{"id":"court_ctb_3464_1","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":3464,"sub_number":1,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2024-08-14","title":"EXHIBIT 1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT","summary_zh":"法院裁定附件 —— Ho Wan Kwok 破产案（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo），CTB 22-50073 ECF #3464-1（2024-08-14）。该附件为破产法院出具的裁定（ECF #3417），准许第 11 章受托人 Luc A. Despins 的第二次延期动议，将受托人提起撤销权诉讼（avoidance actions）及修改起诉状的法定期限延长至 2025 年 2 月 15 日。","summary_en":"Court Order Exhibit — In re Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui), CTB No. 22-50073, ECF No. 3464-1 (filed Aug. 14, 2024). This exhibit contains the Bankruptcy Court's order (ECF No. 3417) granting Chapter 11 Trustee Luc A. Despins's second motion for extension of deadlines, extending the statutory limitations periods under 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to commence avoidance actions and amend complaints to February 15, 2025.","body_en":"## **EXHIBIT 1**\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 1 of 4\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT**\n\nIn re:\n\n HO WAN KWOK, *et al.*, 1\n\nDebtors.\n\n Chapter 11 Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) (Jointly Administered)\n\nRe: ECF No. 3329\n\n## **ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR TRUSTEE TO FILE AVOIDANCE ACTIONS**\n\nOn February 15, 2024, the Court entered the Memorandum of Decision and Order Granting in Part Motion to Extend Deadlines (the \"First Extension Order\").<sup>2</sup> (ECF No. 2921.) After notice and an evidentiary hearing held on February 13, 2024 (the \"First Extension Hearing\"), the First Extension Order granted, for the reasons stated therein, the Motion for Entry of Order Extending Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"First Extension Motion\") (ECF No. 2509), filed by Mr. Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the Chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") for the bankruptcy estate of Mr. Ho Wan Kwok. The First Extension Order extended the statutes of limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 from February 15, 2024 – the two-year anniversary of the voluntary filing by Mr. Kwok of his Chapter 11 petition – to August 15, 2024.\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<sup>2</sup> The First Extension Order is incorporated herein by reference.\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 2 of 4\n\nOn July 19, 2024, the Trustee filed the First Supplemental Motion to Extend August 15, 2024 Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"Second Extension Motion\"). (ECF No. 3329.) On July 22, 2024, the Clerk of Court issued a Notice of Hearing, scheduling the Second Extension Motion for hearing on August 13, 2024, setting an objection deadline of August 6, 2024, and a reply deadline of August 9, 2024. (ECF No. 3332.) On July 25, 2024, the Trustee timely filed a certificate of service demonstrating service in accordance with a previously entered order limiting notice of the Second Extension Motion (the \"Order Limiting Notice\"). (ECF No. 3323).\n\nOn August 6, 2024, timely objections to the Second Extension Motion (the \"Objections\") were filed by Ms. Hing Chi Ngok, G Club Operations, LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., Apple Inc., FFP (BVI) Ltd., Ogier, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, and Weddle Law PC (the \"Objectors\"). (ECF Nos. 3373, 3374, 3375, 3376, 3379.) On August 9, 2024, the Trustee timely filed a reply (the \"Reply\"). (ECF No. 3391.) On August 12, 2024, the Trustee filed a list of witnesses and exhibits. (ECF No. 3395.)\n\nOn August 13, 2024, an evidentiary hearing was held (the \"Second Extension Hearing\"). The Trustee testified and was subject to cross-examination during the Second Extension Hearing, and the parties advanced their arguments. At the conclusion of the Second Extension Hearing, the Court took the Second Extension Motion under advisement.\n\nHaving considered: (i) the Second Extension Motion, the Objections, and the Reply; (ii) the testimony of the Trustee and the arguments of the parties during the Second Extension Hearing; (iii) the pleadings filed in relation to the First Extension Motion and the testimony of the Trustee and arguments of the parties during the First Extension Hearing; and (iv) matters of which the Court may take judicial notice, the Court finds, for the reasons stated in the First\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 3 of 4\n\nExtension Order, in the Second Extension Motion, during the Second Extension Hearing, and herein, that the Trustee has established cause exists under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) to grant the Second Extension Motion, which cause includes without limitation: (1) the pendency of the criminal action styled *United States v. Kwok*, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) from March 2023 through the date of the entry of this Order and its impact on these cases and the multitude of related adversary proceedings; (2) Mr. Kwok's ongoing contempt of court and failure to perform his statutory duties under 11 U.S.C. § 521; (3) other parties' ongoing contempt of court; (4) the complexity and extent of Mr. Kwok's financial affairs; and (5) the Trustee's diligence in his investigation. The Court is unpersuaded by the arguments of the Objectors to the contrary, including without limitation the arguments that: (a) despite the completely different procedural and factual context in *Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.*, 603 U.S. \\_\\_\\_, 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024), to which context the Supreme Court of the United States explicitly restricted its holding, the decision in that case mandates the denial of the Second Extension Motion; and (b) the facts and circumstances of these jointly administered Chapter 11 cases are, at this time, no longer extraordinary. While the Trustee will ultimately conclude his investigation, that time has not yet come. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006, it is hereby\n\n**ORDERED:** The Second Extension Motion (ECF No. 3329) is granted as set forth herein; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The time limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to commence avoidance actions and other actions on behalf of the estate, as well as for amending any pending complaints, are extended through and including February 15, 2025, which date may be further extended upon notice and a hearing; and it is further\n\n3\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 4 of 4\n\n**ORDERED:** The terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The Trustee is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief granted herein; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of this Order.\n\nDated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 14th day of August, 2024.\n\n![](_page_4_Picture_6.jpeg)","body_zh":"证物 1\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 1 of 4\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT（美国康涅狄格区破产法院）\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，1\n\n债务人。\n\n第 11 章案件编号 22-50073 (JAM)（合并审理）\n\n关于：ECF No. 3329\n准予受托人延长提起撤销权诉讼期限之第二次动议的裁定\n\n2024年2月15日，本院作出了《决定备忘录及部分准予延长诉讼期限动议的裁定》（以下简称“《第一次延期裁定》”）。2（ECF No. 2921。）在发出通知并于2024年2月13日举行证据听证会（以下简称“第一次延期听证会”）后，《第一次延期裁定》基于其中所述理由，准予了由 Ho Wan Kwok 破产财产的第 11 章受托人（以下简称“受托人”）Luc A. Despins 先生提交的《关于作出延长受托人提起撤销权诉讼期限之裁定的动议》（以下简称“《第一次延期动议》”）（ECF No. 2509）。《第一次延期裁定》将 11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的诉讼时效从2024年2月15日——即郭先生自愿提出第 11 章破产申请的两周年届满日——延长至2024年8月15日。\n\n1 这些第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（亦称郭文贵、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及诸多其他别名）（纳税人识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（纳税人识别号后四位：8202）和 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 和 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（普衡律师事务所）, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok（仅用于接收通知和联络之目的）。\n\n2 《第一次延期裁定》通过引用并入本裁定。\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 2 of 4\n\n2024年7月19日，受托人提交了《关于延长受托人提起撤销权诉讼的2024年8月15日截止期限的第一次补充动议》（以下简称“《第二次延期动议》”）。（ECF No. 3329。）2024年7月22日，法院书记官发出《听证通知》，将《第二次延期动议》的听证会定于2024年8月13日举行，并设定提出异议的截止日期为2024年8月6日，答辩截止日期为2024年8月9日。（ECF No. 3332。）2024年7月25日，受托人及时提交了送达证明，证明已按照此前作出的限制《第二次延期动议》通知范围的裁定（以下简称“《限制通知裁定》”）完成了送达。（ECF No. 3323）。\n\n2024年8月6日，Hing Chi Ngok（岳庆芝）女士、G Club Operations, LLC、Meta Platforms, Inc.、Apple Inc.（苹果公司）、FFP (BVI) Ltd.、Ogier（奥杰律师事务所）、Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP（品斯宾律师事务所）以及 Weddle Law PC（以下统称“异议人”）及时提交了对《第二次延期动议》的异议（以下简称“《异议》”）。（ECF Nos. 3373, 3374, 3375, 3376, 3379。）2024年8月9日，受托人及时提交了答辩意见（以下简称“《答辩》”）。（ECF No. 3391。）2024年8月12日，受托人提交了证人及证物清单。（ECF No. 3395。）\n\n2024年8月13日，法院举行了证据听证会（以下简称“第二次延期听证会”）。受托人在第二次延期听证会上作证并接受了交叉询问，各方当事人陈述了各自的辩论意见。在第二次延期听证会结束时，本院宣布将审议后择期对《第二次延期动议》作出裁决。\n\n在审议了：(i)《第二次延期动议》、《异议》以及《答辩》；(ii) 受托人的证词以及各方当事人在第二次延期听证会上的辩论意见；(iii) 就《第一次延期动议》提交的诉状，以及受托人的证词和各方当事人在第一次延期听证会上的辩论意见；以及 (iv) 本院可依职权予以司法认知的事项之后，基于在第一次\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 3 of 4\n\n延期裁定中、《第二次延期动议》中、第二次延期听证会期间以及本裁定中阐述的理由，本院认定受托人已证明依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b)（《联邦破产诉讼程序规则》第 9006(b) 条）存在准予《第二次延期动议》的正当事由，该正当事由包括但不限于：(1) 自2023年3月起直至本裁定作出之日，案号为 United States v. Kwok, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) 的刑事诉讼一直处于未决状态，及其对本案及大量相关对抗性诉讼程序产生的影响；(2) 郭先生持续藐视法庭，且未能履行其在 11 U.S.C. § 521 项下的法定义务；(3) 其他当事人持续藐视法庭；(4) 郭先生财务状况的复杂性及广度；以及 (5) 受托人在其调查中的勤勉尽责。异议人提出的相反主张未能说服本院，这些主张包括但不限于：(a) 尽管 Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 603 U.S. \\_\\_\\_, 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024) 一案在程序和事实背景上完全不同，且 Supreme Court of the United States（美国联邦最高法院）已明确将其判决限定于该特定背景，但该案的裁决仍要求驳回《第二次延期动议》；以及 (b) 这些合并审理的第 11 章案件的事实和情况在当前已不再属于特殊情况。受托人终将结束其调查，但目前这一时机尚未成熟。因此，依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006，特此\n\n裁定如下：《第二次延期动议》（ECF No. 3329）按本裁定所述予以准予；并且进一步\n\n裁定如下：11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的受托人代表破产财产提起撤销权诉讼及其他诉讼，以及修改任何未决起诉状的时效限制，延长至2025年2月15日（含该日），经发出通知并举行听证后，该日期可进一步延长；并且进一步\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 4 of 4\n\n裁定如下：本裁定的各项条款和条件在作出后立即生效并具有执行力；并且进一步\n\n裁定如下：受托人获授权采取一切必要行动以落实本裁定所准予的救济；并且进一步\n\n裁定如下：本院对因本裁定的解释或执行而产生或与之相关的一切事项保留管辖权。\n\n2024年8月14日订于康涅狄格州布里奇波特。","key_entities":["Kwok","Je","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Despins","Miles Guo","Paul Hastings"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":2509,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2921,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3323,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3329,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3332,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3391,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3395,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3417,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":1057,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-08-14 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-08-14","updated_at":"2026-08-23 12:41:34"}