{"id":"court_ctb_3470_2","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":3470,"sub_number":2,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2024-08-14","title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT In re:","summary_zh":"法院裁定附件 —— Ho Wan Kwok 破产案（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo），CTB 22-50073 ECF #3470-2（2024-08-14）。该附件为破产法院出具的裁定书（ECF #3417），正式批准受托人的第二次延期动议，将依据美国破产法第 108、546 及 549 条提起撤销权诉讼的期限延至 2025 年 2 月 15 日。","summary_en":"Court Order Exhibit — In re Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui), CTB No. 22-50073, ECF No. 3470-2 (filed Aug. 14, 2024). This exhibit comprises the Bankruptcy Court's order (ECF No. 3417) granting the Chapter 11 Trustee's second extension motion, extending the estate's statutory deadlines under 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 to initiate avoidance actions through February 15, 2025.","body_en":"Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 1 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 1 of 4\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT**\n\nIn re:\n\n HO WAN KWOK, *et al.*, 1\n\nDebtors.\n\n Chapter 11 Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) (Jointly Administered)\n\nRe: ECF No. 3329\n\n## **ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR TRUSTEE TO FILE AVOIDANCE ACTIONS**\n\nOn February 15, 2024, the Court entered the Memorandum of Decision and Order Granting in Part Motion to Extend Deadlines (the \"First Extension Order\").<sup>2</sup> (ECF No. 2921.) After notice and an evidentiary hearing held on February 13, 2024 (the \"First Extension Hearing\"), the First Extension Order granted, for the reasons stated therein, the Motion for Entry of Order Extending Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"First Extension Motion\") (ECF No. 2509), filed by Mr. Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the Chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") for the bankruptcy estate of Mr. Ho Wan Kwok. The First Extension Order extended the statutes of limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 from February 15, 2024 – the two-year anniversary of the voluntary filing by Mr. Kwok of his Chapter 11 petition – to August 15, 2024.\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<sup>2</sup> The First Extension Order is incorporated herein by reference.\n\n## Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 2 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 2 of 4\n\nOn July 19, 2024, the Trustee filed the First Supplemental Motion to Extend August 15, 2024 Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"Second Extension Motion\"). (ECF No. 3329.) On July 22, 2024, the Clerk of Court issued a Notice of Hearing, scheduling the Second Extension Motion for hearing on August 13, 2024, setting an objection deadline of August 6, 2024, and a reply deadline of August 9, 2024. (ECF No. 3332.) On July 25, 2024, the Trustee timely filed a certificate of service demonstrating service in accordance with a previously entered order limiting notice of the Second Extension Motion (the \"Order Limiting Notice\"). (ECF No. 3323).\n\nOn August 6, 2024, timely objections to the Second Extension Motion (the \"Objections\") were filed by Ms. Hing Chi Ngok, G Club Operations, LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., Apple Inc., FFP (BVI) Ltd., Ogier, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, and Weddle Law PC (the \"Objectors\"). (ECF Nos. 3373, 3374, 3375, 3376, 3379.) On August 9, 2024, the Trustee timely filed a reply (the \"Reply\"). (ECF No. 3391.) On August 12, 2024, the Trustee filed a list of witnesses and exhibits. (ECF No. 3395.)\n\nOn August 13, 2024, an evidentiary hearing was held (the \"Second Extension Hearing\"). The Trustee testified and was subject to cross-examination during the Second Extension Hearing, and the parties advanced their arguments. At the conclusion of the Second Extension Hearing, the Court took the Second Extension Motion under advisement.\n\nHaving considered: (i) the Second Extension Motion, the Objections, and the Reply; (ii) the testimony of the Trustee and the arguments of the parties during the Second Extension Hearing; (iii) the pleadings filed in relation to the First Extension Motion and the testimony of the Trustee and arguments of the parties during the First Extension Hearing; and (iv) matters of which the Court may take judicial notice, the Court finds, for the reasons stated in the First\n\n## Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 3 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 3 of 4\n\nExtension Order, in the Second Extension Motion, during the Second Extension Hearing, and herein, that the Trustee has established cause exists under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) to grant the Second Extension Motion, which cause includes without limitation: (1) the pendency of the criminal action styled *United States v. Kwok*, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) from March 2023 through the date of the entry of this Order and its impact on these cases and the multitude of related adversary proceedings; (2) Mr. Kwok's ongoing contempt of court and failure to perform his statutory duties under 11 U.S.C. § 521; (3) other parties' ongoing contempt of court; (4) the complexity and extent of Mr. Kwok's financial affairs; and (5) the Trustee's diligence in his investigation. The Court is unpersuaded by the arguments of the Objectors to the contrary, including without limitation the arguments that: (a) despite the completely different procedural and factual context in *Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.*, 603 U.S. \\_\\_\\_, 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024), to which context the Supreme Court of the United States explicitly restricted its holding, the decision in that case mandates the denial of the Second Extension Motion; and (b) the facts and circumstances of these jointly administered Chapter 11 cases are, at this time, no longer extraordinary. While the Trustee will ultimately conclude his investigation, that time has not yet come. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006, it is hereby\n\n**ORDERED:** The Second Extension Motion (ECF No. 3329) is granted as set forth herein; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The time limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to commence avoidance actions and other actions on behalf of the estate, as well as for amending any pending complaints, are extended through and including February 15, 2025, which date may be further extended upon notice and a hearing; and it is further\n\n3\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 4 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 4 of 4\n\n**ORDERED:** The terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and\n\nenforceable upon its entry; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The Trustee is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the\n\nrelief granted herein; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of this Order.\n\nDated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 14th day of August, 2024.\n\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)","body_zh":"Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 1 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 1 of 4\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT（美国康涅狄格区破产法院）\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，1\n\n债务人。\n\n第11章破产案号 22-50073 (JAM)（合并审理）\n\n涉及：ECF No. 3329\n准予受托人延长提起撤销权之诉期限之第二次动议的裁定\n\n2024年2月15日，法院作出了《关于部分准予延长最后期限动议的决定备忘录和裁定》（下称“第一次延期裁定”）。2（ECF No. 2921。）在发出通知并于2024年2月13日举行证据听证会（下称“第一次延期听证会”）后，基于其中阐述的理由，第一次延期裁定准予了由Luc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯平斯）先生以Ho Wan Kwok先生破产财产的第11章受托人（下称“受托人”）身份提交的《关于作出延长受托人提起撤销权之诉期限之裁定的动议》（下称“第一次延期动议”）（ECF No. 2509）。第一次延期裁定将11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546和549中规定的诉讼时效从2024年2月15日——即郭先生自愿提交其第11章申请两周年之日——延长至2024年8月15日。\n\n1 这些第11章案件中的债务人包括Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，又名Guo Wengui、Miles Guo、Miles Kwok以及众多其他化名）（纳税人识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（纳税人识别号后四位：8202）和Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC和Genever Holdings Corporation的邮寄地址为Paul Hastings LLP（普衡律师事务所）, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins，作为Ho Wan Kwok财产的受托人（仅用于接收通知和通信之目的）。\n\n2 第一次延期裁定通过引用并入本裁定。\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 2 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 2 of 4\n\n2024年7月19日，受托人提交了《关于延长受托人提起撤销权之诉之2024年8月15日最后期限的第一次补充动议》（下称“第二次延期动议”）。（ECF No. 3329。）2024年7月22日，法院书记官发出《听证通知》，定于2024年8月13日就第二次延期动议举行听证会，并将提出异议的最后期限设定为2024年8月6日，答辩的最后期限设定为2024年8月9日。（ECF No. 3332。）2024年7月25日，受托人及时提交了送达证明，证明已按照此前作出的限制第二次延期动议通知范围的裁定（下称“限制通知裁定”）进行了送达。（ECF No. 3323）。\n\n2024年8月6日，Hing Chi Ngok（岳庆芝）女士、G Club Operations, LLC、Meta Platforms, Inc.、Apple Inc.（苹果公司）、FFP (BVI) Ltd.、Ogier（奥杰律师事务所）、Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP（毕马威沙普律师事务所）以及Weddle Law PC（下称“异议人”）就第二次延期动议及时提交了异议（下称“异议”）。（ECF Nos. 3373、3374、3375、3376、3379。）2024年8月9日，受托人及时提交了答辩（下称“答辩”）。（ECF No. 3391。）2024年8月12日，受托人提交了证人与证据清单。（ECF No. 3395。）\n\n2024年8月13日，法院举行了证据听证会（下称“第二次延期听证会”）。受托人在第二次延期听证会期间作证并接受了交叉盘问，各方当事人阐述了各自的论点。在第二次延期听证会结束时，法院宣布对第二次延期动议进行斟酌审议。\n\n在审议了：(i) 第二次延期动议、异议及答辩；(ii) 受托人在第二次延期听证会期间的证词及各方当事人的论点；(iii) 就第一次延期动议提交的诉答文书以及受托人在第一次延期听证会期间的证词和各方当事人的论点；以及 (iv) 法院可依职权予以司法认知的事项后，基于在第一\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 3 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 3 of 4\n\n次延期裁定中、在第二次延期动议中、在第二次延期听证会期间以及在本裁定中阐述的理由，法院认定受托人已证明依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) 存在准予第二次延期动议的正当理由，该正当理由包括但不限于：(1) 自2023年3月至本裁定作出之日期间，案号为 United States v. Kwok, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) 的刑事诉讼案件的未决状态及其对这些案件和大量相关对抗性程序的影响；(2) 郭先生持续藐视法庭以及未能履行其依据 11 U.S.C. § 521 承担的法定义务；(3) 其他当事人持续藐视法庭；(4) 郭先生财务事务的复杂性和广泛性；以及 (5) 受托人在其调查中的勤勉尽责。法院对异议人提出的相反主张不予采纳，包括但不限于以下主张：(a) 尽管 Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 603 U.S. \\_\\_\\_, 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024) 一案具有完全不同的程序和事实背景，且 Supreme Court of the United States（美国最高法院）已明确将其判决限定在该背景之下，但该案的判决仍要求驳回第二次延期动议；以及 (b) 这些合并审理的第11章案件的事实和情况在目前已不再具有特殊性。受托人最终会结束其调查，但目前这一时机尚未成熟。因此，依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006，特此\n\n裁定：第二次延期动议（ECF No. 3329）按本裁定所载内容予以准予；并进一步\n\n裁定：11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546和549中规定的受托人代表破产财产提起撤销权之诉及其他诉讼，以及修改任何未决起诉书的时限，延长至并包括2025年2月15日，该日期在发出通知并举行听证后可进一步延长；并进一步\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 4 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3470-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:12:45 Page 4 of 4\n\n裁定：本裁定的条款和条件应在其作出后立即生效并\n\n具有可执行性；并进一步\n\n裁定：受托人获授权采取一切必要行动以实现\n\n本裁定所准予的救济；并进一步\n\n裁定：本法院对于因本裁定的解释或执行引起的或与之相关的所有事项保留管辖权。\n\n2024年8月14日于康涅狄格州布里奇波特签署。","key_entities":["Kwok","Je","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Despins","Miles Guo","Paul Hastings"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":2509,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2921,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3323,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3329,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3332,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3391,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3395,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3417,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":1108,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-08-14 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-08-14","updated_at":"2026-08-23 12:43:16"}