{"id":"court_ctb_4177_2","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":4177,"sub_number":2,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2025-02-14","title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT In re:","summary_zh":"法院裁定（附件） —— Ho Wan Kwok 破产案（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo），CTB 22-50073 ECF #4177-2（2025-02-14立案）。破产法院部分批准第 11 章受托人 Luc A. Despins 提出的第三次延期动议（ECF No. 4004），将受托人提起撤销权诉讼（avoidance actions）的诉讼时效延长至 2025 年 8 月 15 日。法院同时明确，本次裁定为针对全案撤销权诉讼的最后一次整体延期。","summary_en":"Court Order (Exhibit) —— In re Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui), CTB 22-50073 ECF #4177-2 (filed Feb 14, 2025). The Bankruptcy Court granted in part Chapter 11 Trustee Luc A. Despins's third extension motion (ECF No. 4004), extending the statutes of limitations under 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to file avoidance actions through August 15, 2025. The court noted this would be the final estate-wide extension for avoidance actions.","body_en":"#### **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT**\n\nIn re:\n\n HO WAN KWOK, *et al.*, 1\n\nDebtors.\n\n Chapter 11 Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) (Jointly Administered)\n\nRe: ECF No. 4004\n\n#### **ORDER GRANTING IN PART THIRD MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR TRUSTEE TO FILE AVOIDANCE ACTIONS**\n\nOn February 15, 2024, the Court entered the Memorandum of Decision and Order Granting in Part Motion to Extend Deadlines (the \"First Extension Order\"). (ECF No. 2921.) After notice and an evidentiary hearing held on February 13, 2024 (the \"First Extension Hearing\"), the First Extension Order granted, for the reasons stated therein, the Motion for Entry of Order Extending Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"First Extension Motion\") (ECF No. 2509), filed by Mr. Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as the Chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") for the bankruptcy estate of Mr. Ho Wan Kwok. The First Extension Order extended the statutes of limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to file avoidance actions from February 15, 2024 – the two-year anniversary of the voluntary filing by Mr. Kwok of his Chapter 11 petition – to August 15, 2024 (the \"First Extension Order,\" ECF No. 2921).\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n# Case 22-50073 Doc 4106 Filed 02/14/25 Entered 02/14/25 10:48:15 Page 2 of 5 Case 22-50073 Doc 4177-2 Filed 02/27/25 Entered 02/27/25 15:03:08 Page 2 of 5\n\nOn July 19, 2024, the Trustee filed the First Supplemental Motion to Extend August 15, 2024 Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"Second Extension Motion\"). (ECF No. 3329.) Several objections were filed to the Second Extension Motion. An evidentiary hearing on the Second Extension Motion was held on August 13, 2024. After consideration of the arguments advanced prior to and during the evidentiary hearing, on August 14, 2024, an Order Granting the Second Extension Motion entered extending the statutes of limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to file avoidance actions from August 15, 2024 to February 15, 2025 (the \"Second Extension Order,\" ECF No. 3417).2\n\nOn January 24, 2025, the Trustee filed the Second Supplemental Motion to Extend Deadline for Trustee to File Avoidance Actions (the \"Third Extension Motion\"). (ECF No. 4004.) On January 27, 2025, the Clerk of Court issued a Notice of Hearing, scheduling a hearing on Third Extension Motion to be held on February 11, 2025, and setting a deadline of February 7, 2025, to object to the Third Extension Motion. (ECF No. 4009.)\n\nOn February 7, 2025, timely objections to the Third Extension Motion (the \"Objections\") were filed by G Club Operations, LLC, Himalaya International Financial Group Limited and others joining, Amazon Web Services, Inc., Miller Motorcars, Inc., Ogier, FFP (BVI) Ltd., Apple Inc., American Express Company, Meta Platforms, Inc., and Weddle Law PC (the \"Objectors\").3\n\n<sup>2</sup> The First and Second Extension Orders are incorporated herein by reference.\n\n<sup>3</sup> Several parties filed objections in Mr. Kwok's Chapter 11 case. ECF Nos. 4034, 4035, 4039, 4041, 4044. Other parties filed objections in adversary proceedings. *Despins v. Ogier (In re Kwok)*, Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05012 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 23; *Despins v. FFP (BVI) Ltd. (In re Kwok)*, Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05056 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 36; *Despins v. Apple Inc. (In re Kwok)*, Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05060 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 69; *Despins v. Meta Platforms Inc. (In re Kwok)*, Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05117 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 44; *Despins v. Weddle Law PLLC (In re Kwok)*, Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05188 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 52. Certain parties filed notices of their objections in either the\n\n# Case 22-50073 Doc 4106 Filed 02/14/25 Entered 02/14/25 10:48:15 Page 3 of 5 Case 22-50073 Doc 4177-2 Filed 02/27/25 Entered 02/27/25 15:03:08 Page 3 of 5\n\nOn February 10, 2025, the Trustee filed a list of witnesses and exhibits in advance of the scheduled evidentiary hearing. (ECF No. 4046.)\n\nOn February 11, 2025, an evidentiary hearing was held on the Third Extension Motion (the \"Third Extension Hearing\"). The Trustee testified and was subject to cross-examination during the Third Extension Hearing by several of the Objectors. The parties also advanced their respective arguments during the hearing. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court took the Third Extension Motion under advisement.\n\nHaving considered: (i) the Third Extension Motion and the Objections; (ii) the testimony of the Trustee and the arguments of the parties during the Third Extension Hearing; (iii) the pleadings filed in relation to the First and Second Extension Motions and the testimony of the Trustee and arguments of the parties during the First and Second Extension Hearings; and (iv) matters of which the Court may take judicial notice, the Court finds the Trustee has established cause under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) to grant the Third Extension Motion, which cause includes without limitation: (1) the pendency of the criminal action styled *United States v. Kwok*, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) from March 2023 through the date of the entry of this Order and its impact on these cases and the multitude of related adversary proceedings; (2) Mr. Kwok's ongoing contempt of court and failure to perform his statutory duties under 11 U.S.C. § 521; (3) other parties' ongoing contempt of court; (4) the complexity and extent of Mr. Kwok's financial by affairs; and (5) the Trustee's diligence in his investigation. The Court is unpersuaded by the arguments of the Objectors to the contrary, including without limitation the arguments that: (a)\n\nChapter 11 case, if they filed their objection in an adversary proceeding, or in the adversary proceeding if they filed their objection in the Chapter 11 case. ECF Nos. 4040, 4042; *Despins v. Am. Express Co. (In re Kwok)*, Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05077 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 28.\n\n# Case 22-50073 Doc 4106 Filed 02/14/25 Entered 02/14/25 10:48:15 Page 4 of 5 Case 22-50073 Doc 4177-2 Filed 02/27/25 Entered 02/27/25 15:03:08 Page 4 of 5\n\nthe Objectors will be prejudiced by a further extension of the deadline even though the adversary proceedings pending against all the Objectors were commenced before the First Extension Order entered; and (b) the facts and circumstances of these jointly administered Chapter 11 cases are, at this time, no longer extraordinary. However, the extension of the statutes of limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 granted herein will be the final extension applicable to avoidance actions filed by the Trustee. Any further extensions must be sought upon motion in a pending avoidance action or in a subsequently commenced avoidance action.\n\nAccordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006, it is hereby\n\n**ORDERED:** The Third Extension Motion (ECF No. 4004) is granted as set forth herein; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The time limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549 for the Trustee to commence avoidance actions and other actions on behalf of the estate, as well as for amending any pending complaints, are extended through and including August 15, 2025; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED**: Any additional requests for extension of the statutes of limitations set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 108, 546, and 549, must be made by motion and shall be filed in a specific pending avoidance action or in a subsequently commenced avoidance action; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED:** The Trustee is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief granted herein; and it is further\n\n4\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 4106 Filed 02/14/25 Entered 02/14/25 10:48:15 Page 5 of 5 Case 22-50073 Doc 4177-2 Filed 02/27/25 Entered 02/27/25 15:03:08 Page 5 of 5\n\n**ORDERED:** The Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of this Order.\n\nDated at Bridgeport, Connecticut this 14th day of February, 2025.","body_zh":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT（美国康涅狄格区破产法院）\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，1\n\n债务人。\n\n第 11 章破产案件案号：22-50073 (JAM)（合并审理）\n\n关于：ECF No. 4004\n部分准许受托人延长提起撤销权诉讼期限第三次动议的裁定\n\n2024年2月15日，本法院作出了《关于部分准许延长截止期限动议的决定备忘录与裁定》（简称“第一次延期裁定”）。（ECF No. 2921。）在发出通知并于2024年2月13日举行证据听证会（简称“第一次延期听证会”）后，基于其中所述理由，第一次延期裁定准许了由 Luc A. Despins 先生以 Ho Wan Kwok 先生破产财产的第 11 章受托人（简称“受托人”）身份提起的《请求作出延长受托人提起撤销权诉讼期限裁定的动议》（简称“第一次延期动议”）（ECF No. 2509）。第一次延期裁定将 11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的受托人提起撤销权诉讼的时效期限，从2024年2月15日——即 Kwok 先生自愿提起第 11 章破产申请的两周年之日——延长至2024年8月15日（“第一次延期裁定”，ECF No. 2921）。\n\n1 这些第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及若干其他化名）（税务识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（税务识别号后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为：Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok（仅用于通知与联络目的）。\nCase 22-50073 Doc 4106 Filed 02/14/25 Entered 02/14/25 10:48:15 Page 2 of 5 Case 22-50073 Doc 4177-2 Filed 02/27/25 Entered 02/27/25 15:03:08 Page 2 of 5\n\n2024年7月19日，受托人提交了《关于延长受托人提起撤销权诉讼2024年8月15日截止期限的第一次补充动议》（简称“第二次延期动议”）。（ECF No. 3329。）针对第二次延期动议提出了数项异议。2024年8月13日举行了关于第二次延期动议的证据听证会。在审酌证据听证会前及听证期间提出的主张后，2024年8月14日，法院作出了《准许第二次延期动议的裁定》，将 11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的受托人提起撤销权诉讼的时效期限从2024年8月15日延长至2025年2月15日（“第二次延期裁定”，ECF No. 3417）。2\n\n2025年1月24日，受托人提交了《关于延长受托人提起撤销权诉讼期限的第二次补充动议》（简称“第三次延期动议”）。（ECF No. 4004。）2025年1月27日，法院书记官发出《听证通知》，排定于2025年2月11日就第三次延期动议举行听证会，并将对第三次延期动议提出异议的截止日期设定为2025年2月7日。（ECF No. 4009。）\n\n2025年2月7日，G Club Operations, LLC、Himalaya International Financial Group Limited 及其他附议方、Amazon Web Services, Inc.、Miller Motorcars, Inc.、Ogier、FFP (BVI) Ltd.、Apple Inc.、American Express Company、Meta Platforms, Inc. 以及 Weddle Law PC（统称“异议人”）就第三次延期动议及时提交了异议（简称“异议书”）。3\n\n2 第一次及第二次延期裁定通过援引并入本裁定。\n\n3 若干当事人在 Kwok 先生的第 11 章案件中提交了异议。ECF Nos. 4034, 4035, 4039, 4041, 4044。其他当事人在对抗制诉讼中提交了异议。Despins v. Ogier (In re Kwok), Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05012 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 23; Despins v. FFP (BVI) Ltd. (In re Kwok), Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05056 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 36; Despins v. Apple Inc. (In re Kwok), Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05060 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 69; Despins v. Meta Platforms Inc. (In re Kwok), Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05117 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 44; Despins v. Weddle Law PLLC (In re Kwok), Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05188 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 52。某些当事人在其提交异议的对应程序之外提交了其异议通知，即若在对抗制诉讼中提交异议，则在第 11 章案件中提交通知；若在第 11 章案件中提交异议，则在对抗制诉讼中提交通知。ECF Nos. 4040, 4042; Despins v. Am. Express Co. (In re Kwok), Case No. 22-50073 (JAM), Adv. P. No. 24-05077 (JAM) (Bankr. D. Conn. Feb. 7, 2025), ECF No. 28。\nCase 22-50073 Doc 4106 Filed 02/14/25 Entered 02/14/25 10:48:15 Page 3 of 5 Case 22-50073 Doc 4177-2 Filed 02/27/25 Entered 02/27/25 15:03:08 Page 3 of 5\n\n2025年2月10日，受托人在预定的证据听证会之前提交了证人及证据清单。（ECF No. 4046。）\n\n2025年2月11日，就第三次延期动议举行了证据听证会（简称“第三次延期听证会”）。受托人出庭作证，并在第三次延期听证会期间接受了数名异议人的交叉询问。各方当事人亦在听证会期间提出了各自的主张。在听证会结束时，法院宣布对第三次延期动议进行斟酌审议。\n\n经审酌：(i) 第三次延期动议及异议书；(ii) 受托人的证词及各方当事人在第三次延期听证会期间的主张；(iii) 就第一次及第二次延期动议提交的诉答文书，以及受托人在第一次和第二次延期听证会期间的证词和各方当事人的主张；以及 (iv) 本法院可依职权进行司法认知的事项，本法院认定受托人已依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) 确立了准许第三次延期动议的正当理由，该正当理由包括但不限于：(1) 自2023年3月起至本裁定作出之日止，名为 United States v. Kwok, 23 cr 118 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2024) 的刑事诉讼的未决状态及其对这些案件和大量相关对抗制诉讼的影响；(2) Kwok 先生持续藐视法庭并未能履行其在 11 U.S.C. § 521 项下的法定义务；(3) 其他当事人持续藐视法庭；(4) Kwok 先生财务事务的复杂性与广泛范围；以及 (5) 受托人在其调查中的尽职勤勉。法院未被异议人提出的相反主张所说服，包括但不限于以下主张：(a)\n\n即使针对所有异议人未决的对抗制诉讼均是在第一次延期裁定作出之前提起的，异议人仍会因期限的进一步延长而受到损害；以及 (b) 这些合并审理的第 11 章案件的事实和情况在此时已不再属于特殊情形。然而，本裁定所准许的对 11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的时效期限的延长，将是适用于受托人提起撤销权诉讼的最终一次延期。任何进一步的延期必须在未决的撤销权诉讼中或在随后提起的撤销权诉讼中通过动议提出申请。\n\n据此，依据 Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006，特此\n\n裁定：第三次延期动议（ECF No. 4004）按本裁定所述予以准许；并且进一步\n\n裁定：11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的受托人代表破产财产提起撤销权诉讼及其他诉讼，以及修改任何未决起诉状的时限，延长至并包括2025年8月15日；并且进一步\n\n裁定：任何对 11 U.S.C. §§ 108、546 和 549 规定的时效期限进行延期的额外申请，必须通过动议提出，且应在特定的未决撤销权诉讼中或在随后提起的撤销权诉讼中提交；并且进一步\n\n裁定：本裁定的各项条款和条件在本裁定作出后应立即生效并具有执行力；并且进一步\n\n裁定：受托人获准采取为实现本裁定所准许的救济所必需的一切行动；并且进一步\nCase 22-50073 Doc 4106 Filed 02/14/25 Entered 02/14/25 10:48:15 Page 5 of 5 Case 22-50073 Doc 4177-2 Filed 02/27/25 Entered 02/27/25 15:03:08 Page 5 of 5\n\n裁定：本法院对于因本裁定的解释或执行而产生或与之相关的所有事项保留管辖权。\n\n日期：2025年2月14日，于康涅狄格州布里奇波特。","key_entities":["Kwok","Je","Despins","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Miles Guo","Himalaya","Paul Hastings"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":23,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":28,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":36,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":44,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":52,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":69,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2509,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2921,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3329,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3417,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":4004,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":4009,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":4046,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":4106,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":1466,"status":"published","published_at":"2025-02-14 00:00:00","created_at":"2025-02-14","updated_at":"2026-08-23 12:52:08"}