{"id":"court_ctb_250_14","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":250,"sub_number":14,"doc_type":"EXHIBIT","filed_date":"2022-04-22","title":"EXHIBIT PAX 14 Transcript of the April 8, 2022 Deposition of Craig Jalbert","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"# **EXHIBIT PAX 14**\n\nTranscript of the April 8, 2022 Deposition of Craig Jalbert\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 250-14 Filed 04/22/22 Entered 04/22/22 16:59:37 Page 2 of 85\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION **------------------------------------------x**  IN RE: Chapter 11 HO WAN KWOK, Case No. 22-50073(JAM) Debtor. **------------------------------------------x**  DATE: April 8, 2022 TIME : 1 0 : 1 7 A. M . VIDEO-RECORDED DEPOSITION OF CRAIG JALBERT of VERDOLINO & LOWEY, P.C., in the above entitled matter, at the above date and time, held at the offices of O'Melveny & Myers LLP, 7 Times Square, New York, New York 10036, by Lenaya Lynch, a Notary Public and Shorthand Reporter of the State of New York. Page 1\n\n| I              | 2 APPEARANCES:                                                              | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                 |\n|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------------------|\n|                | 3 O'MEL VENY & MYERS LLP                                                    | 2  | York. My name is Jonathan Difilippo                        |\n|                | Attorneys for PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA<br>4 OPPORTIJNITY FUND LLP              | 3  | from the firm Veritext and I am the                        |\n|                | 7 Times Square, 30th Floor                                                  | 4  | videographer. The Court Reporter is                        |\n|                | 5 New York, New York 10036<br>BY LAURA ARONSSON, ESQ.                       | 5  | Lenaya Lynch from the firm, Veritext.                      |\n| 6              | DA YID HARBACH, ESQ.                                                        | 6  | I'm not authorized to administer an                        |\n| 7              | MaKENZIE B RUSSO, ESQ                                                       | 7  | oath. I'm not related to any party                         |\n| 8              | BROWN RUDNICK LLP                                                           | 8  | in this action nor am I financially                        |\n|                | 9 Attorneys for HO WAN KWOK                                                 | 9  | interested in the outcome.                                 |\n|                | 7 Times Square<br>10 New York, New York 10036                               | 10 | Counsel and all present in the                             |\n|                | BY KENNETH J AULET, ESQ                                                     | 11 | room and everyone attending remotely                       |\n| 11<br>12       |                                                                             | 12 | will now state their appearances and                       |\n|                | PULLMAN & COMLEY LLC<br>13 Attorneys for CREDITOR'S COMMITTEE               | 13 | affiliations for the record. If                            |\n|                | 850 Mam Street                                                              | 14 | there are any objections to the                            |\n|                | 14 PO Box 7006<br>Bridgeport, Connecticut 06601                             | 15 | proceeding, please state them at the                       |\n|                | 15 BY:IRVEJGOLDMAN,ESQ.                                                     | 16 | time of your appearance beginning                          |\n| 16             | 17 COHN, BIRNBAUM, SHEA P C                                                 | 17 | with the noticing attorney.                                |\n|                | Attorney for GOLDEN SPRING                                                  | 18 | MS. ARONSSON: LauraAronsson,                               |\n| 18             | 100 Pearl Street, Smte 12<br>New Haven, Connecticut 06103                   | 19 | O'Melveny and Myers for Pacific                            |\n|                | 19 BY TIMOTHY MILTENBERGER, ESQ. via<br>Teleconference                      | 20 | Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund LP.                         |\n| 20             |                                                                             | 21 | MR. HARBACH: David Harbach                                 |\n| 21             | ALSO PRESENT                                                                | 22 | with O'Melveny and Myers for the same                      |\n| 22             |                                                                             | 23 | client.                                                    |\n| 23             | JON DIFILIPPO, Legal Videographer                                           | 24 | MS. RUSSO: Makenzie Russo with                             |\n| 24<br>25       | *<br>*<br>*                                                                 | 25 | O'Melveny and Myers for the same                           |\n|                | Page 2                                                                      |    | Page 4                                                     |\n|                |                                                                             |    |                                                            |\n|                |                                                                             |    |                                                            |\n| 1              | C. JALBERT                                                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                 |\n| 2              | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good                                                      | 2  | client.                                                    |\n| 3              | morning. We are going on the record                                         | 3  | MR. AULET: Kenneth Aulet of                                |\n| 4              | at 10: 17 a.m. on April 22nd --<br>I'm                                      | 4  | Brown Rudnick, proposed counsel for                        |\n| 5              | sorry, April 8th, 2022. Please note                                         | 5  | the debtor, Ho Wan Kwok.                                   |\n| 6              | that the microphones are sensitive                                          | 6  | MR. GOLDMAN: Irve Goldman,                                 |\n| 7              | and may pick up whispering, private                                         | 7  | Pullman and Comley, proposed counsel                       |\n| 8              | conversations and cellular                                                  | 8  | for the Creditor's Committee.                              |\n| 9              | interference. Please tum off all                                            | 9  | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the                                 |\n| 10             | cell phones or place them away from                                         | 10 | Court Reporter please swear in the                         |\n| 11             | the microphone as they can interfere                                        | 11 | Witness?                                                   |\n| 12             | with the deposition audio. Audio and                                        | 12 | MR. AULET: There's one person                              |\n| 13             | video recording will continue to take                                       | 13 | on the line.                                               |\n| 14             | place unless all parties agree to go                                        | 14 | MR. MILTENBERGER: Are we done                              |\n| 15             | off the record.                                                             | 15 | with the people in person? Timothy                         |\n| 16             | This is Media Unit 1 of the                                                 | 16 | Miltenberger for Golden Spring, NY                         |\n| 17             | video-recorded deposition of Craig                                          | 17 | Limited.                                                   |\n| 18             | Jalbert in the matter ofre: Ho Wan                                          | 18 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the                                 |\n| 19             | Kwok filed in the United States                                             | 19 | Court Reporter please swear in the                         |\n|                | Bankruptcy Court, District of                                               | 20 | Witness?                                                   |\n|                | Connecticut, Bridgeport Division,                                           |    | 21 C RA I G<br>J A L B E RT, called as a                   |\n| 20<br>21<br>22 | Case Number 22-50073.                                                       |    | 22 witness, having been first duly sworn by a              |\n| 23             | This deposition is being held                                               |    | 23 Notary Public of the State of New York, was             |\n| 24<br>25       | at O'Melveny and Myers LLP, located<br>at Times Square Tower, New York, New |    | 24 examined and testified as follows:<br>25 EXAMINATION BY |\n\n2 (Pages 2 - 5)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 MS. ARONSSON: 3 Q. Please state your name for the 4 record. 5 A. Craig Jalbert, J-A-L-B-E-R-T. 6 Q. What is your address? 7 A. Home address? The business 8 address is 124 Washington Street, Suite 9 101, Foxboro, Massachusetts 02035. 10 Q. Good morning. We previously 11 met off the record. On the record, my name 12 is Laura Aronsson and I'm an attorney at 13 O'Melveny and Myers for Pacific Alliance 14 Asia Opportunity Fund. Mr. Jalbert, have 15 you ever testified in court before? 16 A. Yes. 1 7 Q. In what case -- or I'll start 18 how many times? 19 A. 50, 60, 70 something. 20 **MR GOLDMAN:** Before we get too 21 far into things, can I just ask -- 22 this is a notice of deposition 23 relating to what contested matter? 24 There are a number of motions before 25 the Court. The notice of deposition 1 C. JALBERT 2 doesn't indicate which of the matters 3 it relates to. 4 MS. ARONSSON: Sure. So we 5 have -- we served a 30(b )6 notice of 6 deposition which I'll mark as an 7 exhibit so that we're all on the same 8 page but it relates to the retention 9 ofVerdolino and Lowey. 10 MR GOLDMAN: All right. I 11 just wasn't sure because it's not 12 identified on the notice. 13 MS. ARONSSON: Thank you. 14 Q. Sorry. You said 50 or 60 15 times? 16 A. 70, 80, I don't know. I have 1 7 not kept -- I've got a list of ten years Page 6 18 that goes back 40 or 50 and I've been doing 19 it for 30. So no idea. 20 **Q.** Well, we can talk about some of 21 the broad categories of experience you have 22 later but let's start just to go over a few 23 procedures that I'm sure you're familiar 24 with. Do you understand that you're 25 testifying under oath today? 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. Yes. 3 **Q.** Do you understand that means 4 that you're swearing that all of your 5 answers are truthful? 6 A. Yes. 7 **Q.** And that you are subject to the 8 penalty of perjury? 9 A. Yes. 10 **Q.** The Videographer is recording 11 everything on camera and the Court Reporter 12 is preparing a written record of what we 13 discuss here today and will later produce a 14 copy of that transcript. Do you 15 understand? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. Unlike normal conversation, it 18 is important that we not talk over one 19 another. Please wait for me to finish my 20 question before you answer. I'll try to do 21 the same for you. Do you understand? 22 A. Yes. 23 **Q.** Your answers need to be 24 audible. A shake of the head is 25 insufficient as are statements like uh-huh. 1 C. JALBERT 2 Do you understand? 3 A. Understood. 4 Q. If you do not understand my 5 question, please ask me to repeat. 6 Otherwise, I'll assume that you do 7 understand the question. Is that okay? 8 A. Yes. <sup>9</sup>**Q.** If you need a break, just let Page 8 10 me know and we can take one but if there's 11 a question pending, please answer it before 12 we break. Are you represented by Counsel 13 today? 14 A. I think so. 15 Q. Who do you understand to be 16 representing you? 17 A. Ken Aulet. 18 Q. If your attorney objects to a 19 question, you should still answer it unless 20 you don't understand the question or 21 Counsel instructs you not to answer. Do 22 you understand? 23 A. Yes. 24 **Q.** Are you suffering from any 25 condition that would impair your ability to\n\n3 (Pages 6 - 9)\n\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                              |    | C. JALBERT                                                               |\n|-----|---------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n|     | 2 testify accurately or truthfully?                     |    | 2 been designated to testify about each topic                            |\n| 3   | A.<br>No.                                               |    | 3 listed here?                                                           |\n| 4   | Are you taking any medications<br>Q.                    | 4  | MR AULET: Objection.                                                     |\n|     | 5 that might interfere with your ability to             | 5  | A.<br>Yes.                                                               |\n|     | 6 give accurate or truthful testimony?                  | 6  | MR AULET: He's been                                                      |\n| 7   | A.<br>No.                                               | 7  | designated as per our responses and                                      |\n| 8   | Is there any reason why you<br>Q.                       | 8  | objections.                                                              |\n|     | 9 cannot testify truthfully and accurately              | 9  | MS. ARONSSON: Thank you.                                                 |\n|     | 10 today?                                               | 10 | Q.<br>Are you familiar with these                                        |\n| 11  | A.<br>No.                                               |    | 11 subject areas?                                                        |\n| 12  | MS. ARONSSON: Tab one. The                              | 12 | A.<br>Yes.                                                               |\n| 13  | Court Reporter is going to be marking                   | 13 | Do you understand that you are<br>Q.                                     |\n| 14  | what will be Jalbert Exhibit 1.                         |    | 14 required to testify as to Verdolino and                               |\n| 15  | (Whereupon, Notice of                                   |    | 15 Lowey's knowledge about these topics, not                             |\n| 16  | Deposition was marked as Jalbert                        |    | 16 just your own?                                                        |\n| 1 7 | Exhibit 1 for identification as of                      | 17 | A.<br>Yes.                                                               |\n| 18  | this date by the Reporter.)                             | 18 | Q.<br>Do you understand that you were                                    |\n| 19  | All right, Mr. Jalbert. Do you<br>Q.                    |    | 19 required to obtain all of the knowledge and                           |\n|     | 20 recognize this document?                             |    | 20 information necessary to allow you to fully                           |\n| 21  | A.<br>I do.                                             |    | 21 and honestly testify concerning each of                               |\n| 22  | Q.<br>What is it?                                       |    | 22 these topics upon Verdolino and Lowey's                               |\n| 23  | A.<br>Pacific Alliance Asia                             |    | 23 behalf)                                                               |\n|     | 24 Opportunity Fund LLP's Notice of Deposition          | 24 | MR AULET: Same objection as                                              |\n|     | 25 ofVerdolino and Lowey PC pursuant to Rule<br>Page 10 | 25 | before.<br>Page 12                                                       |\n|     |                                                         |    |                                                                          |\n|     |                                                         |    |                                                                          |\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                              | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                               |\n|     | 2 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil                | 2  | A.<br>I did the best I could.                                            |\n|     | 3 Procedure.                                            | 3  | What, if anything, did you do<br>Q.                                      |\n| 4   | Is it your understanding that<br>Q.                     |    | 4 to prepare for this deposition?                                        |\n|     | 5 you are testifying today in connection with           | 5  | A.<br>I spoke with attorney Ben                                          |\n|     | 6 in re: Ho Wan Kwok?                                   |    | 6 Silverberg, with Counsel, Ken Aulet, I                                 |\n| 7   | A.<br>Yes.                                              |    | 7 spoke with my colleagues, Matthew Flynn and                            |\n| 8   | Can you please tum to Page 6<br>Q.                      |    | 8 Mary Jo Schindler. I reviewed a                                        |\n|     | 9 --                                                    |    | 9 significant amount of documents, some filed                            |\n| 10  | A.<br>Excuse me, I just forgot to get                   |    | 10 with the Court, some prepared internally.                             |\n|     | 11 my glasses.                                          |    | 11 Reviewed e-mails. Covered as much as I                                |\n| 12  | MS. ARONSSON: Can we go off                             |    | 12 could.                                                                |\n| 13  | the record for one minute?                              | 13 | Did you collect the documents<br>Q.                                      |\n| 14  | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                           |    | 14 that you prepared or were they provided to                            |\n| 15  | 10:24 a.m. and we are off the record.                   |    | 15 you by Counsel?                                                       |\n| 16  | (Whereupon, an off-the-record                           | 16 | A.<br>The documents that --<br>are you                                   |\n| 17  | discussion was held.)                                   |    | 1 7 asking for the documents that we sent to                             |\n| 18  | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                           |    | 18 O'Melveny?                                                            |\n| 19  | 10:24 a.m. and we're back on the                        | 19 | I'm asking --<br>taking a step<br>Q.                                     |\n| 20  | record. You may proceed.                                |    | 20 back, just asking about your preparation                              |\n| 21  | Can you tum to Page 6 to the<br>Q.                      |    | 21 for today's deposition.                                               |\n|     | 22 heading Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics?             | 22 | A.<br>I just looked at my own                                            |\n| 24  | 23 You see that?<br>A.<br>Yes.                          |    | 23 documents and my own e-mails on the<br>24 Verdolino and Lowey server. |\n| 25  | Do you understand that you have<br>Q.                   | 25 | Q.<br>Generally, what were the                                           |\n\n4 (Pages 10 - 13)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                           | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                               |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 subject matters of those e-mails?                                  | 2  | Anyone else besides the people<br>Q.                                                     |\n| 3  | all of<br>A.<br>It was looking at the --                             |    | 3 that we've talked about?                                                               |\n|    | not all of them. Many ofmy e-mails,<br>4 --                          | 4  | A.<br>Regarding the --<br>just regarding                                                 |\n|    | the statement of financial<br>5 the SOF A's --                       |    | 5 the deposition?                                                                        |\n|    | 6 affairs --<br>the schedules, the global notes,                     | 6  | Yes.<br>Q.                                                                               |\n|    | 7 the global notes and specific notes, most                          | 7  | A.<br>No.                                                                                |\n|    | 8 of the pleadings to employ professionals,                          | 8  | You haven't spoke to the<br>Q.                                                           |\n|    | 9 particularly ours, the motion for the DIP                          |    | 9 debtor?                                                                                |\n|    | 10 financing, many of the objections, not all                        | 10 | A.<br>About the deposition?                                                              |\n|    | 11 of them. I'm trying to think if there's                           | 11 | Q.<br>About the deposition.                                                              |\n|    | 12 anything else. I can't think of anything                          | 12 | A.<br>No.                                                                                |\n|    | 13 off the top beyond that --                                        | 13 | Have you ever met the debtor?<br>Q.                                                      |\n| 14 | Q.<br>Thank you. That's helpful. So                                  | 14 | A.<br>Yes.                                                                               |\n|    | 15 you mentioned that you spoke to your                              | 15 | Q.<br>When did you meet the debtor?                                                      |\n|    | 16 attorneys, Ben and Ken?                                           | 16 | The continued meeting of342 --<br>A.                                                     |\n| 17 | A.<br>Yes.                                                           |    | 17 or 341 meeting which was I think Wednesday,                                           |\n| 18 | When did you speak to them?<br>Q.                                    |    | 18 the first time I met him.                                                             |\n| 19 | A.<br>Well, we were delayed a little                                 | 19 | Is that the only time you met<br>Q.                                                      |\n|    | 20 bit so I had a few minutes this morning                           |    | 20 the debtor?                                                                           |\n|    | 21 with Ken. I spoke with Ben briefly last                           | 21 | A.<br>Yes.                                                                               |\n|    | 22 night. Again, this morning on --<br>unrelated                     | 22 | Outside ofthe 341 proceeding,<br>Q.                                                      |\n|    | 23 to the deposition and I had previously                            |    | 23 did you interact with the debtor?                                                     |\n|    | 24 spoken to Ken probably one or two times                           | 24 | A.<br>No.                                                                                |\n|    | 25 over the last few days, give or take.                             | 25 | I just want to cover a little<br>Q.                                                      |\n|    | Page 14                                                              |    | Page 16                                                                                  |\n|    |                                                                      |    |                                                                                          |\n|    |                                                                      |    |                                                                                          |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                           |    | C. JALBERT                                                                               |\n| 2  | Were each of these interactions<br>Q.                                |    | 2 bit of your background. Can you talk about                                             |\n|    | 3 over the phone?                                                    |    | 3 your educational history since high school?                                            |\n| 4  | A.<br>Until today, yes.                                              | 4  | A.<br>I graduated from Western                                                           |\n| 5  | About how long did you spend<br>Q.                                   |    | 5 Connecticut High School in 1979. I went to                                             |\n|    | 6 preparing with your attorneys in connection                        |    | 6 Boston College. Graduated Boston College                                               |\n|    | 7 with your preparation for this deposition?                         |    | 7 with a bachelor of science and degree in                                               |\n| 8  | A.<br>I would have to hazard a guess.                                |    | 8 accountancy in 1983. I went to work for                                                |\n|    | 9 I don't have my time records in front of                           |    | 9 Arthur Andersen from June of'83 till                                                   |\n|    | 10 me.                                                               |    | 10 August 31 of'87. On September 1 of 1987,                                              |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Like two hours, ten hours?                                     |    | 11 I started at the precursor of what is now                                             |\n| 12 | A.<br>My guess is in the two to four                                 |    | 12 Verdolino and Lowey and I've been there in                                            |\n|    | 13 hour range. No more than that.                                    |    | 13 the 35 years since and during that time, I                                            |\n| 14 | Q.<br>Did you speak to anyone else                                   |    | 14 I've gone to many, many, many professional                                            |\n|    | 15 other than the folks that you mentioned at                        |    | 15 CPE type courses of all sorts of flavors.                                             |\n|    | 16 Verdolino and Lowey and your attorneys                            | 16 | Q.<br>What do you mean by CPE?                                                           |\n|    | 17 regarding this deposition?                                        | 17 | A.<br>A continuing professional                                                          |\n| 18 | A.<br>Our IT person, Tim McDonald who                                |    | 18 education.                                                                            |\n|    | 19 assisted in the search --<br>the electronic                       | 19 | Q.<br>Is that a required procedure                                                       |\n|    | 20 search of e-mails and records and worked                          |    | 20 for any type of certification that you                                                |\n|    | 21 with the Brown Rudnick IT person to send                          |    | 21 have?                                                                                 |\n|    | 22 everything over. Aside from having him try                        | 22 | some of it is required<br>A.<br>It's --                                                  |\n|    | 23 and get the records, we didn't have any                           |    | 23 for my certification as a certified                                                   |\n|    | 24 discussion of the case facts and<br>25 circumstances or anything. |    | 24 insolvency restructuring advisor. The rest<br>25 are just to maintain my professional |\n\n5 (Pages 14 - 17)\n\nPAX-014-005\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 capabilities and stay on top of various 3 issues as the years have gone on. 4 Q. So you mentioned certified 5 insolvency instructor? 6 A. Certified insolvency 7 restructuring advisor. CIRA. 8 Q. So this is a professional 9 certification? 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. Do you hold any other 12 professional certifications besides the 13 CIA? 14 A. CIRA, no. 15 Q. CIRA. I think you said you had 16 a accountant degree from Boston College? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. Do you hold any other graduate 19 or any graduate degrees? 20 A. No. 21 Q. Are you currently employed at 22 V erdolino and Lowey? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. Generally, what services does 25 Verdolino and Lowey offer its clients? 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. There were three or four -- I 3 guess four major buckets. The first and 4 biggest is the insolvency arena, Page 18 5 underperforming businesses and individuals. 6 That includes litigation support and 7 everything related to it. We have a 8 full-time 13 or 14 people I think it is 9 that work in taxation and we also do what 10 I'll call high net worth babysitting. We 11 have -- and I don't do any of this work. 12 My partner and others do it but we have 13 very wealthy clients that don't pay their 14 own bills, that have multiple residences. 15 Everything comes to us. We act as a family 16 office for a whole -- for a number of 1 7 people and the last thing we do is federal 18 election reporting for federal congress 19 people and senators and presidential. 20 Q. Thank you. 21 A. Did I say we have tax 22 department -- yes, tax department. That's 23 the four. 24 Q. You mentioned the high net 25 worth baby sitting. Who, at Verdolino, is Page 19 1 C. JALBERT 2 responsible for this? 3 A. Well, my partner and various 4 staff 5 **Q.** What's his name? 6 A. Keith Lowey. 7 **Q.** Is that department involved in 8 this matter before us? 9 A. No. 10 **Q.** Is Verdolino and Lowey always 11 engaged by the debtor in the bankruptcy 12 context? 13 A. No. 14 Q. What other scenarios is 15 Verdolino and Lowey engaged under? 16 A. We've been engaged by trustees, 17 post confirmation fiduciaries, whatever 18 they may be called; you said debtors, 19 creditors' committee, creditors, secured 20 lenders. I think we've probably 21 represented, over the years, most every 22 kind of party and interest to a bankruptcy 23 that there is. 24 **Q.** Turning to your experience 25 specifically, what experience do you have 1 C. JALBERT 2 in Chapter 11 cases? 3 A. I've been in over 500 Chapter Page 20 4 11 cases. We've been committee financial 5 advisor, committee accountants, debtor 6 financial advisor, debtor accountants, 7 accountants on behalf of secured lenders, 8 accountants on behalf of individual 9 creditors. Trying to think -- I mean 10 again, we've done -- we've represented 11 pretty much every constituency so over 12 time, I've done -- I've represented every 13 reasonable constituency in a bankruptcy I 14 can remember. 15 Q. What is your title at Verdolino 16 and Lowey? 17 A. Principal. 18 Q. We talked about the four 19 buckets. Generally, what are your 20 responsibilities with respect to Verdolino 21 and Lowey services? 22 A. Just for the most part, the 23 first -- all of my time not spent running 24 my own firm is in the bankruptcy insolvency 25 and the like that spreads over a little bit Page 21\n\n85\n\n6 (Pages 18 - 21)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 to taxation. I don't run the department or 3 anything but I certainly interact and then 4 litigation support and the like, you know, 5 the types of things you would do in the 6 context of a bankruptcy. 7 **Q.** What is meant by litigation 8 support, generally? 9 A. Well, it can be pretty broad 10 but for us, it's -- whether it be business 11 litigation or bankruptcy litigation, to the 12 extent that there are areas that whoever 13 the law firm -- we've also been appointed 14 by judges, anyone that's looking or 15 interested in obtaining financial 16 information in a form that they're looking 1 7 for, which could be anything, we would 18 provide it. That would include doing 19 expert reports, expert testimony and work 20 at just advising lawyers as they approach 21 areas in accounting and auditing and the 22 like. 23 **Q.** You mentioned here that you're 24 a principal at Verdolino and Lowey? 25 A. Yes. 1 C. JALBERT 2 **Q.** What other roles have you held? 3 A. I've been a principal since I 4 started. 5 Q. Turning to the engagement here, Page 22 6 who contacted V erdolino and Lowey about 7 this engagement? 8 A. Well, it was contacted me 9 personally and it was an attorney, Steven 10 Pohl at Brown Rudnick. 11 Q. Sorry, I missed what you said. 12 MR HARBACH: Spell that name. 13 **Q.** Can you spell that name, 14 please? 15 A. The name was Steven Pohl. Last 16 name P-O-H-L at Brown Rudnick. 17 Q. Mr. Pohl reached out to who at 18 Verdolino and Lowey? 19 A. Me. 20 **Q.** You. Do you recall when that 21 was? 22 A. Somewhere around March 1, 2 or 23 3. 24 **Q.** After Steven Pohl reached out, 25 who did Verdolino and Lowey speak to Page 23 C. JALBERT 2 generally regarding the engagement? 3 A. There was a little bit with 4 Steven Pohl and with -- I believe it was 5 Ben Silverberg. 6 Q. Anyone else at Brown Rudnick? 7 A. I don't remember. 8 Q. Besides Brown Rudnick, did you 9 speak to anyone else regarding the 10 potential engagement? 11 A. I probably mentioned something 12 to my -- my own staff to clear conflicts 13 and I think I had someone help me prepare 14 some -- I shouldn't say prepare, they're 15 already prepared. Send some individual 16 information about myself and the firm. 1 7 Q. Did Verdolino and Lowey speak 18 to anyone else besides Brown Rudnick in 19 connection with the engagement? 20 MR AULET: Objection. You can 21 answer. 22 A. At the time we're being 23 engaged? 24 **Q.** Yes. 25 A. No. 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. Who are the main points of 3 contact between -- who are the main 4 contacts for -- strike that. Who do you 5 generally speak to regarding this 6 engagement besides internal folks at 7 Verdolino and Lowey? 8 A. Mostly the attorneys at Brown 9 Rudnick. 10 Q. Do you speak to anyone else? 11 A. I've been on phone calls with 12 other lawyers but I've not initiated 13 anything. 14 Q. Which other lawyers have you 15 been on phone calls with? 16 A. The other debtor lawyers that 1 7 I'm aware of are an Aaron Mitchell and a 18 Melissa Francis. 19 Q. Who do you understand Aaron 20 Mitchell to be? 21 A. Counsel to Mr. Kwok, the 22 debtor. 23 Q. You mentioned Melissa Francis? 24 A. Also counsel to Mr. Kwok. 25 Q. Besides Aaron Mitchell and Page 24 Page 25\n\n85\n\n7 (Pages 22 - 25)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 Melissa Francis, do you speak to anyone 3 else outside ofVerdolino and Lowey 4 regarding this engagement? 5 A. And outside of Brown Rudnick? 6 **Q.** Outside of Brown Rudnick, yes. 7 A. No one. 8 **Q.** What about -- what about do you 9 communicate via e-mail with anyone besides 10 Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Brown 11 Rudnick regarding this engagement? 12 A. I've been on -- I've been CC'd 13 on an e-mail and authored one e-mail to 14 someone outside that group. 15 Q. Who is that person? 16 MR AULET: Objection. This is 1 7 the person that we have stated their 18 identity won't be revealed per Golden 19 Springs request. 20 **MS. ARONSSON:** Are you 21 instructing the Witness not to 22 answer? 23 MR AULET: I am instructing 24 him not to answer. 25 MS. ARONSSON: Can you just 1 C. JALBERT 2 state -- 3 MR GOLDMAN: Can you repeat 4 the question? 5 (Whereupon, the referred-to 6 question was read back by the 7 Reporter.) Page 26 8 THE WITNESS: That should have 9 been e-mails. I authored one but I 10 was CC'd on e-mails. 11 Q. I understand Mr. Aul et is 12 instructing you not to answer. 13 MS. ARONSSON: Mr. Aulet, do 14 you mind just providing a more 15 detailed objection? 16 MR AULET: Sure. Based on my 1 7 conversations with Golden Spring, my 18 understanding is that Golden Spring 19 believes that revealing that 20 individual's name would potentially 21 expose them to harassment and based 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. So I'll just go on record to 3 say that we dispute that contention. 4 MR GOLDMAN: As do we. Who 5 6 7 8 are you -- who do you fear harassment from? Do you fear harassment from? 9 10 11 12 13 MR AULET: So Mr. -- Golden Spring's attorney is on the phone and that question is probably best directed to Golden Springs but my understanding is that -- please, he would like to answer. MR MILTENBERGER: Tim 14 Miltenberger from Golden Springs. 15 I'm assuming what the Witness is 16 testifying to is the identity of a 17 Golden Spring employee which isn't 18 clear to me from the record but 19 apparently the people at the 20 deposition reached that conclusion. 21 We don't see any relevance in 22 revealing the name of the employees 23 of Golden Spring based on the 24 objection that's filed to the DIP 25 financing motion and we think that 1 C. JALBERT 2 the privacy rights of our employees 3 are paramount to any information that 4 might be gathered from knowing the 5 name of -- rank and file employees of 6 Golden Spring and we oppose 7 disclosing that information. 8 MR GOLDMAN: That's up to the 9 Judge. It's a totally inappropriate 10 instruction to direct the Witness not 11 to answer. The Witness can answer 12 and you can get a ruling from the Page 28 13 Judge as to whether the answer should 14 be stricken or protected or subject 15 to a protective order. It's totally 16 inappropriate to direct the Witness 1 7 not to answer. 18 MS. ARONSSON: I noted our 19 dispute with Mr. Aulet and I'll just 20 note our dispute with Mr. 21 Miltenberger's reasoning behind the 22 objection here. 85\n\n- 22 on my review of the documents at\n- 23 issue, the person's identity is not\n- 24 relevant to the issues at hand in 25 this deposition.\n\n$$\\text{Pages } \\mathfrak{T}$$\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n8 (Pages 26 - 29)\n\n23 MR MILTENBERGER: Thank you.\n\n24 **Q.** Turning back to the folks we 25 were just talking about, you mentioned\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                     | 1        | C. JALBERT                                      |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 Melissa Francis. Did she represent to you                                                    |          | 2 sure I wasn't missing anything.               |\n|    | 3 that she was Mr. Kwok's counsel?                                                             | 3        | Q.<br>Besides the attorneys at Brown            |\n| 4  | A.<br>No.                                                                                      |          | 4 Rudnick, did you circulate drafts of that     |\n| 5  | How did you learn about what<br>Q.                                                             |          | 5 engagement letter to anyone else?             |\n|    | 6 Ms. Melissa Francis --<br>who Mr. -- strike                                                  | 6        | I don't recall anyone else<br>A.                |\n|    | 7 that. How did you learn who Ms. Francis'                                                     |          | 7 being on it but I'm pretty sure they then     |\n|    | 8 client was?                                                                                  |          | 8 did circulate it with --<br>at a minimum, Ms. |\n| 9  | A.<br>From Brown Rudnick.                                                                      |          | 9 Melissa Francis and probably Aaron Mitchell   |\n| 10 | We've talked about the folks at<br>Q.                                                          |          | 10 as well.                                     |\n|    | 11 Verdolino that you communicate with this                                                    | 11       | MS. ARONSSON: Tab 11. The                       |\n|    | 12 engagement. Do you know of anyone else                                                      | 12       | Court Reporter is going to hand you             |\n|    | 13 that Verdolino and Lowey communicates with                                                  | 13       | what is being marked as Jalbert                 |\n|    | 14 regarding this engagement besides the folks                                                 | 14       | Exhibit 2. This document -- for the             |\n|    | 15 that we've talked about?                                                                    | 15       | record, this document bears the Bates           |\n| 16 | A.<br>I don't think there were others                                                          | 16       | Number Kwok 00001646.                           |\n|    | 17 but it is possible that one of my                                                           | 1 7      | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                    |\n|    | 18 colleagues met Flynn. Might have had                                                        | 18       | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 2 for                 |\n|    | 19 e-mail contact. You're aware -- because I                                                   | 19       | identification as of this date by the           |\n|    | 20 think you objected to --<br>there's a large                                                 | 20       | Reporter.)                                      |\n|    | 21 number of ordinary course professionals.                                                    | 21       | Q.<br>Before we get to the exhibit,             |\n|    | 22 We needed to get information about                                                          |          | 22 what is a post-petition retainer?            |\n|    | 23 liabilities to them for the schedules.                                                      | 23       | My understanding would be a<br>A.               |\n|    | 24 There might have been some information and                                                  |          | 24 retainer paid to whoever, after the filing   |\n|    | 25 stuff because we needed --<br>it's possible                                                 |          | 25 of a bankruptcy, intended to be a retainer.  |\n|    | Page 30                                                                                        |          | Page 32                                         |\n|    |                                                                                                |          |                                                 |\n|    |                                                                                                |          |                                                 |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                     | 1        | C. JALBERT                                      |\n|    | 2 that he spoke with them but I think really                                                   | 2        | Can you please tum to Page 2<br>Q.              |\n|    | 3 what he did is he got all the information                                                    |          | 3 of this document? Take a minute. At the       |\n|    | 4 from Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis. I                                                   |          | 4 top of Page 2, Mr. Silverberg says that       |\n|    | 5 don't think he went outside of that but                                                      |          | 5 there's no post-petition retainer expected.   |\n|    | 6 it's possible.                                                                               |          | 6 Do you see that?                              |\n| 7  | Q.<br>Do you know where Aaron                                                                  | 7        | A.<br>Yes.                                      |\n|    | 8 Mitchell and Melissa Francis retrieved                                                       | 8        | Q.<br>Do you recall whether you had a           |\n|    | 9 their information from?                                                                      |          | 9 preference about receiving a post-petition    |\n| 10 | A.<br>No.                                                                                      |          | 10 retainer?                                    |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Did you ask them where they                                                              | 11       | A.<br>Well, every professional would            |\n|    | 12 retrieved their information from?                                                           |          | 12 rather have a retainer but frankly, under    |\n| 13 | A.<br>No.                                                                                      |          | 13 the circumstances, it wasn't expected.       |\n| 14 | Q.<br>Who negotiated --<br>who, from                                                           | 14       | Q.<br>Starting with your preference,            |\n|    | 15 Verdolino and Lowey, negotiated the                                                         |          | 15 why would you prefer to have a               |\n|    | 16 engagement letter?                                                                          |          | 16 post-petition retainer?                      |\n| 17 | A.<br>It would be me. I don't know                                                             | 17       | Security against the payment of<br>A.           |\n|    | 18 that I would call it a negotiation but it                                                   |          | 18 the fees.                                    |\n|    | 19 was me that drafted it and prepared it and                                                  | 19       | Q.<br>Do you know whether you                   |\n|    | 20 sent it to Brown Rudnick.                                                                   |          | 20 received a post-petition retainer in         |\n| 21 | Anyone else involved in<br>Q.                                                                  |          | 21 connection with this case?                   |\n|    | 22 drafting that engagement letter?                                                            | 22       | A.<br>I do.                                     |\n| 23 | A.<br>Well, from a QPC perspective,                                                            | 23       | Q.<br>Did you?                                  |\n|    | 24 I'm sure I had one of my colleagues, Mary<br>25 Jo Schindler take a look at it just to make | 24<br>25 | A.<br>No.<br>Q.<br>And why not?                 |\n\n9 (Pages 30 - 33)\n\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                     | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                |\n|-----|------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2   | I didn't ask for one.<br>A.                    | 2  | Yep.<br>A.                                                |\n| 3   | Turning back to the e-mail, Mr.<br>Q.          | 3  | Did you ask for a post-petition<br>Q.                     |\n|     | 4 Silverberg writes, \"big Q is whether it's    |    | 4 retainer in connection with this                        |\n|     | 5 us retaining you or the client. I would      |    | 5 engagement?                                             |\n|     | 6 think you're retained by the client as his   | 6  | No.<br>A.                                                 |\n|     | 7 financial advisor\". Do you recall that       | 7  | Do you know if Verdolino and<br>Q.                        |\n|     | 8 being a question in connection with this     |    | 8 Lowey asked for a post-petition retainer in             |\n|     | 9 engagement?                                  |    | 9 connection with this engagement?                        |\n| 10  | MR AULET: Objection to form.                   | 10 | A.<br>I do.                                               |\n| 11  | A.<br>I don't think I understand your          | 11 | What's the answer?<br>Q.                                  |\n|     | 12 question. I can read the statement and      | 12 | A.<br>No.                                                 |\n|     | 13 understand but I don't know what you're     | 13 | Youalsowrite,\"butlthinkif<br>Q.                           |\n|     | 14 asking.                                     |    | 14 we are going to hold the cash, we will need            |\n| 15  | He says, \"big Q\", do you<br>Q.                 |    | 15 to be employed by the debtor\". So does                 |\n|     | 16 understand that to be a big question?       |    | 16 that refresh your recollection about                   |\n| 1 7 | A.<br>I understand it might be a               |    | 17 whether it was a question about who was                |\n|     | 18 question in his mind. I don't know that he  |    | 18 retaining Verdolino and Lowey?                         |\n|     | 19 intended it to be a question for me or for  | 19 | A.<br>I don't think I had a question                      |\n|     | 20 himself and then he answered it.            |    | 20 in my mind. I just responded with a                    |\n| 21  | MS. ARONSSON: Makenzie, can                    |    | 21 comment that supported his previous comment            |\n| 22  | you hand me Tab 12?                            |    | 22 where he said I would think you're retained            |\n| 23  | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Mr. Jalbert,                 |    | 23 by the client as his financial advisor.                |\n| 24  | would you mind moving the water                | 24 | Generally, can you explain your<br>Q.                     |\n| 25  | bottle? It's coming up in the frame.           |    | 25 view in connection with the question                   |\n|     | Page 34                                        |    | Page 36                                                   |\n|     |                                                |    |                                                           |\n|     |                                                |    |                                                           |\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                     | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                |\n| 2   | I apologize. Thank you.                        |    | 2 Mr. Silverberg poses about who was                      |\n| 3   | THE WITNESS: Sorry about that.                 |    | 3 retaining Verdolino and Lowey?                          |\n| 4   | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: I appreciate                 | 4  | A.<br>Well, I was pretty sure when he                     |\n| 5   | that.                                          |    | 5 wrote I would think you're going to be                  |\n| 6   | MS. ARONSSON: The Court                        |    | 6 retained by the client as his financial                 |\n| 7   | Reporter is going to mark what is              |    | 7 advisor, that's --<br>I made a gratuitous               |\n| 8   | going to be Jalbert Exhibit 3. This            |    | 8 comment or not a gratuitous comment. I                  |\n| 9   | document is Bates stamped Kwok                 |    | 9 made an assenting comment basically saying              |\n| 10  | 00001649.                                      |    | 10 I think if we're going to hold the cash, we            |\n| 11  | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                   |    | 11 need to be employed by the debtor. So                  |\n| 12  | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 3 for                |    | 12 concurring with the decision or the thought            |\n| 13  | identification as of this date by the          |    | 13 that he had.                                           |\n| 14  | Reporter.)                                     | 14 | What is the basis for the<br>Q.                           |\n| 15  | Please take a look at this<br>Q.               |    | 15 understanding that you just explained?                 |\n|     | 16 document.                                   | 16 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                              |\n| 17  | A.<br>Okay.                                    | 17 | Of what part?<br>A.                                       |\n| 18  | You're responding to Mr.<br>Q.                 | 18 | Where, turning to your e-mail,<br>Q.                      |\n|     | 19 Silverberg's e-mail that we were just       |    | 19 \"ifwe are going to hold the cash, we'll                |\n|     | 20 speaking about with the big Q is whether    |    | 20 need to be employed by the debtor\". What's             |\n|     | 21 it's us retaining you or the client.        |    | 21 the basis of that statement?                           |\n| 22  | A.<br>Okay.                                    | 22 | A.<br>Well, my professional judgment.                     |\n| 23  | Turning to your response, you<br>Q.            |    | 23 If me, as a principal ofVerdolino and                  |\n|     | 24 note, \"I'd like a post-petition retainer if |    | 24 Lowey, was going to be the signer on a                 |\n|     | 25 possible\". Do you see that?<br>Page 35      |    | 25 debtor in possession bank account, it would<br>Page 37 |\n\n10 (Pages 34 - 37)\n\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                                     | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                 |\n|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n|     | 2 make all the sense in the world that that                    | 2  | A.<br>Well, frequently in matters,                                                         |\n|     | 3 debtor in possession was my client. So I'm                   |    | 3 we --<br>the firm gets brought in and we do                                              |\n|     | 4 concurring effectively with the                              |    | 4 whatever work is intended on that                                                        |\n|     | 5 determination that Mr. Silverberg made in                    |    | 5 particular engagement. Frequently, it's                                                  |\n|     | 6 the previous e-mail to this chain.                           |    | 6 litigation support. If it's intended that                                                |\n| 7   | Thank you. Just for my own<br>Q.                               |    | 7 we do an investigation, the lawyer's                                                     |\n|     | 8 understanding, what is the difference                        |    | 8 thinking ahead, look, you're going to do an                                              |\n|     | 9 between being employed by the debtor versus                  |    | 9 investigation, we think this is what we're                                               |\n|     | 10 Brown Rudnick?                                              |    | 10 going to find. Then we're going to have to                                              |\n| 11  | Well, ifl was employed by<br>A.                                |    | 11 get a expert report to file with a                                                      |\n|     | 12 Brown Rudnick, I'm not sure I'd go                          |    | 12 particular court. Then we might need you                                                |\n|     | 13 through --<br>I'm not sure I would have to go               |    | 13 to go through the process of discovery                                                  |\n|     | 14 through the employment process for the                      |    | 14 including records, depositions and the like                                             |\n|     | 15 bankruptcy. Would I file a motion to be                     |    | 15 and then we might need you to testify. In                                               |\n|     | 16 employed? I don't know. I don't know the                    |    | 16 those particular cases, as I understand it,                                             |\n|     | 17 answer to that question. It's not                           |    | 17 there would be privilege up to a certain                                                |\n|     | 18 something that I thought of beyond this.                    |    | 18 point, up until the time I'm declared an                                                |\n|     | but ifl was right and there wouldn't<br>19 So --               |    | 19 expert but in other instances, we get                                                   |\n|     | 20 be an opportunity to file a motion to                       |    | 20 brought in as --<br>as financial advisor to                                             |\n|     | 21 employ Verdolino and Lowey on behalf of the                 |    | 21 the attorneys. They want us to do an                                                    |\n|     | 22 debtor, I don't know how we would then                      |    | 22 investigation. They want us to uncover                                                  |\n|     | 23 allow me to be a signatory on the debtor's                  |    | 23 whatever need to be uncovered, whatever the                                             |\n|     | 24 account.                                                    |    | 24 allegations are, whatever the issues are                                                |\n| 25  | Thank you. That's helpful.<br>Q.                               |    | 25 but they might be hiring another firm or                                                |\n|     | Page 38                                                        |    | Page 40                                                                                    |\n|     |                                                                |    |                                                                                            |\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                                     | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                 |\n|     |                                                                |    |                                                                                            |\n|     | 2 Did you rely on Brown Rudnick in connection                  |    | 2 individual to testify as the expert to keep<br>3 what knowledge we have as privileged. I |\n|     | 3 with that determination of who would be                      |    |                                                                                            |\n|     | 4 retaining Verdolino and Lowey?                               |    | 4 don't know that that's relevant here.<br>Q.                                              |\n| 5   | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                   | 5  | Thank you. Turning back to                                                                 |\n| 6   | A.<br>Well, Mr. Silverberg writes in                           |    | 6 Exhibit 2 --                                                                             |\n|     | 7 his e-mail, \"I would think you're retained                   | 7  | MR MILTENBERGER: I'm sorry to                                                              |\n|     | 8 by the client as his financial advisor\" and                  | 8  | interrupt. I'm being called away to                                                        |\n|     | 9 the next e-mail, same day, when I got                        | 9  | another matter so I'm going to have                                                        |\n|     | 10 around to it at 6:49 p.m. --<br>so five hours               | 10 | to drop off now. The record could                                                          |\n|     | 11 had elapsed --<br>I basically concurred with                | 11 | just note that I'm leaving the                                                             |\n|     | 12 his determination. Who made the decision,                   | 12 | deposition.                                                                                |\n|     | 13 I don't know. It's semantics but I think                    | 13 | MR HARBACH: Thank you, Tim.                                                                |\n|     | 14 it was clear from this point on, that we                    | 14 | You're welcome to rejoin anytime.                                                          |\n|     | 15 were going to be retained by the debtor and                 | 15 | MR MILTENBERGER: Will do,                                                                  |\n|     | 16 not Brown Rudnick.                                          | 16 | thanks.                                                                                    |\n| 1 7 | Q.<br>Is Verdolino and Lowey ever                              | 17 | Q.<br>I'm interested in your e-mail                                                        |\n|     | 18 retained by a law firm in connection with                   |    | 18 at the top where you write, \"my feeling is                                              |\n|     | 19 bankruptcy proceedings?                                     |    | 19 that in an individual case, the FA\" --                                                  |\n| 20  | A.<br>We're frequently retained by                             |    | 20 financial advisor --<br>\"duties are markedly                                            |\n|     | 21 lawyers in proceedings. I think even                        |    | 21 different than of an operating business                                                 |\n|     | 22 including in bankruptcy proceedings for the                 |    | 22 case\". Can you explain to me the                                                        |\n|     | 23 purposes of the privilege.                                  |    | 23 difference between an individual case                                                   |\n| 24  | Q.<br>What do you mean by for<br>25 purposes of the privilege? | 25 | 24 versus an operating business case?<br>A.<br>So operating business cases                 |\n\n11 (Pages 38 - 41)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                 | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                               |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 have their various size and shapes. They                                                 |    | 2 engagement, no one informed you what needed                                            |\n|    | 3 may have affiliated entities, parents,                                                   |    | 3 to be done on this case?                                                               |\n|    | 4 siblings. It could be multiple debtors.                                                  | 4  | A.<br>Well, we had been party to                                                         |\n|    | 5 They might have employees in various                                                     |    | 5 numerous conversations. This is not my                                                 |\n|    | 6 countries, various states. They may have                                                 |    | 6 first bankruptcy. It's not my 50th                                                     |\n|    | 7 payroll taxes un-filed, sales taxes                                                      |    | 7 bankruptcy. It's not my 100th bankruptcy.                                              |\n|    | 8 un-filed, depending on the business, bottle                                              |    | 8 I had a fairly good idea of what the issues                                            |\n|    | 9 deposits un-filed and unkept. They                                                       |    | 9 were going to be and I took the first pass.                                            |\n|    | 10 probably need a lot more work on budgeting                                              |    | 10 I don't recall whether there were changes                                             |\n|    | 11 and keeping the business operating. Does                                                |    | 11 made after that or not.                                                               |\n|    | 12 it have sufficient cash, what are the 13                                                | 12 | Generally, what is the scope of<br>Q.                                                    |\n|    | 13 week budgets, the one year budgets. Cash                                                |    | 13 Verdolino and Lowey's work in this case?                                              |\n|    | 14 collateral where it's --<br>you've got a                                                | 14 | A.<br>In this case?                                                                      |\n|    | 15 secured creditor who is frequently --<br>maybe                                          | 15 | Q.<br>Yes.                                                                               |\n|    | 16 not against the debtor but maybe not with                                               | 16 | A.<br>Well, the retention papers                                                         |\n|    | 17 it either. So --<br>so there's just --<br>it's a                                        |    | 17 speak for themselves. So if you want to go                                            |\n|    | 18 totally different beast. In this                                                        |    | 18 line by line, put that in front of me.                                                |\n|    | 19 particular case, some individuals have                                                  | 19 | Sure.<br>Q.                                                                              |\n|    | 20 operating real estate or something like                                                 | 20 | A.<br>To date, we've been focused                                                        |\n|    | 21 that but they rarely have an operating                                                  |    | first, my recollection is the SOF A's<br>21 on --                                        |\n|    | 22 business that's multi country, multi state                                              |    | 22 and the schedules pretty much                                                         |\n|    | 23 with employees and all sorts of reporting                                               |    | 23 simultaneously. I mean they were due the                                              |\n|    | 24 requirements, compliance requirements.                                                  |    | 24 same day, same time. So that was first.                                               |\n| 25 | Is it fair to say the financial<br>Q.<br>Page 42                                           |    | 25 Following --<br>immediately following that, I<br>Page 44                              |\n|    |                                                                                            |    |                                                                                          |\n|    |                                                                                            |    |                                                                                          |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                 | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                               |\n|    | 2 advisor duties in connection with an                                                     |    | 2 believe we worked on everybody's engagement                                            |\n|    | 3 operating business case are more                                                         |    | 3 papers to get them filed in the Court and                                              |\n|    | 4 complicated than an individual case?                                                     |    | probably while the tail end of that<br>4 then --                                         |\n| 5  | A.<br>In most, yes.                                                                        |    | 5 was going along, I believe my colleague,                                               |\n| 6  | Q.<br>Turning away from the exhibit,                                                       |    | 6 Matt Flynn, started preparing the monthly                                              |\n|    | 7 who instructed Verdolino and Lowey on the                                                |    | 7 operating report that was due for the end                                              |\n|    | 8 scope of work in this matter?                                                            |    | 8 of February, sometime around March 20, 21,                                             |\n| 9  | A.<br>I don't think anyone instructed                                                      |    | 9 22, somewhere around there. Trying to                                                  |\n|    | 10 us.                                                                                     |    | 10 think if we've done anything --<br>oh                                                 |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Because you drafted the                                                              |    | or<br>11 assistance in preparing for --                                                  |\n|    | 12 engagement letter?                                                                      |    | 12 participation in preparing, to a small                                                |\n| 13 | A.<br>I'm sure there were discussions                                                      |    | 13 degree, for the debtor to attend the 341                                              |\n|    | 14 with counsel. I don't remember the                                                      |    | 14 meeting. We attended the first day 341                                                |\n|    | 15 discussions specifically but this is not                                                |    | 15 meeting by telephone. My colleague, Matt                                              |\n|    | 16 the first time I've drafted a retention --                                              |    | 16 Flynn and I, attended the second day of the                                           |\n|    | 17 at least part of the retention papers.                                                  |    | 17 341 hearing which was this past Wednesday                                             |\n|    | 18 Obviously, I'm not a lawyer. I don't know                                               |    | how do I want to call it --<br>18 on a --<br>we                                          |\n|    | 19 all of that goes into retention papers but<br>20 as to the duties, typically, I have an |    | 19 didn't bill for our time. I went as an<br>20 observer. We knew we weren't going to be |\n|    | 21 input as to what the duties are. I'm sure                                               |    | 21 participating but we wanted to be around to                                           |\n|    | 22 we took the first stab at it and in review                                              |    | 22 see what took place, meet people and then                                             |\n|    | 23 by Brown Rudnick, they might have made some 23 this deposition.                         |    |                                                                                          |\n|    | 24 changes. I don't remember how that went.                                                | 24 | Q.<br>Thank you. So I think I heard                                                      |\n| 25 | In connection with the<br>Q.<br>Page 43                                                    |    | 25 the SOFA's and schedules were the first<br>Page 45                                    |\n\n```\n12 (Pages 42 - 45)\n```\n1 C. JALBERT 2 step. You talked about drafting everyone's 3 engagement papers in connection with this 4 matter. 5 A. Well, drafting our engagement 6 papers. Everyone was focusing on their own 7 and I needed help, because I'm not a 8 lawyer, on mine. 9 **Q.** Then you talked about Matt 10 Flynn's responsibilities in connection with 11 the monthly operating report. 12 A. Yes. 13 **Q.** Finally, you talked about 14 preparing for the 341 hearing and attending 15 the 341 hearings? 16 A. Meeting, yes. 17 Q. Can you describe a little bit 18 more your responsibilities in connection 19 with those 341 meetings? 20 MR AULET: I would just 21 caution the Witness not to disclose 22 any work product or conversations 23 with attorneys. 24 A. On the first day of the 341 25 meeting, it was just thought that we should Page 46 1 **C. JALBERT**  2 participate because it was unclear what was 3 going to arise and they didn't know if it 4 would be something that we would need. 5 Q. Setting aside your 6 conversations with your attorneys, what -- 7 did you have any understanding about what 8 might arise during the first day of the 341 9 hearing that might require your 10 participation? 11 A. I've attended an awful lot of 12 341 meetings over my career. Anything can 13 happen at a 341 meeting because it's open 14 to every creditor and god only knows what 15 takes place. 16 Q. Did you anticipate having to 1 7 participate or ask questions during the 18 341? 19 A. I think we were asked to be on 20 the phone. I didn't have a participation 21 one way or another. 22 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 23 Reporter is going to hand you what is 24 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 4. 25 (Whereupon, Debtor's Page 47 1 C. JALBERT 2 Application was marked as Jalbert 3 Exhibit 4 for identification as of 4 this date by the Reporter.) 5 **MS. ARONSSON:** For the record, 6 this is a document entitled Debtors 7 Application for Authorization to 8 Retain and Employ Verdolino and Lowey 9 PC as Financial Advisor. It was 10 filed in this case as Docket 90. 11 Q. Mr. Jalbert, feel free to look 12 at this document. 13 A. Is there something you're 14 trying to point me to? 15 Q. Do you recognize this document? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. What is it? 18 A. Debtor's Application for 19 Authorization to Retain and Employ 20 Verdolino and Lowey PC as Financial 21 Advisor. 22 Q. Turning to Page 18 ofthe 23 document, using the page numbers at the top 24 of the page, what is this document? 25 A. Affidavit of Craig **R.** Jalbert Page 48 1 C. JALBERT 2 in Support of Debtor's Application for 3 Authorization to Retain and Employ 4 Verdolino and Lowey PC as Financial 5 Advisor. 6 **Q.** So you recognize this as your 7 affidavit you filed -- 8 A. I do. 9 **Q.** Turning to Page 21, the table 10 -- I'm interested in the table at the 11 bottom of the page. 12 A. Yes. 13 **Q.** Just stepping back I think you 14 mentioned folks at Verdolino who were 15 involved, Matt Flynn -- in this case, Matt 16 Flynn, Mary Jo Schindler and yourself. Is 17 there anyone else involved in this matter 18 at Verdolino and Lowey? 19 A. I mentioned Tim MacDonald, our 20 IT person who is only involved with -- 21 related to the deposition, the search of 22 our e-mails and the server records and 23 everything and getting it ported over to 24 Brown Rudnick to be then sent to you folks. 25 Q. Anyone else at Verdolino and Page 49\n\n13 (Pages 46 - 49)\n\n| 1     | C. JALBERT                                          | 1  | C. JALBERT                                        |\n|-------|-----------------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------------|\n|       | 2 Lowey?                                            |    | 2 different than any other engagement. You        |\n| 3     | A.<br>Not that I know of.                           |    | 3 don't know what's going to happen in            |\n| 4     | Q.<br>Turning to this table, is Matt                |    | 4 day-to-day and everyone responds as best        |\n|       | 5 Flynn also a principal?                           |    | 5 they can, as efficiently as they can and        |\n| 6     | A.<br>No.                                           |    | 6 whatever the issues are that are ongoing        |\n| 7     | What is Matt Flynn's role?<br>Q.                    |    | 7 and the crises that materialize.                |\n| 8     | A.<br>A manager.                                    | 8  | What about staff, what sort of<br>Q.              |\n| 9     | Is Mindy Jo Schindler a<br>Q.                       |    | 9 role do you anticipate any potential staff      |\n|       | 10 principal?                                       |    | 10 to play in this case?                          |\n| 11    | A.<br>No.                                           | 11 | A.<br>It will depend on how it plays              |\n| 12    | What is her role?<br>Q.                             |    | 12 out. I don't think it's going to happen        |\n| 13    | A.<br>Manager.                                      |    | 13 but if it did and we became --<br>I became the |\n| 14    | Q.<br>So in connection with this                    |    | 14 sole signer on the debtor in possession        |\n|       | 15 engagement at Verdolino and Lowey, there's       |    | 15 bank account, my firm would probably be --     |\n|       | 16 one principal, two managers and then the IT      |    | 16 the bookkeepers would probably keep records    |\n|       | 17 person?                                          |    | 17 of the disbursements and the receipts.         |\n| 18    | A.<br>I believe so, yes.                            |    | 18 They would assist with reporting. I would      |\n| 19    | Do you anticipate other<br>Q.                       |    | 19 probably review it of course. If, at some      |\n|       | 20 Verdolino and Lowey employees to become          |    | 20 point in time, we have claim objections, I     |\n|       | 21 involved in this matter?                         |    | 21 don't know what the nature of those            |\n| 22    | A.<br>As the case progresses,                       |    | 22 objections are going to be, I don't know       |\n|       | 23 assuming that we come into the case, yes.        |    | 23 how big and how complicated but some of our    |\n| 24    | Q.<br>Generally, what are the duties                |    | 24 staff might be involved in claims. The         |\n|       | 25 of a principal in connection with a              |    | 25 debtor might have to file an income tax        |\n|       | Page 50                                             |    | Page 52                                           |\n|       |                                                     |    |                                                   |\n| 1     | C. JALBERT                                          | 1  | C. JALBERT                                        |\n|       | 2 bankruptcy case like this?                        |    | 2 return. I'll be advising them that they         |\n| 3     | I think of it as partner,<br>A.                     |    | 3 should file an income tax return for the        |\n|       | 4 director, managing director, any of those,        |    | 4 Estate. So we'll have tax people involved       |\n|       | 5 the lead person on the case from the firm.        |    | 5 in the preparation of the income taxes and      |\n| 6     | Q.<br>In connection with this matter                |    | 6 I would have to go down the list of --<br>and   |\n|       | 7 specifically, what do you expect the              |    | 7 be able to predict exactly what's going to      |\n|       | 8 principal to be doing?                            |    | 8 take place but we're very efficient, very       |\n| 9     | I assisted in preparation of<br>A.                  |    | 9 accustomed. We know all of our fees are         |\n|       | 10 the SOF A's and schedules, the global notes,     |    | 10 subject to review by every single party and    |\n|       | 11 the specific part of the global notes. I         |    | 11 interest. So we're --<br>we use as reasonably  |\n|       | 12 assisted with the monthly operating report.      |    | 12 low level as we can on every matter and I      |\n|       | 13 I participated with the first day hearings       |    | 13 can't predict beyond that what's going to      |\n| 14 -- | excuse me, first --<br>not the first day            |    | 14 come up but that staff and bookkeepers get     |\n|       | 15 hearing. The first day of the 341 meeting.       |    | 15 used for those types of issues.                |\n|       | 16 Responding to inquiries from the various         | 16 | Is it fair to say your answer<br>Q.               |\n|       | 1 7 lawyers and supporting staff on whatever        |    | 17 to my question about staff applies to the      |\n|       | 18 roles that they are working on.                  |    | 18 bookkeepers, to the role of the                |\n| 19    | Q.<br>What do you expect managers to                |    | 19 bookkeepers?                                   |\n|       | 20 do in connection with this case?                 | 20 | A.<br>No, bookkeepers and staff.                  |\n| 21    | A.<br>The same --<br>the same things.               | 21 | So the answer that you just<br>Q.                 |\n|       | 22 Maybe differing amounts, different types.        |    | 22 gave applies to both of those?                 |\n|       | 23 I'm more review. Depending on what it is,        | 23 | A.<br>You asked what they may do.                 |\n|       | 24 they might support me. I might support           | 24 | Q.<br>Right.                                      |\n|       | 25 them. It's like this engagement is no<br>Page 51 | 25 | A.<br>They're --<br>the bookkeepers<br>Page 53    |\n\n```\n14 (Pages 50 - 53)\n```\n1 C. JALBERT 2 aren't going to do reporting but they're 3 going to maintain receipts and 4 disbursements. A staff person would 5 probably work on the form of the -- of a 6 financial statement or whatever report 7 that's going to be issued. The staff are 8 going to work on claims objections. Tax 9 professionals are going to work on tax 10 returns. 11 Q. Are you finished with your 12 answer? 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. You mentioned receipts and 15 disbursements. What sorts ofreceipts and 16 disbursements do you anticipate in this 17 case? 18 A. I would imagine if things were 19 to go the way the debtor planned, there was 20 a proposed DIP financing arrangement where 21 money will come into the Estate and then 22 would presumably be used to pay various 23 professionals and United States Trustee 24 fees and whatever other disbursements are 25 required of the debtor as ordered by the Page 54 1 C. JALBERT 2 Court or otherwise generally required to 3 pay Chapter 11 bills as they become due. I 4 think that's it. 5 **Q.** The last item is clerical. 6 What sort of duties do you anticipate a 7 clerical member of your team to do in this 8 case? 9 A. I don't have anything that I 10 have presupposed for them to do in this 11 case. 12 Q. Turning back in the document to 13 the retention agreement, this is on Page 14 13. We've talked generally about the 15 engagement -- Verdolino and Lowey's 16 engagement in this case. I want to walk 1 7 through these bullet points on the first 18 page. The first one reads, \"assistance 19 with preparation of the statement of 20 financial affairs and the schedules and all 21 support thereto and any amendments\". These 22 have been filed, right? 23 A. Yes. 24 **Q.** Who was involved in preparing 25 the SOFA and the schedules? Page 55 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. From my firm? 3 Q. Who atV&L? 4 A. Myself, Matthew Flynn and Mary 5 Jo Schindler. 6 **Q.** Who else was involved in 7 preparing these filings? 8 A. There might have been a 9 technical question for someone related to 10 the best case but I can't think of anything 11 else -- anyone else that had any -- that 12 did work on it. 13 Q. Did Brown Rudnick work on the 14 SOFA and schedules? 15 A. You asked me for my firm. Of 16 course they worked on them, as did Melissa, 17 as did -- that's Melissa Francis. As did 18 Aaron Mitchell. So it was clearly not all 19 Verdolino and Lowey. It was -- the whole 20 team was involved in the preparation. I 21 thought you asked me -- and if I 22 misunderstood, I apologize -- you asked 23 who, at Verdolino, did and that was myself, 24 Matt Flynn and Mary Jo Schindler. 25 **Q.** Thank you. Yes, I did ask Page 56 **C. JALBERT**  2 Verdolino and Lowey and was then moving on. 3 So you mentioned Melissa Francis, Aaron 4 Mitchell, Brown Rudnick. Generally, anyone 5 else? 6 A. While I never spoke to them, 7 there must have been the existence of help 8 from individuals that translated documents 9 and words from the various professionals to 10 the debtor and the debtor. 11 **Q. Did** you communicate with the 12 debtor about this SOFA and schedules? 13 A. No. 14 Q. You mentioned some translated 15 documents. Did you receive those 16 translated documents in connection with 17 your work on the SOFA and schedules? 18 A. No. I don't read Mandarin. 19 Q. Did you see any translated 20 documents? 21 A. I don't recall seeing them. 22 MR AULET: Objection to form. 23 **Q.** Do you know whether Golden 24 Spring was involved in preparing the SOFA 25 and schedules? Page 57\n\n85\n\n15 (Pages 54 - 57)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                            | 1  | C. JALBERT                                         |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------|----|----------------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | A.<br>I wouldn't know.                                |    | 2 doing in connection with the SOFA and            |\n| 3  | Q.<br>Do you know what Golden Spring                  |    | 3 schedule?                                        |\n|    | 4 is?                                                 | 4  | A.<br>I don't know that it's                       |\n| 5  | A.<br>Yes.                                            |    | 5 anticipated but to the extent facts and          |\n| 6  | What is it?<br>Q.                                     |    | 6 circumstances, at some point in time,            |\n| 7  | A.<br>It's --<br>as I understand it --<br>a           |    | 7 require a review and possible amendment, I       |\n|    | 8 family office in New York City for the              |    | 8 think we would have to participate because       |\n|    | 9 debtor's son. Exactly how it's run, all             |    | 9 we're the ones that know Best Case and have      |\n|    | 10 that, I don't have any information.                |    | 10 that system but there's nothing                 |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Who is the debtor's son?                        |    | 11 anticipated. It's only if that                  |\n| 12 | A.<br>I don't know his name.                          |    | 12 materializes, we would participate.             |\n|    | 13 Debtor's son.                                      | 13 | Q.<br>You've said --you've mentioned               |\n| 14 | Neither you nor anyone at<br>Q.                       |    | 14 Best Case a couple times. What do you mean      |\n|    | 15 Verdolino and Lowey met with or                    |    | 15 by that?                                        |\n|    | 16 communicated with the debtor about the SOFA        | 16 | A.<br>It's a software that the                     |\n|    | 17 and schedules?                                     |    | 17 industry uses. I think it's the most            |\n| 18 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                          |    | 18 prominent software that supports the            |\n| 19 | A.<br>Correct.                                        |    | 19 preparation of SOF A's and --<br>SOFA's and the |\n|    |                                                       |    |                                                    |\n| 20 | Can you describe what work<br>Q.                      |    | 20 schedules. I think they're used throughout      |\n|    | 21 Verdolino and Lowey did in preparing the           |    | 21 the industry by most everybody.                 |\n|    | 22 SOFA and schedules?                                | 22 | So is it fair to say it's like<br>Q.               |\n| 23 | We participated with several<br>A.                    |    | 23 a TurboTax of preparing SOFA's and              |\n|    | 24 lengthy phone calls with various people            |    | 24 schedules?                                      |\n|    | 25 from Brown Rudnick, not all of whom I'm<br>Page 58 | 25 | Or QuickBooks or --you know.<br>A.<br>Page 60      |\n|    |                                                       |    |                                                    |\n|    |                                                       |    |                                                    |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                            | 1  | C. JALBERT                                         |\n|    | 2 going to remember were on the phone and             | 2  | So that software is essentially<br>Q.              |\n|    | 3 also with Melissa Francis and Aaron                 |    | 3 garbage in, garbage out, right?                  |\n|    | 4 Mitchell. Aaron Mitchell and Melissa                | 4  | MR AULET: Objection.                               |\n|    | 5 Francis provided significant levels of              | 5  | A.<br>Every software is garbage in,                |\n|    | 6 input of various information. Brown                 |    | 6 garbage out.                                     |\n|    | 7 Rudnick had been involved in the case               | 7  | Turning to the second bullet<br>Q.                 |\n|    | 8 before we were. They already had a large            |    | 8 point in the retention agreement, it reads,      |\n|    | 9 knowledge base so we --<br>we talked with           |    | 9 \"assistance with preparation and/or review       |\n|    | 10 Brown Rudnick team and Melissa and Aaron on        |    | 10 of cash flow and related budget projections     |\n|    | 11 the phone and then numerous e-mails.               |    | 11 and including advising as to post-filing        |\n| 12 | THE WITNESS: I agree. Hot.                            |    | 12 finances\". Do you see that?                     |\n| 13 | MR HARBACH: Yeah, I tried to                          | 13 | A.<br>Yes.                                         |\n| 14 | keep out the sun.                                     | 14 | Q.<br>What work has Verdolino and                  |\n| 15 | Q.<br>Did Verdolino and Lowey perform                 |    | 15 Lowey done in connection with this line         |\n|    | 16 any investigation to verify information            |    | 16 item?                                           |\n|    | 17 obtained from Brown Rudnick, Melissa               | 17 | A.<br>Nothing.                                     |\n|    | 18 Francis or Aaron Mitchell?                         | 18 | Q.<br>What work does Verdolino and                 |\n| 19 | A.<br>No.                                             |    | 19 Lowey anticipate doing in connection with       |\n| 20 | So is it fair to say you took<br>Q.                   |    | 20 this line item?                                 |\n|    | 21 their word regarding the representations           | 21 | Anticipate doing this if we're<br>A.               |\n|    | 22 contained in the SOFA and the schedule?            |    | 22 in the case and there's a DIP.                  |\n| 23 | A.<br>That's fair.                                    | 23 | So it includes budget<br>Q.                        |\n| 24 | Is there any outstanding work<br>Q.                   |    | 24 projections. Budget projections for who?        |\n|    | 25 that Verdolino and Lowey will anticipate           | 25 | A.<br>I imagine we will try and                    |\n\n16 (Pages 58 - 61)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 1 C. JALBERT 2 establish what a budget would be for -- for 2 DIP loan in this case? 3 instance, committee counsel and its 3 A. Hope so. 4 financial advisors, debtor's counsel and 4 Q. Do you have experience with DIP 5 their financial advisors, the United States 5 loans? 6 Trustees fees. There were a number of 6 A. Yes. 7 firms that were intended to be ordinary 7 Q. How much experience do you 8 course professionals and any other 8 have? 9 anticipated disbursement in the case that's 9 A. I don't know how many hundred 10 approved in one way, shape or form by court 10 cases with DIP loans. 11 order. 11 Q. What work has Verdolino and 12 Q. It also includes review of cash 12 Lowey done in connection with this line 13 flow. What cash flow? 13 item? 14 A. The DIP money. 14 MR AULET: Objection to form. 15 Q. The debtor has no income, 15 A. We're talking about the third 16 right? 16 one, right, opening and maintaining the DIP 17 A. To my knowledge, correct. 17 account? 18 Q. Have you reviewed the debtor's 18 Q. Yes. 19 declaration filed in this case? 19 A. The only thing I did, when 20 A. I certainly reviewed one or two 20 asked by Brown Rudnick if I'd be willing, 21 of the drafts of it. I don't know that I 21 is I consulted with a bank that does -- 22 saw the final or not. I don't remember. 22 that's on the list of approved financial 23 Q. Are there cash flows coming in 23 institutions of the Department of Justice. 24 from any source at the moment? 24 I checked with that bank, which I use 25 A. Into the Estate? 25 frequently in and out of bankruptcy, to Page 62 Page 64 1 C. JALBERT 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. Yes. 2 confirm that they would allow me to be a 3 A. Not to my knowledge. 3 signer on the DIP account and they 4 Q. Your knowledge of the debtor's 4 responded in yes. That's the extent of 5 lack of income is based on what you've been 5 which I've done on that. 6 told, is that right? 6 Q. Is that Citizens Bank that 7 A. Yes. 7 you're referencing? 8 Q. No independent investigation in 8 A. Yes. 9 connection with his income? 9 Q. Has Verdolino and Lowey been 10 A. Correct. 10 involved in the negotiation of the 11 Q. This line item also references 11 potential **DIP** loan? 12 post-filing finances. What is meant by 12 A. No. 13 that? 13 Q. Has Verdolino and Lowey been 14 A. He filed on February 15th. 14 included on any communications regarding 15 Whatever finances, cash receipts, cash 15 the potential **DIP** loan? 16 disbursements, budgeting from that day 16 A. I don't know. 17 forward. 17 Q. Have you personally been 18 Q. The third line item reads, 18 involved in any written or oral 19 \"opening and maintaining the **DIP** account 19 communications regarding the **DIP** loan? 20 and effectuating disbursements when 20 A. I don't recall any. 21 necessary and providing accounting of all 21 Q. Do you have an understanding as 22 cash activity\". Is it your understanding 22 to how the potential **DIP** loan would be 23 there's a DIP loan here? 23 structured? 24 A. No. 24 A. Well, I briefly read the DIP 25 Q. Do you anticipate there being a 25 loan at some point in time. I don't have Page 63 Page 65\n\n<sup>17 (</sup>Pages 62 - 65)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 an explicit memory of every -- of the whole 3 thing but I know generally how **DIP** loans 4 work. 5 Q. In this case, do you know how 6 the **DIP** loan would potentially be 7 structured? 8 A. I would have to be guessing at 9 mymemory. 10 **Q.** Who, at Verdolino and Lowey, 11 would perform the work in connection with 12 this line item? 13 MR AULET: Objection to form. 14 A. Presupposing that there is a 15 DIP loan? 16 Q. Yes. 1 7 A. It would -- as repeating, 18 obviously, I would be the signatory on the 19 account. There would be bookkeepers and 20 staff associated with preparing the checks, 21 preparing the reports and reporting to all 22 the parties that be. Some -- I imagine the 23 committee would want to know -- generally, 24 they would like to know on a weekly or 25 biweekly basis what receipts and 1 C. JALBERT 2 disbursements are, major creditors might 3 feel the same way. So whatever the -- 4 whatever the case is, reporting Page 66 5 requirements as they develop, we would take 6 care of that. I don't know what they would 7 be. Aside from the minimum requirement, 8 the monthly operating report. 9 Q. What is Verdolino and Lowey's 10 run rate up until this point? 11 A. What's a run rate? 12 Q. How much has Verdolino and 13 Lowey billed to this matter? 14 A. We've billed zero so far. 15 Q. How much value does Verdolino 16 anticipate it has already billed in this 17 case? 18 A. Are you asking for a WIP to 19 date? 20 Q. What is a WIP to date? 21 A. Work in process hours? 22 Q. Yes, please. 23 A. I have no idea. 24 Q. Does Verdolino and Lowey have 25 any agreement with anyone regarding who Page 67 C. JALBERT 2 will pay the fees in the event the DIP loan 3 does not occur? 4 A. No. 5 **Q.** Let's tum to the next line 6 item, \"preparation, review and analysis of 7 monthly operating reports and/or quarterly 8 reporting\". Do you see that? 9 A. Yes. 10 **Q.** You referenced earlier a 11 monthly operating report that was recently 12 filed in this case? 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. Is that the type of work 15 anticipated in this-- in connection with 16 this line item? 17 A. Well, going forward, there's 18 going to be a lot more than a monthly 19 operating report because there's going to 20 be -- well, presumably, if there is a **DIP**  21 and if the case continues, there's going to 22 be receipts and disbursements and even if 23 there aren't, the monthly operating report 24 and the US Trustees Office requires that -- 25 the disclosure of all estate professionals Page 68 1 C. JALBERT 2 as they accrue throughout the case. So it 3 didn't happen in the February one because 4 of the scrambling of SOF A's and schedules 5 and 341 meeting and everything else. Going 6 forward, we're going to have to have a 7 report on a monthly basis and a cumulative 8 basis what everybody's fees are, what the 9 cash in and cash out is and part of the 10 monthly operating report calculates the 11 fees due to the United States Trustee 12 Program and then the monthly operating 13 report, you typically have to also -- you 14 attach to it insurance binders, if things 15 expired. If they weren't usually -- 16 usually, I put them in anyway just to avoid 1 7 confusion and someone looking for it. And 18 then complete copies of the bank 19 statements. The United States Trustees 20 Office also wants balance sheet and P&L and 21 cash flow and what the accounts payable, 22 accounts receivable and all the various -- 23 so the first one was filed. Future ones 24 are going to have a lot more information. 25 Q. Taking a step back, can you Page 69\n\n85\n\n18 (Pages 66 - 69)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                         | 1  | C. JALBERT                                       |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 just explain, generally, what a monthly          | 2  | A.<br>The United States Trustee                  |\n|    | 3 operating report is in a Chapter 11              |    | 3 issues bills predicated on the monthly         |\n|    | 4 individual case?                                 |    | 4 operating report, to what the expenses that    |\n| 5  | A.<br>It's the same or pretty close                |    | 5 meet the definition of a disbursement on       |\n|    | 6 to the same I think as the operating report      |    | 6 account of the U.S. Trustees form, they        |\n|    | 7 in a commercial case. It looked like it to       |    | 7 combine the three months in every calender     |\n|    | 8 me anyway's. But it's the standard --            |    | 8 quarter. So for us, it will be the             |\n|    | 9 during the pendency of the case, the             |    | 9 February 15th, the February 28th stub          |\n|    | 10 operating report, that is required by the       |    | 10 period, plus the March 1 to March 31, that    |\n|    | 11 US Trustees Program, up until the case is       |    | 11 MOR The sum of those 45 days will be in a     |\n|    | 12 dismissed, converted or confirmed.              |    | 12 bill from the U.S. Trustees Office and,       |\n| 13 | Q.<br>So the procedures that you                   |    | 13 assuming it's correct, would have to be       |\n|    | 14 described relating to the work on the           |    | 14 paid before the end of --<br>I believe this   |\n|    | 15 monthly operating report, that presupposes      |    | 15 month.                                        |\n|    | 16 the approval of the DIP loan and managing       | 16 | So is it fair to say that<br>Q.                  |\n|    | 17 of those funds. Is that right?                  |    | 1 7 Verdolino and Lowey is retained to review    |\n| 18 | A.<br>Well, the monthly operating                  |    | 18 the quarterly report?                         |\n|    | 19 report is going to be due irrespective of       | 19 | I don't know if it's listed in<br>A.             |\n|    | of the<br>the accrual of the --<br>20 that. The -- |    | 20 here specifically but certainly the monthly   |\n|    | 21 fees of committee counsel, us, the              |    | 21 operating report is the form that is the      |\n|    | 22 accountant advisor, the debtor, debtor          |    | 22 input to the United States Trustees Office    |\n|    | 23 committee, others, whoever might be paid by     |    | 23 in order to create the bill. So we know --    |\n|    | 24 the Estate including th ordinary course.        |    | 24 and it's the fees are statutorily             |\n|    | 25 Even if there's not a DIP, that has to be       |    | 25 determined based on the level of              |\n|    |                                                    |    |                                                  |\n|    | Page 70                                            |    | Page 72                                          |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                         | 1  | C. JALBERT                                       |\n|    | 2 reported in the monthly operating report.        |    | 2 disbursements. It's very easy to double        |\n| 3  | You prepared one monthly<br>Q.                     |    | 3 check their work. We would do that and         |\n|    | 4 operating report to date?                        |    | 4 make sure that the number is right. It's       |\n| 5  | A.<br>In this case?                                |    | 5 frequently wrong because sometimes they        |\n| 6  | Q.<br>In this case, is that right?                 |    | 6 issue the bill before the March statement      |\n| 7  | A.<br>Yes.                                         |    | 7 actually hits. So they're estimating.          |\n| 8  | Is another monthly operating<br>Q.                 |    | 8 They're generally off --<br>not their fault -- |\n|    | 9 report in progress?                              |    | 9 in the first quarter because it's not a        |\n| 10 | A.<br>Yes.                                         |    | 10 full quarter. They don't have a basis for     |\n| 11 | Did you also prepare --<br>scratch<br>Q.           |    | 11 making estimates, whatever the case may be    |\n|    | 12 that. Did Verdolino and Lowey also prepare      |    | 12 but we would --<br>we would ensure that the   |\n|    | 13 the estimated monthly operating expenses        |    | 13 fee paid to the U.S. Trustees is              |\n|    | 14 contained in the schedule?                      |    | 14 appropriate under the circumstances.          |\n| 15 | A.<br>To what are you referring to?                | 15 | Q.<br>Turning to the next line item,             |\n| 16 | We can come back to that.<br>Q.                    |    | 16 \"assistance with preparation and/or review    |\n| 17 | A.<br>Okay.                                        |    | 1 7 of estate federal and state income tax       |\n| 18 | Have you or Verdolino and Lowey<br>Q.              |    | 18 filings\". What work has Verdolino and         |\n|    | 19 prepared a quarterly report in this case?       |    | 19 Lowey done in connection with this line       |\n| 20 | A.<br>The United States Trustee                    |    | 20 item?                                         |\n|    | 21 quarterly report?                               | 21 | A.<br>Nothing.                                   |\n| 22 | Yes.<br>Q.                                         | 22 | Q.<br>I think you mentioned before               |\n| 23 | A.<br>No. We don't prepare that,                   |    | 23 that you were going to recommend the filing   |\n|    | 24 they do.                                        |    | 24 of income taxes. Why do you recommend that    |\n| 25 | What is a quarterly report?<br>Q.<br>Page 71       |    | 25 in this case?<br>Page 73                      |\n\n19 (Pages 70 - 73)\n\n| 1 | C. JALBERT                                              |       | C. JALBERT                                        |\n|---|---------------------------------------------------------|-------|---------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | A.<br>I recommend it in every case.                     |       | 2 legally required or not with a 505(b)           |\n|   | 3 So individual estate tax returns,                     |       | 3 letter.                                         |\n|   | 4 individual estates is a separate --                   | 4     | Do you anticipate that multiple<br>Q.             |\n|   | 5 completely separate and distinct entity               |       | 5 returns will be filed in this matter if the     |\n|   | 6 from the individual as opposed to in a                |       | 6 debtor chooses to file returns.                 |\n|   | 7 corporate case, the corporation retains its           | 7     | A.<br>Well, I don't know what the                 |\n|   | 8 tax identity. You continue to file                    |       | 8 debtor is going to do and again, it has no      |\n|   | 9 C-corporation returns if they're a                    |       | 9 bearing on the Estate and no bearing on         |\n|   | 10 C-corporation, S Corp., partnership,                 |       | 10 Verdolino and Lowey but the Estate will        |\n|   | 11 whatever the case may be and their year end          |       | 11 have to file --<br>I'll recommend that it file |\n|   | 12 remains whatever their year end was                  |       | 12 a federal return. The debtor is a resident     |\n|   | 13 established pre-petition. In a bankruptcy            |       | 13 of Connecticut so there would be a             |\n|   | 14 estate, the Estate is separate and distinct          |       | 14 Connecticut estate tax return and if, for      |\n|   | 15 from the individual. The individual has to           |       | 15 some reason, there was income from another     |\n|   | 16 continue to file his own individual income           |       | 16 state, we would file from whatever state       |\n|   | 1 7 taxes with whatever his individual income           |       | 17 that that income came. So I don't know         |\n|   | 18 that doesn't come into the Estate. In a              |       | 18 what it's going to be but it's at least        |\n|   | 19 Chapter 11 case, virtually all of the                |       | 19 going to be Connecticut and the IRS.           |\n|   | 20 debtor's income is supposed to come into             | 20    | Q.<br>I think we covered before, it's             |\n|   | 21 the Estate. So there really shouldn't be a           |       | 21 your understanding that the debtor has no      |\n|   | 22 separate one but technically, there could            |       | 22 income in this case?                           |\n|   | 23 be. The Estate is --<br>the Estate return is         | 23    | A.<br>Correct.                                    |\n|   | 24 generally assigned to be December 31,                | 24    | What work do you anticipate<br>Q.                 |\n|   | 25 unless you elect otherwise. There are                |       | 25 Verdolino and Lowey will do in connection      |\n|   |                                                         |       | Page 76                                           |\n|   | Page 74                                                 |       |                                                   |\n| 1 | C. JALBERT                                              | 1     | C. JALBERT                                        |\n|   | 2 reasons to elect otherwise but the most               |       | 2 with an individual tax return for the           |\n|   | 3 important point is in order to get the --             |       | 3 debtor?                                         |\n|   | 4 the relief that's in the bankruptcy code              | 4     | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                     |\n|   | 5 under Section 505b, in order to get that              | 5     | A.<br>Well, I'd have to guess what's              |\n|   | 6 relief, you have to file a tax return. So             |       | 6 going to take place between February 15 and     |\n|   | 7 I recommend, even when there's no tax due,            |       | 7 December 31. I don't know whether there         |\n|   | 8 that the return gets filed in order to                |       | 8 will be any income or not. There's              |\n|   | 9 protect all --<br>everybody in the case to            |       | 9 litigation going on. There might be             |\n|   | 10 make sure that there is not an issue that            |       | 10 settlements. I don't know whether there'll     |\n|   | 11 gives the various taxing authorities 60              |       | 11 be income or not but ifthere is, there'll      |\n|   | 12 days from the date of filing with the                |       | 12 be income. From what source, I don't know      |\n|   | 13 505(b) letter to elect to audit it. It's             |       | 13 and from where, I don't know but at a          |\n|   | 14 the way that the case can move forward to            |       | 14 minimum, there will be disbursements and in    |\n|   | 15 closure and not have the seven year                  |       | 15 a bankruptcy, there's two types of expenses    |\n|   | 16 statute, three year statutes and the like.           |       | 16 from a tax perspective. There are              |\n|   | 17 So I recommend everyone does the 505(b).             |       | 17 administrative expenses like professional      |\n|   | 18 If they don't elect to audit it in the               |       | 18 fees and there are other types of expenses     |\n|   | 19 first 60 days, then they lose the                    |       | 19 that are normal to an individual. Mortgage     |\n|   | 20 opportunity. If they select it for audit,            |       | 20 interest, real estate taxes, whatever the      |\n|   | 21 then they got another 120 days. I want --            |       | 21 case may be. They are treated in different     |\n|   | 22 I recommend it in every single case,                 |       | 22 ways on the tax return but one of the          |\n|   | 23 individual or corporation or partnership or          |       | 23 reasons why you would file a return is the     |\n|   | 24 LLC, that the tax returns get filed whether          | 24 -- | for tax purposes in a bankruptcy estate,          |\n|   | 25 they're necessary or not, whether they're<br>Page 75 |       | 25 the fees paid to professionals are<br>Page 77  |\n\n20 (Pages 74 - 77)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 deductible and you can build them up like a 3 deferred tax asset. So to the extent, in 4 the future -- after we spend money on the 5 case, if, in the future, there was a large 6 settlement agreement, you would be able to 7 offset the previous administrative NOL's 8 against the future income -- 9 THE COURT REPORTER: The 10 previous administrative -- 11 THE WITNESS: N-O -- net 12 operating losses against a future 13 receipt, which is another reason to 14 file the return. 15 Q. Is it fair to say that the work 16 that Verdolino and Lowey anticipates 17 potentially doing in connection with tax 18 returns depends on whether cash is coming 19 into the debtor or the Estate in the 20 future? 21 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 22 A. No. You're going to have -- 23 you're going to have accrued expenses 24 depending on the -- when the timing of the 25 case and everything, accrued expenses can 1 C. JALBERT 2 be deductible. So cash -- clearly, if 3 there were cash, that would -- that would 4 have to be taken care of but depending on 5 how this case goes and the timing, it's 6 entirely possible that some of the accrued 7 expenses would be deductible. 8 **Q.** Have you seen the debtor's most 9 recent tax returns? 10 A. I don't know that I would be 11 able to call them most recent tax returns 12 but I've seen parts. I don't know if it's 13 the whole thing. I don't know ifl saw the 14 entire federal and the entire state but I 15 -- I at least saw the New York return and 16 the federal version attached to the New 1 7 York return which may or may not be the 18 entire federal return for 2019 I think and 19 2020. 20 **Q.** If the debtor's income is zero, 21 what do you anticipate deducting from? 22 MR. AULET: Objection. 23 A. Are we talking about the debtor 24 individually or the Estate? 25 **Q.** Let's start with the debtor. Page 78 Page 79 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. I have no -- it's not my 3 problem or interest what happens to the 4 debtor, outside of the bankruptcy estate. 5 He's going to have to hire a different 6 accountant to deal with that. 7 **Q.** Let's talk about the Estate. 8 A. If the Estate has tax 9 transactions, as I said, I would recommend 10 the Estate files tax returns on a timely 11 basis and it would include whatever 12 transactional activity that is allowed 13 under the -- both the bankruptcy code and 14 the internal revenue code and I don't know 15 what that's going to be. 16 **Q.** Turning to the next line item, 17 it reads, \"assistance with reviewing 18 reconciling, analyzing and if necessary, 19 objecting to proofs of claim\". What work 20 has Verdolino and Lowey performed in 21 connection with this line item? 22 A. None. 23 **Q.** Just generally, what does -- 24 what is a proof of claim? 25 A. It's a form. There's a form. 1 C. JALBERT Page 80 2 There's a bankruptcy form that's a proof of 3 claim. I don't remember what the form 4 number is but it's an opportunity for any 5 alleged creditor to file a claim in either 6 a Chapter 11 or a Chapter 7 case. They can 7 file claims on a secured basis, a priority 8 basis, an administrative basis and I'm sure 9 there's more that I'm missing. I don't 10 think there's a claims objection deadline 11 but at some point in time, in a Chapter 11, 12 there's usually a claims objection 13 deadline. If, however, a creditor has been 14 scheduled on Schedule D, E or F and that 15 number happens to be right, then the 16 creditor does not have to file a claim as I 1 7 understand it. If they disagree because 18 it's owed more or less -- and rarely do 19 they disagree if they're owed less but if 20 they're owed more, they're allowed to file 21 a proof of claim and establish what they 22 think the amount due to them from the 23 bankruptcy estate would be. 24 Q. Have you reviewed any of the 25 pending litigation claims in this matter? Page 81\n\n21 (Pages 78 - 81)\n\nPAX-014-021\n\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                                                                 | 1   | C. JALBERT                                     |\n|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|------------------------------------------------|\n| 2   | A.<br>No.                                                                                  |     | 2 someone to do work on a preference           |\n|     | What experience does Verdolino                                                             |     | 3 analysis. We certainly participated in       |\n| 3   | Q.                                                                                         |     |                                                |\n|     | 4 and Lowey have in analyzing the likelihood<br>5 of success in pending litigation claims? |     | 4 preparing that because we filed them.        |\n|     |                                                                                            | 5   | Do you know how many<br>Q.                     |\n| 6   | A.<br>Absolutely none.                                                                     |     | 6 pre-petition payments were disclosed in      |\n| 7   | Q.<br>Turning to the next line item,                                                       |     | 7 this case?                                   |\n|     | 8 \"assistance with reviewing debtor books and                                              | 8   | A.<br>No.                                      |\n|     | 9 records for possible avoidable transactions                                              | 9   | Does 21 sound about right?<br>Q.               |\n|     | 10 such as preference and fraudulent transfer                                              | 10  | A.<br>I don't know.                            |\n|     | 11 claims\". Do you see that'J                                                              | 11  | Q.<br>So the line item refers to               |\n| 12  | A.<br>Yes.                                                                                 |     | 12 debtor books and records for possible       |\n| 13  | Can you explain to me,<br>Q.                                                               |     | 13 avoidable transactions. Have you reviewed   |\n|     | 14 generally, what this means?                                                             |     | 14 any debtor books and records in connection  |\n| 15  | A.<br>The bankruptcy code allows a                                                         |     | 15 with this engagement?                       |\n|     | 16 look back period. For preferences, it                                                   | 16  | A.<br>No.                                      |\n|     | 1 7 allows 90 days prior to the filing for                                                 | 1 7 | Has Verdolino and Lowey<br>Q.                  |\n|     | 18 preference claims and I'll let lawyers                                                  |     | 18 reviewed any books and records in           |\n|     | 19 define what that is and insiders and other                                              |     | 19 connection with this engagement?            |\n|     | 20 fraudulent transfers take place between                                                 | 20  | A.<br>No.                                      |\n|     | 21 zero days and I've heard it's --<br>whatever                                            | 21  | Is it fair to say that<br>Q.                   |\n|     | 22 the statute happens to be for whatever the                                              |     | 22 V erdolino and Lowey relies on the          |\n|     | 23 issue might be, one year, two years, four                                               |     | 23 assistance of other parties in connection   |\n|     | 24 years, whatever the case maybe but it's a                                               |     | 24 with this line item?                        |\n|     | 25 search through transactions to see if any<br>Page 82                                    | 25  | MR AULET: Objection to form.<br>Page 84        |\n|     |                                                                                            |     |                                                |\n|     |                                                                                            |     |                                                |\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                                                                 | 1   | C. JALBERT                                     |\n|     | 2 of them might be avoidable and recoverable                                               | 2   | A.<br>Are you talking about past               |\n|     | 3 to the Estate.                                                                           |     | 3 tense or future tense?                       |\n| 4   | Q.<br>What analysis has Verdolino and                                                      | 4   | Q.<br>Past tense.                              |\n|     | 5 Lowey performed in connection with this                                                  | 5   | A.<br>We relied on other individuals           |\n|     | 6 line item?                                                                               |     | 6 for everything that we did from an           |\n| 7   | MR AULET: I would caution the                                                              |     | 7 information perspective.                     |\n| 8   | Witness to the extent that there is                                                        | 8   | MR AULET: We've been going                     |\n| 9   | anything, not to disclose any                                                              | 9   | for awhile so if you need a break --           |\n| 10  | specifics.                                                                                 | 10  | THE WITNESS: No, let's get the                 |\n| 11  | MS. ARONSSON: Sorry, what do                                                               | 11  | --<br>let's do it all at once. I would         |\n| 12  | you mean?                                                                                  | 12  | like to get out of here before                 |\n| 13  | MR AULET: That ifhe has done                                                               | 13  | tonight.                                       |\n| 14  | any work, it would be covered by the                                                       | 14  | MR GOLDMAN: We are going to                    |\n| 15  | work/product privilege. Not to                                                             | 15  | break at 12.                                   |\n| 16  | disclose those specifics.                                                                  | 16  | MR HARBACH: Yes, sir.                          |\n| 1 7 | Setting aside the work/product<br>Q.                                                       | 17  | Q.<br>Okay, turning to the next line           |\n|     | 18 protection that Brown Rudnick is alleging                                               |     | 18 item, \"assistance with any necessary        |\n|     | 19 in connection with this line item, can you                                              |     | 19 litigation support\". I think we covered     |\n|     | 20 answer the question?                                                                    |     | 20 this previously. Do you have anything to    |\n| 21  | Well, one of the questions in<br>A.                                                        |     | 21 add about potential services in connection  |\n|     | 22 the SOF A's is payments made in the 90 days                                             |     | 22 with this line item that we haven't already |\n|     | 23 prior to bankruptcy. I don't know if                                                    |     | 23 discussed?                                  |\n|     | 24 that's necessarily a surprise to anybody                                                | 24  | A.<br>Not that I can remember.                 |\n|     | 25 but that is usually the starting place for<br>Page 83                                   | 25  | Q.<br>Has Verdolino and Lowey done<br>Page 85  |\n\n22 (Pages 82 - 85)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                               | 1  | C. JALBERT                                          |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 any work in connection with this line item             |    | 2 assets is on liquidated litigation claims?        |\n|    | 3 to this date?                                          | 3  | MR AULET: Objection to form.                        |\n| 4  | A.<br>In this case, no.                                  | 4  | Ifwe did, it would be awfully<br>A.                 |\n| 5  | Q.<br>The next --<br>turning to the next                 | 5  | small.                                              |\n|    | 6 line item is \"assistance with plan                     | 6  | Understood. Are you aware of<br>Q.                  |\n|    | 7 development and preparation including                  |    | 7 any draft plans currently being circulated?       |\n|    | 8 feasibility\". What does this mean?                     | 8  | MR AULET: Objection. He's                           |\n| 9  | A.<br>Well, in order to have a                           | 9  | already testified that he hasn't                    |\n|    | 10 successful Chapter 11, you have to confirm            | 10 | performed any work on this. So I                    |\n|    | 11 a plan of reorganization or whatever the              | 11 | don't see what the relevance is to                  |\n|    | 12 title will be when it's prepared and                  | 12 | V &L's retention.                                   |\n|    | 13 created. It might even be a joint plan for            | 13 | MS. ARONSSON: Sure. I'm                             |\n|    | 14 all I know. In those plans, there                     | 14 | curious though about ongoing work in                |\n|    | 15 typically is some budgeting because                   | 15 | connection with this line item.                     |\n|    | 16 sometimes payments to creditors are paid              | 16 | MR A ULET: He can answer if                         |\n|    | 1 7 out over time. We might assist in                    | 17 | he's doing any current work with it.                |\n|    | 18 preparing the cash flow projections of                | 18 | A.<br>None.                                         |\n|    | 19 receipts and disbursements for some future            | 19 | Turning to --<br>turning to the<br>Q.               |\n|    | 20 time period and my --<br>I'm not a lawyer but         |    | 20 next line item on the next page, it reads,       |\n|    | 21 as I understand it, in order to confirm a             |    | 21 \"general consulting and assistance with any      |\n|    | 22 Chapter 11, you must prove that the                   |    | 22 other matters and tasks that may arise and       |\n|    | 23 creditors are getting a better return from            |    | 23 as may be directed by you or the debtor\".        |\n|    | 24 the Chapter 11 plan than they would have in           |    | 24 Is it fair to say this is kind of a              |\n|    | 25 a Chapter 7 case and that usually requires            |    | 25 catch-all?                                       |\n|    | Page 86                                                  |    | Page 88                                             |\n|    |                                                          |    |                                                     |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                               | 1  | C. JALBERT                                          |\n|    | 2 that you --<br>well, you're going to have              | 2  | A.<br>Yes. It's a catch-all with the                |\n|    | 3 feasibility and you're going to have --                |    | 3 caveat --<br>this is not my first rodeo --<br>if, |\n|    | 4 what's the other one --<br>term is slipping my         |    | 4 for some reason, there's a discreet task          |\n|    | 5 mind --<br>I can't remember it but it didn't           |    | 5 that is going to be required that will be         |\n|    | 6 list it anyway's.                                      |    | 6 comprehensive and costly, we would file a         |\n| 7  | The line item says feasibility<br>Q.                     |    | 7 motion to amend our employment, what would        |\n|    | 8 and I think you mentioned that as well.                |    | 8 be covered by the employment but as to --         |\n|    | 9 What does feasibility mean?                            |    | 9 you know, for instance, sometimes they get        |\n| 10 | A.<br>You --<br>the projections is                       |    | 10 a notice from the IRS that requires 15           |\n|    | 11 usually the evidence with which to allow              |    | 11 minutes for someone to respond to. I know        |\n|    | 12 the Court and other parties in interest to            |    | 12 little --<br>little cats and dogs that happen    |\n|    | 13 determine what the future cash flows will             |    | 13 that don't happen to fit into something          |\n|    | 14 be and make their own decision based on               |    | 14 else, it's a catch-all for the minutiae.         |\n|    | 15 that as to whether the debtor's plan is               |    | 15 Not intended to be a catch-all for major         |\n|    | 16 financially feasible and the Judge                    |    | 16 line items and that's only to protect me.        |\n|    | 17 obviously has the final determination but             | 17 | Q.<br>Understood. What work or                      |\n|    | 18 usually everyone puts their two cents in.             |    | 18 analysis has Verdolino performed in              |\n| 19 | What analysis has Verdolino and<br>Q.                    |    | 19 connection with this line item, if any?          |\n|    | 20 Lowey done to date in connection with this            | 20 | A.<br>None that I know of.                          |\n|    | 21 line item?                                            | 21 | Are you familiar with a company<br>Q.               |\n| 22 | A.<br>None.                                              |    | 22 called Stretto?                                  |\n| 23 | Would Verdolino and Lowey have<br>Q.                     | 23 | A.<br>Yes.                                          |\n|    | 24 a function in developing a plan if the                | 24 | Q.<br>What do they do?                              |\n|    | 25 debtor's estate's only source of income or<br>Page 87 | 25 | A.<br>I don't know everything that<br>Page 89       |\n\n23 (Pages 86 - 89)\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\nPAX-014-023\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                 | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 they do but they do claims agent work and                                | 2        | MR AULET: Objection to form.                              |\n|    | 3 other bankruptcy-related work. I don't                                   | 3        | A.<br>Yes.                                                |\n|    | 4 know what their list of services are. I've                               | 4        | You mentioned before that you<br>Q.                       |\n|    | 5 hired them myself in cases. I think                                      |          | 5 have worked with Stretto in the past?                   |\n|    | 6 they're still working for me on a case or                                | 6        | A.<br>Well, they're in the same --                        |\n|    | 7 two right now in a limited basis.                                        |          | 7 some of the same --<br>well, a couple. One or           |\n| 8  | Are you aware that Stretto was<br>Q.                                       |          | 8 two of the same cases that we're in.                    |\n|    | 9 involved in this matter?                                                 | 9        | Do you have an understanding as<br>Q.                     |\n| 10 | A.<br>I'm aware that there's a motion                                      |          | 10 to whether Stretto could open and maintain             |\n|    | 11 to employ them, yes.                                                    |          | 11 a DIP account?                                         |\n| 12 | Generally, what is your<br>Q.                                              | 12       | A.<br>No.                                                 |\n|    | 13 understanding of the scope of work that                                 | 13       | Do you have an understanding<br>Q.                        |\n|    | 14 Stretto would potentially be employed to                                |          | 14 about whether Stretto could monitor                    |\n|    | 15 do?                                                                     |          | 15 disbursements in connection with a DIP                 |\n|    |                                                                            |          |                                                           |\n| 16 | I have not read their motion to<br>A.                                      |          | 16 account?                                               |\n|    | 17 employ. No idea what their --                                           | 17       | A.<br>No.                                                 |\n| 18 | MS. ARONSSON: Let's go off the                                             | 18       | Turning to the books and<br>Q.                            |\n| 19 | record. Thank you.                                                         |          | 19 records line item, the seventh bullet                  |\n| 20 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                                              |          | 20 point, I'm going to ask you to assume that             |\n| 21 | 11:53 a.m. and we are off the record.                                      |          | 21 there are 21 professional service providers            |\n| 22 | (Whereupon, a brief recess was                                             |          | 22 who have received a pre-petition payment in            |\n| 23 | taken.)                                                                    |          | 23 the 90 days before filing. I'm also going              |\n| 24 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time                                                 |          | 24 to ask you to assume that Stretto can                  |\n| 25 | period is 12:22 p.m. We're back on                                         |          | 25 provide analysis with respect to those<br>Page 92      |\n|    |                                                                            |          |                                                           |\n|    | Page 90                                                                    |          |                                                           |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                 |          | C. JALBERT                                                |\n| 2  | the record.                                                                |          | 2 payments. Why is it necessary for                       |\n| 3  | Just wrapping up the questions<br>Q.                                       |          | 3 Verdolino and Lowey to perform these                    |\n|    | 4 related to Exhibit 4. Turning back to the                                |          | 4 duties?                                                 |\n|    | 5 line item about opening and maintaining the                              | 5        | MR AULET: Objection to form.                              |\n|    | 6 DIP account, would you agree that a bank or                              | 6        | It calls for speculation.                                 |\n|    |                                                                            |          | A.                                                        |\n|    | 7 an escrow agent could open and maintain a                                | 7        | Most everybody that has half a                            |\n|    | 8 DIP account?                                                             |          | 8 brain can do that. It's not going to be                 |\n| 9  | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                               |          | 9 done by me.                                             |\n| 10 | I don't have any knowledge of<br>A.                                        | 10       | MS. ARONSSON: The Court                                   |\n|    | 11 why they couldn't but I'm certainly not an                              | 11       | Reporter is going to hand you what is                     |\n|    | 12 expert.                                                                 | 12       | being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 5.                        |\n| 13 | What about monitoring<br>Q.                                                | 13       | (Whereupon, Official Form                                 |\n|    | 14 disbursements and effectuating                                          | 14       | 106Sum was marked as Jalbert Exhibit                      |\n|    | 15 disbursements?                                                          | 15       | 5 for identification as of this date                      |\n| 16 | The bank doing it?<br>A.                                                   | 16       | by the Reporter.)                                         |\n| 17 | Yes.<br>Q.                                                                 | 17       | MS. ARONSSON: I'll say forthe                             |\n| 18 | A.<br>I don't think the bank's going                                       | 18       | record, this is a document that has                       |\n|    | 19 to do it.                                                               | 19       | been filed as Docket Number 78 in                         |\n| 20 | Or an escrow agent.<br>Q.                                                  | 20       | this case.                                                |\n| 21 | A.<br>An escrow agent would have more                                      | 21       | Do you recognize this document,<br>Q.                     |\n|    | 22 obligation, whatever the escrow agreement                               |          | 22 Mr. Jalbert?                                           |\n|    | 23 says. I don't --                                                        | 23       | A.<br>Yes.                                                |\n| 24 | But an escrow agent could be<br>Q.<br>25 employed to perform those duties? | 24<br>25 | What is it?<br>Q.<br>A.<br>The first page is the official |\n\n24 (Pages 90 - 93)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 form 106Sum which is the summary of assets 3 and liabilities and certain statistical 4 information for the debtor, Ho Wan Kwok. 5 Q. I think we've discussed earlier 6 that Verdolino and Lowey had a role in 7 preparing the SOFA and schedule. Is that 8 right? 9 A. Yes. 10 **Q.** Verdolino and Lowey had a role 11 in preparing this document? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. I just want to walk through 14 this at a high level. The first line item 15 is -- item one relates to property. What 16 does this line item include? 1 7 A. What specific -- A, B or C or 18 all of them? 19 Q. Sorry, fair question. IA. 20 A. Well, it reads \"Schedule A/B 21 Property official form 106A/B\", question or 22 IA, \"copy Line 55. Total real estate from 23 schedule A/B\". 24 Q. Thank you. And it reads zero? 25 A. Correct. Page 94 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. What analysis, if any, did 3 Verdolino and Lowey do to prepare this line 4 item? 5 A. I worked with the lawyers. 6 Q. Did you do any independent 7 investigation with respect to the line item 8 IA? 9 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 10 A. No. 11 Q. Turning to lB, this reads, 12 \"total personal property from Schedule A/B\" 13 and I think this refers us to Line 36? 14 A. I would have thought it related 15 to Line 62. 16 Q. It does and then 62. Sorry -- 1 7 so 62 refers back to 5 6 to 61. Do you see 18 that, that's on Page 7 of the PDF? 19 A. Lines 56 to 61, is that what 20 you're referring to? 21 Q. That's right. 22 A. Yep. 23 Q. The only item populated in 55 24 to 61 is Item 58? 25 A. Correct. Page 95 1 C. JALBERT 2 **Q.** Item 58 refers to Line 36? 3 A. Okay. 4 Q. So 36, just up the page, the 5 total amount here is 3,850 dollars. Do you 6 see that? 7 A. Yes. 8 **Q.** So 36 wraps up into one number. 9 Part 4 of this filing, is that fair? 10 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 11 A. Well, when you mean this 12 filing, are you talking about Part 4 of 13 Schedule A/B. 14 Q. I am, yes. Thank you for the 15 clarification. 16 A. I would agree that Line 36 is 1 7 the sum of Part 4 which starts at question 18 16. 19 Q. What analysis, if any, did 20 Verdolino and Lowey perform in connection 21 with these line items? 22 A. Whatever we did, we did working 23 with the lawyers. 24 Q. I'm going to ask you to tum to 25 Page 3 of the document. Page 96 1 **C. JALBERT**  2 MR. AULET: Just for 3 clarification, every time you're 4 refer to Page 3, you're referring to 5 the top numbers? 6 **MS. ARONSSON:** Yes. I'm 7 referring to the docket numbering at 8 the top. Page 3 of 23. 9 **Q.** Starting with Part 1 here, did 10 Verdolino and Lowey perform any work in 11 connection with this line item? 12 A. Ifwe did, we did with counsel. 13 Q. In Part 2, Item 3 and 4 14 referring to cars, vans, trucks, etcetera, 15 watercraft, aircraft, did Verdolino and 16 Lowey perform any work in connection with 1 7 this section? 18 A. All with counsel. 19 Q. So it's fairto say, when you 20 say you performed work with counsel, you 21 didn't perform any independent 22 investigation? 23 A. Correct. 24 Q. Part 3, Items 6 through Items 25 15 refer to personal and household items, Page 97\n\n25 (Pages 94 - 97)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                       | 1  | C. JALBERT                                     |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 is that right?                                 |    | 2 EXAMINATION BY                               |\n| 3  | A.<br>Yes.                                       |    | 3 MR HARBACH:                                  |\n| 4  | Without walking through each of<br>Q.            | 4  | Q.<br>For the record, this is David            |\n|    | 5 these, did you perform --<br>did Verdolino and |    | 5 Harbach at O'Melveny, also representing      |\n|    | 6 Lowey perform any work in connection with      |    | 6 Pax. I just have a few questions. Sir, I     |\n|    | 7 Items 6 through 14?                            |    | 7 believe you mentioned earlier that you or    |\n| 8  | A.<br>Nothing --<br>not with the                 |    | 8 Verdolino and Lowey were involved in         |\n|    | 9 attorneys.                                     |    | 9 helping to prepare the notes for the         |\n| 10 | Just to be clear about your<br>Q.                |    | 10 schedules that were filed? Have I got that  |\n|    | 11 role, were you provided information from      |    | 11 right?                                      |\n|    | 12 counsel and you were responsible for          | 12 | The specific part of the<br>A.                 |\n|    | 13 drafting this form or did you rely on         |    | 13 notes --                                    |\n|    | 14 counsel to draft this form?                   | 14 | Q.<br>Yes, sir. The specific notes.            |\n| 15 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                     | 15 | Not the general --<br>A.                       |\n| 16 | A.<br>We keypunched into the forms               | 16 | Understood.<br>Q.                              |\n|    | 17 after consultation obviously.                 | 17 | A.<br>Yes, I worked with counsel on            |\n| 18 | Q.<br>Did you do anything besides                |    | 18 that.                                       |\n|    | 19 keypunch into the form?                       | 19 | The specific notes are --<br>Q.                |\n| 20 | A.<br>We discussed matters with the              |    | 20 appear at Document Number 77 on the docket  |\n|    | 21 attorneys.                                    |    | 21 and I don't have an extra copy for you but  |\n| 22 | Q.<br>I'm asking in connection with              |    | 22 I hope you'll agree that it won't be        |\n|    | 23 filing the schedule and the SOFA, when you    |    | 23 necessary. When it comes to questions       |\n|    | 24 say you communicated with the attorneys,      |    | 24 about things like electronics and household |\n|    | 25 you're talking about Brown Rudnick?           |    | 25 goods and furnishings, which my colleague   |\n|    | Page 98                                          |    | Page 100                                       |\n|    |                                                  |    |                                                |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                       |    | C. JALBERT                                     |\n| 2  | A.<br>And Melissa Francis and Aaron              |    | 2 was just asking you about, the specific      |\n|    | 3 Mitchell.                                      |    | 3 notes state, for example, \"numerous items    |\n| 4  | Did you communicate or did<br>Q.                 |    | 4 fitting the personal and household           |\n|    | 5 Verdolino and Lowey communicate with anyom     |    | 5 definition are located at the residence and  |\n|    | 6 else besides the attorneys at Brown            |    | 6 the apartment\" and then it goes onto say,    |\n|    | 7 Rudnick, Melissa Francis and Aaron             |    | 7 \"except as otherwise set forth herein, the   |\n|    | 8 Mitchell?                                      |    | 8 debtor has no legal title to the contents    |\n| 9  | A.<br>No.                                        |    | 9 of either the residence or the apartment     |\n| 10 | Q.<br>Were you provided any facts or             |    | 10 and no court has made any determination     |\n|    | 11 information from any party when punching in   |    | 11 that the debtor has any other interests in  |\n|    | 12 these line items?                             |    | 12 any such items\". My question for you is     |\n| 13 | A.<br>We were informed by facts, lots            |    | 13 was Verdolino and Lowey at all involved in  |\n|    | 14 ofthem from the attorneys and lots of         |    | 14 making the assessment of whether any of     |\n|    | 15 discussion.                                   |    | 15 these household items belonged to the       |\n| 16 | Q.<br>Was it --<br>scratch that. The             |    | 16 debtor?                                     |\n|    | 17 information you received, was it oral?        | 17 | MR AULET: I just lodge an                      |\n| 18 | A.<br>Some was oral and some was in              | 18 | objection to asking him about a                |\n|    | 19 e-mails, I believe, from counsel.             | 19 | document that you're not showing him.          |\n| 20 | MR HARBACH: Do you mind ifl                      | 20 | You can answer if you can.                     |\n| 21 | ask a couple questions?                          | 21 | A.<br>To be clear, are you asking me           |\n| 22 | MS. ARONSSON: Sure.                              |    | 22 ifl investigated whether the spatulas and   |\n| 23 | MR AULET: I don't have any                       |    | 23 the pots and pans existed and who bought    |\n| 24 | objection.                                       |    | 24 them and how much they were and are they at |\n| 25 | MR HARBACH: Thank you.<br>Page 99                |    | 25 the house?<br>Page 101                      |\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n26 (Pages 98 - 101)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. All I'm asking is whether 3 Verdolino and Lowey had any role in making 4 the judgment call over whether the 5 household items at the residence or the 6 apartment belonged to Mr. Kwok or was that 7 something that was left to the lawyers? 8 MR AULET: Objection to form. 9 A. We did no investigation. I had 10 no personal knowledge not told to me by 11 Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Brown 12 Rudnick about the ownership of those. So 13 it wasn't my decision and I didn't 14 investigate but I certainly was party to 15 the conversations regarding that. 16 Q. During those conversations, if 17 one of those people, a lawyer at Brown 18 Rudnick or Melissa -- whose last name I 19 forget -- 20 A. Francis. 21 **Q.** Francis, thank you. 22 Represented to you that those items do not 23 belong to Mr. Kwok, you just accepted that 24 at face value? 25 A. Correct. Page 102 1 C. JALBERT 2 MR HARBACH: Okay, thank you. 3 Thank you, Laura. 4 CONTINUED EXAMINATION 5 BY MS. ARONSSON: 6 Q. This is Laura Aronsson from 7 O'Melveny. Just turning back to what we 8 were talking about in connection with the 9 schedule. I think David covered this. So 10 when drafting this, how did you decide 11 whether an item like the iPhone referenced 12 in Line Item 7 or the clothes referenced in 13 Line Item 11 or the family dog referenced 14 Item 13 belonged to Kwok as opposed to 15 another person or entity? 16 A. I was informed by either 17 Melissa Francis or Aaron Mitchell or they 18 informed Brown Rudnick and Brown Rudnick 19 informed us. 20 **Q.** Is it fair to say that that 21 chain of events that you just described 22 applies to all of the items identified in 23 this schedule? 24 MR AULET: Objection to form. 25 A. I don't know -- we better go Page 103 1 C. JALBERT 2 item by item if that's what you want to do. 3 I don't know what you're referring to. You 4 know, you got specific lines you're talking 5 about? 6 **Q.** Sure, that's fair. So in 7 connection with any of the assets 8 identified in the schedule as belonging to 9 Mr. Kwok, you solely relied on the chain of 10 events you previously described, Brown 11 Rudnick received information from Melissa 12 Francis and Aaron Mitchell? 13 MR AULET: Objection to form. 14 A. No, that's not whatl said. I 15 said we heard directly from Melissa Francis 16 or Aaron Mitchell or they informed Brown 17 Rudnick and Brown Rudnick told me that 18 they -- what the answer was from them. 19 There was no one way of communicating. It 20 was fluid situation. We had a very short 21 time to do them but it was not one way or 22 the other. It was, as I said, either and 23 many times the e-mails were with all the 24 attorneys on the e-mail or it was a phone 25 call with a lot of parties and I don't 1 C. JALBERT Page 104 2 remember all of the parties but the source 3 of the information was for us, first, Aaron 4 Mitchell and Melissa Francis in no 5 particular order. Now I don't remember who 6 knew more about what than the other or if 7 they passed information onto Brown Rudnick, 8 who then passed it onto us. Obviously, 9 after they did whatever legal analysis they 10 wanted to do. 11 Q. In preparing these documents, 12 did you ask for any information from Brown 13 Rudnick or Aaron Mitchell or Melissa 14 Francis that you were not given? 15 A. I don't remember asking a 16 question they didn't answer but I didn't 17 investigate anything. 18 Q. I want to tum to Page 16 of 19 this document. So at the bottom of the 20 page, to direct your attention there, Part 21 2 reads, \"estimate your ongoing monthly 22 expenses\". Were you involved in drafting 23 this section? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. What was your role -- or Page 105\n\n85\n\n27 (Pages I 02 - I 05)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 scratch that. What was Verdolino and 3 Lowey's role in connection with this 4 section? 5 A. We had discussions with the 6 legal team, which is Brown Rudnick team 7 plus Aaron Mitchell, plus Melissa Francis, 8 probably more than one time, probably 9 orally, probably in e-mail and it was a 10 discussion. 11 Q. Turning to the next page, the 12 estimated monthly operating expenses reads 13 zero. Is that fair? 14 A. Yes. 15 Q. Did you anticipate the debtor's 16 monthly operating expenses to remain zero 1 7 after this point? 18 MR AULET: Objection to form. 19 A. It certainly was discussed with 20 the attorneys. I don't think it's a 21 secret. There was lots of discussion 22 yesterday. So my expectation is yes, as to 23 his expenses, his payment of his expenses 24 is going to remain I think zero. 25 Q. I think you said his -- his 1 C. JALBERT 2 expenses. In your view, what does his 3 expenses cover? 4 A. There's a whole list of them Page 106 5 here. You want to go down them? It looks 6 like about 30 of them. Real estate taxes, 7 property and homeowners and renters' 8 insurance, home maintenance repair and 9 upkeep expenses, home ownership association 10 and condo dues. Don't even know if those 11 are applicable. Electricity, heat and 12 natural gas. Want me to keep going? 13 Q. So we can just agree that Items 14 4 through 21 would include monthly 15 expenses? 16 A. Again, as it relates to him 17 paying them, I would agree. My 18 understanding is they're going to remain 19 zero. 20 Q. So this -- the analysis 21 contained in this document is separate from 22 the monthly operating report, the reports 23 that you, Verdolino, draft in connection 24 with this case? 25 A. Correct, because the monthly Page 107 1 C. JALBERT 2 operating report is a different report and 3 that's a completely different question than 4 what's on here. 5 **Q.** Can you explain to me the 6 difference? 7 A. And I don't remember what 8 question it is, is it like 4 or 5 or 6E or 9 whatever it is, the request is to report 10 the expenses paid by others on the debtor's 11 behalf. That's not what this asks. So in 12 the schedule, we listed some funds and we 13 will, going forward, be listing and 14 reporting, as required by the MOR, the 15 expenses paid by others on behalf of the 16 debtor which is again different from what 1 7 this asks. 18 **Q.** Focusing on what this asks, 19 it's your understanding that the debtor's 20 ongoing monthly expenses is zero? 21 MR AULET: Objection to form. 22 A. The debtor's payment of the **23 ongoing expenses is zero.**  24 **Q.** You did no investigation into 25 whether that is correct? 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. Correct. 3 Q. Turning just to the Excel 4 sheets at the end of this document, 5 starting just broadly, was Verdolino and 6 Lowey involved in preparing these 7 documents? 8 A. Well, we were certainly 9 involved with others, yes. 10 Q. What -- generally, what work Page 108 11 did Verdolino and Lowey do in connection 12 with these documents? 13 A. Reviewed them for 14 reasonableness, assisted in putting them in 15 a form that would normally be seen in a 16 SOFA and schedule. I think some ofthis 1 7 was uploaded into the actual Schedule F 18 because I think Schedule F -- well, maybe 19 it doesn't. I don't know. I don't 20 remember whether this was uploaded or not 21 but it could be. So that -- so it starts 22 with D. So all of these, we worked with 23 the attorneys and that's again, all three, 24 the Brown Rudnick team, Aaron Mitchell and 25 Melissa Francis. Page 109\n\n85\n\n28 (Pages I 06 - I 09)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. I think you said the phrase 3 reviewed for reasonableness. What do you 4 mean by that? 5 A. Well, ifwe had anything to 6 compare information to, we compared it 7 or -- or if we had a question, we asked a 8 question of the lawyers. I don't remember 9 offhand what those were. 10 Q. Can you think generally of any 11 issues that you investigated in connection 12 with preparing these? 13 A. I'm sure on a couple of them, 14 we wanted the make sure that -- that there 15 wasn't a missing digit or an extra digit so 16 I'm sure someone from my team walked 17 through with someone, probably either 18 Melissa or Aaron, just as a double check 19 that it's what -- what the number on the 20 form was the number that they intended. 21 There wasn't, in there someplace, a human 22 error. 23 Q. Can you think of anything else 24 specific that you investigated? 25 A. We did not investigate. Page 110 1 C. JALBERT 2 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 3 Reporter is going to hand you what's 4 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 6. 5 This is a document filed in this case 6 as Docket 77. 7 (Whereupon, Global Notes was 8 marked as Jalbert Exhibit 6 for 9 identification as of this date by the 10 Reporter.) 11 Q. Do you recognize this document? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. What is it? 14 A. The Global Notes and Statements 15 of Limitations Methodology and Disclaimers 16 Regarding the Debtor's Schedules of Assets 17 and Liabilities and Statement of Financial 18 Affairs and the debtor is Ho Wan Kwok. 19 **Q.** And this is a specific line 20 item that Verdolino and Lowey's proposed 21 retention relates to? 22 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 23 A. Can I go back and take a look? 24 I don't know what the global notes are 25 listed or not but these are part and parcel Page 111 C. JALBERT 2 to the **SOF** A's and schedules. So it would 3 be part of the first bullet, \"assistance 4 with preparation of the statement of 5 financial affairs and schedules and all 6 support thereto and any amendments, if 7 necessary\". 8 Q. What was Verdolino and Lowey's 9 role in preparing this document? 10 A. Well, we certainly assisted in 11 drafting. We assisted in reviewing, 12 particularly the specific notes but there 13 was -- there was a lot of back and forth 14 and a lot of work between the Brown Rudnick 15 law firm, Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis 16 and Verdolino and Lowey, both -- all three 17 at Verdolino and Lowey, Matt Flynn, Mary Jo 18 Schindler and myself. 19 **Q.** Just to understand, what 20 specific work did Verdolino and Lowey do in 21 connection with preparing this document? 22 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 23 A. Well, like I said, we had 24 numerous e-mails, we reviewed everything, 25 we made comments. We might have drafted a Page 112 1 C. JALBERT 2 paragraph here or a paragraph there. I 3 think we assisted the group in making sure 4 the references, amongst the notes and 5 amongst the questions and the SOFA's and 6 amongst the schedules to the extent they 7 were interrelated, that the references were 8 appropriate. We made sure that the 9 writings were the facts as we knew them. 10 Didn't investigate but we had lots of 11 discussions and we made sure that what was 12 represented here was our memories. 13 Q. Thank you. Turning to Page 4, 14 Question 1 in the middle ofthe page, asks 15 \"do you own or have any legal or equitable 16 interest in any residence, building, land 17 or similar property\". The answer in Item 18 1, below it, reads, \"the debtor has use and 19 occupancy ofreal estate located at 373 20 Taconic Road, Greenwich, Connecticut\". Do 21 you have any understanding as to why the 22 use and occupancy of certain real estate is 23 relevant to this filing? 24 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 25 A. Well, I'm not a lawyer but Page 113\n\n85\n\n29 (Pages 110 - 113)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                               |     | C. JALBERT                                           |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------|-----|------------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 Schedule A is I thought real property that             |     | 2 Haven on Wednesday for the 341 meeting but         |\n|    | 3 was owned by the debtor. I would have to               |     | 3 I don't know --<br>I know it's a valuable car.     |\n|    | 4 go back and confirm that but real estate.              |     | 4 I don't know what the name is and I don't          |\n|    | 5 So it would be --<br>he's alive. He resides            |     | 5 know who owns them. I know the debtor --           |\n|    | 6 in a residence and I'm presuming this is               |     | 6 just as this says, the debtor has use.             |\n|    | 7 the appropriate legal description of the               | 7   | So beyond what this says here<br>Q.                  |\n|    | 8 facts and circumstances of his living in               |     | 8 and your previous answer, do you have              |\n|    | 9 that residence.                                        |     | 9 anymore information about the vehicles that        |\n| 10 | Q.<br>Again, no independent                              |     | 10 the debtor has use of?                            |\n|    | 11 investigations into this?                             | 11  | A.<br>No.                                            |\n| 12 | A.<br>Correct.                                           | 12  | Q.<br>Did you witness the debtor                     |\n| 13 | Q.<br>Did you perform any evaluation                     |     | 13 using any luxury vehicles at any time?            |\n|    | 14 of the residences listed in Question 1?               | 14  | A.<br>I don't know what you mean by                  |\n| 15 | A.<br>No.                                                |     | 15 using but he got out of one in New Haven on       |\n| 16 | Q.<br>The second bullet refers to an                     |     | 16 Wednesday.                                        |\n|    | 17 apartment in the Sherry Netherland Hotel?             | 1 7 | Do you know what kind of car it<br>Q.                |\n| 18 | A.<br>Yes.                                               |     | 18 was?                                              |\n| 19 | Q.<br>Did you draft this section?                        | 19  | A.<br>I don't remember.                              |\n| 20 | A.<br>Did I draft it? I doubt it. I                      | 20  | Is this --<br>strike that. Is --<br>Q.               |\n|    | 21 might have reviewed it. I might have had              |     | 21 is the answer to Question 3 relevant to the       |\n|    | 22 input in something but this is not my                 |     | 22 preparation of monthly operating reports?         |\n|    | 23 language.                                             | 23  | A.<br>Probably, yes.                                 |\n| 24 | Q.<br>Are you aware that the entity                      | 24  | Why?<br>Q.                                           |\n|    | 25 holding the legal title to the Sherry                 | 25  | A.<br>Because I imagine there's a                    |\n|    | Page 114                                                 |     | Page 116                                             |\n|    |                                                          |     |                                                      |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                               | 1   | C. JALBERT                                           |\n|    | 2 Netherland apartment is in bankruptcy?                 |     | 2 cost associated with those vehicles being          |\n| 3  | A.<br>Well, I know there's a Chapter                     |     | 3 provided for his use and again, I don't            |\n|    | 4 11 going on. Exactly what's in Chapter 11              |     | 4 remember exactly what the question is, 4, 5        |\n|    | 5 and who owns what, I have not confirmed or             |     | 5 or 6, like E, where the rules say to report        |\n|    | 6 made an investigation but generally                    |     | 6 expenses made by third-parties on behalf of        |\n|    | 7 speaking, I understand that that apartment             |     | 7 the debtor. Well, I'm thinking the use of          |\n|    | 8 is somehow in Chapter 11 in New York.                  |     | you know, I don't know if<br>8 the vehicles --       |\n| 9  | Any involvement in those<br>Q.                           |     | 9 there's a car payment on it, gasoline,             |\n|    | 10 proceedings in New York?                              |     | 10 insurance, I don't know but something might       |\n| 11 | A.<br>No.                                                |     | 11 be in there.                                      |\n| 12 | Q.<br>Turning to the next page,                          | 12  | What about the purchase of the<br>Q.                 |\n|    | 13 Question 3 asks for interests, broadly                |     | 13 vehicle itself whenever it was purchased,         |\n|    | 14 speaking, in any vehicles. The response               |     | 14 is that relevant to the monthly operating         |\n|    | 15 reads that \"the debtor has use of                     |     | 15 report?                                           |\n|    | 16 automobiles including luxury automobiles              | 16  | A.<br>Well, monthly operating reports                |\n|    | 17 and motorcycles\". Did you do any                      |     | 17 are usually a disbursement in a particular        |\n|    | 18 investigation into this analysis?                     |     | 18 time period. I imagine if they've bought          |\n| 19 | A.<br>No.                                                |     | 19 one of those cars during the pendency,            |\n| 20 | Q.<br>Do you have any understanding                      |     | 20 maybe it shows up. I don't know. On the           |\n|    | 21 of what vehicles the debtor uses?                     |     | 21 other hand, you could make an argument that       |\n| 22 | A.<br>Only from my memory, the --<br>he                  |     | 22 the use of the vehicle is not the same            |\n|    | 23 has access to a luxury vehicle and I think            |     | 23 thing as buying the vehicle because maybe         |\n|    | 24 there's a vehicle that his security travels           |     | 24 other people use it too. So you would have        |\n|    | 25 in. As a matter of fact, they were in New<br>Page 115 |     | 25 to find a way of allocating the cost.<br>Page 117 |\n\n30 (Pages 114 - 117)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                        | 1  | C. JALBERT                                               |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------|----|----------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | Does that answer apply to the<br>Q.               | 2  | A.<br>No.                                                |\n|    | 3 Question 1 about residences as well?            | 3  | Q.<br>Turning to Page 8, Question 26                     |\n| 4  | MR AULET: Objection to form.                      |    | 4 asks for patents, copyrights, trademarks,              |\n| 5  | A.<br>The debtor resides in a                     |    | 5 etcetera. The answer refers to                         |\n|    | 6 particular residence. They're --<br>the only    |    | 6 unregistered copyrights and other                      |\n|    | 7 people there that I know of, except for a       |    | 7 intellectual property interest in music and            |\n|    | 8 maid that comes in and security and             |    | 8 videos posted to various platforms. What               |\n|    | 9 possibly visits from family. So I imagine       |    | 9 is this referring to?                                  |\n|    | 10 the cost of the residence would be on that     | 10 | A.<br>The whole thing?                                   |\n|    | 11 so --<br>that monthly operating report in some | 11 | Q.<br>Yes.                                               |\n|    | 12 amount and I think I --<br>I was a proponent   | 12 | A.<br>The Question 26 refers to                          |\n|    | 13 of50 percent of that cost would be on          |    | 13 various intellectual property patents,                |\n|    | 14 behalf of the debtor because the spouse        |    | 14 copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and             |\n|    | 15 lives there too and I didn't count the kids    |    | 15 intellectual property. The debtor --<br>I'll          |\n|    | 16 because they only came to visit the debtor.    |    | 16 just read it to you. \"The debtor has                  |\n|    | 17 So I kind of ascribed more to the mother       |    | 17 possible unregistered copyrights and other            |\n|    | 18 and father and split the cost but there's      |    | 18 intellectual property interest in music and           |\n|    | 19 no home purchase in there. There's no --       |    | 19 videos posted to various digital and media            |\n|    | 20 again, it's what you pay in that current       |    | 20 platforms such as YouTube, GTV, Twitter\"              |\n|    | 21 month. So I'm assuming they're telling --      |    | 21 and --<br>I don't even know, GETTR, whatever          |\n|    | 22 we're going to be disclosing what is paid      |    | 22 that is. \"The debtor ascribes no value to             |\n|    | 23 in that particular time frame on behalf of     |    | 23 his social media assets and has made no               |\n|    | 24 the debtor on the various categories, the      |    | 24 attempts to monetize his social media                 |\n|    | 25 vehicles, the security, the home --            |    | 25 presence\".                                            |\n|    |                                                   |    |                                                          |\n|    |                                                   |    |                                                          |\n|    | Page 118                                          |    | Page 120                                                 |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                        | 1  | C. JALBERT                                               |\n| 2  | Q.<br>Thank you --                                | 2  | Beyond what's written on the<br>Q.                       |\n| 3  | A.<br>Food.                                       |    | 3 page, do you have any understanding of what            |\n| 4  | Q.<br>Thank you. Question 4 refers                |    | 4 this refers to?                                        |\n|    | 5 to watercraft, aircraft, motor homes and        | 5  | A.<br>No.                                                |\n|    | 6 the answer references previous access to        | 6  | The second sentence notes that<br>Q.                     |\n|    | 7 the use of a yacht named the Lady May. Do       |    | 7 the debtor ascribes no value to these                  |\n|    | 8 you have any --<br>beyond what's written on     |    | 8 items, do you see that?                                |\n|    | 9 this page, do you have any understanding of     | 9  | A.<br>Yep.                                               |\n|    | 10 Mr. Kwok's interest the Lady May?              | 10 | You performed no valuation of<br>Q.                      |\n| 11 | A.<br>Nothing that's not printed on               |    | 11 these items in connection with your work?             |\n|    | 12 this page.                                     | 12 | A.<br>Correct.                                           |\n| 13 | Did you do any independent<br>Q.                  | 13 | Do you know if any valuation<br>Q.                       |\n|    | 14 investigation into this?                       |    | 14 was performed?                                        |\n| 15 | A.<br>No.                                         | 15 | None to my knowledge.<br>A.                              |\n| 16 | Items 6 and 7, household goods<br>Q.              | 16 | Question 31 asks for interest<br>Q.                      |\n|    | 17 and electronics. I think we covered that       |    | 17 and insurance policies. The answer refers             |\n|    | 18 previously. In connection with Items 6,        |    | 18 to his spouse's health insurance policy               |\n|    | 19 household goods through Questions 17 on        |    | 19 which has no cash value. Do you see that?             |\n|    | 20 this page --<br>so just for clarity, it's      | 20 | A.<br>Yes.                                               |\n|    | 21 Questions 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 17. Did you do       | 21 | Is it standard practice that a<br>Q.                     |\n|    | 22 any investigation as to what --<br>as to       |    | 22 health insurance policy has no cash value?            |\n|    | 23 whether the items referenced in here belong    | 23 | A.<br>I've never seen a situation                        |\n|    | 24 to Mr. Kwok versus some other third-party      |    | 24 where a health insurance policy has a cash            |\n|    | 25 or entity?<br>Page 119                         |    | 25 value except for to the beneficiary of --<br>Page 121 |\n\n31 (Pages 118 - 121)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 if you have a health insurance plan, it has 3 a lot of value to you when you go to the 4 hospital and it pays the bills for you. 5 There's not an independent value to a 6 third-party that you can sell. 7 Q. Do you have any knowledge about 8 the health insurance policy that the debtor 9 has currently? 10 A. No. 11 Q. Question 53 asks for property 12 of the kind not listed and the answer 13 refers to his membership at Mar-a-Lago Club 14 in Palm Beach. Is this the type of thing 15 that Verdolino and Lowey would include on a 16 monthly operating report if Mr. Kwok, the 17 debtor, used the membership? 18 MR AULET: Objection to form. 19 A. I would have to use conjecture. 20 Q. Go ahead. 21 A. Well, the first monthly 22 operating report was filed in February. I 23 don't know whether he went down there or 24 not. I don't know ifhe went down there in 25 March. Ifhe -- ifhe wentthere, I Page 122 1 C. JALBERT 2 imagine there would be travel expenses. I 3 don't know whether there would be a fee for 4 the golf and maybe he had lunch. So I 5 imagine ifhe physically went there and 6 used it, there would be -- there might be 7 -- there would be something in the monthly 8 operating report but if he stays where I 9 think he's going to stay, in Greenwich 10 where he's safe, it's not going to be 11 relevant. 12 Q. What is your basis for thinking 13 he's going to stay where he is in 14 Greenwich? 15 A. I listened to the 341 meeting 16 yesterday -- excuse me, Wednesday. 17 Q. Besides the knowledge gathered 18 from that hearing on Wednesday, the 341 19 hearing, do you have any independent 20 knowledge about the debtor's expected 21 travel or location? 22 A. I have no knowledge whatsoever 23 of where he's going to be at any point in 24 time. 25 Q. Would you rely on Brown Page 123 1 C. JALBERT 2 Rudnick, Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis 3 to inform you of how he might benefit from 4 things like his like his Mar-a-Lago 5 membership in connection with drafting the 6 monthly operating report? 7 A. I certainly would listen to 8 counsel on that for sure. 9 Q. But Verdolino and Lowey 10 wouldn't endeavor to seek out information 11 about these monthly expenses -- 12 A. Well, we're going to seek out 13 and we're going to point to the question 14 and we're going to ask for information 15 that's responsive to that. I don't have 16 access to the information. We don't 1 7 investigate. I'm not going to keep track 18 of where the debtor goes or doesn't go. So 19 someone would need to tell us the 20 information. We would then review it but 21 I -- I think that Mar-a-Lago thing, at 22 least for the foreseeable future, is not an 23 issue but if it becomes an issue, someone 24 will tell me. 25 Q. Turning to Page 11, Schedule I, C. JALBERT 2 the second to last sentence here and it's Page 124 3 that \"the debtor plans to amend Form 122B 4 filed on February 15th, 2022 in which 5 debtor erroneously claimed monthly income 6 of\\$19,488\". Do you see that? 7 A. Yes. 8 **Q.** Do you know what that refers 9 to? 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. What is it? 12 A. The debtor inadvertently or 13 accidently -- I don't know what the term 14 would be -- erroneously filed a Form 122B. 15 It included \\$19,488 dollars which met -- 16 the form met for the monthly income, I 17 think the review by the lawyers was that's 18 incorrect and so they -- the debtor filed 19 an amended 122B or at least intended to -- 20 I don't know if it's done yet or not -- 21 excluding that income. 22 **Q. Did** Verdolino and Lowey perform 23 any work in connection with that erroneous 24 inclusion? 25 A. I'm sure anything we did was in Page 125\n\n85\n\n32 (Pages 122 - 125)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 consultation with the lawyers. 3 MR AULET: Objection to form. 4 Sorry. 5 Q. Turning to Page 13, Question 16 6 refers to a retainer of 500 thousand for 7 Brown Rudnick and then refers to one 8 million dollars from Lamp Capital. Do you 9 have any knowledge of that transaction 10 outside of what's written on the page? 11 A. I think there was discussion of 12 it yesterday -- excuse me, on Wednesday at 13 the 341 meeting and I think I saw a draft 14 of Brown Rudnick's retention papers -- I 15 think I did where I thought something was 16 mentioned in there. 17 Q. Do you recall what that was? 18 A. No. Something along the lines 19 of what's right here. 20 Q. Do you know what Lamp Capital 21 LLC is? 22 A. An entity owned by someone that 23 is not the debtor. 24 Q. Do you have any idea who it is 25 owned by? Page 126 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. Only a guess. 3 Q. Can you tell me -- I guess you 4 don't need to speculate. Do you have any 5 information that -- about what informs your 6 guess? 7 MR AULET: Objection to form. 8 A. My memory was there was a lot 9 being talked about but my memory was 10 something was said during the 341 meeting 11 but it is very -- I was very back of the 12 room, as you know, and it was very hard for 13 me to hear the English version from the 14 interpreter. So I can't be sure but I 15 thought I heard something that discussed 16 who owned Lamp. 1 7 Q. Outside of what you heard at 18 the 341 hearing and this other document 19 that you remember seeing, do you have any 20 knowledge about Lamp or its operations? 21 A. No. 22 Q. The next item, Question 18 23 refers to a litigation funding agreement 24 dated November 8th, 2021. Have you seen 25 that agreement? Page 127 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. There are actually five of them 3 I think. They're listed in Schedule D. I 4 don't recall whether I actually saw them or 5 not. I think they were briefly described 6 to me at a minimum by lawyers. 7 **Q.** Any independent knowledge of 8 those agreements besides -- 9 A. No. 10 Q. Did Verdolino and Lowey do any 11 other investigation in connection with the 12 assets we've talked about that we didn't 13 cover? 14 A. No. 15 Q. Those five litigation 16 agreements we talked about -- 1 7 A. The litigation funding 18 agreements? 19 **Q.** Yes. Thank you. Have you seen 20 them before? 21 A. Nottomyknowledge. 22 **MS. ARONSSON:** The Court 23 Reporter is going to hand you what's 24 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 7. 25 This is a document produced in this Page 128 1 C. JALBERT 2 matter with the Bates stamp Kwok 3 00001752. 4 MR AULET: Just for the 5 record, it's two separate documents 6 so we should make sure -- 7 MS. ARONSSON: I'll represent 8 that this is a family of documents, 9 an e-mail and an attachment. 10 (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was 11 marked as Jalbert Exhibit 7 for 12 identification as of this date by the 13 Reporter.) 14 Q. Mr. Jalbert, I understand 15 you're not on this e-mail. I'm just going 16 to ask you some basic questions about it. 1 7 This is an e-mail between a redacted 18 person, Aaron Mitchell, Matt Flynn and 19 Melissa Francis. Matt Flynn is your 20 colleague. We've talked about the other 21 folks. The attachment is a summary of 22 living expenses from the period February 23 15th to 28th. First, I'm going to ask who 24 is this e-mail from? 25 MR AULET: And I will object Page 129\n\n> Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n33 (Pages 126 - 129)\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                       | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2        | and direct him the Witness to answer                             | 2  | Is this the monthly operating<br>Q.                                                       |\n| 3        | for the same reasons that we                                     |    | 3 report filing that we've been discussing                                                |\n| 4        | discussed previously on the record.                              |    | 4 that you've been involved in preparing?                                                 |\n| 5        | MS. ARONSSON: And we'll                                          | 5  | A.<br>Looks like it, yes.                                                                 |\n| 6        | continue to dispute the redaction                                | 6  | Turning to the filing 120-1,<br>Q.                                                        |\n| 7        | here.                                                            |    | 7 the separate loose page, these line items                                               |\n| 8        | Q.<br>Turning to the attachment, this                            |    | 8 here, can you just explain broadly what                                                 |\n|          | 9 summary of expenses, this was provided by a                    |    | 9 they are at the bottom? What does the                                                   |\n|          | 10 person --<br>the unknown person in the top                    |    | 10 total reflect?                                                                         |\n|          | 11 e-mail, is that right?                                        | 11 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                                              |\n| 12       | A.<br>Yes.                                                       | 12 | A.<br>You're referring to the                                                             |\n| 13       | Is it fair to say that this is<br>Q.                             |    | 13 \\$109,827.12?                                                                          |\n|          | 14 the starting point for Verdolino's monthly                    | 14 | Q.<br>Yes.                                                                                |\n|          | 15 operating report draft?                                       | 15 | A.<br>I'm trying to see who made the                                                      |\n| 16       | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                     |    | 16 payments but inadvertently, the family, on                                             |\n| 1 7      | A.<br>As to the one particular                                   |    | 17 behalfofthe debtor, on February 16th, the                                              |\n|          | 18 question, yes.                                                |    | 18 day after the filing, made these two                                                   |\n| 19       | Sorry. What do you mean?<br>Q.                                   |    | 19 payments on pre-petition amounts. So this                                              |\n| 20       | A.<br>This answers one question on                               |    | 20 was, in an abundance of caution, in the 161                                            |\n|          | 21 the monthly operating report and again, I                     |    | 21 thousand dollars that was shown on Part 1,                                             |\n|          | 22 don't remember offhand exactly which one                      |    | 22 Number E, this 109 thousand dollars is                                                 |\n|          | 23 it is but something, 4, 5, 6E. The funds                      |    | 23 included in the 161,323. So we were --the                                              |\n|          | 24 paid by third-parties on behalf of the                        |    | 24 lawyers felt it was important to supplement                                            |\n|          | 25 debtor. This is the first pass.                               |    | 25 the monthly operating report with that                                                 |\n|          | Page 130                                                         |    | Page 132                                                                                  |\n|          |                                                                  |    |                                                                                           |\n|          |                                                                  |    |                                                                                           |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                       | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                |\n| 2        | MS. ARONSSON: McKenzie, Tab                                      |    | 2 information that this was really a                                                      |\n| 3        | 19.                                                              |    | 3 pre-petition payment paid post-petition.                                                |\n| 4        | THE WITNESS: Are you done?                                       | 4  | Understood. Thank you. So the<br>Q.                                                       |\n| 5        | MS. ARONSSON: No.                                                |    | 5 total expenses \\$161,323 here, ifwe                                                     |\n| 6        | MR AULET: Should we have the                                     |    | 6 subtract from that, the total inadvertent                                               |\n| 7        | back up marked as a separate exhibit                             |    | 7 payments is \\$109,827. What does that                                                   |\n| 8        | or --                                                            |    | 8 amount reflect?                                                                         |\n| 9        | MS. ARONSSON: I typically mark                                   | 9  | The amount of the payments that<br>A.                                                     |\n| 10       | them as one.                                                     |    | 10 weren't these two payments that were made                                              |\n| 11       | MR AULET: Okay.                                                  |    | 11 in the period from February 15th to                                                    |\n| 12       | THE WITNESS: We'll put them                                      |    | 12 February 28th by third-parties on behalf of                                            |\n| 13       | together again and eliminate the blue                            |    | 13 the debtor.                                                                            |\n| 14       | sheet.                                                           | 14 | Q.<br>Would that be reflected in the                                                      |\n| 15       | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                                     |    | 15 final version of the living expenses sheet                                             |\n| 16       | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 8 for                                  |    | 16 that we looked at on Exhibit Number 7?                                                 |\n| 1 7      | identification as of this date by the                            | 17 | A.<br>Yes.                                                                                |\n| 18       | Reporter.)                                                       | 18 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                                              |\n| 19       | Q.<br>The Court Reporter is going to                             | 19 | Is anything else included in<br>Q.                                                        |\n|          | 20 hand you what's being marked as Jalbert                       |    | 20 that number, to your knowledge?                                                        |\n|          | 21 Exhibit 8.                                                    | 21 | A.<br>Well, inadvertently, yes. We                                                        |\n| 22       | A.<br>Have you given it to her yet?                              |    | 22 found out that whoever created the form on                                             |\n| 23       | MS. ARONSSON: This is a                                          |    | 23 the security total dollars, whatever the                                               |\n| 24<br>25 | document filed in this case as Docket<br>120 and document 120-1. |    | 24 final total dollars were, there was a<br>25 payment made February 10 pre-petition that |\n\n34 (Pages 130 - 133)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 was inadvertently included in the payments 3 from February 15th to 28th. So that will 4 be corrected on the next operating report. 5 **Q.** So included in this operating 6 report is the two inadvertent payments to 7 the law firms identified on Exhibit 8? 8 A. Yes, correct. 9 **Q.** The monthly operating living 10 expenses that we've talked about and then 11 this other payment that you said would be 12 corrected, is that right? 13 A. It's included in the 161. 14 We'll be pulling that out when we do the 15 March -- so the way the form works usually 16 is you have payments paid currently and 1 7 cumulative. We will take that small amount 18 of money out of the cumulative so as to 19 have the correct number going forward. 20 **Q.** So is it fair to say that 21 Verdolino and Lowey's role in connection 22 with these inadvertent payments was to kind 23 of double check the amounts included in the 24 monthly operating report? 25 A. We tried but given the timing Page 134 1 C. JALBERT 2 of when the information became available 3 and when the form had to be filed, there 4 was a miscommunication with the preparer of 5 the schedule that will be rectified. 6 **Q.** Who's the preparer of the 7 schedule? 8 A. I can't tell you. 9 **Q.** What schedule are you referring 10 to, this document here, the monthly 11 operating report, Exhibit 8? 12 A. This thing (indicating). 13 **Q.** So the number 161 here refers 14 to this spreadsheet in Exhibit 7 as 15 reflected with your edits, with Verdolino 16 and Lowey's edits? 17 A. The 161 is the sum of the final 18 number from Exhibit 8 plus the 109. 19 **Q.** What work did Verdolino and 20 Lowey do in connection with getting to the 21 final numbers? 22 A. We worked with counsel and 23 Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis trying 24 to review -- we didn't have details but we 25 were trying to ask questions and make sure Page 135 C. JALBERT 2 that the categories were properly described 3 because this is not nearly final. This -- 4 there were some errors and we also worked 5 with counsel and others in trying to figure 6 out what the percentage of the monies that 7 were paid in Column C multiplied by a 8 distribution percentage to arrive at the 9 total. We worked with the preparer to make 10 sure that the descriptions on the schedule 11 were accurate. We tried to confirm the 12 numbers were accurate. We couldn't get the 13 information in time to be able to do that 14 but then we looked at the distribution 15 percentages using our judgment in working 16 with the lawyers. 17 Q. Looking at this draft, living 18 expense chart in Exhibit 7, there are seven 19 line items. Is that right? 20 A. Yes. 21 **Q.** Is it fair to say that 22 V erdolino and Lowey crosschecked the names 23 of the categories to ensure that they 24 accurately depicted the expenses contained 25 in those line items? 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. We did the best we could, yes. 3 Q. What more information would 4 have been helpful to help you get to that 5 determination? 6 A. If we could have seen what 7 the -- what the actual payees and Page 136 8 disbursements were, it probably would have 9 helped us with the categorization. 10 Q. But you didn't receive that? 11 A. Not -- not at that time, no. 12 **Q.** Is the extent of information 13 you received regarding these line items 14 included in this chart here? 15 A. As of the date that we made 16 available all the -- I'm sure there's an 17 updated version because this doesn't tie to 18 here (indicating) and then we -- long after 19 we produced the information for -- for this 20 deposition, there's been continuing ongoing 21 discussions because we're getting ready to 22 file -- excuse me, the March **MOR** in April. 23 **Q.** We'll tum to the -- what I 24 think is the final version but we talked 25 about the categories, the amount you said Page 137\n\n85\n\n35 (Pages 134 - 137)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 that, at the time of this filing, you did 3 not have information to be able to verify 4 the amounts attributed to each category. 5 Is that right? 6 A. Yes. 7 **Q.** What information would have 8 been helpful for you to cross check those 9 amounts? 10 A. Like I said, the name of the 11 payee, a description of what the service 12 was and the amount of the funds. 13 **Q.** The percentage distribution, 14 what does that mean? 15 A. The -- so for instance, 16 security was, in this sheet, \\$43,655.44. 1 7 The drafter of this and anyone that he 18 consulted with or she consulted with was 40 19 percent. Amongst talking with our team and 20 with the lawyer team, we thought that that 21 probably should be one hundred percent 22 because the only reason -- the security is 23 entirely related to Mr. Kwok and his 24 safety. There wouldn't be security if the 25 wife and the kids or others at the 1 C. JALBERT Page 138 2 compound, if it weren't for Mr. Kwok. So 3 we proposed changing and I think that did 4 get changed to a hundred percent. 5 Q. In revising these percentage 6 distributions, did you rely entirely on 7 information received from Brown Rudnick and 8 Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis and this 9 undisclosed person? 10 A. The first pass was the 11 undisclosed person. After we got this 12 information from the undisclosed person, 13 most of the discussion was between our 14 firm, my firm and the lawyer -- lawyers. 15 How long is this is going to go? Because 16 if it's going to go a bit, now I would like 17 to use the restroom. I'll be fast. 18 MS. ARONSSON: We can take a 19 break. We'll go off the record. 20 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 21 1:22 p.m. We're off the record. 22 (Whereupon, a short recess was 23 taken and upon resuming, E-mail Chain 24 was marked as Jalbert Exhibit 9 for 25 identification as of this date by the Page 139 1 C. JALBERT 2 Reporter.) 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 4 1:28 p.m. We're back on the record. 5 You may proceed. 6 Q. I think you have received 7 what's been marked as Jalbert Exhibit 9. 8 This bears the Bates Kwok 00001684. Do you 9 recognize this document? 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. Turning to the attachment, to 12 your knowledge, is this the final version 13 of the living expenses for the period 14 February 15th to February 28th? 15 A. Ithinkitis. 16 Q. I'll represent, if you add 17 \\$51,495.67 plus the 109 thousand -- 18 A. 161. 19 Q. So we're on the same page, this 20 is the final version? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. Does this final version reflect 23 Verdolino and Lowey's edits on the initial 24 draft provided by an unknown person? 25 A. Well, it's certainly -- as you 1 C. JALBERT 2 can see from the e-mail, we made 3 suggestions but counsel clearly reviewed 4 and assisted with the final decision and Page 140 5 I'm sure they also checked with the debtor. 6 I did not. 7 **Q.** So just walking through these 8 five suggestions, why did you increase the 9 meals to 50 percent or why did you 10 recommend increasing the meals to 50 11 percent? 12 A. Because there's a husband and a 13 wife and one hundred percent divided by two 14 is by 50 percent. 15 Q. Do you have any understanding 16 as to why the draft had allocated the 17 numbers in the way it had in Exhibit 7? 18 MR AULET: Objection to form. 19 A. So I think what the creator of 20 the initial -- my memory is the creator of 21 the initial document took into 22 consideration that occasionally, the 23 debtor's daughter and maybe one or two 24 other people occasionally showed up and so 25 I think they ascribed some of the cost to Page 141\n\n85\n\n36 (Pages 138 - 141)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 those people but our feeling in 3 consultation with the attorneys was that 4 the only reason those people are there is 5 they're coming to visit the debtor and 6 that's why they incurred the cost. So I 7 thought they should put 50 percent to the 8 husband and 50 percent to the wife and 9 that's how we got the 50 percent. 10 Q. Besides what you just described 11 to me, do you have anymore reasons for 12 suggesting the increase of 50 percent? 13 A. Not that I can remember. 14 Q. Item 2 is security is increased 15 to 100 and looking at the draft in Exhibit 16 7, it was 40 percent. What was your 1 7 reasoning for suggesting to increase the 18 security to 100? 19 A. Again, the only reason there's 20 any security at all is all about the 21 debtor. So in an abundance of caution, 22 we're ascribing that cost, one hundred 23 percent of that cost to the debtor. The 24 wife likely would not have security 25 concerns if she were not married to 1 C. JALBERT Page 142 2 Mr. Kwok and when the daughter or others 3 sometimes travel, they need security as 4 well. So for whatever reason, their 5 security is all related to the debtor. We 6 suggested going to a hundred percent. It 7 was discussed among the group and everyone 8 agreed to the 100 percent. 9 **Q.** What is the basis for your 10 assumption that the primary reason security 11 has been retained is directly related to 12 the debtor? 13 A. Discussion with Melissa Francis 14 and Aaron Mitchell who confirmed in several 15 phone calls that the debtor is harassed and 16 threatened and otherwise scared for his 1 7 existence and to the extent the -- I'm told 18 to the extent the family is scared, they're 19 scared because of their relationship to 20 their father. 21 **Q.** Is there any other reasoning 22 that you haven't articulated about the 23 basis for your increasing security to one 24 hundred? 25 A. Well, it is very conservative Page 143 C. JALBERT 2 to ascribe the one hundred percent of the 3 cost to the debtor is -- means that all 4 that costs -- we could have left it at 30 5 percent and probably made it a callable 6 argument of why it could be 30 percent. We 7 wanted to go with -- I think part of the 8 final reasoning amongst the group was that 9 it's conservative to report all ofit on 10 the debtor's behalf because ofhis safety 11 concerns is -- that was the reasoning. 12 **Q.** Thank you. Item 3 is utilities 13 increased to 50 percent and I'll represent 14 Exhibit 7 has it at 30 percent and you 15 ascribe the same explanation as the meals. 16 Is there any other -- 17 A. No, it's the same -- it's the 18 same -- it's the same theme at different 19 percentages for most of these. 20 **Q.** Item 4 refers to housekeeping. 21 I believe Verdolino and Lowey recommended 22 changing repair and maintenance to 23 housekeeping? 24 A. Well, as it turns out, once we 25 were able to speak with someone and get Page 144 1 C. JALBERT 2 some information that's behind the numbers, 3 we found out that that's the cost of the 4 maid for those 15 days or maids or maid 5 service or cleaning service and not 6 maintenance. So it's just a matter of 7 calling it what it was. Had we seen 8 detail, we would have understood that on a 9 more timely basis. 10 Q. Your reasoning for increasing 11 the allocation from 30 to 50 percent, is it 12 fair to say it's the same reasoning 13 behind -- 14 A. It's a husband and a wife. You 15 know, any other cleaning they do on behalf 16 of anybody else, the only reason they're 17 there is because the Kwok's are there. The 18 debtor and his spouse. 19 **Q.** You note at the bottom of the 20 page, \"in our opinion, it's best to be more 21 conservative\". That's another reasoning 22 behind your -- 23 A. Yes. 24 **Q.** -- suggestion to increase the 25 allocations? Is that yes? Page 145\n\n85\n\n37 (Pages 142 - 145)\n\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                       | 1  | C. JALBERT                                          |\n|-----|--------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------|\n| 2   | A.<br>Yes.                                       | 2  | THE WITNESS: Okay.                                  |\n| 3   | Q.<br>I do want to talk about the                | 3  | Turning to Page 2, Melissa<br>Q.                    |\n|     | 4 insurance changed to zero percent from 3 0     |    | 4 Francis notes that, \"since MK doesn't own         |\n|     | 5 percent.                                       |    | 5 the Connecticut property, can you please          |\n| 6   | MS. ARONSSON: I think,                           |    | 6 just explain the applicability of the             |\n| 7   | Makenzie, can you hand me Tab 14?                |    | 7 following entries as his monthly expenses?        |\n| 8   | A.<br>All done?                                  |    | 8 And what type of insurance is it?\" Do you         |\n| 9   | Yes. Before I show you the<br>Q.                 |    | 9 see that?                                         |\n|     | 10 document, do you recall information about     | 10 | A.<br>Yes.                                          |\n|     | 11 the change from 30 percent to zero percent    | 11 | Q.<br>What do you understand Ms.                    |\n|     | 12 for the insurance line item?                  |    | 12 Francis to be asking here?                       |\n| 13  | I recall talking with my<br>A.                   | 13 | A.<br>Since the debtor doesn't own                  |\n|     | 14 colleague about it after he found out the     |    | 14 the Connecticut property, can you please         |\n|     | 15 facts, yes.                                   |    | 15 justify the applicability of the following       |\n| 16  | What do you remember about that<br>Q.            |    | 16 entries as his monthly expenses and she's        |\n|     | 1 7 interaction?                                 |    | 17 asking what type of insurance.                   |\n| 18  | A.<br>Well, I think he found out the             | 18 | What is your view, ifany, on<br>Q.                  |\n|     | 19 insurance payment that --<br>that 13 thousand |    | 19 her question?                                    |\n|     | 20 dollars on Number 9 here was one hundred      | 20 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                        |\n|     | 21 percent pertaining to the Sherry apartment    | 21 | A.<br>I would like to answer them                   |\n|     | 22 in New York City where he did not live        |    | 22 correctly.                                       |\n|     | 23 during this time frame and so to the extent   | 23 | You would like to answer the<br>Q.                  |\n|     | 24 that someone is paying those bills of the     |    | 24 monthly reporting --                             |\n|     | 25 Sherry, I think that's the Sherry's problem   | 25 | A.<br>I'm hoping we answered her                    |\n|     | Page 146                                         |    | Page 148                                            |\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                       | 1  | C. JALBERT                                          |\n|     | 2 and not on account of the debtor because as    |    | 2 questions. I mean this is going onto the          |\n|     | 3 I'm told by the attorneys, everyone's          |    | 3 monthly reporting but I'm hoping we               |\n|     |                                                  |    |                                                     |\n|     | 4 understanding, from the facts is that he's     |    | 4 answered them correctly.                          |\n|     | 5 --<br>he does not have an interest in that     | 5  | Substantively, what is your<br>Q.                   |\n|     | 6 real estate. So he shouldn't have any          |    | 6 view on her question here?                        |\n|     | 7 percentage in the expenses shown on the        | 7  | MR AULET: Objection to form.                        |\n|     | 8 monthly operating report.                      | 8  | A.<br>I don't want to try and guess                 |\n| 9   | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                     |    | 9 what she was thinking.                            |\n| 10  | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 10 for                 | 10 | Q.<br>So you have no understanding --               |\n| 11  | identification as of this date by the            |    | 11 Verdolino and Lowey has no understanding         |\n| 12  | Reporter.)                                       |    | 12 about the question she's asking here?            |\n| 13  | MS. ARONSSON: The Court                          | 13 | A.<br>I have my understanding.                      |\n| 14  | Reporter is going to be handing you              | 14 | Q.<br>Okay. Turning to the first                    |\n| 15  | what's marked as Jalbert Exhibit 10.             |    | 15 page, Mr. Flynn responds, \"correct, he           |\n| 16  | This is a document produced in this              |    | 16 doesn't own it but he lives in the               |\n| 1 7 | matter with the Bates Kwok 00001691.             |    | 17 Connecticut house so these expenses that         |\n| 18  | I understand you're not on this<br>Q.            |    | 18 are paid are benefitting him\". Do you have       |\n|     | 19 document but I just want to discuss a         |    | 19 any understanding of what Mr. Flynn is           |\n|     | 20 couple issues here. Do you recognize this     |    | 20 saying here?                                     |\n|     | 21 document?                                     | 21 | A.<br>That's why he's saying that                   |\n| 22  | A.<br>No, but I recognize the                    |    | 22 since he lives there, he aught to be --          |\n|     | 23 subject.                                      |    | 23 there should be some level of those              |\n| 24  | MR HARBACH: Give him a minute                    |    | 24 expenses ascribed to him in the monthly          |\n| 25  | to read it.<br>Page 147                          |    | 25 operating report in that Question 8.<br>Page 149 |\n\n38 (Pages 146 - 149)\n\nPAX-014-038\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. Mr. Flynn continues, \"I have a 3 question regarding the insurance as well 4 since this is insurance on the apartment of 5 the Sherry\". Do you understand what issue 6 hes referring to here? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Can you explain it for me? 9 A. Well, in the Number 8 -- no, 10 Number 9, the original version of this had 11 insurance. We didn't know what it was 12 insurance on. Frankly, when we got it, we 13 assumed it was on the Greenwich residence 14 where the debtor and his spouse actually 15 reside. We factually found out that it's 16 actually insurance on the Sherry and when 17 we found out it's insurance on the Sherry, 18 since the debtor doesn't live there and 19 doesn't own it, by review of materials from 20 the lawyers, it should be eliminated and 21 that's what we proposed, to eliminate it. 22 Q. It was ultimately eliminated? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. Mr. Flynn continues \"I am not\" 25 I am not sure it should be included here? Page 150 1 C. JALBERT 2 I think that's what he means -- \"in this 3 calculation but interested on your thoughts 4 and also asking Craig\". Do you recall him 5 asking your opinion on this? 6 A. Yes. 7 **Q.** Is your opinion the same as 8 Mr. Flynn's here -- 9 A. Yes. 10 Q. Do you recall speaking with 11 Mr. Flynn about that? 12 A. I do. 13 **Q.** Turning to the top e-mail here 14 on this chain, on Page 1, Mr. Flynn asks, 15 \"how much was paid during this period for 16 the Sherry\". Do you see that? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. Do you know the answer to that 19 question? 20 A. I have no idea. Also, I don't 21 know why he asked it. 22 Q. That was going to be my 23 question. Why would it matter whether -- 24 how much it was as to whether it should be 25 included in the monthly operating report? Page 151 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. I don't know. 3 **Q.** The original allocation to this 4 line item I think is -- 5 **MR HARBACH:** Right here 6 (indicating). 7 **Q.** -- at 13 thousand and that's 8 reflected on Page 2. \\$13,611. Besides Ms. 9 Francis' e-mail, do you have any 10 independent knowledge of that information? 11 MR AULET: Objection to form. 12 A. No. It came from Melissa 13 Francis. I don't know where she got that 14 number from or why. 15 Q. Did you look into insurance for 16 the Greenwich property? 17 A. No. 18 Q. Why not? 19 A. We asked for someone in the -- 20 with the correct knowledge to give us all 21 of the expenses paid cash, check, wire 22 transfer, **HCH,** any other method, February 23 15th to February 28th on behalf of the 24 debtor. We didn't leave any -- we didn't 25 ask for -- we didn't leave any Page 152 1 C. JALBERT 2 restrictions. We just said give us all of 3 that information. We got a summary chart. 4 You saw it and it wasn't till we started 5 asking questions to understand some of the 6 background and what is behind the numbers 7 that we started making assessments and 8 changing what we think the legal group and 9 us thought it was appropriate. 10 CONTINUED EXAMINATION 11 BY MR HARBACH: 12 Q. You said a moment ago that 13 originally, you and your team thought that 14 the 13 -- excuse me, I think you said you 15 assumed that the \\$13,611 was for the 16 Greenwich property because that's where he 17 was living. I got that right? 18 A. Yes, sir. 19 Q. Then you were told that the 20 13,611 was actually for the Sherry, right? 21 A. Correct 22 Q. And at that point, you did not 23 inquire about was there actually any 24 insurance money paid for the Greenwich 25 property during this period, you didn't ask Page 153\n\n85\n\n39 (Pages 150 - 153)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 that question? 3 A. No, we assumed -- actually, 4 Matt had confirmed this is a list of all 5 the payments made during this time frame. 6 So we had the universe that wasn't another 7 insurance payment and you know, most -- 8 many of us have owned homes. My own 9 empirical knowledge is you typically pay 10 your homeowner's insurance once a year. 11 It's usually -- in the Sherry, this 13 12 thousand dollars might have been just a 13 payment for the year on a 2 .5 million 14 dollar entity. They didn'ttell us it was 15 a payment so I didn't ask. 16 CONTINUED EXAMINATION 17 BY **MS. ARONSSON:**  18 **Q.** So I think we've covered the 19 work that you have done in connection with 20 the monthly operating report for the period 21 February 15th to February 28th. We've been 22 looking at that document. Is that right? 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. Can you think of anything else 25 that we haven't talked about with the work 1 C. JALBERT 2 that you've done, in connection with 3 preparing that document? 4 A. Off the top of my head, no. 5 Q. I think you referenced you're 6 preparing the next reporting cycle? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Can you describe your general 9 process and how that defers, if it does, Page 154 10 with your reporting cycle for the February 11 15th to February 28th period? 12 A. So the monthly operating report 13 is basically presenting information and the 14 two buckets of information that are in the 15 monthly operating report as for this debtor 16 is that Question E, the funds disbursed on 1 7 his behalf in the 31 day period, March 1 to 18 March 31, we're going to -- we're going to 19 figure out -- we're going to get a list. 20 This time, we're going to get a list so we 21 can see what there was and we can have -- 22 we can have more educated discussion with 23 the lawyers about what was paid. That will 24 be summarized and categorized and put in 25 Schedule E and in addition, we're working Page 155 1 C. JALBERT 2 with the Brown Rudnick firm and Melissa 3 Francis and Aaron Mitchell to determine 4 what the accrual of professional fees. All 5 professionals, state professionals, 6 committee professionals, debtor 7 professionals, ordinary course -- alleged 8 ordinary course professionals, everybody 9 because we need to record the accrual. So 10 it's not just -- the operating report is 11 not just asking for what was paid during 12 that period. It's asking for what's the -- 13 the new form is asking what are the unpaid 14 amounts and we couldn't get it in time to 15 get the February one. So we're going to 16 catch up in this March one, we're going to 17 establish what the February accrual was and 18 we're going to find out what the March 19 accrual was and then we'll have the correct 20 information and it will have to be 21 maintained as we go along and obviously, as 22 time goes on, if things go according to the 23 way the debtor would like, there will be 24 payment on those fees. So there'll be more 25 accruals and then payments and the same C. JALBERT 2 thing is true of the estate professionals 3 and the committee and its professionals. 4 It will be a roll forward of what the 5 liability is and the cash will be reported 6 on Page 1. It will create liability to the 7 United States Trustee for their fee -- 8 their -- their -- it's a fee. It's not a 9 commission. Their fee for -- which is Page 156 10 entirely predicated on cash disbursements 11 during the time of the monthly operating 12 report. 13 **Q.** Do you anticipate -- strike 14 that. Besides information that you'll 15 receive from Brown Rudnick, from Aaron 16 Mitchell, from Melissa Francis and an 1 7 unknown person, do you anticipate doing any 18 investigation in connection with future 19 monthly operating reports? 20 MR AULET: Objection to form. 21 A. I don't know what you 22 consider -- I'm not going to -- we're going 23 to get a report from someone. That report 24 is going to list out all of the payments 25 made during a specific time period. We're Page 157\n\n85\n\n40 (Pages 154 - 157)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 going to review that with our own 3 professional knowledge and with the lawyers 4 to make sure it all makes sense. We might 5 ask questions based on what shows up on the 6 spreadsheet but I'm not going to ask for a 7 copy of the cancelled check, a bank 8 statement or the invoice that was paid. So 9 no investigation of that, just a sanity 10 check or a reasonableness check and confer 11 with counsel to be sure that we understand 12 what's on that sheet and what we're going 13 to report. 14 Q. So essentially, you'll rely on 15 the rolled up numbers that are provided to 16 you from the individuals we've talked 17 about? 18 A. Again, except for some queries 19 that we'll make depending on what the 20 information we get. Ifwe get -- if 21 insurance shows up again, we're going to 22 ask insurance on what. If repairs and 23 maintenance shows up again, we're going to 24 confirm it's not the maid. So we'll use 25 some common sense and we'll confer with the Page 158 1 C. JALBERT 2 lawyers based on what we see but I won't 3 know what we're going to do until we see 4 what -- and I hope it's soon. What's 5 today, April 8th? 6 Q. Thank you. Okay, just quickly 7 turning back to Exhibit 8 which is I think 8 the final living expense report for the 9 period February 15th, 2022 to February 10 28th, 2022. I think you had referenced an 11 erroneous amount included in here. Can you 12 just explain again what you meant by that? 13 A. I don't remember exactly what 14 the number is but on the security line, 15 Line Number 9, the amount referenced her 43 16 thousand dollars. That 43 thousand dollars 17 included a payment of -- my memory is 18 something like 12 or 14 thousand dollars 19 that was paid February 10 and so we got 20 this report, the original one, and didn't 21 know the back -- the background and when 22 they -- when they showed us the background 23 and the list of--we saw February 10. So 24 we realized we had the opposite mistake of 25 the time with the two professionals where Page 159 C. JALBERT 2 they paid post-petition pre-petition. Here 3 they paid pre-petition, pre-petition but 4 should have been excluded from the monthly 5 operating report. Legitimate charge. It 6 wasn't an overpayment or anything. It just 7 didn't belong reported in the February 8 monthly operating report. 9 Q. So is it fair to say you later 10 received a more detailed breakdown of these 11 items that was included in this -- 12 A. I believe we got a more 13 detailed -- but it was -- it was 14 significantly past that time. Everything 15 at that time was done by reviewing, 16 talking, Melissa and Aaron talking with 1 7 whoever and Matt talking to whoever. It 18 was all done by e-mail and orally. We 19 didn't get a spreadsheet of the detail 20 until sometime later, long after it was 21 filed and actually, after the time that we 22 made available our records that we got -- 23 the detail listing which is when we figured 24 out oh we got a problem with the monthly 25 operating report. It's just a matter of, Page 160 1 C. JALBERT 2 you know, whoever is preparing these things 3 isn't used to the rules, isn't used to 4 what's got to be displayed -- disclosed and 5 what's not going to be disclosed. We try 6 and give them guidance and they just made a 7 minor error. We'll fix it next month. 8 Q. Thankyou. Youcansetthat 9 aside. Do you recall receiving an inquiry 10 from someone at U.S. DOJ regarding the 11 monthly operating report? 12 A. I think I actually reached out 13 to them first and my reaching out to them 14 first was -- and that's how -- was -- I 15 don't know if anyone's ever prepared a 16 monthly operating report, is there one 17 here? So the monthly operating report, up 18 until December 31 or January 31 was one, 19 two -- these two pages (indicating), Page 8 20 which is now Page 8 and Page 9 and there 21 might have been one more -- I thought it 22 was five pages. It might have been four. 23 And I filed these monthly operating reports 24 in several cases and it had been driving me 25 crazy for three months that I would -- I Page 161\n\n85\n\n41 (Pages 158 - 161)\n\n| 1     | C. JALBERT                                               |    | C. JALBERT                                           |\n|-------|----------------------------------------------------------|----|------------------------------------------------------|\n|       | 2 would --<br>the way the monthly operating              |    | 2 have done anyway's.                                |\n|       | 3 reports, the bottom, for the first page, it            | 3  | We've talked about your<br>Q.                        |\n|       | 4 allows you to use save if you're inputting             |    | 4 experience in Chapter 11 individual                |\n|       | 5 data so that you can review it but it                  |    | 5 bankruptcies before. Reflecting on your            |\n|       | 6 retains a watermark up until the time you              |    | 6 experience in these instances, were any --         |\n|       | 7 hit a button that says send the data out to            |    | 7 do you have any --<br>can you cite any case        |\n|       | 8 the United States Trustees website and it              |    | 8 where you've seen such a great disparity           |\n|       | 9 does whatever it does and when it did that,            |    | 9 between the debtor's punitive assets and           |\n|       | 10 it kept on coming back with these extra six           |    | 10 the stated liabilities?                           |\n|       | 11 pages and this nonsense (indicating). So I            | 11 | A.<br>No. In my individual cases,                    |\n|       | 12 actually reached out to the U.S. Trustees             |    | 12 the 373 million dollars of liabilities is         |\n|       | 13 Office saying what are we doing wrong.                |    | 13 the most I've ever seen.                          |\n|       | 14 It's midnight and we're trying to get this            | 14 | MS. ARONSSON: We don't have                          |\n|       | 15 thing in. He says no, everyone's having the           | 15 | anymore questions.                                   |\n|       | 16 same problem. We've just finally figured              | 16 | MR AULET: I have nothing.                            |\n|       | 17 out that's what's supposed to happen. So              | 17 | MR GOLDMAN: I have a few                             |\n|       | 18 that's when we started talking with him and           | 18 | follow-ups. I'll just be a couple                    |\n|       | 19 then when he saw it, he had our e-mail                | 19 | hours.                                               |\n|       | 20 addresses and we --<br>and he was looking for         | 20 | THE WITNESS: Beautiful. Do                           |\n|       | 21 the support for the 161, I believe is what            | 21 | you mind if I go get a bottle of                     |\n|       | 22 he was asking for. I don't have it in                 | 22 | scotch?                                              |\n|       | 23 front of me or if I do, I didn't --<br>I don't        | 23 | MR GOLDMAN: Get me one too.                          |\n| 24 -- | but that's my recollection, that's why                   | 24 | I'm Irve Goldman --                                  |\n|       | 25 he reached out was to get --<br>to get that           | 25 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Can you give                       |\n|       | Page 162                                                 |    | Page 164                                             |\n|       |                                                          |    |                                                      |\n| 1     | C. JALBERT                                               | 1  | C. JALBERT                                           |\n|       | 2 and to get the I think accrual of the                  | 2  | him the microphone, please?                          |\n|       | 3 professional fees going forward.                       | 3  | MR AULET: Yes. Can I take us                         |\n| 4     | Q.<br>Did you have a call regarding                      | 4  | off the record really quick so I can                 |\n|       | 5 the monthly operating report and further               | 5  |                                                      |\n|       | 6 details on the line items?                             | 6  | MR HARBACH: Sure.                                    |\n| 7     | A.<br>Not a call. You have whatever                      | 7  | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                        |\n|       | 8 e-mails there were. It was very --<br>I was            | 8  | 1:56 p.m. and we are off the record.                 |\n|       | 9 very limited. My call to him was a general             | 9  | (Whereupon, an off-the-record                        |\n|       | 10 question on my three cases, I'm trying to             | 10 | discussion was held.)                                |\n|       | 11 file these. He was able to answer my                  | 11 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                        |\n|       | 12 question --<br>my main question. He then,             | 12 | 1:58 p.m. We're back on the record.                  |\n|       | 13 when he saw the monthly operating report,             | 13 | You may proceed.                                     |\n|       | 14 he said hey, I need this and we're going to           |    | 14 EXAMINATION BY                                    |\n|       | 15 obviously arrange to do that.                         |    | 15 MR GOLDMAN:                                       |\n| 16    | Q.<br>So was it the inquiry from the                     | 16 | Q.<br>Good afternoon. Irve Goldman,                  |\n|       | 17 trustee that prompted Verdolino and Lowey             |    | 17 Pullman and Comley for the Creditor's             |\n|       | 18 to request additional details and                     |    | 18 Committee. You mentioned you were                 |\n|       | 19 breakdowns of the line items contained in             |    | 19 certified as an insolvency restructuring          |\n|       | 20 the monthly operating Excel that we've                |    | 20 expert. Did I get that right?                     |\n|       | 21 looked at?                                            | 21 | A.<br>Advisor.                                       |\n| 22    | A.<br>No. We wanted to do that                           | 22 | Advisor, for how long?<br>Q.                         |\n|       | 23 anyway's. That just --<br>that gave us more           | 23 | A.<br>Well, the actual designation                   |\n|       | 24 fuel to bring it to them to say hey, we got           |    | 24 came in 1999 but in 1999, when I got the          |\n|       | 25 to get to this. That's something we would<br>Page 163 |    | 25 designation, I had to spend over four<br>Page 165 |\n\n42 (Pages 162 - 165)\n\nPAX-014-042\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                     | 1        | C. JALBERT                                          |\n|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------|\n|          | 2 thousand hours and have been in the                                          | 2        | and I -- and I regret completely that               |\n|          | 3 profession for eight years at that point.                                    | 3        | we were brought in as a financial                   |\n|          | 4 So 30 years ago.                                                             | 4        | advisor and not an accountant to the                |\n| 5        | Do you typically call on that<br>Q.                                            | 5        | debtor. Most of what you see on that                |\n|          | 6 expertise when you're engaged as a                                           | 6        | motion to employ is very important                  |\n|          | 7 professional in Chapter 11 cases?                                            | 7        | stuff in the process ofbankruptcy.                  |\n| 8        | Certainly some of it, yes.<br>A.                                               | 8        | The schedules, the SOFA's, the --the                |\n| 9        | What aspects of the debtor's<br>Q.                                             | 9        | monthly operating reports, tax return               |\n|          | 10 financial profile do you view as needing                                    | 10       | preparation, analysis of claims and I               |\n|          | 11 restructuring?                                                              | 11       | don't know whether we'll have a role                |\n| 12       | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                                   | 12       | in that or not. It depends on what                  |\n| 13       | A.<br>Needing restructuring, I don't                                           | 13       | the nature of the claim is. Most of                 |\n|          | 14 understand your question.                                                   | 14       | these claims will be legally analyzed               |\n| 15       | Q.<br>Well, you're a certified                                                 | 15       | but there might be a hundred reasons                |\n|          | 16 insolvency restructuring expert. You call                                   | 16       | why someone that filed a claim --                   |\n|          | 1 7 upon that expertise in your engagements in                                 | 17       | there might be an accounting                        |\n|          | 18 Chapter 11 cases. What is it about the                                      | 18       | attached, they do want us to                        |\n|          | 19 debtor's financial profile that you view as                                 | 19       | investigate. So we're not brought in                |\n|          | 20 in need of restructuring?                                                   | 20       | to -- just because we think there's                 |\n| 21       | A.<br>Well, you know --                                                        | 21       | going to be a reorganization.                       |\n| 22       | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                                   | 22       | Bankruptcy is a process. There's an                 |\n| 23       | Do you view it as in need of<br>Q.                                             | 23       | awful lot of paper that gets pushed                 |\n|          | 24 restructuring?                                                              | 24       | by an awful lot of people. This                     |\n| 25       | A.<br>No, I don't.                                                             | 25       | particular debtor is -- as I                        |\n|          |                                                                                |          |                                                     |\n|          | Page 166                                                                       |          | Page 168                                            |\n|          |                                                                                |          |                                                     |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                     | 1        | C. JALBERT                                          |\n| 2        | You don't?<br>Q.                                                               | 2        | understand it, is in excess of 70                   |\n| 3        | A.<br>Absolutely not.                                                          | 3        | years old. Doesn't even have an                     |\n| 4        | Q.<br>So why do you believe he filed                                           | 4        | e-mail address. Doesn't know how to                 |\n|          | 5 Chapter 11 then?                                                             | 5        | use computers. Doesn't know                         |\n| 6        | A.<br>Well, the debtor needs                                                   | 6        | technology. Couldn't possibly do the                |\n|          | 7 restructuring. I don't think --                                              | 7        | monthly operating reports himself and               |\n| 8        | (Whereupon, a cell phone rang.)                                                | 8        | virtually, in every case, there's an                |\n| 9        | THE WITNESS: Oh, I apologize.                                                  | 9        | accountant that does tax returns.                   |\n| 10       | That was for me to remind me to do                                             | 10       | There's an accountant that does --                  |\n| 11       | something at 2:00 which I can't                                                | 11       | that helps with preparing monthly                   |\n| 12       | remember what I'm supposed to do.                                              | 12       | operating reports. Even when the                    |\n| 13       | Just making sure it wasn't on --<br>what                                       | 13       | company has a controller, we still                  |\n| 14       | is that when it comes back on later                                            | 14       | come in in cases where -- so there                  |\n| 15       | and it annoys you? The debtor's                                                | 15       | may not be a reorganization as of                   |\n| 16       | restructuring, if you're referring to                                          | 16       | right now. There's going to be a                    |\n| 17       | the questions were brought up --<br>in                                         | 17       | plan someday. I don't know what role                |\n| 18       | an ordinary Chapter 11 case that's a                                           | 18       | we're going to play but if we need to               |\n| 19       | business, there's lots of things to                                            | 19       | be -- if the counsel and debtor needs               |\n| 20       | consider if there's a real                                                     | 20       | us to play a role, we will but until                |\n| 21       | restructuring. You've got to                                                   | 21       | that day, there's lots of necessary                 |\n| 22       | restructure the debt, the secure                                               | 22       | work to do in the ordinary course of                |\n| 23       | debt. Maybe mezzanine, unsecured                                               | 23       | the process in the life of a Chapter                |\n| 24<br>25 | debt. Maybe work with payables, all<br>sorts of --<br>that isn't the case here | 24<br>25 | 11 case here.<br>Q.<br>What you just described were |\n\n43 (Pages 166 - 169)\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                              |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n|    | 2 menial tasks of accounting?                                                             |    | 2 counsel wants us to play and the debtor                                               |\n| 3  | A.<br>I disagree.                                                                         |    | 3 wants us to play. If they want us to play                                             |\n| 4  | Q.<br>No, you disagree?                                                                   |    | 4 part of the role of looking at the                                                    |\n| 5  | A.<br>Preparing the SOF A's and                                                           |    | 5 pre-petition payments, which we ordinarily                                            |\n|    | 6 preparing the MO R's, you think that's all                                              |    | 6 do in most of the cases we do, we come up                                             |\n|    | 7 menial tasks?                                                                           |    | 7 with the list, here it already exists. We                                             |\n| 8  | All right, I won't argue with<br>Q.                                                       |    | 8 might ask for support to confirm but it's                                             |\n|    | 9 you on that. What is it about this case                                                 |    | 9 entirely up to the team that's running the                                            |\n|    | you view that is in need of<br>10 that you --                                             |    | 10 case. We're not running the case. We're                                              |\n|    | 11 restructuring, if anything?                                                            |    | 11 -- we're -- I think we're an important                                               |\n| 12 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                                              |    | 12 member of the team but we're not --<br>the                                           |\n| 13 | A.<br>Yeah, I don't know what you're                                                      |    | 13 accounting firm is not driving the case.                                             |\n|    | 14 trying to ask.                                                                         |    | 14 The debtor and his counsel is driving the                                            |\n| 15 | Q.<br>Are there assets that need to                                                       |    | 15 case as is true of every case.                                                       |\n|    | 16 be restructured?                                                                       | 16 | Do you know where the debtor's<br>Q.                                                    |\n| 17 | A.<br>The only assets I understand                                                        |    | 17 books and records reside?                                                            |\n|    | 18 are -- I think the lawyers call them                                                   | 18 | A.<br>I do not.                                                                         |\n|    | 19 litigation assets in the like.                                                         | 19 | Do you know if the debtor had a<br>Q.                                                   |\n| 20 | So how would they be<br>Q.                                                                |    | 20 pre-petition account?                                                                |\n|    | 21 restructured or part of a restructuring?                                               | 21 | A.<br>Only from knowledge from                                                          |\n| 22 | MR AULET: Objection to form.                                                              |    | 22 lawyers.                                                                             |\n| 23 | A.<br>You're probably asking the                                                          | 23 | Who was the accountant?<br>Q.                                                           |\n|    | 24 wrong guy but if there's ongoing                                                       | 24 | A.<br>Accountant?                                                                       |\n|    | 25 litigation, I suspect there's going to be                                              | 25 | Yeah, I asked you --<br>Q.                                                              |\n|    | Page 170                                                                                  |    | Page 172                                                                                |\n|    |                                                                                           |    |                                                                                         |\n|    |                                                                                           |    |                                                                                         |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                                | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                                              |\n|    | 2 --<br>you would hope there would be settlement                                          | 2  | Oh actually, I take that back.<br>A.                                                    |\n|    | 3 negotiations, there might be mediation,                                                 |    | 3 I saw actual tax returns. There was --                                                |\n|    | 4 there might be arbitration. Someone's                                                   |    | 4 every preparer has to list their name on a                                            |\n|    | 5 going to try and liquidate those assets<br>6 into cash with which to pay the creditors. |    | 5 tax return they prepare. So there was --<br>6 someone paid tax returns at least. What |\n|    | 7 I don't know whether we'll play a part in                                               |    | 7 else they did, I don't know.                                                          |\n|    | 8 that or not.                                                                            | 8  | Okay, what was the name of the<br>Q.                                                    |\n| 9  | the scope of<br>As part of your --<br>Q.                                                  |    | 9 accountant?                                                                           |\n|    | 10 your engagement, there is a bullet point                                               | 10 | A.<br>I don't remember.                                                                 |\n|    | 11 that states that you're going to provide                                               | 11 | Q.<br>Have the tax returns been                                                         |\n|    | 12 assistance --                                                                          |    | 12 produced to any party in the case thus far?                                          |\n| 13 | THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry,                                                            | 13 | A.<br>I imagine we produced them                                                        |\n| 14 | Counsel. I need to hear you better.                                                       |    | 14 because we had them. They would have come                                            |\n| 15 | Q.<br>Provide assistance with                                                             |    | 15 in an e-mail. So they would have been                                                |\n|    | 16 reviewing debtor books and records for                                                 |    | 16 produced as it relates to this I think. I                                            |\n|    | 17 possibly avoidable transactions such as                                                |    | 1 7 think they were but they were very small                                            |\n|    | 18 preference and fraudulent transfer claims.                                             |    | 18 tax returns prepared by --<br>I assume a New                                         |\n|    | 19 You stated that you did not review any of                                              |    | 19 Yark or a Connecticut accountant. I don't                                            |\n|    | 20 the debtor's books and records, correct?                                               |    | 20 knowwho.                                                                             |\n| 21 | A.<br>Currently, so far, yes.                                                             | 21 | You just don't --you obviously<br>Q.                                                    |\n| 22 | Q.<br>Did you ask for any?                                                                |    | 22 looked at it, you just don't recall the                                              |\n| 23 | A.<br>No.                                                                                 |    | 23 name of that accountant right now?                                                   |\n| 24 | Q.<br>Do you intend to?                                                                   | 24 | A.<br>I don't -- well, yes. I'm not                                                     |\n| 25 | A.<br>Depends on what role the<br>Page 171                                                |    | 25 even sure ifl looked at it. I don't know<br>Page 173                                 |\n\n44 (Pages 170 - 173)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 if, at the time when we were trying to do 3 everything, we were using those because we 4 needed some of the information on there. 5 We were referred to them by Melissa for 6 certain issues that the lawyers thought 7 were important and we went and took a look 8 at them but I would have looked at 9 something besides the name of the preparer. 10 At the time, it didn't matter. 11 Q. Have you ever spoken to the 12 debtor? 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. When? 15 A. Wednesday at the 341 hearing to 16 introduce myself. 1 7 **Q.** Is that the only occasion, to 18 your knowledge, that you've spoken to the 19 debtor? 20 A. I don't speak Mandarin and he 21 apparently doesn't speak English. So I 22 have not spoken to him. Or Chinese. I'm 23 not sure which it is. Excuse me. 24 Q. You did not receive a 25 post-petition retainer, correct? Page 174 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. Correct. 3 **Q.** Are you confident that your 4 fees will be paid? 5 A. I don't know ifl'm confident. 6 I'm hoping. 7 **Q.** What source do you believe your 8 fees will be paid, from what source? 9 A. It will come from the Estate. <sup>10</sup>If we're going to be paid, as I understand 11 it, it will come from the Estate. I don't 12 -- I have not thought of or have any 13 agreement on any other source of payment. 14 Q. Do you mean the litigation 15 claims or recoveries? 16 A. I would expect the only people 17 that have a retainer in this case are Brown 18 Rudnick. Everybody else will be looking to 19 be paid -- that is a debtor's professional 20 or a committee professional, professionals 21 that file an application with the Court and 22 the Court allows their retention will be 23 looking to get funds. We're all going to 24 be looking from the same place. What that 25 source is going to be, if it will ever be, Page 175 1 C. JALBERT 2 I don't know. 3 Q. What information, if any, did 4 you rely on in getting comfortable taking 5 this case without a post-petition retainer? 6 A. I've been doing this for 35 7 years. I'm not sure. I don't remember 8 ever getting a post-petition retainer but 9 my firm works with -- 10 (Whereupon, a cellphone rang.) 11 THE WITNESS: Shit, I'm sorry. 12 Now it's off. We -- we're a 13 practitioner in Massachusetts and we 14 do cases in Delaware, New York, 15 Connecticut, Rhode Island, 16 Massachusetts, New Hampshire, 1 7 Vermont, Maine. We represent Chapter 18 7 trustees in virtually all of those 19 states. We probably represent and do 20 work for virtually ever Chapter 7 21 trustee in Rhode Island, every 22 Chapter 7 trustee in Massachusetts, a 23 couple in Maine, a couple in New 24 Hampshire and it's not unheard of for 25 us to go and do 50, 60, 70, 80 Page 176 1 C. JALBERT 2 thousand dollars of work before we 3 even know the case will ever have any 4 money. It's an investment that we 5 make. Now I didn't make an 6 investment in this case. Whatever we 7 incurred -- and I don't know what 8 that is, I'm hoping I'm going to 9 collect it but if I don't, then I'll 10 have a write-off like I've had many, 11 many, many, many times in the past. 12 Q. Again, I don't think you 13 answered my question. 14 A. Oh all right -- 15 Q. If you -- if you relied just on 16 your experience in engagements in 17 bankruptcy cases and that's it for taking 18 this case without a pre or post-petition 19 retainer, is that what you mean -- 20 A. I don't understand your 21 question. 22 **Q.** What information, if any, did 23 you rely on in taking this case without a 24 pre or post-petition retainer? 25 MR. AULET: Objection to form. Page 177\n\n85\n\n45 (Pages 174 - 177)\n\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                                                      | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                               |\n|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2   | I do work with lots and lots of<br>A.                                           |    | 2 engagement?                                                            |\n|     | 3 attorneys and when attorneys call up and                                      | 3  | A.<br>Absolutely not.                                                    |\n|     | 4 they ask if we're interested on working on                                    | 4  | Have you had any communications<br>Q.                                    |\n|     | 5 the case, I work on the case.                                                 |    | 5 with any representative from Golden Hill?                              |\n| 6   | So you relied on being asked to<br>Q.                                           | 6  | MR. HARBACH: Golden Spring.                                              |\n|     | 7 get involved by Brown Rudnick?                                                | 7  | Golden Spring.<br>Q.                                                     |\n| 8   | A.<br>Yep.                                                                      | 8  | A.<br>I was on e-mails with someone                                      |\n| 9   | That's it?<br>Q.                                                                |    | well, first of all, Melissa Francis<br>9 from --                         |\n| 10  | A.<br>Yep, and then after that, it's                                            |    | 10 has a Golden Spring e-mail address. She's                             |\n|     | 11 bankruptcy process. Whatever happens,                                        |    | 11 counsel to the debtor. I've been informed                             |\n|     | 12 happens.                                                                     |    | 12 of that from the beginning. The only other                            |\n| 13  | You didn't look at the<br>Q.                                                    |    | 13 contact --                                                            |\n|     | 14 financial profile of this debtor at all in                                   | 14 | She'scounselforthedebtoror<br>Q.                                         |\n|     | 15 determining --                                                               |    | 15 Golden Spring?                                                        |\n| 16  | A.<br>I think --<br>I think I knew he                                           | 16 | A.<br>Debtor.                                                            |\n|     | 1 7 had limited assets or no assets and I think                                 | 17 | Q.<br>Melissa --                                                         |\n|     | 18 I knew he had a lot of litigation ongoing                                    | 18 | A.<br>Francis.                                                           |\n|     | 19 but --<br>maybe I'm a fool but I only have one                               | 19 | Q.<br>But she has an e-mail address                                      |\n|     | 20 other person that I have to answer to and                                    |    | 20 from Golden Spring?                                                   |\n|     | 21 he lets me run my business just like he                                      | 21 | Correct. They were in all of<br>A.                                       |\n|     | 22 runs his business and my feeling is when a                                   |    | 22 these e-mails that they were putting in                               |\n|     | 23 lawyer calls up and they have a case, then                                   |    | 23 front ofme.                                                           |\n|     | 24 we respond because ifl don't respond,                                        | 24 | She's counsel for the debtor is<br>Q.                                    |\n|     | 25 maybe the next time he calls another                                         |    | 25 your understanding --                                                 |\n|     | Page 178                                                                        |    | Page 180                                                                 |\n|     |                                                                                 |    |                                                                          |\n|     |                                                                                 |    |                                                                          |\n| 1   | C. JALBERT                                                                      | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                               |\n|     | 2 accountant. So I didn't do all the things                                     | 2  | I've been told emphatically by<br>A.                                     |\n|     | 3 that you think a normal person should have                                    |    | 3 her and by Brown Rudnick that she is                                   |\n| 5   | 4 done to protect themselves on payment.<br>Q.<br>Did you rely on any degree on |    | 4 counsel to the debtor, as is Aaron<br>5 Mitchell. As is Brown Rudnick. |\n|     |                                                                                 | 6  | Q.                                                                       |\n| 7   | 6 the financial profile of Golden Spring?<br>A.<br>No.                          |    | Okay. Are they part of the<br>7 application to retain ordinary course    |\n| 8   | You didn't do any due diligence<br>Q.                                           |    | 8 professionals, if you know?                                            |\n|     | 9 on Golden Spring before agreeing to get                                       | 9  | A.<br>I don't know that they're going                                    |\n|     | 10 engaged in this case?                                                        |    | 10 to be paid by the Estate or not. I don't                              |\n| 11  | A.<br>I'm pretty sure I didn't know                                             |    | 11 know what they're --<br>what they're --<br>what                       |\n|     | 12 Golden Spring existed by the time I agreed                                   |    | 12 motions they filed to be paid. I'm not --                             |\n|     | 13 to be in this case.                                                          |    | 13 I'm not representing them and I'm not                                 |\n| 14  | Q.<br>How about Lamp Capital, did you                                           |    | 14 asking them.                                                          |\n|     | 15 do any investigation of Lamp Capital?                                        | 15 | Q.<br>So back to the question whether                                    |\n| 16  | A.<br>No.                                                                       |    | 16 you had any communications with Golden                                |\n| 1 7 | Q.<br>Did you ask any questions about                                           |    | 17 Spring --                                                             |\n|     | 18 what the financial profile of those two                                      | 18 | A.<br>So my colleague, Matt Flynn,                                       |\n|     | 19 entities was --                                                              |    | 19 had I think one or two phone calls with                               |\n| 20  | A.<br>No.                                                                       |    | 20 someone at Golden Spring. There was a                                 |\n| 21  | --<br>before getting involved?<br>Q.                                            |    | 21 number of e-mails which we looked at in                               |\n| 22  | A.<br>No.                                                                       |    | 22 here and you know, 6, 7, 8, 9, whatever,                              |\n| 23  | Q.<br>Were you promised that you                                                |    | 23 that person is not identified but I did not                           |\n|     | 24 would be paid from Golden Hill or Lamp                                       |    | 24 speak to that person. I had --<br>I was on                            |\n|     | 25 Capital before agreeing to take on the<br>Page 179                           |    | 25 the e-mail exchanges and I wrote exactly<br>Page 181                  |\n\n46 (Pages 1 78 - 181)\n\n1 C. JALBERT 2 one e-mail to that person and actually 3 directed it to Melissa and Aaron when I 4 wrote my e-mail. 5 Q. Do you know why that person's 6 name is redacted on the exhibit? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Why? 9 A. Because you heard Golden 10 Spring's attorney. They're worried about 11 the safety of their employees given the 12 issues surrounding this case. I don't know 13 anything about that. I'm just doing what I 14 told. I am not disclosing the name. 15 Q. It was at Golden Spring's 16 counsel's behest that that was redacted is 17 your understanding? 18 A. Well, I don't know whether it 19 was Golden Spring's counsel or Golden 20 Spring itself. I don't know -- I don't 21 know who started it. I just -- in fact, I 22 don't think I knew it until the day before 23 -- the day before, maybe Wednesday is when 24 I found out that -- that -- that the 25 documents were redacted. Page 182 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. Is it your understanding that, 3 according to the debtor, all of his living 4 expenses, pre-petition, were paid by Golden 5 Spring? 6 A. Well, they were paid by 7 somebody else. I can't say emphatically 8 they were paid by Golden Spring. 9 Q. So whatever that person or 10 entity -- whoever that person or entity 11 was, are the living expenses, post-petition 12 living expenses that were prepared in the 13 various schedules, consistent with what was 14 paid pre-petition? 15 A. We didn't do an investigation 16 as to what the pre-petition nature of 1 7 payments or amount of the payments or 18 anything. So I don't have any -- any 19 comparative information. That information 20 will be developed as we see the months go 21 by but I think the final -- the final 22 number for 15 days of the expenses for the 23 individual ended up being something like 28 24 or 29 thousand dollars for 15 days. So 25 multiply that by two 60 thousand dollars Page 183 1 C. JALBERT 2 for the month of which two-thirds of that 3 is security. 4 Q. Is the person or entity that is 5 funding the post-petition living expenses 6 Golden Spring? 7 A. I don't know. That's not one 8 of the questions and no one has volunteered 9 that information. It just says -- the 10 question says is there a third-party making 11 payments on behalf of the debtor 12 post-petition. We answered that question 13 as best we could. We'll fix the one error 14 that remains but it did not ask and they 15 did not tell us, to my knowledge, who is 16 making the disbursements. 17 Q. And you didn't ask? 18 A. No. I don't know how it would 19 affect -- it's not in the monthly operating 20 report so it's none ofmy business I think 21 is what I would have been told. 22 **MR. GOLDMAN:** I don't have any 23 further questions. 24 MR. AULET: I have nothing. 25 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Can I take 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 184 **C. JALBERT**  us off the record for the day? MR GOLDMAN: Yes. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're off the record at 2: 18 p.m. and this concludes today's testimony given by Craig Jalbert. (Whereupon, at 2: 18 **P.M.,** the Examination of this witness was concluded.) 0 0 0 0 Page 185\n\n85\n\n47 (Pages 182 - 185)\n\n1 2 3 DECLARATION 4 I hereby certify that having been 5 first duly sworn to testify to the truth, I 6 gave the above testimony. 7 8 I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing 9 transcript is a true and correct transcript 10 of the testimony given by me at the time 11 and place specified hereinbefore. 12 13 14 15 16 17 CRAIG JALBERT 18 Subscribed and sworn to before me 19 this \\_\\_ day of \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ 20\\_ 20 21 22 NOTARY PUBLIC 23 24 25 1 2 EXHIBITS 3 JALBERT EXHlBHS EXHIBIT EXHIBIT PAGE 4 NUMBER DESCRIPTION 5 Exhibit 1 Notice of Deposition 10 6 Exhibit 2 E-mail Chain 32 7 Exhibit 3 E-mail Chain 35 8 Exhibit 4 Debtor's Application 47 9 Exhibit 5 Official Form 106Sum 93 10 Exhibit 6 Global Notes 111 11 Exhibit 7 E-mail Chain 129 12 Exhibit 8 E-mail Chain 131 13 Exhibit 9 E-mail Chain 139 14 Exhibit 10 E-mail Chain 147 15 (Exhibits retained by Court Reporter.) 16 17 INDEX 18 EXAMINATIONBY 19 MS. ARONSSON MR.HARBACH 20 MS. ARONSSON MR.HARBACH 21 MS. ARONSSON MR GOLDMAN 22 23 24 25 PAGE 5 100 103 153 154 165 Page 186 Page 187 1 2 3 CERTIFICATE STATEOFNEWYORK ) 4 : SS.: COUNTY OF KINGS ) 5 6 I, LENA YA LYNCH, a Notary Public for 7 and within the State of New York, do hereby 8 certify: 9 That the witness whose examination is 10 hereinbefore set forth was duly sworn and 11 that such examination is a true record of 12 the testimony given by that witness. 13 I further certify that I am not 14 related to any of the parties to this 15 action by blood or by marriage and that I 16 am in no way interested in the outcome of 17 this matter. 18 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto **Hsct~IM¥\"\"**  Ll:',l',f-\\. If-\\. LI l'<L11 22 23 24 25 Page 188\n\n85\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n48 (Pages 186 - 188)\n\n| દિદ                   | 86:10,22,24           | 132:20 134:13<br>161 | 24350<br>188:21       |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|\n|                       | 103:13 115:4,4,8      | 135:13,17 140:18     | 26<br>120:3,12        |\n| ર્દ<br>1:15,18 2:3,12 | 119:21 124:25         | 162:21               | 28<br>183:23          |\n| 0                     | 164:4 166:7,18        | 132:23<br>161,323    | 28th 72:9 129:23      |\n| 0001646<br>32:16      | 167:5,18 169:24       | 133:5                | 133:12 134:3          |\n| 00001649<br>35:10     | 111 -<br>187:10       | 165<br>187:21        | 140:14 152:23         |\n| 140:8<br>00001684     | 11:53<br>90:21        | 16th<br>132:17       | 154:21 155:11         |\n| 00001691<br>147:17    |                       |                      |                       |\n| 00001752<br>129:3     | 12 2:18 34:22         | 17<br>119:19,21      | 159:10                |\n| 02035<br>6:9          | 85:15 159:18          | 48:22 127:22<br>18   | 29<br>183:24          |\n| 2:18<br>06103         | 75:21 131:25<br>120   | 19<br>131:3          | 167:11<br>2:00        |\n|                       | 120-1 131:25          | 19,488<br>125:6,15   | 2:18<br>185:5.8       |\n| 06601<br>2:14         | 132:6                 | 17:5<br>1979         | 3                     |\n| 1                     | 122b<br>125:3,14,19   | 1983<br>17:8         | 23:23 35:8,12<br>3    |\n| 3:16 10:14,17<br>1    | 124<br>6:8            | 1987<br>17:10        | 96:25 97:4,8,13,24    |\n| 17:10 23:22 72:10     | 129<br>187:11         | 1999<br>165:24,24    | 115:13 116:21         |\n| 97:9 113:14,18        | 12:22 90:25           | 1:22<br>139:21       | 144:12 187:7          |\n| 114:14 118:3          | 19:8 42:12<br>13      | 1:28<br>140:4        | 3,850 96:5            |\n| 132:21 151:14         | 55:14 103:14          | 1:56<br>165:8        | 7:5,19 11:2,22<br>30  |\n| 155:17 157:6          | 126:5 146:19          | 1:58<br>165:12       | 107:6 144:4,6,14      |\n| 187:5                 | 152:7 153:14          | 94:19,22 95:8<br>1 a | 145:11 146:4,11       |\n| 133:25 147:10<br>10   | 154:11                | 1 b<br>95:11         | 166:4                 |\n| 147:15 159:19,23      | 13,611 152:8          | 2                    | 30th<br>2:4           |\n| 187:5,14              | 153:15,20             | 2<br>23:22 32:14,18  | 31<br>17:10 72:10     |\n| 100 2:18 142:15,18    | 131<br>187:12         | 33:2,4 41:6 97:13    | 74:24 77:7 121:16     |\n| 143:8 187:19          | 187:13<br>139         | 105:21 142:14        | 155:17,18 161:18      |\n| 10036<br>1:19 2:5,10  | 14<br>19:8 98:7 146:7 | 148:3 152:8 187:6    | 161:18                |\n| 44:7<br>100th         | 159-18                | 2.5<br>154:13        | 32<br>187:6           |\n| 101<br>6:9            | 147<br>187:14         | 20<br>45:8 186:19    | 16:17,22 45:13<br>341 |\n| 103<br>187:20         | 15<br>77:6 89:10      | 2019<br>79:18        | 45:14,17 46:14,15     |\n| 1069<br>94.71         | 97:25 145:4           | 2020<br>79:19        |                       |\n| 106sum<br>93:14       | 183:22,24             | 127:24<br>2021       | 46:19,24 47:8,12      |\n| 94:2 187:9            | 1 ਦੇਤੇ<br>187:20      |                      | 47:13,18 51:15        |\n| 109<br>132:22 135:18  | 154<br>187:21         | 1:10 3:5<br>2022     | 69:5 116:2 123:15     |\n| 140:17                | 15th<br>63:14 72.9    | 125:4 159:9,10       | 123:18 126:13         |\n| 109,827 133:7         | 125:4 129:23          | 188:19               | 127:10,18 174:15      |\n| 109,827.12 132:13     | 133:11 134:3          | 21<br>45:8 49:9 84:9 | 342<br>16:16          |\n| 10:17 1:11 3:4        | 140:14 152-23         | 92:21 107:14         | 17:13 176:6<br>35     |\n| 10:24                 | 154:21 155:11         | 22<br>43.9           | 187:7                 |\n| 11:15,19              | । ਦੇ ਰੇ-ਰੇ            | 22-50073 1:63:22     | 36<br>95:13 96:2,4,8  |\n| 11 1:5 21:2,4         | 16<br>96:18 105:18    | 22nd 3:4             | 96:16                 |\n| 32:11 55:3 70:3       | 126:5                 | 23<br>97.8           | 373<br>113:19 164:12  |\n| 74:19 81:6,11         |                       |                      |                       |\n\n[4 - advisor]\n\n| ব                                  | 95:17,19,24<br>61               | ਰੇਤੇ<br>187:9     | 172:24 173:9,19      |\n|------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-------------------|----------------------|\n| ব<br>47:24 48:3 91:4               | 62<br>95:15.16.17               | a                 | 173:23 179:2         |\n| 96:9,12,1797:13                    | 6:49<br>39:10                   | 1:11 3:4<br>a.m.  | accountants 21:5     |\n| 107:14 108:8                       | 108:8 130:23<br>6e              | 11:15,19 90:21    | 21:6,7,8             |\n| 113:13 117:4                       | 7                               | aaron 25:17,19,25 | accounting 22:21     |\n| 119:4 130:23                       | 7<br>1:18 2:4,9 81:6            | 26:10 31:4,7 32:9 | 63:21 168:17         |\n| 144:20 187:8                       | 86-25 02-18                     | 56:18 57:3 59:3,4 | 170:2 172:13         |\n| 7:18 138:18<br>40                  | 103:12 119:16,21                | 59:10,18 99:2,7   | accounts<br>69:21,22 |\n| 142:16                             | 128:24 129:11                   | 102:11 103:17     | accrual 70:20        |\n| 159:15,16<br>43                    | 133:16 135:14                   | 104:12,16 105:3   | 156:4,9,17,19        |\n| 43,655.44.<br>138:16               | 136:18 141:17                   | 105:13 106:7      | 163:2                |\n| 45<br>72:11                        | 142:16 144:14                   | 109:24 110:18     | accruals 156:25      |\n| 47<br>187:8                        | 176:18,20,22                    | 112:15 124:2      | 69:2<br>accrue       |\n| 5                                  | 181:22 187:11                   | 129:18 135:23     | 78:23,25<br>accrued  |\n|                                    | 6:19 7:16 169:2<br>70 -         | 139:8 143:14      | 79:6                 |\n| 93:12,15 108:8<br>ತ                | 176:25                          | 156:3 157:15      | accurate<br>10:6     |\n| 117:4 130:23                       | 7006<br>2:14                    | 160:16 181:4      | 136:11,12            |\n| 187:9,19                           | 100:20 111:6<br>77              | 182:3             | 10:2.9<br>accurately |\n| 50 6:19 7:14,18                    | 78<br>93:19                     | ability 9:25 10:5 | 136:24               |\n| 118:13 141:9,10                    | 8                               | able 53:7 78:6    | accustomed 53:9      |\n| 141:14 142:7,8,9                   |                                 | 79:11 136:13      | 19:15<br>act         |\n| 142:12 144:13                      | 8<br>1:10 119:21                | 138:3 144:25      | 4:8 188:15<br>action |\n| 145:11 176:25<br>500<br>21:3 126:6 | 120:3 131:16,21                 | 163:11            | 63:22<br>activity    |\n| રે0ર્સ                             | 134:7 135:11,18                 | absolutely 82:6   | 80:12                |\n| 75:13,17 76:2<br>505b<br>75:5      | 149:25 150:9                    | 167:3 180:3       | actual<br>109:17     |\n| 50th<br>44:6                       | 159:7 161:19,20                 | abundance 132:20  | 137:7 165:23         |\n| 140:17                             | 181:22 187:12                   | 142.21            | 173:3                |\n| 51.495.67<br>122:11<br>53          | 7:16 176:25<br>80<br>83<br>17:9 | accepted 102:23   | 85:21 140:16<br>add  |\n| રેર<br>94:22 95:23                 | 850<br>2:13                     | 115:23<br>access  | addition<br>155:25   |\n| 56<br>95:17,19                     | 87<br>17:10                     | 119:6 124:16      | additional 163.18    |\n| 58<br>95:24 96:2                   | 8th 3:5 127:24                  | accidently 125:13 | address 6:6.7.8      |\n|                                    | 159:5 188:19                    | account 37:25     | 169:4 180:10,19      |\n| 6                                  |                                 | 38:24 52:15 63:19 | addresses 162:20     |\n| 6<br>7:5 11:2,8,21,22              | ರ                               | 64:17 65:3 66:19  | administer 4:6       |\n| 97:24 98:7 111:4                   | ਹੈ<br>119:21 139:24             | 72:6 91:6,8 92:11 | administrative       |\n| 111:8 117:5                        | 140:7 146:20                    | 92:16 147:2       | 77:17 78:7,10        |\n| 119:16,18,21                       | 150:10 159:15                   | 172:20            | 81:8                 |\n| 181:22 187:10                      | 161:20 181:22                   | accountancy 17:8  | advising 22:20       |\n| 60 6:19 7:14 75:11                 | 187:13                          | accountant 18:16  | 53:261:11            |\n| 75:19 176:25                       | 48:10 82:17<br>90               | 70:22 80:6 168:4  | advisor              |\n| 183:25                             | 83:22 92:23                     | 169:9,10 172:23   | 21:5,6 34:7 36:23    |\n\n#### [advisor - aronsson]\n\n| 37:7 39:8 40:20       | allocations 145:25   | 121:17 122:12       | applicable<br>107:11 |\n|-----------------------|----------------------|---------------------|----------------------|\n| 41:20 43:2 48:9       | 12:20 38:23<br>allow | 130:2 148:21,23     | application 48:2,7   |\n| 48:21 49:5 70:22      | 65:2 87:11           | 151:18 163:11       | 48:18 49:2 175:21    |\n| 165:21,22 168:4       | allowed 80:12        | 178:20              | 181:7 187:8          |\n| advisors 62:4,5       | 81:20                | answered 34:20      | applies 53:17,22     |\n| affairs 14:6 55:20    | allows<br>82:15,17   | 148:25 149:4        | 103:22               |\n| 111:18 112:5          | 162:4 175:22         | 177:13 184:12       | apply 118:2          |\n| affect<br>184:19      | 89:7 125:3<br>amend  | 8:5.23<br>answers   | appointed 22:13      |\n| affidavit 48:25       | amended 125:19       | 130:20              | appreciate 35:4      |\n| 49.7                  | amendment 60:7       | anticipate 47:16    | approach 22:20       |\n| affiliated 42:3       | amendments           | 50:19 52:9 54:16    | appropriate 73:14    |\n| affiliations<br>4:13  | 55:21 112:6          | 55:6 59:25 61:19    | 113:8 114:7 153:9    |\n| 165:16<br>afternoon   | amount 13:9          | 61:21 63:25 67:16   | 70:16<br>approval    |\n| agent 90:291:7,20     | 81:22 96:5 118:12    | 76:4.24 79:21       | 62:10<br>approved    |\n| 91:21,24              | 133:8,9 134:17       | 106:15 157:13,17    | 64:22                |\n| 153:12 166:4<br>ago   | 137:25 138:12        | anticipated 60:5    | april 1:10 3:4,5     |\n| agree 3:14 59:12      | 159:11,15 183:17     | 60:11 62:9 68:15    | 137:22 159:5         |\n| 91:696:16 100:22      | amounts 51:22        | anticipates 78:16   | 188:19               |\n| 107:13,17             | 132:19 134:23        | anybody 83:24       | arbitration 171:4    |\n| agreed 143:8          | 138:4,9 156:14       | 145:16              | 12:11 22:12<br>areas |\n| 179:12                | analysis 68:6 83:4   | anymore 116:9       | 22:21                |\n| agreeing 179:9,25     | 84:3 87:19 89:18     | 142:11 164:15       | 19:4<br>arena        |\n| agreement 55:13       | 92:25 95:2 96:19     | 161:15<br>anyone's  | 170:8<br>argue       |\n| 61:8 67:25 78:6       | 105:9 107:20         | 41:14<br>anytime    | argument 117:21      |\n| 91:22 127:23,25       | 115:18 168:10        | 69:16<br>anyway     | 144.6                |\n| 175:13                | 168:14<br>analyzed   | anyway's 70:8       | aronsson 2:5 4:18    |\n| 128:8<br>agreements   | 80:18<br>analyzing   | 87:6 163:23 164:2   | 4:18 6:2,12 7:4,13   |\n| 128:16,18             | 82:4                 | apartment 101:6.9   | 10:12 11:12 12:9     |\n| ahead   40:8  122:20  | andersen<br>17:9     | 102:6 114:17        | 26:20,25 27:13       |\n| aircraft 97:15        | 167:15<br>annoys     | 115:2,7 146:21      | 29:18 32:11 34:21    |\n| 119:5                 | 8:20 9:11<br>answer  | 150:4               | 35:6 47:22 48:5      |\n| alive 114.5           | 9:19,21 24:21        | apologize 35:2      | 83:11 88:13 90:18    |\n| allegations 40:24     | 26:22,24 27:12       | 56:22 167:9         | 93:10,17 97:6        |\n| 81:5 156:7<br>alleged | 28:12 29:11,11,13    | apparently 28:19    | 99:22 103:5,6        |\n| alleging<br>83:18     | 29:17 36:11 38:17    | 174:21              | 111:2 128:22         |\n| alliance 2:3 4:20     | 53:16,21 54:12       | appear 100:20       | 129:7 130:5 131:2    |\n| 6:13 10:23            | 83:20 88:16          | appearance 4:16     | 131:5,9,23 139:18    |\n| allocated 141:16      | 101:20 104:18        | appearances<br>4:12 | 146:6 147:13         |\n| allocating<br>117:25  | 105:16 113:17        | applicability       | 154:17 164:14        |\n| 145:11<br>allocation  | 116:8,21 118:2       | 148:6,15            | 187:19,20,21         |\n| 152:3                 | 119:6 120:5          |                     |                      |\n\n[arrange - back]\n\n| 163:15<br>arrange    | 164:9 170:15,17      | 23:9 28:8 182:10     | 164:16 165:3         |\n|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|\n| arrangement          | 170:19 171:5         | attorneys 2:3,9,13   | 166:12,22 170:12     |\n| 54:20                | 178:17,17            | 14:16 15:6,16        | 170:22 177:25        |\n| arrive<br>136:8      | assigned 74:24       | 25:8 32:3 40:21      | 184:24               |\n| arthur<br>17:9       | assist 52:18 86:17   | 46:23 47:6 98:9      | authored 26:13       |\n| articulated 143:22   | assistance 45:11     | 98:21,24 99:6,14     | 27.9                 |\n| ascribe<br>144:2,15  | 55:18 61:9 73:16     | 104:24 106:20        | authorities 75:11    |\n| ascribed<br>118:17   | 80:17 82:8 84:23     | 109:23 142:3         | authorization 48:7   |\n| 141:25 149:24        | 85:18 86:6 88:21     | 147:3 178:3,3        | 48:19 49:3           |\n| ascribes<br>120:22   | 112:3 171:12,15      | attributed 138:4     | authorized 4:6       |\n| 121:7                | assisted 15:19       | audible 8:24         | automobiles          |\n| ascribing 142:22     | 51:9,12 109:14       | audio<br>3:12,12     | 115:16,16            |\n| asia 2:3 4:20 6:14   | 112:10,11 113:3      | audit<br>75:13,18,20 | available<br>135.2   |\n| 10:23                | 141:4                | auditing 22:21       | 137:16 160:22        |\n| aside   15:22 47:5   | associated 66:20     | 149:22<br>aught      | avoid 69:16          |\n| 67:7 83:17 161:9     | 117:2                | august 17:10         | avoidable<br>82:9    |\n| asked 36:8 47:19     | association<br>107.9 | aulet 2:10 5:3,3,12  | 83:2 84:13 171:17    |\n| 53:23 56:15,21,22    | 9:6 92:20<br>assume  | 9:17 12:4,6,24       | aware 25:17 30:19    |\n| 64:20 110:7          | 92:24 173:18         | 13:6 24:20 26:16     | 88:6 90:8, 10        |\n| 151:21 152:19        | assumed 150:13       | 26:23 27:11,13,16    | 114:24               |\n| 172:25 178:6         | 153:15 154:3         | 28:7 29:19 34:10     | awful 47:11          |\n| asking 13:17,19,20   | assuming 28:15       | 37:16 39:5 46:20     | 168:23,24            |\n| 34:14 67:18 98:22    | 50:23 72:13          | 57:22 58:18 61:4     | awfully<br>88:4      |\n| 101:2,18,21 102:2    | 118:21               | 64:14 66:13 77:4     | awhile<br>82.9       |\n| 105:15 148:12,17     | assumption           | 78:21 79:22 83:7     | b                    |\n| 149:12 151:4,5       | 143:10               | 83:13 84:25 85:8     | 2:65:21 6:5 7:5<br>0 |\n| 153:5 156:11,12      | attach<br>69:14      | 88:3,8,16 91:9       | 11:2,22 75:13,17     |\n| 156:13 162:22        | attached 79:16       | 92:2 93:5 95:9       | 76:2 94:17,20,21     |\n| 170:23 181:14        | 168:18               | 96:10 97:2 98:15     | 94:23 95:12 96:13    |\n| asks 108:11,17,18    | attachment 129.9     | 99:23 101:17         | 187-2                |\n| 113:14 115:13        | 129:21 130:8         | 102:8 103:24         | baby 19:25           |\n| 120:4 121:16         | 140:11               | 104:13 106:18        | babysitting 19:10    |\n| 122:11 151:14        | attempts 120:24      | 108:21 111:22        | bachelor 17:7        |\n| 166:9<br>aspects     | 45:13<br>attend      | 112:22 113:24        | back 7:18 11:19      |\n| assenting<br>37:9    | attended 45:14,16    | 118:4 122:18         | 13:20 27:6 29:24     |\n| assessment 101:14    | 47:11                | 126:3 127:7 129:4    | 34:3 41:5 49:13      |\n| assessments<br>153:7 | attending<br>4:11    | 129:25 130:16        | 55:12 69:25 71:16    |\n| asset<br>78:3        | 46:14                | 131:6,11 132:11      | 82:16 90:25 91:4     |\n| assets<br>88:2 94:2  | attention<br>105:20  | 133:18 141:18        | 95:17 103:7          |\n| 104:7 111:16         | attorney 2:17 4:17   | 148:20 149:7         | 111:23 112:13        |\n| 120:23 128:12        | 6:12 9:18 13:5       | 152:11 157:20        |                      |\n|                      |                      |                      | 114:4 127:11         |\n\n**[back** - **bullet]**\n\n| 131:7 140:4 159:7    | beach<br>122: 14        | 119:8 121:2              | bridgeport<br>1:3     |\n|----------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------------|\n| 159:21 162: 10       | bearing<br>76:9,9       | big<br>34:4, 15, 16      | 2:143:21              |\n| 165: 12 167: 14      | bears<br>32: 15 140:8   | 35:20 52:23              | brief 90:22           |\n| 173:2 181: 15        | beast<br>42:18          | biggest<br>19:4          | briefly<br>14:21      |\n| background<br>17:2   | beautiful<br>164:20     | bill<br>45: 19 72: 12,23 | 65:24 128:5           |\n| 153:6 159:21,22      | beginning<br>4: 16      | 73:6                     | bring<br>163:24       |\n| balance<br>69:20     | 180: 12                 | billed<br>67:13,14,16    | broad<br>7:21 22:9    |\n| bank<br>37:25 52: 15 | behalf<br>12:23 21:7    | bills<br>19: 14 55:3     | broadly<br>109:5      |\n| 64:21,24 65:6        | 21:8 38:21108:11        | 72:3 122:4 146:24        | 115: 13 132:8         |\n| 69: 18 91:6, 16      | 108: 15 117:6           | binders<br>69: 14        | brought<br>40:3,20    |\n| 158:7                | 118: 14,23 130:24       | birnbaum<br>2: 17        | 167: 17 168:3, 19     |\n| bank's<br>91: 18     | 132:17 133:12           | bit<br>14:20 17:2        | brown<br>2:8 5:4      |\n| bankruptcies         | 144: 10 145: 15         | 21:25 24:3 46:17         | 15:2123:10,16         |\n| 164:5                | 152:23 155: 17          | 139: 16                  | 24:6,8, 18 25:8       |\n| bankruptcy<br>1:2    | 184: 11                 | biweekly<br>66:25        | 26:5,6, 10 30:9       |\n| 3 :20 20: 11,22      | behest<br>182: 16       | blood<br>188: 15         | 31:20 32:3 38: 10     |\n| 21:13,24 22:6,11     | believe<br>24:4 45:2,5  | blue<br>131: 13          | 38: 12 39:2, 16       |\n| 32:25 38: 15 39: 19  | 50: 18 72: 14 99: 19    | bookkeepers              | 43:23 49:24 56:13     |\n| 39:22 44:6,7,7       | 100:7 144:21            | 52:16 53:14,18,19        | 57:4 58:25 59:6       |\n| 51:2 64:25 74: 13    | 160: 12 162:21          | 53:20,25 66: 19          | 59: 10,17 64:20       |\n| 75:4 77: 15,24       | 167:4 175:7             | books<br>82:8 84: 12     | 83: 18 98:25 99:6     |\n| 80:4,13 81:2,23      | believes<br>27: 19      | 84: 14,18 92: 18         | 102: 11,17 103: 18    |\n| 82: 15 83:23 90:3    | belong<br>102:23        | 171:16,20 172:17         | 103: 18 104: 10, 16   |\n| 115:2 168:7,22       | 119:23 160:7            | boston<br>17:6,6         | 104: 17 105 :7, 12    |\n| 177:17 178:11        | belonged<br>101:15      | 18:16                    | 106:6 109:24          |\n| base<br>59:9         | 102:6 103:14            | bottle<br>34:25 42:8     | 112: 14 123 :25       |\n| based<br>27: 16,21   | belonging<br>104:8      | 164:21                   | 126:7,14 139:7        |\n| 28:23 63:5 72:25     | ben<br>13:5 14:16,21    | bottom<br>49:11          | 156:2 157: 15         |\n| 87: 14 158:5 159:2   | 24:5                    | 105: 19 132:9            | 175:17 178:7          |\n| basic<br>129: 16     | beneficiary             | 145: 19 162:3            | 181:3,5               |\n| basically<br>37:9    | 121:25                  | bought<br>101:23         | buckets<br>19:3       |\n| 39:11155:13          | benefit<br>124:3        | 117: 18                  | 21:19 155:14          |\n| basis<br>37: 14,21   | benefitting<br>149: 18  | box<br>2:14              | budget<br>61: 10,23   |\n| 66:25 69:7,8         | best<br>13 :2 28:9 52:4 | brain<br>93:8            | 61:24 62:2            |\n| 73:10 80:11 81:7     | 56:10 60:9,14           | break<br>9:9, 12 85:9    | budgeting<br>42: 10   |\n| 81:8,8 90:7          | 137:2 145:20            | 85: 15 139: 19           | 63:16 86:15           |\n| 123:12 143:9,23      | 184: 13                 | breakdown                | budgets<br>42: 13, 13 |\n| 145:9                | better<br>86:23         | 160:10                   | build<br>78:2         |\n| bates<br>32: 15 35:9 | 103:25 171:14           | breakdowns               | building<br>113: 16   |\n| 129:2 140:8          | beyond<br>14: 13        | 163: 19                  | bullet<br>55:17 61:7  |\n| 147: 17              | 38: 18 53: 13 116:7     |                          | 92: 19 112:3          |\n|                      |                         |                          |                       |\n\n85\n\n[bullet - certain]\n\n| 114:16 171:10           | 96:197:198:1        | callable<br>144:5     | 175:17 176:5              |\n|-------------------------|---------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|\n| business 6:7 22:10      | 99:1 100:1 101:1    | called 5:21 20:18     | 177:3,6,18,23             |\n| 41:21,24,25 42:8        | 102:1 103:1 104:1   | 41:8 89:22            | 178:5,5,23 179:10         |\n| 42:11,22 43:3           | 105:1 106:1 107:1   | calling 145:7         | 179:13 182:12             |\n| 167:19 178:21,22        | 108:1 109:1 110:1   | calls 25:11.15        | cases 21:2.4 40:16        |\n| 184:20                  | 111:1 112:1 113:1   | 58:24 93:6 143:15     | 41:25 64:10 90:5          |\n| businesses 19:5         | 114:1 115:1 116:1   | 178:23,25 181:19      | 92:8 161 :24              |\n| 162:7<br>button         | 117:1 118:1 119:1   | 8:11<br>camera        | 163:10 164:11             |\n| 117:23<br>buying        | 120:1 121:1 122:1   | cancelled<br>158:7    | 166:7,18 169:14           |\n| C                       | 123:1 124:1 125:1   | capabilities<br>18:2  | 172:6 176:14              |\n|                         | 126:1 127:1 128:1   | capital 126:8,20      | 177:17                    |\n| 2:2 3:1 4:1 5:1,21<br>C | 129:1 130:1 131:1   | 179:14,15,25          | 36:14 37:10<br>cash       |\n| 6:17:18:19:1            | 132:1 133:1 134:1   | 116:3,17 117:9<br>car | 37:19 42:12,13            |\n| 10:1 11:1 12:1          | 135:1 136:1,7       | care 67:6 79:4        | 61:10 62:12,13,23         |\n| 13:1 14:1 15:1          | 137:1 138:1 139:1   | career 47:12          | 63:15,15,22 69:9,9        |\n| 16:1 17:1 18:1          | 140:1 141:1 142:1   | 97:14 117:19<br>cars  | 69:21 78:18 79:2          |\n| 19:1 20:1 21:1          | 143:1 144:1 145:1   | 1:6 3:22 6:17<br>case | 79:3 86:18 87:13          |\n| 22:1 23:1 24:1          | 146:1 147:1 148:1   | 15:24 33:21 41:19     | 121:19,22,24              |\n| 25:1 26:1 27:1          | 149:1 150:1 151:1   | 41:22,23,24 42:19     | 152:21 157:5,10           |\n| 28:1 29:1 30:1          | 152:1 153:1 154:1   | 43:3,4 44:3,13,14     | 171:6                     |\n| 31:1 32:1 33:1          | 155:1 156:1 157:1   | 48:10 49:15 50:22     | catch 88:25 89:2          |\n| 34:1 35:1 36:1          | 158:1 159:1 160:1   | 50:23 51:2,5,20       | 89:14,15 156:16           |\n| 37:1 38:1 39:1          | 161:1 162:1 163:1   | 52:10 54:17 55:8      | 7:21                      |\n| 40:1 41:1 42:1          | 164:1 165:1 166:1   | 55:11,1656:10         | categories                |\n| 43:1 44:1 45:1          | 167:1 168:1 169:1   |                       | 118:24 136:2,23<br>137:25 |\n| 46:1 47:1 48:1          |                     | 59:7 60:9,14          |                           |\n| 49:1 50:1 51:1          | 170:1 171:1 172:1   | 61:22 62:9,19         | categorization            |\n| 52:1 53:1 54:1          | 173:1 174:1 175:1   | 64:2 66:5 67:4,17     | 137.9                     |\n| 55:1 56:1 57:1          | 176:1 177:1 178:1   | 68:12,21 69:2         | categorized               |\n| 58:1 59:1 60:1          | 179:1 180:1 181:1   | 70:4,7,9,11 71:5,6    | 155:24                    |\n| 61:162:1663:1           | 182:1 183:1 184:1   | 71:19 73:11,25        | category<br>138:4         |\n| 64:1 65:1 66:1          | 185:1 186:2 188:2   | 74:2,7,11,19 75:9     | 89:12<br>cats             |\n| 67:1 68:1 69:1          | 188:2               | 75:14,22 76:22        | caution 46:21 83:7        |\n| 70:1 71:1 72:1          | calculates<br>69:10 | 77:21 78:5,25         | 132:20 142:21             |\n| 73:1 74:1,9,10          | calculation 151:3   | 79:5 81:6 82:24       | caveat<br>89:3            |\n| 75:1 76:1 77:1          | calender 72:7       | 84:7 86:4.25 90:6     | 26:12 27:10<br>cc'd       |\n| 78:1 79:1 80:1          | call 19:10 31:18    | 93:20 107:24          | cell<br>3:10 167:8        |\n| 81:1 82:1 83:1          | 45:18 79:11 102:4   | 111:5 131:24          | cellphone 176:10          |\n| 84:1 85:1 86:1          | 104:25 163:4.7.9    | 164:7 167:18,25       | cellular 3:8              |\n| 87:1 88:1 89:1          | 166:5,16 170:18     | 169:8,24 170:9        | 87:18<br>cents            |\n| 90:1 91:1 92:1          | 178:3               | 172:10,10,13,15       | certain 40:17 94:3        |\n| 93:1 94:1,17 95:1       |                     | 172:15 173:12         | 113:22 174:6              |\n|                         |                     |                       |                           |\n\n85\n\n| certainly<br>22:3      | 158: 10                 | clients<br>18:25 19: 13 | 70:23 156:6 157:3    |\n|------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|----------------------|\n| 62:20 72:20 84:3       | checked<br>64:24        | close<br>70:5           | 165:18 175:20        |\n| 91: 11 102: 14         | 141:5                   | closure<br>75:15        | common<br>158:25     |\n| 106: 19 109:8          | checks<br>66:20         | clothes<br>103: 12      | communicate 26:9     |\n| 112: 10 124:7          | chinese<br>174:22       | club<br>122: 13         | 30: 11 57: 11 99:4   |\n| 140:25 166:8           | chooses<br>76:6         | code<br>75:480:13,14    | 99:5                 |\n| certification<br>17:20 | cia<br>18: 13           | 82:15                   | communicated         |\n| 17:23 18:9             | cira<br>18:7,14,15      | cohn<br>2:17            | 58:16 98:24          |\n| certifications         | circulate<br>32:4,8     | collateral<br>42: 14    | communicates         |\n| 18: 12                 | circulated<br>88:7      | colleague<br>45:5, 15   | 30:13                |\n| certified<br>17:23     | circumstances           | 100:25 129:20           | communicating        |\n| 18:4,6 165: 19         | 15:25 33: 13 60:6       | 146: 14 181: 18         | 104:19               |\n| 166: 15                | 73: 14 114:8            | colleagues<br>13 :7     | communications       |\n| certify<br>186:4,8     | cite<br>164:7           | 30: 18 31:24            | 65:14,19 180:4       |\n| 188:8,13               | citizens<br>65 :6       | collect<br>13:13 177:9  | 181: 16              |\n| chain<br>32: 17 35: 11 | city<br>58:8 146:22     | college<br>17:6,6       | company<br>89:21     |\n| 38:6 103:21 104:9      | civil<br>11 :2          | 18:16                   | 169:13               |\n| 129: 10 131: 15        | claim<br>52:20 80: 19   | column<br>136:7         | comparative          |\n| 139:23 147:9           | 80:24 81:3,5,16,21      | combine<br>72:7         | 183:19               |\n| 151:14 187:6,7,11      | 168:13,16               | come<br>50:23 53: 14    | compare<br>110:6     |\n| 187:12,13,14           | claimed<br>125:5        | 54:2171:1674:18         | compared<br>110:6    |\n| change<br>146: 11      | claims<br>52:24 54:8    | 74:20 169: 14           | complete<br>69: 18   |\n| changed<br>139:4       | 81:7,10,12,25 82:5      | 172:6 173:14            | completely<br>74:5   |\n| 146:4                  | 82:11,18 88:2           | 175:9,11                | 108:3 168:2          |\n| changes<br>43 :24      | 90:2 168:10,14          | comes<br>19:15          | compliance<br>42:24  |\n| 44:10                  | 171:18 175:15           | 100:23 118:8            | complicated<br>43:4  |\n| changing<br>139:3      | clarification<br>96: 15 | 167:14                  | 52:23                |\n| 144:22 153:8           | 97:3                    | comfortable<br>176:4    | compound<br>139:2    |\n| chapter<br>1:5 21:2,3  | clarity<br>119:20       | coming<br>34:25         | comprehensive        |\n| 55:3 70:3 74: 19       | cleaning<br>145:5, 15   | 62:23 78: 18 142:5      | 89:6                 |\n| 81:6,6, 11 86: 10,22   | clear<br>24: 12 28: 18  | 162: 10                 | computers<br>169:5   |\n| 86:24,25 115:3,4,8     | 39: 14 98: 10           | comley<br>2:12 5:7      | concerning<br>12:21  |\n| 164:4 166:7, 18        | 101:21                  | 165: 17                 | concerns<br>142:25   |\n| 167:5,18 169:23        | clearly<br>56: 18 79:2  | comment<br>36:21,21     | 144:11               |\n| 176: 17,20,22          | 141:3                   | 37:8,8,9                | concluded<br>185: 10 |\n| charge<br>160:5        | clerical<br>55 :5, 7    | comments<br>112:25      | concludes<br>185:6   |\n| chart<br>136: 18       | client<br>4:23 5:2      | commercial<br>70:7      | conclusion<br>28:20  |\n| 137:14 153:3           | 30:8 34:5,6 35:21       | commission<br>157:9     | concurred<br>39: 11  |\n| check<br>73:3 110:18   | 36:23 37:6 38:3         | committee<br>2: 13      | concurring<br>37: 12 |\n| 134:23 138:8           | 39:8                    | 5:8 20: 19 21:4,5       | 38:4                 |\n| 152:21 158:7,10        |                         | 62:3 66:23 70:21        |                      |\n\n**[condition** - **covered]**\n\n| condition<br>9:25     | 119:18 121:11           | controller<br>169: 13  | 43: 14 62:3,4         |\n|-----------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|\n| condo<br>107: 10      | 124:5 125:23            | conversation<br>8: 17  | 70:21 97:12,18,20     |\n| confer<br>158: 10,25  | 128: 11 134:21          | conversations<br>3:8   | 98:12,14 99:19        |\n| confident<br>175:3,5  | 135:20 154: 19          | 27: 17 44:5 46:22      | 100: 17 124:8         |\n| confirm<br>65 :2      | 155:2 157: 18           | 47:6 102: 15,16        | 135:22 136:5          |\n| 86: 10,21 114:4       | conservative            | converted<br>70: 12    | 141:3 158: 11         |\n| 136: 11 158:24        | 143:25 144:9            | copies<br>69: 18       | 169:19 171:14         |\n| 172:8                 | 145:21                  | copy<br>8: 14 94:22    | 172:2,14 180:11       |\n| confirmation          | consider<br>157:22      | 100:21 158:7           | 180:14,24 181:4       |\n| 20:17                 | 167:20                  | copyrights<br>120:4,6  | 182:19                |\n| confirmed<br>70: 12   | consideration           | 120:14,17              | counsel's<br>182: 16  |\n| 115:5 143:14          | 141:22                  | corp<br>74:10          | count<br>118: 15      |\n| 154:4                 | consistent<br>183:13    | corporate<br>74:7      | countries<br>42:6     |\n| conflicts<br>24: 12   | constituency            | corporation<br>74:7    | country<br>42:22      |\n| confusion<br>69: 17   | 21: 11, 13              | 74:9, 10 75:23         | county<br>188:4       |\n| congress<br>19: 18    | consultation<br>98: 17  | correct<br>58: 19      | couple<br>60: 14 92:7 |\n| conjecture<br>122: 19 | 126:2 142:3             | 62:17 63:10 72:13      | 99:21 110: 13         |\n| connecticut<br>1 :2   | consulted<br>64:21      | 76:23 94:25 95:25      | 147:20 164: 18        |\n| 2:14,18 3:2117:5      | 138:18,18               | 97:23 102:25           | 176:23,23             |\n| 76:13,14,19           | consulting<br>88:21     | 107:25 108:25          | course<br>30:21       |\n| 113:20 148:5,14       | contact<br>25 :3 30: 19 | 109:2 114:12           | 52: 19 56: 16 62:8    |\n| 149:17 173:19         | 180: 13                 | 121: 12 134:8,19       | 70:24 156:7,8         |\n| 176: 15               | contacted<br>23 :6,8    | 149: 15 152:20         | 169:22 181:7          |\n| connection<br>11:5    | contacts<br>25:4        | 153:21156:19           | courses<br>17: 15     |\n| 15:6 24: 19 33:21     | contained<br>59:22      | 171:20 174:25          | court<br>1:2 3:20 4:4 |\n| 34:8 36:4,9,25        | 71: 14 107:21           | 175:2 180:21           | 5:10,19 6:15,25       |\n| 39:2,18 43:2,25       | 136:24 163:19           | 186:9                  | 8:1110:13 13:10       |\n| 46:3,10,18 50:14      | contention<br>28:3      | corrected<br>134:4     | 32: 12 35:6 40: 12    |\n| 50:25 51:6,20         | contents<br>101:8       | 134: 12                | 45:3 47:22 55:2       |\n| 57: 16 60:2 61: 15    | contested<br>6:23       | correctly<br>148:22    | 62: 10 78:9 87: 12    |\n| 61: 19 63:9 64: 12    | context<br>20: 12 22:6  | 149:4                  | 93: 10 101: 10        |\n| 66:1168:15 73:19      | continue<br>3:1374:8    | cost<br>117:2,25       | 111:2 128 :22         |\n| 76:25 78: 17 80:21    | 74:16 130:6             | 118:10,13,18           | 131:19 147:13         |\n| 83:5,19 84:14,19      | continued<br>16: 16     | 141:25 142:6,22        | 171:13 175:21,22      |\n| 84:23 85:21 86:2      | 103:4 153:10            | 142:23 144:3           | 187: 15               |\n| 87:20 88: 15 89: 19   | 154: 16                 | 145:3                  | cover<br>16:25 107:3  |\n| 92: 15 96:20 97: 11   | continues<br>68:21      | costly<br>89:6         | 128:13                |\n| 97: 16 98:6,22        | 150:2,24                | costs<br>144:4         | covered<br>13: 11     |\n| 103:8 104:7 106:3     | continuing<br>17: 17    | counsel<br>4: 10 5:4,7 | 76:20 83:14 85:19     |\n| 107:23 109: 11        | 137:20                  | 9:12,2113:6,15         | 89:8 103:9 119:17     |\n| 110: 11 112:21        |                         | 25:21,24 30:3          | 154: 18               |\n|                       |                         |                        |                       |\n\n85\n\n[cpe - description]\n\n| 17:15,16<br>сре       | 147:11               | 120:22 121:7       | deducting 79:21        |\n|-----------------------|----------------------|--------------------|------------------------|\n| craig 1:14 3:17 6:5   | dated 127:24         | 122:8,17 124:18    | deferred 78:3          |\n| 48:25 151:4 185:7     | daughter 141:23      | 125:3,5,12,18      | defers<br>ી રેરે ને તે |\n| 186:15                | 143:2                | 126:23 130:25      | define<br>82:19        |\n| 161:25<br>crazy       | david 2:64:21        | 132:17 133:13      | definition 72:5        |\n| create<br>72:23 157:6 | 100:4 103:9          | 141:5 142:5,21,23  | 101:5                  |\n| 86:13<br>created      | day 39:9 44:24       | 143:5,12,15 144:3  | degree 17:7 18:16      |\n| 133:22                | 45:14,16 46:24       | 145:18 147:2       | 45:13 179:5            |\n| creator<br>141:19,20  | 47:8 51:13,14,15     | 148:13 150:14.18   | 18:19<br>degrees       |\n| creditor<br>42:15     | 52:4,4 63:16         | 152:24 155:15      | delaware 176:14        |\n| 47:14 81:5,13,16      | 132:18 155:17        | 156:6,23 167:6     | 14:19<br>delayed       |\n| creditor's 2:13 5:8   | 169:21 182:22,23     | 168:5,25 169:19    | department 19:22       |\n| 165:17                | 185:2 186:19         | 171:16 172:2,14    | 19:22 20:7 22:2        |\n| creditors 20:19,19    | 188:19               | 172:19 174:12.19   | 64:23                  |\n| 21:9 67:2 86:16       | days   14:25 72:11   | 178:14 180:11,14   | depend 52:11           |\n| 86:23 171:6           | 75:12,19,21 82:17    | 180:16,24 181:4    | depending 42:8         |\n| 52:7<br>crises        | 82:21 83:22 92:23    | 183:3 184:11       | 51:23 78:24 79:4       |\n| 138.8<br>cross        | 145:4 183:22,24      | debtor's 38:23     | 158:19                 |\n| crosschecked          | deadline 81:10,13    | 47:25 48:18 49:2   | depends 78:18          |\n| 136:22                | deal<br>80:6         | 58:9,11,13 62:4,18 | 168:12 171:25          |\n| cumulative 69:7       | 167:22,23,24<br>debt | 63:4 74:20 79:8    | depicted 136:24        |\n| 134:17,18             | debtor    1:7 5:5    | 79:20 87:15,25     | deposition 1:14        |\n| 88:14<br>curious      | 16:9,13,15,20,23     | 106:15 108:10,19   | 3:12,17,23 6:22,25     |\n| 88:17<br>current      | 20:11 21:5,6         | 108:22 111:16      | 7:6 10:16,24           |\n| 118:20                | 25:16,22 36:15       | 123:20 141:23      | 11:22 13:4,21          |\n| currently 18:21       | 37:11,20,25 38:3,9   | 144:10 164:9       | 14:23 15:7,17          |\n| 88:7 122:9 134:16     | 38:22 39:15 42:16    | 166:9,19 167:15    | 16:5,10,11 27:25       |\n| 171:21                | 45:13 52:14,25       | 171:20 172:16      | 28:20 41:12 45:23      |\n| 155:6,10<br>cycle     | 54:19,25 57:10,10    | 175:19 187:8       | 49:21 137:20           |\n| d                     | 57:12 58:16 62:15    | debtors 20:18 42:4 | 187.5                  |\n| て<br>81:14 109:22     | 70:22,22 76:6,8,12   | 48:6               | depositions<br>40:14   |\n| 128:3 186:2           | 76:21 77:3 78:19     | december 74:24     | 42:9<br>deposits       |\n| 187:17                | 79:23,25 80:4        | 77:7 161:18        | describe 46:17         |\n| 162:5,7<br>data       | 82:8 84:12,14        | 103:10<br>decide   | 58:20 155:8            |\n| date<br>1:10,16 10:18 | 88:23 94:4 101:8     | decision 37:12     | described 70:14        |\n| 32:19 35:13 44:20     | 101:11,16 108:16     | 39:12 87:14        | 103:21 104:10          |\n| 48:4 67:19,20         | 111:18 113:18        | 102:13 141:4       | 128:5 136:2            |\n| 71:4 75:12 86:3       | 114:3 115:15,21      | declaration 62:19  | 142:10 169:25          |\n| 87:20 93:15 111:9     | 116:5,6,10,12        | declared 40:18     | description 114:7      |\n| 129:12 131:17         | 117:7 118:5,14,16    | deductible 78:2    | 138:11 187:4           |\n| 137:15 139:25         | 118:24 120:15,16     | 79:2,7             |                        |\n|                       |                      |                    |                        |\n\n**[descriptions** - **due]**\n\n| descriptions          | 70: 16,25 91 :6,8      | 106:10,21126:11        | 109:7, 12 129:5,8     |\n|-----------------------|------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|\n| 136:10                | 92: 11, 15             | 139:13 143:13          | 182:25                |\n| designated<br>12:2,7  | direct<br>29: 10, 16   | 155:22 165: 10         | dog<br>103: 13        |\n| designation           | 105:20 130:2           | discussions<br>43: 13  | dogs<br>89:12         |\n| 165:23,25             | directed<br>28: 10     | 43: 15 106:5           | doing<br>7: 18 22: 18 |\n| detail<br>145:8       | 88:23 182:3            | 113:11137:21           | 51:8 60:2 61: 19      |\n| 160: 19,23            | directly<br>104: 15    | dismissed<br>70: 12    | 61:2178:1788:17       |\n| detailed<br>27: 15    | 143:11                 | disparity<br>164:8     | 91:16 157:17          |\n| 160:10,13             | director<br>51 :4,4    | displayed<br>161:4     | 162: 13 176:6         |\n| details<br>135:24     | disagree<br>81: 17, 19 | dispute<br>28:3 29: 19 | 182:13                |\n| 163:6,18              | 170:3,4                | 29:20 130:6            | doj<br>161: 10        |\n| determination         | disbursed<br>155: 16   | distinct<br>74:5, 14   | dollar<br>154:14      |\n| 38:5 39:3, 12         | disbursement<br>62:9   | distribution<br>136:8  | dollars<br>96:5       |\n| 87:17 101:10          | 72:5 117:17            | 136:14 138:13          | 125: 15 126:8         |\n| 137:5                 | disbursements          | distributions          | 132:21,22 133:23      |\n| determine<br>87: 13   | 52: 17 54:4, 15, 16    | 139:6                  | 133:24 146:20         |\n| 156:3                 | 54:24 63: 16,20        | district<br>1 :2 3 :20 | 154: 12 159: 16, 16   |\n| determined<br>72:25   | 67:2 68:22 73:2        | divided<br>141: 13     | 159: 18 164: 12       |\n| determining           | 77:14 86:19 91:14      | division<br>1 :3 3 :21 | 177:2 183 :24,25      |\n| 178: 15               | 91: 15 92: 15 137:8    | docket<br>48: 10       | double<br>73:2        |\n| develop<br>67:5       | 157: 10 184: 16        | 93: 19 97:7 100:20     | 110: 18 134:23        |\n| developed<br>183:20   | disclaimers            | 111:6 131:24           | doubt<br>114:20       |\n| developing<br>87:24   | 111: 15                | document<br>10:20      | draft<br>88:7 98: 14  |\n| development<br>86:7   | disclose<br>46:21      | 32:14,15 33:3          | 107:23 114: 19,20     |\n| difference<br>38:8    | 83:9,16                | 35:9, 16 48:6, 12, 15  | 126:13 130:15         |\n| 41:23 108:6           | disclosed<br>84:6      | 48:23,24 55:12         | 136:17 140:24         |\n| different<br>41:21    | 161:4,5                | 93:18,21 94:11         | 141: 16 142: 15       |\n| 42:18 51:22 52:2      | disclosing<br>29:7     | 96:25 100:20           | drafted<br>31: 19     |\n| 77:21 80:5 108:2      | 118:22 182: 14         | 101: 19 105: 19        | 43:11,16 112:25       |\n| 108:3,16 144:18       | disclosure<br>68 :25   | 107:21 109:4           | drafter<br>13 8: 17   |\n| differing<br>51 :22   | discovery<br>40: 13    | 111:5, 11 112:9,21     | drafting<br>31 :22    |\n| difilippo<br>2:22 4:2 | discreet<br>89:4       | 127: 18 128:25         | 46:2,5 98: 13         |\n| digit<br>110:15,15    | discuss<br>8: 13       | 131 :24,25 135: 10     | 103:10 105:22         |\n| digital<br>120: 19    | 147: 19                | 140:9 141:21           | 112: 11 124:5         |\n| diligence<br>179:8    | discussed<br>85 :23    | 146:10 147:16,19       | drafts<br>32:4 62:21  |\n| dip<br>14:9 28:24     | 94:5 98:20 106: 19     | 147:21 154:22          | driving<br>161:24     |\n| 54:20 61:22 62: 14    | 127: 15 130:4          | 155:3                  | 172:13,14             |\n| 63:19,23 64:2,4,10    | 143:7                  | documents<br>13:9      | drop<br>41:10         |\n| 64:16 65:3,11,15      | discussing<br>132:3    | 13: 13,16,17,23        | due<br>44:23 45:7     |\n| 65: 19,22,24 66:3,6   | discussion<br>11: 17   | 27:22 57:8,15,16       | 55:3 69: 11 70: 19    |\n| 66: 15 68:2,20        | 15:24 99: 15           | 57:20 105:11           | 75:7 81:22 179:8      |\n|                       |                        |                        |                       |\n\n85\n\n[dues - exactly]\n\n| dues<br>107:10      | effectuating<br>63:20 | engagement 23:5      | essentially<br>61:2  |\n|---------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|\n| 5:22 186:5<br>duly  | 91:14                 | 23:7 24:2,10,19      | 158:14               |\n| 188:10              | efficient<br>23:8     | 25:6 26:4,11         | 62.2<br>establish    |\n| duties 41:20 43:2   | efficiently 52:5      | 30:12,14 31:16,22    | 81:21 156:17         |\n| 43:20,21 50:24      | eight<br>166:3        | 32:5 34:9 36:5,9     | established 74:13    |\n| 55:691:25 93:4      | either 42:17 81:5     | 40:5 43:12 44:2      | estate 42:20 53:4    |\n| e                   | 101:9 103:16          | 45:2 46:3,5 50:15    | 54:21 62:25 68:25    |\n| 2:2,2 5:21 6:5<br>e | 104:22 110:17         | 51:25 52:2 55:15     | 70:24 73:17 74:3     |\n|                     | elapsed<br>39:11      | 55:16 84:15,19       | 74:14.14.18.21.23    |\n| 13:11,23 14:2,4     | elect 74:25 75:2,13   | 171:10 180:2         | 74:23 76:9,10,14     |\n| 15:20 26:9,13,13    | 75:18                 | engagements          | 77:20,24 78:19       |\n| 27:9,10 30:19       | election<br>19:18     | 166:17 177:16        | 79:24 80:4,7,8,10    |\n| 32:17 34:3 35:11    | electricity<br>107:11 | english 127:13       | 81:23 83:3 94:22     |\n| 35:19 37:18 38:6    | 15:19<br>electronic   | 174:21               | 107:6 113:19.22      |\n| 39:7.9 41:17        | electronics<br>100:24 | ensure 73:12         | 114:4 147:6 157:2    |\n| 49:22 59:11 81:14   | 119:17                | 136:23               | 175:9,11 181:10      |\n| 99:19 104:23,24     | eliminate<br>131:13   | entire 79:14,14,18   | estate's<br>87:25    |\n| 106:9 112:24        | 150.21                | entirely 79:6        | estates<br>74:4      |\n| 117:5 129:9,10,15   | eliminated<br>150:20  | 138:23 139:6         | estimate 105:21      |\n| 129:17,24 130:11    | 150:22                | 157:10 172:9         | estimated 71:13      |\n| 131:15 132:22       | emphatically          | entities 42:3        | 106:12               |\n| 139:23 141:2        | 181:2 183:7           | 179:19               | 73:11<br>estimates   |\n| 147:9 151 : 13      | empirical 154:9       | entitled 1:16 48:6   | estimating 73:7      |\n| 152:9 155:16,25     | employ 14:8 38:21     | entity 74:5 103:15   | 97:14<br>etcetera    |\n| 160:18 162:19       | 48:8,19 49:3          | 114:24 119:25        | 120:5                |\n| 163:8 169:4         | 90:11,17 168:6        | 126:22 154:14        | evaluation<br>114:13 |\n| 173:15 180:8,10     | employed 18:21        | 183:10,10 184:4      | 68:2<br>event        |\n| 180:19,22 181:21    | 36:15 37:11,20        | entries<br>148:7,16  | 103:21<br>events     |\n| 181:25 182:2,4      | 38:9,11,16 90:14      | equitable 113:15     | 104:10               |\n| 186:2 187:2,6,7,11  | 91:25                 | erroneous 125:23     | everybody 60:21      |\n| 187:12,13,14,17     | employee<br>28:17     | 159:11               | 75:9 93:7 156:8      |\n| 188:2,2             | employees 28:22       | erroneously<br>125:5 | 175:18               |\n| earlier 68:10 94:5  | 29:2,5 42:5,23        | 125:14               | everybody's 45:2     |\n| 100:7               | 50:20 182:11          | error                | 69:8                 |\n| easy 73:2           | employment 38:14      | 161:7 184:13         | everyone's 46:2      |\n| edits<br>135:15,16  | 89:7,8                | 136:4<br>errors      | 147:3 162:15         |\n| 140:23              | endeavor 124:10       | 91:7,20,21<br>escrow | evidence 87:11       |\n| educated<br>155:22  | 183:23<br>ended       | 91:22,24             | exactly 53:7 58:9    |\n| education 17:18     | engaged 20:11,15      | esq 2:5,6,6,10,15    | 115:4 117:4          |\n| educational 17:3    | 20:16 24:23 166:6     | 2:19                 | 130:22 159:13        |\n| effectively<br>38:4 | 179:10                |                      | 181.25               |\n|                     |                       |                      |                      |\n\n| examination<br>5:25   | expectation           | 27:21<br>expose          | fear 28:5,6         |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------|---------------------|\n| 100:2 103:4           | 106:22                | extent 22:12 60:5        | feasibility<br>86:8 |\n| 153:10 154:16         | 33:5,13<br>expected   | 65:4 78:3 83:8           | 87:3,7,9            |\n| 165:14 185:9          | 123:20                | 113:6 137:12             | feasible 87:16      |\n| 187:18 188:9,11       | 136:18<br>expense     | 143:17,18 146:23         | february 45:8       |\n| examined 5:24         | ી રેજેઃ 8             | 100:21<br>extra          | 63:14 69:3 72:9,9   |\n| 101:3<br>example      | expenses<br>71:13     | 110:15 162:10            | 77:6 122:22 125:4   |\n| 109:3 163:20<br>excel | 72:4 77:15,17,18      | f                        | 129:22 132:17       |\n| 169:2<br>excess       | 78:23,25 79:7         | し                        | 133:11,12,25        |\n| exchanges<br>181:25   | 105:22 106:12,16      | 81:14 109:17,18<br>188.2 | 134:3 140:14,14     |\n| 160:4<br>excluded     | 106:23,23 107:2,3     | fa<br>41:19              | 152:22,23 154:21    |\n| excluding 125:21      | 107:9,15 108:10       | face<br>102:24           | 154:21 155:10,11    |\n| 11:10<br>excuse       | 108: 15,20,23         | fact<br>115:25 182:21    | 156:15,17 159:9,9   |\n| 51:14 123:16          | 117:6 123:2           | 15:24 60:5<br>facts      | 159:19,23 160:7     |\n| 126:12 137:22         | 124:11 129:22         | 99:10,13 113:9           | federal 11:2 19:17  |\n| 153:14 174:23         | 130:9 133:5,15        | 114:8 146:15             | 19:18 73:17 76:12   |\n| exhibit 7:7 10:14     | 134:10 136:24         | 147.4                    | 79:14.16.18         |\n| 10:17 32:14,18,21     | 140:13 147:7          | factually 150:15         | fee 73:13 123:3     |\n| 35:8,12 41:6 43:6     | 148:7,16 149:17       | fair<br>42:25 53:16      | 157:7,8,9           |\n| 47:24 48:3 91:4       | 149:24 152:21         | 59:20,23 60:22           | feel 48:11 67:3     |\n| 93:12,14 111:4,8      | 183:4,11,12,22        | 72:16 78:15 84:21        | feeling<br>41:18    |\n| 128:24 129:11         | 184:5                 | 88:24 94:19 96:9         | 142:2 178:22        |\n| 131:7,16,21           | experience 7:21       | 97:19 103:20             | fees 33:18 53:9     |\n| 133:16 134:7          | 20:24,25 64:4,7       | 104:6 106:13             | 54:24 62:6 68:2     |\n| 135:11,14,18          | 82:3 164:4,6          | 130:13 134:20            | 69:8,11 70:21       |\n| 136:18 139:24         | 177:16                | 136:21 145:12            | 72:24 77:18,25      |\n| 140:7 141:17          | expert 22:19,19       | 160:9                    | 156:4,24 163:3      |\n| 142:15 144:14         | 40:11,19 41:2         | 44:8<br>fairly           | 175:4,8             |\n| 147:10,15 159:7       | 91:12 165:20          | familiar 7:23            | 132:24<br>felt      |\n| 182:6 187:3,3,5,6     | 166:16                | 12:10 89:21              | fiduciaries 20:17   |\n| 187:7,8,9,10,11,12    | expertise<br>166:6,17 | family 19:15 58:8        | figure 136:5        |\n| 187:13,14             | expired<br>69:15      | 103:13 118:9             | 155:19              |\n| exhibits<br>187:3, 15 | explain<br>36:24      | 129:8 132:16             | figured 160:23      |\n| existed<br>101:23     | 41:22 70:2 82:13      | 143:18                   | 162:16              |\n| 179:12                | 108:5 132:8 148:6     | far<br>6:21 67:14        | file 29:5 38:15,20  |\n| existence 57:7        | 150:8 159:12          | 171:21 173:12            | 40:11 52:25 53:3    |\n| 143:17                | explained 37:15       | 139:17<br>fast           | 74:8,16 75:6 76:6   |\n| 172.7<br>exists       | explanation           | father 118:18            | 76:11,11,16 77:23   |\n| expect 51:7.19        | 144:15                | 143:20                   | 78:14 81:5,7,16,20  |\n| 175:16                | explicit 66:2         | fault 73:8               | 89:6 137:22         |\n|                       |                       |                          | 163:11 175:21       |\n\n[filed - francis]\n\n| filed 3:19 13:9       | 179:6,18            | 62:23 87:13<br>flows | 112:22 113:24         |\n|-----------------------|---------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|\n| 28:24 42:7,8,9        | 4:8<br>financially  | fluid<br>104:20      | 118:4 122:18          |\n| 45:3 48:10 49:7       | 87:16               | 13:730:18<br>flynn   | 125:3,14,16 126:3     |\n| 55:22 62:19 63:14     | financing 14:10     | 45:6,16 49:15,16     | 127:7 130:16          |\n| 68:12 69:23 75:8      | 28:25 54:20         | 50:5 56:4,24         | 132:11 133:18,22      |\n| 75:24 76:5 84:4       | find   40:10 117:25 | 112:17 129:18,19     | 134:15 135:3          |\n| 93:19 100:10          | 156:18              | 149:15,19 150:2      | 141:18 148:20         |\n| 111:5 122:22          | finish<br>8:19      | 150:24 151:11,14     | 149:7 152:11          |\n| 125:4.14.18           | finished 54:11      | 181:18               | 156:13 157:20         |\n| 131:24 135:3          | 4:3,5 21:24<br>firm | flynn's 46:10 50:7   | 166:12,22 170:12      |\n| 160:21 161:23         | 22:13 24:16 39:18   | 151:8                | 170:22 177:25         |\n| 167:4 168:16          | 40:3,25 51:5        | 44:20<br>focused     | 187:9                 |\n| 181:12                | 52:15 56:2,15       | 46:6<br>focusing     | forms<br>98:16        |\n| 80:10<br>files        | 112:15 139:14,14    | 108:18               | forth<br>101:7 112:13 |\n| filing 32:24 61:11    | 156:2 172:13        | 15:15 25:6<br>folks  | 188:10                |\n| 63:12 73:23 75:12     | 176:9               | 29:24 30:10,14       | forward 63:17         |\n| 82:17 92:23 96:9      | firms 62:7 134:7    | 49:14,24 129:21      | 68:17 69:6 75:14      |\n| 96:12 98:23           | first 5:22 16:18    | follow<br>164:18     | 108:13 134:19         |\n| 113:23 132:3,6,18     | 19:3 21:23 43:16    | following 44:25,25   | 157:4 163:3           |\n| 138:2                 | 43:22 44:6,9,21,24  | 148:7,15             | 133:22<br>found       |\n| filings 56:7 73:18    | 45:14,25 46:24      | follows 5:24         | 145:3 146:14,18       |\n| final<br>62:22 87:17  | 47:8 51:13,14,14    | food<br>119:3        | 150:15,17 182:24      |\n| 133:15.24 135:17      | 51:15 55:17,18      | fool<br>178:19       | four 15:12 19:2.3     |\n| 135:21 136:3          | 69:23 73:9 75:19    | foregoing 186:8      | 19:23 21:18 82:23     |\n| 137:24 140:12,20      | 89:3 93:25 94:14    | foreseeable 124:22   | 161:22 165:25         |\n| 140:22 141:4          | 105:3 112:3         | forget<br>102:19     | foxboro<br>6:9        |\n| 144:8 159:8           | 122:21 129:23       | forgot<br>11:10      | frame 34.75           |\n| 183:21,21             | 130:25 139:10       | form 22:16 34:10     | 118:23 146:23         |\n| finally<br>46:13      | 149:14 161:13,14    | 37:16 39:5 54:5      | 154:5                 |\n| 162:16                | 162:3 180:9 186:5   | 57:22 58:18 62:10    | francis 25:18,23      |\n| finances 61:12        | 89:13<br>fit        | 64:14 66:13 72:6     | 26:2,10 30:2,6,7      |\n| 63:12,15              | fitting 101:4       | 72:21 77:4 78:21     | 31:4,8 32:9 56:17     |\n| financial   14:5 21:4 | five 39:10 128:2    | 80:25,25 81:2,3      | 57:3 59:3,5,18        |\n| 21:6 22:15 34:7       | 128:15 141:8        | 84:25 88:3 91:9      | 99:2,7 102:11,20      |\n| 36:23 37:6 39:8       | 161:22              | 92:2 93:5,13 94:2    | 102:21 103:17         |\n| 40:20 41:20 42:25     | 161:7 184:13<br>fix | 94:21 95:9 96:10     | 104:12,15 105:4       |\n| 48:9.20 49:4 54:6     | flavors 17:15       | 98:13,14,15,19       | 105.14 106.7          |\n| 55:20 62:4,5          | floor<br>2:4        | 102:8 103:24         | 109:25 112:15         |\n| 64:22 111:17          | 61:10 62:13<br>flow | 104:13 106:18        | 124:2 129:19          |\n| 112:5 166:10,19       | 62:13 69:21 86:18   | 108:21 109:15        | 135:23 139:8          |\n| 168:3 178:14          |                     | 110:20 111:22        | 143:13 148:4,12       |\n|                       |                     |                      |                       |\n\nPAX-014-061\n\n### [francis - hampshire]\n\n| 152:9,13 156:3          | general<br>88:21      | god<br>47:14       | golden 2:17 5:16   |\n|-------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------|--------------------|\n| 157:16 180:9,18         | 100:15 155:8          | 7:18 43:19<br>goes | 26:18 27:17,18     |\n| frankly 33:12           | 163:9                 | 79:5 101:6 124:18  | 28:7,10,14,17,23   |\n| 150:12                  | generally 13:25       | 156:22             | 29:6 57:23 58:3    |\n| fraudulent 82:10        | 18:24 21:19 22:8      | going 3:3 10:13    | 179:6,9,12,24      |\n| 82:20 171:18            | 24:2 25:5 36:24       | 32:12 35:7,8       | 180:5,6,7,10,15,20 |\n| free 48:11              | 44:12 50:24 55:2      | 36:14 37:5,10,19   | 181:16,20 182:9    |\n| frequently 39:20        | 55:14 57:4 66:3       | 37:24 39:15 40:8   | 182:15,19,19       |\n| 40:2,5 42:15            | 66:23 70:2 73:8       | 40:10,10 41:9      | 183:4,8 184:6      |\n| 64:25 73:5              | 74:24 80:23 82:14     | 44:9 45:5,20 47:3  | goldman 2:15 5:6   |\n| front 15:9 44:18        | 90:12 109:10          | 47:23 52:3,12,22   | 5:66:20 7:10 27:3  |\n| 162:23 180:23           | 110:10 115:6          | 53:7,13 54:2,3,7,8 | 28:4 29:8 85:14    |\n| 163:24<br>firel         | 49:23<br>getting      | 54:9 59:2 68:17    | 164:17,23,24       |\n| full<br>19:8 73:10      | 86:23 135:20          | 68:18,19,21 69:5,6 | 165:15,16 184:22   |\n| fully 12:20             | 137:21 176:4,8        | 69:24 70:19 73:23  | 185:3 187:21       |\n| function<br>87:24       | 179:21                | 76:8,18,19 77:6,9  | golf<br>123:4      |\n| fund 2:4 4:20 6:14      | gettr<br>120:21       | 78:22,23 80:5,15   | good 3:26:10 44:8  |\n| 10:24                   | give 10:6 14:25       | 85:8,14 87:2,3     | 165:16             |\n| funding 127:23          | 147:24 152:20         | 89:5 91:18 92:20   | goods 100:25       |\n| 128:17 184:5            | 153:2 161:6           | 92:23 93:8,11      | 119:16,19          |\n| funds<br>70:17          | 164:25                | 96:24 106:24       | graduate 18:18,19  |\n| 108:12 130:23           | given 105:14          | 107:12,18 108:13   | graduated 17:4,6   |\n| 138:12 155:16           | 131:22 134:25         | 111:3 115:4        | gratuitous 37:7,8  |\n| 175:23                  | 182:11 185:6          | 118:22 123:9,10    | great<br>164:8     |\n| furnishings             | 186:10 188:12         | 123:13,23 124:12   | greenwich 113:20   |\n| 100:25                  | 75:11<br>gives        | 124:13,14,17       | 123:9,14 150:13    |\n| further<br>163:5        | glasses<br>11:11      | 128:23 129:15,23   | 152:16 153:16,24   |\n| 184:23 186:8            | 14:6.7<br>global      | 131:19 134:19      | group 26:14 113:3  |\n| 188:13                  | 51:10,11 111:7,14     | 139:15,16 143:6    | 143:7 144:8 153:8  |\n| future 69:23 78:4       | 111:24 187:10         | 147:14 149:2       | 120:20<br>gtv      |\n| 78:5,8,12,20 85:3       | go<br>3:14 7:22 11:12 | 151:22 155:18,18   | guess 15:8,12 19:3 |\n| 86:19 87:13             | 28:2 38:12,13         | 155:19,20 156:15   | 77:5 127:2,3,6     |\n| 124:22 157:18           | 40:13 44:17 53:6      | 156:16,18 157:22   | 149:8              |\n| g                       | 54:19 90:18           | 157:22,24 158:2,6  | guessing<br>66:8   |\n| 5:21                    | 103:25 107:5          | 158:12,21,23       | guidance<br>161:6  |\n| g<br>garbage 61:3,3,5,6 | 111:23 114:4          | 159:3 161:5 163:3  | 170:24<br>guy      |\n| 107:12<br>gas           | 122:3,20 124:18       | 163:14 168:21      | h                  |\n| gasoline<br>117:9       | 139:15,16,19          | 169:16,18 170:25   | 23:16 187:2<br>h   |\n| gathered 29:4           | 144:7 156:21,22       | 171:5,11 175:10    | half<br>93:7       |\n| 123:17                  | 164:21 176:25         | 175:23,25 177:8    | hampshire 176:16   |\n|                         | 183:20                | 181 · 9            | 176:24             |\n|                         |                       |                    |                    |\n\n[hand - increase]\n\n| hand 27:24 32:12  | 174:15                 | hoping<br>148:25  | 116:25 117:18     |\n|-------------------|------------------------|-------------------|-------------------|\n| 34:22 47:23 93:11 | 46:15<br>hearings      | 149:3 175:6 177:8 | 118:9 123:2,5     |\n| 110:9 111:3       | 51:13                  | hospital 122:4    | 173:13            |\n| 117:21 128:23     | heat<br>107:11         | 59:12<br>hot      | immediately 44:25 |\n| 130:22 131:20     | held<br>1:17 3:23      | 114:17<br>hotel   | impair<br>9:25    |\n| 146:7 188:19      | 11:17 23:2 165:10      | 15:13<br>hour     | important   8:18  |\n| handing 147:14    | help 24:13 46:7        | 15:11,11<br>hours | 75:3 132:24 168:6 |\n| happen 47:13 52:3 | 57:7 137:4             | 39:10 67:21       | 172:11 174:7      |\n| 52:12 69:3 89:12  | helped<br>137:9        | 164:19 166:2      | inadvertent 133:6 |\n| 89:13 162:17      | helpful<br>14:14       | 101:25<br>house   | 134:6,22          |\n| happens 80:3      | 38:25 137:4 138:8      | 149:17            | inadvertently     |\n| 81:15 82:22       | helping 100:9          | household 97:25   | 125:12 132:16     |\n| 178:11,12         | 169:11<br>helps        | 100:24 101:4,15   | 133:21 134:2      |\n| harassed 143:15   | herein before          | 102:5 119:16,19   | inappropriate     |\n| harassment 27:21  | 186:11 188:10          | housekeeping      | 29:9,16           |\n| 28:5,6            | 188:18<br>hereunto     | 144:20,23         | include 22:18     |\n| harbach 2:6 4:21  | 163:14,24<br>hey       | 8:25<br>huh       | 80:11 94:16       |\n| 4:21 23:12 41:13  | high 17:3,5 19:10      | human 110:21      | 107:14 122:15     |\n| 59:13 85:16 99:20 | 19:24 94:14            | hundred 64:9      | included 65:14    |\n| 99:25 100:3.5     | hill -<br>179:24 180:5 | 138:21 139:4      | 125:15 132:23     |\n| 103:2 147:24      | hire<br>80:5           | 141:13 142:22     | 133:19 134:2,5,13 |\n| 152:5 153:11      | hired<br>90:5          | 143:6,24 144:2    | 134:23 137:14     |\n| 165:6 180:6       | hiring<br>40:25        | 146:20 168:15     | 150:25 151:25     |\n| 187:19,20         | history 17:3           | husband<br>141:12 | 159:11,17 160:11  |\n| hard -<br>127:12  | hit<br>162:7           | 142:8 145:14      | includes 19:6     |\n| haven 2:18 116:2  | hits<br>73:7           | i                 | 61:23 62:12       |\n| 116:15            | 1:5 2:9 3:18 5:5<br>ho | idea 7:19 44:8    | including 39:22   |\n| hazard 15:8       | 11:6 94:4 111:18       | 67:23 90:17       | 40:14 61:11 70:24 |\n| hch 152:22        | hold 18:11,18          | 126:24 151:20     | 86:7 115:16       |\n| head 8:24 155:4   | 36:14 37:10,19         | identification    | inclusion 125:24  |\n| heading 11:22     | holding 114:25         | 10:17 32:19 35:13 | income 52:25 53:3 |\n| health 121:18,22  | home 6:7 107:8,9       | 48:3 93:15 111:9  | 53:5 62:15 63:5,9 |\n| 121:24 122:2,8    | 118: 19,25             | 129:12 131:17     | 73:17,24 74:16,17 |\n| hear 127:13       | homeowner's            | 139:25 147:11     | 74:20 76:15,17,22 |\n| 171:14            | 154:10                 | identified 7:12   | 77:8,11,12 78:8   |\n| heard 45:24 82:21 | homeowners             | 103:22 104:8      | 79:20 87:25 125:5 |\n| 104:15 127:15,17  | 107:7                  | 134:7 181:23      | 125:16,21         |\n| 182:9             | homes 119:5 154:8      | identity 26:18    | incorrect 125:18  |\n| hearing 45:17     | honestly 12:21         | 27:23 28:16 74:8  | increase 141:8    |\n| 46:14 47:9 51:15  | hope 64:3 100:22       | imagine 54:18     | 142:12,17 145:24  |\n| 123:18,19 127:18  | 159:4 171:2            | 61.75 66.72       |                   |\n\n**[increased** - **issues]**\n\n| increased<br>142: 14  | 139:7, 12 145:2       | 122:2,8 146:4,12       | investigated           |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------------------|------------------------|\n| 144: 13               | 146:10 152:10         | 146: 19 148:8,17       | 101:22 110: 11,24      |\n| increasing<br>141: 10 | 153:3 155:13,14       | 150:3,4, 11, 12, 16    | investigation<br>40:7  |\n| 143:23 145: 10        | 156:20 157: 14        | 150: 17 152: 15        | 40:9,22 59: 16         |\n| incurred<br>142:6     | 158:20 174:4          | 153:24 154:7,10        | 63:8 95:7 97:22        |\n| 177:7                 | 176:3 177:22          | 158:21,22              | 102:9 108:24           |\n| independent<br>63:8   | 183:19,19 184:9       | intellectual<br>120:7  | 115:6,18 119:14        |\n| 95:6 97:21114:10      | informed<br>44:2      | 120:13,15,18           | 119:22 128:11          |\n| 119: 13 122:5         | 99:13 103:16,18       | intend<br>171:24       | 157: 18 158:9          |\n| 123: 19 128:7         | 103: 19 104: 16       | intended<br>32:25      | 179:15 183:15          |\n| 152: 10               | 180: 11               | 34: 19 40:4,6 62:7     | investigations         |\n| indicate<br>7:2       | informs<br>127:5      | 89: 15 110:20          | 114:11                 |\n| indicating<br>135: 12 | initial<br>140:23     | 125:19                 | investment<br>177:4    |\n| 137: 18 152:6         | 141:20,21             | interact<br>16:23      | 177:6                  |\n| 161:19 162:11         | initiated<br>25: 12   | 22:3                   | invoice<br>158:8       |\n| individual<br>21:8    | input<br>43 :21 59:6  | interaction<br>146: 17 | involved<br>20:7       |\n| 24:15 41:2,19,23      | 72:22 114:22          | interactions<br>15:2   | 31:2149:15,17,20       |\n| 43:4 70:4 74:3,4,6    | inputting<br>162:4    | interest<br>20:22      | 50:2152:2453:4         |\n| 74: 15, 15, 16, 17    | inquire<br>153 :23    | 53: 11 77:20 80:3      | 55:24 56:6,20          |\n| 75:23 77:2, 19        | inquiries<br>51: 16   | 87:12 113:16           | 57:24 59:7 65: 10      |\n| 164:4,11 183:23       | inquiry<br>161:9      | 119: 10 120:7,18       | 65: 18 90:9 100:8      |\n| individual's<br>27:20 | 163:16                | 121: 16 147:5          | 101:13 105:22          |\n| individually<br>79:24 | insiders<br>82: 19    | interested<br>4:9      | 109:6,9 132:4          |\n| individuals<br>19:5   | insolvency<br>17:24   | 22:15 41:17 49:10      | 178:7 179:21           |\n| 42: 19 57:8 85:5      | 18:5,6 19:4 21:24     | 151:3 178:4            | involvement<br>115:9   |\n| 158: 16               | 165: 19 166: 16       | 188: 16                | iphone<br>103:11       |\n| industry<br>60:17,21  | instance<br>62:3 89:9 | interests<br>101: 11   | irrespective<br>70: 19 |\n| inform<br>124:3       | 138: 15               | 115:13                 | irs<br>76:19 89:10     |\n| information<br>12:20  | instances<br>40: 19   | interfere<br>3:1110:5  | irve<br>2:15 5:6       |\n| 22: 16 24: 16 29:3    | 164:6                 | interference<br>3:9    | 164:24 165:16          |\n| 29:7 30:22,24         | institutions<br>64:23 | internal<br>25:6       | island<br>176: 15,21   |\n| 31:3,9,12 58:10       | instructed<br>43 :7,9 | 80: 14                 | issue<br>27:23 73 :6   |\n| 59:6,16 69:24         | instructing<br>26:21  | internally<br>13:10    | 75:10 82:23            |\n| 85:7 94:4 98: 11      | 26:23 27:12           | interpreter<br>127: 14 | 124:23,23 150:5        |\n| 99:11,17 104:11       | instruction<br>29: 10 | interrelated<br>113 :7 | issued<br>54:7         |\n| 105:3,7, 12 110:6     | instructor<br>18:5    | interrupt<br>41:8      | issues<br>18:3 27:24   |\n| 116:9 124:10,14       | instructs<br>9:21     | introduce<br>174: 16   | 40:24 44:8 52:6        |\n| 124: 16,20 127:5      | insufficient<br>8:25  | investigate<br>102: 14 | 53:15 72:3 110:11      |\n| 133:2 135:2           | insurance<br>69: 14   | 105:17 110:25          | 147:20 174:6           |\n| 136:13 137:3,12       | 107:8 117: 10         | 113: 10 124: 17        | 182:12                 |\n| 137: 19 138:3,7       | 121: 17,18,22,24      | 168: 19                |                        |\n|                       |                       |                        |                        |\n\n| item 55:5 61:16.20     | 36:1 37:1 38:1     | 149:1 150:1 151:1 | keypunch<br>98:19   |\n|------------------------|--------------------|-------------------|---------------------|\n| 63:11,18 64:13         | 39:1 40:1 41:1     | 152:1 153:1 154:1 | keypunched 98:16    |\n| 66:12 68:6,16          | 42:1 43:1 44:1     | 155:1 156:1 157:1 | kids<br>118:15      |\n| 73:15,20 80:16,21      | 45:1 46:1 47:1,24  | 158:1 159:1 160:1 | 138:25              |\n| 82:7 83:6.19           | 48:1,2,11,25 49:1  | 161:1 162:1 163:1 | kind 20:22 88:24    |\n| 84:11,24 85:18,22      | 50:1 51:1 52:1     | 164:1 165:1 166:1 | 116:17 118:17       |\n| 86:2,6 87:7,21         | 53:1 54:1 55:1     | 167:1 168:1 169:1 | 122:12 134:22       |\n| 88:15,20 89:19         | 56:1 57:1 58:1     | 170:1 171:1 172:1 | kings<br>188:4      |\n| 91:5 92:19 94:14       | 59:1 60:1 61:1     | 173:1 174:1 175:1 | 45:20 105:6<br>knew |\n| 94:15,16 95:4,7,23     | 62:163:164:1       | 176:1 177:1 178:1 | 113:9 178:16,18     |\n| 95:24 96:2 97:11       | 65:1 66:1 67:1     | 179:1 180:1 181:1 | 182:22              |\n| 97:13 103:11,12        | 68:1 69:1 70:1     | 182:1 183:1 184:1 | know 7:16 9:10      |\n| 103:13,14 104:2,2      | 71:172:173:1       | 185:1,7 186:15    | 22:4 30:12 31:7     |\n| 111:20 113:17          | 74:1 75:1 76:1     | 187:3             | 31:17 33:19 34:13   |\n| 127:22 142:14          | 77:1 78:1 79:1     | 1:6<br>jam        | 34:18 36:7 38:16    |\n| 144:12,20 146:12       | 80:1 81:1 82:1     | january 161:18    | 38:16,22 39:13      |\n| 152:4                  | 83:1 84:1 85:1     | 13:8 31:25<br>jo  | 41:4 43:18 47:3     |\n| items<br>89:16 96:21   | 86:1 87:1 88:1     | 49:16 50:9 56:5   | 50:3 52:3,21,22     |\n| 97:24,24,25 98:7       | 89:1 90:1 91:1     | 56:24 112:17      | 53:9 57:23 58:2.3   |\n| 99:12 101:3,12,15      | 92:1 93:1,12,14,22 | 86:13<br>joint    | 58:12 60:4,9,25     |\n| 102:5,22 103:22        | 94:195:196:1       | 2:22<br>jon       | 62:21 64:9 65:16    |\n| 107:13 119:16,18       | 97:1 98:1 99:1     | jonathan 4:2      | 66:3,5,23,24 67:6   |\n| 119:23 121:8,11        | 100:1 101:1 102:1  | judge 29:9,13     | 72:19,23 76:7,17    |\n| 132:7 136:19,25        | 103:1 104:1 105:1  | 87:16             | 77:7,10,12,13       |\n| 137:13 160:11          | 106:1 107:1 108:1  | judges 22:14      | 79:10,12,13 80:14   |\n| 163:6,19               | 109:1 110:1 111:1  | judgment 37:22    | 83:23 84:5,10       |\n| I                      | 111:4,8 112:1      | 102:4 136:15      | 86:14 89:9,11,20    |\n| 2:10,15 5:21 6:5       | 113:1 114:1 115:1  | iune<br>17:9      | 89:25 90:4 103:25   |\n| 1:15 3:1,18<br>jalbert | 116:1 117:1 118:1  | justice 64:23     | 104:3,4 107:10      |\n| 4:1 5:1 6:1,5,14       | 119:1 120:1 121:1  | justify<br>148:15 | 109:19 111:24       |\n| 7:18:19:1 10:1         | 122:1 123:1 124:1  | k                 | 115:3 116:3,3,4,5   |\n| 10:14,16,19 11:1       | 125:1 126:1 127:1  | keep   41:2 52:16 | 116:5,14,17 117:8   |\n| 12:1 13:1 14:1         | 128:1,24 129:1,11  | 59:14 107:12      | 117:8,10,20 118:7   |\n| 15:1 16:1 17:1         | 129:14 130:1       | 124:17            | 120:21 121:13       |\n| 18:11 19:1 20:1        | 131:1,16,20 132:1  | keeping 42:11     | 122:23,24 123:3     |\n| 21:1 22:1 23:1         | 133:1 134:1 135:1  | keith<br>20:6     | 125:8,13,20         |\n| 24:1 25:1 26:1         | 136:1 137:1 138:1  | 9:17 13:6<br>ken  | 126:20 127:12       |\n| 27:1 28:1 29:1         | 139:1,24 140:1,7   | 14:16,21,24       | 145:15 150:11       |\n| 30:1 31:1 32:1,13      | 141:1 142:1 143:1  | kenneth 2:10 5:3  | 151:18,21 152:2     |\n| 32:18 33:1 34:1        | 144:1 145:1 146:1  | kept 7:17 162:10  | 152:13 154:7        |\n| 34:23 35:1,8,12        | 147:1,10,15 148:1  |                   | 157:21 159:3,21     |\n|                        |                    |                   |                     |\n\n[know - llp's]\n\n| 161:2,15 166:21      | lago<br>122:13 124:4 | legitimate<br>160:5  | liquidate<br>171:5    |\n|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|\n| 168:11 169:4,5,17    | 124:21               | lenaya 1:19 4:5      | liquidated 88:2       |\n| 170:13 171:7         | lamp 126:8,20        | 188:6,21             | list 7:17 53:6        |\n| 172:16,19 173:7      | 127:16,20 179:14     | lenders 20:20 21:7   | 64:22 87:6 90:4       |\n| 173:20,25 175:5      | 179:15,24            | 58:24<br>lengthy     | 107:4 154:4           |\n| 176:2 177:3,7        | land<br>113:16       | 31:16,22<br>letter   | 155:19,20 157:24      |\n| 179:11 181:8,9,11    | language 114:23      | 32:5 43:12 75:13     | 159:23 172:7          |\n| 181:22 182:5,12      | large 30:20 59:8     | 76:3                 | 173:4                 |\n| 182:18,20,21         | 78:5                 | level 53:12 72:25    | listed 12:3 72:19     |\n| 184:7,18             | 2:5 4:18<br>laura    | 94:14 149:23         | 108:12 111:25         |\n| knowing 29:4         | 6:12 103:3,6         | levels 59:5          | 114:14 122:12         |\n| knowledge 12:15      | law 22:13 39:18      | liabilities 30:23    | 128:3                 |\n| 12:19 41:3 59:9      | 112:15 134:7         | 94:3 111:17          | listen<br>124:7       |\n| 62:17 63:3.4         | 43:18 46:8<br>lawyer | 164:10,12            | listened 123:15       |\n| 91:10 102:10         | 86:20 102:17         | liability 157:5,6    | listing<br>108:13     |\n| 121:15 122:7         | 113:25 138:20        | 169:23<br>life       | 160:23                |\n| 123:17,20,22         | 139:14 178:23        | likelihood<br>82:4   | litigation<br>19:6    |\n| 126:9 127:20         | lawyer's<br>40:7     | limitations 111:15   | 22:4,7,11,11 40:6     |\n| 128:7,21 133:20      | lawyers 22:20        | limited 5:17 90:7    | 77:981:25 82:5        |\n| 140:12 152:10,20     | 25:12,14,1639:21     | 163:9 178:17         | 85:19 88:2 127:23     |\n| 154:9 158:3          | 51:17 82:18 95:5     | line   5:13 44:18,18 | 128:15,17 170:19      |\n| 172:21 174:18        | 96:23 102:7 110:8    | 61:15,20 63:11,18    | 170:25 175:14         |\n| 184:15               | 125:17 126:2         | 64:12 66:12 68:5     | 178:18                |\n| 47:14<br>knows       | 128:6 132:24         | 68:16 73:15,19       | little<br>14:19 16:25 |\n| kwok<br>1:5 2:9 3:19 | 136:16 139:14        | 80:16,21 82:7        | 21:25 24:3 46:17      |\n| 5:5 11:6 25:21,24    | 150:20 155:23        | 83:6,19 84:11,24     | 89:12,12              |\n| 32:1635:9 94:4       | 158.3 159.7          | 85:17,22 86:2,6      | 146:22 150:18<br>live |\n| 102:6,23 103:14      | 170:18 172:22        | 87:7,21 88:15,20     | 118:15<br>lives       |\n| 104:9 111:18         | 174:6                | 89:16,19 91:5        | 149:16,22             |\n| 119:24 122:16        | ૨૫ - ૨<br>ead        | 92:19 94:14,16,22    | living 114:8          |\n| 129:2 138:23         | learn<br>30:5,7      | 95:3,7,13,15 96:2    | 129:22 133:15         |\n| 139:2 140:8 143:2    | leave<br>152:24,25   | 96:16,21 97:11       | 134:9 136:17          |\n| 147:17               | leaving 41:11        | 99:12 103:12,13      | 140:13 153:17         |\n| kwok's<br>30:3       | 102:7 144:4<br>left  | 111:19 132:7         | 159:8 183:3,11,12     |\n| 119:10 145:17        | legal 2:22 101:8     | 136:19,25 137:13     | 184.5                 |\n| l                    | 105:9 106:6          | 146:12 152:4         | 2:12 75:24<br>lle     |\n| 5:21 6:5 23:16       | 113:15 114:7,25      | 159:14,15 163:6      | 126:21                |\n| 186:2                | 153:8                | 163:19               | 1:18 2:3,4,8<br>llp   |\n| 63:5<br>ack          | legally 76:2         | lines 95:19 104:4    | 3:24                  |\n| lady<br>119:7,10     | 168:14               | 126:18               | llp's 10:24           |\n|                      |                      |                      |                       |\n\n**[loan** - **massachusetts]**\n\n| loan<br>63:23 64:2     | lowey<br>1: 15 7:9   | lynch<br>1: 19 4:5    | major<br>19:3 67:2   |\n|------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|\n| 65: 11, 15, 19,22,25   | 10:25 13:24 15:16    | 188:6,21              | 89:15                |\n| 66:6, 15 68:2          | 17: 12 18:22,25      | m                     | makenzie<br>2:6 4:24 |\n| 70:16                  | 20:6,10,15 21:16     | macdonald<br>49: 19   | 34:21 146:7          |\n| loans<br>64:5,10 66:3  | 21:2122:24 23:6      | maid<br>118:8 145:4   | making<br>73: 11     |\n| located<br>3:24 101:5  | 23: 18,25 24: 17     | 145:4 158:24          | 101: 14 102:3        |\n| 113: 19                | 25:7 26:3 30: 13     | maids<br>145:4        | 113:3 153:7          |\n| location<br>123 :21    | 31:15 36:8,18        |                       | 167: 13 184: 10, 16  |\n| lodge<br>101: 17       | 37:3,24 38:21        | mail<br>26:9, 13, 13  | manager<br>50:8, 13  |\n| long<br>15:5 137: 18   | 39:4,17 43:7 48:8    | 30: 19 32: 17 34:3    | managers<br>50: 16   |\n| 139: 15 160:20         | 48:20 49:4,18        | 35: 11, 19 37: 18     | 51: 19               |\n| 165:22                 | 50:2, 15,20 56: 19   | 38:6 39:7,9 41: 17    | managing<br>51:4     |\n| look<br>31:25 35:15    | 57:2 58: 15,21       | 104:24 106:9          | 70:16                |\n| 40:8 48: 11 82: 16     | 59:15,25 61:15,19    | 129:9, 10, 15, 17,24  | mandarin<br>57: 18   |\n| 111:23 152:15          | 64:12 65:9,13        | 130: 11 131: 15       | 174:20               |\n| 174:7 178:13           | 66: 10 67: 13,24     | 139:23 141:2          | mar<br>122: 13 124:4 |\n| looked<br>13 :22 70:7  | 71:12,18 72:17       | 147:9 151:13          | 124:21               |\n| 133:16 136:14          | 73:19 76:10,25       | 152:9 160: 18         | march<br>23:22 45:8  |\n| 163:21173:22,25        | 78: 16 80:20 82:4    | 162: 19 169:4         | 72: 10, 10 73 :6     |\n| 174:8 181:21           | 83:5 84:17,22        | 173:15 180:10,19      | 122:25 134: 15       |\n| looking<br>14:3 22: 14 | 85:25 87:20,23       | 181:25 182:2,4        | 137:22 155:17,18     |\n| 22:16 69:17            | 93:3 94:6,10 95:3    | 187:6, 7, 11, 12, 13  | 156: 16,18           |\n| 136:17 142:15          | 96:20 97:10,16       | 187: 14               | mark<br>7:6 35:7     |\n| 154:22 162:20          | 98:6 99:5 100:8      | mails<br>13:11,23     | 131:9                |\n| 172:4 175: 18,23       | 101: 13 102:3        | 14:2,4 15:20 27:9     | marked<br>10: 16     |\n| 175:24                 | 109:6, 11 112: 16    | 27: 10 49:22 59: 11   | 32:13,18 35:12       |\n| looks<br>107:5 132:5   | 112: 17,20 122: 15   | 99: 19 104:23         | 47:24 48:2 93:12     |\n| loose<br>132:7         | 124:9 125:22         | 112:24 163:8          | 93:14 111:4,8        |\n| lose<br>75: 19         | 128: 10 135:20       | 180:8,22 181:21       | 128:24 129: 11       |\n| losses<br>78: 12       | 136:22 144:21        | main<br>2:13 25:2,3   | 131:7, 16,20         |\n| lot<br>42:1047:11      | 149:11163:17         | 163:12                | 139:24 140:7         |\n| 68:18 69:24            | lowey's<br>12: 15,22 | maine<br>176: 17,23   | 147: 10,15           |\n| 104:25 112:13,14       | 44: 13 55: 15 67:9   | maintain<br>17:25     | markedly<br>41 :20   |\n| 122:3 127:8            | 106:3 111:20         | 54:3 91:7 92: 10      | marking<br>10:13     |\n| 168:23,24 178: 18      | 112:8 134:21         | maintained            | marriage<br>188: 15  |\n| lots<br>99:13,14       | 135: 16 140:23       | 156:21                | married<br>142:25    |\n| 106:21113:10           | Ip<br>4:20           | maintaining<br>63: 19 | mary<br>13:8 31:24   |\n| 167: 19 169:21         | lunch<br>123:4       | 64: 16 91:5           | 49: 16 56:4,24       |\n| 178:2,2                | luxury<br>115: 16,23 | maintenance           | 112: 17              |\n| low<br>53:12           | 116: 13              | 107:8 144:22          | massachusetts<br>6:9 |\n|                        |                      | 145:6 158:23          | 176: 13,16,22        |\n\n85\n\n### [materialize - monthly]\n\n| materialize 52:7     | meeting 16:16,17   | met 6:11 16:13,18   | mitchell 25:17,20  |\n|----------------------|--------------------|---------------------|--------------------|\n| materializes 60:12   | 45:14.15 46:16.25  | 16:19 30:18 58:15   | 25:25 26:10 31:4   |\n| materials 150:19     | 47:13 51:15 69:5   | 125:15.16           | 31:8 32:9 56:18    |\n| matt 45:6,15 46:9    | 116:2 123:15       | method 152:22       | 57:4 59:4,4,18     |\n| 49:15,15 50:4,7      | 126:13 127:10      | methodology         | 99:3.8 102:11      |\n| 56:24 112:17         | meetings 46:19     | 111:15              | 103:17 104:12,16   |\n| 129:18,19 154:4      | 47:12              | 167.23<br>mezzanine | 105:4,13 106:7     |\n| 160:17 181:18        | melissa 25:18,23   | microphone 3:11     | 109:24 112:15      |\n| matter 1:16 3:18     | 26:2,10 30:2,6     | 165:2               | 124:2 129:18       |\n| 6:23 20:8 41:9       | 31:4,8 32:9 56:16  | microphones 3:6     | 135:23 139:8       |\n| 43:8 46:4 49:17      | 56:17 57:3 59:3,4  | middle 113:14       | 143:14 156:3       |\n| 50:21 51:6 53:12     | 59:10,17 99:2,7    | 162:14<br>midnight  | 157:16 181:5       |\n| 67:13 76:5 81:25     | 102:11,18 103:17   | million<br>126:8    | 148:4<br>m k       |\n| 90:9 115:25 129:2    | 104:11,15 105:4    | 154:13 164:12       | moment 62:24       |\n| 145:6 147:17         | 105:13 106:7       | miltenberger 2:19   | 153:12             |\n| 151:23 160:25        | 109:25 110:18      | 5:14,16 28:13,14    | monetize<br>120:24 |\n| 174:10 188:17        | 112:15 124:2       | 29:23 41:7,15       | 54:21<br>money     |\n| matters 7:2 14:2     | 129:19 135:23      | miltenberger's      | 62:14 78:4 134:18  |\n| 40:2 88:22 98:20     | 139:8 143:13       | 29:21               | 153:24 177:4       |\n| matthew<br>13:7 56:4 | 148:3 152:12       | mind 27:14 34:18    | monies<br>136:6    |\n| medonald<br>15:18    | 156:2 157:16       | 34:24 36:20 87:5    | monitor<br>92:14   |\n| mckenzie<br>131:2    | 160:16 174:5       | 99:20 164:21        | monitoring 91:13   |\n| 141:9,10<br>meals    | 180:9,17 182:3     | mindy<br>20:9       | month<br>72:15     |\n| 144:15               | 55:7<br>member     | 46:8<br>mine        | 118:21 161:7       |\n| mean 17:16 21:9      | 172:12             | minimum 32:8        | 184:2              |\n| 39:24 44:23 60:14    | membership         | 67:7 77:14 128:6    | monthly 45:6       |\n| 83:12 86:8 87:9      | 122:13,17 124:5    | 161 · 7<br>minor    | 46:11 51:12 67:8   |\n| 96:11 110:4          | memories<br>113:12 | minute 11:13 33:3   | 68:7,11,18,23 69:7 |\n| 116:14 130:19        | memory 66:2,9      | 147:24              | 69:10,12 70:2,15   |\n| 138:14 149:2         | 115:22 127:8,9     | 14:20<br>minutes    | 70:18 71:2,3,8,13  |\n| 175:14 177:19        | 141:20 159:17      | 89:11               | 72:3,20 105:21     |\n| means 8:3 82:14      | menial 170:2,7     | 89.14<br>minutiae   | 106:12,16 107:14   |\n| 144:3 151:2          | mentioned 14:15    | miscommunicati      | 107:22,25 108:20   |\n| meant 22:7 63:12     | 15:15 18:4 19:24   | 135:4               | 116:22 117:14,16   |\n| 159:12               | 22:23 24:11 25:23  | missed<br>23:11     | 118:11 122:16,21   |\n| media 3:16 120:19    | 29:25 49:14,19     | missing 32:281:9    | 123:7 124:6,11     |\n| 120:23,24            | 54:14 57:3,14      | 110:15              | 125:5,16 130:14    |\n| 171:3<br>mediation   | 60:13 73:22 87:8   | 159:24<br>mistake   | 130:21 132:2,25    |\n| medications 10:4     | 92:4 100:7 126:16  | misunderstood       | 134:9,24 135:10    |\n| meet 16:15 45:22     | 165:18             | 56:22               | 147:8 148:7,16,24  |\n| 72:5                 |                    |                     | 149:3,24 151:25    |\n\nPAX-014-068\n\n## [monthly - objection]\n\n| 154:20 155:12,15     | 116:4 138:10          | 115:25 116:15        | 136:12 141:17                       |\n|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------|\n| 157:11,19 160:4,8    | 173:4.8.23 174:9      | 146:22 156:13        | 145:2 153:6                         |\n| 160:24 161:11,16     | 182:6, 14             | 173:18 176:14,16     | 158:15                              |\n| 161:17,23 162:2      | named<br>119:7        | 176:23 188:3,7       | numerous 44:5                       |\n| 163:5,13,20 168:9    | 136:22<br>names       | night<br>14:22       | 59:11 101:3                         |\n| 169:7,11 184:19      | 107:12<br>natural     | no l's<br>78:7       | 112:24                              |\n| months 72:7          | nature 52:21          | nonsense 162:11      | 5:16<br>ny                          |\n| 161:25 183:20        | 168:13 183:16         | 8:17 77:19<br>normal | 0                                   |\n| mor 72:11 108:14     | 136:3<br>nearly       | 179:3                | 23:16 78:11                         |\n| 137:22               | necessarily 83:24     | normally 109:15      | 0<br>186:2                          |\n| mor's 170:6          | necessary 12:20       | notary 1:19 5:23     |                                     |\n| morning 3:3 6:10     | 63:21 75:25 80:18     | 186:22 188:6         | o'melveny 1:17                      |\n| 14:20,22             | 85:18 93:2 100:23     | note 3:5 29:20       | 2:3 3:24 4:19,22<br>4:25 6:13 13:18 |\n| mortgage 77:19       | 112:7 169:21          | 35:24 41:11          | 100:5 103:7                         |\n| mother<br>118:17     | need 8:23 9:9         | 145:19               | oath<br>4:77:25                     |\n| motion<br>14:9 28:25 | 36:14 37:11,20        | 29:18<br>noted       | 129:25                              |\n| 38:15,20 89:7        | 40:12,15,23 42:10     | 14:6,7,7<br>notes    | object                              |\n| 90:10,16 168:6       | 47:4 85:9 124:19      | 51:10,11 100:9,13    | objected 30:20<br>80:19             |\n| motions<br>6:24      | 127:4 143:3 156:9     | 100:14.19 101:3      | objecting<br>objection 12:4,24      |\n| 181:12               | 163:14 166:20,23      | 111:7,14,24          | 24:20 26:16 27:15                   |\n| motor 119:5          | 169:18 170:10,15      | 112:12 113:4         | 28:24 29:22 34:10                   |\n| motorcycles          | 171:14                | 121:6 148:4          | 37:16 39:5 57:22                    |\n| 115:17               | needed 30:22,25       | 187:10               | 58:18 61:4 64:14                    |\n| 75:14<br>move        | 44:2 46:7 174:4       | notice 6:22,25 7:5   | 66:13 77:4 78:21                    |\n| moving 34:24 57:2    | needing 166:10,13     | 7:12 10:15,24        | 79:22 81:10,12                      |\n| multi 42:22,22       | needs 167:6           | 89:10 187:5          |                                     |\n| multiple 19:14       | 169:19                | noticing 4:17        | 84:25 88:3,8 91:9<br>92:2 93:5 95:9 |\n| 42:4 76:4            | negotiated<br>31:14   | november 127:24      | 96:10 98:15 99:24                   |\n| multiplied 136:7     | 31:15                 | number 3:22 6:24     | 101:18 102:8                        |\n| multiply 183:25      | negotiation<br>31:18  | 19:16 30:21 32:16    | 103:24 104:13                       |\n| music<br>120:7,18    | 65:10                 | 62:6 73:4 81:4,15    | 106:18 108:21                       |\n| 1:18 2:3<br>myers    | negotiations 171:3    | 93:19 96:8 100:20    | 111:22 112:22                       |\n| 3:24 4:19,22,25      | neither 58:14         | 110:19,20 132:22     | 113:24 118:4                        |\n| 6:13                 | net   19:10,24 78:11  | 133:16,20 134:19     | 122:18 126:3                        |\n| n                    | netherland<br>114:17  | 135:13,18 146:20     | 127:7 130:16                        |\n| 2:278:11 186:2       | 115:2                 | 150:9,10 152:14      | 132:11 133:18                       |\n| n<br>187:17          | never 57:6 121:23     | 159:14,15 181:21     | 141:18 148:20                       |\n| name 4:2 6:3,11      | 1:18,18,21 2:5<br>new | 183:22 187:4         | 149:7 152:11                        |\n| 20:5 23:12,13,15     | 2:5,10,10,183:25      | numbering 97:7       | 157:20 166:12,22                    |\n| 23:16 27:20 28:22    | 3:25 5:23 58:8        | numbers 48:23        | 170:12,22 177:25                    |\n| 29:5 58:12 102:18    | 79:15,16 115:8,10     | 97:5 135:21          |                                     |\n|                      |                       |                      |                                     |\n\n85\n\n### [objections - paragraph]\n\n| objections 4:14      | 108:20,23 137:20   | oral 65:18 99:17     | page 7:8 11:8,21   |\n|----------------------|--------------------|----------------------|--------------------|\n| 12:8 14:10 52:20     | 170:24 178:18      | 99:18                | 33:2,4 48:22,23,24 |\n| 52:22 54:8           | open 47:13 91:7    | orally 106:9         | 49:9,11 55:13,18   |\n| objects 9:18         | 92:10              | 160:18               | 88:20 93:25 95:18  |\n| obligation 91:22     | opening 63:19      | order   29:15 62:11  | 96:4,25 97:4,8     |\n| observer 45:20       | 64:16 91:5         | 72:23 75:3,5,8       | 105:18,20 106:11   |\n| 12:19<br>obtain      | operating 41:21    | 86:9,21 105:5        | 113:13,14 115:12   |\n| obtained 59:17       | 41:24,25 42:11,20  | ordered<br>54:25     | 119:9,12,20 120:3  |\n| 22:15<br>obtaining   | 42:21 43:3 45:7    | ordinarily 172:5     | 121:3 124:25       |\n| obviously 43:18      | 46:11 51:12 67:8   | ordinary 30:21       | 126:5,10 132:7     |\n| 66:18 87:17 98:17    | 68:7,11,19,23      | 62:7 70:24 156:7     | 140:19 145:20      |\n| 105:8 156:21         | 69:10,12 70:3,6,10 | 156:8 167:18         | 148:3 149:15       |\n| 163:15 173:21        | 70:15,18 71:2,4,8  | 169:22 181:7         | 151:14 152:8       |\n| occasion<br>174:17   | 71:13 72:4,21      | original<br>150:10   | 157:6 161:19.20    |\n| occasionally         | 78:12 106:12,16    | 152:3 159:20         | 161:20 162:3       |\n| 141:22,24            | 107:22 108:2       | originally<br>153:13 | 187:3,18           |\n| 113:19<br>occupancy  | 116:22 117:14,16   | 4.9<br>outcome       | pages 161:19,22    |\n| 113:22               | 118:11 122:16,22   | 188:16               | 162:11             |\n| 68:3<br>occur        | 123:8 124:6        | outside 16:22 26:3   | paid 32:24 70:23   |\n| offer<br>18:25       | 130:15,21 132:2    | 26:5,6,14 31:5       | 72:14 73:13 77:25  |\n| office<br>19:16 58:8 | 132:25 134:4,5,9   | 80:4 126:10          | 86:16 108:10,15    |\n| 68:24 69:20 72:12    | 134:24 135:11      | 127:17               | 118:22 130:24      |\n| 72:22 162:13         | 147:8 149:25       | outstanding 59:24    | 133:3 134:16       |\n| offices<br>1:17      | 151:25 154:20      | overpayment          | 136:7 149:18       |\n| official 93:13,25    | 155:12,15 156:10   | 160:6                | 151:15 152:21      |\n| 94:21 187:9          | 157:11,19 160:5,8  | 81:18,19,20<br>owed  | 153:24 155:23      |\n| offset 78:7          | 160:25 161:11,16   | owned<br>114:3       | 156:11 158:8       |\n| 45:10 160:24<br>oh   | 161:17,23 162:2    | 126:22,25 127:16     | 159:19 160:2,3     |\n| 167:9 173:2          | 163:5,13,20 168:9  | 154:8                | 173:6 175:4,8,10   |\n| 177:14               | 169:7,12 184:19    | ownership<br>102:12  | 175:19 179:24      |\n| okay 9:7 35:17,22    | operations 127:20  | 107:9                | 181:10,12 183:4,6  |\n| 71:17 85:17 96:3     | opinion 145:20     | 115:5 116:5<br>owns  | 183:8,14           |\n| 103:2 131:11         | 151:5.7            | p                    | palm<br>122:14     |\n| 148:2 149:14         | opportunity 2:4    | 2:2,2 23:16<br>p     | pans<br>101:23     |\n| 159:6 173:8 181:6    | 4:20 6:14 10:24    | p&l 69:20            | 168:23<br>paper    |\n| old<br>169:3         | 38:20 75:20 81:4   | 1:15 2:17<br>p.C.    | papers 43:17,19    |\n| once 85:11 144:24    | oppose 29:6        | p.m. 39:10 90:25     | 44:16 45:3 46:3,6  |\n| 154:10               | opposed 74:6       | 139:21 140:4         | 126:14             |\n| ones 60:9 69:23      | 103:14             | 165:8,12 185:5,8     | paragraph<br>113:2 |\n| ongoing 52:6         | opposite<br>159:24 | pacific 2:3 4:19     | 113:2              |\n| 88:14 105:21         |                    | 6:13 10:23           |                    |\n|                      |                    |                      |                    |\n\n**[paramount** - **plan]**\n\n| paramount<br>29:3       | pass<br>44:9 130:25  | people<br>5: 15 16:2 | 139:9, 11, 12           |\n|-------------------------|----------------------|----------------------|-------------------------|\n| parcel<br>111 :25       | 139: 10              | 19:8,17,19 28:19     | 140:24 157: 17          |\n| parents<br>42:3         | passed<br>105:7,8    | 45:22 53:4 58:24     | 178:20 179:3            |\n| part<br>21:22 37: 17    | patents<br>120:4, 13 | 102: 17 117:24       | 181:23,24 182:2         |\n| 43:17 51:1169:9         | pax<br>100:6         | 118:7 141:24         | 183:9,10 184:4          |\n| 96:9,12,17 97:9,13      | pay<br>19: 13 54:22  | 142:2,4 168:24       | person's<br>27:23       |\n| 97:24 100: 12           | 55:3 68:2 118:20     | 175:16               | 182:5                   |\n| 105:20 111:25           | 154:9 171:6          | percent<br>118: 13   | personal<br>95: 12      |\n| 112:3 132:21            | payable<br>69:21     | 138: 19,21 139:4     | 97:25 101:4             |\n| 144:7 170:21            | payables<br>167:24   | 141:9,11,13,14       | 102:10                  |\n| 171:7,9 172:4           | payee<br>138: 11     | 142:7,8,9, 12,16,23  | personally<br>23 :9     |\n| 181:6                   | payees<br>137:7      | 143:6,8 144:2,5,6    | 65:17                   |\n| participate<br>47:2     | paying<br>107: 17    | 144: 13,14 145: 11   | perspective<br>31 :23   |\n| 47:17 60:8,12           | 146:24               | 146:4,5,11,11,21     | 77:16 85:7              |\n| participated<br>51: 13  | payment<br>33: 17    | percentage<br>136:6  | pertaining<br>146:21    |\n| 58:23 84:3              | 92:22 106:23         | 136:8 138: 13        | petition<br>32:22       |\n| participating           | 108:22 117:9         | 139:5 147:7          | 33:5,9, 16,20 35:24     |\n| 45:21                   | 133 :3,25 134: 11    | percentages          | 36:3,8 74: 13 84:6      |\n| participation           | 146: 19 154:7,13     | 136: 15 144: 19      | 92:22 132: 19           |\n| 45: 12 47: 10,20        | 154: 15 156:24       | perform<br>59: 15    | 133:3,3,25 160:2,2      |\n| particular<br>40:5, 12  | 159:17 175:13        | 66:1191:2593:3       | 160:3,3 172:5,20        |\n| 40: 16 42: 19 105:5     | 179:4                | 96:20 97: 10,16,21   | 174:25 176:5,8          |\n| 117: 17 118:6,23        | payments<br>83 :22   | 98:5,6 114: 13       | 177: 18,24 183:4        |\n| 130:17 168:25           | 84:6 86:16 93:2      | 125:22               | 183:11,14,16            |\n| particularly<br>14:9    | 132: 16,19 133:7,9   | performed<br>80:20   | 184:5,12                |\n| 112: 12                 | 133:10 134:2,6,16    | 83:5 88: 10 89: 18   | phone<br>15:3 25: 11    |\n| parties<br>3: 14 66 :22 | 134:22 154:5         | 97:20 121: 10,14     | 25: 15 28:8 47:20       |\n| 84:23 87:12             | 156:25 157:24        | period<br>72: 10     | 58:24 59:2, 11          |\n| 104:25 105:2            | 172:5 183:17,17      | 82: 16 86:20 90:25   | 104:24 143:15           |\n| 117:6 130:24            | 184: 11              | 117: 18 129:22       | 167:8 181:19            |\n| 133: 12 188: 14         | payroll<br>42:7      | 133:11140:13         | phones<br>3:10          |\n| partner<br>19: 12       | pays<br>122:4        | 151: 15 153 :25      | phrase<br>110:2         |\n| 20:3 51:3               | pc<br>10:25 48:9,20  | 154:20 155: 11, 17   | physically<br>123:5     |\n| partnership<br>74: 10   | 49:4                 | 156: 12 157:25       | pick<br>3:7             |\n| 75:23                   | pdf 95:18            | 159:9                | place<br>3:10,14        |\n| parts<br>79: 12         | pearl<br>2:18        | perjury<br>8:8       | 45:22 47:15 53:8        |\n| party<br>4:7 20:22      | penalty<br>8:8       | person<br>5:12,15    | 77:6 82:20 83 :25       |\n| 44:4 53: 10 99: 11      | pendency<br>70:9     | 15:18,2126:15,17     | 175:24 186: 11          |\n| 102: 14 119:24          | 117: 19              | 49:20 50:17 51:5     | plan<br>86:6, 11, 13,24 |\n| 122:6 173: 12           | pending<br>9: 11     | 54:4 103: 15         | 87: 15,24 122:2         |\n| 184: 10                 | 81:25 82:5           | 129: 18 130: 10,10   | 169:17                  |\n\n| planned 54:19      | 120:17             | prepare<br>13:4       | previously 6:10      |\n|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|\n| plans 86:14 88:7   | possibly<br>118:3  | 24:13,14 71:11,12     | 14-23 85-20          |\n| 125:3              | 169:6 171:17       | 71:23 95:3 100:9      | 104:10 119:18        |\n| platforms<br>120:8 | post 20:17 32:22   | 173.5                 | 130:4                |\n| 120:20             | 33:5,9,16,20 35:24 | prepared 13:10,14     | primary<br>143:10    |\n| play 52:10 169:18  | 36:3,8 61:11       | 24:15 31:19 71:3      | principal 21:17      |\n| 169:20 171:7       | 63:12 133:3 160:2  | 71:19 86:12           | 22:24 23:3 37:23     |\n| 172:2,3,3          | 174:25 176:5,8     | 161:15 173:18         | 50:5,10,16,25 51:8   |\n| plays 52:11        | 177:18,24 183:11   | 183:12                | printed 119:11       |\n| pleadings 14:8     | 184:5, 12          | preparer 135:4,6      | 82:17 83:23<br>prior |\n| please 3:5,9 4:15  | posted 120:8,19    | 136:9 173:4 174:9     | priority<br>81:7     |\n| 5:10,19 6:3 8:19   | potential 24:10    | preparing 8:12        | privacy<br>29:2      |\n| 9:5,11 11:8 23:14  | 52:9 65:11,15,22   | 15:6 45:6,11,12       | private<br>3:7       |\n| 28:11 33:2 35:15   | 85:21              | 46:14 55:24 56:7      | privilege 39:23,25   |\n| 67:22 148:5,14     | potentially 27:20  | 57:24 58:21 60:23     | 40:17 83:15          |\n| 165:2              | 66:6 78:17 90:14   | 66:20,21 84:4         | privileged 41:3      |\n| plus 72:10 106:7,7 | 101:23<br>pots     | 86:18 94:7,11         | 14:24<br>probably    |\n| 135:18 140:17      | practice 121:21    | 105:11 109:6          | 20:20 24:11 28:9     |\n| 2:14<br>po         | practitioner       | 110:12 112:9,21       | 32:9 42:10 45:4      |\n| pohl 23:10,15,17   | 176:13             | 132:4 155:3.6         | 52:15,16,19 54:5     |\n| 23:24 24:4         | pre 74:13 84:6     | 161:2169:11           | 106:8,8,9 110:17     |\n| point 39:14 40:18  | 92:22 132:19       | 170:5,6               | 116:23 137:8         |\n| 48:14 52:20 60:6   | 133:3,25 160:2,3,3 | presence 120:25       | 138:21 144:5         |\n| 61:8 65:25 67:10   | 172:5,20 177:18    | present 2:21 4:10     | 170:23 176:19        |\n| 75:3 81:11 92:20   | 177:24 183:4,14    | presenting 155:13     | 80:3<br>problem      |\n| 106:17 123:23      | 183:16             | presidential<br>19:19 | 146:25 160:24        |\n| 124:13 130:14      | precursor<br>17:11 | presumably 54:22      | 162.16               |\n| 153:22 166:3       | predicated<br>72:3 | 68:20                 | 11:3<br>procedure    |\n| 171:10             | 157:10             | presuming 114:6       | 17:19                |\n| points 25:2 55:17  | predict 53:7,13    | presupposed           | procedures 7:23      |\n| policies 121:17    | prefer<br>33:15    | 55:10                 | 70:13                |\n| policy 121:18,22   | preference 33:9    | presupposes<br>70:15  | proceed 11:20        |\n| 121:24 122:8       | 33:14 82:10,18     | presupposing          | 140:5 165:13         |\n| populated 95:23    | 84:2 171:18        | 66:14                 | proceeding 4:15      |\n| ported 49:23       | preferences 82:16  | pretty 21:11 22:9     | 16:22                |\n| poses 37:2         | preparation 13:20  | 32:7 37:4 44:22       | proceedings 39:19    |\n| possession 37:25   | 15:751:953:5       | 70:5 179:11           | 39:21,22 115:10      |\n| 38:3 52:14         | 55:19 56:20 60:19  | previous 36:21        | process 38:14        |\n| possible 30:17,25  | 61:9 68:6 73:16    | 38:6 78:7,10          | 40:13 67:21 155:9    |\n| 31:6 35:25 60:7    | 86:7 112:4 116:22  | 116:8 119:6           | 168:7,22 169:23      |\n| 79:6 82:9 84:12    | 168:10             |                       | 178:11               |\n|                    |                    |                       |                      |\n\n| produce<br>8: 13       | 152: 16 153: 16,25    | q                    | r                      |\n|------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|------------------------|\n| produced<br>128:25     | proponent<br>118: 12  | qpc<br>31:23         | r<br>2:2 5:21,21 6:5   |\n| 137: 19 147: 16        | proposed<br>5:4,7     | quarter<br>72:8 73:9 | 48:25 186:2 188:2      |\n| 173:12,13,16           | 54:20 111 :20         | 73:10                | rang<br>167:8 176:10   |\n| product<br>46:22       | 139:3 150:21          | quarterly<br>68:7    | range<br>15:13         |\n| 83:15,17               | protect<br>75:9 89:16 | 71: 19,21,25 72: 18  | rank<br>29:5           |\n| profession<br>166:3    | 179:4                 | queries<br>158: 18   | rarely<br>42:21 81: 18 |\n| professional<br>17: 14 | protected<br>29: 14   | question<br>8:20 9:5 | rate<br>67:10,11       |\n| 17: 17,25 18:8, 12     | protection<br>83: 18  | 9:7,11,19,20 27:4    | reached<br>23:17,24    |\n| 33:1137:22 77:17       | protective<br>29: 15  |                      |                        |\n| 92:21 156:4 158:3      | prove<br>86:22        | 27:6 28:9 34:8, 12   | 28:20 161:12           |\n| 163:3 166:7            | provide<br>22: 18     | 34:16,18,19 36:17    | 162:12,25              |\n| 175: 19,20             | 92:25 171: 11,15      | 36: 19,25 38: 17     | reaching<br>161:13     |\n| professionals<br>14:8  | provided<br>13:14     | 53:17 56:9 83:20     | read<br>27:6 34: 12    |\n| 30:21 54:9,23          | 59:5 98: 11 99: 10    | 94: 19,21 96: 17     | 57:18 65:24 90:16      |\n| 57:9 62:8 68:25        | 117:3 130:9           | 101: 12 105: 16      | 120: 16 147:25         |\n| 77:25 156:5,5,6,7      | 140:24 158: 15        | 108:3,8 110:7,8      | reads<br>55:18 61:8    |\n| 156:8 157:2,3          | providers<br>92:21    | 113:14 114:14        | 63:18 80:17 88:20      |\n| 159:25 175:20          | providing<br>27: 14   | 115: 13 116:21       | 94:20,24 95:11         |\n| 181:8                  | 63:21                 | 117:4 118:3 119:4    | 105:21 106: 12         |\n| profile<br>166:10,19   | public<br>1 :20 5 :23 | 120:3,12 121:16      | 113:18 115:15          |\n| 178:14 179:6,18        | 186:22 188:6          | 122: 11 124: 13      | ready<br>137:21        |\n| program<br>69: 12      | pulling<br>134: 14    | 126:5 127:22         | real<br>42:20 77:20    |\n| 70:11                  | pullman<br>2:12 5:7   | 130: 18,20 148: 19   | 94:22 107:6            |\n|                        |                       | 149:6,12,25 150:3    | 113:19,22 114:2,4      |\n| progress<br>71:9       | 165: 17               | 151: 19,23 154:2     | 147:6 167:20           |\n| progresses<br>50:22    | punching<br>99: 11    | 155:16 163:10,12     | realized<br>159:24     |\n| projections<br>61: 10  | punitive<br>164:9     | 163:12 166:14        | really<br>31:274:21    |\n| 61:24,24 86:18         | purchase<br>117: 12   | 177: 13,21 181: 15   | 133:2 165:4            |\n| 87:10                  | 118: 19               | 184: 10,12           | reason<br>10:8 76: 15  |\n| prominent<br>60: 18    | purchased<br>117: 13  | questions<br>47: 17  | 78: 13 89:4 138:22     |\n| promised<br>179:23     | purposes<br>39:23,25  | 83:21 91:3 99:21     | 142:4,19 143:4,10      |\n| prompted<br>163:17     | 77:24                 | 100:6,23 113:5       | 145: 16                |\n| proof 80:24 81 :2      | pursuant<br>10:25     | 119: 19,21 129: 16   | reasonable<br>21: 13   |\n| 81:21                  | pushed<br>168:23      | 135:25 149:2         | reasonableness         |\n| proofs<br>80: 19       | put<br>44: 18 69: 16  | 153:5 158:5          | 109: 14 110:3          |\n| properly<br>136:2      | 131:12 142:7          | 164: 15 167: 17      | 158: 10                |\n| property<br>94: 15,21  | 155:24                | 179: 17 184:8,23     | reasonably<br>53: 11   |\n| 95:12 107:7            | puts<br>87: 18        | quick<br>165:4       | reasoning<br>29:21     |\n| 113:17 114:2           | putting<br>109:14     | quickbooks<br>60:25  | 142:17 143:21          |\n| 120:7, 13, 15, 18      | 180:22                | quickly<br>159:6     | 144:8,11145:10         |\n| 122: 11 148:5,14       |                       |                      | 145:12,21              |\n\n**[reasons** - **report]**\n\n| reasons<br>75:2 77:23  | record<br>3 :3, 15 4: 13 | refers<br>84:11 95:13   | relied<br>85:5 104:9  |\n|------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------|-----------------------|\n| 130:3 142: 11          | 6:4,11,11 8:12           | 95: 17 96:2 114: 16     | 177:15 178:6          |\n| 168: 15                | 11: 13, 15, 16,20        | 119:4 120:5,12          | relief 75:4,6         |\n| recall<br>23 :20 32:6  | 28:2, 18 32: 15          | 121:4, 17 122: 13       | relies<br>84:22       |\n| 33 :8 34:7 44: 10      | 41:10 48:5 90:19         | 125:8 126:6,7           | rely<br>39:2 98:13    |\n| 57:21 65:20            | 90:2191:293:18           | 127:23 135: 13          | 123:25 139:6          |\n| 126: 17 128:4          | 100:4 129:5 130:4        | 144:20                  | 158: 14 176:4         |\n| 146:10,13 151:4        | 139: 19,21 140:4         | reflect<br>132: 10      | 177:23 179:5          |\n| 151:10 161:9           | 156:9 165:4,8,9,12       | 133:8 140:22            | remain<br>106: 16,24  |\n| 173:22                 | 185:2,5 188: 11          | reflected<br>13 3 : 14  | 107:18                |\n| receipt<br>78: 13      | recorded<br>1: 14        | 135: 15 152:8           | remains<br>74: 12     |\n| receipts<br>52: 17     | 3:17                     | reflecting<br>164:5     | 184:14                |\n| 54:3,14,15 63: 15      | recording<br>3:13        | refresh<br>36: 16       | remember<br>21: 14    |\n| 66:25 68:22 86: 19     | 8:10                     | regarding<br>15: 17     | 24:7 43: 14,24        |\n| receivable<br>69:22    | records<br>15:9,20,23    | 16:4,4 24:2,9 25:5      | 59:2 62:22 81:3       |\n| receive<br>57: 15      | 40:14 49:22 52:16        | 26:4, 11 30: 14         | 85:24 87:5 105:2      |\n| 137: 10 157: 15        | 82:9 84:12,14,18         | 59:21 65: 14,19         | 105:5,15 108:7        |\n| 174:24                 | 92: 19 160:22            | 67:25 102: 15           | 109:20 110:8          |\n| received<br>33:20      | 171:16,20 172:17         | 111:16 137:13           | 116: 19 117:4         |\n| 92:22 99:17            | recoverable<br>83 :2     | 150:3 161: 10           | 127: 19 130:22        |\n| 104: 11 137: 13        | recoveries<br>175: 15    | 163:4                   | 142: 13 146: 16       |\n| 139:7 140:6            | rectified<br>135:5       | regret<br>168:2         | 159:13 167:12         |\n| 160: 10                | redacted<br>129: 17      | rejoin<br>41:14         | 173: 10 176:7         |\n| receiving<br>33:9      | 182:6, 16,25             | related<br>4:7 19:7     | remind<br>167: 10     |\n| 161:9                  | redaction<br>130:6       | 49:2156:961:10          | remotely<br>4: 11     |\n| recess<br>90:22        | refer<br>97:4,25         | 90:3 91:4 95: 14        | renters<br>107:7      |\n| 139:22                 | referenced<br>68: 10     | 138:23 143:5,11         | reorganization        |\n| recognize<br>10:20     | 103: 11, 12, 13          | 188: 14                 | 86: 11 168:21         |\n| 48: 15 49:6 93:21      | 119:23 155:5             | relates<br>7:3,8 94: 15 | 169:15                |\n| 111: 11 140:9          | 159: 10,15               | 107: 16 111:21          | repair<br>107:8       |\n| 147:20,22              | references<br>63: 11     | 173: 16                 | 144:22                |\n| recollection<br>36: 16 | 113:4,7 119:6            | relating<br>6:23        | repairs<br>158:22     |\n| 44:21 162:24           | referencing<br>65 :7     | 70:14                   | repeat<br>9:5 27:3    |\n| recommend<br>73 :23    | referred<br>27:5         | relationship            | repeating<br>66: 17   |\n| 73:24 74:2 75:7        | 174:5                    | 143:19                  | report<br>40: 11 45:7 |\n| 75: 17,22 76: 11       | referring<br>71: 15      | relevance<br>28:21      | 46: 11 51: 12 54:6    |\n| 80:9 141: 10           | 95:20 97:4,7, 14         | 88:11                   | 67:8 68: 11, 19,23    |\n| recommended            | 104:3 120:9              | relevant<br>27:24       | 69:7, 10, 13 70:3,6   |\n| 144:21                 | 132: 12 135:9            | 41:4 113:23             | 70:10,15,19 71:2,4    |\n| reconciling<br>80: 18  | 150:6 167: 16            | 116:21 117: 14          | 71:9,19,21,25 72:4    |\n|                        |                          | 123:11                  | 72: 18,21 107:22      |\n|                        |                          |                         |                       |\n\n85\n\n**[report** - **right]**\n\n| 108:2,2,9 117:5, 15   | representations       | responds<br>52:4      | 55: 13 61:8 88: 12     |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------------------|\n| 118: 11 122: 16,22    | 59:21                 | 149:15                | 111:21 126: 14         |\n| 123:8 124:6           | representative        | response<br>35:23     | 175:22                 |\n| 130: 15,21 132:3      | 180:5                 | 115:14                | retrieved<br>31: 8, 12 |\n| 132:25 134:4,6,24     | represented<br>9: 12  | responses<br>12:7     | return<br>53:2,3       |\n| 135: 11 144:9         | 20:2121:10,12         | responsibilities      | 74:23 75:6,8           |\n| 147:8 149:25          | 102:22 113:12         | 21:20 46: 10,18       | 76:12,14 77:2,22       |\n| 151:25 154:20         | representing<br>9: 16 | responsible<br>20:2   | 77:23 78: 14 79: 15    |\n| 155:12,15 156:10      | 100:5 181:13          | 98:12                 | 79:17,18 86:23         |\n| 157: 12,23,23         | request<br>26: 19     | responsive<br>124: 15 | 168:9 173:5            |\n| 158: 13 159:8,20      | 108:9 163:18          | rest<br>17:24         | returns<br>54: 10 74:3 |\n| 160:5,8,25 161: 11    | require<br>47:9 60:7  | restrictions<br>153:2 | 74:9 75:24 76:5,6      |\n| 161:16,17 163:5       | required<br>12: 14,19 | restroom<br>139: 17   | 78: 18 79:9, 11        |\n| 163: 13 184:20        | 17: 19,22 54:25       | restructure           | 80:10 169:9 173:3      |\n| reported<br>71:2      | 55:2 70: 10 76:2      | 167:22                | 173:6,11,18            |\n| 157:5 160:7           | 89:5 108: 14          | res tru ctu red       | revealed<br>26: 18     |\n| reporter<br>1 :20 4:4 | requirement<br>67:7   | 170:16,21             | revealing<br>27: 19    |\n| 5:10,19 8:11          | requirements          | restructuring         | 28:22                  |\n| 10:13,18 27:7         | 42:24,24 67:5         | 17:24 18:7 165:19     | revenue<br>80: 14      |\n| 32:12,20 35:7,14      | requires<br>68:24     | 166:11,13,16,20       | review<br>27:22        |\n| 47:23 48:4 78:9       | 86:25 89:10           | 166:24 167:7,16       | 43:22 51:23 52:19      |\n| 93:11,16 111:3,10     | reside<br>150: 15     | 167:21 170: 11,21     | 53:10 60:7 61:9        |\n| 128:23 129: 13        | 172: 17               | resuming<br>139:23    | 62: 12 68:6 72: 17     |\n| 131:18,19 140:2       | residence<br>101:5,9  | retain<br>48: 8, 19   | 73: 16 124:20          |\n| 147:12,14 171:13      | 102:5 113: 16         | 49:3 181:7            | 125:17 135:24          |\n| 187: 15               | 114:6,9 118:6, 10     | retained<br>34:6      | 150: 19 158:2          |\n| reporting<br>19: 18   | 150: 13               | 36:22 37:6 39:7       | 162:5 171:19           |\n| 42:23 52: 18 54:2     | residences<br>19: 14  | 39: 15,18,20 72: 17   | reviewed<br>13 :8, 11  |\n| 66:21 67:4 68:8       | 114: 14 118:3         | 143:11187:15          | 62: 18,20 81:24        |\n| 108: 14 148:24        | resident<br>76: 12    | retainer<br>32:22,24  | 84: 13, 18 109: 13     |\n| 149:3 155:6, 10       | resides<br>114:5      | 32:25 33 :5, 10, 12   | 110:3 112:24           |\n| reports<br>22: 19     | 118:5                 | 33: 16,20 35:24       | 114:21 141:3           |\n| 66:21 68:7 107:22     | respect<br>21 :20     | 36:4,8 126:6          | reviewing<br>80: 17    |\n| 116:22 117: 16        | 92:25 95:7            | 174:25 175:17         | 82:8 112:11            |\n| 157: 19 161:23        | respond<br>89: 11     | 176:5,8 177: 19,24    | 160:15 171:16          |\n| 162:3 168:9 169:7     | 178:24,24             | retaining<br>34:5     | revising<br>139:5      |\n| 169: 12               | responded<br>36:20    | 35:21 36: 18 37:3     | rhode<br>176: 15,21    |\n| represent<br>30:2     | 65:4                  | 39:4                  | right<br>7: 10 10: 19  |\n| 129:7 140: 16         | responding<br>35: 18  | retains<br>74:7 162:6 | 38: 19 53 :24 55 :22   |\n| 144: 13 17 6: 1 7, 19 | 51: 16                | retention<br>7:8      | 61:3 62:16 63:6        |\n|                       |                       | 43:16,17,19 44:16     | 64: 16 70: 17 71:6     |\n\n[ **right** - **server]**\n\n| 73 :4 81: 15 84:9     | 178:7 181:3,5         | 124:25 128:3                          | 142:20,24 143:3,5     |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|\n| 90:7 94:8 95:21       | rudnick's<br>126: 14  | 135:5,7,9 136:10                      | 143:10,23 159:14      |\n| 98:2 100: 11          | rule<br>10:25 11:22   | 155:25                                | 184:3                 |\n| 126: 19 130: 11       | rules<br>11 :2 117:5  | scheduled<br>81:14                    | see<br>11:23 28:21    |\n| 134: 12 136: 19       | 161:3                 | schedules<br>14:6                     | 33:6 35:25 45:22      |\n| 138:5 152:5           | ruling<br>29: 12      | 30:23 44:22 45:25                     | 57:19 61:12 68:8      |\n| 153: 17,20 154:22     | run<br>22:2 58:9      | 51: 10 55 :20,25                      | 82:11,25 88:11        |\n| 165:20 169: 16        | 67:10,11178:21        | 56: 14 57: 12,17,25                   | 95:17 96:6 121:8      |\n| 170:8 173:23          | running<br>21 :23     | 58: 17,22 60:20,24                    | 121:19 125:6          |\n| 177: 14               | 172:9,10              | 69:4 100:10                           | 132:15 141:2          |\n| rights<br>29:2        | runs<br>178:22        | 111: 16 112:2,5                       | 148:9 151: 16         |\n| road<br>113:20        | russo<br>2:6 4:24,24  | 113:6 168:8                           | 155:21 159:2,3        |\n| rodeo<br>89:3         | s                     | 183:13                                | 168:5 183 :20         |\n| role<br>50:7, 12 52:9 |                       | schindler<br>13:8                     | seeing<br>57:21       |\n| 53:18 94:6,10         | s<br>2:2 74: 10 187:2 | 31:25 49: 16 50:9                     | 127:19                |\n| 98:11102:3            | safe<br>123:10        | 56:5,24 112: 18                       | seek<br>124: 10,12    |\n| 105:25 106:3          | safety<br>13 8 :24    | school<br>17:3,5                      | seen<br>79:8, 12      |\n| 112:9 134:21          | 144: 10 182: 11       | science<br>17:7                       | 109:15 121:23         |\n| 168: 11 169: 17,20    | sales<br>42:7         | scope<br>43:8 44:12                   | 127:24 128: 19        |\n| 171:25 172:4          | sanity<br>158:9       | 90: 13 171:9                          | 137:6 145:7 164:8     |\n| roles<br>23:2 51: 18  | save<br>162:4         | scotch<br>164:22                      | 164:13                |\n| roll<br>157:4         | saw<br>62:22 79: 13   | scrambling<br>69:4                    | select<br>75:20       |\n| rolled<br>158: 15     | 79: 15 126: 13        | scratch<br>71: 11                     | sell<br>122:6         |\n| room<br>4: 11 127: 12 | 128:4 153:4           | 99:16 106:2                           | semantics<br>39: 13   |\n| rudnick<br>2:8 5:4    | 159:23 162: 19        | search<br>15: 19,20                   | senators<br>19: 19    |\n| 15:21 23: 10, 16      | 163:13 173:3          | 49:21 82:25                           | send<br>15:21 24: 15  |\n| 24:6,8,18 25:9        | saying<br>37:9 149:20 | second<br>45: 16 61:7                 | 162:7                 |\n| 26:5,6, 11 30:9       | 149:21 162: 13        | 114:16 121:6                          | sense<br>38:2 158:4   |\n|                       | says<br>33:434:15     |                                       |                       |\n| 31:20 32:4 38: 10     | 87:7 91:23 116:6      | 125:2                                 | 158:25                |\n| 38: 12 39:2, 16       | 116:7 162:7, 15       | secret<br>106:21                      | sensitive<br>3 :6     |\n| 43 :23 49:24 56: 13   | 184:9, 10             | secrets<br>120: 14                    | sent<br>13:17 31:20   |\n| 57:4 58:25 59:7       | scared<br>143: 16, 18 | section<br>75:5 97:17                 | 49:24                 |\n| 59:10,17 64:20        | 143:19                | 105:23 106:4                          | sentence<br>121:6     |\n| 83:18 98:25 99:7      | scenarios<br>20: 14   | 114: 19                               | 125:2                 |\n| 102:12,18 103:18      | schedule<br>59:22     | secure<br>167:22                      | separate<br>74:4,5,14 |\n| 103:18 104:11,17      | 60:3 71:14 81:14      | secured<br>20: 19                     | 74:22 107:21          |\n| 104: 17 105:7,13      | 94:7,20,23 95: 12     | 21:7 42:15 81:7                       | 129:5 131 :7 132:7    |\n| 106:6 109:24          | 96: 13 98:23 103 :9   | security<br>3 3: 17                   | septem her<br>17: 10  |\n| 112: 14 124:2         | 103:23 104:8          | 115:24 118:8,25                       | served<br>7:5         |\n| 126:7 139:7 156:2     |                       |                                       |                       |\n| 157:15 175:18         | 108: 12 109: 16,17    | 133:23 138:16,22<br>138:24 142: 14,18 | server<br>13:24 49:22 |\n\n85\n\n[ **service** - **started]**\n\n| service<br>92:21            | signature<br>188:21      | someday<br>169: 17     | spent<br>21:23                          |\n|-----------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| 138: 11 145:5,5             | signer<br>37:24 52: 14   | someone's<br>171:4     | split<br>118: 18                        |\n| services<br>18:24           | 65:3                     | someplace<br>110:21    | spoke<br>13:5,714:15                    |\n| 21:21 85:21 90:4            | significant<br>13 :9     | son<br>58:9,11,13      | 14:2116:8 31:2                          |\n| set<br>101:7 161:8          | 59:5                     | soon<br>159:4          | 57:6                                    |\n| 188:10,19                   | significantly            | sorry<br>3:57:14       | spoken<br>14:24                         |\n| setting<br>47:5 83:17       | 160: 14                  | 23:1135:341:7          | 174: 11,18,22                           |\n| settlement<br>78:6          | silverberg<br>13 :6      | 83:1194:1995:16        | spouse<br>118: 14                       |\n| 171:2                       | 24:5 33:4 34:4           | 126:4 130:19           | 145: 18 150: 14                         |\n| settlements<br>77: 10       | 37:2 38:5 39:6           | 171:13 176:11          | spouse's<br>121: 18                     |\n| seven<br>75:15              | silverberg' s<br>3 5: 19 | sort<br>52:8 55:6      | spreads<br>21:25                        |\n| 136: 18                     | similar<br>113: 17       | sorts<br>17: 15 42:23  | spreadsheet                             |\n| seventh<br>92: 19           | simultaneously           | 54: 15 167:25          | 135: 14 158:6                           |\n| shake<br>8:24               | 44:23                    | sound<br>84:9          | 160:19                                  |\n| shape<br>62:10              | single<br>53: 10 75:22   | source<br>62:24        | spring<br>2:17 5:16                     |\n| shapes<br>42:2              | sir<br>85:16100:6,14     | 77: 12 87:25 105:2     | 27:17,18 28:17,23                       |\n| shea<br>2:17                | 153: 18                  | 175:7,8,13,25          | 29:6 57:24 58:3                         |\n| sheet<br>69:20 131: 14      | sitting<br>19:25         | spatulas<br>101 :22    | 179:6,9,12 180:6,7                      |\n| 133: 15 138: 16             | situation<br>104:20      | speak<br>14:18 15:14   | 180: 10,15,20                           |\n| 158: 12                     | 121:23                   | 23:25 24:9,17          | 181: 17,20 182:20                       |\n| sheets<br>109:4             | six<br>162:10            | 25:5,10 26:2           | 183 :5,8 184:6                          |\n| sherry<br>114: 17,25        | size<br>42:2             | 44:17 144:25           | spring's<br>28:8                        |\n| 146:21,25 150:5             | slipping<br>87:4         | 174:20,21181:24        | 182:10,15,19                            |\n| 150:16,17 151:16            | small<br>45: 12 88:5     | speaking<br>35:20      | springs<br>26: 19                       |\n| 153:20 154: 11              | 134:17 173:17            | 115:7,14 151:10        | 28:10,14                                |\n| sherry's<br>146:25          | social<br>120:23,24      | specific<br>14:7 51:11 | square<br>1: 18 2:4,9                   |\n| shit<br>176: 11             | sofa<br>55:25 56:14      | 94: 17 100: 12,14      | 3:25                                    |\n| short<br>104:20             | 57: 12, 17,24 58: 16     | 100:19 101:2           | ss<br>188:4                             |\n| 139:22                      | 58:22 59:22 60:2         | 104:4 110:24           | stab<br>43:22                           |\n| shorthand<br>1:20           | 94:7 98:23 109: 16       | 111: 19 112: 12,20     | staff 20:4 24: 12                       |\n| show<br>146:9               | sofa's<br>14:5 44:21     | 157:25                 | 51: 17 52:8,9,24                        |\n| showed<br>141:24            | 45:25 51:10 60:19        | specifically<br>20:25  | 53:14,17,20 54:4,7                      |\n| 159:22                      | 60: 19,23 69:4           | 43:15 51:7 72:20       | 66:20                                   |\n| showing<br>101: 19          | 83:22 112:2 113:5        | specifics<br>83:10,16  | stamp<br>129:2                          |\n| shown<br>132:21             | 168:8 170:5              | specified<br>186: 11   | stamped<br>35:9                         |\n| 147:7                       | software<br>60:16,18     | speculate<br>127:4     | standard<br>70:8                        |\n| shows<br>117:20             | 61:2,5                   | speculation<br>93 :6   | 121:21                                  |\n| 158:5,21,23                 | sole<br>52: 14           | spell<br>23: 12, 13    | start<br>6: 17 7:22                     |\n| siblings<br>42:4            | solely<br>104:9          | spend<br>15:5 78:4     | 79:25                                   |\n| signatory<br>38:23<br>66:18 | somebody<br>183:7        | 165:25                 | started<br>17: 11 23 :4<br>45:6 153:4,7 |\n|                             |                          |                        |                                         |\n\n[ **started** - **team]**\n\n| 162: 18 182:21          | stricken<br>29: 14    | supported<br>36:21                 | 77:6 82:20 111:23       |\n|-------------------------|-----------------------|------------------------------------|-------------------------|\n| starting<br>33:14       | strike<br>25 :4 30:6  | supporting<br>51: 17               | 134: 17 139: 18         |\n| 83 :25 97:9 109:5       | 116:20 157: 13        | supports<br>60: 18                 | 165:3 173:2             |\n| 130: 14                 | structured<br>65 :23  | supposed<br>74:20                  | 179:25 184:25           |\n| starts<br>96: 17        | 66:7                  | 162: 17 167: 12                    | taken<br>79:4 90:23     |\n| 109:21                  | stub<br>72:9          | sure<br>7:4, 11,23                 | 139:23                  |\n| state<br>1:20 4: 12, 15 | stuff 30:25 168:7     | 27: 16 31 :24 32:2                 | takes<br>47: 15         |\n| 5:23 6:3 27:2           | subject<br>8:7 12: 11 | 32:7 37:4 38: 12                   | talk<br>7:20 8: 18 17:2 |\n| 42:22 73: 17 76: 16     | 14:2 29:14 53:10      | 38:13 43:13,21                     | 80:7 146:3              |\n| 76:16 79:14 101:3       | 147:23                | 44:19 73:4 75:10                   | talked<br>16:3 21: 18   |\n| 156:5 188:3,7           | subscribed<br>186: 18 | 81:8 88:13 99:22                   | 30: 10, 15 46:2,9, 13   |\n| stated<br>26: 17        | substantively         | 104:6 110: 13,14                   | 55: 14 59:9 127:9       |\n| 164: 10 171: 19         | 149:5                 | 110:16 113:3,8,11                  | 128: 12,16 129:20       |\n| statement<br>14:5       | subtract<br>133:6     | 124:8 125:25                       | 134: 10 137:24          |\n| 34:12 37:2154:6         | success<br>82:5       | 127: 14 129:6                      | 154:25 158: 16          |\n| 55:19 73:6 111:17       | successful<br>86: 10  | 135:25 136: 10                     | 164:3                   |\n| 112:4 158:8             | suffering<br>9:24     | 137: 16 141:5                      | talking<br>29:25        |\n| statements<br>8:25      | sufficient<br>42: 12  | 150:25 158:4,11                    | 64: 15 79:23 85:2       |\n| 69:19 111:14            | suggested<br>143:6    | 165:6 167: 13                      | 96:12 98:25 103:8       |\n| states<br>1:23:19       | suggesting<br>142:12  | 173 :25 174:23                     | 104 :4 13 8: 19         |\n| 42:6 54:23 62:5         | 142:17                | 176:7 179: 11                      | 146: 13 160: 16, 16     |\n| 69:11,19 71:20          | suggestion<br>145:24  | surprise<br>83 :24                 | 160: 17 162: 18         |\n| 72:2,22 157:7           | suggestions<br>141:3  | surrounding                        | task<br>89:4            |\n| 162:8 171:11            | 141:8                 | 182:12                             | tasks<br>88:22 170:2    |\n| 176: 19                 | suite<br>2: 18 6:8    | suspect<br>170:25                  | 170:7                   |\n| statistical<br>94:3     | sum<br>72: 11 96: 17  | swear<br>5:10,19                   | tax<br>19:21,22 52:25   |\n| statute<br>75: 16       | 135:17                | swearing<br>8:4                    | 53:3,4 54:8,9           |\n| 82:22                   | summarized            | sworn<br>5:22 186:5                | 73: 17 74:3,8 75:6      |\n| statutes<br>75: 16      | 155:24                | 186: 18 188: 10                    | 75:7,24 76: 14          |\n| statutorily<br>72:24    | summary<br>94:2       | system<br>60: 10                   | 77:2,16,22,24 78:3      |\n| stay<br>18:2 123:9,13   | 129:21 130:9          | t                                  | 78:17 79:9,11           |\n| stays<br>123:8          | 153:3                 |                                    | 80:8,10 168:9           |\n| step<br>13: 19 46:2     | sun<br>59: 14         | t<br>5:21 6:5 186:2                | 169:9 173 :3,5,6, 11    |\n| 69:25                   | supplement            | 187:2 188:2,2                      | 173: 18                 |\n| stepping<br>49: 13      | 132:24                | tab<br>10: 12 32: 11               | taxation<br>19:9 22:2   |\n| steven<br>23 :9, 15,24  | support<br>19:6 22:4  | 34:22 131:2 146:7                  | taxes<br>42:7,7 53:5    |\n| 24:4                    | 22:8 40:6 49:2        | table<br>49:9, 10 50:4             | 73:24 74: 17 77:20      |\n| street<br>2:13,186:8    | 51 :24,24 55 :21      | taconic<br>113 :20<br>tail<br>45:4 | 107:6                   |\n| stretto<br>89:22 90:8   | 85: 19 112:6          | take<br>3: 13 9: 10                | taxing<br>75: 11        |\n| 90:14 92:5,10,14        | 162:21 172:8          | 14:25 31:25 33:3                   | team<br>55:7 56:20      |\n| 92:24                   |                       | 35:15 53:8 67:5                    | 59: 10 106:6,6          |\n|                         |                       |                                    |                         |\n\n85\n\n[team - top]\n\n| 109:24 110:16        | thing 19:17 64:19  | 172:11 173:16,17   | 44:24 45:19 52:20     |\n|----------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|\n| 138:19,20 153:13     | 66:3 79:13 117:23  | 177:12 178:16.16   | 60:6 65:25 81:11      |\n| 172:9,12             | 120:10 122:14      | 178:17 179:3       | 86:17,20 90:20,24     |\n| technical 56:9       | 124:21 135:12      | 181:19 182:22      | 97:3 104:21 106:8     |\n| 74:22<br>technically | 157:2 162:15       | 183:21 184:20      | 116:13 117:18         |\n| 169:6<br>technology  | things 6:21 22:5   | thinking 40:8      | 118:23 123:24         |\n| teleconference       | 51:21 54:18 69:14  | 117:7 123:12       | 136:13 137:11         |\n| 2:19                 | 100:24 124:4       | 149:9              | 138:2 139:20          |\n| telephone 45:15      | 156:22 161:2       | third 63:18 64:15  | 140:3 146:23          |\n| tell 124:19,24       | 167:19 179:2       | 117:6 119:24       | 154:5 155:20          |\n| 127:3 135:8          | think 9:14 14:11   | 122:6 130:24       | 156:14,22 157:11      |\n| 154:14 184:15        | 14:12 16:17 18:15  | 133:12 184:10      | 157:25 159:25         |\n| telling 118:21       | 19:8 20:20 21:9    | thirds<br>184:2    | 160:14,15,21          |\n| 7:17 15:11<br>ten    | 24:13 28:25 30:16  | thought 37:12      | 162:6 165:7.11        |\n| tense 85:3,3,4       | 30:20 31:2,5 34:6  | 38:18 46:25 56:21  | 174:2,10 178:25       |\n| 87:4 125:13<br>term  | 34:11 36:13,19,22  | 95:14 114:2        | 179:12 186:10         |\n| testified 5:24 6:15  | 37:5,10 39:7,13,21 | 126:15 127:15      | 80:10 145:9<br>timely |\n| 88:9                 | 40:9 43:9 45:10    | 138:20 142:7       | times 1:18 2:4,9      |\n| testify 10:2,9 12:2  | 45:24 47:19 49:13  | 153:9,13 161:21    | 3:25 6:18 7:15        |\n| 12:14,21 40:15       | 51:3 52:12 55:4    | 174:6 175:12       | 14:24 60:14           |\n| 41:2 186:5           | 56:10 60:8,17,20   | thoughts<br>151:3  | 104:23 177:11         |\n| testifying 7:25      | 70:6 73:22 76:20   | thousand 126:6     | timing 78:24 79:5     |\n| 11:5 28:16           | 79:18 81:10,22     | 132:21,22 140:17   | 134:25                |\n| testimony 10:6       | 85:19 87:8 90:5    | 146:19 152:7       | timothy 2:19 5:15     |\n| 22:19 185:6 186:6    | 91:18 94:5 95:13   | 154:12 159:16,16   | title 21:15 86:12     |\n| 186:10 188:12        | 103:9 106:20,24    | 159:18 166:2       | 101:8 114:25          |\n| 70:24<br>th          | 106:25 109:16,18   | 177:2 183:24,25    | today   7:25 8:13     |\n| thank 7:13 12:9      | 110:2,10,23 113:3  | threatened 143:16  | 9:13 10:10 11:5       |\n| 14:14 19:20 29:23    | 115:23 118:12      | 19:272:7<br>three  | 15:4 159:5            |\n| 35:2 38:7,25 41:5    | 119:17 123.9       | 75:16 109:23       | today's<br>13:21      |\n| 41:13 45:24 56:25    | 124:21 125:17      | 112:16 161:25      | 185:6                 |\n| 90:19 94:24 96:14    | 126:11,13,15       | 163:10             | told 63:6 102:10      |\n| 99:25 102:21         | 128:3,5 137:24     | 137:17<br>tie      | 104:17 143:17         |\n| 103:2,3 113:13       | 139:3 140:6,15     | till<br>17:9 153:4 | 147:3 153:19          |\n| 119:2,4 128:19       | 141:19,25 144:7    | 15:18 28:13<br>tim | 181:2 182:14          |\n| 133:4 144:12         | 146:6,18,25 151:2  | 41:13 49:19        | 184:21                |\n| 159:6 161:8          | 152:4 153:8,14     | time 1:11,174:16   | tonight 85:13         |\n| thanks<br>41:16      | 154:18,24 155:5    | 11:14,18 15:9      | top 14:13 18:2        |\n|                      |                    |                    |                       |\n| 144:18<br>theme      | 159:7,10 161:12    | 16:18,19 17:13     | 33:4 41:18 48:23      |\n| 55:21<br>thereto     | 163:2 167:7        | 19:8 21:12,23      | 97:5,8 130:10         |\n| 112:6                | 168:20 170:6,18    | 24:22 40:18 43:16  | 151:13 155:4          |\n\nPAX-014-079\n\n| [topic - | use] |\n|----------|------|\n\n| topic<br>12:2          | 70:11 72:6,12,22       | 134:6 141: 13,23                  | 47:7 63:22 65:21     |\n|------------------------|------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------|\n| topics<br>11:22 12:15  | 73:13 162:8,12         | 155: 14 159:25                    | 76:21 90: 13 92:9    |\n| 12:22                  | 176: 18                | 161: 19, 19 179: 18               | 92:13 107:18         |\n| total<br>94:22 95: 12  | truth<br>186:5         | 181:19 183:25                     | 108: 19 113 :21      |\n| 96:5 132: 10 133 :5    | truthful<br>8:5 10:6   | 184:2                             | 115:20 119:9         |\n| 133:6,23,24 136:9      | truthfully<br>10:2,9   | type<br>17: 15,20                 | 121:3 141: 15        |\n| totally<br>29:9,15     | try<br>8:20 15:22      | 68:14 122:14                      | 147:4 149: 10, 11    |\n| 42:18                  | 61:25 149:8 161:5      | 148:8,17                          | 149: 13,19 180:25    |\n| tower<br>3:25          | 171:5                  | types<br>22:5 51 :22              | 182: 17 183 :2       |\n| track<br>124:17        | trying<br>14:1121:9    | 53: 15 77: 15,18                  | understood<br>9:3    |\n| trade<br>120: 14       | 45:9 48: 14 132: 15    | typically<br>43 :20               | 88:6 89:17 100:16    |\n| trademarks<br>120:4    | 135:23,25 136:5        | 69: 13 86: 15 131:9               | 133:4 145:8          |\n| 120:14                 | 162:14 163:10          | 154:9 166:5<br>c----------------j | undisclosed<br>139:9 |\n| transaction<br>126:9   | 170: 14 174:2          | u                                 | 139: 11,12           |\n| transactional          | turbotax<br>60:23      | 72:6,12 73:13                     | unheard<br>176:24    |\n| 80:12                  | turn<br>3:9 11:8,21    | U.S.<br>161: 10 162: 12           | unit<br>3:16         |\n| transactions<br>80:9   | 33:2 68:5 96:24        | uh<br>8:25                        | united<br>1:2 3:19   |\n| 82:9,25 84: 13         | 105: 18 137:23         | ultimately<br>150:22              | 54:23 62:5 69: 11    |\n| 171:17                 | turning<br>20:24 23 :5 | un<br>42:7,8,9                    | 69:19 71:20 72:2     |\n| transcript<br>8: 14    | 29:24 34:3 35:23       | unclear<br>47:2                   | 72:22 157:7 162:8    |\n| 186:9,9                | 37:18 41:5 43:6        | uncover<br>40:22                  | universe<br>154:6    |\n| transfer<br>82: 10     | 48:22 49:9 50:4        | uncovered<br>40:23                | unkept<br>42:9       |\n| 152:22 171:18          | 55:12 61:7 73:15       | underperforming                   | unknown<br>130: 10   |\n| transfers<br>82:20     | 80:16 82:7 85:17       | 19:5                              | 140:24 157: 17       |\n| translated<br>57:8,14  | 86:5 88:19,19          | understand<br>7:24                | unpaid<br>156: 13    |\n| 57: 16,19              | 91:4 92: 18 95: 11     | 8:3,15,21 9:2,4,7                 | unregistered         |\n| travel<br>123 :2,21    | 103 :7 106: 11         | 9: 15,20,22 11 :25                | 120:6,17             |\n| 143:3                  | 109:3 113:13           | 12:13,18 25:19                    | unrelated<br>14:22   |\n| travels<br>115:24      | 115:12 120:3           | 27:11 34:11,13,16                 | unsecured<br>167:23  |\n| treated<br>77:21       | 124:25 126:5           | 34: 17 40: 16 58:7                | updated<br>137: 17   |\n| tried<br>59: 13 134:25 | 130:8 132:6            | 81:17 86:21                       | upkeep<br>107:9      |\n| 136: 11                | 140: 11 148:3          | 112: 19 115:7                     | uploaded<br>109: 17  |\n| trucks<br>97: 14       | 149:14 151:13          | 129: 14 147: 18                   | 109:20               |\n| true<br>157:2 172: 15  | 159:7                  | 148: 11 150:5                     | ups<br>164: 18       |\n| 186:9 188: 11          | turns<br>144:24        | 153:5 158:11                      | use<br>53: 11 64:24  |\n| trustee<br>54:23       | twitter<br>120:20      | 166: 14 169:2                     | 113: 18,22 115: 15   |\n| 69: 11 71:20 72:2      | two<br>14:24 15: 11    | 170:17 175:10                     | 116:6,10 117:3,7     |\n| 157:7 163:17           | 15: 12 50: 16 62:20    | 177:20                            | 117:22,24 119:7      |\n| 176:21,22              | 77: 15 82:23 87: 18    | understanding                     | 122: 19 139: 17      |\n| trustees<br>20: 16     | 90:7 92:8 129:5        | 11:4 27: 18 28: 11                | 158:24 162:4         |\n| 62:6 68:24 69: 19      | 132: 18 133: 10        | 32:23 37: 15 38:8                 | 169:5                |\n|                        |                        |                                   |                      |\n\n| 60:17 115:21<br>uses       | 55:15 56:19,23        | 165:7,11 184:25      | 104:19,21 117:25    |\n|----------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|---------------------|\n| usually 69:15,16           | 57:2 58:15,21         | 185:4                | 134:15 141:17       |\n| 81:12 83:25 86:25          | 59:15,25 61:14,18     | videos<br>120:8, 19  | 156:23 162:2        |\n| 87:11,18 117:17            | 64:11 65:9,13         | view<br>36:25 107:2  | 188:16              |\n| 134:15 154:11              | 66:10 67:9,12,15      | 148:18 149:6         | 77:22<br>ways       |\n| utilities<br>144:12        | 67:24 71:12,18        | 166:10,19,23         | 16:3 20:16<br>we ve |\n|                            | 72:17 73:18 76:10     | 170:10               | 20:20 21:4,10,10    |\n| V                          | 76:25 78:16 80:20     | virtually 74:19      | 22:13 30:10,15      |\n| v&l<br>56:3                | 82:3 83:4 84:17       | 169:8 176:18.20      | 44:20 45:10 55:14   |\n| v&l's<br>88:12             | 84:22 85:25 87:19     | visit 118:16 142:5   | 67:14 85:8 94:5     |\n| valuable<br>116:3          | 87:23 89:18 93:3      | visits<br>118.9      | 128:12 129:20       |\n| valuation<br>121:10        |                       | volunteered<br>184:8 | 132:3 134:10        |\n| 121:13                     | 94:6,10 95:3          |                      |                     |\n| value 67:15                | 96:20 97:10,15        | W                    | 154:18,21 158:16    |\n| 102:24 120:22              | 98:5 99:5 100:8       | wait<br>8:19         | 162:16 163:20       |\n| 121:7,19,22,25             | 101:13 102:3          | 55:16 94:13<br>wakk  | 164:3               |\n| 122:3,5                    | 106:2 107:23          | walked<br>110:16     | wealthy<br>19:13    |\n| vans 97:14                 | 109:5.11 111:20       | walking<br>98:4      | website<br>162:8    |\n| various<br>18:2 20:3       | 112:8,16,17,20        | 141:7                | wednesday 16:17     |\n| 42:2,5,6 51:16             | 122:15 124:9          | wan 1:5 2:9 3:18     | 45:17 116:2,16      |\n| 54:22 57:9 58:24           | 125:22 128:10         | 5:5 11:6 94:4        | 123:16,18 126:12    |\n| 59:6 69:22 75:11           | 134:21 135:15,19      | 111:18               | 174:15 182:23       |\n| 118:24 120:8,13            | 136:22 140:23         | 16:25 40:21<br>want  | week<br>42:13       |\n| 120:19 183:13              | 144:21 149:11         | 40:22 44:17 45:18    | 66:24<br>weekly     |\n| vehicle 115:23,24          | 163:17                | 55:16 66:23 75:21    | welcome 41:14       |\n| 117:13,22,23               | verdolino's 130:14    | 94:13 104:2          | went 17:5.8 31:5    |\n| vehicles 115:14,21         | 59:16 138:3<br>verify | 105:18 107:5,12      | 43:24 45:19         |\n|                            | veritext 4:3,5        | 146:3 147:19         | 122:23,24,25        |\n| 116:9,13 117:2,8<br>118:25 | 176:17<br>vermont     | 149:8 168:18         | 123:5 174:7         |\n| 1:15 7:9<br>verdolino      | version<br>79:16      |                      | 17:4<br>western     |\n|                            | 127:13 133:15         | 172:3                | whatsoever          |\n| 10:25 12:14,22             | 137:17,24 140:12      | wanted 45:21         | 123:22              |\n| 13:24 15:16 17:12          | 140:20,22 150:10      | 105:10 110:14        | whereof 188:18      |\n| 18:22,25 19:25             | versus 38:9 41:24     | 144:7 163:22         | whispering 3:7      |\n| 20:10,15 21:15,20          | 119:24                | wants 69:20 172:2    | 138.25<br>wife      |\n| 22:24 23:6,18,25           | video 1:14 3:13,17    | 172.3                | 141:13 142:8,24     |\n| 24:17 25:7 26:3            | videographer 2:22     | washington 6:8       | 145:14              |\n| 30:11.13 31:15             | 3:2 4:4 5:9.18        | 34:24<br>water       | willing 64:20       |\n| 36:7.18 37:3.23            | 8:10 11:14,18         | watercraft 97:15     | 67:18,20<br>wip     |\n| 38:21 39:4,17              | 34:23 35:4 90:20      | 119:5                | 152:21<br>wire      |\n| 43:7 44:13 48:8            | 90:24 139:20          | watermark 162:6      | witness 5:11,20,22  |\n| 48:20 49:4,14,18           | 140:3 164:25          | way 47:21 54:19      | 26:21 27:8 28:15    |\n| 49:25 50:15,20             |                       | 62:10 67:3 75:14     |                     |\n\n[witness - zero]\n\n| 29:10,11,1635:3<br>46:21 59:12 78:11     | wrapping<br>91:3<br>96:8      | Z                   |\n|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|---------------------|\n| 83:8 85:10 116:12                        | wraps<br>write<br>36:13 41:18 | 67:14 79:20<br>zero |\n| 130:2 131:4,12                           | 177:10                        | 82:21 94:24         |\n| 148:2 164:20                             | 34:439:6<br>writes            | 106:13,16,24        |\n| 167:9 176:11                             | writings<br>113:9             | 107:19 108:20,23    |\n|                                          | written 8:12 65:18            | 146:4,11            |\n| 185:9 188:9, 12, 18<br>20:21<br>word     | 119:8 121:2                   |                     |\n| words<br>27.9                            | 126:10                        |                     |\n|                                          |                               |                     |\n| 17:8 19:9,11<br>work<br>22:19 40:4 42:10 | wrong 73:5 162:13<br>170:24   |                     |\n|                                          |                               |                     |\n| 43:8 44:13 46:22                         | wrote 37:5 181:25             |                     |\n| 54:5,8,9 56:12,13                        | 182:4                         |                     |\n| 57:17 58:20 59:24                        | X                             |                     |\n| 61:14,18 64:11                           | 1:3,8 187:2,17<br>X           |                     |\n| 66:4,11 67:21<br>68:14 70:14 73:3        | y                             |                     |\n| 73:18 76:24 78:15                        | yacht<br>119:7                |                     |\n| 80:19 83:14,15,17                        | yeah<br>59:13 170:13          |                     |\n| 84:2 86:2 88:10                          | 172:25                        |                     |\n| 88:14,17 89:17                           | year 42:13 74:11              |                     |\n| 90:2,3,13 97:10,16                       | 74:12 75:15,16                |                     |\n| 97:20 98:6 109:10                        | 82:23 154:10,13               |                     |\n| 112:14,20 121:11                         | years 7:17 17:13              |                     |\n| 125:23 135:19                            | 18:3 20:21 82:23              |                     |\n| 154:19,25 167:24                         | 82:24 166:3,4                 |                     |\n| 169:22 176:20                            | 169:3 176:7                   |                     |\n| 177:2 178:2,5                            | 36:2 95:22<br>yep             |                     |\n| worked<br>15:20 45:2                     | 121:9 178:8,10                |                     |\n| 56:16 92:5 95:5                          | yesterday 106:22              |                     |\n| 100:17 109:22                            | 123:16 126:12                 |                     |\n| 135:22 136:4,9                           | york 1:18,19,21               |                     |\n| working 51:18                            | 2:5,5,10,10 3:25              |                     |\n| 90:6 96:22 136:15                        | 4:2 5:23 58:8                 |                     |\n| 155:25 178:4                             | 79:15,17 115:8,10             |                     |\n| works 134:15                             | 146:22 173:19                 |                     |\n| 176:9                                    | 176:14 188:3,7                |                     |\n| world 38:2                               | 120:20<br>youtube             |                     |\n| worried 182:10                           |                               |                     |\n| worth 19:10,25                           |                               |                     |\n|                                          |                               |                     |\n|                                          |                               |                     |\n\nFederal Rules of Civil Procedure\n\nRule 30\n\n(e) Review By the Witness; Changes.\n\n(1) Review; Statement of Changes. On request by the deponent or a party before the deposition is completed, the deponent must be allowed 30 days after being notified by the officer that the transcript or recording is available in which: (A) to review the transcript or recording; and (B) if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement listing the changes and the reasons for making them.\n\n(2) Changes Indicated in the Officer's Certificate. The officer must note in the certificate prescribed by Rule 30 (f) (1) whether a review was requested and, if so, must attach any changes the deponent makes during the 30-day period.\n\nDISCLAIMER: THE FOREGOING FEDERAL PROCEDURE RULES ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THE ABOVE RULES ARE CURRENT AS OF APRIL 1, 2019. PLEASE REFER TO THE APPLICABLE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION.\n\nVERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS COMPANY CERTIFICATE AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions represents that the foregoing transcript is a true, correct and complete transcript of the colloquies, questions and answers as submitted by the court reporter. Veritext Legal Solutions further represents that the attached exhibits, if any, are true, correct and complete documents as submitted by the court reporter and/or attorneys in relation to this deposition and that the documents were processed in accordance with our litigation support and production standards.\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of client and witness information, in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), as amended with respect to protected health information and the Grarnrn-Leach-Bliley Act, as amended, with respect to Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Physical transcripts and exhibits are managed under strict facility and personnel access controls. Electronic files of documents are stored in encrypted form and are transmitted in an encrypted fashion to authenticated parties who are permitted to access the material. Our data is hosted in a Tier 4 SSAE 16 certified facility.\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions complies with all federal and State regulations with respect to the provision of court reporting services, and maintains its neutrality and independence regardless of relationship or the financial outcome of any litigation. Veritext requires adherence to the foregoing professional and ethical standards from all of its subcontractors in their independent contractor agreements.\n\nInquiries about Veritext Legal Solutions' confidentiality and security policies and practices should be directed to Veritext's Client Services Associates indicated on the cover of this document or at www.veritext.com.","body_zh":"证物 PAX 14\n\nCraig Jalbert（克雷格·贾尔伯特）于 April 8, 2022 的宣誓证词笔录\n案件 22-50073 文件 250-14 于 04/22/22 提交 于 04/22/22 16:59:37 登记 第 2 页，共 85 页\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 美国破产法院 康涅狄格地区 布里奇波特分院 ------------------------------------------x 关于：第 11 章 HO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），案件编号 22-50073(JAM) 债务人。 ------------------------------------------x 日期：April 8, 2022 时间：10:17 A.M. Craig Jalbert（克雷格·贾尔伯特）的录像宣誓证词，Verdolino & Lowey, P.C.（韦尔多利诺及洛伊律师事务所）律师，在上述案件中，于上述日期和时间，在 O'Melveny & Myers LLP（奥梅尔维尼及迈尔斯律师事务所）位于 7 Times Square, New York, New York 10036 的办公室举行，由纽约州公证人兼速记记录员 Lenaya Lynch（莱纳娅·林奇）记录。第 1 页\n\n出庭人员：\n\nO'MELVENY & MYERS LLP（奥梅尔维尼及迈尔斯律师事务所）\nPACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND LLP（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限责任合伙企业）的律师\n7 Times Square, 30th Floor\nNew York, New York 10036\n代理律师：\nLAURA ARONSSON, ESQ.（劳拉·阿伦松律师）\nDAVID HARBACH, ESQ.（大卫·哈巴赫律师）\nMaKENZIE B RUSSO, ESQ.（麦肯齐·B·鲁索律师）\n\nBROWN RUDNICK LLP（布朗·鲁德尼克律师事务所）\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）的律师\n7 Times Square\nNew York, New York 10036\n代理律师：\nKENNETH J AULET, ESQ.（肯尼斯·J·奥莱特律师）\n\nPULLMAN & COMLEY LLC（普尔曼及康利律师事务所）\n债权人委员会的律师\n850 Main Street\nPO Box 7006\nBridgeport, Connecticut 06601\n代理律师：\nIRVE J GOLDMAN, ESQ.（欧文·J·戈德曼律师）\n\nCOHN, BIRNBAUM, SHEA P C（科恩、伯恩鲍姆及谢伊律师事务所）\nGOLDEN SPRING（黄金泉）的律师\n100 Pearl Street, Suite 12\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06103\n代理律师：\nTIMOTHY MILTENBERGER, ESQ.（蒂莫西·米尔滕伯格律师），通过电话会议\n\n在场人员：\n\nJON DIFILIPPO（乔恩·迪菲利波），法律录像师\n\n*\n*\n*\n第 2 页　第 4 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n录像师：早上好。现于 April 22nd——抱歉，April 8th, 2022 上午 10:17 开始记录。请注意，麦克风较为灵敏，可能会收录耳语、私人谈话和手机干扰。请关闭所有手机，或将其置于远离麦克风的位置，因为其可能干扰宣誓证词的音频。除非各方均同意停止记录，否则音频和视频录制将继续进行。\n\n这是 Craig Jalbert（克雷格·贾尔伯特）在关于 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的案件中的录像宣誓证词的媒体单元 1，该案已向美国破产法院康涅狄格地区布里奇波特分院提交，案件编号为 22-50073。\n\n本次宣誓证词在 O'Melveny and Myers LLP（奥梅尔维尼及迈尔斯律师事务所）举行，地址为纽约州纽约市时代广场大厦。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n我的名字是 Jonathan Difilippo（乔纳森·迪菲利波），我来自 Veritext（维瑞文本）公司，担任录像师。法庭记录员是来自 Veritext 公司的 Lenaya Lynch（莱纳娅·林奇）。\n\n我无权主持宣誓。我与本诉讼中的任何一方均无亲属关系，也未在结果中具有经济利益。\n\n律师、在场的所有人员以及所有远程参加人员现在将为记录陈述其出庭情况及所属机构。如对本程序有任何异议，请在陈述出庭情况时提出，首先由发出通知的律师陈述。\n\nARONSSON 女士：Laura Aronsson（劳拉·阿伦松），O'Melveny and Myers（奥梅尔维尼及迈尔斯律师事务所），代理 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund LP（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）。\n\nHARBACH 先生：David Harbach（大卫·哈巴赫），O'Melveny and Myers（奥梅尔维尼及迈尔斯律师事务所），代理同一客户。\n\nRUSSO 女士：Makenzie Russo（麦肯齐·鲁索），O'Melveny and Myers（奥梅尔维尼及迈尔斯律师事务所），代理同一客户。\n\nAULET 先生：Kenneth Aulet（肯尼斯·奥莱特），Brown Rudnick（布朗·鲁德尼克律师事务所），债务人 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的拟任律师。\n\nGOLDMAN 先生：Irve Goldman（欧文·戈德曼），Pullman and Comley（普尔曼及康利律师事务所），债权人委员会的拟任律师。\n\n录像师：请法庭记录员为证人主持宣誓。\n\nAULET 先生：线上有一人。\n\nMILTENBERGER 先生：现场人员都结束了吗？Timothy Miltenberger（蒂莫西·米尔滕伯格），代理 Golden Spring, NY Limited（黄金泉纽约有限公司）。\n\n录像师：请法庭记录员为证人主持宣誓。\n\nCRAIG JALBERT（克雷格·贾尔伯特）作为证人被传唤，在经纽约州公证人首先依法宣誓后，接受询问并作证如下：\n\n询问\n由 ARONSSON 女士进行：\n\n问：请为记录陈述您的姓名。\n\n答：Craig Jalbert，J-A-L-B-E-R-T。\n\n问：您的地址是什么？\n\n答：家庭地址？营业地址是 124 Washington Street, Suite 101, Foxboro, Massachusetts 02035。\n\n问：早上好。我们此前已在非记录状态下见过面。在记录状态下，我叫 Laura Aronsson（劳拉·阿伦松），是 O'Melveny and Myers（奥梅尔维尼及迈尔斯律师事务所）代理 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金）的律师。Jalbert 先生，您以前是否曾在法庭上作证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在哪个案件中——或者我先问，多少次？\n\n答：50、60、70 多次。\n\nGOLDMAN 先生：在我们深入之前，我能否问一下——这份宣誓证词通知涉及哪一项争议事项？法院目前有多项动议。这份宣誓证词通知并未说明其涉及哪一项事项。\n\nARONSSON 女士：当然。我们已送达一份 30(b)(6) 宣誓证词通知，我将其标记为证物，以便我们都能了解同一内容，但其涉及对 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺及洛伊律师事务所）的聘用。\n\nGOLDMAN 先生：好的。我只是不确定，因为通知中没有标明。\n\nARONSSON 女士：谢谢。\n\n问：抱歉。您说是 50 或 60 次？\n\n答：70、80 次，我不知道。我没有保留记录——我有一份可追溯十年的清单，其中记录了 40 或 50 次，而我已经从事这项工作 30 年。所以不清楚。\n\n问：好的，我们之后可以谈谈您所具有的一些广泛类别的经验，但我们先来复核几项我相信您熟悉的程序。您是否理解，您今天是在宣誓后作证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否理解，这意味着您宣誓保证您的所有回答均为真实？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：并且您受伪证罪处罚的约束？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：录像师正用摄像机记录所有内容，法庭记录员正在制作我们今天在此讨论内容的书面记录，并将在之后出具该笔录的副本。您理解吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：与正常交谈不同，重要的是我们不要彼此同时说话。请在我完成提问后再回答。我也会尽量对您这样做。您理解吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您的回答需要清晰可闻。摇头以及诸如“嗯哼”之类的表述均不足够。您理解吗？\n\n答：理解。\n\n问：如果您不理解我的问题，请要求我重复。否则，我将假定您理解该问题。可以吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：如您需要休息，请告知我，我们可以休息；但如有待答问题，请在休息前回答。您今天由律师代理吗？\n\n答：我想是的。\n\n问：您理解是谁在代理您？\n\n答：Ken Aulet（肯·奥莱特）。\n\n问：如果您的律师对问题提出异议，除非您不理解该问题或律师指示您不要回答，否则您仍应回答。您理解吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否患有任何会损害您准确或如实作证能力的疾病？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否正在服用任何可能干扰您准确或如实作证能力的药物？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否有任何原因使您今天无法如实和准确地作证？\n\n答：没有。\n\nARONSSON 女士：标签一。法庭记录员将标记后来称为 Jalbert 证物 1 的文件。\n\n（兹将《宣誓证词通知》由记录员于本日标记为供识别之用的 Jalbert 证物 1。）\n\n问：好的，Jalbert 先生。您认得这份文件吗？\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：它是什么？\n\n答：Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund LLP（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限责任合伙企业）根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》第 30(b)(6) 条向 Verdolino and Lowey PC（韦尔多利诺及洛伊专业公司）发出的宣誓证词通知。\n\n问：您是否理解，您今天是在与关于 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的案件有关的情况下作证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能否翻到第 6 页——\n\n答：抱歉，我忘了拿眼镜。\n\nARONSSON 女士：我们能否停止记录一分钟？\n\n录像师：现在是上午 10:24，我们停止记录。\n\n（随后进行了非记录讨论。）\n\n录像师：现在是上午 10:24，我们恢复记录。您可以继续。\n\n问：您能否翻到第 6 页，标题为“规则 30(b)(6) 宣誓证词主题”的部分？您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否理解，您已被指定就此处列出的每一主题作证？\n\nAULET 先生：异议。\n\n答：是。\n\nAULET 先生：他已按照我们的答复和异议被指定。\n\nARONSSON 女士：谢谢。\n\n问：您熟悉这些主题领域吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否理解，您必须就 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺及洛伊律师事务所）对这些主题的了解作证，而不仅仅是您个人的了解？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否理解，您必须取得使您能够代表 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺及洛伊律师事务所）就上述每一主题作出完整且诚实证言所需的全部知识和信息？\n\nAULET 先生：与之前相同的异议。\n\n答：我已尽力而为。\n\n问：您为准备本次宣誓证词做了什么，如有的话？\n\n答：我与律师 Ben Silverberg（本·西尔弗伯格）、律师 Ken Aulet（肯·奥莱特）交谈过；我与同事 Matthew Flynn（马修·弗林）和 Mary Jo Schindler（玛丽·乔·辛德勒）交谈过。我审阅了大量文件，一些已向法院提交，一些为内部准备。我审阅了电子邮件。尽可能涵盖了所有内容。\n\n问：您收集了您准备的文件，还是这些文件由律师提供给您？\n\n答：那些文件——您是在问我们发送给 O'Melveny（奥梅尔维尼律师事务所）的文件吗？\n\n问：我是在问——退一步说，只是询问您为今天的宣誓证词所作的准备。\n\n答：我只查看了 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺及洛伊律师事务所）服务器上我自己的文件和我自己的电子邮件。\n\n问：一般而言，那些电子邮件的主题是什么？\n\n答：是查看——并非全部。我的许多电子邮件，关于财务状况说明书——SOFA——附表、总体附注、总体附注和具体附注、大多数聘用专业人员的诉状，特别是我们的诉状、债务人持有融资动议、许多异议，但不是全部。我正在想是否还有别的。除了这些以外，我一时想不起来其他内容——\n\n问：谢谢。这很有帮助。那么，您提到您与您的律师 Ben 和 Ken 谈过？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您何时与他们谈过？\n\n答：嗯，我们稍有延迟，所以我今天早上与 Ken 谈了几分钟。我昨晚与 Ben 简短谈过。再次，今天早上谈的是——与宣誓证词无关的事；而在过去几天中，我此前可能与 Ken 谈过一两次，大致如此。\n\n问：除了我们谈过的人以外，还有其他人吗？\n\n答：关于——只是关于宣誓证词？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您没有与债务人谈过？\n\n答：关于宣誓证词？\n\n问：关于宣誓证词。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否曾见过债务人？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您何时见到债务人？\n\n答：持续进行的 342——或 341 会议，我认为是在星期三，那是我第一次见到他。\n\n问：那是您唯一一次见到债务人吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：除 341 程序以外，您是否与债务人有过互动？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我只想稍微涵盖一下\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n问：这些互动是否均通过电话进行？\n\n问：谈谈你的背景。你能谈谈自高中以来的教育经历吗？\n\n答：截至今日，是的。\n\n答：我于1979年毕业于Western Connecticut High School（西康涅狄格高中）。我就读于Boston College（波士顿学院），于1983年获得会计学理学学士学位毕业。1983年6月至1987年8月31日，我在Arthur Andersen（安达信）工作。1987年9月1日，我开始在现称Verdolino and Lowey（Verdolino and Lowey）之前身的机构工作，此后35年来一直在那里；在此期间，我参加过许许多多各种类型的CPE课程。\n\n问：就为本次证言记录所作准备而言，你与律师一同准备大约花了多长时间？\n\n问：你所称的CPE是什么意思？\n\n答：我只能估计一下。我手头没有我的时间记录。\n\n答：继续专业教育。\n\n问：比如两小时、十小时？\n\n问：这是你所持有的任何类型认证的必经程序吗？\n\n答：我估计在两至四小时之间，不会超过这个时间。\n\n答：其中一部分是我作为认证破产重组顾问所持认证的要求。其余只是为了维持我的专业能力，并随着岁月推移掌握各类问题的最新情况。\n\n问：除Verdolino and Lowey的人员和你的律师外，就本次证言记录，你是否与其他任何人交谈过？\n\n答：我们的信息技术人员Tim McDonald（蒂姆·麦克唐纳）协助进行检索——对电子邮件和记录进行电子检索，并与Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）的信息技术人员合作，将所有材料发送过去。除请他设法取得记录外，我们没有讨论本案事实、情形或其他任何事项。\n\n5（第14—17页）\n\nPAX-014-005\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：我想有三个或四个——我想是四个主要类别。第一个也是最大的类别是破产领域，即经营不佳的企业和个人。这包括诉讼支持及与之相关的一切。我们有一个全职税务团队，我想有13或14人；我们还提供我称之为高净值人士事务管理的服务。我们有——我不做这类工作。我的合伙人和其他人做，但我们有非常富有的客户，他们不自行支付账单，且拥有多处住所。所有事项都交给我们。我们为相当多的人担任家族办公室。我们最后从事的一项业务是为联邦国会议员、参议员和总统选举进行联邦选举申报。\n\n问：那么，你提到了认证破产讲师？\n\n答：认证破产重组顾问。CIRA。\n\n问：因此，这是一项专业认证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：除CIA外，你还持有任何其他专业认证吗？\n\n答：CIRA，没有。\n\n问：CIRA。我想你说过，你拥有Boston College的会计学学位？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你是否持有任何其他研究生学位，或者任何研究生学位？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：你目前受雇于Verdolino and Lowey吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：一般而言，Verdolino and Lowey向其客户提供何种服务？\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：谢谢。\n\n答：我有没有说我们有税务部门——是的，税务部门。这就是四类。\n\n问：你提到了高净值人士事务管理。在Verdolino，谁负责此项业务？\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：嗯，我的合伙人和各类工作人员。\n\n问：他的名字是什么？\n\n答：Keith Lowey（基思·洛伊）。\n\n问：该部门是否参与了我们面前的这项事项？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在破产情形中，Verdolino and Lowey是否总是由债务人聘请？\n\n答：不是。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey还会在哪些其他情形下受聘？\n\n答：我们曾受托于受托人、确认后受托责任人——无论他们被如何称呼；你提到了债务人、债权人委员会、债权人、担保贷款人。我认为，多年来，我们大概已代表过破产案件中几乎所有类型的当事人和利害关系人。\n\n问：具体谈谈你的经验，你在第11章案件中有哪些经验？\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：我参与过500多起第11章案件。我们曾担任委员会财务顾问、委员会会计师、债务人财务顾问、债务人会计师、代表担保贷款人的会计师、代表个人债权人的会计师。我想想——我的意思是，再次说明，我们几乎代表过每一种利益相关方，因此随着时间推移，我曾代表过我记得的破产案件中每一种合理的利益相关方。\n\n问：你在Verdolino and Lowey的职务是什么？\n\n答：负责人。\n\n问：我们谈到了四个类别。一般而言，就Verdolino and Lowey提供的服务而言，你的职责是什么？\n\n答：基本上，我所有未用于管理自己事务所的时间，都投入于破产、无力偿债及类似事务，也少量涉及税务。我不管理该部门或类似事务，但我当然会参与互动；还包括诉讼支持及类似工作，即你在破产情形下会做的各类事项。\n\n6（第18—21页）\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：一般而言，诉讼支持是什么意思？\n\n答：嗯，范围可以相当广，但就我们而言，无论是商业诉讼还是破产诉讼，在律师事务所——我们也曾被法官指定——所涉领域中，任何希望或有兴趣以其所需形式取得财务信息的人，我们都会提供该等信息。该等工作包括编制专家报告、提供专家证言，以及在律师处理会计、审计及类似领域时向其提供建议。\n\n问：你提到你是Verdolino and Lowey的负责人？\n\n答：是。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：你还担任过哪些其他职务？\n\n答：自我开始工作以来，我一直是负责人。\n\n问：转向本次委托，是谁就该项委托联系了Verdolino and Lowey？\n\n答：是有人直接联系了我，此人是Brown Rudnick的律师Steven Pohl（史蒂文·波尔）。\n\n问：抱歉，我没听清你说的内容。\n\nHARBACH先生：请拼写该姓名。\n\n问：请你拼写该姓名好吗？\n\n答：该姓名是Steven Pohl。姓氏拼写为P-O-H-L，来自Brown Rudnick。\n\n问：Pohl先生联系了Verdolino and Lowey的谁？\n\n答：我。\n\n问：你。你记得那是什么时候吗？\n\n答：大约在3月1日、2日或3日。\n\n问：Steven Pohl联系后，就该项委托，Verdolino and Lowey一般与谁交谈？\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：与Steven Pohl有过一些沟通，并且——我相信是Ben Silverberg（本·西尔弗伯格）。\n\n问：Brown Rudnick还有其他人吗？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：除Brown Rudnick外，就潜在委托一事，你是否与其他任何人交谈过？\n\n答：我可能向我自己的工作人员提过一些情况，以便进行利益冲突审查；我想我让某人协助我准备了一些——我不该说准备，它们已经准备好了——发送一些有关我本人和事务所的个人资料。\n\n问：就该项委托，除Brown Rudnick外，Verdolino and Lowey是否与其他任何人交谈过？\n\nAULET先生：异议。你可以回答。\n\n答：是在我们受聘时吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在——谁是主要联系人——谁是——删去。除Verdolino and Lowey内部人员外，就该项委托，你通常与谁交谈？\n\n答：主要是Brown Rudnick的律师。\n\n问：你还与其他任何人交谈吗？\n\n答：我曾与其他律师参加电话会议，但我没有主动发起任何事项。\n\n问：你曾与哪些其他律师参加电话会议？\n\n答：据我所知，其他债务人律师是Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）和Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）。\n\n问：你认为Aaron Mitchell是什么身份？\n\n答：债务人Kwok先生的律师。\n\n问：你提到了Melissa Francis？\n\n答：同样是Kwok先生的律师。\n\n问：除Aaron Mitchell和Melissa Francis外，就该项委托，你是否与Verdolino and Lowey之外的其他任何人交谈？\n\n7（第22—25页）\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：以及Brown Rudnick之外的人？\n\n问：是，Brown Rudnick之外。\n\n答：没有其他人。\n\n问：那么——那么，就该项委托，除Aaron Mitchell、Melissa Francis和Brown Rudnick外，你是否通过电子邮件与其他任何人沟通？\n\n答：我曾被抄送于一封电子邮件，并向该群体之外的某人发送过一封电子邮件。\n\n问：那个人是谁？\n\nAULET先生：异议。此人即我们已说明应根据Golden Springs（戈登斯普林斯）的请求不披露其身份的人。\n\nARONSSON女士：你是否指示证人不要回答？\n\nAULET先生：我指示他不要回答。\n\nARONSSON女士：你能否仅仅说明——\n\nGOLDMAN先生：你能否重复一下问题？\n\n（随后，书记员重读了所述问题。）\n\n证人：应当是“电子邮件”。我写过一封，但我被抄送于多封电子邮件。\n\n问：我理解Aule[t]先生正指示你不要回答。\n\nARONSSON女士：Aulet先生，你是否介意提供更详细的异议理由？\n\nAULET先生：当然。根据我与Golden Spring的谈话，我的理解是，Golden Spring认为披露该个人的姓名可能会使其遭受骚扰；并且根据我对争议文件的审阅，该人的身份与本次证言记录所涉问题无关。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：因此，我将在记录中说明，我们对该主张提出异议。\n\nGOLDMAN先生：我们也是。你们——你们担心遭到谁的骚扰？你们担心遭到谁的骚扰？\n\nAULET先生：那么，Golden Spring的律师在线上，该问题最好向Golden Springs提出；但我的理解是——请，他希望回答。\n\nMILTENBERGER先生：我是Golden Springs的Tim Miltenberger（蒂姆·米尔滕伯格）。我假设证人正在作证的是Golden Spring一名雇员的身份；从记录中我并不清楚这一点，但显然证言记录现场的人得出了该结论。基于已对债务人占有融资动议提出的异议，我们认为披露Golden Spring雇员的姓名并无相关性；我们认为，我们雇员的隐私权优先于可能因知悉Golden Spring普通雇员姓名而获得的任何信息，并且我们反对披露该信息。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\nGOLDMAN先生：这应由法官决定。指示证人不要回答是完全不适当的。证人可以回答，你们可以请求法官裁定该回答是否应被删除、受到保护，或受保护令约束。指示证人不要回答是完全不适当的。\n\nARONSSON女士：我已记录我们与Aulet先生之间的争议；我还要记录我们对Miltenberger先生就此提出异议的理由存有争议。\n\n85\n\n第T页\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n8（第26—29页）\n\nMILTENBERGER先生：谢谢。\n\n问：回到我们刚才谈到的那些人，你提到——\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n问：Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）。她是否向您表示，她是Kwok（郭文贵）先生的律师？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是如何得知Melissa Francis女士——她是谁的——撤回这个问题。您是如何得知Francis女士的委托人是谁的？\n\n答：从Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）得知。\n\n问：我们已经谈过您就本次聘任事宜与Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺与洛伊）方面沟通的人员。除我们已经谈到的人员外，您是否知道Verdolino and Lowey还与其他任何人就本次聘任事宜进行沟通？\n\n答：我认为没有其他人，但我的一位同事有可能见过Flynn（弗林）。可能有过电子邮件联系。您知道——因为我认为您曾提出异议——有大量日常业务中的专业人员。我们需要获取有关对他们负债的信息，以编制清单。可能有一些信息和资料，因为我们需要——这有可能——他与他们交谈过，但我认为实际上他所做的是从Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）和Melissa Francis那里获得所有信息。我不认为他超出了这个范围，但有这种可能。\n\n问：您知道Aaron Mitchell和Melissa Francis从何处获取他们的信息吗？\n\n答：不知道。\n\n问：您是否询问过他们从何处获取信息？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：从Verdolino and Lowey方面，是谁就聘任函进行了谈判——谁进行了谈判？\n\n答：是我。我不知道是否会称其为谈判，但确实是我起草并准备了该函件，并将其发送给Brown Rudnick。\n\n问：还有其他任何人参与起草该聘任函吗？\n\n答：嗯，从QPC（QPC）的角度看，我确信我让我的一位同事Mary Jo Schindler（玛丽·乔·辛德勒）审阅过，以确保我没有遗漏任何事项。\n\n问：除Brown Rudnick的律师外，您是否向其他任何人传阅过该聘任函的草稿？\n\n答：我不记得还有其他任何人在上面，但我相当确定他们随后确实将其传阅给了——至少包括Melissa Francis，可能还包括Aaron Mitchell。\n\nARONSSON女士：Tab 11。法庭记录员将向您出示标记为Jalbert（贾尔伯特）证物2的文件。为记录起见，该文件的Bates编号为Kwok 00001646。\n\n（随后，电子邮件链由记录员于本日标记为Jalbert证物2，以供识别。）\n\n问：在我们查看该证物之前，什么是破产申请后预付聘金？\n\n答：我的理解是，在提交破产申请后向任何人支付的、拟作为预付聘金的聘金。\n\n第30页　第32页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：您能翻到该文件第2页吗？请花一点时间。第2页顶部，Silverberg（西尔弗伯格）先生说，预计不会有破产申请后预付聘金。您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您是否记得，您是否倾向于收取破产申请后预付聘金？\n\n答：嗯，每位专业人士都会更愿意有一笔预付聘金，但坦率地说，在当时情况下，这并不在预期之内。\n\n问：从您的偏好说起，您为什么会倾向于有一笔破产申请后预付聘金？\n\n答：作为费用支付的保障。\n\n问：您知道您是否在本案中收到过破产申请后预付聘金吗？\n\n答：我知道。\n\n问：您收到过吗？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：为什么没有？\n\n答：我没有要求。\n\n问：回到电子邮件，Silverberg先生写道：“重大问题是由我们聘用你们，还是由客户聘用你们。我认为你们是由客户以其财务顾问身份聘用的。”您是否记得这在本次聘任中曾是一个问题？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我认为我不理解您的问题。我可以阅读并理解该陈述，但我不知道您在问什么。\n\n问：他说“重大问题”，您是否理解那是一个重大问题？\n\n答：我理解这可能是他心中的一个问题。我不知道他是否意图将其作为向我提出的问题，或者是他自己提出然后又作答的问题。\n\nARONSSON女士：Makenzie（麦肯齐），你能把Tab 12递给我吗？\n\n摄像员：Jalbert先生，您介意挪一下水瓶吗？它进入画面了。\n\n第34页　第36页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n答：抱歉。谢谢。\n\n证人：对此抱歉。\n\n摄像员：感谢。\n\nARONSSON女士：法庭记录员将把该文件标记为Jalbert证物3。该文件的Bates编号为Kwok 00001649。\n\n（随后，电子邮件链由记录员于本日标记为Jalbert证物3，以供识别。）\n\n问：请查看该文件。\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：您正在回复我们刚才谈到的Silverberg先生的电子邮件，其中的重大问题是由我们聘用你们，还是由客户聘用你们。\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：转到您的回复，您写道：“如有可能，我希望有一笔破产申请后预付聘金。”您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您是否曾就本次聘任要求提供破产申请后预付聘金？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您知道Verdolino and Lowey是否曾就本次聘任要求提供破产申请后预付聘金吗？\n\n答：我知道。\n\n问：答案是什么？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您还写道：“但我认为，如果我们要持有现金，我们将需要受债务人聘用。”那么，这是否唤起您对如下问题的记忆：究竟是谁聘用Verdolino and Lowey是否曾是一个问题？\n\n答：我不认为我心中存在这个问题。我只是作出了一项评论，以支持他此前所作的评论，即他说“我认为你们是由客户以其财务顾问身份聘用的”。\n\n问：一般而言，您能否解释一下您对Silverberg先生提出的关于谁在聘用Verdolino and Lowey这一问题的看法？\n\n答：嗯，我相当确信，当他写道“我认为你们将由客户以其财务顾问身份聘用”时，那是——我作出了一个无偿的评论，或者说不是无偿的评论。我基本上作出了一个赞同的评论，即我认为如果我们要持有现金，我们需要受债务人聘用。因此，是赞同他所作的决定或想法。\n\n问：您刚才所解释的理解依据是什么？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：哪一部分？\n\n问：在您的电子邮件中，“如果我们要持有现金，我们将需要受债务人聘用”。该陈述的依据是什么？\n\n答：嗯，我的专业判断。如果我作为Verdolino and Lowey的负责人，要成为债务人占有财产银行账户的签字人，那么该债务人占有财产当然应当是我的客户。因此，我实际上是在赞同Silverberg先生在这封电子邮件链中前一封电子邮件里作出的判断。\n\n问：谢谢。仅为我自己的理解，受债务人聘用与受Brown Rudnick聘用之间有什么区别？\n\n答：嗯，如果我受Brown Rudnick聘用，我不确定我是否会经历——我不确定我是否必须经历破产程序中的聘用程序。我是否会提交一项动议以获准受聘？我不知道。我不知道该问题的答案。这不是我在此之外曾考虑过的事情。因此——但如果我是对的，并且不存在代表债务人提交动议以聘用Verdolino and Lowey的机会，我不知道我们如何才能允许我成为债务人账户的签字人。\n\n问：谢谢。这很有帮助。您是否就谁将聘用Verdolino and Lowey这一决定依赖Brown Rudnick？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，Silverberg先生在他的电子邮件中写道：“我认为你们是由客户以其财务顾问身份聘用的。”同一天的下一封电子邮件中，当我在下午6:49有时间处理此事时——也就是说，已经过了五个小时——我基本上赞同了他的判断。谁作出了该决定，我不知道。这是措辞问题，但我认为从这一点起，很清楚我们将由债务人而非Brown Rudnick聘用。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey是否曾在破产程序中受一家律师事务所聘用？\n\n答：我们经常在程序中受律师聘用。我认为甚至包括在破产程序中，目的在于维持特权。\n\n问：您所说“目的在于维持特权”是什么意思？\n\n答：嗯，很多时候，在案件中，我们——该事务所被聘请参与，并完成该特定聘任预定的任何工作。经常是诉讼支持。如果预定由我们进行调查，律师会预先考虑，瞧，你们将进行调查，我们认为这是我们将会发现的内容。然后我们将不得不取得一份专家报告，提交给某一法院。之后，我们可能需要你们经历包括记录、证言和类似事项在内的证据开示程序，然后我们可能需要你们作为专家作证。据我理解，在这些特定案件中，在我被宣布为专家之前的某一时点，均存在特权；但在其他情况下，我们被聘为——律师的财务顾问。他们希望我们进行调查。他们希望我们查明任何需要查明的事项，无论指控是什么，无论争议是什么，但他们可能聘用另一家事务所或个人作为专家作证，以维持我们所掌握知识的特权。我不知道这是否与此处有关。\n\n问：谢谢。回到证物2——\n\nMILTENBERGER先生：抱歉打断一下。我被叫去处理另一件事，所以我现在必须离开。记录可以注明我正在离开本次证言录取。\n\nHARBACH先生：谢谢，Tim（蒂姆）。欢迎您随时重新加入。\n\nMILTENBERGER先生：会的，谢谢。\n\n问：我想询问您顶部的电子邮件，您写道：“我的感觉是，在个人案件中，FA”——财务顾问——“的职责与持续经营企业案件明显不同”。您能向我解释个人案件与持续经营企业案件之间的区别吗？\n\n答：因此，持续经营企业案件——\n\n其规模和形式各不相同。它们可能有附属实体、母公司、同级公司。可能有多个债务人。它们可能在不同国家、不同州拥有雇员。根据业务性质，可能存在未申报的工资税、销售税、容器押金，且相关记录未予保存。它们可能需要在预算编制和维持业务运营方面投入更多工作。其是否有足够现金、周预算为何、一年期预算为何。现金担保物方面——你会有一名有担保债权人，其通常——可能不反对债务人，但也未必支持债务人。因此——这完全是另一种情况。在本案中，有些个人经营房地产或类似业务，但他们很少经营一家跨国、跨州、拥有雇员并负有各类申报要求和合规要求的企业。\n\n问：可以说，在涉及持续经营企业的案件中，财务顾问职责比个人案件更复杂吗？\n\n答：在大多数情况下，是的。\n\n问：不看该证物，在本案中，是谁指示维多利诺和洛伊专业公司（Verdolino and Lowey PC）开展工作的范围？\n\n答：我认为没有任何人指示我们。\n\n问：因为是您起草了委聘函？\n\n答：我确信曾与律师进行过讨论。我不具体记得那些讨论，但这并非我第一次起草聘任文件——至少是其中一部分聘任文件。显然，我不是律师。我不知道所有哪些内容会纳入聘任文件，但就职责而言，通常我会对职责内容提出意见。我确信是我们先起草了初稿，而布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所（Brown Rudnick）在审阅时可能作了一些修改。我不记得当时具体是如何进行的。\n\n问：就该项委聘而言，没有人告知您本案需要完成哪些工作吗？\n\n答：嗯，我们参与了大量讨论。这不是我的第一宗破产案，不是我的第50宗破产案，也不是我的第100宗破产案。我对将会出现的问题有相当清楚的认识，并由我先起草初稿。我不记得此后是否作过修改。\n\n问：一般而言，维多利诺和洛伊在本案中的工作范围是什么？\n\n答：在本案中？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：嗯，聘任文件本身已说明一切。因此，如果您想逐行讨论，请把文件放在我面前。\n\n问：当然。\n\n答：截至目前，我们首先集中于——我记得是同时处理财务状况说明书（SOFAs）和附表。我的意思是，它们在同一天、同一时间到期。因此，那是首先处理的事项。其后——紧接着，我相信我们着手处理每个人的委聘文件，以便提交法院；而且可能在该项工作接近尾声时，我相信我的同事马特·弗林（Matt Flynn）开始编制月度经营报告，该报告应于2月底前提交，大约是在3月20日、21日、22日左右。让我想想我们是否还做过其他工作——哦，或者协助准备——在较小程度上参与准备债务人参加341会议。我们通过电话参加了第一天的341会议。我和我的同事马特·弗林参加了第二天的341听证会，也就是上周三举行的那次——我该怎么称呼它——我们没有就我们的时间收费。我是作为观察员前去的。我们知道不会参与，但我们希望在场了解发生了什么、见见相关人员，然后便是本次证言录取。\n\n问：谢谢。因此，我理解财务状况说明书和附表是第一步。您谈到了就本案起草每个人的委聘文件。\n\n答：嗯，是起草我们自己的委聘文件。每个人都在处理各自的文件，而我需要就我的文件获得帮助，因为我不是律师。\n\n问：然后，您谈到了马特·弗林就月度经营报告承担的职责。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：最后，您谈到了为341听证会作准备并参加341听证会？\n\n答：是341会议。\n\n问：您能否进一步说明您就这些341会议所承担的职责？\n\n奥莱特先生（Mr. Aulet）：我只是提醒证人不要披露任何工作成果或与律师的谈话。\n\n答：在341会议的第一天，大家只是认为我们应当参与，因为当时不清楚会出现什么情况，也不知道是否会出现我们需要处理的事项。\n\n问：撇开您与律师的谈话，您是否了解341听证会第一天可能会出现何种需要您参与的事项？\n\n答：在我的职业生涯中，我参加过大量341会议。在341会议上，任何事情都可能发生，因为该会议向每一名债权人开放，天知道会发生什么。\n\n问：您是否预计在341会议期间需要参与或提出问题？\n\n答：我认为有人要求我们保持电话在线。我并未以任何方式参与。\n\n阿龙松女士（Ms. Aronsson）：庭审记录员将向您出示标记为贾尔伯特证物4号（Jalbert Exhibit 4）的文件。\n\n（随后，债务人申请书由记录员于本日标记为贾尔伯特证物4号，以供识别。）\n\n阿龙松女士：为记录起见，这是一份题为《债务人申请授权聘任维多利诺和洛伊专业公司担任财务顾问》的文件。该文件在本案中以案卷条目90（Docket 90）提交。\n\n问：贾尔伯特先生，您可以查看这份文件。\n\n答：您想让我注意什么内容吗？\n\n问：您认得这份文件吗？\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：这是什么文件？\n\n答：债务人申请授权聘任维多利诺和洛伊专业公司担任财务顾问。\n\n问：请翻到该文件第18页，使用页面顶部的页码。这是什么文件？\n\n答：这是克雷格·R·贾尔伯特（Craig R. Jalbert）为支持债务人申请授权聘任维多利诺和洛伊专业公司担任财务顾问而提交的宣誓书。\n\n问：因此，您认得这是您提交的宣誓书——\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：请翻到第21页，表格——我想询问页面底部的表格。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：退一步说，我想您提到过维多利诺和洛伊参与本案的人员——马特·弗林、玛丽·乔·辛德勒（Mary Jo Schindler）和您本人。维多利诺和洛伊还有其他人参与本案吗？\n\n答：我提到过蒂姆·麦克唐纳（Tim MacDonald），我们的信息技术人员。他仅参与了与本次证言录取有关的工作，即检索我们的电子邮件、服务器记录及所有相关资料，并将其传送给布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所，再由该所发送给各位。\n\n问：维多利诺和洛伊还有其他人吗？\n\n答：据我所知，没有。\n\n问：看这张表格，马特·弗林也是负责人吗？\n\n答：不是。\n\n问：马特·弗林的职务是什么？\n\n答：经理。\n\n问：明迪·乔·辛德勒（Mindy Jo Schindler）是负责人吗？\n\n答：不是。\n\n问：她的职务是什么？\n\n答：经理。\n\n问：因此，就维多利诺和洛伊的这项委聘而言，有一名负责人、两名经理以及那名信息技术人员？\n\n答：我相信是的。\n\n问：您预计维多利诺和洛伊的其他雇员会参与本案吗？\n\n答：随着案件进展，假设我们参与本案，是的。\n\n问：一般而言，在像本案这样的破产案件中，负责人的职责是什么？\n\n答：我将其视为合伙人、董事、执行董事，或任何类似职称；即本所负责该案件的主导人员。\n\n问：具体就本案而言，您预计负责人会做什么？\n\n答：我协助编制财务状况说明书和附表、总体说明以及总体说明中的具体部分。我协助处理月度经营报告。我参加了首日听证会——抱歉，不是首日听证会，是341会议的第一天。答复各律师及支持人员就其所从事工作的各种询问。\n\n问：您预计经理会就本案做什么？\n\n答：同样的工作——同样的事情。只是工作量和工作类型可能不同。我更多进行审阅。视具体事项而定，他们可能支持我，我也可能支持他们。与其他任何委聘没有什么不同。你不知道日常会发生什么，每个人都会尽其所能、尽可能高效地应对持续存在的问题和出现的危机。\n\n问：那么工作人员呢？您预计工作人员在本案中可能承担何种职责？\n\n答：这取决于案件如何发展。我认为不会发生，但如果发生，而且我们成为——我成为债务人占有银行账户的唯一签字人，我的事务所可能会——簿记员可能会保管付款和收款记录。他们会协助进行申报。我当然可能会审阅。如果在某个时间点，我们有债权异议，我不知道那些异议的性质会是什么，也不知道规模有多大、多复杂，但我们的一些工作人员可能会参与债权事项。债务人可能必须提交所得税申报表。我将建议他们为破产财产提交所得税申报表。因此，我们会让税务人员参与编制所得税申报表，而我必须逐项考虑——并且能够准确预测将会发生什么，但我们非常高效，也非常熟悉相关工作。我们知道我们的所有费用均须接受每一名利益相关方的审查。因此，我们——在每项事务上均尽可能采用合理的低级别人员；除此以外会出现什么情况，我无法预测，但工作人员和簿记员会被用于处理这类事项。\n\n问：可以说，您对我关于工作人员问题的回答，也适用于簿记员和簿记员的职责吗？\n\n答：不，簿记员和工作人员。\n\n问：那么，您刚才给出的回答适用于这两者？\n\n答：您问的是他们可能会做什么。\n\n问：对。\n\n答：他们——簿记员\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n他们不会进行报告工作，但会保管收款和支出记录。工作人员可能会负责财务报表或将要出具的任何报告的格式。工作人员将处理对债权申报的异议。税务专业人员将负责报税表。\n\n问：您是否已完成您的回答？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您提到收款和支出。您预计本案中会有哪些种类的收款和支出？\n\n答：我设想，如果事情按照债务人计划的方式进行，将会有一项拟议的 DIP 融资安排，资金将进入破产财产，然后推定将用于支付各类专业人员、United States Trustee（美国受托人）的费用，以及法院命令债务人支付的任何其他支出，或者一般为在到期时支付 Chapter 11（第 11 章）账单所需的任何其他支出。我认为就是这些。\n\n第 54 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：最后一项是文书工作。您预计您团队中的文书人员将在本案中履行何种职责？\n\n答：我没有预先设想他们在本案中要做什么。\n\n问：回到文件中的聘用协议，在第 13 页。我们已经总体讨论过 Verdolino and Lowey（Verdolino and Lowey 律师事务所）在本案中的受聘事项。我想逐项讨论第一页上的这些要点。第一项写道：“协助编制财务状况说明书、清单及其全部支持材料，以及任何修订”。这些已经提交了，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：谁参与了编制 SOFA 和清单？\n\n第 55 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：我所在律师事务所的人吗？\n\n问：V&L 的哪些人？\n\n答：我本人、Matthew Flynn（马修·弗林）和 Mary Jo Schindler（玛丽·乔·辛德勒）。\n\n问：还有谁参与了编制这些提交文件？\n\n答：可能有人就 Best Case 提出了技术问题，但我想不出还有其他任何人曾参与——还有其他任何人对其进行了工作。\n\n问：Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）是否参与了 SOFA 和清单的工作？\n\n答：您问的是我所在的律师事务所。当然，他们参与了，Melissa 也参与了——即 Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）。Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）也参与了。因此，显然并非全部由 Verdolino and Lowey 完成。整个团队都参与了编制工作。我以为您问的是——如果我误解了，我表示歉意——您问的是 Verdolino 的哪些人参与了，答案是我本人、Matt Flynn 和 Mary Jo Schindler。\n\n问：谢谢。是的，我问的是 Verdolino and Lowey，然后正要继续问下去。那么，您提到了 Melissa Francis、Aaron Mitchell、Brown Rudnick。总体而言，还有其他人吗？\n\n第 56 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：尽管我从未与他们交谈，但必定有一些人员协助将各种专业人员的文件和言语翻译给债务人，以及债务人。\n\n问：您是否就这份 SOFA 和清单与债务人沟通过？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您提到了一些翻译文件。您是否在您就 SOFA 和清单所做的工作中收到过那些翻译文件？\n\n答：没有。我不懂普通话。\n\n问：您是否看过任何翻译文件？\n\n答：我不记得看过。\n\nAULET 先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n问：您是否知道 Golden Spring（金泉）是否参与了 SOFA 和清单的编制？\n\n第 57 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您知道 Golden Spring 是什么吗？\n\n答：知道。\n\n问：它是什么？\n\n答：据我了解，它是债务人儿子在纽约市的一个家族办公室。至于其具体如何运作等情况，我没有任何信息。\n\n问：债务人的儿子是谁？\n\n答：我不知道他的名字。债务人的儿子。\n\n问：您和 Verdolino and Lowey 的任何人均未就 SOFA 和清单与债务人会面或沟通，对吗？\n\nAULET 先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您能否描述 Verdolino and Lowey 在编制 SOFA 和清单时所做的工作？\n\n答：我们与 Brown Rudnick 的多名人员进行了数次长时间电话会议，我记不清所有参加电话的人；还与 Melissa Francis 和 Aaron Mitchell 进行了沟通。Aaron Mitchell 和 Melissa Francis 提供了大量各种信息。Brown Rudnick 在我们之前就已参与本案。他们已经积累了大量知识基础，因此我们——我们通过电话与 Brown Rudnick 团队、Melissa 和 Aaron 交谈，随后进行了大量电子邮件往来。\n\n第 58 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n证人：我同意。热。\n\nHARBACH 先生：是的，我试图避开阳光。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 是否进行了任何调查，以核实从 Brown Rudnick、Melissa Francis 或 Aaron Mitchell 获得的信息？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：因此，可以公平地说，对于 SOFA 和清单中所载陈述，您采信了他们的说法，对吗？\n\n答：这很公平。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 是否预计还要就 SOFA 和清单进行任何未完成的工作？\n\n答：我不知道有任何预期工作，但如果在某个时候，事实和情况——据我了解——需要审查并可能修订，我认为我们将必须参与，因为我们是熟悉 Best Case 并拥有该系统的人，但目前没有任何预期工作。只有在该等情况实际出现时，我们才会参与。\n\n问：您已经数次提到 Best Case。您的意思是什么？\n\n答：它是一种行业使用的软件。我认为它是支持编制 SOFA 和清单的最主要软件。该行业中大多数人都在使用它。\n\n问：那么，可以公平地说，它就像编制 SOFA 和清单的 TurboTax（报税软件）吗？\n\n答：或者 QuickBooks（会计软件），或者——您知道。\n\n问：因此，该软件本质上是“输入垃圾，输出垃圾”，对吗？\n\nAULET 先生：异议。\n\n答：所有软件都是“输入垃圾，输出垃圾”。\n\n问：转到聘用协议中的第二个要点，其中写道：“协助编制和/或审查现金流及相关预算预测，包括就提交申请后的财务事项提供建议”。您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目做了哪些工作？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 预计将就该项目做什么工作？\n\n答：如果我们仍在本案中，并且存在 DIP，我预计会做这项工作。\n\n问：因此，这包括预算预测。为谁作预算预测？\n\n答：我设想，我们将尝试确定以下各方的预算，例如债权人委员会的律师及其财务顾问、债务人的律师及其财务顾问、United States Trustees（美国受托人）的费用，以及若干原本拟作为正常业务过程专业人员的律师事务所，还有本案中经法院命令以某种方式批准的任何其他预期支出。\n\n问：它还包括审查现金流。什么现金流？\n\n答：DIP 资金。\n\n问：债务人没有收入，对吗？\n\n答：据我所知，正确。\n\n问：您是否审阅过本案中提交的债务人声明？\n\n答：我当然审阅过其中一两份草稿。我不知道我是否看过最终版本。我不记得了。\n\n问：目前是否有任何来源的现金流入？\n\n答：流入破产财产吗？\n\n第 62 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：是。\n\n答：据我所知，没有。\n\n问：您对债务人没有收入的了解，是基于别人告诉您的内容，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您没有就其收入进行独立调查，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：该项目还提到了提交申请后的财务事项。这是什么意思？\n\n答：他于 February 15th 提交了申请。从该日开始的任何财务事项、现金收入、现金支出、预算。\n\n问：第三个项目写道：“开立和维护 DIP 账户，在必要时执行支出，并对全部现金活动进行会计核算”。您是否理解本案中存在 DIP 贷款？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您预计会有一笔 DIP 贷款吗？\n\n答：希望如此。\n\n问：您是否有 DIP 贷款方面的经验？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：您有多少经验？\n\n答：我不知道有数百宗涉及 DIP 贷款的案件。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目做了哪些工作？\n\nAULET 先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我们说的是第三项，对吗，即开立和维护 DIP 账户？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：我所做的唯一事情是，在 Brown Rudnick 问我是否愿意担任时，我咨询了一家银行，该银行在 Department of Justice（司法部）核准金融机构名单上。我向该银行确认——我在破产案件内外经常使用该银行——他们是否允许我成为 DIP 账户的签字人，他们答复说可以。这就是我在该事项上所做工作的全部。\n\n第 64 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：您所指的是 Citizens Bank（公民银行）吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 是否参与了潜在 DIP 贷款的谈判？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 是否被列入任何有关潜在 DIP 贷款的通信中？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您个人是否参与过任何有关 DIP 贷款的书面或口头通信？\n\n答：我不记得有。\n\n问：您是否了解潜在 DIP 贷款将如何构建？\n\n答：嗯，我在某个时候简要阅读过 DIP 贷款。我没有。\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：在本案中，您是否知道债务人占有融资（DIP融资）可能会如何构建？\n\n答：我只能凭记忆猜测。\n\n问：在 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊），谁会就这一项目开展工作？\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：以存在 DIP 融资为前提吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：如前所述，显然，我会是该账户的签署人。会有簿记员和工作人员负责准备支票、编制报告并向所有相关方报告。委员会可能会想了解——通常，他们希望每周或每两周了解一次收入和支出情况，主要债权人可能也会有同样的想法。因此，无论情况如何，随着报告要求逐步形成，我们都会处理。我不知道具体会是什么要求。除最低要求外，即月度经营报告。\n\n问：截至目前，Verdolino and Lowey 的运行费率是多少？\n\n答：什么是运行费率？\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 就本事项已开具了多少账单？\n\n答：截至目前，我们已开具零账单。\n\n问：Verdolino 预计其在本案中截至目前已计入多少价值？\n\n答：您是在问截至目前的在制工作（WIP）吗？\n\n问：截至目前的 WIP 是什么？\n\n答：在制工作工时？\n\n问：是，请说明。\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：如果 DIP 融资未能实现，Verdolino and Lowey 是否与任何人就由谁支付费用达成任何协议？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我们来看下一项目，“编制、审阅和分析月度经营报告及/或季度报告”。您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您此前提到，本案最近提交了一份月度经营报告？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：那是否是在本项目下预期开展的工作类型？\n\n答：嗯，今后将不仅仅是一份月度经营报告，因为将会有——嗯，推定而言，如果存在 DIP 融资且案件继续进行，将会有收入和支出；即使没有，美国受托人计划（United States Trustee Program）也要求月度经营报告以及披露在案件过程中产生的所有遗产专业人士。因此，由于财务状况说明书（SOFA）、财产清单、341 会议以及其他一切事项都在仓促处理，二月份的报告中没有发生这种情况。今后，我们必须按月及累计基础报告每个人的费用、现金流入和流出情况；月度经营报告的一部分还会计算应付给美国受托人计划的费用。通常，您还必须在月度经营报告中附上保险单据；如果有任何保险到期。我通常——通常我无论如何都会附上，以避免混淆及有人寻找该文件。然后还要附上完整的银行对账单。美国受托人办公室（United States Trustees Office）还要求资产负债表、损益表、现金流量表，以及应付账款、应收账款和各类其他资料。因此，第一份报告已经提交。今后的报告将包含更多信息。\n\n问：退一步说，您能否概括说明，在第11章个人案件中，月度经营报告是什么？\n\n答：我认为，它与商业案件中的经营报告相同或非常接近。至少在我看来是这样。但它是标准报告——在案件未决期间，美国受托人计划要求提交该经营报告，直至案件被驳回、转换或确认。\n\n问：那么，您所述与月度经营报告有关的工作程序，是以批准 DIP 融资并管理该等资金为前提的。对吗？\n\n答：嗯，无论是否有这种情况，都必须提交月度经营报告。委员会律师、我们、会计顾问、债务人、债务人委员会、其他人员以及任何可能由遗产支付费用的人员，包括正常业务范围内的人员，其费用的累计情况——即使没有 DIP 融资，也必须报告。\n\n问：截至目前，您编制过一份月度经营报告？\n\n答：在本案中？\n\n问：在本案中，对吗？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：另一份月度经营报告是否正在编制中？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否还编制了——Verdolino and Lowey 是否还编制了附表中所载的预计月度经营费用？\n\n答：您指的是什么？\n\n问：我们可以稍后再回来谈这个问题。\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：您或 Verdolino and Lowey 是否在本案中编制过季度报告？\n\n答：美国受托人季度报告？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：没有。我们不编制那个，是他们编制。\n\n问：什么是季度报告？\n\n答：美国受托人根据月度经营报告开具账单；对于符合美国受托人表格中“支出”定义的费用，他们将每个日历季度的三个月合并计算。因此，对我们而言，将包括2月15日、截至2月28日的短期期间，以及3月1日至3月31日的月度经营报告。该45天期间的总额将载入美国受托人办公室的账单中，并且，假设其正确，我相信必须在本月月底前支付。\n\n问：那么，说 Verdolino and Lowey 受聘审阅季度报告，是否公平？\n\n答：我不知道这里是否有具体列出，但当然，月度经营报告是提交给美国受托人办公室、用于生成账单的表格。因此，我们知道——费用是根据支出水平依法确定的。核对他们的工作非常容易。我们会这样做，并确保数字正确。该数字经常有误，因为他们有时会在3月份对账单实际收到之前开具账单。因此，他们是在估算。第一季度他们通常会有偏差——这不是他们的错——因为不是完整季度。他们没有作出估算的依据，无论情况如何；但我们会——我们会确保向美国受托人支付的费用在当时情况下是适当的。\n\n问：我们来看下一项目，“协助编制及/或审阅遗产联邦和州所得税申报”。Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目做了什么工作？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我认为您此前提到，您将建议提交所得税申报。您为何建议在本案中这样做？\n\n答：我在每个案件中都建议这样做。个人遗产税申报方面，个人遗产是与个人完全分离且不同的实体；与公司案件不同，公司保留其税务身份。如果它们是 C 类公司、S 公司、合伙企业，无论具体情况如何，您继续提交 C 类公司申报表，其纳税年度结束日仍为其在申请破产前确定的年度结束日。在破产案件中，遗产与个人是独立且不同的。个人必须继续就不进入遗产的个人收入提交其个人所得税申报表。在第11章案件中，债务人的几乎所有收入都应进入遗产。因此，实际上不应存在单独的一份，但从技术上说可能会有。遗产——除非另作选择，遗产申报表通常指定为12月31日。另作选择有其理由，但最重要的一点是，为获得《破产法》第505(b)条规定的救济，您必须提交税务申报表。因此，即使没有应缴税款，我也建议提交申报表，以保护所有人——案件中的每一个人，并确保不存在让各税务机关自提交附有505(b)函的申报表之日起60天内选择对其进行审计的问题。这是使案件能够走向结案，并且不受七年时效、三年时效及类似规定影响的方式。因此，我建议每个人都采取505(b)程序。如果他们未在最初60天内选择审计，则他们失去该机会。如果他们选择进行审计，那么他们还有120天。我希望——我建议在每一个案件中，无论是个人、公司、合伙企业还是有限责任公司（LLC），无论税务申报表是否必要、是否依法要求，均提交税务申报表，并附上505(b)函。\n\n问：如果债务人选择提交申报表，您是否预计本事项中将提交多份申报表？\n\n答：嗯，我不知道债务人将会怎么做，而且再次说明，这与遗产无关，也与 Verdolino and Lowey 无关；但遗产将必须提交——我会建议其提交一份联邦申报表。债务人是康涅狄格州居民，因此将会有一份康涅狄格州遗产税申报表；如果因某种原因有来自另一州的收入，我们将向该收入来源州提交申报表。因此，我不知道具体会是什么，但至少将涉及康涅狄格州和美国国税局（IRS）。\n\n问：我认为我们之前已经谈过，您的理解是债务人在本案中没有收入？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：就债务人的个人税务申报表，您预计 Verdolino and Lowey 将开展什么工作？\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我必须猜测2月15日至12月31日期间会发生什么。我不知道是否会有任何收入。目前正在进行诉讼。可能会有和解。我不知道是否会有收入；但如果有，就会有收入。我不知道来源为何，也不知道来自何处；但至少会有支出。从税务角度看，在破产中有两类费用。有诸如专业人士费用的行政费用，也有对个人而言属于正常的其他类型费用。抵押贷款利息、不动产税，无论具体情况如何。它们在税务申报表上以不同方式处理，但提交申报表的原因之一是——就破产遗产的税务而言，支付给专业人士的费用属于\n\n可扣除，您可以将其累积起来，就像一项递延所得税资产一样。因此，在未来——在我们为该案件支出款项之后——如果将来达成一项大额和解协议，您将能够以前述行政性净经营亏损（NOL）抵销未来收入——\n\n法庭记录员：前述行政性——\n\n证人：N-O——净经营亏损，以抵销未来收款；这也是应当提交申报表的另一个理由。\n\n问：是否可以说，Verdolino and Lowey 预计可能就纳税申报表开展的工作，取决于未来是否有现金流入债务人或破产财产？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：不是。您将会有——您将会有应计费用，取决于——取决于案件的时间安排及其他一切情况，应计费用可以扣除。因此，现金——显然，如果有现金，那将——那将必须予以处理，但取决于本案的进展和时间安排，部分应计费用完全可能可以扣除。\n\n问：您是否看过债务人最近的纳税申报表？\n\n答：我不知道是否能称其为最近的纳税申报表，但我看过部分内容。我不知道是否是完整文件。我不知道我是否看过完整的联邦申报表和完整的州申报表，但我——我至少看过纽约州申报表，以及附在纽约州申报表上的联邦版本；我认为那可能是也可能不是2019年和2020年的完整联邦申报表。\n\n问：如果债务人的收入为零，您预计从何项中扣除？\n\nAULET先生：异议。\n\n答：我们说的是债务人个人，还是破产财产？\n\n问：先说债务人。\n\n答：我不——债务人在破产财产之外发生什么，不是我的问题或利益所在。他将不得不聘请另一名会计师来处理此事。\n\n问：我们谈谈破产财产。\n\n答：如果破产财产有应税交易，如我所述，我会建议破产财产及时提交纳税申报表，其中将包括破产法典和《国内税收法典》均允许的任何交易活动，而我不知道那会是什么。\n\n问：转到下一项，其内容为：“协助审查、核对、分析，以及在必要时对债权申报提出异议”。Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目开展了什么工作？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：一般而言，什么是——什么是债权申报？\n\n答：它是一份表格。有一份表格。有一份破产表格是债权申报。我不记得表格编号，但它让任何主张自己为债权人的人有机会在第11章或第7章案件中申报债权。他们可以以有担保、优先、行政性等为依据申报债权，我确信还有其他类别是我遗漏的。我认为不存在债权异议期限，但在某个时候，在第11章案件中，通常会有债权异议期限。不过，如果某债权人已被列入附表D、E或F，且该金额恰好正确，那么据我了解，该债权人无需申报债权。如果他们不同意，因为欠付金额更多或更少——如果欠付金额更少，他们很少会不同意；但如果欠付金额更多，他们可以提交债权申报，并确定他们认为破产财产应向其支付的金额。\n\n问：您是否审查过本案中的任何未决诉讼债权？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 在分析未决诉讼债权胜诉可能性方面具有什么经验？\n\n答：完全没有。\n\n问：转到下一项，“协助审查债务人的账簿和记录，以查找可能可撤销的交易，例如偏颇清偿和欺诈性转让债权”。您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能否向我一般性地解释，这是什么意思？\n\n答：破产法典允许追溯期。对于偏颇清偿，它允许就申请破产前90天提出偏颇清偿债权，至于其定义，我交由律师界定；而内部人及其他欺诈性转让发生在零天至——我听说是——无论相关事项适用的法定期限为何，一年、两年、四年，不论具体情况如何；但它是对交易进行搜索，以查看其中是否有任何交易可能被撤销并可为破产财产追回。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目进行了何种分析？\n\nAULET先生：我提醒证人，在存在任何相关内容的范围内，不要披露任何具体情况。\n\nARONSSON女士：抱歉，您是什么意思？\n\nAULET先生：如果他做过任何工作，该工作将受工作成果特权保护。不要披露那些具体情况。\n\n问：撇开Brown Rudnick就该项目主张的工作成果保护，您能回答该问题吗？\n\n答：财务状况说明书中的一个问题，是在破产前90天内作出的付款。我不知道这是否必然会令任何人感到意外，但这通常是找人对偏颇清偿进行分析的起点。我们当然参与了准备工作，因为是我们提交了该等文件。\n\n问：您知道本案披露了多少笔申请破产前付款吗？\n\n答：不知道。\n\n问：21这个数字听起来正确吗？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：因此，该项目提及债务人的账簿和记录，以查找可能可撤销的交易。您是否就本次委聘审查过任何债务人的账簿和记录？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 是否就本次委聘审查过任何账簿和记录？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否可以说，Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目依赖其他方的协助？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：您说的是过去时还是将来时？\n\n问：过去时。\n\n答：就我们所做的一切而言，我们从信息角度依赖其他个人。\n\nAULET先生：已经进行了一段时间，所以如果您需要休息——\n\n证人：不，我们把——让我们一次做完。我想在今晚之前离开这里。\n\nGOLDMAN先生：我们将在12点休息。\n\nHARBACH先生：是，先生。\n\n问：好的，转到下一项，“协助提供任何必要的诉讼支持”。我认为我们之前已经谈过这个。关于我们尚未讨论的、与该项目有关的潜在服务，您还有任何补充吗？\n\n答：据我记得，没有。\n\n问：截至目前，Verdolino and Lowey 是否就该项目开展过任何工作？\n\n答：在本案中，没有。\n\n问：下一项——转到下一项，是“协助制定和准备计划，包括可行性”。这是什么意思？\n\n答：为了成功完成第11章程序，您必须确认一项重整计划，或无论其在被准备和制定时会采用何种标题。据我所知，它甚至可能是一项联合计划。在这些计划中，通常会有一些预算，因为有时对债权人的付款会随着时间推移而支付。我们可能会协助编制未来一段期间内收款和支出的现金流预测，而且我——我不是律师，但据我了解，为了确认第11章计划，您必须证明债权人根据第11章计划获得的回报，将比他们在第7章案件中获得的回报更好，而这通常要求您——嗯，您将需要可行性，而且您还将需要——另一个是什么——那个术语我一时想不起来——我记不起来，但反正它没有列出来。\n\n问：该项目写的是可行性，我认为您也提到了这一点。可行性是什么意思？\n\n答：预测通常是用以使法院和其他利害关系方能够确定未来现金流的证据，并使其据此自行决定债务人的计划在财务上是否可行；当然，法官拥有最终决定权，但通常每个人都会发表自己的意见。\n\n问：截至目前，Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目进行了什么分析？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：如果债务人破产财产唯一的收入或资产来源是已清算的诉讼债权，Verdolino and Lowey 是否会在制定计划中发挥作用？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：如果有，规模将会非常小。\n\n问：明白。您是否知道目前有任何计划草案正在流转？\n\nAULET先生：异议。他已经作证说，他并未就此开展任何工作。因此，我不明白这与V&L的委聘有何关联。\n\nARONSSON女士：当然。不过，我对与该项目有关的持续工作感到好奇。\n\nAULET先生：如果他正在就此开展任何当前工作，他可以回答。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：转到——转到下一页的下一项，其内容为：“就可能出现并可能由您或债务人指示的任何其他事项和任务提供一般咨询和协助”。是否可以说，这有点像一个兜底条款？\n\n答：是。这是一个兜底条款，但有一个限制条件——这不是我第一次处理这种事——如果出于某种原因，需要一项范围广泛且成本高昂的独立任务，我们将提交动议以修改我们的聘用范围，即该聘用将涵盖什么；但至于——例如，有时他们会收到美国国税局（IRS）的一份通知，只需某人花15分钟予以回应。我知道有些——一些零零碎碎、不属于其他任何事项的小事，这是对这些细枝末节的兜底。并非旨在成为重大项目的兜底条款，这只是为了保护我。\n\n问：Verdolino 就该项目开展了什么工作或分析，如有？\n\n答：据我所知，没有。\n\n问：您熟悉一家名为Stretto（Stretto）的公司吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：他们做什么？\n\n答：我不知道他们所做的一切，但他们从事债权代理工作及其他与破产有关的工作。我不知道他们的服务清单是什么。我自己曾在案件中聘用过他们。我认为他们现在仍在有限范围内为我处理一两个案件。\n\n问：您知道Stretto参与了本案吗？\n\n答：我知道有一项聘用他们的动议，是的。\n\n问：一般而言，您对Stretto可能受聘开展的工作范围有何理解？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您之前提到，您过去曾与Stretto合作过？\n\n答：嗯，他们与我们处于同——一些相同的——嗯，几个。一两个我们参与的相同案件中。\n\n问：您是否了解Stretto能否开立和维持一项DIP账户？\n\n答：不。\n\n问：您是否了解Stretto能否监控与DIP相关的付款\n\n答：我没有看过他们的聘用动议。不知道他们的——\n\n阿伦松女士：让我们暂停记录。谢谢。\n\n摄像记录员：时间为上午11:53，现暂停记录。\n\n（随后，短暂休庭。）\n\n摄像记录员：时间为下午12:22。现恢复记录。\n\n问：刚才结束了与证物4有关的问题。回到关于开立和维持DIP账户的项目，您是否同意，银行或托管代理人可以开立和维持DIP账户？\n\n奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不知道他们为何不能这样做，但我当然不是专家。\n\n问：那么，监督支出及执行支出呢？\n\n答：由银行来做吗？\n\n问：是的。\n\n答：我不认为银行会做这件事。\n\n问：或者由托管代理人。\n\n答：托管代理人会承担更多义务，具体取决于托管协议的规定。我不——\n\n问：但可以聘用托管代理人履行这些职责吗？\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝）\n\n问：账户？\n\n答：不。\n\n问：转到“账簿和记录”项目的第七个要点，我要请您假定，有21家专业服务提供者在提交申请前90天内收到了破产申请前付款。我还要请您假定，Stretto（斯特雷托）可以就这些付款提供分析。为何有必要由Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）履行这些职责？\n\n奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。这要求作出推测。\n\n答：凡是稍微有点脑子的人都能做这件事。这不会由我来做。\n\n阿伦松女士：法庭记录员将向您出示标记为贾尔贝证物5的文件。\n\n（随后，官方表格106Sum于本日由记录员标记为贾尔贝证物5，以供识别。）\n\n阿伦松女士：为记录起见，我说明一下，这是一份已在本案中作为案卷编号78提交的文件。\n\n问：您认识这份文件吗，贾尔贝先生？\n\n答：认识。\n\n问：这是什么？\n\n答：第一页是官方表格106Sum，即债务人Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的资产和负债摘要及某些统计信息。\n\n问：我认为我们之前讨论过，Verdolino and Lowey在编制SOFA和清单方面发挥了作用。对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey在编制这份文件方面发挥了作用？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：我只是想从总体上过一遍。第一个项目是——项目1涉及财产。该项目包括什么？\n\n答：具体是指什么——A、B或C，还是全部？\n\n问：抱歉，这是个合理的问题。1A。\n\n答：嗯，其中写道：“清单A/B财产官方表格106A/B”，问题或1A，“抄录清单A/B中第55行的不动产总额”。\n\n问：谢谢。其显示为零？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey为了编制该项目，进行了何种分析（如有）？\n\n答：我与律师共同工作。\n\n问：您是否就项目1A进行了任何独立调查？\n\n奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：转到1B，其中写道：“清单A/B中的个人财产总额”，我认为这指向第36行？\n\n答：我本以为它指向第62行。\n\n问：确实如此，然后是第62行。抱歉——因此第62行又指向第56至61行。您看到了吗？那在PDF的第7页。\n\n答：第56至61行，是您所指的吗？\n\n问：对。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：第55至61行中唯一填列的项目是第58项？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：第58项指向第36行？\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：因此，第36行，就在本页上方，这里的总额为3,850美元。您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：因此，第36行将本次提交文件第4部分汇总为一个数字。这样说公平吗？\n\n奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：您所说的本次提交文件，是指清单A/B的第4部分吗？\n\n问：是的。感谢您的澄清。\n\n答：我同意，第36行是第4部分的总和，该部分从问题16开始。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey就这些项目进行了何种分析（如有）？\n\n答：无论我们做了什么，都是与律师共同完成的。\n\n问：我要请您翻到该文件的第3页。\n\n奥莱特先生：仅为澄清起见，您每次提到第3页时，指的是上方的页码？\n\n阿伦松女士：是的。我指的是上方的案卷页码。23页中的第3页。\n\n问：从这里的第1部分开始，Verdolino and Lowey是否就该项目开展了任何工作？\n\n答：如果我们做了，也是与律师共同做的。\n\n问：在第2部分中，第3项和第4项涉及汽车、厢式货车、卡车等，以及船只、航空器，Verdolino and Lowey是否就本节开展了任何工作？\n\n答：全部都是与律师共同完成的。\n\n问：因此，可以公平地说，当您说与律师共同开展工作时，您没有进行任何独立调查？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：第3部分，第6项至第15项涉及个人和家庭物品，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：不逐项讨论，您是否——Verdolino and Lowey是否就第6项至第14项开展了任何工作？\n\n答：没有——并非未与律师共同进行。\n\n问：为澄清您的角色，律师是否向您提供信息，而您负责起草该表格，还是您依赖律师起草该表格？\n\n奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：显然，我们在协商后将信息键盘录入表格。\n\n问：除将信息键盘录入表格外，您还做了什么？\n\n答：我们与律师讨论了相关事项。\n\n问：我问的是，在提交清单和SOFA时，当您说与律师沟通时，您指的是Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）？\n\n答：以及Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）和Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）。\n\n问：您或Verdolino and Lowey是否与Brown Rudnick、Melissa Francis和Aaron Mitchell的律师以外的任何人沟通过？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在录入这些项目时，是否有任何一方向您提供事实或信息？\n\n答：律师向我们告知了许多事实，也进行了许多讨论。\n\n问：是否——不问这个。您收到的信息是口头的吗？\n\n答：有些是口头的，有些我相信是律师通过电子邮件提供的。\n\n哈巴赫先生：您介意我问几个问题吗？\n\n阿伦松女士：当然。\n\n奥莱特先生：我没有异议。\n\n哈巴赫先生：谢谢。\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝）\n\n以下由哈巴赫先生询问：\n\n问：为记录起见，我是O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）的David Harbach（戴维·哈巴赫），也代理Pax（派克斯）。我只有几个问题。先生，我相信您之前提到，您或Verdolino and Lowey参与协助编制已提交清单的注释？我理解得对吗？\n\n答：注释的具体部分——\n\n问：是的，先生。具体注释。不是一般性的——\n\n答：明白。\n\n问：具体注释载于案卷中的文件编号77。我没有多余副本给您，但我希望您会同意这并非必要。当涉及诸如电子产品、家庭用品和家具等问题时，我的同事刚才正向您询问这些问题，具体注释例如写道：“许多符合个人和家庭用品定义的物品位于住所和公寓内”，随后又写道：“除非本文另有规定，债务人对住所或公寓内物品均无法定所有权，且任何法院均未作出债务人对任何此类物品享有任何其他权益的认定。”我要问您的是，Verdolino and Lowey是否以任何方式参与评估这些家庭物品中是否有任何物品属于债务人？\n\n奥莱特先生：我仅对在未向其出示该文件的情况下就该文件向其提问提出异议。若您能够回答，您可以回答。\n\n答：为澄清起见，您是在问我是否调查过锅铲、锅碗瓢盆是否存在、是谁购买的、其价值多少，以及它们是否在房屋内？\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions（Veritext 法律解决方案）866 299-5127\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：我想问的只是，Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）是否在决定该住所或公寓内的家居物品属于 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵），还是将此事留给律师作出决定这一判断过程中发挥了任何作用？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：我们没有进行任何调查。除 Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）、Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）和 Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）告知我的情况外，我对那些物品的所有权没有任何个人了解。因此，这不是我的决定，我也没有进行调查，但我当然参与了有关该事项的讨论。\n\n问：在那些讨论中，如果其中一人，即 Brown Rudnick 的一名律师或 Melissa——我忘了她的姓氏——\n\n答：Francis。\n\n问：Francis，谢谢。如果她向您表示那些物品不属于郭先生，您就照单全收了？\n\n答：正确。\n\n第 102 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\nHARBACH 先生：好的，谢谢。谢谢你，Laura。\n\n继续询问\n\nARONSSON 女士询问：\n\n问：我是 O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）的 Laura Aronsson（劳拉·阿伦松）。回到我们刚才就附表所谈的内容。我认为 David 已经谈到过这个问题。那么，在起草这份文件时，您如何决定诸如第 7 项中提到的 iPhone、第 11 项中提到的衣物或第 13 项中提到的家庭宠物狗等物品，是属于郭先生而不是另一名个人或实体？\n\n答：Melissa Francis 或 Aaron Mitchell 告知了我，或者他们告知 Brown Rudnick，而 Brown Rudnick 又告知我们。\n\n问：是否可以说，您刚才描述的这一事件链条适用于该附表中列明的所有物品？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不知道——如果您想这样做，我们最好逐项看。我不知道您指的是什么。您知道，您谈的是具体哪些项目？\n\n第 103 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：当然，这很公平。那么，就该附表中被列为属于郭先生的任何资产而言，您完全依赖于您先前描述的事件链条，即 Brown Rudnick 从 Melissa Francis 和 Aaron Mitchell 获得信息？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：不，这不是我所说的。我说的是，我们直接从 Melissa Francis 或 Aaron Mitchell 那里获悉，或者他们告知 Brown Rudnick，而 Brown Rudnick 告诉我他们给出的答案。不存在唯一的沟通方式。这是一个动态的情况。我们只有很短的时间来完成这些事情，但并非只有一种或另一种方式。如我所说，要么如此，而且很多时候电子邮件会发送给所有律师，或者是有很多方参加的电话会议；我不记得所有参与方，但对我们而言，信息来源首先是 Aaron Mitchell 和 Melissa Francis，没有特定顺序。现在，我不记得谁对什么了解得更多，也不记得他们是否将信息传给 Brown Rudnick，后者随后又将其传给我们。当然，这是在他们完成其希望进行的任何法律分析之后。\n\n问：在准备这些文件时，您是否向 Brown Rudnick、Aaron Mitchell 或 Melissa Francis 要求过他们没有向您提供的信息？\n\n答：我不记得曾问过他们未回答的问题，但我没有调查任何事情。\n\n问：我想请您看这份文件的第 16 页。请注意页面底部，第 2 部分写道：“估算您的持续每月支出”。您参与起草这一部分了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您的角色是——或者，\n\n第 105 页\n\n（第 102—105 页）\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：划掉。Verdolino and Lowey 在这一部分中扮演了什么角色？\n\n答：我们与法律团队进行了讨论，即 Brown Rudnick 团队，加上 Aaron Mitchell，再加上 Melissa Francis，可能不止一次，可能是口头讨论，可能通过电子邮件，这是一项讨论。\n\n问：翻到下一页，估计的每月运营费用为零。对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否预计债务人的每月运营费用在此之后仍将为零？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：这当然与律师们讨论过。我认为这不是什么秘密。昨天进行了很多讨论。因此，我的预期是肯定的，就他的支出而言，我认为他支付其支出将继续为零。\n\n问：我认为您说的是他的——他的支出。在您看来，他的支出涵盖什么？\n\n答：这里有一整份清单。您想逐项看吗？看起来大约有 30 项。不动产税、财产保险、房主保险和租户保险、房屋维护、修理和保养费用、房主协会费和公寓费用。我甚至不知道这些是否适用。电费、供暖费和天然气费。要我继续吗？\n\n第 106 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：那么，我们可以同意第 4 项至第 21 项会包括每月支出？\n\n答：再次说明，就由他支付这些费用而言，我同意。我的理解是，它们将继续为零。\n\n问：那么，这份文件所载的分析与您和 Verdolino 起草的与本案有关的月度经营报告是分开的？\n\n答：正确，因为月度经营报告是另一份报告，与这里所问的问题完全不同。\n\n问：您能向我解释一下区别吗？\n\n答：我不记得是哪一个问题，是第 4、5 或 6E 项还是什么，其要求是报告他人代表债务人支付的费用。这里并没有这样要求。因此，在该附表中，我们列出了一些资金；今后，我们将按照 MOR 的要求列明并报告他人代表债务人支付的费用，这再次不同于这里所问的内容。\n\n问：聚焦于这里所问的内容，您的理解是债务人的持续每月支出为零？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：债务人对持续支出的支付为零。\n\n问：您没有调查这是否正确？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：仅就本文件末尾的 Excel 表格而言，先从总体上说，Verdolino and Lowey 是否参与准备这些文件？\n\n答：嗯，我们当然与其他人一起参与了，是的。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 就这些文件总体而言做了哪些工作？\n\n答：审阅其合理性，协助将其整理成通常会出现在 SOFA 和附表中的形式。我认为其中一些内容被上传到实际的附表 F 中，因为我认为附表 F——嗯，也许没有。我不知道。我不记得这些内容是否被上传，但有可能。因此——因此它从 D 开始。我们就所有这些内容与律师合作，而且再次说明，是所有三方，即 Brown Rudnick 团队、Aaron Mitchell 和 Melissa Francis。\n\n第 109 页\n\n（第 106—109 页）\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：我认为您使用了“审阅其合理性”这一表述。这是什么意思？\n\n答：嗯，如果我们有可供比较的信息，我们就会将其进行比较；或者，如果我们有问题，我们就会向律师提问。我一时记不起那些问题是什么。\n\n问：总体而言，您能想到在准备这些文件时调查过哪些问题吗？\n\n答：我确信，就其中几个而言，我们想确保没有漏掉数字或多出数字，所以我确信我的团队中有人与某人逐项核对，可能是 Melissa 或 Aaron，只是为了再次核实表格上的数字是他们意图填写的数字，其间没有人为错误。\n\n问：您能想到您调查过的其他具体事项吗？\n\n答：我们没有进行调查。\n\n第 110 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\nARONSSON 女士：法庭记录员将向您出示标记为 Jalbert Exhibit 6 的文件。这是一份在本案中以 Docket 77 提交的文件。\n\n（于是，记录员于本日将 Global Notes 标记为 Jalbert Exhibit 6，以供识别。）\n\n问：您认得这份文件吗？\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：它是什么？\n\n答：关于债务人资产和负债附表及财务状况说明书的 Global Notes and Statements of Limitations Methodology and Disclaimers（全球说明、限制方法和免责声明），债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）。\n\n问：这是否是 Verdolino and Lowey 拟议受聘所涉的一项具体工作内容？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：我可以回去看一下吗？我不知道全球说明是否列出，但这些是 SOFA 和附表不可分割的一部分。因此，这将属于第一项要点，即“协助准备财务状况说明书和附表及其所有支持材料，以及在必要时进行的任何修订”。\n\n第 111 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 在准备这份文件中扮演了什么角色？\n\n答：嗯，我们当然协助起草。我们协助审阅，特别是具体说明，但 Brown Rudnick 律师事务所、Aaron Mitchell、Melissa Francis 和 Verdolino and Lowey 之间进行了大量来回沟通和大量工作，Verdolino and Lowey 的三人，即 Matt Flynn（马特·弗林）、Mary Jo Schindler（玛丽·乔·辛德勒）和我本人，也都参与其中。\n\n问：为了理解清楚，Verdolino and Lowey 在准备这份文件时具体做了什么工作？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，如我所说，我们有大量电子邮件，我们审阅了所有内容，我们提出了意见。我们可能起草了这里一段或那里一段。我认为，我们协助该团队确保说明之间、问题之间、SOFA 之间以及附表之间的引用，在它们相互关联的范围内，都是恰当的。我们确保这些文字是我们所知的事实。没有调查，但我们进行了很多讨论，并且确保这里所陈述的是我们的记忆。\n\n第 112 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：谢谢。翻到第 4 页，页面中部的问题 1 问道：“您是否拥有或对任何住宅、建筑物、土地或类似财产享有任何法定或衡平权益？”其下第 1 项的回答写道：“债务人对位于 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）Greenwich（格林尼治）373 Taconic Road 的不动产享有使用和占有权。”您是否了解为什么某些不动产的使用和占有权与本次提交相关？\n\nAULET 先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我不是律师，但是\n\n第 113 页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n附表 A 据我所知是由债务人拥有的不动产。我需要回头确认这一点，但属于不动产。因此，它将是——他仍在世期间，他居住于一处住所，我推定这是对其居住于该住所的事实和情形的适当法律描述。\n\n问：再次确认，您未就此进行任何独立调查？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您是否对问题 1 中列出的住所进行了任何评估？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：第二个要点提到 Sherry Netherland Hotel（雪莉荷兰人酒店）的一套公寓？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您起草了这一部分吗？\n\n答：我起草的吗？我对此表示怀疑。我可能审阅过它。我可能对某些内容提出过意见，但这不是我的用语。\n\n问：您是否知悉持有 Sherry Netherland（雪莉荷兰人）公寓法定所有权的实体正在破产程序中？\n\n答：嗯，我知道有一项 Chapter 11（第 11 章）程序正在进行。具体 Chapter 11 中有什么以及谁拥有什么，我没有确认或进行调查；但一般而言，我理解该公寓以某种方式处于纽约的 Chapter 11 程序中。\n\n问：您是否参与了纽约的那些程序？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：转到下一页，问题 3 概括而言询问对任何车辆所享有的权益。答复称：“债务人有权使用包括豪华汽车和摩托车在内的汽车。”您是否就该分析进行过任何调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否了解债务人使用哪些车辆？\n\n答：仅凭我的记忆，他——他可以使用一辆豪华车辆，而且我认为有一辆供其安保人员乘坐的车辆。事实上，他们周三在 New Haven（纽黑文）参加 341 会议时乘坐的就是那辆车，但我不知道——我知道那是一辆有价值的车。我不知道其名称，也不知道谁拥有它。我知道债务人——正如这里所述，债务人有权使用。\n\n问：因此，除这里所述及您先前的答复外，您是否还有关于债务人有权使用的车辆的任何其他信息？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否曾在任何时候目睹债务人使用任何豪华车辆？\n\n答：我不知道您所说的“使用”是什么意思，但他周三在 New Haven（纽黑文）从一辆车里出来。\n\n问：您知道那是什么类型的车吗？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：这是否——撤回。问题 3 的答复是否与编制月度经营报告有关？\n\n答：很可能有关。\n\n问：为什么？\n\n答：因为我想象，为其使用而提供那些车辆会产生相关费用；而且，我不确切记得问题 4、5 或 6，诸如 E 项，其中规则规定应报告第三方代表债务人支付的费用。嗯，我在想车辆的使用——您知道，我不知道是否有汽车付款、汽油、保险，我不知道，但其中可能会有某些项目。\n\n问：那么，无论车辆本身是在何时购买，购买车辆本身是否与月度经营报告有关？\n\n答：嗯，月度经营报告通常是某一特定期间的支出。我想，如果他们在程序进行期间购买了其中一辆车，也许会显示出来。我不知道。另一方面，您可以主张，使用车辆与购买车辆并非同一回事，因为也许其他人也使用它。因此，您必须设法分摊费用。\n\n问：该答复也适用于有关住所的问题 1 吗？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：债务人居住于某一特定住所。据我所知，除了一名上门的女佣、安保人员以及可能的家人来访外，那里没有其他人。因此，我想该住所的费用会在该月度经营报告中以某种金额列入；而且我认为——我主张其中 50% 的费用应代表债务人支付，因为其配偶也住在那里，而我没有计算孩子，因为他们只是来探望债务人。因此，我将更多费用归于母亲和父亲，并分摊费用，但其中没有购房费用。没有——再次说明，这是您在该当月支付的费用。因此，我假定他们是在说——我们将披露在该特定期间代表债务人就各类项目支付的费用，即车辆、安保、住宅——\n\n答：食物。\n\n问：谢谢。问题 4 提到船只、飞机、房车，答复提及先前有权使用一艘名为 Lady May（梅女士号）的游艇。除本页所载内容外，您是否了解 Kwok 先生（郭文贵）对 Lady May（梅女士号）享有的权益？\n\n答：没有任何未载于本页的内容。\n\n问：您是否就此进行过任何独立调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：第 6 项和第 7 项，家居用品和电子产品。我认为我们之前已谈及该问题。关于第 6 项家居用品至本页的问题 17——为清楚起见，即问题 6、7、8、9、11、17——您是否调查过这里提及的物品是属于 Kwok 先生（郭文贵）还是属于其他第三方或实体？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：转到第 8 页，问题 26 询问专利、版权、商标等等。答复提及音乐及发布到各个平台的视频中未登记的版权和其他知识产权权益。这是指什么？\n\n答：全部内容吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：问题 26 涉及各种知识产权专利、版权、商标、商业秘密及知识产权。债务人——我直接读给您听：“债务人可能对发布至各类数字和媒体平台（如 YouTube、GTV、Twitter）的音乐和视频享有未登记的版权及其他知识产权权益”，以及——我甚至不知道，GETTR，不管那是什么。“债务人未对其社交媒体资产估定任何价值，也未试图将其社交媒体影响力变现。”\n\n问：除页面所写内容外，您是否了解这是指什么？\n\n答：不了解。\n\n问：第二句话指出，债务人未对这些项目估定任何价值，您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您在工作中未对这些项目进行任何估值？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您是否知道是否进行过任何估值？\n\n答：据我所知，没有。\n\n问：问题 31 询问权益和保险单。答复提及其配偶的健康保险单，该保险单没有现金价值。您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：健康保险单没有现金价值是否属于标准做法？\n\n答：我从未见过健康保险单具有现金价值的情况，除非是对受益人而言——如果您有健康保险计划，在您去医院并由其为您支付账单时，它对您很有价值。它并不存在可出售给第三方的独立价值。\n\n问：您是否了解债务人目前拥有的健康保险单？\n\n答：不了解。\n\n问：问题 53 询问未列出的种类财产，答复提及其在 Palm Beach（棕榈滩）Mar-a-Lago Club（海湖庄园俱乐部）的会员资格。如果债务人 Kwok 先生（郭文贵）使用该会员资格，这是否属于 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）会列入月度经营报告的事项？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我必须作出推测。\n\n问：请说。\n\n答：嗯，第一份月度经营报告是在二月份提交的。我不知道他是否去过那里。我不知道他三月份是否去过那里。如果他——如果他去了那里，我想会有旅行费用。我不知道是否会有高尔夫费用，也许他吃了午餐。因此，我想如果他亲自去了那里并使用了它，月度经营报告中会有——可能会有——会有某些项目；但如果他留在我认为他会留在的地方，即他在 Greenwich（格林尼治）安全停留之处，这就不会相关。\n\n问：您认为他会留在 Greenwich（格林尼治）现居之处的依据是什么？\n\n答：我昨天——抱歉，是周三——听取了 341 会议。\n\n问：除周三该次听证会、即 341 听证会中获得的知识外，您是否对债务人预期的旅行或所在地有任何独立了解？\n\n答：我完全不知道他在任何时间点会在哪里。\n\n问：在编制月度经营报告时，您是否会依赖 Brown Rudnick（布朗·鲁德尼克律师事务所）、Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）和 Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）向您说明他可能如何从诸如其 Mar-a-Lago Club（海湖庄园俱乐部）会员资格之类的事项中获益？\n\n答：当然，我肯定会听取律师对此的意见。\n\n问：但 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）不会设法主动寻找有关这些月度费用的信息——\n\n答：嗯，我们会寻找，我们会指出问题，并要求提供对该问题有回应的信息。我无法获得这些信息。我们不进行调查。我不会追踪债务人去了哪里或没有去哪里。因此，需要有人向我们提供信息。然后我们会审阅它；但我——我认为至少在可预见的未来，那个 Mar-a-Lago（海湖庄园）事项不是问题；但如果它成为问题，会有人告诉我。\n\n问：转到第 11 页，附表 I，这里倒数第二句称：“债务人计划修正于 February 15th, 2022 提交的 Form 122B，其中债务人错误地申报月收入为 $19,488。”您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您知道那是指什么吗？\n\n答：知道。\n\n问：是什么？\n\n答：债务人无意中或意外地——我不知道应使用什么术语——错误地提交了一份 Form 122B。其列入了 $19,488，这符合——该表格符合月收入，我认为律师审阅后认为那是不正确的，因此他们——债务人提交了一份修正后的 122B，或者至少打算——我不知道是否已经完成——将该收入排除在外。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）是否就该错误列入事项开展过任何工作？\n\n答：我确信我们所做的任何工作都是在——\n\n经与律师协商。\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。抱歉。\n\n问：转到第13页，第16题提到向 Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）支付500 thousand的聘用费，随后提到来自 Lamp Capital LLC（兰普资本有限责任公司）的one million dollars。除页面所载内容外，您是否知悉该项交易？\n\n答：我认为昨天——对不起，是星期三——在341会议上对此有过讨论，而且我想我看过 Brown Rudnick 的聘用文件草稿——我想我确实看过，其中似乎提到了某些内容。\n\n问：您记得那是什么吗？\n\n答：不记得。大致与这里所写的内容相同。\n\n问：您知道 Lamp Capital LLC 是什么吗？\n\n答：由非债务人的某人拥有的实体。\n\n问：您知道它由谁拥有吗？\n\n第126页\n\n答：只能猜测。\n\n问：您可以告诉我——我想您不需要猜测。您是否有任何信息——关于形成您猜测依据的信息？\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我记得当时谈论了很多事情，但我记得在341会议期间有人说过什么，不过我当时——如您所知——坐得很靠后，而且我很难从译员那里听清英文。因此我不能确定，但我想我听到有人讨论谁拥有 Lamp。\n\n问：除您在341听证会上所听到的内容以及您记得看过的另一份文件外，您是否知悉有关 Lamp 或其运营的任何情况？\n\n答：不知道。\n\n问：下一项，第18题提到一份日期为 November 8th, 2021 的诉讼融资协议。您看过该协议吗？\n\n第127页\n\n答：实际上我想共有五份。它们列在附表D中。我不记得自己是否实际看过它们。我想至少律师曾向我简要说明过。\n\n问：除——之外，您是否独立知悉这些协议？\n\n答：不知道。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）是否就我们谈到的资产进行了任何其他、我们尚未涵盖的调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我们谈到的那五份诉讼协议——\n\n答：诉讼融资协议？\n\n问：是的，谢谢。您以前看过它们吗？\n\n答：据我所知没有。\n\n阿伦松女士：法庭记录员将向您出示标记为 Jalbert Exhibit 7 的文件。这是在本案中出示的文件，Bates编号为 Kwok 00001752。\n\n奥莱特先生：为记录起见，这是两份单独的文件，因此我们应当确保——\n\n阿伦松女士：我声明，这是同一组文件，即一封电子邮件及其附件。\n\n（于是，电子邮件链由记录员于本日标记为 Jalbert Exhibit 7，供识别之用。）\n\n问：Jalbert先生，我知道您不在这封电子邮件中。我只想就此向您提几个基本问题。这是一封在一名被遮盖姓名的人、Aaron Mitchell（艾伦·米切尔）、Matt Flynn（马特·弗林）和 Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）之间往来的电子邮件。Matt Flynn 是您的同事。我们已经谈过其他人。附件是 February 15th 至 28th 期间生活费用的汇总。首先，我要问的是，这封电子邮件是谁发出的？\n\n奥莱特先生：我将基于我们先前在记录中讨论过的相同理由提出异议，并指示证人作答。\n\n阿伦松女士：我们将继续对这里的遮盖提出异议。\n\n问：转到附件，这份费用汇总由顶部电子邮件中的某人——该身份不明的人——提供，对吗？\n\n答：是的。\n\n问：可以说这是 Verdolino 的月度经营报告草稿的起点吗？\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：就那一个具体问题而言，是的。\n\n问：抱歉。您是什么意思？\n\n答：这回答了月度经营报告中的一个问题，而且我现在不记得具体是哪一个问题，但大概是第4、5、6E项。第三方代表债务人支付的资金。这是第一稿。\n\n阿伦松女士：McKenzie，标签19。\n\n证人：您问完了吗？\n\n阿伦松女士：没有。\n\n奥莱特先生：我们是否应将备份文件标记为单独的证物，还是——\n\n阿伦松女士：我通常将其标记为一个证物。\n\n奥莱特先生：好的。\n\n证人：我们会再次将它们放在一起，并删除蓝色页。\n\n（于是，电子邮件链由记录员于本日标记为 Jalbert Exhibit 8，供识别之用。）\n\n问：法庭记录员将向您出示标记为 Jalbert Exhibit 8 的文件。\n\n答：您已经交给她了吗？\n\n阿伦松女士：这是在本案中作为 Docket 120 和文件 120-1 提交的文件。\n\n问：这是我们一直讨论、且您参与编制的月度经营报告申报文件吗？\n\n答：看起来是的。\n\n问：转到申报文件120-1，即单独的一页，对于底部这些项目，您能否大致说明它们是什么？总额反映什么？\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：您指的是$109,827.12吗？\n\n问：是的。\n\n答：我正在试图看是谁作出的付款，但债务人的家庭代表债务人于 February 16th，即提交申请后的第二天，无意中作出了这两笔针对破产申请前金额的付款。因此，出于审慎考虑，在第1部分E项所示的161 thousand dollars中，包含了这109 thousand dollars。因此，我们——律师认为，重要的是以该信息补充月度经营报告，即这实际上是一笔在破产申请前应付、但在破产申请后支付的款项。\n\n问：明白。谢谢。那么，这里的总费用为$161,323，如果我们从中减去无意中支付的总额$109,827，该金额反映什么？\n\n答：该金额反映的是在 February 15th 至 February 28th 期间由第三方代表债务人支付、但并非这两笔付款的付款金额。\n\n问：这是否会反映在我们在 Exhibit Number 7 中看到的生活费用表最终版本中？\n\n答：是的。\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n问：据您所知，该数字中是否还包括其他内容？\n\n答：是的，无意中还包括了其他内容。我们发现，填写表格的人在证券总金额中——无论最终总金额是多少——无意中将 February 10 破产申请前作出的一笔付款包括在 February 15th 至28th 期间的付款中。因此将在下一份经营报告中予以更正。\n\n问：因此，本经营报告中包括了向 Exhibit 8 所列律师事务所作出的两笔无意付款？\n\n答：是的，正确。\n\n问：我们谈到的月度经营生活费用，以及您称将予以更正的另一笔付款，是这样吗？\n\n答：它包括在161中。我们将在编制3月报告时将其剔除——该表格通常的运作方式是，您有当期支付款项和累计支付款项。我们将从累计数额中扣除那笔小额资金，以便今后得出正确数字。\n\n问：那么，可以说 Verdolino and Lowey 就这些无意付款所起的作用，是对月度经营报告中所包括的金额进行复核吗？\n\n答：我们尽力了，但鉴于信息可获得的时间以及必须提交表格的时间，与报表编制人之间出现了沟通失误，将予以纠正。\n\n第134页\n\n问：谁是报表编制人？\n\n答：我无法告诉您。\n\n问：您指的是哪一份报表，这里的这份文件，即月度经营报告、Exhibit 8吗？\n\n答：这个东西（示意）。\n\n问：那么，这里的161这一数字，是指 Exhibit 7 中这份电子表格所反映、并经您和 Verdolino and Lowey 修改后的数额吗？\n\n答：161是 Exhibit 8 最终数字加上109的总和。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 为得出最终数字做了什么工作？\n\n答：我们与律师、Aaron Mitchell 和 Melissa Francis 一同尝试审查——我们没有详细资料，但我们尝试提出问题，并确保类别描述准确，因为这远非最终版本。这——存在一些错误，我们还与律师及其他人一同试图确定C栏中已付款项的金额乘以分配百分比后得出总额的比例。我们与编制人合作，以确保报表中的描述准确。我们尝试确认数字准确。我们未能及时获得信息以做到这一点，但随后我们运用判断，并在与律师协作中审查了分配百分比。\n\n问：查看 Exhibit 7 中这份生活费用表草稿，共有七个项目，对吗？\n\n答：是的。\n\n问：可以说 Verdolino and Lowey 核对了类别名称，以确保其准确反映了这些项目中包含的费用吗？\n\n答：我们尽了最大努力，是的。\n\n问：还有哪些信息会有助于您作出该判断？\n\n答：如果我们能够看到实际收款人和支出情况，可能会有助于我们进行分类。\n\n第136页\n\n问：但您没有收到那些信息？\n\n答：没有——当时没有。\n\n问：您就这些项目收到的信息范围，是否包括在这里这张图表中？\n\n答：截至我们提供所有信息之日——我相信有更新版本，因为这与这里不一致（示意）；而且在我们为本次证言出示信息很久之后，仍在持续进行讨论，因为我们正准备在4月提交——抱歉，提交3月的MOR。\n\n问：我们将转到——我认为是最终版本——但我们谈到了类别、您所说的金额。\n\n证人 C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）：在提交本文件时，您并没有能够核实归入各类别金额的信息。对吗？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：什么信息会有助于您交叉核对这些金额？\n\n答：如我所说，收款人姓名、服务内容说明以及资金金额。\n\n问：百分比分配是什么意思？\n\n答：比如说，本表中的安保费用为 $43,655.44。本文件的起草人及其咨询的任何人，无论是他还是她，确定为 40 percent。经与我们团队及律师团队讨论，我们认为该比例可能应为 one hundred percent，因为唯一的原因是——安保完全与 Kwok先生（郭文贵）及其安全有关。如果不是因为 Kwok先生，妻子、孩子或大院内的其他人就不会需要安保。因此，我们建议作出变更，我认为确实已变更为 a hundred percent。\n\n第138页\n\n问：在修订这些百分比分配时，您是否完全依赖于从 Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）、Aaron Mitchell（艾伦·米切尔）、Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）及该身份未披露人士处获得的信息？\n\n答：第一轮是由该身份未披露人士完成的。在我们从该身份未披露人士处获得该等信息之后，大部分讨论是在我们事务所、我的事务所与律师——律师们之间进行的。还要持续多久？因为如果还要持续一会儿，我现在想去洗手间。我会很快。\n\nARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：我们可以休庭。现在停止记录。\n\n录像员：现在时间为 1:22 p.m.。现停止记录。\n\n（随后短暂休庭；恢复后，电子邮件链于本日由书记员标记为 Jalbert 证物 9，供识别之用。）\n\n第139页\n\n录像员：现在时间为 1:28 p.m.。现恢复记录。您可以继续。\n\n问：我认为您已收到标记为 Jalbert 证物 9 的文件。该文件标有 Bates Kwok 00001684。您认识这份文件吗？\n\n答：认识。\n\n问：翻到附件，据您所知，这是否为 February 15th 至 February 28th 期间生活费用的最终版本？\n\n答：我认为是。\n\n问：我声明，如果您将 $51,495.67 加上 109 thousand——\n\n答：161。\n\n问：那么我们理解一致，这就是最终版本吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：该最终版本是否反映了 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）对一名身份不明人士提供的初稿所作的修改？\n\n答：嗯，当然——正如您从电子邮件中所见，我们提出了建议，但律师显然审阅了文件并协助作出最终决定，而且我确信他们也与债务人核实过。我没有。\n\n第140页\n\n问：那么，逐项说明这五项建议，您为何将餐饮费用提高至 50 percent，或者为何建议将餐饮费用提高至 50 percent？\n\n答：因为有一名丈夫和一名妻子，one hundred percent 除以二就是 50 percent。\n\n问：您是否了解为何初稿在证物 7 中以该种方式分配这些数字？\n\nAULET先生（奥莱特）：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我认为，初始文件的制作人——我记得初始文件的制作人考虑到，债务人的女儿以及可能另外一两个人偶尔会出现，因此我认为他们将部分费用归于那些人。\n\n第141页\n\n答：但是，经与律师协商，我们的看法是，那些人之所以在那里，唯一的原因是他们来探望债务人，因此才会产生该等费用。所以我认为他们应将 50 percent 归于丈夫、50 percent 归于妻子，这就是我们得出 50 percent 的原因。\n\n问：除您刚刚向我描述的内容外，您是否还有其他建议提高至 50 percent 的理由？\n\n答：没有我能记得的。\n\n问：第 2 项为安保，增加至 100，而查看证物 7 中的初稿，该项为 40 percent。您建议将安保提高至 100 的理由是什么？\n\n答：再次说明，存在任何安保的唯一原因都完全是因为债务人。为谨慎起见，我们将该费用，即该费用的 one hundred percent，归于债务人。如果不是嫁给 Kwok先生，妻子很可能不会有安保方面的担忧；而当女儿或其他人有时出行时，他们也需要安保。因此，无论出于何种原因，他们的安保都与债务人有关。我们建议提高至 a hundred percent。该事项在小组中讨论过，所有人均同意 100 percent。\n\n第142页\n\n问：您假定保留安保的主要原因与债务人直接相关，其依据是什么？\n\n答：与 Melissa Francis 和 Aaron Mitchell 的讨论；他们在数次电话中确认，债务人受到骚扰、威胁，并且以其他方式担心自己的生存；而且据我被告知，若家人感到害怕，他们感到害怕是因为他们与父亲的关系。\n\n问：关于您将安保提高至 one hundred 的依据，是否还有您尚未陈述的其他理由？\n\n答：嗯，将费用的 one hundred percent 归于债务人是非常保守的做法——这意味着所有费用——我们本可以保留在 30 percent，并且或许能够提出一个有说服力的论点说明为何可以是 30 percent。我们希望采用——我认为小组作出最终推理的一部分是，由于其安全担忧，以债务人的名义报告全部费用是保守的做法——这就是理由。\n\n第143页\n\n问：谢谢。第 3 项为公用事业费用，提高至 50 percent；我声明，证物 7 中该项为 30 percent，而您给出的解释与餐饮费用相同。是否还有其他——\n\n答：没有，是同样的——同样的——对其中大部分项目而言，是同一主题，只是百分比不同。\n\n问：第 4 项涉及家政服务。我相信 Verdolino and Lowey 建议将修理和维护变更为家政服务？\n\n答：嗯，事实证明，一旦我们能够与某人交谈并获得数字背后的一些信息，我们发现那是那 15 天期间女佣、或多名女佣、或女佣服务或清洁服务的费用，而不是维护费用。因此，这只是如实称呼它的问题。如果我们看到明细，我们本会更及时地了解这一点。\n\n第144页\n\n问：您将分配比例从 30 提高至 50 的理由，可以公平地说与其背后的理由相同——\n\n答：是一名丈夫和一名妻子。您知道，他们代表其他任何人所做的任何清洁工作，唯一的原因是 Kwok夫妇在那里。债务人及其配偶。\n\n问：您在页面底部指出，“依我们意见，最好采取更为保守的做法”。这是您——\n\n答：是。\n\n问：——建议提高分配比例的另一项理由？这是肯定的吗？\n\n第145页\n\n答：是。\n\n问：我确实想谈谈保险费用从 30 percent 变更为 zero percent 一事。\n\nARONSSON女士：我想，Makenzie（麦肯齐），你能把第 14 标签页递给我吗？\n\n答：都完成了吗？\n\n问：是。在我向您出示该文件之前，您是否记得有关保险项目从 30 percent 变更为 zero percent 的信息？\n\n答：是，我记得在我的同事查明事实之后，我与他谈过此事。\n\n问：您记得那次交流的什么内容？\n\n答：嗯，我认为他查明，保险付款——即此处第 9 项中的 that 13 thousand dollars——one hundred percent 与纽约市的 Sherry（谢丽）公寓有关，债务人在该期间并未居住在那里；因此，在有人支付 Sherry 的那些账单的范围内，我认为那是 Sherry 的问题，而非债务人的支出，因为据律师告知我，根据事实，所有人的理解是他——他对该不动产没有权益。因此，他不应在月度经营报告所列费用中占有任何百分比。\n\n第146页\n\n（随后，电子邮件链于本日由书记员标记为 Jalbert 证物 10，供识别之用。）\n\nARONSSON女士：法庭书记员将向您递交标记为 Jalbert 证物 10 的文件。这是一份在本案中制作的文件，Bates 编号为 Kwok 00001691。\n\n问：我理解您并未列于该文件中，但我想讨论其中几个问题。您认识这份文件吗？\n\n答：不认识，但我认识该主题。\n\nHARBACH先生（哈尔巴赫）：给他一分钟时间阅读。\n\n证人：好的。翻到第 2 页，Melissa Francis 指出，“鉴于 MK 不拥有 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）房产，您能否说明下列项目作为其每月费用的适用性？以及这是什么类型的保险？”您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您理解 Francis女士在这里询问什么？\n\n答：由于债务人不拥有 Connecticut 房产，您能否说明下列项目作为其每月费用的适用性；她还在询问这是什么类型的保险。\n\n问：如有，您对她的问题有何看法？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我想正确回答这些问题。\n\n问：您想回答月度报告——\n\n答：我希望我们正确回答了她的问题。我的意思是，这将列入月度报告，但我希望我们正确回答了这些问题。\n\n第148页\n\n问：就实质而言，您对她这里的问题有何看法？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不想试图猜测她当时在想什么。\n\n问：所以您并不了解——Verdolino and Lowey 也不了解她在这里提出的问题？\n\n答：我有我自己的理解。\n\n问：好的。翻到第一页，Flynn先生（弗林）答复道：“没错，他不拥有该房产，但他住在 Connecticut 房屋中，所以所支付的这些费用使他受益。”您是否理解 Flynn先生在这里所说的内容？\n\n答：这就是他所说的理由，即由于他住在那里，他应当——在第 8 个问题所述的月度经营报告中，应有一定程度的该等费用归于他。\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔特）\n2 问：弗林先生（Mr. Flynn）继续说道：“我还有一个\n3 关于保险的问题，\n4 因为这是雪莉公寓（the Sherry）的保险。”你是否明白他在这里所指的是\n5 什么问题\n6 ？\n7 答：是。\n8 问：你能为我解释一下吗？\n9 答：嗯，在第8项——不，\n10 第9项中，原始版本中列有\n11 保险。我们不知道该保险\n12 所保的是什么。坦率地说，我们收到它时，\n13 我们假定它是格林尼治住所（the Greenwich residence）的保险，\n14 即债务人及其配偶实际居住的地方。\n15 后来我们经事实查明，\n16 它实际上是雪莉公寓的保险；并且当\n17 我们发现它是雪莉公寓的保险时，\n18 鉴于债务人不住在那里，\n19 也不拥有该房产，经审阅律师提供的材料，\n20 该项应予删除，\n21 这就是我们所建议的，即将其删除。\n22 问：它最终被删除了吗？\n23 答：是。\n24 问：弗林先生继续说道：“我不——”\n25 “我不确定它是否应被列在这里？”第150页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 我认为他的意思是——“在这一\n3 计算中，但我想听听你的看法，\n4 也想问问克雷格（Craig）。”你是否记得他\n5 征求你的意见？\n6 答：是。\n7 问：你的意见是否与\n8 弗林先生在这里的意见相同——\n9 答：是。\n10 问：你是否记得就此与\n11 弗林先生交谈过？\n12 答：记得。\n13 问：请看该邮件链中最上方的\n14 电子邮件，即第1页，弗林先生问道：\n15 “在此期间就\n16 雪莉公寓支付了多少金额？”你看到了吗？\n17 答：是。\n18 问：你知道该问题的\n19 答案吗？\n20 答：我毫无头绪。而且，我也\n21 不知道他为什么问这个问题。\n22 问：这正是我想问的\n23 问题。为什么——\n24 金额多少会关系到它是否应被\n25 列入月度经营报告？第151页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 答：我不知道。\n3 问：我认为对该\n4 项目的原始分配是——\n5 哈巴赫先生（Mr. Harbach）：就在这里\n6 （指示）。\n7 问：——为13千，并且该数额\n8 反映在第2页。$13,611。除弗朗西斯女士（Ms. Francis）的\n9 电子邮件外，你是否对该信息具有\n10 任何独立了解？\n11 奥莱特先生（Mr. Aulet）：对提问形式提出异议。\n12 答：没有。它来自梅利莎·弗朗西斯（Melissa Francis）。\n13 我不知道她从哪里得到该\n14 数字，也不知道为什么。\n15 问：你是否调查过格林尼治房产的\n16 保险？\n17 答：没有。\n18 问：为什么没有？\n19 答：我们要求在——\n20 具有正确知识的人向我们提供所有\n21 以现金、支票、电汇、\n22 HCH或任何其他方式支付的费用，即在\n23 2月15日至2月28日期间代表\n24 债务人支付的费用。我们没有施加任何——我们没有\n25 要求——我们没有留下任何第152页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 限制。我们只是说向我们提供所有\n3 该等信息。我们收到了一份汇总表。\n4 你看到了；直到我们开始\n5 提问，以了解一些背景情况以及\n6 这些数字背后的内容时，\n7 我们才开始作出评估，\n8 并改变我们认为法律团队和我们认为\n9 适当的处理方式。\n10 继续询问\n11 由哈巴赫先生进行：\n12 问：你刚才说，\n13 最初你和你的团队认为\n14 该13——抱歉，我想你说你\n15 假定$13,611是为\n16 格林尼治房产支付的，因为那是他\n17 居住的地方。我理解得对吗？\n18 答：是，先生。\n19 问：后来有人告诉你，\n20 该13,611实际上是为雪莉公寓支付的，对吗？\n21 答：正确。\n22 问：而在那时，你并未\n23 询问在此期间格林尼治房产\n24 是否实际上支付了任何保险费，你没有问\n25 这个问题？第153页\n\n39（第150—153页）\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 答：没有，我们假定——实际上，\n3 马特（Matt）已确认这是一份在该时间段内\n4 所作全部付款的清单。\n5 因此，我们掌握了完整范围，并不存在另一笔\n6 保险付款；而且，您知道，大多数——\n7 我们许多人都拥有过房屋。根据我自身的\n8 经验性了解，通常\n9 每年支付一次房屋所有人保险费。\n10 通常——对于雪莉公寓，这\n11 13\n12 千美元可能只是为一家价值2.5百万\n13 美元的实体支付的全年款项。他们没有告诉我们那是一笔\n14 付款，所以我没有问。\n15 继续询问\n16 由阿伦松女士（Ms. Aronsson）进行：\n17 问：因此，我认为我们已经涵盖了你就\n18 2月15日至2月28日期间月度经营报告所进行的\n19 工作。我们一直在看该文件。\n20 对吗？\n21 答：是。\n22 问：关于你为编制该文件\n23 所做的工作，你还能想到任何\n24 我们尚未谈及的事情吗？\n25 第154页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 答：就我现在所能想到的，没有。\n3 问：我想你提到你正在\n4 编制下一报告周期的报告？\n5 答：是。\n6 问：你能描述一下你的一般\n7 流程，以及该流程与\n8 2月15日至2月28日期间的报告周期相比有何不同，\n9 如有不同？\n10\n11 答：因此，月度经营报告\n12 基本上是呈报信息，而对于本债务人，\n13 月度经营报告中的两类\n14 信息是，问题E，即在\n15 3月1日至\n16 3月31日这31日期间代表其支付的资金，我们将要——我们将要\n17 查明——我们将取得一份清单。\n18 这次，我们将取得一份清单，以便\n19 我们能够看到有哪些项目，并且能够\n20 就支付了什么与律师进行\n21 更有依据的讨论。该等内容将被\n22 汇总、分类，并列入\n23 附表E；此外，我们正在第155页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 与布朗·鲁德尼克律师事务所（Brown Rudnick）以及\n3 梅利莎·弗朗西斯和亚伦·米切尔（Aaron Mitchell）合作，\n4 以确定专业费用的应计额。所有\n5 专业人士，州方专业人士，\n6 委员会专业人士，债务人\n7 专业人士，正常业务过程——被主张为\n8 正常业务过程的专业人士，每一个人，\n9 因为我们需要记录应计额。因此，\n10 经营报告不仅仅是——经营报告\n11 不仅仅询问在该期间支付了什么。\n12 它询问的是——\n13 新表格询问的是未支付金额为何；而我们\n14 未能及时取得该信息以编制2月份的报告。\n15 因此，我们将在这份3月份报告中补上，\n16 我们将确定2月份的应计额，\n17 并查明3月份的\n18 应计额，然后我们将拥有正确的\n19 信息，并且在之后必须持续\n20 维护这些信息；显然，随着\n21 时间推移，如果事情按照债务人希望的方式发展，\n22 这些费用将获得支付。因此，将会有更多\n23 应计额，随后会有付款；同样的\n24 情况也适用于破产财产专业人士\n25 以及委员会及其专业人士。第156页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 这将是对负债额的滚动结转，\n3 现金将于第1页报告。\n4 这将产生对美国受托人（United States Trustee）的费用负债——\n5 其——其——这是一项费用，\n6 不是佣金。他们的费用——其\n7 完全取决于在月度经营报告\n8 期间的现金支付。\n9 问：你是否预计——撤回该问题。\n10 除了你将从布朗·鲁德尼克、\n11 亚伦·米切尔、梅利莎·弗朗西斯及一名\n12 身份不明者处收到的信息外，\n13 你是否预计将就未来的月度经营报告\n14 开展任何调查？\n15 奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n16 答：我不知道你所称的——我不打算——我们将\n17 从某人那里取得一份报告。该报告\n18 将列明在特定期间内作出的所有\n19 付款。我们将第157页\n\n40（第154—157页）\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 运用我们自身的专业知识并与律师一道\n3 审阅该报告，以确保一切合理。\n4 我们可能会根据电子表格上显示的内容\n5 提出问题，但我不会要求提供\n6 已注销支票、\n7 银行对账单或已支付的发票副本。\n8 因此，不会对此开展调查，\n9 只会进行合理性核查，\n10 或常识性核查，并与律师协商，\n11 以确保我们理解该表上所列内容\n12 以及我们将要报告的内容。\n13 问：因此，实质上，你将依赖于\n14 我们已经谈及的个人向你提供的\n15 汇总数字？\n16 答：再次说明，除非我们会基于\n17 所获得的信息作出一些查询。如果我们\n18 再次看到保险项目，我们将问保险保的是什么。\n19 如果再次出现修理和维护项目，我们将\n20 确认它不是女佣费用。因此，我们将运用\n21 一些常识，并基于我们所看到的内容与\n22 律师协商，但在看到——\n23 之前，我不会知道我们将做什么；而且我希望很快能看到。今天是\n24 什么日子，4月8日？\n25 问：谢谢。好的，简要回到第8号证物，我第158页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 认为该证物是2022年2月15日至\n3 2022年2月28日期间的最终生活费用报告。\n4 我想你提到其中列入了一项错误金额。\n5 你能再次说明你的意思吗？\n6 答：我不记得具体数字\n7 是多少，但在安保项目中，\n8 第9行，所列金额为43\n9 千美元。该43千美元\n10 包括一笔——根据我的记忆，大约为12或14千美元的付款，\n11 该付款于2月10日支付。因此，我们收到\n12 这份原始报告时，并不了解其背后的\n13 情况；而当他们——当他们向我们展示背景情况\n14 和清单时——我们看到了2月10日。\n15 因此，我们意识到，我们犯了与两名专业人士那次\n16 时间问题相反的错误，即第159页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 他们在申请破产后支付了申请破产前的款项。这里，\n3 他们是在申请破产前支付申请破产前的款项，\n4 但该项本应被排除在月度\n5 经营报告之外。这是一项正当收费。\n6 不存在超额支付或任何类似情况。它只是\n7 不应在2月份\n8 月度经营报告中报告。\n9 问：因此，是否可以说，你后来\n10 收到了本报告所列这些项目的\n11 更详细明细？\n12 答：我相信我们收到了一份更详细的——但那是在\n13 很久以后收到的。当时所有事情\n14 都是通过审阅、交谈，以及梅利莎和亚伦与\n15 不同人员交谈、马特与不同人员交谈来完成的。\n16 一切均通过电子邮件和口头方式进行。\n17 直到较后很长时间，我们才获得明细\n18 电子表格，远在该报告提交之后，\n19 事实上，也是在我们提供查阅我们记录之后，\n20 我们才获得——\n21 明细清单；而这正是我们发现\n22 月度经营报告存在问题的时候。这只是因为，\n23 您知道，编制这些材料的人\n24 不习惯这些规则，不习惯哪些内容必须\n25 展示——披露，以及哪些内容不应披露。第160页\n\n1 C. JALBERT\n2 我们尽力向他们提供指导，而他们只是\n3 犯了一个小错误。我们下个月会纠正。\n4 问：谢谢。你可以把它放在一边。\n5 你是否记得收到过美国司法部（U.S. DOJ）人员\n6 就月度经营报告提出的询问？\n7 答：我认为实际上是我先联系他们，\n8 而我先联系他们是——这也是为什么——是——\n9 我不知道是否有人曾经编制过\n10 月度经营报告，这里有人吗？\n11 因此，月度经营报告，截至12月31日或1月31日，\n12 是一份、一份——这两页（指示），\n13 即现在的第8页和第9页，\n14 并且可能还有一页——我原以为\n15 是五页，可能是四页。\n16 我曾在数个案件中提交过这些月度经营报告，\n17 而过去三个月，这一直令我感到非常困扰，即我会——我第161页\n\n41（第158—161页）\n\n1　C. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n2 应当——\n\n月度经营报告一贯就是那样做的。\n\n3 报告，在第一页的底部，\n\n4 如果您正在录入数据，它允许您使用保存功能，\n\n5 以便您可以审阅，但在您\n\n6 点击一个写有“将数据发送至\n\n7 美国受托人网站”的按钮之前，它会保留水印；而当它\n\n8 执行其操作时，\n\n9 它不断返回这额外六\n\n10 页以及这些无稽之谈（指示）。所以我\n\n11 实际上联系了美国受托人办公室（U.S. Trustees Office），询问我们做错了什么。\n\n12 当时是午夜，我们正试图提交这个\n\n13 东西。他说，不，所有人都有同样的问题。\n\n14 我们刚刚终于弄明白，\n\n15 这正是应当发生的情况。所以\n\n16 那时我们开始与他交谈，\n\n17 然后当他看到该报告时，他有我们的电子邮件\n\n18 地址，而我们——他正在寻求\n\n19 对161的支持，我认为那是\n\n20 他所要求的。我现在手头没有，\n\n21 或者即使有，我也没有——我不\n\n22 ——但这是我的记忆，这就是\n\n23 他联系的原因，是为了取得——取得该\n\n24 等等，并取得我认为将来\n\n25 专业费用的应计。\n\n第162页　第164页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 问：我们之前谈过您在第11章个人\n\n3 破产案件中的经验。回顾您\n\n4 在这些案件中的经验，是否有任何——\n\n5 您是否有任何——您能否列举任何案件，\n\n6 在该案件中您见过债务人的惩罚性资产与\n\n7 所列负债之间存在如此巨大的差异？\n\n8 答：没有。在我的个人案件中，\n\n9 373 million dollars 的负债是\n\n10 我所见过的最高数额。\n\n11 ARONSSON女士（Ms. Aronsson）：我们没有\n\n12 其他问题了。\n\n13 AULET先生（Mr. Aulet）：我没有问题。\n\n14 GOLDMAN先生（Mr. Goldman）：我有几个\n\n15 追问。我只会占用几个\n\n16 小时。\n\n17 证人：太好了。你介意我去拿一瓶\n\n18 威士忌吗？\n\n19 GOLDMAN先生：也给我拿一瓶。\n\n20 我是Irve Goldman（厄夫·高盛）——\n\n21 录像员：请您把麦克风给\n\n22 他，好吗？\n\n23 AULET先生：好的。我能否让我们暂时停止记录，\n\n24 这样我可以——\n\n25 HARBACH先生（Mr. Harbach）：当然。\n\n第163页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 问：您是否就月度经营报告以及其中项目的进一步\n\n3 细节进行过电话沟通？\n\n4 答：不是电话。您有当时的所有\n\n5 电子邮件。那非常——我所参与得\n\n6 非常有限。我与他的通话是就我的三个案件提出一个一般性\n\n7 问题，我正试图\n\n8 提交这些。他能够回答我的\n\n9 问题——我的主要问题。之后，\n\n10 当他看到月度经营报告时，\n\n11 他说，嘿，我需要这个，而我们显然会\n\n12 安排提供该等材料。\n\n13 问：那么，是受托人的询问促使Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）\n\n14 要求提供我们已审阅的月度经营Excel中所载项目的额外细节和\n\n15 明细吗？\n\n16 答：不是。我们本来就想这样做。\n\n17 那只是——给了我们更多\n\n18 理由去向他们说，嘿，我们必须\n\n19 着手处理这个。这是我们本来会\n\n20 无论如何都要做的事情。\n\n第164页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 录像员：请把麦克风给\n\n3 他，好吗？\n\n4 AULET先生：好的。我能否让我们暂时停止记录，\n\n5 这样我可以——\n\n6 HARBACH先生：当然。\n\n7 录像员：现在时间是\n\n8 下午1:56，现停止记录。\n\n9 （随后，进行了非记录在案的\n\n10 讨论。）\n\n11 录像员：现在时间是\n\n12 下午1:58。现恢复记录。\n\n13 您可以继续。\n\n14 GOLDMAN先生询问：\n\n15 问：下午好。我是债权人委员会（Creditor’s Committee）的\n\n16 Irve Goldman（厄夫·高盛），来自Pullman and Comley（普尔曼与康利律师事务所）。\n\n17 您提到您获得了破产重整\n\n18 专家认证。是这样吗？\n\n19 答：顾问。\n\n20 问：顾问。担任多久了？\n\n21 答：嗯，实际的认证资格\n\n22 是在1999年获得的，但在1999年，当我获得该\n\n23 资格时，我必须累计超过四\n\n24 千小时，并且当时已从业八年。\n\n25 所以，那是30年前。\n\n42（第162至165页）\n\nPAX-014-042\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 千小时，并且当时已从业八年。\n\n3 所以，那是30年前。\n\n4 问：当您受聘作为第11章案件中的专业人士时，\n\n5 您通常会运用该\n\n6 专业知识吗？\n\n7 答：当然会运用其中一部分，是的。\n\n8 问：您认为债务人财务状况的哪些方面需要\n\n9 重整？\n\n10 AULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n11 答：需要重整，我不\n\n12 明白您的问题。\n\n13 问：嗯，您是一名经认证的\n\n14 破产重整专家。您在第11章案件中的受聘工作中会运用\n\n15 该专业知识。债务人的\n\n16 财务状况中有什么是您认为\n\n17 需要重整的？\n\n18 答：嗯，您知道——\n\n19 AULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n20 问：您认为其需要\n\n21 重整吗？\n\n22 答：不，我不这么认为。\n\n第166页　第168页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 问：您不这么认为？\n\n3 答：绝对不认为。\n\n4 问：那么，您为什么认为他提交了\n\n5 第11章申请？\n\n6 答：嗯，债务人需要\n\n7 重整。我不认为——\n\n8 （随后，手机响起。）\n\n9 证人：哦，很抱歉。\n\n10 那是提醒我在2:00做\n\n11 某事的提醒，但我记不起\n\n12 我应该做什么。\n\n13 只是确认它没有在——当它\n\n14 稍后再次响起并惹恼您时，那是什么？债务人的\n\n15 重整，如果您指的是\n\n16 所提出的问题——在\n\n17 一个普通的第11章商业案件中，有很多事情需要\n\n18 考虑，若要进行真正的\n\n19 重整。您必须\n\n20 重整债务、有担保\n\n21 债务。或许是夹层债务、无担保\n\n22 债务。或许要处理应付款项，各种\n\n23 事项——这里并非如此\n\n24 ——\n\n25 。\n\n第168页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 而且我——我完全遗憾的是，\n\n3 我们是作为财务\n\n4 顾问而非债务人的会计师被聘请的。您在该份\n\n5 聘用动议中所看到的大部分内容，在破产\n\n6 程序中都非常重要。\n\n7 清单、财务状况说明书（SOFAs）、月度经营报告、报税表\n\n8 的编制、债权分析，我\n\n9 不知道我们是否会在其中发挥作用\n\n10 与否。这取决于\n\n11 债权的性质。大多数\n\n12 此类债权将接受法律分析，\n\n13 但可能有一百个理由说明，某个提交债权的人——\n\n14 可能附有\n\n15 会计事项，他们希望我们进行\n\n16 调查。因此，我们并非因为我们认为\n\n17 将会有重整而被聘请。\n\n18 破产是一个程序。大量文件\n\n19 由大量人员\n\n20 处理。这个特定债务人，据我\n\n21 了解，已经超过70\n\n22 岁。他甚至没有\n\n23 电子邮件地址。不知道如何\n\n24 使用计算机。不懂\n\n25 技术。不可能亲自完成\n\n第169页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 问：您刚才描述的是琐碎的\n\n3 会计工作吗？\n\n4 答：我不同意。\n\n5 问：不，您不同意？\n\n6 答：编制财务状况说明书和\n\n7 编制月度经营报告，您认为那都是\n\n8 琐碎的工作吗？\n\n9 问：好吧，我不会就此与您争论。关于本案，\n\n10 您认为有什么事项——\n\n11 如果有的话——需要\n\n12 重整？\n\n13 AULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n14 答：是的，我不知道您\n\n15 想问什么。\n\n16 问：是否有资产需要\n\n17 重整？\n\n18 答：据我所知，唯一的资产是——我想律师称之为\n\n19 诉讼资产之类的东西。\n\n20 问：那么，它们将如何被\n\n21 重整，或者作为重整的一部分？\n\n22 AULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n23 答：您可能问错人了，但如果存在正在进行的\n\n24 诉讼，我想将会有\n\n25 ——\n\n第170页　第172页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 ——您会希望存在和解谈判，\n\n3 可能会有调解，\n\n4 可能会有仲裁。有人将尝试把那些资产\n\n5 变现为现金，用以向债权人付款。\n\n6 我不知道我们是否会在其中发挥作用\n\n7 与否。\n\n8 问：作为您的——\n\n9 受聘范围的一部分，有一个要点\n\n10 写明您将提供\n\n11 协助——\n\n12 法庭记录员：抱歉，\n\n13 律师。我需要更清楚地听到您的声音。\n\n14 问：提供协助以\n\n15 审查债务人的账簿和记录，以查找\n\n16 可能可撤销的交易，例如\n\n17 偏颇清偿和欺诈性转让请求权。\n\n18 您称您没有审阅债务人的任何\n\n19 账簿和记录，对吗？\n\n20 答：目前，到目前为止，是的。\n\n21 问：您要求提供过任何材料吗？\n\n22 答：没有。\n\n23 问：您打算要求吗？\n\n24 答：取决于\n\n25 律师希望我们发挥什么作用，以及债务人\n\n第172页\n\n1 C. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n2 实际上，我收回刚才的话。\n\n3 我看过实际的报税表。有——\n\n4 每一位编制人都必须在其编制的报税表上列明姓名。因此有——\n\n5 至少有人编制过报税表。至于他们还做了什么，我不知道。\n\n6 问：好的，那位\n\n7 会计师叫什么名字？\n\n8 答：我不记得。\n\n9 问：到目前为止，报税表是否已向本案任何一方\n\n10 提供？\n\n11 答：我想我们已经提供了，因为我们有这些材料。它们应当是通过电子邮件\n\n12 收到的。因此，就此而言，我认为它们应当已经被\n\n13 提供了。我认为确实如此，但它们是非常简单的\n\n14 报税表，由——我假定是一名纽约或康涅狄格州会计师\n\n15 编制的。我不知道是谁。\n\n16 问：您只是——您显然\n\n17 看过它，只是现在不记得那位\n\n18 会计师的名字？\n\n19 答：我不——嗯，是的。我甚至不\n\n20 确定我是否看过它。我不知道。\n\n44（第170至173页）\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：如果，当时我们正试图把一切都做好的时候，我们使用了那些材料，是因为我们需要其中的一些信息。Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）就某些律师认为重要的问题向我们推荐了它们，我们去查看了它们；但除了编制人的姓名之外，我本来还会查看其他内容。当时，这并不重要。\n\n问：您是否曾与债务人交谈过？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：何时？\n\n答：星期三，在341听证会上，为了介绍我自己。\n\n问：据您所知，那是您与债务人交谈过的唯一一次吗？\n\n答：我不会说普通话，而他显然不会说英语。因此，我没有和他交谈过。或者说中文。我不确定是哪一种。抱歉。\n\n问：您没有收到申请后预付聘用费，对吗？\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：对。\n\n问：您有把握您的费用会得到支付吗？\n\n答：我不知道自己是否有把握。我希望如此。\n\n问：您认为您的费用将从何种来源支付？\n\n答：将从破产财团支付。据我理解，如果我们会获得支付，那将来自破产财团。我没有考虑过，也没有就任何其他付款来源达成任何协议。\n\n问：您的意思是诉讼请求权或追偿所得吗？\n\n答：我预计，本案中唯一有预付聘用费的人是Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）。其他所有人都会寻求获得支付——即债务人的专业人士或委员会的专业人士，向法院提交申请且法院批准其受聘的专业人士，都会寻求获得资金。我们都将从同一处寻求付款。该来源会是什么，如果它最终会存在的话，我不知道。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：在没有申请后预付聘用费的情况下接手本案时，您依赖了什么信息（如有）而感到放心？\n\n答：我从事这个行业已有35年。我不确定。我不记得曾经获得过申请后预付聘用费，但我的律所与——\n\n（此时，一部手机响起。）\n\n证人：妈的，抱歉。现在关掉了。我们——我们是在马萨诸塞州执业的专业人士，并在特拉华州、纽约州、康涅狄格州、罗得岛州、马萨诸塞州、新罕布什尔州、佛蒙特州和缅因州办理案件。我们在几乎所有这些州代理Chapter 7（第7章）受托人。我们可能代理并为罗得岛州几乎每一位第7章受托人、马萨诸塞州每一位第7章受托人、缅因州的几位受托人以及新罕布什尔州的几位受托人开展工作；我们在甚至不知道案件是否会有任何资金之前，先完成50,000、60,000、70,000或80,000美元工作的情况，并非闻所未闻。这是我们所作的一项投资。现在，我没有在本案中作投资。无论我们产生了什么费用——我不知道数额是多少——我希望我能收回来；但如果收不回来，那么我就会像过去许许多多次那样作出核销。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：再次，我认为您没有回答我的问题。\n\n答：哦，好吧——\n\n问：如果您只依赖于您在破产案件受聘事项中的经验，仅此而已，以此决定在没有申请前或申请后预付聘用费的情况下接手本案，您的意思是这样吗——\n\n答：我不理解您的问题。\n\n问：在没有申请前或申请后预付聘用费的情况下接手本案时，您依赖了什么信息（如有）？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：我与很多很多律师合作，当律师来电询问我们是否有兴趣参与案件时，我就参与该案件。\n\n问：所以，您是依赖于Brown Rudnick请求您参与而接手此事的？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：就这样？\n\n答：是，之后就是破产程序。发生什么就是什么。\n\n问：您在决定——\n\n答：我认为——我认为我知道他资产有限或没有资产，而且我认为我知道他有很多正在进行的诉讼，但是——也许我是个傻瓜，但我只需要向另一个人负责，他让我经营自己的业务，就像他经营自己的业务一样；我的想法是，当一名律师来电并且他有一个案件时，我们就作出回应，因为如果我不回应，也许下次他会打给另一名会计师。因此，我没有做您认为一个正常人为保护自己获得付款而应当做的所有事情。\n\n问：您在决定是否受聘于本案时，完全没有查看该债务人的财务状况吗？\n\n答：我认为没有。\n\n问：您在任何程度上依赖Golden Spring（高盛泉）的财务状况吗？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您在同意受聘于本案之前，没有对Golden Spring进行任何尽职调查吗？\n\n答：我相当确定，在我同意参与本案时，我甚至不知道Golden Spring的存在。\n\n问：Lamp Capital（兰普资本）呢，您是否对Lamp Capital进行过任何调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否询问过这两个实体的财务状况是什么样的？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在参与之前？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在同意接受该项聘用之前，是否有人承诺Golden Hill（金山）或Lamp Capital会向您付款？\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：您是否与Golden Hill的任何代表有过任何沟通？\n\nHARBACH先生：Golden Spring。\n\n问：Golden Spring。\n\n答：我曾与某人通过电子邮件沟通——嗯，首先，Melissa Francis有一个Golden Spring的电子邮件地址。她是债务人的律师。自一开始我就被告知这一点。唯一的其他联系人——\n\n问：她是债务人的律师，还是Golden Spring的律师？\n\n答：债务人。\n\n问：Melissa——\n\n答：Francis。\n\n问：但她有一个Golden Spring的电子邮件地址？\n\n答：对。在他们向我提交的所有这些电子邮件中，她都在其中。\n\n问：据您理解，她是债务人的律师——\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：她以及Brown Rudnick都明确地告诉我，她是债务人的律师，Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）也是如此。Brown Rudnick也是如此。\n\n问：好的。据您所知，他们是否属于聘请日常业务专业人员的申请的一部分？\n\n答：我不知道他们是否会由破产财团支付。我不知道他们——他们——他们提交了什么付款动议。我不——我不代理他们，也没有询问他们。\n\n问：那么回到您是否与Golden Spring有过任何沟通的问题——\n\n答：所以，我的同事Matt Flynn（马特·弗林）曾与Golden Spring的某人有过我认为一两次电话交谈。这里我们看过若干电子邮件，您知道，6、7、8、9，无论多少封，该人并未被确认身份，但我没有与该人交谈。我曾——我在电子邮件往来中，并且我给该人写过一封电子邮件；实际上，在写该电子邮件时，我是把它发给Melissa和Aaron的。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：您知道为何该人的姓名在证物中被涂黑吗？\n\n答：知道。\n\n问：为什么？\n\n答：因为您听过Golden Spring的律师所说的。他们因本案相关问题而担心其雇员的安全。我对此一无所知。我只是在按被告知的去做。我不会披露该姓名。\n\n问：据您理解，是应Golden Spring律师的要求将其涂黑的吗？\n\n答：嗯，我不知道是Golden Spring的律师还是Golden Spring本身。我不知道——我不知道是谁开始这样做的。我只是——事实上，我想我直到前一天才知道——前一天，也许是星期三，我才得知——得知——得知这些文件被涂黑了。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：据您理解，按照债务人的说法，他在申请前的全部生活费用均由Golden Spring支付吗？\n\n答：嗯，是由其他某人支付的。我不能明确地说是由Golden Spring支付的。\n\n问：那么，无论该人或实体——无论该人或实体是谁，载于各项附表中的申请后生活费用，是否与申请前支付的费用一致？\n\n答：我们没有就申请前付款的性质、付款金额或任何事项进行调查。因此，我没有任何——任何比较信息。随着月份推移，我们将形成该等信息；但我认为，个人15天费用的最终——最终数字最终约为28,000或29,000美元，计15天。因此乘以二，即该月为60,000美元，其中三分之二为安保费用。\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：为申请后生活费用提供资金的人或实体是Golden Spring吗？\n\n答：我不知道。这不是问题之一，也没有人主动提供该信息。问题只是说——问题是，申请后是否有第三方代表债务人付款。我们尽力回答了该问题。我们会更正仍然存在的一项错误，但据我所知，该问题没有询问，且他们也没有告诉我们，是谁在作出支付。\n\n问：而您没有问？\n\n答：没有。我不知道这会如何影响——这不在月度经营报告中，因此我认为这不关我的事，这就是我会被告知的。\n\nGOLDMAN先生：我没有进一步问题。\n\nAULET先生：我没有问题。\n\n录像记录员：我可以今天停止记录吗？\n\nGOLDMAN先生：可以。\n\n录像记录员：我们于下午2:18停止记录，Craig Jalbert（克雷格·贾尔伯特）今天的证言至此结束。\n\n（于下午2:18，对该证人的询问结束。）\n\n0 0 0 0\n\n声明\n\n本人特此证明，在首先依法宣誓将如实作证后，本人作出了上述证言。\n\n本人进一步证明，前述笔录是本人在此前所述时间和地点作出的证言的真实、正确笔录。\n\nCRAIG JALBERT\n\n于本________日，在本人面前签署并宣誓。\n\n公证人\n\n证物\n\nJALBERT证物\n\n证物编号　说明　页码\n\n证物1　证词录取通知　10\n\n证物2　电子邮件链　32\n\n证物3　电子邮件链　35\n\n证物4　债务人的申请　47\n\n证物5　官方表格106Sum　93\n\n证物6　全球注释　111\n\n证物7　电子邮件链　129\n\n证物8　电子邮件链　131\n\n证物9　电子邮件链　139\n\n证物10　电子邮件链　147\n\n（证物由法庭记录员保管。）\n\n索引\n\n询问人　页码\n\nARONSSON女士　5\n\nHARBACH先生　100\n\nARONSSON女士　103\n\nHARBACH先生　153\n\nARONSSON女士　154\n\nGOLDMAN先生　165\n\n证明书\n\n纽约州\n\n金斯县\n\n本人，LENA YA LYNCH（莉娜·雅·林奇），纽约州内的公证人，特此证明：\n\n上述载明其接受询问的证人已依法宣誓，且该询问为该证人所作证言的真实记录。\n\n本人进一步证明，本人与本诉讼任何一方不存在血缘或婚姻关系，且本人对本事项的结果不具有任何利益关系。\n\n特此证明，本人已在此签名。\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions　866 299-5127\n\n86:10,22,24　132:20　134:13\n\n161　24350\n\n188:21\n\n103:13　115:4,4,8　135:13,17　140:18　26\n\n120:3,12\n\n1:15,18　2:3,12　119:21　124:25　162:21　28\n\n183:23\n\n0　164:4　166:7,18　132:23\n\n161,323　28th　72:9　129:23\n\n32:16　167:5,18　169:24　133:5　133:12　134:3\n\n英语\n\n35:10　111 -\n187:10　165\n187:21　140:14 152:23\n140:8\n00001684　11:53\n90:21　第16\n132:17　154:21 155:11\n\n147:17\n\n129:3　12 2:18 34:22　17\n119:19,21　159:10\n\n6:9　85:15 159:18　48:22 127:22\n18　29\n183:24\n2:18\n06103　75:21 131:25\n120　19\n131:3　167:11\n2:00\n120-1 131:25　19,488\n125:6,15　2:18\n185:5.8\n\n2:14　132:6　17:5\n1979　3\n1　122b\n125:3,14,19　1983\n17:8　23:23 35:8,12\n\n3:16 10:14,17\n1　124\n6:8　1987\n17:10　96:25 97:4,8,13,24\n17:10 23:22 72:10　129\n187:11　1999\n165:24,24　115:13 116:21\n97:9 113:14,18　12:22 90:25　1:22\n139:21　144:12 187:7\n114:14 118:3　19:8 42:12\n13　1:28\n140:4　3,850 96:5\n132:21 151:14　55:14 103:14　1:56\n165:8　7:5,19 11:2,22\n\n155:17 157:6　126:5 146:19　1:58\n165:12　107:6 144:4,6,14\n187:5　152:7 153:14　94:19,22 95:8\n1 a　145:11 146:4,11\n133:25 147:10\n10　154:11　1 b\n95:11　166:4\n147:15 159:19,23　13,611 152:8　2　第30\n2:4\n187:5,14　153:15,20　2\n23:22 32:14,18　31\n17:10 72:10\n100 2:18 142:15,18　131\n187:12　33:2,4 41:6 97:13　74:24 77:7 121:16\n143:8 187:19　187:13\n139　105:21 142:14　155:17,18 161:18\n\n1:19 2:5,10　14\n19:8 98:7 146:7　148:3 152:8 187:6　161:18\n44:7\n第100　159-18　2.5\n154:13　32\n187:6\n\n6:9　147\n187:14　20\n45:8 186:19　第16:17,22 45:13\n\n187:20　15\n77:6 89:10　2019\n79:18　45:14,17 46:14,15\n\n94.71　97:25 145:4　2020\n79:19\n106合计\n93:14　183:22,24　127:24\n2021　46:19,24 47:8,12\n94:2 187:9　1 deite\n187:20　47:13,18 51:15\n\n132:22 135:18　154\n187:21　1:10 3:5\n2022　69:5 116:2 123:15\n140:17　第15\n63:14 72.9　125:4 159:9,10　123:18 126:13\n109,827 133:7　125:4 129:23　188:19　127:10,18 174:15\n109,827.12 132:13　133:11 134:3　21\n45:8 49:9 84:9　342\n16:16\n10:17 1:11 3:4　140:14 152-23　92:21 107:14　17:13 176:6\n\n10:24　154:21 155:11　22\n43.9　187:7\n11:15,19　。 de re-re　22-50073 1:63:22　36\n95:13 96:2,4,8\n11 1:5 21:2,4　16\n96:18 105:18　第22 3:4　96:16\n32:11 55:3 70:3　126:5　23\n97.8　373\n113:19 164:12\n74:19 81:6,11\n\n[4 - 顾问]\n\nb　95:17,19,24\n61　reite\n187:9　172:24 173:9,19\n\nb\n47:24 48:3 91:4　62\n95:15.16.17　a　173:23 179:2\n96:9,12,1797:13　6:49\n39:10　1:11 3:4\n上午　会计师 21:5\n107:14 108:8　108:8 130:23\n6e　11:15,19 90:21　21:6,7,8\n113:13 117:4　7　aaron 25:17,19,25　会计 22:21\n119:4 130:23　7\n1:18 2:4,9 81:6　26:10 31:4,7 32:9　63:21 168:17\n144:20 187:8　86-25 02-18　56:18 57:3 59:3,4　170:2 172:13\n7:18 138:18\n40　103:12 119:16,21　59:10,18 99:2,7　账户\n69:21,22\n142:16　128:24 129:11　102:11 103:17　应计制 70:20\n159:15,16\n43　133:16 135:14　104:12,16 105:3　156:4,9,17,19\n43,655.44.\n138:16　136:18 141:17　105:13 106:7　163:2\n\n72:11　142:16 144:14　109:24 110:18　应计项目 156:25\n\n187:8　176:18,20,22　112:15 124:2　69:2\n应计\n5　181:22 187:11　129:18 135:23　78:23,25\n已应计\n6:19 7:16 169:2\n70 -　139:8 143:14　79:6\n93:12,15 108:8\nt　176:25　156:3 157:15　准确\n10:6\n117:4 130:23　7006\n2:14　160:16 181:4　136:11,12\n187:9,19　100:20 111:6\n77　182:3　10:2.9\n准确地\n50 6:19 7:14,18　78\n93:19　能力 9:25 10:5　136:24\n118:13 141:9,10　8　能够 53:7 78:6　习惯于 53:9\n141:14 142:7,8,9　79:11 136:13　19:15\n行为\n142:12 144:13　8\n1:10 119:21　138:3 144:25　4:8 188:15\n诉讼\n145:11 176:25\n\n21:3 126:6　120:3 131:16,21　163:11　63:22\n活动\nre0ers　134:7 135:11,18　绝对地 82:6　80:12\n75:13,17 76:2\n505b\n75:5　149:25 150:9　167:3 180:3　实际\n109:17\n第50\n44:6　159:7 161:19,20　丰足 132:20　137:7 165:23\n140:17　181:22 187:12　142.21　173:3\n51.495.67\n122:11\n53　7:16 176:25\n\n17:9　接受 102:23　85:21 140:16\n添加\nrer\n94:22 95:23　850\n2:13　115:23\n访问　增加\n155:25\n\n95:17,19　87\n17:10　119:6 124:16　额外的 163.18\n\n95:24 96:2　第8 3:5 127:24　意外地 125:13　地址 6:6.7.8\n159:5 188:19　账户 37:25　169:4 180:10,19\n6　38:24 52:15 63:19　地址 162:20\n\n7:5 11:2,8,21,22　r　64:17 65:3 66:19　管理 4:6\n97:24 98:7 111:4　hai\n119:21 139:24　72:6 91:6,8 92:11　行政的\n111:8 117:5　140:7 146:20　92:16 147:2　77:17 78:7,10\n119:16,18,21　150:10 159:15　172:20　81:8\n181:22 187:10　161:20 181:22　会计学 17:8　建议 22:20\n60 6:19 7:14 75:11　187:13　会计师 18:16　53:261:11\n75:19 176:25　48:10 82:17\n90　70:22 80:6 168:4　顾问\n183:25　83:22 92:23　169:9,10 172:23　21:5,6 34:7 36:23\n[顾问 - aronsson]\n\n37:7 39:8 40:20　分配额 145:25　121:17 122:12　适用的\n107:11\n\n41:20 43:2 48:9　12:20 38:23\n允许　130:2 148:21,23　申请 48:2,7\n48:21 49:5 70:22　65:2 87:11　151:18 163:11　48:18 49:2 175:21\n165:21,22 168:4　获准 80:12　178:20　181:7 187:8\n顾问 62:4,5　81:20　答复 34:20　适用 53:17,22\n事务 14:6 55:20　允许\n82:15,17　148:25 149:4　103:22\n111:18 112:5　162:4 175:22　177:13 184:12　适用 118:2\n影响\n184:19　89:7 125:3\n修订　8:5.23\n答复　指定 22:13\n宣誓书 48:25　经修订的 125:19　130:20　感谢 35:4\n49.7　修正案 60:7　预期 47:16　方法 22:20\n关联的 42:3　修正案　50:19 52:9 54:16　适当的 73:14\n关联关系\n4:13　55:21 112:6　55:6 59:25 61:19　113:8 114:7 153:9\n165:16\n下午　金额 13:9　61:21 63:25 67:16　70:16\n批准\n代理人 90:291:7,20　81:22 96:5 118:12　76:4.24 79:21　62:10\n获批\n91:21,24　133:8,9 134:17　106:15 157:13,17　64:22\n153:12 166:4\n以前　137:25 138:12　预期的 60:5　四月 1:10 3:4,5\n同意 3:14 59:12　159:11,15 183:17　60:11 62:9 68:15　137:22 159:5\n91:696:16 100:22　金额 51:22　预期 78:16　188:19\n107:13,17　132:19 134:23　任何人 83:24　仲裁 171:4\n已同意 143:8　138:4,9 156:14　145:16　12:11 22:12\n领域\n179:12　分析 68:6 83:4　不再 116:9　22:21\n同意 179:9,25　84:3 87:19 89:18　142:11 164:15　19:4\n领域\n协议 55:13　92:25 95:2 96:19　161:15\n任何人的　170:8\n争辩\n61:8 67:25 78:6　105:9 107:20　41:14\n任何时候　论点 117:21\n91:22 127:23,25　115:18 168:10　69:16\n无论如何　144.6\n175:13　168:14\n已分析　anyway's 70:8　aronsson 2:5 4:18\n128:8\n协议　80:18\n分析　87:6 163:23 164:2　4:18 6:2,12 7:4,13\n128:16,18　82:4　公寓 101:6.9　10:12 11:12 12:9\n继续   40:8  122:20　andersen\n17:9　102:6 114:17　26:20,25 27:13\n飞机 97:15　167:15\n烦扰　115:2,7 146:21　29:18 32:11 34:21\n119:5　8:20 9:11\n答复　150:4　35:6 47:22 48:5\n存活 114.5　9:19,21 24:21　道歉 35:2　83:11 88:13 90:18\n指控 40:24　26:22,24 27:12　56:22 167:9　93:10,17 97:6\n81:5 156:7\n被指控的　28:12 29:11,11,13　显然 28:19　99:22 103:5,6\n指控\n83:18　29:17 36:11 38:17　174:21　111:2 128:22\n联盟 2:3 4:20　53:16,21 54:12　出现 100:20　129:7 130:5 131:2\n6:13 10:23　83:20 88:16　出庭 4:16　131:5,9,23 139:18\n已分配 141:16　101:20 104:18　出庭\n4:12　146:6 147:13\n分配\n117:25　105:16 113:17　适用性　154:17 164:14\n145:11\n分配额　116:8,21 118:2　148:6,15　187:19,20,21\n152:3　119:6 120:5\n\n[安排 - 背面]\n\n163:15\n安排　164:9 170:15,17　23:9 28:8 182:10　164:16 165:3\n\n安排　170:19 171:5　律师 2:3,9,13　166:12,22 170:12\n54:20　178:17,17　14:16 15:6,16　170:22 177:25\n到达\n136:8　指定 74:24　25:8 32:3 40:21　184:24\narthur\n17:9　协助 52:18 86:17　46:23 47:6 98:9　撰写 26:13\n明确阐述 143:22　协助 45:11　98:21,24 99:6,14　27.9\n归因于\n144:2,15　55:18 61:9 73:16　104:24 106:20　权威 75:11\n归因于\n118:17　80:17 82:8 84:23　109:23 142:3　授权 48:7\n141:25 149:24　85:18 86:6 88:21　147:3 178:3,3　48:19 49:3\n归因于\n120:22　112:3 171:12,15　归属 138:4　获授权 4:6\n121:7　协助 15:19　可听见的 8:24　汽车\n归因 142:22　51:9,12 109:14　音频\n3:12,12　115:16,16\n亚洲 2:3 4:20 6:14　112:10,11 113:3　审计\n75:13,18,20　可获得的\n135.2\n10:23　141:4　审计 22:21　137:16 160:22\n撇开   15:22 47:5　关联的 66:20　149:22\n应当　避免 69:16\n67:7 83:17 161:9　117:2　八月 17:10　可避免的\n82:9\n询问 36:8 47:19　协会\n107.9　aulet 2:10 5:3,3,12　83:2 84:13 171:17\n53:23 56:15,21,22　9:6 92:20\n假定　9:17 12:4,6,24　知悉 25:17 30:19\n64:20 110:7　92:24 173:18　13:6 24:20 26:16　88:6 90:8, 10\n151:21 152:19　假定的 150:13　26:23 27:11,13,16　114:24\n172:25 178:6　153:15 154:3　28:7 29:19 34:10　糟糕的 47:11\n请求 13:17,19,20　假设 28:15　37:16 39:5 46:20　168:23,24\n34:14 67:18 98:22　50:23 72:13　57:22 58:18 61:4　极其\n88:4\n101:2,18,21 102:2　118:21　64:14 66:13 77:4　片刻\n82.9\n105:15 148:12,17　假设　78:21 79:22 83:7　b\n149:12 151:4,5　143:10　83:13 84:25 85:8　2:65:21 6:5 7:5\n\n153:5 156:11,12　附上\n69:14　88:3,8,16 91:9　11:2,22 75:13,17\n156:13 162:22　附上的 79:16　92:2 93:5 95:9　76:2 94:17,20,21\n170:23 181:14　168:18　96:10 97:2 98:15　94:23 95:12 96:13\n询问 108:11,17,18　附件 129.9　99:23 101:17　187-2\n113:14 115:13　129:21 130:8　102:8 103:24　婴儿 19:25\n120:4 121:16　140:11　104:13 106:18　照看婴儿 19:10\n122:11 151:14　尝试 120:24　108:21 111:22　学士 17:7\n166:9\n方面　45:13\n出席　112:22 113:24　背面 7:18 11:19\n同意\n37:9　出席 45:14,16　118:4 122:18　13:20 27:6 29:24\n评估 101:14　47:11　126:3 127:7 129:4　34:3 41:5 49:13\n评估\n153:7　出席\n4:11　129:25 130:16　55:12 69:25 71:16\n资产\n78:3　46:14　131:6,11 132:11　82:16 90:25 91:4\n资产\n88:2 94:2　注意\n105:20　133:18 141:18　95:17 103:7\n104:7 111:16　律师 2:17 4:17　148:20 149:7　111:23 112:13\n120:23 128:12　6:12 9:18 13:5　152:11 157:20\n114:4 127:11\n\n[背面 - 要点]\n\n131:7 140:4 159:7　海滩\n122: 14　119:8 121:2　布里奇波特\n1:3\n\n159:21 162: 10　承担\n76:9,9　大的\n34:4, 15, 16　2:143:21\n165: 12 167: 14　承担\n32: 15 140:8　35:20 52:23　简要陈述 90:22\n173:2 181: 15　野兽\n42:18　最大的\n19:4　简要地\n14:21\n背景\n17:2　美丽的\n164:20　账单\n45: 19 72: 12,23　65:24 128:5\n153:6 159:21,22　开始\n4: 16　73:6　带来\n163:24\n余额\n69:20　180: 12　已计费\n67:13,14,16　广泛的\n7:21 22:9\n银行\n37:25 52: 15　代表\n12:23 21:7　账单\n19: 14 55:3　广义地\n109:5\n64:21,24 65:6　21:8 38:21108:11　72:3 122:4 146:24　115: 13 132:8\n69: 18 91:6, 16　108: 15 117:6　活页夹\n69: 14　提出\n40:3,20\n158:7　118: 14,23 130:24　birnbaum\n2: 17　167: 17 168:3, 19\n银行的\n91: 18　132:17 133:12　一点\n14:20 17:2　brown\n2:8 5:4\n破产　144: 10 145: 15　21:25 24:3 46:17　15:2123:10,16\n164:5　152:23 155: 17　139: 16　24:6,8, 18 25:8\n破产\n1:2　184: 11　双周一次\n66:25　26:5,6, 10 30:9\n3 :20 20: 11,22　要求\n182: 16　血液\n188: 15　31:20 32:3 38: 10\n21:13,24 22:6,11　相信\n24:4 45:2,5　蓝色\n131: 13　38: 12 39:2, 16\n32:25 38: 15 39: 19　50: 18 72: 14 99: 19　簿记员　43:23 49:24 56:13\n39:22 44:6,7,7　100:7 144:21　52:16 53:14,18,19　57:4 58:25 59:6\n51:2 64:25 74: 13　160: 12 162:21　53:20,25 66: 19　59: 10,17 64:20\n75:4 77: 15,24　167:4 175:7　账簿\n82:8 84: 12　83: 18 98:25 99:6\n80:4,13 81:2,23　相信\n27: 19　84: 14,18 92: 18　102: 11,17 103: 18\n82: 15 83:23 90:3　属于\n102:23　171:16,20 172:17　103: 18 104: 10, 16\n115:2 168:7,22　119:23 160:7　波士顿\n17:6,6　104: 17 105 :7, 12\n177:17 178:11　属于\n101:15　18:16　106:6 109:24\n基础\n59:9　102:6 103:14　瓶子\n34:25 42:8　112: 14 123 :25\n基于\n27: 16,21　所属\n104:8　164:21　126:7,14 139:7\n28:23 63:5 72:25　ben\n13:5 14:16,21　底部\n49:11　156:2 157: 15\n87: 14 158:5 159:2　24:5　105: 19 132:9　175:17 178:7\n基本的\n129: 16　受益人　145: 19 162:3　181:3,5\n基本上\n37:9　121:25　购买\n101:23　桶\n19:3\n39:11155:13　利益\n124:3　117: 18　21:19 155:14\n依据\n37: 14,21　受益\n149: 18　箱子\n2:14　预算\n61: 10,23\n66:25 69:7,8　最佳\n13 :2 28:9 52:4　大脑\n93:8　61:24 62:2\n73:10 80:11 81:7　56:10 60:9,14　中断\n9:9, 12 85:9　预算编制\n42: 10\n81:8,8 90:7　137:2 145:20　85: 15 139: 19　63:16 86:15\n123:12 143:9,23　184: 13　明细　预算\n42: 13, 13\n145:9　更好\n86:23　160:10　建造\n78:2\nbates\n32: 15 35:9　103:25 171:14　明细　建筑物\n113: 16\n129:2 140:8　超出\n14: 13　163: 19　要点\n55:17 61:7\n147: 17　38: 18 53: 13 116:7　92: 19 112:3\n[要点 - 某些]\n\n114:16 171:10　96:197:198:1　可调用的\n144:5　175:17 176:5\n\n业务 6:7 22:10　99:1 100:1 101:1　称为 5:21 20:18　177:3,6,18,23\n41:21,24,25 42:8　102:1 103:1 104:1　41:8 89:22　178:5,5,23 179:10\n42:11,22 43:3　105:1 106:1 107:1　致电 145:7　179:13 182:12\n167:19 178:21,22　108:1 109:1 110:1　电话 25:11.15　案件 21:2.4 40:16\n184:20　111:1 112:1 113:1　58:24 93:6 143:15　41:25 64:10 90:5\n企业 19:5　114:1 115:1 116:1　178:23,25 181:19　92:8 161 :24\n162:7\n按钮　117:1 118:1 119:1　8:11\n摄像机　163:10 164:11\n117:23\n购买　120:1 121:1 122:1　取消\n158:7　166:7,18 169:14\nC　123:1 124:1 125:1　能力\n18:2　172:6 176:14\n126:1 127:1 128:1　资本 126:8,20　177:17\n2:2 3:1 4:1 5:1,21\nC　129:1 130:1 131:1　179:14,15,25　36:14 37:10\n现金\n6:17:18:19:1　132:1 133:1 134:1　116:3,17 117:9\n汽车　37:19 42:12,13\n10:1 11:1 12:1　135:1 136:1,7　照料 67:6 79:4　61:10 62:12,13,23\n13:1 14:1 15:1　137:1 138:1 139:1　职业生涯 47:12　63:15,15,22 69:9,9\n16:1 17:1 18:1　140:1 141:1 142:1　97:14 117:19\n汽车　69:21 78:18 79:2\n19:1 20:1 21:1　143:1 144:1 145:1　1:6 3:22 6:17\n案件　79:3 86:18 87:13\n22:1 23:1 24:1　146:1 147:1 148:1　15:24 33:21 41:19　121:19,22,24\n25:1 26:1 27:1　149:1 150:1 151:1　41:22,23,24 42:19　152:21 157:5,10\n28:1 29:1 30:1　152:1 153:1 154:1　43:3,4 44:3,13,14　171:6\n31:1 32:1 33:1　155:1 156:1 157:1　48:10 49:15 50:22　抓住 88:25 89:2\n34:1 35:1 36:1　158:1 159:1 160:1　50:23 51:2,5,20　89:14,15 156:16\n37:1 38:1 39:1　161:1 162:1 163:1　52:10 54:17 55:8　7:21\n40:1 41:1 42:1　164:1 165:1 166:1　55:11,1656:10　类别\n43:1 44:1 45:1　167:1 168:1 169:1　118:24 136:2,23\n137:25\n46:1 47:1 48:1　59:7 60:9,14\n49:1 50:1 51:1　170:1 171:1 172:1　61:22 62:9,19　分类\n52:1 53:1 54:1　173:1 174:1 175:1　64:2 66:5 67:4,17　137.9\n55:1 56:1 57:1　176:1 177:1 178:1　68:12,21 69:2　已分类\n58:1 59:1 60:1　179:1 180:1 181:1　70:4,7,9,11 71:5,6　155:24\n61:162:1663:1　182:1 183:1 184:1　71:19 73:11,25　类别\n138:4\n64:1 65:1 66:1　185:1 186:2 188:2　74:2,7,11,19 75:9　89:12\n猫\n67:1 68:1 69:1　188:2　75:14,22 76:22　警告 46:21 83:7\n70:1 71:1 72:1　计算\n69:10　77:21 78:5,25　132:20 142:21\n73:1 74:1,9,10　计算 151:3　79:5 81:6 82:24　警示\n89:3\n75:1 76:1 77:1　日历 72:7　84:7 86:4.25 90:6　26:12 27:10\n抄送\n78:1 79:1 80:1　致电 19:10 31:18　93:20 107:24　单元\n3:10 167:8\n81:1 82:1 83:1　45:18 79:11 102:4　111:5 131:24　手机 176:10\n84:1 85:1 86:1　104:25 163:4.7.9　164:7 167:18,25　蜂窝式 3:8\n87:1 88:1 89:1　166:5,16 170:18　169:8,24 170:9　87:18\n美分\n90:1 91:1 92:1　178:3　172:10,10,13,15　某些 40:17 94:3\n93:1 94:1,17 95:1　172:15 173:12　113:22 174:6\n当然\n22:3　158: 10　客户\n18:25 19: 13　70:23 156:6 157:3\n\n62:20 72:20 84:3　已核查\n64:24　关闭\n70:5　165:18 175:20\n91: 11 102: 14　141:5　关闭\n75:15　共同\n158:25\n106: 19 109:8　支票\n66:20　衣物\n103: 12　沟通 26:9\n112: 10 124:7　中文\n174:22　俱乐部\n122: 13　30: 11 57: 11 99:4\n140:25 166:8　选择\n76:6　代码\n75:480:13,14　99:5\n认证\n17:20　中央情报局\n18: 13　82:15　已沟通\n17:23 18:9　CIRA\n18:7,14,15　Cohn\n2:17　58:16 98:24\n认证　流转\n32:4,8　担保物\n42: 14　沟通\n18: 12　已流转\n88:7　同事\n45:5, 15　30:13\n经认证\n17:23　情形　100:25 129:20　沟通\n18:4,6 165: 19　15:25 33: 13 60:6　146: 14 181: 18　104:19\n166: 15　73: 14 114:8　同事\n13 :7　通信\n证明\n186:4,8　引用\n164:7　30: 18 31:24　65:14,19 180:4\n188:8,13　公民\n65 :6　收集\n13:13 177:9　181: 16\n链条\n32: 17 35: 11　城市\n58:8 146:22　学院\n17:6,6　公司\n89:21\n38:6 103:21 104:9　民事\n11 :2　18:16　169:13\n129: 10 131: 15　主张\n52:20 80: 19　栏目\n136:7　比较性的\n139:23 147:9　80:24 81:3,5,16,21　合并\n72:7　183:19\n151:14 187:6,7,11　168:13,16　来\n50:23 53: 14　比较\n110:6\n187:12,13,14　声称\n125:5　54:2171:1674:18　相比\n110:6\n变更\n146: 11　主张\n52:24 54:8　74:20 169: 14　完整\n69: 18\n已变更\n139:4　81:7,10,12,25 82:5　172:6 173:14　完全地\n74:5\n146:4　82:11,18 88:2　175:9,11　108:3 168:2\n变更\n43 :24　90:2 168:10,14　到来\n19:15　合规\n42:24\n44:10　171:18 175:15　100:23 118:8　复杂\n43:4\n正在变更\n139:3　澄清\n96: 15　167:14　52:23\n144:22 153:8　97:3　舒适\n176:4　复合\n139:2\n章节\n1:5 21:2,3　清晰\n119:20　到来\n34:25　综合\n55:3 70:3 74: 19　清洁\n145:5, 15　62:23 78: 18 142:5　89:6\n81:6,6, 11 86: 10,22　明确\n24: 12 28: 18　162: 10　计算机\n169:5\n86:24,25 115:3,4,8　39: 14 98: 10　Comley\n2:12 5:7　关于\n12:21\n164:4 166:7, 18　101:21　165: 17　关切\n142:25\n167:5,18 169:23　明确地\n56: 18 79:2　评论\n36:21,21　144:11\n176: 17,20,22　141:3　37:8,8,9　得出结论\n185: 10\n指控\n160:5　文书性\n55 :5, 7　评论\n112:25　得出结论\n185:6\n图表\n136: 18　客户\n4:23 5:2　商业\n70:7　结论\n28:20\n137:14 153:3　30:8 34:5,6 35:21　佣金\n157:9　同意\n39: 11\n核查\n73:3 110:18　36:23 37:6 38:3　委员会\n2: 13　同意意见\n37: 12\n134:23 138:8　39:8　5:8 20: 19 21:4,5　38:4\n152:21 158:7,10　62:3 66:23 70:21\n\n[condition - covered]\n\n条件\n9:25　119:18 121:11　控制人\n169: 13　43: 14 62:3,4\n\n公寓\n107: 10　124:5 125:23　谈话\n8: 17　70:21 97:12,18,20\n商议\n158: 10,25　128: 11 134:21　谈话\n3:8　98:12,14 99:19\n有信心\n175:3,5　135:20 154: 19　27: 17 44:5 46:22　100: 17 124:8\n确认\n65 :2　155:2 157: 18　47:6 102: 15,16　135:22 136:5\n86: 10,21 114:4　保守的　转换\n70: 12　141:3 158: 11\n136: 11 158:24　143:25 144:9　副本\n69: 18　169:19 171:14\n172:8　145:21　副本\n8: 14 94:22　172:2,14 180:11\n确认　考虑\n157:22　100:21 158:7　180:14,24 181:4\n20:17　167:20　版权\n120:4,6　182:19\n已确认\n70: 12　考虑　律师的\n182: 16\n115:5 143:14　141:22　公司\n74:10　罪名项\n118: 15\n154:4　一致\n183:13　公司\n74:7　国家\n42:6\n冲突\n24: 12　选民群体　公司\n74:7　国家\n42:22\n混淆\n69: 17　21: 11, 13　74:9, 10 75:23　县\n188:4\n国会\n19: 18　咨询\n98: 17　正确\n58: 19　一对\n60: 14 92:7\n推测\n122: 19　126:2 142:3　62:17 63:10 72:13　99:21 110: 13\n康涅狄格州\n1 :2　已咨询\n64:21　76:23 94:25 95:25　147:20 164: 18\n2:14,18 3:2117:5　138:18,18　97:23 102:25　176:23,23\n76:13,14,19　咨询\n88:21　107:25 108:25　过程\n30:21\n113:20 148:5,14　联系\n25 :3 30: 19　109:2 114:12　52: 19 56: 16 62:8\n149:17 173:19　180: 13　121: 12 134:8,19　70:24 156:7,8\n176: 15　已联系\n23 :6,8　149: 15 152:20　169:22 181:7\n联系\n11:5　联系人\n25:4　153:21156:19　课程\n17: 15\n15:6 24: 19 33:21　载有\n59:22　171:20 174:25　法院\n1:2 3:20 4:4\n34:8 36:4,9,25　71: 14 107:21　175:2 180:21　5:10,19 6:15,25\n39:2,18 43:2,25　136:24 163:19　186:9　8:1110:13 13:10\n46:3,10,18 50:14　主张\n28:3　已更正\n134:4　32: 12 35:6 40: 12\n50:25 51:6,20　内容\n101:8　134: 12　45:3 47:22 55:2\n57: 16 60:2 61: 15　有争议的\n6:23　正确地\n148:22　62: 10 78:9 87: 12\n61: 19 63:9 64: 12　背景\n20: 12 22:6　149:4　93: 10 101: 10\n66:1168:15 73:19　继续\n3:1374:8　成本\n117:2,25　111:2 128 :22\n76:25 78: 17 80:21　74:16 130:6　118:10,13,18　131:19 147:13\n83:5,19 84:14,19　持续\n16: 16　141:25 142:6,22　171:13 175:21,22\n84:23 85:21 86:2　103:4 153:10　142:23 144:3　187: 15\n87:20 88: 15 89: 19　154: 16　145:3　涵盖\n16:25 107:3\n92: 15 96:20 97: 11　继续\n68:21　成本高昂\n89:6　128:13\n97: 16 98:6,22　150:2,24　成本\n144:4　已涵盖\n13: 11\n103:8 104:7 106:3　持续\n17: 17　律师\n4: 10 5:4,7　76:20 83:14 85:19\n107:23 109: 11　137:20　9:12,2113:6,15　89:8 103:9 119:17\n110: 11 112:21　25:21,24 30:3　154: 18\n\n[cpe - description]\n\n17:15,16\nCPE　147:11　120:22 121:7　扣除 79:21\n\nCraig 1:14 3:17 6:5　日期为 127:24　122:8,17 124:18　延期 78:3\n48:25 151:4 185:7　女儿 141:23　125:3,5,12,18　延期处理\nી રેરે ને તે\n186:15　143:2　126:23 130:25　定义\n82:19\n161:25\n疯狂　David 2:64:21　132:17 133:13　定义 72:5\n创建\n72:23 157:6　100:4 103:9　141:5 142:5,21,23　101:5\n86:13\n已创建　日 39:9 44:24　143:5,12,15 144:3　学位 17:7 18:16\n133:22　45:14,16 46:24　145:18 147:2　45:13 179:5\n创作者\n141:19,20　47:8 51:13,14,15　148:13 150:14.18　18:19\n学位\n债权人\n42:15　52:4,4 63:16　152:24 155:15　特拉华州 176:14\n47:14 81:5,13,16　132:18 155:17　156:6,23 167:6　14:19\n延迟\n债权人的 2:13 5:8　169:21 182:22,23　168:5,25 169:19　部门 19:22\n165:17　185:2 186:19　171:16 172:2,14　19:22 20:7 22:2\n债权人 20:19,19　188:19　172:19 174:12.19　64:23\n21:9 67:2 86:16　日   14:25 72:11　178:14 180:11,14　取决于 52:11\n86:23 171:6　75:12,19,21 82:17　180:16,24 181:4　视情况而定 42:8\n52:7\n危机　82:21 83:22 92:23　183:3 184:11　51:23 78:24 79:4\n138.8\n交叉　145:4 183:22,24　债务人的 38:23　158:19\n交叉核对　截止日期 81:10,13　47:25 48:18 49:2　取决于 78:18\n136:22　处理\n80:6　58:9,11,13 62:4,18　168:12 171:25\n累计的 69:7　167:22,23,24\n债务　63:4 74:20 79:8　描绘 136:24\n134:17,18　债务人    1:7 5:5　79:20 87:15,25　证言 1:14\n88:14\n好奇　16:9,13,15,20,23　106:15 108:10,19　3:12,17,23 6:22,25\n88:17\n当前　20:11 21:5,6　108:22 111:16　7:6 10:16,24\n118:20　25:16,22 36:15　123:20 141:23　11:22 13:4,21\n目前 18:21　37:11,20,25 38:3,9　144:10 164:9　14:23 15:7,17\n88:7 122:9 134:16　38:22 39:15 42:16　166:9,19 167:15　16:5,10,11 27:25\n171:21　45:13 52:14,25　171:20 172:16　28:20 41:12 45:23\n155:6,10\n周期　54:19,25 57:10,10　175:19 187:8　49:21 137:20\nD　57:12 58:16 62:15　债务人 20:18 42:4　187.5\nて\n81:14 109:22　70:22,22 76:6,8,12　48:6　证言\n40:14\n128:3 186:2　76:21 77:3 78:19　十二月 74:24　42:9\n存款\n187:17　79:23,25 80:4　77:7 161:18　描述 46:17\n162:5,7\n数据　82:8 84:12,14　103:10\n决定　58:20 155:8\n日期\n1:10,16 10:18　88:23 94:4 101:8　决定 37:12　已描述 70:14\n32:19 35:13 44:20　101:11,16 108:16　39:12 87:14　103:21 104:10\n48:4 67:19,20　111:18 113:18　102:13 141:4　128:5 136:2\n71:4 75:12 86:3　114:3 115:15,21　声明 62:19　142:10 169:25\n87:20 93:15 111:9　116:5,6,10,12　已声明 40:18　描述 114:7\n129:12 131:17　117:7 118:5,14,16　可扣除的 78:2　138:11 187:4\n137:15 139:25　118:24 120:15,16　79:2,7\n\n[descriptions - due]\n\n描述　70: 16,25 91 :6,8　106:10,21126:11　109:7, 12 129:5,8\n\n136:10　92: 11, 15　139:13 143:13　182:25\n指定\n12:2,7　直接\n29: 10, 16　155:22 165: 10　狗\n103: 13\n指定　105:20 130:2　讨论\n43: 13　狗\n89:12\n165:23,25　指示\n28: 10　43: 15 106:5　正在做\n7: 18 22: 18\n细节\n145:8　88:23 182:3　113:11137:21　51:8 60:2 61: 19\n160: 19,23　直接地\n104: 15　已驳回\n70: 12　61:2178:1788:17\n详细的\n27: 15　143:11　差异\n164:8　91:16 157:17\n160:10,13　董事\n51 :4,4　已显示\n161:4　162: 13 176:6\n细节\n135:24　不同意\n81: 17, 19　争议\n28:3 29: 19　182:13\n163:6,18　170:3,4　29:20 130:6　司法部\n161: 10\n确定　已支付\n155: 16　不同的\n74:5, 14　美元\n154:14\n38:5 39:3, 12　支付\n62:9　分配\n136:8　美元\n96:5\n87:17 101:10　72:5 117:17　136:14 138:13　125: 15 126:8\n137:5　支付　分配　132:21,22 133:23\n确定\n87: 13　52: 17 54:4, 15, 16　139:6　133:24 146:20\n156:3　54:24 63: 16,20　地区\n1 :2 3 :20　154: 12 159: 16, 16\n已确定\n72:25　67:2 68:22 73:2　划分\n141: 13　159: 18 164: 12\n确定　77:14 86:19 91:14　部门\n1 :3 3 :21　177:2 183 :24,25\n178: 15　91: 15 92: 15 137:8　案卷\n48: 10　双重\n73:2\n发展\n67:5　157: 10 184: 16　93: 19 97:7 100:20　110: 18 134:23\n已发展\n183:20　免责声明　111:6 131:24　怀疑\n114:20\n发展中\n87:24　111: 15　文件\n10:20　草案\n88:7 98: 14\n发展\n86:7　披露\n46:21　32:14,15 33:3　107:23 114: 19,20\n差异\n38:8　83:9,16　35:9, 16 48:6, 12, 15　126:13 130:15\n41:23 108:6　已披露\n84:6　48:23,24 55:12　136:17 140:24\n不同\n41:21　161:4,5　93:18,21 94:11　141: 16 142: 15\n42:18 51:22 52:2　披露\n29:7　96:25 100:20　已起草\n31: 19\n77:21 80:5 108:2　118:22 182: 14　101: 19 105: 19　43:11,16 112:25\n108:3,16 144:18　披露\n68 :25　107:21 109:4　起草人\n13 8: 17\n不同的\n51 :22　证据开示\n40: 13　111:5, 11 112:9,21　起草\n31 :22\nDiFilippo\n2:22 4:2　谨慎的\n89:4　127: 18 128:25　46:2,5 98: 13\n数字\n110:15,15　讨论\n8: 13　131 :24,25 135: 10　103:10 105:22\n数字化的\n120: 19　147: 19　140:9 141:21　112: 11 124:5\n勤勉\n179:8　已讨论\n85 :23　146:10 147:16,19　草案\n32:4 62:21\n蘸\n14:9 28:24　94:5 98:20 106: 19　147:21 154:22　驾驶\n161:24\n54:20 61:22 62: 14　127: 15 130:4　155:3　172:13,14\n63:19,23 64:2,4,10　143:7　文件\n13:9　丢弃\n41:10\n64:16 65:3,11,15　讨论\n132:3　13: 13,16,17,23　到期\n44:23 45:7\n65: 19,22,24 66:3,6　讨论\n11: 17　27:22 57:8,15,16　55:3 69: 11 70: 19\n66: 15 68:2,20　15:24 99: 15　57:20 105:11　75:7 81:22 179:8\n\n会费\n107:10　实施\n63:20　约定 23:5　实质上\n61:2\n\n5:22 186:5\n正式地　91:14　23:7 24:2,10,19　158:14\n188:10　高效的\n23:8　25:6 26:4,11　62.2\n确立\n职责 41:20 43:2　高效地 52:5　30:12,14 31:16,22　81:21 156:17\n43:20,21 50:24　八\n166:3　32:5 34:9 36:5,9　已确立的 74:13\n55:691:25 93:4　任一 42:17 81:5　40:5 43:12 44:2　遗产 42:20 53:4\ne　101:9 103:16　45:2 46:3,5 50:15　54:21 62:25 68:25\n2:2,2 5:21 6:5\ne　104:22 110:17　51:25 52:2 55:15　70:24 73:17 74:3\n经过\n39:11　55:16 84:15,19　74:14.14.18.21.23\n13:11,23 14:2,4　选择 74:25 75:2,13　171:10 180:2　74:23 76:9,10,14\n15:20 26:9,13,13　75:18　约定事项　77:20,24 78:19\n27:9,10 30:19　选举\n19:18　166:17 177:16　79:24 80:4,7,8,10\n32:17 34:3 35:11　电力\n107:11　英语 127:13　81:23 83:3 94:22\n35:19 37:18 38:6　15:19\n电子的　174:21　107:6 113:19.22\n39:7.9 41:17　电子设备\n100:24　确保 73:12　114:4 147:6 157:2\n49:22 59:11 81:14　119:17　136:23　175:9,11 181:10\n99:19 104:23,24　消除\n131:13　整个 79:14,14,18　遗产的\n87:25\n106:9 112:24　150.21　完全地 79:6　遗产\n74:4\n117:5 129:9,10,15　已消除\n150:20　138:23 139:6　估计 105:21\n129:17,24 130:11　150:22　157:10 172:9　估计的 71:13\n131:15 132:22　强调地　实体 42:3　106:12\n139:23 141:2　181:2 183:7　179:19　73:11\n估计数\n147:9 151 : 13　经验性的 154:9　题为 1:16 48:6　估算 73:7\n152:9 155:16,25　雇用 14:8 38:21　实体 74:5 103:15　97:14\n等等\n160:18 162:19　48:8,19 49:3　114:24 119:25　120:5\n163:8 169:4　90:11,17 168:6　126:22 154:14　评估\n114:13\n173:15 180:8,10　受雇 18:21　183:10,10 184:4　68:2\n事件\n180:19,22 181:21　36:15 37:11,20　条目\n148:7,16　103:21\n事件\n181:25 182:2,4　38:9,11,16 90:14　衡平的 113:15　104:10\n186:2 187:2,6,7,11　91:25　错误的 125:23　所有人 60:21\n187:12,13,14,17　雇员\n28:17　159:11　75:9 93:7 156:8\n188:2,2　雇员 28:22　错误地\n125:5　175:18\n较早 68:10 94:5　29:2,5 42:5,23　125:14　所有人的 45:2\n100:7　50:20 182:11　错误　69:8\n容易 73:2　就业 38:14　161:7 184:13　每个人的 46:2\n编辑\n135:15,16　89:7,8　136:4\n错误　147:3 162:15\n140:23　努力 124:10　91:7,20,21\n托管　证据 87:11\n受过教育的\n155:22　183:23\n结束　91:22,24　恰好 53:7 58:9\n教育 17:18　从事 20:11,15　Esq. 2:5,6,6,10,15　115:4 117:4\n教育的 17:3　20:16 24:23 166:6　2:19　130:22 159:13\n有效地\n38:4　179:10　181.25\n\n审查\n5:25　预期　27:21\n暴露　恐惧 28:5,6\n\n100:2 103:4　106:22　范围 22:12 60:5　可行性\n86:8\n153:10 154:16　33:5,13\n预期的　65:4 78:3 83:8　87:3,7,9\n165:14 185:9　123:20　113:6 137:12　可行的 87:16\n187:18 188:9,11　136:18\n费用　143:17,18 146:23　二月 45:8\n已审查 5:24　ી રેજેઃ 8　100:21\n额外的　63:14 69:3 72:9,9\n101:3\n示例　费用\n71:13　110:15 162:10　77:6 122:22 125:4\n109:3 163:20\nExcel　72:4 77:15,17,18　f　129:22 132:17\n169:2\n超额　78:23,25 79:7　し　133:11,12,25\n交换\n181:25　105:22 106:12,16　81:14 109:17,18\n188.2　134:3 140:14,14\n160:4\n排除的　106:23,23 107:2,3　fa\n41:19　152:22,23 154:21\n不包括 125:21　107:9,15 108:10　面孔\n102:24　154:21 155:10,11\n11:10\n原谅　108: 15,20,23　事实\n115:25 182:21　156:15,17 159:9,9\n51:14 123:16　117:6 123:2　15:24 60:5\n事实　159:19,23 160:7\n126:12 137:22　124:11 129:22　99:10,13 113:9　联邦 11:2 19:17\n153:14 174:23　130:9 133:5,15　114:8 146:15　19:18 73:17 76:12\n证物 7:7 10:14　134:10 136:24　147.4　79:14.16.18\n10:17 32:14,18,21　140:13 147:7　事实上 150:15　费用 73:13 123:3\n35:8,12 41:6 43:6　148:7,16 149:17　公平\n42:25 53:16　157:7,8,9\n47:24 48:3 91:4　149:24 152:21　59:20,23 60:22　感觉 48:11 67:3\n93:12,14 111:4,8　183:4,11,12,22　72:16 78:15 84:21　感觉\n41:18\n128:24 129:11　184:5　88:24 94:19 96:9　142:2 178:22\n131:7,16,21　经验 7:21　97:19 103:20　费用 33:18 53:9\n133:16 134:7　20:24,25 64:4,7　104:6 106:13　54:24 62:6 68:2\n135:11,14,18　82:3 164:4,6　130:13 134:20　69:8,11 70:21\n136:18 139:24　177:16　136:21 145:12　72:24 77:18,25\n140:7 141:17　专家 22:19,19　160:9　156:4,24 163:3\n142:15 144:14　40:11,19 41:2　44:8\n相当地　175:4,8\n147:10,15 159:7　91:12 165:20　熟悉的 7:23　132:24\n感到\n182:6 187:3,3,5,6　166:16　12:10 89:21　受托人 20:17\n187:7,8,9,10,11,12　专业知识\n166:6,17　家庭 19:15 58:8　数字 136:5\n187:13,14　届满\n69:15　103:13 118:9　155:19\n证物\n187:3, 15　解释\n36:24　129:8 132:16　推算 160:23\n存在\n101:23　41:22 70:2 82:13　143:18　162:16\n179:12　108:5 132:8 148:6　远\n6:21 67:14　提交 29:5 38:15,20\n存在 57:7　150:8 159:12　171:21 173:12　40:11 52:25 53:3\n143:17　已解释 37:15　139:17\n快速　74:8,16 75:6 76:6\n172.7\n存在　解释　父亲 118:18　76:11,11,16 77:23\n预期 51:7.19　144:15　143:20　78:14 81:5,7,16,20\n175:16　明确的 66:2　过错 73:8　89:6 137:22\n163:11 175:21\n\n[已提交 - Francis（弗朗西斯）]\n\n已提交 3:19 13:9　179:6,18　62:23 87:13\n流动　112:22 113:24\n\n28:24 42:7,8,9　4:8\n在财务上　流动的\n104:20　118:4 122:18\n45:3 48:10 49:7　87:16　13:730:18\nFlynn（弗林）　125:3,14,16 126:3\n55:22 62:19 63:14　融资 14:10　45:6,16 49:15,16　127:7 130:16\n68:12 69:23 75:8　28:25 54:20　50:5 56:4,24　132:11 133:18,22\n75:24 76:5 84:4　查找   40:10 117:25　112:17 129:18,19　134:15 135:3\n93:19 100:10　156:18　149:15,19 150:2　141:18 148:20\n111:5 122:22　完成\n8:19　150:24 151:11,14　149:7 152:11\n125:4.14.18　已完成 54:11　181:18　156:13 157:20\n131:24 135:3　4:3,5 21:24\n公司　Flynn's（弗林的）46:10 50:7　166:12,22 170:12\n160:21 161:23　22:13 24:16 39:18　151:8　170:22 177:25\n167:4 168:16　40:3,25 51:5　44:20\n聚焦的　187:9\n181:12　52:15 56:2,15　46:6\n聚焦　表格\n98:16\n80:10\n文件　112:15 139:14,14　108:18　提出\n101:7 112:13\n提交 32:24 61:11　156:2 172:13　15:15 25:6\n各位　188:10\n63:12 73:23 75:12　176:9　29:24 30:10,14　向前 63:17\n82:17 92:23 96:9　公司 62:7 134:7　49:14,24 129:21　68:17 69:6 75:14\n96:12 98:23　第一 5:22 16:18　遵循\n164:18　108:13 134:19\n113:23 132:3,6,18　19:3 21:23 43:16　以下 44:25,25　157:4 163:3\n138:2　43:22 44:6,9,21,24　148:7,15　133:22\n发现\n提交文件 56:7 73:18　45:14,25 46:24　如下 5:24　145:3 146:14,18\n最终\n62:22 87:17　47:8 51:13,14,14　食物\n119:3　150:15,17 182:24\n133:15.24 135:17　51:15 55:17,18　傻瓜\n178:19　四 15:12 19:2.3\n135:21 136:3　69:23 73:9 75:19　前述的 186:8　19:23 21:18 82:23\n137:24 140:12,20　89:3 93:25 94:14　可预见的 124:22　161:22 165:25\n140:22 141:4　105:3 112:3　忘记\n102:19　Foxboro（福克斯伯勒）\n6:9\n144:8 159:8　122:21 129:23　忘了\n11:10　框架 34.75\n183:21,21　130:25 139:10　形式 22:16 34:10　118:23 146:23\n最后\n46:13　149:14 161:13,14　37:16 39:5 54:5　154:5\n162:16　162:3 180:9 186:5　57:22 58:18 62:10　Francis（弗朗西斯）25:18,23\n财务状况 61:12　89:13\n适合　64:14 66:13 72:6　26:2,10 30:2,6,7\n63:12,15　适合的 101:4　72:21 77:4 78:21　31:4,8 32:9 56:17\n财务的   14:5 21:4　五 39:10 128:2　80:25,25 81:2,3　57:3 59:3,5,18\n21:6 22:15 34:7　128:15 141:8　84:25 88:3 91:9　99:2,7 102:11,20\n36:23 37:6 39:8　161:22　92:2 93:5,13 94:2　102:21 103:17\n40:20 41:20 42:25　161:7 184:13\n修正　94:21 95:9 96:10　104:12,15 105:4\n48:9.20 49:4 54:6　口味 17:15　98:13,14,15,19　105.14 106.7\n55:20 62:4,5　楼层\n2:4　102:8 103:24　109:25 112:15\n64:22 111:17　61:10 62:13\n流动　104:13 106:18　124:2 129:19\n112:5 166:10,19　62:13 69:21 86:18　108:21 109:15　135:23 139:8\n168:3 178:14　110:20 111:22　143:13 148:4,12\n\nPAX-014-061\n[Francis（弗朗西斯）- Hampshire（汉普郡）]\n\n152:9,13 156:3　一般的\n88:21　上帝\n47:14　Golden（戈尔登）2:17 5:16\n\n157:16 180:9,18　100:15 155:8　7:18 43:19\n进行　26:18 27:17,18\n坦率地说 33:12　163:9　79:5 101:6 124:18　28:7,10,14,17,23\n150:12　通常 13:25　156:22　29:6 57:23 58:3\n欺诈性的 82:10　18:24 21:19 22:8　正在进行 3:3 10:13　179:6,9,12,24\n82:20 171:18　24:2 25:5 36:24　32:12 35:7,8　180:5,6,7,10,15,20\n自由的 48:11　44:12 50:24 55:2　36:14 37:5,10,19　181:16,20 182:9\n频繁地 39:20　55:14 57:4 66:3　37:24 39:15 40:8　182:15,19,19\n40:2,5 42:15　66:23 70:2 73:8　40:10,10 41:9　183:4,8 184:6\n64:25 73:5　74:24 80:23 82:14　44:9 45:5,20 47:3　Goldman（高盛）2:15 5:6\n前面 15:9 44:18　90:12 109:10　47:23 52:3,12,22　5:66:20 7:10 27:3\n162:23 180:23　110:10 115:6　53:7,13 54:2,3,7,8　28:4 29:8 85:14\n163:24\nfirel　49:23\n获得　54:9 59:2 68:17　164:17,23,24\n完整的\n19:8 73:10　86:23 135:20　68:18,19,21 69:5,6　165:15,16 184:22\n完全地 12:20　137:21 176:4,8　69:24 70:19 73:23　185:3 187:21\n功能\n87:24　179:21　76:8,18,19 77:6,9　高尔夫\n123:4\n基金 2:4 4:20 6:14　Gettr（盖特尔）\n120:21　78:22,23 80:5,15　良好 3:26:10 44:8\n10:24　给予 10:6 14:25　85:8,14 87:2,3　165:16\n资金筹措 127:23　147:24 152:20　89:5 91:18 92:20　货物 100:25\n128:17 184:5　153:2 161:6　92:23 93:8,11　119:16,19\n资金\n70:17　164:25　96:24 106:24　毕业生 18:18,19\n108:12 130:23　给定的 105:14　107:12,18 108:13　毕业 17:4,6\n138:12 155:16　131:22 134:25　111:3 115:4　无偿的 37:7,8\n175:23　182:11 185:6　118:22 123:9,10　伟大的\n164:8\n家具　186:10 188:12　123:13,23 124:12　Greenwich（格林尼治）113:20\n100:25　75:11\n进一步\n163:5　眼镜\n11:11　128:23 129:15,23　152:16 153:16,24\n184:23 186:8　14:6.7\n全球的　131:19 134:19　集团 26:14 113:3\n188:13　51:10,11 111:7,14　139:15,16 143:6　143:7 144:8 153:8\n未来 69:23 78:4　111:24 187:10　147:14 149:2　120:20\ngtv\n78:5,8,12,20 85:3　去\n3:14 7:22 11:12　151:22 155:18,18　猜测 15:8,12 19:3\n86:19 87:13　28:2 38:12,13　155:19,20 156:15　77:5 127:2,3,6\n124:22 157:18　40:13 44:17 53:6　156:16,18 157:22　149:8\ng　54:19 90:18　157:22,24 158:2,6　猜测\n66:8\n5:21　103:25 107:5　158:12,21,23　指导\n161:6\ng\n垃圾 61:3,3,5,6　111:23 114:4　159:3 161:5 163:3　170:24\n家伙\n107:12\n燃气　122:3,20 124:18　163:14 168:21　h\n汽油\n117:9　139:15,16,19　169:16,18 170:25　23:16 187:2\nh\n收集 29:4　144:7 156:21,22　171:5,11 175:10　一半\n93:7\n123:17　164:21 176:25　175:23,25 177:8　Hampshire（汉普郡）176:16\n183:20　181 · 9　176:24\n\n[手 - 增加]\n\n手 27:24 32:12　174:15　希望\n148:25　116:25 117:18\n\n34:22 47:23 93:11　46:15\n听证会　149:3 175:6 177:8　118:9 123:2,5\n110:9 111:3　51:13　医院 122:4　173:13\n117:21 128:23　热\n107:11　59:12\n热的　立即 44:25\n130:22 131:20　持有\n1:17 3:23　114:17\n酒店　损害\n9:25\n146:7 188:19　11:17 23:2 165:10　15:13\n小时　重要的   8:18\n交付 147:14　帮助 24:13 46:7　15:11,11\n小时　75:3 132:24 168:6\n发生 47:13 52:3　57:7 137:4　39:10 67:21　172:11 174:7\n52:12 69:3 89:12　帮助了\n137:9　164:19 166:2　无意的 133:6\n89:13 162:17　有帮助的\n14:14　101:25\n房屋　134:6,22\n发生 80:3　38:25 137:4 138:8　149:17　无意中\n81:15 82:22　帮助 100:9　家庭 97:25　125:12 132:16\n178:11,12　169:11\n帮助　100:24 101:4,15　133:21 134:2\n骚扰 143:15　在此之前　102:5 119:16,19　不适当的\n骚扰 27:21　186:11 188:10　家务\n28:5,6　188:18\n在此签署　144:20,23　包括 22:18\nHarbach（哈尔巴赫）2:6 4:21　163:14,24\n嘿　8:25\n嗯　80:11 94:16\n4:21 23:12 41:13　高 17:3,5 19:10　人类 110:21　107:14 122:15\n59:13 85:16 99:20　19:24 94:14　百 64:9　包括在内的 65:14\n99:25 100:3.5　Hill（希尔）-\n179:24 180:5　138:21 139:4　125:15 132:23\n103:2 147:24　雇用\n80:5　141:13 142:22　133:19 134:2,5,13\n152:5 153:11　已雇用\n90:5　143:6,24 144:2　134:23 137:14\n165:6 180:6　雇用\n40:25　146:20 168:15　150:25 151:25\n187:19,20　历史 17:3　丈夫\n141:12　159:11,17 160:11\n硬 -\n127:12　击中\n162:7　142:8 145:14　包括 19:6\nHaven（黑文）2:18 116:2　击中\n73:7　i　61:23 62:12\n116:15　1:5 2:9 3:18 5:5\nHo（何）　想法 7:19 44:8　包括\n危险 15:8　11:6 94:4 111:18　67:23 90:17　40:14 61:11 70:24\nhch 152:22　持有 18:11,18　126:24 151:20　86:7 115:16\n头部 8:24 155:4　36:14 37:10,19　身份识别　纳入 125:24\n标题 11:22　持有 114:25　10:17 32:19 35:13　收入 52:25 53:3\n健康 121:18,22　家 6:7 107:8,9　48:3 93:15 111:9　53:5 62:15 63:5,9\n121:24 122:2,8　118: 19,25　129:12 131:17　73:17,24 74:16,17\n听见 127:13　房主的　139:25 147:11　74:20 76:15,17,22\n171:14　154:10　已识别 7:12　77:8,11,12 78:8\n听说 45:24 82:21　房主　103:22 104:8　身份 26:18　79:20 87:25 125:5\n104:15 127:15,17　107:7　134:7 181:23　125:16,21\n182:9　住宅 119:5 154:8　身份 26:18　不正确的 125:18\n听证 45:17　诚实地 12:21　27:23 28:16 74:8　增加 141:8\n46:14 47:9 51:15　希望 64:3 100:22　想象 54:18　142:12,17 145:24\n123:18,19 127:18　159:4 171:2　61.75 66.72\n\n[增加的 - 争议事项]\n\n增加的\n142: 14　139:7, 12 145:2　122:2,8 146:4,12　已调查\n\n144: 13　146:10 152:10　146: 19 148:8,17　101:22 110: 11,24\n增加\n\n141: 10　153:3 155:13,14　150:3,4, 11, 12, 16　调查\n40:7\n\n143:23 145: 10　156:20 157: 14　150: 17 152: 15　40:9,22 59: 16\n产生\n\n142:6　158:20 174:4　153:24 154:7,10　63:8 95:7 97:22\n177:7　176:3 177:22　158:21,22　102:9 108:24\n独立\n\n63:8　183:19,19 184:9　知识产权\n120:7　115:6,18 119:14\n\n95:6 97:21114:10　获悉\n44:2　120:13,15,18　119:22 128:11\n\n119: 13 122:5　99:13 103:16,18　意图\n171:24　157: 18 158:9\n\n123: 19 128:7　103: 19 104: 16　意图中的\n32:25　179:15 183:15\n\n152: 10　180: 11　34: 19 40:4,6 62:7　调查\n表明\n\n7:2　告知\n127:5　89: 15 110:20　114:11\n\n表明\n135: 12　初始\n\n140:23　125:19　投资\n177:4\n\n137: 18 152:6　141:20,21　互动\n16:23　177:6\n\n161:19 162:11　启动\n25: 12　发票\n158:8\n\n个人\n21:8　输入\n43 :21 59:6　互动\n146: 17　涉及\n20:7\n\n24:15 41:2,19,23　72:22 114:22　互动\n15:2　31:2149:15,17,20\n\n43:4 70:4 74:3,4,6　输入\n162:4　利益\n20:22　50:2152:2453:4\n\n74: 15, 15, 16, 17　询问\n153 :23　53: 11 77:20 80:3　55:24 56:6,20\n\n75:23 77:2, 19　查询\n51: 16　87:12 113:16　57:24 59:7 65: 10\n\n164:4,11 183:23　查询\n161:9　119: 10 120:7,18　65: 18 90:9 100:8\n\n个人的\n27:20　163:16　121: 16 147:5　101:13 105:22\n\n个别地\n79:24　内幕人士\n82: 19　感兴趣\n4:9　109:6,9 132:4\n\n个人\n19:5　无力偿债\n17:24　22:15 41:17 49:10　178:7 179:21\n42: 19 57:8 85:5　18:5,6 19:4 21:24　151:3 178:4　参与\n115:9\n\n158: 16　165: 19 166: 16　188: 16　iPhone\n103:11\n\n行业\n60:17,21　实例\n62:3 89:9　利益\n101: 11　不论\n70: 19\n\n告知\n124:3　138: 15　115:13　美国国税局\n76:19 89:10\n\n信息\n12:20　实例\n40: 19　干扰\n3:1110:5　Irv\n2:15 5:6\n\n22: 16 24: 16 29:3　164:6　干扰\n3:9　164:24 165:16\n\n29:7 30:22,24　机构\n64:23　内部\n25:6　岛\n176: 15,21\n\n31:3,9,12 58:10　被指示\n43 :7,9　80: 14　签发\n27:23 73 :6\n\n59:6,16 69:24　指示\n26:21　内部地\n13:10　75:10 82:23\n\n85:7 94:4 98: 11　26:23 27:12　口译员\n127: 14　124:23,23 150:5\n\n99:11,17 104:11　指示\n29: 10　相互关联\n113 :7　签发\n54:7\n\n105:3,7, 12 110:6　教员\n18:5　中断\n41:8　问题\n18:3 27:24\n\n116:9 124:10,14　指示\n9:21　介绍\n174: 16　40:24 44:8 52:6\n\n124: 16,20 127:5　不足\n8:25　调查\n102: 14　53:15 72:3 110:11\n\n133:2 135:2　保险\n69: 14　105:17 110:25　147:20 174:6\n136:13 137:3,12　107:8 117: 10　113: 10 124: 17　182:12\n137: 19 138:3,7　121: 17,18,22,24　168: 19\n\n项目 55:5 61:16.20　36:1 37:1 38:1　149:1 150:1 151:1　键盘录入\n98:19\n\n63:11,18 64:13　39:1 40:1 41:1　152:1 153:1 154:1　键盘录入的 98:16\n66:12 68:6,16　42:1 43:1 44:1　155:1 156:1 157:1　儿童\n118:15\n73:15,20 80:16,21　45:1 46:1 47:1,24　158:1 159:1 160:1　138:25\n82:7 83:6.19　48:1,2,11,25 49:1　161:1 162:1 163:1　种类 20:22 88:24\n84:11,24 85:18,22　50:1 51:1 52:1　164:1 165:1 166:1　116:17 118:17\n86:2,6 87:7,21　53:1 54:1 55:1　167:1 168:1 169:1　122:12 134:22\n88:15,20 89:19　56:1 57:1 58:1　170:1 171:1 172:1　Kings\n188:4\n91:5 92:19 94:14　59:1 60:1 61:1　173:1 174:1 175:1　45:20 105:6\n知道\n94:15,16 95:4,7,23　62:163:164:1　176:1 177:1 178:1　113:9 178:16,18\n95:24 96:2 97:11　65:1 66:1 67:1　179:1 180:1 181:1　182:22\n97:13 103:11,12　68:1 69:1 70:1　182:1 183:1 184:1　知道 7:16 9:10\n103:13,14 104:2,2　71:172:173:1　185:1,7 186:15　22:4 30:12 31:7\n111:20 113:17　74:1 75:1 76:1　187:3　31:17 33:19 34:13\n127:22 142:14　77:1 78:1 79:1　1:6\nJam　34:18 36:7 38:16\n144:12,20 146:12　80:1 81:1 82:1　一月 161:18　38:16,22 39:13\n152:4　83:1 84:1 85:1　13:8 31:25\nJo　41:4 43:18 47:3\n\n项目\n89:16 96:21　86:1 87:1 88:1　49:16 50:9 56:5　50:3 52:3,21,22\n97:24,24,25 98:7　89:1 90:1 91:1　56:24 112:17　53:9 57:23 58:2.3\n99:12 101:3,12,15　92:1 93:1,12,14,22　86:13\n共同　58:12 60:4,9,25\n102:5,22 103:22　94:195:196:1　2:22\nJon　62:21 64:9 65:16\n107:13 119:16,18　97:1 98:1 99:1　Jonathan（乔纳森） 4:2　66:3,5,23,24 67:6\n119:23 121:8,11　100:1 101:1 102:1　法官 29:9,13　72:19,23 76:7,17\n132:7 136:19,25　103:1 104:1 105:1　87:16　77:7,10,12,13\n137:13 160:11　106:1 107:1 108:1　法官们 22:14　79:10,12,13 80:14\n163:6,19　109:1 110:1 111:1　判决书 37:22　83:23 84:5,10\n我　111:4,8 112:1　102:4 136:15　86:14 89:9,11,20\n2:10,15 5:21 6:5　113:1 114:1 115:1　六月\n17:9　89:25 90:4 103:25\n1:15 3:1,18\nJalbert（贾尔伯特）　116:1 117:1 118:1　司法 64:23　104:3,4 107:10\n4:1 5:1 6:1,5,14　119:1 120:1 121:1　证明正当\n148:15　109:19 111:24\n7:18:19:1 10:1　122:1 123:1 124:1　K　115:3 116:3,3,4,5\n10:14,16,19 11:1　125:1 126:1 127:1　保留   41:2 52:16　116:5,14,17 117:8\n12:1 13:1 14:1　128:1,24 129:1,11　59:14 107:12　117:8,10,20 118:7\n15:1 16:1 17:1　129:14 130:1　124:17　120:21 121:13\n18:11 19:1 20:1　131:1,16,20 132:1　保留 42:11　122:23,24 123:3\n21:1 22:1 23:1　133:1 134:1 135:1　Keith（基思）\n20:6　125:8,13,20\n24:1 25:1 26:1　136:1 137:1 138:1　9:17 13:6\nKen（肯）　126:20 127:12\n27:1 28:1 29:1　139:1,24 140:1,7　14:16,21,24　145:15 150:11\n30:1 31:1 32:1,13　141:1 142:1 143:1　Kenneth（肯尼斯） 2:10 5:3　151:18,21 152:2\n32:18 33:1 34:1　144:1 145:1 146:1　保留 7:17 162:10　152:13 154:7\n34:23 35:1,8,12　147:1,10,15 148:1　157:21 159:3,21\n\n[知道 - LLP 的]\n\n161:2,15 166:21　Lago（拉戈）\n122:13 124:4　合法\n160:5　清算\n171:5\n\n168:11 169:4,5,17　124:21　Lenaya（莱纳娅） 1:19 4:5　已清算 88:2\n170:13 171:7　Lamp（兰普） 126:8,20　188:6,21　清单 7:17 53:6\n172:16,19 173:7　127:16,20 179:14　贷款人 20:20 21:7　64:22 87:6 90:4\n173:20,25 175:5　179:15,24　58:24\n冗长　107:4 154:4\n176:2 177:3,7　土地\n113:16　31:16,22\n信函　155:19,20 157:24\n179:11 181:8,9,11　语言 114:23　32:5 43:12 75:13　159:23 172:7\n181:22 182:5,12　大型 30:20 59:8　76:3　173:4\n182:18,20,21　78:5　水平 53:12 72:25　列出 12:3 72:19\n184:7,18　2:5 4:18\nLaura（劳拉）　94:14 149:23　108:12 111:25\n知情地 29:4　6:12 103:3,6　水平 59:5　114:14 122:12\n知情 12:15　法律 22:13 39:18　负债 30:23　128:3\n12:19 41:3 59:9　112:15 134:7　94:3 111:17　听\n124:7\n62:17 63:3.4　43:18 46:8\n律师　164:10,12　听取 123:15\n91:10 102:10　86:20 102:17　责任 157:5,6　列名\n108:13\n121:15 122:7　113:25 138:20　169:23\n生命　160:23\n123:17,20,22　139:14 178:23　可能性\n82:4　诉讼\n19:6\n126:9 127:20　律师的\n40:7　限制 111:15　22:4,7,11,11 40:6\n128:7,21 133:20　律师 22:20　有限的 5:17 90:7　77:981:25 82:5\n140:12 152:10,20　25:12,14,1639:21　163:9 178:17　85:19 88:2 127:23\n154:9 158:3　51:17 82:18 95:5　行   5:13 44:18,18　128:15,17 170:19\n172:21 174:18　96:23 102:7 110:8　61:15,20 63:11,18　170:25 175:14\n184:15　125:17 126:2　64:12 66:12 68:5　178:18\n47:14\n知道　128:6 132:24　68:16 73:15,19　少量\n14:19 16:25\nKwok（郭文贵）\n1:5 2:9 3:19　136:16 139:14　80:16,21 82:7　21:25 24:3 46:17\n5:5 11:6 25:21,24　150:20 155:23　83:6,19 84:11,24　89:12,12\n32:1635:9 94:4　158.3 159.7　85:17,22 86:2,6　146:22 150:18\n居住\n102:6,23 103:14　170:18 172:22　87:7,21 88:15,20　118:15\n生活\n104:9 111:18　174:6　89:16,19 91:5　149:16,22\n119:24 122:16　૨૫ - ૨\nead　92:19 94:14,16,22　生活 114:8\n129:2 138:23　学习\n30:5,7　95:3,7,13,15 96:2　129:22 133:15\n139:2 140:8 143:2　离开\n152:24,25　96:16,21 97:11　134:9 136:17\n147:17　离开 41:11　99:12 103:12,13　140:13 153:17\nKwok 的\n30:3　102:7 144:4\n剩余　111:19 132:7　159:8 183:3,11,12\n119:10 145:17　法律 2:22 101:8　136:19,25 137:13　184.5\nL　105:9 106:6　146:12 152:4　2:12 75:24\nLle\n5:21 6:5 23:16　113:15 114:7,25　159:14,15 163:6　126:21\n186:2　153:8　163:19　1:18 2:3,4,8\nLLP\n63:5\nack　合法地 76:2　行 95:19 104:4　3:24\n女士\n119:7,10　168:14　126:18　LLP 的 10:24\n\n[贷款 - 马萨诸塞]\n\n贷款\n63:23 64:2　Lowey（洛伊）\n1: 15 7:9　Lynch（林奇）\n1: 19 4:5　主要\n19:3 67:2\n\n65: 11, 15, 19,22,25　10:25 13:24 15:16　188:6,21　89:15\n66:6, 15 68:2　17: 12 18:22,25　M　Makenzie（麦肯齐）\n2:6 4:24\n70:16　20:6,10,15 21:16　Macdonald（麦克唐纳）\n49: 19　34:21 146:7\n贷款\n64:5,10 66:3　21:2122:24 23:6　女佣\n118:8 145:4　作出\n73: 11\n位于\n3:24 101:5　23: 18,25 24: 17　145:4 158:24　101: 14 102:3\n113: 19　25:7 26:3 30: 13　女佣\n145:4　113:3 153:7\n地点\n123 :21　31:15 36:8,18　167: 13 184: 10, 16\n提出\n101: 17　37:3,24 38:21　邮件\n26:9, 13, 13　经理\n50:8, 13\n长期\n15:5 137: 18　39:4,17 43:7 48:8　30: 19 32: 17 34:3　经理\n50: 16\n139: 15 160:20　48:20 49:4,18　35: 11, 19 37: 18　51: 19\n165:22　50:2, 15,20 56: 19　38:6 39:7,9 41: 17　管理\n51:4\n看\n31:25 35:15　57:2 58: 15,21　104:24 106:9　70:16\n40:8 48: 11 82: 16　59:15,25 61:15,19　129:9, 10, 15, 17,24　普通话\n57: 18\n111:23 152:15　64:12 65:9,13　130: 11 131: 15　174:20\n174:7 178:13　66: 10 67: 13,24　139:23 141:2　三月\n122: 13 124:4\n看过\n13 :22 70:7　71:12,18 72:17　147:9 151:13　124:21\n133:16 136:14　73:19 76:10,25　152:9 160: 18　三月\n23:22 45:8\n163:21173:22,25　78: 16 80:20 82:4　162: 19 169:4　72: 10, 10 73 :6\n174:8 181:21　83:5 84:17,22　173:15 180:10,19　122:25 134: 15\n寻找\n14:3 22: 14　85:25 87:20,23　181:25 182:2,4　137:22 155:17,18\n22:16 69:17　93:3 94:6,10 95:3　187:6, 7, 11, 12, 13　156: 16,18\n136:17 142:15　96:20 97:10,16　187: 14　Mark（马克）\n7:6 35:7\n154:22 162:20　98:6 99:5 100:8　邮件\n13:11,23　131:9\n172:4 175: 18,23　101: 13 102:3　14:2,4 15:20 27:9　标记\n10: 16\n175:24　109:6, 11 112: 16　27: 10 49:22 59: 11　32:13,18 35:12\n看起来\n107:5 132:5　112: 17,20 122: 15　99: 19 104:23　47:24 48:2 93:12\n松散\n132:7　124:9 125:22　112:24 163:8　93:14 111:4,8\n失去\n75: 19　128: 10 135:20　180:8,22 181:21　128:24 129: 11\n损失\n78: 12　136:22 144:21　主要\n2:13 25:2,3　131:7, 16,20\n许多\n42:1047:11　149:11163:17　163:12　139:24 140:7\n68:18 69:24　Lowey 的\n12: 15,22　缅因州\n176: 17,23　147: 10,15\n104:25 112:13,14　44: 13 55: 15 67:9　维持\n17:25　显著地\n41 :20\n122:3 127:8　106:3 111:20　54:3 91:7 92: 10　标记\n10:13\n168:23,24 178: 18　112:8 134:21　维持　婚姻\n188: 15\n许多\n99:13,14　135: 16 140:23　156:21　已婚\n142:25\n106:21113:10　Ip\n4:20　维持\n63: 19　Mary（玛丽）\n13:8 31:24\n167: 19 169:21　午餐\n123:4　64: 16 91:5　49: 16 56:4,24\n178:2,2　奢侈\n115: 16,23　维护　112: 17\nLow\n53:12　116: 13　107:8 144:22　马萨诸塞州\n6:9\n145:6 158:23　176: 13,16,22\n\n[实现 - 每月]\n\n实现 52:7　会议 16:16,17　会见 6:11 16:13,18　Mitchell（米切尔） 25:17,20\n\n实现 60:12　45:14.15 46:16.25　16:19 30:18 58:15　25:25 26:10 31:4\n材料 150:19　47:13 51:15 69:5　125:15.16　31:8 32:9 56:18\nMatt（马特） 45:6,15 46:9　116:2 123:15　方法 152:22　57:4 59:4,4,18\n49:15,15 50:4,7　126:13 127:10　方法论　99:3.8 102:11\n56:24 112:17　会议 46:19　111:15　103:17 104:12,16\n129:18,19 154:4　47:12　167.23\n夹层　105:4,13 106:7\n160:17 181:18　Melissa（梅利莎） 25:18,23　麦克风 3:11　109:24 112:15\n事项 1:16 3:18　26:2,10 30:2,6　165:2　124:2 129:18\n6:23 20:8 41:9　31:4,8 32:9 56:16　麦克风 3:6　135:23 139:8\n43:8 46:4 49:17　56:17 57:3 59:3,4　中间 113:14　143:14 156:3\n50:21 51:6 53:12　59:10,17 99:2,7　162:14\n午夜　157:16 181:5\n67:13 76:5 81:25　102:11,18 103:17　百万\n126:8　148:4\nM K\n90:9 115:25 129:2　104:11,15 105:4　154:13 164:12　时刻 62:24\n145:6 147:17　105:13 106:7　Miltenberger（米尔滕伯格） 2:19　153:12\n151:23 160:25　109:25 110:18　5:14,16 28:13,14　变现\n120:24\n174:10 188:17　112:15 124:2　29:23 41:7,15　54:21\n金钱\n事项 7:2 14:2　129:19 135:23　Miltenberger 的　62:14 78:4 134:18\n40:2 88:22 98:20　139:8 143:13　29:21　153:24 177:4\nMatthew（马修）\n13:7 56:4　148:3 152:12　头脑 27:14 34:18　款项\n136:6\nMedonald\n15:18　156:2 157:16　34:24 36:20 87:5　监控\n92:14\nMcKenzie（麦肯齐）\n131:2　160:16 174:5　99:20 164:21　监控 91:13\n141:9,10\n餐食　180:9,17 182:3　Mindy（明迪）\n20:9　月\n72:15\n144:15　55:7\n成员　46:8\n我的　118:21 161:7\n意思是 17:16 21:9　172:12　最低限度 32:8　184:2\n39:24 44:23 60:14　成员资格　67:7 77:14 128:6　每月 45:6\n83:12 86:8 87:9　122:13,17 124:5　161 · 7\n轻微　46:11 51:12 67:8\n96:11 110:4　记忆\n113:12　分钟 11:13 33:3　68:7,11,18,23 69:7\n116:14 130:19　记忆 66:2,9　147:24　69:10,12 70:2,15\n138:14 149:2　115:22 127:8,9　14:20\n分钟　70:18 71:2,3,8,13\n175:14 177:19　141:20 159:17　89:11　72:3,20 105:21\n意指 8:3 82:14　琐碎工作 170:2,7　89.14\n细节　106:12,16 107:14\n144:3 151:2　提及 14:15　误传　107:22,25 108:20\n意思是 22:7 63:12　15:15 18:4 19:24　135:4　116:22 117:14,16\n159:12　22:23 24:11 25:23　错过\n23:11　118:11 122:16,21\n媒体 3:16 120:19　29:25 49:14,19　缺失 32:281:9　123:7 124:6,11\n120:23,24　54:14 57:3,14　110:15　125:5,16 130:14\n171:3\n调解　60:13 73:22 87:8　159:24\n错误　130:21 132:2,25\n药物 10:4　92:4 100:7 126:16　误解　134:9,24 135:10\n会见 16:15 45:22　165:18　56:22　147:8 148:7,16,24\n72:5　149:3,24 151:25\n\nPAX-014-068\n[每月 - 异议]\n\n154:20 155:12,15　116:4 138:10　115:25 116:15　136:12 141:17\n\n157:11,19 160:4,8　173:4.8.23 174:9　146:22 156:13　145:2 153:6\n160:24 161:11,16　182:6, 14　173:18 176:14,16　158:15\n161:17,23 162:2　被指名\n119:7　176:23 188:3,7　众多 44:5\n163:5,13,20 168:9　136:22\n姓名　夜晚\n14:22　59:11 101:3\n169:7,11 184:19　107:12\n自然　没有“l”字母\n78:7　112:24\n月 72:7　性质 52:21　无稽之谈 162:11　5:16\n纽约\n161:25 183:20　168:13 183:16　8:17 77:19\n正常　0\n莫尔 72:11 108:14　136:3\n几乎　179:3　23:16 78:11\n137:22　必然地 83:24　通常地 109:15　0\n186:2\n莫尔的 170:6　必要的 12:20　公证人 1:19 5:23\n上午 3:3 6:10　63:21 75:25 80:18　186:22 188:6　O’Melveny（欧麦律师事务所） 1:17\n14:20,22　85:18 93:2 100:23　注释 3:5 29:20　2:3 3:24 4:19,22\n4:25 6:13 13:18\n抵押贷款 77:19　112:7 169:21　35:24 41:11　100:5 103:7\n母亲\n118:17　需要 8:23 9:9　145:19　宣誓\n4:77:25\n动议\n14:9 28:25　36:14 37:11,20　29:18\n已注明　129:25\n38:15,20 89:7　40:12,15,23 42:10　14:6,7,7\n注释　反对\n90:10,16 168:6　47:4 85:9 124:19　51:10,11 100:9,13　提出反对 30:20\n80:19\n动议\n6:24　127:4 143:3 156:9　100:14.19 101:3　反对中\n异议 12:4,24\n181:12　163:14 166:20,23　111:7,14,24　24:20 26:16 27:15\n机动车 119:5　169:18 170:10,15　112:12 113:4　28:24 29:22 34:10\n摩托车　171:14　121:6 148:4　37:16 39:5 57:22\n115:17　需要 30:22,25　187:10　58:18 61:4 64:14\n75:14\n移动　44:2 46:7 174:4　通知 6:22,25 7:5　66:13 77:4 78:21\n移动中 34:24 57:2　需要中 166:10,13　7:12 10:15,24　79:22 81:10,12\n多重 42:22,22　需要 167:6　89:10 187:5\n多个 19:14　169:19　通知中 4:17　84:25 88:3,8 91:9\n92:2 93:5 95:9\n42:4 76:4　已谈判\n31:14　十一月 127:24　96:10 98:15 99:24\n相乘 136:7　31:15　数目 3:22 6:24　101:18 102:8\n乘以 183:25　谈判\n31:18　19:16 30:21 32:16　103:24 104:13\n音乐\n120:7,18　65:10　62:6 73:4 81:4,15　106:18 108:21\n1:18 2:3\nMyers（迈尔斯）　谈判 171:3　93:19 96:8 100:20　111:22 112:22\n3:24 4:19,22,25　均不 58:14　110:19,20 132:22　113:24 118:4\n6:13　净额   19:10,24 78:11　133:16,20 134:19　122:18 126:3\nn　荷兰\n114:17　135:13,18 146:20　127:7 130:16\n2:278:11 186:2　115:2　150:9,10 152:14　132:11 133:18\nn\n187:17　从未 57:6 121:23　159:14,15 181:21　141:18 148:20\n名称 4:2 6:3,11　1:18,18,21 2:5\n新的　183:22 187:4　149:7 152:11\n20:5 23:12,13,15　2:5,10,10,183:25　编号 97:7　157:20 166:12,22\n23:16 27:20 28:22　3:25 5:23 58:8　数字 48:23　170:12,22 177:25\n29:5 58:12 102:18　79:15,16 115:8,10　97:5 135:21\n\n［异议—段落］\n\n异议 4:14　108:20,23 137:20　口头 65:18 99:17　页 7:8 11:8,21\n\n12:8 14:10 52:20　170:24 178:18　99:18　33:2,4 48:22,23,24\n52:22 54:8　开放 47:13 91:7　口头地 106:9　49:9,11 55:13,18\n反对 9:18　92:10　160:18　88:20 93:25 95:18\n义务 91:22　开庭陈述 63:19　命令   29:15 62:11　96:4,25 97:4,8\n观察员 45:20　64:16 91:5　72:23 75:3,5,8　105:18,20 106:11\n12:19\n取得　经营 41:21　86:9,21 105:5　113:13,14 115:12\n已取得 59:17　41:24,25 42:11,20　已命令\n54:25　119:9,12,20 120:3\n22:15\n取得　42:21 43:3 45:7　通常地 172:5　121:3 124:25\n显然 43:18　46:11 51:12 67:8　普通的 30:21　126:5,10 132:7\n66:18 87:17 98:17　68:7,11,19,23　62:7 70:24 156:7　140:19 145:20\n105:8 156:21　69:10,12 70:3,6,10　156:8 167:18　148:3 149:15\n163:15 173:21　70:15,18 71:2,4,8　169:22 181:7　151:14 152:8\n场合\n174:17　71:13 72:4,21　原始的\n150:10　157:6 161:19.20\n偶尔　78:12 106:12,16　152:3 159:20　161:20 162:3\n141:22,24　107:22 108:2　最初\n153:13　187:3,18\n113:19\n占用　116:22 117:14,16　4.9\n结果　页数 161:19,22\n113:22　118:11 122:16,22　188:16　162:11\n68:3\n发生　123:8 124:6　外部 16:22 26:3　已支付 32:24 70:23\n提议\n18:25　130:15,21 132:2　26:5,6,14 31:5　72:14 73:13 77:25\n办公室\n19:16 58:8　132:25 134:4,5,9　80:4 126:10　86:16 108:10,15\n68:24 69:20 72:12　134:24 135:11　127:17　118:22 130:24\n72:22 162:13　147:8 149:25　未偿还 59:24　133:3 134:16\n办公室\n1:17　151:25 154:20　多付款　136:7 149:18\n官方的 93:13,25　155:12,15 156:10　160:6　151:15 152:21\n94:21 187:9　157:11,19 160:5,8　81:18,19,20\n应付　153:24 155:23\n抵销 78:7　160:25 161:11,16　拥有\n114:3　156:11 158:8\n45:10 160:24\n哦　161:17,23 162:2　126:22,25 127:16　159:19 160:2,3\n167:9 173:2　163:5,13,20 168:9　154:8　173:6 175:4,8,10\n177:14　169:7,12 184:19　所有权\n102:12　175:19 179:24\n好的 9:7 35:17,22　运营 127:20　107:9　181:10,12 183:4,6\n71:17 85:17 96:3　意见 145:20　115:5 116:5\n拥有　183:8,14\n103:2 131:11　151:5.7　p　棕榈\n122:14\n148:2 149:14　机会 2:4　2:2,2 23:16\np　平底锅\n101:23\n159:6 173:8 181:6　4:20 6:14 10:24　P&L 69:20　168:23\n文件\n旧的\n169:3　38:20 75:20 81:4　1:15 2:17\nP.C.　文件 43:17,19\n曾经 85:11 144:24　反对 29:6　下午 39:10 90:25　44:16 45:3 46:3,6\n154:10　被反对 74:6　139:21 140:4　126:14\n若干 60:9 69:23　103:14　165:8,12 185:5,8　段落\n113:2\n持续进行的 52:6　相反的\n159:24　Pacific（太平洋） 2:3 4:19　113:2\n88:14 105:21　6:13 10:23\n\n［最高—计划］\n\n最高\n29:3　通过\n44:9 130:25　人员\n5: 15 16:2　139:9, 11, 12\n\n地块\n111 :25　139: 10　19:8,17,19 28:19　140:24 157: 17\n父母\n42:3　已通过\n105:7,8　45:22 53:4 58:24　178:20 179:3\n部分\n21:22 37: 17　专利\n120:4, 13　102: 17 117:24　181:23,24 182:2\n43:17 51:1169:9　Pax（帕克斯）\n100:6　118:7 141:24　183:9,10 184:4\n96:9,12,17 97:9,13　支付\n19: 13 54:22　142:2,4 168:24　个人的\n27:23\n97:24 100: 12　55:3 68:2 118:20　175:16　182:5\n105:20 111:25　154:9 171:6　百分比\n118: 13　个人\n95: 12\n112:3 132:21　应付的\n69:21　138: 19,21 139:4　97:25 101:4\n144:7 170:21　应付款\n167:24　141:9,11,13,14　102:10\n171:7,9 172:4　收款人\n138: 11　142:7,8,9, 12,16,23　亲自\n23 :9\n181:6　收款人\n137:7　143:6,8 144:2,5,6　65:17\n参与\n47:2　支付中\n107: 17　144: 13,14 145: 11　视角\n31 :23\n47:17 60:8,12　146:24　146:4,5,11,11,21　77:16 85:7\n参加\n51: 13　付款\n33: 17　百分率\n136:6　有关\n146:21\n58:23 84:3　92:22 106:23　136:8 138: 13　申请\n32:22\n参与　108:22 117:9　139:5 147:7　33:5,9, 16,20 35:24\n45:21　133 :3,25 134: 11　百分率　36:3,8 74: 13 84:6\n参与　146: 19 154:7,13　136: 15 144: 19　92:22 132: 19\n45: 12 47: 10,20　154: 15 156:24　履行\n59: 15　133:3,3,25 160:2,2\n特定的\n40:5, 12　159:17 175:13　66:1191:2593:3　160:3,3 172:5,20\n40: 16 42: 19 105:5　179:4　96:20 97: 10,16,21　174:25 176:5,8\n117: 17 118:6,23　付款\n83 :22　98:5,6 114: 13　177: 18,24 183:4\n130:17 168:25　84:6 86:16 93:2　125:22　183:11,14,16\n尤其\n14:9　132: 16,19 133:7,9　已履行\n80:20　184:5,12\n112: 12　133:10 134:2,6,16　83:5 88: 10 89: 18　电话\n15:3 25: 11\n当事人\n3: 14 66 :22　134:22 154:5　97:20 121: 10,14　25: 15 28:8 47:20\n84:23 87:12　156:25 157:24　期间\n72: 10　58:24 59:2, 11\n104:25 105:2　172:5 183:17,17　82: 16 86:20 90:25　104:24 143:15\n117:6 130:24　184: 11　117: 18 129:22　167:8 181:19\n133: 12 188: 14　工资单\n42:7　133:11140:13　电话\n3:10\n合伙人\n19: 12　支付\n122:4　151: 15 153 :25　短语\n110:2\n20:3 51:3　个人计算机\n10:25 48:9,20　154:20 155: 11, 17　身体上\n123:5\n合伙企业\n74: 10　49:4　156: 12 157:25　挑选\n3:7\n75:23　PDF 95:18　159:9　地点\n3:10,14\n部分\n79: 12　Pearl（珀尔）\n2:18　伪证\n8:8　45:22 47:15 53:8\n当事方\n4:7 20:22　罚则\n8:8　人员\n5:12,15　77:6 82:20 83 :25\n44:4 53: 10 99: 11　未决期间\n70:9　15:18,2126:15,17　175:24 186: 11\n102: 14 119:24　117: 19　49:20 50:17 51:5　计划\n86:6, 11, 13,24\n122:6 173: 12　待决\n9: 11　54:4 103: 15　87: 15,24 122:2\n184: 10　81:25 82:5　129: 18 130: 10,10　169:17\n\n已计划 54:19　120:17　准备\n13:4　先前 6:10\n\n计划 86:14 88:7　可能\n118:3　24:13,14 71:11,12　14-23 85-20\n125:3　169:6 171:17　71:23 95:3 100:9　104:10 119:18\n平台\n120:8　邮寄 20:17 32:22　173.5　130:4\n120:20　33:5,9,16,20 35:24　已准备 13:10,14　主要的\n143:10\n播放 52:10 169:18　36:3,8 61:11　24:15 31:19 71:3　本金 21:17\n169:20 171:7　63:12 133:3 160:2　71:19 86:12　22:24 23:3 37:23\n172:2,3,3　174:25 176:5,8　161:15 173:18　50:5,10,16,25 51:8\n播放 52:11　177:18,24 183:11　183:12　打印的 119:11\n诉状 14:8　184:5, 12　制备人 135:4,6　82:17 83:23\n先前\n请 3:5,9 4:15　已发布 120:8,19　136:9 173:4 174:9　优先权\n81:7\n5:10,19 6:3 8:19　潜在的 24:10　准备中 8:12　隐私\n29:2\n9:5,11 11:8 23:14　52:9 65:11,15,22　15:6 45:6,11,12　私人的\n3:7\n28:11 33:2 35:15　85:21　46:14 55:24 56:7　特权 39:23,25\n67:22 148:5,14　潜在地 27:20　57:24 58:21 60:23　40:17 83:15\n165:2　66:6 78:17 90:14　66:20,21 84:4　享有特权的 41:3\n加上 72:10 106:7,7　101:23\n罐子　86:18 94:7,11　14:24\n可能\n135:18 140:17　执业 121:21　105:11 109:6　20:20 24:11 28:9\n2:14\n邮政信箱　执业者　110:12 112:9,21　32:9 42:10 45:4\nPohl（波尔） 23:10,15,17　176:13　132:4 155:3.6　52:15,16,19 54:5\n23:24 24:4　前 74:13 84:6　161:2169:11　106:8,8,9 110:17\n点 39:14 40:18　92:22 132:19　170:5,6　116:23 137:8\n48:14 52:20 60:6　133:3,25 160:2,3,3　在场 120:25　138:21 144:5\n61:8 65:25 67:10　172:5,20 177:18　目前 2:21 4:10　170:23 176:19\n75:3 81:11 92:20　177:24 183:4,14　提出 155:13　80:3\n问题\n106:17 123:23　183:16　总统的\n19:19　146:25 160:24\n124:13 130:14　前兆\n17:11　据推定 54:22　162.16\n153:22 166:3　以……为前提\n72:3　68:20　11:3\n程序\n171:10　157:10　推定 114:6　17:19\n要点 25:2 55:17　预测 53:7,13　预设　程序 7:23\n政策 121:17　偏好\n33:15　55:10　70:13\n政策 121:18,22　偏好 33:9　预设\n70:15　进行 11:20\n121:24 122:8　33:14 82:10,18　预设　140:5 165:13\n填充 95:23　84:2 171:18　66:14　程序 4:15\n转运 49:23　偏好 82:16　相当 21:11 22:9　16:22\n构成 37:2　准备 13:20　32:7 37:4 44:22　诉讼程序 39:19\n占有 37:25　15:751:953:5　70:5 179:11　39:21,22 115:10\n38:3 52:14　55:19 56:20 60:19　先前的 36:21　程序 38:14\n可能的 30:17,25　61:9 68:6 73:16　38:6 78:7,10　40:13 67:21 155:9\n31:6 35:25 60:7　86:7 112:4 116:22　116:8 119:6　168:7,22 169:23\n79:6 82:9 84:12　168:10　178:11\n\n出示\n8: 13　152: 16 153: 16,25　q　r\n\n已出示\n128:25　主张人\n118: 12　QPC\n31:23　r\n2:2 5:21,21 6:5\n137: 19 147: 16　拟议的\n5:4,7　季度\n72:8 73:9　48:25 186:2 188:2\n173:12,13,16　54:20 111 :20　73:10　范围\n167:8 176:10\n产品\n46:22　139:3 150:21　季度的\n68:7　范围\n15:13\n83:15,17　保护\n75:9 89:16　71: 19,21,25 72: 18　等级\n29:5\n职业\n166:3　179:4　查询\n158: 18　很少\n42:21 81: 18\n专业的\n17: 14　受保护的\n29: 14　问题\n8:20 9:5　比率\n67:10,11\n17: 17,25 18:8, 12　保护\n83: 18　9:7,11,19,20 27:4　已达成\n23:17,24\n33:1137:22 77:17　保护性\n29: 15\n92:21 156:4 158:3　证明\n86:22　27:6 28:9 34:8, 12　28:20 161:12\n163:3 166:7　提供\n22: 18　34:16,18,19 36:17　162:12,25\n175: 19,20　92:25 171: 11,15　36: 19,25 38: 17　达成\n161:13\n专业人员\n14:8　已提供\n13:14　53:17 56:9 83:20　阅读\n27:6 34: 12\n30:21 54:9,23　59:5 98: 11 99: 10　94: 19,21 96: 17　57:18 65:24 90:16\n57:9 62:8 68:25　117:3 130:9　101: 12 105: 16　120: 16 147:25\n77:25 156:5,5,6,7　140:24 158: 15　108:3,8 110:7,8　写作\n55:18 61:8\n156:8 157:2,3　提供者\n92:21　113:14 114:14　63:18 80:17 88:20\n159:25 175:20　提供\n27: 14　115: 13 116:21　94:20,24 95:11\n181:8　63:21　117:4 118:3 119:4　105:21 106: 12\n简介\n166:10,19　公开的\n1 :20 5 :23　120:3,12 121:16　113:18 115:15\n178:14 179:6,18　186:22 188:6　122: 11 124: 13　准备就绪\n137:21\n项目\n69: 12　拉动\n134: 14　126:5 127:22　真实的\n42:20 77:20\n70:11　Pullman（普尔曼）\n2:12 5:7　130: 18,20 148: 19　94:22 107:6\n149:6,12,25 150:3　113:19,22 114:2,4\n进展\n71:9　165: 17　151: 19,23 154:2　147:6 167:20\n进展\n50:22　冲孔\n99: 11　155:16 163:10,12　意识到\n159:24\n预测\n61: 10　惩罚性的\n164:9　163:12 166:14　确实\n31:274:21\n61:24,24 86:18　购买\n117: 12　177: 13,21 181: 15　133:2 165:4\n87:10　118: 19　184: 10,12　理由\n10:8 76: 15\n显著的\n60: 18　已购买\n117: 13　问题\n47: 17　78: 13 89:4 138:22\n已承诺\n179:23　目的\n39:23,25　83:21 91:3 99:21　142:4,19 143:4,10\n促使\n163:17　77:24　100:6,23 113:5　145: 16\n证据 80:24 81 :2　根据\n10:25　119: 19,21 129: 16　合理的\n21: 13\n81:21　推动\n168:23　135:25 149:2　合理性\n证据\n80: 19　放置\n44: 18 69: 16　153:5 158:5　109: 14 110:3\n适当地\n136:2　131:12 142:7　164: 15 167: 17　158: 10\n财产\n94: 15,21　155:24　179: 17 184:8,23　合理地\n53: 11\n95:12 107:7　放置\n87: 18　迅速\n165:4　推理\n29:21\n113:17 114:2　放置\n109:14　QuickBooks（快账）\n60:25　142:17 143:21\n120:7, 13, 15, 18　180:22　迅速地\n159:6　144:8,11145:10\n122: 11 148:5,14　145:12,21\n\n［理由—报告］\n\n理由\n75:2 77:23　记录\n3 :3, 15 4: 13　提及\n84:11 95:13　依赖\n85:5 104:9\n\n130:3 142: 11　6:4,11,11 8:12　95: 17 96:2 114: 16　177:15 178:6\n168: 15　11: 13, 15, 16,20　119:4 120:5,12　救济 75:4,6\n回忆\n23 :20 32:6　28:2, 18 32: 15　121:4, 17 122: 13　依赖\n84:22\n33 :8 34:7 44: 10　41:10 48:5 90:19　125:8 126:6,7　依赖\n39:2 98:13\n57:21 65:20　90:21 91:2 93:18　127:23 135: 13　123:25 139:6\n126: 17 128:4　100:4 129:5 130:4　144:20　158: 14 176:4\n146:10,13 151:4　139: 19,21 140:4　反映\n132: 10　177:23 179:5\n151:10 161:9　156:9 165:4,8,9,12　133:8 140:22　仍然\n106: 16,24\n173:22　185:2,5 188: 11　已反映\n133 : 14　107:18\n收据\n78: 13　已记录\n1: 14　135: 15 152:8　仍然存在\n74: 12\n收据\n52: 17　3:17　反映\n164:5　184:14\n54:3,14,15 63: 15　记录\n3:13　提示记忆\n36: 16　记得\n21: 14\n66:25 68:22 86: 19　8:10　关于\n15: 17　24:7 43: 14,24\n应收款\n69:22　记录\n15:9,20,23　16:4,4 24:2,9 25:5　59:2 62:22 81:3\n收到\n57: 15　40:14 49:22 52:16　26:4, 11 30: 14　85:24 87:5 105:2\n137: 10 157: 15　82:9 84:12,14,18　59:21 65: 14,19　105:5,15 108:7\n174:24　92: 19 160:22　67:25 102: 15　109:20 110:8\n已收到\n33:20　171:16,20 172:17　111:16 137:13　116: 19 117:4\n92:22 99:17　可追回的\n83 :2　150:3 161: 10　127: 19 130:22\n104: 11 137: 13　追偿款\n175: 15　163:4　142: 13 146: 16\n139:7 140:6　已纠正\n135:5　遗憾\n168:2　159:13 167:12\n160: 10　已删节\n129: 17　重新加入\n41:14　173: 10 176:7\n接收\n33:9　182:6, 16,25　相关\n4:7 19:7　提醒\n167: 10\n161:9　删节\n130:6　49:21 56:9 61:10　远程地\n4: 11\n休庭\n90:22　提及\n97:4,25　90:3 91:4 95: 14　租户\n107:7\n139:22　被提及\n68: 10　138:23 143:5,11　重组\n认可\n10:20　103: 11, 12, 13　188: 14　86: 11 168:21\n48: 15 49:6 93:21　119:23 155:5　涉及\n7:3,8 94: 15　169:15\n111: 11 140:9　159: 10,15　107: 16 111:21　修理\n107:8\n147:20,22　提及\n63: 11　173: 16　144:22\n记忆\n36: 16　113:4,7 119:6　有关\n6:23　修理\n158:22\n44:21 162:24　提及\n65 :7　70:14　重复\n9:5 27:3\n建议\n73 :23　被提及\n27:5　关系　重复\n66: 17\n73:24 74:2 75:7　174:5　143:19　报告\n40: 11 45:7\n75: 17,22 76: 11　指称\n71: 15　关联性\n28:21　46: 11 51: 12 54:6\n80:9 141: 10　95:20 97:4,7, 14　88:11　67:8 68: 11, 19,23\n建议的　104:3 120:9　相关\n27:24　69:7, 10, 13 70:3,6\n144:21　132: 12 135:9　41:4 113:23　70:10,15,19 71:2,4\n核对\n80: 18　150:6 167: 16　116:21 117: 14　71:9,19,21,25 72:4\n123:11　72: 18,21 107:22\n[报告 - 权利]\n\n108:2,2,9 117:5, 15　陈述　答复\n52:4　55: 13 61:8 88: 12\n\n118: 11 122: 16,22　59:21　149:15　111:21 126: 14\n123:8 124:6　代表人　答复\n35:23　175:22\n130: 15,21 132:3　180:5　115:14　已检索\n31: 8, 12\n132:25 134:4,6,24　代表\n9: 12　答复\n12:7　返回\n53:2,3\n135: 11 144:9　20:21 21:10,12　职责　74:23 75:6,8\n147:8 149:25　102:22 113:12　21:20 46: 10,18　76:12,14 77:2,22\n151:25 154:20　代表\n9: 16　负责\n20:2　77:23 78: 14 79: 15\n155:12,15 156:10　100:5 181:13　98:12　79:17,18 86:23\n157: 12,23,23　请求\n26: 19　回应性的\n124: 15　168:9 173:5\n158: 13 159:8,20　108:9 163:18　其余\n17:24　返回\n54: 10 74:3\n160:5,8,25 161: 11　要求\n47:9 60:7　限制\n153:2　74:9 75:24 76:5,6\n161:16,17 163:5　要求\n12: 14,19　洗手间\n139: 17　78: 18 79:9, 11\n163: 13 184:20　17: 19,22 54:25　重组　80:10 169:9 173:3\n已报告\n71:2　55:2 70: 10 76:2　167:22　173:6,11,18\n157:5 160:7　89:5 108: 14　重组　披露\n26: 18\n法庭记录员\n1 :20 4:4　要求\n67:7　170:16,21　披露\n27: 19\n5:10,19 8:11　要求　重组　28:22\n10:13,18 27:7　42:24,24 67:5　17:24 18:7 165:19　收入\n80: 14\n32:12,20 35:7,14　要求\n68:24　166:11,13,16,20　审查\n27:22\n47:23 48:4 78:9　86:25 89:10　166:24 167:7,16　43:22 51:23 52:19\n93:11,16 111:3,10　居住\n150: 15　167:21 170: 11,21　53:10 60:7 61:9\n128:23 129: 13　172: 17　恢复审理\n139:23　62: 12 68:6 72: 17\n131:18,19 140:2　住所\n101:5,9　保留\n48: 8, 19　73: 16 124:20\n147:12,14 171:13　102:5 113: 16　49:3 181:7　125:17 135:24\n187: 15　114:6,9 118:6, 10　被保留\n34:6　150: 19 158:2\n报告\n19: 18　150: 13　36:22 37:6 39:7　162:5 171:19\n42:23 52: 18 54:2　住所\n19: 14　39: 15,18,20 72: 17　已审查\n13 :8, 11\n66:21 67:4 68:8　114: 14 118:3　143:11 187:15　62: 18,20 81:24\n108: 14 148:24　居民\n76: 12　预付费\n32:22,24　84: 13, 18 109: 13\n149:3 155:6, 10　居住\n114:5　32:25 33 :5, 10, 12　110:3 112:24\n报告\n22: 19　118:5　33: 16,20 35:24　114:21 141:3\n66:21 68:7 107:22　关于\n21 :20　36:4,8 126:6　审查\n80: 17\n116:22 117: 16　92:25 95:7　174:25 175:17　82:8 112:11\n157: 19 161:23　答复\n89: 11　176:5,8 177: 19,24　160:15 171:16\n162:3 168:9 169:7　178:24,24　保留\n34:5　修订\n139:5\n169: 12　已答复\n36:20　35:21 36: 18 37:3　Rhode（罗德）\n176: 15,21\n代表\n30:2　65:4　39:4　权利\n7: 10 10: 19\n129:7 140: 16　答复\n35: 18　保留\n74:7 162:6　38: 19 53 :24 55 :22\n144: 13 176: 17, 19　51: 16　保留\n7:8　61:3 62:16 63:6\n43:16,17,19 44:16　64: 16 70: 17 71:6\n\n[权利 - 服务器]\n\n73 :4 81: 15 84:9　178:7 181:3,5　124:25 128:3　142:20,24 143:3,5\n\n90:7 94:8 95:21　Rudnick's（鲁德尼克的）\n126: 14　135:5,7,9 136:10　143:10,23 159:14\n98:2 100: 11　规则\n10:25 11:22　155:25　184:3\n126: 19 130: 11　规则\n11 :2 117:5　预定\n81:14　见\n11:23 28:21\n134: 12 136: 19　161:3　日程\n14:6　33:6 35:25 45:22\n138:5 152:5　裁决\n29: 12　30:23 44:22 45:25　57:19 61:12 68:8\n153: 17,20 154:22　运行\n22:2 58:9　51: 10 55 :20,25　82:11,25 88:11\n165:20 169: 16　67:10,11 178:21　56: 14 57: 12,17,25　95:17 96:6 121:8\n170:8 173:23　运行中\n21 :23　58: 17,22 60:20,24　121:19 125:6\n177: 14　172:9,10　69:4 100:10　132:15 141:2\n权利\n29:2　运行\n178:22　111: 16 112:2,5　148:9 151: 16\n道路\n113:20　Russo（鲁索）\n2:6 4:24,24　113:6 168:8　155:21 159:2,3\n牛仔竞技\n89:3　s　183:13　168:5 183 :20\n角色\n50:7, 12 52:9　Schindler（辛德勒）\n13:8　看见\n57:21\n53:18 94:6,10　s\n2:2 74: 10 187:2　31:25 49: 16 50:9　127:19\n98:11 102:3　安全\n123:10　56:5,24 112: 18　寻求\n124: 10,12\n105:25 106:3　安全\n138 :24　学校\n17:3,5　看见\n79:8, 12\n112:9 134:21　144: 10 182: 11　科学\n17:7　109:15 121:23\n168: 11 169: 17,20　销售\n42:7　范围\n43:8 44:12　127:24 128: 19\n171:25 172:4　理智\n158:9　90: 13 171:9　137:6 145:7 164:8\n角色\n23:2 51: 18　保存\n162:4　Scotch（苏格兰威士忌）\n164:22　164:13\n滚动\n157:4　看见\n62:22 79: 13　慌乱\n69:4　选择\n75:20\n滚动\n158: 15　79: 15 126: 13　划痕\n71: 11　出售\n122:6\n房间\n4: 11 127: 12　128:4 153:4　99:16 106:2　语义\n39: 13\nRudnick（鲁德尼克）\n2:8 5:4　159:23 162: 19　搜索\n15: 19,20　参议员\n19: 19\n15:21 23: 10, 16　163:13 173:3　49:21 82:25　发送\n15:21 24: 15\n24:6,8,18 25:9　说\n37:9 149:20　第二\n45: 16 61:7　162:7\n26:5,6, 11 30:9　149:21 162: 13　114:16 121:6　意义\n38:2 158:4\n说\n33:4 34:15\n31:20 32:4 38: 10　87:7 91:23 116:6　125:2　158:25\n38: 12 39:2, 16　116:7 162:7, 15　秘密\n106:21　敏感\n3 :6\n43 :23 49:24 56: 13　184:9, 10　秘密\n120: 14　已发送\n13:17 31:20\n57:4 58:25 59:7　害怕\n143: 16, 18　部分\n75:5 97:17　49:24\n59:10,17 64:20　143:19　105:23 106:4　判刑\n121:6\n83:18 98:25 99:7　情形\n20: 14　114: 19　125:2\n102:12,18 103:18　日程\n59:22　安全的\n167:22　单独\n74:4,5,14\n103:18 104:11,17　60:3 71:14 81:14　已担保\n20: 19　74:22 107:21\n104: 17 105:7,13　94:7,20,23 95: 12　21:7 42:15 81:7　129:5 131 :7 132:7\n106:6 109:24　96: 13 98:23 103 :9　安全\n33: 17　September（九月）\n17: 10\n112: 14 124:2　103:23 104:8　115:24 118:8,25　送达\n7:5\n126:7 139:7 156:2\n157:15 175:18　108: 12 109: 16,17　133:23 138:16,22\n138:24 142: 14,18　服务器\n13:24 49:22\n[送达 - 开始]\n\n送达\n92:21　签名\n188:21　某一天\n169: 17　花费\n21:23\n\n138: 11 145:5,5　签署人\n37:24 52: 14　某人的\n171:4　分拆\n118: 18\n服务\n18:24　65:3　某处\n110:21　说话\n13:5,7 14:15\n21:21 85:21 90:4　重大\n13 :9　儿子\n58:9,11,13　14:21 16:8 31:2\n设定\n101:7 161:8　59:5　很快\n159:4　57:6\n188:10,19　显著地　抱歉\n3:5 7:14　说过\n14:24\n设定\n47:5 83:17　160: 14　23:11 35:3 41:7　174: 11,18,22\n和解\n78:6　Silverberg（西尔弗伯格）\n13 :6　83:11 94:19 95:16　配偶\n118: 14\n171:2　24:5 33:4 34:4　126:4 130:19　145: 18 150: 14\n和解\n77: 10　37:2 38:5 39:6　171:13 176:11　配偶的\n121: 18\n七\n75:15　Silverberg's（西尔弗伯格的）\n35: 19　种类\n52:8 55:6　传播\n21:25\n136: 18　类似\n113: 17　种类\n17: 15 42:23　电子表格\n第七\n92: 19　同时　54: 15 167:25　135: 14 158:6\n摇动\n8:24　44:23　声音\n84:9　160:19\n形状\n62:10　单一\n53: 10 75:22　来源\n62:24　Spring（斯普林）\n2:17 5:16\n形状\n42:2　先生\n85:16 100:6,14　77: 12 87:25 105:2　27:17,18 28:17,23\nShea（谢伊）\n2:17　153: 18　175:7,8,13,25　29:6 57:24 58:3\n表\n69:20 131: 14　坐着\n19:25　刮刀\n101 :22　179:6,9,12 180:6,7\n133: 15 138: 16　情况\n104:20　说\n14:18 15:14　180: 10,15,20\n158: 12　121:23　23:25 24:9,17　181: 17,20 182:20\n表\n109:4　六\n162:10　25:5,10 26:2　183 :5,8 184:6\nSherry（雪莉）\n114: 17,25　大小\n42:2　44:17 144:25　Spring's（斯普林的）\n28:8\n146:21,25 150:5　滑落\n87:4　174:20,21 181:24　182:10,15,19\n150:16,17 151:16　小\n45: 12 88:5　说话\n35:20　Springs（斯普林斯）\n26: 19\n153:20 154: 11　134:17 173:17　115:7,14 151:10　28:10,14\nSherry's（雪莉的）\n146:25　社会\n120:23,24　具体\n14:7 51:11　广场\n1: 18 2:4,9\n粪便\n176: 11　沙发\n55:25 56:14　94: 17 100: 12,14　3:25\n短\n104:20　57: 12, 17,24 58: 16　100:19 101:2　ss\n188:4\n139:22　58:22 59:22 60:2　104:4 110:24　刺\n43:22\n速记\n1:20　94:7 98:23 109: 16　111: 19 112: 12,20　工作人员 20:4 24: 12\n显示\n146:9　沙发的\n14:5 44:21　157:25　51: 17 52:8,9,24\n显示了\n141:24　45:25 51:10 60:19　具体地\n20:25　53:14,17,20 54:4,7\n159:22　60: 19,23 69:4　43:15 51:7 72:20　66:20\n显示\n101: 19　83:22 112:2 113:5　具体内容\n83:10,16　印章\n129:2\n已显示\n132:21　168:8 170:5　指定\n186: 11　盖章\n35:9\n147:7　软件\n60:16,18　推测\n127:4　标准\n70:8\n显示\n117:20　61:2,5　推测\n93 :6　121:21\n158:5,21,23　唯一\n52: 14　拼写\n23: 12, 13　开始\n6: 17 7:22\n兄弟姐妹\n42:4　仅\n104:9　花费\n15:5 78:4　79:25\n签署人\n38:23\n66:18　某人\n183:7　165:25　已开始\n17: 11 23 :4\n45:6 153:4,7\n\n[开始 - 团队]\n\n162: 18 182:21　删除\n29: 14　支持\n36:21　77:6 82:20 111:23\n\n开始\n33:14　罢工\n25 :4 30:6　支持\n51: 17　134: 17 139: 18\n83 :25 97:9 109:5　116:20 157: 13　支持\n60: 18　165:3 173:2\n130: 14　结构化\n65 :23　应当\n74:20　179:25 184:25\n开始\n96: 17　66:7　162: 17 167: 12　已取得\n79:4 90:23\n109:21　存根\n72:9　确定\n7:4, 11,23　139:23\n州\n1:20 4: 12, 15　东西 30:25 168:7　27: 16 31 :24 32:2　采取\n47: 15\n5:23 6:3 27:2　受制于\n8:7 12: 11　32:7 37:4 38: 12　谈话\n7:20 8: 18 17:2\n42:22 73: 17 76: 16　14:2 29:14 53:10　38:13 43:13,21　80:7 146:3\n76:16 79:14 101:3　147:23　44:19 73:4 75:10　谈过\n16:3 21: 18\n156:5 188:3,7　认购\n186: 18　81:8 88:13 99:22　30: 10, 15 46:2,9, 13\n陈述\n26: 17　实质上　104:6 110: 13,14　55: 14 59:9 127:9\n164: 10 171: 19　149:5　110:16 113:3,8,11　128: 12,16 129:20\n陈述\n14:5　减去\n133:6　124:8 125:25　134: 10 137:24\n34:12 37:2 154:6　成功\n82:5　127: 14 129:6　154:25 158: 16\n55:19 73:6 111:17　成功的\n86: 10　135:25 136: 10　164:3\n112:4 158:8　遭受\n9:24　137: 16 141:5　谈话\n29:25\n陈述\n8:25　充分\n42: 12　150:25 158:4,11　64: 15 79:23 85:2\n69:19 111:14　建议\n143:6　165:6 167: 13　96:12 98:25 103:8\n州\n1:23 3:19　暗示\n142:12　173 :25 174:23　104 :4 138: 19\n42:6 54:23 62:5　142:17　176:7 179: 11　146: 13 160: 16, 16\n69:11,19 71:20　建议\n145:24　惊讶\n83 :24　160: 17 162: 18\n72:2,22 157:7　建议\n141:3　周围　任务\n89:4\n162:8 171:11　141:8　182:12　任务\n88:22 170:2\n176: 19　套房\n2: 18 6:8　怀疑\n170:25　170:7\n统计的\n94:3　总和\n72: 11 96: 17　宣誓\n5:10,19　税\n19:21,22 52:25\n法规\n75: 16　135:17　宣誓\n8:4　53:3,4 54:8,9\n82:22　概述　宣誓的\n5:22 186:5　73: 17 74:3,8 75:6\n法规\n75: 16　155:24　186: 18 188: 10　75:7,24 76: 14\n法定地\n72:24　摘要\n94:2　系统\n60: 10　77:2,16,22,24 78:3\n停留\n18:2 123:9,13　129:21 130:9　t　78:17 79:9,11\n停留\n123:8　153:3　80:8,10 168:9\n步骤\n13: 19 46:2　太阳\n59: 14　t\n5:21 6:5 186:2　169:9 173 :3,5,6, 11\n69:25　补充　187:2 188:2,2　173: 18\n迈步\n49: 13　132:24　标签\n10: 12 32: 11　征税\n19:9 22:2\nSteven（史蒂文）\n23 :9, 15,24　支持\n19:6 22:4　34:22 131:2 146:7　税款\n42:7,7 53:5\n24:4　22:8 40:6 49:2　表\n49:9, 10 50:4　73:24 74: 17 77:20\n街道\n2:13, 186:8　51 :24,24 55 :21　Taconic（塔科尼克）\n113 :20\n尾部\n45:4　107:6\nStretto（斯特雷托）\n89:22 90:8　85: 19 112:6　采取\n3: 13 9: 10　征税\n75: 11\n90:14 92:5,10,14　162:21 172:8　14:25 31:25 33:3　团队\n55:7 56:20\n92:24　35:15 53:8 67:5　59: 10 106:6,6\n[团队 - 顶部]\n\n109:24 110:16　事情 19:17 64:19　172:11 173:16,17　44:24 45:19 52:20\n\n138:19,20 153:13　66:3 79:13 117:23　177:12 178:16.16　60:6 65:25 81:11\n技术性 56:9　124:21 135:12　181:19 182:22　97:3 104:21 106:8\n74:22\n技术上　157:2 162:15　183:21 184:20　116:13 117:18\n169:6\n技术　事物 6:21 22:5　认为 40:8　118:23 123:24\n电话会议　51:21 54:18 69:14　117:7 123:12　136:13 137:11\n2:19　100:24 124:4　149:9　138:2 139:20\n电话 45:15　156:22 161:2　第三 63:18 64:15　140:3 146:23\n告知 124:19,24　167:19 179:2　117:6 119:24　154:5 155:20\n127:3 135:8　认为 9:14 14:11　122:6 130:24　156:14,22 157:11\n154:14 184:15　14:12 16:17 18:15　133:12 184:10　157:25 159:25\n告知 118:21　19:8 20:20 21:9　第三方\n184:2　160:14,15,21\n7:17 15:11\n十　24:13 28:25 30:16　认为 37:12　162:6 165:7.11\n时态 85:3,3,4　30:20 31:2,5 34:6　38:18 46:25 56:21　174:2,10 178:25\n87:4 125:13\n期限　34:11 36:13,19,22　95:14 114:2　179:12 186:10\n作证 5:24 6:15　37:5,10 39:7,13,21　126:15 127:15　80:10 145:9\n及时\n88:9　40:9 43:9 45:10　138:20 142:7　次数 1:18 2:4,9\n作证 10:2,9 12:2　45:24 47:19 49:13　153:9,13 161:21　3:25 6:18 7:15\n12:14,21 40:15　51:3 52:12 55:4　174:6 175:12　14:24 60:14\n41:2 186:5　56:10 60:8,17,20　想法\n151:3　104:23 177:11\n正在作证 7:25　70:6 73:22 76:20　千 126:6　时间安排 78:24 79:5\n11:5 28:16　79:18 81:10,22　132:21,22 140:17　134:25\n证词 10:6　85:19 87:8 90:5　146:19 152:7　Timothy（蒂莫西） 2:19 5:15\n22:19 185:6 186:6　91:18 94:5 95:13　154:12 159:16,16　标题 21:15 86:12\n186:10 188:12　103:9 106:20,24　159:18 166:2　101:8 114:25\n70:24\n第　106:25 109:16,18　177:2 183:24,25　今天   7:25 8:13\n感谢 7:13 12:9　110:2,10,23 113:3　受到威胁 143:16　9:13 10:10 11:5\n14:14 19:20 29:23　115:23 118:12　19:272:7\n三　15:4 159:5\n35:2 38:7,25 41:5　119:17 123.9　75:16 109:23　今天的\n13:21\n41:13 45:24 56:25　124:21 125:17　112:16 161:25　185:6\n90:19 94:24 96:14　126:11,13,15　163:10　告知 63:6 102:10\n99:25 102:21　128:3,5 137:24　137:17\n系结　104:17 143:17\n103:2,3 113:13　139:3 140:6,15　直到\n17:9 153:4　147:3 153:19\n119:2,4 128:19　141:19,25 144:7　15:18 28:13\nTim（蒂姆）　181:2 182:14\n133:4 144:12　146:6,18,25 151:2　41:13 49:19　184:21\n159:6 161:8　152:4 153:8,14　时间 1:11,174:16　今晚 85:13\n感谢\n41:16　154:18,24 155:5　11:14,18 15:9　顶部 14:13 18:2\n\n144:18\n主题　159:7,10 161:12　16:18,19 17:13　33:4 41:18 48:23\n55:21\n与此相关　163:2 167:7　19:8 21:12,23　97:5,8 130:10\n112:6　168:20 170:6,18　24:22 40:18 43:16　151:13 155:4\n\nPAX-014-079\n\n[主题 - 使用]\n\n主题\n12:2　70:11 72:6,12,22　134:6 141: 13,23　47:7 63:22 65:21\n\n主题\n11:22 12:15　73:13 162:8,12　155: 14 159:25　76:21 90: 13 92:9\n12:22　176: 18　161: 19, 19 179: 18　92:13 107:18\n总计\n94:22 95: 12　真相\n186:5　181:19 183:25　108: 19 113 :21\n96:5 132: 10 133 :5　真实\n8:5 10:6　184:2　115:20 119:9\n133:6,23,24 136:9　如实\n10:2,9　类型\n17: 15,20　121:3 141: 15\n完全\n29:9,15　尝试\n8:20 15:22　68:14 122:14　147:4 149: 10, 11\n42:18　61:25 149:8 161:5　148:8,17　149: 13,19 180:25\n塔楼\n3:25　171:5　类型\n22:5 51 :22　182: 17 183 :2\n追踪\n124:17　正在尝试\n14:1121:9　53: 15 77: 15,18　理解\n9:3\n贸易\n120: 14　45:9 48: 14 132: 15　通常\n43 :20　88:6 89:17 100:16\n商标\n120:4　135:23,25 136:5　69: 13 86: 15 131:9　133:4 145:8\n120:14　162:14 163:10　154:9 166:5\nc----------------j　未披露\n139:9\n交易\n126:9　170: 14 174:2　呃　139: 11,12\n交易性的　TurboTax（税务软件）\n60:23　72:6,12 73:13　未听闻\n176:24\n80:12　轮次\n3:9 11:8,21　美国\n161: 10 162: 12　单位\n3:16\n交易\n80:9　33:2 68:5 96:24　呃\n8:25　联合\n1:2 3:19\n82:9,25 84: 13　105: 18 137:23　最终\n150:22　54:23 62:5 69: 11\n171:17　转向\n20:24 23 :5　未\n42:7,8,9　69:19 71:20 72:2\n记录\n8: 14　29:24 34:3 35:23　不清楚\n47:2　72:22 157:7 162:8\n186:9,9　37:18 41:5 43:6　揭露\n40:22　宇宙\n154:6\n转让\n82: 10　48:22 49:9 50:4　已揭露\n40:23　未遵守\n42:9\n152:22 171:18　55:12 61:7 73:15　表现不佳　未知\n130: 10\n转让\n82:20　80:16 82:7 85:17　19:5　140:24 157: 17\n翻译\n57:8,14　86:5 88:19,19　理解\n7:24　未支付\n156: 13\n57: 16,19　91:4 92: 18 95: 11　8:3,15,21 9:2,4,7　未登记\n旅行\n123 :2,21　103 :7 106: 11　9: 15,20,22 11 :25　120:6,17\n143:3　109:3 113:13　12:13,18 25:19　无关\n14:22\n旅行\n115:24　115:12 120:3　27:11 34:11,13,16　无担保\n167:23\n处理\n77:21　124:25 126:5　34: 17 40: 16 58:7　更新\n137: 17\n尝试过\n59: 13 134:25　130:8 132:6　81:17 86:21　维护\n107:9\n136: 11　140: 11 148:3　112: 19 115:7　上传\n109: 17\n卡车\n97: 14　149:14 151:13　129: 14 147: 18　109:20\n真实\n157:2 172: 15　159:7　148: 11 150:5　UPS（联合包裹服务公司）\n164: 18\n186:9 188: 11　轮次\n144:24　153:5 158:11　使用\n53: 11 64:24\n受托人\n54:23　Twitter（推特）\n120:20　166: 14 169:2　113: 18,22 115: 15\n69: 11 71:20 72:2　两\n14:24 15: 11　170:17 175:10　116:6,10 117:3,7\n157:7 163:17　15: 12 50: 16 62:20　177:20　117:22,24 119:7\n176:21,22　77: 15 82:23 87: 18　理解　122: 19 139: 17\n受托人\n20: 16　90:7 92:8 129:5　11:4 27: 18 28: 11　158:24 162:4\n62:6 68:24 69: 19　132: 18 133: 10　32:23 37: 15 38:8　169:5\n\n60:17 115:21\n使用　55:15 56:19,23　165:7,11 184:25　104:19,21 117:25\n\n通常 69:15,16　57:2 58:15,21　185:4　134:15 141:17\n81:12 83:25 86:25　59:15,25 61:14,18　视频\n120:8, 19　156:23 162:2\n87:11,18 117:17　64:11 65:9,13　查看\n36:25 107:2　188:16\n134:15 154:11　66:10 67:9,12,15　148:18 149:6　77:22\n方式\n公用事业\n144:12　67:24 71:12,18　166:10,19,23　16:3 20:16\n我们已经\n72:17 73:18 76:10　170:10　20:20 21:4,10,10\nV　76:25 78:16 80:20　实际上 74:19　22:13 30:10,15\nV&L\n56:3　82:3 83:4 84:17　169:8 176:18.20　44:20 45:10 55:14\nV&L 的\n88:12　84:22 85:25 87:19　访问 118:16 142:5　67:14 85:8 94:5\n有价值的\n116:3　87:23 89:18 93:3　访问\n118.9　128:12 129:20\n估值\n121:10　自愿提出\n184:8　132:3 134:10\n121:13　94:6,10 95:3\n价值 67:15　96:20 97:10,15　W　154:18,21 158:16\n102:24 120:22　98:5 99:5 100:8　等待\n8:19　162:16 163:20\n121:7,19,22,25　101:13 102:3　55:16 94:13\nWakk（瓦克）　164:3\n122:3,5　106:2 107:23　步行\n110:16　富有的\n19:13\n货车 97:14　109:5.11 111:20　步行\n98:4　网站\n162:8\n各种\n18:2 20:3　112:8,16,17,20　141:7　星期三 16:17\n42:2,5,6 51:16　122:15 124:9　Wan（万） 1:5 2:9 3:18　45:17 116:2,16\n54:22 57:9 58:24　125:22 128:10　5:5 11:6 94:4　123:16,18 126:12\n59:6 69:22 75:11　134:21 135:15,19　111:18　174:15 182:23\n118:24 120:8,13　136:22 140:23　16:25 40:21\n想要　周\n42:13\n120:19 183:13　144:21 149:11　40:22 44:17 45:18　66:24\n每周\n车辆 115:23,24　163:17　55:16 66:23 75:21　欢迎 41:14\n117:13,22,23　Verdolino's（韦尔多利诺的） 130:14　94:13 104:2　去了 17:5.8 31:5\n车辆 115:14,21　59:16 138:3\n核实　105:18 107:5,12　43:24 45:19\nVeritext（维瑞泰克斯特） 4:3,5　146:3 147:19　122:23,24,25\n116:9,13 117:2,8\n118:25　176:17\nVermont（佛蒙特州）　149:8 168:18　123:5 174:7\n1:15 7:9\nVerdolino（韦尔多利诺）　版本\n79:16　17:4\n西部\n127:13 133:15　172:3　任何\n10:25 12:14,22　137:17,24 140:12　想要 45:21　123:22\n13:24 15:16 17:12　140:20,22 150:10　105:10 110:14　兹证明 188:18\n18:22,25 19:25　对 38:9 41:24　144:7 163:22　耳语 3:7\n20:10,15 21:15,20　119:24　想要 69:20 172:2　138.25\n妻子\n22:24 23:6,18,25　视频 1:14 3:13,17　172.3　141:13 142:8,24\n24:17 25:7 26:3　摄像师 2:22　Washington（华盛顿） 6:8　145:14\n30:11.13 31:15　3:2 4:4 5:9.18　34:24\n水　愿意 64:20\n36:7.18 37:3.23　8:10 11:14,18　船舶 97:15　67:18,20\nWIP\n38:21 39:4,17　34:23 35:4 90:20　119:5　152:21\n电汇\n43:7 44:13 48:8　90:24 139:20　水印 162:6　证人 5:11,20,22\n48:20 49:4,14,18　140:3 164:25　方式 47:21 54:19　26:21 27:8 28:15\n49:25 50:15,20　62:10 67:3 75:14\n\n[证人 - 零]\n\n29:10,11,1635:3\n46:21 59:12 78:11　收尾\n91:3\n96:8　Z\n\n83:8 85:10 116:12　包裹\n书写\n36:13 41:18　67:14 79:20\n零\n130:2 131:4,12　177:10　82:21 94:24\n148:2 164:20　34:439:6\n书写　106:13,16,24\n167:9 176:11　书面材料\n113:9　107:19 108:20,23\n书面 8:12 65:18　146:4,11\n185:9 188:9, 12, 18\n20:21\n词语　119:8 121:2\n词语\n27.9　126:10\n\n17:8 19:9,11\n工作\n22:19 40:4 42:10　错误 73:5 162:13\n170:24\n\n43:8 44:13 46:22　写道 37:5 181:25\n54:5,8,9 56:12,13　182:4\n57:17 58:20 59:24　X\n61:14,18 64:11　1:3,8 187:2,17\nX\n66:4,11 67:21\n68:14 70:14 73:3　Y\n73:18 76:24 78:15　游艇\n119:7\n80:19 83:14,15,17　是\n59:13 170:13\n84:2 86:2 88:10　172:25\n88:14,17 89:17　年 42:13 74:11\n90:2,3,13 97:10,16　74:12 75:15,16\n97:20 98:6 109:10　82:23 154:10,13\n112:14,20 121:11　年 7:17 17:13\n125:23 135:19　18:3 20:21 82:23\n154:19,25 167:24　82:24 166:3,4\n169:22 176:20　169:3 176:7\n177:2 178:2,5　36:2 95:22\n是\n已工作\n15:20 45:2　121:9 178:8,10\n56:16 92:5 95:5　昨天 106:22\n100:17 109:22　123:16 126:12\n135:22 136:4,9　York（约克） 1:18,19,21\n工作 51:18　2:5,5,10,10 3:25\n90:6 96:22 136:15　4:2 5:23 58:8\n155:25 178:4　79:15,17 115:8,10\n工作 134:15　146:22 173:19\n176:9　176:14 188:3,7\n世界 38:2　120:20\nYouTube（优兔）\n担心 182:10\n价值 19:10,25\n\n《联邦民事诉讼规则》\n\n规则 30\n\n(e) 证人审阅；更正。\n\n(1) 审阅；更正说明。在证言录取完成前，经证人或一方当事人请求，证人必须在官员通知其笔录或录音可供查阅后获得 30 天时间，在该期间内：(A) 审阅笔录或录音；以及 (B) 如形式或内容上存在更正，应签署一份列明更正内容及作出更正理由的声明。\n\n(2) 官员证明书中注明的更正。官员必须在规则 30 (f) (1) 规定的证明书中注明是否请求审阅；如已请求，必须附上证人在该 30 天期间内作出的任何更正。\n\n免责声明：上述联邦程序规则仅供参考之用。上述规则截至 APRIL 1, 2019 为现行有效。请参阅适用的《联邦民事诉讼规则》以获取最新信息。\n\nVERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS COMPANY（维瑞泰克斯特法律解决方案公司）证明书及披露声明\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions（维瑞泰克斯特法律解决方案公司）声明，上述笔录是根据法庭记录员提交的交谈、问题及回答所作出的真实、准确且完整的笔录。维瑞泰克斯特法律解决方案公司进一步声明，所附证物（如有）是法庭记录员和/或律师就本次证言录取所提交的真实、准确且完整的文件，且该等文件已按照我们的诉讼支持及制作标准进行处理。\n\n维瑞泰克斯特法律解决方案公司致力于依照经修订的《健康保险流通与责任法案》（Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act，HIPAA）就受保护健康信息颁布的法规，以及经修订的《格拉姆—里奇—布莱利法案》（Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act）就个人身份识别信息（Personally Identifiable Information，PII）颁布的法规，维护客户及证人信息的保密性。实体笔录及证物受到严格的设施及人员访问控制管理。电子文件以加密形式存储，并以加密方式传送给经认证而获准访问该等材料的各方。我们的数据托管于经 Tier 4 SSAE 16 认证的设施中。\n\n维瑞泰克斯特法律解决方案公司遵守所有关于提供法庭记录服务的联邦及州法规，并且无论与任何诉讼的关系或其财务结果如何，均保持中立和独立。维瑞泰克斯特要求其所有分包商在其独立承包商协议中遵守上述专业及道德标准。\n\n有关维瑞泰克斯特法律解决方案公司的保密及安全政策和惯例的询问，应向本文件封面所列的维瑞泰克斯特客户服务专员或通过 www.veritext.com 提出。","key_entities":["Je","CIPA","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","GTV","GETTR"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":19,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":120,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":56181,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-04-22 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-04-22","updated_at":"2026-08-23 23:32:21"}