{"id":"court_ctb_1303_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":1303,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2022-09-21","title":"| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x      |                         |","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x      |                         |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|\n| In re:                                                      | :<br>: | Chapter 11              |\n|                                                             | :      |                         |\n| 1<br>HO WAN KWOK,<br>et al.,                                | :<br>: | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |\n| Debtors.                                                    | :      | (Jointly Administered)  |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | :<br>x |                         |\n|                                                             |        |                         |\n\n## **MOTION OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE FOR ENTRY OF ORDER COMPELLING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. TO COMPLY WITH RULE 2004 SUBPOENA**\n\nLuc A. Despins, in his capacity as the chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in the Ho Wan Kwok's (the \"Individual Debtor\") chapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\"), hereby files this motion (the \"Motion to Compel\") for entry of an order, substantially in the form attached hereto (the \"Proposed Order\"), pursuant to Rules 26 and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the \"Federal Rules\"), and Rules 2004 and 9016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the \"Bankruptcy Rules\") compelling JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (the \"Defaulting Respondent\") to comply with this Court's *Order Granting First Supplemental Omnibus Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee for Entry of Order Under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 and Local Rule 2004-1 Authorizing Discovery with Respect to Additional Legal and Financial Advisors to the Debtor, Entities and Individuals Affiliates with the Debtor, and Relevant Banks* dated September 21, 2022 (ECF No. 866, the \"Rule 2004 Order\") and with the Trustee's Subpoena of the Defaulting Respondent issued\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\npursuant to such order. In support of the Motion to Compel, the Trustee respectfully states as follows:\n\n## **FACTUAL BACKGROUND**\n\n## **I. Trustee's Rule 2004 Motions, Orders, and Subpoenas**\n\n1. On September 7, 2021, the Trustee filed his First Supplemental Omnibus Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee for Entry of Order Under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 and Local Rule 2004-1 Authorizing Discovery with Respect to Additional Legal and Financial Advisors to the Debtor, Entities and Individuals Affiliates with the Debtor, and Relevant Banks (the \"First Omnibus 2004 Motion\") seeking discovery with respect to various legal and financial advisors to the Individual Debtor, persons affiliated with the Individual Debtor, and, as relevant here, banks at which the Individual Debtor and persons and entities related to the Individual Debtor are believed to have deposited funds or conducted financial transactions.\n\n2. Among these banks was the Defaulting Respondent. In particular, the Trustee has reason to believe that the Individual Debtor and that debtor Genever Holdings LLC (\"Genever (U.S.)\") held accounts at the Defaulting Respondent. For this, among other reasons, the Defaulting Respondent is highly likely to possess documents relevant to the Individual Debtor's assets and financial affairs.\n\n3. The Defaulting Respondent did not object to the First Omnibus 2004 Motion. The First Omnibus 2004 Motion was granted by entry of the Rule 2004 Order on September 21, 2022.\n\n4. On September 26, 2022, pursuant to the Rule 2004 Order, the Trustee served the Defaulting Respondent with a Subpoena for Rule 2004 Examination with appended Request for Production of Documents (collectively, the \"Chase Subpoena\"). A true and accurate copy of the\n\nChase Subpoena is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Chase Subpoena required compliance on or before October 24, 2022.\n\n5. The Defaulting Respondent did not object to compliance with the Chase Subpoena. Instead, the Defaulting Respondent contacted the Trustee by telephone messages to its counsel on October 12 and 19, 2022, to request information concerning the persons and entities relevant to discovery in the Chase Subpoena.\n\n6. To assist the Defaulting Respondent in complying with the Rule 2004 Order, the Trustee compiled information to assist the Defaulting Respondent in performing searches with respect to the Chase Subpoena. Counsel for the Trustee contacted the Defaulting Respondent, by telephone and by email, including on October 19, 2022, November 15, 2022, and November 16, 2022, to request a telephone conference to provide this information and to otherwise discuss the Defaulting Respondent's compliance with the Chase Subpoena.\n\n7. On November 18, 2022, the Trustee's counsel again requested by email to meetand-confer with the Defaulting Respondent and warned the Defaulting Respondent that continued failure to respond would require the Trustee to file a motion to enforce compliance with the Chase Subpoena and reserved the right to seek appropriate sanctions under such circumstances.\n\n8. The Defaulting Respondent failed and refused to respond to the foregoing correspondence. Hence this Motion to Compel.\n\n## **JURISDICTION AND VENUE**\n\n9. The Court has jurisdiction to consider this matter under 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. Venue is proper in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. This is a core proceeding pursuant to, *inter alia*, 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) (A), (E), and (O).\n\n## **RELIEF REQUESTED**\n\n10. The Trustee seeks entry of the Proposed Order compelling the Defaulting Respondent to comply with the Chase Subpoena holding the Defaulting Respondent in civil contempt for failing to do so to date.\n\n## **BASIS FOR RELIEF**\n\n## **I. The Defaulting Respondent Must Comply with the Chase Subpoena**\n\n11. The Trustee is tasked with investigating the Individual Debtor's assets and affairs for the benefit of the Individual Debtor's creditors. \"The purpose of a Rule 2004 examination is to assist a party in interest in determining the nature and extent of the bankruptcy estate, revealing assets, examining transactions and assessing whether wrongdoing has occurred.\" *In re Transmar Commodity Grp. Ltd.*, Case No. 16-13625-JLG, 2018 WL 4006324, at \\*4 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (internal quotation and citation omitted). This includes revealing the nature and extent of the estate and in discovering assets of the debtor that may have been intentionally or unintentionally concealed. *In re Bennett Funding Grp., Inc.*, 203 B.R. 24, 27-28 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1996); *see also In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC*, 562 B.R. 614, 626 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016) (\"Legitimate goals of Rule 2004 examinations include discovering assets, examining transactions, and determining whether wrongdoing has occurred.\") (internal quotation and citation omitted)); *id.* (noting that \"[u]nlike traditional discovery, which narrowly focuses on the issues germane to the dispute, the scope of Rule 2004 is broad and unfettered, and has been likened to a fishing expedition and an inquisition\") (internal citations and punctuation omitted); Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004(b) (authorizing scope of 2004 examinations \"relat[ing] . . . to . . . property . . . and financial condition of the debtor, or to *any matter* which may affect the administration of the debtor's estate\") (emphasis added).\n\n12. The Trustee reasonably believes that the Defaulting Respondent has records relevant to the Trustee's investigation, including, among other things, with respect to accounts held by the Individual Debtor and by Genever U.S. Accordingly, the Trustee obtained the Rule 2004 Order and served the Defaulting Respondent with the Rule 2004 Order. The Defaulting Respondent has no cause to ignore or refuse compliance with the Chase Subpoena. The Court should thus compel the Defaulting Respondent's compliance with the Chase Subpoena.\n\n## **II. The Defaulting Respondent Should be Held in Civil Contempt**\n\n13. Rule 45(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that \"[f]ailure by any person without adequate excuse to obey a subpoena served upon that person may be deemed a contempt of the court from which the subpoena issued.\" *In re Corso*, 328 B.R. 375, 385 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (quoting FRCP 45(e)) (quotations omitted); *PaineWebber Inc. v. Acstar Ins. Co.*, 211 F.R.D. 247, 249 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (\"Where a party fails to object to a subpoena and also fails to comply, it may be held in contempt, pursuant to Rule 45[(e)]\") (internal quotations omitted).\n\n14. To hold a party in civil contempt, \"the court need only (1) have entered a clear and unambiguous order, (2) find it established by clear and convincing evidence that the order was not complied with, and (3) find that the alleged contemnor has not clearly established his inability to comply with the terms of the order.\" *Huber v. Marine Midland Bank*, 51 F.3d 5, 10 (2d Cir. 1995) (*citing N.A. Sales Co. v. Chapman Indus. Corp.*, 736 F.2d 854, 857 (2d Cir. 1984)).\n\n15. In a civil contempt proceeding, a finding of contempt will be upheld so long as the order violated \"is clear and unambiguous, the proof of non-compliance [with the order] is clear and convincing, and the contemnor was not reasonably diligent in attempting to comply.\" *Corso*, 328 B.R. at 385 (quoting *United States v. Local 1804–1, Int'l Longshoremen's Assn.*, 44 F.3d 1091, 1096 (2d Cir.1995) (quotations omitted) (alterations in original)).\n\n16. Additionally, a party that fails to timely respond or object to a subpoena within the mandated period is not permitted to raise objections at a later time. *See Corso*, 328 B.R. at 384-85 (\"Because [the subpoenaed party] did not raise any timely objections to the Trustee's subpoena, or move to quash it in a timely manner [it] waived its right to object to the Subpoena.\").\n\n17. Finally, courts have found that a party that fails to respond or object to a subpoena may be sanctioned for that failure. *See PaineWebber Inc.*, 211 F.R.D. at 249 (\"Where a party fails to object to a subpoena and also fails to comply, it may be held in contempt, pursuant to Rule 45[(e)], **and sanctions may therefore be imposed**.\") (internal quotations omitted and emphasis added); *Corso*, 328 B.R. at 385-86 (upholding bankruptcy court's sanction of a party which made \"no effort\" to comply with a Rule 2004 subpoena). Specifically, courts in the Second Circuit have awarded attorneys' fees where a party fails to comply with a subpoena. *See Gucci Am., Inc. v. Li*, No. 10-CV-4974 (RJS), 2015 WL 7758872, at \\*4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2015) (\"[C]ourts in this Circuit have awarded attorneys' fees where a party or a non-party willfully fails to comply with a subpoena.\").\n\n18. Here, service of the document request attached to the Chase Subpoena has occurred, and, despite its awareness of the Chase Subpoena, the Defaulting Respondent has not made any effort to comply with the Chase Subpoena. *See id.* (affirming bankruptcy court's Contempt Order where service of subpoena was clear and unambiguous and no effort was made to comply).\n\n19. Indeed, after the Defaulting Respondent requested that the Trustee provide additional information concerning the searches required under the Chase Subpoena, and after the Trustee cooperated to compile such information, the Defaulting Respondent ceased responding to the Trustee's communications altogether.\n\n20. Accordingly, the Court should issue an order (i) holding the Defaulting Respondent in civil contempt of Court, (ii) preventing the Defaulting Respondent from raising any objections to the Chase Subpoena, and (iii) ordering the Defaulting Respondent to pay the Trustee's attorneys' fees related to this motion.\n\n## **NO PRIOR REQUEST**\n\n21. The Trustee has not previously sought the relief requested herein from this or any other court.\n\n## **CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL**\n\n22. As set forth above, and in the Declaration of Patrick R. Linsey filed herewith, counsel for the Trustee has sought on numerous occasions to confer with the Noncompliant Respondent in good faith in an effort to resolve this dispute and counsel for the Noncompliant Respondent has failed or refused to respond.\n\nWHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Trustee respectfully requests entry of the Proposed Order granting the relief requested in this Motion to Compel and such other relief as is just and proper.\n\nDated: January 6, 2022 LUC A. DESPINS,\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: /s/Douglas S. Skalka Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 821-2000 dskalka@npmlaw.com plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x           |                         |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-------------------------|\n| In re:                                                      | :<br>:      | Chapter 11              |\n| 2<br>HO WAN KWOK,<br>et al.,                                | :<br>:      | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |\n| Debtors.                                                    | :<br>:<br>: | (Jointly Administered)  |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x           |                         |\n\n## **DECLARATION OF PATRICK R. LINSEY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE FOR ENTRY OF ORDER COMPELLING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. TO COMPLY WITH RULE 2004 SUBPOENA**\n\nI, Patrick R. Linsey, declare:\n\n1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of Connecticut and an associate at the law firm of Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C., and counsel for Luc A. Despins as Chapter 11 Trustee (the \"Trustee\"). I respectfully submit this declaration in support of the *Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee for Entry of Order Compelling JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. to Comply with Rule 2004 Subpoenas* (the \"Motion\").\n\n2. I have requested to meet-and-confer with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (the \"Defaulting Respondent\") with respect to the issues addressed in the Motion on numerous occasions, including, without limitation, on November 16, 2022. The Defaulting Respondent has failed or refused to respond to these requests to meet-and-confer.\n\n<sup>2</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nPursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, and after reasonable inquiry, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.\n\nDated: January 6, 2023\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut Respectfully submitted,\n\nBy: */s/ Patrick R. Linsey* Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n# EXHIBIT A\n\nB2540 (Form 2540 – Subpoena for Rule 2004 Examination) (12/15) Case 22-50073 Doc 1303 Filed 01/06/23 Entered 01/06/23 16:10:41 Page 11 of 35\n\n## UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ District of \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ Connecticut\n\nIn re \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nCase No. \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ Ho Wan Kwok 22-50073\n\nDebtor\n\nChapter \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ 11\n\n## **SUBPOENA FOR RULE 2004 EXAMINATION**\n\nTo: **\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_** JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.\n\n*(Name of person to whom the subpoena is directed)*\n\n *Testimony:* **YOU ARE COMMANDED** to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at an examination under Rule 2004, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. A copy of the court order authorizing the examination is attached. X\n\n| PLACE                                                         | DATE AND TIME                         |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|\n| NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.                                | October 24, 2022, 10 A.M.             |\n| 195 Church Street, 13th Floor<br>New Haven, Connecticut 06510 | (see attached Bankruptcy Court Order) |\n\nThe examination will be recorded by this method: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ court reporter/stenographer\n\n *Production:* You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the examination the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and must permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material: X\n\n### See Requests for Production of Documents, attached hereto.\n\nThe following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, made applicable in bankruptcy cases by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9016, are attached – Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance; Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and 45(g), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so.\n\nDate: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ September 22, 2022\n\nCLERK OF COURT\n\nOR\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ *Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk* \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ *Attorney's signature* Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437)\n\nThe name, address, email address, and telephone number of the attorney representing *(name of party)* \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ , who issues or requests this subpoena, are: Luc Despins, Ch. 11 Trustee\n\nPatrick R. Linsey, Esq.; Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.; 195 Church Street, 13th Floor, New Haven, Connecticut 06510 plinsey@npmlaw.com; (203) 821-2000\n\n## **Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena**\n\nIf this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or the inspection of premises before trial, a notice and a copy of this subpoena must be served on each party before it is served on the person to whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).\n\n## **Request for Production of Documents**\n\n## **I. INSTRUCTIONS**\n\n1. Unless otherwise indicated, the requests for documents set forth below, (the \"Requests,\" and each, a \"Request\"), must be responded to separately and specifically. Each Request shall be answered fully unless it is in good faith objected to, in which event the reason for Your objection shall be stated in detail, as set forth below. If an objection pertains only to a portion of a Request, or a word, phrase or clause contained within it, You are required to state Your objection to that portion only and to respond to the remainder of the Requests.\n\n2. Electronically stored information must be produced in accordance with the\n\nfollowing instructions:\n\n- a. Images. Black and white images must be 300 DPI Group IV single-page TIFF files. Color images must be produced in JPEG format. File names cannot contain embedded spaces or special characters (including the comma). Folder names cannot contain embedded spaces or special characters (including the comma). All TIFF image files must have a unique file name, i.e. Bates number. Images must be endorsed with sequential Bates numbers in the lower right corner of each image. The number of TIFF files per folder should not exceed 1000 files. Excel spreadsheets should have a placeholder image named by the Bates number of the file.\n- b. Image Load File\n\t- a. Concordance® Data File. The data file (.DAT) contains all of the fielded information that will be loaded into the Concordance® database. The first line of the .DAT file must be a header row identifying the field names. The .DAT file must use the following Concordance® default delimiters: Comma ASCII character (020) Quote þ ASCII character (254). Date fields should be provided in the format: mm/dd/yyyy. Date and time fields must be two separate fields. If documents includes imaged emails and attachments, the attachment fields must be included to preserve the parent/child relationship between an email and its attachments. An OCRPATH field must be included to provide the file path and name of the extracted text file on the produced storage media. The text file must be named after the FIRSTBATES. Do not include the text in the .DAT file. For Documents with native files, a LINK field must be included to provide the file path and\n\nname of the native file. The native file must be named after the FIRSTBATES.\n\n- b. Concordance Image® OR Opticon Cross-Reference File. The image crossreference file (.LOG or .OPT) links the images to the database records. It should be a comma-delimited file consisting of seven fields per line with a line in the cross-reference file for every image in the database with the following format: ImageID,VolumeLabel,ImageFilePath,DocumentBreak,FolderBreak,Box Break,PageCoun.\n- c. Document Text. Text must be produced as separate text files, not as fields within the .DAT file. The full path to the text file (OCRPATH) should be included in the .DAT file. It is recommended document level ANSI text files, named per the FIRSTBATES/Image Key. Extracted text files must be in a separate folder, and the number of text files per folder should not exceed 1,000 files. There should be no special characters (including commas in the folder names). Text files must be provided on a document level.\n- d. Native Production for Certain File Types. File types that reasonably require viewing in their native format for a full understanding of their content and meaning must be produced in native format. These include, but are not limited to, spreadsheets, spreadsheet-like files (Microsoft Excel, comma separated values, tab separated values, etc.), Microsoft PowerPoint or other special presentation files, database files, and audio/visual files. Provide an image of a Bates numbered slip sheet indicating the presence of a native file, and include the path to the native as a field in the .dat file. Name the produced native file with the Bates number corresponding to the slip sheet for the file. Group native files within incrementally named \"NATIVE\" directories, separate from images directories.\n- e. De-duplication. Produce a single copy of each electronic document for which exact duplicates exist. For email messages, consolidate duplicates based on MD5 hash generated from the BCC, Body, CC, From, IntMsgID, To, and Attach properties. For email attachments and standalone electronic files, consolidate duplicates based on MD5 hash of the entire file.\n- f. Metadata. Produce extracted metadata for each document in the form of a Concordance compliant load file (.dat). The first line of the .DAT file must be a header row identifying the field names. The .DAT file must use the following Concordance default delimiters: Comma , ASCII character (020) Quote þ ASCII character (254)\n\nDate fields should be provided in the format: mm/dd/yyyy. Date and time fields must be two separate fields. Required metadata listed below:\n\n| Field Name   | Sample Data              | Description                                      |\n|--------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|\n| FIRSTBATES   | EDC0000001               | First Bates number of native file document/email |\n| LASTBATES    | EDC0000001               | Last Bates number of native file document/email  |\n|              |                          | **The LASTBATES field should be populated        |\n|              |                          | for single page                                  |\n| ATTACHRANGE  | EDC0000001<br>-          | Bates number of the first page of the parent     |\n|              | EDC0000015               | document to the Bates number of the last page of |\n|              |                          | the last attachment \"child\" document             |\n| BEGATTACH    | EDC0000001               | First Bates number of attachment range           |\n| ENDATTACH    | EDC0000015               | Last Bates number of attachment range            |\n| CUSTODIAN    | Smith, John              | Email: Mailbox where the email resided           |\n|              |                          | Native: Name of the individual or department     |\n|              |                          | from whose files the document<br>originated      |\n| FROM         | John Smith               | Email: Sender                                    |\n|              |                          | Native: Author(s) of document                    |\n|              |                          | **semi-colon should be used to separate          |\n|              |                          | multiple entries                                 |\n| TO           | Coffman, Janice; LeeW    | Recipient(s)                                     |\n|              | [mailto:LeeW@MSN.com]    | **semi-colon should be used to separate multiple |\n|              |                          | entries                                          |\n| CC           | Frank Thompson [mailto:  | Carbon copy recipient(s)                         |\n|              | frank_Thompson@cdt.com]  | **semi-colon should be used to separate          |\n|              |                          | multiple entries                                 |\n| BCC          | John Cain                | Blind carbon copy recipient(s)                   |\n|              |                          | **semi-colon should be used to separate          |\n|              |                          | multiple entries                                 |\n| SUBJECT      | Board Meeting Minutes    | Email: Subject line of the email Native: Title   |\n|              |                          | of document (if available)                       |\n| FILE_NAME    | BoardMeetingMinutes.docx | Native: Name of the original native file,        |\n|              |                          | including extension                              |\n| DATE_SENT    | 10/12/2010               | Email: Date the email was sent                   |\n|              |                          | Native: (empty)                                  |\n| TIME_SENT/   | 07:05 PM GMT             | Email: Time the email was sent/ Time zone in     |\n| TIME_ZONE    |                          | which the emails were standardized               |\n| TIME_ZONE    | GMT                      | The<br>time zone in which<br>the emails<br>were  |\n|              |                          | standardized during conversion.                  |\n| LINK         |  EDC0000001.msg   | Hyperlink to the email or native file document   |\n|              |                          | **The linked file must be named per the          |\n|              |                          | FIRSTBATES number                                |\n| FILE_EXTEN   | MSG                      | The file type extension                          |\n|              |                          | representing                                     |\n|              |                          | the Email or                                     |\n| AUTHOR       | John Smith               | Email: (empty)                                   |\n|              |                          | Native: Author of the document                   |\n| DATE_CREATED | 10/10/2010               | Email: (empty)                                   |\n|              |                          | Native: Date the document was created            |\n\n| TIME_CREATED | 10:25 AM                  | Email: (empty)                                  |\n|--------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|\n|              |                           | Native: Time the document was created           |\n|              |                           | **This data must be a separate field and cannot |\n|              |                           | be combined with the DATE_CREATED field         |\n| DATE_MOD     | 10/12/2010                | Email: (empty)                                  |\n|              |                           | Native: Date the document was last modified     |\n| TIME_MOD     | 07:00 PM                  | Email: (empty)                                  |\n|              |                           | Native: Time the document was last modified     |\n|              |                           | **This data must be a separate field and cannot |\n|              |                           | be combined with the DATE_MOD field             |\n| DATE_ACCESSD | 10/12/2010                | Email: (empty)                                  |\n|              |                           | Native: Date the document was last accessed     |\n| TIME_ACCESSD | 07:00 PM                  | Email: (empty)                                  |\n|              |                           | Native: Time the document was last accessed     |\n|              |                           | **This data must be a separate field and cannot |\n|              |                           | be combined with the DATE_ACCESSD field         |\n| FILE_SIZE    | 5,952                     | Size of native file<br>document/email in KB     |\n| PGCOUNT      | 1                         | Number of pages in native file document/email   |\n| PATH         |   | Email: (empty)                                  |\n|              | Agenda.doc                | Native: Path where native file document was     |\n|              |                           | stored including original file name.            |\n| INTFILEPATH  | Personal Folders\\Deleted  | Email: original location of email including     |\n|              | Items\\Board Meeting       | original file name.                             |\n|              | Minutes.msg               | Native: (empty)                                 |\n| INTMSGID     | <000805c2c71b\\$75977050\\$ | Email: Unique Message ID Native: (empty)        |\n|              | cb8306d1@MSN>             |                                                 |\n| MD5HASH      | d131dd02c5e6eec4693d9a0   | MD5 Hash value of the document.                 |\n|              | 698aff95c                 |                                                 |\n|              | 2fcab58712467eab4004583e  |                                                 |\n|              | b8fb7f89                  |                                                 |\n| OCRPATH      | TEXT/001/EDC0000001.txt   | Path to extracted text of the native file       |\n\n3. Each Request operates and should be construed independently and, unless otherwise indicated, no Request limits the scope of any other Request.\n\n4. All Documents are to be produced as kept in the usual course of business or are to be organized and labeled to correspond with the categories in these Requests.\n\n5. Each Request contained herein extends to all Documents: (a) in Your possession, custody, or control; or (b) in the possession, custody, or control of anyone acting on Your behalf, including Your counsel or other representatives and advisors. Each Document shall be produced in its entirety.\n\n6. If You are requested to produce a Document that is no longer in Your possession, custody, or control, then Your response must (a) describe in detail the nature of the document and its contents; (b) identify the person(s) who prepared or authored the Document (and, if applicable, the Person(s) to whom the Document was sent); (c) identify the date on which the document was prepared or created; (d) state whether such Document (i) is missing or lost, (ii) has been destroyed, (iii) has been transferred, voluntarily or involuntarily, to others, or (iv) was otherwise disposed of; (e) state the reason for, and the facts and circumstances surrounding, such disposition; (f) identify the Persons who authorized such disposition; (g) identify the date or approximate date of such disposition; (h) state when the Document was most recently in Your possession, custody or control; and (i) identify the Person, if any, presently in possession, custody, or control of such Document.\n\n7. If You are requested to produce a Document that has been destroyed, then Your response must state, in addition to the information required by the preceding Instruction: (a) the reason for the Document's destruction; (b) the identity of the Person who destroyed the Document; and (c) the identity of the Person who directed that the Document be destroyed.\n\n8. If You claim that a requested Document is privileged or attorney work-product, then Your response must: (a) state (i) a description of the Document adequate to support Your contention that the Document is privileged, (ii) the title of the Document, (iii) the date of the Document, (iv) the author of the Document, (v) the addressee of the Document, (vi) the identity of each Person who received or saw the original or any draft, copy, or reproduction of the Document, (vii) whether the Document itself, or any information contained or referred to in the Document is in the possession, custody, or control of any other Persons, and if so, the identity of such Persons, as well as a statement addressing how the information came into their possession, (viii) the claim of privilege under which the Document is withheld, and (ix) all of the circumstances upon which You will rely to support such claim of privilege; and (b) produce a privilege log containing all of the information requested in Part (a) of this Instruction for each Document withheld on the basis of a claim of privilege in accordance with D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e). For any part of a Document Request as to which a claim of privilege or work product is not made, responsive documents should be provided in full.\n\n9. If a portion of an otherwise responsive Document contains information subject to a claim of privilege, only that portion of the Document subject to the claim of privilege shall be deleted or redacted from the Document following the instructions above, and the rest shall be produced.\n\n10. The Requests are continuing in nature. You are hereby instructed to (a) supplement or correct any responses later learned to be incomplete or incorrect immediately upon learning that a prior response was incomplete or incorrect; and (b) produce any additional Documents that are called for under the\n\n11. If a Document is in a language other than English, You should provide that Document. If a Document is in a language other than English, and an English translation exists, You should provide both Documents.\n\n12. All references to Entities includes all affiliates thereof.\n\n13. All references to individual names include all alternative names, aliased, or nicknames.\n\n14. Unless otherwise expressly indicated, the period of time covered by the Document Requests is the period from February 5, 2012 to the date responses to the Document Requests are due.\n\n## **II. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION**\n\n15. The use of (a) any singular noun shall be construed to include the plural, and vice versa, and (b) a verb in any tense shall be construed as the use of the verb in all other tenses.\n\n16. The terms (a) \"and\" and \"or\" shall be construed either conjunctively or disjunctively as necessary to bring within the scope of any request all responses that might otherwise be construed to be outside of its scope, and (b) \"each\" and \"any\" shall be deemed to include and encompass the words \"every\" and \"all.\"\n\n## **III. DEFINITIONS**\n\nThe definitions supplied by D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(c) and the rules of construction supplied by D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(d), as incorporated by D. Conn. Bankr. L.R. 2004-1(a), shall apply to the Document Requests. In addition, the following terms used in these Document Requests shall have the following meanings:\n\n1. \"You\" or \"Your\" or \"Yourself\" means and refers to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., together with any of its affiliates, parents, and subsidiaries, and any of their employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on their behalf.\n\n2. \"Debtor\" means Ho Wan Kwok (a/k/a Miles Kwok, Miles Guo, Guo Wengui, Guo Haoyun, 郭文贵, or any other alias), together with his employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf.\n\n3. \"Debtor's Son\" means Qiang Guo (a/k/a Mileson Kwok, 郭强, or any other alias), together with his employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on his behalf.\n\n4. \"Debtor's Daughter\" means Mei Guo (a/k/a Mei Gui, 郭美, or any other alias), together with her employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on her behalf.\n\n5. \"Debtor's Purported Wife\" means Hing Chi Ngok (a/k/a Hing Chi Ng, Yue Qingzhi, 岳庆芝, or any other alias), together with her employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on her behalf.\n\n6. \"Debtor's Family\" means, individually and collectively, the Debtor, the Debtor's Son, the Debtor's Daughter, and the Debtor's Purported Wife, and any other familial relation to the Debtor.\n\n7. \"2004 Discovery Targets\" means, individually and collectively, the Debtor, the Debtor's Family, ACA Capital Group Limited, Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd., Himalaya International Clearing Ltd., Himalaya International Payments Ltd., Himalaya International Reserves Ltd., Jesse Brown, William Je, William Je, Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited LLC, Bravo Luck Limited, Golden Spring (New York) Ltd., Lamp Capital LLC, Greenwich Land LLC, Qu Guo Jiao, Daniel Thomas Podhaskie, Yvette Wang, Ace Decade Holdings Limited, Dawn State Limited, Rule of Law Society IV Inc., Rule of Law Foundation III, GTV Media Group, Inc., Voice of Guo Media, Inc., and Saraca Media Group Inc.\n\n8. \"Associated Individuals\" means, individually and collectively, all individuals that (1) hold, control, have custody over, or discretion over assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family; or (2) have been employees, directors, or otherwise are affiliated with one or more Associated Entities, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel,\n\nadvisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of the foregoing. Such Associated Individuals shall include, but are not limited to: Daniel Podhaskie, Jason Miller, Jesse Brown, William Je, Steve Bannon, Karin Maistrello, Melissa Francis, William Gertz, Arethusa Forsyth, Glenn Mellor, Jennifer Mercurio, Eduardo Eurnekian, Han Chunguang (a/k/a 韩春光), Qu Guojiao (a/k/a Qu Guo Jiao, 屈国姣), Guo Lijie (a/k/a 郭丽杰), Zhang Wei (a/k/a 张伟\\*), Lihong Wei Lafrenz (a/k/a Sara Wei, 魏丽红), Hao Haidong (a/k/a 郝海东), Ross Heinemeyer, Max Krasner, Kyle Bass, Melissa Mendez, Ya Li (a/k/a 李娅), Dinggang Wang (a/k/a 王定刚), An Hong (a/k/a 安红), Yvette Wang (a/k/a Yanping Wang, Yan Ping Wang, 王雁平), Fiona Yu, Je Kin Ming (a/k/a William Je, Yu Jianming, 余建明), Yaz Qingua, and Lao Jiang (a/k/a Jiang Yunfu, Jiang Yunfu Be, 姜云浮).\n\n9. \"Associated Entities\" means, individually and collectively, all organizations or Entities of any type that (1) have been owned, controlled, or invested in by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family; or (2) have an interest, whether directly or indirectly, in any assets owned, controlled, or enjoyed by the Debtor or the Debtor's Family, together with the respective employees, agents, counsel, advisors, or anyone acting on behalf of any of the foregoing. Such Associated Entities shall include, but are not limited to: 7 Nod Hill LLC, AAGV Limited, ACA Investment Management Limited, ACA Capital Group Limited, Ace Decade Holdings Limited, AI Group Holdings Inc., Alfa Global Ventures Limited, Alfonso Global Limited, Allied Capital Global Limited, Alpine Fiduciaries SA, Anton Development Limited, Assets Sino Limited, Auspicious Coast Limited, Beijing Pangu Investment Co., Beijing Pangu Investment Co. Ltd., Beijing Pangu Investment Inc., Beijing Zenith Holdings Company Limited, Bravo Luck Limited, BSA Strategic Fund I, China Golden Spring (Hong Kong) Limited, Chuang Xin Limited, Crane Advisory Group LLC, Creative Apex Investments Limited, Crystal Breeze Investments Limited,\n\nDawn State Limited, Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, Elite Well Global Limited, Empire Growth Holdings, G Club Operations LLC, G Fashion LLC, G News LLC, GETTR USA, Genever Holdings Corporation, Genever Holdings LLC, GFASHION MEDIA GROUP INC., GFNY, Inc., Globalist International Limited, GNews Media Group Inc., Golden Spring (New York) Ltd., Greenwich Land LLC, Guo Media, GTV Media Group, Inc., Hamilton Capital Holdings Inc., Head Win Group Limited, Henan Yuda, Himalaya Embassy, Himalaya Exchange, Himalaya Federal Reserve, Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd., Himalaya International Clearing Ltd. , Himalaya International Payments Ltd., Himalaya International Reserves Ltd., Himalaya Supervisory Organization, HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited LLC, Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited, Hudson Diamond NY LLC, Infinite Increase Limited, Infinitum Developments Limited, Insight Phoenix Fund, Lamp Capital LLC, Leading Shine Limited, Leading Shine NY Limited, Long Gate Limited, Next Tycoon Investments Limited, New Federal State of China (a/k/a NFSC), Noble Fame Global Limited, Rosy Acme Ventures Limited, Rule of Law Foundation III, Inc., Rule of Law Foundation IV, Inc., Rule of Law Fund, Rule of Law Society, Rule of Law Society IV, Inc., G-Translators PTY LTD, Saraca Media Group, Inc., Shiny Ace Ltd., Shiny Times Holdings Ltd., Spirit Charter Investment Limited, Stevenson, Wong & Co., TM Primrose Limited, Voice of Guo Media, Inc., Well Origin Ltd., World Century Limited, Worldwide Opportunity Holdings Limited, Whitecroft Shore Limited, and ZIBA Limited.\n\n10. \"Including\" or any variant thereof means \"including without limitation.\"\n\n11. \"And\" and \"or\" mean \"and/or,\" and shall be construed both conjunctively as well as disjunctively in order to maximize their scope.\n\n12. \"Any\" and \"all\" and \"each\" mean \"each and every.\"\n\n13. \"Each\" and \"every\" mean \"each and every.\"\n\n14. \"Third Party\" means a Person or Entity other than Yourself.\n\n15. \"Transfer\" shall have the meaning given to it by section 101(54) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n16. \"Document\" means any information or thing within the scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, and includes, without limitation, each and every written, recorded, or graphic matter of any kind, type, nature, or description that is or has been in Your Possession, Custody or Control, including all printed and electronic copies of electronic mail, computer files maintained in electronic form, correspondence, memoranda, tapes, stenographic or handwritten notes, written forms of any kind, charts, blueprints, drawings, sketches, graphs, plans, articles, specifications, diaries, letters, telegrams, photographs, minutes, contracts, agreements, surveys, computer printouts, data compilations of any kind, telexes, facsimiles, emails, text messages, instant messages, voice messages, invoices, order forms, checks, drafts, statements, credit memos, reports, position reports, summaries, indices, books, ledgers, notebooks, schedules, transparencies, recordings, catalogs, advertisements, promotional materials, films, video tapes, audio tapes, CDs, computer disks, brochures, pamphlets, punch-cards, time-slips, Tweets, social media posts, or any written or recorded materials of any other kind, and all meta-data thereof, however stored (whether in tangible or electronic form), recorded, produced, or reproduced, and also including but not limited to, drafts or copies of any of the foregoing that contain any notes, comments, or markings of any kind not found on the original documents or that are otherwise not identical to the original documents.\n\n17. \"Person(s)\" means an individual, corporation, proprietorship, partnership, association, or any other Entity. \"Person\" also includes any agent, representatives, or expert, including but not limiting to, attorneys or financial advisors.\n\n18. \"Entity\" means any natural Person, corporation, partnership, subsidiary, sole proprietorship, firm, board, joint venture, association, agency, authority, commission or other business entity or juristic Person, as well as any affiliate, agent, parent including but not limited to counsel, financial advisors, or any other representative.\n\n19. \"Regarding\" means concerning, describing, comprising, referring to, related to, supporting, favoring, opposing, bolstering, detracting from, located in, considered in connection with, bearing on, evidencing, indicating, reporting on, recording, alluding to, responding to, connected with, commenting on, in respect of, about, in relation to, discussing, showing, describing, reflecting, analyzing constituting, and being.\n\n20. \"Relating to,\" \"relate(s) to\" or \"related to,\" when referring to any given subject matter, means, without limitation, any document that constitutes, comprises, involves, contains, embodies, reflects, identifies, states, refers directly or indirectly to, or is in any way relevant to the particular subject matter identified.\n\n21. \"Communication(s)\" means, in the broadest possible sense, and without limitation, any transmittal of information or knowledge (in the form of facts, ideas, inquiries, or otherwise). Communication(s) further refers to all conversations, agreements, inquiries, or replies, whether in person, by telephone, in writing, or by means of electronic transmittal devices, and includes, but is not limited to, all correspondence, emails, recordings, transmittal slips, memoranda, telephone communications, voice messages, telegrams, telefaxes, telecopies, telexes, instant messages, chats, text messages, postings to a message board or group chat, social media posts, tweets, videos uploaded to any video platform, telephonic notes, or notes transmitted internally or with third parties.\n\n22. \"Asset(s)\" means any item of economic value that is subject to Possession, Custody, or Control. Asset includes all real and personal property, including but limited to, real estate, land, houses, apartments, condominiums, automobiles, yachts, boats, planes, jets, helicopters, cash, bank accounts, cryptocurrencies, securities, accounts receivables, inventory, and other tangible and intangible property.\n\n## **IV. DOCUMENTS TO BE PRODUCED**\n\n1. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present related to any account held by, controlled by, on behalf of, or otherwise related to any of the 2004 Discovery Targets, including any and all account statements, authorizations, power of attorney, trusts, instructions or forms, copies of cancelled checks, correspondence, and wire transfers and related correspondence and instructions.\n\n2. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present related to any funds, securities, property, or assets belonging to, held by, controlled by, on behalf of, or otherwise related to any of the 2004 Discovery Targets, including any and all account statements, authorizations, powers of attorney, trusts, instructions or forms, copies of cancelled checks, correspondence, and wire transfers and related correspondence and instructions.\n\n3. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present related to any business, commerce or financial transactions, including but not limited to any loan, line of credit, bailment, deposit, swap, securities transactions, mortgage, or ISDA, with any of the 2004 Discovery Targets, including any and all account statements, authorizations, powers of attorney, trusts, instructions or forms, copies of cancelled checks, correspondence, and wire transfers and related correspondence and instructions.\n\n4. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present relating to any wire transfer activity relating to the 2004 Discovery Targets, regardless of the existence of any accounts, including but not limited to all wire transfer receipts, account numbers, balances, authorizations, identification information related to the parties to the transfer, correspondence, instructions, or other records.\n\n5. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present related to any correspondence and communications between you and the 2004 Discovery Targets.\n\n6. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present related to any account with any 2004 Discovery Target relating to opening of the account, authorized users of the account and maintenance of the account.\n\n7. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present related to any antimoney laundering, know-your-customer, or other compliance activity relating to any of the 2004 Discovery Targets, including but not limited to any information provided by any of the 2004 Discovery Targets, or learned by You.\n\n8. All Documents dated between January 1, 2014 and the present relating to any communications with any regulator from any country, including but not limited to the Bank of England, the United States Federal Reserve, the S.E.C., the CFTC, FINRA, China Securities Regulatory Commission, People's Bank of China, Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority relating to any of the 2004 Discovery Targets.\n\n## **Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13) (made applicable in bankruptcy cases by Rule 9016, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure)**\n\n#### **(c) Place of compliance.**\n\n *(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition.* A subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition only as follows:\n\n (A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or\n\n (B) within the state where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person, if the person\n\n(i) is a party or a party's officer; or\n\n (ii) is commanded to attend a trial and would not incur substantial expense.\n\n#### *(2) For Other Discovery.* A subpoena may command:\n\n (A) production of documents, or electronically stored information, or things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person; and\n\n(B) inspection of premises, at the premises to be inspected.\n\n#### **(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement.**\n\n*(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions.* A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney's fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.\n\n#### *(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.*\n\n *(A) Appearance Not Required.* A person commanded to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.\n\n *(B) Objections*. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:\n\n (i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an order compelling production or inspection.\n\n (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.\n\n#### *(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.*\n\n *(A) When Required.* On timely motion, the court for the district where compliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that:\n\n (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limits\n\nspecified in Rule 45(c);\n\n (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or\n\n(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.\n\n *(B) When Permitted.* To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:\n\n (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information; or\n\n (ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert's study that was not requested by a party.\n\n *(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative.* In the circumstances described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:\n\n (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and\n\n (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.\n\n#### **(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.**\n\n *(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information.* These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:\n\n *(A) Documents.* A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.\n\n *(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified.* If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.\n\n *(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form.* The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.\n\n *(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information.* The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.\n\n#### *(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.*\n\n *(A) Information Withheld.* A person withholding subpoenaed information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must:\n\n(i) expressly make the claim; and\n\n (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.\n\n *(B) Information Produced.* If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trialpreparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information under seal to the court for the district where compliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.\n\n… **(g) Contempt.** The court for the district where compliance is required – and also, after a motion is transferred, the issuing court – may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena or an order related to it.\n\nFor access to subpoena materials, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a) Committee Note (2013)\n\n| -------------------------------------------------------<br>x |                                   |  |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|--|\n| In re:                                                       | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11              |  |\n| HO WAN KWOK,                                                 | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |  |\n| Debtor.1                                                     | :<br>:<br>Re: ECF No. 839<br>:    |  |\n| --------------------------------------------------------x    |                                   |  |\n\n## **ORDER**\n\n## **GRANTING FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL OMNIBUS MOTION OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE FOR ENTRY OF ORDER UNDER BANKRUPTCY RULE 2004 AND LOCAL RULE 2004-1 AUTHORIZING DISCOVERY WITH RESPECT TO ADDITIONAL LEGAL AND FINANCIAL ADVISORS TO THE DEBTOR, ENTITIES AND INDIVIDUALS AFFILIATED WITH DEBTOR, AND RELEVANT BANKS**\n\nUpon consideration of the Application seeking an order authorizing a Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 examination of the Examinees listed on Exhibit B thereto (the \"Application\", ECF No. 637), filed by Luc Despins, as the appointed Chapter 11 Trustee to the Debtor's estate (the \"Applicant\"), after notice and a hearing, see 11 U.S.C. § 102(1), it appearing that cause exists to grant the requested relief as conditioned hereafter; it is hereby\n\n**ORDERED**: The Rule 2004 Motion is granted as set forth below.\n\n**ORDERED**: Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C., as counsel for the Trustee, is hereby authorized to sign Subpoenas in a form substantially similar to the Subpoenas attached to the Rule 2004 Motion as Exhibits C-1 to C-25 and to serve the Subpoenas, along with a copy of this Order, in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 2004 requiring examination and the production of documents by the Examinees listed on Exhibit B to the Application.\n\n**ORDERED**: Subject to any rights under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and applicable Local Rules, and unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the Examinees are hereby directed to produce all documents within 30 days of the service of the Subpoena, or such other time as agreed upon by the Trustee. To the extent an Examinee does not produce any documents requested in the Subpoena on the basis of some privilege, the Examinee is hereby directed to produce to the Trustee a privilege log that comports with Fed. R. Civ. P.\n\n<sup>1</sup> Although the Debtor's legal name is Ho Wan Kwok, he is also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases. The last four digits of the Debtor's taxpayer identification number are 9595.\n\n45(e)(2), made applicable by Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9016, and D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e), within 30 days of service of the Subpoena, or such other time as agreed upon by the Trustee.\n\n**ORDERED**: The Examinees are hereby directed to ensure that all documents and other information, including without limitation in any electronic format, requested in the Subpoenas or otherwise relevant to theDebtor, his business, assets, liabilities, financial condition, orthis Chapter 11 case, are properly maintained, are available for production, inspection and copying, and are not destroyed.\n\n**ORDERED**: Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C., as counsel for the Trustee, is hereby authorized, without further order of this Court, to take the testimony of one or more representatives of any Examinee listed on Exhibit B to the Application by examination under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 either at the offices of Neubert, Pepe & Montheith, 195 Church Street, 13th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510, at the offices of Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166, or at such other place that is mutually acceptable to the parties, on a date acceptable to the Trustee, which, at the election of the Trustee, shall be not less than 14 calendar days after the production of documents by the proposed examinee in compliance with the Subpoena and this Order pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 2004, and such examination shall continue from day to day until completed.\n\nDated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 21st day of September, 2022.\n\n| Case 22-50073<br>Doc 1303<br>Filed 01/06/23<br>Entered 01/06/23 16:10:41<br>Page 29 of 35 |  |  |  |  |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                           |  |  |  |  |\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>x |             |                         |  |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-------------------------|--|\n| In re:                                                           | :<br>:      | Chapter 11              |  |\n| 1<br>HO WAN KWOK,<br>et al.,                                     | :<br>:<br>: | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |  |\n| Debtors.                                                         | :<br>:      | (Jointly Administered)  |  |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------      | x           |                         |  |\n\n## **[PROPOSED] ORDER COMPELLING JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. TO COMPLY WITH RULE 2004 SUBPOENA AND AWARDING SANCTIONS**\n\nUpon consideration of the Motion seeking an order compelling JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (the \"Defaulting Respondent\") to comply with the Court's *Order Granting First Supplemental Omnibus Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee for Entry of Order Under Bankruptcy Rule 2004 and Local Rule 2004-1 Authorizing Discovery with Respect to Additional Legal and Financial Advisors to the Debtor, Entities and Individuals Affiliates with the Debtor, and Relevant Banks* dated September 21, 2022 (ECF No. 866, the \"Rule 2004 Order\") and with the subpoenas (the \"Chase Subpoena\") the Trustee issued to the Defaulting Respondent pursuant to the Rule 2004 Order, after notice and a hearing, *see* 11 U.S.C. § 102(1), it appearing that cause exists to grant the requested relief as conditioned hereafter; it is hereby\n\n**ORDERED**: The Motion is granted as set forth below.\n\n**ORDERED**: The Defaulting Respondent shall search for and produce all documents responsive to the Chase Subpoena within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order.\n\n**ORDERED**: Within fourteen (14) days of entry of this Order, in the event the Defaulting Respondent remains unresponsive to the Chase Subpoena, the Defaulting Respondent shall be in civil contempt of Court, shall be estopped from raising any objections to the Subpoenas, and shall be required to pay the Trustee's attorneys' fees related to this Motion.\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nx : : : : : :\n\nIn re:\n\nHO WAN KWOK, *et al*., 1\n\nDebtors.\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------\n\nCase No. 22-50073 (JAM) (Jointly Administered)\n\n----------------------------------------------------- x\n\n## **NOTICE OF CONTESTED MATTER RESPONSE DATE**\n\nChapter 11\n\nLuc A. Despins, as Chapter 11 Trustee (the \"Movant\") has filed a Motion for Entry of Order Compelling JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to Comply with Rule 2004 Subpoena (the \"Contested Matter\") with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut. Notice is hereby given that any response to the Contested Matter must be filed with the Court no later than January 20, 2023, in accordance with Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 2002(a) and 9014. 2 In the absence of a timely filed response, the proposed order in the Contested Matter *may* enter without further notice and hearing, *see*, 11 U.S.C. section 102(1).\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut\n\nDated: January 6, 2023 LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: /s/Douglas S. Skalka\n\nDouglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 821-2000 dskalka@npmlaw.com\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<sup>2</sup> Pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9006(f), if service is made by mail, three days are added after the response date set in this notice.\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>x |    |                         |  |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-------------------------|--|\n|                                                                  | :  |                         |  |\n| In re:                                                           | :  | Chapter 11              |  |\n|                                                                  | :  |                         |  |\n| 1<br>HO WAN KWOK,<br>et al.,                                     | :  | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |  |\n|                                                                  | :  |                         |  |\n| Debtors.                                                         | :  | (Jointly Administered)  |  |\n| -----------------------------------------------------            | x: |                         |  |\n\n## **CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**\n\nIn accordance with applicable provisions of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure\n\n2002 and 7004, the undersigned certifies that on January 6, 2023, the following documents were\n\nserved on the United States Trustee and all appearing parties via the Court's electronic filing\n\nsystem or by first class mail on each party listed on the Service List.\n\n## **I. Documents Served**\n\n- Motion for Entry of Order Compelling JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. to Comply with Rule 2004 Subpoena\n- Declaration of Patrick R. Linsey in Support of Motion\n- Exhibit A\n- Proposed Order\n- Notice of Contested Matter Response Date\n\n## **II. Service List**\n\n## **a. Electronic Mail Service List**\n\n- Laura Aronsson laronsson@omm.com\n- Tristan G. Axelrod taxelrod@brownrudnick.com\n- William R. Baldiga wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com\n- Kellianne Baranowsky kbaranowsky@gs-lawfirm.com, aevans@gslawfirm.com;kbaranowsky@ecf.courtdrive.com\n- Douglass E. Barron douglassbarron@paulhastings.com\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n- Nicholas A. Bassett nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com, jonathonkosciewicz@paulhastings.com;lucdespins@paulhastings.com;alexbongartz@pa ulhastings.com;ezrasutton@paulhastings.com;douglassbarron@paulhastings.com;ecf.frg @paulhastings.com;aviluft@paulhastings.com\n- Patrick M. Birney pbirney@rc.com, ctrivigno@rc.com\n- Christopher H. Blau cblau@zeislaw.com\n- G. Alexander Bongartz alexbongartz@paulhastings.com\n- Carollynn H.G. Callari ccallari@callaripartners.com\n- Daniel Cantor dcantor@omm.com\n- John L. Cesaroni jcesaroni@zeislaw.com\n- Scott M. Charmoy scottcharmoy@charmoy.com, ecf-3ae5beb98d9b@ecf.pacerpro.com;charmoysr97992@notify.bestcase.com\n- Holley L. Claiborn holley.l.claiborn@usdoj.gov\n- Samuel Bryant Davidoff sdavidoff@wc.com\n- Luc A. Despins lucdespins@paulhastings.com, matlaskowski@paulhastings.com;davidmohamed@paulhastings.com\n- David S. Forsh dforsh@callaripartners.com\n- Peter Friedman pfriedman@omm.com\n- Taruna Garg tgarg@murthalaw.com, mgarcia@murthalaw.com\n- Irve J. Goldman igoldman@pullcom.com, rmccoy@pullcom.com\n- Evan S. Goldstein egoldstein@uks.com\n- Mia N. Gonzalez mgonzalez@omm.com\n- James C. Graham jgraham@npmlaw.com, sgibbons@npmlaw.com;NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n- Lawrence S. Grossman LGrossman@gs-lawfirm.com, aevans@gslawfirm.com;ngolino@gslawfirm.com;lawrencegrossman@ecf.courtdrive.com;mbuckanavage@gslawfirm.com;eross@gs-lawfirm.com\n- David V. Harbach dharbach@omm.com\n- James J. Healy jhealy@cowderymurphy.com\n- Jeffrey Hellman jeff@jeffhellmanlaw.com, christen@jeffhellmanlaw.com\n- Eric A. Henzy ehenzy@zeislaw.com, cjervey@zeislaw.com\n- Jonathan Kaplan jkaplan@pullcom.com, prulewicz@pullcom.com;rmccoy@pullcom.com\n- Stephen M. Kindseth skindseth@zeislaw.com, cjervey@zeislaw.com\n- Andrew V. Layden alayden@bakerlaw.com\n- Patrick R. Linsey plinsey@npmlaw.com, karguello@npmlaw.com;NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n- Avram Emmanuel Luft aviluft@paulhastings.com\n- Kristin B. Mayhew kmayhew@pullcom.com, kwarshauer@mdmclaw.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com\n- Danielle L. Merola dmerola@bakerlaw.com\n- Sherry J. Millman smillman@stroock.com\n- Aaron A Mitchell aaron@lmesq.com\n- James M. Moriarty jmoriarty@zeislaw.com, cgregory@zeislaw.com\n- Sara Pahlavan spahlavan@omm.com\n- Patrick N. Petrocelli ppetrocelli@stroock.com\n- Lucas Bennett Rocklin lrocklin@npmlaw.com, NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n- Aaron Romney aromney@zeislaw.com, swenthen@zeislaw.com\n- Scott D. Rosen srosen@cb-shea.com, msullivan@cbshealaw.com;dtempera@cbshealaw.com\n- Thomas J. Sansone tsansone@carmodylaw.com\n- Stuart M. Sarnoff ssarnoff@omm.com, stuart-sarnoff-1059@ecf.pacerpro.com\n- David M.S. Shaiken david@shipmanlawct.com\n- Douglas S. Skalka dskalka@npmlaw.com, smowery@npmlaw.com;NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n- Jeffrey M. Sklarz jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com, aevans@gslawfirm.com;mbuckanavage@gs-lawfirm.com;eross@gslawfirm.com;jsklarz@ecf.courtdrive.com\n- Annecca H. Smith asmith@rc.com\n- John Troy johntroy@troypllc.com\n- Tiffany Troy troylegalpllc@gmail.com, troylaw@troypllc.com\n- U. S. Trustee USTPRegion02.NH.ECF@USDOJ.GOV\n- Stephen G. Walko swalko@ibolaw.com\n- Michael S. Weinstein mweinstein@golenbock.com\n- Jay Marshall Wolman jmw@randazza.com, ecf-6898@ecf.pacerpro.com\n- Peter J. Zarella pzarella@mdmc-law.com\n\n## **b. Manual Service by USPS, first class, postage prepaid**:\n\nBrown Rudnick LLP Attn: President or General Mgr One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111\n\nChao-Chih Chiu, Huizhen Wang Yunxia Wu, Keyi Zilkie c/o TroyGould PC 1801 Century Park East, 16th Floor Attn: Christopher A. Lilly Los Angeles, CA 90067-2367\n\nGregory A. Coleman Coleman Worldwide Advisors, LLC P O Box 2839 New York, NY 10008-2839\n\nJ. Ted Donovan, Kevin J. Nash Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP 1501 Broadway 22nd Floor New York, NY 10036\n\nDundon Advisers LLC Attn: President or General Mgr 10 Bank Street, Suite 1100 White Plains, NY 10606\n\nPeter M. Friedman O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 1625 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006\n\nFrancis J. Lawall Pepper Hamilton LLP 3000 Two Logan Square 18th & Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799\n\nSteven E. Mackey Office of the U.S. Trustee The Giaimo Federal Building 150 Court Street, Room 302 New Haven, CT 06510\n\nSherry Millman Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP 180 Maiden Lane New York, NY 10038\n\nRichard C. Morrissey Office of the U.S. Trustee 201 Varick Street, Room 1006 New York, NY 10014\n\nEdward Moss, Diana Perez Stuart Sarnoff, and Daniel Shamah O'Melveny & Myers LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036\n\nAlissa M. Nann Foley & Lardner LLP 90 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016\n\nIrve Goldman, Esq. Pullman & Comley, LLC 850 Main Street Bridgeport, CT 06601\n\nGabriel Sasson Paul Hastings LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut\n\nDouglas E. Spelfogel Derek L. Wright Mayer Brown LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020-1001\n\nStretto Attn: President or General Mgr 410 Exchange, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92602\n\nYongbing Zhang 223 West Jackson Blvd. #1012 Chicago, IL 60606\n\nGenever Holdings Corporation P.O. Box 3170 Road Town Tortola, BVI\n\nGenever Holdings LLC 781 Fifth Avenue Apt. 1801 New York, NY 10022-5520\n\nJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Attn: President or General Mgr 2125 Main Street Bridgeport, CT 06606\n\n## Dated: January 6, 2023 LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: /s/Douglas S. Skalka Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 821-2000 dskalka@npmlaw.com","body_zh":"-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　：\n：　第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等　：\n：　案号 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。　：　（联合管理）\n\nx\n\n第11章受托人请求作出命令，强制 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.（摩根大通银行，N.A.）遵守规则2004传票的动议\n\nLuc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯平斯）以获任命管理 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（“个人债务人”）第11章案件（“第11章案件”）的第11章受托人（“受托人”）身份，特此根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》（“联邦规则”）第26条和第37条，以及《联邦破产程序规则》（“破产规则”）第2004条和第9016条，提交本动议（“强制动议”），请求作出一项实质上采用随附命令草案（“拟议命令”）形式的命令，强制 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.（“违约被申请人”）遵守本院于 September 21, 2022 作出的《批准第11章受托人根据破产规则2004和地方法则2004-1请求作出命令的第一份补充综合动议，以授权就债务人的其他法律及财务顾问、与债务人关联的实体和个人及相关银行进行证据开示》的命令（ECF No. 866，即“规则2004命令”），并遵守受托人向违约被申请人发出的传票。\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 和 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，收件人为 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 遗产的受托人（仅供通知和通信之用）。\n\n该传票系依该命令发出。为支持强制动议，受托人谨陈述如下：\n\n事实背景\n\nI. 受托人的规则2004动议、命令及传票\n\n1. 于 September 7, 2021，受托人提交了《第11章受托人根据破产规则2004和地方法则2004-1请求作出命令的第一份补充综合动议，以授权就债务人的其他法律及财务顾问、与债务人关联的实体和个人及相关银行进行证据开示》（“第一份综合2004动议”），请求就个人债务人的各类法律及财务顾问、与个人债务人关联的人员，以及与本案有关的、据信个人债务人及与其相关的人员和实体在其中存放资金或进行金融交易的银行进行证据开示。\n\n2. 这些银行包括违约被申请人。具体而言，受托人有理由相信，个人债务人及债务人 Genever Holdings LLC（“Genever (U.S.)”）在违约被申请人处持有账户。基于此及其他原因，违约被申请人极有可能持有与个人债务人的资产及财务事务相关的文件。\n\n3. 违约被申请人未对第一份综合2004动议提出异议。第一份综合2004动议于 September 21, 2022 经作出规则2004命令而获批准。\n\n4. 于 September 26, 2022，根据规则2004命令，受托人向违约被申请人送达了附有文件提交请求的规则2004审查传票（合称“Chase 传票”）。Chase 传票的真实、准确副本作为附件A随附于此。Chase 传票要求在 October 24, 2022 或之前予以遵守。\n\n5. 违约被申请人未对遵守 Chase 传票提出异议。相反，违约被申请人于 October 12 和 19, 2022 通过向其律师留电话留言的方式联系受托人，请求提供有关 Chase 传票中与证据开示相关的人员和实体的信息。\n\n6. 为协助违约被申请人遵守规则2004命令，受托人汇编了信息，以协助违约被申请人就 Chase 传票进行检索。受托人的律师通过电话和电子邮件联系违约被申请人，包括于 October 19, 2022、November 15, 2022 及 November 16, 2022，请求举行电话会议以提供该等信息，并以其他方式讨论违约被申请人对 Chase 传票的遵守情况。\n\n7. 于 November 18, 2022，受托人的律师再次通过电子邮件请求与违约被申请人进行协商，并警告违约被申请人，持续未作回应将迫使受托人提交动议以强制遵守 Chase 传票，并保留在该等情况下寻求适当制裁的权利。\n\n8. 违约被申请人未能且拒绝对前述通信作出回应。因此提出本强制动议。\n\n管辖权及审判地\n\n9. 本院根据 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 对审理本事项具有管辖权。根据 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409，审判地适当。根据包括 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2) (A), (E), and (O) 在内的规定，本事项属于核心程序。\n\n请求的救济\n\n10. 受托人请求作出拟议命令，强制违约被申请人遵守 Chase 传票，并认定违约被申请人因迄今未予遵守而构成民事藐视法庭。\n\n救济依据\n\nI. 违约被申请人必须遵守 Chase 传票\n\n11. 受托人的职责是为个人债务人债权人的利益调查个人债务人的资产及事务。“规则2004审查的目的在于协助利害关系方确定破产财团的性质和范围，揭示资产，审查交易，并评估是否发生不当行为。”In re Transmar Commodity Grp. Ltd., Case No. 16-13625-JLG, 2018 WL 4006324, at *4 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018)（省略内部引文及引证）。这包括揭示财团的性质和范围，并发现债务人可能故意或无意隐匿的资产。In re Bennett Funding Grp., Inc., 203 B.R. 24, 27-28 (Bankr. N.D.N.Y. 1996); 另见 In re Millennium Lab Holdings II, LLC, 562 B.R. 614, 626 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016)（“规则2004审查的正当目标包括发现资产、审查交易，以及确定是否发生不当行为。”）（省略内部引文及引证）；同上（指出，“与狭义聚焦于争议相关问题的传统证据开示不同，规则2004的范围广泛且不受限制，常被比作钓鱼式调查和审讯”）（省略内部引证及标点）；Fed. R. Bankr. P. 2004(b)（授权规则2004审查的范围“涉及……债务人的……财产……及财务状况，或任何可能影响债务人财团管理的事项”）（着重号为后加）。\n\n12. 受托人有合理理由相信，违约被申请人持有与受托人调查相关的记录，其中包括关于个人债务人及 Genever U.S. 所持账户的记录。因此，受托人取得了规则2004命令，并向违约被申请人送达了规则2004命令。违约被申请人没有理由无视或拒绝遵守 Chase 传票。因此，本院应强制违约被申请人遵守 Chase 传票。\n\nII. 应认定违约被申请人构成民事藐视法庭\n\n13. 《联邦民事诉讼规则》第45(e)条规定：“任何人无正当理由不遵守向其送达的传票，可被视为藐视发出该传票的法院。”In re Corso, 328 B.R. 375, 385 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)（引述 FRCP 45(e)）（省略引文）；PaineWebber Inc. v. Acstar Ins. Co., 211 F.R.D. 247, 249 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)（“一方当事人未对传票提出异议且亦未予遵守的，可根据第45[(e)]条被认定为藐视法庭。”）（省略内部引文）。\n\n14. 为认定一方当事人构成民事藐视法庭，“法院仅需：(1) 已作出明确且无歧义的命令；(2) 根据明确且令人信服的证据认定该命令未获遵守；以及 (3) 认定被指称的藐视者未能明确证明其无法遵守该命令的条款。”Huber v. Marine Midland Bank, 51 F.3d 5, 10 (2d Cir. 1995)（引述 N.A. Sales Co. v. Chapman Indus. Corp., 736 F.2d 854, 857 (2d Cir. 1984)）。\n\n15. 在民事藐视法庭程序中，只要被违反的命令“明确且无歧义，不遵守［该命令］的证据明确且令人信服，且藐视者未作出合理勤勉的遵守努力”，藐视法庭的认定即应获维持。Corso, 328 B.R. at 385（引述 United States v. Local 1804–1, Int'l Longshoremen's Assn., 44 F.3d 1091, 1096 (2d Cir.1995)（省略引文）（原文改动））。\n\n16. 此外，未在规定期限内及时回应传票或对传票提出异议的一方当事人，不得在之后提出异议。见 Corso, 328 B.R. at 384-85（“由于［被传唤方］未对受托人的传票及时提出任何异议，亦未及时申请撤销传票，故其放弃了对该传票提出异议的权利。”）。\n\n17. 最后，法院已认定，未回应传票或未对传票提出异议的一方当事人，可因该等不作为而受到制裁。见 PaineWebber Inc., 211 F.R.D. at 249（“一方当事人未对传票提出异议且亦未予遵守的，可根据第45[(e)]条被认定为藐视法庭，因此可施加制裁。”）（省略内部引文，着重号为后加）；Corso, 328 B.R. at 385-86（维持破产法院对未作出“任何努力”遵守规则2004传票的一方当事人施加的制裁）。具体而言，第二巡回区法院在一方当事人未遵守传票时，曾裁定律师费。见 Gucci Am., Inc. v. Li, No. 10-CV-4974 (RJS), 2015 WL 7758872, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2015)（“本巡回区法院在一方当事人或非当事人故意未遵守传票时，曾裁定律师费。”）。\n\n18. 本案中，已送达附于 Chase 传票的文件请求，并且，尽管知悉 Chase 传票，违约被申请人未作出任何努力遵守 Chase 传票。见同上（在传票送达明确且无歧义、且未作出任何遵守努力的情况下，维持破产法院的藐视法庭命令）。\n\n19. 实际上，在违约被申请人请求受托人提供有关 Chase 传票所要求检索的补充信息，且受托人配合汇编该等信息后，违约被申请人完全停止回应受托人的通信。\n\n20. 因此，本院应作出命令，(i) 认定违约被申请人民事藐视本院，(ii) 禁止违约被申请人就 Chase 传票提出任何异议，以及 (iii) 命令违约被申请人支付受托人与本动议相关的律师费。\n\n此前未提出请求\n\n21. 受托人此前未向本院或任何其他法院请求本文件所请求的救济。\n\n律师证明\n\n22. 如上所述，并如随附提交的 Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛）声明所述，受托人的律师已多次善意寻求与不遵守规定的被申请人协商，以努力解决本争议，而不遵守规定的被申请人的律师未能或拒绝作出回应。\n\n因此，基于上述理由，受托人谨请求签发所附拟议命令，准予本强制动议所请求的救济以及其他公正且适当的救济。\n\n日期：January 6, 2022　LUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut（康涅狄格州纽黑文）　CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE（第11章受托人）\n\n代理人：/s/Douglas S. Skalka　Douglas S. Skalka（道格拉斯·S·斯卡尔卡）（ct00616）　Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛）（ct29437）　NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩及蒙蒂思律师事务所）　195 Church Street, 13th Floor　New Haven, Connecticut 06510　(203) 821-2000　dskalka@npmlaw.com　plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　：\n：　第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等，　：\n：　Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。　：\n：\n：　（联合管理）\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n帕特里克·R·林赛为支持第11章受托人申请签发命令强制JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.（摩根大通银行，全国协会）遵守规则2004传票之动议而作的声明\n\n本人，帕特里克·R·林赛，声明如下：\n\n1. 本人是一名获准在康涅狄格州执业的律师，系Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.律师事务所的助理律师，并担任Luc A. Despins作为第11章受托人（下称“受托人”）的律师。本人谨提交本声明，以支持第11章受托人申请签发命令强制JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.遵守规则2004传票之动议（下称“本动议”）。\n\n2. 本人曾多次要求与JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.（下称“违约答复人”）就本动议所涉问题进行协商，包括但不限于November 16, 2022。违约答复人未能或拒绝对这些协商请求作出回应。\n\n2　本第11章案件中的债务人为Ho Wan Kwok（亦称Guo Wengui、Miles Guo及Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC及Genever Holdings Corporation的邮寄地址为Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，收件人为Luc A. Despins，作为Ho Wan Kwok遗产的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\n依据28 U.S.C. § 1746，据本人所知、所获信息及相信，并经合理调查后，本人特在伪证罪处罚下声明，上述内容真实且正确。\n\n日期：January 6, 2023\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut　谨此提交，\n\n代理人：/s/ Patrick R. Linsey　Patrick R. Linsey（ct29437）　NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.　195 Church Street, 13th Floor　New Haven, Connecticut 06510　(203) 781-2847　plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n附件A\n\nB2540（表格2540——规则2004审查传票）（12/15）Case 22-50073 Doc 1303 Filed 01/06/23 Entered 01/06/23 16:10:41 Page 11 of 35\n\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT（美国破产法院）\n\n________________________________________________________________________　District of ________________________________________________________________________ Connecticut\n\n关于________________________________________________________________________\n\nCase No. ________________________________ Ho Wan Kwok 22-50073\n\n债务人\n\nChapter __________________ 11\n规则2004审查传票\n\n致：________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.\n\n（传票所指向之人的姓名）\n\n证言：兹命令您于下列载明的时间、日期和地点出席，并依《联邦破产程序规则》规则2004接受审查并作证。随附准许该审查的法院命令副本。X\n\n地点　日期和时间\n\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.　October 24, 2022, 10 A.M.\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510　（见所附破产法院命令）\n\n审查将采用以下方式记录：________________________________________________________________________　法庭记录员/速记员\n\n提交：您或您的代表还必须携带下列文件、以电子方式存储的信息或物品参加审查，并必须允许对该等材料进行查验、复制、测试或抽样：X\n见随附的文件提交请求。\n\n《联邦民事诉讼规则》规则45的下列规定，依《联邦破产程序规则》规则9016适用于破产案件，现随附于后——关于履行地点的规则45(c)；关于作为受传票约束之人的保护的规则45(d)；以及关于您对本传票作出回应的义务及未如此做的潜在后果的规则45(e)和45(g)。\n\n日期：__________________ September 22, 2022\n\n法院书记员\n\n或\n\n____________________________　书记员或副书记员签名　____________________________　律师签名　Patrick R. Linsey（ct29437）\n\n签发或请求本传票的、代表（当事人名称）________________________________________的律师姓名、地址、电子邮件地址和电话号码如下：Luc Despins，第11章受托人\n\nPatrick R. Linsey, Esq.; Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.; 195 Church Street, 13th Floor, New Haven, Connecticut 06510　plinsey@npmlaw.com; (203) 821-2000\n\n致签发或请求本传票之人的通知\n\n如本传票命令在审判前提交文件、以电子方式存储的信息或有形物品，或查验场所，则必须在向被指向之人送达前，向各方当事人送达通知及本传票副本。Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4)。\n\n文件提交请求\nI. 指示\n\n1. 除非另有说明，下列文件请求（下称“请求”，每一项单称“一项请求”）必须分别且具体地作出答复。除非善意提出异议，否则每项请求均应得到完整答复；如提出异议，应按如下规定详细说明您提出异议的理由。如异议仅涉及一项请求的一部分，或其中所含的一个词、短语或条款，您仅须说明对该部分的异议，并对其余请求作出答复。\n\n2. 以电子方式存储的信息必须依照以下指示提交：\n\na. 图像。黑白图像必须为300 DPI Group IV单页TIFF文件。彩色图像必须以JPEG格式提交。文件名不得包含嵌入空格或特殊字符（包括逗号）。文件夹名称不得包含嵌入空格或特殊字符（包括逗号）。所有TIFF图像文件必须具有唯一文件名，即Bates编号。每幅图像右下角必须标注连续的Bates编号。每个文件夹中的TIFF文件不得超过1000个。Excel电子表格应具有以该文件Bates编号命名的占位图像。\n\nb. 图像加载文件\n\na. Concordance®数据文件。数据文件（.DAT）包含将加载至Concordance®数据库的所有字段化信息。.DAT文件的第一行必须为标识字段名称的标题行。.DAT文件必须使用以下Concordance®默认分隔符：逗号ASCII字符（020）引号þ ASCII字符（254）。日期字段应采用以下格式提供：mm/dd/yyyy。日期和时间字段必须为两个独立字段。如文件包括图像化的电子邮件及附件，必须包含附件字段，以保留电子邮件与其附件之间的父/子关系。必须包含OCRPATH字段，以提供所提交存储介质上提取文本文件的文件路径和名称。文本文件必须以FIRSTBATES命名。不得将文本包含在.DAT文件中。对于具有原生文件的文件，必须包含LINK字段，以提供原生文件的文件路径和名称。原生文件必须以FIRSTBATES命名。\n\nb. Concordance Image®或Opticon交叉引用文件。图像交叉引用文件（.LOG或.OPT）将图像链接至数据库记录。其应为以逗号分隔的文件，每行由七个字段构成，并且数据库中的每幅图像在交叉引用文件中均应有一行，格式如下：ImageID,VolumeLabel,ImageFilePath,DocumentBreak,FolderBreak,Box Break,PageCoun。\n\nc. 文件文本。文本必须作为独立文本文件提交，而非作为.DAT文件内的字段。文本文件的完整路径（OCRPATH）应包含在.DAT文件中。建议使用以FIRSTBATES/Image Key命名的文件级ANSI文本文件。提取的文本文件必须存放于单独文件夹中，每个文件夹中的文本文件不得超过1,000个。文件夹名称中不得有特殊字符（包括逗号）。文本文件必须按文件级别提供。\n\nd. 特定文件类型的原生提交。为完整理解其内容和含义而合理需要以原生格式查看的文件类型，必须以原生格式提交。此类文件包括但不限于电子表格、类电子表格文件（Microsoft Excel、逗号分隔值、制表符分隔值等）、Microsoft PowerPoint或其他特殊演示文件、数据库文件以及音频/视频文件。提供一份标有Bates编号的分隔页图像，以表明存在原生文件，并将原生文件路径作为字段包含在.dat文件中。提交的原生文件应以与该文件分隔页相对应的Bates编号命名。将原生文件归入名称递增的“NATIVE”目录中，与图像目录分开。\n\ne. 去重。对于存在完全重复副本的每份电子文件，仅提交一份副本。对于电子邮件，基于由BCC、Body、CC、From、IntMsgID、To及Attach属性生成的MD5哈希值合并重复文件。对于电子邮件附件及独立电子文件，基于整个文件的MD5哈希值合并重复文件。\n\nf. 元数据。以符合Concordance要求的加载文件（.dat）形式提交每份文件的提取元数据。.DAT文件的第一行必须为标识字段名称的标题行。.DAT文件必须使用以下Concordance默认分隔符：逗号，ASCII字符（020）引号þ ASCII字符（254）\n\n日期字段应采用以下格式提供：mm/dd/yyyy。日期和时间字段必须为两个独立字段。下列为必需的元数据：\n\n字段名称　示例数据　说明\n\nFIRSTBATES　EDC0000001　原生文件文档/电子邮件的首个 Bates 编号\nLASTBATES　EDC0000001　原生文件文档/电子邮件的最后一个 Bates 编号\nLASTBATES 字段应针对单页文件填写\nATTACHRANGE　EDC0000001\n-　母文档第一页的 Bates 编号\nEDC0000015　至最后一个附件“子”文档最后一页的 Bates 编号\nBEGATTACH　EDC0000001　附件范围的首个 Bates 编号\nENDATTACH　EDC0000015　附件范围的最后一个 Bates 编号\nCUSTODIAN　Smith, John（约翰·史密斯）　电子邮件：电子邮件所在的邮箱\n原生文件：文档源自其文件的个人或部门名称\nFROM　John Smith（约翰·史密斯）　电子邮件：发件人\n原生文件：文档作者\n多个条目应使用分号分隔\nTO　Coffman, Janice（珍妮丝·科夫曼）; LeeW　收件人\n[mailto:LeeW@MSN.com]　多个条目应使用分号分隔\nCC　Frank Thompson（弗兰克·汤普森） [mailto:　抄送收件人\nfrank_Thompson@cdt.com]　多个条目应使用分号分隔\nBCC　John Cain（约翰·凯恩）　密送收件人\n多个条目应使用分号分隔\nSUBJECT　Board Meeting Minutes（董事会会议纪要）　电子邮件：电子邮件主题行 原生文件：文档标题（如有）\nFILE_NAME　BoardMeetingMinutes.docx　原生文件：原始原生文件名称，包括扩展名\nDATE_SENT　10/12/2010　电子邮件：电子邮件发送日期\n原生文件：（空）\nTIME_SENT/　07:05 PM GMT　电子邮件：电子邮件发送时间/电子邮件标准化所采用时区内的时间\nTIME_ZONE　电子邮件标准化所采用的时区\nTIME_ZONE　GMT　电子邮件在转换期间标准化所采用的时区。\nLINK　EDC0000001.msg　电子邮件或原生文件文档的超链接\n链接文件必须按照 FIRSTBATES 编号命名\nFILE_EXTEN　MSG　表示电子邮件或原生文件的文件类型扩展名\nAUTHOR　John Smith（约翰·史密斯）　电子邮件：（空）\n原生文件：文档作者\nDATE_CREATED　10/10/2010　电子邮件：（空）\n原生文件：文档创建日期\n\nTIME_CREATED　10:25 AM　电子邮件：（空）\n\n原生文件：文档创建时间\n该数据必须为单独字段，不得与 DATE_CREATED 字段合并\nDATE_MOD　10/12/2010　电子邮件：（空）\n原生文件：文档最后修改日期\nTIME_MOD　07:00 PM　电子邮件：（空）\n原生文件：文档最后修改时间\n该数据必须为单独字段，不得与 DATE_MOD 字段合并\nDATE_ACCESSD　10/12/2010　电子邮件：（空）\n原生文件：文档最后访问日期\nTIME_ACCESSD　07:00 PM　电子邮件：（空）\n原生文件：文档最后访问时间\n该数据必须为单独字段，不得与 DATE_ACCESSD 字段合并\nFILE_SIZE　5,952　原生文件文档/电子邮件的大小，以 KB 为单位\nPGCOUNT　1　原生文件文档/电子邮件的页数\nPATH　电子邮件：（空）\nAgenda.doc　原生文件：存储原生文件文档的路径，包括原始文件名称。\nINTFILEPATH　Personal Folders\\Deleted　电子邮件：电子邮件的原始位置，包括\nItems\\Board Meeting　原始文件名称。\nMinutes.msg　原生文件：（空）\nINTMSGID　<000805c2c71b\\$75977050\\$　电子邮件：唯一消息 ID 原生文件：（空）\ncb8306d1@MSN>\nMD5HASH　d131dd02c5e6eec4693d9a0　文档的 MD5 哈希值。\n698aff95c\n2fcab58712467eab4004583e\nb8fb7f89\nOCRPATH　TEXT/001/EDC0000001.txt　提取的原生文件文本的路径\n\n3. 各项请求独立适用并应独立解释；除非另有说明，任何一项请求均不限制任何其他请求的范围。\n\n4. 所有文件均应按照正常业务过程中保存的方式提供，或者应进行组织和标注，以对应本请求中的类别。\n\n5. 本文件所载的每项请求均适用于以下所有文件：(a) 由您占有、保管或控制的文件；或 (b) 由代表您行事的任何人占有、保管或控制的文件，包括您的律师或其他代表及顾问。各文件均应完整提供。\n\n6. 如要求您提供已不再由您占有、保管或控制的文件，则您的答复必须：(a) 详细说明该文件的性质及其内容；(b) 确定编制或撰写该文件的人员（以及，如适用，向其发送该文件的人员）；(c) 确定该文件编制或创建的日期；(d) 说明该文件是否 (i) 遗失或丢失，(ii) 已被销毁，(iii) 已自愿或非自愿地转移给他人，或 (iv) 已以其他方式处置；(e) 说明该等处置的原因以及相关事实和情况；(f) 确定授权该等处置的人员；(g) 确定该等处置的日期或大致日期；(h) 说明该文件最后一次由您占有、保管或控制的时间；以及 (i) 确定目前占有、保管或控制该文件的人员（如有）。\n\n7. 如要求您提供已被销毁的文件，则除前述指示所要求的信息外，您的答复还必须说明：(a) 销毁该文件的原因；(b) 销毁该文件的人员身份；以及 (c) 指示销毁该文件的人员身份。\n\n8. 如您主张所请求的文件享有特权或属于律师工作成果，则您的答复必须：(a) 说明 (i) 足以支持您关于该文件享有特权之主张的文件描述，(ii) 文件标题，(iii) 文件日期，(iv) 文件作者，(v) 文件收件人，(vi) 收到或阅览过文件原件或任何草稿、副本或复制件的每一人员身份，(vii) 该文件本身或文件所载或所提及的任何信息是否由任何其他人员占有、保管或控制，如是，则该等人员的身份，以及说明该等信息如何进入其占有范围的陈述，(viii) 据以不提供该文件的特权主张，以及 (ix) 您将据以支持该等特权主张的所有情形；以及 (b) 根据 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e)，就每份基于特权主张而扣留的文件，提供一份特权日志，其中载明本指示第 (a) 部分所要求的全部信息。对于文件请求中未主张特权或工作成果的任何部分，应完整提供相应文件。\n\n9. 如原本应予提供的文件的一部分含有受特权主张约束的信息，则仅应依照上述指示从该文件中删除或遮蔽受特权主张约束的部分，其余部分应予提供。\n\n10. 本请求具有持续性。特此指示您：(a) 一旦得知先前答复不完整或不正确，应立即补充或更正任何其后得知不完整或不正确的答复；以及 (b) 提供根据以下规定所要求的任何补充文件。\n\n11. 如文件使用英语以外的语言，您应提供该文件。如文件使用英语以外的语言，且存在英文译本，您应同时提供两份文件。\n\n12. 对实体的所有提及均包括其所有关联方。\n\n13. 对个人姓名的所有提及均包括所有替代姓名、别名或昵称。\n\n14. 除非另有明确说明，文件请求涵盖的期间为自 February 5, 2012 起至文件请求答复到期之日止。\n\nII. 解释规则\n\n15. (a) 任何单数名词的使用应解释为包括复数，反之亦然；以及 (b) 任何时态动词的使用应解释为包括该动词所有其他时态的使用。\n\n16. (a) “和”及“或”应视必要情形按连接或选择关系解释，以将否则可能被解释为超出任何请求范围的所有答复纳入该请求范围；以及 (b) “每一”及“任何”应视为包括并涵盖“每个”及“所有”二词。\n\nIII. 定义\n\n经 D. Conn. Bankr. L.R. 2004-1(a) 纳入的 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(c) 所载定义及 D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(d) 所载解释规则，适用于文件请求。此外，本文件请求中使用的下列术语具有下列含义：\n\n1. “您”或“您的”或“您本人”系指 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.（摩根大通银行，N.A.），连同其任何关联方、母公司及子公司，以及其任何雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。\n\n2. “债务人”系指 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（又名 Miles Kwok、Miles Guo、Guo Wengui、Guo Haoyun、郭文贵或任何其他别名），连同其雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。\n\n3. “债务人之子”系指 Qiang Guo（郭强）（又名 Mileson Kwok、郭强或任何其他别名），连同其雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。\n\n4. “债务人之女”系指 Mei Guo（郭美）（又名 Mei Gui、郭美或任何其他别名），连同其雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。\n\n5. “债务人自称的妻子”系指 Hing Chi Ngok（岳庆芝）（又名 Hing Chi Ng、Yue Qingzhi、岳庆芝或任何其他别名），连同其雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。\n\n6. “债务人家属”系指单独及共同的债务人、债务人之子、债务人之女及债务人自称的妻子，以及与债务人有任何其他亲属关系的人员。\n\n7. “2004 年证据开示对象”系指单独及共同的债务人、债务人家属、ACA Capital Group Limited（ACA资本集团有限公司）、Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际金融集团有限公司）、Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）、Himalaya International Payments Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际支付有限公司）、Himalaya International Reserves Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际储备有限公司）、Jesse Brown（杰西·布朗）、William Je（威廉·杰）、William Je、Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方利润有限公司）、HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited LLC（香港国际基金投资〈美国〉有限责任公司）、Bravo Luck Limited（好运有限公司）、Golden Spring (New York) Ltd.（金泉〈纽约〉有限公司）、Lamp Capital LLC（兰普资本有限责任公司）、Greenwich Land LLC（格林威治土地有限责任公司）、Qu Guo Jiao（屈国姣）、Daniel Thomas Podhaskie（丹尼尔·托马斯·波德哈斯基）、Yvette Wang（王雁平）、Ace Decade Holdings Limited（艾斯十年控股有限公司）、Dawn State Limited（曙光州有限公司）、Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会 IV 公司）、Rule of Law Foundation III（法治基金会 III）、GTV Media Group, Inc.（GTV媒体集团公司）、Voice of Guo Media, Inc.（郭媒体之声公司）及 Saraca Media Group Inc.（萨拉卡媒体集团公司）。\n\n8. “关联个人”系指单独及共同的所有下列个人：(1) 持有、控制、保管或对债务人或债务人家属拥有、控制或享有的资产具有酌处权；或 (2) 曾为一个或多个关联实体的雇员、董事，或以其他方式与其有关联，连同前述任何人员各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表其行事的任何人。该等关联个人包括但不限于：Daniel Podhaskie（丹尼尔·波德哈斯基）、Jason Miller（杰森·米勒）、Jesse Brown（杰西·布朗）、William Je（威廉·杰）、Steve Bannon（史蒂夫·班农）、Karin Maistrello（卡琳·迈斯特雷洛）、Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）、William Gertz（威廉·格茨）、Arethusa Forsyth（阿瑞图莎·福赛思）、Glenn Mellor（格伦·梅勒）、Jennifer Mercurio（詹妮弗·默丘里奥）、Eduardo Eurnekian（爱德华多·厄尔内基安）、Han Chunguang（韩春光）（又名 韩春光）、Qu Guojiao（屈国姣）（又名 Qu Guo Jiao、屈国姣）、Guo Lijie（郭丽杰）（又名 郭丽杰）、Zhang Wei（张伟）（又名 张伟\\*）、Lihong Wei Lafrenz（魏丽红）（又名 Sara Wei、魏丽红）、Hao Haidong（郝海东）（又名 郝海东）、Ross Heinemeyer（罗斯·海内迈耶）、Max Krasner（马克斯·克拉斯纳）、Kyle Bass（凯尔·巴斯）、Melissa Mendez（梅丽莎·门德斯）、Ya Li（李娅）（又名 李娅）、Dinggang Wang（王定刚）（又名 王定刚）、An Hong（安红）（又名 安红）、Yvette Wang（王雁平）（又名 Yanping Wang、Yan Ping Wang、王雁平）、Fiona Yu（菲奥娜·于）、Je Kin Ming（余建明）（又名 William Je、Yu Jianming、余建明）、Yaz Qingua（亚兹·青瓜）及 Lao Jiang（姜云浮）（又名 Jiang Yunfu、Jiang Yunfu Be、姜云浮）。\n\n9. “关联实体”系指，单独或合并而言，符合下列任一情形的所有任何类型的组织或实体：(1) 曾由债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或投资；或 (2) 对债务人或债务人家庭成员拥有、控制或享有的任何资产直接或间接享有权益；以及前述各方各自的雇员、代理人、律师、顾问或代表前述任何一方行事的任何人。该等关联实体包括但不限于：7 Nod Hill LLC、AAGV Limited、ACA Investment Management Limited、ACA Capital Group Limited、Ace Decade Holdings Limited、AI Group Holdings Inc.、Alfa Global Ventures Limited、Alfonso Global Limited、Allied Capital Global Limited、Alpine Fiduciaries SA、Anton Development Limited、Assets Sino Limited、Auspicious Coast Limited、Beijing Pangu Investment Co.、Beijing Pangu Investment Co. Ltd.、Beijing Pangu Investment Inc.、Beijing Zenith Holdings Company Limited、Bravo Luck Limited、BSA Strategic Fund I、China Golden Spring (Hong Kong) Limited、Chuang Xin Limited、Crane Advisory Group LLC、Creative Apex Investments Limited、Crystal Breeze Investments Limited、\n\nDawn State Limited、Eastern Profit Corporation Limited、Elite Well Global Limited、Empire Growth Holdings、G Club Operations LLC、G Fashion LLC、G News LLC、GETTR USA、Genever Holdings Corporation、Genever Holdings LLC、GFASHION MEDIA GROUP INC.、GFNY, Inc.、Globalist International Limited、GNews Media Group Inc.、Golden Spring (New York) Ltd.、Greenwich Land LLC、Guo Media、GTV Media Group, Inc.、Hamilton Capital Holdings Inc.、Head Win Group Limited、Henan Yuda、Himalaya Embassy、Himalaya Exchange、Himalaya Federal Reserve、Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd.、Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.、Himalaya International Payments Ltd.、Himalaya International Reserves Ltd.、Himalaya Supervisory Organization、HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited LLC、Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited、Hudson Diamond NY LLC、Infinite Increase Limited、Infinitum Developments Limited、Insight Phoenix Fund、Lamp Capital LLC、Leading Shine Limited、Leading Shine NY Limited、Long Gate Limited、Next Tycoon Investments Limited、New Federal State of China (a/k/a NFSC)、Noble Fame Global Limited、Rosy Acme Ventures Limited、Rule of Law Foundation III, Inc.、Rule of Law Foundation IV, Inc.、Rule of Law Fund、Rule of Law Society、Rule of Law Society IV, Inc.、G-Translators PTY LTD、Saraca Media Group, Inc.、Shiny Ace Ltd.、Shiny Times Holdings Ltd.、Spirit Charter Investment Limited、Stevenson, Wong & Co.、TM Primrose Limited、Voice of Guo Media, Inc.、Well Origin Ltd.、World Century Limited、Worldwide Opportunity Holdings Limited、Whitecroft Shore Limited及ZIBA Limited。\n\n10. “包括”或其任何变体，系指“包括但不限于”。\n\n11. “和”及“或”系指“和/或”，并应为最大限度扩大其范围而按连词和析取词两种方式解释。\n\n12. “任何”及“所有”及“每一”系指“每一及全部”。\n\n13. “每一”及“每个”系指“每一及全部”。\n\n14. “第三方”系指除您本人以外的个人或实体。\n\n15. “转让”应具有《破产法典》第101(54)条赋予该词的含义。\n\n16. “文件”系指属于《联邦民事诉讼规则》第34条范围内的任何信息或物品，并包括但不限于任何种类、类型、性质或描述的、现由或曾由您占有、保管或控制的每一份书面、记录或图形资料，包括电子邮件的所有印刷和电子副本、以电子形式保存的计算机文件、通信函件、备忘录、磁带、速记或手写笔记、任何种类的书面表格、图表、蓝图、图纸、草图、曲线图、计划、文章、规格说明、日记、信函、电报、照片、会议记录、合同、协议、调查资料、计算机打印件、任何种类的数据汇编、电传、传真、电子邮件、短信、即时消息、语音留言、发票、订购单、支票、汇票、对账单、贷项通知单、报告、头寸报告、摘要、索引、账簿、总账、笔记本、附表、透明胶片、录音记录、目录、广告、宣传材料、影片、录像带、录音带、CD、计算机磁盘、小册子、传单、穿孔卡、工时单、推文、社交媒体帖子或任何其他种类的书面或记录材料，以及其所有元数据，无论以何种方式存储（无论以有形或电子形式）、记录、制作或复制；还包括但不限于前述任何文件的草稿或副本，只要其载有原始文件中未见的任何种类的笔记、评论或标记，或在其他方面与原始文件不相同。\n\n17. “个人”系指个人、公司、独资企业、合伙企业、协会或任何其他实体。“个人”还包括任何代理人、代表或专家，包括但不限于律师或财务顾问。\n\n18. “实体”系指任何自然人、公司、合伙企业、子公司、独资企业、商号、董事会、合资企业、协会、机构、主管机关、委员会或其他商业实体或法人，以及任何关联方、代理人、母公司，包括但不限于律师、财务顾问或任何其他代表。\n\n19. “关于”系指涉及、描述、构成、提及、与之相关、支持、有利于、反对、加强、减损、位于其中、结合考虑、对其具有影响、证明、表明、报告、记录、暗示、回应、与之连接、评论、就其而言、有关、与之相关、讨论、展示、描述、反映、分析、构成及属于。\n\n20. 当提及任何特定主题事项时，“与……有关”、“涉及”或“相关”系指，包括但不限于，构成、包括、涉及、包含、体现、反映、识别、陈述、直接或间接提及，或以任何方式与所识别的特定主题事项相关的任何文件。\n\n21. “通信”系指，以最广泛的可能含义且不受限制地，任何信息或知识的传递（以事实、观点、询问或其他形式）。通信还指所有谈话、协议、询问或答复，无论是当面、通过电话、以书面方式，还是借助电子传输设备，并包括但不限于所有函件、电子邮件、录音记录、传送单、备忘录、电话通信、语音留言、电报、电传、影印传真、电传电报、即时消息、聊天、短信、向留言板或群聊发布的内容、社交媒体帖子、推文、上传至任何视频平台的视频、电话笔记，或在内部或与第三方之间传送的笔记。\n\n22. “资产”系指受占有、保管或控制的任何具有经济价值的项目。资产包括所有不动产和动产，包括但不限于不动产、土地、房屋、公寓、共管公寓、汽车、游艇、船只、飞机、喷气式飞机、直升机、现金、银行账户、加密货币、证券、应收账款、存货及其他有形和无形财产。\n\nIV. 应提交的文件\n\n1. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与任何由2004 Discovery Targets（2004 年取证对象）持有、控制、代表其持有或以其他方式与其有关的账户相关的文件，包括任何及所有账户对账单、授权书、委托书、信托、指示或表格、已注销支票副本、函件，以及电汇及相关函件和指示。\n\n2. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与属于任何2004 Discovery Targets、由其持有、控制、代表其持有或以其他方式与其有关的任何资金、证券、财产或资产相关的文件，包括任何及所有账户对账单、授权书、委托书、信托、指示或表格、已注销支票副本、函件，以及电汇及相关函件和指示。\n\n3. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与同任何2004 Discovery Targets进行的任何商业、贸易或金融交易相关的文件，包括但不限于任何贷款、信贷额度、寄托、存款、掉期、证券交易、抵押贷款或ISDA，包括任何及所有账户对账单、授权书、委托书、信托、指示或表格、已注销支票副本、函件，以及电汇及相关函件和指示。\n\n4. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与涉及2004 Discovery Targets的任何电汇活动有关的文件，无论是否存在任何账户，包括但不限于所有电汇收据、账户号码、余额、授权书、与转账当事人有关的身份识别信息、函件、指示或其他记录。\n\n5. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与您和2004 Discovery Targets之间的任何函件和通信有关的文件。\n\n6. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与任何2004 Discovery Target的任何账户有关、涉及该账户的开立、该账户的获授权使用人及该账户维护的文件。\n\n7. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与涉及任何2004 Discovery Targets的任何反洗钱、了解你的客户或其他合规活动有关的文件，包括但不限于任何2004 Discovery Targets提供的或您获知的任何信息。\n\n8. 所有日期介于January 1, 2014至今、与就任何2004 Discovery Targets同任何国家的任何监管机构进行的任何通信有关的文件，包括但不限于英格兰银行、美国联邦储备系统、S.E.C.、CFTC、FINRA、中国证券监督管理委员会、中国人民银行、香港证券及期货事务监察委员会及香港金融管理局。\n\n《联邦民事诉讼规则》第45(c)、(d)、(e)及(g)条（Effective 12/1/13）（依据《联邦破产程序规则》第9016条适用于破产案件）\n\n(c) 履行地点。\n\n(1) 审判、听证或证言录取。传票仅可按如下方式命令某人出席审判、听证或证言录取：\n\n(A) 在该人居住、受雇或经常亲自从事商业交易地点100英里范围内；或\n\n(B) 在该人居住、受雇或经常亲自从事商业交易所在州内，如果该人\n\n(i) 是当事人或当事人的高级职员；或\n\n(ii) 被命令出席审判且不会产生重大费用。\n\n(2) 其他证据开示。传票可以命令：\n\n(A) 在距该人居住、受雇或经常亲自从事商业交易地点100英里范围内的地点提交文件、电子存储信息或物品；以及\n\n(B) 在待检查的场所进行场所检查。\n\n(d) 保护受传票约束之人；执行。\n\n(1) 避免不当负担或费用；制裁。负责签发和送达传票的当事人或律师必须采取合理措施，避免对受传票约束之人施加不当负担或费用。要求履行的地区法院必须执行该义务，并对未遵守者的当事人或律师施加适当制裁，该制裁可包括损失的收入和合理的律师费。\n\n(2) 命令提交材料或允许检查。\n\n（A）无需出庭。被命令出示文件、电子存储信息或有形物品，或者允许检查场所的人，无需亲自到出示或检查地点出庭，除非还被命令为接受证言、听证或审判而出庭。\n\n（B）异议。被命令出示文件或有形物品，或者允许检查的人，可以向传票中指定的当事人或律师送达书面异议，反对检查、复制、测试或抽样任何或全部材料，或者反对检查场所——或反对以所要求的一种或多种形式出示电子存储信息。异议必须在规定的履行时间之前，或在传票送达后14天之前（以较早者为准）送达。提出异议后，适用下列规则：\n\n（i）送达方可随时在通知被命令人的情况下，向要求履行的地区法院提出动议，请求作出强制出示或检查的命令。\n\n（ii）仅可按照命令所指示的方式要求实施这些行为，并且该命令必须保护并非当事人或当事人高级职员的人，使其免受因履行而产生的重大费用。\n\n（3）撤销或修改传票。\n\n（A）必须撤销或修改的情形。经及时提出动议，要求履行的地区法院必须撤销或修改具有下列情形的传票：\n\n（i）未给予合理的履行时间；（ii）要求某人在超出规则45(c)规定的地域限制范围之外履行；\n\n（iii）要求披露享有特权或受其他保护的事项，而不存在任何适用的例外或放弃；或\n\n（iv）使某人承受不当负担。\n\n（B）可以撤销或修改的情形。为保护受传票约束或受其影响的人，要求履行的地区法院可经动议，在传票要求下列事项时撤销或修改该传票：\n\n（i）披露商业秘密或其他保密的研究、开发或商业信息；或\n\n（ii）披露未经聘请的专家的意见或信息，而该等意见或信息并未描述争议中的具体事件，且系该专家进行非由当事人请求的研究所得。\n\n（C）作为替代措施规定条件。在规则45(d)(3)(B)所述情形下，如送达方：\n\n（i）证明其对该证言或材料具有重大需要，且不承受不当困难便无法以其他方式满足该需要；并且\n\n（ii）确保被传唤人将获得合理补偿，\n\n法院可不撤销或修改传票，而命令在指定条件下出庭或出示。\n\n（e）回应传票的义务。\n\n（1）出示文件或电子存储信息。下列程序适用于出示文件或电子存储信息：\n\n（A）文件。回应要求出示文件的传票的人，必须按照该等文件在正常业务过程中保存的方式出示，或者必须对其进行整理和标注，使之与请求中的类别相对应。\n\n（B）未指定电子存储信息出示形式。如传票未指定电子存储信息的出示形式，回应人必须以其通常保存的一种或多种形式，或以合理可用的一种或多种形式出示该信息。\n\n（C）电子存储信息仅需以一种形式出示。回应人无需以多于一种形式出示相同的电子存储信息。\n\n（D）无法合理获取的电子存储信息。回应人无需就其认定为因不当负担或费用而无法合理获取的来源中的电子存储信息提供证据开示。在提出强制证据开示动议或保护令动议时，回应人必须证明该信息因不当负担或费用而无法合理获取。如作出该证明，法院在考虑规则26(b)(2)(C)的限制后，如请求方证明有正当理由，仍可命令从该等来源进行证据开示。法院可为该证据开示规定条件。\n\n（2）主张特权或保护。\n\n（A）被扣留的信息。以享有特权或作为审判准备材料受保护为由扣留传票所要求信息的人，必须：\n\n（i）明确提出该主张；并且\n\n（ii）以一种在不披露本身享有特权或受保护的信息的前提下，足以使各方评估该主张的方式，说明被扣留文件、通信或有形物品的性质。\n\n（B）已出示的信息。如为回应传票而出示的信息被主张享有特权或作为审判准备材料受保护，提出该主张的人可将该主张及其依据通知任何收到该信息的当事人。收到通知后，当事人必须立即返还、隔离或销毁所指定的信息及其持有的任何副本；在该主张得到解决前不得使用或披露该信息；如该当事人在收到通知前已披露该信息，必须采取合理措施取回该信息；并可立即将该信息密封提交给要求履行的地区法院，以裁定该主张。出示该信息的人必须保存该信息，直至该主张得到解决。\n\n……（g）藐视法庭。要求履行的地区法院——以及在动议被移送后，签发传票的法院——可对已被送达但无充分理由不遵守传票或与其相关命令的人，作出藐视法庭认定。\n\n有关传票材料的查阅，请参见《联邦民事诉讼规则》45(a)委员会说明（2013年）\n\nx\n\n关于：　：\n：\n第11章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），　：\n：\n案号：22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。1　：\n：\n关于：ECF No. 839\n\n命令\n准许第11章受托人根据《破产程序规则》2004及地方法则2004-1提出的第一份补充综合动议，以签发命令授权就债务人、与债务人关联的实体及个人的其他法律和财务顾问，以及相关银行进行证据开示\n\n经审议，Luc Despins（吕克·德斯潘），作为债务人财产指定的第11章受托人（“申请人”），提出申请，请求作出命令，授权对其附件B所列被审查人进行《联邦破产程序规则》2004审查（“申请”，ECF No. 637）；在通知及听证后，参见11 U.S.C. § 102(1)，鉴于存在如下文所附条件准许所请求救济的正当理由，现据此\n\n命令：规则2004动议按如下规定获准。\n\n命令：Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩和蒙蒂思律师事务所）作为受托人的律师，现获授权签署实质上类似于作为规则2004动议附件C-1至C-25附具的传票，并依照《破产程序规则》2004向申请附件B所列被审查人送达该等传票及本命令，要求其接受审查并出示文件。\n\n命令：在不影响《联邦破产程序规则》《联邦民事诉讼规则》及适用地方法则项下任何权利的前提下，且除非法院另有命令，被审查人现被命令于传票送达后30日内，或受托人同意的其他期限内，出示全部文件。如被审查人以任何特权为由未出示传票所请求的任何文件，该被审查人现被命令于传票送达后30日内，或受托人同意的其他期限内，向受托人出示符合《联邦民事诉讼规则》\n\n1 尽管债务人的法定名称为Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵），其亦以Guo Wengui（郭文贵）、Miles Guo（郭文贵）及Miles Kwok（郭文贵）以及众多其他别名为人所知。债务人纳税人识别号码的最后四位数字为9595。\n\n45(e)(2)条——该条经《联邦破产程序规则》9016及D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 26(e)适用——要求的特权日志。\n\n命令：被审查人现被命令确保传票所要求的、或以其他方式与债务人、其业务、资产、负债、财务状况或本第11章案件相关的所有文件及其他信息，包括但不限于任何电子格式的信息，均得到妥善保存，可供出示、检查及复制，且不被销毁。\n\n命令：Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩和蒙蒂思律师事务所）作为受托人的律师，现获授权，无需本院进一步命令，即可依照《破产程序规则》2004，通过审查方式，在Neubert, Pepe & Montheith（纽伯特、佩佩和蒙泰思）律师事务所位于195 Church Street, 13th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510的办公室、Paul Hastings LLP（宝盛律师事务所）位于200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166的办公室，或双方共同接受的其他地点，于受托人接受的日期，对申请附件B所列任何被审查人的一名或多名代表进行取证；由受托人选择，该日期应不早于拟议被审查人根据《破产程序规则》2004遵照传票及本命令出示文件后14个日历日，且该审查应逐日继续直至完成。\n\n于2022年9月21日订立于康涅狄格州布里奇波特。\n\n案号22-50073\n文件1303\n提交日期01/06/23\n录入日期01/06/23 16:10:41\n\nx\n\n关于：　：\n：　第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等，　：\n：\n：　案号：22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。　：\n：　（合并管理）\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n［拟议］命令：强制JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.（摩根大通银行）遵守规则2004传票并裁定制裁\n\n经审议，提出动议请求作出命令，强制JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.（摩根大通银行）（“违约回应人”）遵守本院于2022年9月21日作出的《准许第11章受托人根据〈破产程序规则〉2004及地方法则2004-1提出的第一份补充综合动议，以签发命令授权就债务人、与债务人关联的实体及个人的其他法律和财务顾问，以及相关银行进行证据开示的命令》（ECF No. 866，“规则2004命令”），并遵守受托人根据规则2004命令向违约回应人签发的传票（“Chase传票”）；在通知及听证后，参见11 U.S.C. § 102(1)，鉴于存在如下文所附条件准许所请求救济的正当理由，现据此\n\n命令：该动议按如下规定获准。\n\n命令：违约回应人应在本命令录入后十四（14）日内，检索并出示所有对Chase传票具有回应性的文件。\n\n命令：在本命令录入后十四（14）日内，如违约回应人仍未对Chase传票作出回应，违约回应人将构成民事藐视法庭，被禁止对传票提出任何异议，并应支付与本动议相关的受托人律师费。\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（亦称Guo Wengui（郭文贵）、Miles Guo（郭文贵）及Miles Kwok（郭文贵），以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码最后四位数字：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（Genever Holdings有限责任公司）（税务识别号码最后四位数字：8202）及Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever Holdings公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC及Genever Holdings Corporation的邮寄地址为Paul Hastings LLP（宝盛律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，收件人：Luc A. Despins（吕克·A·德斯潘），作为Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）财产的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\nx ： ： ： ： ： ：\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，1\n\n债务人。\n\n案号：22-50073 (JAM)（合并管理）\n\n----------------------------------------------------- x\n争议事项回应日期通知\n\n第11章\n\nLuc A. Despins，作为第11章受托人（“动议方”），已向 United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut（美国康涅狄格地区破产法院）提交《请求作出命令，强制 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.（摩根大通银行，全国协会）遵守第2004条传票的动议》（“争议事项”）。特此通知，任何对该争议事项的答复均须依照《联邦破产程序规则》第2002(a)条和第9014条，最迟于 January 20, 2023 向本院提交。2 如未及时提交答复，该争议事项中的拟议命令可在无需进一步通知及听证的情况下作出，见 11 U.S.C. section 102(1)。\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut（康涅狄格州纽黑文）\n\n日期：January 6, 2023　LUC A. DESPINS，第11章受托人\n\n签署人：/s/Douglas S. Skalka\n\nDouglas S. Skalka（道格拉斯·S·斯卡尔卡，ct00616）　Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛，ct29437）　Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩及蒙蒂思专业公司）　195 Church Street, 13th Floor　New Haven, Connecticut 06510　(203) 821-2000　dskalka@npmlaw.com\n\n1　本第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（吉纳维尔控股有限责任公司）（税务识别号后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（吉纳维尔控股公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（保罗·哈斯廷斯律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，转交 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 遗产的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\n2　根据《联邦破产程序规则》第9006(f)条，如以邮寄方式送达，则在本通知规定的答复日期后增加三日。\n\nx\n\n关于：　：　第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等，　：　案号 22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。　：　（合并管理）\n-----------------------------------------------------　x：\n送达证明\n\n根据《联邦破产程序规则》第\n\n2002条和第7004条的适用规定，下列签署人证明，于 January 6, 2023，下列文件已\n\n通过本院电子提交系统或以第一类邮件方式，向 United States Trustee（美国受托人）及所有出庭当事人\n\n以及送达清单所列的每一当事人送达。\n\nI. 已送达文件\n\n－ 请求作出命令，强制 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 遵守第2004条传票的动议\n－ Patrick R. Linsey 为支持该动议所作的声明\n－ 附件 A\n－ 拟议命令\n－ 争议事项答复日期通知\n\nII. 送达清单\n\na. 电子邮件送达清单\n\n－ Laura Aronsson（劳拉·阿伦松） laronsson@omm.com\n－ Tristan G. Axelrod（特里斯坦·G·阿克塞尔罗德） taxelrod@brownrudnick.com\n－ William R. Baldiga（威廉·R·巴尔迪加） wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com\n－ Kellianne Baranowsky（凯莉安·巴拉诺夫斯基） kbaranowsky@gs-lawfirm.com, aevans@gslawfirm.com;kbaranowsky@ecf.courtdrive.com\n－ Douglass E. Barron（道格拉斯·E·巴伦） douglassbarron@paulhastings.com\n\n1　本第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（吉纳维尔控股有限责任公司）（税务识别号后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（吉纳维尔控股公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（保罗·哈斯廷斯律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，转交 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 遗产的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\n－ Nicholas A. Bassett（尼古拉斯·A·巴西特） nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com, jonathonkosciewicz@paulhastings.com;lucdespins@paulhastings.com;alexbongartz@paulhastings.com;ezrasutton@paulhastings.com;douglassbarron@paulhastings.com;ecf.frg@paulhastings.com;aviluft@paulhastings.com\n－ Patrick M. Birney（帕特里克·M·伯尼） pbirney@rc.com, ctrivigno@rc.com\n－ Christopher H. Blau（克里斯托弗·H·布劳） cblau@zeislaw.com\n－ G. Alexander Bongartz（G·亚历山大·邦加茨） alexbongartz@paulhastings.com\n－ Carollynn H.G. Callari（卡罗琳·H.G. 卡拉里） ccallari@callaripartners.com\n－ Daniel Cantor（丹尼尔·坎托） dcantor@omm.com\n－ John L. Cesaroni（约翰·L·切萨罗尼） jcesaroni@zeislaw.com\n－ Scott M. Charmoy（斯科特·M·查莫伊） scottcharmoy@charmoy.com, ecf-3ae5beb98d9b@ecf.pacerpro.com;charmoysr97992@notify.bestcase.com\n－ Holley L. Claiborn（霍莉·L·克莱伯恩） holley.l.claiborn@usdoj.gov\n－ Samuel Bryant Davidoff（塞缪尔·布莱恩特·达维多夫） sdavidoff@wc.com\n－ Luc A. Despins（吕克·A·德斯平） lucdespins@paulhastings.com, matlaskowski@paulhastings.com;davidmohamed@paulhastings.com\n－ David S. Forsh（戴维·S·福什） dforsh@callaripartners.com\n－ Peter Friedman（彼得·弗里德曼） pfriedman@omm.com\n－ Taruna Garg（塔鲁娜·加格） tgarg@murthalaw.com, mgarcia@murthalaw.com\n－ Irve J. Goldman（欧文·J·戈德曼） igoldman@pullcom.com, rmccoy@pullcom.com\n－ Evan S. Goldstein（埃文·S·戈尔茨坦） egoldstein@uks.com\n－ Mia N. Gonzalez（米娅·N·冈萨雷斯） mgonzalez@omm.com\n－ James C. Graham（詹姆斯·C·格雷厄姆） jgraham@npmlaw.com, sgibbons@npmlaw.com;NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n－ Lawrence S. Grossman（劳伦斯·S·格罗斯曼） LGrossman@gs-lawfirm.com, aevans@gslawfirm.com;ngolino@gslawfirm.com;lawrencegrossman@ecf.courtdrive.com;mbuckanavage@gslawfirm.com;eross@gs-lawfirm.com\n－ David V. Harbach（戴维·V·哈巴赫） dharbach@omm.com\n－ James J. Healy（詹姆斯·J·希利） jhealy@cowderymurphy.com\n－ Jeffrey Hellman（杰弗里·赫尔曼） jeff@jeffhellmanlaw.com, christen@jeffhellmanlaw.com\n－ Eric A. Henzy（埃里克·A·亨齐） ehenzy@zeislaw.com, cjervey@zeislaw.com\n－ Jonathan Kaplan（乔纳森·卡普兰） jkaplan@pullcom.com, prulewicz@pullcom.com;rmccoy@pullcom.com\n－ Stephen M. Kindseth（斯蒂芬·M·金德塞斯） skindseth@zeislaw.com, cjervey@zeislaw.com\n－ Andrew V. Layden（安德鲁·V·莱登） alayden@bakerlaw.com\n－ Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛） plinsey@npmlaw.com, karguello@npmlaw.com;NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n－ Avram Emmanuel Luft（阿夫拉姆·伊曼纽尔·卢夫特） aviluft@paulhastings.com\n－ Kristin B. Mayhew（克里斯汀·B·梅休） kmayhew@pullcom.com, kwarshauer@mdmclaw.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com\n－ Danielle L. Merola（丹妮尔·L·梅罗拉） dmerola@bakerlaw.com\n－ Sherry J. Millman（雪莉·J·米尔曼） smillman@stroock.com\n－ Aaron A Mitchell（阿伦·A·米切尔） aaron@lmesq.com\n－ James M. Moriarty（詹姆斯·M·莫里亚蒂） jmoriarty@zeislaw.com, cgregory@zeislaw.com\n－ Sara Pahlavan（萨拉·帕拉万） spahlavan@omm.com\n－ Patrick N. Petrocelli（帕特里克·N·彼得罗切利） ppetrocelli@stroock.com\n－ Lucas Bennett Rocklin（卢卡斯·贝内特·罗克林） lrocklin@npmlaw.com, NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n－ Aaron Romney（阿伦·罗姆尼） aromney@zeislaw.com, swenthen@zeislaw.com\n－ Scott D. Rosen（斯科特·D·罗森） srosen@cb-shea.com, msullivan@cbshealaw.com;dtempera@cbshealaw.com\n－ Thomas J. Sansone（托马斯·J·桑索内） tsansone@carmodylaw.com\n－ Stuart M. Sarnoff（斯图尔特·M·萨诺夫） ssarnoff@omm.com, stuart-sarnoff-1059@ecf.pacerpro.com\n－ David M.S. Shaiken（戴维·M.S. 沙伊肯） david@shipmanlawct.com\n－ Douglas S. Skalka（道格拉斯·S·斯卡尔卡） dskalka@npmlaw.com, smowery@npmlaw.com;NeubertPepeMonteithPC@jubileebk.net\n－ Jeffrey M. Sklarz（杰弗里·M·斯克拉茨） jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com, aevans@gslawfirm.com;mbuckanavage@gs-lawfirm.com;eross@gslawfirm.com;jsklarz@ecf.courtdrive.com\n－ Annecca H. Smith（安妮卡·H·史密斯） asmith@rc.com\n－ John Troy（约翰·特洛伊） johntroy@troypllc.com\n－ Tiffany Troy（蒂芙尼·特洛伊） troylegalpllc@gmail.com, troylaw@troypllc.com\n－ U. S. Trustee（美国受托人） USTPRegion02.NH.ECF@USDOJ.GOV\n－ Stephen G. Walko（斯蒂芬·G·沃科） swalko@ibolaw.com\n－ Michael S. Weinstein（迈克尔·S·温斯坦） mweinstein@golenbock.com\n－ Jay Marshall Wolman（杰伊·马歇尔·沃尔曼） jmw@randazza.com, ecf-6898@ecf.pacerpro.com\n－ Peter J. Zarella（彼得·J·扎雷拉） pzarella@mdmc-law.com\n\nb. 通过 USPS 以第一类邮件、邮资预付方式人工送达：\n\nBrown Rudnick LLP（布朗·鲁德尼克律师事务所）　收件人：总裁或总经理　One Financial Center　Boston, MA 02111\n\nChao-Chih Chiu（邱昭志）、Huizhen Wang（王慧珍）、Yunxia Wu（吴云霞）、Keyi Zilkie（凯伊·齐尔基）　转交 TroyGould PC（特洛伊·古尔德专业公司）　1801 Century Park East, 16th Floor　收件人：Christopher A. Lilly（克里斯托弗·A·莉莉）　Los Angeles, CA 90067-2367\n\nGregory A. Coleman（格雷戈里·A·科尔曼）　Coleman Worldwide Advisors, LLC（科尔曼全球顾问有限责任公司）　P O Box 2839　New York, NY 10008-2839\n\nJ. Ted Donovan（J·泰德·多诺万）、Kevin J. Nash（凯文·J·纳什）　Goldberg Weprin Finkel Goldstein LLP（戈德堡·韦普林·芬克尔·戈尔茨坦律师事务所）　1501 Broadway　22nd Floor　New York, NY 10036\n\nDundon Advisers LLC（邓登顾问有限责任公司）　收件人：总裁或总经理　10 Bank Street, Suite 1100　White Plains, NY 10606\n\nPeter M. Friedman（彼得·M·弗里德曼）　O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP（奥美律师事务所）　1625 Eye Street, NW　Washington, DC 20006\n\nFrancis J. Lawall（弗朗西斯·J·劳沃尔）　Pepper Hamilton LLP（佩珀·汉密尔顿律师事务所）　3000 Two Logan Square　18th & Arch Street　Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799\n\nSteven E. Mackey（史蒂文·E·麦基）　Office of the U.S. Trustee（美国受托人办公室）　The Giaimo Federal Building　150 Court Street, Room 302　New Haven, CT 06510\n\nSherry Millman（雪莉·米尔曼）　Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP（斯特鲁克、斯特鲁克及拉文律师事务所）　180 Maiden Lane　New York, NY 10038\n\nRichard C. Morrissey（理查德·C·莫里西）　Office of the U.S. Trustee（美国受托人办公室）　201 Varick Street, Room 1006　New York, NY 10014\n\nEdward Moss（爱德华·莫斯）、Diana Perez（戴安娜·佩雷斯）、Stuart Sarnoff（斯图尔特·萨诺夫）和 Daniel Shamah（丹尼尔·沙玛）　O'Melveny & Myers LLP（奥美律师事务所）　7 Times Square　New York, NY 10036\n\nAlissa M. Nann（阿丽莎·M·南）　Foley & Lardner LLP（富理律师事务所）　90 Park Avenue　New York, NY 10016\n\nIrve Goldman, Esq.（欧文·戈德曼律师）　Pullman & Comley, LLC（普尔曼及康利有限责任公司）　850 Main Street　Bridgeport, CT 06601\n\nGabriel Sasson（加布里埃尔·萨松）　Paul Hastings LLP（保罗·哈斯廷斯律师事务所）　200 Park Avenue　New York, NY 10166\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut（康涅狄格州纽黑文）\n\nDouglas E. Spelfogel（道格拉斯·E·斯佩尔福格尔）　Derek L. Wright（德里克·L·赖特）　Mayer Brown LLP（美博律师事务所）　1221 Avenue of the Americas　New York, NY 10020-1001\n\nStretto（斯特雷托）　收件人：总裁或总经理　410 Exchange, Suite 100　Irvine, CA 92602\n\nYongbing Zhang（张永兵）　223 West Jackson Blvd. #1012　Chicago, IL 60606\n\nGenever Holdings Corporation（吉纳维尔控股公司）　P.O. Box 3170　Road Town　Tortola, BVI\n\nGenever Holdings LLC（吉纳维尔控股有限责任公司）　781 Fifth Avenue Apt. 1801　New York, NY 10022-5520\n\nJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.（摩根大通银行，全国协会）　收件人：总裁或总经理　2125 Main Street　Bridgeport, CT 06606\n\n日期：January 6, 2023　LUC A. DESPINS，第11章受托人\n\n签署人：/s/Douglas S. Skalka　Douglas S. Skalka（道格拉斯·S·斯卡尔卡，ct00616）　Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛，ct29437）　Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩及蒙蒂思专业公司）　195 Church Street, 13th Floor　New Haven, Connecticut 06510　(203) 821-2000　dskalka@npmlaw.com","key_entities":["Je","Kwok","Guo","Ho Wan Kwok","Despins","Himalaya","Miles Guo","Paul Hastings","William Je","Luc Despins","GTV","Saraca","Yanping Wang","Finkel","Himalaya Exchange","GETTR"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":637,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":839,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":866,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":10563,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-09-21 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-09-21","updated_at":"2026-08-23 21:26:43"}