{"id":"court_2cir_26-1296_dkt_32","court":"2Cir","case_no":"26-1296","doc_number":32,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"MOTION","filed_date":"2026-05-22","title":"Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 1 of 64 Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 2 of 64","summary_zh":"紧急动议 —— 美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo）案，2Cir 26-1296 ECF #32（2026-05-22立案）。善意第三方财产所有人 Bao Chu 自行提请动议，请求全面剔除检方的量刑备忘录（Dkt. 833），强制召开《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第32(i)(2)条及证据规则第104条规定的 Fatico 证据听证会，并签发第17(c)条传票。动议主张检方备忘录存在时间线不实、将独立第三方企业行为不当归咎于被告以及违规提取投资者识别码等问题。","summary_en":"Emergency motion — United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo), 2Cir 26-1296 ECF #32 (filed 2026-05-22). Bona fide third-party property owner Bao Chu moves pro se to strike the Government's sentencing memorandum (Dkt. 833) in its entirety, compel a Rule 32(i)(2) and Rule 104 Fatico evidentiary hearing, and issue Rule 17(c) subpoenas. The motion alleges the prosecution's sentencing filing contains fabricated timelines, improper attribution of corporate conduct, and unlawful use of investor identification codes.","body_en":"Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 1 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 2 of 64\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nPlaintiff,\nCase No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT\n-v-\nHO WAN KWOK, et al.,\nDefendants.\nEMERGENCY MOTION TO STRIKE SENTENCING\nMEMORANDUM (DKT. 833) IN ITS ENTIRETY, COMPEL\nA FED. R. CRIM. P. 32(i)(2) AND RULE 104\nEVIDENTIARY (FATICO) HEARING, AND ISSUE RULE\n17(c) SUBPOENAS\nI.STATUTORYMANDATEANDSUPREMECOURTPRECE-\nDENT\nPursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(2), the Court is under a\nstrict statutory mandate to rule on any disputed portion of the presentence report\nor other controverted matter.\nApplicant hereby introduces seven (7) certified, objective exhibits establishing\nthat the Government’s Sentencing Memorandum (Dkt. 833) is predicated upon the\nknowinguseoffabricatedevidenceandphysicalimpossibilities,directlytriggering\nthe constitutional prohibition established in Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959).\nThe Court must convene a Fatico evidentiary hearing; failure to do so upon the\n1\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 3 of 64\npresentation of unassailable physical records constitutes a structural Due Process\nviolation.\nII. ABSOLUTE PHYSICAL IMPOSSIBILITY OF THE GOV-\nERNMENT’S TIMELINE (NAPUE VIOLATION)\nIn Dkt. 833 (p. 68), the Prosecution alleges the Defendant “continued to di-\nrect” extrajudicial operations via telephone from the Metropolitan Detention Cen-\nter (MDC) at 16:48 EST on March 15, 2023. This assertion is objectively annihilated\nby the Government’s own records:\n1. Court Transcript (Exhibit 1): Official Docket 14 objectively establishes that\nat exactly 16:55 EST on March 15, 2023, the Defendant was physically present\nbeforeU.S.MagistrateJudgeKatharineH.Parker. Itisphysicallyimpossibleto\nexecuteadirectivephonecallfromtheMDCwhileconcurrentlyappearingin\na federal courtroom.\n2. OfficialBOPTRUVIEWLogs(Exhibit2): Officialprisonlogs(Dkt. 312-3,Bates\nNo. USAO_00297003) conclusively prove the Defendant possessed zero autho-\nrized telephone contacts prior to March 28, 2023. The Prosecution’s inten-\ntional submission of a narrative that materially conflicts with its own Bureau\nofPrisonsphysicallogsconstitutesprosecutorialmisconductandFraudonthe\nCourt.\nIII.FRAUDULENTATTRIBUTIONOFINDEPENDENTCOR-\nPORATE CONDUCT\nTheProsecutionassertsinDkt. 833thattheDefendantcreatedthe“TDCCP”dig-\nitalcurrencytofundlegaldefense. Thisreliesentirelyonextrajudicialproxiesand\nAI-forged audio (Exhibit 7).\n1. NY DOS Corporate Registration (Exhibit 3): Objective public records (DOS\nID: 7518505) prove that “ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC,” the issuing entity of\n2\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 4 of 64\nTDCCP, was unilaterally registered and operated by Government witness For-\nrest Zhou (Yoe Zhou) on January 27, 2025.\n2. Ontario Superior Court Order (Exhibit 4): Case No. CV-25-00753415-0000\n(dated May 22, 2026) objectively records that this same entity independently\ninitiated civil litigation and was ordered to pay $53,000 CAD in adverse costs.\nAttributingtheindependent,legallydocumentedactionsofaGovernmentwit-\nness’s registered corporation to the incarcerated Defendant violates the Sixth\nAmendment Confrontation Clause.\nIV.PERJURYCONTRADICTEDBYEDITABLEDOCUMENT\nTRANSMISSION\nTheProsecutionreliesonthetestimonyofYaLi,claimingshewassubjectedtoa\n“threatof$38millioninliability”constituting“violentcoercion”byYongbingZhang\nto sign an affidavit (Dkt. 833, pp. 27-28).\nThe Editable Document Paradox (Exhibit 5): An extrajudicial public admis-\nsion by Yongbing Zhang on April 10, 2026, objectively establishes that he transmit-\nted both a PDF and a fully editable Word document to Ya Li, explicitly instructing\nher to modify the contents if she disagreed. The physical provision of an editable\ndraft is mutually exclusive with the legal definition of “coercion.”\nV. MASS IDENTITY THEFT AND THE DOCTRINE OF PER-\nVASIVE TAINT\nTheProsecutionseeksextremesentencingenhancementsbyalleging“thousands\nof victims,” while the docket contains only approximately 225 physical statements.\nPhishingandHIDTheft(Exhibit6): Objectivelogsprovetheproxyentityestab-\nlished a phishing website (bragey5.dreamhosters.com) to unlawfully extract Court-\n3\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 5 of 64\nassignedHIDCodesfrom6,512investors. TheProsecution’ssubsequentuseofthese\nstolenidentifierstoadministrativelyinflatethevictimrosterunder21U.S.C.§853(i)\nRemission,overridingtheinvestors’explicitdisclaimersofvictimhood,violatesthe\nCrime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) and triggers the Doctrine of Pervasive Taint.\nVI. RELIEF REQUESTED\nPursuanttotheobjectiveevidentiarymatrixprovidedherein,Applicantdemands\nthe Court:\n1. ImmediatelyissueRule17(c)subpoenastotheBOPforcompleteMDCtelecom-\nmunication and visitation logs.\n2. CompelaFed. R.Crim. P.32(i)(2)andRule104FaticoHearingtoadversarially\ntest the physical impossibilities present in Dkt. 833.\n3. Strike Dkt. 833 in its entirety due to objective, documented Napue violations.\nRespectfully submitted,\n/s/ Bao Chu\nBao Chu\nProceeding Pro Se /\nBona Fide Third-Party Property Owner\nS.D.N.Y. HID: F56BDDZ\nDated: June 15, 2026\n4\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 6 of 64\n\nN3F5kwoA\n1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n2 ------------------------------x\n3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, New York, N.Y.\n4 v. 23 Cr. 118 (AT)(KHP)\n5 HO WAN KWOK,\n6 Defendant.\n7 ------------------------------x\n8 March 15, 2023\n4:55 p.m.\n9\n10 Before:\n11 HON. KATHARINE H. PARKER,\n12 U.S. Magistrate Judge\n13\n14 APPEARANCES\n15 DAMIAN WILLIAMS\nUnited States Attorney for the\n16 Southern District of New York\nBY: RYAN B. FINKEL\n17 JULIANA MURRAY\nMICAH FERGENSON\n18 Assistant United States Attorneys\n19 FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF NEW YORK\nAttorneys for Defendant\n20 BY: TAMARA L. GIWA\n21\nALSO PRESENT: LILY LAU, Mandarin Interpreter\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 7 of 64\n\nN3F5kwoA\n1 (Case called)\n2 THE DEPUTY CLERK: Beginning with the government,\n3 please make your appearance for the record.\n4 MR. FINKEL: Good afternoon, your Honor. Ryan Finkel,\n5 Juliana Murray, Micah Fergenson for the United States. We are\n6 joined at counsel table by Geoffrey Mearns, who is a paralegal\n7 in our office.\n8 THE DEPUTY CLERK: Counsel for Mr. Kwok, please make\n9 your appearance for the record.\n10 MS. GIWA: Federal Defenders of New York by Tamara\n11 Giwa appearing today for Mr. Miles Guo. Good afternoon, your\n12 Honor.\n13 THE COURT: Good afternoon. And good afternoon\n14 Mr. Kwok.\n15 THE DEFENDANT: (In English) Your Honor, good\n16 afternoon.\n17 THE COURT: I'm Judge Parker.\n18 Before we get started, Mr. Kwok, I want to make sure\n19 that you can understand and hear the interpreter.\n20 THE DEFENDANT: (In English) Yes, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: The purpose of today's proceeding is to\n22 inform you of certain rights that you have, to inform you of\n23 the charges against you, to consider whether counsel should be\n24 appointed for you, and decide under what conditions, if any,\n25 you shall be released pending trial.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 8 of 64\n\nEXHIBIT C\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 9 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 10 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 11 of 64\n\nDate: 04/04/2024 Location: DC\nFederal Bureau of Prisons\nTime: 09:04 AM\nTRUVIEW\nInmate Center Report\nSensitive But Unclassified\nContact Contact\nCreation Date Last Change Date Loc Status Phone First Nm Last Nm AlertedBlock Description\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM BRO Active Samu Samu No\n3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM 3/13/2024 2:22:24 PM BRO Active Kaili Kaili No\n3/13/2024 2:07:21 PM 3/13/2024 2:07:21 PM BRO Active Pallan Pallan No\n9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM 9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM BRO Active Dan Dan New Lawyer No\n9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM 9/14/2023 5:52:19 PM BRO Active Dan Dan New Lawyer No\n8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM 8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM BRO Active May Goo No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM BRO Active Mn Mn No\n5/3/2023 1:37:17 PM 5/3/2023 1:37:17 PM BRO Active May Q No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive On On No\n8/4/2023 3:22:21 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Number New Umber No\n8/4/2023 3:22:21 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Number New Umber No\n3/31/2023 8:07:15 AM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Cangtian Op No\n2/1/2024 8:52:16 AM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Vicky V No\n4/1/2023 1:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Wy Wy No\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Ml Ml No\n8/9/2023 6:22:17 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Mn Mn No\n3/28/2023 1:37:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Number New Number No\n8/16/2023 7:52:18 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New New New New No\n12/10/2023 12:37:23 PM3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Jet Li No\n8/4/2023 1:22:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Kk Kk No\n8/8/2023 9:07:20 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive New Jersey Jersey No\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Wen Guo No\n8/11/2023 12:22:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive E E No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Cathy Cathy No\n8/11/2023 12:07:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Cathy Cathy No\n8/11/2023 12:22:22 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive C C No\nUUsseerr IIDD:: TF57175 Page 3 of6\nUSAO_00297003\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 12 of 64\n\nDate: 04/04/2024 Location: DC\nFederal Bureau of Prisons\nTime: 09:04 AM\nTRUVIEW\nInmate Center Report\nSensitive But Unclassified\nContact Contact\nCreation Date Last Change Date Loc Status Phone First Nm Last Nm AlertedBlock Description\n8/21/2023 7:07:23 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive C C No\n3/31/2023 2:52:19 PM 3/13/2024 1:52:23 PM BRO Inactive Ab Ab No\n3/20/2023 8:52:14 AM 8/29/2023 6:07:21 PM BRO Inactive May Goo No\n8/9/2023 5:52:16 PM 8/9/2023 6:22:17 PM BRO Inactive Mn Mn No\n6/13/2023 9:22:18 PM 6/14/2023 6:22:25 PM BRO Inactive Qing Zhi No\n3/21/2023 7:22:14 AM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive Bing Zhang No\n3/16/2023 6:52:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive No\n3/16/2023 6:52:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive No\n4/1/2023 1:52:16 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive Ru Shui No\n3/21/2023 7:22:14 AM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive Si Qi No\n3/28/2023 1:37:19 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive An P No\n4/22/2023 8:07:18 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive S Best No\n4/22/2023 8:07:18 PM 5/21/2023 9:22:15 AM BRO Inactive S Best No\nCalls\nContact Contact\nStart Date Loc Completed Duration Phone First Nm Last Nm City St Country\n4/4/2024 8:32:53 AM BRO Yes 15 X X\n4/4/2024 7:03:14 AM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n4/3/2024 2:42:12 PM BRO Yes 8 Gw W\n4/2/2024 1:22:26 PM BRO Yes 13 Gw W\n4/2/2024 12:04:25 PM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n4/1/2024 2:29:57 PM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n3/20/2024 6:52:40 PM BRO Yes 15 Gw W\n3/20/2024 5:12:44 PM BRO Yes 1 Gw W\n3/20/2024 1:20:58 PM BRO Yes 3 Gw W\n3/19/2024 6:48:48 PM BRO Yes 4 Gw W\nUUsseerr IIDD:: TF57175 Page 4 of6\nUSAO_00297004\nCONFIDENTIAL\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 13 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 14 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 15 of 64\n\nmeet in the MDC following his arrest and detention—asked Ya Li to sign a false affidavit for filing\nin one of the bankruptcy litigations. (Tr. 1523-29; GX VI 66). When she refused, Zhang threatened\nMs. Li with $38 million in liability. (Tr. 1530). After this threat from Guo’s attorney, Ms. Li\ncontemplated suicide. (Tr. 1530-31).\nMore recently, Guo’s enterprise continues to harass and threaten those that oppose it. On\nMarch 10, 2026, in a video provided to the Government by a victim, Guo’s NFSC presenters\nrequested that Guo’s remaining followers provide statements to Guo’s court appointed counsel. In\naddition, the presenter indicated that the 126 victims who previously provided statements “will all\nhave to bear the consequences.” (Dkt. 832, Stmt. 206-B (translated)).\nThat appears to be a reference to the 126 victim statements filed with the Court on November 22,\n2024. (Dkt. 477).\n3. Guo’s Post-Arrest Obstruction\nEven after his arrest Guo has engaged in obstructive conduct. Guo’s criminal Enterprise\ncontinued to operate following his arrest and Guo continued to direct it as it relocated to the UAE,\noutside the reach of U.S. law enforcement. (PSR ¶¶ 103-105). Following his arrest, Guo’s\n27\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 16 of 64\nOPENGOVNY Health Authority Business Education Other\nNew York State Health Facilities\nOverview\nThis dataset includes about 6,000 health facilities registered with the Health Facilities Information System of New York\nState Department of Health. The Health Facilities Information System (HFIS) contains Article 28, Article 36, Article 40, and\nArticle 7 health care facilities and programs. Each facility is registered with facility ID, facility name, business address,\noperator name, operator address, telephone, website, open date, etc.\nSearch Facilities\nDataset Information\nSubject Health\nJurisdiction State of New York\nData Provider New York State Department of Health, Center for Health Care Facility Planning, Licensure, and Finance\nSource data.ny.gov\nDataset Details\nThe Center for Health Care Facility Planning, Licensure, and Finance of New York State Department of Health maintains the Health Facilities\nInformation System (HFIS), which contains the operating certificate information of the following licensed health care facilities: (1) Article 28: Hospitals,\nNursing Homes, Diagnostic and Treatment Centers, Midwifery Birth Centers; (2) Article 36: Certified Home Health Agencies, Licensed Home Care\nServices Agencies, Long Term Home Health Care Programs; and (3) Article 40: Hospices. The information contains the operator and the site of\nservice, including operator name, site address, and certified beds and/or services.\nThis dataset contains the locations of Article 28, Article 36, Article 40, and Article 7 health care facilities and programs from the Health Facilities\nInformation System (HFIS). Article 28 facilities are hospitals, nursing homes, diagnostic treatment centers and midwifery birth centers. Article 36\nfacilities are certified home health care agencies, licensed home care services agencies, and long term home health care programs. Article 40\nfacilities are hospices. Article 7 are licensed adult care facilities. Each facility is registered with facility ID, facility name, business address, operator\nname, operator address, telephone, website, open date, etc.\nTo give New Yorkers the access they deserve to government data and information, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo launched the Open NY initiative in\nMarch 2013 and signed Executive Order 95. It directs state agencies to identify, catalog, and publish their data on the state's open data website\nadministered by the Office of Information Technology Services (ITS). Open NY increases transparency, improves government performance\nempowers New Yorkers to participate in government, and encourages research and economic opportunities statewide.\nSearch Result\nFacility Name Address Description Open\nDate\nIngersoll Place Licensed Home Care Services Agency 3359 Consaul Road, Schenectady, New York Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nIngersoll Adult Home, Inc. 12304 Agency 06-09\nCoopers Corner, Inc. 11 Mill Road. New Rochelle, New York 10804 Adult Home 2023-\n06-09\nNew Vision Home Care Services, Lic 96-09 Springfield Blvd, Unit 204, Queens Licensed Home Care Services 2023\nVillage, New York 11429 Agency 05-25\nAnchor Health Homecare Services Inc 173 Huguenot Street, Suite 221, New Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nRochelle, New York 10801 Agency 05-24\nSunrise Home Care, Inc 15 Cooledge Drive, Brewster, New York 10509 Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nAgency 05-22\nSt. Peter's Hospital -SPARC St Peters Hospital Inc 1300 Massachusetts Avenue, Troy, New York Hospital 2023\n12180 05-15\nWestside Health Center Housing Works Health 326 West 48th Street, New York, New York Diagnostic and Treatment Center 2023-\n-\nServices III, Inc. 10036 Extension Clinic 05-12\nDaniel Squire Oral D & T Center Mobile School-Based Squire Hall-3435 Main Street- SUNY/B, 3425 School Based Diagnostic and 2023\nDental Unit Main St, Buffalo, New York 14214 Treatment Center Extension Clinic 05-04\nField of Dreams Senior Living Olean Manor, Inc 3260 N 7th Street, Cattaraugus, New York Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\n14706 Agency 04-25\nUltimate Care INC Ultimate Care, Inc 250 Fulton Avenue, Suite 511, Hempstead Licensed Home Care Services 2023-\nNew York 11550 Agency 04-06\nUltimate Care Inc Ultimate Care, Inc. 280 Route 211 East, Suite 202, Middletown, Licensed Home Care Services 2023\nNew York 10940 Agency 04-06\nSun River Health White Plains Sun River Health 360 Mamaroneck Avenue,W hite Plains, New Diagnostic and Treatment Center 2023-\nCare, Inc. York 10605 Extension Clinic 03-29\nSun River Health Copiague Sun River Health Care, 445 Oak Street, Copiague, New York 11726 Diagnostic and Treatment Center 2023\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 17 of 64\nopengovny.com/corporation/7518505#google_vignette\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 18 of 64\nOPENGOVNY Health Authority Business Education Other\nNew York State Corporation Entity Overview\nAction Action Action LLC Location Information\nSimilar Entities\n87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P, Elmhurst, NY 11373\nDataset Information\nOverview\nACTION ACTION ACTION LLC (DOS #7518505) is a Domestic Limited Liability Company in Elmhurst registered with the\nNew York State Department of State (NYSDOS). The business entity was initially filed on January 27, 2025. The\nregistered business location is at 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P, Elmhurst, NY 11373. The DOS process contact is Action Action\nAction LLC.\nBusiness Entity Information\nDOS ID 7518505\nCurrent Entity Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nCounty Queens\nJurisdiction New York\nEntity Type DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY\nInitial DOS Filing Date 2025-01-27\nDOS Process Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nDOS Process Address 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\nLastest Filing Information\nFiling Number 250127002666\nFiling Type ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION\nMod Cert Code 01DAA\nApproved Date 2025-01-27\nFiling Date 2025-01-27\nEntity Type DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY\nCurrent Entity Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nEffective Date 2025-01-27\nDuration PERPETUAL\nLaw Section LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW 203 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW\n-\nCounty Queens\nJurisdiction NY\nFiler Name FORREST ZHOU\nFiler Address C/O Cmly & Associates LLC\n3636 Prince St. #307\nFlushing\nNY 11354\nDOS Process Name The LLC\nDOS Process Address 87-10 51 Ave.. Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\nEntity Name History\nFiling Date Entity Name Filing Number Type Status\n2025-01-27 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC 250127002666 Actual Active\nEntity Address History\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 19 of 64 Overview\nMod Cert Code 01DAA\nLocation Information\nApproved Date 2025-01-27\nSimilar Entities\nFiling Date 2025-01-27\nDataset Information\nEntity Type DOMESTIC LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY\nCurrent Entity Name ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC\nEffective Date 2025-01-27\nDuration PERPETUAL\nLaw Section LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW 203 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LAW\n-\nCounty Queens\nJurisdiction NY\nFiler Name FORREST ZHOU\nFiler Address C/O Cmly & Associates LLC\n3636 Prince St. #307\nFlushing\nNY 11354\nDOS Process Name The LLC\nDOS Process Address 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P\nElmhurst\nNY 11373\nEntity Name History\nFiling Date Entity Name Filing Number Type Status\n2025-01-27 ACTION ACTION ACTION LLC 250127002666 Actual Active\nEntity Address History\nFiling Date Address Type Address Name Address Filing Number\n2025-01-27 Service of Process The LLC 87-10 51 Ave., Rm 2P. Elmhurst. NY 11373 250127002666\nLocation Information\nStreet Address 87-10 51 Ave.. Rm 2P 在 Google 地图中打开 纽约 to新 wn城 Hi高 gh中\nSchool\n50th Ave\nStC ai tt ey NEl Ymhurst Dongan\ntJames 51\nZip Code 11373\nmet\nCorona\nAve.\n8 57 t 1t hh\ns\nS tt\nA\n50th Ave Apt 2p 51st Ave\n51st\nAve\noadw\n52nd\nAv 5e\n3rd Av So 键o 盘g 快le\n捷\n说A ve\n地图数据 ©2026 Google GS(2011)6020 条款\nCorporations in the same zip code\nCorporation Name Address Registered Agent Name Initial DOS Filing Date\nYongwu Inc. 88-23 54 Avenue, Elmnurst, NY 11373 2026-05-26\nArcentales LLC 4319 Judge St Fl 1, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-19\nObsidian Gaa Inc. 89-20 55th Ave., 5q, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-29\nTopg Remodeling Corр. 91-01 lamont avenue, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-19\nMyagdiko Family Grocery Store Inc 9311 50th Ave, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-18\nBormate Thera Kines Rehab LLC 9048 53rd Ave, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-22\nGentle Guardian Homecare Inc. 5135 Simonson St, 1st Flr, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-26\nEntree Foods Inc. 5109 Gorsline St, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-22\nOmni Cable LLC 83-69 Vietor Ave #3, Elmhurst, NY 11373 2026-05-27\nAlmas It Service Corp 94-27 Corona Ave, Queens, NY 11373 Luis Santiago Sanchez Batista 2026-05-29\nFind all corporations in the same zip code\nSimilar Entities\nCorporations with similar names\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 20 of 64 Overview\nCorporations with similar names\nLocation Information\nCorporation Name Address Registered Agent Name Initial DOS Filing Date\nLove In Action Doula Services LLC 26 BellA ir Lane, Wappingers Falls1, NY 12590 2024-03-04 Similar Entities\nAction Financial Planning, Inc. 191 north avenue, Mount Clemens, MI 48043 2024-04-22 Dataset Information\nA Call for Action To Vote, Inc 3005 village park drive, Spring Hope, NC 27882 2022-12-12\nImprove Information\nDo you have more infomration about Action Action Action LLC? Please fill in the following form.\nName\nAddress\nTelephone\nEmail\nWebsite\nContent\nSubmit Form\nDataset Information\nThis dataset includes about three million business entities and corporations registered with New York State Department of State (NYSDOS). The\nDepartment of State keeps a record of every filing for every incorporated business in the state of New York. Each business entity is registered with DOS\nID, business legal name, type, filing date, registered agent name, office address, etc.\nSubject Business and Economy\nJurisdiction State of New York\nData Provider New York State Department of State (NYSDOS)\nSource data.ny.gov\nSearch Corporations\nDataset Details\nThe New York State Department of State, one of the oldest and most diverse agencies in state government, works to make New York a more\nwelcoming, equitable, and prosperous place for all who call it home. Established in 1778, and known as the Keeper of Records for more than two\ncenturies, the Department improves the quality of life for all New Yorkers by providing a myriad of essential services and programs to local\ngovernments, businesses, community organizations and citizens. Business corporations, not-for-profit corporations, limited liability companies and\nlimited partnerships must file a formation document with the New York State Department of State in order to do business within the State of New York\nEach corporate, limited liability company or limited partnership name must be unique.\nOut-of-state corporations which choose to do business in New York State must file with the Department of State an application for authority. If the\nentity name is not distinguishable from the name of all other entities on file with the Department of State, the corporation must use a fictitious name\nwhich, likewise, must be distinguishable from the name of allo ther entities on file with the Department of State. With some exceptions, each business\ncorporation must submit a statement every two years verifying their service of process address and identifying the name and address of the chief\nexecutive officer of the corporation and the address of the principal executive office of the corporation. Limited liability companies must submit a\nstatement every two years that verifies the service of process address.\nThis Corporation and Business Entity Database includes business and not for profit corporations, limited partnerships, limited liability companies,\nlimited liability partnerships, and other miscellaneous businesses. The database also includes assumed name filings for corporations, limited liability\ncompanies and limited partnerships. Each business entity is registered with DOS ID, business legal name, entity type, filing date, registered agent\nname and address, officer name and address, office address, etc.\nTo give New Yorkers the access they deserve to government data and information, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo launched the Open NY initiative in\nMarch 2013 and signed Executive Order 95. It directs state agencies to identify, catalog, and publish their data on the state's open data website\nadministered by the Office of Information Technology Services (ITS). Open NY increases transparency, improves government performance,\nempowers New Yorkers to participate in government, and encourages research and economic opportunities statewide.\nOPENGOVNY Contact\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 21 of 64\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 22 of 64\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\nCase No. [CASE NUMBER]\n-v-\n[DEFENDANT NAME],\nEXHIBIT AA\nDefendant.\nEXHIBIT AA: PROFFER OF NEWLY DISCOVERED EVIDENCE AND\nCOMPLETE TRANSCRIPTS (Extra-Judicial Admissions by Witness Yongbing\nZhang on the GETTR Platform and Public Broadcasts)\nDECLARATIONOFGOOD-FAITHTRANSLATIONANDBURDENSHIFTINGDue\n1\nto extreme exigent circumstances and the immediate proximity of the sentenc-\n2\ninghearing,I,appearingProSeasaprotectedthird-partyrights-holder,lackthe\n3\ntime and financial resources to obtain a formally certified translation of these\n4\nnewly discovered, highly exculpatory public posts and broadcasts. The English\n5\ntexts provided below constitute a complete, unredacted, good-faith, and accu-\n6\nratereferencetranslationoftheoriginalChinesematerialsauthoredandspoken\n7\nby Yongbing Zhang (a.k.a. “Changong Qixia” / “Fatong”).\n8\nShouldtheGovernment—whichpossessesinfiniteinvestigativeresources,\n9\nemploysin-houselinguists,andactivelymonitorsthesespecificcooperators’so-\n10\ncial media accounts—dispute the accuracy of these complete translations, the\n11\n1\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 23 of 64\nburden shifts entirely to the Government to produce an official, certified trans-\n12\nlation for the Court. The Government must not be permitted to exploit a Pro Se\n13\nrights-holder’s lack of immediate access to certified translators as a procedural\n14\nloophole to suppress incontrovertible evidence of its own Napue violations and\n15\nFraud on the Court.\n16\n——————————————————————————–\n17\nDOCUMENT 1: FULL TRANSLATION OF GETTR POST BY YONGBING ZHANG\n18\n(DATED JANUARY 18, 2026) (Reference: Original Screenshots 1-4)\n19\n”AtnoononSaturday,January17,EST,Qixia[YongbingZhang]visited[the\n20\nDefendant] in the capacity of a lawyer. The sky in New York was covered with\n21\ndark clouds that day, and snowflakes and drizzle fell from the sky from time to\n22\ntime. Due to the arrival of the Maduro couple, the layout of the outer perime-\n23\nter of MDC has changed a lot compared to when I visited in September 2025.\n24\nIron protective fences have been set up at all surrounding intersections. But\n25\none thing has not only not changed, but has actually increased, and that is the\n26\nartdisplaysupporting[theDefendant]constructedbyfellowfightersonthepro-\n27\ntectivenetaroundMDC. Since[theDefendant] enteredMDCon March15, 2023,\n28\nsuch displays have never been interrupted. In the past, it was on the side of the\n29\nWestBuildingfacingtheStatueofLiberty,because[theDefendant]waslivingin\n30\ntheWestBuildingatthattime. Uptonow,as[theDefendant]hasbeenmovedto\n31\nthe East Building, the display on the west side is still visible, and right at the en-\n32\ntrancefacingtheEastBuilding,fellowfightershaverecentlyconstructedavery\n33\neye-catching banner, nearly ten meters long and about three meters high. It is\n34\nmade of bunches of colorful small flowers tied to the mesh wall, featuring a G\n35\nlogo and a line of text: ’Winter Month Thirteen LOVE GUO’. When I visited last\n36\nSeptember, this banner was not there.\n37\n2\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 24 of 64\nAfter entering the building, I quickly completed the registration proce-\n38\ndures, passed through security, and entered the visiting area. I chose the same\n39\nroom where I had a meeting with [the Defendant] last time. It is about 1.5 me-\n40\nters wide and over 2 meters long. The room contains a small table and four\n41\nchairs. There is a computer and a monitor on the table. This is one of only two\n42\nmeeting rooms equipped with computers, and the computer in the other room\n43\nisobviouslynotpluggedin. Iquicklysetupmydocumentsandotheritems,then\n44\nboughtsomesnacksanddrinksfromthevendingmachine. Fullyprepared,Isat\n45\ndown in the room, waiting for [the Defendant].\n46\nBefore long, [the Defendant] appeared at the duty desk, chatting with the\n47\nfemale guard who brought him over while looking towards the meeting room.\n48\nUpon seeing me, he laughed. I also stepped out of the room to greet [the Defen-\n49\ndant]. [The Defendant] held a thick stack of documents and a document bag in\n50\nhis left arm and opened his right arm. I also opened my arms, and [the Defen-\n51\ndant] and I hugged tightly. Time seemed to stop at that moment. I put down my\n52\narms, looked closely at [the Defendant], and then hugged him again. I silently\n53\nrecited in my heart that this hug was given on behalf of the fellow fighters. We\n54\nwalkedintotheroom,and[theDefendant]saidwithasmilewhileputtingdown\n55\nthe documents: ’This room has become exclusively mine.’ After we sat down,\n56\n[the Defendant] said again: ’Haha, it really feels like a dream.’\n57\nWe read the documents while discussing. [The Defendant] always talks\n58\nendlesslyabouthisviewsonthecase,currentaffairs,history,theWhistleblower\n59\nMovement, and so on. [The Defendant] has been in MDC for nearly three years.\n60\nAlthoughlivinginsuchanincrediblyharshenvironment,theglobalCCP-takedown\n61\nmovementcreatedby[theDefendant]hasneverpausedforamoment. MDChas\n62\nmerelybecomeanotherlocationfor[theDefendant]tocontinuetakingdownthe\n63\nCCP.[TheDefendant]toldmethateverydayinMDC,hefirmlyrememberstodo\n64\n3\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 25 of 64\nthreethings: First: prayingtothemillionsofBuddhasandgodsfortheWhistle-\n65\nblower Movement and fellow fighters cannot be reduced one bit; Second: his\n66\nown personal safety and health are not his personal matters but the matters of\n67\nthe fellow fighters; Third: grasp every minute and second to study and work,\n68\nwasting no time.\n69\nWhen discussing Document No. 789 recently submitted to the court by\n70\n[theDefendant]’scriminaldefenselawyer,[theDefendant]wasveryexcited. He\n71\nsaid: ’It was exactly in this room, several of their lawyers sat on the side where\n72\nyou are sitting now, and I was still sitting in the chair you are in now. We dis-\n73\ncussed and scrutinized it word by word. This is a big deal! Qixia.’ He said any-\n74\nthing involving the core interests of fellow fighters is a big deal. I recalled that\n75\nincourtonMarch15,theprosecutormobilizedalargeforceanddeclaredtothe\n76\njudge: ’giventhemultitudeofthousandsofvictimsinthiscase’(March15,2023,\n77\nCourtTranscript,Page3,Lines7-8). However,intherulingonthedisposalofthe\n78\nassetsinvolvedinthecasereturnedtothecourtlastweek,theexactsameprose-\n79\ncutorswroteinblackandwhiteinDocumentNo. 785thatasofJanuary9,2026,\n80\n(only) 134 people submitted applications through the court. The applications\n81\nmailedtothegovernment,whichistheprosecutor,were(only)238. (’...approxi-\n82\nmately134purported§853(n)claimswerefiledonthedocket.’ ’Inaddition,the\n83\nGovernmenthasreceivedapproximately238purported§853claimsbymail,...’\n84\nSee footnote 3 on the last line of Page 3 of Document No. 785). Shouldn’t the\n85\nprosecutor explain such a massive discrepancy?\n86\nRegarding those who relied on the Whistleblower Movement to amass\n87\nill-gotten wealth, gained unprecedented reputation, and then left the Whistle-\n88\nblower Movement or were swept out by it, [the Defendant] stared at me tightly\n89\nand said sternly: ’If these people had not originally participated in the Whistle-\n90\nblower Movement, how could they possibly have gained this wealth and repu-\n91\n4\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 26 of 64\ntation? NowthattheyhavelefttheWhistleblowerMovement,theyarenothing!\n92\nTheir illegal acts will certainly be legally pursued.’\n93\nEvery time I meet or even talk on the phone with [the Defendant], I feel\n94\nas if I am in a huge magnetic field with endless energy pushing me forward. I\n95\nalsofeelliketimeisonahigh-speedtrain,andthemomentofpartingarrivesin\n96\na flash. [The Defendant] stood up and said: ’Let’s go, because there are families\n97\ngatheringoutsidetheroom,Icannotwalkyoutothedutydesk,wecanonlysay\n98\ngoodbyehere. Waitforthemtotakemeback.’ Ipackedmybelongings. Stoodup.\n99\nHugged[the Defendant]tightly again. Once again, I feltthe strength broughtby\n100\n[the Defendant]’s iron-wall-like body. [The Defendant] said to me again: ’After\n101\nyou go out, if there are fellow fighters still outside, please make sure to pass on\n102\nmygreetingsandexpressmygratitudetothem. Tellthem,don’tstayoutside,it’s\n103\ntoo cold. Speaking of this makes my heart ache.’\n104\nIpushedthedooropen,walkedafewsteps,andlookedbackat[theDefen-\n105\ndant]. He stood there smiling and waving at me. I turned around and took big\n106\nstrides towards the duty officer who had already opened the first door for me.\n107\nAfterpassingthroughthetwodoors,Ilookedbackagain,hoping[theDefendant]\n108\ncould walk into my line of sight on his way back.\n109\nSpecial thanks to Secretary Qingteng and multiple fellow fighters in New\n110\nYork for the logistical support and preparation provided.”\n111\n——————————————————————————–\n112\nDOCUMENT 2: FULL TRANSLATION OF GETTR POST BY YONGBING ZHANG\n113\n(DATED JANUARY 28, 2026) (Reference: Original Screenshots 5-6)\n114\n”AtnoononJanuary26,EST,QixiacametoMDCtovisit[theDefendant]. A\n115\nheavy snow had just fallen in New York the day before. The temperature plum-\n116\nmetedtomorethantendegreesbelowzeroCelsius. Thevisitingareaonthefirst\n117\n5\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 27 of 64\nfloor of the East Building of MDC was also permeated with cold air. As soon as\n118\nhe saw [the Defendant], he excitedly expressed that I, as a fellow fighter of the\n119\nWhistleblower Movement, brought him warmth and strength. During this pe-\n120\nriod of historical major events, [the Defendant] misses his sisters and brothers\n121\neven more. We immediately talked about Mr. Zhang Youxia. [The Defendant]\n122\nsaid General Zhang is already the greatest hero among the Chinese sons and\n123\ndaughters. He is saving humanity and is a true great hero taking down the CCP.\n124\nInthefuture,therewillbecountlessZhangYouxiasandLiuZhenlisstandingup.\n125\nMore and more people will deeply believe: ’Taking down the CCP is a necessity\n126\nfor justice,’ the cry issued by Brother Haidong when reading the declaration of\n127\nthe New Federal State of China on June 4, 2020.\n128\n[TheDefendant]gavehighpraisetotheactionsofSecretaryQingtengand\n129\ntheExecutiveCommittee,aswellasthebrothersandsistersofvariousfarmsthis\n130\nweek. Let everyone continue to act. [The Defendant] hopes that fellow fighters\n131\nwill widely spread the truth to awaken more people domestically and abroad\n132\nto recognize this historical event. First, five questions must be raised. 1. Did\n133\nZhang Youxia do this for money? 2. Did he do this so he could run to the United\n134\nStates? 3. WereZhangYouxiaandLiuZhenlitakendownbecauseofcorruption\n135\nor male-female relations? 4. What is the core purpose of Zhang Youxia and Liu\n136\nZhenli doing this? 5. What is the possible reaction of the United States to Zhang\n137\nYouxia’s actions?\n138\nSecondly, fellow fighters should pay attention to the four major impacts\n139\nproducedbythisincident. First: AwakeningtheUnitedStatesandmoreChinese\n140\npeople; Second: The leaked materials by Zhang Youxia cannot possibly be just\n141\nnuclear weapons data. The impact brought by this; Third: The joint defection\n142\nof the two highest-ranking professional military generals of China predicts that\n143\nmore generals will stand up; Fourth: The shocking effect on Russia, the BRICS\n144\n6\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 28 of 64\ncountries, and other allies of the CCP.\n145\nUnknowingly, three hours passed. Upon leaving, [the Defendant] and I\n146\nhugged tightly. I could feel the strength brought to [the Defendant] by the inci-\n147\ndent of Zhang Youxia and Liu Zhenli taking down the CCP together. Despite the\n148\nsevere cold, I could feel the blazing fire burning on [the Defendant] because of\n149\nthis!\n150\nPlease, fellow fighters, watch, spread and promote the live broadcast of\n151\ntheallianceonJanuary26. Init,Iandfourotherfellowfighters(BrotherHaidong,\n152\nMr. Sanpiao,SecretaryQingteng,Ava)detailed,exploredandcommentedonthe\n153\nabove five questions and four impacts.\n154\nFellowfighters,staystrong! Loveyouall! ShenxianYangguCountyDagao\n155\nCounty!!!”\n156\n——————————————————————————–\n157\nEXHIBIT:FULLTRANSCRIPTOFAPRIL10,2026PUBLICBROADCASTSpeak-\n158\ners: An Hong (Host), Yongbing Zhang (a.k.a. “Changong Qixia” / “Fatong”)\n159\nSubject: Extra-Judicial Admission Regarding the $38 Million HCHKBVI Cor-\n160\nporate Dispute\n161\n[BEGIN COMPLETE TRANSLATION]\n162\nAnHong(Host): ”Helloeveryone,thisisApril11,2026,AustralianEasternTime,\n163\nandtheafternoonofApril10,2026,USEasternTime. Today,firstofall,Iwantto\n164\nsay to everyone that last week, due to some reasons, we postponed for a week.\n165\nAt that time, we also thought that exactly this week the documents from the\n166\ngovernment’s side would come out, so I agreed with fellow fighter Changong\n167\nQixia[YongbingZhang]todothisepisodetoday. Ialsowanttoaskfellowfighter\n168\nQixia today. First, because fellow fighter Changong Qixia is on a business trip\n169\ntoday and has official duties, it is inconvenient for him to show his face as he\n170\n7\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 29 of 64\nis on the road. Therefore, we are interviewing fellow fighter Qixia via a phone\n171\nconnection. Next, let’s invite fellow fighter Changong Qixia to say hello to us.\n172\nThank you.”\n173\nYongbing Zhang (Changong Qixia): ”Thank you, fellow fighter. Thank you,\n174\nfellow fighter An Hong, and thank you to all the fellow fighters globally. Hello\n175\neveryone, regardless of whether it is morning or evening for you, or perhaps\n176\nnoon. Hello everyone, today is the weekend here in the US Eastern Time zone;\n177\nmaybe some fellow fighters are already enjoying their weekend. Regardless, I\n178\nwish everyone a very good weekend. Today, the topic I want to discuss is some-\n179\nthing everyone is definitely very interested in. So, I will use this audio connec-\n180\ntion to talk with fellow fighter An Hong about two important court documents.\n181\nIn doing this program with fellow fighter An Hong today, the content I discuss\n182\nin this program represents only my own personal views. It does not represent\n183\nany party, it does not represent [the Defendant], nor does it represent [the De-\n184\nfendant]’slawyers. Itismerelymyownpersonalopinion,anddoesnotserveas\n185\nany legal reference or advice. Alright.”\n186\nYongbing Zhang: ”An Hong, let me first say, today’s topic is called Q&A, right?\n187\nItjustsohappensthattodayIcanalsotakethisopportunitytoexplaintoevery-\n188\none... to explain to everyone how this whole thing unfolded.”\n189\nAn Hong: ”Regarding the 38 million, 38 million.”\n190\nYongbing Zhang: ”Yes, this 38 million. Yes, regarding this... when Li Ya [Mu-\n191\nlan] testified, she said that Changong Qixia forced her to sign a so-called fake\n192\naffidavit. And then, she claimed that because he forced her, she ultimately de-\n193\nveloped suicidal thoughts. OK.”\n194\nAn Hong: ”Mm.”\n195\nYongbing Zhang: ”Let me disclose a few things to everyone... because I am the\n196\nperson who personally experienced this, so I need to tell everyone. First, when\n197\n8\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 30 of 64\nI sent the then-fellow fighter Mulan, the document she claimed I forced her to\n198\nsign... itwasn’tjustadocument. IntheIronBloodGroup,whereallthemembers\n199\nof the Iron Blood Group were present, I sent her a message, similar to a text\n200\nmessage but maybe a bit longer. My point was, ’Hey, the 38 million belonging to\n201\nthefellowfightersiscurrentlybeingtargetedbyL[TrusteeLucA.Despins]who\n202\nis attempting to take it away.’ I told her, from a legal perspective, you can do\n203\nthis because the company is currently in legal proceedings. For this company,\n204\nknown as HCHKBVI, a BVI company, besides [Yvette Wang] being a director, the\n205\nother director was exactly Mulan, OK, which is Li Ya. She was a director at the\n206\ntime, OK.”\n207\n”Legallyspeaking,thatmeansinJulyandAugust2023. Mulanwasadirec-\n208\ntorofHCHKBVI.Atthattime,[YvetteWang]wasalreadyintheMDC.Mulanwas\n209\ninAustralia,OK.Naturally,therearemanydocumentsconcerningtheHCHKBVI\n210\ncompany that must be handled by a director. For instance, if you need to hire\n211\na lawyer to respond to a lawsuit. Only a director can do that, so I told her, ’You\n212\nare a director. From a legal perspective, these matters are within the scope of a\n213\ndirector’s duties.’”\n214\n”There is another very important point. Today I want to give everyone a\n215\nbreakingrevelation,orrather,ifeveryonecarefullychecksthecourtdocuments,\n216\nactually, back at that time, actually in August 2023, she had already cooperated\n217\nwiththeprosecution... alreadycooperatedwithLuke[theTrustee]. Idon’tknow\n218\nif she was cooperating with the prosecution then.”\n219\nAn Hong: ”Mm.”\n220\nYongbingZhang: ”Ifeveryonecheckswhatshesaidduringthehearingsbefore\n221\nthe jury, maybe she was already cooperating with the police at that time. That\n222\nis to say, when she was doing these things, when we asked her to protect the\n223\ninterests of the fellow fighters, the interests of the 38 [million], she was actually\n224\n9\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 31 of 64\nalready secretly shaking hands with at least L [the Trustee]. She was communi-\n225\ncating with him. Why? Why? Because we have L’s... we have documents show-\n226\ning,OK,thereisevidenceshowing,thatatthattimeshewasalreadycooperating\n227\nwith Luke. And when did I send the document to Mulan? It was September 2,\n228\n2023. Which means, at that time, she was already L’s person. OK.”\n229\n”And now I want to give everyone a detail. What is it? When I sent the\n230\ndocument to Mulan, when I sent her the email, I sent her two files. One file was\n231\na PDF version of the affidavit.”\n232\nAn Hong: ”Mm.”\n233\nYongbingZhang: ”OnefilewasaWordversionoftheaffidavit,OK.Myintention\n234\nwas to tell her, ’Here are two versions. If you disagree, you can go ahead and\n235\nmodify it, because I gave you the Word version.’”\n236\nAn Hong: ”Right.”\n237\nYongbing Zhang: ”Right? So there was absolutely no such thing as... forcing\n238\nher. How am I forcing her? Everyone, use your normal human brain to think\n239\nabout it. I am in the US, right? There is a 16-hour time difference between us,\n240\nhow could I force her? Right? That is... right. So from this point, I don’t know\n241\nhow all her testimonies were prepared, OK. So today, I am very, very glad to\n242\nhave this opportunity to tell everyone. Ah, so my name is clearly written in\n243\nblackandwhiteinDocument833once,andthentwicemore... Ah,so,thisisthe\n244\nsecond point I am sharing with you all, or answering your second question. I\n245\ndon’tknowifIanswereditcompletely,Igetabitexcitedwhenspeaking,maybe\n246\nI went a little off-topic.”\n247\n[END COMPLETE TRANSLATION]\n248\nNote on Media Exhibit Submission: Due to the Court’s 10MB electronic fil-\n249\ning size limit for email submissions, an audio extraction of the 7-minute broad-\n250\n10\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 32 of 64\ncast (Exhibit: Extra-Judicial Admission by Yongbing Zhang) is attached hereto\n251\nin .mp3 format. The original, full-length video file is preserved and immedi-\n252\nately available for submission via physical media (USB drive) upon the Court’s\n253\nrequest.\n254\n11\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 33 of 64\n\nbragey5.dreamhosters.com/提交宣誓书/ Case: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 34 of 64\nHIMALAYA\nRESTORATION News Update Contact Us FILE AN AFFIDAVIT 提交宣誓书\n我们不再接受新客户。法院要求每位现有客户提交一份宣誓书。请填写右\n侧表格,立即提交您的宣誓书。\n宣誓书(支持附属或赦免请愿)\nNEW\naccessed using HID#*\nSign HID #*\n通过在上面两次输入我的唯一 HID# 作为我的签名,我在此根据伪证罪的处罚声明,我已仔细审查以下信息,并且根据美国法\n律,在我所知范围内,它是真实和正确的:\n1. 索赔人的身份和资格\nA. 我的身份信息由喜马拉雅交易所(HEX) 安全持有,并可使用上面的 HID# 访问。 B. 我根据 21 U.S.C. § 853 (n) 和联邦刑事\n诉讼规则第32.2 (C) 条提交本宣誓书,主张我在美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok 别名“Miles Guo\"案(案号 23-cr-118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.))中\n没收财产的合法权益。C. 财产的合法所有者,该财产作为稳定币储备由喜马拉雅交易所持有。我对任何非法活动\n无所知,也没有参与其中,我作为无辜投资者以善意获取了我的资产。 D. 我授权 Former FedsG roup.Com LLC 继续代表我行\n事,积极追究此索赔,并寻求恢复我的HDO 余额的等值金额,以及与我的HCN 资产贬值相关的任何相关损失,如下所述。根据\n银行记录和 的账 2021年4月开放后以及美国政府于2022年9月扣押前进行了这些购\n2. 没收财产的描述\nA. 没收财产的详细信息存储在HEX 的账户记录中, 喜马拉雅美元 稳定币余额和相关的喜马拉雅币(HCN) 余\n额。HDO 稳定币储备作为政府在上述案件中没收行动的一部分被扣押或冻结,金额达数百万美元,来自喜马拉雅交易所的银行账\n户。B. 我的HDO 余额代表一种稳定的币投资,旨在作为安全的、与美元挂钩的资产,而我的HCN 持有与平台的交易生态系统\n相关联。该扣押导致这些资产严重贬值并无法访问。C. 政府扣押 HEX 平台和网站使我无法访问我的账户信息,但 HEX 已认证我\n为客户,并提供了 HDO、HCN、存款和赎回的账户价值,我授权我的律师提供这些信息\n索赔依据\nA. 我的索赔基于以下财产的合法权益:我是该财产的合法所有者,即从扣押的稳定币储备中相当于我的 HDO 余额的美元金\n额,我的权利先于政府的没收程序。,我的权益优于任何政府索赔,因为我在相关犯罪发生前或以善意且不知任何可没收行为的\n情况下获取了该财产。该财产是合法获取的,如 HEX 记录中详尽描述,包括交易历史、存款和账户报表,显示我未参与任何所\n谓的欺诈计划。 所有建立我所有权权益的文件和账户历史均存储在HEX 的记录中,我授权在安全条件下发布。B.作为21\nU 它USS 是.C C\n一\n. 个9S 88 合55 33 法(( n 的0 )) 加(( 66 密)) 下 货下的 币的干 交无\n易\n辜所 所所有 ,有者 提者, 供,我 我 H对 对 D该 O该 财 财 (产 产 稳与 与 定非 币)和HCN(一 交无 易所 代知 币, )也 以沒 实有 现合 无理 国的 界理 金出 融相 自信 由这 ,一 如点 公。 开我\n宣\n传页\n所\n述ME 。X C, .相相 与位\nHDO 资产相关的具体损失:政府的扣押导致交易所停止赎回,因为它不再拥有储备资金。在没收前,客户能够提出赎回请求并将\nHH CD NO 兑 资换 产为 相美 关元 的。 具我 体寻 损求 失从 :喜 政马 府拉 的雅 扣押交 以易 及所 随的 后扣 押 H美 C元 N储 (备 喜资 马金 拉中 雅恢 币)复 的我 贬的\n值\nH 造D 成O 了余 直额 接的 的等 财值 务金 损额 害( 。作 在为 没稳 收定 前资 ,产 H) C。 NND .\n作作\n与\n为为\nHEX 生态系统的一部分具有价值,但平台的交易停止和资产冻结导致价值损失。 我寻求政府对我的 HCN 余额损失的补偿损害赔\n偿,按喜马拉雅交易所暂停交易时的市场价格计算。\n遵守没收程序\nA. 我根据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) (2) 要求的法定截止日期提交此索赔。 B. 我请求法院根据21 U.S.C. § 853(n) (4)-(5) 和 Fed. R.\n果果Cr 法法im 院院. P 拒拒. 绝绝32 此此.2 辅辅 (C 助 助) 的 请 请规 质 愿定 , ,安 我 我排 提 提辅 交 交助 以 以听 下 下证 陈 陈会 述 述, 以 以以 支 支审 持 持理 提 提我 交 交的 给 给索 司 司赔 法 法, 部 部呈 的 的交 减 减我 免 免的 请 请无 愿 愿辜 , ,所 根 根有 据 据权 2 证 28 8据 CC .., FF .并 . RR .挑 P P战 aa rr没 tt 9收\n9\n对 ((我 行行 政的 政 、资 、 民产 民 事的 事 和适 和 刑用 刑 事性 事 没没。 收收C 的的. 减减 如\n免或缓解规定)。 我是一名无辜所有者,对没收财产具有合法的财务权益,在不知欺诈的情况下获取。我请求司法部行使其酌情\n权,批准没收的减免或缓解,注意到没收程序最初并非设计用于处理像 HEX 这样的海外加密交易所,导致对无 用户造成不成比\n例的损害。我请求返回 HEX 持有的所有资金,包括我的 HDO 余额的等值金额,而不使用索赔管理员以节省成本和提高效率。\n我未被喜马拉雅交易所欺诈。唯一造成的损失是由于政府扣押和行动,导致交易所停止交易。\n5. 请求的救济\nA. 我恭敬地请求法院在此辅助请愿下:承认我作为无辜第三方的有效且优越的财产权益。,将我的索赔财产排除在政府的没收\n令之外,包括释放相当于我的 HDO 余额的美元。·授予法院认为公正和适当的任何其他救济,例如证据听证会或对 HEX 记录的\n发现,以验证我的索赔。 B. 如果法院不批准此辅助请愿,请接受此作为美国司法部减免程序下的返回减免请愿。我请求不使用\n索赔管理员以节省成本。我授予根据司法部和 HEX 同意的条款访问权限,并采用最严格的安全程序来保护我的信息,鉴于交易\n所的海外性质以及潜在的隐私和其他严重风险。我寻求完全减免,包括我的\n6. 授权\nA. 我授权 HEX 向法院、政府或指定的第三方提供我的账户信息,以供审查,但须遵守保护条件,以确保我的身份不公开,从而\n保 C.护 我我 授的 权安 法全 院。 、 政B. 府我 或授 指权 定 Fo 的r 第me 三rF 方ed返s 回Gr 资ou 金p. ,C 直om 接 L或LC通 代 过表 H我 EX的 协法 调律 的权 第益 三, 方继 返续 回追 。究 我索 理赔 解, 最并 终在 程所有 序相 将关 由程 法序 院中 批代 准表 ,我 我行 请事 求。 它\n考虑资产的加密性质(例如,按扣押价值转换为法定等值以减轻损失)。\n我根据伪证罪的处罚声明,前述信息在我的知识和信念范围内是真实、正确和完整的。 HID#并选择“提\n交”,我确认我的身份,并授权通过我的 HEX 账户记录验证此声明。\nSubmit\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 35 of 64\n2026/3/26 Himalaya Farm Alliance Committee Notice\nNotice Regarding the Urgent Submission of the Himalaya\n🚨\nExchange Affidavit\n\"Please, the 6,512 investors who participated in the\nHimalaya Exchange class action in 2023 and 2024, submit\n🚨\nthe affidavit via the following link as soon as possible.\"\nThose who have forgotten whether they have already\nsubmitted it can submit it again, which will not affect the\nvalidity of previous submissions.\nAffidavit Link: http\n宣誓书/\nPlease forward this to all farms and ask investors to inform\n🚨\neach other.\n\"Himalaya Farm Alliance Executive Committee, March 25,\n🚨\n2026\"\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 36 of 64\nWe no longer accept new clients. The court requires\nevery existing client to submit an affidavit. Please fill\nout the form on the right and submit your affidavit\nimmediately.\nNEW Affidavit (In Support of Ancillary or Remission Petition)\n**accessed using HID# ***\n**Sign HID # ***\nBy entering my unique HID# twice above as my signature,\nI declare under penalty of perjury that I have carefully\nreviewed the following information, and to the best of my\nknowledge and belief under U.S. law, it is true and correct:\n1. Identity and Qualification of Claimant\nA. My identity information is securely held by the\nHimalaya Exchange (HEX) and can be accessed using the\nHID# above.\nB. I am submitting this affidavit pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §\n853(n) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(c),\nasserting my lawful interest in the forfeited property in\nUnited States v. Ho Wan Kwok a/k/a \"Miles Guo\" (Case\nNo. 23-cr-118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y.)).\nC. I am the lawful owner of the property, which is held as\nstablecoin reserves by the Himalaya Exchange. I have no\nknowledge of, nor did I participate in, any illegal activities,\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 37 of 64\nand I acquired my assets in good faith as an innocent\ninvestor.\nD. I authorize FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC to\ncontinue to act on my behalf, actively pursue this claim,\nand seek the recovery of the equivalent amount of my\nHDO balance, as well as any relevant losses related to the\ndepreciation of my HCN assets, as described below.\nAccording to bank records and HEX accounts, these\npurchases were made after it opened in April 2021 and\nbefore the U.S. government's seizure in September 2022.\n2. Description of Forfeited Property\nA. The detailed information of the forfeited property is\nstored in HEX's account records, containing the Himalaya\nDollar (HDO) stablecoin balance and the related Himalaya\nCoin (HCN) balance. HDO stablecoin reserves were\nseized or frozen as part of the government's forfeiture\naction in the above-mentioned case, amounting to millions\nof dollars, originating from Himalaya Exchange's bank\naccounts.\nB. My HDO balance represents a stablecoin investment\nintended as a secure, U.S. dollar-pegged asset, while my\nHCN holdings are associated with the platform's trading\necosystem. The seizure caused these assets to severely\ndepreciate and become inaccessible.\nC. The government's seizure of the HEX platform and\nwebsite rendered me unable to access my account\ninformation, but HEX has authenticated me as a customer\nand provided the account value of HDO, HCN, deposits,\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 38 of 64\nand redemptions. I authorize my attorney to provide this\ninformation.\n3. Basis for Claim\nA. My claim is based on the lawful interest in the following\nproperty: I am the lawful owner of the property, namely the\nUSD amount equivalent to my HDO balance from the\nseized stablecoin reserves, and my right is superior to the\ngovernment's forfeiture proceedings. My interest is\nsuperior to any government claim because I acquired the\nproperty in good faith and without knowledge of any\nforfeitable acts prior to the occurrence of the relevant\ncrimes. The property was acquired lawfully, as detailed in\nHEX records, including transaction history, deposits, and\naccount statements, demonstrating I did not participate in\nany alleged fraud scheme. All documents establishing my\nownership interest and account history are stored in HEX\nrecords, which I authorize to be released under secure\nconditions.\nB. As an innocent owner under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6), I\nhave no knowledge of any illegal activities related to the\nproperty, nor is there reasonable cause to believe so. I\ninvested in HEX believing it to be a legitimate\ncryptocurrency exchange providing HDO (stablecoin) and\nHCN (trading token) to achieve borderless financial\nfreedom, as publicly advertised.\nC. Specific losses related to HDO assets: The\ngovernment's seizure caused the exchange to halt\nredemptions because it no longer possessed the reserve\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 39 of 64\nfunds. Prior to the forfeiture, customers were able to\nsubmit redemption requests and convert HDO to USD. I\nseek to recover the equivalent amount of my HDO balance\n(as a stable asset) from the seized USD reserve funds of\nthe Himalaya Exchange.\nD. Specific losses related to HCN assets: The\ngovernment's seizure and the subsequent depreciation of\nHCN (Himalaya Coin) caused direct financial harm. Prior\nto the forfeiture, HCN held value as part of the HEX\necosystem, but the platform's trading halt and asset freeze\nresulted in a loss of value. I seek compensatory damages\nfrom the government for the loss of my HCN balance,\ncalculated at the market price at the time the Himalaya\nExchange suspended trading.\n4. Compliance with Forfeiture Procedures\nA. I am submitting this claim by the statutory deadline\nrequired under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2).\nB. I request the court to schedule an ancillary hearing\npursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(4)-(5) and Fed. R. Crim. P.\n32.2(c) to adjudicate my claim, present evidence of my\ninnocent ownership, and challenge the applicability of the\nforfeiture to my assets.\nC. If the court denies this ancillary petition, I submit\nthe following statements in support of a petition for\nremission submitted to the Department of Justice,\npursuant to 28 C.F.R. Part 9 (regulations governing the\nremission or mitigation of administrative, civil, and\ncriminal forfeitures). I am an innocent owner with a\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 40 of 64\nlegitimate financial interest in the forfeited property,\nacquired without knowledge of the fraud. I request the\nDepartment of Justice to exercise its discretion to grant\nremission or mitigation of the forfeiture, noting that\nforfeiture procedures were not originally designed to\nhandle overseas crypto exchanges like HEX, resulting in\ndisproportionate harm to innocent users. I request the\nreturn of all funds held by HEX, including the equivalent\namount of my HDO balance, without the use of a claims\nadministrator to save costs and improve efficiency. I have\nnot been defrauded by the Himalaya Exchange. The\nonly loss caused is due to government seizure and\nactions, resulting in the exchange halting trading.\n5. Relief Requested\nA. I respectfully request the court under this ancillary\npetition to: recognize my valid and superior property\ninterest as an innocent third party; exclude my claimed\nproperty from the government's order of forfeiture,\nincluding releasing the USD equivalent of my HDO\nbalance; and grant any other relief the court deems just\nand proper, such as an evidentiary hearing or discovery of\nHEX records to verify my claim.\nB. If the court does not grant this ancillary petition,\nplease accept this as a petition for return and\nremission under the U.S. Department of Justice's\nremission procedures. I request not to use a claims\nadministrator to save costs. I grant access under terms\nagreed upon by the Department of Justice and HEX,\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 41 of 64\nemploying the strictest security procedures to protect my\ninformation, given the overseas nature of the exchange If\nthe court denies this ancillary petition, I submit the\nfollowing statements in support of a petition for remission\nsubmitted to the Department of Justice, pursuant to 28\nC.F.R. Part 9and potential privacy and other severe risks. I\nseek full remission, including my…\n6. Authorization\nA. I authorize HEX to provide my account information to\nthe court, the government, or a designated third party for\nreview, subject to protective conditions to ensure my\nidentity is not made public, thereby protecting my safety.\nB. I authorize FormerFedsGroup.Com LLC to\nrepresent my legal interests, continue to pursue the\nclaim, and act on my behalf in all related proceedings.\nC. I authorize the court, the government, or a designated\nthird party to return the funds, directly or through a third\nparty coordinated by HEX. I understand the final\nprocedure will be approved by the court, and I request it\nconsider the crypto nature of the assets (e.g., converting\nto fiat equivalent at the seized value to mitigate loss).\nI declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing\ninformation is true, correct, and complete to the best of my\nknowledge and belief. By entering my HID# and selecting\n\"Submit,\" I confirm my identity and authorize the\nverification of this statement through my HEX account\nrecords.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 42 of 64\nSubmit\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 43 of 64\n[Translator's Note: True and Correct English Translation of the Chinese Audio Exhibit 2A\n(Duration: 1m39s)]\nForest Zhou (Government Witness): This is considered an important notice.\nJiajia: Yes, exactly. Originally this should have been notified to the 1,800 creditors, but\nnow only a few people were notified. So now, the Alliance is stepping in to bridge this\ninformation gap...\nAva Chen: ...to communicate this information gap to all the fellow fighters who are\nalready creditors. Because nobody is going to stare at this every day, considering there\nare five or six thousand [documents] and over 400 adversary proceedings. So nobody is\ngoing to type on their keyboard every day checking for documents. This has a potential\ndirect impact on the interests of the creditors. Yes, because the fees will be deducted\nfrom the assets of the debtor, Mr. Wengui. So this will affect the remaining funds\ndistributed to all creditors. If you are interested, please check the Alliance's upcoming\nannouncement.\nForest Zhou: To prevent individuals with ulterior motives from taking things out of\ncontext, we have a disclaimer here... It simply states that the Alliance is here to assist\nevery fellow fighter, every creditor... to share the summarized information we obtained\nfrom consulting many lawyers... This is our disclaimer, right? The disclaimer will not be\nincluded in the screenshots.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 44 of 64\n[Translator's Note: True and Correct English Translation of the Chinese Audio Exhibit 2C\n(Duration: 4m13s)]\nAva Chen: I will briefly explain what this is. Recently, there have been some updates in our\nConnecticut bankruptcy case... Because the court documents were not served to each of\nthe approximately 1,800 creditors, and only a few creditors were notified, we want to\ninform everyone here. If you are a fellow fighter who has already registered as a\ncreditor... and you are interested in understanding this latest motion regarding the\npayment of the Trustee's fees... the Alliance here will help coordinate everyone, translate\nsome documents, and share the latest information.\nYou can immediately contact your Farm Owner or CEO... The deadline for filing an\nobjection is April 17 EST... The Alliance has tentatively scheduled an information meeting\nfor tomorrow night EST...\nForest Zhou: I actually want to add something here... The trustee... has already burned\nthrough 70 or 80 million... we are providing this assistance so everyone understands the\nprocess... If you have this intention, the Alliance will assist everyone.\nAva Chen: I want to add that after our broadcast, we will issue an Alliance\nannouncement... containing both Chinese and English versions.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 45 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT N\nExhibit N: AI-forged audio recording of a fabricated prison phone call involving a\nmicrowave incident and a Christmas meal to misrepresent prison conditions.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 46 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 47 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 48 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 49 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 50 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT O\nExhibit O: AI-forged audio recording (May 2025) featuring Qingteng promoting\nTDCCP crypto and disseminating fabricated narratives of an absurd prison lifestyle.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 51 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 52 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 53 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 54 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 55 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT P\nExhibit P: Video Broadcast (Aug 18, 2025) featuring Qingteng and Jiajia coordinating\nthe submission of petitions to assist the prosecution's asset confiscation objectives.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 56 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 57 of 64\nhello@translayte.com\n+44 (0) 208 629 1290\nBDXL Ltd. (No. 7496682). VAT No. 119597575.\nRegistered Office: 20 - 22 Wenlock St. London. N1 7GU. United Kingdom.\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 58 of 64\nCase No.: 1:23-cr-00118-AT\nEXHIBIT Z\nExhibit Z: Official Court Record (Dkt. 833) documenting prosecutorial framing by\nattributing the criminal acts of \"Hijackers\" to the defendant to justify sentencing.\n[Filed Under Seal & Ex Parte]\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 59 of 64\n\nfamily at the wedding of one of his daughters, where the Trustee’s three daughters were circled in\nred10:\n(GX 1B124F; see also Tr. 4717).\nBeyond the targeting and attempted intimidation of the Trustee and his family, Guo ordered\nothers to obstruct the court proceedings in other ways. When Ya Li received a subpoena from the\nbankruptcy trustee, Guo told her to “throw it in the rubbish bin,” and she complied because she\nbelieved Guo when he said that the U.S. Department of Justice had been “weaponized by the CCP.”\n(Tr. 1498-99). In connection with the G Enterprise’s efforts to keep assets outside the reach of the\nbankruptcy trustee even after Guo’s arrest, Yongbing Zhang—the attorney and co-conspirator who\n“won” a Lamborghini in the G|CLUBS “sweepstakes,” and with whom Guo who has continued to\n10 The red circles highlighting Despins’s daughters appeared on the photograph that was recovered\nfrom Guo’s cellphone. The Government added only the black redactions, to protect the privacy of\nvictims and/or third parties in this public filing.\n26\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 60 of 64\n\nmeet in the MDC following his arrest and detention—asked Ya Li to sign a false affidavit for filing\nin one of the bankruptcy litigations. (Tr. 1523-29; GX VI 66). When she refused, Zhang threatened\nMs. Li with $38 million in liability. (Tr. 1530). After this threat from Guo’s attorney, Ms. Li\ncontemplated suicide. (Tr. 1530-31).\nMore recently, Guo’s enterprise continues to harass and threaten those that oppose it. On\nMarch 10, 2026, in a video provided to the Government by a victim, Guo’s NFSC presenters\nrequested that Guo’s remaining followers provide statements to Guo’s court appointed counsel. In\naddition, the presenter indicated that the 126 victims who previously provided statements “will all\nhave to bear the consequences.” (Dkt. 832, Stmt. 206-B (translated)).\nThat appears to be a reference to the 126 victim statements filed with the Court on November 22,\n2024. (Dkt. 477).\n3. Guo’s Post-Arrest Obstruction\nEven after his arrest Guo has engaged in obstructive conduct. Guo’s criminal Enterprise\ncontinued to operate following his arrest and Guo continued to direct it as it relocated to the UAE,\noutside the reach of U.S. law enforcement. (PSR ¶¶ 103-105). Following his arrest, Guo’s\n27\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 61 of 64\n\nfollowers sought to fabricate evidence at the Mahwah Mansion to make it appear as if it were a\nG|CLUBS property, rather than Guo’s personal family home. (PSR ¶¶ 91-95). Similarly, following\nGuo’s arrest, one of Guo’s top lieutenants, Brother Long Island, instructed Ya Li and others to\ndelete evidence from their phones in case they were arrested.11 (Tr. 1500-02).\nIV. VICTIM STATEMENTS\nTo date, the Government has received and provided to the Court a total of approximately\n225 victim impact statements. These statements reflect the extreme harm perpetrated by Guo on\nhundreds of victims located throughout the United States, harm that included extreme financial\nhardships, mental anguish, broken family bonds, and contemplation of self-harm including suicide.\nSpecifically, on November 22, 2024, the Government filed a letter attaching approximately\n126 victim statements. (Dkt. 477). On December 11, 2024, the Government filed seven additional\nvictim statements that it had received. Dkt. 482. On January 2, 2025 and January 3, 2025, the\nGovernment filed a total of 16 additional victim statements. (Dkts. 486, 487). The Court has sealed\ndockets 477, 482, 486, and 487, which entries contain the aforementioned statements. On April 7,\n2026, the Government filed an additional 74 statements under seal. (Dkt. 832). These cover letters\nare provided to the Court as an Exhibit, under seal, in light of the Court’s prior ruling.12\nFor the Court’s convenience, the Government will provide a hard copy of all of these victim\nimpact statements to the Court’s chambers.\n11 Prior to Guo’s arrest, Guo himself instructed Ya Li and others to delete evidence from their\nphones. (Tr. 1500-02).\n12 The Government believes that the cover letter at Docket 477, which is attached under seal as\nExhibit A to this filing, should be filed on the docket. That cover letter does not contain any\npersonally identifying information for any victims. It merely summarizes certain statements\nreceived as of that date. Accordingly, the Government respectfully requests permission to file that\nletter on the docket.\n28\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 62 of 64\n\ncommitted through Guo’s complex fraud, money laundering, and racketeering enterprise—or the\nverdict rendered by an impartial jury during the trial presided over by this Court.\nIn assessing specific deterrence and protection of the public, the Court should weigh\nheavily that the defendant has never accepted responsibility for his truly offensive and blatant\nfraud. But Guo’s rejection of responsibility is worse than just that. A defendant is entitled to claim\ninnocence but Guo goes further: he falsely claims victimhood. He attempts to denigrate the rule\nof law that brought him to justice. Such indignancy coupled with Guo’s baseless suggestion of\nimpropriety in the prosecution of this case warrants a substantial sentence. See, e.g., Raniere, Dkt.\n966 at 16 (“To make matters worse, [the defendant] and his counsel . . . are engaged in a public\nrelations campaign to cast doubt on the integrity of the judicial system and the jury verdict.”).\nThird, perhaps most troubling is that Guo, and his enterprise, have continued criminal\nactivities for the three years that Guo has been incarcerated. Following his arrest and detention,\nGuo continued to direct his enterprise as it relocated to the United Arab Emirates (UAE), outside\nthe reach of U.S. law enforcement. (PSR ¶¶ 103-105). Victims who have monitored the online\nmusings of Guo and his remaining acolytes further illustrate how Guo continues to operate his\nenterprise, and uses it stifle victims from speaking out against him:\n• “According to Yue Zhou, the Secretary-General of the New Federal State of China\n(NFSC), in the weekly ‘Until We Meet Again’ program every Friday, he and\nseveral other key members visit Ho Wan Kwok every week. Many of the orders\ncurrently being executed by NFSC have been approved by Kwok.” Dkt. 832, Stmt.\n214.\n• “Despite the arrest of Guo Wengui, the fraud group has not been dismantled. The\nfarms related to it are still operating, and Guo Wengui is still directing members in\nprison, instructing them to continue to defraud and threaten victims. In addition,\nmembers of the fraud gang are lurking in different countries and are still continuing\nto defraud, launder money and cover up crimes.” Dkt. 832, Stmt. 188.\n67\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 63 of 64\nUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS\nFOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT\nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\nIn re: BAO CHU,\nAppellate Case No. 26-1296\nApplicant.\nDistrict Court Case No. 1:23-cr-\n00118-AT\nHon. Analisa Torres\nCERTIFICATE OF OMNIBUS SERVICE\nI,BaoChu, proceedingProSe, herebycertifyunderpenaltyofperjurypursuant\nto 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that on June 15, 2026, I served a true and correct copy of the\n“EMERGENCYMOTIONTOSTRIKESENTENCINGMEMORANDUM(DKT.833)INITS\nENTIRETY,COMPELARULE104EVIDENTIARY(FATICO)HEARING,ANDISSUERULE\n17(c)SUBPOENAS”,alongwiththeFormT-1080MotionInformationStatement,and\nTen (10) Objective Evidentiary Exhibits (Exhibits 1 through 10).\nService was effected concurrently via Electronic Mail to ensure immediate re-\nceiptandtostrictlysatisfytherequirementsofOmnibusServiceuponallpartiesof\nrecord and statutory oversight entities:\n1. Appellate Court (Second Circuit)\nClerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit\nEmail: prosecases@ca2.uscourts.gov\n2. District Court (S.D.N.Y.)\nHon. Analisa Torres, U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.\nEmail: Torres_NYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov; ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov\n3. Counsel for the United States (Prosecution)\nMicah Fergenson, Ryan Finkel, Juliana Murray, Justin Horton\nAssistant United States Attorneys, S.D.N.Y.\nEmail: micah.fergenson@usdoj.gov; ryan.finkel@usdoj.gov;\njuliana.murray@usdoj.gov; justin.horton@usdoj.gov\n1\n\nCase: 26-1296, 06/15/2026, DktEntry: 32.1, Page 64 of 64\n4. Counsel for the Defendants (Defense)\nJohn F. Kaley, Esq.\nEmail: jkaley@doarlaw.com\n(And all relevant defense counsel of record via ECF/email correlation)\n5. Statutory Oversight Entities (Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651)\nDOJOfficeoftheInspectorGeneral(OIG)&OfficeofProfessionalResponsibil-\nity (OPR)\nU.S. House Judiciary Committee (Select Subcommittee on Weaponization)\nI declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.\nExecuted on June 15, 2026.\nRespectfully submitted,\n/s/ Bao Chu\nBao Chu\nApplicant Pro Se /\nBona Fide Third-Party Property Owner\nStanding Confirmed via S.D.N.Y. HID:\nF56BDDZ\n2","body_zh":null,"key_entities":["Guo","Himalaya","forfeiture","Kwok","853(n)","CIPA","Himalaya Exchange","CCP","Ho Wan Kwok","Finkel","Fergenson","Murray","Miles Guo","GETTR","Pro Se","pro se","Despins","Torres","Analisa Torres","Horton","Kaley","853(i)","CVRA","Crime Victim"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":1,"court":"2Cir"},{"doc_number":2,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":14,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":312,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":477,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":482,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":832,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":833,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":966,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":10693,"status":"published","published_at":"2026-05-22 00:00:00","created_at":"2026-05-22","updated_at":"2026-08-17 09:56:37"}