{"id":"court_ctb_404_26","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":404,"sub_number":26,"doc_type":"EXHIBIT","filed_date":"2022-05-20","title":"EXHIBIT PAX 26 Transcript of Craig Jalbert Deposition","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"# **EXHIBIT PAX 26**\n\nTranscript of Craig Jalbert Deposition\n\n<span id=\"page-1-0\"></span>1 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT 3 BRIDGEPORT DIVISION ------------------------------------------X 4 IN RE: 5 Chapter 11 HO WAN KWOK, 6 Case No. 22-50073(JAM) 7 Debtor. 8 ------------------------------------------X 9 10 DATE: April 8, 2022 11 TIME: 10:17 A.M. 12 13 14 VIDEO-RECORDED DEPOSITION OF CRAIG 15 JALBERT of VERDOLINO & LOWEY, P.C., in the 16 above entitled matter, at the above date 17 and time, held at the offices of O'Melveny 18 & Myers LLP, 7 Times Square, New York, New 19 York 10036, by Lenaya Lynch, a Notary 20 Public and Shorthand Reporter of the State 21 of New York. 22 23 24 25 Page 1 85\n\n<span id=\"page-2-0\"></span>\n\n| 1                                                   | 1                                           |\n|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|\n| 2 A P P E A R A N C E S:                            | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 3 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP                             | 2<br>York. My name is Jonathan DiFilippo    |\n| Attorneys for PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA                 | 3                                           |\n| 4 OPPORTUNITY FUND LLP                              | from the firm Veritext and I am the         |\n| 7 Times Square, 30th Floor                          | 4<br>videographer. The Court Reporter is    |\n| 5 New York, New York 10036                          | 5                                           |\n| BY: LAURA ARONSSON, ESQ.                            | Lenaya Lynch from the firm, Veritext.       |\n| 6<br>DAVID HARBACH, ESQ.<br>MaKENZIE B. RUSSO, ESQ. | 6<br>I'm not authorized to administer an    |\n| 7                                                   | 7<br>oath. I'm not related to any party     |\n| 8                                                   | 8                                           |\n| BROWN RUDNICK LLP                                   | in this action nor am I financially         |\n| 9 Attorneys for HO WAN KWOK                         | 9<br>interested in the outcome.             |\n| 7 Times Square                                      | 10                                          |\n| 10 New York, New York 10036                         | Counsel and all present in the              |\n| BY: KENNETH J. AULET, ESQ.                          | 11                                          |\n| 11                                                  | room and everyone attending remotely        |\n| 12                                                  | 12<br>will now state their appearances and  |\n| PULLMAN & COMLEY LLC                                | 13                                          |\n| 13 Attorneys for CREDITOR'S COMMITTEE               | affiliations for the record. If             |\n| 850 Main Street                                     | 14<br>there are any objections to the       |\n| 14 PO Box 7006                                      | 15                                          |\n| Bridgeport, Connecticut 06601                       | proceeding, please state them at the        |\n| 15 BY: IRVE J. GOLDMAN, ESQ.                        | 16                                          |\n| 16                                                  | time of your appearance beginning           |\n| 17 COHN, BIRNBAUM, SHEA P.C.                        | 17<br>with the noticing attorney.           |\n| Attorney for GOLDEN SPRING                          | 18                                          |\n| 18 100 Pearl Street, Suite 12                       | MS. ARONSSON: Laura Aronsson,               |\n| New Haven, Connecticut 06103                        | 19<br>O'Melveny and Myers for Pacific       |\n| 19 BY: TIMOTHY MILTENBERGER, ESQ. via               | 20                                          |\n| Teleconference                                      | Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund LP.          |\n| 20                                                  | 21                                          |\n| 21                                                  | MR. HARBACH: David Harbach                  |\n| ALSO PRESENT:                                       | 22<br>with O'Melveny and Myers for the same |\n| 22                                                  | 23                                          |\n| JON DIFILIPPO, Legal Videographer                   | client.                                     |\n| 23                                                  | 24<br>MS. RUSSO: Makenzie Russo with        |\n| 24<br>*<br>*<br>*<br>25                             | 25<br>O'Melveny and Myers for the same      |\n| Page 2                                              | Page 4                                      |\n|                                                     |                                             |\n|                                                     |                                             |\n| 1                                                   | 1                                           |\n| C. JALBERT                                          | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2                                                   | 2                                           |\n| THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Good                              | client.                                     |\n| 3                                                   | 3                                           |\n| morning. We are going on the record                 | MR. AULET: Kenneth Aulet of                 |\n| 4                                                   | 4                                           |\n| at 10:17 a.m. on April 22nd -- I'm                  | Brown Rudnick, proposed counsel for         |\n| 5                                                   | 5                                           |\n| sorry, April 8th, 2022. Please note                 | the debtor, Ho Wan Kwok.                    |\n| 6                                                   | 6                                           |\n| that the microphones are sensitive                  | MR. GOLDMAN: Irve Goldman,                  |\n| 7                                                   | 7                                           |\n| and may pick up whispering, private                 | Pullman and Comley, proposed counsel        |\n| 8                                                   | 8                                           |\n| conversations and cellular                          | for the Creditor's Committee.               |\n| 9                                                   | 9                                           |\n| interference. Please turn off all                   | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the                  |\n| 10                                                  | 10                                          |\n| cell phones or place them away from                 | Court Reporter please swear in the          |\n| 11                                                  | 11                                          |\n| the microphone as they can interfere                | Witness?                                    |\n| 12                                                  | 12                                          |\n| with the deposition audio. Audio and                | MR. AULET: There's one person               |\n| 13                                                  | 13                                          |\n| video recording will continue to take               | on the line.                                |\n| 14                                                  | 14                                          |\n| place unless all parties agree to go                | MR. MILTENBERGER: Are we done               |\n| 15                                                  | 15                                          |\n| off the record.                                     | with the people in person? Timothy          |\n| 16                                                  | 16                                          |\n| This is Media Unit 1 of the                         | Miltenberger for Golden Spring, NY          |\n| 17                                                  | 17                                          |\n| video-recorded deposition of Craig                  | Limited.                                    |\n| 18                                                  | 18                                          |\n| Jalbert in the matter of re: Ho Wan                 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Will the                  |\n| 19                                                  | 19                                          |\n| Kwok filed in the United States                     | Court Reporter please swear in the          |\n|                                                     |                                             |\n| 20                                                  | 20                                          |\n| Bankruptcy Court, District of                       | Witness?                                    |\n| 21                                                  | 21                                          |\n| Connecticut, Bridgeport Division,                   | C R A I G J A L B E R T, called as a        |\n| 22                                                  | 22                                          |\n| Case Number 22-50073.                               | witness, having been first duly sworn by a  |\n| 23                                                  | 23                                          |\n| This deposition is being held                       | Notary Public of the State of New York, was |\n| 24                                                  | 24                                          |\n| at O'Melveny and Myers LLP, located                 | examined and testified as follows:          |\n| 25                                                  | 25                                          |\n| at Times Square Tower, New York, New                | EXAMINATION BY                              |\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n2 (Pages 2 - 5)\n\n85\n\n<span id=\"page-3-0\"></span>\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                          | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                      |\n|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2        | MS. ARONSSON:                                                       | 2        | A.<br>Yes.                                                                      |\n| 3        | Q.<br>Please state your name for the                                | 3        | Q.<br>Do you understand that means                                              |\n| 4        | record.                                                             | 4        | that you're swearing that all of your                                           |\n| 5        | A.<br>Craig Jalbert, J-A-L-B-E-R-T.                                 | 5        | answers are truthful?                                                           |\n| 6        | Q.<br>What is your address?                                         | 6        | A.<br>Yes.                                                                      |\n| 7        | A.<br>Home address? The business                                    | 7        | Q.<br>And that you are subject to the                                           |\n| 8        | address is 124 Washington Street, Suite                             | 8        | penalty of perjury?                                                             |\n| 9        | 101, Foxboro, Massachusetts 02035.                                  | 9        | A.<br>Yes.                                                                      |\n| 10       | Q.<br>Good morning. We previously                                   | 10       | Q.<br>The Videographer is recording                                             |\n| 11       | met off the record. On the record, my name                          | 11       | everything on camera and the Court Reporter                                     |\n| 12       | is Laura Aronsson and I'm an attorney at                            | 12       | is preparing a written record of what we                                        |\n| 13       | O'Melveny and Myers for Pacific Alliance                            | 13       | discuss here today and will later produce a                                     |\n| 14       | Asia Opportunity Fund. Mr. Jalbert, have                            | 14       | copy of that transcript. Do you                                                 |\n| 15       | you ever testified in court before?                                 | 15       | understand?                                                                     |\n| 16       | A.<br>Yes.                                                          | 16       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                      |\n| 17       | Q.<br>In what case -- or I'll start                                 | 17       | Q.<br>Unlike normal conversation, it                                            |\n| 18       | how many times?                                                     | 18       | is important that we not talk over one                                          |\n| 19       | A.<br>50, 60, 70 something.                                         | 19       | another. Please wait for me to finish my                                        |\n| 20       | MR. GOLDMAN: Before we get too                                      | 20       | question before you answer. I'll try to do                                      |\n| 21       | far into things, can I just ask --                                  | 21       | the same for you. Do you understand?                                            |\n| 22       | this is a notice of deposition                                      | 22       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                      |\n| 23       | relating to what contested matter?                                  | 23       | Q.<br>Your answers need to be                                                   |\n| 24       | There are a number of motions before                                | 24       | audible. A shake of the head is                                                 |\n| 25       | the Court. The notice of deposition                                 | 25       | insufficient as are statements like uh-huh.                                     |\n|          | Page 6                                                              |          | Page 8                                                                          |\n|          |                                                                     |          |                                                                                 |\n|          |                                                                     |          |                                                                                 |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                          | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                      |\n| 2        | doesn't indicate which of the matters                               | 2        | Do you understand?                                                              |\n| 3        | it relates to.                                                      | 3        | A.<br>Understood.                                                               |\n| 4        | MS. ARONSSON: Sure. So we                                           | 4        | Q.<br>If you do not understand my                                               |\n| 5        | have -- we served a 30(b)6 notice of                                | 5        | question, please ask me to repeat.                                              |\n| 6        | deposition which I'll mark as an                                    | 6        | Otherwise, I'll assume that you do                                              |\n| 7        | exhibit so that we're all on the same                               | 7        | understand the question. Is that okay?                                          |\n| 8        | page but it relates to the retention                                | 8        | A.<br>Yes.                                                                      |\n| 9        | of Verdolino and Lowey.                                             | 9        | Q.<br>If you need a break, just let                                             |\n| 10       | MR. GOLDMAN: All right. I                                           | 10       | me know and we can take one but if there's                                      |\n| 11       | just wasn't sure because it's not                                   | 11       | a question pending, please answer it before                                     |\n| 12       | identified on the notice.                                           | 12       | we break. Are you represented by Counsel                                        |\n| 13       | MS. ARONSSON: Thank you.                                            | 13       | today?                                                                          |\n| 14       | Q.<br>Sorry. You said 50 or 60                                      | 14       | A.<br>I think so.                                                               |\n| 15       | times?                                                              | 15       | Q.<br>Who do you understand to be                                               |\n| 16       | A.<br>70, 80, I don't know. I have                                  | 16       | representing you?                                                               |\n| 17       | not kept -- I've got a list of ten years                            | 17       | A.<br>Ken Aulet.                                                                |\n| 18       | that goes back 40 or 50 and I've been doing                         | 18       | Q.<br>If your attorney objects to a                                             |\n| 19       | it for 30. So no idea.                                              | 19       | question, you should still answer it unless                                     |\n| 20       | Q.<br>Well, we can talk about some of                               | 20       | you don't understand the question or                                            |\n| 21       | the broad categories of experience you have                         | 21       | Counsel instructs you not to answer. Do                                         |\n| 22       | later but let's start just to go over a few                         | 22       | you understand?                                                                 |\n| 23       | procedures that I'm sure you're familiar                            | 23       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                      |\n| 24<br>25 | with. Do you understand that you're<br>testifying under oath today? | 24<br>25 | Q.<br>Are you suffering from any<br>condition that would impair your ability to |\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n3 (Pages 6 - 9)\n\n<span id=\"page-4-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n|----|---------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | testify accurately or truthfully?           | 2  | been designated to testify about each topic |\n| 3  | A.<br>No.                                   | 3  | listed here?                                |\n| 4  | Q.<br>Are you taking any medications        | 4  | MR. AULET: Objection.                       |\n| 5  | that might interfere with your ability to   | 5  | A.<br>Yes.                                  |\n| 6  | give accurate or truthful testimony?        | 6  | MR. AULET: He's been                        |\n| 7  | A.<br>No.                                   | 7  | designated as per our responses and         |\n| 8  | Q.<br>Is there any reason why you           | 8  | objections.                                 |\n| 9  | cannot testify truthfully and accurately    | 9  | MS. ARONSSON: Thank you.                    |\n| 10 | today?                                      | 10 | Q.<br>Are you familiar with these           |\n| 11 | A.<br>No.                                   | 11 | subject areas?                              |\n| 12 | MS. ARONSSON: Tab one. The                  | 12 | A.<br>Yes.                                  |\n| 13 | Court Reporter is going to be marking       | 13 | Q.<br>Do you understand that you are        |\n| 14 | what will be Jalbert Exhibit 1.             | 14 | required to testify as to Verdolino and     |\n| 15 | (Whereupon, Notice of                       | 15 | Lowey's knowledge about these topics, not   |\n| 16 | Deposition was marked as Jalbert            | 16 | just your own?                              |\n| 17 | Exhibit 1 for identification as of          | 17 | A.<br>Yes.                                  |\n| 18 | this date by the Reporter.)                 | 18 | Q.<br>Do you understand that you were       |\n| 19 | Q.<br>All right, Mr. Jalbert. Do you        | 19 | required to obtain all of the knowledge and |\n| 20 | recognize this document?                    | 20 | information necessary to allow you to fully |\n| 21 | A.<br>I do.                                 | 21 | and honestly testify concerning each of     |\n| 22 | Q.<br>What is it?                           | 22 | these topics upon Verdolino and Lowey's     |\n| 23 | A.<br>Pacific Alliance Asia                 | 23 | behalf?                                     |\n| 24 | Opportunity Fund LLP's Notice of Deposition | 24 | MR. AULET: Same objection as                |\n| 25 | of Verdolino and Lowey PC pursuant to Rule  | 25 | before.                                     |\n|    | Page 10                                     |    | Page 12                                     |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2  | 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil      | 2  | A.<br>I did the best I could.               |\n| 3  | Procedure.                                  | 3  | Q.<br>What, if anything, did you do         |\n| 4  | Q.<br>Is it your understanding that         | 4  | to prepare for this deposition?             |\n| 5  | you are testifying today in connection with | 5  | A.<br>I spoke with attorney Ben             |\n| 6  | in re: Ho Wan Kwok?                         | 6  | Silverberg, with Counsel, Ken Aulet, I      |\n| 7  | A.<br>Yes.                                  | 7  | spoke with my colleagues, Matthew Flynn and |\n| 8  | Q.<br>Can you please turn to Page 6         | 8  | Mary Jo Schindler. I reviewed a             |\n| 9  | --                                          | 9  | significant amount of documents, some filed |\n| 10 | A.<br>Excuse me, I just forgot to get       | 10 | with the Court, some prepared internally.   |\n| 11 | my glasses.                                 | 11 | Reviewed e-mails. Covered as much as I      |\n| 12 | MS. ARONSSON: Can we go off                 | 12 | could.                                      |\n| 13 | the record for one minute?                  | 13 | Q.<br>Did you collect the documents         |\n| 14 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is               | 14 | that you prepared or were they provided to  |\n| 15 | 10:24 a.m. and we are off the record.       | 15 | you by Counsel?                             |\n| 16 | (Whereupon, an off-the-record               | 16 | A.<br>The documents that -- are you         |\n| 17 | discussion was held.)                       | 17 | asking for the documents that we sent to    |\n| 18 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is               | 18 | O'Melveny?                                  |\n| 19 | 10:24 a.m. and we're back on the            | 19 | Q.<br>I'm asking -- taking a step           |\n| 20 | record. You may proceed.                    | 20 | back, just asking about your preparation    |\n| 21 | Q.<br>Can you turn to Page 6 to the         | 21 | for today's deposition.                     |\n| 22 | heading Rule 30(b)(6) deposition topics?    | 22 | A.<br>I just looked at my own               |\n| 23 | You see that?                               | 23 | documents and my own e-mails on the         |\n| 24 | A.<br>Yes.                                  | 24 | Verdolino and Lowey server.                 |\n| 25 | Q.<br>Do you understand that you have       | 25 | Q.<br>Generally, what were the              |\n|    | Page 11                                     |    | Page 13                                     |\n\n4 (Pages 10 - 13)\n\n<span id=\"page-5-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                      |\n|----|---------------------------------------------|----|-------------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | subject matters of those e-mails?           | 2  | Q.<br>Anyone else besides the people            |\n| 3  | A.<br>It was looking at the -- all of       | 3  | that we've talked about?                        |\n| 4  | -- not all of them. Many of my e-mails,     | 4  | A.<br>Regarding the -- just regarding           |\n| 5  | the SOFA's -- the statement of financial    | 5  | the deposition?                                 |\n| 6  | affairs -- the schedules, the global notes, | 6  | Q.<br>Yes.                                      |\n| 7  | the global notes and specific notes, most   | 7  | A.<br>No.                                       |\n| 8  | of the pleadings to employ professionals,   | 8  | Q.<br>You haven't spoke to the                  |\n| 9  | particularly ours, the motion for the DIP   | 9  | debtor?                                         |\n| 10 | financing, many of the objections, not all  | 10 | A.<br>About the deposition?                     |\n| 11 | of them. I'm trying to think if there's     | 11 | Q.<br>About the deposition.                     |\n| 12 | anything else. I can't think of anything    | 12 | A.<br>No.                                       |\n| 13 | off the top beyond that --                  | 13 | Q.<br>Have you ever met the debtor?             |\n| 14 | Q.<br>Thank you. That's helpful. So         | 14 | A.<br>Yes.                                      |\n| 15 | you mentioned that you spoke to your        | 15 | Q.<br>When did you meet the debtor?             |\n| 16 | attorneys, Ben and Ken?                     | 16 | A.<br>The continued meeting of 342 --           |\n| 17 | A.<br>Yes.                                  | 17 | or 341 meeting which was I think Wednesday,     |\n| 18 | Q.<br>When did you speak to them?           | 18 | the first time I met him.                       |\n| 19 | A.<br>Well, we were delayed a little        | 19 | Q.<br>Is that the only time you met             |\n| 20 | bit so I had a few minutes this morning     | 20 | the debtor?                                     |\n| 21 | with Ken. I spoke with Ben briefly last     | 21 | A.<br>Yes.                                      |\n| 22 | night. Again, this morning on -- unrelated  | 22 | Q.<br>Outside of the 341 proceeding,            |\n| 23 | to the deposition and I had previously      | 23 | did you interact with the debtor?               |\n| 24 | spoken to Ken probably one or two times     | 24 | A.<br>No.                                       |\n| 25 | over the last few days, give or take.       | 25 | Q.<br>I just want to cover a little             |\n|    |                                             |    |                                                 |\n|    | Page 14                                     |    | Page 16                                         |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                      |\n| 2  | Q.<br>Were each of these interactions       | 2  | bit of your background. Can you talk about      |\n| 3  | over the phone?                             | 3  | your educational history since high school?     |\n| 4  | A.<br>Until today, yes.                     | 4  | A.<br>I graduated from Western                  |\n| 5  | Q.<br>About how long did you spend          | 5  | Connecticut High School in 1979. I went to      |\n| 6  | preparing with your attorneys in connection | 6  | Boston College. Graduated Boston College        |\n| 7  | with your preparation for this deposition?  | 7  | with a bachelor of science and degree in        |\n| 8  | A.<br>I would have to hazard a guess.       | 8  | accountancy in 1983. I went to work for         |\n| 9  | I don't have my time records in front of    | 9  | Arthur Andersen from June of '83 till           |\n| 10 | me.                                         | 10 | August 31 of '87. On September 1 of 1987,       |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Like two hours, ten hours?            | 11 | I started at the precursor of what is now       |\n| 12 | A.<br>My guess is in the two to four        | 12 | Verdolino and Lowey and I've been there in      |\n| 13 | hour range. No more than that.              | 13 | the 35 years since and during that time, I      |\n| 14 | Q.<br>Did you speak to anyone else          | 14 | I've gone to many, many, many professional      |\n| 15 | other than the folks that you mentioned at  | 15 | CPE type courses of all sorts of flavors.       |\n| 16 | Verdolino and Lowey and your attorneys      | 16 | Q.<br>What do you mean by CPE?                  |\n| 17 | regarding this deposition?                  | 17 | A.<br>A continuing professional                 |\n| 18 | A.<br>Our IT person, Tim McDonald who       | 18 | education.                                      |\n| 19 | assisted in the search -- the electronic    | 19 | Q.<br>Is that a required procedure              |\n| 20 | search of e-mails and records and worked    | 20 | for any type of certification that you          |\n| 21 | with the Brown Rudnick IT person to send    | 21 | have?                                           |\n| 22 | everything over. Aside from having him try  | 22 | A.<br>It's -- some of it is required            |\n| 23 | and get the records, we didn't have any     | 23 | for my certification as a certified             |\n| 24 | discussion of the case facts and            | 24 | insolvency restructuring advisor. The rest      |\n| 25 | circumstances or anything.<br>Page 15       | 25 | are just to maintain my professional<br>Page 17 |\n\n5 (Pages 14 - 17)\n\n<span id=\"page-6-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                           | 1  | C. JALBERT                                             |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | capabilities and stay on top of various              | 2  | responsible for this?                                  |\n| 3  | issues as the years have gone on.                    | 3  | A.<br>Well, my partner and various                     |\n| 4  | Q.<br>So you mentioned certified                     | 4  | staff.                                                 |\n| 5  | insolvency instructor?                               | 5  | Q.<br>What's his name?                                 |\n| 6  | A.<br>Certified insolvency                           | 6  | A.<br>Keith Lowey.                                     |\n| 7  | restructuring advisor. CIRA.                         | 7  | Q.<br>Is that department involved in                   |\n| 8  | Q.<br>So this is a professional                      | 8  | this matter before us?                                 |\n| 9  | certification?                                       | 9  | A.<br>No.                                              |\n| 10 | A.<br>Yes.                                           | 10 | Q.<br>Is Verdolino and Lowey always                    |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Do you hold any other                          | 11 | engaged by the debtor in the bankruptcy                |\n| 12 | professional certifications besides the              | 12 | context?                                               |\n| 13 | CIA?                                                 | 13 | A.<br>No.                                              |\n| 14 | A.<br>CIRA, no.                                      | 14 | Q.<br>What other scenarios is                          |\n| 15 | Q.<br>CIRA. I think you said you had                 | 15 | Verdolino and Lowey engaged under?                     |\n| 16 | a accountant degree from Boston College?             | 16 | A.<br>We've been engaged by trustees,                  |\n| 17 | A.<br>Yes.                                           | 17 | post confirmation fiduciaries, whatever                |\n| 18 | Q.<br>Do you hold any other graduate                 | 18 | they may be called; you said debtors,                  |\n| 19 | or any graduate degrees?                             | 19 | creditors' committee, creditors, secured               |\n| 20 | A.<br>No.                                            | 20 | lenders. I think we've probably                        |\n| 21 | Q.<br>Are you currently employed at                  | 21 | represented, over the years, most every                |\n| 22 | Verdolino and Lowey?                                 | 22 | kind of party and interest to a bankruptcy             |\n| 23 | A.<br>Yes.                                           | 23 | that there is.                                         |\n| 24 | Q.<br>Generally, what services does                  | 24 | Q.<br>Turning to your experience                       |\n| 25 | Verdolino and Lowey offer its clients?               | 25 | specifically, what experience do you have              |\n|    |                                                      |    |                                                        |\n|    | Page 18                                              |    | Page 20                                                |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                           | 1  | C. JALBERT                                             |\n| 2  | A.<br>There were three or four -- I                  | 2  | in Chapter 11 cases?                                   |\n| 3  | guess four major buckets. The first and              | 3  | A.<br>I've been in over 500 Chapter                    |\n| 4  | biggest is the insolvency arena,                     | 4  | 11 cases. We've been committee financial               |\n| 5  | underperforming businesses and individuals.          | 5  | advisor, committee accountants, debtor                 |\n| 6  | That includes litigation support and                 | 6  | financial advisor, debtor accountants,                 |\n| 7  | everything related to it. We have a                  | 7  | accountants on behalf of secured lenders,              |\n| 8  | full-time 13 or 14 people I think it is              | 8  | accountants on behalf of individual                    |\n| 9  | that work in taxation and we also do what            | 9  | creditors. Trying to think -- I mean                   |\n| 10 | I'll call high net worth babysitting. We             | 10 | again, we've done -- we've represented                 |\n| 11 | have -- and I don't do any of this work.             | 11 | pretty much every constituency so over                 |\n| 12 | My partner and others do it but we have              | 12 | time, I've done -- I've represented every              |\n| 13 | very wealthy clients that don't pay their            | 13 | reasonable constituency in a bankruptcy I              |\n| 14 | own bills, that have multiple residences.            | 14 | can remember.                                          |\n| 15 | Everything comes to us. We act as a family           | 15 | Q.<br>What is your title at Verdolino                  |\n| 16 | office for a whole -- for a number of                | 16 | and Lowey?                                             |\n| 17 | people and the last thing we do is federal           | 17 | A.<br>Principal.                                       |\n| 18 | election reporting for federal congress              | 18 | Q.<br>We talked about the four                         |\n| 19 | people and senators and presidential.                | 19 | buckets. Generally, what are your                      |\n| 20 | Q.<br>Thank you.                                     | 20 | responsibilities with respect to Verdolino             |\n| 21 | A.<br>Did I say we have tax                          | 21 | and Lowey services?                                    |\n| 22 | department -- yes, tax department. That's            | 22 | A.<br>Just for the most part, the                      |\n| 23 | the four.                                            | 23 | first -- all of my time not spent running              |\n| 24 | Q.<br>You mentioned the high net                     | 24 | my own firm is in the bankruptcy insolvency            |\n| 25 | worth baby sitting. Who, at Verdolino, is<br>Page 19 | 25 | and the like that spreads over a little bit<br>Page 21 |\n\n85\n\n6 (Pages 18 - 21)\n\n<span id=\"page-7-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                           |          |                                                                     |         |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                   | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                          |         |\n| 2        | to taxation. I don't run the department or                                   | 2        | generally regarding the engagement?                                 |         |\n| 3        | anything but I certainly interact and then                                   | 3        | A.<br>There was a little bit with                                   |         |\n| 4        | litigation support and the like, you know,                                   | 4        | Steven Pohl and with -- I believe it was                            |         |\n| 5        | the types of things you would do in the                                      | 5        | Ben Silverberg.                                                     |         |\n| 6        | context of a bankruptcy.                                                     | 6        | Q.<br>Anyone else at Brown Rudnick?                                 |         |\n| 7        | Q.<br>What is meant by litigation                                            | 7        | A.<br>I don't remember.                                             |         |\n| 8        | support, generally?                                                          | 8        | Q.<br>Besides Brown Rudnick, did you                                |         |\n| 9        | A.<br>Well, it can be pretty broad                                           | 9        | speak to anyone else regarding the                                  |         |\n| 10       | but for us, it's -- whether it be business                                   | 10       | potential engagement?                                               |         |\n| 11       | litigation or bankruptcy litigation, to the                                  | 11       | A.<br>I probably mentioned something                                |         |\n| 12       | extent that there are areas that whoever                                     | 12       | to my -- my own staff to clear conflicts                            |         |\n| 13       | the law firm -- we've also been appointed                                    | 13       | and I think I had someone help me prepare                           |         |\n| 14       | by judges, anyone that's looking or                                          | 14       | some -- I shouldn't say prepare, they're                            |         |\n| 15       | interested in obtaining financial                                            | 15       | already prepared. Send some individual                              |         |\n| 16       | information in a form that they're looking                                   | 16       | information about myself and the firm.                              |         |\n| 17       | for, which could be anything, we would                                       | 17       | Q.<br>Did Verdolino and Lowey speak                                 |         |\n| 18       | provide it. That would include doing                                         | 18       | to anyone else besides Brown Rudnick in                             |         |\n| 19       | expert reports, expert testimony and work                                    | 19       | connection with the engagement?                                     |         |\n| 20       | at just advising lawyers as they approach                                    | 20       | MR. AULET: Objection. You can                                       |         |\n| 21       | areas in accounting and auditing and the                                     | 21       | answer.                                                             |         |\n| 22       | like.                                                                        | 22       | A.<br>At the time we're being                                       |         |\n| 23       | Q.<br>You mentioned here that you're                                         | 23       | engaged?                                                            |         |\n| 24       | a principal at Verdolino and Lowey?                                          | 24       | Q.<br>Yes.                                                          |         |\n| 25       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                   | 25       | A.<br>No.                                                           |         |\n|          | Page 22                                                                      |          |                                                                     | Page 24 |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                   | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                          |         |\n| 2        | Q.<br>What other roles have you held?                                        | 2        | Q.<br>Who are the main points of                                    |         |\n| 3        | A.<br>I've been a principal since I                                          | 3        | contact between -- who are the main                                 |         |\n| 4        | started.                                                                     | 4        | contacts for -- strike that. Who do you                             |         |\n| 5        | Q.<br>Turning to the engagement here,                                        | 5        | generally speak to regarding this                                   |         |\n| 6        |                                                                              |          |                                                                     |         |\n|          | who contacted Verdolino and Lowey about                                      | 6        | engagement besides internal folks at                                |         |\n| 7        | this engagement?                                                             | 7        | Verdolino and Lowey?                                                |         |\n| 8        | A.<br>Well, it was contacted me                                              | 8        | A.<br>Mostly the attorneys at Brown                                 |         |\n| 9        | personally and it was an attorney, Steven                                    | 9        | Rudnick.                                                            |         |\n| 10       | Pohl at Brown Rudnick.                                                       | 10       | Q.<br>Do you speak to anyone else?                                  |         |\n| 11       | Q.<br>Sorry, I missed what you said.                                         | 11       | A.<br>I've been on phone calls with                                 |         |\n| 12       | MR. HARBACH: Spell that name.                                                | 12       | other lawyers but I've not initiated                                |         |\n| 13       | Q.<br>Can you spell that name,                                               | 13       | anything.                                                           |         |\n| 14       | please?                                                                      | 14       | Q.<br>Which other lawyers have you                                  |         |\n| 15       | A.<br>The name was Steven Pohl. Last                                         | 15       | been on phone calls with?                                           |         |\n| 16       | name P-O-H-L at Brown Rudnick.                                               | 16       | A.<br>The other debtor lawyers that                                 |         |\n| 17       | Q.<br>Mr. Pohl reached out to who at                                         | 17       | I'm aware of are an Aaron Mitchell and a                            |         |\n| 18       | Verdolino and Lowey?                                                         | 18       | Melissa Francis.                                                    |         |\n| 19       | A.<br>Me.                                                                    | 19       | Q.<br>Who do you understand Aaron                                   |         |\n| 20       | Q.<br>You. Do you recall when that                                           | 20       | Mitchell to be?                                                     |         |\n| 21       | was?                                                                         | 21       | A.<br>Counsel to Mr. Kwok, the                                      |         |\n| 22       | A.<br>Somewhere around March 1, 2 or                                         | 22       | debtor.                                                             |         |\n| 23       | 3.                                                                           | 23       | Q.<br>You mentioned Melissa Francis?                                |         |\n| 24<br>25 | Q.<br>After Steven Pohl reached out,<br>who did Verdolino and Lowey speak to | 24<br>25 | A.<br>Also counsel to Mr. Kwok.<br>Q.<br>Besides Aaron Mitchell and |         |\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n7 (Pages 22 - 25)\n\n<span id=\"page-8-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                          |          |                                             |\n|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                  | 1        | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2        | Melissa Francis, do you speak to anyone                                     | 2        | Q.<br>So I'll just go on record to          |\n| 3        | else outside of Verdolino and Lowey                                         | 3        | say that we dispute that contention.        |\n| 4        | regarding this engagement?                                                  | 4        | MR. GOLDMAN: As do we. Who                  |\n| 5        | A.<br>And outside of Brown Rudnick?                                         | 5        | are you -- who do you fear harassment       |\n| 6        | Q.<br>Outside of Brown Rudnick, yes.                                        | 6        | from? Do you fear harassment from?          |\n| 7        | A.<br>No one.                                                               | 7        | MR. AULET: So Mr. -- Golden                 |\n| 8        | Q.<br>What about -- what about do you                                       | 8        | Spring's attorney is on the phone and       |\n| 9        | communicate via e-mail with anyone besides                                  | 9        | that question is probably best              |\n| 10       | Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Brown                                   | 10       | directed to Golden Springs but my           |\n| 11       | Rudnick regarding this engagement?                                          | 11       | understanding is that -- please, he         |\n| 12       | A.<br>I've been on -- I've been CC'd                                        | 12       | would like to answer.                       |\n| 13       | on an e-mail and authored one e-mail to                                     | 13       | MR. MILTENBERGER: Tim                       |\n| 14       | someone outside that group.                                                 | 14       | Miltenberger from Golden Springs.           |\n| 15       | Q.<br>Who is that person?                                                   | 15       | I'm assuming what the Witness is            |\n| 16       | MR. AULET: Objection. This is                                               | 16       | testifying to is the identity of a          |\n| 17       | the person that we have stated their                                        | 17       | Golden Spring employee which isn't          |\n| 18       | identity won't be revealed per Golden                                       | 18       | clear to me from the record but             |\n| 19       | Springs request.                                                            | 19       | apparently the people at the                |\n| 20       | MS. ARONSSON: Are you                                                       | 20       | deposition reached that conclusion.         |\n| 21       | instructing the Witness not to                                              | 21       | We don't see any relevance in               |\n| 22       | answer?                                                                     | 22       | revealing the name of the employees         |\n| 23       | MR. AULET: I am instructing                                                 | 23       | of Golden Spring based on the               |\n| 24       | him not to answer.                                                          | 24       | objection that's filed to the DIP           |\n| 25       | MS. ARONSSON: Can you just                                                  | 25       | financing motion and we think that          |\n|          | Page 26                                                                     |          | Page 28                                     |\n|          |                                                                             |          |                                             |\n|          |                                                                             |          |                                             |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                  | 1        | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2        | state --                                                                    | 2        | the privacy rights of our employees         |\n| 3        | MR. GOLDMAN: Can you repeat                                                 | 3        | are paramount to any information that       |\n| 4        | the question?                                                               | 4        | might be gathered from knowing the          |\n| 5        | (Whereupon, the referred-to                                                 | 5        | name of -- rank and file employees of       |\n| 6        | question was read back by the                                               | 6        | Golden Spring and we oppose                 |\n| 7        | Reporter.)                                                                  | 7        | disclosing that information.                |\n| 8        | THE WITNESS: That should have                                               | 8        | MR. GOLDMAN: That's up to the               |\n| 9        | been e-mails. I authored one but I                                          | 9        | Judge. It's a totally inappropriate         |\n| 10       | was CC'd on e-mails.                                                        | 10       | instruction to direct the Witness not       |\n| 11       | Q.<br>I understand Mr. Aulet is                                             | 11       | to answer. The Witness can answer           |\n| 12       | instructing you not to answer.                                              | 12       | and you can get a ruling from the           |\n| 13       | MS. ARONSSON: Mr. Aulet, do                                                 | 13       | Judge as to whether the answer should       |\n| 14       | you mind just providing a more                                              | 14       | be stricken or protected or subject         |\n| 15       | detailed objection?                                                         | 15       | to a protective order. It's totally         |\n| 16       | MR. AULET: Sure. Based on my                                                | 16       | inappropriate to direct the Witness         |\n| 17<br>18 | conversations with Golden Spring, my<br>understanding is that Golden Spring | 17<br>18 | not to answer.<br>MS. ARONSSON: I noted our |\n| 19       | believes that revealing that                                                | 19       | dispute with Mr. Aulet and I'll just        |\n| 20       | individual's name would potentially                                         | 20       | note our dispute with Mr.                   |\n| 21       | expose them to harassment and based                                         | 21       | Miltenberger's reasoning behind the         |\n| 22       | on my review of the documents at                                            | 22       | objection here.                             |\n| 23       | issue, the person's identity is not                                         | 23       | MR. MILTENBERGER: Thank you.                |\n| 24       | relevant to the issues at hand in                                           | 24       | Q.<br>Turning back to the folks we          |\n| 25       | this deposition.                                                            | 25       | were just talking about, you mentioned      |\n\n8 (Pages 26 - 29)\n\n<span id=\"page-9-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                                       |          |                                             |         |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------|---------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                  |         |\n| 2        | Melissa Francis. Did she represent to you                                                | 2        | sure I wasn't missing anything.             |         |\n| 3        | that she was Mr. Kwok's counsel?                                                         | 3        | Q.<br>Besides the attorneys at Brown        |         |\n| 4        | A.<br>No.                                                                                | 4        | Rudnick, did you circulate drafts of that   |         |\n| 5        | Q.<br>How did you learn about what                                                       | 5        | engagement letter to anyone else?           |         |\n| 6        | Ms. Melissa Francis -- who Mr. -- strike                                                 | 6        | A.<br>I don't recall anyone else            |         |\n| 7        | that. How did you learn who Ms. Francis'                                                 | 7        | being on it but I'm pretty sure they then   |         |\n| 8        | client was?                                                                              | 8        | did circulate it with -- at a minimum, Ms.  |         |\n| 9        | A.<br>From Brown Rudnick.                                                                | 9        | Melissa Francis and probably Aaron Mitchell |         |\n| 10       | Q.<br>We've talked about the folks at                                                    | 10       | as well.                                    |         |\n| 11       | Verdolino that you communicate with this                                                 | 11       | MS. ARONSSON: Tab 11. The                   |         |\n| 12       | engagement. Do you know of anyone else                                                   | 12       | Court Reporter is going to hand you         |         |\n| 13       | that Verdolino and Lowey communicates with                                               | 13       | what is being marked as Jalbert             |         |\n| 14       | regarding this engagement besides the folks                                              | 14       | Exhibit 2. This document -- for the         |         |\n| 15       | that we've talked about?                                                                 | 15       | record, this document bears the Bates       |         |\n| 16       | A.<br>I don't think there were others                                                    | 16       | Number Kwok 00001646.                       |         |\n| 17       | but it is possible that one of my                                                        | 17       | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                |         |\n| 18       | colleagues met Flynn. Might have had                                                     | 18       | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 2 for             |         |\n| 19       | e-mail contact. You're aware -- because I                                                | 19       | identification as of this date by the       |         |\n| 20       | think you objected to -- there's a large                                                 | 20       | Reporter.)                                  |         |\n| 21       | number of ordinary course professionals.                                                 | 21       | Q.<br>Before we get to the exhibit,         |         |\n| 22       | We needed to get information about                                                       | 22       | what is a post-petition retainer?           |         |\n| 23       | liabilities to them for the schedules.                                                   | 23       | A.<br>My understanding would be a           |         |\n| 24       | There might have been some information and                                               | 24       | retainer paid to whoever, after the filing  |         |\n| 25       | stuff because we needed -- it's possible                                                 | 25       | of a bankruptcy, intended to be a retainer. |         |\n|          | Page 30                                                                                  |          |                                             | Page 32 |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                  |         |\n| 2        | that he spoke with them but I think really                                               | 2        | Q.<br>Can you please turn to Page 2         |         |\n| 3        | what he did is he got all the information                                                | 3        | of this document? Take a minute. At the     |         |\n| 4        | from Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis. I                                               | 4        | top of Page 2, Mr. Silverberg says that     |         |\n| 5        | don't think he went outside of that but                                                  | 5        | there's no post-petition retainer expected. |         |\n| 6        | it's possible.                                                                           | 6        | Do you see that?                            |         |\n| 7        | Q.<br>Do you know where Aaron                                                            | 7        | A.<br>Yes.                                  |         |\n| 8        | Mitchell and Melissa Francis retrieved                                                   | 8        | Q.<br>Do you recall whether you had a       |         |\n| 9        | their information from?                                                                  | 9        | preference about receiving a post-petition  |         |\n| 10       | A.<br>No.                                                                                | 10       | retainer?                                   |         |\n| 11       | Q.<br>Did you ask them where they                                                        | 11       | A.<br>Well, every professional would        |         |\n| 12       | retrieved their information from?                                                        | 12       | rather have a retainer but frankly, under   |         |\n| 13       | A.<br>No.                                                                                | 13       | the circumstances, it wasn't expected.      |         |\n| 14       | Q.<br>Who negotiated -- who, from                                                        | 14       | Q.<br>Starting with your preference,        |         |\n| 15       | Verdolino and Lowey, negotiated the                                                      | 15       | why would you prefer to have a              |         |\n| 16       | engagement letter?                                                                       | 16       | post-petition retainer?                     |         |\n| 17       | A.<br>It would be me. I don't know                                                       | 17       | A.<br>Security against the payment of       |         |\n| 18       | that I would call it a negotiation but it                                                | 18       | the fees.                                   |         |\n| 19       | was me that drafted it and prepared it and                                               | 19       | Q.<br>Do you know whether you               |         |\n| 20       | sent it to Brown Rudnick.                                                                | 20       | received a post-petition retainer in        |         |\n| 21       | Q.<br>Anyone else involved in                                                            | 21       | connection with this case?                  |         |\n| 22       | drafting that engagement letter?                                                         | 22       | A.<br>I do.                                 |         |\n| 23       | A.<br>Well, from a QPC perspective,                                                      | 23       | Q.<br>Did you?                              |         |\n| 24<br>25 | I'm sure I had one of my colleagues, Mary<br>Jo Schindler take a look at it just to make | 24<br>25 | A.<br>No.<br>Q.<br>And why not?             |         |\n|          | Page 31                                                                                  |          |                                             | Page 33 |\n|          |                                                                                          |          |                                             |         |\n\n9 (Pages 30 - 33)\n\n85\n\n<span id=\"page-10-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                      | 1  | C. JALBERT                                             |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | A.<br>I didn't ask for one.                     | 2  | A.<br>Yep.                                             |\n| 3  | Q.<br>Turning back to the e-mail, Mr.           | 3  | Q.<br>Did you ask for a post-petition                  |\n| 4  | Silverberg writes, \"big Q is whether it's       | 4  | retainer in connection with this                       |\n| 5  | us retaining you or the client. I would         | 5  | engagement?                                            |\n| 6  | think you're retained by the client as his      | 6  | A.<br>No.                                              |\n| 7  | financial advisor\". Do you recall that          | 7  | Q.<br>Do you know if Verdolino and                     |\n| 8  | being a question in connection with this        | 8  | Lowey asked for a post-petition retainer in            |\n| 9  | engagement?                                     | 9  | connection with this engagement?                       |\n| 10 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                   | 10 | A.<br>I do.                                            |\n| 11 | A.<br>I don't think I understand your           | 11 | Q.<br>What's the answer?                               |\n| 12 | question. I can read the statement and          | 12 | A.<br>No.                                              |\n| 13 | understand but I don't know what you're         | 13 | Q.<br>You also write, \"but I think if                  |\n| 14 | asking.                                         | 14 | we are going to hold the cash, we will need            |\n| 15 | Q.<br>He says, \"big Q\", do you                  | 15 | to be employed by the debtor\". So does                 |\n| 16 | understand that to be a big question?           | 16 | that refresh your recollection about                   |\n| 17 | A.<br>I understand it might be a                | 17 | whether it was a question about who was                |\n| 18 | question in his mind. I don't know that he      | 18 | retaining Verdolino and Lowey?                         |\n| 19 | intended it to be a question for me or for      | 19 | A.<br>I don't think I had a question                   |\n|    |                                                 |    |                                                        |\n| 20 | himself and then he answered it.                | 20 | in my mind. I just responded with a                    |\n| 21 | MS. ARONSSON: Makenzie, can                     | 21 | comment that supported his previous comment            |\n| 22 | you hand me Tab 12?                             | 22 | where he said I would think you're retained            |\n| 23 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Mr. Jalbert,                  | 23 | by the client as his financial advisor.                |\n| 24 | would you mind moving the water                 | 24 | Q.<br>Generally, can you explain your                  |\n| 25 | bottle? It's coming up in the frame.<br>Page 34 | 25 | view in connection with the question<br>Page 36        |\n|    |                                                 |    |                                                        |\n|    |                                                 |    |                                                        |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                      | 1  | C. JALBERT                                             |\n| 2  | I apologize. Thank you.                         | 2  | Mr. Silverberg poses about who was                     |\n| 3  | THE WITNESS: Sorry about that.                  | 3  | retaining Verdolino and Lowey?                         |\n| 4  | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: I appreciate                  | 4  | A.<br>Well, I was pretty sure when he                  |\n| 5  | that.                                           | 5  | wrote I would think you're going to be                 |\n| 6  | MS. ARONSSON: The Court                         | 6  | retained by the client as his financial                |\n| 7  | Reporter is going to mark what is               | 7  | advisor, that's -- I made a gratuitous                 |\n| 8  | going to be Jalbert Exhibit 3. This             | 8  | comment or not a gratuitous comment. I                 |\n| 9  | document is Bates stamped Kwok                  | 9  | made an assenting comment basically saying             |\n| 10 | 00001649.                                       | 10 | I think if we're going to hold the cash, we            |\n| 11 | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                    | 11 | need to be employed by the debtor. So                  |\n| 12 | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 3 for                 | 12 | concurring with the decision or the thought            |\n| 13 | identification as of this date by the           | 13 | that he had.                                           |\n| 14 | Reporter.)                                      | 14 | Q.<br>What is the basis for the                        |\n| 15 | Q.<br>Please take a look at this                | 15 | understanding that you just explained?                 |\n| 16 | document.                                       | 16 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                          |\n| 17 | A.<br>Okay.                                     | 17 | A.<br>Of what part?                                    |\n| 18 | Q.<br>You're responding to Mr.                  | 18 | Q.<br>Where, turning to your e-mail,                   |\n| 19 | Silverberg's e-mail that we were just           | 19 | \"if we are going to hold the cash, we'll               |\n| 20 | speaking about with the big Q is whether        | 20 | need to be employed by the debtor\". What's             |\n| 21 | it's us retaining you or the client.            | 21 | the basis of that statement?                           |\n| 22 | A.<br>Okay.                                     | 22 | A.<br>Well, my professional judgment.                  |\n| 23 | Q.<br>Turning to your response, you             | 23 | If me, as a principal of Verdolino and                 |\n| 24 | note, \"I'd like a post-petition retainer if     | 24 | Lowey, was going to be the signer on a                 |\n| 25 | possible\". Do you see that?<br>Page 35          | 25 | debtor in possession bank account, it would<br>Page 37 |\n\n10 (Pages 34 - 37)\n\n<span id=\"page-11-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                            |          |                                                                                     |\n|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                    | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |\n| 2        | make all the sense in the world that that                     | 2        | A.<br>Well, frequently in matters,                                                  |\n| 3        | debtor in possession was my client. So I'm                    | 3        | we -- the firm gets brought in and we do                                            |\n| 4        | concurring effectively with the                               | 4        | whatever work is intended on that                                                   |\n| 5        | determination that Mr. Silverberg made in                     | 5        | particular engagement. Frequently, it's                                             |\n| 6        | the previous e-mail to this chain.                            | 6        | litigation support. If it's intended that                                           |\n| 7        | Q.<br>Thank you. Just for my own                              | 7        | we do an investigation, the lawyer's                                                |\n| 8        | understanding, what is the difference                         | 8        | thinking ahead, look, you're going to do an                                         |\n| 9        | between being employed by the debtor versus                   | 9        | investigation, we think this is what we're                                          |\n| 10       | Brown Rudnick?                                                | 10       | going to find. Then we're going to have to                                          |\n| 11       | A.<br>Well, if I was employed by                              | 11       | get a expert report to file with a                                                  |\n| 12       | Brown Rudnick, I'm not sure I'd go                            | 12       | particular court. Then we might need you                                            |\n| 13       | through -- I'm not sure I would have to go                    | 13       | to go through the process of discovery                                              |\n| 14       | through the employment process for the                        | 14       | including records, depositions and the like                                         |\n| 15       | bankruptcy. Would I file a motion to be                       | 15       | and then we might need you to testify. In                                           |\n| 16       | employed? I don't know. I don't know the                      | 16       | those particular cases, as I understand it,                                         |\n| 17       | answer to that question. It's not                             | 17       | there would be privilege up to a certain                                            |\n| 18       | something that I thought of beyond this.                      | 18       | point, up until the time I'm declared an                                            |\n| 19       | So -- but if I was right and there wouldn't                   | 19       | expert but in other instances, we get                                               |\n| 20       | be an opportunity to file a motion to                         | 20       | brought in as -- as financial advisor to                                            |\n| 21       | employ Verdolino and Lowey on behalf of the                   | 21       | the attorneys. They want us to do an                                                |\n| 22       | debtor, I don't know how we would then                        | 22       | investigation. They want us to uncover                                              |\n| 23       | allow me to be a signatory on the debtor's                    | 23       | whatever need to be uncovered, whatever the                                         |\n| 24       | account.                                                      | 24       | allegations are, whatever the issues are                                            |\n| 25       | Q.<br>Thank you. That's helpful.                              | 25       | but they might be hiring another firm or                                            |\n|          |                                                               |          |                                                                                     |\n|          | Page 38                                                       |          | Page 40                                                                             |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                    | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |\n| 2        | Did you rely on Brown Rudnick in connection                   | 2        | individual to testify as the expert to keep                                         |\n| 3        | with that determination of who would be                       | 3        | what knowledge we have as privileged. I                                             |\n| 4        | retaining Verdolino and Lowey?                                | 4        | don't know that that's relevant here.                                               |\n| 5        | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                 | 5        | Q.<br>Thank you. Turning back to                                                    |\n| 6        | A.<br>Well, Mr. Silverberg writes in                          | 6        | Exhibit 2 --                                                                        |\n| 7        | his e-mail, \"I would think you're retained                    | 7        | MR. MILTENBERGER: I'm sorry to                                                      |\n| 8        | by the client as his financial advisor\" and                   | 8        | interrupt. I'm being called away to                                                 |\n| 9        | the next e-mail, same day, when I got                         | 9        | another matter so I'm going to have                                                 |\n| 10       | around to it at 6:49 p.m. -- so five hours                    | 10       | to drop off now. The record could                                                   |\n| 11       | had elapsed -- I basically concurred with                     | 11       | just note that I'm leaving the                                                      |\n| 12       | his determination. Who made the decision,                     | 12       | deposition.                                                                         |\n| 13       | I don't know. It's semantics but I think                      | 13       | MR. HARBACH: Thank you, Tim.                                                        |\n| 14       | it was clear from this point on, that we                      | 14       | You're welcome to rejoin anytime.                                                   |\n| 15       | were going to be retained by the debtor and                   | 15       | MR. MILTENBERGER: Will do,                                                          |\n| 16       | not Brown Rudnick.                                            | 16       | thanks.                                                                             |\n| 17       | Q.<br>Is Verdolino and Lowey ever                             | 17       | Q.<br>I'm interested in your e-mail                                                 |\n| 18       | retained by a law firm in connection with                     | 18       | at the top where you write, \"my feeling is                                          |\n| 19<br>20 | bankruptcy proceedings?<br>A.<br>We're frequently retained by | 19<br>20 | that in an individual case, the FA\" --<br>financial advisor -- \"duties are markedly |\n| 21       | lawyers in proceedings. I think even                          | 21       | different than of an operating business                                             |\n| 22       | including in bankruptcy proceedings for the                   | 22       | case\". Can you explain to me the                                                    |\n| 23       | purposes of the privilege.                                    | 23       | difference between an individual case                                               |\n| 24       | Q.<br>What do you mean by for                                 | 24       | versus an operating business case?                                                  |\n| 25       | purposes of the privilege?<br>Page 39                         | 25       | A.<br>So operating business cases<br>Page 41                                        |\n\n11 (Pages 38 - 41)\n\n<span id=\"page-12-0\"></span>\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                     |\n|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2        | have their various size and shapes. They                                 | 2        | engagement, no one informed you what needed                                    |\n| 3        | may have affiliated entities, parents,                                   | 3        | to be done on this case?                                                       |\n| 4        | siblings. It could be multiple debtors.                                  | 4        | A.<br>Well, we had been party to                                               |\n| 5        | They might have employees in various                                     | 5        | numerous conversations. This is not my                                         |\n| 6        | countries, various states. They may have                                 | 6        | first bankruptcy. It's not my 50th                                             |\n| 7        | payroll taxes un-filed, sales taxes                                      | 7        | bankruptcy. It's not my 100th bankruptcy.                                      |\n| 8        | un-filed, depending on the business, bottle                              | 8        | I had a fairly good idea of what the issues                                    |\n| 9        | deposits un-filed and unkept. They                                       | 9        | were going to be and I took the first pass.                                    |\n| 10       | probably need a lot more work on budgeting                               | 10       | I don't recall whether there were changes                                      |\n| 11       | and keeping the business operating. Does                                 | 11       | made after that or not.                                                        |\n| 12       | it have sufficient cash, what are the 13                                 | 12       | Q.<br>Generally, what is the scope of                                          |\n| 13       | week budgets, the one year budgets. Cash                                 | 13       | Verdolino and Lowey's work in this case?                                       |\n| 14       | collateral where it's -- you've got a                                    | 14       | A.<br>In this case?                                                            |\n| 15       | secured creditor who is frequently -- maybe                              | 15       | Q.<br>Yes.                                                                     |\n| 16       | not against the debtor but maybe not with                                | 16       | A.<br>Well, the retention papers                                               |\n| 17       | it either. So -- so there's just -- it's a                               | 17       | speak for themselves. So if you want to go                                     |\n| 18       | totally different beast. In this                                         | 18       | line by line, put that in front of me.                                         |\n| 19       | particular case, some individuals have                                   | 19       | Q.<br>Sure.                                                                    |\n| 20       | operating real estate or something like                                  | 20       | A.<br>To date, we've been focused                                              |\n| 21       | that but they rarely have an operating                                   | 21       | on -- first, my recollection is the SOFA's                                     |\n| 22       | business that's multi country, multi state                               | 22       | and the schedules pretty much                                                  |\n| 23       | with employees and all sorts of reporting                                | 23       | simultaneously. I mean they were due the                                       |\n| 24       | requirements, compliance requirements.                                   | 24       | same day, same time. So that was first.                                        |\n| 25       | Q.<br>Is it fair to say the financial                                    | 25       | Following -- immediately following that, I                                     |\n|          | Page 42                                                                  |          | Page 44                                                                        |\n|          |                                                                          |          |                                                                                |\n|          |                                                                          |          |                                                                                |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                     |\n| 2        | advisor duties in connection with an                                     | 2        | believe we worked on everybody's engagement                                    |\n| 3        | operating business case are more                                         | 3        | papers to get them filed in the Court and                                      |\n| 4        | complicated than an individual case?                                     | 4        | then -- probably while the tail end of that                                    |\n| 5        | A.<br>In most, yes.                                                      | 5        | was going along, I believe my colleague,                                       |\n| 6        | Q.<br>Turning away from the exhibit,                                     | 6        | Matt Flynn, started preparing the monthly                                      |\n| 7        | who instructed Verdolino and Lowey on the                                | 7        | operating report that was due for the end                                      |\n| 8        | scope of work in this matter?                                            | 8        | of February, sometime around March 20, 21,                                     |\n| 9        | A.<br>I don't think anyone instructed                                    | 9        | 22, somewhere around there. Trying to                                          |\n| 10       | us.                                                                      | 10       | think if we've done anything -- oh                                             |\n| 11       | Q.<br>Because you drafted the                                            | 11       | assistance in preparing for -- or                                              |\n| 12       | engagement letter?                                                       | 12       | participation in preparing, to a small                                         |\n| 13       | A.<br>I'm sure there were discussions                                    | 13       | degree, for the debtor to attend the 341                                       |\n| 14       | with counsel. I don't remember the                                       | 14       | meeting. We attended the first day 341                                         |\n| 15       | discussions specifically but this is not                                 | 15       | meeting by telephone. My colleague, Matt                                       |\n| 16       | the first time I've drafted a retention --                               | 16       | Flynn and I, attended the second day of the                                    |\n| 17       | at least part of the retention papers.                                   | 17       | 341 hearing which was this past Wednesday                                      |\n| 18       | Obviously, I'm not a lawyer. I don't know                                | 18       | on a -- how do I want to call it -- we                                         |\n| 19       | all of that goes into retention papers but                               | 19       | didn't bill for our time. I went as an                                         |\n| 20       | as to the duties, typically, I have an                                   | 20       | observer. We knew we weren't going to be                                       |\n| 21       | input as to what the duties are. I'm sure                                | 21       | participating but we wanted to be around to                                    |\n| 22       | we took the first stab at it and in review                               | 22       | see what took place, meet people and then                                      |\n| 23       | by Brown Rudnick, they might have made some                              | 23       | this deposition.                                                               |\n| 24<br>25 | changes. I don't remember how that went.<br>Q.<br>In connection with the | 24<br>25 | Q.<br>Thank you. So I think I heard<br>the SOFA's and schedules were the first |\n\n12 (Pages 42 - 45)\n\n<span id=\"page-13-0\"></span>Page 46 1 C. JALBERT 2 step. You talked about drafting everyone's 3 engagement papers in connection with this 4 matter. 5 A. Well, drafting our engagement 6 papers. Everyone was focusing on their own 7 and I needed help, because I'm not a 8 lawyer, on mine. 9 Q. Then you talked about Matt 10 Flynn's responsibilities in connection with 11 the monthly operating report. 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. Finally, you talked about 14 preparing for the 341 hearing and attending 15 the 341 hearings? 16 A. Meeting, yes. 17 Q. Can you describe a little bit 18 more your responsibilities in connection 19 with those 341 meetings? 20 MR. AULET: I would just 21 caution the Witness not to disclose 22 any work product or conversations 23 with attorneys. 24 A. On the first day of the 341 25 meeting, it was just thought that we should Page 47 1 C. JALBERT 2 participate because it was unclear what was 3 going to arise and they didn't know if it 4 would be something that we would need. 5 Q. Setting aside your 6 conversations with your attorneys, what -- 7 did you have any understanding about what 8 might arise during the first day of the 341 9 hearing that might require your 10 participation? 11 A. I've attended an awful lot of 12 341 meetings over my career. Anything can 13 happen at a 341 meeting because it's open 14 to every creditor and god only knows what 15 takes place. 16 Q. Did you anticipate having to 17 participate or ask questions during the 18 341? 19 A. I think we were asked to be on 20 the phone. I didn't have a participation 21 one way or another. 22 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 23 Reporter is going to hand you what is 24 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 4. 25 (Whereupon, Debtor's Page 48 1 C. JALBERT 2 Application was marked as Jalbert 3 Exhibit 4 for identification as of 4 this date by the Reporter.) 5 MS. ARONSSON: For the record, 6 this is a document entitled Debtors 7 Application for Authorization to 8 Retain and Employ Verdolino and Lowey 9 PC as Financial Advisor. It was 10 filed in this case as Docket 90. 11 Q. Mr. Jalbert, feel free to look 12 at this document. 13 A. Is there something you're 14 trying to point me to? 15 Q. Do you recognize this document? 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. What is it? 18 A. Debtor's Application for 19 Authorization to Retain and Employ 20 Verdolino and Lowey PC as Financial 21 Advisor. 22 Q. Turning to Page 18 of the 23 document, using the page numbers at the top 24 of the page, what is this document? 25 A. Affidavit of Craig R. Jalbert Page 49 1 C. JALBERT 2 in Support of Debtor's Application for 3 Authorization to Retain and Employ 4 Verdolino and Lowey PC as Financial 5 Advisor. 6 Q. So you recognize this as your 7 affidavit you filed -- 8 A. I do. 9 Q. Turning to Page 21, the table 10 -- I'm interested in the table at the 11 bottom of the page. 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. Just stepping back I think you 14 mentioned folks at Verdolino who were 15 involved, Matt Flynn -- in this case, Matt 16 Flynn, Mary Jo Schindler and yourself. Is 17 there anyone else involved in this matter 18 at Verdolino and Lowey? 19 A. I mentioned Tim MacDonald, our 20 IT person who is only involved with -- 21 related to the deposition, the search of 22 our e-mails and the server records and 23 everything and getting it ported over to 24 Brown Rudnick to be then sent to you folks. 25 Q. Anyone else at Verdolino and\n\n> Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n13 (Pages 46 - 49)\n\n<span id=\"page-14-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                       | 1  | C. JALBERT                                         |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------|----|----------------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | Lowey?                                           | 2  | different than any other engagement. You           |\n| 3  | A.<br>Not that I know of.                        | 3  | don't know what's going to happen in               |\n| 4  | Q.<br>Turning to this table, is Matt             | 4  | day-to-day and everyone responds as best           |\n| 5  | Flynn also a principal?                          | 5  | they can, as efficiently as they can and           |\n| 6  | A.<br>No.                                        | 6  | whatever the issues are that are ongoing           |\n| 7  | Q.<br>What is Matt Flynn's role?                 | 7  | and the crises that materialize.                   |\n| 8  | A.<br>A manager.                                 | 8  | Q.<br>What about staff, what sort of               |\n| 9  | Q.<br>Is Mindy Jo Schindler a                    | 9  | role do you anticipate any potential staff         |\n| 10 | principal?                                       | 10 | to play in this case?                              |\n| 11 | A.<br>No.                                        | 11 | A.<br>It will depend on how it plays               |\n| 12 | Q.<br>What is her role?                          | 12 | out. I don't think it's going to happen            |\n| 13 | A.<br>Manager.                                   | 13 | but if it did and we became -- I became the        |\n|    |                                                  |    |                                                    |\n| 14 | Q.<br>So in connection with this                 | 14 | sole signer on the debtor in possession            |\n| 15 | engagement at Verdolino and Lowey, there's       | 15 | bank account, my firm would probably be --         |\n| 16 | one principal, two managers and then the IT      | 16 | the bookkeepers would probably keep records        |\n| 17 | person?                                          | 17 | of the disbursements and the receipts.             |\n| 18 | A.<br>I believe so, yes.                         | 18 | They would assist with reporting. I would          |\n| 19 | Q.<br>Do you anticipate other                    | 19 | probably review it of course. If, at some          |\n| 20 | Verdolino and Lowey employees to become          | 20 | point in time, we have claim objections, I         |\n| 21 | involved in this matter?                         | 21 | don't know what the nature of those                |\n| 22 | A.<br>As the case progresses,                    | 22 | objections are going to be, I don't know           |\n| 23 | assuming that we come into the case, yes.        | 23 | how big and how complicated but some of our        |\n| 24 | Q.<br>Generally, what are the duties             | 24 | staff might be involved in claims. The             |\n| 25 | of a principal in connection with a<br>Page 50   | 25 | debtor might have to file an income tax<br>Page 52 |\n|    |                                                  |    |                                                    |\n|    |                                                  |    |                                                    |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                       | 1  | C. JALBERT                                         |\n| 2  | bankruptcy case like this?                       | 2  | return. I'll be advising them that they            |\n| 3  | A.<br>I think of it as partner,                  | 3  | should file an income tax return for the           |\n| 4  | director, managing director, any of those,       | 4  | Estate. So we'll have tax people involved          |\n| 5  | the lead person on the case from the firm.       | 5  | in the preparation of the income taxes and         |\n| 6  | Q.<br>In connection with this matter             | 6  | I would have to go down the list of -- and         |\n| 7  | specifically, what do you expect the             | 7  | be able to predict exactly what's going to         |\n| 8  | principal to be doing?                           | 8  | take place but we're very efficient, very          |\n| 9  | A.<br>I assisted in preparation of               | 9  | accustomed. We know all of our fees are            |\n| 10 | the SOFA's and schedules, the global notes,      | 10 | subject to review by every single party and        |\n| 11 | the specific part of the global notes. I         | 11 | interest. So we're -- we use as reasonably         |\n| 12 | assisted with the monthly operating report.      | 12 | low level as we can on every matter and I          |\n| 13 | I participated with the first day hearings       | 13 | can't predict beyond that what's going to          |\n| 14 | -- excuse me, first -- not the first day         | 14 | come up but that staff and bookkeepers get         |\n| 15 | hearing. The first day of the 341 meeting.       | 15 | used for those types of issues.                    |\n| 16 | Responding to inquiries from the various         | 16 | Q.<br>Is it fair to say your answer                |\n| 17 | lawyers and supporting staff on whatever         | 17 | to my question about staff applies to the          |\n| 18 | roles that they are working on.                  | 18 | bookkeepers, to the role of the                    |\n| 19 | Q.<br>What do you expect managers to             | 19 | bookkeepers?                                       |\n| 20 | do in connection with this case?                 | 20 | A.<br>No, bookkeepers and staff.                   |\n| 21 | A.<br>The same -- the same things.               | 21 | Q.<br>So the answer that you just                  |\n| 22 | Maybe differing amounts, different types.        | 22 | gave applies to both of those?                     |\n| 23 | I'm more review. Depending on what it is,        | 23 | A.<br>You asked what they may do.                  |\n| 24 | they might support me. I might support           | 24 | Q.<br>Right.                                       |\n| 25 | them. It's like this engagement is no<br>Page 51 | 25 | A.<br>They're -- the bookkeepers<br>Page 53        |\n\n14 (Pages 50 - 53)\n\n<span id=\"page-15-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n|----|---------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | aren't going to do reporting but they're    | 2  | A.<br>From my firm?                         |\n| 3  | going to maintain receipts and              | 3  | Q.<br>Who at V&L?                           |\n| 4  | disbursements. A staff person would         | 4  | A.<br>Myself, Matthew Flynn and Mary        |\n| 5  | probably work on the form of the -- of a    | 5  | Jo Schindler.                               |\n| 6  | financial statement or whatever report      | 6  | Q.<br>Who else was involved in              |\n| 7  | that's going to be issued. The staff are    | 7  | preparing these filings?                    |\n| 8  | going to work on claims objections. Tax     | 8  | A.<br>There might have been a               |\n| 9  | professionals are going to work on tax      | 9  | technical question for someone related to   |\n| 10 | returns.                                    | 10 | the best case but I can't think of anything |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Are you finished with your            | 11 | else -- anyone else that had any -- that    |\n| 12 | answer?                                     | 12 | did work on it.                             |\n| 13 | A.<br>Yes.                                  | 13 | Q.<br>Did Brown Rudnick work on the         |\n| 14 | Q.<br>You mentioned receipts and            | 14 | SOFA and schedules?                         |\n| 15 | disbursements. What sorts of receipts and   | 15 | A.<br>You asked me for my firm. Of          |\n| 16 | disbursements do you anticipate in this     | 16 | course they worked on them, as did Melissa, |\n| 17 | case?                                       | 17 | as did -- that's Melissa Francis. As did    |\n| 18 | A.<br>I would imagine if things were        | 18 | Aaron Mitchell. So it was clearly not all   |\n| 19 | to go the way the debtor planned, there was | 19 | Verdolino and Lowey. It was -- the whole    |\n| 20 | a proposed DIP financing arrangement where  | 20 | team was involved in the preparation. I     |\n| 21 | money will come into the Estate and then    | 21 | thought you asked me -- and if I            |\n| 22 | would presumably be used to pay various     | 22 | misunderstood, I apologize -- you asked     |\n| 23 | professionals and United States Trustee     | 23 | who, at Verdolino, did and that was myself, |\n| 24 | fees and whatever other disbursements are   | 24 | Matt Flynn and Mary Jo Schindler.           |\n| 25 | required of the debtor as ordered by the    | 25 | Q.<br>Thank you. Yes, I did ask             |\n|    |                                             |    | Page 56                                     |\n|    | Page 54                                     |    |                                             |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2  | Court or otherwise generally required to    | 2  | Verdolino and Lowey and was then moving on. |\n| 3  | pay Chapter 11 bills as they become due. I  | 3  | So you mentioned Melissa Francis, Aaron     |\n| 4  | think that's it.                            | 4  | Mitchell, Brown Rudnick. Generally, anyone  |\n| 5  | Q.<br>The last item is clerical.            | 5  | else?                                       |\n| 6  | What sort of duties do you anticipate a     | 6  | A.<br>While I never spoke to them,          |\n| 7  | clerical member of your team to do in this  | 7  | there must have been the existence of help  |\n| 8  | case?                                       | 8  | from individuals that translated documents  |\n| 9  | A.<br>I don't have anything that I          | 9  | and words from the various professionals to |\n| 10 | have presupposed for them to do in this     | 10 | the debtor and the debtor.                  |\n| 11 | case.                                       | 11 | Q.<br>Did you communicate with the          |\n| 12 | Q.<br>Turning back in the document to       | 12 | debtor about this SOFA and schedules?       |\n| 13 | the retention agreement, this is on Page    | 13 | A.<br>No.                                   |\n| 14 | 13. We've talked generally about the        | 14 | Q.<br>You mentioned some translated         |\n| 15 | engagement -- Verdolino and Lowey's         | 15 | documents. Did you receive those            |\n| 16 | engagement in this case. I want to walk     | 16 | translated documents in connection with     |\n| 17 | through these bullet points on the first    | 17 | your work on the SOFA and schedules?        |\n| 18 | page. The first one reads, \"assistance      | 18 | A.<br>No. I don't read Mandarin.            |\n| 19 | with preparation of the statement of        | 19 | Q.<br>Did you see any translated            |\n| 20 | financial affairs and the schedules and all | 20 | documents?                                  |\n| 21 | support thereto and any amendments\". These  | 21 | A.<br>I don't recall seeing them.           |\n| 22 | have been filed, right?                     | 22 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.               |\n| 23 | A.<br>Yes.                                  | 23 | Q.<br>Do you know whether Golden            |\n| 24 | Q.<br>Who was involved in preparing         | 24 | Spring was involved in preparing the SOFA   |\n| 25 | the SOFA and the schedules?<br>Page 55      | 25 | and schedules?<br>Page 57                   |\n\n15 (Pages 54 - 57)\n\n85\n\n<span id=\"page-16-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                          | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | A.<br>I wouldn't know.                              | 2  | doing in connection with the SOFA and       |\n| 3  | Q.<br>Do you know what Golden Spring                | 3  | schedule?                                   |\n| 4  | is?                                                 | 4  | A.<br>I don't know that it's                |\n| 5  | A.<br>Yes.                                          | 5  | anticipated but to the extent facts and     |\n| 6  | Q.<br>What is it?                                   | 6  | circumstances, at some point in time,       |\n| 7  | A.<br>It's -- as I understand it -- a               | 7  | require a review and possible amendment, I  |\n| 8  | family office in New York City for the              | 8  | think we would have to participate because  |\n| 9  | debtor's son. Exactly how it's run, all             | 9  | we're the ones that know Best Case and have |\n| 10 | that, I don't have any information.                 | 10 | that system but there's nothing             |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Who is the debtor's son?                      | 11 | anticipated. It's only if that              |\n| 12 | A.<br>I don't know his name.                        | 12 | materializes, we would participate.         |\n| 13 | Debtor's son.                                       | 13 | Q.<br>You've said -- you've mentioned       |\n| 14 | Q.<br>Neither you nor anyone at                     | 14 | Best Case a couple times. What do you mean  |\n| 15 | Verdolino and Lowey met with or                     | 15 | by that?                                    |\n| 16 | communicated with the debtor about the SOFA         | 16 | A.<br>It's a software that the              |\n| 17 | and schedules?                                      | 17 | industry uses. I think it's the most        |\n| 18 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                       | 18 | prominent software that supports the        |\n| 19 | A.<br>Correct.                                      | 19 | preparation of SOFA's and -- SOFA's and the |\n| 20 | Q.<br>Can you describe what work                    | 20 | schedules. I think they're used throughout  |\n| 21 | Verdolino and Lowey did in preparing the            | 21 | the industry by most everybody.             |\n| 22 | SOFA and schedules?                                 | 22 | Q.<br>So is it fair to say it's like        |\n| 23 | A.<br>We participated with several                  | 23 | a TurboTax of preparing SOFA's and          |\n| 24 | lengthy phone calls with various people             | 24 | schedules?                                  |\n| 25 | from Brown Rudnick, not all of whom I'm             | 25 | A.<br>Or QuickBooks or -- you know.         |\n|    | Page 58                                             |    | Page 60                                     |\n|    |                                                     |    |                                             |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                          | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2  | going to remember were on the phone and             | 2  | Q.<br>So that software is essentially       |\n| 3  | also with Melissa Francis and Aaron                 | 3  | garbage in, garbage out, right?             |\n| 4  | Mitchell. Aaron Mitchell and Melissa                | 4  | MR. AULET: Objection.                       |\n| 5  | Francis provided significant levels of              | 5  | A.<br>Every software is garbage in,         |\n| 6  | input of various information. Brown                 | 6  | garbage out.                                |\n| 7  | Rudnick had been involved in the case               | 7  | Q.<br>Turning to the second bullet          |\n| 8  | before we were. They already had a large            | 8  | point in the retention agreement, it reads, |\n| 9  | knowledge base so we -- we talked with              | 9  | \"assistance with preparation and/or review  |\n| 10 | Brown Rudnick team and Melissa and Aaron on         | 10 | of cash flow and related budget projections |\n| 11 | the phone and then numerous e-mails.                | 11 | and including advising as to post-filing    |\n| 12 | THE WITNESS: I agree. Hot.                          | 12 | finances\". Do you see that?                 |\n| 13 | MR. HARBACH: Yeah, I tried to                       | 13 | A.<br>Yes.                                  |\n| 14 | keep out the sun.                                   | 14 | Q.<br>What work has Verdolino and           |\n| 15 | Q.<br>Did Verdolino and Lowey perform               | 15 | Lowey done in connection with this line     |\n| 16 | any investigation to verify information             | 16 | item?                                       |\n| 17 | obtained from Brown Rudnick, Melissa                | 17 | A.<br>Nothing.                              |\n| 18 | Francis or Aaron Mitchell?                          | 18 | Q.<br>What work does Verdolino and          |\n| 19 | A.<br>No.                                           | 19 | Lowey anticipate doing in connection with   |\n| 20 | Q.<br>So is it fair to say you took                 | 20 | this line item?                             |\n| 21 | their word regarding the representations            | 21 | A.<br>Anticipate doing this if we're        |\n| 22 | contained in the SOFA and the schedule?             | 22 | in the case and there's a DIP.              |\n| 23 | A.<br>That's fair.                                  | 23 | Q.<br>So it includes budget                 |\n| 24 | Q.<br>Is there any outstanding work                 | 24 | projections. Budget projections for who?    |\n| 25 | that Verdolino and Lowey will anticipate<br>Page 59 | 25 | A.<br>I imagine we will try and<br>Page 61  |\n\n16 (Pages 58 - 61)\n\n<span id=\"page-17-0\"></span>Page 62 1 C. JALBERT 2 establish what a budget would be for -- for 3 instance, committee counsel and its 4 financial advisors, debtor's counsel and 5 their financial advisors, the United States 6 Trustees fees. There were a number of 7 firms that were intended to be ordinary 8 course professionals and any other 9 anticipated disbursement in the case that's 10 approved in one way, shape or form by court 11 order. 12 Q. It also includes review of cash 13 flow. What cash flow? 14 A. The DIP money. 15 Q. The debtor has no income, 16 right? 17 A. To my knowledge, correct. 18 Q. Have you reviewed the debtor's 19 declaration filed in this case? 20 A. I certainly reviewed one or two 21 of the drafts of it. I don't know that I 22 saw the final or not. I don't remember. 23 Q. Are there cash flows coming in 24 from any source at the moment? 25 A. Into the Estate? Page 63 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. Yes. 3 A. Not to my knowledge. 4 Q. Your knowledge of the debtor's 5 lack of income is based on what you've been 6 told, is that right? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. No independent investigation in 9 connection with his income? 10 A. Correct. 11 Q. This line item also references 12 post-filing finances. What is meant by 13 that? 14 A. He filed on February 15th. 15 Whatever finances, cash receipts, cash 16 disbursements, budgeting from that day 17 forward. 18 Q. The third line item reads, 19 \"opening and maintaining the DIP account 20 and effectuating disbursements when 21 necessary and providing accounting of all 22 cash activity\". Is it your understanding 23 there's a DIP loan here? 24 A. No. 25 Q. Do you anticipate there being a Page 64 1 C. JALBERT 2 DIP loan in this case? 3 A. Hope so. 4 Q. Do you have experience with DIP 5 loans? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. How much experience do you 8 have? 9 A. I don't know how many hundred 10 cases with DIP loans. 11 Q. What work has Verdolino and 12 Lowey done in connection with this line 13 item? 14 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 15 A. We're talking about the third 16 one, right, opening and maintaining the DIP 17 account? 18 Q. Yes. 19 A. The only thing I did, when 20 asked by Brown Rudnick if I'd be willing, 21 is I consulted with a bank that does -- 22 that's on the list of approved financial 23 institutions of the Department of Justice. 24 I checked with that bank, which I use 25 frequently in and out of bankruptcy, to Page 65 1 C. JALBERT 2 confirm that they would allow me to be a 3 signer on the DIP account and they 4 responded in yes. That's the extent of 5 which I've done on that. 6 Q. Is that Citizens Bank that 7 you're referencing? 8 A. Yes. 9 Q. Has Verdolino and Lowey been 10 involved in the negotiation of the 11 potential DIP loan? 12 A. No. 13 Q. Has Verdolino and Lowey been 14 included on any communications regarding 15 the potential DIP loan? 16 A. I don't know. 17 Q. Have you personally been 18 involved in any written or oral 19 communications regarding the DIP loan? 20 A. I don't recall any. 21 Q. Do you have an understanding as 22 to how the potential DIP loan would be 23 structured? 24 A. Well, I briefly read the DIP 25 loan at some point in time. I don't have 85\n\n> Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n17 (Pages 62 - 65)\n\n<span id=\"page-18-0\"></span>Page 66 1 C. JALBERT an explicit memory of every -- of the whole thing but I know generally how DIP loans work. 5 Q. In this case, do you know how the DIP loan would potentially be structured? 8 A. I would have to be guessing at my memory. 10 Q. Who, at Verdolino and Lowey, would perform the work in connection with this line item? 13 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 14 A. Presupposing that there is a DIP loan? 16 Q. Yes. 17 A. It would -- as repeating, obviously, I would be the signatory on the account. There would be bookkeepers and staff associated with preparing the checks, preparing the reports and reporting to all the parties that be. Some -- I imagine the committee would want to know -- generally, they would like to know on a weekly or biweekly basis what receipts and Page 67 1 C. JALBERT disbursements are, major creditors might feel the same way. So whatever the -- whatever the case is, reporting requirements as they develop, we would take care of that. I don't know what they would be. Aside from the minimum requirement, the monthly operating report. 9 Q. What is Verdolino and Lowey's run rate up until this point? 11 A. What's a run rate? 12 Q. How much has Verdolino and Lowey billed to this matter? 14 A. We've billed zero so far. 15 Q. How much value does Verdolino anticipate it has already billed in this case? 18 A. Are you asking for a WIP to date? 20 Q. What is a WIP to date? 21 A. Work in process hours? 22 Q. Yes, please. 23 A. I have no idea. 24 Q. Does Verdolino and Lowey have any agreement with anyone regarding who Page 68 1 C. JALBERT will pay the fees in the event the DIP loan does not occur? 4 A. No. 5 Q. Let's turn to the next line item, \"preparation, review and analysis of monthly operating reports and/or quarterly reporting\". Do you see that? 9 A. Yes. 10 Q. You referenced earlier a monthly operating report that was recently filed in this case? 13 A. Yes. 14 Q. Is that the type of work anticipated in this-- in connection with this line item? 17 A. Well, going forward, there's going to be a lot more than a monthly operating report because there's going to be -- well, presumably, if there is a DIP and if the case continues, there's going to be receipts and disbursements and even if there aren't, the monthly operating report and the US Trustees Office requires that -- the disclosure of all estate professionals Page 69 1 C. JALBERT as they accrue throughout the case. So it didn't happen in the February one because of the scrambling of SOFA's and schedules and 341 meeting and everything else. Going forward, we're going to have to have a report on a monthly basis and a cumulative basis what everybody's fees are, what the cash in and cash out is and part of the monthly operating report calculates the fees due to the United States Trustee Program and then the monthly operating report, you typically have to also -- you attach to it insurance binders, if things expired. If they weren't usually -- usually, I put them in anyway just to avoid confusion and someone looking for it. And then complete copies of the bank statements. The United States Trustees Office also wants balance sheet and P&L and cash flow and what the accounts payable, accounts receivable and all the various -- so the first one was filed. Future ones are going to have a lot more information. 25 Q. Taking a step back, can you\n\n> Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n18 (Pages 66 - 69)\n\n<span id=\"page-19-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                   | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n|----|----------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | just explain, generally, what a monthly      | 2  | A.<br>The United States Trustee             |\n| 3  | operating report is in a Chapter 11          | 3  | issues bills predicated on the monthly      |\n| 4  | individual case?                             | 4  | operating report, to what the expenses that |\n| 5  | A.<br>It's the same or pretty close          | 5  | meet the definition of a disbursement on    |\n| 6  | to the same I think as the operating report  | 6  | account of the U.S. Trustees form, they     |\n| 7  | in a commercial case. It looked like it to   | 7  | combine the three months in every calender  |\n| 8  | me anyway's. But it's the standard --        | 8  | quarter. So for us, it will be the          |\n| 9  | during the pendency of the case, the         | 9  | February 15th, the February 28th stub       |\n| 10 | operating report, that is required by the    | 10 | period, plus the March 1 to March 31, that  |\n| 11 | US Trustees Program, up until the case is    | 11 | MOR. The sum of those 45 days will be in a  |\n| 12 | dismissed, converted or confirmed.           | 12 | bill from the U.S. Trustees Office and,     |\n| 13 | Q.<br>So the procedures that you             | 13 | assuming it's correct, would have to be     |\n| 14 | described relating to the work on the        | 14 | paid before the end of -- I believe this    |\n| 15 | monthly operating report, that presupposes   | 15 | month.                                      |\n| 16 | the approval of the DIP loan and managing    | 16 | Q.<br>So is it fair to say that             |\n| 17 | of those funds. Is that right?               | 17 | Verdolino and Lowey is retained to review   |\n| 18 | A.<br>Well, the monthly operating            | 18 | the quarterly report?                       |\n| 19 | report is going to be due irrespective of    | 19 | A.<br>I don't know if it's listed in        |\n| 20 | that. The -- the accrual of the -- of the    | 20 | here specifically but certainly the monthly |\n| 21 | fees of committee counsel, us, the           | 21 | operating report is the form that is the    |\n| 22 | accountant advisor, the debtor, debtor       | 22 | input to the United States Trustees Office  |\n| 23 | committee, others, whoever might be paid by  | 23 | in order to create the bill. So we know --  |\n| 24 | the Estate including th ordinary course.     | 24 | and it's the fees are statutorily           |\n| 25 | Even if there's not a DIP, that has to be    | 25 | determined based on the level of            |\n|    | Page 70                                      |    | Page 72                                     |\n|    |                                              |    |                                             |\n|    |                                              |    |                                             |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                   | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2  | reported in the monthly operating report.    | 2  | disbursements. It's very easy to double     |\n| 3  | Q.<br>You prepared one monthly               | 3  | check their work. We would do that and      |\n| 4  | operating report to date?                    | 4  | make sure that the number is right. It's    |\n| 5  | A.<br>In this case?                          | 5  | frequently wrong because sometimes they     |\n| 6  | Q.<br>In this case, is that right?           | 6  | issue the bill before the March statement   |\n| 7  | A.<br>Yes.                                   | 7  | actually hits. So they're estimating.       |\n| 8  | Q.<br>Is another monthly operating           | 8  | They're generally off -- not their fault -- |\n| 9  | report in progress?                          | 9  | in the first quarter because it's not a     |\n| 10 | A.<br>Yes.                                   | 10 | full quarter. They don't have a basis for   |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Did you also prepare -- scratch        | 11 | making estimates, whatever the case may be  |\n| 12 | that. Did Verdolino and Lowey also prepare   | 12 | but we would -- we would ensure that the    |\n| 13 | the estimated monthly operating expenses     | 13 | fee paid to the U.S. Trustees is            |\n| 14 | contained in the schedule?                   | 14 | appropriate under the circumstances.        |\n| 15 | A.<br>To what are you referring to?          | 15 | Q.<br>Turning to the next line item,        |\n| 16 | Q.<br>We can come back to that.              | 16 | \"assistance with preparation and/or review  |\n| 17 | A.<br>Okay.                                  | 17 | of estate federal and state income tax      |\n| 18 | Q.<br>Have you or Verdolino and Lowey        | 18 | filings\". What work has Verdolino and       |\n| 19 | prepared a quarterly report in this case?    | 19 | Lowey done in connection with this line     |\n| 20 | A.<br>The United States Trustee              | 20 | item?                                       |\n| 21 | quarterly report?                            | 21 | A.<br>Nothing.                              |\n| 22 | Q.<br>Yes.                                   | 22 | Q.<br>I think you mentioned before          |\n| 23 | A.<br>No. We don't prepare that,             | 23 | that you were going to recommend the filing |\n| 24 | they do.                                     | 24 | of income taxes. Why do you recommend that  |\n| 25 | Q.<br>What is a quarterly report?<br>Page 71 | 25 | in this case?<br>Page 73                    |\n\n19 (Pages 70 - 73)\n\n<span id=\"page-20-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                                       |          |                                                                                   |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                        |\n| 2        | A.<br>I recommend it in every case.                                                      | 2        | legally required or not with a 505(b)                                             |\n| 3        | So individual estate tax returns,                                                        | 3        | letter.                                                                           |\n| 4        | individual estates is a separate --                                                      | 4        | Q.<br>Do you anticipate that multiple                                             |\n| 5        | completely separate and distinct entity                                                  | 5        | returns will be filed in this matter if the                                       |\n| 6        | from the individual as opposed to in a                                                   | 6        | debtor chooses to file returns.                                                   |\n| 7        | corporate case, the corporation retains its                                              | 7        | A.<br>Well, I don't know what the                                                 |\n| 8        | tax identity. You continue to file                                                       | 8        | debtor is going to do and again, it has no                                        |\n| 9        | C-corporation returns if they're a                                                       | 9        | bearing on the Estate and no bearing on                                           |\n| 10       | C-corporation, S Corp., partnership,                                                     | 10       | Verdolino and Lowey but the Estate will                                           |\n| 11       | whatever the case may be and their year end                                              | 11       | have to file -- I'll recommend that it file                                       |\n| 12       | remains whatever their year end was                                                      | 12       | a federal return. The debtor is a resident                                        |\n| 13       | established pre-petition. In a bankruptcy                                                | 13       | of Connecticut so there would be a                                                |\n| 14       | estate, the Estate is separate and distinct                                              | 14       | Connecticut estate tax return and if, for                                         |\n| 15       | from the individual. The individual has to                                               | 15       | some reason, there was income from another                                        |\n| 16       | continue to file his own individual income                                               | 16       | state, we would file from whatever state                                          |\n| 17       | taxes with whatever his individual income                                                | 17       | that that income came. So I don't know                                            |\n| 18       | that doesn't come into the Estate. In a                                                  | 18       | what it's going to be but it's at least                                           |\n| 19       | Chapter 11 case, virtually all of the                                                    | 19       | going to be Connecticut and the IRS.                                              |\n| 20       | debtor's income is supposed to come into                                                 | 20       | Q.<br>I think we covered before, it's                                             |\n| 21       | the Estate. So there really shouldn't be a                                               | 21       | your understanding that the debtor has no                                         |\n| 22       | separate one but technically, there could                                                | 22       | income in this case?                                                              |\n| 23       | be. The Estate is -- the Estate return is                                                | 23       | A.<br>Correct.                                                                    |\n| 24       | generally assigned to be December 31,                                                    | 24       | Q.<br>What work do you anticipate                                                 |\n| 25       | unless you elect otherwise. There are                                                    | 25       | Verdolino and Lowey will do in connection<br>Page 76                              |\n|          |                                                                                          |          |                                                                                   |\n|          | Page 74                                                                                  |          |                                                                                   |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                        |\n| 2        | reasons to elect otherwise but the most                                                  | 2        | with an individual tax return for the                                             |\n| 3        | important point is in order to get the --                                                | 3        | debtor?                                                                           |\n| 4        | the relief that's in the bankruptcy code                                                 | 4        | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                                     |\n| 5        | under Section 505b, in order to get that                                                 | 5        | A.<br>Well, I'd have to guess what's                                              |\n| 6        | relief, you have to file a tax return. So                                                | 6        | going to take place between February 15 and                                       |\n| 7        | I recommend, even when there's no tax due,                                               | 7        | December 31. I don't know whether there                                           |\n| 8        | that the return gets filed in order to                                                   | 8        | will be any income or not. There's                                                |\n| 9<br>10  | protect all -- everybody in the case to<br>make sure that there is not an issue that     | 9<br>10  | litigation going on. There might be<br>settlements. I don't know whether there'll |\n| 11       | gives the various taxing authorities 60                                                  | 11       | be income or not but if there is, there'll                                        |\n| 12       | days from the date of filing with the                                                    | 12       | be income. From what source, I don't know                                         |\n| 13       | 505(b) letter to elect to audit it. It's                                                 | 13       | and from where, I don't know but at a                                             |\n| 14       | the way that the case can move forward to                                                | 14       | minimum, there will be disbursements and in                                       |\n| 15       | closure and not have the seven year                                                      | 15       | a bankruptcy, there's two types of expenses                                       |\n| 16       | statute, three year statutes and the like.                                               | 16       | from a tax perspective. There are                                                 |\n| 17       | So I recommend everyone does the 505(b).                                                 | 17       | administrative expenses like professional                                         |\n| 18       | If they don't elect to audit it in the                                                   | 18       | fees and there are other types of expenses                                        |\n| 19       | first 60 days, then they lose the                                                        | 19       | that are normal to an individual. Mortgage                                        |\n| 20       | opportunity. If they select it for audit,                                                | 20       | interest, real estate taxes, whatever the                                         |\n| 21       | then they got another 120 days. I want --                                                | 21       | case may be. They are treated in different                                        |\n| 22       | I recommend it in every single case,                                                     | 22       | ways on the tax return but one of the                                             |\n| 23       | individual or corporation or partnership or                                              | 23       | reasons why you would file a return is the                                        |\n| 24<br>25 | LLC, that the tax returns get filed whether<br>they're necessary or not, whether they're | 24<br>25 | -- for tax purposes in a bankruptcy estate,<br>the fees paid to professionals are |\n\n20 (Pages 74 - 77)\n\n<span id=\"page-21-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                |          |                                                                                 |\n|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                        | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                      |\n| 2        | deductible and you can build them up like a                       | 2        | A.<br>I have no -- it's not my                                                  |\n| 3        | deferred tax asset. So to the extent, in                          | 3        | problem or interest what happens to the                                         |\n| 4        | the future -- after we spend money on the                         | 4        | debtor, outside of the bankruptcy estate.                                       |\n| 5        | case, if, in the future, there was a large                        | 5        | He's going to have to hire a different                                          |\n| 6        | settlement agreement, you would be able to                        | 6        | accountant to deal with that.                                                   |\n| 7        | offset the previous administrative NOL's                          | 7        | Q.<br>Let's talk about the Estate.                                              |\n| 8        | against the future income --                                      | 8        | A.<br>If the Estate has tax                                                     |\n| 9        | THE COURT REPORTER: The                                           | 9        | transactions, as I said, I would recommend                                      |\n| 10       | previous administrative --                                        | 10       | the Estate files tax returns on a timely                                        |\n| 11       | THE WITNESS: N-O -- net                                           | 11       | basis and it would include whatever                                             |\n| 12       | operating losses against a future                                 | 12       | transactional activity that is allowed                                          |\n| 13       | receipt, which is another reason to                               | 13       | under the -- both the bankruptcy code and                                       |\n| 14       | file the return.                                                  | 14       | the internal revenue code and I don't know                                      |\n| 15       | Q.<br>Is it fair to say that the work                             | 15       | what that's going to be.                                                        |\n| 16       | that Verdolino and Lowey anticipates                              | 16       | Q.<br>Turning to the next line item,                                            |\n| 17       | potentially doing in connection with tax                          | 17       | it reads, \"assistance with reviewing                                            |\n| 18       | returns depends on whether cash is coming                         | 18       | reconciling, analyzing and if necessary,                                        |\n| 19       | into the debtor or the Estate in the                              | 19       | objecting to proofs of claim\". What work                                        |\n| 20       | future?                                                           | 20       | has Verdolino and Lowey performed in                                            |\n| 21       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                     | 21       | connection with this line item?                                                 |\n| 22       | A.<br>No. You're going to have --                                 | 22       | A.<br>None.                                                                     |\n| 23       | you're going to have accrued expenses                             | 23       | Q.<br>Just generally, what does --                                              |\n| 24       | depending on the -- when the timing of the                        | 24       | what is a proof of claim?                                                       |\n| 25       | case and everything, accrued expenses can                         | 25       | A.<br>It's a form. There's a form.                                              |\n|          | Page 78                                                           |          | Page 80                                                                         |\n|          |                                                                   |          |                                                                                 |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                        | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                      |\n| 2        | be deductible. So cash -- clearly, if                             | 2        | There's a bankruptcy form that's a proof of                                     |\n| 3        | there were cash, that would -- that would                         | 3        | claim. I don't remember what the form                                           |\n| 4        | have to be taken care of but depending on                         | 4        | number is but it's an opportunity for any                                       |\n| 5        | how this case goes and the timing, it's                           | 5        | alleged creditor to file a claim in either                                      |\n| 6        | entirely possible that some of the accrued                        | 6        | a Chapter 11 or a Chapter 7 case. They can                                      |\n| 7        | expenses would be deductible.                                     | 7        | file claims on a secured basis, a priority                                      |\n| 8        | Q.<br>Have you seen the debtor's most                             | 8        | basis, an administrative basis and I'm sure                                     |\n| 9        | recent tax returns?                                               | 9        | there's more that I'm missing. I don't                                          |\n| 10       | A.<br>I don't know that I would be                                | 10       | think there's a claims objection deadline                                       |\n| 11       | able to call them most recent tax returns                         | 11       | but at some point in time, in a Chapter 11,                                     |\n| 12       | but I've seen parts. I don't know if it's                         | 12       | there's usually a claims objection                                              |\n| 13       | the whole thing. I don't know if I saw the                        | 13       | deadline. If, however, a creditor has been                                      |\n| 14       | entire federal and the entire state but I                         | 14       | scheduled on Schedule D, E or F and that                                        |\n| 15       | -- I at least saw the New York return and                         | 15       | number happens to be right, then the                                            |\n| 16       | the federal version attached to the New                           | 16       | creditor does not have to file a claim as I                                     |\n| 17       | York return which may or may not be the                           | 17       | understand it. If they disagree because                                         |\n| 18       | entire federal return for 2019 I think and                        | 18       | it's owed more or less -- and rarely do                                         |\n| 19       | 2020.                                                             | 19       | they disagree if they're owed less but if                                       |\n| 20       | Q.<br>If the debtor's income is zero,                             | 20       | they're owed more, they're allowed to file                                      |\n| 21       | what do you anticipate deducting from?                            | 21       | a proof of claim and establish what they                                        |\n| 22       | MR. AULET: Objection.                                             | 22       | think the amount due to them from the                                           |\n| 23       | A.<br>Are we talking about the debtor                             | 23       | bankruptcy estate would be.                                                     |\n| 24<br>25 | individually or the Estate?<br>Q.<br>Let's start with the debtor. | 24<br>25 | Q.<br>Have you reviewed any of the<br>pending litigation claims in this matter? |\n\n21 (Pages 78 - 81)\n\n<span id=\"page-22-0\"></span>\n\n|    | 85                                                    |    |                                                           |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                            | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                |\n| 2  | A.<br>No.                                             | 2  | someone to do work on a preference                        |\n| 3  | Q.<br>What experience does Verdolino                  | 3  | analysis. We certainly participated in                    |\n| 4  | and Lowey have in analyzing the likelihood            | 4  | preparing that because we filed them.                     |\n| 5  | of success in pending litigation claims?              | 5  | Q.<br>Do you know how many                                |\n| 6  | A.<br>Absolutely none.                                | 6  | pre-petition payments were disclosed in                   |\n| 7  | Q.<br>Turning to the next line item,                  | 7  | this case?                                                |\n| 8  | \"assistance with reviewing debtor books and           | 8  | A.<br>No.                                                 |\n| 9  | records for possible avoidable transactions           | 9  | Q.<br>Does 21 sound about right?                          |\n| 10 | such as preference and fraudulent transfer            | 10 | A.<br>I don't know.                                       |\n| 11 | claims\". Do you see that?                             | 11 | Q.<br>So the line item refers to                          |\n| 12 | A.<br>Yes.                                            | 12 | debtor books and records for possible                     |\n| 13 | Q.<br>Can you explain to me,                          | 13 | avoidable transactions. Have you reviewed                 |\n| 14 | generally, what this means?                           | 14 | any debtor books and records in connection                |\n| 15 | A.<br>The bankruptcy code allows a                    | 15 | with this engagement?                                     |\n| 16 | look back period. For preferences, it                 | 16 | A.<br>No.                                                 |\n| 17 | allows 90 days prior to the filing for                | 17 | Q.<br>Has Verdolino and Lowey                             |\n| 18 | preference claims and I'll let lawyers                | 18 | reviewed any books and records in                         |\n| 19 | define what that is and insiders and other            | 19 | connection with this engagement?                          |\n| 20 | fraudulent transfers take place between               | 20 | A.<br>No.                                                 |\n| 21 | zero days and I've heard it's -- whatever             | 21 | Q.<br>Is it fair to say that                              |\n| 22 | the statute happens to be for whatever the            | 22 | Verdolino and Lowey relies on the                         |\n| 23 | issue might be, one year, two years, four             | 23 | assistance of other parties in connection                 |\n| 24 | years, whatever the case maybe but it's a             | 24 | with this line item?                                      |\n| 25 | search through transactions to see if any             | 25 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                             |\n|    | Page 82                                               |    | Page 84                                                   |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                            | 1  | C. JALBERT                                                |\n| 2  | of them might be avoidable and recoverable            | 2  | A.<br>Are you talking about past                          |\n| 3  | to the Estate.                                        | 3  | tense or future tense?                                    |\n| 4  | Q.<br>What analysis has Verdolino and                 | 4  | Q.<br>Past tense.                                         |\n| 5  | Lowey performed in connection with this               | 5  | A.<br>We relied on other individuals                      |\n| 6  | line item?                                            | 6  | for everything that we did from an                        |\n| 7  | MR. AULET: I would caution the                        | 7  | information perspective.                                  |\n| 8  | Witness to the extent that there is                   | 8  | MR. AULET: We've been going                               |\n| 9  | anything, not to disclose any                         | 9  | for awhile so if you need a break --                      |\n| 10 | specifics.                                            | 10 | THE WITNESS: No, let's get the                            |\n| 11 | MS. ARONSSON: Sorry, what do                          | 11 | -- let's do it all at once. I would                       |\n| 12 | you mean?                                             | 12 | like to get out of here before                            |\n| 13 | MR. AULET: That if he has done                        | 13 | tonight.                                                  |\n| 14 | any work, it would be covered by the                  | 14 | MR. GOLDMAN: We are going to                              |\n| 15 | work/product privilege. Not to                        | 15 | break at 12.                                              |\n| 16 | disclose those specifics.                             | 16 | MR. HARBACH: Yes, sir.                                    |\n| 17 | Q.<br>Setting aside the work/product                  | 17 | Q.<br>Okay, turning to the next line                      |\n| 18 | protection that Brown Rudnick is alleging             | 18 | item, \"assistance with any necessary                      |\n| 19 | in connection with this line item, can you            | 19 | litigation support\". I think we covered                   |\n| 20 | answer the question?                                  | 20 | this previously. Do you have anything to                  |\n| 21 | A.<br>Well, one of the questions in                   | 21 | add about potential services in connection                |\n| 22 | the SOFA's is payments made in the 90 days            | 22 | with this line item that we haven't already<br>discussed? |\n| 23 |                                                       |    |                                                           |\n|    | prior to bankruptcy. I don't know if                  | 23 |                                                           |\n| 24 | that's necessarily a surprise to anybody              | 24 | A.<br>Not that I can remember.                            |\n| 25 | but that is usually the starting place for<br>Page 83 | 25 | Q.<br>Has Verdolino and Lowey done<br>Page 85             |\n\n22 (Pages 82 - 85)\n\n<span id=\"page-23-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                            | 1  | C. JALBERT                                    |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------|----|-----------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | any work in connection with this line item            | 2  | assets is on liquidated litigation claims?    |\n| 3  | to this date?                                         | 3  | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                 |\n| 4  | A.<br>In this case, no.                               | 4  | A.<br>If we did, it would be awfully          |\n| 5  | Q.<br>The next -- turning to the next                 | 5  | small.                                        |\n| 6  | line item is \"assistance with plan                    | 6  | Q.<br>Understood. Are you aware of            |\n| 7  | development and preparation including                 | 7  | any draft plans currently being circulated?   |\n| 8  | feasibility\". What does this mean?                    | 8  | MR. AULET: Objection. He's                    |\n| 9  | A.<br>Well, in order to have a                        | 9  | already testified that he hasn't              |\n| 10 | successful Chapter 11, you have to confirm            | 10 | performed any work on this. So I              |\n| 11 | a plan of reorganization or whatever the              | 11 | don't see what the relevance is to            |\n| 12 | title will be when it's prepared and                  | 12 | V&L's retention.                              |\n| 13 | created. It might even be a joint plan for            | 13 | MS. ARONSSON: Sure. I'm                       |\n| 14 | all I know. In those plans, there                     | 14 | curious though about ongoing work in          |\n| 15 | typically is some budgeting because                   | 15 | connection with this line item.               |\n| 16 | sometimes payments to creditors are paid              | 16 | MR. AULET: He can answer if                   |\n| 17 | out over time. We might assist in                     | 17 | he's doing any current work with it.          |\n| 18 | preparing the cash flow projections of                | 18 | A.<br>None.                                   |\n| 19 | receipts and disbursements for some future            | 19 | Q.<br>Turning to -- turning to the            |\n| 20 | time period and my -- I'm not a lawyer but            | 20 | next line item on the next page, it reads,    |\n| 21 | as I understand it, in order to confirm a             | 21 | \"general consulting and assistance with any   |\n| 22 | Chapter 11, you must prove that the                   | 22 | other matters and tasks that may arise and    |\n| 23 | creditors are getting a better return from            | 23 | as may be directed by you or the debtor\".     |\n| 24 | the Chapter 11 plan than they would have in           | 24 | Is it fair to say this is kind of a           |\n| 25 | a Chapter 7 case and that usually requires            | 25 | catch-all?                                    |\n|    | Page 86                                               |    | Page 88                                       |\n|    |                                                       |    |                                               |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                            | 1  | C. JALBERT                                    |\n| 2  | that you -- well, you're going to have                | 2  | A.<br>Yes. It's a catch-all with the          |\n| 3  | feasibility and you're going to have --               | 3  | caveat -- this is not my first rodeo -- if,   |\n| 4  | what's the other one -- term is slipping my           | 4  | for some reason, there's a discreet task      |\n| 5  | mind -- I can't remember it but it didn't             | 5  | that is going to be required that will be     |\n| 6  | list it anyway's.                                     | 6  | comprehensive and costly, we would file a     |\n| 7  | Q.<br>The line item says feasibility                  | 7  | motion to amend our employment, what would    |\n| 8  | and I think you mentioned that as well.               | 8  | be covered by the employment but as to --     |\n| 9  | What does feasibility mean?                           | 9  | you know, for instance, sometimes they get    |\n| 10 | A.<br>You -- the projections is                       | 10 | a notice from the IRS that requires 15        |\n| 11 | usually the evidence with which to allow              | 11 | minutes for someone to respond to. I know     |\n| 12 | the Court and other parties in interest to            | 12 | little -- little cats and dogs that happen    |\n| 13 | determine what the future cash flows will             | 13 | that don't happen to fit into something       |\n| 14 | be and make their own decision based on               | 14 | else, it's a catch-all for the minutiae.      |\n| 15 | that as to whether the debtor's plan is               | 15 | Not intended to be a catch-all for major      |\n| 16 | financially feasible and the Judge                    | 16 | line items and that's only to protect me.     |\n| 17 | obviously has the final determination but             | 17 | Q.<br>Understood. What work or                |\n| 18 | usually everyone puts their two cents in.             | 18 | analysis has Verdolino performed in           |\n| 19 | Q.<br>What analysis has Verdolino and                 | 19 | connection with this line item, if any?       |\n| 20 | Lowey done to date in connection with this            | 20 | A.<br>None that I know of.                    |\n| 21 | line item?                                            | 21 | Q.<br>Are you familiar with a company         |\n| 22 | A.<br>None.                                           | 22 | called Stretto?                               |\n| 23 | Q.<br>Would Verdolino and Lowey have                  | 23 | A.<br>Yes.                                    |\n| 24 | a function in developing a plan if the                | 24 | Q.<br>What do they do?                        |\n| 25 | debtor's estate's only source of income or<br>Page 87 | 25 | A.<br>I don't know everything that<br>Page 89 |\n\n23 (Pages 86 - 89)\n\n<span id=\"page-24-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                 |          |                                                                       |\n|----------|----------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                         | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                            |\n| 2        | they do but they do claims agent work and          | 2        | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                         |\n| 3        | other bankruptcy-related work. I don't             | 3        | A.<br>Yes.                                                            |\n| 4        | know what their list of services are. I've         | 4        | Q.<br>You mentioned before that you                                   |\n| 5        | hired them myself in cases. I think                | 5        | have worked with Stretto in the past?                                 |\n| 6        | they're still working for me on a case or          | 6        | A.<br>Well, they're in the same --                                    |\n| 7        | two right now in a limited basis.                  | 7        | some of the same -- well, a couple. One or                            |\n| 8        | Q.<br>Are you aware that Stretto was               | 8        | two of the same cases that we're in.                                  |\n| 9        | involved in this matter?                           | 9        | Q.<br>Do you have an understanding as                                 |\n| 10       | A.<br>I'm aware that there's a motion              | 10       | to whether Stretto could open and maintain                            |\n| 11       | to employ them, yes.                               | 11       | a DIP account?                                                        |\n| 12       | Q.<br>Generally, what is your                      | 12       | A.<br>No.                                                             |\n| 13       | understanding of the scope of work that            | 13       | Q.<br>Do you have an understanding                                    |\n| 14       | Stretto would potentially be employed to           | 14       | about whether Stretto could monitor                                   |\n| 15       | do?                                                | 15       | disbursements in connection with a DIP                                |\n| 16       | A.<br>I have not read their motion to              | 16       | account?                                                              |\n| 17       | employ. No idea what their --                      | 17       | A.<br>No.                                                             |\n| 18       | MS. ARONSSON: Let's go off the                     | 18       | Q.<br>Turning to the books and                                        |\n| 19       | record. Thank you.                                 | 19       | records line item, the seventh bullet                                 |\n| 20       | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                      | 20       | point, I'm going to ask you to assume that                            |\n| 21       | 11:53 a.m. and we are off the record.              | 21       | there are 21 professional service providers                           |\n| 22       | (Whereupon, a brief recess was                     | 22       | who have received a pre-petition payment in                           |\n| 23       | taken.)                                            | 23       | the 90 days before filing. I'm also going                             |\n| 24       | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time                         | 24       | to ask you to assume that Stretto can                                 |\n| 25       | period is 12:22 p.m. We're back on                 | 25       | provide analysis with respect to those                                |\n|          | Page 90                                            |          | Page 92                                                               |\n|          |                                                    |          |                                                                       |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                         | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                            |\n| 2        | the record.                                        | 2        | payments. Why is it necessary for                                     |\n| 3        | Q.<br>Just wrapping up the questions               | 3        | Verdolino and Lowey to perform these                                  |\n| 4        | related to Exhibit 4. Turning back to the          | 4        | duties?                                                               |\n| 5        | line item about opening and maintaining the        | 5        | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                         |\n| 6        | DIP account, would you agree that a bank or        | 6        | It calls for speculation.                                             |\n| 7        | an escrow agent could open and maintain a          | 7        | A.<br>Most everybody that has half a                                  |\n| 8        | DIP account?                                       | 8        | brain can do that. It's not going to be                               |\n| 9        | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                      | 9        | done by me.                                                           |\n| 10       | A.<br>I don't have any knowledge of                | 10       | MS. ARONSSON: The Court                                               |\n| 11       | why they couldn't but I'm certainly not an         | 11       | Reporter is going to hand you what is                                 |\n| 12       | expert.                                            | 12       | being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 5.                                    |\n| 13       | Q.<br>What about monitoring                        | 13       | (Whereupon, Official Form                                             |\n| 14       | disbursements and effectuating                     | 14       | 106Sum was marked as Jalbert Exhibit                                  |\n| 15       | disbursements?                                     | 15       | 5 for identification as of this date                                  |\n| 16       | A.<br>The bank doing it?                           | 16       | by the Reporter.)                                                     |\n| 17<br>18 | Q.<br>Yes.<br>A.<br>I don't think the bank's going | 17<br>18 | MS. ARONSSON: I'll say for the<br>record, this is a document that has |\n| 19       | to do it.                                          | 19       | been filed as Docket Number 78 in                                     |\n| 20       | Q.<br>Or an escrow agent.                          | 20       | this case.                                                            |\n| 21       | A.<br>An escrow agent would have more              | 21       | Q.<br>Do you recognize this document,                                 |\n| 22       | obligation, whatever the escrow agreement          | 22       | Mr. Jalbert?                                                          |\n| 23       | says. I don't --                                   | 23       | A.<br>Yes.                                                            |\n| 24       | Q.<br>But an escrow agent could be                 | 24       | Q.<br>What is it?                                                     |\n| 25       | employed to perform those duties?<br>Page 91       | 25       | A.<br>The first page is the official<br>Page 93                       |\n\n24 (Pages 90 - 93)\n\n<span id=\"page-25-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                       |          |                                                       |\n|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                            |\n| 2        | form 106Sum which is the summary of assets               | 2        | Q.<br>Item 58 refers to Line 36?                      |\n| 3        | and liabilities and certain statistical                  | 3        | A.<br>Okay.                                           |\n| 4        | information for the debtor, Ho Wan Kwok.                 | 4        | Q.<br>So 36, just up the page, the                    |\n| 5        | Q.<br>I think we've discussed earlier                    | 5        | total amount here is 3,850 dollars. Do you            |\n| 6        | that Verdolino and Lowey had a role in                   | 6        | see that?                                             |\n| 7        | preparing the SOFA and schedule. Is that                 | 7        | A.<br>Yes.                                            |\n| 8        | right?                                                   | 8        | Q.<br>So 36 wraps up into one number.                 |\n| 9        | A.<br>Yes.                                               | 9        | Part 4 of this filing, is that fair?                  |\n| 10       | Q.<br>Verdolino and Lowey had a role                     | 10       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                         |\n| 11       | in preparing this document?                              | 11       | A.<br>Well, when you mean this                        |\n| 12       | A.<br>Yes.                                               | 12       | filing, are you talking about Part 4 of               |\n| 13       | Q.<br>I just want to walk through                        | 13       | Schedule A/B.                                         |\n| 14       | this at a high level. The first line item                | 14       | Q.<br>I am, yes. Thank you for the                    |\n| 15       | is -- item one relates to property. What                 | 15       | clarification.                                        |\n| 16       | does this line item include?                             | 16       | A.<br>I would agree that Line 36 is                   |\n| 17       | A.<br>What specific -- A, B or C or                      | 17       | the sum of Part 4 which starts at question            |\n| 18       | all of them?                                             | 18       | 16.                                                   |\n| 19       | Q.<br>Sorry, fair question. 1A.                          | 19       | Q.<br>What analysis, if any, did                      |\n| 20       | A.<br>Well, it reads \"Schedule A/B                       | 20       | Verdolino and Lowey perform in connection             |\n| 21       | Property official form 106A/B\", question or              | 21       | with these line items?                                |\n| 22       | 1A, \"copy Line 55. Total real estate from                | 22       | A.<br>Whatever we did, we did working                 |\n| 23       | schedule A/B\".                                           | 23       | with the lawyers.                                     |\n| 24       | Q.<br>Thank you. And it reads zero?                      | 24       | Q.<br>I'm going to ask you to turn to                 |\n| 25       | A.<br>Correct.                                           | 25       | Page 3 of the document.                               |\n|          | Page 94                                                  |          | Page 96                                               |\n|          |                                                          |          |                                                       |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                            |\n| 2        | Q.<br>What analysis, if any, did                         | 2        | MR. AULET: Just for                                   |\n| 3        | Verdolino and Lowey do to prepare this line              | 3        | clarification, every time you're                      |\n| 4        | item?                                                    | 4        | refer to Page 3, you're referring to                  |\n| 5        | A.<br>I worked with the lawyers.                         | 5        | the top numbers?                                      |\n| 6        | Q.<br>Did you do any independent                         | 6        | MS. ARONSSON: Yes. I'm                                |\n| 7        | investigation with respect to the line item              | 7        | referring to the docket numbering at                  |\n| 8        | 1A?                                                      | 8        | the top. Page 3 of 23.                                |\n| 9        | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                            | 9        | Q.<br>Starting with Part 1 here, did                  |\n| 10       | A.<br>No.                                                | 10       | Verdolino and Lowey perform any work in               |\n| 11       | Q.<br>Turning to 1B, this reads,                         | 11       | connection with this line item?                       |\n| 12       | \"total personal property from Schedule A/B\"              | 12       | A.<br>If we did, we did with counsel.                 |\n| 13       | and I think this refers us to Line 36?                   | 13       | Q.<br>In Part 2, Item 3 and 4                         |\n| 14       | A.<br>I would have thought it related                    | 14       | referring to cars, vans, trucks, etcetera,            |\n| 15       | to Line 62.                                              | 15       | watercraft, aircraft, did Verdolino and               |\n| 16       | Q.<br>It does and then 62. Sorry --                      | 16       | Lowey perform any work in connection with             |\n| 17       | so 62 refers back to 56 to 61. Do you see                | 17       | this section?                                         |\n| 18       | that, that's on Page 7 of the PDF?                       | 18       | A.<br>All with counsel.                               |\n| 19       | A.<br>Lines 56 to 61, is that what                       | 19       | Q.<br>So it's fair to say, when you                   |\n| 20       | you're referring to?                                     | 20       | say you performed work with counsel, you              |\n| 21       | Q.<br>That's right.                                      | 21       | didn't perform any independent                        |\n| 22       | A.<br>Yep.                                               | 22       | investigation?                                        |\n| 23<br>24 | Q.<br>The only item populated in 55<br>to 61 is Item 58? | 23<br>24 | A.<br>Correct.<br>Q.<br>Part 3, Items 6 through Items |\n| 25       | A.<br>Correct.                                           | 25       | 15 refer to personal and household items,             |\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n25 (Pages 94 - 97)\n\n85\n\n<span id=\"page-26-0\"></span>\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                    | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                    |\n|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2        | is that right?                                                                | 2        | EXAMINATION BY                                                |\n| 3        | A.<br>Yes.                                                                    | 3        | MR. HARBACH:                                                  |\n| 4        | Q.<br>Without walking through each of                                         | 4        | Q.<br>For the record, this is David                           |\n| 5        | these, did you perform -- did Verdolino and                                   | 5        | Harbach at O'Melveny, also representing                       |\n| 6        | Lowey perform any work in connection with                                     | 6        | Pax. I just have a few questions. Sir, I                      |\n| 7        | Items 6 through 14?                                                           | 7        | believe you mentioned earlier that you or                     |\n| 8        | A.<br>Nothing -- not with the                                                 | 8        | Verdolino and Lowey were involved in                          |\n| 9        | attorneys.                                                                    | 9        | helping to prepare the notes for the                          |\n| 10       | Q.<br>Just to be clear about your                                             | 10       | schedules that were filed? Have I got that                    |\n| 11       | role, were you provided information from                                      | 11       | right?                                                        |\n| 12       | counsel and you were responsible for                                          | 12       | A.<br>The specific part of the                                |\n| 13       | drafting this form or did you rely on                                         | 13       | notes --                                                      |\n| 14       | counsel to draft this form?                                                   | 14       | Q.<br>Yes, sir. The specific notes.                           |\n| 15       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                                 | 15       | A.<br>Not the general --                                      |\n| 16       | A.<br>We keypunched into the forms                                            | 16       | Q.<br>Understood.                                             |\n| 17       | after consultation obviously.                                                 | 17       | A.<br>Yes, I worked with counsel on                           |\n| 18       | Q.<br>Did you do anything besides                                             | 18       | that.                                                         |\n| 19       | keypunch into the form?                                                       | 19       | Q.<br>The specific notes are --                               |\n| 20       | A.<br>We discussed matters with the                                           | 20       | appear at Document Number 77 on the docket                    |\n| 21       | attorneys.                                                                    | 21       | and I don't have an extra copy for you but                    |\n| 22       | Q.<br>I'm asking in connection with                                           | 22       | I hope you'll agree that it won't be                          |\n| 23       | filing the schedule and the SOFA, when you                                    | 23       | necessary. When it comes to questions                         |\n| 24       | say you communicated with the attorneys,                                      | 24       | about things like electronics and household                   |\n| 25       | you're talking about Brown Rudnick?                                           | 25       | goods and furnishings, which my colleague                     |\n|          | Page 98                                                                       |          | Page 100                                                      |\n|          |                                                                               |          |                                                               |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                    | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                    |\n| 2        | A.<br>And Melissa Francis and Aaron                                           | 2        | was just asking you about, the specific                       |\n| 3        | Mitchell.                                                                     | 3        | notes state, for example, \"numerous items                     |\n| 4        | Q.<br>Did you communicate or did                                              | 4        | fitting the personal and household                            |\n| 5        | Verdolino and Lowey communicate with anyone                                   | 5        | definition are located at the residence and                   |\n| 6        | else besides the attorneys at Brown                                           | 6        | the apartment\" and then it goes onto say,                     |\n| 7        | Rudnick, Melissa Francis and Aaron                                            | 7        | \"except as otherwise set forth herein, the                    |\n| 8        | Mitchell?                                                                     | 8        | debtor has no legal title to the contents                     |\n| 9        | A.<br>No.                                                                     | 9        | of either the residence or the apartment                      |\n| 10       | Q.<br>Were you provided any facts or                                          | 10       | and no court has made any determination                       |\n| 11       | information from any party when punching in                                   | 11       | that the debtor has any other interests in                    |\n| 12       | these line items?                                                             | 12       | any such items\". My question for you is                       |\n| 13       | A.<br>We were informed by facts, lots                                         | 13       | was Verdolino and Lowey at all involved in                    |\n| 14       | of them from the attorneys and lots of                                        | 14       | making the assessment of whether any of                       |\n| 15       | discussion.                                                                   | 15       | these household items belonged to the                         |\n| 16       | Q.<br>Was it -- scratch that. The                                             | 16       | debtor?                                                       |\n| 17<br>18 | information you received, was it oral?<br>A.<br>Some was oral and some was in | 17<br>18 | MR. AULET: I just lodge an<br>objection to asking him about a |\n| 19       | e-mails, I believe, from counsel.                                             | 19       | document that you're not showing him.                         |\n| 20       | MR. HARBACH: Do you mind if I                                                 | 20       | You can answer if you can.                                    |\n| 21       | ask a couple questions?                                                       | 21       | A.<br>To be clear, are you asking me                          |\n| 22       | MS. ARONSSON: Sure.                                                           | 22       | if I investigated whether the spatulas and                    |\n| 23       | MR. AULET: I don't have any                                                   | 23       | the pots and pans existed and who bought                      |\n| 24       | objection.                                                                    | 24       | them and how much they were and are they at                   |\n| 25       | MR. HARBACH: Thank you.<br>Page 99                                            | 25       | the house?<br>Page 101                                        |\n\n26 (Pages 98 - 101)\n\n<span id=\"page-27-0\"></span>Page 102 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. All I'm asking is whether Verdolino and Lowey had any role in making the judgment call over whether the household items at the residence or the apartment belonged to Mr. Kwok or was that something that was left to the lawyers? 8 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 9 A. We did no investigation. I had no personal knowledge not told to me by Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Brown Rudnick about the ownership of those. So it wasn't my decision and I didn't investigate but I certainly was party to the conversations regarding that. 16 Q. During those conversations, if one of those people, a lawyer at Brown Rudnick or Melissa -- whose last name I forget -- 20 A. Francis. 21 Q. Francis, thank you. Represented to you that those items do not belong to Mr. Kwok, you just accepted that at face value? 25 A. Correct. Page 103 1 C. JALBERT 2 MR. HARBACH: Okay, thank you. 3 Thank you, Laura. CONTINUED EXAMINATION BY MS. ARONSSON: 6 Q. This is Laura Aronsson from O'Melveny. Just turning back to what we were talking about in connection with the schedule. I think David covered this. So when drafting this, how did you decide whether an item like the iPhone referenced in Line Item 7 or the clothes referenced in Line Item 11 or the family dog referenced Item 13 belonged to Kwok as opposed to another person or entity? 16 A. I was informed by either Melissa Francis or Aaron Mitchell or they informed Brown Rudnick and Brown Rudnick informed us. 20 Q. Is it fair to say that that chain of events that you just described applies to all of the items identified in this schedule? 24 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 25 A. I don't know -- we better go Page 104 1 C. JALBERT item by item if that's what you want to do. I don't know what you're referring to. You know, you got specific lines you're talking about? 6 Q. Sure, that's fair. So in connection with any of the assets identified in the schedule as belonging to Mr. Kwok, you solely relied on the chain of events you previously described, Brown Rudnick received information from Melissa Francis and Aaron Mitchell? 13 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 14 A. No, that's not what I said. I said we heard directly from Melissa Francis or Aaron Mitchell or they informed Brown Rudnick and Brown Rudnick told me that they -- what the answer was from them. There was no one way of communicating. It was fluid situation. We had a very short time to do them but it was not one way or the other. It was, as I said, either and many times the e-mails were with all the attorneys on the e-mail or it was a phone call with a lot of parties and I don't Page 105 1 C. JALBERT remember all of the parties but the source of the information was for us, first, Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis in no particular order. Now I don't remember who knew more about what than the other or if they passed information onto Brown Rudnick, who then passed it onto us. Obviously, after they did whatever legal analysis they wanted to do. 11 Q. In preparing these documents, did you ask for any information from Brown Rudnick or Aaron Mitchell or Melissa Francis that you were not given? 15 A. I don't remember asking a question they didn't answer but I didn't investigate anything. 18 Q. I want to turn to Page 16 of this document. So at the bottom of the page, to direct your attention there, Part 2 reads, \"estimate your ongoing monthly expenses\". Were you involved in drafting this section? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. What was your role -- or\n\n27 (Pages 102 - 105)\n\n<span id=\"page-28-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                     | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n|----|------------------------------------------------|----|---------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | scratch that. What was Verdolino and           | 2  | operating report is a different report and  |\n| 3  | Lowey's role in connection with this           | 3  | that's a completely different question than |\n| 4  | section?                                       | 4  | what's on here.                             |\n| 5  | A.<br>We had discussions with the              | 5  | Q.<br>Can you explain to me the             |\n| 6  | legal team, which is Brown Rudnick team        | 6  | difference?                                 |\n| 7  | plus Aaron Mitchell, plus Melissa Francis,     | 7  | A.<br>And I don't remember what             |\n| 8  | probably more than one time, probably          | 8  | question it is, is it like 4 or 5 or 6E or  |\n| 9  | orally, probably in e-mail and it was a        | 9  | whatever it is, the request is to report    |\n| 10 | discussion.                                    | 10 | the expenses paid by others on the debtor's |\n| 11 | Q.<br>Turning to the next page, the            | 11 | behalf. That's not what this asks. So in    |\n| 12 | estimated monthly operating expenses reads     | 12 | the schedule, we listed some funds and we   |\n| 13 | zero. Is that fair?                            | 13 | will, going forward, be listing and         |\n| 14 | A.<br>Yes.                                     | 14 | reporting, as required by the MOR, the      |\n| 15 | Q.<br>Did you anticipate the debtor's          | 15 | expenses paid by others on behalf of the    |\n| 16 | monthly operating expenses to remain zero      | 16 | debtor which is again different from what   |\n| 17 | after this point?                              | 17 | this asks.                                  |\n| 18 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                  | 18 | Q.<br>Focusing on what this asks,           |\n| 19 | A.<br>It certainly was discussed with          | 19 | it's your understanding that the debtor's   |\n| 20 | the attorneys. I don't think it's a            | 20 | ongoing monthly expenses is zero?           |\n| 21 | secret. There was lots of discussion           | 21 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.               |\n| 22 | yesterday. So my expectation is yes, as to     | 22 | A.<br>The debtor's payment of the           |\n| 23 | his expenses, his payment of his expenses      | 23 | ongoing expenses is zero.                   |\n| 24 | is going to remain I think zero.               | 24 | Q.<br>You did no investigation into         |\n| 25 | Q.<br>I think you said his -- his              | 25 | whether that is correct?                    |\n|    |                                                |    | Page 108                                    |\n|    | Page 106                                       |    |                                             |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                     | 1  | C. JALBERT                                  |\n| 2  | expenses. In your view, what does his          | 2  | A.<br>Correct.                              |\n| 3  | expenses cover?                                | 3  | Q.<br>Turning just to the Excel             |\n| 4  | A.<br>There's a whole list of them             | 4  | sheets at the end of this document,         |\n| 5  | here. You want to go down them? It looks       | 5  | starting just broadly, was Verdolino and    |\n| 6  | like about 30 of them. Real estate taxes,      | 6  | Lowey involved in preparing these           |\n| 7  | property and homeowners and renters'           | 7  | documents?                                  |\n| 8  | insurance, home maintenance repair and         | 8  | A.<br>Well, we were certainly               |\n| 9  | upkeep expenses, home ownership association    | 9  | involved with others, yes.                  |\n| 10 | and condo dues. Don't even know if those       | 10 | Q.<br>What -- generally, what work          |\n| 11 | are applicable. Electricity, heat and          | 11 | did Verdolino and Lowey do in connection    |\n| 12 | natural gas. Want me to keep going?            | 12 | with these documents?                       |\n| 13 | Q.<br>So we can just agree that Items          | 13 | A.<br>Reviewed them for                     |\n| 14 | 4 through 21 would include monthly             | 14 | reasonableness, assisted in putting them in |\n| 15 | expenses?                                      | 15 | a form that would normally be seen in a     |\n| 16 | A.<br>Again, as it relates to him              | 16 | SOFA and schedule. I think some of this     |\n| 17 | paying them, I would agree. My                 | 17 | was uploaded into the actual Schedule F     |\n| 18 | understanding is they're going to remain       | 18 | because I think Schedule F -- well, maybe   |\n| 19 | zero.                                          | 19 | it doesn't. I don't know. I don't           |\n| 20 | Q.<br>So this -- the analysis                  | 20 | remember whether this was uploaded or not   |\n| 21 | contained in this document is separate from    | 21 | but it could be. So that -- so it starts    |\n| 22 | the monthly operating report, the reports      | 22 | with D. So all of these, we worked with     |\n| 23 | that you, Verdolino, draft in connection       | 23 | the attorneys and that's again, all three,  |\n| 24 | with this case?                                | 24 | the Brown Rudnick team, Aaron Mitchell and  |\n| 25 | A.<br>Correct, because the monthly<br>Page 107 | 25 | Melissa Francis.<br>Page 109                |\n\n28 (Pages 106 - 109)\n\n<span id=\"page-29-0\"></span>Page 110 1 C. JALBERT 2 Q. I think you said the phrase reviewed for reasonableness. What do you mean by that? 5 A. Well, if we had anything to compare information to, we compared it or -- or if we had a question, we asked a question of the lawyers. I don't remember off hand what those were. 10 Q. Can you think generally of any issues that you investigated in connection with preparing these? 13 A. I'm sure on a couple of them, we wanted the make sure that -- that there wasn't a missing digit or an extra digit so I'm sure someone from my team walked through with someone, probably either Melissa or Aaron, just as a double check that it's what -- what the number on the form was the number that they intended. There wasn't, in there someplace, a human error. 23 Q. Can you think of anything else specific that you investigated? 25 A. We did not investigate. Page 111 1 C. JALBERT 2 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 3 Reporter is going to hand you what's 4 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 6. 5 This is a document filed in this case 6 as Docket 77. 7 (Whereupon, Global Notes was 8 marked as Jalbert Exhibit 6 for 9 identification as of this date by the 10 Reporter.) 11 Q. Do you recognize this document? 12 A. Yes. 13 Q. What is it? 14 A. The Global Notes and Statements of Limitations Methodology and Disclaimers Regarding the Debtor's Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs and the debtor is Ho Wan Kwok. 19 Q. And this is a specific line item that Verdolino and Lowey's proposed retention relates to? 22 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 23 A. Can I go back and take a look? I don't know what the global notes are listed or not but these are part and parcel Page 112 1 C. JALBERT to the SOFA's and schedules. So it would be part of the first bullet, \"assistance with preparation of the statement of financial affairs and schedules and all support thereto and any amendments, if necessary\". 8 Q. What was Verdolino and Lowey's role in preparing this document? 10 A. Well, we certainly assisted in drafting. We assisted in reviewing, particularly the specific notes but there was -- there was a lot of back and forth and a lot of work between the Brown Rudnick law firm, Aaron Mitchell, Melissa Francis and Verdolino and Lowey, both -- all three at Verdolino and Lowey, Matt Flynn, Mary Jo Schindler and myself. 19 Q. Just to understand, what specific work did Verdolino and Lowey do in connection with preparing this document? 22 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 23 A. Well, like I said, we had numerous e-mails, we reviewed everything, we made comments. We might have drafted a Page 113 1 C. JALBERT paragraph here or a paragraph there. I think we assisted the group in making sure the references, amongst the notes and amongst the questions and the SOFA's and amongst the schedules to the extent they were interrelated, that the references were appropriate. We made sure that the writings were the facts as we knew them. Didn't investigate but we had lots of discussions and we made sure that what was represented here was our memories. 13 Q. Thank you. Turning to Page 4, Question 1 in the middle of the page, asks \"do you own or have any legal or equitable interest in any residence, building, land or similar property\". The answer in Item 1, below it, reads, \"the debtor has use and occupancy of real estate located at 373 Taconic Road, Greenwich, Connecticut\". Do you have any understanding as to why the use and occupancy of certain real estate is relevant to this filing? 24 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 25 A. Well, I'm not a lawyer but\n\n29 (Pages 110 - 113)\n\n<span id=\"page-30-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                                       |          |                                                                                     |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |\n| 2        | Schedule A is I thought real property that                                               | 2        | Haven on Wednesday for the 341 meeting but                                          |\n| 3        | was owned by the debtor. I would have to                                                 | 3        | I don't know -- I know it's a valuable car.                                         |\n| 4        | go back and confirm that but real estate.                                                | 4        | I don't know what the name is and I don't                                           |\n| 5        | So it would be -- he's alive. He resides                                                 | 5        | know who owns them. I know the debtor --                                            |\n| 6        | in a residence and I'm presuming this is                                                 | 6        | just as this says, the debtor has use.                                              |\n| 7        | the appropriate legal description of the                                                 | 7        | Q.<br>So beyond what this says here                                                 |\n| 8        | facts and circumstances of his living in                                                 | 8        | and your previous answer, do you have                                               |\n| 9        | that residence.                                                                          | 9        | anymore information about the vehicles that                                         |\n| 10       | Q.<br>Again, no independent                                                              | 10       | the debtor has use of?                                                              |\n| 11       | investigations into this?                                                                | 11       | A.<br>No.                                                                           |\n| 12       | A.<br>Correct.                                                                           | 12       | Q.<br>Did you witness the debtor                                                    |\n| 13       | Q.<br>Did you perform any evaluation                                                     | 13       | using any luxury vehicles at any time?                                              |\n| 14       | of the residences listed in Question 1?                                                  | 14       | A.<br>I don't know what you mean by                                                 |\n| 15       | A.<br>No.                                                                                | 15       | using but he got out of one in New Haven on                                         |\n| 16       | Q.<br>The second bullet refers to an                                                     | 16       | Wednesday.                                                                          |\n| 17       | apartment in the Sherry Netherland Hotel?                                                | 17       | Q.<br>Do you know what kind of car it                                               |\n| 18       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                               | 18       | was?                                                                                |\n| 19       | Q.<br>Did you draft this section?                                                        | 19       | A.<br>I don't remember.                                                             |\n| 20       | A.<br>Did I draft it? I doubt it. I                                                      | 20       | Q.<br>Is this -- strike that. Is --                                                 |\n| 21       | might have reviewed it. I might have had                                                 | 21       | is the answer to Question 3 relevant to the                                         |\n| 22       | input in something but this is not my                                                    | 22       | preparation of monthly operating reports?                                           |\n| 23       | language.                                                                                | 23       | A.<br>Probably, yes.                                                                |\n| 24       | Q.<br>Are you aware that the entity                                                      | 24       | Q.<br>Why?                                                                          |\n| 25       | holding the legal title to the Sherry                                                    | 25       | A.<br>Because I imagine there's a                                                   |\n|          | Page 114                                                                                 |          |                                                                                     |\n|          |                                                                                          |          | Page 116                                                                            |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |\n| 2        | Netherland apartment is in bankruptcy?                                                   | 2        | cost associated with those vehicles being                                           |\n| 3        | A.<br>Well, I know there's a Chapter                                                     | 3        | provided for his use and again, I don't                                             |\n| 4        | 11 going on. Exactly what's in Chapter 11                                                | 4        | remember exactly what the question is, 4, 5                                         |\n| 5        | and who owns what, I have not confirmed or                                               | 5        | or 6, like E, where the rules say to report                                         |\n| 6        | made an investigation but generally                                                      | 6        | expenses made by third-parties on behalf of                                         |\n| 7        | speaking, I understand that that apartment                                               | 7        | the debtor. Well, I'm thinking the use of                                           |\n| 8        | is somehow in Chapter 11 in New York.                                                    | 8        | the vehicles -- you know, I don't know if                                           |\n| 9        | Q.<br>Any involvement in those                                                           | 9        | there's a car payment on it, gasoline,                                              |\n| 10       | proceedings in New York?                                                                 | 10       | insurance, I don't know but something might                                         |\n| 11       | A.<br>No.                                                                                | 11       | be in there.                                                                        |\n| 12       | Q.<br>Turning to the next page,                                                          | 12       | Q.<br>What about the purchase of the                                                |\n| 13       | Question 3 asks for interests, broadly                                                   | 13       | vehicle itself whenever it was purchased,                                           |\n| 14       | speaking, in any vehicles. The response                                                  | 14       | is that relevant to the monthly operating                                           |\n| 15       | reads that \"the debtor has use of                                                        | 15       | report?                                                                             |\n| 16       | automobiles including luxury automobiles                                                 | 16       | A.<br>Well, monthly operating reports                                               |\n| 17       | and motorcycles\". Did you do any                                                         | 17       | are usually a disbursement in a particular                                          |\n| 18       | investigation into this analysis?                                                        | 18       | time period. I imagine if they've bought                                            |\n| 19       | A.<br>No.                                                                                | 19       | one of those cars during the pendency,                                              |\n| 20       | Q.<br>Do you have any understanding                                                      | 20       | maybe it shows up. I don't know. On the                                             |\n| 21       | of what vehicles the debtor uses?                                                        | 21       | other hand, you could make an argument that                                         |\n| 22       | A.<br>Only from my memory, the -- he                                                     | 22       | the use of the vehicle is not the same                                              |\n| 23       | has access to a luxury vehicle and I think                                               | 23       | thing as buying the vehicle because maybe                                           |\n| 24<br>25 | there's a vehicle that his security travels<br>in. As a matter of fact, they were in New | 24<br>25 | other people use it too. So you would have<br>to find a way of allocating the cost. |\n\n30 (Pages 114 - 117)\n\n<span id=\"page-31-0\"></span>\n\n|        | 85                                                                                    |        |                                                                  |\n|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                                                            | 1      | C. JALBERT                                                       |\n| 2      | Q.<br>Does that answer apply to the                                                   | 2      | A.<br>No.                                                        |\n| 3      | Question 1 about residences as well?                                                  | 3      | Q.<br>Turning to Page 8, Question 26                             |\n| 4      | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                                         | 4      | asks for patents, copyrights, trademarks,                        |\n| 5      | A.<br>The debtor resides in a                                                         | 5      | etcetera. The answer refers to                                   |\n| 6      | particular residence. They're -- the only                                             | 6      | unregistered copyrights and other                                |\n| 7      | people there that I know of, except for a                                             | 7      | intellectual property interest in music and                      |\n| 8      | maid that comes in and security and                                                   | 8      | videos posted to various platforms. What                         |\n| 9      | possibly visits from family. So I imagine                                             | 9      | is this referring to?                                            |\n| 10     | the cost of the residence would be on that                                            | 10     | A.<br>The whole thing?                                           |\n| 11     | so -- that monthly operating report in some                                           | 11     | Q.<br>Yes.                                                       |\n| 12     | amount and I think I -- I was a proponent                                             | 12     | A.<br>The Question 26 refers to                                  |\n| 13     | of 50 percent of that cost would be on                                                | 13     | various intellectual property patents,                           |\n| 14     | behalf of the debtor because the spouse                                               | 14     | copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets and                        |\n| 15     | lives there too and I didn't count the kids                                           | 15     | intellectual property. The debtor -- I'll                        |\n| 16     | because they only came to visit the debtor.                                           | 16     | just read it to you. \"The debtor has                             |\n| 17     | So I kind of ascribed more to the mother                                              | 17     | possible unregistered copyrights and other                       |\n| 18     | and father and split the cost but there's                                             | 18     | intellectual property interest in music and                      |\n| 19     | no home purchase in there. There's no --                                              | 19     | videos posted to various digital and media                       |\n| 20     | again, it's what you pay in that current                                              | 20     | platforms such as YouTube, GTV, Twitter\"                         |\n| 21     | month. So I'm assuming they're telling --                                             | 21     | and -- I don't even know, GETTR, whatever                        |\n| 22     | we're going to be disclosing what is paid                                             | 22     | that is. \"The debtor ascribes no value to                        |\n| 23     | in that particular time frame on behalf of                                            | 23     | his social media assets and has made no                          |\n| 24     | the debtor on the various categories, the                                             | 24     | attempts to monetize his social media                            |\n| 25     | vehicles, the security, the home --                                                   | 25     | presence\".                                                       |\n|        | Page 118                                                                              |        | Page 120                                                         |\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                                                            | 1      | C. JALBERT                                                       |\n|        |                                                                                       |        |                                                                  |\n|        |                                                                                       |        |                                                                  |\n| 2      | Q.<br>Thank you --                                                                    | 2      | Q.<br>Beyond what's written on the                               |\n| 3      | A.<br>Food.                                                                           | 3      | page, do you have any understanding of what                      |\n| 4      | Q.<br>Thank you. Question 4 refers                                                    | 4      | this refers to?                                                  |\n| 5      | to watercraft, aircraft, motor homes and                                              | 5      | A.<br>No.                                                        |\n| 6      | the answer references previous access to                                              | 6      | Q.<br>The second sentence notes that                             |\n| 7<br>8 | the use of a yacht named the Lady May. Do<br>you have any -- beyond what's written on | 7<br>8 | the debtor ascribes no value to these<br>items, do you see that? |\n| 9      | this page, do you have any understanding of                                           | 9      | A.<br>Yep.                                                       |\n| 10     | Mr. Kwok's interest the Lady May?                                                     | 10     | Q.<br>You performed no valuation of                              |\n| 11     | A.<br>Nothing that's not printed on                                                   | 11     | these items in connection with your work?                        |\n| 12     | this page.                                                                            | 12     | A.<br>Correct.                                                   |\n| 13     | Q.<br>Did you do any independent                                                      | 13     | Q.<br>Do you know if any valuation                               |\n| 14     | investigation into this?                                                              | 14     | was performed?                                                   |\n| 15     | A.<br>No.                                                                             | 15     | A.<br>None to my knowledge.                                      |\n| 16     | Q.<br>Items 6 and 7, household goods                                                  | 16     | Q.<br>Question 31 asks for interest                              |\n| 17     | and electronics. I think we covered that                                              | 17     | and insurance policies. The answer refers                        |\n| 18     | previously. In connection with Items 6,                                               | 18     | to his spouse's health insurance policy                          |\n| 19     | household goods through Questions 17 on                                               | 19     | which has no cash value. Do you see that?                        |\n| 20     | this page -- so just for clarity, it's                                                | 20     | A.<br>Yes.                                                       |\n| 21     | Questions 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 17. Did you do                                              | 21     | Q.<br>Is it standard practice that a                             |\n| 22     | any investigation as to what -- as to                                                 | 22     | health insurance policy has no cash value?                       |\n| 23     | whether the items referenced in here belong                                           | 23     | A.<br>I've never seen a situation                                |\n| 24     | to Mr. Kwok versus some other third-party                                             | 24     | where a health insurance policy has a cash                       |\n| 25     | or entity?<br>Page 119                                                                | 25     | value except for to the beneficiary of --<br>Page 121            |\n\n31 (Pages 118 - 121)\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\n<span id=\"page-32-0\"></span>\n\n|                                                                                                                                           | 85                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                           |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |  |  |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|\n| 1<br>2<br>3<br>4<br>5<br>6<br>7<br>8<br>9<br>10<br>11<br>12<br>13<br>14<br>15<br>16<br>17<br>18<br>19<br>20<br>21<br>22<br>23             | C. JALBERT<br>if you have a health insurance plan, it has<br>a lot of value to you when you go to the<br>hospital and it pays the bills for you.<br>There's not an independent value to a<br>third-party that you can sell.<br>Q.<br>Do you have any knowledge about<br>the health insurance policy that the debtor<br>has currently?<br>A.<br>No.<br>Q.<br>Question 53 asks for property<br>of the kind not listed and the answer<br>refers to his membership at Mar-a-Lago Club<br>in Palm Beach. Is this the type of thing<br>that Verdolino and Lowey would include on a<br>monthly operating report if Mr. Kwok, the<br>debtor, used the membership?<br>MR. AULET: Objection to form.<br>A.<br>I would have to use conjecture.<br>Q.<br>Go ahead.<br>A.<br>Well, the first monthly<br>operating report was filed in February. I<br>don't know whether he went down there or                                                                             | 1<br>2<br>3<br>4<br>5<br>6<br>7<br>8<br>9<br>10<br>11<br>12<br>13<br>14<br>15<br>16<br>17<br>18<br>19<br>20<br>21<br>22<br>23             | C. JALBERT<br>Rudnick, Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis<br>to inform you of how he might benefit from<br>things like his like his Mar-a-Lago<br>membership in connection with drafting the<br>monthly operating report?<br>A.<br>I certainly would listen to<br>counsel on that for sure.<br>Q.<br>But Verdolino and Lowey<br>wouldn't endeavor to seek out information<br>about these monthly expenses --<br>A.<br>Well, we're going to seek out<br>and we're going to point to the question<br>and we're going to ask for information<br>that's responsive to that. I don't have<br>access to the information. We don't<br>investigate. I'm not going to keep track<br>of where the debtor goes or doesn't go. So<br>someone would need to tell us the<br>information. We would then review it but<br>I -- I think that Mar-a-Lago thing, at<br>least for the foreseeable future, is not an<br>issue but if it becomes an issue, someone |  |  |\n| 24<br>25                                                                                                                                  | not. I don't know if he went down there in<br>March. If he -- if he went there, I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | 24<br>25                                                                                                                                  | will tell me.<br>Q.<br>Turning to Page 11, Schedule I,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |\n| 1<br>2<br>3<br>4<br>5<br>6<br>7<br>8<br>9<br>10<br>11<br>12<br>13<br>14<br>15<br>16<br>17<br>18<br>19<br>20<br>21<br>22<br>23<br>24<br>25 | Page 122<br>C. JALBERT<br>imagine there would be travel expenses. I<br>don't know whether there would be a fee for<br>the golf and maybe he had lunch. So I<br>imagine if he physically went there and<br>used it, there would be -- there might be<br>-- there would be something in the monthly<br>operating report but if he stays where I<br>think he's going to stay, in Greenwich<br>where he's safe, it's not going to be<br>relevant.<br>Q.<br>What is your basis for thinking<br>he's going to stay where he is in<br>Greenwich?<br>A.<br>I listened to the 341 meeting<br>yesterday -- excuse me, Wednesday.<br>Q.<br>Besides the knowledge gathered<br>from that hearing on Wednesday, the 341<br>hearing, do you have any independent<br>knowledge about the debtor's expected<br>travel or location?<br>A.<br>I have no knowledge whatsoever<br>of where he's going to be at any point in<br>time.<br>Q.<br>Would you rely on Brown<br>Page 123 | 1<br>2<br>3<br>4<br>5<br>6<br>7<br>8<br>9<br>10<br>11<br>12<br>13<br>14<br>15<br>16<br>17<br>18<br>19<br>20<br>21<br>22<br>23<br>24<br>25 | Page 124<br>C. JALBERT<br>the second to last sentence here and it's<br>that \"the debtor plans to amend Form 122B<br>filed on February 15th, 2022 in which<br>debtor erroneously claimed monthly income<br>of \\$19,488\". Do you see that?<br>A.<br>Yes.<br>Q.<br>Do you know what that refers<br>to?<br>A.<br>Yes.<br>Q.<br>What is it?<br>A.<br>The debtor inadvertently or<br>accidently -- I don't know what the term<br>would be -- erroneously filed a Form 122B.<br>It included \\$19,488 dollars which met --<br>the form met for the monthly income, I<br>think the review by the lawyers was that's<br>incorrect and so they -- the debtor filed<br>an amended 122B or at least intended to --<br>I don't know if it's done yet or not --<br>excluding that income.<br>Q.<br>Did Verdolino and Lowey perform<br>any work in connection with that erroneous<br>inclusion?<br>A.<br>I'm sure anything we did was in<br>Page 125         |  |  |\n\n32 (Pages 122 - 125)\n\n<span id=\"page-33-0\"></span>Page 126 1 C. JALBERT 2 consultation with the lawyers. 3 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 4 Sorry. 5 Q. Turning to Page 13, Question 16 6 refers to a retainer of 500 thousand for 7 Brown Rudnick and then refers to one 8 million dollars from Lamp Capital. Do you 9 have any knowledge of that transaction 10 outside of what's written on the page? 11 A. I think there was discussion of 12 it yesterday -- excuse me, on Wednesday at 13 the 341 meeting and I think I saw a draft 14 of Brown Rudnick's retention papers -- I 15 think I did where I thought something was 16 mentioned in there. 17 Q. Do you recall what that was? 18 A. No. Something along the lines 19 of what's right here. 20 Q. Do you know what Lamp Capital 21 LLC is? 22 A. An entity owned by someone that 23 is not the debtor. 24 Q. Do you have any idea who it is 25 owned by? Page 127 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. Only a guess. 3 Q. Can you tell me -- I guess you 4 don't need to speculate. Do you have any 5 information that -- about what informs your 6 guess? 7 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 8 A. My memory was there was a lot 9 being talked about but my memory was 10 something was said during the 341 meeting 11 but it is very -- I was very back of the 12 room, as you know, and it was very hard for 13 me to hear the English version from the 14 interpreter. So I can't be sure but I 15 thought I heard something that discussed 16 who owned Lamp. 17 Q. Outside of what you heard at 18 the 341 hearing and this other document 19 that you remember seeing, do you have any 20 knowledge about Lamp or its operations? 21 A. No. 22 Q. The next item, Question 18 23 refers to a litigation funding agreement 24 dated November 8th, 2021. Have you seen 25 that agreement? Page 128 1 C. JALBERT 2 A. There are actually five of them 3 I think. They're listed in Schedule D. I 4 don't recall whether I actually saw them or 5 not. I think they were briefly described 6 to me at a minimum by lawyers. 7 Q. Any independent knowledge of 8 those agreements besides -- 9 A. No. 10 Q. Did Verdolino and Lowey do any 11 other investigation in connection with the 12 assets we've talked about that we didn't 13 cover? 14 A. No. 15 Q. Those five litigation 16 agreements we talked about -- 17 A. The litigation funding 18 agreements? 19 Q. Yes. Thank you. Have you seen 20 them before? 21 A. Not to my knowledge. 22 MS. ARONSSON: The Court 23 Reporter is going to hand you what's 24 being marked as Jalbert Exhibit 7. 25 This is a document produced in this Page 129 1 C. JALBERT 2 matter with the Bates stamp Kwok 3 00001752. 4 MR. AULET: Just for the 5 record, it's two separate documents 6 so we should make sure -- 7 MS. ARONSSON: I'll represent 8 that this is a family of documents, 9 an e-mail and an attachment. 10 (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was 11 marked as Jalbert Exhibit 7 for 12 identification as of this date by the 13 Reporter.) 14 Q. Mr. Jalbert, I understand 15 you're not on this e-mail. I'm just going 16 to ask you some basic questions about it. 17 This is an e-mail between a redacted 18 person, Aaron Mitchell, Matt Flynn and 19 Melissa Francis. Matt Flynn is your 20 colleague. We've talked about the other 21 folks. The attachment is a summary of 22 living expenses from the period February 23 15th to 28th. First, I'm going to ask who 24 is this e-mail from? 25 MR. AULET: And I will object\n\n33 (Pages 126 - 129)\n\n<span id=\"page-34-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                               |          |                                                                                     |  |  |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                       | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |  |  |\n| 2        | and direct him the Witness to answer                             | 2        | Q.<br>Is this the monthly operating                                                 |  |  |\n| 3        | for the same reasons that we                                     | 3        | report filing that we've been discussing                                            |  |  |\n| 4        | discussed previously on the record.                              | 4        | that you've been involved in preparing?                                             |  |  |\n| 5        | MS. ARONSSON: And we'll                                          | 5        | A.<br>Looks like it, yes.                                                           |  |  |\n| 6        | continue to dispute the redaction                                | 6        | Q.<br>Turning to the filing 120-1,                                                  |  |  |\n| 7        | here.                                                            | 7        | the separate loose page, these line items                                           |  |  |\n| 8        | Q.<br>Turning to the attachment, this                            | 8        | here, can you just explain broadly what                                             |  |  |\n| 9        | summary of expenses, this was provided by a                      | 9        | they are at the bottom? What does the                                               |  |  |\n| 10       | person -- the unknown person in the top                          | 10       | total reflect?                                                                      |  |  |\n| 11       | e-mail, is that right?                                           | 11       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                                       |  |  |\n| 12       | A.<br>Yes.                                                       | 12       | A.<br>You're referring to the                                                       |  |  |\n| 13       | Q.<br>Is it fair to say that this is                             | 13       | \\$109,827.12?                                                                       |  |  |\n| 14       | the starting point for Verdolino's monthly                       | 14       | Q.<br>Yes.                                                                          |  |  |\n| 15       | operating report draft?                                          | 15       | A.<br>I'm trying to see who made the                                                |  |  |\n| 16       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                    | 16       | payments but inadvertently, the family, on                                          |  |  |\n| 17       | A.<br>As to the one particular                                   | 17       | behalf of the debtor, on February 16th, the                                         |  |  |\n| 18       | question, yes.                                                   | 18       | day after the filing, made these two                                                |  |  |\n| 19       | Q.<br>Sorry. What do you mean?                                   | 19       | payments on pre-petition amounts. So this                                           |  |  |\n| 20       | A.<br>This answers one question on                               | 20       | was, in an abundance of caution, in the 161                                         |  |  |\n| 21       | the monthly operating report and again, I                        | 21       | thousand dollars that was shown on Part 1,                                          |  |  |\n| 22       | don't remember off hand exactly which one                        | 22       | Number E, this 109 thousand dollars is                                              |  |  |\n| 23       | it is but something, 4, 5, 6E. The funds                         | 23       | included in the 161,323. So we were -- the                                          |  |  |\n| 24       | paid by third-parties on behalf of the                           | 24       | lawyers felt it was important to supplement                                         |  |  |\n| 25       | debtor. This is the first pass.                                  | 25       | the monthly operating report with that                                              |  |  |\n|          | Page 130                                                         |          | Page 132                                                                            |  |  |\n|          |                                                                  |          |                                                                                     |  |  |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                       | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |  |  |\n| 2        | MS. ARONSSON: McKenzie, Tab                                      | 2        | information that this was really a                                                  |  |  |\n| 3        | 19.                                                              | 3        | pre-petition payment paid post-petition.                                            |  |  |\n| 4        | THE WITNESS: Are you done?                                       | 4        | Q.<br>Understood. Thank you. So the                                                 |  |  |\n| 5        | MS. ARONSSON: No.                                                | 5        | total expenses \\$161,323 here, if we                                                |  |  |\n| 6        | MR. AULET: Should we have the                                    | 6        | subtract from that, the total inadvertent                                           |  |  |\n| 7        | back up marked as a separate exhibit                             | 7        | payments is \\$109,827. What does that                                               |  |  |\n| 8        | or --                                                            | 8        | amount reflect?                                                                     |  |  |\n| 9        | MS. ARONSSON: I typically mark                                   | 9        | A.<br>The amount of the payments that                                               |  |  |\n| 10       | them as one.                                                     | 10       | weren't these two payments that were made                                           |  |  |\n| 11       | MR. AULET: Okay.                                                 | 11       | in the period from February 15th to                                                 |  |  |\n| 12       | THE WITNESS: We'll put them                                      | 12       | February 28th by third-parties on behalf of                                         |  |  |\n| 13       | together again and eliminate the blue                            | 13       | the debtor.                                                                         |  |  |\n| 14       | sheet.                                                           | 14       | Q.<br>Would that be reflected in the                                                |  |  |\n| 15       | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                                     | 15       | final version of the living expenses sheet                                          |  |  |\n| 16       | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 8 for                                  | 16       | that we looked at on Exhibit Number 7?                                              |  |  |\n| 17       | identification as of this date by the                            | 17       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                          |  |  |\n| 18       | Reporter.)                                                       | 18       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                                       |  |  |\n| 19       | Q.<br>The Court Reporter is going to                             | 19       | Q.<br>Is anything else included in                                                  |  |  |\n| 20       | hand you what's being marked as Jalbert                          | 20       | that number, to your knowledge?                                                     |  |  |\n| 21       | Exhibit 8.                                                       | 21       | A.<br>Well, inadvertently, yes. We                                                  |  |  |\n| 22       | A.<br>Have you given it to her yet?                              | 22       | found out that whoever created the form on                                          |  |  |\n| 23       | MS. ARONSSON: This is a                                          | 23       | the security total dollars, whatever the                                            |  |  |\n| 24<br>25 | document filed in this case as Docket<br>120 and document 120-1. | 24<br>25 | final total dollars were, there was a<br>payment made February 10 pre-petition that |  |  |\n\n34 (Pages 130 - 133)\n\n<span id=\"page-35-0\"></span>\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                            |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2        | was inadvertently included in the payments                                               | 2        | that the categories were properly described                                           |\n| 3        | from February 15th to 28th. So that will                                                 | 3        | because this is not nearly final. This --                                             |\n| 4        | be corrected on the next operating report.                                               | 4        | there were some errors and we also worked                                             |\n| 5        | Q.<br>So included in this operating                                                      | 5        | with counsel and others in trying to figure                                           |\n| 6        | report is the two inadvertent payments to                                                | 6        | out what the percentage of the monies that                                            |\n| 7        | the law firms identified on Exhibit 8?                                                   | 7        | were paid in Column C multiplied by a                                                 |\n| 8        | A.<br>Yes, correct.                                                                      | 8        | distribution percentage to arrive at the                                              |\n| 9        | Q.<br>The monthly operating living                                                       | 9        | total. We worked with the preparer to make                                            |\n| 10       | expenses that we've talked about and then                                                | 10       | sure that the descriptions on the schedule                                            |\n| 11       | this other payment that you said would be                                                | 11       | were accurate. We tried to confirm the                                                |\n| 12       | corrected, is that right?                                                                | 12       | numbers were accurate. We couldn't get the                                            |\n| 13       | A.<br>It's included in the 161.                                                          | 13       | information in time to be able to do that                                             |\n| 14       | We'll be pulling that out when we do the                                                 | 14       | but then we looked at the distribution                                                |\n| 15       | March -- so the way the form works usually                                               | 15       | percentages using our judgment in working                                             |\n| 16       | is you have payments paid currently and                                                  | 16       | with the lawyers.                                                                     |\n| 17       | cumulative. We will take that small amount                                               | 17       | Q.<br>Looking at this draft, living                                                   |\n| 18<br>19 | of money out of the cumulative so as to<br>have the correct number going forward.        | 18<br>19 | expense chart in Exhibit 7, there are seven<br>line items. Is that right?             |\n| 20       | Q.<br>So is it fair to say that                                                          | 20       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                            |\n| 21       | Verdolino and Lowey's role in connection                                                 | 21       | Q.<br>Is it fair to say that                                                          |\n| 22       | with these inadvertent payments was to kind                                              | 22       | Verdolino and Lowey crosschecked the names                                            |\n| 23       | of double check the amounts included in the                                              | 23       | of the categories to ensure that they                                                 |\n| 24       | monthly operating report?                                                                | 24       | accurately depicted the expenses contained                                            |\n| 25       | A.<br>We tried but given the timing                                                      | 25       | in those line items?                                                                  |\n|          | Page 134                                                                                 |          | Page 136                                                                              |\n|          |                                                                                          |          |                                                                                       |\n|          |                                                                                          |          |                                                                                       |\n| 1<br>2   | C. JALBERT<br>of when the information became available                                   | 1<br>2   | C. JALBERT<br>A.<br>We did the best we could, yes.                                    |\n| 3        | and when the form had to be filed, there                                                 | 3        | Q.<br>What more information would                                                     |\n| 4        | was a miscommunication with the preparer of                                              | 4        | have been helpful to help you get to that                                             |\n| 5        | the schedule that will be rectified.                                                     | 5        | determination?                                                                        |\n| 6        | Q.<br>Who's the preparer of the                                                          | 6        | A.<br>If we could have seen what                                                      |\n| 7        | schedule?                                                                                | 7        | the -- what the actual payees and                                                     |\n| 8        | A.<br>I can't tell you.                                                                  | 8        | disbursements were, it probably would have                                            |\n| 9        | Q.<br>What schedule are you referring                                                    | 9        | helped us with the categorization.                                                    |\n| 10       | to, this document here, the monthly                                                      | 10       | Q.<br>But you didn't receive that?                                                    |\n| 11       | operating report, Exhibit 8?                                                             | 11       | A.<br>Not -- not at that time, no.                                                    |\n| 12       | A.<br>This thing (indicating).                                                           | 12       | Q.<br>Is the extent of information                                                    |\n| 13       | Q.<br>So the number 161 here refers                                                      | 13       | you received regarding these line items                                               |\n| 14       | to this spreadsheet in Exhibit 7 as                                                      | 14       | included in this chart here?                                                          |\n| 15       | reflected with your edits, with Verdolino                                                | 15       | A.<br>As of the date that we made                                                     |\n| 16       | and Lowey's edits?                                                                       | 16       | available all the -- I'm sure there's an                                              |\n| 17       | A.<br>The 161 is the sum of the final                                                    | 17       | updated version because this doesn't tie to                                           |\n| 18       | number from Exhibit 8 plus the 109.                                                      | 18       | here (indicating) and then we -- long after                                           |\n| 19       | Q.<br>What work did Verdolino and                                                        | 19       | we produced the information for -- for this                                           |\n| 20       | Lowey do in connection with getting to the                                               | 20       | deposition, there's been continuing ongoing                                           |\n| 21       | final numbers?                                                                           | 21       | discussions because we're getting ready to                                            |\n| 22       | A.<br>We worked with counsel and                                                         | 22       | file -- excuse me, the March MOR in April.                                            |\n| 23       | Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis trying                                                | 23       | Q.<br>We'll turn to the -- what I                                                     |\n| 24<br>25 | to review -- we didn't have details but we<br>were trying to ask questions and make sure | 24<br>25 | think is the final version but we talked<br>about the categories, the amount you said |\n\n35 (Pages 134 - 137)\n\n<span id=\"page-36-0\"></span>Page 138 1 C. JALBERT 2 that, at the time of this filing, you did 3 not have information to be able to verify 4 the amounts attributed to each category. 5 Is that right? 6 A. Yes. 7 Q. What information would have 8 been helpful for you to cross check those 9 amounts? 10 A. Like I said, the name of the 11 payee, a description of what the service 12 was and the amount of the funds. 13 Q. The percentage distribution, 14 what does that mean? 15 A. The -- so for instance, 16 security was, in this sheet, \\$43,655.44. 17 The drafter of this and anyone that he 18 consulted with or she consulted with was 40 19 percent. Amongst talking with our team and 20 with the lawyer team, we thought that that 21 probably should be one hundred percent 22 because the only reason -- the security is 23 entirely related to Mr. Kwok and his 24 safety. There wouldn't be security if the 25 wife and the kids or others at the Page 139 1 C. JALBERT 2 compound, if it weren't for Mr. Kwok. So 3 we proposed changing and I think that did 4 get changed to a hundred percent. 5 Q. In revising these percentage 6 distributions, did you rely entirely on 7 information received from Brown Rudnick and 8 Aaron Mitchell and Melissa Francis and this 9 undisclosed person? 10 A. The first pass was the 11 undisclosed person. After we got this 12 information from the undisclosed person, 13 most of the discussion was between our 14 firm, my firm and the lawyer -- lawyers. 15 How long is this is going to go? Because 16 if it's going to go a bit, now I would like 17 to use the restroom. I'll be fast. 18 MS. ARONSSON: We can take a 19 break. We'll go off the record. 20 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 21 1:22 p.m. We're off the record. 22 (Whereupon, a short recess was 23 taken and upon resuming, E-mail Chain 24 was marked as Jalbert Exhibit 9 for 25 identification as of this date by the Page 140 1 C. JALBERT 2 Reporter.) 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is 4 1:28 p.m. We're back on the record. 5 You may proceed. 6 Q. I think you have received 7 what's been marked as Jalbert Exhibit 9. 8 This bears the Bates Kwok 00001684. Do you 9 recognize this document? 10 A. Yes. 11 Q. Turning to the attachment, to 12 your knowledge, is this the final version 13 of the living expenses for the period 14 February 15th to February 28th? 15 A. I think it is. 16 Q. I'll represent, if you add 17 \\$51,495.67 plus the 109 thousand -- 18 A. 161. 19 Q. So we're on the same page, this 20 is the final version? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. Does this final version reflect 23 Verdolino and Lowey's edits on the initial 24 draft provided by an unknown person? 25 A. Well, it's certainly -- as you Page 141 1 C. JALBERT 2 can see from the e-mail, we made 3 suggestions but counsel clearly reviewed 4 and assisted with the final decision and 5 I'm sure they also checked with the debtor. 6 I did not. 7 Q. So just walking through these 8 five suggestions, why did you increase the 9 meals to 50 percent or why did you 10 recommend increasing the meals to 50 11 percent? 12 A. Because there's a husband and a 13 wife and one hundred percent divided by two 14 is by 50 percent. 15 Q. Do you have any understanding 16 as to why the draft had allocated the 17 numbers in the way it had in Exhibit 7? 18 MR. AULET: Objection to form. 19 A. So I think what the creator of 20 the initial -- my memory is the creator of 21 the initial document took into 22 consideration that occasionally, the 23 debtor's daughter and maybe one or two 24 other people occasionally showed up and so 25 I think they ascribed some of the cost to 85\n\n36 (Pages 138 - 141)\n\n<span id=\"page-37-0\"></span>Page 142 1 C. JALBERT those people but our feeling in consultation with the attorneys was that the only reason those people are there is they're coming to visit the debtor and that's why they incurred the cost. So I thought they should put 50 percent to the husband and 50 percent to the wife and that's how we got the 50 percent. 10 Q. Besides what you just described to me, do you have anymore reasons for suggesting the increase of 50 percent? 13 A. Not that I can remember. 14 Q. Item 2 is security is increased to 100 and looking at the draft in Exhibit 7, it was 40 percent. What was your reasoning for suggesting to increase the security to 100? 19 A. Again, the only reason there's any security at all is all about the debtor. So in an abundance of caution, we're ascribing that cost, one hundred percent of that cost to the debtor. The wife likely would not have security concerns if she were not married to Page 143 1 C. JALBERT Mr. Kwok and when the daughter or others sometimes travel, they need security as well. So for whatever reason, their security is all related to the debtor. We suggested going to a hundred percent. It was discussed among the group and everyone agreed to the 100 percent. 9 Q. What is the basis for your assumption that the primary reason security has been retained is directly related to the debtor? 13 A. Discussion with Melissa Francis and Aaron Mitchell who confirmed in several phone calls that the debtor is harassed and threatened and otherwise scared for his existence and to the extent the -- I'm told to the extent the family is scared, they're scared because of their relationship to their father. 21 Q. Is there any other reasoning that you haven't articulated about the basis for your increasing security to one hundred? 25 A. Well, it is very conservative Page 144 1 C. JALBERT to ascribe the one hundred percent of the cost to the debtor is -- means that all that costs -- we could have left it at 30 percent and probably made it a callable argument of why it could be 30 percent. We wanted to go with -- I think part of the final reasoning amongst the group was that it's conservative to report all of it on the debtor's behalf because of his safety concerns is -- that was the reasoning. 12 Q. Thank you. Item 3 is utilities increased to 50 percent and I'll represent Exhibit 7 has it at 30 percent and you ascribe the same explanation as the meals. Is there any other -- 17 A. No, it's the same -- it's the same -- it's the same theme at different percentages for most of these. 20 Q. Item 4 refers to housekeeping. I believe Verdolino and Lowey recommended changing repair and maintenance to housekeeping? 24 A. Well, as it turns out, once we were able to speak with someone and get Page 145 1 C. JALBERT some information that's behind the numbers, we found out that that's the cost of the maid for those 15 days or maids or maid service or cleaning service and not maintenance. So it's just a matter of calling it what it was. Had we seen detail, we would have understood that on a more timely basis. 10 Q. Your reasoning for increasing the allocation from 30 to 50 percent, is it fair to say it's the same reasoning behind -- 14 A. It's a husband and a wife. You know, any other cleaning they do on behalf of anybody else, the only reason they're there is because the Kwok's are there. The debtor and his spouse. 19 Q. You note at the bottom of the page, \"in our opinion, it's best to be more conservative\". That's another reasoning behind your -- 23 A. Yes. 24 Q. -- suggestion to increase the allocations? Is that yes?\n\n37 (Pages 142 - 145)\n\n85\n\n<span id=\"page-38-0\"></span>\n\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                       |\n|----|---------------------------------------------|----|--------------------------------------------------|\n| 2  | A.<br>Yes.                                  | 2  | THE WITNESS: Okay.                               |\n| 3  | Q.<br>I do want to talk about the           | 3  | Q.<br>Turning to Page 2, Melissa                 |\n| 4  | insurance changed to zero percent from 30   | 4  | Francis notes that, \"since MK doesn't own        |\n| 5  | percent.                                    | 5  | the Connecticut property, can you please         |\n| 6  | MS. ARONSSON: I think,                      | 6  | just explain the applicability of the            |\n| 7  | Makenzie, can you hand me Tab 14?           | 7  | following entries as his monthly expenses?       |\n| 8  | A.<br>All done?                             | 8  | And what type of insurance is it?\" Do you        |\n| 9  | Q.<br>Yes. Before I show you the            | 9  | see that?                                        |\n| 10 | document, do you recall information about   | 10 | A.<br>Yes.                                       |\n| 11 | the change from 30 percent to zero percent  | 11 | Q.<br>What do you understand Ms.                 |\n| 12 | for the insurance line item?                | 12 | Francis to be asking here?                       |\n| 13 | A.<br>I recall talking with my              | 13 | A.<br>Since the debtor doesn't own               |\n| 14 | colleague about it after he found out the   | 14 | the Connecticut property, can you please         |\n| 15 | facts, yes.                                 | 15 | justify the applicability of the following       |\n| 16 | Q.<br>What do you remember about that       | 16 | entries as his monthly expenses and she's        |\n| 17 | interaction?                                | 17 | asking what type of insurance.                   |\n| 18 | A.<br>Well, I think he found out the        | 18 | Q.<br>What is your view, if any, on              |\n| 19 | insurance payment that -- that 13 thousand  | 19 | her question?                                    |\n| 20 | dollars on Number 9 here was one hundred    | 20 | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                    |\n| 21 | percent pertaining to the Sherry apartment  | 21 | A.<br>I would like to answer them                |\n| 22 | in New York City where he did not live      | 22 | correctly.                                       |\n| 23 | during this time frame and so to the extent | 23 | Q.<br>You would like to answer the               |\n| 24 | that someone is paying those bills of the   | 24 | monthly reporting --                             |\n| 25 | Sherry, I think that's the Sherry's problem | 25 | A.<br>I'm hoping we answered her                 |\n|    | Page 146                                    |    | Page 148                                         |\n|    |                                             |    |                                                  |\n| 1  | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                       |\n| 2  | and not on account of the debtor because as | 2  | questions. I mean this is going onto the         |\n| 3  | I'm told by the attorneys, everyone's       | 3  | monthly reporting but I'm hoping we              |\n| 4  | understanding, from the facts is that he's  | 4  | answered them correctly.                         |\n| 5  | -- he does not have an interest in that     | 5  | Q.<br>Substantively, what is your                |\n| 6  | real estate. So he shouldn't have any       | 6  | view on her question here?                       |\n| 7  | percentage in the expenses shown on the     | 7  | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                    |\n| 8  | monthly operating report.                   | 8  | A.<br>I don't want to try and guess              |\n| 9  | (Whereupon, E-mail Chain was                | 9  | what she was thinking.                           |\n| 10 | marked as Jalbert Exhibit 10 for            | 10 | Q.<br>So you have no understanding --            |\n| 11 | identification as of this date by the       | 11 | Verdolino and Lowey has no understanding         |\n| 12 | Reporter.)                                  | 12 | about the question she's asking here?            |\n| 13 | MS. ARONSSON: The Court                     | 13 | A.<br>I have my understanding.                   |\n| 14 | Reporter is going to be handing you         | 14 | Q.<br>Okay. Turning to the first                 |\n| 15 | what's marked as Jalbert Exhibit 10.        | 15 | page, Mr. Flynn responds, \"correct, he           |\n| 16 | This is a document produced in this         | 16 | doesn't own it but he lives in the               |\n| 17 | matter with the Bates Kwok 00001691.        | 17 | Connecticut house so these expenses that         |\n| 18 | Q.<br>I understand you're not on this       | 18 | are paid are benefitting him\". Do you have       |\n| 19 | document but I just want to discuss a       | 19 | any understanding of what Mr. Flynn is           |\n| 20 | couple issues here. Do you recognize this   | 20 | saying here?                                     |\n| 21 | document?                                   | 21 | A.<br>That's why he's saying that                |\n| 22 | A.<br>No, but I recognize the               | 22 | since he lives there, he aught to be --          |\n| 23 | subject.                                    | 23 | there should be some level of those              |\n| 24 | MR. HARBACH: Give him a minute              | 24 | expenses ascribed to him in the monthly          |\n| 25 | to read it.<br>Page 147                     | 25 | operating report in that Question 8.<br>Page 149 |\n\n38 (Pages 146 - 149)\n\n<span id=\"page-39-0\"></span>\n\n|        | 85                                                                                      |        |                                                                                        |\n|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                                                              | 1      | C. JALBERT                                                                             |\n| 2      | Q.<br>Mr. Flynn continues, \"I have a                                                    | 2      | A.<br>I don't know.                                                                    |\n| 3      | question regarding the insurance as well                                                | 3      | Q.<br>The original allocation to this                                                  |\n| 4      | since this is insurance on the apartment of                                             | 4      | line item I think is --                                                                |\n| 5      | the Sherry\". Do you understand what issue                                               | 5      | MR. HARBACH: Right here                                                                |\n| 6      | hes referring to here?                                                                  | 6      | (indicating).                                                                          |\n| 7      | A.<br>Yes.                                                                              | 7      | Q.<br>-- at 13 thousand and that's                                                     |\n| 8      | Q.<br>Can you explain it for me?                                                        | 8      | reflected on Page 2. \\$13,611. Besides Ms.                                             |\n| 9      | A.<br>Well, in the Number 8 -- no,                                                      | 9      | Francis' e-mail, do you have any                                                       |\n| 10     | Number 9, the original version of this had                                              | 10     | independent knowledge of that information?                                             |\n| 11     | insurance. We didn't know what it was                                                   | 11     | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                                          |\n| 12     | insurance on. Frankly, when we got it, we                                               | 12     | A.<br>No. It came from Melissa                                                         |\n| 13     | assumed it was on the Greenwich residence                                               | 13     | Francis. I don't know where she got that                                               |\n| 14     | where the debtor and his spouse actually                                                | 14     | number from or why.                                                                    |\n| 15     | reside. We factually found out that it's                                                | 15     | Q.<br>Did you look into insurance for                                                  |\n| 16     | actually insurance on the Sherry and when                                               | 16     | the Greenwich property?                                                                |\n| 17     | we found out it's insurance on the Sherry,                                              | 17     | A.<br>No.                                                                              |\n| 18     | since the debtor doesn't live there and                                                 | 18     | Q.<br>Why not?                                                                         |\n| 19     | doesn't own it, by review of materials from                                             | 19     | A.<br>We asked for someone in the --                                                   |\n| 20     | the lawyers, it should be eliminated and                                                | 20     | with the correct knowledge to give us all                                              |\n| 21     | that's what we proposed, to eliminate it.                                               | 21     | of the expenses paid cash, check, wire                                                 |\n| 22     | Q.<br>It was ultimately eliminated?                                                     | 22     | transfer, HCH, any other method, February                                              |\n| 23     | A.<br>Yes.                                                                              | 23     | 15th to February 28th on behalf of the                                                 |\n| 24     | Q.<br>Mr. Flynn continues \"I am not\"                                                    | 24     | debtor. We didn't leave any -- we didn't                                               |\n| 25     | I am not sure it should be included here?<br>Page 150                                   | 25     | ask for -- we didn't leave any<br>Page 152                                             |\n|        |                                                                                         |        |                                                                                        |\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                                                              | 1      | C. JALBERT                                                                             |\n| 2<br>3 | I think that's what he means -- \"in this<br>calculation but interested on your thoughts | 2<br>3 | restrictions. We just said give us all of<br>that information. We got a summary chart. |\n| 4      | and also asking Craig\". Do you recall him                                               | 4      | You saw it and it wasn't till we started                                               |\n| 5      | asking your opinion on this?                                                            | 5      | asking questions to understand some of the                                             |\n| 6      | A.<br>Yes.                                                                              | 6      | background and what is behind the numbers                                              |\n| 7      | Q.<br>Is your opinion the same as                                                       | 7      | that we started making assessments and                                                 |\n| 8      | Mr. Flynn's here --                                                                     | 8      | changing what we think the legal group and                                             |\n| 9      | A.<br>Yes.                                                                              | 9      | us thought it was appropriate.                                                         |\n| 10     | Q.<br>Do you recall speaking with                                                       | 10     | CONTINUED EXAMINATION                                                                  |\n| 11     | Mr. Flynn about that?                                                                   | 11     | BY MR. HARBACH:                                                                        |\n| 12     | A.<br>I do.                                                                             | 12     | Q.<br>You said a moment ago that                                                       |\n| 13     | Q.<br>Turning to the top e-mail here                                                    | 13     | originally, you and your team thought that                                             |\n| 14     |                                                                                         | 14     | the 13 -- excuse me, I think you said you                                              |\n| 15     | on this chain, on Page 1, Mr. Flynn asks,                                               |        |                                                                                        |\n|        | \"how much was paid during this period for                                               | 15     | assumed that the \\$13,611 was for the                                                  |\n| 16     | the Sherry\". Do you see that?                                                           | 16     | Greenwich property because that's where he                                             |\n| 17     | A.<br>Yes.                                                                              | 17     | was living. I got that right?                                                          |\n| 18     | Q.<br>Do you know the answer to that                                                    | 18     | A.<br>Yes, sir.                                                                        |\n| 19     | question?                                                                               | 19     | Q.<br>Then you were told that the                                                      |\n| 20     | A.<br>I have no idea. Also, I don't                                                     | 20     | 13,611 was actually for the Sherry, right?                                             |\n| 21     | know why he asked it.                                                                   | 21     | A.<br>Correct.                                                                         |\n| 22     | Q.<br>That was going to be my                                                           | 22     | Q.<br>And at that point, you did not                                                   |\n| 23     | question. Why would it matter whether --                                                | 23     | inquire about was there actually any                                                   |\n| 24     | how much it was as to whether it should be                                              | 24     | insurance money paid for the Greenwich                                                 |\n| 25     | included in the monthly operating report?<br>Page 151                                   | 25     | property during this period, you didn't ask<br>Page 153                                |\n\n39 (Pages 150 - 153)\n\n<span id=\"page-40-0\"></span>\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                            | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                            |\n|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2        | that question?                                                                        | 2        | with the Brown Rudnick firm and Melissa                                               |\n| 3        | A.<br>No, we assumed -- actually,                                                     | 3        | Francis and Aaron Mitchell to determine                                               |\n| 4        | Matt had confirmed this is a list of all                                              | 4        | what the accrual of professional fees. All                                            |\n| 5        | the payments made during this time frame.                                             | 5        | professionals, state professionals,                                                   |\n| 6        | So we had the universe that wasn't another                                            | 6        | committee professionals, debtor                                                       |\n| 7        | insurance payment and you know, most --                                               | 7        | professionals, ordinary course -- alleged                                             |\n| 8        | many of us have owned homes. My own                                                   | 8        | ordinary course professionals, everybody                                              |\n| 9        | empirical knowledge is you typically pay                                              | 9        | because we need to record the accrual. So                                             |\n| 10       | your homeowner's insurance once a year.                                               | 10       | it's not just -- the operating report is                                              |\n| 11       | It's usually -- in the Sherry, this 13                                                | 11       | not just asking for what was paid during                                              |\n| 12       | thousand dollars might have been just a                                               | 12       | that period. It's asking for what's the --                                            |\n|          |                                                                                       |          |                                                                                       |\n| 13       | payment for the year on a 2.5 million                                                 | 13       | the new form is asking what are the unpaid                                            |\n| 14       | dollar entity. They didn't tell us it was                                             | 14       | amounts and we couldn't get it in time to                                             |\n| 15       | a payment so I didn't ask.                                                            | 15       | get the February one. So we're going to                                               |\n| 16       | CONTINUED EXAMINATION                                                                 | 16       | catch up in this March one, we're going to                                            |\n| 17       | BY MS. ARONSSON:                                                                      | 17       | establish what the February accrual was and                                           |\n| 18       | Q.<br>So I think we've covered the                                                    | 18       | we're going to find out what the March                                                |\n| 19       | work that you have done in connection with                                            | 19       | accrual was and then we'll have the correct                                           |\n| 20       | the monthly operating report for the period                                           | 20       | information and it will have to be                                                    |\n| 21       | February 15th to February 28th. We've been                                            | 21       | maintained as we go along and obviously, as                                           |\n| 22       | looking at that document. Is that right?                                              | 22       | time goes on, if things go according to the                                           |\n| 23       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                            | 23       | way the debtor would like, there will be                                              |\n| 24       | Q.<br>Can you think of anything else                                                  | 24       | payment on those fees. So there'll be more                                            |\n| 25       | that we haven't talked about with the work                                            | 25       | accruals and then payments and the same                                               |\n|          | Page 154                                                                              |          | Page 156                                                                              |\n|          |                                                                                       |          |                                                                                       |\n|          |                                                                                       |          |                                                                                       |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                            | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                            |\n| 2        | that you've done, in connection with                                                  | 2        | thing is true of the estate professionals                                             |\n| 3        | preparing that document?                                                              | 3        | and the committee and its professionals.                                              |\n| 4        | A.<br>Off the top of my head, no.                                                     | 4        | It will be a roll forward of what the                                                 |\n| 5        | Q.<br>I think you referenced you're                                                   | 5        | liability is and the cash will be reported                                            |\n| 6        | preparing the next reporting cycle?                                                   | 6        | on Page 1. It will create liability to the                                            |\n| 7        | A.<br>Yes.                                                                            | 7        | United States Trustee for their fee --                                                |\n| 8        | Q.<br>Can you describe your general                                                   | 8        | their -- their -- it's a fee. It's not a                                              |\n| 9        | process and how that defers, if it does,                                              | 9        | commission. Their fee for -- which is                                                 |\n| 10       | with your reporting cycle for the February                                            | 10       | entirely predicated on cash disbursements                                             |\n| 11       | 15th to February 28th period?                                                         | 11       | during the time of the monthly operating                                              |\n| 12       | A.<br>So the monthly operating report                                                 | 12       | report.                                                                               |\n| 13       | is basically presenting information and the                                           | 13       | Q.<br>Do you anticipate -- strike                                                     |\n| 14       | two buckets of information that are in the                                            | 14       | that. Besides information that you'll                                                 |\n| 15       | monthly operating report as for this debtor                                           | 15       | receive from Brown Rudnick, from Aaron                                                |\n| 16       | is that Question E, the funds disbursed on                                            | 16       | Mitchell, from Melissa Francis and an                                                 |\n| 17       | his behalf in the 31 day period, March 1 to                                           | 17       | unknown person, do you anticipate doing any                                           |\n| 18       | March 31, we're going to -- we're going to                                            | 18       | investigation in connection with future                                               |\n| 19       | figure out -- we're going to get a list.                                              | 19       | monthly operating reports?                                                            |\n| 20       | This time, we're going to get a list so we                                            | 20       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                                         |\n| 21       | can see what there was and we can have --                                             | 21       | A.<br>I don't know what you                                                           |\n|          |                                                                                       |          |                                                                                       |\n| 22       | we can have more educated discussion with                                             | 22       | consider -- I'm not going to -- we're going                                           |\n| 23       | the lawyers about what was paid. That will                                            | 23       | to get a report from someone. That report                                             |\n| 24<br>25 | be summarized and categorized and put in<br>Schedule E and in addition, we're working | 24<br>25 | is going to list out all of the payments<br>made during a specific time period. We're |\n\n40 (Pages 154 - 157)\n\n<span id=\"page-41-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                                    |          |                                                                                      |\n|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                            | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                           |\n| 2        | going to review that with our own                                                     | 2        | they paid post-petition pre-petition. Here                                           |\n| 3        | professional knowledge and with the lawyers                                           | 3        | they paid pre-petition, pre-petition but                                             |\n| 4        | to make sure it all makes sense. We might                                             | 4        | should have been excluded from the monthly                                           |\n| 5        | ask questions based on what shows up on the                                           | 5        | operating report. Legitimate charge. It                                              |\n| 6        | spreadsheet but I'm not going to ask for a                                            | 6        | wasn't an overpayment or anything. It just                                           |\n| 7        | copy of the cancelled check, a bank                                                   | 7        | didn't belong reported in the February                                               |\n| 8        | statement or the invoice that was paid. So                                            | 8        | monthly operating report.                                                            |\n| 9        | no investigation of that, just a sanity                                               | 9        | Q.<br>So is it fair to say you later                                                 |\n| 10       | check or a reasonableness check and confer                                            | 10       | received a more detailed breakdown of these                                          |\n| 11       | with counsel to be sure that we understand                                            | 11       | items that was included in this --                                                   |\n| 12       | what's on that sheet and what we're going                                             | 12       | A.<br>I believe we got a more                                                        |\n| 13       | to report.                                                                            | 13       | detailed -- but it was -- it was                                                     |\n| 14       | Q.<br>So essentially, you'll rely on                                                  | 14       | significantly past that time. Everything                                             |\n| 15       | the rolled up numbers that are provided to                                            | 15       | at that time was done by reviewing,                                                  |\n| 16       | you from the individuals we've talked                                                 | 16       | talking, Melissa and Aaron talking with                                              |\n| 17       | about?                                                                                | 17       | whoever and Matt talking to whoever. It                                              |\n| 18       | A.<br>Again, except for some queries                                                  | 18       | was all done by e-mail and orally. We                                                |\n| 19       | that we'll make depending on what the                                                 | 19       | didn't get a spreadsheet of the detail                                               |\n| 20       | information we get. If we get -- if                                                   | 20       | until sometime later, long after it was                                              |\n| 21       | insurance shows up again, we're going to                                              | 21       | filed and actually, after the time that we                                           |\n| 22       | ask insurance on what. If repairs and                                                 | 22       | made available our records that we got --                                            |\n| 23       | maintenance shows up again, we're going to                                            | 23       | the detail listing which is when we figured                                          |\n| 24       | confirm it's not the maid. So we'll use                                               | 24       | out oh we got a problem with the monthly                                             |\n| 25       | some common sense and we'll confer with the                                           | 25       | operating report. It's just a matter of,                                             |\n|          | Page 158                                                                              |          | Page 160                                                                             |\n|          |                                                                                       |          |                                                                                      |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                            | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                           |\n| 2        | lawyers based on what we see but I won't                                              | 2        | you know, whoever is preparing these things                                          |\n| 3        | know what we're going to do until we see                                              | 3        | isn't used to the rules, isn't used to                                               |\n| 4        | what -- and I hope it's soon. What's                                                  | 4        | what's got to be displayed -- disclosed and                                          |\n| 5        | today, April 8th?                                                                     | 5        | what's not going to be disclosed. We try                                             |\n| 6        | Q.<br>Thank you. Okay, just quickly                                                   | 6        | and give them guidance and they just made a                                          |\n| 7        | turning back to Exhibit 8 which is I think                                            | 7        | minor error. We'll fix it next month.                                                |\n| 8        | the final living expense report for the                                               | 8        | Q.<br>Thank you. You can set that                                                    |\n| 9        | period February 15th, 2022 to February                                                | 9        | aside. Do you recall receiving an inquiry                                            |\n| 10       | 28th, 2022. I think you had referenced an                                             | 10       | from someone at U.S. DOJ regarding the                                               |\n| 11       | erroneous amount included in here. Can you                                            | 11       | monthly operating report?                                                            |\n| 12       | just explain again what you meant by that?                                            | 12       | A.<br>I think I actually reached out                                                 |\n| 13       | A.<br>I don't remember exactly what                                                   | 13       | to them first and my reaching out to them                                            |\n| 14       | the number is but on the security line,                                               | 14       | first was -- and that's how -- was -- I                                              |\n| 15       | Line Number 9, the amount referenced her 43                                           | 15       | don't know if anyone's ever prepared a                                               |\n| 16       | thousand dollars. That 43 thousand dollars                                            | 16       | monthly operating report, is there one                                               |\n| 17       | included a payment of -- my memory is                                                 | 17       | here? So the monthly operating report, up                                            |\n| 18       | something like 12 or 14 thousand dollars                                              | 18       | until December 31 or January 31 was one,                                             |\n| 19       | that was paid February 10 and so we got                                               | 19       | two -- these two pages (indicating), Page 8                                          |\n| 20<br>21 | this report, the original one, and didn't<br>know the back -- the background and when | 20<br>21 | which is now Page 8 and Page 9 and there<br>might have been one more -- I thought it |\n| 22       | they -- when they showed us the background                                            | 22       | was five pages. It might have been four.                                             |\n| 23       | and the list of -- we saw February 10. So                                             | 23       | And I filed these monthly operating reports                                          |\n| 24       | we realized we had the opposite mistake of                                            | 24       | in several cases and it had been driving me                                          |\n| 25       | the time with the two professionals where<br>Page 159                                 | 25       | crazy for three months that I would -- I<br>Page 161                                 |\n\n41 (Pages 158 - 161)\n\n<span id=\"page-42-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                                       |          |                                                                                   |\n|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                        |\n| 2        | would -- the way the monthly operating                                                   | 2        | have done anyway's.                                                               |\n| 3        | reports, the bottom, for the first page, it                                              | 3        | Q.<br>We've talked about your                                                     |\n| 4        | allows you to use save if you're inputting                                               | 4        | experience in Chapter 11 individual                                               |\n| 5        | data so that you can review it but it                                                    | 5        | bankruptcies before. Reflecting on your                                           |\n| 6        | retains a watermark up until the time you                                                | 6        | experience in these instances, were any --                                        |\n| 7        | hit a button that says send the data out to                                              | 7        | do you have any -- can you cite any case                                          |\n| 8        | the United States Trustees website and it                                                | 8        | where you've seen such a great disparity                                          |\n| 9        | does whatever it does and when it did that,                                              | 9        | between the debtor's punitive assets and                                          |\n| 10       | it kept on coming back with these extra six                                              | 10       | the stated liabilities?                                                           |\n| 11       | pages and this nonsense (indicating). So I                                               | 11       | A.<br>No. In my individual cases,                                                 |\n| 12       | actually reached out to the U.S. Trustees                                                | 12       | the 373 million dollars of liabilities is                                         |\n| 13       | Office saying what are we doing wrong.                                                   | 13       | the most I've ever seen.                                                          |\n| 14       | It's midnight and we're trying to get this                                               | 14       | MS. ARONSSON: We don't have                                                       |\n| 15       | thing in. He says no, everyone's having the                                              | 15       | anymore questions.                                                                |\n| 16       | same problem. We've just finally figured                                                 | 16       | MR. AULET: I have nothing.                                                        |\n| 17       | out that's what's supposed to happen. So                                                 | 17       | MR. GOLDMAN: I have a few                                                         |\n| 18       | that's when we started talking with him and                                              | 18       | follow-ups. I'll just be a couple                                                 |\n| 19       | then when he saw it, he had our e-mail                                                   | 19       | hours.                                                                            |\n| 20       | addresses and we -- and he was looking for                                               | 20       | THE WITNESS: Beautiful. Do                                                        |\n| 21       | the support for the 161, I believe is what                                               | 21       | you mind if I go get a bottle of                                                  |\n| 22       | he was asking for. I don't have it in                                                    | 22       | scotch?                                                                           |\n| 23       | front of me or if I do, I didn't -- I don't                                              | 23       | MR. GOLDMAN: Get me one too.                                                      |\n| 24       | -- but that's my recollection, that's why                                                | 24       | I'm Irve Goldman --                                                               |\n| 25       | he reached out was to get -- to get that                                                 | 25       | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Can you give                                                    |\n|          |                                                                                          |          |                                                                                   |\n|          | Page 162                                                                                 |          | Page 164                                                                          |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                               | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                        |\n| 2        | and to get the I think accrual of the                                                    | 2        | him the microphone, please?                                                       |\n| 3        | professional fees going forward.                                                         | 3        | MR. AULET: Yes. Can I take us                                                     |\n| 4        | Q.<br>Did you have a call regarding                                                      | 4        | off the record really quick so I can                                              |\n| 5        | the monthly operating report and further                                                 | 5        | --                                                                                |\n| 6        | details on the line items?                                                               | 6        | MR. HARBACH: Sure.                                                                |\n| 7        | A.<br>Not a call. You have whatever                                                      | 7        | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                                                     |\n| 8        | e-mails there were. It was very -- I was                                                 | 8        | 1:56 p.m. and we are off the record.                                              |\n| 9        | very limited. My call to him was a general                                               | 9        | (Whereupon, an off-the-record                                                     |\n| 10       | question on my three cases, I'm trying to                                                | 10       | discussion was held.)                                                             |\n| 11       | file these. He was able to answer my                                                     | 11       | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: The time is                                                     |\n| 12       | question -- my main question. He then,                                                   | 12       | 1:58 p.m. We're back on the record.                                               |\n| 13       | when he saw the monthly operating report,                                                | 13       | You may proceed.                                                                  |\n| 14       | he said hey, I need this and we're going to                                              | 14       | EXAMINATION BY                                                                    |\n| 15       | obviously arrange to do that.                                                            | 15       | MR. GOLDMAN:                                                                      |\n| 16       | Q.<br>So was it the inquiry from the                                                     | 16       | Q.<br>Good afternoon. Irve Goldman,                                               |\n| 17       | trustee that prompted Verdolino and Lowey                                                | 17       | Pullman and Comley for the Creditor's                                             |\n| 18       | to request additional details and                                                        | 18       | Committee. You mentioned you were                                                 |\n| 19       | breakdowns of the line items contained in                                                | 19       | certified as an insolvency restructuring                                          |\n| 20       | the monthly operating Excel that we've                                                   | 20       | expert. Did I get that right?                                                     |\n| 21       | looked at?                                                                               | 21       | A.<br>Advisor.                                                                    |\n| 22       | A.<br>No. We wanted to do that                                                           | 22       | Q.<br>Advisor, for how long?                                                      |\n| 23       | anyway's. That just -- that gave us more                                                 | 23       | A.<br>Well, the actual designation                                                |\n| 24<br>25 | fuel to bring it to them to say hey, we got<br>to get to this. That's something we would | 24<br>25 | came in 1999 but in 1999, when I got the<br>designation, I had to spend over four |\n\n42 (Pages 162 - 165)\n\n<span id=\"page-43-0\"></span>\n\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                  | 1        | C. JALBERT                                          |\n|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------|\n| 2        | thousand hours and have been in the                                         | 2        | and I -- and I regret completely that               |\n| 3        | profession for eight years at that point.                                   | 3        | we were brought in as a financial                   |\n| 4        | So 30 years ago.                                                            | 4        | advisor and not an accountant to the                |\n| 5        | Q.<br>Do you typically call on that                                         | 5        | debtor. Most of what you see on that                |\n| 6        | expertise when you're engaged as a                                          | 6        | motion to employ is very important                  |\n| 7        | professional in Chapter 11 cases?                                           | 7        | stuff in the process of bankruptcy.                 |\n| 8        | A.<br>Certainly some of it, yes.                                            | 8        | The schedules, the SOFA's, the -- the               |\n| 9        | Q.<br>What aspects of the debtor's                                          | 9        | monthly operating reports, tax return               |\n| 10       | financial profile do you view as needing                                    | 10       | preparation, analysis of claims and I               |\n| 11       | restructuring?                                                              | 11       | don't know whether we'll have a role                |\n| 12       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                               | 12       | in that or not. It depends on what                  |\n| 13       | A.<br>Needing restructuring, I don't                                        | 13       | the nature of the claim is. Most of                 |\n| 14       | understand your question.                                                   | 14       | these claims will be legally analyzed               |\n| 15       | Q.<br>Well, you're a certified                                              | 15       | but there might be a hundred reasons                |\n| 16       | insolvency restructuring expert. You call                                   | 16       | why someone that filed a claim --                   |\n| 17       | upon that expertise in your engagements in                                  | 17       | there might be an accounting                        |\n| 18       | Chapter 11 cases. What is it about the                                      | 18       | attached, they do want us to                        |\n| 19       | debtor's financial profile that you view as                                 | 19       | investigate. So we're not brought in                |\n| 20       | in need of restructuring?                                                   | 20       | to -- just because we think there's                 |\n| 21       | A.<br>Well, you know --                                                     | 21       | going to be a reorganization.                       |\n| 22       | MR. AULET: Objection to form.                                               | 22       | Bankruptcy is a process. There's an                 |\n| 23       | Q.<br>Do you view it as in need of                                          | 23       | awful lot of paper that gets pushed                 |\n| 24       | restructuring?                                                              | 24       | by an awful lot of people. This                     |\n| 25       | A.<br>No, I don't.                                                          | 25       | particular debtor is -- as I                        |\n|          | Page 166                                                                    |          | Page 168                                            |\n|          |                                                                             |          |                                                     |\n|          |                                                                             |          |                                                     |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                  | 1        | C. JALBERT                                          |\n| 2        | Q.<br>You don't?                                                            | 2        | understand it, is in excess of 70                   |\n| 3        | A.<br>Absolutely not.                                                       | 3        | years old. Doesn't even have an                     |\n| 4        | Q.<br>So why do you believe he filed                                        | 4        | e-mail address. Doesn't know how to                 |\n| 5        | Chapter 11 then?                                                            | 5        | use computers. Doesn't know                         |\n| 6        | A.<br>Well, the debtor needs                                                | 6        | technology. Couldn't possibly do the                |\n| 7        | restructuring. I don't think --                                             | 7        | monthly operating reports himself and               |\n| 8        | (Whereupon, a cell phone rang.)                                             | 8        | virtually, in every case, there's an                |\n| 9        | THE WITNESS: Oh, I apologize.                                               | 9        | accountant that does tax returns.                   |\n| 10       | That was for me to remind me to do                                          | 10       | There's an accountant that does --                  |\n| 11       | something at 2:00 which I can't                                             | 11       | that helps with preparing monthly                   |\n| 12       | remember what I'm supposed to do.                                           | 12       | operating reports. Even when the                    |\n| 13       | Just making sure it wasn't on -- what                                       | 13       | company has a controller, we still                  |\n| 14       | is that when it comes back on later                                         | 14       | come in in cases where -- so there                  |\n| 15       | and it annoys you? The debtor's                                             | 15       | may not be a reorganization as of                   |\n| 16       | restructuring, if you're referring to                                       | 16       | right now. There's going to be a                    |\n| 17       | the questions were brought up -- in                                         | 17       | plan someday. I don't know what role                |\n| 18       | an ordinary Chapter 11 case that's a                                        | 18       | we're going to play but if we need to               |\n| 19       | business, there's lots of things to                                         | 19       | be -- if the counsel and debtor needs               |\n| 20       | consider if there's a real                                                  | 20       | us to play a role, we will but until                |\n| 21       | restructuring. You've got to                                                | 21       | that day, there's lots of necessary                 |\n| 22       | restructure the debt, the secure                                            | 22       | work to do in the ordinary course of                |\n| 23       | debt. Maybe mezzanine, unsecured                                            | 23       | the process in the life of a Chapter                |\n| 24<br>25 | debt. Maybe work with payables, all<br>sorts of -- that isn't the case here | 24<br>25 | 11 case here.<br>Q.<br>What you just described were |\n\n43 (Pages 166 - 169)\n\n<span id=\"page-44-0\"></span>\n\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                            |\n|--------|---------------------------------------------|----|-------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2      | menial tasks of accounting?                 | 2  | counsel wants us to play and the debtor               |\n| 3      | A.<br>I disagree.                           | 3  | wants us to play. If they want us to play             |\n| 4      | Q.<br>No, you disagree?                     | 4  | part of the role of looking at the                    |\n| 5      | A.<br>Preparing the SOFA's and              | 5  | pre-petition payments, which we ordinarily            |\n| 6      | preparing the MOR's, you think that's all   | 6  | do in most of the cases we do, we come up             |\n| 7      | menial tasks?                               | 7  | with the list, here it already exists. We             |\n| 8      | Q.<br>All right, I won't argue with         | 8  | might ask for support to confirm but it's             |\n| 9      | you on that. What is it about this case     | 9  | entirely up to the team that's running the            |\n| 10     | that you -- you view that is in need of     | 10 | case. We're not running the case. We're               |\n| 11     | restructuring, if anything?                 | 11 | -- we're -- I think we're an important                |\n| 12     | MR. AULET: Objection to form.               | 12 | member of the team but we're not -- the               |\n| 13     | A.<br>Yeah, I don't know what you're        | 13 | accounting firm is not driving the case.              |\n| 14     | trying to ask.                              | 14 | The debtor and his counsel is driving the             |\n| 15     | Q.<br>Are there assets that need to         | 15 | case as is true of every case.                        |\n| 16     | be restructured?                            | 16 | Q.<br>Do you know where the debtor's                  |\n| 17     | A.<br>The only assets I understand          | 17 | books and records reside?                             |\n| 18     | are -- I think the lawyers call them        | 18 | A.<br>I do not.                                       |\n| 19     | litigation assets in the like.              | 19 | Q.<br>Do you know if the debtor had a                 |\n| 20     | Q.<br>So how would they be                  | 20 | pre-petition account?                                 |\n| 21     | restructured or part of a restructuring?    | 21 | A.<br>Only from knowledge from                        |\n| 22     | MR. AULET: Objection to form.               | 22 | lawyers.                                              |\n| 23     | A.<br>You're probably asking the            | 23 | Q.<br>Who was the accountant?                         |\n| 24     | wrong guy but if there's ongoing            | 24 | A.<br>Accountant?                                     |\n| 25     | litigation, I suspect there's going to be   | 25 | Q.<br>Yeah, I asked you --                            |\n|        | Page 170                                    |    | Page 172                                              |\n|        |                                             |    |                                                       |\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                  | 1  | C. JALBERT                                            |\n| 2      | -- you would hope there would be settlement | 2  | A.<br>Oh actually, I take that back.                  |\n| 3      | negotiations, there might be mediation,     | 3  | I saw actual tax returns. There was --                |\n| 4<br>5 | there might be arbitration. Someone's       | 4  | every preparer has to list their name on a            |\n|        | going to try and liquidate those assets     |    |                                                       |\n|        |                                             | 5  | tax return they prepare. So there was --              |\n| 6      | into cash with which to pay the creditors.  | 6  | someone paid tax returns at least. What               |\n| 7      | I don't know whether we'll play a part in   | 7  | else they did, I don't know.                          |\n| 8      | that or not.                                | 8  | Q.<br>Okay, what was the name of the                  |\n| 9      | Q.<br>As part of your -- the scope of       | 9  | accountant?                                           |\n| 10     | your engagement, there is a bullet point    | 10 | A.<br>I don't remember.                               |\n| 11     | that states that you're going to provide    | 11 | Q.<br>Have the tax returns been                       |\n| 12     | assistance --                               | 12 | produced to any party in the case thus far?           |\n| 13     | THE COURT REPORTER: I'm sorry,              | 13 | A.<br>I imagine we produced them                      |\n| 14     | Counsel. I need to hear you better.         | 14 | because we had them. They would have come             |\n| 15     | Q.<br>Provide assistance with               | 15 | in an e-mail. So they would have been                 |\n| 16     | reviewing debtor books and records for      | 16 | produced as it relates to this I think. I             |\n| 17     | possibly avoidable transactions such as     | 17 | think they were but they were very small              |\n| 18     | preference and fraudulent transfer claims.  | 18 | tax returns prepared by -- I assume a New             |\n| 19     | You stated that you did not review any of   | 19 | York or a Connecticut accountant. I don't             |\n| 20     | the debtor's books and records, correct?    | 20 | know who.                                             |\n| 21     | A.<br>Currently, so far, yes.               | 21 | Q.<br>You just don't -- you obviously                 |\n| 22     | Q.<br>Did you ask for any?                  | 22 | looked at it, you just don't recall the               |\n| 23     | A.<br>No.                                   | 23 | name of that accountant right now?                    |\n| 24     | Q.<br>Do you intend to?                     | 24 | A.<br>I don't -- well, yes. I'm not                   |\n| 25     | A.<br>Depends on what role the<br>Page 171  | 25 | even sure if I looked at it. I don't know<br>Page 173 |\n\n85\n\n44 (Pages 170 - 173)\n\n<span id=\"page-45-0\"></span>Case 22-50073 Doc 404-26 Filed 05/20/22 Entered 05/20/22 11:52:18 Page 46 of\n\n|          | 85                                                                                      |          |                                                                 |\n|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                              | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                      |\n| 2        | if, at the time when we were trying to do                                               | 2        | I don't know.                                                   |\n| 3        | everything, we were using those because we                                              | 3        | Q.<br>What information, if any, did                             |\n| 4        | needed some of the information on there.                                                | 4        | you rely on in getting comfortable taking                       |\n| 5        | We were referred to them by Melissa for                                                 | 5        | this case without a post-petition retainer?                     |\n| 6        | certain issues that the lawyers thought                                                 | 6        | A.<br>I've been doing this for 35                               |\n| 7        | were important and we went and took a look                                              | 7        | years. I'm not sure. I don't remember                           |\n| 8        | at them but I would have looked at                                                      | 8        | ever getting a post-petition retainer but                       |\n| 9        | something besides the name of the preparer.                                             | 9        | my firm works with --                                           |\n| 10       | At the time, it didn't matter.                                                          | 10       | (Whereupon, a cellphone rang.)                                  |\n| 11       | Q.<br>Have you ever spoken to the                                                       | 11       | THE WITNESS: Shit, I'm sorry.                                   |\n| 12       | debtor?                                                                                 | 12       | Now it's off. We -- we're a                                     |\n| 13       | A.<br>Yes.                                                                              | 13       | practitioner in Massachusetts and we                            |\n| 14       | Q.<br>When?                                                                             | 14       | do cases in Delaware, New York,                                 |\n| 15       | A.<br>Wednesday at the 341 hearing to                                                   | 15       | Connecticut, Rhode Island,                                      |\n| 16       | introduce myself.                                                                       | 16       | Massachusetts, New Hampshire,                                   |\n| 17       | Q.<br>Is that the only occasion, to                                                     | 17       | Vermont, Maine. We represent Chapter                            |\n| 18       | your knowledge, that you've spoken to the                                               | 18       | 7 trustees in virtually all of those                            |\n| 19       | debtor?                                                                                 | 19       | states. We probably represent and do                            |\n| 20       | A.<br>I don't speak Mandarin and he                                                     | 20       | work for virtually ever Chapter 7                               |\n| 21       | apparently doesn't speak English. So I                                                  | 21       | trustee in Rhode Island, every                                  |\n| 22       | have not spoken to him. Or Chinese. I'm                                                 | 22       | Chapter 7 trustee in Massachusetts, a                           |\n| 23       | not sure which it is. Excuse me.                                                        | 23       | couple in Maine, a couple in New                                |\n| 24       | Q.<br>You did not receive a                                                             | 24       | Hampshire and it's not unheard of for                           |\n| 25       | post-petition retainer, correct?                                                        | 25       | us to go and do 50, 60, 70, 80                                  |\n|          |                                                                                         |          |                                                                 |\n|          | Page 174                                                                                |          | Page 176                                                        |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                              | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                      |\n| 2        | A.<br>Correct.                                                                          | 2        | thousand dollars of work before we                              |\n| 3        | Q.<br>Are you confident that your                                                       | 3        | even know the case will ever have any                           |\n| 4        | fees will be paid?                                                                      | 4        | money. It's an investment that we                               |\n| 5        | A.<br>I don't know if I'm confident.                                                    | 5        | make. Now I didn't make an                                      |\n| 6        | I'm hoping.                                                                             | 6        | investment in this case. Whatever we                            |\n| 7        | Q.<br>What source do you believe your                                                   | 7        | incurred -- and I don't know what                               |\n| 8        | fees will be paid, from what source?                                                    | 8        | that is, I'm hoping I'm going to                                |\n| 9        | A.<br>It will come from the Estate.                                                     | 9        | collect it but if I don't, then I'll                            |\n| 10       | If we're going to be paid, as I understand                                              | 10       | have a write-off like I've had many,                            |\n| 11       | it, it will come from the Estate. I don't                                               | 11       | many, many, many times in the past.                             |\n| 12       | -- I have not thought of or have any                                                    | 12       | Q.<br>Again, I don't think you                                  |\n| 13       | agreement on any other source of payment.                                               | 13       | answered my question.                                           |\n| 14       | Q.<br>Do you mean the litigation                                                        | 14       | A.<br>Oh all right --                                           |\n| 15       | claims or recoveries?                                                                   | 15       | Q.<br>If you -- if you relied just on                           |\n| 16       | A.<br>I would expect the only people                                                    | 16       | your experience in engagements in                               |\n| 17       | that have a retainer in this case are Brown                                             | 17       | bankruptcy cases and that's it for taking                       |\n| 18       | Rudnick. Everybody else will be looking to                                              | 18       | this case without a pre or post-petition                        |\n| 19       | be paid -- that is a debtor's professional                                              | 19       | retainer, is that what you mean --                              |\n| 20       | or a committee professional, professionals                                              | 20       | A.<br>I don't understand your                                   |\n| 21       | that file an application with the Court and                                             | 21       | question.                                                       |\n| 22       | the Court allows their retention will be                                                | 22       | Q.<br>What information, if any, did                             |\n| 23       | looking to get funds. We're all going to                                                | 23       | you rely on in taking this case without a                       |\n| 24<br>25 | be looking from the same place. What that<br>source is going to be, if it will ever be, | 24<br>25 | pre or post-petition retainer?<br>MR. AULET: Objection to form. |\n\n45 (Pages 174 - 177)\n\n<span id=\"page-46-0\"></span>\n\n|          | 85                                                                               |          |                                                                                     |  |  |\n|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                       | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |  |  |\n| 2        | A.<br>I do work with lots and lots of                                            | 2        | engagement?                                                                         |  |  |\n| 3        | attorneys and when attorneys call up and                                         | 3        | A.<br>Absolutely not.                                                               |  |  |\n| 4        | they ask if we're interested on working on                                       | 4        | Q.<br>Have you had any communications                                               |  |  |\n| 5        | the case, I work on the case.                                                    | 5        | with any representative from Golden Hill?                                           |  |  |\n| 6        | Q.<br>So you relied on being asked to                                            | 6        | MR. HARBACH: Golden Spring.                                                         |  |  |\n| 7        | get involved by Brown Rudnick?                                                   | 7        | Q.<br>Golden Spring.                                                                |  |  |\n| 8        | A.<br>Yep.                                                                       | 8        | A.<br>I was on e-mails with someone                                                 |  |  |\n| 9        | Q.<br>That's it?                                                                 | 9        | from -- well, first of all, Melissa Francis                                         |  |  |\n| 10       | A.<br>Yep, and then after that, it's                                             | 10       | has a Golden Spring e-mail address. She's                                           |  |  |\n| 11       | bankruptcy process. Whatever happens,                                            | 11       | counsel to the debtor. I've been informed                                           |  |  |\n| 12       | happens.                                                                         | 12       | of that from the beginning. The only other                                          |  |  |\n| 13       | Q.<br>You didn't look at the                                                     | 13       | contact --                                                                          |  |  |\n| 14       | financial profile of this debtor at all in                                       | 14       | Q.<br>She's counsel for the debtor or                                               |  |  |\n| 15       | determining --                                                                   | 15       | Golden Spring?                                                                      |  |  |\n| 16       | A.<br>I think -- I think I knew he                                               | 16       | A.<br>Debtor.                                                                       |  |  |\n| 17       | had limited assets or no assets and I think                                      | 17       | Q.<br>Melissa --                                                                    |  |  |\n| 18       | I knew he had a lot of litigation ongoing                                        | 18       | A.<br>Francis.                                                                      |  |  |\n| 19       | but -- maybe I'm a fool but I only have one                                      | 19       | Q.<br>But she has an e-mail address                                                 |  |  |\n| 20       | other person that I have to answer to and                                        | 20       | from Golden Spring?                                                                 |  |  |\n| 21       | he lets me run my business just like he                                          | 21       | A.<br>Correct. They were in all of                                                  |  |  |\n| 22       | runs his business and my feeling is when a                                       | 22       | these e-mails that they were putting in                                             |  |  |\n| 23       | lawyer calls up and they have a case, then                                       | 23       | front of me.                                                                        |  |  |\n| 24       | we respond because if I don't respond,                                           | 24       | Q.<br>She's counsel for the debtor is                                               |  |  |\n| 25       | maybe the next time he calls another<br>Page 178                                 | 25       | your understanding --<br>Page 180                                                   |  |  |\n|          |                                                                                  |          |                                                                                     |  |  |\n|          |                                                                                  |          |                                                                                     |  |  |\n| 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                       | 1        | C. JALBERT                                                                          |  |  |\n| 2        | accountant. So I didn't do all the things                                        | 2        | A.<br>I've been told emphatically by                                                |  |  |\n| 3        | that you think a normal person should have                                       | 3        | her and by Brown Rudnick that she is                                                |  |  |\n| 4        | done to protect themselves on payment.                                           | 4        | counsel to the debtor, as is Aaron                                                  |  |  |\n| 5        | Q.<br>Did you rely on any degree on                                              | 5        | Mitchell. As is Brown Rudnick.                                                      |  |  |\n| 6        | the financial profile of Golden Spring?                                          | 6        | Q.<br>Okay. Are they part of the                                                    |  |  |\n| 7        | A.<br>No.                                                                        | 7        | application to retain ordinary course                                               |  |  |\n| 8        | Q.<br>You didn't do any due diligence                                            | 8        | professionals, if you know?                                                         |  |  |\n| 9        | on Golden Spring before agreeing to get                                          | 9        | A.<br>I don't know that they're going                                               |  |  |\n| 10       | engaged in this case?                                                            | 10       | to be paid by the Estate or not. I don't                                            |  |  |\n| 11       | A.<br>I'm pretty sure I didn't know                                              | 11       | know what they're -- what they're -- what                                           |  |  |\n| 12       | Golden Spring existed by the time I agreed                                       | 12       | motions they filed to be paid. I'm not --                                           |  |  |\n| 13<br>14 | to be in this case.<br>Q.<br>How about Lamp Capital, did you                     | 13<br>14 | I'm not representing them and I'm not<br>asking them.                               |  |  |\n| 15       | do any investigation of Lamp Capital?                                            | 15       | Q.<br>So back to the question whether                                               |  |  |\n| 16       | A.<br>No.                                                                        | 16       | you had any communications with Golden                                              |  |  |\n| 17       | Q.<br>Did you ask any questions about                                            | 17       | Spring --                                                                           |  |  |\n| 18       | what the financial profile of those two                                          | 18       | A.<br>So my colleague, Matt Flynn,                                                  |  |  |\n| 19       | entities was --                                                                  | 19       | had I think one or two phone calls with                                             |  |  |\n| 20       | A.<br>No.                                                                        | 20       | someone at Golden Spring. There was a                                               |  |  |\n| 21       | Q.<br>-- before getting involved?                                                | 21       | number of e-mails which we looked at in                                             |  |  |\n| 22       | A.<br>No.                                                                        | 22       | here and you know, 6, 7, 8, 9, whatever,                                            |  |  |\n| 23       | Q.<br>Were you promised that you                                                 | 23       | that person is not identified but I did not                                         |  |  |\n| 24<br>25 | would be paid from Golden Hill or Lamp<br>Capital before agreeing to take on the | 24<br>25 | speak to that person. I had -- I was on<br>the e-mail exchanges and I wrote exactly |  |  |\n\n46 (Pages 178 - 181)\n\n<span id=\"page-47-0\"></span>\n\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                             | 1      | C. JALBERT                                                      |\n|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2      | one e-mail to that person and actually                 | 2      | for the month of which two-thirds of that                       |\n| 3      | directed it to Melissa and Aaron when I                | 3      | is security.                                                    |\n| 4      | wrote my e-mail.                                       | 4      | Q.<br>Is the person or entity that is                           |\n| 5      | Q.<br>Do you know why that person's                    | 5      | funding the post-petition living expenses                       |\n| 6      | name is redacted on the exhibit?                       | 6      | Golden Spring?                                                  |\n| 7      | A.<br>Yes.                                             | 7      | A.<br>I don't know. That's not one                              |\n| 8      | Q.<br>Why?                                             | 8      | of the questions and no one has volunteered                     |\n| 9      | A.<br>Because you heard Golden                         | 9      | that information. It just says -- the                           |\n| 10     | Spring's attorney. They're worried about               | 10     | question says is there a third-party making                     |\n| 11     | the safety of their employees given the                | 11     | payments on behalf of the debtor                                |\n| 12     | issues surrounding this case. I don't know             | 12     | post-petition. We answered that question                        |\n| 13     | anything about that. I'm just doing what I             | 13     | as best we could. We'll fix the one error                       |\n| 14     | told. I am not disclosing the name.                    | 14     | that remains but it did not ask and they                        |\n| 15     | Q.<br>It was at Golden Spring's                        | 15     | did not tell us, to my knowledge, who is                        |\n| 16     | counsel's behest that that was redacted is             | 16     | making the disbursements.                                       |\n| 17     | your understanding?                                    | 17     | Q.<br>And you didn't ask?                                       |\n| 18     | A.<br>Well, I don't know whether it                    | 18     | A.<br>No. I don't know how it would                             |\n| 19     | was Golden Spring's counsel or Golden                  | 19     | affect -- it's not in the monthly operating                     |\n| 20     | Spring itself. I don't know -- I don't                 | 20     | report so it's none of my business I think                      |\n| 21     | know who started it. I just -- in fact, I              | 21     | is what I would have been told.                                 |\n| 22     | don't think I knew it until the day before             | 22     | MR. GOLDMAN: I don't have any                                   |\n| 23     | -- the day before, maybe Wednesday is when             | 23     | further questions.                                              |\n| 24     | I found out that -- that -- that the                   | 24     | MR. AULET: I have nothing.                                      |\n| 25     | documents were redacted.                               | 25     | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: Can I take                                    |\n|        | Page 182                                               |        | Page 184                                                        |\n|        |                                                        |        |                                                                 |\n|        |                                                        |        |                                                                 |\n| 1      | C. JALBERT                                             | 1      | C. JALBERT                                                      |\n| 2      | Q.<br>Is it your understanding that,                   | 2      | us off the record for the day?                                  |\n| 3      | according to the debtor, all of his living             | 3      | MR. GOLDMAN: Yes.                                               |\n| 4<br>5 | expenses, pre-petition, were paid by Golden<br>Spring? | 4<br>5 | THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're off<br>the record at 2:18 p.m. and this |\n| 6      | A.<br>Well, they were paid by                          | 6      | concludes today's testimony given by                            |\n| 7      | somebody else. I can't say emphatically                | 7      | Craig Jalbert.                                                  |\n| 8      | they were paid by Golden Spring.                       | 8      | (Whereupon, at 2:18 P.M., the                                   |\n| 9      | Q.<br>So whatever that person or                       | 9      | Examination of this witness was                                 |\n| 10     | entity -- whoever that person or entity                | 10     | concluded.)                                                     |\n| 11     | was, are the living expenses, post-petition            | 11     |                                                                 |\n| 12     | living expenses that were prepared in the              | 12     | °<br>°<br>°<br>°                                                |\n| 13     | various schedules, consistent with what was            | 13     |                                                                 |\n| 14     | paid pre-petition?                                     | 14     |                                                                 |\n| 15     | A.<br>We didn't do an investigation                    | 15     |                                                                 |\n| 16     | as to what the pre-petition nature of                  | 16     |                                                                 |\n| 17     | payments or amount of the payments or                  | 17     |                                                                 |\n| 18     | anything. So I don't have any -- any                   | 18     |                                                                 |\n| 19     | comparative information. That information              | 19     |                                                                 |\n| 20     | will be developed as we see the months go              | 20     |                                                                 |\n| 21     | by but I think the final -- the final                  | 21     |                                                                 |\n| 22     | number for 15 days of the expenses for the             | 22     |                                                                 |\n| 23     | individual ended up being something like 28            | 23     |                                                                 |\n| 24     | or 29 thousand dollars for 15 days. So                 | 24     |                                                                 |\n| 25     | multiply that by two 60 thousand dollars<br>Page 183   | 25     | Page 185                                                        |\n\n47 (Pages 182 - 185)\n\n<span id=\"page-48-0\"></span>\n\n| 1<br>2<br>D E C L A R A T I O N<br>3<br>4<br>I hereby certify that having been<br>5<br>first duly sworn to testify to the truth, I<br>6<br>gave the above testimony.<br>7<br>8<br>I FURTHER CERTIFY that the foregoing<br>9<br>transcript is a true and correct transcript<br>10<br>of the testimony given by me at the time<br>11<br>and place specified hereinbefore.<br>12<br>13<br>14                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | 1<br>2<br>C E R T I F I C A T E<br>3<br>STATE OF NEW YORK<br>)<br>4<br>: SS.:<br>COUNTY OF KINGS<br>)<br>5<br>6<br>I, LENAYA LYNCH, a Notary Public for<br>7<br>and within the State of New York, do hereby<br>8<br>certify:<br>9<br>That the witness whose examination is<br>10<br>hereinbefore set forth was duly sworn and<br>11<br>that such examination is a true record of<br>12<br>the testimony given by that witness.<br>13<br>I further certify that I am not |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| _________________________<br>15<br>CRAIG JALBERT<br>16<br>17<br>18<br>Subscribed and sworn to before me<br>19<br>this _____ day of ________________ 20___.<br>20<br>21<br>_________________________<br>22<br>NOTARY PUBLIC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 14<br>related to any of the parties to this<br>15<br>action by blood or by marriage and that I<br>16<br>am in no way interested in the outcome of<br>17<br>this matter.<br>18<br>IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto<br>19<br>set my hand this 8th day of April 2022.<br>20<br>21<br><%24350,Signature%><br>LENAYA LYNCH<br>22                                                                                                                                          |\n| 23<br>24<br>25<br>Page 186                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | 23<br>24<br>25<br>Page 188                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |\n| 1<br>2<br>E X H I B I T S<br>3 JALBERT EXHIBITS<br>EXHIBIT EXHIBIT<br>PAGE<br>4 NUMBER<br>DESCRIPTION<br>5 Exhibit 1 Notice of Deposition<br>10<br>6 Exhibit 2 E-mail Chain<br>32<br>7 Exhibit 3 E-mail Chain<br>35<br>8 Exhibit 4 Debtor's Application<br>47<br>9 Exhibit 5 Official Form 106Sum<br>93<br>10 Exhibit 6 Global Notes<br>111<br>11 Exhibit 7 E-mail Chain<br>129<br>12 Exhibit 8 E-mail Chain<br>131<br>13 Exhibit 9 E-mail Chain<br>139<br>14 Exhibit 10 E-mail Chain<br>147<br>15<br>(Exhibits retained by Court Reporter.)<br>16<br>17<br>I N D E X<br>18 EXAMINATION BY<br>PAGE<br>19 MS. ARONSSON<br>5<br>MR. HARBACH<br>100<br>20 MS. ARONSSON<br>103<br>MR. HARBACH<br>153<br>21 MS. ARONSSON<br>154<br>MR. GOLDMAN<br>165<br>22<br>23<br>24 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |\n| 25<br>Page 187                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |\n\n48 (Pages 186 - 188)\n\n[& - 373]\n\n| &                                   | 86:10,22,24           | 132:20 134:13<br>161       | 24350<br>188:21            |\n|-------------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------|\n| દિદ<br>1:15,18 2:3,12               | 103:13 115:4,4,8      | 135:13,17 140:18           | 26<br>120:3,12             |\n| 0                                   | 119:21 124:25         | 162:21                     | 28<br>183:23               |\n|                                     | 164:4 166:7,18        | 132:23<br>161,323          | 28th 72:9 129:23           |\n| 0001646<br>32:16                    | 167:5,18 169:24       | 133:5                      | 133:12 134:3               |\n| 00001649<br>35:10                   | 111 187:10            | ી રિટ<br>187:21            | 140:14 152:23              |\n| 00001684<br>140:8                   | 11:53 90:21           | 16th<br>132:17             | 154:21 155:11              |\n| 00001691<br>147:17                  | 2:18 34:22<br>12      | 119:19,21<br>17            | 159:10                     |\n| 00001752<br>129:3                   | 85:15 159:18          | 18<br>48:22 127:22         | 29<br>183:24               |\n| 02035<br>6:9                        | 75:21 131:25<br>120   | 19<br>131:3                | 2:00<br>167:11             |\n| 06103<br>2:18                       | 120-1 131:25          | 19,488 125:6,15            | 2:18<br>185:5,8            |\n| 2:14<br>06601                       | 132:6                 | 17:5<br>1979               | 3                          |\n| 1                                   | 125:3,14,19<br>122b   | 17:8<br>1983               | 23:23 35:8,12<br>3         |\n| 3:16 10:14.17<br>1                  | 124<br>6:8            | 1987<br>17:10              | 96:25 97:4,8,13,24         |\n| 17:10 23:22 72:10                   | 129<br>187:11         | 1999<br>165:24,24          | 115:13 116:21              |\n| 97:9 113:14.18                      | 12:22 90:25           | 1:22<br>139:21             | 144:12 187:7               |\n| 114:14 118:3                        | 19:8 42:12<br>13      | 1:28<br>140:4              | 3,850 96:5                 |\n| 132:21 151:14                       | 55:14 103:14          | 1:56<br>165:8              | 30                         |\n| 155:17 157:6                        | 126:5 146:19          | 1:58<br>165:12             | 7:5,19 11:2,22             |\n| 187:5                               | 152:7 153:14          | 1 a<br>94:19,22 95:8       | 107:6 144:4,6,14           |\n| 133:25 147:10<br>10                 | 154:11                | 95:11<br>1 b               | 145:11 146:4,11<br>166:4   |\n| 147:15 159:19,23                    | 13,611 152:8          | 2                          | 30th<br>2:4                |\n| 187:5,14                            | 153:15,20             | 2<br>23:22 32:14,18        | 31<br>17:10 72:10          |\n| 100 2:18 142:15,18                  | 187:12<br>131         | 33:2,4 41:6 97:13          | 74:24 77:7 121:16          |\n| 143:8 187:19                        | 139<br>187:13         | 105:21 142:14              | 155:17,18 161:18           |\n| 10036<br>1:19 2:5,10                | 14<br>19:8 98:7 146:7 | 148:3 152:8 187:6          | 161:18                     |\n| 100th<br>44:7                       | 159:18                |                            |                            |\n|                                     |                       |                            |                            |\n| 6:9<br>101                          | 147<br>187:14         | 154:13<br>2.5              | 32<br>187:6                |\n| 103<br>187:20                       | 15<br>77:6 89:10      | 20<br>45:8 186:19          | 341<br>16:17,22 45:13      |\n| 106a 94:21                          | 97:25 145:4           | 2019<br>79:18              | 45:14,17 46:14,15          |\n| 106sum 93:14                        | 183:22,24             | 2020<br>79:19              | 46:19,24 47:8,12           |\n| 94:2 187:9                          | 187:20<br>ી રેઝે      | 2021<br>127:24             | 47:13,18 51:15             |\n| 109 132:22 135:18                   | 187:21<br>154         | 2022<br>1:10 3:5           | 69:5 116:2 123:15          |\n| 140:17                              | 15th 63:14 72:9       | 125:4 159:9,10             | 123:18 126:13              |\n| 109,827 133:7                       | 125:4 129:23          | 188:19                     | 127:10,18 174:15           |\n|                                     | 133:11 134:3          | 21 45:8 49:9 84:9          | 342<br>16:16               |\n| 109,827.12 132:13<br>10:17 1:11 3:4 | 140:14 152:23         | 92:21 107:14<br>45.9<br>22 | 17:13 176:6<br>35<br>187:7 |\n| 10:24<br>11:15,19                   | 154:21 155:11         | 22-50073 1:63:22           |                            |\n| 11 1:5 21:2,4                       | ી રેતે-વે             | 22nd 3:4                   | 36 95:13 96:2,4,8          |\n| 32:11 55:3 70:3                     | 96:18 105:18<br>16    | 23                         | 96:16<br>373               |\n| 74:19 81:6,11                       | 126:5                 | 97:8                       | 113:19 164:12              |\n\n[4 - advisor]\n\n| 4                                         | 95:17,19,24<br>61     | ਰਤੋ<br>187:9                        | 172:24 173:9.19      |\n|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------------|\n| 47:24 48:3 91:4<br>ব                      | 62<br>95:15,16,17     | 2                                   | 173:23 179:2         |\n| 96:9,12,17 97:13                          | 6:49<br>39:10         | 1:11 3:4<br>a.m.                    | accountants 21:5     |\n| 107:14 108:8                              | 108:8 130:23<br>6e    | 11:15,19 90:21                      | 21:6,7,8             |\n| 113:13 117:4                              | 7                     | aaron 25:17,19,25                   | accounting 22:21     |\n| 119:4 130:23                              | 7<br>1:18 2:4,9 81:6  | 26:10 31:4,7 32:9                   | 63:21 168:17         |\n| 144:20 187:8                              | 86:25 95:18           | 56:18 57:3 59:3,4                   | 170:2 172:13         |\n| 7:18 138:18<br>40                         | 103:12 119:16,21      | 59:10,18 99:2,7                     | accounts 69:21,22    |\n| 142:16                                    | 128:24 129:11         | 102:11 103:17                       | accrual 70:20        |\n| 43<br>159:15,16                           | 133:16 135:14         | 104:12,16 105:3                     | 156:4,9,17,19        |\n| 43,655.44.<br>138:16                      | 136:18 141:17         | 105:13 106:7                        | 163:2                |\n| 45<br>72:11                               | 142:16 144:14         | 109:24 110:18                       | 156:25<br>accruals   |\n| 47<br>187:8                               | 176:18,20,22          | 112:15 124:2                        | 69:2<br>accrue       |\n|                                           | 181:22 187:11         | 129:18 135:23                       | accrued 78:23,25     |\n| 5                                         | 70<br>6:19 7:16 169:2 | 139:8 143:14                        | 79:6                 |\n| റ<br>93:12,15 108:8                       | 176:25                | 156:3 157:15                        | 10:6<br>accurate     |\n| 117:4 130:23                              | 7006<br>2:14          | 160:16 181:4                        | 136:11,12            |\n| 187:9,19                                  | 77<br>100:20 111:6    | 182:3                               | 10:2.9<br>accurately |\n| 50<br>6:19 7:14,18                        | 78<br>93:19           |                                     | 136:24               |\n| 118:13 141:9,10                           |                       | ability 9:25 10:5<br>able 53:7 78:6 | accustomed 53:9      |\n| 141:14 142:7,8,9                          | 8                     | 79:11 136:13                        | 19:15<br>act         |\n| 142:12 144:13                             | 8<br>1:10 119:21      | 138:3 144:25                        | 4:8 188:15<br>action |\n| 145:11 176:25                             | 120:3 131:16,21       |                                     | activity 63:22       |\n| 21:3 126:6<br>500                         | 134:7 135:11,18       | 163:11                              | 80:12                |\n| રેન્ડર<br>75:13,17 76:2                   | 149:25 150:9          | absolutely 82:6                     | actual<br>109:17     |\n| 505b<br>75:5                              | 159:7 161:19,20       | 167:3 180:3                         | 137:7 165:23         |\n| 50th<br>44:6                              | 181:22 187:12         | abundance 132:20                    | 173:3                |\n| 51.495.67<br>140:17                       | 7:16 176:25<br>80     | 142:21                              | 85:21 140:16<br>add  |\n| 53<br>122:11                              | 83<br>17:9            | 102:23<br>accepted                  | addition<br>155:25   |\n| 94:22 95:23<br>રેરે                       | 2:13<br>850           | access 115:23                       | additional 163:18    |\n| 56<br>95:17,19                            | 87<br>17:10           | 119:6 124:16                        | address 6:6,7,8      |\n| રજ<br>95:24 96:2                          | 8th<br>3:5 127:24     | accidently 125:13                   | 169:4 180:10,19      |\n| 6                                         | 159:5 188:19          | account 37:25                       | addresses<br>162:20  |\n|                                           | 9                     | 38:24 52:15 63:19                   | administer 4:6       |\n| 7:5 11:2,8,21,22<br>6<br>97:24 98:7 111:4 |                       | 64:17 65:3 66:19                    | administrative       |\n| 111:8 117:5                               | 0<br>119:21 139:24    | 72:6991:6,8 92:11                   | 77:17 78:7,10        |\n|                                           | 140:7 146:20          | 92:16 147:2                         | 81:8                 |\n| 119:16,18,21                              | 150:10 159:15         | 172:20                              | advising 22:20       |\n| 181:22 187:10                             | 161:20 181:22         | accountancy<br>17:8                 | 53:261:11            |\n| 6:19 7:14 75:11<br>60 -                   | 187:13                | accountant 18:16                    | advisor 17:24 18:7   |\n| 75:19 176:25                              | 48:10 82:17<br>90     | 70:22 80:6 168:4                    | 21:5,6 34:7 36:23    |\n| 183:25                                    | 83:22 92:23           | 169:9,10 172:23                     |                      |\n\n85\n\n#### [advisor - aronsson]\n\n| 37:7 39:8 40:20       | allocations 145:25   | 121:17 122:12       | applicable<br>107:11 |\n|-----------------------|----------------------|---------------------|----------------------|\n| 41:20 43:2 48:9       | allow 12:20 38:23    | 130:21 148:21,23    | application 48:2,7   |\n| 48:21 49:5 70:22      | 65:2 87:11           | 151:18 163:11       | 48:18 49:2 175:21    |\n| 165:21,22 168:4       | allowed 80:12        | 178:20              | 181:7 187:8          |\n| advisors 62:4.5       | 81:20                | answered 34:20      | applies 53:17,22     |\n| affairs 14:6 55:20    | allows 82:15,17      | 148:25 149:4        | 103:22               |\n| 111:18 112:5          | 162:4 175:22         | 177:13 184:12       | apply 118:2          |\n| affect 184:19         | amend 89:7 125:3     | 8:5,23<br>answers   | appointed 22:13      |\n| affidavit 48:25       | amended 125:19       | 130:20              | appreciate 35:4      |\n| 49:7                  | amendment 60:7       | anticipate 47:16    | approach 22:20       |\n| affiliated 42:3       | amendments           | 50:19 52:9 54:16    | appropriate 73:14    |\n| affiliations 4:13     | 55:21 112:6          | 55:6 59:25 61:19    | 113:8 114:7 153:9    |\n| 165:16<br>afternoon   | amount 13:9          | 61:21 63:25 67:16   | approval 70:16       |\n| agent   90:2 91:7,20  | 81:22 96:5 118:12    | 76:4,24 79:21       | approved 62:10       |\n| 91:21,24              | 133:8.9 134:17       | 106:15 157:13,17    | 64:22                |\n| 153:12 166:4<br>ago   | 137:25 138:12        | anticipated 60:5    | april 1:10 3:4,5     |\n| agree 3:14 59:12      | 159:11,15 183:17     | 60:11 62:9 68:15    | 137:22 159:5         |\n| 91:696:16 100:22      | amounts 51:22        | anticipates 78:16   | 188:19               |\n| 107:13,17             | 132:19 134:23        | anybody<br>83:24    | arbitration<br>171:4 |\n| agreed 143:8          | 138:4,9 156:14       | 145:16              | areas 12:11 22:12    |\n| 179:12                | analysis   68:6 83:4 | anymore<br>116:9    | 22:21                |\n| agreeing 179:9,25     | 84:3 87:19 89:18     | 142:11 164:15       | 19:4<br>arena        |\n| agreement 55:13       | 92:25 95:2 96:19     | anyone's<br>161:15  | 170:8<br>argue       |\n| 61:8 67:25 78:6       | 105:9 107:20         | 41:14<br>anytime    | argument 117:21      |\n| 91:22 127:23,25       | 115:18 168:10        | anyway<br>69:16     | 144:6                |\n| 175:13                | analyzed<br>168:14   | anyway's 70:8       | aronsson   2:5 4:18  |\n| 128:8<br>agreements   | analyzing<br>80:18   | 87:6 163:23 164:2   | 4:18 6:2,12 7:4,13   |\n| 128:16,18             | 82:4                 | apartment 101:6,9   | 10:12 11:12 12:9     |\n| ahead  40:8 122:20    | andersen<br>17:9     | 102:6 114:17        | 26:20,25 27:13       |\n| 97:15<br>aircraft     | 167:15<br>annoys     | 115:2,7 146:21      | 29:18 32:11 34:21    |\n| 119:5                 | 8:20 9:11<br>answer  | 1 50:4              | 35:6 47:22 48:5      |\n| alive 114:5           | 9:19,21 24:21        | apologize 35:2      | 83:11 88:13 90:18    |\n| allegations 40:24     | 26:22,24 27:12       | 56:22 167:9         | 93:10,17 97:6        |\n| 81:5 156:7<br>alleged | 28:12 29:11,11,13    | apparently 28:19    | 99:22 103:5,6        |\n| alleging 83:18        | 29:17 36:11 38:17    | 174:21              | 111:2 128:22         |\n| alliance 2:3 4:20     | 53:16,21 54:12       | appear<br>100:20    | 129:7 130:5 131:2    |\n| 6:13 10:23            | 83:20 88:16          | appearance 4:16     | 131:5,9,23 139:18    |\n| allocated 141:16      | 101:20 104:18        | 4:12<br>appearances | 146:6 147:13         |\n| allocating<br>117:25  | 105:16 113:17        | applicability       | 154:17 164:14        |\n| allocation<br>145:11  | 116:8,21 118:2       | 148:6,15            | 187:19,20,21         |\n| 152:3                 | 119:6 120:5          |                     |                      |\n\n[arrange - back]\n\n| arrange<br>163:15    | 164:9 170:15,17       | 23:9 28:8 182:10     | 164:16 165:3                  |\n|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------|\n| arrangement          | 170:19 171:5          | attorneys 2:3,9,13   | 166:12,22 170:12              |\n| 54:20                | 178:17,17             | 14:16 15:6,16        | 170:22 177:25                 |\n| arrive<br>136:8      | assigned 74:24        | 25:8 32:3 40:21      | 184:24                        |\n| 17:9<br>arthur       | 52:18 86:17<br>assist | 46:23 47:6 98:9      | 26:13<br>authored             |\n| articulated 143:22   | assistance 45:11      | 98:21,24 99:6,14     | 27:9                          |\n| ascribe<br>144:2,15  | 55:18 61:9 73:16      | 104:24 106:20        | authorities 75:11             |\n| ascribed<br>118:17   | 80:17 82:8 84:23      | 109:23 142:3         | authorization 48:7            |\n| 141:25 149:24        | 85:18 86:6 88:21      | 147:3 178:3.3        | 48:19 49:3                    |\n| ascribes<br>120:22   | 112:3171:12,15        | attributed 138:4     | authorized 4:6                |\n| 121:7                | assisted<br>15:19     | audible<br>8:24      | automobiles                   |\n| ascribing 142:22     | 51:9,12 109:14        | audio<br>3:12,12     | 115:16,16                     |\n| asia 2:3 4:20 6:14   | 112:10,11 113:3       | audit<br>75:13,18,20 | available 135:2               |\n| 10:23                | 141:4                 | auditing 22:21       | 137:16 160:22                 |\n| aside    15:22 47:5  | associated<br>66:20   | 149:22<br>aught      | 69:16<br>avoid                |\n| 67:7 83:17 161:9     | 117:2                 | august 17:10         | avoidable 82:9                |\n| asked<br>36:8 47:19  | association<br>107.9  | aulet 2:10 5:3,3,12  | 83:2 84:13 171:17             |\n| 53:23 56:15,21,22    | 9:6 92:20<br>assume   | 9:17 12:4,6,24       | aware 25:17 30:19             |\n| 64:20 110:7          | 92:24 173:18          | 13:6 24:20 26:16     | 88:6 90:8,10                  |\n| 151:21 152:19        | assumed 150:13        | 26:23 27:11,13,16    | 114:24                        |\n| 172:25 178:6         | 153:15 154:3          | 28:7 29:19 34:10     | awful 47:11                   |\n| asking 13:17,19,20   | assuming 28:15        | 37:16 39:5 46:20     | 168:23,24                     |\n| 34:14 67:18 98:22    | 50:23 72:13           | 57:22 58:18 61:4     | awfully<br>88:4               |\n| 101:2,18,21 102:2    | 118:21                | 64:14 66:13 77:4     | awhile<br>82:9                |\n| 105:15 148:12,17     | assumption            | 78:21 79:22 83:7     | b                             |\n| 149:12 151:4,5       | 143:10                |                      |                               |\n|                      |                       | 83:13 84:25 85:8     |                               |\n| 153:5 156:11,12      | attach<br>69:14       | 88:3,8,16 91:9       | 2:65:21 6:5 7:5<br>o          |\n| 156:13 162:22        | attached 79:16        | 92:2 93:5 95:9       | 11:2,22 75:13,17              |\n| 170:23 181:14        | 168:18                | 96:10 97:2 98:15     | 76:2 94:17,20,21              |\n| asks 108:11,17,18    | attachment 129:9      | 99:23 101:17         | 94:23 95:12 96:13             |\n| 113:14 115:13        | 129:21 130:8          | 102:8 103:24         | 187:2                         |\n| 120:4 121:16         | 140:11                | 104:13 106:18        | 19:25<br>baby                 |\n| 122:11 151:14        | attempts<br>120:24    | 108:21 111:22        | babysitting 19:10             |\n| 166:9<br>aspects     | attend 45:13          | 112:22 113:24        | bachelor 17:7                 |\n| assenting 37:9       | attended 45:14,16     | 118:4 122:18         | back 7:18 11:19               |\n| assessment 101:14    | 47:11                 | 126:3 127:7 129:4    | 13:20 27:6 29:24              |\n| 153:7<br>assessments | attending<br>4:11     | 129:25 130:16        | 34:3 41:5 49:13               |\n| 78:3<br>asset        | 46:14                 | 131:6,11 132:11      | 55:12 69:25 71:16             |\n| 88:2 94:2<br>assets  | attention<br>105:20   | 133:18 141:18        | 82:16 90:25 91:4              |\n| 104:7 111:16         | attorney 2:17 4:17    | 148:20 149:7         | 95:17 103:7                   |\n| 120:23 128:12        | 6:12 9:18 13:5        | 152:11 157:20        | 111:23 112:13<br>114:4 127:11 |\n\n# [back - bullet]\n\n| 131:7 140:4 159:7 | beach<br>122:14      | 119:8 121:2         | bridgeport<br>1:3  |\n|-------------------|----------------------|---------------------|--------------------|\n| 159:21 162:10     | bearing 76:9,9       | big 34:4,15,16      | 2:14 3:21          |\n| 165:12 167:14     | 32:15 140:8<br>bears | 35:20 52:23         | brief 90:22        |\n| 173:2 181:15      | 42:18<br>beast       | biggest 19:4        | 14:21<br>briefly   |\n| background 17:2   | beautiful<br>164:20  | bill 45:19 72:12,23 | 65:24 128:5        |\n| 153:6 159:21,22   | beginning<br>4:16    | 73:6                | 163:24<br>bring    |\n| balance 69:20     | 180:12               | billed 67:13,14,16  | 7:21 22:9<br>broad |\n| hank  37:25 52:15 | behalf 12:23 21:7    | bills 19:14 55:3    | broadly 109:5      |\n| 64:21,24 65:6     | 21:8 38:21 108:11    | 72:3 122:4 146:24   | 115:13 132:8       |\n| 69:18 91:6,16     | 108:15 117:6         | binders 69:14       | brought 40:3,20    |\n| 158:7             | 118:14,23 130:24     | birnbaum 2:17       | 167:17 168:3,19    |\n| bank's 91:18      | 132:17 133:12        | bit<br>14:20 17:2   | brown 2:8 5:4      |\n| bankruptcies      | 144:10 145:15        | 21:25 24:3 46:17    | 15:21 23:10,16     |\n| 164:5             | 152:23 155:17        | 139:16              | 24:6,8,18 25:8     |\n| bankruptcy 1:2    | 184:11               | biweekly 66:25      | 26:5,6,10 30:9     |\n| 3:20 20:11,22     | behest<br>182:16     | blood 188:15        | 31:20 32:3 38:10   |\n| 21:13,24 22:6,11  | believe 24:4 45:2,5  | 131:13<br>blue      | 38:12 39:2,16      |\n| 32:25 38:15 39:19 | 50:18 72:14 99:19    | bookkeepers         | 43:23 49:24 56:13  |\n| 39:22 44:6,7,7    | 100:7 144:21         | 52:16 53:14,18,19   | 57:4 58:25 59:6    |\n| 51:2 64:25 74:13  | 160:12 162:21        | 53:20,25 66:19      | 59:10,17 64:20     |\n| 75:4 77:15,24     | 167:4 175:7          | books 82:8 84:12    | 83:18 98:25 99:6   |\n| 80:4,13 81:2,23   | believes<br>27:19    | 84:14,18 92:18      | 102:11,17 103:18   |\n| 82:15 83:23 90:3  | 102:23<br>belong     | 171:16,20 172:17    | 103:18 104:10,16   |\n| 115:2 168:7,22    | 119:23 160:7         | boston 17:6,6       | 104:17 105:7,12    |\n| 177:17 178:11     | belonged 101:15      | 18:16               | 106:6 109:24       |\n| base 59:9         | 102:6 103:14         | bottle 34:25 42:8   | 112:14 123:25      |\n| based 27:16,21    | belonging 104:8      | 164:21              | 126:7,14 139:7     |\n| 28:23 63:5 72:25  | ben   13:5 14:16,21  | bottom 49:11        | 156:2 157:15       |\n| 87:14 158:5 159:2 | ל: 24                | 105:19 132:9        | 175:17 178:7       |\n| basic<br>129:16   | beneficiary          | 145:19 162:3        | 181:3,5            |\n| basically 37:9    | 121:25               | bought 101:23       | buckets 19:3       |\n| 39:11 155:13      | benefit 124:3        | 117:18              | 21:19 155:14       |\n| basis 37:14,21    | benefitting 149:18   | box 2:14            | budget 61:10,23    |\n| 66:25 69:7,8      | best 13:2 28:9 52:4  | brain 93:8          | 61:24 62:2         |\n| 73:10 80:11 81:7  | 56:10 60:9,14        | break   9:9,12 85:9 | budgeting 42:10    |\n| 81:8,8 90:7       | 137:2 145:20         | 85:15 139:19        | 63:16 86:15        |\n| 123:12 143:9,23   | 184:13               | breakdown           | budgets 42:13,13   |\n| 145:9             | better 86:23         | 160:10              | build 78:2         |\n| bates 32:15 35:9  | 103:25 171:14        | breakdowns          | building 113:16    |\n| 129:2 140:8       | beyond 14:13         | 163:19              | bullet 55:17 61:7  |\n| 147:17            | 38:18 53:13 116:7    |                     | 92:19 112:3        |\n|                   |                      |                     |                    |\n\n[bullet - certain]\n\n| 114:16 171:10                    | 96:1 97:1 98:1      | callable<br>144:5     | 175:17 176:5        |\n|----------------------------------|---------------------|-----------------------|---------------------|\n| business 6:7 22:10               | 99:1 100:1 101:1    | called 5:21 20:18     | 177:3,6,18,23       |\n| 41:21,24,25 42:8                 | 102:1 103:1 104:1   | 41:8 89:22            | 178:5,5,23 179:10   |\n| 42:11,22 43:3                    | 105:1 106:1 107:1   | calling 145:7         | 179:13 182:12       |\n| 167:19 178:21,22                 | 108:1 109:1 110:1   | calls 25:11,15        | cases 21:2,4 40:16  |\n| 184:20                           | 111:1 112:1 113:1   | 58:24 93:6 143:15     | 41:25 64:10 90:5    |\n| businesses 19:5                  | 114:1 115:1 116:1   | 178:23,25 181:19      | 92:8 161:24         |\n| 162:7<br>button                  | 117:1 118:1 119:1   | camera<br>8:11        | 163:10 164:11       |\n| 117:23<br>buying                 | 120:1 121:1 122:1   | cancelled 158:7       | 166:7,18 169:14     |\n| C                                | 123:1 124:1 125:1   | capabilities 18:2     | 172:6 176:14        |\n|                                  | 126:1 127:1 128:1   | capital 126:8,20      | 177:17              |\n| 2:2 3:1 4:1 5:1,21<br>C          | 129:1 130:1 131:1   | 179:14,15,25          | cash<br>36:14 37:10 |\n| 6:17:18:19:1                     | 132:1 133:1 134:1   | 116:3,17 117:9<br>car | 37:19 42:12,13      |\n| 10:1 11:1 12:1                   | 135:1 136:1,7       | 67:679:4<br>care      | 61:10 62:12,13,23   |\n| 13:1 14:1 15:1                   | 137:1 138:1 139:1   | career 47:12          | 63:15,15,22 69:9,9  |\n| 16:1 17:1 18:1                   | 140:1 141:1 142:1   | 97:14 117:19<br>cars  | 69:21 78:18 79:2    |\n| 19:1 20:1 21:1                   | 143:1 144:1 145:1   | 1:6 3:22 6:17<br>case | 79:3 86:18 87:13    |\n| 22:1 23:1 24:1                   | 146:1 147:1 148:1   | 15:24 33:21 41:19     | 121:19,22,24        |\n| 25:1 26:1 27:1                   | 149:1 150:1 151:1   | 41:22,23,24 42:19     | 152:21 157:5,10     |\n| 28:1 29:1 30:1                   | 152:1 153:1 154:1   | 43:3,4 44:3,13,14     | 171:6               |\n| 31:1 32:1 33:1                   | 155:1 156:1 157:1   | 48:10 49:15 50:22     | catch 88:25 89:2    |\n| 34:1 35:1 36:1                   | 158:1 159:1 160:1   | 50:23 51:2,5,20       | 89:14,15 156:16     |\n| 37:1 38:1 39:1                   | 161:1 162:1 163:1   | 52:10 54:17 55:8      | categories 7:21     |\n| 40:1 41:1 42:1                   | 164:1 165:1 166:1   | 55:11,16 56:10        | 118:24 136:2,23     |\n| 43:1 44:1 45:1                   | 167:1 168:1 169:1   | 59:7 60:9,14          | 137:25              |\n| 46:1 47:1 48:1<br>49:1 50:1 51:1 | 170:1 171:1 172:1   | 61:22 62:9,19         | categorization      |\n|                                  | 173:1 174:1 175:1   | 64:2 66:5 67:4,17     | 137:9               |\n| 52:1 53:1 54:1                   | 176:1 177:1 178:1   | 68:12,21 69:2         | categorized         |\n| 55:1 56:1 57:1<br>58:1 59:1 60:1 | 179:1 180:1 181:1   | 70:4,7,9,11 71:5,6    | 155:24              |\n| 61:1 62:1 63:1                   | 182:1 183:1 184:1   | 71:19 73:11,25        | category<br>138:4   |\n| 64:1 65:1 66:1                   | 185:1 186:2 188:2   | 74:2,7,11,19 75:9     | cats 89:12          |\n| 67:1 68:1 69:1                   | 188:2               | 75:14,22 76:22        | caution 46:21 83:7  |\n| 70:1 71:1 72:1                   | calculates 69:10    | 77:21 78:5,25         | 132:20 142:21       |\n|                                  | calculation 151:3   | 79:5 81:6 82:24       | caveat 89:3         |\n| 73:1 74:1,9,10                   | calender 72:7       | 84:7 86:4,25 90:6     | cc'd 26:12 27:10    |\n| 75:1 76:1 77:1<br>78:1 79:1 80:1 | 19:10 31:18<br>call | 93:20 107:24          | 3:10 167:8<br>cell  |\n| 81:1 82:1 83:1                   | 45:18 79:11 102:4   | 111:5 131:24          | cellphone 176:10    |\n| 84:1 85:1 86:1                   | 104:25 163:4,7,9    | 164:7 167:18,25       | cellular 3:8        |\n| 87:1 88:1 89:1                   | 166:5,16 170:18     | 169:8,24 170:9        | 87:18<br>cents      |\n| 90:1 91:1 92:1                   | 178:3               | 172:10,10,13,15       | certain 40:17 94:3  |\n|                                  |                     | 172:15 173:12         | 113:22 174:6        |\n| 93:1 94:1,17 95:1                |                     |                       |                     |\n\n#### **[certainly - concurring]**\n\n| certainly<br>22:3      | 158:10                 | clients<br>18:25 19:13 | 70:23 156:6 157:3   |\n|------------------------|------------------------|------------------------|---------------------|\n| 62:20 72:20 84:3       | checked<br>64:24       | close<br>70:5          | 165:18 175:20       |\n| 91:11 102:14           | 141:5                  | closure<br>75:15       | common<br>158:25    |\n| 106:19 109:8           | checks<br>66:20        | clothes<br>103:12      | communicate<br>26:9 |\n| 112:10 124:7           | chinese<br>174:22      | club<br>122:13         | 30:11 57:11 99:4    |\n| 140:25 166:8           | chooses<br>76:6        | code<br>75:4 80:13,14  | 99:5                |\n| certification<br>17:20 | cia<br>18:13           | 82:15                  | communicated        |\n| 17:23 18:9             | cira<br>18:7,14,15     | cohn<br>2:17           | 58:16 98:24         |\n| certifications         | circulate<br>32:4,8    | collateral<br>42:14    | communicates        |\n| 18:12                  | circulated<br>88:7     | colleague<br>45:5,15   | 30:13               |\n| certified<br>17:23     | circumstances          | 100:25 129:20          | communicating       |\n| 18:4,6 165:19          | 15:25 33:13 60:6       | 146:14 181:18          | 104:19              |\n| 166:15                 | 73:14 114:8            | colleagues<br>13:7     | communications      |\n| certify<br>186:4,8     | cite<br>164:7          | 30:18 31:24            | 65:14,19 180:4      |\n| 188:8,13               | citizens<br>65:6       | collect<br>13:13 177:9 | 181:16              |\n| chain<br>32:17 35:11   | city<br>58:8 146:22    | college<br>17:6,6      | company<br>89:21    |\n| 38:6 103:21 104:9      | civil<br>11:2          | 18:16                  | 169:13              |\n| 129:10 131:15          | claim<br>52:20 80:19   | column<br>136:7        | comparative         |\n| 139:23 147:9           | 80:24 81:3,5,16,21     | combine<br>72:7        | 183:19              |\n| 151:14 187:6,7,11      | 168:13,16              | come<br>50:23 53:14    | compare<br>110:6    |\n| 187:12,13,14           | claimed<br>125:5       | 54:21 71:16 74:18      | compared<br>110:6   |\n| change<br>146:11       | claims<br>52:24 54:8   | 74:20 169:14           | complete<br>69:18   |\n| changed<br>139:4       | 81:7,10,12,25 82:5     | 172:6 173:14           | completely<br>74:5  |\n| 146:4                  | 82:11,18 88:2          | 175:9,11               | 108:3 168:2         |\n| changes<br>43:24       | 90:2 168:10,14         | comes<br>19:15         | compliance<br>42:24 |\n| 44:10                  | 171:18 175:15          | 100:23 118:8           | complicated<br>43:4 |\n| changing<br>139:3      | clarification<br>96:15 | 167:14                 | 52:23               |\n| 144:22 153:8           | 97:3                   | comfortable<br>176:4   | compound<br>139:2   |\n| chapter<br>1:5 21:2,3  | clarity<br>119:20      | coming<br>34:25        | comprehensive       |\n| 55:3 70:3 74:19        | cleaning<br>145:5,15   | 62:23 78:18 142:5      | 89:6                |\n| 81:6,6,11 86:10,22     | clear<br>24:12 28:18   | 162:10                 | computers<br>169:5  |\n| 86:24,25 115:3,4,8     | 39:14 98:10            | comley<br>2:12 5:7     | concerning<br>12:21 |\n| 164:4 166:7,18         | 101:21                 | 165:17                 | concerns<br>142:25  |\n| 167:5,18 169:23        | clearly<br>56:18 79:2  | comment<br>36:21,21    | 144:11              |\n| 176:17,20,22           | 141:3                  | 37:8,8,9               | concluded<br>185:10 |\n| charge<br>160:5        | clerical<br>55:5,7     | comments<br>112:25     | concludes<br>185:6  |\n| chart<br>136:18        | client<br>4:23 5:2     | commercial<br>70:7     | conclusion<br>28:20 |\n| 137:14 153:3           | 30:8 34:5,6 35:21      | commission<br>157:9    | concurred<br>39:11  |\n| check<br>73:3 110:18   | 36:23 37:6 38:3        | committee<br>2:13      | concurring<br>37:12 |\n| 134:23 138:8           | 39:8                   | 5:8 20:19 21:4,5       | 38:4                |\n| 152:21 158:7,10        |                        | 62:3 66:23 70:21       |                     |\n|                        |                        |                        |                     |\n\n#### **[condition - covered]**\n\n| condition<br>9:25    | 119:18 121:11         | controller<br>169:13  | 43:14 62:3,4          |\n|----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|\n| condo<br>107:10      | 124:5 125:23          | conversation<br>8:17  | 70:21 97:12,18,20     |\n| confer<br>158:10,25  | 128:11 134:21         | conversations<br>3:8  | 98:12,14 99:19        |\n| confident<br>175:3,5 | 135:20 154:19         | 27:17 44:5 46:22      | 100:17 124:8          |\n| confirm<br>65:2      | 155:2 157:18          | 47:6 102:15,16        | 135:22 136:5          |\n| 86:10,21 114:4       | conservative          | converted<br>70:12    | 141:3 158:11          |\n| 136:11 158:24        | 143:25 144:9          | copies<br>69:18       | 169:19 171:14         |\n| 172:8                | 145:21                | copy<br>8:14 94:22    | 172:2,14 180:11       |\n| confirmation         | consider<br>157:22    | 100:21 158:7          | 180:14,24 181:4       |\n| 20:17                | 167:20                | copyrights<br>120:4,6 | 182:19                |\n| confirmed<br>70:12   | consideration         | 120:14,17             | counsel's<br>182:16   |\n| 115:5 143:14         | 141:22                | corp<br>74:10         | count<br>118:15       |\n| 154:4                | consistent<br>183:13  | corporate<br>74:7     | countries<br>42:6     |\n| conflicts<br>24:12   | constituency          | corporation<br>74:7   | country<br>42:22      |\n| confusion<br>69:17   | 21:11,13              | 74:9,10 75:23         | county<br>188:4       |\n| congress<br>19:18    | consultation<br>98:17 | correct<br>58:19      | couple<br>60:14 92:7  |\n| conjecture<br>122:19 | 126:2 142:3           | 62:17 63:10 72:13     | 99:21 110:13          |\n| connecticut<br>1:2   | consulted<br>64:21    | 76:23 94:25 95:25     | 147:20 164:18         |\n| 2:14,18 3:21 17:5    | 138:18,18             | 97:23 102:25          | 176:23,23             |\n| 76:13,14,19          | consulting<br>88:21   | 107:25 108:25         | course<br>30:21       |\n| 113:20 148:5,14      | contact<br>25:3 30:19 | 109:2 114:12          | 52:19 56:16 62:8      |\n| 149:17 173:19        | 180:13                | 121:12 134:8,19       | 70:24 156:7,8         |\n| 176:15               | contacted<br>23:6,8   | 149:15 152:20         | 169:22 181:7          |\n| connection<br>11:5   | contacts<br>25:4      | 153:21 156:19         | courses<br>17:15      |\n| 15:6 24:19 33:21     | contained<br>59:22    | 171:20 174:25         | court<br>1:2 3:20 4:4 |\n| 34:8 36:4,9,25       | 71:14 107:21          | 175:2 180:21          | 5:10,19 6:15,25       |\n| 39:2,18 43:2,25      | 136:24 163:19         | 186:9                 | 8:11 10:13 13:10      |\n| 46:3,10,18 50:14     | contention<br>28:3    | corrected<br>134:4    | 32:12 35:6 40:12      |\n| 50:25 51:6,20        | contents<br>101:8     | 134:12                | 45:3 47:22 55:2       |\n| 57:16 60:2 61:15     | contested<br>6:23     | correctly<br>148:22   | 62:10 78:9 87:12      |\n| 61:19 63:9 64:12     | context<br>20:12 22:6 | 149:4                 | 93:10 101:10          |\n| 66:11 68:15 73:19    | continue<br>3:13 74:8 | cost<br>117:2,25      | 111:2 128:22          |\n| 76:25 78:17 80:21    | 74:16 130:6           | 118:10,13,18          | 131:19 147:13         |\n| 83:5,19 84:14,19     | continued<br>16:16    | 141:25 142:6,22       | 171:13 175:21,22      |\n| 84:23 85:21 86:2     | 103:4 153:10          | 142:23 144:3          | 187:15                |\n| 87:20 88:15 89:19    | 154:16                | 145:3                 | cover<br>16:25 107:3  |\n| 92:15 96:20 97:11    | continues<br>68:21    | costly<br>89:6        | 128:13                |\n| 97:16 98:6,22        | 150:2,24              | costs<br>144:4        | covered<br>13:11      |\n| 103:8 104:7 106:3    | continuing<br>17:17   | counsel<br>4:10 5:4,7 | 76:20 83:14 85:19     |\n| 107:23 109:11        | 137:20                | 9:12,21 13:6,15       | 89:8 103:9 119:17     |\n| 110:11 112:21        |                       | 25:21,24 30:3         | 154:18                |\n|                      |                       |                       |                       |\n\n85\n\n[cpe - description]\n\n| сре<br>17:15,16                  | 147:11               | 120:22 121:7       | deducting 79:21      |\n|----------------------------------|----------------------|--------------------|----------------------|\n| craig 1:14 3:17 6:5              | dated 127:24         | 122:8,17 124:18    | deferred 78:3        |\n| 48:25 151:4 185:7                | daughter 141:23      | 125:3,5,12,18      | defers<br>1 રેરને તે |\n| 186:15                           | 143:2                | 126:23 130:25      | define<br>82:19      |\n| 161:25<br>crazy                  | david 2:6 4:21       | 132:17 133:13      | definition 72:5      |\n| create<br>72:23 157:6            | 100:4 103:9          | 141:5 142:5,21,23  | 101:5                |\n| created<br>86:13                 | day   39:9 44:24     | 143:5,12,15 144:3  | degree   17:7 18:16  |\n| 133:22                           | 45:14,16 46:24       | 145:18 147:2       | 45:13 179:5          |\n| 141:19,20<br>creator             | 47:8 51:13,14,15     | 148:13 150:14,18   | 18:19<br>degrees     |\n| creditor<br>42:15                | 52:4,4 63:16         | 152:24 155:15      | delaware<br>176:14   |\n| 47:14 81:5,13,16                 | 132:18 155:17        | 156:6,23 167:6     | 14:19<br>delayed     |\n| creditor's 2:13 5:8              | 169:21 182:22,23     | 168:5,25 169:19    | department 19:22     |\n| 165:17                           | 185:2 186:19         | 171:16 172:2,14    | 19:22 20:7 22:2      |\n| creditors 20:19,19               | 188:19               | 172:19 174:12,19   | 64:23                |\n| 21:9 67:2 86:16                  | 14:25 72:11<br>days  | 178:14 180:11,14   | depend 52:11         |\n| 86:23 171:6                      | 75:12,19,21 82:17    | 180:16,24 181:4    | depending 42:8       |\n| crises<br>52:7                   | 82:21 83:22 92:23    | 183:3 184:11       | 51:23 78:24 79:4     |\n| 138:8<br>cross                   | 145:4 183:22,24      | debtor's 38:23     | 158:19               |\n| crosschecked                     | deadline 81:10,13    | 47:25 48:18 49:2   | depends 78:18        |\n| 136:22                           | deal<br>80:6         | 58:9,11,13 62:4,18 | 168:12 171:25        |\n| cumulative 69:7                  | 167:22,23,24<br>debt | 63:4 74:20 79:8    | depicted 136:24      |\n| 134:17,18                        | debtor    1:7 5:5    | 79:20 87:15,25     | deposition 1:14      |\n| curious<br>88:14                 | 16:9,13,15,20,23     | 106:15 108:10,19   | 3:12,17,23 6:22,25   |\n| 88:17<br>current                 | 20:11 21:5,6         | 108:22 111:16      | 7:6 10:16,24         |\n| 118:20                           | 25:16,22 36:15       | 123:20 141:23      | 11:22 13:4,21        |\n| currently 18:21                  | 37:11,20,25 38:3,9   | 144:10 164:9       | 14:23 15:7,17        |\n| 88:7 122:9 134:16                | 38:22 39:15 42:16    | 166:9,19 167:15    | 16:5,10,11 27:25     |\n| 171:21                           | 45:13 52:14,25       | 171:20 172:16      | 28:20 41:12 45:23    |\n| cycle<br>155:6,10                | 54:19,25 57:10,10    | 175:19 187:8       | 49:21 137:20         |\n| d                                | 57:12 58:16 62:15    | debtors 20:18 42:4 | 187:5                |\n| d<br>81:14 109:22                | 70:22,22 76:6,8,12   | 48:6               | depositions 40:14    |\n| 128:3 186:2                      | 76:21 77:3 78:19     | december 74:24     | 42:9<br>deposits     |\n| 187:17                           | 79:23,25 80:4        | 77:7 161:18        | describe 46:17       |\n| 162:5,7<br>data                  | 82:8 84:12,14        | decide<br>103:10   | 58:20 155:8          |\n| date<br>1:10,16 10:18            | 88:23 94:4 101:8     | decision 37:12     | described 70:14      |\n| 32:19 35:13 44:20                | 101:11,16 108:16     | 39:12 87:14        | 103:21 104:10        |\n|                                  | 111:18 113:18        | 102:13 141:4       | 128:5 136:2          |\n| 48:4 67:19,20<br>71:4 75:12 86:3 | 114:3 115:15,21      | declaration 62:19  | 142:10 169:25        |\n| 87:20 93:15 111:9                | 116:5,6,10,12        | declared 40:18     | description<br>114:7 |\n| 129:12 131:17                    | 117:7 118:5,14,16    | deductible<br>78:2 | 138:11 187:4         |\n| 137:15 139:25                    | 118:24 120:15,16     | 79:2,7             |                      |\n|                                  |                      |                    |                      |\n\n#### **[descriptions - due]**\n\n| descriptions          | 70:16,25 91:6,8      | 106:10,21 126:11      | 109:7,12 129:5,8     |\n|-----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|\n| 136:10                | 92:11,15             | 139:13 143:13         | 182:25               |\n| designated<br>12:2,7  | direct<br>29:10,16   | 155:22 165:10         | dog<br>103:13        |\n| designation           | 105:20 130:2         | discussions<br>43:13  | dogs<br>89:12        |\n| 165:23,25             | directed<br>28:10    | 43:15 106:5           | doing<br>7:18 22:18  |\n| detail<br>145:8       | 88:23 182:3          | 113:11 137:21         | 51:8 60:2 61:19      |\n| 160:19,23             | directly<br>104:15   | dismissed<br>70:12    | 61:21 78:17 88:17    |\n| detailed<br>27:15     | 143:11               | disparity<br>164:8    | 91:16 157:17         |\n| 160:10,13             | director<br>51:4,4   | displayed<br>161:4    | 162:13 176:6         |\n| details<br>135:24     | disagree<br>81:17,19 | dispute<br>28:3 29:19 | 182:13               |\n| 163:6,18              | 170:3,4              | 29:20 130:6           | doj<br>161:10        |\n| determination         | disbursed<br>155:16  | distinct<br>74:5,14   | dollar<br>154:14     |\n| 38:5 39:3,12          | disbursement<br>62:9 | distribution<br>136:8 | dollars<br>96:5      |\n| 87:17 101:10          | 72:5 117:17          | 136:14 138:13         | 125:15 126:8         |\n| 137:5                 | disbursements        | distributions         | 132:21,22 133:23     |\n| determine<br>87:13    | 52:17 54:4,15,16     | 139:6                 | 133:24 146:20        |\n| 156:3                 | 54:24 63:16,20       | district<br>1:2 3:20  | 154:12 159:16,16     |\n| determined<br>72:25   | 67:2 68:22 73:2      | divided<br>141:13     | 159:18 164:12        |\n| determining           | 77:14 86:19 91:14    | division<br>1:3 3:21  | 177:2 183:24,25      |\n| 178:15                | 91:15 92:15 137:8    | docket<br>48:10       | double<br>73:2       |\n| develop<br>67:5       | 157:10 184:16        | 93:19 97:7 100:20     | 110:18 134:23        |\n| developed<br>183:20   | disclaimers          | 111:6 131:24          | doubt<br>114:20      |\n| developing<br>87:24   | 111:15               | document<br>10:20     | draft<br>88:7 98:14  |\n| development<br>86:7   | disclose<br>46:21    | 32:14,15 33:3         | 107:23 114:19,20     |\n| difference<br>38:8    | 83:9,16              | 35:9,16 48:6,12,15    | 126:13 130:15        |\n| 41:23 108:6           | disclosed<br>84:6    | 48:23,24 55:12        | 136:17 140:24        |\n| different<br>41:21    | 161:4,5              | 93:18,21 94:11        | 141:16 142:15        |\n| 42:18 51:22 52:2      | disclosing<br>29:7   | 96:25 100:20          | drafted<br>31:19     |\n| 77:21 80:5 108:2      | 118:22 182:14        | 101:19 105:19         | 43:11,16 112:25      |\n| 108:3,16 144:18       | disclosure<br>68:25  | 107:21 109:4          | drafter<br>138:17    |\n| differing<br>51:22    | discovery<br>40:13   | 111:5,11 112:9,21     | drafting<br>31:22    |\n| difilippo<br>2:22 4:2 | discreet<br>89:4     | 127:18 128:25         | 46:2,5 98:13         |\n| digit<br>110:15,15    | discuss<br>8:13      | 131:24,25 135:10      | 103:10 105:22        |\n| digital<br>120:19     | 147:19               | 140:9 141:21          | 112:11 124:5         |\n| diligence<br>179:8    | discussed<br>85:23   | 146:10 147:16,19      | drafts<br>32:4 62:21 |\n| dip<br>14:9 28:24     | 94:5 98:20 106:19    | 147:21 154:22         | driving<br>161:24    |\n| 54:20 61:22 62:14     | 127:15 130:4         | 155:3                 | 172:13,14            |\n| 63:19,23 64:2,4,10    | 143:7                | documents<br>13:9     | drop<br>41:10        |\n| 64:16 65:3,11,15      | discussing<br>132:3  | 13:13,16,17,23        | due<br>44:23 45:7    |\n| 65:19,22,24 66:3,6    | discussion<br>11:17  | 27:22 57:8,15,16      | 55:3 69:11 70:19     |\n| 66:15 68:2,20         | 15:24 99:15          | 57:20 105:11          | 75:7 81:22 179:8     |\n|                       |                      |                       |                      |\n\n[dues - exactly]\n\n| dues<br>107:10               | effectuating<br>63:20 | engagement 23:5      | 61:2<br>essentially  |\n|------------------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|\n| 5:22 186:5<br>duly           | 91:14                 | 23:7 24:2,10,19      | 158:14               |\n| 188:10                       | efficient 53:8        | 25:6 26:4,11         | establish 62:2       |\n| duties 41:20 43:2            | efficiently 52:5      | 30:12,14 31:16,22    | 81:21 156:17         |\n| 43:20,21 50:24               | eight<br>166:3        | 32:5 34:9 36:5,9     | established 74:13    |\n| 55:691:25 93:4               | either 42:17 81:5     | 40:5 43:12 44:2      | estate 42:20 53:4    |\n| e                            | 101:9 103:16          | 45:2 46:3,5 50:15    | 54:21 62:25 68:25    |\n|                              | 104:22 110:17         | 51:25 52:2 55:15     | 70:24 73:17 74:3     |\n| 2:2,2 5:21 6:5<br>e          | elapsed<br>39:11      | 55:16 84:15,19       | 74:14.14.18.21.23    |\n| 13:11,23 14:2,4              | elect 74:25 75:2,13   | 171:10 180:2         | 74:23 76:9,10,14     |\n| 15:20 26:9,13,13             | 75:18                 | engagements          | 77:20,24 78:19       |\n| 27:9,10 30:19                | election<br>19:18     | 166:17 177:16        | 79:24 80:4,7,8,10    |\n| 32:17 34:3 35:11             | electricity<br>107:11 | english 127:13       | 81:23 83:3 94:22     |\n| 35:19 37:18 38:6             | electronic<br>15:19   | 174:21               | 107:6 113:19,22      |\n| 39:7.9 41:17                 | electronics<br>100:24 | ensure 73:12         | 114:4 147:6 157:2    |\n| 49:22 59:11 81:14            | 119:17                | 136:23               | 175:9,11 181:10      |\n| 99:19 104:23,24              | eliminate<br>131:13   | entire 79:14,14,18   | estate's<br>87:25    |\n| 106:9 112:24                 | 150:21                | entirely<br>79:6     | estates<br>74:4      |\n| 117:5 129:9,10,15            | eliminated<br>150:20  | 138:23 139:6         | estimate<br>105:21   |\n| 129:17,24 130:11             | 150:22                | 157:10 172:9         | estimated 71:13      |\n| 131:15 132:22                | emphatically          | 42:3<br>entities     | 106:12               |\n| 139:23 141:2                 | 181:2 183:7           | 179:19               | estimates<br>73:11   |\n| 147:9 151:13                 | empirical 154:9       | entitled 1:16 48:6   | estimating 73:7      |\n| 152:9 155:16,25              | employ 14:8 38:21     | entity 74:5 103:15   | 97:14<br>etcetera    |\n| 160:18 162:19                | 48:8,19 49:3          | 114:24 119:25        | 120:5                |\n| 163:8 169:4                  | 90:11,17 168:6        | 126:22 154:14        | 114:13<br>evaluation |\n| 173:15 180:8,10              | employed 18:21        | 183:10,10 184:4      | 68:2<br>event        |\n| 180:19,22 181:21             | 36:15 37:11,20        | entries 148:7,16     | 103:21<br>events     |\n| 181:25 182:2,4               | 38:9,11,16 90:14      | equitable 113:15     | 104:10               |\n| 186:2 187:2,6,7,11           | 91:25                 | 125:23<br>erroneous  | everybody 60:21      |\n| 187:12,13,14,17              | 28:17<br>employee     | 159:11               | 75:9 93:7 156:8      |\n| 188:2,2                      | employees 28:22       | erroneously<br>125:5 | 175:18               |\n| earlier 68:10 94:5           | 29:2,5 42:5,23        | 125:14               | everybody's 45:2     |\n| 100:7                        | 50:20 182:11          | 110:22<br>error      | 69:8                 |\n| easy<br>73:2                 | employment 38:14      | 161:7 184:13         | everyone's 46:2      |\n| edits<br>135:15,16<br>140:23 | 89:7,8                | 136:4<br>errors      | 147:3 162:15         |\n|                              | endeavor 124:10       | escrow 91:7,20,21    | evidence 87:11       |\n| educated 155:22              | ended 183:23          | 91:22,24             | exactly 53:7 58:9    |\n| education<br>17:18           | engaged 20:11,15      | esq 2:5,6,6,10,15    | 115:4 117:4          |\n| educational 17:3             | 20:16 24:23 166:6     | 2:19                 | 130:22 159:13        |\n| effectively<br>38:4          | 179:10                |                      | 181:25               |\n|                              |                       |                      |                      |\n\n[examination - file]\n\n| examination<br>5:25   | expectation           | 27:21<br>expose                   | fear 28:5,6         |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------------------|---------------------|\n| 100:2 103:4           | 106:22                | extent<br>22:12 60:5              | feasibility<br>86:8 |\n| 153:10 154:16         | expected 33:5,13      | 65:4 78:3 83:8                    | 87:3,7,9            |\n| 165:14 185:9          | 123:20                | 113:6 137:12                      | feasible<br>87:16   |\n| 187:18 188:9,11       | 136:18<br>expense     | 143:17,18 146:23                  | february 45:8       |\n| examined 5:24         | 1 રેત-8               | 100:21<br>extra                   | 63:14 69:3 72:9,9   |\n| 101:3<br>example      | expenses<br>71:13     | 110:15 162:10                     | 77:6 122:22 125:4   |\n| 109:3 163:20<br>excel | 72:4 77:15,17,18      | f                                 | 129:22 132:17       |\n| 169:2<br>excess       | 78:23,25 79:7         |                                   | 133:11,12,25        |\n| exchanges 181:25      | 105:22 106:12,16      | 81:14 109:17,18<br>ﺎ              | 134:3 140:14,14     |\n| 160:4<br>excluded     | 106:23,23 107:2,3     | 188:2                             | 152:22,23 154:21    |\n| excluding -<br>125:21 | 107:9,15 108:10       | fa<br>41:19                       | 154:21 155:10,11    |\n| excuse 11:10          | 108:15,20,23          | 102:24<br>face                    | 156:15,17 159:9,9   |\n| 51:14 123:16          | 117:6 123:2           | fact<br>115:25 182:21             | 159:19,23 160:7     |\n| 126:12 137:22         | 124:11 129:22         | 15:24 60:5<br>facts               | federal 11:2 19:17  |\n| 153:14 174:23         | 130:9 133:5,15        | 99:10,13 113:9                    | 19:18 73:17 76:12   |\n| exhibit 7:7 10:14     | 134:10 136:24         | 114:8 146:15                      | 79:14.16,18         |\n| 10:17 32:14,18,21     | 140:13 147:7          | 147:4                             | 73:13 123:3<br>fee  |\n| 35:8,12 41:6 43:6     | 148:7,16 149:17       | factually 150:15                  | 157:7,8,9           |\n| 47:24 48:3 91:4       | 149:24 152:21         | 42:25 53:16<br>fair               | feel 48:11 67:3     |\n| 93:12,14 111:4,8      | 183:4,11,12,22        | 59:20,23 60:22                    | feeling 41:18       |\n| 128:24 129:11         | 184:5                 | 72:16 78:15 84:21                 | 142:2 178:22        |\n| 131:7,16,21           | experience 7:21       | 88:24 94:19 96:9                  | fees 33:18 53:9     |\n| 133:16 134:7          | 20:24,25 64:4,7       | 97:19 103:20                      | 54:24 62:6 68:2     |\n| 135:11,14,18          | 82:3 164:4,6          | 104:6 106:13                      | 69:8,11 70:21       |\n| 136:18 139:24         | 177:16                | 130:13 134:20                     | 72:24 77:18,25      |\n| 140:7 141:17          | expert 22:19,19       | 136:21 145:12                     | 156:4,24 163:3      |\n| 142:15 144:14         | 40:11,19 41:2         | 160:9                             | 175:4,8             |\n| 147:10,15 159:7       | 91:12 165:20          | 44:8<br>fairly                    | felt 132:24         |\n| 182:6 187:3,3,5,6     | 166:16                | familiar 7:23                     | fiduciaries 20:17   |\n| 187:7,8,9,10,11,12    | expertise<br>166:6,17 | 12:10 89:21                       | figure 136:5        |\n| 187:13,14             | expired<br>69:15      | family 19:15 58:8<br>103:13 118:9 | 155:19              |\n| exhibits<br>187:3,15  | 36:24<br>explain      | 129:8 132:16                      | figured 160:23      |\n| existed<br>101:23     | 41:22 70:2 82:13      |                                   | 162:16              |\n| 179:12                | 108:5 132:8 148:6     | 143:18<br>far                     | file 29:5 38:15,20  |\n| existence 57:7        | 150:8 159:12          | 6:21 67:14                        | 40:11 52:25 53:3    |\n| 143:17                | explained 37:15       | 171:21 173:12                     | 74:8,16 75:6 76:6   |\n| exists<br>172:7       | explanation           | 139:17<br>fast                    | 76:11,11,16 77:23   |\n| expect 51:7,19        | 144:15                | father 118:18                     | 78:14 81:5,7,16,20  |\n| 175:16                | explicit 66:2         | 143:20                            | 89:6 137:22         |\n|                       |                       | fault 73:8                        | 163:11 175:21       |\n|                       |                       |                                   |                     |\n\n[filed - francis]\n\n| filed 3:19 13:9       | 179:6,18             | 62:23 87:13<br>flows | 112:22 113:24         |\n|-----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|\n| 28:24 42:7,8,9        | 4:8<br>financially   | fluid<br>104:20      | 118:4 122:18          |\n| 45:3 48:10 49:7       | 87:16                | 13:7 30:18<br>flynn  | 125:3,14,16 126:3     |\n| 55:22 62:19 63:14     | financing 14:10      | 45:6,16 49:15,16     | 127:7 130:16          |\n| 68:12 69:23 75:8      | 28:25 54:20          | 50:5 56:4,24         | 132:11 133:18,22      |\n| 75:24 76:5 84:4       | find   40:10  117:25 | 112:17 129:18,19     | 134:15 135:3          |\n| 93:19 100:10          | 156:18               | 149:15,19 150:2      | 141:18 148:20         |\n| 111:5 122:22          | finish<br>8:19       | 150:24 151:11,14     | 149:7 152:11          |\n| 125:4,14,18           | finished 54:11       | 181:18               | 156:13 157:20         |\n| 131:24 135:3          | firm<br>4:3,5 21:24  | flynn's 46:10 50:7   | 166:12,22 170:12      |\n| 160:21 161:23         | 22:13 24:16 39:18    | 151:8                | 170:22 177:25         |\n| 167:4 168:16          | 40:3,25 51:5         | 44:20<br>focused     | 187:9                 |\n| 181:12                | 52:15 56:2,15        | focusing<br>46:6     | forms 98:16           |\n| files<br>80:10        | 112:15 139:14,14     | 108:18               | forth<br>101:7 112:13 |\n| filing 32:24 61:11    | 156:2 172:13         | folks 15:15 25:6     | 188:10                |\n| 63:12 73:23 75:12     | 176:9                | 29:24 30:10,14       | forward 63:17         |\n| 82:17 92:23 96:9      | firms<br>62:7 134:7  | 49:14.24 129:21      | 68:17 69:6 75:14      |\n| 96:12 98:23           | first 5:22 16:18     | follow<br>164:18     | 108:13 134:19         |\n| 113:23 132:3,6,18     | 19:3 21:23 43:16     | following 44:25,25   | 157:4 163:3           |\n| 138:2                 | 43:22 44:6,9,21,24   | 148:7,15             | 133:22<br>found       |\n| filings   56:7 73:18  | 45:14,25 46:24       | follows 5:24         | 145:3 146:14,18       |\n| final 62:22 87:17     | 47:8 51:13,14,14     | food<br>119:3        | 150:15,17 182:24      |\n| 133:15,24 135:17      | 51:15 55:17,18       | fool<br>178:19       | four   15:12 19:2,3   |\n| 135:21 136:3          | 69:23 73:9 75:19     | 186:8<br>foregoing   | 19:23 21:18 82:23     |\n| 137:24 140:12,20      | 89:3 93:25 94:14     | foreseeable 124:22   | 161:22 165:25         |\n| 140:22 141:4          | 105:3 112:3          | 102:19<br>forget     | foxboro 6:9           |\n| 144:8 159:8           | 122:21 129:23        | 11:10<br>forgot      | frame<br>34:25        |\n| 183:21,21             | 130:25 139:10        | form 22:16 34:10     | 118:23 146:23         |\n| finally 46:13         | 149:14 161:13,14     | 37:16 39:5 54:5      | 154:5                 |\n| 162:16                | 162:3 180:9 186:5    | 57:22 58:18 62:10    | francis 25:18,23      |\n| finances 61:12        | fit 89:13            | 64:14 66:13 72:6     | 26:2,10 30:2,6,7      |\n| 63:12,15              | fitting 101:4        | 72:21 77:4 78:21     | 31:4,8 32:9 56:17     |\n| financial   14:5 21:4 | five 39:10 128:2     | 80:25,25 81:2,3      | 57:3 59:3,5,18        |\n| 21:6 22:15 34:7       | 128:15 141:8         | 84:25 88:3 91:9      | 99:2,7 102:11,20      |\n| 36:23 37:6 39:8       | 161:22               | 92:2 93:5,13 94:2    | 102:21 103:17         |\n| 40:20 41:20 42:25     | 161:7 184:13<br>fix  | 94:21 95:9 96:10     | 104:12,15 105:4       |\n| 48:9,20 49:4 54:6     | flavors 17:15        | 98:13,14,15,19       | 105:14 106:7          |\n| 55:20 62:4,5          | 2:4<br>floor         | 102:8 103:24         | 109:25 112:15         |\n| 64:22 111:17          | flow<br>61:10 62:13  | 104:13 106:18        | 124:2 129:19          |\n| 112:5 166:10,19       | 62:13 69:21 86:18    | 108:21 109:15        | 135:23 139:8          |\n| 168:3 178:14          |                      | 110:20 111:22        | 143:13 148:4,12       |\n|                       |                      |                      |                       |\n\n# [francis - hampshire]\n\n| 152:9,13 156:3       | general<br>88:21   | god<br>47:14       | golden   2:17 5:16            |\n|----------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-------------------------------|\n| 157:16 180:9,18      | 100:15 155:8       | goes 7:18 43:19    | 26:18 27:17,18                |\n| frankly 33:12        | 163:9              | 79:5 101:6 124:18  | 28:7,10,14,17,23              |\n| 150:12               | generally 13:25    | 156:22             | 29:6 57:23 58:3               |\n| fraudulent 82:10     | 18:24 21:19 22:8   | going 3:3 10:13    | 179:6,9,12,24                 |\n| 82:20 171:18         | 24:2 25:5 36:24    | 32:12 35:7,8       | 180:5,6,7,10,15,20            |\n| 48:11<br>free        | 44:12 50:24 55:2   | 36:14 37:5,10,19   | 181:16,20 182:9               |\n| frequently 39:20     | 55:14 57:4 66:3    | 37:24 39:15 40:8   | 182:15,19,19                  |\n| 40:2,5 42:15         | 66:23 70:2 73:8    | 40:10,10 41:9      | 183:4,8 184:6                 |\n| 64:25 73:5           | 74:24 80:23 82:14  | 44:9 45:5,20 47:3  | goldman 2:15 5:6              |\n| front    15:9  44:18 | 90:12 109:10       | 47:23 52:3,12,22   | 5:6 6:20 7:10 27:3            |\n| 162:23 180:23        | 110:10 115:6       | 53:7,13 54:2,3,7,8 | 28:4 29:8 85:14               |\n| fuel<br>163:24       | 49:23<br>getting   | 54:9 59:2 68:17    | 164:17,23,24                  |\n| full<br>19:8 73:10   | 86:23 135:20       | 68:18,19,21 69:5,6 | 165:15,16 184:22              |\n| fully<br>12:20       | 137:21 176:4.8     | 69:24 70:19 73:23  | 185:3 187:21                  |\n| function 87:24       | 179:21             | 76:8,18,19 77:6,9  | golf 123:4                    |\n| fund 2:4 4:20 6:14   | 120:21<br>gettr    | 78:22,23 80:5,15   | good 3:2 6:10 44:8            |\n| 10:24                | 10:6 14:25<br>give | 85:8,14 87:2,3     | 165:16                        |\n| funding 127:23       | 147:24 152:20      | 89:5 91:18 92:20   | goods 100:25                  |\n| 128:17 184:5         | 153:2 161:6        | 92:23 93:8,11      | 119:16,19                     |\n| funds 70:17          | 164:25             | 96:24 106:24       | graduate<br>18:18,19          |\n| 108:12 130:23        | given 105:14       | 107:12,18 108:13   | graduated 17:4,6              |\n| 138:12 155:16        | 131:22 134:25      | 111:3 115:4        | gratuitous 37:7,8             |\n| 175:23               | 182:11 185:6       | 118:22 123:9,10    | 164:8<br>great                |\n| furnishings          | 186:10 188:12      | 123:13,23 124:12   | greenwich 113:20              |\n| 100:25               | 75:11<br>gives     | 124:13,14,17       | 123:9,14 150:13               |\n| further<br>163:5     | glasses<br>11:11   | 128:23 129:15,23   | 152:16 153:16,24              |\n| 184:23 186:8         | 14:6,7<br>global   | 131:19 134:19      | group 26:14 113:3             |\n| 188:13               | 51:10,11 111:7,14  | 139:15,16 143:6    | 143:7 144:8 153:8             |\n| future 69:23 78:4    | 111:24 187:10      | 147:14 149:2       | 120:20<br>gtv                 |\n| 78:5,8,12,20 85:3    | go 3:14 7:22 11:12 | 151:22 155:18,18   | guess 15:8,12 19:3            |\n| 86:19 87:13          | 28:2 38:12,13      | 155:19,20 156:15   | 77:5 127:2,3,6                |\n| 124:22 157:18        | 40:13 44:17 53:6   | 156:16,18 157:22   | 149:8                         |\n| g                    | 54:19 90:18        | 157:22,24 158:2,6  | guessing<br>66:8              |\n| 5:21                 | 103:25 107:5       | 158:12,21,23       | guidance<br>161:6             |\n| g                    | 111:23 114:4       | 159:3 161:5 163:3  | 170:24<br>guy                 |\n| garbage 61:3,3,5,6   | 122:3,20 124:18    | 163:14 168:21      | h                             |\n| 107:12<br>gas        | 139:15,16,19       | 169:16,18 170:25   |                               |\n| gasoline<br>117:9    | 144:7 156:21,22    | 171:5,11 175:10    | 23:16 187:2<br>h<br>half 93:7 |\n| gathered 29:4        | 164:21 176:25      | 175:23,25 177:8    |                               |\n| 123:17               | 183:20             | 181:9              | hampshire<br>176:16           |\n|                      |                    |                    | 176:24                        |\n\n# [hand - increase]\n\n| hand 27:24 32:12  | 174:15                 | hoping<br>148:25  | 116:25 117:18     |\n|-------------------|------------------------|-------------------|-------------------|\n| 34:22 47:23 93:11 | hearings<br>46:15      | 149:3 175:6 177:8 | 118:9 123:2,5     |\n| 110:9 111:3       | 21:13                  | hospital 122:4    | 173:13            |\n| 117:21 128:23     | heat<br>107:11         | 59:12<br>hot      | immediately 44:25 |\n| 130:22 131:20     | 1:17 3:23<br>held      | hotel<br>114:17   | 9:25<br>impair    |\n| 146:7 188:19      | 11:17 23:2 165:10      | 15:13<br>hour     | important 8:18    |\n| handing 147:14    | help 24:13 46:7        | hours<br>15:11,11 | 75:3 132:24 168:6 |\n| happen 47:13 52:3 | 57:7 137:4             | 39:10 67:21       | 172:11 174:7      |\n| 52:12 69:3 89:12  | helped<br>137:9        | 164:19 166:2      | inadvertent 133:6 |\n| 89:13 162:17      | helpful 14:14          | house 101:25      | 134:6,22          |\n| happens 80:3      | 38:25 137:4 138:8      | 149:17            | inadvertently     |\n| 81:15 82:22       | helping 100:9          | household 97:25   | 125:12 132:16     |\n| 178:11,12         | 169:11<br>helps        | 100:24 101:4,15   | 133:21 134:2      |\n| harassed 143:15   | hereinbefore           | 102:5 119:16,19   | inappropriate     |\n| harassment 27:21  | 186:11 188:10          | housekeeping      | 29:9,16           |\n| 28:5,6            | hereunto 188:18        | 144:20,23         | include 22:18     |\n| harbach 2:6 4:21  | 163:14,24<br>hev       | huh<br>8:25       | 80:11 94:16       |\n| 4:21 23:12 41:13  | high 17:3,5 19:10      | human 110:21      | 107:14 122:15     |\n| 59:13 85:16 99:20 | 19:24 94:14            | hundred 64:9      | included 65:14    |\n| 99:25 100:3,5     | hill   179:24 180:5    | 138:21 139:4      | 125:15 132:23     |\n| 103:2 147:24      | hire<br>80:5           | 141:13 142:22     | 133:19 134:2,5,13 |\n| 152:5 153:11      | 90:5<br>hired          | 143:6,24 144:2    | 134:23 137:14     |\n| 165:6 180:6       | hiring<br>40:25        | 146:20 168:15     | 150:25 151:25     |\n| 187:19,20         | history 17:3           | husband<br>141:12 | 159:11,17 160:11  |\n| hard 127:12       | hit<br>162:7           | 142:8 145:14      | includes 19:6     |\n| haven 2:18 116:2  | hits<br>73:7           | i                 | 61:23 62:12       |\n| 116:15            | 1:5 2:9 3:18 5:5<br>ho | idea 7:19 44:8    | including 39:22   |\n| hazard 15:8       | 11:6 94:4 111:18       | 67:23 90:17       | 40:14 61:11 70:24 |\n| hch 152:22        | hold 18:11,18          | 126:24 151:20     | 86:7 115:16       |\n| head 8:24 155:4   | 36:14 37:10,19         | identification    | inclusion 125:24  |\n| heading 11:22     | holding 114:25         | 10:17 32:19 35:13 | income 52:25 53:3 |\n| health 121:18,22  | home 6:7 107:8,9       | 48:3 93:15 111:9  | 53:5 62:15 63:5,9 |\n| 121:24 122:2,8    | 118:19,25              | 129:12 131:17     | 73:17,24 74:16,17 |\n| hear 127:13       | homeowner's            | 139:25 147:11     | 74:20 76:15,17,22 |\n| 171:14            | 154:10                 | identified 7:12   | 77:8,11,12 78:8   |\n| heard 45:24 82:21 | homeowners             | 103:22 104:8      | 79:20 87:25 125:5 |\n| 104:15 127:15,17  | 107:7                  | 134:7 181:23      | 125:16,21         |\n| 182:9             | 119:5 154:8<br>homes   | identity 26:18    | incorrect 125:18  |\n| hearing 45:17     | honestly 12:21         | 27:23 28:16 74:8  | increase 141:8    |\n| 46:14 47:9 51:15  | hope 64:3 100:22       | imagine 54:18     | 142:12,17 145:24  |\n| 123:18,19 127:18  | 159:4 171:2            | 61:25 66:22       |                   |\n|                   |                        |                   |                   |\n\n#### **[increased - issues]**\n\n| increased<br>142:14   | 139:7,12 145:2        | 122:2,8 146:4,12       | investigated          |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|\n| 144:13                | 146:10 152:10         | 146:19 148:8,17        | 101:22 110:11,24      |\n| increasing<br>141:10  | 153:3 155:13,14       | 150:3,4,11,12,16       | investigation<br>40:7 |\n| 143:23 145:10         | 156:20 157:14         | 150:17 152:15          | 40:9,22 59:16         |\n| incurred<br>142:6     | 158:20 174:4          | 153:24 154:7,10        | 63:8 95:7 97:22       |\n| 177:7                 | 176:3 177:22          | 158:21,22              | 102:9 108:24          |\n| independent<br>63:8   | 183:19,19 184:9       | intellectual<br>120:7  | 115:6,18 119:14       |\n| 95:6 97:21 114:10     | informed<br>44:2      | 120:13,15,18           | 119:22 128:11         |\n| 119:13 122:5          | 99:13 103:16,18       | intend<br>171:24       | 157:18 158:9          |\n| 123:19 128:7          | 103:19 104:16         | intended<br>32:25      | 179:15 183:15         |\n| 152:10                | 180:11                | 34:19 40:4,6 62:7      | investigations        |\n| indicate<br>7:2       | informs<br>127:5      | 89:15 110:20           | 114:11                |\n| indicating<br>135:12  | initial<br>140:23     | 125:19                 | investment<br>177:4   |\n| 137:18 152:6          | 141:20,21             | interact<br>16:23      | 177:6                 |\n| 161:19 162:11         | initiated<br>25:12    | 22:3                   | invoice<br>158:8      |\n| individual<br>21:8    | input<br>43:21 59:6   | interaction<br>146:17  | involved<br>20:7      |\n| 24:15 41:2,19,23      | 72:22 114:22          | interactions<br>15:2   | 31:21 49:15,17,20     |\n| 43:4 70:4 74:3,4,6    | inputting<br>162:4    | interest<br>20:22      | 50:21 52:24 53:4      |\n| 74:15,15,16,17        | inquire<br>153:23     | 53:11 77:20 80:3       | 55:24 56:6,20         |\n| 75:23 77:2,19         | inquiries<br>51:16    | 87:12 113:16           | 57:24 59:7 65:10      |\n| 164:4,11 183:23       | inquiry<br>161:9      | 119:10 120:7,18        | 65:18 90:9 100:8      |\n| individual's<br>27:20 | 163:16                | 121:16 147:5           | 101:13 105:22         |\n| individually<br>79:24 | insiders<br>82:19     | interested<br>4:9      | 109:6,9 132:4         |\n| individuals<br>19:5   | insolvency<br>17:24   | 22:15 41:17 49:10      | 178:7 179:21          |\n| 42:19 57:8 85:5       | 18:5,6 19:4 21:24     | 151:3 178:4            | involvement<br>115:9  |\n| 158:16                | 165:19 166:16         | 188:16                 | iphone<br>103:11      |\n| industry<br>60:17,21  | instance<br>62:3 89:9 | interests<br>101:11    | irrespective<br>70:19 |\n| inform<br>124:3       | 138:15                | 115:13                 | irs<br>76:19 89:10    |\n| information<br>12:20  | instances<br>40:19    | interfere<br>3:11 10:5 | irve<br>2:15 5:6      |\n| 22:16 24:16 29:3      | 164:6                 | interference<br>3:9    | 164:24 165:16         |\n| 29:7 30:22,24         | institutions<br>64:23 | internal<br>25:6       | island<br>176:15,21   |\n| 31:3,9,12 58:10       | instructed<br>43:7,9  | 80:14                  | issue<br>27:23 73:6   |\n| 59:6,16 69:24         | instructing<br>26:21  | internally<br>13:10    | 75:10 82:23           |\n| 85:7 94:4 98:11       | 26:23 27:12           | interpreter<br>127:14  | 124:23,23 150:5       |\n| 99:11,17 104:11       | instruction<br>29:10  | interrelated<br>113:7  | issued<br>54:7        |\n| 105:3,7,12 110:6      | instructor<br>18:5    | interrupt<br>41:8      | issues<br>18:3 27:24  |\n| 116:9 124:10,14       | instructs<br>9:21     | introduce<br>174:16    | 40:24 44:8 52:6       |\n| 124:16,20 127:5       | insufficient<br>8:25  | investigate<br>102:14  | 53:15 72:3 110:11     |\n| 133:2 135:2           | insurance<br>69:14    | 105:17 110:25          | 147:20 174:6          |\n| 136:13 137:3,12       | 107:8 117:10          | 113:10 124:17          | 182:12                |\n| 137:19 138:3,7        | 121:17,18,22,24       | 168:19                 |                       |\n|                       |                       |                        |                       |\n\n85\n\n| [item - know] |\n|---------------|\n|---------------|\n\n| item 55:5 61:16,20       | 36:1 37:1 38:1     | 149:1 150:1 151:1 | keypunch<br>98:19   |\n|--------------------------|--------------------|-------------------|---------------------|\n| 63:11,18 64:13           | 39:1 40:1 41:1     | 152:1 153:1 154:1 | keypunched 98:16    |\n| 66:12 68:6,16            | 42:1 43:1 44:1     | 155:1 156:1 157:1 | kids                |\n| 73:15,20 80:16,21        | 45:1 46:1 47:1,24  | 158:1 159:1 160:1 | 138:25              |\n| 82:7 83:6,19             | 48:1,2,11,25 49:1  | 161:1 162:1 163:1 | kind 20:22 88:24    |\n| 84:11,24 85:18,22        | 50:1 51:1 52:1     | 164:1 165:1 166:1 | 116:17 118:17       |\n| 86:2,6 87:7,21           | 53:1 54:1 55:1     | 167:1 168:1 169:1 | 122:12 134:22       |\n| 88:15,20 89:19           | 56:1 57:1 58:1     | 170:1 171:1 172:1 | 188:4<br>kings      |\n| 91:5 92:19 94:14         | 59:1 60:1 61:1     | 173:1 174:1 175:1 | 45:20 105:6<br>knew |\n| 94:15,16 95:4,7,23       | 62:1 63:1 64:1     | 176:1 177:1 178:1 | 113:9 178:16,18     |\n| 95:24 96:2 97:11         | 65:1 66:1 67:1     | 179:1 180:1 181:1 | 182:22              |\n| 97:13 103:11,12          | 68:1 69:1 70:1     | 182:1 183:1 184:1 | know 7:16 9:10      |\n| 103:13,14 104:2,2        | 71:1 72:1 73:1     | 185:1,7 186:15    | 22:4 30:12 31:7     |\n| 111:20 113:17            | 74:1 75:1 76:1     | 187:3             | 31:17 33:19 34:13   |\n| 127:22 142:14            | 77:1 78:1 79:1     | 1:6<br>jam        | 34:18 36:7 38:16    |\n| 144:12,20 146:12         | 80:1 81:1 82:1     | january<br>161:18 | 38:16,22 39:13      |\n| 152:4                    | 83:1 84:1 85:1     | 13:8 31:25<br>10  | 41:4 43:18 47:3     |\n| 89:16 96:21<br>items     | 86:1 87:1 88:1     | 49:16 50:0 56:5   | 50:3 52:3,21,22     |\n| 97:24,24,25 98:7         | 89:1 90:1 91:1     | 56:24 112:17      | 53:9 57:23 58:2,3   |\n| 99:12 101:3,12,15        | 92:1 93:1,12,14,22 | joint 86:13       | 58:12 60:4,9,25     |\n| 102:5,22 103:22          | 94:1 95:1 96:1     | 2:22<br>jon       | 62:21 64:9 65:16    |\n| 107:13 119:16,18         | 97:1 98:1 99:1     | jonathan 4:2      | 66:3,5,23,24 67:6   |\n| 119:23 121:8,11          | 100:1 101:1 102:1  | judge 29:9,13     | 72:19,23 76:7,17    |\n| 132:7 136:19,25          | 103:1 104:1 105:1  | 87:16             | 77:7,10,12,13       |\n| 137:13 160:11            | 106:1 107:1 108:1  | judges 22:14      | 79:10,12,13 80:14   |\n| 163:6,19                 | 109:1 110:1 111:1  | judgment 37:22    | 83:23 84:5,10       |\n| J                        | 111:4,8 112:1      | 102:4 136:15      | 86:14 89:9,11,20    |\n| 2:10,15 5:21 6:5         | 113:1 114:1 115:1  | 17:9<br>june      | 89:25 90:4 103:25   |\n| J<br>jalbert 1:15 3:1,18 | 116:1 117:1 118:1  | justice 64:23     | 104:3,4 107:10      |\n| 4:1 5:1 6:1,5,14         | 119:1 120:1 121:1  | justify<br>148:15 | 109:19 111:24       |\n| 7:1 8:1 9:1 10:1         | 122:1 123:1 124:1  | k                 | 115:3 116:3,3,4,5   |\n| 10:14,16,19 11:1         | 125:1 126:1 127:1  | keep 41:2 52:16   | 116:5,14,17 117:8   |\n| 12:11 13:1 14:1          | 128:1,24 129:1,11  | 59:14 107:12      | 117:8,10,20 118:7   |\n| 15:1 16:1 17:1           | 129:14 130:1       | 124:17            | 120:21 121:13       |\n| 18:1 19:1 20:1           | 131:1,16,20 132:1  | keeping 42:11     | 122:23,24 123:3     |\n| 21:1 22:1 23:1           | 133:1 134:1 135:1  | keith 20:6        | 125:8,13,20         |\n| 24:1 25:1 26:1           | 136:1 137:1 138:1  | ken<br>9:17 13:6  | 126:20 127:12       |\n| 27:1 28:1 29:1           | 139:1,24 140:1,7   | 14:16,21,24       | 145:15 150:11       |\n| 30:1 31:1 32:1,13        | 141:1 142:1 143:1  | kenneth 2:10 5:3  | 151:18,21 152:2     |\n| 32:18 33:1 34:1          | 144:1 145:1 146:1  | kept 7:17 162:10  | 152:13 154:7        |\n| 34:23 35:1,8,12          | 147:1,10,15 148:1  |                   | 157:21 159:3,21     |\n|                          |                    |                   |                     |\n\n# [know - llp's]\n\n| 161:2,15 166:21      | 122:13 124:4<br>lago | 160:5<br>legitimate                                                                                                                                                                   | liquidate<br>171:5    |\n|----------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|\n| 168:11 169:4,5,17    | 124:21               | lenaya    1:19 4:5                                                                                                                                                                    | liquidated 88:2       |\n| 170:13 171:7         | lamp 126:8,20        | 188:6,21                                                                                                                                                                              | list 7:17 53:6        |\n| 172:16,19 173:7      | 127:16,20 179:14     | 20:20 21:7<br>lenders                                                                                                                                                                 | 64:22 87:6 90:4       |\n| 173:20,25 175:5      | 179:15,24            | lengthy<br>58:24                                                                                                                                                                      | 107:4 154:4           |\n| 176:2 177:3,7        | land 113:16          | letter 31:16,22                                                                                                                                                                       | 155:19,20 157:24      |\n| 179:11 181:8,9,11    | language 114:23      | 32:5 43:12 75:13                                                                                                                                                                      | 159:23 172:7          |\n| 181:22 182:5,12      | large   30:20 59:8   | 76:3                                                                                                                                                                                  | 173:4                 |\n| 182:18,20,21         | 78:5                 | level 53:12 72:25                                                                                                                                                                     | listed 12:3 72:19     |\n| 184:7,18             | 2:5 4:18<br>aura     | 94:14 149:23                                                                                                                                                                          | 108:12 111:25         |\n| knowing 29:4         | 6:12 103:3,6         | રેતે રહ્યારે રહ્યા હતા. આ ગામના પાકની ખેતી કરવામાં આવે છે. આ ગામના લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી ખેતી કરવામાં આવેલું એક  ગામના લોકોનો મુખ્ય વ્યવસાય ખેતી ખેતી કરવામાં આવેલું એક<br>levels | 114:14 122:12         |\n| knowledge 12:15      | law 22:13 39:18      | liabilities 30:23                                                                                                                                                                     | 128:3                 |\n| 12:19 41:3 59:9      | 112:15 134:7         | 94:3 111:17                                                                                                                                                                           | listen<br>124:7       |\n| 62:17 63:3.4         | lawyer 43:18 46:8    | 164:10,12                                                                                                                                                                             | listened<br>123:15    |\n| 91:10 102:10         | 86:20 102:17         | liability 157:5,6                                                                                                                                                                     | 108:13<br>listing     |\n| 121:15 122:7         | 113:25 138:20        | life<br>169:23                                                                                                                                                                        | 160:23                |\n| 123:17,20,22         | 139:14 178:23        | likelihood<br>82:4                                                                                                                                                                    | litigation<br>19:6    |\n| 126:9 127:20         | lawyer's<br>40:7     | limitations 111:15                                                                                                                                                                    | 22:4,7,11,11 40:6     |\n| 128:7,21 133:20      | lawyers 22:20        | limited 5:17 90:7                                                                                                                                                                     | 77:9881:25 82:5       |\n| 140:12 152:10,20     | 25:12,14,16 39:21    | 163:9 178:17                                                                                                                                                                          | 85:19 88:2 127:23     |\n| 154:9 158:3          | 51:17 82:18 95:5     | line   5:13 44:18,18                                                                                                                                                                  | 128:15,17 170:19      |\n| 172:21 174:18        | 96:23 102:7 110:8    | 61:15,20 63:11,18                                                                                                                                                                     | 170:25 175:14         |\n| 184:15               | 125:17 126:2         | 64:12 66:12 68:5                                                                                                                                                                      | 178:18                |\n| 47:14<br>knows       | 128:6 132:24         | 68:16 73:15,19                                                                                                                                                                        | little<br>14:19 16:25 |\n| kwok<br>1:5 2:9 3:19 | 136:16 139:14        | 80:16,21 82:7                                                                                                                                                                         | 21:25 24:3 46:17      |\n| 5:5 11:6 25:21,24    | 150:20 155:23        | 83:6,19 84:11,24                                                                                                                                                                      | 89:12,12              |\n| 32:16 35:9 94:4      | 158:3 159:2          | 85:17,22 86:2,6                                                                                                                                                                       | 146:22 150:18<br>live |\n| 102:6,23 103:14      | 170:18 172:22        | 87:7,21 88:15,20                                                                                                                                                                      | lives<br>118:15       |\n| 104:9 111:18         | 174:6                | 89:16,19 91:5                                                                                                                                                                         | 149:16,22             |\n| 119:24 122:16        | lead 51:5            | 92:19 94:14,16,22                                                                                                                                                                     | living 114:8          |\n| 129:2 138:23         | learn 30:5,7         | 95:3,7,13,15 96:2                                                                                                                                                                     | 129:22 133:15         |\n| 139:2 140:8 143:2    | leave<br>152:24,25   | 96:16,21 97:11                                                                                                                                                                        | 134:9 136:17          |\n| 147:17               | leaving 41:11        | 99:12 103:12,13                                                                                                                                                                       | 140:13 153:17         |\n| kwok's<br>30:3       | 102:7 144:4<br>left  | 111:19 132:7                                                                                                                                                                          | 159:8 183:3,11,12     |\n| 119:10 145:17        | legal 2:22 101:8     | 136:19,25 137:13                                                                                                                                                                      | 184:5                 |\n| -                    | 105:9 106:6          | 146:12 152:4                                                                                                                                                                          | llc 2:12 75:24        |\n| 5:21 6:5 23:16<br>-  | 113:15 114:7,25      | 159:14,15 163:6                                                                                                                                                                       | 126:21                |\n|                      | 153:8                | 163:19                                                                                                                                                                                | llp 1:18 2:3,4,8      |\n| 186:2                | legally 76:2         | lines 95:19 104:4                                                                                                                                                                     | 3:24                  |\n| lack<br>63:5         | 168:14               | 126:18                                                                                                                                                                                | llp's<br>10:24        |\n| 119:7,10<br>lady     |                      |                                                                                                                                                                                       |                       |\n|                      |                      |                                                                                                                                                                                       |                       |\n\n#### **[loan - massachusetts]**\n\n| loan<br>63:23 64:2    | lowey<br>1:15 7:9   | lynch<br>1:19 4:5                  | major<br>19:3 67:2   |\n|-----------------------|---------------------|------------------------------------|----------------------|\n| 65:11,15,19,22,25     | 10:25 13:24 15:16   | 188:6,21                           | 89:15                |\n| 66:6,15 68:2          | 17:12 18:22,25      | m                                  | makenzie<br>2:6 4:24 |\n| 70:16                 | 20:6,10,15 21:16    | macdonald<br>49:19                 | 34:21 146:7          |\n| loans<br>64:5,10 66:3 | 21:21 22:24 23:6    | maid<br>118:8 145:4                | making<br>73:11      |\n| located<br>3:24 101:5 | 23:18,25 24:17      | 145:4 158:24                       | 101:14 102:3         |\n| 113:19                | 25:7 26:3 30:13     | maids<br>145:4                     | 113:3 153:7          |\n| location<br>123:21    | 31:15 36:8,18       | mail<br>26:9,13,13                 | 167:13 184:10,16     |\n| lodge<br>101:17       | 37:3,24 38:21       | 30:19 32:17 34:3                   | manager<br>50:8,13   |\n| long<br>15:5 137:18   | 39:4,17 43:7 48:8   | 35:11,19 37:18                     | managers<br>50:16    |\n| 139:15 160:20         | 48:20 49:4,18       | 38:6 39:7,9 41:17                  | 51:19                |\n| 165:22                | 50:2,15,20 56:19    |                                    | managing<br>51:4     |\n| look<br>31:25 35:15   | 57:2 58:15,21       | 104:24 106:9                       | 70:16                |\n| 40:8 48:11 82:16      | 59:15,25 61:15,19   | 129:9,10,15,17,24                  | mandarin<br>57:18    |\n| 111:23 152:15         | 64:12 65:9,13       | 130:11 131:15                      | 174:20               |\n| 174:7 178:13          | 66:10 67:13,24      | 139:23 141:2                       | mar<br>122:13 124:4  |\n| looked<br>13:22 70:7  | 71:12,18 72:17      | 147:9 151:13                       | 124:21               |\n| 133:16 136:14         | 73:19 76:10,25      | 152:9 160:18                       | march<br>23:22 45:8  |\n| 163:21 173:22,25      | 78:16 80:20 82:4    | 162:19 169:4                       | 72:10,10 73:6        |\n| 174:8 181:21          | 83:5 84:17,22       | 173:15 180:10,19                   | 122:25 134:15        |\n| looking<br>14:3 22:14 | 85:25 87:20,23      | 181:25 182:2,4                     | 137:22 155:17,18     |\n| 22:16 69:17           | 93:3 94:6,10 95:3   | 187:6,7,11,12,13                   | 156:16,18            |\n| 136:17 142:15         | 96:20 97:10,16      | 187:14                             | mark<br>7:6 35:7     |\n| 154:22 162:20         | 98:6 99:5 100:8     | mails<br>13:11,23                  | 131:9                |\n| 172:4 175:18,23       | 101:13 102:3        | 14:2,4 15:20 27:9                  | marked<br>10:16      |\n| 175:24                | 109:6,11 112:16     | 27:10 49:22 59:11                  | 32:13,18 35:12       |\n| looks<br>107:5 132:5  | 112:17,20 122:15    | 99:19 104:23                       | 47:24 48:2 93:12     |\n| loose<br>132:7        | 124:9 125:22        | 112:24 163:8<br>180:8,22 181:21    | 93:14 111:4,8        |\n| lose<br>75:19         | 128:10 135:20       | main<br>2:13 25:2,3                | 128:24 129:11        |\n| losses<br>78:12       | 136:22 144:21       | 163:12                             | 131:7,16,20          |\n| lot<br>42:10 47:11    | 149:11 163:17       | maine<br>176:17,23                 | 139:24 140:7         |\n| 68:18 69:24           | lowey's<br>12:15,22 | maintain<br>17:25                  | 147:10,15            |\n| 104:25 112:13,14      | 44:13 55:15 67:9    | 54:3 91:7 92:10                    | markedly<br>41:20    |\n| 122:3 127:8           | 106:3 111:20        | maintained                         | marking<br>10:13     |\n| 168:23,24 178:18      | 112:8 134:21        | 156:21                             | marriage<br>188:15   |\n| lots<br>99:13,14      | 135:16 140:23       |                                    | married<br>142:25    |\n| 106:21 113:10         | lp<br>4:20          | maintaining<br>63:19<br>64:16 91:5 | mary<br>13:8 31:24   |\n| 167:19 169:21         | lunch<br>123:4      | maintenance                        | 49:16 56:4,24        |\n| 178:2,2               | luxury<br>115:16,23 | 107:8 144:22                       | 112:17               |\n| low<br>53:12          | 116:13              |                                    | massachusetts<br>6:9 |\n|                       |                     | 145:6 158:23                       | 176:13,16,22         |\n|                       |                     |                                    |                      |\n\n85\n\n# [materialize - monthly]\n\n| materialize 52:7      | meeting 16:16,17   | met 6:11 16:13,18   | mitchell 25:17,20  |\n|-----------------------|--------------------|---------------------|--------------------|\n| materializes<br>60:12 | 45:14,15 46:16,25  | 16:19 30:18 58:15   | 25:25 26:10 31:4   |\n| 150:19<br>materials   | 47:13 51:15 69:5   | 125:15,16           | 31:8 32:9 56:18    |\n| matt 45:6,15 46:9     | 116:2 123:15       | method<br>152:22    | 57:4 59:4,4,18     |\n| 49:15,15 50:4,7       | 126:13 127:10      | methodology         | 99:3,8 102:11      |\n| 56:24 112:17          | meetings 46:19     | 111:15              | 103:17 104:12,16   |\n| 129:18,19 154:4       | 47:12              | mezzanine<br>167:23 | 105:4,13 106:7     |\n| 160:17 181:18         | melissa 25:18,23   | microphone<br>3:11  | 109:24 112:15      |\n| matter 1:16 3:18      | 26:2,10 30:2,6     | 165:2               | 124:2 129:18       |\n| 6:23 20:8 41:9        | 31:4,8 32:9 56:16  | microphones 3:6     | 135:23 139:8       |\n| 43:8 46:4 49:17       | 56:17 57:3 59:3,4  | middle<br>113:14    | 143:14 156:3       |\n| 50:21 51:6 53:12      | 59:10,17 99:2,7    | midnight 162:14     | 157:16 181:5       |\n| 67:13 76:5 81:25      | 102:11,18 103:17   | million 126:8       | 148:4<br>mk        |\n| 90:9 115:25 129:2     | 104:11,15 105:4    | 154:13 164:12       | moment 62:24       |\n| 145:6 147:17          | 105:13 106:7       | miltenberger 2:19   | 153:12             |\n| 151:23 160:25         | 109:25 110:18      | 5:14,16 28:13,14    | monetize<br>120:24 |\n| 174:10 188:17         | 112:15 124:2       | 29:23 41:7,15       | 54:21<br>money     |\n| matters 7:2 14:2      | 129:19 135:23      | miltenberger's      | 62:14 78:4 134:18  |\n| 40:2 88:22 98:20      | 139:8 143:13       | 29:21               | 153:24 177:4       |\n| 13:7 56:4<br>matthew  | 148:3 152:12       | mind 27:14 34:18    | monies<br>136:6    |\n| mcdonald<br>15:18     | 156:2 157:16       | 34:24 36:20 87:5    | monitor<br>92:14   |\n| 131:2<br>mckenzie     | 160:16 174:5       | 99:20 164:21        | monitoring 91:13   |\n| meals<br>141:9,10     | 180:9,17 182:3     | mindy<br>50:5       | 72:15<br>month     |\n| 144:15                | member<br>55:7     | 46:8<br>mine        | 118:21 161:7       |\n| mean 17:16 21:9       | 172:12             | minimum 32:8        | 184:2              |\n| 39:24 44:23 60:14     | membership         | 67:7 77:14 128:6    | monthly 45:6       |\n| 83:12 86:8 87:9       | 122:13,17 124:5    | 161:7<br>minor      | 46:11 51:12 67:8   |\n| 96:11 110:4           | 113:12<br>memories | minute 11:13 33:3   | 68:7,11,18,23 69:7 |\n| 116:14 130:19         | memory 66:2,9      | 147:24              | 69:10,12 70:2,15   |\n| 138:14 149:2          | 115:22 127:8,9     | 14:20<br>minutes    | 70:18 71:2,3,8,13  |\n| 175:14 177:19         | 141:20 159:17      | 89:11               | 72:3,20 105:21     |\n| means 8:3 82:14       | menial 170:2,7     | minutiae 89:14      | 106:12,16 107:14   |\n| 144:3 151:2           | mentioned 14:15    | miscommunicati      | 107:22,25 108:20   |\n| meant 22:7 63:12      | 15:15 18:4 19:24   | 135:4               | 116:22 117:14,16   |\n| 159:12                | 22:23 24:11 25:23  | missed 23:11        | 118:11 122:16,21   |\n| media 3:16 120:19     | 29:25 49:14,19     | missing 32:2 81:9   | 123:7 124:6,11     |\n| 120:23,24             | 54:14 57:3,14      | 110:15              | 125:5,16 130:14    |\n| mediation 171:3       | 60:13 73:22 87:8   | 159:24<br>mistake   | 130:21 132:2,25    |\n| medications 10:4      | 92:4 100:7 126:16  | misunderstood       | 134:9,24 135:10    |\n| 16:15 45:22<br>meet   | 165:18             | 56:22               | 147:8 148:7,16,24  |\n| 72:5                  |                    |                     | 149:3,24 151:25    |\n|                       |                    |                     |                    |\n\n# [monthly - objection]\n\n| 154:20 155:12,15     | 116:4 138:10          | 115:25 116:15        | 136:12 141:17        |\n|----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|\n| 157:11,19 160:4,8    | 173:4,8,23 174:9      | 146:22 156:13        | 145:2 153:6          |\n| 160:24 161:11,16     | 182:6,14              | 173:18 176:14,16     | 158:15               |\n| 161:17,23 162:2      | named<br>119:7        | 176:23 188:3,7       | numerous 44:5        |\n| 163:5,13,20 168:9    | 136:22<br>names       | 14:22<br>night       | 59:11 101:3          |\n| 169:7,11 184:19      | 107:12<br>natural     | 78:7<br>nol's        | 112:24               |\n| months<br>72:7       | nature<br>52:21       | nonsense 162:11      | 5:16<br>ny           |\n| 161:25 183:20        | 168:13 183:16         | normal<br>8:17 77:19 | 0                    |\n| mor 72:11 108:14     | 136:3<br>nearly       | 179:3                |                      |\n| 137:22               | necessarily 83:24     | normally 109:15      | 23:16 78:11<br>0     |\n| mor's<br>170:6       | necessary 12:20       | notary 1:19 5:23     | 186:2                |\n| morning 3:3 6:10     | 63:21 75:25 80:18     | 186:22 188:6         | o'melveny 1:17       |\n| 14:20,22             | 85:18 93:2 100:23     | note 3:5 29:20       | 2:3 3:24 4:19,22     |\n| mortgage 77:19       | 112:7 169:21          | 35:24 41:11          | 4:25 6:13 13:18      |\n| mother<br>118:17     | 8:23 9:9<br>need      | 145:19               | 100:5 103:7          |\n| motion<br>14:9 28:25 | 36:14 37:11,20        | noted 29:18          | 4:7 7:25<br>oath     |\n| 38:15,20 89:7        | 40:12,15,23 42:10     | 14:6,7,7<br>notes    | object 129:25        |\n| 90:10,16 168:6       | 47:4 85:9 124:19      | 51:10,11 100:9,13    | objected 30:20       |\n| 6:24<br>motions      | 127:4 143:3 156:9     | 100:14,19 101:3      | objecting<br>80:19   |\n| 181:12               | 163:14 166:20,23      | 111:7,14,24          | 12:4,24<br>objection |\n| motor 119:5          | 169:18 170:10,15      | 112:12 113:4         | 24:20 26:16 27:15    |\n| motorcycles          | 171:14                | 121:6 148:4          | 28:24 29:22 34:10    |\n| 115:17               | needed 30:22,25       | 187:10               | 37:16 39:5 57:22     |\n| 75:14<br>move        | 44:2 46:7 174:4       | notice 6:22,25 7:5   | 58:18 61:4 64:14     |\n| moving 34:24 57:2    | needing 166:10,13     | 7:12 10:15,24        | 66:13 77:4 78:21     |\n| 42:22,22<br>multi    | 167:6<br>needs        | 89:10 187:5          | 79:22 81:10,12       |\n| multiple 19:14       | 169:19                | noticing 4:17        | 84:25 88:3,8 91:9    |\n| 42:4 76:4            | negotiated<br>31:14   | november 127:24      | 92:2 93:5 95:9       |\n| multiplied<br>136:7  | 31:15                 | number 3:22 6:24     | 96:10 98:15 99:24    |\n| multiply 183:25      | negotiation<br>31:18  | 19:16 30:21 32:16    | 101:18 102:8         |\n| music<br>120:7,18    | 65:10                 | 62:6 73:4 81:4,15    | 103:24 104:13        |\n| 1:18 2:3<br>myers    | negotiations 171:3    | 93:19 96:8 100:20    | 106:18 108:21        |\n| 3:24 4:19,22,25      | neither<br>58:14      | 110:19,20 132:22     | 111:22 112:22        |\n| 6:13                 | net   19:10,24 78:11  | 133:16,20 134:19     | 113:24 118:4         |\n| n                    | netherland 114:17     | 135:13,18 146:20     | 122:18 126:3         |\n|                      | 115:2                 | 150:9,10 152:14      | 127:7 130:16         |\n| 2:278:11 186:2<br>n  | never 57:6 121:23     | 159:14,15 181:21     | 132:11 133:18        |\n| 187:17               | 1:18,18,21 2:5<br>new | 183:22 187:4         | 141:18 148:20        |\n| name 4:2 6:3,11      | 2:5,10,10,18 3:25     | numbering 97:7       | 149:7 152:11         |\n| 20:5 23:12,13,15     | 3:25 5:23 58:8        | numbers 48:23        | 157:20 166:12,22     |\n| 23:16 27:20 28:22    | 79:15,16 115:8,10     | 97:5 135:21          | 170:12,22 177:25     |\n| 29:5 58:12 102:18    |                       |                      |                      |\n\n# [objections - paragraph]\n\n| objections<br>4:14   | 108:20,23 137:20   | oral 65:18 99:17         | 7:8 11:8,21<br>page |\n|----------------------|--------------------|--------------------------|---------------------|\n| 12:8 14:10 52:20     | 170:24 178:18      | 99:18                    | 33:2,4 48:22,23,24  |\n| 52:22 54:8           | open 47:13 91:7    | orally 106:9             | 49:9,11 55:13,18    |\n| 9:18<br>objects      | 92:10              | 160:18                   | 88:20 93:25 95:18   |\n| obligation 91:22     | opening 63:19      | order 29:15 62:11        | 96:4,25 97:4,8      |\n| observer 45:20       | 64:16 91:5         | 72:23 75:3,5,8           | 105:18,20 106:11    |\n| obtain<br>12:19      | operating 41:21    | 86:9,21 105:5            | 113:13,14 115:12    |\n| obtained 59:17       | 41:24,25 42:11,20  | 54:25<br>ordered         | 119:9,12,20 120:3   |\n| 22:15<br>obtaining   | 42:21 43:3 45:7    | ordinarily 172:5         | 121:3 124:25        |\n| obviously 43:18      | 46:11 51:12 67:8   | ordinary 30:21           | 126:5,10 132:7      |\n| 66:18 87:17 98:17    | 68:7,11,19,23      | 62:7 70:24 156:7         | 140:19 145:20       |\n| 105:8 156:21         | 69:10,12 70:3,6,10 | 156:8 167:18             | 148:3 149:15        |\n| 163:15 173:21        | 70:15,18 71:2,4,8  | 169:22 181:7             | 151:14 152:8        |\n| 174:17<br>occasion   | 71:13 72:4,21      | original<br>150:10       | 157:6 161:19,20     |\n| occasionally         | 78:12 106:12,16    | 152:3 159:20             | 161:20 162:3        |\n| 141:22,24            | 107:22 108:2       | 153:13<br>originally     | 187:3,18            |\n| 113:19<br>occupancy  | 116:22 117:14,16   | 4.9<br>outcome           | pages 161:19,22     |\n| 113:22               | 118:11 122:16,22   | 188:16                   | 162:11              |\n| occur<br>68:3        | 123:8 124:6        | outside 16:22 26:3       | paid 32:24 70:23    |\n| offer<br>18:25       | 130:15,21 132:2    | 26:5,6,14 31:5           | 72:14 73:13 77:25   |\n| office<br>19:16 58:8 | 132:25 134:4,5,9   | 80:4 126:10              | 86:16 108:10,15     |\n| 68:24 69:20 72:12    | 134:24 135:11      | 127:17                   | 118:22 130:24       |\n| 72:22 162:13         | 147:8 149:25       | outstanding 59:24        | 133:3 134:16        |\n| offices<br>1:17      | 151:25 154:20      | overpayment              | 136:7 149:18        |\n| official 93:13,25    | 155:12,15 156:10   | 160:6                    | 151:15 152:21       |\n| 94:21 187:9          | 157:11,19 160:5,8  | owed 81:18,19,20         | 153:24 155:23       |\n| offset<br>78:7       | 160:25 161:11,16   | 114:3<br>owned           | 156:11 158:8        |\n| oh<br>45:10 160:24   | 161:17,23 162:2    | 126:22,25 127:16         | 159:19 160:2,3      |\n| 167:9 173:2          | 163:5,13,20 168:9  | 154:8                    | 173:6 175:4,8,10    |\n| 177:14               | 169:7,12 184:19    | ownership<br>102:12      | 175:19 179:24       |\n| okay 9:7 35:17,22    | operations 127:20  | 107:9                    | 181:10,12 183:4,6   |\n| 71:17 85:17 96:3     | opinion 145:20     | owns 115:5 116:5         | 183:8,14            |\n| 103:2 131:11         | 151:5,7            | p                        | 122:14<br>palm      |\n| 148:2 149:14         | opportunity 2:4    | 2:2,2 23:16              | pans<br>101:23      |\n| 159:6 173:8 181:6    | 4:20 6:14 10:24    | p<br>69:20<br>p&l        | paper 168:23        |\n| 169:3<br>old         | 38:20 75:20 81:4   | 1:15 2:17                | papers 43:17,19     |\n| once 85:11 144:24    | 29:6<br>oppose     | p.c.<br>p.m. 39:10 90:25 | 44:16 45:3 46:3,6   |\n| 154:10               | opposed 74:6       | 139:21 140:4             | 126:14              |\n| ones 60:9 69:23      | 103:14             | 165:8,12 185:5,8         | paragraph<br>113:2  |\n| ongoing 52:6         | opposite<br>159:24 | pacific 2:3 4:19         | 113:2               |\n| 88:14 105:21         |                    | 6:13 10:23               |                     |\n|                      |                    |                          |                     |\n\n85\n\n**[paramount - plan]**\n\n| paramount<br>29:3     | pass<br>44:9 130:25 | people<br>5:15 16:2 | 139:9,11,12           |\n|-----------------------|---------------------|---------------------|-----------------------|\n| parcel<br>111:25      | 139:10              | 19:8,17,19 28:19    | 140:24 157:17         |\n| parents<br>42:3       | passed<br>105:7,8   | 45:22 53:4 58:24    | 178:20 179:3          |\n| part<br>21:22 37:17   | patents<br>120:4,13 | 102:17 117:24       | 181:23,24 182:2       |\n| 43:17 51:11 69:9      | pax<br>100:6        | 118:7 141:24        | 183:9,10 184:4        |\n| 96:9,12,17 97:9,13    | pay<br>19:13 54:22  | 142:2,4 168:24      | person's<br>27:23     |\n| 97:24 100:12          | 55:3 68:2 118:20    | 175:16              | 182:5                 |\n| 105:20 111:25         | 154:9 171:6         | percent<br>118:13   | personal<br>95:12     |\n| 112:3 132:21          | payable<br>69:21    | 138:19,21 139:4     | 97:25 101:4           |\n| 144:7 170:21          | payables<br>167:24  | 141:9,11,13,14      | 102:10                |\n| 171:7,9 172:4         | payee<br>138:11     | 142:7,8,9,12,16,23  | personally<br>23:9    |\n| 181:6                 | payees<br>137:7     | 143:6,8 144:2,5,6   | 65:17                 |\n| participate<br>47:2   | paying<br>107:17    | 144:13,14 145:11    | perspective<br>31:23  |\n| 47:17 60:8,12         | 146:24              | 146:4,5,11,11,21    | 77:16 85:7            |\n| participated<br>51:13 | payment<br>33:17    | percentage<br>136:6 | pertaining<br>146:21  |\n| 58:23 84:3            | 92:22 106:23        | 136:8 138:13        | petition<br>32:22     |\n| participating         | 108:22 117:9        | 139:5 147:7         | 33:5,9,16,20 35:24    |\n| 45:21                 | 133:3,25 134:11     | percentages         | 36:3,8 74:13 84:6     |\n| participation         | 146:19 154:7,13     | 136:15 144:19       | 92:22 132:19          |\n| 45:12 47:10,20        | 154:15 156:24       | perform<br>59:15    | 133:3,3,25 160:2,2    |\n| particular<br>40:5,12 | 159:17 175:13       | 66:11 91:25 93:3    | 160:3,3 172:5,20      |\n| 40:16 42:19 105:5     | 179:4               | 96:20 97:10,16,21   | 174:25 176:5,8        |\n| 117:17 118:6,23       | payments<br>83:22   | 98:5,6 114:13       | 177:18,24 183:4       |\n| 130:17 168:25         | 84:6 86:16 93:2     | 125:22              | 183:11,14,16          |\n| particularly<br>14:9  | 132:16,19 133:7,9   | performed<br>80:20  | 184:5,12              |\n| 112:12                | 133:10 134:2,6,16   | 83:5 88:10 89:18    | phone<br>15:3 25:11   |\n| parties<br>3:14 66:22 | 134:22 154:5        | 97:20 121:10,14     | 25:15 28:8 47:20      |\n| 84:23 87:12           | 156:25 157:24       | period<br>72:10     | 58:24 59:2,11         |\n| 104:25 105:2          | 172:5 183:17,17     | 82:16 86:20 90:25   | 104:24 143:15         |\n| 117:6 130:24          | 184:11              | 117:18 129:22       | 167:8 181:19          |\n| 133:12 188:14         | payroll<br>42:7     | 133:11 140:13       | phones<br>3:10        |\n| partner<br>19:12      | pays<br>122:4       | 151:15 153:25       | phrase<br>110:2       |\n| 20:3 51:3             | pc<br>10:25 48:9,20 | 154:20 155:11,17    | physically<br>123:5   |\n| partnership<br>74:10  | 49:4                | 156:12 157:25       | pick<br>3:7           |\n| 75:23                 | pdf<br>95:18        | 159:9               | place<br>3:10,14      |\n| parts<br>79:12        | pearl<br>2:18       | perjury<br>8:8      | 45:22 47:15 53:8      |\n| party<br>4:7 20:22    | penalty<br>8:8      | person<br>5:12,15   | 77:6 82:20 83:25      |\n| 44:4 53:10 99:11      | pendency<br>70:9    | 15:18,21 26:15,17   | 175:24 186:11         |\n| 102:14 119:24         | 117:19              | 49:20 50:17 51:5    | plan<br>86:6,11,13,24 |\n| 122:6 173:12          | pending<br>9:11     | 54:4 103:15         | 87:15,24 122:2        |\n| 184:10                | 81:25 82:5          | 129:18 130:10,10    | 169:17                |\n|                       |                     |                     |                       |\n\n[planned - process]\n\n| planned 54:19        | 120:17             | prepare<br>13:4       | previously 6:10     |\n|----------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|---------------------|\n| 86:14 88:7<br>plans  | possibly<br>118:4  | 24:13,14 71:11,12     | 14:23 85:20         |\n| 125:3                | 169:6 171:17       | 71:23 95:3 100:9      | 104:10 119:18       |\n| platforms<br>120:8   | post 20:17 32:22   | 173:5                 | 130:4               |\n| 120:20               | 33:5,9,16,20 35:24 | prepared 13:10,14     | primary<br>143:10   |\n| play   52:10 169:18  | 36:3,8 61:11       | 24:15 31:19 71:3      | principal 21:17     |\n| 169:20 171:7         | 63:12 133:3 160:2  | 71:19 86:12           | 22:24 23:3 37:23    |\n| 172:2,3,3            | 174:25 176:5,8     | 161:15 173:18         | 50:5,10,16,25 51:8  |\n| plays 52:11          | 177:18,24 183:11   | 183:12                | printed 119:11      |\n| pleadings 14:8       | 184:5,12           | preparer 135:4,6      | prior   82:17 83:23 |\n| please<br>3:5,9 4:15 | posted 120:8,19    | 136:9 173:4 174:9     | priority<br>81:7    |\n| 5:10,19 6:3 8:19     | potential 24:10    | preparing 8:12        | 29:2<br>privacy     |\n| 9:5,11 11:8 23:14    | 52:9 65:11,15,22   | 15:6 45:6,11,12       | private<br>3:7      |\n| 28:11 33:2 35:15     | 85:21              | 46:14 55:24 56:7      | privilege 39:23,25  |\n| 67:22 148:5,14       | potentially 27:20  | 57:24 58:21 60:23     | 40:17 83:15         |\n| 165:2                | 66:678:17 90:14    | 66:20,21 84:4         | privileged 41:3     |\n| plus   72:10 106:7,7 | 101:23<br>pots     | 86:18 94:7,11         | 14:24<br>probably   |\n| 135:18 140:17        | practice 121:21    | 105:11 109:6          | 20:20 24:11 28:9    |\n| 2:14<br>po           | practitioner       | 110:12 112:9,21       | 32:9 42:10 45:4     |\n| pohl 23:10,15,17     | 176:13             | 132:4 155:3,6         | 52:15,16,19 54:5    |\n| 23:24 24:4           | pre   74:13 84:6   | 161:2169:11           | 106:8,8,9 110:17    |\n| point 39:14 40:18    | 92:22 132:19       | 170:5,6               | 116:23 137:8        |\n| 48:14 52:20 60:6     | 133:3,25 160:2,3,3 | presence 120:25       | 138:21 144:5        |\n| 61:8 65:25 67:10     | 172:5,20 177:18    | present 2:21 4:10     | 170:23 176:19       |\n| 75:3 81:11 92:20     | 177:24 183:4,14    | presenting 155:13     | problem 80:3        |\n| 106:17 123:23        | 183:16             | presidential<br>19:19 | 146:25 160:24       |\n| 124:13 130:14        | precursor<br>17:11 | presumably<br>54:22   | 162:16              |\n| 153:22 166:3         | predicated 72:3    | 68:20                 | 11:3<br>procedure   |\n| 171:10               | 157:10             | presuming 114:6       | 17:19               |\n| points 25:2 55:17    | predict 53:7,13    | presupposed           | procedures<br>7:23  |\n| policies 121:17      | 33:15<br>prefer    | 55:10                 | 70:13               |\n| policy 121:18,22     | preference 33:9    | presupposes 70:15     | proceed 11:20       |\n| 121:24 122:8         | 33:14 82:10,18     | presupposing          | 140:5 165:13        |\n| populated 95:23      | 84:2 171:18        | 66:14                 | proceeding 4:15     |\n| ported 49:23         | preferences 82:16  | pretty 21:11 22:9     | 16:22               |\n| 37:2<br>poses        | preparation 13:20  | 32:7 37:4 44:22       | proceedings 39:19   |\n| possession 37:25     | 15:7 51:9 53:5     | 70:5 179:11           | 39:21,22 115:10     |\n| 38:3 52:14           | 55:19 56:20 60:19  | previous 36:21        | process 38:14       |\n| possible 30:17,25    | 61:9 68:6 73:16    | 38:6 78:7,10          | 40:13 67:21 155:9   |\n| 31:635:25 60:7       | 86:7 112:4 116:22  | 116:8 119:6           | 168:7,22 169:23     |\n| 79:6 82:9 84:12      | 168:10             |                       | 178:11              |\n|                      |                    |                       |                     |\n\n#### [produce - reasoning]\n\n| produce<br>8:13       | 152:16 153:16,25     | d                    | r                    |\n|-----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|----------------------|\n| produced 128:25       | proponent 118:12     | 31:23<br>qpc         | r   2:2 5:21,21 6:5  |\n| 137:19 147:16         | proposed 5:4,7       | quarter   72:8 73:9  | 48:25 186:2 188:2    |\n| 173:12,13,16          | 54:20 111:20         | 73:10                | 167:8 176:10<br>rang |\n| product 46:22         | 139:3 150:21         | quarterly 68:7       | 15:13<br>range       |\n| 83:15,17              | protect 75:9 89:16   | 71:19,21,25 72:18    | 29:5<br>rank         |\n| profession<br>166:3   | 179:4                | queries 158:18       | rarely 42:21 81:18   |\n| professional 17:14    | protected<br>29:14   | question    8:20 9:5 | rate 67:10,11        |\n| 17:17,25 18:8,12      | protection 83:18     | 9:7,11,19,20 27:4    | reached 23:17,24     |\n| 33:11 37:22 77:17     | protective 29:15     | 27:6 28:9 34:8,12    | 28:20 161:12         |\n| 92:21 156:4 158:3     | prove 86:22          | 34:16,18,19 36:17    | 162:12,25            |\n| 163:3 166:7           | provide 22:18        | 36:19,25 38:17       | reaching 161:13      |\n| 175:19,20             | 92:25 171:11,15      | 53:17 56:9 83:20     | read 27:6 34:12      |\n| 14:8<br>professionals | provided 13:14       | 94:19,21 96:17       | 57:18 65:24 90:16    |\n| 30:21 54:9,23         | 59:5 98:11 99:10     | 101:12 105:16        | 120:16 147:25        |\n| 57:9 62:8 68:25       | 117:3 130:9          | 108:3,8 110:7,8      | reads 55:18 61:8     |\n| 77:25 156:5,5,6,7     | 140:24 158:15        | 113:14 114:14        | 63:18 80:17 88:20    |\n| 156:8 157:2,3         | 92:21<br>providers   | 115:13 116:21        | 94:20,24 95:11       |\n| 159:25 175:20         | providing 27:14      | 117:4 118:3 119:4    | 105:21 106:12        |\n| 181:8                 | 63:21                | 120:3,12 121:16      | 113:18 115:15        |\n| profile<br>166:10,19  | public 1:20 5:23     | 122:11 124:13        | ready 137:21         |\n| 178:14 179:6,18       | 186:22 188:6         | 126:5 127:22         | real 42:20 77:20     |\n| program 69:12         | pulling 134:14       | 130:18,20 148:19     | 94:22 107:6          |\n| 70:11                 | pullman 2:12 5:7     | 149:6,12,25 150:3    | 113:19,22 114:2,4    |\n| 71:9<br>progress      | 165:17               | 151:19,23 154:2      | 147:6 167:20         |\n| progresses 50:22      | punching<br>99:11    | 155:16 163:10,12     | realized 159:24      |\n| projections 61:10     | punitive<br>164:9    | 163:12 166:14        | really 31:2 74:21    |\n| 61:24,24 86:18        | 117:12<br>purchase   | 177:13,21 181:15     | 133:2 165:4          |\n| 87:10                 | 118:19               | 184:10,12            | 10:8 76:15<br>reason |\n| prominent 60:18       | 117:13<br>purchased  | questions 47:17      | 78:13 89:4 138:22    |\n| promised 179:23       | purposes<br>39:23,25 | 83:21 91:3 99:21     | 142:4,19 143:4,10    |\n| prompted 163:17       | 77:24                | 100:6,23 113:5       | 145:16               |\n| proof   80:24 81:2    | pursuant 10:25       | 119:19,21 129:16     | reasonable 21:13     |\n| 81:21                 | pushed<br>168:23     | 135:25 149:2         | reasonableness       |\n| proofs 80:19          | put 44:18 69:16      | 153:5 158:5          | 109:14 110:3         |\n| properly 136:2        | 131:12 142:7         | 164:15 167:17        | 158:10               |\n| property 94:15,21     | 155:24               | 179:17 184:8,23      | reasonably 53:11     |\n| 95:12 107:7           | 87:18<br>puts        | 165:4<br>quick       | reasoning 29:21      |\n| 113:17 114:2          | putting 109:14       | quickbooks 60:25     | 142:17 143:21        |\n| 120:7,13,15,18        | 180:22               | quickly<br>I રેતે:R  | 144:8,11 145:10      |\n| 122:11 148:5,14       |                      |                      | 145:12,21            |\n\n85\n\n85\n\n#### **[reasons - report]**\n\n| reasons<br>75:2 77:23 | record<br>3:3,15 4:13 | refers<br>84:11 95:13  | relied<br>85:5 104:9 |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------------------|----------------------|\n| 130:3 142:11          | 6:4,11,11 8:12        | 95:17 96:2 114:16      | 177:15 178:6         |\n| 168:15                | 11:13,15,16,20        | 119:4 120:5,12         | relief<br>75:4,6     |\n| recall<br>23:20 32:6  | 28:2,18 32:15         | 121:4,17 122:13        | relies<br>84:22      |\n| 33:8 34:7 44:10       | 41:10 48:5 90:19      | 125:8 126:6,7          | rely<br>39:2 98:13   |\n| 57:21 65:20           | 90:21 91:2 93:18      | 127:23 135:13          | 123:25 139:6         |\n| 126:17 128:4          | 100:4 129:5 130:4     | 144:20                 | 158:14 176:4         |\n| 146:10,13 151:4       | 139:19,21 140:4       | reflect<br>132:10      | 177:23 179:5         |\n| 151:10 161:9          | 156:9 165:4,8,9,12    | 133:8 140:22           | remain<br>106:16,24  |\n| 173:22                | 185:2,5 188:11        | reflected<br>133:14    | 107:18               |\n| receipt<br>78:13      | recorded<br>1:14      | 135:15 152:8           | remains<br>74:12     |\n| receipts<br>52:17     | 3:17                  | reflecting<br>164:5    | 184:14               |\n| 54:3,14,15 63:15      | recording<br>3:13     | refresh<br>36:16       | remember<br>21:14    |\n| 66:25 68:22 86:19     | 8:10                  | regarding<br>15:17     | 24:7 43:14,24        |\n| receivable<br>69:22   | records<br>15:9,20,23 | 16:4,4 24:2,9 25:5     | 59:2 62:22 81:3      |\n| receive<br>57:15      | 40:14 49:22 52:16     | 26:4,11 30:14          | 85:24 87:5 105:2     |\n| 137:10 157:15         | 82:9 84:12,14,18      | 59:21 65:14,19         | 105:5,15 108:7       |\n| 174:24                | 92:19 160:22          | 67:25 102:15           | 109:20 110:8         |\n| received<br>33:20     | 171:16,20 172:17      | 111:16 137:13          | 116:19 117:4         |\n| 92:22 99:17           | recoverable<br>83:2   | 150:3 161:10           | 127:19 130:22        |\n| 104:11 137:13         | recoveries<br>175:15  | 163:4                  | 142:13 146:16        |\n| 139:7 140:6           | rectified<br>135:5    | regret<br>168:2        | 159:13 167:12        |\n| 160:10                | redacted<br>129:17    | rejoin<br>41:14        | 173:10 176:7         |\n| receiving<br>33:9     | 182:6,16,25           | related<br>4:7 19:7    | remind<br>167:10     |\n| 161:9                 | redaction<br>130:6    | 49:21 56:9 61:10       | remotely<br>4:11     |\n| recess<br>90:22       | refer<br>97:4,25      | 90:3 91:4 95:14        | renters<br>107:7     |\n| 139:22                | referenced<br>68:10   | 138:23 143:5,11        | reorganization       |\n| recognize<br>10:20    | 103:11,12,13          | 188:14                 | 86:11 168:21         |\n| 48:15 49:6 93:21      | 119:23 155:5          | relates<br>7:3,8 94:15 | 169:15               |\n| 111:11 140:9          | 159:10,15             | 107:16 111:21          | repair<br>107:8      |\n| 147:20,22             | references<br>63:11   | 173:16                 | 144:22               |\n| recollection<br>36:16 | 113:4,7 119:6         | relating<br>6:23       | repairs<br>158:22    |\n| 44:21 162:24          | referencing<br>65:7   | 70:14                  | repeat<br>9:5 27:3   |\n| recommend<br>73:23    | referred<br>27:5      | relationship           | repeating<br>66:17   |\n| 73:24 74:2 75:7       | 174:5                 | 143:19                 | report<br>40:11 45:7 |\n| 75:17,22 76:11        | referring<br>71:15    | relevance<br>28:21     | 46:11 51:12 54:6     |\n| 80:9 141:10           | 95:20 97:4,7,14       | 88:11                  | 67:8 68:11,19,23     |\n| recommended           | 104:3 120:9           | relevant<br>27:24      | 69:7,10,13 70:3,6    |\n| 144:21                | 132:12 135:9          | 41:4 113:23            | 70:10,15,19 71:2,4   |\n| reconciling<br>80:18  | 150:6 167:16          | 116:21 117:14          | 71:9,19,21,25 72:4   |\n|                       |                       | 123:11                 | 72:18,21 107:22      |\n|                       |                       |                        |                      |\n\n#### **[report - right]**\n\n| 108:2,2,9 117:5,15   | representations      | responds<br>52:4      | 55:13 61:8 88:12      |\n|----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|\n| 118:11 122:16,22     | 59:21                | 149:15                | 111:21 126:14         |\n| 123:8 124:6          | representative       | response<br>35:23     | 175:22                |\n| 130:15,21 132:3      | 180:5                | 115:14                | retrieved<br>31:8,12  |\n| 132:25 134:4,6,24    | represented<br>9:12  | responses<br>12:7     | return<br>53:2,3      |\n| 135:11 144:9         | 20:21 21:10,12       | responsibilities      | 74:23 75:6,8          |\n| 147:8 149:25         | 102:22 113:12        | 21:20 46:10,18        | 76:12,14 77:2,22      |\n| 151:25 154:20        | representing<br>9:16 | responsible<br>20:2   | 77:23 78:14 79:15     |\n| 155:12,15 156:10     | 100:5 181:13         | 98:12                 | 79:17,18 86:23        |\n| 157:12,23,23         | request<br>26:19     | responsive<br>124:15  | 168:9 173:5           |\n| 158:13 159:8,20      | 108:9 163:18         | rest<br>17:24         | returns<br>54:10 74:3 |\n| 160:5,8,25 161:11    | require<br>47:9 60:7 | restrictions<br>153:2 | 74:9 75:24 76:5,6     |\n| 161:16,17 163:5      | required<br>12:14,19 | restroom<br>139:17    | 78:18 79:9,11         |\n| 163:13 184:20        | 17:19,22 54:25       | restructure           | 80:10 169:9 173:3     |\n| reported<br>71:2     | 55:2 70:10 76:2      | 167:22                | 173:6,11,18           |\n| 157:5 160:7          | 89:5 108:14          | restructured          | revealed<br>26:18     |\n| reporter<br>1:20 4:4 | requirement<br>67:7  | 170:16,21             | revealing<br>27:19    |\n| 5:10,19 8:11         | requirements         | restructuring         | 28:22                 |\n| 10:13,18 27:7        | 42:24,24 67:5        | 17:24 18:7 165:19     | revenue<br>80:14      |\n| 32:12,20 35:7,14     | requires<br>68:24    | 166:11,13,16,20       | review<br>27:22       |\n| 47:23 48:4 78:9      | 86:25 89:10          | 166:24 167:7,16       | 43:22 51:23 52:19     |\n| 93:11,16 111:3,10    | reside<br>150:15     | 167:21 170:11,21      | 53:10 60:7 61:9       |\n| 128:23 129:13        | 172:17               | resuming<br>139:23    | 62:12 68:6 72:17      |\n| 131:18,19 140:2      | residence<br>101:5,9 | retain<br>48:8,19     | 73:16 124:20          |\n| 147:12,14 171:13     | 102:5 113:16         | 49:3 181:7            | 125:17 135:24         |\n| 187:15               | 114:6,9 118:6,10     | retained<br>34:6      | 150:19 158:2          |\n| reporting<br>19:18   | 150:13               | 36:22 37:6 39:7       | 162:5 171:19          |\n| 42:23 52:18 54:2     | residences<br>19:14  | 39:15,18,20 72:17     | reviewed<br>13:8,11   |\n| 66:21 67:4 68:8      | 114:14 118:3         | 143:11 187:15         | 62:18,20 81:24        |\n| 108:14 148:24        | resident<br>76:12    | retainer<br>32:22,24  | 84:13,18 109:13       |\n| 149:3 155:6,10       | resides<br>114:5     | 32:25 33:5,10,12      | 110:3 112:24          |\n| reports<br>22:19     | 118:5                | 33:16,20 35:24        | 114:21 141:3          |\n| 66:21 68:7 107:22    | respect<br>21:20     | 36:4,8 126:6          | reviewing<br>80:17    |\n| 116:22 117:16        | 92:25 95:7           | 174:25 175:17         | 82:8 112:11           |\n| 157:19 161:23        | respond<br>89:11     | 176:5,8 177:19,24     | 160:15 171:16         |\n| 162:3 168:9 169:7    | 178:24,24            | retaining<br>34:5     | revising<br>139:5     |\n| 169:12               | responded<br>36:20   | 35:21 36:18 37:3      | rhode<br>176:15,21    |\n| represent<br>30:2    | 65:4                 | 39:4                  | right<br>7:10 10:19   |\n| 129:7 140:16         | responding<br>35:18  | retains<br>74:7 162:6 | 38:19 53:24 55:22     |\n| 144:13 176:17,19     | 51:16                | retention<br>7:8      | 61:3 62:16 63:6       |\n|                      |                      | 43:16,17,19 44:16     | 64:16 70:17 71:6      |\n|                      |                      |                       |                       |\n\n# [right - server]\n\n| 73:4 81:15 84:9      | 178:7 181:3,5                          | 124:25 128:3          | 142:20,24 143:3,5     |\n|----------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|\n| 90:7 94:8 95:21      | rudnick's 126:14                       | 135:5,7,9 136:10      | 143:10,23 159:14      |\n| 98:2 100:11          | 10:25 11:22<br>rule                    | 155:25                | 184:3                 |\n| 126:19 130:11        | 11:2117:5<br>rules                     | scheduled<br>81:14    | 11:23 28:21<br>see    |\n| 134:12 136:19        | 161:3                                  | schedules<br>14:6     | 33:6 35:25 45:22      |\n| 138:5 152:5          | ruling 29:12                           | 30:23 44:22 45:25     | 57:19 61:12 68:8      |\n| 153:17,20 154:22     | 22:258:9<br>run                        | 51:10 55:20,25        | 82:11,25 88:11        |\n| 165:20 169:16        | 67:10.11 178:21                        | 56:14 57:12,17,25     | 95:17 96:6 121:8      |\n| 170:8 173:23         | running 21:23                          | 58:17,22 60:20,24     | 121:19 125:6          |\n| 177:14               | 172:9,10                               | 69:4 100:10           | 132:15 141:2          |\n| rights<br>29:2       | 178:22<br>runs                         | 111:16 112:2,5        | 148:9 151:16          |\n| 113:20<br>road       | 2:6 4:24,24<br>russo                   | 113:6 168:8           | 155:21 159:2,3        |\n| rodeo<br>89:3        | S                                      | 183:13                | 168:5 183:20          |\n| role<br>50:7,12 52:9 | 2:274:10 187:2                         | schindler 13:8        | seeing 57:21          |\n| 53:18 94:6,10        | S                                      | 31:25 49:16 50:9      | 127:19                |\n| 98:11 102:3          | safe<br>123:10                         | 56:5,24 112:18        | 124:10,12<br>seek     |\n| 105:25 106:3         | safety<br>138:24                       | school 17:3.5         | 79:8,12<br>seen       |\n| 112:9 134:21         | 144:10 182:11                          | science<br>17:7       | 109:15 121:23         |\n| 168:11 169:17,20     | 42:7<br>sales                          | scope 43:8 44:12      | 127:24 128:19         |\n| 171:25 172:4         | sanity 158:9                           | 90:13 171:9           | 137:6 145:7 164:8     |\n| roles 23:2 51:18     | 162:4<br>save                          | 164:22<br>scotch      | 164:13                |\n| 157:4<br>roll        | 62:22 79:13<br>SAW                     | scrambling 69:4       | select 75:20          |\n| rolled<br>158:15     | 79:15 126:13                           | 71:11<br>scratch      | 122:6<br>sell         |\n| 4:11 127:12<br>room  | 128:4 153:4                            | 99:16 106:2           | semantics 39:13       |\n| rudnick 2:8 5:4      | 159:23 162:19                          | search<br>15:19,20    | 19:19<br>senators     |\n| 15:21 23:10,16       | 163:13 173:3                           | 49:21 82-25           | 15:21 24:15<br>send   |\n| 24:6,8,18 25:9       | saying 37:9 149:20<br>149:21 162:13    | second 45:16 61:7     | 162:7                 |\n| 26:5,6,11 30:9       |                                        | 114:16 121:6          | sense 38:2 158:4      |\n| 31:20 32:4 38:10     | 33:4 34:15<br>says<br>87:7 91:23 116:6 | 125:2                 | 158:25                |\n| 38:12 39:2,16        |                                        | secret<br>106:21      | sensitive<br>3:6      |\n| 43:23 49:24 56:13    | 116:7 162:7,15                         | 120:14<br>secrets     | sent 13:17 31:20      |\n| 57:4 58:25 59:7      | 184:9,10                               | section<br>75:5 97:17 | 49:24                 |\n| 59:10,17 64:20       | scared 143:16,18<br>143:19             | 105:23 106:4          | 121:6<br>sentence     |\n| 83:18 98:25 99:7     | 20:14                                  | 114:19                | 125:2                 |\n| 102:12,18 103:18     | scenarios<br>59:22<br>schedule         | secure 167:22         | separate 74:4,5,14    |\n| 103:18 104:11,17     | 60:3 71:14 81:14                       | secured 20:19         | 74:22 107:21          |\n| 104:17 105:7,13      |                                        | 21:7 42:15 81:7       | 129:5 131:7 132:7     |\n| 106:6 109:24         | 94:7,20,23 95:12                       | security 33:17        | september 17:10       |\n| 112:14 124:2         | 96:13 98:23 103:9<br>103:23 104:8      | 115:24 118:8,25       | 7:5<br>served         |\n| 126:7 139:7 156:2    |                                        | 133:23 138:16,22      | 13:24 49:22<br>server |\n| 157:15 175:18        | 108:12 109:16,17                       | 138:24 142:14,18      |                       |\n|                      | 109:18 114:2                           |                       |                       |\n\n**[service - started]**\n\n| service<br>92:21      | signature<br>188:21   | someday<br>169:17      | spent<br>21:23        |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|------------------------|-----------------------|\n| 138:11 145:5,5        | signer<br>37:24 52:14 | someone's<br>171:4     | split<br>118:18       |\n| services<br>18:24     | 65:3                  | someplace<br>110:21    | spoke<br>13:5,7 14:15 |\n| 21:21 85:21 90:4      | significant<br>13:9   | son<br>58:9,11,13      | 14:21 16:8 31:2       |\n| set<br>101:7 161:8    | 59:5                  | soon<br>159:4          | 57:6                  |\n| 188:10,19             | significantly         | sorry<br>3:5 7:14      | spoken<br>14:24       |\n| setting<br>47:5 83:17 | 160:14                | 23:11 35:3 41:7        | 174:11,18,22          |\n| settlement<br>78:6    | silverberg<br>13:6    | 83:11 94:19 95:16      | spouse<br>118:14      |\n| 171:2                 | 24:5 33:4 34:4        | 126:4 130:19           | 145:18 150:14         |\n| settlements<br>77:10  | 37:2 38:5 39:6        | 171:13 176:11          | spouse's<br>121:18    |\n| seven<br>75:15        | silverberg's<br>35:19 | sort<br>52:8 55:6      | spreads<br>21:25      |\n| 136:18                | similar<br>113:17     | sorts<br>17:15 42:23   | spreadsheet           |\n| seventh<br>92:19      | simultaneously        | 54:15 167:25           | 135:14 158:6          |\n| shake<br>8:24         | 44:23                 | sound<br>84:9          | 160:19                |\n| shape<br>62:10        | single<br>53:10 75:22 | source<br>62:24        | spring<br>2:17 5:16   |\n| shapes<br>42:2        | sir<br>85:16 100:6,14 | 77:12 87:25 105:2      | 27:17,18 28:17,23     |\n| shea<br>2:17          | 153:18                | 175:7,8,13,25          | 29:6 57:24 58:3       |\n| sheet<br>69:20 131:14 | sitting<br>19:25      | spatulas<br>101:22     | 179:6,9,12 180:6,7    |\n| 133:15 138:16         | situation<br>104:20   | speak<br>14:18 15:14   | 180:10,15,20          |\n| 158:12                | 121:23                | 23:25 24:9,17          | 181:17,20 182:20      |\n| sheets<br>109:4       | six<br>162:10         | 25:5,10 26:2           | 183:5,8 184:6         |\n| sherry<br>114:17,25   | size<br>42:2          | 44:17 144:25           | spring's<br>28:8      |\n| 146:21,25 150:5       | slipping<br>87:4      | 174:20,21 181:24       | 182:10,15,19          |\n| 150:16,17 151:16      | small<br>45:12 88:5   | speaking<br>35:20      | springs<br>26:19      |\n| 153:20 154:11         | 134:17 173:17         | 115:7,14 151:10        | 28:10,14              |\n| sherry's<br>146:25    | social<br>120:23,24   | specific<br>14:7 51:11 | square<br>1:18 2:4,9  |\n| shit<br>176:11        | sofa<br>55:25 56:14   | 94:17 100:12,14        | 3:25                  |\n| short<br>104:20       | 57:12,17,24 58:16     | 100:19 101:2           | ss<br>188:4           |\n| 139:22                | 58:22 59:22 60:2      | 104:4 110:24           | stab<br>43:22         |\n| shorthand<br>1:20     | 94:7 98:23 109:16     | 111:19 112:12,20       | staff<br>20:4 24:12   |\n| show<br>146:9         | sofa's<br>14:5 44:21  | 157:25                 | 51:17 52:8,9,24       |\n| showed<br>141:24      | 45:25 51:10 60:19     | specifically<br>20:25  | 53:14,17,20 54:4,7    |\n| 159:22                | 60:19,23 69:4         | 43:15 51:7 72:20       | 66:20                 |\n| showing<br>101:19     | 83:22 112:2 113:5     | specifics<br>83:10,16  | stamp<br>129:2        |\n| shown<br>132:21       | 168:8 170:5           | specified<br>186:11    | stamped<br>35:9       |\n| 147:7                 | software<br>60:16,18  | speculate<br>127:4     | standard<br>70:8      |\n| shows<br>117:20       | 61:2,5                | speculation<br>93:6    | 121:21                |\n| 158:5,21,23           | sole<br>52:14         | spell<br>23:12,13      | start<br>6:17 7:22    |\n| siblings<br>42:4      | solely<br>104:9       | spend<br>15:5 78:4     | 79:25                 |\n| signatory<br>38:23    | somebody<br>183:7     | 165:25                 | started<br>17:11 23:4 |\n| 66:18                 |                       |                        | 45:6 153:4,7          |\n|                       |                       |                        |                       |\n\n**[started - team]**\n\n| 162:18 182:21         | stricken<br>29:14    | supported<br>36:21    | 77:6 82:20 111:23      |\n|-----------------------|----------------------|-----------------------|------------------------|\n| starting<br>33:14     | strike<br>25:4 30:6  | supporting<br>51:17   | 134:17 139:18          |\n| 83:25 97:9 109:5      | 116:20 157:13        | supports<br>60:18     | 165:3 173:2            |\n| 130:14                | structured<br>65:23  | supposed<br>74:20     | 179:25 184:25          |\n| starts<br>96:17       | 66:7                 | 162:17 167:12         | taken<br>79:4 90:23    |\n| 109:21                | stub<br>72:9         | sure<br>7:4,11,23     | 139:23                 |\n| state<br>1:20 4:12,15 | stuff<br>30:25 168:7 | 27:16 31:24 32:2      | takes<br>47:15         |\n| 5:23 6:3 27:2         | subject<br>8:7 12:11 | 32:7 37:4 38:12       | talk<br>7:20 8:18 17:2 |\n| 42:22 73:17 76:16     | 14:2 29:14 53:10     | 38:13 43:13,21        | 80:7 146:3             |\n| 76:16 79:14 101:3     | 147:23               | 44:19 73:4 75:10      | talked<br>16:3 21:18   |\n| 156:5 188:3,7         | subscribed<br>186:18 | 81:8 88:13 99:22      | 30:10,15 46:2,9,13     |\n| stated<br>26:17       | substantively        | 104:6 110:13,14       | 55:14 59:9 127:9       |\n| 164:10 171:19         | 149:5                | 110:16 113:3,8,11     | 128:12,16 129:20       |\n| statement<br>14:5     | subtract<br>133:6    | 124:8 125:25          | 134:10 137:24          |\n| 34:12 37:21 54:6      | success<br>82:5      | 127:14 129:6          | 154:25 158:16          |\n| 55:19 73:6 111:17     | successful<br>86:10  | 135:25 136:10         | 164:3                  |\n| 112:4 158:8           | suffering<br>9:24    | 137:16 141:5          | talking<br>29:25       |\n| statements<br>8:25    | sufficient<br>42:12  | 150:25 158:4,11       | 64:15 79:23 85:2       |\n| 69:19 111:14          | suggested<br>143:6   | 165:6 167:13          | 96:12 98:25 103:8      |\n| states<br>1:2 3:19    | suggesting<br>142:12 | 173:25 174:23         | 104:4 138:19           |\n| 42:6 54:23 62:5       | 142:17               | 176:7 179:11          | 146:13 160:16,16       |\n| 69:11,19 71:20        | suggestion<br>145:24 | surprise<br>83:24     | 160:17 162:18          |\n| 72:2,22 157:7         | suggestions<br>141:3 | surrounding           | task<br>89:4           |\n| 162:8 171:11          | 141:8                | 182:12                | tasks<br>88:22 170:2   |\n| 176:19                | suite<br>2:18 6:8    | suspect<br>170:25     | 170:7                  |\n| statistical<br>94:3   | sum<br>72:11 96:17   | swear<br>5:10,19      | tax<br>19:21,22 52:25  |\n| statute<br>75:16      | 135:17               | swearing<br>8:4       | 53:3,4 54:8,9          |\n| 82:22                 | summarized           | sworn<br>5:22 186:5   | 73:17 74:3,8 75:6      |\n| statutes<br>75:16     | 155:24               | 186:18 188:10         | 75:7,24 76:14          |\n| statutorily<br>72:24  | summary<br>94:2      | system<br>60:10       | 77:2,16,22,24 78:3     |\n| stay<br>18:2 123:9,13 | 129:21 130:9         | t                     | 78:17 79:9,11          |\n| stays<br>123:8        | 153:3                | t<br>5:21 6:5 186:2   | 80:8,10 168:9          |\n| step<br>13:19 46:2    | sun<br>59:14         | 187:2 188:2,2         | 169:9 173:3,5,6,11     |\n| 69:25                 | supplement           | tab<br>10:12 32:11    | 173:18                 |\n| stepping<br>49:13     | 132:24               | 34:22 131:2 146:7     | taxation<br>19:9 22:2  |\n| steven<br>23:9,15,24  | support<br>19:6 22:4 | table<br>49:9,10 50:4 | taxes<br>42:7,7 53:5   |\n| 24:4                  | 22:8 40:6 49:2       | taconic<br>113:20     | 73:24 74:17 77:20      |\n| street<br>2:13,18 6:8 | 51:24,24 55:21       | tail<br>45:4          | 107:6                  |\n| stretto<br>89:22 90:8 | 85:19 112:6          | take<br>3:13 9:10     | taxing<br>75:11        |\n| 90:14 92:5,10,14      | 162:21 172:8         | 14:25 31:25 33:3      | team<br>55:7 56:20     |\n| 92:24                 |                      | 35:15 53:8 67:5       | 59:10 106:6,6          |\n|                       |                      |                       |                        |\n\n[team - top]\n\n| 109:24 110:16        | thing 19:17 64:19  | 172:11 173:16,17   | 44:24 45:19 52:20     |\n|----------------------|--------------------|--------------------|-----------------------|\n| 138:19,20 153:13     | 66:3 79:13 117:23  | 177:12 178:16,16   | 60:6 65:25 81:11      |\n| 172:9,12             | 120:10 122:14      | 178:17 179:3       | 86:17,20 90:20,24     |\n| technical 56:9       | 124:21 135:12      | 181:19 182:22      | 97:3 104:21 106:8     |\n| technically<br>74:22 | 157:2 162:15       | 183:21 184:20      | 116:13 117:18         |\n| technology 169:6     | things 6:21 22:5   | thinking 40:8      | 118:23 123:24         |\n| teleconference       | 51:21 54:18 69:14  | 117:7 123:12       | 136:13 137:11         |\n| 2:19                 | 100:24 124:4       | 149:9              | 138:2 139:20          |\n| telephone 45:15      | 156:22 161:2       | third 63:18 64:15  | 140:3 146:23          |\n| tell<br>124:19,24    | 167:19 179:2       | 117:6 119:24       | 154:5 155:20          |\n| 127:3 135:8          | think 9:14 14:11   | 122:6 130:24       | 156:14,22 157:11      |\n| 154:14 184:15        | 14:12 16:17 18:15  | 133:12 184:10      | 157:25 159:25         |\n| telling 118:21       | 19:8 20:20 21:9    | 184:2<br>thirds    | 160:14,15,21          |\n| 7:17 15:11<br>ten    | 24:13 28:25 30:16  | thought 37:12      | 162:6 165:7,11        |\n| 85:3,3,4<br>tense    | 30:20 31:2,5 34:6  | 38:18 46:25 56:21  | 174:2,10 178:25       |\n| 87:4 125:13<br>term  | 34:11 36:13,19,22  | 95:14 114:2        | 179:12 186:10         |\n| testified 5:24 6:15  | 37:5,10 39:7,13,21 | 126:15 127:15      | 80:10 145:9<br>timely |\n| 88:9                 | 40:9 43:9 45:10    | 138:20 142:7       | times<br>1:18 2:4,9   |\n| testify 10:2,9 12:2  | 45:24 47:19 49:13  | 153:9,13 161:21    | 3:25 6:18 7:15        |\n| 12:14,21 40:15       | 51:3 52:12 55:4    | 174:6 175:12       | 14:24 60:14           |\n| 41:2 186:5           | 56:10 60:8,17,20   | thoughts<br>151:3  | 104:23 177:11         |\n| testifying 7:25      | 70:6 73:22 76:20   | thousand 126:6     | timing 78:24 79:5     |\n|                      |                    |                    |                       |\n| 11:5 28:16           | 79:18 81:10,22     | 132:21,22 140:17   | 134:25                |\n| testimony 10:6       | 85:19 87:8 90:5    | 146:19 152:7       | timothy   2:19 5:15   |\n| 22:19 185:6 186:6    | 91:18 94:5 95:13   | 154:12 159:16,16   | title 21:15 86:12     |\n| 186:10 188:12        | 103:9 106:20,24    | 159:18 166:2       | 101:8 114:25          |\n| th<br>70:24          | 106:25 109:16,18   | 177:2 183:24,25    | today   7:25 8:13     |\n| thank 7:13 12:9      | 110:2,10,23 113:3  | threatened 143:16  | 9:13 10:10 11:5       |\n| 14:14 19:20 29:23    | 115:23 118:12      | three 19:272:7     | 15:4 159:5            |\n| 35:2 38:7,25 41:5    | 119:17 123:9       | 75:16 109:23       | today's<br>13:21      |\n| 41:13 45:24 56:25    | 124:21 125:17      | 112:16 161:25      | 185:6                 |\n| 90:19 94:24 96:14    | 126:11,13,15       | 163:10             | told 63:6 102:10      |\n| 99:25 102:21         | 128:3,5 137:24     | 137:17<br>tie      | 104:17 143:17         |\n| 103:2,3 113:13       | 139:3 140:6,15     | till<br>17:9 153:4 | 147:3 153:19          |\n| 119:2,4 128:19       | 141:19,25 144:7    | 15:18 28:13<br>tim | 181:2 182:14          |\n| 133:4 144:12         | 146:6,18,25 151:2  | 41:13 49:19        | 184:21                |\n| 159:6 161:8          | 152:4 153:8,14     | time 1:11,174:16   | tonight 85:13         |\n| thanks<br>41:16      | 154:18,24 155:5    | 11:14,18 15:9      | top   14:13 18:2      |\n| 144:18<br>theme      | 159:7,10 161:12    | 16:18,19 17:13     | 33:4 41:18 48:23      |\n| 55:21<br>thereto     | 163:2 167:7        | 19:8 21:12,23      | 97:5,8 130:10         |\n| 112:6                | 168:20 170:6,18    | 24:22 40:18 43:16  | 151:13 155:4          |\n\n**[topic - use]**\n\n| topic<br>12:2         | 70:11 72:6,12,22      | 134:6 141:13,23       | 47:7 63:22 65:21     |\n|-----------------------|-----------------------|-----------------------|----------------------|\n| topics<br>11:22 12:15 | 73:13 162:8,12        | 155:14 159:25         | 76:21 90:13 92:9     |\n| 12:22                 | 176:18                | 161:19,19 179:18      | 92:13 107:18         |\n| total<br>94:22 95:12  | truth<br>186:5        | 181:19 183:25         | 108:19 113:21        |\n| 96:5 132:10 133:5     | truthful<br>8:5 10:6  | 184:2                 | 115:20 119:9         |\n| 133:6,23,24 136:9     | truthfully<br>10:2,9  | type<br>17:15,20      | 121:3 141:15         |\n| totally<br>29:9,15    | try<br>8:20 15:22     | 68:14 122:14          | 147:4 149:10,11      |\n| 42:18                 | 61:25 149:8 161:5     | 148:8,17              | 149:13,19 180:25     |\n| tower<br>3:25         | 171:5                 | types<br>22:5 51:22   | 182:17 183:2         |\n| track<br>124:17       | trying<br>14:11 21:9  | 53:15 77:15,18        | understood<br>9:3    |\n| trade<br>120:14       | 45:9 48:14 132:15     | typically<br>43:20    | 88:6 89:17 100:16    |\n| trademarks<br>120:4   | 135:23,25 136:5       | 69:13 86:15 131:9     | 133:4 145:8          |\n| 120:14                | 162:14 163:10         | 154:9 166:5           | undisclosed<br>139:9 |\n| transaction<br>126:9  | 170:14 174:2          | u                     | 139:11,12            |\n| transactional         | turbotax<br>60:23     | u.s.<br>72:6,12 73:13 | unheard<br>176:24    |\n| 80:12                 | turn<br>3:9 11:8,21   | 161:10 162:12         | unit<br>3:16         |\n| transactions<br>80:9  | 33:2 68:5 96:24       | uh<br>8:25            | united<br>1:2 3:19   |\n| 82:9,25 84:13         | 105:18 137:23         | ultimately<br>150:22  | 54:23 62:5 69:11     |\n| 171:17                | turning<br>20:24 23:5 | un<br>42:7,8,9        | 69:19 71:20 72:2     |\n| transcript<br>8:14    | 29:24 34:3 35:23      | unclear<br>47:2       | 72:22 157:7 162:8    |\n| 186:9,9               | 37:18 41:5 43:6       | uncover<br>40:22      | universe<br>154:6    |\n| transfer<br>82:10     | 48:22 49:9 50:4       | uncovered<br>40:23    | unkept<br>42:9       |\n| 152:22 171:18         | 55:12 61:7 73:15      | underperforming       | unknown<br>130:10    |\n| transfers<br>82:20    | 80:16 82:7 85:17      | 19:5                  | 140:24 157:17        |\n| translated<br>57:8,14 | 86:5 88:19,19         | understand<br>7:24    | unpaid<br>156:13     |\n| 57:16,19              | 91:4 92:18 95:11      | 8:3,15,21 9:2,4,7     | unregistered         |\n| travel<br>123:2,21    | 103:7 106:11          | 9:15,20,22 11:25      | 120:6,17             |\n| 143:3                 | 109:3 113:13          | 12:13,18 25:19        | unrelated<br>14:22   |\n| travels<br>115:24     | 115:12 120:3          | 27:11 34:11,13,16     | unsecured<br>167:23  |\n| treated<br>77:21      | 124:25 126:5          | 34:17 40:16 58:7      | updated<br>137:17    |\n| tried<br>59:13 134:25 | 130:8 132:6           | 81:17 86:21           | upkeep<br>107:9      |\n| 136:11                | 140:11 148:3          | 112:19 115:7          | uploaded<br>109:17   |\n| trucks<br>97:14       | 149:14 151:13         | 129:14 147:18         | 109:20               |\n| true<br>157:2 172:15  | 159:7                 | 148:11 150:5          | ups<br>164:18        |\n| 186:9 188:11          | turns<br>144:24       | 153:5 158:11          | use<br>53:11 64:24   |\n| trustee<br>54:23      | twitter<br>120:20     | 166:14 169:2          | 113:18,22 115:15     |\n| 69:11 71:20 72:2      | two<br>14:24 15:11    | 170:17 175:10         | 116:6,10 117:3,7     |\n| 157:7 163:17          | 15:12 50:16 62:20     | 177:20                | 117:22,24 119:7      |\n| 176:21,22             | 77:15 82:23 87:18     | understanding         | 122:19 139:17        |\n| trustees<br>20:16     | 90:7 92:8 129:5       | 11:4 27:18 28:11      | 158:24 162:4         |\n| 62:6 68:24 69:19      | 132:18 133:10         | 32:23 37:15 38:8      | 169:5                |\n|                       |                       |                       |                      |\n\n[uses - witness]\n\n| 60:17 115:21<br>uses | 55:15 56:19,23                        | 165:7,11 184:25       | 104:19,21 117:25              |\n|----------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------|\n| usually 69:15,16     | 57:2 58:15,21                         | 185:4                 | 134:15 141:17                 |\n| 81:12 83:25 86:25    | 59:15,25 61:14,18                     | videos 120:8,19       | 156:23 162:2                  |\n| 87:11,18 117:17      | 64:11 65:9,13                         | 36:25 107:2<br>view   | 188:16                        |\n| 134:15 154:11        | 66:10 67:9,12,15                      | 148:18 149:6          | 77:22<br>ways                 |\n| utilities<br>144:12  | 67:24 71:12,18                        | 166:10,19,23          | we've 16:3 20:16              |\n| V                    | 72:17 73:18 76:10                     | 170:10                | 20:20 21:4,10,10              |\n| v&l 56:3             | 76:25 78:16 80:20                     | virtually 74:19       | 22:13 30:10,15                |\n|                      | 82:3 83:4 84:17                       | 169:8 176:18,20       | 44:20 45:10 55:14             |\n| 88:12<br>v&l's       | 84:22 85:25 87:19                     | 118:16 142:5<br>visit | 67:14 85:8 94:5               |\n| valuable<br>116:3    | 87:23 89:18 93:3                      | visits<br>118:9       | 128:12 129:20                 |\n| valuation<br>121:10  | 94:6,10 95:3                          | volunteered<br>184:8  | 132:3 134:10                  |\n| 121:13               | 96:20 97:10,15                        | W                     | 154:18,21 158:16              |\n| value<br>67:15       | 98:5 99:5 100:8                       |                       | 162:16 163:20                 |\n| 102:24 120:22        | 101:13 102:3                          | wait<br>8:19          | 164:3                         |\n| 121:7,19,22,25       | 106:2 107:23                          | walk<br>55:16 94:13   | 19:13<br>wealthy              |\n| 122:3,5              | 109:5,11 111:20                       | walked<br>110:16      | 162:8<br>website              |\n| vans 97:14           | 112:8,16,17,20                        | 98:4<br>walking       | wednesday 16:17               |\n| various 18:2 20:3    | 122:15 124:9                          | 141 · 7               | 45:17 116:2,16                |\n| 42:2.5.6 51:16       | 125:22 128:10                         | 1:5 2:9 3:18<br>wan   | 123:16,18 126:12              |\n| 54:22 57:9 58:24     | 134:21 135:15,19                      | 5:5 11:694:4          | 174:15 182:23                 |\n| 59:6 69:22 75:11     | 136:22 140:23                         | 111:18                | week 42:13                    |\n| 118:24 120:8,13      | 144:21 149:11                         | 16:25 40:21<br>want   | 66:24<br>weekly               |\n| 120:19 183:13        | 163:17                                | 40:22 44:17 45:18     | welcome 41:14                 |\n| vehicle 115:23,24    | verdolino's 130:14                    | 55:16 66:23 75:21     | went 17:5,8 31:5              |\n| 117:13,22,23         | 59:16 138:3<br>verify                 | 94:13 104:2           | 43:24 45:19                   |\n| vehicles 115:14,21   | veritext 4:3,5                        | 105:18 107:5,12       | 122:23,24,25                  |\n| 116:9,13 117:2,8     | vermont 176:17                        | 146:3 147:19          | 123:5 174:7                   |\n| 118:25               | 79:16<br>version                      | 149:8 168:18          | 17:4<br>western               |\n| verdolino   1:15 7:9 | 127:13 133:15                         | 172:3                 | whatsoever                    |\n| 10:25 12:14,22       | 137:17,24 140:12                      | wanted 45:21          | 123:22                        |\n| 13:24 15:16 17:12    |                                       | 105:10 110:14         | whereof 188:18                |\n| 18:22,25 19:25       | 140:20,22 150:10<br>versus 38:9 41:24 | 144:7 163:22          |                               |\n| 20:10,15 21:15,20    | 119:24                                | wants 69:20 172:2     | whispering 3:7<br>wife 138:25 |\n| 22:24 23:6,18,25     |                                       | 172:3                 |                               |\n| 24:17 25:7 26:3      | video 1:14 3:13,17                    | washington 6:8        | 141:13 142:8,24               |\n| 30:11,13 31:15       | videographer 2:22                     | water 34:24           | 145:14                        |\n| 36:7,18 37:3,23      | 3:2 4:4 5:9,18                        | watercraft 97:15      | willing 64:20                 |\n| 38:21 39:4,17        | 8:10 11:14,18                         | 119:5                 | 67:18,20<br>wip               |\n| 43:7 44:13 48:8      | 34:23 35:4 90:20                      | watermark<br>162:6    | wire<br>152:21                |\n| 48:20 49:4,14,18     | 90:24 139:20                          | way 47:21 54:19       | witness 5:11,20,22            |\n| 49:25 50:15,20       | 140:3 164:25                          | 62:10 67:3 75:14      | 26:21 27:8 28:15              |\n\n[witness - zero]\n\n| 29:10,11,16 35:3     | 91:3<br>wrapping     | Z                   |\n|----------------------|----------------------|---------------------|\n| 46:21 59:12 78:11    | 96:8<br>wraps        | 67:14 79:20<br>zero |\n| 83:8 85:10 116:12    | write 36:13 41:18    | 82:21 94:24         |\n| 130:2 131:4,12       | 177:10               | 106:13,16,24        |\n| 148:2 164:20         | 34:4 39:6<br>writes  | 107:19 108:20,23    |\n| 167:9 176:11         | writings 113:9       | 146:4,11            |\n| 185:9 188:9,12,18    | written 8:12 65:18   |                     |\n| word<br>રતેઃડો       | 119:8 121:2          |                     |\n| words<br>27:9        | 126:10               |                     |\n| work<br>17:8 19:9,11 | wrong 73:5 162:13    |                     |\n| 22:19 40:4 42:10     | 170:24               |                     |\n| 43:8 44:13 46:22     | wrote 37:5 181:25    |                     |\n| 54:5,8,9 56:12,13    | 182:4                |                     |\n| 57:17 58:20 59:24    | X                    |                     |\n| 61:14,18 64:11       |                      |                     |\n| 66:4,11 67:21        | 1:3,8 187:2,17<br>X  |                     |\n| 68:14 70:14 73:3     | y                    |                     |\n| 73:18 76:24 78:15    | yacht<br>119:7       |                     |\n| 80:19 83:14,15,17    | yeah<br>59:13 170:13 |                     |\n| 84:2 86:2 88:10      | 172:25               |                     |\n| 88:14,17 89:17       | year 42:13 74:11     |                     |\n| 90:2,3,13 97:10,16   | 74:12 75:15,16       |                     |\n| 97:20 98:6 109:10    | 82:23 154:10,13      |                     |\n| 112:14,20 121:11     | years 7:17 17:13     |                     |\n| 125:23 135:19        | 18:3 20:21 82:23     |                     |\n| 154:19,25 167:24     | 82:24 166:3,4        |                     |\n| 169:22 176:20        | 169:3 176:7          |                     |\n| 177:2 178:2,5        | 36:2 95:22<br>yep    |                     |\n| worked    15:20 45:2 | 121:9 178:8,10       |                     |\n| 56:16 92:5 95:5      | yesterday 106:22     |                     |\n| 100:17 109:22        | 123:16 126:12        |                     |\n| 135:22 136:4,9       | york 1:18,19,21      |                     |\n| working 51:18        | 2:5,5,10,10 3:25     |                     |\n| 90:6 96:22 136:15    | 4:2 5:23 58:8        |                     |\n| 155:25 178:4         | 79:15,17 115:8,10    |                     |\n| works 134:15         | 146:22 173:19        |                     |\n| 176:9                | 176:14 188:3,7       |                     |\n| world 38:2           | youtube 120:20       |                     |\n| worried 182:10       |                      |                     |\n| worth 19:10,25       |                      |                     |\n|                      |                      |                     |\n|                      |                      |                     |\n\nFederal Rules of Civil Procedure\n\nRule 30\n\n(e) Review By the Witness; Changes.\n\n(1) Review; Statement of Changes. On request by the deponent or a party before the deposition is completed, the deponent must be allowed 30 days after being notified by the officer that the transcript or recording is available in which: (A) to review the transcript or recording; and (B) if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement listing the changes and the reasons for making them.\n\n(2) Changes Indicated in the Officer's Certificate. The officer must note in the certificate prescribed by Rule 30(f)(1) whether a review was requested and, if so, must attach any changes the deponent makes during the 30-day period.\n\nDISCLAIMER: THE FOREGOING FEDERAL PROCEDURE RULES ARE PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. THE ABOVE RULES ARE CURRENT AS OF APRIL 1, 2019. PLEASE REFER TO THE APPLICABLE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION.\n\n85\n\nVERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS COMPANY CERTIFICATE AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions represents that the foregoing transcript is a true, correct and complete transcript of the colloquies, questions and answers as submitted by the court reporter. Veritext Legal Solutions further represents that the attached exhibits, if any, are true, correct and complete documents as submitted by the court reporter and/or attorneys in relation to this deposition and that the documents were processed in accordance with our litigation support and production standards.\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions is committed to maintaining the confidentiality of client and witness information, in accordance with the regulations promulgated under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), as amended with respect to protected health information and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, as amended, with respect to Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Physical transcripts and exhibits are managed under strict facility and personnel access controls. Electronic files of documents are stored in encrypted form and are transmitted in an encrypted fashion to authenticated parties who are permitted to access the material. Our data is hosted in a Tier 4 SSAE 16 certified facility.\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions complies with all federal and State regulations with respect to the provision of court reporting services, and maintains its neutrality and independence regardless of relationship or the financial outcome of any litigation. Veritext requires adherence to the foregoing professional and ethical standards from all of its subcontractors in their independent contractor agreements.\n\nInquiries about Veritext Legal Solutions' confidentiality and security policies and practices should be directed to Veritext's Client Services Associates indicated on the cover of this document or at www.veritext.com.","body_zh":"证物 PAX 26\n\nCraig Jalbert（克雷格·贾尔伯特）证言记录\n\n美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院\n------------------------------------------X\n关于：\n第 11 章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n案号 22-50073(JAM)\n债务人。\n------------------------------------------X\n\n日期：April 8, 2022\n时间：10:17 A.M.\n\n在上述事项中，于上述日期和时间，在 O'Melveny & Myers LLP（奥迈尼律师事务所）位于 7 Times Square, New York, New York 10036 的办公室，由纽约州公证人兼速记记录员 Lenaya Lynch（莱纳娅·林奇）对 VERDOLINO & LOWEY, P.C.（Verdolino & Lowey 律师事务所）的 Craig Jalbert 进行录像记录的证言录取。\n\n第 1 页 85\n\n出庭人员：\nO'MELVENY & MYERS LLP（奥迈尼律师事务所）\nPACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND LLP（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限责任合伙企业）的代理律师\n7 Times Square, 30th Floor\nNew York, New York 10036\n代理律师：LAURA ARONSSON, ESQ.（劳拉·阿龙松律师）\nDAVID HARBACH, ESQ.（大卫·哈巴赫律师）\nMaKENZIE B. RUSSO, ESQ.（麦肯齐·B·鲁索律师）\n\nBROWN RUDNICK LLP（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）的代理律师\n7 Times Square\nNew York, New York 10036\n代理律师：KENNETH J. AULET, ESQ.（肯尼斯·J·奥莱特律师）\n\nPULLMAN & COMLEY LLC（普尔曼与康利律师事务所）\n债权人委员会的代理律师\n850 Main Street\nPO Box 7006\nBridgeport, Connecticut 06601\n代理律师：IRVE J. GOLDMAN, ESQ.（欧文·J·戈德曼律师）\n\nCOHN, BIRNBAUM, SHEA P.C.（科恩、伯恩鲍姆、谢伊律师事务所）\nGOLDEN SPRING（黄金之泉）的代理律师\n100 Pearl Street, Suite 12\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06103\n代理律师：TIMOTHY MILTENBERGER, ESQ.（蒂莫西·米尔滕伯格律师），通过电话会议\n\n同时出席：\nJON DIFILIPPO（乔恩·迪菲利波），法律录像员\n\n*\n*\n*\n\n第 2 页　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　第 4 页\n\nC. JALBERT　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 C. JALBERT\n\n录像员：早上好。我们现在开始记录，时间为 April 22nd 10:17 a.m.——抱歉，April 8th, 2022。请注意，麦克风较为灵敏，可能会收录低语、私人谈话和手机干扰。请关闭所有手机，或将其远离麦克风，因为手机可能干扰证言录取的音频。除非各方一致同意停止记录，否则音频和视频记录将持续进行。\n\n我是 Veritext（Veritext 公司）的录像员 Jonathan DiFilippo（乔纳森·迪菲利波）。法庭记录员为 Veritext 公司的 Lenaya Lynch（莱纳娅·林奇）。\n\n我无权主持宣誓。我与本诉讼的任何一方均无亲属关系，亦不对结果具有经济利益。\n\n现在，请各位律师、在场人员及远程出席的所有人员，为记录目的陈述各自的出庭身份及所属机构。如对本程序有任何异议，请在陈述出庭身份时提出，先由发出通知的律师开始。\n\nARONSSON 女士：劳拉·阿龙松，O'Melveny and Myers 律师事务所，代理 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund LP（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）。\n\nHARBACH 先生：大卫·哈巴赫，O'Melveny and Myers 律师事务所，代理同一委托人。\n\nRUSSO 女士：麦肯齐·鲁索，O'Melveny and Myers 律师事务所，代理同一委托人。\n\n录像员：这是在关于 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的事项中，对 Craig Jalbert（克雷格·贾尔伯特）进行录像记录的证言录取，媒体单元 1；该事项已向美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院提交，案号为 22-50073。\n\n本次证言录取在位于纽约州纽约市时代广场大厦的 O'Melveny and Myers LLP 举行。\n\nAULET 先生：肯尼斯·奥莱特，Brown Rudnick 律师事务所，债务人 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的拟任代理律师。\n\nGOLDMAN 先生：欧文·戈德曼，Pullman and Comley 律师事务所，债权人委员会的拟任代理律师。\n\n录像员：请法庭记录员为证人宣誓。\n\nAULET 先生：线上还有一人。\n\nMILTENBERGER 先生：现场人员都说完了吗？蒂莫西·米尔滕伯格，代理 Golden Spring, NY Limited（纽约黄金之泉有限公司）。\n\n录像员：请法庭记录员为证人宣誓。\n\nCRAIG JALBERT（克雷格·贾尔伯特）被传唤为证人，在纽约州公证人先行依法为其宣誓后，接受询问并作证如下：\n\n询问\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions（Veritext 法律解决方案公司） 866 299-5127\n\n2（第 2 页至第 5 页）\n\nC. JALBERT　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 C. JALBERT\n\nARONSSON 女士：\n\n问：请为记录陈述您的姓名。\n\n答：Craig Jalbert，J-A-L-B-E-R-T。\n\n问：您的地址是什么？\n\n答：家庭住址？营业地址是 124 Washington Street, Suite 101, Foxboro, Massachusetts 02035。\n\n问：早上好。我们此前在非记录状态下见过。现在进入记录，我叫 Laura Aronsson，是 O'Melveny and Myers 律师事务所代理 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund 的律师。Jalbert 先生，您以前曾在法庭上作证吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在哪个案件中——或者我先问，作证过多少次？\n\n答：50、60、70 多次。\n\nGOLDMAN 先生：在我们谈得太深入之前，我能否问一下——这份证言录取通知涉及哪一项争议事项？法庭目前有多项动议。这份证言录取通知并未说明其涉及哪一项事项。\n\nARONSSON 女士：当然。我们已经送达了一份 30(b)6 证言录取通知，我会将其标记为证物，以便我们都能明确一致；但它涉及聘用 Verdolino and Lowey 律师事务所一事。\n\nGOLDMAN 先生：好的。我只是不确定，因为通知中没有标明。\n\nARONSSON 女士：谢谢。\n\n问：抱歉。您说过 50 或 60 次？\n\n答：70、80 次，我不知道。我没有一直记录——我有一份十年清单，追溯到 40 或 50 年前，而我从事这一工作已有 30 年。因此，不清楚。\n\n问：好的，我们稍后可以讨论您所具有的一些广泛类别的经验，但先来说明几项我确信您已熟悉的程序。您是否理解，您今天是在宣誓后作证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您理解这意味着您是在宣誓保证，您所有的回答都是真实的吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：并且您将受到伪证罪处罚的约束？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：录像员正在用摄像机记录一切，法庭记录员正在准备今天我们在此讨论内容的书面记录，并将随后出具该记录的副本。您理解吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：与通常的交谈不同，重要的是我们不要相互重叠说话。请在我完成提问后再回答。我也会尽量对您这样做。您理解吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您的回答必须清楚可闻。点头不足以构成回答，“嗯哼”之类的表述也同样不足。您理解吗？\n\n答：明白。\n\n问：如果您不理解我的问题，请要求我重复。否则，我将假定您理解该问题。可以吗？\n\n答：可以。\n\n问：如果您需要休息，请告诉我，我们可以休息；但如有尚未回答的问题，请在我们休息前回答。您今天有律师代理吗？\n\n答：我想是有的。\n\n问：您认为谁在代理您？\n\n答：Ken Aulet。\n\n问：如果您的律师对某个问题提出异议，您仍应回答，除非您不理解该问题，或律师指示您不要回答。您理解吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否患有任何会损害您准确或如实作证能力的疾病？\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions（Veritext 法律解决方案公司） 866 299-5127\n\n3（第 6 页至第 9 页）\n\nC. JALBERT　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 C. JALBERT\n\n答：否。\n\n问：您是否正在服用任何可能妨碍您作出准确或如实证言的药物？\n\n答：否。\n\n问：是否有任何理由使您今天不能如实且准确地作证？\n\n答：否。\n\nARONSSON 女士：标签一。法庭记录员将标记一份将成为 Jalbert 证物 1 的文件。\n\n（随后，记录员于本日将《证言录取通知》标记为 Jalbert 证物 1，以供识别。）\n\n问：好的，Jalbert 先生。您认得这份文件吗？\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：它是什么？\n\n答：Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund LLP 根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》第 30(b)(6) 条向 Verdolino and Lowey PC 发出的《证言录取通知》。\n\n问：您是否理解，您今天是在与关于 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的事项有关的情况下作证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：请您翻到第 6 页——\n\n答：不好意思，我忘了拿眼镜。\n\nARONSSON 女士：我们能否停止记录一分钟？\n\n录像员：现在是 10:24 a.m.，我们停止记录。\n\n（随后，进行了非记录讨论。）\n\n录像员：现在是 10:24 a.m.，我们恢复记录。您可以继续。\n\n问：您能否翻到第 6 页，标题为“规则 30(b)(6) 证言录取主题”的部分？您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您是否理解，您已被指定就此处列出的每一项主题作证？\n\nAULET 先生：异议。\n\n答：是。\n\nAULET 先生：他已按照我们的答复和异议被指定作证。\n\nARONSSON 女士：谢谢。\n\n问：您熟悉这些主题领域吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否理解，您需要就 Verdolino and Lowey 对这些主题的知悉情况作证，而不仅是就您个人的知悉情况作证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否理解，您需要取得使您能够代表 Verdolino and Lowey 就每一项此类主题充分且如实作证所必需的全部知识和信息？\n\nAULET 先生：与先前相同的异议。\n\n答：我尽了我所能。\n\n问：您为准备本次证言录取做了什么（如有）？\n\n答：我与律师 Ben Silverberg（本·西尔弗伯格）交谈过，与律师 Ken Aulet 交谈过；我与我的同事 Matthew Flynn（马修·弗林）和 Mary Jo Schindler（玛丽·乔·辛德勒）交谈过。我审阅了大量文件，其中一些已向法庭提交，一些为内部准备。我审阅了电子邮件。尽可能涵盖了所有内容。\n\n问：您是否收集了您准备的文件，还是律师向您提供了这些文件？\n\n答：这些文件——您是在问我们发送给 O'Melveny 的文件吗？\n\n问：我是在问——退一步说，我是在问您为今天证言录取所作的准备。\n\n答：我只查看了我自己的文件和 Verdolino and Lowey 服务器上我自己的电子邮件。\n\n问：一般而言，这些电子邮件的主题是什么？\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions（Veritext 法律解决方案公司） 866 299-5127\n\n4（第 10 页至第 13 页）\n\nC. JALBERT　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　 C. JALBERT\n\n答：是查看——全部的——并非全部。我的许多电子邮件，SOFA——财务状况说明书——清单、全球说明、全球说明和具体说明、大多数聘用专业人士的诉状，特别是我们的诉状、DIP 融资动议、许多异议，但并非全部。我在想是否还有其他内容。除此之外，我一时想不起来还有什么——\n\n问：谢谢。这很有帮助。那么，您提到您与您的律师 Ben 和 Ken 谈过？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您何时与他们谈过？\n\n答：嗯，我们稍有延迟，所以我今天早上与 Ken 谈了几分钟。我昨晚与 Ben 简短谈过。再有，今天早上谈的内容与证言录取无关；此前在过去几天中，我大概与 Ken 谈过一两次，差不多如此。\n\n问：除我们已经谈到的人员外，还有其他人吗？\n\n答：关于——只是关于证言录取？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您没有与债务人交谈过？\n\n答：关于证言录取？\n\n问：关于证言录取。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您曾见过债务人吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您何时见到债务人的？\n\n答：在延续举行的 342——或者 341 会议上，我认为那是星期三，我第一次见到他。\n\n问：那是您唯一一次见到债务人吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：在 341 程序之外，您是否与债务人有过互动？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我只是想涵盖一点\n\n第14页　第16页\n\nC. JALBERT（贾尔贝特）　C. JALBERT\n\n问：这些互动均通过电话进行吗？\n\n答：截至今天，是。\n\n问：您为此次证言录取与律师准备时，大约花了多长时间？\n\n答：我只能冒昧猜测一下。我面前没有我的时间记录。\n\n问：比如两小时、十小时？\n\n答：我猜是在两至四小时的范围内。不超过这个时间。\n\n问：除您提到的Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺与洛伊）的人士和您的律师外，您是否就此次证言录取与其他任何人交谈过？\n\n答：我们的IT人员Tim McDonald（蒂姆·麦克唐纳）协助进行了搜索——对电子邮件和记录进行电子搜索，并与Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）的IT人员合作，将所有资料发送过去。除让他设法取得记录外，我们没有讨论案件事实、情况或其他任何事项。\n\n问：关于您的背景，请谈谈您高中毕业后的教育经历，可以吗？\n\n答：我于1979年从Western Connecticut High School（西康涅狄格高中）毕业。我就读于Boston College（波士顿学院），并于1983年获得理学学士学位和会计学学位。自June of '83起，我在Arthur Andersen（安达信）工作，至August 31 of '87止。On September 1 of 1987，我开始在现今Verdolino and Lowey的前身机构工作，此后35年我一直在那里。在此期间，我参加过许许多多各种类型的CPE课程。\n\n问：您所说的CPE是什么意思？\n\n答：继续专业教育。\n\n问：这是您所持有的任何种类认证所要求的程序吗？\n\n答：其中一部分是我取得注册破产重组顾问认证所必需的。其余只是为了维持我的专业能力，并随着岁月推移及时掌握各种问题。\n\n第15页\n\n5（第14至17页）\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n问：所以您提到的是注册破产指导师？\n\n答：注册破产重组顾问。CIRA。\n\n问：所以这是一项专业认证？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：除CIA外，您还持有其他专业认证吗？\n\n答：除CIRA外，没有。\n\n问：CIRA。我想您说过，您在Boston College取得了会计学学位？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您持有其他研究生学位或任何研究生学位吗？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您目前受雇于Verdolino and Lowey吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：一般而言，Verdolino and Lowey为客户提供哪些服务？\n\n答：大概有三或四个——我想是四个主要类别。第一类也是最大的类别是破产领域，即经营不佳的企业和个人。这包括诉讼支持及与此相关的一切事项。我们有大约13或14名全职人员从事税务工作，我们也从事我称之为高净值客户照管的工作。我们有——我不从事这类工作。我的合伙人和其他人从事该工作，但我们有非常富有的客户，他们不亲自支付自己的账单，并拥有多处住所。一切事项都交由我们处理。我们为若干人士充当家庭事务办公室，而我们最后一项工作是为联邦国会议员、参议员及总统选举进行联邦选举申报。\n\n问：谢谢。\n\n答：我说过我们有税务部门吗——是的，税务部门。这就是四类。\n\n问：您提到高净值客户照管。在Verdolino，谁负责此项工作？\n\n答：嗯，我的合伙人和各类员工。\n\n问：他的名字是什么？\n\n答：Keith Lowey（基思·洛伊）。\n\n问：该部门是否参与了我们面前的这项事项？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在破产背景下，Verdolino and Lowey是否总是由债务人聘请？\n\n答：不是。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey还在哪些其他情形下受聘？\n\n答：我们曾受托于受托人、确认后受托人，无论他们可能被称为何种名称；您提到了债务人、债权人委员会、债权人、有担保贷款人。我认为，多年来我们可能代表过破产程序中几乎每一种当事人和利益相关方。\n\n问：具体谈到您的经验，您在Chapter 11案件中有什么经验？\n\n答：我参与过500多宗Chapter 11案件。我们曾担任委员会财务顾问、委员会会计师、债务人财务顾问、债务人会计师、代表有担保贷款人的会计师、代表个别债权人的会计师。让我想想——我的意思是，还是那句话，我们已经——我们几乎代表过每一种利益群体，因此随着时间推移，我记得我曾代表过破产程序中每一种合理的利益群体。\n\n问：您在Verdolino and Lowey的职务是什么？\n\n答：负责人。\n\n问：我们谈到了四个类别。一般而言，您对Verdolino and Lowey所提供服务负有哪些职责？\n\n答：大体而言，除经营我自己的事务所以外，我所有时间都投入破产、资不抵债及类似事务，其中也会涉及一些税务。我不管理该部门或任何类似部门，但我当然会参与互动，也会从事诉讼支持及类似工作，也就是您会在破产背景下从事的那类事项。\n\n问：一般而言，诉讼支持是指什么？\n\n答：嗯，其范围可以相当广泛，但对我们而言，无论是商业诉讼还是破产诉讼，只要存在某些领域，而律师事务所——我们也曾由法官指定——任何正在寻求或有兴趣以其所需形式取得财务资料的人，无论该资料可能是什么，我们都会提供。这包括制作专家报告、提供专家证言，以及在律师处理会计、审计及类似领域时向其提供意见。\n\n问：您提到您是Verdolino and Lowey的负责人？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您还担任过哪些职务？\n\n答：自我开始工作以来，我一直是负责人。\n\n问：转到本案的聘任，谁就此次聘任联系了Verdolino and Lowey？\n\n答：嗯，是有人亲自联系了我，是Brown Rudnick的一名律师Steven Pohl（史蒂文·波尔）。\n\n问：抱歉，我没听清您说的内容。\n\nHARBACH先生（哈尔巴赫）：请拼写该姓名。\n\n问：请您拼写该姓名，可以吗？\n\n答：该姓名是Steven Pohl。姓氏P-O-H-L，来自Brown Rudnick。\n\n问：Pohl先生联系了Verdolino and Lowey的谁？\n\n答：我。\n\n问：您。您还记得那是什么时候吗？\n\n答：大约在March 1、2或3前后。\n\n问：Steven Pohl联系后，Verdolino and Lowey就此次聘任与谁交谈过？\n\n答：就聘任事项而言，我与Steven Pohl以及——我相信是Ben Silverberg（本·西尔弗伯格）有过一些交流。\n\n问：Brown Rudnick还有其他人吗？\n\n答：我不记得了。\n\n问：除Brown Rudnick外，您是否就拟议聘任与其他任何人交谈过？\n\n答：我可能向我自己的员工提过一些情况，以进行利益冲突核查；我想我让某人协助我准备一些——我不该说准备，它们已经准备好了。发送一些关于我本人及事务所的个别资料。\n\n问：就该聘任事项，Verdolino and Lowey是否与Brown Rudnick以外的任何人交谈过？\n\nAULET先生（奥莱）：异议。您可以回答。\n\n答：是在我们受聘时吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：没有。\n\n第22页　第24页\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n问：主要联络人是谁——主要联络人是谁——划掉这句。除Verdolino and Lowey内部人员外，您一般就此次聘任与谁交谈？\n\n答：主要是Brown Rudnick的律师。\n\n问：您还与其他任何人交谈吗？\n\n答：我曾与其他律师通电话，但我没有主动发起任何事项。\n\n问：您曾与哪些其他律师通电话？\n\n答：我所知道的其他债务人律师是Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）和Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）。\n\n问：您了解Aaron Mitchell是谁？\n\n答：Kwok先生（郭文贵）、债务人的律师。\n\n问：您提到了Melissa Francis？\n\n答：也是Kwok先生的律师。\n\n问：除Aaron Mitchell和Melissa Francis外，您是否就此次聘任与Verdolino and Lowey以外的其他任何人交谈？\n\n答：也包括Brown Rudnick以外的人吗？\n\n问：是，Brown Rudnick以外。\n\n答：没有人。\n\n问：那么——那么，除Aaron Mitchell、Melissa Francis和Brown Rudnick外，您是否就此次聘任通过电子邮件与其他任何人沟通过？\n\n答：我曾被抄送一封电子邮件，并向该群体以外的某人撰写过一封电子邮件。\n\n问：那个人是谁？\n\nAULET先生：异议。这是我们已说明依Golden Springs（黄金泉）要求不会披露其身份的人。\n\nARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：您是否指示证人不要回答？\n\nAULET先生：我指示他不要回答。\n\nARONSSON女士：您能否——\n\n第26页　第28页\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\nGOLDMAN先生（戈德曼）：您能重复一下问题吗？\n\n（随后，记录员宣读了所述问题。）\n\n证人：应该是电子邮件。我撰写过一封，但我被抄送在多封电子邮件中。\n\n问：我理解Aulet先生正指示您不要回答。\n\nARONSSON女士：Aulet先生，您是否介意提供更详细的异议理由？\n\nAULET先生：当然。根据我与Golden Spring（黄金泉）的谈话，我的理解是Golden Spring认为，披露该个人的姓名可能会使其遭受骚扰，并且根据我对涉案文件的审阅，该人的身份与本次证言录取中待决问题无关。\n\n问：那么，我要正式记录在案，我们对该主张提出争议。\n\nGOLDMAN先生：我们也是如此。您——您担心受到谁的骚扰？您担心受到谁的骚扰？\n\nAULET先生：所以，Golden Springs的律师在线上，该问题最好向Golden Springs提出，但我的理解是——请，他希望回答。\n\nMILTENBERGER先生（米尔滕贝格）：我是来自Golden Springs的Tim Miltenberger（蒂姆·米尔滕贝格）。我假定证人所作证的是一名Golden Spring雇员的身份；从记录中我并不清楚，但显然证言录取中的人员得出了该结论。基于已提交的对DIP融资动议的异议，我们认为披露Golden Spring普通雇员的姓名没有任何相关性，并且我们认为，我们雇员的隐私权优先于通过知悉Golden Spring普通雇员姓名可能获得的任何资料；我们反对披露该资料。\n\nGOLDMAN先生：这应由法官决定。指示证人不要回答是完全不适当的。证人可以回答，而您可以请求法官裁定该回答是否应被剔除、受保护或受保护令约束。指示证人不要回答完全不适当。\n\nARONSSON女士：我已记录我们与Aulet先生的争议，我还要记录我们与Miltenberger先生就此处异议理由的争议。\n\nMILTENBERGER先生：谢谢。\n\n问：回到我们刚才谈到的那些人，您提到——\n\n8（第26–29页）\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）\n\n2　梅利莎·弗朗西斯（Melissa Francis）。她是否向你表示　2　以确保我没有遗漏任何事项。\n\n3　她是郭先生的律师？　3　问：除了 Brown Rudnick（布朗·鲁德尼克律师事务所）的律师之外，\n\n4　答：否。　4　你是否将该\n\n5　问：你是如何得知有关　5　聘用函草稿传阅给其他任何人？\n\n6　梅利莎·弗朗西斯女士——郭先生——删除　6　答：我不记得有其他任何人\n\n7　该部分。你是如何得知弗朗西斯女士的　7　参与其中，但我相当确定他们随后确实将其传阅给了——至少给了\n\n8　客户是谁的？　8　梅利莎·弗朗西斯女士，以及可能还有阿伦·米切尔（Aaron Mitchell）\n\n9　答：从 Brown Rudnick 得知。　9　。\n\n10　问：我们已经谈到你就本次　10　\n\n11　聘用事宜与 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）方面沟通的人员。　11　阿伦松女士（MS. ARONSSON）：标签11。法庭书记员将向你出示\n\n12　你是否知道 Verdolino and Lowey 就本次聘用事宜还与　12　标记为 Jalbert\n\n13　除我们已经谈到的人员之外的其他任何人进行沟通？　13　证物2的文件。该文件——为供记录，\n\n14　　14　该文件的贝茨编号为\n\n15　答：我认为没有其他人，　15　Kwok 00001646。\n\n16　但我的一名同事有可能　16　（书记员随后将电子邮件链\n\n17　见过 Flynn（弗林）。可能有过　17　于本日标记为 Jalbert 证物2，\n\n18　电子邮件联系。你知道——因为我　18　用于识别。）\n\n19　认为你曾提出异议——存在大量　19　问：在谈及该证物之前，\n\n20　日常业务中的专业人士。　20　何为破产申请提交后的预付聘用费？\n\n21　我们需要获取有关　21　答：我的理解是，\n\n22　对他们负债情况的信息，以编制附表。　22　破产申请提交后支付给任何人的\n\n23　可能存在某些信息及　23　预付聘用费，意在作为预付聘用费。\n\n24　材料，因为我们需要——这有可能。　24　\n\n第30页　第32页\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）\n\n2　他与他们交谈过，但我认为实际上　2　问：请你翻到本文件第2页。\n\n3　他所做的是从阿伦·米切尔和梅利莎·弗朗西斯处获得了全部信息。　3　请用一点时间。在第2页\n\n4　　4　顶部，Silverberg（西尔弗伯格）先生表示，\n\n5　我不认为他超出了该范围，但　5　预计不会有破产申请提交后的预付聘用费。\n\n6　这有可能。　6　你看到了吗？\n\n7　问：你是否知道阿伦　7　答：看到了。\n\n8　·米切尔和梅利莎·弗朗西斯从何处获取　8　问：你是否记得自己对于收取破产申请提交后\n\n9　其信息？　9　的预付聘用费是否有偏好？\n\n10　答：不知道。　10　答：嗯，每一名专业人士都会\n\n11　问：你是否询问过他们从何处　11　更希望有预付聘用费，但坦率地说，在\n\n12　获取其信息？　12　当时的情况下，预期不会有。\n\n13　答：没有。　13　问：先说你的偏好，\n\n14　问：谁进行了谈判——Verdolino and Lowey 方面由谁　14　你为什么会希望有一笔\n\n15　就该聘用函进行了谈判？　15　破产申请提交后的预付聘用费？\n\n16　　16　答：作为费用支付的\n\n17　答：是我。我不知道　17　保障。\n\n18　我是否会称之为谈判，但　18　问：你是否知道你\n\n19　是我起草、编制该函，　19　是否曾就本案收取过破产申请提交后\n\n20　并将其发送给 Brown Rudnick。　20　的预付聘用费？\n\n21　问：还有其他任何人参与　21　答：我知道。\n\n22　起草该聘用函吗？　22　问：你收到了吗？\n\n23　答：嗯，从 QPC 的角度而言，　23　\n\n25　我确信我让我的一位同事玛丽·乔·辛德勒（Mary Jo Schindler）审阅过，以确保　24　\n\n25　答：没有。\n问：为什么没有？\n\n第31页　第33页\n\n9（第30–33页）\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）\n\n2　答：我没有要求。　2　答：是。\n\n3　问：回到该电子邮件，　3　问：你是否就本次\n\n4　Silverberg 先生写道：“一个大问题是由我们聘用你，还是由客户聘用你。　4　聘用事宜要求过破产申请提交后\n\n5　我认为你是由客户作为其　5　的预付聘用费？\n\n6　财务顾问聘用的。”你是否记得这　6　答：没有。\n\n7　在本次聘用事宜中曾是一个问题？　7　问：你是否知道 Verdolino and\n\n8　　8　Lowey 是否就本次聘用事宜要求过破产申请提交后\n\n9　　9　的预付聘用费？\n\n10　奥莱特先生（MR. AULET）：对提问形式提出异议。　10　答：我知道。\n\n11　答：我认为我不理解你的　11　问：答案是什么？\n\n12　问题。我能读懂该陈述并　12　答：没有。\n\n13　理解它，但我不知道你　13　问：你还写道：“但我认为，如果\n\n14　在问什么。　14　我们将持有该现金，我们将需要\n\n15　问：他说“一个大问题”，你　15　受债务人聘用。”那么，这是否唤起你对于\n\n16　是否理解那是一个重大问题？　16　是否曾就由谁\n\n17　答：我理解那可能是　17　聘用 Verdolino and Lowey 存在问题的记忆？\n\n18　他心中的一个问题。我不知道他　18　\n\n19　是否意图将其作为向我提出的问题，或作为向　19　答：我认为我心中没有问题。\n\n20　他本人提出的问题，然后他自己回答了它。　20　我只是作出了一项\n\n21　阿伦松女士：Makenzie（麦肯齐），你能　21　支持其先前评论的评论，\n\n22　把标签12递给我吗？　22　其中他说，我认为你是由客户\n\n23　摄像员：Jalbert 先生，　23　作为其财务顾问聘用的。\n\n24　你介意移动一下水　24　问：一般而言，你能否说明你\n\n25　瓶吗？它进入画面了。　25　就以下问题的看法：\n\n第34页\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）\n\n2　我很抱歉。谢谢。　2　Silverberg 先生提出的关于由谁\n\n3　证人：对此很抱歉。　3　聘用 Verdolino and Lowey 的问题？\n\n4　摄像员：感谢。　4　答：嗯，当他\n\n5　　5　写道“我认为你将由客户作为其\n\n6　阿伦松女士：法庭　6　财务顾问聘用”时，我相当确定，那是——我作出了\n\n7　书记员将把将被标记为 Jalbert 证物3的　7　一项无偿的评论，或者并非无偿的评论。我\n\n8　文件予以标记。该　8　基本上作出了一项表示同意的评论，\n\n9　文件的贝茨盖章编号为 Kwok　9　即我认为，如果我们将持有现金，我们\n\n10　00001649。　10　需要受债务人聘用。因此，\n\n11　（书记员随后将电子邮件链　11　我是在赞同他所作出的决定或想法。\n\n12　于本日标记为 Jalbert 证物3，　12　问：你刚才说明的理解\n\n13　用于识别。）　13　依据是什么？\n\n14　　14　奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n15　问：请看一下该　15　答：哪一部分？\n\n16　文件。　16　问：回到你的电子邮件，\n\n17　答：好的。　17　“如果我们将持有现金，我们将\n\n18　问：你正在回复　18　需要受债务人聘用。”该陈述的\n\n19　我们刚才谈及的 Silverberg 先生电子邮件，其中所说的大问题是　19　依据是什么？\n\n20　由我们聘用你，还是由客户聘用你。　20　\n\n21　　21　答：嗯，我的专业判断。\n\n22　答：好的。　22　如果我作为 Verdolino and\n\n23　问：看你的回复，你　23　Lowey 的负责人，将成为一项\n\n24　指出：“如有可能，我希望有一笔破产申请提交后的预付聘用费。”　24　债务人占有财产银行账户的签字人，\n\n25　你看到了吗？　25　\n\n第35页\n\n10（第34–37页）\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）\n\n2　那么该债务人占有财产当然应当是我的客户。　2　答：嗯，在许多事项中，\n\n3　因此，我实际上是在赞同　3　我们——该事务所受聘参与，并完成\n\n4　Silverberg 先生在该电子邮件链前一封电子邮件中作出的　4　该特定聘用事项所预定的任何工作。通常，\n\n5　判断。　5　这是诉讼支持。如果预定由我们\n\n6　　6　进行调查，律师会预先考虑：看，你们将进行一项\n\n7　问：谢谢。仅为我自己的　7　调查，我们认为这就是我们\n\n8　理解，受债务人聘用与受　8　将会发现的。之后我们将不得不\n\n9　Brown Rudnick 聘用之间有何区别？　9　取得一份专家报告，向某一\n\n10　　10　法院提交。之后我们可能需要你们\n\n11　答：嗯，如果我是受　11　经历证据开示程序，\n\n12　Brown Rudnick 聘用，我不确定我是否会经历——　12　包括记录、证言笔录等，\n\n13　我不确定我是否必须经历　13　然后我们可能需要你作证。在\n\n14　破产程序中的聘用程序。我要不要提出受聘用的动议？　14　那些特定案件中，据我理解，\n\n15　我不知道。我不知道该问题的　15　在一定时点之前，即直至我被指定为\n\n16　答案。这不是我在此之外　16　专家之前，存在特权；但在其他情况下，\n\n17　曾考虑过的事情。　17　我们是作为律师的\n\n18　所以——但如果我是对的，而且不会有机会代表债务人提出　18　财务顾问受聘。\n\n19　聘用 Verdolino and Lowey 的动议，　19　他们希望我们进行调查。他们希望我们查明\n\n20　我不知道我们随后如何能够　20　任何需要查明的事项、任何\n\n21　允许我成为债务人账户的签字人。　21　指控、任何争点，\n\n22　　22　但他们可能会聘请另一家事务所或\n\n23　　23　\n\n24　问：谢谢。这很有帮助。　24　\n\n25　　25　\n\n第38页　第40页\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）\n\n2　问：你在确定由谁　2　个人作为专家出庭作证，以保持\n\n3　聘用 Verdolino and Lowey 时，是否依赖 Brown Rudnick？　3　我们所掌握知识的特权性。我不知道这\n\n4　　4　与此是否相关。\n\n5　奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。　5　问：谢谢。回到\n\n6　答：嗯，Silverberg 先生在　6　证物2——\n\n7　其电子邮件中写道：“我认为你是由客户　7　米尔滕伯格先生（MR. MILTENBERGER）：抱歉\n\n8　作为其财务顾问聘用的”，并且在同一天的下一封电子邮件中，　8　打断一下。我被叫去处理\n\n9　当我在下午6:49看到时——所以已经过去五个小时——　9　另一项事务，因此我将\n\n10　　10　现在必须退出。记录可以\n\n11　我基本上赞同了他的判断。谁作出的决定，　11　注明我正在离开\n\n12　我不知道。这是措辞问题，但我认为从那时起，　12　本次证言录取。\n\n13　已经很清楚，　13　Harbach 先生（MR. HARBACH）：谢谢你，Tim（蒂姆）。\n\n14　我们将由债务人聘用，　14　你随时欢迎重新加入。\n\n15　而非由 Brown Rudnick 聘用。　15　米尔滕伯格先生：会的，\n\n16　　16　谢谢。\n\n17　问：Verdolino and Lowey 是否曾在　17　问：我关注你在顶部的电子邮件，\n\n18　破产程序中受一家律师事务所聘用？　18　其中你写道：“我的感觉是，\n\n20　　答：我们经常在程序中受　19　\n\n20　在个人案件中，FA”——\n财务顾问——“的职责与经营性企业\n21　律师聘用。我认为甚至　21　案件的职责显著不同”。\n\n22　在破产程序中也是如此，目的在于　22　你能向我说明\n\n23　特权。　23　个人案件与\n\n24　问：“目的在于特权”是什么意思？　24　经营性企业案件之间的区别吗？\n\n25　　25　答：所以，经营性企业案件\n\n第39页\n\n11（第38–41页）\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔伯特）\n\n其规模和形式各不相同。它们可能有关联实体、母公司、姐妹公司。可能有多个债务人。它们可能在不同国家、不同州设有雇员。根据业务情况，它们可能存在未申报的工资税、未申报的销售税、未申报且未保管的押金。它们可能在预算编制和维持企业运营方面需要更多工作。它是否有足够现金，13周预算和一年预算分别如何。对于现金担保物，情况是——你有一名有担保债权人，其通常——或许并非针对债务人，但也未必与其一致。因此——这完全是另一种情形。在本案中，有些个人可能经营房地产或类似业务，但他们很少经营一家跨国、跨州、有雇员并负有各种报告义务和合规要求的企业。\n\n问。是否可以公平地说，与经营性企业案件有关的财务顾问职责比个人案件更复杂？\n\n答。在大多数情况下，是的。\n\n问。暂且不看该证物，在本案中，是谁向Verdolino and Lowey PC（韦尔多利诺和洛伊专业公司）说明工作范围的？\n\n答。我认为没有人向我们作出指示。\n\n问。因为是你起草了聘用函？\n\n答。我确信曾与律师进行讨论。我不记得具体讨论内容，但这并不是我第一次起草聘用文件——至少是其中一部分聘用文件。显然，我不是律师。我不知道聘用文件中包含的全部内容，但就职责而言，通常我会对职责内容提出意见。我确信我们先拟定了初稿，在Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）审阅后，他们可能作出了一些修改。我不记得具体过程如何。\n\n问。受聘时，没有人告知你在本案中需要做什么吗？\n\n答。嗯，我们参与过许多次讨论。这不是我的第一宗破产案件，也不是我的第50宗破产案件，更不是我的第100宗破产案件。我对将会出现的问题有相当充分的了解，并进行了初步处理。我不记得之后是否作出了修改。\n\n问。总体而言，Verdolino and Lowey在本案中的工作范围是什么？\n\n答。在本案中？\n\n问。是的。\n\n答。嗯，聘用文件本身已说明一切。因此，如果你想逐行审阅，就把它放在我面前。\n\n问。当然。\n\n答。截至目前，我们首先专注于——据我记得，SOFA（财务状况说明书）和清单几乎是同时进行的。我的意思是，它们在同一天、同一时间到期。因此，那是第一步。紧接着，我相信我们处理了所有人的聘用文件，以便向法院提交；随后——大概在该项工作的收尾阶段，我相信我的同事Matt Flynn（马特·弗林）开始编制应于2月底提交的月度经营报告，大约是在3月20日、21日、22日左右。让我想想我们还做过什么——哦，为债务人参加341会议作准备提供协助，或者在较小程度上参与准备。我们通过电话参加了第一天的341会议。我和我的同事Matt Flynn参加了上周三举行的第二天341听证会，方式是——我该如何称呼——我们没有为该时间计费。我是以观察员身份前往的。我们知道不会参与，但我们希望在场了解发生了什么、与人见面，然后参加本次证言录取。\n\n问。谢谢。因此，我想我听到的是，SOFA和清单是第一步。你谈到了就本案起草所有人的聘用文件。\n\n第46页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问。你谈到了就本案起草所有人的聘用文件。\n\n答。嗯，是起草我们自己的聘用文件。每个人都在专注于自己的文件，而我需要他人协助，因为我不是律师，需要他人协助处理我的文件。\n\n问。然后你谈到了Matt Flynn就月度经营报告所负的职责。\n\n答。是的。\n\n问。最后，你谈到了为341听证会作准备，以及参加341听证会？\n\n答。是会议。\n\n问。你能否进一步说明一下你就那些341会议所负的职责？\n\nAULET先生：我只是提醒证人，不要披露任何工作成果或与律师的谈话。\n\n答。在341会议的第一天，我们只是认为应当参加，因为尚不清楚会出现什么情况，而且他们不知道是否会出现需要我们处理的事项。\n\n第47页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问。不谈你与律师的谈话，你是否了解在341听证会第一天可能会出现什么、从而需要你参与的事项？\n\n答。在我的职业生涯中，我参加过非常多的341会议。341会议上任何事情都可能发生，因为它向每一名债权人开放，天知道会发生什么。\n\n问。你是否预计在341会议期间需要参与或提问？\n\n答。我认为有人要求我们在线上待命。我并未以任何一种方式参与。\n\nARONSSON女士：法庭记录员将向你出示标记为Jalbert Exhibit 4（贾尔伯特证物4）的文件。\n\n（随后，债务人的申请书由记录员于本日标记为Jalbert Exhibit 4，以供识别。）\n\n第48页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\nARONSSON女士：为记录起见，这是一份题为《债务人申请获准聘用Verdolino and Lowey PC担任财务顾问》的文件。该文件在本案中以Docket 90提交。\n\n问。Jalbert先生，请随意查看该文件。\n\n答。你想让我看什么？\n\n问。你认得这份文件吗？\n\n答。认得。\n\n问。这是什么？\n\n答。债务人申请获准聘用Verdolino and Lowey PC担任财务顾问的申请书。\n\n问。请翻到该文件第18页，使用页面顶部的页码。这是什么文件？\n\n答。Craig R. Jalbert（克雷格·R·贾尔伯特）为支持债务人申请获准聘用Verdolino and Lowey PC担任财务顾问而提交的宣誓书。\n\n第49页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问。因此，你认得这是你提交的宣誓书——\n\n答。认得。\n\n问。请翻到第21页，表格——我关注页面底部的表格。\n\n答。是的。\n\n问。稍退一步说，我想你提到Verdolino方面参与的人员包括Matt Flynn——在本案中，是Matt Flynn、Mary Jo Schindler（玛丽·乔·辛德勒）和你本人。Verdolino and Lowey还有其他人参与本案吗？\n\n答。我提到过Tim MacDonald（蒂姆·麦克唐纳），我们的信息技术人员，他仅参与——与本次证言录取有关的事项，即检索我们的电子邮件、服务器记录及所有相关内容，并将其移交给Brown Rudnick，以便随后发送给你们。\n\n问。Verdolino and Lowey还有其他人吗？\n\n答。据我所知，没有。\n\n问。回到该表格，Matt Flynn也是负责人吗？\n\n答。不是。\n\n问。Matt Flynn的职务是什么？\n\n答。经理。\n\n问。Mindy Jo Schindler（明迪·乔·辛德勒）是负责人吗？\n\n答。不是。\n\n问。她的职务是什么？\n\n答。经理。\n\n问。因此，就Verdolino and Lowey的本次受聘而言，有一名负责人、两名经理，另有信息技术人员？\n\n答。我相信是的。\n\n问。你预计Verdolino and Lowey的其他雇员会参与本案吗？\n\n答。随着案件推进，假设我们参与本案，是的。\n\n问。总体而言，负责人在像本案这样的破产案件中负有哪些职责？\n\n第50页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答。我把负责人理解为合伙人、董事、执行董事，或诸如此类，即本所负责该案件的牵头人员。\n\n问。具体就本案而言，你预计负责人将做什么？\n\n答。我协助编制SOFA和清单、总体说明及总体说明中的具体部分。我协助编制月度经营报告。我参加了第一天听证会——抱歉，第一——不是第一天听证会，而是341会议的第一天。回应各位律师的询问，并就支持人员正在从事的任何工作提供支持。\n\n问。你预计经理在本案中将做什么？\n\n答。同样的——同样的事情。可能是不同的工作量、不同的类型。我更多是审阅。视具体情况而定，他们可能支持我，我也可能支持他们。这次受聘与任何其他受聘没有不同。你不知道日常会发生什么，每个人都会尽其所能、尽可能高效地应对持续存在的问题和出现的危机。\n\n问。工作人员呢？你预计任何潜在工作人员在本案中将发挥什么作用？\n\n答。这将取决于事态如何发展。我认为不会发生，但如果发生了，而且我们——我成为占有中的债务人银行账户的唯一签字人，我的事务所可能会——簿记员可能会保管付款和收款记录。他们会协助报告工作。当然，我可能会审阅。如果在某个时候我们有债权异议，我不知道那些异议的性质会是什么，也不知道其规模和复杂程度如何，但我们的一些工作人员可能会参与债权事项。债务人可能必须提交所得税申报表。我将建议他们为遗产提交所得税申报表。因此，我们将有税务人员参与编制所得税申报表，而我必须逐项查看——并准确预测将会发生什么，但我们非常高效，也非常熟练。我们知道我们的所有费用均须接受每一名利害关系方的审查。因此，我们——在每一事项中都尽可能安排级别较低的人员处理；除此之外，我无法预测会出现什么，但工作人员和簿记员会用于处理此类问题。\n\n问。是否可以公平地说，你对我关于工作人员的问题的回答也适用于簿记员，即簿记员的职责？\n\n答。不，簿记员和工作人员。\n\n问。因此，你刚才给出的回答适用于两者？\n\n答。你问的是他们可能会做什么。\n\n问。对。\n\n第51页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答。他们——簿记员\n\n2　他们不会做报告工作，但他们会保留收据和支出记录。工作人员可能会处理该——财务报表或将要出具的任何报告的格式。工作人员会处理债权异议。税务专业人士会处理纳税申报表。\n\n11　问：您是否已完成您的回答？\n\n13　答：是。\n\n14　问：您提到了收据和支出。您预计在本案中会有哪些种类的收据和支出？\n\n18　答：我想，如果事情按照债务人的计划进行，会有一项拟议的DIP融资安排，资金将进入破产财产，然后推定将用于支付各类专业人士费用、美国受托人费用，以及债务人根据法院命令或通常为支付到期第11章账单而被要求支付的任何其他支出。我想就是这些。\n\n5　问：最后一项是文书工作。您预计您团队中的文书人员将在本案中履行何种职责？\n\n9　答：我没有预设他们将在本案中做任何事情。\n\n12　问：回到文件中的聘用协议，即第13页。我们已经总体讨论了维尔多利诺和洛伊（Verdolino and Lowey）在本案中的受聘情况。我想逐项了解第一页上的这些要点。第一项写道：“协助编制财务状况说明书（SOFA）和附表及其所有支持文件，以及任何修订”。这些已经提交了，对吗？\n\n23　答：是。\n\n24　问：谁参与了SOFA和附表的编制？\n\n2　答：您是问我所在的律所吗？\n\n3　问：V&L（维尔多利诺和洛伊）中是谁？\n\n4　答：我本人、马修·弗林（Matthew Flynn）和玛丽·乔·申德勒（Mary Jo Schindler）。\n\n6　问：还有谁参与了这些申报文件的编制？\n\n8　答：可能曾就与Best Case（最佳案例）有关的问题向某人提出过技术性问题，但我想不起来还有其他任何人——任何曾参与这项工作的人。\n\n13　问：布朗·拉德尼克（Brown Rudnick）是否参与了SOFA和附表的工作？\n\n15　答：您问的是我的律所。当然，他们参与了，梅丽莎·弗朗西斯（Melissa Francis）也参与了，另外——那是梅丽莎·弗朗西斯。亚伦·米切尔（Aaron Mitchell）也参与了。因此，显然不只是维尔多利诺和洛伊。整个团队都参与了编制工作。我以为您问我——如果我误解了，我道歉——您问的是维尔多利诺和洛伊中谁参与了，那就是我本人、马特·弗林（Matt Flynn）和玛丽·乔·申德勒。\n\n25　问：谢谢。是的，我问的是维尔多利诺和洛伊，然后继续问下去。所以您提到了梅丽莎·弗朗西斯、亚伦·米切尔、布朗·拉德尼克。总体而言，还有其他人吗？\n\n6　答：虽然我从未与他们交谈过，但肯定有人员协助将各种专业人士的文件和文字翻译给债务人和债务人。\n\n11　问：您是否就这份SOFA和附表与债务人沟通过？\n\n13　答：没有。\n\n14　问：您提到了一些翻译文件。您是否曾就您在SOFA和附表方面的工作收到那些翻译文件？\n\n18　答：没有。我不读普通话。\n\n19　问：您是否见过任何翻译文件？\n\n21　答：我不记得见过。\n\n22　奥莱特先生（MR. AULET）：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n23　问：您是否知道金泉（Golden Spring）是否参与了SOFA和附表的编制？\n\n2　答：我不知道。\n\n3　问：您知道Golden Spring是什么吗？\n\n5　答：知道。\n\n6　问：它是什么？\n\n7　答：据我了解，它是债务人儿子在纽约市的一个家族办公室。至于它具体如何运作，我没有任何信息。\n\n11　问：债务人的儿子是谁？\n\n12　答：我不知道他的名字。债务人的儿子。\n\n14　问：您和维尔多利诺和洛伊的其他任何人均未就SOFA和附表与债务人会面或沟通，对吗？\n\n18　奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n19　答：正确。\n\n20　问：您能否描述维尔多利诺和洛伊在编制SOFA和附表时所做的工作？\n\n23　答：我们与布朗·拉德尼克的多位人员进行了数次长时间电话会议，我不会记得所有参加电话会议的人；我们也与梅丽莎·弗朗西斯和亚伦·米切尔进行了沟通。亚伦·米切尔和梅丽莎·弗朗西斯提供了大量各种信息。布朗·拉德尼克在我们之前就已经参与本案。他们已经掌握了大量信息，因此我们——我们与布朗·拉德尼克团队、梅丽莎和亚伦进行了电话沟通，随后又进行了大量电子邮件往来。\n\n12　证人：我同意。很热。\n\n13　哈巴赫先生（MR. HARBACH）：是的，我试图挡住阳光。\n\n15　问：维尔多利诺和洛伊是否进行了任何调查，以核实从布朗·拉德尼克、梅丽莎·弗朗西斯或亚伦·米切尔获得的信息？\n\n19　答：没有。\n\n20　问：那么，可以公平地说，您接受了他们就SOFA和附表中所载陈述所说的话，对吗？\n\n23　答：可以这样说。\n\n24　问：维尔多利诺和洛伊预计还将在SOFA和附表方面完成任何未完成的工作吗？\n\n2　答：我不知道是否有预期的工作，但如果在某个时间点，事实和情形需要审查并可能作出修订，我认为我们必须参与，因为我们是了解Best Case并拥有该系统的人；但目前没有预期的工作。只有在这种情况出现时，我们才会参与。\n\n13　问：您已经——您多次提到Best Case。您是什么意思？\n\n16　答：这是一种行业使用的软件。我认为它是支持编制SOFA和附表的最主要软件。我认为全行业大多数人都在使用它。\n\n22　问：那么，可以公平地说，它就像编制SOFA和附表的TurboTax吗？\n\n25　答：或者像QuickBooks，或者——您知道。\n\n2　问：那么，该软件本质上是输入垃圾，输出垃圾，对吗？\n\n4　奥莱特先生：异议。\n\n5　答：所有软件都是输入垃圾，输出垃圾。\n\n7　问：转到聘用协议中的第二个要点，其内容为：“协助编制和／或审查现金流及相关预算预测，包括就提交申请后的财务状况提供建议”。您看到了吗？\n\n12　答：看到了。\n\n14　问：维尔多利诺和洛伊就这一项目做了什么工作？\n\n17　答：没有。\n\n18　问：维尔多利诺和洛伊预计将就这一项目做什么工作？\n\n21　答：如果我们仍在本案中且有DIP，我预计会做这些工作。\n\n23　问：所以这包括预算预测。为谁作预算预测？\n\n25　答：我想，我们将尝试确定一项预算，例如，债权人委员会的律师及其财务顾问、债务人的律师及其财务顾问、美国受托人费用。原本有多家律所拟成为常规业务专业人士，以及本案中任何其他预期支出，只要该等支出以某种方式获得法院命令批准。\n\n12　问：这也包括审查现金流。什么现金流？\n\n14　答：DIP资金。\n\n15　问：债务人没有收入，对吗？\n\n17　答：据我所知，正确。\n\n18　问：您是否审阅过本案中提交的债务人声明？\n\n20　答：我当然审阅过其一两份草稿。我不知道我是否见过最终版本。我不记得了。\n\n23　问：目前是否有任何来源的现金流入？\n\n25　答：流入破产财产吗？\n\n2　问：是。\n\n3　答：据我所知，没有。\n\n4　问：您对债务人没有收入的了解，是基于别人告诉您的情况，对吗？\n\n7　答：是。\n\n8　问：您没有就其收入进行独立调查，对吗？\n\n10　答：正确。\n\n11　问：该项目还提到提交申请后的财务状况。这是什么意思？\n\n14　答：他于February 15th提交申请。自该日以后的一切财务事项、现金收入、现金支出和预算。\n\n18　问：第三个项目写道：“开立并维护DIP账户，在必要时执行支出，并就所有现金活动提供会计记录”。您是否理解本案中存在一笔DIP贷款？\n\n24　答：不。\n\n25　问：您预计本案中会有一笔DIP贷款吗？\n\n3　答：希望如此。\n\n4　问：您是否有DIP贷款方面的经验？\n\n6　答：有。\n\n7　问：您有多少经验？\n\n9　答：我不知道有多少百起涉及DIP贷款的案件。\n\n11　问：维尔多利诺和洛伊就这一项目做了什么工作？\n\n14　奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n15　答：我们说的是第三项，对吗，即开立并维护DIP账户？\n\n18　问：是。\n\n19　答：我所做的唯一一件事是，在布朗·拉德尼克询问我是否愿意时，我咨询了一家银行；该银行在司法部批准的金融机构名单上。我向该银行核实——我经常在破产程序内外使用该银行——以确认他们是否允许我担任DIP账户的签字人，他们答复说可以。这就是我就此所做工作的全部。\n\n6　问：您提到的是Citizens Bank吗？\n\n8　答：是。\n\n9　问：维尔多利诺和洛伊是否参与了对潜在DIP贷款的谈判？\n\n12　答：没有。\n\n13　问：维尔多利诺和洛伊是否被列入了有关潜在DIP贷款的任何沟通中？\n\n16　答：我不知道。\n\n17　问：您本人是否参与了有关DIP贷款的任何书面或口头沟通？\n\n20　答：我不记得有。\n\n21　问：您是否了解潜在DIP贷款将如何构建？\n\n24　答：嗯，我曾在某个时候粗略阅读过DIP贷款。我没有\n\n第66页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）：我并不明确记得整件事情的每一个——细节，但我大致知道 DIP 贷款如何运作。\n\n问：在本案中，您是否知道 DIP 贷款可能会如何构建？\n\n答：我只能凭记忆猜测。\n\n问：在 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊），谁会负责与该项目有关的工作？\n\nAULET 先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：假定存在一笔 DIP 贷款？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：正如我重复说明的，显然，我将是该账户的签署人。会有簿记员和工作人员负责准备支票、编制报告，并向所有相关方报告。我想——委员会通常会希望知道——他们一般希望每周或每两周了解一次收款和\n\n第67页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）：支出情况，主要债权人可能也会有同样的想法。因此，无论——无论情况如何，随着报告要求逐步形成，我们都会处理该等要求。我不知道这些要求会是什么。除最低要求外，即月度经营报告。\n\n问：截至目前，Verdolino and Lowey 的运行率是多少？\n\n答：什么是运行率？\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 就本案已开具了多少账单？\n\n答：到目前为止，我们开具的账单为零。\n\n问：Verdolino 预计其在本案中已经计入了多少价值？\n\n答：您是在询问截至目前的在制工作量吗？\n\n问：截至目前的在制工作量是什么？\n\n答：进行中工作的工时？\n\n问：是，请回答。\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 是否与任何人就以下事项达成任何协议：如果 DIP 贷款未能发生，由谁\n\n第68页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）：支付费用？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：让我们转到下一项目，“编制、审查和分析月度经营报告和/或季度报告”。您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您之前提到，本案最近提交了一份月度经营报告？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：这是否是预计将——与该项目有关而进行的工作类型？\n\n答：嗯，今后将不仅仅是月度经营报告，因为将会有——嗯，推定而言，如果有 DIP 且案件继续进行，将会有收款和支出；即使没有，月度经营报告以及 United States Trustee Program（美国受托人计划）办公室也要求——披露在整个案件期间累积产生的所有破产财产专业人士费用。\n\n第69页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）：因此，由于财务状况说明（SOFA）、财产清单和第341次会议等一切事项的仓促处理，该情况没有出现在二月份的报告中。今后，我们必须按月度和累计基础报告每个人的费用金额、现金流入和现金流出；月度经营报告的一部分会计算应付给 United States Trustee Program（美国受托人计划）的费用。此外，对于月度经营报告，通常还必须——附上保险凭证，如果有事项到期的话。如果没有，通常——通常我也会将其附上，以避免混淆以及有人查找它。然后还要附上完整的银行对账单副本。United States Trustee Program（美国受托人计划）办公室还要求资产负债表、损益表、现金流量表，以及应付账款、应收账款和所有各种——因此，第一份已经提交。今后的报告将包含更多信息。\n\n问：退一步说，您能否\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions（威瑞泰克斯法律解决方案）866 299-5127\n\n18（第66至69页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）\n\n问：一般说明一下，第11章个人案件中的月度经营报告是什么？\n\n答：我认为它与商业案件中的经营报告相同或非常接近。在我看来是如此。但它是标准的——在案件审理期间，United States Trustee Program（美国受托人计划）要求提交的经营报告，直至案件被驳回、转换或确认。\n\n问：因此，您所述与月度经营报告工作有关的程序，预设了 DIP 贷款的批准以及对该等资金的管理。对吗？\n\n答：嗯，无论是否如此，月度经营报告都将到期。委员会律师、我们、会计顾问、债务人、债务人委员会、其他人以及可能由破产财产支付的任何人的——费用累积，包括正常业务过程中的费用。即使没有 DIP，这些也必须在月度经营报告中报告。\n\n问：迄今为止，您编制过一份月度经营报告？\n\n答：在本案中？\n\n问：在本案中，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：另一份月度经营报告正在编制中吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否还编制了——划掉。Verdolino and Lowey 是否还编制了附表中所列的预计月度经营费用？\n\n答：您指的是什么？\n\n问：我们可以回头再谈这个问题。\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：您或 Verdolino and Lowey 是否在本案中编制过季度报告？\n\n答：United States Trustee（美国受托人）的季度报告？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：没有。我们不编制那个，是他们编制。\n\n问：什么是季度报告？\n\n第72页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）\n\n答：United States Trustee（美国受托人）根据月度经营报告开具账单；对于符合 U.S. Trustees（美国受托人）表格中以支出形式支付的费用定义的支出，他们将每个日历季度内的三个月合并计算。因此，对我们而言，将是 February 15th、February 28th 的不足期间，加上 March 1 to March 31 的月度经营报告。该 45 天的总额将列入 United States Trustee（美国受托人）办公室的账单中，并且，假定该账单正确，我认为必须在本月底前支付。\n\n问：因此，是否可以说 Verdolino and Lowey 受聘审查季度报告？\n\n答：我不知道这里是否有具体列明，但当然，月度经营报告是提交给 United States Trustee（美国受托人）办公室以生成账单的表格。因此，我们知道——而且费用是根据支出水平依法确定的。核对他们的工作非常容易。我们会这样做，并确保金额正确。该金额经常不正确，因为有时他们会在三月份的账单实际到账前开具账单。因此他们是在估算。他们通常会有误差——这不是他们的过错——在第一季度，因为这不是完整的一个季度。他们没有作出估算的依据，无论情况如何，但我们会——我们会确保支付给 U.S. Trustees（美国受托人）的费用在该等情形下是适当的。\n\n问：转到下一项目，“协助编制和/或审查破产财产的联邦及州所得税申报”。Verdolino and Lowey 就该项目做了什么工作？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：我想您之前提到，您将建议申报所得税。您为什么建议在本案中这样做？\n\n第71页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）\n\n答：我在每个案件中都建议这样做。因此，个人破产财产的纳税申报表——个人破产财产是一个与个人完全分离、独立且不同的实体；与公司案件不同，公司保留其税务身份。如果它们是 C-corporation（C类公司）、S Corp.（S类公司）、合伙企业，无论情况如何，您继续提交 C-corporation（C类公司）的纳税申报表，而且其纳税年度末日仍为申请破产前确定的年度末日。在破产财产中，破产财产与个人是分离且不同的。个人必须继续就任何不进入破产财产的个人收入申报其个人所得税。在第11章案件中，债务人几乎所有收入都应当进入破产财产。因此，实际上不应存在单独的一份，但在技术上可能存在。破产财产——破产财产申报表通常规定为 December 31，除非您另作选择。有理由另作选择，但最重要的是，为了获得——《破产法典》第505b条规定的救济，为了获得该等救济，您必须提交纳税申报表。因此，即使没有应缴税款，我也建议提交申报表，以保护案件中的所有——每一个人，确保不存在会使各税务机关自提交附有 505(b) 函件的申报表之日起获得 60 天时间以选择对其进行审计的问题。这是使案件能够推进至结案，而不受七年时效、三年时效等限制的方式。因此，我建议每个人都采用 505(b)。如果他们不在最初 60 天内选择审计，他们就失去该机会。如果他们选择审计，那么他们还有另外 120 天。我希望——我建议在每一个案件中，无论是个人、公司、合伙企业还是 LLC，均应提交纳税申报表，无论该等申报表是否必要，无论它们是否\n\n第73页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 杰尔伯特）\n\n依法要求附有 505(b) 函件。\n\n问：如果债务人选择提交申报表，您预计本案将提交多份申报表吗？\n\n答：嗯，我不知道债务人将怎么做，而且再次说明，这与破产财产无关，也与 Verdolino and Lowey 无关，但破产财产将必须提交——我将建议其提交一份联邦申报表。债务人是 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）居民，因此将提交一份 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）破产财产税申报表；如果由于某种原因存在来自另一州的收入，我们将向该收入来源州提交申报表。因此我不知道具体会是什么，但至少将涉及 Connecticut（康涅狄格州）和 IRS（美国国税局）。\n\n问：我想我们之前已经谈到，您理解债务人在本案中没有收入？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您预计 Verdolino and Lowey 将就债务人的个人纳税申报表进行什么工作？\n\nAULET 先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我必须猜测 February 15 和 December 31 之间将发生什么。我不知道是否会有任何收入。有\n\n诉讼正在进行。可能会有和解。我不知道是否会有收入，但如果有，就会有收入。我不知道来自什么来源，也不知道来自何处，但最低限度将会有支出；从税务角度看，在破产程序中有两类费用。有专业人士费用等管理费用，也有个人通常发生的其他类型费用。抵押贷款利息、不动产税，无论情况如何。它们在纳税申报表中受到不同处理，但提交申报表的原因之一是——就破产财产的税务目的而言，支付给专业人士的费用是\n\n20（第74—77页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n可扣除的，而且您可以像递延所得税资产一样将其累积起来。因此，在未来——在我们为本案支出费用之后——如果未来达成大额和解协议，您将能够以先前的行政性净经营亏损抵销未来收入——\n\n法庭书记员：先前的行政性——\n\n证人：N-O——净经营亏损，以抵销未来收入，这也是提交该申报表的另一个原因。\n\n问：是否可以公允地说，Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）预计就报税事宜可能开展的工作，取决于未来是否有现金流入债务人或破产财产？\n\nAULET 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：不是。您将会有——视本案的时间安排及其他情况而定——应计费用可能可以扣除。因此，现金——显然，如果有现金，就必须处理该现金；但视本案的进展和时间安排而定，部分应计费用完全可能可以扣除。\n\n问：您是否看过债务人最近的纳税申报表？\n\n答：我不确定我是否能称其为最近的纳税申报表，但我看过部分。我不知道是否看过全部。我不知道是否看过完整的联邦申报表和完整的州申报表，但我——我至少看过纽约州申报表，以及附在纽约州申报表中的联邦版本；该版本可能是，也可能不是2019年和2020年完整的联邦申报表，我想是这样。\n\n问：如果债务人的收入为零，您预计从什么中扣除？\n\nAULET 律师：异议。\n\n答：我们谈的是债务人个人，还是破产财产？\n\n问：我们先谈债务人。\n\n第78页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n答：我对破产财产之外债务人发生什么没有——这不是我的问题，也不是我的关切。他将不得不另聘一名会计师来处理此事。\n\n问：我们谈谈破产财产。\n\n答：如果破产财产有应税交易，如我所说，我建议破产财产及时提交纳税申报表，其中应包括《破产法》和《国内税收法典》所允许的任何交易活动，我不知道那会是什么。\n\n问：转到下一项，其内容为：“协助审查、核对、分析，并在必要时对债权证明提出异议。”Verdolino and Lowey就该项开展了什么工作？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：一般而言，什么是——什么是债权证明？\n\n答：它是一种表格。有一种破产表格，即债权证明。我不记得表格编号，但它使任何声称的债权人都有机会在第11章或第7章案件中申报债权。他们可以基于担保、优先权或行政性基础申报债权，我相信还有其他类型，只是我遗漏了。我认为不存在债权异议期限，但在某个时间点，在第11章案件中，通常会有债权异议期限。但是，如果债权人已被列在附表D、E或F中，且该数额恰好正确，那么据我了解，该债权人无须申报债权。如果他们有异议，因为欠付给他们的金额更多或更少——他们很少会在被欠付金额更少时提出异议——但如果欠付给他们的金额更多，他们可以提交债权证明，以确定他们认为破产财产应向其支付的金额。\n\n第80页\n\n21（第78—81页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：您是否审查过本案中任何待决诉讼请求？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey在分析待决诉讼请求的胜诉可能性方面有什么经验？\n\n答：完全没有。\n\n问：转到下一项，“协助审查债务人的账簿和记录，以查找可能可撤销的交易，例如优惠性转让和欺诈性转让请求”。您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您能否向我一般性解释一下这是什么意思？\n\n答：《破产法》允许一个追溯期间。对于优惠性转让，它允许对提交破产申请前90天内的交易提出优惠性转让请求；至于其定义，我会让律师来界定。对于内部人及其他欺诈性转让，追溯期间可能是零天，我听说——无论针对何种问题，适用法条规定什么期限，可能是一年、两年、四年，视情况而定；但其目的是查找交易，以确定其中是否有任何交易可被撤销并可为破产财产追回。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey就该项进行了何种分析？\n\nAULET 律师：我提醒证人，如有任何内容，请勿披露任何具体情况。\n\nARONSSON 女士：抱歉，您是什么意思？\n\nAULET 律师：如果他做过任何工作，该工作将受工作成果特权保护。不要披露具体内容。\n\n问：撇开 Brown Rudnick（布朗·鲁德尼克）就该项主张的工作成果保护，您能回答该问题吗？\n\n答：SOFA中有一个问题涉及破产前90天内作出的付款。我不知道这对任何人而言是否必然令人意外，但那通常是由某人进行优惠性转让分析的起点。我们当然参与了准备该项内容，因为是我们提交的。\n\n问：您知道本案披露了多少笔破产申请前付款吗？\n\n答：不知道。\n\n问：21笔听起来正确吗？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：因此，该项提到为可能可撤销的交易审查债务人的账簿和记录。您是否就该委任审查过任何债务人的账簿和记录？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey是否就该委任审查过任何账簿和记录？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否可以公允地说，Verdolino and Lowey就该项依赖其他方的协助？\n\nAULET 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n第82页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n答：您说的是过去时还是将来时？\n\n问：过去时。\n\n答：就我们从信息角度所做的一切工作而言，我们依赖其他个人。\n\nAULET 律师：我们已经进行了很久，所以如果您需要休息——\n\n证人：不，我们把——一次做完吧。我想在今晚之前离开这里。\n\nGOLDMAN 律师：我们将在12点休息。\n\nHARBACH 律师：是，法官阁下。\n\n问：好的，转到下一项，“协助提供任何必要的诉讼支持”。我认为我们此前已经讨论过这个。对于我们尚未讨论的与该项有关的潜在服务，您还有什么补充吗？\n\n答：据我记得，没有。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey截至目前是否就该项做过任何工作？\n\n第84页\n\n22（第82—85页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n答：在本案中，没有。\n\n问：下一项——转到下一项——是“协助制定和准备计划，包括可行性”。这是什么意思？\n\n答：嗯，为了成功完成第11章程序，您必须确认一项重组计划，或者在其准备和制定时不论其标题为何。在我所知范围内，它甚至可能是一项联合计划。在这些计划中，通常会有一些预算，因为有时对债权人的付款会分期支付。我们可能协助编制未来某一期间收入和支出的现金流量预测；而且我——我不是律师，但据我了解，为了确认第11章计划，您必须证明债权人根据第11章计划获得的回报优于他们在第7章案件中本可获得的回报，而这通常要求您——嗯，您将需要可行性，而且您还将需要——另一个术语是什么——我一时想不起来——我记不起了，但无论如何它没有列出来。\n\n问：该项写有“可行性”，我想您也提到了这一点。可行性是什么意思？\n\n答：预测通常是使法院和其他利害关系方能够确定未来现金流量，并据此自行判断债务人的计划在财务上是否可行的证据。当然，法官作出最终决定，但通常每个人都会发表自己的意见。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey截至目前就该项进行了何种分析？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：如果债务人破产财产唯一的收入或资产来源是已清算的诉讼请求，Verdolino and Lowey是否会在制定计划中发挥作用？\n\nAULET 律师：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：即使有，也会非常小。\n\n问：明白。您是否知道目前有任何计划草案正在传阅？\n\nAULET 律师：异议。他已经作证称自己没有就此开展任何工作。因此，我不明白这与聘用 V&L 有何相关性。\n\nARONSSON 女士：当然。不过，我对与该项有关的持续工作感到好奇。\n\nAULET 律师：如果他正在就此进行任何当前工作，他可以回答。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：转到——转到下一页的下一项，其内容为：“就可能出现以及可能由您或债务人指示的任何其他事项和任务提供一般咨询和协助。”是否可以公允地说，这有点像一项兜底条款？\n\n第86页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n答：是的。这是一项兜底条款，但有一个前提——这不是我第一次干这种事——如果因某种原因需要完成一项广泛且成本高昂的独立任务，我们会提交动议修改我们的聘用范围，明确该聘用所涵盖的内容；但就——您知道，例如，有时他们会收到 IRS 的通知，只需某人花15分钟作出回应。我知道会发生一些零碎小事，不属于其他任何项目；这是一项针对细枝末节的兜底条款。其目的并非成为重大项目的兜底条款，而这只是为了保护我。\n\n问：明白。Verdolino就该项进行了何种工作或分析，如有的话？\n\n答：据我所知，没有。\n\n问：您熟悉一家名为 Stretto（斯特雷托）的公司吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：他们做什么？\n\n答：我不知道他们做的一切。\n\n23（第 86–89 页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n他们确实如此，但他们从事索赔代理工作及其他与破产有关的工作。我不知道他们提供的服务清单有哪些。我自己曾在案件中聘用过他们。我想他们目前仍在为我处理一两个案件，但范围有限。\n\n问：您是否知道 Stretto（斯特雷托）参与了本案？\n\n答：我知道有一项聘用他们的动议，是的。\n\n问：一般而言，您对 Stretto 可能受聘从事的工作范围有何了解？\n\n答：我没有看过他们的聘用动议。不知道他们的——\n\nARONSSON 女士（阿伦松女士）：我们暂时不作记录。谢谢。\n\n录像员：现在时间为上午 11:53，现暂停记录。\n\n（随后，进行了短暂休庭。）\n\n录像员：现在时间为下午 12:22。现恢复记录。\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您之前提到过，您过去曾与 Stretto 合作过？\n\n答：嗯，他们在同一——某些相同的——嗯，有几个。我们目前共同参与一两个相同的案件。\n\n问：您是否了解 Stretto 能否开立并维护 DIP 账户？\n\n答：不了解。\n\n问：您是否了解 Stretto 能否监控与 DIP 账户有关的支出？\n\n答：不了解。\n\n问：转到账簿和记录项目，第七个要点，我要请您假设，在提交申请前 90 天内，有 21 家专业服务提供者收到了破产申请前付款。我还要请您假设，Stretto 可以就这些付款提供分析。为何有必要由 Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）履行这些职责？\n\n24（第 90–93 页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：就证物 4 相关问题作最后补充。回到关于开立和维护 DIP 账户的项目，您是否同意，银行或托管代理人可以开立和维护 DIP 账户？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：我不了解他们为何不能这么做，但我当然不是专家。\n\n问：那监控支出和执行支出呢？\n\n答：由银行来做吗？\n\n问：是的。\n\n答：我不认为银行会做这件事。\n\n问：或者托管代理人呢？\n\n答：托管代理人会承担更多义务，具体取决于托管协议怎么规定。我不——\n\n问：但可以聘用托管代理人来履行这些职责吗？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对提问方式提出异议。该问题要求推测。\n\n答：凡是有点脑子的人都能做这件事。不会由我来做。\n\nARONSSON 女士（阿伦松女士）：法庭书记员将向您出示标记为 Jalbert 证物 5 的文件。\n\n（随后，正式表格 106Sum 于本日由书记员标记为 Jalbert 证物 5，以供识别。）\n\nARONSSON 女士（阿伦松女士）：为记录起见，我说明一下，这是一份在本案中以 Docket Number 78 提交的文件。\n\n问：您认得这份文件吗，Jalbert 先生？\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：这是什么？\n\n答：第一页是正式表格 106Sum，即债务人 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）的资产和负债摘要及某些统计信息。\n\n问：我想我们之前讨论过，Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）曾参与编制 SOFA 和清单。对吗？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 曾参与编制这份文件吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：我只想从总体上过一遍。第一个项目是——项目 1 与财产有关。该项目包括什么？\n\n答：具体是指——A、B 还是 C，或者全部？\n\n问：抱歉，问得对。1A。\n\n答：嗯，上面写的是“附表 A/B 财产正式表格 106A/B”，问题或 1A，“复制附表 A/B 中第 55 行的不动产总额”。\n\n问：谢谢。上面显示为零吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：项目 58 指向第 36 行？\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：所以第 36 行，就在页面上方，这里的总金额是 3,850 dollars。您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：所以第 36 行汇总为一个数字。它是本次提交文件第 4 部分的汇总，对吗？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，您说这份提交文件时，是指附表 A/B 的第 4 部分吗？\n\n问：是的。谢谢您的澄清。\n\n答：我同意，第 36 行是从问题 16 开始的第 4 部分的总和。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）就这些项目进行了何种分析（如有）？\n\n答：无论我们做了什么，都是与律师一起做的。\n\n问：我要请您翻到该文件第 3 页。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey 就编制该项目进行了何种分析（如有）？\n\n答：我与律师一起工作。\n\n问：您是否就项目 1A 进行了任何独立调查？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：转到 1B，这里写的是“附表 A/B 中的个人财产总额”，我想这指向第 36 行？\n\n答：我原以为它是指第 62 行。\n\n问：确实如此，然后是第 62 行。抱歉——所以第 62 行又指向第 56 至 61 行。您看到了吗？那是在 PDF 的第 7 页。\n\n答：第 56 至 61 行，是您所指的吗？\n\n问：对。\n\n答：对。\n\n问：第 55 至 61 行中唯一填写的项目是项目 58？\n\n答：正确。\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：只是为了澄清，每次您提到第 3 页时，您指的是顶部的页码吗？\n\nARONSSON 女士（阿伦松女士）：是的。我指的是顶部的案卷页码。23 页中的第 3 页。\n\n问：从这里的第 1 部分开始，Verdolino and Lowey 是否就该项目进行了任何工作？\n\n答：如果我们做了，也是与律师一起做的。\n\n问：在第 2 部分中，项目 3 和 4 涉及汽车、厢式货车、卡车等，船舶、航空器；Verdolino and Lowey 是否就该部分进行了任何工作？\n\n答：全部都是与律师一起做的。\n\n问：因此可以说，当您说您与律师一起开展工作时，您并未进行任何独立调查？\n\n问：第 3 部分，项目 6 至项目 15 涉及个人及家居物品，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n答：是。\n\n25（第 94–97 页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：无需逐一查看这些项目，您是否——Verdolino and Lowey 是否就项目 6 至 14 进行了任何工作？\n\n答：没有——没有与律师一起做任何工作。\n\n问：为明确您的职责，律师向您提供信息，而您负责起草该表格，还是您依赖律师起草该表格？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：显然，我们是在协商后将信息录入表格。\n\n问：除将信息录入表格外，您还做了其他事情吗？\n\n答：我们与律师讨论了相关事项。\n\n问：我问的是，就提交该清单和 SOFA 而言，当您说您与律师沟通时，您指的是 Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）、Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）和 Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）？\n\n答：还有 Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）和 Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）。\n\n问：您或 Verdolino and Lowey 是否曾与 Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）、Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）和 Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）的律师以外的任何人沟通？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在将这些项目录入表格时，是否有任何一方为您提供事实或信息？\n\n答：我们获知了一些事实，其中许多来自律师，并进行了许多讨论。\n\n问：是否——撤回。您收到的信息是口头的吗？\n\n答：有些是口头的，有些我相信是律师通过电子邮件提供的。\n\nHARBACH 先生（哈巴赫先生）：我可以问几个问题吗？\n\nARONSSON 女士（阿伦松女士）：当然。\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：我没有异议。\n\nHARBACH 先生（哈巴赫先生）：谢谢。\n\nHARBACH 先生（哈巴赫先生）询问：\n\n问：为记录起见，我是 O'Melveny（奥麦文律师事务所）的 David Harbach（大卫·哈巴赫），也代理 Pax（帕克斯）。我只有几个问题。先生，我相信您之前提到过，您或 Verdolino and Lowey 曾参与协助编制已提交清单的附注？我理解得对吗？\n\n答：具体哪一部分附注——\n\n问：是的，先生。具体附注。\n\n答：不是一般性的——\n\n问：明白。\n\n答：是的，我曾就此与律师一起工作。\n\n问：具体附注载于案卷中的 Document Number 77，我没有多余副本给您，但希望您同意这并非必要。对于诸如电子产品、家居用品和家具等问题，我的同事刚才正在询问您，具体附注例如写道：“住所和公寓内存有大量符合个人及家居物品定义的物品”，接着写道：“除非本文另有说明，债务人对住所或公寓内的物品均不拥有合法所有权，且没有任何法院裁定债务人对任何该等物品享有其他权益。”我的问题是，Verdolino and Lowey 是否以任何方式参与评估这些家居物品中是否有任何物品属于债务人？\n\nAULET 先生（奥莱特先生）：我仅对就未向他出示的文件向他提问提出异议。如果他能够回答，您可以回答。\n\n答：为明确起见，您是在问我是否调查过锅铲、锅具和平底锅是否存在、是谁购买的、它们值多少钱，以及它们是否在房子里？\n\n第102页\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：我只是想问，关于判定住所或公寓内的家居物品属于郭先生，Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）是否发挥了任何作用，还是说这件事留给律师处理？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：我们没有进行调查。除非Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）、Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）和Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克）告知我，否则我对其所有权没有任何个人了解。因此，这不是我的决定，我也没有进行调查，但我当然参与了与此相关的讨论。\n\n问：在那些讨论中，如果其中一人，即Brown Rudnick的律师或Melissa——我忘了她的姓氏——\n\n答：Francis。\n\n问：Francis，谢谢。如果有人向你表示那些物品不属于郭先生，你就照单全收？\n\n答：正确。\n\n第103页\nC. JALBERT\n\nHARBACH先生：好的，谢谢。\n\n谢谢你，Laura。\n\nARONSSON女士继续询问：\n\n问：我是来自O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）的Laura Aronsson。回到我们刚才就附表所谈的内容。我想David已经谈到了这一点。那么，在起草该文件时，你们如何决定第7项中提及的iPhone、第11项中提及的衣物或第13项中提及的家庭犬等物品属于郭，而不是属于其他个人或实体？\n\n答：Melissa Francis或Aaron Mitchell告知了我，或者他们告知Brown Rudnick，再由Brown Rudnick告知我们。\n\n问：公平地说，你刚才描述的这一事件链适用于该附表中列明的所有物品吗？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：我不知道——如果你想这样做，我们最好逐项讨论。我不知道你指的是什么。你知道，你谈的是具体的项目吗？\n\n第104页\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：当然，可以。那么，就附表中被确定为属于郭先生的任何资产而言，你仅依赖于你先前所描述的事件链，即Brown Rudnick从Melissa Francis和Aaron Mitchell处获得信息？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：不，我不是这么说的。我说的是，我们直接听取Melissa Francis或Aaron Mitchell的意见，或者他们告知Brown Rudnick，而Brown Rudnick告诉我，他们给出的答案是什么。不存在单一的沟通方式。这是一个不断变化的情况。我们完成这些事项的时间很短，但并非一种方式或另一种方式。正如我所说，是其中任一种方式，而且很多时候，电子邮件中包含所有律师，或者是有很多方参加的电话会议，而我不——\n\n第105页\nC. JALBERT\n\n——记得所有各方，但对我们而言，信息来源首先是Aaron Mitchell和Melissa Francis，不分先后。现在，我不记得谁比另一方更了解哪些事项，也不记得他们是否将信息传给Brown Rudnick，再由Brown Rudnick传给我们。当然，是在他们进行了其希望进行的任何法律分析之后。\n\n问：在准备这些文件时，你是否向Brown Rudnick、Aaron Mitchell或Melissa Francis要求过任何未向你提供的信息？\n\n答：我不记得曾提出他们没有回答的问题，但我没有调查任何事情。\n\n问：我想转到本文件第16页。请看该页底部，第2部分写道：“估算你持续的每月支出”。你是否参与起草该部分？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你的角色是什么——或者——\n\n第106页\nC. JALBERT\n\n——不，撤回这个问题。Verdolino and Lowey在该部分中的角色是什么？\n\n答：我们与法律团队进行过讨论，该团队包括Brown Rudnick团队、Aaron Mitchell、Melissa Francis，可能不止一次，可能口头进行，可能通过电子邮件进行，这是一项讨论。\n\n问：翻到下一页，估算的每月经营支出为零。这样说公平吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：你是否预计债务人的每月经营支出在此后仍将保持为零？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：这当然与律师讨论过。我认为这不是什么秘密。昨天进行了很多讨论。因此，我预计是的，就他的支出而言，他支付自己的支出将继续，我认为，保持为零。\n\n问：我想你说的是他的——他的——\n\n第107页\nC. JALBERT\n\n——支出。依你看来，他的支出包括什么？\n\n答：这里有一整份清单。你想逐项看吗？看起来大约有30项。房地产税、财产保险、房主和租户保险、住房维护、修理和保养费用、房屋所有者协会和公寓费用。我甚至不知道这些是否适用。电费、供暖费和天然气费。你想让我继续吗？\n\n问：那么，我们可以同意第4项至第21项包括每月支出吗？\n\n答：同样，就由他支付这些支出而言，我同意。我的理解是，它们将继续保持为零。\n\n问：那么，本文件所载的分析与每月经营报告，即你与Verdolino一起就本案起草的报告，是分开的？\n\n答：正确，因为每月经营报告是另一种报告，那与这里所列内容是完全不同的问题。\n\n问：你能向我解释一下区别吗？\n\n答：我不记得是哪个问题了，是第4项、第5项或第6E项之类的，无论是哪一项，该请求是报告他人代表债务人支付的费用。这并非本项所要求的内容。因此，在该附表中，我们列出了一些资金，而且今后将按照MOR的要求，列明并报告他人代表债务人支付的费用，这再次不同于本项所要求的内容。\n\n问：着重于本项所要求的内容，你的理解是债务人的持续每月支出为零？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：债务人对持续支出的付款为零。\n\n问：你没有调查这是否正确？\n\n第109页\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：仅看本文件末尾的Excel工作表，先笼统地问一下，Verdolino and Lowey是否参与准备这些文件？\n\n答：嗯，我们当然与其他人一起参与了，是的。\n\n问：一般而言，Verdolino and Lowey就这些文件做了什么工作？\n\n答：审查其合理性，协助将其整理成通常会在SOFA和附表中看到的形式。我认为其中一些内容被上传至实际的附表F，因为我认为附表F——嗯，也许不是。我不知道。我不记得是否上传了这些内容，但有可能。因此——所以它从D开始。所有这些内容，我们都与律师合作，而且又是那三方，即Brown Rudnick团队、Aaron Mitchell和——\n\n第110页\nC. JALBERT\n\n——Melissa Francis。\n\n问：我想你说过“审查其合理性”这句话。你是什么意思？\n\n答：嗯，如果我们有任何可以用于比较的信息，我们就进行了比较，或者——或者如果我们有问题，我们就向律师提问。我现在不记得那些问题是什么。\n\n问：总体而言，你能想到在准备这些文件时调查过的任何问题吗？\n\n答：我确信，就其中几项而言，我们想确保没有漏掉一位数或多出一位数，所以我确信我团队中的某人与某人逐一核对过，可能是Melissa或Aaron，以再次确认表格上的数字就是他们原本打算填写的数字。其中不存在人为错误。\n\n问：你能想到任何其他具体调查过的事项吗？\n\n答：我们没有进行调查。\n\n第111页\nC. JALBERT\n\nARONSSON女士：法庭记录员将向你出示标记为Jalbert Exhibit 6的文件。\n\n本案中，该文件作为Docket 77提交。\n\n（随后，记录员于本日将Global Notes标记为Jalbert Exhibit 6，以供识别。）\n\n问：你认得这份文件吗？\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：它是什么？\n\n答：它是关于债务人的资产和负债附表以及财务状况说明书的全球注释、限制说明、方法论和免责声明，而债务人是Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）。\n\n问：这是否是Verdolino and Lowey拟议聘用所涉及的一个具体项目？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：我可以回去看一下吗？我不知道全球注释是否列明，但这些是SOFA和附表不可分割的一部分。因此，这将属于第一项要点：“协助准备财务状况说明书和附表，以及与其相关的所有支持材料和任何必要的修订”。\n\n第112页\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey在准备该文件中的角色是什么？\n\n答：嗯，我们当然协助起草。我们协助审查，特别是具体注释，但Brown Rudnick律师事务所、Aaron Mitchell、Melissa Francis与Verdolino and Lowey之间进行了大量往来和大量工作，Verdolino and Lowey方面的三人，即Matt Flynn（马特·弗林）、Mary Jo Schindler（玛丽·乔·辛德勒）和我本人，均参与其中。\n\n问：为了理解清楚，Verdolino and Lowey在准备该文件时具体做了什么工作？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，正如我所说，我们有大量电子邮件，我们审查了所有内容，我们提出了意见。我们可能在这里起草了一段，或在那里起草了一段。我认为，我们协助该团队确保注释之间、问题之间、SOFA之间以及附表之间的引用，在其相互关联的范围内，均为适当。我们确保书面内容是我们所知的事实。没有调查，但我们进行了许多讨论，并且确保这里所陈述的内容是我们的记忆。\n\n第113页\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：谢谢。翻到第4页，页面中间的第1个问题问道：“你是否拥有或对任何住所、建筑物、土地或类似财产享有任何法定或衡平法上的权益？”其下方第1项的答案写道：“债务人对位于Connecticut（康涅狄格州）Greenwich（格林尼治）373 Taconic Road（塔科尼克路373号）的房地产拥有使用和占有权。”你是否了解为何对某些房地产的使用和占有权与本次提交有关？\n\nAULET先生：对提问方式提出异议。\n\n答：嗯，我不是律师，但是\n\n29（第110—113页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n附表A，我认为是债务人拥有的不动产。我需要回去确认一下，但这是房地产。因此，应当是——他还活着。他居住在一处住宅内，我推定这就是对其居住于该住宅的事实和情形的适当法律描述。\n\n问：再次确认，您对此没有进行独立调查？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您是否对问题1中列出的住宅进行了任何评估？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：第二项要点提到位于Sherry Netherland Hotel（雪莉荷兰酒店）的一套公寓？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：这一部分是您起草的吗？\n\n答：是我起草的吗？我对此表示怀疑。我可能审阅过它。我可能对某些内容提供过意见，但这不是我的措辞。\n\n问：您是否知道，持有该Sherry Netherland公寓法定所有权的实体正在破产程序中？\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n答：嗯，我知道有一项Chapter 11（第11章）程序正在进行。究竟哪些事项属于第11章程序、谁拥有什么，我没有确认或进行调查，但总体而言，我理解该公寓以某种方式处于纽约的第11章程序中。\n\n问：您是否参与过纽约的那些程序？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：翻到下一页，问题3广义而言要求披露对任何车辆的权益。答复称：“债务人可以使用包括豪华汽车和摩托车在内的汽车。”您是否对这一分析进行过任何调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否了解债务人使用哪些车辆？\n\n答：仅凭我的记忆，他——他可以使用一辆豪华车辆，我想还有一辆他的安保人员乘坐的车辆。事实上，他们周三在New Haven（纽黑文）参加341会议时乘坐了该车辆，但我不知道——我知道那是一辆价值很高的车。我不知道是什么品牌，也不知道谁拥有它们。我知道债务人——正如这里所说，债务人可以使用。\n\n问：因此，除这里所说及您此前的答复外，您是否掌握债务人可以使用的车辆的更多信息？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否曾在任何时候目睹债务人使用任何豪华车辆？\n\n答：我不知道您所说的“使用”是什么意思，但他周三在New Haven下车时是从一辆车里出来的。\n\n问：您知道那是什么类型的车吗？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：这是——撤回该问题。这——问题3的答复是否与编制月度经营报告相关？\n\n答：可能相关，是的。\n\n问：为什么？\n\n答：因为我设想，为其使用而提供那些车辆会产生费用，而且再次说明，我不记得具体是问题4、5还是6，例如E项，其中规则要求报告第三方代表债务人支付的费用。嗯，我想到车辆的使用——您知道，我不知道是否有汽车付款、汽油、保险，我不知道，但其中可能会有一些费用。\n\n问：该答复也适用于有关住宅的问题1吗？\n\n律师AULET（奥莱特）：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：债务人居住在一处特定住宅内。据我所知，除了一名会来工作的女佣、安保人员以及可能来访的家人外，那里没有其他人。因此，我设想该住宅的费用会以某个金额列入该月度经营报告，我认为我——我主张其中50%的费用应视为代表债务人支付，因为其配偶也住在那里，而我没有计算孩子们，因为他们只是来探望债务人。因此，我大致将费用更多归于父母双方并予以分摊，但其中不包括购房费用。没有——再次说明，这是指当月支付的款项。因此，我假定他们是在说——我们将披露在该特定期间内代表债务人在各类别中支付的款项，即车辆、安保、住宅——\n\n答：食物。\n\n问：谢谢。问题4涉及船只、航空器、房车，答复提到此前可以使用一艘名为Lady May（梅夫人号）的游艇。除本页所载内容外，您是否了解Kwok先生（郭文贵）对Lady May的权益？\n\n答：没有任何未印在本页上的内容。\n\n问：您是否对此进行了任何独立调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：第6项和第7项涉及家居用品和电子产品。我想我们此前已涉及该问题。就第6项家居用品至本页上的问题17而言——为清楚起见，即问题6、7、8、9、11、17。您是否就这里提及的物品属于Kwok先生，还是属于其他第三方或实体，进行过任何调查？\n\n30（第114—117页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：该答复也适用于有关住宅的问题1吗？\n\n律师AULET（奥莱特）：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：债务人居住在一处特定住宅内。据我所知，除了一名会来工作的女佣、安保人员以及可能来访的家人外，那里没有其他人。因此，我设想该住宅的费用会以某个金额列入该月度经营报告，我认为我——我主张其中50%的费用应视为代表债务人支付，因为其配偶也住在那里，而我没有计算孩子们，因为他们只是来探望债务人。因此，我大致将费用更多归于父母双方并予以分摊，但其中不包括购房费用。没有——再次说明，这是指当月支付的款项。因此，我假定他们是在说——我们将披露在该特定期间内代表债务人在各类别中支付的款项，即车辆、安保、住宅——\n\n答：食物。\n\n问：谢谢。问题4涉及船只、航空器、房车，答复提到此前可以使用一艘名为Lady May（梅夫人号）的游艇。除本页所载内容外，您是否了解Kwok先生（郭文贵）对Lady May的权益？\n\n答：没有任何未印在本页上的内容。\n\n问：您是否对此进行了任何独立调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：第6项和第7项涉及家居用品和电子产品。我想我们此前已涉及该问题。就第6项家居用品至本页上的问题17而言——为清楚起见，即问题6、7、8、9、11、17。您是否就这里提及的物品属于Kwok先生，还是属于其他第三方或实体，进行过任何调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：翻到第8页，问题26要求披露专利、版权、商标等等。答复提到未注册版权以及对发布于各平台的音乐和视频的其他知识产权权益。这指的是什么？\n\n答：整段内容吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：问题26涉及各种知识产权专利、版权、商标、商业秘密和知识产权。债务人——我直接读给您听。“债务人可能拥有未注册版权以及对发布于各种数字和媒体平台（如YouTube、GTV、Twitter）的音乐和视频的其他知识产权权益”，以及——我甚至不知道，GETTR，不管那是什么。“债务人未对其社交媒体资产赋予任何价值，也未尝试将其社交媒体影响力变现。”\n\n第118页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：谢谢——\n\n答：食物。\n\n问：谢谢。问题4涉及船只、航空器、房车，答复提到此前可以使用一艘名为Lady May（梅夫人号）的游艇。除本页所载内容外，您是否了解Kwok先生（郭文贵）对Lady May的权益？\n\n答：没有任何未印在本页上的内容。\n\n问：您是否对此进行了任何独立调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：第6项和第7项涉及家居用品和电子产品。我想我们此前已涉及该问题。就第6项家居用品至本页上的问题17而言——为清楚起见，即问题6、7、8、9、11、17。您是否就这里提及的物品属于Kwok先生，还是属于其他第三方或实体，进行过任何调查？\n\n31（第118—121页）\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：翻到第8页，问题26要求披露专利、版权、商标等等。答复提到未注册版权以及对发布于各平台的音乐和视频的其他知识产权权益。这指的是什么？\n\n答：整段内容吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：问题26涉及各种知识产权专利、版权、商标、商业秘密和知识产权。债务人——我直接读给您听。“债务人可能拥有未注册版权以及对发布于各种数字和媒体平台（如YouTube、GTV、Twitter）的音乐和视频的其他知识产权权益”，以及——我甚至不知道，GETTR，不管那是什么。“债务人未对其社交媒体资产赋予任何价值，也未尝试将其社交媒体影响力变现。”\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n问：除页面所写内容外，您是否了解这指的是什么？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：第二句话指出债务人未对这些项目赋予任何价值，您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您在工作中未对这些项目进行任何估值？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您知道是否进行过任何估值吗？\n\n答：据我所知，没有。\n\n问：问题31要求披露权益和保险单。答复提到其配偶的健康保险单，该保险单没有现金价值。您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：健康保险单没有现金价值是否属于标准做法？\n\n答：除非是对受益人而言——我从未见过健康保险单具有现金价值的情况；如果您有健康保险计划，您去医院且其为您支付账单时，它对您具有很大价值。对于可以出售给第三方的而言，不存在独立价值。\n\n问：您是否了解债务人目前拥有的健康保险单？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：问题53要求披露未列出的类别中的财产，答复提到其在Palm Beach（棕榈滩）Mar-a-Lago Club（海湖庄园俱乐部）的会员资格。如果债务人Kwok先生使用该会员资格，这是否属于Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）会列入月度经营报告的那类事项？\n\n律师AULET（奥莱特）：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我必须作出推测。\n\n问：请继续。\n\n答：嗯，第一份月度经营报告于2月提交。我不知道他是否去过那里，也不知道他是否在3月去过那里。如果他——如果他去了那里，我设想会有差旅费用。我不知道是否会有高尔夫费用，也许他吃了午餐。因此，我设想，如果他实际去了那里并使用了它，月度经营报告中会有——可能会有——会有一些内容；但如果他留在我认为他会留在的地方，即他在Greenwich（格林尼治）安全的地方，这就不会相关。\n\n问：您认为他会留在Greenwich目前所在地的依据是什么？\n\n答：我听了昨天——抱歉，是周三——的341会议。\n\n问：除从周三那次听证会，即341听证会，获得的知识外，您是否对债务人的预期出行或所在地有任何独立了解？\n\n答：我完全不知道他在任何时间点会在哪里。\n\n问：您是否会依赖Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）、Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）和Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）来告知您，在编制月度经营报告时，他可能如何从诸如其Mar-a-Lago会员资格等事项中受益？\n\n答：当然，我肯定会听取律师就此提出的意见。\n\n问：但Verdolino and Lowey不会设法主动寻求有关这些月度开支的信息——\n\n答：嗯，我们会寻求信息，我们会指出该问题，并要求提供对该问题有回应的信息。我无法获得该信息。我们不进行调查。我不会追踪债务人去了哪里或没有去哪里。因此，需要有人向我们告知该信息。随后我们会审阅该信息，但我——我认为，至少在可预见的将来，那个Mar-a-Lago事项不是问题；但如果它成为问题，就会有人告诉我。\n\n问：翻到第11页，附表I，\n\n第122页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）\n\n这里倒数第二句写道：“债务人计划修正于February 15th, 2022提交的Form 122B，其中债务人错误地申报月收入为\\$19,488。”您看到了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您知道这指的是什么吗？\n\n答：知道。\n\n问：是什么？\n\n答：债务人无意中或意外地——我不知道该用什么词——错误地提交了一份Form 122B。其中包括\\$19,488美元，表格——我认为该表格是指月收入，律师审阅后认为那是不正确的，因此他们——债务人提交了一份修正后的122B，或者至少打算提交——我不知道是否已经完成——将该收入排除在外。\n\n问：Verdolino and Lowey是否就该错误列入事项开展过任何工作？\n\n答：我确信我们所做的任何工作都是在——\n\n32（第122—125页）\n\n第126页\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n2　与律师协商。\n3　AULET先生（奥莱特）：对提问形式提出异议。\n4　抱歉。\n5　问：转到第13页，第16题\n6　提到向Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）支付50万的聘用费，并且\n7　随后提到来自Lamp Capital LLC（蓝普资本有限责任公司）的100万美元。对于该项交易，\n8　除本页所载内容外，\n9　您是否知悉其他情况？\n10　\n11　答：我认为昨天曾讨论过\n12　此事——抱歉，是周三在\n13　341会议上讨论过，而且我想我看过一份\n14　Brown Rudnick聘用文件的草案——我\n15　认为我看过，其中似乎\n16　提到了某些内容。\n17　问：您记得那是什么吗？\n18　答：不记得。大致\n19　与这里所写的内容相同。\n20　问：您知道Lamp Capital\n21　LLC是什么吗？\n22　答：由某个并非债务人的人拥有的\n23　实体。\n24　问：您知道它由谁\n25　拥有吗？\n\n第127页\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n2　答：只能猜测。\n3　问：您能否告诉我——我想您\n4　不需要猜测。您是否有任何\n5　信息——关于什么构成您\n6　猜测的依据？\n7　AULET先生（奥莱特）：对提问形式提出异议。\n8　答：我记得当时谈论了很多\n9　事情，但我记得\n10　在341会议期间有人说过一些事情，\n11　但这非常——我当时坐在\n12　房间后面，您知道，而且对我而言\n13　很难从口译员那里听清\n14　英文版本。因此我不能确定，但我\n15　以为我听到有人讨论了\n16　谁拥有Lamp。\n17　问：除您在341听证会上听到的内容\n18　以及您记得看过的这份其他文件外，\n19　您是否\n20　了解Lamp或其经营情况？\n21　答：不了解。\n22　问：下一项，第18题\n23　提到一份日期为November 8th, 2021的\n24　诉讼融资协议。您看过\n25　该协议吗？\n\n第128页\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n2　答：实际上我想有五份。\n3　它们列在附表D中。我\n4　不记得我是否确实看过它们。\n5　我认为至少律师曾向我简要说明过\n6　它们。\n7　问：除——之外，您是否独立知悉\n8　那些协议？\n9　答：不了解。\n10　问：Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）是否就我们谈到的资产进行了其他\n11　调查，\n12　但我们尚未涉及？\n13　\n14　答：没有。\n15　问：我们谈到的那五份诉讼\n16　协议——\n17　答：诉讼融资\n18　协议？\n19　问：是的。谢谢。您以前看过\n20　它们吗？\n21　答：据我所知，没有。\n22　ARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：法庭\n23　记录员将向您递交标记为Jalbert证物7的\n24　文件。\n25　这是在本案中提交的一份文件，\n\n第129页\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n2　其Bates编号为Kwok（郭文贵）\n3　00001752。\n4　AULET先生（奥莱特）：为明确记录，\n5　这是两份独立文件，\n6　所以我们应确保——\n7　ARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：我声明\n8　这是一组文件，\n9　一封电子邮件及其附件。\n10　（随后，电子邮件链由\n11　记录员于本日标记为Jalbert证物7，\n12　供识别之用。）\n13　问：Jalbert先生，我理解\n14　您不在这封电子邮件中。我只是\n15　要就此向您提出一些基本问题。\n16　这是一封电子邮件，往来人包括一名身份被删节的\n17　人员、Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）、Matt Flynn（马特·弗林）以及\n18　Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）。Matt Flynn是您的\n19　同事。我们已谈过其他\n20　人员。附件是关于\n21　February 15th至28日期间生活费用的摘要。\n22　首先，我要问，这封电子邮件来自谁？\n23　\n24　\n25　AULET先生（奥莱特）：我将提出异议，\n\n33（第126—129页）\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n2　并指示该证人就　2　问：\n这是否是我们一直在讨论、\n3　我们先前已在记录中讨论过的相同理由作答。　3　您一直参与编制的月度经营\n4　报告申报文件？\n5　ARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：并且我们将　5　答：\n看起来是的。\n6　继续对这里的删节内容提出异议。　6　问：\n转到申报文件120-1，\n7　即单独附上的散页，这些项目\n8　问：\n转到附件，这份　8　位于底部的项目，您能否概括说明\n9　费用摘要，是由顶部电子邮件中的一名　9　它们是什么？合计数\n10　未知人员提供的，对吗？　10　反映什么？\n11　AULET先生（奥莱特）：对提问形式提出异议。\n12　答：\n是。　12　答：\n您指的是\n13　问：\n可以说这是Verdolino月度　13　$109,827.12吗？\n14　经营报告草案的起点吗？　14　问：\n是。\n15　答：\n我正在看是谁作出的\n16　AULET先生（奥莱特）：对提问形式提出异议。　16　付款，但家属无意中代表债务人，于\n17　答：\n就这一具体　17　February 16th，即申报后的第二天，作出了这两笔\n18　问题而言，是。　18　针对申报前金额的付款。因此，\n19　问：\n抱歉。您是什么意思？　19　出于谨慎考虑，在第1部分\n20　答：\n这回答了月度经营报告中的一个问题，而且，我　20　第E项所列的161\n21　不记得具体是哪个问题，　21　千美元中，这109千美元\n22　但应是第4、5、6E项的某项。　22　已包含在161,323中。因此我们——\n23　第三方代表债务人支付的资金。　23　律师认为，补充\n24　这是初稿。　24　月度经营报告并说明该事项很重要，即\n25　这实际上是一笔申报前付款，但在申报后支付。\n\n第130页　第132页\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n2　ARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：McKenzie（麦肯齐），标签　2　该信息表明这实际上是一笔\n3　19。　3　申报前付款，但在申报后支付。\n4　证人：您问完了吗？　4　问：\n明白。谢谢。那么，这里的\n5　ARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：没有。　5　总费用$161,323，如果我们\n6　AULET先生（奥莱特）：我们是否应将　6　从中扣除无意付款总额\n7　背面另行标记为一份独立证物　7　$109,827，该\n8　还是——　8　金额反映什么？\n9　ARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：我通常将　9　答：\n除这两笔付款以外的付款金额，即\n10　它们标记为一件。　10　在February 15th至\n11　AULET先生（奥莱特）：好的。　11　February 28日期间由第三方代表\n12　证人：我们会再次将它们放在一起，并去掉蓝色　12　债务人作出的付款。\n13　纸张。　13　问：\n这是否会反映在我们查看的\n14　Jalbert证物7中生活费用表的最终版本\n15　（随后，电子邮件链由　15　中？\n16　记录员于本日标记为Jalbert证物8，　16　答：\n是。\n17　供识别之用。）　17　AULET先生（奥莱特）：对提问形式提出异议。\n18　问：\n法庭记录员将向您递交标记为Jalbert　18　问：\n据您所知，该数额中是否还包括\n19　证物8的文件。　19　任何其他内容？\n20　答：\n您已经交给她了吗？　20　答：\n嗯，无意中包括了。我们\n21　ARONSSON女士（阿伦松）：这是本案中　21　发现，创建该表格的人在\n22　作为案卷120及文件120-1提交的　22　证券总金额中，无论最终\n23　文件。　23　总金额是多少，其中有一笔于February 10作出的\n24　\n25　申报前付款，\n\n34（第130—133页）\n\n1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）　1　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n\n2　被无意计入February 15th至28日的　2　这些类别是否得到恰当说明，\n3　付款中。因此，这将在下一份经营报告中　3　因为这远非最终版本。这——\n4　予以更正。　4　存在一些错误，而且我们还与律师及其他人合作，试图确定\n5　问：\n因此，本经营　5　C栏所支付款项中有多少比例乘以\n6　报告中包括了向证物8所列律师事务所作出的两笔无意付款？　6　分配百分比，以得出\n7　\n8　答：\n是，正确。　8　总额。我们与编制人合作，以确保\n9　问：\n我们谈到的月度经营生活　9　附表中的说明\n10　费用，以及您所说将予以　10　准确。我们试图确认\n11　更正的另一笔付款，对吗？　11　数字准确。我们未能及时获得\n12　答：\n它包含在161中。　12　该信息，因而无法做到这一点，\n13　我们在编制March报告时将把它剔除——通常，　13　但随后我们与律师合作，运用我们的判断\n14　该表格的运作方式是，您会有当期支付额和　14　审查分配\n15　累计额。我们将从累计额中扣除那一小笔　15　百分比。\n16　款项，以便今后保有正确数额。　16　\n17　问：\n查看这份草案，即证物7中的生活\n\n19　费用图表，其中有七个项目。对吗？\n20　问：\n可以说　20　答：\n是。\n21　Verdolino and Lowey就这些无意付款所发挥的作用，是某种程度上　21　问：\n可以说\n22　复核月度经营报告中列入的金额吗？　22　Verdolino and Lowey核对了类别\n23　\n24　答：\n我们作了尝试，但鉴于　23　名称，以确保其\n24　准确描述这些项目中所列费用？\n25　信息可获得的时间\n\n第134页　第136页\n\n2　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n信息可获得的时间　1\n2　C. JALBERT（贾尔贝尔特）\n答：\n我们已尽力而为，是。\n3　以及表格必须提交的时间之间，　3　问：\n还有哪些信息会有助于\n4　与附表编制人存在沟通失误，　4　帮助您作出该判断？\n5　该问题将得到纠正。　5　答：\n如果我们能够看到\n6　问：\n谁是附表的　6　实际收款人和\n7　编制人？　7　实际支付款项，可能会有助于我们进行分类。\n8　答：\n我无法告诉您。　8　\n9　问：\n您指的是哪一份附表，　9　问：\n但您没有收到那些信息？\n10　是这里这份文件，即月度　10　答：\n没有——当时没有。\n11　经营报告、证物8吗？　11　问：\n您收到的有关这些项目的信息范围，\n12　答：\n这个东西（示意）。　12　是否包括在这里这张图表中？\n13　问：\n这里的161数字　13　答：\n截至我们提供所有——我确信有一份\n14　是否指证物7中的这份电子表格，　14　更新版本，因为这与\n15　并反映了您的修改，即Verdolino　15　这里不一致（示意），然后我们——在我们为\n16　and Lowey的修改？　16　本次证言提供信息很久之后，\n17　答：\n161是证物8中最终　17　一直在进行讨论，因为我们正准备\n18　数字加上109的总和。　18　提交——抱歉，April的March MOR。\n19　问：\nVerdolino and　19　问：\n我们将转到——我认为是\n20　Lowey为得出最终数字进行了什么　20　最终版本，但我们谈到了这些类别、您所说的金额\n21　工作？　21　\n22　答：\n我们与律师、　22　\n23　Aaron Mitchell（阿伦·米切尔）和Melissa Francis（梅利莎·弗朗西斯）合作，试图　23　\n24　审查——我们没有细节，但我们　24　\n25　试图提出问题并确保　25\n\n第138页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n问：在提交本文件时，你没有能够核实归入各类别金额的信息。对吗？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：哪些信息会有助于你交叉核对这些金额？\n\n答：如我所说，收款人姓名、服务内容说明以及资金金额。\n\n问：百分比分配，这是什么意思？\n\n答：例如，安保在这张表中为 \\$43,655.44。该文件的起草人以及他或她咨询的任何人认为其中40 percent应归入该项。在与我们团队和律师团队讨论后，我们认为这可能应当是one hundred percent，因为唯一的原因——安保完全与Kwok先生及其安全有关。如果不是因为Kwok先生，其妻子、孩子或该住所内的其他人就不会需要安保。\n\n第139页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n答：因此，我们提议作出修改，我认为确实已改为a hundred percent。\n\n问：在修订这些百分比分配时，你是否完全依赖于从Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）、Aaron Mitchell（艾伦·米切尔）、Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）以及这名未披露人士处获得的信息？\n\n答：第一轮来自该未披露人士。在我们从该未披露人士处获得这些信息后，大部分讨论是在我们律所、我的律所和律师之间进行的。这还要持续多久？因为如果还要持续一会儿，我现在想去洗手间。我会很快。\n\nARONSSON女士：我们可以休庭。现在停止记录。\n\n录像员：现在时间是1:22 p.m.。停止记录。\n\n（随后，短暂休庭；恢复后，截至本日，该电子邮件链由书记员标记为Jalbert Exhibit 9，供识别之用。）\n\n第140页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n录像员：现在时间是1:28 p.m.。恢复记录。您可以继续。\n\n问：我认为你已收到标记为Jalbert Exhibit 9的文件。该文件载有Bates Kwok 00001684。你认得这份文件吗？\n\n答：认得。\n\n问：翻到附件，据你所知，这是否为February 15th至February 28th期间生活费用的最终版本？\n\n答：我认为是。\n\n问：我说明一下，如果你将\\$51,495.67加上那109 thousand——\n\n答：161。\n\n问：那么我们理解一致，这就是最终版本？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：该最终版本是否反映了Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）对一名未知人士提供的初稿所作的修改？\n\n答：嗯，当然——如你从电子邮件中所见，我们提出了建议，但律师显然审阅过，并协助作出了最终决定，而且我确信他们也向债务人核实过。我没有。\n\n第141页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n问：那么逐项说一下这五项建议，你为何将餐饮提高至50 percent，或者为何建议将餐饮提高至50 percent？\n\n答：因为有一名丈夫和一名妻子，one hundred percent除以二就是50 percent。\n\n问：对于草稿为何以Exhibit 7中的方式分配这些数字，你是否有所了解？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我认为，最初文件的制作人——据我记忆，最初文件的制作人考虑到，债务人的女儿以及可能一两名其他人偶尔会出现，因此我认为他们将部分费用归于那些人。\n\n36（第138页至第141页）\n\n第142页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n答：但我们在与律师协商后认为，那些人在场的唯一原因是他们来探望债务人，因此才产生了该费用。所以我认为他们应将50 percent归于丈夫，将50 percent归于妻子，这就是我们得出50 percent的原因。\n\n问：除你刚才向我说明的内容外，对于建议提高至50 percent，你还有其他理由吗？\n\n答：我记不起有。\n\n问：第2项是安保提高至100，而查看Exhibit 7中的草稿，该项为40 percent。你建议将安保提高至100的理由是什么？\n\n答：同样，存在任何安保的唯一原因都完全是债务人。因此，为谨慎起见，我们将该费用，即该费用的one hundred percent，归于债务人。如果妻子没有嫁给Kwok先生，她可能不会有安保方面的担忧；女儿或其他人有时出行时，也需要安保。因此，无论出于何种原因，他们的安保都与债务人有关。我们建议提高至a hundred percent。该问题在该小组中进行了讨论，所有人均同意100 percent。\n\n第143页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n问：你假定保留安保的主要原因与债务人直接相关，其依据是什么？\n\n答：与Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）和Aaron Mitchell（艾伦·米切尔）进行讨论；他们在数次电话中确认，债务人受到骚扰、威胁，并且因其生存安全而感到恐惧；并且据我被告知，家人感到害怕的程度，是因为他们与父亲的关系。\n\n问：关于你将安保提高至one hundred，你是否还有任何尚未阐明的理由？\n\n答：嗯，将one hundred percent的费用归于债务人是非常保守的——这意味着所有该等费用——我们本可以保持在30 percent，并且可能提出一个似是而非的论点说明为何可以是30 percent。我们希望采用——我认为该小组最终推理的一部分是，由于他的安全担忧，代表债务人报告全部费用是保守的——这就是理由。\n\n第144页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n问：谢谢。第3项是公用事业费提高至50 percent，我说明一下，Exhibit 7中为30 percent，而你将其归于与餐饮相同的解释。是否还有其他——\n\n答：没有，原因相同——相同——对其中大多数项目而言，都是同一主题，只是百分比不同。\n\n问：第4项涉及家政服务。我认为Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）建议将修理和维护改为家政服务？\n\n答：嗯，事实证明，一旦我们能够与某人交谈并获得数字背后的一些信息，我们发现那是这15天中女佣、女佣们、女佣服务或清洁服务的费用，而不是维护费用。因此，这只是如实称呼的问题。如果我们当时看到了明细，我们本会更及时地了解到这一点。\n\n第145页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n问：你将分配比例从30提高至50 percent的理由，是否可以说与背后的理由相同——\n\n答：是一名丈夫和一名妻子。你知道，他们代表其他人所做的任何其他清洁，唯一原因是Kwok一家在那里。即债务人及其配偶。\n\n问：你在页底指出，“in our opinion, it's best to be more conservative”。这也是你——\n\n答：是。\n\n问：——建议提高分配比例背后的另一个理由？是吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：我确实想谈谈保险从30 percent变为zero percent的情况。\n\nARONSSON女士：我想，Makenzie（麦肯齐），你能把Tab 14递给我吗？\n\n答：都办好了吗？\n\n问：是。在我向你出示该文件前，你是否记得关于保险项目从30 percent变为zero percent的信息？\n\n答：在我的同事查明事实后，我记得曾与他谈过此事，是的。\n\n问：你记得那次交流的什么内容？\n\n答：嗯，我认为他查明，第9项中的13 thousand dollars保险付款one hundred percent涉及位于New York City（纽约市）的Sherry公寓，而债务人在该期间并未居住在那里。因此，如果有人在支付Sherry的那些账单，我认为那是Sherry的问题。\n\n第146页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n答：而非为债务人的利益，因为据律师告诉我，根据事实，各方的理解是，他——他对该不动产没有权益。因此，他在月度经营报告所列费用中不应占有任何百分比。\n\n（随后，截至本日，该电子邮件链由书记员标记为Jalbert Exhibit 10，供识别之用。）\n\nARONSSON女士：法庭书记员将向你递交标记为Jalbert Exhibit 10的文件。这是本案中出示的一份文件，载有Bates Kwok 00001691。\n\n问：我理解你不在这份文件中，但我想讨论其中几个问题。你认得这份文件吗？\n\n答：不认得，但我认得该主题。\n\nHARBACH先生：给他一点时间阅读。\n\n第147页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n证人：好的。\n\n问：翻到第2页，Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）指出，“since MK doesn't own the Connecticut property, can you please just explain the applicability of the following entries as his monthly expenses? And what type of insurance is it?”你看到这段了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：你理解Francis女士在这里问什么？\n\n答：既然债务人不拥有Connecticut（康涅狄格州）的该房产，你们能否说明下列项目作为其月度费用的适用性；她还在问是什么类型的保险。\n\n问：如有的话，你对她的问题有什么看法？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我希望能正确回答这些问题。\n\n问：你希望回答月度报告——\n\n答：我希望我们已经正确回答了她的问题。\n\n第148页\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔贝尔）\n\n答：我的意思是，这将纳入月度报告，但我希望我们已正确回答。\n\n问：就实质而言，你对她在这里的问题有什么看法？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不想猜测她在想什么。\n\n问：那么你并不了解——Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）也不了解她在这里提出的问题？\n\n答：我有我的理解。\n\n问：好的。翻到第一页，Flynn先生回答：“correct, he doesn't own it but he lives in the Connecticut house so these expenses that are paid are benefitting him”。你是否了解Flynn先生在这里所说的意思？\n\n答：这就是他所说的原因：既然他住在那里，就应当——在问题8的月度经营报告中，应有某种程度的该等费用归于他。\n\n38（第146—149页）\n\nC. JALBERT（C. 贾尔伯特）　C. JALBERT\n\n问：弗林先生（Mr. Flynn）继续说道：“我还有一个关于保险的问题，因为这是谢里公寓的保险。”您明白他在这里所指的问题吗？\n\n答：明白。\n\n问：您能向我解释一下吗？\n\n答：嗯，在第8项——不，是第9项，这一项的原始版本中有保险。我们不知道这是为哪处房产投保。坦率地说，我们拿到它时，认为这是格林尼治住宅的保险，债务人及其配偶实际居住在那里。我们后来从事实层面得知，这实际上是谢里的保险；而当我们得知这是谢里的保险时，由于债务人并不住在那里，也不拥有该房产，根据律师提供材料的审阅，它应当被删除，而这正是我们所提议的，即将其删除。\n\n问：它最终被删除了吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：弗林先生继续说道：“我不——我不确定它是否应被包含在这里？”\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：对此项目的原始分配，我认为是——\n\n哈巴赫先生（MR. HARBACH）：就在这里（示意）。\n\n问：——为13 thousand，且该数额反映在第2页，为$13,611。除弗朗西斯女士（Ms. Francis）的电子邮件外，您是否对该信息有任何独立了解？\n\n奥莱特先生（MR. AULET）：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：没有。这来自梅利莎·弗朗西斯（Melissa Francis）。我不知道她从哪里得到这个数字，也不知道为什么。\n\n问：您是否调查过格林尼治房产的保险情况？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：为什么没有？\n\n答：我们要求由在——方面具有正确信息的人，向我们提供自February 15th至February 28th期间代表债务人以现金、支票、电汇、HCH或任何其他方式支付的所有费用。我们没有留下任何——我们没有要求——我们没有留下任何限制。\n\n第150页\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n我认为这就是他的意思——“在这个计算中，但有兴趣听取您的意见，并且也询问Craig（克雷格）。”您是否记得他就此征询您的意见？\n\n答：记得。\n\n问：您的意见与弗林先生在此处的意见相同吗——\n\n答：相同。\n\n问：您是否记得就此与弗林先生交谈过？\n\n答：记得。\n\n问：转到这里最上面的电子邮件，在第1页的这封邮件链中，弗林先生问道：“在此期间为谢里支付了多少？”您看到这一点了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：您知道该问题的答案吗？\n\n答：我完全不知道。而且，我也不知道他为什么问这个问题。\n\n问：这正是我要问的问题。为什么——支付的金额——会影响它是否应被纳入月度经营报告？\n\n我们只是说，把所有该等信息都给我们。我们收到了一份汇总表。您看过它；直到我们开始提问，以了解部分背景以及这些数字背后的情况后，我们才开始作出评估，并改变我们认为法律团队和我们原先认为适当的处理方式。\n\n继续询问\n\n哈巴赫先生询问：\n\n问：您刚才说，起初您和您的团队认为——第13项——抱歉，我认为您说您假定$13,611是用于格林尼治房产，因为那是他居住的地方。我的理解正确吗？\n\n答：是的，先生。\n\n问：后来有人告诉您，13,611实际上是为谢里支付的，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：而在那时，您并未询问在该期间是否确实为格林尼治房产支付了任何保险费，您没有问这个问题？\n\n39（第150—153页）\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n问：那个问题？\n\n答：没有，我们假定——实际上，Matt（马特）已确认这是在该时间段内作出的所有付款的清单。因此，我们掌握了完整范围，并不存在另一笔保险付款；而且，您知道，我们大多数人——许多人拥有过房屋。根据我自己的经验知识，通常每年支付一次房屋保险费。通常——对于谢里而言，这13 thousand dollars可能只是针对一个价值2.5 million dollar实体的一年付款。他们没有告诉我们那是一笔付款，所以我没有问。\n\n继续询问\n\n阿伦松女士（MS. ARONSSON）询问：\n\n问：因此，我认为我们已经讨论了您就February 15th至February 28th期间的月度经营报告所做的工作。我们一直在审阅该文件。对吗？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：关于您为编制该文件所做的工作，您还能想到任何我们尚未讨论的事项吗？\n\n答：一时想不起来。\n\n问：我认为您提到过，您正在编制下一个报告周期？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能描述一下您的总体流程，以及该流程与您针对February 15th至February 28th期间的报告周期相比，如有不同，具体有何不同吗？\n\n答：因此，月度经营报告基本上是呈现信息。就该债务人而言，月度经营报告中有两类信息，即问题E，代表其在31天期间，即March 1至March 31期间支出的资金。我们将会——我们将会查明——我们将取得一份清单。这次，我们将取得一份清单，以便我们能够看到有哪些项目，并且能够——我们能够与律师就已支付的款项进行更有依据的讨论。这些内容将被汇总、分类并载入附表E；此外，我们正在与布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所（Brown Rudnick）、梅利莎·弗朗西斯和亚伦·米切尔（Aaron Mitchell）合作，以确定专业费用的应计额。所有专业人士、州方专业人士、委员会专业人士、债务人专业人士、正常业务过程——被指称为正常业务过程的专业人士，所有人都包括在内，因为我们需要记录应计额。因此，经营报告并非仅仅要求说明该期间已支付的金额。它要求说明的是——新表格要求说明未支付的金额，而我们未能及时取得这些信息以编制February那一份。因此，我们将在这份March报告中补上，确定February的应计额，并查明March的应计额；之后我们将拥有正确信息，并且必须在后续过程中持续维护。当然，随着时间推移，如果事情按照债务人所希望的方式发展，将会支付这些费用。因此，将会有更多应计额，继而有付款；对于破产财产专业人士以及委员会及其专业人士，情况也是如此。它将滚动反映负债情况，而现金将在第1页报告。这将产生对美国受托人（United States Trustee）费用的负债——他们的——他们的——这是费用，不是佣金。该费用完全取决于月度经营报告期间的现金支出。\n\n问：您预计——撤回该问题。除您将从布朗·拉德尼克、亚伦·米切尔、梅利莎·弗朗西斯以及一名身份不明人士处获得的信息外，您是否预计会就未来的月度经营报告进行任何调查？\n\n奥莱特先生：对提问形式提出异议。\n\n答：我不知道您认为——我不会——我们将从某人那里取得一份报告。该报告将列出在特定期间内作出的所有付款。\n\n40（第154—157页）\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n我们将凭借自己的专业知识并与律师一道审阅该报告，以确保一切合理。我们可能会根据电子表格中显示的内容提出问题，但我不会要求提供已付款支票副本、银行对账单或已支付的发票。因此，不会对此进行调查，只会作出合理性或常识性核查，并与律师协商，以确保我们理解该表格上的内容以及我们将要报告的内容。\n\n问：因此，实质上，您将依赖我们所谈到的那些个人向您提供的汇总数字？\n\n答：再次说明，除非我们会根据收到的信息提出一些询问。如果再次出现保险项目，我们将询问保险是为哪项财产投保。如果再次出现维修和维护项目，我们将确认那不是女佣。我们将根据所见内容运用一些常识，并与律师协商，但在看到——并且我希望很快看到——之前，我不会知道我们将做什么。今天是April 8th吗？\n\n问：谢谢。好的，简要回到证物8，我认为这是February 15th, 2022至February 28th, 2022期间的最终生活费用报告。我认为您提到其中包含了一项错误金额。您能再次解释一下您的意思吗？\n\n答：我不记得确切数字，但在安保项目，即第9行中，此处提到的金额为43 thousand dollars。该43 thousand dollars包括一笔——按我的记忆，大约12或14 thousand dollars——于February 10支付的款项。因此，我们收到这份原始报告时，并不了解背景；当他们——当他们向我们展示背景和清单时——我们看到了February 10。因此，我们意识到，我们犯了与两名专业人士有关的时间相反的错误，他们支付了申请破产保护后、申请破产保护前的款项。这里，他们支付的是申请破产保护前、申请破产保护前的款项，但该款项本应从月度经营报告中排除。这是一项正当收费。它不是多付款项或类似情形。它只是不应被报告在February月度经营报告中。\n\n问：因此，是否可以说，您后来收到了对这些项目更详细的细分，其中包括在这——\n\n答：我相信我们收到了更详细的资料——但那已经远远超过当时。那时的一切都是通过审阅、交谈、梅利莎和亚伦与某人交谈，以及马特与某人交谈来完成的。全部通过电子邮件和口头方式完成。直到较后时间，在报告提交很久之后，而且实际上是在我们提供我们取得的记录之后——即详细清单——我们才收到详细项目表；那时我们发现，哦，月度经营报告有问题。这只是因为，您知道，编制这些文件的人不习惯这些规则，不习惯哪些内容必须展示——披露，哪些内容不会披露。我们尝试向他们提供指导，而他们只是犯了一个小错误。我们将在下个月予以纠正。\n\n问：谢谢。您可以把它放在一边。您是否记得收到来自美国司法部（U.S. DOJ）某人的、关于月度经营报告的询问？\n\n答：我认为实际上是我先联系了他们，而我先联系他们是——这也是如何——是——我不知道是否有人编制过月度经营报告，这里有人吗？因此，直到December 31或January 31，月度经营报告是一份——两份——这两页（示意），第8页，也就是现在的第8页和第9页，而且可能还有一页——我原以为是五页，可能是四页。我曾在数个案件中提交过这些月度经营报告，而这三个月来一直令我感到非常困扰，我会——我会。\n\n41（第158—161页）\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n会——每月经营报告的方式，在第一页底部，它允许您在录入数据时使用“保存”，以便您可以审阅数据，但在您点击一个写着“将数据发送至美国受托人网站”的按钮之前，它会保留水印；它随后会进行其应进行的操作，而当它这样做时，它不断返回附加的六页以及这些无意义的内容（示意）。因此，我实际上联系了U.S. Trustees Office（美国受托人办公室），询问我们做错了什么。当时已是午夜，我们正试图提交这份文件。他说，不，大家都有同样的问题。我们刚刚终于弄清楚，这就是应当发生的情况。因此，那时我们开始与他交谈；随后，当他看到报告时，他有了我们的电子邮件地址，而我们——他正在寻求对161的支持，我相信这就是他所要求的。我手头没有该文件，即便有，我也没有——我不——但这是我的记忆；他联系的原因是为了取得——取得该文件，并取得我认为是今后专业费用的应计数。\n\n问：我们此前谈过您在Chapter 11（第11章）个人破产案件中的经验。回顾您在这些案件中的经验，是否有——您是否有——您能否列举任何一个案件，在该案件中，您见过债务人的惩罚性资产与所述负债之间存在如此巨大的差异？\n\n答：没有。在我的个人案件中，373 million dollars的负债是我见过的最高数额。\n\nARONSSON女士：我们没有更多问题了。\n\nAULET先生：我没有问题。\n\nGOLDMAN先生：我有几个后续问题。我只会花几个小时。\n\n证人：太好了。您介意我去拿一瓶苏格兰威士忌吗？\n\nGOLDMAN先生：也给我拿一瓶。我是Irve Goldman——\n\n摄像员：请您能把麦克风给他吗？\n\n第162页　第164页\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n问：您是否就每月经营报告以及其中项目明细的进一步细节进行过通话？\n\n答：不是通话。您有当时的电子邮件记录。范围非常——我非常有限。我给他的电话是就我的三个案件提出一个一般性问题；我正试图提交这些文件。他能够回答我的问题——我的主要问题。随后，当他看到每月经营报告时，他说，嘿，我需要这个，而我们显然会安排提供。\n\n问：那么，是否是受托人的询问促使Verdolino and Lowey（韦尔多利诺和洛伊）要求就我们审阅过的每月经营Excel表中所载项目提供更多细节和明细？\n\n答：不是。无论如何，我们本来就想这么做。那只是——给了我们更多的依据，可以向他们提出，说，嘿，我们得着手处理这个。这是我们无论如何都会做的事情。\n\nAULET先生：好的。我能否请暂停正式记录片刻，以便我可以——\n\nHARBACH先生：当然。\n\n摄像员：时间是1:56 p.m.，现暂停正式记录。\n\n（随后进行了非正式记录讨论。）\n\n摄像员：时间是1:58 p.m.。现恢复正式记录。您可以继续。\n\nGOLDMAN先生询问：\n\n问：下午好。我是Irve Goldman，来自Pullman and Comley（普尔曼和康利律师事务所），代表Creditor's Committee（债权人委员会）。您提到您获得了破产重组专家认证。我理解得对吗？\n\n答：顾问。\n\n问：顾问，多久了？\n\n答：嗯，实际的资格认定是在1999，但在1999年，当我获得该资格认定时，我必须累计超过四千小时的工作经验，并且当时已在该专业领域从业八年。\n\n42（第162—165页）\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n因此，是30年前。\n\n问：在您受聘担任Chapter 11案件中的专业人员时，您通常会运用该专业知识吗？\n\n答：当然会运用其中一部分，是的。\n\n问：您认为债务人财务状况的哪些方面需要重组？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：需要重组，我不理解您的问题。\n\n问：嗯，您是经认证的破产重组专家。您在Chapter 11案件中的受聘工作中运用该专业知识。债务人的财务状况中，有什么是您认为需要重组的？\n\n答：嗯，您知道——\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n问：您认为其需要重组吗？\n\n答：不，我不这么认为。\n\n问：您不这么认为？\n\n答：绝对不这么认为。\n\n问：那么，您认为他为什么提交Chapter 11申请？\n\n答：嗯，债务人需要重组。我不认为——\n\n（随后，一部手机响起。）\n\n证人：哦，很抱歉。那是提醒我在2:00做某事的提示，我想不起我该做什么。只是确认它没有——当它之后再次响起并打扰您时，那是什么？债务人的重组，如果您指的是所提出的问题——在一个作为企业的普通Chapter 11案件中，如果存在实际重组，有很多事项需要考虑。您必须重组债务、担保债务，也许是夹层债务、无担保债务，也许还要处理应付款项，各种各样的——这里并非如此。\n\n问：您刚才所描述的是会计方面的琐碎工作吗？\n\n答：我不同意。\n\n问：不，您不同意？\n\n答：编制SOFA和编制MOR，您认为那全都是琐碎工作吗？\n\n问：好吧，我不和您争论这个。本案中，您认为有什么需要重组，如有的话？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：是的，我不知道您想问什么。\n\n问：是否有资产需要重组？\n\n答：据我了解，唯一的资产是——我认为律师称之为诉讼资产之类的东西。\n\n问：那么，它们将如何被重组，或者如何成为重组的一部分？\n\nAULET先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n答：您可能问错人了，但如果存在进行中的诉讼，我想会有和解谈判，可能会有调解，可能会有仲裁。有人会试图将那些资产变现为现金，以用于偿付债权人。我不知道我们是否会参与其中。\n\n答：而且我——我完全遗憾的是，我们是作为财务顾问而非债务人的会计师被聘用。您在该聘用动议中看到的大部分内容，都是破产程序中非常重要的事项。财产清单、SOFA、每月经营报告、报税表编制、债权分析；我不知道我们是否会在其中发挥作用。这取决于债权的性质。大多数这些债权将接受法律分析，但对于提交债权申报的人，可能有一百个理由——可能附有某种会计事项，他们确实希望我们调查。因此，我们并非仅仅因为我们认为将会进行重组而被聘用。破产是一项程序。有大量文件由大量人员传递。这一特定债务人，据我了解，已超过70岁。他甚至没有电子邮件地址。不知道如何使用电脑。不懂技术。他不可能自行编制每月经营报告；而且几乎在每个案件中，都会有一名会计师负责报税。会有一名会计师负责——协助编制每月经营报告。即使公司有财务主管，我们仍会在某些案件中介入，因此目前可能尚无重组。总有一天会有一项计划。我不知道我们将发挥何种作用，但如果我们需要——如果律师和债务人需要我们发挥作用，我们会这样做；但在那一天到来之前，在Chapter 11案件的整个程序中，有大量必要的日常工作需要完成。\n\n43（第166—169页）\n\nC. JALBERT　C. JALBERT\n\n问：作为您受聘范围的一部分，其中有一项要点表明，您将就以下事项提供协助——\n\n法庭记录员：抱歉，律师。我需要更清楚地听到您说话。\n\n问：就审阅债务人的账簿和记录提供协助，以审查可能可撤销的交易，例如优先受偿和欺诈性转让请求权。您表示您没有审阅债务人的任何账簿和记录，对吗？\n\n答：目前，到目前为止，是的。\n\n问：您是否索取过任何账簿和记录？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否打算索取？\n\n答：这取决于律师希望我们发挥什么作用，以及债务人希望我们发挥什么作用。如果他们希望我们在审查申请前付款方面发挥作用——这通常是我们在所办大多数案件中都会做的——我们会编制清单；在本案中，该清单已经存在。我们可能会要求提供支持材料以确认，但完全取决于负责办理案件的团队。我们并不负责办理案件。我们——我们——我认为我们是团队的重要成员，但我们不是——会计师事务所并不主导案件。债务人及其律师主导案件，这与每个案件的情况相同。\n\n问：您知道债务人的账簿和记录存放在哪里吗？\n\n答：不知道。\n\n问：您知道债务人在申请前是否有一名会计师吗？\n\n答：仅从律师处获知。\n\n问：谁是会计师？\n\n答：会计师？\n\n问：是的，我问过您——\n\n答：哦，实际上，我收回刚才的话。我看过实际的报税表。每一名报税表编制人都必须在其编制的报税表上列明姓名。因此，曾有——至少有人编制过报税表。至于他们还做过什么，我不知道。\n\n问：好的，会计师叫什么名字？\n\n答：我不记得。\n\n问：截至目前，报税表是否已向本案任何一方出示？\n\n答：我想我们已经出示了，因为我们有这些文件。它们本应通过电子邮件发来。因此，我认为它们已就此事出示。我认为确实如此，但它们是由——我推测是一名纽约或康涅狄格州会计师——编制的非常简短的报税表。我不知道是谁。\n\n问：您只是——您显然看过它，只是现在不记得那名会计师的名字？\n\n答：我不——嗯，是的。我甚至不确定我是否看过。我不知道。\n\n案号 22-50073　文件 404-26　提交日期 05/20/22　录入日期 05/20/22 11:52:18　第46页，共\n\nC. JALBERT（克雷格·贾尔伯特）\n\n如果，在我们当时努力办理所有事项时，我们使用了那些材料，是因为我们需要其中的一些信息。梅丽莎向我们推荐了它们，以处理律师认为重要的某些问题；我们确实查看了它们，但我当时查看的内容会不只是编制人的姓名。当时这并不重要。\n\n问：您是否曾与债务人交谈过？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：何时？\n\n答：周三，在341听证会上，为了自我介绍。\n\n问：据您所知，这是您与债务人交谈的唯一一次吗？\n\n答：我不会说中文，而他显然不会说英语。因此我没有和他交谈过。或者是中文。我不确定是哪一种。抱歉。\n\n问：您没有收到破产申请后预付聘用费，对吗？\n\n答：我不知道。\n\n问：您在没有破产申请后预付聘用费的情况下，依据了哪些信息（如有）才放心承接本案？\n\n答：我从事这一行已有35年。我不确定。我不记得曾经获得过破产申请后预付聘用费，但是我的律所与——\n\n（此时，一部手机响起。）\n\n证人：该死，抱歉。现在关掉了。我们——我们是在 Massachusetts（马萨诸塞州）执业的专业人士，并在 Delaware（特拉华州）、New York（纽约州）、Connecticut（康涅狄格州）、Rhode Island（罗得岛州）、Massachusetts（马萨诸塞州）、New Hampshire（新罕布什尔州）、Vermont（佛蒙特州）和 Maine（缅因州）办理案件。我们在几乎所有这些州都代理 Chapter 7（第7章）受托人。我们很可能代理并为 Rhode Island 的几乎每一位第7章受托人、Massachusetts 的每一位第7章受托人、Maine 的几位以及 New Hampshire 的几位开展工作；在我们甚至尚不知道案件是否会有任何资金之前，就先完成50、60、70、80\n\n第174页　第176页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您确信您的费用会得到支付吗？\n\n答：我不知道自己是否确信。我只是希望如此。\n\n问：您认为您的费用将从何种来源支付？\n\n答：将从破产财产中支付。据我理解，如果我们将获得付款，该款项将来自破产财产。我并未考虑过、也未就任何其他付款来源达成任何协议。\n\n问：您的意思是诉讼请求或追偿款吗？\n\n答：我预计本案中唯一持有预付聘用费的人是 Brown Rudnick（布朗·拉德尼克律师事务所）。其他所有人——即债务人的专业人士或委员会的专业人士，以及向法院提交申请并获法院批准受聘的专业人士——都会寻求获得资金。我们都将从同一来源寻求付款。该来源将会是什么，如果它最终会存在的话，\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：在我们甚至尚不知道案件是否会有任何资金之前，就完成数千美元的工作，这并非闻所未闻。这是我们所作的一项投资。现在，我并未在本案中作出投资。无论我们发生了什么费用——我不知道那是多少——我希望能够收回；但如果不能，那么我将像过去许多、许多、许多、许多次那样，作出核销。\n\n问：再说一次，我认为您没有回答我的问题。\n\n答：哦，好吧——\n\n问：如果您仅依赖您在破产案件委聘方面的经验，且这就是您在没有破产申请前或申请后预付聘用费的情况下承接本案所依据的一切，您的意思是这样吗——\n\n答：我不理解您的问题。\n\n问：您在没有破产申请前或申请后预付聘用费的情况下承接本案时，依据了哪些信息（如有）？\n\n奥莱特先生：对问题形式提出异议。\n\n45（第174至177页）\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：我与许许多多律师合作，当律师打电话询问我们是否有兴趣参与某个案件时，我就参与该案件。\n\n问：所以，您是基于 Brown Rudnick 要求您参与而作出依赖？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：就这些？\n\n答：是，此后就是破产程序。无论发生什么，就发生什么。\n\n问：您在决定——\n\n答：我认为——我认为我知道他资产有限或没有资产，而且我认为我知道他有许多正在进行的诉讼；但是——也许我是个傻瓜，但我只需向另一个人负责，他让我像他经营自己的业务一样经营我的业务；我的想法是，当律师打电话说他们有案件时，我们就作出回应，因为如果我不回应，\n\n第178页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：也许下次他会打电话给另一名会计师。因此，我没有做您认为正常人为了保障付款本应做的所有事情。\n\n问：您在多大程度上依赖了 Golden Spring（金泉）的财务状况？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在同意受聘参与本案之前，您没有对 Golden Spring 进行任何尽职调查？\n\n答：我相当确定，在我同意参与本案时，我甚至不知道 Golden Spring 的存在。\n\n问：Lamp Capital（兰普资本）呢，您是否对 Lamp Capital 进行过任何调查？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在参与之前，您是否询问过这两个实体的财务状况是什么——\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：——在参与之前？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：在同意承接该委聘之前，是否有人承诺 Golden Hill（金山）或 Lamp Capital 将向您支付费用？\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：绝对没有。\n\n问：您是否曾与 Golden Hill 的任何代表进行过沟通？\n\n哈巴赫先生：Golden Spring。\n\n问：Golden Spring。\n\n答：我曾与某人通过电子邮件联系——首先，Melissa Francis（梅丽莎·弗朗西斯）使用的是 Golden Spring 电子邮件地址。她是债务人的律师。从一开始我就被告知这一点。唯一的其他联系——\n\n问：她是债务人的律师，还是 Golden Spring 的律师？\n\n答：债务人。\n\n问：Melissa——\n\n答：Francis。\n\n问：但她有一个 Golden Spring 的电子邮件地址？\n\n答：正确。她在他们提交给我的所有这些电子邮件中都在收件人之列。\n\n问：据您理解，她是债务人的律师——\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：她和 Brown Rudnick 都明确告诉我，她是债务人的律师，Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）也是如此。Brown Rudnick 也是如此。\n\n问：好的。据您所知，他们是否属于聘用日常业务专业人士的申请的一部分？\n\n答：我不知道他们是否会由破产财产支付费用。我不知道他们——他们——他们提交了什么动议以获得支付。我并未——我并未代理他们，也没有询问他们。\n\n问：那么回到您是否曾与 Golden Spring 进行过任何沟通的问题——\n\n答：我的同事 Matt Flynn（马特·弗林）曾与 Golden Spring 的某人进行过一次或两次电话交谈。我们在这里看过若干电子邮件，而您知道，6、7、8、9，无论多少封，那个人未被识别，但我没有与那个人交谈过。我曾——我在电子邮件往来中，并且我恰好向那个人写过一封电子邮件；实际上，我写电子邮件时是发给 Melissa 和 Aaron 的。\n\n46（第178至181页）\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：您知道为什么该人的姓名在证物中被涂黑吗？\n\n答：知道。\n\n问：为什么？\n\n答：因为您听到了 Golden Spring 的律师所说的内容。鉴于围绕本案的问题，他们担心其员工的安全。我对此一无所知。我只是按吩咐行事。我不会披露姓名。\n\n问：据您理解，是应 Golden Spring 律师的要求而将其涂黑的？\n\n答：嗯，我不知道是 Golden Spring 的律师还是 Golden Spring 本身。我不知道——我不知道是谁提出的。实际上，我认为直到前一天——前一天，也许是周三，我才得知——得知——得知这些文件被涂黑了。\n\n第182页　第184页\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n问：据您理解，根据债务人的说法，他在破产申请前的所有生活费用均由 Golden Spring 支付吗？\n\n答：嗯，那些费用是由其他某人支付的。我不能明确地说是由 Golden Spring 支付的。\n\n问：那么，无论该人或实体——无论该人或实体是谁——各份附表中列明的破产申请后生活费用，是否与破产申请前支付的费用一致？\n\n答：我们没有就破产申请前付款的性质、付款金额或任何事项进行调查。因此，我没有任何——任何可供比较的信息。随着月份推移，该信息将会逐步形成；但我认为，个人15天费用的最终——最终金额结果大约是28或29 thousand dollars，计15天。因此，将其乘以二，即60 thousand dollars\n\nC. JALBERT\n\n答：其中三分之二是安保费用。\n\n问：为破产申请后生活费用提供资金的个人或实体是否为 Golden Spring？\n\n答：我不知道。这不是问题之一，也没有人主动提供该信息。问题只是说——问题问的是，是否有第三方在破产申请后代表债务人付款。我们尽己所能回答了该问题。我们会纠正仍然存在的一处错误，但据我所知，该问题没有问、他们也没有告知我们是谁在支付款项。\n\n问：您也没有询问？\n\n答：没有。我不知道这会如何影响——该信息不在月度经营报告中，因此我认为这不关我的事，这就是我会被告知的。\n\n戈德曼先生：我没有进一步问题。\n\n奥莱特先生：我没有问题。\n\n法庭录像员：我可以结束今天的记录吗？\n\n戈德曼先生：可以。\n\n法庭录像员：我们于下午2:18停止记录，至此结束 Craig Jalbert（克雷格·贾尔伯特）今日所作的证言。\n\n（于是，于下午2:18，对该证人的询问结束。）\n\n第183页　第185页\n\n°\n°\n°\n°\n\n47（第182至185页）\n\n声 明\n\n本人特此证明，本人在经正式宣誓如实作证后，作出了上述证言。\n\n本人进一步证明，上述笔录是真实、正确的笔录，记录了本人在此前所述时间和地点作出的证言。\n\n14　1\n\n证 明\n\n纽约州\n）\n：SS.：\nKings County（国王县）\n）\n\n本人，LENAYA LYNCH（莱奈娅·林奇），纽约州境内的公证人，特此证明：\n\n上述载明接受询问的证人已依法宣誓，且该询问是真实记录该证人所作证言的记录。\n\n本人进一步证明，本人与本诉讼的任何一方均无血缘或婚姻关系，且本人对本事项的结果不具有任何利益关系。\n\nCRAIG JALBERT\n\n于20___年______________的____日，在本人面前签署并宣誓。\n\n公证人　14\n\n特此为证，本人于2022年4月8日亲笔签名。\n\n<%24350,Signature%>\n\nLENAYA LYNCH\n\n第186页　23\n\n证 物\n\nJALBERT 证物\n\n证物编号　证物说明　页码\n\n证物1　证言笔录通知\n\n证物2　电子邮件链\n\n证物3　电子邮件链\n\n证物4　债务人的申请\n\n证物5　官方表格106Sum\n\n证物6　全球注释\n\n证物7　电子邮件链\n\n证物8　电子邮件链\n\n证物9　电子邮件链\n\n证物10　电子邮件链\n\n（证物由法庭记录员保管。）\n\n索 引\n\n询问人　页码\n\n阿隆松女士\n\n哈巴赫先生\n\n阿隆松女士\n\n哈巴赫先生\n\n阿隆松女士\n\n戈德曼先生\n\n48（第186至188页）\n\n[& - 373]\n\n&　86:10,22,24　132:20　134:13\n161　24350\n188:21\n\nદિદ\n1:15,18　2:3,12　103:13　115:4,4,8　135:13,17　140:18　26\n120:3,12\n0　119:21　124:25　162:21　28\n183:23\n164:4　166:7,18　132:23\n161,323　28th　72:9　129:23\n\n32:16　167:5,18　169:24　133:5　133:12　134:3\n\n35:10　111　187:10　ી રિટ\n187:21　140:14　152:23\n\n140:8　11:53　90:21　16th\n132:17　154:21　155:11\n\n147:17　2:18 34:22\n12　119:19,21\n17　159:10\n\n129:3　85:15 159:18　18\n48:22 127:22　29\n183:24\n\n6:9　75:21 131:25\n120　19\n131:3　2:00\n167:11\n\n2:18　120-1 131:25　19,488 125:6,15　2:18\n185:5,8\n2:14\n06601　132:6　17:5\n1979　3\n1　125:3,14,19\n122b　17:8\n1983　23:23 35:8,12\n\n3:16 10:14.17\n1　124\n6:8　1987\n17:10　96:25 97:4,8,13,24\n17:10 23:22 72:10　129\n187:11　1999\n165:24,24　115:13 116:21\n97:9 113:14.18　12:22 90:25　1:22\n139:21　144:12 187:7\n114:14 118:3　19:8 42:12\n13　1:28\n140:4　3,850 96:5\n132:21 151:14　55:14 103:14　1:56\n165:8　30\n155:17 157:6　126:5 146:19　1:58\n165:12　7:5,19 11:2,22\n187:5　152:7 153:14　1 a\n94:19,22 95:8　107:6 144:4,6,14\n133:25 147:10\n10　154:11　95:11\n1 b　145:11 146:4,11\n166:4\n147:15 159:19,23　13,611 152:8　2　30th\n2:4\n187:5,14　153:15,20　2\n23:22 32:14,18　31\n17:10 72:10\n100 2:18 142:15,18　187:12\n131　33:2,4 41:6 97:13　74:24 77:7 121:16\n143:8 187:19　139\n187:13　105:21 142:14　155:17,18 161:18\n\n1:19 2:5,10　14\n19:8 98:7 146:7　148:3 152:8 187:6　161:18\n第100\n44:7　159:18\n\n6:9\n101　147\n187:14　154:13\n2.5　32\n187:6\n\n187:20　15\n77:6 89:10　20\n45:8 186:19　341\n16:17,22 45:13\n106a 94:21　97:25 145:4　2019\n79:18　45:14,17 46:14,15\n106sum 93:14　183:22,24　2020\n79:19　46:19,24 47:8,12\n94:2 187:9　187:20\nી રેઝે　2021\n127:24　47:13,18 51:15\n109 132:22 135:18　187:21\n154　2022\n1:10 3:5　69:5 116:2 123:15\n140:17　第15 63:14 72:9　125:4 159:9,10　123:18 126:13\n109,827 133:7　125:4 129:23　188:19　127:10,18 174:15\n133:11 134:3　21 45:8 49:9 84:9　342\n16:16\n109,827.12 132:13\n10:17 1:11 3:4　140:14 152:23　92:21 107:14\n45.9\n22　17:13 176:6\n\n187:7\n10:24\n11:15,19　154:21 155:11　22-50073 1:63:22\n11 1:5 21:2,4　ી રેતે-વે　第22 3:4　36 95:13 96:2,4,8\n32:11 55:3 70:3　96:18 105:18\n16　23　96:16\n\n74:19 81:6,11　126:5　97:8　113:19 164:12\n\n[4 - 顾问]\n\n4　95:17,19,24\n61　ਰਤੋ\n187:9　172:24 173:9.19\n\n47:24 48:3 91:4\nব　62\n95:15,16,17　2　173:23 179:2\n96:9,12,17 97:13　6:49\n39:10　1:11 3:4\n上午　会计师 21:5\n107:14 108:8　108:8 130:23\n6e　11:15,19 90:21　21:6,7,8\n113:13 117:4　7　Aaron（亚伦）25:17,19,25　会计 22:21\n119:4 130:23　7\n1:18 2:4,9 81:6　26:10 31:4,7 32:9　63:21 168:17\n144:20 187:8　86:25 95:18　56:18 57:3 59:3,4　170:2 172:13\n7:18 138:18\n40　103:12 119:16,21　59:10,18 99:2,7　账户 69:21,22\n142:16　128:24 129:11　102:11 103:17　应计 70:20\n\n159:15,16　133:16 135:14　104:12,16 105:3　156:4,9,17,19\n43,655.44.\n138:16　136:18 141:17　105:13 106:7　163:2\n\n72:11　142:16 144:14　109:24 110:18　156:25\n应计额\n\n187:8　176:18,20,22　112:15 124:2　69:2\n产生\n181:22 187:11　129:18 135:23　已产生 78:23,25\n5　70\n6:19 7:16 169:2　139:8 143:14　79:6\nറ\n93:12,15 108:8　176:25　156:3 157:15　10:6\n准确\n117:4 130:23　7006\n2:14　160:16 181:4　136:11,12\n187:9,19　77\n100:20 111:6　182:3　10:2.9\n准确地\n\n6:19 7:14,18　78\n93:19　136:24\n118:13 141:9,10　能力 9:25 10:5\n能够 53:7 78:6　习惯于 53:9\n141:14 142:7,8,9　8　79:11 136:13　19:15\n行为\n142:12 144:13　8\n1:10 119:21　138:3 144:25　4:8 188:15\n诉讼\n145:11 176:25　120:3 131:16,21　活动 63:22\n21:3 126:6\n500　134:7 135:11,18　163:11　80:12\nરેન્ડર\n75:13,17 76:2　149:25 150:9　绝对地 82:6　实际的\n109:17\n505b\n75:5　159:7 161:19,20　167:3 180:3　137:7 165:23\n第50\n44:6　181:22 187:12　丰富 132:20　173:3\n51.495.67\n140:17　7:16 176:25\n80　142:21　85:21 140:16\n增加\n\n122:11　83\n17:9　102:23\n接受　增加\n155:25\n94:22 95:23\nરેરે　2:13\n850　访问 115:23　额外的 163:18\n\n95:17,19　87\n17:10　119:6 124:16　地址 6:6,7,8\nરજ\n95:24 96:2　第8\n3:5 127:24　意外地 125:13　169:4 180:10,19\n6　159:5 188:19　账户 37:25　地址\n162:20\n9　38:24 52:15 63:19　管理 4:6\n7:5 11:2,8,21,22\n\n97:24 98:7 111:4　64:17 65:3 66:19　行政的\n111:8 117:5　0\n119:21 139:24　72:6991:6,8 92:11　77:17 78:7,10\n140:7 146:20　92:16 147:2　81:8\n119:16,18,21　150:10 159:15　172:20　告知 22:20\n181:22 187:10　161:20 181:22　会计\n17:8　53:261:11\n6:19 7:14 75:11\n60 -　187:13　会计师 18:16　顾问 17:24 18:7\n75:19 176:25　48:10 82:17\n90　70:22 80:6 168:4　21:5,6 34:7 36:23\n183:25　83:22 92:23　169:9,10 172:23\n\n[顾问 - Aronsson（阿伦松）]\n\n37:7 39:8 40:20　分配 145:25　121:17 122:12　适用的\n107:11\n\n41:20 43:2 48:9　允许 12:20 38:23　130:21 148:21,23　申请 48:2,7\n48:21 49:5 70:22　65:2 87:11　151:18 163:11　48:18 49:2 175:21\n165:21,22 168:4　获准 80:12　178:20　181:7 187:8\n顾问 62:4.5　81:20　回答 34:20　适用 53:17,22\n事务 14:6 55:20　允许 82:15,17　148:25 149:4　103:22\n111:18 112:5　162:4 175:22　177:13 184:12　适用 118:2\n影响 184:19　修正 89:7 125:3　8:5,23\n回答　任命 22:13\n宣誓书 48:25　经修正的 125:19　130:20　感谢 35:4\n49:7　修正案 60:7　预期 47:16　方式 22:20\n关联的 42:3　修正案　50:19 52:9 54:16　适当的 73:14\n关联关系 4:13　55:21 112:6　55:6 59:25 61:19　113:8 114:7 153:9\n165:16\n下午　金额 13:9　61:21 63:25 67:16　批准 70:16\n代理人   90:2 91:7,20　81:22 96:5 118:12　76:4,24 79:21　已批准 62:10\n91:21,24　133:8.9 134:17　106:15 157:13,17　64:22\n153:12 166:4\n以前　137:25 138:12　预期的 60:5　四月 1:10 3:4,5\n同意 3:14 59:12　159:11,15 183:17　60:11 62:9 68:15　137:22 159:5\n91:696:16 100:22　金额 51:22　预期 78:16　188:19\n107:13,17　132:19 134:23　任何人\n83:24　仲裁\n171:4\n已同意 143:8　138:4,9 156:14　145:16　领域 12:11 22:12\n179:12　分析   68:6 83:4　再也\n116:9　22:21\n同意 179:9,25　84:3 87:19 89:18　142:11 164:15　19:4\n场所\n协议 55:13　92:25 95:2 96:19　任何人的\n161:15　170:8\n辩称\n61:8 67:25 78:6　105:9 107:20　41:14\n任何时候　论点 117:21\n91:22 127:23,25　115:18 168:10　无论如何\n69:16　144:6\n175:13　已分析\n168:14　无论如何的 70:8　Aronsson（阿伦松）   2:5 4:18\n128:8\n协议　分析\n80:18　87:6 163:23 164:2　4:18 6:2,12 7:4,13\n128:16,18　82:4　公寓 101:6,9　10:12 11:12 12:9\n向前  40:8 122:20　Andersen（安德森）\n17:9　102:6 114:17　26:20,25 27:13\n97:15\n飞机　167:15\n惹恼　115:2,7 146:21　29:18 32:11 34:21\n119:5　8:20 9:11\n回答　1 50:4　35:6 47:22 48:5\n活着 114:5　9:19,21 24:21　道歉 35:2　83:11 88:13 90:18\n指控 40:24　26:22,24 27:12　56:22 167:9　93:10,17 97:6\n81:5 156:7\n被指控的　28:12 29:11,11,13　显然 28:19　99:22 103:5,6\n指控 83:18　29:17 36:11 38:17　174:21　111:2 128:22\n联盟 2:3 4:20　53:16,21 54:12　出现\n100:20　129:7 130:5 131:2\n6:13 10:23　83:20 88:16　出庭 4:16　131:5,9,23 139:18\n分配的 141:16　101:20 104:18　4:12\n出庭人员　146:6 147:13\n分配\n117:25　105:16 113:17　适用性　154:17 164:14\n分配\n145:11　116:8,21 118:2　148:6,15　187:19,20,21\n152:3　119:6 120:5\n\n[安排 - 返回]\n\n安排\n163:15　164:9 170:15,17　23:9 28:8 182:10　164:16 165:3\n\n安排　170:19 171:5　律师 2:3,9,13　166:12,22 170:12\n54:20　178:17,17　14:16 15:6,16　170:22 177:25\n到达\n136:8　指定 74:24　25:8 32:3 40:21　184:24\n17:9\nArthur（阿瑟）　52:18 86:17\n协助　46:23 47:6 98:9　26:13\n撰写\n阐明 143:22　协助 45:11　98:21,24 99:6,14　当局 75:11\n归因于\n归因于\n118:17　80:17 82:8 84:23　109:23 142:3　授权 48:7\n141:25 149:24　85:18 86:6 88:21　147:3 178:3.3　48:19 49:3\n归因于\n120:22　112:3171:12,15　归属 138:4　获授权的 4:6\n121:7　协助\n15:19　可听见的\n8:24　汽车\n归因 142:22　51:9,12 109:14　音频\n3:12,12　115:16,16\nAsia（亚洲）2:3 4:20 6:14　112:10,11 113:3　审计\n75:13,18,20　可获得的 135:2\n10:23　141:4　审计 22:21　137:16 160:22\n除外    15:22 47:5　关联的\n66:20　149:22\n应当　69:16\n避免\n67:7 83:17 161:9　117:2　八月 17:10　可避免的 82:9\n询问\n36:8 47:19　协会\n107.9　Aulet（奥莱特）2:10 5:3,3,12　83:2 84:13 171:17\n53:23 56:15,21,22　9:6 92:20\n假定　9:17 12:4,6,24　知悉 25:17 30:19\n64:20 110:7　92:24 173:18　13:6 24:20 26:16　88:6 90:8,10\n151:21 152:19　假定的 150:13　26:23 27:11,13,16　114:24\n172:25 178:6　153:15 154:3　28:7 29:19 34:10　糟糕的 47:11\n询问 13:17,19,20　假定 28:15　37:16 39:5 46:20　168:23,24\n34:14 67:18 98:22　50:23 72:13　57:22 58:18 61:4　非常\n88:4\n101:2,18,21 102:2　118:21　64:14 66:13 77:4　一会儿\n82:9\n105:15 148:12,17　假定　78:21 79:22 83:7　b\n149:12 151:4,5　143:10\n83:13 84:25 85:8\n153:5 156:11,12　附上\n69:14　88:3,8,16 91:9　2:65:21 6:5 7:5\no\n156:13 162:22　已附上 79:16　92:2 93:5 95:9　11:2,22 75:13,17\n170:23 181:14　168:18　96:10 97:2 98:15　76:2 94:17,20,21\n询问 108:11,17,18　附件 129:9　99:23 101:17　94:23 95:12 96:13\n113:14 115:13　129:21 130:8　102:8 103:24　187:2\n120:4 121:16　140:11　104:13 106:18　19:25\n婴儿\n122:11 151:14　尝试\n120:24　108:21 111:22　照看孩子 19:10\n166:9\n方面　出席 45:13　112:22 113:24　学士 17:7\n同意 37:9　出席 45:14,16　118:4 122:18　返回 7:18 11:19\n评估 101:14　47:11　126:3 127:7 129:4　13:20 27:6 29:24\n153:7\n评估　出席\n4:11　129:25 130:16　34:3 41:5 49:13\n78:3\n资产　46:14　131:6,11 132:11　55:12 69:25 71:16\n88:2 94:2\n资产　注意\n105:20　133:18 141:18　82:16 90:25 91:4\n104:7 111:16　律师 2:17 4:17　148:20 149:7　95:17 103:7\n120:23 128:12　6:12 9:18 13:5　152:11 157:20　111:23 112:13\n114:4 127:11\n\n[返回 - 子弹]\n\n131:7 140:4 159:7　海滩\n122:14　119:8 121:2　Bridgeport（布里奇波特）\n1:3\n\n159:21 162:10　涉及 76:9,9　大的 34:4,15,16　2:14 3:21\n165:12 167:14　32:15 140:8\n承受　35:20 52:23　简要陈述 90:22\n173:2 181:15　42:18\n野兽　最大的 19:4　14:21\n简要地\n背景 17:2　美丽的\n164:20　账单 45:19 72:12,23　65:24 128:5\n153:6 159:21,22　开始\n4:16　73:6　163:24\n带来\n余额 69:20　180:12　已计费 67:13,14,16　7:21 22:9\n广泛的\nHank（汉克） 37:25 52:15　代表 12:23 21:7　账单 19:14 55:3　广泛地 109:5\n64:21,24 65:6　21:8 38:21 108:11　72:3 122:4 146:24　115:13 132:8\n69:18 91:6,16　108:15 117:6　活页夹 69:14　提出 40:3,20\n158:7　118:14,23 130:24　Birnbaum（伯恩鲍姆）2:17　167:17 168:3,19\n银行的 91:18　132:17 133:12　一点\n14:20 17:2　Brown（布朗）2:8 5:4\n破产案　144:10 145:15　21:25 24:3 46:17　15:21 23:10,16\n164:5　152:23 155:17　139:16　24:6,8,18 25:8\n破产 1:2　184:11　每两周一次 66:25　26:5,6,10 30:9\n3:20 20:11,22　指使\n182:16　血液 188:15　31:20 32:3 38:10\n21:13,24 22:6,11　相信 24:4 45:2,5　131:13\n蓝色　38:12 39:2,16\n32:25 38:15 39:19　50:18 72:14 99:19　簿记员　43:23 49:24 56:13\n39:22 44:6,7,7　100:7 144:21　52:16 53:14,18,19　57:4 58:25 59:6\n51:2 64:25 74:13　160:12 162:21　53:20,25 66:19　59:10,17 64:20\n75:4 77:15,24　167:4 175:7　账簿 82:8 84:12　83:18 98:25 99:6\n80:4,13 81:2,23　相信\n27:19　84:14,18 92:18　102:11,17 103:18\n82:15 83:23 90:3　102:23\n属于　171:16,20 172:17　103:18 104:10,16\n115:2 168:7,22　119:23 160:7　Boston（波士顿）17:6,6　104:17 105:7,12\n177:17 178:11　曾属于 101:15　18:16　106:6 109:24\n基础 59:9　102:6 103:14　瓶子 34:25 42:8　112:14 123:25\n基于 27:16,21　属于 104:8　164:21　126:7,14 139:7\n28:23 63:5 72:25　Ben（本）   13:5 14:16,21　底部 49:11　156:2 157:15\n87:14 158:5 159:2　ל: 24　105:19 132:9　175:17 178:7\n基本的\n129:16　受益人　145:19 162:3　181:3,5\n基本上 37:9　121:25　购买 101:23　桶 19:3\n39:11 155:13　利益 124:3　117:18　21:19 155:14\n依据 37:14,21　受益 149:18　盒子 2:14　预算 61:10,23\n66:25 69:7,8　最佳 13:2 28:9 52:4　大脑 93:8　61:24 62:2\n73:10 80:11 81:7　56:10 60:9,14　中断   9:9,12 85:9　预算编制 42:10\n81:8,8 90:7　137:2 145:20　85:15 139:19　63:16 86:15\n123:12 143:9,23　184:13　细目　预算 42:13,13\n145:9　更好 86:23　160:10　建造 78:2\nBates（贝茨）32:15 35:9　103:25 171:14　细目　建筑物 113:16\n129:2 140:8　超出 14:13　163:19　子弹 55:17 61:7\n147:17　38:18 53:13 116:7　92:19 112:3\n\n[子弹 - 某些]\n\n114:16 171:10　96:1 97:1 98:1　可请求的\n144:5　175:17 176:5\n\n业务 6:7 22:10　99:1 100:1 101:1　称为 5:21 20:18　177:3,6,18,23\n41:21,24,25 42:8　102:1 103:1 104:1　41:8 89:22　178:5,5,23 179:10\n42:11,22 43:3　105:1 106:1 107:1　致电 145:7　179:13 182:12\n167:19 178:21,22　108:1 109:1 110:1　电话 25:11,15　案件 21:2,4 40:16\n184:20　111:1 112:1 113:1　58:24 93:6 143:15　41:25 64:10 90:5\n企业 19:5　114:1 115:1 116:1　178:23,25 181:19　92:8 161:24\n162:7\n\n按钮　117:1 118:1 119:1　摄像头\n8:11　163:10 164:11\n117:23\n\n购买　120:1 121:1 122:1　取消 158:7　166:7,18 169:14\n\nC　123:1 124:1 125:1　能力 18:2　172:6 176:14\n126:1 127:1 128:1　资本 126:8,20　177:17\n2:2 3:1 4:1 5:1,21\n\nC　129:1 130:1 131:1　179:14,15,25　现金\n36:14 37:10\n6:17:18:19:1　132:1 133:1 134:1　116:3,17 117:9\n\n汽车　37:19 42:12,13\n10:1 11:1 12:1　135:1 136:1,7　67:679:4\n\n照顾　61:10 62:12,13,23\n13:1 14:1 15:1　137:1 138:1 139:1　职业生涯 47:12　63:15,15,22 69:9,9\n16:1 17:1 18:1　140:1 141:1 142:1　97:14 117:19\n\n汽车　69:21 78:18 79:2\n19:1 20:1 21:1　143:1 144:1 145:1　1:6 3:22 6:17\n\n案件　79:3 86:18 87:13\n22:1 23:1 24:1　146:1 147:1 148:1　15:24 33:21 41:19　121:19,22,24\n25:1 26:1 27:1　149:1 150:1 151:1　41:22,23,24 42:19　152:21 157:5,10\n28:1 29:1 30:1　152:1 153:1 154:1　43:3,4 44:3,13,14　171:6\n31:1 32:1 33:1　155:1 156:1 157:1　48:10 49:15 50:22　抓住 88:25 89:2\n34:1 35:1 36:1　158:1 159:1 160:1　50:23 51:2,5,20　89:14,15 156:16\n37:1 38:1 39:1　161:1 162:1 163:1　52:10 54:17 55:8　类别 7:21\n40:1 41:1 42:1　164:1 165:1 166:1　55:11,16 56:10　118:24 136:2,23\n43:1 44:1 45:1　167:1 168:1 169:1　59:7 60:9,14　137:25\n46:1 47:1 48:1\n49:1 50:1 51:1　170:1 171:1 172:1　61:22 62:9,19　分类\n173:1 174:1 175:1　64:2 66:5 67:4,17　137:9\n52:1 53:1 54:1　176:1 177:1 178:1　68:12,21 69:2　已分类\n55:1 56:1 57:1\n58:1 59:1 60:1　179:1 180:1 181:1　70:4,7,9,11 71:5,6　155:24\n61:1 62:1 63:1　182:1 183:1 184:1　71:19 73:11,25　类别\n138:4\n64:1 65:1 66:1　185:1 186:2 188:2　74:2,7,11,19 75:9　猫 89:12\n67:1 68:1 69:1　188:2　75:14,22 76:22　谨慎 46:21 83:7\n70:1 71:1 72:1　计算 69:10　77:21 78:5,25　132:20 142:21\n\n计算 151:3　79:5 81:6 82:24　保留意见 89:3\n73:1 74:1,9,10　日历 72:7　84:7 86:4,25 90:6　抄送 26:12 27:10\n75:1 76:1 77:1\n78:1 79:1 80:1　19:10 31:18\n\n致电　93:20 107:24　3:10 167:8\n\n单元\n81:1 82:1 83:1　45:18 79:11 102:4　111:5 131:24　手机 176:10\n84:1 85:1 86:1　104:25 163:4,7,9　164:7 167:18,25　蜂窝式 3:8\n87:1 88:1 89:1　166:5,16 170:18　169:8,24 170:9　87:18\n\n美分\n90:1 91:1 92:1　178:3　172:10,10,13,15　某些 40:17 94:3\n172:15 173:12　113:22 174:6\n93:1 94:1,17 95:1\n\n[当然 - 一致同意]\n\n当然\n22:3　158:10　客户\n18:25 19:13　70:23 156:6 157:3\n\n62:20 72:20 84:3　已核查\n64:24　关闭\n70:5　165:18 175:20\n91:11 102:14　141:5　结案\n75:15　共同\n158:25\n106:19 109:8　支票\n66:20　衣服\n103:12　沟通\n26:9\n112:10 124:7　中文\n174:22　俱乐部\n122:13　30:11 57:11 99:4\n140:25 166:8　选择\n76:6　代码\n75:4 80:13,14　99:5\n\n认证\n17:20　中央情报局\n18:13　82:15　已沟通\n17:23 18:9　CIRA\n18:7,14,15　Cohn（科恩）\n2:17　58:16 98:24\n\n认证　流传\n32:4,8　附属担保\n42:14　沟通\n18:12　已流传\n88:7　同事\n45:5,15　30:13\n\n经认证的\n17:23　情形　100:25 129:20　正在沟通\n18:4,6 165:19　15:25 33:13 60:6　146:14 181:18　104:19\n166:15　73:14 114:8　同事\n13:7　通信\n证明\n186:4,8　引用\n164:7　30:18 31:24　65:14,19 180:4\n188:8,13　公民\n65:6　收集\n13:13 177:9　181:16\n\n链条\n32:17 35:11　城市\n58:8 146:22　学院\n17:6,6　公司\n89:21\n38:6 103:21 104:9　民事\n11:2　18:16　169:13\n129:10 131:15　主张\n52:20 80:19　栏\n136:7　比较性\n139:23 147:9　80:24 81:3,5,16,21　合并\n72:7　183:19\n151:14 187:6,7,11　168:13,16　来\n50:23 53:14　比较\n110:6\n187:12,13,14　声称\n125:5　54:21 71:16 74:18　相比\n110:6\n\n变更\n146:11　主张\n52:24 54:8　74:20 169:14　完整\n69:18\n\n已变更\n139:4　81:7,10,12,25 82:5　172:6 173:14　完全\n74:5\n146:4　82:11,18 88:2　175:9,11　108:3 168:2\n\n变更\n43:24　90:2 168:10,14　到来\n19:15　合规\n42:24\n44:10　171:18 175:15　100:23 118:8　复杂\n43:4\n\n正在变更\n139:3　澄清\n96:15　167:14　52:23\n144:22 153:8　97:3　舒适\n176:4　复合\n139:2\n\n章节\n1:5 21:2,3　清晰\n119:20　即将到来\n34:25　全面\n55:3 70:3 74:19　清洁\n145:5,15　62:23 78:18 142:5　89:6\n81:6,6,11 86:10,22　清楚\n24:12 28:18　162:10　计算机\n169:5\n86:24,25 115:3,4,8　39:14 98:10　Comley（科姆利）\n2:12 5:7　关于\n12:21\n164:4 166:7,18　101:21　165:17　关切\n142:25\n167:5,18 169:23　明确地\n56:18 79:2　评论\n36:21,21　144:11\n176:17,20,22　141:3　37:8,8,9　已得出结论\n185:10\n\n指控\n160:5　文书性\n55:5,7　评论\n112:25　得出结论\n185:6\n\n图表\n136:18　客户\n4:23 5:2　商业\n70:7　结论\n28:20\n137:14 153:3　30:8 34:5,6 35:21　佣金\n157:9　一致同意\n39:11\n\n核查\n73:3 110:18　36:23 37:6 38:3　委员会\n2:13　一致同意\n37:12\n134:23 138:8　39:8　5:8 20:19 21:4,5　38:4\n152:21 158:7,10　62:3 66:23 70:21\n\n[条件 - 覆盖]\n\n条件\n9:25　119:18 121:11　控制人\n169:13　43:14 62:3,4\n\n公寓\n107:10　124:5 125:23　谈话\n8:17　70:21 97:12,18,20\n\n协商\n158:10,25　128:11 134:21　谈话\n3:8　98:12,14 99:19\n\n有信心的\n175:3,5　135:20 154:19　27:17 44:5 46:22　100:17 124:8\n\n确认\n65:2　155:2 157:18　47:6 102:15,16　135:22 136:5\n86:10,21 114:4　保守的　已转换\n70:12　141:3 158:11\n136:11 158:24　143:25 144:9　副本\n69:18　169:19 171:14\n172:8　145:21　副本\n8:14 94:22　172:2,14 180:11\n\n确认　考虑\n157:22　100:21 158:7　180:14,24 181:4\n20:17　167:20　版权\n120:4,6　182:19\n\n已确认\n70:12　考虑　120:14,17　律师的\n182:16\n115:5 143:14　141:22　公司\n74:10　计数\n118:15\n154:4　一致的\n183:13　公司\n74:7　国家\n42:6\n\n冲突\n24:12　选区　公司\n74:7　国家\n42:22\n\n混淆\n69:17　21:11,13　74:9,10 75:23　县\n188:4\n\n国会\n19:18　咨询\n98:17　正确\n58:19　一对\n60:14 92:7\n\n猜测\n122:19　126:2 142:3　62:17 63:10 72:13　99:21 110:13\n\nConnecticut（康涅狄格州）\n1:2　已咨询\n64:21　76:23 94:25 95:25　147:20 164:18\n2:14,18 3:21 17:5　138:18,18　97:23 102:25　176:23,23\n76:13,14,19　咨询\n88:21　107:25 108:25　过程\n30:21\n113:20 148:5,14　联系\n25:3 30:19　109:2 114:12　52:19 56:16 62:8\n149:17 173:19　180:13　121:12 134:8,19　70:24 156:7,8\n176:15　已联系\n23:6,8　149:15 152:20　169:22 181:7\n\n联系\n11:5　联系人\n25:4　153:21 156:19　课程\n17:15\n15:6 24:19 33:21　包含\n59:22　171:20 174:25　法院\n1:2 3:20 4:4\n34:8 36:4,9,25　71:14 107:21　175:2 180:21　5:10,19 6:15,25\n39:2,18 43:2,25　136:24 163:19　186:9　8:11 10:13 13:10\n46:3,10,18 50:14　主张\n28:3　已更正\n134:4　32:12 35:6 40:12\n50:25 51:6,20　内容\n101:8　134:12　45:3 47:22 55:2\n57:16 60:2 61:15　有争议的\n6:23　正确地\n148:22　62:10 78:9 87:12\n61:19 63:9 64:12　背景\n20:12 22:6　149:4　93:10 101:10\n66:11 68:15 73:19　继续\n3:13 74:8　成本\n117:2,25　111:2 128:22\n76:25 78:17 80:21　74:16 130:6　118:10,13,18　131:19 147:13\n83:5,19 84:14,19　持续\n16:16　141:25 142:6,22　171:13 175:21,22\n84:23 85:21 86:2　103:4 153:10　142:23 144:3　187:15\n87:20 88:15 89:19　154:16　145:3　覆盖\n16:25 107:3\n92:15 96:20 97:11　继续\n68:21　昂贵的\n89:6　128:13\n97:16 98:6,22　150:2,24　成本\n144:4　已覆盖\n13:11\n103:8 104:7 106:3　持续\n17:17　律师\n4:10 5:4,7　76:20 83:14 85:19\n107:23 109:11　137:20　9:12,21 13:6,15　89:8 103:9 119:17\n110:11 112:21　25:21,24 30:3　154:18\n\n[CPE - 描述]\n\nCPE\n17:15,16　147:11　120:22 121:7　扣除 79:21\n\nCraig（克雷格） 1:14 3:17 6:5　注明日期 127:24　122:8,17 124:18　延期 78:3\n48:25 151:4 185:7　女儿 141:23　125:3,5,12,18　延期\n1 રેરને તે\n186:15　143:2　126:23 130:25　定义\n82:19\n161:25\n\n疯狂　David（大卫） 2:6 4:21　132:17 133:13　定义 72:5\n创建\n72:23 157:6　100:4 103:9　141:5 142:5,21,23　101:5\n已创建\n86:13　日　39:9 44:24　143:5,12,15 144:3　程度　17:7 18:16\n133:22　45:14,16 46:24　145:18 147:2　45:13 179:5\n141:19,20\n创建者　47:8 51:13,14,15　148:13 150:14,18　18:19\n学位\n债权人\n42:15　52:4,4 63:16　152:24 155:15　Delaware（特拉华州）\n176:14\n47:14 81:5,13,16　132:18 155:17　156:6,23 167:6　14:19\n\n延迟\n债权人的 2:13 5:8　169:21 182:22,23　168:5,25 169:19　部门 19:22\n165:17　185:2 186:19　171:16 172:2,14　19:22 20:7 22:2\n债权人 20:19,19　188:19　172:19 174:12,19　64:23\n21:9 67:2 86:16　14:25 72:11\n\n天数　178:14 180:11,14　取决于 52:11\n86:23 171:6　75:12,19,21 82:17　180:16,24 181:4　视乎 42:8\n\n危机\n52:7　82:21 83:22 92:23　183:3 184:11　51:23 78:24 79:4\n138:8\n\n交叉　145:4 183:22,24　债务人的 38:23　158:19\n交叉核对　截止日期 81:10,13　47:25 48:18 49:2　取决于 78:18\n136:22　交易\n80:6　58:9,11,13 62:4,18　168:12 171:25\n\n累计 69:7　167:22,23,24\n\n债务　63:4 74:20 79:8　债务人    1:7 5:5　描绘 136:24\n134:17,18　16:9,13,15,20,23　106:15 108:10,19　证言 1:14\n\n好奇\n88:14　20:11 21:5,6　108:22 111:16　3:12,17,23 6:22,25\n88:17\n当前　25:16,22 36:15　123:20 141:23　7:6 10:16,24\n118:20　37:11,20,25 38:3,9　144:10 164:9　11:22 13:4,21\n目前 18:21　38:22 39:15 42:16　166:9,19 167:15　14:23 15:7,17\n88:7 122:9 134:16　45:13 52:14,25　171:20 172:16　16:5,10,11 27:25\n171:21　54:19,25 57:10,10　175:19 187:8　28:20 41:12 45:23\n\n周期\n155:6,10　57:12 58:16 62:15　债务人 20:18 42:4　49:21 137:20\nD　70:22,22 76:6,8,12　48:6　187:5\nD\n81:14 109:22　76:21 77:3 78:19　12月 74:24　证言 40:14\n128:3 186:2　79:23,25 80:4　77:7 161:18　42:9\n\n存款\n187:17　82:8 84:12,14　决定\n103:10　58:20 155:8\n\n日期\n1:10,16 10:18　88:23 94:4 101:8　决定 37:12　描述 70:14\n32:19 35:13 44:20　101:11,16 108:16　39:12 87:14　103:21 104:10\n111:18 113:18　102:13 141:4　128:5 136:2\n48:4 67:19,20\n71:4 75:12 86:3　114:3 115:15,21　声明 62:19　142:10 169:25\n87:20 93:15 111:9　116:5,6,10,12　已声明 40:18　描述\n114:7\n129:12 131:17　117:7 118:5,14,16　可扣除的\n78:2　138:11 187:4\n137:15 139:25　118:24 120:15,16　79:2,7\n\n[描述 - 到期]\n\n描述　70:16,25 91:6,8　106:10,21 126:11　109:7,12 129:5,8\n\n136:10　92:11,15　139:13 143:13　182:25\n\n指定\n12:2,7　直接\n29:10,16　155:22 165:10　狗\n103:13\n指定　105:20 130:2　讨论\n43:13　狗\n89:12\n165:23,25　指示\n28:10　43:15 106:5　正在做\n7:18 22:18\n\n细节\n145:8　88:23 182:3　113:11 137:21　51:8 60:2 61:19\n160:19,23　直接地\n104:15　驳回\n70:12　61:21 78:17 88:17\n\n详细\n27:15　143:11　差异\n164:8　91:16 157:17\n160:10,13　董事\n51:4,4　已显示\n161:4　162:13 176:6\n\n细节\n135:24　不同意\n81:17,19　争议\n28:3 29:19　182:13\n163:6,18　170:3,4　29:20 130:6　司法部\n161:10\n\n确定　已支付\n155:16　不同的\n74:5,14　美元\n154:14\n38:5 39:3,12　支付\n62:9　分配\n136:8　美元\n96:5\n87:17 101:10　72:5 117:17　136:14 138:13　125:15 126:8\n137:5　支付款项　分配款项　132:21,22 133:23\n\n确定\n87:13　52:17 54:4,15,16　139:6　133:24 146:20\n156:3　54:24 63:16,20　地区\n1:2 3:20　154:12 159:16,16\n\n已确定\n72:25　67:2 68:22 73:2　划分\n141:13　159:18 164:12\n\n确定　77:14 86:19 91:14　部门\n1:3 3:21　177:2 183:24,25\n178:15　91:15 92:15 137:8　案卷\n48:10　双重\n73:2\n\n发展\n67:5　157:10 184:16　93:19 97:7 100:20　110:18 134:23\n\n已发展\n183:20　免责声明　111:6 131:24　怀疑\n114:20\n\n正在发展\n87:24　111:15　文件\n10:20　草案\n88:7 98:14\n\n发展\n86:7　披露\n46:21　32:14,15 33:3　107:23 114:19,20\n\n差异\n38:8　83:9,16　35:9,16 48:6,12,15　126:13 130:15\n41:23 108:6　已披露\n84:6　48:23,24 55:12　136:17 140:24\n\n不同\n41:21　161:4,5　93:18,21 94:11　141:16 142:15\n42:18 51:22 52:2　披露\n29:7　96:25 100:20　起草\n31:19\n77:21 80:5 108:2　118:22 182:14　101:19 105:19　43:11,16 112:25\n108:3,16 144:18　披露\n68:25　107:21 109:4　起草人\n138:17\n\n不同的\n51:22　证据开示\n40:13　111:5,11 112:9,21　起草\n31:22\n\nDiFilippo（迪菲利波）\n2:22 4:2　谨慎\n89:4　127:18 128:25　46:2,5 98:13\n\n数字\n110:15,15　讨论\n8:13　131:24,25 135:10　103:10 105:22\n\n数字化\n120:19　147:19　140:9 141:21　112:11 124:5\n\n勤勉\n179:8　已讨论\n85:23　146:10 147:16,19　草案\n32:4 62:21\n\n下跌\n14:9 28:24　94:5 98:20 106:19　147:21 154:22　驾驶\n161:24\n54:20 61:22 62:14　127:15 130:4　155:3　172:13,14\n63:19,23 64:2,4,10　143:7　文件\n13:9　下降\n41:10\n64:16 65:3,11,15　讨论\n132:3　13:13,16,17,23　到期\n44:23 45:7\n65:19,22,24 66:3,6　讨论\n11:17　27:22 57:8,15,16　55:3 69:11 70:19\n66:15 68:2,20　15:24 99:15　57:20 105:11　75:7 81:22 179:8\n\n[会费 - 精确地]\n\n会费\n107:10　实施\n63:20　聘用 23:5　61:2\n\n实质上\n\n5:22 186:5\n正式地　91:14　23:7 24:2,10,19　158:14\n188:10　高效　53:8　25:6 26:4,11　确立　62:2\n职责　41:20 43:2　高效地　52:5　30:12,14 31:16,22　81:21 156:17\n43:20,21 50:24　八\n166:3　32:5 34:9 36:5,9　已确立　74:13\n55:691:25 93:4　任一　42:17 81:5　40:5 43:12 44:2　遗产　42:20 53:4\ne　101:9 103:16　45:2 46:3,5 50:15　54:21 62:25 68:25\n104:22 110:17　51:25 52:2 55:15　70:24 73:17 74:3\n2:2,2 5:21 6:5\n\ne　经过\n39:11　55:16 84:15,19　74:14.14.18.21.23\n13:11,23 14:2,4　选择　74:25 75:2,13　171:10 180:2　74:23 76:9,10,14\n15:20 26:9,13,13　75:18　业务活动　77:20,24 78:19\n27:9,10 30:19　选举\n19:18　166:17 177:16　79:24 80:4,7,8,10\n32:17 34:3 35:11　电力\n107:11　英语　127:13　81:23 83:3 94:22\n35:19 37:18 38:6　电子的\n15:19　174:21　107:6 113:19,22\n39:7.9 41:17　电子产品\n100:24　确保　73:12　114:4 147:6 157:2\n49:22 59:11 81:14　119:17　136:23　175:9,11 181:10\n99:19 104:23,24　消除\n131:13　全部　79:14,14,18　遗产的\n87:25\n106:9 112:24　150:21　完全地\n79:6　遗产\n74:4\n117:5 129:9,10,15　已消除\n150:20　138:23 139:6　估计\n105:21\n129:17,24 130:11　150:22　157:10 172:9　预计　71:13\n131:15 132:22　强调地　42:3\n实体　106:12\n139:23 141:2　181:2 183:7　179:19　估计数\n73:11\n147:9 151:13　实证的　154:9　题为　1:16 48:6　估算　73:7\n152:9 155:16,25　雇用　14:8 38:21　实体　74:5 103:15　97:14\n等等\n160:18 162:19　48:8,19 49:3　114:24 119:25　120:5\n163:8 169:4　90:11,17 168:6　126:22 154:14　114:13\n评估\n173:15 180:8,10　受雇　18:21　183:10,10 184:4　68:2\n事件\n180:19,22 181:21　36:15 37:11,20　条目　148:7,16　103:21\n事件\n181:25 182:2,4　38:9,11,16 90:14　公平的　113:15　104:10\n186:2 187:2,6,7,11　91:25　125:23\n错误的　所有人　60:21\n187:12,13,14,17　28:17\n雇员　159:11　75:9 93:7 156:8\n188:2,2　雇员　28:22　错误地\n125:5　175:18\n较早　68:10 94:5　29:2,5 42:5,23　125:14　所有人的　45:2\n100:7　50:20 182:11　110:22\n错误　69:8\n容易\n73:2　雇佣　38:14　161:7 184:13　每个人的　46:2\n编辑\n135:15,16\n140:23　89:7,8　136:4\n错误　147:3 162:15\n努力　124:10　托管　91:7,20,21　证据　87:11\n受过教育的　155:22　结束　183:23　91:22,24　确切地　53:7 58:9\n教育\n17:18　从事　20:11,15　Esq.（律师）　2:5,6,6,10,15　115:4 117:4\n教育的　17:3　20:16 24:23 166:6　2:19　130:22 159:13\n有效地\n38:4　179:10　181:25\n\n[询问 - 文件]\n\n询问\n5:25　预期　27:21\n暴露　恐惧　28:5,6\n\n100:2 103:4　106:22　范围\n22:12 60:5　可行性\n86:8\n153:10 154:16　预期　33:5,13　65:4 78:3 83:8　87:3,7,9\n165:14 185:9　123:20　113:6 137:12　可行的\n87:16\n187:18 188:9,11　136:18\n费用　143:17,18 146:23　2月　45:8\n审查过　5:24　1:8　100:21\n额外的　63:14 69:3 72:9,9\n101:3\n例如　费用\n71:13　110:15 162:10　77:6 122:22 125:4\n109:3 163:20\nExcel　72:4 77:15,17,18　f　129:22 132:17\n169:2\n超额　78:23,25 79:7　133:11,12,25\n交易所　181:25　105:22 106:12,16　81:14 109:17,18\nﺎ　134:3 140:14,14\n160:4\n排除　106:23,23 107:2,3　188:2　152:22,23 154:21\n不包括 -\n125:21　107:9,15 108:10　fa\n41:19　154:21 155:10,11\n原谅　11:10　108:15,20,23　102:24\n面临　156:15,17 159:9,9\n51:14 123:16　117:6 123:2　事实\n115:25 182:21　159:19,23 160:7\n126:12 137:22　124:11 129:22　15:24 60:5\n事实　联邦　11:2 19:17\n153:14 174:23　130:9 133:5,15　99:10,13 113:9　19:18 73:17 76:12\n证物　7:7 10:14　134:10 136:24　114:8 146:15　79:14.16,18\n10:17 32:14,18,21　140:13 147:7　147:4　73:13 123:3\n费用\n35:8,12 41:6 43:6　148:7,16 149:17　事实上　150:15　157:7,8,9\n47:24 48:3 91:4　149:24 152:21　42:25 53:16\n公平　感觉　48:11 67:3\n93:12,14 111:4,8　183:4,11,12,22　59:20,23 60:22　感觉　41:18\n128:24 129:11　184:5　72:16 78:15 84:21　142:2 178:22\n131:7,16,21　经验　7:21　88:24 94:19 96:9　费用　33:18 53:9\n133:16 134:7　20:24,25 64:4,7　97:19 103:20　54:24 62:6 68:2\n135:11,14,18　82:3 164:4,6　104:6 106:13　69:8,11 70:21\n136:18 139:24　177:16　130:13 134:20　72:24 77:18,25\n140:7 141:17　专家　22:19,19　136:21 145:12　156:4,24 163:3\n142:15 144:14　40:11,19 41:2　160:9　175:4,8\n147:10,15 159:7　91:12 165:20　44:8\n相当公平地　感觉到　132:24\n182:6 187:3,3,5,6　166:16　熟悉的　7:23　受托人　20:17\n187:7,8,9,10,11,12　专业知识\n166:6,17　12:10 89:21　数字　136:5\n187:13,14　到期\n69:15　家庭　19:15 58:8\n103:13 118:9　155:19\n证物\n187:3,15　36:24\n解释　129:8 132:16　认为　160:23\n存在过\n101:23　41:22 70:2 82:13　162:16\n179:12　108:5 132:8 148:6　143:18\n远　文件　29:5 38:15,20\n存在　57:7　150:8 159:12　6:21 67:14　40:11 52:25 53:3\n143:17　已解释　37:15　171:21 173:12　74:8,16 75:6 76:6\n存在\n172:7　解释　139:17\n快　76:11,11,16 77:23\n预期　51:7,19　144:15　父亲　118:18　78:14 81:5,7,16,20\n175:16　明确的　66:2　143:20　89:6 137:22\n过错　73:8　163:11 175:21\n\n[提交 - Francis（弗朗西斯）]\n\n提交　3:19 13:9　179:6,18　62:23 87:13\n流动　112:22 113:24\n\n28:24 42:7,8,9　4:8\n在财务上　流动的\n104:20　118:4 122:18\n45:3 48:10 49:7　87:16　13:7 30:18\nFlynn（弗林）　125:3,14,16 126:3\n55:22 62:19 63:14　融资　14:10　45:6,16 49:15,16　127:7 130:16\n68:12 69:23 75:8　28:25 54:20　50:5 56:4,24　132:11 133:18,22\n75:24 76:5 84:4　查找　40:10 117:25　112:17 129:18,19　134:15 135:3\n93:19 100:10　156:18　149:15,19 150:2　141:18 148:20\n111:5 122:22　完成\n8:19　150:24 151:11,14　149:7 152:11\n125:4,14,18　已完成　54:11　181:18　156:13 157:20\n131:24 135:3　公司\n4:3,5 21:24　Flynn的　46:10 50:7　166:12,22 170:12\n160:21 161:23　22:13 24:16 39:18　151:8　170:22 177:25\n167:4 168:16　40:3,25 51:5　44:20\n专注于　187:9\n181:12　52:15 56:2,15　聚焦\n46:6　表格　98:16\n文件\n80:10　112:15 139:14,14　108:18　提出\n101:7 112:13\n提交　32:24 61:11　156:2 172:13　各位　15:15 25:6　188:10\n63:12 73:23 75:12　176:9　29:24 30:10,14　向前　63:17\n82:17 92:23 96:9　公司\n62:7 134:7　49:14.24 129:21　68:17 69:6 75:14\n96:12 98:23　第一　5:22 16:18　遵循\n164:18　108:13 134:19\n113:23 132:3,6,18　19:3 21:23 43:16　以下　44:25,25　157:4 163:3\n138:2　43:22 44:6,9,21,24　148:7,15　133:22\n发现\n提交文件　56:7 73:18　45:14,25 46:24　如下　5:24　145:3 146:14,18\n最终　62:22 87:17　47:8 51:13,14,14　食物\n119:3　150:15,17 182:24\n133:15,24 135:17　51:15 55:17,18　傻瓜\n178:19　四　15:12 19:2,3\n135:21 136:3　69:23 73:9 75:19　186:8\n前述　19:23 21:18 82:23\n137:24 140:12,20　89:3 93:25 94:14　可预见的　124:22　161:22 165:25\n140:22 141:4　105:3 112:3　102:19\n忘记　Foxboro（福克斯伯勒）　6:9\n144:8 159:8　122:21 129:23　11:10\n忘了　框架\n34:25\n183:21,21　130:25 139:10　形式　22:16 34:10　118:23 146:23\n最后　46:13　149:14 161:13,14　37:16 39:5 54:5　154:5\n162:16　162:3 180:9 186:5　57:22 58:18 62:10　Francis（弗朗西斯）　25:18,23\n财务　61:12　适合　89:13　64:14 66:13 72:6　26:2,10 30:2,6,7\n63:12,15　恰当的　101:4　72:21 77:4 78:21　31:4,8 32:9 56:17\n财务的　14:5 21:4　五　39:10 128:2　80:25,25 81:2,3　57:3 59:3,5,18\n21:6 22:15 34:7　128:15 141:8　84:25 88:3 91:9　99:2,7 102:11,20\n36:23 37:6 39:8　161:22　92:2 93:5,13 94:2　102:21 103:17\n修正　94:21 95:9 96:10　104:12,15 105:4\n48:9,20 49:4 54:6　口味　17:15　98:13,14,15,19　105:14 106:7\n55:20 62:4,5　2:4\n楼层　102:8 103:24　109:25 112:15\n64:22 111:17　流动\n61:10 62:13　104:13 106:18　124:2 129:19\n112:5 166:10,19　62:13 69:21 86:18　108:21 109:15　135:23 139:8\n168:3 178:14　110:20 111:22　143:13 148:4,12\n\n[Francis（弗朗西斯） - Hampshire（汉普郡）]\n\n152:9,13 156:3　一般\n88:21　上帝\n47:14　黄金　2:17 5:16\n\n157:16 180:9,18　100:15 155:8　去　7:18 43:19　26:18 27:17,18\n坦率地　33:12　163:9　79:5 101:6 124:18　28:7,10,14,17,23\n150:12　通常　13:25　156:22　29:6 57:23 58:3\n欺诈性的　82:10　18:24 21:19 22:8　正在去　3:3 10:13　179:6,9,12,24\n82:20 171:18　24:2 25:5 36:24　32:12 35:7,8　180:5,6,7,10,15,20\n48:11\n自由　44:12 50:24 55:2　36:14 37:5,10,19　181:16,20 182:9\n频繁地　39:20　55:14 57:4 66:3　37:24 39:15 40:8　182:15,19,19\n40:2,5 42:15　66:23 70:2 73:8　40:10,10 41:9　183:4,8 184:6\n64:25 73:5　74:24 80:23 82:14　44:9 45:5,20 47:3　Goldman（戈德曼）　2:15 5:6\n前面　15:9 44:18　90:12 109:10　47:23 52:3,12,22　5:6 6:20 7:10 27:3\n162:23 180:23　110:10 115:6　53:7,13 54:2,3,7,8　28:4 29:8 85:14\n燃料\n163:24　49:23\n获得　54:9 59:2 68:17　164:17,23,24\n完整\n19:8 73:10　86:23 135:20　68:18,19,21 69:5,6　165:15,16 184:22\n完全地\n12:20　137:21 176:4.8　69:24 70:19 73:23　185:3 187:21\n功能　87:24　179:21　76:8,18,19 77:6,9　高尔夫　123:4\n基金　2:4 4:20 6:14　120:21\nGETTR（盖特）　78:22,23 80:5,15　好　3:2 6:10 44:8\n10:24　10:6 14:25\n给予　85:8,14 87:2,3　165:16\n资金　127:23　147:24 152:20　89:5 91:18 92:20　货物　100:25\n128:17 184:5　153:2 161:6　92:23 93:8,11　119:16,19\n资金　70:17　164:25　96:24 106:24　毕业\n18:18,19\n108:12 130:23　已给予　105:14　107:12,18 108:13　毕业于　17:4,6\n138:12 155:16　131:22 134:25　111:3 115:4　无偿的　37:7,8\n175:23　182:11 185:6　118:22 123:9,10　164:8\n伟大的\n陈设　186:10 188:12　123:13,23 124:12　Greenwich（格林尼治）　113:20\n100:25　75:11\n给予　124:13,14,17　123:9,14 150:13\n进一步\n163:5　眼镜\n11:11　128:23 129:15,23　152:16 153:16,24\n184:23 186:8　14:6,7\n全球的　131:19 134:19　集团　26:14 113:3\n188:13　51:10,11 111:7,14　139:15,16 143:6　143:7 144:8 153:8\n未来　69:23 78:4　111:24 187:10　147:14 149:2　120:20\nGTV\n78:5,8,12,20 85:3　去　3:14 7:22 11:12　151:22 155:18,18　猜测　15:8,12 19:3\n86:19 87:13　28:2 38:12,13　155:19,20 156:15　77:5 127:2,3,6\n124:22 157:18　40:13 44:17 53:6　156:16,18 157:22　149:8\ng　54:19 90:18　157:22,24 158:2,6　猜测\n66:8\n5:21　103:25 107:5　158:12,21,23　指导\n161:6\ng　111:23 114:4　159:3 161:5 163:3　170:24\n家伙\n垃圾　61:3,3,5,6　122:3,20 124:18　163:14 168:21　h\n107:12\n燃气　139:15,16,19　169:16,18 170:25\n汽油\n117:9　144:7 156:21,22　171:5,11 175:10　23:16 187:2\nh\n一半　93:7\n收集　29:4　164:21 176:25　175:23,25 177:8\n123:17　183:20　181:9　Hampshire（汉普郡）\n176:16\n176:24\n\n[手 - 增加]\n\n手　27:24 32:12　174:15　希望\n148:25　116:25 117:18\n\n34:22 47:23 93:11　听证\n46:15　149:3 175:6 177:8　118:9 123:2,5\n110:9 111:3　21:13　医院　122:4　173:13\n117:21 128:23　热\n107:11　59:12\n热的　立即地　44:25\n130:22 131:20　1:17 3:23\n持有　酒店\n114:17　9:25\n损害\n146:7 188:19　11:17 23:2 165:10　15:13\n小时　重要的　8:18\n递交　147:14　帮助　24:13 46:7　小时\n15:11,11　75:3 132:24 168:6\n发生　47:13 52:3　57:7 137:4　39:10 67:21　172:11 174:7\n52:12 69:3 89:12　有所帮助\n137:9　164:19 166:2　无意的　133:6\n89:13 162:17　有帮助的　14:14　房屋　101:25　134:6,22\n发生　80:3　38:25 137:4 138:8　149:17　无意中\n81:15 82:22　帮助　100:9　家庭　97:25　125:12 132:16\n178:11,12　169:11\n有助于　100:24 101:4,15　133:21 134:2\n骚扰　143:15　前述　102:5 119:16,19　不适当的\n骚扰　27:21　186:11 188:10　家务　29:9,16\n28:5,6　特此　188:18　144:20,23　包括　22:18\nHarbach（哈巴赫）　2:6 4:21　163:14,24\n有\n8:25　嗯\n4:21 23:12 41:13　高　17:3,5 19:10　人类　110:21　107:14 122:15\n59:13 85:16 99:20　19:24 94:14　百　64:9　包括在内　65:14\n99:25 100:3,5　Hill（希尔）　179:24 180:5　138:21 139:4　125:15 132:23\n103:2 147:24　雇用\n80:5　141:13 142:22　133:19 134:2,5,13\n152:5 153:11　90:5\n被雇用　143:6,24 144:2　134:23 137:14\n165:6 180:6　雇用\n40:25　146:20 168:15　150:25 151:25\n187:19,20　历史　17:3　丈夫\n141:12　159:11,17 160:11\n困难的　127:12　击中\n162:7　142:8 145:14　包括　19:6\nHaven（黑文）　2:18 116:2　击中\n73:7　i　61:23 62:12\n116:15　1:5 2:9 3:18 5:5\nHo（何）　想法　7:19 44:8　包括\n危险　15:8　11:6 94:4 111:18　67:23 90:17　40:14 61:11 70:24\nHCH　152:22　持有　18:11,18　126:24 151:20　86:7 115:16\n头部　8:24 155:4　36:14 37:10,19　身份证明　包括　125:24\n标题　11:22　持有　114:25　10:17 32:19 35:13　收入　52:25 53:3\n健康　121:18,22　家　6:7 107:8,9　48:3 93:15 111:9　53:5 62:15 63:5,9\n121:24 122:2,8　118:19,25　129:12 131:17　73:17,24 74:16,17\n听到　127:13　房主的　139:25 147:11　74:20 76:15,17,22\n171:14　154:10　已识别　7:12　77:8,11,12 78:8\n听到　45:24 82:21　房主　103:22 104:8　79:20 87:25 125:5\n104:15 127:15,17　107:7　134:7 181:23　125:16,21\n182:9　119:5 154:8\n房屋　身份　26:18　不正确的　125:18\n听证　45:17　诚实地　12:21　27:23 28:16 74:8　增加　141:8\n46:14 47:9 51:15　希望　64:3 100:22　想象　54:18　142:12,17 145:24\n123:18,19 127:18　159:4 171:2　61:25 66:22\n\n[增加 - 问题]\n\n增加\n142:14　139:7,12 145:2　122:2,8 146:4,12　调查过\n\n144:13　146:10 152:10　146:19 148:8,17　101:22 110:11,24\n增加\n141:10　153:3 155:13,14　150:3,4,11,12,16　调查\n40:7\n143:23 145:10　156:20 157:14　150:17 152:15　40:9,22 59:16\n发生\n142:6　158:20 174:4　153:24 154:7,10　63:8 95:7 97:22\n177:7　176:3 177:22　158:21,22　102:9 108:24\n独立的\n63:8　183:19,19 184:9　知识产权的\n120:7　115:6,18 119:14\n95:6 97:21 114:10　获知\n44:2　120:13,15,18　119:22 128:11\n119:13 122:5　99:13 103:16,18　意图\n171:24　157:18 158:9\n123:19 128:7　103:19 104:16　意图为\n32:25　179:15 183:15\n152:10　180:11　34:19 40:4,6 62:7　调查\n表明\n7:2　告知\n127:5　89:15 110:20　114:11\n表明\n135:12　初始的\n140:23　125:19　投资\n177:4\n137:18 152:6　141:20,21　互动\n16:23　177:6\n161:19 162:11　发起\n25:12　22:3　发票\n158:8\n个人\n21:8　输入\n43:21 59:6　互动\n146:17　涉及\n20:7\n24:15 41:2,19,23　72:22 114:22　互动\n15:2　31:21 49:15,17,20\n43:4 70:4 74:3,4,6　输入\n162:4　利益\n20:22　50:21 52:24 53:4\n74:15,15,16,17　询问\n153:23　53:11 77:20 80:3　55:24 56:6,20\n75:23 77:2,19　询问\n51:16　87:12 113:16　57:24 59:7 65:10\n164:4,11 183:23　询问\n161:9　119:10 120:7,18　65:18 90:9 100:8\n个人的\n27:20　163:16　121:16 147:5　101:13 105:22\n单独地\n79:24　内部人士\n82:19　感兴趣的\n4:9　109:6,9 132:4\n个人\n19:5　无偿还能力\n17:24　22:15 41:17 49:10　178:7 179:21\n42:19 57:8 85:5　18:5,6 19:4 21:24　151:3 178:4　参与\n115:9\n158:16　165:19 166:16　188:16　iPhone\n103:11\n行业\n60:17,21　实例\n62:3 89:9　利益\n101:11　不论\n70:19\n告知\n124:3　138:15　115:13　美国国税局\n76:19 89:10\n信息\n12:20　实例\n40:19　干扰\n3:11 10:5　IrvE\n2:15 5:6\n22:16 24:16 29:3　164:6　干扰\n3:9　164:24 165:16\n29:7 30:22,24　机构\n64:23　内部的\n25:6　岛\n176:15,21\n31:3,9,12 58:10　指示\n43:7,9　80:14　问题\n27:23 73:6\n59:6,16 69:24　指示\n26:21　内部地\n13:10　75:10 82:23\n85:7 94:4 98:11　26:23 27:12　口译员\n127:14　124:23,23 150:5\n99:11,17 104:11　指示\n29:10　相互关联的\n113:7　签发\n54:7\n105:3,7,12 110:6　教员\n18:5　中断\n41:8　问题\n18:3 27:24\n116:9 124:10,14　指示\n9:21　引入\n174:16　40:24 44:8 52:6\n124:16,20 127:5　不足的\n8:25　调查\n102:14　53:15 72:3 110:11\n133:2 135:2　保险\n69:14　105:17 110:25　147:20 174:6\n136:13 137:3,12　107:8 117:10　113:10 124:17　182:12\n137:19 138:3,7　121:17,18,22,24　168:19\n\n【项目—知道】\n\n项目 55:5 61:16,20　36:1 37:1 38:1　149:1 150:1 151:1　键盘录入\n98:19\n\n63:11,18 64:13　39:1 40:1 41:1　152:1 153:1 154:1　经键盘录入 98:16\n66:12 68:6,16　42:1 43:1 44:1　155:1 156:1 157:1　孩子们\n73:15,20 80:16,21　45:1 46:1 47:1,24　158:1 159:1 160:1　138:25\n82:7 83:6,19　48:1,2,11,25 49:1　161:1 162:1 163:1　种类 20:22 88:24\n84:11,24 85:18,22　50:1 51:1 52:1　164:1 165:1 166:1　116:17 118:17\n86:2,6 87:7,21　53:1 54:1 55:1　167:1 168:1 169:1　122:12 134:22\n88:15,20 89:19　56:1 57:1 58:1　170:1 171:1 172:1　188:4\n国王\n91:5 92:19 94:14　59:1 60:1 61:1　173:1 174:1 175:1　45:20 105:6\n知道\n94:15,16 95:4,7,23　62:1 63:1 64:1　176:1 177:1 178:1　113:9 178:16,18\n95:24 96:2 97:11　65:1 66:1 67:1　179:1 180:1 181:1　182:22\n97:13 103:11,12　68:1 69:1 70:1　182:1 183:1 184:1　知道 7:16 9:10\n103:13,14 104:2,2　71:1 72:1 73:1　185:1,7 186:15　22:4 30:12 31:7\n111:20 113:17　74:1 75:1 76:1　187:3　31:17 33:19 34:13\n127:22 142:14　77:1 78:1 79:1　1:6\n果酱　34:18 36:7 38:16\n144:12,20 146:12　80:1 81:1 82:1　一月\n161:18　38:16,22 39:13\n152:4　83:1 84:1 85:1　13:8 31:25\n10　41:4 43:18 47:3\n89:16 96:21\n项目　86:1 87:1 88:1　49:16 50:0 56:5　50:3 52:3,21,22\n97:24,24,25 98:7　89:1 90:1 91:1　56:24 112:17　53:9 57:23 58:2,3\n99:12 101:3,12,15　92:1 93:1,12,14,22　共同 86:13　58:12 60:4,9,25\n102:5,22 103:22　94:1 95:1 96:1　2:22\nJon（乔恩）　62:21 64:9 65:16\n107:13 119:16,18　97:1 98:1 99:1　Jonathan（乔纳森） 4:2　66:3,5,23,24 67:6\n119:23 121:8,11　100:1 101:1 102:1　法官 29:9,13　72:19,23 76:7,17\n132:7 136:19,25　103:1 104:1 105:1　87:16　77:7,10,12,13\n137:13 160:11　106:1 107:1 108:1　法官们 22:14　79:10,12,13 80:14\n163:6,19　109:1 110:1 111:1　判决书 37:22　83:23 84:5,10\nJ　111:4,8 112:1　102:4 136:15　86:14 89:9,11,20\n2:10,15 5:21 6:5　113:1 114:1 115:1　17:9\n六月　89:25 90:4 103:25\nJ\nJalbert（贾尔贝尔） 1:15 3:1,18　116:1 117:1 118:1　司法 64:23　104:3,4 107:10\n4:1 5:1 6:1,5,14　119:1 120:1 121:1　证明正当性\n148:15　109:19 111:24\n7:1 8:1 9:1 10:1　122:1 123:1 124:1　K　115:3 116:3,3,4,5\n10:14,16,19 11:1　125:1 126:1 127:1　保留 41:2 52:16　116:5,14,17 117:8\n12:11 13:1 14:1　128:1,24 129:1,11　59:14 107:12　117:8,10,20 118:7\n15:1 16:1 17:1　129:14 130:1　124:17　120:21 121:13\n18:1 19:1 20:1　131:1,16,20 132:1　保留 42:11　122:23,24 123:3\n21:1 22:1 23:1　133:1 134:1 135:1　Keith（基思） 20:6　125:8,13,20\n24:1 25:1 26:1　136:1 137:1 138:1　Ken（肯）\n9:17 13:6　126:20 127:12\n27:1 28:1 29:1　139:1,24 140:1,7　14:16,21,24　145:15 150:11\n30:1 31:1 32:1,13　141:1 142:1 143:1　Kenneth（肯尼斯） 2:10 5:3　151:18,21 152:2\n32:18 33:1 34:1　144:1 145:1 146:1　保留 7:17 162:10　152:13 154:7\n34:23 35:1,8,12　147:1,10,15 148:1　157:21 159:3,21\n\n【知道—LLP的】\n\n161:2,15 166:21　122:13 124:4\nLago（拉戈）　160:5\n合法的　清算\n171:5\n\n168:11 169:4,5,17　124:21　Lenaya（莱纳娅）    1:19 4:5　已清算 88:2\n170:13 171:7　灯 126:8,20　188:6,21　清单 7:17 53:6\n172:16,19 173:7　127:16,20 179:14　20:20 21:7\n贷款人　64:22 87:6 90:4\n173:20,25 175:5　179:15,24　冗长的\n58:24　107:4 154:4\n176:2 177:3,7　土地 113:16　信函 31:16,22　155:19,20 157:24\n179:11 181:8,9,11　语言 114:23　32:5 43:12 75:13　159:23 172:7\n181:22 182:5,12　大型的   30:20 59:8　76:3　173:4\n182:18,20,21　78:5　级别 53:12 72:25　已列出 12:3 72:19\n184:7,18　2:5 4:18\nAura（奥拉）　94:14 149:23　108:12 111:25\n知情地 29:4　6:12 103:3,6　该村种植农作物。该村人民的主要职业是农业。该村人民的主要职业是农业。\n级别　114:14 122:12\n知识 12:15　法律 22:13 39:18　负债 30:23　128:3\n12:19 41:3 59:9　112:15 134:7　94:3 111:17　倾听\n124:7\n62:17 63:3.4　律师 43:18 46:8　164:10,12　已倾听\n123:15\n91:10 102:10　86:20 102:17　责任 157:5,6　108:13\n列示\n121:15 122:7　113:25 138:20　生命\n169:23　160:23\n123:17,20,22　139:14 178:23　可能性\n82:4　诉讼\n19:6\n126:9 127:20　律师的\n40:7　限制 111:15　22:4,7,11,11 40:6\n128:7,21 133:20　律师们 22:20　有限的 5:17 90:7　77:9881:25 82:5\n140:12 152:10,20　25:12,14,16 39:21　163:9 178:17　85:19 88:2 127:23\n154:9 158:3　51:17 82:18 95:5　行   5:13 44:18,18　128:15,17 170:19\n172:21 174:18　96:23 102:7 110:8　61:15,20 63:11,18　170:25 175:14\n184:15　125:17 126:2　64:12 66:12 68:5　178:18\n47:14\n知道 128:6 132:24　68:16 73:15,19　小的\n14:19 16:25\nKwok（郭文贵）\n1:5 2:9 3:19　136:16 139:14　80:16,21 82:7　21:25 24:3 46:17\n5:5 11:6 25:21,24　150:20 155:23　83:6,19 84:11,24　89:12,12\n32:16 35:9 94:4　158:3 159:2　85:17,22 86:2,6　146:22 150:18\n居住\n102:6,23 103:14　170:18 172:22　87:7,21 88:15,20　生活\n118:15\n104:9 111:18　174:6　89:16,19 91:5　149:16,22\n119:24 122:16　牵头 51:5　92:19 94:14,16,22　生活的 114:8\n129:2 138:23　了解 30:5,7　95:3,7,13,15 96:2　129:22 133:15\n139:2 140:8 143:2　离开\n152:24,25　96:16,21 97:11　134:9 136:17\n147:17　离开 41:11　99:12 103:12,13　140:13 153:17\nKwok的\n30:3　102:7 144:4\n遗留　111:19 132:7　159:8 183:3,11,12\n119:10 145:17　法律的 2:22 101:8　136:19,25 137:13　184:5\n－　105:9 106:6　146:12 152:4　有限责任公司 2:12 75:24\n5:21 6:5 23:16\n－　113:15 114:7,25　159:14,15 163:6　126:21\n153:8　163:19　有限责任合伙企业 1:18 2:3,4,8\n186:2　依法地 76:2　行数 95:19 104:4　3:24\n缺乏\n63:5　168:14　126:18　有限责任合伙企业的\n10:24\n119:7,10\n女士\n\n【贷款—马萨诸塞州】\n\n贷款\n63:23 64:2　Lowey（洛伊）\n1:15 7:9　Lynch（林奇）\n1:19 4:5　主要的\n19:3 67:2\n\n65:11,15,19,22,25　10:25 13:24 15:16　188:6,21　89:15\n66:6,15 68:2　17:12 18:22,25　M　Makenzie（麦肯齐）\n2:6 4:24\n70:16　20:6,10,15 21:16　MacDonald（麦克唐纳）\n49:19　34:21 146:7\n贷款\n64:5,10 66:3　21:21 22:24 23:6　女佣\n118:8 145:4　作出\n73:11\n位于\n3:24 101:5　23:18,25 24:17　145:4 158:24　101:14 102:3\n113:19　25:7 26:3 30:13　女佣\n145:4　113:3 153:7\n地点\n123:21　31:15 36:8,18　邮件\n26:9,13,13　167:13 184:10,16\n旅馆\n101:17　37:3,24 38:21　30:19 32:17 34:3　经理\n50:8,13\n长的\n15:5 137:18　39:4,17 43:7 48:8　35:11,19 37:18　经理们\n50:16\n139:15 160:20　48:20 49:4,18　38:6 39:7,9 41:17　管理\n51:4\n165:22　50:2,15,20 56:19　70:16\n看\n31:25 35:15　57:2 58:15,21　104:24 106:9　普通话\n57:18\n40:8 48:11 82:16　59:15,25 61:15,19　129:9,10,15,17,24　174:20\n111:23 152:15　64:12 65:9,13　130:11 131:15　三月\n122:13 124:4\n174:7 178:13　66:10 67:13,24　139:23 141:2　124:21\n看过\n13:22 70:7　71:12,18 72:17　147:9 151:13　三月\n23:22 45:8\n133:16 136:14　73:19 76:10,25　152:9 160:18　72:10,10 73:6\n163:21 173:22,25　78:16 80:20 82:4　162:19 169:4　122:25 134:15\n174:8 181:21　83:5 84:17,22　173:15 180:10,19　137:22 155:17,18\n寻找\n14:3 22:14　85:25 87:20,23　181:25 182:2,4　156:16,18\n22:16 69:17　93:3 94:6,10 95:3　187:6,7,11,12,13　标记\n7:6 35:7\n136:17 142:15　96:20 97:10,16　187:14　邮件\n13:11,23　131:9\n154:22 162:20　98:6 99:5 100:8　14:2,4 15:20 27:9　已标记\n10:16\n172:4 175:18,23　101:13 102:3　27:10 49:22 59:11　32:13,18 35:12\n175:24　109:6,11 112:16　27:10 49:22 59:11　47:24 48:2 93:12\n看起来\n107:5 132:5　112:17,20 122:15　99:19 104:23\n松散的\n132:7　124:9 125:22　112:24 163:8\n180:8,22 181:21　93:14 111:4,8\n失去\n75:19　128:10 135:20　主要的\n2:13 25:2,3　128:24 129:11\n损失\n78:12　136:22 144:21　163:12　131:7,16,20\n许多\n42:10 47:11　149:11 163:17　缅因州\n176:17,23　139:24 140:7\n68:18 69:24　Lowey的\n12:15,22　维持\n17:25　147:10,15\n104:25 112:13,14　44:13 55:15 67:9　54:3 91:7 92:10　显著地\n41:20\n122:3 127:8　106:3 111:20　维持　标记\n10:13\n168:23,24 178:18　112:8 134:21　156:21　婚姻\n188:15\n许多\n99:13,14　135:16 140:23　已婚\n142:25\n106:21 113:10　有限合伙企业\n4:20　维持\n63:19\n64:16 91:5　Mary（玛丽）\n13:8 31:24\n167:19 169:21　午餐\n123:4　维护　49:16 56:4,24\n178:2,2　奢侈品\n115:16,23　107:8 144:22　112:17\nLow（低）\n53:12　116:13　马萨诸塞州\n6:9\n145:6 158:23　176:13,16,22\n\n【实现—每月】\n\n实现 52:7　会议 16:16,17　会见 6:11 16:13,18　Mitchell（米切尔） 25:17,20\n\n实现\n60:12　45:14,15 46:16,25　16:19 30:18 58:15　25:25 26:10 31:4\n150:19\n材料　47:13 51:15 69:5　125:15,16　31:8 32:9 56:18\nMatt（马特） 45:6,15 46:9　116:2 123:15　方法\n152:22　57:4 59:4,4,18\n49:15,15 50:4,7　126:13 127:10　方法论　99:3,8 102:11\n56:24 112:17　会议 46:19　111:15　103:17 104:12,16\n129:18,19 154:4　47:12　夹层\n167:23　105:4,13 106:7\n160:17 181:18　Melissa（梅利莎） 25:18,23　麦克风\n3:11　109:24 112:15\n事项 1:16 3:18　26:2,10 30:2,6　165:2　124:2 129:18\n6:23 20:8 41:9　31:4,8 32:9 56:16　麦克风 3:6　135:23 139:8\n43:8 46:4 49:17　56:17 57:3 59:3,4　中间\n113:14　143:14 156:3\n50:21 51:6 53:12　59:10,17 99:2,7　午夜 162:14　157:16 181:5\n67:13 76:5 81:25　102:11,18 103:17　百万 126:8　148:4\nMK\n90:9 115:25 129:2　104:11,15 105:4　154:13 164:12　时刻 62:24\n145:6 147:17　105:13 106:7　Miltenberger（米尔滕贝格） 2:19　153:12\n151:23 160:25　109:25 110:18　5:14,16 28:13,14　货币化\n120:24\n174:10 188:17　112:15 124:2　29:23 41:7,15　54:21\n金钱\n事项 7:2 14:2　129:19 135:23　Miltenberger的　62:14 78:4 134:18\n40:2 88:22 98:20　139:8 143:13　29:21　153:24 177:4\n13:7 56:4\nMatthew（马修）　148:3 152:12　心意 27:14 34:18　款项\n136:6\nMcDonald（麦克唐纳）\n15:18　156:2 157:16　34:24 36:20 87:5　监督\n92:14\n131:2\nMcKenzie（麦肯齐）　160:16 174:5　99:20 164:21　监督\n91:13\n膳食\n141:9,10　180:9,17 182:3　Mindy（明迪）\n50:5　72:15\n月份\n144:15　成员\n55:7　46:8\n矿山　118:21 161:7\n意思是 17:16 21:9　172:12　最低限度 32:8　184:2\n39:24 44:23 60:14　成员资格　67:7 77:14 128:6　每月 45:6\n83:12 86:8 87:9　122:13,17 124:5　161:7\n轻微的　46:11 51:12 67:8\n96:11 110:4　113:12\n记忆　分钟 11:13 33:3　68:7,11,18,23 69:7\n116:14 130:19　记忆 66:2,9　147:24　69:10,12 70:2,15\n138:14 149:2　115:22 127:8,9　14:20\n分钟　70:18 71:2,3,8,13\n175:14 177:19　141:20 159:17　89:11　72:3,20 105:21\n意味着 8:3 82:14　卑微的 170:2,7　琐事 89:14　106:12,16 107:14\n144:3 151:2　提及 14:15　误传达　107:22,25 108:20\n意思是 22:7 63:12　15:15 18:4 19:24　135:4　116:22 117:14,16\n159:12　22:23 24:11 25:23　遗漏 23:11　118:11 122:16,21\n媒体 3:16 120:19　29:25 49:14,19　缺失 32:2 81:9　123:7 124:6,11\n120:23,24　54:14 57:3,14　110:15　125:5,16 130:14\n调解 171:3　60:13 73:22 87:8　159:24\n错误　130:21 132:2,25\n药物 10:4　92:4 100:7 126:16　误解　134:9,24 135:10\n16:15 45:22\n会见　165:18　56:22　147:8 148:7,16,24\n72:5　149:3,24 151:25\n\n【每月—异议】\n\n154:20 155:12,15　116:4 138:10　115:25 116:15　136:12 141:17\n\n157:11,19 160:4,8　173:4,8,23 174:9　146:22 156:13　145:2 153:6\n160:24 161:11,16　182:6,14　173:18 176:14,16　158:15\n161:17,23 162:2　指定\n119:7　176:23 188:3,7　众多 44:5\n163:5,13,20 168:9　136:22\n姓名　14:22\n夜间　59:11 101:3\n169:7,11 184:19　107:12\n自然　78:7\nnol's　112:24\n月\n72:7　性质\n52:21　无意义的话 162:11　5:16\n纽约\n161:25 183:20　168:13 183:16　正常\n8:17 77:19　0\nmor 72:11 108:14　136:3\n几乎　179:3\n137:22　必然地 83:24　通常地 109:15　23:16 78:11\n\nmor's\n170:6　必要的 12:20　公证人 1:19 5:23　186:2\n上午 3:3 6:10　63:21 75:25 80:18　186:22 188:6　o'melveny 1:17\n14:20,22　85:18 93:2 100:23　注释 3:5 29:20　2:3 3:24 4:19,22\n抵押贷款 77:19　112:7 169:21　35:24 41:11　4:25 6:13 13:18\n母亲\n118:17　8:23 9:9\n需要　145:19　100:5 103:7\n动议\n14:9 28:25　36:14 37:11,20　记载 29:18　4:7 7:25\n宣誓\n38:15,20 89:7　40:12,15,23 42:10　14:6,7,7\n笔记　反对 129:25\n90:10,16 168:6　47:4 85:9 124:19　51:10,11 100:9,13　提出异议 30:20\n6:24\n动议　127:4 143:3 156:9　100:14,19 101:3　反对\n80:19\n181:12　163:14 166:20,23　111:7,14,24　12:4,24\n异议\n机动车 119:5　169:18 170:10,15　112:12 113:4　24:20 26:16 27:15\n摩托车　171:14　121:6 148:4　28:24 29:22 34:10\n115:17　需要的 30:22,25　187:10　37:16 39:5 57:22\n75:14\n提出动议　44:2 46:7 174:4　通知 6:22,25 7:5　58:18 61:4 64:14\n移动 34:24 57:2　需要 166:10,13　7:12 10:15,24　66:13 77:4 78:21\n42:22,22\n多重　167:6\n需要　89:10 187:5　79:22 81:10,12\n多个 19:14　169:19　通知 4:17　84:25 88:3,8 91:9\n42:4 76:4　协商达成\n31:14　十一月 127:24　92:2 93:5 95:9\n相乘\n136:7　31:15　数目 3:22 6:24　96:10 98:15 99:24\n乘以 183:25　谈判\n31:18　19:16 30:21 32:16　101:18 102:8\n音乐\n120:7,18　65:10　62:6 73:4 81:4,15　103:24 104:13\n1:18 2:3\nmyers　谈判 171:3　93:19 96:8 100:20　106:18 108:21\n3:24 4:19,22,25　两者均不\n58:14　110:19,20 132:22　111:22 112:22\n6:13　净额   19:10,24 78:11　133:16,20 134:19　113:24 118:4\nn　荷兰 114:17　135:13,18 146:20　122:18 126:3\n115:2　150:9,10 152:14　127:7 130:16\n2:278:11 186:2\nn　从不 57:6 121:23　159:14,15 181:21　132:11 133:18\n187:17　1:18,18,21 2:5\n新的　183:22 187:4　141:18 148:20\n姓名 4:2 6:3,11　2:5,10,10,18 3:25　编号 97:7　149:7 152:11\n20:5 23:12,13,15　3:25 5:23 58:8　数字 48:23　157:20 166:12,22\n23:16 27:20 28:22　79:15,16 115:8,10　97:5 135:21　170:12,22 177:25\n29:5 58:12 102:18\n[异议 - 段落]\n\n异议\n4:14　108:20,23 137:20　口头 65:18 99:17　7:8 11:8,21\n页\n\n12:8 14:10 52:20　170:24 178:18　99:18　33:2,4 48:22,23,24\n52:22 54:8　公开 47:13 91:7　口头地 106:9　49:9,11 55:13,18\n9:18\n反对者　92:10　160:18　88:20 93:25 95:18\n义务 91:22　开始 63:19　命令 29:15 62:11　96:4,25 97:4,8\n观察员 45:20　64:16 91:5　72:23 75:3,5,8　105:18,20 106:11\n取得\n12:19　经营 41:21　86:9,21 105:5　113:13,14 115:12\n取得 59:17　41:24,25 42:11,20　54:25\n命令　119:9,12,20 120:3\n22:15\n取得　42:21 43:3 45:7　通常地 172:5　121:3 124:25\n显然地 43:18　46:11 51:12 67:8　普通的 30:21　126:5,10 132:7\n66:18 87:17 98:17　68:7,11,19,23　62:7 70:24 156:7　140:19 145:20\n105:8 156:21　69:10,12 70:3,6,10　156:8 167:18　148:3 149:15\n163:15 173:21　70:15,18 71:2,4,8　169:22 181:7　151:14 152:8\n174:17\n场合　71:13 72:4,21　原始的\n150:10　157:6 161:19,20\n偶尔地　78:12 106:12,16　152:3 159:20　161:20 162:3\n141:22,24　107:22 108:2　153:13\n最初地　187:3,18\n113:19\n占用　116:22 117:14,16　4.9\n结果　页码 161:19,22\n113:22　118:11 122:16,22　188:16　162:11\n发生\n68:3　123:8 124:6　外部 16:22 26:3　已支付 32:24 70:23\n提议\n18:25　130:15,21 132:2　26:5,6,14 31:5　72:14 73:13 77:25\n办公室\n19:16 58:8　132:25 134:4,5,9　80:4 126:10　86:16 108:10,15\n68:24 69:20 72:12　134:24 135:11　127:17　118:22 130:24\n72:22 162:13　147:8 149:25　未清偿的 59:24　133:3 134:16\n办公室\n1:17　151:25 154:20　多付款　136:7 149:18\n官方的 93:13,25　155:12,15 156:10　160:6　151:15 152:21\n94:21 187:9　157:11,19 160:5,8　欠付 81:18,19,20　153:24 155:23\n抵销\n78:7　160:25 161:11,16　114:3\n拥有　156:11 158:8\n哦\n45:10 160:24　161:17,23 162:2　126:22,25 127:16　159:19 160:2,3\n167:9 173:2　163:5,13,20 168:9　154:8　173:6 175:4,8,10\n177:14　169:7,12 184:19　所有权\n102:12　175:19 179:24\n好的 9:7 35:17,22　业务运营 127:20　107:9　181:10,12 183:4,6\n71:17 85:17 96:3　意见 145:20　拥有 115:5 116:5　183:8,14\n103:2 131:11　151:5,7　p　122:14\n棕榈\n148:2 149:14　机会 2:4　2:2,2 23:16　平底锅\n101:23\n159:6 173:8 181:6　4:20 6:14 10:24　p\n69:20\np&l　文件 168:23\n169:3\n旧的　38:20 75:20 81:4　1:15 2:17　文件 43:17,19\n一旦 85:11 144:24　29:6\n反对　p.c.\np.m. 39:10 90:25　44:16 45:3 46:3,6\n154:10　被反对的 74:6　139:21 140:4　126:14\n一些 60:9 69:23　103:14　165:8,12 185:5,8　段落\n113:2\n持续进行的 52:6　相对的\n159:24　太平洋 2:3 4:19　113:2\n88:14 105:21　6:13 10:23\n[最重要的 - 计划]\n\n最重要的\n29:3　通过\n44:9 130:25　人员\n5:15 16:2　139:9,11,12\n\n地块\n111:25　139:10　19:8,17,19 28:19　140:24 157:17\n父母\n42:3　已通过\n105:7,8　45:22 53:4 58:24　178:20 179:3\n部分\n21:22 37:17　专利\n120:4,13　102:17 117:24　181:23,24 182:2\n43:17 51:11 69:9　pax\n100:6　118:7 141:24　183:9,10 184:4\n96:9,12,17 97:9,13　支付\n19:13 54:22　142:2,4 168:24　某人的\n27:23\n97:24 100:12　55:3 68:2 118:20　175:16　182:5\n105:20 111:25　154:9 171:6　百分比\n118:13　个人的\n95:12\n112:3 132:21　应付的\n69:21　138:19,21 139:4　97:25 101:4\n144:7 170:21　应付款\n167:24　141:9,11,13,14　102:10\n171:7,9 172:4　收款人\n138:11　142:7,8,9,12,16,23　亲自\n23:9\n181:6　收款人\n137:7　143:6,8 144:2,5,6　65:17\n参与\n47:2　支付\n107:17　144:13,14 145:11　视角\n31:23\n47:17 60:8,12　146:24　146:4,5,11,11,21　77:16 85:7\n参与\n51:13　付款\n33:17　百分比\n136:6　有关\n146:21\n58:23 84:3　92:22 106:23　136:8 138:13　申请书\n32:22\n参与　108:22 117:9　139:5 147:7　33:5,9,16,20 35:24\n45:21　133:3,25 134:11　百分比　36:3,8 74:13 84:6\n参与　146:19 154:7,13　136:15 144:19　92:22 132:19\n45:12 47:10,20　154:15 156:24　履行\n59:15　133:3,3,25 160:2,2\n特定的\n40:5,12　159:17 175:13　66:11 91:25 93:3　160:3,3 172:5,20\n40:16 42:19 105:5　179:4　96:20 97:10,16,21　174:25 176:5,8\n117:17 118:6,23　付款\n83:22　98:5,6 114:13　177:18,24 183:4\n130:17 168:25　84:6 86:16 93:2　125:22　183:11,14,16\n尤其\n14:9　132:16,19 133:7,9　已履行\n80:20　184:5,12\n112:12　133:10 134:2,6,16　83:5 88:10 89:18　电话\n15:3 25:11\n当事人\n3:14 66:22　134:22 154:5　97:20 121:10,14　25:15 28:8 47:20\n84:23 87:12　156:25 157:24　期间\n72:10　58:24 59:2,11\n104:25 105:2　172:5 183:17,17　82:16 86:20 90:25　104:24 143:15\n117:6 130:24　184:11　117:18 129:22　167:8 181:19\n133:12 188:14　工资单\n42:7　133:11 140:13　电话\n3:10\n合伙人\n19:12　支付\n122:4　151:15 153:25　措辞\n110:2\n20:3 51:3　pc\n10:25 48:9,20　154:20 155:11,17　身体上地\n123:5\n合伙关系\n74:10　49:4　156:12 157:25　挑选\n3:7\n75:23　pdf\n95:18　159:9　地点\n3:10,14\n部分\n79:12　pearl\n2:18　伪证\n8:8　45:22 47:15 53:8\n当事人\n4:7 20:22　处罚\n8:8　人员\n5:12,15　77:6 82:20 83:25\n44:4 53:10 99:11　未决期间\n70:9　15:18,21 26:15,17　175:24 186:11\n102:14 119:24　117:19　49:20 50:17 51:5　计划\n86:6,11,13,24\n122:6 173:12　未决\n9:11　54:4 103:15　87:15,24 122:2\n184:10　81:25 82:5　129:18 130:10,10　169:17\n\n[计划中的 - 程序]\n\n计划中的 54:19　120:17　准备\n13:4　此前 6:10\n\n86:14 88:7\n计划　可能地\n118:4　24:13,14 71:11,12　14:23 85:20\n125:3　169:6 171:17　71:23 95:3 100:9　104:10 119:18\n平台\n120:8　邮寄 20:17 32:22　173:5　130:4\n120:20　33:5,9,16,20 35:24　已准备 13:10,14　主要的\n143:10\n播放   52:10 169:18　36:3,8 61:11　24:15 31:19 71:3　本金 21:17\n169:20 171:7　63:12 133:3 160:2　71:19 86:12　22:24 23:3 37:23\n172:2,3,3　174:25 176:5,8　161:15 173:18　50:5,10,16,25 51:8\n播放 52:11　177:18,24 183:11　183:12　印刷的 119:11\n诉状 14:8　184:5,12　准备人 135:4,6　先前的   82:17 83:23\n请\n3:5,9 4:15　已张贴 120:8,19　136:9 173:4 174:9　优先权\n81:7\n5:10,19 6:3 8:19　潜在的 24:10　准备 8:12　29:2\n隐私\n9:5,11 11:8 23:14　52:9 65:11,15,22　15:6 45:6,11,12　私人的\n3:7\n28:11 33:2 35:15　85:21　46:14 55:24 56:7　特权 39:23,25\n67:22 148:5,14　潜在地 27:20　57:24 58:21 60:23　40:17 83:15\n165:2　66:678:17 90:14　66:20,21 84:4　享有特权的 41:3\n加上   72:10 106:7,7　101:23\npots　86:18 94:7,11　14:24\n可能\n135:18 140:17　执业 121:21　105:11 109:6　20:20 24:11 28:9\n2:14\npo　执业人员　110:12 112:9,21　32:9 42:10 45:4\npohl 23:10,15,17　176:13　132:4 155:3,6　52:15,16,19 54:5\n23:24 24:4　前   74:13 84:6　161:2169:11　106:8,8,9 110:17\n要点 39:14 40:18　92:22 132:19　170:5,6　116:23 137:8\n48:14 52:20 60:6　133:3,25 160:2,3,3　出席 120:25　138:21 144:5\n61:8 65:25 67:10　172:5,20 177:18　目前 2:21 4:10　170:23 176:19\n75:3 81:11 92:20　177:24 183:4,14　提出 155:13　问题 80:3\n106:17 123:23　183:16　总统的\n19:19　146:25 160:24\n124:13 130:14　前身\n17:11　推定地\n54:22　162:16\n153:22 166:3　以……为前提的 72:3　68:20　11:3\n程序\n171:10　157:10　推定 114:6　17:19\n要点 25:2 55:17　预测 53:7,13　预设　程序\n7:23\n政策 121:17　33:15\n偏好　55:10　70:13\n政策 121:18,22　优先 33:9　预设 70:15　进行 11:20\n121:24 122:8　33:14 82:10,18　预设　140:5 165:13\n居住 95:23　84:2 171:18　66:14　程序\n转运 49:23　偏好 82:16　相当 21:11 22:9　16:22\n37:2\n提出　准备 13:20　32:7 37:4 44:22　诉讼程序 39:19\n占有 37:25　15:7 51:9 53:5　70:5 179:11　39:21,22 115:10\n38:3 52:14　55:19 56:20 60:19　此前的 36:21　程序 38:14\n可能的 30:17,25　61:9 68:6 73:16　38:6 78:7,10　40:13 67:21 155:9\n31:635:25 60:7　86:7 112:4 116:22　116:8 119:6　168:7,22 169:23\n79:6 82:9 84:12　168:10　178:11\n\n[出示 - 推理]\n\n出示\n8:13　152:16 153:16,25　d　r\n\n已出示 128:25　主张者 118:12　31:23\nqpc　r   2:2 5:21,21 6:5\n137:19 147:16　拟议的 5:4,7　季度   72:8 73:9　48:25 186:2 188:2\n173:12,13,16　54:20 111:20　73:10　167:8 176:10\nrang\n产品 46:22　139:3 150:21　季度的 68:7　15:13\n范围\n83:15,17　保护 75:9 89:16　71:19,21,25 72:18　29:5\n等级\n职业\n166:3　179:4　查询 158:18　很少地 42:21 81:18\n专业的 17:14　受保护的\n29:14　问题    8:20 9:5　比率 67:10,11\n17:17,25 18:8,12　保护 83:18　9:7,11,19,20 27:4　达成 23:17,24\n33:11 37:22 77:17　保护性的 29:15　27:6 28:9 34:8,12　28:20 161:12\n92:21 156:4 158:3　证明 86:22　34:16,18,19 36:17　162:12,25\n163:3 166:7　提供 22:18　36:19,25 38:17　达到 161:13\n175:19,20　92:25 171:11,15　53:17 56:9 83:20　阅读 27:6 34:12\n14:8\n专业人员　已提供 13:14　94:19,21 96:17　57:18 65:24 90:16\n30:21 54:9,23　59:5 98:11 99:10　101:12 105:16　120:16 147:25\n57:9 62:8 68:25　117:3 130:9　108:3,8 110:7,8　阅读 55:18 61:8\n77:25 156:5,5,6,7　140:24 158:15　113:14 114:14　63:18 80:17 88:20\n156:8 157:2,3　92:21\n提供者　115:13 116:21　94:20,24 95:11\n159:25 175:20　提供 27:14　117:4 118:3 119:4　105:21 106:12\n181:8　63:21　120:3,12 121:16　113:18 115:15\n概况\n166:10,19　公众 1:20 5:23　122:11 124:13　准备好 137:21\n178:14 179:6,18　186:22 188:6　126:5 127:22　真实的 42:20 77:20\n项目 69:12　拉取 134:14　130:18,20 148:19　94:22 107:6\n70:11　pullman 2:12 5:7　149:6,12,25 150:3　113:19,22 114:2,4\n71:9\n进展　165:17　151:19,23 154:2　147:6 167:20\n进展 50:22　打孔\n99:11　155:16 163:10,12　实现 159:24\n预测 61:10　惩罚性的\n164:9　163:12 166:14　确实 31:2 74:21\n61:24,24 86:18　117:12\n购买　177:13,21 181:15　133:2 165:4\n87:10　118:19　184:10,12　10:8 76:15\n理由\n显著的 60:18　117:13\n已购买　问题 47:17　78:13 89:4 138:22\n承诺 179:23　目的\n39:23,25　83:21 91:3 99:21　142:4,19 143:4,10\n促使 163:17　77:24　100:6,23 113:5　145:16\n证据   80:24 81:2　依据 10:25　119:19,21 129:16　合理的 21:13\n81:21　推动\n168:23　135:25 149:2　合理性\n证据 80:19　放置 44:18 69:16　153:5 158:5　109:14 110:3\n适当地 136:2　131:12 142:7　164:15 167:17　158:10\n财产 94:15,21　155:24　179:17 184:8,23　合理地 53:11\n95:12 107:7　87:18\n放置　165:4\n迅速　推理 29:21\n113:17 114:2　放置 109:14　quickbooks 60:25　142:17 143:21\n120:7,13,15,18　180:22　迅速地\nI રેતે:R　144:8,11 145:10\n122:11 148:5,14　145:12,21\n\n[理由 - 报告]\n\n理由\n75:2 77:23　记录\n3:3,15 4:13　提及\n84:11 95:13　依赖\n85:5 104:9\n\n130:3 142:11　6:4,11,11 8:12　95:17 96:2 114:16　177:15 178:6\n168:15　11:13,15,16,20　119:4 120:5,12　救济\n75:4,6\n回忆\n23:20 32:6　28:2,18 32:15　121:4,17 122:13　依赖\n84:22\n33:8 34:7 44:10　41:10 48:5 90:19　125:8 126:6,7　依赖\n39:2 98:13\n57:21 65:20　90:21 91:2 93:18　127:23 135:13　123:25 139:6\n126:17 128:4　100:4 129:5 130:4　144:20　158:14 176:4\n146:10,13 151:4　139:19,21 140:4　反映\n132:10　177:23 179:5\n151:10 161:9　156:9 165:4,8,9,12　133:8 140:22　仍然\n106:16,24\n173:22　185:2,5 188:11　所反映\n133:14　107:18\n收据\n78:13　记录在案\n1:14　135:15 152:8　仍然存在\n74:12\n收据\n52:17　3:17　反映\n164:5　184:14\n54:3,14,15 63:15　记录\n3:13　唤起记忆\n36:16　记得\n21:14\n66:25 68:22 86:19　8:10　关于\n15:17　24:7 43:14,24\n应收\n69:22　记录\n15:9,20,23　16:4,4 24:2,9 25:5　59:2 62:22 81:3\n接收\n57:15　40:14 49:22 52:16　26:4,11 30:14　85:24 87:5 105:2\n137:10 157:15　82:9 84:12,14,18　59:21 65:14,19　105:5,15 108:7\n174:24　92:19 160:22　67:25 102:15　109:20 110:8\n已收到\n33:20　171:16,20 172:17　111:16 137:13　116:19 117:4\n92:22 99:17　可追回\n83:2　150:3 161:10　127:19 130:22\n104:11 137:13　追回款项\n175:15　163:4　142:13 146:16\n139:7 140:6　纠正\n135:5　遗憾\n168:2　159:13 167:12\n160:10　经删节\n129:17　重新加入\n41:14　173:10 176:7\n接收\n33:9　182:6,16,25　相关\n4:7 19:7　提醒\n167:10\n161:9　删节\n130:6　49:21 56:9 61:10　远程地\n4:11\n休庭\n90:22　提及\n97:4,25　90:3 91:4 95:14　承租人\n107:7\n139:22　被提及\n68:10　138:23 143:5,11　重组\n认可\n10:20　103:11,12,13　188:14　86:11 168:21\n48:15 49:6 93:21　119:23 155:5　涉及\n7:3,8 94:15　169:15\n111:11 140:9　159:10,15　107:16 111:21　修理\n107:8\n147:20,22　提及\n63:11　173:16　144:22\n回忆\n36:16　113:4,7 119:6　有关\n6:23　修理\n158:22\n44:21 162:24　提及\n65:7　70:14　重复\n9:5 27:3\n建议\n73:23　转介\n27:5　关系　重复\n66:17\n73:24 74:2 75:7　174:5　143:19　报告\n40:11 45:7\n75:17,22 76:11　提及\n71:15　相关性\n28:21　46:11 51:12 54:6\n80:9 141:10　95:20 97:4,7,14　88:11　67:8 68:11,19,23\n建议　104:3 120:9　相关\n27:24　69:7,10,13 70:3,6\n144:21　132:12 135:9　41:4 113:23　70:10,15,19 71:2,4\n核对\n80:18　150:6 167:16　116:21 117:14　71:9,19,21,25 72:4\n123:11　72:18,21 107:22\n\n[报告 - 权利]\n\n108:2,2,9 117:5,15　陈述　回应\n52:4　55:13 61:8 88:12\n\n118:11 122:16,22　59:21　149:15　111:21 126:14\n123:8 124:6　代表人　答复\n35:23　175:22\n130:15,21 132:3　180:5　115:14　已检索\n31:8,12\n132:25 134:4,6,24　代理\n9:12　答复\n12:7　返回\n53:2,3\n135:11 144:9　20:21 21:10,12　职责　74:23 75:6,8\n147:8 149:25　102:22 113:12　21:20 46:10,18　76:12,14 77:2,22\n151:25 154:20　代表\n9:16　负责\n20:2　77:23 78:14 79:15\n155:12,15 156:10　100:5 181:13　98:12　79:17,18 86:23\n157:12,23,23　请求\n26:19　回应性的\n124:15　168:9 173:5\n158:13 159:8,20　108:9 163:18　其余\n17:24　返回\n54:10 74:3\n160:5,8,25 161:11　要求\n47:9 60:7　限制\n153:2　74:9 75:24 76:5,6\n161:16,17 163:5　所要求\n12:14,19　洗手间\n139:17　78:18 79:9,11\n163:13 184:20　17:19,22 54:25　重组　80:10 169:9 173:3\n已报告\n71:2　55:2 70:10 76:2　167:22　173:6,11,18\n157:5 160:7　89:5 108:14　经重组　披露\n26:18\n报告人\n1:20 4:4　要求\n67:7　170:16,21　披露\n27:19\n5:10,19 8:11　要求　重组　28:22\n10:13,18 27:7　42:24,24 67:5　17:24 18:7 165:19　收入\n80:14\n32:12,20 35:7,14　要求\n68:24　166:11,13,16,20　审查\n27:22\n47:23 48:4 78:9　86:25 89:10　166:24 167:7,16　43:22 51:23 52:19\n93:11,16 111:3,10　居住\n150:15　167:21 170:11,21　53:10 60:7 61:9\n128:23 129:13　172:17　恢复\n139:23　62:12 68:6 72:17\n131:18,19 140:2　住所\n101:5,9　保留\n48:8,19　73:16 124:20\n147:12,14 171:13　102:5 113:16　49:3 181:7　125:17 135:24\n187:15　114:6,9 118:6,10　已保留\n34:6　150:19 158:2\n报告\n19:18　150:13　36:22 37:6 39:7　162:5 171:19\n42:23 52:18 54:2　住所\n19:14　39:15,18,20 72:17　已审查\n13:8,11\n66:21 67:4 68:8　114:14 118:3　143:11 187:15　62:18,20 81:24\n108:14 148:24　居民\n76:12　预付金\n32:22,24　84:13,18 109:13\n149:3 155:6,10　居住\n114:5　32:25 33:5,10,12　110:3 112:24\n报告\n22:19　118:5　33:16,20 35:24　114:21 141:3\n66:21 68:7 107:22　关于\n21:20　36:4,8 126:6　审查\n80:17\n116:22 117:16　92:25 95:7　174:25 175:17　82:8 112:11\n157:19 161:23　回应\n89:11　176:5,8 177:19,24　160:15 171:16\n162:3 168:9 169:7　178:24,24　保留\n34:5　修订\n139:5\n169:12　已回应\n36:20　35:21 36:18 37:3　罗德岛\n176:15,21\n代表\n30:2　65:4　39:4　权利\n7:10 10:19\n129:7 140:16　回应\n35:18　保留\n74:7 162:6　38:19 53:24 55:22\n144:13 176:17,19　51:16　保留\n7:8　61:3 62:16 63:6\n43:16,17,19 44:16　64:16 70:17 71:6\n\n[权利 - 服务器]\n\n73:4 81:15 84:9　178:7 181:3,5　124:25 128:3　142:20,24 143:3,5\n\n90:7 94:8 95:21　Rudnick（鲁德尼克）的 126:14　135:5,7,9 136:10　143:10,23 159:14\n98:2 100:11　10:25 11:22\n规则　155:25　184:3\n126:19 130:11　11:21 17:5\n规则　已安排\n81:14　11:23 28:21\n见\n134:12 136:19　161:3　日程\n14:6　33:6 35:25 45:22\n138:5 152:5　裁定 29:12　30:23 44:22 45:25　57:19 61:12 68:8\n153:17,20 154:22　22:25 8:9\n运行　51:10 55:20,25　82:11,25 88:11\n165:20 169:16　67:10,11 178:21　56:14 57:12,17,25　95:17 96:6 121:8\n170:8 173:23　运行中 21:23　58:17,22 60:20,24　121:19 125:6\n177:14　172:9,10　69:4 100:10　132:15 141:2\n权利\n29:2　178:22\n运行　111:16 112:2,5　148:9 151:16\n113:20\n道路　2:6 4:24,24\nRusso（鲁索）　113:6 168:8　155:21 159:2,3\nRodeo（罗迪欧）\n89:3　S　183:13　168:5 183:20\n角色\n50:7,12 52:9　2:27 4:10 187:2　Schindler（辛德勒） 13:8　看见 57:21\n53:18 94:6,10　S　31:25 49:16 50:9　127:19\n98:11 102:3　安全\n123:10　56:5,24 112:18　124:10,12\n寻求\n105:25 106:3　安全\n138:24　学校 17:3,5　79:8,12\n已看见\n112:9 134:21　144:10 182:11　科学\n17:7　109:15 121:23\n168:11 169:17,20　42:7\n销售　范围 43:8 44:12　127:24 128:19\n171:25 172:4　理智 158:9　90:13 171:9　137:6 145:7 164:8\n角色 23:2 51:18　162:4\n保存　164:22\n苏格兰威士忌　164:13\n157:4\n滚动　62:22 79:13\nSAW　仓促处理 69:4　选择 75:20\n已滚动\n158:15　79:15 126:13　71:11\n划痕　122:6\n出售\n4:11 127:12\n房间　128:4 153:4　99:16 106:2　语义 39:13\nRudnick（鲁德尼克） 2:8 5:4　159:23 162:19　搜查\n15:19,20　19:19\n参议员\n15:21 23:10,16　163:13 173:3　49:21 82:25　15:21 24:15\n发送\n24:6,8,18 25:9　陈述 37:9 149:20\n149:21 162:13　第二 45:16 61:7　162:7\n26:5,6,11 30:9　114:16 121:6　意义 38:2 158:4\n31:20 32:4 38:10　33:4 34:15\n称\n87:7 91:23 116:6　125:2　158:25\n38:12 39:2,16　秘密\n106:21　敏感\n3:6\n43:23 49:24 56:13　116:7 162:7,15　120:14\n秘密　已发送 13:17 31:20\n57:4 58:25 59:7　184:9,10　部分\n75:5 97:17　49:24\n59:10,17 64:20　害怕 143:16,18\n143:19　105:23 106:4　121:6\n判决\n83:18 98:25 99:7　20:14　114:19　125:2\n102:12,18 103:18　情景\n59:22\n日程　保障 167:22　单独 74:4,5,14\n103:18 104:11,17　60:3 71:14 81:14　已保障 20:19　74:22 107:21\n104:17 105:7,13　21:7 42:15 81:7　129:5 131:7 132:7\n106:6 109:24　94:7,20,23 95:12　安全 33:17　九月 17:10\n112:14 124:2　96:13 98:23 103:9\n103:23 104:8　115:24 118:8,25　7:5\n已送达\n126:7 139:7 156:2　133:23 138:16,22　13:24 49:22\n服务器\n157:15 175:18　108:12 109:16,17　138:24 142:14,18\n109:18 114:2\n\n[送达 - 开始]\n\n送达\n92:21　签名\n188:21　某一天\n169:17　花费\n21:23\n\n138:11 145:5,5　签署人\n37:24 52:14　某人的\n171:4　分开\n118:18\n服务\n18:24　65:3　某处\n110:21　说话\n13:5,7 14:15\n21:21 85:21 90:4　重大\n13:9　儿子\n58:9,11,13　14:21 16:8 31:2\n设定\n101:7 161:8　59:5　很快\n159:4　57:6\n188:10,19　显著地　抱歉\n3:5 7:14　已说\n14:24\n设定\n47:5 83:17　160:14　23:11 35:3 41:7　174:11,18,22\n和解\n78:6　Silverberg（西尔弗伯格）\n13:6　83:11 94:19 95:16　配偶\n118:14\n171:2　24:5 33:4 34:4　126:4 130:19　145:18 150:14\n和解\n77:10　37:2 38:5 39:6　171:13 176:11　配偶的\n121:18\n七\n75:15　Silverberg（西尔弗伯格）的\n35:19　种类\n52:8 55:6　传播\n21:25\n136:18　类似\n113:17　种类\n17:15 42:23　电子表格\n第七\n92:19　同时　54:15 167:25　135:14 158:6\n摇晃\n8:24　44:23　声音\n84:9　160:19\n形状\n62:10　单一\n53:10 75:22　来源\n62:24　春季\n2:17 5:16\n形状\n42:2　先生\n85:16 100:6,14　77:12 87:25 105:2　27:17,18 28:17,23\nShea（谢伊）\n2:17　153:18　175:7,8,13,25　29:6 57:24 58:3\n表\n69:20 131:14　坐着\n19:25　抹刀\n101:22　179:6,9,12 180:6,7\n133:15 138:16　情况\n104:20　说话\n14:18 15:14　180:10,15,20\n158:12　121:23　23:25 24:9,17　181:17,20 182:20\n表\n109:4　六\n162:10　25:5,10 26:2　183:5,8 184:6\nSherry（谢里）\n114:17,25　大小\n42:2　44:17 144:25　Spring（斯普林）的\n28:8\n146:21,25 150:5　滑落\n87:4　174:20,21 181:24　182:10,15,19\n150:16,17 151:16　小\n45:12 88:5　说话\n35:20　Springs（斯普林斯）\n26:19\n153:20 154:11　134:17 173:17　115:7,14 151:10　28:10,14\nSherry（谢里）的\n146:25　社交\n120:23,24　具体\n14:7 51:11　广场\n1:18 2:4,9\n狗屎\n176:11　沙发\n55:25 56:14　94:17 100:12,14　3:25\n短\n104:20　57:12,17,24 58:16　100:19 101:2　ss\n188:4\n139:22　58:22 59:22 60:2　104:4 110:24　刺伤\n43:22\n速记\n1:20　94:7 98:23 109:16　111:19 112:12,20　工作人员\n20:4 24:12\n显示\n146:9　沙发的\n14:5 44:21　157:25　51:17 52:8,9,24\n显示\n141:24　45:25 51:10 60:19　具体地\n20:25　53:14,17,20 54:4,7\n159:22　60:19,23 69:4　43:15 51:7 72:20　66:20\n显示\n101:19　83:22 112:2 113:5　细节\n83:10,16　盖章\n129:2\n已显示\n132:21　168:8 170:5　指定\n186:11　已盖章\n35:9\n147:7　软件\n60:16,18　推测\n127:4　标准\n70:8\n显示\n117:20　61:2,5　推测\n93:6　121:21\n158:5,21,23　唯一\n52:14　拼写\n23:12,13　开始\n6:17 7:22\n兄弟姐妹\n42:4　仅\n104:9　花费\n15:5 78:4　79:25\n签署人\n38:23　某人\n183:7　165:25　已开始\n17:11 23:4\n66:18　45:6 153:4,7\n\n[开始 - 团队]\n\n162:18 182:21　删除\n29:14　支持\n36:21　77:6 82:20 111:23\n\n开始\n33:14　罢工\n25:4 30:6　支持\n51:17　134:17 139:18\n83:25 97:9 109:5　116:20 157:13　支持\n60:18　165:3 173:2\n130:14　结构化\n65:23　应当\n74:20　179:25 184:25\n开始\n96:17　66:7　162:17 167:12　已取得\n79:4 90:23\n109:21　存根\n72:9　确定\n7:4,11,23　139:23\n州\n1:20 4:12,15　东西\n30:25 168:7　27:16 31:24 32:2　采取\n47:15\n5:23 6:3 27:2　主题\n8:7 12:11　32:7 37:4 38:12　谈话\n7:20 8:18 17:2\n42:22 73:17 76:16　14:2 29:14 53:10　38:13 43:13,21　80:7 146:3\n76:16 79:14 101:3　147:23　44:19 73:4 75:10　谈过\n16:3 21:18\n156:5 188:3,7　认购\n186:18　81:8 88:13 99:22　30:10,15 46:2,9,13\n陈述\n26:17　实质上　104:6 110:13,14　55:14 59:9 127:9\n164:10 171:19　149:5　110:16 113:3,8,11　128:12,16 129:20\n陈述\n14:5　减去\n133:6　124:8 125:25　134:10 137:24\n34:12 37:21 54:6　成功\n82:5　127:14 129:6　154:25 158:16\n55:19 73:6 111:17　成功\n86:10　135:25 136:10　164:3\n112:4 158:8　遭受\n9:24　137:16 141:5　谈话\n29:25\n陈述\n8:25　充分\n42:12　150:25 158:4,11　64:15 79:23 85:2\n69:19 111:14　建议\n143:6　165:6 167:13　96:12 98:25 103:8\n州\n1:2 3:19　暗示\n142:12　173:25 174:23　104:4 138:19\n42:6 54:23 62:5　142:17　176:7 179:11　146:13 160:16,16\n69:11,19 71:20　建议\n145:24　惊讶\n83:24　160:17 162:18\n72:2,22 157:7　建议\n141:3　周围　任务\n89:4\n162:8 171:11　141:8　182:12　任务\n88:22 170:2\n176:19　套房\n2:18 6:8　怀疑\n170:25　170:7\n统计的\n94:3　总和\n72:11 96:17　宣誓\n5:10,19　税\n19:21,22 52:25\n法规\n75:16　135:17　宣誓\n8:4　53:3,4 54:8,9\n82:22　概述　已宣誓\n5:22 186:5　73:17 74:3,8 75:6\n法规\n75:16　155:24　186:18 188:10　75:7,24 76:14\n法定地\n72:24　摘要\n94:2　系统\n60:10　77:2,16,22,24 78:3\n停留\n18:2 123:9,13　129:21 130:9　t　78:17 79:9,11\n停留\n123:8　153:3　t\n5:21 6:5 186:2　80:8,10 168:9\n步骤\n13:19 46:2　太阳\n59:14　187:2 188:2,2　169:9 173:3,5,6,11\n69:25　补充　制表符\n10:12 32:11　173:18\n迈步\n49:13　132:24　34:22 131:2 146:7　征税\n19:9 22:2\nSteven（史蒂文）\n23:9,15,24　支持\n19:6 22:4　表\n49:9,10 50:4　税款\n42:7,7 53:5\n24:4　22:8 40:6 49:2　Taconic（塔科尼克）\n113:20　73:24 74:17 77:20\n街道\n2:13,18 6:8　51:24,24 55:21　尾部\n45:4　107:6\nStretto（斯特雷托）\n89:22 90:8　85:19 112:6　采取\n3:13 9:10　征税\n75:11\n90:14 92:5,10,14　162:21 172:8　14:25 31:25 33:3　团队\n55:7 56:20\n92:24　35:15 53:8 67:5　59:10 106:6,6\n\n[团队 - 顶部]\n\n109:24 110:16　事情 19:17 64:19　172:11 173:16,17　44:24 45:19 52:20\n\n138:19,20 153:13　66:3 79:13 117:23　177:12 178:16,16　60:6 65:25 81:11\n172:9,12　120:10 122:14　178:17 179:3　86:17,20 90:20,24\n技术性的 56:9　124:21 135:12　181:19 182:22　97:3 104:21 106:8\n技术上\n74:22　157:2 162:15　183:21 184:20　116:13 117:18\n技术 169:6　事情 6:21 22:5　思考 40:8　118:23 123:24\n电话会议　51:21 54:18 69:14　117:7 123:12　136:13 137:11\n2:19　100:24 124:4　149:9　138:2 139:20\n电话 45:15　156:22 161:2　第三 63:18 64:15　140:3 146:23\n告知\n124:19,24　167:19 179:2　117:6 119:24　154:5 155:20\n127:3 135:8　认为 9:14 14:11　122:6 130:24　156:14,22 157:11\n154:14 184:15　14:12 16:17 18:15　133:12 184:10　157:25 159:25\n告知 118:21　19:8 20:20 21:9　184:2\n三分之 160:14,15,21\n7:17 15:11\n十　24:13 28:25 30:16　认为 37:12　162:6 165:7,11\n85:3,3,4\n时态　30:20 31:2,5 34:6　38:18 46:25 56:21　174:2,10 178:25\n87:4 125:13\n期限　34:11 36:13,19,22　95:14 114:2　179:12 186:10\n作证 5:24 6:15　37:5,10 39:7,13,21　126:15 127:15　80:10 145:9\n及时\n88:9　40:9 43:9 45:10　138:20 142:7　次数\n1:18 2:4,9\n作证 10:2,9 12:2　45:24 47:19 49:13　153:9,13 161:21　3:25 6:18 7:15\n12:14,21 40:15　51:3 52:12 55:4　174:6 175:12　14:24 60:14\n41:2 186:5　56:10 60:8,17,20　想法\n151:3　104:23 177:11\n正在作证 7:25　70:6 73:22 76:20　千 126:6　时机 78:24 79:5\n\n11:5 28:16　79:18 81:10,22　132:21,22 140:17　134:25\n证言 10:6　85:19 87:8 90:5　146:19 152:7　Timothy（蒂莫西）   2:19 5:15\n22:19 185:6 186:6　91:18 94:5 95:13　154:12 159:16,16　标题 21:15 86:12\n186:10 188:12　103:9 106:20,24　159:18 166:2　101:8 114:25\n第\n70:24　106:25 109:16,18　177:2 183:24,25　今天   7:25 8:13\n感谢 7:13 12:9　110:2,10,23 113:3　受到威胁 143:16　9:13 10:10 11:5\n14:14 19:20 29:23　115:23 118:12　三 19:27 2:7　15:4 159:5\n35:2 38:7,25 41:5　119:17 123:9　75:16 109:23　今天的\n13:21\n41:13 45:24 56:25　124:21 125:17　112:16 161:25　185:6\n90:19 94:24 96:14　126:11,13,15　163:10　告知 63:6 102:10\n99:25 102:21　128:3,5 137:24　137:17\n联系　104:17 143:17\n103:2,3 113:13　139:3 140:6,15　直到\n17:9 153:4　147:3 153:19\n119:2,4 128:19　141:19,25 144:7　15:18 28:13\nTim（蒂姆）　181:2 182:14\n133:4 144:12　146:6,18,25 151:2　41:13 49:19　184:21\n159:6 161:8　152:4 153:8,14　时间 1:11,174:16　今晚 85:13\n感谢\n41:16　154:18,24 155:5　11:14,18 15:9　顶部   14:13 18:2\n144:18\n主题　159:7,10 161:12　16:18,19 17:13　33:4 41:18 48:23\n55:21\n与此有关　163:2 167:7　19:8 21:12,23　97:5,8 130:10\n112:6　168:20 170:6,18　24:22 40:18 43:16　151:13 155:4\n\n（主题—使用）\n\n主题\n12:2　70:11 72:6,12,22　134:6 141:13,23　47:7 63:22 65:21\n\n主题\n11:22 12:15　73:13 162:8,12　155:14 159:25　76:21 90:13 92:9\n12:22　176:18　161:19,19 179:18　92:13 107:18\n总计\n94:22 95:12　真实性\n186:5　181:19 183:25　108:19 113:21\n96:5 132:10 133:5　真实的\n8:5 10:6　184:2　115:20 119:9\n133:6,23,24 136:9　如实地\n10:2,9　类型\n17:15,20　121:3 141:15\n完全地\n29:9,15　尝试\n8:20 15:22　68:14 122:14　147:4 149:10,11\n42:18　61:25 149:8 161:5　148:8,17　149:13,19 180:25\n大楼\n3:25　171:5　类型\n22:5 51:22　182:17 183:2\n跟踪\n124:17　尝试\n14:11 21:9　53:15 77:15,18　明白\n9:3\n贸易\n120:14　45:9 48:14 132:15　通常\n43:20　88:6 89:17 100:16\n商标\n120:4　135:23,25 136:5　69:13 86:15 131:9　133:4 145:8\n120:14　162:14 163:10　154:9 166:5　未披露的\n139:9\n交易\n126:9　170:14 174:2　U　139:11,12\n交易性　TurboTax（报税软件）\n60:23　美国\n72:6,12 73:13　未听闻\n176:24\n80:12　轮到\n3:9 11:8,21　161:10 162:12　单位\n3:16\n交易\n80:9　33:2 68:5 96:24　呃\n8:25　美国\n1:2 3:19\n82:9,25 84:13　105:18 137:23　最终\n150:22　54:23 62:5 69:11\n171:17　转向\n20:24 23:5　联合国\n42:7,8,9　69:19 71:20 72:2\n笔录\n8:14　29:24 34:3 35:23　不清楚\n47:2　72:22 157:7 162:8\n186:9,9　37:18 41:5 43:6　发现\n40:22　宇宙\n154:6\n转让\n82:10　48:22 49:9 50:4　已发现\n40:23　未履行\n42:9\n152:22 171:18　55:12 61:7 73:15　表现不佳的　未知的\n130:10\n转让\n82:20　80:16 82:7 85:17　19:5　140:24 157:17\n已翻译\n57:8,14　86:5 88:19,19　理解\n7:24　未支付的\n156:13\n57:16,19　91:4 92:18 95:11　8:3,15,21 9:2,4,7　未登记的\n旅行\n123:2,21　103:7 106:11　9:15,20,22 11:25　120:6,17\n143:3　109:3 113:13　12:13,18 25:19　无关的\n14:22\n旅行\n115:24　115:12 120:3　27:11 34:11,13,16　无担保的\n167:23\n对待\n77:21　124:25 126:5　34:17 40:16 58:7　已更新\n137:17\n尝试过\n59:13 134:25　130:8 132:6　81:17 86:21　维护\n107:9\n136:11　140:11 148:3　112:19 115:7　已上传\n109:17\n卡车\n97:14　149:14 151:13　129:14 147:18　109:20\n真实\n157:2 172:15　159:7　148:11 150:5　不间断电源\n164:18\n186:9 188:11　轮次\n144:24　153:5 158:11　使用\n53:11 64:24\n受托人\n54:23　Twitter（推特）\n120:20　166:14 169:2　113:18,22 115:15\n69:11 71:20 72:2　两\n14:24 15:11　170:17 175:10　116:6,10 117:3,7\n157:7 163:17　15:12 50:16 62:20　177:20　117:22,24 119:7\n176:21,22　77:15 82:23 87:18　理解　122:19 139:17\n受托人\n20:16　90:7 92:8 129:5　11:4 27:18 28:11　158:24 162:4\n62:6 68:24 69:19　132:18 133:10　32:23 37:15 38:8　169:5\n\n（使用—证人）\n\n60:17 115:21\n使用　55:15 56:19,23　165:7,11 184:25　104:19,21 117:25\n\n通常 69:15,16　57:2 58:15,21　185:4　134:15 141:17\n81:12 83:25 86:25　59:15,25 61:14,18　视频 120:8,19　156:23 162:2\n87:11,18 117:17　64:11 65:9,13　36:25 107:2\n观点　188:16\n134:15 154:11　66:10 67:9,12,15　148:18 149:6　77:22\n方式\n公用事业\n144:12　67:24 71:12,18　166:10,19,23　我们已经 16:3 20:16\nV　72:17 73:18 76:10　170:10　20:20 21:4,10,10\nV&L（V&L） 56:3　76:25 78:16 80:20　实际上 74:19　22:13 30:10,15\n82:3 83:4 84:17　169:8 176:18,20　44:20 45:10 55:14\n88:12\nV&L 的　84:22 85:25 87:19　118:16 142:5\n访问　67:14 85:8 94:5\n有价值的\n116:3　87:23 89:18 93:3　访问\n118:9　128:12 129:20\n估值\n121:10　94:6,10 95:3　自愿提出\n184:8　132:3 134:10\n121:13　96:20 97:10,15　W　154:18,21 158:16\n价值\n67:15　98:5 99:5 100:8　162:16 163:20\n102:24 120:22　101:13 102:3　等待\n8:19　164:3\n121:7,19,22,25　106:2 107:23　步行\n55:16 94:13　19:13\n富有的\n122:3,5　109:5,11 111:20　走过\n110:16　162:8\n网站\n货车 97:14　112:8,16,17,20　98:4\n步行　星期三 16:17\n各种 18:2 20:3　122:15 124:9　141 · 7　45:17 116:2,16\n42:2 5:6 51:16　125:22 128:10　1:5 2:9 3:18\nWan（万）　123:16,18 126:12\n54:22 57:9 58:24　134:21 135:15,19　5:5 11:6 94:4　174:15 182:23\n59:6 69:22 75:11　136:22 140:23　111:18　周 42:13\n118:24 120:8,13　144:21 149:11　16:25 40:21\n想要　66:24\n每周\n120:19 183:13　163:17　40:22 44:17 45:18　欢迎 41:14\n车辆 115:23,24　Verdolino's（韦尔多利诺餐厅） 130:14　55:16 66:23 75:21　去了 17:5,8 31:5\n117:13,22,23　59:16 138:3\n核实　94:13 104:2　43:24 45:19\n车辆 115:14,21　Veritext（Veritext 法律解决方案公司） 4:3,5　105:18 107:5,12　122:23,24,25\n116:9,13 117:2,8　Vermont（佛蒙特州） 176:17　146:3 147:19　123:5 174:7\n118:25　79:16\n版本　149:8 168:18　17:4\n西部\nVerdolino（韦尔多利诺）   1:15 7:9　127:13 133:15　172:3　任何\n10:25 12:14,22　137:17,24 140:12　想要 45:21　123:22\n13:24 15:16 17:12　105:10 110:14　据此 188:18\n18:22,25 19:25　140:20,22 150:10\n对 38:9 41:24　144:7 163:22\n20:10,15 21:15,20　119:24　想要 69:20 172:2　低声说话 3:7\n妻子 138:25\n22:24 23:6,18,25　172:3\n24:17 25:7 26:3　视频 1:14 3:13,17　Washington（华盛顿） 6:8　141:13 142:8,24\n30:11,13 31:15　录像员 2:22　水 34:24　145:14\n36:7,18 37:3,23　3:2 4:4 5:9,18　船只 97:15　愿意 64:20\n38:21 39:4,17　8:10 11:14,18　119:5　67:18,20\n正在进行的工作\n43:7 44:13 48:8　34:23 35:4 90:20　水印\n162:6　电线\n152:21\n48:20 49:4,14,18　90:24 139:20　方式 47:21 54:19　证人 5:11,20,22\n49:25 50:15,20　140:3 164:25　62:10 67:3 75:14　26:21 27:8 28:15\n\n（证人—零）\n\n29:10,11,16 35:3　91:3\n结束　Z\n\n46:21 59:12 78:11　96:8\n结束 67:14 79:20\n零\n83:8 85:10 116:12　书写 36:13 41:18　82:21 94:24\n130:2 131:4,12　177:10　106:13,16,24\n148:2 164:20　34:4 39:6\n书写 107:19 108:20,23\n167:9 176:11　书面材料 113:9　146:4,11\n185:9 188:9,12,18　书面的 8:12 65:18\n词\nરતેઃડો　119:8 121:2\n词语\n27:9　126:10\n工作\n17:8 19:9,11　错误的 73:5 162:13\n22:19 40:4 42:10　170:24\n43:8 44:13 46:22　写道 37:5 181:25\n54:5,8,9 56:12,13　182:4\n57:17 58:20 59:24　X\n61:14,18 64:11\n66:4,11 67:21　1:3,8 187:2,17\nX\n68:14 70:14 73:3　Y\n73:18 76:24 78:15　游艇\n119:7\n80:19 83:14,15,17　是的\n59:13 170:13\n84:2 86:2 88:10　172:25\n88:14,17 89:17　年 42:13 74:11\n90:2,3,13 97:10,16　74:12 75:15,16\n97:20 98:6 109:10　82:23 154:10,13\n112:14,20 121:11　年 7:17 17:13\n125:23 135:19　18:3 20:21 82:23\n154:19,25 167:24　82:24 166:3,4\n169:22 176:20　169:3 176:7\n177:2 178:2,5　36:2 95:22\n是的\n工作过    15:20 45:2　121:9 178:8,10\n56:16 92:5 95:5　昨天 106:22\n100:17 109:22　123:16 126:12\n135:22 136:4,9　York（约克） 1:18,19,21\n工作中 51:18　2:5,5,10,10 3:25\n90:6 96:22 136:15　4:2 5:23 58:8\n155:25 178:4　79:15,17 115:8,10\n运作 134:15　146:22 173:19\n176:9　176:14 188:3,7\n世界 38:2　YouTube（优兔） 120:20\n担心 182:10\n价值 19:10,25\n\n《联邦民事诉讼规则》\n\n第 30 条\n\n（e）证人审阅；修改。\n\n（1）审阅；修改声明。在证言录取完成前，经证人或当事人请求后，证人必须获准在主持官员通知其笔录或录音可供查阅后 30 日内：（A）审阅笔录或录音；以及（B）如形式或实质上存在修改，签署一份列明修改内容及作出修改理由的声明。\n\n（2）在主持官员证明书中注明的修改。主持官员必须在第 30(f)(1) 条规定的证明书中注明是否请求审阅；如已请求，必须附上证人在该 30 日期限内作出的任何修改。\n\n免责声明：上述联邦程序规则仅供参考。上述规则截至 APRIL 1, 2019 为现行有效。请参阅适用的《联邦民事诉讼规则》以获取最新信息。\n\nVERITEXT LEGAL SOLUTIONS COMPANY（VERITEXT 法律解决方案公司）证明书及披露声明\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions（Veritext 法律解决方案公司）声明，上述笔录是法庭记录员提交的谈话、问题及回答的真实、正确且完整的笔录。Veritext Legal Solutions 进一步声明，所附证物（如有）是法庭记录员和/或律师就本次证言录取提交的真实、正确且完整的文件，且该等文件均按照我们的诉讼支持及制作标准处理。\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 致力于依照经修订的《健康保险流通与责任法案》（Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act，HIPAA）有关受保护健康信息的规定，以及经修订的《格拉姆—里奇—布莱利法案》（Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act）有关个人可识别信息（Personally Identifiable Information，PII）的规定，维护客户及证人信息的保密性。实体笔录及证物均受严格的设施和人员访问控制管理。电子文件均以加密形式存储，并以加密方式传输给经认证而获准访问该等材料的各方。我们的数据托管于经 Tier 4 SSAE 16 认证的设施中。\n\nVeritext Legal Solutions 遵守与提供法庭记录服务有关的所有联邦及州法规，并且无论与任何诉讼的关系或其财务结果如何，均保持中立和独立。Veritext 在其与所有分包商签订的独立承包商协议中，要求其遵守上述专业及道德标准。\n\n有关 Veritext Legal Solutions 保密及安全政策和做法的咨询，应向本文件封面所示的 Veritext 客户服务专员提出，或访问 www.veritext.com。","key_entities":["Je","CIPA","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","GTV","GETTR"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":19,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":120,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":58552,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-05-20 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-05-20","updated_at":"2026-08-23 23:41:26"}