{"id":"court_ctb_1090_2","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":1090,"sub_number":2,"doc_type":"SUBPOENA","filed_date":"2022-11-14","title":"EXHIBIT B","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"# **EXHIBIT**\n\n**B**\n\n**UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\nChapter 11\n\nCase No: 22-50073 (JAM)\n\n24\n\n## **NON-PARTY MEI GUO'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO THE CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE'S REQUESTS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS INCLUDED WITH THE RULE 2004 EXAMINATION SUBPOENA SERVED UPON MS. GUO ON AUGUST 19, 2022**\n\n Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(B), made applicable to this proceeding by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004 and 9016, non-party, Mei Guo (\"Ms. Guo\"), by and through her undersigned counsel, objects and responds to the Requests for Production of Documents included with the Subpoena served upon Ms. Guo by the Chapter 11 Trustee as follows:[1](#page-1-0)\n\n## **I. OBJECTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS**\n\nDebtor.\n\nIn re:\n\nHO WAN KWOK,\n\n2. Electronically stored information must be produced in accordance with the following instructions: . . .\n\n**OBJECTION**: Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 2 on the grounds that it is unduly burdensome to require her to produce documents in the requested format because it would cause Ms. Guo to have to incur unnecessary and likely substantial expenses, including the expense of an ESI vendor to load, prepare and store documents. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(1) requires the Trustee and his counsel to avoid imposing undue burden upon a party subject to a subpoena; requiring Ms. Guo to produce documents in the requested format does the exact opposite, *i.e.,* it imposes\n\n<span id=\"page-1-0\"></span><sup>1</sup> The subpoena was served upon Ms. Guo via her counsel on August 19, 2022. Thus, Ms. Guo's Objections are served within fourteen days of the date the subpoena was served.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 3 of 24\n\nan undue burden on Ms. Guo. Thus, documents that Ms. Guo produces, if any, will be produced in a reasonably useable format.\n\n5. Each Request contained herein extends to all Documents: (a) in Your possession, custody, or control; or (b) in the possession, custody, or control of anyone acting on Your behalf, including Your counsel or other representatives and advisors. Each Document shall be produced in its entirety\n\n**OBJECTION**: Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 5 on the grounds that it is overly broad and therefore renders each Request for Production overly broad. Ms. Guo will produce responsive, non-privileged documents, if any, within her custody, possession or control.\n\n6. If You are requested to produce a Document that is no longer in Your possession, custody, or control, then Your response must (a) describe in detail the nature of the document and its contents; (b) identify the person(s) who prepared or authored the Document (and, if applicable, the Person(s) to whom the Document was sent); (c) identify the date on which the document was prepared or created; (d) state whether such Document (i) is missing or lost, (ii) has been destroyed, (iii) has been transferred, voluntarily or involuntarily, to others, or (iv) was otherwise disposed of; (e) state the reason for, and the facts and circumstances surrounding, such disposition; (f) identify the Persons who authorized such disposition; (g) identify the date or approximate date of such disposition; (h) state when the Document was most recently in Your possession, custody or control; and (i) identify the Person, if any, presently in possession, custody, or control of such Document\n\n**OBJECTION**: Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 6 on the grounds that it purports to place a burden on her that is not otherwise required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, or Local Rules of the United States District Court for\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 4 of 24\n\nthe District of Connecticut. Ms. Guo will not provide the information requested in instruction numbered 6.\n\n7. If You are requested to produce a Document that has been destroyed, then Your response must state, in addition to the information required by the preceding Instruction: (a) the reason for the Document's destruction; (b) the identity of the Person who destroyed the Document; and (c) the identity of the Person who directed that the Document be destroyed.\n\n**OBJECTION:** *See* Objection to instruction numbered 6.\n\n8. If You claim that a requested Document is privileged or attorney work-product, then Your response must: (a) state (i) a description of the Document adequate to support Your contention that the Document is privileged, (ii) the title of the Document, (iii) the date of the Document, (iv) the author of the Document, (v) the addressee of the Document, (vi) the identity of each Person who received or saw the original or any draft, copy, or reproduction of the Document, (vii) whether the Document itself, or any information contained or referred to in the Document is in the possession, custody, or control of any other Persons, and if so, the identity of such Persons, as well as a statement addressing how the information came into their possession, (viii) the claim of privilege under which the Document is withheld, and (ix) all of the circumstances upon which You will rely to support such claim of privilege; and (b) produce a privilege log containing all of the information requested in Part (a) of this Instruction for each Document withheld on the basis of a claim of privilege in accordance with D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e).\n\n**OBJECTION**: Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 8 on the grounds that it is unduly burdensome in that it calls for far more information than required by D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e). To the extent that Ms. Guo withholds responsive documents on the basis of privilege she will provide a privilege log that complies with the requirements of D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e).\n\n9. If a portion of an otherwise responsive Document contains information subject to a claim of privilege, only that portion of the Document subject to the claim of privilege shall be deleted or redacted from the Document following the instructions above, and the rest shall be produced.\n\n**OBJECTION:** *See* Objection to instruction numbered 8. To the extent Ms. Guo redacts on the basis of privilege, the reactions will be set forth on a privilege log that complies with the requirements of D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e).\n\n11. If a Document is in a language other than English, You should provide that Document. If a Document is in a language other than English, and an English translation exists, You should provide both Documents.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 11 to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to incur the expense to review and translate documents that are in a language other than English or her native language.\n\n12. All references to Entities includes all affiliates thereof.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 12 to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain the identity of all affiliates of the as defined Entities. Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to Entities and affiliates known to her.\n\n13. All references to individual names include all alternative names, aliased, or nicknames.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 13 to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain \"all alternative names,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 6 of 24\n\naliased, or nicknames\" used by individuals inquired about in the Trustee's Requests for Production. Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to \"alternative names, aliased, or nicknames\" known to her.\n\n14. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, the period of time covered by the Document Requests is the period from February 5, 2012 to the date responses to the Document Requests are due.\n\n**OBJECTION**: Ms. Guo Objects to instruction numbered 14 on the grounds that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome and makes every Request for Production into which it is incorporated overly broad and unduly burdensome inasmuch as the Trustee cannot articulate a good faith basis to require Ms. Guo to search for and produce documents over a more than ten year period. Ms. Guo will not search for documents dating back to February 5, 2012. Ms. Guo's counsel will meet and confer with the Trustee's counsel in order to agree upon a more reasonable and appropriate time period.\n\n#### **III. OBJECTIONS TO DEFINITIONS**\n\nMs. Guo generally Objects to the Trustee's Definitions on the grounds that certain terms are defined multiple times in different ways, first by incorporating the definitions and rules of construction of D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(c) and (d), and then by individually defining some of the same terms that are defined within the Local Rules, e.g., Document and Communication. In responding to the Requests for Production Ms. Guo will apply the most restrictive definition to terms that are defined in multiple ways in order to avoid undue burden.\n\n1. \"You\" or \"Your\" or \"Yourself\" means and refers to Mei Guo (a/k/a Mei Gui, 郭 美, or any other alias), together with all of its affiliates, divisions, agencies, instrumentalities,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 7 of 24\n\ndepartments, offices, partners, officers, directors, agents, attorneys, representatives, employees, and/or anyone acting on its behalf.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to the definition of the terms \"You\" or \"Your\" or \"Yourself\" on the grounds that the definition defines an entity, not a natural person. In responding to the Requests for Production and producing responsive documents, if any, Ms. Guo will comply with her obligation to produce responsive documents in her custody, possession and control.\n\n2. \"Debtor\" means Ho Wan Kwok (a/k/a Miles Kwok, Miles Guo, Guo Wengui, Guo Haoyun, 郭文贵, or any other alias), together with his employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to the definition of the term \"Debtor\" to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain any aliases of the Debtor, or any of the Debtor's employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf. Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to any aliases of the Debtor, or any of the Debtor's employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf known to her.\n\n3. \"Debtor's Son\" means Qiang Guo (a/k/a Mileson Kwok, 郭强, or any other alias), together with his employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to the definition of the term \"Debtor's Son\" to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain any aliases of the Debtor's Son, or any of the Debtor's Son's employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf. Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to any aliases of the Debtor's Son, or any of the Debtor's Son's employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf known\n\nto her.\n\n5. \"Debtor's Purported Wife\" means Hing Chi Ngok (a/k/a Hing Chi Ng, Yue Qingzhi, 岳庆芝, or any other alias), together with her employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on her behalf.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to the definition of the term \"Debtor's Purported Wife\" to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain any aliases of the Debtor's Purported Wife, or any of the Debtor's Purported Wife's employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on her behalf. Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to any aliases of the Debtor's Purported Wife, or any of the Debtor's Purported Wife's employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on her behalf known to Ms. Guo.\n\n6. \"Debtor's Family\" means, collectively, the Debtor, the Debtor's Son, the Debtor's Daughter, and the Debtor's Purported Wife, and any other familial relation to the Debtor.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to the definition of the term \"Debtor's Family\" to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain \"any other familial relation to the Debtor.\" Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to any \"familial relation to the Debtor\" known to Ms. Guo. Ms. Guo also Objects to the definition of the term \"Debtor's Family\" on the grounds that it is overly broad and makes every request into which it is incorporated overly broad because it includes any individual to whom the Debtor is related, regardless of the distance of the relationship, *e.g.*, tenth cousin.\n\n7. \"Associated Individuals\" means, individually and collectively, all individuals that (1) hold, control, have custody over, or discretion over assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 9 of 24\n\nthe Debtor or the Debtor's Family; or (2) have been employees, directors, or otherwise are affiliated with one or more Associated Entities, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of the foregoing. Such Associated Individuals shall include, but are not limited to: Daniel Podhaskie, Jason Miller, Steve Bannon, Karin Maistrello, Melissa Francis, William Gertz, Arethusa Forsyth, Glenn Mellor, Jennifer Mercurio, Eduardo Eurnekian, Han Chunguang (a/k/a 韩春光), Qu Guojiao (a/k/a Qu Guo Jiao, 屈国姣), Guo Lijie (a/k/a 郭丽杰), Zhang Wei (a/k/a 张伟\\*), Lihong Wei Lafrenz (a/k/a Sara Wei, 魏丽红), Hao Haidong (a/k/a 郝海东), Ross Heinemeyer, Max Krasner, Kyle Bass, Melissa Mendez, Ya Li (a/k/a 李娅), Dinggang Wang (a/k/a 王定刚), An Hong (a/k/a 安红), Yvette Wang (a/k/a Yanping Wang, Yan Ping Wang, 王雁平), Fiona Yu, Je Kin Ming (a/k/a William Je, Yu Jianming, 余建明 ), Yaz Qingua, and Lao Jiang (a/k/a Jiang Yunfu, Jiang Yunfu Be, 姜云浮).\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to the definition of the term \"Associated Individuals\" to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain \"all individuals that (1) hold, control, have custody over, or discretion over assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family; or (2) have been employees, directors, or otherwise are affiliated with one or more Associated Entities, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of the foregoing.\" Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to \"individuals that (1) hold, control, have custody over, or discretion over assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by the Debtor; or (2) have been employees, directors, or otherwise are affiliated with one or more Associated Entities, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 10 of 24\n\nthe foregoing.\" known to Ms. Guo. Ms. Guo also Objects to the definition of the term \"Associated Individual\" on the grounds that it is overly broad and makes every request into which it is incorporated overly broad because it purports to include \"all individuals that (1) hold, control, have custody over, or discretion over assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by . . . the Debtor's Family, regardless of whether the Debtor owns or controls such assets.\n\n8. \"Associated Entities\" means, individually and collectively, all organizations or Entities of any type that (1) have been owned, controlled, or invested in by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family; or (2) have an interest, whether directly or indirectly, in any assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of the foregoing. Such Associated Entities shall include, but are not limited to: 7 Nod Hill LLC, AAGV Limited, ACA Investment Management Limited, ACA Capital Group Limited, Ace Decade Holdings Limited, AI Group Holdings Inc., Alfa Global Ventures Limited, Alfonso Global Limited, Allied Capital Global Limited, Alpine Fiduciaries SA, Anton Development Limited, Assets Sino Limited, Auspicious Coast Limited, Beijing Pangu Investment Co., Beijing Pangu Investment Co. Ltd., Beijing Pangu Investment Inc., Beijing Zenith Holdings Company Limited, Bravo Luck Limited, BSA Strategic Fund I, China Golden Spring (Hong Kong) Limited, Chuang Xin Limited, Crane Advisory Group LLC, Creative Apex Investments Limited, Crystal Breeze Investments Limited, Dawn State Limited, Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, Elite Well Global Limited, Empire Growth Holdings, G Club Operations LLC, G Fashion LLC, G News LLC, GETTR USA, Genever Holdings Corporation, Genever Holdings LLC, GFASHION MEDIA GROUP INC., GFNY, Inc., Globalist International Limited, GNews Media Group Inc., Golden Spring (New York) Ltd., Greenwich Land LLC, Guo Media, GTV Media Group, Inc., Hamilton Capital\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 11 of 24\n\nHoldings Inc., Head Win Group Limited, Henan Yuda, Himalaya Embassy, Himalaya Exchange, Himalaya Federal Reserve, Himalaya Supervisory Organization, HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited LLC, Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited, Infinite Increase Limited, Infinitum Developments Limited, Insight Phoenix Fund, Lamp Capital LLC, Leading Shine Limited, Leading Shine NY Limited, Long Gate Limited, Next Tycoon Investments Limited, New 10 Federal State of China (a/k/a NFSC), Noble Fame Global Limited, Rosy Acme Ventures Limited, Rule of Law Foundation III, Inc., Rule of Law Foundation IV, Inc., Rule of Law Fund, Rule of Law Society, Rule of Law Society IV, Inc., G-Translators PTY LTD, Saraca Media Group, Inc., Shiny Ace Ltd., Shiny Times Holdings Ltd., Spirit Charter Investment Limited, Stevenson, Wong & Co., Voice of Guo Media, Inc., Well Origin Ltd., World Century Limited, Worldwide Opportunity Holdings Limited, Whitecroft Shore Limited, and ZIBA Limited.\n\n**OBJECTION:** Ms. Guo Objects to the definition of the term \"Associated Entities\" to the extent that it purports to require Ms. Guo to undertake an investigation or analysis to ascertain the identity of \"all organizations or Entities of any type that (1) have been owned, controlled, or invested in by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family; or (2) have an interest, whether directly or indirectly, in any assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of the foregoing.\" Ms. Guo will not undertake such an investigation or analysis and limits her responses to the Trustee's Requests for Production to \"organizations or Entities of any type that (1) have been owned, controlled, or invested in by the Debtor [ ]; or (2) have an interest, whether directly or indirectly, in any assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by the Debtor [ ], together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 12 of 24\n\nany of the foregoing\" known to Ms. Guo. Ms. Guo also Objects to the definition of the term \"Associated Entities\" on the grounds that it is overly broad and makes every request into which it is incorporated overly broad because it purports to include \"all organizations or Entities of any type that (1) have been owned, controlled, or invested in by . . . the Debtor's Family; or (2) have an interest, whether directly or indirectly, in any assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by . . . the Debtor's Family, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of the foregoing,\" regardless of whether the Debtor owns or controls such entities.\n\n#### **IV. OBJECTIONS TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION**\n\n1. All Documents regarding any income or Asset of the Debtor, the Debtor's estate, or an Associated Entity.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it calls for her to make legal conclusions in determining whether \"any income or asset\" is an asset of the Debtor, part of the undefined \"Debtor's estate,\" or an asset of an Associated Entity. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorneyclient privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo also incorporates her Objection to the defined term Associated Entity. Ms. Guo is unaware of any assets of the Debtor. As such, Ms. Guo will not undertake a futile search for responsive documents.\n\n2. All Documents related to the Debtor's financial condition and obligations to his creditors, including without limitation all Documents related to any effort to avoid paying such obligations and All Documents related to this or any other actual or potential bankruptcy or similar insolvency proceeding.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 13 of 24\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that the term \"Debtor's financial condition\" is undefined and is therefore vague and ambiguous. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing Objections, non-privileged responsive documents located after a good faith search, if any, will be produced.\n\n3. All Documents regarding any balance sheet, bank statement, account statement, financial statement, statement of account, wire transfer instructions and/or confirmation, proof of funds, certificate of deposit, certificate of holdings, investment portfolio summary, or similar document relating to the Debtor, the Debtor's Estate, the Debtor's Family, an Associated Entity, or an Associated Individual, including without limitation all Documents sufficient to show all Transfers to any of the foregoing.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and seeks information about the assets of non-debtors, including Ms. Guo, which will not be produced. Ms. Guo also Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it calls for her to make legal conclusions in determining whether any of the assets listed in the Requests is owned by the Debtor. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo also incorporates her Objection to the defined terms Debtor's Family and Associated Entity, and Objects to the production of banking and financial information of Associated Entities. Ms. Guo does not have in her possession, custody or control\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 14 of 24\n\ndocuments of the Debtor that could be responsive to this Requests for Production, and Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce non-Debtor documents of the type requested.\n\n4. All Documents regarding any investment, business dealing or transactions made by, with, or on behalf of the Debtor.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing Objection, non-privileged responsive documents located after a good faith search, if any, will be produced.\n\n5. All Communications with the Debtor, and Documents related to Communications with the Debtor, related to the operation, management, or decision-making of any Entity, including without limitation the Associated Entities.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that the term \"Documents related to Communications\" is vague and confusing. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome in that it purports to require the production of \"[a]ll Communications with the Debtor, and Documents related to Communications with the Debtor, related to the operation, management, or decision-making of any Entity\" regardless of the Entity, the Debtor's interest in the Entity, and the substance of the communication. Ms. Guo also Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo incorporates her Objections to the defined term Associated Entities. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing Objections, non-privileged responsive communication between Ms. Guo\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 15 of 24\n\nand the Debtor concerning the operation of Associated Entities located after a good faith search, if any, will be produced.\n\n6. All Documents regarding any Transfer, investment, or other transaction or business dealing made to, by, or with the Debtor, the Debtor's Family, or an Associated Entity.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and seeks information about the assets and investments of non-debtors, including Ms. Guo, which will not be produced. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo also incorporates her Objection to the defined terms Debtor's Family and Associated Entity, and Objects to the production of documents regarding \"any Transfer, investment, or other transaction or business dealing\" of any Associated Entities in which the Debtor has no ownership interest. Ms. Guo is unaware of any \"Transfer, investment, or other transaction or business dealing made to, by, or with the Debtor\" within the last four years, and as a result Ms. Guo will not undertake a futile search for responsive documents.\n\n7. All Documents regarding any property ever occupied or used by the Debtor, including without limitation the Lady May; the Sherry Netherland Hotel / Condominium; the residential property located in Greenwich, Connecticut at 373 Taconic Rd.; the residential property located in Greenwich, Connecticut at 33 Ferncliff Rd.; and the residential property located in Wilton, Connecticut at 354 Nod Hill Rd.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome in that it (i) seeks information about the assets of non-debtors, including Ms. Guo, which will not be produced, and (ii) seeks all\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 16 of 24\n\nDocuments related to \"property ever occupied or used by the Debtor\" regardless of the content of the Document. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo also Objects to the production of documents regarding assets owned by Associated Entities in which the Debtor has no ownership interest. Based on the breadth of this Request, Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production as propounded.\n\n8. All Documents related to any investments or trading by the Debtor, the Debtor's Family, or an Associated Entity, in or around July 2020, or at any other time, in crude oil futures or any similar commodity, including without limitation Communications with Jiang Yunfu Be regarding any such investments or trading.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and seeks information about investments or trading of non-debtors, including Ms. Guo, which will not be produced. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo also incorporates her Objection to the defined terms Debtor's Family and Associated Entity, and Objects to the production of documents regarding commodities trading, if any, by Associated Entities in which the Debtor has no ownership interest. Ms. Guo is unaware of any trading \"in or around July 2020, or at any other time, in crude oil futures or any similar commodity, including without limitation Communications with Jiang Yunfu Be\" by the Debtor and Ms. Guo will not undertake a futile search for responsive documents.\n\n9. All Documents related to any aircraft owned, controlled, or used by the Debtor,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 17 of 24\n\nincluding without limitation the aircraft bearing tail number T7-GQM and any other aircraft registered in San Marino, including without limitation copies of all registration documents and flight manifests showing flights taken by such aircraft and the individuals onboard such flights.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it calls for her to make legal conclusions in determining whether any aircraft was \"owned\" or \"controlled\" by the Debtor. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing Objections, non-privileged responsive documents that are related to the Debtor's use or ownership of any \"aircraft . . . including . . . the aircraft bearing tail number T7-GQM and any other aircraft registered in the Republic of San Marino\" located following a good faith search, if any, will be produced.\n\n10. All Documents regarding any gifts, benefits or loans, to, from or on behalf of the Debtor, the Debtor's Estate, the Debtor's Family, or the Associated Entities, including without limitation Documents sufficient to show the amounts of such gifts, benefits, or loans; the purposes for which such gifts, benefits, or loans were used; when the gifts, benefits, or loans were provided; and the terms of any loans, all representations and warranties made in connection with any loans, the interest rate on any loans, and all evidence of payments of any loans.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and seeks information about \"gifts, benefits, or loans\" made or given by non-debtors, including, as propounded, completely unrelated thirdparty financial institutions, to non-debtors, including Ms. Guo, which will not be produced. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 18 of 24\n\ndocuments and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo also incorporates her Objection to the defined terms Debtor's Family and Associated Entity. Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production as propounded.\n\n11. All Documents concerning any trust or similar instrument set up by, on behalf of, or for the benefit of the Debtor, the Debtor's Estate, the Debtor's Family, or an Associated Entity, including without limitation Documents sufficient to show when the trust(s) was created, by whom it was created, for whose benefit it was created, and the corpus of the trust.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome and seeks information about \"trusts or similar instruments\" set up by non-debtors for the benefit of non-debtors, including Ms. Guo. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo also incorporates her Objection to the defined terms Debtor's Family and Associated Entity. Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production as propounded.\n\n12. All Documents related to any obligation, claim, liability, or debt associated with any legal dispute involving the Debtor, including but not limited to those relating to any litigation before any local, state, federal, or international body, whether an administrative body, court, panel, or alternative dispute resolution entity.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad, and unduly burdensome in that it seeks \"[a]ll Documents related to any obligation, claim, liability, or debt associated with any legal dispute involving the Debtor,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 19 of 24\n\n. . .\", regardless of the content of the Document. Ms. Guo also Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it seeks documents that are publicly available. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production to the extent that it calls for the production of documents and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production as propounded.\n\n13. All Documents and communications between any of your outside counsel or other advisors and the Debtor.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad, and unduly burdensome in that it seeks \"[a]ll Documents and communications between any of your outside counsel or other advisors and the Debtor\" regardless of the content of the Document or communication. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it calls for the production of documents, communications, and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, including the common interest privilege, and the attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production as propounded.\n\n14. Documents sufficient to show all of Your Assets and sources of income or funding.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it purports to require Ms. Guo to produce documents sufficient to show \"all of [her] Assets and sources of income or funding\" even though Ms. Guo is not a debtor. The Trustee is not entitled to the information he seeks via this Request for Production, Ms. Guo is not required\n\nto produce the requested Documents, and Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production.\n\n15. For all Assets identified in response to Request 14 having a value of more than \\$50,000, all (i) Documents related to Your acquisition of such Asset and (ii) Communications with the Debtor or the Debtor's Family regarding such Asset.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** *See* Objection and Response to Request for Production numbered 14.\n\n16. Copies of Your tax returns.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it purports to require Ms. Guo to produce her personal tax returns even though Ms. Guo is not a debtor. The Trustee is not entitled to the information he seeks via this Request for Production, Ms. Guo is not required to produce her personal tax returns, and Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production.\n\n17. Documents sufficient to show all bank accounts and investment accounts within Your possession or control, including the balances of and transfers to and from each such account.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it purports to require Ms. Guo to produce documents sufficient to show \"all bank accounts and investment accounts within [her] possession or control,\" *i.e.*, Ms. Guo's personal accounts, even though Ms. Guo is not a debtor. The Trustee is not entitled to the information he seeks via this Request for Production, Ms. Guo is not required to produce the requested Documents, and Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 21 of 24\n\n18. All Documents regarding any credit cards used by You, including without limitation monthly statements or other Documents sufficient to show all purchases related thereto for the benefit of the Debtor or an Associated Entity.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome in that it purports to require Ms. Guo to produce all documents regarding any credit card she has used, including her personal credit card and including *any* purchase she has made on any credit card. Ms. Guo is not a debtor. The Trustee is not entitled to the information he seeks via this Request for Production, Ms. Guo is not required to produce the requested Documents, and Ms. Guo will neither search for nor produce documents responsive to this Request for Production.\n\n19. All corporate governance and organizational Documents, including without limitation by-laws and certificates of incorporation and other Documents sufficient to show Your corporate structure, names of officers and directors, business purpose, and relationship to the Debtor or to any member of the Debtor's Family.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is not applicable to her as a natural person.\n\n20. All Documents related to any Associated Entity that You hold or have held an interest in.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it purports to require Ms. Guo to produce all documents \"related to any Associated Entity that [she] hold[s] or ha[s] held an interest in.\" Ms. Guo is not a debtor. The Trustee is not entitled to the information he seeks via this Request for Production, and Ms. Guo is not required to produce the requested Documents. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production on\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 22 of 24\n\nthe grounds that it calls for the production of documents, communications, and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, including the common interest privilege, and the attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing Objections, Ms. Guo will produce non-privileged responsive documents related to HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC (\"HK\") because issues related to HK are already being litigated in a related adversary proceeding.\n\n21. All Communications with the Debtor, and Documents related to Communications with the Debtor, related to the operation, management, or decision-making of any legal entity, including without limitation the Associated Entities.\n\n**OBJECTION AND RESPONSE:** Ms. Guo Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that the term \"Documents related to Communications\" is vague and confusing. Ms. Guo further Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome in that it purports to require Ms. Guo to produce all \"Communications with the Debtor, and Documents related to Communications with the Debtor, related to the operation, management, or decision-making of any legal entity\" regardless of the entity and regardless of the content of the communication. Ms. Guo also Objects to this Request for Production on the grounds that it calls for the production of documents, communications, and information protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, including the common interest privilege, and the attorney work product doctrine. Subject to and without waiving the foregoing Objections, Ms. Guo will produce non-privileged responsive documents related to HK because issues related to HK are already being litigated in a related adversary proceeding.\n\n24\n\nDated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 2nd day of September, 2022.\n\n### **NON-PARTY, MEI GUO**\n\n*/s/ James M. Moriarty* Eric Henzy (ct12849) Stephen M. Kindseth (ct14640) Aaron A. Romney (ct28144) James M. Moriarty (ct21876) John L. Cesaroni (ct29309) 10 Middle Street, 15th Floor Bridgeport, Connecticut 06604 Telephone: (203) 368-4234 Facsimile: (203) 368-5487 Email: [ehenzy@zeislaw.com](mailto:ehenzy@zeislaw.com) [skindseth@zeislaw.com](mailto:skindseth@zeislaw.com) [aromney@zeislaw.com](mailto:aromney@zeislaw.com) [jmoriarty@zeislaw.com](mailto:jmoriarty@zeislaw.com)  [jcesaroni@zeislaw.com](mailto:jcesaroni@zeislaw.com)\n\n#### **CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**\n\nThe undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Non-Party Mei Guo's Responses and Objections to the Chapter 11 Trustee's Requests for the Production of Documents Included with the Rule 2004 Examination Subpoena Served Upon Ms. Guo on August 19, 2022 was served by electronic mail on this 2nd day of September 2022 on the following counsel of record for the Chapter 11 Trustee:\n\nDouglas E. Barron: [douglassbarron@paulhastings.com;](mailto:douglassbarron@paulhastings.com) Nicholas Bassett: [nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com;](mailto:nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com) Avi E. Luft : [aviluft@paulhastings.com;](mailto:aviluft@paulhastings.com) Patrick Linsey [plinsey@npmlaw.com.](mailto:plinsey@npmlaw.com)\n\n *James M. Moriarty* James M. Moriarty (ct21876)","body_zh":"证物\n\nB\n\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格州联邦地区破产法院布里奇波特分部）\n\n第11章\n\n案号：22-50073 (JAM)\n\n非当事人 Mei Guo（郭美）对第11章受托人随于2022年8月19日向 Guo 女士送达的规则2004审查传票一并提出的文件出示请求所作的答复及异议\n\n根据 Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(B)，并经 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004 和 9016 适用于本程序，非当事人 Mei Guo（“Guo 女士”）通过其下列签名律师，就第11章受托人向 Guo 女士送达的传票所附文件出示请求提出异议并作出答复如下：[1]\n\n一、对指示的异议\n\n债务人。\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n\n2. 电子存储信息必须依照下列指示出示：. . .\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为2的指示提出异议，理由是要求其按所请求的格式出示文件造成不当负担，因为这将导致 Guo 女士承担不必要且可能数额巨大的费用，包括聘请 ESI 供应商加载、准备及存储文件的费用。Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(1) 要求受托人及其律师避免对受传票约束的一方施加不当负担；要求 Guo 女士按所请求的格式出示文件恰恰相反，即施加\n\n1 传票于2022年8月19日通过 Guo 女士的律师向其送达。因此，Guo 女士的异议在传票送达之日起十四日内送达。\nCase 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 3 of 24\n\n对 Guo 女士的不当负担。因此，如 Guo 女士出示任何文件，该等文件将以合理可用的格式出示。\n\n5. 本文所载每一项请求均延及所有文件：(a) 在您占有、保管或控制之下的文件；或 (b) 在代表您行事的任何人占有、保管或控制之下的文件，包括您的律师或其他代表及顾问。每份文件均应完整出示\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为5的指示提出异议，理由是该指示范围过宽，因而使每一项文件出示请求的范围均过宽。如有，Guo 女士将出示其保管、占有或控制之下的相关且不享有特权的文件。\n\n6. 如要求您出示一份已不再由您占有、保管或控制的文件，则您的答复必须：(a) 详细说明该文件的性质及其内容；(b) 确认准备或撰写该文件之人的身份（以及，如适用，该文件被发送给的人员）；(c) 确认该文件准备或制作的日期；(d) 说明该文件是否 (i) 缺失或遗失，(ii) 已被销毁，(iii) 自愿或非自愿地转让给他人，或 (iv) 以其他方式处置；(e) 说明该等处置的理由，以及围绕该等处置的事实和情形；(f) 确认授权该等处置之人的身份；(g) 确认该等处置的日期或大致日期；(h) 说明该文件最近一次由您占有、保管或控制的时间；以及 (i) 确认目前占有、保管或控制该文件之人（如有）的身份\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为6的指示提出异议，理由是该指示意图对其施加《联邦民事诉讼规则》、《联邦破产程序规则》或 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut（美国康涅狄格州联邦地区法院）地方法规并无其他要求的负担。Guo 女士不会提供编号为6的指示所要求的信息。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 4 of 24\n\n7. 如要求您出示一份已被销毁的文件，则除前述指示所要求的信息外，您的答复还必须说明：(a) 该文件被销毁的理由；(b) 销毁该文件之人的身份；以及 (c) 指示销毁该文件之人的身份。\n\n异议：见对编号为6的指示的异议。\n\n8. 如您主张所请求的文件享有特权或律师工作成果保护，则您的答复必须：(a) 说明 (i) 足以支持您关于该文件享有特权之主张的文件描述，(ii) 文件标题，(iii) 文件日期，(iv) 文件作者，(v) 文件收件人，(vi) 收到或见过该文件原件或任何草稿、副本或复制件的每一人员的身份，(vii) 该文件本身，或该文件所载或提及的任何信息，是否由任何其他人员占有、保管或控制；如是，则确认该等人员的身份，并说明该信息如何由其取得，(viii) 据以扣留该文件的特权主张，以及 (ix) 您将据以支持该等特权主张的全部情形；以及 (b) 根据 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e)，就基于特权主张而扣留的每份文件，出示一份载有本指示第 (a) 部分所要求全部信息的特权清单。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为8的指示提出异议，理由是其要求的信息远超 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e) 所要求的信息，因而造成不当负担。如 Guo 女士基于特权扣留相关文件，其将提供符合 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e) 要求的特权清单。\n\n9. 如本可回应请求的文件中有一部分包含受特权主张约束的信息，则仅应依照上述指示从该文件中删除或遮盖受特权主张约束的该部分，余下部分应予出示。\n\n异议：见对编号为8的指示的异议。如 Guo 女士基于特权进行遮盖，该等遮盖将载于符合 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e) 要求的特权清单中。\n\n11. 如一份文件使用英语以外的语言，您应提供该文件。如一份文件使用英语以外的语言，且存在英文译本，您应同时提供两份文件。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为11的指示提出异议，限于该指示意图要求 Guo 女士承担审阅和翻译非英语或非其母语文件的费用。\n\n12. 对实体的一切提及均包括其所有关联方。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为12的指示提出异议，限于该指示意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明所定义实体的所有关联方身份。Guo 女士不会进行该等调查或分析，并将其对受托人文件出示请求的答复限于其所知的实体及关联方。\n\n13. 对个人姓名的一切提及均包括所有其他名称、别名或昵称。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为13的指示提出异议，限于该指示意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明受托人文件出示请求所询问的个人使用的“所有其他名称、别名或昵称”。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 6 of 24\n\nGuo 女士不会进行该等调查或分析，并将其对受托人文件出示请求的答复限于其所知的“其他名称、别名或昵称”。\n\n14. 除非另有明确说明，文件请求所涵盖的期间为自2012年2月5日起至文件请求答复到期之日止。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对编号为14的指示提出异议，理由是该指示范围过宽且造成不当负担，并使纳入该指示的每一项文件出示请求均范围过宽且造成不当负担，因为受托人无法说明有善意依据要求 Guo 女士检索并出示十年以上期间的文件。Guo 女士不会检索可追溯至2012年2月5日的文件。Guo 女士的律师将与受托人的律师会面协商，以就更合理和适当的期间达成一致。\n\n三、对定义的异议\n\nGuo 女士总体上对受托人的定义提出异议，理由是某些术语以不同方式被定义多次，首先纳入 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(c) 和 (d) 的定义及解释规则，随后又对地方法规中已经定义的部分相同术语逐一定义，例如文件和通信。在答复文件出示请求时，Guo 女士将对以多种方式定义的术语适用最严格的定义，以避免不当负担。\n\n1. “您”或“您的”或“您本人”指 Mei Guo（又名 Mei Gui、郭美，或任何其他别名），连同其所有关联方、部门、机构、工具机构、\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 1090-2 Filed 11/14/22 Entered 11/14/22 11:56:29 Page 7 of 24\n\n处室、办事处、合伙人、高级职员、董事、代理人、律师、代表、雇员，和/或任何代表其行事的人。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对“您”或“您的”或“您本人”各术语的定义提出异议，理由是该定义界定的是实体而非自然人。在答复文件出示请求及出示相关文件时，如有，Guo 女士将履行其出示由其保管、占有和控制的相关文件的义务。\n\n2. “债务人”指 Ho Wan Kwok（又名 Miles Kwok、Miles Guo、Guo Wengui、Guo Haoyun、郭文贵，或任何其他别名），连同其雇员、代理人、律师、顾问，或任何代表其行事的人。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对“债务人”术语的定义提出异议，限于该定义意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明债务人的任何别名，或债务人的任何雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人的任何别名。Guo 女士不会进行该等调查或分析，并将其对受托人文件出示请求的答复限于其所知的债务人的任何别名，或债务人的任何雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人的任何别名。\n\n3. “债务人的儿子”指 Qiang Guo（又名 Mileson Kwok、郭强，或任何其他别名），连同其雇员、代理人、律师、顾问，或任何代表其行事的人。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对“债务人的儿子”术语的定义提出异议，限于该定义意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明债务人的儿子的任何别名，或债务人的儿子的任何雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人的任何别名。Guo 女士不会进行该等调查或分析，并将其对受托人文件出示请求的答复限于其所知的债务人的儿子的任何别名，或债务人的儿子的任何雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人的任何别名。\n\n5. “债务人所谓的妻子”指 Hing Chi Ngok（又名 Hing Chi Ng、Yue Qingzhi、岳庆芝，或任何其他别名），连同其雇员、代理人、律师、顾问，或任何代表其行事的人。\n\n异议：Guo 女士（郭女士）对“债务人声称的妻子”一词的定义提出异议，理由是该定义意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明债务人声称的妻子的任何别名，或者债务人声称的妻子的任何雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人的任何别名。Guo 女士不会进行此类调查或分析，并将其对受托人的文件出示请求的答复限于 Guo 女士所知的债务人声称的妻子，或者债务人声称的妻子的任何雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人的任何别名。\n\n6. “债务人家庭成员”系指，合称债务人、债务人之子、债务人之女及债务人声称的妻子，以及与债务人具有任何其他家庭关系的人员。\n\n异议：Guo 女士对“债务人家庭成员”一词的定义提出异议，理由是该定义意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明“与债务人具有任何其他家庭关系的人员”。Guo 女士不会进行此类调查或分析，并将其对受托人的文件出示请求的答复限于 Guo 女士所知的“与债务人具有家庭关系的人员”。Guo 女士还对“债务人家庭成员”一词的定义提出异议，理由是其范围过宽，并使纳入该定义的每一项请求均范围过宽，因为其包括与债务人有任何亲属关系的任何个人，而不论该亲属关系的远近，例如第十代表亲。\n\n7. “关联个人”系指，单独及合称所有符合以下条件的个人：(1) 持有、控制、保管或对债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或享有的资产拥有处置权；或 (2) 曾担任一个或多个关联实体的雇员、董事，或以其他方式与其有关联，以及前述任何一方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。该等关联个人应包括但不限于：Daniel Podhaskie（丹尼尔·波德哈斯基）、Jason Miller（杰森·米勒）、Steve Bannon（史蒂夫·班农）、Karin Maistrello（卡琳·迈斯特雷洛）、Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）、William Gertz（威廉·格茨）、Arethusa Forsyth（阿瑞图莎·福赛思）、Glenn Mellor（格伦·梅勒）、Jennifer Mercurio（詹妮弗·默库里奥）、Eduardo Eurnekian（爱德华多·欧内基安）、Han Chunguang（韩春光，又名 韩春光）、Qu Guojiao（屈国姣，又名 Qu Guo Jiao、屈国姣）、Guo Lijie（郭丽杰，又名 郭丽杰）、Zhang Wei（张伟，又名 张伟*）、Lihong Wei Lafrenz（魏丽红·拉弗伦茨，又名 Sara Wei、魏丽红）、Hao Haidong（郝海东，又名 郝海东）、Ross Heinemeyer（罗斯·海内迈耶）、Max Krasner（马克斯·克拉斯纳）、Kyle Bass（凯尔·巴斯）、Melissa Mendez（梅利莎·门德斯）、Ya Li（李娅，又名 李娅）、Dinggang Wang（王定刚，又名 王定刚）、An Hong（安红，又名 安红）、Yvette Wang（王雁平，又名 Yanping Wang、Yan Ping Wang、王雁平）、Fiona Yu（菲奥娜·余）、Je Kin Ming（余建明，又名 William Je、Yu Jianming、余建明）、Yaz Qingua（亚兹·钦瓜）及 Lao Jiang（姜云浮，又名 Jiang Yunfu、Jiang Yunfu Be、姜云浮）。\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交，于 11/14/22 11:56:29 录入，第 9 页，共 24 页\n\n异议：Guo 女士对“关联个人”一词的定义提出异议，理由是该定义意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明“所有符合以下条件的个人：(1) 持有、控制、保管或对债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或享有的资产拥有处置权；或 (2) 曾担任一个或多个关联实体的雇员、董事，或以其他方式与其有关联，以及前述任何一方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。”Guo 女士不会进行此类调查或分析，并将其对受托人的文件出示请求的答复限于 Guo 女士所知的“符合以下条件的个人：(1) 持有、控制、保管或对债务人拥有、控制或享有的资产拥有处置权；或 (2) 曾担任一个或多个关联实体的雇员、董事，或以其他方式与其有关联，以及前述任何一方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。”\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交，于 11/14/22 11:56:29 录入，第 10 页，共 24 页\n\nGuo 女士还对“关联个人”一词的定义提出异议，理由是其范围过宽，并使纳入该定义的每一项请求均范围过宽，因为该定义意图包括“所有符合以下条件的个人：(1) 持有、控制、保管或对……债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或享有的资产拥有处置权”，而无论债务人是否拥有或控制该等资产。\n\n8. “关联实体”系指，单独及合称所有符合以下条件的任何类型的组织或实体：(1) 曾由债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或投资；或 (2) 对债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或享有的任何资产直接或间接享有权益，以及前述任何一方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。该等关联实体应包括但不限于：7 Nod Hill LLC（七诺德山有限责任公司）、AAGV Limited（AAGV 有限公司）、ACA Investment Management Limited（ACA 投资管理有限公司）、ACA Capital Group Limited（ACA 资本集团有限公司）、Ace Decade Holdings Limited（艾斯十年控股有限公司）、AI Group Holdings Inc.（AI 集团控股股份有限公司）、Alfa Global Ventures Limited（阿尔法全球创投有限公司）、Alfonso Global Limited（阿方索全球有限公司）、Allied Capital Global Limited（联合资本全球有限公司）、Alpine Fiduciaries SA（阿尔卑斯受托人公司）、Anton Development Limited（安东开发有限公司）、Assets Sino Limited（华资有限公司）、Auspicious Coast Limited（吉祥海岸有限公司）、Beijing Pangu Investment Co.（北京盘古投资公司）、Beijing Pangu Investment Co. Ltd.（北京盘古投资有限公司）、Beijing Pangu Investment Inc.（北京盘古投资股份有限公司）、Beijing Zenith Holdings Company Limited（北京泽尼思控股有限公司）、Bravo Luck Limited（好运有限公司）、BSA Strategic Fund I（BSA 战略基金 I）、China Golden Spring (Hong Kong) Limited（中国金泉〈香港〉有限公司）、Chuang Xin Limited（创新有限公司）、Crane Advisory Group LLC（克兰咨询集团有限责任公司）、Creative Apex Investments Limited（创意顶峰投资有限公司）、Crystal Breeze Investments Limited（水晶微风投资有限公司）、Dawn State Limited（黎明州有限公司）、Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方利润有限公司）、Elite Well Global Limited（精英环球有限公司）、Empire Growth Holdings（帝国成长控股）、G Club Operations LLC（G Club 运营有限责任公司）、G Fashion LLC（G Fashion 有限责任公司）、G News LLC（G News 有限责任公司）、GETTR USA（GETTR 美国）、Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever 控股公司）、Genever Holdings LLC（Genever 控股有限责任公司）、GFASHION MEDIA GROUP INC.（GFASHION 媒体集团股份有限公司）、GFNY, Inc.（GFNY 股份有限公司）、Globalist International Limited（全球主义者国际有限公司）、GNews Media Group Inc.（GNews 媒体集团股份有限公司）、Golden Spring (New York) Ltd.（金泉〈纽约〉有限公司）、Greenwich Land LLC（格林威治土地有限责任公司）、Guo Media（郭媒体）、GTV Media Group, Inc.（GTV 媒体集团股份有限公司）、Hamilton Capital Holdings Inc.（汉密尔顿资本控股股份有限公司）、Head Win Group Limited（凯胜集团有限公司）、Henan Yuda（河南豫达）、Himalaya Embassy（喜马拉雅大使馆）、Himalaya Exchange（喜马拉雅交易所）、Himalaya Federal Reserve（喜马拉雅联邦储备）、Himalaya Supervisory Organization（喜马拉雅监督组织）、HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited LLC（香港国际基金投资〈美国〉有限责任公司）、Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）、Infinite Increase Limited（无限增长有限公司）、Infinitum Developments Limited（无限发展有限公司）、Insight Phoenix Fund（洞察凤凰基金）、Lamp Capital LLC（兰普资本有限责任公司）、Leading Shine Limited（领耀有限公司）、Leading Shine NY Limited（领耀纽约有限公司）、Long Gate Limited（长龙门有限公司）、Next Tycoon Investments Limited（下一大亨投资有限公司）、New Federal State of China（中国新联邦国，又名 NFSC）、Noble Fame Global Limited（高贵名望环球有限公司）、Rosy Acme Ventures Limited（玫瑰顶峰创投有限公司）、Rule of Law Foundation III, Inc.（法治基金会 III 股份有限公司）、Rule of Law Foundation IV, Inc.（法治基金会 IV 股份有限公司）、Rule of Law Fund（法治基金）、Rule of Law Society（法治协会）、Rule of Law Society IV, Inc.（法治协会 IV 股份有限公司）、G-Translators PTY LTD（G-Translators 私人有限公司）、Saraca Media Group, Inc.（Saraca 媒体集团股份有限公司）、Shiny Ace Ltd.（闪耀王牌有限公司）、Shiny Times Holdings Ltd.（闪耀时代控股有限公司）、Spirit Charter Investment Limited（精神宪章投资有限公司）、Stevenson, Wong & Co.（Stevenson, Wong & Co.）、Voice of Guo Media, Inc.（郭媒体之声股份有限公司）、Well Origin Ltd.（良好起源有限公司）、World Century Limited（世界世纪有限公司）、Worldwide Opportunity Holdings Limited（全球机会控股有限公司）、Whitecroft Shore Limited（怀特克罗夫特海岸有限公司）及 ZIBA Limited（ZIBA 有限公司）。\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交，于 11/14/22 11:56:29 录入，第 11 页，共 24 页\n\n异议：Guo 女士对“关联实体”一词的定义提出异议，理由是该定义意图要求 Guo 女士进行调查或分析，以查明“所有符合以下条件的任何类型的组织或实体：(1) 曾由债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或投资；或 (2) 对债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或享有的任何资产直接或间接享有权益，以及前述任何一方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人”的身份。Guo 女士不会进行此类调查或分析，并将其对受托人的文件出示请求的答复限于 Guo 女士所知的“符合以下条件的任何类型的组织或实体：(1) 曾由债务人 [ ] 拥有、控制或投资；或 (2) 对债务人 [ ] 拥有、控制或享有的任何资产直接或间接享有权益，以及前述任何一方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人”。\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交，于 11/14/22 11:56:29 录入，第 12 页，共 24 页\n\nGuo 女士还对“关联实体”一词的定义提出异议，理由是其范围过宽，并使纳入该定义的每一项请求均范围过宽，因为该定义意图包括“所有符合以下条件的任何类型的组织或实体：(1) 曾由……债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或投资；或 (2) 对……债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或享有的任何资产直接或间接享有权益，以及前述任何一方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人”，而无论债务人是否拥有或控制该等实体。\n\nIV. 对文件出示请求的异议\n\n1. 关于债务人、债务人财产或关联实体的任何收入或资产的所有文件。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士对该文件出示请求提出异议，理由是该请求要求其在确定“任何收入或资产”是否为债务人的资产、未被定义的“债务人财产”的一部分或关联实体的资产时作出法律结论。Guo 女士进一步对该文件出示请求提出异议，限于该请求要求出示受律师—委托人特权及律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件及信息的范围。Guo 女士还援引其对所定义术语“关联实体”的异议。Guo 女士不知道债务人的任何资产。因此，Guo 女士不会进行徒劳的搜索以查找回应性文件。\n\n2. 与债务人的财务状况及其对债权人的义务有关的所有文件，包括但不限于与任何试图避免支付该等义务的行为有关的所有文件，以及与本案或任何其他实际或潜在破产或类似无力偿债程序有关的所有文件。\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交，于 11/14/22 11:56:29 录入，第 13 页，共 24 页\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士对该文件出示请求提出异议，理由是“债务人的财务状况”一词未被定义，因此含糊不清且存在歧义。Guo 女士进一步对该文件出示请求提出异议，限于该请求要求出示受律师—委托人特权及律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件及信息的范围。在不放弃且受制于上述异议的前提下，如经善意搜索后发现任何不受特权保护的回应性文件，将予以出示。\n\n3. 关于与债务人、债务人财产、债务人家庭成员、关联实体或关联个人有关的任何资产负债表、银行对账单、账户对账单、财务报表、账户报表、电汇指示及／或确认、资金证明、存款证、持有证明、投资组合摘要或类似文件的所有文件，包括但不限于足以显示向前述任何一方进行的所有转让的所有文件。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士（郭女士）就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽、不当繁重，并且要求提供关于非债务人（包括 Guo 女士）资产的信息，该等信息不会被提交。Guo 女士还就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求要求其在确定请求中所列任何资产是否为债务人所有时作出法律结论。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士还援引其对定义术语“债务人家属”和“关联实体”的异议，并反对提交关联实体的银行和财务信息。Guo 女士并不占有、保管或控制\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交 于 11/14/22 11:56:29 登记 第 14 页，共 24 页\n\n可能对本文件提交请求具有响应性的债务人文件，且 Guo 女士既不会查找亦不会提交所请求类型的非债务人文件。\n\n4. 关于债务人作出、与债务人进行或代表债务人作出的任何投资、商业交易或交易的所有文件。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。在不放弃前述异议并受其约束的前提下，如经善意查找后发现任何不享有特权且具有响应性的文件，将予以提交。\n\n5. 与债务人的所有通信，以及与债务人的通信有关、且与任何实体的经营、管理或决策有关的文件，包括但不限于与关联实体的通信。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是“与通信有关的文件”一词含糊且令人困惑。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽且不当繁重，因为其意图要求提交“与债务人的所有通信，以及与债务人的通信有关、且与任何实体的经营、管理或决策有关的文件”，而不论该实体为何、债务人在该实体中的权益为何，以及通信的实质内容为何。Guo 女士还就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士援引其对定义术语“关联实体”的异议。在不放弃前述异议并受其约束的前提下，如经善意查找后发现 Guo 女士与\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交 于 11/14/22 11:56:29 登记 第 15 页，共 24 页\n\n债务人之间关于关联实体经营的不享有特权且具有响应性的通信，将予以提交。\n\n6. 关于向债务人、债务人家属或关联实体作出、由其作出或与其进行的任何转让、投资或其他交易或商业往来的所有文件。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽、不当繁重，并且要求提供关于非债务人（包括 Guo 女士）资产和投资的信息，该等信息不会被提交。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士还援引其对定义术语“债务人家属”和“关联实体”的异议，并反对提交关于债务人在其中不拥有任何所有权权益的任何关联实体所进行的“任何转让、投资或其他交易或商业往来”的文件。Guo 女士不知道在过去四年内存在任何“向债务人作出、由债务人作出或与债务人进行的转让、投资或其他交易或商业往来”，因此 Guo 女士不会徒劳地查找具有响应性的文件。\n\n7. 关于债务人曾占用或使用的任何财产的所有文件，包括但不限于 Lady May；Sherry Netherland Hotel / Condominium；位于 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）Greenwich（格林尼治）373 Taconic Rd. 的住宅物业；位于 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）Greenwich（格林尼治）33 Ferncliff Rd. 的住宅物业；以及位于 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）Wilton（威尔顿）354 Nod Hill Rd. 的住宅物业。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽且不当繁重，因为其：(i) 要求提供关于非债务人（包括 Guo 女士）资产的信息，该等信息不会被提交；以及 (ii) 要求提供与“债务人曾占用或使用的财产”有关的所有\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交 于 11/14/22 11:56:29 登记 第 16 页，共 24 页\n\n文件，而不论文件内容为何。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士还反对提交关于债务人在其中不拥有任何所有权权益的关联实体所拥有资产的文件。鉴于本请求的广泛性，Guo 女士既不会查找亦不会提交按其所提方式对本文件提交请求具有响应性的文件。\n\n8. 关于债务人、债务人家属或关联实体于 2020 年 7 月期间或前后，或在任何其他时间，对原油期货或任何类似商品所作的任何投资或交易的所有文件，包括但不限于就任何该等投资或交易与 Jiang Yunfu Be（江云富贝）的通信。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽、不当繁重，并且要求提供关于非债务人（包括 Guo 女士）投资或交易的信息，该等信息不会被提交。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士还援引其对定义术语“债务人家属”和“关联实体”的异议，并反对提交关于债务人在其中不拥有任何所有权权益的关联实体所进行的商品交易（如有）的文件。Guo 女士不知道债务人曾进行任何“于 2020 年 7 月期间或前后，或在任何其他时间，对原油期货或任何类似商品的交易，包括但不限于与 Jiang Yunfu Be 的通信”，且 Guo 女士不会徒劳地查找具有响应性的文件。\n\n9. 关于债务人拥有、控制或使用的任何飞机的所有文件，包括但不限于尾号为 T7-GQM 的飞机及在 San Marino（圣马力诺）登记的任何其他飞机，包括但不限于所有登记文件副本和显示该等飞机所执行航班及该等航班上人员的飞行舱单。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求要求其在确定任何飞机是否由债务人“拥有”或“控制”时作出法律结论。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。在不放弃前述异议并受其约束的前提下，如经善意查找后发现与债务人使用或拥有任何“飞机……包括……尾号为 T7-GQM 的飞机及在 Republic of San Marino（圣马力诺共和国）登记的任何其他飞机”有关的不享有特权且具有响应性的文件，将予以提交。\n\n10. 关于向债务人、债务人财产、债务人家属或关联实体提供、由其提供或代表其提供的任何赠与、利益或贷款的所有文件，包括但不限于足以显示该等赠与、利益或贷款的金额；该等赠与、利益或贷款的用途；提供该等赠与、利益或贷款的时间；以及任何贷款的条款、与任何贷款有关的所有陈述和保证、任何贷款的利率以及任何贷款付款的所有证据的文件。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽、不当繁重，并且要求提供按其所提方式由非债务人（包括完全无关的第三方金融机构）向非债务人（包括 Guo 女士）作出或给予的“赠与、利益或贷款”的信息，该等信息不会被提交。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士还援引其对定义术语“债务人家属”和“关联实体”的异议。Guo 女士既不会查找亦不会提交按其所提方式对本文件提交请求具有响应性的文件。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 1090-2 于 11/14/22 提交 于 11/14/22 11:56:29 登记 第 18 页，共 24 页\n\n11. 关于由债务人、代表债务人或为债务人、债务人财产、债务人家属或关联实体的利益而设立的任何信托或类似工具的所有文件，包括但不限于足以显示信托设立时间、设立人、为谁的利益而设立以及信托本金的文件。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽、不当繁重，并且要求提供关于非债务人为非债务人（包括 Guo 女士）的利益而设立的“信托或类似工具”的信息。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士还援引其对定义术语“债务人家属”和“关联实体”的异议。Guo 女士既不会查找亦不会提交按其所提方式对本文件提交请求具有响应性的文件。\n\n12. 关于与涉及债务人的任何法律争议有关的任何义务、请求权、责任或债务的所有文件，包括但不限于与在任何地方、州、联邦或国际机构（无论是行政机构、法院、合议庭还是替代性争议解决实体）前进行的任何诉讼有关的文件。\n\n异议及答复：Guo 女士就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽且不当繁重，因为其要求提供“与涉及债务人的任何法律争议有关的任何义务、请求权、责任或债务的所有文件，……”，而不论文件内容为何。Guo 女士还就本文件提交请求提出异议，理由是该请求寻求公开可获得的文件。Guo 女士进一步就本文件提交请求提出异议，限于该请求要求提交受律师—委托人特权和律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件和信息的范围。Guo 女士既不会查找亦不会提交按其所提方式对本文件提交请求具有响应性的文件。\n\n13. 您的任何外部律师或其他顾问与债务人之间的所有文件和通信。\n\n异议及答复：Mei Guo（郭美）女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽且造成不当负担，因为其要求提供“您的任何外部律师或其他顾问与债务人之间的所有文件和通信”，而不论该文件或通信的内容为何。郭女士进一步就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是该请求要求提供受律师—当事人保密特权（包括共同利益特权）及律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件、通信和信息。郭女士既不会检索，也不会提供对按所提出的本文件提供请求具有回应性的文件。\n\n14. 足以表明您的全部资产以及收入或资金来源的文件。\n\n异议及答复：郭女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是尽管郭女士并非债务人，该请求仍试图要求郭女士提供足以表明“[她的]全部资产以及收入或资金来源”的文件。受托人无权通过本文件提供请求取得其所寻求的信息，郭女士无需提供所请求的文件，且郭女士既不会检索，也不会提供对本文件提供请求具有回应性的文件。\n\n15. 对于在对第14项请求的答复中确认的、价值超过$50,000的所有资产，提供：(i) 与您取得该等资产有关的所有文件，以及(ii) 与债务人或债务人家属就该等资产进行的通信。\n\n异议及答复：见对编号为14的文件提供请求的异议及答复。\n\n16. 您的纳税申报表副本。\n\n异议及答复：郭女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是尽管郭女士并非债务人，该请求仍试图要求郭女士提供其个人纳税申报表。受托人无权通过本文件提供请求取得其所寻求的信息，郭女士无需提供其个人纳税申报表，且郭女士既不会检索，也不会提供对本文件提供请求具有回应性的文件。\n\n17. 足以表明您占有或控制的所有银行账户和投资账户的文件，包括每一该等账户的余额以及向该等账户转入和从该等账户转出的款项。\n\n异议及答复：郭女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是尽管郭女士并非债务人，该请求仍试图要求郭女士提供足以表明“其占有或控制的所有银行账户和投资账户”的文件，即郭女士的个人账户。受托人无权通过本文件提供请求取得其所寻求的信息，郭女士无需提供所请求的文件，且郭女士既不会检索，也不会提供对本文件提供请求具有回应性的文件。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 1090-2 提交日期 11/14/22 登记日期 11/14/22 11:56:29 第 21 页，共 24 页\n\n18. 与您使用的任何信用卡有关的所有文件，包括但不限于月度对账单或足以表明为债务人或关联实体利益而进行的与此相关的所有购买的其他文件。\n\n异议及答复：郭女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽且造成不当负担，因为其试图要求郭女士提供与其使用过的任何信用卡有关的所有文件，包括其个人信用卡以及其使用任何信用卡进行的任何购买。郭女士并非债务人。受托人无权通过本文件提供请求取得其所寻求的信息，郭女士无需提供所请求的文件，且郭女士既不会检索，也不会提供对本文件提供请求具有回应性的文件。\n\n19. 所有公司治理和组织文件，包括但不限于公司章程细则、公司设立证书以及足以表明您的公司结构、高级管理人员和董事姓名、经营宗旨，以及与债务人或债务人任何家属之间关系的其他文件。\n\n异议及答复：郭女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是该请求不适用于作为自然人的她。\n\n20. 与您持有或曾持有权益的任何关联实体有关的所有文件。\n\n异议及答复：郭女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是该请求试图要求郭女士提供与“[她]持有或曾持有权益的任何关联实体”有关的所有文件。郭女士并非债务人。受托人无权通过本文件提供请求取得其所寻求的信息，且郭女士无需提供所请求的文件。郭女士进一步就本文件提供请求提出异议，\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 1090-2 提交日期 11/14/22 登记日期 11/14/22 11:56:29 第 22 页，共 24 页\n\n理由是该请求要求提供受律师—当事人保密特权（包括共同利益特权）及律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件、通信和信息。在不放弃前述异议的前提下，郭女士将提供与HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC（“HK”）有关的、不受特权保护且具有回应性的文件，因为与HK有关的问题已在一项相关对抗性程序中进行诉讼。\n\n21. 与债务人进行的所有通信，以及与债务人进行的、涉及任何法人实体（包括但不限于关联实体）的运营、管理或决策的通信有关的文件。\n\n异议及答复：郭女士就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是“与通信有关的文件”一语含义模糊且易造成混淆。郭女士进一步就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是该请求范围过宽且造成不当负担，因为其试图要求郭女士提供与债务人进行的所有“通信，以及与债务人进行的、涉及任何法人实体的运营、管理或决策的通信有关的文件”，而不论该实体为何，亦不论通信内容为何。郭女士还就本文件提供请求提出异议，理由是该请求要求提供受律师—当事人保密特权（包括共同利益特权）及律师工作成果原则保护而免于披露的文件、通信和信息。在不放弃前述异议的前提下，郭女士将提供与HK有关的、不受特权保护且具有回应性的文件，因为与HK有关的问题已在一项相关对抗性程序中进行诉讼。\n\n于2022年9月2日订立于康涅狄格州布里奇波特。\n非当事人，MEI GUO（郭美）\n\n/s/ James M. Moriarty\nEric Henzy（ct12849）\nStephen M. Kindseth（ct14640）\nAaron A. Romney（ct28144）\nJames M. Moriarty（ct21876）\nJohn L. Cesaroni（ct29309）\n10 Middle Street, 15th Floor\nBridgeport, Connecticut 06604\n电话：(203) 368-4234\n传真：(203) 368-5487\n电子邮件：[ehenzy@zeislaw.com] [skindseth@zeislaw.com] [aromney@zeislaw.com] [jmoriarty@zeislaw.com] [jcesaroni@zeislaw.com]\n\n送达证明\n\n下列签署人特此证明，前述非当事人Mei Guo（郭美）女士就于2022年8月19日向郭女士送达的、随《规则2004审查传票》一并送达的第11章受托人文件提供请求所作的答复及异议副本，已于2022年9月2日通过电子邮件向下列第11章受托人的登记代理律师送达：\n\nDouglas E. Barron：[douglassbarron@paulhastings.com;] Nicholas Bassett：[nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com;] Avi E. Luft：[aviluft@paulhastings.com;] Patrick Linsey [plinsey@npmlaw.com.]\n\nJames M. Moriarty\nJames M. Moriarty（ct21876）","key_entities":["Guo","Je","Kwok","Himalaya","Ho Wan Kwok","Miles Guo","Yanping Wang","William Je","GTV","Saraca","Himalaya Exchange","GETTR"],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":6749,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-11-14 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-11-14","updated_at":"2026-08-23 19:49:19"}