{"id":"court_ctb_2925_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":2925,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"UNKNOWN","filed_date":"2024-02-15","title":"B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15) | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET<br>(Instructions on Reverse)","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET<br>(Instructions on Reverse)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NUMBER<br>(Court Use Only)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|\n| PLAINTIFFS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | DEFENDANTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |  |  |\n| ATTORNEYS (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone No.)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | ATTORNEYS<br>(If Known)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |  |  |\n| PARTY (Check One Box Only)<br>□ Debtor<br>□ U.S.<br>Trustee/Bankruptcy Admin<br>□ Creditor<br>□ Other<br>□ Trustee                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | PARTY (Check One Box Only)<br>□ Debtor<br>□ U.S. Trustee/Bankruptcy<br>Admin<br>□ Creditor<br>□ Other<br>□ Trustee                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |  |  |  |\n| CAUSE OF ACTION<br>(WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE OF ACTION, INCLUDING ALL U.S. STATUTES INVOLVED)<br>NATURE OF SUIT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |\n| (Number up to five (5) boxes starting with lead cause of action as 1, first alternative cause as 2, second alternative cause as 3, etc.)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |\n| FRBP 7001(1) – Recovery of Money/Property<br>□<br>11-Recovery of money/property - §542 turnover of property<br>□<br>12-Recovery of money/property - §547 preference<br>□<br>13-Recovery of money/property - §548 fraudulent transfer<br>□<br>14-Recovery of money/property - other<br>FRBP 7001(2) – Validity, Priority or Extent of Lien<br>□<br>21-Validity, priority or extent of lien or other interest in property | FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability (continued)<br>□<br>61-Dischargeability - §523(a)(5), domestic support<br>□<br>68-Dischargeability - §523(a)(6), willful and malicious injury<br>□<br>63-Dischargeability - §523(a)(8), student loan<br>□<br>64-Dischargeability - §523(a)(15), divorce or separation obligation<br>(other than domestic support)<br>□<br>65-Dischargeability - other |  |  |  |\n| FRBP 7001(3) – Approval of Sale of Property<br>□<br>31-Approval of sale of property of estate and of a co-owner - §363(h)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | FRBP 7001(7) – Injunctive Relief<br>□<br>71-Injunctive relief – imposition of stay<br>□<br>72-Injunctive relief – other                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |  |  |  |\n| FRBP 7001(4) – Objection/Revocation of Discharge<br>□<br>41-Objection / revocation of discharge - §727(c),(d),(e)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | FRBP 7001(8) Subordination of Claim or Interest<br>□<br>81-Subordination of claim or interest                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |  |  |  |\n| FRBP 7001(5) – Revocation of Confirmation<br>□<br>51-Revocation of confirmation                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | FRBP 7001(9) Declaratory Judgment<br>□<br>91-Declaratory judgment                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  |  |  |\n| FRBP 7001(6) – Dischargeability<br>□<br>66-Dischargeability - §523(a)(1),(14),(14A) priority tax claims<br>□<br>62-Dischargeability - §523(a)(2), false pretenses, false representation,<br>actual fraud<br>□<br>67-Dischargeability - §523(a)(4), fraud as fiduciary, embezzlement, larceny<br>(continued next column)                                                                                                 | FRBP 7001(10) Determination of Removed Action<br>□<br>01-Determination of removed claim or cause<br>Other<br>□<br>SS-SIPA Case – 15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.<br>□<br>02-Other (e.g. other actions that would have been brought in state court<br>if unrelated to bankruptcy case)                                                                                                       |  |  |  |\n| □ Check if this case involves a substantive issue of state law                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | □ Check if this is asserted to be a class action under FRCP 23                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |  |  |\n| □ Check if a jury trial is demanded in complaint                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        | Demand \\$                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |  |  |  |\n| Other Relief Sought                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |\n\n#### **B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15)**\n\n| BANKRUPTCY CASE IN WHICH THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING ARISES |           |                                       |                             |  |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------|--|\n| NAME OF DEBTOR                                            |           | BANKRUPTCY CASE NO.                   |                             |  |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH CASE IS PENDING                         |           | DIVISION OFFICE                       | NAME OF JUDGE               |  |\n| RELATED ADVERSARY PROCEEDING (IF ANY)                     |           |                                       |                             |  |\n| PLAINTIFF                                                 | DEFENDANT |                                       | ADVERSARY<br>PROCEEDING NO. |  |\n| DISTRICT IN WHICH ADVERSARY IS PENDING                    |           | DIVISION OFFICE                       | NAME OF JUDGE               |  |\n| SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF)                      |           |                                       |                             |  |\n| DATE                                                      |           | PRINT NAME OF ATTORNEY (OR PLAINTIFF) |                             |  |\n\n#### **INSTRUCTIONS**\n\nThe filing of a bankruptcy case creates an \"estate\" under the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court which consists of all of the property of the debtor, wherever that property is located. Because the bankruptcy estate is so extensive and the jurisdiction of the court so broad, there may be lawsuits over the property or property rights of the estate. There also may be lawsuits concerning the debtor's discharge. If such a lawsuit is filed in a bankruptcy court, it is called an adversary proceeding.\n\nA party filing an adversary proceeding must also must complete and file Form 1040, the Adversary Proceeding Cover Sheet, unless the party files the adversary proceeding electronically through the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system (CM/ECF). (CM/ECF captures the information on Form 1040 as part of the filing process.) When completed, the cover sheet summarizes basic information on the adversary proceeding. The clerk of court needs the information to process the adversary proceeding and prepare required statistical reports on court activity.\n\nThe cover sheet and the information contained on it do not replace or supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, the Bankruptcy Rules, or the local rules of court. The cover sheet, which is largely selfexplanatory, must be completed by the plaintiff's attorney (or by the plaintiff if the plaintiff is not represented by an attorney). A separate cover sheet must be submitted to the clerk for each complaint filed.\n\n**Plaintiffs** and **Defendants.** Give the names of the plaintiffs and defendants exactly as they appear on the complaint.\n\n**Attorneys.** Give the names and addresses of the attorneys, if known.\n\n**Party**. Check the most appropriate box in the first column for the plaintiffs and the second column for the defendants.\n\n**Demand.** Enter the dollar amount being demanded in the complaint.\n\n**Signature.** This cover sheet must be signed by the attorney of record in the box on the second page of the form. If the plaintiff is represented by a law firm, a member of the firm must sign. If the plaintiff is pro se, that is, not represented by an attorney, the plaintiff must sign.\n\n# **ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET DEFENDANTS CONTINUATION PAGE**\n\n- 1. Lamp Capital LLC\n- 2. Golden Spring (New York) Limited\n- 3. Greenwich Land LLC\n- 4. HCHK Technologies Inc.\n- 5. HCHK Property Management Inc.\n- 6. Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.\n- 7. Hudson Diamond NY LLC\n- 8. Leading Shine NY Ltd.\n- 9. G Club International Limited\n- 10. G Club Operations LLC\n- 11. G Fashion\n- 12. G Fashion Media Group Inc.\n- 13. Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.\n- 14. Rule of Law Society IV Inc.\n- 15. GFNY Inc.\n- 16. Antion Development Limited\n- 17. Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.\n- 18. China Golden Spring Group (Honk Kong) Ltd.\n- 19. GF Italy LLC\n- 20. ACA Capital Limited\n- 21. Hamilton Investment Management Ltd.\n- 22. Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC\n- 23. Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd.\n- 24. Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.\n- 25. Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd.\n- 26. Himalaya International Reserves Ltd.\n- 27. Saraca Media Group Inc.\n- 28. G Fashion International Limited\n\n# **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                                                                              |                    | x                                            |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------|\n| In re:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | :<br>:             | Chapter 11                                   |\n| 1<br>HO WAN KWOK,<br>et al.,                                                                                                                                                                                                             | :<br>:             | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)                      |\n|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | :<br>Debtors.<br>: | (Jointly Administered)                       |\n| :<br>-----------------------------------------------------------<br>x<br>:<br>LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11<br>:<br>TRUSTEE,<br>:<br>:<br>Plaintiff,<br>:<br>v.<br>:<br>:<br>:<br>LAMP CAPITAL LLC,<br>et al.<br>:<br>:<br>Defendants.<br>: |                    | Adv. Proceeding No. [ ]<br>February 15, 2024 |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                                                                              | :                  | x                                            |\n\n# **COMPLAINT OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE SEEKING AVOIDANCE AND RECOVERY OF FRAUDULENT TRANSFERS, AND POSTPETITION TRANSFERS AMONG ALTER EGO ENTITIES AND RELATED RELIEF PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY CODE SECTIONS 544, 548, 549, AND 550 AND NEW YORK DEBTOR & CREDITOR LAW SECTIONS 273, 274, AND 276**\n\nLuc A. Despins, in his capacity as the chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in the\n\nchapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\") of Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\" or \"Kwok\"), files this adversary complaint (the \"Complaint\") against defendants, Lamp Capital LLC (\"Lamp Capital\"),\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nGolden Spring (New York) Limited (\"Golden Spring\"), Greenwich Land LLC (\"Greenwich Land\"), HCHK Technologies Inc. (\"HCHK Technologies\"), HCHK Property Management Inc. (\"HCHK Property\"), Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.(\"Lexington\"), Hudson Diamond NY LLC (\"Hudson Diamond\"), Leading Shine NY Ltd. (\"Leading Shine\"), G Club International Limited (\"G Club International\"), G Club Operations LLC (\"G Club Operations\"), G Fashion (\"G Fashion\"), G Fashion Media Group Inc. (\"G Media\"), Rule of Law Foundation III Inc. (\"Rule of Law\"), Rule of Law Society IV Inc. (\"Rule of Law Society\"), GFNY Inc. (\"GFNY\"), Anton Development Limited (\"Anton Development\"), Himalaya International Clearing Ltd. (\"Himalaya Intl.\"), China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd (\"China Golden\"), GF Italy LLC (\"GF Italy\"), ACA Capital Limited (\"ACA\"), Hamilton Investment Management Ltd (\"Hamilton\"), Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC (\"Hamilton Opportunity\"), Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd (\"Hamilton Capital\"), Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd (\"Himalaya Currency\"), Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd (\"Himalaya Financial\"), Himalaya International Reserves Ltd (\"Himalaya Reserves\"), Saraca Media Group Inc. (\"Saraca\"), and G Fashion International Limited (\"GFI\") (collectively, the \"Defendants\"), stating as follows:\n\n#### **NATURE OF ACTION**\n\n1. The Trustee commences this adversary proceeding to avoid and recover: (a) transfers of the Debtor's property prior to the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case; and (b) transfers of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate after the commencement of this Chapter 11 Case and not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or under Title 11 of the United States Code (the \"Bankruptcy Code\"). **The Trustee will not prosecute the claims in this Complaint upon the Court's determinations as to the Defendants' alter ego status (***i.e.***, that the Defendants are**\n\n# **the Debtor's alter egos and/or that the Defendants' property is beneficially owned by the Debtor) becoming final and/or no longer subject to challenge.<sup>2</sup>**\n\n2. The Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, transferred funds in the following amounts prior to the Petition Date (as defined herein) to the Defendants, as initial transferees, as set forth below (and as more fully set forth on the Schedules attached hereto and made a part hereof:\n\n- a. \\$49,376,818.35 to Lamp Capital;\n- b. \\$42,390,761.75 to Golden Spring;\n- c. \\$12,554,528.53 to Greenwich Land;\n- d. \\$1,784,915.29 to HCHK Technologies;\n- e. \\$30,930,373.91 to Lexington;\n- f. \\$18,704,990.00 to Hudson Diamond;\n- g. \\$9,075,849.25 to Leading Shine;\n- h. \\$72,654,694.57 to G Club International;\n- i. \\$110,000.00 to G Club Operations;\n- j. \\$3,420,750.00 to G Fashion;\n- k. \\$6,255,000.42 to G Media;\n- l. \\$1,100,000.00 to Rule of Law;\n- m. \\$200,000.00 to Rule of Law Society;\n- n. \\$9,600,000.00 to GFNY;\n\n<sup>2</sup> The Trustee has asserted, in *Despins v. ACA Capital Group Ltd., et al*., Adv. Proc. No. 24-05249 (the \"Omnibus Alter Ego A.P.\"), claims to determine that additional entities (which are not Defendants in this Complaint) were likewise alter egos of the Debtor and/or that the property of such additional entities was beneficially owned by the Debtor. The Trustee reserves the right to assert avoidance claims against these additional alter-ego entities based upon further progress in the Trustee's investigation.\n\n- o. \\$5,800,000.00 to Anton Development;\n- p. \\$109,166,373.33 to Himalaya Intl.;\n- q. \\$256,000.00 to China Golden;\n- r. \\$26,625,000.00 to ACA;\n- s. \\$3,209,061.04 to Hamilton;\n- t. \\$151,496,699.43 to Hamilton Opportunity;\n- u. \\$13,429,900.98 to Hamilton Capital; and\n- v. \\$7,524,940.00 to Saraca.\n\n3. These transfers were actually fraudulent, because the Debtor effectuated them as part of his \"shell game,\" and they were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors. Alternatively, these transfers were constructively fraudulent, because they were made when the Debtor was insolvent, and the Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in consideration thereof.\n\n4. Following the Petition Date, the Debtor, through his alter-ego shell companies, transferred funds to the Defendants as initial transferee, as follows:\n\n- a. \\$3,499,935.00 to Lamp Capital;\n- b. \\$2,054,984.06 to Golden Spring;\n- c. \\$550,000.00 to Greenwich Land;\n- d. \\$4,268,011.37 to HCHK Technologies;\n- e. \\$1,128,921.69 to HCHK Property;\n- f. \\$4,178,030.29 to Lexington;\n- g. \\$72,042,835.16 to G Club International;\n- h. \\$5,050,000.00 to G Club Operations;\n- i. \\$852,500.00 to Rule of Law;\n- j. \\$1,122,550.00 to Rule of Law Society;\n- k. \\$8,966,163.07 to GFNY;\n- l. \\$34,715,573.08 to Himalaya Intl.\n- m. \\$3,710,933.00 to GF Italy;\n- n. \\$31,232,657.00 to ACA;\n- o. \\$37,333,500.00 to Hamilton;\n- p. \\$192,899,889.20 to Hamilton Opportunity;\n- q. \\$44,164,391.38 to Hamilton Capital;\n- r. \\$180,000.00 to Himalaya Currency;\n- s. \\$51,712,920.60 to Himalaya Financial;\n- t. \\$267,000,000.00 to Himalaya Reserves; and\n- u. \\$3,350,025.77 to GFI.\n\n5. Because these postpetition transfers of estate property were not authorized by the Court or under the Bankruptcy Code, they are subject to avoidance and recovery under sections 549 and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **JURISDICTION AND VENUE**\n\n6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this adversary proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b).\n\n7. This adversary proceeding has been referred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a).\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 10 of 168\n\n8. The statutory predicates for the relief sought herein include sections 544, 548, 549, and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and New York Debtor & Creditor Law sections 273, 274, and 276 <sup>3</sup> or any other applicable state law equivalents.\n\n### **THE PARTIES**\n\n9. The Trustee is the chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court's order entered on July 8, 2022 [Case No. 22-50073 (the \"Main Case\") Docket No. 523].\n\n- 10. Lamp Capital is a Delaware limited liability company.\n- 11. Golden Spring is a Delaware limited liability company.\n- 12. Greenwich Land is a Delaware limited liability company.\n- 13. HCHK Technologies is a Delaware corporation.\n- 14. HCHK Property is a Delaware corporation.\n- 15. Lexington is a Delaware corporation.\n- 16. Hudson Diamond is a New York entity.\n- 17. Leading Shine is a Delaware entity.\n- 18. G Club International is an entity organized in the British Virgin Islands (\"BVI\").\n- 19. G Club Operations is an entity organized in Puerto Rico.\n- 20. G Fashion is an entity organized in the BVI.\n- 21. G Media is a Delaware entity.\n\n<sup>3</sup> All statutory references to New York Debtor and Creditor Law will hereinafter be referred to as \"N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law\". The New York Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (\"NYUVT\") replaced the New York Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act (\"NYUFC\") and became effective on April 4, 2020 and applies to transfers made or obligations incurred on or after April 4, 2020. With respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, the Trustee seeks relief in this action under the NYUFC and N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278.\n\n# Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 11 of 168\n\n- 22. Rule of Law is a Delaware entity.\n- 23. Rule of Law Society is a Delaware entity.\n- 24. GFNY is a Delaware entity.\n- 25. Anton Development is a Hong Kong entity.\n- 26. Himalaya Intl. is a British Virgin Islands entity.\n- 27. China Golden is a Hong Kong entity.\n- 28. GF Italy is a Delaware limited liability company.\n- 29. ACA is a Hong Kong entity.\n- 30. Hamilton is a British Virgin Island entity.\n- 31. Hamilton Opportunity is a Cayman Islands entity.\n- 32. Hamilton Capital is a United Kingdom entity.\n- 33. Hamilton Currency is an Australian entity.\n- 34. Himalaya Financial is an entity organized in the BVI.\n- 35. Himalaya Reserves is an entity organized in the BVI.\n- 36. Saraca is a Delaware entity.\n- 37. GFI is an entity organized in the BVI.\n\n#### **FACTS**\n\n#### **A. Chapter 11 Case**\n\n38. The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on February 15, 2022 (the \"Petition Date\") in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (the \"Bankruptcy Court\"), thus commencing the Chapter 11 Case.\n\n39. On March 21, 2022, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors in this Chapter 11 Case. No examiner has been appointed.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 12 of 168\n\n40. The Debtor's bankruptcy schedules, filed in March 2022 with the Bankruptcy Court, claimed that he owned \\$3,850 in assets and had incurred hundreds of millions of dollars of liabilities.<sup>4</sup> While the Debtor was, indeed, deeply indebted, his schedules failed to disclose the Debtor's property as held and/or transferred through his many alter-ego shell companies.\n\n41. On June 15, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court entered a memorandum of decision and order [Main Case Docket No. 465] directing the United States Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case. Pursuant to this order, the United States Trustee selected Luc A. Despins as the Trustee. On July 8, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order granting the appointment of Luc A. Despins as the Trustee in the Chapter 11 Case [Main Case Docket No. 523].\n\n#### **B. Debtor's Use of Shell Companies and Trustee's Adversary Proceedings**\n\n42. The Debtor used numerous alter-ego shell companies to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors.<sup>5</sup> For years, the Debtor has orchestrated a \"shell game,\" employing a\n\n<sup>4</sup> Schedule of Assets and Liabilities, at 1 [Main Case Docket No. 78].\n\n<sup>5</sup> There is a pending motion for summary judgment to determine that Greenwich Land is the alter ego of the Debtor in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. Greenwich Land, LLC* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5005 (the \"Greenwich Land A.P.\"), Docket No. 78). The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Greenwich Land A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5005, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Court has entered judgment to the effect that Golden Spring was the Debtor's alter ego. *See Despins v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018 (the \"Golden Spring A.P.\"), Docket No. 35). The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Golden Spring A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5018, Docket No. 1).\n\nDefault has entered against HCHK Technologies, HCHK Property and Lexington in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et. al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013 (the \"HCHK Entities A.P.\"), Docket No. 139), which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that HCHK Technologies, HCHK Property and Lexington were the alter egos of the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the HCHK Entities A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5013, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Trustee has commenced an adversary proceeding against Hudson Diamond, which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that Hudson Diamond was the alter ego of the Debtor. *See Despins v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023 (the \"Lamp Capital A.P.\")). The Trustee\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 13 of 168\n\nconvoluted web of shell companies, nominally owned by family members, lieutenants, and/or subordinates, but in reality, controlled by the Debtor. This shell game enabled the Debtor to use and spend and/or transfer millions of dollars of cash and other assets—while concealing his property from creditors.\n\n43. Since his appointment, the Trustee has commenced a number of adversary proceedings in the Chapter 11 Case to, among other things, establish that the Debtor's shell companies were his alter-egos and/or that such companies and their assets were equitably owned by the Debtor and in several such adversary proceedings the Bankruptcy Court has already granted such relief.<sup>6</sup>\n\n44. The fact patterns in these litigations consistently involve: (i) Debtor-controlled shell\n\ncompanies held by close family members and/or subordinates, (ii) assets purchased with cash from\n\nincorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Lamp Capital A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23- 5023, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Court has entered judgment to the effect that Lamp Capital was the Debtor's alter ego. *See Despins v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023 (the \"Lamp Capital A.P.\"), Docket No. 66). The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Lamp Capital A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 1).\n\nDefault has entered against Leading Shine in the adversary proceeding *Despins v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al.* (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023 (the \"Lamp Capital A.P.\"), Docket No. 13), which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that Leading Shine was the alter ego of the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in the Lamp Capital A.P. (Adv. Proc. No. 23-5023, Docket No. 1).\n\nThe Trustee has commenced the Omnibus Alter Ego A.P. against, among others, the remaining Defendants in this Complaint, which adversary proceeding seeks, among other things, a declaratory judgment that G Club Operations, G Club International, G Media, G Fashion, Anton Development, Rule of Law and Rule of Law Society were the alter egos of the Debtor. The Trustee incorporates by reference herein, the Trustee's Complaint filed in such adversary proceeding.\n\n<sup>6</sup> These include the following adversary proceedings: (i) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 22-05003]; (ii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Greenwich Land LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05005]; (iii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Mei Guo [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05008]; (iv) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. HCHK Technologies, Inc., et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05013]; (v) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Taurus Fund LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. No. 23-05017]; (vi) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Golden Spring (New York) Limited [Adv. Proc. 23- 05018]; and (vii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee v. Lamp Capital LLC, et al. [Adv. Proc. 23-05023].\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 14 of 168\n\nother Debtor-controlled entities and/or transferred to and among shell entities for no consideration, and (iii) the Debtor benefiting from and having control and dominion over such assets.\n\n#### **C. Debtor's Conduct to Hinder, Delay, and/or Defraud Creditors**\n\n45. In addition to the matters addressed in the Trustee's adversary proceedings, the Bankruptcy Court has found that the Debtor was the beneficial owner of Ace Decade Limited (and through it, Dawn State Limited) and that the Debtor controlled and employed Ace Decade Limited's nominee shareholder, Yvette Wang.<sup>7</sup>\n\n46. The Bankruptcy Court has also found that the \"G Entities\" (Gettr, G Fashion, G Music, GClubs, GNews and GEdu), the New Federal State of China and the Rule of Law Foundation, as well as other purportedly independent entities and organizations, were controlled by the Debtor<sup>8</sup> , led by the Debtor<sup>9</sup> and/or served \"the purposes of… and as business vehicles of\" the Debtor.<sup>10</sup>\n\n47. Prior to the Petition Date, Judge Liman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, an entity originally owned by one of the Debtor's chefs before its transfer to Debtor's daughter, was \"in essence, a shell corporation\" for the Debtor.<sup>11</sup>\n\n<sup>7</sup> Order Granting Motion to Hold Debtor in Contempt of Corporate Governance Order, ¶¶ 1, 4 (Jan. 24, 2023, Docket No. 1372 (\"Corp. Governance Contempt Order\").\n\n<sup>8</sup> *Corrected Memorandum of Decision Granting in Part Motion for Preliminary Injunction*, ¶ 3 (Adv. Proc. No. 22-05032, January 13, 2023 (\"The Debtor also controls Saraca Media Group and a related entity 'GTV'\").\n\n<sup>9</sup> *Id*. at ¶ 7 (\"The Debtor is the leader of The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF and Himalaya.\").\n\n<sup>10</sup> *Id*. (\"The Whistleblower Movement, NFSC, ROLF, GSeries, and Himalaya serve the purposes of the Debtor, serve as business vehicles for the Debtor, and their members are personally loyal to the Debtor.\").\n\n<sup>11</sup> *Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC*, No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL) 2021 WL 2554631, at \\*1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021).\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 15 of 168\n\n48. The Debtor has gone to great lengths to hinder and delay the collection efforts of one of his largest creditors, *i.e.*, Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P. (\"PAX\"). In 2017, PAX sued the Debtor in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the \"New York Court\"), Index No. 652077/2017 (the \"PAX Case\"), seeking judgment for monies owed. On February 3, 2021, PAX obtained a judgment from the New York Court against the Debtor in the sum of \\$116,402,019.57 (the \"PAX Judgment\"). PAX sought to enforce the PAX Judgment by levying the Debtor's assets—including the Lady May, which the Debtor falsely claimed was owned by his daughter, and the Debtor's luxury apartment in Manhattan, which the Debtor falsely claimed was held in trust for the Debtor's son. The Debtor's defiance of New York Court orders in postjudgment proceedings eventually resulted in the Debtor incurring contempt penalties of \\$134 million.\n\n49. The Debtor also used his alter egos as personal piggy-banks, funding the lavish lifestyle to which he and his family had become accustomed, while concealing assets in these alter egos from his creditors and hindering and delaying creditors from recoveries on their claims. The transfers that the Debtor effectuated through these alter egos perpetuated the Debtor's fraudulent scheme.\n\n50. The Debtor has testified before the Bankruptcy Court that he has insufficient assets to pay his liabilities and that his luxurious lifestyle is funded by his family through businesses nominally held by family members.<sup>12</sup> The Debtor scheduled only \\$3,850 in assets.<sup>13</sup>\n\n<sup>12</sup> Hearing on Debtor's Motion for Entry of Interim and Final DIP Orders (I) Authorizing the Debtor to Obtain Unsecured, Subordinated Postpetition Financing and (II) Scheduling Interim and Final Hearings, and (III) Granting Related Relief (Main Case, April 27, 2022)\n\n<sup>13</sup> *See* n.4\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 16 of 168\n\n51. In March 2023, the Debtor was arrested and remains confined pending his trial on federal criminal charges of, among other things, wire fraud, securities fraud, and money laundering.\n\n52. In its criminal indictment of the Debtor, the United States Government asserts that the Debtor and his co-defendants \"utilized more than approximately 500 accounts held in the names of *at least 80 different entities or individuals* to launder more than \\$1 billion in fraud proceeds.\"<sup>14</sup>\n\n53. The property of the Debtor's alter egos was at all times prior to the Petition Date property of the Debtor.\n\n54. At all times relevant herein, the Debtor conducted business in New York, New York, including direction of the prepetition transfers at issue in this Complaint.\n\n#### **D. Debtor's Shell Game and Fraud Continues Postpetition**\n\n55. As of the Petition Date, all of the Debtor's property held through his alter egos became property of the chapter 11 estate. *See* 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1).\n\n56. Following the Petition Date, the Debtor, with blatant disregard for the Bankruptcy Court and his obligations under the Bankruptcy Code, continued to effectuate transfers through numerous alter-ego shell companies.\n\n57. None of these postpetition transfers were authorized by the Bankruptcy Court nor were such transfers authorized under the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n<sup>14</sup> *See* Memorandum of Law of the United States of America in Opposition to Defendant Yanping Wang's Motion for Pretrial Release at 29, attached as Exhibit B in the Reply of Chapter 11 Trustee to G Club Operations LLC's Supplemental Objection to Trustee's Motion to Compel and Request for Related Relief (June 23, 2023, Main Case Docket No. 1934).\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 17 of 168\n\n#### **E. Transfers Made with Intent to Hinder, Delay, or Defraud Creditors**\n\n58. The Transfers (as defined herein) at issue in this Complaint were made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors inasmuch as they were all made through the Debtor's alter-ego shell companies operated as a part of the Debtor's shell game.\n\n59. The Debtor intentionally orchestrated his financial affairs in this manner in order to conceal and dissipate millions of dollars in assets while falsely pleading poverty to his many creditors. The Debtor claimed to be destitute while simultaneously spending heavily to maintain a billionaire lifestyle for himself and for his family members and close associates.\n\n60. The assets concealed and dissipated by the Debtor included funds that he obtained from the victims of his cryptocurrency, securities, and other fraud schemes. As a result of this conduct, the Debtor faces multiple felony fraud, money laundering, and racketeering charges in a criminal case pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. *See United States v. Ho Wan Kwok*, case no. 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.).\n\n61. The Debtor knew and intended that by concealing and dissipating his assets in this manner there would not be sufficient assets remaining to repay his creditors—including the many victims of his frauds. These transfers were thus necessarily made with the intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud the Debtor's creditors.\n\n#### **F. Transfers to the Defendant**\n\n62. Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor, using his alter-ego shell companies, or otherwise, transferred the Debtor's property to the Defendants (collectively, the \"Prepetition Transfers\"), as follows:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 18 of 168\n\na. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A1** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Lamp Capital.\n\nb. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A2** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Golden Spring.\n\nc. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A3** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Greenwich Land.\n\nd. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A4** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to HCHK Technologies.\n\ne. **Schedule A5** intentionally omitted.\n\nf. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A6** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Lexington Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Lexington.\n\ng. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A7** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Hudson Diamond.\n\nh. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A8** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Leading Shine.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 19 of 168\n\ni. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A9** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"G Club International Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to G Club International.\n\nj. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A10** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to G Club Operations.\n\nk. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A11** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"G Fashion Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to G Fashion.\n\nl. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A12** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"G Media Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to G Media.\n\nm. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A13** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Rule of Law.\n\nn. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A14** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Rule of Law Society.\n\no. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A15** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"GFNY Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to GFNY.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 20 of 168\n\np. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A16** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Anton Development Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Anton Development.\n\nq. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A17** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Himalaya Intl.\n\nr. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A18** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"China Golden Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to China Golden.\n\ns. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A19** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"ACA Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to ACA.\n\nt. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A20** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hamilton Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Hamilton.\n\nu. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A21** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Hamilton Opportunity.\n\nv. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A22** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Hamilton.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 21 of 168\n\nw. The Prepetition Transfers identified on **Schedule A23** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Saraca Prepetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Hamilton.\n\n63. Subsequent to the Petition Date, the Debtor, using his alter-ego shell companies, or otherwise, transferred property of the estate to the Defendants (collectively, the \"Postpetition Transfers\"), as follows:\n\na. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B1** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Lamp Capital.\n\nb. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B2** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Golden Spring.\n\nc. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B3** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Greenwich Land.\n\nd. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B4** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to HCHK Technologies.\n\ne. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B5** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to HCHK Property.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 22 of 168\n\nf. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B6** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Lexington Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Lexington.\n\ng. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B7** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"G Club International Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to G Club International.\n\nh. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B8** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to G Club Operations.\n\ni. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B9** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Rule of Law.\n\nj. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B10** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to Rule of Law Society.\n\nk. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B11** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"GFNY Postpetition Transfers\") were made by the Debtor through his alter egos to GFNY.\n\nl. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B12** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Himalaya Intl. by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 23 of 168\n\nm. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B13** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"GF Italy Postpetition Transfers\") were made to GF Italy by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\nn. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B14** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"ACA Postpetition Transfers\") were made to ACA by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\no. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B15** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hamilton Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Hamilton by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\np. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B16** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Hamilton Opportunity by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\nq. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B17** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Hamilton Capital by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\nr. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B18** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Himalaya Currency by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\ns. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B19** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Himalaya Financial by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 24 of 168\n\nt. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B20** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers\") were made to Himalaya Reserves by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\nu. The Postpetition Transfers identified on **Schedule B21** attached hereto and incorporated herein (the \"GFI Postpetition Transfers\") were made to GFI by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n64. At the time of the Prepetition Transfers and the Postpetition Transfers (collectively, the \"Transfers\"), the Debtor had outstanding obligations to creditors of the Debtor's estate.\n\n65. The Defendants were the initial transferees of the Transfers.\n\n#### **FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Lamp Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n66. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n67. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n68. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nLamp Capital Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 25 of 168\n\nc. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n69. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SECOND CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Lamp Capital)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n70. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n71. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 26 of 168\n\n72. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n73. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Lamp Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n74. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n75. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers.\n\n76. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers.\n\n77. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n78. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n79. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Lamp Capital)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n80. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 28 of 168\n\n81. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers.\n\n82. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers.\n\n83. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n84. At the time of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n85. The Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Lamp Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n86. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n87. The Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers were made to Lamp Capital by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n88. The Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n89. The Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 29 of 168\n\n90. The Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n91. The Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n92. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Lamp Capital plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n# **SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Golden Spring) Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n93. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n94. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n95. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-\n\nego shell company;\n\nb. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 30 of 168\n\nd. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n96. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Golden Spring) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n97. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n98. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n99. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nGolden Spring Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 31 of 168\n\na. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n100. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Golden Spring) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n101. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n102. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers.\n\n103. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers.\n\n104. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n105. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n106. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Golden Spring)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n107. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 33 of 168\n\n108. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers.\n\n109. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers.\n\n110. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n111. At the time of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n112. The Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Golden Spring) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n113. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n114. The Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers were made to Golden Spring by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n115. The Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n116. The Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 34 of 168\n\n117. The Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n118. The Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n119. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Golden Spring plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **ELEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Greenwich Land) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n120. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n121. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n122. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nGreenwich Land Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-\n\nego shell company;\n\nb. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 35 of 168\n\nd. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n123. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TWELFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Greenwich Land) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n124. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n125. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n126. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nGreenwich Land Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 36 of 168\n\na. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n127. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Greenwich Land) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n128. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n129. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers.\n\n130. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers.\n\n131. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n132. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n133. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FOURTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Greenwich Land) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n134. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 38 of 168\n\n135. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers.\n\n136. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers.\n\n137. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n138. At the time of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n139. The Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FIFTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Greenwich Land) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n140. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n141. The postpetition transfers identified on were made to Greenwich Land by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n142. The Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n143. The Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 39 of 168\n\n144. The Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n145. The Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\nPursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the\n\nGreenwich Land Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Greenwich Land plus interest\n\nthereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **SIXTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to HCHK Technologies) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n146. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n147. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n148. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an\n\nalter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 40 of 168\n\nd. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n149. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to HCHK Technologies) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n150. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n151. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n152. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 41 of 168\n\na. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n153. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to HCHK Technologies) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n154. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n155. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers.\n\n156. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers.\n\n157. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n158. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n159. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETEENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to HCHK Technologies) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n160. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 43 of 168\n\n161. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers.\n\n162. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers.\n\n163. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n164. At the time of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n165. The HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TWENTIETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to HCHK Technologies) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n166. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n167. The HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers were made to HCHK Technologies by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n168. The HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 44 of 168\n\n169. The HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n170. The HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n171. The HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n172. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from HCHK Technologies plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **TWENTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to HCHK Property) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n173. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n174. The HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers were made to HCHK Property by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n175. The HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n176. The HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy\n\nCourt or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n177. The HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n178. The HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n179. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from HCHK Property plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n# **TWENTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Lexington) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n180. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1- 65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n181. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n182. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Lexington Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 46 of 168\n\ne. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n183. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **TWENTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Lexington)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n184. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n185. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n186. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nLexington Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 47 of 168\n\nc. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n187. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TWENTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Lexington) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n188. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n189. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Lexington Prepetition Transfers.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 48 of 168\n\n190. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers.\n\n191. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n192. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n193. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TWENTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Lexington)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n194. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n195. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Lexington Prepetition Transfers.\n\n196. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the\n\nDebtor became insolvent as a result of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers.\n\n197. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 49 of 168\n\n198. At the time of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n199. The Lexington Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **TWENTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Lexington) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n200. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n201. The Lexington Postpetition Transfers were made to Lexington by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n202. The Lexington Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n203. The Lexington Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n204. The Lexington Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n205. The Lexington Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n206. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Lexington Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Lexington plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **TWENTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hudson Diamond) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n207. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1- 65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n208. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n209. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 51 of 168\n\nf. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was\n\nbeing sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n210. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TWENTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hudson Diamond)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n211. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n212. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his\n\nalter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n213. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an\n\nalter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 52 of 168\n\nd. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n214. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **TWENTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hudson Diamond) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n215. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n216. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers.\n\n217. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 53 of 168\n\n218. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n219. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n220. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTIETH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Hudson Diamond)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n221. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n222. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers.\n\n223. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers.\n\n224. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 54 of 168\n\n225. At the time of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n226. The Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Leading Shine) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n227. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n228. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n229. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-\n\nego shell company;\n\nb. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's\n\ncreditors;\n\nc. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 55 of 168\n\nd. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n230. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Leading Shine) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n231. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n232. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n233. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nLeading Shine Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 56 of 168\n\na. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n234. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Leading Shine) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n235. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n236. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers.\n\n237. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers.\n\n238. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n239. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n240. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n**(Transfers to Leading Shine)**\n\n**(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n241. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 58 of 168\n\n242. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers.\n\n243. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers.\n\n244. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n245. At the time of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n246. The Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club International) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n247. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n248. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n249. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the G Club International Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 59 of 168\n\na. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n250. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club International) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n251. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n252. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n253. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the G Club International Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 61 of 168\n\nf. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n254. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **THIRTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club International) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n255. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n256. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Club International Prepetition Transfers.\n\n257. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers.\n\n258. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n259. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 62 of 168\n\n260. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to G Club International)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n261. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n262. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Club International Prepetition Transfers.\n\n263. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers.\n\n264. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n265. At the time of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n266. The G Club International Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **THIRTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club International) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n267. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n268. The G Club International Postpetition Transfers were made to G Club International by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n269. The G Club International Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n270. The G Club International Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n271. The G Club International Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n272. The G Club International Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n273. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the G Club International Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from G Club International plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **FORTIETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club Operations) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n274. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 64 of 168\n\n275. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n276. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The G Club Operations Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The G Club Operations Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The G Club Operations Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n277. The G Club Operations Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FORTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club Operations)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n278. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n279. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n280. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 66 of 168\n\ne. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n281. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **FORTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club Operations) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n282. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n283. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers.\n\n284. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers.\n\n285. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 67 of 168\n\n286. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n287. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FORTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club Operations) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n288. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n289. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers.\n\n290. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers.\n\n291. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n292. At the time of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 68 of 168\n\n293. The G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FORTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Club Operations) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n294. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n295. The G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers were made to G Club Operations by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n296. The G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n297. The G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n298. The G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n299. The G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n300. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from G Club Operations plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **FORTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Fashion) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n301. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n302. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n303. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 70 of 168\n\nf. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n304. The G Fashion Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FORTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n**(Transfers to G Fashion)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n305. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n306. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter\n\negos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n307. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nG Fashion Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego\n\nshell company;\n\nb. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 71 of 168\n\nd. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n308. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FORTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Fashion) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n309. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n310. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers.\n\n311. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 72 of 168\n\n312. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n313. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n314. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FORTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to G Fashion)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n315. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n316. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers.\n\n317. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers.\n\n318. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n319. At the time of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n320. The G Fashion Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FORTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Media) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n321. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n322. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n323. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the G Media Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The G Media Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 74 of 168\n\ne. The G Media Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n324. The G Media Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FIFTIETH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to G Media)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n325. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-42 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n326. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos,\n\nwith the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n327. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nG Media Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell\n\ncompany;\n\nb. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 75 of 168\n\nc. The G Media Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The G Media Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The G Media Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n328. The G Media Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FIFTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to G Media) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n329. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n330. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Media Prepetition Transfers.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 76 of 168\n\n331. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the G Media Prepetition Transfers.\n\n332. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n333. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n334. The G Media Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FIFTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to G Media)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n335. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n336. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the G Media Prepetition Transfers.\n\n337. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the\n\nDebtor became insolvent as a result of the G Media Prepetition Transfers.\n\n338. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 77 of 168\n\n339. At the time of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n340. The G Media Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt.\n\n& Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **FIFTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n341. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n342. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n343. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 78 of 168\n\nd. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n344. The Rule of Law Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FIFTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n345. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n346. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n347. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nRule of Law Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 79 of 168\n\na. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n348. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FIFTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n349. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n350. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n351. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n352. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n353. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n354. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FIFTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n**(Transfers to Rule of Law)**\n\n**(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n355. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 81 of 168\n\n356. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n357. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n358. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n- 359. At the time of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n- 360. The Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **FIFTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n361. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n362. The Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers were made to Rule of Law by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n363. The Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n364. The Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 82 of 168\n\n365. The Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n366. The Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n367. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Rule of Law plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n# **FIFTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law Society) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n368. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n369. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n370. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an\n\nalter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 83 of 168\n\nd. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n371. The Rule of Law Society Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **FIFTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law Society) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n372. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n373. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n374. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nRule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 84 of 168\n\na. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n375. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SIXTIETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law Society) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n376. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n377. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers.\n\n378. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers.\n\n379. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n380. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n381. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SIXTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law Society) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n382. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 86 of 168\n\n383. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers.\n\n384. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers.\n\n385. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n386. At the time of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n387. The Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SIXTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Rule of Law Society) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n388. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n389. The Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers were made to Rule of Law Society by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n390. The Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 87 of 168\n\n391. The Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n392. The Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n393. The Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n394. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Rule of Law Society plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **SIXTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to GFNY) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n395. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n396. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n397. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nGFNY Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 88 of 168\n\nc. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n398. The GFNY Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SIXTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n**(Transfers to GFNY)**\n\n**(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n399. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n400. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 89 of 168\n\n401. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the GFNY Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n402. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SIXTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to GFNY) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n403. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n404. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the GFNY Prepetition Transfers.\n\n405. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers.\n\n406. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n407. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n408. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SIXTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to GFNY)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n409. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 91 of 168\n\n410. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the GFNY Prepetition Transfers.\n\n411. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n412. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n413. At the time of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n414. The GFNY Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SIXTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to GFNY) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n415. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n416. The GFNY Postpetition Transfers were made to GFNY by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n417. The GFNY Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n418. The GFNY Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 92 of 168\n\n419. The GFNY Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n420. The GFNY Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n421. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the GFNY Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from GFNY plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **SIXTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Anton Development) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n422. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n423. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n424. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nAnton Development Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an\n\nalter-ego shell company;\n\n- b. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n- c. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 93 of 168\n\nd. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n425. The Anton Development Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n# **SIXTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Anton Development) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n426. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n427. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n428. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nAnton Development Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 94 of 168\n\na. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n429. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTIETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Anton Development) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n430. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n431. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers.\n\n432. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers.\n\n433. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n434. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n435. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Anton Development) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n436. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 96 of 168\n\n437. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers.\n\n438. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers.\n\n439. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n440. At the time of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n441. The Anton Development Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Himalaya Intl.) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n442. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n443. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n444. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 97 of 168\n\na. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n445. The Himalaya Intl. Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTH-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Himalaya Intl.) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n446. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n447. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n448. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 99 of 168\n\nf. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n449. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SEVENTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Himalaya Intl.) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n450. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n451. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n452. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n453. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n454. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 100 of 168\n\n455. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Himalaya Intl.)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n456. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n457. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n458. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n459. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n460. At the time of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n461. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Himalaya Intl.) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n462. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n463. The Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Intl. by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n464. The Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n465. The Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy\n\nCourt or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n466. The Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of\n\nproperty of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n467. The Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n468. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya Intl. plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n# **SEVENTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to China Golden) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n469. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 102 of 168\n\n470. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n471. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the China Golden Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n472. The China Golden Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **SEVENTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to China Golden)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n473. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n474. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n475. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the China Golden Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 104 of 168\n\ne. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n476. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **SEVENTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to China Golden) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n477. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n478. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the China Golden Prepetition Transfers.\n\n479. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or\n\nbecame insolvent as a result of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers.\n\n480. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 105 of 168\n\n481. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur\n\nor believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n482. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **EIGHTIETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to China Golden.)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n483. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n484. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the China Golden Prepetition Transfers.\n\n485. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n486. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n487. At the time of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n488. The China Golden Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to GF Italy) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n489. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n490. The GF Italy Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Intl. by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n491. The GF Italy Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n492. The GF Italy Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n493. The GF Italy Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n494. The GF Italy Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n495. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the GF Italy Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from GF Italy plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to ACA) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n496. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 107 of 168\n\n497. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n498. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the ACA Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The ACA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The ACA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n499. The ACA Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to ACA) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n500. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n501. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n502. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the ACA Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The ACA Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The ACA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The ACA Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 109 of 168\n\ng. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n503. The ACA Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to ACA) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n504. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n505. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the ACA Prepetition Transfers.\n\n506. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the ACA Prepetition Transfers.\n\n507. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n508. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n509. The ACA Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to ACA) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n510. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n511. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the ACA Prepetition Transfers.\n\n512. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n513. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n514. At the time of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n515. The ACA Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y.\n\nDebt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to ACA) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n516. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 111 of 168\n\n517. The ACA Postpetition Transfers were made to ACA by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n518. The ACA Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n519. The ACA Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n520. The ACA Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n521. The ACA Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\nPursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the ACA Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from ACA plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n522. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n523. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos,\n\nwith the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n524. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHamilton Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 112 of 168\n\nb. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n525. The Hamilton Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n526. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 113 of 168\n\n527. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n528. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 114 of 168\n\n529. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **EIGHTY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n530. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n531. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers.\n\n532. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers.\n\n533. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n534. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n535. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **NINETIETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n536. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n537. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers.\n\n538. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n539. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n540. At the time of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n541. The Hamilton Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETY-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n542. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 116 of 168\n\n543. The Hamilton Postpetition Transfers were made to Hamilton by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n544. The Hamilton Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n545. The Hamilton Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n546. The Hamilton Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n547. The Hamilton Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\nPursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Hamilton Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Hamilton plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **NINETY-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Opportunity) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n548. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n549. The Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter\n\negos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n550. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an\n\nalter-ego shell company;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 117 of 168\n\nb. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n551. The Hamilton Opportunity Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETY-THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Opportunity) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n552. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 118 of 168\n\n553. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n554. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 119 of 168\n\n555. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETY-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Opportunity) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n556. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n557. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers.\n\n558. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers.\n\n559. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n560. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n561. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETY-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Opportunity) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n562. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n563. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers.\n\n564. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n565. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n566. At the time of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n567. The Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETY-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Opportunity) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n568. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 121 of 168\n\n569. The Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers were made to Hamilton Opportunity by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n570. The Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n571. The Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n572. The Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n573. The Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\nPursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Hamilton Opportunity plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **NINETY-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n574. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n575. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n576. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the\n\nHamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 122 of 168\n\nb. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n577. The Hamilton Capital Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETY-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n578. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 123 of 168\n\n579. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n580. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alterego shell company;\n\nb. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 124 of 168\n\n581. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **NINETY-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n582. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n583. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers.\n\n584. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers.\n\n585. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n586. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n587. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **ONE HUNDRETH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n588. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n589. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers.\n\n590. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n591. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n592. At the time of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n593. The Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **ONE HUNDRED-FIRST CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Hamilton Capital) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n594. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 126 of 168\n\n595. The Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers were made to Hamilton Capital by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n596. The Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n597. The Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy\n\nCourt or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n598. The Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n599. The Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n600. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Hamilton Capital plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **ONE HUNDRED-SECOND CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Himalaya Currency) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n601. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n602. The Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Currency\n\nby the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n603. The Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n604. The Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the\n\nBankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 127 of 168\n\n605. The Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n606. The Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n607. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya Currency plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n### **ONE HUNDRED THIRD CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Himalaya Financial) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n608. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n609. The Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Financial\n\nby the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n610. The Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n611. The Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the\n\nBankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n612. The Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n613. The Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 128 of 168\n\nPursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya Financial plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **ONE HUNDRED-FOURTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Himalaya Reserves) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n614. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n615. The Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers were made to Himalaya Currency by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n616. The Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n617. The Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n618. The Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n619. The Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n620. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from Himalaya Reserves plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n#### **ONE HUNDRED-FIFTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Saraca) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a))**\n\n621. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n622. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n623. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Saraca Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell company;\n\nb. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\nd. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 130 of 168\n\nf. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued,\n\nincluding by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n624. The Saraca Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(i)(A)\n\nof the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **ONE HUNDRED-SIXTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Saraca) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Actual Fraudulent Transfers pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n625. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n626. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were made by the Debtor, through his alter egos, with the actual intent to hinder, delay and/or defraud his creditors.\n\n627. The Debtor's intent to hinder, delay, and/or defraud his creditors in effectuating the Saraca Prepetition Transfers is shown by, among other things:\n\na. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were effectuated using an alter-ego shell\n\ncompany;\n\nb. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were concealed from the Debtor's creditors;\n\nc. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers were effectuated as part of the Debtor's \"shell game\" with the aid of the Debtor's family members and other lieutenants and subordinates that he controlled in an effort to conceal and shield assets;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 131 of 168\n\nd. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to benefit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\ne. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers furthered the Debtor's fraudulent conduct by enabling the Debtor to profit from his fraud without subjecting his property to the reach of his creditors;\n\nf. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was being sued, including by PAX in the PAX Case; and\n\ng. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or undercapitalized.\n\n628. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n#### **ONE HUNDRED-SEVENTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to Saraca) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a))**\n\n629. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n630. The Debtor received less than a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Saraca Prepetition Transfers.\n\n631. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers.\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 132 of 168\n\n632. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction, for which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n633. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur or believed he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debts matured.\n\n634. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers constitute fraudulent transfers and are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **ONE HUNDRED-EIGHTH CLAIM**\n\n#### **(Transfers to Saraca)**\n\n# **(Claim to Avoid and Recover Constructive Fraudulent Transfers Pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a))**\n\n635. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n636. The Debtor did not receive reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the Saraca Prepetition Transfers.\n\n637. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was insolvent or the Debtor became insolvent as a result of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers.\n\n638. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor was engaged in a business or transaction, or was about to engage in a business or transaction which any property remaining with the Debtor was an unreasonably small amount of capital.\n\n639. At the time of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, the Debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he would incur, debts that would be beyond his ability to pay as such debt matured.\n\n640. The Saraca Prepetition Transfers are avoidable by the Trustee pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and are recoverable pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n### **ONE HUNDRED-NINTH CLAIM**\n\n# **(Transfers to GFI) (Claim to Avoid and Recover Unauthorized Postpetition Transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a))**\n\n641. The Trustee repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1-65 as if fully set forth herein.\n\n642. The GFI Postpetition Transfers were made to Hamilton Capital by the Debtor through his alter-ego shell companies.\n\n643. The GFI Postpetition Transfers occurred after the Petition Date.\n\n644. The GFI Postpetition Transfers were not authorized by the Bankruptcy Court or by the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n645. The GFI Postpetition Transfers constituted the unauthorized transfer of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate.\n\n646. The GFI Postpetition Transfers are avoidable pursuant to section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n647. Pursuant to section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, the Trustee is entitled to recover the GFI Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof, from GFI plus interest thereon to the date of payment and the costs of this action.\n\n# *[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK.]*\n\n#### **PRAYER FOR RELIEF**\n\nWHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the Trustee respectfully requests that judgment be entered as follows:\n\n1. On the First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,376,818.35 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lamp Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n2. On the Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,376,818.35 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lamp Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n3. On the Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,376,818.35 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lamp Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 135 of 168\n\n4. On the Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that (a) the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$49,376,818.35 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lamp Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lamp Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n5. On the Fifth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,499,935.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lamp Capital Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lamp Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n6. On the Sixth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$42,390,761.75 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Spring for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n7. On the Seventh Claim,(a) an order declaring that the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$42,390,761.75 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 136 of 168\n\n(b) an order directing that the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Spring for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n8. On the Eighth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$42,390,761.75 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Spring for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n9. On the Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that (a) the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$42,390,761.75 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Spring Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Spring for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n10. On the Tenth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$2,054,984.06 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Golden Spring Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Golden Spring for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 137 of 168\n\n11. On the Eleventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$12,554,528.53 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Greenwich Land for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n12. On the Twelfth Claim, an order declaring that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$12,554,528.53 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Greenwich Land for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n13. On the Thirteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$12,554,528.53 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Greenwich Land for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n14. On the Fourteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$12,554,528.53 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 138 of 168\n\n2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Greenwich Land Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Greenwich Land for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n15. On the Fifteenth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$550,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Greenwich Land Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Greenwich Land for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n16. On the Sixteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,784,915.29 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from HCHK Technologies for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n17. On the Seventeenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,784,915.29 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 139 of 168\n\nTrustee's option, from HCHK Technologies for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n18. On the Eighteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,784,915.29 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from HCHK Technologies for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n19. On the Nineteenth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,784,915.29 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the HCHK Technologies Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from HCHK Technologies for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n20. On the Twentieth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$4,268,011.37 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the HCHK Technologies Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from HCHK Technologies for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 140 of 168\n\n21. On the Twenty-First Claim, an order (a) declaring that the HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,128,921.69 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the HCHK Property Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from HCHK Property for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n22. On the Twenty-Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Lexington Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$30,930,373.91 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Lexington Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lexington for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n23. On the Twenty-Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Lexington Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$30,930,373.91 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Lexington Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lexington for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n24. On the Twenty-Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Lexington Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$30,930,373.91 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Lexington Prepetition Transfers be set\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 141 of 168\n\naside; and (c) recovery of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, Lexington for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n25. On the Twenty-Fifth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Lexington Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$30,930,373.91 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Lexington Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lexington Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lexington for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n26. On the Twenty-Sixth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Lexington Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$4,178,030.29 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Lexington Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Lexington Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Lexington for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n27. On the Twenty-Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$18,704,990.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hudson Diamond for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 142 of 168\n\n28. On the Twenty-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$18,704,990.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hudson Diamond for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n29. On the Twenty-Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$18,704,990.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hudson Diamond for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n30. On the Thirtieth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$18,704,990.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hudson Diamond for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 143 of 168\n\n31. On the Thirty-First Claim, an order declaring that the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,075,849.25 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Leading Shine for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n32. On the Thirty-Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,075,849.25 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Leading Shine for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n33. On the Thirty-Third Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,075,849.25 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Leading Shine for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n34. On the Thirty-Fourth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,075,849.25 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 144 of 168\n\nN.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Leading Shine Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Leading Shine for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n35. On the Thirty-Fifth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the G Club International Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$72,654,694.57 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Club International Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club International for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n36. On the Thirty-Sixth Claim, an order declaring that the G Club International Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$72,654,694.57 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Club International Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club International for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n37. On the Thirty-Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the G Club International Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$72,654,694.57 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Club International Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club International Prepetition\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 145 of 168\n\nTransfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club International for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n38. On the Thirty-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the G Club International Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$72,654,694.57 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Club International Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club International Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club International for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n39. On the Thirty-Ninth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the G Club International Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$72,042,835.16 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the G Club International Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club International Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club International for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n40. On the Fortieth Claim, an order declaring that the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$110,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club Operations for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 146 of 168\n\n41. On the Forty-First Claim, an order declaring that the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$110,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club Operations for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n42. On the Forty-Second Claim, (a) an order declaring that the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$110,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club Operations for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n43. On the Forty-Third, an order declaring that (a) the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$110,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club Operations Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club Operations for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 147 of 168\n\n44. On the Forty-Fourth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,050,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Club Operations Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Club Operations for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n45. On the Forty-Fifth Claim, an order declaring that the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,420,750.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Fashion for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n46. On the Forty-Sixth Claim, an order declaring that the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,420,750.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Fashion for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n47. On the Forty-Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,420,750.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers be set\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 148 of 168\n\naside; and (c) recovery of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Fashion for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n48. On the Forty-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,420,750.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Fashion Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Fashion for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n49. On the Forty-Ninth Claim, an order declaring that the G Media Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$6,255,000.42 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Media Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Media for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n50. On the Fiftieth Claim, an order declaring that the G Media Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$6,255,000.42 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Media Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Media for the benefit of\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 149 of 168\n\nthe Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n51. On the Fifty-First Claim, (a) an order declaring that the G Media Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$6,255,000.42 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the G Media Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Media for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n52. On the Fifty-Second Claim, an order declaring that (a) the G Media Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$6,255,000.42 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the G Media Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the G Media Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from G Media for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n53. On the Fifty-Third Claim, an order declaring that the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,100,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hudson Diamond Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n54. On the Fifty-Fourth, an order declaring that the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,100,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 150 of 168\n\nCode and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n55. On the Fifty-Fifth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,100,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n56. On the Fifty-Sixth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,100,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n57. On the Fifty-Seventh Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$852,500.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 151 of 168\n\nTrustee's option, from Rule of Law for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n58. On the Fifty-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$200,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law Society for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n59. On the Fifty-Ninth Claim, an order declaring that the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$200,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law Society for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n60. On the Sixtieth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$200,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law Society for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 152 of 168\n\n61. On the Sixty-First Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$200,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Society Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law Society for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n62. On the Sixty-Second Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$1,122,550.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Rule of Law Society Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Rule of Law Society for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n63. On the Sixty-Third Claim, an order declaring that the GFNY Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,600,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the GFNY Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GFNY for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n64. On the Sixty-Fourth Claim, an order declaring that the GFNY Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,600,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 153 of 168\n\ndirecting that the GFNY Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GFNY for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n65. On the Sixty-Fifth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the GFNY Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,600,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the GFNY Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GFNY for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n66. On the Sixty-Sixth, an order declaring that (a) the GFNY Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$9,600,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the GFNY Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GFNY Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GFNY for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n67. On the Sixty-Seventh Claim, an order (a) declaring that the GFNY Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$8,966,163.07 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the GFNY Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GFNY Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GFNY for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 154 of 168\n\n68. On the Sixty-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,800,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Anton Development for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n69. On the Sixty-Ninth Claim, an order declaring that the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,800,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Anton Development for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n70. On the Seventieth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,800,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Anton Development for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n71. On the Seventy-First Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$5,800,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 155 of 168\n\nN.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Anton Development Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Anton Development for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n72. On the Seventy-Second Claim, an order declaring that the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$109,166,373.33 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Intl. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n73. On the Seventy-Third Claim, an order declaring that the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$109,166,373.33 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Intl. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n74. On the Seventy-Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$109,166,373.33 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, or the value\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 156 of 168\n\nthereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Intl. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n75. On the Seventy-Fifth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$109,166,373.33 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Intl. Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Intl. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n76. On the Seventy-Sixth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$34,715,573.08 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Intl. Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Intl. for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n77. On the Seventy-Seventh Claim, an order declaring that the China Golden Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$256,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the China Golden Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from China Golden for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 157 of 168\n\n78. On the Seventy-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that the China Golden Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$256,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the China Golden Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from China Golden for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n79. On the Seventy-Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the China Golden Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$256,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the China Golden Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from China Golden for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n80. On the Eightieth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the China Golden Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$256,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the China Golden Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the China Golden Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from China Golden for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n81. On the Eighty-First Claim, an order (a) declaring that the GF Italy Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,710,933.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 158 of 168\n\nBankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the GF Italy Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GF Italy Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GF Italy for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n82. On the Eighty-Second Claim, an order declaring that the ACA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$26,625,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the ACA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from ACA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n83. On the Eighty-Third Claim, an order declaring that the ACA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$26,625,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the ACA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from ACA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n84. On the Eighty-Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the ACA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$26,625,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the ACA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from ACA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 159 of 168\n\n85. On the Eighty-Fifth, an order declaring that (a) the ACA Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$26,625,000.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the ACA Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the ACA Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from ACA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n86. On the Eighty-Sixth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the ACA Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$31,232,657.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the ACA Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the ACA Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from ACA for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n87. On the Eighty-Seventh Claim, an order declaring that the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,209,061.04 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n88. On the Eighty-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,209,061.04 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 160 of 168\n\nHamilton Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n89. On the Eighty-Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,209,061.04 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n90. On the Ninetieth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,209,061.04 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n91. On the Ninety-First Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Hamilton Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$37,333,500.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 161 of 168\n\n92. On the Ninety-Second Claim, an order declaring that the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$151,496,699.43 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Opportunity for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n93. On the Ninety-Third Claim, an order declaring that the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$151,496,699.43 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Opportunity for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n94. On the Ninety-Fourth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$151,496,699.43 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Opportunity for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n95. On the Ninety-Fifth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$151,496,699.43 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 162 of 168\n\n2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Opportunity Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Opportunity for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n96. On the Ninety-Sixth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$192,899,889.20 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Opportunity Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Opportunity for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n97. On the Ninety-Seventh Claim, an order declaring that the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$13,429,900.98 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n98. On the Ninety-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$13,429,900.98 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 163 of 168\n\noption, from Hamilton Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n99. On the Ninety-Ninth Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$13,429,900.98 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n100. On the One Hundreth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$13,429,900.98 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Capital Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n101. On the One Hundred-First Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$44,164,391.38 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Hamilton Capital Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Hamilton Capital for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 164 of 168\n\n102. On the One Hundred-Second Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$180,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Currency Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Currency for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n103. On the One Hundreth-Third Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$51,712,920.60 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Financial Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Financial for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n104. On the One Hundred-Fourth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$267,000,000.00 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Himalaya Reserves Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Himalaya Reserves for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n105. On the One Hundred-Fifth Claim, an order declaring that the Saraca Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$7,524,940.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Saraca Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option,\n\n#### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 165 of 168\n\nfrom Saraca for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n106. On the One Hundred-Sixth Claim, an order declaring that the Saraca Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$7,524,940.00 are avoided pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and with respect to transfers prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Saraca Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Saraca for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n107. On the One Hundred-Seventh Claim, (a) an order declaring that the Saraca Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$7,524,940.00 are avoided pursuant to section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code; (b) an order directing that the Saraca Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Saraca for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n108. On the One Hundred-Eighth Claim, an order declaring that (a) the Saraca Prepetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$7,524,940.00 are avoided pursuant to N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276, and with respect to claims prior to April 4, 2020, N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278; (b) an order directing that the Saraca Prepetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the Saraca Prepetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from Saraca for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 and section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n### Case 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 166 of 168\n\n109. On the One Hundred-Ninth Claim, an order (a) declaring that the GFI Postpetition Transfers in an amount not less than \\$3,350,025.77 are avoided pursuant to section 549 of the Bankruptcy Code; and (b) an order directing that the GFI Postpetition Transfers be set aside; and (c) recovery of the GFI Postpetition Transfers, or the value thereof at the Trustee's option, from GFI for the benefit of the Debtor's estate pursuant to section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code;\n\n110. Awarding the Trustee pre-judgment interest at the maximum legal rate from the date of the filing of this Complaint to the date of judgment herein; and\n\n111. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just, proper, or equitable under the circumstances.\n\n#### [*Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank*]\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 167 of 168\n\nDated: February 15, 2024 New Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: /s/ *Patrick R. Linsey\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_* Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 dskalka@npmlaw.com plinsey@npmlaw.com *Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n# **SCHEDULES FILED UNDER SEAL**","body_zh":"B1040（FORM 1040）（12/15）\n\n对抗诉讼封面页\n（说明见背面）　对抗诉讼编号\n（仅供法院使用）\n\n原告　被告\n律师（律所名称、地址及电话号码）　律师\n（如已知）\n当事人（仅勾选一个方框）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国\n受托人/破产管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人　当事人（仅勾选一个方框）\n□ 债务人\n□ 美国受托人/破产\n管理人\n□ 债权人\n□ 其他\n□ 受托人\n诉因\n（简要说明诉因，包括所涉全部美国法条）\n诉讼性质\n（最多编号五（5）个方框，以主要诉因为1，第一个备选诉因为2，第二个备选诉因为3，依此类推。）\nFRBP 7001(1) – 追偿金钱/财产\n□\n11-追偿金钱/财产 - §542 财产交付\n□\n12-追偿金钱/财产 - §547 优先清偿\n□\n13-追偿金钱/财产 - §548 欺诈性转让\n□\n14-追偿金钱/财产 - 其他\nFRBP 7001(2) – 留置权的有效性、优先权或范围\n□\n21-留置权或其他财产权益的有效性、优先权或范围　FRBP 7001(6) – 可免责性（续）\n□\n61-可免责性 - §523(a)(5)，家庭扶养\n□\n68-可免责性 - §523(a)(6)，故意及恶意损害\n□\n63-可免责性 - §523(a)(8)，学生贷款\n□\n64-可免责性 - §523(a)(15)，离婚或分居义务\n（家庭扶养义务除外）\n□\n65-可免责性 - 其他\nFRBP 7001(3) – 批准出售财产\n□\n31-批准出售破产财团财产及共同所有人财产 - §363(h)　FRBP 7001(7) – 禁令救济\n□\n71-禁令救济 – 实施中止\n□\n72-禁令救济 – 其他\nFRBP 7001(4) – 对免责提出异议/撤销免责\n□\n41-对免责提出异议/撤销免责 - §727(c),(d),(e)　FRBP 7001(8) 请求权或权益从属\n□\n81-请求权或权益从属\nFRBP 7001(5) – 撤销确认\n□\n51-撤销确认　FRBP 7001(9) 确认判决\n□\n91-确认判决\nFRBP 7001(6) – 可免责性\n□\n66-可免责性 - §523(a)(1),(14),(14A) 优先税收请求权\n□\n62-可免责性 - §523(a)(2)，虚假借口、虚假陈述、\n实际欺诈\n□\n67-可免责性 - §523(a)(4)，受托人欺诈、侵占、盗窃\n（续见下一栏）　FRBP 7001(10) 对移送诉讼的裁定\n□\n01-对已移送请求权或诉因的裁定\n其他\n□\nSS-SIPA 案件 – 15 U.S.C. §§78aaa et.seq.\n□\n02-其他（例如，如与破产案件无关本应在州法院提起的其他诉讼）\n□ 如本案涉及州法实体问题，请勾选　□ 如主张本案为依据 FRCP 23 提起的集体诉讼，请勾选\n□ 如起诉状中请求陪审团审判，请勾选　请求金额 \\$\n请求的其他救济\nB1040（FORM 1040）（12/15）\n\n本对抗诉讼所由发生的破产案件\n\n债务人姓名　破产案件编号\n案件审理地区　分部办公室　法官姓名\n相关对抗诉讼（如有）\n原告　被告　对抗\n诉讼编号\n对抗诉讼审理地区　分部办公室　法官姓名\n律师（或原告）签名\n日期　律师（或原告）印刷体姓名\n说明\n\n提交破产案件将在破产法院管辖下设立一项“破产财团”，其中包括债务人的全部财产，无论该等财产位于何处。由于破产财团范围广泛，且法院管辖权十分宽泛，可能会就破产财团的财产或财产权利发生诉讼。也可能发生有关债务人免责的诉讼。如该等诉讼在破产法院提起，则称为对抗诉讼。\n\n提交对抗诉讼的一方还必须填写并提交表格1040，即《对抗诉讼封面页》，但该方通过法院案件管理/电子案件提交系统（CM/ECF）以电子方式提交对抗诉讼的除外。（CM/ECF 将表格1040中的信息作为提交程序的一部分予以采集。）填写完成后，封面页概述对抗诉讼的基本信息。法院书记官需要该等信息以处理对抗诉讼，并编制有关法院活动的必要统计报告。\n\n封面页及其所载信息并不替代或补充法律、《破产规则》或法院地方法规所要求的诉状或其他文件的提交及送达。该封面页大部分内容不言自明，必须由原告律师填写（如原告未由律师代理，则由原告填写）。每份提交的起诉状均须向书记官另行提交一份封面页。\n\n原告和被告。请按照起诉状中所列的名称准确填写原告和被告姓名。\n\n律师。如已知，请填写律师姓名和地址。\n\n当事人。请在第一栏中为原告勾选最适当的方框，并在第二栏中为被告勾选最适当的方框。\n\n请求金额。填写起诉状中请求的美元金额。\n\n签名。本封面页必须由登记在案的律师在表格第二页的方框内签署。如原告由律师事务所代理，必须由该所的一名成员签署。如原告自行诉讼，即未由律师代理，则必须由原告签署。\n对抗诉讼封面页被告续页\n\n1. Lamp Capital LLC（蓝普资本有限责任公司）\n2. Golden Spring (New York) Limited（Golden Spring（纽约）有限公司）\n3. Greenwich Land LLC（格林威治地产有限责任公司）\n4. HCHK Technologies Inc.（HCHK 科技公司）\n5. HCHK Property Management Inc.（HCHK 物业管理公司）\n6. Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.（列克星敦地产及人力配置公司）\n7. Hudson Diamond NY LLC（纽约哈德逊钻石有限责任公司）\n8. Leading Shine NY Ltd.（纽约领耀有限公司）\n9. G Club International Limited（G Club 国际有限公司）\n10. G Club Operations LLC（G Club 运营有限责任公司）\n11. G Fashion（G 时尚）\n12. G Fashion Media Group Inc.（G 时尚媒体集团公司）\n13. Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.（法治基金会 III 公司）\n14. Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会 IV 公司）\n15. GFNY Inc.（GFNY 公司）\n16. Antion Development Limited（安申发展有限公司）\n17. Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）\n18. China Golden Spring Group (Honk Kong) Ltd.（中国金泉集团（香港）有限公司）\n19. GF Italy LLC（GF 意大利有限责任公司）\n20. ACA Capital Limited（ACA 资本有限公司）\n21. Hamilton Investment Management Ltd.（汉密尔顿投资管理有限公司）\n22. Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC（汉密尔顿机会基金 SPC）\n23. Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd.（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）\n24. Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.（喜马拉雅货币清算有限公司）\n25. Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际金融集团有限公司）\n26. Himalaya International Reserves Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际储备有限公司）\n27. Saraca Media Group Inc.（萨拉卡媒体集团公司）\n28. G Fashion International Limited（G 时尚国际有限公司）\n\n美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院布里奇波特分部\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　:\n:　第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等，　:\n:　案件编号 22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。\n:　（联合管理）\n\nx\n:\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第11章\n:\n受托人，\n:\n:\n原告，\n:\n诉\n:\n:\n:\nLAMP CAPITAL LLC（蓝普资本有限责任公司），\n等。\n:\n:\n被告。\n:　对抗诉讼编号 [ ]\nFebruary 15, 2024\n-----------------------------------------------------------　:　x\n第11章受托人起诉状：请求撤销及追偿欺诈性转让，以及自我分身实体之间的破产申请后转让，并根据《破产法典》第544、548、549及550条和《纽约州债务人与债权人法》第273、274及276条请求相关救济\n\nLuc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯平斯）以在 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的第11章案件（“第11章案件”）中获任命的第11章受托人（“受托人”）身份，针对被告 Lamp Capital LLC（“Lamp Capital”）提交本对抗起诉状（“起诉状”），\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司）（税务识别号后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（杰尼弗控股公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 和 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（保尔·黑斯廷斯律师事务所）, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，收件人为 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 破产财团受托人（仅用于通知和通信）。\n\nGolden Spring (New York) Limited（“Golden Spring”）、Greenwich Land LLC（“Greenwich Land”）、HCHK Technologies Inc.（“HCHK Technologies”）、HCHK Property Management Inc.（“HCHK Property”）、Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.（“Lexington”）、Hudson Diamond NY LLC（“Hudson Diamond”）、Leading Shine NY Ltd.（“Leading Shine”）、G Club International Limited（“G Club International”）、G Club Operations LLC（“G Club Operations”）、G Fashion（“G Fashion”）、G Fashion Media Group Inc.（“G Media”）、Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.（“Rule of Law”）、Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（“Rule of Law Society”）、GFNY Inc.（“GFNY”）、Anton Development Limited（“Anton Development”）、Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.（“Himalaya Intl.”）、China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd（“China Golden”）、GF Italy LLC（“GF Italy”）、ACA Capital Limited（“ACA”）、Hamilton Investment Management Ltd（“Hamilton”）、Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC（“Hamilton Opportunity”）、Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd（“Hamilton Capital”）、Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd（“Himalaya Currency”）、Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd（“Himalaya Financial”）、Himalaya International Reserves Ltd（“Himalaya Reserves”）、Saraca Media Group Inc.（“Saraca”）及 G Fashion International Limited（“GFI”）（统称“被告”），陈述如下：\n\n诉讼性质\n\n1. 受托人提起本对抗诉讼，以撤销及追偿：(a) 于本第11章案件开始前对债务人财产作出的转让；以及 (b) 于本第11章案件开始后对债务人第11章破产财团财产作出的、未经破产法院或《美国法典》第11编（“破产法典”）授权的转让。在法院就被告的自我分身地位作出的裁定（即，被告为债务人的自我分身，和/或被告的财产由债务人享有受益所有权）已成为终局裁定和/或不再可受质疑后，受托人将不再就本起诉状中的请求权进行诉讼。2\n\n2. 债务人通过其自我分身空壳公司，于申请日（定义见下文）之前，向作为初始受让人的被告转让了如下金额的资金，如下所列（并如随附并构成本文件一部分的附表中更完整所述）：\n\na. 向 Lamp Capital 转让 \\$49,376,818.35；\nb. 向 Golden Spring 转让 \\$42,390,761.75；\nc. 向 Greenwich Land 转让 \\$12,554,528.53；\nd. 向 HCHK Technologies 转让 \\$1,784,915.29；\ne. 向 Lexington 转让 \\$30,930,373.91；\nf. 向 Hudson Diamond 转让 \\$18,704,990.00；\ng. 向 Leading Shine 转让 \\$9,075,849.25；\nh. 向 G Club International 转让 \\$72,654,694.57；\ni. 向 G Club Operations 转让 \\$110,000.00；\nj. 向 G Fashion 转让 \\$3,420,750.00；\nk. 向 G Media 转让 \\$6,255,000.42；\nl. 向 Rule of Law 转让 \\$1,100,000.00；\nm. 向 Rule of Law Society 转让 \\$200,000.00；\nn. 向 GFNY 转让 \\$9,600,000.00；\n\n2 受托人已在 Despins v. ACA Capital Group Ltd., et al., Adv. Proc. No. 24-05249（“综合自我分身对抗诉讼”）中提出请求，以认定其他实体（并非本起诉状中的被告）同样为债务人的自我分身，和/或该等其他实体的财产由债务人享有受益所有权。受托人保留基于其调查的进一步进展，针对该等额外自我分身实体主张撤销请求权的权利。\n\no. 向 Anton Development 转让 \\$5,800,000.00；\np. 向 Himalaya Intl. 转让 \\$109,166,373.33；\nq. 向 China Golden 转让 \\$256,000.00；\nr. 向 ACA 转让 \\$26,625,000.00；\ns. 向 Hamilton 转让 \\$3,209,061.04；\nt. 向 Hamilton Opportunity 转让 \\$151,496,699.43；\nu. 向 Hamilton Capital 转让 \\$13,429,900.98；以及\nv. 向 Saraca 转让 \\$7,524,940.00。\n\n3. 该等转让构成实际欺诈性转让，因为债务人作为其“空壳游戏”的一部分实施该等转让，且该等转让系意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈债务人的债权人而作出。或者，该等转让构成推定欺诈性转让，因为作出该等转让时债务人资不抵债，且债务人未就此获得合理等值的对价。\n\n4．在申请日之后，债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司，向被告作为初始受让人转移了如下资金：\n\na．向 Lamp Capital（蓝普资本）转移 $3,499,935.00；\nb．向 Golden Spring（金泉）转移 $2,054,984.06；\nc．向 Greenwich Land（格林威治地产）转移 $550,000.00；\nd．向 HCHK Technologies（HCHK科技）转移 $4,268,011.37；\ne．向 HCHK Property（HCHK地产）转移 $1,128,921.69；\nf．向 Lexington（列克星敦）转移 $4,178,030.29；\ng．向 G Club International（G俱乐部国际）转移 $72,042,835.16；\nh．向 G Club Operations（G俱乐部运营）转移 $5,050,000.00；\ni．向 Rule of Law（法治）转移 $852,500.00；\nj．向 Rule of Law Society（法治协会）转移 $1,122,550.00；\nk．向 GFNY（GF纽约）转移 $8,966,163.07；\nl．向 Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）转移 $34,715,573.08；\nm．向 GF Italy（GF意大利）转移 $3,710,933.00；\nn．向 ACA（ACA）转移 $31,232,657.00；\no．向 Hamilton（汉密尔顿）转移 $37,333,500.00；\np．向 Hamilton Opportunity（汉密尔顿机会）转移 $192,899,889.20；\nq．向 Hamilton Capital（汉密尔顿资本）转移 $44,164,391.38；\nr．向 Himalaya Currency（喜马拉雅货币）转移 $180,000.00；\ns．向 Himalaya Financial（喜马拉雅金融）转移 $51,712,920.60；\nt．向 Himalaya Reserves（喜马拉雅储备）转移 $267,000,000.00；以及\nu．向 GFI（GFI）转移 $3,350,025.77。\n\n5．由于这些对破产财产的申请日后转移未经本院或《破产法典》授权，故其可根据《破产法典》第549和550条予以撤销并追回。\n\n管辖权与审判地\n\n6．本院根据 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) 对本对抗程序具有事项管辖权。\n\n7．本对抗程序已根据 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) 移交本院审理。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 10 页，共 168 页\n\n8．本案所请求救济的法定依据包括《破产法典》第544、548、549和550条，以及《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、274和276³条，或任何其他适用的州法等同规定。\n\n当事人\n\n9．受托人系依据破产法院于 July 8, 2022 作出的命令，在第 11 章案件中担任第 11 章受托人[案件编号 22-50073（“主案”）案卷编号 523]。\n\n10．Lamp Capital 是一家特拉华州有限责任公司。\n\n11．Golden Spring 是一家特拉华州有限责任公司。\n\n12．Greenwich Land 是一家特拉华州有限责任公司。\n\n13．HCHK Technologies 是一家特拉华州公司。\n\n14．HCHK Property 是一家特拉华州公司。\n\n15．Lexington 是一家特拉华州公司。\n\n16．Hudson Diamond（哈德逊钻石）是纽约州实体。\n\n17．Leading Shine（领耀）是特拉华州实体。\n\n18．G Club International 是一家在英属维尔京群岛（“BVI”）设立的实体。\n\n19．G Club Operations 是一家在波多黎各设立的实体。\n\n20．G Fashion（G时尚）是一家在 BVI 设立的实体。\n\n21．G Media（G媒体）是特拉华州实体。\n\n3 今后对《纽约债务人与债权人法》的所有法定引用均称为“N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law”。《纽约统一可撤销交易法》（“NYUVT”）取代了《纽约统一欺诈性让与法》（“NYUFC”），并于 April 4, 2020 生效，适用于在 April 4, 2020 当日或之后作出的转移或承担的义务。对于 April 4, 2020 之前的转移，受托人在本诉讼中根据 NYUFC 及 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273、273a、275、276和278条寻求救济。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 11 页，共 168 页\n\n22．Rule of Law 是特拉华州实体。\n\n23．Rule of Law Society 是特拉华州实体。\n\n24．GFNY 是特拉华州实体。\n\n25．Anton Development（安东开发）是香港实体。\n\n26．Himalaya Intl. 是英属维尔京群岛实体。\n\n27．China Golden（中国金）是香港实体。\n\n28．GF Italy 是一家特拉华州有限责任公司。\n\n29．ACA 是香港实体。\n\n30．Hamilton 是英属维尔京群岛实体。\n\n31．Hamilton Opportunity 是开曼群岛实体。\n\n32．Hamilton Capital 是英国实体。\n\n33．Hamilton Currency（汉密尔顿货币）是澳大利亚实体。\n\n34．Himalaya Financial 是一家在 BVI 设立的实体。\n\n35．Himalaya Reserves 是一家在 BVI 设立的实体。\n\n36．Saraca（萨拉卡）是特拉华州实体。\n\n37．GFI 是一家在 BVI 设立的实体。\n\n事实\n\nA．第 11 章案件\n\n38．债务人于 February 15, 2022（“申请日”）向 United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut（美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院）（“破产法院”）自愿提交了根据《破产法典》第 11 章请求救济的申请，从而启动了第 11 章案件。\n\n39．于 March 21, 2022，Office of the United States Trustee（美国受托人办公室）在本第 11 章案件中任命了无担保债权人正式委员会。尚未任命审查员。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 12 页，共 168 页\n\n40．债务人于 March 2022 向破产法院提交的破产财产清单声称，其拥有 $3,850 的资产，并承担了数亿美元的负债。4 尽管债务人确实负债累累，但其财产清单未披露债务人通过其众多作为另我的空壳公司持有和／或转移的财产。\n\n41．于 June 15, 2022，破产法院作出备忘录裁决及命令[主案件卷编号 465]，指示美国受托人在第 11 章案件中任命一名第 11 章受托人。根据该命令，美国受托人选定 Luc A. Despins（吕克·A·德斯平斯）担任受托人。于 July 8, 2022，破产法院作出命令，批准任命 Luc A. Despins 担任第 11 章案件的受托人[主案件卷编号 523]。\n\nB．债务人对空壳公司的使用及受托人的对抗程序\n\n42．债务人使用众多作为另我的空壳公司，以阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人。5 多年来，债务人策划了一场“空壳把戏”，采用一个名义上由家庭成员、副手和／或下属拥有、但实际上由债务人控制的错综复杂的空壳公司网络。这场空壳把戏使债务人能够使用、支出和／或转移数百万美元现金及其他资产，同时向债权人隐瞒其财产。\n\n4 资产与负债清单，第 1 页[主案件卷编号 78]。\n\n5 在对抗程序 Despins（德斯平斯）诉 Greenwich Land, LLC（格林威治地产有限责任公司）（对抗程序编号 23-5005（“Greenwich Land 对抗程序”），案卷编号 78）中，现有一项待决的简易判决动议，旨在确定 Greenwich Land 系债务人的另我。受托人通过援引将其在 Greenwich Land 对抗程序中提交的起诉书（对抗程序编号 23-5005，案卷编号 1）纳入本文。\n\n本院已作出判决，认定 Golden Spring 系债务人的另我。见 Despins 诉 Golden Spring (New York) Limited（金泉〈纽约〉有限公司）（对抗程序编号 23-5018（“Golden Spring 对抗程序”），案卷编号 35）。受托人通过援引将其在 Golden Spring 对抗程序中提交的起诉书（对抗程序编号 23-5018，案卷编号 1）纳入本文。\n\n在对抗程序 Despins 诉 HCHK Technologies, Inc.（HCHK科技公司）等（对抗程序编号 23-5013（“HCHK实体对抗程序”），案卷编号 139）中，已对 HCHK Technologies、HCHK Property 和 Lexington 作出缺席登记；该对抗程序除其他事项外，寻求作出宣告性判决，认定 HCHK Technologies、HCHK Property 和 Lexington 系债务人的另我。受托人通过援引将其在 HCHK实体对抗程序中提交的起诉书（对抗程序编号 23-5013，案卷编号 1）纳入本文。\n\n受托人已对 Hudson Diamond 启动对抗程序；该对抗程序除其他事项外，寻求作出宣告性判决，认定 Hudson Diamond 系债务人的另我。见 Despins 诉 Lamp Capital LLC（蓝普资本有限责任公司）等（对抗程序编号 23-5023（“Lamp Capital 对抗程序”））。受托人通过援引将其在 Lamp Capital 对抗程序中提交的起诉书（对抗程序编号 23-5023，案卷编号 1）纳入本文。\n\n本院已作出判决，认定 Lamp Capital 系债务人的另我。见 Despins 诉 Lamp Capital LLC 等（对抗程序编号 23-5023（“Lamp Capital 对抗程序”），案卷编号 66）。受托人通过援引将其在 Lamp Capital 对抗程序中提交的起诉书（对抗程序编号 23-5023，案卷编号 1）纳入本文。\n\n在对抗程序 Despins 诉 Lamp Capital LLC 等（对抗程序编号 23-5023（“Lamp Capital 对抗程序”），案卷编号 13）中，已对 Leading Shine 作出缺席登记；该对抗程序除其他事项外，寻求作出宣告性判决，认定 Leading Shine 系债务人的另我。受托人通过援引将其在 Lamp Capital 对抗程序中提交的起诉书（对抗程序编号 23-5023，案卷编号 1）纳入本文。\n\n受托人已对包括本起诉书其余被告在内的主体启动综合另我对抗程序；该对抗程序除其他事项外，寻求作出宣告性判决，认定 G Club Operations、G Club International、G Media、G Fashion、Anton Development、Rule of Law 和 Rule of Law Society 系债务人的另我。受托人通过援引将其在该对抗程序中提交的起诉书纳入本文。\n\n43．自获任命以来，受托人已在第 11 章案件中启动多项对抗程序，以便除其他事项外，确立债务人的空壳公司系其另我，和／或此类公司及其资产在衡平法上由债务人所有；且在其中若干对抗程序中，破产法院已准许该等救济。6\n\n6 该等对抗程序包括如下程序：(i) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee（吕克·A·德斯平斯，第 11 章受托人）诉 HK International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC（香港国际基金投资〈美国〉有限责任公司）等[对抗程序编号 22-05003]；(ii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee 诉 Greenwich Land LLC 等[对抗程序编号 23-05005]；(iii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee 诉 Mei Guo（梅果）[对抗程序编号 23-05008]；(iv) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee 诉 HCHK Technologies, Inc. 等[对抗程序编号 23-05013]；(v) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee 诉 Taurus Fund LLC（金牛基金有限责任公司）等[对抗程序编号 23-05017]；(vi) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee 诉 Golden Spring (New York) Limited[对抗程序编号 23-05018]；以及 (vii) Luc A. Despins, Chapter 11 Trustee 诉 Lamp Capital LLC 等[对抗程序编号 23-05023]。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 14 页，共 168 页\n\n44．这些诉讼中的事实模式一贯涉及：(i) 由债务人控制、由近亲属和／或下属持有的空壳公司；(ii) 以来自其他债务人控制实体的现金购置和／或在空壳实体之间无对价转移的资产；以及 (iii) 债务人从该等资产中受益，并对其拥有控制权和支配权。\n\nC．债务人为阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈债权人而实施的行为\n\n45．除受托人对抗程序中所处理的事项外，破产法院还认定，债务人是 Ace Decade Limited（艾斯十年有限公司）（以及通过该公司持有的 Dawn State Limited（曙光州有限公司））的实益所有人，且债务人控制并利用了 Ace Decade Limited 的名义股东 Yvette Wang（伊薇特·王）。7\n\n46．破产法院还认定，“G实体”（Gettr（盖特）、G Fashion、G Music（G音乐）、GClubs（G俱乐部）、GNews（G新闻）和 GEdu（G教育））、New Federal State of China（新中国联邦）和 Rule of Law Foundation（法治基金会），以及其他表面上独立的实体和组织，均由债务人控制8、由债务人领导9，和／或“服务于债务人的目的……并作为债务人的业务工具”。10\n\n47．在申请日之前，United States District Court for the Southern District of New York（美国纽约南区联邦地区法院）的 Liman 法官认定，Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方利润有限公司）——该实体最初由债务人的一名厨师所有，后转让给债务人的女儿——实质上是债务人的“一家空壳公司”。11\n\n7 准许要求裁定债务人藐视公司治理命令的动议之命令，第¶¶ 1、4段（Jan. 24, 2023，案卷编号 1372（“公司治理藐视法庭命令”）。\n\n8 经更正的部分准许初步禁令动议的备忘录裁决，第¶ 3段（对抗程序编号 22-05032，January 13, 2023（“债务人还控制 Saraca Media Group（萨拉卡媒体集团）及关联实体‘GTV’”）。\n\n9 同上，第 ¶ 7 段（“债务人是 The Whistleblower Movement（吹哨人运动）、NFSC、ROLF 和 Himalaya（喜马拉雅）的领导人。”）。\n\n10 同上（“The Whistleblower Movement、NFSC、ROLF、GSeries 和 Himalaya 服务于债务人的目的，充当债务人的商业工具，其成员个人忠于债务人。”）。\n\n11 Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd.（东方盈利有限公司）诉 Strategic Vision US LLC（美国战略愿景有限责任公司），No. 18-CV-2185 (LJL), 2021 WL 2554631, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2021)。\n案件 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 录入，第 15 页，共 168 页\n\n48. 债务人为阻碍和拖延其最大债权人之一 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund, L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金，有限合伙企业，以下简称“PAX”）的追偿努力，已竭尽所能。2017 年，PAX 在纽约州最高法院（以下简称“纽约法院”）提起诉讼，案卷索引号为 652077/2017（以下简称“PAX 案件”），请求就所欠款项作出判决。2021 年 2 月 3 日，PAX 从纽约法院获得针对债务人的判决，金额为 $116,402,019.57（以下简称“PAX 判决”）。PAX 试图通过扣押债务人的资产来执行 PAX 判决——包括 Lady May（五月女士号），债务人谎称该游艇归其女儿所有；以及债务人在曼哈顿的豪华公寓，债务人谎称该公寓由信托为债务人的儿子持有。债务人在判决后程序中蔑视纽约法院命令，最终导致其被处以 $134 million 的藐视法庭罚款。\n\n49. 债务人还将其另我实体用作个人钱袋，在向债权人隐匿这些另我实体中的资产并阻碍和拖延债权人就其债权获得清偿的同时，为其本人及其家人已习惯的奢侈生活方式提供资金。债务人通过这些另我实体实施的转让延续了债务人的欺诈计划。\n\n50. 债务人已在破产法院作证称，其资产不足以偿还其负债，其奢侈生活方式由其家人通过名义上由家庭成员持有的企业提供资金。12 债务人仅申报 $3,850 的资产。13\n\n12 关于债务人提出的动议的听证会，该动议请求作出临时及最终 DIP 命令：(I) 授权债务人取得无担保、次级的申请后融资；(II) 安排临时及最终听证会；及 (III) 准予相关救济（主案，April 27, 2022）\n\n13 见注释 4\n案件 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 录入，第 16 页，共 168 页\n\n51. 2023 年 3 月，债务人被捕，并在等待就包括电信欺诈、证券欺诈和洗钱在内的联邦刑事指控受审期间持续被羁押。\n\n52. 美国政府在针对债务人的刑事起诉书中主张，债务人及其共同被告“利用以至少 80 个不同实体或个人名义持有的约 500 多个账户，对超过 $1 billion 的欺诈所得进行洗钱。”14\n\n53. 在破产申请日之前的任何时候，债务人另我实体的财产均为债务人的财产。\n\n54. 在与本案有关的所有期间，债务人在纽约州纽约市开展业务，包括指挥实施本起诉状所涉的申请前转让。\nD. 债务人的障眼法和欺诈在申请后持续进行\n\n55. 截至破产申请日，债务人通过其另我实体持有的全部财产均成为第 11 章破产财产。见 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1)。\n\n56. 破产申请日后，债务人公然无视破产法院及其根据《破产法》承担的义务，继续通过众多作为其另我实体的空壳公司实施转让。\n\n57. 上述申请后转让均未经破产法院授权，亦未获《破产法》授权。\n\n14 见《美利坚合众国反对被告 Yanping Wang（王艳萍）审前释放动议的法律备忘录》第 29 页，作为附件 B 附于第 11 章受托人对 G Club Operations LLC（G Club 运营有限责任公司）就受托人强制履行动议及相关救济请求所提补充异议的答复（June 23, 2023，主案案卷编号 1934）。\n案件 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 录入，第 17 页，共 168 页\nE. 意图阻碍、拖延或欺诈债权人的转让\n\n58. 本起诉状所涉的转让（定义如下）均系通过作为债务人障眼法一部分而运作的债务人另我实体空壳公司作出，故其作出时具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图。\n\n59. 债务人故意以此方式安排其财务事务，以便在向其众多债权人虚假声称贫困的同时，隐匿并耗散数百万美元的资产。债务人声称自己身无分文，却同时大量支出，以维持其本人、家庭成员及亲密关联人士的亿万富翁生活方式。\n\n60. 债务人隐匿并耗散的资产包括其从加密货币、证券及其他欺诈计划的受害人处取得的资金。由于该等行为，债务人在 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York（美国纽约南区联邦地区法院）正在审理的一宗刑事案件中面临多项重罪欺诈、洗钱和敲诈勒索指控。见 United States v. Ho Wan Kwok（美利坚合众国诉郭文贵），案号 1:23-cr-00118-AT [ECF No. 215] (Jan. 3, 2024 S.D.N.Y.)。\n\n61. 债务人明知并意图通过以此方式隐匿和耗散其资产，将不会有足够的剩余资产偿还其债权人——包括其众多欺诈行为的受害人。因此，这些转让必然是出于阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈债务人债权人的意图而作出。\nF. 向被告作出的转让\n\n62. 在破产申请日之前，债务人通过其另我实体空壳公司或以其他方式，向被告转让债务人的财产（统称“申请前转让”），如下：\n案件 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 录入，第 18 页，共 168 页\n\na. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A1 中列明的申请前转让（“Lamp Capital（灯资本）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Lamp Capital 作出。\n\nb. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A2 中列明的申请前转让（“Golden Spring（金泉）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Golden Spring 作出。\n\nc. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A3 中列明的申请前转让（“Greenwich Land（格林尼治土地）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Greenwich Land 作出。\n\nd. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A4 中列明的申请前转让（“HCHK Technologies（HCHK 科技）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 HCHK Technologies 作出。\n\ne. 附表 A5 被有意省略。\n\nf. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A6 中列明的申请前转让（“Lexington（列克星敦）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Lexington 作出。\n\ng. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A7 中列明的申请前转让（“Hudson Diamond（哈德逊钻石）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Hudson Diamond 作出。\n\nh. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A8 中列明的申请前转让（“Leading Shine（领耀）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Leading Shine 作出。\n案件 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 录入，第 19 页，共 168 页\n\ni. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A9 中列明的申请前转让（“G Club International（G Club 国际）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 G Club International 作出。\n\nj. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A10 中列明的申请前转让（“G Club Operations 申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 G Club Operations 作出。\n\nk. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A11 中列明的申请前转让（“G Fashion（G 时尚）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 G Fashion 作出。\n\nl. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A12 中列明的申请前转让（“G Media（G 媒体）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 G Media 作出。\n\nm. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A13 中列明的申请前转让（“Rule of Law（法治）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Rule of Law 作出。\n\nn. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A14 中列明的申请前转让（“Rule of Law Society（法治协会）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Rule of Law Society 作出。\n\no. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A15 中列明的申请前转让（“GFNY 申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 GFNY。\n案件 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 录入，第 20 页，共 168 页\n\np. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A16 中列明的申请前转让（“Anton Development（安东开发）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Anton Development 作出。\n\nq. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A17 中列明的申请前转让（“Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Himalaya Intl. 作出。\n\nr. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A18 中列明的申请前转让（“China Golden（中国金）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 China Golden 作出。\n\ns. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A19 中列明的申请前转让（“ACA 申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 ACA 作出。\n\nt. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A20 中列明的申请前转让（“Hamilton（汉密尔顿）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Hamilton 作出。\n\nu. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A21 中列明的申请前转让（“Hamilton Opportunity（汉密尔顿机会）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Hamilton Opportunity 作出。\n\nv. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A22 中列明的申请前转让（“Hamilton Capital（汉密尔顿资本）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Hamilton 作出。\n案件 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 录入，第 21 页，共 168 页\n\nw. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 A23 中列明的申请前转让（“Saraca（娑罗双）申请前转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Hamilton 作出。\n\n63. 在破产申请日之后，债务人通过其另我实体空壳公司或以其他方式，向被告转让破产财产（统称“申请后转让”），如下：\n\na. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 B1 中列明的申请后转让（“Lamp Capital 申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Lamp Capital 作出。\n\nb. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 B2 中列明的申请后转让（“Golden Spring 申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Golden Spring 作出。\n\nc. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 B3 中列明的申请后转让（“Greenwich Land 申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 Greenwich Land 作出。\n\nd. 本文所附并通过援引并入本文的附表 B4 中列明的申请后转让（“HCHK Technologies 申请后转让”），系债务人通过其另我实体向 HCHK Technologies 作出。\n\ne. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B5 所列的申请后转让（“HCHK Property（HCHK地产）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身实体向 HCHK Property 作出。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 22 页，共 168 页\n\nf. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B6 所列的申请后转让（“Lexington（列克星敦）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身实体向 Lexington 作出。\n\ng. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B7 所列的申请后转让（“G Club International（G Club国际）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身实体向 G Club International 作出。\n\nh. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B8 所列的申请后转让（“G Club Operations（G Club运营）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身实体向 G Club Operations 作出。\n\ni. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B9 所列的申请后转让（“Rule of Law（法治）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身实体向 Rule of Law 作出。\n\nj. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B10 所列的申请后转让（“Rule of Law Society（法治协会）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身实体向 Rule of Law Society 作出。\n\nk. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B11 所列的申请后转让（“GFNY（GFNY）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身实体向 GFNY 作出。\n\nl. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B12 所列的申请后转让（“Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Himalaya Intl. 作出。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 23 页，共 168 页\n\nm. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B13 所列的申请后转让（“GF Italy（GF意大利）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 GF Italy 作出。\n\nn. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B14 所列的申请后转让（“ACA（ACA）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 ACA 作出。\n\no. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B15 所列的申请后转让（“Hamilton（汉密尔顿）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Hamilton 作出。\n\np. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B16 所列的申请后转让（“Hamilton Opportunity（汉密尔顿机会）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Hamilton Opportunity 作出。\n\nq. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B17 所列的申请后转让（“Hamilton Capital（汉密尔顿资本）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Hamilton Capital 作出。\n\nr. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B18 所列的申请后转让（“Himalaya Currency（喜马拉雅货币）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Himalaya Currency 作出。\n\ns. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B19 所列的申请后转让（“Himalaya Financial（喜马拉雅金融）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Himalaya Financial 作出。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 24 页，共 168 页\n\nt. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B20 所列的申请后转让（“Himalaya Reserves（喜马拉雅储备）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Himalaya Reserves 作出。\n\nu. 本文件所附并通过援引纳入本文的附表 B21 所列的申请后转让（“GFI（GFI）申请后转让”），系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 GFI 作出。\n\n64. 在申请前转让及申请后转让（合称“转让”）发生时，债务人对债务人财产的债权人负有未清偿债务。\n\n65. 被告系该等转让的初始受让人。\n\n第一项请求\n\n（向 Lamp Capital（蓝普资本）的转让）（根据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条和第 550(a) 条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n66. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n67. Lamp Capital 申请前转让系债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n68. 债务人在实施 Lamp Capital 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由下列事实证明：\n\na. Lamp Capital 申请前转让系通过替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Lamp Capital 申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 25 页，共 168 页\n\nc. Lamp Capital 申请前转让是债务人为隐匿和保护资产而进行的“空壳把戏”的一部分，并有债务人控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属协助实施；\n\nd. Lamp Capital 申请前转让使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获益，同时不使其财产处于其债权人可追索的范围之内，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Lamp Capital 申请前转让使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获利，同时不使其财产处于其债权人可追索的范围之内，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n69. 受托人可根据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条撤销 Lamp Capital 申请前转让，并可根据《破产法典》第 550(a) 条追回该等转让。\n\n第二项请求\n\n（向 Lamp Capital 的转让）\n\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、274 和 276 条以及《破产法典》第 544(b) 条和第 550(a) 条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n70. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n71. Lamp Capital 申请前转让系债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 26 页，共 168 页\n\n72. 债务人在实施 Lamp Capital 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由下列事实证明：\n\na. Lamp Capital 申请前转让系通过替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Lamp Capital 申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Lamp Capital 申请前转让是债务人为隐匿和保护资产而进行的“空壳把戏”的一部分，并有债务人控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属协助实施；\n\nd. Lamp Capital 申请前转让使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获益，同时不使其财产处于其债权人可追索的范围之内，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Lamp Capital 申请前转让使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获利，同时不使其财产处于其债权人可追索的范围之内，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n73. 受托人可根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(1)、274 和 276 条及《破产法典》第 544(b) 条撤销 Lamp Capital 申请前转让，并可根据《破产法典》第 550(a) 条追回该等转让。\n\n第三项请求\n\n（向 Lamp Capital 的转让）（根据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条和第 550(a) 条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n74. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n75. 债务人就 Lamp Capital 申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n76. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力，或因 Lamp Capital 申请前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n77. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产均构成数额不合理偏低的资本。\n\n78. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或者相信其将产生在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n79. Lamp Capital 申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条撤销该等转让，并可根据《破产法典》第 550(a) 条追回该等转让。\n\n第四项请求\n\n（向 Lamp Capital 的转让）\n\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 和 276 条以及《破产法典》第 544(b) 条和第 550(a) 条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n80. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 28 页，共 168 页\n\n81. 债务人未就 Lamp Capital 申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n82. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力，或债务人因 Lamp Capital 申请前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n83. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产均构成数额不合理偏低的资本。\n\n84. 在 Lamp Capital 申请前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或者相信或有合理理由应当相信其将产生在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n85. 受托人可根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 和 276 条及《破产法典》第 544(b) 条撤销 Lamp Capital 申请前转让，并可根据《破产法典》第 550(a) 条追回该等转让。\n\n第五项请求\n\n（向 Lamp Capital 的转让）（根据《破产法典》第 549 条和第 550(a) 条请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让）\n\n86. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n87. Lamp Capital 申请后转让系债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 Lamp Capital 作出。\n\n88. Lamp Capital 申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n89. Lamp Capital 申请后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 29 页，共 168 页\n\n90. Lamp Capital 申请后转让构成对债务人第 11 章财产中财产的未经授权转让。\n\n91. Lamp Capital 申请后转让可根据《破产法典》第 549(a) 条予以撤销。\n\n92. 根据《破产法》第 550(a) 条，受托人有权向 Lamp Capital（兰普资本）追回 Lamp Capital 申请后转让，或其价值，并加计至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第六项请求\n（向 Golden Spring（金泉）的转让）根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条及第 550(a) 条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让\n\n93. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此完整载明。\n\n94. Golden Spring 申请前转让由债务人通过其另我实体作出，其实际意图是阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人。\n\n95. 债务人在实施 Golden Spring 申请前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，可由包括下列情形在内的事实证明：\n\na. Golden Spring 申请前转让系利用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Golden Spring 申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Golden Spring 申请前转让系作为债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分实施，并在债务人为隐匿和保护资产而控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下进行；\n\n案号 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 30 页，共 168 页\n\nd. Golden Spring 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Golden Spring 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n96. 根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条，受托人可撤销 Golden Spring 申请前转让；根据《破产法》第 550(a) 条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第七项请求\n（向 Golden Spring 的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、274 及 276 条，以及《破产法》第 544(b) 条及第 550(a) 条，请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n97. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此完整载明。\n\n98. Golden Spring 申请前转让由债务人通过其另我实体作出，其实际意图是阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人。\n\n99. 债务人在实施 Golden Spring 申请前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，可由包括下列情形在内的事实证明：\n\n案号 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 31 页，共 168 页\n\na. Golden Spring 申请前转让系利用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Golden Spring 申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Golden Spring 申请前转让系作为债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分实施，并在债务人为隐匿和保护资产而控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下进行；\n\nd. Golden Spring 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Golden Spring 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n100. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(1)、274 及 276 条和《破产法》第 544(b) 条，受托人可撤销 Golden Spring 申请前转让；根据《破产法》第 550(a) 条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第八项请求\n（向 Golden Spring 的转让）（根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条及第 550(a) 条，请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n101. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此完整载明。\n\n102. 债务人为 Golden Spring 申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n103. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或因 Golden Spring 申请前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n104. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n105. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n106. Golden Spring 申请前转让构成欺诈性转让；根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条，受托人可撤销该等转让；根据《破产法》第 550(a) 条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第九项请求\n（向 Golden Spring 的转让）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 及 276 条和《破产法》第 544(b) 条及第 550(a) 条，请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n107. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此完整载明。\n\n案号 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 33 页，共 168 页\n\n108. 债务人未就 Golden Spring 申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n109. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或债务人因 Golden Spring 申请前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n110. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n111. 在 Golden Spring 申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n112. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273(a)(2)、274 及 276 条和《破产法》第 544(b) 条，受托人可撤销 Golden Spring 申请前转让；根据《破产法》第 550(a) 条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第十项请求\n（向 Golden Spring 的转让）（根据《破产法》第 549 条及第 550(a) 条，请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让）\n\n113. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此完整载明。\n\n114. Golden Spring 申请后转让由债务人通过其另我空壳公司向 Golden Spring 作出。\n\n115. Golden Spring 申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n116. Golden Spring 申请后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n案号 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 34 页，共 168 页\n\n117. Golden Spring 申请后转让构成对债务人第 11 章财产未经授权的转让。\n\n118. 根据《破产法》第 549(a) 条，Golden Spring 申请后转让可予撤销。\n\n119. 根据《破产法》第 550(a) 条，受托人有权向 Golden Spring 追回 Golden Spring 申请后转让，或其价值，并加计至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第十一项请求\n（向 Greenwich Land（格林尼治地产）的转让）（根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条及第 550(a) 条，请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n120. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此完整载明。\n\n121. Greenwich Land 申请前转让由债务人通过其另我实体作出，其实际意图是阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人。\n\n122. 债务人在实施 Greenwich Land 申请前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，可由包括下列情形在内的事实证明：\n\na. Greenwich Land 申请前转让系利用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Greenwich Land 申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Greenwich Land 申请前转让系作为债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分实施，并在债务人为隐匿和保护资产而控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下进行；\n\n案号 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 35 页，共 168 页\n\nd. Greenwich Land 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Greenwich Land 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Greenwich Land 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Greenwich Land 申请前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n123. 根据《破产法》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条，受托人可撤销 Greenwich Land 申请前转让；根据《破产法》第 550(a) 条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第十二项请求\n（向 Greenwich Land 的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第 273、274 及 276 条，以及《破产法》第 544(b) 条及第 550(a) 条，请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n124. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此完整载明。\n\n125. Greenwich Land 申请前转让由债务人通过其另我实体作出，其实际意图是阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人。\n\n126. 债务人在实施 Greenwich Land 申请前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，可由包括下列情形在内的事实证明：\n\n案号 22-50073，文件 2925，于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 36 页，共 168 页\n\na. Greenwich Land 申请前转让系利用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Greenwich Land 申请前转让向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Greenwich Land 申请前转让系作为债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分实施，并在债务人为隐匿和保护资产而控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下进行；\n\nd. Greenwich Land 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Greenwich Land 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Greenwich Land 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Greenwich Land 申请前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n127. 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1)、274 和 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可撤销 Greenwich Land（格林尼治地产）申请破产前转让；并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第十三项请求\n（向 Greenwich Land 的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n128. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n129. 债务人就 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n130. 在 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让时，债务人已无清偿能力，或因该等转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n131. 在 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n132. 在 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n133. Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 予以撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第十四项请求\n（向 Greenwich Land 的转让）（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274 和 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n134. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 38 页，共 168 页\n\n135. 债务人就 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n136. 在 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让时，债务人已无清偿能力，或债务人因 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n137. 在 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n138. 在 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n139. 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274 和 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可撤销 Greenwich Land 申请破产前转让；并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第十五项请求\n（向 Greenwich Land 的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让）\n\n140. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n141. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向 Greenwich Land 作出了所列明的申请破产后转让。\n\n142. Greenwich Land 申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n143. Greenwich Land 申请破产后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 39 页，共 168 页\n\n144. Greenwich Land 申请破产后转让构成对债务人第 11 章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n145. 依据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a)，Greenwich Land 申请破产后转让可予撤销。\n\n依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向 Greenwich Land 追回 Greenwich Land 申请破产后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第十六项请求\n（向 HCHK Technologies（HCHK 科技）的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n146. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n147. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让。\n\n148. 债务人在实施 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其通过以下事项得以证明：\n\na. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让系利用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让是债务人在其家庭成员及其控制的其他副手和下属协助下实施的“空壳游戏”的一部分，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 40 页，共 168 页\n\nd. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获益而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获利而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX Case（PAX 案件）中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人已无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n149. 受托人可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A) 撤销 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第十七项请求\n（向 HCHK Technologies 的转让）（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273、274 和 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n150. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n151. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让。\n\n152. 债务人在实施 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其通过以下事项得以证明：\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 41 页，共 168 页\n\na. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让系利用一家另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让是债务人在其家庭成员及其控制的其他副手和下属协助下实施的“空壳游戏”的一部分，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获益而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获利而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人已无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n153. 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1)、274 和 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可撤销 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让；并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第十八项请求\n（向 HCHK Technologies 的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n154. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n155. 债务人就 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n156. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人已无清偿能力，或因 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n157. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n158. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n159. HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 予以撤销，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第十九项请求\n（向 HCHK Technologies 的转让）（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274 和 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n160. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 43 页，共 168 页\n\n161. 债务人就 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n162. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人已无清偿能力，或债务人因 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让而变得无清偿能力。\n\n163. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产均构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n164. 在 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n165. 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2)、274 和 276，以及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可撤销 HCHK Technologies 申请破产前转让；并可依据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第二十项请求\n（向 HCHK Technologies 的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 和 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让）\n\n166. 受托人重申并再次主张第 1 至 65 段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n167. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向 HCHK Technologies 作出了 HCHK Technologies 申请破产后转让。\n\n168. HCHK Technologies 申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 44 页，共 168 页\n\n169. HCHK Technologies 申请破产后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n170. HCHK Technologies 申请破产后转让构成对债务人第 11 章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n171. 依据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a)，HCHK Technologies 申请破产后转让可予撤销。\n\n172. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向HCHK Technologies（HCHK科技）追回HCHK Technologies申请日后转让，或其等值款项，并加计截至付款之日的利息及本案诉讼费用。\n\n第二十一项请求\n（向HCHK Property（HCHK房地产）的转让）（根据《破产法》第549条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请日后转让）\n\n173. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n174. 债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司，向HCHK Property作出了HCHK Property申请日后转让。\n\n175. HCHK Property申请日后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n176. HCHK Property申请日后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n177. HCHK Property申请日后转让构成未经授权转让债务人第11章破产财产的行为。\n\n178. 根据《破产法》第549(a)条，HCHK Property申请日后转让可予撤销。\n\n179. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向HCHK Property追回HCHK Property申请日后转让，或其等值款项，并加计截至付款之日的利息及本案诉讼费用。\n\n第二十二项请求\n（向Lexington（列克星敦）的转让）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n180. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n181. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，作出了Lexington申请日前转让。\n\n182. 债务人在实施Lexington申请日前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由下列事实证明：\n\na. Lexington申请日前转让系通过一家作为另我的空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Lexington申请日前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Lexington申请日前转让是债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下所进行的“空壳游戏”的一部分；\n\nd. Lexington申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产处于其债权人可追及的范围，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 46 of 168\n\ne. Lexington申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产处于其债权人可追及的范围，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括PAX（PAX）在PAX案中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n183. 根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，受托人可撤销Lexington申请日前转让；根据《破产法》第550(a)条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第二十三项请求\n（向Lexington的转让）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n184. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n185. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，作出了Lexington申请日前转让。\n\n186. 债务人在实施Lexington申请日前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由下列事实证明：\n\na. Lexington申请日前转让系通过一家作为另我的空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Lexington申请日前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 47 of 168\n\nc. Lexington申请日前转让是债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下所进行的“空壳游戏”的一部分；\n\nd. Lexington申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产处于其债权人可追及的范围，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Lexington申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产处于其债权人可追及的范围，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括PAX在PAX案中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n187. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code，受托人可撤销Lexington申请日前转让；根据《破产法》第550(a)条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第二十四项请求\n（向Lexington的转让）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n188. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n189. 债务人就Lexington申请日前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 48 of 168\n\n190. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或因Lexington申请日前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n191. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地微薄的资本。\n\n192. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n193. Lexington申请日前转让构成欺诈性转让；根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条，受托人可予撤销该等转让；根据《破产法》第550(a)条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第二十五项请求\n（向Lexington的转让）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n194. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n195. 债务人未就Lexington申请日前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n196. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或债务人因Lexington申请日前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n197. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地微薄的资本。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 49 of 168\n\n198. 在Lexington申请日前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或理应相信其将承担，到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n199. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code，受托人可撤销Lexington申请日前转让；根据《破产法》第550(a)条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第二十六项请求\n（向Lexington的转让）（根据《破产法》第549条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请日后转让）\n\n200. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n201. 债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司，向Lexington作出了Lexington申请日后转让。\n\n202. Lexington申请日后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n203. Lexington申请日后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n204. Lexington申请日后转让构成未经授权转让债务人第11章破产财产的行为。\n\n205. 根据《破产法》第549(a)条，Lexington申请日后转让可予撤销。\n\n206. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Lexington追回Lexington申请日后转让，或其等值款项，并加计截至付款之日的利息及本案诉讼费用。\n\n第二十七项请求\n（向Hudson Diamond（哈德逊钻石）的转让）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n207. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n208. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，作出了Hudson Diamond申请日前转让。\n\n209. 债务人在实施Hudson Diamond申请日前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由下列事实证明：\n\na. Hudson Diamond申请日前转让系通过一家作为另我的空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Hudson Diamond申请日前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Hudson Diamond申请日前转让是债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下所进行的“空壳游戏”的一部分；\n\nd. Hudson Diamond申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产处于其债权人可追及的范围，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hudson Diamond申请日前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产处于其债权人可追及的范围，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 51 of 168\n\nf. 在Hudson Diamond申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括PAX在PAX案中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Hudson Diamond申请日前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n210. 根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，受托人可撤销Hudson Diamond申请日前转让；根据《破产法》第550(a)条，该等转让可予追回。\n\n第二十八项请求\n（向Hudson Diamond的转让）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n211. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此全文列明。\n\n212. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，作出了Hudson Diamond申请日前转让。\n\n213. 债务人在实施Hudson Diamond申请日前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由下列事实证明：\n\na. Hudson Diamond申请日前转让系通过一家作为另我的空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Hudson Diamond申请日前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Hudson Diamond（哈德逊钻石）破产申请前转让是在债务人家属及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下，作为债务人的“障眼法”的一部分实施的，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 52 页，共 168 页\n\nd. Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中牟利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX（PAX）在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n214. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追偿。\n\n第二十九项请求权\n\n（向Hudson Diamond的转让）（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)撤销及追偿推定欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n215. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n216. 债务人就Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让所取得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n217. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 53 页，共 168 页\n\n218. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所保留的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n219. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或相信其将产生，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n220. Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追偿。\n\n第三十项请求权\n\n（向Hudson Diamond的转让）\n\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销及追偿推定欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n221. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n222. 债务人就Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让未取得合理等值对价。\n\n223. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n224. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所保留的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 54 页，共 168 页\n\n225. 在Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或相信或合理地应当相信其将产生，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n226. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追偿。\n\n第三十一项请求权\n\n（向Leading Shine（领晖）的转让）（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)撤销及追偿实际欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n227. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n228. Leading Shine破产申请前转让由债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n229. 债务人在实施Leading Shine破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，体现在：\n\na. Leading Shine破产申请前转让是利用一家替身空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. Leading Shine破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Leading Shine破产申请前转让是在债务人家属及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下，作为债务人的“障眼法”的一部分实施的，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 55 页，共 168 页\n\nd. Leading Shine破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Leading Shine破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中牟利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n230. 根据Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，受托人可以撤销Leading Shine破产申请前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追偿。\n\n第三十二项请求权\n\n（向Leading Shine的转让）（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销及追偿实际欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n231. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n232. Leading Shine破产申请前转让由债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n233. 债务人在实施Leading Shine破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，体现在：\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 56 页，共 168 页\n\na. Leading Shine破产申请前转让是利用一家替身空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. Leading Shine破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Leading Shine破产申请前转让是在债务人家属及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下，作为债务人的“障眼法”的一部分实施的，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Leading Shine破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Leading Shine破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中牟利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n234. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销Leading Shine破产申请前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追偿。\n\n第三十三项请求权\n\n（向Leading Shine的转让）（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)撤销及追偿推定欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n235. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n236. 债务人就Hudson Diamond破产申请前转让所取得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n237. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因Leading Shine破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n238. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所保留的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n239. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或相信其将产生，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n240. Leading Shine破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追偿。\n\n第三十四项请求权\n\n（向Leading Shine的转让）\n\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a)撤销及追偿推定欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n241. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 58 页，共 168 页\n\n242. 债务人就Leading Shine破产申请前转让未取得合理等值对价。\n\n243. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因Leading Shine破产申请前转让而变为资不抵债。\n\n244. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所保留的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n245. 在Leading Shine破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或相信或合理地应当相信其将产生，在该等债务到期时超出其偿还能力的债务。\n\n246. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及Bankruptcy Code section 544(b)，受托人可以撤销Leading Shine破产申请前转让，并可根据Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)予以追偿。\n\n第三十五项请求权\n\n（向G Club International（G Club International）的转让）（根据Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)撤销及追偿实际欺诈性转让的请求权）\n\n247. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n248. G Club International破产申请前转让由债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n249. 债务人在实施G Club International破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，体现在：\n\n案号 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 59 页，共 168 页\n\na. G Club International破产申请前转让是利用一家替身空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. G Club International破产申请前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. G Club International破产申请前转让是在债务人家属及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下，作为债务人的“障眼法”的一部分实施的，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. G Club International（G Club International）申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. G Club International申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX（PAX）在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人处于无力偿债或资本不足的状态。\n\n250. 根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，受托人可以撤销G Club International申请破产前转让；并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第三十六项诉请\n（向G Club International的转让）（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276，以及《破产法》第544(b)和550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的诉请）\n\n251. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此完整列明。\n\n252. 债务人通过其替身实体，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了G Club International申请破产前转让。\n\n253. 债务人在实施G Club International申请破产前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的事实，除其他事项外，表明如下：\n\na. G Club International申请破产前转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. G Club International申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. G Club International申请破产前转让系债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下，作为其“空壳把戏”的一部分而实施；\n\nd. G Club International申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. G Club International申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 61 页，共 168 页\n\nf. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人处于无力偿债或资本不足的状态。\n\n254. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及《破产法》第544(b)条，受托人可以撤销G Club International申请破产前转让；并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第三十七项诉请\n（向G Club International的转让）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)和550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的诉请）\n\n255. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此完整列明。\n\n256. 债务人为换取G Club International申请破产前转让所获得的价值低于合理等值。\n\n257. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人已无力偿债，或者因G Club International申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n258. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n259. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担，或者相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 62 页，共 168 页\n\n260. G Club International申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让；根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条，受托人可以撤销该等转让，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第三十八项诉请\n（向G Club International的转让）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法》第544(b)和550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的诉请）\n\n261. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此完整列明。\n\n262. 债务人为换取G Club International申请破产前转让未获得合理等值。\n\n263. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人已无力偿债，或者因G Club International申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n264. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n265. 在进行G Club International申请破产前转让时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或合理地应当相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n266. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法》第544(b)条，受托人可以撤销G Club International申请破产前转让；并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第三十九项诉请\n（向G Club International的转让）（根据《破产法》第549和550(a)条撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让的诉请）\n\n267. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此完整列明。\n\n268. 债务人通过其替身空壳公司向G Club International作出了G Club International申请破产后转让。\n\n269. G Club International申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n270. G Club International申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n271. G Club International申请破产后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n272. 根据《破产法》第549(a)条，G Club International申请破产后转让可以被撤销。\n\n273. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向G Club International追回G Club International申请破产后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款日的利息以及本案费用。\n\n第四十项诉请\n（向G Club Operations（G Club Operations）的转让）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)和550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的诉请）\n\n274. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此完整列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 64 页，共 168 页\n\n275. 债务人通过其替身实体，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了G Club Operations申请破产前转让。\n\n276. 债务人在实施G Club Operations申请破产前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的事实，除其他事项外，表明如下：\n\na. G Club Operations转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. G Club Operations转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. G Club Operations转让系债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下，作为其“空壳把戏”的一部分而实施；\n\nd. G Club Operations申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. G Club Operations申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在进行G Club Operations申请破产前转让时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在进行G Club Operations申请破产前转让时，债务人处于无力偿债或资本不足的状态。\n\n277. 根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，受托人可以撤销G Club Operations转让；并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第四十一项诉请\n（向G Club Operations的转让）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276，以及《破产法》第544(b)和550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的诉请）\n\n278. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此完整列明。\n\n279. 债务人通过其替身实体，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了G Club Operations申请破产前转让。\n\n280. 债务人在实施G Club Operations申请破产前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的事实，除其他事项外，表明如下：\n\na. G Club Operations申请破产前转让系使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. G Club Operations申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. G Club Operations申请破产前转让系债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下，作为其“空壳把戏”的一部分而实施；\n\nd. G Club Operations申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 66 页，共 168 页\n\ne. G Club Operations申请破产前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受到债权人追索，从而促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在进行G Club Operations申请破产前转让时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在进行G Club Operations申请破产前转让时，债务人处于无力偿债或资本不足的状态。\n\n281. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及《破产法》第544(b)条，受托人可以撤销G Club Operations申请破产前转让；并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第四十二项诉请\n（向G Club Operations的转让）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)和550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的诉请）\n\n282. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此完整列明。\n\n283. 债务人为换取G Club Operations申请破产前转让所获得的价值低于合理等值。\n\n284. 在进行G Club Operations申请破产前转让时，债务人已无力偿债，或者因G Club Operations申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n285. 在进行G Club Operations申请破产前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 67 页，共 168 页\n\n286. 在向 G Club Operations（G Club 运营）作出申请前转让时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n287. G Club Operations 申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第四十三项请求\n（向 G Club Operations 的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n288. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n289. 债务人并未就 G Club Operations 申请前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n290. 在作出 G Club Operations 申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或者债务人因 G Club Operations 申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n291. 在作出 G Club Operations 申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而就该等业务或交易而言，债务人保留的任何财产构成不合理地少的资本。\n\n292. 在作出 G Club Operations 申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 68 页，共 168 页\n\n293. G Club Operations 申请前转让可由受托人根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第四十四项请求\n（向 G Club Operations 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让的请求）\n\n294. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n295. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向 G Club Operations 作出了 G Club Operations 申请后转让。\n\n296. G Club Operations 申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n297. G Club Operations 申请后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n298. G Club Operations 申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n299. G Club Operations 申请后转让可根据《破产法》第549(a)条予以撤销。\n\n300. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向 G Club Operations 追回 G Club Operations 申请后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第四十五项请求\n（向 G Fashion（G 时尚）的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n301. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n302. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 G Fashion 申请前转让。\n\n303. 债务人在实施 G Fashion 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. G Fashion 申请前转让系通过一个另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. G Fashion 申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. G Fashion 申请前转让是在债务人家属及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下，作为债务人为隐瞒和保护资产而进行的“空壳游戏”的一部分实施；\n\nd. G Fashion 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. G Fashion 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 70 页，共 168 页\n\nf. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；及\n\ng. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n304. G Fashion 转让可由受托人根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第四十六项请求\n\n（向 G Fashion 的转让）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n305. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n306. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 G Fashion 申请前转让。\n\n307. 债务人在实施 G Fashion 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. G Fashion 申请前转让系通过一个另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. G Fashion 申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. G Fashion 申请前转让是在债务人家属及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下，作为债务人为隐瞒和保护资产而进行的“空壳游戏”的一部分实施；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 71 页，共 168 页\n\nd. G Fashion 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. G Fashion 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；及\n\ng. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n308. G Fashion 申请前转让可由受托人根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第四十七项请求\n（向 G Fashion 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n309. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n310. 债务人就 G Fashion 申请前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n311. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或者债务人因 G Fashion 申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 72 页，共 168 页\n\n312. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而就该等业务或交易而言，债务人保留的任何财产构成不合理地少的资本。\n\n313. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n314. G Fashion 申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第四十八项请求\n（向 G Fashion 的转让）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n315. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n316. 债务人并未就 G Fashion 申请前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n317. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或者债务人因 G Fashion 申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n318. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而就该等业务或交易而言，债务人保留的任何财产构成不合理地少的资本。\n\n319. 在作出 G Fashion 申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n320. G Fashion 申请前转让可由受托人根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第四十九项请求\n（向 G Media（G 媒体）的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n321. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n322. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 G Media 申请前转让。\n\n323. 债务人在实施 G Media 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. G Media 申请前转让系通过一个另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. G Media 申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. G Media 申请前转让是在债务人家属及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下，作为债务人为隐瞒和保护资产而进行的“空壳游戏”的一部分实施；\n\nd. G Media 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 74 页，共 168 页\n\ne. G Media 申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利而不使其财产受到债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在作出 G Media 申请前转让时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；及\n\ng. 在作出 G Media 申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n324. G Media 转让可由受托人根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十项请求\n（向 G Media 的转让）\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n325. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至42段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n326. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 G Media 申请前转让。\n\n327. 债务人在实施G Media（G媒体）申请破产前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，这一点可由包括以下在内的事实表明：\n\na. G Media申请破产前转让是通过一家作为另一个自我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. G Media申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 75 页，共 168 页\n\nc. G Media申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在债务人控制的家庭成员以及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. G Media申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获益，进一步推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. G Media申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX（PAX）在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n328. G Media申请破产前转让可由受托人依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及《破产法典》第544(b)条予以撤销，并可依据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十一项诉讼请求\n（向G Media的转让）（依据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n329. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同其已在本文中完整列明。\n\n330. 债务人就G Media申请破产前转让所获对价少于合理等值对价。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 76 页，共 168 页\n\n331. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或因G Media申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n332. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产所对应的资本数额均不合理地过少。\n\n333. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担或认为其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n334. G Media申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人依据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销，并可依据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十二项诉讼请求\n（向G Media的转让）\n（依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及《破产法典》第544(b)条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n335. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同其已在本文中完整列明。\n\n336. 债务人就G Media申请破产前转让未获合理等值对价。\n\n337. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或债务人因G Media申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n338. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产所对应的资本数额均不合理地过少。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 77 页，共 168 页\n\n339. 在G Media申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或认为或合理地应当认为其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n340. G Media申请破产前转让可由受托人依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法典》第544(b)条予以撤销，并可依据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十三项诉讼请求\n（向Rule of Law（法治）的转让）（依据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n341. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同其已在本文中完整列明。\n\n342. Rule of Law申请破产前转让由债务人通过其作为另一个我的实体作出，且具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n343. 债务人在实施Rule of Law申请破产前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，这一点可由包括以下在内的事实表明：\n\na. Rule of Law申请破产前转让是通过一家作为另一个自我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. Rule of Law申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Rule of Law申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在债务人控制的家庭成员以及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 78 页，共 168 页\n\nd. Rule of Law申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获益，进一步推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Rule of Law申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n344. Rule of Law转让可由受托人依据《破产法典》第548(a)(i)(A)条予以撤销，并可依据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十四项诉讼请求\n（向Rule of Law的转让）（依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276及《破产法典》第544(b)条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n345. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同其已在本文中完整列明。\n\n346. Rule of Law申请破产前转让由债务人通过其作为另一个我的实体作出，且具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n347. 债务人在实施Rule of Law申请破产前转让时意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，这一点可由包括以下在内的事实表明：\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 79 页，共 168 页\n\na. Rule of Law申请破产前转让是通过一家作为另一个自我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. Rule of Law申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Rule of Law申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在债务人控制的家庭成员以及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Rule of Law申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获益，进一步推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Rule of Law申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正受到诉讼，包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n348. Rule of Law申请破产前转让可由受托人依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及《破产法典》第544(b)条予以撤销，并可依据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十五项诉讼请求\n（向Rule of Law的转让）（依据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n349. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同其已在本文中完整列明。\n\n350. 债务人就Rule of Law申请破产前转让所获对价少于合理等值对价。\n\n351. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或因Rule of Law申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n352. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产所对应的资本数额均不合理地过少。\n\n353. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担或认为其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n354. Rule of Law申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人依据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销，并可依据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十六项诉讼请求\n（向Rule of Law的转让）\n（依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276及《破产法典》第544(b)条和第550(a)条请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n355. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同其已在本文中完整列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 81 页，共 168 页\n\n356. 债务人就Rule of Law申请破产前转让未获合理等值对价。\n\n357. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或债务人因Rule of Law申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n358. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产所对应的资本数额均不合理地过少。\n\n359. 在Rule of Law申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或认为或合理地应当认为其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n360. Rule of Law申请破产前转让可由受托人依据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法典》第544(b)条予以撤销，并可依据《破产法典》第550(a)条予以追回。\n\n第五十七项诉讼请求\n（向Rule of Law的转让）（依据《破产法典》第549条及第550(a)条请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让）\n\n361. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同其已在本文中完整列明。\n\n362. Rule of Law申请破产后转让由债务人通过其作为另一个我的空壳公司向Rule of Law作出。\n\n363. Rule of Law申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n364. Rule of Law申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 于 02/15/24 提交，于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记，第 82 页，共 168 页\n\n365. Rule of Law申请破产后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产未经授权的转让。\n\n366. Rule of Law申请破产后转让可依据《破产法典》第549(a)条予以撤销。\n\n367. 根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，受托人有权向 Rule of Law（法治）追回法治破产申请日后转让，或其价值，并加计至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第五十八项请求\n（向 Rule of Law Society（法治协会）的转让）（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n368. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n369. 法治协会破产申请日前转让系债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n370. 债务人为实施法治协会破产申请日前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实表明：\n\na. 法治协会破产申请日前转让系通过使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 法治协会破产申请日前转让被对债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 法治协会破产申请日前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 83 of 168\n\nd. 法治协会破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 法治协会破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n371. 根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条，法治协会转让可由受托人撤销；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以追回。\n\n第五十九项请求\n（向法治协会的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273、274及276条，以及《破产法典》第544(b)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n372. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n373. 法治协会破产申请日前转让系债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n374. 债务人为实施法治协会破产申请日前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实表明：\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 84 of 168\n\na. 法治协会破产申请日前转让系通过使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. 法治协会破产申请日前转让被对债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. 法治协会破产申请日前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. 法治协会破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. 法治协会破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n375. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(1)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条，法治协会破产申请日前转让可由受托人撤销；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以追回。\n\n第六十项请求\n（向法治协会的转让）（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n376. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n377. 债务人就法治协会破产申请日前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n378. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人资不抵债，或因法治协会破产申请日前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n379. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n380. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或相信其将产生在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n381. 法治协会破产申请日前转让构成欺诈性转让，根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条可由受托人撤销，并根据《破产法典》第550(a)条可以追回。\n\n第六十一项请求\n（向法治协会的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(2)、274和276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n382. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 86 of 168\n\n383. 债务人就法治协会破产申请日前转让未获得合理等值的对价。\n\n384. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人资不抵债，或债务人因法治协会破产申请日前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n385. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人剩余的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n386. 在法治协会破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人意图产生，或相信或合理地应当相信其将产生在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n387. 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(2)、274和276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条，法治协会破产申请日前转让可由受托人撤销；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以追回。\n\n第六十二项请求\n（向法治协会的转让）（根据《破产法典》第549条和第550(a)条撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请日后转让的请求）\n\n388. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n389. 法治协会破产申请日后转让由债务人通过其替身空壳公司向法治协会作出。\n\n390. 法治协会破产申请日后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 87 of 168\n\n391. 法治协会破产申请日后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n392. 法治协会破产申请日后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产未经授权的转让。\n\n393. 根据《破产法典》第549(a)条，法治协会破产申请日后转让可被撤销。\n\n394. 根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，受托人有权向法治协会追回法治协会破产申请日后转让，或其价值，并加计至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第六十三项请求\n（向 GFNY 的转让）（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n395. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n396. GFNY 破产申请日前转让系债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n397. 债务人为实施 GFNY 破产申请日前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实表明：\n\na. GFNY 破产申请日前转让系通过使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. GFNY 破产申请日前转让被对债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 88 of 168\n\nc. GFNY 破产申请日前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. GFNY 破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. GFNY 破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 GFNY 破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 GFNY 破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n398. 根据《破产法典》第548(a)(i)(A)条，GFNY 转让可由受托人撤销；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以追回。\n\n第六十四项请求\n\n（向 GFNY 的转让）\n\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273、274及276条，以及《破产法典》第544(b)条和第550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让的请求）\n\n399. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在此全文列明。\n\n400. GFNY 破产申请日前转让系债务人通过其替身实体作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 89 of 168\n\n401. 债务人为实施 GFNY 破产申请日前转让而具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，可由包括以下事项在内的事实表明：\n\na. GFNY 破产申请日前转让系通过使用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. GFNY 破产申请日前转让被对债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. GFNY 破产申请日前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，旨在隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. GFNY 破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. GFNY 破产申请日前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产处于债权人可追索范围内，进一步促进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 GFNY 破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 GFNY 破产申请日前转让发生时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n402. GFNY 申请破产前转让可由受托人根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第六十五项请求\n（向 GFNY 的转让）（根据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n403. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n404. 债务人就 GFNY 申请破产前转让所获对价低于合理等值。\n\n405. 在 GFNY 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已无力偿债，或因 GFNY 申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n406. 在 GFNY 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成数额不合理地过少的资本。\n\n407. 在 GFNY 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n408. GFNY 申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人根据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第六十六项请求\n（向 GFNY 的转让）\n（根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n409. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 91 页，共 168 页\n\n410. 债务人就 GFNY 申请破产前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n411. 在 GFNY 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已无力偿债，或债务人因 Rule of Law 申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n412. 在 GFNY 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成数额不合理地过少的资本。\n\n413. 在 GFNY 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n414. GFNY 申请破产前转让可由受托人根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第六十七项请求\n（向 GFNY 的转让）（根据《破产法》sections 549 and 550(a)请求撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让）\n\n415. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n416. 债务人通过其替身空壳公司向 GFNY 作出了 GFNY 破产申请后转让。\n\n417. GFNY 破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n418. GFNY 破产申请后转让未经破产法院或《破产法》授权。\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 92 页，共 168 页\n\n419. GFNY 破产申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n420. GFNY 破产申请后转让可根据《破产法》section 549(a)予以撤销。\n\n421. 根据《破产法》section 550(a)，受托人有权向 GFNY 追回 GFNY 破产申请后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第六十八项请求\n（向 Anton Development（安东开发）的转让）（根据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n422. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n423. 债务人通过其替身，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 Anton Development 申请破产前转让。\n\n424. 债务人在实施 Anton Development 申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Anton Development 申请破产前转让系利用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Anton Development 申请破产前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Anton Development 申请破产前转让构成债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属协助下实施该等转让；\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 93 页，共 168 页\n\nd. Anton Development 申请破产前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中受益，同时不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Anton Development 申请破产前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获利，同时不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正面临诉讼，包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n425. Anton Development 转让可由受托人根据《破产法》section 548(a)(i)(A)予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第六十九项请求\n（向 Anton Development（安东开发）的转让）（根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》sections 273, 274, and 276以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n426. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n427. 债务人通过其替身，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 Anton Development 申请破产前转让。\n\n428. 债务人在实施 Anton Development 申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 94 页，共 168 页\n\na. Anton Development 申请破产前转让系利用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Anton Development 申请破产前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Anton Development 申请破产前转让构成债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属协助下实施该等转让；\n\nd. Anton Development 申请破产前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中受益，同时不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Anton Development 申请破产前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获利，同时不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步促成债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正面临诉讼，包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n429. Anton Development 申请破产前转让可由受托人根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第七十项请求\n（向 Anton Development（安东开发）的转让）（根据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n430. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n431. 债务人就 Anton Development 申请破产前转让所获对价低于合理等值。\n\n432. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已无力偿债，或因 Anton Development 申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n433. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成数额不合理地过少的资本。\n\n434. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n435. Anton Development 申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由受托人根据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第七十一项请求\n（向 Anton Development（安东开发）的转让）（根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法》sections 544(b) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n436. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 96 页，共 168 页\n\n437. 债务人就 Anton Development 申请破产前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n438. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人已无力偿债，或债务人因 Anton Development 申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n439. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成数额不合理地过少的资本。\n\n440. 在 Anton Development 申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n441. Anton Development 申请破产前转让可由受托人根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276以及《破产法》section 544(b)予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》section 550(a)予以追回。\n\n第七十二项请求\n（向 Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）的转让）（根据《破产法》sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a)请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n442. 受托人重申并重新主张第1至65段所载指控，视同在此全文列明。\n\n443. 债务人通过其替身，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的方式作出了 Himalaya Intl. 申请破产前转让。\n\n444. 债务人在实施 Himalaya Intl. 申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 97 页，共 168 页\n\na. Himalaya Intl. 申请破产前转让系利用替身空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Himalaya Intl. 申请破产前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya Intl. 申请破产前转让构成债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，债务人为隐匿和保护资产，在其控制的家庭成员及其他亲信和下属协助下实施该等转让；\n\nd. Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中受益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括PAX（帕克斯）在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n445. 根据《破产法典》第548(a)(i)(A)条，受托人可以撤销Himalaya Intl.转让；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以被追回。\n\n第七十三项请求\n（向Himalaya Intl.的转让）（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)及550(a)条，请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n446. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此完整列明。\n\n447. 债务人通过其另我实体作出Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让时，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n448. 债务人在实施Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让是利用一家作为另我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家庭成员及其控制的其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中受益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\n案件 22-50073 文档 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 99 页，共 168 页\n\nf. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n449. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(1)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条，受托人可以撤销Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以被追回。\n\n第七十四项请求\n（向Himalaya Intl.的转让）（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)及550(a)条，请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n450. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此完整列明。\n\n451. 债务人就Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n452. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或因Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n453. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所保留的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n454. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n案件 22-50073 文档 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 100 页，共 168 页\n\n455. Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让构成欺诈性转让，根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条，受托人可以撤销该等转让；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以被追回。\n\n第七十五项请求\n（向Himalaya Intl.的转让）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(2)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)及550(a)条，请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n456. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此完整列明。\n\n457. 债务人未就Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n458. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或债务人因Rule of Law（法治）申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n459. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所保留的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n460. 在Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n461. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(2)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条，受托人可以撤销Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以被追回。\n\n第七十六项请求\n（向Himalaya Intl.的转让）（根据《破产法典》第549及550(a)条，请求撤销并追回未经授权的申请破产后转让）\n\n462. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此完整列明。\n\n463. 债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司向Himalaya Intl.作出了Himalaya Intl.申请破产后转让。\n\n464. Himalaya Intl.申请破产后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n465. Himalaya Intl.申请破产后转让未经破产法院或《破产法典》授权。\n\n466. Himalaya Intl.申请破产后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产未经授权的转让。\n\n467. 根据《破产法典》第549(a)条，Himalaya Intl.申请破产后转让可以被撤销。\n\n468. 根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya Intl.追回Himalaya Intl.申请破产后转让，或其价值，加上截至付款之日的利息及本案诉讼费用。\n\n第七十七项请求\n（向China Golden（中国金色）的转让）（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)及550(a)条，请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n469. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此完整列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文档 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 102 页，共 168 页\n\n470. 债务人通过其另我实体作出China Golden申请破产前转让时，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n471. 债务人在实施China Golden申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. China Golden申请破产前转让是利用一家作为另我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. China Golden申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. China Golden申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家庭成员及其控制的其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. China Golden申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中受益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. China Golden申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在China Golden申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在China Golden申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n472. 根据《破产法典》第548(a)(i)(A)条，受托人可以撤销China Golden转让；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以被追回。\n\n第七十八项请求\n（向China Golden的转让）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)及550(a)条，请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n473. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此完整列明。\n\n474. 债务人通过其另我实体作出China Golden申请破产前转让时，具有阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n475. 债务人在实施China Golden申请破产前转让时阻碍、拖延及/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. China Golden申请破产前转让是利用一家作为另我的空壳公司实施的；\n\nb. China Golden申请破产前转让被向债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. China Golden申请破产前转让是债务人“空壳把戏”的一部分，并在债务人的家庭成员及其控制的其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. China Golden申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中受益，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\n案件 22-50073 文档 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 104 页，共 168 页\n\ne. China Golden申请破产前转让通过使债务人在不使其财产受到其债权人追索的情况下从其欺诈行为中获利，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在China Golden申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，其中包括PAX在PAX案中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在China Golden申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n476. 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(1)、274及276条以及《破产法典》第544(b)条，受托人可以撤销China Golden申请破产前转让；根据《破产法典》第550(a)条，该等转让可以被追回。\n\n第七十九项请求\n（向China Golden的转让）（根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)及550(a)条，请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n477. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此完整列明。\n\n478. 债务人就China Golden申请破产前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n479. 在China Golden申请破产前转让发生时，债务人无力偿债，或因Himalaya Intl.申请破产前转让而变得无力偿债。\n\n480. 在China Golden申请破产前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人所保留的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n案件 22-50073 文档 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 105 页，共 168 页\n\n481. 在China Golden申请破产前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，到期时将超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n482. China Golden（中国金）申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据 Bankruptcy Code（《破产法》）section 548(a)(1)(B) 撤销该等转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第八十项请求\n\n（向 China Golden 的转让。）\n\n（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 及 Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n483. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n484. 债务人未就 China Golden 申请前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n485. 在 China Golden 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力，或债务人因 Rule of Law（法治）申请前转让而变为无清偿能力。\n\n486. 在 China Golden 申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保有的任何财产构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n487. 在 China Golden 申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n488. 受托人可根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 及 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 撤销 China Golden 申请前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第八十一项请求\n\n（向 GF Italy（意大利GF）的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让之请求）\n\n489. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n490. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向 Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）作出了 GF Italy 申请后转让。\n\n491. GF Italy 申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n492. GF Italy 申请后转让未经 Bankruptcy Court（破产法院）或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n493. GF Italy 申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n494. GF Italy 申请后转让可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a) 撤销。\n\n495. 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向 GF Italy 追回 GF Italy 申请后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款日的利息及本案诉讼费用。\n\n第八十二项请求\n\n（向 ACA 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n496. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 107 页，共 168 页\n\n497. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，作出了 ACA 申请前转让。\n\n498. 债务人在实施 ACA 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. ACA 申请前转让系利用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. ACA 申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. ACA 申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在债务人家庭成员及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，以图隐匿及保护资产；\n\nd. ACA 申请前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. ACA 申请前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中牟利，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX Case（PAX案件）中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n499. 受托人可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(i)(A) 撤销 ACA 转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第八十三项请求\n\n（向 ACA 的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n500. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n501. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，作出了 ACA 申请前转让。\n\n502. 债务人在实施 ACA 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. ACA 申请前转让系利用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. ACA 申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. ACA 申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在债务人家庭成员及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，以图隐匿及保护资产；\n\nd. ACA 申请前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. ACA 申请前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中牟利，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX Case 中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 109 页，共 168 页\n\ng. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n503. 受托人可根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 撤销 ACA 申请前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第八十四项请求\n\n（向 ACA 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n504. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n505. 债务人就 ACA 申请前转让获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n506. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力，或因 ACA 申请前转让而变为无清偿能力。\n\n507. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保有的任何财产构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n508. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n509. ACA 申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B) 撤销该等转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第八十五项请求\n\n（向 ACA 的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n510. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n511. 债务人未就 ACA 申请前转让获得合理等值的对价。\n\n512. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力，或债务人因 Rule of Law 申请前转让而变为无清偿能力。\n\n513. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人保有的任何财产构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n514. 在 ACA 申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n515. 受托人可根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 撤销 ACA 申请前转让，并可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a) 予以追回。\n\n第八十六项请求\n\n（向 ACA 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回未经授权的申请后转让之请求）\n\n516. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 111 页，共 168 页\n\n517. 债务人通过其另我空壳公司向 ACA 作出了 ACA 申请后转让。\n\n518. ACA 申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n519. ACA 申请后转让未经 Bankruptcy Court 或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n520. ACA 申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n521. ACA 申请后转让可根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549(a) 撤销。\n\n根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)，受托人有权向 ACA 追回 ACA 申请后转让，或其价值，加计截至付款日的利息及本案诉讼费用。\n\n第八十七项请求\n\n（向 Hamilton（汉密尔顿）的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 提出的撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n522. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载的指称，如同在此全文列明。\n\n523. 债务人通过其另我，以实际意图阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人，作出了 Hamilton 申请前转让。\n\n524. 债务人在实施 Hamilton 申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Hamilton 申请前转让系利用另我空壳公司实施；\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 于 02/15/24 提交 于 02/15/24 22:02:58 登记 第 112 页，共 168 页\n\nb. Hamilton 申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Hamilton 申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在债务人家庭成员及其控制的其他亲信和下属的协助下实施，以图隐匿及保护资产；\n\nd. Hamilton 申请前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hamilton 申请前转让通过使债务人得以从其欺诈行为中牟利，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Hamilton 申请前转让发生时，债务人正被提起诉讼，包括 PAX 在 PAX Case 中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Hamilton 申请前转让发生时，债务人无清偿能力或资本不足。\n\n525. 受托人可依据 Bankruptcy Code（《破产法》）第548(a)(i)(A)条撤销 Hamilton（汉密尔顿）转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第八十八项请求\n（向 Hamilton 的转让）（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273、274及276条以及 Bankruptcy Code 第544(b)及550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n526. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 113 页，共 168 页\n\n527. 债务人通过其另一自我实体作出 Hamilton 破产申请前转让，具有阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n528. 债务人在实施 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Hamilton 破产申请前转让系利用另一自我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Hamilton 破产申请前转让被对债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Hamilton 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Hamilton 破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，同时不使其财产受其债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hamilton 破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，同时不使其财产受其债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 114 页，共 168 页\n\n529. 受托人可依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(1)、274及276条以及 Bankruptcy Code 第544(b)条撤销 Hamilton 破产申请前转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第八十九项请求\n（向 Hamilton 的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code 第548(a)(1)(B)及550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n530. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n531. 债务人就 Hamilton 破产申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n532. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或因 Hamilton 破产申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n533. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n534. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其支付能力的债务。\n\n535. Hamilton 破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第548(a)(1)(B)条撤销该等转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第九十项请求\n（向 Hamilton 的转让）（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(2)、274及276条以及 Bankruptcy Code 第544(b)及550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n536. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n537. 债务人未就 Hamilton 破产申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n538. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n539. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n540. 在 Hamilton 破产申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信或合理地应当相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其支付能力的债务。\n\n541. 受托人可依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(2)、274及276条以及 Bankruptcy Code 第544(b)条撤销 Hamilton 破产申请前转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第九十一项请求\n（向 Hamilton 的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code 第549及550(a)条撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让之请求）\n\n542. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 116 页，共 168 页\n\n543. 债务人通过其另一自我空壳公司向 Hamilton 作出 Hamilton 破产申请后转让。\n\n544. Hamilton 破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n545. Hamilton 破产申请后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n546. Hamilton 破产申请后转让构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转让。\n\n547. Hamilton 破产申请后转让可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第549(a)条撤销。\n\n依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条，受托人有权向 Hamilton 追回 Hamilton 破产申请后转让，或其价值，连同截至付款日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第九十二项请求\n（向 Hamilton Opportunity（汉密尔顿机会）的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code 第548(a)(1)(A)及550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n548. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n549. 债务人通过其另一自我实体作出 Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）破产申请前转让，具有阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n550. 债务人在实施 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让系利用另一自我空壳公司实施；\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 117 页，共 168 页\n\nb. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让被对债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，同时不使其财产受其债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，同时不使其财产受其债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n551. 受托人可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第548(a)(i)(A)条撤销 Hamilton Opportunity 转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第九十三项请求\n（向 Hamilton Opportunity 的转让）（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273、274及276条以及 Bankruptcy Code 第544(b)及550(a)条撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n552. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 118 页，共 168 页\n\n553. 债务人通过其另一自我实体作出 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让，具有阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n554. 债务人在实施 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和／或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让系利用另一自我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让被对债务人的债权人隐瞒；\n\nc. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让是债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分，在其控制的家庭成员及其他副手和下属的协助下实施，意图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，同时不使其财产受其债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让通过使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，同时不使其财产受其债权人追索，进一步促成了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时，债务人正被起诉，包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中对其提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时，债务人资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 119 页，共 168 页\n\n555. 受托人可依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(1)、274及276条以及 Bankruptcy Code 第544(b)条撤销 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第九十四项请求\n（向 Hamilton Opportunity 的转让）（依据 Bankruptcy Code 第548(a)(1)(B)及550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n556. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n557. 债务人就 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n558. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时，债务人已资不抵债，或因 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让而变得资不抵债。\n\n559. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地过少的资本。\n\n560. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其支付能力的债务。\n\n561. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，受托人可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第548(a)(1)(B)条撤销该等转让，并可依据 Bankruptcy Code 第550(a)条追回该等转让。\n\n第九十五项请求\n（向 Hamilton Opportunity 的转让）（依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law 第273(a)(2)、274及276条以及 Bankruptcy Code 第544(b)及550(a)条撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让之请求）\n\n562. 受托人重述并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，犹如在此完整列明。\n\n563. 债务人未就 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让获得合理等值对价。\n\n564. 在 Hamilton Opportunity（汉密尔顿机会公司）破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因 Rule of Law（法治）破产申请前转让而陷入资不抵债。\n\n565. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n566. 在 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或应当合理地相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n567. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请前转让可由管理人根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销，并可根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 追回。\n\n第九十六项请求\n（向 Hamilton Opportunity 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让）\n\n568. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 121 of 168\n\n569. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请后转让系债务人通过其作为另我（alter-ego）的空壳公司向 Hamilton Opportunity 作出。\n\n570. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n571. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n572. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请后转让构成对债务人第11章财产的未经授权转让。\n\n573. Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请后转让可根据 section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销。\n\n根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code，管理人有权向 Hamilton Opportunity 追回 Hamilton Opportunity 破产申请后转让，或其价值，加上截至付款日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第九十七项请求\n（向 Hamilton Capital（汉密尔顿资本）的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(A) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n574. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n575. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让系债务人通过其另我作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n576. 债务人在实施 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实表明：\n\na. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让系使用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 122 of 168\n\nb. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让是债务人为隐瞒和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下，作为其“空壳把戏”的一部分实施的；\n\nd. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受其债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受其债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括 PAX（PAX）在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\n577. Hamilton Capital 转让可由管理人根据 section 548(a)(i)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销，并可根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 追回。\n\n第九十八项请求\n（向 Hamilton Capital 的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 274, and 276, and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回实际欺诈性转让）\n\n578. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 123 of 168\n\n579. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让系债务人通过其另我作出，具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n580. 债务人在实施 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，除其他事项外，可由以下事实表明：\n\na. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让系使用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让是债务人为隐瞒和保护资产，在其家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属协助下，作为其“空壳把戏”的一部分实施的；\n\nd. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获益，而不使其财产受其债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让使债务人能够从其欺诈行为中获利，而不使其财产受其债权人追索，从而推进了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括 PAX 在 PAX 案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债或资本不足。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 124 of 168\n\n581. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让可由管理人根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276, and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销，并可根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 追回。\n\n第九十九项请求\n（向 Hamilton Capital 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 548(a)(1)(B) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n582. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n583. 债务人就 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n584. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或因 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让而陷入资不抵债。\n\n585. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n586. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n587. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让构成欺诈性转让，可由管理人根据 section 548(a)(1)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销，并可根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 追回。\n\n第一百项请求\n（向 Hamilton Capital 的转让）（根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and Bankruptcy Code sections 544(b) and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回推定欺诈性转让）\n\n588. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n589. 债务人就 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让未获得合理等值对价。\n\n590. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人已资不抵债，或债务人因 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让而陷入资不抵债。\n\n591. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人正在从事某项业务或交易，或者即将从事某项业务或交易，而债务人留存的任何财产构成不合理地不足的资本。\n\n592. 在 Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让发生时，债务人意图承担，或者相信或应当合理地相信其将承担，在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n593. Hamilton Capital 破产申请前转让可由管理人根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 and section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销，并可根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 追回。\n\n第一百零一项请求\n（向 Hamilton Capital 的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让）\n\n594. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 126 of 168\n\n595. Hamilton Capital 破产申请后转让系债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司向 Hamilton Capital 作出。\n\n596. Hamilton Capital 破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n597. Hamilton Capital 破产申请后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\n598. Hamilton Capital 破产申请后转让构成对债务人第11章财产的未经授权转让。\n\n599. Hamilton Capital 破产申请后转让可根据 section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销。\n\n600. 根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code，管理人有权向 Hamilton Capital 追回 Hamilton Capital 破产申请后转让，或其价值，加上截至付款日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第一百零二项请求\n（向 Himalaya Currency（喜马拉雅货币）的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让）\n\n601. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n602. Himalaya Currency 破产申请后转让系债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司向 Himalaya Currency 作出。\n\n603. Himalaya Currency 破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n604. Himalaya Currency 破产申请后转让未经破产法院或 Bankruptcy Code 授权。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 127 of 168\n\n605. Himalaya Currency 破产申请后转让构成对债务人第11章财产的未经授权转让。\n\n606. Himalaya Currency 破产申请后转让可根据 section 549(a) of the Bankruptcy Code 撤销。\n\n607. 根据 section 550(a) of the Bankruptcy Code，管理人有权向 Himalaya Currency 追回 Himalaya Currency 破产申请后转让，或其价值，加上截至付款日的利息及本案费用。\n\n第一百零三项请求\n（向 Himalaya Financial（喜马拉雅金融）的转让）（根据 Bankruptcy Code sections 549 and 550(a) 请求撤销并追回未经授权的破产申请后转让）\n\n608. 管理人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载指控，如同在此完整列明。\n\n609. Himalaya Financial 破产申请后转让系债务人通过其作为另我的空壳公司向 Himalaya Financial 作出。\n\n610. Himalaya Financial 破产申请后转让发生于申请日之后。\n\n611. Himalaya Financial 破产申请后转让未经该方授权。\n\n或由破产法庭或《破产法》授权。\n\n612. Himalaya Financial（喜马拉雅金融）破产申请后转移构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转移。\n\n613. Himalaya Financial破产申请后转移可根据《破产法》第549(a)条予以撤销。\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 128 页，共 168 页\n\n根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya Financial追回Himalaya Financial破产申请后转移，或其价值，并追回截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n第一百零四项请求\n（向Himalaya Reserves（喜马拉雅储备）作出的转移）（根据《破产法》第549条和第550(a)条请求撤销及追回未经授权的破产申请后转移）\n\n614. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n615. Himalaya Reserves破产申请后转移由债务人通过其另我空壳公司向Himalaya Currency（喜马拉雅货币）作出。\n\n616. Himalaya Reserves破产申请后转移发生于申请日之后。\n\n617. Himalaya Reserves破产申请后转移未经破产法庭或《破产法》授权。\n\n618. Himalaya Reserves破产申请后转移构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转移。\n\n619. Himalaya Reserves破产申请后转移可根据《破产法》第549(a)条予以撤销。\n\n620. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向Himalaya Reserves追回Himalaya Reserves破产申请后转移，或其价值，并追回截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n第一百零五项请求\n（向Saraca（萨拉卡）作出的转移）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条和第550(a)条请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转移）\n\n621. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n622. Saraca破产申请前转移由债务人通过其另我实体作出，且其具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n623. 债务人在实施Saraca破产申请前转移时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Saraca破产申请前转移系使用另我空壳公司实施；\n\nb. Saraca破产申请前转移对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Saraca破产申请前转移作为债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分实施，并借助债务人的家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属，以图隐匿和保护资产；\n\nd. Saraca破产申请前转移通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获益，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Saraca破产申请前转移通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获利，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 130 页，共 168 页\n\nf. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人正被起诉，\n\n其中包括PAX（PAX）在PAX案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n624. Saraca转移可由受托人根据《破产法》第548(a)(i)(A)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n第一百零六项请求\n（向Saraca作出的转移）（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、274和276条以及《破产法》第544(b)条和第550(a)条请求撤销及追回实际欺诈性转移）\n\n625. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n626. Saraca破产申请前转移由债务人通过其另我实体作出，且其具有阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的实际意图。\n\n627. 债务人在实施Saraca破产申请前转移时阻碍、拖延和/或欺诈其债权人的意图，尤其可由以下事实证明：\n\na. Saraca破产申请前转移系使用另我空壳\n\n公司实施；\n\nb. Saraca破产申请前转移对债务人的债权人予以隐瞒；\n\nc. Saraca破产申请前转移作为债务人“空壳游戏”的一部分实施，并借助债务人的家庭成员以及其控制的其他亲信和下属，以图隐匿和保护资产；\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 131 页，共 168 页\n\nd. Saraca破产申请前转移通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获益，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\ne. Saraca破产申请前转移通过使债务人能够从其欺诈中获利，而不使其财产受债权人追索，进一步助长了债务人的欺诈行为；\n\nf. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人正被起诉，其中包括PAX在PAX案件中提起的诉讼；以及\n\ng. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人无力偿债或资本不足。\n\n628. Saraca破产申请前转移可由受托人根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(1)、274和276条以及《破产法》第544(b)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n第一百零七项请求\n（向Saraca作出的转移）（根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条和第550(a)条请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转移）\n\n629. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n630. 债务人就Saraca破产申请前转移所获得的对价低于合理等值。\n\n631. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人无力偿债，或因Saraca破产申请前转移而陷于无力偿债。\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 132 页，共 168 页\n\n632. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人正在从事某项商业或交易，或即将从事某项商业或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n633. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人意图承担或相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n634. Saraca破产申请前转移构成欺诈性转移，可由受托人根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n第一百零八项请求\n（向Saraca作出的转移）\n（根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(2)、274和276条及《破产法》第544(b)条和第550(a)条请求撤销及追回推定欺诈性转移）\n\n635. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n636. 债务人就Saraca破产申请前转移未获得合理等值的对价。\n\n637. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人无力偿债，或债务人因Rule of Law（法治）破产申请前转移而陷于无力偿债。\n\n638. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人正在从事某项商业或交易，或即将从事某项商业或交易，而债务人保留的任何财产构成不合理地少量的资本。\n\n639. 在Saraca破产申请前转移时，债务人意图承担，或相信或理应相信其将承担在该等债务到期时超出其偿付能力的债务。\n\n640. Saraca破产申请前转移可由受托人根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(2)、274和276条及《破产法》第544(b)条予以撤销，并可根据《破产法》第550(a)条予以追回。\n第一百零九项请求\n（向GFI（GFI）作出的转移）（根据《破产法》第549条和第550(a)条请求撤销及追回未经授权的破产申请后转移）\n\n641. 受托人重申并再次主张第1至65段所载的指控，如同在本文中完整列明。\n\n642. GFI破产申请后转移由债务人通过其另我空壳公司向Hamilton Capital（汉密尔顿资本）作出。\n\n643. GFI破产申请后转移发生于申请日之后。\n\n644. GFI破产申请后转移未经破产法庭或《破产法》授权。\n\n645. GFI破产申请后转移构成对债务人第11章破产财产的未经授权转移。\n\n646. GFI破产申请后转移可根据《破产法》第549(a)条予以撤销。\n\n647. 根据《破产法》第550(a)条，受托人有权向GFI追回GFI破产申请后转移，或其价值，并追回截至付款之日的利息及本案费用。\n[本页其余部分有意留白。]\n救济请求\n\n因此，基于前述理由，受托人谨请求作出如下判决：\n\n1. 就第一项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$49,376,818.35的Lamp Capital（蓝普资本）破产申请前转移根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Lamp Capital破产申请前转移；以及(c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Lamp Capital追回Lamp Capital破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n2. 就第二项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$49,376,818.35的Lamp Capital破产申请前转移根据《破产法》第544(b)条及N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law第273(a)(1)、274和276条予以撤销，并就2020年4月4日之前的转移，根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、273a、275、276和278条予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销破产申请前转移；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Lamp Capital追回Lamp Capital破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n3. 就第三项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于$49,376,818.35的Lamp Capital破产申请前转移根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Lamp Capital破产申请前转移；以及(c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Lamp Capital追回Lamp Capital破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n案号 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 135 页，共 168 页\n\n4. 就第四项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告(a)金额不少于$49,376,818.35的Lamp Capital破产申请前转移根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273(a)(2)、274和276条予以撤销，并就2020年4月4日之前的请求，根据N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law第273、273a、275、276和278条予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Lamp Capital破产申请前转移；以及(c) 根据N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人破产财产的利益，向Lamp Capital追回Lamp Capital破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n5. 就第五项请求，作出一项命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法》第549条，金额不少于 \\$3,499,935.00 的 Lamp Capital（兰普资本）破产申请后转移应予撤销；(b) 指示撤销 Lamp Capital 破产申请后转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Lamp Capital 追回 Lamp Capital 破产申请后转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n6. 就第六项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于 \\$42,390,761.75 的 Golden Spring（金泉）破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Golden Spring 追回 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n7. 就第七项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第544(b)条和《纽约债务与债权人法》第273(a)(1)、274及276条，以及就2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，《纽约债务与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276及278条，金额不少于 \\$42,390,761.75 的 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移应予撤销；\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 136 页，共 168 页\n\n(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Golden Spring 追回 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n8. 就第八项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于 \\$42,390,761.75 的 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Golden Spring 追回 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n9. 就第九项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告：(a) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第273(a)(2)、274及276条，以及就2020年4月4日之前的请求权而言，《纽约债务与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276及278条，金额不少于 \\$42,390,761.75 的 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Golden Spring 追回 Golden Spring 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n10. 就第十项请求，作出一项命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法》第549条，金额不少于 \\$2,054,984.06 的 Golden Spring 破产申请后转移应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Golden Spring 破产申请后转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Golden Spring 追回 Golden Spring 破产申请后转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 137 页，共 168 页\n\n11. 就第十一项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于 \\$12,554,528.53 的 Greenwich Land（格林尼治土地）破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Greenwich Land 追回 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n12. 就第十二项请求，作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第544(b)条和《纽约债务与债权人法》第273(a)(1)、274及276条，以及就2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，《纽约债务与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276及278条，金额不少于 \\$12,554,528.53 的 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Greenwich Land 追回 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n13. 就第十三项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于 \\$12,554,528.53 的 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Greenwich Land 追回 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n14. 就第十四项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第273(a)(2)、274及276条，以及就2020年4月4日之前的请求权而言，金额不少于 \\$12,554,528.53 的 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移应予撤销；\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 138 页，共 168 页\n\n2020年，《纽约债务与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276及278条；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Greenwich Land 追回 Greenwich Land 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n15. 就第十五项请求，作出一项命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法》第549条，金额不少于 \\$550,000.00 的 Greenwich Land 破产申请后转移应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Greenwich Land 破产申请后转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Greenwich Land 追回 Greenwich Land 破产申请后转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n16. 就第十六项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于 \\$1,784,915.29 的 HCHK Technologies（HCHK科技）破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 HCHK Technologies 追回 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n17. 就第十七项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第544(b)条和《纽约债务与债权人法》第273(a)(1)、274及276条，以及就2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，《纽约债务与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276及278条，金额不少于 \\$1,784,915.29 的 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 HCHK Technologies 追回 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 139 页，共 168 页\n\n价值；\n\n18. 就第十八项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于 \\$1,784,915.29 的 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 HCHK Technologies 追回 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n19. 就第十九项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第273(a)(2)、274及276条，以及就2020年4月4日之前的请求权而言，《纽约债务与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276及278条，金额不少于 \\$1,784,915.29 的 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 HCHK Technologies 追回 HCHK Technologies 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n20. 就第二十项请求，作出一项命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法》第549条，金额不少于 \\$4,268,011.37 的 HCHK Technologies 破产申请后转移应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 HCHK Technologies 破产申请后转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 HCHK Technologies 追回 HCHK Technologies 破产申请后转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 140 页，共 168 页\n\n21. 就第二十一项请求，作出一项命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法》第549条，金额不少于 \\$1,128,921.69 的 HCHK Property（HCHK地产）破产申请后转移应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 HCHK Property 破产申请后转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 HCHK Property 追回 HCHK Property 破产申请后转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n22. 就第二十二项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于 \\$30,930,373.91 的 Lexington（列克星敦）破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Lexington 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Lexington 追回 Lexington 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n23. 就第二十三项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第544(b)条和《纽约债务与债权人法》第273(a)(1)、274及276条，以及就2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，《纽约债务与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276及278条，金额不少于 \\$30,930,373.91 的 Lexington 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Lexington 破产申请前转移；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权人法》第276条和《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，从 Lexington 追回 Lexington 破产申请前转移，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n24. 就第二十四项请求，(a) 作出一项命令，宣告根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于 \\$30,930,373.91 的 Lexington 破产申请前转移应予撤销；(b) 作出一项命令，指示撤销 Lexington 破产申请前转移\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交于 02/15/24 录入于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 141 页，共 168 页\n\n另行；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Lexington（莱克星顿）追回 Lexington 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n25. 就第二十五项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 $30,930,373.91 的 Lexington 申请破产前转移款项，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的债权而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Lexington 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Lexington 追回 Lexington 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n26. 就第二十六项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不少于 $4,178,030.29 的 Lexington 申请破产后转移款项，依据《破产法》section 549，予以撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Lexington 申请破产后转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Lexington 追回 Lexington 申请破产后转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n27. 就第二十七项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $18,704,990.00 的 Hudson Diamond（哈德逊钻石）申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Hudson Diamond 追回 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 142 of 168\n\n28. 就第二十八项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $18,704,990.00 的 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Hudson Diamond 追回 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n29. 就第二十九项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $18,704,990.00 的 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Hudson Diamond 追回 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n30. 就第三十项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 $18,704,990.00 的 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的债权而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Hudson Diamond 追回 Hudson Diamond 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 143 of 168\n\n31. 就第三十一项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $9,075,849.25 的 Leading Shine（领耀）申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Leading Shine 追回 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n32. 就第三十二项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $9,075,849.25 的 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Leading Shine 追回 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n33. 就第三十三项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $9,075,849.25 的 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Leading Shine 追回 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n34. 就第三十四项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 $9,075,849.25 的 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的债权而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 Leading Shine 追回 Leading Shine 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 144 of 168\n\n35. 就第三十五项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $72,654,694.57 的 G Club International（G Club International）申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club International 追回 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n36. 就第三十六项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $72,654,694.57 的 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club International 追回 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n37. 就第三十七项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $72,654,694.57 的 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club International 追回 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 145 of 168\n\n38. 就第三十八项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 $72,654,694.57 的 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的债权而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club International 追回 G Club International 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n39. 就第三十九项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不少于 $72,042,835.16 的 G Club International 申请破产后转移款项，依据《破产法》section 549，予以撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club International 申请破产后转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club International 追回 G Club International 申请破产后转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n40. 就第四十项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $110,000.00 的 G Club Operations（G Club运营）申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(A)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club Operations 追回 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 2925 Filed 02/15/24 Entered 02/15/24 22:02:58 Page 146 of 168\n\n41. 就第四十一项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $110,000.00 的 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 2020年4月4日之前的转移而言，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club Operations 追回 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n42. 就第四十二项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 $110,000.00 的 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项，依据《破产法》section 548(a)(1)(B)，予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项；以及 (c) 根据《破产法》section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产之利益，向 G Club Operations 追回 G Club Operations 申请破产前转移款项，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n43. 就第四十三项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$110,000.00 的 G Club Operations（G俱乐部运营公司）破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club Operations 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Club Operations 追回 G Club Operations 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 登记日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 147 页，共 168 页\n\n44. 就第四十四项诉请，请求作出裁定，(a) 宣告金额不少于 \\$5,050,000.00 的 G Club Operations 破产申请后转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549，应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Club Operations 破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Club Operations 追回 G Club Operations 破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n45. 就第四十五项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$3,420,750.00 的 G Fashion（G时尚公司）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Fashion 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Fashion 追回 G Fashion 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n46. 就第四十六项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$3,420,750.00 的 G Fashion 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Fashion 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Fashion 追回 G Fashion 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n47. 就第四十七项诉请，(a) 请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$3,420,750.00 的 G Fashion 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Fashion 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Fashion 追回 G Fashion 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 登记日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 148 页，共 168 页\n\n48. 就第四十八项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$3,420,750.00 的 G Fashion 破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Fashion 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Fashion 追回 G Fashion 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n49. 就第四十九项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$6,255,000.42 的 G Media（G媒体公司）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Media 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Media 追回 G Media 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n50. 就第五十项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$6,255,000.42 的 G Media 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Media 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Media 追回 G Media 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 登记日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 149 页，共 168 页\n\n51. 就第五十一项诉请，(a) 请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$6,255,000.42 的 G Media 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Media 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Media 追回 G Media 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n52. 就第五十二项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$6,255,000.42 的 G Media 破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 G Media 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 G Media 追回 G Media 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n53. 就第五十三项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$1,100,000.00 的 Rule of Law（法治公司）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law 追回 Hudson Diamond（哈德逊钻石公司）破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n54. 就第五十四项，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$1,100,000.00 的 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law 追回 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 登记日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 150 页，共 168 页\n\n55. 就第五十五项诉请，(a) 请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$1,100,000.00 的 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law 追回 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n56. 就第五十六项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$1,100,000.00 的 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law 追回 Rule of Law 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n57. 就第五十七项诉请，请求作出裁定，(a) 宣告金额不少于 \\$852,500.00 的 Rule of Law 破产申请后转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 549，应予撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law 破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law 追回 Rule of Law 破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 登记日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 151 页，共 168 页\n\n58. 就第五十八项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$200,000.00 的 Rule of Law Society（法治协会）破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(A)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law Society 追回 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n59. 就第五十九项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$200,000.00 的 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 544(b) 和 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law Society 追回 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n60. 就第六十项诉请，(a) 请求作出裁定，宣告金额不少于 \\$200,000.00 的 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让，根据 Bankruptcy Code section 548(a)(1)(B)，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law Society 追回 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 登记日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 152 页，共 168 页\n\n61. 就第六十一项诉请，请求作出裁定，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$200,000.00 的 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276，以及就 April 4, 2020 之前的债权而言，根据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278，应予撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和 Bankruptcy Code section 550(a)(1)，为债务人财产利益，从 Rule of Law Society 追回 Rule of Law Society 破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n62. 就第六十二项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不少于 \\$1,122,550.00 的 Rule of Law Society（法治协会）申请后转让依据《破产法典》第 549 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Rule of Law Society 申请后转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Rule of Law Society 追回该等 Rule of Law Society 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n63. 就第六十三项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$9,600,000.00 的 GFNY（纽约郭媒体）申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 GFNY 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 GFNY 追回该等 GFNY 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n64. 就第六十四项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$9,600,000.00 的 GFNY 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 544(b) 条以及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 GFNY 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 GFNY 追回该等 GFNY 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 153 页，共 168 页\n\n65. 就第六十五项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$9,600,000.00 的 GFNY 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 GFNY 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 GFNY 追回该等 GFNY 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n66. 就第六十六项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$9,600,000.00 的 GFNY 申请前转让依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的请求，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 GFNY 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 GFNY 追回该等 GFNY 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n67. 就第六十七项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不少于 \\$8,966,163.07 的 GFNY 申请后转让依据《破产法典》第 549 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 GFNY 申请后转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 GFNY 追回该等 GFNY 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 154 页，共 168 页\n\n68. 就第六十八项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$5,800,000.00 的 Anton Development（安东开发公司）申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Anton Development 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Anton Development 追回该等 Anton Development 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n69. 就第六十九项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$5,800,000.00 的 Anton Development 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 544(b) 条以及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Anton Development 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Anton Development 追回该等 Anton Development 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n70. 就第七十项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$5,800,000.00 的 Anton Development 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Anton Development 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Anton Development 追回该等 Anton Development 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n71. 就第七十一项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$5,800,000.00 的 Anton Development 申请前转让依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的请求，\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 155 页，共 168 页\n\n依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Anton Development 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Anton Development 追回该等 Anton Development 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n72. 就第七十二项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$109,166,373.33 的 Himalaya Intl.（喜马拉雅国际）申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Himalaya Intl. 追回该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n73. 就第七十三项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$109,166,373.33 的 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 544(b) 条以及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Himalaya Intl. 追回该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n74. 就第七十四项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$109,166,373.33 的 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Himalaya Intl. 追回该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 156 页，共 168 页\n\n；\n\n75. 就第七十五项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$109,166,373.33 的 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的请求，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Himalaya Intl. 追回该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n76. 就第七十六项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不少于 \\$34,715,573.08 的 Himalaya Intl. 申请后转让依据《破产法典》第 549 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请后转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 Himalaya Intl. 追回该等 Himalaya Intl. 申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n77. 就第七十七项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$256,000.00 的 China Golden（中国黄金）申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(A) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 China Golden 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 China Golden 追回该等 China Golden 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 2925 提交于 02/15/24 登记于 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 157 页，共 168 页\n\n78. 就第七十八项请求，作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$256,000.00 的 China Golden 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 544(b) 条以及 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(1), 274, and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 China Golden 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 China Golden 追回该等 China Golden 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n79. 就第七十九项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告金额不少于 \\$256,000.00 的 China Golden 申请前转让依据《破产法典》第 548(a)(1)(B) 条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 China Golden 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 China Golden 追回该等 China Golden 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n80. 就第八十项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不少于 \\$256,000.00 的 China Golden 申请前转让依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273(a)(2), 274 and 276 予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的请求，依据 N.Y. Debt. & Cred. Law sections 273, 273a, 275, 276 and 278 予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销该等 China Golden 申请前转让；以及 (c) 依据 N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law section 276 和《破产法典》第 550(a)(1) 条，为债务人破产财产之利益，从 China Golden 追回该等 China Golden 申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n81. 就第八十一项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不少于 \\$3,710,933.00 的 GF Italy（意大利郭媒体）申请后转让依据《破产法典》第 549 条予以撤销\n\n《破产法典》；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销GF Italy破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向GF Italy追回GF Italy破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n82. 就第八十二项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于$26,625,000.00的ACA破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销ACA破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向ACA追回ACA破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n83. 就第八十三项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第544(b)条以及《纽约债务人与债权人法》（N.Y. Debt & Cred. Law）第273(a)(1)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的转让而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$26,625,000.00的ACA破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销ACA破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向ACA追回ACA破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n84. 就第八十四项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于$26,625,000.00的ACA破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销ACA破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向ACA追回ACA破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案号22-50073 文书2925 提交日期02/15/24 登记日期02/15/24 22:02:58 第159页，共168页\n\n85. 就第八十五项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273(a)(2)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的请求而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$26,625,000.00的ACA破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销ACA破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向ACA追回ACA破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n86. 就第八十六项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法典》第549条，金额不少于$31,232,657.00的ACA破产申请后转让予以撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销ACA破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向ACA追回ACA破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n87. 就第八十七项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于$3,209,061.04的Hamilton破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton追回Hamilton破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n88. 就第八十八项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第544(b)条以及《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273(a)(1)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的转让而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$3,209,061.04的Hamilton破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton追回Hamilton破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案号22-50073 文书2925 提交日期02/15/24 登记日期02/15/24 22:02:58 第160页，共168页\n\nHamilton破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值，并根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton追回该等转让；\n\n89. 就第八十九项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于$3,209,061.04的Hamilton破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton追回Hamilton破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n90. 就第九十项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273(a)(2)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的请求而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$3,209,061.04的Hamilton破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton追回Hamilton破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n91. 就第九十一项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法典》第549条，金额不少于$37,333,500.00的Hamilton破产申请后转让予以撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton追回Hamilton破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值\n\n案号22-50073 文书2925 提交日期02/15/24 登记日期02/15/24 22:02:58 第161页，共168页\n\n92. 就第九十二项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于$151,496,699.43的Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Opportunity追回Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n93. 就第九十三项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第544(b)条以及《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273(a)(1)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的转让而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$151,496,699.43的Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Opportunity追回Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n94. 就第九十四项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于$151,496,699.43的Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Opportunity追回Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n95. 就第九十五项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273(a)(2)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的请求而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$151,496,699.43的Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Opportunity追回Hamilton Opportunity破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案号22-50073 文书2925 提交日期02/15/24 登记日期02/15/24 22:02:58 第162页，共168页\n\n96. 就第九十六项请求，作出命令：(a) 宣告根据《破产法典》第549条，金额不少于$192,899,889.20的Hamilton Opportunity破产申请后转让予以撤销；以及 (b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Opportunity破产申请后转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Opportunity追回Hamilton Opportunity破产申请后转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n97. 就第九十七项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(A)条，金额不少于$13,429,900.98的Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Capital追回Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n98. 就第九十八项请求，作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第544(b)条以及《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273(a)(1)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的转让而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$13,429,900.98的Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Capital追回Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n案号22-50073 文书2925 提交日期02/15/24 登记日期02/15/24 22:02:58 第163页，共168页\n\n99. 就第九十九项请求，(a) 作出命令，宣告根据《破产法典》第548(a)(1)(B)条，金额不少于$13,429,900.98的Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Capital追回Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n100. 就第一百项请求，作出命令，宣告：(a) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273(a)(2)、274和276条，且就2020年4月4日之前的请求而言，根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第273、273a、275、276和278条，金额不少于$13,429,900.98的Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让予以撤销；(b) 作出命令，指示撤销Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让；以及 (c) 根据《纽约债务人与债权人法》第276条和《破产法典》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产利益，向Hamilton Capital追回Hamilton Capital破产申请前转让，或由受托人选择追回其价值；\n\n101. 就第一百零一项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$44,164,391.38 的 Hamilton Capital（汉密尔顿资本）期后转让根据《破产法》第549条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Hamilton Capital 期后转让；及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Hamilton Capital 追偿 Hamilton Capital 期后转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 164 页，共 168 页\n\n102. 就第一百零二项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$180,000.00 的 Himalaya Currency（喜马拉雅货币）期后转让根据《破产法》第549条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Himalaya Currency 期后转让；及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Himalaya Currency 追偿 Himalaya Currency 期后转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n103. 就第一百零三项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$51,712,920.60 的 Himalaya Financial（喜马拉雅金融）期后转让根据《破产法》第549条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Himalaya Financial 期后转让；及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Himalaya Financial 追偿 Himalaya Financial 期后转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n104. 就第一百零四项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$267,000,000.00 的 Himalaya Reserves（喜马拉雅储备）期后转让根据《破产法》第549条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Himalaya Reserves 期后转让；及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Himalaya Reserves 追偿 Himalaya Reserves 期后转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n105. 就第一百零五项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$7,524,940.00 的 Saraca（萨拉卡）期前转让根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(A)条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Saraca 期前转让；及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Saraca 追偿 Saraca 期前转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 165 页，共 168 页\n\n106. 就第一百零六项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$7,524,940.00 的 Saraca 期前转让根据《破产法》第544(b)条以及《纽约债务与债权法》第273(a)(1)、274及276条予以撤销；就发生于 April 4, 2020 之前的转让，根据《纽约债务与债权法》第273、273a、275、276及278条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Saraca 期前转让；及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权法》第276条及《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Saraca 追偿 Saraca 期前转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n107. 就第一百零七项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$7,524,940.00 的 Saraca 期前转让根据《破产法》第548(a)(1)(B)条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Saraca 期前转让；及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Saraca 追偿 Saraca 期前转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n108. 就第一百零八项诉请，请求作出命令，宣告：(a) 金额不低于 \\$7,524,940.00 的 Saraca 期前转让根据《纽约债务与债权法》第273(a)(2)、274及276条予以撤销；就 April 4, 2020 之前的请求，根据《纽约债务与债权法》第273、273a、275、276及278条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 Saraca 期前转让；及 (c) 根据《纽约债务与债权法》第276条及《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 Saraca 追偿 Saraca 期前转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 166 页，共 168 页\n\n109. 就第一百零九项诉请，请求作出命令：(a) 宣告金额不低于 \\$3,350,025.77 的 GFI（GFI）期后转让根据《破产法》第549条予以撤销；(b) 命令撤销 GFI 期后转让；及 (c) 根据《破产法》第550(a)(1)条，为债务人财产之利益，向 GFI 追偿 GFI 期后转让，或由受托人选择追偿其价值；\n\n110. 裁定自提交本起诉状之日起至本案判决之日止，按最高法定利率向受托人支付判决前利息；及\n\n111. 法院在此情形下认为公正、适当或符合衡平原则的其他及进一步救济。\n［本页其余部分有意留白］\n\n案件 22-50073 文书 2925 提交日期 02/15/24 录入日期 02/15/24 22:02:58 第 167 页，共 168 页\n\n日期：February 15, 2024　New Haven, CT\n\nLUC A. DESPINS 第11章受托人\n\n签署人：/s/ Patrick R. Linsey\nDouglas S. Skalka (ct00616)\nPatrick R. Linsey (ct29437)\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\ndskalka@npmlaw.com\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n第11章受托人代理律师\n附表密封提交\n英文","key_entities":["Himalaya","HCHK","Je","Saraca","Despins","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Miles Guo","Yanping Wang","GTV","GETTR","Paul Hastings","RICO","Pro Se","pro se"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":215,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":44106,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-02-15 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-02-15","updated_at":"2026-08-23 23:07:31"}