{"id":"court_ctb_404_17","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":404,"sub_number":17,"doc_type":"EXHIBIT","filed_date":"2022-05-20","title":"EXHIBIT PAX 17 April 26, 2019 Hearing Transcript, *PAX v. Kwok*, Index. No. 652077/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), Dkt. 331","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"# **EXHIBIT PAX 17**\n\nApril 26, 2019 Hearing Transcript, *PAX v. Kwok*, Index. No. 652077/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), Dkt. 331\n\n1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART: 61 2 -------------------------------------------------------x PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA, 3 Plaintiff, 4 -against-5 HO WAN KWOK, 6 Defendant. 7 --------------------------------------------~----------X Index No. 652077-2017 60 Centre Street 8 New York, New York April 26, 2019 9 10 B E FOR E: 11 HONORABLE BARRY R. OSTRAGER, Justice 12 13 APPEARANCES: 14 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Attorneys for the Plaintiff 15 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 16 BY: EDWARD MOSS, ESQ. STUART SARNOFF, ESQ.' 17 GARO HOPLAMAZIAN, ESQ. 18 HODGSON RUSS Attorneys for the Defendant 19 605 Third Avenue, Suite 2300 New York, New York 10158 20 BY: JILLIAN MARIE SEARLES, ESQ. MARK A. HARMON, ESQ. 21 22 23 1 24 25 Lisa A. Casey Offic~al Court Reporter I **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 2 of 126\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 3 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n-------,-----------\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE CLERK: This is index number 652071 of 2017 in the matter of ~acific Alliance Asia versus Ho Wan Kwok. Counsel, please note your appearances for the record. THE COURT: Okay. I was previously to~d that you needed an hour to set up this morning, but hlpPilY it only took you no time to set up, so let's probeed. MR. MOSS: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. Good morning. THE CLERK: please note your appearances, counsel. MR. MOSS: Good morning, your Honor. ['m Edward Moss from O'Melveny, for the plaintiff. MR. SARNOFF: Stuart Sarnoff from O'Me~veny for the plaintiff. MR. HOPLAMAZIAN: Garo Hoplamazian from O'Melveny for the plaintiff. MS. SEARLES: Jillian Searles, Hodgson Russ, for the defendant. MR. HARMON: Gdod morning, your Honor. Mark Harmon, Hodgson Russ. THE COURT: Welcome. MR. MOSS: Thank you, your Honor. Gooa morning. I know that the attachment issues have been Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 4 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n-- - -\\_.\\_-----------------,----------\n\n3\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 fully briefed several times, and I know your Honfr is familiar, so I'm going to move through my remarks quickly. THE COURT: Let's put, on the record, everything that the parties have stipulated to, and identify the issues to be tried this morning, on the record. MR. MOSS: Sure. And that's actually in my opening remarks, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. MR. MOSS: But I will start with that. (Whereupon, an exhibit was displayed to the Court. ) MR. MOSS: Your Honor, I was going to start by rev~ew~ng \" wh'at we are try~ng ,. tod*ay,* and a1so prov~I'de a short overview of the four witnesses you will heir from. The first issue is the attachment standard, 6201f2). The parties have stipulated to the first three elements: Cause of action; probability of success; and tha~ the amount demanded from 'the defendant exceeds all klown counterclaims, so we are here -- the first issue here we are from, the attachment issue, is whether or nott there's a grounds for attachment under 6201(3), lnd under 6201(3), that requires us to establish thaJ Mr. Kwok was acting with the intent to defraud cJeditors I\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 5 of 126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n4\n\nor frustrate a potential judgment in this case in his various attempts to put the apartment out of our reach, and there have been many of those.\n\nThe following slide, this has support our evidence for why we meet the the cases that I legal standard on intent. I thought it would be useful for you to have this handy, but I'm not going to waste time on it.\n\nThis has our evidence, and the evidencl that we will prove today. This is the evidence that Le featured in our briefing, and we'll prove it. I won't go through it now, but I thought it would be helpful to have it issue by issue, in addition to witness b~ witness. I will go through it witness by witnesk.\n\n16 17 18 19 The second ~ssue , we are here to prove asI\" ve~l I piercing. Veil piercing has two elements. Complete I domination and control, and abuse of the corporate form. I don't think there's a serious dispute about thl first one; and the second one, the intent problem will be the focus of our proof today.\n\n20 21 22 Here are the cases that support why our ev~'dence meets the standar.d Aga~n,' th'\"~s ~sJust I for your reference, your Honor, so that you have the~.\n\n23 24 25 I just want to pause on one thing on t~e two standards, the veil piercing standard and the atJachment d d ' h \" 1 stan ar. Ne~t er requ~res us to prove fraud. For the I\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 6 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n5\n\nMr. Kwok's translator and assistant. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 first, intent to frustrate a judgment is SUffiCijnt. For the second, the cases say inequity, malfeasance or wrongdoing as to our client is enough. To be clear, your Honor, we are going to prove fraud today. My point is that it's not required for us to do that. This is the veil piercing evidence, same veil piercing evidence we talked about in our brief. It's the veil piercing evidence that we are going to prove up today, and now I'm going to tell you about the fbur witnesses, briefly, and what they are going to tlstifY to today. Ms. Wang will be the first. Ms. Wang is Her testimLny will I demonstrate that in an effort to avoid the attachment, . I Mr. Kwok has gone so far as to suborn perJury. Ms. Want submitted an affidavit. It is Mr. Kwok's princi1al evidence opposing our prior attachment motion. ~hat's . I what he relied on, and she swore to facts about which she had absolutely no knowledge. Zero knowledge. We'll prove that today. Ms. Wang, will also confirm that Mr. Kwok was not telling the truth about two key issues. Number one, his pledges of the apartment, and remember I ' encumbrance is part of the standard under the CPLR. I Number two, the efforts to sell. I'm sure Mr. Harmon is I\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\ngoing to say what could be more public in the w~ole .world; right? You put this expensive apartment rn the market. Well, if he did, then why is he denying the fact that he received an offer in counter?\n\n5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next up is Mr. Ullman. Mr. Ullman is the' Sherry-Netherland Executive vice President and cia' He will testify that during the approval process, M~. Kwok showed the Sherry-Netherland no assets in the u.l. and no assets in his own name. That's never happene6 at the 11' .f h' . I hotel. Mr. U man w~ll also test~ y t at us~ng rwo LLC's, a foreign LLC on top of a'New York LLC, tr buy an apartment in that building, which is exactly whar Mr. Kwok said he did, has never happened before it the hotel either, and because of this, Mr. Ullman wiQl explain that the. Sherry-Netherland put in unprecldented safeguards, like the biggest security deposit evlr, because they were very concerned, based on the structure, that if Mr. Kwok defaulted on his monthly obligations, they would have to chase him across the globe, and he was showing no assets.\n\n21 22 23 24 25 We respectfully submit that we are similarly situated. We are going to get a judgment here, lnd we need similar safeguards attached for the same relsons. I Mr. Ullman will also testify that Mr. Kwok tried to assign, transfer, the apartment to a trLst in I\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n7\n\nhis son's name. Mr. Kwok denies having any memory of I that. Secrecy and asset transfer is something that helps us meet the standard. Since Mr. Kwok denibs it, we have Mr. Ullman here to talk about it, and thlre's documentary evidence.\n\n6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Finally, Mr. Ullman will also testify about misrepresentations that Mr. Kwok and his represehtatives made to the Sherry-Netherland about the pledges. They represented to you that the apartment was pledgea. They had a big problem, because that breached their lbase . I agreement with the Sherry-Netherland, so when the Sherry-Netherland saw their papers and said, Heyl you pledged the apartment they said, No, no. We nevlr told , h b ' d,l Just~ce Ostrager t at. You must e m~srea ~ng our papers. False. We'll prove it.\n\n16 Mr. Horvitz is next. Mr. Horvitz will testify 17 18 briefly by video. board president. He's the Sherry-Netherland CE0 and He lives in Cleveland. We depised him 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 there two weeks ago. He reviewed the financial information that Mr. Kwok provided to the Sherry-Netherland to induce the hotel to approve his application, and Mr. Horvitz relied on that financial information in recommending the board approval. That information included financials of two companies Mr. Kwok said he owned.\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 9 of\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n------------------------.---------\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 As you will see, your Honor, we showed Mr. Horvitz Mr. Kwok's deposition testimony, just the publicly available excerpts, where Mr. Kwok denibd having any ownership interests in those entities that he told the Sherry-Netherland he owned. His testimony directly contradicted what he told the Sherry-Netherland, and as the person to whom the misrepresentations were made, Mr. Horvitz will tell you h k h b . . I t at Mr. Kwo must ave een m~srepresent~ng to someone. He either lied at his deposition, or he defraude~ the Sherry-Netherland. There is no third option. Ahd Mr. Horvitz, your Honor, not I, actually used thl word defrauded.\n\n14 15 Finally, Mr. Kwok dominates we'll have Mr. Kwok. We'll show that and controls the Genever entihies. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 We'll show that he made repeated and significant misrepresentations to the Court in an effort to defeat the attachment motion; we'll show that he made mlterial misrepresentations to the Sherry-Netherland to ihduce it I to allow him to purchase; and we'll show that the money for the apartment may well have come from the shill company that is responsible for paying the debt ~o our client, that Mr. Kwok unconditionally guaranteedl It certainly didn't come from Genever, which was thi supposed purchaser. Importantly, your Honor, we are\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n9\n\n# **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n----------------------,---------\n\ngoing to demonstrate that Mr. Kwok will not and cannot pay a judgment in this case without an attachmenl.\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Now, we have teed up a few short clips for the opening, about seven minutes in total, of testimony that I would like to play from Mr. Kwok's deposition, which we.'re entitled to do under CPLR 3117 (a) (2): \"The deposition testimony of a party may be used for lny purpose by any party who was adversely interestek when h 0 '\" Tho 0 0 t l t e test~mony was g~ven. ~s ~s ~mportant tes ~mony, . your Honor, with an important purpose: Mr. Kwok will be here later -- he is here now -- and he will be on his best behavior in the public courtroom, but that' slnot what happened at the deposition. Your Honor, Mrl Kwok was evasive, he made a mockery of the proCeedingl and we I prepared the video, and we are entitled to show it so that the Court can see what we are really dealin~ with here.\n\n18 19 20 21 22 23 New York caselaw makes clear that evasiveness and misrepresenta~ions throughout Court proceedibgs is a I factor the court can consider, and after seeing this, I think the Court will agree that it's hard to ima~ine I stronger, more direct and significant evidence of evasiveness.\n\n24 25 Mr. Kwok has filed 17 or so lawsuits since he's been in this country. He knows exactly how the\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 11 of 126\n\n| | 10
Proceedings |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | legal
process
works,
and
he
cooperates
when
he
is
the |\n| 2 | plaintiff,
but
you
need
to
see
what
he
does
whei
we
are |\n| 3 | asking
him
questions
and
he
is
the
defendant.
We'll |\n| 4 | play
the
clips. |\n| 5 | This
is
the
first
clip.
I
asked
Mr.
Kwok
-- |\n| 6 | he
told
me
he
didn't
communicate
by
email,
so
I
laid, |\n| 7 | did
you
search
text
messages
to
try
to
respond
tL
our |\n| 8 | request
in
this
case?
And
this
is
how
he
answerld
me. |\n| 9 | (Video
tape
played.) |\n| 10 | MR.
MOSS:
I
also
tried
to
ask
Mr.
Kwok
some |\n| 11 | basic
questions.
There
were
significant
scoping |\n| 12 | objections,
and
they
wouldn't
let
me
ask
any
questions |\n| 13 | about
the
merits,
and
so
I
was
trying
to
understlnd
that |\n| 14 | he
understood
we
were
here
to
talk
about
the
attlchment |\n| 15 | I
issues,
and
here
is
what
happened
when
I
asked
that |\n| 16 | question. |\n| 17 | (Video
tape
played.\") |\n| 18 | MR.
MOSS:
One
of
the
topics
they
did
!let
me |\n| 19 | I
ask
about
was
the
Genever
entities,
the
two
shel!l. |\n| 20 | entities
that
Kwok
set
up
to
buy
the
apartment.
He
owns |\n| 21 | and
controls
those
two
entities,
and
he
was
also
the |\n| 22 | corporate
representative
for
both,
so
if
for
some
reason |\n| 23 | \"
I
he
didn't
know
anything
about
the
entities
that
he |\n| 24 | himself
set
up
--
which
of
course
he
did,
becausl
they |\n| 25 | I
are
him,
he
is
they
--
he
had
a
duty
to
educate
himself |\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\nI\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 12 of 126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n19\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nabout that, and here is what happened when I asked him simple questions on those topics.\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\n4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MR. MOSS: Your Honor, we talked brief[y, in our briefs -- excuse me, we talked extensively ib our briefs about counsel's instructions. to Mr. Kwok fO not answer questions at the deposition that were plaQnly relevant. The standard is whether he intends to frustrate the judgment. I asked him, will you pay if Court orders a judgment, and they instructed him not to answer that question. There was no agreement to not answer questions like that. It was completely inappropriate. It's terrible for them. They fought me to not play it for you today, so I'm not going tl play it, to avoid the fight, but I think you do need bo see that there were many times during the deposition where Mr. Kwok just refused to answer on his own without, even, an instruction, inappropriate or not.\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\n20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. MOSS: Finally, your Honor, the last one, I on the prior attachment motion we quoted a YouTube d ' , d' l' I au 10. It was Just an au 10 c 1p on YouTube that had a , \" ,I capt10n saY1ng 1t was Mr. Kwok's V01ce, and Mr. Kwok I supposedly was instructing his associates to seli certain assets quickly and quietly. They killed us in\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 13 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n| 12 |\n|----|\n\n| 1 | their
opposition
papers.
They
took
to
us
to
task.
They |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | said
PAX
doesn't
even
know
whether
that's
Mr.
KwbklS |\n| 3 | voice.
They
don't
know
whether
or
not
this
is |\n| 4 | authentic.
So
I
thought
maybe
in
his
deposition,
I |\n| 5 | would
ask
him.
I
played
the
audio
and
asked
him,
Hey, |\n| 6 | is
that
you?
Since
they
disputed
authenticity,
[ |\n| 7 | thought
it
was
a
pretty
fair
question.
And
here
is
what |\n| 8 | happened
then. |\n| 9 | (Video
tape
played.) |\n| 10 | MR.
MOSS:
Thank
you,
your
Honor.
We
iook |\n| 11 | forward
to
putting
our
case
on
today. |\n| 12 | MR.
HARMON:
Good
morning,
your
Honor. |\n| 13 | So
the.first
question
that
you
asked
was
what |\n| 14 | we
agreed
to,
what
we
stipulated
to,
and
just
to
be |\n| 15 | clear,
we
did
stipulate
that
for
the
purposes
of
this |\n| 16 | motion,
that
the
defendants
do
not
have
to
prove
that |\n| 17 | they're
likely
to
succeed
on
the
merits.
We
have
also |\n| 18 | stipulated
on
a
number
of
exhibits
that
have
beeh |\n| 19 | presented
in
a
book
to
you.
There
are
some
we
hive |\n| 20 | I
objections,
but
there
are
a
passel
of
exhibits
tfat
we |\n| 21 | have
stipulated
are
authentic
and
relevant
and
should
be |\n| 22 | I
admitted
into
evidence

We
have
stipulated
as
to |\n| 23 | various
transcripts
and
portions
of
transcripts,
and
of |\n| 24 | course
we
also
have
disagreement
about
the
trans€ript |\n| 25 | readings
and
the
exhibits,
which
we
can
get
to
dlring
I |\n\nI\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n126\n\n1 the hearing.\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n2 But your Honor, I don't have a multi-media 3 presentation. I haven't diced the transcript or the 4 testimony of the depositions in order to provide you clips that sound good. We have presented to you~ Honor the transcripts; their designated readings, our bross , I, designations, for completeness, and I would ask fhat your Honor, after the hearing today, read those [or the 9 full context. I think one of the prime examples is the last clip that you saw, where they say that Mr. Kwok put his fingers in his ears and refused to talk aboub it, to answer the question, but if you read the whole akswer what he is saying is, I challenge it toauthentibity. This is not real. Tell me. Show me that this ib my , , I voice. I don't believe it. Don't play me somebody I else's voice. So that's really all that I have to say 17 about that.\n\n18 I have read with care, I believe, your Honor's 19 20 21 admonitions, expressions of what evidence you want to hear at hearing. This the third time that we arl before your Honor on the attachment motion, and I hope !hat the the evidence that they have 1n. t h'e1r two mot10ns; . t,.at 1 at today, we are going to ~ear some point, at some time already submitted to you today's presentation by plaintiffs will not just ,be a regurgitation of all of 22 24 23 25\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n14\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\nanswers to the questions that you have raised abrut Mr. Kwok's intent in purchasing the apartment, and efforts to sell the apartment, why that's happening, and why that's no longer happening.\n\nThe plaintiff's asked us if we would agree to accept a subpoena from Mr. Kwok to be here. today, and we said that isn't necessary. We will have Mr Kwok here ans 'wer alny , and Mr. Kwok will appear voluntarily and questions you have from the witness stand that wl don't object to and which you don't sustain, and you cln hear I from Mr. Kwok exactly why he bought the apartment and what he has done with the apartment, and your Hohor, if the plaintiffs don't ask Mr. Kwok those questionb, I will.\n\n15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Mr. Kwok is not an American Citizen. Mr. Kwok did not grow up in the United States. Mr. Kwok krew up in China, in Hong Kong. He is here seeking aSYlhm from the Chinese Government. He has been the SUbject[ he and his family, his extended family in China, have blen the subject of extensive efforts by the Chinese commtnist , '1 h I Government to )a1 t em, abuse them, challenge them, because the communist government does not like wlat Mr. Kwok has to say about corruption and freedom in China.\n\n25 We have a language barrier here. Mr. Kwok\n\nI\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n15\n\ndoes not read English, and one the exhibits that has been submitted to you on consent is the contract of sale to purchase the apartment in the Sherry-Netherland. I . It's in English. It's not signed by Mr. Kwok, because I . he can't read English. He doesn't understand, or didn't . I understand, coming to this country, the concept of cooperative ownership, and his understanding of ownership is based upon his years and years business developer in China. That's how he the concept of family and ownership. of bjing a understands\n\n11 You can ask him a question of the 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 understanding of what u.S. -- what Americans think about ownership, and you can translate that to him and you can get his answer back, and it will be in English, and you've got a great sound bite, but what I would iSk your . I Honor to do is to recognize, when Mr. Kwok testifies, that there is not just a language issue, but thele is also a cultural issue here that needs to be undelstood in the context of what Mr. Kwok has said, and whit he has done.\n\n21 22 23 24 25 We didn't bring discovery issues to yom before the hearing, and I don't believe this is the pro~er time to raise discovery issues. If there were proble~s with the way we handled objections, or we handled the production of documents, we should have handled trhat in I\n\n### **Proceedings** 1 2 3 a meet and confer, resolving it discovery issues. We didn't do what *you* are going to hear today with the Court on that. So I belilve that from the Plaintlffs, 4 5 6 7 8 based on this presentation, is a reiteration and re-introduction of everything that they have already said twice, in two sets of motions. I hope that that's not going to be what we do today. I hope we are going to get to some real evidence that addresses the 9 10 11 questions that your Honor, that if the their case, I will Honor has, and I tell you, your 1 . . d . I p a~nt~ffs don't 0 ~t as part of ask Mr. Kwok on my opportunit~ to 12 13 15 16 cross examine him. Thank you. MR. MOSS: Your Honor, to a couple, very, very briefly. evidence, you asked us -- I just want to respond First, in terml of the 17 18 19 20 21 . 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: We should just proceed with the testimony. MR. MOSS: Let's go. Perfect. Thank you, your Honor. . THE COURT: We argued motions twice before. MR. MOSS: Fair enough, your Honor .. wl call our first witness, Yvette Wang. Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 18 of 126\n\n| | 17
by
Wang.
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Moss |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | Y
A
N
PIN
G
WAN
G,
having
been
duly
sworn
by
the |\n| 2 | clerk,
was
examined
and
testified
as
follows: |\n| 3 | THE
CLERK:
In
a
loud,
clear
voice,
please |\n| 4 | state
your
full
name
and
address. |\n| 5 | THE
WITNESS:
My
name
is
Wang,
Yan
Ping.
My |\n| 6 | address
is
22D
150
East
57th
Street,
New
York,
N~W
York. |\n| 7 | THE
CLERK:
Thank
you.
Be
seated. |\n| 8 | I
THE
WITNESS:
Thank
you,
sir. |\n| 9 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
The
witness
is
sworn,
your |\n| 10 | Honor. |\n| 11 | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
I
have
a
copy
of |\n| 12 | Ms.
Wang's
deposition
transit.
Is
it
okay
if
I
lpproach |\n| 13 | and
provide
it
to
her? |\n| 14 | Thank
you. |\n| 15 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the |\n| 16 | witness.
) |\n| 17 | DIRECT
EXAMINATION |\n| 18 | BY
MR.
MOSS: |\n| 19 | Ms.
Wang,
you
work
for
Mr.
Kwok;
right?
Q |\n| 20 | A
I
work
for
whole
family. |\n| 21 | Mr.
Kwok's
family?
Q |\n| 22 | A
No.
Guo
Family.
G-U-O. |\n| 23 | What's
Mr.
Kwok's
name?
Q |\n| 24 | A
Kwok
Ho
Wan. |\n| 25 | Guo;
right?
The
same
Guo,
the
.family
name?
Q |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n18 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 A He is family. His name is Kwok, K-W-O-K. His 2 family is, Guo, G-U-O. 3 Q Do you dispute that you work for Mr. Kwok's family 4 5 6 7 businesses? A Let me explain. Mr. Guo, Guo Family, his family has more than hundred people, including his seven -- ~ I believe total, including himself -- seven brothers, and they 8 have their different, like, family, small family. So 9 totally, together, there are more than one hundred people in 10 the family. So this family, different family member, they 11 have their different parts in the family business. So I work 12 for the whole family. 13 14 15 Q A Q One of the members of the family is Mr. Kwok? Yeah. He is one of the family member. You worked for Mr. Kwok's family companies in Hong 16 Kong; right? 17 l8 A Q Yes. since February 2018, you work for one of his family 19 companies in New York; right? 20 A Yes. 21 22 Q So, since 2009, so for the had no other employer other than the last 10 years, y0u have Guo Family; righ~? 23 24 A Q Correct. I would like to talk about Mr. Kwok's efforts to 25 sell the apartment. Up until recently, you know that Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter 126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 Mr. Kwok's broker was Kathy Sloane; right? 19 2 3 A Q Correct. You, on behalf of Mr. Kwok, had discussions with 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 Ms. Sloane about selling the apartment; right? A Let me correct. I am the contact person berween Mr. Kwok and Ms. Kathy Sloane, because Mr. Kwok, he dies not read and write English at all, so that's why Ms. KathV Sloane, a lot of time, reach out to me asking me to sknd her message to Mr. Kwok, and then because Mr. Kwok, he dols not write and read English, so I have to translate for hil and put his message, like, translate into English, and sehd back to Ms. Kathy Sloane. 13 14 Q A Understood. Thank you for the clarification. Thank you. 15 16 17 Q And sometimes you have exchanged emails with . I Ms. Wang on -- excuse me, w~th Ms. Sloane on behalf of Mr. Kwok about efforts to sell the apartment; right? 18 19 20 A Correct. MR. MOSS: If I may, your Honor? (Whereupon, a document was handed to tme 21 22 23 24 witness. ) (Whereupon, an exhibit was displayed to the Court. ) MR. MOSS: PX 17, which in evidence. 25 Q Ms. Wang, this is an email from Ms. Sloane ~n I Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 21 of\n\n| | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss | 20 |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|\n| 1 | November
of
2016;
right? | |\n| 2 | Correct.
A | |\n| 3 | There's
an
email
address,
Yvette
Wong,
or
Q | |\n| 4 | Yvette.yue423
at
GMail;
right? | |\n| 5 | Correct.
A | |\n| 6 | That's
your
email.
address?
Q | |\n| 7 | A
It
was
my
email
address,
but
now
I
cannot
get | in |\n| 8 | there
because
my
a
lot
email
address,
they
were | habked
by |\n| 9 | Chinese
Communist
Party,
so
I
do
not
have
access
any | lore. |\n| 10 | Sorry. | |\n| 11 | Excuse
me.
I'm
sorry
for
almost
cutting
you
Q | off. |\n| 12 | At
the
time,
this
was
your
email
address? | |\n| 13 | A
Correct. | |\n| 14 | And
you
sent
and
received
these
emails?
Q | |\n| 15 | Correct.
A | |\n| 16 | I
would
like
to
direct
your
attention
to
the
Q | \"Dear |\n| 17 | Miles\"
email
on
the
bottom
of
the
page. | |\n| 18 | It
says,
\"I
have
been
giving
a
lot
of
thought | to |\n| 19 | the
offer
that
--\"
name
redacted
\"--
that
someone
has | put |\n| 20 | forward
for
your
apartment
at
the
Sherry-Netherland.\" | |\n| 21 | Do
you
see
that? | |\n| 22 | Yes.
A | |\n| 23 | In
or
around
this
time,
someone
had
put
forth
Q | an. |\n| 24 | offer
on
the
apartment;
right? | |\n| 25 | From
the
email.
Yes.
A | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 22 of 126\n\n> 21 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 2 3 Q Well, you knew that. That email refreshed ¥our recollection that there was a \\$60 million offer on thb table; right? 4 A Correct. 5 6 7 Q It says, \"I'm sensitive to the fact that you have aIready rnade a very s~gn~ ' 'f'~cant concess~on'h w en you agree I d to I counter at 67 million;\" right? I read that correctly? 8 9 A Q This is from Ms. Kathy Sloane, her email. Right. And what she was saying was that Mr. Kwok 10 countered the offer; right? You know that? 11 12 A Q I don't know about this. You don't know whether or not Mr. Kwok countered 13 the offer? 14 A Correct. 15 16 Q Okay. And she said, at the top, please read to this Miles at your earliest \"Dear Yvette, conveniencl.\" Do 17 you see that? 18 Do you see that portion, \"Dear Yvette, please read 19 this to Mil<;!sat your earliest convenience\"? 20 21 A Q Which page? See that portion, \"Please read this to Miles at 22 your earliest convenience\"? 23 24 25 A Q A Yes. I saw this. And Miles is Mr. Kwok; right? Correct. Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n| | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM |\n|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22
Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18
Page 23 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 22
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n| 1 | You
read
it
to
him;
right?
Q |\n| 2 | Yes,
I
did.
A |\n| 3 | And
I
want
to
be
very,
very
clear
about
this
for.
Q |\n| 4 | I
the
Court,
this
one.
Mr.
Kwok
knew
about
this
\\$60
mi~lion |\n| 5 | offer;
right? |\n| 6 | Yes.
A |\n| 7 | You
have
no
doubt
about
that;
right?
Q |\n| 8 | A
Mr.
Kwok
knew
that
from
Ms.
Kathy
Sloane,
and
this |\n| 9 | is
why
I
say
I
do
not
know,
because
this
is,
I
gathertd
some |\n| 10 | information,
or
obtained
information,
which
means
either |\n| 11 | Ms.
Kathy
Sloane
told
me,
or
emailed
me.
Then
I
saw
hhe |\n| 12 | email.
I
said,
Oh,
okay

There
is
an
offer,
like
thts
way. |\n| 13 | Or
Mr.
Kwok
told
me.
So
that's
why,
when
both
of
them |\n| 14 | d'1SCUSS
,
there,
th\"1S
gatI h'ered
or
ment1on,
I
was
not
so
1S
my |\n| 15 | of
obtained
information,
not
my
personal
information.
So |\n| 16 | this
is.not
my
personal
information. |\n\n17 18 When you ask me, do you know I'm just a messenger between these two 19 have that personal information. I just gathered that 20 information from either Ms. Kathy Sloane or Mr. Kwok. I'm 21 just a messenger.\n\n22 23 Q Right. You passed the the \\$60 million offer that Kathy message to Mr. Kwok about I Sloane told you about. 24 25 A Q I did. Right. And Mr. Kwok knew about the offer.\n\n| FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|--------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Doc 404-17 | Filed 05/20/22
126 | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 24 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n\n23 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** witness. ) Court. ) (Whereupon, an exhibit was displayed to the MS. SEARLES: There are actually a few key Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter In this case? Yes. Correct. You know you submitted an affidavit in this case? Yes. Q A MR. MOSS: Your Honor, it's not in evimence. They have an objection to it. I offer it. It's not for the.truth. A Q A MR~ MOSS: This is PX 34. Q This is your affidavit; right, Ms. Wang? A Correct. Q You did that on behalf of Mr. Kwok; right? A I did that on behalf of Golden Spring New York and the Guo Family, yes. Q Well, you did that in support of Mr. Kwok's opposition to our motion to attach his apartment. A Yes. Q Right? A Yes. Q Let's take a look at the affidavit. (Whereupon, a document was handed to the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n24\n\nissues with this particular exhibit. One of the exhibits, exhibit C to it, is subject to a stipu~ation on the merits, and we have had an ongoing discuslion with respect to the pledge issue. Your Honor make clear that the pledge had nothing to do with whether ol not attachment would be had; it just had to do with priority. I have no problem with them using impeachment. It's obviously in front of the a pleading, but I don't think it is a proper be admitted into evidence. That's the issue have. this as I , Court, J.t's exhl'b' iL J.tto I that I MR. MOSS: Your Honor, it sounds like a\n\n12 13 relevance objection, which, I think I your Honor can take 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 it for what it's worth. It's obviously in front of the Court. We can pause on the pledge for one issue, because I think that's going to come up a lot tohay. The pledges, 6201(3) talks about encumbering an lsset I with an intent to frustrate a judgment. The casjs say that a pledge is an encumbrance. They put this issue in front of you. They said, We pledged it, so you ban't attach it. You denied that argument, because thlt's a f \" b h ' . I matter 0 prJ.orJ.ty, ut t ey're trYJ.ng to tWJ.st that rule and say the pledges are off the table, and !hey are not relevant for this. It's in the CPLR, and thl misrepresentations about the pledges go straight to the\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 26 of 126\n\n> 25 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 fraudulent intent, so it couldn't be more relevant. It's evidence they put in front of her. THE COURT: You have a witness on the ritness stand. You can ask the witness any questions you want to ask the witness. To the extent that the witnbss has .. . h\" . I . h g~ven pr~or to sworn test~mony t at ~s ~ncons~stent w~t the testimony that she lives gives today, you cah use the affidavit for impeachment purposes, so there's really no need to introduce the affidavit as evidence, because she is here. You can ask her anything ybu want. THE WITNESS: Thank you. 12 13 14 Q A Q Let's take look at the affidavit, Ms. Wang. Yes. You submitted the affidavit in support of the 15 opposition to the attachment motion; right? 16 17 18 19 A Q A Q Correct. You understood this was a legal document? Yes, I do. You understood it was being used in a legal 20 proceeding? 21 22 A Q Yes, I do. And you knew it was going to be submitted here in 23 Supreme Court to Justice Ostrager; right? 24 A Yes. I learn that. I'm still learning. . 25 Q You understood that this wasn't just a casual I Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 27 of\n\n![](_page_26_Figure_1.jpeg)\n\n25 affidavit; right?\n\n24 have any personal knowledge of the statements in the\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n| 1 | A
This
affidavit
was
drafted
by
attorney,
so
a
lot
of |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | information,
what
I
can
see,
because
I
am
here,
the |\n| 3 | administrator
and
President
of
Golden
Spring
New
York,
the |\n| 4 | administrator,
which
I
knew
that
I
am
the
documents
or |\n| 5 | I .
information
gather
people.
I
try
collect
the
documents,
get |\n| 6 | information.
So
all
of
this
information
in
here,
the~'re
not |\n| 7 | I
my
personal
knowledge,
because
I
was
not
involved
in
any
of |\n| 8 | the
things
in
here,
so
I'm
trying
to
help
to
gather |\n| 9 | information
and
documents
from
different
people. |\n| 10 | Q
Ms.
Wang,
you
sworn
to
the
Court
that
Mr.
Kwok |\n| 11 | I
owned
the
apartment;
right?
And
he
owned
it
through
another |\n| 12 | entity;
right? |\n| 13 | SEARLES:
MS.
Objection.
Leading. |\n| 14 | THE
COURT:
That's
overruled. |\n| 15 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
You
can
answer. |\n| 16 | THE
WITNESS:
I
can
answer.
Okay. |\n| 17 | A
In
this
affidavit,
swear,
yes.
I
yes. |\n| 18 | And
you
don't
know
if
Mr.
Kwok
owns
the
apartment
Q |\n| 19 | or
not;
right? |\n| 20 | A
When
you
say
I
don't
know,
I
don't
understand, |\n| 21 | you're
talking
about
my
personal
knowledge?
Which
I
hon't |\n| 22 | know,
because
personally,
when
this
apartment
was
purlhased, |\n| 23 | or
happened
afterwards,
especially
when
it
was
purchabed,
I |\n| 24 | was
not
in
the
U.S.
and
I
did
not
involve,
handle, |\n| 25 | communicate
or
negotiate,
attend
any
meeting
at
all.
So
I
do |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 29 of 126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n| 1 | not
have
any
personal
knowledge
about
that.
This
all,
is
I |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | when
I
was
requested,
I
have
to
start
to
ask
the
peopll.e; |\n| 3 | gather
information;
collect
information
from
other
pebple. |\n| 4 | MR.
MOSS:
Let's
play
the
deposition. |\n| 5 | (Video
tape
played.) |\n| 6 | You
never
saw
a
single
paper
about
the
ownership
of
Q |\n| 7 | the
apartment;.
right? |\n| 8 | I
did
saw
paper
about
this
ownership
since
this
A |\n| 9 | case
started.
So
the
attorney
asked
my
help
.to
go
to
look |\n| 10 | for
documents.
I
did
see
some
documents. |\n| 11 | (Whereupon,
an
exhibit
was
displayed
to
the |\n| 12 | Court.
) |\n| 13 | THE
COURT:
Look,
without
the
slide,
you're |\n| 14 | i
going
to
ask
her
if
she
knows
whether
Mr.
Kwok
oLns
the |\n| 15 | If
I h
apartment.
She
either
does
or
she
doesn't.
e
says |\n| 16 | she
doesn't
know,
and
she
previously
swore
that
he
did |\n| 17 | own
the
apartment,
then
you
can
impeach
her.
If
she |\n| 18 | says
that
he
doesn't
own
the
apartment,
and
she |\n| 19 | previously
sworn
that
he
does
own
the
apartment,
then |\n| 20 | you
can
impeach
her,
but
all
we
are
doing
now
is |\n| 21 | eliciting
her
testimony. |\n| 22 | Ms.
Wang,
you
just
testified
that
you
did
n0t
know
Q |\n| 23 | I
that
Mr.
Kwok
owned
the
apartment,
and
I'm
going
to
direct |\n| 24 | your
attention
to
paragraph
two
of
your
affidavit. |\n| 25 | MS.
SEARLES:
Objection.
That
misstates
her
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n29\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 30 of\n\n1\n\ntestimony.\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n19\n\n**Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** THE COURT: Okay. Look ,.do you know whether Mr. Kwok owns the apartment? Yes or no. THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. THE COURT: And does he own the apartment? THE WITNESS: I heard, still. I heard, and via a different entity, and different entity own the apartment, and he owns, like, different entity. This is what I learned from the whole document. THE COURT: You have no personal knowledge -- THE WITNESS: No. THE COURT: -- one way or the other? **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 126\n\nTHE WITNESS: No, your Honor. Yeah.\n\n16 17 18 Q Ms. Wang, do I have it right that you just said you did see papers about the ownership of the apartment? A Correct.\n\nTHE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.\n\nQ Take a look at your deposition, page 78.\n\n20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: That's not how we do this. We have lots of motion papers. If you are going to use a deposition for impeachment, you say, Do you recall being deposed, Do you recall being asked the following questions and giving the following answers, and that comes into the record, and if it constitutes\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 31 of\n\n30 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 impeachment, I'll take pote of that. If it's of no 2 moment, I'll ignore it. 3 Q Ms. Wang, do you recall that I deposed you? 4 A Yes. That was you, sir. 5 Q I'm going to read: 6 \"Question: Who do you think of as the owner 7 of the apartment? 8 \"Answer: I don't know, because I never see 9 any paper in front of me, so I don't know. It's all I 10 heard from him, but -I don't know.\" 11 Do you recall being asked that question and giving 12 that answer? 13 A Yes, I did. 14 Q Any statement you made about the apartment's 15 ownership would just be a guess; right? A have personal information; okay? deposed by you, sir, I was .super nervous. time sit in front of your Honor and this Court. Let me explain, sir. So all the information about I this apartment, which is my gathered information, I do not I So second, when I was I I have to say, I even now, I'm still very nervous, because this is my first So wLen I I was deposed by you, sir, I was very nervous, and my memory somehow come into, like, a blank, totally blank. ver~ - . I important is that English is not even my second language. My first language is Chinese Mandarin, so my second langlage, I 23 25 24 21 20 22 19 18 17 16\n\n126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n1 foreign language, is French, and I'm learning English, so a 2 lot of, like, language barrier happen.\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n3 So when I was deposed by you, sir, I was super 4 nervous, and you give me, I remember, some documents, like 5 6 7 8 something which I can show, have difficulty to read all paper in front of you, sir. nervous. like this kind of documents, I of this technical legal flna~cial I So that's why I was super\n\n9 10 11 12 13 14 And then, by the way, I remember you did not show me my affidavit when you deposed me; right? You did hot show me this, and you just showed me this (indicating). sl then I was given that, I was shaking my hands. I tried to rlad all of them, and plus these documents, I just collect froL other people. So that's why I try to give you an answer, llke, in 15 a very limited time. I don't want to waste any other 16 people's .time. So when I could not recognize, and I'm not 17 sure, I just say I don't know.\n\n18 19 But basically, this case, and I am only I'm a very conservative peoPle in able to be responsible for my 20 personal knowledge. If you know, this is my gathered 21 information, my gathered knowledge, or just documents pass by 22 my hands. I was super nervous, just like right now. I 23 probably say, sir, I don't know, I don't remember. Yeah. 24 That's my situation when you deposed me, sir. 25 Q Page 78 of the deposition:\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n| | --------
-- -------------,---------~
INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22
Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18
Page 33 of |\n|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 32 |\n| | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n| 1 | \"Question:
Do
you
think
he
owns
it? |\n| 2 | \"Answer:
I
don't
know.
I
cannot
guess.\" |\n| 3 | Do
you
recall
being
asked
that
question
and
giving |\n| 4 | that
answer? |\n| 5 | Yes,
sir.
A |\n| 6 | Q
And
you
know
that
your
counsel
refused
having
a |\n| 7 | translator
at
the
deposition;
right?
Even
though
we
lSked
if |\n| 8 | you
needed
one
at
the
deposition? |\n| 9 | MS.
SEARLES:
No.
Objection.
Just
for |\n| 10 | clarification,
we
did
not
refuse. |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
Look |\n| 12 | MS.
SEARLES:
The
witness
requested
that
she |\n| 13 | didn't
need
one. |\n| 14 | THE
COURT:
All
the
arguments
that
you
have, |\n| 15 | each
of
you,
have
been
memorialized
in
extensive |\n| 16 | findings.
I
don't
want
to
hear
any
arguments
about |\n| 17 | l't
h.lng.
I'
hear
and
I
I
anyt
Just
want
to
testlmony
want |\n| 18 | to
be
elicited
in
an
ordinary
and
expeditious
falhion. |\n| i9 | So
all
we
have
accomplished
in
the
last
15
minutls
is |\n| 20 | that
this
witness
has
indicated
that
she
has
no
lersonal |\n| 21 | 0
concernlng'
the
h'lp
f
th'lS
I
know
1edge
owners
apartment. |\n| 22 | That's
what
she
testified
to
at
her
deposition,
lnd |\n| 23 | that's
what
she
is
testifying
to
on
the
witness
itand. |\n| 24 | Next
question. |\n| 25 | MS.
SEARLES:
Thank
you,
sir. |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n### 33 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 Q Ms. Wang, you don't know, you have no idea where 2 the money came from to purchase the apartment; right? 3 4 A Q I have no personal knowledge about that. Nobody ever told you; right? 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A Nobody told me, but I heard diSCUssosiOInm'aybehCleauarsesoIme was requested, try to gather information. information. Q You have no knowledge at all about the purchase of the apartment, because you were on leave and living il Beijing at the time; right? The apartment was purchabed? I A I do not have personal knowledge about the purchase of apartment, because I was in Beijing by then, yes. 13 Q You don't know whether Mr. Kwok owns the apartment 14 through Genever; right? 15 16 A Q I learned that after this case happened. Yeah. Did you learn it after your deposition? 17 18 A No. I learned that when this including the deposition, because I was case happened, like I requested to gather 19 information for the attorney. \"Answer: I'm not quite clear about ultimately owns the apartment because he owns 20 21 22 Q \"Question: You understand that Mr. KW0k I Genever? thlt 23 24 25 answer. \"Questio~: You are not sure who owns Genever? \"Answer: Yes.\" 126\n\n.\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 35 of 126\n\n34 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 Do you ~ecall being asked those questions and 2 giving those answers? 3 4 5 to read page and MR. HARMON: Your Honor, if Mr. Moss is from the transcript, can he first tell ub line from which he is reading, so we cah going the follow 6 7 8 9 along? 19. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. MOSS: I was just reading from 77, 13 to 10 .Q Do you recall being asked those questions and 11 giving those answers? 12 13 14 15 A Q A Q Yes, I did. You don't know who owns Genever; right? I do not have personal knowledge about that. ~ou don't know who owns Genever New York or Genever 16 B.V.I; right? 17 18 A I gather that information. It's kind of like B.V.I owns New York LLC company, and New York LLC company oLn 19 apartment. 20 21 9. 22 Q Now I'm going read from your deposition, 102, 7 to \"Question: You don't know who owns Genever 23 24 25 New York or Genever B.V.I. \"Answer: I don't know.\" Do you recall being asked that question and giving Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n| | 35
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | that
answer? |\n| 2 | Yes,
I
did,
sir.
When
I
say
I
don't
know,
[
mean
I
A |\n| 3 | have
personal
information,
and
I'm
not
quite
slre,
so
do
not |\n| 4 | that's
why
for
conservative
answer,
I'd
rather
say,
I
don't |\n| 5 | know. |\n| 6 | Even
though
you
sworn
to
those
things
in
an
Q |\n| 7 | affidavit
to
this
Court? |\n| 8 | A
Sir,
we
have
understanding
difference.
Like,
my |\n| 9 | understanding
is
personal
information,
which
I
say
thlt,
I
am |\n| 10 | conservative
Chinese
woman,
so
that's
why,
if
I
do
no~
have |\n| 11 | that
personal
information,
or
I
did
not
involve,
handle,
by |\n| 12 | my
hands,
I
would
rather
say
I
don't
know.
Yeah,
I
don't |\n| 13 | want
to
guess. |\n| 14 | Q
So
you
were
being
conservative
at
your
deposition, |\n| 15 | I
but
not
conservative
when
you
made
those
same
statements
In |\n| 16 | court? |\n| 17 | A
I
am
conservative
person,
sir
and
I
will
be
100
,
I' |\n| 18 | and
I
am
100,
percent
responsible
for
my
personal
knOjledge |\n| 19 | and
information.
When
I
just
gather
information,
or
hearing |\n| 20 | it,
or
heard
something,
if
I'm
not
sure,
usually
I
jult
say
I |\n| 21 | don't
know.
Yeah. |\n| 22 | So
if
you
have
no
personal
knowledge
of
anything
in
Q |\n| 23 | the
affidavit,
who
is
responsible
for
that? |\n| 24 | A
Correct.
Do
I
not
have
personal
information. |\n| 25 | So
who
is
responsible
for
the
affidavit,
sihce
you
Q
I |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 37 of 126\n\n### 36 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 don't have personal information? 2 3 4 5 6 A Q A Q knowledge Whose affidavit? Your affidavit? Oh. Me. Myself. Yes. But you just told me that you don't have personal of facts in the affidavit\" and you don't tJke 7 responsibility when you don't have personal knowledge; right? 8 A Sir, I'm 100 percent responsible for my affidavit, 9 10 11 12 which I sweared. so -- which I am explain, because what I said what I have understanding difference in here, f 1 . h' I . very grate u I'm glven t 1S opportun1ty to there's understanding difference bet~een I was deposing -- what I'm deposing by you, 13 sir, and what I'm meaning, really, I have personal 14 information or not. This is understanding difference, sir, 15 ~nd plus~ I'm sorry about my language. Sometimes when you 16 stare at me, ask me that question, I'm super nervous. Even 17 right now. 18 19 20 Q A Q I'm sorry. I'm not trying to make you nervous. Sorry about that. You don't even know that there are two separate 21 Genever entities; right? 22 A You mean personal knowledge, or my gathered 23 information? 24 Q I mean, I'm asking you the question, do you know\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\nI\n\n25 whether or not there are two separate Genever entities?\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n| 1 | I
gather
the
information
saying
there
are
two
A |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | separate
entities. |\n| 3 | You
have
no
knowledge
of
any
pledges
of
the
assets
Q |\n| 4 | of
Genever
Holdings
LLC
or
Genever
Holdings
Corporation; |\n| 5 | right? |\n| 6 | A
Again,
I
do
not
have
any
personal
knowledge
about |\n| 7 | this.
This
is'my
gathered
information.
I
heard
abouf
this. |\n| 8 | Q
So
you
made
sworn
statements
to
the
Court
about |\n| 9 | I
facts
that
you
had
no
personal
knowledge
about,
that
was
,
I |\n| 10 | gathered
information
that
you
heard
about?
That's
your |\n| 11 | testimony? |\n| 12 | A
My
testimony,
there
are
two
kinds
of
information, |\n| 13 | which
is
personal
information
knowledge
and
gathered |\n| 14 | information
knowledge. |\n| 15 | And
you
have
no
personal
knowledge
about
any
Q |\n| 16 | pledges
of
the
apartment;
right? |\n| 17 | Correct,
sir.
A |\n| 18 | You
don't
know
whether
or
not
the
apartment
has
Q |\n| 19 | been
pledged
at
all;
right? |\n| 20 | I
do
not
have
that
personal
information.
A |\n| 21 | Q
You
never
had
any
discussions
with
anyone
about |\n| 22 | pledging
the
apartment;
right? |\n| 23 | A
I
personally
did
not
discuss
anything
about
this. |\n| 24 | You
never
had
any
discussions
with
Mr.
Kwok
about
Q |\n| 25 | any
pledges;
right? |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n### **Wang. for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n126\n\n38\n\n| 1 | A
May
I
ask,
what
do
you
mean,
discuss?
You
mean |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | ask,
or
mention,
or
discuss
how
do
we
pledge;
what
is |\n| 3 | resolved;
what
is
the
strategy
plan?
I'm
confused
about
your |\n| 4 | question.
What
do
you
mean,
discuss? |\n| 5 | Q
Did
you
ever
talk
about
the
pledges
with
Mr.
Kwok? |\n| 6 | A
I
mentioned,
or
he
mentioned
that
to
me,
I
don't |\n| 7 | remember
that
clearly.
Just,
Oh,
there
is
a
pledge.
But
I |\n| 8 | did
not
ever
involve,
like,
Okay,
sit
down
and
tell
me
what |\n| 9 | is
happening,
what
is
the
details,
and
I
never
ever
ihvolve, |\n| 10 | like,
Okay,
I
was
going
there
and
doing
that
pledge.
I |\n| 11 | didn't
do
that. |\n| 12 | I'm
going
to
read
from
your
deposition,
page
81,
Q |\n| 13 | lines
9
through
11: |\n| 14 | \"You
never
had
any
discussion
with
Mr.
Kwok |\n| 15 | about
pledges? |\n| 16 | \"Answer:
No.\" |\n| 17 | Do
you
recall
being
asked
that
question
and
giving |\n| 18 | that
answer? |\n| 19 | THE
COURT:
That's
not
inconsistent
with
what |\n| 20 | she
just
testified
to.
It's
completely
consistelt
with |\n| 21 | what
she
just
said. |\n| 22 | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
she
denied
having
any |\n| 23 | I
conversations
in
the
deposition,
and
she
just
said
that |\n| 24 | she
did
have
a
conversation. |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
That's
not
what
I
heard
her
say. |\n| | I |\n\n| | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss | 39 |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\n| 1 | Did
you
have
a
conversation
with
Mr. | Kwok |\n| 2 | about
the
ownership
of
the
apartment? | |\n| 3 | THE
WITNESS:
No,
sir.
I
just
heard. | I
ask |\n| 4 | him,
and
he
told
me,
and
I
know,
okay,
this
is | the |\n| 5 | situation.
But
I
did
not
have,
like,
a
discussibn, | like |\n| 6 | of
five,
ten
minutes,
or
sit
down
to
go
through | bhe |\n| 7 | details.
Because
I'm
just
like
an
administrator, | |\n| 8 | collect
information
for
the
lawyer
and
get
documrnts | for |\n| 9 | the
lawyer,
so
I
don't
know
the
background,
and | [
don't |\n| 10 | know
the
logic. | |\n| 11 | Did
Mr.
Kwok
ever
tell
you
that
the
apartment
Q | or |\n| 12 | Genever
had
been
pledged? | |\n| 13 | A
Sorry,
sir.
What
.is
the
question? | |\n| 14 | Did
Mr.
Kwok
ever
tell
you
that
the
apartment
Q | or |\n| 15 | Genever
had
been
pledged? | |\n| 16 | A
I
believe
is
not
him.
Yeah. | |\n| 17 | You
believe
he
did
not
tell
you
that?
Q | |\n| 18 | A
He
mentioned
that
to
me. | |\n| 19 | Mr.
Kwok
told
you
that
the
apartment
or
Q | Genever
was |\n| 20 | pledged? | |\n| 21 | A
I
don't
remember
it
was
first
time
he
told | me,
or
I |\n| 22 | told
him,
because
I
gathered
that
information
from | otLer |\n| 23 | people.
Then,
kind
of
like,
I
told
him,
and
he
mentiln | that |\n| 24 | to
me. | |\n| 25 | At
your
deposition,
page
81:
Q | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 41 of\n\n **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** \"Question: You never told Mr. Kwok tHat Genever was pledg~d? \"Answer: No. \"Question: He never told you that it was pledged?' \"Answer: No.\" Q Do you recall being asked those questions and giving those answers? A Correct, sir. Q If you can, please turn to Exhibit B of your affidavit. (Whereupon, an exhibit was displayed to the Court.) Q I would like to direct your attention to the first page. This is a document that you attached to your affidavit; right, Ms. Wang? A Correct. Q In support of your statement that the apartment was pledged; right? A Looks like, yes. Q And I would like to direct your attention to the first page. Do you see there's a charge ID, FBAKOY? A Sorry. Which page, sir? Q Right here. It's the first page of Exhibit B. You see the charge ID? It says FBAKOY?\n\n-\\_.\\_. \\_.\\_--------\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 42 of 126\n\n41 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 2 3 4 5 6 A Q A Q A Q Yes. I saw that. And pledge was made to Roscalitar 2? Yes. And the pledge date was May 21, 2015; right? Correct. Did anyone ever tell you, or did you ever gather 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 the information -- MS. SEARLES: Objection. Your Honor, IT apologize for interrupting again, but he just kelps reading from this document which is not actually in evidence. THE COURT: Is this an exhibit that you have in your exhibit book? 14 15 16 MR. MOSS: Yes. It's in the it's her affidavit -- it's attached to It's their document. exhibit book, and her affidlvit. Q Ms. Wang, when you Court and you swore that the May of 2015, did you know - had actually been terminated **in,** in March of 20117 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MS. SEARLES: But it has not been admitted. It's one of the ones we have an issue over. THE COURT: All right. Look, just proceed. submitted this document bo the I . apartment had been Pledgjd since did you know that this p!edge before you put your affikavit 25 A Sir, let me make it clear, again. When you depose Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n### **w.ang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n42\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 me, you give me this, and.without giving me my affidarit. And remember, my affidavit, which I signed, it's about one d h d .. hi year ago, an w en you epose me, you Just g~ve me t e exhibits, you did not give me any of my affidavits, ahd all the exhibits, which I am just a person collected them from other people. So I have to emphasize that as administrator of Go lden Spr~ng, . that I co11ect documents and ~n. fl.ormat~on every day, so there's lot of documents and informatioh I'm collecting for you, for my attorney, and for other prbject. 1 I cannot remember which one is for what, so when you depose me, you show me that this is just one or two pages in my thousands, millions of pages of other documents. And I have to say that when I collect all of these documents, why I'm the person collecting, because my 15 16 colleague, either they are kidnapped Party, either because of a threaten; by Chinese Communist h . h' I. b t ey qu~t t e~r DO ; 17 either they just leaving nothing and just left. So I'm in a\n\n19 documents.\n\n20 21 22 And a lot of documents I just put it in my file and I do not have time to review that, so it's I even really difficulty for me that you show me the documents in I your 23 deposition and ask me if I can recall from my memory, right 24 25 away, to tell you, this documents, I know what was and what was resolved and what was there. So it's happening I really I\n\n18 very hopeless position to help to collect all of these\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n126\n\n| 1 | just
like
two,
three
pieces
of
paper
in
my
whole
files. |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | Okay.
So
I'm
not
talking
about
your
deposition.
Q |\n| 3 | What
I'm
asking
you
is
--
it's
just
very
simple.
Let
me
try |\n| 4 | the
question
again.
When
you
submitted
this
document |\n| 5 | swearing
that
the
apartment
had
been
pledged
since
Ma¥
of |\n| 6 | 2015,
did
you
know
that
this
pledge
was
terminated
in
March |\n| 7 | of
2017,
and
that
the
apartment
that
you
were
swearing
was |\n| 8 | pledged
was
not
actually
pledged
anymore?
Did
you
knbw
that? |\n| 9 | A
I
do
not
have
personal
information,
knowled6e. |\n| 10 | Q
Did
you
hear
that
pledge
had
been
terminate~
before |\n| 11 | you
swore
to
the
Court
that
it
was
terminated? |\n| 12 | A
I
don't
remember
that,
sir. |\n| 13 | MR.
MOSS:
May
I,
your
Honor? |\n| 14 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the |\n| 15 | witness.
) |\n| 16 | MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor
-- |\n| 17 | MS.
SEARLES:
Can
we
know
what
he's
showing |\n| 18 | her? |\n| 19 | MR.
MOSS:
This
is
PX
43.
They
have
a |\n| 20 | relevance
objection,
not
an
authenticity
objection,
to |\n| 21 | I
this
document,
your
Honor.
It's
in
the
exhibit
binders. |\n| 22 | (Whereupon,
an
exhibit
was
displayed
tl
the |\n| 23 | Court.
) |\n| 24 | MS.
SEARLES:
It's
the
same
relevance |\n| 25 | objection
that
I
gave
before
with
respect
to
the |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n44\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n| 1 | you~
pledges.
This
does
not
have
to
do
with
what
Honor |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | you
laid
out
in
our
last
oral
argument
that
wantld
to |\n| 3 | hear
today.
It
was
the
timing
and
the
purchase
lnd
sale |\n| 4 | of
the
apartment.
I
think
that
there
is
no
disprte
at |\n| 5 | this
point
between
any
of
the
parties
that
at
one
point |\n| 6 | there
were
pledges
on
the
apartment,
and
at
this
point |\n| 7 | there
are
no
pledges
on
the
apartment,
so
I
don't
know |\n| 8 | why
we
are
continuing
to
discuss
this.
It's
not
an |\n| 9 | actual
encumbrance
if
the
pledge
doesn't
exist. |\n| 10 | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
if
they
want
to |\n| 11 | stipulate
that
the
pledge
that
she
swore
was
on
had
been |\n| 12 | terminated
before
she
filed
her
affidavit,
I;m
hkppy
to |\n| 13 | do
that,
to
avoid
wasting
time. |\n| 14 | MS.
SEARLES:
No.
I'm
not
going
to
st~pulate |\n| 15 | to
that,
but
I
will
stipulate
that
since
she
combleted |\n| 16 | I
her
affidavit,
and
since
we
have
had
oral
argument,
and |\n| 17 | I
don't
know
however
many
months
of
prejudgment |\n| 18 | attachment
discovery,
that
the
pledge
has
been
l~fted, |\n| 19 | and
I
don't
think
we
are
in
any
disagreement
on
hhat. |\n| 20 | THE
COURT:
This
is
a
document
that
sats
that |\n| 21 | the
pledge
has
been
released.
You
don't
dispute
that. |\n| 22 | So
why
are
we
wasting
time? |\n| 23 | MS.
SEARLES:
That
was
my
question
as
to
why |\n| 24 | we
are
continuing
to
discuss
something
-- |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
I'm
taking
your
representation
as
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n45\n\na stipulation that the pledge was released, so there's no need for there to be any questioning about tJiS document.\n\nMS. SEARLES: I just want to be 100 percent clear, not that I'm making that r~presentation, lhere is no pledge in place. It was released.\n\n7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 There is a discrepancy between documenis that they obtained from DC and documents we obtained from B.V.I, that had a discrepancy at one po;nt, • wherle our document was dated close in time to theirs, and It's said that the pledge hadn't been released. Theils did. We argued at the time that the B.V.I was the applopriate one. We have pulled that from, you know, outSidl help. We didn't pull it ourselves.\n\n15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 At this point in time, though, there are no pledges, and we are all in agreement on that, anh so I I want to be clear that there is a discrepancy as fO some of the documents, and the timing of the pledge, but the pledge has been lifted for months at this point, so again, I'm just cbnfused as to why we are continuing to go into this, because if the argument is the encumbrance, pursuant to the CPLR, there is no encumbrance.\n\n24 25 THE COURT: This is a one-day hearing. It's now an hour and a half into the hearing, a third of\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n46\n\n| 1 | which
has
been
attorney
coll~q~y,
and/or
regurgifation |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | of
what's
in
two
sets
of
papers.
You
are
stipulating |\n| 3 | there's
no
extant
pledge
on
this
apartment,
so
I
don't |\n| 4 | know
what
relevance
this
particular
document
has
to |\n| 5 | anything. |\n| 6 | She
stipulated
that
there's
no
extant
pledge. |\n| 7 | MR.
MOSS:
Can
I
respond,
your
Honor,
bn |\n| 8 | relevance,
your
Honor? |\n| 9 | THE
COURT:
Yes. |\n| 10 | fO
MR.
MOSS:
Ms.
Wang's
affidavit
swore
the |\n| 11 | Court
that
the
pledge
was
on,
and
a
year
before
her |\n| 12 | affidavit
the
pledge
had
been
terminated,
so
it,b
a |\n| 13 | false
statement
to
the
Court
about
the
existence
of
a |\n| 14 | pledge
in
the
courts
of
this-proceeding
in
order
to
try |\n| 15 | to
avoid
an
attachment,
it
goes
directly
to
credibility. |\n| 16 | It
goes
directly
to
fraud. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Well-- |\n| 18 | MR.
MOSS:
I
can
move
on,
your
Honor.
If |\n| 19 | that's
preferable,
I'm
happy
to
move
on. |\n| 20 | Q
Ms.
Wang,
I
take
it
you
never
saw
that
document |\n| 21 | before
you
filed
your
affidavit;
right?
The
document
you |\n| 22 | have
in
front
of
you? |\n| 23 | A
Which
document? |\n| 24 | PX
43,
you
never
saw?
Q |\n| 25 | A
Even
now,
let
me
tell
you,
I
don't
remember
that. |\n| | |\n\n# **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n47\n\n1 2 Yes. And let me repeat again, if I may, I to Golden Spring. This is not my choice. am adminis1trator Because Chinese 3 Communist Party, they kidnap almost all my colleague, between 4 me and the company. So my background, I do not have real estate professional knowledge. 5 6 financial professional\" knowledge. I do not have American I So I was the onl¥ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 person, by then, speak at least a little bit\" English, and try to help the family, so that's why. A lot of my colleague, they are either kidnapped, or disappeared, or just le~t I without saying anything, drop off their stuff on my table. I spent a long time trying to learn and diglst and figure out what they are, and I'm not good about readlng documents. Even now, sir, you show me this, and I'm buper nervous here, that if you do not point where the Pledke, that word, I still couldn't recognize this as one of the dLcuments 16 passed by my hands. Because really, my background is here, 17 I'm not a liar, and I never forge anything, and why I'm here, 18 I'm trying to help, to help the case. Thank you, sir. 19 20 Q . Thank you. MR. MOSS: Nothing further right now, your 21 Honor. 22 CROSS EXAMINATION 23 BY MS. SEARLES: 24 Q Good morning, Ms. Wang. I'm going to try to speak 25 up, so you can hear me. Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n| | 48
by
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Searles |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | MS.
SEARLES:
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
step |\n| 2 | back
for
just
a
quick
second
to
give
a
better |\n| 3 | understanding
of
something
for
your
Honor. |\n| 4 | When
did
you
first
start
working
for
the
Guo
Q |\n| 5 | Family? |\n| 6 | A
I
started
working
for
Guo
Family
from
2009
when
I |\n| 7 | was
in
Beijing.
I
came
back
from
Europe.
I
finished
my |\n| 8 | university,
and
I
came
back
to
Beijing,
start
working
for
the |\n| 9 | Guo
Family. |\n| 10 | And
when
you
say
Guo
Family,
you
mean
more
than
Q |\n| 11 | Mr.
Kwok's
immediate
family;
correct? |\n| 12 | A
Correct
Guo
Family,
what
I
learned,
there
are |\n| 13 | more
than
100
people,
and
Mr.
Kwok,
Miles
Kwok,
he
is
number |\n| 14 | seven
son
of
the
whole
family.
He
has
more
elder
brother, |\n| 15 | and
he
has
his
parents.
He
has
his
niece,
nephews,
ahd |\n| 16 | sister-in-law,
which
right
now
he
has
number
five
and
number |\n| 17 | six
brother,
and
they
are
still
in
jail.
They
are
arrested |\n| 18 | and
put
in
jail
by
Chinese
Communist
Party,
and
a
lot
of
his |\n| 19 | family
member,
including
his
son,
his
daughter,niece, |\n| 20 | I
nephew,
and
his
sister-in-law,
brothers,
they
were
all |\n| 21 | threatened,
kidnapped,
and
put
in
jail
without
any
relson |\n| 22 | I
until
now,
including
all
of
his,
like,
long-term
employee, |\n| 23 | just
like
me. |\n| 24 | And
this
Guo
Family
that
you
work
for,
they
are
Q |\n| 25 | located
in
multiple
places
around
the
world
including
China, |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 50 of 126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff. - Cross by Searles**\n\n49\n\n1 2 3 including the individuals you were just speaking abOU1 ? A Correct. They live in china, Mainland chini' they do, and live in, like Hong Kong, like Europe, like and 4 America. Worldwide. 5 Q And when did you move to New York to start working 6 for the Guo Family? 7 8 9 A That was a date I never forget. That was April 23rd, I came to New York and U.S. I never be I 2015. able to I go back to China and see my family, and see my son. When I 10 was left -- when I left China, then my son is 1.5, is one 11 years old, five months. Now he is going to be, like, six 12 13 14 years old, and he is going to be, go to the school. family, my husband and my son, stopped talking with 2017, which is for now more than 16 months, I heard And my ml since nhthing 15 from them, I received nothing from them. 16 17 Chinese Communist Party, they forged a lot things they forged my voice, my tape, my documents. of my I '['hey 18 forged all my personal information. They threaten my 19 husband. They detain my husband, interrogating my husband. 20 They told my husband I betray my country, I betray my family, 21 I abandon my son and my family, which I never agree. So my 22 23 24 25 husband stopped talking with me since the end of 2017, and my ~on stopped talking and seeing me by WhatsApp, by wec~at, by video, more than 16 months until now. I came here because of two reasons. First, I'm a Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 51 of 126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Cross by Searles**\n\n50\n\n1 2 loyal person. My husband in college, and I went to is my first boyfriend. I meet school in France with him, lnd him we 3 studied together. We get married, and I never have a second 4 5 6 7 8 boyfriend. I never have second husband at all. I to~d him . 1 . \" h ,I . many t1mes, I'm not eav1ng you. I'm Just 1n t e s1tuat10n I 1 Ch ' C ' . hi, cannot contro. But 1nese ommun1st Party, t ey cont1nue I to threaten him and his whole family, and they force my husband divorce me.\n\n9 10 11 12 13 14 This is the third time they are trying. Last month, my husband lawyer contacted me via my elder br~ther, because my husband stop talking to me like more than ~ike 16 I months. My younger brother told me, Sister, they want to divorce you, and they need you appear in the court in China. I say, It's not possible, because Chinese Communist Party is 15 looking for me. I cannot go back to China.\n\n16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Then they come back, say that, Sister they want to you make a video with your passport and your, like, statement, saying, Okay, I'm willing to divorce with my husband. I told my younger brother, it's not going tl happen like this way, because Chinese Communist Party, they llreadY forged a lot of my video and my voice. If I ever madf this video, and saying in front of camera, I'm willing to divorce I my husband, and one day -- my son is six years old, now. He is going to be bigger, and he is going to be adult, ahd that I video will be forged and used by Chinese Communist Party\n\n| | 51
by
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Searles |\n|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | again,
again,
again,
in
the
words.
I
cannot,
one
day,
my
son |\n| 2 | standing
in
front
of
me
and
ask
me,
Mom,
it
was
you
gave
up |\n| 3 | me
,
and
abandon
me. |\n| 4 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
That's
enough. |\n| 5 | THE
WITNESS:
Sorry. |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
That's
not
responsive
to
the |\n| 7 | question. |\n| 8 | THE
WITNESS:
Sorry,
sorry.
Sorry.
Sorry, |\n| 9 | your
Honor. |\n| 10 | Okay.
We'll
change
track
just
a
little
bit;
okay?
Q |\n| 11 | I
So
you
have
said
you
have
been
here
since
2015
in |\n| 12 | New
York
City,
working
for
the
Guo
Family? |\n| 13 | A
Correct.
No.
I
work
for
Guo
Family
from
2009,
and |\n| 14 | since
April
23rd,
2015
I
came
to
America,
continue
WOlk
for |\n| 15 | Guo
Family,
and
Mr.
Kwok
himself. |\n| 16 | And
currently
you
are
president
of
Golden
Spring
Q |\n| 17- | New
York;
correct? |\n| 18 | A
Yes. |\n| 19 | Q
And
what
does
Golden
Spring
New
York
do
for
the
Guo |\n| 20 | Family? |\n| 21 | A
Golden
Spring
New
York
came
back
to
life
sirce
I |\n| 22 | took
over,
and
that
was
in
the
beginning
of
2018.
Before |\n| 23 | that,
Golden
Spring
New
York
employee
either
left,
lite |\n| 24 | quitted,
like
disappeared.
So
there's
lots
of
like
leftover |\n| 25 | issue
I
have
to
handle,
and
since
I
start
to
work
for
Golden |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 53 of 126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Cross by Searles**\n\n52\n\n| 1 | Spring
New
York,
I
make,
or
I
define,
I
define
Golden
Spring | | | |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|\n| 2 | New
York
as
Guo
Family
family
office,
so
I
start
to
cbllect | | | |\n| 3 | everything
and
operate. | | | |\n| 4 | So
among
your
responsibilities,
you
collect
Q | | | |\n| 5 | documents
and
operate
the
entity? | | | |\n| 6 | A
Correct.
Yeah. | | | |\n| 7 | What'
are
some
of
your
other
responsibilitie.s
for
Q | | | |\n| 8 | the
Guo
Family? | | | |\n| 9 | Sorry.
What
is
your
question?
A | | | |\n| 10 | What
are
some
of
your
other
responsibilitiels
for
Q | | | |\n| 11 | Golden
Spring,
for
the
Guo
Family,
in
your
role
as
prjSident? | | | |\n| 12 | A
Other
responsibility,
including
like
build
a
team; | | | |\n| 13 | and
including,
like,
help
all
the
litigation;
help
to
collect | | | |\n| 14 | the
documents
and
collect
information;
and
help
to
do,
like, | | | |\n| 15 | daily
operation,
every
day. | | | |\n| 16 | Q
So
when
you
say
daily
operation,
do
you
mean
making | | | |\n| 17 | I eve;rybody
sure
the
bills
are
paid
on
time,
making
sure
that | | | |\n| 18 | else
knows
what
they
are
supposed
to
be
doing? | | | |\n| 19 | A
Correct.
Because
a
lot
of,
like,
because
of
my | | | |\n| 20 | previously
colleague,
as
I
said,
they
just
disappeared,
gone, | | | |\n| 21 | so
a
lot
of,
like,
outstanding
questions,
bills,
issuls,
that | | | |\n| 22 | when
I
came
in,
I
start
to
work
for
Golden
Spring,
it's | | | |\n| 23 | almost
everything
back
to
the
track,
so
I
can
see,
and
I'm | | | |\n| 24 | proud
of
that. | | | |\n| 25 | Q
You
have
testified
here
this
morning
quite
a
bit
I | | | |\n\n| | 126 |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | 53
by
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Searles |\n| 1 | about
this
idea
of
personal
knowledge,
and
I
believe
Ithe
term |\n| 2 | difference
in
you
used
was
gathered
knowledge.
Is
there
a |\n| 3 | your
mind
between
those
two? |\n| 4 | THE
COURT:
I
understand
the
difference. |\n| 5 | MS.
SEARLES:
Okay. |\n| 6 | I
think
you
might
have
it
in
front
of
you,
if
you
Q |\n| 7 | need
to
reference
it.
It
is
Exhibit
34,
the
affidavit
which |\n| 8 | is
not
in'evidence. |\n| 9 | the
Prior
to
submitting
this
affidavit
before |\n| 10 | I
were
part
Court,
did
you
gather
the
underlying
documents
that |\n| 11 | of
the
exhibits? |\n| 12 | Correct.
All
the
exhibits,
they
are
all
pa,rt
of
my
A |\n| 13 | gathered
documents. |\n| | Did
you
review
the
documents,
look
at
them,
read
Q |\n| 15 | them,
before
you
submitted
that
affidavit? |\n| 16 | A
I
didn't
review
all
of
them,
because
first
I
gather |\n| 17 | a
lot
of
documents.
Second,
as
I
said,
my
third
language
is |\n| 18 | English,
so
if
you
listen
to
my
speaking,
maybe
just,
like,
I |\n| 19 | speak
not
bad
English,
but
when
you
have
me
read
all
of
this, |\n| 20 | like,
very
legal
or
official
documents,
and
I
could
not |\n| 21 | understand
them,
like,
very
quickly,
I
have
to
look
jt
my |\n| 22 | dictionary
and
try
to
figure
out
what
they
are
talkiJ9. |\n| 23 | Q
Did
you
speak
with
others
about
those
docuJents, |\n| 24 | others
within
the
Golden
Spring
or
Guo
Family
organizllations, |\n| 25 | about
those
documents
before
you
submitted
your
affidavit?
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | 54
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Searles
by | |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| 1 | A
I
collect
these
documents
from
them. | |\n| 2 | And
you
spoke
with
others
about
those
documents?
Q | |\n| 3 | MR.
MOSS:
Objection.
Leading. | |\n| 4 | Yes.
A | |\n| 5 | MS.
SEARLES:
She's
not
my
witness. | |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
It's
an
adverse
witness. | |\n| 7 | Look,
what
I'm
understanding
is
that
this | |\n| 8 | IShe
witness
has
no
personal
knowledge
of
anything.
has | |\n| 9 | I
a!l.l
of
collected
a
lot
of
information,
some,
most,
gr | |\n| 10 | which
she
understood,
and
the
affidavit
that
she
signed | |\n| 11 | is
based
on
her
understanding,
as
limited
by
her | |\n| 12 | language
issues,
of
what
lawyers
put
in
front
of
her
to | |\n| 13 | sign.
Is
there
anything
else
I
need
to
know
about
her | |\n| 14 | testimony? | |\n| 15 | I
would
just
direct
you
to
the
first
paragraph
on | |\n| 16 | I
there,
speaking
about
the
personal
knowledge
issue.
[sn't
it | |\n| 17 | correct
that
that
paragraph
does
not
actually
say
thah
it's | |\n| 18 | based
on
personal
knowledge? | |\n| 19 | -
-
A
You
mean | |\n| 20 | The
first
paragraph
of
your
affidavit.
Q | |\n| 21 | A
The
first
paragraph. | |\n| 22 | term,
Yes.
The
Based
on
my
personal
knowledge,
Q | |\n| 23 | does
not
exist
in
that
document;
correct? | |\n| 24 | THE
COURT:
Okay. | |\n| 25 | A
Correct.
Sorry. | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n| | Wang.
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
by
Searles | 55 |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 1 | THE
WITNESS:
Sorry.
Sorry,
sir. | |\n| 2 | MS.
SEARLES:
I'm
switching
topics
now,
your | |\n| 3 | 'Honor.
Just
so
that
we
are
clear. | |\n| 4 | Has
the
apartment
that's
at
issue
here
in
this
Q | |\n| 5 | hearing,
has
that
been
sold? | |\n| 6 | A
No. | |\n| 7 | To
your
knowledge,
is
it
even
on
the
market
right
Q | |\n| 8 | now? | |\n| 9 | Correct.
I
have
this
personal
knowledge.
A | |\n| 10 | And
this
knowledge,
meaning
it
is
or
isn't
on
the
Q | |\n| 11 | market? | |\n| 12 | A
It's
not
on
the
market
at
all. | |\n| 13 | MS.
SEARLES:
I
think
that's
it,
your
Honor. | |\n| 14 | I
MR.
MOSS:
One
more
quest~on,
your
Honor? | |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
Yes. | |\n| 16 | RE-DIRECT
EXAMINATION | |\n| 17 | BY
MR.
MOSS: | |\n| 18 | When
was
the
apartment
taken
off
the
market?
Q | |\n| 19 | ,
I
A
About
one
month.
Around,
like,
one
month
off
the | |\n| 20 | market,
from
now.
About,
like,
one
month
ago. | |\n| 21 | MR.
MOSS:
I
have
nothing
else. | |\n| 22 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
You
may
step
down. | |\n| 23 | (Whereupon,
the
witness
was
excused
from
the | |\n| 24 | witness
stand.) | |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
Next
witness. | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n### 56 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Re-Direct by Moss** 1 (Whereupon, there was a pause in the 2 proceedings.) 3 4 5 THE COURT: When you get the witness, ¥ou will let me know. (Whereupon, a recess was taken.) 6 \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* 7 MICHAEL U L L MAN, having been duly sworn b¥ the B clerk, was examined and testified as follows: 9 10 11 12 13 THE.CLERK: Please state your full name and address, in a loud clear voice. THE WITNESS: Michael Ullman, 340 West 57th Street, apartment BG, New York, New'York 10019. THE CLERK: Have a seat. 14 DIRECT EXAMINATION 15 BY MR. SARNOFF: 16 Q Good morning, Mr. Ullman. We are a little bit 17 behind, so I'm going try to move this along. 1B 19 20 21 22 23 A Q A Q A Are you employed, sir? I am. By who? The Sherry-Netherland. What is your position there? My title is Executive vice President, Chief 24 Operating Officer. 25 Q Is that effectively akin to the Lisa A. Casey - Official Court\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n| | | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff | 57 |\n|-----|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|\n| 1 | A | Yes,
it
is. | |\n| 2 | Q | How
long
have
you
held
that
position? | |\n| 3 | A | At
the
Sherry? | |\n| 4 | Q | Yes. | |\n| 5 | A | Nine
years. | |\n| 6 | Q | So
about
since
2010? | |\n| 7 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 8 | Q | How
long
have
you
been
in
the
hotel
management | |\n| 9 | business? | | |\n| 10 | A | A
little
over
40
years. | |\n| 11 | Q | As
your
general
manager
role,
COO
general | manager |\n| 12 | role,
are | \"
h
1
you
involved
in
the
new
purc
ase
app
~cat~on | I |\n| 13 | process? | | |\n| 14 | A | I'm
involved
in
putting
together
the
documentation | |\n| 15 | to
make | sure
that
it's
all
there
before
I
ship
it
off | to
the |\n| 16 | board | members. | |\n| 17 | Q | And
roughly
how
many
apartment
transactions, | |\n| 18 | purchases | and
sales
have
yo~
been
involved
with
in
yotr | |\n| 19 | tenure
at | the
Sherry-Netherland? | |\n| 20 | A | 60. | |\n| 21 | Q | Does
the
Sherry-Netherland
have
a
Board
of | |\n| 22 | Directors? | | |\n| 23 | A | Yes,
it
does. | |\n| 24 | Q | And
does
have
a
president
or
a
chairperson? | |\n| 2.5 | A | It
has
president. | |\n| | | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 59 of\n\n**Ullman. for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff**\n\n126\n\nAnd who is the president?\n\n1\n\n.Q\n\n58\n\n2 3 A Q Michael Horvitz. And has he been the president. since Mr. Kwok's 4 purchase in 2015? 5 6 7 A Q A Yes. And what is Mr. Horvitz's background, generally? He's a former partner for Jones Day, as an 8 9 10 11 12 attorney. He is on the -- a trustee of the Frick. He is, I I think, a trustee of the Cleveland Clinic, and a former chairman of IMG International Management. Q Is the board of the Sherry-Netherland responsible for reviewing and approving apartment purchase apPlicktionS? 13 14 15 16 A Q Not in A Yes. Could you generally describe the approval process? amaz~ng , deta~,'I but Just .' to g~ve , the Court an ~I'dea. Yes. So there's a selling and purchasing bloker 17 that, they bring the client. The property is listed. They 18 19 20 bring the client. They agree on a price review the minutes of the board meetings the building. Then they put together and on terms. They and the condltion of they come to us to 21 22 ask for a package, what's required in the package. that board package together, and when it's all put They put I together, 23 they submit it to us. 24 Q And what type of information is included in 25 THE COURT: I know all about this. I las the\n\n| | 59
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | president
of
a
New
York
City
co-op
for
12
years. |\n| 2 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Duly
noted. |\n| 3 | THE
COURT:
We
can
skip
it. |\n| 4 | Do
you
know
who
Kwok
Ho
Wan
is,
or
Miles
Kwok?
Q |\n| 5 | Yes.
A |\n| 6 | Did
the
there
come
a
time
when
he
applied
to
Q |\n| 7 | purchase
an
apartment
in
the
Sherry-Netherland? |\n| 8 | Yes.
A |\n| 9 | You
do
you
recall
when,
about,
that
was?
Q |\n| 10 | A
It
was
early
2015.
I
believe
it
was
Februa~y
of |\n| 11 | 2015. |\n| 12 | Did
Mr.
Kwok
go
through
the,
sort
of,
typical
Q |\n| 13 | application
process? |\n| 14 | A
Yes. |\n| 15 | Did
he
provide
financial
information
to
the
board?
Q |\n| 16 | A
Yes. |\n| 17 | Do
you
recall,
basically,
what
type
of
financial
Q |\n| 18 | information
he
provided? |\n| 19 | A
He
provided,
the
first
time
--
the
first
time
that |\n| 20 | I
It
he
provided
information
--
which
I
only
saw
afterwards. |\n| 21 | was
confidential.
It
was
kept
in
a
folder
and
I
gave
it
to |\n| 22 | the
board
president,
but
it
was
documentation,
I
believe
that |\n| 23 | was
in
Renminbi
and
that
was
mainly
in
Chinese,
and
sl
that |\n| 24 | I
was
the
first
document
that
was
sent.
The
board
met
on
it |\n| 25 | and
subsequently
asked
for
more
detailed
financial |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22
Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18
Page 61 of |\n|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 60 |\n| | by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff |\n| 1 | information
in
U.S.
dollars. |\n| 2 | Q
When
you'submitted
that
application
informarion, |\n| 3 | did
you
understand
that
he
was
purporting
to
own
or
control |\n| 4 | that
information? |\n| 5 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 6 | understanding
is
not
relevant.
The
documents
for |\n| 7 | themselves.
They
are
all
in
evidence. |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained. |\n| 9 | Did
Mr.
Kwok
show
the
Sherry-Netherland
any
Q |\n| 10 | information
about
any
assets
he
purported
to
hold
in
the |\n| 11 | United
States? |\n| 12 | A
No. |\n| 13 | Did
he
provide
the
Sherry-Netherl~nd
with
any
Q |\n| 14 | assets
that
he
purported
to
hold
in
his
own
name? |\n| 15 | No.
A |\n| 16 | Do
you
recall
any
other
prospective
Q |\n| 17 | Sherry-Netherland
purchaser,
both
not
showing
assets
in
their |\n| 18 | h

d
I
h
own
name,
and
not
s
ow~ng
assets
~n
t
e
Un~te
States? |\n| 19 | No~
A |\n| 20 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 21 | Q
So
is
it
fair
to
say
that
-- |\n| 22 | THE
COURT:
There's
an
objection. |\n| 23 | What
relevance
is
that
to
anything? |\n| 24 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Uniqueness
of
his
application, |\n| 25 | and
whether
or
not
the
Sherry-Netherland
found
i~ |\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**I**\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 62 of 126\n\n| | 61
by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | necessary,
in
the
light
of
all
-- |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
You
can
ask
him
what
the |\n| 3 | Sherry-Netherland,
did
but
they
approved
the
purchase. |\n| 4 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Okay. |\n| 5 | Q
Excluding
Mr.
Kwok,
during
your
tenure
at
the |\n| 6 | I
Sherry-Netherland,
has
any
tenant
used
a
double
LLC
structure |\n| 7 | to
buy
an
apartment? |\n| 8 | No.
A |\n| 9 | And
excusing
Mr.
Kwok,
had
any
tenant
ever
used
a
Q |\n| 10 | foreign
LLC
structure
to
buy
an
apartment? |\n| 11 | A
No. |\n| 12 | Q
You
mentioned
a
minute
ago
that
he
didn't
show
any |\n| 13 | U.S.
assets.
Did
the
Sherry-Netherland
impose
any
palticular |\n| 14 | conditions
or
safeguards
on
his
purchase
as
a
result? |\n| 15 | Yes.
A |\n| 16 | Do
you
recall
what
those
safeguards
were?
Q |\n| 17 | A
Yes.
There
was
a
security
deposit
covering
a |\n| 18 | five-year
period,
for
estimated
maintenance
charges. |\n| 19 | Do
you
remember
what
the
amount
of
the
security
Q |\n| 20 | deposit
was? |\n| 21 | It
was
approximately
million.
A
'\\$3.3 |\n| 22 | Do
you
recall
whether
Mr.
Kwok
was
also
asked
to
Q |\n| 23 | sign
an
occupancy
agreement? |\n| 24 | A
Yes. |\n| 25 | Was
he
also
asked
to
personally
guarantee
the
Q |\n| | I
Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n62 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 proprietary lease? 2 3 4 A Q A Yes. How was the size of the secure deposit derired? It was derived by the board having a meeting, and I 5 believe it was actually -- 6 7 B MR. HARMON: Objection, has personal knowledge, he's just the board did. And relevance. your Honor. Unless he. testifying abolt what 9 10 11 12 THE COURT: Look, let's not nitpick. ['m not even sure what the relevance of any of this testlmony is. Go ahead. Answer it. 13 A It was -- I sat in the board meeting where, I 14 15 16 17 1B 19 20 21 22 believe it was actually prior to that, the law firm that was dealing with Mr. Kwok's purchase one of the firms, I hhink, offered that, and I believe Mr. Kwok offered that ank the board had discussed what the right amount would be', anld then five years, they thought, was adequate to cover; sincl there were no assets in the U.S., that if Mr. Kwok didn't ply the 'maintenance, we had adequate coverage to protect oursllves. Q Before changing gears, do you recall anythihg about the timeline of Mr. Kwok's application and closing? 23 24 A Q Yes. Did Mr. Kwok put any time constraints on that 25 process? **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 63 of 126\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 64 of 126\n\n| | by
Ullman.
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff | 63 |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|\n| 1 | A
Yes. | |\n| 2 | Could
you
tell
us
about
that?
Q | |\n| 3 | A
I
believe
it
began
in
February,.
and
it
had | ,0
close |\n| 4 | by
March
6th.
Having
gone
back
in
my
notes,
I
think | ~t
was |\n| 5 | March
6th
that
it
had
to
close
by,
or
he
could
cancel | a |\n| 6 | .contract,
and
I
think
it
was
my
understanding,
from | what
I |\n| 7 | remember
hearing,
it
was
for
feng
shui
reasons,
that | It
had |\n| 8 | to
close. | |\n| 9 | Did
that
type
of
timing
--
was
that
type
of
Q | typing |\n| 10 | typical
of
applications
at
the
Sherry-Netherland? | |\n| 11 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. | What
is |\n| 12 | this
relevant
to? | |\n| 13 | THE
COURT:
It's
not
relevant
to
anything, | but |\n| 14 | go
ahead.
It's
not
typical.
Okay.
Next. | |\n| 15 | Had
any
prospective
purchaser
asked
to
close
Q | in |\n| 16 | that
short
a
time? | |\n| 17 | No.
A | |\n| 18 | Q
After
Mr.
Kwok
closed
and
moved
in,
did
there | come. |\n| 19 | d
a
time
what
he
sought
to
draw
down
on
his
secur~ty | I
epos~t? |\n| 20 | Yes.
A | |\n| 21 | Do
you
recall
when
that
was,
approximately?
Q | |\n| 22 | A
Within
a
year
of
closing, | |\n| 23 | Do
you
recall,
roughly,
of
the
3
million,
I
Q | think |\n| 24 | you
said
\\$3.3
million
security
deposit,
how
much
he | wanted
to |\n| 25 | draw
down? | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n### 64 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 A Q I believe it was approximately 2.3 million. And did the Sherry-Netherland accede to that 3 request, to your knowledge? 4 A No. 5 6 Q Has any other purchaser of apartment, shortly after purchasing, a Sherry-Netherland sought to withdrlw their 7 security deposit? 8 9 A Q No. Did there come a time whether Mr. Kwok, or someone 10 acting on his behalf, inquired about transferring the title 11 of the apartment? 12 13 A Q Yes. What do you recall about that? 14 15 A I recall first that his broker, Kathy Sloane, had I approached me and said, can they transfer the apartment to 16 his son, Mileson Kwok's, name. 17 Q Was it in his name, or was it in a trust for his 18 name? 19 A At the time they didn't say to trust. They just 20 said they wanted to transfer it to Mileson. 21 22 23 Q A Q And Mileson is Mr. Kwok's son; correct? Correct. Did there come a time when you learned that the A 24 25 request was to transfer to a trust for ,Mr. Kwok's son? Yes, when I received a letter from an attorhey I in\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 66 of 126\n\n- -----------------------------------,-----------\n\n| by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff
1
England,
I
believe
a
Ms.
Mannis,
I
believe,
asking
questions
2
on
how
they
could
do
the
transfer.
3
And
the
request
was
how
to
set
up
a
transfe~
from
Q
4
Mr.
Kwok
to
Mr.
Kwok'
s
son?
Correct.
5
A
A
trust
for
Mr.
Kwok's
son?
6
Q
7
Yes.
That's
correct.
A
8
And
did
the
Sherry-Netherland
respond
to
that
Q
9
request?
10
Yes.
A
11
How
did
the
Sherry-Netherland
respond?
Q
12
We
told
them
how
it
could
be
done,
that
his
son
A
13
would
have
to
go
through
the
application
process
and
provide
14
all
of
the
documentation
that
he
had
provided,
that
M~.
Kwok
15
had
provided,
when
he
purchased
the
apartment,
and
thly
could
16
go
through
that
process.
17
So
that
was
a
re-board
approval
process?
Q
18
A
That's
correct.
19
And
that
was
consistent
with
the
board's
standard
Q
20
practice
in
situations
such
as
that?
21
A
Yes.
22
Did
Mr.
Kwok
every
end
up
submitting
a
transfer
Q
23
application?
24
A
No.
25
Did
he
or
his
representatives
make
any
other
Q
I
Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| | 65 |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n66 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 requests about the apartment in the period that followed? 2 3 A Q Not that I recall. Well, did there come a time when Mr. Kwok inquired 4 about making his son the contact person? 5 6 A Yes. MR. HARMON: Objection. Leading. He answered 7 8 9 10 11 the question that he made no other requests. THE COURT: I'm sorry? MR. HARMON: Leading. The witness has already answered that Mr. Kwok made no other requests. Now he is leading the witness into a different answer. 12 13 14 MR. SARNOFF: deposition testimony to would like. I can show the witness His refresh\" his recollectioj, if he 15 16 MR. HARMON: Deposition testimony isn't\" the answer to what he is asking. 17 18 19 Q A 20 representatives asking whether they could change the contact 21 person, and could they make it his son, as the contaot 22 person. 23 Q And this was on the heels of asking to transfer 24 title to his son, in a trust for his son; correct? 25 A Yes. Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 68 of\n\n67 **Ullman. for Plaintiff. Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 THE COURT: What do you mean by contact person? THE WITNESS: In the apartment, they had contact people. They had administrative people fhat, if we needed to get in touch with them, that's who re should go through. There were a couple of different people, and then they asked if they could change it to his son. THE COURT: Okay. 10 Q Did you have a view as to what Mr. Kwok may have 11 been trying to accomplish in doing that? 12 13 14 MR. HARMON: Objection, your Honor. What his view is, again, is irrelevant. THE COURT: I agree. That's sustained. 15 Q When Mr. Kwok purchased the apartment, did he and 16 Genever execute any agreements with the building? 17 A Other than the occupancy agreement and the security 18 deposit and the -- occupancy, security and personal 19 guarantee, those are the three documents, plus signing the 20 proprietary lease. Q 22 lease? And the Sherry-Netherland signed the proprietary 23 24 A Q That's correct. And Mr. Kwok personally signed the occupancy 25 agreement; correct? Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n68 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 A Q I believe that's correct; yes. And that was an agreement with the 3 Sherry-Netherland, and that document was in English, and 4 Mr. Kwok signed it; correct? 5 A That's correct. 6 7 Q Do you recall lease and the occupancy 8 do, and if you could pledge your apartment? is not the subject of this action. 9 10 11 12 MR. HARMON: Objection, or not Mr. Kwok's actions violate the relevance. your Honor. Whether . I the proprietar¥ lease I I don't understand 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 THE COURT: I'm sorry? Mr. Kwok purchased the apartment in his own name. MR. HARMON: Y,?s. THE COURT: He signed the proprietary !lease. MR. HARMON: Yes. THE COURT: He signed the occupancy agreement. I He signed the personal guarantee. The rules of the Sherry-Netherland are that you can't pledge the apartment. Mr. Kwok pledged the apartment. Did you find out about that? THE WITNESS: Later, yes. THE COURT: Okay. 25 Q How did you learn about that? **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 69 of 126\n\n| | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22
Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18
Page 70 of |\n|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 69 |\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff |\n| 1 | A
When
we
were
served
the
papers
from
O'Melveny
is |\n| 2 | the
first
that
we
knew
that,
that
we
read
that
the
aplrtment |\n| 3 | had
been
pledged. |\n| 4 | And
the
papers
that
you
saw
were
the
papers
that
Q |\n| 5 | Mr.
Kwok
had
signed,
that
his
lawyers
had
sent
in,
too; |\n| 6 | right? |\n| 7 | A
Yes. |\n| 8 | Can
you
direct
your
attention
to
PX
33?
Q |\n| 9 | (Whereupon,
an
exhibit
was
displayed
to
the |\n| 10 | Court.
) |\n| 11 | A
Okay. |\n| 12 | MR.
HARMON:
I
don't
have
a
PX
33
in
my
book. |\n| 13 | That
was
provided
by
your
firm? |\n| 14 | MR.
SARNOFF:
It's
your
brief. |\n| 15 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the |\n| 16 | witness.
) |\n| 17 | Q
I
direct
your
attention
to
page
four,
please. |\n| 18 | f'
\",
I
h
b
MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor,
t
e
r1e
1S
not
in |\n| 19 | evidence.
He
can't
read
from
a
document
that's
hot
in |\n| 20 | I
evidence,
and
he
can't
authenticate
this
document. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
I
don't
have
Exhibit
33. |\n| 22 | MR.
HOPLAMAZIAN:
Your
Honor,
we
have
a
copy |\n| 23 | for
you,
as
well. |\n| 24 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the |\n| 25 | Court.
) |\n\n### 70 **Ullman. for Plaintiff. Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 3 THE COURT: We are not going to have questions about a memorandum of law. Let's move on. MR. SARNOFF: Okay. 4 Q Was it your understanding that in this case 5 Mr. Kwok, through his brief, was representing to the Court 6 that the apartment was pledged? 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MR. HARMON: Objection, your Honor. On multiple grounds. THE COURT: Sustained. Sustained, sustained. MR. SARNOFF: May I address that? THE COURT: Look, we have already established th t M K k h d h d . .11 . a r. wo purc ase t e apartment an , ~n v~o at~on of his proprietary lease, he pledged the apartmeht, and we have established that this witness learned abbut that at a subsequent period of time, and it has been stipulated that, at le~st as of a month ago, the apartment is no longer pledged. Q Did you notify Mr. Kwok that his apartment was pledged in violation of the Sherry-Netherland agreemeht? 20 21 A Yes. THE COURT: When did you do that? 22 23 24 25 THE WITNESS: Shortly after we found out that it had been pledged. THE COURT: Okay. And when was that? THE WITNESS: I'm guessing now, around Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n-------------------------,----------\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 72 of\n\n71 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 3 4 5 6 Q THE COURT: Don't guess. Don't guess. THE WITNESS: - - mid 2017. THE COURT: 2017 is your answer? THE WITNESS: Yes. THE COURT: Okay. Did you get a response from Mr. Kwok or Mr. Kwok's 7 counsel -- 8 9 10 11 A Q Yes. -- with respect to the letter? And how did they respond? MR. HARMON: Objection, your Honor. If it's 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in writing, then document has to be offered, and I would argue that the whole -- THE COURT: I'm sorry? MR. HARMON: If we responded in writing, then we ought to have the exhibit, the document, and hot his testimony. I would object to the document, becalse how he responded to the Sherry-Netherland about this subject is just not relevant to the subject that we are here on today. MR. SARNOFF: I'll show you the exhibit, sir. It's exhibit 35. (Whereupon, a document was handed to the witness. ) MR. HARMON: Your Honor -- Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n### 72 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 Q MR. SARNOFF: I would like to mark Exhibit 35. Is that a copy of the written response that the 3 4 5 Sherry-Netherland, and that you, particularly, recei viedin response to your letter to the Sherry-Nether~and, ad~ising them about the inappropriate pledge? 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A Q Yes. What does the letter say about whether or not THE COURT: The letter -- MR. HARMON: Objection. THE COURT: Are you moving this into ewidence? MR. SARNOFF: Yes. THE COURT: Okay. This is received. It 13 14 speaks for itself. MR. SARNOFF: Okay. 15 Q And it was your understanding that the 16 Sherry-Netherland was being told by Mr. Kwok's counsel 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Q response, THE COURT: I can read. MR. HARMON: Objection, THE COURT: I can read the letter. MR. SARNOFF: Okay. Fair enough. THE COURT: It's in evidence. MR. SARNOFF: Okay. Are you able to reconcile the Sherry-Nether[and's of Mr. Kwok's counsel to the SherrY-Netherllnd, 25 with the position that Mr. Kwok's brief and the Wang Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n#### 72 of 125\n\n| | | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff | 73 |\n|----|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 1 | affidavit | took
with
respect
-- | |\n| 2 | | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained.
That's | |\n| 3 | | sustained. | |\n| 4 | | MR.
HARMON:
Thank
you. | |\n| 5 | Q | Let
me
just
wrap
up
quickly.
Do
you
have
an
ax | to |\n| 6 | grind
with | Mr.
Kwok? | |\n| 7 | A | Absolutely
not. | |\n| 8 | Q | Didn't
he
sue
you? | |\n| 9 | A | He
did. | |\n| 10 | Q | Is
that
of
any
impact
on
your
testimony? | |\n| 11 | A | Absolutely
not. | |\n| 12 | Q | Was
your
purpose
coming
here
today
to
try
to
help | |\n| 13 | PAX
LP
to | win
its
motion? | |\n| 14 | A | No. | |\n| 15 | Q | Did
you
volunteer
to
testify
here,
or
were
you | |\n| 16 | subpoenaed? | | |\n| 17 | A | Subpoenaed. | |\n| 18 | Q | Is
that
the
same
with
your
deposition? | |\n| 19 | A | Yes. | |\n| 20 | Q | Did
you
and
I
communicate
in
advance
about
your | |\n| 21 | testimony? | | |\n| 22 | A | No. | |\n| 23 | Q | Did
you
tell
the
truth
today? | |\n| 24 | A | Yes. | |\n| 25 | Q | Let
me
just.
see
if
I
can
summarize
your
testimony
I | |\n| | | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n| | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22
Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18
Page 75 of |\n|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 74 |\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff
by |\n| 1 | briefly.
I
have
one
ultimate
question
I
would
like
tr
ask |\n| 2 | you,
and
can
you
please
tell
me
if
I've
got
anything
wrong. |\n| 3 | You
testified
he
didn't
show
any
U.S.
assets
or
assetl
in
his. |\n| 4 | own
name;
correct? |\n| 5 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor.
This
is |\n| 6 | •
just
summarizing
the
testimony
that's
already
in
the |\n| 7 | record.
It's
leading,
it's
-- |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained.
I've
heard
his |\n| 9 | testimony. |\n| 10 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Okay. |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
I
don't
need
it
summarized.
Do |\n| 12 | you
have
any
other
questions. |\n| 13 | Did
you
believe
Mr.
Kwok's
behavior
Q |\n| 14 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection. |\n| 15 | with
respect
to
his
apartment
was
typica~?
Q |\n| 16 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained
as
well. |\n| 18 | Q
Did
you
ever
form
a
view
about
what
Mr.
Kwokmay |\n| 19 | have
been
trying
to
accomplish
with
the
apartment? |\n| 20 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained
as
well. |\n| 22 | Thank
you,
Mr.
Ullman.
Q |\n| 23 | MR.
SARNOFF:
I'll
reserve
any
questions
for |\n| 24 | re-direct. |\n| 25 | |\n| | |\n\n74 of 125\n\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff.
Cross
by
Harmon | | 75 |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----|\n| 1 | CROSS
EXAMINATION | | |\n| 2 | BY
MR.
HARMON: | | |\n| 3 | Good
afternoon
Mr.
Ullman.
Q | | |\n| 4 | Good
afternoon.
A | | |\n| 5 | I'm
Mark
Harmon.
We
haven~t
met
before.
I
Q | | |\n| 6 | represent
Mr.
Kwok. | | |\n| 7 | Mr.
Ullman,
would
you
say
that
Mr.
Kwok's | English | |\n| 8 | is
not
very
good? | | |\n| 9 | A
I
--
yes. | | |\n| 10 | And
especially
it
wasn't
good
several
years
Q | ago. | |\n| 11 | It
may
have
gotten
better,
but
it
certainly | | |\n| 12 | It's
gotten
a
lot
better.
A | | |\n| 13 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
Allow
the
question | to
be | |\n| 14 | completed. | | |\n| 15 | THE
WITNESS:
Yes. | | |\n| | Q | | |\n| | A | | |\n| | Q | | |\n| | A | | |\n| | Q | | |\n| | A | | |\n| | Q | | |\n| | that
the | | |\n| 24 | event
that
a
contract
of
sale
is
to
be
signed
for
the | sale | of |\n| 25 | the
apartment;
is
that
correct? | | |\n| | Lisa\"
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 77 of 126\n\n| | 76
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Harmon
by |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | A
That's
correct. |\n| 2 | You
were
given
a
copy
of
that
'order
by
the
Q |\n| 3 | plaintiffs
here;
is
that
correct? |\n| 4 | A
That's
correct. |\n| 5 | Q
So
if
you
knew,
as
the
Chief
Operating
Offirer
of |\n| 6 | the
Sherry-Netherland,
that
Mr.
Kwok
or
Genever
had
entered |\n| 7 | d
I
1nto
a
contract
of
sale,
would
you
so
a
V1se
the
Court? |\n| 8 | Yes.
A |\n| 9 | Because
you
would
want
to
comply
with
that?
Q |\n| 10 | Absolutely.
A |\n| 11 | Q
Okay.
Now
you
also
said
that
you
got
served
papers |\n| 12 | I
that
indicated
to
you
that
Mr.
Kwok
had
placed
a
pledge
on |\n| 13 | the
apartment;
is
that
right? |\n| 14 | A
That's
correct. |\n| 15 | Q
And
isn't
it
true,
Mr.
Ullman,
that
those
papers |\n| 16 | were
delivered
to
you
before
the
order
was
entered
thit |\n| 17 | required
Mr.
Kwok
to
give
notice? |\n| 18 | I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
question.
A |\n| 19 | MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor,
this
will
be
a |\n| 20 | defendant's
exhibit.
Would
you
like
us
to
start
with
A, |\n| 21 | or
Defendant's
1?
I
have
them,
but
I
just
need
to
fill |\n| 22 | in
the
exhibit
number. |\n| 23 | THE
COURT:
Exhibit
1? |\n| 24 | MR.
HARMON:
Defendant's,
Exhibit
A
or
1? |\n| 25 | It's
not
pre-marked. |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n77 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Cross by Harmon** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I'm just asking your Honor for your preference in how we THE COURT: Did you hand up your exhibit book? MR. HARMON: No, your Honor. We have bne exhibit book, and then these are just for cross. This is - - THE COURT: I'm sorry? MR. HARMON: No, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. So then I need a copy of the exhibit. MR. HARMON: I'm going to give it to you. THE COURT: Give it to the court officlr. MR. HARMON: We'll make it Defendant's A. (Whereupon, a document was handed to the Court. ) MR. HARMON: Your Honor, may I hand a copy to the witness? THE COURT: Yes. MR. HARMON: Thank you. (Whereupon, a document was handed to the witness. ) 22 Q Mr. Ullman, you have been handed what's been marked 23 for identification as Defendant's Exhibit A. Can you tell us 24 what it is? 25 A It's an email from my assistant to Ira GilbFrt, Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n78 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Cross by Harmon** 1 copying me, regarding 2 Q Well, don't tell me what it's regarding. Is there 3 an attachment to the email? 4 5 A Q Yes. Is that attachment a copy of a letter that you 6 signed? 7 8 A Q That's my signature. Yes. In your official capacity as Executive vice 9 President and Chief Operating Officer of the 10 Sherry-Netherland; correct? 11 12 A Yes. MR. HARMON: Your Honor, I offer it as 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendant's Exhibit A in evidence. THE COURT: Okay. It's received. MR. SARNOFF: No objection. Q Now, Mr. Ullman, would you like to take a look to your first and second paragraph of the letter? That' slpage two of the exhibit. 19 20 A Q Yes. Do you see that the corporation was provided with a 21 copy of the order on June 29, 2018? 22 23 A Q Yes. And approximately two months before that is when 24 the plaintiffs supplied copies of the documents to you about 126\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n25 their lawsuit with Mr. Kwok; is that correct?\n\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
by
Harmon | 79 |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|\n| 1 | Yes.
A | |\n| 2 | Q
So
the
answer
to
my
earlier
question
was
whether | |\n| 3 | you
received
the
information
about
the
pledge
before
bhe | |\n| 4 | order
was
entered,
and
the
answer
is
yes. | |\n| 5 | A
Yes. | |\n| 6 | Q
And
you
received
it
from
the
plaintiffs,
is | that |\n| 7 | correct?
From
the
plaintiffs
in
this
case? | |\n| 8 | A
Yes. | |\n| 9 | Q
I
know
you
gave
a
fair
amount
of
testimony | about |\n| 10 | the
putting
together
of
the
documents,
amassing
the | |\n| 11 | documents.
I
presume
whatever
financial
information
you | |\n| 12 | received
from
or
on
behalf
of
Mr.
Kwok,
you
turned
ov~r | to |\n| 13 | the
board. | |\n| 14 | That's
correct.
A | |\n| 15 | Q
Is
it
fair
to
say
that
there
was
no
informafion | |\n| 16 | that
was
given
to
you
that
you
didn't
give
to
the
board? | |\n| 17 | A
That's
correct. | |\n| 18 | And
then
the
board
reviewed
the
information~
Q | |\n| 19 | A
That's
correct. | |\n| 20 | And
the
board
then
voted
on
whether
or
not
to
Q | |\n| 21 | accept
Mr.
Kwok
as
a
apartment
owner
at
the | |\n| 22 | Sherry-Netherland? | |\n| 23 | A
That's
correct. | |\n| 24 | And
the
board
voted
the
first
time
that
the
Q | |\n| 25 | information
was
inadequate;
is
that
right? | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 81 of 126\n\n| | | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff.
Cross
by
Harmon | 80 |\n|----|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|\n| 1 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 2 | Q | And
asked
for
additional
information? | |\n| 3 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 4 | Q | And
additional
information
was
provided? | |\n| 5 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 6 | Q | The
board
received
it? | |\n| 7 | A | Yes. | |\n| 8 | Q | The
board
voted? | |\n| 9 | A | Yes. | |\n| 10 | Q | The
board
approved? | |\n| 11 | A | Yes. | |\n| 12 | Q | The
board
knew
there
was
a
limited
time
period | that |\n| 13 | Mr.
Kwok | was
giving
in
order
to
approve;
correct? | |\n| 14 | A | Yes. | |\n| 15 | Q | And
they
voted
to
approve
him
as
a
tenant? | |\n| 16 | A | Yes. | |\n| 17 | Q | So
they
.knewhe
had
no
U.S.
assets;
correct? | |\n| 18 | A | Yes. | |\n| 19 | QThey | knew
he
had
no
assets
in
his
own
name; | |\n| 20 | correct? | | |\n| 21 | A | Yes. | |\n| 22 | Q | And
they
approved
him
as
a
cooperative
owner? | |\n| 23 | A | Yes. | |\n| 24 | Q | They
required
a
security
deposit? | |\n| 25 | A | Yes. | |\n| | | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter. | |\n\n| | by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Harmon | 81 |\n|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|\n| Q | Mr.
Kwok
provided
the
security
deposit? | |\n| A | Yes. | |\n| Q | As
of
this
day,
how
'much
of
a
security
deposit | has |\n| been
used | to
pay
his
maintenance
charges? | |\n| A | None. | |\n| Q | So
the
person
from
whom
Mr.
Kwok
purchased | the |\n| apartment, | do
you
know
in
what
form
that
apartment
wab | held? |\n| Do
you
know | who
the
owner
was? | |\n| A | Yes. | |\n| Q | And
who
was
the
owner? | |\n| A | It
was
Gilbert
Haroche,
and
I
believe
it
was | in
an |\n| LLC. | | |\n| Q | So
the
apartment
was
purchased
from
somebody | who |\n| held
the | apartment
in
an
LLC;
correct? | |\n| A | Yes. | |\n| Q | And
Mr.
Horvitz,
in
what
capacity
does
he | own
his |\n| apartment? | Doesn't
he
own
this
apartment
through
a | I trust? |\n| A | I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that,
offhand. | |\n| Q | There
are
many
people
in
the
Sherry
who
own | their |\n| apartment | through
an
entity;
is
that
correct? | |\n| A | Yes. | |\n| Q | And
the
Sherry
knew
that
Mr.
Kwok
was
buying | the |\n| apartment | through
an
entity;
correct? | |\n| A | Yes | |\n| Q | And
they
approved
it? | |\n\n| | 82
by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Harmon |\n|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | |\n| 1 | Yes.
A |\n| 2 | Now,
you
said
that
there
came
a
time
when
Mr.
Kwok,
Q |\n| 3 | or
someone
on
his
behalf,
inquired
about
transferring
the |\n| 4 | apartment
to
his
son? |\n| 5 | A
Yes. |\n| 6 | Okay.
And
so
that
was
an
inquiry,
How
do
we
go
Q |\n| 7 | about
doing
that;
is
that
correct? |\n| 8 | Yes.
A |\n| 9 | Q
And
the
Sherry-Netherland
responded.
You
told |\n| 10 | I
Mr.
Kwok
how
he
should
go
about
doing
that,
if
he
wanted
to |\n| 11 | do
it;
correct? |\n| 12 | That's
correct.
A |\n| 13 | And
he
didn't.
Q |\n| 14 | That's
correct.
A |\n| 15 | So
nothing
ever
came
of
it?
Q |\n| 16 | That's
correct.
A |\n| 17 | And
you
said
that.
at
some
time
Mileson,
that's
Q |\n| 18 | Mr.
Kwok's
son,
wanted
to
be
the
contact
person? |\n| 19 | A
That's
correct. |\n| 20 | Who
is
the
contact
person
now?
Q |\n| 21 | The
contact
person
that
I
generally
use
is
Brenda.
A |\n| 22 | Brenda
Tsang,
I
think
is
her
last
name. |\n| ,23 | Not
Mr.
Kwok?
Q |\n| 24 | No.
A |\n| 25 | Because
Brenda
speaks
English
well;
correct?
Q
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
by
Harmon | | |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|--|\n| | | | |\n| 1 | A
Brenda
speaks
English
well,
and
I've
been | | |\n| 2 | instructed
that
that's
who
manages
the
apartment,
and | if
I | |\n| 3 | need
to
get
in
touch
with
someone,
that's
who
I
get
in | touch | |\n| 4 | with. | | |\n| 5 | And
have
you
ever
spoken
to
Mr.
Kwok's
son,
Q | | |\n| 6 | Mileson? | | |\n| 7 | Only
pleasantries.
A | | |\n| 8 | Only
pleasantries.
And
when
you
speak
to
Q | him,
how | |\n| 9 | is
his
English? | | |\n| 10 | Like
I
say,
I
haven't
spoken
to
him
at
length.
A | His | |\n| 11 | English
seemed
to
be
fine. | | |\n| 12 | He
lives
in
London;
doesn't
he?
Q | | |\n| 13 | A
It's
my
understanding. | | |\n| 14 | And
his
English
seems
to
be
fine?
Q | | |\n| 15 | A
I
would
say
he
is
fluent
in
English. | | |\n| 16 | He's
fluent.
Okay.
Q | | |\n| 17 | MR.
HARMON:
Can
I
have
a
moment,
your | Honor? | |\n| 18 | I
think
that
may
be
it. | | |\n| 19 | (Whereupon,
there
was
a
pause
in
the | | |\n| 20 | proceedings.
) | | |\n| 21 | MR.
HARMON:
One
more
thing. | | |\n| 22 | Q
One
more
thing.
Were
you
at
the
board
meeting, | the | |\n| 23 | second
board
meeting,
where
Mr.
Kwok's
purchase
apPlilation | | |\n| 24 | was
approved? | | |\n| 25 | A
I
believe
it
was
a
telephonic
board
meeting, | and
I | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | I | |\n\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
by
Harmon | B4 |\n|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| was,
yes. | was
on
the
phone
call. | |\n| Q | in
that
board
meeting,
did
Mr.
Horvitz | make
a |\n| presentation | about
someone
who
made
a
personal | I
to |\n| support
Mr. | Kwok's
application? | |\n| A | | |\n| Q | that
was
an
architect
in
Taiwan? | |\n| A | Taiwan
or
Hong
Kong.
I
don't | |\n| Q | who
was
known
to
Mr.
Horvitz? | |\n| A | I
berieve
that's
correct. | |\n| Q | that
person
vouched
for
Mr.
Kwok? | |\n| A | highly. | |\n| Q | highly.
And
among
the
other
documents | that |\n| were | in
connection
with
the
approval | there |\n| were | letters;
weren't
there? | |\n| A | there
were. | |\n| Q | one
of
the
reference
letters
was | by |\n| the
former | Minister
of
the
United
Kingdom,
Tony | Blair; |\n| \"is
that | | |\n| A | correct. | |\n| Q | you. | |\n| | MR.
HARMON:
I
have
nothing
else. | |\n| RE-DIRECT | | |\n| BY
MR. | | |\n| Q | Horvitz,
I
just
have
two
follow
up | questions. |\n| No.
A | I'm
not
Mr.
Horvitz. | |\n| | | I
And
reference
Yes.
And
Either
remember.
Somebody
Yes.
And
Very
Very
submitted
process,
reference
Yes,
And
submitted
Prime
right?
That's
Thank
EXAMINATION
SARNOFF:
Mr. |\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 86 of\n\n| | 126 |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | 85
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Re-Direct
Sarnoff
by |\n| 1 | No.
Mr.
Ullman.
Sorry.
Q |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry? |\n| 3 | MR.
SARNOFF:
I
said
Mr.
Horvitz.
My
jrror. |\n| 4 | Q
Mr.
Harmon
asked
you
questions
about
whether
other |\n| 5 | purchasers
used
an
LLC
to
buy
their
apartment.
Just
fO
be |\n| 6 | clear,
no
one
has
used
a
double
LLC,
and
no
one
has
used
a |\n| 7 | foreign
LLC.
Is
that
fair? |\n| 8 | That's
fair.
A |\n| 9 | Q
And
Mr.
Harmon
asked
you
whether
you
unders~ood |\n| 10 | that
you
would
receive,
that
the
Sherry-Netherland
WOlld |\n| 11 | receive
notice
if
Mr.
Kwok
were
to
enter
into
a
contrlct
to |\n| 12 | sell
his
apartment;
is
that
correct? |\n| 13 | A
Correct. |\n| 14 | But
if
Mr.
Kwok
transferred
the
ownership
of
the
Q |\n| 15 | foreign
LLC
that
the
ultimate
owner,
would
the |\n| 16 | Sherry-Netherland
necessarily
get
notice
of
that? |\n| 17 | We
should
get
notice
of
it.
A |\n| 18 | But
as
it's
set
up
now,
if
Mr.
Kwok
didn't
tell
Q |\n| 19 | you,
and
went
out
and
did
that,
would
you
get
notice? |\n| 20 | That
wouldn't
be
something
that
happens
through
the |\n| 21 | building;
would
it? |\n| 22 | A
Correct. |\n| 23 | THE
COURT:
I
don't
understand.
An
apartment |\n| 24 | l
in
the
Sherry-Netherland
can't
transfer
without
pproval |\n| 25 | of
the
Sherry-Netherland
board;
correct. |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22
Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18
Page 87 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 | | | |\n| | 86
by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Re-Direct
Sarnoff | | | |\n| 1 | THE
WITNESS:
That's
correct. | | | |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
So
if
the
owner
of
this
apirtment | | | |\n| 3 | sought
to
transfer
ownership
of
this
apartment,
that | | | |\n| 4 | couldn't
be
accomplished
without
the
approval
of
the | | | |\n| 5 | Sherry-Netherland. | | | |\n| 6 | THE
WITNESS:
That's
correct. | | | |\n| 7 | THE
COURT:
So
what
was
the
response
to
the | | | |\n| 8 | last
question? | | | |\n| 9 | THE
WITNESS:
I | | | |\n| 10 | May
I?
Q | | | |\n| 11 | A
Yeah.
Go. | | | |\n| 12 | Q
The
ownership
structure
is
that
the
New
York
LLC | | | |\n| 13 | that
owns
the
apartment
is
owned
by
a
B.V.I
LLC
that
lwns
the | | | |\n| 14 | New
York
apartment,
that
owns
--
and
Mr.
Kwok
is
the
lltimate | | | |\n| 15 | beneficial
owner. | | | |\n| 16 | Whatf
I
was
asking
was
whether
or
not,
if
Mr.
Kwok | | | |\n| 17 | transferred,
to
some
other
party,
ownership
of
the
B.V.I
LLC; | | | |\n| 18 | the
board
wouldn't
necessarily
know
it.
It
wouldn't
lnvolve | | | |\n| 19 | I
a
new
purchase
or
sale
agreement,
and
he
could
transfer
the | | | |\n| 20 | LLC
ownership
to
a
third
party,
away
from
himself,
an1
it | | | |\n| 21 | wouldn't
be
his
any
more,
even
though
the
SherrY-Nethirland | | | |\n| 22 | I
board
did
not
enter
into
a
new
purchase
or
sale
contract
for | | | |\n| 23 | the
apartment.
That
was
the | | | |\n\n24 25 THE COURT: I don't think that's the witness's testimony.\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n.\n\n| | 87
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Re-Direct
Sarnoff
by |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | MR.
HARMON:
It's
not. |\n| 2 | A
Go
back
and
ask
me
the
question
again. |\n| 3 | You
would
be
involved
if
the
LLC
in
New
York
were
Q |\n| 4 | to
sell
the
property;
correct? |\n| 5 | A
If
the
LLC,
which
Mr.
Kwok
controls,
sells
the |\n| 6 | apartment,
there
would
be
a
purchase-sale.
Yes. |\n| 7 | Q.
But
if
the
apartment
is
not
involved
in
a
purchase |\n| 8 | 'ore1gn
fl,er,
1S\"1
d'
f
1
b
h
or
sa
e,
ut
t
e
LLC
1nvo
ve
1n
a
trans
1t |\n| 9 | necessar1'I
'ld
'
I
wouldn't
y
come
to
your
attent1on;
wou
1t~ |\n| 10 | No.
A |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
But
it
wouldn't
be
binding.
There |\n| 12 | can
be
no
transfer
of
an
apartment. |\n| 13 | THE
WITNESS:
Well,
legally |\n| 14 | THE
COURT:
As
far
as
you
understand,
absent |\n| 15 | I
approval
of
the
board
of
directors,
no
unit
of
the |\n| 16 | Sherry-Netherland
can
be
transferred
to
anybody. |\n| 17 | THE
WITNESS:
That's
correct. |\n| 18 | MR.
HARMON:
Can
I
ask
a
few
questions
on |\n| 19 | that? |\n| 20 | THE
COURT:
I
think
I
understand
this,
really. |\n| 21 | It's
not
that
complicated.
Go
ahead.
Ask
your |\n| 22 | questions. |\n| 23 | MR.
HARMON:
Thank
you.
I
will
be
really |\n| 24 | quick |\n| 25 | Mr.
Ullman,
when
somebody
buys
an
apartment
at
the
Q |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 89 of 126\n\n88 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Re-Direct by Sarnoff** 1 Sherry-Netherland, they are issued. a stock certificate; 2 correct? 3 4 A Q Yes. And the Sherry-Netherland keeps the records of who 5 the owner of that shock certificate is? 6 7 A Q That's correct. And in order for that stock certificate to be 8 transferred to another name, to be re-registered, the 9 Sherry-Netherland has to approve that. 10 A That's correct. 11 12 13 14 Q So if somebody came in and presented *you* with a stock certificate registered in somebody -- transferr~d to somebody else, the Sherry-Netherland would reject that; wouldn't it? 15 16 A Q That's correct. And the Sherry-Netherland would not issue a 17 proprietary lease to that person; correct? 18 19 A Q That's correct. So that the Sherry-Netherland, as far as you are 20 concerned, the owner is Genever, and Genever has the 21 proprietary lease, and that's the Sherry's position; correct? 22 23 24 25 A That's correct. MR. HARMON: Thank *you.* THE COURT: Okay. Next witness. (Whereupon, the witness was excused fr0m the I . Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n89\n\nwitness stand.)\n\n1\n\n2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MR. HARMON:' Your Honor, I did ~ot wanr to speak out of turn, but I think the next w~tness ~s a presentation of a video deposition of Mr. Horvitl, and perhaps we can save some time if we could submit the transcript that plaintiffs and we have marked with our objections to various portions, and your Honor CfUld read the transcript, and we don't have to take up your time any more than -- THE COURT: No, no, no, no, no. I want to hear the whole case here and now. MR. HARMON: Okay. THE COURT: I don't want to go back ana start reading things, and objections. MR. HARMON: That's fine. 16 17 MS. SEARLES: I just had a question, clarification, because we haven't spoken about for I this 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 before. We designated and cross designated, and there were objections to certain select portions. My question to you is, did you put the cross designations, otr cross designations in that you did not object to? Is ~hiS part of this video presentation. MR. MOSS: We put all of your cross designations in. 25 MS. SEARLES: Okay. And you put all of yours I\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n## Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 91 of\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n\n> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 90 **Proceedings** in, irrespective of objections on either side? MR. MOSS: Yes. MS. SEARLES: Okay. MR. MOSS: Yes. Everything you cross designated is in here, to the extent -- we are not playing the whole thing. Your Honor, this is Michael Horvitz. Michael Horvitz, you have heard, is the Chairman and prebident Sherry-Netherland. When Mr. Kwok applied to the board to purchase the apartment he submitted financial information. Mr. Horvitz reviewed that financial information lnd he I recommended to the board that they approve the purchase based on that financial information. First I jubt want to walk through some of his testimony, because I think it will be more efficient than the video, to just show you the 18 19 I don't **THE** COURT: I just want to hear the testimony. want any demonstratives. I've got two flet of 20 21 22 23 24 25 paper from the parties about this. MR. MOSS: Fair enough. **THE** COURT: This is an evidentiary hearing, so just present the evidence. MR. MOSS: All right. Mr. Horvitz's testimony. Lisa A. Casey C Official Court Reporter\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n91\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\n1\n\n2 MS. SEARLES: I'm sorry to interrupt. I'm 3 4 having a hard time -- I thought you said designations and cross designations were that aU of the in the)e, but 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 this is not -- are you not playing it in order? MR. MOSS: No. Everything you countered designated, we have put in, to the extent we are not playing all of our designations. That would take 45 minutes. MS. SEARLES: Okay. MR. MOSS: This is a select clip, and to the extent we are playing something that you counter designated, we are playing your counters. MS. SEARLES: Okay. The only issue I'm having ~s, thatId' es~gnate d'qu~te a b't~, and' ~t's ~mposs~ , I 'ble for me to figure out what page you are playing hlre. MR. MOSS: Okay. MS. SEARLES: I mean, that is clearly started halfway through the day. MR. MOSS: Okay. I'm happy to -- the page numbers and lines are right there. I'm happy to give you -- MS. SEARLES: I can't see the page number. I can see the line numbers. That may be the issue I'm having.\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n92\n\n| 1 | |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | MR.
MOSS:
Okay.
It's
page
64,
65,
66
and
67. |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
Look,
considering
the
quality
of |\n| 3 | the
firms
involved
here,
I'm
a
little
bit
perPleLed.
If |\n| 4 | you
are
going
to
exhibit
a
deposition,
you
are
gbing
to |\n| 5 | exhibit
everything
that
you
have
designated,
and |\n| 6 | everything
that
they
have
designated,
in
sequence. |\n| 7 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes. |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
To
the
extent
that
there
a;r-e
I |\n| 9 | ['
11
objections
that
are
asserted
at
the
deposition, |\n| 10 | .1.
rule
on
whether
the
portions
that
you
are
exh~b~t~ng
can |\n| 11 | or
cannot
evidence.
come
into |\n| 12 | MR.
MOSS:
It's
not
quite
right,
your
Honor. |\n| 13 | I
We
both
designated.
It
would
take
probably
an
hour
to |\n| 14 | play
everything
that
we
have
designated.
We.
are
only |\n| 15 | playing
a
10-minute
clip
of
a
portion
of
what
we
have |\n| 16 | designated,
because
it
would
take
too
long
to
play
the |\n| 17 | entire
thing. |\n| 18 | MR.
SARNOFF:
And
everything
that
she |\n| 19 | designated. |\n| 20 | MR.
MOSS:
And
everything
-- |\n| 21 | MR.
HARMON:
Why
isn't
the
transcript
being
-- |\n| 22 | MS.
SEARLES:
My
understanding
was
that
they |\n| 23 | intended
to
offer
everything
that
they
Originallt |\n| 24 | designated. |\n| 25 | MR.
MOSS:
Our
understanding
is
that
all
of
I |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 94 of\n\n**Proceedings** 126\n\n| 1 | the
testimony
that
has
been
designated
is
in
evi~ence. |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
Look,
Mr.
Horvitz
is
up
at
the |\n| 3 | Sherry-Netherland;
right? |\n| 4 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes. |\n| 5 | THE
COURT:
You
could
have
had
him
come
here; |\n| 6 | right. |\n| 7 | MR.
MOSS:
Oh,
no.
He
lives
in
Cleveland. |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry? |\n| 9 | MR.
MOSS:
He
lives
in
Cleveland.
He
is
the |\n| 10 | president
of
the
board,
but
he
resides
and
lives
full |\n| 11 | time
in
Cleveland. |\n| 12 | THE
COURT:
Okay. |\n| 13 | MR.
MOSS:
He
is
unavailable. |\n| 14 | THE
COURT:
So
he's
an
out-of-state
witness. |\n| 15 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes. |\n| 16 | THE
COURT:
And
therefore,
are
you
playing
his |\n| 17 | deposition. |\n| 18 | MR.
MOSS:
Correct. |\n| 19 | THE
COURT:
Have
you
been
able
to
come
to
an |\n| 20 | agreement
as
to
how
you
are
going
to
exhibit
the |\n| 21 | portions
of
the
deposition
that
you
want
me
to
see? |\n| 22 | MR.
MOSS:
Well,
our
understanding
was
that
we |\n| 23 | have
designated
it,
and
your
Honor
has
the
designations, |\n| 24 | so
that
to
the
extent
there
weren't
objections,
!hat |\n| 25 | would
be
in
evidence.
We
were
only
going
to
Pla~
a
I |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 95 of 126\n\n**Proceedings**\n\n94\n\n| 1 | selection
of
that
today,
because
playing
the
entire |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | thing
would,
again,
take
an
hour. |\n| 3 | THE
COURT:
I'm
only
going
to
consider
what
I |\n| 4 | see
in
this
court. |\n| 5 | MR.
MOSS:
Okay. |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
Those
are
my
rules.
So
go
ahead. |\n| 7 | MS.
SEARLES:
Just
so
that
I
do
not
get
up
and |\n| 8 | interrupt
again,
I
want
to
make
it
clear,
we
havl |\n| 9 | multiple
relevance
objections
to
some
of
this
tebtimOny |\n| 10 | that's
coming
in.
Do
you
want
me
to
-- |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
Well,
if
they
weren't
asserted
at |\n| 12 | the
deposition
-- |\n| 13 | MS.
SEARLES:
Relevance
is
not
a
deposition |\n| 14 | objection,
so
-- |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Just
proceed. |\n| 16 | (Video
tape
played.
) |\n| 17 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 18 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry? |\n| 19 | MR.
HARMON:
I
object.
He
is
summarizing
more |\n| 20 | testimony
that's
not
before
you. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
Overruled. |\n| 22 | (Video
tape
played.
) |\n| 23 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 24 | Relevance. |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
That's
overruled, |\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n95\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\nMR. HARMON: Your Honor, excuse me. Your Honor, in doing this, they have X-ed out Objectibns to form that were made during the course of this teltimOny, so that you don't see them and you don't hear thlem. THE COURT: L00,k I may be m~ss~ng \" somiI th'~ng. I just heard the last witness testify that the apartment is owned by Genever and that it can't be transfelred to anybody other than Genever without the approval bf the h h k d f ' I I, board, so w et er Mr. Kwo rnae up a a~ry ta e ~n some h h k' k' l'bl other context, or w et er Mr. Kwo ~s ta ~ng ~ ert~es . with the truth isn't really relevant to who owns this apartment.\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\nMR. MOSS: Our next witness is Mr. -- THE COURT: Do you have cross designations for\n\n17 this deposition?\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n18 19 20 21 MS. SEARLES: Yes. I just wanted to make two quick points. First of all, the objections that I made during the deposition were excised from the video, so there were, at least, a couple of objections.\n\n22 23 THE COURT: Okay. I would have overruled them all any way.\n\n24 25 MS. SEARLES: And that's fine. I just wanted to make that point for the record.\n\n96\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n| 1 | The
other
part
was,
he
indicated
that
it
was |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | designations
and
cross
designations.
As
you
notlced, |\n| 3 | there
were
no
cross
designations
in
there
becaus~
the |\n| 4 | sections
of
the
testimony
that
he
used
don't
inc~ude
the |\n| 5 | ones
where
we
have
cross
designations,
so
all
of
our |\n| 6 | cross
designations
occurred
at
different
parts
of
this, |\n| 7 | but
he
is
an
unavailable
witness,
so
I
don't
thihk
they |\n| 8 | are
cross
decisions
in
the
normal
sense
for |\n| 9 | completeness.
We
just
designated
our
own
sections. |\n| 10 | THE
COURT:
He
probably
has
the
abilit~
to |\n| 11 | exhibit
anything
you
want
from
the
deposition,
t~ |\n| 12 | --
present
as |\n| 13 | -
-
MS.
SEARLES:
And
I
apologize |\n| 14 | MR.
MOSS:
And
we
offered
that. |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
as
cross
examination. |\n| 16 | MR.
MOSS:
We
offered
that
in
advance. |\n| 17 | MS.
SEARLES:
No.
I
apologize,
because
when |\n| 18 | you
indicated
that
it
was
going
to
be
-- |\n| 19 | THE
COURT:
Let's
not
squabble
about
who
said |\n| 20 | I
what
to
whom.
If
you
want
to
play
any
portion
of
this |\n| 21 | I
deposition,
you
are
entitled
to
do
so,
and
he
will |\n| 22 | graciously
accommodate
you
by
playing
whatever
pbrtions |\n| 23 | of
the
deposition
you
want
played,
if
any. |\n| 24 | MS.
SEARLES:
Okay.
Give
me
just
one
second, |\n| 25 | Imake
your
Honor,
because
some
of
this
isn't
going
to
as
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 97 **Proceedings** much sense without the actual portion that the plaintiffs.have designated. You have, in front of you, you have thj -- THE COURT: I'm not reading anything that isn't presented to me. MS. SEARLES: And that's fine. We'll dust let it be. Thank you. THE COURT: Okay. Next witness. MR. MOSS: We'll call Mr. Kwok. THE COURT: Do we have an interpreter for **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 98 of 126\n\n> 11 Mr. Kwok?\n\n12 13 THE CLERK: Official Court Interpreter, please note your appearance.\n\n14 15 16 THE INTERPRETER: Mandarin Chinese Interpreter, first name Tor, T-O-R, last name Huang, H-U-A-N-G.\n\n17 18 (Whereupon, the Official Court Mandarin Interpreter was duly sworn by the clerk.)\n\n19 20 21 K WOK HOW A N, having been duly sworn by the clerk, was examined and testified as follows, with the assis~ance of. the .Official Court Mandarin Interpreter.\n\n22 23 24 25 THE CLERK: Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth in all the matters before the Court? THE WITNESS: As well, I say, it's true. THE CLERK: Please state your name and\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 99 of 126\n\n| | Proceedings |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | address. |\n| 2 | THE
WITNESS:
Kwok
Ho
Wan
K-W-O-K
H-O
,
'I
' |\n| 3 | W-A-N.
That's
my
name,
and
I
live
at
781
Fifth
Avenue. |\n| 4 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
Have
a
seat. |\n| 5 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
I
don't
want
to
waste |\n| 6 | a
lot
of
time.
The
reason
that
we
are
having
thls |\n| 7 | hearing
is
for
you
to
satisfy
your
burden
for
an
order |\n| 8 | of
attachment,
one
element
of
which
is
that
the |\n| 9 | defendant,
with
intent
to
defraud
his
creditors,
to |\n| 10 | frustrate
the
enforcement
of
a
judgment
that
might
be |\n| 11 | rendered
in
plaintiff's
favor,
has
assigned, |\n| 12 | dispossessed,
encumbered
or
secreted
property,
or |\n| 13 | removed
it
from
the
state,
or
is
about
to
do
any
of |\n| 14 | these
acts.
So
if
it's
the
case
that
this
apartment
at |\n| 15 | I
the
Sherry-Netherland
can
never
be
transferred
without |\n| 16 | the
consent
of
the
Sherry-Netherland,
and
the |\n| 17 | Sherry-Netherland
is
on
notice
that
if
there's
any |\n| 18 | attempt
to
sell
it,
you
have
to
be
provided
advahce |\n| 19 | notice,
and
they
can't
transfer
without
Court
apbroval, |\n| 20 | I
don't
think
we
need
a
lengthy
examination
of
Ml.
Kwok. |\n| 21 | I
MR.
MOSS:
Well,
your
Honor,
given
that
-- |\n| 22 | that's
new
information
that
we
heard
for
the
firlt
time. |\n| 23 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry. |\n| 24 | MR.
MOSS: |\n| 25 | the
first
time
today, |\n\nLisa A. Casey -\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n-- -------------------\n\n| 1 | status.
Maybe
it
makes
sense
to
take
our
lunch
break |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | earlier,
for
me
try
to
move
through,
edit
my
outline, |\n| 3 | and
try
to
do
a
lot
less
with
Mr.
Kwok
than
I
wal |\n| 4 | I
originally
intending
to
do,
given
that
that's
YOir
view. |\n| 5 | I'm
happy
to
start
now,
but
I
think
I
can
condense
it |\n| 6 | significantly. |\n| 7 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
You
want
to
take
a |\n| 8 | I
lunch
break
now'?
Is
that
what
you're
telling
me'? |\n| 9 | MR.
MOSS:
I
think
that
would
probably
be
less |\n| 10 | of
a
waste
of
time
for
everybody. |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Because
I'm
not |\n| 12 | ,
d
1n'
wast1ng,
'd
c1,11ent's
1ntereste
you
your
t1me
an
your |\n| 13 | money,
and
I'm
not
interested
in
you
wasting
my
lime. |\n| 14 | MR.
MOSS:
Of
course. |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
I'll
see
you
back
here
at
two |\n| 16 | o'clock.
Is
that
acceptable'? |\n| 17 | MR.
MOSS:
Sure.
fine,
That's
your
Honor. |\n| 18 | I
THE
COURT:
Is
that
acceptable
with
you,
Paul'? |\n| 19 | THE
CLERK:
Yes.
Thank
you. |\n| 20 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
Is
that
acceptable
to
the |\n| 21 | court
reporter'? |\n| 22 | THE
COURT
REPORTER:
That's
fine.
Thank
you. |\n| 23 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
tb
2:00
We
are
adjourned |\n| 24 | p.m. |\n| 25 | (Whereupon,
a
recess
was
taken.) |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | t
100
Proceedings |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | *
*
*
*
*
* |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
right.
In
this
action,
do
the
All |\n| 3 | plaintiffs
propose
to
proceed
on
the
guarantee
that's |\n| 4 | the
subject
of
this
action? |\n| 5 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes,
your
Honor. |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
And
what
is
the
position
oiE
the |\n| 7 | plaintiffs
with
respect
to
the
piercing
of
the
cbrporate |\n| 8 | veil
issues? |\n| 9 | MR.
MOSS:
Well,
as
your
Honor
has
requested, |\n| 10 | we
have
amended
our
complaint
to
add
the
Genever |\n| 11 | entities. |\n| 12 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry? |\n| 13 | MR.
MOSS:
We
have
amended
our
complaint
to |\n| 14 |
d
h
1
add
the
two
Genever
ent~t~es,
an
our
pos~t~on
~s
t
at |\n| 15 | we
pleaded
facts
in
the
amended
complaint
SUfficlent
to |\n| 16 | make
the
claim
for
veil
piercing. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
right.
But
you
are
not
All |\n| 18 | propos~ng.
bl'~sh
ve~.I
\"
th'~s
hi.ear~ng.
to
esta
p~erc~ng
at |\n| 19 | 1
MR.
MOSS:
Yes,
we
are,
your
Honor.
We
are |\n| 20 | proposing
to
do
both.
We
have
amended
the
compllint
as |\n| 21 | you've
suggested,
and
as
I
laid
out
in
the
openibg,
veil |\n| 22 | piercing
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
intend
to
~rove |\n| 23 | today. |\n| 24 | MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor
-- |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
With
respect
to
the
defendant,
is
I |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 102 of 126\n\n101 **Proceedings** 1 2 3 4 5 it the defendant's position that Mr. Kwok residence in the Sherry-Netherland on the and accurate information? MR. HARMON: Submitted to the Sherry-Netherland? purchased the basis bf true 6 7 8 9 THE COURT: I'm sorry. MR. HARMON: Are you asking whether position is that the information submitted to Sherry-Netherland was true and accurate? 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 THE COURT: MR. HARMON: THE COURT: Mr. Kwok's deposition MR. HARMON: THE COURT: MR. HARMON: Yes. Yes. Therefore, you also claim that testimony was true and acclrate? Yes, your Honor. At the time that it was given. Yes, your Honor. 17 18 THE COURT: And inadvertently pledged the you also contend that Mr. Kwok residence to another ehtity 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 after this litigation was initiated, and when he realized that he. was not entitled to transfer, pledge, I the residence, he arranged for the pledge to be removed. I MR. HARMON: I don't think I can answer your question the way you asked it. The pledge has blen removed. I don't think I'm in a position to ansLer the rest of your question, but I do want to be clearl your\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\nI\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nof 126\n\n102\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Honor, that plaintiffs have just recently amendea their complaint. The issue has not been joined on the amended complaint. We have not yet begun to conduct discovery on the merits of the claim. Everything has been directed to the question of the attachment, and so I'm I assuming, and I raised this at the last oral argument, I that once this issue was to be set aside as to whether I or not there will be an attachment, or whether the current order of the Court provides more than adkquate protection to the plaintiff, whether or not they have met the attachment standards, that we will get on and start conducting discovery on the merits, and thlt what we have been doing so far is litigating whether ~r not plaintiffs have established entitlement to attachment, but nothing more than that. No ultimate findingb of fact or conclusions on the merits of the case, bkcause we are only dealing with the attachment issue at this tiine.\n\n19 20 THE COURT: veil piercing, won't Well, if the plaintiff establishes that have some impact on whlt 21 orders the Court should consider issuing?\n\n22 23 24 MR. HARMON: So the short answer is of course, but the longer answer is that I don't think the Court has to reach a final determination of whether or not the 25 plaintiffs have established veil piercing in order I to\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n| 1 | decide
.whether
or
not
the
attachment
is
appropriate
or |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | not.
The
standards
for
determining
proof
at
thil
stage |\n| 3 | are
not
the
same
as
the
standards
for
ultimate |\n| 4 | determination,
and
so
I
would
say
that
whatever
rUling |\n| 5 | you
make
regarding
the
questions
now
before
you
would |\n| 6 | not
represent
final
rulings
on
the
merits
of
the
case, |\n| 7 | which
still
is
yet
to
come,
following
our
completion
of |\n| 8 | discovery. |\n| 9 | So
to
be
clear,
your
Honor,
because
of
the
way |\n| 10 | that
your
Honor
phrased
the
reasons
for
conducting
an |\n| 11 | evidentiary
hearing,
it
was
not
our
intention
to
go
into |\n| 12 | detail
in
depth
about
the
veil
piercing
issue.
[ |\n| 13 | understand
that
you
could
grant
the
attachment
wlthout |\n| 14 | making
a
final
determination,
but
we
were
not
hele
today |\n| 15 | prepared
to
put
on
all
of
the
evidence
regarding
veil |\n| 16 | piercing. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Do
we
have
any |\n\nTHE COURT: All right. Do we have any estimated time of arrival of the interpreter?\n\n18\n\n25\n\n19 20 21 22 THE CLERK: No. Just that one was ordered at about 1:00 in the afternoon, and they are coming from the Bronx. They were ordered, I got the email, at 12:51 p.m.\n\n23 24 THE COURT: Okay. So we shouldn't have to wait too much longer.\n\n> Let me ask the plaintiff, as a practical . I\n\n| | Proceedings | 104 |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|\n| 1 | matter
-- | |\n| 2 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes,
your
Honor. | |\n| 3 | THE
COURT:
--
how
are
you
better
off | if
an |\n| 4 | attachment
is
issued,
which
is
purely
discretionary? | |\n| 5 | MR.
MOSS:
Better
off
than
with
the | nOfice |\n| 6 | order
in
place?
Your
Honor,
better
off
between | fhe |\n| 7 | attachment
or
the
notice
order?
Is
that
the | question? |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
Yes. | |\n| 9 | MR.
MOSS:
I
think
that
the
main
problem, | or |\n| 10 | one
of
the
main
problems,
with
the
notice
order | ks
that |\n| 11 | under
the
notice
order,
Mr.
Kwok
--
I
have
it
ribht | |\n| 12 | here
has
to
provide
us
with
immediate
written | notice |\n| 13 | once
he
already
has
a
contract
for
sale,
or | assignment |\n| 14 | of
the
residence.
So
at
that
point,
he
has
alrekdY | |\n| 15 | agreed
to
sell
it
to
somebody.
They
may
have
a | flaim |\n| 16 | against
the
apartment,
even
if
the
Sherry-Netheriand | |\n| 17 | doesn't
approve
it. | |\n| 18 | Second,
it
doesn't
apply
to
transfers | if |\n| 19 | Genever,
and
I
know
the
Court
--
and
I
understana, | as
a |\n| 20 | practical
matter,
if
Genever
--
that
there
are | tLo |\n| 21 | Genever
entities
on
top
of
the
apartment.
If
oni | of |\n| 22 | those,
or
both
of
those,
are
transferred,
then | tLiS |\n| 23 | order
doesn't
apply
to
that.
The
Sherry-Netherland | I |\n| 24 | wouldn't
know
about
that.
In
fact,
the
apartment | I
the |\n\nLisa A. ~asey - Official Court Reporter\n\nI\n\nGenever entities, their assets, which include thi\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n| 1 | apartment,
have
been
pledged
during
this
case,
and |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | nobody
knew
about
it.
So
if
.the
order
were
broarened
to |\n| 3 | include
transfers
of
the
Genever
entities,
PledgjS, |\n| 4 | assignments,
sales,
and
done.
so
before
the
transfer, |\n| 5 | that
would
take
care
of
one
of
the
problems. |\n| 6 | The
other
problem
is
the
Zhang
Wei
testimony. |\n| 7 | The
testimony
is
that
Mr.
Kwok
has
said
he
doesn't
own |\n| 8 | the
apartment,
somebody
else
does,
Zhang
Zhjng
Wei,
Wei |\n| 9 | is
the
one
who
pledged
it,
and
Zhang
Wei
can
apparently |\n| 10 | do
whatever
he
wants
with
the
apartment.
So
the
concern |\n| 11 | is
that |\n| 12 | THE
COURT:
No,
no,
no.
The
legal
owner
of |\n| 13 | I
I
the
apartment
is
the
Genever
LLC,
which,
as
understand |\n| 14 | I
it,
is
a
sole
member
LLC
owned
by
Mr.
Kwok;
correct? |\n| 15 | MR.
MOSS:
Well,
it's
a
little
-- |\n| 16 | THE
COURT:
And
then
the
Genever
entity
is,
in |\n| 17 | turn,
owned
by
another
Genever
LLC. |\n| 18 | MR.
MOSS:
And
Mr.
Kwok
owns
that
one. |\n| 19 | THE
COURT:
And
Mr.
Kwok
is
the
sole
member
of |\n| 20 | that
one. |\n| 21 | MR.
MOSS:
Correct,
your
Honor. |\n| 22 | THE
COURT:
So
the
only
entity
that
can |\n| 23 | transfer
ownership
of
the
apartment
is
the
Genevlr |\n| 24 | entity
that
holds
title;
correct? |\n| 25 | MR.
MOSS:
That
should
be
the
case. |\n| | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 107 of 126\n\n# **Proceedings** Honor.\n\n106\n\n1\n\n2 3 title to THE COURT: , And the Genever entity that owns the apartment can only transfer it witd the 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 approval of the board of directors of the Sherry-Netherland; correct. MR~ MOSS: Well, the Genever entity, the New York'entity that owns the apartment, is controlled by the British Virgin Islands entity. THE' COURT: I get all of that. But tHe title to the apartment is in the Genever entity. MR. MOSS: Yes. THE COURT: That is in New York, and is listed on the records of the Sherry-Netherland as the owner of the apartment. MR. MOSS: Correct, your Honor. THE COURT: And that entity can't sell the apartment without giving notice; correct? MR. MOSS: Well, the current order is ihat - the defendant which, at the time that this was entered, we hadn't amended, so it was Mr. Kwok must provife -- THE COURT: Okay. So at a minimum, I have to amend the prior order precluding Mr. Kwok, Genevlr New York, and Genever B.V.I. from transferring, assi6ning or pledging the apartment without giving you notice, and the Court will so order that, and we'll prepare an order\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\nI\n\n---\\_.\\_--------\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\nof 126\n\nto that effect.\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n20\n\nNow, assuming that order is entered before the sun goes down today, why do you need an attachment, assuming all of the following: Mr. Kwok denies rhe existence of the debt owed to the plaintiff -- and this is assuming, without deciding any of these thingls.\n\nMR. MOSS: Of course, your Honor.\n\n8 9 THE the residence COURT: Assuming that Mr. Kwok purchased under false pretenses; assuming thlt some 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 mysterious Chinese political prisoner, Zhang Wei, W-E-I, controls Genever; assuming, without deciding, that Mr. Kwok lied about a potential pledge of the relidence to another entity after this litigation was initlated; assuming, without deciding, that Mr. Kwok lied ar his deposition, that he never attempted to assign the residence to his son; and assuming, without deCibing, that Mr. Kwok was improperly directed by counsel not to answer questions regarding.his intent to sell the residence.\n\nHow are you prejudiced?\n\n21 22 23 24 25 MR. MOSS: Other than -- I don't t~ink we are, your Honor. Obviously, we would prefer the attachment. It's a property interest. We think that we have met, and can meet, the burden, but if that's how your Honor wishes to proceed, you know, I don't have --\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n1 2 3 4 THE COURT: I haven't decided facts, but I am going to issue an order I just indicated, and does that obviate to proceed to any of those along tJe lines the need for us 5 6 MR. SARNOFF: May I question? Would we therefore also just ask one related assume that the motion is 7 8 sort of suspended, and we can renew it at such time as any of those -- 9 10 THE COURT: Well, prejudice to you seeking an of course this is wiihout attachment if and when you 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 get notice of any intent by any of the three persons or entities that I've just identified to sell, pledge, assign or otherwise transfer the residence. MR. SARNOFF: I think under those conditions, your Honor, we would be amenable to such an orde~ and to the suspension or withdrawal, at this point, of bur attachment m9tion. THE COURT: Okay. Now, do defendants have a problem with any of this? 20 21 MR. HARMON: solved the problem, I If I thought that that would have will have suggested it a lbng time 22 23 24 25 ago, so the answer is no, I have no problem with it. I do want to be clear, however, that the without prejudice to renew the attachment is not just whenever the~ feel like it, or whenever they think they have more e~idence,\n\n109\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nof 126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\nbut when they are given notice that a potential transfer may be taking place, so that we don't\n\nTHE COURT: I don't going to reveal in this case, complaint know what discover¥ is based on the amendLd\n\nMR. HARMON: But your Honor --\n\nTHE COURT: -- and I don't believe thai the plaintiffs poc~ets are deep enough to come running back here seeking an attachment unless they have some greater basis for doing so than they presently have.\n\n11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. HARMON: I think you would be surprised, and I said this at the last oral argument, I didh,t know why they made the second application, given the lelief that your Honor had fashioned for them in the filst I application, which was relief they hadn't even asked for. So I didn't understand the need for the se~ond application, and if somebody had said to us, Weli, let's include the entities, we would have said fine. kt's an I injunction. We'll abide by the injunction. So that's why I'm saying, I just want to be clear that we lre I going to move from here to merits discovery, so we can get on with trying to deal with the issues that lre the heart of the case and not just whether or not thiy will I be able to 'collect against the Sherry apartment if and when they ever get a judgment.\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n,\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 111 of 126\n\n> 1 110 THE COURT: But they don't have a judgment. 2 3 4 5 MR. HARMON: Exactly. THE COURT: All right. To simpler, and to avoid an application the order that' I'm going to enter is make this eren for any attachment, going to aliso 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 require the defendants to give notice if Genever New York or Genever B.V.I. wishes to sell or transfe~ any of its assets. So B.V.I. can't sell --'I'm sorry benever , I B.V.I. can't sell Genever New York to another LLC without giving notice. MR. HARMON: That's fine. MR. SARNOFF: And cannot pledge it, either. And also cannot pledge it. THE COURT: Yes. Right? So are we done? MR. MOSS: I think we are. MR. SARNOFF: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. MR. MOSS: Thank you. THE COURT: Okay. Have a nice afternoon and a nice weekend. MR. MOSS: You too. Thank you. 21 \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* 22 23 24 25 Certified to be a true and accurate e above-entitled m tter.\n\nSenior Court Reporter Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n| Pacific Alliance
Asia v.
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Kwok HoWan | | | | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|\n| | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | I |\n| | address
(10) | 58:18;67:14 | 18,22;39:2,11,14,19; | April (2) |\n| \\$ | 17:4,6;20:3,6,7,8, | agreed
(3) | 40: 18;41 :21 ;43:5,7; | I 49:7;51:
14 |\n| | 12;56: 10;70: 10;98: I | 12: 14;21 :6; I04: 15 | 44:4,6,7;46:3;55:4, | architect
(I) |\n| | addresses
(I) | agreement
(12) | 18;56: 12;57: 17; | I 84:6 |\n| \\$3.3 (2) | 16:8 | 7:11;11:11;45:16; | 58: 12;59:7;61
:7,10; | argue
(I) |\n| 61:21;63:24 | adequate
(3) | | | |\n| \\$60 (3) | | 61 :23;67: 17,25;68:2, | 64:6,11,15;65:15; | 71-13 I
-
I |\n| 21 :2;22:4,23 | 62: 18,20; 102:9 | 7,18;70: 19;86: 19; | 66: 1;67:3, 15;68:8,14, | argued
(2) |\n| | adjourned
(I) | 93:20 | 21,21 ;69:2;70:6,12, | I
16:21;45:12 |\n| A | 99:23 | agreements
(I) | 13,17,18;74:
15,19; | argument
(6) |\n| | administrative
(I) | 67:16 | 75:25;76:
13;79:21; | I 24:21;44:2,16; |\n| abandon
(2) | 67:4
- | ahead
(7) | 81:7,7,13,14,17,17, | :
45:21;102:6;109:12 |\n| 49:21;51:3 | administrator
(5) | 29: 15;34:7;62:
12; | 20,23;82:4;83:2; | arguments
(2) |\n| abide (I) | 27:3,4;39:7;42:6; | 63: 14;66: 17;87:21; | 85:5,12,23;86:2,3,13, | I 32:14,16 |\n| 109:19 | 47:1 | 94:6 | 14,23;87:6,7,12,25; | around
(4) |\n| | admissible
(I) | akin (I) | 90: 11 ;95:7,13;98:
14; | 20:23;48:25;55:
19; |\n| ability
(I) | 26:20 | 56:25 | 104: 16,21,24;
105: I, | |\n| 96:10 | admitted
(3) | | | 70:25
I |\n| able (5) | | Alliance
(I) | 8,10,13,23;
106:3,7, | arranged
(I) |\n| 31: 19;49:8;72:23; | 12:22;24:
10;41: 17 | 2:2 | 10,14,17,24;
109:24 | I 101:21 |\n| 93:19;109:24 | admonitions
(I) | allow (3) | apartment's
(2) | arrested
(I) |\n| absent
(I) | 13:19 | 8:20;66: 17;75: 13 | 30: 14;98:25 | I 48:17 |\n| 87:14 | adult
(I) | almost
(3) | apologize
(3) | arrival
(I) |\n| absolutely
(4) | 50:24 | 20:11;47:3;52:23 | 41:9;96:13,17 | I
103: 18 |\n| 5:20;73:7,11;76:10 | advance
(3) | along (3) | apparently
(I) | Asia (I) |\n| abuse
(2) | 73:20;96:
16;98: 18 | 34:6;56:
17; 108:2 | 105:9 | I 2:2 |\n| | adverse
(I) | amassing
(I) | appear
(2) | aside (I) |\n| 4:16;14:21 | 54:6 | | | |\n| accede (I) | | 79:10 | 14:8;50: 13 | I 102:7 |\n| 64:2 | adversely
(I) | amazing
(I) | appearance
(I) | asserted
(2) |\n| accept (2) | 9:8 | 58:15 | 97:13 | I 92:9;94:
II |\n| 14:6;79:21 | advise
(I) | amenable
(I) | appearances
(2) | asset (2) |\n| acceptable
(3) | 76:7 | 108:15 | 2:4,11 | I 7:2;24: 17 |\n| 99: 16,18,20 | advising
(I) | amend
(I) | application
(13) | assets (16) |\n| access (I) | 72:4 | 106:22 | 7:22;57:
12;59: 13; | I 6:8,9,20;
II :25; |\n| | affidavit
(41) | amended
(8) | 60:2,24;62:22;65:
13, | , 37:3;60:10,14,17,18; |\n| 20:9 | 5: 17;23:2,12,18; | 100: 10,13,15,20; | | |\n| accommodate
(I) | | | 23;83:23;84:4; | 61:13;62:19;74:3,3; |\n| 96:22 | 25:8,9,12,14;26:20, | 102: 1,2; 106:20; | 109:13,15,17 | 80: 17,19; 104:25
I |\n| accomplish
(2) | 23,25;27:
1,17;28:24; | 109:4 | applications
(2) | assign (3) |\n| 67:11;74:19 | 31: 10;35:7,23,25; | America
(2) | 58:12;63:10 | I 6:25;107:15; |\n| accomplished
(2) | 36:2,3,6,8;40:11,16; | 49:4;51:
14 | applied
(2) | 108: 13
I |\n| 32: 19;86:4 | 41: 15, 15,23;42: 1,2; | American
(2) | 59:6;90:10 | ~ssigned
(I) |\n| accurate
(3) | 44: 12, 16;46: 10, 12, | 14: 15;47:5 | apply
(2) | I 98:11 |\n| 101:3,9,13 | 21 ;53:7,9,15,25; | Americans
(I) | 104: 18,23 | assigning
(I) |\n| | 54: 10,20;73: I | 15:12 | approach
(I) | |\n| across (I) | affidavits
(I) | among
(2) | | I 106:23 |\n| 6:19 | 42:4 | | 17: 12 | ~ssignment
(I) |\n| acting (2) | | 52:4;84: 12 | approached
(I) | I 104: 13 |\n| 3:25;64: 10 | affirm
(I) | amount
(4) | 64:15 | assignments
(I) |\n| action (4) | 97:22 | 3:20;61: 19;62: 17; | appropriate
(2) | I 105:4 |\n| 3:19;68:11;100:2,4 | afternoon
(3) | 79:9 | 45:12;103:1 | assistance
(I) |\n| actions
(I) | 75:3,4;103:20 | and/or (I) | approval
(II) | I 97:20 |\n| 68:10 | afterwards
(2) | 46:1 | 6:7;7:23;58:14; | ~ssistant
(2) |\n| acts (I) | 27:23;59:20 | answered
(3) | 65: 17;84: 13;85:24; | I 5: 14;77:25 |\n| | Again (IS) | 10:8;66:6,10 | 86:4;87:
15;95:9; | associates
(I) |\n| 98:14 | 4:21 ;26:8;37:6; | anymore
(I) | 98: 19; I06:4 | |\n| actual
(2) | 41 :9,25;43:4;45:20; | | | I 11:24 |\n| 44:9;97:
1 | | 43:8 | approve
(6) | assume
(I) |\n| actually
(9) | 47: I ;51: 1,1, I ;67: 13; | apartment
(129) | 7:21;80:13,15; | I 108:6 |\n| 3:8;8: 12;23:25; | 87:2;94:2,8 | 4:2;5:23;6:2,12,25; | 88:9;90:
13; 104: 17 | assuming
(9) |\n| 41: I0,23;43:8;54:17; | against
(2) | 7:9,13;8:21;
10:20; | approved
(5) | 102:6;
I07:2,4,6,8, |\n| 62:5,14 | 104:16;109:24 | 14:2,3,11,12;15:3; | 61:3;80:10,22; | 9,11,14,16 |\n| add (2) | ago (7) | 18:25;19:4,17;20:20, | 81 :25;83:24 | 1
asylum
(I) |\n| | 7: 19;42:3;55:20; | 24;23:8;27:11,18,22; | approving
(I) | |\n| 100:10,14 | 61: 12;70: 16;75: 10; | 28:7,15,17,18,19,23; | | 114:17 |\n| addition
(I) | 108:22 | | 58:12 | ~ttach
(2) |\n| | | 29:4,6,9,17;30:7,17; | approximately
(4) | I 23:8;24:21 |\n| 4:12 | | | | |\n| additional
(2)
80:2,4 | agree (5)
9:21; 14:5;49:21; | 32:21 ;33:2,9,10,
12,
13,21 ;34: 19;37: 16, | 61 :21 ;63:21 ;64: 1;
78:23 | attached
(3)
I 6:23;40:
15;41: 15 |\n\nMin-U-Scl'ipt@\n\n(I) \\$3.3 - attached\n\n| | | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 113
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | attachment
(34) | 54:11,18,22;90:14; | board's
(I) | buys (I) | I 8:24;75: II |\n| | 2:25;3: 17,22,23; | 109:4 | 65:19 | 87:25 | certificate
(4) |\n| | 4:24;5: 15,18;8: 18; | basic (I) | book (6) | BVI (8) | I 88:1,5,7,12 |\n| | 9:2;10:14;11:21; | 10:II | 12:19;41:13,14; | 34: 16, 17,23;45:9, | chairman
(2) |\n| | 13:21;24:6;25: 15; | basically
(2) | 69: 12;77:3,5 | 12;86: 13, 17;106:23 | I 58:10;90:8 |\n| | 44: 18;46: 15;78:3,5; | 31:18;59: 17 | both (6) | | chairperson
(I) |\n| | 98:8; 102:5,8, 11,14, | basis (2) | 10:22;22: 13;60: 17; | C | I 57:24 |\n| | 17;I03: 1,13;104:4,7;
107:3,22; 108: 10,17, | 101:2;109:10
began
(I) | 92: 13;100:20; I04:22
bottom
(I)
, | | challenge
(2) |\n| | 24;109:9 | 63:3 | 20:17 | call (4)
16:22;66: 19;84: I; | I 13:13;14:21
change
(3) |\n| | attempt
(I) | beginning
(I) | bought
(I) | 97:9 | I 51: 10;66:20;67:7 |\n| | 98:18 | 51:22 | 14:II | came (11) | changing
(I) |\n| | attempted
(I) | begun (I) | boyfriend
(2) | 33:2;48:7,8;49:8, | I 62:21 |\n| | 107:15 | 102:3 | 50:1,4 | 25;51: 14,21 ;52:22; | charge
(2) |\n| | attempts
(I) | behalf
(7) | breached
(I) | 82:2,15;88:11 | I 40:22,25 |\n| | 4:2 | 19:3,16;23:4,5; | 7:10 | camera
(I) | charges
(2) |\n| | attend
(I) | 64: 10;79: 12;82:3 | break
(2) | 50:22 | I 61:18;81:4 |\n| | 27:25 | behavior
(2) | 99:1,8 | can (57) | chase (I) |\n| | attention
(8) | 9:12;74:13 | Brenda
(4) | 9:16,20;12:25; | I 6:19 |\n| | 20: 16;26:6;28:24; | behind
(I) | 82:21,22,25;83:
I | 14:10;15:11,13,13; | Chief(3) |\n| | 40: 14,21;69:8, 17; | 56:17 | brief (5) | 24: 13, 15;25:4,7, I0; | I 56:23;76:5;78:9 |\n| | 87:9 | Beijing
(4) | 5:8;69: 14,18;70:5; | 26:6,9,16,18;27:2,15, | China
(11) |\n| | attorney
(7) | 33: 10,12;48:7,8 | 72:25 | 16;28: 17,20;31 :5; | 14:17, 19,24; 15:9; |\n| | 27: I;28:9;33: 19; | beneficial
(I) | briefed
(I) | 34:4,5;40: 10;42:23; | 48:25;49:2,2,9,10; |\n| | 42:9;46: I;58:8;64:25
audio (3) | 86:15 | 3: I | 43: 17;46:7, 18;47:25; | 50:13,15 |\n| | 11:22,22; 12:5 | best (I)
9:12 | briefing
(I)
4:10 | 52:23;59:3;61 :2;
64: 15;66: 12;69:8; | Chinese
(17) |\n| | authentic
(2) | betray
(2) | brieny
(5) | 72: 17,19;73:25;74:2; | 14:18,20;20:9;
30:25;35: I0;42: 15; |\n| | 12:4,21 | 49:20,20 | 5:11;7:17;11:4; | 77:23;83: 17;87: 12, | 47:2;48: 18;49: 16; |\n| | authenticate
(I) | better
(7) | 16:15;74:1 | 16,18;89:5;91 :24; | 50:6,14,20,25;59:23; |\n| | 69:20 | 48:2;75: 11,12,16; | briefs (2) | 92: 10;98: 15;99:5; | 75:20;97: 14; 107: 10 |\n| | authenticity
(3) | 104:3,5,6 | II :5,6 | 101:22; 105:9,22; | choice (I) |\n| | 12:6; 13:13;43:20 | big (I) | bring (3) | 106:3; 107:24; 108:7; | I 47:2 |\n| | available
(I) | 7:10 | 15:21;58:17,18 | 109:21 | Citizen
(I) |\n| | 8:3 | bigger
(I) | British
(I) | cancel
(I) | I 14:15 |\n| | Avenue (I) | 50:24 | 106:8 | 63:5 | City (2) |\n| | 98:3 | biggest (I) | broadened
(I) | capacity
(2) | I 51:12;59:1 |\n| | avoid (4) | 6:16 | 105:2 | 78:8;81:16 | claim (4) |\n| | 5:15;11:15;44:13; | bills (2) | broker
(3) | caption
(I) | 1100:16;101:12; |\n| | 46:15 | 52:17,21 | 19:1;58: 16;64: 14 | 11:23 | 102:4;104:15 |\n| | aware
(I) | binders
(I) | Bronx (I) | care (2) | clarification
(3) |\n| | 75:22 | 43:21 | 103:21 | 13:18;105:5 | I 19:13;32: 10;89: 17 |\n| | away (2)
42:24;86:20 | binding
(I)
87:11 | brother
(5)
48~14,17;50: 10, 12, | case (22) | clear (18) |\n| | ax (I) | bit (6) | 19 | 4:1;9:2;10:8;
12:II; 16:II ;23:2,20; | 5:4;9:18;12:15;
17:3;22:3;24:4; |\n| | 73:5 | 47:7;51: 10;52:25; | brothers
(2) | 28:9;31: 19;33: 15,17; | 33:22;41 :25;45:5,17; |\n| | | 56: 16;91: 15;92:3 | 18:7;48:20 | 47: 18;70:4;79:7; | 55':3;56: 10;85:6; |\n| | 8 | bite (I) | build (I) | 89:11;98:14;102:16; | 94:8; 101:25; I03:9; |\n| | | 15:15 | 52:12 | 103:6;105:1,25; | 108:23;109:20 |\n| | back (15) | Blair (I) | building
(4) | 109:4,23 | clearly
(2) |\n| | 15:14;19:11;48:2, | 84:17 | 6: 12;58:20;67: 16; | caselaw
(I) | I 38:7;91:18 |\n| | 7,8;49:9;50: 15,16; | blank
(2) | 85:21 | 9:18 | CLERK
(IS) |\n| | 51:21;52:23;63:4; | 30:23,23 | burden
(2) | cases (4) | 2:1,11;17:2,3,7; |\n| | 87:2;89: 13;99: 15; | board
(36) | 98:7;107:24 | 4:4,20;5:2;24:
18 | 56:8,9,13;97: 12, 18, |\n| | 109:8 | 7: 18,23;57: 16,21; | business
(3) | casual
(I) | 19,22,25;99: 19; |\n| | background
(4) | 58:11,19,22;59:15, | 15:9;18:11;57:9 | 25:25 | 103:19 |\n| | 39:9;47:4,16;58:6 | 22,24;62:4,8,13,17; | businesses
(I) | Cause
(I) | Cleveland
(5) |\n| | bad (I) | 79: 13,16, 18,20,24; | 18:4 | 3:19 | 17:18;58:9;93:7,9, |\n| | 53: 19 | 80:6,8, I0, 12;83 :22, | buy (5) | CEO (I) | 11 |\n| | barrier
(2)
14:25;31:2 | 23,25;84:2;85:25;
86: 18,22;87: 15; | 6:11;10:20;61:7,
10;85:5 | 7:17 | client(4) |\n| | based (8) | 90: 10, 13;93: 10; | buying
(I) | certain
(2)
II :25;89: 19 | I 5:3;8:23;58: 17, 18 |\n| | 6: 17;15:8; 16:4; | 95:10;106:4 | 81:22 | certainly
(2) | client's
(I) |\n| | | | | | I 99:12 |\n\nMin-U-Script@ I\n\n(2) attachment - client's\n\n- ----\n\n| | | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 114
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok HoWan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | Clinic (I) | concerning
(I) | | | |\n| | 58:9 | 32:21 | 4: 16;50:6;60:3
controlled
(I) | 14,15;28: 12, 13;29:2,
6,11,13,15,20;30:21; | 98:25;102:9;
106:18 |\n| | clip (5) | concession
(I) | 106:7 | 32:11,14;34:7;35:7, | .currently
(I) |\n| | 10:5;11:22;13:10; | 21:6 | controls
(4) | 16;37:8;38: 19,25; | I 51: 16 |\n| | 91:11;92:15 | conclusions
(I) | 8: 15;10:21;87:5; | 40: 13;41: 12,19,21; | futting
(I) |\n| | clips (3) | 102: 16 | 107:11 | 43: 11,23;44:20,25; | 20: 11 |\n| | 9:3;10:4;13:5 | condense
(I) | convenience
(3) | 45:24;46:9,11,13,17; | |\n| | close (5) | 99:5 | 21:16,19,22 | 50: 13;51 :4,6;53:4, | D
I |\n| | 45: 10;63:3,5,8,15 | condition
(I) | conversation
(3) | 10;54:6,24;55: 15,22, | |\n| | closed (I) | 58:19 | 26: 1;38:24;39: I | 25;56:3;58:
15,25; | ~aily (2) |\n| | 63:18 | conditions
(2) | conversations
(I) | 59:3;60:8,22;61
:2; | I 52:15,16 |\n| | closing (2) | 61:14;108:14 | 38:23 | 62:9;63: 13;66:8, 17; | date (2) |\n| | 62:22;63:22 | conduct
(I) | COO (2) | 67: 1,9, 14;68: 13,16, | I 41 :4;49:7 |\n| | colleague
(4) | 102:3 | 6:6;57: 11 | 18,24;69: 10,21 ,25; | dated
(I) |\n| | 42: 15;47:3,8;52:20 | conducting
(2) | co-op (I) | 70:1,5,9,11,21,24; | I 45:10 |\n| | collect (13) | 102:12;103:10 | 59:1 | 71: 1,3,5, 14;72:8, 10, | daughtcr
(I) |\n| | 27:5;28:3;31:13; | conCer (I) | cooperates
(I) | 12,17,19,21 ;73:2; | I 48:19 |\n| | 39:8;42:7,13,18;52:2,
4,13,14;54: I; 109:24 | 16:1
confidential
(I) | 10:1
cooperative
(2) | 74:8,11,17,21;75:13, | day (7) |\n| | collected
(2) | 59:21 | 15:7;80:22 | 23;76:7,23;77:3,7,9,
12,12,15,18;78:
14; | 42:8;50:23;51:
I;
52: 15;58:7;81 :3; |\n| | 42:5;54:9 | confirm
(I) | copies (I) | 85:2,23;86:2,7,24; | 91:19 |\n| | collecting
(2) | 5:21 | 78:24 | 87:11,14,20;88:24; | DC (I) |\n| | 42:9,14 | conCused (2) | copy (8) | 89: 10, 13;90: 18,22; | I 45:8 |\n| | college (I) | 38:3;45:20 | 17:II ;69:22;72:2; | 92:2,8;93 :2,5,8, 12, | deal (I) |\n| | 50:2 | connection
(I) | 76:2;77:9,16;78:5,21 | 14,16,19;94:3,4,6, II, | I 109:22 |\n| | colloquy
(I) | 84:13 | copying (I) | 15,18,21,25;95:6,16, | dealing
(3) |\n| | 46:1 | consent
(2) | 78:1 | 22;96: 10,15, 19;97:4, | I 9:16;62:15;102:17 |\n| | coming (4) | 15:2;98:16 | corporate
(3) | 8,10,12,17,21,23; | Dear (3) |\n| | 15:6;73: 12;94: 10; | conservative
(6) | 4: 16;10:22; 100:7 | 98:4,5,19,23;99:7,
II, | I 20:16;21:15,18 |\n| | 103:20 | 31: 18;35:4, 10, 14, | Corporation
(2) | 15,18,20,21,22,23; | debt (2) |\n| | communicate
(3) | 15,17 | 37:4;78:20 | 100:2,6,12,17,25; | I 8:22;107:5 |\n| | 10:6;27:25;73:20 | consider
(3) | correctly
(I) | 101:6, 10, 12,15, 17; | decide (I) |\n| | Communist
(II) | 9:20;94:3; 102:21 | 21:7 | 102:9,19,21,23; | I 103:1 |\n| | 14:20,22;20:9; | considering
(I) | corruption
(I) | 103: 17,23; 104:3,8, | decided
(I) |\n| | 42: 15;47:3;48: 18; | 92:2 | 14:23 | 19;105: 12,16, 19,22; | I 108:1 |\n| | 49: 16;50:6, 14,20,25 | consistent
(2) | Counsel
(7) | 106:2,9,12,16,21,25; | deciding
(4) |\n| | companies
(3) | 38:20;65: 19 | 2:4,12;32:6;71 :7; | 107:8; I08: 1,9, 18; | I 107:6,11,14,16 |\n| | 7:24;18:15,19
company
(4) | constitutes
(I) | 72: 16,24; 107: 17 | 109:3,7 | decisions
(I) |\n| | 8:22;34: 18,18;47:4 | 29:25
constraints(l) | counsel's
(I) | courtroom
(I) | I 96:8 |\n| | complaint
(7) | 62:24 | 11:6
counter
(3) | 9:12 | deep (I) |\n| | 100: 10,13, 15,20; | contact
(9) | 6:4;21:7;91:12 | courts
(I)
46:14 | I 109:8
deCaulted (I) |\n| | 102:2,3;109:5 | 19:5;66:4,20,21 ; | counterclaims
(I) | cover (I) | |\n| | Complete
(I) | 67: 1,4;82: 18,20,21 | 3:21 | 62:18 | I 6:18
deCeat (I) |\n| | 4:15 | contacted
(I) | countered
(3) | coverage
(I) | I 8:17 |\n| | com pleted (2) | 50:10 | 21:10,12;91:6 | 62:20 | deCendant
(6) |\n| | 44:15;75:14 | contend
(I) | counters
(I) | covcring
(I) | I 2:20;3:20;10:3; |\n| | com pletely (2) | 101:17 | 91:13 | 61: 17 | 98:9; 100:25; I06: 19 |\n| | 11:12;38:20 | context
(3) | country
(3) | CPLR
(4) | deCendants
(2) |\n| | com pleteness
(2) | 13:9;15:19;95:11 | 9:25; 15:6;49:20 | 5:24;9:6;24:24; | I 12:16;108:18 |\n| | 13:7;96:9 | continue
(2) | couple (3) | 45:22 | deCendant's
(7) |\n| | completion
(I) | 50:6;51: 14 | 16:15;67:6;95:21 | credibility
(2) | I 76:20,21,24;77:
13, |\n| | 103:7 | continuing
(3) | course
(9) | 26:20;46: 15 | 23;78:13;101:1 |\n| | complicated
(2) | 44:8,24;45:20 | 10:24; 12:24;26:2, | creditors
(2) | define (2) |\n| | 26: 15;87:21 | contract
(7) | 2;95:4;99: 14;102:22; | 3:25;98:9 | I 52:1,1 |\n| | comply (I) | 15:2;63:6;75:24; | 107:7;108:9 | cross (18) | deCraud (2) |\n| | 76:9 | 76:7;85: 11;86:22; | COURT
(211) | 13:6; 16: 12;47:22; | I 3:25;98:9 |\n| | concept
(2) | 104:13 | 2:6,23;3:4,10,13; | 75: I;77:5;89: 18,20, | deCrauded
(2) |\n| | 15:6,10
concern
(I) | contradicted
(I) | 8: 17;9: 16,19,20,21; | 20,23 ;90:4;91 :4; | I 8: 10,13 |\n| | 105: 10 | 8:6
contrary
(I) | 11:10;16:1,17,21; | 95: 16;96:2,3,5,6,8, 15 | delivered
(I) |\n| | concerned
(2) | 26:13 | 17:9; 19:23;22:4;
23: 16;24:8, 15;25:3, | cultural
(I)
15: 18 | I 76:16 |\n| | 6: 17;88:20 | control
(3) | 23;26: 10, 15;27: 10, | current
(3) | demanded
(I) |\n| | | | | | I 3:20 |\n\n--\n\n**'1in-U-Script:!lI** (3) Clinic - demanded\n\n| FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 115
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | I |\n| demonstrate
(2) | 15:9 | 50:8,13,18,22 | 59:10 | encumbrance
(5) |\n| 5:15;9:1 | diced (I) | document
(37) | ears (I) | I 5:24;24: 19;44:9; |\n| demonstratives
(I) | 13:3 | 17:15;19:20;23:13; | 13: 11 | 45:22,23 |\n| 90:19 | dictionary
(I) | 25: 17;26:I,4,7,13,21; | East (I) | ~nd (2) |\n| denied (3) | 53:22 | 29: 10;40: 15;41: 10, | 17:6 | I 49:22;65:22 |\n| 8:3;24:21 ;38:22 | difference
(6) | 16,20;43:4,14,21 ; | edit (I) | enforcement
(I) |\n| denies (3) | 35:8;36:9,11,14; | 44:20;45:3,10;46:4, | 99:2 | |\n| | | | | I 98:10 |\n| 7:1,3;107:4 | 53:2,4 | 20,21,23;54:23; | educate
(I) | England
(I) |\n| denying
(I) | different
(10) | 59:24;68:3;69:15,19, | 10:25 | I 65:1 |\n| 6:3 | 18:8,10,11;27:9; | 20,24;71: 12,16, 17, | Edward
(I) | English (20) |\n| depose (3) | 29:8,8,9;66: 11;67:6; | 23;77: 14,20 | 2:14 | 15:1,4,5, 14; 19:7, |\n| 41:25;42:3,10 | 96:6 | documentary
(I) | effect (I) | 10,11 ;30:24;31: 1; |\n| deposed
(8) | difficult
(I) | 7:5 | 107:1 | 47:7;53: 18,19;68:3; |\n| 7: 18;29:23;30:3, | 75:18 | documentation
(3) | effectively
(I) | 75:7;82:25;83: I,9, 11, |\n| 19,22;31 :3, 10,24 | difficulty
(2) | 57: 14;59:22;65: 14 | 56:25 | 14,15 |\n| deposing
(2) | 31:6;42:22 | documents
(42) | efficient
(I) | enough
(6) |\n| 36:12,12 | digest (I) | 15:25;27:4,5,9; | 90:16 | |\n| deposit
(II) | | | | I 5:3;16:22;51:4; |\n| | 47: 11 | 28: 10, 10;31:4,5,13, | effort
(2) | 72:20;90:21; 109:8 |\n| 6:16;61:17,20; | direct(lI) | 21;39:8;42:7,8, 12,14, | 5:15;8:17 | enter
(2) |\n| 62:3;63: 19,24;64:7; | 9:22; 17:17;20: 16; | 19,20,22,24;45:7,8, | efforts
(5) | I
85: 11;86:22 |\n| 67: 18;80:24;81: 1,3 | 26:6;28:23;40: 14,21; | 18;47: 13, 15;49: 17; | 5:25;14:3,20; | entered
(6) |\n| deposition
(42) | 54: 15;56: 14;69:8,17 | 52:5,14;53: 10,13, 14, | 18:24;19:17 | I 75:23;76:6,16; |\n| 8:2,10;9:5,7,13; | directed
(2) | 17,20,23,25;54: 1,2; | either
(12) | 79:4; 106: 19;I07:2 |\n| 11:7,16;12:4;17:12; | 102:5;107:17 | 60:6;67: 19;78:24; | 6: 14;8: 10;22: 10, | entire
(2) |\n| 28:4;29:19,22;31 :25; | directly
(3) | 79:10,11;84:12 | 20;28: 15;42: 15,16, | I 92: 17;94: I |\n| 32:7,8,22;33: 16,18; | 8:6;46:15,16 | dollars
(I) | 17;47:9;51 :23;84:7; | entities
(16) |\n| 34:20;35: 14;38: 12, | Directors
(3) | 60:1 | | |\n| | | | 90:1 | 8:4,15; 10:19,20,21, |\n| 23;39:25;42:23 ;43:2; | 57:22;87: 15;106:4 | dominates
(I) | elder
(2) | 23;36:21,25;37:2; |\n| 66:13,15;73: 18;89:4; | disagreement
(2) | 8:15 | 48:14;50:10 | 100:11,14;104:21,25; |\n| 92:4,9;93: 17,21; | 12:24;44:19 | domination
(I) | element
(I) | 105:3; 108:12; 109: 18 |\n| 94: 12,13;95: 17,20; | disappeared
(3) | 4:16 | 98:8 | entitled
(4) |\n| 96:11,21,23;101:13; | 47:9;51 :24;52:20 | done (4) | elements
(2) | 19:6,15;96:21; |\n| 107:15 | disclosure
(I) | 14:12;15:20;65: 12; | 3: 18;4: 15 | 101:20 |\n| depositions
(I) | 75:23 | 105:4 | elicited
(I) | entitlement
(I) |\n| 13:4 | discovery
(9) | double
(2) | 32:18 | I 102:14 |\n| depth
(I) | 15:21,23;16:2; | 61 :6;85:6 | eliciting
(I) | entity
(18) |\n| 103:12 | | | | |\n| | 44: 18; 102:3, 12; | doubt
(I) | 28:21 | 27: 12;29:8,8,9; |\n| derived
(2) | 103:8;109:3,21 | 22:7 | else (6) | 52:5;81 :20,23; |\n| 62:3,4 | discrepancy
(3) | down (6) | 52: 18;54: 13;55:21; | 101:18; 105: 16,22,24; |\n| describe
(I) | 45:7,9,17 | 38:8;39:6;55:22; | 84:21 ;88: 13;105:8 | 106:2,6,7,8,10,16; |\n| 58:14 | discretionary
(I) | 63:19,25;107:3 | else's (I) | 107:13 |\n| designated
(18) | 104:4 | drafted
(I) | 13:16 | error
(I) |\n| 13:6;89:18,18; | discuss
(7) | 27:1 | email (15) | I
85:3 |\n| 90:5;91 :7, 13,15;92:5, | 22: 14;37:23;38: I, | draw
(2) | 10:6; 19:25;20:3,6, | especially
(2) |\n| 6,13,14,16,19,24; | 2,4;44:8,24 | 63:19,25 | 7,8,12,17,25;21:
1,8; | I 27:23;75: 10 |\n| 93: I,23;96:9;97:2 | discussed
(I) | drop (I) | 22: 12;77:25;78:3; | establish
(2) |\n| designations
(14) | | | | |\n| | 62:17 | 47:10 | 103:21 | I 3:24;100:18 |\n| 13:7;89:20,21,24; | discussion
(4) | duly (5) | emailed
(I) | established
(4) |\n| 91 :4,4,8;93:23; | 24:3;33:5;38:
14; | 17:I;56:7;59:2; | 22:11 | 170:11,14;102:14, |\n| 95: 16;96:2,2,3,5,6 | 39:5 | 97: 18,19 | emails
(2) | 25 |\n| detail (2) | discussions
(3) | during
(7) | 19:15;20:14 | establishes
(I) |\n| 58:15;103:12 | 19:3;37:21,24 | 6:7;11:16;12:25; | emphasize
(I) | 1102:19 |\n| detailed
(I) | displayed
(7) | 61 :5;95:4,20; I05:1 | 42:6 | estate
(I) |\n| 59:25 | 3: 12;19:22;23: 15; | duty (I) | employed
(I) | |\n| details (2) | 28: 11;40: 12;43:22; | 10:25 | | 147:6 |\n| | | | 56:18 | estimated
(2) |\n| 38:9;39:7 | 69:9 | | employee
(2) | I 61:18;103:18 |\n| detain
(I) | dispossessed
(I) | E | 48:22;51 :23 | Europe
(2) |\n| 49:19 | 98:12 | | employer
(I) | 1 48:7;49:3 |\n| determination
(3) | dispute
(4) | earlier
(2) | 18:22 | evaluate
(I) |\n| 102:24; 103:4,14 | 4: 17;18:3;44:4,21 | 79:2;99:2 | encumbered
(I) | I 26:19 |\n| determining
(I) | disputed
(I) | earliest
(3) | 98:12 | evasive (I) |\n| 103:2 | 12:6 | 21:16,19,22 | encumbering
(I) | |\n| developer
(I) | divorce
(4) | early
(I) | 24:17 | 19:14 |\n| | | | | ~vasiveness
(2) |\n| | | | | |\n\n- - --------\n\nMill-U-SCl'ipt@ (4) deJonstrate - evasiveness\n\n| | | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 116
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | I |\n| | 9:18,23 | 5,10,23;78: 13,18; | 5: 16;87: 14;88: 19; | 3: 17,18,21 ;4: 17; | freedom
(1) |\n| | even (16) | 92:4,5;93:20;96:
11 | 102: 13 | 5: 1,13;10:5; 12:13; | 14:23
I |\n| | 11:18;12:2;30:20, | exhibiting
(1) | fashion
(1) | 16: 15,23;30:20,25; | French
(1) |\n| | 24;32:7;35:6;36:
16, | 92:10 | 32:18 | 34:4;39:21 ;40: 14,22, | I 31: 1 |\n| | 20;42:21 ;46:25; | exhibits
(9) | fashioned
(1) | 24;48:4;49:25;50:
1; | Frick (1) |\n| | 47: 13;55:7;62: 10; | 12:18,20,25; 15:I; | 109:14' | 53: 16;54: 15,20,21; | I 58:8 |\n| | 86:21;104: 16;109: 15 | 24:2;42:4,5;53:
11,12 | favor (1) | 59: 19, 19,24;64: 14; | front
(13) |\n| | event (1) | exist (2) | 98: II | 69:2;78: 17;79:24; | 24:8,14,20;25:2; |\n| | 75:24 | 44:9;54:23 | FBAKOY
(2) | 90: 14;95: 19;97: 15; | 30:9,21 ;31 :7;46:22; |\n| | everybody
(2) | existence
(2) | 40:22,25 | 98:22,25;109:14. | 50:22;51 :2;53:6; |\n| | 52:17;99:10 | 46:13;107:5 | featured
(1) | five (4) | 54:12;97:3 |\n| | evidence
(36) | expeditious
(I) | 4:10 | 39:6;48: 16;49: 11; | frustrate
(5) |\n| | 4:5,8,8,9,21 ;5:7,8, | 32:18 | February
(3) | 62:18 | I 4:1;5:1;11:9; |\n| | 9,18;7:5;9:22; 12:22; | expensive
(1) | 18:18;59: 10;63:3 | five-year
(1) | 24:18;98:10 |\n| | 13:19,23; 16:8, 16; | 6:2 | feel (1) | 61:18 | full (4) |\n| | 19:24;23:22;24: 10; | explain
(4) | 108:24 | fluent
(2) | I 13:9; 17:4;56:9; |\n| | 25:2,9;26:22;41:11; | 6: 15; 18:5;30: 16; | feet (1) | 83:15,16 | 93:10 |\n| | 53:8;60:7;69: 19,20; | 36: 11 | 90:19 | focus (1) | fully (1) |\n| | 72: 10,21;78: 13; | expressio~s
(1) | feng (1) | 4:19 | I 3:1 |\n| | 90:23;92:11;93:1,25; | 13:19 | 63:7 | folder
(1) | further
(1) |\n| | 103:15;108:25 | extant
(2) | few (3) | 59:21 | I 47:20 |\n| | evidentiary
(2) | 46:3,6 | 9:3;23:25;87: 18 | follow (2) | |\n| | 90:22; 103: 11 | extended
(1) | Firth (1) | 34:5;84:24 | G |\n| | exactly (3) | 14:19 | 98:3 | followed
(1) | I |\n| | 6:12;9:25;14:11 | extensive
(2) | fight (1) | 66:1 | I
Garo
(1) |\n| | EXAMINATION
(8) | 14:20;32:15 | 11:15 | following
(5) | |\n| | 17:17;47:22;55: 16; | extensively
(1) | figure (3) | 4:4;29:23,24; | I 2:17
gather
(11) |\n| | 56: 14;75: 1;84:22; | 11:5 | 47: 12;53:22;91: 16 | 103:7;107:4 | |\n| | 96: 15;98:20 | extent
(6) | me (1) | | 27:5,8;28:3;33:6, |\n| | examine
(1) | 25:5;90:5;91 :7,12; | | follows (3) | 18;34: 17;35: 19;37: 1; |\n| | 16:12 | | 42:20 | 17:2;56:8;97:20 | 41:6;53:10,16 |\n| | | 92:8;93:24 | med (3) | force (1) | gathered
(13) |\n| | examined
(3) | F | 9:24;44: 12;46:21 | 50:7 | 22:9,14,19;30:
17; |\n| | 17:2;56:8;97:20 | | mes (1) | foreign
(6) | 31:20,21 ;36:22;37:7, |\n| | exam pies (1) | | 43:1 | 6: II ;31: I;61: 10; | 10,13 ;39:22;53 :2, 13 |\n| | 13:9 | fact (4) | fill (1) | 85:7,15;87:8 | gave (5) |\n| | exceeds (1) | 6:4;21 :5;102: 16; | 76:21 | forge (1) | I 26: 19;43:25;51 :2; |\n| | 3:20 | 104:24 | final (3) | 47:17 | 59:21;79:9 |\n| | excerpts
(I) | factor
(1) | 102:24; I03 :6, 14 | forged
(5) | gears (1) |\n| | 8:3 | 9:20 | Finally
(3) | 49: 16, 17, 18;50:21, | I 62:21 |\n| | exchanged
(1) | facts (5) | 7:6;8: 14;11:20 | 25 | general
(3) |\n| | 19:15 | 5: 19;36:6;37:9; | financial
(11) | forget
(1) | I 56:25;57: 11,11 |\n| | excised (1) | 100:15;108:2 | 7: 19,22;31 :6;47:5; | 49:7 | generally
(3) |\n| | 95:20 | fair (9) | 59:15,17,25;79:11; | form (4) | 58:6,14;82:21
I |\n| | Excluding
(1) | 12:7; 16:22;60:21; | 90:11,12,14 | 4: 16;74: 18;81 :7; | Genever
(42) |\n| | 61:5 | 72:20;79:9,15;85:7, | financials
(1) | 95:4 | 8:15,24;10:19; |\n| | excuse (4) | 8;90:21 | 7:24 | former
(3) | 33: 14,21,24;34: 13, |\n| | 11:5;19:16;20:11; | fairy (1) | find (1) | 58:7,9;84:17 | 15,15,22,23;36:21, |\n| | 95:2 | 95:10 | 68:22 | forth
(1) | 25;37:4,4;39: 12, 15, |\n| | excused (2) | False (3) | findings
(2) | 20:23 | 19;40:2;67: 16;76:6; |\n| | 55:23;88:25 | 7: 15;46: 13;107:9 | 32:16;102:15 | forward
(2) | 88:20,20;95:8,9; |\n| | excusing
(1) | familiar
(1) | fine (8) | 12: 11;20:20 | 100: 10, 14;104: 19,20, |\n| | 61:9 | 3:2 | 83: 11,14;89:15; | fought
(1) | 21,25; 105:3, 13,16, |\n| | execute (1) | family (50) | 95:24;97:6;99: 17,22; | 11: 13 | 17,23; 106:2,6, 10,22, |\n| | 67:16 | 14:19,19;15:10; | 109:18 | found (2) | 23;107:11 |\n| | Executive
(3) | 17:20,21,22,25; 18:1, | fingers
(1) | 60:25;70:22 | Gilbert
(2) |\n| | 6:6;56:23;78:8 | 2,3,5,5,8,8, I0, 10, 10, | 13:11 | four (3) | |\n| | exhibit
(36) | 11,12,13,14,15,18,22; | finished
(1) | 3: 16;5: 10;69: 17 | I 77:25;81:11 |\n| | 3: 12;19:22;23: 15; | 23:6;47:8;48:5,6,9, | 48:7 | | given (13) |\n| | 24:1,2,9;28:11;40:10, | | | France
(1) | 9:9;25:6;26: 12, 13; |\n| | | 10,11,12,14,19,24; | firm (2) | 50:2 | 31: 12;36: 10;76:2; |\n| | 12,24;41: 12,13,14; | 49:6,9,13,20,21 ;50:7; | 62:14;69:13 | fraud
(3) | 79: 16;98:21 ;99:4; |\n| | 43:21,22;53:7;69:9, | 51: 12,13, 15,20;52:2, | firms (2) | 4:25;5:5;46:
16 | 101:15;109:1,13 |\n| | 21;71: 16,21,22;72: I; | 2,8, I 1;53 :24 | 62:15;92:3 | fraudulent
(1) | gives (1) |\n| | 76:20,22,23,24 ;77:3, | far (4) | first (37) | 25:1 | I 25:7 |\n| | | | | | |\n\nMin-U-Script@ (5) even - gives\n\n| FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22
Asia v. | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 117
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | |\n| giving (13) | 45:25 | 39:3;49: 14;74:8; | 23;95:2,3;96:25; | I 24:8;25:8;29:22; |\n| 20: 18;29:24;30: 11; | halfway
(I) | 90:8;95:7;98:22,24 | 98:21 ;99: 17;100:5,9, | 30:1 |\n| 32:3;34:2,11,25; | 91:19 | hearing
(13) | 19,24; 10I: 14, 16; | important
(3) |\n| 38: 17;40:8;42: I; | hand
(2) | 13:1,8,20; 15:22; | 102: I; 103:9, 10; | I 9:9,10;30:24 |\n| 80: 13;106: 17,24 | 77:3,16 | 35: 19;45:24,25;55:5; | 104:2,6; 105:21; | Importantly
(I) |\n| globe (I) | handed
(10) | 63:7;90:22;98:7; | 106: I, 15; 107:7,22, | I 8:25 |\n| 6:20 | 17: 15;19:20;23: 13; | 100:18;103:11 | 24; 108: 15;109:6,14 | impose (I) |\n| GMail
(I) | 43: 14;69: 15,24; | heart
(I) | Honor's
(I) | I 61: 13 |\n| 20:4
goes (3) | 71 :23;77: 14,20,22
handle
(3) | 109:23 | 13: 18 | impossible
(I) |\n| 46: 15,16;107:3 | 27:24;35: II ;51 :25 | heels (1)
66:23 | hope (3)
13:21;16:6,7 | I 91: 15 |\n| Golden
(13) | handled
(3) | held (3) | hopeless
(I) | improperly
(I) |\n| 23:5;27:3;42:7; | 15:24,24,25 | 57:2;81:7,14 | 42:18 | I 107:17 |\n| 47:2;51: 16,19,21,23, | hands
(4) | help (11) | Hoplamazian
(3) | inadequate
(I) |\n| 25;52: 1,11,22;53:24 | 31:12,22;35:12; | 27:8;28:9;42: 18; | 2: 17,17;69:22 | I 79:25
inadvertently
(I) |\n| Good (13) | 47:16 | 45: 13;47:8, 18,18; | Horvitz
(18) | I 101: 18 |\n| 2:9,13,21,24; | handy
(I) | 52: 13,13,14;73: 12 | 7: 16, 16,22;8:2,8, | inappropriate
(3) |\n| 12:12;13:5;47: 12,24; | 4:7 | helpful
(I) | 12;58:2;81: 16;84:2, | I
11:13,18;72:5 |\n| 56: 16;75:3,4,8, 10 | happen
(2) | 4:11 | 8,24,25;85:3 ;89:4; | include
(4) |\n| Government
(3) | 31:2;50:19 | helps (I) | 90:7,8,12;93 :2 | I 96:4;104:25;105:3; |\n| 14:18,21,22 | happened
(9) | 7:3 | Horvitz's
(2) | 109: 18 |\n| graciously
(I) | 6:9,13;9:13;10:15; | Hey (2) | 58:6;90:24 | included
(2) |\n| 96:22 | II: 1;12:8;27:23; | 7:12;12:5 | hotel (4) | I 7:24;58:24 |\n| grant(l) | 33:15,17 | highly (2) | 6: 10,14;7:21 ;57:8 | including
(9) |\n| 103:13 | happening
(4) | 84:11,12 | hour
(4) | 18:6,7;33: 18; |\n| grateful
(I) | 14:3,4;38:9;42:24 | himself(5) | 2:7;45:25;92:
13; | 48: 19,22,25;49: I; |\n| 36:10 | happens
(I) | 10:24,25;18:7; | 94:2 | 52: 12,13 |\n| great(l) | 85:20 | 51: 15;86:20 | Huang
(I) | inconsistent
(3) |\n| 15:15 | happily
(I) | Ho (4) | 97:15 | 25:6;26: 17;38: 19
t |\n| greater
(I) | 2:7 | 2:2; 17:24;59:4; | H-U-A-N-G
(I) | index (I) |\n| 109:9 | happy
(5) | 98:2 | 97:16 | I 2:1 |\n| grew (I) | 44: 12;46: 19;91:20, | H-O (I) | hundred
(2) | indicated
(5) |\n| 14:16 | 21;99:5 | 98:2 | 18:6,9 | I 32:20;76: 12;96: I, |\n| grind
(I) | hard
(2) | Hodgson
(2) | husband
(13) | 18;108:3 |\n| 73:6 | 9:21;91:3 | 2:19,22 | 49: 13, 19, 19,19,20, | indicating
(I) |\n| grounds
(2) | HARMON
(69) | hold (2) | 22;50:1,4,8,10,11,19, | I 31:11 |\n| 3:23;70:8
grow (I) | 2:21,22;5:25;
12: 12;34:3;43: 16; | 60:10,14 | 23 | individuals
(I) |\n| 14:16 | 60:5,20;62:6;63:
II; | Holdings
(2)
37:4,4 | I | I 49:1 |\n| guarantee
(4) | 66:6,9,15;67:12;68:9, | holds (I) | | induce
(2) |\n| 61:25;67: 19;68: 19; | 15,17;69: 12,18;70:7; | 105:24 | JD (2) | I 7:21;8:19
inequity
(I) |\n| 100:3 | 71:11,15,25;72:9,18; | Hong (4) | 40:22,25 | |\n| guaranteed
(I) | 73:4;74:5,14,16,20; | 14:17;18:15;49:3; | idea (3) | I 5:2
information
(72) |\n| 8:23 | 75:2,5;76: 19,24;77:4, | 84:7 | 33:1;53:1;58:15 | 7:20,23,24;22:
10, |\n| guess (5) | 8,11,13,16,19;78:12; | Honor
(106) | identification
(I) | 10,15,15,16,19,20; |\n| 30: 15;32:2;35: 13; | 83: 17,21;84:21 ;85:4, | 2:9,13,21,24;3:
1,9, | 77:23 | 27 :2,5,6,6, 9;28: 3,3; |\n| 71: 1,1 | 9;87: 1,18,23;88:23; | 14;4:22;5:4;8: 1,12, | identified
(I) | 30: 16, 17, 18;31 :21; |\n| guessing
(I) | 89:2,12,15;92:21
; | 25;9:10,13;11:4,20; | 108:12 | 33:6,7,19;34: 17;35:3, |\n| 70:25 | 94: 17, 19,23;95:2; | 12:10, 12;13:2,5,8,21; | identify
(I) | 9,11,19,19,24;36:1, |\n| Guo (23) | 100:24;101:4,7,11, | 14:12;15:16;16:9, 10, | 3:6 | 14,23;37: I,7, 10, 12, |\n| 17:22,25,25; 18:2,5, | 14,16,22; 102:22; | 14,20,22;17:10,11; | ignore
(I) | 13,14,20;39:8,22; |\n| 5,22;23 :6;48:4,6,9, | 108:20; 109:6,11 | 19:19;23:22;24:4, 12, | 30:2 | 41 :7;42:7,8;43:9; |\n| 10,12,24;49:6;51: 12, | Haroche
(I) | 13;29: 14;30:21 ;34:3; | imagine
(I) | 49: 18;52: 14;54:9; |\n| 13,15,19;52:2,8,11; | 81:11 | 38:22;41 :8;43: 13,16, | 9:21 | 58:24;59: 15,18,20; |\n| 53:24 | hear (14) | 21;44:1,10;46:7,8,18; | IMG (1) | 60: I,2,4, 10;79:3, II, |\n| G-U-O (2) | 3:16;13:20,25; | 47:21 ;48:3;51 :9; | 58:10 | 15,18,25;80:2,4; |\n| 17:22;18:2 | 14:10;16:3;32: 16,17; | 55:3,13,14;60:5,20; | immediate
(2) | 90:11,12,14;98:22, |\n| H | 33:6;43: 10;44:3; | 62:6;63: 11;67: 12; | 48:11;104:12 | 24;101:3,8
I |\n| | 47:25;89: II ;90: 18; | 68:9;69: 18,22;70:7; | impact
(2) | initiated
(2) |\n| | 95:5 | 71:11,25;74:5;76:19; | 73:10;102:20 | I 101:19;107:13 |\n| hacked
(1) | heard
(15) | 77: 1,4,8,16;78: 12; | impeach
(2) | injunction
(2) |\n| 20:8
half(l) | 29:7,7;30: 10;33:5;
35:20;37:7, I0;38:25; | 83: 17;89:2,7;90:7; | 28: 17,20 | I
109:19,19 |\n| | | 92: 12;93:23;94: 17, | impeachment
(4) | i1nquired (3) |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (6) giving - inquired\n\n| | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 118
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 64: 10;66:3;82:3 | 106:8 | knew (13) | 68: 10;71 :6;72: 16,24, | 83:10
I |\n| | inquiry
(I) | issue (25) | 21: 1;22:4,8,25; | 25;74: 13;75:7;82: 18; | lengthy
(I) |\n| | 82:6 | 3: 17,21,22;4: 12,12, | 25:22;27:4;69:2; | 83:5,23;84:4;
101: 13 | I 98:20 |\n| | instructed
(2) | 14;15:17, 18;24:4, 10, | 76:5;80: 12,17, 19; | | less (2) |\n| | 11:10;83:2 | 15,19;26: 14;41: 18; | 81:22;105:2 | L | :
99:3,9 |\n| | instructing
(I) | 51 :25;54: 16;55:4; | knowledge
(39) | | leiter
(8) |\n| | 11:24 | 88:16;91:14,24; | 5:20,20;26:24; | laid (2) | I 64:25;71:9;72:4,7, |\n| | instruction
(I) | 102:2,7,17; 103: 12; | 27:7,21;28:1;29:11; | 44:2; 100:21 | 8,19;78:5,17 |\n| | II: 18 | 108:2 | 31:20,21 ;32:21 ;33:3, | language
(10) | leiters
(2) |\n| | instructions
(I)
11:6 | issued (2) | 8,11;34:14;35:18,22; | 14:25; 15: 17;30:24, | I 84:14,16 |\n| | intend
(I) | 88:1 ;104:4
issues (12) | 36:6,7,22;37:3,6,9,
13,14,15;43:9;47:5,6; | 25,25;31: 1,2;36: 15; | liar (I)
47:17 |\n| | 100:22 | 2:25;3:6;5:22; | 53: 1,2;54:8, 16,18,22; | 53: 17;54: 12
last (13) | !
liberties
(I) |\n| | intended
(I) | 10: 15;15:21,23;16:2; | 55:7,9,10;62:7;64:3 | 11:20;13:10;18:21; | I |\n| | 92:23 | 24: I;52:21 ;54: 12; | known
(2) | 26:6;32: 19;44:2; | 95: 11
lied (3) |\n| | intending
(I) | 100:8;109:22 | 3:20;84:8 | 50:9;82:22;86:8; | I 8:10;107:12,14 |\n| | 99:4 | issuing
(I) | knows (3) | 95:7;97: 15; 102:6; | life (I) |\n| | intends
(I) | 102:21 | 9:25;28: 14;52: 18 | 109: 12 | I 51:21 |\n| | 11:8 | | Kong (4) | later
(2) | lifted (2) |\n| | intent (10) | J | 14:17;18:16;49:3; | 9:11;68:23 | i 44:18;45:19 |\n| | 3:25;4:6,18;5: I; | | 84:7 | law (2) | light (I) |\n| | 14:2;24: 18;25: I; | jail (4) | Kwok (154) | 62:14;70:2 | I
61:1 |\n| | 98:9;107:18;108:11 | 14:21 ;48: 17,18,21 | 2:3;3:25;5: 16,22; | lawsuit
(I) | likely (I) |\n| | intention
(I) | Jillian
(I) | 6:7,13,18,24;7:
1,3,7, | 78:25 | I 12:17 |\n| | 103: 11 | 2:19 | 20,25;8:3,9,14,15,23; | lawsuits
(I) | limited
(3) |\n| | interest
(I) | job (I) | 9: 1,10,13,24; 10:5,10, | 9:24 | ~ 31:15;54:11;80:12 |\n| | 107:23 | 42:16 | .20;11:6,17,23;13:10; | lawyer
(3) | line (2) |\n| | interested
(3) | joined
(I) | 14:6,7,8,11,13,15,15, | 39:8,9;50: 10 | I 34:5;91 :24 |\n| | 9:8;99:12,13 | 102:2 | 16,23,25; 15:4, 16,19; | lawyers
(2) | lines (3) |\n| | interests
(I) | Jones
(I) | 16:11;17:19,24;18:1, | 54:12;69:5 | I 38:13;91:21;108:2 |\n| | 8:4 | 58:7 | 13;19:3,6,6,9,9, 17; | Leading
(6) | listed (2) |\n| | International
(I) | judgment
(9) | 21:9, 12,24;22:4,8,13, | 27: 13;54:3;66:6,9, | I 58:17;106:12 |\n| | 58:10 | 4: 1;5: 1;6:22;9:2; | 20,22,25;23:4;27:
10, | 11;74:7 | listen (I)
, |\n| | interpreter
(7) | 11:9,10;24: 18;98: 10; | 18;28: 14,23;29:3; | learn
(4) | , 53: 18 |\n| | 97: 10,12, 14,15, 18, | 109:25 | 33: 13,20;37:24;38:5, | 25:24;33:16;47:11; | litigating
(I) |\n| | 21;103:18 | June
(I) | 14;39:1,11,14,19; | 68:25 | I
102:13 |\n| | interrogating
(I) | 78:21 | 40: 1;48: 13,13;51 :15; | learned
(6) | litigation
(3) |\n| | 49:19
interrupt
(2) | Justice
(2) | 59:4,4,12;60:9;61
:5, | 29:10;33:15,17; | 152:13;101:19; |\n| | 91:2;94:8 | 7: 14;25:23 | 9,22;62: 16,19,24; | 48: 12;64:23;70: 14 | 107:13 |\n| | interrupting
(I) | K | 63: 18;64:9;65:4, 14, | learning
(2) | l,itt1e(6) |\n| | 41:9 | | 22;66:3,10;67:
10,15,
24;68:4,13,21 ;69:5; | 25:24;31: I | ' 47:7;51:10;56:16; |\n| | into (14) | Kathy
(10) | 70:5,12,18;71 :6; | lease (10)
7: 10;62: 1;67:20, | I 57:10;92:3;105:15
live (3) |\n| | 12:22;19:11;24:10; | 19: 1,6,7,12;21 :8; | 73:6;74: 18;75:6; | 22;68:7,10,16;70:
13; | I
49:2,3;98:3 |\n| | 29:25;30:23;45:21, | 22:8,11,20,23;64:
14 | 76:6,12,17;78:25; | 88:17,21 | lives (6) |\n| | 25;66: 11;72: 10;76:7; | keeps (2) | 79: 12,21;80: 13;81:1, | least (3) | 17:18;25:7;83:12; |\n| | 85:11;86:22;92:11; | 41 :9;88:4 | 6,22;82:2,10,23; | 47:7;70: 16;95:21 | 93:7,9,10 |\n| | 103:11 | kept (I) | 84:10;85:11,14,18; | leave (I) | living (I) |\n| | introduce
(I) | 59:21 | 86: 14,16;87:5;90: 10; | 33:9 | I 33:9 |\n| | 25:9 | key (2) | 95:10,11;97:9,11; | leaving
(2) | LLC (23) |\n| | involve (5) | 5:22;23:25 | 98:2,20;99:3; 101: I, | 42:17;50:5 | 6:11,11;34:18,18; |\n| | 27:24;35:11;38:8, | kidnap
(I) | 17;104: 11;105:7,14, | left (5) | 37:4;61 :6,10;81: 12, |\n| | 9;86: 18 | 47:3 | 18,19; 1~6:20,22; | 42: 17;47:9;49: 10, | 14;85:5,6,7,15;86: 12, |\n| | involved (8) | kidnapped
(3) | 107:4,8,12,14,17 | 10;51 :23 | 13,17,20;87:3,5,8; |\n| | 27:7;57: 12,14, 18; | 42: 15;47:9;48:21 | K-W-O-K
(2) | leftover
(I) | 105:13,14,17 |\n| | 87:3,7,8;92:3 | killed (I) | 18:1;98:2 | 51:24 | I1LC's (I) |\n| | Ira (I) | 11:25 | Kwok's
(36) | legal (8) | I 6: 11 |\n| | 77:25 | kind (3) | 5: 14,17;8:2;9:5; | 4:5; 10:I;25: 17, 19; | located
(I) |\n| | irrelevant
(I) | 31 :5;34: 17;39:23 | 11:23;12:2;14:2; | 26: I;31:6;53:20; | I 48:25 |\n| | 67:13 | kinds (I) | 17:21,23; 18:3, 15,24; | 105:12 | logic (I) |\n| | irrespective
(I) | 37:12 | 19:1;23:7;48:11; | legally (I) | L
39:10 |\n| | 90:1 | Kingdom
(I) | 58:3;62:15,22;64:
16, | 87:13 | ondon
(I) |\n| | Islands
(I) | 84:17 | 21,24;65:4,6;66:
19; | length
(I) | ! 83:12 |\n| | | | | | i |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (7) inquiry - London\n\n| | | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 119
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | long (5)
47: 11;57:2,8; | many (6)
4:3; II: 16;44: 17; | 38:6,6;39: 18;61: 12
merits
(8) | 70:16 | 7: 14;8:9; 106:20
I |\n| | 92: 16;108:21 | 50:5;57: 17;81: 19 | 10:13;12:17;24:3; | monthly
(1)
6:18 | Myself(l) |\n| | longer (4) | March
(4) | 102:4,12,16; 103:6; | months
(7) | I 36:4
mysterious
(1) |\n| | 14:4;70: 17;102:23; | 41 :24;43:6;63:4,5 | 109:21 | 44:17;45:19;49:11, | I 107:10 |\n| | 103:24 | Mark
(3) | message (3) | 14,24;50: 12;78:23 | |\n| | long-term
(1) | 2:21 ;72: 1;75:5 | 19:9,11;22:22 | more (23) | N
I |\n| | 48:22 | marked
(2) | messages
(1) | 6: 1;9:22; 18:6,9; | |\n| | look (18) | 77:22;89:6 | 10:7 | 20:9;25: 1;48: 10, 13, | I
name (23) |\n| | 12:10;23: 12;25: 12; | market
(6) | messenger
(2) | 14;49:14,24;50:11; | 6:9;7: I; J 7:4,5,23, |\n| | 28:9,13;29:3,19; | 6:3;55:7,11,12,18, | 22:18,21 | 55: 14;59:25;83 :21, | 25; 18:I;20: 19;56:9; |\n| | 32:11;41:19;53:14, | 20 | met (4) | 22;86:21 ;89:9;90: 16; | 60: 14, 18;64: 16, 17, |\n| | 21 ;54:7;62:9;70: II;
78: 16;92:2;93:2;95:6 | married
(1) | 59:24;75:5; 102: 11; | 94:19;102:9,15; | 18;68: 14;74:4;80: 19; |\n| | looking (1) | 50:3
material
(1) | 107:23
Michael
(4) | 108:25
morning
(10) | 82:22;88:8;97: 15,15, |\n| | 50:15 | 8:18 | 56: 11;58:2;90:7,7 | 2:7,10,13,21,25; | 25;98:3
necessarily
(3) |\n| | Looks (1) | malter
(4) | mid (1) | 3:6; 12: 12;47:24; | I 85: 16;86: 18;87:9 |\n| | 40:20 | 2:2;24:22; 104: 1,20 | 71:2 | 52:25;56: 16 | necessary
(2) |\n| | lot (19) | mailers
(1) | might (2) | MOSS (86) | I 14:7;61:1 |\n| | 19:8;20:8,18; | 97:23 | 53:6;98: 10 | 2:9,13,14,24;3:8, | need (17) |\n| | 24: 16;27: I;31 :2; | may (23) | Miles (7) | 11,14;10:10,18;11:4, | 6:23;10:2;11:15; |\n| | 42:8,20;47:8;48:
18; | 8:21 ;9:7; 19:19; | 20: 17;21: 16,19,21, | 20; 12: 10;16: 14, 19, | 25 :9;32: 13;45 :2; |\n| | 49: 16;50:21 ;52: 19, | 33:6;38: 1;41:4,22; | 24;48: 13;59:4 | 22;17:11,18;19:19, | 50: 13;53:7;54: 13; |\n| | 21;53: 17;54:9;75: 12; | 43:5,13;47: 1;55:22; | Mileson
(5) | 24;23: 17,22;24: 12; | 74: II ;76:21 ;77:9; |\n| | 98:6;99:3
lots (2) | 67: 10;70: 10;74: 18; | 64: 16,20,21 ;82: 17; | 28:4;34:3,8;38:22; | 83:3;98:20; I07:3; |\n| | 29:21 ;51:24 | 75:11;77:16;83:18;
86: 10;91 :24;95:6; | 83:6
million (8) | 41: 14;43: 13, 19;
44: I0;46:7,1 0, 18; | 108:3;109:16 |\n| | loud (2) | 104: 15;108:5; 109:2 | 21:2,7;22:4,23; | 47:20;54:3;55:
14,17, | needed
(3)
I 2:7;32:8;67:5 |\n| | 17:3;56:10 | maybe
(3) | 61:21;63:23,24;64:
1 | 21 ;89:23;90:2,4,21, | needs (1) |\n| | loyal (1) | 12:4;53: 18;99: 1 | millions
(1) | 24;91:6,11,17,20; | 15:18
I |\n| | 50:1 | mean (1I) | 42:12 | 92: 1,7, 12,20,25;93:4, | negotiate
(1) |\n| | LP (1) | 35:2;36:22,24; | mind (1) | 7,9,13,15,18,22;94:5; | I 27:25 |\n| | 73:13 | 38: I, I,4;48: 10; | 53:3 | 95: 15;96: 14, 16;97:9; | Neither
(1) |\n| | lunch (2) | 52: 16;54: 19;67: I; | minimum
(1) | 98:21,24;99:9,14,17; | I 4:25 |\n| | 99:1,8 | 91: 18 | 106:21 | 100:5,9,13,19;104:2, | . nephew
(1) |\n| | M | meaning
(2) | Minister
(1) | 5,9; 105: 15, 18,21 ,25; | I 48:20 |\n| | | 36:13;55:10
means
(1) | 84:17
minute
(1) | 106:6,11,15,18; | nephews
(1) |\n| | main (2) | 22:10 | 61:12 | 107:7,21
most (1) | I 48:15
nervous
(9) |\n| | 104:9,10 | meet (5) | minutes
(5) | 54:9 | I 30: 19,20,22;31 :4,8, |\n| | Mainland
(1) | 4:5;7:3; 16:1;50: I; | 9:4;32: 19;39:6; | motion
(1I) | 22;36: 16, 18;47: 14 |\n| | 49:2 | 107:24 | 58:19;91:9 | 5:18;8:18;11:21; | New (34) |\n| | mainly (1) | meeting
(7) | misreading
(1) | 12:16; 13:21 ;23:8; | 6: 11;9: 18;17:6,6; |\n| | 59:23 | 27:25;62:4,13; | 7:14 | 25: 15;29:21 ;73: 13; | 18:19;23:5;27:3; |\n| | maintenance
(3) | 83:22,23,25;84:2 | misrepresentations
(6) | 108:6,17 | 34: 15, 18,18,23;49:5, |\n| | 61: 18;62:20;81:4 | meetings
(1) | 7:7;8:8,17,19;9:
19; | motions
(3) | 8;51: 12,17, 19,21,23; |\n| | makes (2) | 58:19 | 24:25 | 13:24;16:6,21 | 52: 1,2;56: 12, 12; |\n| | 9: 18;99: I | meets (1) | misrepresenting
(1) | move (8) | 57: 12;59: I;86: 12, 14, |\n| | making
(5)
45:5;52: 16,17; | 4:21
member
(5) | 8:9
missing (1) | 3:2;46: 18, 19;49:5; | 19,22;87:3;98:22,24; |\n| | 66:4;103:14 | 18:10,14;48:19; | 95:6 | 56: 17;70:2;99:2;
109:21 | 106:6,12,22
Next (9) |\n| | malfeasance
(1) | 105:14,19 | misstates
(1) | moved (1) | 6:5;7: 16;32:24; |\n| | 5:2 | members
(2) | 28:25 | 63:18 | 55:25;63: 14;88:24; |\n| | management
(2) | 18:13;57:16 | mockery
(1) | moving
(1) | 89:3;95: 15;97:8 |\n| | 57:8;58:10 | memorandum
(1) | 9:14 | 72:10 | niece (2) |\n| | manager
(3) | 70:2 | Mom (1) | much
(4) | I 48:15,19 |\n| | 56:25;57:11,11 | memorialized
(1) | 51:2 | 63:24;81 :3;97: 1; | Nine (1) |\n| | manages
(1) | 32:15 | momept
(2) | 103:24 | I 57:5 |\n| | 83:2 | memory
(3) | 30:2;83:17 | multi-media
(1) | nitpick
(1) |\n| | Mandarin
(4)
30:25;97: 14, 17,21 | 7: I;30:22;42:23
mention
(3) | money (3) | 13:2 | I 62:9 |\n| | Mannis
(1) | 22: 14;38:2;39:23 | 8:20;33:2;99: 13
month
(5) | multiple
(3)
48:25;70:8;94:9 | iObOdY (3)
33:4,5;105:2 |\n| | 65:1 | mentioned
(4) | 50: 10;55: 19,19,20; | must (3) | r |\n| | | | | | one (I) |\n\n- -- -\n\nMin-[J-Scripl@ (8) long - None\n\n| | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 120
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 81:5 | off (9) | opporlunily
(2) | 6:9; 11:17;28: 17, | barties
(4) |\n| | normal
(I) | 20:11;24:23;47:10; | 16:11;36:10 | 18,19;29:6,8;34:
18; | I 3:5,18;44:5;90:20 |\n| | 96:8 | 55:18,19;57:15; | opposing
(I) | 60:3,14,18;68:
14; | parlner
(I) |\n| | nole (4) | 104:3,5,6 | 5:18 | 74:4;80:19;81:
16,17, | I 58:7 |\n| | 2:4,11;30:1;97:13 | offer (14) | opposilion
(3) | 19;96:9; 105:7 | parIs (2) |\n| | noled (I) | 6:4;20: 19,24;21 :2, | 12:1;23:8;25:15 | owned
(9) | I 18:11;96:6 |\n| | 59:2 | 10,13;22:5,12,17,23, | option
(I) | 7:25;8:5;27: 11,11; | party
(13) |\n| | notes (I) | 25;23:23;78:
12; | 8: II | 28:23;86: 13;95:8; | 9:7,8;20:9;42: 16; |\n| | 63:4 | 92:23 | oral (4) | 105: 14, 17 | 47:3;48: 18;49: 16; |\n| | notice (16) | offered
(5) | 44:2,16;102:6; | owner
(12) | 50:6,14,20,25;86:
17, |\n| | 76:17;85:11,16,17, | 62:16,16;71:12; | 109:12 | 30:6;79:21 ;80:22; | 20 |\n| | 19;98: 17,19;104:5,7, | 96:14,16 | order
(26) | 81:8, 10;85: 15;86:2, | pass (I) |\n| | 10,11,12; 106: 17,24; | oflband
(I) | 13:4;46: 14;75:22; | 15;88:5,20; 105: 12; | I 31:21 |\n| | 108:11;109:1 | 81:18 | 76:2,16;78:21 ;79:4; | 106: 13 | passed (2) |\n| | noticed (I) | office (I) | 80: 13;88:7;91 :5; | ownership
(17) | I 22:22;47: 16 |\n| | 96:2 | 52:2 | 98:7; 102:9,25;104:6, | 8:4; 15:7,8, 10,13; | passel (I) |\n| | notify (I) | OFFICER
(9) | 7,10,11,23;105:2; | 28:6,8;29: 17;30: 15; | I 12:20 |\n| | 70:18 | 17:9;27: 15;56:24; | 106: 18,22,25,25; | 32:21 ;39:2;85: 14; | passport
(I) |\n| | November
(I) | 75: 13;76:5;77: 12; | 107:2;108:2,15 | 86:3,12,17,20;105:23 | 50:17
I |\n| | 20:1 | 78:9;98:4;99:23 | ordered
(2) | owns (21) | Paul (I) |\n| | number
(9) | official (5) | 103:19,21 | 10:20;27: 18;28: 14; | I 99:18 |\n| | 2: 1;5:23,25; 12:18; | 53:20;78:8;97:
12, | orders
(2) | 29:3,9;32: 1;33: 13,21, | pause (4) |\n| | 48: 13,16, 16;76:22; | 17,21 | 11:10;102:21 | 21,24;34: 13,15,18, | 4:23;24: 15;56: I; |\n| | 91:23 | old (3) | ordinary
(I) | 22;86: 13, 13,14; | I
83:19
I |\n| | numbers
(2) | 49:11,12;50:23 | 32:18 | 95: 12; 105: 18; 106:2, | PAX (2) |\n| | 91:21,24 | O'Melveny
(4) | organizations
(I) | 7 | I
12:2;73: 13 |\n| | | 2:14,15,18;69:1 | 53:24 | | pay (4) |\n| | 0 | once (2) | originally
(2) | P | I 9:2;11:9;62:19; |\n| | | 102:7;104:13 | 92:23;99:4 | | 81:4 |\n| | object(4) | one (53) | Ostrager
(2) | Pacific
(I) | paying (I) |\n| | 14:I0;71: 17;89:21; | 4: 18,18,23;5:23; | 7:14;25:23 | 2:2 | I 8:22 |\n| | 94:19 | 10:18;11:20;13:9; | others
(3) | package
(3) | people (16) |\n| | objeclion
(31) | 15:I; 18:9,13, 14, 18; | 53:23,24;54:2 | 58:21,21,22 | 18:6,9;22: 18;27:5, |\n| | 23:23;24: 13;26:8; | 22:4;24: I, 15;29: 13; | otherwise
(I) | page (18) | 9;28:2,3;31: 14, 18; |\n| | 27: 13;28:25;32:9; | 32:8,13;41: 18;42:2, | 108:13 | 20: 17;21 :20;26:6; | 39:23;42:6;48:
13; |\n| | 41 :8;43:20,20,25; | 10,11 ;44:5;45:9, 13; | ought
(I) | 29: 19;31 :25;34:5; | 67:4,4,7;81: 19 |\n| | 54:3;60:5,20,22; | 47: 15;49: I0;50:23; | 71: 16 | 38: 12;39:25;40: 15, | people's
(I) |\n| | 62:6;63: II ;66:6; | 51: I;55: 14,19, 19,20; | ourselves
(2) | 22,23,24;69:
17; | I 31 :16 |\n| | 67: 12;68:9;70:7; | 62: 15;66: 19;74: 1; | 45: 14;62:20 | 78: 17;91: 16,20,23; | percent
(3) |\n| | 71: 11;72:9, 18;74:5, | 77:4;83:21,22;84:16; | out (12) | 92:1 | 35: 18;36:8;45:4
I |\n| | 14,16,20;78: 15; | 85:6,6;96:24;98:8; | 4:2; 19:8;44:2; | pages (2) | Perfect
(I) |\n| | 94:14,17,23 | 100:22;103:19; | 47: 12;53:22;68:22; | 42:11,12 | I
16:19 |\n| | objections
(13) | 104: 10,21;105:5,9, | 70:22;85: 19;89:3; | paid (I) | perhaps
(I) |\n| | 10:12;12:20;15:24; | 18,20; 108:5 | 91: 16;95:3; 100:21 | 52: 17 | I 89:5 |\n| | 89:7,14,19;90: I; | one-day
(I) | outline
(I) | paper
(6) | period
(4) . |\n| | 92:9;93:24;94:9; | 45:24 | 99:2 | 28:6,8;30:9;31
:7; | I 61:18;66:1;70:15; |\n| | 95:3,19,21 | ones (2) | out-of-slate
(I) | 43:1;90:20 | I 80:12 |\n| | obligations
(I) | 41:18;96:5 | 93:14 | papers
(II) | perjury
(I) |\n| | 6:19 | ongoing
(I) | outside
(I) | 7:12,15;12:1; | I 5:16 |\n| | obtained
(4) | 24:3 | 45:13 | 29: 17,21;46:2;69: I,4, | perplexed
(I) |\n| | 22: 10,15;45:8,8 | only (13) | outstanding
(I) | 4;76: 11,15 | I 92:3 |\n| | obviate
(I) | 2:8;31: 19;47:6; | 52:21 | paragraph
(6) | person
(17) |\n| | 108:3 | 59:20;83:7,8;91:
14; | over (4) | 28:24;54: 15, 17,20, | 18:7;19:5;35:17; |\n| | obviously
(4) | 92: 14;93:25;94:3; | 41: 18;51:22;57: 10; | 21;78:17 | 42:5,14;47:7;50:
I; |\n| | 22: 17;24:8,14;. | 102: 17;105:22;106:3 | 79:12 | parents
(I) | 66:4,21,22;67:2; |\n| | 107:22 | opening
(3) | overruled
(4) | 48:15 | I 81:6;82: 18,20,21; |\n| | occupancy
(6) | 3:9;9:4; I00:21 | 27: 14;94:21,25; | part
(6) | 84: I0;88: 17 |\n| | 61:23;67: 17,18,24; | operate
(2) | 95:22 | 5:24; 16: 10;53: 10, | personal
(42) |\n| | 68:7,18 | 52:3,5 | overview
(I) | 12;89:22;96: I | 22: 15, 16,19;26:24; |\n| | occurred
(I) | Operating
(3) | 3:16 | particular
(3) | 27:7,21;28:1;29:11; |\n| | 96:6 | 56:24;76:5;78:9 | owed (I) | 24:1;46:4;61:13 | 30: 18;31 :20;32:20; |\n| | o'clock (I) | operation
(2) | 107:5 | particularly
(I) | 33:3,11;34: 14;35:3,9, |\n| | 99:16 | 52:15,16 | own (19) | 72:3 | 11,18,22,24;36: I,5,7, |\n| | | | | | |\n\n-- -- --\n\nMin-U-Script@ (9) normal- personal\n\n| | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 121
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 13,22;37:6,9,13,15, | 2:4,11;17:3;21:16, | preferable
(I) | 15:23;104:10; | I 45:14 |\n| | 20;43:9;49: I8;53: I;
54:8,16,18,22;55:9; | 18,21;26:7;40: 10; | 46:19 | 105:5 | pulled (I) |\n| | 62:7;67: 18;68: 19; | 56:9;69: 17;74:2;
97:12,25 | preference
(I)
77:1 | proceed
(7) | 45:13 |\n| | 84:3 | pledge (37) | prejudgment
(I) | 2:8;16:17;41:19;
94: 15; 100:3; 107:25; | purchase
(19)
8:20; 15:3;33:2,8, |\n| | personally
(4) | 24:4,5,15,19;38:2, | 44:17 | 108:4 | 11;44:3;57: 12;58:4, |\n| | 27:22;37:23;61 :25; | 7,10;41 :2,4,22;43 :6, | prejudice
(2) | proceeding
(3) | 12;59:7;61 :3, 14; |\n| | 67:24 | 10;44:9,11,18,21; | 108:10,23 | 9: 14;25:20;46: 14 | 62: 15;83:23;86: 19, |\n| | persons
(I) | 45:1,6,11,18,19;46:3, | prejudiced
(I) | proceedings
(3) | 22;87:7;90: 10, 13 |\n| | 108:II | 6,11,12,14;47: 14; | 107:20 | 9: 19;56:2;83:20 | purchased
(II) |\n| | phone (I) | 68:8,20;72:5;76:
12; | pre-marked
(I) | process
(10) | :
27:22,23;33:10; |\n| | 84:1 | 79:3; 101:20,21 ,23; | 76:25 | 6:7;10:1;57:13; | 65: 15;67: 15;68: 13; |\n| | phrased
(I) | 107:12;108:12 | prepare
(I) | 58: 14;59: 13;62:25; | , 70:12;81:6,13;101:1; |\n| | 103:10 | pledged
(24) | 106:25 | 65: 13, 16,17;84: 13 | 107:8
I |\n| | pieces (I) | 7:9,13;24:20; | prepared
(2) | production
(I) | purchaser
(4) |\n| | 43:1 | 37: 19;39: 12,15,20; | 9:15;103:15 | 15:25 | 8:25;60:17;63:15; |\n| | piercing
(14)
4: 15,15,24;5:7,8,9; | 40:2,5,19;41 :21;43:5, | present
(2) | professional
(2) | 64:5
I |\n| | 100:7,16,18,22; | 8,8;68:21 ;69:3 ;70:6,
13,17,19,23; 101:I8; | 90:23;96:12
presentation
(6) | 47:5,6
project
(I) | purchasers
(I) |\n| | 102:20,25; 103: 12, 16 | 105:1,9 | 13:3,22; 16:4;84:3; | 42:9 | I 85:5
purchases
(I) |\n| | Ping (I) | pledges
(IS) | 89:4,22 | proof (2) | 57:18 |\n| | 17:5 | 5:23;7:8;24: 17,23, | (4)
presented | 4:19;103:2 | purchase-sale
(1) |\n| | place (3) | 25;37:3,16,25;38:5, | 12:19;13:5;88:11; | proper
(2) | I 87:6 |\n| | 45:6; 104:6; I09:2 | 15;44: 1,6,7;45: 16; | 97:5 | 15:22;24:9 | purchasing
(3) |\n| | placed (I) | 105:3 | presently
(I) | property
(4) | I 14:2;58:16;64:6 |\n| | 76:12 | pledging
(2) | 109:10 | 58: 17;87:4;98: 12; | purely
(1) |\n| | places (I) | 37:22;106:24 | President
(IS) | 107:23 | I 104:4 |\n| | 48:25 | plus (3) | 6:6;7: I8;27:3; | propose
(I) | purported
(2) |\n| | plainly (I) | 31: 13;36: 15;67: 19 | 51: 16;52: 11;56:23; | 100:3 | , 60:10,14 |\n| | 11:7 | pm (2) | 57:24,25;58: 1,3;59:1, | proposing
(2) | purporting
(1) |\n| | plaintiff
(8)
2: 14,16, I8; 10:2; | 99:24; 103:22 | 22;78:9;90:8;93:
10 | 100: 18,20 | I 60:3 |\n| | 102:10,19;103:25; | pockets
(I)
109:8 | presume
(I) | proprietary
(9) | purpose
(3) |\n| | 107:5 | point (12) | 79:11
pretenses
(I) | 62: 1;67:20,21;
68:6,10,16;70: 13; | I 9:8,10;73:12 |\n| | plaintiffs
(16) | 5:5; 13:25;44:5,5,6; | 107:9 | 88: 17,21 | purposes
(2)
I 12:15;25:8 |\n| | 13:22; 14:13;16:3, | 45:9,15,19;47:
14; | pretty
(I) | prospective
(2) | pursuant
(I) |\n| | 10;76:3;78:24;79:6, | 95:25; 104:14;108: 16 | 12:7 | 60:16;63:15 | i
45:22 |\n| | 7;89:6;97:2; 100:3,7; | points
(I) | previously
(4) | protect
(I) | put (25) |\n| | 102:I, 14,25; 109:8 | 95:19 | 2:6;28: 16,19;52:20 | 62:20 | 3:4;4:2;6:2,15; |\n| | plaintifrs
(2) | political
(I) | price (I) | protection
(I) | 13:10;19:11;20:19, |\n| | 14:5;98:11 | 107: 10 | 58:18 | 102:10 | 23;24: 19;25:2;26:23; |\n| | plan (I) | portion
(5) | prime
(2) | proud
(I) | 41 :23;42:20;48: 18, |\n| | 38:3 | 21:18,21;92:15; | 13:9;84:17 | 52:24 | 21 ;54: 12;58:20,21, |\n| | play (10) | 96:20;97:1 | principal
(I) | prove
(10) | 22;62:24;89:20,23, |\n| | 9:5; 10:4; 11:14,14; | portions
(6) | 5:17 | 4:9,10,14,25;5:4,9, | 25;91:7;103:15 |\n| | 13:15;28:4;92: 14,16; | 12:23;89:7,19; | prior
(8) | 21;7:15;12:16; | putting
(3) |\n| | 93:25;96:20
played (13) | 92: 10;93:21 ;96:22 | 5:18;11:21;25:6; | 100:22 | : 12:11;57:14;79:10 |\n| | 10:9,17;11:3,19; | position
(10)
42: 18;56:22;57:2; | 26: I8,19;53:9;62:14; | provide
(8) | PX (6) |\n| | 12:5,9;28:5;91: 1; | 72:25;88:21; 100:6, | 106:22
priority
(2) | 3:15;13:4;17:13;
59: 15;60: 13;65: 13; | 19:24;23:17;43:19; |\n| | 94: 16,22;95: I, 14; | 14;101:1,8,24 | 24:7,22 | 104:12;106:20 | 46:24;69:8,12
1 |\n| | 96:23 | possible
(I) | prisoner
(I) | provided
(II) | |\n| | playing
(10) | 50:14 | 107:10 | 7:20;59: I8, 19,20; | Q
I |\n| | 90:6;91:5,8,12,13, | potential
(3) | probability
(I) | 65: 14,15;69: 13; | 4uality
(I) |\n| | 16;92: 15;93: 16;94: I; | 4: I; 107: 12;109: I | 3:19 | 78:20;80:4;81:
I; | ; 92:2 |\n| | 96:22 | practical
(2) | probably
(4) | 98:18 | quick
(3) |\n| | pleaded
(I) | 103:25;104:20 | 31 :23;92: 13;96: 10; | provides
(I) | I 48:2;87:24;95:
19 |\n| | 100:15 | practice
(I) | 99:9 | 102:9 | quickly
(4) |\n| | pleading
(I) | 65:20 | problem
(8) | public
(2) | 3:3;11:25;53:21; |\n| | 24:9 | precluding
(I) | 4: I8;7: 10;24:7; | 6:1;9: 12 | 73:5
1 |\n| | pleasantries
(2) | 106:22 | 104:9; 105:6; 108: 19, | publicly
(I) | quietly
(I) |\n| | 83:7,8
please (13) | prefer
(I) | 21,22 | 8:3 | I 11 :25 |\n| | | 107:22 | problems
(3) | pull (I) | quit (I) |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@\n\n(10) personally - quit\n\n| | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 122
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 42:16 | 18:25;102:1 | 3:2,9 | 6:21 | ~uling (1) |\n| | quite (5) | recess (2) | remember
(13) | respond
(6) | I 103:4 |\n| | 33:22;35:3;52:25; | 56:5;99:25 | 5:23;31 :4,9,23; | 10:7; 16:14;46:7; | rulings
(1) |\n| | 91:15;92:12 | recognize
(3) | 38:7;39:21 ;42:2,10; | 65:8,11;71:10 | 103:6
I |\n| | quitted
(1) | 15:16;31: 16;47: 15 | 43: 12;46:25;61: 19; | responded
(3) | running
(1) |\n| | 51:24 | recollection
(2) | 63:7;84:7 | 71:15,18;82:9 | I 109:8 |\n| | quoted
(1) | 21:2;66:13 | removed
(3) | response
(5) | Russ (2) |\n| | 11:21 | recommended
(1) | 98:13;101:21,24 | 71 :6;72:2,4,24; | I 2: 19,22 |\n| | | 90:13 | rendered
(1) | 86:7 | |\n| | R | recommending
(1) | 98: 11 | responsibilities
(3) | S |\n| | | 7:23 | renew (2) | 52:4,7,10 | I |\n| | raise (1) | reconcile
(1) | 108:7,24 | responsibility
(2) | I
safeguards
(4) |\n| | 15:23 | 72:23 | Renminbi
(1) | 36:7;52:12 | :
6:16,23;61:14,16 |\n| | raised (2) | record
(6) | 59:23 | responsible
(7) | sale (9) |\n| | 14:1;102:6 | 2:5;3:4,7;29:25; | repeat
(1) | 8:22;31: 19;35: 18, | 15:2;44:3;75:24, |\n| | ralher
(2) | 74:7;95:25 | 47:1 | 23,25;36:8;58:11 | 24;76:7;86: 19,22; |\n| | 35:4,12 | records
(2) | repeated
(1) | responsive
(1) | 87:8; 104: 13 |\n| | reach (3) | 88:4;106:13 | 8:16 | 51:6 | sales (2) |\n| | 4:2; 19:8; 102:24 | redacted
(1) | reporter
(2) | rest (1) | I 57: 18;105:4 |\n| | read (27) | 20:19 | 99:21,22 | 101:25 | same (7) |\n| | 13:8,12,18; 15:1,5; | RE-D1RECT
(3) | represent
(2) | result
(1) | 5:7;6:23; 17:25; |\n| | 19:7,10;21 :7,16,18, | 55: 16;74:24;84:22 | 75:6;103:6 | 61:14 | 35: 15;43:24;73: 18; |\n| | 21;22:1;26:11,21; | reference
(5) | representation
(2) | reveal (1) | 103:3 |\n| | 30:5;31 :6, 12;34:4, | 4:22;53:7;84:3,14, | 44:25;45:5 | 109:4 | Sarnoff
(24) |\n| | 20;38: 12;53: 14,19; | 16 | representative
(1) | review (4) | I 2:15,15;56:15; |\n| | 69:2,19;72: 17,19; | refresh
(1) | 10:22 | 42:21;53:14,16; | 59:2;60:24;61 :4; |\n| | 89:8 | 66:13 | representatives
(3) | 58:19 | I 66: 12;69: 14;70:3, 10; |\n| | reading
(6) | refreshed
(1) | 7:7;65:25;66:20 | reviewed
(3) | 71:21;72:1,11,14,20, |\n| | 34:5,8;41:10; | 21: 1 | represented
(1) | 7: 19;79: 18;90: 12 | 22;74: 10,23;78: 15; |\n| | 47: 12;89: 14;97:4 | refuse (1) | 7:9 | reviewing
(2) | 84:23;85:3;92:
18; |\n| | readings
(2) | 32:10 | representing
(1) | 3:15;58:12 | 108:5,14 |\n| | 12:25;13:6 | refused
(3) | 70:5 | right
(82) | sat (I) |\n| | real (3) | 11:17;13:11;32:6 | request
(6) | 3: 10;6:2; 17:19,25; | I
62:13 |\n| | 13:14;16:8;47:6 | regarding
(5) | 10:8;64:3,24;65:3, | 18:16,19,22; 19:1,4, | satisfy (1) |\n| | realized
(1) | 78: 1,2; 103:5,15; | 9;66:18 | 17;20: 1,4,24;21 :3,7, | I 98:7 |\n| | 101:20 | 107:18 | requested
(5) | 9,10,24;22: 1,5,7,22, | save (1) |\n| | really (10) | registered
(1) | 28:2;32: 12;33:6, | 25;23:4,10,18;25:
15, | I 89:5 |\n| | 9: 16;13:16;25:9; | 88:12 | 18;100:9 | 23;26:4,25;27:11,12, | saw (11) |\n| | 36: 13;42:21,25; | regurgitation
(2) | requests
(3) | 19;28:7;29: 16;30: 15; | 7: 12;13:10;21 :23; |\n| | 47: 16;87:20,23; | 13:23;46:1 | 66:1,7,10 | 31: 10,22;32:7;33:2,4, | 22: 11;28:6,8;41: I; |\n| | 95:12 | re-introduction
(1) | required
(4) | 10,14;34: 13,16;36:7, | 46:20,24;59:20;69:4 |\n| | reason
(3) | 16:5 | 5:5;58:21 ;76: 17; | 17,21 ;37:5,16,19,22, | saying (9) |\n| | 10:22;48:21 ;98:6 | reiteration
(1) | 80:24 | 25;40: 16,19,24;41:4, | 11:23;13:13;21:9; |\n| | reasons
(4) | 16:4 | requires
(3) | 19;42:23;46: 17,21; | 26:3;37: 1;47: 10; |\n| | 6:23;49:25;63:7; | (I)
reject | 3:24;4:25;75:23 | 47:20;48: 16;55:7; | 50: 18,22; I09:20 |\n| | 103:10 | 88: 13 | re-registered
(1) | 62: 17;69:6;76: 13; | school (2) |\n| | re-boa rd (1) | related
(1) | 88:8 | 79:25;84: 18;90:24; | I
49:12;50:2 |\n| | 65:17 | 108:5 | reserve
(1) | 91 :21;92: 12;93:3,6; | scoping
(1) |\n| | recall (24) | released
(4) | 74:23 | 94:15;98:5;99:7,11; | I 10:11 |\n| | 29:22,23;30:3,11
; | 44:21 ;45: 1,6,11 | residence
(9) | 100:2,17; 103: 17; | search
(1) |\n| | 32:3;34: 1,10,25; | relevance
(12) | 101:2,18,21; | 104: 11 | I 10:7 |\n| | 38: 17;40:7;42:23; | 24: 13;43:20,24; | 104: 14;107:9,12,16, | role (3) | Searles
(40) |\n| | 59:9,17;60: 16;61:16, | 46:4,8;60:23 ;62:8, | 19;108:13 | 52:11;57:11,12 | 2:19,19;23:25; |\n| | 22;62:21 ;63:21,23; | 10;68: 12;94:9,13,24 | resides
(1) | Roscalitar
(1) | 26:8,11 ;27: 13;28:25; |\n| | 64: 13,14;66:2, 18; | relevant
(9) | 93:10 | 41:2 | 32:9,12,25;41 :8,17; |\n| | 68:6 | 11:8;12:21;24:24; | resolved
(2) | roughly
(2) | 43: 17,24;44: 14,23; |\n| | receive (2) | 25: 1;60:6;63: 12,13; | 38:3;42:25 | 57: 17;63:23 | 45:4;47:23;48:
1; |\n| | 85:10,11 | 71:19;95:12 | resolving
(1) | rule (2) | 53:5;54:5;55:2,13; |\n| | received
(11) | relied (2) | 16:1 | 24:23 ;92: I0 | 89: 16,25;90:3;91 :2, |\n| | 6:4;20: 14;49: 15; | 5:19;7:22 | respect
(7) | ruled
(1) | 10,14,18,23;92:22; |\n| | 64:25;72:3,12;78: 14; | relief (2) | 24:4;43:25;71 :9; | 26:10 | 94:7,13;95: 18,24; |\n| | 79:3,6,12;80:6 | 109:13,15 | 73: I;74:
15;100:7,25 | rules (2) | 96: 13,17,24;97:6 |\n| | recently
(2) | remarks
(2) | respectfully
(1) | 68: 19;94:6 | seat (2) |\n| | | | | | I |\n\nMin-U-Script@ (11) quite - seat\n\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v.
Kwok Ho Wan | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 123 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------|\n| | | of 126 | | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | | | | April 26, 2019 |\n| 56: 13;98:4 | sets (2) | 67:21,24;68:4,16,18, | 64: 16,21,24;65:4,6, | I
state (4) |\n| | | | | |\n| seated (I) | 16:6;46:2 | 19;69:5;75:24;78:6 | 12;66:4,21,24,24; | 117:4;56:9;97:25; |\n| 17:7 | seven (4) | significant
(4) | 67:8;82:4,18;83:5; | 98:13 |\n| second (16) | 9:4; 18:6,7;48: 14 | 8:16;9:22;10:11; | 107:16 | stated
(I) |\n| 4: 14,18;5:2;30: 18, | several
(2) | 21:6 | son's
(I) | I 68:7 |\n| 24,25;48:2;50:3,4; | 3:1;75:10 | significantly
(I) | 7:1 | statement
(6) |\n| 53: 17;78: 17;83:23; | shaking
(I) | | Sorry
(28) | |\n| | | 99:6 | | I 26:18,19;30:14; |\n| 96:24;104:18; | 31:12 | signing
(I) | 20:10,11;36:15,18, | 40: 18;46: 13;50: 18 |\n| 109:13,16 | shell (2) | 67:19 | 19;39:13;40:23;51 :5, | statements
(3) |\n| Secrecy (I) | 8:21;10:19 | similar
(I) | 8,8,8,8;52:9;54:25; | I 26:24;35: 15;37:8 |\n| 7:2 | Sherry
(4) | 6:23 | 55: 1,1;66:8;68: 13; | States
(3) |\n| secreted
(I) | 57:3;81:19,22; | similarly
(I) | 71: 14;77:7;85: 1,2; | I 14:16;60:11,18 |\n| 98:12 | 109:24 | | | |\n| | | 6:21 | 91 :2;93:8;94: 18; | status
(I) |\n| sections (2) | Sherry-Netherland
(69) | simple (2) | 98:23; 100: 12;101:6 | I 99:1 |\n| 96:4,9 | 6:6,8,15;7:8,11,12, | 11:2;43:3 | sort (2) | step (2) |\n| secure
(I) | 17,21;8:5,7,11,19; | single (I) | 59:12;108:7 | I 48: I;55:22 |\n| 62:3 | 15:3;20:20;56:21; | 28:6 | sought
(3) | still (6) |\n| security
(II) | 57:19,21;58:11;59:7; | Sister
(2) | 63: 19;64:6;86:3 | |\n| | | | | I 25:24;29:7;30:20; |\n| 6:16;61:17,19; | 60:9,13,17,25;61 :3,6, | 50:12,16 | sound
(2) | 47: 15;48: 17;I03:7 |\n| 63: 19,24;64:7;67: 17, | 13;63:10;64:2,5; | sister-in-law
(2) | 13:5;15:15 | stipulate
(4) |\n| 18;80:24;81: 1,3 | 65:8,11 ;67:21 ;68:3, | 48: 16,20 | sounds
(I) | I 12:15;44:11,14,15 |\n| seeing (2) | 20;70: 19;71: 18;72:3, | sit (3) | 24:12 | stipulated
(8) |\n| 9:20;49:23 | 4,16,24;76:6;78:
10; | 30:21 ;38:8;39:6 | speak
(8) | I 3:5,18;12:14,18,21, |\n| seeking
(3) | 79:22;82:9;85: 10, 16, | situated
(I) | | |\n| | | | 47:7,24;53:
19,23; | 22;46:6;70: 16 |\n| 14:17;108:10; | 24,25;86:5,21 ;87: 16; | 6:22 | 60 :6;75:20;83 :8;89:3 | stipulating
(I) |\n| 109:9 | 88: I,4,9, 13, 16,19; | situation
(3) | speaking
(3) | I 46:2 |\n| seemed (I) | 90:9;93:3;98:
15, 16, | 31:24;39:5;50:5 | 49: 1;53: 18;54: 16 | stipulation
(2) |\n| 83:11 | 17;I01:2,5,9;104:
16, | situations
(I) | speaks
(3) | I 24:2;45:1 |\n| seems (I) | | | | |\n| | 23;106:5,13 | 65:20 | 72: 13;82:25;83: 1 | stock (3) |\n| 83:14 | Sherry-Netherland's
(I) | six (3) | spent(l) | I 88:1,7,12 |\n| select (2) | 72:23 | 48: 17;49: 11;50:23 | 47: 11 | stop (I) |\n| 89: 19;91:11 | Sherry's
(I) | size (I) | spoke (I) | I 50: II |\n| selection
(I) | 88:21 | 62:3 | 54:2 | stopped
(3) |\n| | | | | |\n| 94:1 | ship{l) | skip (I) | spoken
(3) | I 49: 13,22,23 |\n| sell (12) | 57:15 | 59:3 | 83:5,10;89:17 | straight
(I) |\n| 5:25;11:24;14:3; | shock (I) | slide (2) | Spring
(13) | I 24:25 |\n| 18:25; 19:17;85: 12; | 88:5 | 4:4;28:13 | 23:5;27:3;42:7; | strategy
(I) |\n| 87:4;98: 18;104: 15; | short
(4) | Sloane (13) | | |\n| | | | 47:2;51: 16,19,21 ,23; | I 38:3 |\n| 106:16;107:18; | 3: 16;9:3;63: 16; | 19:1,4,6,8, 12,16, | 52:1,1,11,22;53:24 | Street
(2) |\n| 108:12 | 102:22 | 25;21 :8;22:8, 11,20, | squabble
(I) | I 17:6;56:12 |\n| selling (2) | shortly
(2) | 23;64:14 | 96:19 | stronger
(I) |\n| 19:4;58:16 | 64:6;70:22 | small (I) | stage (I) | I 9:22 |\n| sells (I) | show (18) | 18:8 | 103:2 | structu
re (4) |\n| 87:5 | 8:14,16,18,20; | sold (I) | stand
(5) | |\n| | | | | I 6:18;61:6,10;86:12 |\n| send (2) | 9: 15;13: 14;31:5,9, | 55:5 | 14:9;25:4;32:23; | Stuart
(I) |\n| 19:8,11 | 10;42:11,22;47:13; | sale (2) | 55:24;89: I | I 2:15 |\n| sense (3) | 60:9;61: 12;66: 12; | 105:14,19 | standard
(9) | studied
(I) |\n| 96:8;97: I;99: I | 71 :21;74:3;90: 16 | solved (I) | 3: 17;4:5,21,24,25; | I 50:3 |\n| sensitive
(I) | showed
(3) | 108:21 | 5:24;7:3; 11:8;65: 19 | |\n| | | | | stuff{l) |\n| 21:5 | 6:8;8:1;31:11 | somebody
(IO) | standards
(4) | I 47:10 |\n| sent (3) | showing
(4) | 13:15;81: 13;84:8; | 4:24;102:11;103:2, | subject
(7) |\n| 20: 14;59:24;69:5 | 6:20;43: 17;60: 17, | 87:25;88:11,12,13; | 3 | 14: 18,20;24:2; |\n| separate
(3) | 18 | 104: 15;105:8; 109: 17 | standing
(I) | 68:11;71:18,19; |\n| 36:20,25;37:2 | shui (I) | somehow
(I) | 51:2 | 100:4 |\n| | | | | |\n| sequence
(I) | 63:7 | 30:23 | stare
(I) | submit(3) |\n| 92:6 | side (I) | someone
(7) | 36:16 | I 6:21;58:23;89:5 |\n| serious
(2) | 90:1 | 8:9;20: 19,23;64:9; | start
(13) | submitted
(16) |\n| 4: 17;26: 1 | sign (2) | 82:3;83:3;84:3 | 3: 11,14;28:2;48:4, | |\n| served (2) | | | | 5: 17;13:24; 15:2; |\n| | 54:13;61:23 | sometimes
(2) | 8;49:5;51 :25;52:2, | 23:2;25: 14,22;41 :20; |\n| 69:1;76:11 | signature
(I) | 19:15;36:15 | 22;76:20;89: 13;99:5; | 43:4;53: 15,25;60:2; |\n| set (7) | 78:7 | son (24) | 102:12 | 84: 13, 16;90: 11; |\n| | signed
(12) | 48: 14,19;49:9, 10, | started
(3) | 101:4,8 |\n| | | | | |\n| 2:7,8; 10:20,24;
65:3;85: 18;102:7 | 15:4;42:2;54: 10; | 13,21,23;50:23;51: 1; | 28:9;48:6;91:
18 | ~ubmitting
(2) |\n\n----------\n\nMill-U-Script@ I\n\n(12) seated - submitting\n\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 124
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | 26, 2019
April |\n| | | | | |\n| 53:9;65:22 | (3)
swearing | 17:2;28:22;32:22; | 103:14;107:3 | 3:6;6:25; 10: 10; |\n| suborn
(I) | 26:4;43:5,7 | 38:20;52:25;56:8; | today's
(I) | 31:12
I |\n| 5:16 | switching
(I) | 74:3;97:20 | 13:22 | true (5) |\n| subpoena
(I) | 55:2 | testifies (I) | together
(7) | I 76:15;97:24;101:2, |\n| 14:6 | (6)
swore | 15:16 | 18:9;50:3;57: 14; | 9,13
I |\n| subpoenaed
(2) | 5: 19;28: 16;41:21; | testify (8) | 58:20,22,22;79:
10 | trust
(7) |\n| 73:16,17 | 43: II ;44: 11;46: 10 | 5:11;6:7,10,24;7:6, | told (25) | I 6:25;64: 17,19,24; |\n| subsequent
(I) | (12)
sworn | 16;73:15;95:7 | 2:6;7: 13;8:5,6; | 65:6;66:24;81: 17 |\n| 70:15 | 17: 1,9;25:6;26: 18, | (2)
testifying | 10:6;22:11,13,23; | trustee
(2) |\n| subsequently
(I) | 19;27: 10;28: 19;35:6; | 32:23;62:7 | 33:4,5;36:5;39:4,19, | I 58:8,9 |\n| 59:25 | 37:8;56:7;97: 18,19 | (41)
testimony | 21,22,23;40: 1,4; | truth
(5) |\n| succeed (I) | | 5: 14;8:2,5;9:4,7,9, | 49:20;50:4,12,19; | I 5:22;23:24;73:23; |\n| 12:17 | T | 9; 13:4; 16:18;25:6,7; | 65: 12;72: 16;82:9 | 95: 12;97:23 |\n| success (I) | | 26: 12,13;28:21 ;29:I; | Tony (1) | try (13) |\n| 3:19 | table (3) | 32:17;37:11,12; | 84:17 | 10:7;27:5;31: 14; |\n| sue (I) | 21 :2;24:23;47: 10 | 54: 14;62: 10;66: 13, | took (4) | 33:6;43:3;46: 14; |\n| 73:8 | Taiwan
(2) | 15;71: 17;73: 10,21, | 2:8;12:1;51:22; | 47:7,24;53:22;56: 17; |\n| sufficient
(2) | ,
84:6,7 | 25;74:6,9;79:9; | 73:1 | 73: 12;99:2,3 |\n| 5:1;100:15 | | | | |\n| (2)
suggested | tale (1) | 86:25;90: 15,18,25; | top (3) | trying
(II) |\n| | 95:10 | 93: I;94:9,20;95:4; | 6: 11;21: 15;104:21 | 3: 15;10: 13;24:22; |\n| 100:21;108:21 | talk (5) | 96:4; 101:13;105:6,7 | topics (3) | 27:8;36:18;47:11,18; |\n| summarize
(I) | 7:4;10:14;13:11; | theirs
(2) | 10:18; 11:2;55:2 | 50:9;67: II ;74: 19; |\n| 73:25 | 18:24;38:5 | 45:10,11 | Tor (I) | 109:22 |\n| summarized
(I) | talked
(3) | therefore
(3) | 97:15 | Tsang
(I) |\n| 74: 11 | 5:8;11:4,5 | 93:16;101:12; | T-O-R
(I) | j
82:22 |\n| summarizing
(2) | (7)
talking | 108:6 | 97:15 | urn (3) |\n| 74:6;94:19 | 27:21 ;43:2;49: 13, | (6)
third | total (2) | I 40:10;89:3;105:17 |\n| sun (I) | 22,23;50:11;53:22 | 8:11;13:20;45:25; | 9:4; 18:7 | turned
(I) |\n| 107:3 | talks (I) | 50:9;53: 17;86:20 | totally
(2) | I 79:12 |\n| super
(6) | 24:17 | (4)
though | 18:9;30:23 | twice (2) |\n| 30: 19;31:3,7,22; | tape (12) | 32:7;35:6;45: 15; | (3)
touch | I 16:6,21 |\n| 36:16;47:13 | 10:9,17;11:3,19; | 86:21 | 67:5;83:3,3 | twist (I) |\n| supplied
(I) | 12:9;28:5;49: 17; | (8)
thought | (2)
track | I 24:22 |\n| 78:24 | 91: 1;94: 16,22;95: 1, | 4:6,11;12:4,7; | 51: 10;52:23 | two (30) |\n| support
(6) | 14 | 20: 18;62: 18;91:3; | transactions
(1) | 4: 15,23;5:22,25; |\n| 4:5,20;23:7;25: 14; | task (1) | 108:20 | 57:17 | 6: 10;7: 19,24; I0: 19, |\n| 40: 18;84:4 | 12:1 | thousands
(1) | transcript
(6) | 21 ;13:24; 16:6;22: 18; |\n| (2)
supposed | team (I) | 42:12 | 12:24; 13:3;34:4; | 28:24;36:20,25;37: I, |\n| 8:25;52: 18 | | (3) | | |\n| | 52:12 | threaten | 89:6,8;92:21 | 12;42: 11;43: I;46:2; |\n| supposedly
(I) | technical
(1) | 42: 16;49: 18;50:7 | transcripts
(3) | 49:25;53:3;78: 18,23; |\n| 11:24 | 31:6 | threatened
(1) | 12:23,23;13:6 | 84:24;90: 19;95: 18; |\n| Supreme
(I) | teed (1) | 48:21 | transfer
(21) | 99: 15;I00: 14;104:20 |\n| 25:23 | 9:3 | three
(4) | 6:25;7:2;64: 15,20, | type (4) |\n| Sure (II) | telephonic
(I) | 3:18;43:1;67:19; | 24;65:2,3,22;66:23; | I 58:24;59: 17;63:9,9 |\n| 3:8;5:25;31: 17; | 83:25 | 108: 11 | 85:24;86:3,19;87:8, | typical
(4) |\n| 33:24;35:3,20;52:17, | telling (2) | throughout
(I) | 12;98: 19;101 :20; | I 59:12;63:10,14; |\n| 17;57: 15;62: 10; | 5:22;99:8 | 9:19 | 105:4,23;106:3; | 74:15 |\n| 99:17 | ten (1) | timeline
(1) | 108:13;109:1 | typing
(1) |\n| surprised
(I) | 39:6 | 62:22 | transferred
(8) | I 63:9 |\n| 109:11 | (3)
tenant | times (3) | 85: 14;86: 17;87: 16; | |\n| suspended
(I) | 61 :6,9;80: 15 | 3:1;11:16;50:5 | 88:8,12;95:8;98: 15; | U |\n| 108:7 | (2)
tenure | timing (3) | 104:22 | I |\n| suspension
(1) | 57:19;61:5 | 44:3;45: 18;63:9 | transferring
(3) | t
Ullman
(18) |\n| 108:16 | (2)
term | title (6) | 64: 10;82:3; 106:23 | 6:5,5, I0, 14,24;7:4, |\n| sustain
(I) | 53: 1;54:22 | 56:23;64: 10;66:24; | transfers
(2) | 6;56:11,16;74:22; |\n| 14:10 | (6)
terminated | 105:24;106:3,9 | 104:18;105:3 | 75:3,7,22;76: 15; |\n| sustained
(10) | 41 :23;43:6,10,11; | today (25) | transit
(I) | |\n| 60:8;67: 14;70:9,9, | | | | 77:22;78: 16;85: I; |\n| | 44:12;46:12 | 3: 15;4:9, 19;5:5,10, | 17: 12 | 87:25 |\n| 9;73:2,3;74:8,17,21 | terms
(2) | 12,21;11:14;12:11; | (3)
translate | ultimate
(5) |\n| swear (2) | 16:15;58:18 | 13:8,25;14:6; 16:3,7; | 15:13;19:10,11 | 174:1;85:15;86:14; |\n| 27: 17;97:22 | terrible
(I) | 24: 16;25:7;44:3; | (2)
translator | 102:15;103:3 |\n| sweared
(I) | II: 13 | 71:20;73: 12,23;94:1; | 5: 14;32:7 | ultimately
(I) |\n| 36:9 | (8)
testified | 98:25; 100:23; | (4)
tried | I 33:2'. |\n\n--------\n\n(13) suborn - ultimately\n\n| | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 404-17
Filed 05/20/22 | | Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 | Page 125
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | I |\n| | unavailable
(2) | 29:8;50:10 | 101:23;103:9 | 16;27: 16;29:5,7, 12, | year (3) |\n| | 93:13;96:7 | Vice (3) | WeChat
(1) | 14;32: 12,20,23;39:3; | I 42:3;46:11;63:22 |\n| | unconditionally
(1) | 6:6;56:23;78:8 | 49:23 | 43: 15;51 :5,8;54:5,6, | years (11) |\n| | 8:23 | video (22) | weeks (1) | 8;55: 1,23,24,25;56:3, | 15:8,8;18:21; |\n| | under
(7) | 7: 17;9: 15; 10:9, 17; | 7:19 | 11;66:9,11,12;67:3; | 49:11,12;50:23;57:5, |\n| | 3:23,24;5:24;9:6; | 11:3,19;12:9;28:5; | Wei (5) | 68:23;69: 16;70: 14, | 10;59: I;62: 18;75: 10 |\n| | 104:11;107:9;108:14 | 49:24;50: 17,21 ,22, | 105:6,8,8,9; 107: 10 | 22,25;71 :2,4,24; | York (29) |\n| | underlying
(1) | 25;89:4,22;90:
16; | W-E-I
(1) | 75: 15;77:17,21 ;86: I, | 6: II ;9: 18;17:6,6; |\n| | 53:10 | 91: I;94: 16,22;95: 1, | 107:10 | 6,9;87: 13,17;88:24, | 18:19;23:5;27:3; |\n| | understands
(I) | 14,20 | Welcome
(1) | 25;89: 1,3;93: 14; | 34: 15,18, 18,23;49:5, |\n| | 15:9 | view (4) | 2:23 | 95:7,15;96:7;97:8, | 8;51:12,17,19,21,23; |\n| | understood
(8) | 67:10,13;74:18; | weren't
(4) | 24;98:2 | 52: 1,2;56: 12, 12; |\n| | 10:14;15:18;19:13;
25: 17,19,25;54: 10; | 99:4 | 26:3;84: 14;93:24; | witnesses
(2) | 59: 1;86: 12,14;87:3; |\n| | 85:9 | violate
(1) | 94:11 | 3:16;5:11 | 106:7,12,23 |\n| | unfortunately
(1) | 68:10
violation
(2) | West (1) | witness's
(1) | younger
(2) |\n| | | | 56: 11 | 86:24 | 50:12,19
I |\n| | 75:21 | 70:12,19 | What's
(4) | woman
(1) | YouTube
(2) |\n| | Uniqueness
(1)
60:24 | Virgin
(1) | 17:23;46:2;58:21 ; | 35:10 | I 11:21,22 |\n| | unit (I) | 106:8
voice (8) | 77:22
WhatsApp
(1) | Wong (1)
20:3 | Yvette (4) |\n| | 87:15 | 11:23;12:3;13:15, | 49:23 | word
(2) | 116:23;20:3;21:15, |\n| | United (4) | 16;17:3;49: 17;50:21; | whenever
(2) | | 18 |\n| | 14:16;60:11,18; | 56:10 | 108:24,25 | 8:12;47:15
words
(1) | Yvetteyue423
(I) |\n| | 84:17 | voluntarily
(1) | Whereupon
(23) | | I
20:4 |\n| | university
(1) | 14:8 | 3: 12;17:15;19:20, | 51: I | Z |\n| | 48:8 | volunteer
(1) | 22;23:13,15;28:11; | work
(10)
17:19,20; 18:3, II, | I |\n| | Unless (2) | 73:15 | 40: 12;43: 14,22; | 18;48:24;51: 13,14, | .1 |\n| | 62:6;109:9 | voted (4) | 55:23;56: 1,5;69:9, 15, | 25;52:22 | Zero (1) |\n| | unprecedented
(1) | 79:20,24;80:8,15 | 24;71 :23;77: 14,20; | worked
(1) | I 5:20
Zhang
(5) |\n| | 6:15 | vouched
(1) | 83: 19;88:25;97: 17; | 18:15 | I 105:6,8,8,9; 107: 10 |\n| | up (23) | 84:10 | 99:25 | working
(5) | |\n| | 2:7,8;5:9;6:5;9:3; | | whole (11) | 48:4,6,8;49:5; | 1 |\n| | 10:20,24; 14:16,16; | W | 6: I; 13:12;17:20; | 51: 12 | I |\n| | 18:25;24: 16;47:25; | | 18:12;29: 10;43: 1; | works
(1) | I
1 (3) |\n| | 51:2;65:3,22;73:5; | wait (1) | 48: 14;50:7;71: 13; | 10:1 | I 76:21,23,24 |\n| | 77:3;84:24;85: 18; | 103:24 | 89: 11;90:6 | world
(2) | 1.5 (1) |\n| | 89:8;93:2;94:7;95: 10 | walk (I) | Whose (1) | 6:2;48:25 | I 49:10 |\n| | upon (1) | 90:15 | 36:2 | Worldwide
(1) | 1:00 (1) |\n| | 15:8 | Wan (4) | willing (2) | 49:4 | I
103:20 |\n| | use (3) | 2:3; 17:24;59:4; | 50: 18,22 | worth
(1) | 10 (1) |\n| | 25:7;29:21 ;82:21 | 98:2 | win (1) | 24:14 | I 18:21 |\n| | used (12) | W-A-N (1) | 73:13 | wrap
(1) | 100 (5) |\n| | 8: 12;9:7;25: 19; | 98:3 | wishes (1) | 73:5 | 135:17,18;36:8; |\n| | 50:25;53:2;61 :6,9; | Wang
(21) | 107:25 | write
(2) | 45:4;48: 13 |\n| | 81:4;85:5,6,6;96:4 | 5: 13, 13,21; 16:23; | withdraw
(1) | 19:7,10 | 10019 (1) |\n| | useful (1)
• | 17:5,19; 19:16,25; | 64:6 | writing
(2) | I 56:12 |\n| | 4:6 | 23: 18;25: 12;26:23; | withdrawal
(1) | 71:12,15 | 101 (1) |\n| | using (2) | 27: 10;28:22;29: 16; | 108:16 | written
(2) | I 26:22 |\n| | 6:10;24:7 | 30:3;33: 1;40: 16; | within
(2) | 72:2;104:12 | 102 (I) |\n| | usually (1) | 41 :20;46:20;47:24; | 53:24;63:22 | wrong
(I) | I 34:20 |\n| | 35:20 | 72:25 | without
(21) | 74:2 | |\n| | | Wang's
(2) | 9:2;11:17;28:13; | wrongdoing
(1) | r-minute
(I)
92:15 |\n| | V | 17:12;46:10 | 42: I;47: 10;48:21; | 5:3 | |\n| | | wants
(I) | 85:24;86:4;95:9; | | jl
(I)
38:13 |\n| | various
(3) | 105: 10 | 97:1;98:15,19; | X | |\n| | 4:2; 12:23;89:7 | waste (4) | 103: 13;106: 17,24; | | j2 (I)
59:1 |\n| | veil (14) | 4:7;31: 15;98:5; | 107:6,11,14,16; | X-ed (I) | |\n| | | | | | r51
(1) |\n| | 4: 14,15,24;5:7,7,9; | 99:10 | | | |\n| | 100:8,16,18,21; | wasting
(4) | 108:9,23 | 95:3 | 103:21 |\n| | 102:20,25; 103: 12,15 | 44: 13,22;99: 12, 13 | witness (73) | | 13 (I) |\n| | versus
(I) | way (8) | 4:12,13,13,13;
14:9; 16:23; 17:5,8,9, | y | 34:
8
1 |\n| | 2:2 | 15:24;22: 12;29: 13; | 16;19:21;23: 14;25:3, | | J5 (I) |\n| | via (2) | 31 :9;50:20;95:23; | 3,4,5,5,11 ;26:8, 16, | Van (1)
17:5 | 32:19
1
50(I)
1 |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (14) unavailable - 150\n\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v.
Kwok Ho Wan | Doc 404-17 | Filed 05/20/22
Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18
of 126 | Page 126
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
April
26, 2019 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 17:6 | | | |\n| 16 (3) | 5 | | |\n| 49:14,24;50:11 | | | |\n| 17 (2) | 57th (2) | | |\n| 9:24;19:24 | 17:6;56: 11 | | |\n| 19 (I)
34:9 | 6 | | |\n| | | | |\n| 2 | 60 (I) | | |\n| 2 (I) | 57:20 | | |\n| 41:2 | 62012 (I) | | |\n| 2.3 (I) | 3:17
62013 (3) | | |\n| 64:1 | 3:23,24;24: 17 | | |\n| 2:00 (I) | 64 (I) | | |\n| 99:23
2009 (3) | 92:1 | | |\n| 18:21;48:6;51: 13 | 65 (I)
92:1 | | |\n| 2010 (I) | 652077 (I) | | |\n| 57:6
2015 (10) | 2:1 | | |\n| 41 :4,22;43:6;49:8; | 66 (I) | | |\n| 51:11,14;58:4;59:10, | 92:1
67 (2) | | |\n| 11;75:18 | 21 :7;92: 1 | | |\n| 2016 (I) | 6th (2) | | |\n| 20:1
2017 (7) | 63:4,5 | | |\n| 2:2;41 :24;43:7; | 7 | | |\n| 49: 14,22;71:2,3 | | | |\n| 2018 (3) | 7 (I) | | |\n| 18:18;51:22;78:21
21 (I) | 34:20 | | |\n| 41:4 | 77 (I)
34:8 | | |\n| 22D (I) | 78 (2) | | |\n| 17:6 | 29: 19;31 :25 | | |\n| 23rd (2)
49:8;51:14 | 781 (I) | | |\n| 29 (I) | 98:3 | | |\n| 78:21 | 8 | | |\n| 3 | | | |\n| | 81 (2) | | |\n| 3 (I) | 38: 12;39:25
8G (I) | | |\n| 63:23 | 56:12 | | |\n| 3117a2 (I)
9:6 | | | |\n| 33 (3) | 9 | | |\n| 69:8,12,21 | 9 (2) | | |\n| 34 (2) | 34:21;38:13 | | |\n| 23: 17;53:7
340 (I) | | | |\n| 56:11 | | | |\n| 35 (2) | | | |\n| 71:22;72:1 | | | |\n| 4 | | | |\n| | | | |\n| 40 (I) | | | |\n| 57:10 | | | |\n| 43 (2)
43: 19;46:24 | | | |\n| 45 (I) | | | |\n| 91:8 | | | |\n\n. \\_.\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (15)16-9","body_zh":"PAX 证据 17\n\n2019 年 4 月 26 日听证会记录，PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵），案号 652077/2017（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）），Dkt. 331\n\n纽约州最高法院纽约县——民事审判庭——第 61 部\n-------------------------------------------------------x\nPACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA（太平洋联盟亚洲），\n原告，\n诉\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n被告。\n--------------------------------------------~----------X\n案号 652077-2017\n60 Centre Street\nNew York, New York\n2019 年 4 月 26 日\n\n审理法官：\n\n尊敬的 BARRY R. OSTRAGER（巴里·R·奥斯特拉格）法官\n\n出庭律师：\n\nO'MELVENY & MYERS LLP（奥美律师事务所）\n原告代理律师\n7 Times Square\nNew York, New York 10036\n代理律师：EDWARD MOSS（爱德华·莫斯），ESQ.\nSTUART SARNOFF（斯图尔特·萨尔诺夫），ESQ.\nGARO HOPLAMAZIAN（加罗·霍普拉马齐安），ESQ.\n\nHODGSON RUSS（霍奇森·拉斯律师事务所）\n被告代理律师\n605 Third Avenue, Suite 2300\nNew York, New York 10158\n代理律师：JILLIAN MARIE SEARLES（吉莉安·玛丽·瑟尔斯），ESQ.\nMARK A. HARMON（马克·A·哈蒙），ESQ.\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）\n官方法庭记录员\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号 652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nNYSCEF 收件：05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 2 页，共 126 页\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号 652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nNYSCEF 收件：05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 3 页，共 126 页\n\n诉讼程序\n\n书记员：这是 2017 年案号 652077 的案件，即 PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）案。律师，请为记录说明你们的出庭身份。\n\n法庭：好的。此前有人告诉我，你们今天上午需要一个小时进行布置，但幸好你们几乎没有花时间就布置好了，所以我们开始吧。\n\n莫斯先生：是，法官阁下。谢谢。早上好。\n\n书记员：律师，请说明你们的出庭身份。\n\n莫斯先生：法官阁下，早上好。我是来自 O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）的 Edward Moss（爱德华·莫斯），代理原告。\n\n萨尔诺夫先生：我是来自 O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）的 Stuart Sarnoff（斯图尔特·萨尔诺夫），代理原告。\n\n霍普拉马齐安先生：我是来自 O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）的 Garo Hoplamazian（加罗·霍普拉马齐安），代理原告。\n\n瑟尔斯女士：我是 Hodgson Russ（霍奇森·拉斯律师事务所）的 Jillian Searles（吉莉安·瑟尔斯），代理被告。\n\n哈蒙先生：法官阁下，早上好。我是 Hodgson Russ（霍奇森·拉斯律师事务所）的 Mark Harmon（马克·哈蒙）。\n\n法庭：欢迎。\n\n莫斯先生：谢谢，法官阁下。早上好。我知道，关于扣押的问题已被多次充分陈述，我也知道法官阁下对此熟悉，因此我将迅速陈述我的意见。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号 652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nNYSCEF 收件：05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 4 页，共 126 页\n\n诉讼程序\n\n法庭：让我们将双方当事人已经约定的所有事项记入记录，并将今天上午需要审理的问题记入记录。\n\n莫斯先生：当然。法官阁下，这实际上就在我的开场陈述中。\n\n法庭：好。\n\n莫斯先生：但我将从此处开始。\n\n（此时，向法庭展示了一份证据。）\n\n莫斯先生：法官阁下，我准备先回顾我们今天正在审理的事项，并简要概述您将听取证言的四名证人。第一个问题是扣押标准，即 6201(2)。双方当事人已约定前三项要件：诉因；胜诉可能性；以及向被告请求的金额超过所有已知反诉，因此我们在这里——关于扣押问题的第一个问题是，是否根据 6201(3) 存在扣押理由；而根据 6201(3)，我们必须证明，Kwok 先生意图欺诈债权人，或挫败本案中可能作出的判决，因而在其各种试图使该公寓脱离我方可及范围的行为中采取了行动，而此类行为有很多。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号 652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nNYSCEF 收件：05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 5 页，共 126 页\n\n诉讼程序\n\n下一张幻灯片列出了支持我方证据为何符合该意图法律标准的判例。我认为让您手边备有此项内容会很有用，但我不会在此浪费时间。\n\n这里列有我方证据，以及我们今天将要证明的证据。这是我们在书面陈述中重点列举的证据，并且我们将予以证明。我现在不会逐一说明，但我认为，除按证人分类外，按问题分类向您列出会有所帮助。我将按证人逐一说明。\n\n我们来此要证明的第二个问题是揭开公司面纱。揭开公司面纱有两个要件：完全支配和控制，以及滥用公司形式。我认为第一个要件并无实质争议；而第二个要件，即意图问题，将是我们今天举证的重点。\n\n以下判例支持我方证据为何符合该标准。同样，这只是供您参考，法官阁下，以便您手边备有这些判例。\n\n我只想就这两个标准，即揭开公司面纱标准和扣押标准，暂停说明一点。二者均不要求我们证明欺诈。就第一个标准而言，意图挫败判决即已足够。就第二个标准而言，判例表明，对我方当事人而言，不公平、不当行为或不法行为已足够。为明确起见，法官阁下，我们今天将证明欺诈。我的意思是，我们并不被要求这样做。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号 652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nNYSCEF 收件：05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 6 页，共 126 页\n\n诉讼程序\n\n这是揭开公司面纱的证据，与我们在书面陈述中谈及的揭开公司面纱证据相同。这是我们今天将要证明的揭开公司面纱证据，现在我将简要说明四名证人及其今天将作出的证言。\n\n第一位将是 Wang 女士（王女士）。Wang 女士是 Kwok 先生的翻译和助理。她的证言将表明，为避免扣押，Kwok 先生甚至不惜教唆伪证。Wang 女士提交了一份宣誓书。这是 Kwok 先生反对我方先前扣押动议的主要证据。这就是他所依赖的内容，而她对自己绝无任何了解的事实作了宣誓陈述。毫无了解。我们今天将证明这一点。\n\nWang 女士还将确认，Kwok 先生在两个关键问题上没有说实话。第一，其对该公寓设定的质押，且请记住，根据 CPLR，权利负担是该标准的一部分。第二，出售该公寓的努力。我确信 Harmon 先生会说，这世界上还有什么比这更公开的呢；对吧？你把这套昂贵的公寓放到市场上出售。那么，如果他确实这样做了，他为什么否认收到过还价这一事实？\n\n下一位是 Ullman 先生（厄尔曼先生）。Ullman 先生是 Sherry-Netherland（谢里-内瑟兰酒店）的执行副总裁兼首席财务官。他将证明，在审批过程中，Kwok 先生向 Sherry-Netherland 表明其在美国没有资产，且没有以自己名义持有的资产。这在该酒店从未发生过。Ullman 先生还将证明，使用两家 LLC（有限责任公司），即一家外国 LLC 叠加一家纽约 LLC，来购买该楼内的一套公寓——这正是 Kwok 先生所称其所做之事——此前在该酒店也从未发生过；并且，正因如此，Ullman 先生将解释，Sherry-Netherland 采取了前所未有的保障措施，例如有史以来金额最高的保证金，因为他们基于该结构极为担心，如果 Kwok 先生未履行其每月义务，他们将不得不追着他跑遍全球，而他并未显示拥有任何资产。\n\n我们恭请法庭认定，我方处于类似境况。我们将在本案中获得判决，并且出于同样理由，我们需要采取类似的扣押保障措施。\n\nUllman 先生还将证明，Kwok 先生试图将该公寓转让给以其儿子名义设立的信托。Kwok 先生否认对此有任何记忆。保密和资产转移有助于我们符合该标准。既然 Kwok 先生否认，我们便请 Ullman 先生到庭就此作证，而且还有书面证据。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\n诉讼程序\n\n最后，Ullman 先生还将证明，Kwok 先生及其代表就质押一事向 Sherry-Netherland 作出的虚假陈述。他们向您表示，该公寓已被质押。他们遇到了大问题，因为这违反了他们与 Sherry-Netherland 签订的租赁协议。因此，当 Sherry-Netherland 看到他们的文件并说：“嘿，你们质押了该公寓”时，他们说：“不，不。我们从未向 Ostrager 法官作出过那样的陈述。您一定是误读了我们的文件。”这是虚假的。我们将予以证明。\n\n下一位是 Horvitz 先生（霍维茨先生）。Horvitz 先生将通过视频简要作证。他是 Sherry-Netherland 的首席执行官兼董事会主席。他住在 Cleveland（克利夫兰）。我们两周前在那里对其进行了庭前证言录取。他审阅了 Kwok 先生为促使该酒店批准其申请而向 Sherry-Netherland 提供的财务信息，并且 Horvitz 先生依赖该财务信息，建议董事会予以批准。该信息包括 Kwok 先生称其拥有的两家公司的财务资料。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号 652077/2017\nCase 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 9 页，共\n诉讼程序\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nNYSCEF 收件：05/08/2019\n\n法官阁下，如您将看到的那样，我们向 Horvitz 先生出示了 Kwok 先生的庭前证言，即仅限于公开可得的节录；其中 Kwok 先生否认在其曾告知 Sherry-Netherland 其拥有的那些实体中拥有任何所有权权益。他的证言直接与其告知 Sherry-Netherland 的内容相矛盾，而作为虚假陈述的受述人，Horvitz 先生将告诉您，Kwok 先生必定是在向某人作虚假陈述。他要么在庭前证言中说谎，要么欺诈了 Sherry-Netherland。不存在第三种可能。而且，法官阁下，实际上使用“欺诈”一词的是 Horvitz 先生，而不是我。\n\n最后，我们将请 Kwok 先生作证。我们将证明，Kwok 先生支配和控制 Genever（吉尼弗）实体。我们将证明，他为击败扣押动议，反复向法庭作出重大虚假陈述；我们将证明，他为诱使 Sherry-Netherland 允许其购买而向该酒店作出重大虚假陈述；并且我们将证明，购买该公寓的资金很可能来自一家傀儡公司，该公司负责偿还对我方当事人的债务，而该债务由 Kwok 先生无条件担保。该资金当然不是来自作为拟议购买方的 Genever。重要的是，法官阁下，我们是\n\n将证明，郭文贵先生不会且不能在本案中支付判决款，除非采取扣押措施。\n\n现在，我们已经准备好了几段简短视频，总计约七分钟，拟在开场陈述中播放，内容为郭文贵先生的证言记录。根据 CPLR 3117(a)(2)，我们有权这样做：“当事人的证言记录可由在作证时与其利益相对的任何一方为任何目的使用。”法官阁下，这是重要的证言，具有重要目的：郭文贵先生稍后将在此——他现在已经在这里——并且他会在公开法庭上表现得规矩得体，但在证言记录时却并非如此。法官阁下，郭文贵先生闪烁其词，嘲弄了该程序；我们准备了该视频，并且有权播放，以便法院能够看到我们在此真正面对的是什么。\n\n纽约州判例法明确指出，在法庭程序中闪烁其词及作出虚假陈述，是法院可以考虑的因素；在看过这些内容后，我认为法院会同意，很难想象还有更有力、更直接且更重要的闪烁其词证据。\n\n郭文贵先生自进入本国以来已提起约 17 起诉讼。他完全知道法律程序如何运作；在其作为原告时，他会予以配合，但您需要看看，当我们向他提问而他作为被告时，他是如何行事的。我们将播放这些片段。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约郡书记官）05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　案件 22-50073　文件 404-17　提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 11 页，共 126 页\n\n庭审记录\n\n这是第一个片段。我问郭文贵先生——他告诉我他不通过电子邮件沟通，所以我问：您是否检索过短信，以尝试回应我们在本案中的请求？这就是他如何回答我的。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\n莫斯先生：我还试图向郭文贵先生询问一些基本问题。对方提出了重大的范围异议，他们不允许我就实体问题提出任何问题；因此，我试图了解他是否明白，我们在此是讨论扣押问题。以下是我提出该问题时发生的情况。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\n莫斯先生：他们确实允许我询问的议题之一，是 Genever entities（Genever 实体），即郭文贵为购买该公寓而设立的两个空壳实体。他拥有并控制这两个实体，并且也是两者的公司代表；因此，即使出于某种原因，他不了解自己亲自设立的实体——当然他了解，因为它们就是他，他就是它们——他也有义务使自己了解相关情况。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约郡书记官）05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　案件 22-50073　文件 404-17　提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 12 页，共 126 页\n\n庭审记录\n\n关于该等事项，以下是我向他提出简单问题时发生的情况。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\n莫斯先生：法官阁下，我们在书面陈述中简要地——抱歉，我们在书面陈述中详细地讨论了律师指示郭文贵先生不得回答证言记录中明显相关问题的情况。标准是他是否意图阻挠判决执行。我问他，如果法院作出判决，您是否会支付？他们指示他不要回答该问题。不存在不得回答此类问题的协议。这完全不恰当。这对他们非常不利。他们今天竭力阻止我向您播放该内容，所以为避免争议，我不会播放；但我认为您确实需要看到，在证言记录期间有许多次，郭文贵先生仅凭自己就拒绝回答，甚至没有任何指示，无论该指示是否恰当。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\n莫斯先生：最后，法官阁下，最后一个片段，在先前的扣押动议中，我们引用了一段 YouTube 音频。那只是一段 YouTube 音频片段，带有说明文字称那是郭文贵先生的声音，据称郭文贵先生正在指示其同事迅速且秘密地出售某些资产。他们在反对文件中严厉批评我们。他们对我们大加指责。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约郡书记官）05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　案件 22-50073　文件 404-17　提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 13 页，共 126 页\n\n庭审记录\n\n他们说，PAX（PAX）甚至不知道那是否是郭文贵先生的声音。他们不知道这是否真实。因此，我想，也许我可以在他的证言记录中问他。我播放了音频并问他：“嘿，那是您吗？”既然他们质疑真实性，我认为这是一个相当公平的问题。以下是随后发生的情况。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\n莫斯先生：谢谢您，法官阁下。我们期待今天陈述我们的案件。\n\n哈蒙先生：早上好，法官阁下。\n\n因此，您提出的第一个问题是我们同意了什么、我们约定了什么；为明确起见，我们确实约定，就本动议而言，被告无需证明其很可能在实体问题上胜诉。我们还就以一本材料提交给您的若干证物作出约定。我们对其中一些有异议，但有一批证物我们约定其真实、相关且应被采纳为证据。\n\n我们已就各种庭审记录及其部分内容作出约定，当然，对于庭审记录的宣读及证物，我们也存在分歧，这些问题可以在听证期间处理。\n\n庭审记录\n\n但是，法官阁下，我没有多媒体演示。我没有剪辑庭审记录或证言记录，以向您提供听起来不错的片段。我们已向您，法官阁下，提交了庭审记录；包括他们指定宣读的部分、我们为完整性而指定的补充部分，我请求法官阁下在今天听证会后阅读这些内容，以了解完整背景。我认为最典型的例子之一是您刚才看到的最后一个片段，他们说郭文贵先生用手指堵住耳朵并拒绝谈论此事、拒绝回答问题，但如果您阅读完整回答，他所说的是：“我质疑其真实性。这不是真的。告诉我。向我证明这是我的声音。我不相信。不要给我播放别人的声音。”因此，关于此事，我要说的就是这些。\n\n我相信，法官阁下，我已仔细阅读了您关于希望在听证会上听取何种证据的告诫和表述。这是我们第三次就扣押动议出现在您面前，我希望在某个时点、某个时间，今天我们将听到一些证据，以回答您就郭文贵先生购买该公寓的意图、出售该公寓的努力、为何发生该等情况以及为何不再发生所提出的问题；而不是原告今天的陈述仅仅重复他们已在两套动议中向您提交过两次的一切内容。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n庭审记录\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\n原告询问我们是否同意接受郭文贵先生要求其今天到庭的传票，我们说没有必要。郭文贵先生将自愿到庭，并将从证人席回答您提出的、我们不反对且您不支持反对的任何问题；您可以直接从郭文贵先生处听取他为何购买该公寓，以及他对该公寓做了什么。法官阁下，如果原告不向郭文贵先生提出这些问题，我会提出。\n\n郭文贵先生不是美国公民。郭文贵先生并非在美国长大。郭文贵先生在中国、在香港长大。他在此寻求免受中国政府迫害的庇护。他及其家人、他在中国的大家庭，一直是中国共产党政府广泛努力打压、虐待和攻击的对象，因为共产党政府不喜欢郭文贵先生关于中国腐败和自由所说的话。\n\n我们在此面临语言障碍。郭文贵先生不会阅读英文，而经双方同意提交给您的证物之一，是购买 Sherry-Netherland（谢里-尼德兰）公寓的买卖合同。该合同为英文。合同上没有郭文贵先生的签名，因为他无法阅读英文。他不理解，或者说在来到本国时并不理解合作所有制的概念；他对所有权的理解，源于他多年在中国从事商业地产开发的经历。这就是他理解家庭和所有权概念的方式。\n\n庭审记录\n\n您可以向他提出一个关于美国——美国人如何理解所有权的问题，您可以将其翻译给他，也可以得到他的回答，而该回答将是英文；您就能获得一句很好的摘录，但我请求法官阁下做的是，在郭文贵先生作证时认识到，这里不仅存在语言问题，也存在文化问题；这些问题需要在郭文贵先生所说的话以及他所做的事情的背景下予以理解。\n\n我们没有在听证会前向您提出证据开示问题，我认为现在也不是提出证据开示问题的适当时机。如果我们处理异议的方式，或我们处理文件提交的方式存在问题，我们本应在会面协商中处理并解决证据开示问题。我们没有那样做。因此，我认为，基于这次陈述，您今天将从原告处听到的是对他们已经在两套动议中陈述过两次的一切内容的重申和重新提出。我希望今天不会是这样。我希望我们能转向一些真正的证据，以处理法官阁下所提出的问题；我告诉您，法官阁下，如果原告不将其作为其案件的一部分提出，我将在交叉询问郭文贵先生时提出。谢谢。\n\n莫斯先生：法官阁下，我只想非常、非常简短地回应几项内容。首先，就证据而言，您问我们——\n\n法院：我们应当直接进行证言。\n\n莫斯先生：开始吧。很好。谢谢您，法官阁下。\n\n法院：我们此前已就动议辩论过两次。\n\n莫斯先生：可以，法官阁下。我们传唤第一位证人，Yan Ping Wang（王燕平）。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约郡书记官）05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　案件 22-50073　文件 404-17　提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 18 页，共 126 页\n\n王燕平代表原告——莫斯直接询问\n\nYAN PING WANG（王燕平）经书记官依法宣誓后，接受询问并作如下证言：\n\n书记官：请以洪亮、清晰的声音陈述您的全名和地址。\n\n证人：我叫 Wang, Yan Ping。我的地址是 22D。\n\n东57街，纽约，纽约州。\n\n书记员：谢谢。请坐。\n\n证人：谢谢，先生。\n\n法警：证人已宣誓，法官阁下。\n\nMoss（莫斯先生）：法官阁下，我有一份Wang（王女士）的证言记录副本。我可以上前交给她吗？\n\n谢谢。\n\n（随后，一份文件交给了证人。）\n\n直接询问\n\n由Moss先生进行：\n\n问：Wang女士，您为Kwok先生工作，对吗？\n\n答：我为整个家族工作。\n\n问：Kwok先生的家族？\n\n答：不。Guo Family（郭氏家族）。G-U-O。\n\n问：Kwok先生的名字是什么？\n\n答：Kwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）。\n\n问：Guo，对吗？同一个Guo，即姓氏？\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n答：他是家族成员。他的名字是Kwok，K-W-O-K。他的家族是Guo，G-U-O。\n\n问：您是否否认您为Kwok先生家族的企业工作？\n\n答：让我解释一下。Guo先生，Guo家族，他的家族有一百多人，包括他的七个——我相信总共，包括他本人在内——七个兄弟，而他们各自有不同的、类似于家庭的小家庭。因此，全部加在一起，这个家族有一百多人。因此，这个家族中不同的家族成员，在家族企业中各自负责不同的部分。所以我为整个家族工作。\n\n问：该家族的一名成员是Kwok先生？\n\n答：是的。他是家族成员之一。\n\n问：您曾为Kwok先生家族在香港的公司工作，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：自2018年2月起，您为其家族在纽约的一家公司工作，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：那么，自2009年以来，也就是过去10年间，除Guo Family外，您没有其他雇主，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：我想谈谈Kwok先生出售该公寓所作的努力。直到最近，您知道Kwok先生的经纪人是Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆），对吗？\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您代表Kwok先生，曾与Sloane女士讨论出售该公寓，对吗？\n\n答：让我更正一下。我是Kwok先生与Kathy Sloane女士之间的联络人，因为Kwok先生完全不会读写英语，所以Kathy Sloane女士很多时候联系我，请我向Kwok先生转达她的信息；然后，因为Kwok先生不会读写英语，我必须为他翻译，将他的信息译成英语，再发回给Kathy Sloane女士。\n\n问：明白。感谢您的澄清。\n\n答：谢谢。\n\n问：而且有时您代表Kwok先生，就出售该公寓的努力与——Wang女士，抱歉——与Sloane女士交换电子邮件，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\nMoss先生：如获准许，法官阁下？\n\n（随后，一份文件交给了证人。）\n\n（随后，一份证物向法庭展示。）\n\nMoss先生：原告证物17号，已获准作为证据。\n\n问：Wang女士，这是Sloane女士于2016年11月发来的一封电子邮件，对吗？\n\n纽约县书记员办公室备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　纽约州法院电子备案系统文件编号：331　纽约州法院电子备案系统收到日期：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交日期：05/20/22　录入日期：05/20/22 11:52:18　第21页，共126页\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n问：2016年11月，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：有一个电子邮箱地址，Yvette Wong，或者Yvette.yue423 at GMail，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：那是您的电子邮箱地址？\n\n答：那曾是我的电子邮箱地址，但我现在无法登录，因为我的很多电子邮箱地址都被Chinese Communist Party（中国共产党）黑了，所以我不再有访问权限。抱歉。\n\n问：请原谅。我很抱歉差点打断您。当时，这是您的电子邮箱地址？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：而且您发送和接收了这些电子邮件？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：我想请您注意页面底部以“Dear Miles”开头的电子邮件。它写道：“我一直在认真考虑有人为您在Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-尼德兰）的公寓提出的报价。”您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：在大约这个时候，有人曾对该公寓提出报价，对吗？\n\n答：从这封电子邮件来看，是的。\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n纽约县书记员办公室备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　纽约州法院电子备案系统文件编号：331　纽约州法院电子备案系统收到日期：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交日期：05/20/22　录入日期：05/20/22 11:52:18　第22页，共126页\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n问：那么，您知道这一点。那封电子邮件唤起了您的记忆，即曾有一项$60 million的报价摆在桌面上，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：它写道：“我理解您在同意以67 million作出还价时，已经作出了非常重大的让步。”对吗？我读得对吗？\n\n答：这是Kathy Sloane女士发来的电子邮件。\n\n问：对。而她所说的是，Kwok先生对该报价作出了还价，对吗？您知道这一点吗？\n\n答：我不知道这个。\n\n问：您不知道Kwok先生是否对该报价作出了还价？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：好的。而且她在顶部写道：“Dear Yvette，请在您方便时尽早将此读给Miles听。”您看到了吗？\n\n问：您看到了“Dear Yvette，请在您方便时尽早将此读给Miles听”这一部分吗？\n\n答：哪一页？\n\n问：看到“请在您方便时尽早将此读给Miles听”这一部分吗？\n\n答：是的。我看到了。\n\n问：而Miles就是Kwok先生，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n案号：652077/2017\n\n纽约县书记员办公室备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n\n纽约州法院电子备案系统文件编号：331　案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交日期：05/20/22　录入日期：05/20/22 11:52:18　第23页，共126页\n\n纽约州法院电子备案系统收到日期：05/08/2019\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n问：您把它读给他听了，对吗？\n\n答：是的，我读了。\n\n问：而且我想就此向法庭非常、非常明确地说明：Kwok先生知道这项$60 million的报价，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您对此毫无疑问，对吗？\n\n答：Kwok先生从Kathy Sloane女士那里知道了此事，这就是为什么我说我不知道，因为这是我收集到的信息，或者说获得的信息，也就是说，要么是Kathy Sloane女士告诉我的，要么是她发电子邮件给我的。然后我看到了那封电子邮件。我说，哦，好的，有一项报价，就像这样。或者是Kwok先生告诉我的。所以，这就是为什么当他们两人讨论、收集或提到这些事情时，这并不是我亲自获得的信息，不是我的个人信息。因此，这不是我的个人信息。\n\n当您问我是否知道时，我只是这两人之间的传话人。我没有那种个人信息。我只是从Kathy Sloane女士或Kwok先生那里收集到该信息。我只是一个传话人。\n\n问：对。您把Kathy Sloane告诉您的、有关该$60 million报价的信息转达给Kwok先生。\n\n答：我转达了。\n\n问：对。而Kwok先生知道该报价。\n\n纽约县书记员办公室备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017\n\n案件22-50073\n\n纽约州法院电子备案系统文件编号：331　文件404-17　提交日期：05/20/22\n\n126　录入日期：05/20/22 11:52:18　第24页，共126页\n\n纽约州法院电子备案系统收到日期：05/08/2019\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n问：在本案中？\n\n答：是。正确。\n\n问：您知道您在本案中提交过一份宣誓书吗？\n\n答：是。\n\nMoss先生：法官阁下，它尚未作为证据。他们对其提出异议。我提出该文件。不是为了证明其内容真实。\n\nMoss先生：这是原告证物34号。\n\n问：Wang女士，这是您的宣誓书，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您是代表Kwok先生作出的，对吗？\n\n答：是的，我是代表Golden Spring New York（纽约金泉）和Guo Family作出的。\n\n问：不过，您是为支持Kwok先生反对我们查封其公寓的动议而作出的。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：让我们看看这份宣誓书。\n\n（随后，一份文件交给了证人。）\n\n（随后，一份证物向法庭展示。）\n\nSearles女士：实际上，这份特定证物存在几个关键问题。其中一份证物，即其附件C，受一项就实体问题达成的约定所约束，而且我们一直在就质押问题进行讨论。法官阁下已经明确，质押与是否能够实施查封无关；它只与优先顺位有关。我不反对他们将其用于弹劾。显然，这是一份提交给法庭的诉状，但我认为它不适合作为证据获准采纳。这就是我对此的异议。\n\nMoss先生：法官阁下，听起来这是一项关联性异议，我认为法官阁下可以根据其应有的分量予以考量。显然，它已提交给法庭。对于一个问题，我们可以暂缓讨论质押，因为我认为今天它会被多次提及。CPLR 6201(3)谈到，意图妨碍判决执行而对资产设定负担。判例表明，质押是一种负担。他们把这个问题提交给您。他们说，我们已将其质押，因此您不能查封它。您驳回了该主张，因为那是一个优先顺位问题，但他们正试图扭曲该规则，并说质押不在本案审理范围内，且与本案无关。这一点载于CPLR中，而关于质押的虚假陈述直接关系到欺诈意图，因此不可能更具关联性。这是他们提交给她的证据。\n\n纽约县书记员办公室备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　纽约州法院电子备案系统文件编号：331　纽约州法院电子备案系统收到日期：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交日期：05/20/22　录入日期：05/20/22 11:52:18　第26页，共126页\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n法庭：证人正在证人席上。您可以向证人询问任何您想问的问题。在证人此前已经作出的宣誓证言与她今天所作证言不一致的范围内，您可以将该宣誓书用于弹劾目的，因此确实没有必要将该宣誓书作为证据提交，因为她就在这里。您可以问她任何您想问的问题。\n\n证人：谢谢。\n\n问：Wang女士，让我们看看这份宣誓书。\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：您提交该宣誓书是为了支持反对查封动议，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您明白这是一份法律文件吗？\n\n答：是的，我明白。\n\n问：您明白它将在法律程序中使用吗？\n\n答：是的，我明白。\n\n问：而且您知道它将提交到这里的Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院），交给Ostrager法官，对吗？\n\n答：是。我得知了这一点。我仍在学习。\n\n问：您明白这不只是一份随意的宣誓书，对吗？\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n纽约县书记员办公室备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　纽约州法院电子备案系统文件编号：331　纽约州法院电子备案系统收到日期：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交日期：05/20/22　录入日期：05/20/22 11:52:18　第27页，共126页\n\nWang女士— 原告方证人— 由Moss先生直接询问\n\n答：这份宣誓书是由律师起草的，所以其中很多英文……\n\n信息，即我所能看到的信息，因为我在这里，是 Golden Spring New York（纽约金泉公司）的管理人和总裁，是管理人；我知道我是收集文件或信息的人。我努力收集文件、获取信息。因此，这里所有这些信息都不是我的个人所知，因为我没有参与这里的任何事情，所以我是在努力帮助从不同的人那里收集信息和文件。\n\n问：王女士，您曾向法庭宣誓，Kwok 先生（郭文贵）拥有该公寓，对吗？并且他是通过另一实体拥有该公寓，对吗？\n\nSEARLES 女士（瑟尔斯）：异议。诱导性提问。\n\n法庭：驳回异议。\n\n法庭书记员：您可以回答。\n\n证人：我可以回答。好的。\n\n答：在这份宣誓书中，我宣誓，是的。\n\n问：而且您不知道 Kwok 先生是否拥有该公寓，对吗？\n\n答：当您说我不知道时，我不明白，您是在说我的个人所知吗？我确实不知道，因为就个人而言，在购买这套公寓时，或者之后发生的事情，特别是在购买时，我不在美国，也没有参与、处理、沟通或谈判，也完全没有参加任何会议。因此，我对此没有任何个人所知。这一切都是在我被要求后，我必须开始询问他人、收集信息、从其他人那里收集信息。\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n已提交：纽约郡书记员，05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019　案件 22-50073　文件 404-17　提交：05/20/22　录入：05/20/22 11:52:18　第 29 页，共 126 页\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\nMOSS 先生：让我们播放证言录像。\n\n（播放录像带。）\n\n问：您从未见过任何一份关于该公寓所有权的文件，对吗？\n\n答：自本案开始以来，我确实见过关于该所有权的文件。因此，律师请我帮忙寻找文件。我确实见过一些文件。\n\n（随后，向法庭展示了一份证物。）\n\n法庭：听着，不用幻灯片，您要问她是否知道 Kwok 先生是否拥有该公寓。她要么知道，要么不知道。如果她说不知道，而她先前曾宣誓说他拥有该公寓，那么您可以质疑她。如果她说他不拥有该公寓，而她先前曾宣誓说他拥有该公寓，那么您可以质疑她，但我们现在所做的只是引出她的证言。\n\n问：王女士，您刚才作证说您不知道 Kwok 先生拥有该公寓，而我要请您注意您宣誓书的第二段。\n\nSEARLES 女士：异议。该说法歪曲了她的证言。\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019　案件 22-50073　文件 404-17　提交：05/20/22　录入：05/20/22 11:52:18　第 30 页，共 126 页\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n法庭：好的。听着，您是否知道 Kwok 先生是否拥有该公寓？是或否。\n\n证人：知道，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：那么他拥有该公寓吗？\n\n证人：我听说，仍然是我听说，通过一个不同的实体，且不同的实体拥有该公寓，而他拥有，比如说，该不同实体。这是我从全部文件中了解到的。\n\n法庭：您没有个人所知——\n\n证人：没有。\n\n法庭：——无论是哪一种情况？\n\n证人：没有，法官阁下。是的。\n\n问：王女士，我是否理解正确，您刚刚说您确实见过有关该公寓所有权的文件？\n\n答：正确。\n\n法庭：好的。继续。\n\n问：请看您的证言记录，第 78 页。\n\n法庭：我们不是这样做的。我们有很多动议文件。如果您要用证言记录进行质疑，您应当说：“您是否记得曾接受证言询问？您是否记得被问到以下问题并作出以下回答？”这样就会进入记录；如果构成质疑，我会注意到。如果无关紧要，我会忽略。\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n问：王女士，您是否记得我曾对您进行证言询问？\n\n答：是的。是您，先生。\n\n问：我要读一下：\n\n“问题：您认为谁是该公寓的所有人？\n\n“回答：我不知道，因为我从未见过任何文件摆在我面前，所以我不知道。这都是我从他那里听说的，但是——我不知道。”\n\n您是否记得被问到该问题并作出该回答？\n\n答：是的，我记得。\n\n问：您就该公寓所有权所作的任何陈述都只是猜测，对吗？\n\n答：我有个人信息，好吗？其次，当时是您对我进行证言询问，先生，我非常紧张。我必须说，即使现在，我仍然很紧张，因为这是我第一次坐在法官阁下和本法庭面前。请让我解释，先生。因此，关于这套公寓的全部信息，是我收集的信息，我没有——\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n外语是法语，我正在学习英语，所以存在很多语言障碍。\n\n因此，当时是您对我进行证言询问，先生，我非常紧张，而您给我看了，我记得，一些文件，像是这种文件，我很难在您面前阅读所有这些技术性、法律性、财务性的文件。因此，这就是我非常紧张的原因。\n\n还有，顺便说一下，我记得在您对我进行证言询问时，您没有向我出示我的宣誓书，对吗？您没有向我出示这个，而只是向我出示了这个（指示）。所以当时我拿到那个时，我的手在发抖。我试图阅读所有这些，加上这些文件，我只是从其他人那里收集而来。因此，我试图在非常有限的时间内给您一个回答。我不想浪费其他任何人的时间。所以当我无法辨认，且不确定时，我就说我不知道。\n\n但基本上，在本案中，我只是——我是一个非常保守的人，能够对我的个人所知负责。如果您知道，这是我收集的信息、我收集的知识，或者只是经由我手的文件。我非常紧张，就像现在一样。我可能会说，先生，我不知道，我不记得。是的。这就是当时您对我进行证言询问时我的情况。\n\n问：证言记录第 78 页：\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\n案号：652077/2017\n已提交：纽约郡书记员，05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案件 22-50073\n文件 404-17\n提交：05/20/22\n录入：05/20/22 11:52:18\n第 33 页，共 126 页\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n“问题：您认为他拥有它吗？\n\n“回答：我不知道。我不能猜测。”\n\n您是否记得被问到该问题并作出该回答？\n\n答：是的，先生。\n\n问：而且您知道，尽管我们曾问您在证言询问时是否需要翻译，您的律师拒绝在证言询问时安排翻译，对吗？\n\nSEARLES 女士：不。异议。为澄清起见，我们没有拒绝。\n\n法庭：好的。听着——\n\nSEARLES 女士：证人表示她不需要翻译。\n\n法庭：你们双方的所有论点都已在详尽的认定中记载。我不想听任何论点。我只想听取证言，并希望以正常且迅速的方式引出证言。因此，我们在过去几分钟中所完成的一切，是该证人表示她对该公寓的所有权没有个人所知。这是她在证言询问中所作的证言，也是她现在在证人席上所作的证言。下一个问题。\n\nSEARLES 女士：谢谢您，法官阁下。\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n问：王女士，您不知道，也完全不知道购买该公寓的资金来自哪里，对吗？\n\n答：我对此没有个人所知。\n\n问：从未有人告诉过您，对吗？\n\n答：没有人告诉我，但我听到过讨论。也许因为我被要求努力收集信息。\n\n问：您对购买该公寓完全不了解，因为当时您正在休假并居住在北京，对吗？\n\n答：该公寓被购买时？我对购买该公寓没有个人所知，因为当时我在北京，是的。\n\n问：您不知道 Kwok 先生是否通过 Genever（杰尼弗）拥有该公寓，对吗？\n\n答：我是在本案发生后了解到的。是的。\n\n问：您是在证言询问之后了解到的吗？\n\n答：不是。我是在本案发生时，包括证言询问期间了解到的，因为我被要求为律师收集信息。\n\n问：“问题：您明白 Kwok 先生最终拥有该公寓，因为他拥有 Genever 吗？\n\n“回答：我对此并不十分清楚。”\n\n“问题：您不确定谁拥有 Genever 吗？\n\n“回答：是。”\n\n已提交：纽约郡书记员，05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019　案件 22-50073　文件 404-17　提交：05/20/22　录入：05/20/22 11:52:18　第 35 页，共 126 页\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n您是否记得被问到那些问题并作出那些回答？\n\nHARMON 先生（哈蒙）：法官阁下，如果 Moss 先生正在从证言记录中朗读，他能否先告诉我们他从哪一页、哪一行开始读，这样我们可以跟上？\n\n法庭：继续。\n\nMOSS 先生：我刚才读的是第 77 页，第 13 行至第 19 行。\n\n问：您是否记得被问到那些问题并作出那些回答？\n\n答：是的，我记得。\n\n问：您不知道谁拥有 Genever，对吗？\n\n答：我对此没有个人所知。\n\n问：您不知道谁拥有 Genever New York（杰尼弗纽约）或 Genever B.V.I.（杰尼弗英属维尔京群岛），对吗？\n\n答：我收集到的信息是，英属维尔京群岛公司拥有纽约有限责任公司，而纽约有限责任公司拥有该公寓。\n\n问：现在我要从您的证言记录第 102 页第 7 行至第 9 行朗读：\n\n“问题：您不知道谁拥有 Genever New York 或 Genever B.V.I.\n\n“回答：我不知道。”\n\n您是否记得被问到该问题并作出该回答？\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n答：是的，我记得，先生。当我说我不知道时，我的意思是我有个人信息，而且我不太确定，所以为了作出保守的回答，我宁愿说我不知道。\n\n问：即使您曾在向本法庭提交的宣誓书中宣誓那些事情？\n\n答：先生，我们的理解不同。比如说，我的理解是个人信息；我说的是，我是一个保守的中国女性，所以如果我没有那些个人信息，或者我没有亲手参与、处理，我宁愿说我不知道。是的，我不想猜测。\n\n问：所以您在证言询问时很保守，但在法庭上作出同样陈述时却不保守？\n\n答：我是一个保守的人，先生，而且我会是，并且我对我的个人所知和信息百分之百负责。当我只是收集信息，或者听说、听到某些事情时，如果我不确定，我通常就说我不知道。是的。\n\n问：那么，如果您对宣誓书中的任何事情都没有个人所知，谁对此负责？\n\n答：正确。我没有个人信息。\n\n问：那么，既然您——谁对该宣誓书负责？\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记官）05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文书 404-17 提交于 05/20/22 录入于 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 37 页，共 126 页\n\n36 Wang（王）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n1　没有个人信息？\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6　答　问　答　问　知情？谁的宣誓书？你的宣誓书？\n　　哦。我的。我本人。是的。但是你刚刚告诉我，对于宣誓书中的事实，你没有个人知情，而且在你没有个人知情时，你不承担责任；对吗？\n7\n8　答　先生，我对我的宣誓书百分之百负责，\n9\n10\n11\n12　我已宣誓确认该宣誓书。所以——我正在解释，因为我所说的、我所理解的这里的区别，我非常感激有这个机会解释，在您对我进行询问时我所作的陈述，与我实际所指的我是否有个人信息之间，存在理解上的差异，\n13　先生，和另外——很抱歉我的语言表达。有时您盯着我问那个问题时，我会非常紧张。即使现在也是。\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20　问　很抱歉。我并非想让你紧张。对此抱歉。你甚至不知道有两个独立的 Genever（吉尼弗）实体；对吗？\n21\n22　答　您是指个人知情，还是我收集的信息？\n23\n24　问　我的意思是，我问你这个问题：你是否知道\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\n25　是否存在两个独立的 Genever 实体？\nWang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n\n1　答　我收集到的信息表明，存在两个独立实体。\n2\n3　问　你并不了解 Genever Holdings LLC（Genever Holdings有限责任公司）或 Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever Holdings公司）任何资产质押的情况；对吗？\n4\n5\n6　答　再次说明，我对此并无任何个人知情。这是我收集的信息。我听说过此事。\n7\n8　问　所以，你就你没有个人知情的事实向法院作出了宣誓陈述；那是你听说过的、收集来的信息？这是你的证言？\n9\n10\n11\n12　答　我的证言是，信息有两种，即个人信息知情和收集信息知情。\n13\n14\n15　问　而且，对于该公寓的任何质押，你没有个人知情；对吗？\n16\n17　答　正确，先生。\n18　问　你不知道该公寓是否曾被质押过；对吗？\n19\n20　答　我没有该个人信息。\n21　问　你从未与任何人就质押该公寓进行过任何讨论；对吗？\n22\n23　答　我本人并未就此讨论过任何事情。\n24　问　你从未与 Kwok（郭文贵）先生就任何质押进行过任何讨论；对吗？\n25\nLisa A. Casey—官方法庭记录员\nWang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n\n1　答　我可以问一下，您所说的“讨论”是什么意思吗？您是指询问、提及，还是讨论我们如何质押、如何解决、策略计划是什么？我对您的问题感到困惑。您所说的“讨论”是什么意思？\n2\n3\n4\n5　问　你是否曾与 Kwok 先生谈论过质押？\n6　答　我提过，或者他向我提过，我记不太清楚。只是，“哦，有一项质押。”但我从未参与过，例如，“好，坐下来告诉我发生了什么，细节是什么”；而且我从未参与过，例如，“好，我去那里办理那项质押。”我没有做过那种事。\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12　问　我将宣读你的证词记录，第81页，第9至11行：\n13\n14　“你从未与 Kwok 先生就质押进行过任何讨论？\n15\n16　“答：没有。”\n17　你记得被问过该问题并作出该回答吗？\n18\n19　法庭：这与她刚才的证言并不矛盾。这与她刚才所说的完全一致。\n20\n21\n22　Moss 先生：法官阁下，她在证词记录中否认进行过任何谈话，而她刚刚说她确实进行过一次谈话。\n23\n24\n25　法庭：这不是我听到她所说的。我——\n\nWang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问　39\n\n1　你是否与 Kwok 先生就该公寓的所有权进行过谈话？\n2\n3　证人：没有，先生。我只是听说。我问他，他告诉了我，我知道，好，这是该情况。但我没有进行过类似五分钟、十分钟的讨论，或者坐下来逐项了解细节。\n4\n5\n6\n7　因为我就像一名行政人员，为律师收集信息并为律师取得文件，所以我不了解背景，也不了解其中的逻辑。\n8\n9\n10\n11　问　Kwok 先生是否曾告诉你，该公寓或 Genever 已被质押？\n12\n13　答　抱歉，先生。问题是什么？\n14　问　Kwok 先生是否曾告诉你，该公寓或 Genever 已被质押？\n15\n16　答　我相信不是他。是的。\n17　问　你相信他没有告诉你这一点？\n18　答　他向我提过这一点。\n19　问　Kwok 先生告诉你，该公寓或 Genever 被质押了？\n20\n21　答　我不记得是他第一次告诉我，还是我告诉他，因为我从其他人那里收集到了该信息。然后，差不多是我告诉了他，而他向我提起了此事。\n22\n23\n24　问　在你的证词记录中，第81页：\n25\nLisa A. Casey—官方法庭记录员\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文书 404-17 提交于 05/20/22 录入于 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 41 页，共 126 页\n\nWang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n“问：你从未告诉 Kwok 先生 Genever 已被质押？\n“答：没有。\n“问：他从未告诉你它已被质押？\n“答：没有。”\n问　你记得被问过这些问题并作出这些回答吗？\n答　正确，先生。\n问　如果可以，请翻到你宣誓书的附件B。\n（随即，向法庭展示了一份证物。）\n问　我想请你注意第一页。这是你附在宣誓书上的一份文件；对吗，Wang 女士？\n答　正确。\n问　这是为了支持你关于该公寓已被质押的陈述；对吗？\n答　看起来是的。\n问　我想请你注意第一页。你看到有一个押记编号 FBAKOY 吗？\n答　抱歉。哪一页，先生？\n问　就在这里。这是附件B的第一页。你看到了押记编号吗？上面写着 FBAKOY？\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文书 404-17 提交于 05/20/22 录入于 05/20/22 11:52:18 第 42 页，共 126 页\n\n41 Wang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n1　答　是。我看到了。\n2　问　该质押是向 Roscalitar 2（罗斯卡利塔尔2）设立的？\n3　答　是。\n4　问　质押日期是 May 21, 2015；对吗？\n5　答　正确。\n6　问　是否有人曾告诉你，或者你是否曾收集到该信息——\n7\n8\n9　SEARLES（希尔斯）女士：反对。法官阁下，很抱歉再次打断，但他一直在宣读这份实际上尚未作为证据提交的文件。\n10\n11\n12　法庭：这是你们证物册中的一份证物吗？\n13\n14\n15　Moss 先生：是。它在证物册中，而且是她的宣誓书——附在她的宣誓书上。这是他们的文件。\n16\n17　问　Wang 女士，当你向法庭提交该文件并宣誓该公寓自 May of 2015 起已被质押时，你是否知道——该质押实际上已在 March of 2017 终止？在你提交宣誓书之前，你是否知道该质押已被终止？\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24　SEARLES 女士：但它尚未被接纳为证据。这是我们对此有异议的文件之一。\n25　法庭：好。听着，继续吧。\n答　先生，请让我再次说明。当您对我进行询问时，您给我看了这个，却没有给我看我的宣誓书。请记住，我签署的宣誓书大约是一年前的，而当您对我进行询问时，您只给我看了证物，没有给我看我的任何宣誓书；而且所有这些证物，都只是我从他人那里收集来的。\n\nLisa A. Casey—官方法庭记录员\nWang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14　我必须强调，作为 Golden Spring（黄金泉）的行政人员，我每天都为您、为我的律师以及为其他项目收集文件和信息，因此我收集的文件和信息很多。我无法记住哪一份文件用于何事，所以当您对我进行询问时，您向我出示的只是我数千、数百万页其他文件中的一两页。\n15\n16　而且我必须说，我之所以是收集这些文件的人，是因为我的同事，要么被中国共产党绑架，要么因受到威胁而辞职，要么什么也没有留下就离开了。\n17\n18　所以我处于一个非常无助的位置，帮助收集所有这些文件。\n19\n20　而且，许多文件我只是放进我的档案中，没有时间审阅，因此当您在证词询问中向我出示这些文件，并问我是否能立即凭记忆告诉您，这些文件是什么、解决了什么、其中有什么，对我而言确实非常困难。\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nWang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n\n1　这就像是我所有档案中的两三张纸。\n2　问　好的。所以我不是在谈你的证词询问。我问你的问题——非常简单。让我再试一次。\n3\n4　当你提交该文件并宣誓该公寓自 May of 2015 起已被质押时，你是否知道该质押已在 March of 2017 终止，而且你宣誓称已被质押的公寓实际上已不再被质押？你知道吗？\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9　答　我没有个人信息、个人知情。\n10　问　在你向法庭宣誓它已终止之前，你是否听说该质押已被终止？\n11\n12　答　我不记得了，先生。\n13　Moss 先生：法官阁下，可以吗？\n14　（随即，一份文件被交给证人。）\n15\n16　HARMON（哈蒙）先生：法官阁下——\n17　SEARLES 女士：我们能知道他给她看了什么吗？\n18\n19　Moss 先生：这是 PX 43。他们对该文件提出的是关联性异议，而非真实性异议，法官阁下。它在证物夹中。\n20\n21\n22　（随即，向法庭展示了一份证物。）\n23\n24　SEARLES 女士：这是我之前就这些质押提出的同样的关联性异议。\n25\nLisa A. Casey—官方法庭记录员\n\nWang—代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n\n1　这与您在我们上次口头辩论中所概述、您今天想听取的内容无关。那是关于该公寓买卖的时间和情况。\n2\n3\n4　我认为，在这一点上，任何一方之间均不存在争议：该公寓一度存在质押，而目前该公寓不存在任何质押，所以我不知道为什么我们继续讨论此事。如果该质押不存在，它就不是实际的负担。\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10　Moss 先生：法官阁下，如果他们愿意约定，她宣誓称存在的质押在她提交宣誓书之前已经终止，我很乐意这样做，以避免浪费时间。\n11\n12\n13\n14　SEARLES 女士：不。我不会对此作出约定，但我会约定，自她完成宣誓书以来，以及自我们进行了口头辩论以来，并且经过了不知多少个月的判决前扣押取证，该质押已被解除；我认为我们对此并无任何分歧。\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20　法庭：这是一份说明该质押已经解除的文件。你对此没有争议。那么我们为什么要浪费时间？\n21\n22\n23　SEARLES 女士：这正是我的问题，即为什么我们继续讨论某件事情——\n24\n25　法庭：我将你的陈述视为一项约定，即该质押已经解除，因此没有必要就该文件进行任何询问。\n\nSEARLES 女士：我只是想百分之百明确，并不是说我作出该陈述；目前不存在任何质押。它已经解除。\n\n7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 我们从 DC（哥伦比亚特区）取得的文件与我们从 B.V.I.（英属维尔京群岛）取得的文件之间存在不一致；在某一点上存在差异，即我们的文件日期与他们的文件时间相近，并称该质押尚未解除。他们的文件则称已解除。我们当时主张 B.V.I. 的文件才是适当的文件。我们是从外部协助方那里取得该文件的。不是我们自行取得的。\n\n15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 不过，截至目前，已不存在任何质押，我们对此均无异议，因此我想明确指出，部分文件以及质押解除的时间存在不一致；但该质押至今已解除数月。因此，再次说明，我不明白为何我们仍继续讨论此事，因为如果争议是依据 CPLR 的负担，则不存在任何负担。\n\n24 25 法院：这是一次为期一天的听证。听证现已进行了一个半小时，其中三分之一是律师之间的讨论和／或对两套文件内容的重复陈述。你们已约定该公寓不存在现行有效的质押，因此我不知道这份特定文件与任何事项有何关联。\n\n她已约定不存在现行有效的质押。\n\n莫斯先生：法官阁下，我能否就关联性作出回应，法官阁下？\n\n法院：可以。\n\n莫斯先生：王女士的宣誓书向法院宣誓称该质押仍然存在，而在其宣誓书作出前一年，该质押已经终止，因此，在本程序中，为试图避免扣押而就质押存在向法院作出的陈述是虚假陈述。这直接关系到可信度。\n\n这直接关系到欺诈。\n\n法院：好的。那么——\n\n莫斯先生：如果这样更合适，法官阁下，我可以继续下一个问题。我很愿意继续下一个问题。\n\n问：王女士，我理解你在提交宣誓书之前从未见过那份文件，对吗？就是你面前的那份文件？\n\n答：哪一份文件？\n\n问：PX 43，你从未见过？\n\n答：即使现在，让我告诉你，我也不记得那份文件。\n\n王——原告方证人——由莫斯直接询问\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331，NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n\n答：是的。而且请允许我再重复一次，我是 Golden Spring（黄金泉）的管理人。这不是我的选择。因为 Chinese Communist Party（中国共产党）绑架了我和公司之间几乎所有的同事。因此，我的背景并不具备房地产专业知识。\n\n我也不具备金融专业知识。我也不具备美国金融专业知识。因此，当时我是唯一一个至少会说一点英语、并试图帮助这个家庭的人，所以才会如此。我的许多同事，要么被绑架，要么失踪，要么一言不发地离开，把他们的东西丢在我的桌上。我花了很长时间试图学习、消化并弄清楚那些东西是什么，而我不擅长阅读文件。即使现在，先生，你向我出示这个，我在这里非常紧张；如果你不指出“Pledge（质押）”这个词所在的位置，我仍无法认出这是一份经我手的文件。因为我的背景确实如此，我不是骗子，我从未伪造任何东西，而我在这里的原因，是试图提供帮助，帮助本案。谢谢你，先生。\n\n问：谢谢。\n\n莫斯先生：目前没有进一步问题，法官阁下。\n\n交叉询问\n\n由瑟尔斯女士进行：\n\n问：早上好，王女士。我会尽量说大声一些，以便你能听见我。\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——法庭正式记录员\n\n王——原告方证人——由瑟尔斯交叉询问\n\n瑟尔斯女士：我只是想稍微退一步，以便让法官阁下更好地了解一件事。\n\n问：你最初何时开始为郭氏家族工作？\n\n答：我在 Beijing（北京）时就开始为郭氏家族工作。我从 Europe（欧洲）回来。我完成大学学业后回到北京，开始为郭氏家族工作。\n\n问：当你说“郭氏家族”时，你指的不只是郭先生的直系家庭成员，对吗？\n\n答：对。关于郭氏家族，据我所知，有很多人，而郭先生，Miles Kwok（郭文贵），是整个家族的第七个儿子。他有几位哥哥，也有父母。他有侄女、侄子和嫂嫂；目前，他的五哥和六哥仍在监狱中。他们被中国共产党逮捕并投入监狱。他的许多家庭成员，包括他的儿子、女儿、侄女、侄子、嫂嫂和兄弟，直到现在都在毫无理由的情况下受到威胁、绑架并被投入监狱，包括所有像我一样的长期雇员。\n\n问：而你所服务的这个郭氏家族，位于世界各地多个地方，包括中国，\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——法庭正式记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331，NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331，NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019，案号 22-50073，文件 404-17，提交日期 05/20/22，登记日期 05/20/22 11:52:18，第 50 页，共 126 页\n\n王——原告方证人——由瑟尔斯交叉询问\n\n问：包括你刚才所谈到的那些人？\n\n答：对。他们住在 China（中国）、Mainland China（中国大陆），他们确实住在那里，也住在例如 Hong Kong（香港）、Europe（欧洲）和 America（美国）。遍布世界各地。\n\n问：你何时搬到 New York（纽约）开始为郭氏家族工作？\n\n答：那是我永远不会忘记的日期。那是 April 23rd, 2015。我来到纽约和美国。我再也无法回到中国看望我的家人和儿子。我离开中国时，我的儿子一岁五个月。现在他快六岁了，即将上学。自 2017 年底以来，我的家人、我的丈夫和我的儿子就停止与我交谈；截至目前已超过 16 个月，我没有听到他们的任何消息，也没有收到他们的任何消息。\n\n中国共产党伪造了我的许多东西。他们伪造我的声音、我的录音、我的文件。他们伪造了我所有的个人信息。他们威胁我的丈夫。他们拘留我的丈夫，审问我的丈夫。他们告诉我丈夫，我背叛了国家，背叛了家庭，抛弃了儿子和家庭，而我从未同意这些说法。因此，自 2017 年底以来，我丈夫就停止与我交谈；截至目前，我儿子也已超过 16 个月没有通过 WhatsApp、WeChat 或视频与我交谈或见我。我来这里有两个原因。第一，我是一个忠诚的人。\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——法庭正式记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331，NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019，案号 22-50073，文件 404-17，提交日期 05/20/22，登记日期 05/20/22 11:52:18，第 51 页，共 126 页\n\n王——原告方证人——由瑟尔斯交叉询问\n\n我的丈夫是我的第一个男朋友。我在 France（法国）上大学时认识他，我们一起学习。我们结婚了，我从未有过第二个男朋友。我从未有过第二任丈夫。我多次告诉他，我不是要离开你。我只是处于一个我无法控制的境况中。但中国共产党继续威胁他和他的整个家庭，并强迫我丈夫与我离婚。\n\n这是他们第三次试图这样做。上个月，由于我丈夫已经超过大约 16 个月不再与我交谈，我丈夫的律师通过我哥哥联系了我。我弟弟告诉我，姐姐，他们想和你离婚，需要你出现在中国的法庭上。我说，这不可能，因为中国共产党正在找我。我不能回中国。\n\n然后他们回来，说，姐姐，他们要你拿着护照和你的、类似声明的东西录制一段视频，说，好，我愿意和我丈夫离婚。我告诉我弟弟，不会以这种方式发生，因为中国共产党已经伪造了我的许多视频和声音。如果我曾录制这段视频，并在镜头前说我愿意和我丈夫离婚，那么有一天——我儿子现在六岁。他会长大，他会成年，而那段视频将被中国共产党伪造和使用。\n\n王——原告方证人——由瑟尔斯交叉询问\n\n一次又一次，又一次，用于那些话。我不能有一天让我的儿子站在我面前问我，妈妈，是你放弃了我，抛弃了我。\n\n法院：好的。够了。\n\n证人：对不起。\n\n法院：那不是对该问题的回答。\n\n证人：对不起，对不起。对不起。对不起，法官阁下。\n\n问：好的。我们稍微换个话题，好吗？\n\n那么，你说你自何时起一直在 New York City（纽约市）为郭氏家族工作？\n\n答：对。不对。我自 2009 年起为郭氏家族工作，自 April 23rd 起，我来到美国，继续为郭氏家族和郭先生本人工作。\n\n问：你目前是 Golden Spring New York（黄金泉纽约）的总裁，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 为郭氏家族做什么？\n\n答：自我接管以来，Golden Spring New York 恢复了运营，那是在 2018 年初。在那之前，Golden Spring New York 的雇员要么离开，要么辞职，要么失踪。因此，我必须处理许多遗留问题；自从我开始为 Golden Spring New York 工作以来，我使其成为，或者我界定，我界定 Golden Spring New York 为郭氏家族的家族办公室，因此我开始收集一切并进行运营。\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——法庭正式记录员\n\n纽约县书记官办公室提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM，索引号 652077/2017，NYSCEF 文件编号 331，NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019，案号 22-50073，文件 404-17，提交日期 05/20/22，登记日期 05/20/22 11:52:18，第 53 页，共 126 页\n\n王——原告方证人——由瑟尔斯交叉询问\n\n问：因此，在你的职责中，你收集文件并运营该实体？\n\n答：对。是的。\n\n问：你为郭氏家族承担的其他职责有哪些？\n\n答：对不起。你的问题是什么？\n\n问：作为总裁，你为 Golden Spring、为郭氏家族承担的其他职责有哪些？\n\n答：其他职责包括，例如组建团队；以及协助所有诉讼；协助收集文件和信息；以及协助进行日常运营，每一天。\n\n问：所以，当你说日常运营时，你是指确保每个人的账单都按时支付，确保其他人都知道他们应当做什么吗？\n\n答：对。因为许多，例如正如我所说，我以前的同事都消失了、离开了，所以有许多未解决的问题、账单和事项；当我加入并开始为 Golden Spring 工作时，几乎一切都回到了正轨，因此我可以看到这一点，我为此感到自豪。\n\n问：你今天上午已在此作了相当多的证言。\n\n由Wang（王）代表原告——由Searles（瑟尔斯）交叉询问\n\n问：关于“个人知情”这一概念，我相信您使用的不同术语是“收集得来的知情”。您认为这两者之间是否存在区别？\n\n法庭：我理解其中的区别。\n\nSEARLES女士：好的。\n\n问：我想您面前可能有该文件，如需查阅，它是证物34，即尚未被采纳为证据的宣誓书。在向法庭提交该宣誓书之前，您是否收集了构成附件一部分的基础文件？\n\n答：是的。所有附件均属于我收集的文件。\n\n问：在提交该宣誓书之前，您是否审阅、查看并阅读过这些文件？\n\n答：我没有审阅所有文件，因为第一，我收集了很多文件。第二，如我所说，英语是我的第三语言，所以如果您听我说话，也许会觉得我英语说得还不错；但当您让我阅读所有这些非常法律性或正式性的文件时，我无法很快理解它们，我必须查字典，并试图弄明白它们在谈论什么。\n\n问：在提交您的宣誓书之前，您是否曾与他人讨论过这些文件，亦即与Golden Spring（黄金泉）或Guo Family（郭氏家族）组织内的其他人讨论过这些文件？\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\n由Wang代表原告——由Searles交叉询问\n\n答：我从他们那里收集这些文件。\n\n问：您也与其他人讨论过这些文件吗？\n\nMOSS先生：异议。诱导性提问。\n\n答：是。\n\nSEARLES女士：她不是我的证人。\n\n法庭：她是一名敌对证人。\n\n法庭：听着，我的理解是，这名证人对任何事情均无个人知情。她收集了大量信息，其中一些、大部分或……她理解了；而她签署的宣誓书，是基于她的理解，即在其语言障碍限制下，对律师放在她面前让她签署的内容的理解。关于她的证言，还有什么我需要知道的吗？\n\nSEARLES女士：我只想请您看一下其中第一段，该段谈到个人知情的问题。该段实际上并未说明它是基于个人知情，对吗？\n\n答：您的意思是——\n\n问：您的宣誓书的第一段。\n\n答：第一段。\n\n问：是的。该文件中并不存在“基于我的个人知情”这一措辞，对吗？\n\n法庭：好的。\n\n答：对。抱歉。\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n由Wang代表原告——由Searles交叉询问\n\n证人：抱歉。抱歉，法官阁下。\n\nSEARLES女士：法官阁下，我现在转换话题，以便明确。\n\n问：本次听证中所涉的公寓，是否已经出售？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：据您所知，该公寓现在是否甚至已挂牌出售？\n\n答：对。我对此有个人知情。\n\n问：而您的这一知情，是指它已挂牌还是未挂牌？\n\n答：它根本没有挂牌出售。\n\nSEARLES女士：法官阁下，我想就这些。\n\nMOSS先生：法官阁下，还有一个问题？\n\n法庭：可以。\n\n再直接询问\n\n由MOSS先生进行：\n\n问：该公寓何时撤下市场？\n\n答：大约一个月。大约从现在起一个月前撤下市场。大约一个月前。\n\nMOSS先生：我没有其他问题。\n\n法庭：好的。您可以离席。\n\n（随后，该证人获准离开证人席。）\n\n法庭：下一位证人。\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n56　Wang——代表原告——由Moss（莫斯）再直接询问\n\n（随后，诉讼程序暂停。）\n\n法庭：你们找到证人后，告知我。\n\n（随后，休庭。）\n\n* * * * * * *\n\nMICHAEL ULLMAN（迈克尔·厄尔曼）经书记员依法宣誓后，接受询问并作如下证言：\n\n书记员：请以响亮清晰的声音说出您的全名和地址。\n\n证人：Michael Ullman，340 West 57th Street，apartment BG，New York，New York 10019。\n\n书记员：请坐。\n\n直接询问\n\n由SARNOFF先生进行：\n\n问：早上好，Ullman先生。我们的进度稍有落后，所以我会尽量加快。\n\n问：先生，您有受雇工作吗？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：受谁雇用？\n\n答：Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-尼德兰酒店）。\n\n问：您在那里的职位是什么？\n\n答：我的职务是执行副总裁、首席运营官。\n\n问：这实际上相当于——\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF文件编号331　NYSCEF收到日期：05/08/2019\n\n由Ullman代表原告——由Sarnoff（萨诺夫）直接询问\n\n答：是的。\n\n问：您担任该职位多久了？\n\n答：在Sherry-Netherland吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：九年。\n\n问：所以大约自2010年起？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：您从事酒店管理行业多久了？\n\n答：略超过　年。\n\n问：作为总经理职务、首席运营官兼总经理职务，您是否参与新的购买申请程序？\n\n答：我参与整理文件，确保在将其送交董事会成员之前，一切文件齐备。\n\n问：在您任职Sherry-Netherland期间，您大约参与了多少宗公寓交易，即购买和出售？\n\n答：60宗。\n\n问：Sherry-Netherland是否设有董事会？\n\n答：是的。\n\n问：它是否设有总裁或主席？\n\n答：设有一位总裁。\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n纽约县书记官于05/08/2019 02:34 PM提交　案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF文件编号331　NYSCEF收到日期：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　于05/20/22提交　于05/20/22 11:52:18录入　第59页\n\n由Ullman代表原告——由Sarnoff直接询问\n\n问：总裁是谁？\n\n答：Michael Horvitz（迈克尔·霍维茨）。\n\n问：自Kwok先生于2015年购买以来，他一直担任总裁吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Horvitz先生大体上有何背景？\n\n答：他曾是Jones Day（众达律师事务所）的合伙人，担任律师职务。他是Frick（弗里克）的受托人；我认为，他是Cleveland Clinic（克利夫兰诊所）的受托人，并曾任IMG International Management（IMG国际管理公司）董事长。\n\n问：Sherry-Netherland的董事会是否负责审查和批准公寓购买申请？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能否大致说明批准程序？\n\n答：不必极其详细，只是为了让法庭有一个概念。是这样的，会有出售和购买经纪人，他们带来客户。房产挂牌出售。他们带来客户，就价格和条款达成一致。他们审阅楼宇董事会会议记录及楼宇状况。然后他们来找我们索取一份材料清单，即该材料中需要什么。他们准备好那份董事会材料，材料全部准备妥当后，便提交给我们。\n\n问：其中包含何种类型的信息？\n\n法庭：我对此非常了解。我曾任纽约市合作公寓主席　年。\n\n由Ullman代表原告——由Sarnoff直接询问\n\nSARNOFF先生：已注意到。\n\n法庭：我们可以略过这一部分。\n\n问：您知道Kwok Ho Wan（郭文贵），或者Miles Kwok（郭文贵）是谁吗？\n\n答：知道。\n\n问：是否曾有一段时间，他申请购买Sherry-Netherland的一套公寓？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您大致记得是在何时吗？\n\n答：是在2015年初。我相信是2015年2月。\n\n问：Kwok先生是否经历了通常的申请程序？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：他是否向董事会提供了财务信息？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您大致记得他提供了何种财务信息吗？\n\n答：他第一次提供的信息——我只是后来才看到——是保密的。它被放在一个文件夹内，我把它交给了董事会主席；我相信那是以人民币计价、主要以中文写成的文件，因此那是最初发送的文件。董事会就此开会，随后要求提供更详细的美元财务信息。\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n案号：652077/2017\n纽约县书记官于05/08/2019 02:34 PM提交\n案件22-50073　文件404-17　于05/20/22提交　于05/20/22 11:52:18录入　第61页\n\nNYSCEF文件编号331　NYSCEF收到日期：05/08/2019\n\n由Ullman代表原告——由Sarnoff直接询问\n\n问：在您提交该申请信息时，您是否理解他声称拥有或控制该等信息？\n\nHARMON先生：异议，法官阁下。其理解无关紧要。文件本身已说明一切。它们均已作为证据提交。\n\n法庭：异议成立。\n\n问：Kwok先生是否向Sherry-Netherland出示了任何有关其声称在美国持有的资产的信息？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：他是否向Sherry-Netherland提供了任何其声称以本人名义持有的资产？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否记得任何其他潜在的Sherry-Netherland购买人，既未出示以其本人名义持有的资产，也未出示在美国持有的资产？\n\n答：没有。\n\nHARMON先生：异议，法官阁下。\n\n问：那么，是否可以说——\n\n法庭：已有异议。\n\n法庭：那与任何事项有何关联？\n\nSARNOFF先生：其申请的独特性，以及Sherry-Netherland是否认为有必要，鉴于全部……\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n纽约县书记官于05/08/2019 02:34 PM提交　案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF文件编号331　NYSCEF收到日期：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　于05/20/22提交　于05/20/22 11:52:18录入　第62页，共126页\n\n由Ullman代表原告——由Sarnoff直接询问\n\n法庭：你可以问他Sherry-Netherland做了什么，但他们批准了该项购买。\n\nSARNOFF先生：好的。\n\n问：不包括Kwok先生，在您任职Sherry-Netherland期间，是否有任何住户曾使用双层有限责任公司（LLC）架构购买公寓？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：不包括Kwok先生，是否有任何住户曾使用外国有限责任公司架构购买公寓？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您刚才提到，他没有出示任何美国资产。Sherry-Netherland是否因此对其购买施加了任何特别条件或保障措施？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您记得那些保障措施是什么吗？\n\n答：有一笔保证金，涵盖五年期间的预估维护费。\n\n问：您记得保证金金额是多少吗？\n\n答：约为$3.3 million。\n\n问：您是否记得是否还要求Kwok先生签署一份居住协议？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：是否还要求他亲自保证——\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n62 乌尔曼（Ullman）——代表原告——由萨诺夫（Sarnoff）直接询问\n\n问：专有租赁协议？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：保证金的数额是如何确定的？\n\n答：该数额是由董事会召开会议确定的，我相信实际上——\n\n哈蒙（Harmon）先生：反对。该证人不具有个人知情；他只是在陈述董事会做了什么。而且无关，法官大人。除非他是在就——作证。\n\n法庭：听着，别吹毛求疵。我甚至不确定这些证言有何关联性。继续。回答。\n\n答：当时是——我参加了董事会会议，我相信实际上在此之前，处理郭文贵先生购买事宜的律师事务所——我想是其中一家律所——提出了这一点；我相信郭文贵先生也提出了这一点，董事会讨论了适当的金额应是多少，然后他们认为五年足以涵盖；由于郭文贵先生在美国没有资产，如果他不支付管理费，我们就有足够的保障来保护自己。\n\n问：在转换话题之前，您是否记得有关郭文贵先生申请和成交时间线的任何事情？\n\n答：记得。\n\n问：郭文贵先生是否对该程序施加了任何时间限制？\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 404-17 于 05/20/22 提交，于 05/20/22 11:52:18 登记，第 63 页，共 126 页\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 404-17 于 05/20/22 提交，于 05/20/22 11:52:18 登记，第 64 页，共 126 页\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问　63\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能向我们说明一下吗？\n\n答：我相信这始于二月，并且必须在3月6日之前成交。我回看了笔记，我想必须在3月6日之前成交，否则他可以取消合同；根据我所记得听到的情况，我的理解是，因风水方面的原因，必须成交。\n\n问：这种时间安排——这种时间安排对于谢里-尼德兰（Sherry-Netherland）的申请而言是否典型？\n\n哈蒙先生：反对，法官大人。这与什么有关？\n\n法庭：这与任何事情都无关，不过继续。并不典型。好的。下一个。\n\n问：是否有任何潜在买方曾要求在如此短的时间内成交？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：郭文贵先生成交并入住后，是否曾有一段时间他寻求动用其保证金？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：您大致记得那是什么时候吗？\n\n答：在成交后一年内。\n\n问：您大致记得吗，在您所说的$3.3 million保证金中，他想动用多少？\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\n64 乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：我相信大约是2.3 million。\n\n问：据您所知，谢里-尼德兰是否同意了该请求？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否有其他公寓买方在购买谢里-尼德兰公寓后不久，曾寻求提取其保证金？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否曾有一段时间，郭文贵先生或代表其行事的人询问过转让该公寓的所有权？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：您记得什么？\n\n答：我记得，首先是他的经纪人凯茜·斯隆（Kathy Sloane）走近我并说，他们能否将公寓转到其儿子迈尔森·郭（Mileson Kwok）名下。\n\n问：是转到他本人名下，还是为其名下的信托？\n\n答：当时他们没有说信托。他们只是说想将其转给迈尔森。\n\n问：迈尔森是郭文贵先生的儿子，对吗？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：后来您是否得知，该请求是将其转让给为郭文贵先生儿子设立的信托？\n\n答：是的，当我收到来自英格兰一名律师——我相信是一位曼尼斯（Mannis）女士——的信函时，该信函询问他们可以如何进行转让。\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 404-17 于 05/20/22 提交，于 05/20/22 11:52:18 登记，第 66 页，共 126 页\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问\n\n问：该请求是如何设立一项从郭文贵先生向郭文贵先生儿子转让的安排？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：为郭文贵先生儿子设立的信托？\n\n答：是，正确。\n\n问：谢里-尼德兰是否回应了该请求？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：谢里-尼德兰是如何回应的？\n\n答：我们告诉他们可以如何完成，即他的儿子必须经过申请程序，并提供郭文贵先生在购买该公寓时所提供的全部文件，然后他们可以经过该程序。\n\n问：因此，这是重新获得董事会批准的程序？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：这与董事会在此类情形下的标准做法一致？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：郭文贵先生最终是否提交了转让申请？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在随后期间，他或其代表是否就该公寓提出任何其他请求？\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\n\n66 乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：据我记得，没有。\n\n问：那么，后来是否有一段时间，郭文贵先生询问过将其儿子作为联系人？\n\n答：有。\n\n哈蒙先生：反对。诱导性提问。他已经回答了问题，说没有提出其他请求。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\n哈蒙先生：诱导性提问。证人已经回答郭文贵先生没有提出其他请求。现在他正诱导证人作出不同的回答。\n\n萨诺夫先生：我可以向证人出示其证言笔录以刷新其记忆，如果您愿意的话。\n\n哈蒙先生：证言笔录并不是他所问问题的答案。\n\n答：我记得郭文贵先生的一名代表询问，他们能否更换联系人，能否将其儿子作为联系人。\n\n问：这紧接着是请求将所有权转让给其儿子、为其儿子设立的信托，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 404-17 于 05/20/22 提交，于 05/20/22 11:52:18 登记，第 68 页，共\n\n67 乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问\n\n法庭：您所说的联系人是什么意思？\n\n证人：在该公寓中，他们有联系人。他们有行政人员，如果我们需要联系他们，就应通过这些人联系。有几名不同的人，然后他们询问能否将其改为其儿子。\n\n法庭：好的。\n\n问：您是否认为郭文贵先生这样做可能试图达到什么目的？\n\n哈蒙先生：反对，法官大人。再次强调，他的看法无关。\n\n法庭：我同意。反对成立。\n\n问：郭文贵先生购买该公寓时，他和杰尼弗（Genever）是否与该楼宇签署了任何协议？\n\n答：除入住协议、保证金和——入住、保证金及个人担保外，那是三份文件，此外还签署了专有租赁协议。\n\n问：谢里-尼德兰也签署了专有租赁协议？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：郭文贵先生亲自签署了入住协议，对吗？\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n68 乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：我相信正确，是。\n\n问：那是与谢里-尼德兰签订的协议，该文件为英文，郭文贵先生签署了该文件，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您是否记得专有租赁协议和入住协议的作用，以及您是否可以质押您的公寓？\n\n哈蒙先生：反对，法官大人。相关性。郭文贵先生的行为是否违反专有租赁协议，并非本诉讼的争议事项。我不理解。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\n哈蒙先生：郭文贵先生以其本人名义购买了该公寓。\n\n法庭：是。\n\n哈蒙先生：他签署了专有租赁协议。\n\n法庭：是。\n\n哈蒙先生：他签署了入住协议。他签署了个人担保。谢里-尼德兰的规则规定，您不得质押该公寓。郭文贵先生质押了该公寓。您是否得知此事？\n\n证人：后来得知，是。\n\n法庭：好的。\n\n问：您是如何得知此事的？\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 404-17 于 05/20/22 提交，于 05/20/22 11:52:18 登记，第 69 页，共 126 页\n\n案号：652077/2017\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案件 22-50073\n文件 404-17\n于 05/20/22 提交\n于 05/20/22 11:52:18 登记\n第 70 页，共\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：在我们收到奥梅尔文尼（O'Melveny）送达的文件时，这是我们首次得知此事；我们阅读该文件后得知，该公寓已被质押。\n\n问：您看到的文件是郭文贵先生签署的文件，也是其律师提交的文件，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：请您注意PX 33。\n\n（随即向法庭出示一份证物。）\n\n答：好的。\n\n哈蒙先生：我的材料中没有PX。那是贵所提供的吗？\n\n萨诺夫先生：那是你们的诉状。\n\n（随即向证人递交一份文件。）\n\n问：请您注意第四页。\n\n哈蒙先生：法官大人，该法律备忘录尚未作为证据提交。他不能从一份未作为证据提交的文件中宣读，而且他不能认证该文件。\n\n法庭：我没有第33号证物。\n\n霍普拉马齐安（Hoplamazian）先生：法官大人，我们也有一份副本给您。\n\n（随即向法庭递交一份文件。）\n\n70 乌尔曼——代表原告——由萨诺夫直接询问\n\n法庭：我们不会就法律备忘录提问。继续。\n\n萨诺夫先生：好的。\n\n问：您是否理解，在本案中，郭文贵先生通过其诉状向法庭陈述该公寓已被质押？\n\n哈蒙先生：反对，法官大人。基于多项理由。\n\n法庭：反对成立。成立，成立。\n\n萨诺夫先生：我可以就此陈述吗？\n\n法庭：听着，我们已经确定，郭文贵先生购买了该公寓，并且违反其专有租赁协议质押了该公寓；我们也已经确定，该证人在后来的某一时期得知此事，并且已达成约定，至少截至一个月前，该公寓已不再被质押。\n\n问：您是否通知郭文贵先生，其公寓被质押违反了谢里-尼德兰协议？\n\n答：是。\n\n法庭：您何时这样做？\n\n证人：在我们发现该公寓已被质押后不久。\n\n法庭：好的。那是什么时候？\n\n证人：我现在只能猜测，大约在——\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 404-17 于 05/20/22 提交，于 05/20/22 11:52:18 登记，第 72 页，共\n\n厄尔曼（Ullman）——代表原告——由萨尔诺夫（Sarnoff）直接询问 第71页\n\n问　法庭：不要猜测。不要猜测。\n证人：——2017年年中。\n法庭：2017年是你的回答吗？\n证人：是。\n法庭：好的。你是否收到了郭先生或郭先生律师——就该信函作出的答复？\n答　是。\n问　他们如何答复？\n哈蒙（Harmon）律师：反对，法官阁下。如果答复是书面的，则必须提交该文件，而且我认为整个——\n法庭：抱歉？\n哈蒙律师：如果我们以书面形式作出了答复，那么应当出示该证物、该文件，而不是他的证言。我反对该文件，因为他就此事项向谢里-内瑟兰（Sherry-Netherland）作出的答复，与我们今天在此审理的事项毫无关联。\n萨尔诺夫律师：阁下，我将向您出示该证物。这是第35号证物。\n（随即，一份文件被递交给证人。）\n哈蒙律师：法官阁下——\n莉萨·A·凯西（Lisa A. Casey）——官方法庭书记员\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由萨尔诺夫直接询问 第72页\n\n萨尔诺夫律师：我希望标记第35号证物。这是否是谢里-内瑟兰，特别是您，就您致谢里-内瑟兰、告知其该不当质押的信函所收到的书面答复副本？\n答　是。\n问　该信函就是否——作何说明？\n法庭：该信函——\n哈蒙律师：反对。\n法庭：你是否申请将其作为证据提交？\n萨尔诺夫律师：是。\n法庭：好的。该文件予以接收。其内容不言自明。\n萨尔诺夫律师：好的。\n问　而你的理解是，谢里-内瑟兰正被郭先生的律师告知——\n法庭：我能阅读。\n哈蒙律师：反对。\n法庭：我能阅读该信函。\n萨尔诺夫律师：好的。可以。\n法庭：该文件已作为证据提交。\n萨尔诺夫律师：好的。你能否将郭先生律师向谢里-内瑟兰作出的答复，与郭先生的书面陈述及王（Wang）宣誓书就该事项所采取的立场相协调？\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由萨尔诺夫直接询问 第73页\n\n法庭：反对成立。反对成立。\n哈蒙律师：谢谢。\n问　我很快结束。你是否对郭先生怀有私怨？\n答　绝对没有。\n问　他不是起诉过你吗？\n答　是的。\n问　这是否对你的证言有任何影响？\n答　绝对没有。\n问　你今天来这里的目的，是否是为了帮助PAX LP（PAX有限合伙企业）赢得其动议？\n答　不是。\n问　你是自愿来此作证，还是被传唤？\n答　被传唤。\n问　你的证言录取也是如此吗？\n答　是。\n问　你和我是否就你的证言事先进行过沟通？\n答　没有。\n问　你今天是否如实作证？\n答　是。\n问　让我看看能否概括一下你的证言。\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n索引号 652077/2017\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\nCase 22-50073\nDoc 404-17\nFiled 05/20/22\nEntered 05/20/22 11:52:18\nPage 75 of\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由萨尔诺夫直接询问\n\n问　简要地说。我还有一个最终问题想问你，请你告诉我是否有任何地方我说错了。你证称，他没有显示任何美国资产，或以其本人名义持有的资产；正确吗？\n哈蒙律师：反对，法官阁下。这只是概括已载入记录的证言。这是诱导性提问，它——\n法庭：反对成立。我已经听过他的证言。\n萨尔诺夫律师：好的。\n法庭：我不需要对其进行概括。你还有其他问题吗？\n问　你是否认为郭先生就其公寓所作的行为是典型的？\n哈蒙律师：反对。\n法庭：反对成立。\n问　你是否曾就郭先生可能试图通过该公寓实现什么目的形成过看法？\n哈蒙律师：反对。\n法庭：反对也成立。谢谢你，厄尔曼先生。\n萨尔诺夫律师：我保留任何问题，待复直接询问时提出。\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问 第75页\n\n交叉询问\n\n由哈蒙律师进行：\n\n问　下午好，厄尔曼先生。\n答　下午好。\n问　我是马克·哈蒙（Mark Harmon）。我们此前未曾见过。我代表郭先生。\n问　厄尔曼先生，你是否会说郭先生的英语不太好？\n答　我——是的。\n问　尤其是几年前，他的英语不好。\n答　可能后来有所改善，但当然——\n答　已经好很多了。\n法警：请让问题说完。\n证人：是。\n问　在该公寓的出售合同将要签署时；正确吗？\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号 652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号 331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　Case 22-50073　Doc 404-17　Filed 05/20/22　Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18　Page 77 of 126\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问\n\n答　正确。\n问　原告方向你提供了一份该命令副本；正确吗？\n答　正确。\n问　因此，如果作为谢里-内瑟兰的执行副总裁兼首席运营官，你知道郭先生或Genever（杰尼弗）已签订出售合同，你会通知法庭吗？\n答　是。\n问　因为你会希望遵守该命令？\n答　当然。\n问　好的。现在，你还说，你收到了向你送达的文件，该文件表明郭先生已对该公寓设定质押；对吗？\n答　正确。\n问　厄尔曼先生，事实上，这些文件是在作出要求郭先生发出通知的命令之前交付给你的吗？\n答　我不知道该问题的答案。\n哈蒙律师：法官阁下，这将作为被告方证物。您希望我们从A开始，还是从被告方第1号开始？我带来了这些证物，但只需填写证物编号。\n法庭：第1号证物？\n哈蒙律师：被告方证物A还是第1号？\n哈蒙律师：其未预先标记。\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问 第77页\n\n哈蒙律师：我只是询问法官阁下，您倾向于我们如何处理。\n法庭：你递交了你的证物册吗？\n哈蒙律师：没有，法官阁下。我们有一本证物册，而这些仅用于交叉询问。这是——\n法庭：抱歉？\n哈蒙律师：没有，法官阁下。\n法庭：好的。那么我需要一份该证物副本。\n哈蒙律师：我将交给您。\n法庭：交给法警。\n哈蒙律师：我们将其定为被告方证物A。\n（随即，一份文件被递交给法庭。）\n哈蒙律师：法官阁下，我可以向证人递交一份副本吗？\n法庭：可以。\n哈蒙律师：谢谢。\n（随即，一份文件被递交给证人。）\n问　厄尔曼先生，你已收到标记为被告方证物A、供识别用的文件。你能告诉我们那是什么吗？\n答　那是我的助理发给艾拉·吉尔伯特（Ira Gilbert）并抄送给我的一封电子邮件，内容涉及——\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问 第78页\n\n问　那么，不要告诉我它涉及什么。该电子邮件是否附有附件？\n答　是。\n问　该附件是否是你签署的一封信函副本？\n答　那是我的签名。是。\n问　是以你作为谢里-内瑟兰执行副总裁兼首席运营官的官方身份签署的；正确吗？\n答　是。\n哈蒙律师：法官阁下，我申请将其作为被告方证物A提交证据。\n法庭：好的。予以接收。\n萨尔诺夫律师：不反对。\n问　现在，厄尔曼先生，请你看一下该信函的第一和第二段。那是该证物的第二页。\n答　是。\n问　你是否看到，该公司于June 29, 2018收到该命令的副本？\n答　是。\n问　而大约在两个月之前，原告方向你提供了有关他们与郭先生之间诉讼的文件副本；正确吗？\n126\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问 第79页\n\n答　是。\n问　因此，我先前问题的答案是，你是否在该命令作出之前收到了有关该质押的信息，答案是肯定的。\n答　是。\n问　而你是从原告方收到该信息的；正确吗？是从本案原告方收到的？\n答　是。\n问　我知道你就整理文件、汇集文件作了相当多的证言。我推定，无论你从郭先生或代表郭先生的人士处收到何种财务信息，你都交给了董事会。\n答　正确。\n问　可以说，没有任何交给你的信息未被你交给董事会；对吗？\n答　正确。\n问　然后董事会审查了该信息？\n答　正确。\n问　随后，董事会表决是否接受郭先生成为谢里-内瑟兰的公寓所有人？\n答　正确。\n问　董事会第一次表决时认定该信息不足；对吗？\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号 652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号 331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　Case 22-50073　Doc 404-17　Filed 05/20/22　Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18　Page 81 of 126\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问 第80页\n\n答　正确。\n问　并要求提供额外信息？\n答　正确。\n问　并提供了额外信息？\n答　正确。\n问　董事会收到了该信息？\n答　是。\n问　董事会进行了表决？\n答　是。\n问　董事会批准了？\n答　是。\n问　董事会知道郭先生为获得批准设定了有限的期限；正确吗？\n答　是。\n问　他们表决批准其成为住户？\n答　是。\n问　因此，他们知道他没有美国资产；正确吗？\n答　是。\n问　他们知道他没有以其本人名义持有的资产；正确吗？\n答　是。\n问　他们批准他成为合作公寓业主？\n答　是。\n问　他们要求支付保证金？\n答　是。\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问 第81页\n\n问　郭先生支付了保证金？\n答　是。\n问　截至今日，有多少保证金被用于支付其物业维护费？\n答　没有。\n问　那么，郭先生从其手中购买该公寓的人，你知道该公寓是以何种形式持有的吗？你知道所有人是谁吗？\n答　是。\n问　所有人是谁？\n答　是吉尔伯特·哈罗什（Gilbert Haroche），我相信是由一家LLC持有。\n问　因此，该公寓是从通过一家LLC持有该公寓的人手中购买的；正确吗？\n答　是。\n问　霍维茨先生（Mr. Horvitz）以何种身份拥有其公寓？他不是通过一个信托拥有该公寓吗？\n答　我一时不知道该问题的答案。\n问　谢里有许多人通过实体持有其公寓；正确吗？\n答　是。\n问　谢里知道郭先生正通过一个实体购买该公寓；正确吗？\n答　是。\n问　他们批准了？\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问\n\n答　是。\n问　现在，你说曾有一段时间，郭先生或代表他的人询问将该公寓转让给其儿子一事？\n答　是。\n问　好的。因此，那是一项询问，即我们该如何办理；正确吗？\n答　是。\n问　谢里-内瑟兰作出了答复。你告诉郭先生，如果他想这么做，应当如何办理；正确吗？\n答　正确。\n问　而他没有这么做。\n答　正确。\n问　因此，此事最终没有任何结果？\n答　正确。\n问　你还说，某时米尔森（Mileson），即郭先生的儿子，想成为联络人？\n答　正确。\n问　现在谁是联络人？\n答　我通常使用的联络人是布伦达（Brenda）。我想她姓曾（Tsang）。\n问　不是郭先生？\n答　不是。\n问　因为布伦达英语说得很好；正确吗？\n莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——由哈蒙交叉询问\n\n答：布伦达（Brenda）英语说得很好，而且我获悉她负责管理该公寓；如果我需要与某人联系，我就与她联系。\n\n问：您是否曾与郭先生的儿子迈尔森（Mileson）交谈过？\n\n答：只是寒暄。\n\n问：只是寒暄。您与他交谈时，他的英语怎么样？\n\n答：如我所说，我没有与他长时间交谈过。他的英语似乎很好。\n\n问：他住在伦敦，不是吗？\n\n答：据我所知，是的。\n\n问：他的英语似乎很好？\n\n答：我会说他的英语很流利。\n\n问：他很流利。好的。\n\n哈蒙先生（Mr. Harmon）：法官阁下，我可以稍等片刻吗？\n\n我认为可能就这些了。\n\n（至此，诉讼程序暂停。）\n\n哈蒙先生：还有一件事。\n\n问：还有一件事。您是否出席了第二次董事会会议，即批准郭先生购房申请的那次董事会会议？\n\n答：我相信那是一次电话董事会会议，是的。我参加了电话会议。\n\n问：在那次董事会会议上，霍维茨先生（Mr. Horvitz）是否就某人为支持郭先生的申请而作出的个人推荐作了陈述？\n\n答：是的。\n\n问：那个人是一名在台湾的建筑师？\n\n答：台湾或香港。我不记得了。\n\n问：那个人是霍维茨先生认识的人？\n\n答：我相信是这样。\n\n问：那个人为郭先生作了担保？\n\n答：高度担保。\n\n问：高度担保。而且，在审批过程中提交的其他文件中，有推荐信，不是吗？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：其中一封推荐信是由英国前首相托尼·布莱尔（Tony Blair）出具的，对吗？\n\n答：是的，正确。\n\n问：谢谢。\n\n哈蒙先生：我没有其他问题了。\n\n萨诺夫先生（Mr. Sarnoff）复询问\n\n问：霍维茨先生，我只有两个后续问题。\n\n答：不，我不是霍维茨先生。我是厄尔曼先生（Mr. Ullman）。抱歉。\n\n法庭：抱歉，您说什么？\n\n萨诺夫先生：我说的是霍维茨先生。是我的错误。\n\n问：哈蒙先生问过您，其他购房人是否使用LLC（有限责任公司）购买他们的公寓。为明确起见，没有人使用双重LLC，也没有人使用外国LLC。这么说公平吗？\n\n答：公平。\n\n问：哈蒙先生问过您，您是否明白，如果郭先生订立出售其公寓的合同，谢里-内瑟兰（Sherry-Netherland）将会收到通知；正确吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：但是，如果郭先生转让作为最终所有人的外国LLC的所有权，谢里-内瑟兰是否必然会收到该事项的通知？\n\n答：我们应当收到通知。\n\n问：但按照目前的安排，如果郭先生没有告诉您，而自行去做了该事，您会收到通知吗？那不是通过该大楼发生的事情，不是吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n法庭：我不明白。谢里-内瑟兰的一套公寓未经谢里-内瑟兰董事会批准，不能转让；正确吗？\n\n法庭记录员莉萨·A·凯西（Lisa A. Casey）——官方法庭记录员\n\n案号：652077/2017\n纽约县书记员办公室提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n\nNYSCEF文件编号331　案件22-50073\n文件404-17　提交于05/20/22\n登记于05/20/22 11:52:18　第87页，共126页\nNYSCEF收到：05/08/2019\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫复询问\n\n证人：正确。\n\n法庭：因此，如果该公寓的所有人寻求转让该公寓的所有权，则未经谢里-内瑟兰批准，该转让无法完成。\n\n证人：正确。\n\n法庭：那么，对刚才最后一个问题的回答是什么？\n\n证人：我——\n\n问：我可以吗？\n\n答：可以。请说。\n\n问：所有权结构是，拥有该公寓的纽约LLC由一个B.V.I. LLC（英属维尔京群岛有限责任公司）所有，而该B.V.I. LLC拥有该纽约公寓；郭先生是最终受益所有人。\n\n我所问的是，如果郭先生将B.V.I. LLC的所有权转让给其他方，董事会不一定会知道。这不会涉及新的买卖协议；他可以将LLC所有权转让给第三方，使其不再归他所有，即使谢里-内瑟兰董事会没有就该公寓订立新的买卖合同。那就是——\n\n法庭：我认为那不是证人的证言。\n\n法庭记录员莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭记录员\n\n厄尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫复询问\n\n哈蒙先生：不是。\n\n答：请回头再问我一遍这个问题。\n\n问：如果纽约的LLC出售该房产，您会参与其中；正确吗？\n\n答：如果由郭先生控制的LLC出售该公寓，就会有一项买卖交易。是的。\n\n问：但是，如果公寓并未涉及买卖，而外国LLC涉及一项转让，这不一定会引起您的注意，不是吗？\n\n答：不会。\n\n法庭：但那不会具有约束力。公寓不得转让。\n\n证人：嗯，从法律上说——\n\n法庭：据您所知，未经董事会批准，谢里-内瑟兰的任何单元均不得转让给任何人。\n\n证人：正确。\n\n哈蒙先生：我可以就此问几个问题吗？\n\n法庭：我认为我确实明白这一点。没那么复杂。继续。问您的问题。\n\n哈蒙先生：谢谢。我会非常简短。\n\n问：厄尔曼先生，当有人在谢里-内瑟兰购买一套公寓时，他们会获发一张股票证书；正确吗？\n\n法庭记录员莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭记录员\n\n纽约县书记员办公室提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF文件编号331　NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交于05/20/22　登记于05/20/22 11:52:18　第89页，共126页\n\n88　厄尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫复询问\n\n答：是的。\n\n问：谢里-内瑟兰保存有关该股票证书所有人的记录？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：为了将该股票证书转让至另一个人的名下并重新登记，必须经谢里-内瑟兰批准。\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：因此，如果有人向您出示一张登记在某人名下、后转让给他人的股票证书，谢里-内瑟兰会拒绝该证书；不是吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：而且，谢里-内瑟兰不会向该人出具专有租约；正确吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：因此，就您而言，谢里-内瑟兰认定吉尼弗（Genever）为所有人，且吉尼弗持有专有租约；这是谢里的立场，正确吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n哈蒙先生：谢谢。\n\n法庭：好的。下一位证人。\n\n（至此，证人离开证人席。）\n\n法庭记录员莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭记录员\n\n诉讼程序\n\n哈蒙先生：法官阁下，我不想抢话，但我认为下一位证人是播放霍维茨先生视频证词的呈现。或许我们可以节省一些时间，如果我们提交原告和我们已就各部分提出异议标记的笔录，由法官阁下阅读该笔录，这样我们就不必再占用您的时间——\n\n法庭：不，不，不，不，不。我希望在此时此地听完整个案件。\n\n哈蒙先生：好的。\n\n法庭：我不想回去开始阅读各种材料和异议。\n\n哈蒙先生：可以。\n\n西尔斯女士（Ms. Searles）：我只是有一个澄清问题，因为我们此前没有讨论过这个问题。我们作出了指定和交叉指定，并且对某些选定部分提出了异议。我想问您的是，您是否纳入了您未提出异议的交叉指定，还是交叉指定？这是否属于该视频呈现的一部分？\n\n莫斯先生（Mr. Moss）：我们纳入了您的全部交叉指定。\n\n西尔斯女士：好的。您也纳入了您自己的全部——\n\n纽约县书记员办公室提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017\n案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交于05/20/22　登记于05/20/22 11:52:18　第91页，共126页\n\nNYSCEF文件编号331　NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019　126\n\n诉讼程序\n\n西尔斯女士：——无论任何一方是否提出异议？\n\n莫斯先生：是的。\n\n西尔斯女士：好的。\n\n莫斯先生：是的。您交叉指定的所有内容都在这里，但我们并没有播放全部内容。法官阁下，这是迈克尔·霍维茨（Michael Horvitz）。您已经听说，迈克尔·霍维茨是谢里-内瑟兰的董事长兼总裁。当郭先生向董事会申请购买该公寓时，他提交了财务资料。霍维茨先生审阅了该财务资料，并基于该财务资料建议董事会批准该购买。首先，我只是想梳理一下他的部分证言，因为我认为，与视频相比，仅向您展示——会更有效率。\n\n法庭：我只想听证言。我不想要任何演示材料。我这里有双方当事人提交的两英尺高的纸质材料。\n\n莫斯先生：可以接受。\n\n法庭：这是一次证据听证会，所以只需提出证据。\n\n莫斯先生：好的。霍维茨先生的证言。\n\n法庭记录员莉萨·A·凯西——官方法庭记录员\n\n诉讼程序\n\n（播放录像带。）\n\n西尔斯女士：抱歉打断一下。我有些难以理解——我以为您说指定和交叉指定都在其中，但这不是——您没有按顺序播放吗？\n\n莫斯先生：没有。您反向指定的所有内容，我们都已纳入，但我们没有播放我们指定的全部内容。那会花45分钟。\n\n西尔斯女士：好的。\n\n莫斯先生：这是一段选定的片段；在我们播放您反向指定的内容时，我们也播放您的反向指定内容。\n\n西尔斯女士：好的。我唯一的问题是，我指定了相当多的内容，而我无法弄清楚您在这里播放的是哪一页。\n\n莫斯先生：好的。\n\n西尔斯女士：我的意思是，这显然是从当天中途开始的。\n\n莫斯先生：好的。我很乐意——页码和行号就在那儿。我很乐意给您——\n\n西尔斯女士：我看不到页码。我能看到行号。这可能就是我遇到的问题。\n\nNYSCEF文件编号331　NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019　126\n\n诉讼程序\n\n莫斯先生：好的。是第64、65和67页。\n\n法庭：听着，考虑到参与此案的律所质量，我有一点困惑。如果您要出示一份证词笔录，您就应按顺序出示您指定的所有内容，以及他们指定的所有内容。\n\n莫斯先生：是的。\n\n法庭：对于在证词录取时提出的异议，我将裁定您出示的部分能否作为证据采纳。\n\n莫斯先生：不完全是这样，法官阁下。我们双方都作了指定。播放我们指定的全部内容可能需要一个小时。我们只播放我们所指定内容中的一部分、时长10分钟的片段，因为播放全部内容会花费太长时间。\n\n萨诺夫先生：以及她指定的全部内容。\n\n莫斯先生：以及全部——\n\n哈蒙先生：为什么不提交笔录？\n\n西尔斯女士：我的理解是，他们打算提交他们最初指定的全部内容。\n\n莫斯先生：我们的理解是，所有已被指定的证言均已作为证据提交。\n\n法庭：听着，Horvitz先生（霍维茨先生）在 Sherry-Netherland（舍里-内瑟兰）那边，对吗？\n\nMoss先生（莫斯先生）：是。\n\n法庭：你本可以让他到这里来；对。\n\nMoss先生：哦，不。他住在 Cleveland（克利夫兰）。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\nMoss先生：他住在 Cleveland。他是董事会主席，但他长期居住在 Cleveland。\n\n法庭：好的。\n\nMoss先生：他无法出庭。\n\n法庭：所以他是州外证人。\n\nMoss先生：是。\n\n法庭：因此，你们是在播放他的证言笔录吗？\n\nMoss先生：正确。\n\n法庭：对于你们希望我看到的证言笔录部分应如何出示，你们是否已达成一致？\n\nMoss先生：嗯，我们的理解是，我们已作出指定，法官阁下也持有这些指定内容，因此，在不存在异议的范围内，那些内容将作为证据。我们今天只是准备播放其中的选段，因为播放全部内容又将花费一个小时。\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 95 of 126\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：我只会考虑在本庭向我出示的内容。\n\nMoss先生：好的。\n\n法庭：这就是我的规则。那么继续。\n\nSearles女士（希尔斯女士）：为了不必再次起身打断，我想明确说明，我们对即将提交的部分证词提出多项相关性异议。您是否希望我——\n\n法庭：嗯，如果这些异议未在证言笔录中提出——\n\nSearles女士：相关性不是证言笔录异议，所以——\n\n法庭：好。继续进行。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nHarmon先生（哈蒙先生）：异议，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\nHarmon先生：我提出异议。他正在概述更多尚未向您出示的证词。\n\n法庭：驳回异议。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nHarmon先生：异议，法官阁下。相关性。\n\n法庭：驳回该异议。\n\n庭审记录\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nHarmon先生：法官阁下，请原谅。法官阁下，在这样做时，他们删去了在该证词过程中提出的形式异议，因此您看不到，也听不到这些异议。\n\n法庭：听着，我可能遗漏了什么。我刚刚听到上一位证人作证称，该公寓由 Genever（吉内弗）所有，未经 Genever 批准，不得转让给 Genever 以外的任何人；因此，无论 Kwok先生（郭文贵先生）是否在其他情境下编造了一个荒唐故事，还是 Kwok先生在编造事实，这与谁拥有该公寓并无真正相关性。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nMoss先生：我们的下一位证人是——\n\n法庭：对于这份证言笔录，你们是否有交叉指定内容？\n\nSearles女士：有。我只是想简要说明两点。首先，我在证言笔录期间提出的异议已从录像中删去，因此至少有几项异议。\n\n法庭：好的。无论如何，我本会驳回所有异议。\n\nSearles女士：这没有问题。我只是想为记录作出该说明。\n\n庭审记录\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\nSearles女士：另一部分是，他表示这涉及指定内容和交叉指定内容。正如您所注意到的，其中没有交叉指定内容，因为他使用的证词部分并不包括我们作出交叉指定的部分，因此，我们所有的交叉指定均发生在这份证词的其他部分；但他是一名无法出庭的证人，所以我不认为它们在通常意义上属于为完整性而作出的交叉指定。我们只是指定了自己的部分。\n\n法庭：他大概有能力将你希望从证言笔录中出示的任何内容作为交叉询问提出——\n\nSearles女士：而且我对此表示抱歉——\n\nMoss先生：而且我们已经提出过这个安排。\n\n法庭：——作为交叉询问。\n\nMoss先生：我们事先已经提出过。\n\nSearles女士：不。我表示抱歉，因为当您表示这将会——\n\n法庭：我们不要争论谁对谁说了什么。如果你希望播放这份证言笔录的任何部分，你有权这样做；而且他会欣然配合你，播放你希望播放的任何证言笔录部分，如果有的话。\n\nSearles女士：好的。请给我一秒钟，法官阁下，因为若没有原告指定的实际部分，其中一些内容就没有多大意义。您面前有，您有那——\n\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）—正式法庭记录员\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：我不会阅读任何未向我出示的内容。\n\nSearles女士：好的。那我们就不再进行。谢谢。\n\n法庭：好的。下一位证人。\n\nMoss先生：我们传唤 Kwok先生。\n\n法庭：我们是否有 Kwok先生的口译员？\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 98 of 126\n\n书记员：正式法庭口译员，请登记出庭。\n\n口译员：普通话口译员，名字 Tor，T-O-R，姓氏 Huang，H-U-A-N-G。\n\n（随后，正式法庭普通话口译员由书记员依法宣誓。）\n\nKWOK HOWAN（郭文贵）经书记员依法宣誓后，在正式法庭普通话口译员协助下接受询问并作证如下。\n\n书记员：你是否宣誓或郑重声明，就提交法庭审理的一切事项如实作证？\n\n证人：嗯，我说，这是真的。\n\n书记员：请陈述你的姓名和地址。\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 99 of 126\n\n庭审记录\n\n证人：Kwok Ho Wan，K-W-O-K H-O-W-A-N。这是我的名字，我住在 Fifth Avenue（第五大道）。\n\n法警：请坐。\n\n法庭：好。我不想浪费太多时间。举行此次听证的原因，是让你们满足取得扣押命令的举证责任，其中一个要件是，被告为欺诈其债权人、阻挠执行可能作出有利于原告的判决，已经转让、处置、设定负担或隐匿财产，或将财产移出本州，或者即将实施上述任何行为。因此，如果位于 Sherry-Netherland 的这套公寓未经 Sherry-Netherland 同意绝不能转让，且 Sherry-Netherland 已知悉，如有任何出售该公寓的尝试，必须向你们提供事先通知，并且未经法庭批准不得转让，那么我认为我们无需对 Kwok先生进行长时间询问。\n\nMoss先生：嗯，法官阁下，鉴于这是我们今天第一次听到的新信息——\n\n法庭：抱歉。\n\nMoss先生：今天第一次听到的——\n\nLisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\n庭审记录\n\nMoss先生：情况。或许提前休庭午餐是合理的，以便我审阅、修改我的提纲，并鉴于这是您的看法，对 Kwok先生进行的询问比我原本打算进行的少得多。我很乐意现在开始，但我认为可以大幅精简。\n\n法庭：好。你现在想休庭午餐吗？这就是你告诉我的意思吗？\n\nMoss先生：我认为那样对所有人来说大概更不会浪费时间。\n\n法庭：好。因为我不希望你浪费你的时间和你当事人的钱，我也不希望你浪费我的时间。\n\nMoss先生：当然。\n\n法庭：下午两点在这里见。可以吗？\n\nMoss先生：当然，可以，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：Paul（保罗），你可以吗？\n\n书记员：可以。谢谢。\n\n法庭：法庭记录员可以吗？\n\n法庭记录员：可以。谢谢。\n\n法警：休庭至下午 2:00。\n\n（随后，休庭。）\n\nLisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\n庭审记录\n\n* * * * * *\n\n法庭：好。在本案中，原告是否拟就作为本案标的的保证继续进行？\n\nMoss先生：是，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：对于揭开公司面纱问题，原告的立场是什么？\n\nMoss先生：嗯，按照法官阁下的要求，我们已修改起诉状，将 Genever 实体列入。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\nMoss先生：我们已修改起诉状，将两个 Genever 实体列入；我们的立场是，我们在修改后的起诉状中陈述了足以提出揭开公司面纱请求的事实。\n\n法庭：好。但你们并不拟在本次听证中证明揭开公司面纱，是吗？\n\nMoss先生：是的，我们拟这样做，法官阁下。我们拟同时进行这两项。我们已按您的建议修改起诉状，而且正如我在开庭陈述中所述，揭开公司面纱是我们今天拟证明的事项之一。\n\nHarmon先生：法官阁下——\n\n法庭：就被告而言——\n\n提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF 文件编号：331　NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019　Case 22-50073 Doc 404-17 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 102 of 126\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：被告的立场是否是，Kwok先生基于向 Sherry-Netherland 提交的真实准确信息购买了其在 Sherry-Netherland 的住所？\n\nHarmon先生：提交给 Sherry-Netherland 的信息？\n\n法庭：抱歉。\n\nHarmon先生：您是在问，被告的立场是否是，向 Sherry-Netherland 提交的信息是真实准确的吗？\n\n法庭：是。\n\nHarmon先生：是。\n\n法庭：因此，你们也主张 Kwok先生在其证言笔录中作出的陈述是真实准确的？\n\nHarmon先生：是，法官阁下。在作出该陈述时是如此。\n\n法庭：是，法官阁下。你们还主张，Kwok先生在本诉讼启动后，曾无意中将该住所质押给另一实体；而当他意识到自己无权转让、质押该住所时，他安排解除该质押。\n\nHarmon先生：我认为我无法按照您提问的方式回答。该质押已被解除。我认为我无法回答您问题的其余部分，但我确实希望明确，法官阁下——\n\nLisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\n庭审记录\n\nHarmon先生：原告刚刚修改了其起诉状。就修改后的起诉状，争点尚未形成。我们尚未开始就该请求的实体问题进行证据开示。所有工作均针对扣押问题。因此，我的理解是——而且我在上一次口头辩论时提出过——一旦搁置关于是否应当作出扣押、或者法庭现有命令是否已为原告提供充分保护、以及原告是否满足扣押标准的问题，我们就会继续开始就实体问题进行证据开示；迄今为止，我们所进行的诉讼只是关于原告是否已证明其有权取得扣押，而不涉及除此以外的事项。不会就案件实体作出任何终局事实认定或法律结论，因为此时我们仅处理扣押问题。\n\n法庭：嗯，如果原告证明揭开公司面纱，这不会对法庭应考虑作出的命令产生某些影响吗？\n\n哈蒙先生（HARMON）：简短的回答当然是可以，但较长的回答是，我认为法院无需就是否25名原告已证明揭开公司面纱作出最终认定，即可决定是否适宜实施财产扣押。现阶段确定证明的标准不同于作出最终认定的标准，因此我会说，您就目前摆在您面前的问题所作出的任何裁定，均不构成对案件实体问题的最终裁定；在我们完成证据开示后，实体问题仍有待审理。为明确起见，法官阁下，鉴于法官阁下表述举行证据听证理由的方式，我们原本无意就揭开公司面纱问题作深入详尽的陈述。我理解您可以在不作出最终认定的情况下准予财产扣押，但我们今天并未准备好提交关于揭开公司面纱的全部证据。\n\n法院：好的。我们是否有口译员预计到达时间的信息？\n\n法院：好的。我们是否有口译员预计到达时间的信息？\n\n书记员：没有。仅知道口译员在下午约1:00被订定，他们正从布朗克斯区赶来。我在12:51 p.m.收到订定他们的电子邮件。\n\n法院：好的。那么我们应该不必再等太久。\n\n法院：让我从实际角度问原告一个问题——如果签发财产扣押令，而该项措施完全属于酌情决定，你们会处于怎样更有利的境地？\n\nMoss先生（莫斯先生）：是，法官阁下。\n\n法院：——如果签发财产扣押令，而该项措施完全属于酌情决定，你们会处于怎样更有利的境地？\n\nMoss先生：比现有通知命令更有利吗？法官阁下，您问的是财产扣押与通知命令之间，哪一种更有利吗？\n\n法院：是。\n\nMoss先生：我认为，通知命令的主要问题，或者主要问题之一，是根据通知命令，Kwok先生（郭文贵）——我这里就有——必须在他已经就该住宅签订出售或转让合同后，立即向我们提供书面通知。因此，到那个时候，他已经同某人约定出售该住宅。即使Sherry-Netherland（谢里-尼德兰）不批准，对方仍可能对该公寓享有权利。第二，该命令不适用于Genever的转让；我知道法院——而且我从实际角度理解——Genever实体位于该公寓的所有权架构之上。有两个Genever实体。如果其中一个或两个被转让，该命令便不适用于该情形。Sherry-Netherland对此不会知情。事实上，在本案期间，Genever实体的资产，包括该公寓，已经被质押，而无人知晓。因此，若将该命令扩大至包括Genever实体的转让、质押、让与和出售，并要求在转让前完成通知，则可解决其中一个问题。另一个问题是Zhang Wei（张伟）的证词。该证词称，Kwok先生曾说他并不拥有该公寓，其他人拥有，即张伟；张伟是质押该公寓的人，而且张伟显然可以随意处置该公寓。因此，所担心的是——\n\n法院：不，不，不。该公寓的法定所有人是Genever LLC；据我理解，该公司是一家由Kwok先生拥有的单一成员有限责任公司，对吗？\n\nMoss先生：嗯，情况略有不同——\n\n法院：然后，该Genever实体又由另一家Genever LLC拥有。\n\nMoss先生：而Kwok先生拥有后一家公司。\n\n法院：Kwok先生是后一家公司的唯一成员。\n\nMoss先生：正确，法官阁下。\n\n法院：因此，唯一能够转让该公寓所有权的实体，是持有产权的Genever实体，对吗？\n\nMoss先生：按理应当如此。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记员 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　案号：652077/2017　NYSCEF文件编号：331　NYSCEF收到日期：05/08/2019　案件22-50073　文件404-17　提交日期：05/20/22　录入日期：05/20/22 11:52:18　第107页，共126页\n\n法院：而拥有该公寓的Genever实体，只有在获得Sherry-Netherland董事会批准后才能转让该公寓的产权，对吗？\n\nMoss先生：嗯，拥有该公寓的纽约Genever实体受英属维尔京群岛实体控制。\n\n法院：我明白这一切。但该公寓的产权登记在Genever实体名下。\n\nMoss先生：是。\n\n法院：该实体位于纽约，并在Sherry-Netherland的记录中列为该公寓的所有人。\n\nMoss先生：正确，法官阁下。\n\n法院：该实体未经通知不能出售该公寓，对吗？\n\nMoss先生：嗯，现行命令规定——该命令作出时，我们尚未修正，因此被告是Kwok先生——必须提供——\n\n法院：好的。因此，至少我必须修正先前命令，禁止Kwok先生、Genever New York及Genever B.V.I.在未向你们发出通知的情况下转让、让与或质押该公寓；法院将作出该项命令，并将准备相应命令。现在，假定该命令在今天日落前录入，为什么你们仍需要财产扣押？以下各项均为假定：Kwok先生否认存在其对原告所负债务——而且这是在不对其中任何事项作出裁决的前提下——\n\nMoss先生：当然，法官阁下。\n\n法院：假定Kwok先生以虚假借口购入该住宅；假定某名神秘的中国政治犯Zhang Wei，W-E-I，控制Genever；假定但不作裁决，Kwok先生在本诉讼提起后，就可能将该住宅质押给另一实体一事说谎；假定但不作裁决，Kwok先生在其证言录取中就其从未试图将该住宅让与其儿子一事说谎；并假定但不作裁决，Kwok先生受到律师不当指示，未回答有关其出售该住宅意图的问题。你们如何受到不利影响？\n\nMoss先生：除此之外——我认为我们没有受到不利影响，法官阁下。显然，我们更希望获得财产扣押。这是一项财产权利。我们认为我们已经满足并且能够满足举证责任，但如果法官阁下希望如此处理，您知道，我没有——\n\n法院：我尚未认定事实，但我将作出我刚才所说明的命令；该命令是否使我们无须继续审理那些问题？\n\nSarnoff先生（萨诺夫先生）：我可以提一个相关问题吗？那么，我们是否也可以假定该动议暂时中止，并且我们可以在任何这些情况发生时再行提出？\n\n法院：嗯，这并不妨碍你们在何时获得我刚才指出的三名个人或实体中任何一方意图出售、质押、让与或以其他方式转让该住宅的通知时，申请财产扣押。\n\nSarnoff先生：在这些条件下，法官阁下，我们愿意接受该项命令，并愿意在此时中止或撤回我们的财产扣押动议。\n\n法院：好的。现在，被告对其中任何事项有异议吗？\n\n哈蒙先生：如果我认为那样能够解决问题，我早在很久以前就会提出，因此答案是否定的，我对此没有异议。不过，我确实希望明确，允许重新申请财产扣押而不损害权利，并非指他们想什么时候申请、或认为自己有更多证据时就什么时候申请，而是指在他们收到可能发生转让的通知时提出，这样我们就不会——\n\n法院：我不知道基于修正后的起诉状，本案的证据开示将揭示什么——\n\n哈蒙先生：但是，法官阁下——\n\n法院：——而且我不相信原告财力雄厚到会跑回来申请财产扣押，除非他们有比目前更充分的依据。\n\n哈蒙先生：我认为您会感到意外；我在上次口头辩论中也说过，我不知道他们为什么提出第二次申请，鉴于法官阁下在第一次申请中为他们设计的救济，那还是他们甚至未曾请求的救济。因此，我不理解第二次申请的必要性；如果有人对我们说，好吧，把这些实体也包括进去，我们会说可以。这是一项禁令。我们会遵守该禁令。这就是为什么我说，我只是希望明确，我们将从这里转入实体问题的证据开示，以便着手处理案件的核心争议，而不是仅仅处理他们是否能够在他们日后取得判决书时，针对Sherry公寓执行的问题。\n\n法院：但他们没有判决书。\n\n哈蒙先生：正是如此。\n\n法院：好的。为简化程序并避免提出任何财产扣押申请，我将录入的命令还将要求被告在Genever New York或Genever B.V.I.希望出售或转让其任何资产时发出通知。因此，B.V.I.不能出售——抱歉，Genever B.V.I.不能在未发出通知的情况下，将Genever New York出售给另一家有限责任公司。\n\n哈蒙先生：可以。\n\nSarnoff先生：也不能质押。\n\n法院：也不能质押。是的。对吗？那么我们办完了吗？\n\nMoss先生：我认为办完了。\n\nSarnoff先生：是，法官阁下。谢谢。\n\nMoss先生：谢谢。\n\n法院：好的。祝各位下午愉快，周末愉快。\n\nMoss先生：您也是。谢谢。\n\n* * * * * * *\n\n兹证明上述案件事项真实且准确。\n\n高级法庭记录员 Lisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉\nKwok HoWan（郭文贵）\n\nNYSCEF文件编号：331　NYSCEF收到日期：05/08/2019\n\n第126页，共126页　April 26, 2019\n\n地址（10）　58:18；67:14　18,22；39:2,11,14,19；April（2）\n§　17:4,6；20:3,6,7,8；同意（3）　40:18；41:21；43:5,7；49:7；51:\n\n12;56: 10;70: 10;98: I　12: 14;21 :6; I04: 15　44:4,6,7;46:3;55:4,　建筑师\n(I)\n地址\n(I)　协议\n(12)　18;56: 12;57: 17;　I 84:6\n\\$3.3 (2)　16:8　7:11;11:11;45:16;　58: 12;59:7;61\n:7,10;　辩称\n(I)\n61:21;63:24　充分\n(3)\n\\$60 (3)　61 :23;67: 17,25;68:2,　64:6,11,15;65:15;　71-13 I\n-\nI\n21 :2;22:4,23　62: 18,20; 102:9　7,18;70: 19;86: 19;　66: 1;67:3, 15;68:8,14,　进行辩论\n(2)\n延期\n(I)　93:20　21,21 ;69:2;70:6,12,　I\n16:21;45:12\nA　99:23　协议\n(I)　13,17,18;74:\n15,19;　辩论\n(6)\n行政\n(I)　67:16　75:25;76:\n13;79:21;　I 24:21;44:2,16;\n放弃\n(2)　67:4\n-　提前\n(7)　81:7,7,13,14,17,17,　:\n45:21;102:6;109:12\n49:21;51:3　管理人\n(5)　29: 15;34:7;62:\n12;　20,23;82:4;83:2;　论点\n(2)\n遵守 (I)　27:3,4;39:7;42:6;　63: 14;66: 17;87:21;　85:5,12,23;86:2,3,13,　I 32:14,16\n109:19　47:1　94:6　14,23;87:6,7,12,25;　周围\n(4)\n可采纳\n(I)　类似 (I)　90: 11 ;95:7,13;98:\n14;　20:23;48:25;55:\n19;\n能力\n(I)　26:20　56:25　104: 16,21,24;\n105: I,\n96:10　承认\n(3)　70:25\nI\n能够 (5)　Alliance（联盟）\n(I)　8,10,13,23;\n106:3,7,　安排\n(I)\n31: 19;49:8;72:23;　12:22;24:\n10;41: 17　2:2　10,14,17,24;\n109:24　I 101:21\n93:19;109:24　告诫\n(I)　允许 (3)　公寓的\n(2)　被逮捕\n(I)\n缺席\n(I)　13:19　8:20;66: 17;75: 13　30: 14;98:25　I 48:17\n87:14　成年人\n(I)　几乎\n(3)　道歉\n(3)　到达\n(I)\n绝对地\n(4)　50:24　20:11;47:3;52:23　41:9;96:13,17　I\n103: 18\n5:20;73:7,11;76:10　推进\n(3)　沿着 (3)　显然\n(I)　Asia（亚洲） (I)\n滥用\n(2)　73:20;96:\n16;98: 18　34:6;56:\n17; 108:2　105:9　I 2:2\n不利\n(I)　积累\n(I)　出庭\n(2)　搁置 (I)\n4:16;14:21　54:6\n同意 (I)　79:10　14:8;50: 13　I 102:7\n64:2　不利地\n(I)　惊人\n(I)　出庭\n(I)　主张\n(2)\n接受 (2)　9:8　58:15　97:13　I 92:9;94:\nII\n14:6;79:21　建议\n(I)　愿意接受\n(I)　出庭人员\n(2)　资产 (2)\n可接受\n(3)　76:7　108:15　2:4,11　I 7:2;24: 17\n99: 16,18,20　告知\n(I)　修订\n(I)　申请\n(13)　资产 (16)\n访问 (I)　72:4　106:22　7:22;57:\n12;59: 13;　I 6:8,9,20;\nII :25;\n宣誓书\n(41)　经修订\n(8)　60:2,24;62:22;65:\n13,　, 37:3;60:10,14,17,18;\n20:9　5: 17;23:2,12,18;　100: 10,13,15,20;\n容纳\n(I)　23;83:23;84:4;　61:13;62:19;74:3,3;\n96:22　25:8,9,12,14;26:20,　102: 1,2; 106:20;　109:13,15,17　80: 17,19; 104:25\nI\n完成\n(2)　23,25;27:\n1,17;28:24;　109:4　申请\n(2)　指派 (3)\n67:11;74:19　31: 10;35:7,23,25;　America（美国）\n(2)　58:12;63:10　I 6:25;107:15;\n已完成\n(2)　36:2,3,6,8;40:11,16;　49:4;51:\n14　适用\n(2)　108: 13\nI\n32: 19;86:4　41: 15, 15,23;42: 1,2;　American（美国人）\n(2)　59:6;90:10　被指派\n(I)\n准确\n(3)　44: 12, 16;46: 10, 12,　14: 15;47:5　适用\n(2)　I 98:11\n101:3,9,13　21 ;53:7,9,15,25;　Americans（美国人）\n(I)　104: 18,23　进行指派\n(I)\n横跨 (I)　宣誓书\n(I)　其中\n(2)　方法\n(I)\n6:19　42:4　17: 12　指派\n(I)\n代理 (2)　52:4;84: 12　接近\n(I)　I 104: 13\n3:25;64: 10　确认\n(I)　金额\n(4)　64:15　指派事项\n(I)\n诉讼行动 (4)　97:22　3:20;61: 19;62: 17;　适当\n(2)　I 105:4\n3:19;68:11;100:2,4　下午\n(3)　79:9　45:12;103:1　协助\n(I)\n行动\n(I)　75:3,4;103:20　和/或 (I)　批准\n(II)　I 97:20\n68:10　之后\n(2)　46:1　6:7;7:23;58:14;　助理\n(2)\n行为 (I)　27:23;59:20　答复\n(3)　65: 17;84: 13;85:24;　I 5: 14;77:25\n再次 (IS)　10:8;66:6,10　86:4;87:\n15;95:9;　同事\n(I)\n98:14　4:21 ;26:8;37:6;　不再\n(I)　98: 19; I06:4\n实际\n(2)　41 :9,25;43:4;45:20;　I 11:24\n44:9;97:\n1　43:8　批准\n(6)　假定\n(I)\n实际上\n(9)　47: I ;51: 1,1, I ;67: 13;　公寓\n(129)　7:21;80:13,15;　I 108:6\n3:8;8: 12;23:25;　87:2;94:2,8　4:2;5:23;6:2,12,25;　88:9;90:\n13; 104: 17　假定\n(9)\n41: I0,23;43:8;54:17;　针对\n(2)　7:9,13;8:21;\n10:20;　经批准\n(5)　102:6;\nI07:2,4,6,8,\n62:5,14　104:16;109:24　14:2,3,11,12;15:3;　61:3;80:10,22;　9,11,14,16\n添加 (2)　以前 (7)　18:25;19:4,17;20:20,　81 :25;83:24　1\n庇护\n(I)\n7: 19;42:3;55:20;　24;23:8;27:11,18,22;　批准\n(I)\n100:10,14　61: 12;70: 16;75: 10;　28:7,15,17,18,19,23;　114:17\n附加\n(I)　108:22　58:12　附上\n(2)\n29:4,6,9,17;30:7,17;　大约\n(4)　I 23:8;24:21\n4:12\n额外\n(2)\n80:2,4　同意 (5)\n9:21; 14:5;49:21;　32:21 ;33:2,9,10,\n12,\n13,21 ;34: 19;37: 16,　61 :21 ;63:21 ;64: 1;\n78:23　附具\n(3)\nI 6:23;40:\n15;41: 15\n\nMin-U-Script®（I）\\$3.3－附具\n\n已提交：纽约县书记员 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号：652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331　Pacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）v.　案卷 22-50073\n文件 404-17\n提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 113 页\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　共 126 页之　2019 年 4 月 26 日\n\n附件\n(34)　54:11,18,22;90:14;　董事会的\n(I)　购买 (I)　I 8:24;75: II\n2:25;3: 17,22,23;　109:4　65:19　87:25　证书\n(4)\n4:24;5: 15,18;8: 18;　基本\n(I)　账簿 (6)　BVI（英属维尔京群岛） (8)　I 88:1,5,7,12\n9:2;10:14;11:21;　10:II　12:19;41:13,14;　34: 16, 17,23;45:9,　主席\n(2)\n13:21;24:6;25: 15;　基本上\n(2)　69: 12;77:3,5　12;86: 13, 17;106:23　I 58:10;90:8\n44: 18;46: 15;78:3,5;　31:18;59: 17　双方 (6)　主席\n(I)\n98:8; 102:5,8, 11,14,　依据 (2)　10:22;22: 13;60: 17;　C　I 57:24\n17;I03: 1,13;104:4,7;\n107:3,22; 108: 10,17,　101:2;109:10\n开始\n(I)　92: 13;100:20; I04:22\n底部\n(I)\n,　质疑\n(2)\n24;109:9　63:3　20:17　致电 (4)\n16:22;66: 19;84: I;　I 13:13;14:21\n变更\n(3)\n尝试\n(I)　开始\n(I)　购买\n(I)　97:9　I 51: 10;66:20;67:7\n98:18　51:22　14:II　到来 (11)　变更\n(I)\n试图\n(I)　已开始 (I)　男朋友\n(2)　33:2;48:7,8;49:8,　I 62:21\n107:15　102:3　50:1,4　25;51: 14,21 ;52:22;　指控\n(2)\n尝试\n(I)　代表\n(7)　违反\n(I)　82:2,15;88:11　I 40:22,25\n4:2　19:3,16;23:4,5;　7:10　摄像机\n(I)　指控\n(2)\n出席\n(I)　64: 10;79: 12;82:3　中断\n(2)　50:22　I 61:18;81:4\n27:25　行为\n(2)　99:1,8　能够 (57)　追赶 (I)\n注意\n(8)　9:12;74:13　Brenda（布伦达）\n(4)　9:16,20;12:25;　I 6:19\n20: 16;26:6;28:24;　后面\n(I)　82:21,22,25;83:\nI　14:10;15:11,13,13;　首席\n(3)\n40: 14,21;69:8, 17;　56:17　简要陈述 (5)　24: 13, 15;25:4,7, I0;　I 56:23;76:5;78:9\n87:9　Beijing（北京）\n(4)　5:8;69: 14,18;70:5;　26:6,9,16,18;27:2,15,　China（中国）\n(11)\n律师\n(7)　33: 10,12;48:7,8　72:25　16;28: 17,20;31 :5;　14:17, 19,24; 15:9;\n27: I;28:9;33: 19;　受益\n(I)　已提交简要陈述\n(I)　34:4,5;40: 10;42:23;　48:25;49:2,2,9,10;\n42:9;46: I;58:8;64:25\n音频 (3)　86:15　3: I　43: 17;46:7, 18;47:25;　50:13,15\n11:22,22; 12:5　最佳\n(I)\n9:12　简要陈述\n(I)\n4:10　52:23;59:3;61 :2;\n64: 15;66: 12;69:8;　Chinese（中国人）\n(17)\n真实\n(2)　背叛\n(2)　简要地\n(5)　72: 17,19;73:25;74:2;　14:18,20;20:9;\n30:25;35: I0;42: 15;\n12:4,21　49:20,20　5:11;7:17;11:4;　77:23;83: 17;87: 12,　47:2;48: 18;49: 16;\n认证\n(I)　较好\n(7)　16:15;74:1　简要陈述 (2)　92: 10;98: 15;99:5;　50:6,14,20,25;59:23;\n69:20　48:2;75: 11,12,16;　II :5,6　101:22; 105:9,22;　选择\n(I)\n真实性\n(3)　104:3,5,6　提出 (3)　106:3; 107:24; 108:7;　I 47:2\n12:6; 13:13;43:20　大\n(I)　15:21;58:17,18　109:21　公民\n(I)\n可获得\n(I)　7:10　更大\n(I)　British（英国）\n(I)　取消\n(I)　I 14:15\n8:3　Avenue（大道） (I)　50:24　106:8　63:5　City（市）\n(2)\n98:3　最大\n(I)　扩大\n(I)　能力\n(2)　I 51:12;59:1\n避免 (4)　6:16　105:2　78:8;81:16　主张\n(4)\n5:15;11:15;44:13;　账单 (2)　经纪人\n(3)　标题\n(I)　1100:16;101:12;\n46:15　52:17,21　19:1;58: 16;64: 14　11:23　102:4;104:15\n知悉\n(I)　装订册\n(I)　Bronx（布朗克斯） (I)　注意\n(2)　澄清\n(3)\n75:22　43:21　103:21　13:18;105:5　I 19:13;32: 10;89: 17\n离开 (2)\n42:24;86:20　有约束力\n(I)\n87:11　兄弟\n(5)\n48~14,17;50: 10, 12,　案件\n(22)　明确\n(18)\n斧头 (I)　一点 (6)　19　4:1;9:2;10:8;\n12:II; 16:II ;23:2,20;　5:4;9:18;12:15;\n17:3;22:3;24:4;\n73:5　47:7;51: 10;52:25;　兄弟\n(2)　28:9;31: 19;33: 15,17;　33:22;41 :25;45:5,17;\n56: 16;91: 15;92:3　18:7;48:20　47: 18;70:4;79:7;　55':3;56: 10;85:6;\n8　咬\n(I)　建造\n(I)　89:11;98:14;102:16;　94:8; 101:25; I03:9;\n15:15　52:12　103:6;105:1,25;　108:23;109:20\n返回 (15)　Blair（布莱尔）\n(I)　建筑物\n(4)　109:4,23　清楚地\n(2)\n15:14;19:11;48:2,　84:17　6: 12;58:20;67: 16;　判例法\n(I)　I 38:7;91:18\n7,8;49:9;50: 15,16;　空白\n(2)　85:21　9:18　书记员\n(IS)\n51:21;52:23;63:4;　30:23,23　负担\n(2)　案件 (4)　2:1,11;17:2,3,7;\n87:2;89: 13;99: 15;　董事会\n(36)　98:7;107:24　4:4,20;5:2;24:\n18　56:8,9,13;97: 12, 18,\n109:8　7: 18,23;57: 16,21;　业务\n(3)　偶然\n(I)　19,22,25;99: 19;\n背景\n(4)　58:11,19,22;59:15,　15:9;18:11;57:9　25:25　103:19\n39:9;47:4,16;58:6　22,24;62:4,8,13,17;　企业\n(I)　事由\n(I)　Cleveland（克利夫兰）\n(5)\n坏\n(I)　79: 13,16, 18,20,24;　18:4　3:19　17:18;58:9;93:7,9,\n53: 19　80:6,8, I0, 12;83 :22,　购买 (5)　CEO（首席执行官） (I)　11\n障碍\n(2)\n14:25;31:2　23,25;84:2;85:25;\n86: 18,22;87: 15;　6:11;10:20;61:7,\n10;85:5　7:17　客户\n(4)\n依据 (8)　90: 10, 13;93: 10;　购买\n(I)　某些\n(2)\nII :25;89: 19　I 5:3;8:23;58: 17, 18\n6: 17;15:8; 16:4;　95:10;106:4　81:22　当然\n(2)　客户的\n(I)\nI 99:12\n\nMin-U-Script® I\n\n(2) 附件－客户的\n\n已提交：纽约县书记员 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号：652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331　案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉　文件 404-17\n提交于 05/20/22　录入于 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 114 页\nNYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\nKwok HoWan（郭文贵）　第 126 页　April 26, 2019\n诊所（1）　关于\n（1）\n58:9　32:21　4:16;50:6;60:3\n受控制的\n（1）　14,15;28:12,13;29:2,\n6,11,13,15,20;30:21;98:25;102:9;\n106:18\n片段（5）　让步\n（1）　106:7　32:11,14;34:7;35:7,　目前\n（1）\n10:5;11:22;13:10;21:6　控制\n（4）　16;37:8;38:19,25;I 51:16\n91:11;92:15　结论\n（1）　8:15;10:21;87:5;40:13;41:12,19,21;　支撑\n（1）\n片段（3）　102:16　107:11　43:11,23;44:20,25;　20:11\n9:3;10:4;13:5　压缩\n（1）　便利\n（3）　45:24;46:9,11,13,17;\n接近（5）　99:5　21:16,19,22　50:13;51:4,6;53:4,　D\nI\n45:10;63:3,5,8,15　条件\n（1）　谈话\n（3）　10;54:6,24;55:15,22,\n关闭（1）　58:19　26:1;38:24;39:I　25;56:3;58:\n15,25;　每日（2）\n63:18　条件\n（2）　谈话\n（1）　59:3;60:8,22;61\n:2;　I 52:15,16\n结束语（2）　61:14;108:14　38:23　62:9;63:13;66:8,17;　日期（2）\n62:22;63:22　行为\n（1）　首席运营官（2）　67:1,9,14;68:13,16,　I 41:4;49:7\n同事\n（4）　102:3　6:6;57:11　18,24;69:10,21,25;　注明日期\n（1）\n42:15;47:3,8;52:20　进行\n（2）　合作社（1）　70:1,5,9,11,21,24;　I 45:10\n收集（13）　102:12;103:10　59:1　71:1,3,5,14;72:8,10,　女儿\n（1）\n27:5;28:3;31:13;　商议（1）　合作\n（1）　12,17,19,21;73:2;　I 48:19\n39:8;42:7,13,18;52:2,\n4,13,14;54:I;109:24　16:1\n保密的\n（1）　10:1\n合作的\n（2）　74:8,11,17,21;75:13,　日（7）\n已收集\n（2）　59:21　15:7;80:22　23;76:7,23;77:3,7,9,\n12,12,15,18;78:\n14;　42:8;50:23;51:\nI;\n52:15;58:7;81:3;\n42:5;54:9　确认\n（1）　副本（1）　85:2,23;86:2,7,24;　91:19\n收集\n（2）　5:21　78:24　87:11,14,20;88:24;　哥伦比亚特区（1）\n42:9,14　困惑的（2）　副本（8）　89:10,13;90:18,22;　I 45:8\n学院（1）　38:3;45:20　17:II;69:22;72:2;　92:2,8;93:2,5,8,12,　交易（1）\n50:2　联系\n（1）　76:2;77:9,16;78:5,21　14,16,19;94:3,4,6,II,　I 109:22\n问答（1）　84:13　复制（1）　15,18,21,25;95:6,16,　交易\n（3）\n46:1　同意\n（2）　78:1　22;96:10,15,19;97:4,　I 9:16;62:15;102:17\n到来（4）　15:2;98:16　公司\n（3）　8,10,12,17,21,23;　敬启者（3）\n15:6;73:12;94:10;　保守的\n（6）　4:16;10:22;100:7　98:4,5,19,23;99:7,\nII,　I 20:16;21:15,18\n103:20　31:18;35:4,10,14,　公司\n（2）　15,18,20,21,22,23;　债务（2）\n沟通\n（3）　15,17　37:4;78:20　100:2,6,12,17,25;　I 8:22;107:5\n10:6;27:25;73:20　考虑\n（3）　正确地\n（1）　101:6,10,12,15,17;　决定（1）\n共产党\n（11）　9:20;94:3;102:21　21:7　102:9,19,21,23;　I 103:1\n14:20,22;20:9;　考虑到\n（1）　腐败\n（1）　103:17,23;104:3,8,　已决定\n（1）\n42:15;47:3;48:18;　92:2　14:23　19;105:12,16,19,22;　I 108:1\n49:16;50:6,14,20,25　一致的\n（2）　律师\n（7）　106:2,9,12,16,21,25;　作出决定\n（4）\n公司\n（3）　38:20;65:19　2:4,12;32:6;71:7;　107:8;I08:1,9,18;　I 107:6,11,14,16\n7:24;18:15,19\n公司\n（4）　构成\n（1）　72:16,24;107:17　109:3,7　决定\n（1）\n8:22;34:18,18;47:4　29:25\n限制（1）　律师的\n（1）　法庭\n（1）　I 96:8\n申诉\n（7）　62:24　11:6\n柜台\n（3）　9:12　深的（1）\n100:10,13,15,20;　联系\n（9）　6:4;21:7;91:12　法院\n（1）\n46:14　I 109:8\n违约（1）\n102:2,3;109:5　19:5;66:4,20,21;　反诉\n（1）　覆盖（1）\n完整\n（1）　67:1,4;82:18,20,21　3:21　62:18　I 6:18\n击败（1）\n4:15　已联系\n（1）　反驳\n（3）　覆盖范围\n（1）　I 8:17\n完成（2）　50:10　21:10,12;91:6　62:20　被告\n（6）\n44:15;75:14　主张\n（1）　计数器\n（1）　涵盖\n（1）　I 2:20;3:20;10:3;\n完全地（2）　101:17　91:13　61:17　98:9;100:25;I06:19\n11:12;38:20　背景\n（3）　国家\n（3）　CPLR\n（4）　被告\n（2）\n完整性\n（2）　13:9;15:19;95:11　9:25;15:6;49:20　5:24;9:6;24:24;　I 12:16;108:18\n13:7;96:9　继续\n（2）　夫妇（3）　45:22　被告的\n（7）\n完成\n（1）　50:6;51:14　16:15;67:6;95:21　可信度\n（2）　I 76:20,21,24;77:\n13,\n103:7　持续\n（3）　过程\n（9）　26:20;46:15　23;78:13;101:1\n复杂的\n（2）　44:8,24;45:20　10:24;12:24;26:2,　债权人\n（2）　定义（2）\n26:15;87:21　合同\n（7）　2;95:4;99:14;102:22;　3:25;98:9　I 52:1,1\n遵守（1）　15:2;63:6;75:24;　107:7;108:9　交叉询问（18）　欺诈（2）\n76:9　76:7;85:11;86:22;　法院\n（211）　13:6;16:12;47:22;　I 3:25;98:9\n概念\n（2）　104:13　2:6,23;3:4,10,13;　75:I;77:5;89:18,20,　已欺诈\n（2）\n15:6,10\n关切\n（1）　矛盾的\n（1）　8:17;9:16,19,20,21;　20,23;90:4;91:4;　I 8:10,13\n105:10　8:6\n相反\n（1）　11:10;16:1,17,21;　95:16;96:2,3,5,6,8,15　已送达\n（1）\n关切的\n（2）　26:13　17:9;19:23;22:4;\n23:16;24:8,15;25:3,　文化的\n（1）\n15:18　I 76:16\n6:17;88:20　控制\n（3）　23;26:10,15;27:10,　当前\n（3）　要求\n（1）\nI 3:20\n\n——\n\nMin-U-Script®（3）诊所－要求\n\n纽约县书记官备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号 652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉　文件 404-17\n提交于 05/20/22　录入于 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 115 页\nNYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　第 126 页　April 26, 2019\nI\n证明\n（2）　15:9　50:8,13,18,22　59:10　负担\n（5）\n5:15;9:1　死亡（1）　文件\n（37）　耳朵（1）　I 5:24;24:19;44:9;\n示证物\n（1）　13:3　17:15;19:20;23:13;　13:11　45:22,23\n90:19　词典\n（1）　25:17;26:I,4,7,13,21;　东部（1）　终止（2）\n被拒绝（3）　53:22　29:10;40:15;41:10,　17:6　I 49:22;65:22\n8:3;24:21;38:22　差异\n（6）　16,20;43:4,14,21;　编辑（1）　执行\n（1）\n否认\n（3）　35:8;36:9,11,14;　44:20;45:3,10;46:4,　99:2\nI 98:10\n7:1,3;107:4　53:2,4　20,21,23;54:23;　教育\n（1）　英格兰\n（1）\n否认\n（1）　不同的\n（10）　59:24;68:3;69:15,19,　10:25　I 65:1\n6:3　18:8,10,11;27:9;　20,24;71:12,16,17,　Edward（爱德华）\n（1）　英语（20）\n作证（3）　29:8,8,9;66:11;67:6;　23;77:14,20　2:14　15:1,4,5,14;19:7,\n41:25;42:3,10　96:6　书面证据\n（1）　效力（1）　10,11;30:24;31:1;\n已作证\n（8）　困难的\n（1）　7:5　107:1　47:7;53:18,19;68:3;\n7:18;29:23;30:3,　75:18　文件资料\n（3）　有效地\n（1）　75:7;82:25;83:I,9,11,\n19,22;31:3,10,24　困难\n（2）　57:14;59:22;65:14　56:25　14,15\n询问证人\n（2）　31:6;42:22　文件\n（42）　高效的\n（1）　足够\n（6）\n36:12,12　摘要（1）　15:25;27:4,5,9;　90:16\n存款\n（11）　I 5:3;16:22;51:4;\n47:11　直接（11）　21;39:8;42:7,8,12,14,　努力\n（2）　72:20;90:21;109:8\n6:16;61:17,20;　9:22;17:17;20:16;　19,20,22,24;45:7,8,　录入\n（2）\n62:3;63:19,24;64:7;　67:18;80:24;81:1,3　26:6;28:23;40:14,21;　18;47:13,15;49:17;　5:15;8:17　I\n85:11;86:22\n证言\n（42）　54:15;56:14;69:8,17　52:5,14;53:10,13,14,　努力\n（5）　已录入\n（6）\n8:2,10;9:5,7,13;　已指示\n（2）　17,20,23,25;54:1,2;　18:24;19:17　I 75:23;76:6,16;\n11:7,16;12:4;17:12;　102:5;107:17　60:6;67:19;78:24;　任一（12）　79:4;106:19;I07:2\n28:4;29:19,22;31:25;　直接地\n（3）　79:10,11;84:12　6:14;8:10;22:10,　全部\n（2）\n32:7,8,22;33:16,18;　8:6;46:15,16　美元\n（1）　20;28:15;42:15,16,　I 92:17;94:I\n34:20;35:14;38:12,　董事\n（3）　60:1　17;47:9;51:23;84:7;　实体\n（16）\n23;39:25;42:23;43:2;　57:22;87:15;106:4　主导\n（1）　90:1　8:4,15;10:19,20,21,\n66:13,15;73:18;89:4;　分歧\n（2）　8:15　年长的\n（2）　23;36:21,25;37:2;\n92:4,9;93:17,21;　12:24;44:19　支配\n（1）　48:14;50:10　100:11,14;104:21,25;\n94:12,13;95:17,20;　消失\n（3）　4:16　要素\n（1）　105:3;108:12;109:18\n96:11,21,23;101:13;　47:9;51:24;52:20　完成（4）　98:8　有权获得\n（4）\n107:15　披露\n（1）　14:12;15:20;65:12;　要素\n（2）　19:6,15;96:21;\n证言\n（1）　75:23　105:4　3:18;4:15　101:20\n13:4　证据开示\n（9）　双重\n（2）　已引出\n（1）　权利\n（1）\n深度\n（1）　15:21,23;16:2;　61:6;85:6　32:18　I 102:14\n103:12\n44:18;102:3,12;　怀疑\n（1）　引出\n（1）　实体\n（18）\n派生\n（2）　103:8;109:3,21　22:7　28:21　27:12;29:8,8,9;\n62:3,4　差异\n（3）　向下（6）　其他（6）　52:5;81:20,23;\n描述\n（1）　45:7,9,17　38:8;39:6;55:22;　52:18;54:13;55:21;　101:18;105:16,22,24;\n58:14　酌情决定的\n（1）　63:19,25;107:3　84:21;88:13;105:8　106:2,6,7,8,10,16;\n指定\n（18）　104:4　起草\n（1）　他人的（1）　107:13\n13:6;89:18,18;　讨论\n（7）　27:1　电子邮件（15）　错误\n（1）\n90:5;91:7,13,15;92:5,　22:14;37:23;38:I,　绘制\n（2）　10:6;19:25;20:3,6,　I\n6,13,14,16,19,24;　2,4;44:8,24　63:19,25　7,8,12,17,25;21:\n1,8;　尤其\n（2）\n93:I,23;96:9;97:2　已讨论\n（1）　删除（1）　22:12;77:25;78:3;　I 27:23;75:10\n指定事项\n（14）\n62:17　47:10　103:21　建立\n（2）\n13:7;89:20,21,24;　讨论\n（4）　适当地（5）　已发送电子邮件\n（1）　I 3:24;100:18\n91:4,4,8;93:23;　24:3;33:5;38:　17:I;56:7;59:2;　22:11　已建立\n（4）\n95:16;96:2,2,3,5,6　39:5　97:18,19　电子邮件\n（2）　170:11,14;102:14,\n细节（2）　讨论\n（3）　在……期间\n（7）　19:15;20:14　25\n58:15;103:12　19:3;37:21,24　6:7;11:16;12:25;　强调\n（1）　确立\n（1）\n详细的\n（1）　展示\n（7）　61:5;95:4,20;I05:1　42:6　1102:19\n59:25　3:12;19:22;23:15;　义务（1）　受雇\n（1）　遗产\n（1）\n细节（2）　28:11;40:12;43:22;　10:25　147:6\n56:18　估计的\n（2）\n38:9;39:7　69:9　雇员\n（2）　I 61:18;103:18\n拘留\n（1）　被剥夺\n（1）　E　48:22;51:23　欧洲\n（2）\n49:19　98:12　雇主\n（1）　1 48:7;49:3\n决定\n（3）　争议\n（4）　较早的\n（2）　18:22　评估\n（1）\n102:24;103:4,14　4:17;18:3;44:4,21　79:2;99:2　已设定负担\n（1）　I 26:19\n确定\n（1）　有争议的\n（1）　最早\n（3）　98:12　闪烁其词（1）\n103:2　12:6　21:16,19,22　设定负担\n（1）\n开发者\n（1）　离婚\n（4）　早期的\n（1）　24:17　19:14\n回避性\n（2）\n\nMin-U-Script®（4）证明－回避性\n\n纽约县书记官备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文书编号 331　案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉　文书 404-17\n提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 116 页\nNYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　共 126 页　April 26, 2019\nI\n9:18,23　5,10,23;78: 13,18;　5: 16;87: 14;88: 19;　3: 17,18,21 ;4: 17;　自由\n(1)\n甚至 (16)　92:4,5;93:20;96:\n11　102: 13　5: 1,13;10:5; 12:13;　14:23\nI\n11:18;12:2;30:20,　出示\n(1)　方式\n(1)　16: 15,23;30:20,25;　法国的\n(1)\n24;32:7;35:6;36:\n16,　92:10　32:18　34:4;39:21 ;40: 14,22,　I 31: 1\n20;42:21 ;46:25;　证物\n(9)　塑造\n(1)　24;48:4;49:25;50:\n1;　Frick（弗里克）(1)\n47: 13;55:7;62: 10;　12:18,20,25; 15:I;　109:14'　53: 16;54: 15,20,21;　I 58:8\n86:21;104: 16;109: 15　24:2;42:4,5;53:\n11,12　偏袒 (1)　59: 19, 19,24;64: 14;　前方\n(13)\n事件 (1)　存在 (2)　98: II　69:2;78: 17;79:24;　24:8,14,20;25:2;\n75:24　44:9;54:23　FBAKOY\n(2)　90: 14;95: 19;97: 15;　30:9,21 ;31 :7;46:22;\n所有人\n(2)　存在\n(2)　40:22,25　98:22,25;109:14.　50:22;51 :2;53:6;\n52:17;99:10　46:13;107:5　特色\n(1)　五 (4)　54:12;97:3\n证据\n(36)　迅速的\n(I)　4:10　39:6;48: 16;49: 11;　挫败\n(5)\n4:5,8,8,9,21 ;5:7,8,　32:18　February（2月）\n(3)　62:18　I 4:1;5:1;11:9;\n9,18;7:5;9:22; 12:22;　昂贵的\n(1)　18:18;59: 10;63:3　五年\n(1)　24:18;98:10\n13:19,23; 16:8, 16;　6:2　感觉 (1)　61:18　完整的 (4)\n19:24;23:22;24: 10;　解释\n(4)　108:24　流利的\n(2)　I 13:9; 17:4;56:9;\n25:2,9;26:22;41:11;　6: 15; 18:5;30: 16;　英尺 (1)　83:15,16　93:10\n53:8;60:7;69: 19,20;　36: 11　90:19　聚焦 (1)　完全地 (1)\n72: 10,21;78: 13;　表述\n(1)　Feng（冯）(1)　4:19　I 3:1\n90:23;92:11;93:1,25;　13:19　63:7　文件夹\n(1)　进一步\n(1)\n103:15;108:25　现存的\n(2)　少数 (3)　59:21　I 47:20\n证据性的\n(2)　46:3,6　9:3;23:25;87: 18　遵循 (2)\n90:22; 103: 11　延长的\n(1)　Firth（弗思）(1)　34:5;84:24　G\n准确地 (3)　14:19　98:3　随后\n(1)　I\n6:12;9:25;14:11　广泛的\n(2)　斗争 (1)　66:1　I\nGaro（加罗）\n(1)\n询问\n(8)　14:20;32:15　11:15　下列\n(5)\n17:17;47:22;55: 16;　广泛地\n(1)　数字 (3)　4:4;29:23,24;　I 2:17\n收集\n(11)\n56: 14;75: 1;84:22;　11:5　47: 12;53:22;91: 16　103:7;107:4\n96: 15;98:20　程度\n(6)　我 (1)　27:5,8;28:3;33:6,\n审查\n(1)　25:5;90:5;91 :7,12;　如下 (3)　18;34: 17;35: 19;37: 1;\n16:12　42:20　17:2;56:8;97:20　41:6;53:10,16\n92:8;93:24　调解 (3)　强制 (1)　已收集\n(13)\n已审查\n(3)　F　9:24;44: 12;46:21　50:7　22:9,14,19;30:\n17;\n17:2;56:8;97:20　人次 (1)　外国的\n(6)　31:20,21 ;36:22;37:7,\n示例 (1)　43:1　6: II ;31: I;61: 10;　10,13 ;39:22;53 :2, 13\n13:9　事实 (4)　填写 (1)　85:7,15;87:8　给予 (5)\n超过 (1)　6:4;21 :5;102: 16;　76:21　伪造\n(1)　I 26: 19;43:25;51 :2;\n3:20　104:24　最终的 (3)　47:17　59:21;79:9\n摘录\n(I)　因素\n(1)　102:24; I03 :6, 14　伪造的\n(5)　齿轮 (1)\n8:3　9:20　最后\n(3)　49: 16, 17, 18;50:21,　I 62:21\n交换\n(1)　事实 (5)　7:6;8: 14;11:20　25　一般的\n(3)\n19:15　5: 19;36:6;37:9;　财务的\n(11)　忘记\n(1)　I 56:25;57: 11,11\n删节的 (1)　100:15;108:2　7: 19,22;31 :6;47:5;　49:7　通常地\n(3)\n95:20　公平的 (9)　59:15,17,25;79:11;　形式 (4)　58:6,14;82:21\nI\n排除\n(1)　12:7; 16:22;60:21;　90:11,12,14　4: 16;74: 18;81 :7;　Genever（热内维尔）\n(42)\n61:5　72:20;79:9,15;85:7,　财务资料\n(1)　95:4　8:15,24;10:19;\n借口 (4)　8;90:21　7:24　前任的\n(3)　33: 14,21,24;34: 13,\n11:5;19:16;20:11;　仙女 (1)　找到 (1)　58:7,9;84:17　15,15,22,23;36:21,\n95:2　95:10　68:22　提出\n(1)　25;37:4,4;39: 12, 15,\n获准免责 (2)　虚假的 (3)　认定\n(2)　20:23　19;40:2;67: 16;76:6;\n55:23;88:25　7: 15;46: 13;107:9　32:16;102:15　向前\n(2)　88:20,20;95:8,9;\n免责\n(1)　熟悉的\n(1)　罚金 (8)　12: 11;20:20　100: 10, 14;104: 19,20,\n61:9　3:2　83: 11,14;89:15;　争斗\n(1)　21,25; 105:3, 13,16,\n签署执行 (1)　家庭 (50)　95:24;97:6;99: 17,22;　11: 13　17,23; 106:2,6, 10,22,\n67:16　14:19,19;15:10;　109:18　发现 (2)　23;107:11\n行政人员\n(3)　17:20,21,22,25; 18:1,　手指\n(1)　60:25;70:22　Gilbert（吉尔伯特）\n(2)\n6:6;56:23;78:8　2,3,5,5,8,8, I0, 10, 10,　13:11　四 (3)\n证物\n(36)　11,12,13,14,15,18,22;　完成\n(1)　3: 16;5: 10;69: 17　I 77:25;81:11\n3: 12;19:22;23: 15;　23:6;47:8;48:5,6,9,　48:7　已给予 (13)\n24:1,2,9;28:11;40:10,　France（法国）\n(1)　9:9;25:6;26: 12, 13;\n10,11,12,14,19,24;　律所 (2)　50:2　31: 12;36: 10;76:2;\n12,24;41: 12,13,14;　49:6,9,13,20,21 ;50:7;　欺诈\n(3)　79: 16;98:21 ;99:4;\n43:21,22;53:7;69:9,　51: 12,13, 15,20;52:2,　律所 (2)　4:25;5:5;46:\n16　101:15;109:1,13\n21;71: 16,21,22;72: I;　2,8, I 1;53 :24　62:15;92:3　欺诈性的\n(1)　给予 (1)\n76:20,22,23,24 ;77:3,　远 (4)　第一 (37)　25:1　I 25:7\n\nMin-U-Script@（5）甚至－给予\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文书编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）　文书 404-17\n提交日期 05/20/22\n诉　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 117 页\nNYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　共 126 页　April 26, 2019\n\n给予 (13)　45:25　39:3;49: 14;74:8;　23;95:2,3;96:25;　I 24:8;25:8;29:22;\n20: 18;29:24;30: 11;　中途\n(I)　90:8;95:7;98:22,24　98:21 ;99: 17;100:5,9,　30:1\n32:3;34:2,11,25;　91:19　听证\n(13)　19,24; 10I: 14, 16;　重要的\n(3)\n38: 17;40:8;42: I;　手\n(2)　13:1,8,20; 15:22;　102: I; 103:9, 10;　I 9:9,10;30:24\n80: 13;106: 17,24　77:3,16　35: 19;45:24,25;55:5;　104:2,6; 105:21;　重要的是\n(I)\n地球\n(I)　递交\n(10)　63:7;90:22;98:7;　106: I, 15; 107:7,22,　I 8:25\n6:20　17: 15;19:20;23: 13;　100:18;103:11　24; 108: 15;109:6,14　施加\n(I)\nGMail（谷歌邮箱）\n(I)　43: 14;69: 15,24;　心\n(I)　Honor's（霍纳的）\n(I)　I 61: 13\n20:4\n去 (3)　71 :23;77: 14,20,22\n处理\n(3)　109:23　13: 18　不可能的\n(I)\n46: 15,16;107:3　27:24;35: II ;51 :25　脚跟 (1)\n66:23　希望 (3)\n13:21;16:6,7　I 91: 15\nGolden（戈尔登）\n(13)　处理过\n(3)　持有 (3)　无望的\n(I)　不恰当地\n(I)\n23:5;27:3;42:7;　15:24,24,25　57:2;81:7,14　42:18　I 107:17\n47:2;51: 16,19,21,23,　手\n(4)　帮助 (11)　Hoplamazian（霍普拉马齐安）\n(3)　不足的\n(I)\n25;52: 1,11,22;53:24　31:12,22;35:12;　27:8;28:9;42: 18;　2: 17,17;69:22　I 79:25\n无意中\n(I)\nGood（古德）(13)　47:16　45: 13;47:8, 18,18;　Horvitz（霍维茨）\n(18)　I 101: 18\n2:9,13,21,24;　方便的\n(I)　52: 13,13,14;73: 12　7: 16, 16,22;8:2,8,　不适当的\n(3)\n12:12;13:5;47: 12,24;　4:7　有帮助的\n(I)　12;58:2;81: 16;84:2,　I\n11:13,18;72:5\n56: 16;75:3,4,8, 10　发生\n(2)　4:11　8,24,25;85:3 ;89:4;　包括\n(4)\nGovernment（政府）\n(3)　31:2;50:19　帮助\n(I)　90:7,8,12;93 :2　I 96:4;104:25;105:3;\n14:18,21,22　发生了\n(9)　7:3　Horvitz's（霍维茨的）\n(2)　109: 18\ngraciously（亲切地）\n(I)　6:9,13;9:13;10:15;　Hey（嘿）(2)　58:6;90:24　酒店 (4)　已包括\n(2)\n96:22　II: 1;12:8;27:23;　7:12;12:5　6: 10,14;7:21 ;57:8　I 7:24;58:24\n授予 (1)　33:15,17　高度地 (2)　小时\n(4)　包括在内\n(9)\n103:13　正在发生\n(4)　84:11,12　18:6,7;33: 18;\ngrateful（感激的）\n(I)　14:3,4;38:9;42:24　本人 (5)　13;　48: 19,22,25;49: I;\n36:10　发生\n(I)　10:24,25;18:7;　94:2　52: 12,13\ngreat（极好的）(1)　85:20　51: 15;86:20　Huang（黄）\n(I)　不一致的\n(3)\n15:15　愉快地\n(I)　Ho（何）(4)　97:15　25:6;26: 17;38: 19\nt\n更大的\n(I)　2:7　2:2; 17:24;59:4;　H-U-A-N-G（黄）\n(I)　索引 (1)\n109:9　高兴的\n(5)　98:2　97:16　I 2:1\n成长\n(I)　44: 12;46: 19;91:20,　H-O（何）(I)　百\n(2)　表明\n(5)\n14:16　21;99:5　98:2　18:6,9　I 32:20;76: 12;96: I,\n研磨\n(I)　困难的\n(2)　Hodgson（霍奇森）\n(2)　丈夫\n(13)　18;108:3\n73:6　9:21;91:3　2:19,22　49: 13, 19, 19,19,20,　表明\n(I)\n理由\n(2)　HARMON（哈蒙）\n(69)　持有 (2)　22;50:1,4,8,10,11,19,　I 31:11\n3:23;70:8\n成长\n(I)　2:21,22;5:25;\n12: 12;34:3;43: 16;　60:10,14　个人\n(I)\n14:16　60:5,20;62:6;63:\nII;　Holdings（控股公司）\n(2)\n37:4,4　I　I 49:1\n保证\n(4)　66:6,9,15;67:12;68:9,　持有 (I)　引诱\n(2)\n61:25;67: 19;68: 19;　15,17;69: 12,18;70:7;　105:24　JD（法学博士）\n(2)　I 7:21;8:19\n不公平\n(I)\n100:3　71:11,15,25;72:9,18;　Hong（洪）(4)　40:22,25\n保证的\n(I)　73:4;74:5,14,16,20;　14:17;18:15;49:3;　想法 (3)　I 5:2\n信息\n(72)\n8:23　75:2,5;76: 19,24;77:4,　84:7　33:1;53:1;58:15　7:20,23,24;22:\n10,\n猜测 (5)　8,11,13,16,19;78:12;　Honor（法官阁下）\n(106)　身份识别\n(I)　10,15,15,16,19,20;\n30: 15;32:2;35: 13;　83: 17,21;84:21 ;85:4,　2:9,13,21,24;3:\n1,9,　77:23　27 :2,5,6,6, 9;28: 3,3;\n71: 1,1　9;87: 1,18,23;88:23;　14;4:22;5:4;8: 1,12,　已识别\n(I)　30: 16, 17, 18;31 :21;\n猜测\n(I)　89:2,12,15;92:21\n;　25;9:10,13;11:4,20;　108:12　33:6,7,19;34: 17;35:3,\n70:25　94: 17, 19,23;95:2;　12:10, 12;13:2,5,8,21;　识别\n(I)　9,11,19,19,24;36:1,\nGuo（郭）(23)　100:24;101:4,7,11,　14:12;15:16;16:9, 10,　3:6　14,23;37: I,7, 10, 12,\n17:22,25,25; 18:2,5,　14,16,22; 102:22;　14,20,22;17:10,11;　忽略\n(I)　13,14,20;39:8,22;\n5,22;23 :6;48:4,6,9,　108:20; 109:6,11　19:19;23:22;24:4, 12,　30:2　41 :7;42:7,8;43:9;\n10,12,24;49:6;51: 12,　Haroche（阿罗什）\n(I)　13;29: 14;30:21 ;34:3;　想象\n(I)　49: 18;52: 14;54:9;\n13,15,19;52:2,8,11;　81:11　38:22;41 :8;43: 13,16,　9:21　58:24;59: 15,18,20;\n53:24　听到 (14)　21;44:1,10;46:7,8,18;　IMG（图像）\n(1)　60: I,2,4, 10;79:3, II,\nG-U-O（郭）(2)　3:16;13:20,25;　47:21 ;48:3;51 :9;　58:10　即时的\n(2)　15,18,25;80:2,4;\n17:22;18:2　14:10;16:3;32: 16,17;　55:3,13,14;60:5,20;　48:11;104:12　90:11,12,14;98:22,\nH　33:6;43: 10;44:3;　62:6;63: 11;67: 12;　影响\n(2)　24;101:3,8\nI\n47:25;89: II ;90: 18;　68:9;69: 18,22;70:7;　73:10;102:20　启动\n(2)\n95:5　71:11,25;74:5;76:19;　弹劾\n(2)　I 101:19;107:13\n被黑客入侵的\n(1)　听说\n(15)　77: 1,4,8,16;78: 12;　禁令\n(2)\n20:8\n一半 (1)　29:7,7;30: 10;33:5;\n35:20;37:7, I0;38:25;　83: 17;89:2,7;90:7;　28: 17,20　I\n109:19,19\n92: 12;93:23;94: 17,　弹劾\n(4)　询问 (3)\n\nMin-U-Script@（6）给予－询问\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文书编号 331　案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）\n诉　文书 404-17\n提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 118 页\nNYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　共 126 页　April 26, 2019\n英语\n\n64: 10;66:3;82:3　106:8　知悉（13）　68: 10;71 :6;72: 16,24,　83:10\nI\n询问\n(I)　争议点（25）　21: 1;22:4,8,25;　25;74: 13;75:7;82: 18;　冗长的\n(I)\n82:6　3: 17,21,22;4: 12,12,　25:22;27:4;69:2;　83:5,23;84:4;\n101: 13　I 98:20\n被指示\n(2)　14;15:17, 18;24:4, 10,　76:5;80: 12,17, 19;　较少（2）\n11:10;83:2　15,19;26: 14;41: 18;　81:22;105:2　L　:\n99:3,9\n指示\n(I)　51 :25;54: 16;55:4;　知情\n(39)　信件\n(8)\n11:24　88:16;91:14,24;　5:20,20;26:24;　作出（2）　I 64:25;71:9;72:4,7,\n指示\n(I)　102:2,7,17; 103: 12;　27:7,21;28:1;29:11;　44:2; 100:21　8,19;78:5,17\nII: 18　108:2　31:20,21 ;32:21 ;33:3,　语言\n(10)　信件\n(2)\n指示\n(I)\n11:6　已签发（2）　8,11;34:14;35:18,22;　14:25; 15: 17;30:24,　I 84:14,16\n打算\n(I)　88:1 ;104:4\n争议点（12）　36:6,7,22;37:3,6,9,\n13,14,15;43:9;47:5,6;　25,25;31: 1,2;36: 15;　说谎者（I）\n47:17\n100:22　2:25;3:6;5:22;　53: 1,2;54:8, 16,18,22;　53: 17;54: 12\n最后（13）　!\n自由\n(I)\n意图中的\n(I)　10: 15;15:21,23;16:2;　55:7,9,10;62:7;64:3　11:20;13:10;18:21;　I\n92:23　24: I;52:21 ;54: 12;　已知（2）　26:6;32: 19;44:2;　95: 11\n撒谎（3）\n意图\n(I)　100:8;109:22　3:20;84:8　50:9;82:22;86:8;　I 8:10;107:12,14\n99:4　签发\n(I)　知道（3）　95:7;97: 15; 102:6;　生命（I）\n意图\n(I)　102:21　9:25;28: 14;52: 18　109: 12　I 51:21\n11:8　Kong（4）　后来\n(2)　举起（2）\n意图（10）　J　14:17;18:16;49:3;　9:11;68:23　i 44:18;45:19\n3:25;4:6,18;5: I;　84:7　法律（2）　轻微的（I）\n14:2;24: 18;25: I;　监狱（4）　Kwok（郭）\n(154)　62:14;70:2　I\n61:1\n98:9;107:18;108:11　14:21 ;48: 17,18,21　2:3;3:25;5: 16,22;　诉讼\n(I)　可能（I）\n意图\n(I)　Jillian（吉莉安）\n(I)　6:7,13,18,24;7:\n1,3,7,　78:25　I 12:17\n103: 11　2:19　20,25;8:3,9,14,15,23;　诉讼\n(I)　有限的\n(3)\n利益\n(I)　工作（I）　9: 1,10,13,24; 10:5,10,　9:24　~ 31:15;54:11;80:12\n107:23　42:16　.20;11:6,17,23;13:10;　律师\n(3)　行（2）\n感兴趣\n(3)　加入\n(I)　14:6,7,8,11,13,15,15,　39:8,9;50: 10　I 34:5;91 :24\n9:8;99:12,13　102:2　16,23,25; 15:4, 16,19;　律师\n(2)　行（3）\n利益\n(I)　Jones（琼斯）\n(I)　16:11;17:19,24;18:1,　54:12;69:5　I 38:13;91:21;108:2\n8:4　58:7　13;19:3,6,6,9,9, 17;　Leading\n(6)　列出（2）\nInternational（国际）\n(I)　判决书\n(9)　21:9, 12,24;22:4,8,13,　27: 13;54:3;66:6,9,　I 58:17;106:12\n58:10　4: 1;5: 1;6:22;9:2;　20,22,25;23:4;27:\n10,　11;74:7　听（I）\n,\n口译员\n(7)　11:9,10;24: 18;98: 10;　18;28: 14,23;29:3;　学习\n(4)　, 53: 18\n97: 10,12, 14,15, 18,　109:25　33: 13,20;37:24;38:5,　25:24;33:16;47:11;　诉讼\n(I)\n21;103:18　June（六月）\n(I)　14;39:1,11,14,19;　68:25　I\n102:13\n讯问\n(I)　78:21　40: 1;48: 13,13;51 :15;　获悉\n(6)　诉讼\n(3)\n49:19\n打断\n(2)　Justice（司法）\n(2)　59:4,4,12;60:9;61\n:5,　29:10;33:15,17;　152:13;101:19;\n91:2;94:8　7: 14;25:23　9,22;62: 16,19,24;　48: 12;64:23;70: 14　107:13\n打断\n(I)　K　63: 18;64:9;65:4, 14,　学习\n(2)　小（6）\n41:9　22;66:3,10;67:\n10,15,\n24;68:4,13,21 ;69:5;　25:24;31: I　' 47:7;51:10;56:16;\n进入（14）　Kathy（凯西）\n(10)　70:5,12,18;71 :6;　租赁\n(10)\n7: 10;62: 1;67:20,　I 57:10;92:3;105:15\n居住（3）\n12:22;19:11;24:10;　19: 1,6,7,12;21 :8;　73:6;74: 18;75:6;　22;68:7,10,16;70:\n13;　I\n49:2,3;98:3\n29:25;30:23;45:21,　22:8,11,20,23;64:\n14　76:6,12,17;78:25;　88:17,21　生活（6）\n25;66: 11;72: 10;76:7;　保留（2）　79: 12,21;80: 13;81:1,　至少（3）　17:18;25:7;83:12;\n85:11;86:22;92:11;　41 :9;88:4　6,22;82:2,10,23;　47:7;70: 16;95:21　93:7,9,10\n103:11　保留\n(I)　84:10;85:11,14,18;　离开\n(I)　生活\n(I)\n介绍\n(I)　59:21　86: 14,16;87:5;90: 10;　33:9　I 33:9\n25:9　关键（2）　95:10,11;97:9,11;　离开\n(2)　LLC（有限责任公司）\n(23)\n涉及（5）　5:22;23:25　98:2,20;99:3; 101: I,　42:17;50:5　6:11,11;34:18,18;\n27:24;35:11;38:8,　绑架\n(I)　17;104: 11;105:7,14,　留下（5）　37:4;61 :6,10;81: 12,\n9;86: 18　47:3　18,19; 1~6:20,22;　42: 17;47:9;49: 10,　14;85:5,6,7,15;86: 12,\n涉及\n(8)　被绑架\n(3)　107:4,8,12,14,17　10;51 :23　13,17,20;87:3,5,8;\n27:7;57: 12,14, 18;　42: 15;47:9;48:21　K-W-O-K\n(2)　剩余物\n(I)　105:13,14,17\n87:3,7,8;92:3　被杀\n(I)　18:1;98:2　51:24　LLC's（有限责任公司）\n(I)\nIra（艾拉）\n(I)　11:25　Kwok's（郭文贵的）\n(36)　法律的（8）　I 6: 11\n77:25　种类（3）　5: 14,17;8:2;9:5;　4:5; 10:I;25: 17, 19;　所在地\n(I)\n不相关的\n(I)　31 :5;34: 17;39:23　11:23;12:2;14:2;　26: I;31:6;53:20;　I 48:25\n67:13　种类\n(I)　17:21,23; 18:3, 15,24;　逻辑（I）\n不论\n(I)　37:12　19:1;23:7;48:11;　合法地\n(I)　L\n39:10\n90:1　Kingdom（王国）\n(I)　58:3;62:15,22;64:\n16,　87:13　London（伦敦）\n(I)\nIslands（岛屿）\n(I)　84:17　21,24;65:4,6;66:\n19;　长度\n(I)　! 83:12\ni\n\nMin-U-Script@（7） 询问 - London（伦敦）\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331　Case 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲） v.　Doc 404-17\nFiled 05/20/22　Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18　Page 119\nRECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　of 126　April 26, 2019\n\n长（5）\n47: 11;57:2,8;　许多（6）\n4:3; II: 16;44: 17;　38:6,6;39: 18;61: 12\n实质理由\n(8)　70:16　7: 14;8:9; 106:20\nI\n92: 16;108:21　50:5;57: 17;81: 19　10:13;12:17;24:3;　每月的\n(1)\n6:18　我自己（l）\n更长（4）　March（三月）\n(4)　102:4,12,16; 103:6;　月（7）　I 36:4\n神秘的\n(1)\n14:4;70: 17;102:23;　41 :24;43:6;63:4,5　109:21　44:17;45:19;49:11,　I 107:10\n103:24　Mark（马克）\n(3)　信息（3）　14,24;50: 12;78:23\n长期的\n(1)　2:21 ;72: 1;75:5　19:9,11;22:22　更多（23）　N\nI\n48:22　标记\n(2)　信息\n(1)　6: 1;9:22; 18:6,9;\n看（18）　77:22;89:6　10:7　20:9;25: 1;48: 10, 13,　I\n姓名（23）\n12:10;23: 12;25: 12;　市场\n(6)　信使\n(2)　14;49:14,24;50:11;　6:9;7: I; J 7:4,5,23,\n28:9,13;29:3,19;　6:3;55:7,11,12,18,　22:18,21　55: 14;59:25;83 :21,　25; 18:I;20: 19;56:9;\n32:11;41:19;53:14,　20　会见（4）　22;86:21 ;89:9;90: 16;　60: 14, 18;64: 16, 17,\n21 ;54:7;62:9;70: II;\n78: 16;92:2;93:2;95:6　已婚\n(1)　59:24;75:5; 102: 11;　94:19;102:9,15;　18;68: 14;74:4;80: 19;\n寻找（1）　50:3\n重要的\n(1)　107:23\nMichael（迈克尔）\n(4)　108:25\n早晨\n(10)　82:22;88:8;97: 15,15,\n50:15　8:18　56: 11;58:2;90:7,7　2:7,10,13,21,25;　25;98:3\n必然地\n(3)\n看起来（1）　事项\n(4)　中间\n(1)　3:6; 12: 12;47:24;　I 85: 16;86: 18;87:9\n40:20　2:2;24:22; 104: 1,20　71:2　52:25;56: 16　必要的\n(2)\n大量（19）　事项\n(1)　可能\n(2)　Moss（86）　I 14:7;61:1\n19:8;20:8,18;　97:23　53:6;98: 10　2:9,13,14,24;3:8,　需要（17）\n24: 16;27: I;31 :2;　可以（23）　Miles（迈尔斯）\n(7)　11,14;10:10,18;11:4,　6:23;10:2;11:15;\n42:8,20;47:8;48:\n18;　8:21 ;9:7; 19:19;　20: 17;21: 16,19,21,　20; 12: 10;16: 14, 19,　25 :9;32: 13;45 :2;\n49: 16;50:21 ;52: 19,　33:6;38: 1;41:4,22;　24;48: 13;59:4　22;17:11,18;19:19,　50: 13;53:7;54: 13;\n21;53: 17;54:9;75: 12;　43:5,13;47: 1;55:22;　Mileson\n(5)　24;23: 17,22;24: 12;　74: II ;76:21 ;77:9;\n98:6;99:3\n大量（2）　67: 10;70: 10;74: 18;　64: 16,20,21 ;82: 17;　28:4;34:3,8;38:22;　83:3;98:20; I07:3;\n29:21 ;51:24　75:11;77:16;83:18;\n86: 10;91 :24;95:6;　83:6\n百万（8）　41: 14;43: 13, 19;\n44: I0;46:7,1 0, 18;　47:20;54:3;55:\n14,17,　所需的\n(3)\n大声的（2）　104: 15;108:5; 109:2　21:2,7;22:4,23;　47:20;54:3;55:\n14,17,　所需的\n(3)\nI 2:7;32:8;67:5\n17:3;56:10　也许\n(3)　61:21;63:23,24;64:\n1　21 ;89:23;90:2,4,21,　需要（1）\n忠诚的（1）　12:4;53: 18;99: 1　百万\n(1)　24;91:6,11,17,20;　15:18\nI\n50:1　意味着（1I）　42:12　92: 1,7, 12,20,25;93:4,　谈判\n(1)\nLP\n(1)　35:2;36:22,24;　心思\n(1)　7,9,13,15,18,22;94:5;　I 27:25\n73:13　38: I, I,4;48: 10;　53:3　95: 15;96: 14, 16;97:9;　Neither（两者均不）\n(1)\n午餐（2）　52: 16;54: 19;67: I;　最低限度\n(1)　98:21,24;99:9,14,17;　I 4:25\n99:1,8　91: 18　106:21　100:5,9,13,19;104:2,　侄子\n(1)\nM　含义\n(2)　Minister（部长）\n(1)　5,9; 105: 15, 18,21 ,25;　I 48:20\n36:13;55:10\n手段\n(1)　84:17\n分钟\n(1)　106:6,11,15,18;　侄子们\n(1)\n主要的（2）　22:10　61:12　107:7,21\n最多（1）　I 48:15\n紧张的\n(9)\n104:9,10　会面（5）　分钟\n(5)　54:9　I 30: 19,20,22;31 :4,8,\nMainland（大陆）\n(1)　4:5;7:3; 16:1;50: I;　9:4;32: 19;39:6;　动议\n(1I)　22;36: 16, 18;47: 14\n49:2　107:24　58:19;91:9　5:18;8:18;11:21;　New（新）\n(34)\n主要地（1）　会议\n(7)　误读\n(1)　12:16; 13:21 ;23:8;　6: 11;9: 18;17:6,6;\n59:23　27:25;62:4,13;　7:14　25: 15;29:21 ;73: 13;　18:19;23:5;27:3;\n维护\n(3)　83:22,23,25;84:2　虚假陈述\n(6)　108:6,17　34: 15, 18,18,23;49:5,\n61: 18;62:20;81:4　会议\n(1)　7:7;8:8,17,19;9:\n19;　动议\n(3)　8;51: 12,17, 19,21,23;\n作出（2）　58:19　24:25　13:24;16:6,21　52: 1,2;56: 12, 12;\n9: 18;99: I　会面\n(1)　虚假陈述\n(1)　移动（8）　57: 12;59: I;86: 12, 14,\n作出\n(5)\n45:5;52: 16,17;　4:21\n成员\n(5)　8:9\n缺失（1）　3:2;46: 18, 19;49:5;　19,22;87:3;98:22,24;\n66:4;103:14　18:10,14;48:19;　95:6　56: 17;70:2;99:2;\n109:21　106:6,12,22\nNext（下一个）\n(9)\n渎职\n(1)　105:14,19　错误陈述\n(1)　移动\n(1)　6:5;7: 16;32:24;\n5:2　成员\n(2)　28:25　63:18　55:25;63: 14;88:24;\n管理\n(2)　18:13;57:16　嘲弄\n(1)　移动\n(1)　89:3;95: 15;97:8\n57:8;58:10　备忘录\n(1)　9:14　72:10　侄女（2）\n经理\n(3)　70:2　Mom（妈妈）\n(1)　很多\n(4)　I 48:15,19\n56:25;57:11,11　记载\n(1)　51:2　63:24;81 :3;97: 1;　Nine（九）\n(1)\n管理\n(1)　32:15　时刻\n(2)　103:24　I 57:5\n83:2　记忆\n(3)　30:2;83:17　多媒体\n(1)　吹毛求疵\n(1)\nMandarin（普通话）\n(4)\n30:25;97: 14, 17,21　7: I;30:22;42:23\n提及\n(3)　金钱（3）　13:2　I 62:9\nMannis（曼尼斯）\n(1)　22: 14;38:2;39:23　8:20;33:2;99: 13\n月份\n(5)　任何人（3）\n33:4,5;105:2\n65:1　提及\n(4)　50: 10;55: 19,19,20;　必须（3）　r\n一个（I）\n\nMin-U-Script@（8） 长 - None\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331　Case 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲） v.　Doc 404-17\nFiled 05/20/22　Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18　Page 120\nRECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　of 126　April 26, 2019\n\n81:5　关闭（9）　机会\n（2）　6:9; 11:17;28: 17,　当事人\n（4）\n正常\n（1）　20:11;24:23;47:10;　16:11;36:10　18,19;29:6,8;34:\n18;　13:5,18;44:5;90:20\n96:8　55:18,19;57:15;　反对方\n（1）　60:3,14,18;68:\n14;　合伙人\n（1）\n注释（4）　104:3,5,6　5:18　74:4;80:19;81:\n16,17,　58:7\n2:4,11;30:1;97:13　提出（14）　反对\n（3）　19;96:9; 105:7　部分（2）\n注明（1）　6:4;20: 19,24;21 :2,　12:1;23:8;25:15　拥有\n（9）　118:11;96:6\n59:2　10,13;22:5,12,17,23,　选择权\n（1）　7:25;8:5;27: 11,11;　当事人\n（13）\n注释（1）　25;23:23;78:\n12;　8:11　28:23;86: 13;95:8;　9:7,8;20:9;42: 16;\n63:4　92:23　口头\n（4）　105: 14, 17　47:3;48: 18;49: 16;\n通知（16）　提出\n（5）　44:2,16;102:6;　所有人\n（12）　50:6,14,20,25;86:\n17,\n76:17;85:11,16,17,　62:16,16;71:12;　109:12　30:6;79:21 ;80:22;　20\n19;98: 17,19;104:5,7,　96:14,16　命令\n（26）　81:8, 10;85: 15;86:2,　通过\n（1）\n10,11,12; 106: 17,24;　事后\n（1）　13:4;46: 14;75:22;　15;88:5,20; 105: 12;　131:21\n108:11;109:1　81:18　76:2,16;78:21 ;79:4;　106: 13　通过\n（2）\n注意到（1）　办公室\n（1）　80: 13;88:7;91 :5;　所有权\n（17）　122:22;47: 16\n96:2　52:2　98:7; 102:9,25;104:6,　8:4; 15:7,8, 10,13;　通行证\n（1）\n11月\n（1）　7,10,11,23;105:2;　28:6,8;29: 17;30: 15;　112:20\n70:18　17:9;27: 15;56:24;　106: 18,22,25,25;　32:21 ;39:2;85: 14;　护照\n（1）\n20:1　75: 13;76:5;77: 12;　107:2;108:2,15　86:3,12,17,20;105:23　50:17\n1\n编号\n（9）　2: 1;5:23,25; 12:18;　官员\n（5）　103:19,21　拥有\n（21）　Paul（保罗）\n（1）\n48: 13,16, 16;76:22;　53:20;78:8;97:\n12,　命令\n（2）　29:3,9;32: 1;33: 13,21,　暂停\n（4）\n91:23　17,21　11:10;102:21　21,24;34: 13,15,18,　4:23;24: 15;56: 1;\n旧的\n（3）　22;86: 13, 13,14;　1\n83:19\n1\n数字\n（2）　49:11,12;50:23　32:18　95: 12; 105: 18; 106:2,　PAX（2）\n91:21,24　O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）\n（4）　组织\n（1）　7　1\n12:2;73: 13\n2:14,15,18;69:1　53:24　支付\n（4）\nO　一次\n（2）　最初\n（2）　P　9:2;11:9;62:19;\n102:7;104:13　92:23;99:4　81:4\n异议（4）　一\n（53）　Ostrager（奥斯特拉格）\n（2）　Pacific（太平洋）\n（1）　付款\n（1）\n14:10;71: 17;89:21;　4: 18,18,23;5:23;　7:14;25:23　2:2　8:22\n94:19　10:18;11:20;13:9;　其他人\n（3）　包裹\n（3）　人员\n（16）\n异议\n（31）　15:1; 18:9,13, 14, 18;　53:23,24;54:2　58:21,21,22　18:6,9;22: 18;27:5,\n23:23;24: 13;26:8;　22:4;24: 1, 15;29: 13;　否则\n（1）　页\n（18）　9;28:2,3;31: 14, 18;\n27: 13;28:25;32:9;　32:8,13;41: 18;42:2,　108:13　20: 17;21 :20;26:6;　39:23;42:6;48:\n13;\n41 :8;43:20,20,25;　10,11 ;44:5;45:9, 13;　应当\n（1）　29: 19;31 :25;34:5;　67:4,4,7;81: 19\n54:3;60:5,20,22;　47: 15;49: 10;50:23;　71: 16　38: 12;39:25;40: 15,　人民的\n（1）\n62:6;63: 11 ;66:6;　51: 1;55: 14,19, 19,20;　我们自己\n（2）　22,23,24;69:\n17;　131:16\n67: 12;68:9;70:7;　62: 15;66: 19;74: 1;　外出\n（12）　78: 17;91: 16,20,23;　百分比\n（3）\n71: 11;72:9, 18;74:5,　77:4;83:21,22;84:16;　4:2; 19:8;44:2;　页\n（2）　35: 18;36:8;45:4\n1\n14,16,20;78: 15;　85:6,6;96:24;98:8;　47: 12;53:22;68:22;　42:11,12　Perfect（完美）\n（1）\n94:14,17,23　100:22;103:19;　70:22;85: 19;89:3;　已支付\n（1）　或许\n（1）\n异议\n（13）　104: 10,21;105:5,9,　91: 16;95:3; 100:21　52: 17　89:5\n10:12;12:20;15:24;　18,20; 108:5　单日\n（1）　概述\n（1）　文件\n（6）　期间\n（4）.\n89:7,14,19;90: 1;　45:24　99:2　28:6,8;30:9;31\n:7;　61:18;66:1;70:15;\n92:9;93:24;94:9;　复数形式\n（2）　州外\n（1）　43:1;90:20　80:12\n95:3,19,21　41:18;96:5　93:14　文件\n（11）　伪证\n（1）\n义务\n（1）　持续进行\n（1）　外部\n（1）　7:12,15;12:1;　5:16\n6:19　24:3　45:13　29: 17,21;46:2;69: 1,4,　困惑\n（1）\n获得\n（4）　仅\n（13）　未清偿\n（1）　4;76: 11,15　92:3\n22: 10,15;45:8,8　2:8;31: 19;47:6;　52:21　段落\n（6）　人\n（17）\n避免\n（1）　59:20;83:7,8;91:\n14;　超过\n（4）　28:24;54: 15, 17,20,　18:7;19:5;35:17;\n108:3　92: 14;93:25;94:3;　41: 18;51:22;57: 10;　21;78:17　42:5,14;47:7;50:\n1;\n显然\n（4）　102: 17;105:22;106:3　79:12　父母\n（1）　66:4,21,22;67:2;\n22: 17;24:8,14;.　107:22　开场\n（3）　驳回\n（4）　48:15　81:6;82: 18,20,21;\n占用\n（6）　3:9;9:4;100:21　27: 14;94:21,25;　部分\n（6）　84: 10;88: 17\n61:23;67: 17,18,24;　运营\n（2）　95:22　5:24; 16: 10;53: 10,　个人的\n（42）\n68:7,18　52:3,5　概览\n（1）　12;89:22;96: 1　22: 15, 16,19;26:24;\n发生\n（1）　Operating（运营）\n（3）　3:16　特定的\n（3）　27:7,21;28:1;29:11;\n96:6　56:24;76:5;78:9　欠付\n（1）　24:1;46:4;61:13　30: 18;31 :20;32:20;\n时\n（1）　运营\n（2）　107:5　尤其\n（1）　33:3,11;34: 14;35:3,9,\n99:16　52:15,16　自己的\n（19）　72:3　11,18,22,24;36: 1,5,7,\n\nMin-U-Script@（9）正常—个人的\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331　案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉　文件 404-17\n已提交 05/20/22　已录入 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 121 页\nNYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　共 126 页　第\n26, 2019\n\n13,22;37:6,9,13,15,　2:4,11;17:3;21:16,　更可取的\n（1）　15:23;104:10;　45:14\n20;43:9;49: 18;53: 1;\n54:8,16,18,22;55:9;　18,21;26:7;40: 10;　46:19　105:5　拉出\n（1）\n62:7;67: 18;68: 19;　56:9;69: 17;74:2;\n97:12,25　优先权\n（1）\n77:1　进行\n（7）　45:13\n84:3　质押\n（37）　判决前\n（1）　2:8;16:17;41:19;\n94: 15; 100:3; 107:25;　购买\n（19）\n8:20; 15:3;33:2,8,\n亲自\n（4）　24:4,5,15,19;38:2,　44:17　108:4　11;44:3;57: 12;58:4,\n27:22;37:23;61 :25;　7,10;41 :2,4,22;43 :6,　不利影响\n（2）　程序\n（3）　12;59:7;61 :3, 14;\n67:24　10;44:9,11,18,21;　108:10,23　9: 14;25:20;46: 14　62: 15;83:23;86: 19,\n人员\n（1）　45:1,6,11,18,19;46:3,　受到不利影响\n（1）　程序\n（3）　22;87:7;90: 10, 13\n108:11　6,11,12,14;47: 14;　107:20　9: 19;56:2;83:20　已购买\n（11）\n电话\n（1）　68:8,20;72:5;76:\n12;　预先标记的\n（1）　过程\n（10）：\n27:22,23;33:10;\n84:1　79:3; 101:20,21 ,23;　76:25　6:7;10:1;57:13;　65: 15;67: 15;68: 13;\n表述\n（1）　107:12;108:12　准备\n（1）　58: 14;59: 13;62:25;　70:12;81:6,13;101:1;\n103:10　已质押\n（24）　106:25　65: 13, 16,17;84: 13　107:8\n1\n碎片\n（1）　7:9,13;24:20;　已准备\n（2）　制作\n（1）　购买人\n（4）\n43:1　37: 19;39: 12,15,20;　9:15;103:15　15:25　8:25;60:17;63:15;\n刺破\n（14）\n4: 15,15,24;5:7,8,9;　40:2,5,19;41 :21;43:5,　出席\n（2）　专业的\n（2）　64:5\n1\n100:7,16,18,22;　8,8;68:21 ;69:3 ;70:6,\n13,17,19,23; 101:18;　90:23;96:12\n陈述\n（6）　47:5,6\n项目\n（1）　购买人\n（1）\n102:20,25; 103: 12, 16　105:1,9　13:3,22; 16:4;84:3;　42:9　85:5\n购买\n（1）\nPing（平）\n（1）　质押\n（15）　89:4,22　证明\n（2）　57:18\n17:5　5:23;7:8;24: 17,23,　（4）\n已陈述　4:19;103:2　购买—出售\n（1）\n地点\n（3）　25;37:3,16,25;38:5,　12:19;13:5;88:11;　适当的\n（2）　87:6\n45:6; 104:6; 109:2　15;44: 1,6,7;45: 16;　97:5　15:22;24:9　购买\n（3）\n已放置\n（1）　105:3　目前\n（1）　财产\n（4）　14:2;58:16;64:6\n76:12　质押\n（2）　109:10　58: 17;87:4;98: 12;　纯粹地\n（1）\n地点\n（1）　37:22;106:24　President（总统）\n（15）　107:23　104:4\n48:25　加\n（3）　6:6;7: 18;27:3;　提议\n（1）　声称的\n（2）\n明白地\n（1）　31: 13;36: 15;67: 19　51: 16;52: 11;56:23;　100:3　60:10,14\n11:7　下午\n（2）　57:24,25;58: 1,3;59:1,　提议\n（2）　意图\n（1）\n原告\n（8）\n2: 14,16, 18; 10:2;　99:24; 103:22　22;78:9;90:8;93:\n10　100: 18,20　60:3\n102:10,19;103:25;　口袋\n（1）\n109:8　推定\n（1）　专有的\n（9）　目的\n（3）\n107:5　要点\n（12）　79:11\n借口\n（1）　62: 1;67:20,21;\n68:6,10,16;70: 13;　9:8,10;73:12\n原告\n（16）　5:5; 13:25;44:5,5,6;　107:9　88: 17,21　目的\n（2）\n12:15;25:8\n13:22; 14:13;16:3,　45:9,15,19;47:\n14;　相当\n（1）　预期的\n（2）　依据\n（1）\n10;76:3;78:24;79:6,　95:25; 104:14;108: 16　12:7　60:16;63:15　1\n45:22\n7;89:6;97:2; 100:3,7;　要点\n（1）　先前\n（4）　保护\n（1）　放置\n（25）\n102:1, 14,25; 109:8　95:19　2:6;28: 16,19;52:20　62:20　3:4;4:2;6:2,15;\n原告\n（2）　政治的\n（1）　价格\n（1）　保护\n（1）　13:10;19:11;20:19,\n14:5;98:11　107: 10　58:18　102:10　23;24: 19;25:2;26:23;\n计划\n（1）　部分\n（5）　主要的\n（2）　自豪的\n（1）　41 :23;42:20;48: 18,\n38:3　21:18,21;92:15;　13:9;84:17　52:24　21 ;54: 12;58:20,21,\n扮演\n（10）　96:20;97:1　本金\n（1）　证明\n（10）　22;62:24;89:20,23,\n9:5; 10:4; 11:14,14;　部分\n（6）　5:17　4:9,10,14,25;5:4,9,　25;91:7;103:15\n13:15;28:4;92: 14,16;　12:23;89:7,19;　先前的\n（8）　21;7:15;12:16;　放置\n（3）\n93:25;96:20\n扮演\n（13）　92: 10;93:21 ;96:22　5:18;11:21;25:6;　100:22　12:11;57:14;79:10\n10:9,17;11:3,19;　职位\n（10）\n42: 18;56:22;57:2;　26: 18,19;53:9;62:14;　提供\n（8）　PX（6）\n12:5,9;28:5;91: 1;　72:25;88:21; 100:6,　优先权\n（2）　3:15;13:4;17:13;\n59: 15;60: 13;65: 13;　19:24;23:17;43:19;\n94: 16,22;95: 1, 14;　14;101:1,8,24　24:7,22　104:12;106:20　46:24;69:8,12\n\n96:23　可能的\n（1）　囚犯\n（1）　已提供\n（11）\n扮演\n（10）　50:14　107:10　7:20;59: 18, 19,20;　Q\n1\n90:6;91:5,8,12,13,　潜在的\n（3）　概率\n（1）　65: 14,15;69: 13;　质量\n（1）\n16;92: 15;93: 16;94: 1;　4: 1; 107: 12;109: 1　3:19　78:20;80:4;81:\n1;　92:2\n96:22　实际的\n（2）　可能\n（4）　98:18　迅速的\n（3）\n认罪答辩\n（1）　103:25;104:20　31 :23;92: 13;96: 10;　规定\n（1）　48:2;87:24;95:\n\n100:15　惯例\n（1）　99:9　102:9　迅速地\n（4）\n诉状\n（1）　65:20　问题\n（8）　公众\n（2）　3:3;11:25;53:21;\n24:9　排除\n（1）　4:18;7: 10;24:7;　6:1;9: 12　73:5\n\n寒暄\n（2）　106:22　104:9; 105:6; 108: 19,　公开地\n（1）　安静地\n（1）\n83:7,8\n请\n（13）　偏好\n（1）　21,22　8:3　11:25\n107:22　问题\n（3）　拉\n（1）　退出\n（1）\n\nMin-U-Script@（10）亲自—退出\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331　案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉　文件 404-17\n已提交 05/20/22　已录入 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 122 页\nNYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　共 126 页　第\n26, 2019\n\n42:16　18:25;102:1　3:2,9　6:21　裁定 (1)\n相当 (5)　休庭 (2)　记得\n(13)　回应\n(6)　103:4\n33:22;35:3;52:25;　56:5;99:25　5:23;31:4,9,23;　10:7;16:14;46:7;　裁定\n(1)\n91:15;92:12　承认\n(3)　38:7;39:21;42:2,10;　65:8,11;71:10　103:6\n已离职\n(1)　15:16;31:16;47:15　43:12;46:25;61:19;　已回应\n(3)　正在进行\n(1)\n51:24　记忆\n(2)　63:7;84:7　71:15,18;82:9　109:8\n引用\n(1)　21:2;66:13　移除\n(3)　回应\n(5)　Russ（拉斯） (2)\n11:21　建议\n(1)　98:13;101:21,24　71:6;72:2,4,24;　2:19,22\n90:13　作出\n(1)　86:7\nR　建议\n(1)　98:11　职责\n(3)　S\n7:23　续期 (2)　52:4,7,10\n提出 (1)　调和\n(1)　108:7,24　责任\n(2)\n保障措施\n(4)\n15:23　72:23　Renminbi（人民币）\n(1)　36:7;52:12\n6:16,23;61:14,16\n提出 (2)　记录\n(6)　59:23　负责\n(7)　出售 (9)\n14:1;102:6　2:5;3:4,7;29:25;　重复\n(1)　8:22;31:19;35:18,　15:2;44:3;75:24,\n而非\n(2)　74:7;95:25　47:1　23,25;36:8;58:11　24;76:7;86:19,22;\n35:4,12　记录\n(2)　重复\n(1)　回应性的\n(1)　87:8;104:13\n达到 (3)　88:4;106:13　8:16　51:6　销售 (2)\n4:2;19:8;102:24　删节\n(1)　书记员\n(2)　其余 (1)　57:18;105:4\n阅读 (27)　20:19　99:21,22　101:25　相同 (7)\n13:8,12,18;15:1,5;　再次直接询问\n(3)　代表\n(2)　结果\n(1)　5:7;6:23;17:25;\n19:7,10;21:7,16,18,　55:16;74:24;84:22　75:6;103:6　61:14　35:15;43:24;73:18;\n21;22:1;26:11,21;　提及\n(5)　陈述\n(2)　揭示 (1)　103:3\n30:5;31:6,12;34:4,　4:22;53:7;84:3,14,　44:25;45:5　109:4　Sarnoff（萨尔诺夫）\n(24)\n20;38:12;53:14,19;　16　代表\n(1)　审查 (4)　2:15,15;56:15;\n69:2,19;72:17,19;　刷新\n(1)　10:22　42:21;53:14,16;　59:2;60:24;61:4;\n89:8　66:13　代表\n(3)　58:19　66:12;69:14;70:3,10;\n阅读\n(6)　已刷新\n(1)　7:7;65:25;66:20　已审查\n(3)　71:21;72:1,11,14,20,\n34:5,8;41:10;　21:1　由……代理\n(1)　7:19;79:18;90:12　22;74:10,23;78:15;\n47:12;89:14;97:4　拒绝 (1)　7:9　审查中\n(2)　84:23;85:3;92:\n18;\n读本\n(2)　32:10　代表\n(1)　3:15;58:12　108:5,14\n12:25;13:6　已拒绝\n(3)　70:5　权利\n(82)　就座 (1)\n真实 (3)　11:17;13:11;32:6　请求\n(6)　3:10;6:2;17:19,25;\n62:13\n13:14;16:8;47:6　关于\n(5)　10:8;64:3,24;65:3,　18:16,19,22;19:1,4,　满足 (1)\n已意识到\n(1)　78:1,2;103:5,15;　9;66:18　17;20:1,4,24;21:3,7,　98:7\n101:20　107:18　已请求\n(5)　9,10,24;22:1,5,7,22,　保留 (1)\n确实 (10)　已登记\n(1)　28:2;32:12;33:6,　25;23:4,10,18;25:\n15,　89:5\n9:16;13:16;25:9;　88:12　反刍\n(2)　18;100:9　看见 (11)\n36:13;42:21,25;　47:16;87:20,23;　13:23;46:1　请求\n(3)　19;28:7;29:16;30:15;　7:12;13:10;21:23;\n95:12　重新介绍\n(1)　所需\n(4)　10,14;34:13,16;36:7,　22:11;28:6,8;41:1;\n理由\n(3)　16:5　5:5;58:21;76:17;　17,21;37:5,16,19,22,　46:20,24;59:20;69:4\n10:22;48:21;98:6　重申\n(1)　80:24　25;40:16,19,24;41:4,　称述 (9)\n理由\n(4)　16:4　要求\n(3)　19;42:23;46:17,21;　11:23;13:13;21:9;\n6:23;49:25;63:7;　(1)\n驳回　3:24;4:25;75:23　47:20;48:16;55:7;　26:3;37:1;47:10;\n103:10　88:13　重新登记\n(1)　62:17;69:6;76:13;　50:18,22;109:20\n重新登船 (1)　相关\n(1)　88:8　79:25;84:18;90:24;　学校 (2)\n49:12;50:2\n65:17　108:5　保留\n(1)　91:21;92:12;93:3,6;　范围界定\n(1)\n回忆 (24)　已释放\n(4)　74:23　94:15;98:5;99:7,11;　10:11\n29:22,23;30:3,11;　44:21;45:1,6,11　住所\n(9)　100:2,17;103:17;　搜索\n(1)\n32:3;34:1,10,25;　相关性\n(12)　101:2,18,21;　104:11　10:7\n38:17;40:7;42:23;　24:13;43:20,24;　104:14;107:9,12,16,　角色 (3)　Searles（西尔斯）\n(40)\n59:9,17;60:16;61:16,　46:4,8;60:23;62:8,　19;108:13　52:11;57:11,12　2:19,19;23:25;\n22;62:21;63:21,23;　10;68:12;94:9,13,24　居住\n(1)　Roscalitar（罗斯卡利塔尔）\n(1)　26:8,11;27:13;28:25;\n64:13,14;66:2,18;　相关\n(9)　93:10　41:2　32:9,12,25;41:8,17;\n68:6　11:8;12:21;24:24;　已解决\n(2)　大约\n(2)　43:17,24;44:14,23;\n收到 (2)　25:1;60:6;63:12,13;　38:3;42:25　57:17;63:23　45:4;47:23;48:\n1;\n85:10,11　71:19;95:12　解决中\n(1)　规则 (2)　53:5;54:5;55:2,13;\n已收到\n(11)　所依赖 (2)　16:1　24:23;92:10　89:16,25;90:3;91:2,\n6:4;20:14;49:15;　5:19;7:22　尊重\n(7)　已裁定\n(1)　10,14,18,23;92:22;\n64:25;72:3,12;78:14;　救济 (2)　24:4;43:25;71:9;　26:10　94:7,13;95:18,24;\n79:3,6,12;80:6　109:13,15　73:1;74:\n15;100:7,25　规则 (2)　96:13,17,24;97:6\n最近\n(2)　评论\n(2)　谨此\n(1)　68:19;94:6　座位 (2)\n\nMin-U-Script@（11） 相当－座位\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　文件 404-17\n提交于 05/20/22　录入于 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 123 页\n\n共 126 页　NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\nApril 26, 2019（2019年4月26日）\n56:13;98:4　设定 (2)　67:21,24;68:4,16,18,　64:16,21,24;65:4,6,　州\n(4)\n\n就座 (1)　16:6;46:2　19;69:5;75:24;78:6　12;66:4,21,24,24;　117:4;56:9;97:25;\n17:7　七 (4)　重大\n(4)　67:8;82:4,18;83:5;　98:13\n第二 (16)　9:4;18:6,7;48:14　8:16;9:22;10:11;　107:16　已陈述\n(1)\n4:14,18;5:2;30:18,　数个\n(2)　21:6　儿子的\n(1)　68:7\n24,25;48:2;50:3,4;　3:1;75:10　显著地\n(1)　7:1　陈述\n(6)\n53:17;78:17;83:23;　摇晃\n(1)　抱歉\n(28)\n99:6　26:18,19;30:14;\n96:24;104:18;　31:12　签署\n(1)　20:10,11;36:15,18,　40:18;46:13;50:18\n109:13,16　贝壳 (2)　67:19　相似\n(1)　19;39:13;40:23;51:5,　陈述\n(3)\n保密 (1)　8:21;10:19　Sherry（谢里）\n(4)　6:23　8,8,8,8;52:9;54:25;　26:24;35:15;37:8\n7:2　隐匿\n(1)　57:3;81:19,22;　同样地\n(1)　55:1,1;66:8;68:13;　州\n(3)\n98:12　109:24\n6:21　91:2;93:8;94:18;　地位\n(1)\n章节 (2)　Sherry-Netherland（谢里-内瑟兰酒店）\n(69)　简单 (2)　98:23;100:12;101:6　99:1\n96:4,9　6:6,8,15;7:8,11,12,　11:2;43:3　种类 (2)　步骤 (2)\n确保\n(1)　17,21;8:5,7,11,19;　单一 (1)　59:12;108:7　48:1;55:22\n62:3　15:3;20:20;56:21;　28:6　寻求\n(3)　仍然 (6)\n安全\n(11)　57:19,21;58:11;59:7;　Sister（姐妹）\n(2)　63:19;64:6;86:3\n25:24;29:7;30:20;\n6:16;61:17,19;　60:9,13,17,25;61:3,6,　50:12,16　声音\n(2)　47:15;48:17;103:7\n63:19,24;64:7;67:17,　13;63:10;64:2,5;　嫂子或弟媳\n(2)　13:5;15:15　约定\n(4)\n18;80:24;81:1,3　65:8,11;67:21;68:3,　48:16,20　听起来\n(1)　12:15;44:11,14,15\n看见 (2)　20;70:19;71:18;72:3,　坐 (3)　24:12　已约定\n(8)\n9:20;49:23　4,16,24;76:6;78:\n10;　30:21;38:8;39:6　发言\n(8)　3:5,18;12:14,18,21,\n寻求\n(3)　79:22;82:9;85:10,16,　位于\n(1)\n47:7,24;53:\n19,23;　22;46:6;70:16\n14:17;108:10;　24,25;86:5,21;87:16;　6:22　60:6;75:20;83:8;89:3　约定中\n(1)\n109:9　88:1,4,9,13,16,19;　情形\n(3)　发言\n(3)　46:2\n似乎 (1)　90:9;93:3;98:\n15,16,　31:24;39:5;50:5　49:1;53:18;54:16　约定\n(2)\n83:11　17;101:2,5,9;104:\n16,　情形\n(1)　发言\n(3)　24:2;45:1\n似乎 (1)\n23;106:5,13　65:20　六 (3)　花费 (1)　72:13;82:25;83:1　股票 (3)\n83:14　Sherry-Netherland's（谢里-内瑟兰酒店的）\n(1)　48:17;49:11;50:23　47:11　88:1,7,12\n选择 (2)　72:23　48:17;49:11;50:23　停止 (1)\n89:19;91:11　Sherry's（谢里的）\n(1)　尺寸 (1)　已说\n(1)　50:11\n选择\n(1)　88:21　62:3　54:2　已停止\n(3)\n\n94:1　船 (1)　跳过 (1)　已说\n(3)　49:13,22,23\n出售 (12)　57:15　59:3　83:5,10;89:17　直截了当\n(1)\n5:25;11:24;14:3;　震惊 (1)　幻灯片 (2)　Spring（斯普林）\n(13)　24:25\n18:25;19:17;85:12;　88:5　4:4;28:13　23:5;27:3;42:7;　策略\n(1)\n87:4;98:18;104:15;　短暂\n(4)　Sloane（斯隆） (13)\n47:2;51:16,19,21,23;　38:3\n106:16;107:18;　3:16;9:3;63:16;　19:1,4,6,8,12,16,　52:1,1,11,22;53:24　Street（街）\n(2)\n108:12　102:22　25;21:8;22:8,11,20,　争吵\n(1)　17:6;56:12\n出售中 (2)　不久\n(2)　23;64:14　96:19　更强\n(1)\n19:4;58:16　64:6;70:22　小 (1)　阶段 (1)　9:22\n出售 (1)　显示 (18)　18:8　103:2　结构\n(4)\n87:5　8:14,16,18,20;　已售 (1)　站立\n(5)\n6:18;61:6,10;86:12\n发送 (2)　9:15;13:14;31:5,9,　55:5　14:9;25:4;32:23;　Stuart（斯图尔特）\n(1)\n19:8,11　10;42:11,22;47:13;　出售 (2)　55:24;89:1　2:15\n意义 (3)　60:9;61:12;66:12;　105:14,19　标准\n(9)　学习过\n(1)\n96:8;97:1;99:1　71:21;74:3;90:16　已解决 (1)　3:17;4:5,21,24,25;　50:3\n敏感\n(1)　显示\n(3)　108:21　5:24;7:3;11:8;65:19\n东西 (1)\n21:5　6:8;8:1;31:11　某人\n(10)　标准\n(4)　47:10\n已发送 (3)　显示中\n(4)　13:15;81:13;84:8;　4:24;102:11;103:2,　主题\n(7)\n20:14;59:24;69:5　6:20;43:17;60:17,　87:25;88:11,12,13;　14:18,20;24:2;\n单独\n(3)　18　104:15;105:8;109:17　资格\n(1)　68:11;71:18,19;\n36:20,25;37:2　Shui（水） (1)　不知何故\n(1)　51:2　100:4\n\n顺序\n(1)　63:7　30:23　凝视\n(1)　提交 (3)\n92:6　侧面 (1)　某人\n(7)　36:16　6:21;58:23;89:5\n严重\n(2)　90:1　8:9;20:19,23;64:9;　开始\n(13)　已提交\n(16)\n4:17;26:1　签名 (2)　82:3;83:3;84:3　3:11,14;28:2;48:4,\n送达 (2)　5:17;13:24;15:2;\n54:13;61:23　有时\n(2)　8;49:5;51:25;52:2,　23:2;25:14,22;41:20;\n69:1;76:11　签字\n(1)　19:15;36:15　22;76:20;89:13;99:5;　43:4;53:15,25;60:2;\n设定 (7)　78:7　儿子 (24)　102:12　84:13,16;90:11;\n已签署\n(12)　48:14,19;49:9,10,　已开始\n(3)　101:4,8\n\n2:7,8;10:20,24;\n65:3;85:18;102:7　15:4;42:2;54:10;　13,21,23;50:23;51:1;　28:9;48:6;91:\n18　提交中\n(2)\n\nMin-U-Script@（12） 就座－提交中\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉　文件 404-17\n提交于 05/20/22　录入于 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 124 页\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　共 126 页　26, 2019\nApril\n\n53:9;65:22　(3)\n宣誓　17:2;28:22;32:22;　103:14;107:3　3:6;6:25; 10: 10;\n教唆作伪证\n(I)　26:4;43:5,7　38:20;52:25;56:8;　今日的\n(I)　31:12\n我\n5:16　切换\n(I)　74:3;97:20　13:22　真实的 (5)\n传票\n(I)　55:2　作证 (I)　一起\n(7)　I 76:15;97:24;101:2,\n14:6　(6)\n宣誓　15:16　18:9;50:3;57: 14;　9,13\n我\n被传唤\n(2)　5: 19;28: 16;41:21;　作证 (8)　58:20,22,22;79:\n10　信托\n(7)\n73:16,17　43: II ;44: 11;46: 10　5:11;6:7,10,24;7:6,　告知 (25)　I 6:25;64: 17,19,24;\n后续的\n(I)　(12)\n宣誓的　16;73:15;95:7　2:6;7: 13;8:5,6;　65:6;66:24;81: 17\n70:15　17: 1,9;25:6;26: 18,　(2)\n正在作证　10:6;22:11,13,23;　受托人\n(2)\n随后\n(I)　19;27: 10;28: 19;35:6;　32:23;62:7　33:4,5;36:5;39:4,19,　I 58:8,9\n59:25　37:8;56:7;97: 18,19　(41)\n证词　21,22,23;40: 1,4;　真相\n(5)\n成功 (I)　5: 14;8:2,5;9:4,7,9,　49:20;50:4,12,19;　I 5:22;23:24;73:23;\n12:17　T　9; 13:4; 16:18;25:6,7;　65: 12;72: 16;82:9　95: 12;97:23\n成功 (I)　26: 12,13;28:21 ;29:I;　Tony（托尼） (1)　尝试 (13)\n3:19　桌子 (3)　32:17;37:11,12;　84:17　10:7;27:5;31: 14;\n起诉 (I)　21 :2;24:23;47: 10　54: 14;62: 10;66: 13,　采取 (4)　33:6;43:3;46: 14;\n73:8　Taiwan（台湾）\n(2)　15;71: 17;73: 10,21,　2:8;12:1;51:22;　47:7,24;53:22;56: 17;\n充分的\n(2)　,\n84:6,7　25;74:6,9;79:9;　73:1　73: 12;99:2,3\n5:1;100:15\n(2)\n建议　故事 (1)　86:25;90: 15,18,25;　顶部 (3)　正在尝试\n(II)\n95:10　93: I;94:9,20;95:4;　6: 11;21: 15;104:21　3: 15;10: 13;24:22;\n100:21;108:21　交谈 (5)　96:4; 101:13;105:6,7　主题 (3)　27:8;36:18;47:11,18;\n概述\n(I)　7:4;10:14;13:11;　他们的\n(2)　10:18; 11:2;55:2　50:9;67: II ;74: 19;\n73:25　18:24;38:5　45:10,11　Tor（洋葱路由器） (I)　109:22\n概述过\n(I)　谈过\n(3)　因此\n(3)　97:15　Tsang（曾）\n(I)\n74: 11　5:8;11:4,5　93:16;101:12;　T-O-R\n(I)　j\n82:22\n正在概述\n(2)　(7)\n谈话　108:6　97:15　骨灰瓮 (3)\n74:6;94:19　27:21 ;43:2;49: 13,　(6)\n第三　总计 (2)　I 40:10;89:3;105:17\n太阳 (I)　22,23;50:11;53:22　8:11;13:20;45:25;　9:4; 18:7　转身\n(I)\n107:3　谈话 (I)　50:9;53: 17;86:20　完全地\n(2)　I 79:12\n超级\n(6)　24:17　(4)\n尽管　18:9;30:23　两次 (2)\n30: 19;31:3,7,22;　录音带 (12)　32:7;35:6;45: 15;　(3)\n触及　I 16:6,21\n36:16;47:13　10:9,17;11:3,19;　86:21　67:5;83:3,3　扭曲 (I)\n提供\n(I)　12:9;28:5;49: 17;　(8)\n认为　(2)\n追踪　I 24:22\n78:24　91: 1;94: 16,22;95: 1,　4:6,11;12:4,7;　51: 10;52:23　两个 (30)\n支持\n(6)　14　20: 18;62: 18;91:3;　交易\n(1)　4: 15,23;5:22,25;\n4:5,20;23:7;25: 14;　任务 (1)　108:20　57:17　6: 10;7: 19,24; I0: 19,\n40: 18;84:4　12:1　数千\n(1)　记录文本\n(6)　21 ;13:24; 16:6;22: 18;\n(2)\n理应　团队 (I)　42:12　12:24; 13:3;34:4;　28:24;36:20,25;37: I,\n8:25;52: 18　(3)\n52:12　威胁　89:6,8;92:21　12;42: 11;43: I;46:2;\n据称\n(I)　技术性的\n(1)　42: 16;49: 18;50:7　记录文本\n(3)　49:25;53:3;78: 18,23;\n11:24　31:6　受到威胁\n(1)　12:23,23;13:6　84:24;90: 19;95: 18;\n最高\n(I)　准备好 (1)　48:21　转移\n(21)　99: 15;I00: 14;104:20\n25:23　9:3　三个\n(4)　6:25;7:2;64: 15,20,　类型 (4)\n当然 (II)　电话的\n(I)　3:18;43:1;67:19;　24;65:2,3,22;66:23;　I 58:24;59: 17;63:9,9\n3:8;5:25;31: 17;　83:25　108: 11　85:24;86:3,19;87:8,　典型的\n(4)\n33:24;35:3,20;52:17,　告知 (2)　贯穿\n(I)　12;98: 19;101 :20;　I 59:12;63:10,14;\n17;57: 15;62: 10;　5:22;99:8　9:19　105:4,23;106:3;　74:15\n99:17　十 (1)　时间线\n(1)　108:13;109:1　打字\n(1)\n惊讶的\n(I)　39:6　62:22　已转移\n(8)　I 63:9\n109:11　(3)\n租户　次数 (3)　85: 14;86: 17;87: 16;\n暂停\n(I)　61 :6,9;80: 15　3:1;11:16;50:5　88:8,12;95:8;98: 15;　U\n108:7　(2)\n任期　时机 (3)　104:22　I\n暂停\n(1)　57:19;61:5　44:3;45: 18;63:9　正在转移\n(3)　t\nUllman（厄尔曼）\n(18)\n108:16　(2)\n期限　标题 (6)　64: 10;82:3; 106:23　6:5,5, I0, 14,24;7:4,\n维持\n(I)　53: 1;54:22　56:23;64: 10;66:24;　转移\n(2)　6;56:11,16;74:22;\n14:10　(6)\n终止　105:24;106:3,9　104:18;105:3　75:3,7,22;76: 15;\n维持\n(10)　41 :23;43:6,10,11;　今天 (25)　过境\n(I)\n60:8;67: 14;70:9,9,　77:22;78: 16;85: I;\n44:12;46:12　3: 15;4:9, 19;5:5,10,　17: 12　87:25\n9;73:2,3;74:8,17,21　条款\n(2)　12,21;11:14;12:11;　(3)\n翻译　最终的\n(5)\n宣誓 (2)　16:15;58:18　13:8,25;14:6; 16:3,7;　15:13;19:10,11　174:1;85:15;86:14;\n27: 17;97:22　可怕的\n(I)　24: 16;25:7;44:3;　(2)\n翻译员　102:15;103:3\n已宣誓\n(I)　II: 13　71:20;73: 12,23;94:1;　5: 14;32:7　最终\n(I)\n36:9　(8)\n作证过　98:25; 100:23;　(4)\n尝试过　I 33:2'.\n\n(13) 教唆作伪证－最终\n\n提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM　索引号 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331　案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉　文件 404-17\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　提交 05/20/22　录入 05/20/22 11:52:18　第 125 页\nNYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019\n郭文贵　共 126 页　2019 年 4 月 26 日\n我\n无法获得\n(2)　29:8;50:10　101:23;103:9　16;27: 16;29:5,7, 12,　年 (3)\n93:13;96:7　Vice（副） (3)　WeChat（微信）\n(1)　14;32: 12,20,23;39:3;　I 42:3;46:11;63:22\n无条件地\n(1)　6:6;56:23;78:8　49:23　43: 15;51 :5,8;54:5,6,　年 (11)\n8:23　视频 (22)　周 (1)　8;55: 1,23,24,25;56:3,　15:8,8;18:21;\n根据\n(7)　7: 17;9: 15; 10:9, 17;　7:19　11;66:9,11,12;67:3;　49:11,12;50:23;57:5,\n3:23,24;5:24;9:6;　11:3,19;12:9;28:5;　Wei（魏） (5)　68:23;69: 16;70: 14,　10;59: I;62: 18;75: 10\n104:11;107:9;108:14　49:24;50: 17,21 ,22,　105:6,8,8,9; 107: 10　22,25;71 :2,4,24;　York（约克） (29)\n基础的\n(1)　25;89:4,22;90:\n16;　W-E-I\n(1)　75: 15;77:17,21 ;86: I,　6: II ;9: 18;17:6,6;\n53:10　91: I;94: 16,22;95: 1,　107:10　6,9;87: 13,17;88:24,　18:19;23:5;27:3;\n理解\n(I)　14,20　Welcome（欢迎）\n(1)　25;89: 1,3;93: 14;　34: 15,18, 18,23;49:5,\n15:9　观点 (4)　2:23　95:7,15;96:7;97:8,　8;51:12,17,19,21,23;\n已理解\n(8)　67:10,13;74:18;　不是\n(4)　24;98:2　52: 1,2;56: 12, 12;\n10:14;15:18;19:13;\n25: 17,19,25;54: 10;　99:4　26:3;84: 14;93:24;　证人\n(2)　59: 1;86: 12,14;87:3;\n85:9　违反\n(1)　94:11　3:16;5:11　106:7,12,23\n不幸的是\n(1)　68:10\n违反\n(2)　West（韦斯特） (1)　证人的\n(1)　更年轻的\n(2)\n56: 11　86:24　50:12,19\n我\n75:21　70:12,19　什么是\n(4)　女人\n(1)　YouTube（优兔）\n(2)\nUniqueness（独特性）\n(1)\n60:24　Virgin（维珍）\n(1)　17:23;46:2;58:21 ;　35:10　I 11:21,22\n单位 (I)　106:8\n声音 (8)　77:22\nWhatsApp（WhatsApp）\n(1)　Wong（黄） (1)\n20:3　Yvette（伊薇特） (4)\n87:15　11:23;12:3;13:15,　49:23　词\n(2)　116:23;20:3;21:15,\nUnited（联合） (4)　16;17:3;49: 17;50:21;　每当\n(2)　18\n14:16;60:11,18;　56:10　108:24,25　8:12;47:15\n词语\n(1)　Yvetteyue423\n(I)\n84:17　自愿地\n(1)　此后\n(23)　I\n20:4\n大学\n(1)　14:8　3: 12;17:15;19:20,　51: I　Z\n48:8　志愿者\n(1)　22;23:13,15;28:11;　工作\n(10)\n17:19,20; 18:3, II,　I\n除非 (2)　73:15　40: 12;43: 14,22;　18;48:24;51: 13,14,　.1\n62:6;109:9　投票 (4)　55:23;56: 1,5;69:9, 15,　25;52:22　Zero（零） (1)\n前所未有的\n(1)　79:20,24;80:8,15　24;71 :23;77: 14,20;　工作过\n(1)　I 5:20\nZhang（张）\n(5)\n6:15　担保\n(1)　83: 19;88:25;97: 17;　18:15　I 105:6,8,8,9; 107: 10\n向上 (23)　84:10　99:25　正在工作\n(5)\n2:7,8;5:9;6:5;9:3;　整个 (11)　48:4,6,8;49:5;　1\n10:20,24; 14:16,16;　W　6: I; 13:12;17:20;　51: 12　I\n18:25;24: 16;47:25;　18:12;29: 10;43: 1;　工作\n(1)　I\n1 (3)\n51:2;65:3,22;73:5;　等待 (1)　48: 14;50:7;71: 13;　10:1　I 76:21,23,24\n77:3;84:24;85: 18;　103:24　89: 11;90:6　世界\n(2)　1.5 (1)\n89:8;93:2;94:7;95: 10　步行 (I)　谁的 (1)　6:2;48:25　I 49:10\n在……之上 (1)　90:15　36:2　Worldwide（全球）\n(1)　1:00 (1)\n15:8　Wan（文） (4)　愿意 (2)　49:4　I\n103:20\n使用 (3)　2:3; 17:24;59:4;　50: 18,22　价值\n(1)　10 (1)\n25:7;29:21 ;82:21　98:2　获胜 (1)　24:14　I 18:21\n使用过 (12)　W-A-N (1)　73:13　结束\n(1)　100 (5)\n8: 12;9:7;25: 19;　98:3　希望 (1)　73:5　书写\n(2)　45:4;48: 13\n50:25;53:2;61 :6,9;　Wang（王）\n(21)　107:25　写\n(2)　45:4;48: 13\n81:4;85:5,6,6;96:4　5: 13, 13,21; 16:23;　撤回\n(1)　19:7,10　10019 (1)\n有用的 (1)\n•　17:5,19; 19:16,25;　64:6　书面\n(2)　I 56:12\n4:6　23: 18;25: 12;26:23;　撤回\n(1)　71:12,15　101 (1)\n正在使用 (2)　27: 10;28:22;29: 16;　108:16　书面的\n(2)　I 26:22\n6:10;24:7　30:3;33: 1;40: 16;　在……之内\n(2)　72:2;104:12　102 (I)\n通常 (1)　41 :20;46:20;47:24;　53:24;63:22　错误的\n(I)　I 34:20\n35:20　72:25　没有\n(21)　74:2\nWang's（王的）\n(2)　9:2;11:17;28:13;　不当行为\n(1)　r-minute\n(I)\n92:15\nV　17:12;46:10　42: I;47: 10;48:21;　5:3\n想要\n(I)　85:24;86:4;95:9;　jl\n(I)\n38:13\n各种各样的\n(3)　105: 10　97:1;98:15,19;　X\n4:2; 12:23;89:7　浪费 (4)　103: 13;106: 17,24;　j2 (I)\n59:1\n面纱 (14)　4:7;31: 15;98:5;　107:6,11,14,16;　X-ed\n(I)\n4: 14,15,24;5:7,7,9;　99:10\n100:8,16,18,21;　浪费\n(4)　108:9,23　95:3　103:21\n102:20,25; 103: 12,15　44: 13,22;99: 12, 13　证人 (73)　13 (I)\n对\n(I)　方式 (8)　4:12,13,13,13;\n14:9; 16:23; 17:5,8,9,　y　34:\n\n2:2　15:24;22: 12;29: 13;　16;19:21;23: 14;25:3,　J5 (I)\n经由 (2)　31 :9;50:20;95:23;　3,4,5,5,11 ;26:8, 16,　Van（范） (1)\n17:5　32:19\n\n50(I)\nMin-U-Script@ (14) 无法获得－150\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）　文件 404-17　提交 05/20/22\n录入 05/20/22 11:52:18\n共 126 页　第 126 页\nNYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019\n2019 年\n4 月\n26 日\n\n17:6\n16 (3)　5\n49:14,24;50:11\n17 (2)　57th（第 57）\n9:24;19:24　17:6;56: 11\n19 (I)\n34:9　6\n\n2　60 (I)\n2 (I)　57:20\n41:2　62012 (I)\n2.3 (I)　3:17\n62013 (3)\n64:1　3:23,24;24: 17\n2:00 (I)　64 (I)\n99:23\n2009 (3)　92:1\n18:21;48:6;51: 13　65 (I)\n92:1\n2010 (I)　652077 (I)\n57:6\n2015 (10)　2:1\n41 :4,22;43:6;49:8;　66 (I)\n51:11,14;58:4;59:10,　92:1\n67 (2)\n11;75:18　21 :7;92: 1\n2016 (I)　6th（第 6）\n20:1\n2017 (7)　63:4,5\n2:2;41 :24;43:7;　7\n49: 14,22;71:2,3\n2018 (3)　7 (I)\n18:18;51:22;78:21\n21 (I)　34:20\n41:4　77 (I)\n34:8\n22D (I)　78 (2)\n17:6　29: 19;31 :25\n23rd（第 23） (2)\n49:8;51:14　781 (I)\n29 (I)　98:3\n78:21　8\n\n81 (2)\n3 (I)　38: 12;39:25\n8G (I)\n63:23　56:12\n3117a2 (I)\n9:6\n33 (3)　9\n69:8,12,21　9 (2)\n34 (2)　34:21;38:13\n23: 17;53:7\n340 (I)\n56:11\n35 (2)\n71:22;72:1\n40 (I)\n57:10\n43 (2)\n43: 19;46:24\n45 (I)\n91:8\n\n. \\_.\n\nMin-U-Script@ (15)16-9","key_entities":["Kwok","Je","Guo","Chinese Communist Party","Ho Wan Kwok","CIPA"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":331,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":36744,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-05-20 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-05-20","updated_at":"2026-08-23 23:35:51"}