{"id":"court_ctb_163_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":163,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"PETITION","filed_date":null,"title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION In re Chapter 11","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n**In re Chapter 11**\n\n**HO WAN KWOK Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) a/k/a WENGUI GUO a/k/a MILES GUO,**\n\n **Debtor. Re: ECF 87 & 143**\n\n# **UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S STATEMENT OF OBJECTION CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE DEBTOR'S APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION TO RETAIN AND EMPLOY STRETTO AS CLAIMS AND NOTICING AGENT**\n\nWilliam K. Harrington, the United States Trustee for Region 2 (\"United States Trustee\"),\n\nin furtherance of his duties and responsibilities set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 586(a)(3), respectfully\n\nfiles this statement of objection concerning the Debtor's Application for Authorization to Retain\n\nand Employ Stretto as Claims and Noticing Agent (\"Application\"). ECF 87 and 143. In support\n\nof his statement of objection, the United States Trustee, through his undersigned counsel,\n\nrespectfully represents and states the following:\n\n## **FACTS**\n\n1. The Debtor, also known as Wengui Guo, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases, filed a voluntary chapter 11 petition (\"Petition\") on February 15, 2022. ECF 1.\n\n2. The Debtor is currently managing his financial affairs and his business interests pursuant to Sections 1107 and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n3. On March 21, 2022, the United States Trustee appointed an Official Committee of\n\nUnsecured Creditors (\"Committee\") in this case. ECF 108. To date, the Committee has not filed an application to employ counsel.\n\n4. As of the present time, it appears that the Debtor has fewer than sixty (60) creditors of all types. *See* current creditor matrix/mailing information. It also appears that, not counting the United States Trustee, fifteen (15) attorneys receive ECF electronic notice/service of filings and copies of documents. *Id*.\n\n5. On March 16, 2022, the Debtor filed the Application seeking to employ Stretto, Inc. (\"Stretto\") to perform a wide range of services including noticing and claims processing pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 156(c). ECF 87. The Application was supplemented with an \"enhanced\" Stretto Services Agreement which included a \"price list\" for services. ECF 143.\n\n6. The Application is also supported by the Declaration of Sheryl Betance (\"Betance Declaration\"). ECF 87, pages 33 – 40.\n\n7. The Application fails to adequately support the need for Stretto's proposed services either presently or in the future given the Debtor's very modest number of creditors.\n\n8. Neither the Application itself or in the Betance Declaration explains why a \"noticing\" and/or \"claims\" agent is necessary in the Debtor's Chapter 11 case. ECF 87. The Application uses \"catch-phrases\" such as: \"voluminous mailings and cites a lengthy chain of case citations to support the need for a \"noticing and claims agent\" where those Chapter 11 cases had many hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of creditors and other notice parties. ECF 87, ¶ 9. Although it relies on Chapter 11 cases with many hundreds and even thousands of creditors, the Application is silent concerning the need for such an \"agent\" where, as here, the Debtor has a very manageable fewer than five dozen creditors and where a mere fifteen (15) parties receive\n\nelectronic notice.\n\n### **Noticing**\n\n9. The act of providing notice to creditors through the: addressing of envelopes, copying documents, stuffing envelopes, attaching appropriate postage, and mailing those envelopes in a clerical function easily accomplished by even the most modestly competent debtors' law firm. A law firm such as Brown Rudnick should have no difficulty providing such services without the assistance of an outside agent. Service upon sixty (60) creditors or fewer is routinely accomplished by Chapter 7 trustees and debtors' counsel in all chapters within the District of Connecticut without the need of a \"noticing\" and/or \"claims\" agent. Neither the Application nor the Betance Declaration provides adequate support of the *need* for the \"retention\" and employment of Stretto as a noticing agent.\n\n#### **Claims**\n\n10. Admittedly, the burden of processing the claims of many hundreds or even thousands of claims can be draining upon the usually-limited resources of the Bankruptcy Court Clerk. There are certainly instances where it is appropriate to shift the cost and logistics burden of administering the noticing, ballot-collection/analysis, and claims processing from the Bankruptcy Clerk to the Debtor through the use of a \"noticing and claims agent.\" However, the Debtor's case does not seem to be such a case where fewer than sixty (60) creditors are present and ECF electronic notice presently goes out to fifteen (15) attorneys. The Bankruptcy Court Clerk's Office routinely handles noticing and claims processing for Chapter 11 cases with similar and even substantially larger creditor bodies. Neither the Application nor the Betance Declaration has provided support for the *need* for the \"retention\" and employment of Stretto as a claims processing agent.\n\n3\n\n### **Other Issues**\n\n11. Should the Court determine that the employment of Stretto is appropriate, there\n\nare a few issues that should be addressed:\n\n(a) Paragraph 3 of the Stretto Services Agreement provides that Stretto will continue to provide services should this case be converted to Chapter 7. The cost of Stretto's services is not a cost that a Chapter 7 estate should have to absorb. Upon conversion to Chapter 7, Stretto's services should automatically terminate. ECF 143, ¶ 3.\n\n(b) Paragraph 10 of the Stretto Services Agreement provides that the Debtor will \"indemnify and hold harmless Stretto and its members, directors, officers, employees, representatives, affiliates, consultants, subcontractors, and agents (collectively, the 'Indemnified Parties').\" Stretto has provided no consideration for such a provision, and it is inappropriate to be include such a provision in the services agreement for a party who proposes to provide the services described in the Application. ECF 143, ¶ 9.\n\n(c) Paragraph 10 of the Stretto Services Agreement provides a limitation of liability and limits Stretto's liability to the amount of money it receives for its services that gives rise to the loss. Stretto has provided no consideration for such a limitation of liability provision. The provision is inappropriate and should be removed. ECF 143, ¶ 10.\n\n### **CONCLUSION**\n\nWith the Debtor's very modest creditor body, the employment of Stretto seems to be solely for the convenience of the Debtor and his counsel which would otherwise have the responsibility to provide a very normal volume of noticing services for the Debtor. It doesn't appear that the Bankruptcy Court Clerk's Office would be inconvenienced by performing its usual claims collection and processing function. What does seem apparent is the shifting of the cost for possibly unreimbursed clerical services by Debtor's counsel to Stretto to generate an ongoing and evergreen administrative expense claim giving its services priority in payment and displacing the pre-petition claims of existing priority and general unsecured creditors. The\n\nApplication has not sustained the burden of establishing that the proposed administrative expense of employing Stretto is actually *necessary*, at least at this time and at the present stage of Debtor's case. Further, the issues raised in ¶ 11 above need to be addressed by the Debtor prior to or at the hearing on the Application.\n\n**WHEREFORE**, for all of the foregoing reasons, the United States Trustee respectfully requests that the Court deny the Application without prejudice, or, in the alternative, defer determination until such time as the Application is supplemented and/or revised to provide the support necessary to adequately address the issues raised herein.\n\nDated: April 6, 2022 Respectfully submitted,\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut WILLIAM K. HARRINGTON UNITED STATES TRUSTEE FOR REGION 2\n\n> By: /s/ Steven E. Mackey Steven E. Mackey\n\n> > /s/ Holley L. Claiborn Holley L. Claiborn\n\n Trial Attorneys Office of the United States Trustee Giaimo Federal Building, Room 302 150 Court Street New Haven, CT 06510 [Steven.E.Mackey@usdoj.gov](mailto:Steven.E.Mackey@usdoj.gov) Federal Bar No: ct09932(Connecticut) Holley.L.Claiborn@usdoj.gov Federal Bar No.: ct17216 (Connecticut) (203) 773-2210\n\n## **CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**\n\n The undersigned certifies that the foregoing objection was served on all appearing parties via the Court's electronic case filing system noted below:\n\nWilliam Baldiga on behalf of Debtor Ho Wan Kwok [wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com](mailto:wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com)\n\nWilliam R. Baldiga on behalf of Debtor Ho Wan Kwok [wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com](mailto:wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com)\n\nPatrick M. Birney on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. pbirney@rc.com, [ctrivigno@rc.com](mailto:ctrivigno@rc.com)\n\nCarollynn H.G. Callari on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Rui Ma [ccallari@callaripartners.com](mailto:ccallari@callaripartners.com)\n\nCarollynn H.G. Callari on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Weican Meng [ccallari@callaripartners.com](mailto:ccallari@callaripartners.com)\n\nCarollynn H.G. Callari on behalf of Creditor Zheng Wu [ccallari@callaripartners.com](mailto:ccallari@callaripartners.com)\n\nDavid S. Forsh on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Rui Ma [dforsh@callaripartners.com](mailto:dforsh@callaripartners.com)\n\nDavid S. Forsh on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Weican Meng [dforsh@callaripartners.com](mailto:dforsh@callaripartners.com)\n\nDavid S. Forsh on behalf of Creditor Zheng Wu [dforsh@callaripartners.com](mailto:dforsh@callaripartners.com)\n\nPeter Friedman on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [pfriedman@omm.com](mailto:pfriedman@omm.com)\n\nIrve J. Goldman on behalf of Creditor Committee Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors igoldman@pullcom.com, [rmccoy@pullcom.com](mailto:rmccoy@pullcom.com)\n\nDavid V. Harbach, II on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [dharbach@omm.com](mailto:dharbach@omm.com)\n\nJonathan Kaplan on behalf of Creditor Committee Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors jkaplan@pullcom.com[, prulewicz@pullcom.com;rmccoy@pullcom.com](mailto:prulewicz@pullcom.com;rmccoy@pullcom.com)\n\nDylan Kletter on behalf of Debtor Ho Wan Kwok dkletter@brownrudnick.com, adeering@brownrudnick.com;upinelo@brownrudnick.com;bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com;rstark@brow nrudnick.com\n\nKristin B. Mayhew on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Rui Ma kmayhew@mdmc-law.com, [kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com](mailto:kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com)\n\nKristin B. Mayhew on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Weican Meng kmayhew@mdmc-law.com, [kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com](mailto:kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com)\n\nKristin B. Mayhew on behalf of Creditor Zheng Wu kmayhew@mdmc-law.com, [kwarshauer@mdmc](mailto:kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com)[law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com](mailto:kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com)\n\nTimothy D. Miltenberger on behalf of Interested Party Golden Spring (New York) LTD Tmiltenberger@cbshealaw.com, [msullivan@cbshealaw.com;dtempera@cbshealaw.com](mailto:msullivan@cbshealaw.com;dtempera@cbshealaw.com)\n\nScott D. Rosen on behalf of Interested Party Golden Spring (New York) LTD srosen@cb-shea.com, [kseaman@cbshealaw.com](mailto:kseaman@cbshealaw.com)\n\nStuart M. Sarnoff on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [ssarnoff@omm.com](mailto:ssarnoff@omm.com)\n\nBennett Silverberg on behalf of Debtor Ho Wan Kwok [bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com](mailto:bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com)\n\nAnnecca H. Smith on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [asmith@rc.com](mailto:asmith@rc.com)\n\nJay Marshall Wolman on behalf of Creditor Logan Cheng jmw@randazza.com, [ecf-](mailto:ecf-6898@ecf.pacerpro.com)[6898@ecf.pacerpro.com](mailto:ecf-6898@ecf.pacerpro.com)\n\nPeter J. Zarella on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Rui Ma [pzarella@mdmc-law.com](mailto:pzarella@mdmc-law.com)\n\nPeter J. Zarella on behalf of 20 Largest Creditor Weican Meng [pzarella@mdmc-law.com](mailto:pzarella@mdmc-law.com)\n\nPeter J. Zarella on behalf of Creditor Zheng Wu [pzarella@mdmc-law.com](mailto:pzarella@mdmc-law.com)\n\nApril 6, 2022 New Haven, CT\n\n By: /s/ Steven E. Mackey Steven E. Mackey","body_zh":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n关于：第 11 章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），又名 WENGUI GUO（郭文贵），又名 MILES GUO（迈尔斯·郭），案件编号：22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。涉及：ECF 87 & 143\n\nUNITED STATES TRUSTEE（联邦破产受托人）就债务人申请授权聘请及留用 STRETTO 作为债权申报及送达通知代理人提出的异议陈述\n\nWilliam K. Harrington（威廉·K·哈灵顿），Region 2（第2区）联邦破产受托人（以下简称“联邦破产受托人”），依据 28 U.S.C. § 586(a)(3) 中规定的职责与职权，谨此就债务人关于授权聘请及留用 Stretto 作为债权申报及送达通知代理人的申请（以下简称“《申请》”）（ECF 87 及 143）提交本异议陈述。为支持其异议陈述，联邦破产受托人通过其下述署名律师，谨陈述并说明如下：\n\n事实\n\n1. 债务人，亦被称为郭文贵、Miles Guo、Miles Kwok 以及其他诸多别名，于 2022 年 2 月 15 日自愿提交了第 11 章破产申请（以下简称“《破产申请》”）。ECF 1。\n\n2. 债务人目前根据《破产法典》（Bankruptcy Code）第 1107 条和第 1108 条的规定管理其财务事务及其商业利益。\n\n3. 2022 年 3 月 21 日，联邦破产受托人在本案中指定了 Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors（无担保债权人官方委员会）（以下简称“委员会”）。ECF 108。迄今为止，该委员会尚未提交聘请律师的申请。\n\n4. 截至目前，各类债权人总计似乎不足六十（60）名。参见当前债权人名册/邮寄信息。此外，除联邦破产受托人外，接收案卷材料的 ECF 电子通知/送达及文件副本的律师似乎共有十五（15）名。同上。\n\n5. 2022 年 3 月 16 日，债务人提交了《申请》，请求根据 28 U.S.C § 156(c) 聘请 Stretto, Inc.（Stretto 公司）（以下简称“Stretto”）提供广泛的服务，包括送达通知及债权申报处理。ECF 87。该《申请》随后补充了一份“增强版”的 Stretto 服务协议，其中包含服务“价目表”。ECF 143。\n\n6. 该《申请》还附有 Sheryl Betance（雪莉·贝坦斯）的声明（以下简称“《贝坦斯声明》”）作为支持。ECF 87，第 33 – 40 页。\n\n7. 鉴于债务人的债权人数量非常有限，该《申请》未能充分证明 Stretto 拟提供的服务在目前或未来的必要性。\n\n8. 无论是在《申请》本身还是在《贝坦斯声明》中，均未解释为何在债务人的第 11 章破产案中需要设立“送达通知”和/或“债权申报”代理人。ECF 87。《申请》使用了诸如“大量的邮寄工作”等“套话”，并引用了一长串判例以支持需要“送达通知及债权申报代理人”，而那些第 11 章案件往往拥有数百名甚至数千名债权人及其他通知接收方。ECF 87，第 9 段。尽管该《申请》依赖于具有数百乃至数千名债权人的第 11 章案件，但对于在本案中——债务人仅拥有极易管理的不足五打（60名）债权人，且仅有区区十五（15）方接收电子通知的情况下——为何需要设立此类“代理人”，该《申请》却保持沉默。\n\n送达通知\n\n9. 通过填写信封地址、复印文件、装信封、贴附适当邮资并邮寄这些信封向债权人送达通知的行为，属于一项文员性质的工作，哪怕是能力最普通的债务人律师事务所也能轻易完成。像 Brown Rudnick（布朗·鲁德尼克律师事务所）这样的律师事务所，在没有外部代理人协助的情况下提供此类服务理应毫无困难。在 Connecticut 区（康涅狄格区），第 7 章受托人及债务人律师在所有破产类型章节中为六十（60）名或更少债权人送达通知均属于常规操作，无需“送达通知”和/或“债权申报”代理人。无论是《申请》还是《贝坦斯声明》，都未能充分支持“留用”及聘请 Stretto 作为送达通知代理人的必要性。\n\n债权申报\n\n10. 不可否认，处理数百乃至数千起债权申报的负担可能会耗尽破产法院书记官通常有限的资源。在某些特定情况下，通过使用“送达通知及债权申报代理人”将管理送达通知、表决票收集/分析以及债权申报处理的费用和后勤负担从破产法院书记官转移给债务人是适当的。然而，债务人的案件并不属于这种情况，因为本案中债权人不足六十（60）名，且目前 ECF 电子通知仅发送给十五（15）名律师。破产法院书记官办公室常规处理债权人群体规模类似、甚至大得多的第 11 章案件的送达通知及债权申报处理工作。无论是《申请》还是《贝坦斯声明》，均未支持“留用”及聘请 Stretto 作为债权申报处理代理人的必要性。\n\n其他问题\n\n11. 如果法院认定聘请 Stretto 是适当的，则有几个问题应当予以解决：\n\n(a) Stretto 服务协议第 3 段规定，若本案转换为第 7 章清算程序，Stretto 将继续提供服务。Stretto 服务的费用不属于第 7 章破产财团应当承担的费用。一旦转换为第 7 章，Stretto 的服务应自动终止。ECF 143，第 3 段。\n\n(b) Stretto 服务协议第 10 段规定，债务人将“向 Stretto 及其成员、董事、管理人员、雇员、代表、关联方、顾问、分包商和代理人（统称‘受赔偿方’）提供赔偿并使其免受损害”。Stretto 对该条款未提供任何对价，并且对于提议提供《申请》中所述服务的当事方而言，在服务协议中包含此类条款是不当的。ECF 143，第 9 段。\n\n(c) Stretto 服务协议第 10 段规定了责任限制，将 Stretto 的责任限制在其因导致损失的服务而收取的金钱数额之内。Stretto 对该责任限制条款未提供任何对价。该条款是不当的，应当予以删除。ECF 143，第 10 段。\n\n结论\n\n由于债务人的债权人群体规模非常小，聘请 Stretto 似乎完全是为了债务人及其律师的便利，而债务人律师本应承担为债务人提供极其常规体量的送达通知服务的责任。破产法院书记官办公室执行其日常的债权收集和处理职能似乎也不会受到任何不便。显而易见的是，债务人律师试图将可能无法获得报销的文员服务费用转嫁给 Stretto，以产生持续且不断滚动的行政管理费用债权，从而使其服务获得优先受偿权，并取代现有优先债权人及一般无担保债权人的申请前债权。《申请》未能承担起证明聘请 Stretto 所产生的拟议行政管理费用确有必要的举证责任，至少在目前以及在债务人案件的现阶段是如此。此外，债务人需要在针对《申请》举行听证会之前或听证会上解决上述第 11 段中提出的问题。\n\n据此，基于上述所有理由，联邦破产受托人谨请求法院在不损害其再次申请权益的情况下驳回《申请》；或者，作为替代方案，推迟作出裁定，直至《申请》得到补充和/或修改以提供必要的支持从而充分解决本文所提出的问题为止。\n\n日期：2022 年 4 月 6 日 谨此提交，\n\nConnecticut 州 New Haven（康涅狄格州纽黑文） WILLIAM K. HARRINGTON 第 2 区联邦破产受托人\n\n代表签署：/s/ Steven E. Mackey Steven E. Mackey（史蒂文·E·麦基）\n\n/s/ Holley L. Claiborn Holley L. Claiborn（霍利·L·克莱伯恩）\n\n出庭律师 联邦破产受托人办公室 Giaimo Federal Building（贾伊莫联邦大厦）, Room 302 150 Court Street New Haven, CT 06510 [Steven.E.Mackey@usdoj.gov] 联邦律师执照号：ct09932 (Connecticut) Holley.L.Claiborn@usdoj.gov 联邦律师执照号：ct17216 (Connecticut) (203) 773-2210\n\n送达证书\n\n下述署名人证明：上述异议已通过法院下述电子案件归档系统送达给所有出庭当事方：\n\nWilliam Baldiga 代表债务人 Ho Wan Kwok [wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com]\n\nWilliam R. Baldiga 代表债务人 Ho Wan Kwok [wbaldiga@brownrudnick.com]\n\nPatrick M. Birney 代表前 20 大债权人 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.（太盟亚洲机会基金有限公司） pbirney@rc.com, [ctrivigno@rc.com]\n\nCarollynn H.G. Callari 代表前 20 大债权人 Rui Ma（马蕊） [ccallari@callaripartners.com]\n\nCarollynn H.G. Callari 代表前 20 大债权人 Weican Meng（孟维参） [ccallari@callaripartners.com]\n\nCarollynn H.G. Callari 代表债权人 Zheng Wu（吴征） [ccallari@callaripartners.com]\n\nDavid S. Forsh 代表前 20 大债权人 Rui Ma [dforsh@callaripartners.com]\n\nDavid S. Forsh 代表前 20 大债权人 Weican Meng [dforsh@callaripartners.com]\n\nDavid S. Forsh 代表债权人 Zheng Wu [dforsh@callaripartners.com]\n\nPeter Friedman 代表前 20 大债权人 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [pfriedman@omm.com]\n\nIrve J. Goldman 代表债权人委员会 Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors igoldman@pullcom.com, [rmccoy@pullcom.com]\n\nDavid V. Harbach, II 代表前 20 大债权人 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [dharbach@omm.com]\n\nJonathan Kaplan 代表债权人委员会 Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors jkaplan@pullcom.com[, prulewicz@pullcom.com;rmccoy@pullcom.com]\n\nDylan Kletter 代表债务人 Ho Wan Kwok dkletter@brownrudnick.com, adeering@brownrudnick.com;upinelo@brownrudnick.com;bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com;rstark@brownrudnick.com\n\nKristin B. Mayhew 代表前 20 大债权人 Rui Ma kmayhew@mdmc-law.com, [kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com]\n\nKristin B. Mayhew 代表前 20 大债权人 Weican Meng kmayhew@mdmc-law.com, [kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com]\n\nKristin B. Mayhew 代表债权人 Zheng Wu kmayhew@mdmc-law.com, [kwarshauer@mdmc-law.com;bdangelo@mdmc-law.com]\n\nTimothy D. Miltenberger 代表利害关系方 Golden Spring (New York) LTD（金泉（纽约）有限公司） Tmiltenberger@cbshealaw.com, [msullivan@cbshealaw.com;dtempera@cbshealaw.com]\n\nScott D. Rosen 代表利害关系方 Golden Spring (New York) LTD srosen@cb-shea.com, [kseaman@cbshealaw.com]\n\nStuart M. Sarnoff 代表前 20 大债权人 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [ssarnoff@omm.com]\n\nBennett Silverberg 代表债务人 Ho Wan Kwok [bsilverberg@brownrudnick.com]\n\nAnnecca H. Smith 代表前 20 大债权人 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [asmith@rc.com]\n\nJay Marshall Wolman 代表债权人 Logan Cheng（程洛根） jmw@randazza.com, [ecf-6898@ecf.pacerpro.com]\n\nPeter J. Zarella 代表前 20 大债权人 Rui Ma [pzarella@mdmc-law.com]\n\nPeter J. Zarella 代表前 20 大债权人 Weican Meng [pzarella@mdmc-law.com]\n\nPeter J. Zarella 代表债权人 Zheng Wu [pzarella@mdmc-law.com]\n\n2022 年 4 月 6 日 Connecticut 州 New Haven\n\n代表签署：/s/ Steven E. Mackey Steven E. Mackey","key_entities":["Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Je","Miles Guo"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":1,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":87,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":108,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":143,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":1642,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 13:02:55"}