{"id":"court_ctb_404_27","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":404,"sub_number":27,"doc_type":"MOTION","filed_date":"2022-05-20","title":"EXHIBIT PAX 27 Rule 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"## **EXHIBIT PAX 27**\n\nRule 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\nIn re:\n\nChapter 11 Case No.\n\nHO WAN KWOK[1](#page-1-0)\n\n22-50073 (JAM)\n\nDebtor.\n\nMay 20, 2022\n\n## **DECLARATION OF MAKENZIE RUSSO IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.'S MOTION TO DISMISS CHAPTER 11 CASE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL JOINDER TO UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE APPOINTMENT OF A CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE**\n\nI, Makenzie Russo, declare:\n\n1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of New York and am an\n\nassociate at the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers, 7 Times Square, New York, NY 10036,\n\ncounsel for Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. (\"PAX\"). I respectfully submit this\n\nDeclaration in support of PAX's Motion to Dismiss Chapter 11 Case, or in the Alternative,\n\nPartial Joinder to United States Trustee (\"Motion to Dismiss\") [ECF 183].\n\n2. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of PAX Exhibit 27, \"Federal Rule of\n\nEvidence 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims.\" In connection with the May 25, 2022 Hearing\n\non PAX's Motion to Dismiss, PAX offers PAX Exhibit 27 as a summary of information relevant\n\nto the litigation claims referenced in Debtor's Schedule F.[2](#page-1-1)\n\n3. To compile PAX Exhibit 27, colleagues of mine at O'Melveny & Myers LLP (\"O'Melveny\") searched the public record to identify litigation matters involving the litigants\n\n1 The last four digits of the Debtor's taxpayer identification number are 9595.\n\n2 *See* Debtor's Schedule F, ECF 78.\n\nlisted on the Debtor's Schedule F that held a claim against the Debtor individually. For each of the relevant litigation matters identified, O'Melveny reviewed the court's public dockets, gathered the information reflected in the chart, and then summarized the current status of the litigation in the chart. For example, the chart indicates, among other things, whether a case had been dismissed and whether a trial date had been set, citing the appropriate docket entry number.\n\nDated: May 20, 2022 New York, New York Respectfully submitted,\n\n*/s/ Makenzie Russo* Makenzie Russo mrusso@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 728-5819\n\n*Attorney for Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.*\n\n| Claim According to | Status | Trial Date | | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|\n| Schedule F | | | | |\n| Beijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye Stainless Decoration Center et al. v. Wengui Guo et al., Case No. 653176/2017
(N.Y. Sup. 2017) | | | | |\n| | | Case dismissed | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
\\$12,000,000
Unknown
Unknown
\\$9,809,422.71
Unknown
\\$5,568,522
Unknown | Schedule F: Nonpriority Unsecured Creditors1
On May 12, 2020, Defendants' motion to dismiss was granted
\"to the extent that the complaint is dismissed in its entirety
pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7).\" Order, Dkt. No. 69 at 5. The
court ordered the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the
complaint. Id. | | |\n\n## **Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 Summary of Schedule F Litigation Claims**\n\n1 PAX searched the public record for any litigants listed on the Debtor's Schedule F that held a claim against the Debtor individually. *See* Schedule F: Nonpriority Unsecured Creditors, ECF 78 at 19–21. There were a number of purported litigation claims that PAX could not locate in the public record: Clark Hill, Gao Bingchen, Hero Grant Limited, Hong Zeng, Jumbo Century Limited, Kui Cheng, MacDonald, New Dynamic Development Limited, Sail Victory Limited, Strategic Vision, The Sherry-Netherland, Thomas Ragland, UBS AG, UBS AG (London Branch), Well Origin Limited, Yue Hua Zhu Shi.\n\n\n\n| Beijing Fu Le Hong Ma Jian | Unknown | | |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| Shu Shuang Shi Gong Cheng, | | | |\n| Ltd. | | | |\n| (\"Fu Le Hong Ma\") | | | |\n| Yua Hua Zhuang Shi | \\$1,571,530.36 | | |\n| He Bei Yue Hua Zhuang Shi | Unknown | | |\n| Gong Cheng Ltd | | | |\n| (\"Yue Hua Zhuang Shi\") | | | |\n| Jian Gong | \\$5,380,262.32 | | |\n| Jiang Su Province Jian Gong | Unknown | | |\n| Group Ltd Beijing Branch | | | |\n| (\"Jian Gong\") | | | |\n| (S.D.N.Y. 2017)2
Tang et al. v. Guo, Case No. 1:17-cv-09031 | | | |\n| Baiqiao Tang | Unknown | On February 1, 2022, the Court ordered that \"all claims and | Case dismissed |\n| Jing Geng | Unknown | causes of action asserted in this action by Plaintiff Tang and | |\n| | | Plaintiff Geng are dismissed with prejudice\" where Plaintiff | |\n| | | Tang \"has failed to prosecute his claims\" and \"Plaintiff Geng | |\n| | | passed away in April 2021, and no motion to substitute a proper | |\n| | | party, or for an extension of time to do so, has been filed.\" | |\n| | | Order, Dkt No. 97. | |\n| | | Watson Meng and Boxun Inc. v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 159636/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Nov. 7, 2017) | |\n| Boxun Inc.3 | Unknown | On October 7, 2021, the court certified the case as ready for | No trial date set |\n| Watson Meng4 | Unknown | trial. Note of Issue, Dkt. No. 57. Kwok moved to vacate the | |\n| Weican Meng/Boxun Inc. | \\$1,000,000 | note of issue and the reply briefing was filed on November 9, | |\n| | | 2021. Reply Aff. in Supp. of Mot. to Vacate Note of Issue, Dkt | |\n| | | No. 120. | |\n| Keyi Zilkie, Huizhen Wang, Chao-Chih Chiu, Yunxia Wu v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo, Index No. 652843/2021 (N.Y. Sup. April 29, 2021) | | | |\n| Chao-Chih Chiu | Unknown | On November 5, 2021, the court entered a stay pursuant to the | N/A |\n| Huizhen Wang | Unknown | parties'
stipulation that a stay of the action was appropriate | |\n| Keyi Ziklie | Unknown | while Plaintiffs seek distributions from the SEC-administered | |\n\n2 These parties filed claims in New York Supreme Court. Compl., *Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al*., Case No. [153969/2019](http) (N.Y. Sup. 2019). Those proceedings have been dormant since September 30, 2019, the date the complaint was filed. *See* Docket, *Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al*., Case No. 153969/2019 (N.Y. Sup. 2019).\n\n3 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F. 4 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n| Yunxia Wu | Unknown | Fair Fund in connection with their claims. Order, Dkt. No. 30 at | |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|\n| | | 2. | |\n| | | Zhengjun Dong, Wen Lin, Kaixin Hong, Chenglong Wang v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo, Index No.
652190/2021 | (N.Y. Sup. 2021) |\n| Chenglong Wang | Unknown | Plaintiffs
requested severance of claims against Kwok
in light of | N/A |\n| Kaixin Hong | Unknown | his bankruptcy
in order
to proceed against other defendants. | |\n| Wen Lin | Unknown | Order
to Show Cause, Dkt. No. 106. | |\n| Zhengjun Dong | Unknown | | |\n| Rong Zhang, Xiaodan Wang, Chong Shen Raphanella | | v. Voice of Guo, GTV, Saraca, ROL Miles Guo, Case No. 2:21-cv-01079 | (D. Ariz. 2021) |\n| Chong Shen Raphanella | Unknown | Partial Motion to Dismiss fully briefed as of February 2, 2022 | N/A |\n| Rong Zhang | Unknown | and not yet decided. Mot.
to Dismiss Reply, Dkt. No. 43. | |\n| Xiaodan Wang | Unknown | | |\n| | | Haihong C. Wang v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 3:21-cv-00359
(D. Conn. 2021) | |\n| Haihong Wang | Unknown | Kwok filed an answer to the complaint on October 22, 2021. | N/A |\n| | | Dkt No. 42. There was no other docket activity until the Notice | |\n| | | of Bankruptcy was filed on February 18, 2022. See Docket. | |\n| Weiguo Sun, Linda He Cheing, Jia Li Wang, Jiamei
Lu, Jun Liu, Mao-Fu Weng, Ruqin Wang, Teli Chen, Weixiang Ge, Shuang Wang, Xingyu | | | |\n| | | Yan, Yan Gao, Yi LI and Ying Liu v. GTV, Saraca, Voice of Guo, Wengui Guo,
Case No.
1:21-cv-04529 | (S.D.N.Y. 2021) |\n| Jia Li Wang | \\$430,000 | As of October 14, 2021, discovery in this action was stayed | N/A |\n| Jiamei Lu | Unknown | while plaintiffs pursue recovery in connection with the SEC | |\n| Jun Liu | Unknown | administered Fair Fund. Order, Dkt No. 79. | |\n| Linda He Cheung | Unknown | | |\n| Moa-Fu [Weng] | Unknown | | |\n| Ruquin Wang | Unknown | | |\n| Shuang Wang | Unknown | | |\n| Teli Chen | Unknown | | |\n| Weiguo Sun | Unknown | | |\n| Weixiang Ge | Unknown | | |\n| Xingyu Yan | Unknown | | |\n| Yan Gao | Unknown | | |\n| Yi Li | Unknown | | |\n| Ying Liu | Unknown | | |\n| Jianhu Yi and Quiju Jia v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:21-cv-02669
(S.D.N.Y. 2021) | | | |\n| Jian Hu Yi | Unknown | As of September 22, 2021, discovery in this action was stayed | N/A |\n| Quiju Jia | Unknown | while plaintiffs pursue recovery in connection with the SEC | |\n| | | administered Fair Fund. Order, Dkt.
No.
39. According to a | |\n\n\n\n| | | status update, the parties are in continued settlement discussions | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|\n| | | to recover from the SEC fund. Letter, Dkt. No. 47. | |\n| | June Shi v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, | Case No. 1:21-cv-01408
(N.D. Ill. 2021) | |\n| June Shi | Unknown | Kwok filed an Answer of September 22, 2021. Amended | N/A |\n| | | Answer, Dkt No. 33. The parties stipulated to a settlement of | |\n| | | some claims on January 14, 2022. Stipulation of Dismissal of | |\n| | | Count VII With Prejudice, Dkt No. 38. | |\n| | | Fan Bingbing v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 156619/2017
(N.Y. Sup. July 24, 2017) | |\n| Fan Bingbing | Unknown | There is no docket activity in this case after the amended | N/A |\n| | | complaint was filed on November 27, 2021. See Docket. | |\n| | | Wengui Guo v. Guo Baosheng, Yan Zhao and Ning Ye, Index No. 151251/2019
(N.Y. Sup. May 3, 2019) | |\n| Guo Baosheng | \\$12,000,000 | There was a gap in the litigation between June 18, 2020 and | N/A |\n| Baosheng Guo5 | Unknown | March 23, 2022. See generally, Docket. During this time | |\n| Ning Ye | \\$12,000,000 | frame, there is only one docket entry. See Notice of ADR | |\n| Yan Zhao | \\$3,000,000 | Options, Dkt
No. 65. On March 21, 2022, the Defendants filed a | |\n| | | Notice of Motion for Leave of the Court to File Supplemental | |\n| | | Motion to Dismiss. Notice, Dkt. No. 66. A Notice of | |\n| | | Bankruptcy was filed shortly thereafter. Notice of Bankruptcy, | |\n| | | Dkt No. 72. | |\n| | | Jiansheng Xie and Jiefu Zheng v. Wengui Guo, Case No. 155995/2017
(N.Y. Supp. 2017) | |\n| Jianshengxie and Jiefu Zheng | Unknown | There is no docket activity in this case after the amended | N/A |\n| | | complaint was filed on June 30, 2017. See
generally,
Docket. | |\n| | | Jonathan Young v. Guo Wengui, Saraca, Golden Spring, Rule of Law Foundation, Case No. 154683/2020 | (N.Y. Sup. 2020) |\n| Jonathan Young | Unknown | Defendants moved to dismiss the case, and those pleadings were | N/A |\n| | | fully briefed as of May 18, 2021. See Docket. There was no | |\n| | | docket activity in the action between May 18, 2021 and | |\n| | | February 16, 2022, when the notice of bankruptcy was filed. Id. | |\n| Wengui
Guo v. Jun Chen (a/k/a Jonathan Ho), Case No. 18-cv-03800, (D.N.J. 2019) | | | |\n| Jun Chen (aka Jonathan Ho) | \\$1,000,000 | On February 22, 2022, the Court ordered the parties to submit | Case dismissed |\n| | | confidential settlement memos on or before March 3, 2022. | pending court |\n| | | Text Order, Dkt No. 52. A settlement mediation was scheduled | approval |\n| | | for March 10, 2022. Scheduling Order, Dkt No. 50. On March | |\n| | | 18, 2022 the
parties \"agreed to a mutual dismissal of their | |\n| | | claims\" and the
court entered an order \"administratively | |\n\n5 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n\n\n| | | terminating the action on his records pending approval of the | | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--|\n| | | dismissal by the Bankruptcy Court, at which time it will be | | |\n| | | dismissed with prejudice.\" Order, Dkt No. 55. | | |\n| | | Liehong Zhuang and Xiao Yan Zhu v. Wengui Guo and Saraca Media Group, Index No. 654999/2020 | (N.Y. Sup Oct. 5, 2020) | |\n| Liehong Zhuang | Unknown | On September 23, 2021, the Court granted Kwok's motion to | N/A | |\n| Liehong Zhuang/Xiao Yan | \\$1,005,000 | dismiss in part. Order, Dkt
No. 77. On February 9, 2022, | | |\n| Zhu6 | | Kwok requested that a discovery conference be adjourned in | | |\n| Xiao Yan Zhu | Unknown | light of his not having yet filed an Answer. Letter, Dkt No. 82. | | |\n| | | A notice of bankruptcy was filed shortly thereafter. Notice of | | |\n| | | Bankruptcy, Dkt
No.
85. | | |\n| | | Logan Cheng aka Shuiyan Cheng v. Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:20-cv-05678
(S.D.N.Y. 2020) | | |\n| Logan Cheng (aka Shiuyan | Unknown | Logan Cheng obtained a judgment for \\$196,940.39 on account | N/A | |\n| Cheng) | | of a counterclaim filed in the District of Nevada. Compl., Ex. 5, | | |\n| | | Dkt No. 1-5.
Cheng brought an enforcement proceeding in the | | |\n| | | Southern District of New York. Compl., Dkt No. 1. Both | | |\n| | | parties moved for partial summary judgment, which was fully | | |\n| | | briefed as of February 15, 2022. See generally, Docket. | | |\n| | | Rui Ma v. Guo Wengui and Golden Spring NY, Index No. 158140/2017
(N.Y. Sup. Sept. 11, 2017 | | |\n| Rui Ma | \\$20,000,000 | The case was certified as ready for trial on January 29, 2022. | No trial date set. | |\n| | | Note of Issue, Dkt No. 27. Kwok requested oral argument to | | |\n| | | vacate the Note of Issue on February 15, 2022. Letter, Dkt No. | | |\n| | | 97. | | |\n| | | Ruizheng An v. GTV, Saraca, Guo Wengui, Case No. 1:20-cv-06555 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) | | |\n| Ruizheng An | Unknown | On February 1, 2021, the court ordered an extension of time to | N/A | |\n| | | finalize a settlement. Order, Dkt No. 41. There has been no | | |\n| | | docket activity since. See generally, Docket. | | |\n| | Samuel Dan Nunberg v. Guo Wengui, Index No. 150141/2020
(N.Y. Sup. Feb. 19, 2020) | | | |\n| Samuel Dan Nunberg | Unknown | Nunberg filed an amended complaint on January 21, 2022. | N/A | |\n| Samuel Nunberg7 | \\$1,000,000 | Amended Compl., Dkt No. 96. Kwok moved to strike the | | |\n| | | complaint on February 10, 2022. Mem. of Law in Supp.
of Mot. | | |\n| | | to Strike, Dkt No. 101. | | |\n| Wengui Guo v. Yeliang Xia, No. 18-cv-174
(E.D.Va. 2018) | | | | |\n\n6 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, these names appear as litigation claim holders twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n7 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder more than once on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n\n\n| Yang Yeliang Xia Lan | Unknown | A jury awarded Kwok \\$100,000 judgment plus interest for | N/A | |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|\n| | | defamation. Order, Dkt No. 140. The jury awarded the Xia | | |\n| | | \\$10,000 for defamation. Id. | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | Xia filed a notice of appeal on September 27, 2017. Notice of | | |\n| | | Appeal, Dkt
No. 141. Xia requested oral argument on the | | |\n| | | appeal in December 2021. Wengui Guo v. Yeliang Xia, Case | | |\n| | | No. 19-2062 (4th Cir. 2021), Dkt No. 62. The Court of Appeals | | |\n| | | subsequently entered an order deferring consideration of the | | |\n| | | motion for oral argument pending assignment of the case to a | | |\n| | | panel. Order, Dkt No. 63. | | |\n| | | WA&HF LLC and Ruizheng An v. Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 2:21-cv-00490
(W.D. Wa. 2020) | | |\n| WA&HF LLC | \\$319,130 | The parties entered into a stipulation of dismissal on April 1, | Case dismissed | |\n| | | 2022, upon being able to \"fully compromise[] and settle[] the | | |\n| | | claims.\" Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, Dkt No. 21. | | |\n| | | Xiqui (\"Bob\") Fu v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 20-cv-00257
(W.D.Tx. 2020) | | |\n| Xiqui (\"Bob\") Fu | Unknown | Kwok's Motion to Dismiss was denied on January 15, 2022. | N/A | |\n| | | Order, Dkt No. 97. The case is administratively closed pending | | |\n| | | the outcome of Kwok's bankruptcy. | | |\n| Yan Huang v. Wengui Guo, Index No. 156552/2017
(N.Y. Sup. 2017) | | | | |\n| Yan Huang | Unknown | A stipulation of settlement was entered on April 6, 2021. | Case settled | |\n| | | Stipulation of Settlement, Dkt No. 68. | | |\n| | | Zheng Wu and Yang Lan v. Guo Wengui, Index No. 152123/2018
(N.Y. Sup 2018) | | |\n| Yang Lan | Unknown | Kwok filed an Answer on April 25, 2019. Answer, Dkt No. 36. | N/A | |\n| Yang Lan and Qu Zheng8 | \\$10,000,000 | On March 2, 2020, the Court ordered the parties to participate in | | |\n| Zhang Qu (aka Bruno Wu) | Unknown | a settlement mediation conference. Order, Dkt No. 46. Notices | | |\n| | | of appearance and the notice of bankruptcy
are the only
docket | | |\n| | | activity since that date. See generally, Docket. | | |\n| Wengui Guo v. Danyu Lin, Case No. 2018CP3203623
(S.C., Lexington Cty. 2018) | | | | |\n| Danyu Lin | Unknown | The South Carolina court system lists the status as \"dismissed.\" | Case dismissed | |\n| | | See generally, Docket. | | |\n\n8 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, these names appear as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.","body_zh":"证据 PAX 27\n\n关于诉讼请求的《证据规则》第 1006 条摘要\n美国康涅狄格联邦破产法院布里奇波特分部\n\n关于：\n\n第 11 章案件编号\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）[1]\n\n22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。\n\nMay 20, 2022\n为进一步支持 PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）提出的驳回第 11 章案件动议，或作为替代方案，对美国受托人提出的请求作出命令指示任命第 11 章受托人的动议的部分加入之 MAKENZIE RUSSO（玛肯齐·鲁索）声明\n\n本人，Makenzie Russo，声明如下：\n\n1. 本人是一名获准在纽约州执业的律师，并系 O'Melveny & Myers（欧麦文尼·迈尔斯）律师事务所的助理律师，该所地址为 7 Times Square, New York, NY 10036，担任 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.（“PAX”）的代理律师。本人谨提交本声明，以支持 PAX 提出的驳回第 11 章案件动议，或作为替代方案，对美国受托人（“驳回动议”）[ECF 183]所提动议的部分加入。\n\n2. 随附的是 PAX 证据 27，即“关于诉讼请求的《联邦证据规则》第 1006 条摘要”的真实、准确副本。就 May 25, 2022 关于 PAX 驳回动议的听证会而言，PAX 提交 PAX 证据 27，作为债务人附表 F 中所提及诉讼请求相关信息的摘要。[2]\n\n3. 为编制 PAX 证据 27，本人在 O'Melveny & Myers LLP（“O'Melveny”）的同事检索了公开记录，以确定涉及债务人附表 F 所列、对债务人个人持有请求权的诉讼当事人的诉讼事项。\n\n1 债务人纳税人识别号码的最后四位数为 9595。\n\n2 见债务人附表 F，ECF 78。\n\n对于所确定的每一相关诉讼事项，O'Melveny 审阅了法院的公开案卷，收集了图表中反映的信息，随后在图表中概述了诉讼的当前状态。例如，该图表除其他事项外，表明某案件是否已被驳回以及是否已确定审判日期，并引用相应的案卷条目编号。\n\n日期：May 20, 2022 纽约州纽约市 谨此提交，\n\n/s/ Makenzie Russo Makenzie Russo mrusso@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 电话：(212) 728-5819\n\nPacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. 的代理律师\n\n根据附表 F 所列请求权 状态 审判日期\n\nBeijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye Stainless Decoration Center et al.（北京中贤伟业不锈钢装饰中心等）v. Wengui Guo（郭文贵）et al., Case No. 653176/2017\n(N.Y. Sup. 2017)\n案件已驳回\n\n未知\n未知\n未知\n\\$12,000,000\n未知\n未知\n\\$9,809,422.71\n未知\n\\$5,568,522\n未知 附表 F：非优先无担保债权人1\n在 May 12, 2020，被告提出的驳回动议获准，“但仅限于依据 CPLR 3211(a)(7) 全部驳回起诉书。”命令，Dkt. No. 69 第 5 页。法院命令书记员录入判决书，驳回起诉书。同上。\n附表 F 诉讼请求的《联邦证据规则》第 1006 条摘要\n\n1 PAX 检索了公开记录，以查找债务人附表 F 所列、对债务人个人持有请求权的任何诉讼当事人。见附表 F：非优先无担保债权人，ECF 78 第 19–21 页。PAX 无法在公开记录中找到若干声称的诉讼请求：Clark Hill（克拉克·希尔）、Gao Bingchen（高冰辰）、Hero Grant Limited（英雄授予有限公司）、Hong Zeng（曾红）、Jumbo Century Limited（巨世纪有限公司）、Kui Cheng（程奎）、MacDonald（麦克唐纳）、New Dynamic Development Limited（新动态发展有限公司）、Sail Victory Limited（航胜有限公司）、Strategic Vision（战略愿景）、The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉荷兰酒店）、Thomas Ragland（托马斯·拉格兰）、UBS AG（瑞银集团）、UBS AG (London Branch)（瑞银集团〔伦敦分行〕）、Well Origin Limited（良源有限公司）、Yue Hua Zhu Shi（悦华装饰）。\n\nBeijing Fu Le Hong Ma Jian Shu Shuang Shi Gong Cheng, Ltd.（北京富乐鸿马建筑装饰工程有限公司）\n（“Fu Le Hong Ma”） 未知\n\nYua Hua Zhuang Shi \\$1,571,530.36\nHe Bei Yue Hua Zhuang Shi Gong Cheng Ltd（河北悦华装饰工程有限公司）\n（“Yue Hua Zhuang Shi”） 未知\n\nJian Gong \\$5,380,262.32\nJiang Su Province Jian Gong Group Ltd Beijing Branch（江苏省建工集团有限公司北京分公司）\n（“Jian Gong”） 未知\n\n(S.D.N.Y. 2017)2\nTang（唐）et al. v. Guo, Case No. 1:17-cv-09031\nBaiqiao Tang（唐百乔） 未知 在 February 1, 2022，法院命令，“原告 Tang 和原告 Geng 在本案中提出的所有请求和诉因均被有偏见地驳回”，原因是原告 Tang“未能推进其请求”，且“原告 Geng 于 April 2021 去世，未曾提出动议以替换适格当事人，或请求延长提出该等动议的期限。”命令，Dkt No. 97。 案件已驳回\nJing Geng（耿晶） 未知\n\nWatson Meng（孟伟灿）and Boxun Inc.（博讯公司）v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 159636/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Nov. 7, 2017)\nBoxun Inc.3 未知 在 October 7, 2021，法院证明该案件已具备审判条件。审判议题通知，Dkt. No. 57。Kwok 提出动议，请求撤销审判议题通知，答复书状已于 November 9, 2021 提交。支持撤销审判议题通知动议的答复宣誓书，Dkt No. 120。 未确定审判日期\nWatson Meng4 未知\nWeican Meng/Boxun Inc. \\$1,000,000\n\nKeyi Zilkie（齐克利·齐）、Huizhen Wang（王慧珍）、Chao-Chih Chiu（邱肇智）、Yunxia Wu（吴云霞）v. GTV、Saraca（萨拉卡）and Wengui Guo, Index No. 652843/2021 (N.Y. Sup. April 29, 2021)\nChao-Chih Chiu 未知 在 November 5, 2021，法院依据当事人之间的约定作出中止令，认定在原告就其请求向由 SEC 管理的公平基金寻求分配期间，中止本案是适当的。命令，Dkt. No. 30 第 2 页。 不适用\nHuizhen Wang 未知\nKeyi Ziklie 未知\n\n2 该等当事人在纽约州最高法院提起了请求。Compl., Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al., Case No. [153969/2019] (N.Y. Sup. 2019)。自 September 30, 2019 即提交起诉书之日起，该等程序一直处于停滞状态。见 Docket, Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al., Case No. 153969/2019 (N.Y. Sup. 2019)。\n\n3 PAX 不知何故，该名称在债务人附表 F 中两次出现，作为诉讼请求持有人。4 PAX 不知何故，该名称在债务人附表 F 中两次出现，作为诉讼请求持有人。\n\nYunxia Wu 未知\n\nZhengjun Dong（董正军）、Wen Lin（林雯）、Kaixin Hong（洪凯欣）、Chenglong Wang（王成龙）v. GTV、Saraca and Wengui Guo, Index No. 652190/2021 (N.Y. Sup. 2021)\nChenglong Wang 未知 鉴于 Kwok 的破产，原告请求将针对 Kwok 的请求分离，以便继续针对其他被告进行诉讼。说明理由令，Dkt. No. 106。 不适用\nKaixin Hong 未知\nWen Lin 未知\nZhengjun Dong 未知\n\nRong Zhang（张荣）、Xiaodan Wang（王晓丹）、Chong Shen Raphanella（沈拉法内拉）v. Voice of Guo（郭之声）、GTV、Saraca、ROL Miles Guo（ROL 郭文贵）, Case No. 2:21-cv-01079 (D. Ariz. 2021)\nChong Shen Raphanella 未知 截至 February 2, 2022，部分驳回动议的书状均已提交完毕，尚未作出裁决。驳回动议答复，Dkt. No. 43。 不适用\nRong Zhang 未知\nXiaodan Wang 未知\n\nHaihong C. Wang（王海红）v. GTV、Saraca、Wengui Guo, Case No. 3:21-cv-00359\n(D. Conn. 2021)\nHaihong Wang 未知 Kwok 于 October 22, 2021 对起诉书提交了答辩。Dkt No. 42。在破产通知于 February 18, 2022 提交前，没有其他案卷活动。见案卷。 不适用\n\nWeiguo Sun（孙卫国）、Linda He Cheing（何清玲）、Jia Li Wang（王佳丽）、Jiamei Lu（陆佳美）、Jun Liu（刘军）、Mao-Fu Weng（翁茂富）、Ruqin Wang（王汝琴）、Teli Chen（陈特丽）、Weixiang Ge（葛伟祥）、Shuang Wang（王爽）、Xingyu Yan（严星宇）、Yan Gao（高燕）、Yi LI（李毅）and Ying Liu（刘颖）v. GTV、Saraca、Voice of Guo、Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:21-cv-04529 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)\nJia Li Wang \\$430,000 截至 October 14, 2021，在原告就由 SEC 管理的公平基金寻求追回款项期间，本案中的证据开示被中止。命令，Dkt No. 79。 不适用\nJiamei Lu 未知\nJun Liu 未知\nLinda He Cheung 未知\nMoa-Fu [Weng] 未知\nRuquin Wang 未知\nShuang Wang 未知\nTeli Chen 未知\nWeiguo Sun 未知\nWeixiang Ge 未知\nXingyu Yan 未知\nYan Gao 未知\nYi Li 未知\nYing Liu 未知\n\nJianhu Yi（易建湖）and Quiju Jia（贾曲菊）v. GTV、Saraca、Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:21-cv-02669\n(S.D.N.Y. 2021)\nJian Hu Yi 未知 截至 September 22, 2021，在原告就由 SEC 管理的公平基金寻求追回款项期间，本案中的证据开示被中止。命令，Dkt. No. 39。根据一份状态更新，当事人正在继续进行和解磋商，以从 SEC 基金获得赔偿。函件，Dkt. No. 47。 不适用\nQuiju Jia 未知\n\nJune Shi（施军）v. GTV、Saraca、Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:21-cv-01408\n(N.D. Ill. 2021)\nJune Shi 未知 Kwok 于 September 22, 2021 提交答辩。修订答辩，Dkt No. 33。当事人于 January 14, 2022 约定就部分请求达成和解。第 VII 罪名项有偏见驳回约定，Dkt No. 38。 不适用\n\nFan Bingbing（范冰冰）v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 156619/2017\n(N.Y. Sup. July 24, 2017)\nFan Bingbing 未知 自修订起诉书于 November 27, 2021 提交后，本案没有案卷活动。见案卷。 不适用\n\nWengui Guo v. Guo Baosheng（郭宝胜）、Yan Zhao（赵岩）and Ning Ye（叶宁）, Index No. 151251/2019\n(N.Y. Sup. May 3, 2019)\nGuo Baosheng \\$12,000,000 在 June 18, 2020 至 March 23, 2022 期间，诉讼存在一段空档期。总体见案卷。在此期间，只有一个案卷条目。见替代性争议解决选项通知，Dkt No. 65。在 March 21, 2022，被告提交了请求法院准许提交补充驳回动议的动议通知。通知，Dkt. No. 66。此后不久提交了破产通知。破产通知，Dkt No. 72。 不适用\nBaosheng Guo5 未知\nNing Ye \\$12,000,000\nYan Zhao \\$3,000,000\n\nJiansheng Xie（谢建胜）and Jiefu Zheng（郑杰夫）v. Wengui Guo, Case No. 155995/2017\n(N.Y. Supp. 2017)\nJianshengxie and Jiefu Zheng 未知 自修订起诉书于 June 30, 2017 提交后，本案没有案卷活动。总体见案卷。 不适用\n\nJonathan Young（乔纳森·杨）v. Guo Wengui、Saraca、Golden Spring（金泉）、Rule of Law Foundation（法治基金会）, Case No. 154683/2020 (N.Y. Sup. 2020)\nJonathan Young 未知 被告提出动议请求驳回本案，截至 May 18, 2021，相关书状均已提交完毕。见案卷。本案自 May 18, 2021 至 February 16, 2022 提交破产通知期间没有案卷活动。同上。 不适用\n\nWengui Guo v. Jun Chen（陈军）(a/k/a Jonathan Ho（何俊）), Case No. 18-cv-03800, (D.N.J. 2019)\nJun Chen (aka Jonathan Ho) \\$1,000,000 在 February 22, 2022，法院命令当事人于 March 3, 2022 或之前提交保密和解备忘录。文本命令，Dkt No. 52。和解调解定于 March 10, 2022 举行。排期命令，Dkt No. 50。在 March 18, 2022，当事人“同意相互驳回其请求”，法院作出命令，“在等待批准期间，在其记录中行政性地终止本案”\n\n5 PAX 不知何故，该名称在债务人附表 F 中两次出现，作为诉讼请求持有人。\n\n由破产法院驳回，届时将作出有偏见驳回。”命令，Dkt No. 55。\n\nLiehong Zhuang（庄烈宏）和 Xiao Yan Zhu（朱晓燕）诉 Wengui Guo（郭文贵）及 Saraca Media Group（Saraca媒体集团），Index No. 654999/2020 （纽约州最高法院，Oct. 5, 2020）\n\nLiehong Zhuang 未知 法院于 September 23, 2021 部分准许 Kwok 的驳回动议。命令，Dkt No. 77。于 February 9, 2022， 不适用\n\nLiehong Zhuang/Xiao Yan \\$1,005,000 Zhu6 Kwok 请求延期举行证据开示会议，原因是其尚未提交答辩状。\n\nXiao Yan Zhu 未知 信函，Dkt No. 82。其后不久提交了破产通知。破产通知，Dkt No. 85。\n\nLogan Cheng（又名 Shuiyan Cheng）诉 Wengui Guo，Case No. 1:20-cv-05678\n（纽约南区，2020）\n\nLogan Cheng（又名 Shiuyan Cheng） 未知 Logan Cheng 就其在内华达州联邦地区法院提出的反诉获得 \\$196,940.39 的判决。起诉状，附件5，Dkt No. 1-5。 不适用\n\nCheng 在 Southern District of New York（纽约南区）提起执行程序。起诉状，Dkt No. 1。双方均提出部分简易判决动议，截至 February 15, 2022 已完成书面陈述。详见案卷。\n\nRui Ma（马睿）诉 Guo Wengui（郭文贵）及 Golden Spring NY（纽约金泉），Index No. 158140/2017\n（纽约州最高法院，Sept. 11, 2017）\n\nRui Ma \\$20,000,000 该案于 January 29, 2022 被认证为已具备审判条件。争点通知书，Dkt No. 27。Kwok 于 February 15, 2022 请求就撤销争点通知书进行口头辩论。信函，Dkt No. 97。 未确定审判日期。\n\nRuizheng An（安瑞政）诉 GTV、Saraca、Guo Wengui，Case No. 1:20-cv-06555 （纽约南区，2020）\n\nRuizheng An 未知 于 February 1, 2021，法院下令延长期限以完成和解。命令，Dkt No. 41。此后案卷没有任何活动。详见案卷。 不适用\n\nSamuel Dan Nunberg（塞缪尔·丹·南伯格）诉 Guo Wengui，Index No. 150141/2020\n（纽约州最高法院，Feb. 19, 2020）\n\nSamuel Dan Nunberg 未知 Nunberg 于 January 21, 2022 提交修正起诉状。修正起诉状，Dkt No. 96。Kwok 于 February 10, 2022 提出删除起诉状动议。支持删除动议的法律备忘录，Dkt No. 101。 不适用\n\nSamuel Nunberg7 \\$1,000,000\n\nWengui Guo（郭文贵）诉 Yeliang Xia（夏业良），No. 18-cv-174\n（弗吉尼亚东区，2018）\n\n6 PAX 不知何故，这些姓名在债务人附表F中两次列为诉讼请求权持有人。\n\n7 PAX 不知何故，该姓名在债务人附表F中不止一次列为诉讼请求权持有人。\n\nYang Yeliang Xia Lan 未知 陪审团就诽谤判给 Kwok \\$100,000 的判决及利息。命令，Dkt No. 140。陪审团就诽谤判给 Xia \\$10,000。见同上。 不适用\n\nXia 于 September 27, 2017 提交上诉通知。上诉通知，Dkt No. 141。Xia 于 December 2021 请求就该上诉进行口头辩论。Wengui Guo 诉 Yeliang Xia，Case No. 19-2062 （第四巡回上诉法院，2021），Dkt No. 62。上诉法院随后作出命令，在该案分配至合议庭审理之前暂缓审议口头辩论动议。命令，Dkt No. 63。\n\nWA&HF LLC（WA&HF有限责任公司）和 Ruizheng An（安瑞政）诉 Saraca、Wengui Guo，Case No. 2:21-cv-00490\n（华盛顿西区，2020）\n\nWA&HF LLC \\$319,130 双方于 April 1, 2022 达成驳回协议，因其得以“完全妥协并解决”各项请求。驳回协议及命令，Dkt No. 21。 案件已驳回\n\nXiqui（“Bob”）Fu（傅希奎）诉 Guo Wengui，Case No. 20-cv-00257\n（得克萨斯西区，2020）\n\nXiqui（“Bob”）Fu 未知 Kwok 的驳回动议于 January 15, 2022 被驳回。命令，Dkt No. 97。该案因等待 Kwok 破产程序的结果而被行政关闭。 不适用\n\nYan Huang（黄燕）诉 Wengui Guo，Index No. 156552/2017\n（纽约州最高法院，2017）\n\nYan Huang 未知 于 April 6, 2021 录入和解协议。和解协议，Dkt No. 68。 案件已和解\n\nZheng Wu（吴征）和 Yang Lan（杨澜）诉 Guo Wengui，Index No. 152123/2018\n（纽约州最高法院，2018）\n\nYang Lan 未知 Kwok 于 April 25, 2019 提交答辩状。答辩状，Dkt No. 36。 不适用\n\nYang Lan 和 Qu Zheng8 \\$10,000,000 于 March 2, 2020，法院命令双方参加和解调解会议。命令，Dkt No. 46。自该日起，出庭通知和破产通知是案卷中仅有的活动。详见案卷。\n\nZhang Qu（又名 Bruno Wu） 未知\n\nWengui Guo 诉 Danyu Lin（林丹宇），Case No. 2018CP3203623\n（南卡罗来纳州，列克星敦县，2018）\n\nDanyu Lin 未知 南卡罗来纳州法院系统将状态列为“已驳回”。详见案卷。 案件已驳回\n\n8 PAX 不知何故，这些姓名在债务人附表F中两次列为诉讼请求权持有人。","key_entities":["Guo","Kwok","Saraca","GTV","Miles Guo","Ho Wan Kwok","CIPA"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":1,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":21,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":27,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":30,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":33,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":36,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":38,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":41,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":42,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":43,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":46,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":47,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":50,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":52,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":55,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":57,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":62,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":63,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":66,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":68,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":69,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":72,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":78,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":79,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":82,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":96,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":97,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":101,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":106,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":140,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":183,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":3495,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-05-20 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-05-20","updated_at":"2026-08-23 21:00:07"}