murray@usdoj.gov；justin.horton@usdoj.gov\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 64 of 64\n\n4. 被告法律顾问（辩方）\nJohn F. Kaley, Esq.（律师）\n电子邮件：jkaley@doarlaw.com\n（以及通过 ECF/电子邮件关联的所有相关记录在案的辩护律师）\n\n5. 法定监督实体（依据 28 U.S.C. § 1651）\nDOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG) & Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR)（美国司法部监察长办公室及专业责任办公室）\nU.S. House Judiciary Committee (Select Subcommittee on Weaponization)（美国众议院司法委员会（联邦政府武器化特别小组委员会））\n\n我谨在受伪证罪处罚的前提下声明，上述内容属实且正确。\n\n于2026年6月15日签署。\n\n谨此提交，\n\n/s/ Bao Chu\nBao Chu（储宝）\n自行辩护申请人 /\n善意第三方财产所有人\n诉讼资格已通过纽约南区 HID 确认：\nF56BDDZ","key_entities":["Guo","Himalaya","forfeiture","Kwok","853(n)","CIPA","Himalaya Exchange","CCP","Ho Wan Kwok","Finkel","Fergenson","Murray","Miles Guo","GETTR","Pro Se","pro se","Despins","Torres","Analisa Torres","Horton","Kaley","853(i)","CVRA","Crime Victim"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":1,"court":"2Cir"},{"doc_number":2,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":14,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":312,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":477,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":482,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":832,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":833,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":966,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":10693,"status":"published","published_at":"2026-05-22 00:00:00","created_at":"2026-05-22","updated_at":"2026-08-23 09:32:18"}