{"id":"court_ctb_3100_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":3100,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2024-04-12","title":"IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT In re:","summary_zh":"异议书 —— Ho Wan Kwok 破产案（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo），CTB 22-50073 ECF #3100（2024-04-12立案）。Weddle Law PLLC 律所对受托人修改撤销权追索程序以引入强制调解的动议提出异议，指责受托人试图将集中提起数百起诉讼带来的程序负担和高额费用强加给被告方。","summary_en":"Objection — In re Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui), CTB 22-50073 ECF #3100 (filed 2024-04-12). Law firm Weddle Law PLLC objected to the Trustee's motion to modify avoidance action procedures to include mandatory mediation, contending it impermissibly shifts the burden and costs of the Trustee's hundreds of avoidance actions onto defendants.","body_en":"### **IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT**\n\nIn re:\n\nHO WAN KWOK, *et al.*,\n\nDebtors.\n\nChapter 11\n\nCase No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n\n(Jointly Administered)\n\n## **OBJECTION OF WEDDLE LAW PLLC TO CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE'S MOTION, PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(A) AND 363, FEDERAL RULES OF BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE 7016, 7026, AND 9006, AND DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 7016-1, TO MODIFY PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO AVOIDANCE CLAIM ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS TO INCLUDE PROCEDURES FOR MEDIATION OF AVOIDANCE ACTIONS**\n\nWeddle Law PLLC (\"**Weddle Law**\"), by and through its undersigned counsel herein files its objection, to: (1) the *Chapter 11 Trustee's Motion, Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a) and 363, Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 7016, 7026, And 9006, and District of Connecticut Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, to Modify Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings to Include Procedures for Mediation of Avoidance Actions* [Doc No. 3003] (the \"**Motion**\"); and (2) to the *Notice of Filing [Revised Proposed] Amended Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* (the \"**Revised Proposed Order**\") [Doc. No. 3035] and in support thereof, respectfully states as follows:\n\n## **PRELIMINARY STATEMENT**\n\n1. Weddle Law, like a number of other law firms, finds itself subjected to litigation in this bankruptcy case as a result of receiving transfers in payment for legal services provided, in the ordinary course of business, to legal entities that, at the time of the transfers, had not filed for bankruptcy, been adjudicated to be or scheduled as assets of a bankruptcy estate, or substantively consolidated with the Debtors. The trustee now alleges that these entities are \"alter egos\" of the\n\nDebtors, and based on that after-the-fact claim, has brought an avoidance action against Weddle Law to recover the fees paid for services already provided.\n\n2. The Trustee's Motion and Revised Proposed Order seeks to force Weddle Law into a mediation process that, as proposed, will materially increase the costs to Weddle Law, will require procedures that are one-sided and involuntary, backed up by bespoke coercive sanctions procedures that go beyond existing laws and rules.\n\n3. Accordingly, Weddle Law objects to the Motion and Revised Proposed Order and requests that this Court deny it in its entirety. Weddle Law recognizes that the Trustee's filing of more than 250 adversary actions on the eve of the two-year deadline creates an administrative crisis for the Court and the Trustee, but the Trustee should not be permitted to impose costly, coercive, and one-sided procedures on Weddle Law as a means of mitigating an administrative crisis the Trustee created. *See In re Amagansett Family Farm, Inc.*, Case No: 11-73929-AST, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4161, at \\*14 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2011).\n\n## **PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND PRECEDING THE FILING OF ANY ACTION AGAINST WEDDLE LAW**\n\n4. On January 29, 2024, the Trustee filed his *Motion, Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §105(a), Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 7016, 7026 and 9006, and District Court Local Bankruptcy Rule 7016-1, To Approve Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings (ECN No. 253 for Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* [Doc No. 2532] (the \"**Procedures Motion**\"). Through the Procedures Motion, the Trustee requested that the Court approve certain procedures to govern the avoidance actions filed and to be filed by the Trustee.\n\n{00360367.1 } 2 5. On February 7, 2024, the Court entered an order approving the Procedures Motion [Doc. No. 2578].\n\n### **PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND AFTER THE FILING AGAINST WEDDLE LAW**\n\n6. On February 13, 2024, the Trustee filed a complaint against Weddle Law seeking to avoid transfers to Weddle Law from HCHK Technologies, HCHK Property Management, and G Club Operations. Although those transfers were from entities that, at the time, had not filed for bankruptcy, been adjudicated to be assets of the Debtors or substantively consolidated with the Debtors, and had not been listed on schedules of the Debtors' assets, the Trustee's complaint claims that the transfers are post-petition transfers of estate assets avoidable under 11 U.S.C. § 549.\n\n7. On March 15, 2024, the Trustee filed his Motion seeking an order requiring revising the procedures approved by the Court to include procedures for mandatory mediation of certain Avoidance Actions.\n\n8. On March 22, 2024, the Trustee filed his Revised Proposed Order. The Revised Proposed Order set for the proposed procedures to govern mediation of certain avoidance actions, among other requested changes.\n\n9. On March 22, 2024, the Court also entered a Scheduling Order concerning the Amended Procedures Motion [Doc. No. 3037] (the \"**Scheduling Order**\") requiring any response to the Motion to be filed by April 12, 2024 and scheduling a hearing on the Motion for April 23, 2024.\n\n10. By order of the Court, the deadline for Weddle Law to move or respond to the Complaint is April 20, 2024.\n\n11. Since the filing of the Motion, Weddle Law's counsel has discussed the same with the Trustee's counsel and the parties have attempted to resolve disputes concerning the language of the order and certain provisions contained therein. The parties made some progress and were able to narrow the issues in dispute. To that end, the Trustee provided the undersigned with a\n\nproposed revised version of the Revised Proposed Order on April 10, 2024. A copy of the April 10th version of the Revised Proposed Order drafted by the Trustee is attached hereto as **Exhibit A**[.](#page-3-0) 1\n\n12. Although the Trustee agreed to make the (redlined) changes contained in **Exhibit A**, the April 10th version of the Revised Procedures Order does not address all of the concerns of Weddle Law with respect to proposed mediation procedures.\n\n### **OBJECTION TO PROPOSED AMENDED ORDER, IN PART**\n\n13. Weddle Law objects to the April 10th version of the Revised Procedures Order, in part, for the following reasons:\n\n(i) Rather than limiting its reach to mediation and procedures, the Revised Proposed Order creates trap doors in which Avoidance Action Defendants waive substantive defenses, such as service process of process when a defendant is served with a \"Redacted Avoidance Complaint.\" **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(d). A motion establishing procedures should not decide a substantive issue such as the adequacy of service of process well before Weddle Law has had an opportunity to be heard on the issue.\n\n(ii) The Revised Proposed Order does not clearly delineate which actions are stayed and partially stayed and therefore, must be clarified by the Trustee as ordered by this Court to prevent any Avoidance Action Defendant from inadvertently violating one of the many orders in these Chapter 11 cases. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(e)(ii).\n\n<span id=\"page-3-0\"></span><sup>{00360367.1 }</sup> 4 <sup>1</sup> Although the Trustee has not yet docketed the April 10th version of the Revised Proposed Order, the Trustee's counsel has represented that the Trustee has consented to the redline changes made by the Trustee in **Exhibit A**.\n\n(iii) The Revised Proposed Order seeks to establish one-sided mediation procedures. Thus, the Revised Proposed Order empowers the Trustee to select mediators to serve on a mediation panel and provides no opportunity for input by any of the avoidance action defendants. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(k). While input from both parties is typical in alternative dispute resolution, courts in this Circuit have appointed the mediator without input from all parties as being unwieldy. *See In Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y.*, 634 B.R. 839, 846 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2021). Accordingly, the composition of the panel should be left to the sole discretion of Judge Tancredi.\n\n(iv) Similarly, the Revised Proposed Order's attempt to permit the Trustee (and only the Trustee) with *ex parte* access to Judge Trancredi is one-sided and should not be adopted. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(r). Mediation is a process that does not work unless it is not only fair, but is seen to be fair by all participants. Providing the Trustee with control over the composition of the mediation panel and special, one-sided *ex parte*  access to Judge Tancredi undermines any appearance of fairness to the process.\n\n(v) The order provides that if avoidance action defendants do not believe that the claims against them should be mediated, they must establish \"good cause\" to exempt such claims from the mediation procedures. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(i). \"Good cause\" is not defined in the order. As settlement of a claim is voluntary act, participation in mediation should be as well. Courts in this Circuit have struck down such compulsory mediation attendance requirements. *See Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y.*, 634 B.R. at 845; *In re A.T. Reynolds & Sons, Inc.*, 452 B.R. 374 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). If a defendant wants its day in court to test the merits of the Trustee's claims, it should be able to \"opt out\" of the mediation procedures without having to file a motion and meet some undefined standard in order to do so. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(m). Such a procedure only serves to run up costs for avoidance action defendants and undermines the purpose of mediation – to procure a voluntary compromise, if one may be reached in the applicable avoidance action. Accordingly, avoidance action defendants should be able to opt-out of mediation without a showing of good cause or unnecessary, expensive motion practice.\n\n(vi) The Revised Proposed Order, as currently drafted (whether unintentionally or not), prevents testimony or documents presented in mediation from being used or produced in the litigation forum. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(q). For the avoidance of doubt, Weddle Law has clarified this provision so that mediation cannot be used as a shield by the Trustee to refuse to turnover discovery that is available through alternative means such as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Bankruptcy and evidence.\n\n(vii) The Revised Proposed Order's requirement that defendants share the fees of any mediation should not be adopted. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(u). Such fee sharing is inappropriate in these 270 avoidance actions. In contrast to defendants like Weddle Law—which are already forced to incur litigation costs as a result of the Trustee's adversary action—the Trustee's legal fees are paid out of the estate, as are, no doubt, the Trustee's share of any mediation fees. (The Trustee's own law firm has received over \\$20 million in professional fees to date. [2](#page-5-0) ) It is therefore only defendants who are subjected to an additional financial burden by being required to share mediation fees, which converts the mediation from a fair, voluntary process, into a one-sided tax on defendants. Here, the Trustee should not be able to shift the burden of this already costly process to the Avoidance Action Defendants. The Trustee\n\n<span id=\"page-5-0\"></span><sup>{00360367.1 }</sup> 6 <sup>2</sup> *See Fourth Interim Fee Application of Paul Hastings LLP for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses for Period From September 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023* [Doc. No. 2935].\n\nbrought the avoidance actions, and the Trustee is the party that wishes to compel Weddle Law to mediate issues underlying the complaint. The Trustee should therefore be required to pay the costs of the mediation. *See In re Verasun Energy Corporation, et al.*, Case No. 08-12606 (BLS) [Doc. No. 2940] (D. Del. Dec 21, 2010) (requiring the party that compelled mediation to cover the entire cost of the mediation); *In re Red Rose, Inc.*, Case No. BK-S-20-12814-MKN [Doc. No. 1992] (D. Nev. Aug 12, 2021) (same).\n\n(viii) The Revised Proposed Order inappropriately creates a bespoke administrative and self-effectuating process to impact sanctions on defendants that runs afoul of established statutory requirements to seek sanctions against a litigant, and that improperly seeks to coerce defendants into settling. Such procedures must be stricken from any mediation procedures order. **Exhibit A**, April 10th Version of the Revised Proposed Order at ¶ 2(v).\n\n14. Attached hereto as **Exhibit B** are Weddle Law's proposed revisions (set forth in redline) to the April 10th version of the Revised Proposed Order addressing the above issues with the order as well as other minor revisions.\n\n15. Weddle Law expressly reserves all of its rights in all respects, including, without limitation, its rights to supplement this objection, to object to any amended mediation and/or avoidance action procedures proposed by the Trustee or any other party in these chapter 11 cases, and to move for additional and further relief. Weddle Law also does not waive, and expressly preserves, all objections and defenses to the action, including but not limited to objections based on jurisdiction, improper venue, and the adequacy of service of process.\n\n16. Weddle Law also joins in the objections submitted by the other objectors to the Motion and the Revised Procedures Order.\n\n### **CONCLUSION**\n\n17. For the foregoing reasons, Weddle Law respectfully requests that the Court modify the Revised Procedures Order with the proposed changes set forth in **Exhibit B** hereto.\n\nDated: April 12, 2024 WEDDLE LAW PLLC\n\nBy: */s/ Kellianne Baranowsky* GREEN & SKLARZ LLC Jeffrey M. Sklarz Kellianne Baranowsky One Audubon St, 3rd Floor New Haven, CT 06511 Tel: 203-285-8545 jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com kbaranowsky@gs-lawfirm.com\n\nand\n\nRichard J. Corbi (Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending) The Law Offices of Richard J. Corbi PLLC 1501 Broadway, 12th Floor New York, NY 10036 [rcorbi@corbilaw.com](mailto:rcorbi@corbilaw.com)\n\n*Counsel to Weddle Law PLLC*\n\n### **CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**\n\nI hereby certify that on the date set forth below, a copy of the foregoing was served via CM/ECF. Parties may access this filing through the Court's CM/ECF system.\n\nDate: April 12, 2024\n\n*/s/Kellianne Baranowsky* Kellianne Baranowsky\n\n# **EXHIBIT A**\n\n*Trustee's April 10th Version of Proposed Amended Procedures Order*\n\n#### **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>In re:<br>1<br>HO WAN KWOK, et al.,<br>Debtors.<br>-----------------------------------------------------x----- | x<br>:<br>Chapter 11<br>:<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)<br>:<br>:<br>(Jointly Administered)<br>:<br>:<br>x                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11<br>TRUSTEE,<br>Plaintiff,<br>v.                                                                                                                    | :<br>Adv. Proc. Nos. 24-05005, 24-05006, 24-05007,<br>:<br>24-05008, 24-05009, 24-05010, 24-05011, 24-<br>:<br>:<br>05012, 24-05013, 24-05014, 24-05015, 24-05016,<br>:<br>24-05017, 24-05018, 24-05019, 24-05020, 24-<br>:<br>05021, 24-05022, 24-05023, 24-05024, 24-05025,<br>:<br>24-05026, 24-05027, 24-05028, 24-05029, 24-<br>:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |\n| AVOIDANCE DEFENDANTS<br>Defendants.                                                                                                                                           | 05030, 24-05031, 24-05032, 24-05033, 24-05034,<br>:<br>24-05035, 24-05036, 24-05037, 24-05038, 24-<br>:<br>:<br>05039, 24-05040, 24-05041, 24-05042, 24-05043,<br>:<br>24-05044, 24-05045, 24-05046, 24-05047, 24-<br>x<br>05048, 24-05049, 24-05050, 24-05051, 24-05052,<br>24-05053, 24-05054, 24-05055, 24-05056, 24-<br>05057, 24-05058, 24-05059, 24-05060, 24-05061,<br>24-05062, 24-05063, 24-05064, 24-05065, 24-<br>05066, 24-05067, 24-05068, 24-05069, 24-05070,<br>24-05071, 24-05072, 24-05073, 24-05074, 24-<br>05075, 24-05076, 24-05077, 24-05078, 24-05079,<br>24-05080, 24-05081, 24-05082, 24-05083, 24-<br>05084, 24-05085, 24-05086, 24-05087, 24-05088,<br>24-05089, 24-05090, 24-05091, 24-05092, 24-<br>05093, 24-05094, 24-05095, 24-05096, 24-05097,<br>24-05098, 24-05099, 24-05100, 24-05101, 24- |\n| (caption continues on next page)                                                                                                                                              | 05102, 24-05102, 24-05103, 24-05104, 24-05105,<br>24-05106, 24-05107, 24-05108, 24-05109, 24-                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n05110, 24-05111, 24-05112, 24-05113, 24-05114, 24-05115, 24-05116, 24-05117, 24-05118, 24- 05119, 24-05120, 24-05121, 24-05122, 24-05123, 24-05124, 24-05125, 24-05126, 24-05127, 24- 05128, 24-05129, 24-05130, 24-05131, 24-05132, 24-05133, 24-05134, 24-05135, 24-05136, 24- 05137, 24-05138, 24-05139, 24-05140, 24-05141, 24-05142, 24-05143, 24-05144, 24-05145, 24- 05146, 24-05147, 24-05148, 24-05149, 24-05150, 24-05151, 24-05152, 24-05153, 24-05154, 24- 05155, 24-05156, 24-05157, 24-05158, 24-05159, 24-05160, 24-05161, 24-05162, 24-05163, 24- 05164, 24-05165, 24-05166, 24-05167, 24-05168, 24-05169, 24-05170, 24-05171, 24-05172, 24- 05173, 24-05174, 24-05175, 24-05176, 24-05177, 24-05178, 24-05179, 24-05180, 24-05181, 24- 05182, 24-05183, 24-05184, 24-05185, 24-05186, 24-05187, 24-05188, 24-05189, 24-05190, 24- 05191, 24-05192, 24-05193, 24-05194, 24-05195, 24-05196, 24-05197, 24-05198, 24-05199, 24- 05200, 24-05201, 24-05202, 24-05203, 24-05204, 24-05205, 24-05206, 24-05207, 24-05208, 24- 05209, 24-05210, 24-05211, 24-05212, 24-05213, 24-05214, 24-05215, 24-05216, 24-05217, 24- 05218, 24-05219, 24-05220, 24-05221, 24-05222, 24-05223, 24-05224, 24-05225, 24-05226, 24- 05227, 24-05228, 24-05229, 24-05230, 24-05231, 24-05232, 24-05233, 24-05234, 24-05235, 24- 05236, 24-05237, 24-05238, 24-05239, 24-05240, 24-05241, 24-05242, 24-05243, 24-05244, 24- 05245, 24-05246, 24-05247, 24-05248, 24-05250, 24-05251, 24-05252, 24-05253, 24-05254, 24- 05255, 24-05256, 24-05257, 24-05258, 24-05259, 24-05260, 24-05261, 24-05262, 24-05263, 24- 05264, 24-05265, 24-05266, 24-05267, 24-05268, 24-05269, 24-05270, 24-05271, 24-05272, 24- 05274, 24-05275\n\n----------------------------------------------------x\n\n#### **[REVISED PROPOSED] AMENDED ORDER APPROVING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO AVOIDANCE CLAIM ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS**\n\nUpon the motion (the \"Motion\")<sup>2</sup> of Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in the chapter 11 case of Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\"), for the entry of an order (this \"Order\"), pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the \"Bankruptcy Code\"), Rules 7016, 7026, and 9006 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the \"Bankruptcy Rules\"), and Rule 7016-1 of the District of Connecticut Local Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the \"Local Bankruptcy Rules\"), to modify the Court's *Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* [ECF No. 2578] (the \"Avoidance Procedures Order\") and thereby modifying the Avoidance Action Procedures to provide for the inclusion of certain procedures governing mediation of Avoidance Actions; and this Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief requested therein in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the *Standing Order of Reference* from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; and consideration of the Motion and the relief requested therein being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and the Court having found that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interest of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate, its creditors, and all parties in interest; and due and sufficient notice of the Motion having been given under the particular circumstances; and it appearing that no other or further notice need be given; and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court, including a hearing held April 23, 2024; and any objections to the relief requested herein having been withdrawn or overruled on the merits; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:\n\n1. The Motion is granted as set forth herein.\n\n<sup>2</sup> Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Order have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.\n\n2. The Court hereby orders that the following amended Avoidance Action Procedures\n\nshall govern the Avoidance Actions:\n\na. The Avoidance Action Procedures shall apply to any adversary proceedings commenced by the Trustee on or after February 1, 2024, in which the Trustee asserts claims solely under sections 544, 547, 548, 549, and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and analogous claims under applicable state law (the \"Avoidance Actions\").\n\nb. Upon filing a complaint commencing any Avoidance Action (an \"Avoidance Complaint\"), the Trustee shall file a Notice of Applicability of Avoidance Action Procedures in a form substantially similar to that attached hereto as **Exhibit 1** (the \"Avoidance Action Procedures Notice\"). The Trustee shall serve a copy of the Avoidance Action Procedures Notice on each defendant in an Avoidance Action (an \"Avoidance Defendant\") together with the Summons and Avoidance Complaint pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7004.\n\nc. Motions affecting multiple Avoidance Actions shall be filed in each applicable Avoidance Action and shall use a caption substantially in the form attached hereto as **Exhibit 2**.\n\nd. To the extent that an Avoidance Complaint (including exhibits) contains information that is designated confidential or highly confidential pursuant to the Protective Order [Main Case ECF No. 923] (the \"Protective Order\") and the Stipulated Addendum to Protective Order [Main Case ECF No. 2460] (the \"P.O. Addendum\"), the Trustee may file the Avoidance Complaint under seal (a \"Sealed Avoidance Complaint\"), provided, however, the Trustee shall file unsealed a copy of the Avoidance Complaint that redacts any information that is designated confidential or highly confidential (a \"Redacted Avoidance Complaint\"). Service of a Redacted Avoidance Complaint shall constitute sufficient service of a complaint as required by Bankruptcy Rule 7004. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Protective Order and the P.O. Addendum, upon any Avoidance Defendant and its counsel each executing copies of Exhibit A to the Protective Order and, if applicable, Exhibit A to the P.O. Addendum, the Trustee may provide a copy of the unredacted Avoidance Complaint to such Avoidance Defendant.\n\ne. An Avoidance Defendant's time to respond to any Avoidance Complaint (the \"Response Date\") shall be sixty (60) days from the date that service is effected on such Avoidance Defendant, *provided, however*, that, without further order of the Court, the Trustee and any Avoidance Defendant may stipulate to further extend the defendant's Response Date up to ninety (90) additional days. Any such stipulation shall be made in writing and filed on the docket in the applicable adversary proceeding.Avoidance Action. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary:\n\ni. the Avoidance Actions set forth on **Exhibit 3-A** attached hereto (the \"Stayed Avoidance Actions\") shall be stayed pending further order of the Court. At such time that the stay of the Stayed Avoidance Actions is lifted, the Court shall determine whether the Stayed Avoidance Actions shall be subject to the Mediation Procedures and set deadlines for Avoidance Defendants in such actions to respond to the Avoidance Complaints.\n\nii. the Avoidance Actions set forth on **Exhibit 3-B** attached hereto (the \"Partially Stayed Avoidance Actions\") shall be stayed pending further order of the Court solely as to any legal or factual issues concerning whether ACA Capital Group Ltd, Anton Development Limited, G Club International Limited, G Club Operations LLC, G Fashion, G Fashion Media Group Inc., GFNY Inc., Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd, Himalaya International Clearing Ltd, Leading Shine NY Ltd, Rule of Law Foundation III Inc., Rule of Law Society IV Inc., and Saraca Media Group Inc. were alter-egos of the Debtor and/or whether the property of such entities was property of the Debtor and/or of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate (collectively, the \"Stayed Issues\"). For the avoidance of doubt, Partially Stayed Avoidance Actions shall proceed to mediation to the extent provided by the Mediation Procedures (as defined herein) as to all issues that are not Stayed Issues, *provided, however*, Stayed Issues may also be mediated on a voluntary basis.\n\niii. Upon the filing of any new Avoidance Action, the Trustee may designate such action a Stayed Avoidance Action or a Partially Stayed Avoidance Action by filing a notice of such designation (a \"Stay Designation Notice\") in the relevant Avoidance Action. Any Avoidance Defendant wishing to challenge a Stay Designation Notice shall file a response to such notice in the relevant Avoidance Action within seven (7) days of appearing in same, to which the Trustee may reply within fourteen (14) days of the filing of such response. Any disputes over a Stay Designation Notice shall be determined by the Court.\n\nf. In the event that any Avoidance Defendant responds to an Avoidance Complaint by filing a motion pursuant to Civil Rule 12(b),, the Trustee shall have sixty (60) days to respond to such motion. , *provided, however*, if such a motion is filed while an Avoidance Action is subject to a stay or if an Avoidance Action is stayed while such a motion is pending, the Trustee shall have sixty (60) days to respond to such motion following the termination of the stay. An Avoidance Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to reply to any response by the Trustee to a motion filed pursuant to Civil Rule 12.\n\ng. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no initial pretrial conference pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7016 will be held prior to discovery in any Avoidance Action and, accordingly, the Summons issued by the Clerk of the Court and served by the Trustee will not include a date for a pretrial conference. To the extent that a party to an Avoidance Action believes that a pretrial conference is necessary to address scheduling or other issues, any party may request such a conference at any time by filing a request on the docket in the Avoidance Action.\n\nh. As soon as practicable following the Response Date, to the extent that an Avoidance Action is not stayed, the parties shall confer pursuant to Civil Rule 26(f) (the \"Initial Case Conference\") and, thereafter, the parties shall either file a joint proposed scheduling order governing discovery, summary judgment, and other pretrial proceedings, subject to Court approval. If the Court does not approve the joint proposed scheduling order, the Court shall schedule a pretrial conference to determine a scheduling order. If the parties do not agree on a joint proposed scheduling order, the parties shall request a pretrial conference to determine a scheduling order. If an Avoidance Action is stayed, the parties shall hold the Initial Case Conference as soon as practicable following the termination of the stay and thereafter shall otherwise comply with the foregoing procedure. Civil Rule 26 (to the extent incorporated by Bankruptcy Rule 7026), District of Connecticut Local Civil Rule 26, and District of Connecticut Local Bankruptcy Rule 7026-1 shall apply to the Avoidance Actions except to the extent that they are expressly modified by this Order or otherwise by order of the Court.\n\ni. Any party to an Avoidance Action may request that the Avoidance Action Procedures be modified as applied in such Avoidance Action for good cause shown. Such modification shall be requested by motion filed in the applicable Avoidance Action.\n\nj. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Avoidance Action Procedures shall be subject to the following procedures governing mediation proceedings (the \"Mediation Procedures\"):\") as to any Avoidance Defendant that was served with process prior to April 4, 2024: Upon the appearance of any Avoidance Defendant in an Avoidance Action prior to the expiration of such Avoidance Defendant's deadline to respond to the Trustee's Avoidance Complaint, the Trustee's claims against such Avoidance Defendant in such Avoidance Action shall automatically (and without further order) be referred (the \"Mediation Referral\") to non-binding mediation proceedings (as set forth herein, the \"Mediation Proceedings\"), *provided, however*, no Mediation Referral shall be deemed to have occurred prior to May 15, 2024. Upon a Mediation Referral, the Avoidance Action shall be stayed, as to such Avoidance Defendant only (including, without limitation, as to such Avoidance Defendant's obligation to respond to the Avoidance Complaint), pending the conclusion of Mediation Proceedings. If the Avoidance Defendant appears in the Avoidance Action after the Avoidance Defendant's time to respond to the Avoidance Complaint has expired, no Mediation Referral shall occur except upon a written stipulation by the Trustee and such Avoidance Defendant filed in the Avoidance Action or by order of the Court. For the avoidance of doubt, the staying of any Avoidance Action as to a particular Avoidance Defendant shall not stay the Avoidance Action as to any other Avoidance Defendant, nor shall the staying of a particular Avoidance Action as against an Avoidance Defendant stay any other claims by the Trustee against such Avoidance Defendant outside of such Avoidance Action (whether in other Avoidance Actions or otherwise). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no claims by the Trustee against the Avoidance Defendants set forth on the attached **Exhibit 4** shall be subject to a Mediation Referral except upon a stipulation between the Trustee and such Avoidance Defendant or by Order of the Court. To the extent that an Avoidance Defendant was not served with process prior to April 4, 2024, the Trustee may stipulate with such Avoidance Defendant to the application of the Mediation Procedures (with such stipulation to be made in writing and filed in the relevant Avoidance Action), or, following the service of such\n\nAvoidance Defendant, the Trustee may file a motion (with notice to the Avoidance Defendant) requesting that the Mediation Procedures apply to such Avoidance Defendant.\n\nk. United States Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi (\"Judge Tancredi\") shall oversee all Mediation Proceedings, *provided, however*, mediations shall be conducted by Judge Tancredi or by a mediator from an approved panel of mediators of Avoidance Actions (the \"Mediation Panel\") if the Trustee determines, in consultation with Judge Tancredi, that it would be beneficial to create such a panel. The members of any Mediation Panel shall be selected by the Trustee in consultation with Judge Tancredi, subject to the Court's approval of the appointment of each such mediator and rates of compensation applicable to same. Such approval shall be requested by the Trustee in the Main Case only by motion filed in accordance with all applicable rules and served on all Avoidance Defendants subject to the Mediation Procedures, and the appointment of a mediator to the Mediation Panel shall become effective upon approval by the Court.\n\nl. Within fourteen (14) days of any Mediation Referral, the Trustee and the relevant Avoidance Defendant shall jointly contact Judge Tancredi by letter submitted via Judge Tancredi's courtroom deputy briefly (and in a non-argumentative manner) describing the claims at issue and advising regarding their availability to participate in mediation in the following sixty (60) days as well as to whether the mediation session(s) should take place in person or via videoconference. Following receipt of such letter, Judge Tancredi shall assign the Avoidance Action to be mediated by himself or by a member of the Mediation Panel (the \"Assigned Mediator\") and shall direct that the mediation be conducted in person or via videoconference. Judge Tancredi may order that related Mediation Proceedings (including, where appropriate, where claims are asserted against multiple defendants in a single Avoidance Action) be consolidated.\n\nm. Alternatively, any Avoidance Defendant that believes that the claims against it should not be subject to mediation may, within fourteen (14) days of the Mediation Referral, file a motion with the Court setting forth good cause to exempt the claims against it from the Mediation Procedures, with notice to the Trustee and Judge Tancredi. No Mediation Proceedings as to such an Avoidance Defendant shall occur pending the Court's determination of such a motion. If the Court grants the motion, the Mediation Proceedings shall be deemed immediately terminated and the Avoidance Defendant shall respond to the Trustee's Avoidance Complaint within thirty (30) days of such termination. If the Court denies the motion, the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant shall contact Judge Tancredi by letter within fourteen (14) days of such denial pursuant to the procedure set forth in the foregoing paragraph l to obtain an Assigned Mediator.\n\nn. Upon notification of their assignment, the Assigned Mediator shall have an opportunity to determine whether they have any conflicts with respect to the Avoidance DefendantAction subject to mediation and, in the event of a conflict, mayshall abstain from acting in the particular mediation unless such conflict is disclosed to and expressly waived by the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant. If the Assigned Mediator abstains, Judge Tancredi shall assign an alternative mediator from the Mediation Panel or shall assign himself to the mediation. If a party to Mediation Proceedings believes that a conflict of interest precludes the service of the Assigned Mediator, such party may seek the assignment of a different Assigned Mediator by letter submitted to Judge Tancredi via his courtroom deputy (with copies to the opposing party and the Assigned Mediator) or by motion filed with the Court, *provided, however*, such relief may only be sought within seven (7fourteen\n\n(14) days of a party's discovery of the basis for seeking such relief. To the extent that a conflict is disclosed by the Assigned Mediator or timely challenged by a party to a Mediation Proceeding, such Mediation Proceeding shall be suspended pending (a) selection by Judge Tancredi of an alternative mediator to serve as the Assigned Mediator, (b) waiver of the conflict, or (c) the denial of any request for reassignment.\n\no. Upon the assignment of the Assigned Mediator, the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant shall confer with the Assigned Mediator regarding a date for the initial mediation session. The Assigned Mediator shall schedule the mediation to occur within sixty (60) days of assignment*, provided, however*, upon the consent of the parties and the Assigned Mediator, the mediation session may be scheduled on a later date that is within the deadline to complete Mediation Proceedings set forth in ¶ (t) herein. If the mediation is to occur in person, the Assigned Mediator shall also select the location of the mediation, *provided, however*, that, unless otherwise agreed by the parties and the Assigned Mediator, any in-person mediation shall occur only within the District of Connecticut or the New York City metropolitan area at (i) the offices of Trustee's counsel, (ii) a facility of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut, or (iii) the offices of the Assigned Mediator. The Assigned Mediator shall provide at least twenty-one (21) days' written notice of the first date, time, and place of the mediation (the \"Mediation Notice\"), which Mediation Notice the Assigned Mediator shall cause to be filed in the relevant Avoidance Action.\n\np. Upon consent of the parties at least seven (7) days prior to any scheduled mediation session, the Assigned Mediator may (at their discretion) reschedule such mediation session. If the Trustee or the relevant Avoidance Defendant seeks to reschedule a mediation session absent the counter-party's or the Assigned Mediator's consent or within seven (7) days ofprior to the mediation session, such request shall be made by letter to Judge Tancredi via his courtroom deputy and the counter-party and/or Assigned Mediator shall submit any response to Judge Tancredi likewise by letter to his courtroom deputy. Judge Tancredi will then determine whether the mediation session shall be rescheduled and, if the mediation session was scheduled to occur in less than seven (7) days from the date of the request, whether the Assigned Mediator is entitled to compensation and which party(ies) shall be responsible for same.\n\nq. All proceedings and writings incident to Mediation Proceedings shall be considered privileged and confidential and subject to all protections of Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and shall not be reported or admitted as evidence for any reason except to prove that a party failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. No Assigned Mediator nor Judge Tancredi shall be called as a witness by any party except as set forth in this paragraph. No party shall attempt to compel the testimony of, or compel the production of documents from, the Assigned Mediator (including their agents, partners, or employees of their respective law firms or organizations) or Judge Tancredi, *provided, however*, subject to Court order, an Assigned Mediator may be called as a witness by any party and may be compelled to testify on a limited basis in proceedings where it is alleged that a party failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. Any documents provided to the Assigned Mediator by the parties shall be destroyed within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Mediator's Report unless the Assigned Mediator is otherwise ordered by the Court.\n\nr. The Assigned Mediator shall preside over any mediation sessions with full authority to determine the nature and order of the parties' presentations, and the rules of evidence shall not apply. The Assigned Mediator may implement additional procedures which are reasonable and practical under the circumstances. The Trustee and any Avoidance Defendant that is party to Mediation Proceedings may communicate *ex-parte*  with their Assigned Mediator(s) to the extent that their Assigned Mediator(s) deem appropriate. The Trustee and his counsel may communicate *ex-parte* with Judge Tancredi concerning the implementation of these Mediation Procedures, the selection of mediators to the Mediation Panel, the categorization of Avoidance Actions, and/or any recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi to the Court.\n\ns. The parties to any Mediation Proceedings shall participate in such proceedings as scheduled and presided over by the Assigned Mediator in good faith and with a view toward reaching a consensual resolution. Mediation sessions shall be attended (either in person or, where permitted, by videoconference) by a representative of the Defendant willwith full settlement authority (and if a Defendant is represented by counsel, their counsel) as well as by the Trustee and/or counsel for the Trustee (who must have settlement authority from the Trustee). Assigned Mediators may, in their discretion, request the parties to prepare mediation statements in advance of mediation; unless otherwise instructed by the Assigned Mediator, such mediation statements shall not be shared with the other party to the mediation. The Assigned Mediator may issue further instructions regarding the mediation statements to the parties.\n\nt. The Assigned Mediator, in the Mediation Notice or in a separate notice that need not be filed, may require the parties to provide to the Assigned Mediator any relevant papers and exhibits, statements of position, and/or settlement proposals. In the Assigned Mediator's discretion, upon notice (which need not be filed), the Assigned Mediator may adjourn a mediation or move a mediation to a different location within those locations authorized by the Mediation Procedures. The Assigned Mediator may also continue a mediation that has been commenced for additional sessions upon the request of the parties to the mediation or if the Assigned Mediator determines that a continuation is in the best interest of the parties, *provided, however*, no Mediation Proceedings shall continue for a period beyond one-hundred-eighty (180) days following the Mediation Referral unless the period to mediate is extended by order of this Court on the request of Judge Tancredi, which request and order shall be filed on the docket in the relevant Avoidance Action. In the event that additional mediation sessions are held beyond the initial mediation session, the Assigned Mediator may, in their discretion, permit that such sessions be held by videoconference.\n\nu. Unless otherwise agreed or ordered by Judge Tancredi or the Court, the fees and costs of the Assigned Mediator, if any (the \"Mediation Fee\"), shall be paid equally by the parties to any Mediation Proceedings with the Mediation Fee for the initial mediation session due at least seven (7) days prior to the date such session is scheduled. Upon a showing that the payment of such amounts constitutes a hardship (submitted in writing with notice to all counter-parties to any Mediation Proceedings), Judge Tancredi or the Court may modify the parties' responsibilities for the Mediation Fee, *provided, however*, such relief shall be sought at least fourteen (14) days before any such Mediation Fee is due to be paid. If such relief is requested from the Court, it shall be requested in writing filed in the relevant Avoidance Action(s), which may be filed under seal, *provided, however*, the Avoidance Defendant shall provide a copy of any such sealed filing to the Trustee. Any response by the Trustee to such a sealed filing may likewise be filed under seal with reciprocal notice to the relevant Avoidance Defendant. The Mediation Fee shall be determined using the rates approved by the Court in connection with the appointment of the members of the Mediation Panel.\n\nv. Within seven (7) days after the conclusion of the mediation, the Assigned Mediator shall file a report (the \"Mediator's Report\") in the relevant Avoidance Action indicating whether the parties to the Mediation Proceedings complied with the Mediation Procedures and whether the Mediation Proceedings resulted in a settlement. The Mediator's Report shall not address the substance of mediation discussions. or provide details of any settlement that might be reached. In addition, in the case of material noncompliance with the Mediation Procedures, an Assigned Mediator may file an interim report (an \"Interim Report\") in the relevant Avoidance Action advising the Court of such noncompliance. Where a Mediator's Report or an Interim Report indicates noncompliance with the Mediation Procedures, the Court may (without the filing of a motion by any party) schedule a hearing to consider the appropriateness of sanctions against the noncompliant party. Such sanctions may include, without limitation, assessing costs of the Mediation Proceedings and/or the opposing party's attorneys' fees against the noncompliant party. Additionally, in cases of willful, persistent, or egregious noncompliance, the Court may enter a default judgment or dismissal against the party that failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. Additionally, if any party to Mediation Proceedings is not attempting to schedule or resolve the mediation in good faith, an opposing party may file a motion for sanctions with the Court. Litigation with respect to the issuance of sanctions shall not delay the commencement of mediation. Failure to achieve settlement alone cannot constitute grounds for a finding of \"bad faith\" or the imposition of sanctions.\n\nw. If the Mediator's Report indicates that the Mediation Proceedings resulted in a settlement and the settlement requires approval of the Court, the Trustee shall file a motion requesting such approval within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the Mediator's Report. The Trustee may submit a motion seeking such approval under seal (with access limited to the Trustee, the relevant Avoidance Defendant, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, and the United States Trustee) to the extent the Trustee believes that public disclosure of the settlement terms would harm the estate and/or would implicate commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential information public disclosure of which would prejudice parties to the settlement. Where a motion is filed under seal, the Trustee shall file on the public docket a copy of the motion that redacts any commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential information.\n\nx. If a Mediator's Report does not indicate a full settlement of the claims between the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant, the deadline to respond to the Trustee's Avoidance Complaint shall be thirty (30) days from the filing of the Mediator's Report.\n\ny. Members of the Mediation Panel (if any) shall regularly consult with Judge Tancredi concerning the status of Mediation Proceedings to which they are assigned. In addition, to facilitate the mediation process and to minimize any burden on Judge Tancredi, the Trustee shall endeavor, in consultation with Judge Tancredi, to devise categories of Avoidance Action claims (whether by amounts of transfers, timing of transfers, alter egos at issue, or otherwise). Such categorization shall not have any binding effect on any Avoidance Defendants as relates to the merits of claims or defenses in an Avoidance Action. Judge Tancredi may submit reports to the Court regarding the progress of Mediation Proceedings and any recommendations of Judge Tancredi to promote the efficient administration of the Avoidance Actions. Such reports shall be issued in writing and filed on the docket in the Main Case. Without limitation, these recommendations may include that certain Avoidance Actions and/or certain categories of Avoidance Actions be stayed for a fixed period prior to commencing one-on-oneparticular Mediation Proceedings. During the period of such a stay or otherwise, in order to facilitate the exchange of information and to encourage productive negotiations between the Trustee and Avoidance Defendants, Judge Tancredi may schedule informational sessions and/or mediation sessions that include multiple Avoidance Defendants and/or certain categories of Avoidance Defendants. To the extent that Judge Tancredi recommends staying any Avoidance Actions and/or categories of Avoidance Actions, the Trustee (within seven (7) days of the issuance of such recommendations) shall cause notice of same to be filed in such actions. Upon a hearing, and any Avoidance Defendant impacted by such recommended stay may file a written response in its Avoidance Action(s) within seven (7) days of the filing of notice. Upon a hearing considering Judge Tancredi's recommendations and any timely written response but without need for the filing of a motion, the Court may enter further orders addressing any recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi, including, without limitation, the stay of any Avoidance Actions or categories of Avoidance Actions prior to one-on-one mediation.\n\nz. Notwithstanding anything in the Avoidance Action Procedures to the contrary, these Mediation Procedures may be modified by the Court upon the request of the Trustee or any other party in interest, or as otherwise ordered by the Court (including, without limitation, upon recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi), upon notice issueda motion filed in the Main Case only in accordance with any applicable rules, *provided, however*, the revised Mediation Procedures, upon approval, shall be filed in all Avoidance Actions.\n\n3. Within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order, the Trustee shall file the Avoidance\n\nAction Procedures Notice (in the revised form attached hereto as Exhibit 1) in all Avoidance\n\nActions pending as of the entry of this Order.\n\n4. The time periods set forth in this Order and the Avoidance Action Procedures shall\n\nbe calculated in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a).\n\n5. To the extent that information in an Avoidance Complaint (or its exhibits) may be subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, et al., this Order constitutes an order of a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing the disclosure of such information to any Avoidance Defendant and its counsel, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) and 12 C.F.R § 310.10(b). This Order also amends the Protective Order and the P.O. Addendum to permit the Trustee, to the extent provided in the Avoidance Action Procedures, to disclose to any Avoidance Defendant information in an Avoidance Complaint (filed against such defendant) that is designated as highly confidential under the Protective Order or the P.O. Addendum.\n\n6. Pursuant to District of Connecticut Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5(e), District of Connecticut Local Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9077-1, Bankruptcy Rule 9018, and section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, this constitutes an Order of the Court authorizing the sealed filing of Avoidance Complaints and of motions seeking approval of settlements to the extent permitted by the Mediation Procedures.\n\n7. The Court retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the implementation of this Order.\n\n8. This Order shall be effective immediately upon entry.\n\n### **EXHIBIT 1**\n\n**(Form Notice of Applicability of Avoidance Action Procedures)**\n\n#### **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                                                               | x                                                                  |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| In re:                                                                                                                    | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11                                               |\n| 1<br>HO WAN KWOK, et al.,                                                                                                 | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)                                  |\n| Debtors.                                                                                                                  | :<br>:<br>(Jointly Administered)<br>:                              |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11<br>TRUSTEE,<br>Plaintiff,<br>v. | x<br>:<br>:<br>:<br>:<br>Adv. Proceeding No. [<br>]<br>:<br>:<br>: |\n| [NAME OF DEFENDANT]                                                                                                       | :<br>:                                                             |\n| Defendant.<br>-----------------------------------------------------------                                                 | :<br>:<br>:<br>x                                                   |\n\n#### **NOTICE OF APPLICABILITY OF AVOIDANCE ACTION PROCEDURES**\n\nPLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the Amended Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings entered by the Bankruptcy Court in the above-captioned chapter 11 case [ECF No. \\_\\_\\_] appended hereto as **Exhibit A**, is hereby made applicable to and governs this adversary proceeding.\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nDated: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ \\_\\_, 2024 New Haven, Connecticut\n\nBy: *\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_*\n\nPatrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n*and*\n\nNicholas A. Bassett *(*admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n*and*\n\nAvram E. Luft *(*admitted *pro hac vice*) Douglass Barron (admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6079 aviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n*Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n### **EXHIBIT 2**\n\n**(Caption Applicable to Omnibus Filings)**\n\n#### **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>In re:<br>1<br>HO WAN KWOK, et al.,<br>Debtors.      | x<br>:<br>Chapter 11<br>:<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)<br>:<br>:<br>(Jointly Administered)<br>:<br>:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11<br>TRUSTEE,<br>Plaintiff, | x<br>Adv. Proc. Nos. 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>:<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>:<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>:<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>:<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>:<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |\n| v.<br>AVOIDANCE DEFENDANTS                                                                                          | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>:<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>:<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>:<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>:<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |\n| Defendants.<br>-----------------------------------------------------------                                          | :<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>:<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>x<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, and 24-XXXX |\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n### **EXHIBIT 3-A**\n\n**(Avoidance Actions Subject to Stay)**\n\n|                         |                                        |           | Formatted       |  |\n|-------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------|-----------------|--|\n|                         |                                        |           | Formatted       |  |\n|                         |                                        |           | Formatted       |  |\n|                         |                                        |           | Formatted       |  |\n|                         |                                        |           |                 |  |\n|                         |                                        |           | Formatted Table |  |\n| ADV. PROC. NO.          | FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT                  |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05008 | Boardwalk Motor Imports LLC            |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05009 | Mercantile Bank International          |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05012 | Ogier                                  |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05014 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP    |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05017 | Post Oak Motor Cars LLC                |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05020 | Slaughter Law Group PC                 |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05022 | FAM United LLC                         |           |                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05026 | Yieldesta LP                           |           | Formatted       |  |\n|                         | Great Bowery Inc dba Camilla Lowther   |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05029 | Management                             |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05030 | Vision Knight Capital (China) Fund     |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05032 | Hugga LLC                              |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05037 | Triple2 Digital                        |           | Formatted Table |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05038 | D4.Zero                                |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05041 | CFG Global Limited                     | Formatted |                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05043 | Loro Piana                             |           |                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05045 | The Quinlan Law Firm LLC               |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05046 | Janco SRL                              |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05050 | Oro Mont Alpi SRL                      |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05051 | Mindy Wechsler                         |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05052 | MF19 Inc                               |           | Formatted Table |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05056 | FFP (BVI) Limited                      |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05068 | Caribe Condado LLC                     |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05080 | Reinhard Plank SRL                     |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05083 | UK Import Services Limited             |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05084 | Tavares Cutting Inc                    |           |                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05087 | Mosaicon Shoes SRL                     |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05088 | Tokyoseiki Co LTD                      |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05089 | Pellettieri Di Parma SRL               |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05091 | Shalom B LLC dba Asher Fabric Concepts |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05094 | Solazzo Calzature SRL                  |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05095 | SOD Stone Offroad Design GmbH          |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05096 | 1245 Factory Place LLC                 |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05097 | Liapull S.R.L.                         |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05098 | Shing Seung Ankerite Engineering Ltd   |           |                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05099 | American Arbitration Association       |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05104 | Ice24 SRO                              |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05106 | REACH MFG                              |           | Formatted       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05111 | DNM Beauty Distribution                |           | Formatted       |  |\n|                         |                                        |           | Formatted       |  |\n|                         |                                        |           | Formatted       |  |\n|                         |                                        |           |                 |  |\n\n**Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted Table** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted Table** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted Table** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ...\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05113 | 1322089 BC Ltd                                                 |  |\n|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05116 | Hilton Management LLC                                          |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05118 | J Tan Jewelry Design Inc                                       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05121 | Shaylen Music LLC                                              |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05123 | Bestview1 Pty Ltd                                              |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05124 | Legends OWO LLC                                                |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05127 | Waycap SPA                                                     |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05129 | Fay Ye                                                         |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05131 | Lawrence River                                                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05136 | ASAP SRL                                                       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05137 | Bellerive Attorneys at Law                                     |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05139 | Houston Litstar LLC                                            |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05140 | Quinones Law PLLC                                              |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05142 | Immobiliara Barbara 2000 SRL                                   |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05143 | Dream Projects LLC                                             |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05146 | Fortnum Information Security Limited                           |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05148 | Galaxy Ltd                                                     |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05150 | Jialin Qin                                                     |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05151 | Li Sho Yo                                                      |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05153 | Ming Ni                                                        |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05155 | Hayashi Meiou                                                  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05156 | 12476517 Canada Society                                        |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05157 | DP Textile & Apparel Inc                                       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05160 | LA International Foundation                                    |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05164 | National Sweepstakes Company LLC                               |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05165 | Oxford Visionary Ltd                                           |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05166 | Chris Lee                                                      |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05169 | D&D Solutions LLC                                              |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05170 | The Gertz File Investigative Reporting Project Inc             |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05173 | Wenhua Gong                                                    |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05174 | SGB Packaging                                                  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05176 | Luminescence Co Ltd                                            |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05177 | Xiaobo He                                                      |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05180 | Richmond Strategic Advisor                                     |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05183 | Reverence Capital Partners Opportunities Fund I<br>(Cayman) LP |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05191 | Deng Qian                                                      |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05193 | Fiesta Investments Ltd                                         |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05195 | Shujuan Milne                                                  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05197 | Great Lakes Drone Company                                      |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05198 | G-Service LLC                                                  |  |\n\n| Formatted |  |\n|-----------|--|\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n|           |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n|           |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n| Formatted |  |\n\n**Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted Table** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ...\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05205 | Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC                   |\n|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05210 | Jiayao Gan                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05212 | Michael Li and Co                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05213 | GPS McQuhae LLP                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05215 | Bradley Staple, dba Staples Building Solutions |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05217 | Haisong Peng                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05218 | Hou Yuan Chan                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05224 | OSC Orbit Services Company LLC                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05227 | Tao Zheng                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05230 | Cayuse Government Services                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05231 | 9 East 40th Street                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05232 | Daihao Zhou                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05233 | Brune Law PC                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05234 | Lyzon Enterprises Corporation                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05235 | Halley Chen CPA Professional Corporation       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05236 | Feng Yi                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05237 | Qiang Hu                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05239 | Jianhai Jiao                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05240 | Fengjie Ma                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05241 | MZC Financial Inc                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05242 | Cotton Craft Textiles Intl Trading             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05243 | Ihotry Ltd                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05244 | Quick-Equip LLC                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05245 | RM Auctions Deutschland GmbH, et al.           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05246 | WA & HF LLC                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Curiosity Corp, et al.                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05250 | Scarabaeus Wealth Management AG                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05251 | LLC Stz Fund No. 1                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05252 | Gettr USA Inc                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05253 | Ivy Capital Advisor Limited                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05254 | NAV Consulting Inc                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05255 | Ziba Limited                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05256 | New Mulberry PTE Ltd                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05257 | Mishcon de Reya LLP                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05258 | Hogan Lovells International LLP                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05259 | Top Target General Trading LLC                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05260 | GCP Investment Advisors SL                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05261 | Starling                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05262 | Red Team Partners                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05264 | Smaragdos Mamzeris                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05265 | Siu Ming Je                                    |\n\n| Formatted       |  |\n|-----------------|--|\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted Table |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n|                 |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted Table |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n|                 |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n| Formatted       |  |\n\n**Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ...\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05266 | Gong Jianfen                               |  |\n|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05267 | Khaled Ashafy                              |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05268 | Pure Global Group Limited                  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc, et al. |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05272 | Hayman Hong Kong Opportunities             |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05274 | Kin Ming Je                                |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Lamp Capital LLC, et al.                   |  |\n\n| None | Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: |\n|------|-------------------------------------------------------|\n|      | Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single    |\n| None | Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: |\n|      | Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single    |\n| None | Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: |\n|      | Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single    |\n| None | Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: |\n|      | Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single    |\n| None | Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: |\n|      | Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single    |\n| None | Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: |\n|      | Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single    |\n| None | Formatted: Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: |\n|      | Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single    |\n\n### **EXHIBIT 3-B**\n\n**(Avoidance Actions Subject to Partial Stay)**\n\n| ADV. PROC. NO.          | FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT                            |  |\n|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05006 | AWS (Amazon Web Services)                        |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05007 | Blueberry Builders                               |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05011 | E.L.J.M. Consulting LLC                          |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05016 | Imperius International Trad Co Ltd               |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05019 | Mary Fashion SPA                                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05021 | Bannon Strategic Advisors Inc                    |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05023 | Studio Cataldi Group SRL                         |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05024 | TT Resources 1 Pty Ltd                           |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05028 | Yuqiang Qin & Yunfu Jiang                        |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05044 | Teris                                            |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05054 | Style Eyes Inc. d/b/a Ginger Finds               |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05056 | FFP (BVI) Limited                                |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Amazon Inc                                       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05058 | Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield                    |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05059 | Federal Express                                  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05060 | Apple Inc                                        |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05065 | A.Z. Bigiotterie S.A.S. DI Zanutto Gabriele & C. |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05069 | B&H Photo                                        |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05075 | Marcella Monica Falciani                         |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05077 | American Express                                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05081 | Victor-Oasis Consultancy Limited                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05090 | Swans Team Design Inc                            |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05093 | 2 B Packing LLC                                  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05102 | Ocorian Consulting Ltd                           |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05105 | N87 Inc                                          |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05109 | Moran Yacht Management Inc                       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05115 | Cloudflare                                       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05122 | Indium Software Inc                              |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05125 | Rilievi Group SRL                                |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05133 | Beile Li                                         |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05134 | V.X. Cerda & Associates PA                       |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05135 | Liberty Jet Management                           |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05145 | Manhattan Motorcars Inc                          |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05152 | Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP             |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05154 | Kamel Debeche                                    |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05159 | Gold Leaf Consulting Limited                     |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05161 | Mandelli USA Inc                                 |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05163 | Harcus Parker Limited                            |  |\n\n| Formatted              |      |\n|------------------------|------|\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted Table        |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted Table        |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted Table        |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n|                        |      |\n|                        |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted              |      |\n| Formatted<br>Formatted | <br> |\n\n**Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted Table** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ...\n\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05172 |                                      | Federal Corporation (Japan)    |  |  |\n|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--|--|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05175 |                         |                                      | Lau Lai Chun Annie             |  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05178 |                         |                                      | Super Star Project Limited     |  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05179 |                         |                                      | Rising Sun Capital Ltd         |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05188 |                                      | Berkeley Rowe Ltd              |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05188 |                                      | Weddle Law PLLC                |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05189 |                                      | TD Avenue (The Diamond Avenue) |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05199 |                                      | Lawall & Mitchell LLC          |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05203 |                                      | Oasis Tech Limited             |  |  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05204 |                         | G4S Security Systems (Hong Kong) Ltd |                                |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05206 |                                      | Hao Haidong                    |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05221 |                                      | Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC    |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05223 |                                      | G-Translators Pty Ltd          |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05225 |                                      | Cirrus Design Corporation      |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05226 |                                      | ACASS Canada Ltd               |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05238 | Qiang Guo                            |                                |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Tut Co Limited                       |                                |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | BSA Strategic Fund I, et al.         |                                |  |  |\n|                         | Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Weihua Li, et al.                    |                                |  |  |\n|                         |                         |                                      |                                |  |  |\n\n**Formatted:** Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: None **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted Table Formatted:** Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: None **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted Table Formatted:** Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: None **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted:** Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: None **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted:** Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: None **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted:** Font: 11 pt, Font color: Black, Ligatures: None **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted Table Formatted** ... **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted Table Formatted** ... **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted Table Formatted:** Font: 11 pt **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted** ... **Formatted:** Font: 11 pt **Formatted** ... **Formatted** ... **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted** ... **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted** ... **Formatted:** Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single **Formatted:** Font: +Body (Aptos), 11 pt\n\n### **EXHIBIT 4**\n\n**(List of Avoidance Defendants Not Automatically Subject to Mediation Referral)**\n\n- 1. ACA Capital Limited\n- 2. Anton Development Limited\n- 3. Bannon Strategic Advisors, Inc.\n- 4. Barnett, Scott\n- 5. Berkeley Rowe Limited\n- 6. BSA Strategic Fund\n- 7. BSA Strategic Fund I\n- 8. Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC\n- 9. China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd.\n- 10. Debeche, Kamel\n- 11. DiBattista, Anthony\n- 12. Enriquez, Bernardo\n- 13. Federal Corporation\n- 14. Fiesta Investment Ltd. f/k/a Fiesta Property Developments Ltd.\n- 15. G Club Holdco I LLC\n- 16. G Club International Limited\n- 17. G Club Operations LLC\n- 18. G Club Three\n- 19. G Fashion\n- 20. G Fashion International Limited\n- 21. G Fashion Media Group Inc.\n- 22. Gettr USA, Inc.\n- 23. GF Italy, LLC\n- 24. GFNY Inc.\n- 25. Gold Leaf Consulting Limited\n- 26. Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC\n- 27. Golden Spring (New York) Limited\n- 28. Greenwich Land LLC\n- 29. GS Security Solutions Inc.\n- 30. G-Service LLC\n- 31. G-Translators Pty Ltd\n- 32. Guo, Mei\n- 33. Guo, Qiang\n- 34. Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC\n- 35. HAA Group Pty Ltd\n- 36. Hadjicharalambous, Alex\n- 37. Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd\n- 38. Hamilton Investment Management Ltd\n- 39. Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC\n- 40. Han, Chunguang\n- 41. Harcus Parker Limited\n- 42. HCHK Property Management Inc.\n- 43. HCHK Technologies Inc.\n\n45. Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd. 46. Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC 47. Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd. 48. Himalaya International Clearing Ltd. 49. Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd 50. Himalaya International Reserves Ltd 51. Himalaya New World Inc. 52. Himalaya New York Rock 53. Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC 54. Himalaya UK Club 55. Himalaya Worldwide LS 56. HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd. 57. Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited 58. Hudson Diamond NY LLC 59. Je, Kin Ming 60. Krasner, Max 61. Lamp Capital LLC 62. Lawall & Mitchell, LLC 63. Leading Shine NY Limited 64. Lee, Chris 65. Lexington Property and Staffing Inc. 66. Miller, Jason 67. Mitchell, Aaron 68. MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc. 69. Mountains of Spices Inc. 70. Ngok, Hing Chi 71. O.S.C. Orbit II Service Company LLC 72. Omicron Nutraceutical LLC 73. OSC Orbit Service Company LLC 74. Oxford Visionary Ltd. 75. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 76. Rising Sun Capital Ltd. 77. Rong, Sin Ting 78. Rosy Acme Ventures Limited 79. Rule of Law III Foundation Inc. 80. Rule of Law Society IV Inc. 81. Saraca Media Group, Inc. 82. Taurus Fund LLC 83. The Francis Firm PLLC 84. Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP 85. UK Himalaya Ltd. 86. V.X. Cerda & Associates P.A.\n\n44. Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.\n\n87. Wang, Yanping\n\n- 88. Warroom Broadcasting & Media Communications LLC\n- 89. Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C.\n\n90. Zhang, Yongbing\n\n- 91. ZYB & Associates, LLC, d/b/a Law Offices of Yongbing Zhang\n- 91.92. Any potential Avoidance Defendant that is subject to a stipulated tolling order entered by the Court.\n\n## **EXHIBIT B**\n\n*Weddle Law Objections and Proposed Revisions to April 10th Version of Proposed Amended Procedures Order*\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| --------------------------------------------------------------- | x                                   |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|\n| In re:                                                          | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11                |\n| HO WAN KWOK, et al.,                                            | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)   |\n| Debtors.1                                                       | :<br>:<br>Jointly Administered<br>: |\n| --------------------------------------------------------------- | x                                   |\n\n## **[REVISED PROPOSED] AMENDED ORDER APPROVING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO AVOIDANCE CLAIM ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS**\n\nUpon the motion (the \"Motion\")2 of Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") appointed in the chapter 11 case of Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\"), for the entry of an order (this \"Order\"), pursuant to sections 105(a) and 363 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the \"Bankruptcy Code\"), Rules 7016, 7026, and 9006 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the \"Bankruptcy Rules\"), and Rule 7016-1 of the District of Connecticut Local Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the \"Local Bankruptcy Rules\"), to modify the Court's *Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* [ECF No. 2578] (the \"Avoidance Procedures Order\") and thereby modifying the Avoidance Action Procedures to provide for the inclusion of certain procedures governing mediation of Avoidance Actions; and this Court having jurisdiction to consider the Motion and the relief requested therein in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the *Standing Order of Reference* from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut; and consideration of the Motion and the relief\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<sup>2</sup> Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Order have the meanings ascribed to them in the Motion.\n\nrequested therein being a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b); and venue being proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and the Court having found that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interest of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate, its creditors, and all parties in interest; and due and sufficient notice of the Motion having been given under the particular circumstances; and it appearing that no other or further notice need be given; and upon all of the proceedings had before this Court, including a hearing held April 23, 2024; and any objections to the relief requested herein having been withdrawn or overruled on the merits; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:\n\n1. The Motion is granted as set forth herein.\n\n2. The Court hereby orders that the following amended Avoidance Action Procedures shall govern the Avoidance Actions:\n\na. The Avoidance Action Procedures shall apply to any adversary proceedings commenced by the Trustee on or after February 1, 2024, in which the Trustee asserts claims solely under sections 544, 547, 548, 549, and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code (the \"Avoidance Actions\").\n\nb. Upon filing a complaint commencing any Avoidance Action (an \"Avoidance Complaint\"), the Trustee shall file a Notice of Applicability of Avoidance Action Procedures in a form substantially similar to that attached hereto as **Exhibit 1** (the \"Avoidance Action Procedures Notice\"). The Trustee shall serve a copy of the Avoidance Action Procedures Notice on each defendant in an Avoidance Action (an \"Avoidance Defendant\") together with the Summons and Avoidance Complaint pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7004.\n\nc. Motions affecting multiple Avoidance Actions shall be filed in each applicable Avoidance Action and shall use a caption substantially in the form attached hereto as **Exhibit 2**.\n\nd. To the extent that an Avoidance Complaint (including exhibits) contains information that is designated confidential or highly confidential pursuant to the Protective Order [Main Case ECF No. 923] (the \"Protective Order\") and the Stipulated Addendum to Protective Order [Main Case ECF No. 2460] (the \"P.O. Addendum\"), the Trustee may file the Avoidance Complaint under seal (a \"Sealed Avoidance Complaint\"), provided, however, the Trustee shall file unsealed a copy of the Avoidance Complaint that redacts any information that is designated confidential or highly confidential (a \"Redacted Avoidance Complaint\"). Service of a Redacted Avoidance Complaint shall constitute sufficient service of a complaint as required by Bankruptcy Rule 7004. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Protective Order and the P.O. Addendum, upon any Avoidance Defendant and its counsel each executing copies of Exhibit A to the Protective Order and, if applicable, Exhibit A to the P.O. Addendum, the Trustee shallmay provide a copy of the unredacted Avoidance Complaint to such Avoidance Defendant.\n\ne. An Avoidance Defendant's time to respond to any Avoidance Complaint (the \"Response Date\") shall be sixty (60) days from the date that service is effected on such Avoidance Defendant, *provided, however*, that, without further order of the Court, the Trustee and any Avoidance Defendant may stipulate to further extend the defendant's Response Date up to ninety (90) additional days. Any such stipulation shall be made in writing and filed on the docket in the applicable adversary proceeding. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary:\n\ni. the Avoidance Actions set forth on **Exhibit 3-A** attached hereto (the \"Stayed Avoidance Actions\") shall be stayed pending further order of the Court. At such time that the stay of the Stayed Avoidance Actions is lifted, the Court shall determine whether the Stayed Avoidance Actions shall be subject to the Mediation Procedures and set deadlines for Avoidance Defendants in such actions to respond to the Avoidance Complaints.\n\nii. the Avoidance Actions set forth on **Exhibit 3-B** attached hereto (the \"Partially Stayed Avoidance Actions\") shall be stayed pending further order of the Court solely as to any legal or factual issues concerning whether ACA Capital Group Ltd, Anton Development Limited, G Club International Limited, G Club Operations LLC, G Fashion, G Fashion Media Group Inc., GFNY Inc., Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd, Himalaya International Clearing Ltd, Leading Shine NY Ltd, Rule of Law Foundation III Inc., Rule of Law Society IV Inc., and Saraca Media Group Inc. were alter-egos of the Debtor and/or whether the property of such entities was property of the Debtor and/or of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate (collectively, the \"Stayed Issues\"), *provided, however*, that the parties may litigate and the Court shall decide a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12, made applicable here by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012, regardless of any stay of issues asserted in such motion to dismiss.. For the avoidance of doubt, Partially Stayed Avoidance Actions shall proceed to mediation to the extent provided by the Mediation Procedures (as defined herein) as to all issues that are not Stayed Issues, *provided, however*, Stayed Issues may also be mediated on a voluntary basis. [**NTD**: this is unclear. What parts of the actions are stayed and not stayed? Is it transferor based? Is it Bankruptcy Code section based? It needs to be broken out as what parts of the applicable adversary proceeding are subject to this dual track, stay/not stayed action.]\n\niii. Upon the filing of any new Avoidance Action, the Trustee may designate such action a Stayed Avoidance Action or a Partially Stayed Avoidance Action by filing a notice of such designation (a \"Stay Designation Notice\") in the relevant Avoidance Action. Any Avoidance Defendant wishing to challenge a Stay Designation Notice shall file a response to such notice in the relevant Avoidance Action within seven (7) days of appearing in same, to which the Trustee may reply within fourteen (14) days of the filing of such response. Any disputes over a Stay Designation Notice shall be determined by the Court, after notice and a hearing.\n\nf. In the event that any Avoidance Defendant responds to an Avoidance Complaint by filing a motion pursuant to Federal Civil Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), the Trustee shall have sixty (60) days to respond to such motion. In the event the Trustee responds to such motion, the Avoidance Action Defendant shall have forty-five (45) days to file a reply to the Trustee's opposition.\n\ng. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no initial pretrial conference pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7016 will be held prior to discovery in any Avoidance Action and, accordingly, the Summons issued by the Clerk of the Court and served by the Trustee will not include a date for a pretrial conference. To the extent that a party to an Avoidance Action believes that a pretrial conference is necessary to address scheduling or other issues, any party may request such a conference at any time by filing a request on the docket in the Avoidance Action.\n\nh. As soon as practicable following the Response Date, the parties shall confer pursuant to Civil Rule 26(f) (the \"Initial Case Conference\") and, thereafter, the parties shall either file a joint proposed scheduling order governing discovery, summary judgment, and other pretrial proceedings, subject to Court approval. If the Court does not approve the joint proposed scheduling order, the Court shall schedule a pretrial conference to determine a scheduling order. If the parties do not agree on a joint proposed scheduling order, the parties shall request a pretrial conference to determine a scheduling order. No party shall propound discovery in an Avoidance Action before a scheduling order is entered.\n\ni. Any party to an Avoidance Action may request that the Avoidance Action Procedures be modified as applied in such Avoidance Action for good cause shown. Such modification shall be requested by motion filed in the applicable Avoidance Action.\n\nj. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Avoidance Action Procedures shall be subject to the following procedures governing mediation proceedings (the \"Mediation Procedures\"): *provided however*, that the Mediation Procedures shall only apply as to defendants domiciled in the United States, and any non-United States domiciled defendants shall not be subject to the Mediation Procedures unless they agree voluntarily; *provided further*, that voluntary participation in mediation in accordance with the Mediation Procedures shall not constitute submission to jurisdiction or a waiver of any claim or defense, including based on sufficiency of process, venue and jurisdiction: Upon the appearance of any Avoidance Defendant in an Avoidance Action prior to the expiration of such Avoidance Defendant's deadline to respond to the Trustee's Avoidance Complaint, the Trustee's claims against such Avoidance Defendant in such Avoidance Action shall automatically (and without further order) be referred (the \"Mediation Referral\") to nonbinding mediation proceedings (as set forth herein, the \"Mediation Proceedings\"), *provided, however*, no Mediation Referral shall be deemed to have occurred prior to May 15, 2024. Upon a Mediation Referral, the Avoidance Action shall be stayed, as to such Avoidance Defendant only, provided however that such stay shall not apply to the Trustee's obligation to respond any motion pursuant to Civil Rule 12 and the Avoidance Action Defendant(s) right to file a reply to any opposition file by the Trustee (including, without limitation, as to such Avoidance Defendant's obligation to respond to the Avoidance Complaint), pending the conclusion of Mediation Proceedings. [**NTD**: cross-reference to the partially stayed avoidance actions and not stayed avoidance actions for the dual track litigation/mediation] If the Avoidance Defendant appears in the Avoidance Action after the Avoidance Defendant's time to respond to the Avoidance Complaint has expired, no Mediation Referral shall occur except upon a written stipulation by the Trustee and such Avoidance Defendant filed in the Avoidance Action or by order of the Court. For the avoidance of doubt, the staying of any Avoidance Action as to a particular Avoidance Defendant shall not stay the Avoidance Action as to any other Avoidance Defendant, nor shall the staying of a particular Avoidance Action as against an Avoidance Defendant stay any other claims by the Trustee against such Avoidance Defendant outside of such Avoidance Action (whether in other Avoidance Actions or otherwise). Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no claims by the Trustee against the Avoidance Defendants set forth on the attached **Exhibit 4** shall be subject to a Mediation Referral except upon a stipulation between the Trustee and such Avoidance Defendant or by Order of the Court.\n\nk. United States Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi (\"Judge Tancredi\") shall oversee all Mediation Proceedings, *provided, however*, mediations shall be conducted by Judge Tancredi or by a mediator from an approved panel of mediators of Avoidance Actions (the \"Mediation Panel\") if Judge Trancredithe Trustee determines, in consultation with the Trustee and the Avoidance Action Defendants Judge Tancredi, that it would be beneficial to create such a panel. The members of any Mediation Panel shall be selected by Judge Tancredi, who may take recommendations from the Trustee and the Avoidance Action Defendants the Trustee in consultation with Judge Tancredi, subject to the Court's approval of the appointment of each such mediator and rates of compensation applicable to same. Such approval shall be requested by the Trustee in the Main Case only by way of motion, and after notice and hearing, consistent with Bankruptcy Rules 2002 and 9013 and applicable Local Bankruptcy Rules and served on all Avoidance Defendants only, and the appointment of a mediator to the Mediation Panel shall become effective upon approval by the Court. Any request for the appointment of a mediator to the Mediation Panel will be accompanied by a sworn declaration from the mediator that the mediator that the mediator does not hold or represent any party with an interest adverse to the estate or any Avoidance Defendant and is otherwise a \"disinterested person\" within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 101(14). The proposed mediator's declaration shall also disclose all connections with the Trustee and his counsel.\n\nl. Within fourteen (14) days of any Mediation Referral, the Trustee and the relevant Avoidance Defendant shall jointly contact Judge Tancredi by letter submitted via Judge Tancredi's courtroom deputy, whose contact information for purposes of submitting the letter and scheduling the mediation shall be provided to the Trustee and relevant Avoidance Action defendant following the Mediation Referral, briefly (and in a nonargumentative manner) describing the claims at issue (and likely counterclaims and defenses) and advising regarding their availability to participate in mediation in the following sixty (60) days as well as to whether the mediation session(s) should take place in person or via videoconference. Following receipt of such letter, Judge Tancredi shall assign the Avoidance Action to be mediated by himself or by a member of the Mediation Panel (the \"Assigned Mediator\") and shall direct that the mediation be conducted in person or via videoconference. Judge Tancredi may order that related Mediation Proceedings (including, where appropriate, where claims are asserted against multiple defendants in a single Avoidance Action) be consolidated.\n\nm. Alternatively, any Avoidance Defendant that believes that the claims against it should not be subject to mediation may, within fourteen (14) days of the Mediation Referral, file a motion opt-out of the mediation by filing a notice with the Court, setting forth good cause to exempt the claims against it from the Mediation Procedures, with notice to the Trustee and Judge Tancredi that it does not wish to participate in the mediation. If a defendant wishes to participate in mediation at a later time, the parties may notify Judge Tancredi and the Court that they wish to proceed to mediation. No Mediation Proceedings as to such an Avoidance Defendant shall occur pending the Court's determination of such a motion. If the Court grants the motion, the Mediation Proceedings shall be deemed immediately terminated and the Avoidance Defendant shall respond to the Trustee's Avoidance Complaint within thirty (30) days of such termination. If the Court denies the motion, the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant shall contact Judge Tancredi by letter within fourteen (14) days of such denial pursuant to the procedure set forth in the foregoing paragraph l to obtain an Assigned Mediator.\n\nn. Upon notification of their assignment, the Assigned Mediator shall have an opportunity to determine whether they have any conflicts with the Avoidance Defendant and, in the event of a conflict, shall may abstain from acting in the particular mediation, provided however that such abstention may be waived by the Avoidance Action Defendant upon notice to the Court. If the Assigned Mediator abstains, Judge Tancredi shall assign an alternative mediator from the Mediation Panel or shall assign himself to the mediation. If a party to Mediation Proceedings believes that a conflict of interest precludes the service of the Assigned Mediator, such party may seek the assignment of a different Assigned Mediator by letter submitted to Judge Tancredi via his courtroom deputy (with copies to the opposing party and the Assigned Mediator) or by motion filed with the Court, *provided, however*, such relief may only be sought within seven (7) days of a party's discovery of the basis for seeking such relief.\n\no. Upon the assignment of the Assigned Mediator, the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant shall confer with the Assigned Mediator regarding a date for the initial mediation session. The Assigned Mediator shall schedule the mediation to occur within sixty (60) days of assignment*, provided, however*, upon the consent of the parties and the Assigned Mediator, the mediation session may be scheduled on a later date that is within the deadline to complete Mediation Proceedings set forth in ¶ (t) herein. If the mediation is to occur in person, the Assigned Mediator shall also select the location of the mediation, *provided, however*, that, unless otherwise agreed by the parties and the Assigned Mediator, any in-person mediation shall occur only within the District of Connecticut or the New York City metropolitan area at (i) the offices of Trustee's counsel, (ii) a facility of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut, or (iii) the offices of the Assigned Mediator. The Assigned Mediator shall provide at least twenty-one (21) days' written notice of the first date, time, and place of the mediation (the \"Mediation Notice\"), which Mediation Notice the Assigned Mediator shall cause to be filed in the relevant Avoidance Action.\n\np. Upon consent of the parties at least seven (7) days prior to any scheduled mediation session, the Assigned Mediator may (at their discretion) reschedule such mediation session. If the Trustee or the relevant Avoidance Defendant seeks to reschedule a mediation session absent the counter-party's or the Assigned Mediator's consent or within seven (7) days of the mediation session, such request shall be made by letter to Judge Tancredi via his courtroom deputy and the counter-party and/or Assigned Mediator shall submit any response to Judge Tancredi likewise by letter to his courtroom deputy. Judge Tancredi will then determine whether the mediation session shall be rescheduled and, if the mediation session was scheduled to occur in less than seven (7) days from the date of the request, whether the Assigned Mediator is entitled to compensation and which party(ies) shall be responsible for same.\n\nq. All proceedings and writings incident to Mediation Proceedings shall be considered privileged and confidential and subject to all protections of Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and shall not be reported or admitted as evidence for any reason except to prove that a party failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. No Assigned Mediator nor Judge Tancredi shall be called as a witness by any party except as set forth in this paragraph. No party shall attempt to compel the testimony of, or compel the production of documents (except to the extent that applicable law permits such testimony or documents to be produced and/or that such production would have been required through normal discovery protocols pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) from, the Assigned Mediator (including their agents, partners, or employees of their respective law firms or organizations) or Judge Tancredi., *provided, however*, subject to Court order, an Assigned Mediator may be called as a witness by any party and may be compelled to testify on a limited basis in proceedings where it is alleged that a party failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. Any documents provided to the Assigned Mediator by the parties shall be destroyed within thirty (30) days after the filing of the Mediator's Report unless the Assigned Mediator is otherwise ordered by the Court.\n\nr. The Assigned Mediator shall preside over any mediation sessions with full authority to determine the nature and order of the parties' presentations, and the rules of evidence shall not apply. The Assigned Mediator may implement additional procedures which are reasonable and practical under the circumstances. The Trustee and any Avoidance Defendant that is party to Mediation Proceedings may communicate *ex-parte*  with their Assigned Mediator(s) to the extent that their Assigned Mediator(s) deem appropriate. The Trustee and his counsel may communicate *ex-parte* with Judge Tancredi concerning the implementation of these Mediation Procedures, the selection of mediators to the Mediation Panel, the categorization of Avoidance Actions, and/or any recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi to the Court.\n\ns. The parties to any Mediation Proceedings shall participate in such proceedings as scheduled and presided over by the Assigned Mediator in good faith and with a view toward reaching a consensual resolution. Mediation sessions shall be attended (either in person or, where permitted, by videoconference) by a representative of the Defendant withll full settlement authority (and if a Defendant is represented by counsel, their counsel) as well as by the Trustee and/or counsel for the Trustee (who must have settlement authority from the Trustee). Assigned Mediators may, in their discretion, request the parties to prepare mediation statements in advance of mediation; unless otherwise instructed by the Assigned Mediator, such mediation statements shall not be shared with the other party to the mediation. The Assigned Mediator may issue further instructions regarding the mediation statements to the parties.\n\nt. The Assigned Mediator, in the Mediation Notice or in a separate notice that need not be filed, may require the parties to provide to the Assigned Mediator any relevant papers and exhibits, statements of position, and/or settlement proposals. In the Assigned Mediator's discretion, upon notice (which need not be filed on the Court's docket), the Assigned Mediator may adjourn a mediation or move a mediation to a different location within those locations authorized by the Mediation Procedures. The Assigned Mediator may also continue a mediation that has been commenced for additional sessions upon the request of the parties to the mediation or if the Assigned Mediator determines that a continuation is in the best interest of the parties, *provided, however*, no Mediation Proceedings shall continue for a period beyond one-hundred-eighty (180) days following the Mediation Referral unless the period to mediate is extended by order of this Court on the request of Judge Tancredi, which request and order shall be filed on the docket in the relevant Avoidance Action. In the event that additional mediation sessions are held beyond the initial mediation session, the Assigned Mediator may, in their discretion, permit that such sessions be held by videoconference.\n\nu. Unless otherwise agreed or ordered by Judge Tancredi or the Court, Tthe fees and costs of the Assigned Mediator, if any (the \"Mediation Fee\"), shall be paid equally by the parties to any Mediation ProceedingsTrustee with the Mediation Fee for the initial mediation session due at least seven (7) days prior to the date such session is scheduled. Upon a showing that the payment of such amounts constitutes a hardship (submitted in writing with notice to all counter-parties to any Mediation Proceedings), Judge Tancredi or the Court may modify the parties' responsibilities for the Mediation Fee, *provided, however*, such relief shall be sought at least fourteen (14) days before any such Mediation Fee is due to be paid. The Mediation Fee shall be determined using the rates approved by the Court in connection with the appointment of the members of the Mediation Panel.\n\nv. Within seven (7) days after the conclusion of the mediation, the Assigned Mediator shall file a report (the \"Mediator's Report\") in the relevant Avoidance Action indicating whether the parties to the Mediation Proceedings complied with the Mediation Procedures and whether the Mediation Proceedings resulted in a settlement or not. [**NTD**: the mediation order cannot create a bespoke administrative sanction procedure in contravention of applicable statutes and rules. If any party wants sanctions, it has to seek same according to procedural and statutory rules.] The Mediator's Report shall not address the substance of mediation discussions. In addition, in the case of material noncompliance with the Mediation Procedures, an Assigned Mediator may file an interim report (an \"Interim Report\") in the relevant Avoidance Action advising the Court of such noncompliance. Where a Mediator's Report or an Interim Report indicates noncompliance with the Mediation Procedures, the Court may (without the filing of a motion by any party) schedule a hearing to consider the appropriateness of sanctions against the noncompliant party. Such sanctions may include, without limitation, assessing costs of the Mediation Proceedings and/or the opposing party's attorneys' fees against the noncompliant party. Additionally, in cases of willful, persistent, or egregious noncompliance, the Court may enter a default judgment or dismissal against the party that failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. Additionally, if any party to Mediation Proceedings is not attempting to schedule or resolve the mediation in good faith, an opposing party may file a motion for sanctions with the Court. Litigation with respect to the issuance of sanctions shall not delay the commencement of mediation.\n\nw. If the Mediator's Report indicates that the Mediation Proceedings resulted in a settlement and the settlement requires approval of the Court [**NTD:** don't all settlements in this case require court approval? If not, on what grounds?], the Trustee shall file a motion requesting such approval within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the Mediator's Report. The Trustee may submit a motion seeking such approval under seal (with access limited to the Trustee, the relevant Avoidance Defendant, the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, and the United States Trustee) to the extent the Trustee believes that public disclosure of the settlement terms would harm the estate and/or would implicate commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential information public disclosure of which would prejudice parties to the settlement. Where a motion is filed under seal, the Trustee shall file on the public docket a copy of the motion that redacts any commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential information.\n\nx. If a Mediator's Report does not indicate a full settlement of the claims between the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant, the deadline to respond to the Trustee's Avoidance Complaint shall be sixtythirty (630) days from the filing of the Mediator's Report or from the Court's determination of any motion to dismiss, whichever is later.\n\ny. Members of the Mediation Panel (if any) shall regularly consult with Judge Tancredi concerning the status of Mediation Proceedings to which they are assigned. In addition, to facilitate the mediation process and to minimize any burden on Judge Tancredi, the Trustee shall endeavor, in consultation with Judge Tancredi, to devise and propose to Judge Tancredi (on notice to Avoidance Defendants) categories of Avoidance Action claims (whether by amounts of transfers, timing of transfers, alter egos at issue, or otherwise). Any other party or parties may likewise propose to Judge Tancredi categories of Avoidance Actions, or respond to the Trustee's proposed categorization. AnySuch categorization adopted by Judge Tancredi shall not have any binding effect on any Avoidance Defendants as relates to the merits of claims or defenses in an Avoidance Action. Judge Tancredi may submit reports to the Court regarding the progress of Mediation Proceedings and any recommendations of Judge Tancredi to promote the efficient administration of the Avoidance Actions. Such reports shall be issued in writing and filed on the docket in the Main Case and the applicable adversary proceeding. Without limitation, these recommendations may include that certain Avoidance Actions and/or certain categories of Avoidance Actions be stayed for a fixed period prior to commencing one-on-one Mediation Proceedings. During the period of such a stay or otherwise, in order to facilitate the exchange of information and to encourage productive negotiations between the Trustee and Avoidance Defendants, Judge Tancredi may schedule informational sessions and/or mediation sessions that include multiple Avoidance Defendants and/or certain categories of Avoidance Defendants. For the avoidance of doubt, Avoidance Defendants who have opted out of mediation need not attend any such sessions. To the extent that Judge Tancredi recommends staying any Avoidance Actions and/or categories of Avoidance Actions, the Trustee (within seven (7) days of the issuance of such recommendations) shall cause notice of same to be filed in such actions. Upon a hearing but without need for the filing of a motion, but upon appropriate notice to the Avoidance Action Defendant(s), the Court may enter further orders addressing any recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi, including, without limitation, the stay of any Avoidance Actions or categories of Avoidance Actions prior to one-on-one mediation.\n\nz. Notwithstanding anything in the Avoidance Action Procedures to the contrary, these Mediation Procedures may be modified by the Court upon the request of the Trustee or any other party in interest, or as otherwise ordered by the Court (including, without limitation, upon recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi), upon notice issued in the Main Case only and an opportunity for a hearing, *provided, however*, the revised Mediation Procedures, upon approval, shall be filed in all Avoidance Actions.\n\n3. Within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order, the Trustee shall file the Avoidance\n\nAction Procedures Notice (in the revised form attached hereto as Exhibit 1) in all Avoidance\n\nActions pending as of the entry of this Order.\n\n4. The time periods set forth in this Order and the Avoidance Action Procedures shall\n\nbe calculated in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a).\n\n5. To the extent that information in an Avoidance Complaint (or its exhibits) may be subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, et al., this Order constitutes an order of a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing the disclosure of such information to any Avoidance Defendant and its counsel, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) and 12 C.F.R § 310.10(b). This Order also amends the Protective Order and the P.O. Addendum to permit the Trustee, to the extent provided in the Avoidance Action Procedures, to disclose to any Avoidance Defendant information in an Avoidance Complaint (filed against such defendant) that is designated as highly confidential under the Protective Order or the P.O. Addendum *provided that*, (i) the Trustee shall provide the party that designated the information as highly confidential at least 5 business days' notice of the intent to share this information with an Avoidance Defendant and the identity of that Avoidance Defendant, (ii) the Trustee shall not provide this information to an Avoidance Defendant if an objection is raised absent further order the Court, and (iii) the proposed recipient of the highly confidential information has agreed to be bound by the Protective Order and P.O. Addendum in writing provided to the party that provided the information to the Trustee.\n\n6. Pursuant to District of Connecticut Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5(e), District of Connecticut Local Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9077-1, Bankruptcy Rule 9018, and section 107(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, this constitutes an Order of the Court authorizing the sealed filing of Avoidance Complaints and of motions seeking approval of settlements to the extent permitted by the Mediation Procedures.\n\n7. Any Avoidance Defendant may request that the District Court withdraw the reference to this case or any proceeding at any time pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §158(d) and that request, including briefing and resolution, shall not be stayed by any provision of this Order.\n\n8. In order to insure the integrity of both the adjudicative process and the mediation process, the undersigned, as the judge presiding over the Chapter 11 cases and proceedings, will not participate in the mediation process and the Mediation Panel members and lead mediator will not provide any information about the positions taken by parties, or the substance of the mediation process, to the undersigned. The mediation process will remain confidential and separate from, and will proceed concurrently with, the adjudication of issues and proceedings in the Chapter 11 Cases and proceedings.\n\n7.9. The Court retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the implementation of this Order.\n\n8.10. This Order shall be effective immediately upon entry.\n\n## **EXHIBIT 1**\n\n**(Form Notice of Applicability of Avoidance Action Procedures)**\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                                                 |            | x                                    |                            |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------|\n| In re:                                                                                                      |            | :<br>:                               | Chapter 11                 |\n| et al.,1<br>HO WAN KWOK,                                                                                    |            | :<br>:                               | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)    |\n|                                                                                                             | Debtors.   | :<br>:<br>:                          | (Jointly Administered)     |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11<br>TRUSTEE,<br>v. | Plaintiff, | x<br>:<br>:<br>:<br>:<br>:<br>:<br>: | Adv. Proceeding No. [<br>] |\n| [NAME OF DEFENDANT]                                                                                         |            | :<br>:<br>:                          |                            |\n|                                                                                                             | Defendant. | :<br>:                               |                            |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                                                 |            | x                                    |                            |\n\n# **NOTICE OF APPLICABILITY OF AVOIDANCE ACTION PROCEDURES**\n\nPLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the Amended Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings entered by the Bankruptcy Court in the above-captioned chapter 11 case [ECF No. \\_\\_\\_] appended hereto as **Exhibit A**, is hereby made applicable to and governs this adversary proceeding.\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nDated: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ \\_\\_, 2024\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut\n\nBy: *\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_*\n\nPatrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n*and*\n\nNicholas A. Bassett *(*admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n*and*\n\nAvram E. Luft *(*admitted *pro hac vice*) Douglass Barron (admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6079 aviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n*Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n## **EXHIBIT 2**\n\n**(Caption Applicable to Omnibus Filings)**\n\n| UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT<br>DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT<br>BRIDGEPORT DIVISION |                                                                    |  |  |  |\n|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                      | x<br>:<br>Chapter 11                                               |  |  |  |\n| In re:                                                                           | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)                                  |  |  |  |\n| et al.,1<br>HO WAN KWOK,                                                         | :                                                                  |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | :<br>(Jointly Administered)                                        |  |  |  |\n| Debtors.                                                                         | :<br>:                                                             |  |  |  |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                      | x<br>Adv. Proc. Nos. 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                             |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                                    |  |  |  |\n| LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11                                                       | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                |  |  |  |\n| TRUSTEE,                                                                         | :<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                              |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                |  |  |  |\n| Plaintiff,                                                                       | :<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                              |  |  |  |\n| v.                                                                               | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | :<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                              |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | :<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                              |  |  |  |\n| AVOIDANCE DEFENDANTS                                                             | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | :<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                              |  |  |  |\n| Defendants.                                                                      | :<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | x<br>XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                              |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                     |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                                   |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                     |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                                   |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                     |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                                   |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                     |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,<br>24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24- |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                                   |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                     |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,                                   |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  | 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-                                     |  |  |  |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------                      | XXXX, 24-XXXX, and 24-XXXX                                         |  |  |  |\n|                                                                                  |                                                                    |  |  |  |\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n## **EXHIBIT 3-A**\n\n**(Avoidance Actions Subject to Stay)**\n\n| ADV. PROC. NO.          | FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT                           |\n|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05008 | Boardwalk Motor Imports LLC                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05009 | Mercantile Bank International                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05012 | Ogier                                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05014 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05017 | Post Oak Motor Cars LLC                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05020 | Slaughter Law Group PC                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05022 | FAM United LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05026 | Yieldesta LP                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05029 | Great Bowery Inc dba Camilla Lowther Management |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05030 | Vision Knight Capital (China) Fund              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05032 | Hugga LLC                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05037 | Triple2 Digital                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05038 | D4.Zero                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05041 | CFG Global Limited                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05043 | Loro Piana                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05045 | The Quinlan Law Firm LLC                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05046 | Janco SRL                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05050 | Oro Mont Alpi SRL                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05051 | Mindy Wechsler                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05052 | MF19 Inc                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05056 | FFP (BVI) Limited                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05068 | Caribe Condado LLC                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05080 | Reinhard Plank SRL                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05083 | UK Import Services Limited                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05084 | Tavares Cutting Inc                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05087 | Mosaicon Shoes SRL                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05088 | Tokyoseiki Co LTD                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05089 | Pellettieri Di Parma SRL                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05091 | Shalom B LLC dba Asher Fabric Concepts          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05094 | Solazzo Calzature SRL                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05095 | SOD Stone O_road Design GmbH                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05096 | 1245 Factory Place LLC                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05097 | Liapull S.R.L.                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05098 | Shing Seung Ankerite Engineering Ltd            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05099 | American Arbitration Association                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05104 | Ice24 SRO                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05106 | REACH MFG                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05111 | DNM Beauty Distribution                         |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05113 | 1322089 BC Ltd                                     |\n|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05116 | Hilton Management LLC                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05118 | J Tan Jewelry Design Inc                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05121 | Shaylen Music LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05123 | Bestview1 Pty Ltd                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05124 | Legends OWO LLC                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05127 | Waycap SPA                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05129 | Fay Ye                                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05131 | Lawrence River                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05136 | ASAP SRL                                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05137 | Bellerive Attorneys at Law                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05139 | Houston Litstar LLC                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05140 | Quinones Law PLLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05142 | Immobiliara Barbara 2000 SRL                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05143 | Dream Projects LLC                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05146 | Fortnum Information Security Limited               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05148 | Galaxy Ltd                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05150 | Jialin Qin                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05151 | Li Sho Yo                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05153 | Ming Ni                                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05155 | Hayashi Meiou                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05156 | 12476517 Canada Society                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05157 | DP Textile & Apparel Inc                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05160 | LA International Foundation                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05164 | National Sweepstakes Company LLC                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05165 | Oxford Visionary Ltd                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05166 | Chris Lee                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05169 | D&D Solutions LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05170 | The Gertz File Investigative Reporting Project Inc |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05173 | Wenhua Gong                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05174 | SGB Packaging                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05176 | Luminescence Co Ltd                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05177 | Xiaobo He                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05180 | Richmond Strategic Advisor                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05183 | Reverence Capital Partners Opportunities Fund I    |\n|                         | (Cayman) LP                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05191 | Deng Qian                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05193 | Fiesta Investments Ltd                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05195 | Shujuan Milne                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05197 | Great Lakes Drone Company                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05198 | G-Service LLC                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05205 | Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC                       |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05210 | Jiayao Gan                                     |\n|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05212 | Michael Li and Co                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05213 | GPS McQuhae LLP                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05215 | Bradley Staple, dba Staples Building Solutions |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05217 | Haisong Peng                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05218 | Hou Yuan Chan                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05224 | OSC Orbit Services Company LLC                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05227 | Tao Zheng                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05230 | Cayuse Government Services                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05231 | 9 East 40th Street                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05232 | Daihao Zhou                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05233 | Brune Law PC                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05234 | Lyzon Enterprises Corporation                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05235 | Halley Chen CPA Professional Corporation       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05236 | Feng Yi                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05237 | Qiang Hu                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05239 | Jianhai Jiao                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05240 | Fengjie Ma                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05241 | MZC Financial Inc                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05242 | Cotton Craft Textiles Intl Trading             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05243 | Ihotry Ltd                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05244 | Quick-Equip LLC                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05245 | RM Auctions Deutschland GmbH, et al.           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05246 | WA & HF LLC                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Curiosity Corp, et al.                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05250 | Scarabaeus Wealth Management AG                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05251 | LLC Stz Fund No. 1                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05252 | Gettr USA Inc                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05253 | Ivy Capital Advisor Limited                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05254 | NAV Consulting Inc                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05255 | Ziba Limited                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05256 | New Mulberry PTE Ltd                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05257 | Mishcon de Reya LLP                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05258 | Hogan Lovells International LLP                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05259 | Top Target General Trading LLC                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05260 | GCP Investment Advisors SL                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05261 | Starling                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05262 | Red Team Partners                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05264 | Smaragdos Mamzeris                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05265 | Siu Ming Je                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05266 | Gong Jianfen                                   |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05267 | Khaled Ashafy                              |\n|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05268 | Pure Global Group Limited                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc, et al. |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05272 | Hayman Hong Kong Opportunities             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05274 | Kin Ming Je                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Lamp Capital LLC, et al.                   |\n\n## **EXHIBIT 3-B**\n\n**(Avoidance Actions Subject to Partial Stay)**\n\n| ADV. PROC. NO.          | FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT                            |\n|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05006 | AWS (Amazon Web Services)                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05007 | Blueberry Builders                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05011 | E.L.J.M. Consulting LLC                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05016 | Imperius International Trad Co Ltd               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05019 | Mary Fashion SPA                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05021 | Bannon Strategic Advisors Inc                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05023 | Studio Cataldi Group SRL                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05024 | TT Resources 1 Pty Ltd                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05028 | Yuqiang Qin & Yunfu Jiang                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05044 | Teris                                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05054 | Style Eyes Inc. d/b/a Ginger Finds               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Amazon Inc                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05058 | Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05059 | Federal Express                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05060 | Apple Inc                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05065 | A.Z. Bigiotterie S.A.S. DI Zanutto Gabriele & C. |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05069 | B&H Photo                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05075 | Marcella Monica Falciani                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05077 | American Express                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05081 | Victor-Oasis Consultancy Limited                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05090 | Swans Team Design Inc                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05093 | 2 B Packing LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05102 | Ocorian Consulting Ltd                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05105 | N87 Inc                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05109 | Moran Yacht Management Inc                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05115 | Cloudflare                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05122 | Indium Software Inc                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05125 | Rilievi Group SRL                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05133 | Beile Li                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05134 | V.X. Cerda & Associates PA                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05135 | Liberty Jet Management                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05145 | Manhattan Motorcars Inc                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05152 | Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05154 | Kamel Debeche                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05159 | Gold Leaf Consulting Limited                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05161 | Mandelli USA Inc                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05163 | Harcus Parker Limited                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05172 | Federal Corporation (Japan)                      |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05175 | Lau Lai Chun Annie                   |\n|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05178 | Super Star Project Limited           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05179 | Rising Sun Capital Ltd               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05188 | Berkeley Rowe Ltd                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05188 | Weddle Law PLLC                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05189 | TD Avenue (The Diamond Avenue)       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05199 | Lawall & Mitchell LLC                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05203 | Oasis Tech Limited                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05204 | G4S Security Systems (Hong Kong) Ltd |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05206 | Hao Haidong                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05221 | Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05223 | G-Translators Pty Ltd                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05225 | Cirrus Design Corporation            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05226 | ACASS Canada Ltd                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05238 | Qiang Guo                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Tut Co Limited                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | BSA Strategic Fund I, et al.         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Weihua Li, et al.                    |\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3100 Filed 04/12/24 Entered 04/12/24 20:52:04 Page 66 of 69\n\n### **EXHIBIT 4**\n\n**(List of Avoidance Defendants Not Automatically Subject to Mediation Referral)**\n\n- 1. ACA Capital Limited\n- 2. Anton Development Limited\n- 3. Bannon Strategic Advisors, Inc.\n- 4. Barnett, Scott\n- 5. Berkeley Rowe Limited\n- 6. BSA Strategic Fund\n- 7. BSA Strategic Fund I\n- 8. Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC\n- 9. China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd.\n- 10. Debeche, Kamel\n- 11. DiBattista, Anthony\n- 12. Enriquez, Bernardo\n- 13. Federal Corporation\n- 14. Fiesta Investment Ltd. f/k/a Fiesta Property Developments Ltd.\n- 15. G Club Holdco I LLC\n- 16. G Club International Limited\n- 17. G Club Operations LLC\n- 18. G Club Three\n- 19. G Fashion\n- 20. G Fashion International Limited\n- 21. G Fashion Media Group Inc.\n- 22. Gettr USA, Inc.\n- 23. GF Italy, LLC\n- 24. GFNY Inc.\n- 25. Gold Leaf Consulting Limited\n- 26. Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC\n- 27. Golden Spring (New York) Limited\n- 28. Greenwich Land LLC\n- 29. GS Security Solutions Inc.\n- 30. G-Service LLC\n- 31. G-Translators Pty Ltd\n- 32. Guo, Mei\n- 33. Guo, Qiang\n- 34. Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC\n- 35. HAA Group Pty Ltd\n- 36. Hadjicharalambous, Alex\n- 37. Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd\n- 38. Hamilton Investment Management Ltd\n- 39. Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC\n- 40. Han, Chunguang\n- 41. Harcus Parker Limited\n- 42. HCHK Property Management Inc.\n- 43. HCHK Technologies Inc.\n- 44. Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.\n- 45. Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd.\n- 46. Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC\n- 47. Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.\n- 48. Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.\n- 49. Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd\n- 50. Himalaya International Reserves Ltd\n- 51. Himalaya New World Inc.\n- 52. Himalaya New York Rock\n- 53. Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC\n- 54. Himalaya UK Club\n- 55. Himalaya Worldwide LS\n- 56. HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd.\n- 57. Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited\n- 58. Hudson Diamond NY LLC\n- 59. Je, Kin Ming\n- 60. Krasner, Max\n- 61. Lamp Capital LLC\n- 62. Lawall & Mitchell, LLC\n- 63. Leading Shine NY Limited\n- 64. Lee, Chris\n- 65. Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.\n- 66. Miller, Jason\n- 67. Mitchell, Aaron\n- 68. MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc.\n- 69. Mountains of Spices Inc.\n- 70. Ngok, Hing Chi\n- 71. O.S.C. Orbit II Service Company LLC\n- 72. Omicron Nutraceutical LLC\n- 73. OSC Orbit Service Company LLC\n- 74. Oxford Visionary Ltd.\n- 75. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP\n- 76. Rising Sun Capital Ltd.\n- 77. Rong, Sin Ting\n- 78. Rosy Acme Ventures Limited\n- 79. Rule of Law III Foundation Inc.\n- 80. Rule of Law Society IV Inc.\n- 81. Saraca Media Group, Inc.\n- 82. Taurus Fund LLC\n- 83. The Francis Firm PLLC\n- 84. Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP\n- 85. UK Himalaya Ltd.\n- 86. V.X. Cerda & Associates P.A.\n- 87. Wang, Yanping\n- 88. Warroom Broadcasting & Media Communications LLC\n- 89. Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C.\n- 90. Zhang, Yongbing\n- 91. Any potential Avoidance Defendant that is subject to a stipulated tolling order entered by the Court.","body_zh":"美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，\n\n债务人。\n\n第11章\n\n案号：22-50073 (JAM)\n\n（合并管理）\n\nWEDDLE LAW PLLC（Weddle律师事务所）对第11章受托人根据11 U.S.C. §§ 105(A)和363、联邦破产程序规则7016、7026和9006，以及康涅狄格州联邦地区法院地方法破产规则7016-1提出的动议之异议；该动议请求修改适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序，以纳入撤销之诉调解程序\n\nWeddle Law PLLC（“Weddle Law”）通过其下列签署的律师，现就以下事项提出异议：(1)《第11章受托人根据11 U.S.C. §§ 105(a)和363、联邦破产程序规则7016、7026和9006，以及康涅狄格州地方法破产规则7016-1提出的动议：请求修改适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序，以纳入撤销之诉调解程序》[Doc No. 3003]（“动议”）；以及(2)《提交[修订拟议]经修订的命令通知：批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序》[Doc. No. 3035]（“修订拟议命令”），并为支持其异议，谨陈述如下：\n\n初步陈述\n\n1. Weddle Law与其他若干律师事务所一样，因在日常业务过程中收取向法律实体提供法律服务的报酬转让，而在本破产案件中面临诉讼；在该等转让发生时，该等法律实体尚未申请破产、尚未被裁定为或列入破产财产的资产，亦未与债务人实质性合并。受托人现主张该等实体系债务人的“另一个自我”，并基于该一事后主张，对Weddle Law提起撤销之诉，以追回已提供服务所支付的费用。\n\n2. 受托人的动议及修订拟议命令意图强制Weddle Law进入一项调解程序；该程序如获提议通过，将实质性增加Weddle Law的成本，要求采用单方且非自愿的程序，并以超出现行法律和规则的专门强制性制裁程序作为后盾。\n\n3. 因此，Weddle Law反对该动议及修订拟议命令，并请求本院全盘驳回。Weddle Law承认，受托人在两年期限届满前夕提起逾250项对抗程序，为本院和受托人造成行政危机；但不得允许受托人以减轻其自行造成的行政危机为由，对Weddle Law施加昂贵、强制且单方的程序。见 In re Amagansett Family Farm, Inc., Case No: 11-73929-AST, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 4161, at \\*14 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2011)。\n\n在对WEDDLE LAW提起任何诉讼之前的程序背景\n\n4. 2024年1月29日，受托人提交其《根据11 U.S.C. §105(a)、联邦破产程序规则7016、7026和9006，以及地区法院地方法破产规则7016-1提出的动议：请求批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序（ECN No. 253，关于批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序的命令）》[Doc No. 2532]（“程序动议”）。受托人通过程序动议请求本院批准若干程序，以管辖受托人已提起及将提起的撤销之诉。\n\n5. 2024年2月7日，本院作出命令，批准程序动议[Doc. No. 2578]。\n\n在对WEDDLE LAW提起诉讼之后的程序背景\n\n6. 2024年2月13日，受托人对Weddle Law提起诉状，请求撤销HCHK Technologies、HCHK Property Management和G Club Operations向Weddle Law作出的转让。尽管该等转让来自在当时尚未申请破产、尚未被裁定为债务人资产或与债务人实质性合并、且未列入债务人资产清单的实体，受托人的诉状仍主张，该等转让属于根据11 U.S.C. § 549可撤销的破产申请后遗产资产转让。\n\n7. 2024年3月15日，受托人提交动议，请求作出命令，要求修订本院已批准的程序，以纳入对某些撤销之诉进行强制调解的程序。\n\n8. 2024年3月22日，受托人提交其修订拟议命令。除其他请求的变更外，修订拟议命令规定了拟议程序，以管辖对某些撤销之诉的调解。\n\n9. 2024年3月22日，本院亦就经修订程序动议作出排期命令[Doc. No. 3037]（“排期命令”），要求任何对该动议的答复须于2024年4月12日前提交，并将该动议的听证会排期于2024年4月23日举行。\n\n10. 根据本院命令，Weddle Law提出动议或答复该诉状的期限为2024年4月20日。\n\n11. 自提交该动议以来，Weddle Law的律师已与受托人的律师讨论该事项，双方已尝试解决有关命令措辞及其中若干条款的争议。双方取得了一些进展，并得以缩小争议事项。为此，受托人于2024年4月10日向下列签署人提供了修订拟议命令的拟议修订版本。受托人起草的修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本副本作为附件A附于本文件之后。1\n\n12. 尽管受托人同意作出附件A所载的（以修订痕迹标示的）变更，修订程序命令的2024年4月10日版本并未解决Weddle Law就拟议调解程序所提出的全部关切。\n\n对拟议经修订命令的部分异议\n\n13. Weddle Law基于以下理由，部分反对修订程序命令的2024年4月10日版本：\n\n(i) 修订拟议命令并非将其适用范围限于调解及程序，而是设置了陷阱，使撤销之诉被告放弃实体抗辩，例如当被告被送达“经删节的撤销诉状”时有关诉讼文书送达的抗辩。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(d)段。一项确立程序的动议，不应在Weddle Law尚未有机会就该问题陈述意见之前，决定诸如诉讼文书送达是否充分等实体问题。\n\n(ii) 修订拟议命令未明确划定哪些诉讼被中止以及被部分中止，因此受托人必须依本院命令予以澄清，以防任何撤销之诉被告无意中违反本第11章案件中的众多命令之一。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(e)(ii)段。\n\n1. 尽管受托人尚未将修订拟议命令的2024年4月10日版本登记在案，受托人的律师已陈述，受托人已同意附件A中由受托人作出的以修订痕迹标示的变更。\n\n(iii) 修订拟议命令意图确立单方调解程序。因此，修订拟议命令授权受托人选择在调解小组任职的调解员，并未给予任何撤销之诉被告发表意见的机会。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(k)段。尽管双方均参与发表意见在替代性争议解决中属常态，本巡回区法院认为由法院在未听取所有当事人意见的情况下指定调解员是难以实行的。见 In Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y., 634 B.R. 839, 846 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2021)。因此，小组组成应完全由Tancredi法官酌定。\n\n(iv) 同样，修订拟议命令试图允许受托人（且仅允许受托人）单方接触Trancredi法官，此举属单方性质，不应获采纳。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(r)段。调解是一项程序，除非其不仅公平，而且被所有参与者视为公平，否则无法发挥作用。赋予受托人对调解小组组成的控制权，以及单方特别接触Tancredi法官的权利，会损害该程序的任何公平表象。\n\n(v) 该命令规定，如撤销之诉被告认为针对其的请求不应进行调解，其必须证明存在“正当理由”以使该等请求免于适用调解程序。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(i)段。“正当理由”在该命令中未被定义。由于和解一项请求属于自愿行为，参与调解也应当如此。本巡回区法院已否决此类强制出席调解的要求。见 Diocese of Buffalo, N.Y., 634 B.R. at 845；In re A.T. Reynolds & Sons, Inc., 452 B.R. 374 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)。如被告希望通过法庭审理检验受托人请求的是非曲直，其应能够“选择退出”调解程序，而无需提交动议并满足某项未定义的标准。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(m)段。该等程序只会增加撤销之诉被告的成本，并损害调解的目的——在相关撤销之诉中，如可达成协议，则促成自愿妥协。因此，撤销之诉被告应能够选择退出调解，无需证明正当理由，亦无需进行不必要且昂贵的动议程序。\n\n(vi) 现行起草的修订拟议命令（无论是否出于无意）阻止在调解中提出的证言或文件在诉讼法庭中被使用或出示。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(q)段。为免生疑，Weddle Law已澄清该条款，以便受托人不得将调解作为盾牌，拒绝交出可通过其他途径取得的证据开示材料，例如根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》、破产规则及证据规则可取得的材料。\n\n(vii) 修订拟议命令要求被告分担任何调解费用，不应获采纳。附件A，修订拟议命令2024年4月10日版本，第2(u)段。在这270项撤销之诉中，此类费用分担并不适当。与Weddle Law等被告不同——其已因受托人的对抗程序而被迫承担诉讼费用——受托人的律师费由遗产支付，受托人应分担的任何调解费用无疑亦由遗产支付。（受托人自己的律师事务所迄今已收取逾$20 million的专业费用。[2]）因此，只有被要求分担调解费用的被告承受额外财务负担，这将调解从公平、自愿的程序转变为对被告的单方税负。在此，受托人不应能够将这一已然昂贵程序的负担转嫁给撤销之诉被告。受托人提起了撤销之诉，且受托人是希望强制Weddle Law就诉状所依据的问题进行调解的一方。因此，应要求受托人支付调解费用。见 In re Verasun Energy Corporation, et al., Case No. 08-12606 (BLS) [Doc. No. 2940] (D. Del. Dec 21, 2010)（要求强制调解的一方承担调解的全部费用）；In re Red Rose, Inc., Case No. BK-S-20-12814-MKN [Doc. No. 1992] (D. Nev. Aug 12, 2021)（同）。\n\n(viii) 经修订的拟议命令不当创设了一套专门定制的行政性且自动生效的程序，以对被告施加制裁；该程序违反了向诉讼当事人寻求制裁的既定法定要求，并且不当地试图强制被告达成和解。任何调解程序命令均必须删除此类程序。附件A，经修订的拟议命令的4月10日版本，第2(v)款。\n\n14. 随附于此的附件B载有 Weddle Law（韦德尔律师事务所）对经修订的拟议命令4月10日版本所提出的修订建议（以修订痕迹标示），该等修订旨在处理上述命令问题以及其他轻微修订。\n\n15. Weddle Law 明确保留其在各方面的一切权利，包括但不限于补充本异议的权利、对受托人或本第11章案件中的任何其他当事人提出的任何经修订调解和/或撤销之诉程序提出异议的权利，以及申请额外和进一步救济的权利。Weddle Law 亦不放弃并明确保留对本诉讼的一切异议和抗辩，包括但不限于基于管辖权、不当审判地及送达程序充分性的异议。\n\n16. Weddle Law 亦加入其他异议人就该动议及经修订程序命令所提交的异议。\n\n结论\n\n17. 基于上述理由，Weddle Law 谨请求法院依照随附附件B所列的拟议修改内容，对经修订程序命令作出修改。\n\n日期：April 12, 2024　WEDDLE LAW PLLC（韦德尔律师事务所有限责任专业公司）\n\n签署人：/s/ Kellianne Baranowsky　GREEN & SKLARZ LLC（格林与斯克拉兹有限责任公司）　Jeffrey M. Sklarz（杰弗里·M·斯克拉兹）　Kellianne Baranowsky（凯莉安·巴拉诺夫斯基）　One Audubon St, 3rd Floor　New Haven, CT 06511　电话：203-285-8545　jsklarz@gs-lawfirm.com　kbaranowsky@gs-lawfirm.com\n\n以及\n\nRichard J. Corbi（理查德·J·科尔比）（待批准临时出庭资格）　The Law Offices of Richard J. Corbi PLLC（理查德·J·科尔比律师事务所有限责任专业公司）　1501 Broadway, 12th Floor　New York, NY 10036　[rcorbi@corbilaw.com]\n\nWeddle Law PLLC 的律师\n\n送达证明\n\n本人特此证明，于下列日期，前述文件副本已通过 CM/ECF 送达。各方可通过法院的 CM/ECF 系统查阅本次提交文件。\n\n日期：April 12, 2024\n\n/s/Kellianne Baranowsky　Kellianne Baranowsky（凯莉安·巴拉诺夫斯基）\n\n附件A\n\n受托人拟议经修订程序命令的4月10日版本\n\n美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院布里奇波特分庭\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等人，\n\n债务人。\n\n-----------------------------------------------------x-----　x\n\n：\n\n第11章\n\n：\n\n：\n\n案件编号：22-50073 (JAM)\n\n：\n\n：\n\n（合并管理）\n\n：\n\n：\n\nx\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第11章\n\n受托人，\n\n原告，\n\n诉　：\n\n对抗程序案号：24-05005, 24-05006, 24-05007,\n\n：\n\n24-05008, 24-05009, 24-05010, 24-05011, 24-\n\n：\n\n：\n\n05012, 24-05013, 24-05014, 24-05015, 24-05016,\n\n：\n\n24-05017, 24-05018, 24-05019, 24-05020, 24-\n\n：\n\n05021, 24-05022, 24-05023, 24-05024, 24-05025,\n\n：\n\n24-05026, 24-05027, 24-05028, 24-05029, 24-\n\n撤销之诉被告\n\n被告。　05030, 24-05031, 24-05032, 24-05033, 24-05034,\n\n：\n\n24-05035, 24-05036, 24-05037, 24-05038, 24-\n\n：\n\n：\n\n05039, 24-05040, 24-05041, 24-05042, 24-05043,\n\n：\n\n24-05044, 24-05045, 24-05046, 24-05047, 24-\n\nx\n\n05048, 24-05049, 24-05050, 24-05051, 24-05052,\n\n24-05053, 24-05054, 24-05055, 24-05056, 24-\n\n05057, 24-05058, 24-05059, 24-05060, 24-05061,\n\n24-05062, 24-05063, 24-05064, 24-05065, 24-\n\n05066, 24-05067, 24-05068, 24-05069, 24-05070,\n\n24-05071, 24-05072, 24-05073, 24-05074, 24-\n\n05075, 24-05076, 24-05077, 24-05078, 24-05079,\n\n24-05080, 24-05081, 24-05082, 24-05083, 24-\n\n05084, 24-05085, 24-05086, 24-05087, 24-05088,\n\n24-05089, 24-05090, 24-05091, 24-05092, 24-\n\n05093, 24-05094, 24-05095, 24-05096, 24-05097,\n\n24-05098, 24-05099, 24-05100, 24-05101, 24-\n\n（抬头续见下一页）　05102, 24-05102, 24-05103, 24-05104, 24-05105,\n\n24-05106, 24-05107, 24-05108, 24-05109, 24-\n\n1 本第11章案件的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（又名 Guo Wengui（郭文贵）、Miles Guo（郭文贵）及 Miles Kwok（郭文贵），以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（吉尼弗控股有限责任公司）（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（吉尼弗控股公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（宝盛律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，转交 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 遗产的受托人（仅用于通知和通信之目的）。\n\n05110, 24-05111, 24-05112, 24-05113, 24-05114, 24-05115, 24-05116, 24-05117, 24-05118, 24-05119, 24-05120, 24-05121, 24-05122, 24-05123, 24-05124, 24-05125, 24-05126, 24-05127, 24-05128, 24-05129, 24-05130, 24-05131, 24-05132, 24-05133, 24-05134, 24-05135, 24-05136, 24-05137, 24-05138, 24-05139, 24-05140, 24-05141, 24-05142, 24-05143, 24-05144, 24-05145, 24-05146, 24-05147, 24-05148, 24-05149, 24-05150, 24-05151, 24-05152, 24-05153, 24-05154, 24-05155, 24-05156, 24-05157, 24-05158, 24-05159, 24-05160, 24-05161, 24-05162, 24-05163, 24-05164, 24-05165, 24-05166, 24-05167, 24-05168, 24-05169, 24-05170, 24-05171, 24-05172, 24-05173, 24-05174, 24-05175, 24-05176, 24-05177, 24-05178, 24-05179, 24-05180, 24-05181, 24-05182, 24-05183, 24-05184, 24-05185, 24-05186, 24-05187, 24-05188, 24-05189, 24-05190, 24-05191, 24-05192, 24-05193, 24-05194, 24-05195, 24-05196, 24-05197, 24-05198, 24-05199, 24-05200, 24-05201, 24-05202, 24-05203, 24-05204, 24-05205, 24-05206, 24-05207, 24-05208, 24-05209, 24-05210, 24-05211, 24-05212, 24-05213, 24-05214, 24-05215, 24-05216, 24-05217, 24-05218, 24-05219, 24-05220, 24-05221, 24-05222, 24-05223, 24-05224, 24-05225, 24-05226, 24-05227, 24-05228, 24-05229, 24-05230, 24-05231, 24-05232, 24-05233, 24-05234, 24-05235, 24-05236, 24-05237, 24-05238, 24-05239, 24-05240, 24-05241, 24-05242, 24-05243, 24-05244, 24-05245, 24-05246, 24-05247, 24-05248, 24-05250, 24-05251, 24-05252, 24-05253, 24-05254, 24-05255, 24-05256, 24-05257, 24-05258, 24-05259, 24-05260, 24-05261, 24-05262, 24-05263, 24-05264, 24-05265, 24-05266, 24-05267, 24-05268, 24-05269, 24-05270, 24-05271, 24-05272, 24-05274, 24-05275\n\n[经修订拟议] 经修订命令：批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序\n\n经审理 Luc A. Despins 以其在 Ho Wan Kwok（以下简称“债务人”）第11章案件中获任命的第11章受托人（以下简称“受托人”）身份提出的动议（以下简称“动议”）2，请求法院依据《美国法典》第11编（以下简称“破产法典”）第105(a)条及第363条、《联邦破产程序规则》（以下简称“破产规则”）第7016、7026及9006条，以及《康涅狄格州联邦地区破产程序地方法规则》（以下简称“当地破产规则”）第7016-1条，作出一项命令（本“命令”），以修改法院关于批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序的命令 [ECF No. 2578]（以下简称“撤销程序命令”），从而修改撤销之诉程序，以纳入某些规管撤销之诉调解的程序；且本院根据 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 及 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut（康涅狄格州联邦地区法院）的移送常设命令，对审理该动议及其中请求的救济具有管辖权；且根据 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)，审理该动议及其中请求的救济属于核心程序；且根据 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409，本院为适当审判地；且法院已认定，动议中请求的救济符合债务人第11章遗产、其债权人及所有利害关系方的最佳利益；且在具体情况下已就该动议发出适当且充分的通知；且看来无需发出任何其他或进一步通知；且经本院进行的所有程序，包括于 April 23, 2024 举行的听证；且对本命令所请求救济提出的任何异议均已撤回或经实体审理被驳回；且经适当审议并有充分理由，现特此命令：\n\n1. 准许该动议，如本命令所述。\n\n2 本命令中使用但未另行定义的首字母大写术语，具有动议中赋予该等术语的含义。\n\n2. 法院特此命令，以下经修订的撤销之诉程序\n\n应管辖撤销之诉：\n\na. 撤销之诉程序应适用于受托人于 February 1, 2024 当日或之后提起的任何对抗程序，其中受托人仅依据破产法典第544、547、548、549及550条以及适用州法下的类似请求主张权利（以下简称“撤销之诉”）。\n\nb. 在提交提起任何撤销之诉的起诉状（以下简称“撤销起诉状”）时，受托人应提交一份形式与随附附件1实质相似的撤销之诉程序适用通知（以下简称“撤销之诉程序通知”）。受托人应根据破产规则第7004条，将撤销之诉程序通知副本连同传票及撤销起诉状，一并送达撤销之诉中的每一被告（以下简称“撤销之诉被告”）。\n\nc. 影响多个撤销之诉的动议，应在每一适用的撤销之诉中提交，并应使用实质上采用随附附件2形式的抬头。\n\nd. 如撤销起诉状（包括附件）包含根据保护令 [主案 ECF No. 923]（以下简称“保护令”）及保护令约定补充文件 [主案 ECF No. 2460]（以下简称“保护令补充文件”）被指定为机密或高度机密的信息，受托人可将撤销起诉状密封提交（以下简称“密封撤销起诉状”）；但受托人应公开提交一份撤销起诉状副本，其中删节任何被指定为机密或高度机密的信息（以下简称“删节撤销起诉状”）。送达删节撤销起诉状，应构成破产规则第7004条所要求的充分起诉状送达。尽管保护令及保护令补充文件中有任何相反规定，在任何撤销之诉被告及其律师各自签署保护令附件A的副本，以及在适用情况下签署保护令补充文件附件A的副本后，受托人可向该撤销之诉被告提供未删节撤销起诉状副本。\n\ne. 撤销之诉被告就任何撤销起诉状作出答复的期限（以下简称“答复日期”）应为向该撤销之诉被告完成送达之日起六十（60）日；但无需法院另行命令，受托人及任何撤销之诉被告可约定将被告的答复日期进一步延长最多九十（90）日。任何该等约定均应以书面作出，并在适用对抗程序的案卷中提交。撤销之诉。尽管本命令中有任何相反规定：\n\ni. 随附附件3-A所列的撤销之诉（以下简称“中止撤销之诉”）应中止，直至法院进一步命令。在中止撤销之诉的中止状态解除时，法院应决定中止撤销之诉是否应受调解程序约束，并为该等诉讼中的撤销之诉被告就撤销起诉状作出答复设定期限。\n\nii. 附于本文件的附件 3-B 所列的撤销诉讼（以下简称“部分中止的撤销诉讼”），就涉及 ACA Capital Group Ltd（ACA资本集团有限公司）、Anton Development Limited（安东发展有限公司）、G Club International Limited（G俱乐部国际有限公司）、G Club Operations LLC（G俱乐部运营有限责任公司）、G Fashion（G时尚）、G Fashion Media Group Inc.（G时尚媒体集团股份有限公司）、GFNY Inc.（GFNY股份有限公司）、Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）、Himalaya International Clearing Ltd（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）、Leading Shine NY Ltd（领尚纽约有限公司）、Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.（法治基金会III股份有限公司）、Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会IV股份有限公司）及 Saraca Media Group Inc.（萨拉卡媒体集团股份有限公司）是否为债务人的替身实体，和/或该等实体的财产是否属于债务人和/或债务人第11章破产财产的任何法律或事实问题（统称“中止争议事项”），应仅就该等问题中止，直至法院进一步命令。为免生疑问，部分中止的撤销诉讼应就所有不属于中止争议事项的问题，依照调解程序（定义见本文件）继续进行调解；但中止争议事项亦可在自愿基础上进行调解。\n\niii. 在提起任何新的撤销诉讼后，受托人可通过在相关撤销诉讼中提交指定通知（以下简称“中止指定通知”），将该诉讼指定为中止的撤销诉讼或部分中止的撤销诉讼。任何希望对中止指定通知提出异议的撤销诉讼被告，应于在该相关撤销诉讼中出庭后七（7）日内，在该撤销诉讼中提交对该通知的答复；受托人可于提交该答复后十四（14）日内提交回复。有关中止指定通知的任何争议，应由法院裁定。\n\nf. 如任何撤销诉讼被告通过依据《民事诉讼规则》第12(b)条提交动议而对撤销诉状作出回应，受托人应有六十（60）日就该动议作出回应；但如该动议在撤销诉讼受中止期间提交，或撤销诉讼在该动议待决期间被中止，受托人应于中止终止后六十（60）日内就该动议作出回应。撤销诉讼被告应有三十（30）日就受托人对依据《民事诉讼规则》第12条提交的动议所作的任何回应提交回复。\n\ng. 除非法院另有命令，任何撤销诉讼均不会在证据开示前举行依据《破产程序规则》第7016条的首次审前会议，因此，法院书记员签发并由受托人送达的传票将不包括审前会议日期。在撤销诉讼的任何一方认为有必要召开审前会议以处理排期或其他问题的范围内，任何一方均可随时通过在该撤销诉讼的案卷中提交请求，申请召开该会议。\n\nh. 于答复日期后在可行的最早时间内，如撤销诉讼未被中止，当事人应依照《民事诉讼规则》第26(f)条进行协商（以下简称“首次案件会议”）；其后，当事人应提交一份共同拟议的排期命令，规范证据开示、简易判决及其他审前程序，但须经法院批准。如法院未批准共同拟议的排期命令，法院应安排审前会议以确定排期命令。如当事人未能就共同拟议的排期命令达成一致，当事人应申请召开审前会议以确定排期命令。如撤销诉讼被中止，当事人应于中止终止后在可行的最早时间举行首次案件会议，并在此后遵守前述程序。《民事诉讼规则》第26条（以其被《破产程序规则》第7026条纳入的范围为限）、District of Connecticut（康涅狄格地区）《地方法院民事规则》第26条及 District of Connecticut（康涅狄格地区）《地方法院破产规则》第7026-1条应适用于撤销诉讼，但本命令或法院其他命令明确修改的范围除外。\n\ni. 撤销诉讼的任何一方均可在有正当理由的情况下，请求修改撤销诉讼程序在该撤销诉讼中的适用。该修改应通过在适用的撤销诉讼中提交动议提出请求。\n\nj. 尽管本文件有任何相反规定，撤销诉讼程序应受下列有关调解程序的程序（以下简称“调解程序”）管辖，该等程序适用于在 April 4, 2024 前已获送达程序文件的任何撤销诉讼被告：如任何撤销诉讼被告在其对受托人撤销诉状作出答复的期限届满前在撤销诉讼中出庭，受托人在该撤销诉讼中针对该撤销诉讼被告的请求应自动（且无需进一步命令）移交至不具约束力的调解程序（定义见本文件，以下简称“调解程序”）（以下简称“调解移交”），但任何调解移交均不得视为在 May 15, 2024 前已经发生。发生调解移交后，撤销诉讼应仅就该撤销诉讼被告被中止（包括但不限于该撤销诉讼被告对撤销诉状作出答复的义务），直至调解程序结束。如撤销诉讼被告在其对撤销诉状作出答复的期限届满后才在撤销诉讼中出庭，除非受托人与该撤销诉讼被告在该撤销诉讼中提交书面约定，或法院作出命令，否则不得发生调解移交。为免生疑问，就某一特定撤销诉讼被告中止任何撤销诉讼，并不导致就任何其他撤销诉讼被告中止该撤销诉讼；就某一撤销诉讼被告中止某一特定撤销诉讼，亦不导致中止受托人在该撤销诉讼之外针对该撤销诉讼被告提出的任何其他请求（无论是在其他撤销诉讼中或以其他方式提出）。尽管本文件有任何相反规定，除非受托人与附随附件4所列的该撤销诉讼被告达成约定，或法院作出命令，否则受托人针对该等撤销诉讼被告的任何请求均不应适用调解移交。在撤销诉讼被告未于 April 4, 2024 前获送达程序文件的范围内，受托人可与该撤销诉讼被告约定适用调解程序（该约定应以书面形式作出并在相关撤销诉讼中提交）；或者，在向该撤销诉讼被告送达后，受托人可提交动议（并通知该撤销诉讼被告），请求将调解程序适用于该撤销诉讼被告。\n\nk. United States Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi（美国破产法院法官詹姆斯·J·坦克雷迪，以下简称“Tancredi法官”）应监督所有调解程序；但如受托人在与Tancredi法官协商后确定设立该等小组将有益处，调解应由Tancredi法官或由获批准的撤销诉讼调解员小组（以下简称“调解小组”）中的调解员进行。任何调解小组的成员应由受托人在与Tancredi法官协商后选定，但须经法院批准每名该等调解员的任命及适用于其的报酬费率。受托人应仅通过在主案中依照所有适用规则提交动议，并向受调解程序约束的所有撤销诉讼被告送达该动议，请求该等批准；调解员被任命至调解小组应于法院批准后生效。\n\nl. 在任何调解移交后十四（14）日内，受托人与相关撤销诉讼被告应通过提交给Tancredi法官法庭书记员的信函，共同联系Tancredi法官，简要且不带辩论性地说明所涉请求，并告知其在后续六十（60）日内参与调解的可用时间，以及调解会议是否应当线下举行或通过视频会议举行。收到该信函后，Tancredi法官应指定由其本人或由调解小组成员调解该撤销诉讼（以下简称“指定调解员”），并应指示调解线下举行或通过视频会议举行。Tancredi法官可命令合并相关的调解程序（包括在适当情况下于单一撤销诉讼中针对多名被告提出请求的情形）。\n\nm. 作为替代方案，任何认为针对其提出的请求不应受调解约束的撤销诉讼被告，可在调解移交后十四（14）日内向法院提交动议，说明将针对其的请求排除适用调解程序的正当理由，并通知受托人和Tancredi法官。在法院对该动议作出裁定前，不得针对该撤销诉讼被告进行调解程序。如法院准许该动议，调解程序应视为立即终止，且撤销诉讼被告应于该终止后三十（30）日内对受托人的撤销诉状作出答复。如法院驳回该动议，受托人与撤销诉讼被告应于该驳回后十四（14）日内，依照上述第l段规定的程序以信函联系Tancredi法官，以取得指定调解员。\n\nn. 指定调解员在收到其被指定的通知后，应有机会确定其就受调解的撤销诉讼被告是否存在任何利益冲突；如存在利益冲突，除非该利益冲突已向受托人及撤销诉讼被告披露且经其明确放弃，指定调解员可以不参与该特定调解。如指定调解员不参与，Tancredi法官应从调解小组中指定一名替代调解员，或指定其本人进行调解。如调解程序的一方认为利益冲突妨碍指定调解员履职，该方可通过经其法庭书记员提交给Tancredi法官的信函（副本送交对方及指定调解员），或通过向法院提交动议，请求指定不同的指定调解员；但该救济仅可于一方发现寻求该救济的依据后十四（14）日内请求。在指定调解员披露利益冲突或调解程序的一方及时提出异议的范围内，该调解程序应暂停，直至：(a) Tancredi法官选定一名替代调解员担任指定调解员；(b) 利益冲突被放弃；或 (c) 任何重新指定请求被驳回。\n\no. 指定调解员获指派后，受托人与撤销被告应就首次调解会议的日期与指定调解员协商。指定调解员应安排调解于获指派后六十（60）日内进行；但是，经当事人及指定调解员同意，调解会议可安排在较晚日期，但该日期须在本裁定第（t）款规定的完成调解程序期限内。如调解以现场方式进行，指定调解员还应选择调解地点；但是，除非当事人及指定调解员另有约定，任何现场调解仅应在康涅狄格地区或纽约市大都会区内的下列地点进行：(i) 受托人律师的办公室，(ii) United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut（美国康涅狄格地区破产法院）的设施，或 (iii) 指定调解员的办公室。指定调解员应至少提前二十一（21）日就调解的首次日期、时间及地点发出书面通知（以下简称“调解通知”），并应促使该调解通知提交至相关撤销诉讼。\n\np. 经当事人在任何已安排的调解会议至少七（7）日前同意，指定调解员可（按其酌情决定）重新安排该调解会议。如受托人或相关撤销被告在未获相对方或指定调解员同意的情况下，或在调解会议前七（7）日内，寻求重新安排调解会议，则该请求应通过其法庭书记员以函件形式向 Tancredi 法官（坦克雷迪法官）提出，相对方和/或指定调解员亦应通过其法庭书记员以函件形式向 Tancredi 法官提交任何答复。Tancredi 法官随后将决定是否应重新安排该调解会议，以及如该调解会议安排在请求之日起不足七（7）日内进行，指定调解员是否有权获得报酬及由哪一方或哪些方承担该等报酬。\n\nq. 与调解程序有关的一切程序及书面材料均应视为享有特权并具有保密性，且受 Federal Rule of Evidence 408（《联邦证据规则》第408条）的全部保护；除证明某一方未遵守调解程序外，不得因任何理由予以报告或作为证据采纳。除本款规定外，任何一方均不得传唤指定调解员或 Tancredi 法官作为证人。任何一方不得试图强制指定调解员（包括其代理人、合伙人或其各自律师事务所或组织的雇员）或 Tancredi 法官作证，或强制其出示文件；但是，在遵从法院命令的前提下，如在程序中指称某一方未遵守调解程序，任何一方可传唤指定调解员作为证人，并可在有限范围内强制其作证。除非法院另行命令指定调解员，否则当事人向指定调解员提供的任何文件，均应于提交调解员报告后三十（30）日内销毁。\n\nr. 指定调解员应主持任何调解会议，并有完全权力决定当事人陈述的性质及顺序，且证据规则不适用。指定调解员可根据具体情形实施合理且切实可行的附加程序。受托人及作为调解程序当事人的任何撤销被告，可在其指定调解员认为适当的范围内与其指定调解员进行单方沟通。受托人及其律师可就本调解程序的实施、调解小组调解员的遴选、撤销诉讼的分类和/或 Tancredi 法官向法院提出的任何建议，与 Tancredi 法官进行单方沟通。\n\ns. 任何调解程序的当事人均应本着诚信并以达成协商一致解决方案为目标，按照指定调解员安排并主持的方式参与该等程序。调解会议应由被告的一名拥有完全和解授权的代表（如被告由律师代理，则包括其律师）以及受托人和/或受托人的律师（其必须获得受托人的和解授权）出席（可亲自出席，或在获准时通过视频会议出席）。指定调解员可按其酌情决定要求当事人在调解前准备调解陈述；除非指定调解员另有指示，该等调解陈述不得与调解的另一方共享。指定调解员可就调解陈述向当事人发布进一步指示。\n\nt. 指定调解员可在调解通知中或在无需提交的单独通知中，要求当事人向指定调解员提供任何相关文书和证物、立场陈述和/或和解提议。指定调解员可按其酌情决定，经通知（无需提交），延期调解，或将调解移至调解程序授权地点范围内的另一地点。经调解当事人请求，或如指定调解员认定继续进行符合当事人的最佳利益，指定调解员亦可将已经开始的调解延续至额外会议；但是，除非经 Tancredi 法官请求并由本院命令延长调解期限，否则任何调解程序不得在调解转介后持续超过一百八十（180）日，该请求及命令应提交至相关撤销诉讼的案卷记录。如在首次调解会议之外举行额外调解会议，指定调解员可按其酌情决定允许该等会议通过视频会议举行。\n\nu. 除非 Tancredi 法官或法院另有约定或命令，指定调解员的费用及成本（如有）（以下简称“调解费”）应由任何调解程序的当事人平均支付，首次调解会议的调解费应至少在该会议预定日期前七（7）日到期支付。如证明支付该等款项构成困难（应以书面形式提交，并通知任何调解程序的所有相对方），Tancredi 法官或法院可修改当事人对调解费的责任；但是，必须在任何该等调解费到期支付日前至少十四（14）日寻求该等救济。如向法院请求该等救济，应以提交于相关撤销诉讼中的书面文件提出，该文件可密封提交；但是，撤销被告应向受托人提供任何该等密封提交文件的副本。受托人对该等密封提交文件作出的任何答复，同样可在向相关撤销被告相互通知后密封提交。调解费应按照法院就任命调解小组成员所批准的费率确定。\n\nv. 调解结束后七（7）日内，指定调解员应在相关撤销诉讼中提交报告（以下简称“调解员报告”），说明调解程序的当事人是否遵守调解程序，以及调解程序是否达成和解。调解员报告不得涉及调解讨论的实质内容，亦不得提供任何可能达成的和解的细节。此外，如存在对调解程序的重大不遵守，指定调解员可在相关撤销诉讼中提交中期报告（以下简称“中期报告”），将该等不遵守情况告知法院。如调解员报告或中期报告表明未遵守调解程序，法院可（无需任何一方提交动议）安排听证，以审议对未遵守方实施制裁是否适当。该等制裁可包括但不限于，责令未遵守方承担调解程序的成本和/或对方的律师费。此外，在故意、持续或严重不遵守的情形下，法院可对未遵守调解程序的一方作出缺席判决或驳回。另如调解程序的任何一方并非本着诚信尝试安排或解决调解，对方可向法院提交制裁动议。有关实施制裁的诉讼不应延迟调解的开始。仅仅未能达成和解不得构成认定“恶意”或实施制裁的理由。\n\nw. 如调解员报告表明调解程序达成和解，且该和解需要法院批准，受托人应于调解员报告出具后三十（30）日内提交请求该等批准的动议。如受托人认为公开披露和解条款将损害破产财产和/或将涉及商业敏感或其他保密信息，且公开披露该等信息将损害和解当事人，受托人可在密封状态下提交寻求该等批准的动议（访问权限仅限于受托人、相关撤销被告、Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors（无担保债权人官方委员会）及 United States Trustee（美国受托人））。如动议以密封状态提交，受托人应在公开案卷记录中提交该动议的副本，并隐去任何商业敏感或其他保密信息。\n\nx. 如调解员报告未表明受托人与撤销被告之间的请求已得到全面和解，则对受托人撤销起诉状作出答复的期限应为自提交调解员报告之日起三十（30）日。\n\ny. 调解小组成员（如有）应就其获指派的调解程序的状况定期与 Judge Tancredi（坦克雷迪法官）协商。此外，为促进调解程序并尽量减少 Tancredi 法官的负担，受托人应与 Tancredi 法官协商，努力制定撤销诉讼请求的类别（无论按转让金额、转让时间、所涉另一个自我实体或其他标准）。该等分类对于任何撤销诉讼被告，就撤销诉讼中的请求或抗辩之实体问题而言，均不具有约束力。Tancredi 法官可就调解程序的进展以及其为促进撤销诉讼高效管理而提出的任何建议，向本院提交报告。该等报告应以书面形式作出，并提交至主案案卷。该等建议可包括但不限于：在启动一对一特定调解程序之前，将某些撤销诉讼和/或某些类别的撤销诉讼中止一段固定期间。在该等中止期间或其他情况下，为促进信息交换并鼓励受托人与撤销诉讼被告之间进行富有成效的谈判，Tancredi 法官可安排包括多名撤销诉讼被告和/或某些类别撤销诉讼被告的信息会议和/或调解会议。如 Tancredi 法官建议中止任何撤销诉讼和/或撤销诉讼类别，受托人应在该等建议作出后七（7）日内，促使在该等诉讼中提交有关通知。经举行听证，任何受该等建议中止影响的撤销诉讼被告可在通知提交后七（7）日内，于其撤销诉讼中提交书面答复。经就 Tancredi 法官的建议及任何及时提交的书面答复举行听证后，无需提交动议，本院可就 Tancredi 法官提出的任何建议作出进一步命令，包括但不限于在一对一调解前中止任何撤销诉讼或撤销诉讼类别。\n\nz. 尽管《撤销诉讼程序》中有任何相反规定，经受托人或任何其他利害关系方请求，或依本院另行命令（包括但不限于根据 Tancredi 法官提出的建议），在依任何适用规则仅于主案中发出通知并提交动议后，本院可修改本调解程序；但经批准后，经修订的调解程序应提交至所有撤销诉讼中。\n\n3. 本命令登记后七（7）日内，受托人应在本命令登记时尚未结案的所有撤销诉讼中提交《撤销诉讼程序通知》（采用随附本命令作为附件 1 的经修订格式）。\n\n4. 本命令及《撤销诉讼程序》规定的期间，应依《破产程序规则》9006(a)计算。\n\n5. 如《撤销诉状》（或其附件）中的信息可能受《1974 年隐私法》5 U.S.C. § 552a, et al.规制，本命令构成有管辖权法院的命令，授权依 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) 和 12 C.F.R § 310.10(b)，向任何撤销诉讼被告及其律师披露该等信息。本命令亦修订《保护令》及 P.O. 附录，以准许受托人在《撤销诉讼程序》规定的范围内，向任何撤销诉讼被告披露在针对该被告提交的《撤销诉状》中、依据《保护令》或 P.O. 附录被指定为高度保密的信息。\n\n6. 根据 District of Connecticut Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5(e)（康涅狄格联邦地区法院民事诉讼地方法则第 5(e) 条）、District of Connecticut Local Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9077-1（康涅狄格联邦地区法院破产程序地方法则第 9077-1 条）、《破产程序规则》9018 及《破产法典》第 107(b) 条，本命令构成本院命令，授权在《调解程序》允许的范围内密封提交撤销诉状及寻求批准和解的动议。\n\n7. 本院保留对因执行本命令而产生或与之相关的所有事项的管辖权。\n\n8. 本命令自登记时立即生效。\n\n附件 1\n\n（撤销诉讼程序适用性通知表格）\n\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\nx\n\n关于：\n：\n第 11 章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等人：\n：\nCase No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。\n：\n（合并管理）\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第 11 章\n受托人，\n原告，\n诉\nx\n\nAdv. Proceeding No. [\n]\n\n[NAME OF DEFENDANT]（[被告名称]）：\n被告。\n\nx\n\n撤销诉讼程序适用性通知\n\n请注意，上述标题所示第 11 章案件中由破产法院登记的《批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序之程序的修订命令》[ECF No. ___]，作为附件 A 随附于此，现适用于并管辖本对抗程序。\n\n1 本第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为：Paul Hastings LLP（博钦律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，c/o Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 遗产的受托人（仅供通知及通信之用）。\n\n日期：__________ __, 2024　New Haven, Connecticut（康涅狄格州纽黑文）\n\n签署人：____________________________\n\nPatrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛）（ct29437）\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩及蒙蒂思专业公司）\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n及\n\nNicholas A. Bassett（尼古拉斯·A·巴西特）（获准 pro hac vice 出庭）\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP（博钦律师事务所）\n2050 M Street NW\nWashington, D.C., 20036\n(202) 551-1902\nnicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n及\n\nAvram E. Luft（阿夫拉姆·E·卢夫特）（获准 pro hac vice 出庭）\nDouglass Barron（道格拉斯·巴伦）（获准 pro hac vice 出庭）\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP（博钦律师事务所）\n200 Park Avenue\nNew York, New York 10166\n(212) 318-6079\naviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n第 11 章受托人代理律师\n\n附件 2\n\n（适用于合并提交文件的抬头）\n\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等人，\n债务人。　x\n：\n第 11 章\n：\n：\nCase No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n：\n：\n（合并管理）\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第 11 章\n受托人，\n原告，　x\nAdv. Proc. Nos. 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n：\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n：\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\n：\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n：\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\n：\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n诉\n撤销诉讼被告：\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\n：\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n：\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\n：\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n：\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\n被告。\n\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n：\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nx\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX,\n24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-XXXX, 24-\nXXXX, 24-XXXX, and 24-XXXX\n\n1 本第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为：Paul Hastings LLP（博钦律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，c/o Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 遗产的受托人（仅供通知及通信之用）。\n\n附件 3-A\n\n（须中止的撤销诉讼）\n\n对抗程序编号　首位列名被告\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05008　Boardwalk Motor Imports LLC（木板路汽车进口有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05009　Mercantile Bank International（商业国际银行）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05012　Ogier（奥吉尔）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05014　Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP（皮尔斯伯里温思罗普肖皮特曼律师事务所）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05017　Post Oak Motor Cars LLC（邮橡汽车有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05020　Slaughter Law Group PC（斯劳特律师集团专业公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05022　FAM United LLC（FAM 联合有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05026　Yieldesta LP（Yieldesta 有限合伙企业）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05029　Great Bowery Inc dba Camilla Lowther Management（大鲍厄里公司，以 Camilla Lowther Management 名义营业）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05030　Vision Knight Capital (China) Fund（愿景骑士资本（中国）基金）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05032　Hugga LLC（Hugga 有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05037　Triple2 Digital（Triple2 数字公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05038　D4.Zero（D4.Zero）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05041　CFG Global Limited（CFG 环球有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05043　Loro Piana（洛罗·皮亚娜）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05045　The Quinlan Law Firm LLC（昆兰律师事务所有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05046　Janco SRL（扬科有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05050　Oro Mont Alpi SRL（奥罗蒙特阿尔皮有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05051　Mindy Wechsler（明迪·韦克斯勒）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05052　MF19 Inc（MF19 公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05056　FFP (BVI) Limited（FFP（英属维尔京群岛）有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05068　Caribe Condado LLC（加勒比孔达多有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05080　Reinhard Plank SRL（莱因哈德·普朗克有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05083　UK Import Services Limited（英国进口服务有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05084　Tavares Cutting Inc（塔瓦雷斯切割公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05087　Mosaicon Shoes SRL（莫赛康鞋业有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05088　Tokyoseiki Co LTD（东京精机有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05089　Pellettieri Di Parma SRL（帕尔马佩莱蒂耶里有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05091　Shalom B LLC dba Asher Fabric Concepts（Shalom B 有限责任公司，以 Asher Fabric Concepts 名义营业）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05094　Solazzo Calzature SRL（索拉佐鞋业有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05095　SOD Stone Offroad Design GmbH（SOD 石材越野设计有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05096　1245 Factory Place LLC（1245 Factory Place 有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05097　Liapull S.R.L.（Liapull 有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05098　Shing Seung Ankerite Engineering Ltd（成胜安克里特工程有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05099　American Arbitration Association（美国仲裁协会）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05104　Ice24 SRO（Ice24 SRO）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05106　REACH MFG（REACH 制造）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05111　DNM Beauty Distribution（DNM 美妆经销）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05113　1322089 BC Ltd（1322089 BC 有限公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05116　Hilton Management LLC（希尔顿管理有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05118　J Tan Jewelry Design Inc（J Tan 珠宝设计公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05121　Shaylen Music LLC（Shaylen 音乐有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05123　Bestview1 Pty Ltd（Bestview1 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05124　Legends OWO LLC（Legends OWO 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05127　Waycap SPA（Waycap 股份公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05129　Fay Ye（叶菲）\n对抗程序案号 24-05131　Lawrence River（劳伦斯·里弗）\n对抗程序案号 24-05136　ASAP SRL（ASAP 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05137　Bellerive Attorneys at Law（Bellerive 律师事务所）\n对抗程序案号 24-05139　Houston Litstar LLC（休斯敦 Litstar 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05140　Quinones Law PLLC（Quinones 法律专业有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05142　Immobiliara Barbara 2000 SRL（Immobiliara Barbara 2000 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05143　Dream Projects LLC（梦想项目有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05146　Fortnum Information Security Limited（Fortnum 信息安全有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05148　Galaxy Ltd（银河有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05150　Jialin Qin（秦嘉林）\n对抗程序案号 24-05151　Li Sho Yo（李绍耀）\n对抗程序案号 24-05153　Ming Ni（倪明）\n对抗程序案号 24-05155　Hayashi Meiou（林美樱）\n对抗程序案号 24-05156　12476517 Canada Society（12476517 加拿大协会）\n对抗程序案号 24-05157　DP Textile & Apparel Inc（DP 纺织与服装公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05160　LA International Foundation（洛杉矶国际基金会）\n对抗程序案号 24-05164　National Sweepstakes Company LLC（全国抽奖公司有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05165　Oxford Visionary Ltd（牛津远见有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05166　Chris Lee（李克里斯）\n对抗程序案号 24-05169　D&D Solutions LLC（D&D 解决方案有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05170　The Gertz File Investigative Reporting Project Inc（Gertz 文件调查报道项目公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05173　Wenhua Gong（龚文华）\n对抗程序案号 24-05174　SGB Packaging（SGB 包装）\n对抗程序案号 24-05176　Luminescence Co Ltd（发光有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05177　Xiaobo He（何小波）\n对抗程序案号 24-05180　Richmond Strategic Advisor（里士满战略顾问）\n对抗程序案号 24-05183　Reverence Capital Partners Opportunities Fund I\n（Cayman）LP（Reverence 资本合伙人机会基金 I（开曼）有限合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05191　Deng Qian（钱登）\n对抗程序案号 24-05193　Fiesta Investments Ltd（Fiesta 投资有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05195　Shujuan Milne（米尔恩淑娟）\n对抗程序案号 24-05197　Great Lakes Drone Company（五大湖无人机公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05198　G-Service LLC（G-Service 有限责任公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05205　Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC（Marini Pietrantoni Muniz 有限责任公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05210　Jiayao Gan（甘嘉瑶）\n对抗程序案号 24-05212　Michael Li and Co（Michael Li 及公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05213　GPS McQuhae LLP（GPS McQuhae 有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05215　Bradley Staple，dba Staples Building Solutions（Bradley Staple，以 Staples Building Solutions 名义营业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05217　Haisong Peng（彭海松）\n对抗程序案号 24-05218　Hou Yuan Chan（陈厚元）\n对抗程序案号 24-05224　OSC Orbit Services Company LLC（OSC Orbit 服务公司有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05227　Tao Zheng（郑涛）\n对抗程序案号 24-05230　Cayuse Government Services（Cayuse 政府服务）\n对抗程序案号 24-05231　9 East 40th Street（东40街9号）\n对抗程序案号 24-05232　Daihao Zhou（周代豪）\n对抗程序案号 24-05233　Brune Law PC（Brune 律师事务所）\n对抗程序案号 24-05234　Lyzon Enterprises Corporation（Lyzon 企业公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05235　Halley Chen CPA Professional Corporation（Halley Chen 注册会计师专业公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05236　Feng Yi（易峰）\n对抗程序案号 24-05237　Qiang Hu（胡强）\n对抗程序案号 24-05239　Jianhai Jiao（焦建海）\n对抗程序案号 24-05240　Fengjie Ma（马凤杰）\n对抗程序案号 24-05241　MZC Financial Inc（MZC 金融公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05242　Cotton Craft Textiles Intl Trading（Cotton Craft 纺织品国际贸易）\n对抗程序案号 24-05243　Ihotry Ltd（Ihotry 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05244　Quick-Equip LLC（Quick-Equip 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05245　RM Auctions Deutschland GmbH，et al.（RM Auctions Deutschland 有限责任公司等）\n对抗程序案号 24-05246　WA & HF LLC（WA & HF 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05248　Curiosity Corp，et al.（Curiosity 公司等）\n对抗程序案号 24-05250　Scarabaeus Wealth Management AG（Scarabaeus 财富管理股份公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05251　LLC Stz Fund No. 1（Stz Fund No. 1 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05252　Gettr USA Inc（Gettr USA 公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05253　Ivy Capital Advisor Limited（Ivy 资本顾问有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05254　NAV Consulting Inc（NAV 咨询公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05255　Ziba Limited（Ziba 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05256　New Mulberry PTE Ltd（New Mulberry 私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05257　Mishcon de Reya LLP（Mishcon de Reya 有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05258　Hogan Lovells International LLP（Hogan Lovells International 有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05259　Top Target General Trading LLC（Top Target 综合贸易有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05260　GCP Investment Advisors SL（GCP 投资顾问有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05261　Starling（Starling）\n对抗程序案号 24-05262　Red Team Partners（红队合伙人）\n对抗程序案号 24-05264　Smaragdos Mamzeris（Smaragdos Mamzeris）\n对抗程序案号 24-05265　Siu Ming Je（谢少明）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05266　Gong Jianfen（龚建芬）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05267　Khaled Ashafy（Khaled Ashafy）\n对抗程序案号 24-05268　Pure Global Group Limited（Pure Global 集团有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc，et al.（Himalaya Australia Athena Farm 公司等）\n对抗程序案号 24-05272　Hayman Hong Kong Opportunities（Hayman 香港机会）\n对抗程序案号 24-05274　Kin Ming Je（谢健明）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Lamp Capital LLC，et al.（Lamp Capital 有限责任公司等）\n\n附件 3-B\n\n（受部分中止影响的撤销诉讼）\n\n对抗程序案号　首位列名被告\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05006　AWS（Amazon Web Services，亚马逊网络服务）\n对抗程序案号 24-05007　Blueberry Builders（蓝莓建筑商）\n对抗程序案号 24-05011　E.L.J.M. Consulting LLC（E.L.J.M. 咨询有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05016　Imperius International Trad Co Ltd（Imperius 国际贸易有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05019　Mary Fashion SPA（Mary Fashion 股份公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05021　Bannon Strategic Advisors Inc（Bannon 战略顾问公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05023　Studio Cataldi Group SRL（Studio Cataldi 集团有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05024　TT Resources 1 Pty Ltd（TT Resources 1 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05028　Yuqiang Qin & Yunfu Jiang（秦玉强和江云富）\n对抗程序案号 24-05044　Teris（Teris）\n对抗程序案号 24-05054　Style Eyes Inc. d/b/a Ginger Finds（Style Eyes 公司，以 Ginger Finds 名义营业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05056　FFP (BVI) Limited（FFP（BVI）有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Amazon Inc（亚马逊公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05058　Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield（Anthem 蓝十字蓝盾）\n对抗程序案号 24-05059　Federal Express（联邦快递）\n对抗程序案号 24-05060　Apple Inc（苹果公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05065　A.Z. Bigiotterie S.A.S. DI Zanutto Gabriele & C.（A.Z. Bigiotterie S.A.S. DI Zanutto Gabriele & C.）\n对抗程序案号 24-05069　B&H Photo（B&H 摄影）\n对抗程序案号 24-05075　Marcella Monica Falciani（Marcella Monica Falciani）\n对抗程序案号 24-05077　American Express（美国运通）\n对抗程序案号 24-05081　Victor-Oasis Consultancy Limited（Victor-Oasis 咨询有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05090　Swans Team Design Inc（Swans Team Design 公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05093　2 B Packing LLC（2 B 包装有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05102　Ocorian Consulting Ltd（Ocorian 咨询有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05105　N87 Inc（N87 公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05109　Moran Yacht Management Inc（Moran 游艇管理公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05115　Cloudflare（Cloudflare）\n对抗程序案号 24-05122　Indium Software Inc（Indium 软件公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05125　Rilievi Group SRL（Rilievi 集团有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05133　Beile Li（李贝乐）\n对抗程序案号 24-05134　V.X. Cerda & Associates PA（V.X. Cerda & Associates 专业协会）\n对抗程序案号 24-05135　Liberty Jet Management（Liberty 喷气机管理）\n对抗程序案号 24-05145　Manhattan Motorcars Inc（曼哈顿汽车公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05152　Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP（Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders 有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05154　Kamel Debeche（Kamel Debeche）\n对抗程序案号 24-05159　Gold Leaf Consulting Limited（Gold Leaf 咨询有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05161　Mandelli USA Inc（Mandelli USA 公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05163　Harcus Parker Limited（Harcus Parker 有限公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05172　Federal Corporation (Japan)（Federal Corporation（日本））\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05175　Lau Lai Chun Annie（刘丽珍 Annie）\n对抗程序案号 24-05178　Super Star Project Limited（超级明星项目有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05179　Rising Sun Capital Ltd（旭日资本有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05188　Berkeley Rowe Ltd（Berkeley Rowe 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05188　Weddle Law PLLC（Weddle 法律专业有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05189　TD Avenue (The Diamond Avenue)（TD Avenue（钻石大道））\n对抗程序案号 24-05199　Lawall & Mitchell LLC（Lawall & Mitchell 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05203　Oasis Tech Limited（Oasis Tech 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05204　G4S Security Systems (Hong Kong) Ltd（G4S 安全系统（香港）有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05206　Hao Haidong（郝海东）\n对抗程序案号 24-05221　Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC（Gypsy Mei 食品服务有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05223　G-Translators Pty Ltd（G-Translators 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05225　Cirrus Design Corporation（Cirrus Design 公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05226　ACASS Canada Ltd（ACASS Canada 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05238　Qiang Guo（郭强）\n对抗程序案号 24-05248　Tut Co Limited（Tut Co 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05263　BSA Strategic Fund I，et al.（BSA 战略基金 I 等）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Weihua Li，et al.（李卫华等）\n\n附件 4\n\n（未自动适用调解移交的撤销诉讼被告名单）\n\n- 1. ACA Capital Limited（ACA资本有限公司）\n- 2. Anton Development Limited（安东发展有限公司）\n- 3. Bannon Strategic Advisors, Inc.（班农战略顾问公司）\n- 4. Barnett, Scott（斯科特·巴尼特）\n- 5. Berkeley Rowe Limited（伯克利·罗有限责任公司）\n- 6. BSA Strategic Fund（BSA战略基金）\n- 7. BSA Strategic Fund I（BSA战略基金I）\n- 8. Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC（奇耶萨·沙希尼安及贾恩托马西专业公司）\n- 9. China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd.（中国金泉集团（香港）有限公司）\n- 10. Debeche, Kamel（卡梅尔·德贝什）\n- 11. DiBattista, Anthony（安东尼·迪巴蒂斯塔）\n- 12. Enriquez, Bernardo（贝尔纳多·恩里克斯）\n- 13. Federal Corporation（联邦公司）\n- 14. Fiesta Investment Ltd. f/k/a Fiesta Property Developments Ltd.（嘉年华投资有限公司，前称嘉年华物业开发有限公司）\n- 15. G Club Holdco I LLC（G俱乐部控股I有限责任公司）\n- 16. G Club International Limited（G俱乐部国际有限公司）\n- 17. G Club Operations LLC（G俱乐部运营有限责任公司）\n- 18. G Club Three（G俱乐部三）\n- 19. G Fashion（G时尚）\n- 20. G Fashion International Limited（G时尚国际有限公司）\n- 21. G Fashion Media Group Inc.（G时尚媒体集团公司）\n- 22. Gettr USA, Inc.（Gettr美国公司）\n- 23. GF Italy, LLC（GF意大利有限责任公司）\n- 24. GFNY Inc.（GFNY公司）\n- 25. Gold Leaf Consulting Limited（金叶咨询有限公司）\n- 26. Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC（金门喜马拉雅农场有限责任公司）\n- 27. Golden Spring (New York) Limited（金泉（纽约）有限公司）\n- 28. Greenwich Land LLC（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）\n- 29. GS Security Solutions Inc.（GS安全解决方案公司）\n- 30. G-Service LLC（G服务有限责任公司）\n- 31. G-Translators Pty Ltd（G翻译公司）\n- 32. Guo, Mei（郭梅）\n- 33. Guo, Qiang（郭强）\n- 34. Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC（吉普赛梅食品服务有限责任公司）\n- 35. HAA Group Pty Ltd（HAA集团有限公司）\n- 36. Hadjicharalambous, Alex（亚历克斯·哈吉查拉兰布斯）\n- 37. Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）\n- 38. Hamilton Investment Management Ltd（汉密尔顿投资管理有限公司）\n- 39. Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC（汉密尔顿机会基金SPC）\n- 40. Han, Chunguang（韩春光）\n- 41. Harcus Parker Limited（哈克斯·帕克有限公司）\n- 42. HCHK Property Management Inc.（HCHK物业管理公司）\n- 43. HCHK Technologies Inc.（HCHK科技公司）\n\n45. Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd.（喜马拉雅澳大利亚有限公司）46. Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC（喜马拉雅波士顿五月花有限责任公司）47. Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.（喜马拉雅货币清算有限公司）48. Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）49. Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd（喜马拉雅国际金融集团有限公司）50. Himalaya International Reserves Ltd（喜马拉雅国际储备有限公司）51. Himalaya New World Inc.（喜马拉雅新世界公司）52. Himalaya New York Rock（喜马拉雅纽约岩）53. Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC（喜马拉雅上海农场有限责任公司）54. Himalaya UK Club（喜马拉雅英国俱乐部）55. Himalaya Worldwide LS（喜马拉雅全球LS）56. HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd.（HML温哥华帆船农场有限公司）57. Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）58. Hudson Diamond NY LLC（哈德逊钻石纽约有限责任公司）59. Je, Kin Ming（金明·谢）60. Krasner, Max（马克斯·克拉斯纳）61. Lamp Capital LLC（蓝普资本有限责任公司）62. Lawall & Mitchell, LLC（劳沃尔及米切尔有限责任公司）63. Leading Shine NY Limited（纽约领耀有限公司）64. Lee, Chris（克里斯·李）65. Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.（列克星敦物业及人力配置公司）66. Miller, Jason（杰森·米勒）67. Mitchell, Aaron（亚伦·米切尔）68. MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc.（MOS喜马拉雅基金会公司）69. Mountains of Spices Inc.（香料山公司）70. Ngok, Hing Chi（吴庆志）71. O.S.C. Orbit II Service Company LLC（O.S.C.轨道II服务公司有限责任公司）72. Omicron Nutraceutical LLC（奥密克戎营养保健品有限责任公司）73. OSC Orbit Service Company LLC（OSC轨道服务公司有限责任公司）74. Oxford Visionary Ltd.（牛津远见有限公司）75. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP（皮尔斯伯里·温思罗普·肖·皮特曼律师事务所）76. Rising Sun Capital Ltd.（旭日资本有限公司）77. Rong, Sin Ting（荣新婷）78. Rosy Acme Ventures Limited（蔷薇顶峰创投有限公司）79. Rule of Law III Foundation Inc.（法治III基金会公司）80. Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会IV公司）81. Saraca Media Group, Inc.（萨拉卡媒体集团公司）82. Taurus Fund LLC（金牛基金有限责任公司）83. The Francis Firm PLLC（弗朗西斯律师事务所专业有限责任公司）84. Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP（特劳特曼·佩珀·汉密尔顿·桑德斯律师事务所）85. UK Himalaya Ltd.（英国喜马拉雅有限公司）86. V.X. Cerda & Associates P.A.（V.X.塞尔达及合伙人专业协会）\n\n44. Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.（喜马拉雅澳大利亚雅典娜农场公司）\n\n87. Wang, Yanping（王艳萍）\n\n- 88. Warroom Broadcasting & Media Communications LLC（战情室广播及媒体传播有限责任公司）\n- 89. Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C.（蔡斯勒及蔡斯勒专业公司）\n\n90. Zhang, Yongbing（张永兵）\n\n- 91. ZYB & Associates, LLC, d/b/a Law Offices of Yongbing Zhang（ZYB及合伙人有限责任公司，以张永兵律师事务所名义经营）\n- 92. 任何受法院作出的约定中止时效命令约束的潜在撤销被告。\n附件B\n\nWeddle Law（韦德尔律师事务所）对拟议修订程序命令4月10日版本的异议及建议修订\n\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院布里奇波特分庭）\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　：\n：\n第11章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，　：\n：\n案号：22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。1　：\n：\n合并管理\n：\n---------------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n[修订拟议] 批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序之程序的修订命令\n\n根据Luc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯平斯）以其作为在郭文贵（下称“债务人”）第11章案件中获任命的第11章受托人（下称“受托人”）的身份所提出的动议（下称“本动议”）2，请求依据《美国法典》第11编（下称“破产法”）第105(a)及363条、《联邦破产程序规则》（下称“破产规则”）第7016、7026及9006条，以及《康涅狄格州地区破产程序地方法规则》（下称“地方法破产规则”）第7016-1条，作出一项命令（下称“本命令”），以修改本法院《关于批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序之程序的命令》[ECF No. 2578]（下称“撤销程序命令”），并据此修改撤销之诉程序，以纳入某些规范撤销之诉调解的程序；且本法院根据28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334及United States District Court for the District of Connecticut（美国康涅狄格州联邦地区法院）的移送常设命令，对审理本动议及其中请求的救济具有管辖权；且对本动议及其中请求的救济的审理属于28 U.S.C. § 157(b)规定的核心程序；且根据28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409，本法院为适当审判地；且本法院已认定，本动议所请求的救济符合债务人第11章破产财产、其债权人及所有利害关系方的最佳利益；且鉴于具体情形，已就本动议作出适当且充分的通知；且看来无需作出其他或进一步通知；且基于本法院进行的一切程序，包括于2024年4月23日举行的听证会；且对于本命令所请求救济的任何异议均已撤回或经实体审理后驳回；且经审慎审议并认定存在充分理由，现命令如下：\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为郭文贵（亦称Guo Wengui、Miles Guo和Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司）（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及Genever Holdings Corporation（杰尼弗控股公司）。受托人、杰尼弗控股有限责任公司及杰尼弗控股公司的邮寄地址为：Paul Hastings LLP（普衡律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，c/o 卢克·A·德斯平斯，作为郭文贵破产财产的受托人（仅供通知及通信之用）。\n\n2 本命令中使用但未另行定义的首字母大写术语，具有本动议中赋予其的含义。\n\n其中所请求的救济属于28 U.S.C. § 157(b)规定的核心程序；且根据28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409，本法院为适当审判地；且本法院已认定，本动议所请求的救济符合债务人第11章破产财产、其债权人及所有利害关系方的最佳利益；且鉴于具体情形，已就本动议作出适当且充分的通知；且看来无需作出其他或进一步通知；且基于本法院进行的一切程序，包括于2024年4月23日举行的听证会；且对于本命令所请求救济的任何异议均已撤回或经实体审理后驳回；且经审慎审议并认定存在充分理由，现命令如下：\n\n1. 本动议按本命令所述予以准许。\n\n2. 本法院现命令，下列经修订的撤销之诉程序应适用于撤销之诉：\n\na. 撤销之诉程序应适用于受托人于2024年2月1日或之后提起的任何对抗程序，在该等程序中，受托人仅依据破产法第544、547、548、549及550条主张请求权（下称“撤销之诉”）。\n\nb. 在提交提起任何撤销之诉的起诉状（下称“撤销起诉状”）时，受托人应提交一份实质上采用本命令附件1所附格式的《撤销之诉程序适用通知》（下称“撤销之诉程序通知”）。受托人应根据破产规则第7004条，连同传票及撤销起诉状，向每一撤销之诉中的被告（下称“撤销被告”）送达撤销之诉程序通知副本。\n\nc. 影响多个撤销之诉的动议，应在每一适用的撤销之诉中提交，并应使用实质上采用本命令附件2所附格式的标题栏。\n\nd. 如撤销起诉状（包括附件）包含根据《保护令》[主案件 ECF No. 923]（下称“保护令”）及《保护令约定补充条款》[主案件 ECF No. 2460]（下称“保护令补充条款”）被指定为保密或高度保密的信息，受托人可将该撤销起诉状密封提交（下称“密封撤销起诉状”）；但受托人应以非密封方式提交一份遮盖任何被指定为保密或高度保密信息的撤销起诉状副本（下称“经遮盖撤销起诉状”）。送达经遮盖撤销起诉状，即构成破产规则第7004条所要求的充分起诉状送达。尽管保护令及保护令补充条款中有任何相反规定，在任何撤销被告及其律师各自签署保护令附件A副本，以及如适用，保护令补充条款附件A副本后，受托人可向该撤销被告提供未遮盖撤销起诉状副本。\n\ne. 撤销被告对任何撤销起诉状作出答复的期限（下称“答复日期”）应为向该撤销被告完成送达之日起六十（60）日；但未经本法院进一步命令，受托人与任何撤销被告可约定将被告的答复日期进一步延长最多九十（90）日。任何该等约定均应以书面形式作出，并提交至适用对抗程序的案卷。尽管本命令中有任何相反规定：\n\ni. 本命令附件3-A所列撤销之诉（下称“暂停审理的撤销之诉”）应暂停审理，直至本法院作出进一步命令。在解除暂停审理的撤销之诉的暂停审理时，本法院应决定暂停审理的撤销之诉是否应受调解程序约束，并确定该等诉讼中的撤销被告答复撤销起诉状的期限。\n\nii. 本命令附件3-B所列撤销之诉（下称“部分暂停审理的撤销之诉”）应暂停审理，直至本法院作出进一步命令，但仅限于与以下法律或事实问题有关的范围：ACA Capital Group Ltd（ACA资本集团有限公司）、Anton Development Limited、G Club International Limited、G Club Operations LLC、G Fashion、G Fashion Media Group Inc.、GFNY Inc.、Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd、Himalaya International Clearing Ltd、Leading Shine NY Ltd（纽约领耀有限公司）、Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.、Rule of Law Society IV Inc.及Saraca Media Group Inc.是否为债务人的另我实体，及／或该等实体的财产是否为债务人及／或债务人第11章破产财产的财产（统称“暂停审理事项”）；但双方可就依据《联邦民事诉讼规则》第12条提出的驳回动议进行诉讼，且本法院应就该动议作出裁决；该规则经《联邦破产程序规则》第7012条在本案中适用，无论该驳回动议提出的事项是否已被暂停审理。为免生疑义，部分暂停审理的撤销之诉应就并非暂停审理事项的一切事项，在调解程序（定义见下文）规定的范围内进入调解；但暂停审理事项亦可在自愿基础上进行调解。[NTD：此处不明确。诉讼的哪些部分被暂停审理，哪些部分未被暂停审理？是基于转让人，还是基于破产法条款？需要具体列明适用对抗程序的哪些部分受此双轨制——暂停审理／不暂停审理——约束。]\n\niii. 在提交任何新的撤销之诉后，受托人可通过在相关撤销之诉中提交该等指定通知（下称“暂停指定通知”），将该诉讼指定为暂停审理的撤销之诉或部分暂停审理的撤销之诉。任何拟对暂停指定通知提出异议的撤销被告，应于在同一案件中出庭之日起七（7）日内，在相关撤销之诉中提交对该通知的答复；受托人可于该答复提交之日起十四（14）日内作出回复。任何有关暂停指定通知的争议，应由本法院在通知及听证后裁定。\n\nf. 如任何撤销被告通过提交依据《联邦民事诉讼规则》第12(b)条提出的动议答复撤销起诉状，受托人应有六十（60）日对该动议作出答复。如受托人对该动议作出答复，撤销之诉被告应有四十五（45）日提交对受托人反对意见的回复。\n\ng. 除非法院另有命令，在任何撤销诉讼中，依据《破产程序规则》7016，证据开示前将不举行首次审前会议；因此，法院书记员签发并由受托人送达的传票将不包括审前会议日期。在撤销诉讼的一方当事人认为为处理排期或其他问题有必要举行审前会议的范围内，任何一方当事人均可随时通过在该撤销诉讼的案卷中提交申请，请求举行该等会议。\n\nh. 在答复日期（Response Date）后尽快，各方当事人应依据《民事规则》26(f)进行协商（“首次案件会议”），此后，各方当事人应提交一份共同拟议的排期命令，规定证据开示、简易判决及其他审前程序，但须经法院批准。如法院不批准该共同拟议的排期命令，法院应安排审前会议以确定排期命令。如各方当事人未能就共同拟议的排期命令达成一致，各方当事人应请求举行审前会议以确定排期命令。在排期命令作出前，任何一方不得在撤销诉讼中提出证据开示请求。\n\ni. 撤销诉讼的任何一方当事人，如有充分理由，均可请求就该撤销诉讼修改撤销诉讼程序。该等修改应通过在适用的撤销诉讼中提交动议提出请求。\n\nj. 尽管本文件有任何相反规定，撤销诉讼程序应受下列调解程序（“调解程序”）管辖；但调解程序仅适用于住所位于美国的被告，任何住所位于美国境外的被告，除非其自愿同意，否则不受调解程序约束；进一步规定，依照调解程序自愿参与调解，不构成接受管辖权，亦不构成放弃任何主张或抗辩，包括基于送达充分性、审判地和管辖权的任何主张或抗辩：如任何撤销被告在其就受托人的撤销起诉书作出答复的期限届满前，在撤销诉讼中出庭，则受托人在该撤销诉讼中针对该撤销被告的请求将自动（且无需进一步命令）移交至无约束力的调解程序（如下文所述，“调解程序”）（“调解移交”）；但任何调解移交均不得视为在 May 15, 2024 之前已经发生。发生调解移交后，该撤销诉讼就该撤销被告而言应中止；但该中止不适用于受托人依据《民事规则》12对任何动议作出答复的义务，亦不适用于撤销诉讼被告就受托人提交的任何反对意见提交答复的权利（包括但不限于该撤销被告对撤销起诉书作出答复的义务），直至调解程序结束。[NTD：交叉引用实行双轨诉讼/调解的部分中止撤销诉讼和未中止撤销诉讼] 如撤销被告在其对撤销起诉书作出答复的期限届满后才在撤销诉讼中出庭，除非受托人与该撤销被告在撤销诉讼中提交书面约定，或法院作出命令，否则不得发生调解移交。为免生疑，任何撤销诉讼就某一特定撤销被告的中止，不应中止该撤销诉讼就任何其他撤销被告的程序；任何特定撤销诉讼中针对某一撤销被告的中止，亦不应中止受托人在该撤销诉讼之外针对该撤销被告提出的任何其他请求（无论是在其他撤销诉讼中还是其他情形下）。尽管本文件有任何相反规定，受托人针对所附附件4所列撤销被告提出的任何请求，均不应受调解移交约束，除非受托人与该撤销被告达成约定，或法院作出命令。\n\nk. United States Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi（美国破产法院法官James J. Tancredi，“Tancredi法官”）应监督所有调解程序；但调解应由Tancredi法官主持，或者，如Tancredi法官在与受托人及撤销诉讼被告协商后认定设立该等调解员小组将有利，则由经批准的撤销诉讼调解员小组（“调解员小组”）中的调解员主持。任何调解员小组的成员应由Tancredi法官选定；Tancredi法官可听取受托人和撤销诉讼被告的推荐，但每名该等调解员的任命以及适用于其的报酬费率，均须经法院批准。该等批准仅应由受托人通过在主案件中提交动议的方式请求，并在通知及听证后，依照《破产程序规则》2002和9013及适用的地方法院破产规则办理，且仅向所有撤销被告送达；调解员获任命加入调解员小组，应于法院批准后生效。任何关于任命调解员加入调解员小组的请求，均应附有该调解员的宣誓声明，声明该调解员并不持有或代表任何与破产财产或任何撤销被告存在利益冲突的一方的利益，并且在其他方面属于11 U.S.C. § 101(14)所称的“无利害关系人”。拟任调解员的声明还应披露其与受托人及其律师的所有关联关系。\n\nl. 在任何调解移交后的十四（14）日内，受托人与相关撤销被告应通过提交给Tancredi法官法庭助理的信函，共同联系Tancredi法官；该法庭助理为提交信函和安排调解之目的的联系方式，应于调解移交后提供给受托人和相关撤销诉讼被告。该信函应简要（且不作争辩性陈述）说明争议中的请求（以及可能的反请求和抗辩），并说明其在其后六十（60）日内参与调解的可用时间，以及调解会议应当亲自举行还是通过视频会议举行。收到该信函后，Tancredi法官应指定由其本人或由调解员小组成员（“指定调解员”）对该撤销诉讼进行调解，并应指示调解以亲自举行或视频会议方式进行。Tancredi法官可命令合并相关调解程序（包括在适当情况下，在单一撤销诉讼中针对多名被告提出请求的情形）。\n\nm. 或者，任何认为针对其提出的请求不应接受调解的撤销被告，可在调解移交后的十四（14）日内，通过向法院提交通知的方式提交选择退出调解的动议，载明将针对其提出的请求排除在调解程序之外的充分理由，并通知受托人和Tancredi法官其不希望参与调解。如被告希望在较晚时间参与调解，各方当事人可通知Tancredi法官和法院其希望进行调解。法院对该动议作出裁定前，不得就该撤销被告进行任何调解程序。如法院准许该动议，调解程序应视为立即终止，撤销被告应于该终止后的三十（30）日内对受托人的撤销起诉书作出答复。如法院驳回该动议，受托人和撤销被告应于该驳回后的十四（14）日内，依照前述l段规定的程序，通过信函联系Tancredi法官，以取得指定调解员。\n\nn. 在获通知其被指定后，指定调解员应有机会确定其与撤销被告之间是否存在任何利益冲突；如存在利益冲突，其可回避在该特定调解中履职；但该等回避可由撤销诉讼被告在通知法院后予以放弃。如指定调解员回避，Tancredi法官应从调解员小组中指定另一名调解员，或指定其本人主持调解。如调解程序的一方当事人认为利益冲突妨碍指定调解员履职，该方当事人可通过经其法庭助理提交给Tancredi法官的信函（副本送交对方当事人和指定调解员），或通过向法院提交动议，请求指定不同的指定调解员；但该等救济仅可在一方当事人发现寻求该等救济的依据后七（7）日内请求。\n\no. 指定调解员获指定后，受托人和撤销被告应就首次调解会议的日期与指定调解员协商。指定调解员应安排调解在获指定后的六十（60）日内进行；但经各方当事人和指定调解员同意，调解会议可安排在较晚日期举行，但该日期须在本文件¶ (t)规定的完成调解程序期限内。如调解将亲自举行，指定调解员还应选择调解地点；但除非各方当事人和指定调解员另有约定，任何亲自举行的调解仅应在Connecticut District（康涅狄格地区）或纽约市都会区内的下列地点举行：(i) 受托人律师的办公室，(ii) United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut（美国康涅狄格地区破产法院）的设施，或(iii) 指定调解员的办公室。指定调解员应至少提前二十一（21）日，就调解的首次日期、时间和地点提供书面通知（“调解通知”）；指定调解员应促使该调解通知在相关撤销诉讼中提交备案。\n\np. 经各方当事人在任何已安排的调解会议至少七（7）日前同意，指定调解员可自行决定重新安排该调解会议。如受托人或相关撤销被告在未获对方或指定调解员同意的情况下，或在调解会议前七（7）日内，寻求重新安排调解会议，该请求应通过其法庭助理以信函形式提交给Tancredi法官；对方和/或指定调解员亦应通过其法庭助理以信函形式向Tancredi法官提交任何答复。Tancredi法官随后将确定是否应重新安排调解会议；如该调解会议原定于请求之日起不足七（7）日内举行，还将确定指定调解员是否有权获得报酬，以及哪一方或哪些方应对此负责。\n\nq. 与调解程序有关的一切程序和书面材料均应视为享有特权并予以保密，受 Federal Rule of Evidence 408（《联邦证据规则》第408条）的一切保护，且不得因任何理由予以报道或作为证据采纳，但为证明某一方未遵守调解程序规则者除外。除本款规定外，任何一方均不得传唤任何指派调解员或 Tancredi 法官作为证人。任何一方均不得试图强制指派调解员（包括其代理人、合伙人或其各自律师事务所或组织的雇员）或 Tancredi 法官作证，或强制其提交文件（但适用法律允许提交该等证言或文件，和/或该等提交本应根据 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure（《联邦民事诉讼规则》）的通常证据开示程序所要求的范围除外）；但是，经法院命令，任何一方可传唤指派调解员作为证人，并可在被指称某一方未遵守调解程序规则的程序中，强制其在有限范围内作证。除非法院另有命令，双方当事人向指派调解员提供的任何文件，均应在提交调解员报告后三十（30）日内销毁。\n\nr. 指派调解员应主持任何调解会议，并拥有充分权力决定当事方陈述的性质和顺序，且证据规则不适用。指派调解员可根据具体情形实施合理且切实可行的额外程序。受托人及作为调解程序当事方的任何撤销诉讼被告，可在其指派调解员认为适当的范围内，与其指派调解员进行单方沟通。受托人及其律师可就实施本调解程序规则、遴选调解员加入调解小组、撤销诉讼的分类和/或 Tancredi 法官向法院提出的任何建议，与 Tancredi 法官进行单方沟通。\n\ns. 任何调解程序的当事方均应按照指派调解员安排和主持的方式，秉持诚信并着眼于达成协商一致的解决方案参与该等程序。被告的具有完全和解权限的代表（以及如被告由律师代理，则其律师）以及受托人和/或受托人的律师（其必须获得受托人的和解授权）均应出席调解会议（亲自出席，或在获准时通过视频会议出席）。指派调解员可自行酌情要求当事方在调解前准备调解陈述；除非指派调解员另有指示，该等调解陈述不得与调解的另一方当事人共享。指派调解员可就调解陈述向当事方发出进一步指示。\n\nt. 指派调解员可在调解通知中，或在无需提交备案的单独通知中，要求当事方向指派调解员提供任何相关文件和证据材料、立场陈述和/或和解提议。指派调解员可自行酌情，在发出通知后（该通知无需在法院案卷中备案），延期调解，或将调解移至调解程序规则授权地点范围内的其他地点。应调解当事方的请求，或如指派调解员认定继续调解最符合当事方利益，指派调解员亦可在已开始的调解后继续安排额外会议；但是，除非本法院应 Tancredi 法官请求以命令延长调解期限，任何调解程序不得在调解移送后持续超过一百八十（180）日，该请求及命令应在相关撤销诉讼的案卷中备案。如在首次调解会议之外举行额外调解会议，指派调解员可自行酌情允许该等会议通过视频会议举行。\n\nu. 除非 Tancredi 法官或法院另有约定或命令，指派调解员的费用和成本（如有）（以下简称“调解费用”）应由任何调解程序的当事方平均支付，首次调解会议的调解费用应至迟于该会议预定日期前七（7）日支付。如证明支付该等金额构成困难（以书面形式提交，并通知任何调解程序的所有相对方），Tancredi 法官或法院可修改当事方就调解费用承担的责任；但是，该等救济应至少在任何该等调解费用到期支付前十四（14）日请求。调解费用应按照法院就任命调解小组成员所批准的费率确定。\n\nv. 调解结束后七（7）日内，指派调解员应在相关撤销诉讼中提交一份报告（以下简称“调解员报告”），说明调解程序当事方是否遵守调解程序规则，以及调解程序是否达成和解。[NTD：调解命令不得违反适用法律和规则而设立一项专门的行政制裁程序。如任何一方要求制裁，必须依照程序规则和法定规则请求该等制裁。] 调解员报告不得涉及调解讨论的实质内容。此外，如存在对调解程序规则的重大不遵守，指派调解员可在相关撤销诉讼中提交一份中期报告（以下简称“中期报告”），告知法院该等不遵守情形。如调解员报告或中期报告表明未遵守调解程序规则，法院可（无需任何一方提交动议）安排听证，以审议对未遵守方实施制裁是否适当。该等制裁可包括但不限于，责令未遵守方承担调解程序的费用和/或对方当事人的律师费。此外，如属故意、持续或严重的不遵守，法院可对未遵守调解程序规则的一方作出缺席判决或驳回裁定。此外，如任何调解程序当事方未诚信地试图安排或解决调解，对方当事方可向法院提交制裁动议。有关实施制裁的诉讼不应延迟调解的开始。\n\nw. 如调解员报告表明调解程序达成和解，且该和解须经法院批准[NTD：本案中的所有和解不都需要法院批准吗？如非如此，依据何在？]，受托人应在调解员报告出具后三十（30）日内提交动议，请求该等批准。如受托人认为公开披露和解条款将损害财产和/或将涉及商业敏感或其他保密信息，而公开披露该等信息将损害和解当事方，受托人可提交寻求该等批准的密封动议（查阅权限仅限于受托人、相关撤销诉讼被告、官方无担保债权人委员会和 United States Trustee（美国受托人））。如动议以密封方式提交，受托人应在公开案卷中提交一份动议副本，其中删节任何商业敏感或其他保密信息。\n\nx. 如调解员报告未表明受托人与撤销诉讼被告之间的请求已获完全和解，则对受托人撤销诉状作出答复的期限，应自提交调解员报告之日起，或自法院就任何驳回动议作出裁定之日起，以较晚者为准，为六十/三十（630）日。\n\ny. 调解小组成员（如有）应定期就其获指派的调解程序的状况与 Tancredi 法官协商。此外，为促进调解程序并尽量减轻 Tancredi 法官的负担，受托人应与 Tancredi 法官协商，努力制定并向 Tancredi 法官提出（并通知撤销诉讼被告）撤销诉讼请求的分类（无论按转让金额、转让时间、所涉替身实体或其他方式）。任何其他一方或多方也可向 Tancredi 法官提出撤销诉讼的分类，或对受托人提出的分类作出回应。Tancredi 法官所采纳的任何该等分类，对任何撤销诉讼中与请求或抗辩实体有关的撤销诉讼被告均不具有约束力。Tancredi 法官可就调解程序的进展以及 Tancredi 法官为促进撤销诉讼有效管理而提出的任何建议，向法院提交报告。该等报告应以书面形式出具，并在主案和适用的对抗程序案卷中备案。该等建议可包括但不限于，在启动一对一调解程序之前，暂停某些撤销诉讼和/或某些类别的撤销诉讼一段固定期间。在该等暂停期间或其他情况下，为促进信息交换并鼓励受托人与撤销诉讼被告之间进行富有成效的谈判，Tancredi 法官可安排包括多名撤销诉讼被告和/或某些类别撤销诉讼被告的信息会议和/或调解会议。为免疑义，选择退出调解的撤销诉讼被告无需出席任何该等会议。如 Tancredi 法官建议暂停任何撤销诉讼和/或任何类别的撤销诉讼，受托人应在该等建议出具后七（7）日内，促使在该等诉讼中提交该建议通知。经听证，但无需提交动议，在向撤销诉讼被告适当通知后，法院可作出进一步命令处理 Tancredi 法官提出的任何建议，包括但不限于在一对一调解之前暂停任何撤销诉讼或任何类别的撤销诉讼。\n\nz. 尽管撤销诉讼程序规则中有任何相反规定，本调解程序规则可经受托人或任何其他利害关系方请求，或由法院另行命令（包括但不限于根据 Tancredi 法官提出的建议），在仅于主案中发出通知并给予听证机会后，由法院修改；但是，经批准后的修订调解程序规则应在所有撤销诉讼中备案。\n\n3. 本命令作出后七（7）日内，受托人应在本命令作出时所有待决撤销诉讼中提交撤销诉讼程序通知（采用作为附件1附于本命令之后的修订格式）。\n\n4. 本命令及撤销诉讼程序规则规定的期间，应根据 Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a)（《破产程序规则》第9006(a)条）计算。\n\n5. 在《回避诉状》（或其附件）中的信息可能受《1974年隐私法》（Privacy Act of 1974）、5 U.S.C. § 552a 等的约束的范围内，本命令构成具有管辖权的法院作出的命令，根据5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11)和12 C.F.R § 310.10(b)，授权向任何回避被告及其律师披露该等信息。本命令还修订保护令和P.O.补充文件，以允许受托人在《回避诉讼程序》规定的范围内，向任何回避被告披露在针对该被告提交的《回避诉状》中、根据保护令或P.O.补充文件被指定为高度保密的信息，前提是：(i) 受托人应至少提前5个营业日向将该信息指定为高度保密的一方通知其拟与某一回避被告共享该信息的意图以及该回避被告的身份；(ii) 如有人提出异议，除非法院另有命令，受托人不得向回避被告提供该信息；以及(iii) 该高度保密信息的拟接收人已书面同意受保护令和P.O.补充文件约束，并已向向受托人提供该信息的一方提供该书面同意。\n\n6. 根据康涅狄格联邦地区法院（District of Connecticut）《地方民事诉讼规则》5(e)、康涅狄格联邦地区法院《地方破产程序规则》9077-1、《破产规则》9018及《破产法典》第107(b)条，本命令构成法院命令，授权在《调解程序》允许的范围内，以密封方式提交回避诉状及寻求批准和解的动议。\n\n7. 任何回避被告均可随时根据28 U.S.C. §158(d)请求地区法院撤回对本案或任何程序的移送管辖，且该请求，包括其书面陈述及裁决，不受本命令任何规定的中止。\n\n8. 为确保裁判程序和调解程序的完整性，签署人作为主持第11章案件及程序的法官，将不参与调解程序；调解小组成员及首席调解员亦不会向签署人提供任何有关当事人所持立场或调解程序实质内容的信息。调解程序将保持保密并与第11章案件及程序中争议事项和程序的裁判相分离，同时并行进行。\n\n7.9. 法院对因实施本命令而产生或与之相关的一切事项保留管辖权。\n\n8.10. 本命令自录入之日起立即生效。\n\n附件1\n\n（回避诉讼程序适用通知书格式）\n\n美国破产法院\n康涅狄格地区\n布里奇波特分庭\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　:\n:　第11章\n等，1\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），　:\n:　案件编号22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。　:\n:\n:　（合并管理）\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第11章\n受托人，\n诉　原告，　x\n\n:　对抗程序编号[\n]\n[被告名称]　:\n\n被告。　:\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n回避诉讼程序适用通知书\n\n特此通知，破产法院已在上述标题的第11章案件中录入《批准适用于回避请求对抗程序的修订程序命令》[ECF编号___]，该命令作为附件A附于本通知之后，现适用于并管辖本对抗程序。\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（亦称Guo Wengui（郭文贵）、Miles Guo（郭文贵）和Miles Kwok（郭文贵），以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC及Genever Holdings Corporation的邮寄地址为：Paul Hastings LLP，200 Park Avenue，New York，NY 10166，转交Luc A. Despins，作为Ho Wan Kwok遗产的受托人（仅用于通知和通信）。\n\n日期：__________ __，2024\n\n康涅狄格州纽黑文\n\n签署人：_________________________\n\nPatrick R. Linsey（ct29437）\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n以及\n\nNicholas A. Bassett\n（获准pro hac vice）\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP\n2050 M Street NW\nWashington, D.C., 20036\n(202) 551-1902\nnicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n以及\n\nAvram E. Luft\n（获准pro hac vice）\nDouglass Barron\n（获准pro hac vice）\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP\n200 Park Avenue\nNew York, New York 10166\n(212) 318-6079\naviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n第11章受托人代理律师\n\n附件2\n\n（适用于合并提交文件的抬头）\n\n美国破产法院\n康涅狄格地区\n布里奇波特分庭\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n:\n第11章\n关于：　:\n:\n案件编号22-50073 (JAM)\n等，1\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），　:\n\n（合并管理）\n债务人。　:\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n对抗程序编号24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A·德斯平斯），第11章　:\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\n受托人，　:\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\n原告，　:\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n诉　:\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\n\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\n\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n回避被告　:\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\n\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n被告。　:\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nx\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\nXXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、\n24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-XXXX、24-\n-----------------------------------------------------------　XXXX、24-XXXX和24-XXXX\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（亦称Guo Wengui（郭文贵）、Miles Guo（郭文贵）和Miles Kwok（郭文贵），以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC及Genever Holdings Corporation的邮寄地址为：Paul Hastings LLP，200 Park Avenue，New York，NY 10166，转交Luc A. Despins，作为Ho Wan Kwok遗产的受托人（仅用于通知和通信）。\n\n附件3-A\n\n（受中止约束的回避诉讼）\n\n对抗程序编号　首位列名被告\n\n对抗程序编号24-05008　Boardwalk Motor Imports LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05009　Mercantile Bank International\n对抗程序编号24-05012　Ogier\n对抗程序编号24-05014　Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP\n对抗程序编号24-05017　Post Oak Motor Cars LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05020　Slaughter Law Group PC\n对抗程序编号24-05022　FAM United LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05026　Yieldesta LP\n对抗程序编号24-05029　Great Bowery Inc dba Camilla Lowther Management\n对抗程序编号24-05030　Vision Knight Capital (China) Fund\n对抗程序编号24-05032　Hugga LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05037　Triple2 Digital\n对抗程序编号24-05038　D4.Zero\n对抗程序编号24-05041　CFG Global Limited\n对抗程序编号24-05043　Loro Piana\n对抗程序编号24-05045　The Quinlan Law Firm LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05046　Janco SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05050　Oro Mont Alpi SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05051　Mindy Wechsler\n对抗程序编号24-05052　MF19 Inc\n对抗程序编号24-05056　FFP (BVI) Limited\n对抗程序编号24-05068　Caribe Condado LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05080　Reinhard Plank SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05083　UK Import Services Limited\n对抗程序编号24-05084　Tavares Cutting Inc\n对抗程序编号24-05087　Mosaicon Shoes SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05088　Tokyoseiki Co LTD\n对抗程序编号24-05089　Pellettieri Di Parma SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05091　Shalom B LLC dba Asher Fabric Concepts\n对抗程序编号24-05094　Solazzo Calzature SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05095　SOD Stone O_road Design GmbH\n对抗程序编号24-05096　1245 Factory Place LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05097　Liapull S.R.L.\n对抗程序编号24-05098　Shing Seung Ankerite Engineering Ltd\n对抗程序编号24-05099　American Arbitration Association\n对抗程序编号24-05104　Ice24 SRO\n对抗程序编号24-05106　REACH MFG\n对抗程序编号24-05111　DNM Beauty Distribution\n\n对抗程序编号24-05113　1322089 BC Ltd\n\n对抗程序编号24-05116　Hilton Management LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05118　J Tan Jewelry Design Inc\n对抗程序编号24-05121　Shaylen Music LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05123　Bestview1 Pty Ltd\n对抗程序编号24-05124　Legends OWO LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05127　Waycap SPA\n对抗程序编号24-05129　Fay Ye\n对抗程序编号24-05131　Lawrence River\n对抗程序编号24-05136　ASAP SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05137　Bellerive Attorneys at Law\n对抗程序编号24-05139　Houston Litstar LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05140　Quinones Law PLLC\n对抗程序编号24-05142　Immobiliara Barbara 2000 SRL\n对抗程序编号24-05143　Dream Projects LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05146　Fortnum Information Security Limited\n对抗程序编号24-05148　Galaxy Ltd\n对抗程序编号24-05150　Jialin Qin（秦嘉琳）\n对抗程序编号24-05151　Li Sho Yo\n对抗程序编号24-05153　Ming Ni\n对抗程序编号24-05155　Hayashi Meiou\n对抗程序编号24-05156　12476517 Canada Society\n对抗程序编号24-05157　DP Textile & Apparel Inc\n对抗程序编号24-05160　LA International Foundation\n对抗程序编号24-05164　National Sweepstakes Company LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05165　Oxford Visionary Ltd\n对抗程序编号24-05166　Chris Lee\n对抗程序编号24-05169　D&D Solutions LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05170　The Gertz File Investigative Reporting Project Inc\n对抗程序编号24-05173　Wenhua Gong（龚文华）\n对抗程序编号24-05174　SGB Packaging\n对抗程序编号24-05176　Luminescence Co Ltd\n对抗程序编号24-05177　Xiaobo He（何晓波）\n对抗程序编号24-05180　Richmond Strategic Advisor\n对抗程序编号24-05183　Reverence Capital Partners Opportunities Fund I\n（Cayman）LP\n对抗程序编号24-05191　Deng Qian（钱邓）\n对抗程序编号24-05193　Fiesta Investments Ltd\n对抗程序编号24-05195　Shujuan Milne\n对抗程序编号24-05197　Great Lakes Drone Company\n对抗程序编号24-05198　G-Service LLC\n对抗程序编号24-05205　Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC\n\n对抗程序编号24-05210　Jiayao Gan\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05212　Michael Li and Co（迈克尔·李公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05213　GPS McQuhae LLP（GPS 麦克奎有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05215　Bradley Staple（布拉德利·斯泰普尔），以 Staples Building Solutions（斯泰普尔建筑解决方案）名义营业\n对抗程序案号 24-05217　Haisong Peng（彭海松）\n对抗程序案号 24-05218　Hou Yuan Chan（陈厚元）\n对抗程序案号 24-05224　OSC Orbit Services Company LLC（OSC 轨道服务公司有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05227　Tao Zheng（郑涛）\n对抗程序案号 24-05230　Cayuse Government Services（凯尤斯政府服务公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05231　9 East 40th Street（东40街9号）\n对抗程序案号 24-05232　Daihao Zhou（周代浩）\n对抗程序案号 24-05233　Brune Law PC（布鲁恩律师事务所）\n对抗程序案号 24-05234　Lyzon Enterprises Corporation（莱宗企业公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05235　Halley Chen CPA Professional Corporation（哈利·陈注册会计师专业公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05236　Feng Yi（易峰）\n对抗程序案号 24-05237　Qiang Hu（胡强）\n对抗程序案号 24-05239　Jianhai Jiao（焦建海）\n对抗程序案号 24-05240　Fengjie Ma（马凤杰）\n对抗程序案号 24-05241　MZC Financial Inc（MZC 金融公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05242　Cotton Craft Textiles Intl Trading（棉艺纺织品国际贸易）\n对抗程序案号 24-05243　Ihotry Ltd（Ihotry 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05244　Quick-Equip LLC（快装设备有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05245　RM Auctions Deutschland GmbH（RM 德国拍卖有限责任公司）等\n对抗程序案号 24-05246　WA & HF LLC（WA & HF 有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05248　Curiosity Corp（好奇公司）等\n对抗程序案号 24-05250　Scarabaeus Wealth Management AG（圣甲虫财富管理股份公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05251　LLC Stz Fund No. 1（STZ 1号基金有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05252　Gettr USA Inc（Gettr 美国公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05253　Ivy Capital Advisor Limited（常春藤资本顾问有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05254　NAV Consulting Inc（NAV 咨询公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05255　Ziba Limited（Ziba 有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05256　New Mulberry PTE Ltd（新桑树私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05257　Mishcon de Reya LLP（米什康·德雷亚有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05258　Hogan Lovells International LLP（霍金路伟国际有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05259　Top Target General Trading LLC（顶级目标综合贸易有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05260　GCP Investment Advisors SL（GCP 投资顾问有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05261　Starling（椋鸟）\n对抗程序案号 24-05262　Red Team Partners（红队合伙人）\n对抗程序案号 24-05264　Smaragdos Mamzeris（斯马拉格多斯·马姆泽里斯）\n对抗程序案号 24-05265　Siu Ming Je（谢少明）\n对抗程序案号 24-05266　Gong Jianfen（龚建芬）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05267　Khaled Ashafy（哈立德·阿沙菲）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05268　Pure Global Group Limited（纯全球集团有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc（喜马拉雅澳大利亚雅典娜农场公司）等\n对抗程序案号 24-05272　Hayman Hong Kong Opportunities（海曼香港机会）\n对抗程序案号 24-05274　Kin Ming Je（谢建明）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Lamp Capital LLC（灯资本有限责任公司）等\n\n附件 3-B\n\n（受部分中止约束的撤销权诉讼）\n\n对抗程序案号　　首名被告\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05006　AWS (Amazon Web Services)（AWS〔亚马逊网络服务〕）\n对抗程序案号 24-05007　Blueberry Builders（蓝莓建筑商）\n对抗程序案号 24-05011　E.L.J.M. Consulting LLC（E.L.J.M. 咨询有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05016　Imperius International Trad Co Ltd（帝国国际贸易有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05019　Mary Fashion SPA（玛丽时尚股份公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05021　Bannon Strategic Advisors Inc（班农战略顾问公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05023　Studio Cataldi Group SRL（卡塔尔迪工作室集团有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05024　TT Resources 1 Pty Ltd（TT 资源1号私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05028　Yuqiang Qin（秦玉强）及 Yunfu Jiang（蒋云富）\n对抗程序案号 24-05044　Teris（泰瑞斯）\n对抗程序案号 24-05054　Style Eyes Inc.（时尚之眼公司），以 Ginger Finds（姜发现）名义营业\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Amazon Inc（亚马逊公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05058　Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield（安森蓝十字蓝盾）\n对抗程序案号 24-05059　Federal Express（联邦快递）\n对抗程序案号 24-05060　Apple Inc（苹果公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05065　A.Z. Bigiotterie S.A.S. DI Zanutto Gabriele & C.（A.Z. Bigiotterie S.A.S.，由扎努托·加布里埃莱及其公司经营）\n对抗程序案号 24-05069　B&H Photo（B&H 摄影器材）\n对抗程序案号 24-05075　Marcella Monica Falciani（马尔切拉·莫尼卡·法尔恰尼）\n对抗程序案号 24-05077　American Express（美国运通）\n对抗程序案号 24-05081　Victor-Oasis Consultancy Limited（维克托—绿洲咨询有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05090　Swans Team Design Inc（天鹅团队设计公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05093　2 B Packing LLC（2 B 包装有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05102　Ocorian Consulting Ltd（奥科里安咨询有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05105　N87 Inc（N87 公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05109　Moran Yacht Management Inc（莫兰游艇管理公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05115　Cloudflare（云闪公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05122　Indium Software Inc（铟软件公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05125　Rilievi Group SRL（里列维集团有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05133　Beile Li（李贝乐）\n对抗程序案号 24-05134　V.X. Cerda & Associates PA（V.X. 塞尔达及合伙人专业协会）\n对抗程序案号 24-05135　Liberty Jet Management（自由喷气机管理公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05145　Manhattan Motorcars Inc（曼哈顿汽车公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05152　Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP（特劳特曼·佩珀·汉密尔顿·桑德斯有限责任合伙企业）\n对抗程序案号 24-05154　Kamel Debeche（卡迈勒·德贝什）\n对抗程序案号 24-05159　Gold Leaf Consulting Limited（金叶咨询有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05161　Mandelli USA Inc（曼代利美国公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05163　Harcus Parker Limited（哈克斯·帕克有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05172　Federal Corporation (Japan)（联邦公司〔日本〕）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05175　Lau Lai Chun Annie（刘丽珍·安妮）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05178　Super Star Project Limited（超级明星项目有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05179　Rising Sun Capital Ltd（旭日资本有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05188　Berkeley Rowe Ltd（伯克利·罗有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05188　Weddle Law PLLC（韦德尔律师事务所专业有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05189　TD Avenue (The Diamond Avenue)（TD 大道〔钻石大道〕）\n对抗程序案号 24-05199　Lawall & Mitchell LLC（劳沃尔与米切尔有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05203　Oasis Tech Limited（绿洲科技有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05204　G4S Security Systems (Hong Kong) Ltd（G4S 安保系统〔香港〕有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05206　Hao Haidong（郝海东）\n对抗程序案号 24-05221　Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC（吉普赛梅食品服务有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05223　G-Translators Pty Ltd（G 翻译员私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05225　Cirrus Design Corporation（卷云设计公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05226　ACASS Canada Ltd（ACASS 加拿大有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05238　Qiang Guo（郭强）\n对抗程序案号 24-05248　Tut Co Limited（图特有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05263　BSA Strategic Fund I（BSA 战略基金I）等\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Weihua Li（李维华）等\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3100 Filed 04/12/24 Entered 04/12/24 20:52:04 Page 66 of 69\n\n附件 4\n\n（未自动适用调解移送的撤销权诉讼被告名单）\n\n- 1. ACA Capital Limited（ACA 资本有限公司）\n- 2. Anton Development Limited（安东发展有限公司）\n- 3. Bannon Strategic Advisors, Inc.\n- 4. Barnett, Scott（斯科特·巴内特）\n- 5. Berkeley Rowe Limited\n- 6. BSA Strategic Fund（BSA 战略基金）\n- 7. BSA Strategic Fund I\n- 8. Chiesa Shahinian & Giantomasi PC（基耶萨·沙希尼安与贾恩托马西专业公司）\n- 9. China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd.（中国金泉集团〔香港〕有限公司）\n- 10. Debeche, Kamel\n- 11. DiBattista, Anthony（安东尼·迪巴蒂斯塔）\n- 12. Enriquez, Bernardo（贝尔纳多·恩里克斯）\n- 13. Federal Corporation（联邦公司）\n- 14. Fiesta Investment Ltd. f/k/a Fiesta Property Developments Ltd.（嘉年华投资有限公司，原名嘉年华地产开发有限公司）\n- 15. G Club Holdco I LLC（G 俱乐部控股I有限责任公司）\n- 16. G Club International Limited（G 俱乐部国际有限公司）\n- 17. G Club Operations LLC（G 俱乐部运营有限责任公司）\n- 18. G Club Three（G 俱乐部三号）\n- 19. G Fashion（G 时尚）\n- 20. G Fashion International Limited（G 时尚国际有限公司）\n- 21. G Fashion Media Group Inc.（G 时尚媒体集团公司）\n- 22. Gettr USA, Inc.\n- 23. GF Italy, LLC（GF 意大利有限责任公司）\n- 24. GFNY Inc.（GFNY 公司）\n- 25. Gold Leaf Consulting Limited\n- 26. Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC（金门喜马拉雅农场有限责任公司）\n- 27. Golden Spring (New York) Limited（金泉〔纽约〕有限公司）\n- 28. Greenwich Land LLC（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）\n- 29. GS Security Solutions Inc.（GS 安保解决方案公司）\n- 30. G-Service LLC（G 服务有限责任公司）\n- 31. G-Translators Pty Ltd\n- 32. Guo, Mei（郭梅）\n- 33. Guo, Qiang\n- 34. Gypsy Mei Food Services LLC\n- 35. HAA Group Pty Ltd（HAA 集团私人有限公司）\n- 36. Hadjicharalambous, Alex（亚历克斯·哈吉查兰布斯）\n- 37. Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）\n- 38. Hamilton Investment Management Ltd（汉密尔顿投资管理有限公司）\n- 39. Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC（汉密尔顿机会基金隔离投资组合公司）\n- 40. Han, Chunguang（韩春光）\n- 41. Harcus Parker Limited\n- 42. HCHK Property Management Inc.（HCHK 物业管理公司）\n- 43. HCHK Technologies Inc.（HCHK 科技公司）\n- 44. Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.\n- 45. Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd.（喜马拉雅澳大利亚私人有限公司）\n- 46. Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC（喜马拉雅波士顿五月花有限责任公司）\n- 47. Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.（喜马拉雅货币清算私人有限公司）\n- 48. Himalaya International Clearing Ltd.（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）\n- 49. Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd（喜马拉雅国际金融集团有限公司）\n- 50. Himalaya International Reserves Ltd（喜马拉雅国际储备有限公司）\n- 51. Himalaya New World Inc.（喜马拉雅新世界公司）\n- 52. Himalaya New York Rock（喜马拉雅纽约岩石）\n- 53. Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC（喜马拉雅上海农场有限责任公司）\n- 54. Himalaya UK Club（喜马拉雅英国俱乐部）\n- 55. Himalaya Worldwide LS（喜马拉雅全球LS）\n- 56. HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd.（HML 温哥华帆船农场有限公司）\n- 57. Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）\n- 58. Hudson Diamond NY LLC（哈德逊钻石纽约有限责任公司）\n- 59. Je, Kin Ming\n- 60. Krasner, Max（马克斯·克拉斯纳）\n- 61. Lamp Capital LLC\n- 62. Lawall & Mitchell, LLC\n- 63. Leading Shine NY Limited（领耀纽约有限公司）\n- 64. Lee, Chris（克里斯·李）\n- 65. Lexington Property and Staffing Inc.（列克星敦物业与人事公司）\n- 66. Miller, Jason（杰森·米勒）\n- 67. Mitchell, Aaron（亚伦·米切尔）\n- 68. MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc.（MOS 喜马拉雅基金会公司）\n- 69. Mountains of Spices Inc.（香料山公司）\n- 70. Ngok, Hing Chi（岳兴志）\n- 71. O.S.C. Orbit II Service Company LLC（O.S.C. 轨道II服务公司有限责任公司）\n- 72. Omicron Nutraceutical LLC（奥密克戎营养保健品有限责任公司）\n- 73. OSC Orbit Service Company LLC\n- 74. Oxford Visionary Ltd.（牛津远见有限公司）\n- 75. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP（皮尔斯伯里·温思罗普·肖·皮特曼有限责任合伙企业）\n- 76. Rising Sun Capital Ltd.\n- 77. Rong, Sin Ting（荣善婷）\n- 78. Rosy Acme Ventures Limited（罗西埃克米风险投资有限公司）\n- 79. Rule of Law III Foundation Inc.（法治III基金会公司）\n- 80. Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会IV公司）\n- 81. Saraca Media Group, Inc.（萨拉卡媒体集团公司）\n- 82. Taurus Fund LLC（金牛座基金有限责任公司）\n- 83. The Francis Firm PLLC（弗朗西斯律师事务所专业有限责任公司）\n- 84. Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP\n- 85. UK Himalaya Ltd.（英国喜马拉雅有限公司）\n- 86. V.X. Cerda & Associates P.A.\n- 87. Wang, Yanping（王燕平）\n- 88. Warroom Broadcasting & Media Communications LLC（战情室广播与媒体通信有限责任公司）\n- 89. Zeisler & Zeisler, P.C.（塞斯勒与塞斯勒专业公司）\n- 90. Zhang, Yongbing（张永兵）\n- 91. 任何受法院作出的约定中止时效命令约束的潜在撤销权诉讼被告。","key_entities":["Je","Himalaya","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Despins","Paul Hastings","CIPA","Miles Guo","HCHK","Saraca","GETTR","Kin Ming Je"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":923,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2460,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2578,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":20884,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-04-12 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-04-12","updated_at":"2026-08-23 22:11:56"}