{"id":"court_ctb_3474_2","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":3474,"sub_number":2,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2024-08-14","title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT In re:","summary_zh":"法院裁定附件 —— Ho Wan Kwok 破产案（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo），CTB 22-50073 ECF #3474-2（2024-08-14）。该附件为破产法院裁定（ECF #3417）副本，批准第 11 章受托人的第二次延期动议，将受托人提起撤销权诉讼的法定期限延长至 2025 年 2 月 15 日。","summary_en":"Court Order Exhibit — In re Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui), CTB No. 22-50073, ECF No. 3474-2 (filed Aug. 14, 2024). This exhibit provides a copy of the Bankruptcy Court's order (ECF No. 3417) granting the Chapter 11 Trustee's second extension motion and extending the time limitations for commencing avoidance actions to February 15, 2025.","body_en":"Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 1 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 1 of 4\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT**\n\nIn re:\n\n HO WAN KWOK, *et al.*, 1\n\nDebtors.\n\n Chapter 11 Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) (Jointly Administered)\n\nRe: ECF No. 3329\n\n## **ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR TRUSTEE TO FILE AVOIDANCE ACTIONS**\n\nOn February 15, 2024, the Court entered the Memorandum of Decision and Order Granting in Part Motion to Extend Deadlines (the \"First Extension Order\").<sup>2</sup> (ECF No. 2921.) After notice and an evidentiary hearing held on February 13, 2024 (the \"First Extension Hearing\"), the First Extension Order granted, for the reasons stated therein, the Motion for Entry of Order Extending Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"First Extension Motion\") (ECF No. 2509), filed by Mr. Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the Chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") for the bankruptcy estate of Mr. Ho Wan Kwok. The First Extension Order extended the statutes of limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 from February 15, 2024 – the two-year anniversary of the voluntary filing by Mr. Kwok of his Chapter 11 petition – to August 15, 2024.\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<sup>2</sup> The First Extension Order is incorporated herein by reference.\n\n## Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 2 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 2 of 4\n\nOn July 19, 2024, the Trustee filed the First Supplemental Motion to Extend August 15, 2024 Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"Second Extension Motion\"). (ECF No. 3329.) On July 22, 2024, the Clerk of Court issued a Notice of Hearing, scheduling the Second Extension Motion for hearing on August 13, 2024, setting an objection deadline of August 6, 2024, and a reply deadline of August 9, 2024. (ECF No. 3332.) On July 25, 2024, the Trustee timely filed a certificate of service demonstrating service in accordance with a previously entered order limiting notice of the Second Extension Motion (the \"Order Limiting Notice\"). (ECF No. 3323).\n\nOn August 6, 2024, timely objections to the Second Extension Motion (the \"Objections\") were filed by Ms. Hing Chi Ngok, G Club Operations, LLC, Meta Platforms, Inc., Apple Inc., FFP (BVI) Ltd., Ogier, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, and Weddle Law PC (the \"Objectors\"). (ECF Nos. 3373, 3374, 3375, 3376, 3379.) On August 9, 2024, the Trustee timely filed a reply (the \"Reply\"). (ECF No. 3391.) On August 12, 2024, the Trustee filed a list of witnesses and exhibits. (ECF No. 3395.)\n\nOn August 13, 2024, an evidentiary hearing was held (the \"Second Extension Hearing\"). The Trustee testified and was subject to cross-examination during the Second Extension Hearing, and the parties advanced their arguments. At the conclusion of the Second Extension Hearing, the Court took the Second Extension Motion under advisement.\n\nHaving considered: (i) the Second Extension Motion, the Objections, and the Reply; (ii) the testimony of the Trustee and the arguments of the parties during the Second Extension Hearing; (iii) the pleadings filed in relation to the First Extension Motion and the testimony of the Trustee and arguments of the parties during the First Extension Hearing; and (iv) matters of which the Court may take judicial notice, the Court finds, for the reasons stated in the First\n\n## Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 3 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 3 of 4\n\nExtension Order, in the Second Extension Motion, during the Second Extension Hearing, and herein, that the Trustee has established cause exists under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) to grant the Second Extension Motion, which cause includes without limitation: (1) the pendency of the criminal action styled *United States v. Kwok*, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) from March 2023 through the date of the entry of this Order and its impact on these cases and the multitude of related adversary proceedings; (2) Mr. Kwok's ongoing contempt of court and failure to perform his statutory duties under 11 U.S.C. § 521; (3) other parties' ongoing contempt of court; (4) the complexity and extent of Mr. Kwok's financial affairs; and (5) the Trustee's diligence in his investigation. The Court is unpersuaded by the arguments of the Objectors to the contrary, including without limitation the arguments that: (a) despite the completely different procedural and factual context in *Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P.*, 603 U.S. \\_\\_\\_, 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024), to which context the Supreme Court of the United States explicitly restricted its holding, the decision in that case mandates the denial of the Second Extension Motion; and (b) the facts and circumstances of these jointly administered Chapter 11 cases are, at this time, no longer extraordinary. While the Trustee will ultimately conclude his investigation, that time has not yet come. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006, it is hereby\n\n**ORDERED:** The Second Extension Motion (ECF No. 3329) is granted as set forth herein; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The time limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to commence avoidance actions and other actions on behalf of the estate, as well as for amending any pending complaints, are extended through and including February 15, 2025, which date may be further extended upon notice and a hearing; and it is further\n\n3\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 4 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 4 of 4\n\n**ORDERED:** The terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and\n\nenforceable upon its entry; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The Trustee is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the\n\nrelief granted herein; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of this Order.\n\nDated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 14th day of August, 2024.","body_zh":"Case 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 1 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 1 of 4\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT（美国康涅狄格区联邦破产法院）\n\nIn re:（关于：）\n\nHO WAN KWOK, et al., 1（Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）等，1）\n\nDebtors.（债务人。）\n\nChapter 11 Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) (Jointly Administered)（第11章破产案号：22-50073 (JAM)（联合管理））\n\nRe: ECF No. 3329（关于：ECF 第 3329 号文件）\nORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR TRUSTEE TO FILE AVOIDANCE ACTIONS（关于准许受托人提起撤销权诉讼期限延期之第二次动议的裁定）\n\n2024年2月15日，本法院作出了《关于部分准许延长截止期限动议的决定备忘录及裁定》（“第一次延期裁定”）。2（ECF No. 2921。）经通知并于2024年2月13日举行证据听证会（“第一次延期听证会”）后，基于其中阐明的原因，第一次延期裁定准许了由 Luc A. Despins 先生以 Ho Wan Kwok 破产财产的第11章受托人（“受托人”）身份提起的《关于作出延长受托人提起撤销权诉讼期限之裁定的动议》（“第一次延期动议”）（ECF No. 2509）。第一次延期裁定将 11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的时效期限从2024年2月15日——即郭先生自愿提交第11章破产申请的两周年届满日——延长至2024年8月15日。\n\n1 本批第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（亦称郭文贵、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及其他众多化名）（纳税人识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（纳税人识别号后四位：8202）以及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok（仅用于通知与通讯目的）。\n\n2 第一次延期裁定通过援引纳入本裁定。\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 2 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 2 of 4\n\n2024年7月19日，受托人提交了《关于延长受托人提起撤销权诉讼2024年8月15日截止期限的第一次补充动议》（“第二次延期动议”）。（ECF No. 3329。）2024年7月22日，法院书记官发出《听证通知》，排定第二次延期动议于2024年8月13日举行听证，设定异议截止日期为2024年8月6日，答复截止日期为2024年8月9日。（ECF No. 3332。）2024年7月25日，受托人及时提交了送达证明，证明已按照先前作出的限制第二次延期动议通知范围的裁定（“限制通知裁定”）进行了送达。（ECF No. 3323）。\n\n2024年8月6日，Hing Chi Ngok 女士、G Club Operations, LLC、Meta Platforms, Inc.、Apple Inc.、FFP (BVI) Ltd.、Ogier、Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP 以及 Weddle Law PC（“异议人”）对第二次延期动议及时提交了异议（“异议”）。（ECF Nos. 3373, 3374, 3375, 3376, 3379。）2024年8月9日，受托人及时提交了答复（“答复”）。（ECF No. 3391。）2024年8月12日，受托人提交了证人及证据清单。（ECF No. 3395。）\n\n2024年8月13日，法院举行了证据听证会（“第二次延期听证会”）。受托人在第二次延期听证会期间出庭作证并接受了交叉询问，各方当事人陈述了各自的主张。在第二次延期听证会结束时，法院宣布对第二次延期动议进行斟酌审议。\n\n经审酌：(i) 第二次延期动议、异议及答复；(ii) 受托人的证言及各方当事人在第二次延期听证会期间的主张；(iii) 就第一次延期动议提交的诉答文书以及受托人的证言和各方当事人在第一次延期听证会期间的主张；以及 (iv) 法院可进行司法认知的各项事项，法院基于第一次\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 3 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 3 of 4\n\n延期裁定中、第二次延期动议中、第二次延期听证会期间以及本裁定中所述的理由，认定受托人已确立了依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) 准许第二次延期动议的正当理由，该正当理由包括但不限于：(1) 自2023年3月起直至本裁定作出之日，案号为 United States v. Kwok, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) 的刑事诉讼一直处于系属审理状态，及其对本批案件和大量相关对抗性程序的影响；(2) 郭先生持续藐视法庭且未能履行 11 U.S.C. § 521 规定的法定义务；(3) 其他当事人持续藐视法庭；(4) 郭先生财务事务的复杂性与广泛性；以及 (5) 受托人在其调查中的尽职勤勉。法院对异议人的相反主张不予采纳，包括但不限于以下主张：(a) 尽管 Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 603 U.S. ___, 144 S. Ct. 2071 (2024) 一案具有完全不同的程序和事实背景，且 Supreme Court of the United States（美国最高法院）明确将其裁判要旨限制于该特定背景，但该案的裁决仍强制要求驳回第二次延期动议；以及 (b) 这些联合管理的第11章案件的事实和情况在目前已不再具有特殊性。虽然受托人最终将结束其调查，但该时机尚未成熟。因此，依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006，特此\n\n裁定：第二次延期动议（ECF No. 3329）按本裁定所述予以准许；并进一步\n\n裁定：11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 中规定的受托人代表破产财产提起撤销权诉讼和其他诉讼以及修改任何未决诉状的时间限制，延长至2025年2月15日（含当日），经通知和听证该日期可进一步延长；并进一步\nCase 22-50073 Doc 3417 Filed 08/14/24 Entered 08/14/24 15:18:21 Page 4 of 4 Case 22-50073 Doc 3474-2 Filed 08/28/24 Entered 08/28/24 11:19:07 Page 4 of 4\n\n裁定：本裁定的各项条款和条件一经作出即刻生效并具有执行力；并进一步\n\n裁定：授权受托人采取一切必要行动以落实本裁定所准许的救济；并进一步\n\n裁定：本法院将对因本裁定的解释或执行而产生的或与之相关的一切事项保留管辖权。\n\n日期：2024年8月14日，于康涅狄格州布里奇波特。","key_entities":["Kwok","Je","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Despins","Miles Guo","Paul Hastings"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":2509,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2921,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3323,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3329,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3332,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3391,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3395,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3417,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":1107,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-08-14 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-08-14","updated_at":"2026-08-23 12:43:04"}