{"id":"court_ctb_2912_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":2912,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"UNKNOWN","filed_date":null,"title":"B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15) | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET
(Instructions on Reverse)","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET
(Instructions on Reverse) | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NUMBER
(Court Use Only) | | | |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|\n| PLAINTIFFS | DEFENDANTS | | | |\n| ATTORNEYS (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone No.) | ATTORNEYS
(If Known) | | | |\n| PARTY (Check One Box Only)
□ Debtor
□ U.S.
Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin
□ Creditor
□ Other
□ Trustee | PARTY (Check One Box Only)
□ Debtor
□ U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy
Admin
□ Creditor
□ Other
□ Trustee | | | |\n| CAUSE OF ACTION
(WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF ACTION, INCLUDING ALL U.S. STATUTES INVOLVED)
NATURE OF SUIT | | | | |\n| (Number up to five (5) boxes starting with lead cause of action as 1, first alternative cause as 2, second alternative cause as 3, etc.) | | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(1) – Recovery of Money/Property
□
11-Recovery of money/property - §542 turnover of property
□
12-Recovery of money/property - §547 preference
□
13-Recovery of money/property - §548 fraudulent transfer
□
14-Recovery of money/property - other
FRBP 7001(2) – Validity, Priority or Extent of Lien
□
21-Validity, priority or extent of lien or other interest in property | FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability (continued)
□
61-Dischargeability - §523(a)(5), domestic support
□
68-Dischargeability - §523(a)(6), willful and malicious injury
□
63-Dischargeability - §523(a)(8), student loan
□
64-Dischargeability - §523(a)(15), divorce or separation obligation
(other than domestic support)
□
65-Dischargeability - other | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(3) – Approval of Sale of Property
□
31-Approval of sale of property of estate and of a co-owner - §363(h) | FRBP 7001(7) – Injunctive Relief
□
71-Injunctive relief – imposition of stay
□
72-Injunctive relief – other | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(4) – Objection/Revocation of Discharge
□
41-Objection / revocation of discharge - §727(c),(d),(e) | FRBP 7001(8) Subordination of Claim or Interest
□
81-Subordination of claim or interest | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(5) – Revocation of Confirmation
□
51-Revocation of confirmation | FRBP 7001(9) Declaratory Judgment
□
91-Declaratory judgment | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability
□
66-Dischargeability - §523(a)(1),(14),(14A) priority tax claims
□
62-Dischargeability - §523(a)(2), false pretenses, false representation,
actual fraud
□
67-Dischargeability - §523(a)(4), fraud as fiduciary, embezzlement, larceny
(continued next column) | FRBP 7001(10) Determination of Removed Action
□
01-Determination of removed claim or cause
Other
□
SS-SIPA Case – 15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.
□
02-Other (e.g. other actions that would have been brought in state court
if unrelated to bankruptcy case) | | | |\n| □ Check if this case involves a substantive issue of state law | □ Check if this is asserted to be a class action under FRCP 23 | | | |\n| □ Check if a jury trial is demanded in complaint | Demand \\$ | | | |\n| Other Relief Sought | | | | |\n\n#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| BANKRUPTCY CASE IN WHICH THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ARISES | | | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| NAME OF DEBTOR | | BANKRUPTCY CASE NO. | |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING | | DIVISION OFFICE | NAME OF JUDGE |\n| RELATED ADVERSARY PROCEEDING (IF ANY) | | | |\n| PLAINTIFF | DEFENDANT | | ADVERSARY
PROCEEDING NO. |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH ADVERSARY IS PENDING | | DIVISION OFFICE | NAME OF JUDGE |\n| SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF) | | | |\n| DATE | | PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF) | |\n\n#### **INSTRUCTIONS**\n\nThe filing of a bankruptcy case creates an \"estate\" under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court which consists of all of the property of the debtor, wherever that property is located. Because the bankruptcy estate is so extensive and the jurisdiction of the court so broad, there may be lawsuits over the property or property rights of the estate. There also may be lawsuits concerning the debtor's discharge. If such a lawsuit is filed in a bankruptcy court, it is called an adversary proceeding.\n\nA party filing an adversary proceeding must also must complete and file Form 1040, the Adversary Proceeding Cover Sheet, unless the party files the adversary proceeding electronically through the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system (CM/ECF). (CM/ECF captures the information on Form 1040 as part of the filing process.) When completed, the cover sheet summarizes basic information on the adversary proceeding. The clerk of court needs the information to process the adversary proceeding and prepare required statistical reports on court activity.\n\nThe cover sheet and the information contained on it do not replace or supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, the Bankruptcy Rules, or the local rules of court. The cover sheet, which is largely selfexplanatory, must be completed by the plaintiff's attorney (or by the plaintiff if the plaintiff is not represented by an attorney). A separate cover sheet must be submitted to the clerk for each complaint filed.\n\n**Plaintiffs** and **Defendants.** Give the names of the plaintiffs and defendants exactly as they appear on the complaint.\n\n**Attorneys.** Give the names and addresses of the attorneys, if known.\n\n**Party**. Check the most appropriate box in the first column for the plaintiffs and the second column for the defendants.\n\n**Demand.** Enter the dollar amount being demanded in the complaint.\n\n**Signature.** This cover sheet must be signed by the attorney of record in the box on the second page of the form. If the plaintiff is represented by a law firm, a member of the firm must sign. If the plaintiff is pro se, that is, not represented by an attorney, the plaintiff must sign.\n\n# **ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET**\n\n### **DEFENDANTS CONTINUATION PAGE**\n\n- 1. G Club Holdco I LLC.\n- 2. G Club Three.\n- 3. HAA Group Pty Ltd.\n- 4. Mountains of Spices Inc.\n- 5. Omicron Nutraceutical LLC.\n- 6. Rosy Acme Ventures Limited.\n- 7. BSA Strategic Fund.\n- 8. BSA Strategic Fund I.\n- 9. Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited.\n\n# **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| In re: | :
:
Chapter 11 |\n| 1
HO WAN KWOK,
et al., | :
:
Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |\n| Debtors. | :
:
(Jointly Administered)
: |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------
LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11
TRUSTEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
G CLUB HOLDCO I LLC,
et al | x
:
:
:
:
Adv. Proceeding No. [ ]
:
:
:
:
February 15, 2024
:
: |\n| Defendants. | :
:
x |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | COMPLAINT OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE SEEKING AVOIDANCE
AND RECOVERY OF FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS,
AND POSTPETITION TRANSFERS AND RELATED RELIEF
PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY CODE SECTIONS 544, 548, 549, AND 550
AND NEW YORK DEBTOR & CREDITOR LAW SECTIONS 273, 274, AND 276
Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in the |\n\nchapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\") of Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\" or \"Kwok\"), files this adversary complaint (the \"Complaint\") against defendants G Club Holdco I LLC (\"GClub\n\n1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nHoldco\"), G Club Three (\"GClub Three\"), HAA Group Pty Ltd (\"HAA\"), Mountains of Spices Inc. (\"Mountains\"), Omicron Nutraceutical LLC (\"Omicron\"), Rosy Acme Ventures Limited (\"Rosy Acme\"), BSA Strategic Fund (\"BSA\"), BSA Strategic Fund I (\"BSA Strategic\"), and Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited (\"Hong Kong\"), (collectively, the \"Defendants\"), stating as follows:\n\n### **NATURE OF ACTION**\n\n1. The Trustee commences this adversary proceeding to avoid and recover: (a) transfers of the Debtor's property prior to the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case; and (b) transfers of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate after the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case and not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or under Title 11 of the United States Code (the \"Bankruptcy Code\").\n\n2. The Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, transferred funds in the following amounts prior to the Petition Date (as defined herein) to the Defendants, as initial transferees, as set forth below (and as more fully set forth on the Schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof:\n\n- a. \\$2,500,000.00 to GClub Holdco;\n- b. \\$9,829,960.00 to GClub Three;\n- c. \\$329,990.05 to Mountains;\n- d. \\$5,504,000.00 to Rosy Acme;\n- e. \\$49,629,868.54 to BSA;\n- f. \\$10,000,000.00 to BSA Strategic;\n- g. \\$208,048.75 to Hong Kong;\n\n3. These transfers were actually fraudulent, because the Debtor effectuated them as part of his \"shell game,\" and they were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors. Alternatively, these transfers were constructively fraudulent, because they were made when the Debtor was insolvent, and the Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in consideration thereof.\n\n4. Following the Petition Date, the Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, transferred funds to the Defendants as initial transferee, as follows:\n\n- a. \\$501,977.00 to HAA;\n- b. \\$100,000.00 to Mountains; and\n- c. \\$1,632,430.00 to Omicron.\n\n5. Because these postpetition transfers of estate property were not authorized by the Court or under the Bankruptcy Code, they are subject to avoidance and recovery under sections 549 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **JURISDICTION AND VENUE**\n\n6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b).\n\n7. This adversary proceeding has been referred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a).\n\n8. The statutory predicates for the relief sought herein include sections 544, 548, 549, and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and New York Debtor & Creditor Law sections 273, 274, and 276 2 or any other applicable state law equivalents.\n\n2 All statutory references to New York Debtor and Creditor Law will hereinafter be referred to as \"N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law\". The New York Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (\"NYUVT\") replaced the New York Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (\"NYUFC\") and became effective on April 4, 2020 and applies to transfers made or\n\n### **THE PARTIES**\n\n9. The Trustee is the chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court's order entered on July 8, 2022 [Case No. 22-50073 (the \"Main Case\") Docket No. 523].\n\n10. GClub Holdco is a Delaware limited liability company with an address located at 162 E 46th Street, New York, NY 10065-7478.\n\n11. GClub Three is a California corporation with an address located at 800 N Harper Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90046.\n\n12. HAA is an Australian proprietary company with an address located at 18 Brabham Drive, Mill Park, VIC 3082, Australia.\n\n13. Mountains is a Delaware corporation with an address located at 8 The Green, Suite A, Dover, Delaware 19901.\n\n14. Omicron is a Massachusetts entity with an address located at 82 Wendel Avenue, Suite 100, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201.\n\n15. Rosy Acme is a Hong Kong entity with an address located at 20 South Bay Road, Hong Kong.\n\n16. BSA is a Cayman Islands entity with an address located at One Artillery Court, 161A Shedden Road, PO BOX MP10085, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1- 1001.\n\nobligations incurred on or after April 4, 2020. With respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, the Trustee seeks relief in this action under the NYUFC and N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278.\n\n17. BSA Strategic is a Cayman Islands entity with an address located at One Arillerty Court, 161A Shedden Road, PO BOX MP10085, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1-10001.\n\n18. Hong Kong is a Hong Kong entity with an address located at 49/F Bank of China Tower, Hong Kong.\n\n### **FACTS**\n\n### **A. Chapter 11 Case**\n\n19. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on February 15, 2022 (the \"Petition Date\") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (the \"Bankruptcy Court\"), thus commencing the Chapter 11 Case.\n\n20. On March 21, 2022, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in this Chapter 11 Case. No examiner has been appointed.\n\n21. The Debtor's bankruptcy schedules, filed in March 2022 with the Bankruptcy Court, claimed that he owned \\$3,850 in assets and had incurred hundreds of millions of dollars of liabilities.3 While the Debtor was, indeed, deeply indebted, his schedules failed to disclose the Debtor's property as held and/or transferred through his many alter-ego shell companies.\n\n22. On June 15, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court entered a memorandum of decision and order [Main Case Docket No. 465] directing the United States Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case. Pursuant to this order, the United States Trustee selected Luc A. Despins as the Trustee. On July 8, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting the\n\n3 Schedule of Assets and Liabilities, at 1 [Main Case Docket No. 78].\n\nappointment of Luc A. Despins as the Trustee in the Chapter 11 Case [Main Case Docket No. 523].\n\n## **B. Debtor's Use of Shell Companies and Trustee's Adversary Proceedings**\n\n23. The Debtor used numerous alter-ego shell companies to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors.4 For years, the Debtor has orchestrated a \"shell game,\" employing a convoluted web of shell companies, nominally owned by family members, lieutenants, and/or subordinates, but in reality, controlled by the Debtor. This shell game enabled the Debtor to use\n\nDefault has entered against HCHK Property Management Inc (\"HCHK Property\"); HCHK Technologies Inc (\"HCHK Technologies\"); and Lexington Property and Staffing Inc. (\"Lexington\") in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et. al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013 (the \"HCHK Entities A.P.\"), Docket No. 139), which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that HCHK Technologies, HCHK Property and Lexington were the alter egos of the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the HCHK Entities A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Trustee has commenced an adversary proceeding against Lamp Capital LLC (\"Lamp Capital\"), Hudson Diamond NY LLC (\"Hudson Diamond\"), Leading Shine NY Ltd (\"Leading Shine\"), which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that Hudson Diamond and Leading Shine were the alter egos of the Debtor. *See Despins v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023 (the \"Lamp Capital A.P.\")). The Court has entered judgment to the effect that Lamp Capital was the Debtor's alter ego [Adv. Proc. No. 23- 5023, Docket No. 66] and default has entered against Leading Shine [Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 13]. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Lamp Capital A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Trustee has or will imminently commence an adversary proceeding against, G Club International Limited, G Club Operations LLC, G Fashion, G Fashion International Limited, G Fashion Media Group Inc, Rule of Law Foundation III Inc., Rule of Law Society IV Inc., GFNY Inc., and Anton Development Limited, which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that these entities were the alter egos of the Debtor and/or that they and any property they nominally held was equitably owned by the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in such adversary proceeding.\n\n4 There is a pending motion for summary judgment to determine that Greenwich Land LLC (\"Greenwich Land\") is the alter ego of the Debtor in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. Greenwich Land, LLC* (Adv. Proc. No. 23- 5005 (the \"Greenwich Land A.P.\"), Docket No. 78). The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Greenwich Land A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5005, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Court has entered judgment to the effect that Golden Spring (New York) Ltd (\"Golden Spring\") was the Debtor's alter ego. *See Despins v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018 (the \"Golden Spring A.P.\"), Docket No. 35). The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Golden Spring A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018, Docket No. 1).\n\nand spend and/or transfer millions of dollars of cash and other assets—while concealing his property from creditors.\n\n24. Since his appointment, the Trustee has commenced a number of adversary proceedings in the Chapter 11 Case to, among other things, establish that the Debtor's shell companies were his alter-egos and/or that such companies and their assets were equitably owned by the Debtor and in several such adversary proceedings the Bankruptcy Court has already granted such relief.5\n\n25. The fact patterns in these litigations consistently involve: (i) Debtor-controlled shell companies held by close family members and/or subordinates, (ii) assets purchased with cash from other Debtor-controlled entities and/or transferred to and among shell entities for no consideration, and (iii) the Debtor benefiting from and having control and dominion over such assets.\n\n## **C. Debtor's Conduct to Hinder, Delay, and/or Defraud Creditors**\n\n26. In addition to the matters addressed in the Trustee's adversary proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court has found that the Debtor was the beneficial owner of Ace Decade Limited (and through it, Dawn State Limited) and that the Debtor controlled and employed Ace Decade Limited's nominee shareholder, Yvette Wang.6\n\n27. The Bankruptcy Court has also found that the \"G Entities\" (Gettr, G Fashion, G Music, GClubs, GNews and GEdu), the New Federal State of China and the Rule of Law\n\n5 These include the following adversary proceedings: (i) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]; (ii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Greenwich Land LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05005]; (iii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Mei Guo [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05008]; (iv) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05013]; (v) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Taurus Fund LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05017]; (vi) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited [Adv. Proc. 23- 05018]; and (vii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. 23-05023].\n\n6 Order Granting Motion to Hold Debtor in Contempt of Corporate Governance Order, ¶¶ 1, 4 (Jan. 24, 2023, Docket No. 1372 (\"Corp. Governance Contempt Order\").\n\nFoundation, as well as other purportedly independent entities and organizations, were controlled by the Debtor7 , led by the Debtor8 and/or served \"the purposes of… and as business vehicles of\" the Debtor.9\n\n28. Prior to the Petition Date, Judge Liman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, an entity originally owned by one of the Debtor's chefs before its transfer to Debtor's daughter, was \"in essence, a shell corporation\" for the Debtor.10\n\n29. The Debtor has gone to great lengths to hinder and delay the collection efforts of one of his largest creditors, *i.e.*, Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P. (\"PAX\"). In 2017, PAX sued the Debtor in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the \"New York Court\"), Index No. 652077/2017 (the \"PAX Case\"), seeking judgment for monies owed. On February 3, 2021, PAX obtained a judgment from the New York Court against the Debtor in the sum of \\$116,402,019.57 (the \"PAX Judgment\"). PAX sought to enforce the PAX Judgment by levying the Debtor's assets—including the Lady May, which the Debtor falsely claimed was owned by his daughter, and the Debtor's luxury apartment in Manhattan, which the Debtor falsely claimed was held in trust for the Debtor's son. The Debtor's defiance of New York Court orders in postjudgment proceedings eventually resulted in the Debtor incurring contempt penalties of \\$134 million.\n\n7 *Corrected Memorandum of Decision Granting in Part Motion for Preliminary Injunction*, ¶ 3 (Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032, January 13, 2023 (\"The Debtor also controls Saraca Media Group and a related entity 'GTV'\").\n\n8 *Id*. at ¶ 7 (\"The Debtor is the leader of The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF and Himalaya.\").\n\n9 *Id*. (\"The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF, GSeries, and Himalaya serve the purposes of the Debtor, serve as business vehicles for the Debtor, and their members are personally loyal to the Debtor.\").\n\n10 *Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC*, No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL) 2021 WL 2554631, at \\*1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021).\n\n30. The Debtor also used his alter egos as personal piggy-banks, funding the lavish lifestyle to which he and his family had become accustomed, while concealing assets in these alter egos from his creditors and hindering and delaying creditors from recoveries on their claims. The transfers that the Debtor effectuated through these alter egos perpetuated the Debtor's fraudulent scheme.\n\n31. The Debtor has testified before the Bankruptcy Court that he has insufficient assets to pay his liabilities and that his luxurious lifestyle is funded by his family through businesses nominally held by family members.11 The Debtor scheduled only \\$3,850 in assets.12\n\n32. In March 2023, the Debtor was arrested and remains confined pending his trial on federal criminal charges of, among other things, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering.\n\n33. In its criminal indictment of the Debtor, the United States Government asserts that the Debtor and his co-defendants \"utilized more than approximately 500 accounts held in the names of *at least 80 different entities or individuals* to launder more than \\$1 billion in fraud proceeds.\"13\n\n34. The property of the Debtor's alter egos was at all times prior to the Petition Date property of the Debtor.\n\n11 Hearing on Debtor's Motion for Entry of Interim and Final DIP Orders (I) Authorizing the Debtor to Obtain Unsecured, Subordinated Postpetition Financing and (II) Scheduling Interim and Final Hearings, and (III) Granting Related Relief (Main Case, April 27, 2022).\n\n12 *See* n.3.\n\n13 *See* Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Yanping Wang's Motion for Pretrial Release at 29, attached as Exhibit B in the Reply of Chapter 11 Trustee to G Club Operations LLC's Supplemental Objection to Trustee's Motion to Compel and Request for Related Relief (June 23, 2023, Main Case Docket No. 1934).\n\n35. At all times relevant herein, the Debtor conducted business in New York, New York, including direction of the prepetition transfers at issue in this Complaint.\n\n### **D. Debtor's Shell Game and Fraud Continues Postpetition**\n\n36. As of the Petition Date, all of the Debtor's property held through his alter egos became property of the chapter 11 estate. *See* 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1).\n\n37. Following the Petition Date, the Debtor, with blatant disregard for the Bankruptcy Court and his obligations under the Bankruptcy Code, continued to effectuate transfers through numerous alter-ego shell companies.\n\n38. None of these postpetition transfers were authorized by the Bankruptcy Court nor were such transfers authorized under the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **E. Transfers Made with Intent to Hinder, Delay, or Defraud Creditors**\n\n39. The Transfers (as defined herein) at issue in this Complaint were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors inasmuch as they were all made through the Debtor's alter-ego shell companies operated as a part of the Debtor's shell game.\n\n40. The Debtor intentionally orchestrated his financial affairs in this manner in order to conceal and dissipate millions of dollars in assets while falsely pleading poverty to his many creditors. The Debtor claimed to be destitute while simultaneously spending heavily to maintain a billionaire lifestyle for himself and for his family members and close associates.\n\n41. The assets concealed and dissipated by the Debtor included funds that he obtained from the victims of his cryptocurrency, securities, and other fraud schemes. As a result of this conduct, the Debtor faces multiple felony fraud, money laundering, and racketeering charges in a criminal case pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. *See United States v. Ho Wan Kwok*, case no. 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.).\n\n42. The Debtor knew and intended that by concealing and dissipating his assets in this manner there would not be sufficient assets remaining to repay his creditors—including the many victims of his frauds. These transfers were thus necessarily made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors.\n\n### **F. Transfers to the Defendants**\n\n43. Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor, using his alter-ego shell companies, *see* n.4 *supra* and appended schedules or otherwise, transferred the Debtor's property to the Defendants (collectively, the \"Prepetition Transfers\") as follows:\n\na. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 2** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to GClub Holdco.\n\nb. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 3** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"GClub Three Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to GClub Three.\n\nc. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 4A** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Mountains Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Mountains.\n\nd. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 5** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Rosy Acme.\n\ne. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 7** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"BSA Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to BSA.\n\nf. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 8** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to BSA.\n\ng. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 11** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Hong Kong.\n\n44. Subsequent to the Petition Date, the Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, *see* n.4 *supra* and appended schedules, or otherwise, transferred property of the estate to the Defendants (collectively, the \"Postpetition Transfers\"), including, without limitation, as follows:\n\n- a. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 4B** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Mountains Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Mountains by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n- b. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 13** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"HAA Postpetition Transfers\") were made to HAA by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n- c. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 14** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Omicron Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Omicron by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n45. At the time of the Prepetition Transfers and the Postpetition Transfers (collectively, the \"Transfers\"), the Debtor had outstanding obligations to creditors of the Debtor's estate.\n\n46. The Defendants were the initial transferees of the Transfers they received (as set forth herein).\n\n# **FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to GClub Holdco) Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n47. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n48. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n49. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n50. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **SECOND CLAIM**\n\n## **(As to GClub Holdco)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n51. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n52. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n53. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n54. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to GClub Holdco) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n55. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n56. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers.\n\n57. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers.\n\n58. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n59. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n60. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to GClub Holdco)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n61. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n62. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange GClub Holdco for the Prepetition Transfers.\n\n63. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers.\n\n64. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n65. At the time of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n66. The GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to GClub Three) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n67. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n68. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n69. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n70. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to GClub Three)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n71. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n72. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n73. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nGClub Three Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n74. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to GClub Three) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n75. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n76. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers.\n\n77. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers.\n\n78. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n79. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n80. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to GClub Three)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n81. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n82. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers.\n\n83. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the GClub Prepetition Transfers.\n\n84. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n85. At the time of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur,\n\nor believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n86. The GClub Three Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Mountains) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n87. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n88. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n89. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Mountains Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n90. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TENTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Mountains)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n91. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if\n\nfully set forth herein.\n\n92. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n93. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nMountains Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n94. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **ELEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n**(As to Mountains) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n95. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n96. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Mountains Prepetition Transfers.\n\n97. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers.\n\n98. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n99. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n100. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **TWELFTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Mountains)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n101. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n102. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Mountains Prepetition Transfers.\n\n103. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers.\n\n104. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n105. At the time of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n106. The Mountains Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Mountains)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n107. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n108. The Mountains Postpetition Transfers were made to Mountains by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n109. The Mountains Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n110. The Mountains Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n111. The Mountains Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n112. The Mountains Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n113. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Mountains Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Mountains plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **FOURTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Rosy Acme) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n114. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n115. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n116. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n117. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **FIFTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Rosy Acme)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n118. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n119. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n120. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nRosy Acme Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n121. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SIXTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Rosy Acme) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n122. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n123. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers.\n\n124. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers.\n\n125. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n126. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n127. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SEVENTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Rosy Acme)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n128. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n129. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers.\n\n130. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers.\n\n131. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n132. At the time of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur,\n\nor believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n133. The Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **EIGHTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to BSA) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n134. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n135. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n136. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the BSA Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The BSA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The BSA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n137. The BSA Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **NINETEENTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to BSA)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n138. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n139. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n140. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nBSA Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The BSA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The BSA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The BSA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n141. The BSA Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWENTIETH CLAIM**\n\n**(As to BSA) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n142. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1- 46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n143. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the BSA Prepetition Transfers.\n\n144. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the BSA Prepetition Transfers.\n\n145. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n146. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n147. The BSA Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **TWENTY FIRST CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to BSA)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n148. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n149. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the BSA Prepetition Transfers.\n\n150. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the BSA Prepetition Transfers.\n\n151. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n152. At the time of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n153. The BSA Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWENTY SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to BSA Strategic) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n154. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n155. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n156. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n157. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **TWENTY THIRD CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to BSA Strategic)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n158. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if\n\nfully set forth herein.\n\n159. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter\n\negos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n160. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n161. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWENTY FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to BSA Strategic) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n162. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n163. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers.\n\n164. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers.\n\n165. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n166. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n167. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWENTY FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to BSA Strategic) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n168. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n169. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers.\n\n170. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers.\n\n171. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n172. At the time of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n173. The BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n## **TWENTY SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Hong Kong) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n174. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n175. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter\n\negos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n176. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHong Kong Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego\n\nshell company;\n\nb. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n177. The Hong Kong Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWENTY SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Hong Kong) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n178. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n179. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n180. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n181. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWENTY EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Hong Kong) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n182. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n183. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers.\n\n184. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers.\n\n185. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n186. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n187. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TWENTY NINTH CLAIM**\n\n**(As to Hong Kong) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n188. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n189. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers.\n\n190. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers.\n\n191. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n192. At the time of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n193. The Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTIETH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to HAA)**\n\n## **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n194. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n195. The HAA Postpetition Transfers were made to HAA by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n196. The HAA Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n197. The HAA Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n198. The HAA Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n199. The HAA Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n200. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the HAA Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from HAA plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n## **THIRTY FIRST CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Omicron)**\n\n## **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n201. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-46 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n202. The Omicron Postpetition Transfers were made to Omicron by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n203. The Omicron Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n204. The Omicron Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n205. The Omicron Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n206. The Omicron Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n207. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Omicron Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Omicron plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n# *[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK.]*\n\n### **PRAYER FOR RELIEF**\n\nWHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Trustee respectfully requests that judgment be entered as follows:\n\n1. On the First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$2,500,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Holdco for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n2. On the Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$2,500,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Holdco for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n3. On the Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$2,500,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Holdco for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n4. On the Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$2,500,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Holdco Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Holdco for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n5. On the Fifth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,829,960.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Three for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n6. On the Sixth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,829,960.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Three for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n7. On the Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,829,960.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Three for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n8. On the Eighth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,829,960.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GClub Three Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GClub Three for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n9. On the Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$329,990.05 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Mountains for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n10. On the Tenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$329,990.05 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Mountains for the benefit\n\nof the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n11. On the Eleventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$329,990.05 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Mountains for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n12. On the Twelfth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$329,990.05 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Mountains Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Mountains Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Mountains for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n13. On the Thirteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Mountains Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$100,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Mountains Opportunity Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Mountains Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Mountains for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n14. On the Fourteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,504,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A)\n\nof the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rosy Acme for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n15. On the Fifteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,504,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rosy Acme for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n16. On the Sixteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,504,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rosy Acme for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n17. On the Seventeenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,504,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rosy Acme Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rosy Acme for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n18. On the Eighteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,629,868.54 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the BSA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n19. On the Nineteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,629,868.54 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the BSA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n20. On the Twentieth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,629,868.54 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the BSA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n21. On the Twenty First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,629,868.54 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the BSA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n22. On the Twenty Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$10,000,000.00 avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA Strategic for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n23. On the Twenty Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$10,000,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA Strategic for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n24. On the Twenty Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$10,000,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA Strategic for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n25. On the Twenty Fifth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$10,000,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the BSA Strategic Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from BSA Strategic for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n26. On the Twenty Sixth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$208,048.75 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hong Kong for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n27. On the Twenty Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$208,048.75 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from\n\nHong Kong for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n28. On the Twenty Eighth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$208,048.75 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hong Kong for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n29. On the Twenty Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that (a) the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$208,048.75 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hong Kong Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hong Kong for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n30. On the Thirtieth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the HAA Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$501,977.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the HAA Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the HAA Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from HAA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n31. On the Thirty First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Omicron Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,632,430.00 avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Omicron Postpetition Transfers be set aside;\n\nand (c) recovery of the Omicron Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Omicron for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n32. Awarding the Trustee pre-judgment interest at the maximum legal rate from the date of filing of this Complaint to the date of judgment herein; and\n\n33. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just, proper, or equitable under the circumstances.\n\n[*Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank*]\n\nDated: February 15, 2024 New Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: /s/ Patrick Linsey*\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_* Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 dskalka@npmlaw.com plinsey@npmlaw.com *Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n**(Intentionally Omitted)**\n\n## **SCHEDULE 4A**\n\n## **SCHEDULE 4B**\n\n**(Intentionally omitted)**\n\n**(Intentionally Omitted)**\n\n**(Intentionally Omitted)**\n\n**(Intentionally Omitted)**","body_zh":"B1040（FORM 1040）（12/15）\n\n对抗诉讼封面页\n（背面说明） 对抗诉讼案号\n（仅供法院使用）\n\n原告 被告\n律师（律所名称、地址及电话号码） 律师\n（如已知）\n当事人（仅选一项）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国\n受托人/破产管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人 当事人（仅选一项）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国受托人/破产\n管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人\n诉因\n（简要说明诉因，包括所涉及的全部美国法条）\n诉讼性质\n（最多编号五（5）个方框，以主要诉因为1，第一备选诉因为2，第二备选诉因为3，依此类推。）\nFRBP 7001(1) – 追回金钱/财产\n□\n11-追回金钱/财产 - §542 返还财产\n□\n12-追回金钱/财产 - §547 优先受偿\n□\n13-追回金钱/财产 - §548 欺诈性转让\n□\n14-追回金钱/财产 - 其他\nFRBP 7001(2) – 留置权的有效性、优先顺位或范围\n□\n21-留置权或其他财产权益的有效性、优先顺位或范围 FRBP 7001(6) – 可解除性（续）\n□\n61-可解除性 - §523(a)(5)，家庭扶养\n□\n68-可解除性 - §523(a)(6)，故意及恶意损害\n□\n63-可解除性 - §523(a)(8)，学生贷款\n□\n64-可解除性 - §523(a)(15)，离婚或分居义务\n（家庭扶养除外）\n□\n65-可解除性 - 其他\nFRBP 7001(3) – 批准出售财产\n□\n31-批准出售破产财产及共同所有人的财产 - §363(h) FRBP 7001(7) – 禁令救济\n□\n71-禁令救济 – 施加停止令\n□\n72-禁令救济 – 其他\nFRBP 7001(4) – 对解除债务提出异议/撤销解除债务\n□\n41-对解除债务提出异议/撤销解除债务 - §727(c),(d),(e) FRBP 7001(8) 债权或权益劣后\n□\n81-债权或权益劣后\nFRBP 7001(5) – 撤销确认\n□\n51-撤销确认 FRBP 7001(9) 确认判决\n□\n91-确认判决\nFRBP 7001(6) – 可解除性\n□\n66-可解除性 - §523(a)(1),(14),(14A) 优先税收债权\n□\n62-可解除性 - §523(a)(2)，虚假借口、虚假陈述、\n实际欺诈\n□\n67-可解除性 - §523(a)(4)，受托人欺诈、侵占、盗窃\n（续见下一栏） FRBP 7001(10) 对移送诉讼的裁定\n□\n01-对移送债权或诉因的裁定\n其他\n□\nSS-SIPA 案件 – 15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.\n□\n02-其他（例如，如与破产案件无关本应在州法院提起的\n其他诉讼）\n□ 如本案涉及实体性州法争议，请勾选 □ 如主张本案为 FRCP 23 项下集体诉讼，请勾选\n□ 如起诉状请求陪审团审判，请勾选 请求金额 $\n请求的其他救济\nB1040（FORM 1040）（12/15）\n\n本对抗诉讼所由产生的破产案件\n\n债务人姓名 破产案件案号\n案件审理地区 分院 法官姓名\n相关对抗诉讼（如有）\n原告 被告 对抗\n诉讼案号\n对抗诉讼审理地区 分院 法官姓名\n律师（或原告）签名\n日期 律师（或原告）正楷姓名\n说明\n\n破产案件的提交创设了一个受破产法院管辖的“财产集合”，该集合由债务人的全部财产构成，无论该等财产位于何处。由于破产财产范围如此广泛，且法院管辖权如此宽泛，可能会就该财产集合的财产或财产权利发生诉讼。也可能发生有关债务人解除债务的诉讼。此类诉讼如在破产法院提起，称为对抗诉讼。\n\n提交对抗诉讼的一方还必须填写并提交 Form 1040，即《对抗诉讼封面页》，但该方通过法院案件管理/电子案件提交系统（CM/ECF）电子提交对抗诉讼的除外。（CM/ECF 在提交过程中获取 Form 1040 上的信息。）填写完成后，该封面页概述对抗诉讼的基本信息。法院书记员需要该信息以处理对抗诉讼，并编制所要求的法院活动统计报告。\n\n封面页及其所载信息并不替代或补充法律、《破产程序规则》或法院地方法规要求提交和送达的诉状或其他文件。该封面页大部分内容不言自明，必须由原告律师填写（如原告未由律师代理，则由原告填写）。每提交一份起诉状，必须向书记员另行提交一份封面页。\n\n原告和被告。请准确按照起诉状所载填写原告和被告姓名。\n\n律师。如已知，请填写律师姓名和地址。\n\n当事人。请在第一栏为原告勾选最适当的方框，并在第二栏为被告勾选最适当的方框。\n\n请求金额。填写起诉状中请求的美元金额。\n\n签名。本封面页必须由登记在案的律师在表格第二页的方框内签署。如原告由律师事务所代理，则必须由该所成员签署。如原告自行诉讼，即未由律师代理，则必须由原告签署。\n对抗诉讼封面页\n被告续页\n\n1. G Club Holdco I LLC（G Club I 控股有限责任公司）。\n2. G Club Three（G Club Three）。\n3. HAA Group Pty Ltd.（HAA 集团专有有限公司）。\n4. Mountains of Spices Inc.（香料山公司）。\n5. Omicron Nutraceutical LLC（Omicron 营养保健品有限责任公司）。\n6. Rosy Acme Ventures Limited（Rosy Acme Ventures 有限公司）。\n7. BSA Strategic Fund（BSA 战略基金）。\n8. BSA Strategic Fund I（BSA 战略基金 I）。\n9. Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）。\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n\n关于： ：\n：\n第 11 章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等， ：\n：\nCase No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。 ：\n：\n（合并管理）\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第 11 章\n受托人，\n原告，\n诉\nG CLUB HOLDCO I LLC，\n等 x\n\n对抗诉讼案号 [ ]\n\nFebruary 15, 2024\n\n被告。 ：\n：\nx\n----------------------------------------------------------- 第 11 章受托人请求撤销\n及追回欺诈性转让、\n破产申请后转让及相关救济的起诉状\n依据《破产法典》第 544、548、549 和 550 条\n以及《纽约州债务人与债权人法》第 273、274 和 276 条\nLuc A. Despins，以 Ho Wan Kwok（“债务人”或“Kwok”）第 11 章案件（“第 11 章案件”）中获任命的第 11 章受托人（“受托人”）身份，针对被告 G Club Holdco I LLC（“GClub\n\n1 本第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 和 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，c/o Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 财产集合的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\nHoldco”）、G Club Three（“GClub Three”）、HAA Group Pty Ltd（“HAA”）、Mountains of Spices Inc.（“Mountains”）、Omicron Nutraceutical LLC（“Omicron”）、Rosy Acme Ventures Limited（“Rosy Acme”）、BSA Strategic Fund（“BSA”）、BSA Strategic Fund I（“BSA Strategic”）及 Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（“Hong Kong”）（统称“被告”）提起本对抗诉讼起诉状（“起诉状”），陈述如下：\n诉讼性质\n\n1. 受托人提起本对抗诉讼，以撤销并追回：(a) 本第 11 章案件开始前债务人财产的转让；以及 (b) 本第 11 章案件开始后未经破产法院或《美国法典》第 11 编（“破产法典”）授权的债务人第 11 章财产集合财产的转让。\n\n2. 在申请日（定义见下文）之前，债务人通过其另我空壳公司，向作为初始受让人的被告进行了下列金额的资金转让，如下所列（并如本起诉状所附并构成本起诉状一部分的附表中更详尽载明）：\n\na. 向 GClub Holdco 转让 $2,500,000.00；\nb. 向 GClub Three 转让 $9,829,960.00；\nc. 向 Mountains 转让 $329,990.05；\nd. 向 Rosy Acme 转让 $5,504,000.00；\ne. 向 BSA 转让 $49,629,868.54；\nf. 向 BSA Strategic 转让 $10,000,000.00；\ng. 向 Hong Kong 转让 $208,048.75；\n\n3. 该等转让构成实际欺诈性转让，因为债务人将其作为其“空壳把戏”的一部分实施，且作出该等转让的意图是阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人的债权人。或者，该等转让构成推定欺诈性转让，因为作出该等转让时债务人已无力偿债，且债务人未就此获得合理等值的对价。\n\n4. 在申请日之后，债务人通过其另我空壳公司，向作为初始受让人的被告进行了下列资金转让：\n\na. 向 HAA 转让 $501,977.00；\nb. 向 Mountains 转让 $100,000.00；以及\nc. 向 Omicron 转让 $1,632,430.00。\n\n5. 因为该等破产申请后对财产集合财产的转让未经法院或《破产法典》授权，根据《破产法典》第 549 和 550 条，该等转让可被撤销和追回。\n管辖权和审判地\n\n6. 本院根据 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) 对本对抗诉讼具有事项管辖权。\n\n7. 本对抗诉讼根据 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) 已移交本院审理。\n\n8. 本文所请求救济的法定依据包括《破产法典》第 544、548、549 和 550 条，以及《纽约州债务人与债权人法》第 273、274 和 276 条 2 或任何其他适用的等同州法。\n当事人\n\n9. 根据破产法院于 July 8, 2022 作出的命令 [Case No. 22-50073（“主案”）Docket No. 523]，受托人为第 11 章案件中的第 11 章受托人。\n\n10. GClub Holdco 是一家特拉华州有限责任公司，地址为 162 E 46th Street, New York, NY 10065-7478。\n\n11. GClub Three 是一家加利福尼亚州公司，地址为 800 N Harper Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90046。\n\n12. HAA 是一家澳大利亚专有公司，地址为 18 Brabham Drive, Mill Park, VIC 3082, Australia。\n\n13. Mountains 是一家特拉华州公司，地址为 8 The Green, Suite A, Dover, Delaware 19901。\n\n14. Omicron 是一家马萨诸塞州实体，地址为 82 Wendel Avenue, Suite 100, Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201。\n\n15. Rosy Acme 是一家香港实体，地址为 20 South Bay Road, Hong Kong。\n\n16. BSA 是一家开曼群岛实体，地址为 One Artillery Court, 161A Shedden Road, PO BOX MP10085, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1- 1001。\n\n2 以下对《纽约州债务人与债权人法》的所有法条引用均称为“N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law”。《纽约州统一可撤销交易法》（“NYUVT”）取代《纽约州统一欺诈性转让法》（“NYUFC”），于 April 4, 2020 生效，并适用于在该日或之后作出的转让或产生的\n\n17. BSA Strategic 是一家开曼群岛实体，地址为 One Arillerty Court, 161A Shedden Road, PO BOX MP10085, George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, KY1-10001。\n\n18. Hong Kong 是一家香港实体，地址为 49/F Bank of China Tower, Hong Kong。\n事实\nA. 第 11 章案件\n\n19. 债务人于2022年2月15日在United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut（康涅狄格联邦地区破产法院）（“破产法院”）根据《破产法》第11章自愿提交救济申请（“申请日”），由此启动本第11章案件。\n\n20. 2022年3月21日，United States Trustee办公室在本第11章案件中指定了无担保债权人正式委员会。尚未指定审查员。\n\n21. 债务人于2022年3月向破产法院提交的破产财产清单称，其拥有$3,850的资产，并负有数亿美元的债务。3 尽管债务人确实负债累累，但其财产清单未披露由其众多作为其另一自我的空壳公司持有和/或转移的债务人财产。\n\n22. 2022年6月15日，破产法院作出裁决备忘录及命令[主案卷宗编号465]，指示United States Trustee在本第11章案件中指定一名第11章受托人。根据该命令，United States Trustee选定Luc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯潘斯）担任受托人。2022年7月8日，破产法院作出命令，批准任命卢克·A·德斯潘斯为本第11章案件的受托人[主案卷宗编号523]。\n\n3 资产和负债清单，第1页[主案卷宗编号78]。\n\nB. 债务人对空壳公司的使用及受托人的对抗程序\n\n23. 债务人利用众多作为其另一自我的空壳公司，阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人。4 多年来，债务人一直策划一场“空壳游戏”，利用由家庭成员、亲信和/或下属名义持有、但实际上受债务人控制的错综复杂的空壳公司网络。该空壳游戏使债务人得以使用、支出和/或转移数百万美元的现金及其他资产——同时向债权人隐瞒其财产。\n\n在对抗程序Despins v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et. al.（对抗程序编号23-5013（“HCHK Entities A.P.”），卷宗编号139）中，HCHK Property Management Inc（“HCHK Property Management Inc（HCHK物业管理公司）”）、HCHK Technologies Inc（“HCHK Technologies Inc（HCHK技术公司）”）及Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.（“Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.（莱克星顿物业与人事公司）”）已被作出缺席判决；该对抗程序除其他事项外，请求作出确认性判决，确认HCHK Technologies、HCHK Property及Lexington为债务人的另一自我。受托人通过援引并入本文件的方式纳入其在HCHK Entities A.P.中提交的起诉状（对抗程序编号23-5013，卷宗编号1）。\n\n受托人已对Lamp Capital LLC（“Lamp Capital LLC（兰普资本有限责任公司）”）、Hudson Diamond NY LLC（“Hudson Diamond NY LLC（哈德逊钻石纽约有限责任公司）”）及Leading Shine NY Ltd（“Leading Shine NY Ltd（领耀纽约有限公司）”）启动对抗程序；该对抗程序除其他事项外，请求作出确认性判决，确认Hudson Diamond及Leading Shine为债务人的另一自我。见Despins v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.（对抗程序编号23-5023（“Lamp Capital A.P.”））。法院已作出判决，认定Lamp Capital为债务人的另一自我[对抗程序编号23-5023，卷宗编号66]，并已对Leading Shine作出缺席判决[对抗程序编号23-5023，卷宗编号13]。受托人通过援引并入本文件的方式纳入其在Lamp Capital A.P.中提交的起诉状（对抗程序编号23-5023，卷宗编号1）。\n\n受托人已经或即将对G Club International Limited、G Club Operations LLC、G Fashion、G Fashion International Limited、G Fashion Media Group Inc、Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.、Rule of Law Society IV Inc.、GFNY Inc.及Anton Development Limited启动对抗程序；该对抗程序除其他事项外，请求作出确认性判决，确认这些实体为债务人的另一自我，和/或确认该等实体及其名义持有的任何财产在衡平法上归债务人所有。受托人通过援引并入本文件的方式纳入其在该对抗程序中提交的起诉状。\n\n4 在对抗程序Despins v. Greenwich Land, LLC（对抗程序编号23-5005（“Greenwich Land A.P.”），卷宗编号78）中，尚有一项简易判决动议待决，以确认Greenwich Land LLC（“Greenwich Land LLC（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）”）为债务人的另一自我。受托人通过援引并入本文件的方式纳入其在Greenwich Land A.P.中提交的起诉状（对抗程序编号23-5005，卷宗编号1）。\n\n法院已作出判决，认定Golden Spring (New York) Ltd（“Golden Spring (New York) Ltd（黄金泉〈纽约〉有限公司）”）为债务人的另一自我。见Despins v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited（对抗程序编号23-5018（“Golden Spring A.P.”），卷宗编号35）。受托人通过援引并入本文件的方式纳入其在Golden Spring A.P.中提交的起诉状（对抗程序编号23-5018，卷宗编号1）。\n\n24. 自获任命以来，受托人在本第11章案件中启动了多项对抗程序，其中包括确认债务人的空壳公司为其另一自我，和/或确认该等公司及其资产在衡平法上归债务人所有；在其中若干对抗程序中，破产法院已准予该等救济。5\n\n25. 这些诉讼中的事实模式一贯包括：(i) 由近亲属和/或下属持有的、受债务人控制的空壳公司；(ii) 以来自其他受债务人控制实体的现金购买的资产，和/或无对价转移给或在空壳实体之间转移的资产；及(iii) 债务人从该等资产中获益并对其享有控制和支配权。\n\nC. 债务人为阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债权人而实施的行为\n\n26. 除受托人对抗程序中所涉事项外，破产法院还认定，债务人为Ace Decade Limited（并通过该公司为Dawn State Limited）的受益所有人，且债务人控制并利用Ace Decade Limited的名义股东Yvette Wang（王燕平）。6\n\n27. 破产法院还认定，“G Entities”（Gettr、G Fashion、G Music、GClubs、GNews及GEdu）、New Federal State of China及Rule of Law Foundation，以及其他表面上独立的实体和组织，均受债务人控制7、由债务人领导8，和/或“服务于……债务人的目的，并作为债务人的商业工具”。9\n\n5 该等对抗程序包括：(i) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]；(ii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Greenwich Land LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05005]；(iii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Mei Guo [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05008]；(iv) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05013]；(v) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Taurus Fund LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05017]；(vi) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited [Adv. Proc. 23-05018]；及(vii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. 23-05023]。\n\n6 批准认定债务人藐视公司治理命令之动议的命令，第¶¶ 1、4项（2023年1月24日，卷宗编号1372（“Corp. Governance Contempt Order”））。\n\n28. 在申请日之前，United States District Court for the Southern District of New York（纽约南区联邦地区法院）的Liman法官认定，Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（最初由债务人的一名厨师拥有、后转让给债务人女儿的实体）在“本质上是”债务人的一家空壳公司。10\n\n29. 债务人为阻碍及拖延其最大债权人之一Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P.（“PAX”）的追偿工作，煞费苦心。2017年，PAX在Supreme Court of the State of New York（纽约州最高法院）（“纽约法院”）以索引号652077/2017（“PAX案件”）起诉债务人，请求就所欠款项作出判决。2021年2月3日，PAX从纽约法院获得针对债务人的$116,402,019.57判决（“PAX判决”）。PAX试图通过扣押债务人的资产来执行PAX判决——包括Lady May号，债务人谎称该游艇由其女儿所有；以及债务人在曼哈顿的豪华公寓，债务人谎称该公寓系为债务人的儿子以信托方式持有。债务人在判决后程序中对纽约法院命令的蔑视，最终导致债务人被处以$134 million的藐视法庭罚金。\n\n7 更正后的部分准许初步禁令动议的裁决备忘录，第¶ 3项（对抗程序编号22-05032，2023年1月13日（“债务人还控制Saraca Media Group及一关联实体‘GTV’。”））。\n\n8 同上，第¶ 7项（“债务人是The Whistleblower Movement、NFSC、ROLF及Himalaya的领导人。”）。\n\n9 同上（“The Whistleblower Movement、NFSC、ROLF、GSeries及Himalaya服务于债务人的目的，作为债务人的商业工具，其成员对债务人个人忠诚。”）。\n\n10 Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC, No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL) 2021 WL 2554631, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021).\n\n30. 债务人还将其另一自我作为个人钱袋，在将资产隐匿于该等另一自我中、并阻碍及拖延债权人就其债权获得追偿的同时，为其本人及其家人已习惯的奢侈生活提供资金。债务人通过该等另一自我实施的转移，延续了债务人的欺诈计划。\n\n31. 债务人已在破产法院作证称，其资产不足以清偿债务，且其奢侈生活方式由其家人通过名义上由家庭成员持有的企业提供资金。11 债务人仅申报$3,850的资产。12\n\n32. 2023年3月，债务人被逮捕，并因包括电信欺诈、证券欺诈及洗钱在内的联邦刑事指控，在审判前持续被羁押。\n\n33. United States Government在对债务人提起的刑事起诉书中主张，债务人及其共同被告“利用以至少80个不同实体或个人名义持有的约500多个账户，清洗超过$1 billion的欺诈所得。”13\n\n34. 在申请日前的任何时候，债务人的另一自我的财产均为债务人的财产。\n\n11 关于债务人请求作出临时及最终DIP命令之动议的听证，该命令：(I) 授权债务人获得无担保、次级的申请后融资，及(II) 安排临时及最终听证，及(III) 准予相关救济（主案，2022年4月27日）。\n\n12 见注3。\n\n13 见United States of America反对被告Yanping Wang审前释放动议的法律备忘录，第29页，该备忘录作为附件B附于第11章受托人对G Club Operations LLC就受托人强制履行动议及相关救济请求所提补充异议的答复（2023年6月23日，主案卷宗编号1934）。\n\n35. 在与本案相关的任何时候，债务人在纽约州纽约市开展业务，包括指示实施本起诉状所涉的申请前转移。\n\nD. 债务人的空壳游戏及欺诈在申请后持续进行\n\n36. 截至申请日，债务人通过其另一自我持有的全部财产均成为第11章破产财团财产。见11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1)。\n\n37. 申请日后，债务人公然无视破产法院及其在《破产法》下的义务，继续通过众多作为其另一自我的空壳公司实施转移。\n\n38. 破产法院未授权任何该等申请后转移，该等转移亦未获《破产法》授权。\n\nE. 为阻碍、拖延或欺诈债权人而作出的转移\n\n39. 本起诉状所涉的转移（定义见本文）均系通过作为债务人空壳游戏一部分运作的、债务人作为其另一自我的空壳公司作出，因此具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图。\n\n40. 债务人故意如此安排其财务事务，以隐匿并耗散数百万美元资产，同时向其众多债权人虚假宣称其身无分文。债务人声称自己一贫如洗，却同时大肆支出，为其本人、家人及亲密同事维持亿万富翁生活方式。\n\n41. 债务人隐匿和耗散的资产包括其从加密货币、证券及其他欺诈计划的受害人处获取的资金。由于该等行为，债务人在 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York（纽约南区美国联邦地区法院）正在审理的一宗刑事案件中面临多项重罪欺诈、洗钱及敲诈勒索罪名指控。见 United States v. Ho Wan Kwok（美国诉郭文贵）, case no. 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.)。\n\n42. 债务人明知并意图通过以该等方式隐匿和耗散其资产，将不会有足够的剩余资产偿还其债权人——包括其众多欺诈行为的受害人。因此，该等转让必然是出于阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图而作出。\nF. 向被告的转让\n\n43. 在申请日之前，债务人通过其作为另一个自我的空壳公司——见上文脚注4及所附附表——或以其他方式，向被告转让债务人的财产（统称“申请前转让”），具体如下：\n\na. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表2所列申请前转让（“GClub Holdco（GClub控股公司）申请前转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体向 GClub Holdco 作出。\n\nb. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表3所列申请前转让（“GClub Three（GClub Three）申请前转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体向 GClub Three 作出。\n\nc. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表4A所列申请前转让（“Mountains（Mountains）申请前转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体向 Mountains 作出。\n\nd. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表5所列申请前转让（“Rosy Acme（Rosy Acme）申请前转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体向 Rosy Acme 作出。\n\ne. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表7所列申请前转让（“BSA（BSA）申请前转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体向 BSA 作出。\n\nf. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表8所列申请前转让（“BSA Strategic（BSA Strategic）申请前转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体向 BSA 作出。\n\ng. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表11所列申请前转让（“Hong Kong（香港）申请前转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体向 Hong Kong 作出。\n\n44. 在申请日之后，债务人通过其作为另一个自我的空壳公司——见上文脚注4及所附附表——或以其他方式，向被告转让破产财产（统称“申请后转让”），包括但不限于如下：\n\na. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表4B所列申请后转让（“Mountains申请后转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的空壳公司向 Mountains 作出。\n\nb. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表13所列申请后转让（“HAA（HAA）申请后转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的空壳公司向 HAA 作出。\n\nc. 本文所附并以引用方式纳入本文的附表14所列申请后转让（“Omicron（Omicron）申请后转让”），由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的空壳公司向 Omicron 作出。\n\n45. 在作出申请前转让和申请后转让时（统称“转让”），债务人对债务人破产财产的债权人负有未清偿债务。\n\n46. 被告系其所收取转让的初始受让人（如本文所述）。\n第一项请求\n（针对 GClub Holdco）\n依据《破产法典》sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n47. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如已在本文中完整列明。\n\n48. GClub Holdco申请前转让由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体作出，且具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n49. 债务人在实施GClub Holdco申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括下列事项在内的事实表明：\n\na. GClub Holdco申请前转让是通过作为另一个自我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. GClub Holdco申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. GClub Holdco申请前转让系债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家人以及其控制的其他副手和下属协助下实施，意图隐匿并保护资产；\n\nd. GClub Holdco申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获益，而不使其财产落入债权人可追索的范围，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. GClub Holdco申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获利，而不使其财产落入债权人可追索的范围，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX（PAX）在PAX案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n50. GClub Holdco申请前转让可由受托人依据《破产法典》section 548(a)(1)(A)撤销，并可依据《破产法典》section 550(a)追回。\n第二项请求\n（针对 GClub Holdco）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n51. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如已在本文中完整列明。\n\n52. GClub Holdco申请前转让由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体作出，且具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n53. 债务人在实施GClub Holdco申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括下列事项在内的事实表明：\n\na. GClub Holdco申请前转让是通过作为另一个自我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. GClub Holdco申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. GClub Holdco申请前转让系债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家人以及其控制的其他副手和下属协助下实施，意图隐匿并保护资产；\n\nd. GClub Holdco申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获益，而不使其财产落入债权人可追索的范围，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. GClub Holdco申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获利，而不使其财产落入债权人可追索的范围，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n54. GClub Holdco申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销，并可依据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 追回。\n第三项请求\n（针对 GClub Holdco） （依据《破产法典》sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n55. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如已在本文中完整列明。\n\n56. 债务人就GClub Holdco申请前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n57. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或因GClub Holdco申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n58. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n59. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n60. GClub Holdco申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人依据《破产法典》section 548(a)(1)(B)撤销，并可依据《破产法典》section 550(a)追回。\n第四项请求\n（针对 GClub Holdco）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n61. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如已在本文中完整列明。\n\n62. 债务人并未就向GClub Holdco作出的申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n63. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因GClub Holdco申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n64. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n65. 在作出GClub Holdco申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或有合理理由相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n66. GClub Holdco申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销，并可依据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 追回。\n第五项请求\n（针对 GClub Three） （依据《破产法典》sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n67. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如已在本文中完整列明。\n\n68. GClub Three申请前转让由债务人通过其作为另一个自我的实体作出，且具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n69. 债务人在实施GClub Three申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括下列事项在内的事实表明：\n\na. GClub Three申请前转让是通过作为另一个自我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. GClub Three申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. GClub Three申请前转让系债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家人以及其控制的其他副手和下属协助下实施，意图隐匿并保护资产；\n\nd. GClub Three申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获益，而不使其财产落入债权人可追索的范围，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. GClub Three申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获利，而不使其财产落入债权人可追索的范围，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在作出GClub Three申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在作出GClub Three申请前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n70. GClub Three（GClub Three）破产申请前转让可由受托人依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第六项诉请\n（关于 GClub Three）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276 以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n71. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n72. 债务人通过其替身实体作出 GClub Three 破产申请前转让时，具有阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n73. 债务人在实施 GClub Three 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. GClub Three 破产申请前转让系利用一家替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. GClub Three 破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. GClub Three 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分；债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施该等转让，以图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. GClub Three 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. GClub Three 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n74. GClub Three 破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第七项诉请\n（关于 GClub Three）\n（依据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n75. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n76. 债务人就 GClub Three 破产申请前转让所获对价低于合理等值。\n\n77. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已无清偿能力，或因 GClub Three 破产申请前转让而变为无清偿能力。\n\n78. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n79. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n80. GClub Three 破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第八项诉请\n（关于 GClub Three）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n81. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n82. 债务人未就 GClub Three 破产申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n83. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已无清偿能力，或债务人因 GClub 破产申请前转让而变为无清偿能力。\n\n84. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n85. 在 GClub Three 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n86. GClub Three 破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第九项诉请\n（关于 Mountains（Mountains））\n（依据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n87. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n88. 债务人通过其替身实体作出 Mountains 破产申请前转让时，具有阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n89. 债务人在实施 Mountains 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Mountains 破产申请前转让系利用一家替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Mountains 破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Mountains 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分；债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施该等转让，以图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Mountains 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Mountains 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n90. Mountains 破产申请前转让可由受托人依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十项诉请\n（关于 Mountains）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276 以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n91. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n92. 债务人通过其替身实体作出 Mountains 破产申请前转让时，具有阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n93. 债务人在实施 Mountains 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Mountains 破产申请前转让系利用一家替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Mountains 破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Mountains 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分；债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施该等转让，以图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Mountains 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Mountains 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n94. Mountains 破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十一项诉请\n（关于 Mountains）\n（依据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n95. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n96. 债务人就 Mountains 破产申请前转让所获对价低于合理等值。\n\n97. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已无清偿能力，或因 Mountains 破产申请前转让而变为无清偿能力。\n\n98. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n99. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n100. Mountains 破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十二项诉请\n（关于 Mountains）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n101. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n102. 债务人未就 Mountains 破产申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n103. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已无清偿能力，或债务人因 Mountains 破产申请前转让而变为无清偿能力。\n\n104. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n105. 在 Mountains 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n106. Mountains 破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十三项诉请\n（关于 Mountains）\n（依据《破产法》sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让）\n\n107. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n108. 债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Mountains 作出 Mountains 破产申请后转让。\n\n109. Mountains 破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n110. Mountains 破产申请后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n111. Mountains 破产申请后转让构成未经授权转让债务人第11章破产财产。\n\n112. Mountains 破产申请后转让可依据《破产法》section 549(a)予以撤销。\n\n113. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向 Mountains（Mountains）追回 Mountains 破产申请后转让，或其价值，并取得截至付款之日的利息及本诉讼的费用。\n\n第十四项请求\n（关于 Rosy Acme（Rosy Acme））\n（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n114. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n115. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让系债务人通过其另我实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n116. 债务人为实施 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实证明：\n\na. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让系通过使用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐瞒和保护资产；\n\nd. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括由 PAX（PAX）在 PAX Case（PAX案）中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n117. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，受托人可撤销 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让；并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第十五项请求\n（关于 Rosy Acme）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n118. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n119. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让系债务人通过其另我实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n120. 债务人为实施 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实证明：\n\na. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让系通过使用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐瞒和保护资产；\n\nd. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括由 PAX 在 PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n121. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code，受托人可撤销 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第十六项请求\n（关于 Rosy Acme）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n122. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n123. 债务人为 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让所取得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n124. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n125. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产所构成的资本数额均不合理地不足。\n\n126. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n127. Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让；受托人可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 撤销该等转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第十七项请求\n（关于 Rosy Acme）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n128. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n129. 债务人未就 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让取得合理等值的对价。\n\n130. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n131. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产所构成的资本数额均不合理地不足。\n\n132. 在 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n133. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code，受托人可撤销 Rosy Acme 破产申请前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第十八项请求\n（关于 BSA（BSA））（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n134. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n135. BSA 破产申请前转让系债务人通过其另我实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n136. 债务人为实施 BSA 破产申请前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实证明：\n\na. BSA 破产申请前转让系通过使用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. BSA 破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. BSA 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐瞒和保护资产；\n\nd. BSA 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. BSA 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括由 PAX 在 PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n137. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，受托人可撤销 BSA 破产申请前转让；并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第十九项请求\n（关于 BSA）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n138. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n139. BSA 破产申请前转让系债务人通过其另我实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n140. 债务人为实施 BSA 破产申请前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实证明：\n\na. BSA 破产申请前转让系通过使用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. BSA 破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. BSA 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐瞒和保护资产；\n\nd. BSA 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. BSA 破产申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括由 PAX 在 PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n141. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code，受托人可撤销 BSA 破产申请前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第二十项请求\n（关于 BSA）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n142. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n143. 债务人为 BSA 破产申请前转让所取得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n144. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因 BSA 破产申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n145. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产所构成的资本数额均不合理地不足。\n\n146. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n147. BSA 破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让；受托人可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 撤销该等转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第二十一项请求\n（关于 BSA）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n148. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载的指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n149. 债务人未就 BSA 破产申请前转让取得合理等值的对价。\n\n150. 在 BSA 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因 BSA 破产申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n151. 在BSA破产申请前转让之时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产对于该等业务或交易而言均构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n152. 在BSA破产申请前转让之时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，于该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n153. 受托人可依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及《破产法》section 544(b)撤销BSA破产申请前转让，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十二项请求\n（关于BSA Strategic）（依据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n154. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n155. 债务人通过其替身实体作出BSA Strategic破产申请前转让，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n156. 债务人在实施BSA Strategic破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让系利用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让是债务人借助其家庭成员及其控制的其他亲信和下属实施其“空壳公司骗局”的一部分，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n157. 受托人可依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)撤销BSA Strategic破产申请前转让，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十三项请求\n（关于BSA Strategic）\n（依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276，以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n158. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n159. 债务人通过其替身实体作出BSA Strategic破产申请前转让，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n160. 债务人在实施BSA Strategic破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让系利用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让是债务人借助其家庭成员及其控制的其他亲信和下属实施其“空壳公司骗局”的一部分，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n161. 受托人可依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276及《破产法》section 544(b)撤销BSA Strategic破产申请前转让，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十四项请求\n（关于BSA Strategic）（依据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n162. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n163. 债务人就BSA Strategic破产申请前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n164. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人无清偿能力，或因BSA Strategic破产申请前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n165. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产对于该等业务或交易而言均构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n166. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担，于该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n167. BSA Strategic破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十五项请求\n（关于BSA Strategic）（依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n168. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n169. 债务人未就BSA Strategic破产申请前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n170. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人无清偿能力，或债务人因BSA Strategic破产申请前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n171. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产对于该等业务或交易而言均构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n172. 在BSA Strategic破产申请前转让之时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，于该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n173. 受托人可依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及《破产法》section 544(b)撤销BSA Strategic破产申请前转让，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十六项请求\n（关于Hong Kong（香港））（依据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n174. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n175. 债务人通过其替身实体作出Hong Kong破产申请前转让，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n176. 债务人在实施Hong Kong破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Hong Kong破产申请前转让系利用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Hong Kong破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Hong Kong破产申请前转让是债务人借助其家庭成员及其控制的其他亲信和下属实施其“空壳公司骗局”的一部分，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Hong Kong破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hong Kong破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Hong Kong破产申请前转让之时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Hong Kong破产申请前转让之时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n177. 受托人可依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)撤销Hong Kong转让，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十七项请求\n（关于Hong Kong）（依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276，以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n178. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n179. 债务人通过其替身实体作出Hong Kong破产申请前转让，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n180. 债务人在实施Hong Kong破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Hong Kong破产申请前转让系利用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Hong Kong破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Hong Kong破产申请前转让是债务人借助其家庭成员及其控制的其他亲信和下属实施其“空壳公司骗局”的一部分，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Hong Kong破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hong Kong破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产可供其债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Hong Kong破产申请前转让之时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Hong Kong破产申请前转让之时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n181. 受托人可依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276及《破产法》section 544(b)撤销Hong Kong破产申请前转让，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十八项请求\n（关于Hong Kong）（依据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n182. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n183. 债务人就Hong Kong破产申请前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n184. 在Hong Kong破产申请前转让之时，债务人无清偿能力，或因Hong Kong破产申请前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n185. 在Hong Kong破产申请前转让之时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产对于该等业务或交易而言均构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n186. 在Hong Kong破产申请前转让之时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担，于该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n187. 香港申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第二十九项请求\n\n（关于香港）（依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274和276以及《破产法》sections 544(b)和550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n188. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n189. 债务人未就香港申请前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n190. 在香港申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因香港申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n191. 在香港申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所留存的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n192. 在香港申请前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或相信或者理应合理地相信其将产生在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n193. 受托人可依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274和276以及《破产法》section 544(b)撤销香港申请前转让，并可依据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第三十项请求\n\n（关于HAA（HAA公司））\n\n（依据《破产法》sections 549和550(a)请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让）\n\n194. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n195. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向HAA作出了HAA申请后转让。\n\n196. HAA申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n197. HAA申请后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n198. HAA申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n199. HAA申请后转让可依据《破产法》section 549(a)予以撤销。\n\n200. 根据《破产法》section 550(a)，受托人有权向HAA追回HAA申请后转让或其价值，并加计截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第三十一项请求\n\n（关于Omicron（奥密克戎））\n\n（依据《破产法》sections 549和550(a)请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让）\n\n201. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至46段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n202. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向Omicron作出了Omicron申请后转让。\n\n203. Omicron申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n204. Omicron申请后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n205. Omicron申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n206. Omicron申请后转让可依据《破产法》section 549(a)予以撤销。\n\n207. 根据《破产法》section 550(a)，受托人有权向Omicron追回Omicron申请后转让或其价值，并加计截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n[本页其余部分特意留白。]\n\n救济请求\n\n据此，基于上述理由，受托人谨请求作出如下判决：\n\n1．就第一项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$2,500,000.00的GClub Holdco（GClub控股公司）申请前转让依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Holdco申请前转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Holdco追回GClub Holdco申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n2．就第二项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$2,500,000.00的GClub Holdco申请前转让依据《破产法》section 544(b)及N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1)、274和276予以撤销，并且就2020年4月4日之前的转让而言，依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273、273a、275、276和278予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Holdco申请前转让；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276及《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Holdco追回GClub Holdco申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n3．就第三项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$2,500,000.00的GClub Holdco申请前转让依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Holdco申请前转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Holdco追回GClub Holdco申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n4．就第四项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$2,500,000.00的GClub Holdco申请前转让依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274和276予以撤销，并且就2020年4月4日之前的请求而言，依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273、273a、275、276和278予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Holdco申请前转让；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276及《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Holdco追回GClub Holdco申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n5．就第五项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$9,829,960.00的GClub Three（GClub Three公司）申请前转让依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Three申请前转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Three追回GClub Three申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n6．就第六项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$9,829,960.00的GClub Three申请前转让依据《破产法》section 544(b)及N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1)、274和276予以撤销，并且就2020年4月4日之前的转让而言，依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273、273a、275、276和278予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Three申请前转让；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276及《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Three追回GClub Three申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n7．就第七项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$9,829,960.00的GClub Three申请前转让依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Three申请前转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Three追回GClub Three申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n8．就第八项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$9,829,960.00的GClub Three申请前转让依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274和276予以撤销，并且就2020年4月4日之前的请求而言，依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273、273a、275、276和278予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销GClub Three申请前转让；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276及《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向GClub Three追回GClub Three申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n9．就第九项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$329,990.05的Mountains（山脉公司）申请前转让依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Mountains申请前转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Mountains追回Mountains申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n10．就第十项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$329,990.05的Mountains申请前转让依据《破产法》section 544(b)及N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1)、274和276予以撤销，并且就2020年4月4日之前的转让而言，依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273、273a、275、276和278予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Mountains申请前转让；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276及《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Mountains追回Mountains申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n11．就第十一项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$329,990.05的Mountains申请前转让依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Mountains申请前转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Mountains追回Mountains申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n12．就第十二项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$329,990.05的Mountains申请前转让依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274和276予以撤销，并且就2020年4月4日之前的请求而言，依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273、273a、275、276和278予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Mountains申请前转让；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276及《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Mountains追回Mountains申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n13．就第十三项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$100,000.00的Mountains申请后转让依据《破产法》section 549予以撤销；以及(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Mountains Opportunity（Mountains Opportunity公司）申请后转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Mountains追回Mountains申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n14．就第十四项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$5,504,000.00的Rosy Acme（Rosy Acme公司）申请前转让依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Rosy Acme申请前转让；以及(c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Rosy Acme追回Rosy Acme申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n15. 就第十五项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$5,504,000.00 的 Rosy Acme（罗西阿克米）申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 544(b) 条及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(1)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Rosy Acme 追回该等 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n16. 就第十六项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$5,504,000.00 的 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Rosy Acme 追回该等 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n17. 就第十七项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$5,504,000.00 的 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Rosy Acme 追回该等 Rosy Acme 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n18. 就第十八项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$49,629,868.54 的 BSA（BSA）申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA 追回该等 BSA 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n19. 就第十九项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$49,629,868.54 的 BSA 申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 544(b) 条及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(1)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA 追回该等 BSA 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n20. 就第二十项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$49,629,868.54 的 BSA 申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA 追回该等 BSA 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n21. 就第二十一项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$49,629,868.54 的 BSA 申请破产前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA 追回该等 BSA 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n22. 就第二十二项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$10,000,000.00 的 BSA Strategic（BSA Strategic）申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA Strategic 追回该等 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n23. 就第二十三项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$10,000,000.00 的 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 544(b) 条及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(1)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA Strategic 追回该等 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n24. 就第二十四项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$10,000,000.00 的 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA Strategic 追回该等 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n25. 就第二十五项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$10,000,000.00 的 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 BSA Strategic 追回该等 BSA Strategic 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n26. 就第二十六项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$208,048.75 的 Hong Kong（香港）申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Hong Kong 追回该等 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n27. 就第二十七项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$208,048.75 的 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 544(b) 条及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(1)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Hong Kong 追回该等 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n28. 就第二十八项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$208,048.75 的 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Hong Kong 追回该等 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n29. 就第二十九项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告（a）金额不少于 \\$208,048.75 的 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 和 276 条被撤销；对于 April 4, 2020 之前的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、273a、275、276 和 278 条被撤销；（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让；及（c）根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law 第 276 条及《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Hong Kong 追回该等 Hong Kong 申请破产前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n30. 就第三十项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$501,977.00 的 HAA（HAA）申请破产后转让根据《破产法》第 549 条被撤销；及（b）一项命令，指示撤销 HAA 申请破产后转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 HAA 追回该等 HAA 申请破产后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n31. 就第三十一项请求：（a）一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$1,632,430.00 的 Omicron（奥密克戎）申请破产后转让根据《破产法》第 549 条被撤销；及（b）一项命令，指示撤销 Omicron 申请破产后转让；及（c）根据《破产法》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Omicron 追回该等 Omicron 申请破产后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n32. 向受托人判给自提交本起诉状之日起至本案判决之日止，按最高法定利率计算的判决前利息；及\n\n33. 法院在该等情形下认为公正、适当或衡平的其他及进一步救济。\n\n［本页其余部分特意留空］\n\n日期：February 15, 2024\nNew Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（LUC A. DESPINS）\nCHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE（第 11 章受托人）\n\n签署人：/s/ Patrick Linsey\nDouglas S. Skalka (ct00616)\nPatrick R. Linsey (ct29437)\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.（NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.）\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\ndskalka@npmlaw.com\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n第 11 章受托人代理律师\n\n（特意省略）\n附表 4A\n附表 4B\n\n（特意省略）\n\n（特意省略）\n\n（特意省略）\n\n（特意省略）\n英文","key_entities":["Je","Despins","HCHK","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Himalaya","Miles Guo","Yanping Wang","GTV","Saraca","GETTR","Paul Hastings","Pro Se","pro se"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":215,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":15034,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 21:47:34"}