{"id":"court_ctb_2649_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":2649,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"UNKNOWN","filed_date":null,"title":"B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15) | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET
(Instructions on Reverse)","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET
(Instructions on Reverse) | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NUMBER
(Court Use Only) | | |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|\n| PLAINTIFFS | DEFENDANTS | | |\n| ATTORNEYS (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone No.) | ATTORNEYS
(If Known) | | |\n| PARTY (Check One Box Only)
□ Debtor
□ U.S.
Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin
□ Creditor
□ Other
□ Trustee | PARTY (Check One Box Only)
□ Debtor
□ U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy
Admin
□ Creditor
□ Other
□ Trustee | | |\n| CAUSE OF ACTION
(WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF ACTION, INCLUDING ALL U.S. STATUTES INVOLVED)
NATURE OF SUIT | | | |\n| (Number up to five (5) boxes starting with lead cause of action as 1, first alternative cause as 2, second alternative cause as 3, etc.) | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(1) – Recovery of Money/Property
□
11-Recovery of money/property - §542 turnover of property
□
12-Recovery of money/property - §547 preference
□
13-Recovery of money/property - §548 fraudulent transfer
□
14-Recovery of money/property - other
FRBP 7001(2) – Validity, Priority or Extent of Lien
□
21-Validity, priority or extent of lien or other interest in property | FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability (continued)
□
61-Dischargeability - §523(a)(5), domestic support
□
68-Dischargeability - §523(a)(6), willful and malicious injury
□
63-Dischargeability - §523(a)(8), student loan
□
64-Dischargeability - §523(a)(15), divorce or separation obligation
(other than domestic support)
□
65-Dischargeability - other | | |\n| FRBP 7001(3) – Approval of Sale of Property
□
31-Approval of sale of property of estate and of a co-owner - §363(h) | FRBP 7001(7) – Injunctive Relief
□
71-Injunctive relief – imposition of stay
□
72-Injunctive relief – other | | |\n| FRBP 7001(4) – Objection/Revocation of Discharge
□
41-Objection / revocation of discharge - §727(c),(d),(e) | FRBP 7001(8) Subordination of Claim or Interest
□
81-Subordination of claim or interest | | |\n| FRBP 7001(5) – Revocation of Confirmation
□
51-Revocation of confirmation | FRBP 7001(9) Declaratory Judgment
□
91-Declaratory judgment | | |\n| FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability
□
66-Dischargeability - §523(a)(1),(14),(14A) priority tax claims
□
62-Dischargeability - §523(a)(2), false pretenses, false representation,
actual fraud
□
67-Dischargeability - §523(a)(4), fraud as fiduciary, embezzlement, larceny
(continued next column) | FRBP 7001(10) Determination of Removed Action
□
01-Determination of removed claim or cause
Other
□
SS-SIPA Case – 15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.
□
02-Other (e.g. other actions that would have been brought in state court
if unrelated to bankruptcy case) | | |\n| □ Check if this case involves a substantive issue of state law | □ Check if this is asserted to be a class action under FRCP 23 | | |\n| □ Check if a jury trial is demanded in complaint | Demand \\$ | | |\n| Other Relief Sought | | | |\n\n#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| BANKRUPTCY CASE IN WHICH THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ARISES | | | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| NAME OF DEBTOR | | BANKRUPTCY CASE NO. | |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING | | DIVISION OFFICE | NAME OF JUDGE |\n| RELATED ADVERSARY PROCEEDING (IF ANY) | | | |\n| PLAINTIFF | DEFENDANT | | ADVERSARY
PROCEEDING NO. |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH ADVERSARY IS PENDING | | DIVISION OFFICE | NAME OF JUDGE |\n| SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF) | | | |\n| DATE | | PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF) | |\n\n#### **INSTRUCTIONS**\n\nThe filing of a bankruptcy case creates an \"estate\" under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court which consists of all of the property of the debtor, wherever that property is located. Because the bankruptcy estate is so extensive and the jurisdiction of the court so broad, there may be lawsuits over the property or property rights of the estate. There also may be lawsuits concerning the debtor's discharge. If such a lawsuit is filed in a bankruptcy court, it is called an adversary proceeding.\n\nA party filing an adversary proceeding must also must complete and file Form 1040, the Adversary Proceeding Cover Sheet, unless the party files the adversary proceeding electronically through the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system (CM/ECF). (CM/ECF captures the information on Form 1040 as part of the filing process.) When completed, the cover sheet summarizes basic information on the adversary proceeding. The clerk of court needs the information to process the adversary proceeding and prepare required statistical reports on court activity.\n\nThe cover sheet and the information contained on it do not replace or supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, the Bankruptcy Rules, or the local rules of court. The cover sheet, which is largely selfexplanatory, must be completed by the plaintiff's attorney (or by the plaintiff if the plaintiff is not represented by an attorney). A separate cover sheet must be submitted to the clerk for each complaint filed.\n\n**Plaintiffs** and **Defendants.** Give the names of the plaintiffs and defendants exactly as they appear on the complaint.\n\n**Attorneys.** Give the names and addresses of the attorneys, if known.\n\n**Party**. Check the most appropriate box in the first column for the plaintiffs and the second column for the defendants.\n\n**Demand.** Enter the dollar amount being demanded in the complaint.\n\n**Signature.** This cover sheet must be signed by the attorney of record in the box on the second page of the form. If the plaintiff is represented by a law firm, a member of the firm must sign. If the plaintiff is pro se, that is, not represented by an attorney, the plaintiff must sign.\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|\n| In re: | :
:
Chapter 11 |\n| 1
HO WAN KWOK,
et al., | :
:
Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |\n| Debtors.
----------------------------------------------------------- | :
:
(Jointly Administered)
:
x |\n| LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11
TRUSTEE,
Plaintiff,
v. | :
:
:
:
Adv. Proceeding No. [ ]
:
: |\n| STYLE EYES INC. D/B/A
GINGER FINDS, | :
:
February 10, 2024
:
: |\n| Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------------- | :
:
x |\n\n## **COMPLAINT OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE SEEKING AVOIDANCE AND RECOVERY OF FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND RELATED RELIEF PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY CODE SECTIONS 544, 548 AND 550 AND NEW YORK DEBTOR & CREDITOR LAW SECTIONS 273, 274, AND 276**\n\nLuc A. Despins, in his capacity as the chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in the\n\nchapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\") of Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\" or \"Kwok\"), files this\n\n1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nadversary complaint (the \"Complaint\") against defendant Style Eyes Inc. d/b/a Ginger Finds (the \"Defendant\"), stating as follows:\n\n### **NATURE OF ACTION**\n\n1. The Trustee commences this adversary proceeding to avoid and recover transfers of the Debtor's property prior to the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case.\n\n2. The Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, G Fashion and Lexington Property & Staffing, Inc. (\"Lexington\") transferred funds in the amount of \\$225,000.00 prior to the Petition Date (as defined herein) to the Defendant as the initial transferee.\n\n3. These transfers were actually fraudulent, because the Debtor effectuated them as part of his \"shell game,\" and they were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors.\n\n### **JURISDICTION AND VENUE**\n\n4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b).\n\n5. This adversary proceeding has been referred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a).\n\n6. The statutory predicates for the relief sought herein include sections 544, 548 and 550 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the \"Bankruptcy Code\") and New York Debtor & Creditor Law sections 273, 274, and 2762 or any other applicable state law equivalents.\n\n### **THE PARTIES**\n\n2 All statutory references to New York Debtor and Creditor Law will hereinafter be referred to as \"N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law\". The New York Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (\"NYUVT\") replaced the New York Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (\"NYUFC\") and became effective on April 4, 2020 and applies to transfers made or obligations incurred on or after April 4, 2020. With respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, the Trustee seeks relief in this action under the NYUFC and N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278.\n\n7. The Trustee is the chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court's order entered on July 8, 2022 [Case No. 22-50073 (the \"Main Case\") Docket No. 523].\n\n8. The Defendant is a New York corporation with an address at 155 Hog Hill Road, Chappaqua, New York 10514.\n\n### **FACTS**\n\n### **A. Chapter 11 Case**\n\n9. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the \"Bankruptcy Code\") on February 15, 2022 (the \"Petition Date\") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (the \"Bankruptcy Court\"), thus commencing the above-captioned chapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\").\n\n10. On March 21, 2022, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in this Chapter 11 Case. No examiner has been appointed.\n\n11. The Debtor's bankruptcy schedules, filed in March 2022 with the Bankruptcy Court, claimed that he owned \\$3,850 in assets and had incurred hundreds of millions of dollars of liabilities.3 While the Debtor was, indeed, deeply indebted, his schedules failed to disclose the Debtor's property as held and/or transferred through his many alter-ego shell companies, including G Fashion and Lexington.\n\n12. On June 15, 2022, the Court entered a memorandum of decision and order [Main Case Docket No. 465] directing the United States Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case. Pursuant to this order, the United States Trustee selected Luc A. Despins as the\n\n3 Schedule of Assets and Liabilities, at 1 [Main Case Docket No. 78].\n\nTrustee. On July 8, 2022, the Court entered an order granting the appointment of Luc A. Despins as the Trustee in the Chapter 11 Case [Main Case Docket No. 523].\n\n#### **B. Debtor's Use of Shell Companies and Trustee's Adversary Proceedings**\n\n13. G Fashion and Lexington are among the numerous alter-ego shell companies used by the Debtor to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors.4 For years, the Debtor has orchestrated a \"shell game,\" employing a convoluted web of shell companies, nominally owned by family members, lieutenants, and/or subordinates, but in reality, controlled by the Debtor. This shell game enabled the Debtor to use and spend and/or transfer millions of dollars of cash and other assets.\n\n14. Since his appointment, the Trustee has commenced a number of adversary proceedings in the Chapter 11 Case to, among other things, establish that the Debtor's shell companies were his alter-egos and/or that such companies and their assets were equitably owned by the Debtor and in several adversary proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court has already granted such relief.5\n\n4 Default has entered against Lexington in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et. al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013 (the \"HCHK Entities A.P.\"), Docket No. 139), which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that Lexington was the alter ego of the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the HCHK Entities A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23- 5013, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Trustee has or will imminently commence an adversary proceeding against G Fashion which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that G Fashion was the alter ego of the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in such adversary proceeding.\n\n5 These include the following adversary proceedings: (i) *Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC, et al.* [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]; (ii) *Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Greenwich Land LLC, et al.* [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05005]; (iii) *Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Mei Guo* [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05008]; (iv) *Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et al.* [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05013]; (v) *Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Taurus Fund LLC, et al.* [Adv. Proc. No. 23- 05017]; (vi) *Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited* [Adv. Proc. 23-05018]; and (vii) *Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.* [Adv. Proc. 23-05023].\n\n15. The fact patterns in these litigations consistently involve: (i) Debtor-controlled shell companies held by close family members and/or subordinates, (ii) assets purchased with cash from other Debtor-controlled entities and/or transferred to and among shell entities for no consideration, and (iii) the Debtor benefiting from and having control and dominion over such assets.\n\n#### **C. Debtor's Conduct to Hinder, Delay, and/or Defraud Creditors**\n\n16. In addition to the matters addressed in the Trustee's adversary proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court has found that the Debtor was the beneficial owner of Ace Decade Limited (and through it, Dawn State Limited) and that the Debtor controlled and employed Ace Decade Limited's nominee shareholder, Yvette Wang.6\n\n17. The Bankruptcy Court has also found that the \"G Entities\" (Gettr, G Fashion, G Music, GClubs, GNews and GEdu), the New Federal State of China and the Rule of Law Foundation, as well as other purportedly independent entities and organizations, were controlled by the Debtor,7 led by the Debtor8 and/or served \"the purposes of… and as business vehicles of\" the Debtor.9\n\n18. Prior to the Petition Date, Judge Liman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, an entity originally\n\n6 *Order Granting Motion to Hold Debtor in Contempt of Corporate Governance Order,* ¶¶ 1, 4 (Jan. 24, 2023, Docket No. 1372 (\"Corp. Governance Contempt Order\").\n\n7 *Corrected Memorandum of Decision Granting in Part Motion for Preliminary Injunction*, ¶ 3 (Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032, January 13, 2023 (\"The Debtor also controls Saraca Media Group and a related entity 'GTV'\").\n\n8 *Id*. at ¶ 7 (\"The Debtor is the leader of The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF and Himalaya.\").\n\n9 *Id*. (\"The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF, GSeries, and Himalaya serve the purposes of the Debtor, serve as business vehicles for the Debtor, and their members are personally loyal to the Debtor.\").\n\nowned by one of the Debtor's chefs before its transfer to Debtor's daughter, was \"in essence, a shell corporation\" for the Debtor.10\n\n19. The Debtor has gone to great lengths to hinder and delay the collection efforts of one of his largest creditors, *i.e.*, Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P. (\"PAX\"). In 2017, PAX sued the Debtor in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the \"New York Court\"), Index No. 652077/2017 (the \"PAX Case\"), seeking judgment for monies owed. On February 3, 2021, PAX obtained a judgment from the New York Court against the Debtor in the sum of \\$116,402,019.57 (the \"PAX Judgment\"). PAX sought to enforce the PAX Judgment by levying the Debtor's assets—including the Lady May, which the Debtor falsely claimed was owned by his daughter, and the Debtor's luxury apartment in Manhattan, which the Debtor falsely claimed was held in trust for the Debtor's son. The Debtor's defiance of New York Court orders in postjudgment proceedings eventually resulted in the Debtor incurring contempt penalties of \\$134 million.\n\n20. The Debtor also used his alter egos, including G Fashion and Lexington, as personal piggy-banks, funding the lavish lifestyle to which he and his family had become accustomed, while concealing assets in these alter egos from his creditors and hindering and delaying creditors from recoveries on their claims. The transfers that the Debtor effectuated through these alter egos effectuated the Debtor's fraudulent scheme.\n\n10 *Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC*, No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL) 2021 WL 2554631, at \\*1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021).\n\n21. The Debtor has testified before the Bankruptcy Court that he has insufficient assets to pay his liabilities and that his luxurious lifestyle is funded by his family through businesses nominally held by family members.11 The Debtor scheduled only \\$3,850 in assets.12\n\n22. In March 2023, the Debtor was arrested and remains confined pending his trial on federal criminal charges of, among other things, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering.\n\n23. In its criminal indictment of the Debtor, the United States Government asserts that the Debtor and his co-defendants \"utilized more than approximately 500 accounts held in the names of *at least 80 different entities or individuals* to launder more than \\$1 billion in fraud proceeds.\"13\n\n24. The property of the Debtor's alter egos, including G Fashion and Lexington, was at all times prior to the Petition Date property of the Debtor.\n\n25. At all times relevant herein, the Debtor conducted business in New York, New York, including direction of the Transfers.\n\n### **D. Transfers Made with Intent to Hinder, Delay, or Defraud Creditors**\n\n26. The Transfers at issue in this Complaint were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors inasmuch as they were all made through the Debtor's alterego shell companies operated as a part of the Debtor's shell game.\n\n11 Hearing on Debtor's Motion for Entry of Interim and Final DIP Orders (I) Authorizing the Debtor to Obtain Unsecured, Subordinated Postpetition Financing and (II) Scheduling Interim and Final Hearings, and (III) Granting Related Relief (Main Case, April 27, 2022)\n\n12 *See* n.3\n\n13 *See* Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Yanping Wang's Motion for Pretrial Release at 29, attached as Exhibit B in the Reply of Chapter 11 Trustee to G Club Operations LLC's Supplemental Objection to Trustee's Motion to Compel and Request for Related Relief (June 23, 2023, Main Case Docket No. 1934).\n\n27. The Debtor intentionally orchestrated his financial affairs in this manner in order to conceal and dissipate millions of dollars in assets while falsely pleading poverty to his many creditors. The Debtor claimed to be destitute while simultaneously spending heavily to maintain a billionaire lifestyle for himself and for his family members and close associates.\n\n28. The assets concealed and dissipated by the Debtor included funds that he obtained from the victims of his cryptocurrency, securities, and other fraud schemes. As a result of this conduct, the Debtor faces multiple felony fraud, money laundering, and racketeering charges in a criminal case pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. *See United States v. Ho Wan Kwok*, case no. 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.).\n\n29. The Debtor knew and intended that by concealing and dissipating his assets in this manner there would not be sufficient assets remaining to repay his creditors—including the many victims of his frauds. These transfers were thus necessarily made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors.\n\n#### **E. Transfers to the Defendant**\n\n30. Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor, using his alter ego shell companies including G Fashion and Lexington, or otherwise, transferred the Debtor's property to the Defendant (collectively, the \"Transfers\"), including, without limitation, as follows:\n\nSee **SCHEDULE A** attached hereto and made a part hereof.\n\n31. At the time of the Transfers, the Debtor had outstanding obligations to creditors of the Debtor's estate.\n\n32. The Defendant was the initial transferee of the Transfers.\n\n#### **FIRST CLAIM**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n33. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-32 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n34. The Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, G Fashion and Lexington, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n35. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Transfers were effectuated using alter-ego shell companies;\n\nb. The Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n36. The Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n9\n\n### **SECOND CLAIM**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n37. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-32 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n38. The Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter ego companies, G Fashion and Lexington, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n39. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nTransfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n- a. The Transfers were effectuated using alter-ego shell companies;\n- b. The Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n- c. The Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he\n\ncontrolled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n40. The Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n*[Remainder of Page is Intentionally Left Blank]*\n\n#### **PRAYER FOR RELIEF**\n\nWHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Trustee respectfully requests that judgment be entered as follows:\n\n1. On the First Claim, an order declaring that the Transfers in an amount not less than \\$225,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from the Defendant for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n2. On the Second Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Transfers in an amount not less than \\$225,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276; (b) an order directing that the Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from the Defendant for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code\n\n3. Awarding the Trustee pre-judgment interest at the maximum legal rate from the date of the filing of this Complaint to the date of judgment herein; and\n\n4. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just, proper, or equitable under the circumstances.\n\n#### [*Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank*]\n\nDated: February 10, 2024 New Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: /s/ Douglas S. Skalka \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_*\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_* Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 dskalka@npmlaw.com plinsey@npmlaw.com *Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n## **SCHEDULE A**\n\n# **FILED UNDER SEAL**","body_zh":"B1040（表格 1040）（12/15）\n\n对抗程序封面页\n（背面说明） 对抗程序编号\n（仅供法院使用）\n\n原告 被告\n律师（律所名称、地址和电话号码） 律师\n（如已知）\n当事人（仅勾选一个方框）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国受托人/破产管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人 当事人（仅勾选一个方框）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国受托人/破产管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人\n诉因\n（简要说明诉因，包括所涉全部美国法令）\n诉讼性质\n（最多勾选五（5）个方框，以主要诉因为 1、第一备选诉因为 2、第二备选诉因为 3，依此类推。）\nFRBP 7001(1) – 金钱/财产返还\n□\n11—金钱/财产返还—§542 财产交付\n□\n12—金钱/财产返还—§547 优先受偿\n□\n13—金钱/财产返还—§548 欺诈性转让\n□\n14—金钱/财产返还—其他\nFRBP 7001(2) – 留置权的有效性、优先权或范围\n□\n21—留置权或其他财产权益的有效性、优先权或范围 FRBP 7001(6) – 可免责性（续）\n□\n61—可免责性—§523(a)(5)，家庭扶养\n□\n68—可免责性—§523(a)(6)，故意且恶意的损害\n□\n63—可免责性—§523(a)(8)，学生贷款\n□\n64—可免责性—§523(a)(15)，离婚或分居义务\n（家庭扶养除外）\n□\n65—可免责性—其他\nFRBP 7001(3) – 批准出售财产\n□\n31—批准出售破产财产及共有人的财产—§363(h) FRBP 7001(7) – 禁令救济\n□\n71—禁令救济—施加中止\n□\n72—禁令救济—其他\nFRBP 7001(4) – 对免责提出异议/撤销免责\n□\n41—对免责提出异议/撤销免责—§727(c),(d),(e) FRBP 7001(8) 债权或权益次位化\n□\n81—债权或权益次位化\nFRBP 7001(5) – 撤销确认\n□\n51—撤销确认 FRBP 7001(9) 确认判决\n□\n91—确认判决\nFRBP 7001(6) – 可免责性\n□\n66—可免责性—§523(a)(1),(14),(14A) 优先税款债权\n□\n62—可免责性—§523(a)(2)，虚假借口、虚假陈述、\n实际欺诈\n□\n67—可免责性—§523(a)(4)，作为受托人的欺诈、侵占、盗窃\n（续见下一栏） FRBP 7001(10) 对移送诉讼的裁定\n□\n01—对移送的债权或诉因的裁定\n其他\n□\nSS-SIPA 案件—15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.\n□\n02—其他（例如，如与破产案件无关本应在州法院提起的其他诉讼）\n□ 如本案涉及州法实体争议，请勾选 □ 如主张本案为依 FRCP 23 提起的集体诉讼，请勾选\n□ 如起诉状中请求陪审团审判，请勾选 请求金额 $\n请求的其他救济\nB1040（表格 1040）（12/15）\n\n本对抗程序所产生的破产案件\n\n债务人姓名 破产案件编号\n案件审理地区 分庭办公室 法官姓名\n相关对抗程序（如有）\n原告 被告 对抗\n程序编号\n对抗程序审理地区 分庭办公室 法官姓名\n律师（或原告）签名\n日期 律师（或原告）正楷姓名\n说明\n\n破产案件的提交在破产法院管辖下设立一项“破产财产集合”，其由债务人的全部财产构成，无论该等财产位于何处。由于破产财产集合范围广泛且法院管辖权极为宽泛，可能就该财产集合的财产或财产权利发生诉讼。还可能发生有关债务人免责的诉讼。如该等诉讼在破产法院提起，称为对抗程序。\n\n提交对抗程序的一方还必须填写并提交表格 1040，即对抗程序封面页，除非该方通过法院的案件管理/电子案件提交系统（CM/ECF）以电子方式提交对抗程序。（CM/ECF 在提交过程中采集表格 1040 上的信息。）填写完成后，封面页概述对抗程序的基本信息。法院书记员需要该等信息以处理对抗程序并编制所需的法院活动统计报告。\n\n封面页及其所载信息不替代或补充法律、《破产规则》或法院地方法规所要求提交和送达的诉状或其他文件。该封面页大部分内容不言自明，必须由原告的律师填写（如原告未由律师代理，则由原告填写）。每份提交的起诉状均须向书记员另行提交一份封面页。\n\n原告和被告。请完全按照起诉状中所载内容填写原告和被告姓名。\n\n律师。如已知，请填写律师姓名和地址。\n\n当事人。请在第一栏为原告勾选最适当的方框，并在第二栏为被告勾选最适当的方框。\n\n请求金额。填写起诉状中请求的美元金额。\n\n签名。本封面页必须由登记律师在表格第二页的方框内签署。如原告由律师事务所代理，必须由该所成员签署。如原告自行诉讼，即未由律师代理，则必须由原告签署。\n美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院布里奇波特分庭\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n\n关于： ：\n：\n第 11 章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等人， ：\n：\n案件编号 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。\n\n（联合管理）\n：\nx\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第 11 章\n受托人，\n原告，\n诉 ：\n：\n：\n：\n对抗程序编号 [ ]\n：\n：\nSTYLE EYES INC.（商号为 GINGER FINDS）， ：\n：\n2024 年 2 月 10 日\n\n被告。\n\nx\n第 11 章受托人为依据《破产法典》第 544、548 和 550 条以及《纽约债务人与债权人法》第 273、274 和 276 条撤销及追回欺诈性转让并请求相关救济而提出的起诉状\n\nLuc A. Despins，以在 Ho Wan Kwok（“债务人”或“Kwok”）第 11 章案件（“第 11 章案件”）中获任命的第 11 章受托人（“受托人”）身份，针对被告 Style Eyes Inc. d/b/a Ginger Finds（“被告”）提交本对抗起诉状（“起诉状”），陈述如下：\n\n1 本第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）以及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 和 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，c/o Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 破产财产集合的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\n诉讼性质\n\n1. 受托人提起本对抗程序，以撤销并追回在本第 11 章案件开始之前对债务人财产作出的转让。\n\n2. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司 G Fashion 和 Lexington Property & Staffing, Inc.（“Lexington”），在申请日（定义如下）之前向作为初始受让人的被告转让了 $225,000.00 的资金。\n\n3. 这些转让构成实际欺诈性转让，因为债务人作为其“空壳游戏”的一部分实施该等转让，且该等转让系出于阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图作出。\n\n管辖权和审判地\n\n4. 本法院依据 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) 对本对抗程序具有事项管辖权。\n\n5. 本对抗程序依据 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) 移送本法院审理。\n\n6. 本文所请求救济的法定依据包括《美国法典》第 11 编（“破产法典”）第 544、548 和 550 条，以及《纽约债务人与债权人法》第 273、274 和 276 条2，或其他适用的州法等同规定。\n\n当事人\n\n2 此后，对《纽约债务人与债权人法》的所有法条引用均称为“N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law”。《纽约统一可撤销交易法》（“NYUVT”）取代了《纽约统一欺诈性让与法》（“NYUFC”），并于 2020 年 4 月 4 日生效，适用于在 2020 年 4 月 4 日当日或之后作出的转让或承担的义务。对于 2020 年 4 月 4 日之前的转让，受托人在本诉讼中依据 NYUFC 及 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条请求救济。\n\n7. 受托人系依据破产法院于 2022 年 7 月 8 日作出的命令，在第 11 章案件中担任第 11 章受托人[案件编号 22-50073（“主案”）案卷编号 523]。\n\n8. 被告是一家纽约公司，地址为 155 Hog Hill Road, Chappaqua, New York 10514。\n\n事实\n\nA. 第 11 章案件\n\n9. 债务人于 2022 年 2 月 15 日（“申请日”）向美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院（“破产法院”）自愿提交了根据《美国法典》第 11 编（“破产法典”）第 11 章请求救济的申请，从而启动了上述标题所列第 11 章案件（“第 11 章案件”）。\n\n10. 2022 年 3 月 21 日，美国受托人办公室在本第 11 章案件中任命了无担保债权人正式委员会。尚未任命审查员。\n\n11. 债务人于 2022 年 3 月向破产法院提交的破产财产清单称，其拥有 $3,850 的资产，并已产生数亿美元的负债。3 债务人确实负债累累，但其财产清单未披露债务人通过其众多另我空壳公司，包括 G Fashion 和 Lexington，持有和/或转让的财产。\n\n12. 2022 年 6 月 15 日，法院作出决定备忘录和命令[主案件卷编号 465]，指示美国受托人在第 11 章案件中任命一名第 11 章受托人。根据该命令，美国受托人选定 Luc A. Despins 为受托人。2022 年 7 月 8 日，法院作出命令，批准任命 Luc A. Despins 为第 11 章案件的受托人[主案件卷编号 523]。\n\n3 资产和负债清单，第 1 页[主案件卷编号 78]。\n\nB. 债务人使用空壳公司及受托人的对抗程序\n\n13. G Fashion 和 Lexington 是债务人为阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人而使用的众多另我空壳公司中的两家。4 多年来，债务人一直策划一场“空壳游戏”，利用由家庭成员、亲信和/或下属名义持有、但实际上由债务人控制的复杂空壳公司网络。该空壳游戏使债务人得以使用、支出和/或转让数百万美元现金及其他资产。\n\n14. 自获任命以来，受托人在第 11 章案件中提起了多项对抗程序，以实现包括确认债务人的空壳公司系其另我和/或该等公司及其资产在衡平法上归债务人所有在内的目的；在若干对抗程序中，破产法院已经准予该等救济。5\n\n4 在对抗程序 Despins v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et. al.（对抗程序编号 23-5013（“HCHK Entities A.P.”），案卷编号 139）中，Lexington 已被作出缺席裁定；该对抗程序请求的救济包括确认 Lexington 为债务人的另我的确认判决。受托人通过引用将受托人在 HCHK Entities A.P. 中提交的起诉状（对抗程序编号 23-5013，案卷编号 1）纳入本文。\n\n受托人已提起或将立即针对 G Fashion 提起一项对抗程序；该对抗程序请求的救济包括确认 G Fashion 为债务人的另我的确认判决。受托人通过引用将受托人在该对抗程序中提交的起诉状纳入本文。\n\n5 这些对抗程序包括如下各项：(i) 第11章受托人卢克·A·德斯潘（Luc A. Despins）诉 HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC（HK International Funds Investments（美国）有限公司）等案 [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]；(ii) 第11章受托人卢克·A·德斯潘诉 Greenwich Land LLC（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）等案 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05005]；(iii) 第11章受托人卢克·A·德斯潘诉梅果（Mei Guo）案 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05008]；(iv) 第11章受托人卢克·A·德斯潘诉 HCHK Technologies, Inc.（HCHK 科技公司）等案 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05013]；(v) 第11章受托人卢克·A·德斯潘诉 Taurus Fund LLC（金牛基金有限责任公司）等案 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05017]；(vi) 第11章受托人卢克·A·德斯潘诉 Golden Spring (New York) Limited（黄金之泉〔纽约〕有限公司）案 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05018]；以及 (vii) 第11章受托人卢克·A·德斯潘诉 Lamp Capital LLC（灯资本有限责任公司）等案 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05023]。\n\n15. 这些诉讼中的事实模式一贯包括：(i) 由近亲和/或下属持有的、受债务人控制的空壳公司，(ii) 使用来自其他受债务人控制实体的现金购买的资产，和/或无对价转让给空壳实体及在空壳实体之间转让的资产，以及 (iii) 债务人从该等资产中受益，并对该等资产拥有控制权和支配权。\n\nC. 债务人为阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债权人所实施的行为\n\n16. 除受托人对抗程序中所涉及的事项外，破产法院还认定，债务人是 Ace Decade Limited（十年王牌有限公司）（并经由该公司，Dawn State Limited（黎明州有限公司））的实益所有人，且债务人控制并利用了 Ace Decade Limited 的名义股东王雪婷（Yvette Wang）。6\n\n17. 破产法院还认定，“G Entities”（G 实体）（Gettr、G Fashion、G Music、GClubs、GNews 及 GEdu）、New Federal State of China（中国新联邦国）和 Rule of Law Foundation（法治基金会），以及其他表面上独立的实体和组织，均受债务人控制，7 由债务人领导，8 和/或服务于债务人的“宗旨……并作为其商业载体”。9\n\n18. 在申请日之前，United States District Court for the Southern District of New York（纽约南区联邦地区法院）的利曼法官（Judge Liman）认定，Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方盈利有限公司）这一实体在转让给债务人的女儿之前最初由债务人的一名厨师所有，该实体“实质上是”债务人的一家空壳公司。10\n\n6 准许动议并认定债务人藐视公司治理命令的裁定，¶¶ 1, 4 (Jan. 24, 2023, Docket No. 1372 (\"Corp. Governance Contempt Order\"))。\n\n7 经更正的部分准许初步禁令动议的决定备忘录，¶ 3 (Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032, January 13, 2023 (\"The Debtor also controls Saraca Media Group and a related entity 'GTV'\")。\n\n8 同上，第 ¶ 7 段（“债务人是 The Whistleblower Movement、NFSC、ROLF 和 Himalaya 的领导人。”）。\n\n9 同上（“The Whistleblower Movement、NFSC、ROLF、GSeries 和 Himalaya 服务于债务人的宗旨，作为债务人的商业载体，其成员对债务人个人忠诚。”）。\n\n19. 债务人不遗余力地阻碍和拖延其最大债权人之一，即 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金，L.P.；“PAX”）的追偿工作。2017年，PAX 在 Supreme Court of the State of New York（纽约州最高法院）（以下简称“纽约法院”）提起针对债务人的诉讼，Index No. 652077/2017（以下简称“PAX 案件”），请求就应付欠款作出判决。2021年2月3日，PAX 从纽约法院取得针对债务人的判决，金额为 $116,402,019.57（以下简称“PAX 判决”）。PAX 试图通过扣押债务人的资产来执行 PAX 判决——包括 Lady May（梅夫人号），债务人虚假声称其归债务人的女儿所有；以及债务人在曼哈顿的豪华公寓，债务人虚假声称该公寓为债务人的儿子以信托方式持有。债务人在判决后程序中违抗纽约法院命令，最终导致债务人被处以 $134 million 的藐视法庭罚金。\n\n20. 债务人还将其替身实体，包括 G Fashion（G 时尚）和 Lexington（列克星敦），用作个人钱库，为其本人及其家人已习以为常的奢华生活方式提供资金，同时将资产隐匿于这些替身实体中以躲避其债权人，并阻碍和拖延债权人就其债权获得追偿。债务人通过这些替身实体实施的转让，促成了债务人的欺诈计划。\n\n10 Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC, No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL) 2021 WL 2554631, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021).\n\n21. 债务人已在破产法院作证称，其资产不足以清偿其负债，且其奢华生活方式由其家人通过名义上由家庭成员持有的企业提供资金。11 债务人仅在财产清单中列示 $3,850 的资产。12\n\n22. 2023年3月，债务人被捕，并一直被羁押，等待就包括电信欺诈、证券欺诈和洗钱在内的联邦刑事指控接受审判。\n\n23. 美国政府在对债务人的刑事起诉书中主张，债务人及其共同被告“利用以至少80个不同实体或个人名义持有的超过约500个账户，对超过 $1 billion 的欺诈所得进行洗钱”。13\n\n24. 债务人的替身实体的财产，包括 G Fashion 和 Lexington 的财产，在申请日之前的任何时候均为债务人的财产。\n\n25. 在与本案相关的所有期间内，债务人在纽约州纽约市从事商业活动，包括指挥该等转让。\n\nD. 为阻碍、拖延或欺诈债权人而作出的转让\n\n26. 本起诉状所涉转让，均系通过作为债务人空壳游戏一部分而运作的债务人替身空壳公司作出，因而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图。\n\n11 关于债务人提出的以下动议之听证：作出临时及最终 DIP 命令，(I) 授权债务人取得无担保、次级的申请后融资，及 (II) 安排临时及最终听证，并 (III) 准予相关救济（主案，April 27, 2022）\n\n12 见脚注3\n\n13 见 United States of America（美利坚合众国）反对被告王艳萍（Yanping Wang）审前释放动议的法律备忘录，第29页，该备忘录作为附件B附于第11章受托人就 G Club Operations LLC（G Club 运营有限责任公司）对受托人强制履行动议及相关救济请求提出的补充异议所作答复中（June 23, 2023, Main Case Docket No. 1934）。\n\n27. 债务人故意以此种方式安排其财务事务，以便在向其众多债权人虚假声称贫困的同时，隐匿并挥霍数百万美元资产。债务人声称自己一贫如洗，同时却大肆挥霍，为其本人、其家庭成员及亲密同事维持亿万富翁式的生活方式。\n\n28. 债务人隐匿和挥霍的资产包括其从加密货币、证券及其他欺诈计划的受害人处取得的资金。由于该等行为，债务人在纽约南区联邦地区法院待决的一起刑事案件中面临多项重罪欺诈、洗钱和敲诈勒索指控。见 United States v. Ho Wan Kwok（美利坚合众国诉郭文贵）, case no. 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.)。\n\n29. 债务人明知并意图通过以此种方式隐匿和挥霍其资产，将不会留下足够资产来偿还其债权人——包括其欺诈行为的众多受害人。因此，该等转让必然是为阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人的债权人而作出的。\n\nE. 向被告作出的转让\n\n30. 在申请日之前，债务人通过包括 G Fashion 和 Lexington 在内的替身空壳公司，或以其他方式，将债务人的财产转让给被告（统称“该等转让”），包括但不限于如下：\n\n见随附并构成本文件一部分的附表A。\n\n31. 在作出该等转让时，债务人对其破产财产的债权人负有未清偿债务。\n\n32. 被告是该等转让的初始受让人。\n\n第一项请求\n\n（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条及第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n33. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至32段所载的指控，如同在本文件中完整列明。\n\n34. 债务人通过其替身实体 G Fashion 和 Lexington 作出该等转让时，具有实际阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图。\n\n35. 债务人在实施该等转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. 该等转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 该等转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. 该等转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家庭成员及其控制的其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 该等转让通过使债务人可从其欺诈行为中受益而不使其财产受其债权人追及，推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 该等转让通过使债务人可从其欺诈行为中获利而不使其财产受其债权人追及，推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在作出该等转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在作出该等转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n36. 该等转让可由受托人根据《破产法典》第548(a)(i)(A)条撤销，并可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条追回。\n\n第二项请求\n\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273、274及276条，以及《破产法典》第544(b)条及第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n37. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至32段所载的指控，如同在本文件中完整列明。\n\n38. 债务人通过其替身公司 G Fashion 和 Lexington 作出该等转让时，具有实际阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图。\n\n39. 债务人在实施该等转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. 该等转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 该等转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. 该等转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家庭成员及其控制的其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 该等转让通过使债务人可从其欺诈行为中受益而不使其财产受其债权人追及，推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 该等转让通过使债务人可从其欺诈行为中获利而不使其财产受其债权人追及，推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在作出该等转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在作出该等转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n40. 该等转让可由受托人根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(1)、274及276条及《破产法典》第544(b)条撤销，并可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条追回。\n\n[本页余下部分有意留白]\n\n救济请求\n\n因此，基于上述理由，受托人谨请求作出如下判决：\n\n1. 就第一项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $225,000.00 的该等转让根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销该等转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人破产财产的利益，向被告追回该等转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n2. 就第二项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 根据《破产法典》第544(b)条及 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，金额不少于 \\$225,000.00 的该等转移应予撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等转移；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 及《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从被告处追回该等转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值。\n\n3. 判给受托人自提交本起诉状之日起至本案判决之日止按最高法定利率计算的判决前利息；以及\n\n4. 法院在此情形下认为公正、适当或衡平的其他及进一步救济。\n【本页其余部分有意留白】\n\n日期：February 10, 2024\nNew Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS 第11章受托人\n\n签署人：/s/ Douglas S. Skalka\n________________*_____* Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616)\nPatrick R. Linsey (ct29437)\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\ndskalka@npmlaw.com\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n第11章受托人代理律师\n\n附表A\n密封提交\n ഇംഗ്ലീഷ്","key_entities":["Despins","Je","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","HCHK","Guo","Himalaya","Miles Guo","Yanping Wang","GTV","Saraca","GETTR","Paul Hastings","Pro Se","pro se"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":215,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":4058,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 19:04:40"}