911K@ AB\\*3=CDEA=EFd5;2H9I4/?A8\\*30/JK I/05K41LA8\\*30/24I1954K-3/1245 67895:E4.\\/8N]9P9<42;K-/0895I/P4.,453/1245 67895:ee f69P01<;54/0KI8/KK<;1Ng AB\\*3=CDEA=EFd5;2H9I4/?I/05K41L A8\\*30/24I1954K445 K0>h4I<-<,4b5<485;1B4H4504 648H9I4/8<,4E4.\\/8N6<;<4<;^95:;0<,/89<-@ Q/520I<42/5=7891L\n\n#### t]=EDiTDtd6 \\*\\*-u+++\\*t]=EDiTDtd6\\*QdA\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoOHDZ31KPFiledQ3/119/02/113756086.2 dPage 12 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n11 (41 to 44)\n\n| 1
A.
No. | 41
TECHNICIAN: OK, to the One Direct
1 | 43 |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 2
Q. Are you presently under investigation, | 2
link? Give me one moment. Yes, I see it. | |\n| 3
to the best of your knowledge, for tax fraud? | 3
I am downloading the file now. | |\n| 4
MR. GAVENMAN: On the advice of | Counsel, it's asking me for a
4 | |\n| 5
Mr. Guo's counsel, Mr. Guo declines to | 5
password. | |\n| respond to the question invoking his rights
6 | 6
MR. WOLMAN: Shoot, sorry about that. | |\n| 7
under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. | 7
Q. All right. Why don't we do this. | |\n| Constitution, as well as an objection to
8 | 8
Mr. Kwok, did you review the tax returns that were | |\n| 9
attorney/client privilege. Any | ರ
provided by your counsel to me in this case? | |\n| communications he might, my understanding,
10 | Yes.
10
A. | |\n| he might have about this is subject to
11 | 11
Q. Are you aware that it included certain | |\n| attorney/client privilege.
12 | 12 tax returns? | |\n| 13
MR. WOLMAN: How is acknowledging an | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
13 | |\n| investigation -- not whether or not he
14 | A. I don't recall.
14 | |\n| committed the crime -- self-incrimination?
ો ર | Q. Are you familiar with the accounting
ાં ર | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: He is invoking the | 16 firm named Janover? | |\n| 16 | | |\n| Fifth Amendment is, as is his right to do
17 | A. I think that perhaps it is like a
17 | |\n| 18
SO. | 18 financial or accounting consulting firm, but I | |\n| 19
You can ask a different question | 19 cannot be sure. | |\n| if you like.
20 | Q. Do they prepare your New York State
20
21 and Federal income taxes? | |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer?
21 | | |\n| Yes.
22
A. | Perhaps.
22
A. | |\n| Q. Have you had any income as that term
23
24 is used in the Internal Revenue Code within the | Q. Have you filed taxes for the year
23 | |\n| | 24 2020? | |\n| 25 last five years? | 25
A.
Yes. | |\n| | 42 | 44 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On the advice of
1 | Q. And who was the accountant who
1 | |\n| counsel, Mr. Guo's personal counsel,
2 | 2
prepared the tax returns? | |\n| Mr. Grow declines to respond to the question
3 | 3
I don't recall.
A. | |\n| invoking his rights under the Fifth
4 | Q. When did you file these tax returns?
4 | |\n| 5
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. | 5
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. | |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer the
6 | 6
I don't recall.
A. | |\n| question?
7 | 7
Q. Was it before or after March 25? | |\n| 8
A.
Yes. | | |\n| | I don't recall.
8
A. | |\n| 9
Q. How much income did you report to the | Q. Did you pay any taxes to New York
9 | |\n| 10 Internal Revenue Service in your tax return for | 10 State or the Federal government for the year 2020? | |\n| 11 the fiscal year 2019? | 11
MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel, | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On the advice of
12 | 12
Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question | |\n| counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the
13 | invoking his rights under the Fifth
13 | |\n| question invoking his rights under the Fifth
14 | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
14 | |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
ો ર | MR. WOLMAN: Whether or not he paid
ો ર | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Jeff, you provided me
16 | 16
any taxes is already known to a third-party, | |\n| the tax return.
17 | the government.
17 | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: That was a required
18 | MR. GAVENMAN: He is not going to
18 | |\n| record exception. That doesn't mean he can
19 | provide any testimony about it.
19 | |\n| answer a question about it.
20 | Q. Mr. Guo, are you refusing to answer?
20 | |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer?
21 | Yes.
21
A. | |\n| Yes.
22
A. | 22
Q. When your tax returns are prepared, do | |\n| Just one second.
Q.
23 | 23 you provide your tax preparer all information | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: OK. Ms. Hooper. I just
24
up uploaded some documents in a zip file.
ટર્ર | 24 about your income?
25
MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's | |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:186.3 dPage 13 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n12 (45 to 48)\n\n| વર્સ | 001100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 | 47 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | information to the United States immigration | |\n| 2
question invoking his rights under the Fifth | authorities in connection with your application | |\n| 3
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. | 3
for asylum? | |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer the
4 | 4
No.
A. | |\n| 5
question? | 5
Q. Are you familiar with law firm named | |\n| 6
Yes.
A. | Baker Hostetler?
6 | |\n| 7
Q. Have you received any communications | 7
A. I don't recall this name. I am very | |\n| from the New York State taxing authority regarding
8 | 8
confused with English names. | |\n| ರ
potential tax fraud? | ರ
Q. Are you aware of a lawsuit -- you | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's
10 | 10 strike that. | |\n| counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the
11 | You mentioned the Pacific Alliance
11 | |\n| question invoking his rights under the Fifth
12 | 12 lawsuit previously, correct? | |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, as well
13 | A. Yes.
13 | |\n| as attorney/client privilege as a separate
14 | 14
Q. Do you know who your attorneys are or | |\n| basis for objection.
ી ર | 15 the law firm is for that case? | |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer?
16 | I don't recall.
A.
16 | |\n| A.
Yes.
17 | Q. Did you receive bills for services
17 | |\n| 18
Q. Have you received any communications | 18 rendered on your behalf in that case? | |\n| 19 from the United States Internal Revenue Service or | I don't recall.
19
A. | |\n| 20 the U.S. Department of Treasury or U.S. Department | Q. Are bills paid to whoever is
20 | |\n| 21 of Justice regarding potential tax fraud? | 21 representing you in that case? | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Once again, on advice
22 | A. Of course they should be paid.
22 | |\n| of Mr. Guo's counsel, Mr. Guo declines to
23 | 23
Who is paying those bills?
Q. | |\n| respond to the question invoking his rights
24 | Golden Spring.
24
A. | |\n| under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S.
25 | 25
Q. Does Baker & Hostetler or whatever law | |\n| 46 | | 48 |\n| 1
Constitution, and once again, another | firm is representing you in that case have a fee | |\n| 2
objection based on attorney/client | agreement with Golden Spring?
2 | |\n| 3
privilege. | 3
A. I don't recall. | |\n| 4
Q. Are you refusing to answer? | Q. Does any attorney representing you in
4 | |\n| 5
A.
Yes. | 5
this case have a fee agreement with Golden Spring? | |\n| 6
Q. In the past seven years have you | 6
I don't know.
A. | |\n| provided false information in a tax return to the
7 | Q. Why does Golden Spring pay your bills
7 | |\n| 8
United States or to the state of New York? | for representation in the Pacific Alliance
8 | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's
9 | 9 lawsuit? | |\n| 10
counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | 10
MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's | |\n| question invoking his rights under the Fifth
11 | 11
counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
12 | question invoking his rights under the Fifth
12 | |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer?
13 | | |\n| | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
13 | |\n| 14
A.
Yes. | A.
Yes.
14 | |\n| Q. In the past seven years, have you
ો ર | Q.
Are you refusing to answer?
ો ર | |\n| 16 knowingly provided any false information in a tax | 16
A.
Yes. | |\n| 17 return to the State of New York or the Internal | Q. Are you familiar with attorneys named
17 | |\n| 18 Revenue Service? | 18 Chris Rose or Silvestri? | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel,
19 | I don't recall.
19
A. | |\n| 20 Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question | Q. Do you recall the name of the attorney
20 | |\n| 21 invoking his rights under the Fifth | 21 who represented you prior to Mr. Gavenman in | |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
22 | 22 Nevada? | |\n| 23
Q. Are you refusing to answer? | 23
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. | |\n| Yes.
24
A.
25
Q. Have you provided any false | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, did you
24
say something?
ટર્ટ | |\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g86.4 dPage 14 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n13 (49 to 52)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 49 | રી |\n|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|\n| MR. GAVENMAN: I said objection to | Q. Where is Golden Spring New York |\n| 2 | 2 |\n| form. | getting the funds to pay your bills? |\n| 3
A. I don't recall the counsel's name. | 3
I don't know.
A. |\n| Q. Did you have a fee agreement with the | 4 |\n| 4 | Q. When Golden Spring makes payments on |\n| law firm that preceded Mr. Gavenman in the Nevada | 5 |\n| 5 | your behalf, how do you let Golden Spring know |\n| litigation? | that a payment needs to be made? |\n| 6 | 6 |\n| 7 | 7 |\n| A. What name again you said? | A. That is all arranged by Golden Spring. |\n| Q. Whichever law firm it was. | 8 |\n| 8 | Q. By whom at Golden Spring? |\n| I don't recall. | 9 |\n| 9 | Counselors, lawyers. |\n| A. | A. |\n| Q. Who paid the bills of the law firm | Q. Let me try to do it this way. Does |\n| 10 | 10 |\n| 11 representing you in the Nevada lawsuit against | 11 Mr. Gavenman send you a bill? |\n| 12 Mr. Cheng? | A. I never receive bills that counsel
12 |\n| A. Golden Spring.
13 | 13 sent to me. |\n| Q. Why did Golden Spring pay those bills? | Q. Where does he send the bills? |\n| 14 | 14 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's | A. Send to the lawyer in Golden Spring. |\n| । ਦ | 15 |\n| counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | Q. So Mr. Gavenman's fee agreement -- |\n| 16 | 16 |\n| question invoking his rights under the Fifth
17 | 17 strike that. |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. | So Mr. Gavenman's bills go directly to |\n| 18 | 18 |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer?
19 | 19 Mr. Podhaskie? |\n| Yes. | I don't know. |\n| A. | 20 |\n| 20 | A. |\n| Q. What are the -- what is the income of | Q. How do you know Golden Spring is |\n| 21 | 21 |\n| 22 Golden Spring New York Limited? | 22 paying Mr. Gavenman? |\n| I don't know. | I don't know. |\n| 23 | 23 |\n| A. | A. |\n| Q. How does Golden Spring New York | Q. Did Golden Spring have any role in |\n| 24 | 24 |\n| 25 Limited generate revenue? | 25 deciding to sue Mr. Cheng? |\n| | |\n| నే) | રેટ |\n| 1
A.
I don't know. | MR. GAVENMAN: I caution you not to
1 |\n| 2 | 2 |\n| Q. What are the assets of Golden Spring | reveal any attorney/client communications in |\n| New York Limited? | 3 |\n| 3 | this answer. |\n| 4 | 4 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's | You can answer if you can. |\n| 5
counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | 5
I don't know.
A. |\n| question invoking his rights under the Fifth | 6 |\n| 6 | Q. A judgment was issued against you in |\n| 7 | Nevada. How did you receive that judgment? |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. | 7 |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Jeff -- Jeff, that's a | 8 |\n| 8 | A. I did not receive it. |\n| question about Golden Spring assets, that is | Q. Have you ever seen a copy of the |\n| 9 | ರಿ |\n| 10
not a party and, my understanding, is not | 10 judgment from the Nevada court against you? |\n| your client? How is there a Fifth Amendment
11 | No.
11
A. |\n| issue here? | Q. Did you ever receive anything in the |\n| 12 | 12 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: There is a Fifth
13 | 13 mail from Randazza Legal Group sent to you at the |\n| Amendment issue so he is declining to
14 | 14 Sherry-Netherland? |\n| respond.
ો ર | 15
No.
A. |\n| MR. WOLMAN: How? | Q. Do you receive mail at the |\n| 16 | 16 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Jay, I can't answer
17 | 17 Sherry-Netherland? |\n| that question for you. That's the answer, | A. Yes, we can receive mail -- well, I |\n| 18 | 18 |\n| he is invoking his Fifth Amendment rights.
19 | 19 want counsel you understand this. You see mail |\n| He needs to not respond.
20 | 20 can be received. But the thing is I really cannot |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer, Mr. Kwok?
21 | 21 read English and so I won't read anything in |\n| Yes.
22
A. | 22 English. I was not able to read anything in |\n| Q. Does Golden Spring New York Limited
23 | 23 English. |\n| 24 have any bank accounts? | So that mails could be received, but I
24 |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZ31KPFileDd3/119/02/113722113:56:186.5 dPage 15 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n14 (53 to 56)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| રે રે | રેરે |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| you put them in front of me today, I won't be able
to read them either. | 1 like a representative of Democratic parties and so |\n| 2 | on and so forth and wanting to come upstairs and |\n| 3
So I am saying that, yes, mails can be
received, but I, myself personally won't read them. | presenting sort of threats.
3
So therefore, nowadays in
4 |\n| 4
5
I myself personally did not receive them. | ഗ |\n| б
Who did? | Sherry-Netherland, that they know the security |\n| ().
7
Golden Spring. | 6 threats that posted, and so therefore, that they |\n| A.
Q. How does mail get from the
8 | were very careful about dealing with all kind of
8 documents and the source of documents and so that |\n| | |\n| Sherry-Netherland Hotel directed to you into the
9
10 hands of Golden Spring? | 9 would have special arrangement between them and |\n| A. I don't know.
11 | 10 Golden Spring legal team.
11 |\n| 12 | And so anyway, really, because it
12 is about this -- it's like a warfare nation is |\n| Q. Then how do you know Golden Spring is | |\n| 13 getting your mail? | 13 targeting me as an individual. |\n| A. It is because after receiving them,
14 | Q. So to be clear, before you look at any
14 - |\n| 15 the lawyer in Golden Spring, Daniel, would have | 15 piece of mail, someone at Golden Spring is reading |\n| 16 talked to me and told me they received the | 16 it first, correct?
A. Not necessarily. |\n| 17 whatever. And then they would need to get the | 17 |\n| 18 translator and translating those letters, so that
19 I would know about those letters. | Q. How is it then determined that you
18 |\n| | 19 need to have it, a piece of mail, translated for |\n| 20
Well, you see it will be -- you know | 20 you?
I don't know.
A. |\n| 21 that at the present time, there are 60 some lawsuits | 21
Q. Is everybody affiliated -- strike
22 |\n| 22 going on and they were involved because of the CCP's
23 threat against me, the Chinese Communist Party | 23 that. |\n| 24 threat against me, and they have done all these kind | Is everybody employed by Golden Spring
24 |\n| | |\n| | |\n| 25 of restricted warfare against me, threatening me. | 25 New York a lawyer? |\n| રત | 56 |\n| And so, you see, they sometimes | A.
No.
1 |\n| would send me things or letters probably with
2 | 2
Is Golden Spring New York a law firm?
O. |\n| toxins inside, threatening letters about my death
3 | 3
No.
A. |\n| 4
and about my -- anything that is threatening to my | 4
Q. So any time, for example, Mr. Gavenman |\n| 5
person. | 5
sends you a letter or a bill, Golden Spring gets |\n| 6
So that is why the things received would | it before you do?
6
A. |\n| 7
have to go through some security teams and security | 7
I cannot be sure. |\n| people to make sure that whether it has contained
8 | 8
Q. How would you find out? |\n| 9 any toxicity, whether it is any threatening letters, | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
9 |\n| 10 whether it should be reported to the police or | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, were you
10 |\n| 11 whether it should be dealt with by the legal people. | saying something?
11
12 |\n| 12 And then this if some needed for me to know, then
13 they have to go through the translations and all | MR. GAVENMAN: I just said objection
13
to form. |\n| 14 kind of protocols. So it is rather complicated. | But he can answer.
14 |\n| 15 | A. Because sometimes the people from
15 |\n| So because also, you see there
16 are times that there are documents of thousands of | |\n| 17 pages, documents sent to me from unknown part of | 16 Golden Spring would contact me or sometimes the
17 lawyer would contact me. |\n| 18 the world from I don't even know where, and those | Q. Who are the nonlawyers at Golden
18 |\n| 19 documents would have a lot of like threatening | 19 Spring who would contact you? |\n| 20 language, sometimes contain perhaps innuendoes and | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
20 |\n| 21 implications and so on and so forth. | I cannot recall.
21
A. |\n| And sometimes they would have
22 | Q. Is Golden Spring New York at all
22 |\n| 23 pretty girls downstairs at the lobby and claiming | 23 funded by the Chinese Communist Party? |\n| 24 that they have documents for me and sometimes | Of course not.
24
A. |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZ3IK PFiled Q3/119/2254 Enteried 03/113722113:56:16 of Page 16 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n15 (57 to 60)\n\n1 - 1 - 1 10001\n\n| Conducted on April 1, 2021 | |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| રે તે | રતે |\n| anyone in the People's Republic of China? | wanted to take a quick break, but I just have a |\n| 2
I don't know.
A. | couple of questions before we do that. |\n| 3
Q. How were you able to answer with | 3
A. G-E-T -- T-E-E-R, yes. |\n| certainty that the Chinese Communist Party does
4 | Q. What is that device you were holding
4 |\n| not fund it when you previously testified that you
5 | 5
in your hand just a moment ago? |\n| do not know its income sources?
6 | 6
My cell phone.
A. |\n| 7
A. Well, you see that based on what I | 7
And what kind of cell phone is it?
0. |\n| know is that Golden Spring had been on the list of
8 | Apple.
8
A. |\n| 9 the at risk entity made by the Communist Party and | And when did you -- when was it
9
Q. |\n| 10 also as I know that Golden Spring sometimes will | 10 purchased? |\n| 11 be rejected by bank for having a bank account with | One week ago.
11
A. |\n| 12 the bank. | And who purchased it?
12
Q. |\n| And as far as I know, that I,
13 | I don't know.
13
A. |\n| 14 myself and Golden Spring was also being listed by | Q. How did it get in your hands?
14 |\n| 15 the Chinese Communist Party as a number 1 national | It's in the office.
15
A. |\n| 16 enemy. And there are lots of employees in the | Q. Some unknown person left it for you in
16 |\n| 17 Golden Spring disappeared and arrested in China, a | 17 an office, is that what you are saying? |\n| 18 lot of videos of such have been circulated online | A. Well, I don't know who actually got
18 |\n| 19 and that is really a very basic knowledge to | 19 it. |\n| 20 everyone. | What happened was I told the
20 |\n| Q. Can you please name the employees of
21 | 21 lawyer, I said my phone was hacked again because |\n| 22 Golden Spring that you state were arrested or | 22 you see my phone always gets hacked, nearly every |\n| 23 disappeared? | 23 week was hacked. |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
24 | So I said my phone was hacked and
24 |\n| | |\n| A. At this point, I actually don't recall
25 | 25 so I need to have a new phone. |\n| રેક | 60 |\n| 1 their names, but then there are lots of such | Who paid for the phone?
Q. |\n| 2 videos and information circulated online. You can | 2
I don't know.
A. |\n| just have a search for it.
3 | Q. Does it have a cellular data plan?
3 |\n| Q. You previously testified that you made
4 | 4
I don't know.
A. |\n| a video this morning and uploaded it. On what
5 | Q. In whose name does the cellular data
5 |\n| system did you upload it?
6 | plan exist?
6 |\n| GTV Geteer.
7
A. | I don't know.
7
A. |\n| 8
THE REPORTER: Can you spell that? | 8
Q. Can you show the home screen right |\n| THE WITNESS: I don't know how to
9 | 9 now? On camera? |\n| spell that. I can only tell you the Chinese
10 | (Witness complies)
10
A. |\n| name is GTV Geteer.
11 | Turn it around.
11
Q. |\n| 12
THE REPORTER: Geteer, just | 12
And can you unlock it so we can |\n| confirming.
13 | |\n| 14
THE INTERPRETER: I don't know. I am | 13 see the data carrier? Can you hold that up to the |\n| ો ર | 14 camera? Closer. Can you get within inches of it, |\n| actually --
16 | 15 please?
16 |\n| A. Hold own. Let me check, do you want
17 me to find out the name? | MR. GAVENMAN: What is the possible
relevance of what's on his home screen? I
17 |\n| 18
Sure.
Q. | actually really object to this. What are we
18 |\n| 19 | 19 |\n| A. Because I don't have anything in here, | doing with his personal home screen and his
20 |\n| 20 so I just really need to -- note paper, nothing, | phone? There is no reason he has to be
21 |\n| 21 so I just need to go and check. G-E-T-E-R.
Q. So that's the name, GTV Geteer,
22 | showing his personal home screen on his
22 |\n| 23 G-E-T-E-E-R? | telephone.
23 |\n| OK.
A.
24 | MR. WOLMAN: I'm looking to see who
the carrier is.
24 |\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:16.7 dPage 17 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n16 (61 to 64)\n\n| | 61 | | | | 63 |\n|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 1 | OK, I can't read it. In the | 1 | phone? | | |\n| 2 | upper left corner, what are the letters? | 2 | A. | I don't know. | |\n| 3 | No letters.
A. | 3 | | Q. Do you text anyone from that phone? | |\n| 4 | Q. Does it say \"AT&T\" or \"Verizon\" or -- | 4 | A. | No, I don't know. | |\n| 5 | No.
A. | 5 | | Q. Do you call anyone from that phone? | |\n| 6 | -- T-Mobile?
Q. | 6 | A. | I don't know. | |\n| 7 | No.
A. | 7 | | Q. Does anybody call you on that phone? | |\n| 8 | Q. I'm going to ask that you do a screen | 8 | A. | I don't know. | |\n| 9 | capture of the home screen. | 9 | | Q. Without revealing the contents of any | |\n| 10 | MR. GAVENMAN: No, no, we are not | | | 10 conversation, have you spoken to Mr. Gavenman on | |\n| 11 | doing that. We are not doing that. Come | 11 the phone? | | | |\n| 12 | on. | 12 | | A. No. | |\n| 13 | This is ridiculous. He doesn't need | 13 | | Q. Prior to today, have you ever spoken | |\n| 14 | to do a screen capture of his personal cell | | | 14 with Mr. Gavenman? | |\n| ] ર | phone screen. That's just -- we are not | 15 | A. | I don't recall. | |\n| 16 | doing that. | 16 | | Q. Did you go down to Baltimore to meet | |\n| 17 | MR. WOLMAN: Jeff, he brought it to a | | | 17 with Mr. Gavenman? | |\n| 18 | deposition. | 18 | A. | No. | |\n| 19 | MR. GAVENMAN: You had him get it for | 19 | | Q. Did Mr. Gavenman come up to New York | |\n| 20 | his deposition. He is not looking at it | | | 20 to meet with you? | |\n| 21 | other than to tell you one name of an app or | 21 | A. | No. | |\n| 22 | whatever that was. | 22 | | Q. How do you communicate with | |\n| 23 | He is not doing a screen capture | | | 23 Mr. Gavenman? | |\n| 24 | and sending it to you. It's not | 24 | A. | I don't recall. | |\n| 25 | happening. | 25 | | Q. Did you prepare for this deposition -- | |\n| | 62 | | | | 64 |\n| | | | | | |\n| 1 | Q. What is the phone number that someone | 1 | strike that. | | |\n| 2 | could use to call you on that phone? | 2 | | Did Mr. Gavenman assist you in | |\n| 3 | MR. GAVENMAN: That's another thing | 3 | | preparing for this deposition? | |\n| 4 | I'm going to object to. He doesn't have to | 4 | A. | Yes. | |\n| 5 | answer that. | 5 | | Q. Without revealing the contents of any | |\n| 6 | There is no reason he has to give | 6 | | of that preparation, did you meet in person? | |\n| 7 | his personal cell phone number on this | 7 | A. | No. | |\n| 8 | transcript. There is no possible | 8 | | Q. Through what means did you communicate | |\n| 9 | reason. It is harassing. There is no | ರ | | with Mr. Gavenman? | |\n| 10 | reason for this. Let's move on to | 10 | | A. I don't know what kind of a form that | |\n| 11 | relevant questions. | 11 was. | | | |\n| 12 | It has been two hours and 15 | 12 | | Q. Did you have a phone call with him? | |\n| 13 | minutes of a marathon session and you | 13 | A. | No. | |\n| 14 | haven't gotten to relevant questions | 14 | 0. | Did you have a video meeting like this | |\n| ાં ર | yet. | 15 with them? | | | |\n| 16 | Q. Please answer the question. | 16 | A. | Yes. | |\n| 17 | MR. GAVENMAN: You don't have to | 17 | Q. | And how did you get the link? | |\n| 18 | answer what your current personal cell phone | 18 | | A. Arranged by the lawyer. | |\n| 19 | is. | 19 | | Q. How was it transmitted to you? | |\n| 20 | MR. WOLMAN: I'm allowed to find out | 20 | | A. I went into the room and the | |\n| 21 | who is paying the bill for his personal cell | | | 21 connection was made. | |\n| 22 | phone as you represented. | 22 | | Q. How did you know the URL to connect? | |\n| 23 | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, what | 23 | | A. I don't know about the URL. It was | |\n| 24
25 | question should I be interpreting?
Q. What is the phone number for that | 25 Spring. | | 24 all connected by the lawyers and the Golden | |\n\n| | | Case 22:5007:20 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 | |\n|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| | | | |\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n17 (65 to 68)\n\n| ર્ણ્ટ
Q. For today's deposition, how did you | In connection with your | 67 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 2
obtain the URL on the device you were using to | 2
application for asylum, did you state that you or | |\n| 3
broadcast today? | any member of your family committed any crime in
3 | |\n| 4
A. It was arranged by the lawyer in | the United States?
4 | |\n| 5 | 5
No.
A. | |\n| Golden Spring. | | |\n| 6
Q. Was the lawyer at Golden Spring
7 | 6
Q. When did you apply for asylum?
7 | |\n| literally in that room this morning at | September 2017.
A. | |\n| 8
approximately 10 a.m.? | 8
Q. Prior to September 2017, did you | |\n| 9
A. Well, when I stepped into the room, | submit any false information knowingly in
9 | |\n| 10 the room was already empty and everything is | 10 connection with a tax return to the Federal | |\n| 11 already connected. It's ready. I don't -- I did | 11 government or New York State'? | |\n| 12 not see anyone. | MR. GAVENMAN: On the advice of
12 | |\n| 13
Q. Who literally pressed on the link to | Mr. Guo's counsel, Mr. Guo declines to
13 | |\n| 14 connect? | respond to the question invoking his Fifth
14 | |\n| A. So I pressed the link and then I went
15 | Amendment rights under the U.S.
ો ર | |\n| 16 in. | Constitution.
16 | |\n| 17
Q. And how did the link get on to the | Q. Are you refusing to answer?
17 | |\n| 18 device that you pressed? | Yes.
18
A. | |\n| I don't know.
19
A. | Q. In connection with your application
19 | |\n| 20
Q. Does your phone have an e-mail account | 20 for asylum, did you invoke your rights under the | |\n| 2.1 associated with it? | 21 Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? | |\n| A. I don't have e-mail.
22 | A. I don't understand your question.
22 | |\n| 23
Q. Have you ever had an e-mail account? | Q. With respect to your application for
23 | |\n| A. Ihave never used e-mail ever since at
24 | 24 asylum, did you claim the protection of the Fifth | |\n| 25 school. Even though the Chinese Communist Party | 25 Amendment as you are doing now? | |\n| | | |\n| 66 | | 68 |\n| 1 fabricated the information that I have lots of | A. Istill don't understand that
1 | |\n| 2 e-mail addresses, I actually have not one. I have | 2
question. | |\n| 3
never used e-mail ever. | 3
Q. Did you refuse to answer any questions | |\n| 4
Q. So are you saying that there is no | on your application for asylum on the grounds that
4 | |\n| 5
e-mail account associated with the video upload | 5
it would incriminate you in a crime? | |\n| 6
service you used this morning? | 6
A. I still don't understand the question. | |\n| 7
That's correct.
A. | 7
Q. Did you refuse to answer any questions | |\n| 8
Q. Why don't we take a break. | on your asylum application?
8 | |\n| (Recess; 12:22 p.m. to 12:45 p.m.)
9 | 9
A. Istill don't understand that | |\n| 10
Q. Mr. Kwok, previously you testified | 10 question. | |\n| 11 that everything that -- your application for | Q. Did you apply for asylum?
11 | |\n| 12 asylum I guess was accurate, correct? | 12
A.
Yes. | |\n| 13
Yes.
A. | 13
Q.
Were there questions? | |\n| Q. Do you recall filling out a form I589?
14 | Yes.
14
A. | |\n| A. No, I don't recall.
। ਦ | Q.
Did you answer all those questions?
ો ર | |\n| Q. Do you recall a question on an
16 | 16
A.
Yes. | |\n| 17 application for an asylum that states, \"Have you | Did you refuse to provide any
Q.
17 | |\n| 18 or any member of your family included in the | 18 information in answering those questions? | |\n| 19 application ever committed any crime and/or been | 19
A. I don't understand. | |\n| 20 arrested, charged, convicted or sentenced for any | Q. Did you give all of the information
20 | |\n| 21 crimes in the United States, including for an | 21 that was requested on your application for asylum? | |\n| | 22 | |\n| 22 immigration law violation?\"
23
A.
I don't recall. | MR. GAVENMAN: I'm going to caution
23 | |\n| 24 | you not to reveal any attorney/client
24 | |\n| Q. Then let me ask you, have you or --
25 strike that. | communications that may have informed your
understanding of what the application
ટર્ર | |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/129122113:56:18 9 dPage 19 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n18 (69 to 72)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| હતે | | 71 |\n|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|----|\n| required or what you provided.
l | objection. That didn't fix the issue at | |\n| 2
A. Yes. Yes, I answered yes. | all. The only way to have any knowledge or | |\n| 3
Q. Do you know if you have a particular | understanding about what he is required to
3 | |\n| obligation to update the information provided in
4 | provide --
4 | |\n| connection with your asylum application?
5 | 5
MR. WOLMAN: That is false, that is | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection, objection.
6 | false. What he knows is what he knows.
6 | |\n| 7
The only way he would have any understanding | 7
MR. GAVENMAN: How would he know it, | |\n| 8
of that is through attorney/client | 8 Jay? How would he understand what the U.S. | |\n| 9
communications. He can't answer that | law requires? Come on.
9 | |\n| without attorney/client communications.
10 | MR. WOLMAN: How would he know. So
10 | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: I entirely disagree with
11 | 11 you are saying immigrants have no obligation | |\n| that assessment.
12 | 12 to know the law? | |\n| Q. Are you refusing to answer that
13 | MR. GAVENMAN: He would have an
13 | |\n| 14 question on the advice of counsel? | 14 understanding from counsel about what the | |\n| Yes.
15
A. | 15 law requires. | |\n| Q. Have you ever provided updated
16 | MR. WOLMAN: We haven't even
16 | |\n| 17 information to the U.S. Government in connection | 17 established that he used an attorney. | |\n| 18 with your application for asylum? | MR. GAVENMAN: You know he was
18 | |\n| 19
MR. GAVENMAN: And this -- I'm going | 19 represented by an attorney. | |\n| to caution you not to reveal any
20 | Counsel, let's ask a more
20 | |\n| attorney/client communications.
21 | 21 fundamental question, what in the world | |\n| To the extent you can answer, you
22 | 22 are you talking about his immigration | |\n| can, but please don't reveal
23 | 23 application, his asylum application? | |\n| attorney/client communications.
24 | MR. WOLMAN: Mark, quiet.
24 | |\n| 25
MR. WOLMAN: Jeff, I'm asking what he | MR. GAVENMAN: Mark, do you want to
25 | |\n| | | |\n| 70 | | 72 |\n| gave. Don't coach your witness.
l | appear in New York -- | |\n| 2
MR. GAVENMAN: That's not coaching my | MR. RANDAZZA: No.
2 | |\n| 3
witness. You asked if there was ever a | 3
MR. GAVENMAN: And get some | |\n| 4
supplement. You don't know if it is on his | out-of-your-jurisdiction practice, go ahead.
4 | |\n| 5
behalf, what he did. | This asylum application has no
5 | |\n| 6
I said don't reveal any | relevance to this proceeding whatsoever. I
6 | |\n| 7
attorney/client communications and | don't know why you're asking about it and
7 | |\n| 8
that's it. That's the instruction. | I'm getting close to instructing the witness
8 | |\n| 9
It's not anything obstructive. it's | not to answer any more questions about it.
ರ | |\n| just informing the witness not to reveal
10 | This is completely outside of the
10 | |\n| anything attorney/client --
11 | scope of these deposition, you have
11 | |\n| Just answer the question.
12
Q. | asked questions about it for several
12 | |\n| I don't recall.
A.
13 | minutes now. You know --
13 | |\n| Q. Have you withheld any information from
14 | (Simultaneous crosstalk)
14 | |\n| 15 U.S. immigration authorities that you were | MR. WOLMAN: Stop coaching.
ાં ર | |\n| 16 required to provide? | 16
MR. GAVENMAN: It's not coaching, | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection. The only
17 | that's an objection based on privilege.
17 | |\n| way he would have any understanding of what
18 | That's not coaching.
18 | |\n| he was required to provide is through
19 | 19 BY MR. WOLMAN: | |\n| counsel.
20 | 20
Q. Mr. Guo, answer the question. | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: I will rephrase.
21 | 21
MR. GAVENMAN: You know he was | |\n| Q. Mr. Guo, have you knowingly withheld
22 | represented by counsel in that proceeding.
22 | |\n| 23 any information you are required to provide with | You know he is getting advice from counsel
23 | |\n| 24 the immigration -- | what the requirements are. You are starting
24 | |\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g80 dPage 20 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n19 (73 to 76)\n\n| 73 | | 75 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 1
attorney/client communications like you're | 1
willy-nilly basis when sometimes you are | |\n| 2
not supposed to. | 2
going to testify about the crimes you did or | |\n| 3
BY MR. WOLMAN: | 3
did not commit and then say no, Fifth | |\n| 4
Q. Mr. Guo, answer the question. | Amendment?
4 | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Don't answer the
5 | 5
MR. GAVENMAN: Strike the answer, he | |\n| 6
question. There is an attorney/client | 6
is invoking the Fifth Amendment. We are not | |\n| 7
objection. He can't answer the question | 7
addressing any bit of his income or taxes or | |\n| 8
without attorney/client communications. | 8
anything like that. | |\n| 9
MR. WOLMAN: That is false. | 9
MR. WOLMAN: I'm not agreeing to | |\n| 10 BY MR. WOLMAN: | strike anything. Thank you.
10 | |\n| Q. Answer the question?
11 | Q. Mr. Kwok, are you refusing to answer
11 | |\n| THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, I don't
12 | 12 the question? | |\n| know if I interpreted that question or not.
13 | A. I don't. I don't have. Very simple
13 | |\n| Do you mind to repeat that
14 | 14 answer. I don't. | |\n| question?
ાં ર | ાં ર
Q. Do you have any assets? | |\n| Q. Have you knowingly withheld any
16 | MR. GAVENMAN: On the advice of
16 | |\n| 17 information that you were required to provide U.S. | counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the
17 | |\n| 18 immigration authorities? | question invoking his rights under the Fifth
18 | |\n| 19
MR. GAVENMAN: Same objection. | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
19 | |\n| 20
A. I don't understand this question | Q. Are you refusing to answer?
20 | |\n| 21 actually. | 21
A.
Yes. | |\n| Q. Have you told U.S. immigration
22 | 22
Q. Do you own the clothes you are | |\n| 23 authorities whether or not you have committed tax | 23 wearing? | |\n| 24 fraud? | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of his
24 | |\n| 25 A. A. No. But I have never committed any | counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the
25 | |\n| | | |\n| 74 | | 76 |\n| tax fraud. So why would he I need to tell them
1 | 1
question invoking his rights under the Fifth | |\n| 2
that. | 2
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. | |\n| 3
Q. If you have not committed tax fraud, | 3
Q. Are you refusing to answer? | |\n| are all of your income tax returns that you've
4 | Yes.
4
A. | |\n| submitted to the U.S. Government in the State of
5 | 5
Q. I see that you're drinking something | |\n| 6
New York accurate? | in a tea glass. Who paid for the contents?
6 | |\n| 7
MR. GAVENMAN: On the advice of | 7
A. Golden Spring. | |\n| 8
counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | 8
Q. Does Golden Spring buy your groceries? | |\n| 9
question invoking his rights under the Fifth | 9
Sometimes, yes.
A. | |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
10 | 10
Q. Why does Golden Spring pay for your | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Mr. Guo just told us
11 | 11 groceries? | |\n| that he never committed tax fraud.
12 | 12
MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Understood. He is not
13 | counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the
13 | |\n| going to testify about it.
14 | question invoking his rights under the Fifth
14 | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: He just did.
ો ર | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
ો ર | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: He is not going to
16 | Q. Are you refusing to answer?
16 | |\n| testify anymore about it.
17 | A.
Yes.
17 | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: This is not a piecemeal
18 | Who pays for your clothes?
Q.
18 | |\n| thing. You are either accepting the
19 | Golden Spring.
19
A. | |\n| protections of the Fifth Amendment or you
20 | Why does Golden Spring pay for your
20
Q. | |\n| are not.
21 | 21 clothes? | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: We are certainly
22 | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel,
22 | |\n| 23
invoking the protections of the Fifth | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question
23 | |\n| Amendment.
24
25
MR. WOLMAN: You can't do it on a | invoking his rights under the Fifth
24
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
25 | |\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/10/02/254Enteried003/113:56:16:1 dPage 21 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n20 (77 to 80)\n\n| 77 | 79 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|\n| Are you refusing to answer?
O. | Please, please.
(). |\n| 2
Yes.
A. | 2
A. (In English) I no stop, that is my |\n| 3
Are you, remind me, at the
Q. | 3
power. |\n| Sherry-Netherland residence right now?
4 | MR. WOLMAN: We are calling the court
4 |\n| 5
Yes.
A. | 5
right now. |\n| 6
Q.
Does anybody live with you? | 6
The contact information is -- |\n| 7
A. Sometimes my family will be here. | 7
this deposition is paused for right now. |\n| 8
Are you married?
Q. | 8
MR. GAVENMAN: Miles, you can go off |\n| 9
Yes.
A. | mute, go off camera. I will be joining the
の |\n| 10
Q. Where does your wife live? | court line momentarily.
10 |\n| She lives in her place.
11
A. | (Counsel agree to go off the
11 |\n| 12
Q.
Where is that? | record.)
12 |\n| A. I can't tell you her information.
13 | (Recess; 1:09 p.m. to 1:39 p.m.)
13 |\n| 14 That is about her. | MR. WOLMAN: We just had a conference
14 |\n| Why not?
ો ર
(). | with the judge in which it was indicated
ો ર |\n| A. Well, it is because the question that
16 | that there would be submissions with
16 |\n| 17 you are asking exactly what the CCP wanted to ask | regarding the invocation of the Fifth
17 |\n| 18 and you representing Cheng Shuiyan's case and that | Amendment privilege as has been done here
18 |\n| 19 is because you are a hooligan counsel representing | today. And that if the judge finds that it
19 |\n| 20 the CCP and all the questions you are asking were | has been overbroad, that I would be
20 |\n| 21 irrelevant to the case, but threatening to the | permitted to ask questions regarding assets
21 |\n| 22 life -- the safety of my wife and that is exactly | at a separate continued deposition date.
22 |\n| 23 what the information that -- what the CCP wanted | And so what we are going to do right
23 |\n| 24 to know. So I can't tell you that. | now is move beyond some asset-related
24 |\n| Well, it is because you see also in the
25 | 25
inquiry and move back to some other |\n| 78 | 80 |\n| past, all this time that it was CCP, I am CCP's | 1
questions. |\n| 2 number one enemy, and all this time that there were | 2
THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, let me |\n| 3 so many cases, such as like the Department of | 3
interpret that part first. |\n| 4 Justice, Higginbotham being bribed, and Elliott | Q. You indicated that your wife does not
4 |\n| 5 Broidy being bribed, and they were also like trying | 5
live with you. Do you have any children? |\n| 6 to kidnap me or arrest me or hurting me, and then | 6
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. |\n| trying to suss out all the information about me and
7 | 7
You can answer. |\n| 8
my wife. | 8
A. A son and a daughter. |\n| 9
And then, in fact, the questions | ರ
Q. What are their names? |\n| 10 that you are asking me were exactly what the CCP | 10
Guo Quiang, Guo Mei.
A. |\n| 11 wanted to know all the time online and getting | |\n| | |\n| | 11
(Reporter clarification) |\n| 12 people to try to find out this information. | Q. Do either of your children live with
12 |\n| So -- and you did not talk anything
13 | 13 you? |\n| 14 about the case that is involving Cheng Shuiyan. And | 14
No.
A. |\n| 15 all this time you were just helping the CCP, sussing | ાં ર
Are they over 18?
Q. |\n| 16 out my information and trying to hurt me and trying | Yes.
16
A. |\n| 17 to harm me. | Q. Have you discussed your litigation,
17 |\n| And so for the safety sake, that
18 | 18 either in Nevada or this case with Mr. Cheng, with |\n| 19 is the least I can do to protect my family, I am | 19 either of your children? |\n| 20 not answer your question. In fact, you are not | A. No.
20 |\n| 21 even a hooligan counsel, lawyer -- | 21
Q. Have you discussed this case or the |\n| Q. Thank you, stop. Please, stop,
22 | 22 underlying Nevada case with anyone else other than |\n| 23 please. You are pausing. | 23 your attorneys? |\n| A. (In English ) I don't stop. I don't
24
25 stop. | 24
A. No.
25
Q. Is there anybody in the |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFileDd3/119/0254 Enteried:00118822113:569:86:2 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n21 (81 to 84)\n\n| | Conducted on April 1, 2021 |\n|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|\n| 81 | 83 |\n| Sherry-Netherland residence with you right now? | that our -- we are strategic partners.
1 |\n| 2 | 2 |\n| A. The hotel security and then also the | Q. How were you strategic partners? |\n| 3 | 3 |\n| cleaning people, cleaning team of the building. | A. Well, we are partners in having the |\n| 4 | common goal of eliminating the Chinese Communist |\n| Q. I'm assuming you have not discussed | 4 |\n| 5 | 5 |\n| this case with any of them, correct? | Party and telling the truth to the west. |\n| 6 | 6 |\n| A. Yes. That's correct. | Q. Sorry, do you have a formal business |\n| 7 | 7 |\n| Q. And I apologize for this question, but | relationship with Mr. Bannon? |\n| 8 | 8 |\n| do you have a girlfriend or boyfriend with whom | A. No. |\n| 9 | Q. Do you still communicate with |\n| you may have discussed this case? | 9 |\n| A.
No.
10 | 10 Mr. Bannon? |\n| 11 | MR. GAVENMAN: What possible |\n| Q. OK. Now, do you also -- it is my | 11 |\n| 12 understanding you also lived on a boat this | relevance does any of this have --
12 |\n| 13 summer? | A. Yes.
13 |\n| 14 | MR. GAVENMAN: This is so far afield |\n| A. Yes. | 14 |\n| Q. Did anybody live on the boat with you? | to anything relevant to this case. I've let |\n| । ર | ો ર |\n| A. Yeah, there were many. Like there are | a whole bunch of questions go here, but you |\n| 16 | 16 |\n| 17 eight or nine crews. | can't possibly tell me there is some reason
17 |\n| Q. Only crew members lived on the boat? | to ask these questions other than some |\n| 18 | 18 |\n| A. Well, there were guests, there were | harassing purpose. |\n| 19 | 19 |\n| 20 guests of the owner. So sometimes they were -- | If you have another purpose, we
20 |\n| 21 and they were there -- too. I don't know. | can discuss it, but there is no way this
21 |\n| 22 | 22 |\n| (Audio issue; reporter | is relevant to the case. |\n| 23 | 23 |\n| clarification) | Q. Are you still in communication with |\n| THE INTERPRETER: OK, I'm done.
24 | 24 Mr. Bannon? |\n| 25 | A. Yes, we are still in communication, |\n| Q. Who were these guests? | 25 |\n| 82 | 84 |\n| A. Well, I am not the owner of the boat. | 1 |\n| 1 | yes. |\n| So I can't -- I'm unable to answer that.
2 | 2
How are you in communication?
Q. |\n| 3
Q. Did Steve Bannon live on the boat this | 3
Phone calls.
A. |\n| 4 | 4 |\n| past summer? | Q. Do you call him or does he call you? |\n| 5 | 5 |\n| A. For a period of time. | MR. GAVENMAN: Unless you agree with |\n| 6 | the representation -- we can go off the |\n| Q. So you remember one person. Who else | 6 |\n| 7 | record -- how any of this is possibly |\n| can you now remember? | 7 |\n| A. Others. | 8 |\n| 8 | relevant? You are just harassing the |\n| Who were these others?
9
Q. | 9
witness. I will be happy to talk off line |\n| I don't recall.
10
A. | if there is any sort of basis why this is
10 |\n| 11 | relevant, OK, we can proceed. |\n| Q. Why are you able to now recall | 11 |\n| 12 Mr. Bannon and not the others? | But you are just harassing him
12 |\n| I don't recall.
A.
13 | for things that are completely
13 |\n| Q. Did you discuss your litigation with | irrelevant. You have been doing that |\n| 14 | 14 |\n| 15 Mr. Cheng with Mr. Bannon? | for most of the deposition. What
ો રે |\n| A. I don't recall. | does -- how he calls or doesn't call |\n| 16 | 16 |\n| 17 | Steve Bannon have anything to do with |\n| Q. If we were to ask Mr. Bannon, would he | 17 |\n| 18 have any information about your lawsuits with | this case? Come on.
18 |\n| 19 Mr. Cheng? | 19
MR. WOLMAN: Actually, you may not |\n| A.
I don't know.
20 | recall but your client testified that he
20 |\n| 21 | doesn't take phone calls. So now he just |\n| Q. What is your relationship with | 21 |\n| 22 Mr. Bannon? | did.
22 |\n| 23 | 23 |\n| A. Well, we had the common goal of | MR. GAVENMAN: He didn't testify that |\n| 24 eliminating the Chinese Communist Party and let | he doesn't take phone calls. He didn't
24 |\n| 25 the public know about the truth of the virus. And | testify that he doesn't take phone calls.
ટર |\n\n| Case 22:500730-000310291K PFiled 03/110/02/254Enteried:001129/22113:56:1863 df age 23 of | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| | |\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n22 (85 to 88)\n\n| ૪૨ | | 87 |\n|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----|\n| MR. WOLMAN: I'm exploring the prior | and also it is a kind of a threat to, | |\n| testimony.
2 | 2
like I said, the third-party who are | |\n| 3
MR. GAVENMAN: That's not what he | 3
irrelevant to this case such as my | |\n| said. That's not what he said and we are
4 | 4
children, my son, my daughter, my family | |\n| talking about Steve Bannon, his relationship
5 | 5
and my friend. | |\n| 6
with Steve Bannon. You are trying to find | You see a lot of such deposition
6 | |\n| out whether he takes phone calls? That's
7 | 7
information will be posted online | |\n| 8 the point of it? That's what you are doing? | 8
subsequently and posing great threat to | |\n| You can ask that question.
ರ | ರ
their safety and, in fact, that has been | |\n| But his relationship with Steve
10 | 10 done a lot by Cheng Shuiyan himself. | |\n| 11 Bannon and his partnership, things like | 11
So if afterward, any of this | |\n| 12 that -- that's what you have been | 12 information is going to be posted online | |\n| 13 asking, which is not about phone calls, | 13 about, for example, my clothes, my way | |\n| 14 you haven't made a representation why | 14 of life and then my family, my friends, | |\n| 15 this is relevant so if you want to ask a | 15 it's really a form of serious threat to | |\n| 16 question about phone calls, go right | 16 the safety of the irrelevant third-party | |\n| 17 ahead. But don't mischaracterizes | 17 to this case. | |\n| 18 testimony. And you can ask that | And I strongly request a phone
18 | |\n| 19 question. That's enough with Steve | 19 call to the judge to let him know or her | |\n| 20 Bannon. It this has no possible | 20 know that this is a threat to me and my | |\n| 21 relevance. | 21 friend. | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: I thought you said we
22 | And the thing also that you see,
22 | |\n| 23 weren't doing speaking objections. | 23 the questions surrounding my clothes, my | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: I said I would be
24 | 24 way of life, my wife, my son, my | |\n| 25 happy to go off the record. As I said that, | 25 daughter and Mr. Bannon, this is really | |\n| 86 | | 88 |\n| you went forward to not going off the | the circle of my life and this is the | |\n| 2 record. I responded to what you said. I | 2
map, the entire map of my life. And to | |\n| welcome going off the record?
3 | 3
my safety, if you can go online to | |\n| THE WITNESS: Hold on. We are --
4 | check, that is exactly the questions the
ব | |\n| 5
hang on. May I actually make a | line of information the CCP always
5 | |\n| recommendation, suggestion to my counsel,
6 | trying to describe and depict and
6 | |\n| 7
Jeff? | 7
collect. | |\n| 8
MR. GAVENMAN: OK. | 8
So with this line of questions, | |\n| THE WITNESS: Actually, I want to
ರ | 9 to me, it is a seriously exposing my | |\n| 10 tell you that I am seriously uncomfortable, | 10 person to great danger and great threat. | |\n| 11 uneasy because I feel like the questions | 11 That is why I feel like this kind of | |\n| 12 they are posing to me has not been relevant | 12 question, the line of question is | |\n| 13 to the case of Cheng Shuiyan and it is | 13 actually bearing malice and I wish to | |\n| 14 really that the questions were asked of me | 14 make this known to the judge and I wish | |\n| 15 were about my friends, my family, and it is | 15 my counsel would help me to contact the | |\n| 16 something that the Chinese Communist Party's | 16 judge and let them know that. | |\n| 17 line of questions. | MR. GAVENMAN: And I agree. And I
17 | |\n| So I am feeling uneasy and
18 | 18 think we have gone to the line of | |\n| 19 uncomfortable because I feel like it is | 19 harassment. Any questions about Bannon, it | |\n| 20 already posing threat to my own safety and | 20 is really not relevant, who is living on the | |\n| 21 the safety of my friends and family. | 21 boat, it's really not relevant. | |\n| Is it possible to actually even
22 | You represented to the judge we
22 | |\n| 23 call the judge about that to tell them | 23 would move on to the Nevada litigation. | |\n| 24 that I am very uneasy about that? | 24 If you don't, if you keep on this line | |\n| So it is a kind of abuse to me
25 | 25 of questioning, I will go to the judge | |\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:16:4 dPage 24 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n23 (89 to 92)\n\n| 89 | |\n|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|\n| | 91
I don't recall. |\n| and go right back to her.
1 | 1
A. |\n| 2
This is completely irrelevant. | 2
Q. Have you ever been employed in the |\n| 3
you know it. You told the junk we would | 3
United States? |\n| 4
go to the Nevada litigation, let's go to | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel,
4 |\n| 5
that please. | 5
Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question |\n| 6
MR. WOLMAN: Can the reporter read | invoking his rights under the Fifth
6 |\n| 7
back my last question. | 7
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. |\n| 8
(Record read) | 8
Q. Are you refusing to answer? |\n| 9
MR. WOLMAN: Thank you. | 0
Yes.
A. |\n| 10
Q. Mr. Kwok, do you call Mr. Bannon or | Q. You said you met Mr. Cheng once. When
10 |\n| 11 does he call you? | 11 was that? |\n| A. I don't recall.
12 | A. It will be around October 2017.
12 |\n| 13
Q. What device do you use for these | Q. And what were the circumstances of
13 |\n| 14 telephone calls? | 14 that meeting? |\n| A. I don't recall.
15 | A. So it was at the time that, in fact,
15 |\n| Q. Do you call him from the phone that
16 | 16 that there were a number of people also present |\n| 17 you showed us earlier? | 17 including his personal employee at the time, Lude |\n| 18
No.
A. | 18 Wang Ding Gang, and then other people name Yang |\n| 19
Q. What is your highest level of | 19 Jian Li and the Han Lian Chao. |\n| 20 education? | We all met in Washington DC at K
20 |\n| Middle school.
21
A. | 21 Hamlet Hotel and he wanted to -- wanted me to sign |\n| 22
Q. When was the last time you held a job? | 22 and to support his anti-Chinese Communist Party |\n| 23
I don't recall.
A. | 23 campaign and he told me that he respected my |\n| Q. What was your last paid employment
24 | 24 effort and that he showed his encouragement to my |\n| 25 job? | 25 anti-CCP activities and -- and then also he asked |\n| 90 | 92 |\n| 1
MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's | 1
me to sign a lot of newspapers. |\n| 2
counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | 2
Q. And after that meeting, did you have |\n| 3
question invoking his rights under the Fifth | 3
any direct communications with him after that? |\n| 4
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, and | 4
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. |\n| | |\n| 5
Mr. Wolman, we have established we are not | 5
A. No. |\n| 6
going to go any further with income | Q. Do you recall making a video about
6 |\n| 7
questions. So this -- | 7
Mr. Cheng? |\n| 8
MR. WOLMAN: Let me ask this one, let | A. I made a video on the 5th of June
8 |\n| 9
me ask this one. | 9 2018. |\n| 10
Q. What was the last job that you held | Q. And why did you make that video?
10 |\n| 11 that you won't invoke the Fifth Amendment | A. So it was in 2018, March and April,
11 |\n| 12 privilege for? | 12 Wang Ding Gang who is Cheng Shuiyan's employee and |\n| 13
MR. GAVENMAN: I need to object -- to | 13 together with Cheng Shuiyan they created a media |\n| 14
the extent you can answer that based not on | 14 called the Voice of Freedom. And then on YouTube, |\n| an attorney/client communication, you can
ો ર | 15 that they created a lot of the video supporting me |\n| answer.
16 | 16 and then also the corruptions of the Chinese |\n| To the extent it would reveal an
17 | 17 communist party. |\n| attorney/client communication that would
18 | However, by the end of March to
18 |\n| include your understanding of the Fifth
19 | 19 April, Wang Ding Gang told me that there was |\n| Amendment privilege, then please do not
20 | 20 someone from Bejing with a government background |\n| 21
answer revealing any attorney/client | 21 visiting Cheng Shuiyan and representing him |\n| 22
communications. | 22 expensive gifts such as expensive Moutai and then |\n| 23
A. I actually don't recall. | 23 telling him not to support me. And so not to |\n| 24
Q. What is the job you have held for the | 24 support me on the platform of Voice of Freedom. |\n| 25 longest period of time? | So is that he will -- Cheng
25 |\n\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
€'ƒ\"…†‡ˆ‰Šˆ‡‹ŒŽˆ''\"‰\"•ƒ–—‹˜ˆ\"'™šƒ›‡˜œ†Žœ†\"ƒ†‹\"žŸ† | Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36
Page 25 of |\n|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| 92 | WDRHFUDIGCBhXB^RHp^BP
uvwxyz{x } |\n| | rBH`NUCE`BHeGDIT7f8=87 |\n| | 6 |\n| | ! % !\"++%\"!\" |\n| | |\n| !\"# | \"! %\"!!!\" \" |\n| | |\n| \\$ %&'( | ++! % -\"%\"++%! |\n| | |\n| \" \"\"%%\")*+! | \" ++! %\"\" \"\"\"! |\n| | |\n| , -!-. | \"!\" \".+- |\n| | |\n| , ! +!\"! | \"\"\"\", !\"\" |\n| | |\n| \"\"\"\" ! !# | \"\"\"!,,>\"!!\" |\n| \\$ , !\"!\"-+!\" | \"\"\"!\"\"\"\"\"\"-# |\n| \".+- ,!\"%\" | \"+!\" |\n| -\"\"-\"# | \"/ \" #.!-\" 33.!-\" |\n| | |\n| / \"\"% | 33 |\n| | |\n| \"\"+, % , | ?@ABCDEFGBHFIJECBKLMNEFCIBH@OCDIPE |\n| | 78 |\n| \"!+-\"\"! | CQRC@ |\n| | |\n| +%.!-%\"0-# | SOIKNTCRHEBNFUDBFFCRTPV |\n| | 9 |\n| \\$ \"-\"\" | WXYZAWY[\\[YWY[]WQE^ICHEFFIF |\n| | 6 |\n| \",!\"\"\" ! | FRLIH_FBKECQIH_RH`UBNHFETIFRTFBFRLIH_ |\n| | : |\n| !%\"!!%\"\" | FBKECQIH_@
; |\n| \"+!-\"/1# | a[@bcdaeA]WQEDEIFHBMNEFCIBHf
< |\n| 2\"\"\"%, | CQEDEIFHBMNEFCIBH@
|\n| 33-\"++4+ | WXYZAWY[\\[YWY[]ZQRJEHgChIHIFQE` |\n| | 8= |\n| , \" !\" | QEFRI`@ |\n| | 7 |\n| - \"\"\"\"++!\"\" | \\$#i%\"\" !\" |\n| | |\n| !\"\"\" ! % | +!!\"-!\" .!- \"\" |\n| | |\n| !\" -!\"\"5!!+!\"\" | \"\"\"-%!\"\"-\"\"\" |\n| | |\n| ! \"!-33\"!- -\" | 0-\"\", \" |\n| | |\n| 9 | : |\n| \"\"!\"\",!\" +! | +!!%\"n0-\"\" ! |\n| | |\n| \"\"\" -!!\"# | \"\"-# \"\"*\"\" |\n| | |\n| / \"\"\"+\"\"\"\"\", | / # \"+!\"# |\n| | |\n| \"\"\"!-!j -\"!\" | ?@aD@oNBfGTERFEFCBG@ |\n| | 9 |\n| \"\"! \"\"\", # | \\$# 33 |\n| | |\n| , !+-/ \"\"!+ | ?@XEIFHBCRHF^EDIH_CQEMNEFCIBH@ABC |\n| | : |\n| - .!-# | DEFGBHFIJE@
; |\n| \\$ \"!-!\" | SOIKNTCRHEBNFUDBFFCRTPV
< |\n| +!!\"\"!*\"\"!\"\"\"\"- | WXYZAWY[\\[YWY[]cp@
|\n| +! -!!\" | eH`CQE^ICHEFFRTFBFRI`CQRC |\n| | 7= |\n| \"\"\"\"\"\"%5 - \"!\"\" | qEURNFEdN`ERH`aRDUBfCQEL^EDERTT |\n| | 7 |\n| \", -\"-! | rQEH_OQNILRHgFEKGTBLEEFFBCQRC^QRC |\n| | 8 |\n| -+!\"\",!\"%-!\" | QEFRI`URHqECDNFCE`@\\EDFBHRT |\n| | |\n| \"\" \"\"5\"\" # | EKGTBLEE@ |\n| | 9 |\n| ?@bQRC`I`LBN`BCBJEDIhLRHLCQIH_ | ?@bQRCEJI`EHUE`BLBNQRJECQRC |\n| 76 | 6 |\n| CQRCdN`ECBT`LBNk | aD@rQEH_`EhDRN`E`XBH_pBH_qNFIHEFFKEH7== |\n| : | : |\n| \\$# -!5 #l%!\" | KITTIBHLNRHk |\n| | ; |\n| %\"/ -\"% - | \\$# \"\"\"-33\"
|\n| \"!%\"\".!-+\"\"\"+\"\" | ! , n- |\n| !+-/ \"\"+\"!%%\" | , -\"-\"-\"\" |\n| | |\n| m! %1-m! %\"+!+!\"! | ! !\"\" |\n| | |\n| 33\", # | -\" \"% -!\"! \" |\n| | |\n| \\$ \"\"++\"\" | !%\"-!!, |\n| | |\n| \"!\"! !\"\"+!!%\" | ! +!\"! |\n| | |\n| | |\n\n\\deAYW~Y\\cO <<<@9--@-;:;bbb@\\deAYW~Y\\cO@rca\n\n, - \"st#\n\n!++!\"!, !\"\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g86.6 dPage 26 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n25 (97 to 100)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 97 | 99 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|\n| And in fact, his Hong Kong | that would be the cell phone that was hacked which |\n| partner also had in contact with me and giving me
2 | stored the documents of Cheng Shuiyan.
2 |\n| such documents as well and then all those
3 | 3
And also at the time, I had a |\n| 4
documents and the information I stored in the | Twitter account as well, and when that happened, I
4 |\n| computer and the cell phone before and which were
5 | 5
tweeted out and sending out messages that telling |\n| hacked and all been destroyed. Otherwise, I would
6 | my phone was hacked, the documents were hacked,
6 |\n| have them in my cell phone and my computer.
7 | and so the Twitter message and videos, I send the
7 |\n| 8
And in fact, including some kind | 8
message out. |\n| of bank documents and also his criminal record --
9 | 9
Q. When did you throw out these phones? |\n| 10 documents and records in mainland China and his | A. Around August or September 2018. I'm
10 |\n| 11 lawyer provided them to me and I have -- I had all | 11 not saying that I dispose all the phones within a |\n| 12 of them. | 12 day. Well, sometimes here, sometimes there. |\n| Q. OK, what was the name of this lawyer?
13 | 13 Sometimes -- hang on. |\n| A. And I don't recall it now.
14 | So that I sometimes this day,
14 |\n| Q. What was the name of this Hong Kong
1 ર | 15 sometimes later, sometimes earlier, it's because |\n| 16 business partner? | 16 those cell phones, once they were hacked -- |\n| A. I don't recall that now either.
17 | 17 sometimes they were just being hacked, but |\n| Q. When did this alleged hack take place?
18 | 18 sometimes the entire phone was on fire. |\n| A. It was after Cheng Shuiyan and his
19 | So to keep all these phones here would
19 |\n| 20 employee, personal employee, Marco, made the | 20 really be like threatening so that's why I just |\n| 21 attack on me on the platform Geteer, and since | 21 disposed of them. |\n| 22 then, my cell phone was hacked daily. In fact, | Q. I'm a little confused because isn't it
22 |\n| 23 really daily. | 23 true that the HBO piece aired on November 15, |\n| In fact, it was from May 2018 and August
24 | 24 2017, months before the video of May 2018 -- |\n| 25 2018, Cheng Shuiyan and his personal employee, | 25 sorry, June 2018? |\n| | |\n| | |\n| 98 | 100 |\n| 1 Marco, being -- attacking me and because of that | A. So what -- maybe there is some mistake
1 |\n| 2 attack and I changed my cell phone was hacked either | and I did not say that the cell phone was hacked
2 |\n| every day or every other two days. So basically at
ను | in those cell phone displayed in the HBO
3 |\n| that time, I need to change cell phone nearly every
4 | interview.
ব |\n| 5
day. | 5
I merely said that during that |\n| б
Q. And the documents were on this cell | interview, I have displayed the cell phones that
6 |\n| 7
phone and the computer, you say? | have -- so many of the cell phones being hacked.
7 |\n| 8
A. Yes, it was on that cell phone. | So I was just saying that my cell phone
8 |\n| Q. And where is that cell phone now?
9 | 9 was already hacked during that time, but the peak of |\n| 10
A. All thrown away. Because I could not | 10 the hacker was happening in 2018 between May and |\n| 11 open them anymore and I could not use them | 11 August. |\n| 12 anymore. | Q. OK. And you say you probably disposed
12 |\n| Q. And where is that computer now?
13 | 13 of the phone that had the documents regarding |\n| 14
A. I did not use computer. I was | 14 Mr. Cheng at some point in August or September of |\n| 15 actually just using cell phone. I was talking | 15 2018, correct? |\n| 16 about just cell phone. | Yes.
16
A. |\n| Q. How did these documents get to your
17 | Q.
And at what point --
17 |\n| 18 cell phone? | A. Let me think, let me think.
18 |\n| A. At the time, it was through WhatsApp
19 | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, do you
19 |\n| 20 and MSN Messenger. | mind if I clarify with the witness one word
20 |\n| 21
In fact, that HBO had made an | that I'm not quite sure I caught?
21 |\n| 22 interview, had interviewed me, and then during | MR. WOLMAN: Sure.
22 |\n| 23 that interview is -- you can check on those | 23
A. So the thing is that you see, even |\n| 24 videos, during that interview, I placed on the | 24 though those documents were destroyed, however, a |\n\nCase 22:5007:20 - DoOSIO231K PFiled 03/11/02/22113:56:18 7 dPage 27 of\n\nರಿನ\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n26 (101 to 104)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021 101 103 1 to the network, on the Geteer platform. So if you 1 A. I don't have any recollection. 2 were to make a such, you can find those documents. 2 Q. Who told you to dispose of the phones? 3 3 Q. When was it you first decided to sue A. Myself. 4 4 Mr. Cheng? Q. Did anybody ever tell you not to 5 5 dispose of phones? A. So I really cannot quite recall from 6 I don't recall. 6 June, July, August, you know, during that period A. 7 Q. Do you have any awareness of an 7 of time, he made serious attacks towards myself 8 and my family, full of malice and including he 8 obligation to preserve documents in anticipation 9 9 himself, his employee, Marco, every day just of litigation? 10 incessantly just creating attack towards me. It 10 MR. GAVENMAN: Objection. 11 has brought so much harm and so much destruction 11 To the extent you can answer that 12 to my life and my family. 12 without it being based on 13 So I really cannot recall exactly when 13 attorney/client communication, you're 14 14 that I decide to sue him, perhaps in May or August, welcome to answer it, but please don't 15 around that time. 1 ર reveal attorney/client communications. 16 16 Q. When did you hire attorney Christopher A. My answer is no. 17 Rose and/or the law firm of Jolley, Urga, 17 Q. Is there any reason nothing about your 18 Woodbury, Holthus & Rose? 18 video or these documents were mentioned in your 19 A. So I must also clarify that, you know, 19 August 9, 2018 complaint against Mr. Cheng in 20 Nevada? 20 I actually don't remember the names, the names of 21 the counsel or the names of the firm. All these 21 MR. GAVENMAN: Again, I strongly 22 names that you just talked about, I have no 22 caution you not to reveal any 23 concept whatsoever. 23 attorney/client communications. 24 24 But do you mind if I go to the To the extent any understanding 25 bathroom? 25 comes from attorney/client 102 104 1 1 Q. That's fine. communications, you should not reveal 2 2 Wait, strike that, let's answer them. 3 3 the question. When did you hire the law firm that To the extent you can answer it 4 filed the Nevada suit? 4 without revealing, you can. 5 A. I cannot recall the specific time. 5 A. No. 6 Q. OK, we can take a five-minute bathroom 6 Q. You mentioned the use of MSN 7 break. Messenger. What is the Microsoft account 7 8 (Recess; 2:31 p.m. to 2:40 p.m.) 8 affiliated with that? 9 9 Q. Mr. Guo, do you ever attempt to MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. 10 recover the data from any of these phones you 10 A. Well, I have over a hundred of a cell 11 claim were hacked? 11 phone. I really cannot recall any of those. A. Well, it was never recovered 12 12 Q. Are you aware that --13 successfully. 13 A. So when I'm talking about hundreds of 14 Who attempted to recover it? 14 cell phone I use, that would be the situation to Q. I don't recall. 15 15 the period of August of 2018. In fact, I would A. 16 Q. Did you ever submit what -- these one 16 have much more of the cell phone use after August 17 2018. 17 or more phones to a professional forensic company 18 for recovery? 18 Q. How is it possible that you had an MSN 19 A. I don't recall. 19 messenger account without having an e-mail Q. Did your Nevada attorneys assist you 20 address? 20 21 in attempting to get any data recovery from this 21 MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form, 22 device or devices? foundation. 22 23 A. I don't recall. 23 A. Well, I only know when I have a cell 24 Q. Well, what do you recall about the 24 phone, then there is a cell phone number so that 25 recovery efforts for the data on the phones? 25 would be MSN, this function that I can use. I\n\n### Case 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g888 dPage 28 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n27 (105 to 108)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| | 105
107 |\n|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|\n| don't know that MSN is having any connection with
1 | electronic copy of the original complaint filed in |\n| 2
e-mail. | Nevada by you against Mr. Cheng on August 9, 2018.
2 |\n| Q. Who sets up your cell phone each time
3 | 3
We can scroll through it. |\n| 4
you get one? | 4
Did you read this document either |\n| 5
I don't recall.
A. | 5
in English or as translated before it was filed? |\n| 6
Q. Can you recall anybody who has ever | A. Asimple translation, yes, someone had
6 |\n| helped you set up a cell phone?
7 | briefly translated that for me.
7 |\n| 8
I don't recall.
A. | Q. Who translated it?
8 |\n| 9
Q. You have an Apple iPhone there? | 0
I cannot recall.
A. |\n| Yes.
10
A. | Q. Were they affiliated with the Nevada
10 |\n| Q. What is the Apple ID associated with
11 | 11 law firm, who translated it? |\n| 12 that iPhone? | I don't know.
12
A. |\n| I don't know.
A.
13 | Q. How did you make the acquaintance of
13 |\n| Q. You just got that a few days ago,
14 | 14 this translator? |\n| 15 correct? | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection, form,
ો ર |\n| A. Yes.
16 | foundation.
16 |\n| Q. Do you still have it in front of you | A. Well, I don't know this translator.
17 |\n| 17 | |\n| 18 or with you in the room? | Q. Now, paragraph 101 on page 13 states,
18 |\n| A. No, it's in another room.
19 | 19 \"Cheng does not know Guo personally.\" |\n| Q. OK. We have had a few breaks so far.
20 | You testified, however, that the
20 |\n| 21 Did you speak with anybody during those breaks? | 21 two of you had met back months before this |\n| A.
No.
22 | 22 complaint was filed, correct? |\n| Q. Have you sent any communications with
23 | A. You have misunderstood because what it
23 |\n| 24 anybody during any of the breaks that we have had | 24 says here, Cheng does not know Guo personally |\n| 25 today? | 25 meant before, long before we met personally, long |\n| | 108
106 |\n| 1
No.
A. | 1 before that he accused me of being rapist and |\n| 2
Q. Did you read the Nevada complaint | 2 killers, I had to -- this millions and millions of |\n| before it was filed?
3 | dollars of deal with Xi Jinping and betraying the
3 |\n| 4
And actually strike that. I'm | 1.4 billion of Chinese people, we did not know
ব |\n| 5
going to upload a document. | each other.
5 |\n| 6
MR. WOLMAN: It should be going. | 6
So I emphasized that before he |\n| 7
TECHNICIAN: Make sure you hit -- | maliciously insulted me, threatening me, harming
7 |\n| 8
MR. WOLMAN: I did. | 8 me and before we met each other, we -- did he not |\n| TECHNICIAN: OK. Some people miss
9 | 9 know me. |\n| 10
that. | Q. I am sorry, when did my client call
10 |\n| 11
MR. WOLMAN: The progress bar is not | 11 you a rapist? |\n| 12
moving for some reason. | A. Let me see, he started to have his
12 |\n| THE INTERPRETER: I was explaining to
13 | 13 personal employee Marco in March and then started |\n| the witness that we are waiting for the
14 | 14 out from April, May and June, all the way to |\n| document upload.
ો રે | 15 August, they started to maliciously viciously |\n| MR. WOLMAN: I just uploaded to the
16 | 16 attacking me verbally and him, himself and his |\n| Zoom. Can you use that?
17 | 17 personal employee, Marco, and kept calling me on |\n| 18
TECHNICIAN: Yes, absolutely. One | |\n| | 18 their platform that I was the rapist, I was, you |\n| 19
moment, please. | 19 know, a peasant, I was a liar, I was whatever and |\n| Q. I am marking as Exhibit 3 and
20 | 20 he -- they were making such threat to me and the |\n| 21 displaying the document on the screen. | 21 safe -- threatening my safety and my family's |\n| (Exhibit 3, document entitled
22 | 22 safety and we were constantly living in -- under |\n| \"Complaint\" marked for identification,
23 | 23 this kind of a threat and fear. |\n| as of this date.)
24 | Q. Move to strike, not responsive.
24 |\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoOSIOZ31KPFileDd3/119/02/113756086113:56:18 0 0 f\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n28 (109 to 112)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 109
rapist? | 111
A. So I actually cannot be sure that it |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| A. Well, the thing is that he and his
2 | was Ria Ma who was actually suing me for that.
2 |\n| employee, Marco, and all the time that on -- | 3 |\n| | You see, this case was brought
ব |\n| 4 saying that on Freedom China or Twitter, calling
5 me that liar. But I cannot recall exactly when | forward right after I had made the broadcasting, |\n| | 5 the whistleblower broadcasting in 2017, and then |\n| 6 that Cheng Shuiyan have called me that, and he and | 6 on the same day, the notice from the Interpol had |\n| 7 his personal employee definitely did call me that | 7 been issued for me, for me, my person, and then |\n| 8 starting from May or -- they did. | 8 after that, this case was brought up. |\n| Q. So you are saying --
த | But the thing is, throughout this
0 |\n| A. He did. He did, I have -- I haven't
10 | 10 case, I have not seen Ria Ma or the documents or |\n| 11 finished, sorry, Counsel. | 11 the information was brought forward by the police |\n| Well, and --
12 | 12 in mainland China. Ria Ma had never appeared or |\n| 13
(Simultaneous crosstalk) | 13 never shown in any way. |\n| Q. First of all, I don't need that
14 | So I believe that this is a
14 |\n| 15 translated. | 15 fabricated case and brought forward by the Chinese |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: You are going to have
16 | 16 Communist Party police and that is why Cheng |\n| that translated. He is going to respond.
17 | 17 Shuiyan was so very familiar with this case. |\n| 18
MR. WOLMAN: He is not responding to | But Ria Ma has never appeared and
18 |\n| 19
anything. | 19 in fact, we have been trying to look for her and |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: He most certainly is.
20 | 20 trying to get her to be the witness for this case |\n| MR. WOLMAN: He is filibustering, he
21 | 21 but she has never shown. |\n| 22
is filibustering. | Q. That case is still ongoing, correct?
22 |\n| A. I have a -- I have answered you, so
23 | A. Yes. We -- I should say that we are
23 |\n| 24 that you must let me translate that. And so --
25 and because I have answered your question. | 24 in the middle of looking for Ria Ma and we have
25 been looking for her for many months. |\n| 110 | 112 |\n| By the end of March and in June | Q. To be clear, has anybody else accused |\n| and May and April, his lawyer, from Yingnan had | you of sexual assault? |\n| 3 been -- had been calling and telling me that Cheng | THE INTERPRETER: Sorry, I hear two
3 |\n| 4 Shuiyan had been already accusing me of being a | voices just now.
4 |\n| spy, a rapist and all that.
ട് | 5
Q. To be clear, has anybody other than |\n| And also including Lude and he
6 | Ria Ma accused you of sexual assault?
6 |\n| 7 privately told me that Cheng Shuiyan personally | 7
A. No. |\n| 8 privately calling me rapist and liar and then also | 8
(Simultaneous crosstalk) |\n| 9 like threatening and just, you know, in fact, it's | の
Q. As to -- there is no question posed. |\n| 10 on social media as well. | 10 There is no question posed. |\n| And then he actually naturally privately
11 | A. That is -- that is why the -- I need
11 |\n| 12 make the allegation of me being a rapist openly. In | 12 to sue Cheng Shuiyan because why would he know |\n| 13 fact, he also said that I was a rapist and I needed | 13 that there was such a case, and then for bringing |\n| 14 to be deported and he tweeted that, too. | 14 forward this case and then brought up this case is |\n| 15
And on the Twitter, he claimed | 15 completely full of malice and vicious -- |\n| 16 that he had written to DOJ and his personal | 16 viciousness and then trying to insult me, trying |\n| 17 employee, Marco, also written to the DOJ that I | |\n| | 17 to frame me and then it was trying to threaten me |\n| 18 was a rapist and needed to be deported, and so the | 18 and ruin me. |\n| 19 Chinese government can, you know, just take care | Q. And none of those allegations appear
19 |\n| 20 of me and it was all done privately and openly as | 20 though in Exhibit 3, do they? |\n| 21 well. | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection, form.
21 |\n| Q. Since you seem to have opened the
22 | A. That is why I need to, again,
22 |\n| 23 door, were you sued for sexual assault? | 23 emphasize to you -- that is why I need to clarify |\n| 24
Yes.
A. | 24 with you when you're talking about Exhibit 3, you |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/129122113:56:1860 dPage 30 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n29 (113 to 116)\n\n| 113
understand English, I cannot read English. | 115
that in March, Cheng Shuiyan met with someone from |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2
Well, that is, that is why that I | mainland China and he was actually a Mongolian
2 |\n| 3
need to tell you that, because a lot of the | 3
police. |\n| evidence that had not been appeared on this, in
ব | So he was drinking Moutai alcohol
4 |\n| 5 this complaint and also that had not been brought | 5
with this person and given hundred million -- |\n| 6 forward in the case of Nevada's lawsuit and that | millions of dollars by this person and just so
6 |\n| 7 is exactly why that they have -- there were two | 7
that he can defame me and insult me. |\n| 8 lethal fatal made for that case and as a result, | 8
All of that was actually recorded |\n| we lost that lawsuit.
d | 9 and told by Lude and these are fact, factual as |\n| One is that Lude was -- Lude was
10 | 10 just a piece of steel metal, and the only person |\n| 11 and that's Wang Ding Gang, and also Marco, who was | 11 who would think that I am the enemy and I am a bad |\n| 12 the personal employee of Cheng Shuiyan, they made | 12 person is the Chinese Communist Party. they are |\n| 13 this defamation insult of me and that was because | 13 the only people who would consider me as enemy or |\n| 14 they were instructed and told by Cheng Shuiyan. | 14 people working with them would consider me an |\n| 15 And so Cheng Shuiyan would need to be responsible | 15 enemy. |\n| 16 for all the attacks and the insult and defamed | So I can tell you I know that
16 |\n| 17 remarks that they have made of me, and that has | 17 that Cheng Shuiyan was very wealthy, but the thing |\n| 18 not been included in this case as the evidence. | 18 is that the money that he got came from defrauding |\n| And also including quite a lot of
19 | 19 people in China and being defrauding his business |\n| 20 information including in the cell phone and being | 20 partner in China and coming from ill-gotten means. |\n| 21 lost and all that, I had not been included in any | Q. And this information you got from a
21 |\n| 22 of this complaint. And that is why that we have | 22 person named Lude who was losing his job, correct? |\n| 23 lost it. And why that we have used a new lawyer | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
23 |\n| 24 and to open this case again. | A. OK. So Lude did not lose his job.
24 |\n| And that also includes the fact
25 | 25 Lude gave up his job because he did not want to be |\n| | |\n| | |\n| 114 | 116 |\n| that we have only -- I have only 15,000 of the | conspired with the CCP. |\n| damage from him. It is a very low amount.
N | And since that he gave up his job
2 |\n| 3
The reason that we only sought
ব | 3
with Cheng Shuiyan, his life is even better. He
4 |\n| such a low amount is because it was only to try to | was doing so much better with his anti-Chinese |\n| 5 stop him, stop him from making -- continue of | 5
Communist Party activities. |\n| 6 making malicious insult and vicious rumor that is
7 very destructive to me and my family and also | And also I must clarify, the
6
information did not come from Lude. As I stated,
7 |\n| 8 spreading all this deception online about me and | 8 the information come from Cheng Shuiyan -- the |\n| 9 created by him and his personal employee, Marco, | |\n| 10 and proven by his conversations together with | 9 lawyer from -- the Yingnan lawyer who is also the
10 Mongolian police, the intelligence police, and |\n| 11 Lude. | 11 also that the -- to the Mongolian police |\n| And all of that had not been included
12 | 12 interviews of those people that who had been |\n| 13 into that complaint made to the Nevada case and that | 13 disappeared, who had been arrested after they were |\n| 14 is why that we are pursuing that. | 14 supportive of me and they were arrested by those |\n| We hope that with this
15 | 15 police, it come from those people as a source. |\n| 16 opportunity that we can provide more fact to the | 16 Not from Lude. |\n| 17 judge and then for this case and so that we can | Q. And other than Lude, you don't have
17 |\n| 18 know that Cheng Shuiyan was in cohort with the CCP | 18 the names today remembering any of these other |\n| 19 and conspired with them and spreading destructive | 19 sources, do you? |\n| 20 insult of me and creating malicious rumors about | A. If you wish to search for those names
20 |\n| 21 me that is very destructive. | 21 and, you know, if you have time, those names were |\n| Q. Do you have any -- excuse me, my turn.
22 | 22 online and you can actually find them. |\n| Do you have any actual evidence
23 | Can you find them?
23
Q. |\n| 24 that my client is working with the CCP? | I can try.
24
A. |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/10/02/254Enteried003/113:56:161 dPage 31 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n30 (117 to 120)\n\n| 117 | 119 |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| your counsel to supplement the initial
2
disclosures? | repeat the interpreting?
l
2
MR. WOLMAN: Yes. |\n| 3 | 3
A. I borrowed from them. |\n| A. I cannot guarantee but I will try. | |\n| Q. When do you think you can get us that | Q. Is there an agreement memorializing |\n| 4 | 4 |\n| information by? | 5 |\n| 5 | this borrowing? |\n| A. I cannot guarantee. As I said, I
6 | 6
No.
A. |\n| 7 | 7 |\n| cannot promise. So I cannot tell you what -- | Q. Do you have to pay them back? |\n| 8 | 8 |\n| when. | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel, |\n| 9 | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question |\n| Q. Now, if you wanted to, you could have | ರ |\n| 10 any of your legal pleadings translated for you, | invoking his rights under the Fifth
10 |\n| 11 correct? | 11
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. |\n| A. You mean by whom? | Q. How much did you borrow? |\n| 12 | 12 |\n| 13 | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel, |\n| Q. Did you have a certified translator | 13 |\n| 14 translate any legal pleading for you? | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question
14 |\n| A. Our lawyer was doing a fine job. | invoking his rights under the Fifth |\n| 15 | ો ર |\n| Q. How did you know your lawyer was doing | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. |\n| 16 | 16 |\n| 17 a find job only now to find out there was | Q. Was there a term of interest in this
17 |\n| 18 information not included? | 18 borrowing arrangement? |\n| A. So my -- what I meant was that usually | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. |\n| 19 | 19 |\n| 20 lawyer would do a good job. It's just of course | Foundation
20 |\n| 21 that lawyer, that particular lawyer did not do a | Yes.
A.
21 |\n| 22 good job. But usually lawyers can be relied upon. | O. How much was the rate of interest?
22 |\n| Q. If you wanted to, you could have | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel, |\n| 23 | 23 |\n| 24 anything translated, correct? | Mr. Guo declines to answer the question
24 |\n| Of course.
25
A. | invoking his rights under the Fifth
25 |\n| 118 | 120 |\n| Q. Who paid for the litigation in Nevada? | 1 |\n| 1 | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. |\n| 2
Golden Spring.
A. | 2
Q. Did Golden Spring New York -- strike |\n| 3
Why?
Q. | 3
that. |\n| 4 | If you had won your case against |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Wait. On the advice | 4 |\n| 5 | Mr. Cheng in Nevada, would Golden Spring New York |\n| of Mr. Guo's counsel, Mr. Guo declines to | റ |\n| 6 | have been entitled to any portion of that |\n| respond to the question invoking his rights | 6 |\n| 7 | 7 |\n| under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. | recovery? |\n| Constitution. | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel, |\n| 8 | 8 |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Jeff, that's not an | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question |\n| ರ | ರ |\n| asset-related question. That is a | invoking his rights under the Fifth |\n| 10 | 10 |\n| 11 | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. |\n| motivation. | 11 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: We are invoking the | Q. Have you borrowed from Golden Spring |\n| 12 | 12 |\n| Fifth. We have already been through this.
13 | 13 New York to finance any other litigation? |\n| We had 20 questions about why they pay for | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel, |\n| 14 | 14 |\n| stuff. I don't know why you would think | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question |\n| ો ર | ો ર |\n| there would be a different answer here. | invoking his rights under the Fifth |\n| 16 | 16 |\n| THE WITNESS: Counsel, I just need to | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. |\n| 17 | 17 |\n| go to close my window because the window is | Q. Subsequent to your disappointment with |\n| 18 | 18 |\n| open at the moment. There is a gust of
19 | 19 the prior Nevada law firm, have you done anything |\n| wind. So I need to close the window. Is it
20 | 20 to ensure that all documents in your litigation |\n| all right if I go to do that?
21 | 21 with Mr. Cheng are translated for you? |\n| 22 | A. No. |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Sure. | 22 |\n| Q. Did you ask Golden Spring to pay for | 23 |\n| 23 | MR. WOLMAN: Let's, Juliet, let's |\n| | |\n| | |\n| 24 the Nevada litigation?
25
THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, may I | take out document number 003.
24
TECHNICIAN: Yes, marking as Exhibit
25 |\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoOSIOZ31KPFileDd3/119/02/113722113:56:16:2 dPage 32 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n31 (121 to 124)\n\n| 121
4. And the document is on the screen.
1
identification, as of this date.)
2
2
(Exhibit 4, Complaint and Jury
Q. Mr. Guo, I will note these are the
3
Demand marked for identification, as of
initial disclosures filed by -- served by your
3
4
4
attorney in this case.
this date.)
5
5
Did you ever have this document
Q. Mr. Guo, I will represent that this is
6
the complaint and jury demand in this case.
6
translated?
7
7
Did you have it translated for
A. The thing is that -- allow me to
8
you?
8
emphasize again, like this is an English document,
9
A. At the time that I had a voice
9 and you know, if you ask me any of the English
10 simultaneous interpretation of this document for
10 documents just posted in front of me on the screen
11 and to scroll down and let me see, I really cannot
11 me, a brief interpretation, but I do not recall
12 there was translation.
12 be sure that whether I have seen it or not or | 123 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Let's pull up the
13 translated the document or not. I really cannot
13 | |\n| document that starts with 004.
14 be sure.
14 | |\n| TECHNICIAN: Marking as Exhibit 5.,
Now, if you were to give me time and put
15
] ર | |\n| 16 the document in front of me and let me really read
and the document is on the screen.
16 | |\n| (Exhibit 5, Defendant Wengui
17 in detail and try to remember, perhaps I can. But
17 | |\n| Guo's Answer to the Complaint marked for
18 just post in front of me scrolling, I just cannot be
18 | |\n| identification, as of this date.)
19
19 sure. | |\n| Q. I would represent this is the answer
MR. WOLMAN: OK. Let's go to 006. I
20
20 | |\n| 21 to the complaint filed by Mr. Gavenman in this
know I'm jumping around Juliet, sorry.
21 | |\n| TECHNICIAN: No problem at all.
22 case.
22 | |\n| 23
Did you have this document translated
Marking it as Exhibit 7 and
23 | |\n| 24 for you?
Exhibit 7 is on the screen.
24 | |\n| A.
Yes.
(Exhibit 7, Defendant Wengui
25
25 | |\n| 122 | 124 |\n| Q. If you did not have the prior
1
Guo's Objections and Responses to | |\n| 2
2
document, which was Exhibit 4, fully translated,
Plaintiff Logan Cheng's Second Revised | |\n| 3
3
how were you able to assist in advising your
First Set of Requests for Production of | |\n| company whether or not to admit or deny certain
4
4
Documents marked for identification, as | |\n| 5
5
of this date.)
facts? | |\n| 6
Q. This is a -- the document is a 24-page
MR. GAVENMAN: I caution you not to
6 | |\n| 7
7
reveal any attorney/client communications in
document that is a your responses to our second | |\n| 8
this answer. To the extent you can answer
revised first set of requests for production.
8 | |\n| without revealing them, you are free do so.
As the technician scrolls through
9
ರ | |\n| A. I must clarify. You know the document
10
10 it, you will see there are over a 100 document | |\n| 11 requests, of these numbered, many of which have
11 that you showed me previously, I actually cannot | |\n| 12 be sure whether there were any words of
12 since been omitted. | |\n| 13 translation. There may have, there may not have.
Do you recall seeing a translated
13 | |\n| 14 version of that, of any document with over 100
14 I just cannot be sure. | |\n| And including this one also. I
15 requests?
15 | |\n| 16 mean, that -- I may have seen it but I may not
A. Yes, I recall.
16 | |\n| 17 have either.
17
And did you have that translated for
Q. | |\n| So any of these documents in English, I
18 you?
18 | |\n| 19 just wouldn't know for sure.
That I cannot recall.
19
A. | |\n| Q. OK. Now let's go to number 005.
Q. So then let's go to 008.
20
20 | |\n| 21
TECHNICIAN: OK. The document has
(Exhibit 8, Defendant Wengui
21 | |\n| been marked as Exhibit 6 and is displaying
22
Guo's Objections and Answers to
22 | |\n| Plaintiff Logan Cheng's First Set of
the document on the screen.
23
23 | |\n| (Exhibit 6, Defendant Wengui
Interrogatories marked for
24
24 | |\n| Guo's Initial Disclosures marked for
25
identification, as of this date.)
ટર્ર | |\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g863 dPage 33 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n32 (125 to 128)\n\n| ો ટર્સ | | 127 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|\n| Q. These are your Answers to the Revised | Let's not go into medical records. There
1 | |\n| First Set of Interrogatories. Why don't we scroll
2 | 2
was a request for that, we objected to it | |\n| 3
through that to the bottom. | 3
and moved for a protective order on medical | |\n| 4
Moving back to page 5, is that | 4
issues. We can -- you are very on the | |\n| 5
your signature? | 5
boarder. | |\n| A. Now -- yes, this is my signature, but
6 | 6
MR. WOLMAN: That was before I found | |\n| I must clarify, right, I mean, I cannot recall --
7 | 7
out your client doesn't know where he was | |\n| 8 I cannot be sure whether there are translation -- | 8
last week to sign this. | |\n| 9 meaning a written translation document for me. | 9
MR. GAVENMAN: OK, do you have -- | |\n| But definitely verbal interpretation of
10 | what his care is or isn't is really not
10 | |\n| 11 these documents was provided by my counsel to me. | relevant. He doesn't remember where it was.
11 | |\n| Q. Do you understand that you signed that
12 | It's really where it should begin and end.
12 | |\n| 13 under penalty of perjury? | 13
Q. Are you refusing to answer the | |\n| A. Of course.
14 | 14 question? | |\n| । ર
Q. Are you certain that you understood | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, I don't
ાં ર | |\n| 16 the translations of your answers as appearing in | believe I finished the interpreting of that
16 | |\n| 17 this document? | question. Can you repeat that question for
17 | |\n| 18
Yes.
A. | 18
me. | |\n| Q. Where were you when you signed this
19 | Q. Sure. Has any physician diagnosed you
19 | |\n| 20 document? | 20 with a memory condition? | |\n| A.
I cannot recall.
21 | No.
21
A. | |\n| This was last week, correct?
22
0. | Q. Turning back to the last exhibit which
22 | |\n| I cannot recall.
23
A. | 23 was 00 -- which is Kwok 7, what did you do to | |\n| Q. Do you see the date, March 24, 2021?
24 | 24 search for responsive documents? | |\n| A. So it should be on, you know,
25 | A. Our lawyers have made the search for
25 | |\n| | | |\n| | | |\n| 126 | | 128 |\n| March 24, right?
1 | documents.
1 | |\n| 2
Q.
Yes. | 2
Q. Where do you store your documents? | |\n| 3
In that case, it's March 24.
A. | 3
A. I did not store or kept any document. | |\n| 4
Q. And you don't remember where you were | Q. Did you provide your lawyers with any
4 | |\n| 5
last week when you signed this? | 5
of your phones or other computer devices? | |\n| 6
I really don't recall.
A. | 6
I don't have computer.
A. | |\n| 7
Q. Earlier in this deposition, I asked | 7
Q. What is the device you are currently | |\n| you if you had any medical conditions that would
8 | 8 using to stream this deposition? | |\n| 9 prevent you from answering the questions | d
A. Acell phone. | |\n| 10 accurately. | Q. Is that a cell phone different from
10 | |\n| 11
Do you have some sort of medical | 11 the one you showed us before? | |\n| 12 condition that affects your memory? | 12
A. No, in front of me is actually a -- | |\n| A. I recall that.
13 | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, do you
13 | |\n| Q. Then why is it you are unable to
14 | mind if I clarify the term with the witness?
14 | |\n| 15 recall where you were last week to sign this | MR. WOLMAN: Sure.
ાં ર | |\n| 16 document? | A. So in front much me, it is a video
16 | |\n| 17
A. I don't know. | 17 playing device. | |\n| Q. Are you currently under the care of a
18 | Q. What kind of device is it?
18 | |\n| 19 neurologist? | A. I don't understand. Because you see
19 | |\n| A.
No.
20 | 20 they were in English writing -- they -- there was | |\n| Q. Has any physician told you you had a
21 | 21 an English writing, so I don't really know. | |\n| 22 problem with your memory? | 22
Q. Is it a computer? | |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: We are getting on the
23 | A. No, it is an image video device or
23 | |\n| borderline of harassing. He just doesn't
24
25 remember where the document was signed. | 24 something called image pick-up device, something
25 like that. | |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:164 dPage 34 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n33 (129 to 132)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 129 | 131 |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Q. How is it connected to the internet? | lawsuit in Nevada, we were full of good faith, |\n| 2
A. Because it is a photo imaging device, | only asking for a very minor amount, 15,000 |\n| 3
so that it can be connected with the internet. | dollars. The purpose of it merely to stop him |\n| 4
Q. Is it connected through some form of | attacking us, stop him spreading malicious vicious
4 |\n| 5
wifi? | 5
rumor that has cost severe destruction to myself |\n| 6
A. It has wifi and it has cabling wire | and my family.
6 |\n| 7
function as well. | 7
And it caused great fear in my |\n| 8
Q. And it doesn't connect -- does it | 8 family's mind because imagine that they were told |\n| 9
connect in any way to a computer? | 9 that they will be deported back into China, in the |\n| 10
A. I don't really know because it has a | 10 hand -- put in the hand of the Chinese Communist |\n| 11 box. It's called a live broadcasting box because | 11 Party and put into prison by the Chinese Communist |\n| 12 I broadcast with myself anywhere. So that's why | 12 Party and then Cheng Shuiyan and his personal |\n| 13 this is a portable device and it has a live | 13 employee, Marco, came right to the Department of |\n| 14 broadcasting box. So I don't know whether it's | 14 Justice and request us to be deported. And that |\n| 15 connecting -- can be connected with computer or | 15 is the kind of fear and that kind of scary |\n| 16 not. | 16 accusation that is spread on us. |\n| Q. Where do you store your records?
17 | So that is full of malicious and
17 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
18 | 18 vicious intention, and we, in return, we were just |\n| A. Well, I don't have anywhere that I can
19 | 19 like asking for 15,000 of the damage just to stop |\n| 20 keep any records because unlike Cheng Shuiyan, | 20 him for spreading that kind of a rumor about us |\n| 21 every day, I was trying to run away from, escape | 21 and in good faith. |\n| 22 from the persecution coming from the CCP, and I am | Q. One -- please, let sir, sir. What do
22 |\n| 23 not as wealthy as Cheng Shuiyan who has hotel and | 23 you mean by \"we\"? |\n| 24 who has properties, you know, and every day, I'm | 24
A. I only said I. Perhaps it is the |\n| 25 just running around. And I don't really have any | 25 interpreter who interpreted it into \"we,\" but I |\n| | |\n| | |\n| 130 | 132 |\n| place that I can keep that record. | only say \"I.\" |\n| 2
Q. When you say you're not as wealthy -- | 2
Q. OK. Now, are you aware that you |\n| 3
excuse me, when you say you're not as wealthy as | 3
actually asked for monies in excess of 50,000
dollars on the face of the second amended
র্ব |\n| 4
my client, how do you know that?
MR. GAVENMAN: To the extent there is | |\n| 5 | 5
complaint? |\n| 6
any piece of this answer that regards your
7 | 6
A. Yes, I know that. |\n| assets or not assets, Mr. Kwok, on advice of | 7
Q. Are you aware that you also asked for |\n| counsel, you should decline to respond to
8 | punitive damages?
8
9 |\n| 9
the question and invoking your right to the
Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
10 | A. Yes, I know that. But then you see |\n| 11 | 10 the thing is, in the past, right, he has -- not in
11 the past. I know that because he has caused me so |\n| To the extent, it's about
Mr. Cheng's assets, you can answer.
12 | 12 much damage and he has tens of -- several tens of |\n| A. Well, you see, Cheng Shuiyan has a
13 | 13 a million dollar. |\n| 14 hotel in Las Vegas and Lude also said that he has | I know that. And then he -- what
14 |\n| 15 other profit shares, and based on the Mongolian | 15 he did cost me so much of destruction, cost me so |\n| 16 policeman who had to interview a lot of the | 16 much threat, and then cost me so much fear and |\n| 17 people, those people have told me that Cheng | 17 then full of this -- because he have made those |\n| 18 Shuiyan has a lot of properties probably in | 18 malicious, defamed accusation allegation of me, |\n| 19 Mongolia as well. | 19 calling me rapist, calling me killer, calling me |\n| So based on those information,
20 | 20 criminal, and so when I was asking him of that |\n| 21 Cheng Shuiyan is reported to have a billion | 21 punitive damage, it is really full of good faith |\n| 22 dollars at least of the asset. Wealthy enough to | 22 and he is well capable of paying it. |\n| 23 send me to prison in China and have me deported | And also you see he and his
23 |\n| 24 into a China to be imprisoned there. | 24 personal employee, Marco, wrote to the Department |\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g865 dPage 35 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021 34 (133 to 136)\n\n| | 001100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 133
stated I was wanted in the Chinese -- in China by | ો રેર
to be made responsible for his employee, his
l |\n| 2
the Chinese government. | personal employee, Marco, who had kept on making
2 |\n| 3
Now, I have never seen any such | 3
all this allegation about me and spreading |\n| 4
document that stated that I am a wanted person in | 4
malicious rumors and gossipped about me. He have |\n| 5 China by the Chinese government. So where did | 5
to be made to take that responsibility. |\n| 6 they get these government -- they fabricated this | 6
(Simultaneous crosstalk) |\n| 7 document and all that is because they had the | 7
Q. There is no question. There is no |\n| 8 purpose of deporting me into China back into the | 8
question? |\n| | 9
MR. GAVENMAN: We can wait until the |\n| 9 hand of the Chinese government and then wanting me
10 dead. So that is malice. | 10 |\n| Now, do you think that can be
11 | next question is pending. |\n| | Mr. Wolman asks a question and
11 |\n| 12 actually paid and that is actually enough to be | 12
then you can continue to respond. |\n| 13 paid for by just tens of thousands or that kind of | Q. You mentioned a letter at Department
13 |\n| 14 a punitive damage? | 14 of Justice from my client. Why have you not |\n| ા ર
Q. Thank you. | 15 produced it? |\n| (Simultaneous crosstalk)
16 | A. Well, the thing is that document was
16 |\n| Q. Please, there is no question. Excuse
17 | 17 written by Cheng Shuiyan and his personal |\n| 18 me, excuse me, there is no question. Excuse me. | 18 employee, Marco, to DOJ, he, himself. They openly |\n| 19 Excuse me. Excuse me. Excuse me. There was no | 19 talked about it, tweet about it online, over the |\n| 20 question pending. | 20 internet. |\n| (Simultaneous crosstalk)
21 | So it was -- it should be they
21 |\n| A. But I haven't finished. I haven't
22 | 22 who need to go and get that document and provide |\n| 23 finished my answer. | 23 to you. That is their document. And that has |\n| 24
Well, you see the thing is, all | 24 already been sent to DOJ. How can I get such a |\n| 25 the things that he has said have been forwarded | 25 document? How can I get it from the DOJ? |\n| 134 | 136 |\n| 1 and have been transmitted in mainland China and | 1
Yet they have tweeted it and they |\n| forwarded to millions and tens of millions and
2 | 2
have openly talked about it on Google, online, and |\n| 3
perhaps like hundreds of millions of the viewers. | it is constantly harassing me with that kind of a
3 |\n| 4
And then those messages were | statement and the damage they have caused is
4 |\n| 5
constantly calling me Guo rapist and Guo criminal | really, you know, can't be estimated. And that is
5 |\n| 6 and stating that the, in America, Department of | why the damage has to be sought.
6 |\n| 7 Justice is going to deport me back into China and | 7
Q. You said -- you don't have the |\n| 8 then calling me peasant, using words that -- as | document, correct? You don't -- don't --
8 |\n| 9 filthy as anything that can be and those words and | 9
(Simultaneous crosstalk) |\n| 10 those messages is going to accompany me throughout | MR. WOLMAN: Counsel, instruct your
10 |\n| 11 life. It's never going to be erased, never able | 11
client to wait for a question. He gives an |\n| 12 to be disappeared. | 12
answer. I get to now ask another question. |\n| So you see, that is in return to
13 | 13
This is how it works. |\n| 14 my kindness that only at the beginning, I had a | MR. GAVENMAN: Jay, you didn't follow
14 |\n| 15 dinner with him, and also during that time, I was | any instructions when it was your client
ો ર |\n| 16 very kind, I was very nice and return. Then he | doing unbelievable things. He is giving the
16 |\n| 17 treated me with such malice and turning white to | answer, complete answers. You have to let
17 |\n| 18 black and then calling me all kind of names. Of | him complete the answer.
18 |\n| 19 course, I'm going to pursue him. I would never | MR. WOLMAN: He is filibustering.
19 |\n| 20 give up in pursuing him with the damage. | MR. GAVENMAN: You are asking
20 |\n| (Simultaneous crosstalk)
21 | questions about this document, why it wasn't
21 |\n| 22
Q. Hold on, hold on, it's not responsive | produced and he is giving you an answer.
22 |\n| 23 to my question. You are filibustering again. | Q. Do you have the document?
23 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: It's not a filibuster.
24 | A. So I haven't completed my previous
24 |\n| | |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/129122113:56:166 dPage 36 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n35 (137 to 140)\n\n| | 1 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 137
Q. Do you have the document, yes or no?
1 | 139
Did you provide your attorney |\n| 2
MR. GAVENMAN: You need to allow him | with any of the documents that were used to
2 |\n| 3
to complete his answers. That's fundamental | 3
respond to the requests for production in this |\n| 4
in a deposition. He has to be able to | 4
case? |\n| 5
complete his answer. You asked why not. | 5
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. |\n| 6
There is a pending question. He has to be | 6
A.
What documents? |\n| 7
able to complete it. | 7
Q. Are you aware that your attorney |\n| 8
MR. WOLMAN: It was nonresponsive. | produced documents to us in this case?
8 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: That's simply not
9 | Of course I know.
0
A. |\n| true. He was talking about the documents
10 | Q. And do you know what those documents
10 |\n| and its whereabouts.
11 | 11 were? |\n| MR. WOLMAN: I withdraw that previous
12 | A.
Of course I know.
12 |\n| 13
question then. | Q. Excellent. So did you give any of
13 |\n| Q. My question is, do you have a copy of
14 | 14 them to him? |\n| 15 that document? | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
ો ર |\n| A. I need to continue to answer my
16 | Of course.
A.
16 |\n| 17 previous question. | Q. Which documents did you give to him?
17 |\n| Q. No, I've withdrawn that.
18 | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
18 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: He withdrew that
19 | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, do you
19 |\n| 20
question. | mind if I ask the witness to clarify because
20 |\n| This is pretty much the same
21 | I can't hear clearly.
21 |\n| question. You can explain why you do or
22 | MR. WOLMAN: Sure.
22 |\n| do not have an answer to that question.
23 | A. The document you have seen was
23 |\n| Q. Do you have that document? There is
24 | 24 provided by our counsel which, in turn, provided |\n| 25 no explanation. Yes or no. Do you have it? | 25 by me to my counsel. |\n| | |\n| | |\n| 138 | 140 |\n| 1
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
MR. WOLMAN: Move to strike as | However, however, I don't have
1
2 |\n| 2 | the document that was written by Marco or Cheng
న |\n| 3
nonresponsive.
4
(Simultaneous crosstalk) | Shuiyan to DOJ and that is why I want to actually
ask them to get that document.
ব |\n| 5
A. But you can't -- you can't -- you | 5
Q. I'm asking about any of the documents |\n| | that were produced in the response to the request
6 |\n| don't know what I'm answering, counsel.
6
Q. I've been listening long enough to
7 | for production of documents. Not your
7 |\n| understand what yes and no mean in Mandarin. | |\n| 8
ல் | 8
interrogatory answers.
Did you provide any of them to
9 |\n| A. This is my right to answer your
10 question and then I am speaking in Chinese and you | 10 your counsel for production? |\n| 11 don't know what I am saying. You must allow me to | A. Yes, I provided those documents to my
11 |\n| 12 answer your question. | 12 counsel. |\n| Q. I hear your answer, including Marco
13 | Q. Which ones?
13 |\n| 14 and my client's name. I want to know do you have | A. Anything that you can see were mostly
14 |\n| 15 the letter, period. | 15 provided by me. |\n| (Simultaneous crosstalk)
16 | Q. Excellent.
16 |\n| Move to strike.
17 | How did you get them to him?
17 |\n| Marco and his boss have them.
A.
18 | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
18 |\n| Do you have it?
Q.
19 | A. Well, I handed to my lawyer. That
19 |\n| I don't have.
20
A. | 20 would be it. |\n| Have you ever had it?
21
Q. | Q. You handed them to Mr. Gavenman?
21 |\n| No.
22
A. | A. I mean that I gave them to the lawyer
22 |\n| 23
Have you ever seen it?
Q. | 23 in Golden Spring. |\n| No.
24
A. | Q. Where did you find these documents to
24 |\n| Q. Thank you, that was easy enough.
25 | 25 give to the Golden Spring lawyer? |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZ31KPFileDd3/119/02/113722113:56:167 dPage 37 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n36 (141 to 144)\n\n| 141 | 143 |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| A. I don't know which document you are
1 | to not reveal anything about what you heard |\n| talking about.
2 | 2
in an attorney/client communication about |\n| 3
Any of them.
Q. | 3
what your attorneys were doing separately |\n| 4
A. I cannot answer for all of them. | 4
from you. |\n| 5
There are so many of them. | 5
This needs to be only things that |\n| Q. Pick one that you gave to your lawyer
6 | 6
you understand, only things that you did |\n| at Golden Spring and tell me where it came from.
7 | and not things that come from
7 |\n| A. But I don't think that as a lawyer
8 | 8
understanding about what your attorneys |\n| 9 that you can say such a general term as any of | did.
9 |\n| 10 them. You know. I don't think this is something | A. My answer is that I don't recall.
10 |\n| 11 that the professional lawyer should say. | Q. Did you look for any documents to
11 |\n| Q. I figured this time there would be an
12 | 12 respond in this case? |\n| 13 actual answer to the question. | 13
A.
Of course. |\n| THE INTERPRETER: Is that a question
14 | And where did you look?
Q.
14 |\n| to the witness?
] ર | I don't recall.
15
A. |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Strike that.
16 | Q. Where would you look if I were to
16 |\n| Madam court reporter, could you
17 | 17 reask you those very same questions? |\n| 18 | 18
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. |\n| please repeat my question. | |\n| THE INTERPRETER: You mean repeat the
19 | A. I don't know. I don't quite
19 |\n| interpreting to the witness or are you
20
asking the court reporter to repeat the | 20 understand really what you mean.
Q. The documents you provided to respond
21 |\n| 21 | |\n| question --
22 | 22 to -- or to look for in response to the request |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Read back the question
23 | 23 for production, just appear by magic? |\n| and then you will reinterpret.
24 | MR. GAVENMAN: Again, I caution you,
24 |\n| 25
(Record read) | 25
anything you know from your attorneys or |\n| 142
A. I don't understand. I don't know that
1 | 144
attorney/client communications, please don't |\n| | |\n| | |\n| to pick which document.
2 | 2
reveal those communications. To the extent |\n| 3
And the thing is that you see | 3
you know anything outside of that, you're |\n| there are a thousand pages of the documents and so
ব | 4
free to answer. |\n| 5 I should know that to pick which one and to talk | 5
A. Well, of course anything that is in |\n| about it, where it came from.
6 | the conversation between myself and my counsel, I
6 |\n| 7
And also with the translation, it | 7
cannot talk about here. I cannot talk about here. |\n| 8 says any of the documents, you know. In my life, | 8
But as to myself, how did I look for |\n| 9 I never have anything that is any of the documents | 9 those documents, I just don't remember. I don't |\n| 10 such a general term. It's either right or wrong. | 10 recall. |\n| Q. Where were the documents, these
11 | 11
Q. Where would you go to look for them |\n| 12 thousands of pages that you assembled to give to | 12 today if you were being asked? |\n| 13 the lawyer at Golden Spring? | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
13 |\n| A. I don't know.
14 | A. OK, so you see like, for example,
14 |\n| When did you give the documents to
Q.
ો ર | 15 right, the communication between Marco and Cheng |\n| 16 this lawyer? | 16 Shuiyan, for example, this kind of evidence, Marco |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
17 | 17 is Cheng Shuiyan's personal employee and they |\n| A. Well, in the past several years and
18 | 18 said, they claimed that they wrote to the DOJ. |\n| 19 there are so many times, I don't know exactly | 19 And to deport me. And then calling me online |\n| 20 which specific time that you are talking about. | 20 about that I was a liar and I was a rapist and so |\n| Q. In response to the second revised
21 | 21 on and so forth, and all of that, they |\n| 22 request for production of documents propounded on | 22 acknowledged and they openly treated that. |\n| 23 you in this case, tell me what you did to search | 23
So you only need to search online |\n| 24 for documents to produce.
MR. GAVENMAN: I have to caution you
ટર્ર | 24 to produce that, and that's one way. And they
25 make phone call. For example, I make phone call |\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n37 (145 to 148)\n\n| Conducted on April 1, 2021 | |\n|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|\n| 145 | 147 |\n| to the people that they have talked to in mainland | 1 dollars from him. And that had already been very |\n| China. I make phone call to Lude who they had
2 | 2
clear evidence that we -- we act in good faith. And |\n| 3
talked to about that -- about what they want him | of course, the only thing here is we only want to
3 |\n| 4
to do or said. | 4
tell the truth. |\n| 5
So all of that -- and then I call them | 5
Q. Were any of the documents in this case |\n| 6
and got those answers, and so that is a way to | 6
provided to you by your attorneys? |\n| 7
search for those, those information. | 7
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection, asked and |\n| 8
And also, like I said, Marco | 8
answered about four times. |\n| 9
later on, you know, Marco and Cheng Shuiyan, they | 9
MR. WOLMAN: Asked yes, answered no. |\n| 10 talked about all of things that they have done and | MR. GAVENMAN: He is answering the
10 |\n| 11 they tweeted it online and you search online and | question. It's part of the responsive
11 |\n| 12 you get all this information online and then later | documents -- I don't want a speaking
12 |\n| 13 on, that, you know, after -- at the Nevada case, | objection, but these are -- that's his
13 |\n| 14 he disappeared, Marco disappeared. He was a | answer and there is a reason that's his
14 |\n| 15 personal employee of Cheng Shuiyan. | ાં ર
answer. |\n| So Cheng Shuiyan should be made
16 | MR. WOLMAN: Did any of the documents
16 |\n| 17 responsible for whatever he did or said anyway. | you produced come from him?
17 |\n| 18 So all of that was actually appeared online | MR. GAVENMAN: He's clearly answered
18 |\n| 19 because they have many tweeters online and they | that question and I'm not being deposed so
19 |\n| 20 have tweet it out there openly. That is a way to | you can ask questions, he is answering them
20 |\n| 21 search for those information. | 21
and we can move on. |\n| Q. But where would you go to find
22 | MR. WOLMAN: He is not answering. He
22 |\n| 23 documents responsive to the requests? | doesn't seem to remember where documents
23 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
24 | were produced or what he produced or where
24 |\n| 25
A. Well, for example, when we -- when you | they came from. So I'm asking you.
25 |\n| 146 | 148 |\n| see that, for example, Cheng Shuiyan reported that
1 | MR. GAVENMAN: I'm not being deposed
1 |\n| 2 he have a billion of dollar of asset and he | 2
here today. So you can ask a questions -- |\n| 3
purported that he is person, but for all these | MR. WOLMAN: Actually, right now, I'm
3 |\n| kind of purported claim, of course I can call
4 | 4
engaging with you in a meet and confer |\n| 5
people in China trying to ascertain his, the words | 5
because I'm not sure -- |\n| of his claim. So that is one way to search.
6 | MR. GAVENMAN: This is not the time
6 |\n| 7
And then also that Cheng Shuiyan | 7
and place for a meet and confer while he is |\n| 8 and Marco, so Marco is his personal employee | 8 being deposed. And I know you know that. |\n| 9 and he need to be -- Cheng Shuiyan need to be | 9 It's not meet and confer time now. So |\n| 10 responsible for whatever Marco has said and done | 10 continue your deposition we can meet and |\n| 11 and so he was his boss. | 11 confer afterwards if you like to. |\n| So that need to be -- that is open
12 | MR. WOLMAN: Well, it seems like it
12 |\n| 13 knowledge and that is the things that we know. | 13 would be useful for us to confer as to |\n| When we brought the case in
14 | 14 whether or not he actually conducted an |\n| 15 Nevada, we brought the case in good faith. The | 15 appropriate search. And then maybe once we |\n| 16 proof, the evidence of that is we only claim for a | 16 have established that, well, he didn't |\n| 17 very small amount and we did not claim for | 17 provide you any documents, we can go with |\n| 18 millions of dollars even though that he has -- he | 18 that. |\n| 19 claimed that himself, he had that billion dollars | But if you want, we can keep going,
19 |\n| 20 of this account of assets. | 20 sure. But I was trying to make this easier |\n| But of course, when we are talking about
21 | 21 for you. |\n| 22 the people in China, subsequently a lot of people | 22
MR. GAVENMAN: Thank you for your |\n| 23 were made disappeared and the thing is that he had | 23 care and concern. As always. Please |\n| 24 caused me all this destruction and all this kind of | 24 continue. |\n| 25 a harm, we did not seek millions and millions of | 25
MR. WOLMAN: Not a problem. |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFileDd3/119/2254 Enteried:00118822113:569 dPage 39 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n38 (149 to 152)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 149 | 151 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| THE INTERPRETER: Is there a | too much damage, too much of a harm that he has |\n| 2
question, counsel? | caused me.
2 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: There is not.
3 | 3
For example, just a simple term, |\n| 4
Q. You said Mr. Cheng caused you a lot of | to him, it's only a simple word. He called me a
4 |\n| 5
harm. How do you value that harm? | rapist. But the damage it caused me, how can I
5 |\n| 6
A. Well, so it is going to be a very, | account for that? How can anyone just fathom the
6 |\n| 7
very long story. You need to have some | damage that it is?
7 |\n| 8
preparation. It's going to be a long story. | 8
So of course I have to value it |\n| 9
Q. No, I'm asking you how you value the | and then calculating it. I'm in the middle of
9 |\n| 1 () harm. | 10 doing it. |\n| A. Well, you see, I am at the moment
11 | Q. How was it that you came up with
11 |\n| 12 preparing some kind of premises to how to gauge | 12 your claim against Jonathan Ho valued at 5 |\n| 13 the destruction and harm caused by Cheng Shuiyan. | 13 million; your claim against Jianbin Yuan at 5 |\n| 14 I have been calling people in Japan, Hong Kong | 14 million; your claim against Liang for 100 million; |\n| 15 PRC, U.S. and some of the partners before. | 15 your claim against Baotang for 1 million; your |\n| You see a lot of these people at
16 | 16 claim against Eliang Xia for 5 million; your claim |\n| 17 the moment, they were under threat and they were | 17 against Xianmin Xiong for 100 million? |\n| 18 not -- they did not want to, you know, be the | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, I will
18 |\n| 19 witness and tell how much threat and how much | 19
probably need you to repeat those names. |\n| 20 damage, and they know that Cheng Shuiyan and | MR. WOLMAN: Sure.
20 |\n| 21 Marco, his personal employee, have caused me | MR. GAVENMAN: I want to caution, to
21 |\n| 22 because they were being sort of under threat and | the extent any of that information, any of
22 - |\n| 23 also they know from the open allegation that made | your understanding about why that was put in
23 - |\n| 24 by Cheng Shuiyan and his personal employee, Marco, | those various complaints or how the value
24 - |\n| 25 that I will be deported by the Department of | was done that came from counsel, you should
25 |\n| 150 | 152 |\n| Justice to mainland China and I will be deported | not reveal those communications. |\n| 2 to mainland China and they have made that kind of | 2
To the extent that you can answer |\n| allegation on Twitter, on Geteer, talking about
3 | 3
that without revealing attorney/client |\n| 4 that I will be deported -- not only that I will be | communications, you are free to do so.
4 |\n| 5
deported. They keep on saying that I will be shot | 5
THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, you said 5 |\n| 6 to death by the Chinese government. And they keep | 6
million, the first name is Jonathan? |\n| repeating that so that cause a lot of fear by a
7 | MR. WOLMAN: Jun Chen, also known as
7 |\n| lot of the people that I have worked with in the
8 | 8
Jonathan Ho. |\n| 9 past. | டு
THE INTERPRETER: And that is one |\n| So he cost me my consultant jobs
10 | 10 person, right? |\n| 11 and he cost me a lot of this kind of a damage and | MR. WOLMAN: Yes.
11 |\n| 12 it is unaccountable and it would be these, I think | THE INTERPRETER: And that's 5
12 |\n| 13 if I am gauging such kind of a value, I would say | 13 million? |\n| 14 several tens of millions at least. | MR. WOLMAN: Yes.
14 |\n| ાર
Q. You said he cost you a consultant job | THE INTERPRETER: Then 100 million
ો ર |\n| 16 and damages. What consultant job and what damage? | 16 Liang, someone Liang, and 1 million, |\n| A. I cannot answer them here for you.
17 | 17 Baotang, Baotang, 5 million Xia -- |\n| Q. Why not?
18 | 18 something. |\n| 19
A. Because at this point, I just cannot | 19
MR. WOLMAN: Y-E-L-I-A-N-G, X-I-A. |\n| 20 remember them. | THE INTERPRETER: And then 100
20 |\n| 21
Q. But somehow -- you can't remember jobs | 21 million, Xiong something? The last name. |\n| 22 that were valued had a worth of tens of millions | MR. WOLMAN: 100 million was
22 |\n| 23 of dollars? | 23 X-I-A-N-M-I-N, X-I-O-N-G. |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
24
25 A. A. It's because -- it's because -- well, | MR. GAVENMAN: One moment please
24
25 recall my instruction about the attorney/ |\n| | |\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 40 of ¡¡¢£¤\n\n| | 92 | | |\n|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---|\n| | | t*n\\$y\\$(
z{ }~z€}~' | |\n| | | o&+S | |\n| |
| | |\n| | | T,+ &UU
| |\n| | !\"!!# \\$ | -.V41B472?41B472<4;;3. | |\n| | !%& &\\$! | T,WX(!U#&%(
| |\n| | #' &(!)*! | Y,Z#,
| |\n| | +##!*, | [\\]^_,#,^
P,#,`
| |\n| | -./0112345674829:;<=49>112=?0 | T,a&!%(!!
P | |\n| | @><0<=?>=345A07=:470BC5<=7482D>@=5>113 | &\\$ &( % b
Q | |\n| | B47E=;0A0AF0;=?0A.-7BDB47E=;0>113;0A0AF0; | Y\\,Z+cdeY+e^f%g*#,
R | |\n| | ?48=?4<0>A457=49=?0B>A>G080;00H>15>=0B. | -.h4. | |\n| | I5==?0=?:7G:<=?>=D@>7=011 | T,a % **\\$!Z
S | |\n| | 345=?>==?038:11F00H>15>=0BF><0B47=?0?>;A | i &!b
| |\n| | =?>==?03?>H0@>5<0B>7B>1<4=?09>@=<=?>=80 | -.DB47E=6748. | |\n| | ?>H0>7B=?07>1<4=?>==?00H>15>=:478451BF0 | T,j! &# &X(\\$b
| |\n| | @47B5@=0BF3A3J;490<<:47>11>830;<>7BKKF5=
| -.O?07DB47E=67482=?07DB47E=6748.
| |\n| | 470=?:7G345@>7<00:<=?>=345<00:7
| T,W# !,f!!
| |\n| | @4AJ>;:<4720H07=?45G?=?0B>A>G0@>5<0BF3
| Y,Z#Y,Y! !
P | |\n| | L>;@42M?07GN?5:3>7E 10AJ14300>7BM?07G
| \\$ &!b
Q | |\n| | N?5:3>7?:A<019A>3?>H0F007A4;02A4;0074;A45<
| -.k45A0>78?>=4=?0;J04J10lDB47E=
| |\n| | =?>7=?4<0KK=?0J04J10=?>=J;0H:45<13 | m5:=057B0;<=>7B. | |\n| | A07=:470B280?>H074=><60B94;B>A>G0KK=?>= | T,n &! !\\$ !
S | |\n| | A5@?49>B>A>G0.O?>=?>< 487<4A 7349G44B | !Y,Z#Y,Y!
| |\n| | 9>:=?:745;J>;==?>=8?0780F;45G?=94;8>;B | &UU\\$!!#% Y,o!
| |\n| | =?>=@><0. | &!p,i,ao&*!
| |\n| | -7B=?0:;473249@45;<02:<=?>=
| i&!a*e\\$q(b
| |\n| | 8014<=2>7B<449@45;<0F0@>5<049=?>=280
| -.h4.
| |\n| |
| | P |\n| | 57B0;<=>7B=?0;0: A>G0=?03?>H0B470 | T,'&
| |\n| | 8><<4G;0>=>7B=?0780?>H0>F<415=013=?09>:=? | Y,Z#*#*
| |\n| | =?>=80>;0G4:7G=4;0708@><0>7B<006B>A>G0 | ,j!!#* b
| |\n| | F0@>5<0=?03?>H0@>5<0B<4A5@?B>A>G0. | -.DB47E=6748.
| |\n| | T,q&X##%UU | T,n &! #*
| |\n| P | [i#&&(` | b
P | |\n| | -.V>7G472?>7G47.V>7G47.O?08:7B | Y\\,Z+cdeY+e^f%g*#,
Q | |\n| | ?> -./0112D?>H0748>349>7<80;:7G
| | | -./0112D?>H0748>349>7<80;:7G
| |\n| | 8:7B48.D=E 5<0=?08:7B:<<4 | F0@>5<0=?:<:<>@=5>113@47@0;7:7GF0=8007 | |\n| | 145B2D84;;38?>=:=?><@>5<0BB:<;5J=:47. | A>==0; 7BA3@457<01. | |\n| | T,j! &*, | T,e &#* &!!
| | Y\\,Z+cdeY+e^j!%
| \\$ ,
| |
| %&\\$!&\\$(%!#
| -./011280?>H007G>G0B1>830;<.D | |
| %(*bj!%!
| B47E=67488?:@?1>830;345E;0=>16:7G>F45=.
| |
| \\$U!&!,
| T,t#!\\$ &!
| |
| T,W#(r&%*\\$
P | & *\\$!&!
P | |
| !\\$! &X##%*&*
Q | &,
Q | |
| #&& )%& SRb
R | Y\\,Z+cdeY+e^f%g*#,
R | |
| Y\\,Z+cdeY+e^f%g*#,
_ | -.I5=DB47E=;0@>11>737>A0.h4=0H07 | |
| -./0112D?>H0<4A0@><0<:7J07B:7G. | 470. | |
| D@>774=J4<<:F13;0A0AF0;0>@?49=?0A5710<T,n\\$ &(\\$\\$! &\\$ b
| | |
| s4B4;N5J0;A>7.I5=D;0>113B47E=;0@>11. | -./0112DC5<=6748.N4D;0@4G7:u0=?0 | |
| T,n &&&!&# | 9>@0.v:6094;0w>AJ10=4B>32x099>JJ0>;0B?0;02 | |
| *#PSb
| D1446>=?:A2D6748=?>=?0:7B=?07?0
| |
| -./0112D84;60B8:=?A3@457<01<.
| : | |
| |\n\nW+edtadfi RRR,,QPQjjj,W+edtadfi,ofY\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 41 of z{|}~}~}~{}~\n\n| | m!\\$%U6fa
nopqrstuqvow |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | 9&#\\$&ZU% ` |\n|
!\"#
\\$# %&'
()*+,-./012344)
5!%6%\"'
()718)
5!%'
()*+,-./012344)
9# &%:'
()*+,-./;-,<)
=\\$# &%:'
|
M
;-, 341CI1>341C
+@II101-/032183-++@II101-/1/D-@2@/G)*+,-./
;-,<
303213-+?10D3?8G,F301IF44,ID3/01+3-+IF44
,I032@8>)
BD3/1J10*D3J1C/D1G301E,,+
N
433A,F//D10321,01/D-@2@/G)
R#!ST\" !ST&%&
M
#%U # '
|\n| ()*+,-./;-,<)
9# &%:% %'
()*>?,88@A41)
=!:6%\"&
% %9#%&6#6
()B144C/D1/D@-E@8/D3//D12,F0/@83 | ()*83@+V*)V*+@+-,/83GV<1)V*/
<38/D1@-/10?01/10
&#U! !'<br>O<br>WXYZ[\\]WZ]^_&&\"%\\$6<br><br>\\$#! `WY#&\\$ %!!U&<br><br>L#!%%\"a%bU\\$%6<br><br>c%6Z&%_=9!%#%<br></td></tr><tr><td>810@,F8CD344,<1+?4321)*01344G+,-.//D@-;<1<br><br>8D,F4+H,;13A,F//D3/,0>3;14@ED/,I3-G/D@-E<br>/D3/@8+@82F881+@-D101)<br><br>*-1J10>1/3-G43<G1032/1+4@;1<br>G,F)7,F;-,<CG,F;11?,-38;@-E>1/,EF188,0<br><br>18/@>3/1C?10D3?8C3-+8,,-C8,I,0/DC@/.8<br><br>01344G4F+@20,F8)<br><br>K#\"!6L#!%'<br></td><td>Z#U%b\\$%% &6!<br>%U\\$&!6\\$%% \\$%\"%'<br>M<br>WXYZ[\\]WZ]^d&\"%\\$6\\$#! `<br><br>WY#&\\$ %!!L#!%<br><br>%\"a%b%!%b!#&c%6<br><br>Z&6_=9!%#%<br>O<br>Z&\\$##U&#\\$&&%!\\$#!!!<br><br>6e%b&6<br>:% %& !bfb<br></td></tr><tr><td><br>()*+,-./;-,<)<br>K#\\$# \"%&<br><br>#&& !'<br>O<br>()*+,-./;-,<)<br><br>%!%#: \\$b%e<br><br>!U\\$%6%\\$ WY\"g!6\\$#\\$# &<br><br>\"U% #&&6\\$!<br><br>:'<br>()*+,-./;-,<)<br># &#:: &!\\$%:<br><br>UU\\$6#\\$%% &6!'<br><br>()*+,-./;-,<)<br><br>5!#\\$%% &6!<br>O<br>6 '<br><br>WXYZ[\\]WZ]^d:h\\$%6<br><br>()*+,-./;-,<)<br>N<br>5!#\\$%% &6!<br><br>#ii!%a<br>K#a6%\\$%\\$<br>M<br>#\\$%% &6!%!'<br><br>()B144C*<38-,/3A41/,3-8<10G,F0<br><br>PF18/@,-A123F81CG,F;-,<C<1D3J143<G108<D,<br><br>301I1>341C>341)*01344G+,-./;-,<D,</,<br></td><td><br>5&%!\\$#!!!<br>% %!!6%b<br><br>!\\$#%%!#& %!fa#b<br><br>66!\\$U%!<br>O<br>T!66!<br><br>\\$U%!'<br><br>()B144C>G3-8<10@8-,)*-I32/C*<br>N<br>32/F344GC<D1-*D130@/C*I@-+/D3/@/@8<br>3A8,4F/14G0@+@2F4,F8)<br><br>Z#6&%!\\$#!!&<br>M<br>k!#:<br>M<br>%%\\$ #U&#\\$&'<br><br>WXYZ[\\]WZ]^d:h\\$6<br><br>d:h\\$%6<br><br>Y&`%6#\\$!%#<br>O<br> a%b`#\\$!%<br><br>()*+,-./01344G;-,<)<br><br>R#U&#\\$&%\\$ 6=#<br><br>9%W%bl!6Z#b#!<br>`<br>`% &`<br><br>Sc#b%%\"9%!m\\$`Y#Tb#%`!_=<br>k% %K !6Z!!!ce:bfb<br>M<br>\\$#!S<br><br>Z#6% %%<br><br>%\\$ '<br><br>()718)<br><br>Z&%6!#%b<br><br></td></tr></tbody></table> |\n\n| m \"=YnY^
b#@\"#* [!
23cBH3
<\\$%\" ?@\"Y\"&
'(\\$)*+,-'*-./#> @[!
'\\$)@#[ \"#\"\"]@\"
>^ \\ \\\"@#\"_ \"
d
*#\"\"`\\$a\\$b\" \"@\" \\$
<\\$*?@@ \\\"Y&
23cBH3
<\\$e\"[\"0^!f#
@ [#_0@?!\\$%?Y
\"[[ [#\"#?&
'(\\$)*+,-'*-.f@\" ?@\"\"
g\"\"?@#\"# \\Y?\"\"
@#\"\"?h[ \"
@ \" ! ?@YY \"@\"
d
>[ \\\"\"?h[ \" > [\\#
|\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| |\n| \" !?@i\"Y\\$
|\n| 2349FHI5BQFHF67NI5BOPNPHBCJI75
|\n| 9EBQ6R7HBCI759EK6RGE9EB5FHQRHHF67DH6F9FH |\n| MKFLFCBGB534QI7769I7H;BK9EI93 |\n| <\\$% \"@\"? \\Y\"?@# @#Y \"
|\n| ?@[Y?!Y?# #?@\\\"> \"[[
|\n| [#\"#?&
|\n| '(\\$)*+,-'*-.*#\\ !\"\"
|\n| g\"\"?@@#\"# \\Y#\"
d |\n|
|\n| \"\"?h[ \"@ \"
|\n| g\"#\"\"?h[ \"
|\n| @ \" ?@@[#\">[\"\"\\$
m\"g\"\"?@Y |\n|
Y \"@\">[ \\\"\"?h[ \"
d |\n| @ \" !?@i\"Y\\$
|\n| '(\\$%/k'*-.m^?@ \\
|\n| \\ \\$
|\n| '(\\$)*+,-'*-.j@i\"ZZ \"i
|\n| \"\"?h[ \"@ \" \\$j@^YZZ
|\n| '(\\$%/k'*-.f[#?@\"\"\" \"
|\n| \"]@\" \"[\\$
|\n| '(\\$)*+,-'*-.a?!Y\"Y\"\"&
|\n| '(\\$%/k'*-.f[#?@\" \" \"
|\n| \"]@\" \"[\\$a\" \\
d |\n| \"\"#\\$
|\n| '(\\$)*+,-'*-.fi\" \\\\$f
|\n| #i\"^YY?@g\" \">?
|\n| @#\"# \\Y?\"\"# Y#
|\n| Y \"@\" \"!0@\"\"\" !YZZ
|\n| '(\\$%/k'*-.e@YZZ
'(\\$)*+,-'*-.ZZY \"@\" |\n|
\"\"?h[ \"@ \" \\$
|\n| '(\\$%/k'*-.fi\"\\ \\\"
|\n| @[\" !0@\" \"@[#Y[[0 #\\$
d |\n| vk*-,mX,v/a |\n| w%%%\\$vk*-,mX,v/a\\$b/' |\n\n### Case 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/11375608113722113:56:13 dPage 43 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n42 (165 to 168)\n\n| 001000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 | |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|\n| 165
MR. GAVENMAN: Sure, and then he can | 167
suggested and I don't have to tell you that
1 |\n| 2
answer that portion -- | 2
my lawyer suggested it. |\n| 3
(Simultaneous crosstalk) | 3
Q. So tell me, Mr. Guo, without telling |\n| 4
MR. GAVENMAN: -- and say the | me about any communications you actually had with
4 |\n| attorney/client communications. And he is
5 | your lawyers, why did you decide to pull the
5 |\n| free to do that.
6 | trigger and have four cases filed on the same day?
6 |\n| 7
(Simultaneous crosstalk) | 7
MR. GAVENMAN: Again, to the extent |\n| MR. WOLMAN: He doesn't have to
8 | 8
this answer would reveal any amount of any |\n| reveal attorney/client communications.
9 | ರ
legal strategy between you and your counsel, |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Don't reveal anything
10 | you cannot talk about that portion.
10 |\n| 11 that came from an attorney/client | MR. WOLMAN: That is not correct. He
11 |\n| 12 communications, any understanding you had | 12
can reveal -- |\n| 13 that came from it. -- | MR. GAVENMAN: That's my instruction
13 |\n| MR. WOLMAN: Not understanding, not
14 | to my client. It's a question for the
14 |\n| 15 an understanding. | judge.
ો ર |\n| He can still tell me why he
16 | MR. WOLMAN: That's obstruction. You
16 |\n| 17 wanted to do something without telling | need to learn about privilege, Jeff. That's
17 |\n| 18 me what was discussed. Because he could | not how it works.
18 |\n| 19 think, oh, it's a great idea to do what | MR. GAVENMAN: Jay, very good, thank
19 |\n| 20 my lawyer told me without telling me | you for your help in being so wonderful as
20 |\n| 21 that his lawyer told him that. | 21
always. |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: And I said exactly
22 | Please move on. He can't answer
22 |\n| 23 along those lines. | that question if it is about
23 |\n| MR. WOLMAN: No, you didn't.
24 | attorney/client privileged information
24 |\n| 25
MR. GAVENMAN: If you answer the | and strategy that came from his
25 |\n| | |\n| 166 | 168 |\n| question -- | 1
attorney. |\n| 2
(Simultaneous crosstalk) | 2
If he said he can answer it |\n| 3
MR. GAVENMAN: You asked why you | 3
separately, he is free to do so. |\n| thought it would be a good idea -- I'm
4 | 4
Answer the question.
Q. |\n| 5 assuming there, some of that portion, at | 5
A. Well, there is no other reason really. |\n| least some of that answer is wrapped up in
6 | It's just that we have looked at all the cases,
6 |\n| attorney/client privilege.
7 | consolidate, in a consolidated manner, we look at
7 |\n| 8
If it's not, to the extent it's | 8
all of that, and then the counsel recommended |\n| 9 not, he is free to answer it. | 9 that, you know, that to put those four cases on |\n| To the extent it came from
10 | 10 the same day and that is all. |\n| 11 attorney discussions about what certain | Q. I'm a little confused because these
11 |\n| 12 things would happen, why certain things | 12 were filed, two in New York, one in New Jersey, |\n| 13 would happen certain ways, those are | 13 and one in Virginia. |\n| 14 privileged communication that he can't | How is this all one counsel
14 |\n| 15 reveal. | 15 having the idea to put them all in the same day? |\n| 16
MR. WOLMAN: He can still say I | I don't know.
A.
16 |\n| 17 decided to do something because of \"X\" even | 17
Q. Do you know when cases are filed on |\n| 18 if it was an idea his attorney told him.
19
MR. GAVENMAN: Well, if it was a | 18 your behalf?
Of course.
19
A. |\n| 20 privileged communication and privileged | Well, I'm actually quite curious,
20 |\n| 21 understanding -- | 21 counsel, why are you banging on this question |\n| MR. WOLMAN: I'm not asking him --
22 | 22 about one day filing cases for one day. I mean, |\n| 23 privileged goes to communications between | 23 it's such a strange and curious question. |\n| 24 you and your lawyer. Privilege does not go | Why can't the cases be filed on
24 |\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/129122113:56:184 dPage 44 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n43 (169 to 172)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| | 169 | 171 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| is wrong?
1 | | Q. Do you recall answering
1 |\n| 2
It's really if I recall that correctly, | | 2
interrogatories in that case? |\n| 3
this is the first time I ever heard of this | | 3
A. You mean what response -- what |\n| 4
question. | | 4
interrogatory to what case? |\n| 5
In fact, what I am saying, I | | 5
Q. Do you recall responding to written |\n| actually don't remember these four cases were
6 | | 6
questions in that case? |\n| 7 filed in one single day. And so that, you know, | | 7
A. I don't remember all of it. |\n| 8 if it were not you who keep on asking about this | | 8
Q. In response to interrogatory number 1 |\n| 9 question about these four cases all filed on the | | 9 in it, it says, quote, I will represent that this |\n| 10 same day, I would not have known there was such | | 10 is at Bates quote 3733, \"Plaintiff responds that |\n| 11 four cases and they were all filed on the same | | 11 he is an entrepreneur without a salary or income.\" |\n| 12 day. I really had no idea. | | Is that statement accurate?
12 |\n| Q. What is your relationship with Eastern
13 | | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel,
13 |\n| 14 Profit Corporation Limited? | | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question
14 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel,
। ર | | invoking his rights under the Fifth
ો ર |\n| Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question
16 | | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
16 |\n| invoking his rights under the Fifth
17 | | Q. Are you refusing to answer that
17 |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
18 | | 18 question? |\n| MR. WOLMAN: He filed a lawsuit
19 | | 19
A. Yes. |\n| against Strategic Vision in which he
20 | | Q. Was that statement accurate on the
20 |\n| 21
acknowledged that he was principle of | | 21 date it was made and filed being November 18, |\n| 22
that -- | | 22 2019? |\n| 23
MR. GAVENMAN: I understand. | | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel,
23 |\n| MR. WOLMAN: -- in the Southern
24 | | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question
24 |\n| 25
District of New York. | | invoking his rights under the Fifth
25 |\n| | 170 | 172 |\n| 1
MR. GAVENMAN: I understand. | | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
l |\n| 2
Q. Are you refusing to answer? | | 2
Q. Are you refusing to answer? |\n| 3
THE INTERPRETER: I haven't | | 3
A.
Yes. |\n| 4
interpreted. | | 4
Q. Did you reach a settlement in the case |\n| 5
MR. WOLMAN: Thank you. | | 5
with Mr. Xianmin Xiong? |\n| 6
A. Yes. | | A. Well, first of all, I must tell you
6 |\n| 7
How is our timing? Thave | | that the pronunciation of that name was wrong,
7 |\n| 8
other obligations. | | right?
8 |\n| ல்
MR. WOLMAN: I think I still have at | | 9
And the thing is I can say that |\n| 10
least another hour. | | 10 even to this date, that case was not entirely |\n| 11
MR. GAVENMAN: Fifty-nine minutes. | | 11 settled. |\n| 12
Q. You provided to us in your discovery | | Q. Are you aware that a stipulation of
12 |\n| 13 responses your responses and objections to | | 13 discontinuance was filed on September 15, 2020? |\n| 14 interrogatories in a lawsuit against by you | | A. Well, that's only one of the cases and
14 |\n| 15 against Xianmin Xiong, X-I-A-N-M-I-N, X-I-O-N-G. | | 15 there are other cases that were in connection with |\n| Do you recall answering
16 | | 16 Xianmin Xiong as well. |\n| 17 interrogatories in that matter? | | 17
Q. That case was dismissed with |\n| | | |\n| A. I actually don't know this person,
18
19 Xianmin Xiong, or perhaps it is the interpreter | | 18 prejudice, correct?
A. That is not true.
19 |\n| | | |\n| | | |\n| 20 did not interpret the name right. | | Q. Are you saying that the document filed
20 |\n| Q. Also known as X-I, N-U-O, also known
21 | | 21 on New York State's court electronic system is |\n| 22 as Frank, also known as Xino, also known as | | 22 incorrect? |\n| 23 X-I-N-O. | | 23
MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form. |\n| 24
A. So the name is Xiong Xianmin, I know,
25 I know this case. | | A. Well, perhaps the document was not
24
25 wrong, but then there are so many other cases that |\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/0254Enteried0091137221137569615 dPage 45 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n44 (173 to 176)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 173 | ો 75 |\n|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|\n| were -- that has some connection with Xiong | system for New York's courts between you and |\n| 2
Xianmin as well. | Xianmin Xiong other than the one that was
2 |\n| 3
Q. Did Xiong Xianmin or however you | 3
dismissed by a stipulation? |\n| 4
pronounce that or anyone on his behalf make any | 4
I don't know.
A. |\n| 5
payment in exchange for that case being | 5
Q. Who is Yanping Wang a/k/a Yvette Wang? |\n| discontinued with prejudice?
6 | A. She is from Golden Spring.
6 |\n| 7
A. No. | 7
Q. And what is her job at Golden Spring? |\n| 8
Q. Why would you have it discontinued | 8
So she is the president.
A. |\n| 9
with prejudice without any payment? | Q. Do you know anything about her lawsuit
9 |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: To the extent you can
10 | 10 against Xianmin Xiong? |\n| answer that without revealing any legal
11 | Yes.
A.
11 |\n| strategy communicated between you and your
12 | Q. What your role with respect to that
12 |\n| counsel, you're free to answer.
13 | 13 lawsuit, if any? |\n| A. Well, that was the strategy that I had
14 | A. No.
14 |\n| 15 together with my counsel. | Q. Have you spoken with Ms. Wang
15 |\n| Q. You sued that gentleman for 100 | |\n| 16 | 16 regarding this lawsuit? |\n| 17 million dollars. Do you not recall that? | A. No.
17 |\n| A. Yes.
18 | Q. I want to make sure I understand.
18 |\n| Q. How did it benefit you to dismiss that
19 | You have -- are you -- Yanping Wang,
19 |\n| 20 case without getting a dime in recovery? | 20 also known as Yvette Wang, is the president of |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: Objection to form.
21 | 21 Golden Spring that is financing your defense in |\n| 22
Objection to form and same caution. | 22 this case and has otherwise paid the judgments to |\n| 23
A. Well, that is actually a strategy that | 23 my client, but you have never discussed this case |\n| 24 we have arrived between myself and my counsel. | 24 with her, correct? |\n| Q. I understand. I don't need to know if
25 | MR. GAVENMAN: Object to form.
25 |\n| 174 | 176 |\n| a lawyer told you. I need to know how it
1 | 1
A.
Yes. |\n| 2
benefited you. | 2
Q. Does Golden Spring New York Limited |\n| 3
MR. GAVENMAN: Same caution. | 3
have a treasurer? |\n| 4
A. Well, the whole matter has not been | Of course there is.
4
A. |\n| 5
concluded. | 5
Q. Have you discussed this case with that |\n| 6
Q. What part of it is still ongoing since | 6
treasurer? |\n| 7
it was dismissed with prejudice? | 7
No.
A. |\n| 8
A. Well, I cannot just -- I cannot tell | Q. What is the name of the treasurer of
8 |\n| 9 you because that is the strategy that I and my | 9 Golden Spring Limited? |\n| 10 counsel arrived at. | I don't know.
10
A. |\n| Q. Is that counsel Mr. Steinberg?
11 | Q. Other than Ms. Wang, who can you
11 |\n| One of them.
12
A. | 12 identify as being an officer of Golden Spring? |\n| 13
Q. Have you filed any other lawsuits | I don't know.
13
A. |\n| 14 against Xianmin Xiong or however you pronounce it? | |\n| | Q. How did Golden Spring know to pay the
14 |\n| A.
Yes.
15 | 15 judgment against you by Mr. Cheng in the Nevada |\n| Where? In what court?
16
0. | 16 case? |\n| New York.
17
A. | A. Well, lawyers communication.
17 |\n| Have you produced a copy of that
18
(). | Q. Do you know the person -- who the
18 |\n| 19 complaint? | 19 person was at Golden Spring who initiated the wire |\n| I don't recall.
A.
20 | 20 transfers to our firm? |\n| 21
Q. When did you file this new case | I don't know.
21
A. |\n| | Q. Do you know who is authorized at
22 |\n| 22 against Xianmin Xiong?
23
A. I don't recall. | 23 Golden Spring to initiate wire transfers of funds? |\n| Q. Do you know if there is any reason why
24 | I don't know.
24
A. |\n| 25 there is no case currently on the electronic | Q. You produced to us some text messages
ટર |\n\n| | `#-&+%;#jZ
qrstuuvwtxyz |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|\n| | &(+,V' |\n| | |\n| | |\n| !\"#\\$%
| /01CD7E8S7D@0 |\n| #&!'\t()%#*+,+#+!!-. | :;,)%+. |\n| | |\n| /012345655782590 | /01CD7E8S7D@0 |\n| | |\n| :;+!-&*+) | :()##!#!#&#-&,-+ |\n| | |\n| ----+. | (+,%''. |\n| | |\n| /0<5==>?8@36388258?95ABC56578?8 | /01G377D8F5G3==6K5G?M?G3==I0 |\n| | |\n| 8D950 | :()#)-+T+\"++#!,+\" |\n| | |\n| :;+\\$-!*). | *))!#,%. |\n| /0<5==>1CD7E8F5G3==5H3G8=I0J5F23K6 | /01CD7E8F5G3==0 |\n| ?8@364?3<2386/KK>LB81F53==IG377D8F5G3==0 | :U(+,V''VW\"X,,+-
' |\n| :;+)\"!*,+*#,) | YY-+Z!# |\n| | |\n| ),#)-%&++!+-&#-.;!#!&!&Z%V''' | | |
| /0<5==>1MDB7C82590NDL5G3B65OO?7 | ,,#-%*!&\"+-)#-*#+,) |
| |
| 8238G365>?7825K368>37C825I63?C@238545F | #&!V''[-W\"X,,+-+&&.
|
| 82381MDB7C>1237C5COO1237C5C82598D825 | /0<5==>1CD7E8OO1C?C7E863I823825 |
| |
| =3@I5F60 | ?6@FD7\\01PB68CD7E8F5G3==0 |
| |
| ND1PB68237C5C82598D825=3@I5F6 | :])Z!#!#!# |
| |
L5G3B651MDB7C82590
| V''',,#-. |
:Q!+)%+!*.
| /01CD7E8S7D@0 |
| /01CD7E8F5G3==0 | :()#,%+%*) |
| ' |
| :Q!+)%+!*. | #)-+!#&#-. |
| |
| /01CD7E8F5G3==5?825F0 | /0<5==>182?7SOOIDB6558DC3I>1GD95 |
| |
:Q!+)\"+R!*)
,#)-.
| 25F58D376@5F825C5KD6?8?D793C5MDF825G365DM
^257\\N2B?I3701E97D825F5MDFIDB8D853G295 |
| /01CD7E8F5G3==0 | 2D@8DGD99B7?G385@?82388DF75I6237C=?7\\D825F |
| |
| \t' |
| :Q!+&!,#)-+)\"+R!*. | G3656MDF95>37C1M55==?S5 |
| K5FG578DM825 |
| /0<5==>1PB68\\34582598D825=3@I5F0 | 8?958238IDB3F5@368?7\\?793885F682383F5 |
| |
| :`a#R*#. | ?FF5=543788D825G36537C8D95>8238?63MDF9 |
| |
| /01237C5C82598Db37?5=>1L5=?5450 | DM3LB65>3MDF9DM8DF8BF537CIDB3F545FI@5== |
| :(+-]#+,!-#*++R+#, | 3@3F5DM82380 |
| |
| +-&--+\"#,+!#+c! | :[#&#,,)%*)#-R!\"! |
| _ | _ |
| R+%+&#+ | )--+R[-#)-#%* |
| |
/0d560
| #&!V''!#!&-)#&!&Z) |
| :()##%#,#-+)%+, | \"+-*#+,&#,)VQ\"+aV#iZi# |
| |
+!X#-]+-+&%T+\"++##\"#+-
' | +,-jZV
k+%!(RV\t!k,Vg
' |
| -*#*e#-!\"aVeY(YUYfY;YXYgYa. | lZVglZV'' |
| |
| /0d560 | ]+)&+R!#&!&Z%* |
| |
| :[-!##-)+h& | \"+-*#+,. |
| |
-!&*-+&&++!!#&#-.
| /01CD7E8F5G3==0 |
| /01CD7E8S7D@0 | :l-+%+#,+!#!%,Z- |
| |
| :(&&+\"!&Z+!#&#-V | #a,f+\"#!-!\")*#+, |
| _ | _ |
| #V''',,##)*+-*#)#-# | ]+!)R,,)##&!&Z%V''' |
| |
| R#+,+\"#)()##%!#. | ,,#-&*+\"+. |
/0d560
:;+!#V''',,#-\"+
' | ma(TXg(gnUo&+%*
Uo&+%*
' |
| )!#-. | /01CD7E8F5G3==0 |
| |
| /0<5==>1CD7E8L5=?545823812345 | :]+)R\"+#V*#+\" |
| |
| F5G5?45C8238>CD==3F636I580 | -V-+\"RV-+#V''',,#&!&Z |
| |
| :])Z+%!##)*#- | %*!pf]+-+& %!X#- |
| |
| ]+-+&%T+\"++##)#,).
|
| |\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled:03/119/02/113722113:56:18 7 dPage 47 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n46 (181 to 184)\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 181 | 183 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| I don't recall.
1
A. | Q. I'm asking you, do you want to change |\n| 2
Q. Is anybody, other than you, authorized | 2
any of your answers? |\n| 3
to deposit checks made payable to you? | 3
A. OK, so the changes that you see, all |\n| 4
I don't know.
A. | of these things that I just mentioned about,
4 |\n| Q. Have you filed income tax returns for
5 | right, and it's actually -- I remember when I
5 |\n| 6
calendar year 2020? | 6 answer you, I said that is May, but it actually |\n| 7
Of course.
A. | 7 started all in March, 2018, all the way through to |\n| 8
Q. Did you include this 12,000 dollar | 8 August, and then I sue him in September of 2018. |\n| payment for judgment as income in that tax return?
9 | 9 So that would be the change I would like to make. |\n| MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel,
10 | Q. Moving back to your lawsuit with
10 |\n| 11
Mr. Guo declines to answer the question | 11 Baosheng in Virginia, paragraph 107 of the |\n| invoking his rights under the Fifth
12 | 12 complaint in that matter states, \"Guo acted on |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
13 | 13 these false representations and relied on them |\n| 14
Q. Are you refusing to answer? | 14 when he gave Baosheng 42,000 dollars in total.\" |\n| Yes.
15
A. | My question to you is, what was the
ો ર |\n| Q. Are there any answers you've given
16 | 16 source of the 42,000 dollars? |\n| 17 today -- now that you have had a day to think | MR. WOLMAN: And before you make your
17 |\n| 18 about it that you wish to change? | speaking objection --
18 |\n| 19
A.
Yes. | MR. GAVENMAN: No, it's on advice of
19 |\n| Q.
20
And what is that? | counsel to respond to question --
20 |\n| A. Well, you see for the matter of Marco
21 | MR. WOLMAN: I want to make sure --
21 |\n| 22 and his employee relationship with Cheng Shuiyan | this case, this case went to trial, so I'm
22 |\n| 23 and they have sent out tweet messages, online | asking -- so he obviously put forth evidence
23 - |\n| 24 messages, and for the time they send the message | of that payment to Baosheng. So my question
24 |\n| 25 and the content of the message and also the | is -- that's already now out in the public
25 |\n| | |\n| | |\n| 182 | 184 |\n| 1 relationship -- and also that the message is sent | and public record. So my question here is |\n| 2 between them to Wang Ding Gang via WhatsApp and | 2
what was the source of that money?
MR. GAVENMAN: Mr. Guo declines to
3 |\n| 3 also just the matter that the personnel from | 4 |\n| 4 Bejing visiting Cheng Shuiyan and gifting him
5 millions of U.S. dollars and so as to start his | testify about that matter here today,
invoking his rights under the Fifth
5 |\n| 6 changing of the -- the turn of the event with me, | Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
6 |\n| 7 all these matters, I should start from the | 7 |\n| 8 beginning to tell you that. | Q. Are you refusing to answer?
8
THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, let me |\n| ರ | interpret everything that just happened.
ರ |\n| And also the contents involving
10 Cheng Shuiyan of defaming me on Twitter, this | Yes.
10
A. |\n| 11 platform, concerning about my family and calling | 11
Did you testify at a trial in that
Q. |\n| 12 me rapist and calling me a hooligan, calling me | 12 case? |\n| 13 low class, a peasant, and not even -- low class | 13
Yes.
A. |\n| 14 peasant and talking about me having a big deal | 14
Q. Did you testify that you paid Baosheng |\n| 15 with Xi Jinping, all of that, I would also like to | 15 Guo 42,000 dollars? |\n| 16 start to tell you that. | A. Well, Baosheng Guo was 2011 the
16 |\n| And also that I would like to
17 | 17 partner of Cheng Shuiyan in this whole business of |\n| 18 tell you about the matter that Cheng Shuiyan | 18 attacking me and the fact that he is one of the |\n| 19 talking about on Twitter in relation to writing to | 19 persons who attacked me together with Cheng |\n| 20 the ministry -- minister of or department head of | 20 Shuiyan the most. |\n| 21 DOJ and claiming that he is to -- they are going | MR. WOLMAN: I'm asking the court
21 |\n| 22 to deport me to China and telling that I was a | reporter, move to strike as nonresponsive.
22 |\n| 23 criminal and I was a wanted person, all these | Q. Did you testify that you paid, you
23 |\n| 24 matters, I would like to actually tell you about | 24 paid Baosheng Guo 42,000 dollars? |\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g868 dPage 48 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n47 (185 to 188)\n\n| | o onated on the round of some | | | |\n|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|----------------------------------------------------|--|\n| | 185
Q. Did you write a check to Baosheng Guo | | 187
MR. WOLMAN: I'm going to -- I'm | |\n| | | 2 | going to suspend the deposition at this | |\n| 2
for the various amounts he requested? | | 3 | point pending the issues regarding the | |\n| 3
I don't recall.
A. | | 4 | claims of Fifth Amendment privilege. | |\n| 4 | Q. How did money go from you to the -- | 5 | THE WITNESS: Thank you very much. | |\n| 5 | how did 42,000 dollars go from you to Baosheng | 6 | (Time noted: 6:16 p.m.) | |\n| 6
Guo? | | 7 | | |\n| 7 | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of counsel, | 8 | | |\n| 8 | Mr. Guo declines to respond to the question | | HOWAN KWOK | |\n| 9
invoking his rights under the Fifth | | 9 | | |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
10 | | 10 | Subscribed and sworn to | |\n| 11
Q. Are you refusing to answer? | | 11 | before me this
day | |\n| 12
A.
Yes. | | | 12 of MO
、2021. | |\n| 13 | Q. From whatever account or accounts that | 13 | | |\n| | 14 you used to pay Baosheng Guo, how much money is in | 14 | | |\n| 15 them now? | | ોર્ડ | | |\n| 16 | MR. GAVENMAN: On advice of Mr. Guo's | 16 | | |\n| 17 | counsel, Mr. Guo declines to respond to the | 17 | | |\n| 18 | question invoking his rights under the Fifth | 18 | | |\n| Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
19 | | 19 | | |\n| Q. Do you have any records of the
20 | | 20 | | |\n| 21 payments to Mr. Guo, Baosheng Guo? | | 21 | | |\n| 22
I don't recall.
A. | | 22 | | |\n| 23 | Q. Who would have records -- strike that. | 23 | | |\n| 24 | | 24 | | |\n| | Were records of those payments | 25 | | |\n| 25 introduced as evidence in the trial between you | | | | |\n| | 186 | | 188
INDEX: | |\n| and Baosheng Guo?
1 | | | WITNESS
EXAM BY:
PAGE: | |\n| 2
A. Yes. | | 2 | | |\n| 3
Q. Do you have control over those | | 3 | H. Kwok
Mr. Wolman
6 | |\n| 4
exhibits? | | 4 | | |\n| 5 | MR. GAVENMAN: Objection, objection | 5 | EXHIBIT INDEX: | |\n| 6
to form. | | 6 | DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
PAGE: | |\n| 7 | A. I am not quite sure I understand what | 7 | Exhibit 1 Amended Notice of Deposition
20 | |\n| 8
you mean. | | 8 | Exhibit 2 Defendant Wengui Guo's
23 | |\n| 9 | Q. Do you or your attorneys have copies | ் | Verified Statement Pursuant to | |\n| 10 of the exhibits introduced at the trial between | | 10 | Local Civil Rule 26.1 | |\n| 11 you and Baosheng Guo? | | | 11 Exhibit 3 document entitled \"Complaint\"
107 | |\n| 12 | A. I actually don't quite understand what | | 12 Exhibit 4 Complaint and Jury Demand
122 | |\n| 13 you -- what your question means. I don't | | | 13 Exhibit 5 Defendant Wengui Guo's Answer
122 | |\n| 14 understand. | | 14 | to the Complaint | |\n| ો ર
Q. What is Broadcasting Board of | | | 15 Exhibit 6 Defendant Wengui Guo's Initial 123 | |\n| 16 Governors? | | 16 | Disclosures | |\n| 17 | THE INTERPRETER: Counsel, is that a | | 17 Exhibit 7 Defendant Wengui Guo's
ો ટેરે | |\n| 18
company or is that -- | | 18 | Objections and Responses to | |\n| 19
MR. WOLMAN: A company. | | 19 | Plaintiff Logan Cheng's Second | |\n| 20 | THE INTERPRETER: It is a company? | 20 | Revised First Set of Requests | |\n| 21 | | | | |\n| | MR. WOLMAN: An entity. Yes. | 21 | for Production of Documents | |\n| 22 | A. I cannot understand exactly what this | 22 | | |\n| | | 23 | | |\n| 24 | 23 means. I don't understand this question at all.
THE INTERPRETER: Did we have any | 24 | | |\n| questions?
25 | | 25 | | |\n\n| | | | Conducted on April 1, 2021 |\n|------|-----------------------------------------|-----|----------------------------|\n| | | 189 | |\n| 1 | EXHIBIT INDEX: | | |\n| 2 | DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
PAGE: | | |\n| 3 | Exhibit 8 Defendant Wengui Guo's | 125 | |\n| | | | |\n| 4 | Objections and Answers to | | |\n| 5 | Plaintiff Logan Cheng's First | | |\n| 6 | Set of Interrogatories | | |\n| 7 | | | |\n| 8 | | | |\n| 9 | | | |\n| 10 | | | |\n| 11 | | | |\n| | | | |\n| 12 | | | |\n| 13 | | | |\n| 14 | | | |\n| ા ર | | | |\n| 1 Q | | | |\n| 17 | | | |\n| 18 | | | |\n| 19 | | | |\n| 20 | | | |\n| | | | |\n| 21 | | | |\n| 22 | | | |\n| 23 | | | |\n| 24 | | | |\n| 25 | | | |\n| | | 190 | |\n| l | CERTIFICATE | | |\n| 2 | STATE OF NEW JERSEY ) | | |\n| | )ss: | | |\n| 3 | COUNTY OF UNION | | |\n| 4 | I, MARY F. BOWMAN, a Registered | | |\n| 5 | Professional Reporter, Certified | | |\n| 6 | Realtime Reporter, and Notary Public | | |\n| 7 | within and for the States of New York | | |\n| 8 | and New Jersey, do hereby certify: | | |\n| 9 | That HOWAN KWOK, the witness | | |\n| 10 | whose deposition is hereinbefore set | | |\n| 11 | forth, was duly sworn by me and that | | |\n| 12 | such deposition is a true record of the | | |\n| 13 | testimony given by such witness. | | |\n| 14 | I further certify that I am not | | |\n| ાર | related to any of the parties to this | | |\n| 16 | action by blood or marriage and that I | | |\n| 17 | am in no way interested in the outcome | | |\n| 18 | of this matter. | | |\n| 19 | In witness whereof, I have | | |\n| 20 | hereunto set my hand this 2nd day of | | |\n| 21 | April, 2021. | | |\n| 22 | | | |\n| 23 | | | |\n| | MARY F. BOWMAN, RPR, CRR | | |\n| 24 | | | |\n| ટર્ડ | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/22/2113:56:18 0 dPage 50 of 92\n\naccounts 90:23, 94:12, 46:19, 48:10, A 96:20, 98:15, 49:15, 50:4, 50:24, 185:13 aaron accurate 101:20, 106:4, 67:12, 69:14, 35:6, 35:22, 72:23, 74:7, 110:11, 111:1, 6:22, 7:5, 35:23, 36:2, 111:2, 115:2, 75:16, 75:24, 66:12, 15:7, 36:7, 36:9, 115:8, 116:22, 76:12, 76:22, 74:6, 171:12, 36:10, 36:13, 122:11, 128:12, 90:1, 91:4, 171:20 36:16, 36:21, accurately 132:3, 133:12, 118:4, 119:8, 37:5 140:3, 145:18, 119:13, 119:23, 15:12, 126:10 ability 148:3, 148:14, 120:8, 120:14, accusation 5:17, 15:5, 153:7, 156:9, 130:7, 159:14, 131:16, 132:18 15:11, 34:12, 159:20, 161:20, 160:7, 161:9, accused 35:3 167:4, 168:20, 162:21, 163:3, 108:1, 112:1, able 169:6, 170:18, 169:15, 171:13, 112:6 17:11, 24:10, 173:23, 178:25, 171:23, 181:10, accusing 34:16, 37:3, 180:6, 182:24, 183:19, 185:7, 110:4 39:10, 39:13, 183:5, 183:6, 185:16 acknowledge 52:22, 53:1, 186:12 advise 5:5, 13:4 57:3, 82:11, adding 153:4 acknowledged 93:18, 122:3, 18:12 advising 144:22, 169:21 134:11, 137:4, address 122:3 acknowledging 137:7, 158:5, 8:10, 104:20 affects 41:13 158:10, 158:21, addresses 126:12 acquaintance 179:20 66:2 affiliated absolutely 107:13 addressing 31:18, 55:22, act 106:18, 154:2, 75:7 104:8, 107:10, 147:2 162:11 160:8, administer 155:10 abuse acted 4:16 affirm 86:25, 157:21, 180:4 183:12 5:14 admissibility accepting acting afield 5:8 30:7, 93:25 24:23, 39:17, admit 83:14 30:22, 31:6, action after 122:4 31:15, 74:19 15:22, 190:17 advice 21:14, 44:7, accompany active 53:14, 92:2, 12:7, 12:13, 134:10 14:7 12:19, 13:20, 92:3, 95:1, according activities 97:19, 24:18, 24:24, 104:16, 33:18, 178:16 91:25, 116:5 30:2, 30:8, 111:4, 111:8, account activity 30:23, 116:13, 145:13 30:18, 36:24, 36:25, 159:19 31:2, 31:7, afterward 57:11, 65:20, actual 31:11, 31:16, 87:11 65:23, 66:5, 114:23, 141:13 37:6, 37:11, afterwards 99:4, 104:7, actually 37:25, 38:6, 148:11 104:19, 146:20, 9:8, 34:9, 38:13, 38:18, again 151:6, 185:13 35:22, 57:25, 40:3, 40:17, 9:23, 20:7, accountant 58:15, 59:18, 41:4, 42:1, 26:22, 28:16, 38:25, 44:1 60:18, 66:2, 42:12, 44:11, 45:22, 46:1, accounting 73:21, 84:19, 45:10, 44:25, 49:7, 59:21, 43:15, 43:18 86:5, 86:9, 45:22, 46:9, 103:21, 112:22, 86:22, 88:13,\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 51 of KLMNOPQRSTUSRVWXYSZ[\\]^T\\_`NabVcSO\\deNfRcgQYgQO[LhNVO^ijQ 92\n\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36
Page 51 of
KLMNOPQRSTUSRVWXYSZ[\\]^T_`NabVcSO\\deNfRcgQYgQO[LhNVO^ijQ
92 | | | | | | |\n|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|--|--|\n| | !\"#\\$%&\"'()*+,*-#\\$.-*/ | | | | | |\n|
| 0*\\$12&)31*\\$4(\"'5678986
|
|
| :9 | | |\n| | | | | | | |\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 52 of QRSTUVWXYZ[YX\\]^\\_Y`abcdZefTgh\\iYUbjkTlXimW\\_mWUaRnT\\WdopW 92\n\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36
Page 52 of
QRSTUVWXYZ[YX\\]^_Y`abcdZefTgh\\iYUbjkTlXimW_mWUaRnT\\WdopW
92 | | | | | | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|------------------------------|----|--|--|\n| '()*+,(-./01203)*4305 | | | | | | |\n| | 60*78,/970*:.(-;<=>?>< | | | @< | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
!
| \"
| %
\" | | | |\n|
|
| \"
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
| \"
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
&
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
| \"
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
&
| | | |\n|
|
|
\\$\"
|
| | | |\n|
|
| \"
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
|
|
| | | |\n|
|
\"# |
|
&
| | | |\n|
| | | \"
| | | |\n| | AB:CD'EDAFG
HHHIJKKIKLMLNOOOIAB:CD'EDAFGI6FP | | | | | |\n| | | | | | | |\n| | | | | | | |\n| | | | | | | |\n| | | | | | | |\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 53 of RSTUVWXYZ[\\ZY]^\\_`Zabcde[fgUhi]jZVcklUmYjnX`nXVbSoU]peqrX 92\n\n- -- - --- - - - - - -- ---- - - - - - - - - - -- - ! - ! - ! -- -- -- --- ---- -- --- - - - --- - - - - -- --- - --- - - - - - - \" -- -- -- - --- - - - -- - - - # - - # - #\\$ -- - % & - - --- -- & & -- ' # - - - - --- - ---- - -\n -- - --- -- --- - -- # - - - -\n\n### ()\\*+,-)./012314\\*+5416 71+89-0:81+;/).<=>?@?= A?\n\n### BC;DE(FEBGH IIIJKLLJLMNMOPPPJBC;DE(FEBGHJ7GQ\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012022113:56:1864 dPade 54 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\nbased 149:22, 150:19, 95:3, 96:21, benefit 150:25, 153:25, 97:5, 99:24, 173:19 5:9, 46:2, 57:7, 72:17, 154:4, 154:9, 106:3, 107:5, benefited 156:9, 158:22, 107:21, 90:14, 103:12, 107:25, 174:2 164:21, 165:18, 108:1, 108:6, 130:15, 130:20, beside 153:11 166:17, 168:11, 108:8, 127:6, 33:23 basic 174:9, 177:13, 128:11, 149:15, best 57:19 177:18 154:16, 163:9, 5:17, 19:5, basically been 183:17, 187:12 34:16, 35:3. 9:14, beqin 98:3 6:3, 41:3 11:19, 127:12 basis 12:1, bethesda 13:23, 14:1, beginning 45:15, 75:1, 3:14 14:4, 15:14, 134:14, 182:8 84:10, 162:16 betraying 15:17, 20:12, begins bates 108:3 40:23, 57:8, 22:8 160:10, 171:10 better 57:18, 62:12, behalf bathroom 116:3, 116:4 66:19, 79:18, 30:14, 30:17, 101:25, 102:6, between 79:20, 84:14, 37:2, 36:8, 154:13 4 : 4 , 6:22, 85:12, 86:12, bearing 37:5, 39:3, 13:15, 13:17, 87:9, 91:2, 39:8, 47:18, 88:13, 132:25 17:12, 20:13, 95:2, 96:3, 51:5, 70:5, because 25:17, 32:3. 96:20, 97:6, 168:18, 173:4, 6:15, 9:7, 55:9, 100:10, 100:25, 110:3, 179:8 9:13, 9:14, 144:6, 144:15, 111:7, 110:4, behavior 16:17, 17:6, 156:9, 156:10, 111:19, 111:25, 96:23 18:10, 20:12, 157:14, 166:23, 113:4, 113:5, being 24:11, 25:25, 167:9, 173:12, 113:18, 113:21, 12:16, 13:21, 26:7, 32:2, 173:24, 175:1, 114:12, 116:12, 20:21, 20:24, 34:4, 34:11, 177:1, 182:2. 118:13, 116:13, 21:3, 57:14, 36:23, 53:14, 185:25, 186:10 120:6, 122:22, 78:4, 78:5, 53:22, 54:15, beyond 124:12, 133:25, 95:5, 98:1, 55:11, 56:15, 79:24 134:1, 135:24, 99:17, 100:7, 58:19, 59:21, bhattacharya 138:7, 147:1, 103:12, 108:1, 77:16, 77:19, 3:11 149:14, 153:18, 110:4, 110:12, 77:25, 86:11, biden's 154:12, 154:14, 86:19, 93:15, 113:20, 115:19, 34:20 174:4 144:12, 147:19, 94:18, 96:11, big before 98:1, 98:10, 148:1, 148:8, 182:14 2:9, 4:15, 149:22, 167:20, 99:15, 99:22, bill 4:18, 8:5, 8:6, 171:21, 173:5, 107:23, 109:25, 51:11, 56:5, 11:13, 15:1, 176:12 112:12, 113:3, 62:21 16:21, 17:16, bejing 113:13, 114:4, billion 17:19, 17:22, 115:25, 118:18, 92:20, 93:4, 108:4, 130:21, 20:11, 22:22, 182:4 128:19, 129:2, 146:2, 146:19, 23:3, 24:7, 129:10, believe 129:11, 159:25, 160:19 24:12, 24:13, 129:20, 131:8, 24:2, 28:17, billionaire 29:1, 25:7, 132:11, 37:20, 111:14, 132:17, 162:20 44:7, 55:14, 133:7, 139:20, 127:16, 178:4, bills 56:6, 59:2, 145:19, 148:5, 178:22 29:12, 29:17,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 55 of PQRSTUVWXYZXW[\\]^X\\_`abcYdeSfg[hXTaijSkWhlV^lVT`QmS[[cnoV 92\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n-\n\n--\n\n- - -- - - !\" - -- ! !\" - ! -- -- ! -- ! - # - ! - - - - - --\n\n- - - -\n-\n - - - - - - -- - -\n- \\$ % -- - -- - -- --- -- - - - - - -\n- - \\$ \\$ \\$! -- - &'()\\*+',-./01/2()32/4 5/)67+.86/)9-',:;<=>=; ?@\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012022113:56:18 6 0 Page 56 of 92\n\n11:14, 11:25 174:21, 174:25, 88:5, 95:7, 181:18, 183:1, care 175:22, 175:23, 114:18, 114:24, 183:9 116:1, 129:22 110:19, 126:18, 176:5, 176:16, changed 177:14, 127:10, 148:23 177:12, ccp's 9:15, 98:2 178:14, 178:16, careful 53:22, 78:1 changes 179:4, 179:21, cell 55:7 183:3 179:23, 180:3, carrier 59:6, 59:7, changing 60:13, 60:24 183:22, 184:12 61:14, 62:7, 94:4, 182:6 cases 62:18, case 62:21, chao 8:1, 14:11, 97:5, 97:7, 91:19 13:5, 8:4, 14:17, 14:19, 97:22, 98:2, 14:20, 15:2, character 14:23, 78:3, 98:4, 98:6, 16:21, 16:24, 9:9 153:7, 154:17, 98:8, 98:9, 16:25, 17:1, charged 154:20, 154:24, 98:15, 17:2, 21:4, 98:16, 15:18, 66:20 163:10, 163:11, 98:18, 98:25, 26:19, 27:4, check 167:6, 168:6, 36:8, 37:19, 99:1, 99:16, 58:16. 58:21, 168:9, 168:17, 100:2, 100:3, 43:9, 47:15, 88:4, 98:23, 168:22, 168:24, 100:7, 100:6, 47:18, 47:21, 179:12, 180:8, 169:9, 169:6, 100:8, 104:10, 48:1, 48:5, 180:12, 180:17, 169:11, 172:14, 77:18, 77:21, 104:14, 104:16, 180:23, 185:1 172:15, 172:25, 104:23, 104:24, 78:14, 80:18, checks 180:1 105:3, 105:7, 80:21, 80:22, 181:3 caught 113:20, 128:9, 81:5, 81:9, chen 100:21 128:10 83:15, 83:22, 152:7 84:18, 86:13, cause cellular cheng 150:7 60:3, 60:5 87:3, 87:17, 1:4, 6:10, caused centimeters 93:5, 93:10, 15:22, 30:10, 96:19, 111:3, 131:7, 132:11, 60:25 49:12, 31:19, 111:8, 111:10, 136:4, 146:24, certain 51:25, 77:18, 111:15, 111:17, 149:4, 149:13, 6:24, 43:11, 78:14, 80:18, 149:21, 111:20, 111:22, 151:2, 122:4, 125:15, 82:15, 82:19, 153:12, 112:13, 112:14, 151:5, 166:11, 166:12, 86:13, 87:10, 113:6, 113:8, 153:16, 154:4, 166:13 91:10, 92:7, 113:18, 113:24, 154:10 certainly 92:12, 92:13, 114:13, 114:17, caution 74:22, 109:20 92:21, 92:25, 121:6, 120:4, 16:5, 20:7, certainty 93:5, 93:8, 121:22, 123:4, 26:8, 25:4, 57:4 93:12, 93:19, 26:22, 28:15, 126:3, 139:4, certificate 94:3, 94:5, 139:8, 142:23, 31:24, 52:1, 190:1 94:6, 94:12. 143:12, 145:13, 68:22, 69:20, certified 94:22, 95:6, 146:14, 146:15, 103:22, 122:6, 2:10, 117:13, 95:25, 96:12, 147:5, 153:23, 142:25, 143:24, 190:6 96:16, 96:19, 154:3, 155:11, 163:12, 151:21, certify 96:23, 97:19, 155:17, 170:25, 173:22, 174:3 190:9, 190:15 97:25, 99:2, 171:2, 171:4, ccp chair 100:14, 101:4, 171:6, 172:4, 77:17, 77:20, 21:24 103:19, 107:2. 172:10, 172:17, 77:23, 78:1. change 107:19, 107:24, 173:5, 173:20, 78:10, 78:15, 109:6, 110:3, 19:20, 98:4,\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\nરેરે\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 57 of LMNOPQRSTUVTSWXYZT[\\]^\\_U`aObcWdTP]efOgSdhRZhRP\\MiOWY\\_jkR 92\n\n| Case 22-50073 | Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
LMNOPQRSTUVTSWXYZT[\\]^_U`aObcWdTP]efOgSdhRZhRP\\MiOWY_jkR
92 | Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 | Page 57 of | |\n|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------|----|\n| | \"#\\$%&'#()*+,-+.\\$%/.+0 | | | |\n| | 1+%23'*42+%5)#(6789:97 | | | ;< |\n|
|
|
! |
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
! |
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
| |
| |\n|
| |
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
! |
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
| |
| | |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n| |
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
| | | | |\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZ31KPFileDd3/119/02/113722113:56:1868 dPage 58 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| comment | 56:23, 57:4, | computer | consolidate |\n|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------|-----------------------------------|\n| 161:11, 161:16 | 57:9, 57:15, | 97:5,
97:7, | 168 : 7 |\n| commit | 65:25, 82:24, | 98:7,
98:13, | consolidated |\n| 75:3 | 83:4, 86:16, | 98:14, 128:5, | 168 : 7 |\n| committed | 91:22, 92:17, | 128:6, 128:22, | conspired |\n| 38:8, 41:15, | 111:16, 115:12, | 129:9, 129:15 | 114:19, 116:1 |\n| 66:19, 67:3, | 116:5, 131:10, | concept | conspiring |\n| 73:23, 73:25, | 131:11, 161:15 | 101:23 | 94:13 |\n| 74:3, 74:12 | companies | concern | constantly |\n| common | 12:2, 160:3, | 148:23 | 108:22, 134:5, |\n| 82:23, 83:4 | 160:5, 161:1, | concerning | 136:3 |\n| communicate | 161:3, 161:18 | 156:9, 182:11 | constitution |\n| 63:22,
64:8, | company | concluded | 12:22,
12:10, |\n| 83:9, 179:25 | 24:15, 24:17, | 174:5 | 24:22, 27:19, |\n| communicated | 102:17, 122:4, | condition | 27:25, 28:14, |\n| 173:12 | 186:18, 186:19, | 126:12, 127:20 | 28:24, 29:3, |\n| communication | 186:20 | conditions | 30:6,
30:21, |\n| 16:12, 16:14, | comparison | 15:5, 126:8 | 31:5, 31:14, |\n| 83:25,
83:23, | 153:16 | conducted | 37:10,
38:4, |\n| 84:2, 90:15, | complaint | 148:14, 153:14 | 38:17, 39:22, |\n| 90:18, 103:13, | 16:20, 17:5, | confer | 40:6, 40:20, |\n| 143:2, 144:15, | 17:16, 17:19, | 7:9, 148:4, | 42:5,
41:8, |\n| 163:15, 164:1, | 17:20, 17:22, | 148:7, 148:9, | 42:15, 44:14, |\n| 164:3, 164:6, | 18:5, 103:19, | 148:11, 148:13 | 45:13,
45:3, |\n| 164:10, 166:14, | 106:2, 106:23, | conference | 46:1,
46:12, |\n| 166:20, 176:17 | 107:1, 107:22, | 79:14 | 46:22,
48:13, |\n| communications | 113:5, 113:22, | confirming | 49:18,
50:7, |\n| 16:7, 19:16, | 114:13, 121:2, | 58:13 | 67:16,
67:21, |\n| 20:9, 25:6, | 121:6, 121:18, | confused | 74:10, 75:19, |\n| 26:10, 26:23, | 121:21, 132:5, | 47:8, 99:22, | 76:2, 76:15, |\n| 28:17, 28:20, | 174:19, 183:12, | 168:11 | 76:25,
90:4, |\n| 31:23, 31:25, | 188:11, 188:12, | connect | 91:7, 118:8, |\n| 41:10, 45:7, | 188:14 | 64:22, 65:14, | 119:11, 119:16, |\n| 45:18, 52:2, | complaints | 129:8, 129:9 | 120:1, 120:11, |\n| 69:9,
68:24, | 151:24 | connected | 120:17, 130:10, |\n| 69:10, 69:21, | complete | 65:11,
64:24, | 159:17, 159:23, |\n| 69:24, 70:7, | 136:17, 136:18,
137:3, 137:5, | 129:1, 129:3, | 161:23, 162:24,
163:6, 169:18, |\n| 73:1, 73:8, | 137:7 | 129:4, 129:15 | 171:16, 172:1, |\n| 90:22, 92:3, | completed | connecting | 181:13, 184:6, |\n| 103:15, 103:23,
104:1, 105:23, | 136:24 | 129:15 | 185:10, 185:19 |\n| 122:7, 144:1, | completely | connection | consultant |\n| 144:2, 152:1, | 72:10, 84:13, | 47:2, 64:21, | 12:1, 150:10, |\n| 152:4, 164:23, | 89:2, 112:15 | 67:1, 67:10, | 150:15, 150:16 |\n| 165:5, 165:9, | complicated | 67:19, 69:5, | consulting |\n| 165:12, 166:23, | 54:14 | 69:17, 105:1, | 43:18 |\n| 167:4 | complies | 172:15, 173:1, | contact |\n| communist | 60:10 | 178:14 | 56:16, 56:17, |\n| 12:4, 53:23, | | consider | |\n| | | 115:13, 115:14 | |\n| | | | |\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 59 of NOPQRSTUVWXVUYZ[\\V]^\\_`aWbcQdeYfVR\\_ghQiUfjT\\jTR^OkQYlamlT 92\n\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36
Page 59 of
NOPQRSTUVWXVUYZ[\\V]^_`aWbcQdeYfVR_ghQiUfjT\\jTR^OkQYlamlT
92 | | | | |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| | \\$%&'()%*+,-./-0&'10-2 | | | |\n| | | | | |\n|
| 3-'45),64-'7+%*89:;<;9
|
!
!
|
#
| => |\n|
|
| \"
|
| |\n\n### ?@7AB\\$CB?DE >>>FGHHFHIJIKLLLF?@7AB\\$CB?DEF3DM\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 60 of NOPQRSTUVWXVUYZ[\\V]^\\_`aWbcQdeYfVR\\_ghQiUfjT\\jTR^OkQZUalmT 92\n\n| Case 22-50073 | Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22 | Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 | Page 60 of | |\n|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|------------------|----|\n| | NOPQRSTUVWXVUYZ[\\V]^_`aWbcQdeYfVR_ghQiUfjT\\jTR^OkQZUalmT
92 | | | |\n| | #\\$%&'(\\$)*+,-.,/%&0/,1 | | | |\n| | 2,&34(+53,&6*\\$)789:;:8 | | | <= |\n|
| | | | |\n|
|
| | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | |
| |\n|
| |
|
| |\n|
|
| | | |\n| | |
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n| | | | | |\n|
| |
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n|
|
| |
| |\n|
| | |
| |\n|
| |
|
| |\n| |
| |
| |\n|
|
| |
| |\n|
|
| |
| |\n| |
|
| | |\n| |
| | | |\n| |
|
|
| |\n| |
| | | |\n|
| |
| | |\n| |
| | ! | |\n| |
|
|
| |\n|
| |
|
| |\n| | | | | |\n| |
| | | |\n| | | |
| |\n|
| | | | |\n|
| | | \" | |\n| |
| | | |\n|
| |
|
| |\n| | | |
| |\n|
|
|
| | |\n| | |
|
| |\n|
|
| | | |\n|
|
| | | |\n|
|
| | \" | |\n|
|
|
|
| |\n| |
|
|
| |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n\n## >?6@A#BA>CD EEEFGHHFHIJIKLLLF>?6@A#BA>CDF2CM\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/10/02/254Enteried003/113:56:161 of age 61 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 128:17, 128:18, | discontinued | document | 120:20, 122:18, |\n|------------------|------------------|----------------------------------|-------------------|\n| 128:23, 128:24, | 173:6, 173:8 | 3:19, 18:16, | 123:10, 124:4, |\n| 129:2, 129:13 | discourse | 18:25, 22:8, | 125:11, 127:24, |\n| devices | 6:22 | 22:13, 22:18, | 128:1, 128:2, |\n| 102:22, 128:5 | discovery | 22:21, 23:3, | 132:25, 137:10, |\n| diagnosed | 170:12 | 24:6, 25:2, | 139:2, 139:6, |\n| 127:19 | discuss | 32:23, 32:25, | 139:8, 139:10, |\n| difference | 82:14, 83:21 | 33:2, 33:5, | 139:17, 140:5, |\n| 17:12 | discussed | 33:11, 33:13, | 140:7, 140:11, |\n| different | 19:13, 20:13, | 33:17, 106:5, | 140:24, 142:4, |\n| 11:14, 16:17, | 80:17,
80:21, | 106:15, 106:21, | 142:8, 142:9, |\n| 41:19, 118:16, | 81:4, 81:9, | 106:22,
107:4, | 142:11, 142:15, |\n| 128:10, 159:2 | 157:20, 160:9, | 112:25, 120:24, | 142:22, 142:24, |\n| dime | 163:21, 165:18, | 121:1, 121:10, | 143:11, 143:21, |\n| 173:20 | 175:23, 176:5 | 121:14, 121:16, | 144:9, 145:23, |\n| ding | discusses | 121:23, 122:2, | 147:5, 147:12, |\n| 92:12,
91:18, | 159:24, 160:1 | 122:10, 122:21, | 147:16, 147:23, |\n| 92:19,
93:3, | discussing | 122:23, 123:5, | 148:17, 154:23, |\n| 113:11, 182:2 | 17:3, 178:6 | 123:8, 123:13, | 178:14, 188:21 |\n| dinner | discussion | 123:16, 124:6, | doing |\n| 134:15 | 163:19 | 124:7, 124:10, | 21:2,
60:19, |\n| direct | discussions | 124:14, 125:9, | 61:11, 61:16, |\n| 10:17, 43:1, | 166:11 | 125:17, 125:20, | 61:23,
67:25, |\n| 92:3 | dishonesty | 126:16, 126:25, | 84:14,
85:8, |\n| directed | 15:15, 15:19 | 128:3, 133:4, | 116:4,
85:23, |\n| 53:9 | dismiss | 133:7, 135:16, | 117:15, 117:16, |\n| directly | 173:19 | 135:22, 135:23, | 136:16, 143:3, |\n| 51:18, 161:17 | dismissed | 136:8,
135:25, | 151:10 |\n| director | 172:17, 174:7, | 136:21, 136:23, | doj |\n| 39:14 | 175:3 | 137:1, 137:15, | 110:16, 110:17, |\n| directors | displayed | 137:24, 139:23, | 135:18, 135:24, |\n| 39:19 | 100:3, 100:6 | 140:2, 140:4, | 135:25,
140:3, |\n| directs | displaying | 141:1, 142:2, | 144:18, 182:21 |\n| 6:25 | 106:21, 122:22 | 159:24, 172:20, | dollar |\n| disagree | dispose | 172:24, 188:11 | 132:13, 146:2, |\n| 69:11 | 99:11, 103:2, | documents | 178:17, 180:23, |\n| disappeared | 103:5 | 20:14, 24:12, | 181:8 |\n| 57:17, 57:23, | disposed | 42:25, 54:16, | dollars |\n| 95:3, 95:4, | 99:21, 100:12 | 54:17, 54:19, | 93:2, 108:3, |\n| 116:13, 134:12, | disruption | 54:24, 55:8, | 115:6, 130:22, |\n| 145:14, 146:23 | 154:10 | 96:22, 97:3, | 131:3, 132:4, |\n| disappointment | district | 97:4, 97:9, | 146:18, 146:19, |\n| 120:18 | 1:1, 1:2, 6:11, | 97:10, 98:6,
98:17, 99:2, | 147:1, 150:23, |\n| disclosures | 6:12, 155:23, | | 159:25, 160:19, |\n| 117:2, 122:25, | 155:24, 169:25, | 99:6, 100:13, | 173:17, 178:20, |\n| 123:3, 188:16 | 178:10, 180:24, | 100:24, 100:25, | 178:23, 179:13, |\n| discontinuance | 180:25 | 101:2, 103:8,
103:18, 111:10, | 179:18, 180:18, |\n| 172:13 | docket | | 182:5, 183:14, |\n| | 178:16 | | |\n| | | | |\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012022113:56:18 6/2 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n183:16, 184:15, 154:21 emphasize 17:21, 18:12, 184:24, 185:5 earlier 34:5, 34:12, 112:23, 123:8 done 14:10, 39:21, 47:8, 52:21, emphasized 52:22, 52:23, 20:10, 53:24, 89:17, 99:15, 108:6 78:24, 79:2, 79:18, 81:24, 126:7, 156:1. employed 107:5, 112:25, 87:10, 110:20, 178:6, 180:15 11:25, 32:7, 120:19, easier 113:1, 122:18, 145:10, 55:24, 91:2 146:10, 151:25, 148:20 123:8, 123:9, employee 128:20, 128:21 154:1 eastern 91:17, 39:10, enormous door 169:13, 178:10, 92:12, 93:14, 153:18 110:23 180:24 94:6, 96:14, down enough easy 97:20, 97:25, 10:18, 85:19, 130:22, 12:3, 138:25 101:9, 108:13, 133:12, 138:7, 22:23, 23:1, education 108:17, 109:3, 63:16, 123:11, 138:25 89:20 109:7, 110:17, 157:15 113:12, ensure effect 114:9, 6:21, 7:4, downloading 131:13, 132:24, 4 : 1 7 43:3 120:20 135:1, 135:2, effort downstairs 135:18, 144:17, entered 91:24 145:15, 36:7 54:23 146:8, efforts 149:21, 149:24, entire drinking 102:25 153:17, 181:22 88:2, 99:18 76:5, 115:4 eight drive employees entirely 81:17 3:5 57:16, 57:21, 172:10 69:11, either 96:12 entitled driver's 9:18, 12:25, employment 10:1 106:22, 120:6, 13:12, 53:2, 12:2, 89:24 160:17, 188:11 duly 74:19, 80:12, empty entity 190:12 6:3, 80:18, 80:19, 65:10 57:9, 186:21 duplicated 97:17, 98:2, encouragement entrepreneur 9:14 107:4, 122:17, 91:24 during 142:10, 161:17, 171:11 end 177:22 equivalent 21:2, 94:24, 92:18, 110:1, electronic 34:13 98:22, 98:24, 100:5, 107:1, 172:21, 127:12 100:9, erased endorse 101:6, 105:21, 174:25 134:11 105:24, 134:15, eliang 180:23 escape 155:6 151:16 enemy 129:21 elicit 57:16, 78:2, esq E 115:11, 115:13, 72:25 3:7, 3:8, 3:15 e-mail eliminating 115:15 establish 65:20, 65:22, engaged 82:24, 83:4 25:7, 93:21 65:23, 65:24, 156:13, 156:16 elliott established 66:2, 66:3, engaging 78:4 71:17, 90:5, 66:5, 104:19, ellis 148:4 148:16 105:2 english 179:10, 179:14 estimate each 5:15, 5:16, else 157:23 6:16, 105:3, 17:7, 6:19, estimated 80:22, 82:6, 108:5, 108:8, 17:8, 17:15, 112:1 136:5\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/09/22/2113:56:18 63 dPage 63 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\n62\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021 ethnicity 147:2, 183:23, 121:15, 121:17, 158:6 185:25 122:2, 122:22, faces 158:19, 159:2, 159:8 exact 122:24, 123:23, 158:7 123:24, 123:25, evaluated 70:25 fact 124:21, 127:22, 153:9, exactly 78:9, 153:11 78:20, 188:5, 188:7, evaluation 77:17, 77:22, 87:9, 91:15, 188:8, 188:11, 95:3, 97:1, 153:13 78:10, 88:4, even 95:25, 96:1, 188:12, 188:13, 97:8, 97:22, 188:15, 188:17, 52:25, 101:13, 109:5, 97:24, 98:21, 6:18, 142:19, 189:1, 189:3 113:7, 104:15, 110:9, 54:18, 65:25, exhibits 165:22, 177:9, 110:13, 111:19, 71:16, 78:21, 186:4, 186:10 186:22 113:25, 114:16, 86:22, 100:23, exist exam 115:9, 154:14, 116:3, 146:18, 60:6 169:5, 153:16, 156:19, 188:2 160:6, examination expect 184:18 166:17, 172:10, 180:6, 182:13 6:5 164:18 facts expensive 122:5, 153:12 event example 92:22 factual 34:7, 182:6 34:19, ever 56:4, 87:13, explain 94:18, 115:9 faith 7:16, 144:14, 144:16, 137:22 11:21, 144:25, 14:12, 145:25, explaining 131:1, 131:21, 32:24, 146:1, 151:3, 132:21, 52:9, 52:12, 106:13 146:15, 63:13, 65:23, 156:23 explanation 147:2, 153:22, excellent 154:2 65:24, 66:3, 137:25 66:19, 116:25, 139:13, false 69:16, exploring 140:16 46:7, 70:3, 91:2, 85:1 46:16, 102:9, 102:16, except 46:25, 67:9. exposing 103:4, 105:6, 4:9 71:5, 71:6, 88:9 123:5, 138:21, 73:9, 183:13 exception extends 138:23, 161:17, familiar 42:19 164:2 169:3, 180:17, 8:21, 15:21, excess extent 180:22 17:8, 23:8, 132:3 31:21, 69:22, every 43:15, 47:5, exchange 90:14, 90:17, 24:11, 21:1, 48:17, 111:17, 93:14, 173:5 103:11, 103:24, 59:22, 98:3, 160:21, 177:2 excuse 104:3, 122:8, 98:4, 101:9, family 114:22, 130:3, 130:5, 130:11, 129:21, 129:24 66:18, 67:3, 133:17, 133:18, 144:2, 151:22, everybody 77:7, 78:19, 133:19 152:2, 153:2, 55:22, 55:24 86:15, 86:21, executed 163:13, 163:25, everyone 87:4, 87:14, 14:4, 24:3 164:4, 166:8, 57:20 101:8, 101:12, exhibit 166:10, 167:7, 114:7, 131:6, everything 173:10 18:21, 18:23, 182:11 65:10, 66:11, 19:2, 19:8. F family's 184:9 22:11, 22:14, fabricated 108:21, 131:8 evidence 32:20, 33:14, 66:1, 111:15, 96:15, 113:4, far 106:20, 106:22, 132:25, 133:6 57:13, 83:14, 113:18, 114:23, 112:20, 112:24, face 105:20, 161:7 144:16, 146:16, 120:25, 121:2, 132:4, 156:23,\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFileDd3/119/2254 EnteFieedO301133221137569164 of 92\n\n| fatal | 50:13, 50:19, | filibuster | 120:19, 176:20 |\n|------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|\n| 113:8 | 67:21,
67:14, | 134:24 | first |\n| fathom | 67:24,
74:9, | filibustering | 26:2, 36:21, |\n| 151:6 | 74:20, 74:23, | 109:21, 109:22, | 55:16, 80:3, |\n| fear | 75:3, 75:6, | 134:23, 136:19 | 94:17, 101:3, |\n| 108:23, 131:7, | 75:18, 76:1, | filing | 109:14, 124:3, |\n| 131:15, 132:16, | 76:14, 76:24, | 4:6, 168:22 | 124:8, 124:23, |\n| 150:7 | 79:17,
90:3, | filings | 125:2, 152:6, |\n| february | 90:11, 90:19, | 39:8 | 153:6, 169:3, |\n| 154:18, 163:10 | 91:6, 118:7, | filling | 172:6, 188:20, |\n| federal | 118:13, 119:10, | 66:14 | 189:5 |\n| 12:18, 38:22, | 119:15, 119:25, | filthy | fiscal |\n| 43:21,
40:10, | 120:10, 120:16, | 134:9 | 42:11 |\n| 44:10, 67:10 | 130:10, 153:4, | finance | fit |\n| federally | 159:17, 159:22, | 120:13 | 28:10 |\n| 9:18 | 161:22, 162:1, | financial | five |\n| fee | 162:3, 162:23, | 43:18 | 7:21,
14:11, |\n| 36:12, 48:1, | 163:5, 169:17, | financing | 15:17, 40:23, |\n| 48:5, 49:4, | 171:15, 171:25, | 175:21 | 41:25, 157:4, |\n| 51:16 | 180:10, 181:12, | find | 157:14 |\n| feel | 184:5, 185:9, | 56:8, 58:17, | five-minute |\n| 86:11,
86:19, | 185:18, 187:4 | 62:20, 78:12, | 102:6 |\n| 88:11, 180:1 | fifty-nine | 85:6, 101:2, | fix |\n| feeling | 170:11 | 116:22, 116:23, | 71:1 |\n| 86:18 | fiqured | 117:17, 140:24, | floor |\n| female | 141:12 | 145:22, 160:7, | 22:3, 180:10 |\n| 158:14, 158:23, | file | 177:19, 177:21, | folks |\n| 159:1 | 40:10, 42:25, | 179:2, 179:20 | 180:15 |\n| few | 43:3, 44:4, | finds | follow |\n| 105:14, 105:20 | 174:21 | 79:19 | 136:14 |\n| fifth | filed | fine | follows |\n| 12:9, 12:21, | 15:24, 16:2, | 102:1, 117:15, | 6:4 |\n| 13:10, 24:21, | 16:21, 17:17, | 154:11, 164:20 | force |\n| 27:18, 27:24, | 17:19, 17:23, | finished | 4 : 1 7 |\n| 28:13, 28:23, | 43:23, 102:4, | 95:20, 109:11, | forensic |\n| 29:2, 29:8, | 106:3, 107:1, | 127:16, 133:22, | 102:17 |\n| 30:5, 30:20, | 107:5, 107:22, | 133:23 | form |\n| 31:4,
31:13, | 121:21, 123:3, | fire | 4:10,
8:23, |\n| 37:9,
38:3, | 154:17, 163:10, | 99:18 | 9:17,
9:23, |\n| 38:16, 39:22, | 163:11, 163:23,
167:6, 168:12, | firm | 10:4, 14:13, |\n| 40:5, 40:19, | 168:17, 168:24, | 37:14, 37:18, | 18:2,
18:7, |\n| 41:7, 41:17, | 169:7, 169:9, | 37:24, 43:16, | 23:12, 23:23, |\n| 42:4, 42:14, | 169:11, 169:19, | 43:18, 47:5, | 24:8, 25:12, |\n| 44:13, 45:2, | 171:21, 172:13, | 47:15, 48:1, | 25:16, 26:22, |\n| 45:12, 45:25, | 172:20, 174:13, | 49:5, 49:8, | 27:8, 27:14, |\n| 46:11, 46:21, | 178:9, 181:5 | 49:10, 56:2, | 27:20, 29:6, |\n| 48:12, 49:17, | files | 101:17, 101:21, | 29:14, 32:22, |\n| 50:6, 50:11, | 38:22 | 102:3, 107:11, | 33:25, 34:3, |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n63\n\n### Case 22:5007:20-DoO516231KPFiledd03/119/2254Enteried003113722113:569865 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 34:17, 43:13, | 119:20 | fully | qenerally |\n|----------------------------------|----------------------------------|---------------------|-------------------------|\n| 44:5, 48:23, | four | 122:2 | 19:17, 19:21 |\n| 49:2, 56:9, | 14:16, 147:8, | function | generate |\n| 56:13, 56:20, | 154:17, 163:10, | 104:25, 129:7 | 49:25 |\n| 57:24,
64:10, | 167:6, 168:9, | fund | gentleman |\n| 66:14,
80:6, | 169:6, 169:9, | 57:5 | 173:16 |\n| 87:15,
92:4, | 169:11 | fundamental | georgetown |\n| 104:9, 104:21, | frame | 71:21, 137:3 | 3:13 |\n| 107:15, 112:21, | 112:17 | funded | geteer |\n| 115:23, 119:19, | frank | 56:23, 56:25 | 58:7,
58:11, |\n| 129:4, 129:18, | 170:22 | funds | 58:22,
58:12, |\n| 138:1, 139:5, | fraud | 51:2, 176:23 | 97:21, 101:1, |\n| 139:15, 139:18, | 41:3,
45:9, | funny | 150:3 |\n| 140:18, 142:17, | 45:21, 73:24, | 39:17 | getting |\n| 143:18, 144:13, | 74:1, 74:3, | further | 51:2,
53:13, |\n| 145:24, 150:24, | 74:12 | 4 : 8 ,
4 : 13 , | 72:8,
72:23, |\n| 154:19, 155:8, | fraudulent | 11:4,
90:6, | 78:11, 126:23, |\n| 156:7, 156:18, | 96:22 | 157:15, 190:15 | 173:20 |\n| 158:15, 160:11, | free | ர | gift |\n| 160:12, 161:4, | 16:12, 122:9, | g-e-t | 93:2 |\n| 172:23, 173:21, | 144:4, 152:4, | 59:3 | qifting |\n| 173:22, 175:25, | 163:17, 164:6, | g-e-t-e-e-r | 182:4 |\n| 180:3, 180:4,
180:19, 180:20, | 165:6, 166:9, | 58:21, 58:23 | gifts |\n| 186:6 | 168:3, 173:13 | g-u-o | 92:22 |\n| formal | freedom | 8:21, 9:7, | girlfriend |\n| 83:6 | 92:14, 92:24, | 16:3, 17:12, | 81:8 |\n| formally | 94:21, 109:4 | 18:5 | girls |\n| 5:3 | freezing | gang | 54:23 |\n| formed | 159:25 | 91:18,
92:12, | give |\n| 163:25 | friend | 92:19,
93:3, | 15:6,
5:15, |\n| forth | 87:5, 87:21 | 113:11, 182:2 | 43:2,
62:6, |\n| 54:21, 55:2, | friends | gauge | 68:20, 123:15, |\n| 93:24, 144:21, | 54:25, 86:15, | 149:12 | 134:20, 139:13, |\n| 157:23, 183:23, | 86:21,
87:14
front | gauging | 139:17, 140:25, |\n| 190:12 | | 150:13 | 142:12, 142:15, |\n| forward | 53:1, 105:17,
123:10, 123:16, | gave | 155:1, 177:23,
178:1 |\n| 86:1, 111:4, | 123:18, 128:12, | 14:10, 70:1, | given |\n| 111:11, 111:15, | 128:16 | 115:25, 116:2, | 9:12, 9:15, |\n| 112:14, 113:6, | frozen | 140:22, 141:6, | 11:22, 14:25, |\n| 153:22 | 160:19 | 178:2, 183:14 | 93:1, 93:16, |\n| forwarded | fugitive | gavenman's | 115:5, 181:16, |\n| 133:25, 134:2 | 160:18 | 51:16, 51:18, | 190:14 |\n| found | full | 158:6 | gives |\n| 127:6, 177:13, | 101:8, 112:15, | general | 136:11 |\n| 177:15, 177:18, | 131:1, 131:17, | 7:1, 26:12, | giving |\n| 180:6 | 132:17, 132:21, | 26:15, 141:9, | 96:21,
97:2, |\n| foundation | 159:4 | 142:10 | 136:16, 136:22 |\n| 104:22, 107:16, | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012022113:56:18 6 of age 66 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\nર્ણ રિ\n\nglass 164:24, 182:21, 58:11, 58:22 185:6, 185:8, 76:6 187:1, 187:2 guarantee 185:14, 185:17, gone 117:6 185:21, 186:1, go 117:3, 186:11 88:18 quess 11:3, 17:5, 51:18, 7:12, quo's qood 54:7, 66:12, 54:13, 58:21, 6:7, 6:8, 157:22 12:19, 22:15, 117:20, 24:18, 30:3, 63:16, 72:4, 117:22, guests 79:8, 79:9, 131:1, 131:21, 81:19, 81:20, 30:18, 31:2, 132:21, 37:7, 31:11, 79:11, 83:16, 146:15, 81:25 84:6, 85:16, 147:2, 153:21, 38:1, 38:14. guo 40:3, 41:5, 85:25, 88:3, 159:6, 166:4, 1:7, 8:3, 12:8, 42:2, 44:25, 88:25, 89:1, 167:19 12:20, 14:19, 90:6, 45:10, 45:23, 89:4, google 22:18, 22:25, 46:9, 48:10, 93:10, 101:24, 136:2 23:7, 24:19, 118:18, 118:21, gossipped 49:15, 50:4, 30:3, 30:19, 67:13, 76:12, 122:20, 123:20, 135:4 31:3, 31:12, 124:20, 127:1, 90:1, 118:5, qotten 37:7, 38:1, 135:22, 121:18, 122:25, 144:11, 38:14, 40:4, 62:14 124:1, 124:22, 145:22, 148:17, government 40:18, 41:5, 185:16, 188:8, 154:8, 154:16, 42:13, 44:12, 12:18, 9:18, 188:15, 160:13, 166:24, 188:13, 44:20, 45:1, 12:25, 44:10, 185:5 188:17, 189:3 185:4, 45:11, 45:23, 44:17, 67:11. goal qust 69:17, 74:5, 46:10, 46:20, 118:19 82:23, 83:4 93:9, 48:11, 49:16, 92:20, god 50:5, 67:13, H 93:16, 94:1, 154:22 70:22, 72:20, 94:13, 110:19, h-a-o-y-u-n goes 133:2, 133:5. 73:4, 74:8, 11:22 74:11, 75:17, 166:23 133:6, 133:9, h-a-y-u-n 75:25, 76:13, going 150:6 11:18 76:23, 80:10, 7:3, 10:13, governors h-o-w-a-n 91:5, 90:2, 10:16, 10:18, 186:16 8:14, 9:22, 25:4, 96:4, 102:9, 22:7, grand 11:16, 11:12, 106:25, 107:19, 26:22, 26:21, 14:1 11:20, 16:4 107:24, 118:5, 28:15, 44:18, great ha 119:9, 119:14, 53:22, 61:8, 87:8, 88:10, 8:4, 14:20 62:4, 68:22, 119:24, 120:9, 131:7, 154:2, hack 120:15, 121:5, 69:19, 74:14, 161:9, 165:19 97:18 74:16, 123:2, 134:5, 75:2, groceries hacked 159:15, 159:21, 79:23, 86:1, 76:8, 76:11 59:21, 59:22, 160:18, 161:21, 86:3, 87:12, grounds 59:23, 59:24, 90:6, 161:24, 162:22, 93:13, 13:10, 13:9, 97:6, 97:22, 163:4, 167:3, 106:5, 106:6, 68:4 98:2, 99:1. 169:16, 171:14, 109:16, 109:17, group 99:6, 99:16, 171:24, 178:11, 134:7, 134:10, 52:13 3:3, 99:17, 100:2, 180:9, 181:11, 134:11, 134:19, grow 100:7, 100:9, 183:12, 184:3, 148:19, 149:6, 42:3 102:11 184:15, 184:16, 149:8, 154:3, gtv hacker 184:24, 185:1, 154:12, 154:14, 21:7, 58:7. 100:10\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZ31KPFileDd3/119/02/113722113:56:167 dPage 67 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n66\n\n| | | | hostetler |\n|-----------------|------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------|\n| haitong | harmony
93:23 | hereunto | |\n| 160:1, 160:25, | hatred | 190:21 | 47:6, 47:25 |\n| 161:19, 162:2 | | higginbotham | hotel |\n| hallowed | 159:4 | 78:4 | 53:9, 81:2, |\n| 157:18 | hbo | highest | 91:21,
93:18, |\n| hamlet | 98:21,
99:23, | 89:19 | 129:23, 130:14 |\n| 91:21 | 100:3 | himself | hour |\n| han | head | 87:10, 93:12, | 170:10 |\n| 91:19 | 182:20 | 101:9, 108:16, | hours |\n| hand | hear | 135:18, 146:19, | 62:12, 154:13 |\n| 59:5, 131:10, | 6:19,
8:9, | 153:18 | howan |\n| 133:9, 190:21 | 8:13,
8:17, | hire | 1:12, 2:8,
6:1, |\n| handed | 112:3, 138:13, | 101:16, 102:3 | 8:7,
9:22, |\n| 140:19, 140:21, | 139:21, 154:11, | hired | 160:2, 187:9, |\n| 177:15, 177:17, | 160:7, 164:24 | 155:20, 156:5, | 190:10 |\n| 178:4 | heard | 156:11 | however |\n| handling | 11:17, 143:1, | hit | 92:18, 100:24, |\n| 96:19, 179:25 | 169:3 | 106:7 | 107:20, 140:1, |\n| hands | held | ho | 173:3, 174:14 |\n| 53:10, 59:14, | 2:8, 89:22, | 151:12, 152:8 | human |\n| 178:21 | 90:10, 90:24 | hold | 93:21 |\n| hang | help | 58:16, 60:13, | hundred |\n| 39:16,
86:5, | 88:15, 93:12, | 86:4, 134:22, | 104:10, 115:5, |\n| 99:13, 154:7 | 167:20 | 155:2 | 158:3, 158:7 |\n| happen | helped | holding | hundreds |\n| 166:12, 166:13 | 105:7 | 59:4, 179:7 | 93:7, 93:16, |\n| happened | helping | holthus | 104:13, 134:3 |\n| 28:2, 59:20, | 78:15 | 101:18 | hurt |\n| 99:4, 179:17, | here | home | 78:16 |\n| 184:9 | 19:6, 21:25, | 60:17,
60:8, | hurting |\n| happening | 22:6,
22:5, | 60:19, 60:21, | 78:6 |\n| 13:11, 61:25, | 28:11, 50:12, | 61:9 | T |\n| 100:10 | 58:19, 77:7, | homeland | id |\n| happy | 79:18,
83:16, | 10:6 | 105:11 |\n| 7:13,
84:9, | 99:12,
99:19, | hong | idea |\n| 85:25 | 107:24, 118:16, | 9:11,
9:13, | 164:25, 165:19, |\n| harassing | 144:7, 147:3, | 96:16, 96:25, | 166:4, 166:18, |\n| 62:9, 83:19, | 148:2, 150:17, | 97:1, 97:15, | 168:15, 169:12 |\n| 84:8, 84:12, | 154:15, 156:23, | 149:14, 159:25, | identification |\n| 126:24, 136:3 | 157:20, 179:23, | 160:19 | 9:17,
9:21, |\n| harassment | 179:24, 184:1, | hooligan | 9:24,
10:5, |\n| 88:19 | 184:4 | 77:19, 78:21, | |\n| harm | hereby | 182:12 | 10:22, 19:3,
22:17, 106:23, |\n| 78:17, 101:11, | 4:3, 4:7, 190:9 | hooper | 121:3, 121:19, |\n| 146:25, 149:5, | herein | 3:19, 18:15, | 123:1, 124:4, |\n| 149:10, 149:13, | 4:5 | 22:8,
42:24 | 124:25 |\n| 151:1, 153:11 | hereinbefore | hope | identify |\n| harming | 190:11 | 114:15 | 39:10, 39:13, |\n| 108 : 7 | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 68 of NOPQRSTUVWXVUYZ[\\V]^\\_`aWbcQdeYfVR\\_ghQiUfjT\\jTR^OkQZ\\almT 92\n\n-\n\n - - - -- -- - - -\n - - - --- - --\n ! - \" - \" # - - - -- --- ---- --- -- -- - - - - -- - -- # # - - - - \\$ -\n- - - - -\n - --\n - - - - - - - - -\n - %&'()\\*&+,-./0.1'(21.3 4.(56\\*-75.(8,&+9:;<=<: >?\n\n## @A8BC%DC@EF GGGHIJJHJ?>?KLLLH@A8BC%DC@EFH4EM\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/2020 11:56:18 08/12/2022113:56:18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021 141:20 118:6, 118:12, 10:10, 35:8, 114:17, 167:15, 119:15, interrogatories 119:10, 50:17, 71:8, 179:10, 179:14 120:10, 124:24, 125:2, 119:25, 136:14, 162:15, judgment 130:9, 167:19 30:13, 170:14, 170:17, 120:16, 30:11, 159:16, 159:22, jeff 171:2, 189:6 30:17, 52:6, 161:22, 162:23, 12:23, 28:11, interrogatory 52:7, 52:10, 163:5, 169:17, 34:10, 176:15, 181:9 42:16, 140:8, 171:4, 171:8 171:15, 171:25, 50:8, 61:17, judgments 181:12, 184:5, 69:25, 86:7, interview 175:22 185:9, 185:18 98:22, 98:23, 118:9, 156:23. juliet involve 156:24, 156:25, 98:24, 100:4, 3:19, 120:23, 32:2 167:17 130:16 100:6, 123:21 involved jeffrey interviewed july 37:1, 3:15 95:2, 98:22 53:22 101:6 involving jersey interviewing jumping 94:24 15:15, 15:18, 2:11, 168:12, 123:21 78:14, 182:9 190:2, 190:9 interviews iun iphone jian 116:12 152:7 introduced 105:9, 105:12 91:19 june jianbin irony 185:25, 186:10 92:8, 99:25, 153:24 151:13 investigation 101:6, 108:14. jinping irrelevant 41:2, 41:14 110:1 27:3, 77:21, 108:3, 182:15 invocation junk 84:14, 87:3, job 79:17, 162:1, 89:3 87:16, 89:2, 1:17, 89:22, 162:3 jury 180:3 89:25, 90:10, invoke 14:1, 121:2, irresponsible 90:24, 115:22, 67:20, 90:11 121:6, 188:12 34:24 115:24, 115:25, invoked justice irresponsibly 117:15, 116:2, 39:21 45:21, 78:4, 27:3 117:17, 117:20, invoking 131:14, 132:25, 150:15, issue 117:22, 134:7, 135:14, 12:9, 12:21, 150:16, 175 : 7 50:12, 50:14, 150:1 24:20, 30:4, jobs 71:1, 81:22 30:20, 31:4, K issued 150:10, 150:21 31:13, 37:8, k-w-o-k joining 9:18, 38:2, 38:15, 10:1, 8:12, 8:14, 79:9 10:5, 52:6, 40:5, 40:19, 9:7, 11:12, joke 41:6, 111:7 41:16, 11:16, 16:4, issues 157:19 42:4, 42:14, 17:13, 18:1 127:4, 187:3 jolley 44:13, 45:2, keep 45:12, 45:24, itself 101:17 88:24, 99:19, 46:11, 164:12, 164:15 jonathan 46:21, 129:20, 130:1, 48:12, 49:17, 151:12, 152:6, J 148:19, 150:5, 50:6, 50:19, 152:8 150:6, 157:22, janover 74:9, 67:14, judge 43:16 169:8 74:23, 75:6, 79:15, 79:19, kept japan 75:18, 76:1, 86:23, 87:19, 108:17, 128:3, 93:20, 149:14 76:14, 76:24, 88:14, 88:16, 135:2 jay 90:3, 91:6, 88:22, 88:25, 3:7, 6:9,\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/22/2113:56:16 0 dPage 70 of 92\n\nkidnap 12:12, 13:8, 9:1, 15:24, 158:22, 159:1, 78:6 13:19, 16:6, 16:2, 27:13, 159:7, 159:9, killer 18:9, 18:13, 28:14, 29:10, 159:13, 163:22, 19:5, 47:9, 47:12, 167:5, 176:17, 132:19 19:11, 43:8, 50:21, 48:9, 49:11, 177:12, 177:16, killers 66:10, 75:11, 113:6, 113:9, 177:17, 177:24, 108:2 89:10, 127:23, 131:1, 169:19, 178:1 kind 130:7, 160:2, 170:14, 175:9, learn 21:15, 34:23, 180:10, 187:9, 175:13, 175:16, 167:17 53:24, 54:14, 188:3, 190:10 178:9, 183:10 least 55:7, 59:7, lawsuits L 14:11, 35:21, 64:10, 86:25, 28:22, 53:21, 78:19, 130:22, 87:1, 88:11, lake 82:18, 174:13 150:14, 166:6, 93:21, 94:2, 3:5 lawyer 170:10 96:1, 97:8, language 6:24, 16:18, left 108:23, 128:18, 6:21, 17:15. 131:15, 131:20, 23:20, 23:22, 59:16, 61:2, 54:20 17:22, 25:10, 25:11, 94:5 133:13, 134:16, large 26:11, 28:11, legal 134:18, 136:3, 96:21 34:21, 36:4, 144:16, 146:4, 3:3, 52:13, las 146:24, 36:9, 36:13, 54:11, 55:10, 149:12, 3:6, 93:18, 51:15, 53:15, 150:2, 150:11, 117:10, 117:14, 130:14 55:25, 56:17, 167:9, 173:11 150:13 last 59:21, 64:18, let's kindness 8:9, 8:13, 65:4, 65:6, 134:14 18:22, 62:10, 8:17, 14:5, 78:21, 96:19. 71:20, knowingly 89:4, 15:14, 15:17, 97:11, 97:13, 102:2, 120:23, 67:9, 46:16, 18:12, 29:1, 110:2, 113:23, 70:22. 73:16 121:13, 122:20, 29:5, 29:9, 116:9, 117:15, knowledge 123:20, 124:20, 40:23, 41:25, 117:16, 117:20, 127:1, 155:3 19:6, 41:3, 89:7, 89:22, 117:21, 140:19, 57:19, lethal 71:2, 89:24, 90:10, 140:22, 140:25, 146:13 113:8 125:22, 126:5, 141:6, 141:8, letter known 126:15, 127:8, 141:11, 142:13, 44:16, 56:5, 135:13, 88:14, 127:22, 152:21, 142:16, 155:7, 152:7, 138:15 169:10, 155:6, 163:9 155:17, 156:12, 170:21, 170:22, letters later 157:21, 156:14, 175:20 17:12, 53:18. 94:19, 99:15, 165:20, 165:21, 54:2, knows 53:19, 145:9, 145:12 166:24, 166:25, 71: 6 54:3, 54:9, law 167:2, 174:1, 61:2, 61:3 kong 33:18, 47:5, 178:2 level 9:11, 9:13, 47:15, 47:25, lawyers 96:16, 96:25, 89:19 49:5, 49:8, 33:23, 34:2, li 97:1, 97:15, 49:10, 56:2, 51:9, 64:24, 149:14, 91:19 159:25, 71:9, 66:22, 117:22, 127:25, 160:19 lian 71:12, 71:15, 128:4, 153:14, kwok 91:19 101:17, 102:3, 155:20, 156:13, 1:12, 2:8, 6:1, liang 120:19 107:11, 156:15, 156:21, 6:7, 8:7, 8:18, 151:14, 152:16 lawsuit 157:1, 158:3, 8:19, 11:7, liar 8:20, 8:24, 108:19, 109:5,\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n### Case 22:5001:20 - DoO5I6231KPFileDd3/19/2254 Enteried:03/12822113:56:16 1 dPage 71 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 110:8, 144:20 | 88:23,
89:4, | lose | 112:6 |\n|------------------|------------------|--------------------|--------------------|\n| license | 103:9,
118:1, | 115:24 | madam |\n| 10:1 | 118:24, 120:13, | losing | 141:17 |\n| lieu | 120:20 | 115:22 | made |\n| 5:2 | little | lost | 39:7, 40:13, |\n| life | 99:22, 168:11 | 113:9, 113:21, | 51:6,
57:9, |\n| 77:22, 87:14, | live | 113:23, 153:25 | 64:21,
58:4, |\n| 87:24,
88:1, | 22:5,
22:6, | lot | 85:14,
92:8, |\n| 88:2, 101:12, | 77:6, 77:10, | 12:2, 54:19, | 95:24,
97:20, |\n| 116:3, 134:11, | 80:5,
80:12, | 57:18,
87:6, | 98:21,
101:7, |\n| 142:8 | 81:15,
82:3, | 92:1,
87:10, | 111:4,
113:8, |\n| light | 129:11, 129:13 | 92:15,
94:23, | 113:12, 113:17, |\n| 157:19 | lived | 100:25,
113:3, | 114:13, 127:25, |\n| limited | 81:12,
81:18 | 113:19,
130:16, | 132:17, 135:1, |\n| 31:10, 38:9, | lives | 130:18, 146:22, | 135:5, 145:16, |\n| 38:12,
39:1, | 77:11 | 149:4,
149:16, | 146:23, 149:23, |\n| 39:7,
39:4, | living | 150:7, 150:8, | 150:2,
161:8, |\n| 39:11,
39:14, | 18:11,
88:20, | 150:11 | 163:18,
164:19, |\n| 39:18, 39:24, | 108:22 | lots | 171:21,
178:17, |\n| 40:2, 40:14, | llc | 57:16,
58:1, | 178:25,
179:23, |\n| 49:22, 49:25, | 3:11 | 66:1 | 181:3 |\n| 50:3, 50:23, | lobby | loud | magic |\n| 169:14, 176:2, | 54:23 | 154:10 | 143:23 |\n| 176:9 | local | low | mail |\n| line | 22:16, 22:19, | 114:2, 114:4, | 52:13,
52:16, |\n| 10:14, 79:10, | 188:10 | 182:13 | 52:18,
52:19, |\n| 84:9, 86:17, | logan | lude | 53:8, 53:13, |\n| 88:5,
88:8, | 1:4, 6:10, | 91:17, 93:11, | 55:15,
55:19, |\n| 88:12,
88:18, | 15:22, 124:2, | 94:3, 94:6, | 180:9, 180:13, |\n| 88:24,
95:9, | 124:23, 188:19, | 94:16, 94:18, | 180:16 |\n| 96:1 | 189:5 | 94:20, 95:10, | mailed |\n| lines | long | 96:3, 96:11, | 179:13 |\n| 165:23 | 107:25, 138:7, | 110:6, 113:10, | mails |\n| link | 149:7, 149:8 | 114:11, 115:9, | 52:24, 53:3 |\n| 43:2, 64:17, | longest | 115:22, 115:24, | mainland |\n| 65:13, 65:15, | 90:25 | 115:25, 116:7, | 9:10, 96:20, |\n| 65:17 | look | 116:16, 116:17, | 96:24, 97:10, |\n| list | 55:14, 111:19, | 130:14, 145:2, | 111:12, 115:2, |\n| 57 : 8 | 143:11, 143:14, | 177:1, 177:6, | 134:1, 145:1, |\n| listed | 143:16, 143:22, | 177:8 | 150:2
150:1, |\n| 57:14 | 144:8, 144:11, | ludicrous | make |\n| listening | 156:24, 168:7 | 157:24 | 6:19,
6:24, |\n| 138:7 | looked | M | 8:10, 21:22, |\n| literally | 168:6 | ma | 35:16,
34:22, |\n| 65:7, 65:13 | looking | 110:25, 111:2, | 36:25,
54:8, |\n| litigation | 60:23, 61:20, | 111:10, 111:12, | 70:25,
86:5, |\n| 28:5, 49:6, | 111:24, 111:25, | 111:18, 111:24, | 88:14,
92:10, |\n| 80:17, 82:14, | 160:14 | | 93:10,
93:20, |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 72 of LMNOPQRSTUVTSWXYZT[\\]^\\_U`aObcWdTP]efOgSdhRZhRP\\MiOYR\\_jkR 92\n\n-- -- -- - - --\n - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - -- - - - - ---- -\n- --- - - -- - ---- -\n- -- -- - - - - -- -\n -\n\n -- - -- - - - ---\n ! - - - - - - -- - - - - \" - - - - #\\$%&'(\\$)\\*+,-.,/%&0/,1\n\n# 2,&34(+53,&6\\*\\$)789:;:8 <8\n\n=>6?@#A@=BC DDDEFGGEG6?@#A@=BCE2BK\n\n#### Case 22:5007:20 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/09/22/2113:56:16 3 dPage 73 of 92\n\nmiles mitchell motivation name 118:11 6:9, 13:8, 18:9, 35:6, 36:2, 8:7, 8:10, 79:8, 180:10 36:7, 36:11, moutai 8:13, 8:15, million 155:16, 155:21 8:17, 8:21, 9:4. 92:22, 115:4 96:17, mo 9:6, 9:12, 9:14, 115:5, move 132:13, 151:13, 187:13 9:15, 11:10, 62:10, 79:24, 151:14, 11:15, 11:22, 151:15, moment 79:25, 88:23, 151:16, 151:17, 16:3, 16:17, 18:24, 22:9, 108:24, 138:2, 18:5, 43:2, 18:1, 152:6, 152:13, 35:21, 138:17, 147:21, 152:15, 152:16, 59:5, 106:19, 184:22 18:9, 18:12. 167:22, 22:25, 23:17, 152:17, 152:21, 118:19, 149:11, moved 29:13, 34:9, 152:22, 157:12, 149:17, 152:24 127:3 34:20, 34:24, 157:15, 160:1, momentarily moving 35:22, 36:21, 160:25, 173:17 79:10 106:12, 125:4, millions 47:7, 48:20, money 183:10 49:7, 93:1, 93:7, 49:3, 115:18, 179:8, msn 93:17, 57:21, 58:11, 108:2, 98:20, 104:6, 184:2, 185:4, 115:6, 58:17, 58:22, 134:2, 185:14 104:18, 104:25, 60:5, 61:21, 134:3, 146:18, mongolia 105:1 91:18, 97:13, 146:25, 150:14, 130:19 much 93:5, 97:15, 138:14, 150:22, 182:5 mongolian 12:6, 42:9, 152:6, 152:21, mind 93:9, 95:5, 101:11, 104:16, 156:19, 170:20, 73:14, 100:20, 115:2, 116:10, 116:4, 119:12, 170:24, 172:7, 101:24, 128:14, 128:16, 116:11, 130:15 119:22, 131:8, 139:20 176:8 monies 132:12, 132:15, named mine 132:3 132:16, 137:21, 23:8, 35:6, 22:5 month 149:19, 151:1, 36:6, 36:9, minister 153:21, 154:4, 29:2, 29:4 36:13, 36:16, 182:20 185:14, 187:5 months 43:16, 47:5, ministry must 99:24, 107:21, 48:17, 115:22, 182:20 111:25 101:19, 109:24, 178:11 minor 116:6, 122:10, more names 131:2 125:7, 138:11, 7:21, 20:12, 34:4, 34:15, minutes 71:20, 172:6 72:9, 47:8, 58:1, mute 21:13, 21:14, 102:17, 104:16, 80:9, 101:20, 79:9 62:13, 72:13, 114:16, 153:18, 101:21, 101:22, 170:11 myself 157:4, 157:6, 116:18, 116:20, mischaracterizes 17:6, 20:13, 157:8, 157:10, 116:21, 134:18, 85:17 158:2 25:17, 53:4. 151:19 57:14, miss 53:5, morning narcotics 106:9 101:7, 103:3, 6:7, 6:8, 21:8, 15:10 mistake 129:12, 131:5, 58:5, 65:7, narrow 144:6, 144:8, 34:23, 100:1 66:6, 160:17. 157:15 156:10, 163:18, mistaken 161:14 nation 33:1, 34:19 most 173:24 55:12 N mistaking 6:21, 84:15, national 34:24 109:20, 184:20 n-u-o 57:15 mostly misunderstood 170:21 140:14 107:23\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n72\n\n#### Case 22:5001:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012022113:56:16 4 dPage 74 of 92\n\nnative 17:1, 17:2, 55:25, 56:2, notice 6:20 17:16, 17:23, 56:22, 56:25, 17:25, 19:2, natural 18:6, 30:11, 59:25, 63:19, 19:7, 111:6, 48:22, 31:20, 67:11, 72:1, 34:11 188:7 49:5, 49:11, 74:6, 113:23, naturally november 52:7, 52:10, 120:2, 120:5, 99:23, 171:21 110:11 80:18, 80:22, 120:13, 155:24, nearly nowadays 88:23, 89:4, 162:5, 168:12, 55:4 59:22, 98:4 102:4, 102:20, 169:25, 172:21, necessarily number 103:20, 106:2, 174:17, 174:21, 57:15, 10:16, 55:17 6:16, 107:2, 107:10, 175:1, 176:2, need 62:1, 62:7, 114:13, 118:1, 180:10, 180:11, 62:25, 78:2, 7:3, 7:6, 118:24, 120:5, 190:2, 190:8, 91:16, 104:24, 13:14, 19:12, 120:19, 131:1, 190:9 120:24, 124:20, 19:23, 25:7, 145:13, 146:15, newspapers 160:10, 171:8, 53:17, 55:19, 176:15 92:1 188:6, 189:2 58:20, 58:21, nevada ' s next numbered 59:25, 61:13, 113:6 135:10 74:1, 90:13, 124:11 never nice 98:4, 109:14, numerics 33:2, 51:12, 134:16 22:25 112:11, 112:22, 65:24, 66:3, nine 112:23, 113:3, nv 73:25, 74:12, 21:13, 21:14, 113:15, 118:17, 3:6 102:12, 111:12, 81:17 118:20, 135:22, O 136:25, 137:2, 111:13, 111:18, nods o-k 111:21, 133:3, 137:16, 7 : 4 144:23, 8:14 134:19, 134:11, none 146:9, 146:12, oath 142:9, 157:21, 149:7, 151:19, 112:19 4 : 16 175:23 154:8, 159:7, nonetheless object new 167:17, 173:25, 7:2 5:8, 26:21, 1:2, 2:11, 174:1 nonlawyers 60:18, 62:4, 6:12, 10:2, needed 56:18 90:13, 160:11, 23:24, 24:14, 54:12, 110:13, nonresponsive 175:25 25:10, 25:24, 110:18 137:8, 138:3, objected 30:14, 30:16, needs 180:7, 184:22 127:2 31:1, 31:10, 50:20, 51:6, normal objection 32:8, 32:12, 143:5 20:10 8:23, 10:10, 33:20, 38:9, negotiate notarize 10:25, 14:13, 38:12, 38:22, 180:22 33:17 18:2, 18:7, 39:4, 39:1, net notarized 23:12, 23:23, 39:11, 39:7, 163:2 178:6 24:8, 25:12, 39:14, 39:18, netherland notary 25:16, 27:8, 39:24, 40:1, 22:2 33:20, 2:10, 27:14, 27:20, 40:14, 40:25, network 190:7 29:14, 29:6, 43:20, 44:9, 101 : 1 note 32:22, 33:25, 45:8, 46:8, neurologist 58:20, 123:2 34:3, 34:17, 46:17, 49:22, 126:19 noted 35:16, 41:8, 49:24, 50:3, nevada 179:12, 187:6 43:13, 44:5, 50:23, 51:1. 15:25, 16:25, nothing 58:20, 103:17\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012 12:56:18 6 5 of 92\n\n45:15, 46:2, october 39:16, 42:23, 134:14, 143:5, 48:23, 49:1, 91:12 43:1, 43:2, 143:6, 144:23, 56:9, 56:12, office 59:11, 61:21, 146:16, 147:3, 56:20, 66:2, 78:2, 150:4, 151:4, 57:24, 32:11, 32:14, 69:6, 70:17, 82:6, 90:8, 172:14 32:16, 59:15, 71:1, 72:17, 90:9, 96:25, open 59:17 73:7, 73:19, 100:20, 102:16, 98:11, officer 113:24, 80:6, 92:4, 4:15, 105:4, 106:18, 118:19, 146:12, 31:9, 103:10, 104:9, 113:10, 122:15, 149:23, 154:8 39:13, 39:23. 104:21, 107:15, 128:11, 131:22, 176:12 opened 115:23, 112:21, 141:6, 142:5, 110:22 officers 144:24, 119:19, 129:18, 146:6, openly 39:19 138:1, 139:5, 152:9, 152:24, 110:12, offices 110:20, 139:15, 139:18, 153:15, 154:16, 32:17 135:18, 136:2, 140:18, 142:17, 156:20, 161:8, 144:22, 145:20 offshore 143:18, 144:13, 168:12, 168:13, operating 160:3, 160:4, 145:24, 168:14, 168:22, 147:7, 18:11 161:1, 161:2 147:13, 150:24, 168:25, 169:7, opportunity oh 154:19, 155:8, 172:14, 174:12, 114:16 165:19 156:7, 156:18, 175:2, 184:18 opposed ok one-minute 158:15, 160:12, 33:19 9:2, 10:23, 161:4, 162:6, 21:13, 21:15 18:25, 19:22, order 172:23, 173:21, one-year-old 6:21, 19:24, 35:13, 7:4, 173:22, 180:19, 34:13 127:3, 159:25, 42:24, 43:1, 180:20, 183:18, ones 161:1, 161:6, 58:24, 61:1, 186:5 140:13, 180:16 180:7 81:11, 81:24, objections ongoing 84:11, 86:8, ordered 4:9, 6:25, 111:22, 174:6 179:11 96:9, 97:13, 124:1, 85:23, online original 100:12, 102:6, 124:22, 170:13, 57:18, 58:2, 105:20, 106:9, 107:1 188:18, 189:4 78:11, 87:7, 114:25, 115:24, other obligation 87:12, 88:3, 122:21, 123:20, 6:17, 14:23, 69:4, 71:11, 114:8, 116:22, 124:20, 127:9, 15:1, 20:17, 103:8 135:19, 136:2, 132:2, 144:14, 20:20, 28:14, obligations 144:19, 144:23, 183:3 28:22, 29:9, 170:8 145:11, 145:12, old 32:17, 33:20, observe 145:18, 145:19, 3:13, 54:25 33:23, 34:2, 18:4 181:23 omitted 35:9, 61:21, obstruction only 124:12 79:25, 80:22, 167:16 22:24, 34:11, once 83:18, 91:18, obstructive 58:10, 69:7, 15:23, 98:3, 108:5. 17:5, 70:9 70:17, 71:2, 45:22, 46:1, 108:8, 112:5, 93:19, obtain 81:18, 116:17, 116:18, 99:16, 91:10, 65:2 104:23, 114:1, 120:13, 128:5, 148:15 114:4, obviously 114:3, one 130:15, 155:6, 115:10, 115:13, 183:23 28:6, 155:15, 155:16, 8:6, 9:9, 9:10, 117:17, 131:2, occurred 155:18, 155:20, 18:24, 22:9, 131:24, 132:1, 163:14 157:1, 158:7, 28:2, 28:6,\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n74\n\n#### Case 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:16 dPage 76 of 92\n\n| 168:5, 170:8, | P | party | 178:17, 178:24, |\n|-------------------|--------------------|------------------|--------------------|\n| 172:15, 172:25, | | 12:4, 50:10, | 181:9, 183:24 |\n| 174:13, 175:2, | pacific | 53:23, 56:23, | payments |\n| 176:11, 179:25, | 8:3, 14:20, | 57:4, 57:9, | 36:25, 39:7, |\n| 181:2 | 47:11, 48:8 | 57:15, 65:25, | 40:13, 51:4, |\n| others | page | 83:5,
82:24, | 185:21, 185:24 |\n| 82:8, 82:9, | 107:18, 124:6, | 92:17,
91:22, | pays |\n| 82:12 | 125:4, 188:2, | 111:16, 115:12, | 29:22, 76:18 |\n| otherwise | 188:6, 189:2 | 116:5, 131:11, | peak |\n| 97:6, 175:22 | pages | 131:12, 161:15, | 100:9 |\n| out | 54:17, 142:4, | 178:18 | |\n| | 142:12 | party's | peasant |\n| 15:1, 33:10, | paid | | 108:19, 134:8, |\n| 33:13, 56:8, | 12:6, 30:14, | 86:16 | 182:13, 182:14 |\n| 58:17,
62:20, | 37:1,
44:15, | password | penalties |\n| 66:14, 78:7, | 47:20, 47:22, | 43:5 | 5:7 |\n| 78:12, 78:16, | 49:10,
60:1, | past | penalty |\n| 85:7,
99:5, | 76:6,
89:24, | 16:19,
46:6, | 125:13 |\n| 99:8,
99:9, | 118:1, 133:12, | 46:15,
78:1, | pending |\n| 108:14, 117:17, | 133:13, 175:22, | 82:4, 132:10, | 7:8, 133:20, |\n| 120:24, 127:7, | 184:14, 184:23, | 132:11, 142:18, | 135:10, 137:6, |\n| 145:20, 179:2, | 184:24 | 150:9, 177:14 | 154:20, 187:3 |\n| 179:20, 181:23, | paper | pathway | people |\n| 183:25 | 58:20 | 10:19 | 6:16, 20:20, |\n| out-of-your-juri- | paragraph | paused | 54:11,
54:8, |\n| sdiction | 107:18, 183:11 | 79:7 | 54:25, 56:15, |\n| 72:4 | part | pausing | 78:12, 81:3, |\n| outcome | 28:7, 31:19, | 78:23 | 91:16, 91:18, |\n| 190:18 | 54:17,
80 : 3 , | pay | 94:23,
93:20, |\n| outside | 147:11, 153:22, | 29:20, 29:24, | 95:3,
95:1, |\n| 32:8, 72:10, | 163:25, 174:6 | 30:16, 36:20, | 106:9, 108:4, |\n| 144:3 | particular | 37:4, 37:18, | 115:13, 115:14, |\n| over | 8:1, 13:11, | 44:9,
40:2, | 115:19, 116:12, |\n| 6:16, 80:15, | 69:3, 117:21 | 48:7,
49:14, | 116:15, 130:17, |\n| 94:25, 104:10, | particularly | 76:10,
51:2, | 145:1, 146:5, |\n| 124:10, 124:14, | 10:14 | 76:20, 118:14, | 146:22,
149:14, |\n| 135:19, 180:23, | | 118:23, 119:7, | 149:16, 150:8, |\n| 186:3 | parties | 159:13, 176:14, | 153:19, 155:18 |\n| overbroad | 4:5, 6:2, 55:1, | 185:14 | people's |\n| 79:20 | 190:16 | payable | 57:1 |\n| oversee | partner | 180:25, 181:3 | percent |\n| 93:23 | 93:6,
96:24, | paying | 161:13, 180:1 |\n| own | 97:2,
97:16, | 37:21, 37:23, | perhaps |\n| 30:25, 58:16, | 115:20, 184:17 | 47:23, 51:22, | 43:17, 43:22, |\n| 75:22, 86:20, | partners | 62:21, 132:22, | 54:20, 101:14, |\n| 161:17, 161:18 | 83:1,
83:2, | 159:18 | |\n| owner | 83:3, 149:15 | payment | 123:17, 131:24, |\n| | partnership | 36:25, 51:6, | 134:3, 157:23, |\n| 81:20, 82:1 | 85:11 | 173:5, 173:9, | 159:4, 161:12, |\n| owning | | | 170:19, 172:24, |\n| 160:24 | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n#### Case 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/129122113:56:16 7 dPage 77 of 92\n\n| 177:9 | phone | piece | podhaskie |\n|--------------------|-------------------------|------------------|--------------------|\n| period | 59:6,
59:7, | 55:15, 55:19, | 23:9, 23:14, |\n| 82:5, 90:25, | 59:21,
59:22, | 99:23, 115:10, | 23:18, 23:19, |\n| 101:6, 104:15, | 59:24, 59:25, | 130:6 | 23:22, 25:2, |\n| 138:15 | 60:1, 60:20, | piecemeal | 25:9, 25:15, |\n| perjury | 61:15, 62:1, | 74:18 | 25:22, 26:3, |\n| 5:7, 125:13 | 62:2,
62:7, | place | 26:5, 26:20, |\n| permitted | 62:18, 62:22, | 77:11,
97:18, | 27:6,
27:12, |\n| 79:21 | 62:25,
63:1, | 148:7,
130:1, | 27:16, 29:12, |\n| persecution | 63:3,
63:5, | 157:18 | 29:18, 29:20, |\n| 129:22 | 63:11,
63:7, | placed | 29:22, 29:25, |\n| person | 64:12, 65:20, | 98:24 | 32:7, 33:4, |\n| 18:10, 54:5, | 84:3,
84:21, | plaintiff | 33:10, 33:16, |\n| 59:16, 64:6, | 84:24, 84:25, | 1:5, 3:4, 6:10, | 33:19, 33:24, |\n| 82:6, 88:10, | 85:7,
85:13, | 15:21, 124:2, | 51:19 |\n| 93:4,
93:24, | 85:16, 87:18, | 124:23, 171:10, | podhaskie's |\n| 111:7, 115:5, | 89:16,
97:5, | 188:19, 189:5 | 32:14 |\n| 115:6, 115:10, | 97:7, 97:22, | plan | point |\n| 115:12, 115:22, | 98:2,
98:4, | 60:3, 60:6 | 57:25,
85:8, |\n| 133:4, 146:3, | 98:7,
98:8, | platform | 94:3, 100:14, |\n| 152:10, 170:18, | 98:9,
98:15, | 92:24,
94:20, | 100:17, 150:19, |\n| 176:18, 176:19, | 98:16, 98:18, | 101:1,
97:21, | 187 : 3 |\n| 182:23 | 98:25, 99:1, | 108:18, 182:11 | police |\n| personal | 99:6, 99:18, | playing | 54:10,
93:9, |\n| 24:19, 30:3, | 100:2, 100:3, | 128:17 | 95:5,
111:11, |\n| 36:24,
42:2, | 100:8, 100:13, | pleading | 111:16,
115:3, |\n| 60:21,
60:19, | 104:11, 104:14, | 117:14 | 116:10,
116:11, |\n| 62:7,
61:14, | 104:16, 104:24, | pleadings | 116:15 |\n| 62:18,
62:21, | 105:3, 105:7, | 117:10 | policeman |\n| 91:17,
96:13, | 113:20, 128:9, | please | 130:16 |\n| 97:20,
97:25, | 128:10, 144:25, | 5:2, 6:19, 7:7, | political |\n| 108:13, 108:17, | 145:2 | 7:12, 18:19, | 11:9 |\n| 109:7, 110:16, | phones | 18:24, 19:15, | portable |\n| 113:12, 114:9, | 99:9, 99:11,
99:16, | 19:20, 22:9, | 129:13 |\n| 131:12, 132:24, | 99:19,
100:6, 100:7, | 22:12, 22:23, | portion |\n| 135:2, 135:17, | 102:10, 102:17, | 28:19, 35:2, | 120:6, 153:5, |\n| 144:17, 145:15, | 102:25, 103:2, | 35:10, 57:21, | 165:2, 166:5, |\n| 146:8, 149:21, | 103:5, 128:5 | 60:15, 62:16, | 167:10 |\n| 149:24, 153:3, | photo | 69:23, 78:22, | posed |\n| 153:17 | 129:2 | 78:23, 79:1, | 112:9, 112:10 |\n| personally | physician | 89:5,
90:20, | posing |\n| 25:23, 53:4, | 126:21, 127:19 | 96:4, 103:14, | 86:12, 86:20, |\n| 53:5, 107:19, | pick | 106:19, 131:22, | 87:8 |\n| 107:24, 107:25, | 141:6, 142:2, | 133:17, 141:18, | position |\n| 110:7
personnel | 142:5 | 144:1, 148:23, | 94:19 |\n| | pick-up | 152:24, 167:22 | possession |\n| 182:3 | 128:24 | plural | 177:5 |\n| persons
184:19 | | 159:10 | possible |\n| | | | 7:22, 13:4, |\n| | | | |\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n76\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - Dood30231K PFiled 03/11/02/2022113:56:16 8 dPage 78 of 92\n\n> Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n53:21, 60:16, 62:8, 91:16 72:17, 79:18, 141:11, 153:14, 83:11, 85:20, presenting 90:12, 90:20, 190:6 86:22, 104:18 55:3 153:1, 162:17, profit 166:7, 166:24, possibly presently 130:15, 169:14 167:17, 83:17, 84:7, 41:2 187:4 program 12:16, privileged 154:21 preserve 21:7, 94:24, 13:8, post 162:7, 95:23, 96:1 103:8 123:18, 160:17, 163:16, 163:20, programs president 166:14, 161:14 166:20, 94:9 34:20, 175:8, posted 166:23, 167:24 175:20 progress 87:7, probably 55:6, pressed 106:11 123:10 33:1, 34:12, 87:12, promise 65:13, 65:15, 37:1, 54:2, potential 65:18 117:7 100:12, 130:18, 45:9, 45:21 pretending pronounce 151:19 potentially 54:25 8:9, 8:11, problem 158:7 173:4, 174:14 pretty 123:22, 126:22, 54:23, 137:21 power pronunciation 148:25 79:3 prevailing 9:8, 9:9, 9:10, practice proceed 172:7 178:18 8:5, 25:7, 72:4 proof prevent 84:11 prc 126:9 146:16 proceeded 149:15 previous properly 8:6 preceded 8:10, 8:11 16:18, 16:24, proceeding 49:5 136:24, 137:12, properties 5:9, 7:5, 72:6, prejudice 137:17 129:24, 130:18 72:22 172:18, 173:6, previously proposition proceedings 173:9, 174:7 7:17, 47:12, 7:1 7:23 premises 57:5, 58:4, propounded proceeds 149:12 66:10, 122:11, 142:22 159:19 preparation 153:19 proprietary produce principle 20:10, 64:6, 94:21 142:24, 144:24, 149:8 169:21 prosecuted 178:13 prepare print 13:21 12:16, produced 19:12, 20:6, 33:10, 33:13 prosecuting 135:15, 136:22, 20:15, 43:20, prior 12:25 139:8, 140:6, 63:25 48:21, 63:13, prosecution 147:17, 147:24, prepared 85:1, 67:8, 12:24 154:23, 159:24, 122:1 44:22 44:2, 120:19, protect 160:10, 160:16, preparer prison 78:19 176:25 174:18, 44:23 130:23, 131:11 protection production preparing privately 29:2, 39:21, 124:3, 124:8, 64:3, 149:12 110:7, 110:8, 67:24, 159:16 139:3, 140:7, 110:20 prescription 110:11, protections 140:10, 142:22, 15:10 privilege 28:12, 28:23, 143:23, 177:12, presence 7:10, 27:17, 74:20, 74:23 188:21 27:24, 32:3, 19:6, 25:2 protective professional 41:9, 41:12, present 127:3 2:9, 102:17, 45:14, 46:3, 3:18, 6:23, protocols 54:14\n\n#### Case 22:5007:20 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012022113:56:18 9 dPage 79 of 92\n\nproven pursuing 159:8 52:20, 55:11, 95:9, 134:20 races 57:19, 58:20, 96:3, 114:14, 114:10 159:2 60:18, 86:14, put 87:25, 87:15, provide racism 53:1, 94:19. 88:20, 88:21, 44:19, 44:23, 123:15, 159:5 131:10, 68:17, 97:23, 99:20, 70:16, 131:11, 151:23, randazza 101:5, 101:13, 164:14, 70:19, 70:23, 164:11, 3:3, 3:8, 71:4, 73:17, 168:9, 168:15, 52:13, 104:11, 123:11, 72:2 123:16, 123:13, 183:23 rapist 114:16, 116:25, 126:6, 127:10, 128:4, 135:22, 108:1, Q 108:11, 127:12, 128:21, 139:1, 140:9, 108:18, 109:1, questioning 129:10, 129:25, 148:17 110:5, 110:8, 10:15, 88:25 132:21, 136:5, provided 110:13, 110:12, questions 143:20, 153:8, 42:16, 43:9, 110:18, 132:19, 6:14, 7:2, 154:22, 157:18, 46:7, 46:16, 134:5, 144:20, 15:6, 59:2. 157:24, 158:23, 46:25, 69:1, 151:5, 182:12 62:11, 62:14, 160:15, 161:15, 69:4, 69:16, rate 68:3, 68:7, 168:5, 169:2, 97:11, 125:11, 119:22 68:15, 68:13, 169:12, 177:10 139:24, 140:11, rather 68:18, 72:9, realtime 140:15, 143:21, 7:3, 16:3, 72:12, 77:20, 2:10, 190:7 170:12 147:6, 34:23, 34:25, 78:9, 79:21, reask public 54:14 80:1, 83:16, 33:20, 143:17 2:11, rd 83:18, 86:11, reason 82:25, 183:25, 3:13 86:14, 86:17, 11:1, 24:2, 184:1, 190:7 reach 87:23, 88:4, 60:20, 62:6, pull 172:4 88:19, 88:8, 62:9, 62:10, 121:13, 167:5 read 90:7, 118:14, 83:17, 103:17, punitive 17:6, 17:7, 126:9, 136:21, 106:12, 114:3, 132:8, 132:21, 17:20, 52:21, 143:17, 147:20, 147:14, 159:7, 133:14 52:22, 52:25, 148:2, 171:6, 168:5, 174:24, purchase 53:2, 53:4. 186:25 178:13 93:18 61:1, 89:6, quiang receive purchased 89:8, 106:2, 80:10 47:17, 51:12, 59:10, 59:12 107:4, 113:1, quick 52:8, 52:7, purported 123:16, 141:23, 59:1 52:12, 52:16, 146:4, 146:3, 141:25, 161:6, quiet 52:18, 53:5, 177:1 161:8 71:24 180:12 purpose reading quite received 26:8, 83:19, 34:12, 55:15 29:16, 100:21, 45:7, 45:18, 83:20, 131:3, ready 101:5, 113:19, 52:20, 52:24, 133:8, 156:16 65:11 143:19, 155:19, 53:4, 53:16, purposes really 168:20, 186:7, 54:6, 178:23 26:5, 26:13, 10:13, 21:12. 186:12 receivinq 26:19 27:1, 27:2, quote 53:14 pursuant 34:18, 34:22, 171:9, 171:10 recess 19:7, 22:15, 36:10, 36:18, R 66:9, 79:13. 22:19, 188:9 37:3, 37:16, race 102:8, 155:5 pursue 37:17, 37:21, 158:19, 159:4, 134:19\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n78\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOHDZ31KPFiledQS/110/02/254EnteFieebO3/113:56:180 dPage 80 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Canducted on Anril 1, 2021\n\n79\n\n| Conducted on April 1, 2021
17 | | | | | |\n|----------------------------------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------------------|--|--|\n| recognize | 38:5, 38:19, | 83:12, 85:21 | rephrase | | |\n| 22:24, 156:22, | 40:7,
40:21, | relevant | 7:13, 70:21 | | |\n| 158:5 | 41:21, 42:6, | 10:11, 62:11, | replace | | |\n| recollection | 42:21, 44:20, | 83:15,
62:14, | 93:13, 94:6, | | |\n| 103:1 | 45:4, 45:16, | 84:8,
83:22, | 94:20 | | |\n| recommendation | 46:4, 46:13, | 85:15,
84:11, | report | | |\n| 16:8, 16:10, | 46:23, 48:15, | 86:12,
88:20, | 40:13, 42:9, | | |\n| 86:6 | 49:19, 50:21, | 88:21,
127:11 | 161:8, 161:13 | | |\n| recommended | 67:17, 69:13, | relied | reported | | |\n| 16:18, 168:8 | 75:11, 75:20, | 117:22, 183:13 | 1:15, 54:10, | | |\n| record | 76:3, 76:16, | remarks | 130:21, 146:1 | | |\n| 42:19, 79:12, | 91:8,
77:1, | 113:17 | reporter | | |\n| 84:7,
85:25, | 127:13, 161:24, | remember | 2:10, 5:1, 5:4, | | |\n| 86:2,
86:3, | 162:18, 162:25, | 18:3, 23:6, | 5:13,
58:8, | | |\n| 89:8,
91:9, | 163:7, 170:2, | 23:13, 32:23, | 58:12, 58:25, | | |\n| 130:1, 141:25, | 171:17, 172:2, | 34:5, 35:23, | 80:11, 81:22, | | |\n| 184:1, 190:13 | 181:14, 184:7, | 82:6,
82:7, | 89:6, 141:17, | | |\n| recorded | 185:11 | 101:20, 123:17, | 141:21, 184:22, | | |\n| 115:8 | regarding | 126:4, 126:25, | 190:6, 190:7 | | |\n| recording | 45:8,
7:9, | 127:11, 144:9, | represent | | |\n| 21:20, 21:22 | 45:21, 79:17, | 147:23, 150:20, | 6:9, 26:6, | | |\n| records | 79:21, 100:13, | 150:21, 153:8, | 26:20, 27:7, | | |\n| 97:10, 127:1, | 175:16, 187:3 | 154:5, 154:17, | 27:12, 27:16, | | |\n| 129:17, 129:20, | regards | 154:21, 158:8, | 27:22, 106:25, | | |\n| 185:20, 185:23, | 130:6 | 169:6, 171:7, | 121:5, 121:20, | | |\n| 185:24 | registered | 183:5 | 155:11, 155:17, | | |\n| recover | 2:9, 180:9, | remembering | 155:21, 156:17, | | |\n| 102:10, 102:14 | 180:13, 190:5 | 116:18 | 171:9 | | |\n| recovered | registry
179:13 | remind | representation | | |\n| 102:12 | reinterpret | 77:3 | 25:14, 25:20, | | |\n| recovery | 141:24 | remote | 36:1,
48:8, | | |\n| 102:18, 102:21, | rejected | 1:12, 2:8 | 84:6,
85:14 | | |\n| 102:25, 120:7, | 57:11 | rendered | representations | | |\n| 173:20 | related | 29:25, 47:18 | 183:13
representative | | |\n| referenced | 162:3, 190:16 | rendering
37:19 | 55:1 | | |\n| 156:2, 163:9 | relation | renders | represented | | |\n| referred | 182:19 | 29:18, 36:17 | 35:5, 35:13, | | |\n| 16:24, 34:8 | relationship | renew | 48:21, 62:22, | | |\n| referring | 24:16, 82:21, | 154:3 | 71:19, 72:22, | | |\n| 32:5 | 83:7,
85:5, | renminbi | 88:22 | | |\n| refers | 85:10, 162:4, | 93:7, 93:17 | representing | | |\n| 160:24
refuse | 169:13, 181:22, | repeat | 25:25, 47:21, | | |\n| | 182:1 | 11:6, 73:14, | 48:1, 48:4, | | |\n| 12:23, 68:3,
68:7, 68:17 | relative | 119:1, 127:17, | 49:11, 77:18, | | |\n| refusing | 155:17 | 141:18, 141:19, | 77:19, 92:21 | | |\n| | relevance | 141:21, 151:19 | represents | | |\n| 12:13, 13:20,
24:24, 37:12, | 60:17, 72:6, | repeating | 25:23, 26:18 | | |\n| | | 150:7 | | | |\n| | | | | | |\n| | | | | | |\n\n#### Case 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/199221137569861 dPage 81 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n80\n\n| | | - | |\n|------------------|--------------------|-----------------|----------------------------|\n| republic | 50:5,
50:15, | retained | revised |\n| 57:1 | 50:20, 67:14, | 157:2, 158:2 | 124:2, 124:8, |\n| request | 74:8,
75:17, | retainer | 125:1, 142:21, |\n| 87:18, 127:2, | 75:25, 76:13, | 26:12 | 188:20 |\n| 131:14, 140:6, | 76:23,
90:2, | retaliate | revolution |\n| 142:22, 143:22 | 91:5,
109:17, | 94:11 | 12:5 |\n| requested | 118:6, 119:9, | return | ria |\n| | 119:14, 120:9, | | |\n| 68:21, 185:2 | 120:15,
130:8, | 42:10, 42:17, | 110:25,
111:2, |\n| requests | 139:3,
135:12, | 46:7,
46:17, | 111:10, 111:12, |\n| 124:3, 124:8, | 143:12,
143:21, | 67:10, 131:18, | 111:18, 111:24, |\n| 124:11, 124:15, | 161:21,
159:15, | 134:13, 134:16, | 112:6 |\n| 139:3, 145:23, | 163:4, | 181:9 | ridiculous |\n| 188:20 | 162:22, | returns | 61:13, 160:8 |\n| required | 164:16,
169:16, | 38:23, 39:3, | right |\n| 7:1,
42:18, | 171:14, 171:24, | 40:11, 43:8, | 11:2, 17:3, |\n| 69:1, 70:16, | 183:20, 185:8, | 43:12, 44:2, | 21:25, 26:25, |\n| 70:19, 70:23, | 185:17 | 44:4, 44:22, | 28:4, 33:18, |\n| 71:3, 73:17 | responded | 74:4, 181:5 | 35:16, 41:17, |\n| requirements | 86:2 | reveal | 43:7, 60:8, |\n| 72:24 | responding | 16:6, 19:16, | 77:4, 79:5, |\n| requires | 109:18, 171:5 | 20:8, 20:12, | 79:7, 79:23, |\n| 71:9, 71:15 | responds | 25:5, 26:9, | 81:1,
85:16, |\n| reservation | 171:10 | 26:23, 28:16, | 89:1,
93:21, |\n| 161:10 | response | 28:19, 31:24, | 94:4, 111:4, |\n| reserved | 140:6, 142:21, | 52:2, 68:23, | 118:21, 125:7, |\n| 4 : 1 1 | 143:22, 171:3, | 69:20, 69:23, | 126:1, 130:9, |\n| residence | 171:8 | 70:6, 70:10, | 131:13, 132:10, |\n| 22:4, 77:4, | responses | 90:17, 103:15, | 138:9, 142:10, |\n| 81:1 | 124:1, 124:7, | 103:22, 104:1, | 144:15, 148:3, |\n| respect | 170:13, 188:18 | 122:7, 143:1, | 152:10, 170:20, |\n| 27:23, 67:23, | responsibility | 144:2, 152:1, | 172:8, 183:5 |\n| | 135:5 | 164:3, 165:9, | rights |\n| 155:22, 162:2, | responsible | 165:10, 166:15, | 12:9, 12:21, |\n| 162:4, 175:12 | 113:15, 134:25, | 167:8, 167:12 | 24:20,
30:5, |\n| respected | 135:1, 145:17, | revealing | 31:4,
30:20, |\n| 91:23 | 146:10 | 16:11, 31:22, | 37:8,
31:13, |\n| respective | responsive | 63:9,
64:5, | 38:2, 38:15, |\n| 4:5 | 95:12,
96:7, | 90:21, 104:4, | 40:5,
40:19, |\n| respond | 108:24, 127:24, | 122:9, 152:3, | 41:6,
42:4, |\n| 12:8, 12:20, | 134:22, 145:23, | 163:16, 164:5, | 42:14, 44:13, |\n| 24:20, 30:4, | 147 : 11 | 173:11 | 45:2,
45:12, |\n| 31:12, 37:8, | | revenue | 45:24, 46:11, |\n| 38:2, 38:15, | restraint | | |\n| 40:4,
41:6, | 161:1, 161:6 | 40:24, 41:24, | 46:21,
48:12,
49:17, |\n| 42:3, 42:13, | restricted | 42:10, 45:19, | 50:6, |\n| 44:12,
45:1, | 53:25 | 46:18, 49:25 | 50:19, 67:15, |\n| 45:11,
45:24, | result | review | 67:20,
74:9, |\n| 46:20,
46:10, | 113:8 | 16:20, 20:14, | 75:18,
76:1, |\n| 48:11,
49:16, | retain | 43:8 | 76:14, 76:24, |\n| | 26:2 | | |\n| | | | |\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 82 of LMNOPQRSTUVTSWXYZT[\\]^\\_U`aObcWdTP]efOgSdhRZhRP\\MiOZR\\_jkR 92\n\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36
Page 82 of
LMNOPQRSTUVTSWXYZT[\\]^_U`aObcWdTP]efOgSdhRZhRP\\MiOZR_jkR
92 | | | | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| | #\\$%&'(\\$)*+,-.,/%&0/,1 | | | |\n| | 2,&34(+53,&6*\\$)789:;:8 | | | <8 |\n|
|
!
|
\"
\"
\"
\"
\"
|
\"
\"
\"
\"
\"
\"!
\"!
\"
\"
| |\n| | | | | |\n\n### =>6?@#A@=BC <<6?@#A@=BCD2BK\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/09/22/2113:56:18 3 dPage 83 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n100:23, 108:12, 105:23, 135:24, severe 93:1, 93:5, 111:3, 112:25, 177:6, 180:8, 131:5 93:8, 93:12, 114:25, 123:11, 181:23, 182:1 sexual 93:13, 93:19, sentenced 125:24, 94:4, 94:5, 124:10, 110:23, 112:2, 128:19, 130:13, 66:20 94:6, 94:12, 112:6 130:25, 132:9, 94:22, 95:6, separate shall 132:23, 133:24, 95:25, 96:23, 45:14, 79:22 4:10 134:13, 140:14, separately shares 97:19, 97:25, 142:3, 144:14, 99:2, 109:6, 143:3, 168:3 130:15. 160:1. 146:1, 149:11, 110:4, 110:7, september 160:25, 161:19 149:16, 153:15, 111:17, 112:12, 67:7, 67:8, sherry 113:12, 113:14, 179:22, 181:21, 99:10, 100:14, 22:2 183:3 113:15, 114:18, 172:13, 183:8 sherry-netherland seeing 115:1, 115:17, serious 52:14, 52:17, 124:13 116:3, 116:8, 87:15, 101:7, 55:5, 53:9, seek 129:20, 129:23, 157:18 77:4, 81:1 130:13, 130:18, 146:25, 154:3 seriously shoot 130:21, 131:12, seem 86:10, 88:9 43:6 135:17, 140:3, 32:15, 110:22, served short 144:16, 145:9, 147:23 123:3 21:13 145:15, 145:16, seems service shot 146:1, 146:7, 148:12 40:25, 42:10, 150:5 149:13, 146:9, seen 45:19, 46:18, should 149:20, 149:24, 22:21, 23:2, 66:6 15:4, 16:15, 153:18, 179:24, 32:15, 52:9, services 47:22, 54:10, 181:22, 182:4, 111:10, 122:16, 29:18, 29:25, 54:11, 62:24, 182:10, 182:18, 123:12, 133:3, 36:17, 37:19, 104:1, 106:6, 184:17, 184:20 138:23, 139:23, 47:17 111:23, 125:25, shuiyan's 177:3 session 127:12, 130:8, 77:18, 92:12, sees 62:13, 154:15 135:21, 141:11, 96:12, 96:19, 28:10 set 142:5, 145:16, 144:17, 153:17 self-incriminati-151:25, 157:19, 105:7, 124:3, sign on 161:12, 164:3, 124:8, 124:23, 24:13, 25:1, 13:4, 41:15 125:2, 188:20, 182:7 33:5, 32:20, send show 189:6, 190:11, 39:3, 33:11, 29:12, 36:16, 190:21 22:7, 60:8 91:21, 92:1, 37:14, 51:11, sets showed 126:15, 127:8, 51:14, 51:15, 105:3 89:17, 91:24, 180:23 54:2, 99:7, settled 122:11, 128:11 signature 130:23, 177:8, 172:11 showing 23:2, 23:4, 181:24 settlement 60:21 23:7, 24:3, sending shown 172:4 125:5, 125:6 61:24, 99:5 111:13, seven 19:8, signature-p1kal sends 111:21, 153:21 46:6, 46:15 190:22 56:5 shuiyan several signed sent 1:4, 78:14, 72:12, 95:1, 4:15, 4:17, 18:15, 51:13, 86:13, 87:10. 132:12, 142:18, 24:7, 32:19, 52:13, 54:17, 150:14 92:13, 92:21,\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n### Case 22:5007:20-DoO516231KPFileDd3/119/2254EnteFieedO3113722113:569864 dPage 84 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 32:25, 33:2, | 36:14, 42:25, | 39:17,
43:6, | 175:15 |\n|--------------------------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-------------------------|\n| | 54:7, | | |\n| 33:8, 33:14, | 53:21,
54:12, 59:16, | 58:25,
83:6,
99:25, | spread |\n| 125:12, 125:19, | | 108:10, | 131:16 |\n| 126:5, 126:25
signing | 72:3, 79:24,
79:25, 83:17, | 109:11,
112:3,
123:21, 155:2, | spreading |\n| 32:23 | 93:20,
83:18, | 164:13 | 94:1, 94:10, |\n| silvestri | 93:21,
97:8, | sort | 114:8,
114:19, |\n| 48:18 | 100:1, 100:14, | 55:3, 84:10, | 131:4, 131:20,
135:3 |\n| simple | 106:9, 106:12, | 126:11, 149:22 | |\n| 75:13, 107:6, | 126:11, 129:4, | sought | spy
110:5 |\n| | 149:7, 149:12, | 114:3, 136:6 | |\n| 151:3, 151:4 | 149:15, 154:20, | sounds | ਟ ਟੈ
190:3 |\n| simply | 166:5, 166:6, | 7 : 4 | |\n| 137:9 | 173:1, 176:25 | source | st |\n| simultaneous | somebody | | 32:13 |\n| 11:5, 40:16, | 23:8 | 55:8, 116:15, | stability |\n| 72:14,
95:14, | somehow | 183:16, 184:2 | 93:23 |\n| 96:8, 109:13, | 150:21 | sources | start |\n| 112:8, 121:10, | someone | 57:6, 116:19 | 182:5, 182:7, |\n| 133:16, 133:21, | 55:15, 62:1, | south | 182:16 |\n| 134:21, 135:6, | 92:20, 107:6, | 160:16, 161:13 | started |\n| 136:9, 138:4, | 115:1, 152:16, | southern | 108:12, 108:13, |\n| 138:16, 154:6, | 178:11 | 1:2,
6:12, | 108:15, 183:7 |\n| 165:3, 165:7,
166:2 | somethinq | 155:24, 169:24 | starting |\n| simultaneously | 20:2, 25:8, | speak | 18:16, 72:24, |\n| 154:18 | 48:25, 56:11, | 105:21 | 109:8 |\n| | | | |\n| | | speaking | starts |\n| since | 76:5,
86:16, | 10:24,
85:23, | 121:14 |\n| 65:24, 97:21, | 95:16, 95:17, | 138:10, 147:12, | state |\n| 110:22, 116:2, | 128:24, 141:10, | 183:18 | 9:18, 10:2, |\n| 124:12, 174:6 | 152:18, 152:21, | special | 12:18, 13:21, |\n| single | 165:17, 166:17, | 55:9 | 13:23, 15:25, |\n| 169:7 | 166:25, 168:25 | specific | 32:24, 33:20, |\n| sir | sometimes | 102:5, 142:20 | 36:22, 38:22, |\n| 6:8, 131:22 | 54:1,
54:20, | specifically | 40:10,
40:25, |\n| situation | 54:24,
54:22, | 20:25,
21:4, | 43:20,
44:10, |\n| 104:14 | 56:15, 56:16, | 158:6, 179:6 | 46:8,
45:8, |\n| small | 57:10, 75:1, | speculation | 46:17, 57:22, |\n| 146:17 | 76:9, 77:7, | 164:25 | 67:2,
67:11, |\n| social | 81:20, 99:12, | spell | 74:5, 190:2 |\n| 9:25, 11:13, | 99:13, 99:14, | 58:8, 58:10 | state s |\n| 11:24, 110:10 | 99:15, 99:17,
99:18 | spelled | 172:21 |\n| solely | somewhere | 18:5 | stated |\n| 162:7 | 157:14 | spelling | 35:2, 116:7, |\n| solemnly | son | 8:20, 11:10, | 133:1, 133:4 |\n| 5:13 | | 11:14, 11:18, | statement |\n| some | 80:8, 87:4,
87:24 | 11:21,
18:1 | 22:15, 22:19, |\n| 6:18, 9:14, | | spoken | 32:20, 136:4, |\n| 20:10, 22:25, | sorry | 63:10, 63:13, | 171:12, 171:20, |\n| | 32:13,
20:1, | | |\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n### Case 22:5007:20-DoO516231KPFiledd03/119/2254Enteried003113722113:569865 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021 submit ston\n\n| 188:9 | stop | submit | sure |\n|------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------|-----------------|\n| states | 19:20, 72:15, | 67:9, 102:16 | 6:19, 8:10, |\n| 1:1, 2:11, | 78:24,
78:22, | submitted | 36:15, 43:19, |\n| 7:24,
9:19, | 78:25, 79:2, | 74:5 | 54:8,
56:7, |\n| 10:5, 10:9, | 96:4, 114:5, | subscribed | 58:18, 100:21, |\n| 12:18, 13:24, | 131:3, 131:4, | 187:11 | 100:22, 106:7, |\n| 14:2, 14:8, | 131:19, 164:15 | subsequent | 111:1, 118:22, |\n| 14:12, 14:23, | stopped | 120:18 | 122:12, 122:14, |\n| 27:25,
28:13, | 20:2 | subsequently | 122:19, 123:12, |\n| 28:24,
29:3, | store | 87:8, 146:22 | 123:14, 123:19, |\n| 34:20,
34:14, | 128:2, 128:3, | substance | 125:8, 127:19, |\n| 45:19, 46:8, | 129:17 | 15:9 | 128:15, 139:22, |\n| 47:1,
66:17, | stored | successfully | 148:5, 148:20, |\n| 66:21,
67:4, | 97:4, 99:2 | 102:13 | 151:20, 165:1, |\n| 91:3, 107:18, | story | sue | 175:18, 183:21, |\n| 183:12, 190:8 | 149:7, 149:8 | 31:19, 51:25, | 186:7 |\n| stating | strange | 101:3, 101:14, | surrounding |\n| 134 : 6 | 168:23 | 112:12, 183:8 | 87:23 |\n| status | strategic | sued | suspend |\n| 10:8, 10:12, | 83:1, 83:2, | 110:23, 173:16 | 187:2 |\n| 10:20, 11:2, | 169:20 | suggested | suss |\n| 11:4, 11:7, 13:7 | strategy | 167:1, 167:2 | 78:7 |\n| steel | 167:9, 167:25, | suggestion | sussing |\n| 115:10 | 173:12, 173:14, | 86:6 | 78:15 |\n| steinberg | 173:23, 174:9 | suing | swear |\n| 174:11 | stream | 11:2 | 5 : 1 3 |\n| step | 128:8 | suit | swearing |\n| 60:25 | street | 6:10, 102:4, | 5:3 |\n| stepped | 32:13 | 110:25 | sworn |\n| 65:9 | strike | suite | 4:15, 4:18, |\n| steve | 9:16, 47:10, | 3:5, 3:13 | 6:3, 187:11, |\n| 84:17,
82:3, | 51:17, 55:22, | summer | 190:12 |\n| 85:6,
85:5, | 64:1, 66:25, | 81:13, 82:4 | system |\n| 85:10, 85:19
still | 75:5, 75:10, | superman | 58:6, 172:21, |\n| | 95:12, 102:2, | 154:22 | 175:1 |\n| 11:15, 19:23,
68:1, 68:6, | 106:4, 108:24, | supplement | ப |\n| 68:9, 83:9, | 120:2, 138:2, | 70:4, 117:1 | t-e-e-r |\n| 83:23, 83:25, | 138:17, 141:16, | support | 59:3 |\n| 105:17, 111:22, | 158:18, 179:11,
184:22, 185:23 | 91:22, 92:23, | t-mobile |\n| 165:16, 166:16, | strongly | 92:24, 93:22 | 61:6 |\n| 170:9, 174:6 | 87:18, 103:21 | supporters | table |\n| stipulate | stuff | 94:25 | 98:25 |\n| 5:2 | 118:15 | supporting | take |\n| stipulated | subject | 92:15 | 7:6, 12:3, |\n| 4:3, 4:8, 4:13 | 40:24, 41:11 | supportive | 31:19, 59:1, |\n| stipulation | submissions | 116:14 | 66:8, 84:21, |\n| 172:12, 175:3 | 79:16 | supposed | 84:24, 84:25, |\n| | | 73:2 | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n#### Case 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/119922113756g866 dPage 86 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n85\n\n| | | - | |\n|------------------|--------------------|-----------------|-------------------|\n| 97:18, 102:6, | 74:12,
181:5, | 110:3, 165:17, | 93:17 |\n| 110:19, 120:24, | 181:9 | 165:20, 167:3, | thing |\n| 135:5, 153:4, | taxes | 182:22 | 8:6, 21:1, |\n| 154:13, 155:3 | 43:21, 43:23, | ten | 34:18, 36:15, |\n| taken | 44:9, 44:16, | 15:14, 157:6, | 52:20,
62:3, |\n| 8:2
7:17, | 75:7 | 157:8 | 74:19,
87:22, |\n| takes | taxing | ten-minute | 100:23, 109:2, |\n| 85:7 | 40:25,
45:8 | 155:3 | 111:9,
115:17, |\n| taking | tea | tens | 123:7, 132:10, |\n| 12:12,
13:19, | 76:6 | 132:12, 133:13, | 133:24, 135:16, |\n| 37:11,
38:18 | teach | 134:2, 150:14, | 142:3,
146:23, |\n| talk | 179:24 | 150:22 | 147:3,
153:10, |\n| 6:16, 11:2, | team | term | 153:15, 157:17, |\n| 20:17, 32:1, | 55:10, 81:3 | 41:23, 119:17, | 158:25,
161:7, |\n| 84:9,
78:13, | teams | 128:14, 141:9, | 172:9 |\n| 142:5, 144:7, | 54:7 | 142:10, 151:3 | things |\n| 155:7, 167:10 | technician | testified | 54:2, 54:6, |\n| talked | 3:19, 18:17, | 6:3, 14:10, | 85:11,
84:13, |\n| 53:16, 101:22, | 18:20, 18:24, | 14:12, 14:22, | 133:25, 136:16, |\n| 135:19, 136:2, | 22:9,
43:1, | 25:9, 57:5, | 143:5, 143:6, |\n| 145:1, 145:3, | 106:7, 106:9, | 58:4, 66:10, | 143:7,
145:10, |\n| 145:10 | 106:18, 120:25, | 84:20, 107:20, | 146:13, 166:12, |\n| talking | 121:15,
122:21, | 180:15 | 183:4 |\n| 8:24, 16:23, | 123:22,
124:9 | testify | think |\n| 16:25, 33:7, | telephone | 74:14, 74:17, | 28:3, 32:16, |\n| 35:8, 35:24, | 60:22,
89:14 | 75:2,
84:23, | 32:25, 43:17, |\n| 36:4, 71:22, | tell | 84:25, 184:4, | 88:18,
100:18, |\n| 85:5,
93:22, | 17:11,
20:11, | 184:11, 184:14, | 115:11, 117:4, |\n| 98:15, 104:13, | 58:10,
34:15, | 184:23 | 118:15, 133:11, |\n| 112:24, 137:10, | 61:21,
74:1, | testimony | 141:8, 141:10, |\n| 141:2, 142:20, | 77:24,
77:13, | 14:11, 15:1, | 150:12, 157:18, |\n| 146:21, 150:3, | 86:10,
83:17, | 33:1,
44:19, | 165:19, 170:9, |\n| 156:14, 182:14, | 86:23,
103:4, | 85:2, 85:18, | 179:22, 181:17 |\n| 182:19 | 113:3,
115:16, | 190:14 | third-party |\n| targeting | 117:7,
141:7, | text | 44:16,
87:2, |\n| 55:13, 94:9 | 142:23, 147:4, | 63:3, 176:25 | 87:16 |\n| tax | 149:19, 153:10, | th | thought |\n| 38:23, 39:3, | 156:11, 156:15, | 22:2, 32:13, | 11:17, 85:22, |\n| 39:8, 40:10, | 165:16, 167:1, | 180:10 | 94:3, 166:4 |\n| 41:3, 42:10, | 167:3, 172:6, | thank | thousand |\n| 42:17, 43:8, | 174:8, 180:17, | 8:19, 18:14, | 142:4 |\n| 43:12, 44:2, | 182:8, 182:16, | 19:10, 24:1, | thousands |\n| 44:4, 44:22, | 182:18, 182:24 | 75:10, 78:22, | 54:16, 133:13, |\n| 44:23, 45:9, | telling | 89:9, 133:15, | 142:12 |\n| 45:21,
46:7, | 27:5, 33:8, | 138:25, 148:22, | threat |\n| 46:16, 67:10, | 83:5, 92:23, | 164:7, 167:19, | 53:23, 53:24, |\n| 73:23, 74:1, | 94:12, 95:6, | 170:5, 187:5 | 86:20, 87:1, |\n| 74:3, 74:4, | 95:8, 99:5, | therefore | 87:8, 87:15, |\n| | | 55:4, 55:6, | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 87 of MNOPQRSTUVWUTXYZ[U\\]^\\_`VabPcdXeUQ^fgPhTeiS[iSQ]NjP[Z`klS 92\n\n| Case 22-50073 | Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
MNOPQRSTUVWUTXYZ[U\\]^_`VabPcdXeUQ^fgPhTeiS[iSQ]NjP[Z`klS
92 | Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 | Page 87 of | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| | \\$%&'()%*+,-./-0&'10-2 | | | |\n| | 3-'45),64-'7+%*89:;<;9 | | | => |\n|
|
|
!
\"
|
#
#
\"
\"
| |\n| | | | | |\n\n### ?@7AB\\$CB?DE ===FGHHFHI>IJKKKF?@7AB\\$CB?DEF3DL\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012 12:56:18 88 of 92\n\n145:11 45:12, 45:25, 70:18, 71:3, 106:16 tweeters 46:11, 46:21, 71:14, 81:12, uploading 145:19 48:12, 49:17, 90:19, 103:24, 21:15, 21:20, 67:15, 143:8, 151:23, twitter 50:6, 21:23 67:20, 74:9, 162:8, 163:13, 99:4, upper 99:7, 75:18, 76:1, 163:25, 164:19, 109:4, 110:15, 61:2 76:14, 76:24, 165:12, 165:14, 150:3, 182:10, upstairs 182:19 90:3, 91:6, 165:15, 166:21 55:2 108:22, 118:7, understood two urqa 119:10, 119:15, 62:12, 74:13, 125:15 98:3, 101:17 119:25, 120:10, uneasy 107:21, 112:3, url 120:16, 125:13, 113:7, 154:13, 86:11, 86:18, 64:22. 64:23. 126:18, 149:17, 86:24 168:12 65:2 149:22, 159:14, union two-hour use 159:22, 160:2, 154:15 190:4 9:4, 9:6, 161:22, 162:23, tycoon united 16:17, 62:2, 163:5, 169:17, 160:18 1:1, 7:24, 89:13, 98:11, 171:15, 171:25, 9:19, 10:5, U 98:14, 104:6, 181:12, 184:5, 10:9, 12:17, 104:14, 104:16, ultimately 185:9, 185:18 13:24, 14:2, 104:25, 106:17 177:11 underlying 14:8, 14:12, useful una 80:22 14:23, 27:24, 148:13 3:20 understand 28:13, 28:24, usinq unable 7:12, 6:18, 29:3, 34:13, 65:2, 98:15, 27:9, 36:5, 7:14, 7:15, 34:20, 45:19, 128:8, 134:8 36:23, 52:25, 15:6, 8:16, 46:8, 47:1, usually 82:2, 126:14 24:6, 24:10, 66:21, 67:4, 34:5, 117:19, unaccountable 24:13, 26:14, 91 : 3 117:22 150:12 26:16, 29:15, unknown V unbelievable 29:16, 52:19, 59:16 54:17, 136:16 v 67:22, 68:1, unless uncomfortable 1:6 68:6, 68:9, 6:25, 7:9, 86:10, 86:19 value 68:19, 71:8, 84:5, 154:21 under 149:5, 149:9, 73:20, 113:1, unlike 5:6, 12:9, 150:13, 151:8, 128:19, 125:12, 129:20 151:24 12:17, 12:21, 138:8, 142:1, unlock 24:21, 27:18, valued 143:6, 143:20, 60:12 27:24, 29:8, 150:22, 151:12 154:1, 155:19, until various 30:2, 30:5, 169:23, 170:1, 135:9 30:20, 31:4, 151:24, 185:2 173:25, 175:18, update 31:13, 37:6, vegas 186:7, 186:12, 69:4 37:9, 37:25, 3:6, 93:18, 186:14, 186:22, updated 38:3, 38:6, 130:14 186:23 69:16 38:13, 38:16, vehicle understanding upload 40:5, 40:19, 161:14 13:7, 16:13, 58:6, 66:5, 41:2, 41:7, vendor 28:18, 19:6, 106:5, 106:15 42:4, 42:14, 41:10, 50:10, 32:9 uploaded 44:13, 45:2, verbal 68:25, 69:7, 42:25, 58:5, 95:24, 125:10\n\n### Transcript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012 12:56:18 9/12/2022 13:56:18 9 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\nverbally vision wanting 65:15, 86:1, 108:16 169:20 94:4, 183:22 55:2, 133:9 weren't verification visiting warfare 85:23 32:19, 178:7 92:21, 182:4 53:25, 55:12 verified voice west warrant 83:5 22:15, 22:19, 92:14, 92:24, 14:4 188: 9 94:21, 121:9 warrants western voices 18:11 verify 14:7 whatever 94:15 112:4 washington verizon 35:23, W 91:20 47:25, 61:4 53:17, 61:22, wasting w-e-n-q-u-i 180:2 108:19, 145:17, version 16:3 8:21, 17:16, 146:10, 159:6, 17:22, way wait 177:14, 185:13 124:14 5:10, 9:15, 19:19, 102:2, via whatsapp 10:11, 51:10, 118:4, 135:9, 98:19, 177:10, 177:10, 182:2 69:7, 70:18, 136:11 182:2 vicious 71:2, 83:21, waiting 112:15, 87:13, 87:24, whatsoever 114:6, 106:14 72:6, 101:23 131:4, 131:18 108:14, 111:13, waived whereabouts 129:9, 144:24, viciously 4:7 108:15 145:6, 145:20, 137:11 wang 146:6, 153:2, whereof viciousness 91:18, 92:12, 156:8, 183:7, 190:20 112:16 92:19, 93:3, 190:18 whether video 113:11, 175:5, ways 10:21, 12:24, 21:12, 21:14, 175:15, 175:19, 166:13 23:2, 25:19, 21:16, 58:5, 175:20, 176:11, wealthy 36:10, 38:21, 64:14, 66:5, 182:2 115:17, 129:23, 41:14, 39:6, 92:6, 92:8, want 92:10, 130:2, 130:3, 44:15, 54:8, 92:15, 8:5, 8:17, 54:10, 130:22 54:9, 94:14, 99:24, 27:2, 28:7, 103:18, 128:16, wearing 54:11, 73:23, 34:19, 34:22, 75:23 85:7, 122:4, 128:23 52:19, 58:16, 122:12, 123:12, week videoconference 71:25, 85:15, 125:8, 129:14, 59:11, 3:1 59:23, 86:9, 115:25, 148:14 videos 125:22, 126:5, 138:14, 140:3, whichever 127:8 21:13, 57:18, 126:15, 145:3, 147:3, welcome 49:8 58:2, 95:22, 147:12, 148:19, whistleblower 86:3, 103:14 98:24, 99:7 149:18, 151:21, 111:5 viewers wengui 175:18, 183:1, 134:3 1:7, 22:14, white 183:21 134:17 22:25, 23:7, violation wanted whoever 121:17, 122:24, 66:22 59:1, 77:17, 47:20 virginia 123:25, 124:21, 77:23, 78:11, 160:18, 180:9, whole 168:13, 178:10, 91:21, 117:9, 188:8, 188:13, 83:16, 174:4, 179:7, 180:25, 117:23, 133:1, 188:15, 188:17, 184:17 183:11 133:4, 165:17, 189:3 virus wife 182:23 went 82:25 77:10, 77:22, 9:13, 64:20,\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n# Case 22:5007:20-DoO516231KPFileDd3/119/2254EnteFieebO3412922113:56g860 dPage 90 of\n\n92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok\n\nConducted on April 1, 2021\n\n| 78:8, 80:4, | 20:1, 21:3, | wrapped | 170:24, 172:5, |\n|-----------------|------------------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------|\n| 87:24 | 21:6,
58:9, | 166:6 | 172:16, 173:1, |\n| wifi | 60:10, 70:1, | write | 173:3, 174:14, |\n| 129:5, 129:6 | 70:3, 70:10, | 185:1 | 174:22, 175:2, |\n| wilkinson | 72:8,
84:9, | writing | 175:10 |\n| 3:20 | 86:9,
86:4, | 128:20, 128:21, | な |\n| willy-nilly | 95:15, 96:10, | 182:19 | y-e-l-i-a-n-g |\n| 75:1 | 100:20, 106:14, | written | 152:19 |\n| wind | 111:20, 118:17, | 38:11, 110:16, | yang |\n| 118:20, 154:7, | 128:14, 139:20, | 110:17, 125:9, | 91:18 |\n| 154:9 | 141:15, 141:20, | 135:17, 140:2, | yanping |\n| window | 149:19, 187:5, | 171:5 | 175:5, 175:19 |\n| 118:18, 118:20, | 188:2, 190:10, | wrong | yeah |\n| 154:8, 154:9 | 190:14, 190:20 | 94:5, 142:10, | 81:16 |\n| wire | wolman's | 169:1, 172:7, | |\n| 129:6, 176:19, | 19:15 | 172:25, 179:16 | year |\n| 176:23 | won | wrote | 14:5, 29:9, |\n| wish | 120:4 | 132:24, 144:18 | 42:11, 43:23, |\n| 88:13, 88:14, | wonderful | X | 44:10, 181:6 |\n| 116:20, 181:18 | 167:20 | | years |\n| withdraw | woodbury | X | 15:14, 15:17,
40:23, 41:25, |\n| 137:12 | 101:18 | 166:17 | 46:6, 46:15, |\n| withdrawn | word | x-1 | 142:18 |\n| 137:18 | 26:7, 100:20, | 170:21 | |\n| withdrew | 151:4 | x-i-a | yes-or-no
20:5 |\n| 137:19 | words | 152:19 | yieliang |\n| withheld | 7:3, 96:1, | x-1-a-n-m-i-n | 8:4, 14:20 |\n| 70:14, 70:22, | 122:12, 134:8, | 152:23, 170:15 | yingnan |\n| 73:16 | 134:9, 146:5 | x-i-n-o | 110:2, 116:9 |\n| within | work | 170:23 | york |\n| 4:14, 41:24, | 23:20 | x-i-o-n-g | 2:11,
1:2, |\n| 60:14, 99:11, | worked | 152:23, 170:15
xi | 6:12, 10:2, |\n| 190:8 | 150:8, 154:25 | | 23:24, 24:14, |\n| without | working | 108:3, 182:15
xia | 25:10, 25:24, |\n| 16:11, 27:5, | 23:19, 23:20, | | 30:14, 30:16, |\n| 31:22, 63:9, | 23:21, 23:24, | 151:16, 152:17
xianmin | 31:1, 31:10, |\n| 64:5, 69:10, | 114:24, 115:14 | | 32:8, 32:12, |\n| 73:8, 103:12, | works | 151:17, 170:15, | 33:20, 38:9, |\n| 104:4, 104:19, | 136:13, 167:18 | 170:19, 170:24,
172:5, 172:16, | 38:12, 38:22, |\n| 122:9, 152:3, | world | | 39:1, 39:4, |\n| 160:13, 163:15, | | | |\n| | 54:18,
18:11, | 173:2, 173:3, | |\n| 163:21, 164:5, | 71:21,
95:1 | 174:14, 174:22, | 39:7, 39:11, |\n| 164:20, 164:22, | worry | 175:2, 175:10 | 39:14, 39:18, |\n| 165:17, 165:20, | 154:10 | xino | 39:24, 40:1, |\n| 167:3, 171:11, | worth | 170:22 | 40:14, 40:25,
43:20, 44:9, |\n| 173:9, 173:11, | 150:22, 153:3, | xiong | 45:8, 46:8, |\n| 173:20 | 163:2 | 151:17, 152:21, | 46:17, 49:22, |\n| witness | wouldn't | 170:15, 170:19, | |\n| 6:2, 14:18, | 122:19 | | |\n| | | | |\n\n#### Case 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/2012 11:56:18 1 0 Page 91 of 92\n\nTranscript of Howan Kwok Conducted on April 1, 2021\n\n131:19 22 49:24, 50:3, 1 50:23, 51:1, ા ୧ 66:9 1 55:25, 56:2, 187:6 23 79:13 56:22, 18 56:25, 179:14, 188:8 1.1 63:19, 67:11, 22:2, 24 80:15, 160:18 72:1, 74:6, 171:21, 180:10 124:6, 125:24, 1.4 120:2, 120:5, 1801 126:1, 126:3 108:4 120:13, 155:24, 22:2 25 10 162:5, 168:12, 1:-cv--kpf 44:7 2:5, 23:11, 169:25, 172:21, 1:6 26.1 23:15, 24:4, 176:2, 174:17, 22:16, 22:20, 2 25:1, 65:8 180:11, 190:8 188:10 2 100 york's 2764 102:8 96:16, 124:10, 175 : 1 3:5 124:14, 151:14, 20 youtube 2nd 151:17, 152:15, 1:6, 118:14, 92:14 190:21 152:20, 152:22, 157:10, 188:7 yuan 3 161:13, 173:16 2011 96:17, 151:13 10022 184:16 30 yvette 180:11 2017 21:7, 29:5 175:5, 175:20 101 67:7, 67:8, 31 Z 107:18 91:12, 99:24, 102:8 zip 107 111:5 360803 42:25 183:11, 188:11 2018 1:17 zoom 109 92:9, 92:11, 3733 106:17 3:5 97:24, 97:25, 171:10 0 12 99:10, 99:24, 39 99:25, 66:9 100:10, 00 79:13, 155:5 100:15, 103:19, 12,000 2:5, 127:23 4 104:15, 104:17, 178:17, 178:20, 001 4 107:2, 154:18, 178:23, 179:12, 18:16 155:5 160:17, 163:10, 179:18, 180:17, 003 40 177:2, 183:7, 180:23, 181:8 120:24 102:8 122 183:8 004 42,000 2019 188:12, 188:13 121:14 183:14, 183:16. 42:11, 171:22 123 005 184:15, 184:24, 188:15 2020 124:20 185:5 23:11, 23:15, 125 006 45 24:4, 43:24, 188:17, 189:3 123:20 66:9 44:10, 172:13, 13 007 5 179:5, 179:10, 107:18 22:8 50,000 179:14, 180:8, 14 008 181: 6 132:3 154:18, 163:10 122:20 2021 510 15 05678 1:13, 2:4, 160:1, 160:24 62:12, 99:23, 1:6 125:24, 187:13, રે રે 160:17, 172:13 09 190:22 155:5 15,000 79:13 20814 114:1, 131:2, 3:14\n\n### PLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 | WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n\n\n)#\\*+\",\\*#-! ./0121/ 3/\n\n| Case 22-50073 | Doc 102-1
Filed 03/19/22
Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36
Page 92 of |\n|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | DEFGHIJKLMNLKOPQRLSTUVWMXYGZ[O\\LHU]^G_K\\`JR`JHTEaGbJWcbJ
92 |\n| | !\"#\\$%#&'&#( | |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
| |
|---|
|","body_zh":"案号 22:50073:20000110173-KPMedi0301911812213:50ag6119122213:50ag61，第 92 页之第 61 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证言笔录\n\n日期：April 1, 2021 案件：Cheng -v- Guo\n\nPlanet Depos 电话：888-433-3767 传真：888-503-3767 电子邮箱：transcripts@planetdepos.com www.planetdepos.com\n\n全球法庭记录与诉讼技术\n\n案号 22GAR73:20Doc-0627B-KFWedD3d19122113:56ag6，第 92 页之第 2 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证言笔录，于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n（第 1 页，第 1 至 4 行）\n\n美利坚合众国联邦地区法院 出庭人员：（通过视频会议）\n\n纽约南区（Southern District of New York）\n\nRANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP（兰达扎法律集团）\n\nLOGAN CHENG（程翔燕，曾用名 Shuiyan Cheng）， 原告代理律师\n\n原告， 2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109\n\n1:20-cv-05678-KPF\n\n诉 Las Vegas, NV 89117\n\nMENGUI GUO（郭文贵）， 代理律师：JAY MARSHALL WOLMAN, ESQ.（杰伊·马歇尔·沃尔曼，律师）\n\n被告。 MARC RANDAZZA, ESQ.（马克·兰达扎，律师）\n\nSCHULMAN BHATTACHARYA, LLC（舒尔曼·巴塔查里亚有限责任公司）\n\nHOWAN KWOK（郭文贵）的远程证言录取 被告代理律师\n\nApril 1, 2021 7500 Old Georgetown Rd, Suite 901\n\nBethesda, Maryland 20814\n\n记录人： 代理律师：JEFFREY GAVENMAN, ESQ.（杰弗里·加文曼，律师）\n\nMARY F. BOWMAN, RPR, CRR（玛丽·F·鲍曼）\n\n工作编号：360803\n\n其他出席人员：\n\nJuliet Hooper（朱丽叶·胡珀），文件技术员\n\nUna Wilkinson（尤娜·威尔金森），普通话口译员\n\nApril 1, 2021\n\n10:00 a.m.\n\n双方当事人各自的律师特此约定并同意，免除提交及密封手续。\n\n在 Mary F. Bowman（玛丽·F·鲍曼）面前对 HOWAN KWOK（郭文贵）进行远程证言录取；Mary F. Bowman 为纽约州及新泽西州的注册专业记录员、实时记录认证员及公证人。\n\n双方进一步约定并同意，除对问题形式提出的异议外，其他一切异议均保留至审判时提出。\n\n双方进一步约定并同意，本证言可在任何有权主持宣誓的官员面前宣誓并签署，其效力与在法院面前签署及宣誓相同。\n\n案号 22G0073:20Doc-0627B-KFWedD3c10M22t 5ErfterEddBl11912213:56ag6，第 92 页之第 3 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证言笔录\n\n（第 2 页，第 5 至 8 行）\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n记录员：律师是否同意，以要求口译员确认其口译将在伪证处罚的约束下如实进行的方式，代替正式让口译员宣誓；律师不会基于以该方式进行而对笔录的可采性提出异议。\n\n加文曼律师：同意。\n\n沃尔曼律师：同意。\n\n记录员：您是否庄严宣誓或确认，您将在本次证言录取中作出的口译，将尽您所能从英语译为普通话，并从普通话译为英语？\n\n口译员：我愿意。\n\nHOWAN KWOK（郭文贵）经双方当事人传唤作为证人，并经依法宣誓后，作证如下：\n\n沃尔曼律师询问：\n\n问：早上好，Kwok 先生。\n\n答：先生，早上好。\n\n问：我叫 Jay Wolman（杰伊·沃尔曼），代表 Logan Cheng（程翔燕）先生；他是在纽约南区联邦地区法院对您提起的诉讼中的原告。\n\n我们今天有一位口译员，由其将我的问题向您口译，并将您的回答口译给我们。由于在场人数较多，我们不能彼此同时说话。\n\n即使您懂一些英语，也请确保您听取经口译的问题，并以您的母语作答，以确保我们之间的交流尽可能准确。\n\n今天在场的还有您的律师 Gavenman（加文曼）先生，他可能会提出某些异议。但除非他指示您不要回答，作为一般原则，您仍须回答我的问题。您的回答必须以言语作出，而非点头或声音，以确保我们获得本程序的准确笔录。\n\n如果您在任何时候需要休息，请告诉我，我们会安排休息。但我要求您回答任何尚未回答的问题，除非是为了就特权主张与您的律师协商。\n\n如果您不理解某个问题，请不要猜测。我很乐意尝试重新表述。\n\n您明白吗？\n\n答：是，我明白。\n\n问：您此前是否曾接受过证言录取？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：多少次？\n\n答：我记不清了。\n\n问：超过五次吗？\n\n答：有可能。\n\n问：那些是在美国的程序中进行的吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能否回忆起任何您曾接受证言录取的具体案件？\n\n答：Pacific Alliance（太平洋联盟）。以及 Guo Baosheng（郭宝胜）诽谤案和 Ha Yieliang（夏业良）诽谤案。\n\n问：在我们继续之前，我想澄清一件事。您在我们开始前说，您的名字是 Howan Kwok。这正确吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：我可以听您念一下您的姓氏吗？这样我可以确保正确称呼您并正确发音。\n\n答：K-W-O-K。\n\n问：我可以听您说一下您的姓氏吗？\n\n答：K-W-O-K——O-K，H-O-W-A-N，那是我的名字。\n\n问：我明白。我不是在问这个问题。我想听您说一下您的姓氏。\n\n答：Kwok。\n\n问：Kwok。谢谢。现在，本诉讼将您的姓名拼写为 W-E-N-G-U-I, G-U-O。您熟悉这个名字吗？\n\n加文曼律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：这是您使用的名字吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您为何使用该名字？\n\n答：这是因为 K-W-O-K 和 G-U-O 实际上是同一个汉字的发音，一个是中国大陆的发音，一个是香港的发音。\n\n问：您的名字中名的拼写是什么，您在庇护申请中使用的拼写是什么？\n\n答：H-O-W-A-N, K-W-O-K。\n\n问：名字呢？\n\n答：因为我去香港时，该名字在某种意义上与他人重复，所以我改了名字。\n\n问：您之前提到一张拼写不同的社会保障卡，对吗？\n\n答：不，仍是同一个名字，H-O-W-A-N, K-W-O-K。\n\n问：我以为我听到您提到拼写 H-A-Y-U-N，对吗？\n\n答：不，我一直说的是 H-O-W-A-N。\n\n问：您是否曾将 H-A-O-Y-U-N 用作您的名字拼写？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：现在，您提到了社会保障卡。您是否受雇？\n\n答：我一直是很多公司的顾问。我目前的工作是——我从事广播，并致力于推翻中国共产党。这是一场广播革命。\n\n问：您从该工作中获得多少报酬？\n\n加文曼律师：根据律师建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法第五修正案》所规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：Kwok 先生，您是否采纳您律师的建议并拒绝回答该问题？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您目前是否因任何美国州政府或联邦政府的任何犯罪而受到起诉？\n\n加文曼律师：根据 Guo 先生律师的建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法第五修正案》所规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n沃尔曼律师：Jeff，他不能拒绝回答是否存在起诉。\n\n加文曼律师：没有理由谈论移民身份，对吗？\n\n您可以问这个问题，但如果您进一步询问移民身份——\n\n（同时交谈）\n\n问：我再问一遍，Kwok 先生，您的移民身份是什么？\n\n答：我正在申请——正在申请政治庇护。\n\n问：您是否持有由美国联邦政府或州政府签发的身份证明文件？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：该身份证明文件是什么？\n\n答：Howan，H-O-W-A-N。\n\n问：我再问一遍。该身份证明文件是什么？\n\n答：社会保障卡。\n\n问：您是否持有纽约州签发的驾驶执照？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否持有美国国土安全部签发的外国人身份证明文件？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您在美国的移民身份是什么？\n\n加文曼律师：异议。Jay，这与他的移民身份有何关联？您要去哪里——我的意思是，这确实不是一条特别适当的询问路线。\n\n我不一定会指示他不要回答这个问题，但我不知道我们为什么要沿着有关其移民身份的路径继续询问。\n\n沃尔曼律师：为确定他是否有身份证明卡。\n\n加文曼律师：好的，所以我们可以——\n\n沃尔曼律师：并且不要作出说明性异议，律师。\n\n要么政府正在起诉，要么没有。\n\n内华达州案件？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我们现在正在讨论的内华达州案件。\n\n答：他们曾经简要地通过翻译向我讲解过一次那份起诉状。我自己无法阅读，因为我不懂英语。\n\n问：您熟悉英文字母吗？\n\n答：是的。\n\n答：我知道字母表。\n\n问：您能够分辨字母“G-U-O”和“K-W-O-K”之间的区别吗？\n\n答：能。\n\n问：在内华达州提交该起诉状之前，您是否看过该起诉状的英文版本？\n\n口译员：律师，您问的是他在提交起诉状之前是否读过该起诉状吗？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：他是否在内华达州提交该起诉状之前看过该起诉状的英文版本。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否在任何时候注意到，其中并未以 K-W-O-K 的拼写方式载有您的姓名？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否注意到，该内华达州起诉状中始终将该姓名拼写为 G-U-O？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Miles Kwok（郭文贵）这个名字是什么？\n\n答：嗯，因为任何在西方世界经营或生活的中国人，都会有一个加上姓氏的英文名字，那就是 Kwok。\n\n问：谢谢。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：现在，Hooper 女士，我向您发送了一份从 001 开始的文件。\n\n技术人员：好的，律师，您希望将其显示在屏幕上吗？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：是，请。\n\n技术人员：您希望将其标记为证物吗？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：让我们将其标记为证物 1。\n\n技术人员：请稍候。\n\n好的，该文件已显示在屏幕上。\n\n（证物 1，经修订的证言通知书，截至本日标记供识别。）\n\n问：Kwok 先生，据您所知和理解，您今天出席是否系根据作为证物 1 所示的经修订证言通知书？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：谢谢。您可以关闭该文件。\n\nKwok 先生，您为今天的证言做了什么准备？我不需要知道您与您的律师讨论了什么。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我理解 Wolman 律师的澄清，但请不要披露任何律师—当事人沟通。\n\n您可以仅概括说明我们做了什么。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我没有说——等等，停下。请不要改变我的问题。我没有说“概括地”。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：好的。\n\n口译员：我仍然需要翻译律师刚才所说的话。好的。\n\n答：是。然后我的——\n\n口译员：抱歉，证人刚才说了一些话后停下了，因此我只是向他确认他在说什么。\n\n答：我只是说“是”。\n\n问：那不是一个“是”或“否”的问题。您为今天做了什么准备？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：再次提醒您，不要在回答中披露任何律师—当事人沟通。\n\n答：我在出庭前做了一些通常的准备，但我不能再告诉您更多，因为那将披露我的律师与我本人之间讨论过的内容。\n\n问：您是否审阅过任何文件以准备今天的证言？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：除您的律师外，您是否与任何人谈过此次证言？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：除本屏幕上的人员外，是否有任何人知道您今天正在接受证言？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您是否告诉过任何人您今天正在接受证言？\n\n答：我没有具体告诉任何人，但问题是，我每天都会进行直播，在直播期间我说过我将作为证人，但我没有具体说是哪一个案件。\n\n问：您在哪一次直播中说您将作为证人？\n\n答：是在 9:30 的 GTV 节目中。\n\n问：今天早上？\n\n答：那不是直播。实际上只是制作视频。就像那些一分钟的短视频——大约九分钟的视频。但在九分钟之后，我们会进行一分钟的上传。因此，就是那种视频制作。\n\n问：您说“我们”。“我们”是谁？\n\n答：我没有说“我们”。我说的是“我”。\n\n问：是否有人协助您进行该录制和上传？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您从哪里进行该录制和上传？\n\n答：是在同一把椅子、同一张桌子和同一个背景。就在这里。\n\n问：那是哪里？\n\n答：1801 Sherry Netherland，18th floor。\n\n问：那是您的住所吗？\n\n答：我住在这里。它不是我的，但我住在这里。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我要向您展示——Hooper 女士，一份从 007 开始的文件。\n\n技术人员：好的，请稍候。\n\n您希望将其标记为证物 2 吗？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：是，请。该文件已显示在屏幕上。\n\n（证物 2，被告 Wengui Guo（郭文贵）根据地方民事规则 26.1 作出的经核实声明，截至本日标记供识别。）\n\n问：Guo 先生，该文件称其为您根据地方民事规则 26.1 作出的经核实声明。您以前见过这份文件吗？\n\n答：所以，您看，我只能识别 Wengui Guo，即我的名字，以及一些阿拉伯数字。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：请向下滚动。\n\n答：但现在您向下滚动后，我可以看到我的签名。我不知道我以前是否见过这份文件。\n\n问：这是您的签名吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您记得——\n\n答：这是我的签名，Guo Wengui（郭文贵）。\n\n问：您熟悉一个名叫 Daniel Podhaskie 的人吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您在哪里认识他？\n\n答：Daniel Podhaskie，他是工作中的律师。他是一名律师，在工作——工作。\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生是您的律师吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：他为 New York Golden Spring 工作。\n\n问：谢谢。您是否有任何理由相信，这不是您于 December 10, 2020 签署的签名？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您在签署前是否理解这份文件？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您如何能够理解它？\n\n答：因为每次在我理解文件、在我签署之前，他都会找一名翻译翻译这些文件。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 是什么？\n\n答：它是一家公司。\n\n问：您与该公司是什么关系？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据 Guo 先生的个人律师的建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法第五修正案》项下的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否接受您律师的建议并拒绝回答该问题？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在 December 10，您是否在 Golden Spring 的律师 Podhaskie 先生在场的情况下签署了这份文件？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我要提醒您，不要在回答中披露任何律师—当事人沟通。\n\n问：在我们继续之前，我需要确定一件事。\n\n您作证称 Podhaskie 先生是 Golden Spring New York 的律师。他也是您的律师吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您与 Podhaskie 先生是否有代理协议？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：这是我与我的律师之间的事情，因此我不能回答。\n\n问：您可以回答您是否有代理协议。\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您怎么知道 Podhaskie 先生代表您个人，而不仅仅是 Golden Spring New York？\n\n答：因为他一直代表我。\n\n问：您何时首次聘请 Podhaskie 先生？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生以何种目的代表您个人？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：由于其中使用了“目的”一词，我必须提醒您，不要在回答中披露任何律师—当事人沟通。\n\n答：我的回答是，他是一名律师。\n\n问：您是否以一般性聘任方式聘请他，处理任何及所有目的？\n\n答：我不理解您说“一般性”是什么意思，什么叫一般性或非一般性？我不理解。\n\n问：让我尝试澄清。\n\nGavenman 先生在本案中作为被告的代理人代表您。Podhaskie 先生以何种目的代表您？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我将对问题形式提出异议，并再次提醒您不要在回答中披露任何律师—当事人沟通。\n\n答：没错。这就是为什么我不知道该如何回答您的问题。我确实不知道如何回答。而且我确实不想不负责任地回答，以致与本案无关。\n\n问：在不告诉我您与 Podhaskie 先生进行的任何谈话内容的情况下，他以何种身份代表您？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不能——我——我无法回答这个问题。我无法回答这个问题。\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生是否在任何诉讼中代表您？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生是否就您曾援引《美国宪法第五修正案》特权的任何事项代表您？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：是否有任何律师就您曾援引《美国宪法第五修正案》特权的任何事项代表您？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：您包括刚刚发生的这一起吗？\n\n口译员：律师，我认为那是问您的问题，对吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：本诉讼显然是其中之一。\n\n您希望将其作为回答的一部分，还是——\n\nWOLMAN 律师：他可以按其认为适当的方式回答。\n\n答：我的律师在这里，我的法律顾问 Jeff。\n\n问：您是否在任何其他诉讼中援引过《美国宪法第五修正案》的保护？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我将再次提醒他，不要披露有关此事的任何律师—当事人沟通。我认为您的理解可能来自该等沟通。因此，请不要披露任何律师—当事人沟通。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您在其他哪些诉讼中援引过《美国宪法第五修正案》的保护？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：在本月之前，您上一次援引《美国宪法第五修正案》保护是什么时候？\n\n我所说的本月，是指过去 30 天。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：除本诉讼外，您是否在过去一年中援引过第五修正案？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生是否以您的名义发送账单？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不理解您的问题。我不太理解。\n\n问：您是否收到 Podhaskie 律师就其向您提供的服务所开具的账单？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您是否向 Podhaskie 先生付款？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：谁向 Podhaskie 先生付款？\n\n答：Golden Spring。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据 Guo 先生律师的建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法第五修正案》项下的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否接受您律师不回答的建议？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是 Golden Spring New York limited 的高级职员吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据 Guo 先生律师的建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法第五修正案》项下的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否接受您律师不回答的建议？\n\n答：没错。\n\n问：Golden Spring 或与其有关联的任何人是否参与了在内华达州起诉 Cheng 先生的决定？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：在您能够不披露律师—当事人沟通的范围内，您可以回答，但我——\n\n问：为什么 Golden Spring（戈尔登斯普林公司）为以个人身份向您提供服务的 Podhaskie 先生（波德哈斯基先生）支付费用？\n\n问：告诫您不要披露律师/当事人之间的沟通。\n\n加文曼律师：根据郭先生个人律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n答：我确实就此事与我的律师谈过，因此，由于这会涉及律师与当事人之间的保密特权，所以我不能回答这个问题。\n\n问：您是否接受您律师不回答的建议？\n\n问：您指的是哪位律师？\n\n答：是。\n\n答：Daniel（丹尼尔）。\n\n问：您是否知道 Cheng 先生（程先生）在 Nevada（内华达州）获得了针对您的判决？\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生是受雇于 Golden Spring New York（戈尔登斯普林纽约公司），还是一名独立的外部服务提供者？\n\n答：据我所知，是的。\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您是否知道，该判决是由 Golden Spring New York 代表您支付的？\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 的办公室在哪里？\n\n答：是。\n\n答：61st Street——抱歉，64th Street。\n\n问：为什么 Golden Spring New York 代表您支付该判决？\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生的办公室在哪里？\n\n加文曼律师：根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n答：我似乎曾在 Golden Spring 的办公室见过他，但我认为他可能也有其他办公室。不过我不知道那些办公室在哪里。\n\n问：您是否接受您律师的建议？\n\n问：在您签署标记为 Exhibit 2 的核证声明当天，您为什么在 Golden Spring 签署该文件？\n\n答：正是如此。\n\n加文曼律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n问：您是否在 Golden Spring 中拥有任何权益？\n\n答：我不记得在 Golden Spring 签署过该文件。我从未说过我是在 Golden Spring 签署该文件的。我认为您可能误解了我的证词。我从未说过我是在 Golden Spring 签署该文件的。\n\n问：您还有除 Podhaskie 先生和 Gavenman 先生（加文曼先生）之外的其他律师吗？\n\n问：您在哪里与 Podhaskie 先生会面以签署该文件？\n\n加文曼律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我的回答是我不记得。您为什么要胡说八道，并告诉我我是在 Golden Spring 签署的？我说过我不记得。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Podhaskie 先生是否打印了供您签署的文件？\n\n问：那些其他律师是谁？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n加文曼律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n问：您是否打印了作为 Exhibit 2 的待签署文件？\n\n答：我不记得他们的名字，因为如果他们的名字是英文，我通常记不住。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n例如，就像我今天的律师一样，您可能用另一个名字称呼该律师，但我实际上只知道他叫 Jeff（杰夫）。我只称他为 Jeff。\n\n问：您为什么选择 Podhaskie 先生对该文件进行公证？\n\n但这很自然，因为我的英文阅读能力可能相当于美国任何一个一岁儿童的水平。\n\n答：嗯，依法，是吧？\n\n问：您能否尽您所能告诉我他们的名字？\n\n问：我的问题是，为什么选择 Podhaskie 先生，而不是 New York State（纽约州）的任何其他公证人？\n\n加文曼律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我信任他。\n\n答：问题是，我确实不想弄错——例如，把美国总统 Biden 先生（拜登先生）的名字说成是我的律师的名字。\n\n问：您目前是否在任何事项中由一名名叫 Aaron Mitchell（艾伦·米切尔）的律师代理？\n\n我确实不想犯这种错误。弄错任何人的名字并将其说成是我的律师，会是相当不负责任的，而且——我宁愿只说——\n\n加文曼律师：不只是本案，Jay（杰伊）？您是在谈论任何其他事项吗？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n沃尔曼律师：请不要替他回答问题。您现在是在替他回答问题。\n\n问：请尽您所能按原问题作答。\n\n加文曼律师：好的。他在本案中由律师代理——\n\n答：我的回答是否定的，我想不起来。\n\n沃尔曼律师：如果您有异议，就提出异议。现在您——\n\n问：您是否与 Aaron Mitchell 签有代理协议？\n\n加文曼律师：试图澄清问题。\n\n答：我不知道您指的是哪位律师，您指的是哪位律师。我无法回答这个问题。\n\n沃尔曼律师：您不是被询问人。\n\n问：您是否知道，一名名叫 Aaron Mitchell 的律师已代表您在本案中提交出庭代理声明？\n\n答：嗯，目前我至少知道三名名字叫 Aaron 的律师。因此，我实际上记不起您所说的 Aaron 是哪一位。这就是为什么我无法回答。这就是为什么我说我不记得。\n\n答：我知道有一名叫 Aaron 的律师，但我并不真正知道是否有 Aaron Mitchell，还是怎么回事。我就是不知道。\n\n问：您是否与这名叫 Aaron 的律师签有费用协议？\n\n答：我知道他们可能有某种此类安排，但我不能确定。\n\n问：一名叫 Aaron 的律师是否会就其提供的服务向您发送账单？\n\n答：我不记得。我确实不记得。\n\n问：您是否向名字为 Aaron 的律师支付任何账单？\n\n答：让我明确说明，我无法回答这个问题，是因为我没有银行账户、个人银行账户。我不付款。因此，任何付款情况我都不知道。\n\n问：据您所知，您目前是否因税务欺诈而受到调查？\n\n技术员：好的，连接到 One Direct 链接？请给我一点时间。是的，我看到了。我现在正在下载该文件。\n\n加文曼律师：根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，以及对律师/当事人保密特权的异议，拒绝回答该问题。根据我的理解，他就此可能进行的任何沟通均受律师/当事人保密特权保护。\n\n律师，系统正在要求我输入密码。\n\n沃尔曼律师：糟糕，抱歉。\n\n沃尔曼律师：仅仅承认存在调查——而不是他是否实施犯罪——怎么会构成自我归罪？\n\n问：好的。我们这样做吧。Kwok 先生，您是否审阅了您的律师在本案中向我提供的报税表？\n\n加文曼律师：他正在援引第五修正案，这是他有权这样做。\n\n答：是。\n\n您可以另问一个问题，如果您愿意。\n\n问：您是否知道，其中包括某些报税表？\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n加文曼律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：是。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：在过去五年内，您是否取得过《Internal Revenue Code（国内税收法典）》中所称的收入？\n\n问：您是否熟悉一家名为 Janover（贾诺弗）的会计师事务所？\n\n加文曼律师：根据律师的建议，郭先生的个人律师郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n答：我认为它或许是一家金融或会计咨询公司，但我不能确定。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答该问题？\n\n问：他们是否为您编制 New York State 和联邦所得税申报表？\n\n答：是。\n\n答：或许。\n\n问：您在 2019 财政年度的报税表中向 Internal Revenue Service（美国国税局）申报了多少收入？\n\n问：您是否已就 2020 年提交报税表？\n\n加文曼律师：根据律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n答：是。\n\n沃尔曼律师：Jeff，您向我提供了报税表。\n\n问：编制这些报税表的会计师是谁？\n\n加文曼律师：那是必备记录例外。这并不意味着他可以回答有关该事项的问题。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n问：您何时提交这些报税表？\n\n答：是。\n\n加文曼律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n问：请稍等。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n沃尔曼律师：好的。Hooper 女士（胡珀女士），我刚刚上传了一些压缩文件中的文件。\n\n问：是在 March 25 之前还是之后？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否就 2020 年向 New York State 或联邦政府缴纳了任何税款？\n\n加文曼律师：根据律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n沃尔曼律师：他是否缴纳任何税款已经由第三方，即政府所知。\n\n加文曼律师：他不会就此提供任何证词。\n\n问：郭先生，您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在编制您的报税表时，您是否向您的报税人员提供有关您收入的全部信息？\n\n加文曼律师：根据郭先生的建议，\n\n郭先生的律师表示，根据律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答该问题？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否收到过纽约州税务机关就可能的税务欺诈向您发出的任何函件？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题，并且以律师—当事人保密特权作为另一项独立的异议依据。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否收到过美国国内收入局、美国财政部或美国司法部就可能的税务欺诈向您发出的任何函件？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：再次根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题，并再次基于律师—当事人保密特权提出异议。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在过去七年中，您是否曾在向美国或纽约州提交的报税表中提供虚假信息？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在过去七年中，您是否明知而在向纽约州或国内收入局提交的报税表中提供任何虚假信息？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否提供过任何虚假信息？\n\n问：在您申请庇护过程中，向美国移民机关提供信息？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否熟悉一家名为 Baker Hostetler 的律师事务所？\n\n答：我不记得这个名字。我对英文名字感到非常困惑。\n\n问：您是否知悉一宗诉讼——撤回该问题。\n\n您之前提到过 Pacific Alliance（太平洋联盟）诉讼，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您知道您的律师是谁，或者该案的律师事务所是哪一家吗？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否收到过该案中代表您提供服务的账单？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：该案中代表您的任何人所开账单是否已获支付？\n\n答：当然应当支付。\n\n问：谁在支付这些账单？\n\n答：Golden Spring（金泉）。\n\n问：Baker & Hostetler 或者无论是哪一家在该案中代表您的律师事务所，是否与 Golden Spring 签有收费协议？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：本案中任何代表您的律师是否与 Golden Spring 签有收费协议？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：为什么 Golden Spring 为您在 Pacific Alliance 诉讼中的代理支付账单？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否熟悉名为 Chris Rose（克里斯·罗斯）或 Silvestri（西尔维斯特里）的律师？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否记得在 Gavenman 律师之前于内华达州代理您的律师的姓名？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n口译员：律师，您刚才说了什么吗？\n\n案号 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g86.4，第 14 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）庭审笔录\n13（49 至 52）\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我说的是对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不记得该律师的名字。\n\n问：您是否与内华达州诉讼中、在 Gavenman 律师之前的那家律师事务所签有收费协议？\n\n答：您刚才说的是哪个名字？\n\n问：无论是哪一家律师事务所。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：在内华达州针对 Cheng 先生的诉讼中，代理您的律师事务所的账单由谁支付？\n\n答：Golden Spring。\n\n问：为什么 Golden Spring 支付那些账单？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York Limited（金泉纽约有限公司）的收入是多少？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York Limited 如何产生收入？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York Limited 有哪些资产？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据郭先生律师的建议，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：Jeff——Jeff，这是关于 Golden Spring 资产的问题；据我了解，该公司并非当事人，而且并非您的委托人？这里怎么会涉及第五修正案问题？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：这里存在第五修正案问题，因此他拒绝回答。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：怎么会？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：Jay，我不能为您回答那个问题。这就是答复；他正在援引其第五修正案权利。他不应作答。\n\n问：Kwok 先生，您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York Limited 是否有任何银行账户？\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 从哪里获得资金来支付您的账单？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Golden Spring 代您付款时，您如何让 Golden Spring 知道需要付款？\n\n答：这一切均由 Golden Spring 安排。\n\n问：Golden Spring 的哪一位人员安排？\n\n答：顾问、律师。\n\n问：让我换一种方式问。Gavenman 律师是否向您寄送账单？\n\n答：我从未收到律师寄给我的账单。\n\n问：他把账单寄到哪里？\n\n答：寄给 Golden Spring 的律师。\n\n问：那么，Gavenman 律师的收费协议——撤回该问题。\n\n那么，Gavenman 律师的账单会直接寄给 Podhaskie 先生吗？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您如何得知 Golden Spring 正在支付 Gavenman 律师的费用？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Golden Spring 在决定起诉 Cheng 先生一事上是否起过任何作用？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我提醒您，不要在该回答中披露任何律师—当事人之间的沟通内容。您如能回答，可以回答。\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：内华达州已对您作出判决书。您是如何收到该判决书的？\n\n答：我没有收到。\n\n问：您是否曾看过内华达州法院针对您的判决书副本？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否曾在 Sherry-Netherland（谢里-尼德兰酒店）收到 Randazza Legal Group（兰达扎法律集团）寄给您的任何邮件？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否在 Sherry-Netherland 收取邮件？\n\n答：是，我们可以收取邮件——嗯，我希望律师您理解这一点。您看，邮件可以被收取。但问题是我确实不能阅读英文，因此我不会阅读任何英文内容。我无法阅读任何英文内容。\n\n因此，邮件可以被收取，但我本人不会阅读它们。因此，如今我本人并未收到它们。\n\n问：谁收到了？\n\n答：Golden Spring。\n\n问：邮件如何从寄往您的 Sherry-Netherland Hotel（谢里-尼德兰酒店）的邮件，转交到 Golden Spring 手中？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：那么您如何知道 Golden Spring 正在收到您的邮件？\n\n答：这是因为，在收到邮件后，Golden Spring 的律师 Daniel（丹尼尔）会与我交谈，并告诉我他们收到了什么。然后他们需要找翻译人员翻译那些信件，这样我就会知道那些信件的内容。\n\n嗯，您知道，目前有六十多宗诉讼正在进行，他们之所以参与其中，是因为中国共产党对我的威胁，中国共产党对我的威胁，以及他们对我实施了各种限制性战争，对我进行威胁。\n\n而且，您知道，他们有时会给我寄送物品或信件，其中可能含有毒素，或寄送威胁我死亡的信件，以及任何威胁到我人身安全的内容。\n\n因此，收到的物品必须经过一些安保团队和安保人员的检查，以确认其是否含有毒性物质、是否属于威胁信件、是否应向警方报告，或者是否应由法律人员处理。\n\n然后，如果其中有我需要知晓的内容，他们就必须经过翻译和各种程序。因此，事情相当复杂。\n\n而且，您知道，有时会有数千页的文件从世界上我甚至不知道的地方寄给我，那些文件中会有大量类似威胁性的语言，有时可能包含暗示和影射等内容。\n\n有时，他们会有漂亮女孩在楼下大厅，声称有文件要交给我；有时，还会有像民主党代表之类的人，想上楼，并作出某种威胁。\n\n因此，如今在 Sherry-Netherland，他们知道已发布的安全威胁，所以他们在处理各种文件和文件来源时都非常谨慎，并且他们与 Golden Spring 法律团队之间会作出特别安排。\n\n而且，无论如何，确实是因为这件事——这就像是一个战争国家正以我个人为目标。\n\n问：为明确起见，在您查看任何一封邮件之前，Golden Spring 的某人会先阅读该邮件，对吗？\n\n答：不一定。\n\n问：那么，如何确定某一封邮件需要翻译给您？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 的所有关联人员——撤回该问题。\n\nGolden Spring New York 的所有雇员都是律师吗？\n\n答：不是。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 是一家律师事务所吗？\n\n答：不是。\n\n问：因此，例如，任何时候 Gavenman 律师向您寄送信件或账单，Golden Spring 都会在您之前收到，对吗？\n\n答：我不能确定。\n\n问：您会如何得知？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n口译员：律师，您刚才说了什么吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我刚才只是说对问题形式提出异议。但他可以回答。\n\n答：因为有时 Golden Spring 的人员会联系我，或者有时律师会联系我。\n\n问：Golden Spring 中会联系您的非律师人员是谁？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我记不起来。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 是否以任何方式由中国共产党资助？\n\n答：当然不是。\n\n案号 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZ3IK PFiled Q3/119/2254 Enteried 03/113722113:56:16，第 16 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）庭审笔录\n15（57 至 60）\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n问：中国人民共和国的任何人？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：既然您此前作证称您不知道其收入来源，您怎么能够肯定地回答中国共产党并未资助它？\n\n答：嗯，您看，根据我所知，Golden Spring 已被列入共产党制定的高风险实体名单，而且——\n\n我本想稍作休息，但在此之前我还有几个问题。\n\n答：G-E-T——T-E-E-R，是的。\n\n问：您刚才手里拿着的是什么设备？\n\n答：我的手机。\n\n问：是什么类型的手机？\n\n答：Apple。\n\n问：您何时——您是什么时候——\n\n问：据我所知，Golden Spring（金泉公司）有时会因在该银行拥有银行账户而被银行拒绝购买？\n\n答：一周前。\n\n问：是谁购买的？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：据我所知，我本人和 Golden Spring 也被 Chinese Communist Party（中国共产党）列为头号国家敌人。Golden Spring 的许多员工在中国失踪并被逮捕，网上流传着许多此类视频，而这确实是每个人都应具备的基本常识。\n\n问：您能否说出您所称被逮捕或失踪的 Golden Spring 员工的姓名？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：目前，我实际上不记得他们的姓名，但网上流传着许多此类视频和信息。您可以搜索一下。\n\n问：您此前证称，您今天早上制作并上传了一段视频。您将其上传到什么系统？\n\n答：GTV Geteer（GTV 吉特尔）。\n\n书记员：您能拼写一下吗？\n\n证人：我不知道如何拼写。我只能告诉您中文名称是 GTV Geteer。\n\n书记员：Geteer，只是确认一下。\n\n口译员：我不知道。我实际上——\n\n答：稍等。让我查一下，您是要我查出名称吗？\n\n问：当然。\n\n答：因为我这里没有任何东西，我真的只需要——便笺纸，什么都没有，所以我只需要去查一下。G-E-T-E-R。\n\n问：那么名称是 GTV Geteer，G-E-T-E-E-R？\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：它是如何到您手中的？\n\n答：在办公室里。\n\n问：某个不知名的人把它留给您放在办公室里，您是这个意思吗？\n\n答：嗯，我不知道实际上是谁拿到它的。发生的事情是，我告诉律师，我说我的手机又被黑了，因为您看，我的手机总是被黑，几乎每周都被黑。\n\n答：所以我说我的手机被黑了，因此我需要一部新手机。\n\n问：谁支付了这部手机的费用？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：它有蜂窝数据套餐吗？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：该蜂窝数据套餐登记在谁名下？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您现在能在摄像头前展示主屏幕吗？\n\n答：（证人照做）\n\n问：把它转过来。\n\n问：您能解锁它，让我们看到数据运营商吗？您能把它举到摄像头前吗？近一点。请您能把它放到距摄像头几英寸的地方吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：他的主屏幕上的内容可能有什么关联性？我确实对此提出异议。我们为什么要看他的个人主屏幕和手机？没有理由要求他在电话上展示其个人主屏幕。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：我想看看运营商是谁。\n\n案号 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KP，Filed@3/119/02/113722113:56:16.7，第 17 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n16（61 至 64）\n\n61 63\n\n问：好的，我看不清。在左上角，有什么字母？\n\n答：没有字母。\n\n问：上面写的是“AT&T（美国电话电报公司）”还是“Verizon（威瑞森）”还是——\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：——T-Mobile（德国电信移动通信）？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我将要求您对主屏幕进行屏幕截图。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：不，不，我们不会这么做。我们不会这么做。拜托。\n\n这太荒谬了。他不需要对其个人手机屏幕进行屏幕截图。这就是——我们不会这么做。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：Jeff，他把它带来参加证言录取。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：是你让他为证言录取拿来的。他除了向你说出一个应用程序的名称或诸如此类的事情外，并没有查看它。\n\n他不会进行屏幕截图并发送给你。这不会发生。\n\n问：有人可以用什么电话号码拨打该手机联系您？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：这是我将提出异议的另一件事。他不必回答。\n\n没有理由要求他在本记录中提供其个人手机号码。没有任何可能的理由。这是在骚扰。没有理由这样做。让我们转向相关问题。\n\n这已经是长达两小时十五分钟的马拉松式询问，而你们还没有问到相关问题。\n\n问：请回答问题。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：您不必回答您当前的个人手机号码是什么。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：如你所称，我有权查明是谁支付他的个人手机账单。\n\n口译员：律师，您希望我翻译什么问题？\n\n问：该手机的电话号码是多少？\n\n问：您是否用那部手机给任何人发短信？\n\n答：不，我不知道。\n\n问：您是否用那部手机给任何人打电话？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：有人用那部手机给您打电话吗？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：在不披露任何谈话内容的情况下，您是否通过该手机与 Gavenman 先生交谈过？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在今天之前，您是否曾与 Gavenman 先生交谈过？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否去过 Baltimore（巴尔的摩）与 Gavenman 先生会面？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Gavenman 先生是否到 New York（纽约）与您会面？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您如何与 Gavenman 先生沟通？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否为本次证言录取做过准备——\n\n62 64\n\n问：撤回该问题。\n\nGavenman 先生是否协助您为本次证言录取做准备？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在不披露该准备工作的任何内容的情况下，您是否当面会面过？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您通过何种方式与 Gavenman 先生沟通？\n\n答：我不知道那是什么形式。\n\n问：您是否与他通过电话？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否与他们举行过像这样的视讯会议？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您如何获得链接？\n\n答：由律师安排。\n\n问：该链接如何传送给您？\n\n答：我进入房间后，连接就已经建立。\n\n问：您如何知道用于连接的 URL？\n\n答：我不知道 URL。都是由律师和 Golden Spring 连接好的。\n\n案号 22:5007:20 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n17（65 至 68）\n\n问：就今天的证言录取而言，您如何在今天用于播出的设备上取得 URL？\n\n答：这是 Golden Spring 的律师安排的。\n\n问：今天早上大约 10 a.m.，Golden Spring 的律师是否确实在那个房间里？\n\n答：嗯，当我走进房间时，房间已经空了，一切都已经连接好了。已经准备好了。我没有——我没有看到任何人。\n\n问：实际上是谁点击链接进行连接的？\n\n答：我点击了链接，然后就进入了。\n\n问：您点击的链接如何出现在该设备上？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您的手机是否关联了电子邮件账户？\n\n答：我没有电子邮件。\n\n问：您以前是否有过电子邮件账户？\n\n答：自从上学以来，我从未使用过电子邮件。尽管 Chinese Communist Party（中国共产党）捏造信息称我有很多电子邮件地址，但实际上我一个也没有。我从未使用过电子邮件。\n\n问：那么，您的意思是，与您今天早上使用的视频上传服务关联的电子邮件账户并不存在？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：我们为什么不休息一下。\n\n答：（休庭；12:22 p.m. 至 12:45 p.m.）\n\n问：Kwok 先生，您此前证称，您的一切——我想您的庇护申请都是准确的，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否记得填写过 I589 表格？\n\n答：不，我不记得。\n\n问：您是否记得庇护申请中的一个问题写道：“您或申请中包括的任何家庭成员是否曾在 United States（美国）犯过任何罪行和／或因任何罪行被逮捕、指控、定罪或判刑，包括违反移民法？”\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：那么让我问您，您是否曾——撤回该问题。\n\n问：就您的庇护申请而言，您是否陈述您或您的任何家庭成员在美国犯过任何罪行？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您何时申请庇护？\n\n答：September 2017。\n\n问：在 September 2017 之前，您是否曾在与向 Federal government（联邦政府）或 New York State（纽约州）提交税务申报表有关的事项中，明知而提交任何虚假信息？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：根据 Guo 先生律师的建议，Guo 先生援引 U.S. Constitution（美国宪法）第五修正案项下的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：就您的庇护申请而言，您是否援引了 U.S. Constitution 第五修正案项下的权利？\n\n答：我不理解您的问题。\n\n问：关于您的庇护申请，您是否如同现在这样主张第五修正案的保护？\n\n答：我仍然不理解该问题。\n\n问：您是否在庇护申请中以回答会使您因犯罪而自证其罪为由，拒绝回答任何问题？\n\n答：我仍然不理解该问题。\n\n问：您是否在庇护申请中拒绝回答任何问题？\n\n答：我仍然不理解该问题。\n\n问：您是否申请了庇护？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：是否有问题？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否回答了所有这些问题？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否拒绝在回答这些问题时提供任何信息？\n\n答：我不理解。\n\n问：您是否提供了庇护申请中要求的全部信息？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：我要提醒您，不要披露任何可能影响您对该申请要求内容或您所提供内容之理解的律师—当事人沟通。\n\n案号 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KP，Filed@3/119/02/129122113:56:18 9，第 19 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n18（69 至 72）\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n答：是。是，我回答了“是”。\n\n问：您是否知道，您有某项义务更新与您的庇护申请有关而提供的信息？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：异议，异议。他获得任何此类理解的唯一方式是通过律师—当事人沟通。他无法在不涉及律师—当事人沟通的情况下回答。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：我完全不同意这种评估。\n\n问：您是否根据律师的建议拒绝回答该问题？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否曾就您的庇护申请向 U.S. Government（美国政府）提供更新后的信息？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：还有这个——我要提醒您，不要披露任何律师—当事人沟通。\n\n在您能够回答的范围内，您可以回答，但请不要披露律师—当事人沟通。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：Jeff，我在问他提供了什么。不要教导你的证人。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：这不是教导我的证人。你问的是是否曾有补充。你不知道那是否是代表他所作，也不知道他做了什么。\n\n我说不要披露任何——\n\n70 72\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：异议。这根本没有解决问题。他能够对其被要求提供什么产生任何知识或理解的唯一方式——\n\nWOLMAN 先生：那是错误的，那是错误的。他知道的是他所知道的。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：他怎么会知道，Jay？他怎么会理解美国法律要求什么？拜托。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：他怎么会知道。所以你是在说移民没有义务了解法律？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：他会从律师那里理解法律要求什么。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：我们甚至还没有确定他使用过律师。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：你知道他由律师代理。\n\n律师，让我们问一个更根本的问题，你到底在说他的移民申请、他的庇护申请中的什么？\n\nWOLMAN 先生：Mark，安静。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：Mark，你想要在 New York（纽约）出庭——\n\nRANDAZZA 先生：不。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：并且从事一些超出你执业管辖范围的业务，那就去吧。\n\n这份庇护申请与本程序毫无关联。我\n\n律师—委托人之间的沟通，而且我不知道你为什么要问这个问题，\n\n仅此而已。这就是指示。我快要指示证人\n\n这并非任何阻挠行为。这只是告知证人不要再回答有关此事的任何问题。\n\n不得披露任何律师—委托人之间的事项——\n\n这完全超出了本次证言录取的范围，你已经就此提出问题数分钟了。你知道——\n\n只需回答问题。\n\n我不记得。\n\n问：您是否向美国移民主管机关隐瞒了任何您被要求提供的信息？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：停止诱导。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：这不是诱导，这是基于特权提出的异议。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：异议。他能理解自己被要求提供什么信息的唯一方式，是通过律师。\n\n这不是诱导。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我会重新表述。\n\n问：Guo 先生，请回答问题。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：你知道他在该程序中由律师代理。你知道他正在从律师处获得关于相关要求的建议。你正在开始——\n\n问：Guo 先生，您是否明知而隐瞒了任何您被要求向移民主管机关提供的信息——\n\n案卷 22e500130-Dood50231KP，提交日期 3/119/02/113722113756g80，第 20 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证言笔录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n19（73 至 76）\n\n律师—委托人之间的沟通，就像你不应当这样做时随意为之一样。\n\nWOLMAN 律师讯问：\n\n问：Guo 先生，请回答问题。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：不要回答该问题。存在律师—委托人异议。未经律师—委托人之间的沟通，他不能回答该问题。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：那是虚假的。\n\nWOLMAN 律师讯问：\n\n问：回答这个问题？\n\n口译员：律师，我不知道我是否已经翻译了那个问题。您介意重复一下那个问题吗？\n\n问：您是否明知而隐瞒了任何您被要求向美国移民主管机关提供的信息？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：同样的异议。\n\n答：实际上，我不理解这个问题。\n\n问：您是否已告知美国移民主管机关，您是否曾实施税务欺诈？\n\n答：没有。但我从未实施过任何税务欺诈。因此我为什么需要告诉他们这一点？\n\n问：如果您没有实施税务欺诈，您向美国政府及纽约州提交的所有所得税申报表是否准确？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：Guo 先生刚刚告诉我们，他从未实施过税务欺诈。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：明白。他不会再就此作证。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：他刚刚已经作证了。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：他不会再就此作证。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：这不是可以零碎处理的事情。你要么接受第五修正案的保护，要么不接受。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我们当然援引第五修正案的保护。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：你不能随心所欲地这样做，有时你将就你实施或未实施的犯罪作证，然后又说，不，第五修正案？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：删除该回答，他正在援引第五修正案。我们并未涉及他的任何收入、税款或诸如此类的任何事项。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我不同意删除任何内容。谢谢。\n\n问：Kwok 先生，您是否拒绝回答该问题？\n\n答：我不。我没有。非常简单的回答。我不。\n\n问：您是否拥有任何资产？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否拥有您身上所穿的衣服？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据其律师建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：我看到您正在用茶杯喝东西。杯中饮品由谁支付？\n\n答：Golden Spring（黄金泉）。\n\n问：Golden Spring 是否为您购买食品杂货？\n\n答：有时，是的。\n\n问：Golden Spring 为什么为您支付食品杂货费用？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据 Guo 先生律师的建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：谁为您的衣服付款？\n\n答：Golden Spring。\n\n问：Golden Spring 为什么为您的衣服付款？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师建议，Guo 先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n案卷 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KP，提交日期 03/10/02/254，录入日期 003/113:56:16:1，第 21 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证言笔录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n20（77 至 80）\n\n问：您是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：提醒我一下，您现在是在 Sherry-Netherland residence（Sherry-Netherland 住所）吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：有人与您同住吗？\n\n答：有时我的家人会在这里。\n\n问：您已婚吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您的妻子住在哪里？\n\n答：她住在她自己的住所。\n\n问：在哪里？\n\n答：我不能告诉你她的信息。这是关于她的事。\n\n问：为什么不能？\n\n答：嗯，这是因为你问的问题正是 CCP（中国共产党）想问的问题，而你代理 Cheng Shuiyan（程水燕）的案件，这是因为你是代表 CCP 的流氓律师，而且你问的所有问题都与案件无关，却威胁到我妻子的生命——她的安全，而这正是 CCP 想知道的信息。因此我不能告诉你。\n\n嗯，这是因为你也看到，过去一直以来，CCP，我是 CCP 的头号敌人，而一直以来发生了如此多的案件，例如司法部、Higginbotham（希金博瑟姆）被贿赂，以及 Elliott Broidy（埃利奥特·布罗伊迪）被贿赂，他们还试图绑架我、逮捕我或伤害我，然后试图查明关于我和我妻子的所有信息。\n\n事实上，你问我的问题正是 CCP 一直想在网上知道，并让人试图找出这些信息的问题。\n\n所以——而且你没有谈论任何涉及 Cheng Shuiyan 的案件。一直以来你只是在帮助 CCP，查明我的信息，并试图伤害我、试图损害我。\n\n因此，为了安全起见，这是我为保护我的家人所能做的最低限度，我不会回答你的问题。事实上，你甚至不是一个流氓辩护人、律师——\n\n问：谢谢，停止。请停止，请停止。你正在暂停。\n\n答：（英语）我不停止。我不停止。\n\n答：（英语）我不停，那是我的权力。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我们现在就联系法院。\n\n联系信息是——本次证言录取现暂停。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：Miles（迈尔斯），你可以关闭静音，关闭摄像头。我很快会加入法院电话会议。\n\n（律师同意不作记录。）\n\n（休庭；1:09 p.m. 至 1:39 p.m.）\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我们刚刚与法官举行了会议，会上表示将就今天在此援引第五修正案特权一事提交材料。如果法官认定该援引范围过宽，我将被允许在另一个续期的证言录取日期，就资产问题提出问题。\n\n因此，我们现在要做的是越过部分与资产有关的询问，回到其他一些问题。\n\n口译员：律师，请先让我翻译那一部分。\n\n问：您表示您的妻子不与您同住。您有孩子吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。您可以回答。\n\n答：一个儿子和一个女儿。\n\n问：他们叫什么名字？\n\n答：Guo Quiang（郭强）、Guo Mei（郭梅）。\n\n（记录员澄清）\n\n问：您的任何一个孩子与您同住吗？\n\n答：不。\n\n问：他们超过 18 岁了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否曾与 Cheng 先生，或与您的任何一个孩子，讨论您在 Nevada（内华达州）的诉讼或本案诉讼？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：除您的律师外，您是否曾与其他任何人讨论本案或其所依据的 Nevada 案件？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：现在是否有人与您一起在 Sherry-Netherland residence（Sherry-Netherland 住所）？\n\n答：酒店保安，还有大楼的清洁人员、清洁团队。\n\n问：我假定您没有与他们中的任何人讨论本案，对吗？\n\n答：是。没错。\n\n问：我为这个问题道歉，但您是否有可能与其讨论过本案的女朋友或男朋友？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：好的。现在，您是否还——据我了解，您今年夏天也住在一艘船上？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：有人与您一起住在船上吗？\n\n答：是，有很多人。大约有八、九名船员。\n\n问：只有船员住在船上吗？\n\n答：嗯，有客人，有船主的客人。所以有时他们——他们也在那里。我不知道。\n\n（音频问题；记录员澄清）\n\n口译员：好的，我完成了。\n\n问：这些客人是谁？\n\n答：嗯，我不是船主。因此我不能——我无法回答那个问题。\n\n问：Steve Bannon（史蒂夫·班农）去年夏天住在船上吗？\n\n答：有一段时间。\n\n问：所以您记得一个人。您现在还记得谁？\n\n答：其他人。\n\n问：这些其他人是谁？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：为什么您现在能够记得 Bannon 先生而不能记得其他人？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否与 Bannon 先生讨论过您与 Cheng 先生的诉讼？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：如果我们询问 Bannon 先生，他是否会掌握任何关于您与 Cheng 先生之间诉讼的信息？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您与 Bannon 先生是什么关系？\n\n答：嗯，我们有消灭中国共产党的共同目标，并向西方讲述真相，因此我们——我们是战略伙伴。\n\n问：你们如何成为战略伙伴？\n\n答：嗯，我们是致力于消灭中国共产党并向西方讲述真相的伙伴。\n\n问：抱歉，您与 Bannon 先生是否存在正式的商业关系？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否仍与 Bannon 先生保持联系？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：这些事情究竟有什么相关性——\n\n答：是。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：这与本案的任何相关事项都相去甚远。我已经让很多问题进行下去，但你不可能告诉我，除某种骚扰目的外，提这些问题还有任何理由。\n\n如果你有其他目的，我们可以讨论，但这些问题不可能与本案相关。\n\n问：您是否仍与 Bannon 先生保持联系？\n\n答：是，我们仍有联系，是的。\n\n问：您如何保持联系？\n\n答：电话。\n\n问：是您打给他，还是他打给您？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：除非你同意说明——我们可以不作记录——这些事情究竟如何可能相关？你只是在骚扰证人。如果有任何理由说明这为何相关，我很乐意私下讨论，好吗，我们可以继续。\n\n但你只是在因完全无关的事情骚扰他。你在大部分证言录取期间都在这样做。他如何打电话或不打电话给 Steve Bannon，与本案有什么关系？拜托。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：实际上，你可能不记得，但你的当事人作证说他不接电话。所以现在他刚刚接了。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：他没有作证说他不接电话。他没有。\n\n25 让公众了解该病毒的真相。并证明他不接听电话。\n\n案号 22:500730-000310291K PFiled 03/110/02/254Enteried:001129/22113:56:1863 df age 23 of\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n22（85至88）\n\n87\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我正在探究先前的证词。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：那不是他所说的。那不是他所说的，而且我们正在谈论 Steve Bannon（史蒂夫·班农）、他与 Steve Bannon 的关系。你试图查明他是否接听电话？这就是重点？这就是你正在做的？你可以问那个问题。\n\n但是，他与 Steve Bannon 的关系及其合伙关系，诸如此类——这才是你一直在问的，而不是电话问题；你尚未说明这为何具有相关性。因此，如果你想问一个关于电话的问题，尽管问。但不要歪曲证词。你可以问那个问题。关于 Steve Bannon 已经够了。这毫无任何可能的相关性。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：我以为你说过我们不作口头异议。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我说过我愿意暂停记录。如我所说，在你继续不暂停记录后，我对你所说的话作出了回应。我欢迎暂停记录。\n\n证人：等等。我们——等一下。我实际上可以向我的律师 Jeff 提一个建议吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：可以。\n\n证人：实际上，我想告诉你，我感到非常不舒服、很不安，因为我觉得他们向我提出的问题与 Cheng Shuiyan（程水燕）一案无关，而且他们问我的问题确实涉及我的朋友、我的家人，这正是中国共产党的提问路线。\n\n所以我感到不安和不舒服，因为我觉得这已经对我自身安全以及我朋友和家人的安全构成威胁。是否可以实际给法官打电话，告诉其我对此非常不安？\n\n因此，这对我而言是一种滥用，而且也是一种对与本案无关的第三方的威胁，例如我的孩子、我的儿子、我的女儿、我的家人和我的朋友。\n\n你看，很多这类证词信息随后将被发布到网上，并对他们的安全构成巨大威胁；事实上，Cheng Shuiyan 本人已经做了很多这种事。\n\n因此，如果此后其中任何信息将被发布到网上，例如关于我的衣着、我的生活方式，以及我的家人、我的朋友，这确实是对与本案无关的第三方安全的一种严重威胁。\n\n我强烈要求给法官打电话，让他或她知道，这对我和我的朋友构成威胁。\n\n还有，你看到，围绕我的衣着、我的生活方式、我的妻子、我的儿子、我的女儿和 Bannon 先生的问题，确实就是我生活的范围，这是我整个人生的地图。就我的安全而言，如果你上网查看，这正是中国共产党一贯试图描述、刻画和收集的信息线索。\n\n所以，这一系列问题对我而言，严重地将我置于极大危险和巨大威胁之中。这就是为什么我觉得这种问题、这一路问题实际上带有恶意；我希望让法官知悉此事，也希望我的律师能帮助我联系法官并告知他们。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我同意。我认为我们已经越过了界限，构成骚扰。任何关于 Bannon 的问题、谁住在船上的问题，确实都没有相关性。\n\n你向法官表示过，我们将转向 Nevada litigation（内华达州诉讼）。如果你不这样做，如果你继续这一系列提问，我将去找法官。\n\n案号 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:16:4 dPage 24 of\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n23（89至92）\n\n我不记得了。\n\n问：你曾在美国受雇工作过吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师建议，Guo 先生援引 U.S. Constitution（美国宪法）Fifth Amendment（第五修正案）规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：你拒绝回答吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你说过你见过 Cheng 先生一次。那是什么时候？\n\n答：大约是在 October 2017。\n\n问：那次会面的情形是什么？\n\n答：当时，事实上，还有许多人在场，包括他当时的私人雇员 Lude Wang Ding Gang，以及另外名为 Yang Jian Li 和 Han Lian Chao 的人。\n\n我们都在 Washington DC 的 K Hamlet Hotel 会面；他想要——想让我签字并支持他的反中国共产党运动。他告诉我，他尊重我的努力，并表示鼓励我的反中共活动，并且——然后他还要求我在许多报纸上签字。\n\n问：那次会面之后，你们此后是否有任何直接沟通？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：你是否记得制作过一段关于 Cheng 先生的视频？\n\n答：我在 5th of June 2018 制作了一段视频。\n\n问：你为什么制作那段视频？\n\n答：在 2018 年 March 和 April，Cheng Shuiyan 的雇员 Wang Ding Gang 与 Cheng Shuiyan 一起创建了一家名为 Voice of Freedom 的媒体。随后，他们在 YouTube 上制作了许多支持我的视频，也制作了关于中国共产党的腐败问题的视频。\n\n然而，到 March 至 April 末，Wang Ding Gang 告诉我，有一名具有政府背景的人从 Bejing 来访 Cheng Shuiyan，并赠送他诸如昂贵 Moutai 等昂贵礼物，然后告诉他不要支持我。因此，不要在 Voice of Freedom 平台上支持我。\n\n这完全无关。你知道这一点。你告诉法官我们会转向 Nevada litigation，请转向那个问题。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：请记录员宣读我最后一个问题。\n\n（宣读记录）\n\nWOLMAN 律师：谢谢。\n\n问：Kwok 先生，你给 Bannon 先生打电话，还是他给你打电话？\n\n答：我不记得了。\n\n问：你使用什么设备进行这些电话通话？\n\n答：我不记得了。\n\n问：你是否用你先前向我们展示的那部电话给他打电话？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：你的最高学历是什么？\n\n答：初中。\n\n问：你最后一次工作是什么时候？\n\n答：我不记得了。\n\n问：你最后一份有薪工作是什么？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据 Guo 先生律师的建议，Guo 先生援引 U.S. Constitution（美国宪法）Fifth Amendment（第五修正案）规定的权利，拒绝回答该问题。而且，Wolman 先生，我们已经确定，不会再继续询问收入问题。因此，这——\n\nWOLMAN 律师：让我问这一个，让我问这一个。\n\n问：你最后一份不会援引第五修正案特权的工作是什么？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我需要提出异议——在你能够基于非律师—当事人沟通作答的范围内，你可以回答。\n\n在回答会披露律师—当事人沟通的范围内，包括你对第五修正案特权的理解，请不要回答会披露任何律师—当事人沟通的内容。\n\n答：我实际上不记得了。\n\n问：你任职时间最长的工作是什么？\n\n案号 22-50073\nDoc 102-1\nFiled 03/19/22\nEntered 03/19/22 13:56:36\n第25页，共\n\n案号 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g86.6 dPage 26 of\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n25（97至100）\n\n97\n\n事实上，他的 Hong Kong 合伙人也曾联系我，并向我提供此类文件；随后，我此前存储在电脑和手机中的所有这些文件和信息均遭到黑客入侵并被全部毁坏。否则，我会在手机和电脑中保留它们。\n\n事实上，其中包括某些银行文件，以及他在中国大陆的犯罪记录——文件和记录；他的律师向我提供了这些，我曾拥有全部这些文件。\n\n问：这位律师叫什么名字？\n\n答：我现在不记得了。\n\n问：这位 Hong Kong 商业合伙人叫什么名字？\n\n答：我现在也不记得了。\n\n问：这次所谓的黑客入侵发生在何时？\n\n答：在 Cheng Shuiyan 和他的雇员、私人雇员 Marco 在 Geteer 平台上攻击我之后，自那以后，我的手机每天都遭到黑客入侵。事实上，确实是每天。\n\n事实上，从 May 2018 到 August 2018，Cheng Shuiyan 和他的私人雇员 Marco 对我进行——攻击我；由于那次攻击，我更换手机后，手机每天或每隔两天就遭到黑客入侵。因此，基本上在那个时候，我几乎每天都需要更换手机。\n\n那将是被黑客入侵、存有 Cheng Shuiyan 文件的手机。\n\n而且当时我也有一个 Twitter 账户；事情发生时，我发推文并发送信息，说明我的手机被黑客入侵，文件被黑客入侵。因此，我通过 Twitter 信息和视频发送了该信息。\n\n问：你何时丢弃这些手机？\n\n答：大约在 August 或 September 2018。我不是说我在一天内处置了所有手机。有时在这里，有时在那里。有时——等一下。\n\n所以，有时是这一天，有时是后来，有时是更早，因为那些手机一旦遭到黑客入侵——有时只是遭到黑客入侵，但有时整部手机都着火了。\n\n把所有这些手机留在这里确实会构成威胁，因此我才将其处置。\n\n问：我有点困惑，因为 HBO 片段不是在 November 15, 2017 播出的吗，这比 May 2018 的视频早几个月——抱歉，是 June 2018？\n\n答：那么——也许存在某种错误，而且我没有说 HBO 采访中展示的那些手机遭到黑客入侵。\n\n当天。\n\n问：这些文件就在这部手机和那台电脑上，是吗？\n\n答：是，就在那部手机上。\n\n问：那部手机现在在哪里？\n\n答：全都扔掉了。因为我再也打不开它们，也不能再使用它们了。\n\n问：那台电脑现在在哪里？\n\n答：我没有使用电脑。我实际上只是使用手机。我说的只是手机。\n\n问：这些文件是如何进入您手机的？\n\n答：当时是通过 WhatsApp（即时通讯应用程序）和 MSN Messenger（微软即时通讯服务）。\n\n事实上，HBO（美国有线电视台）曾对我进行采访，而在那次采访期间——您可以查看那些视频——在那次采访中，我把这些文件展示在 Geteer（盖特）平台的网络上。因此，如果您进行搜索，就能找到这些文件。\n\n我只是说，在那次采访期间，我展示了我所拥有的手机——有很多手机遭到入侵。所以我只是说，当时我的手机已经被入侵，但黑客活动的高峰发生在 2018 年 5 月至 8 月之间。\n\n问：好的。您是说，您可能在 2018 年 8 月或 9 月的某个时候处置了那部载有与 Cheng Shuiyan（程水燕）先生有关文件的手机，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您最初是在何时决定起诉程先生的？\n\n答：我确实无法准确回忆是在 6 月、7 月还是 8 月，您知道，在那段期间，他对我本人及我的家人发动了严重攻击，充满恶意，包括他本人、他的雇员 Marco（马可），每天不断地对我发动攻击。这给我的生活和家庭带来了如此多的伤害和破坏。\n\n所以我确实无法准确回忆我决定起诉他的时间，也许是在 5 月或 8 月，大约在那个时候。\n\n问：您何时聘请律师 Christopher Rose（克里斯托弗·罗斯）和／或 Jolley, Urga, Woodbury, Holthus & Rose（乔利、乌尔加、伍德伯里、霍尔瑟斯及罗斯律师事务所）？\n\n答：我还必须澄清，您知道，我实际上不记得律师的姓名或律师事务所的名称。您刚才提到的所有这些名字，我完全没有概念。\n\n不过，我可以去洗手间吗？\n\n问：可以。等等，删除刚才的话，我们先回答这些问题。您何时聘请提起内华达州诉讼的律师事务所？\n\n答：我无法回忆具体时间。\n\n问：好的，我们可以休息五分钟去洗手间。\n\n（休庭；下午 2:31 至下午 2:40。）\n\n问：Guo（郭文贵）先生，您是否曾试图从您声称被入侵的任何这些手机中恢复数据？\n\n答：嗯，从未成功恢复。\n\n问：是谁试图恢复数据？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否曾将这些一部或多部手机提交给专业电子取证公司进行恢复？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您的内华达州律师是否协助您尝试从该设备或这些设备中恢复任何数据？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：那么，您记得关于恢复这些手机数据所作努力的什么情况？\n\n答：我没有任何记忆。\n\n问：是谁告诉您处置这些手机的？\n\n答：我自己。\n\n问：是否有人曾告诉您不要处置手机？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您是否知道，在预期诉讼时有保存文件的义务？\n\nGAVENMAN（加文曼）先生：异议。在您能够作答且不以律师—委托人沟通为基础的范围内，您可以回答，但请不要披露律师—委托人沟通。\n\n答：我的回答是否定的。\n\n问：有什么理由说明，在您于 2018 年 8 月 9 日在内华达州针对程先生提出的起诉状中，没有提及您的视频或这些文件吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：再次提醒您，我强烈告诫您不要披露任何律师—委托人沟通。在任何理解来自律师—委托人沟通的范围内，您不应披露该问题。在您能够不作披露而回答的范围内，您可以回答。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您提到了使用 MSN Messenger。与之关联的 Microsoft（微软）账户是什么？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我有一百多部手机。我确实无法回忆其中任何一部。\n\n问：您是否知道——\n\n答：所以，当我谈到我使用的数百部手机时，那会是指 2018 年 8 月期间的情况。事实上，在 2018 年 8 月之后，我使用的手机会更多。\n\n问：您怎么可能在没有电子邮件地址的情况下拥有 MSN Messenger 账户？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：对提问形式、基础提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我只知道，当我有手机时，就有一个手机号码，因此我可以使用 MSN 这项功能。我不知道 MSN 与电子邮件有任何联系。\n\n问：您每次获得手机时，是谁为您设置手机？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您能否回忆起曾帮助您设置手机的任何人？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：您那里有一部 Apple iPhone（苹果 iPhone）吗？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：与该 iPhone 关联的 Apple ID（苹果账户）是什么？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您几天前才得到那部手机，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：它现在仍在您面前，或者和您一起在这个房间里吗？\n\n答：不，在另一个房间。\n\n问：好的。到目前为止我们休息过几次。在这些休息期间，您是否与任何人交谈过？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在我们今天的任何休息期间，您是否向任何人发送过通信？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您在提交前是否阅读过内华达州起诉状？\n\n实际上，删除刚才的问题。我要上传一份文件。\n\nWOLMAN（沃尔曼）先生：应该正在上传。\n\n技术员：请确保您点击了——\n\nWOLMAN 先生：我点击了。\n\n技术员：好的。有些人会漏掉这一点。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：不知为何，进度条没有移动。\n\n口译员：我正在向证人解释，我们正在等待文件上传。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：我刚刚上传到 Zoom（在线视频会议平台）。您能使用吗？\n\n技术员：可以，当然可以。请稍候。\n\n问：我将其标记为证物 3，并在屏幕上展示该文件。\n\n（题为“Complaint（起诉状）”的证物 3，截至本日标记供识别。）\n\n问：这是您于 2018 年 8 月 9 日在内华达州针对程先生提交的原始起诉状的电子副本。我们可以滚动查看。\n\n您在提交前是否以英文或译文阅读过该文件？\n\n答：简要译文，是的，有人曾向我简要翻译过。\n\n问：是谁翻译的？\n\n答：我无法回忆。\n\n问：翻译该文件的人是否与内华达州律师事务所有关联？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您是如何认识这名译员的？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：异议，提问形式、基础。\n\n答：嗯，我不认识这名译员。\n\n问：现在，第 13 页第 101 段写道：“Cheng does not know Guo personally.”（程不认识郭本人。）\n\n然而，您作证称，在该起诉状提交前数月，您二人已经见过面，对吗？\n\n答：您误解了，因为这里所说的“程不认识郭本人”是指，在很久以前、在我们亲自见面之前很久，在他指控我是强奸犯和杀人犯、说我与习近平有数百万美元交易并背叛 14 亿中国人民之前，我们并不认识彼此。\n\n所以我强调的是，在他恶意侮辱我、威胁我、伤害我以及在我们见面之前，他并不认识我。\n\n问：抱歉，我的当事人是在何时称您为强奸犯的？\n\n答：让我看看，他从 3 月开始让他的私人雇员 Marco，随后从 4 月、5 月和 6 月一直到 8 月，他们开始恶意、凶狠地以言语攻击我；他本人和他的私人雇员 Marco，不断在他们的平台上称我是强奸犯，我是，您知道，农民，我是骗子，我是什么人都有，并且他——他们对我作出此类威胁，威胁我的安全和我家人的安全，我们一直生活在这种威胁和恐惧之下。\n\n问：请求删除，该回答不具回应性。\n\n问：强奸犯？\n\n答：嗯，事情是，他和他的雇员 Marco，一直在——在 Freedom China（自由中国）或 Twitter（推特）上称我是骗子。但我无法准确回忆程水燕是在何时这样称呼我的，而他和他的私人雇员肯定从 5 月或——他们确实这样称呼过我。\n\n问：所以您是说——\n\n答：他确实这样做了。他确实这样做了，我——我还没有说完，对不起，律师。\n\n嗯，而且——\n\n（同时交谈。）\n\n问：首先，我不需要翻译这些内容。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：您需要把这些内容翻译出来。他将作出回答。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：他根本没有回答任何问题。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生：他当然在回答。\n\nWOLMAN 先生：他是在拖延，他是在拖延。\n\n答：我已经——我已经回答了您，所以您必须让我把这些内容翻译出来。而且——因为我已经回答了您的问题。\n\n到 3 月底，以及 6 月、5 月和 4 月，他来自 Yingnan（英南）的律师一直——一直打电话告诉我，程水燕已经指控我是间谍、强奸犯等等。\n\n还包括 Lude（路德），他私下告诉我，程水燕亲自私下称我为强奸犯和骗子，还进行威胁，而且，您知道，事实上这也在社交媒体上。\n\n随后，他实际上自然地私下——\n\n答：所以我实际上不能确定，真正因那件事起诉我的是 Ria Ma（马瑞娅）。\n\n您看，这个案件是在我于 2017 年进行爆料直播后立即提起的，随后就在同一天，国际刑警组织对我本人发出了通知，然后此案就被提起。\n\n但问题是，在整个案件中，我没有见过马瑞娅，也没有见过中国大陆警方提出的文件或信息。马瑞娅从未以任何方式出现或露面。\n\n所以我相信，这是中国共产党警方捏造并提起的案件，这就是为什么程水燕对此案如此熟悉。\n\n但马瑞娅从未出现，事实上，我们一直试图寻找她，并试图让她成为该案的证人，但她从未露面。\n\n问：该案仍在进行中，对吗？\n\n答：是。我们——我应该说，我们正在寻找马瑞娅，并且已经寻找她数月。\n\n问：为明确起见，是否有其他人指控您实施性侵？\n\n口译员：抱歉，我刚才听到两个声音。\n\n问：为明确起见，除马瑞娅外，是否有其他人指控您实施性侵？\n\n答：没有。\n\n（同时交谈。）\n\n问：至于——没有提出问题。没有提出问题。\n\n答：那就是——那就是为什么——我需要\n\n公开指控我是一名强奸犯。事实上，他还说我是强奸犯，应当被驱逐出境，而且他也就此发了推文。\n\n他在 Twitter 上声称，他已致函 DOJ（美国司法部），其个人雇员 Marco（马可）也已致函 DOJ，称我是强奸犯，应当被驱逐出境，因此中国政府可以，你知道，直接处置我；这一切既私下进行，也公开进行。\n\n问：既然看来是您自己引出了这个话题，您是否因性侵而被起诉？\n\n答：是。\n\n案卷第 30 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的证言记录\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n29（113 至 116）\n\n嗯，这就是为什么我需要告诉您，因为很多证据没有出现在该起诉状中，也没有在 Nevada（内华达州）的诉讼中提出；这正是他们在该案中犯了两项致命错误的原因，结果我们输了那场诉讼。\n\n其一是，Lude（路德）——Lude 是——那就是 Wang Ding Gang（王定刚），以及 Cheng Shuiyan（程水燕）的个人雇员 Marco，他们对我作出这些诽谤和侮辱，是因为他们受 Cheng Shuiyan 指使和告知。\n\n因此，Cheng Shuiyan 应当对其针对我的所有攻击、侮辱和诽谤性言论负责，而这些并未作为证据列入本案。\n\n这还包括大量信息，包括手机中的信息以及丢失的信息等；这些都没有被列入任何该起诉状中。这就是我们败诉的原因，也是我们聘请新律师并重新提起本案的原因。\n\n这还包括这样一个事实：我仅就其造成的损害向他主张15,000。该金额非常低。\n\n我们之所以仅主张如此低的金额，是因为这只是为了制止他，制止他继续作出恶意侮辱和恶毒谣言；这些行为对我和我的家人极具破坏性，也包括在网上散布所有这些有关我的欺骗性信息，而这些信息由他及其个人雇员 Marco 制造，并由他与 Lude 的谈话所证实。\n\n所有这些都没有被列入 Nevada 案件中提交的起诉状，这就是我们继续追究此事的原因。\n\n我们希望借此机会向法官和本案提供更多事实，以便我们能够证明 Cheng Shuiyan 与中国共产党（CCP）相互勾结并共谋，对我散布破坏性的侮辱言论，制造关于我的恶意谣言；这些行为极具破坏性。\n\n问：您是否有任何——抱歉，轮到我了。您是否有任何实际证据证明我的当事人正与 CCP 合作？\n\n答：我知道，在 March，Cheng Shuiyan 与来自中国大陆的某人会面，而那个人实际上是一名蒙古警方人员。\n\n所以，他与此人饮用茅台酒，并由此人给予数亿——数百万 dollars，只是为了让他诽谤和侮辱我。\n\n所有这些实际上均由 Lude 记录和讲述，这些都是事实，确凿如钢铁；而唯一会认为我是敌人、我是坏人的人，就是中国共产党。他们是唯一会把我视为敌人的人，或者与他们合作的人会把我视为敌人。\n\n因此，我可以告诉您，我知道 Cheng Shuiyan 非常富有，但问题是，他得到的钱来自欺诈中国的人、欺诈其在中国的商业伙伴，以及非法所得。\n\n问：而且，这些信息是您从一名叫作 Lude、正在失业的人那里得到的，对吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师（加文曼）：对形式提出异议。\n\n答：好的。所以 Lude 并没有失业。Lude 放弃了他的工作，因为他不想与 CCP 共谋。\n\n而且，在他放弃 Cheng Shuiyan 那里的工作之后，他的生活更好了。他在反中国共产党活动方面做得更好得多。\n\n此外，我必须澄清，该信息并非来自 Lude。正如我所述，该信息来自 Cheng Shuiyan——来自 Yingnan 的律师，其同时也是蒙古警方的情报警察；还来自对那些人的蒙古警方讯问，那些人在支持我之后失踪，并被那些警察逮捕。信息来源于那些人，而非 Lude。\n\n问：除 Lude 外，您今天不记得任何其他这些消息来源的姓名，对吗？\n\n答：如果您想查找那些姓名，并且，您知道，如果您有时间，那些姓名在网上，您实际上可以找到它们。\n\n问：您能找到它们吗？\n\n答：我可以尝试。\n\n案卷第 31 页\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的证言记录\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n30（117 至 120）\n\n问：您是否会指示您的律师补充初始披露？\n\n答：我不能保证，但我会尝试。\n\n问：您认为何时能向我们提供该信息？\n\n答：我不能保证。正如我所说，我不能承诺。因此，我无法告诉您何时。\n\n问：如果您愿意，您本可以将任何法律诉状翻译给您，对吗？\n\n答：您是指由谁翻译？\n\n问：您是否让经认证的译员为您翻译过任何法律诉状？\n\n答：我们的律师当时做得很好。\n\n问：既然现在才发现有信息未被列入，您怎么知道您的律师做得很好？\n\n答：所以，我——我的意思是，通常律师会做好工作。当然，那位律师，即那位特定律师，没有做好工作。但通常可以依赖律师。\n\n问：如果您愿意，您本可以将任何内容翻译，对吗？\n\n答：当然。\n\n问：Nevada 的诉讼费用由谁支付？\n\n答：Golden Spring（金泉）。\n\n问：为什么？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：请稍等。根据郭先生律师的意见，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\nWOLMAN 律师（沃尔曼）：Jeff（杰夫），那不是与资产有关的问题。那是一个动机问题。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我们援引第五修正案。我们已经讨论过这个问题。你们已经问了20个问题，问他们为什么支付这些费用。我不知道你为什么会认为这里会有不同的答案。\n\n证人：律师，我需要去关窗，因为窗户现在开着。有一阵风。所以我需要关窗。我去关窗可以吗？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：当然。\n\n问：您是否要求 Golden Spring 支付 Nevada 诉讼费用？\n\n口译员：律师，我可以再重复一遍口译吗？\n\n答：我向他们借款。\n\n问：是否有一项记录该借款的协议？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否必须偿还他们？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师意见，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您借了多少？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师意见，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：该借款安排是否约定利息？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对形式提出异议。缺乏基础。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：利率是多少？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师意见，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：如果您在 Nevada 针对 Cheng 先生的案件中胜诉，Golden Spring New York（金泉纽约）是否有权获得该项追偿的任何部分？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师意见，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：您是否曾向 Golden Spring New York 借款，为任何其他诉讼提供资金？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：根据律师意见，郭先生援引美国宪法第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：在您对先前 Nevada 律师事务所感到失望之后，您是否采取任何措施，以确保您与 Cheng 先生诉讼中的所有文件都被翻译给您？\n\n答：没有。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：Juliet（朱丽叶），我们来调出编号003的文件。\n\n口译员：律师，我可以——\n\n技术员：可以，标记为证物4。该文件已显示在屏幕上。\n\n（证物4，Complaint and Jury Demand，作为截至本日的识别标记。）\n\n问：郭先生，我声明这是本案的起诉状和陪审团审判请求书。您是否曾将该文件翻译？\n\n问：您是否将其翻译给您？\n\n答：当时我对该文件有语音同步口译，是为我作的简要口译，但我不记得是否有书面翻译。\n\n问：如果您没有将先前的文件，即证物4，完整翻译，您如何能够协助向您的公司提供意见，以决定是否承认或否认某些事实？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我提醒您，不要在此回答中披露任何律师与当事人之间的沟通内容。在不披露该等内容的范围内，您可以自由作答。\n\n答：我必须澄清。您知道，该文件——\n\n问：郭先生，我注意到这些是由您本案律师提交——送达的初始披露。您是否曾将该文件翻译？\n\n答：问题是——请允许我再次强调，这是一份英文文件；您知道，如果您问我屏幕上刚刚显示在我面前的任何英文文件，并向下滚动让我看，我确实无法确定我是否见过它，或者是否翻译过该文件。我确实无法确定。\n\n现在，如果您给我时间，把该文件放在我面前，让我真正详细阅读并尝试回忆，也许我可以。但只是将其显示在我面前并滚动，我无法确定。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：好的。我们转到006。我知道我来回跳，Juliet，抱歉。\n\n技术员：完全没问题。\n\n技术员：将其标记为证物5，证物5已显示在屏幕上。\n\n（证物5，Defendant Wengui Guo（郭文贵）’s Answer to the Complaint，作为截至本日的识别标记。）\n\n问：我声明这是由 Gavenman 律师在本案中代表郭先生提交的对起诉状的答辩。您是否将该文件翻译给您？\n\n答：是。\n\n技术员：将其标记为证物7，证物7已显示在屏幕上。\n\n（证物7，Defendant Wengui Guo（郭文贵）’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Logan Cheng（罗根·程）’s Second Revised First Set of Requests for Production of Documents，作为截至本日的识别标记。）\n\n问：这是一份24页的文件，是您对我们经第二次修订的第一套文书出示请求的答复。随着技术员滚动浏览——\n\n……它，你会看到有超过 100 项文件请求，其中许多此前向我出示过的，我实际上无法确定是否有任何译文文字。可能有，也可能没有。\n\n在这些编号的请求中，许多随后已被删除。包括这一份在内也是如此。我的意思是——我可能看过，但也可能没有看过。因此，对于这些英文文件中的任何一份，我确实无法确定。\n\n你记得是否看过其中任何一份有超过 100 项请求的文件的译本吗？\n\n答：是的，我记得。\n\n你是否为自己安排翻译了那份文件？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：好的。现在我们看编号 005。\n\n问：那么我们来看 008。\n\n技术员：好的。该文件已标记为证物 6，并正在屏幕上显示该文件。\n\n（证物 8，被告 Wengui Guo（郭文贵）对原告 Logan Cheng（程水燕）第一套质询书的异议及答复，截至本日标记供识别。）\n\n（证物 6，被告 Wengui Guo（郭文贵）的初步披露，标记供识别。）\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/113722113756g863 dPage 33 of\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n32 (125 to 128)\n\n问：这些是你对修订后第一套质询书的答复。我们把它向下滚动到最后。回到第 5 页，那是你的签名吗？\n\n答：现在——是的，这是我的签名，但我必须澄清，我的意思是，我不记得——我无法确定是否有供我使用的书面译文文件。但我的律师确实向我提供了这些文件的口头传译。\n\n问：你是否明白，你是在伪证处罚的约束下签署该文件的？\n\n答：当然。\n\n问：你是否确定你理解本文件中所载你答复的译文？\n\n答：是的。\n\n问：你签署这份文件时在哪里？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：这是上周的事，对吗？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：你看到日期了吗，March 24, 2021？\n\n答：所以应当是，你知道，March 24，对吗？\n\n问：是的。\n\n答：在那种情况下，就是 March 24。\n\n问：而你不记得你上周签署这份文件时在哪里？\n\n答：我确实不记得。\n\n问：在本次证言录取中稍早时，我曾问你是否有任何会妨碍你准确回答问题的医疗状况。你是否有某种影响记忆力的医疗状况？\n\n答：我记得这个问题。\n\n问：那么你为何无法记起你上周在哪里签署这份文件？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：你目前是否接受神经科医生的诊治？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否有任何医生告诉你，你的记忆力有问题？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生（加文曼先生）：我们已经接近骚扰的边界了。他只是记不得该文件是在何处签署的。\n\n我们不要谈医疗记录。对此曾有一项请求，我们提出了异议，并就医疗问题申请了保护令。我们可以——你已经非常接近边界了。\n\nWOLMAN 先生（沃尔曼先生）：那是在我发现你的当事人不知道他上周在哪里签署该文件之前。\n\nGAVENMAN 先生（加文曼先生）：好的，你是否有——他的照护情况究竟如何确实无关紧要。他不记得地点。这确实应当是问题的开始和结束之处。\n\n问：你是否拒绝回答该问题？\n\n口译员：律师，我认为我尚未完成对该问题的口译。你能否为我重复该问题？\n\n问：当然。是否有任何医生诊断你患有记忆方面的疾病？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：回到最后一份证物，即 00——即 Kwok 7，你为查找回应性文件做了什么？\n\n答：我们的律师进行了查找。\n\n问：你在哪里存放文件？\n\n答：我没有存放或保留任何文件。\n\n问：你是否向律师提供了你的任何手机或其他计算机设备？\n\n答：我没有电脑。\n\n问：你目前使用什么设备来串流本次证言录取？\n\n答：一部手机。\n\n问：那部手机是否不同于你先前向我们出示的那部？\n\n答：不是，我面前实际上是一台——\n\n口译员：律师，您介意我向证人澄清这个术语吗？\n\nWOLMAN 先生（沃尔曼先生）：当然。\n\n答：所以，我面前的是一台视频播放设备。\n\n问：它是什么类型的设备？\n\n答：我不明白。因为你看，它们是英文书写——它们——有英文文字，所以我确实不知道。\n\n问：它是电脑吗？\n\n答：不是，它是一台图像视频设备，或者叫作图像采集设备之类的东西。\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:164 dPage 34 of\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n33 (129 to 132)\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n问：它如何连接互联网？\n\n答：因为它是摄影成像设备，所以可以连接互联网。\n\n问：它是通过某种 wifi 形式连接的吗？\n\n答：它具有 wifi，也具有有线连接功能。\n\n问：它并不连接——它是否以任何方式连接到电脑？\n\n答：我确实不知道，因为它有一个盒子。它叫作直播盒，因为我可以在任何地方自行直播。因此，这是一台便携式设备，带有直播盒。我不知道它是否连接——能否连接到电脑。\n\n问：你在哪里存放记录？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生（加文曼先生）：对形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我没有任何可以存放记录的地方，因为与 Cheng Shuiyan（程水燕）不同，我每天都在试图逃离、躲避来自 CCP（中国共产党的）的迫害，而且我不像拥有酒店和房产的 Cheng Shuiyan 那样富有，你知道，我每天都在四处奔波。我确实没有任何可以保管这些记录的地方。\n\n问：当你说你不像——抱歉，当你说你不像我的当事人那么富有时，你是如何知道的？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生（加文曼先生）：如果该回答中有任何部分涉及你的资产或非资产，Kwok 先生，根据律师建议，你应当拒绝回答该问题，并援引美国宪法第五修正案规定的权利。如果问题涉及 Cheng 先生的资产，你可以回答。\n\n答：嗯，你看，Cheng Shuiyan 在 Las Vegas 有一家酒店，Lude 也说他有其他利润份额，而且根据那位必须访谈很多人的蒙古警察，那些人告诉我，Cheng Shuiyan 很可能在 Mongolia 也有很多房产。因此，根据这些信息，据称 Cheng Shuiyan 至少拥有 10 亿美元资产。他足够富有，能够把我送进中国监狱，并把我驱逐到中国在那里监禁。\n\n问：你如何连接到互联网？\n\n答：因为这是一台摄影成像设备，所以它可以连接互联网。\n\n问：你是否知道，在 Nevada 的诉讼中，我们是出于完全善意，只要求了一笔非常小的金额，15,000 dollars？其目的仅仅是阻止他攻击我们，阻止他散布给我和我的家人造成严重破坏的恶意、恶毒谣言。\n\n这在我家人心中造成了极大的恐惧，因为试想，他们被告知将被驱逐回 China，交到 Chinese Communist Party 手中，并被 Chinese Communist Party 关进监狱，而后 Cheng Shuiyan 及其个人雇员 Marco（马尔科）直接前往 Department of Justice（司法部），要求将我们驱逐。这就是在我们身上散布的那种恐惧和可怕指控。\n\n因此，这完全是出于恶意和恶毒意图，而我们作为回应，只是像要求 15,000 的损害赔偿，以阻止他出于恶意散布关于我们的那种谣言。\n\n问：请——先生，先生。你所说的“我们”是什么意思？\n\n答：我只说了“我”。也许是口译员将其口译为“我们”，但我只说“我”。\n\n问：好的。现在，你是否知道，你在第二次修订起诉状的表面上实际请求了超过 50,000 dollars 的款项？\n\n答：是的，我知道。\n\n问：你是否知道，你还请求了惩罚性赔偿金？\n\n答：是的，我知道。但你看，事情是，过去，他曾经——不是过去。我知道，因为他给我造成了如此多的损害，而且他有数千万——数千万美元。\n\n我知道。而且他——他的所作所为给我造成了如此多的破坏，给我造成了如此多的威胁，又给我造成了如此多的恐惧，而且全部是因为——因为他对我作出了那些恶意、诽谤性的指控和主张，说我是强奸犯，说我是杀人犯，说我是罪犯。因此，当我向他请求该惩罚性赔偿金时，确实完全是出于善意，而且他完全有能力支付。\n\n而且你看，他和他的个人雇员 Marco 给 Department of Justice 写信，称我被 Chinese government 在 China 通缉。\n\n我从未见过任何称我被 Chinese government 在 China 通缉的此类文件。那么他们从哪里得到这些政府——他们伪造了该文件，而这一切都是因为他们意图将我驱逐回 China，交到 Chinese government 手中，然后希望我死亡。因此，这就是恶意。\n\n现在，你认为那种损害能够得到支付，而且仅凭数万或那种数额的惩罚性赔偿金就足以支付吗？\n\n问：谢谢。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\n问：请，没有问题。请原谅我，请原谅我，没有问题。请原谅我。请原谅我。请原谅我。当时没有尚待回答的问题。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\n答：但我还没有说完。我还没有答完。\n\n嗯，你看，他所说的一切都已被转发，并在中国大陆传播，转发给数百万、数千万，也许数亿观众。\n\n而且那些信息不断称我为郭强奸犯和郭罪犯，并称美国 Department of Justice 将把我驱逐回 China，然后称我是农民，使用尽可能肮脏的词语，而这些言词和信息将一直伴随我——\n\n……他必须对其雇员、其个人雇员 Marco 负责，Marco 一直对我作出所有这些指控，散布恶意谣言，并议论我。他必须承担该责任。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\n问：没有问题。没有问题吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 先生（加文曼先生）：我们可以等到下一个问题提出后。Wolman 先生提出一个问题，然后你可以继续回答。\n\n问：你提到了我的当事人向 Department of Justice 发出的一封信。你为何没有提交它？\n\n答：嗯，问题在于，那份文件是 Cheng Shuiyan 和他的个人雇员 Marco 写给 DOJ 的，是他本人。他们公开谈论过它，并在网上、互联网上发推谈论过它。\n\n因此，应当由他们去取得该文件并向你提供。那是他们的文件，而且已经寄送给 DOJ。我怎么能取得这样的文件？我怎么能从 DOJ 取得它？\n\n然而，他们已经发推谈论它，并在 Google、网上公开谈论它，而且它一直以那种说法骚扰我，他们造成的损害确实，你知道，无法估量。这就是为什么必须请求损害赔偿。\n\n问：你说——你没有该文件，对吗？你——没有——没有——\n\n（同时交谈）\n\nWOLMAN 先生（沃尔曼先生）：律师，请指示你的\n\n生命。它绝不会被抹除，也永远无法消失。\n\n因此，你看，这就是对我善意的回报：一开始，我只和他共进过一次晚餐；而且在那段时间里，我非常友善，也非常好。然后，他却以如此恶意对待我，颠倒黑白，并用各种名称辱骂我。当然，我会追究他。我绝不会放弃就损害追究他。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\n问：等一下，等一下，这不是对我问题的回应。你又在拖延发言。\n\nGavenman先生（加文曼先生）：这不是拖延发言。\n\n你无需让你的当事人等待一个问题。他作出回答，我现在可以再问一个问题。这就是其运作方式。\n\nGavenman先生：Jay（杰伊），当你的当事人在做令人难以置信的事情时，你没有遵守任何指示。他正在作答，作出完整回答。你必须让他完整地回答。\n\nWolman先生（沃尔曼先生）：他在拖延发言。\n\nGavenman先生：你正在就这份文件、为何未提交该文件提出问题，而他正在给你回答。\n\n问：你有这份文件吗？\n\n答：所以，我尚未完成对我前一个问题的回答。\n\nGavenman先生：你需要允许他完成回答。这在证言录取中是基本规则。他必须能够完成回答。你问了为什么没有。他有一个尚待回答的问题，必须能够完成回答。\n\nWolman先生：那不是回应性的。\n\nGavenman先生：事实并非如此。他当时在谈论文件及其下落。\n\nWolman先生：那么我撤回前一个问题。\n\n问：我的问题是，你是否有那份文件的副本？\n\n答：我需要继续回答我前一个问题。\n\n问：不，我已经撤回那个问题。\n\nGavenman先生：他已撤回那个问题。\n\n这基本上是同一个问题。你可以解释你为什么有或没有对该问题的回答。\n\n问：你有那份文件吗？无需解释。是或否。你有吗？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\nWolman先生：申请删除，理由是不具回应性。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\n答：但是你不能——你不能——你不知道我在回答什么，律师。\n\n问：我听得已经够久了，足以明白“是”和“否”用普通话怎么说。\n\n答：这是我回答你问题的权利，而且我在说中文，你不知道我在说什么。你必须允许我回答你的问题。\n\n问：我听到了你的回答，包括 Marco（马可）和我当事人的姓名。我想知道的是，你是否有那封信，仅此而已。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\n申请删除。\n\n答：Marco 和他的老板有它。\n\n问：你有它吗？\n\n答：我没有。\n\n问：你曾经有过它吗？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：你曾经见过它吗？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：谢谢，这样就够简单了。\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的证言记录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n问：你是否向你的律师提供过任何用于回应本案文件出示请求的文件？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：什么文件？\n\n问：你是否知道你的律师在本案中向我们提交了文件？\n\n答：当然知道。\n\n问：你知道那些文件是什么吗？\n\n答：当然知道。\n\n问：很好。那么，你是否把其中任何文件交给他？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：当然。\n\n问：你把哪些文件交给了他？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n口译员：律师，我可以要求证人澄清一下吗？因为我听不清楚。\n\nWolman先生：当然。\n\n答：你所见到的文件是由我们的律师提供的，而该文件系由我向我的律师提供的。\n\n不过，不过，我没有 Marco 或 Cheng Shuiyan（程水燕）写给 DOJ（美国司法部）的那份文件，所以我实际上想要求他们取得那份文件。\n\n问：我问的是针对文件出示请求所提交的任何文件，而不是你的书面质询答复。你是否向你的律师提供过其中任何文件，以供提交？\n\n答：是的，我向我的律师提供了那些文件。\n\n问：哪些文件？\n\n答：你能看到的任何文件，大部分都是由我提供的。\n\n问：很好。你是如何把它们交给他的？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我把它交给了我的律师。就是这样。\n\n问：你把它们交给了 Gavenman 先生？\n\n答：我的意思是，我把它们交给了 Golden Spring（黄金之泉）的律师。\n\n问：你在哪里找到这些文件，以交给 Golden Spring 的律师？\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的证言记录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n答：我不知道你在说哪一份文件。\n\n问：其中任何一份。\n\n答：我无法就所有文件作答。文件太多了。\n\n问：挑一份你交给 Golden Spring 律师的文件，并告诉我它来自哪里。\n\n答：但我认为，作为律师，你不应当使用“其中任何一份”这样笼统的措辞。你知道，我不认为这是专业律师应当说的话。\n\n问：我原以为这次会得到对该问题的实际回答。\n\n口译员：这是向证人提出的问题吗？\n\nWolman先生：删除那句话。法庭速记员女士，请重复我的问题。\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n口译员：你的意思是向证人重复口译，还是要求法庭速记员重复问题——\n\nWolman先生：读回问题，然后你再重新口译。\n\n（宣读记录）\n\n答：我不明白。我不知道该挑哪一份文件。\n\n而且，你看，有数千页文件，所以我应该知道要挑哪一份并谈论它来自哪里。\n\n此外，翻译中说的是“其中任何一份文件”。你知道，在我的人生中，我从来没有任何东西可以被称为“其中任何一份文件”这样笼统的说法。要么是对的，要么是错的。\n\n问：你汇集后交给 Golden Spring 律师的那数千页文件在哪里？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：你何时把这些文件交给这位律师？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，在过去几年中有很多次，我不知道你具体指的是哪一次。\n\n问：就本案向你提出的第二次修订文件出示请求而言，请说明你为查找可供提交的文件做了什么。\n\nGavenman先生：我必须提醒你，不要披露你在律师—当事人沟通中听到的任何有关你的律师在脱离你单独行事的内容。\n\n这应仅限于你所了解的事项，仅限于你所做的事项，而不包括你从对你的律师所做之事的理解中得出的事项。\n\n答：我的回答是，我不记得。\n\n问：你是否查找过任何文件以回应本案？\n\n答：当然。\n\n问：你在哪里查找？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：如果我现在重新向你提出同样的问题，你会去哪里查找？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不知道。我不太明白你的意思。\n\n问：为了回应文件出示请求而提供或查找的文件，难道是凭空出现的吗？\n\nGavenman先生：再次提醒你，凡是你从你的律师或律师—当事人沟通中得知的任何事情，请不要披露该等沟通。在你在此之外知悉任何事情的范围内，你可以自由回答。\n\n答：嗯，当然，我与律师之间谈话中的任何内容，我不能在这里谈。我不能在这里谈。\n\n但就我自己而言，我是如何查找那些文件的，我只是记不起来了。我不记得。\n\n问：如果今天有人要求你查找它们，你会去哪里找？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：好的，比如说，Marco 与 Cheng Shuiyan 之间的沟通，这类证据。Marco 是 Cheng Shuiyan 的私人雇员，他们说，他们声称他们写信给 DOJ。\n\n他们还称要把我驱逐出境。然后他们在网上说我是骗子、我是强奸犯，诸如此类；而这一切，他们都承认了，并且公开如此对待。\n\n因此，你只需在网上搜索即可查找到这些信息，这是一种方式。他们还打电话。例如，我给他们在中国大陆谈过话的人打电话。我给 Lude（路德）打电话，他们曾与他谈过——谈过他们想让他做什么或说什么。\n\n因此，所有这些——然后我打电话给他们并得到那些回答，这就是查找那些信息的一种方式。\n\n还有，正如我所说，后来 Marco——你知道，Marco 和 Cheng Shuiyan 谈论过他们所做的一切，他们在网上发了推文；你在网上搜索，就能获得所有这些信息。后来，在 Nevada（内华达州）案件之后，他消失了，Marco 消失了。他是 Cheng Shuiyan 的私人雇员。\n\n所以，无论他做了什么或说了什么，Cheng Shuiyan 都应当负责。\n\n因此，所有这些实际上都出现在网上，因为他们在网上有许多发推文的人，他们公开发出推文。这是查找那些信息的一种方式。\n\n问：但是，你会去哪里寻找回应这些请求的文件？\n\nGavenman先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，例如，当我们——当你看到，例如，Cheng Shuiyan 报称他有十亿美元资产，他声称自己是某种人；但对于所有这类声称，当然我可以给中国的人打电话，试图核实他所声称的话。因此，这是一种查找方式。\n\n此外，Cheng Shuiyan 和 Marco，Marco 是他的私人雇员，他需要——Cheng Shuiyan 需要对 Marco 所说和所做的一切负责，因为他是 Marco 的老板。\n\n因此，那需要——那是公开的。\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的证言记录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n问：本案中的任何文件是否由你的律师提供给你？\n\nGavenman先生：异议，已经问过并回答过大约四次。\n\nWolman先生：问过，是；回答，否。\n\nGavenman先生：他正在回答问题。这是回应性文件的一部分——我不想提出陈述式异议，但这些是——那是他的回答，而且那是他的回答有其理由。\n\nWolman先生：你提交的任何文件是否来自他？\n\nGavenman先生：他显然已经回答了该问题，而我不是正在接受证言录取的人，所以你可以提问，他正在回答，我们可以继续。\n\nWolman先生：他没有回答。他似乎不记得提交了哪些文件、他提交了什么，或者文件来自哪里。所以我正在问你。\n\nGavenman先生：今天不是对我进行证言录取。因此，你可以提问——\n\nWolman先生：实际上，现在我正在与你进行会谈协商，因为我不确定——\n\nGavenman先生：在他接受证言录取时，这不是进行会谈协商的时间和地点。而且我知道你知道这一点。现在不是会谈协商的时间。因此，继续你的证言录取；如果你愿意，我们之后可以进行会谈协商。\n\nWolman先生：嗯，看起来好像是这样。\n\n……知情，这些就是我们所知道的事情。\n\n当我们在 Nevada（内华达州）提起本案时，我们是善意提起本案的。其证明和证据在于，我们仅主张了一笔非常小的金额，并未主张数百万美元，尽管他曾自己声称其资产账户中有那十亿美元。\n\n但当然，在谈到中国的人时，后来很多人被失踪；而且，他给我造成了所有这些毁灭和各种伤害，我们并未索要数以百万计的赔偿。\n\n证人席译员：律师，有问题吗？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：没有。\n\n问：您说 Cheng Shuiyan 对您造成了很多伤害。您如何评估该伤害？\n\n答：嗯，这将会是一个非常、非常长的故事。您需要做一些准备。这将会是一个很长的故事。\n\n问：不，我问的是您如何评估该伤害。\n\n答：嗯，您看，我目前正在准备某些前提，以评估 Cheng Shuiyan 所造成的毁灭和伤害。我一直在联系日本、Hong Kong（香港）、PRC（中华人民共和国）、U.S.（美国）的人，以及此前的一些合作伙伴。\n\n您看，目前这些人中有很多受到威胁，他们不愿意，您知道，作为证人说明他们所受威胁和损害的程度；他们知道 Cheng Shuiyan 及其私人雇员 Marco（马可）对我造成了什么，因为他们也受到某种威胁，而且他们知道 Cheng Shuiyan 及其私人雇员 Marco 公开指称，我将被 Department of Justice（司法部）驱逐至中国大陆，我将被驱逐至中国大陆；他们曾在 Twitter（推特）和 Geteer 上作出这类指称，说我将被驱逐——不仅说我将被驱逐。他们一直说我将被中国政府枪杀。他们不断重复这种说法，致使许多曾与我共事的人感到非常恐惧。\n\n因此，他使我失去了咨询工作，也给我造成了很多这类损害；这些损害无法计算。如果我评估这种价值，我认为至少会是数千万美元。\n\n问：您说他使您失去了咨询工作并造成损害。是什么咨询工作，什么损害？\n\n答：我不能在这里回答您。\n\n问：为什么不能？\n\n答：因为目前我就是记不起来。\n\n问：但不知何故——您记不起那些价值数千万美元的工作？\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：对问法提出异议。\n\n答：答：这是因为——这是因为——嗯，\n\n这对我们就他是否确实进行了适当搜索进行协商会有用。然后，或许一旦我们确定，嗯，他没有向您提供任何文件，我们就可以据此继续。\n\n但如果您愿意，我们可以继续，当然。不过，我当时是想让这对您更容易一些。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：感谢您的关心和体谅。一如既往。请继续。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：没问题。\n\n问：您是如何得出以下数额的：您对 Jonathan Ho 的主张价值 5 million；您对 Jianbin Yuan 的主张价值 5 million；您对 Liang 的主张价值 100 million；您对 Baotang 的主张价值 1 million；您对 Eliang Xia 的主张价值 5 million；您对 Xianmin Xiong 的主张价值 100 million？\n\n证人席译员：律师，我可能需要您重复那些名字。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：当然。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：我想提醒的是，在该等信息中，凡是您对于为何将该等内容写入各项起诉状、或数额如何确定的任何了解，若来自律师，则您不应披露该等沟通内容。\n\n在不披露律师与客户之间沟通内容的范围内，您可以回答。\n\n证人席译员：律师，您说 5 million，第一个名字是 Jonathan？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：Jun Chen，亦称 Jonathan Ho。\n\n证人席译员：这是同一个人，对吗？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：是。\n\n证人席译员：而且是 5 million？\n\nWOLMAN 律师：是。\n\n证人席译员：然后是 100 million，Liang，某个 Liang；以及 1 million，Baotang，Baotang；5 million，Xia——什么。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：Y-E-L-I-A-N-G，X-I-A。\n\n证人席译员：然后是 100 million，Xiong 什么？姓氏。\n\nWOLMAN 律师：100 million 的是 X-I-A-N-M-I-N，X-I-O-N-G。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：请稍等。请记住我关于律师与客户之间沟通内容的指示。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：当然，然后他可以回答该部分——\n\n（同时交谈）\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：——并说明这是律师与客户之间的沟通。他可以这样做。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\nWOLMAN 律师：他不必披露律师与客户之间的沟通内容。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：不要披露任何内容。\n\nGAVENMAN 律师：再次强调，在该回答会披露您与律师之间任何法律策略的范围内，您不得谈论该部分。\n\n问：那么，Guo 先生，在不告诉我您与律师实际进行过的任何沟通的情况下，为什么您决定采取行动，并在同一天提起四起案件？\n\n源自律师—当事人沟通的任何理解。\n\nWOLMAN先生（沃尔曼）：这不正确。他可以披露——\n\n源自该等沟通的任何理解。\n\nGAVENMAN先生（加文曼）：这是我对我的当事人的指示。这是法官应当裁决的问题。\n\nWOLMAN先生：不是理解，不是某种理解。\n\nWOLMAN先生：那是妨碍。Jeff，你需要了解一下特权。这不是其运作方式。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：Jay，非常好，感谢你一如既往地如此出色地提供帮助。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：而且我正是沿着这个思路说的。\n\n请继续。他不能回答该问题，如果该问题涉及来自其律师的受律师—当事人特权保护的信息和策略。\n\nWOLMAN先生：不，你没有。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：如果你回答该问题——\n\n如果他说他可以单独回答，他可以自由回答。\n\n（同时交谈）\n\nGAVENMAN先生：你问的是你为什么认为这会是一个好主意——我假定其中至少有一部分回答受到律师—当事人特权的涵盖。\n\n问：回答该问题。\n\n答：嗯，实际上没有其他理由。只是我们审视了所有案件，以合并的方式，我们审视了所有这些事项，然后律师建议，你知道，将那四个案件安排在同一天进行，仅此而已。\n\n如果不是这样，在不受特权保护的范围内，他可以自由回答。\n\n问：我有点困惑，因为这些案件已经提交，其中两个在纽约，一个在新泽西，一个在弗吉尼亚。\n\n在其源自律师就某些事情将如何发生、为什么某些事情会以特定方式发生所作讨论的范围内，那些是他不能披露的特权沟通。\n\n怎么会是同一位律师提出将它们全部安排在同一天的想法？\n\nWOLMAN先生：即使这是他的律师告诉他的一个想法，他仍然可以说，我因为“X”而决定做某事。\n\n答：我不知道。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：嗯，如果这是特权沟通和受特权保护的理解——\n\n问：你知道案件何时代表你提交吗？\n\nWOLMAN先生：我并没有问他——特权适用于你和你的律师之间的沟通。特权并不适用于——\n\n答：当然知道。\n\n答：嗯，我实际上相当好奇，律师，你为什么如此纠缠于这个关于在同一天提交案件的问题。我的意思是，这是一个如此奇怪且令人好奇的问题。\n\n为什么案件不能在同一天提交，有什么不对？\n\n案件 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/129122113:56:184 dPage 44 of\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的庭审记录\n\n43（169 至 172）\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n问：如果我记得没错，这实际上是我第一次听到这个问题。事实上，我想说的是，我实际上不记得这四个案件是在同一天提交的。因此，如果不是你不断询问这四个案件都在同一天提交的问题，我不会知道有这样四个案件，而且它们都是在同一天提交的。我确实毫不知情。\n\n问：你是否记得回答过该案件中的书面质询？\n\n答：你是指对哪个案件中的哪一项书面质询作出的何种答复？\n\n问：你与 Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方利润有限公司）之间是什么关系？\n\n问：你是否记得回答过该案件中的书面问题？\n\nGAVENMAN先生：根据律师的建议，Guo先生（郭先生）拒绝回答该问题，并援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利。\n\n答：我不记得全部内容。\n\nWOLMAN先生：他曾对 Strategic Vision（战略愿景）提起诉讼，并在其中承认他是该公司的负责人——\n\n问：在对其中第1号书面质询的答复中，载明，引用如下，我将向你指出 Bates 编号 3733：“原告答复称，其是一名没有工资或收入的企业家。”该陈述是否准确？\n\nGAVENMAN先生：我明白。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：根据律师的建议，Guo先生拒绝回答该问题，并援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利。\n\nWOLMAN先生：——在 Southern District of New York（纽约南区）。\n\n问：你是否拒绝回答该问题？\n\nGAVENMAN先生：我明白。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你是否拒绝回答？\n\n问：在该陈述作出并提交之日，即 November 18, 2019，该陈述是否准确？\n\n口译员：我还没有翻译。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：根据律师的建议，Guo先生拒绝回答该问题，并援引《美国宪法》第五修正案规定的权利。\n\nWOLMAN先生：谢谢。\n\n答：是。\n\n答：我们的时间安排如何？我还有其他事务。\n\n问：你是否拒绝回答？\n\nWOLMAN先生：我想我至少还有一个小时。\n\n答：是。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：五十九分钟。\n\n问：你是否与 Xianmin Xiong（熊先民）先生就该案件达成和解？\n\n问：你在证据开示答复中向我们提供了你在你对 Xianmin Xiong（X-I-A-N-M-I-N，X-I-O-N-G）提起的诉讼中对书面质询所作的答复和异议。你是否记得在该事项中回答过书面质询？\n\n答：嗯，首先，我必须告诉你，那个名字的发音不正确，对吗？\n\n答：我实际上不认识这个人，Xianmin Xiong，或者也许是口译员没有正确翻译该名字。\n\n而且我可以说，即使截至今日，该案件也并未完全和解。\n\n问：也被称为 X-I、N-U-O，也被称为 Frank，也被称为 Xino，也被称为 X-I-N-O。\n\n问：你是否知道一份撤诉协议于 September 15, 2020 提交？\n\n答：所以名字是 Xiong Xianmin。我知道，我知道这个案件。\n\n答：嗯，那只是其中一个案件，还有其他与 Xianmin Xiong 有关联的案件。\n\n案件 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/0254Enteried0091137221137569615 dPage 45 of\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的庭审记录\n\n44（173 至 176）\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n问：该案件是在不影响再次起诉的情况下被驳回的，对吗？\n\n答：不是这样。\n\n问：你是说提交至纽约州法院电子系统的文件不正确吗？\n\nGAVENMAN先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，也许该文件没有错，但还有许多其他与 Xianmin Xiong 有某种关联的案件。\n\n问：Xiong Xianmin，或者不论你如何发音，或者任何代表他的人，是否为该案件以不影响再次起诉的方式撤销而支付过任何款项？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：为什么你会在未获得任何付款的情况下，使其以不影响再次起诉的方式撤销？\n\nGAVENMAN先生：在你能够回答而不披露你与律师之间沟通的任何法律策略的范围内，你可以自由回答。\n\n答：嗯，那是我与律师共同制定的策略。\n\n问：你起诉那位先生索赔 100 million dollars。你不记得了吗？\n\n答：记得。\n\n问：在未获得一分钱赔偿的情况下驳回该案件，对你有什么好处？\n\nGAVENMAN先生：对问题形式提出异议。对问题形式提出异议，并作出同样的提醒。\n\n答：嗯，那实际上是我与律师共同制定的策略。\n\n问：我明白。我不需要知道是否是律师告诉你的。我需要知道那如何使你受益。\n\nGAVENMAN先生：同样的提醒。\n\n答：嗯，整个事项尚未结束。\n\n问：既然该案已被不影响再次起诉地驳回，哪一部分仍在进行？\n\n答：嗯，我不能只是——我不能告诉你，因为那是我和我的律师制定的策略。\n\n问：那位律师是 Steinberg先生（斯坦伯格）吗？\n\n答：其中一位。\n\n问：你是否对 Xianmin Xiong，或者不论你如何发音，又提起了其他诉讼？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在哪里？在哪个法院？\n\n答：纽约。\n\n问：你是否提交了该起诉状的副本？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：你何时对 Xianmin Xiong 提起这起新案件？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：你是否知道，为何纽约法院电子系统中目前不存在你与 Xianmin Xiong 之间的案件，除已通过协议驳回的那一案件外？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Yanping Wang（王艳萍），又名 Yvette Wang（王伊薇特），是谁？\n\n答：她来自 Golden Spring（金泉）。\n\n问：她在 Golden Spring 担任什么职务？\n\n答：她是总裁。\n\n问：你是否知道她针对 Xianmin Xiong 提起的诉讼？\n\n答：知道。\n\n问：如有的话，你在该诉讼中的角色是什么？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：你是否曾就该诉讼与 Wang女士交谈？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我想确认我理解正确。你是——Yanping Wang，也就是 Yvette Wang，是 Golden Spring 的总裁；Golden Spring 正在为你在本案中的抗辩提供资金，并且还向我的当事人支付了判决款项，但你从未与她讨论过本案，对吗？\n\nGAVENMAN先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York Limited（金泉纽约有限公司）是否有财务主管？\n\n答：当然有。\n\n问：你是否曾就本案与该财务主管讨论？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Golden Spring Limited（金泉有限公司）的财务主管叫什么名字？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：除 Wang女士外，你能确认 Golden Spring 的哪位管理人员？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Golden Spring 是如何得知要支付 Cheng先生（程先生）在 Nevada（内华达）案件中对你作出的判决的？\n\n答：嗯，律师之间的沟通。\n\n问：你是否知道 Golden Spring 中由谁发起向我们律师事务所进行的电汇？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：你是否知道 Golden Spring 中谁有权发起资金电汇？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：你向我们提供了一些短信。\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：我在问你，你是否想要更改\n\n问：除你以外，是否有人获授权将以你为收款人的支票存入？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：你是否已就2020日历年度申报所得税税表？\n\n答：当然。\n\n问：你是否在该税表中将这笔12,000 dollar的判决付款列为收入？\n\nGavenman（加文曼）先生：根据律师意见，Guo（郭文贵）先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：你是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在你今天作出的回答中——现在你已有一天时间思考——是否有任何你希望更改的回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：是什么？\n\n答：嗯，你看，关于Marco（马可）及其与Cheng Shuiyan（程水燕）的雇佣关系，以及他们发布推文、网络消息，以及他们发送该消息的时间、消息内容和该关系——还有他们之间通过WhatsApp（WhatsApp）向Wang Ding Gang（王定刚）发送该消息——以及北京（北京）人员拜访Cheng Shuiyan并赠予其数百万美元，从而开始改变他与我之间事件走向一事，所有这些事项，我应当从头开始向你说明。\n\n口译员：律师，请让我把刚才发生的一切都翻译出来。\n\n还有涉及Cheng Shuiyan在Twitter（推特）这个平台上诽谤我的内容，关于我的家庭，并称我为强奸犯，称我为流氓，称我低级、农民，甚至——低级农民，并谈论我与Xi Jinping（习近平）有重大交易，所有这些，我也想开始向你说明。\n\n还有，我想向你说明Cheng Shuiyan在Twitter上谈论的、有关写信给DOJ（美国司法部）的部长或部门负责人的事项，并声称他——他们要将我驱逐至中国，并称我是罪犯、我是被通缉者；所有这些事项，我实际上都想向你说明。\n\n答：好的，所以你看到的这些变更，我刚刚提到的所有这些事情，对，实际上——我记得我回答你时说是May，但实际上这一切从March, 2018开始，一直持续到August，然后我在September of 2018起诉了他。因此，那将是我希望作出的变更。\n\n问：回到你在Virginia就Baosheng（宝胜）提起的诉讼，该案起诉状第107段称：“Guo基于这些虚假陈述采取行动并依赖这些陈述，在其总共向Baosheng支付42,000 dollars时。”我要问你的是，这42,000 dollars的来源是什么？\n\nWolman（沃尔曼）先生：在你提出你的口头异议之前——\n\nGavenman先生：不，这是根据律师意见对该问题作出的回应——\n\nWolman先生：我想确认一下——本案，本案已经审理过，因此我问的是——所以他显然已就向Baosheng付款一事提出了证据。因此我的问题是——该事项现已进入公共领域和公开记录。因此，我在此的问题是，这笔钱的来源是什么？\n\nGavenman先生：Guo先生拒绝在今天就该事项作证，援引《美国宪法》第五修正案所赋予的权利。\n\n问：你是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你是否在该案审判中作证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你是否作证称你向Baosheng Guo（郭宝胜）支付了42,000 dollars？\n\n答：嗯，Baosheng Guo在2011年是Cheng Shuiyan在这整项攻击我的事务中的合伙人，并且他是与Cheng Shuiyan一起攻击我的人中最为积极的人员之一。\n\nWolman先生：我请求法庭书记员将该回答作为不具回应性回答予以删除。\n\n问：你是否作证称你向Baosheng Guo支付了——你支付了Baosheng Guo 42,000 dollars？\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）的证言记录\n\n于April 1, 2021进行\n\n问：你是否就他要求的各种金额向Baosheng Guo开具支票？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：钱是如何从你那里转给——42,000 dollars是如何从你那里转给Baosheng Guo的？\n\nGavenman先生：根据律师意见，Guo先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：你是否拒绝回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：无论你用于向Baosheng Guo付款的是哪个账户或哪些账户，现在其中有多少钱？\n\nGavenman先生：根据Guo先生律师的意见，Guo先生援引《美国宪法》第五修正案所赋予的权利，拒绝回答该问题。\n\n问：你是否有向Guo先生、Baosheng Guo付款的任何记录？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：谁会有记录——删除该问题。\n\n你与Baosheng Guo之间审判中，是否将这些付款记录作为证据提出？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你是否控制那些证物？\n\nGavenman先生：异议，对形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不太确定我理解你的意思。\n\n问：你或你的律师是否持有你与Baosheng Guo之间审判中提出的证物副本？\n\n答：我实际上不太理解你——你的问题是什么意思。我不明白。\n\n问：Broadcasting Board of Governors（广播理事会）是什么？\n\n口译员：律师，那是一家公司还是——\n\nWolman先生：一家公司。\n\n口译员：它是一家公司？\n\nWolman先生：一个实体。是。\n\n答：我无法准确理解这是什么意思。我完全不理解这个问题。\n\n口译员：我们还有问题吗？\n\n于April 1, 2021进行\n\n证物索引：\n\n编号 说明 页码：\n\n证物1 经修订的证言记录通知\n\n证物2 被告Wengui Guo（郭文贵）根据Local Civil Rule 26.1提交的经核实声明\n\n证物3 题为“Complaint（起诉状）”的文件\n\n证物4 起诉状及陪审团审判请求\n\n证物5 被告Wengui Guo对起诉状的答辩\n\n证物6 被告Wengui Guo的初步披露 123\n\n证物7 被告Wengui Guo对原告Logan Cheng（程龙）的第二次修订后的首套文件出示请求所提出的异议和答复\n\n证物8 被告Wengui Guo对原告Logan Cheng的首套询问书所提出的异议和答复 125\n\n证明\n\nSTATE OF NEW JERSEY）\n\n）ss：\n\nCOUNTY OF UNION\n\n本人，MARY F. BOWMAN（玛丽·F·鲍曼），注册专业记录员、认证实时记录员及纽约州和新泽西州境内的公证人，特此证明：\n\n上文所载证人HOWAN KWOK已由本人依法宣誓，且该证言记录是该证人所作证词的真实记录。\n\n本人进一步证明，本人与本诉讼任何一方均无血缘或婚姻关系，且本人对本案结果不存在任何利益关系。\n\n兹证明，本人于April, 2021的第2日签署本证明。\n\nMARY F. BOWMAN, RPR, CRR\n\n案件22-50073\n\n文件102-1\n\n提交于03/19/22\n\n录入于03/19/22 13:56:36\n\n第51页，共92页\n\n案件22-50073\n\n文件102-1\n\n提交于03/19/22\n\n录入于03/19/22 13:56:36\n\n第52页，共92页\n\n案件22-50073\n\n文件102-1\n\n提交于03/19/22\n\n录入于03/19/22 13:56:36\n\n第53页，共92页\n\nHowan Kwok的证言记录，于April 1, 2021进行\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案件22-50073\n\n文件102-1\n\n提交于03/19/22\n\n录入于03/19/22 13:56:36\n\n第54页，共92页\n\n基于 149:22, 150:19, 95:3, 96:21，利益 150:25, 153:25, 97:5, 99:24, 173:19 5:9, 46:2, 57:7, 72:17, 154:4, 154:9, 106:3, 107:5，受益 156:9, 158:22, 107:21, 90:14, 103:12, 107:25, 174:2 164:21, 165:18, 108:1, 108:6, 130:15, 130:20，旁边 153:11 166:17, 168:11, 108:8, 127:6, 33:23，基本 174:9, 177:13, 128:11, 149:15，最佳 57:19 177:18 154:16, 163:9, 5:17, 19:5，基本上，已经 183:17, 187:12 34:16, 35:3. 9:14，开始 98:3 6:3, 41:3 11:19, 127:12，依据 12:1，Bethesda（贝塞斯达）13:23, 14:1，开始 45:15, 75:1, 3:14 14:4, 15:14, 134:14, 182:8 84:10, 162:16，背叛 15:17, 20:12，开始，贝茨编号 108:3 40:23, 57:8, 22:8 160:10, 171:10，更好 57:18, 62:12，代表，浴室 116:3, 116:4 66:19, 79:18, 30:14, 30:17, 101:25, 102:6，之间 79:20, 84:14, 37:2, 36:8, 154:13 4:4, 6:22, 85:12, 86:12，持有 37:5, 39:3, 13:15, 13:17, 87:9, 91:2, 39:8, 47:18, 88:13, 132:25 17:12, 20:13, 95:2, 96:3, 51:5, 70:5，因为 25:17, 32:3. 96:20, 97:6, 168:18, 173:4, 6:15, 9:7, 55:9, 100:10, 100:25, 110:3, 179:8 9:13, 9:14, 144:6, 144:15, 111:7, 110:4，行为 16:17, 17:6, 156:9, 156:10, 111:19, 111:25, 96:23 18:10, 20:12, 157:14, 166:23, 113:4, 113:5，存在 24:11, 25:25, 167:9, 173:12, 113:18, 113:21, 12:16, 13:21, 26:7, 32:2, 173:24, 175:1, 114:12, 116:12, 20:21, 20:24, 34:4, 34:11, 177:1, 182:2. 118:13, 116:13, 21:3, 57:14, 36:23, 53:14, 185:25, 186:10 120:6, 122:22, 78:4, 78:5, 53:22, 54:15，超出 124:12, 133:25, 95:5, 98:1, 55:11, 56:15, 79:24 134:1, 135:24, 99:17, 100:7, 58:19, 59:21，Bhattacharya（巴塔查里亚）138:7, 147:1, 103:12, 108:1, 77:16, 77:19, 3:11 149:14, 153:18, 110:4, 110:12, 77:25, 86:11，Biden's（拜登的）154:12, 154:14, 86:19, 93:15, 113:20, 115:19, 34:20 174:4 144:12, 147:19, 94:18, 96:11，大，在……之前 98:1, 98:10, 148:1, 148:8, 182:14 2:9, 4:15, 149:22, 167:20, 99:15, 99:22，账单 4:18, 8:5, 8:6, 171:21, 173:5, 107:23, 109:25, 51:11, 56:5, 11:13, 15:1, 176:12 112:12, 113:3, 62:21 16:21, 17:16，北京 113:13, 114:4，十亿 17:19, 17:22, 115:25, 118:18, 92:20, 93:4, 108:4, 130:21, 20:11, 22:22, 182:4 128:19, 129:2, 146:2, 146:19, 23:3, 24:7, 129:10，相信 129:11, 159:25, 160:19 24:12, 24:13, 129:20, 131:8, 24:2, 28:17，亿万富翁 29:1, 25:7, 132:11, 37:20, 111:14, 132:17, 162:20 44:7, 55:14, 133:7, 139:20, 127:16, 178:4，账单 56:6, 59:2, 145:19, 148:5, 178:22 29:12, 29:17,\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交日期 03/19/22 登记日期 03/19/22 13:56:36 第55页，共92页\n\n案号 22:5007:30－DoOSIOZAK P 提交日期 03/11/02/2012022113:56:18 6 0 第56页，共92页\n\n11:14, 11:25 174:21, 174:25, 88:5, 95:7, 181:18, 183:1，照料 175:22, 175:23, 114:18, 114:24, 183:9 116:1, 129:22 110:19, 126:18, 176:5, 176:16，改变 177:14, 127:10, 148:23 177:12，中共的 9:15, 98:2 178:14, 178:16，谨慎 53:22, 78:1，变化 179:4, 179:21，手机 55:7 183:3 179:23, 180:3，承运人 59:6, 59:7，改变 60:13, 60:24 183:22, 184:12 61:14, 62:7, 94:4, 182:6，案件 62:18，案件 62:21，Chao（赵）8:1, 14:11, 97:5, 97:7, 91:19 13:5, 8:4, 14:17, 14:19, 97:22, 98:2, 14:20, 15:2，性质 14:23, 78:3, 98:4, 98:6, 16:21, 16:24, 9:9 153:7, 154:17, 98:8, 98:9, 16:25, 17:1，被指控 154:20, 154:24, 98:15, 17:2, 21:4, 98:16, 15:18, 66:20 163:10, 163:11, 98:18, 98:25, 26:19, 27:4，支票 167:6, 168:6, 36:8, 37:19, 99:1, 99:16, 58:16, 58:21, 168:9, 168:17, 100:2, 100:3, 43:9, 47:15, 88:4, 98:23, 168:22, 168:24, 100:7, 100:6, 47:18, 47:21, 179:12, 180:8, 169:9, 169:6, 100:8, 104:10, 48:1, 48:5, 180:12, 180:17, 169:11, 172:14, 77:18, 77:21, 104:14, 104:16, 180:23, 185:1 172:15, 172:25, 104:23, 104:24, 78:14, 80:18，支票 180:1 105:3, 105:7, 80:21, 80:22, 181:3，被抓获 113:20, 128:9, 81:5, 81:9，Chen（陈）100:21 128:10 83:15, 83:22, 152:7 84:18, 86:13，原因，蜂窝网络，Cheng（程）150:7 60:3, 60:5 87:3, 87:17, 1:4, 6:10，造成，厘米 93:5, 93:10, 15:22, 30:10, 96:19, 111:3, 131:7, 132:11, 60:25 49:12, 31:19, 111:8, 111:10, 136:4, 146:24，某些 51:25, 77:18, 111:15, 111:17, 149:4, 149:13, 6:24, 43:11, 78:14, 80:18, 149:21, 111:20, 111:22, 151:2, 122:4, 125:15, 82:15, 82:19, 153:12, 112:13, 112:14, 151:5, 166:11, 166:12, 86:13, 87:10, 113:6, 113:8, 153:16, 154:4, 166:13 91:10, 92:7, 113:18, 113:24, 154:10，当然 92:12, 92:13, 114:13, 114:17，谨慎 74:22, 109:20 92:21, 92:25, 121:6, 120:4, 16:5, 20:7，确定性 93:5, 93:8, 121:22, 123:4, 26:8, 25:4, 57:4 93:12, 93:19, 26:22, 28:15, 126:3, 139:4，证书 94:3, 94:5, 139:8, 142:23, 31:24, 52:1, 190:1 94:6, 94:12, 143:12, 145:13, 68:22, 69:20，已认证 94:22, 95:6, 146:14, 146:15, 103:22, 122:6, 2:10, 117:13, 95:25, 96:12, 147:5, 153:23, 142:25, 143:24, 190:6 96:16, 96:19, 154:3, 155:11, 163:12, 151:21，证明 96:23, 97:19, 155:17, 170:25, 173:22, 174:3 190:9, 190:15 97:25, 99:2, 171:2, 171:4，中共主席 100:14, 101:4, 171:6, 172:4, 77:17, 77:20, 21:24 103:19, 107:2, 172:10, 172:17, 77:23, 78:1，改变 107:19, 107:24, 173:5, 173:20, 78:10, 78:15, 109:6, 110:3, 19:20, 98:4，\n\n2021年4月1日进行的 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交日期 03/19/22 登记日期 03/19/22 13:56:36 第57页，共92页\n\n案号 22:5007:30－DoOSIOZ31KP 文件提交日期 3/119/02/113722113:56:18 68 第58页，共92页\n\n2021年4月1日进行的 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n评论 56:23, 57:4, 161:11, 161:16；计算机 57:9, 57:15, 97:5, 97:7；合并 168:7\n\n实施 65:25, 82:24, 75:3；已合并 83:4, 86:16, 98:7, 98:13, 98:14, 128:5, 168:7\n\n已实施 91:22, 92:17, 38:8, 41:15, 66:19, 67:3, 73:23, 73:25, 74:3, 74:12；共谋 128:6, 128:22, 111:16, 115:12, 116:5, 131:10, 131:11, 161:15，129:9, 129:15 114:19, 116:1\n\n普通 12:2, 160:3, 82:23, 83:4；公司 148:23, 160:5, 161:1；概念 101:23；共谋中 94:13；持续地 108:22, 134:5, 136:3\n\n沟通 63:22, 64:8, 12:10, 83:9, 179:25；公司 24:15, 24:17, 102:17, 122:4, 186:18, 186:19；结论 174:5；关切 156:9, 182:11；宪法 12:22, 24:22, 27:19, 27:25, 28:14, 28:24, 29:3, 30:6, 30:21, 31:5, 31:14\n\n已沟通 173:12；条件 126:12, 127:20；进行 148:14, 153:14, 37:10, 38:4, 38:17, 39:22\n\n通信 16:12, 16:14, 83:25, 83:23, 84:2, 90:15, 90:18, 103:13, 143:2, 144:15, 163:15, 164:1, 164:3, 164:6, 164:10, 166:14, 166:20, 176:17；比较 15:5, 126:8, 153:16；申诉 16:20, 17:5, 17:16, 17:19, 17:20, 17:22, 18:5, 103:19, 106:2, 106:23, 107:1, 107:22, 113:5, 113:22, 114:13, 121:2, 121:6, 121:18, 121:21, 132:5, 174:19, 183:12, 188:11, 188:12, 188:14；会谈 7:9, 148:4, 148:7, 148:9, 148:11, 148:13；商议 40:6, 40:20, 42:5, 41:8, 42:15, 44:14, 45:13, 45:3, 46:1, 46:12, 46:22, 48:13\n\n通信 16:7, 19:16, 20:9, 25:6, 26:10, 26:23, 28:17, 28:20, 31:23, 31:25, 41:10, 45:7, 45:18, 52:2, 69:9, 68:24, 69:10, 69:21, 69:24, 70:7, 73:1, 73:8, 90:22, 92:3, 103:15, 103:23, 104:1, 105:23, 122:7, 144:1, 144:2, 152:1, 152:4, 164:23, 165:5, 165:9, 165:12, 166:23, 167:4；确认 121:6, 121:18, 121:21, 132:5, 174:19, 183:12, 188:11, 188:12, 188:14，49:18, 50:7, 58:13；困惑 47:8, 99:22, 168:11，74:10, 75:19, 76:2, 76:15, 76:25, 90:4\n\n投诉 129:8, 129:9, 151:24；完成 65:11, 136:17, 136:18, 137:3, 137:5, 137:7；已完成 136:24；完全地 72:10, 84:13, 89:2, 112:15；复杂 54:14；遵守 172:15, 173:1, 178:14；考虑 12:4, 53:23, 115:13, 115:14；连接 64:22, 65:14, 129:8, 129:9，129:1, 129:3, 129:4, 129:15；已连接 159:17, 159:23, 161:23, 162:24, 163:6, 169:18, 171:16, 172:1, 181:13, 184:6, 185:10, 185:19；正在连接 129:15；连接 47:2, 64:21, 67:1, 67:10, 67:19, 69:5, 69:17, 105:1；顾问 12:1, 150:10, 150:15, 150:16；咨询 43:18；联系 56:16, 56:17\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交日期 03/19/22 登记日期 03/19/22 13:56:36 第59页，共92页\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交日期 03/19/22 登记日期 03/19/22 13:56:36 第60页，共92页\n\n案号 22:5007:30－DoO5I6231KP 提交日期 03/10/02/254 登记日期 003/113:56:161 第61页，共92页\n\n2021年4月1日进行的 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n128:17, 128:18, 128:23, 128:24, 129:2, 129:13；已停止 173:6, 173:8；文件 3:19, 18:16, 18:25, 22:8, 22:13, 22:18, 22:21, 23:3, 24:6, 25:2, 32:23, 32:25, 33:2, 33:5, 33:11, 33:13, 33:17, 106:5, 106:15, 106:21, 106:22, 107:4, 112:25, 120:24, 120:20, 122:18, 123:10, 124:4, 125:11, 127:24, 128:1, 128:2, 132:25, 137:10, 139:2, 139:6, 139:8, 139:10, 139:17, 140:5, 140:7, 140:11, 140:24, 142:4, 142:8, 142:9, 142:11, 142:15, 142:22, 142:24, 143:11, 143:21, 144:9, 145:23, 147:5, 147:12, 147:16, 147:23, 148:17, 154:23, 178:14, 188:21\n\n设备 102:22, 128:5；诊断为 170:12, 127:19；差异 82:14, 83:21, 17:12；不同 19:13, 20:13, 11:14, 16:17, 41:19, 118:16, 128:10, 159:2；一角硬币 163:21, 165:18, 173:20；Ding（丁）92:12, 91:18, 92:19, 93:3, 113:11, 182:2；晚餐 134:15；直接 10:17, 43:1, 67:25, 92:3；指示 15:15, 15:19, 53:9；直接地 173:19, 51:18, 161:17；董事 39:14；董事们 39:19；指示 6:25；不同意 69:11；消失 57:17, 57:23, 95:3, 95:4, 116:13, 134:12, 145:14, 146:23；失望 120:18；披露 117:2, 122:25, 123:3, 188:16；停止 172:13；案卷 178:16\n\n论述 6:22；证据开示 22:13, 22:18, 22:21, 23:3, 24:6, 25:2, 32:23, 32:25, 33:2, 33:5, 33:11, 33:13, 33:17, 106:5, 106:15, 106:21, 106:22, 107:4, 112:25, 120:24, 121:1, 121:10, 121:14, 121:16, 121:23, 122:2, 122:10, 122:21, 122:23, 123:5, 123:8, 123:13, 123:16, 124:6, 124:7, 124:10, 124:14, 125:9, 125:17, 125:20, 126:16, 126:25, 128:3, 133:4, 133:7, 135:16, 135:22, 135:23, 136:8, 136:21, 136:23, 137:1, 137:15, 137:24, 139:23, 140:2, 140:4, 140:3, 141:1, 142:2, 159:24, 160:9, 160:19, 175:23, 176:5；讨论 80:17, 80:21, 81:4, 81:9, 157:20, 160:9；讨论 159:24, 160:1；正在讨论 17:3, 178:6；讨论 163:19；讨论 166:11；不诚实 15:15, 15:19；驳回 128:3, 133:4, 133:7, 135:16, 135:22, 135:23；已驳回 135:25, 136:8, 136:21, 136:23, 137:1, 137:15, 137:24, 139:23, 140:2, 140:4, 140:3, 141:1, 142:2, 159:24, 172:20, 172:24, 188:11；显示 100:3, 100:6；正在显示 106:21, 122:22；处置 99:11, 103:2, 103:5；已处置 99:21, 100:12；扰乱 154:10；地区 1:1, 1:2, 6:11, 6:12, 155:23, 155:24, 169:25, 178:10, 180:24, 180:25；司法部 110:16, 110:17, 135:18, 135:24, 135:25, 144:18, 182:21；美元 132:13, 146:2, 178:17, 180:23, 181:8；美元 93:2, 108:3, 115:6, 130:22, 131:3, 132:4, 146:18, 146:19, 147:1, 150:23, 159:25, 160:19, 173:17, 178:20, 178:23, 179:13, 179:18, 180:18\n\n183:16, 184:15, 154:21 强调 17:21, 18:12, 184:24, 185:5 较早 34:5, 34:12, 112:23, 123:8 完成 14:10, 39:21, 47:8, 52:21, 强调了 52:22, 52:23, 20:10, 53:24, 89:17, 99:15, 108:6 78:24, 79:2, 79:18, 81:24, 126:7, 156:1。雇用 107:5, 112:25, 87:10, 110:20, 178:6, 180:15 11:25, 32:7, 120:19, 更容易 113:1, 122:18, 145:10, 55:24, 91:2 146:10, 151:25, 148:20 123:8, 123:9, 雇员 128:20, 128:21 154:1 东部 91:17, 39:10, 巨大的 门 169:13, 178:10, 92:12, 93:14, 153:18 110:23 180:24 94:6, 96:14, 向下 足够 容易 97:20, 97:25, 10:18, 85:19, 130:22, 12:3, 138:25 101:9, 108:13, 133:12, 138:7, 22:23, 23:1, 教育 108:17, 109:3, 63:16, 123:11, 138:25 89:20 109:7, 110:17, 157:15 113:12, 确保 效果 114:9, 6:21, 7:4, 下载 131:13, 132:24, 4:17 43:3 120:20 135:1, 135:2, 努力 楼下 135:18, 144:17, 进入 91:24 145:15, 36:7 54:23 146:8, 努力 149:21, 149:24, 整个 喝酒 102:25 153:17, 181:22 88:2, 99:18 76:5, 八 驾驶 雇员 完全 81:17 3:5 57:16, 57:21, 172:10 69:11, 任一 96:12 有权 驾驶员的 9:18, 12:25, 雇佣 10:1 106:22, 120:6, 13:12, 53:2, 12:2, 89:24 160:17, 188:11 正式地 74:19, 80:12, 空的 实体 190:12 6:3, 80:18, 80:19, 65:10 57:9, 186:21 重复的 97:17, 98:2, 鼓励 企业家 9:14 107:4, 122:17, 91:24 在……期间 142:10, 161:17, 171:11 结束 177:22 等同 21:2, 94:24, 92:18, 110:1, 电子的 34:13 98:22, 98:24, 100:5, 107:1, 172:21, 127:12 100:9, 擦除 背书 101:6, 105:21, 174:25 134:11 105:24, 134:15, Eliang 180:23 逃脱 155:6 151:16 敌人 129:21 引出 57:16, 78:2, 律师 E 115:11, 115:13, 72:25 3:7, 3:8, 3:15 电子邮件 消除 115:15 建立 65:20, 65:22, 从事 82:24, 83:4 25:7, 93:21 65:23, 65:24, 156:13, 156:16 Elliott 设立 66:2, 66:3, 从事 78:4 71:17, 90:5, 66:5, 104:19, Ellis 148:4 148:16 105:2 英语 179:10, 179:14 估计 每个 5:15, 5:16, 否则 157:23 6:16, 105:3, 17:7, 6:19, 估计的 80:22, 82:6, 108:5, 108:8, 17:8, 17:15, 112:1 136:5\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案件 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK，于 03/11/09/22/2113:56:18 提交，63，第 63 页，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录\n于 2021 年 4 月 1 日进行 民族 147:2, 183:23, 121:15, 121:17, 158:6 185:25 122:2, 122:22, 面孔 158:19, 159:2, 159:8 精确 122:24, 123:23, 158:7 123:24, 123:25, 评估 70:25 事实 124:21, 127:22, 153:9, 恰好 78:9, 153:11 78:20, 188:5, 188:7, 评估 77:17, 77:22, 87:9, 91:15, 188:8, 188:11, 95:3, 97:1, 153:13 78:10, 88:4, 甚至 95:25, 96:1, 188:12, 188:13, 97:8, 97:22, 188:15, 188:17, 52:25, 101:13, 109:5, 97:24, 98:21, 6:18, 142:19, 189:1, 189:3 113:7, 104:15, 110:9, 54:18, 65:25, 证物 165:22, 177:9, 110:13, 111:19, 71:16, 78:21, 186:4, 186:10 186:22 113:25, 114:16, 86:22, 100:23, 存在 审查 115:9, 154:14, 116:3, 146:18, 60:6 169:5, 153:16, 156:19, 188:2 160:6, 审查 预期 184:18 166:17, 172:10, 180:6, 182:13 6:5 164:18 事实 昂贵的 122:5, 153:12 事件 例子 92:22 事实性的 34:7, 182:6 34:19, 曾经 56:4, 87:13, 解释 94:18, 115:9 信念 7:16, 144:14, 144:16, 137:22 11:21, 144:25, 14:12, 145:25, 解释中 131:1, 131:21, 32:24, 146:1, 151:3, 132:21, 52:9, 52:12, 106:13 146:15, 63:13, 65:23, 156:23 解释 147:2, 153:22, 优秀 154:2 65:24, 66:3, 137:25 66:19, 116:25, 139:13, 虚假 69:16, 探索 140:16 46:7, 70:3, 91:2, 85:1 46:16, 102:9, 102:16, 除外 46:25, 67:9。暴露 103:4, 105:6, 4:9 71:5, 71:6, 88:9 123:5, 138:21, 73:9, 183:13 例外 延伸 138:23, 161:17, 熟悉 42:19 164:2 169:3, 180:17, 8:21, 15:21, 过量 程度 180:22 17:8, 23:8, 132:3 31:21, 69:22, 每一个 43:15, 47:5, 交换 90:14, 90:17, 24:11, 21:1, 48:17, 111:17, 93:14, 173:5 103:11, 103:24, 59:22, 98:3, 160:21, 177:2 借口 104:3, 122:8, 98:4, 101:9, 家庭 114:22, 130:3, 130:5, 130:11, 129:21, 129:24 66:18, 67:3, 133:17, 133:18, 144:2, 151:22, 每个人 77:7, 78:19, 133:19 152:2, 153:2, 55:22, 55:24 86:15, 86:21, 执行 163:13, 163:25, 每个人 87:4, 87:14, 14:4, 24:3 164:4, 166:8, 57:20 101:8, 101:12, 证物 166:10, 167:7, 114:7, 131:6, 一切 173:10 18:21, 18:23, 182:11 65:10, 66:11, 19:2, 19:8。F 家庭的 184:9 22:11, 22:14, 捏造的 108:21, 131:8 证据 32:20, 33:14, 66:1, 111:15, 96:15, 113:4, 远 106:20, 106:22, 132:25, 133:6 57:13, 83:14, 113:18, 114:23, 112:20, 112:24, 面对 105:20, 161:7 144:16, 146:16, 120:25, 121:2, 132:4, 156:23,\n\n案件 22:5007:30 - DoO5I6231KP，于 3/119/2254 提交，已录入 O301133221137569164，共 92 页\n\n致命的 50:13, 50:19, 冗长辩论 120:19, 176:20\n\n113:8 67:21,\n67:14, 134:24 第一\n理解 67:24,\n74:9, 冗长辩论 26:2, 36:21,\n151:6 74:20, 74:23, 109:21, 109:22, 55:16, 80:3,\n恐惧 75:3, 75:6, 134:23, 136:19 94:17, 101:3,\n108:23, 131:7, 75:18, 76:1, 提交 109:14, 124:3,\n131:15, 132:16, 76:14, 76:24, 4:6, 168:22 124:8, 124:23,\n150:7 79:17,\n90:3, 提交文件 125:2, 152:6,\n二月 90:11, 90:19, 39:8 153:6, 169:3,\n154:18, 163:10 91:6, 118:7, 填充 172:6, 188:20,\n联邦 118:13, 119:10, 66:14 189:5\n12:18, 38:22, 119:15, 119:25, 肮脏的 财政\n43:21,\n40:10, 120:10, 120:16, 134:9 42:11\n44:10, 67:10 130:10, 153:4, 金融 适合\n联邦地 159:17, 159:22, 120:13 28:10\n9:18 161:22, 162:1, 财务的 五\n费用 162:3, 162:23, 43:18 7:21,\n14:11,\n36:12, 48:1, 163:5, 169:17, 融资 15:17, 40:23,\n48:5, 49:4, 171:15, 171:25, 175:21 41:25, 157:4,\n51:16 180:10, 181:12, 找到 157:14\n感觉 184:5, 185:9, 56:8, 58:17, 五分钟\n86:11,\n86:19, 185:18, 187:4 62:20, 78:12, 102:6\n88:11, 180:1 五十九 85:6, 101:2, 修复\n感觉 170:11 116:22, 116:23, 71:1\n86:18 计算出 117:17, 140:24, 楼层\n女性 141:12 145:22, 160:7, 22:3, 180:10\n158:14, 158:23, 文件 177:19, 177:21, 各位\n159:1 40:10, 42:25, 179:2, 179:20 180:15\n少数 43:3, 44:4, 发现 跟随\n105:14, 105:20 174:21 79:19 136:14\n第五 已提交 好 如下\n12:9, 12:21, 15:24, 16:2, 102:1, 117:15, 6:4\n13:10, 24:21, 16:21, 17:17, 154:11, 164:20 强迫\n27:18, 27:24, 17:19, 17:23, 完成 4:17\n28:13, 28:23, 43:23, 102:4, 95:20, 109:11, 法证\n29:2, 29:8, 106:3, 107:1, 127:16, 133:22, 102:17\n30:5, 30:20, 107:5, 107:22, 133:23 表格\n31:4,\n31:13, 121:21, 123:3, 火灾 4:10,\n8:23,\n37:9,\n38:3, 154:17, 163:10, 99:18 9:17,\n9:23,\n38:16, 39:22, 163:11, 163:23,\n167:6, 168:12, 公司 10:4, 14:13,\n40:5, 40:19, 168:17, 168:24, 37:14, 37:18, 18:2,\n18:7,\n41:7, 41:17, 169:7, 169:9, 37:24, 43:16, 23:12, 23:23,\n42:4, 42:14, 169:11, 169:19, 43:18, 47:5, 24:8, 25:12,\n44:13, 45:2, 171:21, 172:13, 47:15, 48:1, 25:16, 26:22,\n45:12, 45:25, 172:20, 174:13, 49:5, 49:8, 27:8, 27:14,\n46:11, 46:21, 178:9, 181:5 49:10, 56:2, 27:20, 29:6,\n48:12, 49:17, 文件 101:17, 101:21, 29:14, 32:22,\n50:6, 50:11, 38:22 102:3, 107:11, 33:25, 34:3,\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录，于 2021 年 4 月 1 日进行\n\n案件 22:5007:20-DoO516231KP，于 03/119/2254 提交，已录入 003113722113:569865，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录，于 2021 年 4 月 1 日进行\n\n34:17, 43:13, 完全地 一般地\n\n44:5, 48:23, 四 122:2 19:17, 19:21\n49:2, 56:9, 14:16, 147:8, 功能 生成\n56:13, 56:20, 154:17, 163:10, 104:25, 129:7 49:25\n57:24,\n64:10, 167:6, 168:9, 基金 先生\n66:14,\n80:6, 169:6, 169:9, 57:5 173:16\n87:15,\n92:4, 169:11 基本的 Georgetown（乔治城）\n104:9, 104:21, 框架 71:21, 137:3 3:13\n107:15, 112:21, 112:17 资助 Geteer\n115:23, 119:19, 坦率的 56:23, 56:25 58:7,\n58:11,\n129:4, 129:18, 170:22 资金 58:22,\n58:12,\n138:1, 139:5, 欺诈 51:2, 176:23 97:21, 101:1,\n139:15, 139:18, 41:3,\n45:9, 有趣的 150:3\n140:18, 142:17, 45:21, 73:24, 39:17 获得\n143:18, 144:13, 74:1, 74:3, 进一步 51:2,\n53:13,\n145:24, 150:24, 74:12 4:8,\n4:13, 72:8,\n72:23,\n154:19, 155:8, 欺诈性的 11:4,\n90:6, 78:11, 126:23,\n156:7, 156:18, 免费 礼物\n158:15, 160:11, 16:12, 122:9, g-e-t 93:2\n160:12, 161:4, 144:4, 152:4, 59:3 赠送\n172:23, 173:21, 163:17, 164:6, g-e-t-e-e-r 182:4\n173:22, 175:25, 180:3, 180:4,\n180:19, 180:20, 165:6, 166:9, 58:21, 58:23 礼物\n186:6 168:3, 173:13 g-u-o 92:22\n正式的 自由 8:21, 9:7, 女朋友\n83:6 92:14, 92:24, 16:3, 17:12, 81:8\n正式地 94:21, 109:4 18:5 女孩\n5:3 冰冻 帮派 54:23\n组成 159:25 91:18,\n92:12, 给予\n163:25 朋友 92:19,\n93:3, 15:6,\n5:15,\n向前 87:5, 87:21 113:11, 182:2 43:2,\n62:6,\n54:21, 55:2, 朋友们 量度 68:20, 123:15,\n93:24, 144:21, 54:25, 86:15, 149:12 134:20, 139:13,\n157:23, 183:23, 86:21,\n87:14\n前面 测量 139:17, 140:25,\n190:12 150:13 142:12, 142:15,\n转发 53:1, 105:17,\n123:10, 123:16, 给予了 155:1, 177:23,\n178:1\n86:1, 111:4, 123:18, 128:12, 14:10, 70:1, 给定\n111:11, 111:15, 128:16 115:25, 116:2, 9:12, 9:15,\n112:14, 113:6, 冻结 140:22, 141:6, 11:22, 14:25,\n153:22 160:19 178:2, 183:14 93:1, 93:16,\n已转发 逃犯 Gavenman 的 115:5, 181:16,\n133:25, 134:2 160:18 51:16, 51:18, 190:14\n发现 完整的 158:6 给予\n127:6, 177:13, 101:8, 112:15, 一般的 136:11\n177:15, 177:18, 131:1, 131:17, 7:1, 26:12, 给予\n180:6 132:17, 132:21, 26:15, 141:9, 96:21,\n97:2,\n基础 159:4 142:10 136:16, 136:22\n104:22, 107:16,\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案件 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK，于 03/11/02/2012022113:56:18 提交，6 岁，第 66 页，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录\n于 2021 年 4 月 1 日进行\n\n玻璃 164:24, 182:21, 58:11, 58:22 185:6, 185:8, 76:6 187:1, 187:2 保证 185:14, 185:17, 已离开 117:6 185:21, 186:1, 去 117:3, 186:11 88:18 猜测 11:3, 17:5, 51:18, 7:12, Guo 的 好的 54:7, 66:12, 54:13, 58:21, 6:7, 6:8, 157:22 12:19, 22:15, 117:20, 24:18, 30:3, 63:16, 72:4, 117:22, 客人 79:8, 79:9, 131:1, 131:21, 81:19, 81:20, 30:18, 31:2, 132:21, 37:7, 31:11, 79:11, 83:16, 146:15, 81:25 84:6, 85:16, 147:2, 153:21, 38:1, 38:14。Guo（郭）40:3, 41:5, 85:25, 88:3, 159:6, 166:4, 1:7, 8:3, 12:8, 42:2, 44:25, 88:25, 89:1, 167:19 12:20, 14:19, 90:6, 45:10, 45:23, 89:4, Google（谷歌）22:18, 22:25, 46:9, 48:10, 93:10, 101:24, 136:2 23:7, 24:19, 118:18, 118:21, 说闲话 49:15, 50:4, 30:3, 30:19, 67:13, 76:12, 122:20, 123:20, 135:4 31:3, 31:12, 124:20, 127:1, 90:1, 118:5, 得到 37:7, 38:1, 135:22, 121:18, 122:25, 144:11, 38:14, 40:4, 62:14 124:1, 124:22, 145:22, 148:17, 政府 40:18, 41:5, 185:16, 188:8, 154:8, 154:16, 42:13, 44:12, 12:18, 9:18, 188:15, 160:13, 166:24, 188:13, 44:20, 45:1, 12:25, 44:10, 185:5 188:17, 189:3 185:4, 45:11, 45:23, 44:17, 67:11。目标 69:17, 74:5, 46:10, 46:20, 118:19 82:23, 83:4 93:9, 48:11, 49:16, 92:20, 上帝 50:5, 67:13, H 93:16, 94:1, 154:22 70:22, 72:20, 94:13, 110:19, h-a-o-y-u-n 去 133:2, 133:5。73:4, 74:8, 11:22 74:11, 75:17, 166:23 133:6, 133:9, h-a-y-u-n 75:25, 76:13, 正在去 150:6 11:18 76:23, 80:10, 7:3, 10:13, 州长 91:5, 90:2, 10:16, 10:18, 186:16 h-o-w-a-n 8:14, 9:22, 25:4, 96:4, 102:9, 22:7, 大陪审团 11:16, 11:12, 106:25, 107:19, 26:22, 26:21, 14:1 11:20, 16:4 107:24, 118:5, 28:15, 44:18, 伟大的 ha 119:9, 119:14, 53:22, 61:8, 87:8, 88:10, 8:4, 14:20 62:4, 68:22, 119:24, 120:9, 131:7, 154:2, 黑客 120:15, 121:5, 69:19, 74:14, 161:9, 165:19 97:18 74:16, 123:2, 134:5, 75:2, 杂货 被黑客攻击 159:15, 159:21, 79:23, 86:1, 76:8, 76:11 59:21, 59:22, 160:18, 161:21, 86:3, 87:12, 理由 59:23, 59:24, 90:6, 161:24, 162:22, 93:13, 13:10, 13:9, 97:6, 97:22, 163:4, 167:3, 106:5, 106:6, 68:4 98:2, 99:1。169:16, 171:14, 109:16, 109:17, 团体 99:6, 99:16, 171:24, 178:11, 134:7, 134:10, 52:13 3:3, 99:17, 100:2, 180:9, 181:11, 134:11, 134:19, 增长 100:7, 100:9, 183:12, 184:3, 148:19, 149:6, 42:3 102:11 184:15, 184:16, 149:8, 154:3, GTV 184:24, 185:1, 154:12, 154:14, 21:7, 58:7。100:10\n\n案件 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZ31KP，于 3/119/02/113722113:56:167 提交，第 67 页，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录\n于 2021 年 4 月 1 日进行\nHostetler\n\n海通和谐 93:23 随附于此 160:1, 160:25 仇恨 190:21 47:6, 47:25\n\n希金博瑟姆 161:19, 162:2 酒店\n\n神圣的 159:4 78:4 53:9, 81:2, 157:18 HBO 最高的 91:21, 93:18\n\n哈姆雷特 98:21, 99:23 89:19 129:23, 130:14\n\n韩 91:21 头部 87:10, 93:12, 91:19 他自己 101:9, 108:16, 170:10 小时 182:20\n\n手 59:5, 131:10, 8:9, 133:9, 190:21 听到 135:18, 146:19, 6:19, 153:18 何万 1:12, 2:8, 6:1, 8:7, 9:22 雇用 101:16, 102:3, 139:21, 154:11, 160:7, 164:24 小时 62:12, 154:13, 8:13, 8:17\n\n递交 112:3, 138:13, 140:19, 140:21, 177:15, 177:17, 178:4 雇用的 160:2, 187:9, 155:20, 156:5, 190:10 然而 156:11, 92:18, 100:24, 106:7, 107:20, 140:1, 173:3, 174:14\n\n处理 11:17, 143:1, 96:19, 179:25 击中 169:3 何 151:12, 152:8 人类 93:21\n\n手 53:10, 59:14, 178:21 持有 2:8, 89:22, 90:10, 90:24 持有 58:16, 60:13, 88:15, 93:12, 167:20 百 86:4, 134:22, 155:2 104:10, 115:5, 158:3, 158:7\n\n悬挂 39:16, 86:5, 99:13, 154:7 帮助 93:12 持有 59:4, 179:7 数百 93:7, 93:16, 104:13, 134:3\n\n发生 166:12, 166:13 帮助过 105:7 霍尔特斯 101:18 伤害 78:16\n\n发生了 28:2, 59:20, 99:4, 179:17, 184:9 帮助 78:15 此处 19:6, 21:25, 60:8, 22:6, 13:11, 61:25, 100:10 家 60:17, 60:19, 60:21, 28:11, 50:12, 58:19, 77:7, 79:18, 83:16 伤害 78:6, 61:9\n\n正在发生 22:5 国土 10:6 T 身份证明 105:11\n\n高兴 7:13, 84:9, 99:19, 85:25 香港 107:24, 118:16, 164:25, 165:19, 96:16, 96:25, 97:1, 97:15, 149:14, 159:25, 160:19 想法 9:11, 9:13, 166:4, 166:18, 168:15, 169:12\n\n骚扰 144:7, 147:3, 62:9, 83:19, 84:8, 84:12, 126:24, 136:3 148:2, 150:17, 154:15, 156:23, 157:20, 179:23 身份证明 9:17, 9:21, 9:24, 10:5\n\n骚扰行为 88:19 179:24, 184:1, 184:4 流氓 77:19, 78:21, 10:22, 19:3, 22:17, 106:23\n\n伤害 78:17, 101:11, 146:25, 149:5, 149:10, 149:13, 151:1, 153:11 特此 4:3, 4:7, 190:9 胡珀 121:3, 121:19, 123:1, 124:4, 124:25\n\n损害 190:11 本文中 3:19, 18:15, 4:5 希望 39:10, 39:13, 42:24 识别 108:7\n\n案件 22-50073，文件 102-1，提交日期 03/19/22，登记日期 03/19/22 13:56:36，第 68 页，共 92 页\n\n案件 22-50073，文件提交日期 03/11/2020 11:56:18，登记日期 08/12/2022 13:56:18，第 69 页，共 92 页\n\nHo Wan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n询问书 118:6, 118:12, 119:15, 119:10, 120:10, 120:16, 120:23, 123:21, 124:24, 125:2, 130:9, 136:14, 162:15, 167:19, 170:14, 170:17, 171:2, 179:10, 179:14, 179:25, 189:6\n\n判决书 30:13, 30:11, 30:17, 52:6, 52:7, 52:10, 61:17, 69:25, 86:7, 98:22, 98:23, 118:9, 156:23, 159:16, 159:22, 161:22, 162:23, 163:5, 169:17, 171:4, 171:8, 171:15, 171:25, 175:22, 176:15, 181:9, 181:12, 184:5, 185:9, 185:18\n\n杰夫 12:23, 28:11, 34:10, 42:16, 50:8, 50:17, 71:8, 140:8, 171:4, 171:8 朱丽叶 156:24, 156:25 涉及 98:24, 100:4, 100:6, 123:21, 130:16, 167:17\n\n杰弗里 53:22 已接受访谈 95:2, 98:22 七月 101:6 涉及 37:1, 3:15 新泽西 94:24 访谈 15:15, 15:18, 123:21 跳跃 78:14, 182:9\n\n访谈 2:11, 168:12, 190:2, 190:9 国际大学联盟 116:12 iPhone 152:7 简 105:9, 105:12 介绍 91:19 六月 185:25, 186:10 建斌 92:8, 99:25, 153:24 讽刺 151:13\n\n调查 101:6, 108:14 习近平 41:2, 41:14 无关紧要的 110:1 援引 27:3, 77:21, 108:3, 182:15 垃圾 84:14, 87:3\n\n工作 79:17, 162:1, 1:17, 89:22, 89:25, 90:10, 90:24, 115:22, 115:24, 115:25, 117:15, 117:17, 117:20 陪审团 180:3 援引 14:1, 121:2, 121:6, 188:12 不负责任的 67:20, 90:11, 116:2 正义 34:24, 39:21 不负责任地 45:21, 78:4, 27:3\n\n援引 131:14, 132:25, 150:15, 150:16 争议 117:22, 134:7, 135:14, 150:1 12:9, 12:21, 24:20, 30:4, 30:20, 31:4, 31:13, 37:8, 38:2, 38:15, 40:5, 40:19, 41:6, 41:16, 42:4, 42:14, 44:13, 45:2, 45:12, 45:24, 46:11, 46:21, 48:12, 49:17, 50:6, 50:19, 50:12, 50:14, 52:6, 67:14, 74:9, 74:23, 75:6, 75:18, 76:1, 76:14, 76:24, 79:15, 79:19, 86:23, 87:19, 88:14, 88:16, 88:22, 88:25, 90:3, 91:6, 93:20, 99:19, 108:17, 111:7, 127:4, 128:3, 129:20, 130:1, 148:19, 150:5, 150:6, 151:12, 152:6, 152:8, 157:19, 157:22, 164:12, 164:15, 169:8, 187:3\n\n工作 71:1, 81:22 已发布 150:10, 150:21 K-W-O-K 9:18, 10:1, 10:5, 11:12, 11:16, 16:4, 17:13, 18:1 加入 8:12, 8:14, 9:7, 11:10, 52:6, 79:9 笑话 11:22, 41:6, 111:7 争议事项 157:19, 127:4, 187:3\n\n乔利 44:13, 45:2 保留 46:11, 164:12, 164:15 其本身 101:17 乔纳森 46:21, 129:20, 130:1, 148:19, 150:5, 150:6, 157:22, 169:8\n\nJ\n\n贾诺弗 43:16, 74:9, 74:23, 75:6, 75:18, 76:1, 76:14, 76:24, 79:15, 79:19, 86:23, 87:19, 88:14, 88:16, 88:22, 88:25 法官 79:19, 108:17, 128:3, 135:2, 149:14 已保留 93:20\n\n日本 76:14, 76:24, 88:14, 88:16, 88:22, 88:25 杰伊 90:3, 91:6\n\nPLANET DEPOS（普莱尼特证词服务公司） 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案件 22-50073，文件提交日期 03/11/02/22/2113:56:16，第 70 页，共 92 页\n\n绑架 12:12, 13:8, 13:19, 16:6, 16:2, 18:9, 18:13, 19:5, 19:11, 43:8, 47:9, 47:12, 50:21, 66:10, 75:11, 78:6, 89:10, 108:2, 113:6, 113:9, 127:23, 131:1, 132:19, 158:22, 159:1, 159:7, 159:9, 159:13, 163:22, 167:5, 176:17, 177:12, 177:16, 177:17, 177:24, 178:1, 180:10, 187:9, 188:3, 190:10\n\n杀手 18:9, 18:13, 19:5, 47:9, 47:12, 132:19 杀手们 66:10, 75:11, 108:2 种类 130:7, 160:2, 170:14, 175:9, 175:13, 175:16, 178:9, 183:10\n\n学习 21:15, 34:23, 53:24, 54:14, 55:7, 59:7, 64:10, 86:25, 87:1, 88:11, 93:21, 94:2, 96:1, 97:8, 130:22, 150:14, 166:6, 167:17, 174:13, 175:9, 175:13, 175:16, 178:9, 183:10\n\n至少 14:11, 35:21, 64:10, 86:25, 87:1, 88:11, 93:21, 94:2, 96:1, 97:8, 130:22, 150:14, 166:6, 174:13 诉讼 28:22, 53:21, 78:19, 82:18, 130:22, 150:14, 166:6, 170:10\n\nL\n\n湖 82:18 律师 6:24, 16:18, 17:15, 17:22, 25:10, 25:11, 26:11, 28:11, 34:21, 36:4, 36:9, 36:13, 51:15, 53:15, 54:11, 55:10, 55:25, 56:17, 59:16, 61:2, 93:18, 94:5, 96:21, 117:10, 117:14, 130:14, 133:13, 134:16, 134:18, 136:3, 144:16, 146:4, 146:24, 149:12, 150:2, 150:11, 150:13, 167:9, 173:11\n\n语言 6:21, 17:15 离开 108:23, 128:18, 131:15, 131:20, 133:13, 134:16, 134:18, 136:3, 144:16, 146:4, 146:24, 149:12, 150:2, 150:11, 150:13, 167:9, 173:11\n\n大型的 34:21, 36:4, 96:21 法律的 3:3, 3:6, 52:13, 54:11, 55:10, 55:25, 56:17, 93:18, 117:10, 117:14, 130:14, 149:12, 150:2, 150:11, 150:13, 167:9, 173:11\n\n拉斯 36:9, 36:13, 146:24 最后 59:21, 64:18, 65:4, 65:6, 78:21, 96:19 让我们 18:22, 62:10, 71:20, 97:11, 97:13, 102:2, 110:2, 113:23, 116:9, 117:15, 117:16, 117:20, 117:21, 120:23, 121:13, 122:20, 123:20, 124:20, 127:1, 140:19, 140:22, 140:25, 141:6, 141:8, 141:11, 142:13, 142:16, 146:13, 155:3\n\n善意 8:9, 8:13, 8:17, 14:5, 15:14, 15:17, 18:12, 29:1, 29:5, 29:9, 40:23, 41:25, 46:16, 67:9, 70:22, 73:16, 89:4, 97:11, 97:13, 102:2, 110:2, 113:23, 116:9, 117:15, 117:16, 117:20, 117:21, 120:23, 121:13, 122:20, 123:20, 124:20, 127:1, 140:19, 140:22, 140:25, 141:6, 141:8, 141:11, 142:13, 142:16, 146:13, 155:3\n\n明知地 89:4, 102:2, 120:23 知情 19:6, 41:3, 57:19, 71:2, 89:7, 89:22, 89:24, 90:10, 113:8, 125:22, 126:5, 126:15, 127:8, 127:22, 135:13, 138:15, 141:6, 141:8, 141:11, 142:13, 142:16, 152:7, 152:21, 155:6, 155:7, 155:17, 156:12, 156:14, 157:21, 163:9, 169:10, 170:21, 170:22, 175:20\n\n致命的 113:8 信件 44:16, 56:5, 88:14, 127:22, 138:15, 152:7, 152:21, 155:17, 156:12, 169:10, 170:21, 170:22 之后 94:19, 99:15, 145:9, 145:12, 156:14, 157:21, 165:20, 165:21, 166:24, 166:25, 167:2, 174:1, 175:20, 178:2\n\n知道 53:19, 54:2, 54:3, 54:9, 71:6 法律 33:18, 47:5, 47:15, 47:25, 49:5, 49:8, 49:10, 51:9, 56:2, 61:2, 61:3, 64:24, 66:22, 71:9, 71:12, 71:15, 91:19, 96:16, 96:25, 97:1, 97:15, 101:17, 102:3, 107:11, 117:22, 127:25, 128:4, 149:14, 153:14, 155:20, 156:13, 156:15, 156:21, 159:25, 160:19\n\n香港 33:18, 47:5, 47:15, 47:25, 89:19 律师 33:23, 34:2, 49:5, 49:8, 49:10, 51:9, 56:2, 64:24, 66:22, 71:9, 96:16, 96:25, 97:1, 97:15, 117:22, 127:25, 149:14, 153:14, 159:25, 160:19\n\n层级 9:11, 9:13, 89:19 李 91:19 连 101:17, 102:3, 155:20, 156:13 郭文贵 1:12, 2:8, 6:1, 6:7, 8:7, 8:18, 8:19, 11:7, 120:19, 151:14, 152:16, 157:1, 158:3 梁 107:11, 156:15, 156:21 诉讼 108:19, 109:5\n\nHo Wan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录，于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案件 22-50073，文件提交日期 03/19/22，登记日期 03/19/22 13:56:16，第 71 页，共 92 页\n\n110:8, 144:20 88:23, 89:4 丢失 112:6\n\n许可证 103:9, 118:1, 118:24, 120:13 女士 10:1 失去 115:24 制作 141:17\n\n代替 120:20 少量的 5:2 失去的 115:22 制作了 39:7, 40:13, 51:6, 57:9, 58:4, 64:21, 77:22, 87:14, 87:24, 88:1, 88:2, 92:8, 95:24, 97:20, 101:7, 113:8, 113:12, 113:17, 113:19, 114:13, 127:25, 130:18, 132:17, 135:1, 135:5, 145:16, 146:22, 146:23, 149:4, 149:16, 149:23, 150:2, 150:7, 150:8, 150:11, 163:18, 164:19, 171:21, 178:17, 178:25, 179:23, 181:3\n\n生命 99:22, 168:11 居住 113:9, 113:21, 113:23, 153:25 许多 85:14, 77:6, 77:10, 80:5, 80:12, 81:15, 82:3, 87:6, 87:10, 92:1, 92:15, 92:15, 94:23, 98:21, 100:25, 101:12, 111:4, 113:3, 113:12, 113:17, 113:19, 114:13, 127:25, 130:18, 132:17, 135:1, 135:5, 145:16, 146:22, 146:23, 149:4, 149:16, 149:23, 150:2, 150:7, 150:8, 150:11, 163:18, 164:19, 171:21, 178:17, 178:25, 179:23, 181:3\n\n光 129:11, 129:13, 157:19 居住过 100:25, 113:3 有限的 81:12, 81:18, 130:16 生命 77:11 居住 18:11, 88:20, 108:22 许多 57:16, 58:1, 66:1\n\n有限责任公司 3:11 大厅 54:23 响亮的 154:10 魔法 143:23\n\n线路 22:16, 22:19, 10:14, 79:10, 84:9, 86:17, 88:5, 88:8, 88:12, 88:18, 88:24, 95:9, 96:1 当地的 114:2, 114:4, 188:10 低的 182:13 邮件 52:13, 52:16, 52:18, 52:19, 53:8, 53:13, 55:15, 55:19, 88:5, 88:8, 88:12, 88:18, 88:24, 95:9, 96:1, 180:9, 180:13, 180:16\n\n洛根 1:4, 6:10, 15:22, 124:2, 124:23, 188:19, 189:5 路德 91:17, 93:11, 94:3, 94:6, 94:16, 94:18, 94:20, 95:10, 96:3, 96:11, 110:6, 113:10, 114:11, 115:9, 115:22, 115:24, 115:25, 116:7, 116:16, 116:17, 130:14, 145:2, 177:1, 177:6, 177:8 已邮寄 179:13\n\n行 165:23 长的 107:25, 138:7, 114:11, 115:9 邮件 52:24, 53:3\n\n链接 149:7, 149:8, 43:2, 64:17, 65:13, 65:15, 65:17 最长的 90:25 中国大陆 9:10, 96:20, 96:24, 97:10, 111:12, 115:2, 134:1, 145:1, 150:2\n\n列表 55:14, 57:8 看 111:19, 130:14, 143:11, 143:14, 143:16, 143:22, 144:8, 144:11, 156:24, 168:7 荒谬的 157:24 制作 6:19, 6:24, 8:10, 21:22, 34:22, 35:16, 36:25, 54:8, 70:25, 86:5, 88:14, 92:10, 93:10, 93:20, 111:18, 111:24\n\n列出的 57:14 听 138:7 看过 168:6\n\n字面地 65:7, 65:13 M 马 110:25, 111:2 寻找 60:23, 61:20, 111:10, 111:12, 111:24, 111:25, 160:14\n\n诉讼 28:5, 49:6, 80:17, 82:14\n\n案件 22-50073，文件 102-1，提交日期 03/19/22，登记日期 03/19/22 13:56:36，第 72 页，共 92 页\n\n案件 22-50073，文件提交日期 03/11/09/22/2113:56:16，第 73 页，共 92 页\n\n英里 118:11 米切尔 6:9, 13:8, 18:9, 35:6, 36:2, 36:7, 36:11 动机 8:7, 8:10, 79:8, 180:10 姓名 8:13, 8:15, 8:17, 8:21, 9:4, 9:6, 9:12, 9:14, 9:15, 11:10, 11:15, 11:22, 16:3, 16:17, 18:24, 22:9, 35:21, 43:2, 59:5, 62:10, 79:24, 79:25, 88:23, 92:22, 96:17, 108:24, 115:4, 115:5, 118:19, 132:13, 138:2, 138:17, 147:21, 149:11, 151:13, 151:14, 151:15, 151:16, 151:17, 152:6, 152:13, 152:15, 152:16, 152:17, 152:21, 152:22, 152:24, 157:12, 157:15, 160:1, 160:25, 167:22, 173:17, 184:22\n\n茅台 155:16, 155:21 百万 92:22, 115:4, 115:5 莫 9:6, 9:12, 9:14, 9:15, 11:10, 11:15, 11:22 移动 132:13, 151:13, 187:13\n\n片刻 79:25, 88:23, 108:24, 138:2, 138:17, 147:21, 149:11, 149:17, 152:24, 157:12, 157:15, 160:1, 160:25, 173:17, 184:22 已移动 29:13, 34:9, 34:20, 34:24, 35:22, 36:21, 47:7, 48:20, 49:3, 49:7, 57:21, 58:11, 58:17, 58:22, 60:5, 61:21, 79:10, 93:1, 93:7, 93:17, 104:18, 104:25, 105:1, 106:12, 115:18, 125:4, 127:3, 134:2, 134:3, 146:18, 146:25, 150:14, 150:22, 151:1, 152:6, 152:21, 157:15, 160:1, 160:25, 173:17, 179:8, 183:10, 184:2, 185:4, 185:14\n\n暂时地 79:10 正在移动 106:12, 125:4, 127:3 数百万 47:7, 48:20, 49:3, 49:7, 57:21, 58:11, 58:17, 58:22, 60:5, 61:21, 93:1, 93:7, 93:17, 104:18, 104:25, 105:1, 115:18, 134:2, 134:3, 146:18, 146:25, 150:14, 150:22, 179:8, 183:10, 184:2, 185:4, 185:14\n\n金钱 49:3, 115:18, 179:8, 184:2, 185:4, 185:14 MSN 93:17 蒙古 91:18, 97:13, 130:19 很多 93:5, 97:15, 138:14, 150:22, 182:5\n\n蒙古的 12:6, 42:9, 73:14, 100:20, 101:11, 101:24, 104:16, 115:2, 116:4, 116:10, 116:11, 119:12, 119:22, 128:14, 128:16, 130:15, 131:8, 132:12, 132:15, 132:16, 137:21, 139:20, 152:6, 152:21, 156:19, 170:20, 170:24, 172:7, 176:8\n\n心智 93:9, 95:5, 100:20, 101:11, 101:24, 104:16, 115:2, 116:10, 116:11, 119:12, 119:22, 128:14, 128:16, 130:15, 131:8, 139:20, 156:19, 170:20, 170:24, 172:7, 176:8 款项 132:12, 132:15, 132:16, 137:21 名为 23:8, 35:6, 36:6, 36:9, 36:13, 36:16 我的 22:5\n\n月份 149:19, 151:1, 153:21, 154:4, 182:20, 185:14, 187:5 部长 99:24, 107:21, 182:20 必须 111:25, 178:11\n\n月份 43:16, 47:5, 48:17, 115:22, 122:10, 125:7, 138:11 部 99:24, 107:21, 182:20 更多 101:19, 109:24, 116:6, 122:10, 125:7, 138:11 姓名 7:21, 20:12, 34:4, 34:15, 47:8, 58:1, 62:13, 72:9, 72:13, 80:9, 101:20, 101:21, 101:22, 102:17, 104:16, 114:16, 116:18, 116:20, 116:21, 153:18, 170:11\n\n轻微的 131:2 分钟 71:20, 172:6 静音 21:13, 21:14, 79:9 我自己 157:4, 157:6, 157:8, 157:10, 158:2\n\n歪曲 85:17 错过 53:5 早晨 101:7, 103:3, 129:12, 131:5, 156:10, 163:18 麻醉品 6:7, 6:8, 21:8, 58:5, 65:7\n\n错误 34:23, 100:1, 129:12, 131:5 狭窄的 144:6, 144:8, 156:10, 163:18 误认为 161:14 国家 33:1, 34:19, 55:12, 84:15, 109:20, 173:24 大多数 55:12 N\n\n弄错 6:21, 84:15, 109:20, 184:20 国家的 34:24 N-U-O 57:15 主要是 170:21 误解 140:14 107:23\n\nHo Wan Kwok（郭文贵）证词记录，于 April 1, 2021 进行\n\n案件 22-50073，文件提交日期 03/11/02/2012022113:56:16，第 74 页，共 92 页\n\n本地人 17:1, 17:2, 55:25, 56:2，通知 6:20 17:16, 17:23, 56:22, 56:25, 17:25, 19:2，天然的 18:6, 30:11, 59:25, 63:19, 19:7, 111:6, 48:22, 31:20, 67:11, 72:1, 34:11 188:7 49:5, 49:11, 74:6, 113:23，自然地 52:7, 52:10, 120:2, 120:5, 99:23, 171:21，11月 110:11 80:18, 80:22, 120:13, 155:24，几乎，如今 88:23, 89:4, 162:5, 168:12, 55:4 59:22, 98:4 102:4, 102:20, 169:25, 172:21，必然地，号码 103:20, 106:2, 174:17, 174:21, 57:15, 10:16, 55:17 6:16, 107:2, 107:10, 175:1, 176:2，需要 62:1, 62:7, 114:13, 118:1, 180:10, 180:11, 62:25, 78:2, 7:3, 7:6, 118:24, 120:5, 190:2, 190:8, 91:16, 104:24, 13:14, 19:12, 120:19, 131:1, 190:9 120:24, 124:20, 19:23, 25:7, 145:13, 146:15，报纸 160:10, 171:8, 53:17, 55:19, 176:15 92:1 188:6, 189:2 58:20, 58:21，内华达州的，下一个，编号的 59:25, 61:13, 113:6 135:10 74:1, 90:13, 124:11，从不，好的 98:4, 109:14，数字 33:2, 51:12, 134:16 22:25 112:11, 112:22, 65:24, 66:3，九 112:23, 113:3，NV 73:25, 74:12, 21:13, 21:14, 113:15, 118:17, 3:6 102:12, 111:12, 81:17 118:20, 135:22，O 136:25, 137:2, 111:13, 111:18，点头，好 111:21, 133:3, 137:16, 7:4 144:23, 8:14 134:19, 134:11，无 146:9, 146:12，宣誓 142:9, 157:21, 149:7, 151:19, 112:19 4:16 175:23 154:8, 159:7，尽管如此，异议，新的 167:17, 173:25, 7:2 5:8, 26:21, 1:2, 2:11，非律师 60:18, 62:4, 6:12, 10:2，需要 56:18 90:13, 160:11, 23:24, 24:14, 54:12, 110:13，未作答 175:25 25:10, 25:24, 110:18 137:8, 138:3，提出异议 30:14, 30:16，需要 180:7, 184:22 127:2 31:1, 31:10, 50:20, 51:6，正常的，异议 32:8, 32:12, 143:5 20:10 8:23, 10:10, 33:20, 38:9，谈判，公证 10:25, 14:13, 38:12, 38:22, 180:22 33:17 18:2, 18:7, 39:4, 39:1，净额，经公证的 23:12, 23:23, 39:11, 39:7, 163:2 178:6 24:8, 25:12, 39:14, 39:18，荷兰，公证人 25:16, 27:8, 39:24, 40:1, 22:2 33:20, 2:10, 27:14, 27:20, 40:14, 40:25，网络 190:7 29:14, 29:6, 43:20, 44:9, 101:1，注释 32:22, 33:25, 45:8, 46:8，神经科医师 58:20, 123:2 34:3, 34:17, 46:17, 49:22, 126:19，注意到 35:16, 41:8, 49:24, 50:3，内华达州 179:12, 187:6 43:13, 44:5, 50:23, 51:1. 15:25, 16:25，无事 58:20, 103:17\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012 12:56:18 6 5 of 92\n\n45:15, 46:2，10月 39:16, 42:23, 134:14, 143:5, 48:23, 49:1, 91:12 43:1, 43:2, 143:6, 144:23, 56:9, 56:12，办公室 59:11, 61:21, 146:16, 147:3, 56:20, 66:2, 78:2, 150:4, 151:4, 57:24, 32:11, 32:14, 69:6, 70:17, 82:6, 90:8, 172:14 32:16, 59:15, 71:1, 72:17, 90:9, 96:25，开放 59:17 73:7, 73:19, 100:20, 102:16, 98:11，官员 113:24, 80:6, 92:4, 4:15, 105:4, 106:18, 118:19, 146:12, 31:9, 103:10, 104:9, 113:10, 122:15, 149:23, 154:8 39:13, 39:23. 104:21, 107:15, 128:11, 131:22, 176:12，已开放 115:23, 112:21, 141:6, 142:5, 110:22，官员们 144:24, 119:19, 129:18, 146:6，公开地 39:19 138:1, 139:5, 152:9, 152:24, 110:12，办公室 110:20, 139:15, 139:18, 153:15, 154:16, 32:17 135:18, 136:2, 140:18, 142:17, 156:20, 161:8, 144:22, 145:20，离岸 143:18, 144:13, 168:12, 168:13，运营 160:3, 160:4, 145:24, 168:14, 168:22, 147:7, 18:11 161:1, 161:2 147:13, 150:24, 168:25, 169:7，机会，哦 154:19, 155:8, 172:14, 174:12, 114:16 165:19 156:7, 156:18, 175:2, 184:18，反对，好，一分钟 158:15, 160:12, 33:19 9:2, 10:23, 161:4, 162:6, 21:13, 21:15 18:25, 19:22，命令 172:23, 173:21，一岁 6:21, 19:24, 35:13, 7:4, 173:22, 180:19, 34:13 127:3, 159:25, 42:24, 43:1, 180:20, 183:18，若干个 161:1, 161:6, 58:24, 61:1, 186:5 140:13, 180:16 180:7 81:11, 81:24，异议，正在进行 84:11, 86:8，已命令 4:9, 6:25, 111:22, 174:6 179:11 96:9, 97:13, 124:1, 85:23，在线，原始的 100:12, 102:6, 124:22, 170:13, 57:18, 58:2, 105:20, 106:9, 107:1 188:18, 189:4 78:11, 87:7, 114:25, 115:24，其他，义务 87:12, 88:3, 122:21, 123:20, 6:17, 14:23, 69:4, 71:11, 114:8, 116:22, 124:20, 127:9, 15:1, 20:17, 103:8 135:19, 136:2, 132:2, 144:14, 20:20, 28:14，义务 144:19, 144:23, 183:3 28:22, 29:9, 170:8 145:11, 145:12，旧的 32:17, 33:20，观察 145:18, 145:19, 3:13, 54:25 33:23, 34:2, 18:4 181:23，省略 35:9, 61:21，妨碍，仅 124:12 79:25, 80:22, 167:16 22:24, 34:11，一次 83:18, 91:18，妨碍性的 58:10, 69:7, 15:23, 98:3, 108:5. 17:5, 70:9 70:17, 71:2, 45:22, 46:1, 108:8, 112:5, 93:19，取得 81:18, 116:17, 116:18, 99:16, 91:10, 65:2 104:23, 114:1, 120:13, 128:5, 148:15 114:4，显然地 114:3，一 130:15, 155:6, 115:10, 115:13, 183:23 28:6, 155:15, 155:16, 8:6, 9:9, 9:10, 117:17, 131:2，发生 155:18, 155:20, 18:24, 22:9, 131:24, 132:1, 163:14 157:1, 158:7, 28:2, 28:6,\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/113722113:56:16 dPage 76 of 92\n\n168:5, 170:8，当事人 178:17, 178:24,\n\n172:15, 172:25, 12:4, 50:10, 181:9, 183:24\n174:13, 175:2，太平洋 53:23, 56:23，付款\n176:11, 179:25, 8:3, 14:20, 57:4, 57:9, 36:25, 39:7,\n181:2 47:11, 48:8 57:15, 65:25, 40:13, 51:4,\n其他人，页 83:5,\n82:24, 185:21, 185:24\n82:8, 82:9, 107:18, 124:6, 92:17,\n91:22，支付\n82:12 125:4, 188:2, 111:16, 115:12, 29:22, 76:18\n否则 188:6, 189:2 116:5, 131:11，高峰\n97:6, 175:22，页数 131:12, 161:15, 100:9\n外出 54:17, 142:4, 178:18\n142:12，当事人的，农民\n15:1, 33:10，已付款 108:19, 134:8,\n33:13, 56:8, 12:6, 30:14, 86:16 182:13, 182:14\n58:17,\n62:20, 37:1,\n44:15，密码，处罚\n66:14, 78:7, 47:20, 47:22, 43:5 5:7\n78:12, 78:16, 49:10,\n60:1，过去，处罚\n85:7,\n99:5, 76:6,\n89:24, 16:19,\n46:6, 125:13\n99:8,\n99:9, 118:1, 133:12, 46:15,\n78:1，待决\n108:14, 117:17, 133:13, 175:22, 82:4, 132:10, 7:8, 133:20,\n120:24, 127:7, 184:14, 184:23, 132:11, 142:18, 135:10, 137:6,\n145:20, 179:2, 184:24 150:9, 177:14 154:20, 187:3\n179:20, 181:23，文件，路径，人们\n183:25 58:20 10:19 6:16, 20:20,\n管辖权之外的\n54:8，段落，暂停 54:11,\n司法管辖区 107:18, 183:11 79:7 54:25, 56:15,\n72:4，部分，暂停 78:12, 81:3,\n结果 28:7, 31:19, 78:23 91:16, 91:18,\n190:18 54:17,\n80:3，支付 94:23,\n93:20,\n外部 147:11, 153:22, 29:20, 29:24, 95:3,\n95:1,\n32:8, 72:10, 163:25, 174:6 30:16, 36:20, 106:9, 108:4,\n144:3，特定的 37:4, 37:18, 115:13, 115:14,\n超过 8:1, 13:11, 44:9,\n40:2, 115:19, 116:12,\n6:16, 80:15, 69:3, 117:21 48:7,\n49:14, 116:15, 130:17,\n94:25, 104:10, 尤其 76:10,\n51:2, 145:1, 146:5,\n124:10, 124:14, 10:14 76:20, 118:14, 146:22,\n149:14,\n135:19, 180:23, 118:23, 119:7, 149:16, 150:8,\n186:3，各方 159:13, 176:14, 153:19, 155:18\n过于宽泛 4:5, 6:2, 55:1, 185:14，人民的\n79:20 190:16，应付 57:1\n监督，合伙人 180:25, 181:3，百分比\n93:23 93:6,\n96:24，支付 161:13, 180:1\n自己的 97:2,\n97:16, 37:21, 37:23，或许\n30:25, 58:16, 115:20, 184:17 47:23, 51:22, 43:17, 43:22,\n75:22, 86:20，合伙人 62:21, 132:22, 54:20, 101:14,\n161:17, 161:18 83:1,\n83:2, 159:18\n所有者 83:3, 149:15，付款 123:17, 131:24,\n合伙企业 36:25, 51:6, 134:3, 157:23,\n81:20, 82:1 85:11 173:5, 173:9, 159:4, 161:12,\n拥有 170:19, 172:24,\n160:24\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\nPLANET DEPOS（Planet Depos） 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\nCase 22:5001:30 - DoO5I6231KPFiled@3/119/02/129122113:56:16 7 dPage 77 of 92\n\n177:9，电话，部分，Podhaskie（波德哈斯基）\n\n期间 59:6,\n59:7, 55:15, 55:19, 23:9, 23:14,\n82:5, 90:25, 59:21,\n59:22, 99:23, 115:10, 23:18, 23:19,\n101:6, 104:15, 59:24, 59:25, 130:6 23:22, 25:2,\n138:15 60:1, 60:20, 零碎地 25:9, 25:15,\n伪证罪 61:15, 62:1, 74:18 25:22, 26:3,\n5:7, 125:13 62:2,\n62:7，地点 26:5, 26:20,\n获准 62:18, 62:22, 77:11,\n97:18, 27:6,\n27:12,\n79:21 62:25,\n63:1, 148:7,\n130:1, 27:16, 29:12,\n迫害 63:3,\n63:5, 157:18 29:18, 29:20,\n129:22 63:11,\n63:7，已放置 29:22, 29:25,\n人员 64:12, 65:20, 98:24 32:7, 33:4,\n18:10, 54:5, 84:3,\n84:21，原告 33:10, 33:16,\n59:16, 64:6, 84:24, 84:25, 1:5, 3:4, 6:10, 33:19, 33:24,\n82:6, 88:10, 85:7,\n85:13, 15:21, 124:2, 51:19\n93:4,\n93:24, 85:16, 87:18, 124:23, 171:10，Podhaskie 的\n111:7, 115:5, 89:16,\n97:5, 188:19, 189:5 32:14\n115:6, 115:10，计划，观点\n115:12, 115:22, 98:2, 60:3, 60:6 57:25,\n85:8,\n133:4, 146:3, 98:7, 平台 94:3, 100:14,\n152:10, 170:18, 98:8, 92:24,\n94:20, 100:17, 150:19,\n176:18, 176:19, 98:16, 98:18, 101:1,\n97:21, 187:3\n182:23 98:25, 99:1, 正在玩 54:10, 警察\n个人 99:6, 99:18, 100:2, 100:3, 128:17 95:5,\n93:9,\n24:19, 30:3, 100:8, 100:13, 诉状 111:16,\n111:11,\n36:24,\n42:2, 104:11, 104:14, 117:14 116:10,\n115:3,\n60:21,\n60:19, 104:16, 104:24, 诉状文件 116:15\n62:7,\n61:14, 105:3, 105:7, 117:10，警察\n62:18,\n62:21, 113:20, 128:9, 请 130:16\n91:17,\n96:13, 128:10, 144:25, 5:2, 6:19, 7:7，政治的\n97:20,\n97:25, 145:2 7:12, 18:19, 11:9\n108:13, 108:17，电话 18:24, 19:15，便携式\n109:7, 110:16, 99:9, 99:11,\n113:12, 114:9, 99:16, 19:20, 22:9, 129:13\n131:12, 132:24, 99:19,\n100:6, 100:7, 22:12, 22:23，部分\n135:2, 135:17, 102:10, 102:17, 28:19, 35:2, 120:6, 153:5,\n144:17, 145:15, 102:25, 103:2, 35:10, 57:21, 165:2, 166:5,\n146:8, 149:21, 103:5, 128:5，照片 69:23, 78:22, 167:10\n149:24, 153:3, 153:17 129:2 78:23, 79:1，摆姿势\n亲自 99:6, 99:18, 89:5, 90:20，冒充\n25:23, 53:4，医师 126:21, 127:19 96:4, 103:14, 86:12, 86:20,\n53:5, 107:19，挑选 106:19, 131:22, 87:8\n107:24, 107:25, 141:6, 142:2, 133:17, 141:18，职位\n110:7\n人员 142:5 144:1, 148:23, 94:19\n接送 152:24, 167:22，占有\n182:3 128:24，复数 177:5\n人员\n184:19 159:10，可能\n7:22, 13:4,\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\nCase 22:5007:30 - Dood30231K PFiled 03/11/02/2022113:56:16 8 dPage 78 of 92\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\n53:21, 60:16, 62:8, 91:16 72:17, 79:18, 141:11, 153:14, 83:11, 85:20，提出 90:12, 90:20, 190:6 86:22, 104:18 55:3 153:1, 162:17，利润 166:7, 166:24，可能地，目前 130:15, 169:14 167:17, 83:17, 84:7, 41:2 187:4，项目 12:16，特权 154:21，保存 21:7, 94:24, 13:8，邮寄 162:7, 95:23, 96:1 103:8 123:18, 160:17, 163:16, 163:20，项目，总统 166:14, 161:14 166:20, 94:9 34:20, 175:8，已发布 166:23, 167:24 175:20，进展 87:7，很可能 55:6，施压 106:11 123:10 33:1, 34:12, 87:12，承诺 65:13, 65:15, 37:1, 54:2，潜在的 65:18 117:7 100:12, 130:18, 45:9, 45:21，假装，发音 151:19，潜在地 54:25 8:9, 8:11，问题 158:7 173:4, 174:14，相当 123:22, 126:22, 54:23, 137:21，权力，发音 148:25 79:3，现行的 9:8, 9:9, 9:10，惯例，继续进行 172:7 178:18 8:5, 25:7, 72:4，证明，防止 84:11，PRC 126:9 146:16，已继续进行 149:15，先前，适当地 8:6，先于 8:10, 8:11 16:18, 16:24，程序 49:5 136:24, 137:12，财产 5:9, 7:5, 72:6，偏见 137:17 129:24, 130:18 72:22 172:18, 173:6，先前地，提议，诉讼程序 173:9, 174:7 7:17, 47:12, 7:1 7:23，场所 57:5, 58:4，提出 149:12，收益 66:10, 122:11, 142:22 159:19，准备，专有的，制作，原则 153:19 20:10, 64:6, 94:21 142:24, 144:24, 149:8 169:21，被起诉 178:13，准备，打印 13:21 12:16，已制作 19:12, 20:6, 33:10, 33:13，起诉 135:15, 136:22, 20:15, 43:20，之前 12:25 139:8, 140:6, 63:25 48:21, 63:13，起诉 147:17, 147:24，已准备 85:1, 67:8, 12:24 154:23, 159:24, 122:1 44:22 44:2, 120:19，保护 160:10, 160:16，准备人，监狱 78:19 176:25 174:18, 44:23 130:23, 131:11，保护，制作 29:2, 39:21, 124:3, 124:8, 64:3, 149:12，私下地 110:7, 110:8, 67:24, 159:16 139:3, 140:7, 110:20，处方 110:11，保护措施 140:10, 142:22, 15:10，特权 28:12, 28:23, 143:23, 177:12，出席 7:10, 27:17, 74:20, 74:23 188:21 27:24, 32:3, 19:6, 25:2，保护性的，专业的 41:9, 41:12，出席 127:3 2:9, 102:17, 45:14, 46:3, 3:18, 6:23，协议 54:14\nCase 22:5007:20 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/02/2012022113:56:18 9 dPage 79 of 92\n\n证实 pursuing 159:8 52:20, 55:11, 95:9, 134:20 种族 57:19, 58:20, 96:3, 114:14, 114:10 159:2 60:18, 86:14, 提出 87:25, 87:15, 提供 种族主义 53:1, 94:19. 88:20, 88:21, 44:19, 44:23, 123:15, 159:5 131:10, 68:17, 97:23, 99:20, 70:16, 131:11, 151:23, Randazza（兰达扎）101:5, 101:13, 164:14, 70:19, 70:23, 164:11, 3:3, 3:8, 71:4, 73:17, 168:9, 168:15, 52:13, 104:11, 123:11, 72:2 123:16, 123:13, 183:23 强奸犯 114:16, 116:25, 126:6, 127:10, 128:4, 135:22, 108:1, 问 108:11, 127:12, 128:21, 139:1, 140:9, 108:18, 109:1, 询问 129:10, 129:25, 148:17 110:5, 110:8, 10:15, 88:25 132:21, 136:5, 已提供 110:13, 110:12, 问题 143:20, 153:8, 42:16, 43:9, 110:18, 132:19, 6:14, 7:2, 154:22, 157:18, 46:7, 46:16, 134:5, 144:20, 15:6, 59:2. 157:24, 158:23, 46:25, 69:1, 151:5, 182:12 62:11, 62:14, 160:15, 161:15, 69:4, 69:16, 比率 68:3, 68:7, 168:5, 169:2, 97:11, 125:11, 119:22 68:15, 68:13, 169:12, 177:10 139:24, 140:11, 而非 68:18, 72:9, 实时 140:15, 143:21, 7:3, 16:3, 72:12, 77:20, 2:10, 190:7 170:12 147:6, 34:23, 34:25, 78:9, 79:21, 再问 公开 54:14 80:1, 83:16, 33:20, 143:17 2:11, 路 83:18, 86:11, 理由 82:25, 183:25, 3:13 86:14, 86:17, 11:1, 24:2, 184:1, 190:7 达到 87:23, 88:4, 60:20, 62:6, 拉取 172:4 88:19, 88:8, 62:9, 62:10, 121:13, 167:5 阅读 90:7, 118:14, 83:17, 103:17, 惩罚性 17:6, 17:7, 126:9, 136:21, 106:12, 114:3, 132:8, 132:21, 17:20, 52:21, 143:17, 147:20, 147:14, 159:7, 133:14 52:22, 52:25, 148:2, 171:6, 168:5, 174:24, 购买 53:2, 53:4. 186:25 178:13 93:18 61:1, 89:6, Quiang（强）收到 已购买 89:8, 106:2, 80:10 47:17, 51:12, 59:10, 59:12 107:4, 113:1, 快速 52:8, 52:7, 声称 123:16, 141:23, 59:1 52:12, 52:16, 146:4, 146:3, 141:25, 161:6, 安静 52:18, 53:5, 177:1 161:8 71:24 180:12 目的 阅读 相当 收到 26:8, 83:19, 34:12, 55:15 29:16, 100:21, 45:7, 45:18, 83:20, 131:3, 准备好 101:5, 113:19, 52:20, 52:24, 133:8, 156:16 65:11 143:19, 155:19, 53:4, 53:16, 目的 真正 168:20, 186:7, 54:6, 178:23 26:5, 26:13, 10:13, 21:12. 186:12 收到 26:19 27:1, 27:2, 引述 53:14 依据 34:18, 34:22, 171:9, 171:10 休庭 19:7, 22:15, 36:10, 36:18, R 66:9, 79:13. 22:19, 188:9 37:3, 37:16, 种族 102:8, 155:5 追求 37:17, 37:21, 158:19, 159:4, 134:19\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoOHDZ31KPFiledQS/110/02/254EnteFieebO3/113:56:180 d第 80 页，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 Anril 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n于 April 1, 2021 进行\n识别 38:5, 38:19, 83:12, 85:21 换述\n22:24, 156:22, 40:7,\n40:21, 相关 7:13, 70:21\n158:5 41:21, 42:6, 10:11, 62:11, 替换\n回忆 42:21, 44:20, 83:15,\n62:14, 93:13, 94:6,\n103:1 45:4, 45:16, 84:8,\n83:22, 94:20\n建议 46:4, 46:13, 85:15,\n84:11, 报告\n16:8, 16:10, 46:23, 48:15, 86:12,\n88:20, 40:13, 42:9,\n86:6 49:19, 50:21, 88:21,\n127:11 161:8, 161:13\n建议的 67:17, 69:13, 依赖 报告的\n16:18, 168:8 75:11, 75:20, 117:22, 183:13 1:15, 54:10,\n记录 76:3, 76:16, 评论 130:21, 146:1\n42:19, 79:12, 91:8,\n77:1, 113:17 记录员\n84:7,\n85:25, 127:13, 161:24, 记得 2:10, 5:1, 5:4,\n86:2,\n86:3, 162:18, 162:25, 18:3, 23:6, 5:13,\n58:8,\n89:8,\n91:9, 163:7, 170:2, 23:13, 32:23, 58:12, 58:25,\n130:1, 141:25, 171:17, 172:2, 34:5, 35:23, 80:11, 81:22,\n184:1, 190:13 181:14, 184:7, 82:6,\n82:7, 89:6, 141:17,\n已记录 185:11 101:20, 123:17, 141:21, 184:22,\n115:8 关于 126:4, 126:25, 190:6, 190:7\n录音 45:8,\n7:9, 127:11, 144:9, 代表\n21:20, 21:22 45:21, 79:17, 147:23, 150:20, 6:9, 26:6,\n记录 79:21, 100:13, 150:21, 153:8, 26:20, 27:7,\n97:10, 127:1, 175:16, 187:3 154:5, 154:17, 27:12, 27:16,\n129:17, 129:20, 涉及 154:21, 158:8, 27:22, 106:25,\n185:20, 185:23, 130:6 169:6, 171:7, 121:5, 121:20,\n185:24 登记 183:5 155:11, 155:17,\n恢复 2:9, 180:9, 记住 155:21, 156:17,\n102:10, 102:14 180:13, 190:5 116:18 171:9\n已恢复 登记册\n179:13 提醒 陈述\n102:12 重新解释 77:3 25:14, 25:20,\n恢复 141:24 远程 36:1,\n48:8,\n102:18, 102:21, 被拒绝 1:12, 2:8 84:6,\n85:14\n102:25, 120:7, 57:11 作出 陈述\n173:20 相关 29:25, 47:18 183:13\n代表\n提及 162:3, 190:16 作出\n37:19 55:1\n156:2, 163:9 关系 呈现 已代表\n提及 182:19 29:18, 36:17 35:5, 35:13,\n16:24, 34:8 关系 续期 48:21, 62:22,\n提及 24:16, 82:21, 154:3 71:19, 72:22,\n32:5 83:7,\n85:5, 人民币 88:22\n提及 85:10, 162:4, 93:7, 93:17 代表\n160:24\n拒绝 169:13, 181:22, 重复 25:25, 47:21,\n182:1 11:6, 73:14, 48:1, 48:4,\n12:23, 68:3,\n68:7, 68:17 相对 119:1, 127:17, 49:11, 77:18,\n拒绝 155:17 141:18, 141:19, 77:19, 92:21\n相关性 141:21, 151:19 代表\n12:13, 13:20,\n24:24, 37:12, 60:17, 72:6, 重复 25:23, 26:18\n150:7\n\nCase 22e500130-Dood50231KPFiledd3/119/02/199221137569861 d第 81 页，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n共和国 50:5,\n50:15, 保留 修订\n57:1 50:20, 67:14, 157:2, 158:2 124:2, 124:8,\n请求 74:8,\n75:17, 聘用费 125:1, 142:21,\n87:18, 127:2, 75:25, 76:13, 26:12 188:20\n131:14, 140:6, 76:23,\n90:2, 报复 革命\n142:22, 143:22 91:5,\n109:17, 94:11 12:5\n请求的 118:6, 119:9, 返回 ria\n119:14, 120:9,\n68:21, 185:2 120:15,\n130:8, 42:10, 42:17, 110:25,\n111:2,\n请求 139:3,\n135:12, 46:7,\n46:17, 111:10, 111:12,\n124:3, 124:8, 143:12,\n143:21, 67:10, 131:18, 111:18, 111:24,\n124:11, 124:15, 161:21,\n159:15, 134:13, 134:16, 112:6\n139:3, 145:23, 163:4, 181:9 荒谬\n188:20 162:22, 返回物 61:13, 160:8\n要求 164:16,\n169:16, 38:23, 39:3, 权利\n7:1,\n42:18, 171:14, 171:24, 40:11, 43:8, 11:2, 17:3,\n69:1, 70:16, 183:20, 185:8, 43:12, 44:2, 21:25, 26:25,\n70:19, 70:23, 185:17 44:4, 44:22, 28:4, 33:18,\n71:3, 73:17 回应 74:4, 181:5 35:16, 41:17,\n要求 86:2 揭示 43:7, 60:8,\n72:24 回应 16:6, 19:16, 77:4, 79:5,\n要求 109:18, 171:5 20:8, 20:12, 79:7, 79:23,\n71:9, 71:15 回应 25:5, 26:9, 81:1,\n85:16,\n保留 171:10 26:23, 28:16, 89:1,\n93:21,\n161:10 答复 28:19, 31:24, 94:4, 111:4,\n保留的 140:6, 142:21, 52:2, 68:23, 118:21, 125:7,\n4 : 1 1 143:22, 171:3, 69:20, 69:23, 126:1, 130:9,\n住所 171:8 70:6, 70:10, 131:13, 132:10,\n22:4, 77:4, 答复 90:17, 103:15, 103:22, 104:1, 138:9, 142:10,\n81:1 124:1, 124:7, 122:7, 143:1, 144:15, 148:3,\n尊重 170:13, 188:18 责任 144:2, 152:1, 152:10, 170:20,\n27:23, 67:23, 164:3, 165:9, 172:8, 183:5\n135:5 负责 165:10, 166:15, 权利\n155:22, 162:2, 113:15, 134:25, 167:8, 167:12 12:9, 12:21,\n162:4, 175:12 135:1, 145:17, 24:20,\n30:5,\n受尊重的 135:1, 145:17, 揭示 31:4,\n30:20,\n91:23 146:10 16:11, 31:22, 37:8,\n31:13,\n各自的 回应性 63:9,\n64:5, 38:2, 38:15,\n4:5 95:12,\n96:7, 90:21, 104:4, 40:5,\n40:19,\n回应 108:24, 127:24, 122:9, 152:3, 41:6,\n42:4,\n12:8, 12:20, 134:22, 145:23, 163:16, 164:5, 42:14, 44:13,\n24:20, 30:4, 147 : 11 173:11 45:2,\n45:12,\n31:12, 37:8, 收入 45:24, 46:11,\n38:2, 38:15, 限制\n40:4,\n41:6, 161:1, 161:6 40:24, 41:24, 46:21,\n48:12,\n49:17,\n42:3, 42:13, 受限制的 42:10, 45:19, 50:6,\n44:12,\n45:1, 53:25 46:18, 49:25 50:19, 67:15,\n45:11,\n45:24, 结果 审查 67:20,\n74:9,\n46:20,\n46:10, 113:8 16:20, 20:14, 75:18,\n76:1,\n48:11,\n49:16, 保留 43:8 76:14, 76:24,\n26:2\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 102-1 Filed 03/19/22 Entered 03/19/22 13:56:36 Page 82 of LMNOPQRSTUVTSWXYZT[\\]^\\_U`aObcWdTP]efOgSdhRZhRP\\MiOZR\\_jkR 92\n\nCase 22-50073\nDoc 102-1\nFiled 03/19/22\nEntered 03/19/22 13:56:36\n第 82 页，共\nLMNOPQRSTUVTSWXYZT[\\]^_U`aObcWdTP]efOgSdhRZhRP\\MiOZR_jkR\n#\\$%&'(\\$)*+,-.,/%&0/,1\n2,&34(+53,&6*\\$)789:;:8 <8\n\n!\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"!\n\n\"!\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n=>6?@#A@=BC <<6?@#A@=BCD2BK\nCase 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK PFiled 03/11/09/22/2113:56:18 3 d第 83 页，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\n100:23, 108:12, 105:23, 135:24, 严重 93:1, 93:5, 111:3, 112:25, 177:6, 180:8, 131:5 93:8, 93:12, 114:25, 123:11, 181:23, 182:1 性的 93:13, 93:19, 被判刑 125:24, 94:4, 94:5, 124:10, 110:23, 112:2, 128:19, 130:13, 66:20 94:6, 94:12, 112:6 130:25, 132:9, 94:22, 95:6, 分别 应当 132:23, 133:24, 95:25, 96:23, 45:14, 79:22 4:10 134:13, 140:14, 分别地 股份 97:19, 97:25, 142:3, 144:14, 99:2, 109:6, 143:3, 168:3 130:15. 160:1. 146:1, 149:11, 110:4, 110:7, 九月 160:25, 161:19 149:16, 153:15, 111:17, 112:12, 67:7, 67:8, Sherry（雪莉）113:12, 113:14, 179:22, 181:21, 99:10, 100:14, 22:2 183:3 113:15, 114:18, 172:13, 183:8 Sherry-Netherland（雪莉—尼德兰）看见 115:1, 115:17, 严重 52:14, 52:17, 124:13 116:3, 116:8, 87:15, 101:7, 55:5, 53:9, 寻求 129:20, 129:23, 157:18 77:4, 81:1 130:13, 130:18, 146:25, 154:3 严肃地 射击 130:21, 131:12, 似乎 86:10, 88:9 43:6 135:17, 140:3, 32:15, 110:22, 已送达 短 144:16, 145:9, 147:23 123:3 21:13 145:15, 145:16, 似乎 送达 射中 146:1, 146:7, 148:12 40:25, 42:10, 150:5 149:13, 146:9, 已看见 45:19, 46:18, 应当 149:20, 149:24, 22:21, 23:2, 66:6 15:4, 16:15, 153:18, 179:24, 32:15, 52:9, 服务 47:22, 54:10, 181:22, 182:4, 111:10, 122:16, 29:18, 29:25, 54:11, 62:24, 182:10, 182:18, 123:12, 133:3, 36:17, 37:19, 104:1, 106:6, 184:17, 184:20 138:23, 139:23, 47:17 111:23, 125:25, Shuiyan's（水岩的）177:3 庭审 127:12, 130:8, 77:18, 92:12, 看见 62:13, 154:15 135:21, 141:11, 96:12, 96:19, 28:10 设定 142:5, 145:16, 144:17, 153:17 自证其罪-151:25, 157:19, 105:7, 124:3, 签署 161:12, 164:3, 124:8, 124:23, 24:13, 25:1, 13:4, 41:15 125:2, 188:20, 182:7 33:5, 32:20, 发送 展示 189:6, 190:11, 39:3, 33:11, 29:12, 36:16, 190:21 22:7, 60:8 91:21, 92:1, 37:14, 51:11, 设定 展示了 126:15, 127:8, 51:14, 51:15, 105:3 89:17, 91:24, 180:23 54:2, 99:7, 已解决 122:11, 128:11 签名 130:23, 177:8, 172:11 显示 23:2, 23:4, 181:24 和解 60:21 23:7, 24:3, 发送 已显示 172:4 125:5, 125:6 61:24, 99:5 111:13, 七 签名-p1kal 发送 111:21, 153:21 46:6, 46:15 190:22 56:5 Shuiyan（水岩）若干 已签署 已发送 1:4, 78:14, 72:12, 95:1, 4:15, 4:17, 18:15, 51:13, 86:13, 87:10. 132:12, 142:18, 24:7, 32:19, 52:13, 54:17, 150:14 92:13, 92:21,\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\nCase 22:5007:20-DoO516231KPFileDd3/119/2254EnteFieedO3113722113:569864 d第 84 页，共 92 页\n\nHowan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\n32:25, 33:2, 36:14, 42:25, 39:17,\n43:6, 175:15\n\n54:7,\n33:8, 33:14, 53:21,\n54:12, 59:16, 58:25,\n83:6,\n99:25, 传播\n125:12, 125:19, 108:10, 131:16\n126:5, 126:25\n签署 72:3, 79:24,\n79:25, 83:17, 109:11,\n112:3,\n123:21, 155:2, 传播\n32:23 93:20,\n83:18, 164:13 94:1, 94:10,\nSilvestri（西尔维斯特里）93:21,\n97:8, 种类 114:8,\n114:19,\n48:18 100:1, 100:14, 55:3, 84:10, 131:4, 131:20,\n135:3\n简单 106:9, 106:12, 126:11, 149:22\n75:13, 107:6, 126:11, 129:4, 寻求 间谍\n110:5\n149:7, 149:12, 114:3, 136:6\n151:3, 151:4 149:15, 154:20, 听起来 ਟ ਟੈ\n190:3\n仅仅 166:5, 166:6, 7 : 4\n137:9 173:1, 176:25 来源 st\n同时 某人 32:13\n11:5, 40:16, 23:8 55:8, 116:15, 稳定性\n72:14,\n95:14, 不知何故 183:16, 184:2 93:23\n96:8, 109:13, 150:21 来源 开始\n112:8, 121:10, 某人 57:6, 116:19 182:5, 182:7,\n133:16, 133:21, 55:15, 62:1, 南部 182:16\n134:21, 135:6, 92:20, 107:6, 160:16, 161:13 开始了\n136:9, 138:4, 115:1, 152:16, 南方 108:12, 108:13,\n138:16, 154:6, 178:11 1:2,\n6:12, 108:15, 183:7\n165:3, 165:7,\n166:2 某事 155:24, 169:24 开始\n同时 20:2, 25:8, 说话 18:16, 72:24,\n154:18 48:25, 56:11, 105:21 109:8\n\n发言 开始\n自 76:5,\n86:16, 10:24,\n85:23, 121:14\n65:24, 97:21, 95:16, 95:17, 138:10, 147:12, 州\n110:22, 116:2, 128:24, 141:10, 183:18 9:18, 10:2,\n124:12, 174:6 152:18, 152:21, 特别 12:18, 13:21,\n单一 165:17, 166:17, 55:9 13:23, 15:25,\n169:7 166:25, 168:25 具体 32:24, 33:20,\n先生 有时 102:5, 142:20 36:22, 38:22,\n6:8, 131:22 54:1,\n54:20, 具体而言 40:10,\n40:25,\n情况 54:24,\n54:22, 20:25,\n21:4, 43:20,\n44:10,\n104:14 56:15, 56:16, 158:6, 179:6 46:8,\n45:8,\n小 57:10, 75:1, 推测 46:17, 57:22,\n146:17 76:9, 77:7, 164:25 67:2,\n67:11,\n社交 81:20, 99:12, 拼写 74:5, 190:2\n9:25, 11:13, 99:13, 99:14, 58:8, 58:10 州\n11:24, 110:10 99:15, 99:17,\n99:18 已拼写 172:21\n仅 某处 18:5 陈述\n162:7 157:14 拼写 35:2, 116:7,\n庄严地 儿子 8:20, 11:10, 133:1, 133:4\n5:13 11:14, 11:18, 陈述\n一些 80:8, 87:4,\n87:24 11:21,\n18:1 22:15, 22:19,\n6:18, 9:14, 口头说出 32:20, 136:4,\n20:10, 22:25, 抱歉 63:10, 63:13, 171:12, 171:20,\n32:13,\n20:1,\n\nPLANET DEPOS（Planet Depos）888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交于 03/19/22 登记于 03/19/22 13:56:36 第 85 页，共 92 页\n\nHo Wan Kwok（郭文贵）于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\n188:9 停止 提交 确定\n\n州 19:20, 72:15, 67:9, 102:16 6:19, 8:10,\n1:1, 2:11, 78:24,\n78:22, 已提交 36:15, 43:19,\n7:24,\n9:19, 78:25, 79:2, 74:5 54:8,\n56:7,\n10:5, 10:9, 96:4, 114:5, 已签署 58:18, 100:21,\n12:18, 13:24, 131:3, 131:4, 187:11 100:22, 106:7,\n14:2, 14:8, 131:19, 164:15 后续 111:1, 118:22,\n14:12, 14:23, 已停止 120:18 122:12, 122:14,\n27:25,\n28:13, 20:2 随后 122:19, 123:12,\n28:24,\n29:3, 商店 87:8, 146:22 123:14, 123:19,\n34:20,\n34:14, 128:2, 128:3, 实质 125:8, 127:19,\n45:19, 46:8, 129:17 15:9 128:15, 139:22,\n47:1,\n66:17, 已储存 成功地 148:5, 148:20,\n66:21,\n67:4, 97:4, 99:2 102:13 151:20, 165:1,\n91:3, 107:18, 故事 起诉 175:18, 183:21,\n183:12, 190:8 149:7, 149:8 31:19, 51:25, 186:7\n陈述 奇怪 101:3, 101:14, 周围\n134:6 168:23 112:12, 183:8 87:23\n状态 战略 被起诉 暂停\n10:8, 10:12, 83:1, 83:2, 110:23, 173:16 187:2\n10:20, 11:2, 169:20 建议 suss\n11:4, 11:7, 13:7 策略 167:1, 167:2 78:7\n钢铁 167:9, 167:25, 建议 调查\n115:10 173:12, 173:14, 86:6 78:15\nSteinberg（斯坦伯格） 173:23, 174:9 起诉 宣誓\n174:11 流 11:2 5:13\n步骤 128:8 诉讼 宣誓\n60:25 街道 6:10, 102:4, 5:3\n已迈步 32:13 110:25 已宣誓\n65:9 罢工 套房 4:15, 4:18,\nSteve（史蒂夫） 9:16, 47:10, 3:5, 3:13 6:3, 187:11,\n84:17,\n82:3, 51:17, 55:22, 夏季 190:12\n85:6,\n85:5, 64:1, 66:25, 81:13, 82:4 系统\n85:10, 85:19\n仍然 75:5, 75:10, 超人 58:6, 172:21,\n95:12, 102:2, 154:22 175:1\n11:15, 19:23,\n68:1, 68:6, 106:4, 108:24, 补充 ப\n68:9, 83:9, 120:2, 138:2, 70:4, 117:1 t-e-e-r\n83:23, 83:25, 138:17, 141:16, 支持 59:3\n105:17, 111:22, 158:18, 179:11,\n184:22, 185:23 91:22, 92:23, T-Mobile（T-Mobile） \n165:16, 166:16, 强烈地 92:24, 93:22 61:6\n170:9, 174:6 87:18, 103:21 支持者 桌子\n规定 东西 94:25 98:25\n5:2 118:15 支持 采取\n已规定 主题 92:15 7:6, 12:3,\n4:3, 4:8, 4:13 40:24, 41:11 支持性的 31:19, 59:1,\n规定 提交材料 116:14 66:8, 84:21,\n172:12, 175:3 79:16 应当 84:24, 84:25,\n73:2\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交于 03/19/22 登记于 03/19/22 13:56:36 第 86 页，共 92 页\n\nHo Wan Kwok 于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\n97:18, 102:6, 74:12,\n181:5, 110:3, 165:17, 93:17\n110:19, 120:24, 181:9 165:20, 167:3, 事项\n135:5, 153:4, 税款 182:22 8:6, 21:1,\n154:13, 155:3 43:21, 43:23, 十 34:18, 36:15,\n已采取 44:9, 44:16, 15:14, 157:6, 52:20,\n62:3,\n8:2\n7:17, 75:7 157:8 74:19,\n87:22,\n采取 征税 十分钟 100:23, 109:2,\n85:7 40:25,\n45:8 155:3 111:9,\n115:17,\n采取 茶 几十 123:7, 132:10,\n12:12,\n13:19, 76:6 132:12, 133:13, 133:24, 135:16,\n37:11,\n38:18 教导 134:2, 150:14, 142:3,\n146:23,\n谈话 179:24 150:22 147:3,\n153:10,\n6:16, 11:2, 团队 期限 153:15, 157:17,\n20:17, 32:1, 55:10, 81:3 41:23, 119:17, 158:25,\n161:7,\n84:9,\n78:13, 团队 128:14, 141:9, 172:9\n142:5, 144:7, 54:7 142:10, 151:3 事项\n155:7, 167:10 技术人员 已作证 54:2, 54:6,\n谈过 3:19, 18:17, 6:3, 14:10, 85:11,\n84:13,\n53:16, 101:22, 18:20, 18:24, 14:12, 14:22, 133:25, 136:16,\n135:19, 136:2, 22:9,\n43:1, 25:9, 57:5, 143:5, 143:6,\n145:1, 145:3, 106:7, 106:9, 58:4, 66:10, 143:7,\n145:10,\n145:10 106:18, 120:25, 84:20, 107:20, 146:13, 166:12,\n谈话 121:15,\n122:21, 180:15 183:4\n8:24, 16:23, 123:22,\n124:9 作证 认为\n16:25, 33:7, 电话 74:14, 74:17, 28:3, 32:16,\n35:8, 35:24, 60:22,\n89:14 75:2,\n84:23, 32:25, 43:17,\n36:4, 71:22, 告诉 84:25, 184:4, 88:18,\n100:18,\n85:5,\n93:22, 17:11,\n20:11, 184:11, 184:14, 115:11, 117:4,\n98:15, 104:13, 58:10,\n34:15, 184:23 118:15, 133:11,\n112:24, 137:10, 61:21,\n74:1, 证词 141:8, 141:10,\n141:2, 142:20, 77:24,\n77:13, 14:11, 15:1, 150:12, 157:18,\n146:21, 150:3, 86:10,\n83:17, 33:1,\n44:19, 165:19, 170:9,\n156:14, 182:14, 86:23,\n103:4, 85:2, 85:18, 179:22, 181:17\n182:19 113:3,\n115:16, 190:14 第三方\n针对 117:7,\n141:7, 文本 44:16,\n87:2,\n55:13, 94:9 142:23, 147:4, 63:3, 176:25 87:16\n税 149:19, 153:10, 156:11, 156:15, 22:2, 32:13, 思考\n38:23, 39:3, 165:16, 167:1, 180:10 11:17, 85:22,\n39:8, 40:10, 167:3, 172:6, 感谢 94:3, 166:4\n41:3, 42:10, 174:8, 180:17, 8:19, 18:14, 千\n42:17, 43:8, 182:8, 182:16, 19:10, 24:1, 142:4\n43:12, 44:2, 182:18, 182:24 75:10, 78:22, 数千\n44:4, 44:22, 告诉 89:9, 133:15, 54:16, 133:13,\n44:23, 45:9, 27:5, 33:8, 142:12\n45:21,\n46:7, 83:5, 92:23, 138:25, 148:22, 威胁\n46:16, 67:10, 94:12, 95:6, 164:7, 167:19, 53:23, 53:24,\n73:23, 74:1, 95:8, 99:5, 170:5, 187:5 86:20, 87:1,\n74:3, 74:4, 因此 87:8, 87:15,\n55:4, 55:6,\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交于 03/19/22 登记于 03/19/22 13:56:36 第 87 页，共 92 页\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1\n提交于 03/19/22\nMNOPQRSTUVWUTXYZ[U\\]^_`VabPcdXeUQ^fgPhTeiS[iSQ]NjP[Z`klS\n92 登记于 03/19/22 13:56:36 第 87 页，共\n\n\\$%&'()%*+,-./-0&'10-2\n3-'45),64-'7+%*89:;<;9 =>\n\n!\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n\"\n\n?@7AB\\$CB?DE ===FGHHFHI>IJKKKF?@7AB\\$CB?DEF3DL\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交于 03/19/22 登记于 03/19/22 13:56:36 第 88 页，共 92 页\n\n145:11 45:12, 45:25, 70:18, 71:3, 106:16 推文发布者 46:11, 46:21, 71:14, 81:12, 上传 145:19 48:12, 49:17, 90:19, 103:24, 21:15, 21:20, 67:15, 143:8, 151:23, Twitter（推特） 50:6, 21:23 67:20, 74:9, 162:8, 163:13, 99:4, 上方 99:7, 75:18, 76:1, 163:25, 164:19, 109:4, 110:15, 61:2 76:14, 76:24, 165:12, 165:14, 150:3, 182:10, 楼上 182:19 90:3, 91:6, 165:15, 166:21 55:2 108:22, 118:7, 理解 两个 urqa 119:10, 119:15, 62:12, 74:13, 125:15 98:3, 101:17 119:25, 120:10, 不安 107:21, 112:3, 网址 120:16, 125:13, 113:7, 154:13, 86:11, 86:18, 64:22, 64:23, 126:18, 149:17, 86:24 168:12 65:2 149:22, 159:14, 联盟 两小时 使用 159:22, 160:2, 154:15 190:4 9:4, 9:6, 161:22, 162:23, 大亨 联合 16:17, 62:2, 163:5, 169:17, 160:18 1:1, 7:24, 89:13, 98:11, 171:15, 171:25, 9:19, 10:5, U 98:14, 104:6, 181:12, 184:5, 10:9, 12:17, 104:14, 104:16, 最终 185:9, 185:18 13:24, 14:2, 104:25, 106:17 177:11 基础的 14:8, 14:12, 有用的 una 80:22 14:23, 27:24, 148:13 3:20 理解 28:13, 28:24, 使用 无法 7:12, 6:18, 29:3, 34:13, 65:2, 98:15, 27:9, 36:5, 7:14, 7:15, 34:20, 45:19, 128:8, 134:8 36:23, 52:25, 15:6, 8:16, 46:8, 47:1, 通常 82:2, 126:14 24:6, 24:10, 66:21, 67:4, 34:5, 117:19, 无法解释的 24:13, 26:14, 91:3 117:22 150:12 26:16, 29:15, 未知 V 难以置信的 29:16, 52:19, 59:16 54:17, 136:16 v 67:22, 68:1, 除非 不舒服的 1:6 68:6, 68:9, 6:25, 7:9, 86:10, 86:19, 价值 68:19, 71:8, 84:5, 154:21 在……之下 149:5, 149:9, 73:20, 113:1, 不同于 5:6, 12:9, 150:13, 151:8, 128:19, 125:12, 129:20 151:24 12:17, 12:21, 138:8, 142:1, 解锁 24:21, 27:18, 有价值的 143:6, 143:20, 60:12 27:24, 29:8, 150:22, 151:12 154:1, 155:19, 直到 各种 30:2, 30:5, 169:23, 170:1, 135:9 30:20, 31:4, 151:24, 185:2 173:25, 175:18, 更新 31:13, 37:6, 拉斯维加斯 186:7, 186:12, 69:4 37:9, 37:25, 3:6, 93:18, 186:14, 186:22, 已更新 38:3, 38:6, 130:14 186:23 69:16 38:13, 38:16, 车辆 理解 上传 40:5, 40:19, 161:14 13:7, 16:13, 58:6, 66:5, 41:2, 41:7, 供应商 28:18, 19:6, 106:5, 106:15 42:4, 42:14, 41:10, 50:10, 32:9 已上传 44:13, 45:2, 口头的 68:25, 69:7, 42:25, 58:5, 95:24, 125:10\n\nHo Wan Kwok 于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交于 03/19/22 登记于 03/19/22 13:56:36 第 89 页，共 92 页\n\nHo Wan Kwok 于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\n口头地 愿景 想要 65:15, 86:1, 108:16 169:20 94:4, 183:22 55:2, 133:9 不是 核实 访问 战争 85:23 32:19, 178:7 92:21, 182:4 53:25, 55:12 已核实 声音 西部 搜查令 83:5 22:15, 22:19, 92:14, 92:24, 14:4 188:9 94:21, 121:9 搜查令 西方的 声音 18:11 核实 14:7 无论什么 94:15 112:4 华盛顿 Verizon（威瑞森） 35:23, W 91:20 47:25, 61:4 53:17, 61:22, 浪费 w-e-n-q-u-i 180:2 108:19, 145:17, 版本 16:3 8:21, 17:16, 146:10, 159:6, 17:22, 方式 等待 177:14, 185:13 124:14 5:10, 9:15, 19:19, 102:2, 通过 WhatsApp（WhatsApp） 10:11, 51:10, 118:4, 135:9, 98:19, 177:10, 177:10, 182:2 69:7, 70:18, 136:11 182:2 恶毒的 71:2, 83:21, 等待 112:15, 87:13, 87:24, 无论什么 114:6, 106:14 72:6, 101:23 131:4, 131:18 108:14, 111:13, 放弃 下落 129:9, 144:24, 恶毒地 4:7 108:15 145:6, 145:20, 137:11 Wang（王） 146:6, 153:2, 据此 恶毒性 91:18, 92:12, 156:8, 183:7, 190:20 112:16 92:19, 93:3, 190:18 是否 视频 113:11, 175:5, 方式 10:21, 12:24, 21:12, 21:14, 175:15, 175:19, 166:13 23:2, 25:19, 21:16, 58:5, 175:20, 176:11, 富有的 36:10, 38:21, 64:14, 66:5, 182:2 115:17, 129:23, 41:14, 39:6, 92:6, 92:8, 想要 92:10, 130:2, 130:3, 44:15, 54:8, 92:15, 8:5, 8:17, 54:10, 130:22 54:9, 94:14, 99:24, 27:2, 28:7, 103:18, 128:16, 穿着 54:11, 73:23, 34:19, 34:22, 75:23 85:7, 122:4, 128:23 52:19, 58:16, 122:12, 123:12, 周 视频会议 71:25, 85:15, 125:8, 129:14, 59:11, 3:1 59:23, 86:9, 115:25, 148:14 视频 125:22, 126:5, 138:14, 140:3, 无论哪一个 127:8 21:13, 57:18, 126:15, 145:3, 147:3, 欢迎 49:8 58:2, 95:22, 147:12, 148:19, 吹哨人 86:3, 103:14 98:24, 99:7 149:18, 151:21, 111:5 观众 Wengui（文贵） 175:18, 183:1, 134:3 1:7, 22:14, 白色 183:21 134:17 22:25, 23:7, 违反 被通缉的 无论谁 121:17, 122:24, 66:22 59:1, 77:17, 47:20 弗吉尼亚 123:25, 124:21, 77:23, 78:11, 160:18, 180:9, 全部 168:13, 178:10, 91:21, 117:9, 188:8, 188:13, 83:16, 174:4, 179:7, 180:25, 117:23, 133:1, 188:15, 188:17, 184:17 183:11 133:4, 165:17, 189:3 病毒 妻子 182:23 去了 82:25 77:10, 77:22, 9:13, 64:20,\n\nPLANET DEPOS 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 102-1 提交于 03/19/22 登记于 03/19/22 13:56:36 第 90 页，共 92 页\n\nHo Wan Kwok 于 April 1, 2021 进行的证词记录\n\n78:8, 80:4, 20:1, 21:3, 包裹 170:24, 172:5,\n\n87:24 21:6,\n58:9, 166:6 172:16, 173:1,\n无线网络 60:10, 70:1, 写 173:3, 174:14,\n129:5, 129:6 70:3, 70:10, 185:1 174:22, 175:2,\nwilkinson（威尔金森） 72:8,\n84:9, 写作 175:10\n3:20 86:9,\n86:4, 128:20, 128:21, な\n不管愿不愿意 95:15, 96:10, 182:19 y-e-l-i-a-n-g\n75:1 100:20, 106:14, 书面 152:19\n风 111:20, 118:17, 38:11, 110:16, yang（杨）\n118:20, 154:7, 128:14, 139:20, 110:17, 125:9, 91:18\n154:9 141:15, 141:20, 135:17, 140:2, yanping（燕萍）\n窗户 149:19, 187:5, 171:5 175:5, 175:19\n118:18, 118:20, 188:2, 190:10, 错误 是\n154:8, 154:9 190:14, 190:20 94:5, 142:10, 81:16\n电线 wolman's（沃尔曼的） 169:1, 172:7,\n129:6, 176:19, 19:15 172:25, 179:16 年\n176:23 赢得 写了 14:5, 29:9,\n希望 120:4 132:24, 144:18 42:11, 43:23,\n88:13, 88:14, 精彩 X 44:10, 181:6\n116:20, 181:18 167:20 年\n撤回 woodbury（伍德伯里） X 15:14, 15:17,\n40:23, 41:25,\n137:12 101:18 166:17 46:6, 46:15,\n已撤回 单词 x-1 142:18\n137:18 26:7, 100:20, 170:21\n已撤回 151:4 x-i-a 是或否\n20:5\n137:19 词语 152:19 yieliang（叶良）\n扣留 7:3, 96:1, x-1-a-n-m-i-n 8:4, 14:20\n70:14, 70:22, 122:12, 134:8, 152:23, 170:15 yingnan（英男）\n73:16 134:9, 146:5 x-i-n-o 110:2, 116:9\n在……之内 工作 170:23 york（约克）\n4:14, 41:24, 23:20 x-i-o-n-g 2:11,\n1:2,\n60:14, 99:11, 工作过 152:23, 170:15\nxi（习） 6:12, 10:2,\n190:8 150:8, 154:25 23:24, 24:14,\n没有 工作 108:3, 182:15\nxia（夏） 25:10, 25:24,\n16:11, 27:5, 23:19, 23:20, 30:14, 30:16,\n31:22, 63:9, 23:21, 23:24, 151:16, 152:17\nxianmin（先民） 31:1, 31:10,\n64:5, 69:10, 114:24, 115:14 32:8, 32:12,\n73:8, 103:12, 工作 151:17, 170:15, 33:20, 38:9,\n104:4, 104:19, 136:13, 167:18 170:19, 170:24,\n172:5, 172:16, 38:12, 38:22,\n122:9, 152:3, 世界 39:1, 39:4,\n160:13, 163:15,\n54:18,\n18:11, 173:2, 173:3,\n163:21, 164:5, 71:21,\n95:1 174:14, 174:22, 39:7, 39:11,\n164:20, 164:22, 担心 175:2, 175:10 39:14, 39:18,\n165:17, 165:20, 154:10 xino 39:24, 40:1,\n167:3, 171:11, 值得 170:22 40:14, 40:25,\n43:20, 44:9,\n173:9, 173:11, 150:22, 153:3, xiong（雄） 45:8, 46:8,\n173:20 163:2 151:17, 152:21, 46:17, 49:22,\n证人 不会 170:15, 170:19,\n6:2, 14:18, 122:19\n\n案卷 22:5007:30 - DoOSIOZAK P，提交于 03/11/2012 11:56:18 1 0，第 91 页（共 92 页）\n\n于 April 1, 2021 进行的 Howan Kwok（郭文贵）笔录\n\n131:19 22 49:24, 50:3, 1 50:23, 51:1, ા ୧ 66:9 1 55:25, 56:2, 187:6 23 79:13 56:22, 18 56:25, 179:14, 188:8 1.1 63:19, 67:11, 22:2, 24 80:15, 160:18 72:1, 74:6, 171:21, 180:10 124:6, 125:24, 1.4 120:2, 120:5, 1801 126:1, 126:3 108:4 120:13, 155:24, 22:2 25 10 162:5, 168:12, 1:-cv--kpf 44:7 2:5, 23:11, 169:25, 172:21, 1:6 26.1 23:15, 24:4, 176:2, 174:17, 22:16, 22:20, 2 25:1, 65:8 180:11, 190:8 188:10 2 100 york's（约克的） 2764 102:8 96:16, 124:10, 175 : 1 3:5 124:14, 151:14, 20 youtube（优兔） 2nd（第二） 151:17, 152:15, 1:6, 118:14, 92:14 190:21 152:20, 152:22, 157:10, 188:7 yuan（元） 3 161:13, 173:16 2011 96:17, 151:13 10022 184:16 30 yvette（伊薇特） 180:11 2017 21:7, 29:5 175:5, 175:20 101 67:7, 67:8, 31 Z 107:18 91:12, 99:24, 102:8 zip（邮政编码） 107 111:5 360803 42:25 183:11, 188:11 2018 1:17 zoom（缩放） 109 92:9, 92:11, 3733 106:17 3:5 97:24, 97:25, 171:10 0 12 99:10, 99:24, 39 99:25, 66:9 100:10, 00 79:13, 155:5 100:15, 103:19, 12,000 2:5, 127:23 4 104:15, 104:17, 178:17, 178:20, 001 4 107:2, 154:18, 178:23, 179:12, 18:16 155:5 160:17, 163:10, 179:18, 180:17, 003 40 177:2, 183:7, 180:23, 181:8 120:24 102:8 122 183:8 004 42,000 2019 188:12, 188:13 121:14 183:14, 183:16. 42:11, 171:22 123 005 184:15, 184:24, 188:15 2020 124:20 185:5 23:11, 23:15, 125 006 45 24:4, 43:24, 188:17, 189:3 123:20 66:9 44:10, 172:13, 13 007 5 179:5, 179:10, 107:18 22:8 50,000 179:14, 180:8, 14 008 181: 6 132:3 154:18, 163:10 122:20 2021 510 15 05678 1:13, 2:4, 160:1, 160:24 62:12, 99:23, 1:6 125:24, 187:13, રે રે 160:17, 172:13 09 190:22 155:5 15,000 79:13 20814 114:1, 131:2, 3:14\n\nPLANET DEPOS（普莱内特笔录服务） 888.433.3767 WWW.PLANETDEPOS.COM\n\n)#\\+\",\\#-! ./0121/ 3/\n\n案卷 22-50073 文件 102-1\n提交于 03/19/22\n录入于 03/19/22 13:56:36\n第 92 页（共\n\nDEFGHIJKLMNLKOPQRLSTUVWMXYGZ[O\\LHU]^G_K\\`JR`JHTEaGbJWcbJ\n\n!\"#\\$%#&'&#(\n\n英语>>>","key_entities":["Gavenman","Je","Guo","Kwok","CCP","Chinese Communist Party","GTV","Yanping Wang","CIPA"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":21,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":51952,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-03-19 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-03-19","updated_at":"2026-08-24 00:15:17"}