{"id":"court_ctb_2918_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":2918,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"UNKNOWN","filed_date":"2024-02-15","title":"B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15) | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET
(Instructions on Reverse)","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET
(Instructions on Reverse) | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NUMBER
(Court Use Only) | | | |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|\n| PLAINTIFFS | DEFENDANTS | | | |\n| ATTORNEYS (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone No.) | ATTORNEYS
(If Known) | | | |\n| PARTY (Check One Box Only)
□ Debtor
□ U.S.
Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin
□ Creditor
□ Other
□ Trustee | PARTY (Check One Box Only)
□ Debtor
□ U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy
Admin
□ Creditor
□ Other
□ Trustee | | | |\n| CAUSE OF ACTION
(WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF ACTION, INCLUDING ALL U.S. STATUTES INVOLVED)
NATURE OF SUIT | | | | |\n| (Number up to five (5) boxes starting with lead cause of action as 1, first alternative cause as 2, second alternative cause as 3, etc.) | | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(1) – Recovery of Money/Property
□
11-Recovery of money/property - §542 turnover of property
□
12-Recovery of money/property - §547 preference
□
13-Recovery of money/property - §548 fraudulent transfer
□
14-Recovery of money/property - other
FRBP 7001(2) – Validity, Priority or Extent of Lien
□
21-Validity, priority or extent of lien or other interest in property | FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability (continued)
□
61-Dischargeability - §523(a)(5), domestic support
□
68-Dischargeability - §523(a)(6), willful and malicious injury
□
63-Dischargeability - §523(a)(8), student loan
□
64-Dischargeability - §523(a)(15), divorce or separation obligation
(other than domestic support)
□
65-Dischargeability - other | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(3) – Approval of Sale of Property
□
31-Approval of sale of property of estate and of a co-owner - §363(h) | FRBP 7001(7) – Injunctive Relief
□
71-Injunctive relief – imposition of stay
□
72-Injunctive relief – other | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(4) – Objection/Revocation of Discharge
□
41-Objection / revocation of discharge - §727(c),(d),(e) | FRBP 7001(8) Subordination of Claim or Interest
□
81-Subordination of claim or interest | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(5) – Revocation of Confirmation
□
51-Revocation of confirmation | FRBP 7001(9) Declaratory Judgment
□
91-Declaratory judgment | | | |\n| FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability
□
66-Dischargeability - §523(a)(1),(14),(14A) priority tax claims
□
62-Dischargeability - §523(a)(2), false pretenses, false representation,
actual fraud
□
67-Dischargeability - §523(a)(4), fraud as fiduciary, embezzlement, larceny
(continued next column) | FRBP 7001(10) Determination of Removed Action
□
01-Determination of removed claim or cause
Other
□
SS-SIPA Case – 15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.
□
02-Other (e.g. other actions that would have been brought in state court
if unrelated to bankruptcy case) | | | |\n| □ Check if this case involves a substantive issue of state law | □ Check if this is asserted to be a class action under FRCP 23 | | | |\n| □ Check if a jury trial is demanded in complaint | Demand \\$ | | | |\n| Other Relief Sought | | | | |\n\n#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| BANKRUPTCY CASE IN WHICH THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ARISES | | | | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--|\n| NAME OF DEBTOR | | BANKRUPTCY CASE NO. | | |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING | | DIVISION OFFICE | NAME OF JUDGE | |\n| RELATED ADVERSARY PROCEEDING (IF ANY) | | | | |\n| PLAINTIFF | DEFENDANT | | ADVERSARY
PROCEEDING NO. | |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH ADVERSARY IS PENDING | | DIVISION OFFICE | NAME OF JUDGE | |\n| SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF) | | | | |\n| DATE | | PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF) | | |\n\n#### **INSTRUCTIONS**\n\nThe filing of a bankruptcy case creates an \"estate\" under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court which consists of all of the property of the debtor, wherever that property is located. Because the bankruptcy estate is so extensive and the jurisdiction of the court so broad, there may be lawsuits over the property or property rights of the estate. There also may be lawsuits concerning the debtor's discharge. If such a lawsuit is filed in a bankruptcy court, it is called an adversary proceeding.\n\nA party filing an adversary proceeding must also must complete and file Form 1040, the Adversary Proceeding Cover Sheet, unless the party files the adversary proceeding electronically through the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system (CM/ECF). (CM/ECF captures the information on Form 1040 as part of the filing process.) When completed, the cover sheet summarizes basic information on the adversary proceeding. The clerk of court needs the information to process the adversary proceeding and prepare required statistical reports on court activity.\n\nThe cover sheet and the information contained on it do not replace or supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, the Bankruptcy Rules, or the local rules of court. The cover sheet, which is largely selfexplanatory, must be completed by the plaintiff's attorney (or by the plaintiff if the plaintiff is not represented by an attorney). A separate cover sheet must be submitted to the clerk for each complaint filed.\n\n**Plaintiffs** and **Defendants.** Give the names of the plaintiffs and defendants exactly as they appear on the complaint.\n\n**Attorneys.** Give the names and addresses of the attorneys, if known.\n\n**Party**. Check the most appropriate box in the first column for the plaintiffs and the second column for the defendants.\n\n**Demand.** Enter the dollar amount being demanded in the complaint.\n\n**Signature.** This cover sheet must be signed by the attorney of record in the box on the second page of the form. If the plaintiff is represented by a law firm, a member of the firm must sign. If the plaintiff is pro se, that is, not represented by an attorney, the plaintiff must sign.\n\n### **ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET**\n\n### **DEFENDANTS CONTINUATION PAGE**\n\n- 1. Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.\n- 2. Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd.\n- 3. Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC.\n- 4. Himalaya New World Inc.\n- 5. Himalaya New York Rock.\n- 6. Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC.\n- 7. Himalaya UK Club.\n- 8. Himalaya Worldwide LS.\n- 9. HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd.\n- 10. Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC.\n- 11. MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc.\n- 12. UK Himalaya Ltd.\n\n# **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x | |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|\n| In re: | :
: | Chapter 11 |\n| 1
HO WAN KWOK,
et al., | :
: | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |\n| | :
Debtors.
:
: | (Jointly Administered) |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------
LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11
TRUSTEE,
v.
HIMALAYA AUSTRALIA ATHENA
FARM INC.,
et al., | x
:
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: | Adv. Proceeding No. [ ]
February 15, 2024 |\n| | x
Defendants. | |\n\n# ----------------------------------------------------------- **COMPLAINT OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE SEEKING AVOIDANCE AND RECOVERY OF FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS AND POSTPETITION TRANSFERS AND RELATED RELIEF PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY CODE SECTIONS 544, 548, 549, AND 550 AND NEW YORK DEBTOR & CREDITOR LAW SECTIONS 273, 274, AND 276**\n\nLuc A. Despins, in his capacity as the chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in the\n\nchapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\") of Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\" or \"Kwok\"), files this adversary complaint (the \"Complaint\") against defendants, Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.\n\n1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n(\"Himalaya Athena\"), Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd. (\"Himalaya Australia\"), Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC (\"Himalaya Boston\"), Himalaya New World Inc. (\"Himalaya New World\"), Himalaya New York Rock (\"Himalaya NY\"), Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC (\"Himalaya Shanghai\"), Himalaya UK Club (\"Himalaya UK\"), Himalaya Worldwide LS (\"Himalaya WW\"), HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd (\"Vancouver\"), Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC (\"Golden Gate\"), MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc. (\"MOS\"), and UK Himalaya Ltd. (\"Himalaya Ltd.\") (collectively, the \"Defendants\"), stating as follows:\n\n#### **NATURE OF ACTION**\n\n1. The Trustee commences this adversary proceeding to avoid and recover: (a) transfers of the Debtor's property prior to the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case; and (b) transfers of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate after the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case and not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or under Title 11 of the United States Code (the \"Bankruptcy Code\").\n\n2. The Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, transferred funds in the following amounts prior to the Petition Date (as defined herein) to the Defendants, as initial transferees, as set forth below (and as more fully set forth on the Schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof):\n\n- a. \\$105,000.00 to Himalaya Athena;\n- b. \\$155,000.00 to Himalaya Australia;\n- c. \\$179,900.00 to Himalaya Boston ;\n- d. \\$436,547.11 to Himalaya New World;\n- e. \\$105,000.00 to Himalaya WW;\n- f. \\$205,000.00 to Vancouver;\n- g. \\$305,209.27 to Golden Gate; and\n- h. \\$582,400.65 to Himalaya Ltd.\n\n3. These transfers were actually fraudulent, because the Debtor effectuated them as part of his \"shell game,\" and they were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors. Alternatively, these transfers were constructively fraudulent, because they were made when the Debtor was insolvent, and the Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in consideration thereof.\n\n4. Following the Petition Date, the Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, transferred funds to the Defendants as initial transferee, as follows:\n\n- a. \\$105,000.00 to Himalaya Athena;\n- b. \\$350,000.00 to Himalaya New World;\n- c. \\$270,000.00 to Himalaya NY;\n- d. \\$156,000.00 to Himalaya Shanghai;\n- e. \\$300,000.00 to Himalaya UK;\n- f. \\$105,000.00 to Himalaya WW;\n- g. \\$50,000.00 to Vancouver;\n- h. \\$530,000.00 to Golden Gate;\n- i. \\$694,228.13 to MOS; and\n- j. \\$160,000.00 to Himalaya Ltd.\n\n5. Because these postpetition transfers of estate property were not authorized by the Court or under the Bankruptcy Code, they are subject to avoidance and recovery under sections 549 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **JURISDICTION AND VENUE**\n\n6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b).\n\n7. This adversary proceeding has been referred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a).\n\n8. The statutory predicates for the relief sought herein include sections 544, 548, 549, and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and New York Debtor & Creditor Law sections 273, 274, and 276 2 or any other applicable state law equivalents.\n\n### **THE PARTIES**\n\n9. The Trustee is the chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court's order entered on July 8, 2022 [Case No. 22-50073 (the \"Main Case\") Docket No. 523].\n\n10. Himalaya Athena is an Australian company with an address located at 48 Piccadilly Cres. Keysborough, VIC 3173 Australia.\n\n11. Himalaya Australia is an Australian limited company with an address located at Unit 5, 27-29 Illawarra Street, Allawah, NSW 2218 Australia.\n\n2 All statutory references to New York Debtor and Creditor Law will hereinafter be referred to as \"N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law\". The New York Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (\"NYUVT\") replaced the New York Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (\"NYUFC\") and became effective on April 4, 2020 and applies to transfers made or obligations incurred on or after April 4, 2020. With respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, the Trustee seeks relief in this action under the NYUFC and N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278.\n\n12. Himalaya Boston is a Florida limited liability company with an address located at 3513 NE 171 Street, North Miami Beach, Florida 33160.\n\n13. Himalaya New World is a Virginia Stock Corporation with an address located at 12587 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 135, Fairfax, Virgina 22033.\n\n14. Himalaya NY is a New York Stock Corporation with an address located at 301 West 110 Street, Apt. 8E, New York, New York 10025.\n\n15. Himalaya Shanghai is a Delaware limited liability company with an address located at 12 Lara Lane, Wilmington, Delaware 19808.\n\n16. Himalaya UK is a Private Limited Company with an address located at 120 Baker Street, 3rd Floor, London W1U 6TU, United Kingdom.\n\n17. Himalaya WW is a Spanish limited liability company with an address located at Av De San Pablo 28, Nave 28, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.\n\n18. Vancouver is a British Columbia corporation with an address located at 201-13065 84th Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1B3, Canada.\n\n19. Golden Gate is a California limited liability company with an address located at 8371 Central Avenue, Suite B, Newark, California 94560.\n\n20. MOS is a New York Not for Profit Corporation.\n\n21. Himalaya Ltd. is a United Kingdom Private Limited Company with an address located at Spaces – The Charter Building, Charter Place, Uxbridge UB81JG, United Kingdom.\n\n### **FACTS**\n\n# **A. Chapter 11 Case**\n\n22. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on February 15, 2022 (the \"Petition Date\") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (the \"Bankruptcy Court\"), thus commencing the Chapter 11 Case.\n\n23. On March 21, 2022, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in this Chapter 11 Case. No examiner has been appointed.\n\n24. The Debtor's bankruptcy schedules, filed in March 2022 with the Bankruptcy Court, claimed that he owned \\$3,850 in assets and had incurred hundreds of millions of dollars of liabilities.3 While the Debtor was, indeed, deeply indebted, his schedules failed to disclose the Debtor's property as held and/or transferred through his many alter-ego shell companies.\n\n25. On June 15, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court entered a memorandum of decision and order [Main Case Docket No. 465] directing the United States Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case. Pursuant to this order, the United States Trustee selected Luc A. Despins as the Trustee. On July 8, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting the appointment of Luc A. Despins as the Trustee in the Chapter 11 Case [Main Case Docket No. 523].\n\n#### **B. Debtor's Use of Shell Companies and Trustee's Adversary Proceedings**\n\n26. The Debtor used numerous alter-ego shell companies to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors.4 For years, the Debtor has orchestrated a \"shell game,\" employing a\n\nThe Court has entered judgment to the effect that Golden Spring (New York) Ltd (\"Golden Spring\") was the Debtor's alter ego. *See Despins v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018 (the \"Golden\n\n3 Schedule of Assets and Liabilities, at 1 [Main Case Docket No. 78].\n\n4 There is a pending motion for summary judgment to determine that Greenwich Land LLC (\"Greenwich Land\") is the alter ego of the Debtor in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. Greenwich Land, LLC* (Adv. Proc. No. 23- 5005 (the \"Greenwich Land A.P.\"), Docket No. 78). The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Greenwich Land A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5005, Docket No. 1).\n\nconvoluted web of shell companies, nominally owned by family members, lieutenants, and/or subordinates, but in reality, controlled by the Debtor. This shell game enabled the Debtor to use and spend and/or transfer millions of dollars of cash and other assets—while concealing his property from creditors.\n\n27. Since his appointment, the Trustee has commenced a number of adversary proceedings in the Chapter 11 Case to, among other things, establish that the Debtor's shell companies were his alter-egos and/or that such companies and their assets were equitably owned by the Debtor and in several such adversary proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court has already granted such relief.5\n\nThe Trustee has commenced an adversary proceeding against Lamp Capital LLC (\"Lamp Capital\"), Hudson Diamond NY LLC (\"Hudson Diamond\"), Leading Shine NY Ltd (\"Leading Shine\"), which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that Hudson Diamond and Leading Shine were the alter egos of the Debtor. *See Despins v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023 (the \"Lamp Capital A.P.\")). The Court has entered judgment to the effect that Lamp Capital was the Debtor's alter ego [Adv. Proc. No. 23- 5023, Docket No. 66] and default has entered against Leading Shine [Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 13]. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Lamp Capital A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Trustee has or will imminently commence an adversary proceeding against, G Club International Limited, G Club Operations LLC, G Fashion, G Fashion International Limited, G Fashion Media Group Inc, Rule of Law Foundation III Inc., Rule of Law Society IV Inc., GFNY Inc., and Anton Development Limited, which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that these entities were the alter egos of the Debtor and/or that they and any property they nominally held was equitably owned by the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in such adversary proceeding.\n\n5 These include the following adversary proceedings: (i) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]; (ii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Greenwich Land LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05005]; (iii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Mei Guo [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05008]; (iv) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05013]; (v) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Taurus Fund LLC, et al., Adv. Proc.\n\nSpring A.P.\"), Docket No. 35). The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Golden Spring A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018, Docket No. 1).\n\nDefault has entered against HCHK Property Management Inc (\"HCHK Property\"); HCHK Technologies Inc (\"HCHK Technologies\"); and Lexington Property and Staffing Inc. (\"Lexington\") in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et. al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013 (the \"HCHK Entities A.P.\"), Docket No. 139), which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that HCHK Technologies, HCHK Property and Lexington were the alter egos of the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the HCHK Entities A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013, Docket No. 1).\n\n28. The fact patterns in these litigations consistently involve: (i) Debtor-controlled shell companies held by close family members and/or subordinates, (ii) assets purchased with cash from other Debtor-controlled entities and/or transferred to and among shell entities for no consideration, and (iii) the Debtor benefiting from and having control and dominion over such assets.\n\n#### **C. Debtor's Conduct to Hinder, Delay, and/or Defraud Creditors**\n\n29. In addition to the matters addressed in the Trustee's adversary proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court has found that the Debtor was the beneficial owner of Ace Decade Limited (and through it, Dawn State Limited) and that the Debtor controlled and employed Ace Decade Limited's nominee shareholder, Yvette Wang.6\n\n30. The Bankruptcy Court has also found that the \"G Entities\" (Gettr, G Fashion, G Music, GClubs, GNews and GEdu), the New Federal State of China and the Rule of Law Foundation, as well as other purportedly independent entities and organizations, were controlled by the Debtor7 , led by the Debtor8 and/or served \"the purposes of… and as business vehicles of\" the Debtor.9\n\n31. Prior to the Petition Date, Judge Liman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, an entity originally\n\nNo. 23-05017]; (vi) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited [Adv. Proc. 23- 05018]; and (vii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. 23-05023].\n\n6 Order Granting Motion to Hold Debtor in Contempt of Corporate Governance Order, ¶¶ 1, 4 (Jan. 24, 2023, Docket No. 1372 (\"Corp. Governance Contempt Order\").\n\n7 *Corrected Memorandum of Decision Granting in Part Motion for Preliminary Injunction*, ¶ 3 (Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032, January 13, 2023 (\"The Debtor also controls Saraca Media Group and a related entity 'GTV'\").\n\n8 *Id*. at ¶ 7 (\"The Debtor is the leader of The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF and Himalaya.\").\n\n9 *Id*. (\"The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF, GSeries, and Himalaya serve the purposes of the Debtor, serve as business vehicles for the Debtor, and their members are personally loyal to the Debtor.\").\n\nowned by one of the Debtor's chefs before its transfer to Debtor's daughter, was \"in essence, a shell corporation\" for the Debtor.10\n\n32. The Debtor has gone to great lengths to hinder and delay the collection efforts of one of his largest creditors, *i.e.*, Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P. (\"PAX\"). In 2017, PAX sued the Debtor in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the \"New York Court\"), Index No. 652077/2017 (the \"PAX Case\"), seeking judgment for monies owed. On February 3, 2021, PAX obtained a judgment from the New York Court against the Debtor in the sum of \\$116,402,019.57 (the \"PAX Judgment\"). PAX sought to enforce the PAX Judgment by levying the Debtor's assets—including the Lady May, which the Debtor falsely claimed was owned by his daughter, and the Debtor's luxury apartment in Manhattan, which the Debtor falsely claimed was held in trust for the Debtor's son. The Debtor's defiance of New York Court orders in postjudgment proceedings eventually resulted in the Debtor incurring contempt penalties of \\$134 million.\n\n33. The Debtor also used his alter egos as personal piggy-banks, funding the lavish lifestyle to which he and his family had become accustomed, while concealing assets in these alter egos from his creditors and hindering and delaying creditors from recoveries on their claims. The transfers that the Debtor effectuated through these alter egos perpetuated the Debtor's fraudulent scheme.\n\n10 *Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC*, No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL) 2021 WL 2554631, at \\*1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021).\n\n34. The Debtor has testified before the Bankruptcy Court that he has insufficient assets to pay his liabilities and that his luxurious lifestyle is funded by his family through businesses nominally held by family members.11 The Debtor scheduled only \\$3,850 in assets.12\n\n35. In March 2023, the Debtor was arrested and remains confined pending his trial on federal criminal charges of, among other things, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering.\n\n36. In its criminal indictment of the Debtor, the United States Government asserts that the Debtor and his co-defendants \"utilized more than approximately 500 accounts held in the names of *at least 80 different entities or individuals* to launder more than \\$1 billion in fraud proceeds.\"13\n\n37. The property of the Debtor's alter egos was at all times prior to the Petition Date property of the Debtor.\n\n38. At all times relevant herein, the Debtor conducted business in New York, New York, including direction of the prepetition transfers at issue in this Complaint.\n\n#### **D. Debtor's Shell Game and Fraud Continues Postpetition**\n\n39. As of the Petition Date, all of the Debtor's property held through his alter egos became property of the chapter 11 estate. *See* 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1).\n\n11 Hearing on Debtor's Motion for Entry of Interim and Final DIP Orders (I) Authorizing the Debtor to Obtain Unsecured, Subordinated Postpetition Financing and (II) Scheduling Interim and Final Hearings, and (III) Granting Related Relief (Main Case, April 27, 2022).\n\n12 *See* n.3\n\n13 *See* Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Yanping Wang's Motion for Pretrial Release at 29, attached as Exhibit B in the Reply of Chapter 11 Trustee to G Club Operations LLC's Supplemental Objection to Trustee's Motion to Compel and Request for Related Relief (June 23, 2023, Main Case Docket No. 1934).\n\n40. Following the Petition Date, the Debtor, with blatant disregard for the Bankruptcy Court and his obligations under the Bankruptcy Code, continued to effectuate transfers through numerous alter-ego shell companies.\n\n41. None of these postpetition transfers were authorized by the Bankruptcy Court nor were such transfers authorized under the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **E. Transfers Made with Intent to Hinder, Delay, or Defraud Creditors**\n\n42. The Transfers (as defined herein) at issue in this Complaint were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors inasmuch as they were all made through the Debtor's alter-ego shell companies operated as a part of the Debtor's shell game.\n\n43. The Debtor intentionally orchestrated his financial affairs in this manner in order to conceal and dissipate millions of dollars in assets while falsely pleading poverty to his many creditors. The Debtor claimed to be destitute while simultaneously spending heavily to maintain a billionaire lifestyle for himself and for his family members and close associates.\n\n44. The assets concealed and dissipated by the Debtor included funds that he obtained from the victims of his cryptocurrency, securities, and other fraud schemes. As a result of this conduct, the Debtor faces multiple felony fraud, money laundering, and racketeering charges in a criminal case pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. *See United States v. Ho Wan Kwok*, case no. 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.).\n\n45. The Debtor knew and intended that by concealing and dissipating his assets in this manner there would not be sufficient assets remaining to repay his creditors—including the many victims of his frauds. These transfers were thus necessarily made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors.\n\n#### **F. Transfers to the Defendants**\n\n46. Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor, using his alter-ego shell companies, *see* n.4 *supra* and appended schedules, or otherwise, transferred the Debtor's property to the Defendants (collectively, the \"Prepetition Transfers\") as follows:\n\na. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 1A** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Athena.\n\nb. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 2** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Australia.\n\nc. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 3** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Boston.\n\nd. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 5A** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya New World.\n\ne. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 10A** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya WW.\n\nf. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 11A** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Vancouver Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Vancouver.\n\ng. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 12A** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Golden Gate.\n\nh. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 14A** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Ltd.\n\n47. Subsequent to the Petition Date, the Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, *see* n.4 *supra* and appended schedules, or otherwise, transferred property of the estate to the Defendants (collectively, the \"Postpetition Transfers\") as follows:\n\na. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 1B** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Athena.\n\nb. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 5B** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya New World.\n\nc. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 6** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya NY.\n\nd. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 7** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Shanghai.\n\ne. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 8** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya UK.\n\nf. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 10B** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya WW.\n\ng. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 11B** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Vancouver Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Vancouver.\n\nh. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 12B** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Golden Gate.\n\ni. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 13** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"MOS Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to MOS.\n\nj. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule 14B** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Ltd.\n\n48. At the time of the Prepetition Transfers and the Postpetition Transfers (collectively, the \"Transfers\"), the Debtor had outstanding obligations to creditors of the Debtor's estate.\n\n49. The Defendants were the initial transferees of the Transfers they received (as set forth herein).\n\n#### **FIRST CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Himalaya Athena)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n50. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n51. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n52. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n53. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SECOND CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Himalaya Athena)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n54. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n55. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n56. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-\n\nego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n57. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **THIRD CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Athena)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n58. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n59. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers.\n\n60. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers.\n\n61. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n62. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n63. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Athena)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n64. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n65. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers.\n\n66. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent\n\nor the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers.\n\n67. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property\n\nremaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n68. At the time of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n69. The Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Athena)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n70. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n71. The Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Athena by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n72. The Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n73. The Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n74. The Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n75. The Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n76. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya Athena plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Himalaya Australia)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n77. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n78. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n79. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n80. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Himalaya Australia)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n81. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n82. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n83. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an\n\nalter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n84. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Australia)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n85. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n86. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers.\n\n87. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers.\n\n88. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n89. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n90. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Australia)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n91. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n92. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers.\n\n93. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers.\n\n94. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n95. At the time of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n96. The Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Boston)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n97. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n98. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n99. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n100. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **ELEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Boston)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n101. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n102. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n103. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n104. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWELFTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Boston)**\n\n**(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n105. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1- 49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n106. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers.\n\n107. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers.\n\n108. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n109. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n110. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Boston)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n111. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n112. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers.\n\n113. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers.\n\n114. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n115. At the time of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n116. The Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FOURTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya New World)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n117. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n118. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through\n\nhis alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n119. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an\n\nalter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n120. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FIFTHTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya New World)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n121. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n122. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n123. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n124. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SIXTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya New World)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n125. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n126. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers.\n\n127. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Property Prepetition Transfers.\n\n128. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n129. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n130. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya New World)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n131. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n132. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers.\n\n133. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers.\n\n134. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n135. At the time of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n136. The Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n**(As to Himalaya New World)**\n\n**(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n137. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n138. The Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya New World by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n139. The Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n140. The Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n141. The Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n142. The Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n143. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya New World plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **NINETEENTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya NY)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n144. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n145. The Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers were made to Lexington by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n146. The Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n147. The Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n148. The Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n149. The Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n150. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya NY plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **TWENTIETH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Himalaya Shanghai)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n151. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1- 49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n152. The Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Shanghai by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n153. The Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n154. The Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n155. The Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n156. The Himalaya Shanghai Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n157. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya Shanghai plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **TWENTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya UK)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n158. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n159. The Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya UK by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n160. The Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n161. The Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy\n\nCourt or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n162. The Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n163. The Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n164. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya UK plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **TWENTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Himalaya WW) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n165. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n166. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n167. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n168. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TWENTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Himalaya WW)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n169. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n170. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n171. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-\n\nego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n172. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TWENTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya WW)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n173. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n174. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers.\n\n175. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers.\n\n176. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n177. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n178. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TWENTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya WW)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n179. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n180. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers.\n\n181. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers.\n\n182. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n183. At the time of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n184. The Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TWENTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya WW)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n185. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n186. The Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya WW by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n187. The Himalaya WW Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n188. The Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy\n\nCourt or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n189. The Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n190. The Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n191. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya WW plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **TWENTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Vancouver)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n192. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n193. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\nThe Vancouver Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TWENTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Vancouver)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n1. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n2. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n3. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n4. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego\n\nshell company;\n\nb. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\nThe Vancouver Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TWENTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Vancouver)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n5. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n6. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers.\n\n7. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers.\n\n8. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n9. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n10. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTIETH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Vancouver)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n11. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n12. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers.\n\n13. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers.\n\n14. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n15. At the time of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n16. The Vancouver Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y.\n\nDebt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Vancouver)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n17. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n18. The Vancouver Postpetition Transfers were made to Vancouver by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n19. The Vancouver Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n20. The Vancouver Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court\n\nor by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n21. The Rule of Vancouver Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n22. The Vancouver Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n23. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Vancouver Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Vancouver plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **THIRTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n**(As to Golden Gate)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a) (1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n24. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n25. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers is shown by among other things:\n\n- a. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter ego shell company;\n- b. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtors' creditors;\n- c. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n- d. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n- e. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n- f. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers , the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n- g. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n26. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a) (1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550 (a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Golden Gate)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n27. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n28. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n29. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n30. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Golden Gate)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n31. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n32. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers.\n\n33. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers.\n\n34. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n35. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n36. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Golden Gate)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n37. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n38. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers.\n\n39. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers.\n\n40. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n41. At the time of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n42. The Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n### **(As to Golden Gate)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n43. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n44. The Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers were made to Golden Gate by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n45. The Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n46. The Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n47. The Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n48. The Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n49. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Golden Gate plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **THIRTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to MOS) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n50. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n51. The MOS Postpetition Transfers were made to MOS by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n52. The MOS Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n53. The MOS Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n54. The MOS Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n55. The MOS Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n56. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the MOS Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from MOS plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **THIRTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Ltd.)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n57. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n58. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n59. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHimalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-\n\nego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n60. The Himalaya Ltd. Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Ltd.)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n61. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n62. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n63. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n64. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FORTIETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Himalaya Ltd.) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n65. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n66. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n67. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n68. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n69. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n70. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **FORTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(As to Himalaya Ltd.)**\n\n**(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n71. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n72. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n73. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n74. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n75. At the time of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n76. The Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FORTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n#### **(As to Himalaya Ltd.)**\n\n### **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n77. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-49 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n78. The Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Ltd. by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n79. The Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n80. The Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n81. The Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n82. The Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n83. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya Ltd. plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n*[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK.]*\n\n#### **PRAYER FOR RELIEF**\n\nWHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Trustee respectfully requests that judgment be entered as follows:\n\n1. On the First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Athena for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n2. On the Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Athena for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n3. On the Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Athena for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n4. On the Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Athena for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n5. On the Fifth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Athena for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n6. On the Sixth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$155,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Australia for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n7. On the Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$155,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Australia for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n8. On the Eighth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$155,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Australia for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n9. On the Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$155,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Australia for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n10. On the Tenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$179,900.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the\n\nTrustee's option, from Himalaya Boston for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n11. On the Eleventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$179,900.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Boston for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n12. On the Twelfth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$179,900.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Boston for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n13. On the Thirteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$179,900.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Boston for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n14. On the Fourteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$436,547.11 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya New World for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n15. On the Fifteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$436,547.11 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya New World for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n16. On the Sixteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$436,547.11 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya New World for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n17. On the Seventeenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$436,547.11 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya New World Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya New World for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n18. On the Eighteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$350,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya New World Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya New World for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n19. On the Nineteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$270,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya NY transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya NY Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya NY for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n20. On the Twentieth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$156,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya NY transfers be set aside;\n\nand (c) recovery of the Himalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Shanghai for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n21. On the Twenty-First Claim (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$300,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya UK transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya UK Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya UK for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n22. On the Twenty-Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya WW for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n23. On the Twenty-Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya WW for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n24. On the Twenty-Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya WW for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n25. On the Twenty-Fifth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya WW Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya WW for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n26. On the Twenty-Sixth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$105,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya WW Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya WW for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code\n\n27. On the Twenty-Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$205,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Vancouver Prepetition\n\nTransfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Vancouver for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n28. On the Twenty-Eighth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$205,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Vancouver for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n29. On the Twenty-Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$205,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Vancouver for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n30. On the Thirtieth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$205,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Vancouver Prepetition Transfers, or the\n\nvalue thereof at the Trustee's option, from Vancouver for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n31. On the Thirty-First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Vancouver Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$50,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Vancouver Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Vancouver Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Vancouver for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n32. On the Thirty-Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$305,209.27 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Gate for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n33. On the Thirty-Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$305,209.27 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Gate for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n34. On the Thirty-Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$305,209.27 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Gate for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n35. On the Thirty-Fifth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$305,209.27 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Gate Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Gate for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n36. On the Thirty-Sixth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$530,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Gate Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Gate for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n37. On the Thirty-Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the MOS Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$694,228.13 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the MOS Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and\n\n(c) recovery of the MOS Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from MOS for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n38. On the Thirty-Eighth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$582,400.65 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Ltd. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n39. On the Thirty-Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$582,400.65 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Ltd. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n40. On the Fortieth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$582,400.65 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Ltd. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n41. On the Forty-First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$582,400.65 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Ltd. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n42. On the Forty-Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$160,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Ltd. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code\n\n43. Awarding the Trustee pre-judgment interest at the maximum legal rate from the Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just, proper, or equitable under the circumstances.\n\n44. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just, proper, or equitable under the circumstances.\n\n[*Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank*]\n\nDated: February 15, 2024 New Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: /s/ Patrick Linsey*\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_* Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 dskalka@npmlaw.com plinsey@npmlaw.com *Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n# **SCHEDULE 1A**\n\nHimalaya Athena Prepetition Transfers\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 75 of 93\n\n# **SCHEDULE 1B**\n\nHimalaya Athena Postpetition Transfers\n\nHimalaya Australia Prepetition Transfers\n\nHimalaya Boston Prepetition Transfers\n\n**(Intentionally Omitted)**\n\n# **SCHEDULE 5A**\n\nHimalaya New World Prepetition Transfers\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 80 of 93\n\n# **SCHEDULE 5B**\n\nHimalaya New World Postpetition Transfers\n\nHimalaya NY Postpetition Transfers\n\nHimalaya Shanghai Postpetition Transfers\n\nHimalaya UK Postpetition Transfers\n\n**(Intentionally Omitted)**\n\n# **SCHEDULE 10A**\n\nHimalaya WW Prepetition Transfers\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 86 of 93\n\n# **SCHEDULE 10B**\n\nHimalaya WW Postpetition Transfers\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 87 of 93\n\n# **SCHEDULE 11A**\n\nVancouver Prepetition Transfers\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 88 of 93\n\n# **SCHEDULE 11B**\n\nVancouver Postpetition Transfers\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 89 of 93\n\n# **SCHEDULE 12A**\n\nGolden Gate Prepetition Transfers\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 90 of 93\n\n### **SCHEDULE 12B**\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 91 of 93\n\n### **SCHEDULE 13**\n\nMOS Postpetition Transfers\n\n# **SCHEDULE 14A**\n\nHimalaya Ltd. Prepetition Transfers\n\n# **SCHEDULE 14B**\n\nHimalaya Ltd. Postpetition Transfers","body_zh":"B1040（FORM 1040）（12/15）\n\n对抗程序封面页\n（背面附说明） 对抗程序编号\n（仅供法院使用）\n\n原告 被告\n律师（律师事务所名称、地址及电话号码） 律师\n（如已知）\n当事人（仅勾选一个方框）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国受托人/破产管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人 当事人（仅勾选一个方框）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国受托人/破产管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人\n诉因\n（请简要陈述诉因，包括所涉及的全部美国法条）\n诉讼性质\n（从主要诉因开始编号为1，第一备选诉因为2，第二备选诉因为3，依此类推，最多勾选五（5）项。）\nFRBP 7001(1) – 请求返还金钱/财产\n□\n11-请求返还金钱/财产 - §542 交付财产\n□\n12-请求返还金钱/财产 - §547 优先受偿\n□\n13-请求返还金钱/财产 - §548 欺诈性转让\n□\n14-请求返还金钱/财产 - 其他\nFRBP 7001(2) – 留置权的有效性、优先权或范围\n□\n21-留置权或其他财产权益的有效性、优先权或范围 FRBP 7001(6) – 债务可免除性（续）\n□\n61-债务可免除性 - §523(a)(5)，家庭扶养\n□\n68-债务可免除性 - §523(a)(6)，故意及恶意损害\n□\n63-债务可免除性 - §523(a)(8)，学生贷款\n□\n64-债务可免除性 - §523(a)(15)，离婚或分居义务\n（家庭扶养义务除外）\n□\n65-债务可免除性 - 其他\nFRBP 7001(3) – 批准出售财产\n□\n31-批准出售破产财团财产及共同所有人财产 - §363(h) FRBP 7001(7) – 禁令救济\n□\n71-禁令救济 – 实施中止\n□\n72-禁令救济 – 其他\nFRBP 7001(4) – 对债务免除提出异议/撤销债务免除\n□\n41-对债务免除提出异议/撤销债务免除 - §727(c),(d),(e) FRBP 7001(8) 请求权或权益劣后\n□\n81-请求权或权益劣后\nFRBP 7001(5) – 撤销确认\n□\n51-撤销确认 FRBP 7001(9) 确认之诉\n□\n91-确认之诉\nFRBP 7001(6) – 债务可免除性\n□\n66-债务可免除性 - §523(a)(1),(14),(14A) 优先税务请求权\n□\n62-债务可免除性 - §523(a)(2)，虚假借口、虚假陈述、\n实际欺诈\n□\n67-债务可免除性 - §523(a)(4)，受托人欺诈、侵占、盗窃\n（续见下一栏） FRBP 7001(10) 对移送诉讼的裁定\n□\n01-对被移送请求权或诉因的裁定\n其他\n□\nSS-SIPA案件 – 15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.\n□\n02-其他（例如，如与破产案件无关本应在州法院提起的其他诉讼）\n□ 如本案涉及州法实体争议，请勾选 □ 如主张本案为依FRCP 23提起的集体诉讼，请勾选\n□ 如起诉状中请求陪审团审判，请勾选 请求金额 \\$\n请求的其他救济\nB1040（FORM 1040）（12/15）\n\n本对抗程序所涉破产案件\n\n债务人姓名 破产案件编号\n案件审理地区 分院办公室 法官姓名\n相关对抗程序（如有）\n原告 被告 对抗\n程序编号\n对抗程序审理地区 分院办公室 法官姓名\n律师（或原告）签名\n日期 律师（或原告）姓名正楷\n说明\n\n提交破产案件将在破产法院管辖下设立“破产财团”，其包括债务人的全部财产，无论该等财产位于何处。由于破产财团范围广泛且法院管辖权十分宽泛，可能会就破产财团的财产或财产权利发生诉讼。也可能发生涉及债务人债务免除的诉讼。如该等诉讼在破产法院提起，则称为对抗程序。\n\n提交对抗程序的一方还必须填写并提交Form 1040，即对抗程序封面页，除非该方通过法院的案件管理/电子案件提交系统（CM/ECF）以电子方式提交对抗程序。（CM/ECF在提交过程中会采集Form 1040中的信息。）完成后，该封面页概述对抗程序的基本信息。法院书记员需要该等信息以处理对抗程序并编制所需的法院活动统计报告。\n\n封面页及其中所载信息并不替代或补充法律、《破产程序规则》或法院地方法规所要求的诉状或其他文书的提交和送达。该封面页大部分内容不言自明，必须由原告律师填写（如原告未由律师代理，则由原告填写）。每份已提交的起诉状均须向书记员另行提交一份封面页。\n\n原告和被告。请准确填写起诉状中所载原告和被告的姓名。\n\n律师。如已知，请填写律师的姓名和地址。\n\n当事人。请在第一栏中为原告、在第二栏中为被告勾选最适当的方框。\n\n请求金额。填写起诉状中请求的美元金额。\n\n签名。该封面页必须由登记在案的律师在表格第二页的方框内签署。如原告由律师事务所代理，该事务所的一名成员必须签署。如原告自行诉讼，即未由律师代理，则必须由原告签署。\n对抗程序封面页\n被告续页\n\n1. Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.（喜马拉雅澳大利亚雅典娜农场公司）\n2. Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd.（喜马拉雅澳大利亚有限公司）\n3. Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC.（喜马拉雅波士顿五月花有限责任公司）\n4. Himalaya New World Inc.（喜马拉雅新世界公司）\n5. Himalaya New York Rock.（喜马拉雅纽约岩石公司）\n6. Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC.（喜马拉雅上海农场有限责任公司）\n7. Himalaya UK Club.（喜马拉雅英国俱乐部）\n8. Himalaya Worldwide LS.（喜马拉雅全球LS）\n9. HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd.（HML温哥华帆船农场有限公司）\n10. Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC.（金门喜马拉雅农场有限责任公司）\n11. MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc.（MOS喜马拉雅基金会公司）\n12. UK Himalaya Ltd.（英国喜马拉雅有限公司）\n美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院\n\nx\n\n关于： ：\n： 第11章\n\nHo Wan Kwok（郭文贵），\n等， ：\n： Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。\n：\n： （联合管理）\n\nLuc A. Despins（卢克·A.·德斯平斯），第11章\n受托人，\n诉\nHimalaya Australia Athena\nFarm Inc.，\n等， x\n\n原告，\n\n： Adv. Proceeding No. [ ]\nFebruary 15, 2024\nx\n被告。\n第11章受托人根据《破产法典》第544、548、549及550条以及《纽约州债务人与债权人法》第273、274及276条，请求撤销并追回欺诈性转让和申请破产后转让及相关救济的起诉状\n\nLuc A. Despins，以其获指定担任郭文贵（“债务人”或“Kwok”）第11章案件（“第11章案件”）第11章受托人（“受托人”）的身份，针对被告Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为Ho Wan Kwok（亦称Guo Wengui、Miles Guo及Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC及Genever Holdings Corporation的邮寄地址为Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，收件人为Luc A. Despins，作为Ho Wan Kwok破产财团受托人（仅用于通知和通信）。\n\n（“Himalaya Athena”）、Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd.（“Himalaya Australia”）、Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC（“Himalaya Boston”）、Himalaya New World Inc.（“Himalaya New World”）、Himalaya New York Rock（“Himalaya NY”）、Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC（“Himalaya Shanghai”）、Himalaya UK Club（“Himalaya UK”）、Himalaya Worldwide LS（“Himalaya WW”）、HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd（“Vancouver”）、Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC（“Golden Gate”）、MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc.（“MOS”）及UK Himalaya Ltd.（“Himalaya Ltd.”）（统称“被告”）提起本对抗程序起诉状（“起诉状”），陈述如下：\n诉讼性质\n\n1. 受托人提起本对抗程序，以撤销并追回：(a) 本第11章案件开始前对债务人财产作出的转让；以及(b) 本第11章案件开始后，对债务人第11章破产财团财产作出的、未经破产法院或《美国法典》第11编（“破产法典”）授权的转让。\n\n2. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司，在申请日（定义见下文）之前，向作为初始受让人的被告转让了如下数额的资金，具体如下所列（并更完整地载于随附并构成本起诉状一部分的附表）：\n\na. 向Himalaya Athena转让\\$105,000.00；\nb. 向Himalaya Australia转让\\$155,000.00；\nc. 向Himalaya Boston转让\\$179,900.00；\nd. 向Himalaya New World转让\\$436,547.11；\ne. 向Himalaya WW转让\\$105,000.00；\nf. 向Vancouver转让\\$205,000.00；\ng. 向Golden Gate转让\\$305,209.27；以及\nh. 向Himalaya Ltd.转让\\$582,400.65。\n\n3. 该等转让属于实际欺诈性转让，因为债务人将其作为其“空壳把戏”的一部分予以实施，并且作出该等转让的意图是阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人的债权人。或者，该等转让属于推定欺诈性转让，因为作出该等转让时债务人已无清偿能力，且债务人未因此获得合理等值的对价。\n\n4. 在申请日后，债务人通过其另我空壳公司，向作为初始受让人的被告转让资金如下：\n\na. 向Himalaya Athena转让\\$105,000.00；\nb. 向Himalaya New World转让\\$350,000.00；\nc. 向Himalaya NY转让\\$270,000.00；\nd. 向Himalaya Shanghai转让\\$156,000.00；\ne. 向Himalaya UK转让\\$300,000.00；\nf. 向Himalaya WW转让\\$105,000.00；\ng. 向Vancouver转让\\$50,000.00；\nh. 向Golden Gate转让\\$530,000.00；\ni. 向MOS转让\\$694,228.13；以及\nj. 向Himalaya Ltd.转让\\$160,000.00。\n\n5. 因为该等破产财团财产的申请破产后转让未经法院或《破产法典》授权，故该等转让可根据《破产法典》第549和550条予以撤销及追回。\n管辖权和审判地\n\n6. 本院根据28 U.S.C. § 1334(b)对本对抗程序具有事项管辖权。\n\n7. 本对抗程序已根据28 U.S.C. § 157(a)移交本院审理。\n\n8. 本案所请求救济的法定依据包括《破产法典》第544、548、549及550条，以及《纽约州债务人与债权人法》第273、274及276条2，或任何其他适用的州法对应规定。\n当事人\n\n9. 受托人系第11章案件的第11章受托人，依据破产法院于July 8, 2022作出的命令[Case No. 22-50073（“主案”）Docket No. 523]任命。\n\n10. Himalaya Athena是一家澳大利亚公司，地址为48 Piccadilly Cres. Keysborough, VIC 3173 Australia。\n\n11. Himalaya Australia是一家澳大利亚有限公司，地址为Unit 5, 27-29 Illawarra Street, Allawah, NSW 2218 Australia。\n\n2 下文中，对《纽约州债务人与债权人法》的所有法条引用均称为“N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law”。《纽约州统一可撤销交易法》（“NYUVT”）取代《纽约州统一欺诈性转让法》（“NYUFC”），并于April 4, 2020生效，适用于在April 4, 2020当日或之后作出的转让或承担的义务。对于April 4, 2020之前的转让，受托人在本诉讼中根据NYUFC及N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、273a、275、276及278条寻求救济。\n\n12. Himalaya Boston是一家佛罗里达州有限责任公司，地址为3513 NE 171 Street, North Miami Beach, Florida 33160。\n\n13. Himalaya New World是一家弗吉尼亚州股份公司，地址为12587 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 135, Fairfax, Virgina 22033。\n\n14. Himalaya NY是一家纽约州股份公司，地址为301 West 110 Street, Apt. 8E, New York, New York 10025。\n\n15. Himalaya Shanghai（喜马拉雅上海）是一家特拉华州有限责任公司，地址位于 12 Lara Lane, Wilmington, Delaware 19808。\n\n16. Himalaya UK（喜马拉雅英国）是一家私人有限公司，地址位于 120 Baker Street, 3rd Floor, London W1U 6TU, United Kingdom。\n\n17. Himalaya WW（喜马拉雅全球）是一家西班牙有限责任公司，地址位于 Av De San Pablo 28, Nave 28, Coslada, Madrid, Spain。\n\n18. Vancouver（温哥华）是一家不列颠哥伦比亚省公司，地址位于 201-13065 84th Avenue, Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1B3, Canada。\n\n19. Golden Gate（金门）是一家加利福尼亚州有限责任公司，地址位于 8371 Central Avenue, Suite B, Newark, California 94560。\n\n20. MOS 是一家纽约州非营利公司。\n\n21. Himalaya Ltd.（喜马拉雅有限公司）是一家英国私人有限公司，地址位于 Spaces – The Charter Building, Charter Place, Uxbridge UB81JG, United Kingdom。\n\n事实\n\nA. Chapter 11 案件\n\n22. 债务人于 February 15, 2022（“申请日”）向 United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut（康涅狄格联邦地区破产法院）（“破产法院”）提交了依据《破产法》第 11 章请求救济的自愿申请，从而启动本 Chapter 11 案件。\n\n23. 于 March 21, 2022，Office of the United States Trustee（美国受托人办公室）在本 Chapter 11 案件中任命了无担保债权人正式委员会。尚未任命审查员。\n\n24. 债务人于 March 2022 向破产法院提交的破产清单称，其拥有 \\$3,850 的资产，并产生了数亿美元的负债。3 尽管债务人确实负债累累，但其清单未披露债务人通过其众多作为其另一自我的空壳公司持有和／或转移的财产。\n\n25. 于 June 15, 2022，破产法院作出决定备忘录及命令 [Main Case Docket No. 465]，指示美国受托人在本 Chapter 11 案件中任命一名第 11 章受托人。根据该命令，美国受托人选定 Luc A. Despins（吕克·A·德斯平斯）为受托人。于 July 8, 2022，破产法院作出命令，批准任命 Luc A. Despins 为本 Chapter 11 案件的受托人 [Main Case Docket No. 523]。\n\nB. 债务人对空壳公司的使用及受托人的对抗程序\n\n26. 债务人使用众多作为其另一自我的空壳公司，以阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人。4 多年来，债务人精心策划了一场“空壳游戏”，利用一个复杂的空壳公司网络；这些公司名义上由家庭成员、亲信和／或下属持有，但实际上由债务人控制。这场空壳游戏使债务人能够使用、支出和／或转移数百万美元现金及其他资产，同时向债权人隐匿其财产。\n\n法院已作出判决，认定 Golden Spring (New York) Ltd（“Golden Spring”）（纽约金泉有限公司）是债务人的另一自我。见 Despins v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018（“Golden\n\n3 资产和负债清单，第 1 页 [Main Case Docket No. 78]。\n\n4 在对抗程序 Despins v. Greenwich Land, LLC（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5005（“Greenwich Land A.P.”），Docket No. 78）中，现有一项待决的简易判决动议，以确定 Greenwich Land LLC（“Greenwich Land”）（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）是债务人的另一自我。受托人通过援引纳入本文件其在 Greenwich Land A.P. 中提交的起诉书（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5005, Docket No. 1）。\n\n27. 自受任以来，受托人在本 Chapter 11 案件中提起了多项对抗程序，以便除其他事项外，确立债务人的空壳公司是其另一自我，和／或该等公司及其资产在衡平法上归债务人所有；在若干此类对抗程序中，破产法院已准予该等救济。5\n\n受托人已对 Lamp Capital LLC（“Lamp Capital”）（兰普资本有限责任公司）、Hudson Diamond NY LLC（“Hudson Diamond”）（哈德逊钻石纽约有限责任公司）、Leading Shine NY Ltd（“Leading Shine”）（领耀纽约有限公司）提起对抗程序；该对抗程序除其他事项外，请求作出确认判决，认定 Hudson Diamond 和 Leading Shine 是债务人的另一自我。见 Despins v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023（“Lamp Capital A.P.”））。法院已作出判决，认定 Lamp Capital 是债务人的另一自我 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 66]，且已对 Leading Shine 作出缺席裁定 [Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 13]。受托人通过援引纳入本文件其在 Lamp Capital A.P. 中提交的起诉书（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 1）。\n\n受托人已提起或即将对 G Club International Limited（G俱乐部国际有限公司）、G Club Operations LLC（G俱乐部运营有限责任公司）、G Fashion（G时尚）、G Fashion International Limited（G时尚国际有限公司）、G Fashion Media Group Inc（G时尚传媒集团公司）、Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.（法治基金会 III 公司）、Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会 IV 公司）、GFNY Inc.、以及 Anton Development Limited（安东开发有限公司）提起对抗程序；该对抗程序除其他事项外，请求作出确认判决，认定这些实体是债务人的另一自我，和／或其及其名义持有的任何财产在衡平法上归债务人所有。受托人通过援引纳入本文件其在该对抗程序中提交的起诉书。\n\n5 其中包括以下对抗程序：(i) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]；(ii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Greenwich Land LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05005]；(iii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Mei Guo [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05008]；(iv) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05013]；(v) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Taurus Fund LLC, et al., Adv. Proc.\n\nSpring A.P.”），Docket No. 35）。受托人通过援引纳入本文件其在 Golden Spring A.P. 中提交的起诉书（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018, Docket No. 1）。\n\n在对抗程序 Despins v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et. al.（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013（“HCHK Entities A.P.”），Docket No. 139）中，已对 HCHK Property Management Inc（“HCHK Property”）（HCHK 物业管理公司）、HCHK Technologies Inc（“HCHK Technologies”）（HCHK 技术公司）以及 Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.（“Lexington”）（列克星敦物业及人力公司）作出缺席裁定；该对抗程序除其他事项外，请求作出确认判决，认定 HCHK Technologies、HCHK Property 和 Lexington 是债务人的另一自我。受托人通过援引纳入本文件其在 HCHK Entities A.P. 中提交的起诉书（Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013, Docket No. 1）。\n\n28. 这些诉讼中的事实模式一贯包括：(i) 由近亲家庭成员和／或下属持有的、受债务人控制的空壳公司；(ii) 以来自其他受债务人控制实体的现金购得和／或无对价转移给空壳实体及在空壳实体之间转移的资产；以及 (iii) 债务人从该等资产中获益，并对其拥有控制权和支配权。\n\nC. 债务人为阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈债权人所实施的行为\n\n29. 除受托人对抗程序中所处理的事项外，破产法院还认定，债务人是 Ace Decade Limited（艾斯十年有限公司）（并通过该公司为 Dawn State Limited（黎明州有限公司））的实益所有人，且债务人控制并使用了 Ace Decade Limited 的名义股东 Yvette Wang（王伊维特）。6\n\n30. 破产法院还认定，“G Entities”（Gettr、G Fashion、G Music、GClubs、GNews 和 GEdu）、New Federal State of China（中国新联邦国）和 Rule of Law Foundation（法治基金会），以及其他声称独立的实体和组织，均由债务人控制7、由债务人领导8，和／或服务于债务人的“目的……并作为债务人的商业载体”。9\n\n31. 在申请日之前，United States District Court for the Southern District of New York（纽约南区联邦地区法院）的 Liman 法官认定，Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方盈利有限公司）——一家最初由债务人的一名厨师拥有、后转让给债务人女儿的实体——“实质上是”债务人的一家“空壳公司”。10\n\nNo. 23-05017]；(vi) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited [Adv. Proc. 23-05018]；以及 (vii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. 23-05023]。\n\n6 准许关于认定债务人藐视公司治理命令的动议的命令，第 ¶¶ 1, 4 段（Jan. 24, 2023, Docket No. 1372（“Corp. Governance Contempt Order”）。\n\n7 部分准许初步禁令动议的经更正决定备忘录，第 ¶ 3 段（Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032, January 13, 2023（“债务人还控制 Saraca Media Group（萨拉卡传媒集团）及一个相关实体‘GTV’。”）。\n\n8 同上，第 ¶ 7 段（“债务人是 The Whistleblower Movement（爆料革命）、NFSC、ROLF 和 Himalaya 的领导人。”）。\n\n9 同上（“The Whistleblower Movement、NFSC、ROLF、GSeries 和 Himalaya 服务于债务人的目的，作为债务人的商业载体，其成员对债务人个人忠诚。”）。\n\n32. 债务人不遗余力地阻碍和拖延其最大债权人之一，即 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P.（“PAX”）（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）的追偿努力。于 2017，PAX 在 Supreme Court of the State of New York（纽约州最高法院）（“纽约法院”）对债务人提起诉讼，Index No. 652077/2017（“PAX 案件”），请求就所欠款项作出判决。于 February 3, 2021，PAX 从纽约法院取得针对债务人的 \\$116,402,019.57 判决（“PAX 判决”）。PAX 试图通过扣押债务人的资产来执行 PAX 判决——包括 Lady May（梅夫人号），债务人谎称该游艇由其女儿所有；以及债务人在曼哈顿的豪华公寓，债务人谎称该公寓为债务人之子而以信托方式持有。债务人在判决后程序中藐视纽约法院命令，最终导致债务人被处以 \\$134 million 的藐视法庭罚款。\n\n33. 债务人还将其另一自我作为个人钱袋，在向债权人隐匿这些另一自我中的资产，并阻碍和拖延债权人就其债权获得追偿的同时，为其本人及其家人已经习惯的奢侈生活方式提供资金。债务人通过这些另一自我实施的转让延续了债务人的欺诈计划。\n\n10 Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC, No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL) 2021 WL 2554631, at \\*1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021)。\n\n34. 债务人已在破产法院作证称，其资产不足以偿还其负债，且其奢侈生活方式由其家人通过名义上由家庭成员持有的企业提供资金。11 债务人仅列报 \\$3,850 的资产。12\n\n35. 于 March 2023，债务人被捕，并仍被羁押，等待就包括电信欺诈、证券欺诈和洗钱在内的联邦刑事指控受审。\n\n36. 美国政府在针对债务人的刑事起诉书中主张，债务人及其共同被告“利用以至少 80 个不同实体或个人名义持有的超过约 500 个账户，对超过 \\$1 billion 的欺诈所得进行洗钱。”13\n\n37. 债务人作为其另一自我的实体的财产，在申请日之前的任何时候均为债务人的财产。\n\n38. 在与本案有关的所有时期，债务人在 New York, New York 开展业务，包括指挥本起诉书所涉的申请前转让。\n\nD. 债务人的空壳游戏及欺诈在申请后仍在持续\n\n39. 截至申请日，债务人通过其另一自我持有的所有财产均成为第 11 章破产财产。见 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1)。\n\n11 关于债务人请求作出临时及最终 DIP 命令的听证会：(I) 授权债务人取得无担保、次级的申请后融资；及 (II) 安排临时及最终听证会；以及 (III) 准予相关救济（Main Case, April 27, 2022）。\n\n12 见注释3\n\n13 参见美利坚合众国（United States of America）就被告王燕平（Yanping Wang）的审前释放动议所提交的反对法律备忘录，第29页，该备忘录作为第11章受托人（Chapter 11 Trustee）就G Club Operations LLC（G Club Operations LLC）对受托人强制履行动议及相关救济请求的补充异议所作答复的附件B附具（June 23, 2023, Main Case Docket No. 1934）。\n\n40. 在破产申请日（Petition Date）之后，债务人公然漠视破产法院（Bankruptcy Court）及其根据《破产法典》（Bankruptcy Code）承担的义务，继续通过众多另一自我空壳公司实施转让。\n\n41. 这些申请后转让均未经破产法院授权，亦未根据《破产法典》获得授权。\n\nE. 为阻碍、拖延或欺诈债权人而作出的转让\n\n42. 本起诉状中所涉的转让（定义见本文）均系通过作为债务人空壳游戏一部分而运营的债务人另一自我空壳公司作出，因而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图。\n\n43. 债务人故意以此种方式安排其财务事务，以便隐匿和耗散数百万美元资产，同时向其众多债权人虚假地声称贫困。债务人声称自己一贫如洗，却同时为其本人、其家庭成员及亲密关联人维持亿万富翁生活方式而大肆花费。\n\n44. 债务人所隐匿和耗散的资产包括其从加密货币、证券及其他欺诈计划的受害人处取得的资金。由于该等行为，债务人在纽约南区美国联邦地区法院（U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York）审理的一宗刑事案件中面临多项重罪欺诈、洗钱及敲诈勒索指控。参见 United States v. Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）, case no. 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.)。\n\n45. 债务人明知并意图通过以此种方式隐匿和耗散其资产，将不会留有足够资产偿还其债权人——包括其诸多欺诈行为的受害人。因此，这些转让必然系出于阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图而作出。\n\nF. 向被告作出的转让\n\n46. 在破产申请日之前，债务人使用其另一自我空壳公司，见上文脚注4及所附附表，或以其他方式，向被告转让债务人的财产（统称“申请前转让”），具体如下：\n\na. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表1A所列申请前转让（“Himalaya Athena（喜马拉雅雅典娜）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya Athena作出。\n\nb. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表2所列申请前转让（“Himalaya Australia（喜马拉雅澳大利亚）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya Australia作出。\n\nc. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表3所列申请前转让（“Himalaya Boston（喜马拉雅波士顿）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya Boston作出。\n\nd. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表5A所列申请前转让（“Himalaya New World（喜马拉雅新世界）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya New World作出。\n\ne. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表10A所列申请前转让（“Himalaya WW（喜马拉雅WW）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya WW作出。\n\nf. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表11A所列申请前转让（“Vancouver（温哥华）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Vancouver作出。\n\ng. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表12A所列申请前转让（“Golden Gate（金门）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Golden Gate作出。\n\nh. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表14A所列申请前转让（“Himalaya Ltd.（喜马拉雅有限公司）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya Ltd.作出。\n\n47. 在破产申请日之后，债务人通过其另一自我空壳公司，见上文脚注4及所附附表，或以其他方式，向被告转让破产财产（统称“申请后转让”），具体如下：\n\na. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表1B所列申请后转让（“Himalaya Athena申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya Athena作出。\n\nb. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表5B所列申请后转让（“Himalaya New World申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya New World作出。\n\nc. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表6所列申请后转让（“Himalaya NY（喜马拉雅纽约）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya NY作出。\n\nd. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表7所列申请后转让（“Himalaya Shanghai（喜马拉雅上海）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya Shanghai作出。\n\ne. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表8所列申请后转让（“Himalaya UK（喜马拉雅英国）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya UK作出。\n\nf. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表10B所列申请后转让（“Himalaya WW申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya WW作出。\n\ng. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表11B所列申请后转让（“Vancouver申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Vancouver作出。\n\nh. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表12B所列申请后转让（“Golden Gate申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Golden Gate作出。\n\ni. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表13所列申请后转让（“MOS（MOS）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向MOS作出。\n\nj. 本文所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表14B所列申请后转让（“Himalaya Ltd.申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另一自我向Himalaya Ltd.作出。\n\n48. 在作出申请前转让和申请后转让（统称“转让”）时，债务人对债务人破产财产的债权人负有未清偿义务。\n\n49. 被告系其所收受转让的初始受让人（如本文所述）。\n\n第一项请求\n\n（针对Himalaya Athena）\n\n（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n50. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n51. Himalaya Athena申请前转让系债务人通过其另一自我作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n52. 债务人在实施Himalaya Athena申请前转让时具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，具体表现包括：\n\na. Himalaya Athena申请前转让系使用另一自我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya Athena申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya Athena申请前转让系债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya Athena申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈中获益，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya Athena申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈中获利，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya Athena申请前转让时，债务人正面临诉讼，包括PAX（PAX）在PAX案件（PAX Case）中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Himalaya Athena申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n53. Himalaya Athena申请前转让可由受托人根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条撤销，并可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条追回。\n\n第二项请求\n\n（针对Himalaya Athena）\n\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、274和276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n54. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n55. Himalaya Athena申请前转让系债务人通过其另一自我作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n56. 债务人在实施Himalaya Athena申请前转让时具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，具体表现包括：\n\na. Himalaya Athena申请前转让系使用另一自我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya Athena申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya Athena申请前转让系债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya Athena申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈中获益，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya Athena申请前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈中获利，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya Athena申请前转让时，债务人正面临诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Himalaya Athena申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n57. Himalaya Athena申请前转让可由受托人根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(1)、274和276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条撤销，并可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条追回。\n\n第三项请求\n\n（针对Himalaya Athena）\n\n（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n58. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n59. 债务人就Himalaya Athena申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n60. 在Himalaya Athena申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或因Himalaya Athena申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n61. 在Himalaya Athena申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产均构成数额不合理偏低的资本。\n\n62. 在Himalaya Athena申请前转让时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n63. Himalaya Athena（喜马拉雅雅典娜）申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第四项请求权\n（关于Himalaya Athena）\n\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n64. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n65. 债务人未就Himalaya Athena申请破产前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n66. 在Himalaya Athena申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或者债务人因Himalaya Athena申请破产前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n67. 在Himalaya Athena申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所剩任何财产对于该业务或交易而言均构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n68. 在Himalaya Athena申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n69. 受托人可根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)撤销Himalaya Athena申请破产前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第五项请求权\n（关于Himalaya Athena）\n\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a)撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让的请求权）\n\n70. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n71. Himalaya Athena申请破产后转让由债务人通过其替身空壳公司向Himalaya Athena作出。\n\n72. Himalaya Athena申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n73. Himalaya Athena申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n74. Himalaya Athena申请破产后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产未经授权的转让。\n\n75. Himalaya Athena申请破产后转让可根据《破产法》第549(a)条予以撤销。\n\n76. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya Athena追回Himalaya Athena申请破产后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款日的利息及本案诉讼费用。\n\n第六项请求权\n（关于Himalaya Australia（喜马拉雅澳大利亚））\n\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n77. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n78. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让由债务人通过其替身作出，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n79. 债务人在实施Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，在其控制的债务人家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让通过使债务人从其欺诈行为中获益、而不使其财产受到其债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让通过使债务人从其欺诈行为中获利、而不使其财产受到其债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX（PAX）在PAX Case（PAX案）中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n80. 受托人可根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条撤销Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第七项请求权\n（关于Himalaya Australia）\n\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276及Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n81. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n82. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让由债务人通过其替身作出，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n83. 债务人在实施Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，在其控制的债务人家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让通过使债务人从其欺诈行为中获益、而不使其财产受到其债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让通过使债务人从其欺诈行为中获利、而不使其财产受到其债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n84. 受托人可根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276及Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)撤销Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第八项请求权\n（关于Himalaya Australia）\n\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n85. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n86. 债务人就Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n87. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或者债务人因Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n88. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所剩任何财产对于该业务或交易而言均构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n89. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n90. Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第九项请求权\n（关于Himalaya Australia）\n\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n91. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n92. 债务人未就Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n93. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或者债务人因Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n94. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所剩任何财产对于该业务或交易而言均构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n95. 在Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n96. 受托人可根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)撤销Himalaya Australia申请破产前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十项救济请求\n（关于Himalaya Boston（喜马拉雅波士顿））\n\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n97. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n98. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让由债务人通过其替身作出，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n99. 债务人在实施Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，在其控制的债务人家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让通过使债务人从其欺诈行为中获益、而不使其财产受到其债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让通过使债务人从其欺诈行为中获利、而不使其财产受到其债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n100. 受托人可根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条撤销Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第十一项请求权\n（关于Himalaya Boston）\n\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276及Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n101. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n102. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让由债务人通过其替身作出，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n103. 债务人在实施Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya Boston申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 喜马拉雅波士顿（Himalaya Boston）申请前转让系债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属协助下，作为其“空壳游戏”的一部分实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括由PAX（PAX）在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人无偿债能力或资本不足。\n\n104. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276、Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让；并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十二项请求\n（关于喜马拉雅波士顿）\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n105. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n106. 债务人就喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n107. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人已无偿债能力，或因喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让而变得无偿债能力。\n\n108. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n109. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n110. 喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十三项请求\n（关于喜马拉雅波士顿）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n111. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n112. 债务人未就喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n113. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人已无偿债能力，或债务人因喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让而变得无偿债能力。\n\n114. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n115. 在喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n116. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276、Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销喜马拉雅波士顿申请前转让；并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十四项请求\n（关于喜马拉雅新世界（Himalaya New World））\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回具有实际欺诈意图的转让）\n\n117. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n118. 债务人通过其自我替身，以实际阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，实施了喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让。\n\n119. 债务人在实施喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的事实，除其他外，体现在：\n\na. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让系利用一家自我替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让系债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属协助下，作为其“空壳游戏”的一部分实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括由PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人无偿债能力或资本不足。\n\n120. 根据Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，受托人可以撤销喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十五项请求\n（关于喜马拉雅新世界）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回具有实际欺诈意图的转让）\n\n121. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n122. 债务人通过其自我替身，以实际阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，实施了喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让。\n\n123. 债务人在实施喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的事实，除其他外，体现在：\n\na. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让系利用一家自我替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让系债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属协助下，作为其“空壳游戏”的一部分实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括由PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人无偿债能力或资本不足。\n\n124. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276、Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让；并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十六项请求\n（关于喜马拉雅新世界）\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n125. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n126. 债务人就喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n127. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人已无偿债能力，或因财产申请前转让而变得无偿债能力。\n\n128. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n129. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n130. 喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十七项请求\n（关于喜马拉雅新世界）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n131. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n132. 债务人未就喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n133. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人已无偿债能力，或债务人因喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让而变得无偿债能力。\n\n134. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n135. 在喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时其无力偿付的债务。\n\n136. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276、Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销喜马拉雅新世界申请前转让；并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第十八项请求\n\n（关于喜马拉雅新世界）\n\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a)请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让）\n\n137. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n138. 债务人通过其自我替身空壳公司向喜马拉雅新世界作出了喜马拉雅新世界申请后转让。\n\n139. 喜马拉雅新世界申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n140. 喜马拉雅新世界申请后转让未经破产法院或Bankruptcy Code授权。\n\n141. 喜马拉雅新世界申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产未经授权的转让。\n\n142. 根据Bankruptcy Code section 549(a)，喜马拉雅新世界申请后转让可以撤销。\n\n143. 根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向喜马拉雅新世界追回喜马拉雅新世界申请后转让，或其价值，加计至付款日的利息以及本案费用。\n\n第十九项请求\n（关于喜马拉雅纽约（Himalaya NY））\n（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a)请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让）\n\n144. 受托人重申并再次主张第1-49段所载指控，如同在本文中完整载明。\n\n145. 债务人通过其自我替身空壳公司向莱克星顿（Lexington）作出了喜马拉雅纽约申请后转让。\n\n146. 喜马拉雅纽约申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n147. Himalaya NY（喜马拉雅纽约）申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n148. Himalaya NY申请破产后转让构成未经授权转让债务人第11章破产财产。\n\n149. 根据《破产法典》第549(a)条，Himalaya NY申请破产后转让可予撤销。\n\n150. 根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya NY追回Himalaya NY申请破产后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第二十项请求\n（针对Himalaya Shanghai（喜马拉雅上海））\n（根据《破产法典》第549条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让）\n\n151. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n152. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向Himalaya Shanghai作出了Himalaya Shanghai申请破产后转让。\n\n153. Himalaya Shanghai申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n154. Himalaya Shanghai申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n155. Himalaya Shanghai申请破产后转让构成未经授权转让债务人第11章破产财产。\n\n156. 根据《破产法典》第549(a)条，Himalaya Shanghai转让可予撤销。\n\n157. 根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya Shanghai追回Himalaya Shanghai申请破产后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第二十一项请求\n（针对Himalaya UK（喜马拉雅英国））\n（根据《破产法典》第549条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让）\n\n158. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n159. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向Himalaya UK作出了Himalaya UK申请破产后转让。\n\n160. Himalaya UK申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n161. Himalaya UK申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n162. Himalaya UK申请破产后转让构成未经授权转让债务人第11章破产财产。\n\n163. 根据《破产法典》第549(a)条，Himalaya UK申请破产后转让可予撤销。\n\n164. 根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya UK追回Himalaya UK申请破产后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第二十二项请求\n（针对Himalaya WW（喜马拉雅WW））\n（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n165. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n166. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了Himalaya WW申请破产前转让。\n\n167. 债务人在实施Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，显示如下：\n\na. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让系使用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受制于债权人的追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受制于债权人的追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案中对其提起的诉讼；及\n\ng. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n168. 根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条，受托人可撤销Himalaya WW申请破产前转让；并可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第二十三项请求\n（针对Himalaya WW）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、274及276条，以及《破产法典》第544(b)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n169. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n170. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了Himalaya WW申请破产前转让。\n\n171. 债务人在实施Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，显示如下：\n\na. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让系使用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受制于债权人的追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受制于债权人的追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案中对其提起的诉讼；及\n\ng. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n172. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(1)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条，受托人可撤销Himalaya WW申请破产前转让；并可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第二十四项请求\n（针对Himalaya WW）\n（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n173. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n174. 债务人就Himalaya WW申请破产前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n175. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人资不抵债，或因Himalaya WW申请破产前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n176. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产对于该业务或交易而言均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n177. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n178. Himalaya WW申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，并可由受托人根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条撤销，且可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条追回。\n\n第二十五项请求\n（针对Himalaya WW）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(2)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n179. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n180. 债务人就Himalaya WW申请破产前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n181. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人资不抵债，或债务人因Himalaya WW申请破产前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n182. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产对于该业务或交易而言均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n183. 在Himalaya WW申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n184. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(2)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条，受托人可撤销Himalaya WW申请破产前转让；并可根据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第二十六项请求\n（针对Himalaya WW）\n（根据《破产法典》第549条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让）\n\n185. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n186. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向Himalaya WW作出了Himalaya WW申请破产后转让。\n\n187. Himalaya WW转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n188. Himalaya WW申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n189. Himalaya WW申请破产后转让构成未经授权转让债务人第11章破产财产。\n\n190. 根据《破产法典》第549(a)条，Himalaya WW申请破产后转让可予撤销。\n\n191. 根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya WW追回Himalaya WW申请破产后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第二十七项请求\n（针对Vancouver（温哥华））\n（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n192. 受托人重述并再次主张第1-49段所载指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n193. 债务人在实施Vancouver申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，显示如下：\n\na. Vancouver申请破产前转让系使用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Vancouver申请破产前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Vancouver申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Vancouver申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受制于债权人的追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Vancouver申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受制于债权人的追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Vancouver申请破产前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括PAX在PAX案中对其提起的诉讼；及\n\ng. 在Vancouver申请破产前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n温哥华（Vancouver）破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A) 撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回。\n\n第二十八项请求\n（关于 Vancouver（温哥华））\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n1. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n2. 温哥华破产申请前转让由债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n3. 温哥华破产申请前转让由债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n4. 债务人在实施温哥华破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实表明：\n\na. 温哥华破产申请前转让系通过一家替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 温哥华破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 温哥华破产申请前转让系债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人为隐瞒和保护资产而控制的其家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施；\n\nd. 温哥华破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 温哥华破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n温哥华破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回。\n\n第二十九项请求\n（关于 Vancouver）\n（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n5. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n6. 债务人就温哥华破产申请前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n7. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因温哥华破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n8. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n9. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n10. 温哥华破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人依据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回。\n\n第三十项请求\n（关于 Vancouver）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n11. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n12. 债务人就温哥华破产申请前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n13. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因温哥华破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n14. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n15. 在温哥华破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n16. 温哥华破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 以及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回。\n\n第三十一项请求\n（关于 Vancouver）\n（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让）\n\n17. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n18. 温哥华破产申请后转让由债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Vancouver 作出。\n\n19. 温哥华破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n20. 温哥华破产申请后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n21. 温哥华破产申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产未经授权的转让。\n\n22. 温哥华破产申请后转让可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a) 撤销。\n\n23. 依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向 Vancouver 追回温哥华破产申请后转让，或其价值，另加截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第三十二项请求\n\n（关于 Golden Gate（金门））\n（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a) (1)(A) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n24. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n25. 债务人在实施金门破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实表明：\n\na. 金门破产申请前转让系通过一家替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 金门破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 金门破产申请前转让系债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人为隐瞒和保护资产而控制的债务人家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施；\n\nd. 金门破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 金门破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n26. 金门破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a) (1)(A) 撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550 (a) 追回。\n\n第三十三项请求\n（关于 Golden Gate）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n27. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n28. 金门破产申请前转让由债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n29. 债务人在实施 G Club Operations（G Club 业务）破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实表明：\n\na. 金门破产申请前转让系通过一家替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 金门破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 金门破产申请前转让系债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，并在债务人为隐瞒和保护资产而控制的其家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施；\n\nd. 金门破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 金门破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n30. 金门破产申请前转让可由受托人依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回。\n\n第三十四项请求\n（关于 Golden Gate）\n（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n31. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n32. 债务人就金门破产申请前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n33. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因金门破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n34. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n35. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n36. 金门破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人依据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回。\n\n第三十五项请求\n（关于 Golden Gate）\n（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n37. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至49段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n38. 债务人就金门破产申请前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n39. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因金门破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n40. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n41. 在金门破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n42. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可撤销 Golden Gate（金门）申请日前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第三十六项诉请\n（关于 Golden Gate）\n（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回未经授权的申请日后转让）\n\n43. 受托人重述并再次主张第 1 至 49 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明一般。\n\n44. 债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司，向 Golden Gate 作出了 Golden Gate 申请日后转让。\n\n45. Golden Gate 申请日后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n46. Golden Gate 申请日后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n47. Golden Gate 申请日后转让构成对债务人 chapter 11 财产的不经授权转让。\n\n48. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a)，Golden Gate 申请日后转让可予撤销。\n\n49. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向 Golden Gate 追回 Golden Gate 申请日后转让或其价值，以及截至付款日的利息和本案诉讼费用。\n\n第三十七项诉请\n（关于 MOS（MOS））\n（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回未经授权的申请日后转让）\n\n50. 受托人重述并再次主张第 1 至 49 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明一般。\n\n51. 债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司，向 MOS 作出了 MOS 申请日后转让。\n\n52. MOS 申请日后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n53. MOS 申请日后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n54. MOS 申请日后转让构成对债务人 chapter 11 财产的不经授权转让。\n\n55. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a)，MOS 申请日后转让可予撤销。\n\n56. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向 MOS 追回 MOS 申请日后转让或其价值，以及截至付款日的利息和本案诉讼费用。\n\n第三十八项诉请\n（关于 Himalaya Ltd.（喜马拉雅有限公司））\n（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n57. 受托人重述并再次主张第 1 至 49 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明一般。\n\n58. 债务人通过其另我作出喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让，实际意图阻碍、延误和/或欺诈其债权人。\n\n59. 债务人在实施喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让时，具有阻碍、延误和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让系利用作为另我的空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让作为债务人的“空壳公司把戏”的一部分实施，债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下，试图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX Case（PAX 案）中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n60. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，受托人可撤销喜马拉雅有限公司转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第三十九项诉请\n（关于喜马拉雅有限公司）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n61. 受托人重述并再次主张第 1 至 49 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明一般。\n\n62. 债务人通过其另我作出喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让，实际意图阻碍、延误和/或欺诈其债权人。\n\n63. 债务人在实施喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让时，具有阻碍、延误和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让系利用作为另我的空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让作为债务人的“空壳公司把戏”的一部分实施，债务人在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下，试图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括 PAX 在 PAX 案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n64. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可撤销喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第四十项诉请\n（关于喜马拉雅有限公司）\n（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n65. 受托人重述并再次主张第 1 至 49 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明一般。\n\n66. 债务人就喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n67. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让而陷入资不抵债。\n\n68. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产均构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n69. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n70. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让构成欺诈性转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，受托人可予撤销，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第四十一项诉请\n（关于喜马拉雅有限公司）\n\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n71. 受托人重述并再次主张第 1 至 49 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明一般。\n\n72. 债务人就喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让未获得合理等值。\n\n73. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让而陷入资不抵债。\n\n74. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产均构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n75. 在喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n76. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可撤销喜马拉雅有限公司申请日前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 追回该等转让。\n\n第四十二项诉请\n（关于喜马拉雅有限公司）\n（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销及追回未经授权的申请日后转让）\n\n77. 受托人重述并再次主张第 1 至 49 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明一般。\n\n78. 债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司，向喜马拉雅有限公司作出了喜马拉雅有限公司申请日后转让。\n\n79. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n80. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n81. 喜马拉雅有限公司申请日后转让构成对债务人 chapter 11 财产的不经授权转让。\n\n82. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a)，喜马拉雅有限公司申请日后转让可予撤销。\n\n83. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向喜马拉雅有限公司追回喜马拉雅有限公司申请日后转让或其价值，以及截至付款日的利息和本案诉讼费用。\n\n【本页其余部分特意留白。】\n\n救济请求\n\n因此，基于前述理由，受托人谨请求作出如下判决：\n\n1. 就第一项诉请而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $105,000.00 的 Himalaya Athena（喜马拉雅雅典娜）申请日前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A) 已被撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示将喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让撤销；及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，向喜马拉雅雅典娜追回喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n2. 就第二项诉请而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $105,000.00 的喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，已被撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示将喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让撤销；及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，向喜马拉雅雅典娜追回喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n3. 就第三项诉请而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $105,000.00 的喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 已被撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示将喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让撤销；及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，向喜马拉雅雅典娜追回喜马拉雅雅典娜申请日前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n4. 就第四项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$105,000.00 的 Himalaya Athena（喜马拉雅雅典娜）破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Athena 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code（破产法典）section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Athena 追回 Himalaya Athena 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n5. 就第五项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$105,000.00 的 Himalaya Athena（喜马拉雅雅典娜）破产申请后转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549，应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Athena 破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Athena 追回 Himalaya Athena 破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n6. 就第六项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$155,000.00 的 Himalaya Australia（喜马拉雅澳大利亚）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Australia 追回 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n7. 就第七项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$155,000.00 的 Himalaya Australia（喜马拉雅澳大利亚）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Australia 追回 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n8. 就第八项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$155,000.00 的 Himalaya Australia（喜马拉雅澳大利亚）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Australia 追回 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n9. 就第九项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$155,000.00 的 Himalaya Australia（喜马拉雅澳大利亚）破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Australia 追回 Himalaya Australia 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n10. 就第十项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$179,900.00 的 Himalaya Boston（喜马拉雅波士顿）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Boston 追回 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n11. 就第十一项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$179,900.00 的 Himalaya Boston（喜马拉雅波士顿）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Boston 追回 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n12. 就第十二项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$179,900.00 的 Himalaya Boston（喜马拉雅波士顿）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Boston 追回 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n13. 就第十三项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$179,900.00 的 Himalaya Boston（喜马拉雅波士顿）破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Boston 追回 Himalaya Boston 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n14. 就第十四项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$436,547.11 的 Himalaya New World（喜马拉雅新世界）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya New World 追回 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n15. 就第十五项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$436,547.11 的 Himalaya New World（喜马拉雅新世界）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya New World 追回 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n16. 就第十六项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$436,547.11 的 Himalaya New World（喜马拉雅新世界）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya New World 追回 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n17. 就第十七项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$436,547.11 的 Himalaya New World（喜马拉雅新世界）破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya New World 追回 Himalaya New World 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n18. 就第十八项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$350,000.00 的 Himalaya New World（喜马拉雅新世界）破产申请后转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549，应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya New World 破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya New World 追回 Himalaya New World 破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n19. 就第十九项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$270,000.00 的 Himalaya NY（喜马拉雅纽约）破产申请后转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549，应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya NY 转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya NY 追回 Himalaya NY 破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n20. 就第二十项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$156,000.00 的 Himalaya Shanghai（喜马拉雅上海）破产申请后转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549，应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya NY 转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya Shanghai 追回 Himalaya Shanghai 破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n21. 就第二十一项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$300,000.00 的 Himalaya UK（喜马拉雅英国）破产申请后转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549，应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya UK 转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya UK 追回 Himalaya UK 破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n22. 就第二十二项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$105,000.00 的 Himalaya WW（喜马拉雅WW）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Himalaya WW 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya WW 追回 Himalaya WW 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n23. 就第二十三项请求而言，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不低于 \\$105,000.00 的 Himalaya WW（喜马拉雅WW）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产的利益，从 Himalaya WW 追回 Himalaya WW 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n24. 就第二十四项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$105,000.00 的 Himalaya WW（喜马拉雅WW）申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code（《破产法典》）section 548(a)(1)(B) 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya WW 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya WW 追回该等 Himalaya WW 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n25. 就第二十五项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$105,000.00 的 Himalaya WW 申请前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就早于 April 4, 2020 的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya WW 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya WW 追回该等 Himalaya WW 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n26. 就第二十六项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$105,000.00 的 Himalaya WW 申请后转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya WW 申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya WW 追回该等 Himalaya WW 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值。\n\n27. 就第二十七项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$205,000.00 的 Vancouver（温哥华）申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A) 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Vancouver 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Vancouver 追回该等 Vancouver 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n28. 就第二十八项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$205,000.00 的 Vancouver 申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 予以撤销；就早于 April 4, 2020 的转让，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code，为债务人财产利益，自 Vancouver 追回该等 Vancouver 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n29. 就第二十九项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$205,000.00 的 Vancouver 申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Vancouver 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Vancouver 追回该等 Vancouver 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n30. 就第三十项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$205,000.00 的 Vancouver 申请前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就早于 April 4, 2020 的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Vancouver 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code，为债务人财产利益，自 Vancouver 追回该等 Vancouver 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n31. 就第三十一项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$50,000.00 的 Vancouver 申请后转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Vancouver 申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Vancouver 追回该等 Vancouver 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n32. 就第三十二项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$305,209.27 的 Golden Gate（金门）申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A) 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Golden Gate 追回该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n33. 就第三十三项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$305,209.27 的 Golden Gate 申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 予以撤销；就早于 April 4, 2020 的转让，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code，为债务人财产利益，自 Golden Gate 追回该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n34. 就第三十四项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$305,209.27 的 Golden Gate 申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Golden Gate 追回该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n35. 就第三十五项诉请，一项命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$305,209.27 的 Golden Gate 申请前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就早于 April 4, 2020 的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code，为债务人财产利益，自 Golden Gate 追回该等 Golden Gate 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n36. 就第三十六项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$530,000.00 的 Golden Gate 申请后转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Golden Gate 申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Golden Gate 追回该等 Golden Gate 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n37. 就第三十七项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$694,228.13 的 MOS（MOS）申请后转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 MOS 申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 MOS 追回该等 MOS 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n38. 就第三十八项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$582,400.65 的 Himalaya Ltd.（喜马拉雅有限公司）申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A) 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya Ltd. 追回该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n39. 就第三十九项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$582,400.65 的 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 予以撤销；就早于 April 4, 2020 的转让，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya Ltd. 追回该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n40. 就第四十项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$582,400.65 的 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya Ltd. 追回该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n41. 就第四十一项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$582,400.65 的 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就早于 April 4, 2020 的债权，则根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya Ltd. 追回该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n42. 就第四十二项诉请，(a) 一项命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$160,000.00 的 Himalaya Ltd. 申请后转让根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549 予以撤销；(b) 一项命令，责令撤销该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，自 Himalaya Ltd. 追回该等 Himalaya Ltd. 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值。\n\n43. 自该等转让之日起，按最高法定利率向受托人裁定判决前利息，以及法院在该等情形下认为公正、适当或衡平的其他及进一步救济。\n\n44. 法院在该等情形下认为公正、适当或衡平的其他及进一步救济。\n\n［本页其余部分有意留白］\n\n日期：February 15, 2024\nNew Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯）\nCHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE（第11章受托人）\n\n签署：/s/ Patrick Linsey*__________*\nDouglas S. Skalka（道格拉斯·S·斯卡尔卡）（ct00616）\nPatrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林齐）（ct29437）\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.（诺伊伯特、佩佩及蒙蒂思律师事务所）\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\ndskalka@npmlaw.com\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n第11章受托人代理律师\n\n附表 1A\n\nHimalaya Athena（喜马拉雅雅典娜）申请前转让\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 75 of 93\n\n附表 1B\n\nHimalaya Athena 申请后转让\n\nHimalaya Australia（喜马拉雅澳大利亚）申请前转让\n\nHimalaya Boston（喜马拉雅波士顿）申请前转让\n\n（有意省略）\n\n附表 5A\n\nHimalaya New World（喜马拉雅新世界）申请前转让\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2918 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 18:45:08 Page 80 of 93\n\n附表 5B\n\nHimalaya New World 申请后转让\n\nHimalaya NY（喜马拉雅纽约）申请后转让\n\nHimalaya Shanghai（喜马拉雅上海）申请后转让\n\nHimalaya UK（喜马拉雅英国）申请提交后转让\n\n（有意省略）\n附表10A\n\nHimalaya WW（喜马拉雅全球）申请提交前转让\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2918 已提交 02/15/24 已录入 02/15/24 18:45:08 第 86 页，共 93 页\n附表10B\n\nHimalaya WW申请提交后转让\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2918 已提交 02/15/24 已录入 02/15/24 18:45:08 第 87 页，共 93 页\n附表11A\n\nVancouver（温哥华）申请提交前转让\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2918 已提交 02/15/24 已录入 02/15/24 18:45:08 第 88 页，共 93 页\n附表11B\n\nVancouver申请提交后转让\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2918 已提交 02/15/24 已录入 02/15/24 18:45:08 第 89 页，共 93 页\n附表12A\n\nGolden Gate（金门）申请提交前转让\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2918 已提交 02/15/24 已录入 02/15/24 18:45:08 第 90 页，共 93 页\n附表12B\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2918 已提交 02/15/24 已录入 02/15/24 18:45:08 第 91 页，共 93 页\n附表13\n\nMOS申请提交后转让\n附表14A\n\nHimalaya Ltd.（喜马拉雅有限公司）申请提交前转让\n附表14B\n\nHimalaya Ltd.申请提交后转让","key_entities":["Himalaya","Je","Despins","HCHK","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Miles Guo","Yanping Wang","GTV","Saraca","GETTR","Paul Hastings","Pro Se","pro se"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":215,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":18889,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-02-15 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-02-15","updated_at":"2026-08-23 22:03:06"}