{"id":"court_ctb_1328_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":1328,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":null,"title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION | -------------------------------------------","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"# **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>x |             |                         |  |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|-------------------------|--|\n| In re:                                                           | :<br>:      | Chapter 11              |  |\n| HO WAN KWOK, et al.,                                             | :<br>:<br>: | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |  |\n| Debtors.1                                                        | :<br>:      | Jointly Administered    |  |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>x |             |                         |  |\n\n# **CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER SEALING EXHIBIT A TO OBJECTION TO DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR ORDER REMOVING TRUSTEE AND RELATED RELIEF**\n\nLuc A. Despins, as the Chapter 11 Trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in debtor Ho Wan Kwok's (the \"Debtor\") chapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\"), by and through his undersigned counsel, pursuant to District of Connecticut Local Rule of Civil Procedure (the \"Local Civil Rules\") 5(e), District of Connecticut Local Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the \"Local Bankruptcy Rules\") 7007-2 and 9077-1, and the Protective Order entered October 6, 2022 [ECF No. 923] (the \"Protective Order\") in the Chapter 11 Case, hereby moves (the \"Motion to Seal\") for entry of the proposed order filed herewith preserving the confidentiality and the safety of a crucial witness by permitting the sealed filing of Exhibit A (the \"Confidential Exhibit\") to the Trustee's Objection [ECF No. 1326] (the \"Removal Objection\") to the Debtor's *Motion for Order Removing Trustee*  [Docket No. 1274] (the \"Removal Motion\") and restricting disclosure of this document and\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595) (the \"Debtor\") and Genever Holdings Corporation (\"Genever BVI\"). The mailing address for the Trustee and Genever BVI is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\ninformation contained therein, including the witness's identity, to certain counsel for the Debtor. In support of his Motion to Seal, the Trustee states as follows:\n\n#### **RELEVANT FACTS**\n\n1. The Debtor filed his Removal Motion on December 30, 2022.\n\n2. On January 13, 2023, the Trustee filed his Removal Objection on the public docket, except for the Confidential Exhibit, which the Trustee has filed under seal pursuant to this Motion to Seal [ECF No. 1327].\n\n3. The Confidential Exhibit is a declaration obtained by the Trustee during his investigation from a witness who has knowledge and information supporting the Trustee's counterclaims in the HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC adversary proceeding [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003] (the \"HK Adversary Proceeding\").\n\n4. The Confidential Exhibit is also highly relevant to the Trustee's Removal Objection, inasmuch as it constitutes one of the prime fruits of the Trustee's ongoing investigation of the Debtor's financial affairs and reflects progress in the Trustee's efforts to recover assets that properly belong to the chapter 11 estate.\n\n5. The declarant who swore to the Confidential Exhibit has expressed concern for the declarant's personal safety in the event that the contents of the Confidential Exhibit and/or the declarant's identity is disclosed to the Debtor, his relatives, his associates, or his counsel and advisors other than those described herein. 2\n\n6. The Trustee shares the declarant's concerns in light of, among other things, the Debtor's conduct in this case toward the Trustee and his professionals and the Court's recent finding that the Debtor's pattern of harassing and intimidating conduct \"is having a chilling effect\n\n<sup>2</sup> This Motion to Stay employs gender-neutral pronouns to preserve the declarant's confidentiality and thus their safety.\n\non potential witnesses and creditors in these cases.\" (Memorandum of Decision Granting in Part Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032 (the \"Injunction Proceeding\") ECF No. 128] (Jan. 11, 2023) (the \"Injunction Decision\").)\n\n7. The Protective Order provides for documents and information to designated as \"Highly Confidential Material,\" including where their disclosure may threaten personal safety. (Protective Order at ¶ 5(b).) Under the Protective Order, even parties who are entitled to obtain Highly Confidential Material may not review it themselves; rather access is restricted to their counsel (*i.e.*, the \"AEO Provision\"). (Protective Order at ¶ 10(a).)\n\n8. Earlier today, counsel for the Trustee conferred with counsel for the Debtor at Zeisler and Zeisler, P.C. (\"Z&Z\") and Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC (\"CSG\"), *i.e.*, the Debtor's counsel with respect to the Removal Motion and the HK Adversary Proceeding, and requested consent that the Confidential Exhibit be shared solely with counsel for the Debtor at Z&Z and CSG and withheld from further disclosure, including to the Debtor's other professionals, *e.g.*, Aaron Mitchell (\"Attorney Mitchell\") and Melissa B. Francis (\"Attorney Francis\").\n\n9. Attorney Mitchell and Attorney Francis have served as close advisors to the Debtor on a variety of matters, including matters unrelated to this Chapter 11 Case, and for time periods that began well before the commencement of this case. By contrast, it is the Trustee's understanding that Z&Z and CSG are serving as outside counsel to the Debtor only in connection with this case. Thus, the need for Z&Z and CSG to have access to Confidential Exhibit differs from that of any other counsel, including Attorney Mitchell and Attorney Francis.\n\n10. Counsel for the Trustee conferred with Z&Z and CSG prior to filing this motion; however, they have not yet provided a response with their positions.\n\n3\n\n#### **THE COURT SHOULD SEAL THE CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBIT AND LIMIT ITS DISCLOSURE TO COUNSEL FOR THE DEBTOR AT Z&Z AND CSG**\n\n11. It is essential that the Trustee be able to use the Confidential Exhibit both in the context of the HK Adversary Proceeding (where evidentiary proceedings will commence next month) and in the context of the Debtor's Removal Motion and the Trustee's Removal Objection. The Confidential Exhibit reflects both the potency of the Trustee's claims and of his investigation. The Trustee's use of the Confidential Exhibit, however, should not come at the cost of jeopardizing anyone's personal safety.\n\n12. The limitations on disclosure the Trustee requests are reasonable and within this Court's authority. Local Civil Rule 5(e), applicable to the contested matter (*i.e.*, the Removal Motion) pursuant to Local Bankruptcy Rule 9077-1, provides for the Court to permit the filing of documents and information under seal where circumstances warrant. This Court has already approved appropriate limitations upon disclosure, including the AEO Provision in the Protective Order, where personal safety is at stake.\n\n13. Here, the declarant of the Confidential Exhibit has expressed credible concerns about risks to the declarant's safety if the Confidential Exhibit is disseminated to the Debtor. These concerns are more than justified given the record in this case, including the recent Injunction Decision, which makes clear that publicizing the identity of witnesses who provide information useful to the Trustee's investigation could result in misconduct by the Debtor, and those allied with him, such as protests, doxing, and other harassment, that will discourage other potential witnesses from coming forward or from otherwise cooperating in this case.\n\n14. The Trustee understands that the Debtor's counsel may take the position that, under the Protective Order as it currently exists, any outside counsel (including Attorney Mitchell and Attorney Francis) may see the document if it is designated Highly Confidential under the\n\n4\n\nProtective Order. Under the circumstances, however, given the gravity of the concerns at stake, the Trustee believes it is critical that the Confidential Exhibit (as well as its content and the identity of the declarant) be provided *only* to attorneys at Z&Z and CSG. No other counsel, advisors, or other persons have a need for this information—and certainly not one that trumps the harm to personal safety that could occur if the information is disclosed to the Debtor or others.\n\n15. Accordingly, the Trustee requests that the Court approve the filing of the Confidential Exhibit under seal and that the Court order that the dissemination of the Confidential Exhibit, as well as its subject matter and any information contained therein, including the identity of the declarant (together, the \"Confidential Material\"), be limited to (a) the Trustee and the Trustee's counsel; (b) the Debtor's counsel at Z&Z and CSG; and (c) the Court and its staff (the \"Confidential Parties\").\n\n16. The Court has already approved restriction with respect to Highly Confidential Material in its Protective Order, and the circumstances here warrant further restriction to preserve the declarant's personal safety. The relief requested by this Motion is narrowly tailored to serve these important interests. *See* Local Civil Rule 5(e). Likewise, the facts and circumstances discussed above, and, in particular, the risk to the declarant's personal safety, support further restricting disclosure of the Confidential Material to the Confidential Parties.\n\n*[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK]*\n\nWHEREFORE, the Court should grant this Motion to Seal, approve the sealed filing of the\n\nConfidential Exhibit as provided in the Proposed Order, restrict disclosure of the Confidential Material to the Confidential Parties, and grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.\n\nDated: January 13, 2023 LUC A. DESPINS,\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: */s/ Patrick R. Linsey*\n\nDouglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n*and*\n\nNicholas A. Bassett *(pro hac vice* pending) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n*and*\n\nAvram E. Luft *(pro hac vice* pending) Douglass Barron (*pro hac vice* pending) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6079 aviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n*Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>x |        |                         |  |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--|\n| In re:                                                           | :<br>: | Chapter 11              |  |\n| HO WAN KWOK, et al.,                                             | :<br>: | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |  |\n|                                                                  | :      |                         |  |\n| Debtors.1                                                        | :<br>: | Jointly Administered    |  |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------      | x      |                         |  |\n\n## **[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER SEALING EXHIBIT A TO OBJECTION TO DEBTOR'S MOTION FOR ORDER REMOVING TRUSTEE AND RELATED RELIEF**\n\nUPON CONSIDERATION OF the motion (the \"Motion to Seal\") of Chapter 11 Trustee Luc A. Despins (the \"Trustee\") requesting approval of the sealed filing of the Confidential Exhibit; and good cause having been shown, and the Court having found that the disclosure of the Confidential Exhibit, as well as its subject matter and any information contained therein, including the identity of the declarant (together, the \"Confidential Material\"),<sup>2</sup> could prejudice the Debtor's estate (the \"Estate\"), by threatening the declarant of the Confidential Exhibit's personal safety and by discouraging third parties from cooperating in the Trustee's investigation, the Court having found that the filing of Confidential Exhibit under seal is consistent with relevant parties' agreements and expectations under the Protective Order, the relief provided in this Order being\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595) (the \"Debtor\") and Genever Holdings Corporation (\"Genever BVI\"). The mailing address for the Trustee and Genever BVI is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<sup>2</sup> Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Order shall adopted the definitions set forth in the Motion to Seal.\n\nnarrowly tailored to serve the foregoing purposes, and good cause having thereby and otherwise been shown, it is by the Court, hereby\n\nORDERED, that the Motion is granted as set forth herein; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Court approves the filing of the Confidential Exhibit under seal and the Confidential Exhibit shall remain under seal; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that access to the Confidential Exhibit and the Confidential Material is limited to (a) the Trustee and his counsel, (b) the Debtor's counsel at Z&Z and CSG, and (c) the Court and its staff (the \"Confidential Parties\"); and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Trustee shall serve the Debtor with a copy of the Confidential Exhibit by transmitting the Confidential Exhibit to the Debtor's counsel at Z&Z and CSG; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Debtor's counsel at Z&Z and CSG are prohibited from disclosing the Confidential Exhibit or the Confidential Material to any persons who are not Confidential Parties, including, without limitation, the Debtor's other counsel or professionals or the Debtor himself.","body_zh":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\nx\n\n关于：\n第 11 章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，\n案件编号：22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。1\n合并审理\n\nx\n第 11 章受托人请求作出对针对债务人请求撤换受托人及相关救济的动议的异议书附件 A 予以封存的命令的动议\n\nLuc A. Despins（吕克·A·德斯平斯）作为在债务人 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（以下简称“债务人”）的第 11 章破产案件（以下简称“第 11 章案件”）中被指定的第 11 章受托人（以下简称“受托人”），通过其下述署名律师，依据《District of Connecticut Local Rule of Civil Procedure（康涅狄格区民事诉讼地方规则）》（以下简称《地方民事规则》）第 5(e) 条、《District of Connecticut Local Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure（康涅狄格区破产诉讼地方规则）》（以下简称《地方破产规则》）第 7007-2 条和第 9077-1 条，以及在第 11 章案件中于 2022 年 10 月 6 日作出的《保护令》[ECF No. 923]（以下简称《保护令》），特此提出动议（以下简称“封存动议”），请求作出随本动议一并提交的拟议命令，通过准许对受托人对债务人请求撤换受托人的动议 [Docket No. 1274]（以下简称“撤换动议”）的异议书 [ECF No. 1326]（以下简称“撤换异议书”）之附件 A（以下简称“机密附件”）进行封存归档，并限制该文件及\n\n1 这些第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 及 Miles Kwok，以及其他众多化名）（纳税人识别号后四位：9595）（以下简称“债务人”）和 Genever Holdings Corporation（以下简称“Genever BVI”）。受托人和 Genever BVI 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（普衡律师事务所）, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok（仅用于接收通知和联络）。\n\n其中所含信息（包括证人身份）仅向债务人的特定律师披露，以保护关键证人的机密性和人身安全。为支持其封存动议，受托人陈述如下：\n相关事实\n\n1. 债务人于 2022 年 12 月 30 日提交了其撤换动议。\n\n2. 2023 年 1 月 13 日，受托人在公开案卷中提交了其撤换异议书，但机密附件除外，受托人已依据本封存动议 [ECF No. 1327] 将该机密附件封存归档。\n\n3. 该机密附件是受托人在其调查期间从一名证人处取得的声明书，该证人掌握支持受托人在 HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC 对抗性诉讼 [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]（以下简称“HK 对抗性诉讼”）中反诉的知识和信息。\n\n4. 该机密附件亦与受托人的撤换异议书高度相关，因为它构成了受托人对债务人财务状况进行持续调查的主要成果之一，并反映了受托人在追回正当属于第 11 章破产财产的资产方面所取得的进展。\n\n5. 宣誓签署该机密附件的声明人已表示对声明人的人身安全感到担忧，以防机密附件的内容和/或声明人的身份被披露给债务人、其亲属、其关联人员，或本文所述之外的债务人律师和顾问。2\n\n6. 鉴于债务人在本案中对受托人及其专业人员的行为，以及法院最近作出的债务人持续骚扰和恐吓的模式“正在对\n\n2 本中止动议采用性别中立代词以维护声明人的机密性并从而保护其安全。\n\n这些案件中的潜在证人和债权人产生寒蝉效应”的认定等情况，受托人与该声明人持有相同的担忧。（部分准许初步禁令动议的决定备忘录 [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032（以下简称“禁令诉讼”）ECF No. 128]（2023 年 1 月 11 日）（以下简称《禁令决定》）。）\n\n7. 《保护令》规定可将文件和信息指定为“高度机密材料”，包括在披露可能威胁人身安全的情形下。（《保护令》第 5(b) 段。）根据《保护令》，即使是有权获取高度机密材料的当事人本身也不得审查该等材料；相反，查阅权限仅限于其律师（即“仅限律师查阅条款”）。（《保护令》第 10(a) 段。）\n\n8. 今天早些时候，受托人的律师与债务人在 Zeisler and Zeisler, P.C.（以下简称“Z&Z”）及 Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC（以下简称“CSG”）的律师（即债务人就撤换动议及 HK 对抗性诉讼聘请的律师）进行了磋商，并请求同意机密附件仅与债务人在 Z&Z 和 CSG 的律师共享，并拒绝对外进一步披露，包括向债务人的其他专业人员（例如 Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔律师，以下简称“米切尔律师”）和 Melissa B. Francis（梅丽莎·B·弗朗西斯律师，以下简称“弗朗西斯律师”））披露。\n\n9. 米切尔律师和弗朗西斯律师在多项事务上担任债务人的亲密顾问，包括与本第 11 章案件无关的事务，且其担任顾问的时间早在本案启动之前即已开始。相比之下，受托人理解 Z&Z 和 CSG 仅就本案担任债务人的外部律师。因此，Z&Z 和 CSG 查阅机密附件的必要性不同于任何其他律师（包括米切尔律师和弗朗西斯律师）。\n\n10. 受托人的律师在提交本动议前已与 Z&Z 和 CSG 进行了磋商；然而，他们尚未就其立场作出答复。\n\n法院应当封存机密附件并将其披露范围限制为债务人在 Z&Z 和 CSG 的律师\n\n11. 受托人必须能够在 HK 对抗性诉讼的背景下（该诉讼的证据听证程序将于下个月开始）以及在债务人的撤换动议和受托人的撤换异议书的背景下使用机密附件。机密附件既反映了受托人主张的说服力，也反映了其调查的力度。然而，受托人使用机密附件不应以危及任何人的个人安全为代价。\n\n12. 受托人请求的披露限制是合理的，且属于本法院的管辖权范围内。根据《地方破产规则》第 9077-1 条适用于该争议事项（即撤换动议）的《地方民事规则》第 5(e) 条规定，在情况需要时，法院可准许将文件和信息封存归档。在涉及个人安全受到威胁的情况下，本法院已经批准了对披露的适当限制，包括《保护令》中的仅限律师查阅条款。\n\n13. 在本案中，机密附件的声明人对如果机密附件传播给债务人则可能对声明人的安全造成风险表示了合理信服的担忧。鉴于本案的记录，包括最近的《禁令决定》，这些担忧是非常合理的；《禁令决定》明确表明，公开向受托人调查提供有用信息的证人身份，可能会导致债务人及其同盟的不当行为，如抗议、人肉搜索（doxing）和其他骚扰，这将阻碍其他潜在证人站出来或以其他方式在本案中配合。\n\n14. 受托人理解，债务人的律师可能会主张，根据现行《保护令》，如果该文件根据《保护令》被指定为高度机密，任何外部律师（包括米切尔律师和弗朗西斯律师）均可查看该文件。然而，鉴于相关担忧的严重性，在当前情况下，受托人认为至关重要的是，机密附件（及其内容和声明人的身份）仅提供给 Z&Z 和 CSG 的律师。没有其他律师、顾问或其他人员有获取该信息的需求——当然绝没有任何需求能够压倒如果向债务人或其他人披露该信息可能对个人安全造成的危害。\n\n15. 因此，受托人请求法院批准将机密附件封存归档，并请求法院下令机密附件的传播及其标的物和其中包含的任何信息，包括声明人的身份（合称“机密材料”），仅限于 (a) 受托人和受托人的律师；(b) 债务人在 Z&Z 和 CSG 的律师；以及 (c) 法院及其工作人员（以下简称“机密当事方”）。\n\n16. 法院已在其《保护令》中批准了针对高度机密材料的限制，本案的情形需要进一步限制以保护声明人的人身安全。本动议所请求的救济针对服务于这些重要利益进行了严格限定。参见《地方民事规则》第 5(e) 条。同样，上述讨论的事实和情况，特别是对声明人人身安全的风险，支持进一步将机密材料的披露限制于机密当事方。\n\n[本页余下部分有意留白]\n\n为此，法院应当准许本封存动议，按照拟议命令的规定批准机密附件的封存归档，将机密材料的披露限制于机密当事方，并给予法院认为公正和适当的其他及进一步救济。\n\n日期：2023 年 1 月 13 日 LUC A. DESPINS（吕克·A·德斯平斯），\n\n康涅狄格州纽黑文 第 11 章受托人\n\n签署人：/s/ Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛）\n\nDouglas S. Skalka（道格拉斯·S·斯卡尔卡）(ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛）(ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n以及\n\nNicholas A. Bassett（尼古拉斯·A·巴塞特）（特许出庭代理申请审理中）PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n以及\n\nAvram E. Luft（阿夫拉姆·E·卢夫特）（特许出庭代理申请审理中）Douglass Barron（道格拉斯·巴伦）（特许出庭代理申请审理中）PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6079 aviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n第 11 章受托人律师\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION\n\nx\n\n关于：\n第 11 章\nHO WAN KWOK 等，\n案件编号：22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。1\n合并审理\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n[拟议] 准许第 11 章受托人请求作出对针对债务人请求撤换受托人及相关救济的动议的异议书附件 A 予以封存的命令的动议的命令\n\n经审议第 11 章受托人 Luc A. Despins（以下简称“受托人”）请求批准将机密附件封存归档的动议（以下简称“封存动议”）；且已证明有充分理由，并且法院认定披露机密附件及其标的物和其中包含的任何信息（包括声明人的身份）（合称“机密材料”）2，可能会因威胁机密附件声明人的人身安全以及阻碍第三方配合受托人的调查而损害债务人的破产财产（以下简称“破产财产”），法院认定将机密附件封存归档符合《保护令》下相关当事方的协议和预期，本命令中提供的救济\n\n1 这些第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 及 Miles Kwok，以及其他众多化名）（纳税人识别号后四位：9595）（以下简称“债务人”）和 Genever Holdings Corporation（以下简称“Genever BVI”）。受托人和 Genever BVI 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok（仅用于接收通知和联络）。\n\n2 本命令中未作定义的以大写字母开头的术语应采用封存动议中规定的定义。\n\n系为达到前述目的而作出的严格限定，且因此及在其他方面已表明具有正当理由，特此由法院\n\n裁定，按本裁定所载准予该动议；并进一步\n\n裁定，法院批准在盖印封存状态下提交保密证物（Confidential Exhibit），且该保密证物应保持盖印封存；并进一步\n\n裁定，对保密证物及保密材料（Confidential Material）的查阅权限仅限于：(a) 受托人（Trustee）及其律师，(b) 债务人（Debtor）在 Z&Z 和 CSG 的律师，以及 (c) 法院及其工作人员（统称「保密方」[Confidential Parties]）；并进一步\n\n裁定，受托人应通过向债务人在 Z&Z 和 CSG 的律师发送保密证物的方式，向债务人送达保密证物的副本；并进一步\n\n裁定，禁止债务人在 Z&Z 和 CSG 的律师向非保密方的任何人员披露保密证物或保密材料，包括但不限于债务人的其他律师或专业人员，或债务人本人。","key_entities":["Je","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Despins","Guo","Paul Hastings","Miles Guo"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":128,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":923,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":1326,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":1327,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":2088,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 13:11:08"}