{"id":"court_ctb_440_15","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":440,"sub_number":15,"doc_type":"EXHIBIT","filed_date":"2022-05-25","title":"EXHIBIT PAX 17 April 26, 2019 Hearing Transcript, *PAX v. Kwok*, Index. No. 652077/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), Dkt. 331","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"# **EXHIBIT PAX 17**\n\nApril 26, 2019 Hearing Transcript, *PAX v. Kwok*, Index. No. 652077/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), Dkt. 331\n\n| 22-50073 | | | | |\n|----------|-----|----------------------------|----|--|\n| IN RE: | | Ho Wan Kwok | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | PAX | | 17 | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | 5/25/2022 Admitted in Full | | |\n| | | P.E. | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n\n1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART: 61 2 -------------------------------------------------------x PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA, 3 Plaintiff, 4 -against-5 HO WAN KWOK, 6 Defendant. 7 --------------------------------------------~----------X Index No. 652077-2017 60 Centre Street 8 New York, New York April 26, 2019 9 10 B E FOR E: 11 HONORABLE BARRY R. OSTRAGER, Justice 12 13 APPEARANCES: 14 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Attorneys for the Plaintiff 15 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036 16 BY: EDWARD MOSS, ESQ. STUART SARNOFF, ESQ.' 17 GARO HOPLAMAZIAN, ESQ. 18 HODGSON RUSS Attorneys for the Defendant 19 605 Third Avenue, Suite 2300 New York, New York 10158 20 BY: JILLIAN MARIE SEARLES, ESQ. MARK A. HARMON, ESQ. 21 22 23 1 24 25 Lisa A. Casey Offic~al Court Reporter I NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 2 of 126\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 3 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n-------,-----------\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE CLERK: This is index number 652071 of 2017 in the matter of ~acific Alliance Asia versus Ho Wan Kwok. Counsel, please note your appearances for the record. THE COURT: Okay. I was previously to~d that you needed an hour to set up this morning, but hlpPilY it only took you no time to set up, so let's probeed. MR. MOSS: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. Good morning. THE CLERK: please note your appearances, counsel. MR. MOSS: Good morning, your Honor. ['m Edward Moss from O'Melveny, for the plaintiff. MR. SARNOFF: Stuart Sarnoff from O'Me~veny for the plaintiff. MR. HOPLAMAZIAN: Garo Hoplamazian from O'Melveny for the plaintiff. MS. SEARLES: Jillian Searles, Hodgson Russ, for the defendant. MR. HARMON: Gdod morning, your Honor. Mark Harmon, Hodgson Russ. THE COURT: Welcome. MR. MOSS: Thank you, your Honor. Gooa morning. I know that the attachment issues have been Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 4 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n-- - -\\_.\\_-----------------,----------\n\n3\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 fully briefed several times, and I know your Honfr is familiar, so I'm going to move through my remarks quickly. THE COURT: Let's put, on the record, everything that the parties have stipulated to, and identify the issues to be tried this morning, on the record. MR. MOSS: Sure. And that's actually in my opening remarks, your Honor. THE COURT: All right. MR. MOSS: But I will start with that. (Whereupon, an exhibit was displayed to the Court. ) MR. MOSS: Your Honor, I was going to start by rev~ew~ng \" wh'at we are try~ng ,. tod*ay,* and a1so prov~I'de a short overview of the four witnesses you will heir from. The first issue is the attachment standard, 6201f2). The parties have stipulated to the first three elements: Cause of action; probability of success; and tha~ the amount demanded from 'the defendant exceeds all klown counterclaims, so we are here -- the first issue here we are from, the attachment issue, is whether or nott there's a grounds for attachment under 6201(3), lnd under 6201(3), that requires us to establish thaJ Mr. Kwok was acting with the intent to defraud cJeditors I\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 5 of 126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\n4\n\nor frustrate a potential judgment in this case in his various attempts to put the apartment out of our reach, and there have been many of those.\n\nThe following slide, this has support our evidence for why we meet the the cases that I legal standard on intent. I thought it would be useful for you to have this handy, but I'm not going to waste time on it.\n\nThis has our evidence, and the evidencl that we will prove today. This is the evidence that Le featured in our briefing, and we'll prove it. I won't go through it now, but I thought it would be helpful to have it issue by issue, in addition to witness b~ witness. I will go through it witness by witnesk.\n\n16 17 18 19 The second ~ssue , we are here to prove asI\" ve~l I piercing. Veil piercing has two elements. Complete I domination and control, and abuse of the corporate form. I don't think there's a serious dispute about thl first one; and the second one, the intent problem will be the focus of our proof today.\n\n20 21 22 Here are the cases that support why our ev~'dence meets the standar.d Aga~n,' th'\"~s ~sJust I for your reference, your Honor, so that you have the~.\n\n23 24 25 I just want to pause on one thing on t~e two standards, the veil piercing standard and the atJachment d d ' h \" 1 stan ar. Ne~t er requ~res us to prove fraud. For the I\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 6 of 126\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\n5\n\nMr. Kwok's translator and assistant. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 first, intent to frustrate a judgment is SUffiCijnt. For the second, the cases say inequity, malfeasance or wrongdoing as to our client is enough. To be clear, your Honor, we are going to prove fraud today. My point is that it's not required for us to do that. This is the veil piercing evidence, same veil piercing evidence we talked about in our brief. It's the veil piercing evidence that we are going to prove up today, and now I'm going to tell you about the fbur witnesses, briefly, and what they are going to tlstifY to today. Ms. Wang will be the first. Ms. Wang is Her testimLny will I demonstrate that in an effort to avoid the attachment, . I Mr. Kwok has gone so far as to suborn perJury. Ms. Want submitted an affidavit. It is Mr. Kwok's princi1al evidence opposing our prior attachment motion. ~hat's . I what he relied on, and she swore to facts about which she had absolutely no knowledge. Zero knowledge. We'll prove that today. Ms. Wang, will also confirm that Mr. Kwok was not telling the truth about two key issues. Number one, his pledges of the apartment, and remember I ' encumbrance is part of the standard under the CPLR. I Number two, the efforts to sell. I'm sure Mr. Harmon is I\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\ngoing to say what could be more public in the w~ole .world; right? You put this expensive apartment rn the market. Well, if he did, then why is he denying the fact that he received an offer in counter?\n\n5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next up is Mr. Ullman. Mr. Ullman is the' Sherry-Netherland Executive vice President and cia' He will testify that during the approval process, M~. Kwok showed the Sherry-Netherland no assets in the u.l. and no assets in his own name. That's never happene6 at the 11' .f h' . I hotel. Mr. U man w~ll also test~ y t at us~ng rwo LLC's, a foreign LLC on top of a'New York LLC, tr buy an apartment in that building, which is exactly whar Mr. Kwok said he did, has never happened before it the hotel either, and because of this, Mr. Ullman wiQl explain that the. Sherry-Netherland put in unprecldented safeguards, like the biggest security deposit evlr, because they were very concerned, based on the structure, that if Mr. Kwok defaulted on his monthly obligations, they would have to chase him across the globe, and he was showing no assets.\n\n21 22 23 24 25 We respectfully submit that we are similarly situated. We are going to get a judgment here, lnd we need similar safeguards attached for the same relsons. I Mr. Ullman will also testify that Mr. Kwok tried to assign, transfer, the apartment to a trLst in I\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n6\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\n7\n\nhis son's name. Mr. Kwok denies having any memory of I that. Secrecy and asset transfer is something that helps us meet the standard. Since Mr. Kwok denibs it, we have Mr. Ullman here to talk about it, and thlre's documentary evidence.\n\n6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Finally, Mr. Ullman will also testify about misrepresentations that Mr. Kwok and his represehtatives made to the Sherry-Netherland about the pledges. They represented to you that the apartment was pledgea. They had a big problem, because that breached their lbase . I agreement with the Sherry-Netherland, so when the Sherry-Netherland saw their papers and said, Heyl you pledged the apartment they said, No, no. We nevlr told , h b ' d,l Just~ce Ostrager t at. You must e m~srea ~ng our papers. False. We'll prove it.\n\n16 Mr. Horvitz is next. Mr. Horvitz will testify 17 18 briefly by video. board president. He's the Sherry-Netherland CE0 and He lives in Cleveland. We depised him 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 there two weeks ago. He reviewed the financial information that Mr. Kwok provided to the Sherry-Netherland to induce the hotel to approve his application, and Mr. Horvitz relied on that financial information in recommending the board approval. That information included financials of two companies Mr. Kwok said he owned.\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 9 of\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\n------------------------.---------\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 As you will see, your Honor, we showed Mr. Horvitz Mr. Kwok's deposition testimony, just the publicly available excerpts, where Mr. Kwok denibd having any ownership interests in those entities that he told the Sherry-Netherland he owned. His testimony directly contradicted what he told the Sherry-Netherland, and as the person to whom the misrepresentations were made, Mr. Horvitz will tell you h k h b . . I t at Mr. Kwo must ave een m~srepresent~ng to someone. He either lied at his deposition, or he defraude~ the Sherry-Netherland. There is no third option. Ahd Mr. Horvitz, your Honor, not I, actually used thl word defrauded.\n\n14 15 Finally, Mr. Kwok dominates we'll have Mr. Kwok. We'll show that and controls the Genever entihies. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 We'll show that he made repeated and significant misrepresentations to the Court in an effort to defeat the attachment motion; we'll show that he made mlterial misrepresentations to the Sherry-Netherland to ihduce it I to allow him to purchase; and we'll show that the money for the apartment may well have come from the shill company that is responsible for paying the debt ~o our client, that Mr. Kwok unconditionally guaranteedl It certainly didn't come from Genever, which was thi supposed purchaser. Importantly, your Honor, we are\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n8\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n----------------------,---------\n\ngoing to demonstrate that Mr. Kwok will not and cannot pay a judgment in this case without an attachmenl.\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Now, we have teed up a few short clips for the opening, about seven minutes in total, of testimony that I would like to play from Mr. Kwok's deposition, which we.'re entitled to do under CPLR 3117 (a) (2): \"The deposition testimony of a party may be used for lny purpose by any party who was adversely interestek when h 0 '\" Tho 0 0 t l t e test~mony was g~ven. ~s ~s ~mportant tes ~mony, . your Honor, with an important purpose: Mr. Kwok will be here later -- he is here now -- and he will be on his best behavior in the public courtroom, but that' slnot what happened at the deposition. Your Honor, Mrl Kwok was evasive, he made a mockery of the proCeedingl and we I prepared the video, and we are entitled to show it so that the Court can see what we are really dealin~ with here.\n\n18 19 20 21 22 23 New York caselaw makes clear that evasiveness and misrepresenta~ions throughout Court proceedibgs is a I factor the court can consider, and after seeing this, I think the Court will agree that it's hard to ima~ine I stronger, more direct and significant evidence of evasiveness.\n\n24 25 Mr. Kwok has filed 17 or so lawsuits since he's been in this country. He knows exactly how the\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 11 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n10\n\n| 1 | legal
process
works,
and
he
cooperates
when
he
is
the |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | plaintiff,
but
you
need
to
see
what
he
does
whei
we
are |\n| 3 | asking
him
questions
and
he
is
the
defendant.
We'll |\n| 4 | play
the
clips. |\n| 5 | This
is
the
first
clip.
I
asked
Mr.
Kwok
-- |\n| 6 | he
told
me
he
didn't
communicate
by
email,
so
I
laid, |\n| 7 | did
you
search
text
messages
to
try
to
respond
tL
our |\n| 8 | request
in
this
case?
And
this
is
how
he
answerld
me. |\n| 9 | (Video
tape
played.) |\n| 10 | MR.
MOSS:
I
also
tried
to
ask
Mr.
Kwok
some |\n| 11 | basic
questions.
There
were
significant
scoping |\n| 12 | objections,
and
they
wouldn't
let
me
ask
any
questions |\n| 13 | about
the
merits,
and
so
I
was
trying
to
understlnd
that |\n| 14 | he
understood
we
were
here
to
talk
about
the
attlchment |\n| 15 | I
issues,
and
here
is
what
happened
when
I
asked
that |\n| 16 | question. |\n| 17 | (Video
tape
played.\") |\n| 18 | MR.
MOSS:
One
of
the
topics
they
did
!let
me |\n| 19 | I
ask
about
was
the
Genever
entities,
the
two
shel!l. |\n| 20 | entities
that
Kwok
set
up
to
buy
the
apartment.
He
owns |\n| 21 | and
controls
those
two
entities,
and
he
was
also
the |\n| 22 | corporate
representative
for
both,
so
if
for
some
reason
\"
I |\n| 23 | he
didn't
know
anything
about
the
entities
that
he |\n| 24 | himself
set
up
--
which
of
course
he
did,
becausl
they |\n| 25 | I
are
him,
he
is
they
--
he
had
a
duty
to
educate
himself
I |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 12 of 126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n19\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nabout that, and here is what happened when I asked him simple questions on those topics.\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\n4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MR. MOSS: Your Honor, we talked brief[y, in our briefs -- excuse me, we talked extensively ib our briefs about counsel's instructions. to Mr. Kwok fO not answer questions at the deposition that were plaQnly relevant. The standard is whether he intends to frustrate the judgment. I asked him, will you pay if Court orders a judgment, and they instructed him not to answer that question. There was no agreement to not answer questions like that. It was completely inappropriate. It's terrible for them. They fought me to not play it for you today, so I'm not going tl play it, to avoid the fight, but I think you do need bo see that there were many times during the deposition where Mr. Kwok just refused to answer on his own without, even, an instruction, inappropriate or not.\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\n20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. MOSS: Finally, your Honor, the last one, I on the prior attachment motion we quoted a YouTube d ' , d' l' I au 10. It was Just an au 10 c 1p on YouTube that had a , \" ,I capt10n saY1ng 1t was Mr. Kwok's V01ce, and Mr. Kwok I supposedly was instructing his associates to seli certain assets quickly and quietly. They killed us in\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n11\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 13 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n| 12 |\n|----|\n\n| 1 | their
opposition
papers.
They
took
to
us
to
task.
They |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | Mr.
KwbklS
said
PAX
doesn't
even
know
whether
that's |\n| 3 | voice.
They
don't
know
whether
or
not
this
is |\n| 4 | authentic.
So
I
thought
maybe
in
his
deposition,
I |\n| 5 | would
ask
him.
I
played
the
audio
and
asked
him,
Hey, |\n| 6 | is
that
you?
Since
they
disputed
authenticity,
[ |\n| 7 | thought
it
was
a
pretty
fair
question.
And
here
is
what |\n| 8 | happened
then. |\n| 9 | (Video
tape
played.) |\n| 10 | MR.
MOSS:
Thank
you,
your
Honor.
We
iook |\n| 11 | forward
to
putting
our
case
on
today. |\n| 12 | MR.
HARMON:
Good
morning,
your
Honor. |\n| 13 | So
the.first
question
that
you
asked
was
what |\n| 14 | we
agreed
to,
what
we
stipulated
to,
and
just
to
be |\n| 15 | clear,
we
did
stipulate
that
for
the
purposes
of
this |\n| 16 | motion,
that
the
defendants
do
not
have
to
prove
that |\n| 17 | they're
likely
to
succeed
on
the
merits.
We
have
also |\n| 18 | stipulated
on
a
number
of
exhibits
that
have
beeh |\n| 19 | presented
in
a
book
to
you.
There
are
some
we
hive |\n| 20 | I
objections,
but
there
are
a
passel
of
exhibits
tfat
we |\n| 21 | have
stipulated
are
authentic
and
relevant
and
should
be |\n| 22 | I
admitted
into
evidence
We
have
stipulated
as
to |\n| 23 | various
transcripts
and
portions
of
transcripts,
and
of |\n| 24 | course
we
also
have
disagreement
about
the
trans€ript |\n| 25 | readings
and
the
exhibits,
which
we
can
get
to
dlring
I |\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n1 the hearing.\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n2 But your Honor, I don't have a multi-media 3 presentation. I haven't diced the transcript or the 4 testimony of the depositions in order to provide you clips that sound good. We have presented to you~ Honor the transcripts; their designated readings, our bross , I, designations, for completeness, and I would ask fhat your Honor, after the hearing today, read those [or the 9 full context. I think one of the prime examples is the last clip that you saw, where they say that Mr. Kwok put his fingers in his ears and refused to talk aboub it, to answer the question, but if you read the whole akswer what he is saying is, I challenge it toauthentibity. This is not real. Tell me. Show me that this ib my , , I voice. I don't believe it. Don't play me somebody I else's voice. So that's really all that I have to say 17 about that.\n\n18 I have read with care, I believe, your Honor's 19 20 21 admonitions, expressions of what evidence you want to hear at hearing. This the third time that we arl before your Honor on the attachment motion, and I hope !hat the the evidence that they have 1n. t h'e1r two mot10ns; . t,.at 1 at today, we are going to ~ear some point, at some time already submitted to you today's presentation by plaintiffs will not just ,be a regurgitation of all of 22 24 23 25\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\nI\n\n13\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\nanswers to the questions that you have raised abrut Mr. Kwok's intent in purchasing the apartment, and efforts to sell the apartment, why that's happening, and why that's no longer happening.\n\nThe plaintiff's asked us if we would agree to accept a subpoena from Mr. Kwok to be here. today, and we said that isn't necessary. We will have Mr Kwok here ans 'wer alny , and Mr. Kwok will appear voluntarily and questions you have from the witness stand that wl don't object to and which you don't sustain, and you cln hear I from Mr. Kwok exactly why he bought the apartment and what he has done with the apartment, and your Hohor, if the plaintiffs don't ask Mr. Kwok those questionb, I will.\n\n15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Mr. Kwok is not an American Citizen. Mr. Kwok did not grow up in the United States. Mr. Kwok krew up in China, in Hong Kong. He is here seeking aSYlhm from the Chinese Government. He has been the SUbject[ he and his family, his extended family in China, have blen the subject of extensive efforts by the Chinese commtnist , '1 h I Government to )a1 t em, abuse them, challenge them, because the communist government does not like wlat Mr. Kwok has to say about corruption and freedom in China.\n\n25 We have a language barrier here. Mr. Kwok\n\nI\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n15\n\ndoes not read English, and one the exhibits that has been submitted to you on consent is the contract of sale to purchase the apartment in the Sherry-Netherland. I . It's in English. It's not signed by Mr. Kwok, because I . he can't read English. He doesn't understand, or didn't . I understand, coming to this country, the concept of cooperative ownership, and his understanding of ownership is based upon his years and years business developer in China. That's how he the concept of family and ownership. of bjing a understands\n\n11 You can ask him a question of the 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 understanding of what u.S. -- what Americans think about ownership, and you can translate that to him and you can get his answer back, and it will be in English, and you've got a great sound bite, but what I would iSk your . I Honor to do is to recognize, when Mr. Kwok testifies, that there is not just a language issue, but thele is also a cultural issue here that needs to be undelstood in the context of what Mr. Kwok has said, and whit he has done.\n\n21 22 23 24 25 We didn't bring discovery issues to yom before the hearing, and I don't believe this is the pro~er time to raise discovery issues. If there were proble~s with the way we handled objections, or we handled the production of documents, we should have handled trhat in I\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n\n**Proceedings**\n\n16\n\n| 1 | a
meet
and
confer,
resolving
it
with
the
Court
on |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | discovery
issues.
We
didn't
do
that.
So
I
belilve
that |\n| 3 | you
what
are
going
to
hear
today
from
the
Plaintlffs, |\n| 4 | based
on
this
presentation,
is
a
reiteration
and |\n| 5 | re-introduction
of
everything
that
they
have
already |\n| 6 | said
twice,
in
two
sets
of
motions.
I
hope
that
that's |\n| 7 | not
going
to
be
what
we
do
today.
I
hope
we
are
going |\n| 8 | to
get
to
some
real
evidence
that
addresses
the |\n| 9 | questions
that
your
Honor
has,
and
I
tell
you,
your |\n| 10 | d
I
1
0
Honor,
that
if
the
p
a~nt~ffs
don't
~t
as
part
of |\n| 11 | their
case,
I
will
ask
Mr.
Kwok
on
my
opportunit~
to |\n| 12 | cross
examine
him. |\n| 13 | Thank
you. |\n| | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
I
just
want
to
respond |\n| 15 | to
a
couple,
very,
very
briefly.
First,
in
terml
of
the |\n| 16 | evidence,
you
asked
us
-- |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
We
should
just
proceed
with
the |\n| 18 | testimony. |\n| 19 | MR.
MOSS:
Let's
go.
Perfect.
Thank
you, |\n| 20 | your
Honor. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
We
argued
motions
twice
before. |\n| 22 | MR.
MOSS:
Fair
enough,
your
Honor
wl
call |\n| 23 | our
first
witness,
Yvette
Wang. |\n| 24 | |\n| 25 | |\n| | |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 18 of 126\n\n| | 17
Wang.
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | Y
A
N
PIN
G
WAN
G,
having
been
duly
sworn
by
the |\n| 2 | clerk,
was
examined
and
testified
as
follows: |\n| 3 | THE
CLERK:
In
a
loud,
clear
voice,
please |\n| 4 | state
your
full
name
and
address. |\n| 5 | THE
WITNESS:
My
name
is
Wang,
Yan
Ping.
My |\n| 6 | address
is
22D
150
East
57th
Street,
New
York,
N~W
York. |\n| 7 | THE
CLERK:
Thank
you.
Be
seated. |\n| 8 | I
THE
WITNESS:
Thank
you,
sir. |\n| 9 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
The
witness
is
sworn,
your |\n| 10 | Honor. |\n| 11 | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
I
have
a
copy
of |\n| 12 | Ms.
Wang's
deposition
transit.
Is
it
okay
if
I
lpproach |\n| 13 | and
provide
it
to
her? |\n| 14 | Thank
you. |\n| 15 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the |\n| 16 | witness.
) |\n| 17 | DIRECT
EXAMINATION |\n| 18 | BY
MR.
MOSS: |\n| 19 | Ms.
Wang,
you
work
for
Mr.
Kwok;
right?
Q |\n| 20 | A
I
work
for
whole
family. |\n| 21 | Mr.
Kwok's
family?
Q |\n| 22 | A
No.
Guo
Family.
G-U-O. |\n| 23 | What's
Mr.
Kwok's
name?
Q |\n| 24 | A
Kwok
Ho
Wan. |\n\nQ Guo; right? The same Guo, the .family name?\n\n25\n\n18 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 A He is family. His name is Kwok, K-W-O-K. His 2 family is, Guo, G-U-O. 3 Q Do you dispute that you work for Mr. Kwok's family 4 5 6 7 businesses? A Let me explain. Mr. Guo, Guo Family, his family has more than hundred people, including his seven -- ~ I believe total, including himself -- seven brothers, and they 8 have their different, like, family, small family. So 9 totally, together, there are more than one hundred people in 10 the family. So this family, different family member, they 11 have their different parts in the family business. So I work 12 for the whole family. 13 14 15 Q A Q One of the members of the family is Mr. Kwok? Yeah. He is one of the family member. You worked for Mr. Kwok's family companies in Hong 16 Kong; right? 17 l8 A Q Yes. since February 2018, you work for one of his family 19 companies in New York; right? 20 A Yes. 21 22 Q So, since 2009, so for the had no other employer other than the last 10 years, y0u have Guo Family; righ~? 23 24 A Q Correct. I would like to talk about Mr. Kwok's efforts to 25 sell the apartment. Up until recently, you know that Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n126\n\n#### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 Mr. Kwok's broker was Kathy Sloane; right? 19 2 3 A Q Correct. You, on behalf of Mr. Kwok, had discussions with 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 Ms. Sloane about selling the apartment; right? A Let me correct. I am the contact person berween Mr. Kwok and Ms. Kathy Sloane, because Mr. Kwok, he dies not read and write English at all, so that's why Ms. KathV Sloane, a lot of time, reach out to me asking me to sknd her message to Mr. Kwok, and then because Mr. Kwok, he dols not write and read English, so I have to translate for hil and put his message, like, translate into English, and sehd back to Ms. Kathy Sloane. 13 14 Q A Understood. Thank you for the clarification. Thank you. 15 16 17 Q And sometimes you have exchanged emails with . I Ms. Wang on -- excuse me, w~th Ms. Sloane on behalf of Mr. Kwok about efforts to sell the apartment; right? 18 19 20 A Correct. MR. MOSS: If I may, your Honor? (Whereupon, a document was handed to tme 21 22 23 24 witness. ) (Whereupon, an exhibit was displayed to the Court. ) MR. MOSS: PX 17, which in evidence. 25 Q Ms. Wang, this is an email from Ms. Sloane ~n I Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 21 of\n\n| | by
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Moss | 20 |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------|\n| 1 | November
of
2016;
right? | |\n| 2 | A
Correct. | |\n| 3 | There's
an
email
address,
Yvette
Wong,
or
Q | |\n| 4 | Yvette.yue423
at
GMail;
right? | |\n| 5 | Correct.
A | |\n| 6 | That's
your
email.
address?
Q | |\n| 7 | A
It
was
my
email
address,
but
now
I
cannot
get | in |\n| 8 | there
because
my
a
lot
email
address,
they
were
habked | by |\n| 9 | Chinese
Communist
Party,
so
I
do
not
have
access
any | lore. |\n| 10 | Sorry. | |\n| 11 | Excuse
me.
I'm
sorry
for
almost
cutting
you
Q | off. |\n| 12 | At
the
time,
this
was
your
email
address? | |\n| 13 | Correct.
A | |\n| 14 | And
you
sent
and
received
these
emails?
Q | |\n| 15 | Correct.
A | |\n| 16 | I
would
like
to
direct
your
attention
to
the
Q | \"Dear |\n| 17 | Miles\"
email
on
the
bottom
of
the
page. | |\n| 18 | It
says,
\"I
have
been
giving
a
lot
of
thought | to |\n| 19 | the
offer
that
--\"
name
redacted
\"--
that
someone
has | put |\n| 20 | forward
for
your
apartment
at
the
Sherry-Netherland.\" | |\n| 21 | Do
you
see
that? | |\n| 22 | A
Yes. | |\n| 23 | In
or
around
this
time,
someone
had
put
forth
Q | an. |\n| 24 | offer
on
the
apartment;
right? | |\n| 25 | From
the
email.
Yes.
A | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n126\n\n| | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | Q
Well,
you
knew
that.
That
email
refreshed
¥our |\n| 2 | recollection
that
there
was
a
\\$60
million
offer
on
thb
table; |\n| 3 | right? |\n| 4 | A
Correct. |\n| 5 | Q
It
says,
\"I'm
sensitive
to
the
fact
that
you
have |\n| 6 | '
'f'~cant
concess~on'h
d
I
aIready
rnade
a
very
s~gn~
w
en
you
agree
to |\n| 7 | I
counter
at
67
million;\"
right?
I
read
that
correctly? |\n| 8 | This
is
from
Ms.
Kathy
Sloane,
her
email.
A |\n| 9 | Right.
And
what
she
was
saying
was
that
Mr.
Kwok
Q |\n| 10 | countered
the
offer;
right?
You
know
that? |\n| 11 | I
don't
know
about
this.
A |\n| 12 | You
don't
know
whether
or
not
Mr.
Kwok
countered
Q |\n| 13 | the
offer? |\n| 14 | A
Correct. |\n| 15 | Q
Okay.
And
she
said,
at
the
top,
\"Dear
Yvette, |\n| 16 | Do
please
read
to
this
Miles
at
your
earliest
conveniencl.\" |\n| 17 | you
see
that? |\n| 18 | Do
you
see
that
portion,
\"Dear
Yvette,
please
read |\n| 19 | this
to
Mil<;!sat
your
earliest
convenience\"? |\n| 20 | Which
page?
A |\n| 21 | See
that
portion,
\"Please
read
this
to
Miles
at
Q |\n| 22 | your
earliest
convenience\"? |\n| 23 | Yes.
I
saw
this.
A |\n| 24 | And
Miles
is
Mr.
Kwok;
right?
Q |\n| 25 | A
Correct. |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n#### 21 of 125\n\n| | 22
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | You
read
it
to
him;
right?
Q |\n| 2 | Yes,
I
did.
A |\n| 3 | And
I
want
to
be
very,
very
clear
about
this
for.
Q |\n| 4 | I
the
Court,
this
one.
Mr.
Kwok
knew
about
this
\\$60
mi~lion |\n| 5 | offer;
right? |\n| 6 | A
Yes. |\n| 7 | You
have
no
doubt
about
that;
right?
Q |\n| 8 | A
Mr.
Kwok
knew
that
from
Ms.
Kathy
Sloane,
and
this |\n| 9 | is
why
I
say
I
do
not
know,
because
this
is,
I
gathertd
some |\n| 10 | information,
or
obtained
information,
which
means
either |\n| 11 | Ms.
Kathy
Sloane
told
me,
or
emailed
me.
Then
I
saw
hhe |\n| 12 | email.
I
said,
Oh,
okay
There
is
an
offer,
like
thts
way. |\n| 13 | Or
Mr.
Kwok
told
me.
So
that's
why,
when
both
of
them |\n| 14 | d'1SCUSS
,
there,
th\"1S
gatI h'ered
or
ment1on,
I
was
not
so
1S
my |\n| 15 | of
obtained
information,
not
my
personal
information.
So |\n| 16 | this
is.not
my
personal
information. |\n| 17 | When
you
ask
me,
do
you
know |\n| 18 | I'm
just
a
messenger
between
these
two |\n| 19 | have
that
personal
information.
I
just
gathered
that |\n| 20 | information
from
either
Ms.
Kathy
Sloane
or
Mr.
Kwok.
I'm |\n| 21 | just
a
messenger. |\n| 22 | Q
Right.
You
passed
the
message
to
Mr.
Kwok
about |\n| 23 | I
the
\\$60
million
offer
that
Kathy
Sloane
told
you
about. |\n| 24 | I
did.
A |\n| 25 | Right.
And
Mr.
Kwok
knew
about
the
offer.
Q |\n\n------------------------.----------\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n| | | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff | -
Direct
by
Moss | 23 | |\n|--------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--|\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Doc 440-15 | Filed 05/25/22
126 | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 24 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 | |\n\n| | | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss | 23 |\n|----|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|\n| 1 | A | Correct. | |\n| 2 | Q | You
know
you
submitted
an
affidavit
in
this | case? |\n| 3 | A | Yes. | |\n| 4 | Q | You
did
that
on
behalf
of
Mr.
Kwok;
right? | |\n| 5 | A | I
did
that
on
behalf
of
Golden
Spring
New
York | and |\n| 6 | the
Guo | Family,
yes. | |\n| 7 | Q | Well,
you
did
that
in
support
of
Mr.
Kwok's | |\n| 8 | opposition | to
our
motion
to
attach
his
apartment. | |\n| 9 | A | Yes. | |\n| 10 | Q | Right? | |\n| 11 | A | Yes. | |\n| 12 | Q | Let's
take
a
look
at
the
affidavit. | |\n| 13 | | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the | |\n| 14 | witness. | ) | |\n| 15 | | (Whereupon,
an
exhibit
was
displayed
to | the |\n| 16 | Court. | ) | |\n| 17 | | MR~
MOSS:
This
is
PX
34. | |\n| 18 | Q | This
is
your
affidavit;
right,
Ms.
Wang? | |\n| 19 | A | Correct. | |\n| 20 | Q | In
this
case? | |\n| 21 | A | Yes. | |\n| 22 | | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
it's
not
in
evimence. | |\n| 23 | They | have
an
objection
to
it.
I
offer
it.
It's | not
for |\n| 24 | | the.truth. | |\n| 25 | | MS.
SEARLES:
There
are
actually
a
few | key |\n| | | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n# **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n11\n\n24\n\nissues with this particular exhibit. One of the exhibits, exhibit C to it, is subject to a stipu~ation on the merits, and we have had an ongoing discuslion with respect to the pledge issue. Your Honor make clear that the pledge had nothing to do with whether ol not attachment would be had; it just had to do with priority. I have no problem with them using impeachment. It's obviously in front of the a pleading, but I don't think it is a proper be admitted into evidence. That's the issue have. this as I , Court, J.t's exhl'b' iL J.tto I that I\n\n12 13 MR. MOSS: Your Honor, it relevance objection, which, I think sounds like a I your Honor can take 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 it for what it's worth. It's obviously in front of the Court. We can pause on the pledge for one issue, because I think that's going to come up a lot tohay. The pledges, 6201(3) talks about encumbering an lsset I with an intent to frustrate a judgment. The casjs say that a pledge is an encumbrance. They put this issue in front of you. They said, We pledged it, so you ban't attach it. You denied that argument, because thlt's a f \" b h ' . I matter 0 prJ.orJ.ty, ut t ey're trYJ.ng to tWJ.st that rule and say the pledges are off the table, and !hey are not relevant for this. It's in the CPLR, and thl misrepresentations about the pledges go straight to the\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 26 of 126\n\n25 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 fraudulent intent, so it couldn't be more relevant. It's evidence they put in front of her. THE COURT: You have a witness on the ritness stand. You can ask the witness any questions you want to ask the witness. To the extent that the witnbss has .. . h\" . I . h g~ven pr~or to sworn test~mony t at ~s ~ncons~stent w~t the testimony that she lives gives today, you cah use the affidavit for impeachment purposes, so there's really no need to introduce the affidavit as evidence, because she is here. You can ask her anything ybu want. THE WITNESS: Thank you. 12 13 14 Q A Q Let's take look at the affidavit, Ms. Wang. Yes. You submitted the affidavit in support of the 15 opposition to the attachment motion; right? 16 17 18 19 A Q A Q Correct. You understood this was a legal document? Yes, I do. You understood it was being used in a legal 20 proceeding? 21 22 A Q Yes, I do. And you knew it was going to be submitted here in 23 Supreme Court to Justice Ostrager; right? 24 A Yes. I learn that. I'm still learning. . 25 Q You understood that this wasn't just a casual I Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 27 of\n\n\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n#### 26 of 125\n\n# **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n27\n\n| 1 | A
This
affidavit
was
drafted
by
attorney,
so
a
lot
of |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | information,
what
I
can
see,
because
I
am
here,
the |\n| 3 | administrator
and
President
of
Golden
Spring
New
York,
the |\n| 4 | administrator,
which
I
knew
that
I
am
the
documents
or |\n| 5 | I .
information
gather
people.
I
try
collect
the
documents,
get |\n| 6 | information.
So
all
of
this
information
in
here,
the~'re
not |\n| 7 | I
my
personal
knowledge,
because
I
was
not
involved
in
any
of |\n| 8 | the
things
in
here,
so
I'm
trying
to
help
to
gather |\n| 9 | information
and
documents
from
different
people. |\n| 10 | Q
Ms.
Wang,
you
sworn
to
the
Court
that
Mr.
Kwok |\n| 11 | I
owned
the
apartment;
right?
And
he
owned
it
through
another |\n| 12 | entity;
right? |\n| 13 | MS.
SEARLES:
Objection.
Leading. |\n| 14 | THE
COURT:
That's
overruled. |\n| 15 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
You
can
answer. |\n| 16 | THE
WITNESS:
I
can
answer.
Okay. |\n| 17 | In
A
this
affidavit,
swear,
yes.
I
yes. |\n| 18 | And
you
don't
know
if
Mr.
Kwok
owns
the
apartment
Q |\n| 19 | or
not;
right? |\n| 20 | A
When
you
say
I
don't
know,
I
don't
understand, |\n| 21 | you're
talking
about
my
personal
knowledge?
Which
I
hon't |\n| 22 | know,
because
personally,
when
this
apartment
was
purlhased, |\n| 23 | or
happened
afterwards,
especially
when
it
was
purchabed,
I |\n| 24 | was
not
in
the
U.S.
and
I
did
not
involve,
handle, |\n| 25 | communicate
or
negotiate,
attend
any
meeting
at
all.
So
I
do |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 29 of 126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n| 1 | not
have
any
personal
knowledge
about
that.
This
all,
is
I |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | when
I
was
requested,
I
have
to
start
to
ask
the
peopll.e; |\n| 3 | gather
information;
collect
information
from
other
pebple. |\n| 4 | MR.
MOSS:
Let's
play
the
deposition. |\n| 5 | (Video
tape
played.) |\n| 6 | You
never
saw
a
single
paper
about
the
ownership
of
Q |\n| 7 | the
apartment;.
right? |\n| 8 | I
did
saw
paper
about
this
ownership
since
this
A |\n| 9 | case
started.
So
the
attorney
asked
my
help
.to
go
to
look |\n| 10 | for
documents.
I
did
see
some
documents. |\n| 11 | (Whereupon,
an
exhibit
was
displayed
to
the |\n| 12 | Court.
) |\n| 13 | THE
COURT:
Look,
without
the
slide,
you're |\n| 14 | going
to
ask
her
if
she
knows
whether
Mr.
Kwok
oLns
the |\n| 15 | i
If
I h
apartment.
She
either
does
or
she
doesn't.
e
says |\n| 16 | she
doesn't
know,
and
she
previously
swore
that
he
did |\n| 17 | own
the
apartment,
then
you
can
impeach
her.
If
she |\n| 18 | says
that
he
doesn't
own
the
apartment,
and
she |\n| 19 | previously
sworn
that
he
does
own
the
apartment,
then |\n| 20 | you
can
impeach
her,
but
all
we
are
doing
now
is |\n| 21 | eliciting
her
testimony. |\n| 22 | Ms.
Wang,
you
just
testified
that
you
did
n0t
know
Q |\n| 23 | I
that
Mr.
Kwok
owned
the
apartment,
and
I'm
going
to
direct |\n| 24 | your
attention
to
paragraph
two
of
your
affidavit. |\n| 25 | MS.
SEARLES:
Objection.
That
misstates
her
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 30 of\n\n**Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** testimony. THE COURT: Okay. Look ,.do you know whether Mr. Kwok owns the 126\n\n29\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 apartment? Yes or no. THE WITNESS: Yes, sir. THE COURT: And does he own the apartment? THE WITNESS: I heard, still. I heard, and via a different entity, and different entity own the apartment, and he owns, like, different entity. This is what I learned from the whole document. THE COURT: You have no personal knowledge -- THE WITNESS: No. THE COURT: -- one way or the other? THE WITNESS: No, your Honor. Yeah. THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead. Q Ms. Wang, do I have it right that you just said you did see papers about the ownership of the apartment? A Correct. Q Take a look at your deposition, page 78. THE COURT: That's not how we do this. We have lots of motion papers. If you are going to use a deposition for impeachment, you say, Do you recall being deposed, Do you recall being asked the following questions and giving the following answers, and that comes into the record, and if it constitutes\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 31 of\n\n126\n\n30 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 impeachment, I'll take pote of that. If it's of no 2 moment, I'll ignore it. 3 Q Ms. Wang, do you recall that I deposed you? 4 A Yes. That was you, sir. 5 Q I'm going to read: 6 \"Question: Who do you think of as the owner 7 of the apartment? 8 \"Answer: I don't know, because I never see 9 any paper in front of me, so I don't know. It's all I 10 heard from him, but -I don't know.\" 11 Do you recall being asked that question and giving 12 that answer? 13 A Yes, I did. 14 Q Any statement you made about the apartment's 15 ownership would just be a guess; right? A have personal information; okay? deposed by you, sir, I was .super nervous. time sit in front of your Honor and this Court. Let me explain, sir. So all the information about I this apartment, which is my gathered information, I do not I So second, when I was I I have to say, I even now, I'm still very nervous, because this is my first So wLen I I was deposed by you, sir, I was very nervous, and my memory somehow come into, like, a blank, totally blank. ver~ - . I important is that English is not even my second language. My first language is Chinese Mandarin, so my second langlage, I 23 25 24 21 20 22 19 18 17 16\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n1 foreign language, is French, and I'm learning English, so a 2 lot of, like, language barrier happen.\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n3 So when I was deposed by you, sir, I was super 4 nervous, and you give me, I remember, some documents, like 5 6 7 8 something which I can show, have difficulty to read all paper in front of you, sir. nervous. like this kind of documents, I of this technical legal flna~cial I So that's why I was super\n\n9 10 11 12 13 14 And then, by the way, I remember you did not show me my affidavit when you deposed me; right? You did hot show me this, and you just showed me this (indicating). sl then I was given that, I was shaking my hands. I tried to rlad all of them, and plus these documents, I just collect froL other people. So that's why I try to give you an answer, llke, in 15 a very limited time. I don't want to waste any other 16 people's .time. So when I could not recognize, and I'm not 17 sure, I just say I don't know.\n\n18 19 But basically, this case, and I am only I'm a very conservative peoPle in able to be responsible for my 20 personal knowledge. If you know, this is my gathered 21 information, my gathered knowledge, or just documents pass by 22 my hands. I was super nervous, just like right now. I 23 probably say, sir, I don't know, I don't remember. Yeah. 24 That's my situation when you deposed me, sir. 25 Q Page 78 of the deposition:\n\n| | --------
-- -------------,---------~
INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
Page 33 of |\n|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 32 |\n| | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n| 1 | \"Question:
Do
you
think
he
owns
it? |\n| 2 | \"Answer:
I
don't
know.
I
cannot
guess.\" |\n| 3 | Do
you
recall
being
asked
that
question
and
giving |\n| 4 | that
answer? |\n| 5 | Yes,
sir.
A |\n| 6 | Q
And
you
know
that
your
counsel
refused
having
a |\n| 7 | translator
at
the
deposition;
right?
Even
though
we
lSked
if |\n| 8 | you
needed
one
at
the
deposition? |\n| 9 | MS.
SEARLES:
No.
Objection.
Just
for |\n| 10 | clarification,
we
did
not
refuse. |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
Look |\n| 12 | MS.
SEARLES:
The
witness
requested
that
she |\n| 13 | didn't
need
one. |\n| 14 | THE
COURT:
All
the
arguments
that
you
have, |\n| 15 | each
of
you,
have
been
memorialized
in
extensive |\n| 16 | findings.
I
don't
want
to
hear
any
arguments
about |\n| 17 | l't
h.lng.
I'
hear
and
I
I
anyt
Just
want
to
testlmony
want |\n| 18 | to
be
elicited
in
an
ordinary
and
expeditious
falhion. |\n| i9 | So
all
we
have
accomplished
in
the
last
15
minutls
is |\n| 20 | that
this
witness
has
indicated
that
she
has
no
lersonal |\n| 21 | 0
concernlng'
the
h'lp
f
th'lS
I
know
1edge
owners
apartment. |\n| 22 | That's
what
she
testified
to
at
her
deposition,
lnd |\n| 23 | that's
what
she
is
testifying
to
on
the
witness
itand. |\n| 24 | Next
question. |\n| 25 | MS.
SEARLES:
Thank
you,
sir. |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n#### 33 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 Q Ms. Wang, you don't know, you have no idea where 2 the money came from to purchase the apartment; right? 3 4 A Q I have no personal knowledge about that. Nobody ever told you; right? 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A Nobody told me, but I heard diSCUssosiOInm'aybehCleauarsesoIme was requested, try to gather information. information. Q You have no knowledge at all about the purchase of the apartment, because you were on leave and living il Beijing at the time; right? The apartment was purchabed? I A I do not have personal knowledge about the purchase of apartment, because I was in Beijing by then, yes. 13 Q You don't know whether Mr. Kwok owns the apartment 14 through Genever; right? 15 16 A Q I learned that after this case happened. Yeah. Did you learn it after your deposition? 17 18 A No. I learned that when this including the deposition, because I was case happened, like I requested to gather 19 information for the attorney. \"Answer: I'm not quite clear about ultimately owns the apartment because he owns 20 21 22 Q \"Question: You understand that Mr. KW0k I Genever? thlt 23 24 25 answer. \"Questio~: You are not sure who owns Genever? \"Answer: Yes.\" Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n126\n\n.\n\n34 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 Do you ~ecall being asked those questions and 2 giving those answers? 3 4 5 to read page and MR. HARMON: Your Honor, if Mr. Moss is from the transcript, can he first tell ub line from which he is reading, so we cah going the follow 6 7 8 9 along? 19. THE COURT: Go ahead. MR. MOSS: I was just reading from 77, 13 to 10 .Q Do you recall being asked those questions and 11 giving those answers? 12 13 14 15 A Q A Q Yes, I did. You don't know who owns Genever; right? I do not have personal knowledge about that. ~ou don't know who owns Genever New York or Genever 16 B.V.I; right? 17 18 A I gather that information. It's kind of like B.V.I owns New York LLC company, and New York LLC company oLn 19 apartment. 20 21 9. 22 Q Now I'm going read from your deposition, 102, 7 to \"Question: You don't know who owns Genever 23 24 25 New York or Genever B.V.I. \"Answer: I don't know.\" Do you recall being asked that question and giving Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n126\n\n| | 35
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | that
answer? |\n| 2 | Yes,
I
did,
sir.
When
I
say
I
don't
know,
[
mean
I
A |\n| 3 | have
personal
information,
and
I'm
not
quite
slre,
so
do
not |\n| 4 | that's
why
for
conservative
answer,
I'd
rather
say,
I
don't |\n| 5 | know. |\n| 6 | Even
though
you
sworn
to
those
things
in
an
Q |\n| 7 | affidavit
to
this
Court? |\n| 8 | A
Sir,
we
have
understanding
difference.
Like,
my |\n| 9 | understanding
is
personal
information,
which
I
say
thlt,
I
am |\n| 10 | conservative
Chinese
woman,
so
that's
why,
if
I
do
no~
have |\n| 11 | that
personal
information,
or
I
did
not
involve,
handle,
by |\n| 12 | my
hands,
I
would
rather
say
I
don't
know.
Yeah,
I
don't |\n| 13 | want
to
guess. |\n| 14 | Q
So
you
were
being
conservative
at
your
deposition, |\n| 15 | I
but
not
conservative
when
you
made
those
same
statements
In |\n| 16 | court? |\n| 17 | A
I
am
conservative
person,
sir
and
I
will
be
100
,
I' |\n| 18 | and
I
am
100,
percent
responsible
for
my
personal
knOjledge |\n| 19 | and
information.
When
I
just
gather
information,
or
hearing |\n| 20 | it,
or
heard
something,
if
I'm
not
sure,
usually
I
jult
say
I |\n| 21 | don't
know.
Yeah. |\n| 22 | So
if
you
have
no
personal
knowledge
of
anything
in
Q |\n| 23 | the
affidavit,
who
is
responsible
for
that? |\n| 24 | A
Correct.
Do
I
not
have
personal
information. |\n\n#### 35 of 125\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 37 of 126\n\n36\n\n| | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Moss |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | don't
have
personal
information? |\n| 2 | Whose
affidavit?
A |\n| 3 | Your
affidavit?
Q |\n| 4 | Oh.
Me.
Myself.
Yes.
A |\n| 5 | But
you
just
told
me
that
you
don't
have
personal
Q |\n| 6 | knowledge
of
facts
in
the
affidavit\"
and
you
don't
tJke |\n| 7 | responsibility
when
you
don't
have
personal
knowledge;
right? |\n| 8 | A
Sir,
I'm
100
percent
responsible
for
my
affidavit, |\n| 9 | which
I
sweared.
I
have
understanding
difference
in
here, |\n| 10 | h'
f
1
I .
so
--
which
I
am
very
grate
u
I'm
glven
t
1S
opportun1ty
to |\n| 11 | explain,
because
there's
understanding
difference
bet~een |\n| 12 | what
I
said
what
I
was
deposing
--
what
I'm
deposing
by
you, |\n| 13 | sir,
and
what
I'm
meaning,
really,
I
have
personal |\n| 14 | information
or
not.
This
is
understanding
difference,
sir, |\n| 15 | ~nd
plus~
I'm
sorry
about
my
language.
Sometimes
when
you |\n| 16 | stare
at
me,
ask
me
that
question,
I'm
super
nervous.
Even |\n| 17 | right
now. |\n| 18 | I'm
sorry.
I'm
not
trying
to
make
you
nervous.
Q |\n| 19 | Sorry
about
that.
A |\n| 20 | You
don't
even
know
that
there
are
two
separate
Q |\n| 21 | Genever
entities;
right? |\n| 22 | A
You
mean
personal
knowledge,
or
my
gathered |\n| 23 | information? |\n| 24 | I
mean,
I'm
asking
you
the
question,
do
you
know
Q |\n| 25 | whether
or
not
there
are
two
separate
Genever
entities?
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | by
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Moss | 37 |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|\n| 1 | I
gather
the
information
saying
there
are
A | two |\n| 2 | separate
entities. | |\n| 3 | You
have
no
knowledge
of
any
pledges
of
the
Q | assets |\n| 4 | of
Genever
Holdings
LLC
or
Genever
Holdings
Corporation; | |\n| 5 | right? | |\n| 6 | A
Again,
I
do
not
have
any
personal
knowledge | about |\n| 7 | this.
This
is'my
gathered
information.
I
heard
abouf | this. |\n| 8 | Q
So
you
made
sworn
statements
to
the
Court | about |\n| 9 | facts
that
you
had
no
personal
knowledge
about,
that
, | I
was
I |\n| 10 | gathered
information
that
you
heard
about?
That's
your | |\n| 11 | testimony? | |\n| 12 | A
My
testimony,
there
are
two
kinds
of
information, | |\n| 13 | which
is
personal
information
knowledge
and
gathered | |\n| 14 | information
knowledge. | |\n| 15 | And
you
have
no
personal
knowledge
about
any
Q | |\n| 16 | pledges
of
the
apartment;
right? | |\n| 17 | Correct,
sir.
A | |\n| 18 | You
don't
know
whether
or
not
the
apartment
Q | has |\n| 19 | been
pledged
at
all;
right? | |\n| 20 | I
do
not
have
that
personal
information.
A | |\n| 21 | Q
You
never
had
any
discussions
with
anyone | about |\n| 22 | pledging
the
apartment;
right? | |\n| 23 | A
I
personally
did
not
discuss
anything
about | this. |\n| 24 | You
never
had
any
discussions
with
Mr.
Kwok
Q | about |\n| 25 | any
pledges;
right? | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n### **Wang. for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n38\n\n| 1 | May
I
ask,
what
do
you
mean,
discuss?
You
mean
A |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | ask,
or
mention,
or
discuss
how
do
we
pledge;
what
is |\n| 3 | resolved;
what
is
the
strategy
plan?
I'm
confused
about
your |\n| 4 | question.
What
do
you
mean,
discuss? |\n| 5 | Q
Did
you
ever
talk
about
the
pledges
with
Mr.
Kwok? |\n| 6 | A
I
mentioned,
or
he
mentioned
that
to
me,
I
don't |\n| 7 | remember
that
clearly.
Just,
Oh,
there
is
a
pledge.
But
I |\n| 8 | did
not
ever
involve,
like,
Okay,
sit
down
and
tell
me
what |\n| 9 | is
happening,
what
is
the
details,
and
I
never
ever
ihvolve, |\n| 10 | like,
Okay,
I
was
going
there
and
doing
that
pledge.
I |\n| 11 | didn't
do
that. |\n| 12 | I'm
going
to
read
from
your
deposition,
page
81,
Q |\n| 13 | lines
9
through
11: |\n| 14 | \"You
never
had
any
discussion
with
Mr.
Kwok |\n| 15 | about
pledges? |\n| 16 | \"Answer:
No.\" |\n| 17 | Do
you
recall
being
asked
that
question
and
giving |\n| 18 | that
answer? |\n| 19 | THE
COURT:
That's
not
inconsistent
with
what |\n| 20 | she
just
testified
to.
It's
completely
consistelt
with |\n| 21 | what
she
just
said. |\n| 22 | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
she
denied
having
any |\n| 23 | I
conversations
in
the
deposition,
and
she
just
said
that |\n| 24 | she
did
have
a
conversation. |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
That's
not
what
I
heard
her
say. |\n| | I |\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n13\n\n14\n\n16\n\n17\n\n18\n\n19\n\n20\n\n21\n\n22\n\n23\n\n24\n\n39 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** Did you have a conversation with Mr. Kwok about the ownership of the apartment? THE WITNESS: No, sir. I just heard. I ask him, and he told me, and I know, okay, this is the situation. But I did not have, like, a discussibn, of five, ten minutes, or sit down to go through bhe details. Because I'm just like an administrator, like collect information for the lawyer and get documrnts for the lawyer, so I don't know the background, and [ don't know the logic. 11 Q Did Mr. Kwok ever tell you that the apartment or 12 Genever had been pledged? A Q Sorry, sir. What .is the question? Did Mr. Kwok ever tell you that the apartment or 15 Genever had been pledged? A Q A Q pledged? I believe is not him. Yeah. You believe he did not tell you that? He mentioned that to me. Mr. Kwok told you that the apartment or Genever was A I don't remember it was first time he told me, or I told him, because I gathered that information from otLer people. Then, kind of like, I told him, and he mentiln that to me. 25 Q At your deposition, page 81:\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n# Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 41 of\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n> **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** \"Question: You never told Mr. Kwok tHat Genever was pledg~d? \"Answer: No. \"Question: He never told you that it was pledged?' \"Answer: No.\" Q Do you recall being asked those questions and giving those answers? A Correct, sir. Q If you can, please turn to Exhibit B of your affidavit. (Whereupon, an exhibit was displayed to the Court.) Q I would like to direct your attention to the first page. This is a document that you attached to your affidavit; right, Ms. Wang? A Correct. Q In support of your statement that the apartment was pledged; right? A Looks like, yes. Q And I would like to direct your attention to the first page. Do you see there's a charge ID, FBAKOY? A Sorry. Which page, sir? Q Right here. It's the first page of Exhibit B. You see the charge ID? It says FBAKOY? Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n> > 40 of 125\n\n-\\_.\\_. \\_.\\_--------\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 42 of 126\n\n41 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss** 1 2 3 4 5 6 A Q A Q A Q Yes. I saw that. And pledge was made to Roscalitar 2? Yes. And the pledge date was May 21, 2015; right? Correct. Did anyone ever tell you, or did you ever gather 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 the information -- MS. SEARLES: Objection. Your Honor, IT apologize for interrupting again, but he just kelps reading from this document which is not actually in evidence. THE COURT: Is this an exhibit that you have in your exhibit book? 14 15 16 MR. MOSS: Yes. It's in the it's her affidavit -- it's attached to It's their document. exhibit book, and her affidlvit. Q Ms. Wang, when you Court and you swore that the May of 2015, did you know - had actually been terminated **in,** in March of 20117 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 MS. SEARLES: But it has not been admitted. It's one of the ones we have an issue over. THE COURT: All right. Look, just proceed. submitted this document bo the I . apartment had been Pledgjd since did you know that this p!edge before you put your affikavit 25 A Sir, let me make it clear, again. When you depose Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n### **w.ang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n42\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 me, you give me this, and.without giving me my affidarit. And remember, my affidavit, which I signed, it's about one d h d .. hi year ago, an w en you epose me, you Just g~ve me t e exhibits, you did not give me any of my affidavits, ahd all the exhibits, which I am just a person collected them from other people. So I have to emphasize that as administrator of Go lden Spr~ng, . that I co11ect documents and ~n. fl.ormat~on every day, so there's lot of documents and informatioh I'm collecting for you, for my attorney, and for other prbject. 1 I cannot remember which one is for what, so when you depose me, you show me that this is just one or two pages in my thousands, millions of pages of other documents. And I have to say that when I collect all of these documents, why I'm the person collecting, because my 15 16 colleague, either they are kidnapped Party, either because of a threaten; by Chinese Communist h . h' I. b t ey qu~t t e~r DO ; 17 either they just leaving nothing and just left. So I'm in a 18 very hopeless position to help to collect all of these 19 documents.\n\n20 21 22 And a lot of documents I just put it in my file and I do not have time to review that, so it's I even really difficulty for me that you show me the documents in I your 23 deposition and ask me if I can recall from my memory, right 24 25 away, to tell you, this documents, I know what was and what was resolved and what was there. So it's happening I really I\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n126\n\n43\n\n| 1 | just
like
two,
three
pieces
of
paper
in
my
whole
files. | | | | | | |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|\n| 2 | Okay.
So
I'm
not
talking
about
your
deposition.
Q | | | | | | |\n| 3 | What
I'm
asking
you
is
--
it's
just
very
simple.
Let
me
try | | | | | | |\n| 4 | the
question
again.
When
you
submitted
this
document | | | | | | |\n| 5 | swearing
that
the
apartment
had
been
pledged
since
Ma¥
of | | | | | | |\n| 6 | 2015,
did
you
know
that
this
pledge
was
terminated
in
March | | | | | | |\n| 7 | of
2017,
and
that
the
apartment
that
you
were
swearing
was | | | | | | |\n| 8 | pledged
was
not
actually
pledged
anymore?
Did
you
knbw
that? | | | | | | |\n| 9 | A
I
do
not
have
personal
information,
knowled6e. | | | | | | |\n| 10 | Q
Did
you
hear
that
pledge
had
been
terminate~
before | | | | | | |\n| 11 | you
swore
to
the
Court
that
it
was
terminated? | | | | | | |\n| 12 | I
don't
remember
that,
sir.
A | | | | | | |\n| 13 | MR.
MOSS:
May
I,
your
Honor? | | | | | | |\n| 14 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the | | | | | | |\n| 15 | witness.
) | | | | | | |\n| 16 | MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor
-- | | | | | | |\n| 17 | MS.
SEARLES:
Can
we
know
what
he's
showing | | | | | | |\n| 18 | her? | | | | | | |\n| 19 | MR.
MOSS:
This
is
PX
43.
They
have
a | | | | | | |\n| 20 | relevance
objection,
not
an
authenticity
objection,
to | | | | | | |\n| 21 | I
this
document,
your
Honor.
It's
in
the
exhibit
binders. | | | | | | |\n| 22 | (Whereupon,
an
exhibit
was
displayed
tl
the | | | | | | |\n| 23 | Court.
) | | | | | | |\n| 24 | MS.
SEARLES:
It's
the
same
relevance | | | | | | |\n| 25 | objection
that
I
gave
before
with
respect
to
the | | | | | | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | | | | | | |\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n| 1 | you~
pledges.
This
does
not
have
to
do
with
what
Honor |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | you
laid
out
in
our
last
oral
argument
that
wantld
to |\n| 3 | hear
today.
It
was
the
timing
and
the
purchase
lnd
sale |\n| 4 | of
the
apartment.
I
think
that
there
is
no
disprte
at |\n| 5 | this
point
between
any
of
the
parties
that
at
one
point |\n| 6 | there
were
pledges
on
the
apartment,
and
at
this
point |\n| 7 | there
are
no
pledges
on
the
apartment,
so
I
don't
know |\n| 8 | why
we
are
continuing
to
discuss
this.
It's
not
an |\n| 9 | actual
encumbrance
if
the
pledge
doesn't
exist. |\n| 10 | MR.
MOSS:
Your
Honor,
if
they
want
to |\n| 11 | stipulate
that
the
pledge
that
she
swore
was
on
had
been |\n| 12 | terminated
before
she
filed
her
affidavit,
I;m
hkppy
to |\n| 13 | do
that,
to
avoid
wasting
time. |\n| 14 | MS.
SEARLES:
No.
I'm
not
going
to
st~pulate |\n| 15 | to
that,
but
I
will
stipulate
that
since
she
combleted |\n| 16 | I
her
affidavit,
and
since
we
have
had
oral
argument,
and |\n| 17 | I
don't
know
however
many
months
of
prejudgment |\n| 18 | attachment
discovery,
that
the
pledge
has
been
l~fted, |\n| 19 | and
I
don't
think
we
are
in
any
disagreement
on
hhat. |\n| 20 | THE
COURT:
This
is
a
document
that
sats
that |\n| 21 | the
pledge
has
been
released.
You
don't
dispute
that. |\n| 22 | So
why
are
we
wasting
time? |\n| 23 | MS.
SEARLES:
That
was
my
question
as
to
why |\n| 24 | we
are
continuing
to
discuss
something
-- |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
I'm
taking
your
representation
as |\n| | I |\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n# **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n45\n\na stipulation that the pledge was released, so there's no need for there to be any questioning about tJiS document.\n\nMS. SEARLES: I just want to be 100 percent clear, not that I'm making that r~presentation, lhere is no pledge in place. It was released.\n\n7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 There is a discrepancy between documenis that they obtained from DC and documents we obtained from B.V.I, that had a discrepancy at one po;nt, • wherle our document was dated close in time to theirs, and It's said that the pledge hadn't been released. Theils did. We argued at the time that the B.V.I was the applopriate one. We have pulled that from, you know, outSidl help. We didn't pull it ourselves.\n\n15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 At this point in time, though, there are no pledges, and we are all in agreement on that, anh so I I want to be clear that there is a discrepancy as fO some of the documents, and the timing of the pledge, but the pledge has been lifted for months at this point, so again, I'm just cbnfused as to why we are continuing to go into this, because if the argument is the encumbrance, pursuant to the CPLR, there is no encumbrance.\n\n24 25 THE COURT: This is a one-day hearing. It's now an hour and a half into the hearing, a third of\n\n# **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\n46\n\n| 1 | which
has
been
attorney
coll~q~y,
and/or
regurgifation |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | of
what's
in
two
sets
of
papers.
You
are
stipulating |\n| 3 | there's
no
extant
pledge
on
this
apartment,
so
I
don't |\n| 4 | know
what
relevance
this
particular
document
has
to |\n| 5 | anything. |\n| 6 | She
stipulated
that
there's
no
extant
pledge. |\n| 7 | MR.
MOSS:
Can
I
respond,
your
Honor,
bn |\n| 8 | relevance,
your
Honor? |\n| 9 | THE
COURT:
Yes. |\n| 10 | fO
MR.
MOSS:
Ms.
Wang's
affidavit
swore
the |\n| 11 | Court
that
the
pledge
was
on,
and
a
year
before
her |\n| 12 | affidavit
the
pledge
had
been
terminated,
so
it,b
a |\n| 13 | false
statement
to
the
Court
about
the
existence
of
a |\n| 14 | pledge
in
the
courts
of
this-proceeding
in
order
to
try |\n| 15 | to
avoid
an
attachment,
it
goes
directly
to
credibility. |\n| 16 | It
goes
directly
to
fraud. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Well-- |\n| 18 | MR.
MOSS:
I
can
move
on,
your
Honor.
If |\n| 19 | that's
preferable,
I'm
happy
to
move
on. |\n| 20 | Q
Ms.
Wang,
I
take
it
you
never
saw
that
document |\n| 21 | before
you
filed
your
affidavit;
right?
The
document
you |\n| 22 | have
in
front
of
you? |\n| 23 | A
Which
document? |\n| 24 | PX
43,
you
never
saw?
Q |\n| 25 | A
Even
now,
let
me
tell
you,
I
don't
remember
that. |\n| | |\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Direct by Moss**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n47\n\n| 1 | Yes.
And
let
me
repeat
again,
if
I
may,
I
am
adminis1trator |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | to
Golden
Spring.
This
is
not
my
choice.
Because
Chinese |\n| 3 | Communist
Party,
they
kidnap
almost
all
my
colleague,
between |\n| 4 | me
and
the
company.
So
my
background,
I
do
not
have |\n| 5 | financial
professional\"
knowledge.
I
do
not
have
American |\n| 6 | I
real
estate
professional
knowledge.
So
I
was
the
onl¥ |\n| 7 | person,
by
then,
speak
at
least
a
little
bit\"
English,
and
try |\n| 8 | to
help
the
family,
so
that's
why.
A
lot
of
my
colleague, |\n| 9 | they
are
either
kidnapped,
or
disappeared,
or
just
le~t |\n| 10 | I
without
saying
anything,
drop
off
their
stuff
on
my
table. |\n| 11 | I
spent
a
long
time
trying
to
learn
and
diglst
and |\n| 12 | figure
out
what
they
are,
and
I'm
not
good
about
readlng |\n| 13 | documents.
Even
now,
sir,
you
show
me
this,
and
I'm
buper |\n| 14 | nervous
here,
that
if
you
do
not
point
where
the
Pledke,
that |\n| 15 | word,
I
still
couldn't
recognize
this
as
one
of
the
dLcuments |\n| 16 | passed
by
my
hands.
Because
really,
my
background
is
here, |\n| 17 | I'm
not
a
liar,
and
I
never
forge
anything,
and
why
I'm
here, |\n| 18 | I'm
trying
to
help,
to
help
the
case.
Thank
you,
sir. |\n| 19 | Q
Thank
you. |\n| 20 | MR.
MOSS:
Nothing
further
right
now,
your |\n| 21 | Honor. |\n| 22 | CROSS
EXAMINATION |\n| 23 | BY
MS.
SEARLES: |\n| 24 | Good
morning,
Ms.
Wang.
I'm
going
to
try
to
speak
Q |\n| 25 | up,
so
you
can
hear
me. |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | 48
by
Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Searles |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | MS.
SEARLES:
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
step |\n| 2 | back
for
just
a
quick
second
to
give
a
better |\n| 3 | understanding
of
something
for
your
Honor. |\n| 4 | When
did
you
first
start
working
for
the
Guo
Q |\n| 5 | Family? |\n| 6 | A
I
started
working
for
Guo
Family
from
2009
when
I |\n| 7 | was
in
Beijing.
I
came
back
from
Europe.
I
finished
my |\n| 8 | university,
and
I
came
back
to
Beijing,
start
working
for
the |\n| 9 | Guo
Family. |\n| 10 | And
when
you
say
Guo
Family,
you
mean
more
than
Q |\n| 11 | Mr.
Kwok's
immediate
family;
correct? |\n| 12 | A
Correct
Guo
Family,
what
I
learned,
there
are |\n| 13 | more
than
100
people,
and
Mr.
Kwok,
Miles
Kwok,
he
is
number |\n| 14 | seven
son
of
the
whole
family.
He
has
more
elder
brother, |\n| 15 | and
he
has
his
parents.
He
has
his
niece,
nephews,
ahd |\n| 16 | sister-in-law,
which
right
now
he
has
number
five
and
number |\n| 17 | six
brother,
and
they
are
still
in
jail.
They
are
arrested |\n| 18 | and
put
in
jail
by
Chinese
Communist
Party,
and
a
lot
of
his |\n| 19 | family
member,
including
his
son,
his
daughter,niece, |\n| 20 | I
nephew,
and
his
sister-in-law,
brothers,
they
were
all |\n| 21 | threatened,
kidnapped,
and
put
in
jail
without
any
relson |\n| 22 | I
until
now,
including
all
of
his,
like,
long-term
employee, |\n| 23 | just
like
me. |\n| 24 | And
this
Guo
Family
that
you
work
for,
they
are
Q |\n| 25 | located
in
multiple
places
around
the
world
including
China, |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff. - Cross by Searles**\n\n?\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n25\n\nincluding the individuals you were just speaking abOU1 A Correct. They live in china, Mainland chini' they do, and live in, like Hong Kong, like Europe, like and 4 America. Worldwide.\n\n5 Q And when did you move to New York to start working 6 for the Guo Family?\n\n7 8 9 A That was a date I never forget. That was April 23rd, I came to New York and U.S. I never be I 2015. able to I go back to China and see my family, and see my son. When I 10 was left -- when I left China, then my son is 1.5, is one 11 years old, five months. Now he is going to be, like, six 12 13 14 years old, and he is going to be, go to the school. family, my husband and my son, stopped talking with 2017, which is for now more than 16 months, I heard And my ml since nhthing 15 from them, I received nothing from them.\n\n16 17 Chinese Communist Party, they forged a lot things they forged my voice, my tape, my documents. of my I '['hey 18 forged all my personal information. They threaten my 19 husband. They detain my husband, interrogating my husband. 20 They told my husband I betray my country, I betray my family, 21 I abandon my son and my family, which I never agree. So my 22 23 24 husband stopped talking with me since the end of 2017, and my ~on stopped talking and seeing me by WhatsApp, by wec~at, by video, more than 16 months until now.\n\nI came here because of two reasons. First, I'm a\n\n# **Wang - for Plaintiff - Cross by Searles**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n50\n\n1 2 loyal person. My husband in college, and I went to is my first boyfriend. I meet school in France with him, lnd him we 3 studied together. We get married, and I never have a second 4 5 6 7 8 boyfriend. I never have second husband at all. I to~d him . 1 . \" h ,I . many t1mes, I'm not eav1ng you. I'm Just 1n t e s1tuat10n I 1 Ch ' C ' . hi, cannot contro. But 1nese ommun1st Party, t ey cont1nue I to threaten him and his whole family, and they force my husband divorce me.\n\n9 10 11 12 13 14 This is the third time they are trying. Last month, my husband lawyer contacted me via my elder br~ther, because my husband stop talking to me like more than ~ike 16 I months. My younger brother told me, Sister, they want to divorce you, and they need you appear in the court in China. I say, It's not possible, because Chinese Communist Party is 15 looking for me. I cannot go back to China.\n\n16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Then they come back, say that, Sister they want to you make a video with your passport and your, like, statement, saying, Okay, I'm willing to divorce with my husband. I told my younger brother, it's not going tl happen like this way, because Chinese Communist Party, they llreadY forged a lot of my video and my voice. If I ever madf this video, and saying in front of camera, I'm willing to divorce I my husband, and one day -- my son is six years old, now. He is going to be bigger, and he is going to be adult, ahd that I video will be forged and used by Chinese Communist Party\n\n# Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 52 of\n\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | | | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|---------------------|--|--|-----------------------------|\n| | | | |\n\n# **Wang - for Plaintiff - Cross by Searles**\n\n126\n\n| 1 | again,
again,
again,
in
the
words.
I
cannot,
one
day,
my
son |\n|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | standing
in
front
of
me
and
ask
me,
Mom,
it
was
you
gave
up |\n| 3 | me
,
and
abandon
me. |\n| 4 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
That's
enough. |\n| 5 | THE
WITNESS:
Sorry. |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
That's
not
responsive
to
the |\n| 7 | question. |\n| 8 | THE
WITNESS:
Sorry,
sorry.
Sorry.
Sorry, |\n| 9 | your
Honor. |\n| 10 | Okay.
We'll
change
track
just
a
little
bit;
okay?
Q |\n| 11 | I
So
you
have
said
have
been
you
here
since
2015
in |\n| 12 | New
York
City,
working
for
the
Guo
Family? |\n| 13 | A
Correct.
No.
I
work
for
Guo
Family
from
2009,
and |\n| 14 | since
April
23rd,
2015
I
came
to
America,
continue
WOlk
for |\n| 15 | Guo
Family,
and
Mr.
Kwok
himself. |\n| 16 | And
currently
you
are
president
of
Golden
Spring
Q |\n| 17- | New
York;
correct? |\n| 18 | A
Yes. |\n| 19 | And
what
does
Golden
Spring
New
York
do
for
the
Guo
Q |\n| 20 | Family? |\n| 21 | A
Golden
Spring
New
York
came
back
to
life
sirce
I |\n| 22 | took
over,
and
that
was
in
the
beginning
of
2018.
Before |\n| 23 | that,
Golden
Spring
New
York
employee
either
left,
lite |\n| 24 | quitted,
like
disappeared.
So
there's
lots
of
like
leftover |\n| 25 | issue
I
have
to
handle,
and
since
I
start
to
work
for
Golden |\n| | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 53 of 126\n\n### **Wang - for Plaintiff - Cross by Searles**\n\n52\n\n| 1 | Spring
New
York,
I
make,
or
I
define,
I
define
Golden
Spring |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | New
York
as
Guo
Family
family
office,
so
I
start
to
cbllect |\n| 3 | everything
and
operate. |\n| 4 | So
among
your
responsibilities,
you
collect
Q |\n| 5 | documents
and
operate
the
entity? |\n| 6 | A
Correct.
Yeah. |\n| 7 | What'
are
some
of
your
other
responsibilitie.s
for
Q |\n| 8 | the
Guo
Family? |\n| 9 | Sorry.
What
is
your
question?
A |\n| 10 | What
are
some
of
your
other
responsibilitiels
for
Q |\n| 11 | Golden
Spring,
for
the
Guo
Family,
in
your
role
as
prjSident? |\n| 12 | A
Other
responsibility,
including
like
build
a
team; |\n| 13 | and
including,
like,
help
all
the
litigation;
help
to
collect |\n| 14 | the
documents
and
collect
information;
and
help
to
do,
like, |\n| 15 | daily
operation,
every
day. |\n| 16 | Q
So
when
you
say
daily
operation,
do
you
mean
making |\n| 17 | I eve;rybody
sure
the
bills
are
paid
on
time,
making
sure
that |\n| 18 | else
knows
what
they
are
supposed
to
be
doing? |\n| 19 | A
Correct.
Because
a
lot
of,
like,
because
of
my |\n| 20 | previously
colleague,
as
I
said,
they
just
disappeared,
gone, |\n| 21 | so
a
lot
of,
like,
outstanding
questions,
bills,
issuls,
that |\n| 22 | when
I
came
in,
I
start
to
work
for
Golden
Spring,
it's |\n| 23 | almost
everything
back
to
the
track,
so
I
can
see,
and
I'm |\n| 24 | proud
of
that. |\n| 25 | Q
You
have
testified
here
this
morning
quite
a
bit
I |\n\n53 **Wang - for Plaintiff - Cross by Searles** 1 2 about this idea of personal knowledge, and I you used was gathered knowledge. Is there a believe Ithe term difference in 3 your mind between those two? 4 5 6 Q THE COURT: I understand the difference. MS. SEARLES: Okay. I think you might have it in front of you, if you 7 need to reference it. It is Exhibit 34, the affidavit which 8 is not in'evidence. 9 10 Prior to submitting this affidavit before Court, did you gather the underlying documents that the I were part 11 of the exhibits? 12 A Correct. All the exhibits, they are all pa,rt of my 13 gathered documents. Q Did you review the documents, look at them, read 15 them, before you submitted that affidavit? 16 A I didn't review all of them, because first I gather 17 a lot of documents. Second, as I said, my third language is 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 English, so if you listen to my speaking, maybe just, like, I speak not bad English, but when you have me read all of this, like, very legal or official documents, and I could not understand them, like, very quickly, I have to look jt my dictionary and try to figure out what they are talkiJ9. Q Did you speak with others about those docuJents, others within the Golden Spring or Guo Family organizllations, about those documents before you submitted your affidavit? I Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter 126\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 55 of 126\n\n| | Wang
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Searles
by | 54 |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|\n| 1 | A
I
collect
these
documents
from
them. | |\n| 2 | Q
And
you
spoke
with
others
about
those
documents? | |\n| 3 | MR.
MOSS:
Objection.
Leading. | |\n| 4 | Yes.
A | |\n| 5 | MS.
SEARLES:
She's
not
my
witness. | |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
It's
an
adverse
witness. | |\n| 7 | Look,
what
I'm
understanding
is
that | this |\n| 8 | witness
has
no
personal
knowledge
of
anything. | IShe
has |\n| 9 | collected
a
lot
of
information,
some,
most,
gr | I
a!l.l
of |\n| 10 | which
she
understood,
and
the
affidavit
that
she | signed |\n| 11 | is
based
on
her
understanding,
as
limited
by
her | |\n| 12 | language
issues,
of
what
lawyers
put
in
front
of | her
to |\n| 13 | sign.
Is
there
anything
else
I
need
to
know
about | her |\n| 14 | testimony? | |\n| 15 | I
would
just
direct
you
to
the
first
paragraph | on |\n| 16 | there,
speaking
about
the
personal
knowledge
issue. | I
[sn't
it |\n| 17 | correct
that
that
paragraph
does
not
actually
say
thah | it's |\n| 18 | based
on
personal
knowledge? | |\n| 19 | -
-
A
You
mean | |\n| 20 | The
first
paragraph
of
your
affidavit.
Q | |\n| 21 | A
The
first
paragraph. | |\n| 22 | Yes.
The
term,
Based
on
my
personal
knowledge,
Q | |\n| 23 | does
not
exist
in
that
document;
correct? | |\n| 24 | THE
COURT:
Okay. | |\n| 25 | Correct.
Sorry.
A | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 56 of 126\n\n| | by
Wang.
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Searles | 55 |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 1 | THE
WITNESS:
Sorry.
Sorry,
sir. | |\n| 2 | MS.
SEARLES:
I'm
switching
topics
now,
your | |\n| 3 | 'Honor.
Just
so
that
we
are
clear. | |\n| 4 | Has
the
apartment
that's
at
issue
here
in
this
Q | |\n| 5 | hearing,
has
that
been
sold? | |\n| 6 | A
No. | |\n| 7 | To
your
knowledge,
is
it
even
on
the
market
right
Q | |\n| 8 | now? | |\n| 9 | Correct.
I
have
this
personal
knowledge.
A | |\n| 10 | And
this
knowledge,
meaning
it
is
or
isn't
on
the
Q | |\n| 11 | market? | |\n| 12 | A
It's
not
on
the
market
at
all. | |\n| 13 | MS.
SEARLES:
I
think
that's
it,
your
Honor. | |\n| 14 | I
MR.
MOSS:
One
more
quest~on,
your
Honor? | |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
Yes. | |\n| 16 | RE-DIRECT
EXAMINATION | |\n| 17 | BY
MR.
MOSS: | |\n| 18 | When
was
the
apartment
taken
off
the
market?
Q
,
I | |\n| 19 | A
About
one
month.
Around,
like,
one
month
off
the | |\n| 20 | market,
from
now.
About,
like,
one
month
ago. | |\n| 21 | MR.
MOSS:
I
have
nothing
else. | |\n| 22 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
You
may
step
down. | |\n| 23 | (Whereupon,
the
witness
was
excused
from
the | |\n| 24 | witness
stand.) | |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
Next
witness. | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n**Wang - for Plaintiff - Re-Direct by Moss** 1 (Whereupon, there was a pause in the 2 proceedings.) 3 4 5 THE COURT: When you get the witness, ¥ou will let me know. (Whereupon, a recess was taken.) 6 \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* 7 MICHAEL U L L MAN, having been duly sworn b¥ the B clerk, was examined and testified as follows: 9 10 11 12 13 THE.CLERK: Please state your full name and address, in a loud clear voice. THE WITNESS: Michael Ullman, 340 West 57th Street, apartment BG, New York, New'York 10019. THE CLERK: Have a seat. 14 DIRECT EXAMINATION 15 BY MR. SARNOFF: 16 Q Good morning, Mr. Ullman. We are a little bit 17 behind, so I'm going try to move this along. 1B 19 20 21 22 23 A Q A Q A Are you employed, sir? I am. By who? The Sherry-Netherland. What is your position there? My title is Executive vice President, Chief 24 Operating Officer. 25 Q Is that effectively akin to the Lisa A. Casey - Official Court\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A Q A Q A Q A Q **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** Yes, it is. How long have you held that position? At the Sherry? Yes. Nine years. So about since 2010? That's correct. How long have you been in the hotel management 57 9 business? 10 A A little over 40 years. 11 12 Q As your general manager role, are you involved in the new role, COO general manager h 1 \" I purc ase app ~cat~on 13 process? 14 A I'm involved in putting together the documentation 15 to make sure that it's all there before I ship it off to the 16 board members. 17 18 Q And purchases and roughly how many apartment transactions, sales have yo~ been involved with in yotr 19 tenure at the Sherry-Netherland? 20 21 A Q 60. Does the Sherry-Netherland have a Board of 22 Directors? 23 24 2.5 A Q A Yes, it does. And does have a president or a chairperson? It has president. Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 59 of\n\n| | 126 |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | 58
Ullman.
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff |\n| 1 | .Q
And
who
is
the
president? |\n| 2 | Michael
Horvitz.
A |\n| 3 | And
has
he
been
the
president.
since
Mr.
Kwok's
Q |\n| 4 | purchase
in
2015? |\n| 5 | A
Yes. |\n| 6 | And
what
is
Mr.
Horvitz's
background,
generally?
Q |\n| 7 | He's
a
former
partner
for
Jones
Day,
as
an
A |\n| 8 | attorney.
He
is
on
the
--
a
trustee
of
the
Frick.
He
is,
I |\n| 9 | I
think,
a
trustee
of
the
Cleveland
Clinic,
and
a
former |\n| 10 | chairman
of
IMG
International
Management. |\n| 11 | Q
Is
the
board
of
the
Sherry-Netherland
responsible |\n| 12 | for
reviewing
and
approving
apartment
purchase
apPlicktionS? |\n| 13 | Yes.
A |\n| 14 | Could
you
generally
describe
the
approval
process?
Q |\n| 15 | ,
deta~,'I
~I'dea.
but
.'
,
the
Court
Not
in
amaz~ng
Just
to
g~ve
an |\n| 16 | A
Yes.
So
there's
a
selling
and
purchasing
bloker |\n| 17 | that,
they
bring
the
client.
The
property
is
listed.
They |\n| 18 | bring
the
client.
They
agree
on
a
price
and
on
terms.
They |\n| 19 | review
the
minutes
of
the
board
meetings
and
the
condltion
of |\n| 20 | the
building.
Then
they
put
together
they
come
to
us
to |\n| 21 | ask
for
a
package,
what's
required
in
the
package.
They
put |\n| 22 | I together,
that
board
package
together,
and
when
it's
all
put |\n| 23 | they
submit
it
to
us. |\n| 24 | And
what
type
of
information
is
included
in
Q |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
I
know
all
about
this.
I
las
the |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | 59
by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | president
of
a
New
York
City
co-op
for
12
years. |\n| 2 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Duly
noted. |\n| 3 | THE
COURT:
We
can
skip
it. |\n| 4 | Do
you
know
who
Kwok
Ho
Wan
is,
or
Miles
Kwok?
Q |\n| 5 | Yes.
A |\n| 6 | Did
the
there
come
a
time
when
he
applied
to
Q |\n| 7 | purchase
an
apartment
in
the
Sherry-Netherland? |\n| 8 | Yes.
A |\n| 9 | You
do
you
recall
when,
about,
that
was?
Q |\n| 10 | A
It
was
early
2015.
I
believe
it
was
Februa~y
of |\n| 11 | 2015. |\n| 12 | Did
Mr.
Kwok
go
through
the,
sort
of,
typical
Q |\n| 13 | application
process? |\n| 14 | A
Yes. |\n| 15 | Did
he
provide
financial
information
to
the
board?
Q |\n| 16 | A
Yes. |\n| 17 | Do
you
recall,
basically,
what
type
of
financial
Q |\n| 18 | information
he
provided? |\n| 19 | A
He
provided,
the
first
time
--
the
first
time
that |\n| 20 | I
It
he
provided
information
--
which
I
only
saw
afterwards. |\n| 21 | was
confidential.
It
was
kept
in
a
folder
and
I
gave
it
to |\n| 22 | the
board
president,
but
it
was
documentation,
I
believe
that |\n| 23 | was
in
Renminbi
and
that
was
mainly
in
Chinese,
and
sl
that |\n| 24 | I
was
the
first
document
that
was
sent.
The
board
met
on
it |\n| 25 | and
subsequently
asked
for
more
detailed
financial |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n| | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
Page 61 of |\n|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | |\n| | 60
by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff |\n| 1 | information
in
U.S.
dollars. |\n| 2 | Q
When
you'submitted
that
application
informarion, |\n| 3 | did
you
understand
that
he
was
purporting
to
own
or
control |\n| 4 | that
information? |\n| 5 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 6 | understanding
is
not
relevant.
The
documents
for |\n| 7 | themselves.
They
are
all
in
evidence. |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained. |\n| 9 | Did
Mr.
Kwok
show
the
Sherry-Netherland
any
Q |\n| 10 | information
about
any
assets
he
purported
to
hold
in
the |\n| 11 | United
States? |\n| 12 | A
No. |\n| 13 | Did
he
provide
the
Sherry-Netherl~nd
with
any
Q |\n| 14 | assets
that
he
purported
to
hold
in
his
own
name? |\n| 15 | No.
A |\n| 16 | Do
you
recall
any
other
prospective
Q |\n| 17 | Sherry-Netherland
purchaser,
both
not
showing
assets
in
their |\n| 18 | h
d
I
h
own
name,
and
not
s
ow~ng
assets
~n
t
e
Un~te
States? |\n| 19 | No~
A |\n| 20 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 21 | Q
So
is
it
fair
to
say
that
-- |\n| 22 | THE
COURT:
There's
an
objection. |\n| 23 | What
relevance
is
that
to
anything? |\n| 24 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Uniqueness
of
his
application, |\n| 25 | and
whether
or
not
the
Sherry-Netherland
found
i~ |\n| | I |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 62 of 126\n\n| | 61
by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff |\n|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | necessary,
in
the
light
of
all
-- |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
You
can
ask
him
what
the |\n| 3 | Sherry-Netherland,
did
but
they
approved
the
purchase. |\n| 4 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Okay. |\n| 5 | Q
Excluding
Mr.
Kwok,
during
your
tenure
at
the |\n| 6 | I
Sherry-Netherland,
has
any
tenant
used
a
double
LLC
structure |\n| 7 | to
buy
an
apartment? |\n| 8 | No.
A |\n| 9 | And
excusing
Mr.
Kwok,
had
any
tenant
ever
used
a |\n| 10 | Q
foreign
LLC
structure
to
buy
an
apartment? |\n| 11 | A
No. |\n| | |\n| 12
13 | Q
You
mentioned
a
minute
ago
that
he
didn't
show
any |\n| | U.S.
assets.
Did
the
Sherry-Netherland
impose
any
palticular |\n| 14 | conditions
or
safeguards
on
his
purchase
as
a
result? |\n| 15 | A
Yes. |\n| 16 | Do
you
recall
what
those
safeguards
were?
Q |\n| 17 | A
Yes.
There
was
a
security
deposit
covering
a |\n| 18 | five-year
period,
for
estimated
maintenance
charges. |\n| 19 | Do
you
remember
what
the
amount
of
the
security
Q |\n| 20 | deposit
was? |\n| 21 | A
It
was
approximately
million.
'\\$3.3 |\n| 22 | Do
you
recall
whether
Mr.
Kwok
was
also
asked
to
Q |\n| 23 | sign
an
occupancy
agreement? |\n| 24 | A
Yes. |\n| 25 | Was
he
also
asked
to
personally
guarantee
the
Q |\n| | I
Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n62 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 proprietary lease? 2 3 4 A Q A Yes. How was the size of the secure deposit derired? It was derived by the board having a meeting, and I 5 believe it was actually -- 6 7 B MR. HARMON: Objection, has personal knowledge, he's just the board did. And relevance. your Honor. Unless he. testifying abolt what 9 10 11 12 THE COURT: Look, let's not nitpick. ['m not even sure what the relevance of any of this testlmony is. Go ahead. Answer it. 13 A It was -- I sat in the board meeting where, I 14 15 16 17 1B 19 20 21 22 believe it was actually prior to that, the law firm that was dealing with Mr. Kwok's purchase one of the firms, I hhink, offered that, and I believe Mr. Kwok offered that ank the board had discussed what the right amount would be', anld then five years, they thought, was adequate to cover; sincl there were no assets in the U.S., that if Mr. Kwok didn't ply the 'maintenance, we had adequate coverage to protect oursllves. Q Before changing gears, do you recall anythihg about the timeline of Mr. Kwok's application and closing? 23 24 A Q Yes. Did Mr. Kwok put any time constraints on that 25 process? **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 63 of 126\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 64 of\n\n126\n\n**Ullman. for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff**\n\n63\n\n| A | Yes. |\n|---|------|\n| | |\n\n1\n\n2\n\nQ Could you tell us about that?\n\n3 4 A I believe it began in February,. and it had ,0 by March 6th. Having gone back in my notes, I think ~t close was 5 March 6th that it had to close by, or he could cancel a 6 7 .contract, and I think remember hearing, it was it was my understanding, from what I for feng shui reasons, that It had 8 to close.\n\n9 Q Did that type of timing -- was that type of typing 10 typical of applications at the Sherry-Netherland?\n\n11 12 MR. HARMON: Objection, your Honor. What is this relevant to?\n\n13 14 THE COURT: It's not relevant to anything, but go ahead. It's not typical. Okay. Next.\n\n15 Q Had any prospective purchaser asked to close in 16 that short a time?\n\n17 A No.\n\n18 19 Q After Mr. Kwok closed and moved a time what he sought to draw down on his in, did there come. . d I . secur~ty epos~t? 20 A Yes.\n\n21 22 Q A Do you recall when that was, approximately? Within a year of closing,\n\n23 Q Do you recall, roughly, of the 3 million, I think 24 you said \\$3.3 million security deposit, how much he wanted to 25 draw down?\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 65 of 126\n\n64\n\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | I
believe
it
was
approximately
2.3
million.
A |\n| 2 | And
did
the
Sherry-Netherland
accede
to
that
Q |\n| 3 | request,
to
your
knowledge? |\n| 4 | No.
A |\n| 5 | Q
Has
any
other
purchaser
of
a
Sherry-Netherland |\n| 6 | apartment,
shortly
after
purchasing,
sought
to
withdrlw
their |\n| 7 | security
deposit? |\n| 8 | A
No. |\n| 9 | Did
there
come
a
time
whether
Mr.
Kwok,
or
someone
Q |\n| 10 | acting
on
his
behalf,
inquired
about
transferring
the
title |\n| 11 | of
the
apartment? |\n| 12 | Yes.
A |\n| 13 | What
do
you
recall
about
that?
Q |\n| 14 | A
I
recall
first
that
his
broker,
Kathy
Sloane,
had |\n| 15 | I
approached
me
and
said,
can
they
transfer
the
apartment
to |\n| 16 | his
son,
Mileson
Kwok's,
name. |\n| 17 | Was
it
in
his
name,
or
was
it
in
a
trust
for
his
Q |\n| 18 | name? |\n| 19 | At
the
time
they
didn't
say
to
trust.
They
just
A |\n| 20 | said
they
wanted
to
transfer
it
to
Mileson. |\n| 21 | And
Mileson
is
Mr.
Kwok's
son;
correct?
Q |\n| 22 | A
Correct. |\n| 23 | Did
there
come
a
time
when
you
learned
that
the
Q |\n| 24 | request
was
to
transfer
to
a
trust
for
,Mr.
Kwok's
son? |\n| 25 | A
Yes,
when
I
received
a
letter
from
an
attorhey
in
I |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 66 of 126\n\n- -----------------------------------,-----------\n\n65 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 England, I believe a Ms. Mannis, I believe, asking questions 2 on how they could do the transfer. 3 Q And the request was how to set up a transfe~ from 4 Mr. Kwok to Mr. Kwok' s son? 5 6 7 8 A Q A Q Correct. A trust for Mr. Kwok's son? Yes. That's correct. And did the Sherry-Netherland respond to that 9 request? 10 11 12 A Q A Yes. How did the Sherry-Netherland respond? We told them how it could be done, that his son 13 14 15 16 would have to go through the application process and provide all of the documentation that he had provided, that M~. Kwok had provided, when he purchased the apartment, and thly could go through that process. 17 18 19 Q A Q So that was a re-board approval process? That's correct. And that was consistent with the board's standard 20 practice in situations such as that? 21 22 A Q Yes. Did Mr. Kwok every end up submitting a transfer 23 application? 24 25 A Q No. Did he or his representatives make any other I Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n| | 66
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff
by |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | requests
about
the
apartment
in
the
period
that
followed? |\n| 2 | Not
that
I
recall.
A |\n| 3 | Well,
did
there
come
a
time
when
Mr.
Kwok
inquired
Q |\n| 4 | about
making
his
son
the
contact
person? |\n| 5 | A
Yes. |\n| 6 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection.
Leading.
He
answered |\n| 7 | the
question
that
he
made
no
other
requests. |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry? |\n| 9 | MR.
HARMON:
Leading.
The
witness
has
already |\n| 10 | answered
that
Mr.
Kwok
made
no
other
requests.
Now
he |\n| 11 | is
leading
the
witness
into
a
different
answer. |\n| 12 | MR.
SARNOFF:
I
can
show
the
witness
His |\n| 13 | deposition
testimony
to
refresh\"
his
recollectioj,
if
he |\n| 14 | would
like. |\n| 15 | MR.
HARMON:
Deposition
testimony
isn't\"
the |\n| 16 | answer
to
what
he
is
asking. |\n| 17 | |\n| 18 | Q |\n| 19 | A |\n| 20 | representatives
asking
whether
they
could
change
the
contact |\n| 21 | person,
and
could
they
make
it
his
son,
as
the
contaot |\n| 22 | person. |\n| 23 | And
this
was
on
the
heels
of
asking
to
transfer
Q |\n| 24 | title
to
his
son,
in
a
trust
for
his
son;
correct? |\n| 25 | Yes.
A |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n126\n\n67 **Ullman. for Plaintiff. Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 THE COURT: What do you mean by contact person? THE WITNESS: In the apartment, they had contact people. They had administrative people fhat, if we needed to get in touch with them, that's who re should go through. There were a couple of different people, and then they asked if they could change it to his son. THE COURT: Okay. 10 Q Did you have a view as to what Mr. Kwok may have 11 been trying to accomplish in doing that? 12 13 14 MR. HARMON: Objection, your Honor. What his view is, again, is irrelevant. THE COURT: I agree. That's sustained. 15 Q When Mr. Kwok purchased the apartment, did he and 16 Genever execute any agreements with the building? 17 A Other than the occupancy agreement and the security 18 deposit and the -- occupancy, security and personal 19 guarantee, those are the three documents, plus signing the 20 proprietary lease. Q 22 lease? And the Sherry-Netherland signed the proprietary 23 24 A Q That's correct. And Mr. Kwok personally signed the occupancy 25 agreement; correct? Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n126\n\n68 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 A Q I believe that's correct; yes. And that was an agreement with the 3 Sherry-Netherland, and that document was in English, and 4 Mr. Kwok signed it; correct? 5 A That's correct. 6 7 Q Do you recall lease and the occupancy 8 do, and if you could pledge your apartment? is not the subject of this action. 9 10 11 12 MR. HARMON: Objection, or not Mr. Kwok's actions violate the relevance. your Honor. Whether . I the proprietar¥ lease I I don't understand 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 THE COURT: I'm sorry? Mr. Kwok purchased the apartment in his own name. MR. HARMON: Y,?s. THE COURT: He signed the proprietary !lease. MR. HARMON: Yes. THE COURT: He signed the occupancy agreement. I He signed the personal guarantee. The rules of the Sherry-Netherland are that you can't pledge the apartment. Mr. Kwok pledged the apartment. Did you find out about that? THE WITNESS: Later, yes. THE COURT: Okay. 25 Q How did you learn about that? **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 69 of 126\n\n68 of 125\n\n| | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
Page 70 of |\n|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 69 |\n| | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff |\n| 1 | A
When
we
were
served
the
papers
from
O'Melveny
is |\n| 2 | the
first
that
we
knew
that,
that
we
read
that
the
aplrtment |\n| 3 | had
been
pledged. |\n| 4 | And
the
papers
that
you
saw
were
the
papers
that
Q |\n| 5 | Mr.
Kwok
had
signed,
that
his
lawyers
had
sent
in,
too; |\n| 6 | right? |\n| 7 | A
Yes. |\n| 8 | Can
you
direct
your
attention
to
PX
33?
Q |\n| 9 | (Whereupon,
an
exhibit
was
displayed
to
the |\n| 10 | Court.
) |\n| 11 | A
Okay. |\n| 12 | MR.
HARMON:
I
don't
have
a
PX
33
in
my
book. |\n| 13 | That
was
provided
by
your
firm? |\n| 14 | |\n| | MR.
SARNOFF:
It's
your
brief. |\n| 15 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the |\n| 16 | witness.
) |\n| 17 | Q
I
direct
your
attention
to
page
four,
please.
f'
\",
I |\n| 18 | h
b
MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor,
t
e
r1e
1S
not
in |\n| 19 | evidence.
He
can't
read
from
a
document
that's
hot
in
I |\n| 20 | evidence,
and
he
can't
authenticate
this
document. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
I
don't
have
Exhibit
33. |\n| 22 | MR.
HOPLAMAZIAN:
Your
Honor,
we
have
a
copy |\n| 23 | for
you,
as
well. |\n| 24 | (Whereupon,
a
document
was
handed
to
the |\n| 25 | Court.
) |\n\n-------------------------,----------\n\n70\n\n| | by
Ullman.
for
Plaintiff.
Direct
Sarnoff |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | THE
COURT:
We
are
not
going
to
have
questions |\n| 2 | about
a
memorandum
of
law.
Let's
move
on. |\n| 3 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Okay. |\n| 4 | Was
it
your
understanding
that
in
this
case
Q |\n| 5 | Mr.
Kwok,
through
his
brief,
was
representing
to
the
Court |\n| 6 | that
the
apartment
was
pledged? |\n| 7 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor.
On |\n| 8 | multiple
grounds. |\n| 9 | THE
COURT:
Sustained.
Sustained,
sustained. |\n| 10 | MR.
SARNOFF:
May
I
address
that? |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
Look,
we
have
already
established |\n| 12 | .11
th
t
M
K
k
h
d
h
d
a
r.
wo
purc
ase
t
e
apartment
an
,
~n
v~o
at~on |\n| 13 | of
his
proprietary
lease,
he
pledged
the
apartmeht,
and |\n| 14 | we
have
established
that
this
witness
learned
abbut
that |\n| 15 | at
a
subsequent
period
of
time,
and
it
has
been |\n| 16 | stipulated
that,
at
le~st
as
of
a
month
ago,
the |\n| 17 | apartment
is
no
longer
pledged. |\n| 18 | Q
Did
you
notify
Mr.
Kwok
that
his
apartment
was |\n| 19 | pledged
in
violation
of
the
Sherry-Netherland
agreemeht? |\n| 20 | A
Yes. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
When
did
you
do
that? |\n| 22 | THE
WITNESS:
Shortly
after
we
found
out
that |\n| 23 | it
had
been
pledged. |\n| 24 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
And
when
was
that? |\n| 25 | THE
WITNESS:
I'm
guessing
now,
around |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 72 of\n\n> 71 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 3 4 5 6 Q THE COURT: Don't guess. Don't guess. THE WITNESS: - - mid 2017. THE COURT: 2017 is your answer? THE WITNESS: Yes. THE COURT: Okay. Did you get a response from Mr. Kwok or Mr. Kwok's 7 counsel -- 8 9 10 11 A Q Yes. -- with respect to the letter? And how did they respond? MR. HARMON: Objection, your Honor. If it's 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 in writing, then document has to be offered, and I would argue that the whole -- THE COURT: I'm sorry? MR. HARMON: If we responded in writing, then we ought to have the exhibit, the document, and hot his testimony. I would object to the document, becalse how he responded to the Sherry-Netherland about this subject is just not relevant to the subject that we are here on today. MR. SARNOFF: I'll show you the exhibit, sir. It's exhibit 35. (Whereupon, a document was handed to the witness. ) MR. HARMON: Your Honor -- Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n126\n\n**Ullman - for Plaintiff - Direct by Sarnoff**\n\n1 2 Q MR. SARNOFF: I would like to mark Exhibit 35. Is that a copy of the written response that the 3 4 5 Sherry-Netherland, and that you, particularly, recei viedin response to your letter to the Sherry-Nether~and, ad~ising them about the inappropriate pledge? 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A Q Yes. What does the letter say about whether or not THE COURT: The letter -- MR. HARMON: Objection. THE COURT: Are you moving this into ewidence? MR. SARNOFF: Yes. THE COURT: Okay. This is received. It 13 14 speaks for itself. MR. SARNOFF: Okay. 15 Q And it was your understanding that the 16 Sherry-Netherland was being told by Mr. Kwok's counsel 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Q response, THE COURT: I can read. MR. HARMON: Objection, THE COURT: I can read the letter. MR. SARNOFF: Okay. Fair enough. THE COURT: It's in evidence. MR. SARNOFF: Okay. Are you able to reconcile the Sherry-Nether[and's of Mr. Kwok's counsel to the SherrY-Netherllnd, 25 with the position that Mr. Kwok's brief and the Wang Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 74 of\n\n| | | 73
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
by
Sarnoff | |\n|----|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| 1 | affidavit | took
with
respect
-- | |\n| 2 | | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained.
That's | |\n| 3 | | sustained. | |\n| 4 | | MR.
HARMON:
Thank
you. | |\n| 5 | Q | Let
me
just
wrap
up
quickly.
Do
you
have
an
ax
to | |\n| 6 | grind
with | Mr.
Kwok? | |\n| 7 | A | Absolutely
not. | |\n| 8 | Q | Didn't
he
sue
you? | |\n| 9 | A | He
did. | |\n| 10 | Q | Is
that
of
any
impact
on
your
testimony? | |\n| 11 | A | Absolutely
not. | |\n| 12 | Q | Was
your
purpose
coming
here
today
to
try
to
help | |\n| 13 | PAX
LP
to | win
its
motion? | |\n| 14 | A | No. | |\n| 15 | Q | Did
you
volunteer
to
testify
here,
or
were
you | |\n| 16 | subpoenaed? | | |\n| 17 | A | Subpoenaed. | |\n| 18 | Q | Is
that
the
same
with
your
deposition? | |\n| 19 | A | Yes. | |\n| 20 | Q | Did
you
and
I
communicate
in
advance
about
your | |\n| 21 | testimony? | | |\n| 22 | A | No. | |\n| 23 | Q | Did
you
tell
the
truth
today? | |\n| 24 | A | Yes. | |\n| 25 | Q | Let
me
just.
see
if
I
can
summarize
your
testimony
I | |\n| | | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n| | | | |\n\n126\n\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
Page 75 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | 126 |\n| | 74
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Direct
Sarnoff
by |\n| 1 | briefly.
I
have
one
ultimate
question
I
would
like
tr
ask |\n| 2 | you,
and
can
you
please
tell
me
if
I've
got
anything
wrong. |\n| 3 | You
testified
he
didn't
show
any
U.S.
assets
or
assetl
in
his. |\n| 4 | own
name;
correct? |\n| 5 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor.
This
is |\n| 6 | •
just
summarizing
the
testimony
that's
already
in
the |\n| 7 | record.
It's
leading,
it's
-- |\n| 8 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained.
I've
heard
his |\n| 9 | testimony. |\n| 10 | MR.
SARNOFF:
Okay. |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
I
don't
need
it
summarized.
Do |\n| 12 | you
have
any
other
questions. |\n| 13 | Did
you
believe
Mr.
Kwok's
behavior
Q |\n| 14 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection. |\n| 15 | with
respect
to
his
apartment
was
typica~?
Q |\n| 16 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained
as
well. |\n| 18 | Q
Did
you
ever
form
a
view
about
what
Mr.
Kwokmay |\n| 19 | have
been
trying
to
accomplish
with
the
apartment? |\n| 20 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
That's
sustained
as
well. |\n| 22 | Thank
you,
Mr.
Ullman.
Q |\n| 23 | MR.
SARNOFF:
I'll
reserve
any
questions
for |\n| 24 | re-direct. |\n| 25 | |\n| | |\n\n| | | by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff.
Cross
Harmon | | 75 |\n|----|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----|\n| 1 | CROSS
EXAMINATION | | | |\n| 2 | BY
MR. | HARMON: | | |\n| 3 | Q | Good
afternoon
Mr.
Ullman. | | |\n| 4 | A | Good
afternoon. | | |\n| 5 | Q | I'm
Mark
Harmon.
We
haven~t
met
before.
I | | |\n| 6 | represent | Mr.
Kwok. | | |\n| 7 | | Mr.
Ullman,
would
you
say
that
Mr.
Kwok's | English | |\n| 8 | is
not
very | good? | | |\n| 9 | A | I
--
yes. | | |\n| 10 | Q | And
especially
it
wasn't
good
several
years | ago. | |\n| 11 | It
may
have | gotten
better,
but
it
certainly | | |\n| 12 | A | It's
gotten
a
lot
better. | | |\n| 13 | | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
Allow
the
question | to
be | |\n| 14 | | completed. | | |\n| 15 | | THE
WITNESS:
Yes. | | |\n| | Q | | | |\n| | A | | | |\n| | Q | | | |\n| | A | | | |\n| | Q | | | |\n| | A | | | |\n| | Q | | | |\n| | that
the | | | |\n| 24 | event
that | a
contract
of
sale
is
to
be
signed
for
the | sale | of |\n| 25 | the
apartment; | is
that
correct? | | |\n| | | Lisa\"
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 77 of 126\n\n| | 76
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
by
Harmon | |\n|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| 1 | A
That's
correct. | |\n| 2 | You
were
given
a
copy
of
that
'order
by
the
Q | |\n| 3 | plaintiffs
here;
is
that
correct? | |\n| 4 | A
That's
correct. | |\n| 5 | Q
So
if
you
knew,
as
the
Chief
Operating
Offirer
of | |\n| 6 | the
Sherry-Netherland,
that
Mr.
Kwok
or
Genever
had
entered | |\n| 7 | d
I
1nto
a
contract
of
sale,
would
you
so
a
V1se
the
Court? | |\n| 8 | Yes.
A | |\n| 9 | Because
you
would
want
to
comply
with
that?
Q | |\n| 10 | Absolutely.
A | |\n| 11 | Q
Okay.
Now
you
also
said
that
you
got
served
papers | |\n| 12 | I
that
indicated
to
you
that
Mr.
Kwok
had
placed
a
pledge
on | |\n| 13 | the
apartment;
is
that
right? | |\n| 14 | A
That's
correct. | |\n| 15 | Q
And
isn't
it
true,
Mr.
Ullman,
that
those
papers | |\n| 16 | were
delivered
to
you
before
the
order
was
entered
thit | |\n| 17 | required
Mr.
Kwok
to
give
notice? | |\n| 18 | I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
question.
A | |\n| 19 | MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor,
this
will
be
a | |\n| 20 | defendant's
exhibit.
Would
you
like
us
to
start
with
A, | |\n| 21 | or
Defendant's
1?
I
have
them,
but
I
just
need
to
fill | |\n| 22 | in
the
exhibit
number. | |\n| 23 | THE
COURT:
Exhibit
1? | |\n| 24 | MR.
HARMON:
Defendant's,
Exhibit
A
or
1? | |\n| 25 | It's
not
pre-marked. | |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 78 of 126\n\n> 77 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Cross by Harmon** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I'm just asking your Honor for your preference in how we THE COURT: Did you hand up your exhibit book? MR. HARMON: No, your Honor. We have bne exhibit book, and then these are just for cross. This is - - THE COURT: I'm sorry? MR. HARMON: No, your Honor. THE COURT: Okay. So then I need a copy of the exhibit. MR. HARMON: I'm going to give it to you. THE COURT: Give it to the court officlr. MR. HARMON: We'll make it Defendant's A. (Whereupon, a document was handed to the Court. ) MR. HARMON: Your Honor, may I hand a copy to the witness? THE COURT: Yes. MR. HARMON: Thank you. (Whereupon, a document was handed to the witness. ) 22 Q Mr. Ullman, you have been handed what's been marked 23 for identification as Defendant's Exhibit A. Can you tell us 24 what it is? 25 A It's an email from my assistant to Ira GilbFrt, Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n78 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Cross by Harmon** 1 copying me, regarding 2 Q Well, don't tell me what it's regarding. Is there 3 an attachment to the email? 4 5 A Q Yes. Is that attachment a copy of a letter that you 6 signed? 7 8 A Q That's my signature. Yes. In your official capacity as Executive vice 9 President and Chief Operating Officer of the 10 Sherry-Netherland; correct? 11 12 A Yes. MR. HARMON: Your Honor, I offer it as 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendant's Exhibit A in evidence. THE COURT: Okay. It's received. MR. SARNOFF: No objection. Q Now, Mr. Ullman, would you like to take a look to your first and second paragraph of the letter? That' slpage two of the exhibit. 19 20 A Q Yes. Do you see that the corporation was provided with a 21 copy of the order on June 29, 2018? 22 23 A Q Yes. And approximately two months before that is when 24 the plaintiffs supplied copies of the documents to you about 25 their lawsuit with Mr. Kwok; is that correct? Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n| | | Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Harmon
by | 79 |\n|----|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|\n| 1 | A | Yes. | |\n| 2 | Q | So
the
answer
to
my
earlier
question
was
whether | |\n| 3 | you
received | the
information
about
the
pledge
before
bhe | |\n| 4 | order
was | entered,
and
the
answer
is
yes. | |\n| 5 | A | Yes. | |\n| 6 | Q | And
you
received
it
from
the
plaintiffs,
is
that | |\n| 7 | correct? | From
the
plaintiffs
in
this
case? | |\n| 8 | A | Yes. | |\n| 9 | Q | I
know
you
gave
a
fair
amount
of
testimony
about | |\n| 10 | the
putting | together
of
the
documents,
amassing
the | |\n| 11 | documents. | I
presume
whatever
financial
information
you | |\n| 12 | received | from
or
on
behalf
of
Mr.
Kwok,
you
turned
ov~r
to | |\n| 13 | the
board. | | |\n| 14 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 15 | Q | Is
it
fair
to
say
that
there
was
no
informafion | |\n| 16 | that
was | given
to
you
that
you
didn't
give
to
the
board? | |\n| 17 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 18 | Q | And
then
the
board
reviewed
the
information~ | |\n| 19 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 20 | Q | And
the
board
then
voted
on
whether
or
not
to | |\n| 21 | accept
Mr. | Kwok
as
a
apartment
owner
at
the | |\n| 22 | Sherry-Netherland? | | |\n| 23 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 24 | Q | And
the
board
voted
the
first
time
that
the | |\n| 25 | information | was
inadequate;
is
that
right? | |\n\n126\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 81 of 126\n\n| | | by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff.
Cross
Harmon | 80 |\n|----|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------|\n| 1 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 2 | Q | And
asked
for
additional
information? | |\n| 3 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 4 | Q | And
additional
information
was
provided? | |\n| 5 | A | That's
correct. | |\n| 6 | Q | The
board
received
it? | |\n| 7 | A | Yes. | |\n| 8 | Q | The
board
voted? | |\n| 9 | A | Yes. | |\n| 10 | Q | The
board
approved? | |\n| 11 | A | Yes. | |\n| 12 | Q | The
board
knew
there
was
a
limited
time
period | that |\n| 13 | Mr.
Kwok | was
giving
in
order
to
approve;
correct? | |\n| 14 | A | Yes. | |\n| 15 | Q | And
they
voted
to
approve
him
as
a
tenant? | |\n| 16 | A | Yes. | |\n| 17 | Q | So
they
.knewhe
had
no
U.S.
assets;
correct? | |\n| 18 | A | Yes. | |\n| 19 | QThey | knew
he
had
no
assets
in
his
own
name; | |\n| 20 | correct? | | |\n| 21 | A | Yes. | |\n| 22 | Q | And
they
approved
him
as
a
cooperative
owner? | |\n| 23 | A | Yes. | |\n| 24 | Q | They
required
a
security
deposit? | |\n| 25 | A | Yes. | |\n\n| | 81
by
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Cross
Harmon |\n|-------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Q | Mr.
Kwok
provided
the
security
deposit? |\n| A | Yes. |\n| Q | As
of
this
day,
how
'much
of
a
security
deposit
has |\n| been
used | to
pay
his
maintenance
charges? |\n| A | None. |\n| Q | So
the
person
from
whom
Mr.
Kwok
purchased
the |\n| apartment, | do
you
know
in
what
form
that
apartment
wab
held? |\n| Do
you
know | who
the
owner
was? |\n| A | Yes. |\n| Q | And
who
was
the
owner? |\n| A | It
was
Gilbert
Haroche,
and
I
believe
it
was
in
an |\n| LLC. | |\n| Q | So
the
apartment
was
purchased
from
somebody
who |\n| held
the | apartment
in
an
LLC;
correct? |\n| A | Yes. |\n| Q | And
Mr.
Horvitz,
in
what
capacity
does
he
own
his |\n| apartment? | I trust?
Doesn't
he
own
this
apartment
through
a |\n| A | I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that,
offhand. |\n| Q | There
are
many
people
in
the
Sherry
who
own
their |\n| apartment | through
an
entity;
is
that
correct? |\n| A | Yes. |\n| Q | And
the
Sherry
knew
that
Mr.
Kwok
was
buying
the |\n| apartment | through
an
entity;
correct? |\n| A | Yes |\n| Q | And
they
approved
it? |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n#### 1 A **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Cross by Harmon** Yes. 82 2 Q Now, you said that there came a time when Mr. Kwok, 3 or someone on his behalf, inquired about transferring the 4 apartment to his son? 5 6 A Q Yes. Okay. And so that was an inquiry, How do we go 7 about doing that; is that correct? 8 A Yes. 9 10 Q And the Sherry-Netherland responded. Mr. Kwok how he should go about doing that, if You told I he wanted to 11 do it; correct? 12 13 14 15 16 17 A Q A Q A Q That's correct. And he didn't. That's correct. So nothing ever came of it? That's correct. And you said that. at some time Mileson, that's 18 Mr. Kwok's son, wanted to be the contact person? NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 83 of 126\n\n19 A That's correct.\n\n20 Q Who is the contact person now?\n\n21 A The contact person that I generally use is Brenda. 22 Brenda Tsang, I think is her last name.\n\n,23 Q Not Mr. Kwok?\n\n24 A No.\n\n25\n\nQ Because Brenda speaks English well; correct? I\n\n\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\nB4 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Cross by Harmon** 1 was, yes. I was on the phone call. 2 3 4 Q And in that board meeting, did Mr. Horvitz make a I presentation about someone who made a personal reference to support Mr. Kwok's application? 5 6 7 B 9 10 11 12 A Q A Q A Q A Q Yes. And that was an architect in Taiwan? Either Taiwan or Hong Kong. I don't remember. Somebody who was known to Mr. Horvitz? Yes. I berieve that's correct. And that person vouched for Mr. Kwok? Very highly. Very highly. And among the other documents that 13 were submitted in connection with the approval process, there \"14 were reference letters; weren't there? 15 16 A Q Yes, there were. And one of the reference letters was submitted by 17 the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blair; 1B \"is that right? 19 20 21 A Q That's correct. Thank you. MR. HARMON: I have nothing else. 22 RE-DIRECT EXAMINATION 23 BY MR. SARNOFF: 24 25 Q A Mr. Horvitz, I just have two follow up questions. No. I'm not Mr. Horvitz. Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n85 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Re-Direct by Sarnoff** 1 2 Q No. Mr. Ullman. Sorry. THE COURT: I'm sorry? 3 4 5 6 MR. SARNOFF: I said Mr. Horvitz. My jrror. Q Mr. Harmon asked you questions about whether other purchasers used an LLC to buy their apartment. Just fO be clear, no one has used a double LLC, and no one has used a 7 foreign LLC. Is that fair? 8 A That's fair. 9 10 11 Q And Mr. Harmon asked you whether you unders~ood that you would receive, that the Sherry-Netherland WOlld receive notice if Mr. Kwok were to enter into a contrlct to 12 sell his apartment; is that correct? 13 14 A Q Correct. But if Mr. Kwok transferred the ownership of the 15 foreign LLC that the ultimate owner, would the 16 Sherry-Netherland necessarily get notice of that? 17 18 A Q We should get notice of it. But as it's set up now, if Mr. Kwok didn't tell 19 you, and went out and did that, would you get notice? 20 That wouldn't be something that happens through the 21 building; would it? 22 A Correct. 23 24 25 THE COURT: I don't understand. An apartment in the Sherry-Netherland can't transfer without lpproval of the Sherry-Netherland board; correct. Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n\n| | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
Page 87 of |\n|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
126 |\n| | 86
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Re-Direct
by
Sarnoff |\n| | |\n| 1 | THE
WITNESS:
That's
correct. |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
So
if
the
owner
of
this
apirtment |\n| 3 | sought
to
transfer
ownership
of
this
apartment,
that |\n| 4 | couldn't
be
accomplished
without
the
approval
of
the |\n| 5 | Sherry-Netherland. |\n| 6 | THE
WITNESS:
That's
correct. |\n| 7 | THE
COURT:
So
what
was
the
response
to
the |\n| 8 | last
question? |\n| 9 | THE
WITNESS:
I |\n| 10 | May
I?
Q |\n| 11 | A
Yeah.
Go. |\n| 12 | Q
The
ownership
structure
is
that
the
New
York
LLC |\n| 13 | that
owns
the
apartment
is
owned
by
a
B.V.I
LLC
that
lwns
the |\n| 14 | New
York
apartment,
that
owns
--
and
Mr.
Kwok
is
the
lltimate |\n| 15 | beneficial
owner. |\n| 16 | Whatf
I
was
asking
was
whether
or
not,
if
Mr.
Kwok |\n| 17 | transferred,
to
some
other
party,
ownership
of
the
B.V.I
LLC; |\n| 18 | the
board
wouldn't
necessarily
know
it.
It
wouldn't
lnvolve |\n| 19 | I
a
new
purchase
or
sale
agreement,
and
he
could
transfer
the |\n| 20 | LLC
ownership
to
a
third
party,
away
from
himself,
an1
it |\n| 21 | wouldn't
be
his
any
more,
even
though
the
SherrY-Nethirland |\n| 22 | I
board
did
not
enter
into
a
new
purchase
or
sale
contract
for |\n| 23 | the
apartment.
That
was
the |\n| 24 | THE
COURT:
I
don't
think
that's
the
witness's |\n| 25 | testimony. |\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n.\n\n| | 87
Ullman
-
for
Plaintiff
-
Re-Direct
Sarnoff
by |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | MR.
HARMON:
It's
not. |\n| 2 | A
Go
back
and
ask
me
the
question
again. |\n| 3 | You
would
be
involved
if
the
LLC
in
New
York
were
Q |\n| 4 | to
sell
the
property;
correct? |\n| 5 | A
If
the
LLC,
which
Mr.
Kwok
controls,
sells
the |\n| 6 | apartment,
there
would
be
a
purchase-sale.
Yes. |\n| 7 | Q.
But
if
the
apartment
is
not
involved
in
a
purchase |\n| 8 | 'ore1gn
fl,er,
1S\"1
d'
f
1
b
h
or
sa
e,
ut
t
e
LLC
1nvo
ve
1n
a
trans
1t |\n| 9 | necessar1'I
'ld
'
I
wouldn't
y
come
to
your
attent1on;
wou
1t~ |\n| 10 | No.
A |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
But
it
wouldn't
be
binding.
There |\n| 12 | can
be
no
transfer
of
an
apartment. |\n| 13 | THE
WITNESS:
Well,
legally |\n| 14 | THE
COURT:
As
far
as
you
understand,
absent |\n| 15 | I
approval
of
the
board
of
directors,
no
unit
of
the |\n| 16 | Sherry-Netherland
can
be
transferred
to
anybody. |\n| 17 | THE
WITNESS:
That's
correct. |\n| 18 | MR.
HARMON:
Can
I
ask
a
few
questions
on |\n| 19 | that? |\n| 20 | THE
COURT:
I
think
I
understand
this,
really. |\n| 21 | It's
not
that
complicated.
Go
ahead.
Ask
your |\n| 22 | questions. |\n| 23 | MR.
HARMON:
Thank
you.
I
will
be
really |\n| 24 | quick |\n| 25 | Mr.
Ullman,
when
somebody
buys
an
apartment
at
the
Q |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 89 of 126\n\n88 **Ullman - for Plaintiff - Re-Direct by Sarnoff** 1 Sherry-Netherland, they are issued. a stock certificate; 2 correct? 3 4 A Q Yes. And the Sherry-Netherland keeps the records of who 5 the owner of that shock certificate is? 6 7 A Q That's correct. And in order for that stock certificate to be 8 transferred to another name, to be re-registered, the 9 Sherry-Netherland has to approve that. 10 A That's correct. 11 12 13 14 Q So if somebody came in and presented *you* with a stock certificate registered in somebody -- transferr~d to somebody else, the Sherry-Netherland would reject that; wouldn't it? 15 16 A Q That's correct. And the Sherry-Netherland would not issue a 17 proprietary lease to that person; correct? 18 19 A Q That's correct. So that the Sherry-Netherland, as far as you are 20 concerned, the owner is Genever, and Genever has the 21 proprietary lease, and that's the Sherry's position; correct? 22 23 24 25 A That's correct. MR. HARMON: Thank *you.* THE COURT: Okay. Next witness. (Whereupon, the witness was excused fr0m the I . Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n## **Proceedings**\n\nwitness stand.)\n\n1\n\n2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 MR. HARMON:' Your Honor, I did ~ot wanr to speak out of turn, but I think the next w~tness ~s a presentation of a video deposition of Mr. Horvitl, and perhaps we can save some time if we could submit the transcript that plaintiffs and we have marked with our objections to various portions, and your Honor CfUld read the transcript, and we don't have to take up your time any more than -- THE COURT: No, no, no, no, no. I want to hear the whole case here and now. MR. HARMON: Okay. THE COURT: I don't want to go back ana start reading things, and objections. MR. HARMON: That's fine. 16 17 MS. SEARLES: I just had a question, clarification, because we haven't spoken about for I this 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 before. We designated and cross designated, and there were objections to certain select portions. My question to you is, did you put the cross designations, otr cross designations in that you did not object to? Is ~hiS part of this video presentation. MR. MOSS: We put all of your cross designations in. 25 MS. SEARLES: Okay. And you put all of yours I\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\n# Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 91 of\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n\n| | 90
Proceedings | |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| 1 | in,
irrespective
of
objections
on
either
side? | |\n| 2 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes. | |\n| 3 | MS.
SEARLES:
Okay. | |\n| 4 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes.
Everything
you
cross | |\n| 5 | designated
is
in
here,
to
the
extent
--
we
are
not | |\n| 6 | playing
the
whole
thing. | |\n| 7 | Your
Honor,
this
is
Michael
Horvitz.
Michael | |\n| 8 | Horvitz,
you
have
heard,
is
the
Chairman
and
prebident | |\n| 9 | Sherry-Netherland. | |\n| 10 | When
Mr.
Kwok
applied
to
the
board
to
purchase | |\n| 11 | the
apartment
he
submitted
financial
information. | |\n| 12 | Mr.
Horvitz
reviewed
that
financial
information
lnd
he | |\n| 13 | I
recommended
to
the
board
that
they
approve
the
purchase | |\n| 14 | based
on
that
financial
information.
First
I
jubt
want | |\n| 15 | to
walk
through
some
of
his
testimony,
because
I
think | |\n| 16 | it
will
be
more
efficient
than
the
video,
to
just
show | |\n| 17 | you
the | |\n| 18 | THE
COURT:
I
just
want
to
hear
the
testimony. | |\n| 19 | I
don't
want
any
demonstratives.
I've
got
two
flet
of | |\n| 20 | paper
from
the
parties
about
this. | |\n| 21 | MR.
MOSS:
Fair
enough. | |\n| 22 | THE
COURT:
This
is
an
evidentiary
hearing,
so | |\n| 23 | just
present
the
evidence. | |\n| 24 | MR.
MOSS:
All
right.
Mr.
Horvitz's | |\n| 25 | testimony. | |\n| | | |\n\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
126 | INDEX NO. 652077/2017
Page 92 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | Proceedings | 91 |\n| 1 | (Video
tape
played.) | |\n| 2 | MS.
SEARLES:
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt. | I'm |\n| 3 | having
a
hard
time
--
I
thought
you
said
that
aU | of
the |\n| 4 | designations
and
cross
designations
were
in
the)e, | but |\n| 5 | this
is
not
--
are
you
not
playing
it
in
order? | |\n| 6 | MR.
MOSS:
No.
Everything
you
countered | |\n\ndesignated, we have put in, to the extent we are not playing all of our designations. That would take 45 minutes.\n\nMS. SEARLES: Okay.\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n16\n\n17\n\n11 MR. MOSS: This is a select clip, and to the extent we are playing something that you counter designated, we are playing your counters.\n\nMS. SEARLES: Okay. The only issue I'm having ~s, thatId' es~gnate d'qu~te a b't~, and' ~t's ~mposs~ , I 'ble for me to figure out what page you are playing hlre. MR. MOSS: Okay.\n\n18 19 MS. SEARLES: I mean, that is clearly started halfway through the day.\n\n20 21 22 MR. MOSS: Okay. I'm happy to -- the page numbers and lines are right there. I'm happy to give you --\n\n23 24 25 MS. SEARLES: I can't see the page number. I can see the line numbers. That may be the issue I'm having.\n\n#### NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n92\n\n| 1 | MR.
MOSS:
Okay.
It's
page
64,
65,
66
and
67. |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
Look,
considering
the
quality
of |\n| 3 | the
firms
involved
here,
I'm
a
little
bit
perPleLed.
If |\n| 4 | you
are
going
to
exhibit
a
deposition,
you
are
gbing
to |\n| 5 | exhibit
everything
that
you
have
designated,
and |\n| 6 | everything
that
they
have
designated,
in
sequence. |\n| 7 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes. |\n| 8 | a;r-e
THE
COURT:
To
the
extent
that
there
I |\n| 9 | ['
11
objections
that
are
asserted
at
the
deposition, |\n| 10 | .1.
rule
on
whether
the
portions
that
you
are
exh~b~t~ng
can |\n| 11 | or
cannot
evidence.
come
into |\n| 12 | MR.
MOSS:
It's
not
quite
right,
your
Honor. |\n| 13 | I
We
both
designated.
It
would
take
probably
an
hour
to |\n| 14 | play
everything
that
we
have
designated.
We.
are
only |\n| 15 | playing
a
10-minute
clip
of
a
portion
of
what
we
have |\n| 16 | designated,
because
it
would
take
too
long
to
play
the |\n| 17 | entire
thing. |\n| 18 | MR.
SARNOFF:
And
everything
that
she |\n| 19 | designated. |\n| 20 | MR.
MOSS:
And
everything
-- |\n| 21 | MR.
HARMON:
Why
isn't
the
transcript
being
-- |\n| 22 | MS.
SEARLES:
My
understanding
was
that
they |\n| 23 | intended
to
offer
everything
that
they
Originallt |\n| 24 | designated. |\n| 25 | MR.
MOSS:
Our
understanding
is
that
all
of
I |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 94 of\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 **Proceedings** the testimony that has been designated is in evi~ence. THE COURT: Look, Mr. Horvitz is up at the Sherry-Netherland; right? MR. MOSS: Yes. THE COURT: You could have had him come here; right. 126\n\n7 8 MR. MOSS: Oh, no. He lives in Cleveland. THE COURT: I'm sorry?\n\n9 10 11 MR. MOSS: He lives in Cleveland. He is the president of the board, but he resides and lives full time in Cleveland.\n\n> THE COURT: Okay.\n\n> > MR. MOSS:\n\nMR. MOSS: He is unavailable.\n\nTHE COURT: So he's an out-of-state witness.\n\n16 17 THE COURT: deposition. And therefore, are you playing his\n\nYes.\n\n18 MR. MOSS: Correct.\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n15\n\n25\n\n19 THE COURT: Have you been able to come to an 20 21 22 23 24 agreement as to how you are going to exhibit the portions of the deposition that you want me to see? MR. MOSS: Well, our understanding was that we have designated it, and your Honor has the designations, so that to the extent there weren't objections, !hat\n\n> would be in evidence. We were only going to Pla~ a I\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 95 of 126\n\n**Proceedings**\n\n94\n\n| 1 | selection
of
that
today,
because
playing
the
entire |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | thing
would,
again,
take
an
hour. |\n| 3 | THE
COURT:
I'm
only
going
to
consider
what
I |\n| 4 | see
in
this
court. |\n| 5 | MR.
MOSS:
Okay. |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
Those
are
my
rules.
So
go
ahead. |\n| 7 | MS.
SEARLES:
Just
so
that
I
do
not
get
up
and |\n| 8 | interrupt
again,
I
want
to
make
it
clear,
we
havl |\n| 9 | multiple
relevance
objections
to
some
of
this
tebtimOny |\n| 10 | that's
coming
in.
Do
you
want
me
to
-- |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
Well,
if
they
weren't
asserted
at |\n| 12 | the
deposition
-- |\n| 13 | MS.
SEARLES:
Relevance
is
not
a
deposition |\n| 14 | objection,
so
-- |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Just
proceed. |\n| 16 | (Video
tape
played.
) |\n| 17 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 18 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry? |\n| 19 | MR.
HARMON:
I
object.
He
is
summarizing
more |\n| 20 | testimony
that's
not
before
you. |\n| 21 | THE
COURT:
Overruled. |\n| 22 | (Video
tape
played.
) |\n| 23 | MR.
HARMON:
Objection,
your
Honor. |\n| 24 | Relevance. |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
That's
overruled, |\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\n95\n\n(Video tape played.)\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 MR. HARMON: Your Honor, excuse me. Your Honor, in doing this, they have X-ed out Objectibns to form that were made during the course of this teltimOny, so that you don't see them and you don't hear thlem. THE COURT: L00,k I may be m~ss~ng \" somiI th'~ng. I just heard the last witness testify that the apartment is owned by Genever and that it can't be transfelred to anybody other than Genever without the approval bf the h h k d f ' I I, board, so w et er Mr. Kwo rnae up a a~ry ta e ~n some h h k' k' l'bl other context, or w et er Mr. Kwo ~s ta ~ng ~ ert~es . with the truth isn't really relevant to who owns this apartment. (Video tape played.) MR. MOSS: Our next witness is Mr. -- THE COURT: Do you have cross designations for this deposition? MS. SEARLES: Yes. I just wanted to make two quick points. First of all, the objections that I made during the deposition were excised from the video, so\n\nthere were, at least, a couple of objections.\n\n21\n\n22 23 THE COURT: Okay. I would have overruled them all any way.\n\n24 25 MS. SEARLES: And that's fine. I just wanted to make that point for the record.\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n126\n\n| 1 | The
other
part
was,
he
indicated
that
it
was |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | designations
and
cross
designations.
As
you
notlced, |\n| 3 | there
were
no
cross
designations
in
there
becaus~
the |\n| 4 | sections
of
the
testimony
that
he
used
don't
inc~ude
the |\n| 5 | ones
where
we
have
cross
designations,
so
all
of
our |\n| 6 | cross
designations
occurred
at
different
parts
of
this, |\n| 7 | but
he
is
an
unavailable
witness,
so
I
don't
thihk
they |\n| 8 | are
cross
decisions
in
the
normal
sense
for |\n| 9 | completeness.
We
just
designated
our
own
sections. |\n| 10 | THE
COURT:
He
probably
has
the
abilit~
to |\n| 11 | exhibit
anything
you
want
from
the
deposition,
t~ |\n| 12 | --
present
as |\n| 13 | -
-
MS.
SEARLES:
And
I
apologize |\n| 14 | MR.
MOSS:
And
we
offered
that. |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
as
cross
examination. |\n| 16 | MR.
MOSS:
We
offered
that
in
advance. |\n| 17 | MS.
SEARLES:
No.
I
apologize,
because
when |\n| 18 | you
indicated
that
it
was
going
to
be
-- |\n| 19 | THE
COURT:
Let's
not
squabble
about
who
said |\n| 20 | I
what
to
whom.
If
you
want
to
play
any
portion
of
this |\n| 21 | I
deposition,
you
are
entitled
to
do
so,
and
he
will |\n| 22 | graciously
accommodate
you
by
playing
whatever
pbrtions |\n| 23 | of
the
deposition
you
want
played,
if
any. |\n| 24 | MS.
SEARLES:
Okay.
Give
me
just
one
second, |\n| 25 | Imake
your
Honor,
because
some
of
this
isn't
going
to
as
I |\n| | Lisa
A.
Casey
-
Official
Court
Reporter |\n\n96 of 125\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 97 **Proceedings** much sense without the actual portion that the plaintiffs.have designated. You have, in front of you, you have thj -- THE COURT: I'm not reading anything that isn't presented to me. MS. SEARLES: And that's fine. We'll dust let it be. Thank you. THE COURT: Okay. Next witness. MR. MOSS: We'll call Mr. Kwok. THE COURT: Do we have an interpreter for Mr. Kwok? THE CLERK: Official Court Interpreter, please note your appearance. THE INTERPRETER: Mandarin Chinese Interpreter, first name Tor, T-O-R, last name Huang, H-U-A-N-G. (Whereupon, the Official Court Mandarin Interpreter was duly sworn by the clerk.) K WOK HOW A N, having been duly sworn by the clerk, was examined and testified as follows, with the assis~ance of. the .Official Court Mandarin Interpreter. **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 98 of 126\n\n> 22 23 24 25 THE CLERK: Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth in all the matters before the Court? THE WITNESS: As well, I say, it's true. THE CLERK: Please state your name and\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 99 of 126\n\n| | Proceedings |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | address. |\n| 2 | THE
WITNESS:
Kwok
Ho
Wan
K-W-O-K
H-O
,
'I
' |\n| 3 | W-A-N.
That's
my
name,
and
I
live
at
781
Fifth
Avenue. |\n| 4 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
Have
a
seat. |\n| 5 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
I
don't
want
to
waste |\n| 6 | a
lot
of
time.
The
reason
that
we
are
having
thls |\n| 7 | hearing
is
for
you
to
satisfy
your
burden
for
an
order |\n| 8 | of
attachment,
one
element
of
which
is
that
the |\n| 9 | defendant,
with
intent
to
defraud
his
creditors,
to |\n| 10 | frustrate
the
enforcement
of
a
judgment
that
might
be |\n| 11 | rendered
in
plaintiff's
favor,
has
assigned, |\n| 12 | dispossessed,
encumbered
or
secreted
property,
or |\n| 13 | removed
it
from
the
state,
or
is
about
to
do
any
of |\n| 14 | these
acts.
So
if
it's
the
case
that
this
apartment
at
I |\n| 15 | the
Sherry-Netherland
can
never
be
transferred
without |\n| 16 | the
consent
of
the
Sherry-Netherland,
and
the |\n| 17 | Sherry-Netherland
is
on
notice
that
if
there's
any |\n| 18 | attempt
to
sell
it,
you
have
to
be
provided
advahce |\n| 19 | notice,
and
they
can't
transfer
without
Court
apbroval, |\n| 20 | I
don't
think
we
need
a
lengthy
examination
of
Ml.
Kwok. |\n| 21 | I
MR.
MOSS:
Well,
your
Honor,
given
that
-- |\n| 22 | that's
new
information
that
we
heard
for
the
firlt
time. |\n| 23 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry. |\n| 24 | MR.
MOSS: |\n| 25 | the
first
time
today, |\n\nLisa A. Casey -\n\n-- -------------------\n\n| | 99
Proceedings |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | status.
Maybe
it
makes
sense
to
take
our
lunch
break |\n| 2 | earlier,
for
me
try
to
move
through,
edit
my
outline, |\n| 3 | and
try
to
do
a
lot
less
with
Mr.
Kwok
than
I
wal |\n| 4 | I
originally
intending
to
do,
given
that
that's
YOir
view. |\n| 5 | I'm
happy
to
start
now,
but
I
think
I
can
condense
it |\n| 6 | significantly. |\n| 7 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
You
want
to
take
a |\n| 8 | I
lunch
break
now'?
Is
that
what
you're
telling
me'? |\n| 9 | MR.
MOSS:
I
think
that
would
probably
be
less |\n| 10 | of
a
waste
of
time
for
everybody. |\n| 11 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Because
I'm
not |\n| 12 | ,
d
1n'
wast1ng,
'd
c1,11ent's
1ntereste
you
your
t1me
an
your |\n| 13 | money,
and
I'm
not
interested
in
you
wasting
my
lime. |\n| 14 | MR.
MOSS:
Of
course. |\n| 15 | THE
COURT:
I'll
see
you
back
here
at
two |\n| 16 | o'clock.
Is
that
acceptable'? |\n| 17 | MR.
MOSS:
Sure.
fine,
That's
your
Honor. |\n| 18 | I
THE
COURT:
Is
that
acceptable
with
you,
Paul'? |\n| 19 | THE
CLERK:
Yes.
Thank
you. |\n| 20 | THE
COURT:
Okay.
Is
that
acceptable
to
the |\n| 21 | court
reporter'? |\n| 22 | THE
COURT
REPORTER:
That's
fine.
Thank
you. |\n| 23 | THE
COURT
OFFICER:
tb
2:00
We
are
adjourned |\n| 24 | p.m. |\n| 25 | (Whereupon,
a
recess
was
taken.) |\n\n| | t
100
Proceedings |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | *
*
*
*
*
* |\n| 2 | THE
COURT:
right.
In
this
action,
do
the
All |\n| 3 | plaintiffs
propose
to
proceed
on
the
guarantee
that's |\n| 4 | the
subject
of
this
action? |\n| 5 | MR.
MOSS:
Yes,
your
Honor. |\n| 6 | THE
COURT:
And
what
is
the
position
oiE
the |\n| 7 | plaintiffs
with
respect
to
the
piercing
of
the
cbrporate |\n| 8 | veil
issues? |\n| 9 | MR.
MOSS:
Well,
as
your
Honor
has
requested, |\n| 10 | we
have
amended
our
complaint
to
add
the
Genever |\n| 11 | entities. |\n| 12 | THE
COURT:
I'm
sorry? |\n| 13 | MR.
MOSS:
We
have
amended
our
complaint
to |\n| 14 |
d
h
1
add
the
two
Genever
ent~t~es,
an
our
pos~t~on
~s
t
at |\n| 15 | we
pleaded
facts
in
the
amended
complaint
SUfficlent
to |\n| 16 | make
the
claim
for
veil
piercing. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
right.
But
you
are
not
All |\n| 18 | propos~ng.
bl'~sh
ve~.I
\"
th'~s
hi.ear~ng.
to
esta
p~erc~ng
at |\n| 19 | 1
MR.
MOSS:
Yes,
we
are,
your
Honor.
We
are |\n| 20 | proposing
to
do
both.
We
have
amended
the
compllint
as |\n| 21 | you've
suggested,
and
as
I
laid
out
in
the
openibg,
veil |\n| 22 | piercing
is
one
of
the
things
that
we
intend
to
~rove |\n| 23 | today. |\n| 24 | MR.
HARMON:
Your
Honor
-- |\n| 25 | THE
COURT:
With
respect
to
the
defendant,
is
I |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 102 of 126\n\n101 **Proceedings** 1 2 3 4 5 it the defendant's position that Mr. Kwok residence in the Sherry-Netherland on the and accurate information? MR. HARMON: Submitted to the Sherry-Netherland? purchased the basis bf true 6 7 8 9 THE COURT: I'm sorry. MR. HARMON: Are you asking whether position is that the information submitted to Sherry-Netherland was true and accurate? 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 THE COURT: MR. HARMON: THE COURT: Mr. Kwok's deposition MR. HARMON: THE COURT: MR. HARMON: Yes. Yes. Therefore, you also claim that testimony was true and acclrate? Yes, your Honor. At the time that it was given. Yes, your Honor. 17 18 THE COURT: And inadvertently pledged the you also contend that Mr. Kwok residence to another ehtity 19 20 21 22 23 24 after this litigation was initiated, and when he realized that he. was not entitled to transfer, pledge, I the residence, he arranged for the pledge to be removed. I MR. HARMON: I don't think I can answer your question the way you asked it. The pledge has blen removed. I don't think I'm in a position to ansLer the\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\nrest of your question, but I do want to be clearl your\n\nI\n\n25\n\n#### **Proceedings**\n\nof 126\n\n102\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Honor, that plaintiffs have just recently amendea their complaint. The issue has not been joined on the amended complaint. We have not yet begun to conduct discovery on the merits of the claim. Everything has been directed to the question of the attachment, and so I'm I assuming, and I raised this at the last oral argument, I that once this issue was to be set aside as to whether I or not there will be an attachment, or whether the current order of the Court provides more than adkquate protection to the plaintiff, whether or not they have met the attachment standards, that we will get on and start conducting discovery on the merits, and thlt what we have been doing so far is litigating whether ~r not plaintiffs have established entitlement to attachment, but nothing more than that. No ultimate findingb of fact or conclusions on the merits of the case, bkcause we are only dealing with the attachment issue at this tiine.\n\n19 20 THE COURT: veil piercing, won't Well, if the plaintiff establishes that have some impact on whlt 21 orders the Court should consider issuing?\n\n22 23 24 MR. HARMON: So the short answer is of course, but the longer answer is that I don't think the Court has to reach a final determination of whether or not the 25 plaintiffs have established veil piercing in order I to\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n| 1 | decide
.whether
or
not
the
attachment
is
appropriate
or |\n|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | not.
The
standards
for
determining
proof
at
thil
stage |\n| 3 | are
not
the
same
as
the
standards
for
ultimate |\n| 4 | determination,
and
so
I
would
say
that
whatever
rUling |\n| 5 | you
make
regarding
the
questions
now
before
you
would |\n| 6 | not
represent
final
rulings
on
the
merits
of
the
case, |\n| 7 | which
still
is
yet
to
come,
following
our
completion
of |\n| 8 | discovery. |\n| 9 | So
to
be
clear,
your
Honor,
because
of
the
way |\n| 10 | that
your
Honor
phrased
the
reasons
for
conducting
an |\n| 11 | evidentiary
hearing,
it
was
not
our
intention
to
go
into |\n| 12 | detail
in
depth
about
the
veil
piercing
issue.
[ |\n| 13 | understand
that
you
could
grant
the
attachment
wlthout |\n| 14 | making
a
final
determination,
but
we
were
not
hele
today |\n| 15 | prepared
to
put
on
all
of
the
evidence
regarding
veil |\n| 16 | piercing. |\n| 17 | THE
COURT:
All
right.
Do
we
have
any |\n\nTHE COURT: All right. Do we have any estimated time of arrival of the interpreter?\n\n18\n\n25\n\n19 20 21 22 THE CLERK: No. Just that one was ordered at about 1:00 in the afternoon, and they are coming from the Bronx. They were ordered, I got the email, at 12:51 p.m.\n\n23 24 THE COURT: Okay. So we shouldn't have to wait too much longer.\n\n> Let me ask the plaintiff, as a practical . I\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 105\n\n104\n\n| of 126 |\n|--------|\n| |\n\n**Proceedings**\n\n1\n\nmatter --\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\nMR. MOSS: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: -- how are you better off if an attachment is issued, which is purely discretionary?\n\nMR. MOSS: Better off than with the nOfice order in place? Your Honor, better off between fhe attachment or the notice order? Is that the question? THE COURT: Yes.\n\n9 10 11 MR. MOSS: I think that the main problem, or one of the main problems, with the notice order ks that under the notice order, Mr. Kwok -- I have it ribht 12 here has to provide us with immediate written notice 13 14 15 16 17 once he already has a contract for sale, or assignment of the residence. So at that point, he has alrekdY agreed to sell it to somebody. They may have a flaim against the apartment, even if the Sherry-Netheriand doesn't approve it.\n\n18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Second, it doesn't apply to transfers if Genever, and I know the Court -- and I understana, as a practical matter, if Genever -- that there are tLo Genever entities on top of the apartment. If oni of those, or both of those, are transferred, then tLiS I order doesn't apply to that. The Sherry-Netherland I wouldn't know about that. In fact, the apartment the Genever entities, their assets, which include thi I\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n| 1 | apartment,
have
been
pledged
during
this
case,
and |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 2 | nobody
knew
about
it.
So
if
.the
order
were
broarened
to |\n| 3 | include
transfers
of
the
Genever
entities,
PledgjS, |\n| 4 | assignments,
sales,
and
done.
so
before
the
transfer, |\n| 5 | that
would
take
care
of
one
of
the
problems. |\n| 6 | The
other
problem
is
the
Zhang
Wei
testimony. |\n| 7 | The
testimony
is
that
Mr.
Kwok
has
said
he
doesn't
own |\n| 8 | the
apartment,
somebody
else
does,
Zhang
Zhjng
Wei,
Wei |\n| 9 | is
the
one
who
pledged
it,
and
Zhang
Wei
can
apparently |\n| 10 | do
whatever
he
wants
with
the
apartment.
So
the
concern |\n| 11 | is
that |\n| 12 | THE
COURT:
No,
no,
no.
The
legal
owner
of |\n| 13 | I
I
the
apartment
is
the
Genever
LLC,
which,
as
understand |\n| 14 | I
it,
is
a
sole
member
LLC
owned
by
Mr.
Kwok;
correct? |\n| 15 | MR.
MOSS:
Well,
it's
a
little
-- |\n| 16 | THE
COURT:
And
then
the
Genever
entity
is,
in |\n| 17 | turn,
owned
by
another
Genever
LLC. |\n| 18 | MR.
MOSS:
And
Mr.
Kwok
owns
that
one. |\n| 19 | THE
COURT:
And
Mr.
Kwok
is
the
sole
member
of |\n| 20 | that
one. |\n| 21 | MR.
MOSS:
Correct,
your
Honor. |\n| 22 | THE
COURT:
So
the
only
entity
that
can |\n| 23 | transfer
ownership
of
the
apartment
is
the
Genevlr |\n| 24 | entity
that
holds
title;
correct? |\n| 25 | MR.
MOSS:
That
should
be
the
case. |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 107 of 126\n\n| Proceedings |\n|-------------|\n|-------------|\n\n1 Honor. 2 3 title to THE COURT: , And the Genever entity that owns the apartment can only transfer it witd the 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 approval of the board of directors of the Sherry-Netherland; correct. MR~ MOSS: Well, the Genever entity, the New York'entity that owns the apartment, is controlled by the British Virgin Islands entity. THE' COURT: I get all of that. But tHe title to the apartment is in the Genever entity. MR. MOSS: Yes. THE COURT: That is in New York, and is listed on the records of the Sherry-Netherland as the owner of the apartment. MR. MOSS: Correct, your Honor. THE COURT: And that entity can't sell the apartment without giving notice; correct? MR. MOSS: Well, the current order is ihat - the defendant which, at the time that this was entered, we hadn't amended, so it was Mr. Kwok must provife -- THE COURT: Okay. So at a minimum, I have to amend the prior order precluding Mr. Kwok, Genevlr New York, and Genever B.V.I. from transferring, assi6ning or pledging the apartment without giving you notice, and the Court will so order that, and we'll prepare an order I\n\n---\\_.\\_--------\n\n# **Proceedings**\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\nof 126\n\n107\n\nto that effect.\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n20\n\nNow, assuming that order is entered before the sun goes down today, why do you need an attachment, assuming all of the following: Mr. Kwok denies rhe existence of the debt owed to the plaintiff -- and this is assuming, without deciding any of these thingls.\n\nMR. MOSS: Of course, your Honor.\n\n8 9 THE the residence COURT: Assuming that Mr. Kwok purchased under false pretenses; assuming thlt some 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 mysterious Chinese political prisoner, Zhang Wei, W-E-I, controls Genever; assuming, without deciding, that Mr. Kwok lied about a potential pledge of the relidence to another entity after this litigation was initlated; assuming, without deciding, that Mr. Kwok lied ar his deposition, that he never attempted to assign the residence to his son; and assuming, without deCibing, that Mr. Kwok was improperly directed by counsel not to answer questions regarding.his intent to sell the residence.\n\nHow are you prejudiced?\n\n21 22 23 24 25 MR. MOSS: Other than -- I don't t~ink we are, your Honor. Obviously, we would prefer the attachment. It's a property interest. We think that we have met, and can meet, the burden, but if that's how your Honor wishes to proceed, you know, I don't have --\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 109 of 126\n\n### **Proceedings**\n\n1 2 3 4 THE COURT: I haven't decided facts, but I am going to issue an order I just indicated, and does that obviate to proceed to any of those along tJe lines the need for us 5 6 MR. SARNOFF: May I question? Would we therefore also just ask one related assume that the motion is 7 8 sort of suspended, and we can renew it at such time as any of those -- 9 10 THE COURT: Well, prejudice to you seeking an of course this is wiihout attachment if and when you 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 get notice of any intent by any of the three persons or entities that I've just identified to sell, pledge, assign or otherwise transfer the residence. MR. SARNOFF: I think under those conditions, your Honor, we would be amenable to such an orde~ and to the suspension or withdrawal, at this point, of bur attachment m9tion. THE COURT: Okay. Now, do defendants have a problem with any of this? 20 21 MR. HARMON: solved the problem, I If I thought that that would have will have suggested it a lbng time 22 23 24 25 ago, so the answer is no, I have no problem with it. I do want to be clear, however, that the without prejudice to renew the attachment is not just whenever the~ feel like it, or whenever they think they have more e~idence,\n\nof 126\n\n1\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\n5\n\n6\n\n7\n\n8\n\n9\n\n10\n\nTHE COURT: I don't going to reveal in this case, complaint know what discover¥ is based on the amendLd\n\nMR. HARMON: But your Honor --\n\nTHE COURT: -- and I don't believe thai the plaintiffs poc~ets are deep enough to come running back here seeking an attachment unless they have some greater basis for doing so than they presently have.\n\n11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. HARMON: I think you would be surprised, and I said this at the last oral argument, I didh,t know why they made the second application, given the lelief that your Honor had fashioned for them in the filst I application, which was relief they hadn't even asked for. So I didn't understand the need for the se~ond application, and if somebody had said to us, Weli, let's include the entities, we would have said fine. kt's an I injunction. We'll abide by the injunction. So that's why I'm saying, I just want to be clear that we lre I going to move from here to merits discovery, so we can get on with trying to deal with the issues that lre the heart of the case and not just whether or not thiy will I be able to 'collect against the Sherry apartment if and when they ever get a judgment.\n\nLisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n,\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 111 of 126\n\n> 1 110 THE COURT: But they don't have a judgment. 2 3 4 5 MR. HARMON: Exactly. THE COURT: All right. To simpler, and to avoid an application the order that' I'm going to enter is make this eren for any attachment, going to aliso 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 require the defendants to give notice if Genever New York or Genever B.V.I. wishes to sell or transfe~ any of its assets. So B.V.I. can't sell --'I'm sorry benever , I B.V.I. can't sell Genever New York to another LLC without giving notice. MR. HARMON: That's fine. MR. SARNOFF: And cannot pledge it, either. And also cannot pledge it. THE COURT: Yes. Right? So are we done? MR. MOSS: I think we are. MR. SARNOFF: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. MR. MOSS: Thank you. THE COURT: Okay. Have a nice afternoon and a nice weekend. MR. MOSS: You too. Thank you. 21 \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* \\* 22 23 24 25 Certified to be a true and accurate e above-entitled m tter.\n\nSenior Court Reporter Lisa A. Casey - Official Court Reporter\n\n| Case 22-50073 | Doc 440-15
Asia v. | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Filed 05/25/22 | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 112
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| Pacific Alliance
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Kwok HoWan | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | I |\n| | address
(10) | 58:18;67:14 | 18,22;39:2,11,14,19; | April (2) |\n| | 17:4,6;20:3,6,7,8, | agreed
(3) | 40: 18;41 :21 ;43:5,7; | |\n| \\$ | | | | I 49:7;51:
14 |\n| | 12;56: 10;70: 10;98: I | 12: 14;21 :6; I04: 15 | 44:4,6,7;46:3;55:4, | architect
(I) |\n| \\$3.3 (2) | addresses
(I) | agreement
(12) | 18;56: 12;57: 17; | I 84:6 |\n| 61:21;63:24 | 16:8 | 7:11;11:11;45:16; | 58: 12;59:7;61
:7,10; | argue
(I) |\n| \\$60 (3) | adequate
(3) | 61 :23;67: 17,25;68:2, | 64:6,11,15;65:15; | 71-13 I
I |\n| | 62: 18,20; 102:9 | 7,18;70: 19;86: 19; | 66: 1;67:3, 15;68:8,14, | -
argued
(2) |\n| 21 :2;22:4,23 | | | | |\n| | adjourned
(I) | 93:20 | 21,21 ;69:2;70:6,12, | I
16:21;45:12 |\n| A | 99:23 | agreements
(I) | 13,17,18;74:
15,19; | argument
(6) |\n| | administrative
(I) | 67:16 | 75:25;76:
13;79:21; | I 24:21;44:2,16; |\n| abandon
(2) | 67:4
- | ahead
(7) | 81:7,7,13,14,17,17, | :
45:21;102:6;109:12 |\n| 49:21;51:3 | administrator
(5) | 29: 15;34:7;62:
12; | 20,23;82:4;83:2; | arguments
(2) |\n| | 27:3,4;39:7;42:6; | 63: 14;66: 17;87:21; | 85:5,12,23;86:2,3,13, | |\n| abide (I) | | | | I 32:14,16 |\n| 109:19 | 47:1 | 94:6 | 14,23;87:6,7,12,25; | around
(4) |\n| ability
(I) | admissible
(I) | akin (I) | 90: 11 ;95:7,13;98:
14; | 20:23;48:25;55:
19; |\n| 96:10 | 26:20 | 56:25 | 104: 16,21,24;
105: I, | 70:25 |\n| | admitted
(3) | Alliance
(I) | 8,10,13,23;
106:3,7, | I
arranged
(I) |\n| able (5) | 12:22;24:
10;41: 17 | | | |\n| 31: 19;49:8;72:23; | | 2:2 | 10,14,17,24;
109:24 | I 101:21 |\n| 93:19;109:24 | admonitions
(I) | allow (3) | apartment's
(2) | arrested
(I) |\n| absent
(I) | 13:19 | 8:20;66: 17;75: 13 | 30: 14;98:25 | I 48:17 |\n| 87:14 | adult
(I) | almost
(3) | apologize
(3) | arrival
(I) |\n| | 50:24 | 20:11;47:3;52:23 | 41:9;96:13,17 | I
103: 18 |\n| absolutely
(4) | advance
(3) | along (3) | | |\n| 5:20;73:7,11;76:10 | | | apparently
(I) | Asia (I) |\n| abuse
(2) | 73:20;96:
16;98: 18 | 34:6;56:
17; 108:2 | 105:9 | I 2:2 |\n| 4:16;14:21 | adverse
(I) | amassing
(I) | appear
(2) | aside (I) |\n| accede (I) | 54:6 | 79:10 | 14:8;50: 13 | I 102:7 |\n| | adversely
(I) | amazing
(I) | appearance
(I) | asserted
(2) |\n| 64:2 | 9:8 | | | |\n| accept (2) | | 58:15 | 97:13 | I 92:9;94:
II |\n| 14:6;79:21 | advise
(I) | amenable
(I) | appearances
(2) | asset (2) |\n| acceptable
(3) | 76:7 | 108:15 | 2:4,11 | I 7:2;24: 17 |\n| 99: 16,18,20 | advising
(I) | amend
(I) | application
(13) | assets (16) |\n| | 72:4 | 106:22 | 7:22;57:
12;59: 13; | I 6:8,9,20;
II :25; |\n| access (I) | affidavit
(41) | amended
(8) | | |\n| 20:9 | | | 60:2,24;62:22;65:
13, | , 37:3;60:10,14,17,18; |\n| accommodate
(I) | 5: 17;23:2,12,18; | 100: 10,13,15,20; | 23;83:23;84:4; | 61:13;62:19;74:3,3; |\n| 96:22 | 25:8,9,12,14;26:20, | 102: 1,2; 106:20; | 109:13,15,17 | 80: 17,19; 104:25
I |\n| accomplish
(2) | 23,25;27:
1,17;28:24; | 109:4 | applications
(2) | assign (3) |\n| | 31: 10;35:7,23,25; | America
(2) | 58:12;63:10 | |\n| 67:11;74:19 | | | | I 6:25;107:15; |\n| accomplished
(2) | 36:2,3,6,8;40:11,16; | 49:4;51:
14 | applied
(2) | 108: 13
I |\n| 32: 19;86:4 | 41: 15, 15,23;42: 1,2; | American
(2) | 59:6;90:10 | ~ssigned
(I) |\n| accurate
(3) | 44: 12, 16;46: 10, 12, | 14: 15;47:5 | apply
(2) | I 98:11 |\n| 101:3,9,13 | 21 ;53:7,9,15,25; | Americans
(I) | 104: 18,23 | assigning
(I) |\n| | 54: 10,20;73: I | 15:12 | approach
(I) | |\n| across (I) | | | | I 106:23 |\n| 6:19 | affidavits
(I) | among
(2) | 17: 12 | ~ssignment
(I) |\n| acting (2) | 42:4 | 52:4;84: 12 | approached
(I) | I 104: 13 |\n| 3:25;64: 10 | affirm
(I) | amount
(4) | 64:15 | assignments
(I) |\n| action (4) | 97:22 | 3:20;61: 19;62: 17; | appropriate
(2) | I 105:4 |\n| | afternoon
(3) | 79:9 | 45:12;103:1 | assistance
(I) |\n| 3:19;68:11;100:2,4 | 75:3,4;103:20 | and/or (I) | | |\n| actions
(I) | | | approval
(II) | I 97:20 |\n| 68:10 | afterwards
(2) | 46:1 | 6:7;7:23;58:14; | ~ssistant
(2) |\n| acts (I) | 27:23;59:20 | answered
(3) | 65: 17;84: 13;85:24; | I 5: 14;77:25 |\n| 98:14 | Again (IS) | 10:8;66:6,10 | 86:4;87:
15;95:9; | associates
(I) |\n| actual
(2) | 4:21 ;26:8;37:6; | anymore
(I) | 98: 19; I06:4 | I 11:24 |\n| | 41 :9,25;43:4;45:20; | 43:8 | approve
(6) | |\n| 44:9;97:
1 | | | | assume
(I) |\n| actually
(9) | 47: I ;51: 1,1, I ;67: 13; | apartment
(129) | 7:21;80:13,15; | I 108:6 |\n| 3:8;8: 12;23:25; | 87:2;94:2,8 | 4:2;5:23;6:2,12,25; | 88:9;90:
13; 104: 17 | assuming
(9) |\n| 41: I0,23;43:8;54:17; | against
(2) | 7:9,13;8:21;
10:20; | approved
(5) | 102:6;
I07:2,4,6,8, |\n| | 104:16;109:24 | 14:2,3,11,12;15:3; | | |\n| 62:5,14 | | | 61:3;80:10,22; | 9,11,14,16
1 |\n| add (2) | ago (7) | 18:25;19:4,17;20:20, | 81 :25;83:24 | asylum
(I) |\n| 100:10,14 | 7: 19;42:3;55:20; | 24;23:8;27:11,18,22; | approving
(I) | 114:17 |\n| | | 28:7,15,17,18,19,23; | 58:12 | ~ttach
(2) |\n| | 61: 12;70: 16;75: 10; | | | |\n| addition
(I) | | | | |\n| 4:12 | 108:22 | 29:4,6,9,17;30:7,17; | approximately
(4) | I 23:8;24:21 |\n| additional
(2) | agree (5) | 32:21 ;33:2,9,10,
12, | 61 :21 ;63:21 ;64: 1; | attached
(3) |\n| 80:2,4 | 9:21; 14:5;49:21; | 13,21 ;34: 19;37: 16, | 78:23 | I 6:23;40:
15;41: 15 |\n\nMin-U-Scl'ipt@\n\n(I) \\$3.3 - attached\n\n| | | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 113
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | attachment
(34) | 54:11,18,22;90:14; | board's
(I) | buys (I) | I 8:24;75: II |\n| | 2:25;3: 17,22,23; | 109:4 | 65:19 | 87:25 | certificate
(4) |\n| | 4:24;5: 15,18;8: 18; | basic (I) | book (6) | BVI (8) | I 88:1,5,7,12 |\n| | 9:2;10:14;11:21; | 10:II | 12:19;41:13,14; | 34: 16, 17,23;45:9, | chairman
(2) |\n| | 13:21;24:6;25: 15; | basically
(2) | 69: 12;77:3,5 | 12;86: 13, 17;106:23 | I 58:10;90:8 |\n| | 44: 18;46: 15;78:3,5; | 31:18;59: 17 | both (6) | | chairperson
(I) |\n| | 98:8; 102:5,8, 11,14, | basis (2) | 10:22;22: 13;60: 17; | C | I 57:24 |\n| | 17;I03: 1,13;104:4,7; | 101:2;109:10 | 92: 13;100:20; I04:22 | | challenge
(2) |\n| | 107:3,22; 108: 10,17, | began
(I) | bottom
(I)
, | call (4) | I 13:13;14:21 |\n| | 24;109:9 | 63:3 | 20:17 | 16:22;66: 19;84: I; | change
(3) |\n| | attempt
(I) | beginning
(I) | bought
(I) | 97:9 | I 51: 10;66:20;67:7 |\n| | 98:18
attempted
(I) | 51:22 | 14:II | came (11) | changing
(I) |\n| | 107:15 | begun (I) | boyfriend
(2) | 33:2;48:7,8;49:8, | I 62:21 |\n| | attempts
(I) | 102:3
behalf
(7) | 50:1,4
breached
(I) | 25;51: 14,21 ;52:22; | charge
(2) |\n| | 4:2 | 19:3,16;23:4,5; | 7:10 | 82:2,15;88:11
camera
(I) | I 40:22,25
charges
(2) |\n| | attend
(I) | 64: 10;79: 12;82:3 | break
(2) | 50:22 | |\n| | 27:25 | behavior
(2) | 99:1,8 | can (57) | I 61:18;81:4
chase (I) |\n| | attention
(8) | 9:12;74:13 | Brenda
(4) | 9:16,20;12:25; | I 6:19 |\n| | 20: 16;26:6;28:24; | behind
(I) | 82:21,22,25;83:
I | 14:10;15:11,13,13; | Chief(3) |\n| | 40: 14,21;69:8, 17; | 56:17 | brief (5) | 24: 13, 15;25:4,7, I0; | I 56:23;76:5;78:9 |\n| | 87:9 | Beijing
(4) | 5:8;69: 14,18;70:5; | 26:6,9,16,18;27:2,15, | China
(11) |\n| | attorney
(7) | 33: 10,12;48:7,8 | 72:25 | 16;28: 17,20;31 :5; | 14:17, 19,24; 15:9; |\n| | 27: I;28:9;33: 19; | beneficial
(I) | briefed
(I) | 34:4,5;40: 10;42:23; | 48:25;49:2,2,9,10; |\n| | 42:9;46: I;58:8;64:25 | 86:15 | 3: I | 43: 17;46:7, 18;47:25; | 50:13,15 |\n| | audio (3) | best (I) | briefing
(I) | 52:23;59:3;61 :2; | Chinese
(17) |\n| | 11:22,22; 12:5 | 9:12 | 4:10 | 64: 15;66: 12;69:8; | 14:18,20;20:9; |\n| | authentic
(2) | betray
(2) | brieny
(5) | 72: 17,19;73:25;74:2; | 30:25;35: I0;42: 15; |\n| | 12:4,21 | 49:20,20 | 5:11;7:17;11:4; | 77:23;83: 17;87: 12, | 47:2;48: 18;49: 16; |\n| | authenticate
(I) | better
(7) | 16:15;74:1 | 16,18;89:5;91 :24; | 50:6,14,20,25;59:23; |\n| | 69:20 | 48:2;75: 11,12,16; | briefs (2) | 92: 10;98: 15;99:5; | 75:20;97: 14; 107: 10 |\n| | authenticity
(3) | 104:3,5,6 | II :5,6 | 101:22; 105:9,22; | choice (I) |\n| | 12:6; 13:13;43:20 | big (I) | bring (3) | 106:3; 107:24; 108:7; | I 47:2 |\n| | available
(I) | 7:10 | 15:21;58:17,18 | 109:21 | Citizen
(I) |\n| | 8:3 | bigger
(I) | British
(I) | cancel
(I) | I 14:15 |\n| | Avenue (I) | 50:24 | 106:8 | 63:5 | City (2) |\n| | 98:3 | biggest (I) | broadened
(I) | capacity
(2) | I 51:12;59:1 |\n| | avoid (4) | 6:16 | 105:2 | 78:8;81:16 | claim (4) |\n| | 5:15;11:15;44:13; | bills (2) | broker
(3) | caption
(I) | 1100:16;101:12; |\n| | 46:15 | 52:17,21 | 19:1;58: 16;64: 14 | 11:23 | 102:4;104:15 |\n| | aware
(I) | binders
(I) | Bronx (I) | care (2) | clarification
(3) |\n| | 75:22 | 43:21 | 103:21 | 13:18;105:5 | I 19:13;32: 10;89: 17 |\n| | away (2) | binding
(I) | brother
(5) | case (22) | clear (18) |\n| | 42:24;86:20 | 87:11 | 48~14,17;50: 10, 12, | 4:1;9:2;10:8; | 5:4;9:18;12:15; |\n| | ax (I) | bit (6) | 19 | 12:II; 16:II ;23:2,20; | 17:3;22:3;24:4; |\n| | 73:5 | 47:7;51: 10;52:25; | brothers
(2) | 28:9;31: 19;33: 15,17; | 33:22;41 :25;45:5,17; |\n| | 8 | 56: 16;91: 15;92:3 | 18:7;48:20 | 47: 18;70:4;79:7; | 55':3;56: 10;85:6; |\n| | | bite (I) | build (I) | 89:11;98:14;102:16; | 94:8; 101:25; I03:9; |\n| | | 15:15 | 52:12 | 103:6;105:1,25; | 108:23;109:20 |\n| | back (15) | Blair (I) | building
(4) | 109:4,23 | clearly
(2) |\n| | 15:14;19:11;48:2, | 84:17 | 6: 12;58:20;67: 16; | caselaw
(I) | I 38:7;91:18 |\n| | 7,8;49:9;50: 15,16; | blank
(2) | 85:21 | 9:18 | CLERK
(IS) |\n| | 51:21;52:23;63:4;
87:2;89: 13;99: 15; | 30:23,23
board
(36) | burden
(2) | cases (4) | 2:1,11;17:2,3,7; |\n| | 109:8 | 7: 18,23;57: 16,21; | 98:7;107:24
business
(3) | 4:4,20;5:2;24:
18 | 56:8,9,13;97: 12, 18, |\n| | background
(4) | 58:11,19,22;59:15, | 15:9;18:11;57:9 | casual
(I) | 19,22,25;99: 19; |\n| | 39:9;47:4,16;58:6 | 22,24;62:4,8,13,17; | businesses
(I) | 25:25 | 103:19 |\n| | bad (I) | 79: 13,16, 18,20,24; | 18:4 | Cause
(I) | Cleveland
(5) |\n| | 53: 19 | 80:6,8, I0, 12;83 :22, | buy (5) | 3:19
CEO (I) | 17:18;58:9;93:7,9, |\n| | barrier
(2) | 23,25;84:2;85:25; | 6:11;10:20;61:7, | 7:17 | 11
client(4) |\n| | 14:25;31:2 | 86: 18,22;87: 15; | 10;85:5 | certain
(2) | |\n| | based (8) | 90: 10, 13;93: 10; | buying
(I) | II :25;89: 19 | I 5:3;8:23;58: 17, 18
client's
(I) |\n| | 6: 17;15:8; 16:4; | 95:10;106:4 | 81:22 | certainly
(2) | |\n| | | | | | I 99:12 |\n\nMin-U-Script@ I\n\n(2) attachment - client's\n\n- ----\n\n| FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM
Case 22-50073
Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v.
of 126
Kwok HoWan
Clinic (I)
concerning
(I)
4: 16;50:6;60:3
14,15;28: 12, 13;29:2,
58:9
32:21
controlled
(I)
6,11,13,15,20;30:21;
clip (5)
concession
(I)
106:7
32:11,14;34:7;35:7,
10:5;11:22;13:10;
21:6
controls
(4)
16;37:8;38: 19,25;
91:11;92:15
conclusions
(I)
8: 15;10:21;87:5;
40: 13;41: 12,19,21;
clips (3)
102: 16
107:11
43: 11,23;44:20,25;
9:3;10:4;13:5
condense
(I)
convenience
(3)
45:24;46:9,11,13,17;
close (5)
99:5
21:16,19,22
50: 13;51 :4,6;53:4,
I
45: 10;63:3,5,8,15
condition
(I)
conversation
(3)
10;54:6,24;55: 15,22,
closed (I)
58:19
26: 1;38:24;39: I
25;56:3;58:
15,25;
63:18
conditions
(2)
conversations
(I)
59:3;60:8,22;61
:2;
closing (2)
61:14;108:14
38:23
62:9;63: 13;66:8, 17;
62:22;63:22
conduct
(I)
COO (2)
67: 1,9, 14;68: 13,16,
colleague
(4)
102:3
6:6;57: 11
18,24;69: 10,21 ,25;
42: 15;47:3,8;52:20
conducting
(2)
co-op (I)
70:1,5,9,11,21,24;
collect (13)
102:12;103:10
59:1
71: 1,3,5, 14;72:8, 10,
27:5;28:3;31:13;
conCer (I)
cooperates
(I)
12,17,19,21 ;73:2;
39:8;42:7,13,18;52:2,
16:1
10:1
74:8,11,17,21;75:13,
4,13,14;54: I; 109:24
confidential
(I)
cooperative
(2)
23;76:7,23;77:3,7,9,
collected
(2)
59:21
15:7;80:22
12,12,15,18;78:
14;
42:5;54:9
confirm
(I)
copies (I)
85:2,23;86:2,7,24;
collecting
(2)
5:21
78:24
87:11,14,20;88:24; | Page 114
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
April 26, 2019
98:25;102:9;
106:18
.currently
(I)
I 51: 16
futting
(I)
20: 11
D
~aily (2)
I 52:15,16
date (2)
I 41 :4;49:7
dated
(I)
I 45:10
daughtcr
(I)
I 48:19
day (7)
42:8;50:23;51:
I;
52: 15;58:7;81 :3;
91:19 |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | |\n| | DC (I) |\n| 42:9,14
conCused (2)
copy (8)
89: 10, 13;90: 18,22; | I 45:8 |\n| college (I)
38:3;45:20
17:II ;69:22;72:2;
92:2,8;93 :2,5,8, 12, | deal (I) |\n| 50:2
connection
(I)
76:2;77:9,16;78:5,21
14,16,19;94:3,4,6, II, | I 109:22 |\n| colloquy
(I)
84:13
copying (I)
15,18,21,25;95:6,16, | dealing
(3) |\n| 46:1
consent
(2)
78:1
22;96: 10,15, 19;97:4, | I 9:16;62:15;102:17 |\n| coming (4)
15:2;98:16
corporate
(3)
8,10,12,17,21,23; | Dear (3) |\n| 15:6;73: 12;94: 10;
conservative
(6)
4: 16;10:22; 100:7
98:4,5,19,23;99:7,
II, | I 20:16;21:15,18 |\n| 103:20
31: 18;35:4, 10, 14,
Corporation
(2)
15,18,20,21,22,23; | debt (2) |\n| communicate
(3)
15,17
37:4;78:20
100:2,6,12,17,25; | I 8:22;107:5 |\n| 10:6;27:25;73:20
consider
(3)
correctly
(I)
101:6, 10, 12,15, 17; | decide (I) |\n| Communist
(II)
9:20;94:3; 102:21
21:7
102:9,19,21,23; | |\n| 14:20,22;20:9;
considering
(I)
corruption
(I) | I 103:1 |\n| 103: 17,23; 104:3,8,
42: 15;47:3;48: 18;
92:2
14:23
19;105: 12,16, 19,22; | decided
(I) |\n| 49: 16;50:6, 14,20,25
consistent
(2)
Counsel
(7) | I 108:1 |\n| 106:2,9,12,16,21,25;
companies
(3) | deciding
(4) |\n| 38:20;65: 19
2:4,12;32:6;71 :7;
107:8; I08: 1,9, 18; | I 107:6,11,14,16 |\n| 7:24;18:15,19
constitutes
(I)
72: 16,24; 107: 17
109:3,7 | decisions
(I) |\n| company
(4)
29:25
counsel's
(I)
courtroom
(I) | I 96:8 |\n| 8:22;34: 18,18;47:4
constraints(l)
11:6
9:12 | deep (I) |\n| complaint
(7)
62:24
counter
(3)
courts
(I) | I 109:8 |\n| 100: 10,13, 15,20;
contact
(9)
6:4;21:7;91:12
46:14 | deCaulted (I) |\n| 102:2,3;109:5
19:5;66:4,20,21 ;
counterclaims
(I)
cover (I) | I 6:18 |\n| Complete
(I)
67: 1,4;82: 18,20,21
3:21
62:18 | deCeat (I) |\n| 4:15
contacted
(I)
countered
(3)
coverage
(I) | I 8:17 |\n| com pleted (2)
50:10
21:10,12;91:6
62:20 | deCendant
(6) |\n| 44:15;75:14
contend
(I)
counters
(I)
covcring
(I) | I 2:20;3:20;10:3; |\n| com pletely (2)
101:17
91:13
61: 17 | 98:9; 100:25; I06: 19 |\n| 11:12;38:20
context
(3)
country
(3)
CPLR
(4) | deCendants
(2) |\n| com pleteness
(2)
13:9;15:19;95:11
9:25; 15:6;49:20
5:24;9:6;24:24; | I 12:16;108:18 |\n| 13:7;96:9
continue
(2)
couple (3)
45:22 | deCendant's
(7) |\n| completion
(I)
50:6;51: 14
16:15;67:6;95:21
credibility
(2) | I 76:20,21,24;77:
13, |\n| 103:7
continuing
(3)
course
(9)
26:20;46: 15 | 23;78:13;101:1 |\n| complicated
(2)
44:8,24;45:20
10:24; 12:24;26:2,
creditors
(2) | define (2) |\n| 26: 15;87:21
contract
(7)
2;95:4;99: 14;102:22;
3:25;98:9 | I 52:1,1 |\n| comply (I)
15:2;63:6;75:24;
107:7;108:9
cross (18) | deCraud (2) |\n| 76:9
76:7;85: 11;86:22;
COURT
(211)
13:6; 16: 12;47:22; | I 3:25;98:9 |\n| concept
(2)
104:13
2:6,23;3:4,10,13;
75: I;77:5;89: 18,20, | deCrauded
(2) |\n| 15:6,10
contradicted
(I)
8: 17;9: 16,19,20,21;
20,23 ;90:4;91 :4; | I 8: 10,13 |\n| concern
(I)
8:6
11:10;16:1,17,21;
95: 16;96:2,3,5,6,8, 15 | delivered
(I) |\n| 105: 10
contrary
(I)
17:9; 19:23;22:4;
cultural
(I) | |\n| concerned
(2)
26:13
23: 16;24:8, 15;25:3, | I 76:16 |\n| 15: 18
6: 17;88:20
control
(3)
23;26: 10, 15;27: 10,
current
(3) | demanded
(I) |\n| | I 3:20 |\n\n--\n\n**'1in-U-Script:!lI** (3) Clinic - demanded\n\n| FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 115
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | I |\n| demonstrate
(2) | 15:9 | 50:8,13,18,22 | 59:10 | encumbrance
(5) |\n| 5:15;9:1 | diced (I) | document
(37) | ears (I) | I 5:24;24: 19;44:9; |\n| demonstratives
(I) | 13:3 | 17:15;19:20;23:13; | 13: 11 | 45:22,23 |\n| 90:19 | dictionary
(I) | 25: 17;26:I,4,7,13,21; | East (I) | ~nd (2) |\n| denied (3) | 53:22 | 29: 10;40: 15;41: 10, | 17:6 | I 49:22;65:22 |\n| 8:3;24:21 ;38:22 | difference
(6) | 16,20;43:4,14,21 ; | edit (I) | enforcement
(I) |\n| denies (3) | 35:8;36:9,11,14; | 44:20;45:3,10;46:4, | 99:2 | I 98:10 |\n| 7:1,3;107:4 | 53:2,4 | 20,21,23;54:23; | educate
(I) | England
(I) |\n| denying
(I) | different
(10) | 59:24;68:3;69:15,19, | 10:25 | I 65:1 |\n| 6:3 | 18:8,10,11;27:9; | 20,24;71: 12,16, 17, | Edward
(I) | English (20) |\n| depose (3) | 29:8,8,9;66: 11;67:6; | 23;77: 14,20 | 2:14 | 15:1,4,5, 14; 19:7, |\n| 41:25;42:3,10 | 96:6 | documentary
(I) | effect (I) | 10,11 ;30:24;31: 1; |\n| deposed
(8) | difficult
(I) | 7:5 | 107:1 | 47:7;53: 18,19;68:3; |\n| 7: 18;29:23;30:3, | 75:18 | documentation
(3) | effectively
(I) | |\n| 19,22;31 :3, 10,24 | difficulty
(2) | | | 75:7;82:25;83: I,9, 11, |\n| deposing
(2) | | 57: 14;59:22;65: 14 | 56:25 | 14,15 |\n| | 31:6;42:22 | documents
(42) | efficient
(I) | enough
(6) |\n| 36:12,12 | digest (I) | 15:25;27:4,5,9; | 90:16 | I 5:3;16:22;51:4; |\n| deposit
(II) | 47: 11 | 28: 10, 10;31:4,5,13, | effort
(2) | 72:20;90:21; 109:8 |\n| 6:16;61:17,20; | direct(lI) | 21;39:8;42:7,8, 12,14, | 5:15;8:17 | enter
(2) |\n| 62:3;63: 19,24;64:7; | 9:22; 17:17;20: 16; | 19,20,22,24;45:7,8, | efforts
(5) | I
85: 11;86:22 |\n| 67: 18;80:24;81: 1,3 | 26:6;28:23;40: 14,21; | 18;47: 13, 15;49: 17; | 5:25;14:3,20; | entered
(6) |\n| deposition
(42) | 54: 15;56: 14;69:8,17 | 52:5,14;53: 10,13, 14, | 18:24;19:17 | I 75:23;76:6,16; |\n| 8:2,10;9:5,7,13; | directed
(2) | 17,20,23,25;54: 1,2; | either
(12) | 79:4; 106: 19;I07:2 |\n| 11:7,16;12:4;17:12; | 102:5;107:17 | 60:6;67: 19;78:24; | 6: 14;8: 10;22: 10, | entire
(2) |\n| 28:4;29:19,22;31 :25; | directly
(3) | 79:10,11;84:12 | 20;28: 15;42: 15,16, | I 92: 17;94: I |\n| 32:7,8,22;33: 16,18; | 8:6;46:15,16 | dollars
(I) | 17;47:9;51 :23;84:7; | entities
(16) |\n| 34:20;35: 14;38: 12, | Directors
(3) | 60:1 | 90:1 | 8:4,15; 10:19,20,21, |\n| 23;39:25;42:23 ;43:2; | 57:22;87: 15;106:4 | dominates
(I) | elder
(2) | 23;36:21,25;37:2; |\n| 66:13,15;73: 18;89:4; | disagreement
(2) | 8:15 | 48:14;50:10 | 100:11,14;104:21,25; |\n| 92:4,9;93: 17,21; | 12:24;44:19 | domination
(I) | element
(I) | 105:3; 108:12; 109: 18 |\n| 94: 12,13;95: 17,20; | disappeared
(3) | 4:16 | 98:8 | entitled
(4) |\n| 96:11,21,23;101:13; | 47:9;51 :24;52:20 | done (4) | elements
(2) | 19:6,15;96:21; |\n| 107:15 | disclosure
(I) | 14:12;15:20;65: 12; | 3: 18;4: 15 | 101:20 |\n| depositions
(I) | 75:23 | 105:4 | elicited
(I) | entitlement
(I) |\n| 13:4 | discovery
(9) | double
(2) | 32:18 | |\n| depth
(I) | 15:21,23;16:2; | 61 :6;85:6 | eliciting
(I) | I 102:14 |\n| | | | | entity
(18) |\n| 103:12 | 44: 18; 102:3, 12; | doubt
(I) | 28:21 | 27: 12;29:8,8,9; |\n| derived
(2) | 103:8;109:3,21 | 22:7 | else (6) | 52:5;81 :20,23; |\n| 62:3,4 | discrepancy
(3) | down (6) | 52: 18;54: 13;55:21; | 101:18; 105: 16,22,24; |\n| describe
(I) | 45:7,9,17 | 38:8;39:6;55:22; | 84:21 ;88: 13;105:8 | 106:2,6,7,8,10,16; |\n| 58:14 | discretionary
(I) | 63:19,25;107:3 | else's (I) | 107:13 |\n| designated
(18) | 104:4 | drafted
(I) | 13:16 | error
(I) |\n| 13:6;89:18,18; | discuss
(7) | 27:1 | email (15) | I
85:3 |\n| 90:5;91 :7, 13,15;92:5, | 22: 14;37:23;38: I, | draw
(2) | 10:6; 19:25;20:3,6, | especially
(2) |\n| 6,13,14,16,19,24; | 2,4;44:8,24 | 63:19,25 | 7,8,12,17,25;21:
1,8; | I 27:23;75: 10 |\n| 93: I,23;96:9;97:2 | discussed
(I) | drop (I) | 22: 12;77:25;78:3; | establish
(2) |\n| designations
(14) | 62:17 | 47:10 | 103:21 | I 3:24;100:18 |\n| 13:7;89:20,21,24; | discussion
(4) | duly (5) | emailed
(I) | established
(4) |\n| 91 :4,4,8;93:23; | 24:3;33:5;38:
14; | 17:I;56:7;59:2; | 22:11 | 170:11,14;102:14, |\n| 95: 16;96:2,2,3,5,6 | 39:5 | 97: 18,19 | emails
(2) | 25 |\n| detail (2) | discussions
(3) | during
(7) | 19:15;20:14 | establishes
(I) |\n| 58:15;103:12 | 19:3;37:21,24 | 6:7;11:16;12:25; | emphasize
(I) | 1102:19 |\n| detailed
(I) | displayed
(7) | 61 :5;95:4,20; I05:1 | 42:6 | estate
(I) |\n| | | | employed
(I) | 147:6 |\n| | | | | |\n| 59:25 | 3: 12;19:22;23: 15; | duty (I) | | |\n| details (2) | 28: 11;40: 12;43:22; | 10:25 | 56:18 | estimated
(2) |\n| 38:9;39:7 | 69:9 | | employee
(2) | I 61:18;103:18 |\n| detain
(I) | dispossessed
(I) | E | 48:22;51 :23 | Europe
(2) |\n| 49:19 | 98:12 | | employer
(I) | 1 48:7;49:3 |\n| determination
(3) | dispute
(4) | earlier
(2) | 18:22 | evaluate
(I) |\n| 102:24; 103:4,14 | 4: 17;18:3;44:4,21 | 79:2;99:2 | encumbered
(I) | I 26:19 |\n| determining
(I) | disputed
(I) | earliest
(3) | 98:12 | evasive (I) |\n| 103:2
developer
(I) | 12:6
divorce
(4) | 21:16,19,22
early
(I) | encumbering
(I)
24:17 | 19:14
~vasiveness
(2) |\n\n- - --------\n\nMill-U-SCl'ipt@ (4) deJonstrate - evasiveness\n\n| FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Doc 440-15
Asia v. | Filed 05/25/22 | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 116
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | I |\n| 9:18,23
even (16) | 5,10,23;78: 13,18;
92:4,5;93:20;96:
11 | 5: 16;87: 14;88: 19;
102: 13 | 3: 17,18,21 ;4: 17; | freedom
(1) |\n| 11:18;12:2;30:20, | exhibiting
(1) | fashion
(1) | 5: 1,13;10:5; 12:13;
16: 15,23;30:20,25; | 14:23
I |\n| 24;32:7;35:6;36: | 16,
92:10 | 32:18 | 34:4;39:21 ;40: 14,22, | French
(1) |\n| 20;42:21 ;46:25; | exhibits
(9) | fashioned
(1) | 24;48:4;49:25;50:
1; | I 31: 1
Frick (1) |\n| 47: 13;55:7;62: 10; | 12:18,20,25; 15:I; | 109:14' | 53: 16;54: 15,20,21; | I 58:8 |\n| 86:21;104: 16;109: 15 | 24:2;42:4,5;53:
11,12 | favor (1) | 59: 19, 19,24;64: 14; | front
(13) |\n| event (1) | exist (2) | 98: II | 69:2;78: 17;79:24; | 24:8,14,20;25:2; |\n| 75:24 | 44:9;54:23 | FBAKOY
(2) | 90: 14;95: 19;97: 15; | 30:9,21 ;31 :7;46:22; |\n| everybody
(2) | existence
(2) | 40:22,25 | 98:22,25;109:14. | 50:22;51 :2;53:6; |\n| 52:17;99:10 | 46:13;107:5 | featured
(1) | five (4) | 54:12;97:3 |\n| evidence
(36) | expeditious
(I) | 4:10 | 39:6;48: 16;49: 11; | frustrate
(5) |\n| 4:5,8,8,9,21 ;5:7,8, | 32:18 | February
(3) | 62:18 | I 4:1;5:1;11:9; |\n| 9,18;7:5;9:22; 12:22; | expensive
(1) | 18:18;59: 10;63:3 | five-year
(1) | 24:18;98:10 |\n| 13:19,23; 16:8, 16; | 6:2 | feel (1) | 61:18 | full (4) |\n| 19:24;23:22;24: 10; | explain
(4) | 108:24 | fluent
(2) | I 13:9; 17:4;56:9; |\n| 25:2,9;26:22;41:11; | 6: 15; 18:5;30: 16; | feet (1) | 83:15,16 | 93:10 |\n| 53:8;60:7;69: 19,20; | 36: 11 | 90:19 | focus (1) | fully (1) |\n| 72: 10,21;78: 13; | expressio~s
(1) | feng (1) | 4:19 | I 3:1 |\n| 90:23;92:11;93:1,25; | 13:19 | 63:7 | folder
(1) | further
(1) |\n| 103:15;108:25 | extant
(2) | few (3) | 59:21 | I 47:20 |\n| evidentiary
(2)
90:22; 103: 11 | 46:3,6
extended
(1) | 9:3;23:25;87: 18 | follow (2) | |\n| exactly (3) | | Firth (1) | 34:5;84:24 | G
I |\n| 6:12;9:25;14:11 | 14:19
extensive
(2) | 98:3 | followed
(1) | I |\n| EXAMINATION | (8)
14:20;32:15 | fight (1)
11:15 | 66:1
following
(5) | Garo
(1) |\n| 17:17;47:22;55: 16; | extensively
(1) | figure (3) | 4:4;29:23,24; | I 2:17 |\n| 56: 14;75: 1;84:22; | 11:5 | 47: 12;53:22;91: 16 | 103:7;107:4 | gather
(11) |\n| 96: 15;98:20 | extent
(6) | me (1) | follows (3) | 27:5,8;28:3;33:6,
18;34: 17;35: 19;37: 1; |\n| examine
(1) | 25:5;90:5;91 :7,12; | 42:20 | 17:2;56:8;97:20 | 41:6;53:10,16 |\n| 16:12 | 92:8;93:24 | med (3) | force (1) | gathered
(13) |\n| examined
(3) | | 9:24;44: 12;46:21 | 50:7 | 22:9,14,19;30:
17; |\n| 17:2;56:8;97:20 | F | mes (1) | foreign
(6) | 31:20,21 ;36:22;37:7, |\n| exam pies (1) | | 43:1 | 6: II ;31: I;61: 10; | 10,13 ;39:22;53 :2, 13 |\n| 13:9 | fact (4) | fill (1) | 85:7,15;87:8 | gave (5) |\n| exceeds (1) | 6:4;21 :5;102: 16; | 76:21 | forge (1) | I 26: 19;43:25;51 :2; |\n| 3:20 | 104:24 | final (3) | 47:17 | 59:21;79:9 |\n| excerpts
(I) | factor
(1) | 102:24; I03 :6, 14 | forged
(5) | gears (1) |\n| 8:3 | 9:20 | Finally
(3) | 49: 16, 17, 18;50:21, | I 62:21 |\n| exchanged
(1) | facts (5) | 7:6;8: 14;11:20 | 25 | general
(3) |\n| 19:15 | 5: 19;36:6;37:9; | financial
(11) | forget
(1) | I 56:25;57: 11,11 |\n| excised (1) | 100:15;108:2 | 7: 19,22;31 :6;47:5; | 49:7 | generally
(3) |\n| 95:20 | fair (9) | 59:15,17,25;79:11; | form (4) | 58:6,14;82:21
I |\n| Excluding
(1) | 12:7; 16:22;60:21; | 90:11,12,14 | 4: 16;74: 18;81 :7; | Genever
(42) |\n| 61:5 | 72:20;79:9,15;85:7, | financials
(1) | 95:4 | 8:15,24;10:19; |\n| excuse (4) | 8;90:21 | 7:24 | former
(3) | 33: 14,21,24;34: 13, |\n| 11:5;19:16;20:11; | fairy (1) | find (1) | 58:7,9;84:17 | 15,15,22,23;36:21, |\n| 95:2 | 95:10 | 68:22 | forth
(1) | 25;37:4,4;39: 12, 15, |\n| excused (2) | False (3) | findings
(2) | 20:23 | 19;40:2;67: 16;76:6; |\n| 55:23;88:25
excusing
(1) | 7: 15;46: 13;107:9 | 32:16;102:15 | forward
(2) | 88:20,20;95:8,9; |\n| 61:9 | familiar
(1) | fine (8) | 12: 11;20:20 | 100: 10, 14;104: 19,20, |\n| execute (1) | 3:2
family (50) | 83: 11,14;89:15; | fought
(1) | 21,25; 105:3, 13,16, |\n| 67:16 | 14:19,19;15:10; | 95:24;97:6;99: 17,22;
109:18 | 11: 13 | 17,23; 106:2,6, 10,22, |\n| Executive
(3) | 17:20,21,22,25; 18:1, | fingers
(1) | found (2)
60:25;70:22 | 23;107:11 |\n| 6:6;56:23;78:8 | 2,3,5,5,8,8, I0, 10, 10, | 13:11 | four (3) | Gilbert
(2) |\n| exhibit
(36) | 11,12,13,14,15,18,22; | finished
(1) | 3: 16;5: 10;69: 17 | I 77:25;81:11
given (13) |\n| 3: 12;19:22;23: 15; | 23:6;47:8;48:5,6,9, | 48:7 | France
(1) | 9:9;25:6;26: 12, 13; |\n| 24:1,2,9;28:11;40:10, | 10,11,12,14,19,24; | firm (2) | 50:2 | 31: 12;36: 10;76:2; |\n| 12,24;41: 12,13,14; | 49:6,9,13,20,21 ;50:7; | 62:14;69:13 | fraud
(3) | 79: 16;98:21 ;99:4; |\n| 43:21,22;53:7;69:9, | 51: 12,13, 15,20;52:2, | firms (2) | 4:25;5:5;46:
16 | 101:15;109:1,13 |\n| 21;71: 16,21,22;72: I; | 2,8, I 1;53 :24 | 62:15;92:3 | fraudulent
(1) | gives (1) |\n| 76:20,22,23,24 ;77:3, | far (4) | first (37) | 25:1 | I 25:7 |\n| | | | | |\n\nMin-U-Script@ (5) even - gives\n\n| | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance | Doc 440-15
Asia v. | Filed 05/25/22 | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 117
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | |\n| giving (13) | 45:25 | 39:3;49: 14;74:8; | 23;95:2,3;96:25; | I 24:8;25:8;29:22; |\n| 20: 18;29:24;30: 11; | halfway
(I) | 90:8;95:7;98:22,24 | 98:21 ;99: 17;100:5,9, | 30:1 |\n| 32:3;34:2,11,25; | 91:19 | hearing
(13) | 19,24; 10I: 14, 16; | important
(3) |\n| 38: 17;40:8;42: I; | hand
(2) | 13:1,8,20; 15:22; | 102: I; 103:9, 10; | I 9:9,10;30:24 |\n| 80: 13;106: 17,24 | 77:3,16 | 35: 19;45:24,25;55:5; | 104:2,6; 105:21; | Importantly
(I) |\n| globe (I) | handed
(10) | 63:7;90:22;98:7; | 106: I, 15; 107:7,22, | I 8:25 |\n| 6:20 | 17: 15;19:20;23: 13; | 100:18;103:11 | 24; 108: 15;109:6,14 | impose (I) |\n| GMail
(I) | 43: 14;69: 15,24; | heart
(I) | Honor's
(I) | I 61: 13 |\n| 20:4
goes (3) | 71 :23;77: 14,20,22
handle
(3) | 109:23 | 13: 18 | impossible
(I) |\n| 46: 15,16;107:3 | 27:24;35: II ;51 :25 | heels (1) | hope (3) | I 91: 15 |\n| Golden
(13) | handled
(3) | 66:23
held (3) | 13:21;16:6,7
hopeless
(I) | improperly
(I) |\n| 23:5;27:3;42:7; | 15:24,24,25 | 57:2;81:7,14 | 42:18 | I 107:17 |\n| 47:2;51: 16,19,21,23, | hands
(4) | help (11) | Hoplamazian
(3) | inadequate
(I) |\n| 25;52: 1,11,22;53:24 | 31:12,22;35:12; | 27:8;28:9;42: 18; | 2: 17,17;69:22 | I 79:25
inadvertently
(I) |\n| Good (13) | 47:16 | 45: 13;47:8, 18,18; | Horvitz
(18) | I 101: 18 |\n| 2:9,13,21,24; | handy
(I) | 52: 13,13,14;73: 12 | 7: 16, 16,22;8:2,8, | inappropriate
(3) |\n| 12:12;13:5;47: 12,24; | 4:7 | helpful
(I) | 12;58:2;81: 16;84:2, | I
11:13,18;72:5 |\n| 56: 16;75:3,4,8, 10 | happen
(2) | 4:11 | 8,24,25;85:3 ;89:4; | include
(4) |\n| Government | (3)
31:2;50:19 | helps (I) | 90:7,8,12;93 :2 | I 96:4;104:25;105:3; |\n| 14:18,21,22 | happened
(9) | 7:3 | Horvitz's
(2) | 109: 18 |\n| graciously
(I) | 6:9,13;9:13;10:15; | Hey (2) | 58:6;90:24 | included
(2) |\n| 96:22 | II: 1;12:8;27:23; | 7:12;12:5 | hotel (4) | I 7:24;58:24 |\n| grant(l) | 33:15,17 | highly (2) | 6: 10,14;7:21 ;57:8 | including
(9) |\n| 103:13 | happening
(4) | 84:11,12 | hour
(4) | 18:6,7;33: 18; |\n| grateful
(I) | 14:3,4;38:9;42:24 | himself(5) | 2:7;45:25;92:
13; | 48: 19,22,25;49: I; |\n| 36:10 | happens
(I) | 10:24,25;18:7; | 94:2 | 52: 12,13 |\n| great(l) | 85:20 | 51: 15;86:20 | Huang
(I) | inconsistent
(3) |\n| 15:15 | happily
(I) | Ho (4) | 97:15 | 25:6;26: 17;38: 19
t |\n| greater
(I) | 2:7 | 2:2; 17:24;59:4; | H-U-A-N-G
(I) | index (I) |\n| 109:9 | happy
(5) | 98:2 | 97:16 | I 2:1 |\n| grew (I) | 44: 12;46: 19;91:20, | H-O (I) | hundred
(2) | indicated
(5) |\n| 14:16 | 21;99:5 | 98:2 | 18:6,9 | I 32:20;76: 12;96: I, |\n| grind
(I) | hard
(2) | Hodgson
(2) | husband
(13) | 18;108:3 |\n| 73:6 | 9:21;91:3 | 2:19,22 | 49: 13, 19, 19,19,20, | indicating
(I) |\n| grounds
(2) | HARMON
(69) | hold (2) | 22;50:1,4,8,10,11,19, | I 31:11 |\n| 3:23;70:8
grow (I) | 2:21,22;5:25;
12: 12;34:3;43: 16; | 60:10,14 | 23 | individuals
(I) |\n| 14:16 | 60:5,20;62:6;63:
II; | Holdings
(2)
37:4,4 | I | I 49:1 |\n| guarantee
(4) | 66:6,9,15;67:12;68:9, | holds (I) | | induce
(2) |\n| 61:25;67: 19;68: 19; | 15,17;69: 12,18;70:7; | 105:24 | JD (2) | I 7:21;8:19
inequity
(I) |\n| 100:3 | 71:11,15,25;72:9,18; | Hong (4) | 40:22,25 | |\n| guaranteed
(I) | 73:4;74:5,14,16,20; | 14:17;18:15;49:3; | idea (3) | I 5:2
information
(72) |\n| 8:23 | 75:2,5;76: 19,24;77:4, | 84:7 | 33:1;53:1;58:15 | 7:20,23,24;22:
10, |\n| guess (5) | 8,11,13,16,19;78:12; | Honor
(106) | identification
(I) | 10,15,15,16,19,20; |\n| 30: 15;32:2;35: 13; | 83: 17,21;84:21 ;85:4, | 2:9,13,21,24;3:
1,9, | 77:23 | 27 :2,5,6,6, 9;28: 3,3; |\n| 71: 1,1 | 9;87: 1,18,23;88:23; | 14;4:22;5:4;8: 1,12, | identified
(I) | 30: 16, 17, 18;31 :21; |\n| guessing
(I) | 89:2,12,15;92:21
; | 25;9:10,13;11:4,20; | 108:12 | 33:6,7,19;34: 17;35:3, |\n| 70:25 | 94: 17, 19,23;95:2; | 12:10, 12;13:2,5,8,21; | identify
(I) | 9,11,19,19,24;36:1, |\n| Guo (23) | 100:24;101:4,7,11, | 14:12;15:16;16:9, 10, | 3:6 | 14,23;37: I,7, 10, 12, |\n| 17:22,25,25; 18:2,5, | 14,16,22; 102:22; | 14,20,22;17:10,11; | ignore
(I) | 13,14,20;39:8,22; |\n| 5,22;23 :6;48:4,6,9, | 108:20; 109:6,11 | 19:19;23:22;24:4, 12, | 30:2 | 41 :7;42:7,8;43:9; |\n| 10,12,24;49:6;51: 12, | Haroche
(I) | 13;29: 14;30:21 ;34:3; | imagine
(I) | 49: 18;52: 14;54:9; |\n| 13,15,19;52:2,8,11; | 81:11 | 38:22;41 :8;43: 13,16, | 9:21 | 58:24;59: 15,18,20; |\n| 53:24 | hear (14) | 21;44:1,10;46:7,8,18; | IMG (1) | 60: I,2,4, 10;79:3, II, |\n| G-U-O (2) | 3:16;13:20,25; | 47:21 ;48:3;51 :9; | 58:10 | 15,18,25;80:2,4; |\n| 17:22;18:2 | 14:10;16:3;32: 16,17; | 55:3,13,14;60:5,20; | immediate
(2) | 90:11,12,14;98:22, |\n| H | 33:6;43: 10;44:3; | 62:6;63: 11;67: 12; | 48:11;104:12 | 24;101:3,8
I |\n| | 47:25;89: II ;90: 18; | 68:9;69: 18,22;70:7; | impact
(2) | initiated
(2) |\n| | 95:5 | 71:11,25;74:5;76:19; | 73:10;102:20 | I 101:19;107:13 |\n| hacked
(1)
20:8 | heard
(15)
29:7,7;30: 10;33:5; | 77: 1,4,8,16;78: 12; | impeach
(2) | injunction
(2) |\n| half(l) | 35:20;37:7, I0;38:25; | 83: 17;89:2,7;90:7;
92: 12;93:23;94: 17, | 28: 17,20 | I
109:19,19 |\n| | | | impeachment
(4) | i1nquired (3) |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (6) giving - inquired\n\n| | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 118
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 64: 10;66:3;82:3 | 106:8 | knew (13) | 68: 10;71 :6;72: 16,24, | 83:10
I |\n| | inquiry
(I) | issue (25) | 21: 1;22:4,8,25; | 25;74: 13;75:7;82: 18; | lengthy
(I) |\n| | 82:6 | 3: 17,21,22;4: 12,12, | 25:22;27:4;69:2; | 83:5,23;84:4;
101: 13 | I 98:20 |\n| | instructed
(2) | 14;15:17, 18;24:4, 10, | 76:5;80: 12,17, 19; | | less (2) |\n| | 11:10;83:2 | 15,19;26: 14;41: 18; | 81:22;105:2 | L | :
99:3,9 |\n| | instructing
(I) | 51 :25;54: 16;55:4; | knowledge
(39) | | leiter
(8) |\n| | 11:24 | 88:16;91:14,24; | 5:20,20;26:24; | laid (2) | I 64:25;71:9;72:4,7, |\n| | instruction
(I) | 102:2,7,17; 103: 12; | 27:7,21;28:1;29:11; | 44:2; 100:21 | 8,19;78:5,17 |\n| | II: 18 | 108:2 | 31:20,21 ;32:21 ;33:3, | language
(10) | leiters
(2) |\n| | instructions
(I)
11:6 | issued (2) | 8,11;34:14;35:18,22; | 14:25; 15: 17;30:24, | I 84:14,16 |\n| | intend
(I) | 88:1 ;104:4
issues (12) | 36:6,7,22;37:3,6,9,
13,14,15;43:9;47:5,6; | 25,25;31: 1,2;36: 15; | liar (I)
47:17 |\n| | 100:22 | 2:25;3:6;5:22; | 53: 1,2;54:8, 16,18,22; | 53: 17;54: 12
last (13) | !
liberties
(I) |\n| | intended
(I) | 10: 15;15:21,23;16:2; | 55:7,9,10;62:7;64:3 | 11:20;13:10;18:21; | I
95: 11 |\n| | 92:23 | 24: I;52:21 ;54: 12; | known
(2) | 26:6;32: 19;44:2; | lied (3) |\n| | intending
(I) | 100:8;109:22 | 3:20;84:8 | 50:9;82:22;86:8; | I 8:10;107:12,14 |\n| | 99:4 | issuing
(I) | knows (3) | 95:7;97: 15; 102:6; | life (I) |\n| | intends
(I) | 102:21 | 9:25;28: 14;52: 18 | 109: 12 | I 51:21 |\n| | 11:8 | | Kong (4) | later
(2) | lifted (2) |\n| | intent (10) | J | 14:17;18:16;49:3; | 9:11;68:23 | i 44:18;45:19 |\n| | 3:25;4:6,18;5: I; | | 84:7 | law (2) | light (I) |\n| | 14:2;24: 18;25: I; | jail (4) | Kwok (154) | 62:14;70:2 | I
61:1 |\n| | 98:9;107:18;108:11 | 14:21 ;48: 17,18,21 | 2:3;3:25;5: 16,22; | lawsuit
(I) | likely (I) |\n| | intention
(I) | Jillian
(I) | 6:7,13,18,24;7:
1,3,7, | 78:25 | I 12:17 |\n| | 103: 11 | 2:19 | 20,25;8:3,9,14,15,23; | lawsuits
(I) | limited
(3) |\n| | interest
(I) | job (I) | 9: 1,10,13,24; 10:5,10, | 9:24 | ~ 31:15;54:11;80:12 |\n| | 107:23 | 42:16 | .20;11:6,17,23;13:10; | lawyer
(3) | line (2) |\n| | interested
(3) | joined
(I) | 14:6,7,8,11,13,15,15, | 39:8,9;50: 10 | I 34:5;91 :24 |\n| | 9:8;99:12,13 | 102:2 | 16,23,25; 15:4, 16,19; | lawyers
(2) | lines (3) |\n| | interests
(I) | Jones
(I) | 16:11;17:19,24;18:1, | 54:12;69:5 | I 38:13;91:21;108:2 |\n| | 8:4 | 58:7 | 13;19:3,6,6,9,9, 17; | Leading
(6) | listed (2) |\n| | International
(I) | judgment
(9) | 21:9, 12,24;22:4,8,13, | 27: 13;54:3;66:6,9, | I 58:17;106:12 |\n| | 58:10 | 4: 1;5: 1;6:22;9:2; | 20,22,25;23:4;27:
10, | 11;74:7 | listen (I) |\n| | interpreter
(7) | 11:9,10;24: 18;98: 10; | 18;28: 14,23;29:3; | learn
(4) | , 53: 18
, |\n| | 97: 10,12, 14,15, 18, | 109:25 | 33: 13,20;37:24;38:5, | 25:24;33:16;47:11; | litigating
(I) |\n| | 21;103:18 | June
(I) | 14;39:1,11,14,19; | 68:25 | I
102:13 |\n| | interrogating
(I) | 78:21 | 40: 1;48: 13,13;51 :15; | learned
(6) | litigation
(3) |\n| | 49:19
interrupt
(2) | Justice
(2) | 59:4,4,12;60:9;61
:5, | 29:10;33:15,17; | 152:13;101:19; |\n| | 91:2;94:8 | 7: 14;25:23 | 9,22;62: 16,19,24; | 48: 12;64:23;70: 14 | 107:13 |\n| | interrupting
(I) | K | 63: 18;64:9;65:4, 14, | learning
(2) | l,itt1e(6) |\n| | 41:9 | | 22;66:3,10;67:
10,15,
24;68:4,13,21 ;69:5; | 25:24;31: I | ' 47:7;51:10;56:16; |\n| | into (14) | Kathy
(10) | 70:5,12,18;71 :6; | lease (10)
7: 10;62: 1;67:20, | I 57:10;92:3;105:15
live (3) |\n| | 12:22;19:11;24:10; | 19: 1,6,7,12;21 :8; | 73:6;74: 18;75:6; | 22;68:7,10,16;70:
13; | I
49:2,3;98:3 |\n| | 29:25;30:23;45:21, | 22:8,11,20,23;64:
14 | 76:6,12,17;78:25; | 88:17,21 | lives (6) |\n| | 25;66: 11;72: 10;76:7; | keeps (2) | 79: 12,21;80: 13;81:1, | least (3) | 17:18;25:7;83:12; |\n| | 85:11;86:22;92:11; | 41 :9;88:4 | 6,22;82:2,10,23; | 47:7;70: 16;95:21 | 93:7,9,10 |\n| | 103:11 | kept (I) | 84:10;85:11,14,18; | leave (I) | living (I) |\n| | introduce
(I) | 59:21 | 86: 14,16;87:5;90: 10; | 33:9 | I 33:9 |\n| | 25:9 | key (2) | 95:10,11;97:9,11; | leaving
(2) | LLC (23) |\n| | involve (5) | 5:22;23:25 | 98:2,20;99:3; 101: I, | 42:17;50:5 | 6:11,11;34:18,18; |\n| | 27:24;35:11;38:8, | kidnap
(I) | 17;104: 11;105:7,14, | left (5) | 37:4;61 :6,10;81: 12, |\n| | 9;86: 18 | 47:3 | 18,19; 1~6:20,22; | 42: 17;47:9;49: 10, | 14;85:5,6,7,15;86: 12, |\n| | involved (8) | kidnapped
(3) | 107:4,8,12,14,17 | 10;51 :23 | 13,17,20;87:3,5,8; |\n| | 27:7;57: 12,14, 18; | 42: 15;47:9;48:21 | K-W-O-K
(2) | leftover
(I) | 105:13,14,17 |\n| | 87:3,7,8;92:3 | killed (I) | 18:1;98:2 | 51:24 | I1LC's (I) |\n| | Ira (I) | 11:25 | Kwok's
(36) | legal (8) | I 6: 11 |\n| | 77:25 | kind (3) | 5: 14,17;8:2;9:5; | 4:5; 10:I;25: 17, 19; | located
(I) |\n| | irrelevant
(I) | 31 :5;34: 17;39:23 | 11:23;12:2;14:2; | 26: I;31:6;53:20; | I 48:25 |\n| | 67:13 | kinds (I) | 17:21,23; 18:3, 15,24; | 105:12 | logic (I) |\n| | irrespective
(I) | 37:12 | 19:1;23:7;48:11; | legally (I) | L
39:10 |\n| | 90:1 | Kingdom
(I) | 58:3;62:15,22;64:
16, | 87:13 | ondon
(I) |\n| | Islands
(I) | 84:17 | 21,24;65:4,6;66:
19; | length
(I) | ! 83:12 |\n| | | | | | i |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (7) inquiry - London\n\n| | | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 119
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | long (5)
47: 11;57:2,8; | many (6)
4:3; II: 16;44: 17; | 38:6,6;39: 18;61: 12
merits
(8) | 70:16 | 7: 14;8:9; 106:20
I |\n| | 92: 16;108:21 | 50:5;57: 17;81: 19 | 10:13;12:17;24:3; | monthly
(1) | Myself(l) |\n| | longer (4) | March
(4) | 102:4,12,16; 103:6; | 6:18
months
(7) | I 36:4
mysterious
(1) |\n| | 14:4;70: 17;102:23; | 41 :24;43:6;63:4,5 | 109:21 | 44:17;45:19;49:11, | I 107:10 |\n| | 103:24 | Mark
(3) | message (3) | 14,24;50: 12;78:23 | |\n| | long-term
(1) | 2:21 ;72: 1;75:5 | 19:9,11;22:22 | more (23) | N |\n| | 48:22 | marked
(2) | messages
(1) | 6: 1;9:22; 18:6,9; | I |\n| | look (18) | 77:22;89:6 | 10:7 | 20:9;25: 1;48: 10, 13, | I
name (23) |\n| | 12:10;23: 12;25: 12; | market
(6) | messenger
(2) | 14;49:14,24;50:11; | 6:9;7: I; J 7:4,5,23, |\n| | 28:9,13;29:3,19; | 6:3;55:7,11,12,18, | 22:18,21 | 55: 14;59:25;83 :21, | 25; 18:I;20: 19;56:9; |\n| | 32:11;41:19;53:14, | 20 | met (4) | 22;86:21 ;89:9;90: 16; | 60: 14, 18;64: 16, 17, |\n| | 21 ;54:7;62:9;70: II; | married
(1) | 59:24;75:5; 102: 11; | 94:19;102:9,15; | 18;68: 14;74:4;80: 19; |\n| | 78: 16;92:2;93:2;95:6 | 50:3 | 107:23 | 108:25 | 82:22;88:8;97: 15,15, |\n| | looking (1) | material
(1) | Michael
(4) | morning
(10) | 25;98:3 |\n| | 50:15 | 8:18 | 56: 11;58:2;90:7,7 | 2:7,10,13,21,25; | necessarily
(3) |\n| | Looks (1) | malter
(4) | mid (1) | 3:6; 12: 12;47:24; | I 85: 16;86: 18;87:9 |\n| | 40:20
lot (19) | 2:2;24:22; 104: 1,20
mailers
(1) | 71:2
might (2) | 52:25;56: 16
MOSS (86) | necessary
(2) |\n| | 19:8;20:8,18; | 97:23 | 53:6;98: 10 | 2:9,13,14,24;3:8, | I 14:7;61:1
need (17) |\n| | 24: 16;27: I;31 :2; | may (23) | Miles (7) | 11,14;10:10,18;11:4, | 6:23;10:2;11:15; |\n| | 42:8,20;47:8;48:
18; | 8:21 ;9:7; 19:19; | 20: 17;21: 16,19,21, | 20; 12: 10;16: 14, 19, | 25 :9;32: 13;45 :2; |\n| | 49: 16;50:21 ;52: 19, | 33:6;38: 1;41:4,22; | 24;48: 13;59:4 | 22;17:11,18;19:19, | 50: 13;53:7;54: 13; |\n| | 21;53: 17;54:9;75: 12; | 43:5,13;47: 1;55:22; | Mileson
(5) | 24;23: 17,22;24: 12; | 74: II ;76:21 ;77:9; |\n| | 98:6;99:3 | 67: 10;70: 10;74: 18; | 64: 16,20,21 ;82: 17; | 28:4;34:3,8;38:22; | 83:3;98:20; I07:3; |\n| | lots (2) | 75:11;77:16;83:18; | 83:6 | 41: 14;43: 13, 19; | 108:3;109:16 |\n| | 29:21 ;51:24 | 86: 10;91 :24;95:6; | million (8) | 44: I0;46:7,1 0, 18; | needed
(3) |\n| | loud (2) | 104: 15;108:5; 109:2 | 21:2,7;22:4,23; | 47:20;54:3;55:
14,17, | I 2:7;32:8;67:5 |\n| | 17:3;56:10 | maybe
(3) | 61:21;63:23,24;64:
1 | 21 ;89:23;90:2,4,21, | needs (1) |\n| | loyal (1) | 12:4;53: 18;99: 1 | millions
(1) | 24;91:6,11,17,20; | 15:18
I |\n| | 50:1 | mean (1I) | 42:12 | 92: 1,7, 12,20,25;93:4, | negotiate
(1) |\n| | LP (1) | 35:2;36:22,24; | mind (1) | 7,9,13,15,18,22;94:5; | I 27:25 |\n| | 73:13 | 38: I, I,4;48: 10; | 53:3 | 95: 15;96: 14, 16;97:9; | Neither
(1) |\n| | lunch (2)
99:1,8 | 52: 16;54: 19;67: I; | minimum
(1) | 98:21,24;99:9,14,17; | I 4:25 |\n| | | 91: 18
meaning
(2) | 106:21
Minister
(1) | 100:5,9,13,19;104:2,
5,9; 105: 15, 18,21 ,25; | . nephew
(1) |\n| | M | 36:13;55:10 | 84:17 | 106:6,11,15,18; | I 48:20
nephews
(1) |\n| | | means
(1) | minute
(1) | 107:7,21 | I 48:15 |\n| | main (2) | 22:10 | 61:12 | most (1) | nervous
(9) |\n| | 104:9,10 | meet (5) | minutes
(5) | 54:9 | I 30: 19,20,22;31 :4,8, |\n| | Mainland
(1) | 4:5;7:3; 16:1;50: I; | 9:4;32: 19;39:6; | motion
(1I) | 22;36: 16, 18;47: 14 |\n| | 49:2 | 107:24 | 58:19;91:9 | 5:18;8:18;11:21; | New (34) |\n| | mainly (1) | meeting
(7) | misreading
(1) | 12:16; 13:21 ;23:8; | 6: 11;9: 18;17:6,6; |\n| | 59:23 | 27:25;62:4,13; | 7:14 | 25: 15;29:21 ;73: 13; | 18:19;23:5;27:3; |\n| | maintenance
(3) | 83:22,23,25;84:2 | misrepresentations
(6) | 108:6,17 | 34: 15, 18,18,23;49:5, |\n| | 61: 18;62:20;81:4 | meetings
(1) | 7:7;8:8,17,19;9:
19; | motions
(3) | 8;51: 12,17, 19,21,23; |\n| | makes (2) | 58:19 | 24:25 | 13:24;16:6,21 | 52: 1,2;56: 12, 12; |\n| | 9: 18;99: I | meets (1) | misrepresenting
(1) | move (8) | 57: 12;59: I;86: 12, 14, |\n| | making
(5) | 4:21 | 8:9 | 3:2;46: 18, 19;49:5; | 19,22;87:3;98:22,24; |\n| | 45:5;52: 16,17; | member
(5) | missing (1) | 56: 17;70:2;99:2; | 106:6,12,22 |\n| | 66:4;103:14
malfeasance
(1) | 18:10,14;48:19;
105:14,19 | 95:6
misstates
(1) | 109:21 | Next (9) |\n| | 5:2 | members
(2) | 28:25 | moved (1) | 6:5;7: 16;32:24; |\n| | management
(2) | 18:13;57:16 | mockery
(1) | 63:18
moving
(1) | 55:25;63: 14;88:24; |\n| | 57:8;58:10 | memorandum
(1) | 9:14 | 72:10 | 89:3;95: 15;97:8
niece (2) |\n| | manager
(3) | 70:2 | Mom (1) | much
(4) | I 48:15,19 |\n| | 56:25;57:11,11 | memorialized
(1) | 51:2 | 63:24;81 :3;97: 1; | Nine (1) |\n| | manages
(1) | 32:15 | momept
(2) | 103:24 | I 57:5 |\n| | 83:2 | memory
(3) | 30:2;83:17 | multi-media
(1) | nitpick
(1) |\n| | Mandarin
(4) | 7: I;30:22;42:23 | money (3) | 13:2 | I 62:9 |\n| | 30:25;97: 14, 17,21 | mention
(3) | 8:20;33:2;99: 13 | multiple
(3) | iObOdY (3) |\n| | Mannis
(1) | 22: 14;38:2;39:23 | month
(5) | 48:25;70:8;94:9 | 33:4,5;105:2 |\n| | 65:1 | mentioned
(4) | 50: 10;55: 19,19,20; | must (3) | r
one (I) |\n| | | | | | |\n\n- -- -\n\nMin-[J-Scripl@ (8) long - None\n\n| | | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 120
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 81:5 | off (9) | opporlunily
(2) | 6:9; 11:17;28: 17, | barties
(4) |\n| | normal
(I) | 20:11;24:23;47:10; | 16:11;36:10 | 18,19;29:6,8;34:
18; | I 3:5,18;44:5;90:20 |\n| | 96:8 | 55:18,19;57:15; | opposing
(I) | 60:3,14,18;68:
14; | parlner
(I) |\n| | nole (4) | 104:3,5,6 | 5:18 | 74:4;80:19;81:
16,17, | I 58:7 |\n| | 2:4,11;30:1;97:13 | offer (14) | opposilion
(3) | 19;96:9; 105:7 | parIs (2) |\n| | noled (I) | 6:4;20: 19,24;21 :2, | 12:1;23:8;25:15 | owned
(9) | I 18:11;96:6 |\n| | 59:2 | 10,13;22:5,12,17,23, | option
(I) | 7:25;8:5;27: 11,11; | party
(13) |\n| | notes (I) | 25;23:23;78:
12; | 8: II | 28:23;86: 13;95:8; | 9:7,8;20:9;42: 16; |\n| | 63:4
notice (16) | 92:23
offered
(5) | oral (4) | 105: 14, 17 | 47:3;48: 18;49: 16; |\n| | 76:17;85:11,16,17, | 62:16,16;71:12; | 44:2,16;102:6; | owner
(12) | 50:6,14,20,25;86:
17, |\n| | 19;98: 17,19;104:5,7, | 96:14,16 | 109:12
order
(26) | 30:6;79:21 ;80:22; | 20
pass (I) |\n| | 10,11,12; 106: 17,24; | oflband
(I) | 13:4;46: 14;75:22; | 81:8, 10;85: 15;86:2,
15;88:5,20; 105: 12; | |\n| | 108:11;109:1 | 81:18 | 76:2,16;78:21 ;79:4; | 106: 13 | I 31:21
passed (2) |\n| | noticed (I) | office (I) | 80: 13;88:7;91 :5; | ownership
(17) | I 22:22;47: 16 |\n| | 96:2 | 52:2 | 98:7; 102:9,25;104:6, | 8:4; 15:7,8, 10,13; | passel (I) |\n| | notify (I) | OFFICER
(9) | 7,10,11,23;105:2; | 28:6,8;29: 17;30: 15; | I 12:20 |\n| | 70:18 | 17:9;27: 15;56:24; | 106: 18,22,25,25; | 32:21 ;39:2;85: 14; | passport
(I) |\n| | November
(I) | 75: 13;76:5;77: 12; | 107:2;108:2,15 | 86:3,12,17,20;105:23 | 50:17
I |\n| | 20:1 | 78:9;98:4;99:23 | ordered
(2) | owns (21) | Paul (I) |\n| | number
(9) | official (5) | 103:19,21 | 10:20;27: 18;28: 14; | I 99:18 |\n| | 2: 1;5:23,25; 12:18; | 53:20;78:8;97:
12, | orders
(2) | 29:3,9;32: 1;33: 13,21, | pause (4) |\n| | 48: 13,16, 16;76:22; | 17,21 | 11:10;102:21 | 21,24;34: 13,15,18, | 4:23;24: 15;56: I; |\n| | 91:23 | old (3) | ordinary
(I) | 22;86: 13, 13,14; | I
83:19
I |\n| | numbers
(2) | 49:11,12;50:23 | 32:18 | 95: 12; 105: 18; 106:2, | PAX (2) |\n| | 91:21,24 | O'Melveny
(4) | organizations
(I) | 7 | I
12:2;73: 13 |\n| | 0 | 2:14,15,18;69:1 | 53:24 | | pay (4) |\n| | | once (2) | originally
(2) | P | I 9:2;11:9;62:19; |\n| | | 102:7;104:13 | 92:23;99:4 | | 81:4 |\n| | object(4) | one (53) | Ostrager
(2) | Pacific
(I) | paying (I) |\n| | 14:I0;71: 17;89:21; | 4: 18,18,23;5:23; | 7:14;25:23 | 2:2 | I 8:22 |\n| | 94:19 | 10:18;11:20;13:9; | others
(3) | package
(3) | people (16) |\n| | objeclion
(31) | 15:I; 18:9,13, 14, 18; | 53:23,24;54:2 | 58:21,21,22 | 18:6,9;22: 18;27:5, |\n| | 23:23;24: 13;26:8;
27: 13;28:25;32:9; | 22:4;24: I, 15;29: 13;
32:8,13;41: 18;42:2, | otherwise
(I)
108:13 | page (18) | 9;28:2,3;31: 14, 18; |\n| | 41 :8;43:20,20,25; | 10,11 ;44:5;45:9, 13; | ought
(I) | 20: 17;21 :20;26:6;
29: 19;31 :25;34:5; | 39:23;42:6;48:
13;
67:4,4,7;81: 19 |\n| | 54:3;60:5,20,22; | 47: 15;49: I0;50:23; | 71: 16 | 38: 12;39:25;40: 15, | people's
(I) |\n| | 62:6;63: II ;66:6; | 51: I;55: 14,19, 19,20; | ourselves
(2) | 22,23,24;69:
17; | I 31 :16 |\n| | 67: 12;68:9;70:7; | 62: 15;66: 19;74: 1; | 45: 14;62:20 | 78: 17;91: 16,20,23; | percent
(3) |\n| | 71: 11;72:9, 18;74:5, | 77:4;83:21,22;84:16; | out (12) | 92:1 | 35: 18;36:8;45:4 |\n| | 14,16,20;78: 15; | 85:6,6;96:24;98:8; | 4:2; 19:8;44:2; | pages (2) | I
Perfect
(I) |\n| | 94:14,17,23 | 100:22;103:19; | 47: 12;53:22;68:22; | 42:11,12 | I
16:19 |\n| | objections
(13) | 104: 10,21;105:5,9, | 70:22;85: 19;89:3; | paid (I) | perhaps
(I) |\n| | 10:12;12:20;15:24; | 18,20; 108:5 | 91: 16;95:3; 100:21 | 52: 17 | I 89:5 |\n| | 89:7,14,19;90: I; | one-day
(I) | outline
(I) | paper
(6) | period
(4) . |\n| | 92:9;93:24;94:9; | 45:24 | 99:2 | 28:6,8;30:9;31
:7; | I 61:18;66:1;70:15; |\n| | 95:3,19,21 | ones (2) | out-of-slate
(I) | 43:1;90:20 | I 80:12 |\n| | obligations
(I) | 41:18;96:5 | 93:14 | papers
(II) | perjury
(I) |\n| | 6:19 | ongoing
(I) | outside
(I) | 7:12,15;12:1; | I 5:16 |\n| | obtained
(4) | 24:3 | 45:13 | 29: 17,21;46:2;69: I,4, | perplexed
(I) |\n| | 22: 10,15;45:8,8 | only (13) | outstanding
(I) | 4;76: 11,15 | I 92:3 |\n| | obviate
(I) | 2:8;31: 19;47:6; | 52:21 | paragraph
(6) | person
(17) |\n| | 108:3 | 59:20;83:7,8;91:
14; | over (4) | 28:24;54: 15, 17,20, | 18:7;19:5;35:17; |\n| | obviously
(4) | 92: 14;93:25;94:3; | 41: 18;51:22;57: 10; | 21;78:17 | 42:5,14;47:7;50:
I; |\n| | 22: 17;24:8,14;. | 102: 17;105:22;106:3 | 79:12 | parents
(I) | 66:4,21,22;67:2; |\n| | 107:22
occupancy
(6) | opening
(3)
3:9;9:4; I00:21 | overruled
(4) | 48:15 | I 81:6;82: 18,20,21; |\n| | 61:23;67: 17,18,24; | operate
(2) | 27: 14;94:21,25;
95:22 | part
(6) | 84: I0;88: 17 |\n| | 68:7,18 | 52:3,5 | overview
(I) | 5:24; 16: 10;53: 10,
12;89:22;96: I | personal
(42)
22: 15, 16,19;26:24; |\n| | occurred
(I) | Operating
(3) | 3:16 | particular
(3) | 27:7,21;28:1;29:11; |\n| | 96:6 | 56:24;76:5;78:9 | owed (I) | 24:1;46:4;61:13 | 30: 18;31 :20;32:20; |\n| | o'clock (I) | operation
(2) | 107:5 | particularly
(I) | 33:3,11;34: 14;35:3,9, |\n| | 99:16 | 52:15,16 | own (19) | 72:3 | 11,18,22,24;36: I,5,7, |\n| | | | | | |\n\n-- -- --\n\nMin-U-Script@ (9) normal- personal\n\n| | | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 121
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 13,22;37:6,9,13,15, | 2:4,11;17:3;21:16, | preferable
(I) | 15:23;104:10; | I 45:14 |\n| | 20;43:9;49: I8;53: I;
54:8,16,18,22;55:9; | 18,21;26:7;40: 10;
56:9;69: 17;74:2; | 46:19
preference
(I) | 105:5 | pulled (I) |\n| | 62:7;67: 18;68: 19; | 97:12,25 | 77:1 | proceed
(7)
2:8;16:17;41:19; | 45:13
purchase
(19) |\n| | 84:3 | pledge (37) | prejudgment
(I) | 94: 15; 100:3; 107:25; | 8:20; 15:3;33:2,8, |\n| | personally
(4) | 24:4,5,15,19;38:2, | 44:17 | 108:4 | 11;44:3;57: 12;58:4, |\n| | 27:22;37:23;61 :25; | 7,10;41 :2,4,22;43 :6, | prejudice
(2) | proceeding
(3) | 12;59:7;61 :3, 14; |\n| | 67:24 | 10;44:9,11,18,21; | 108:10,23 | 9: 14;25:20;46: 14 | 62: 15;83:23;86: 19, |\n| | persons
(I) | 45:1,6,11,18,19;46:3, | prejudiced
(I) | proceedings
(3) | 22;87:7;90: 10, 13 |\n| | 108:II | 6,11,12,14;47: 14; | 107:20 | 9: 19;56:2;83:20 | purchased
(II) |\n| | phone (I) | 68:8,20;72:5;76:
12; | pre-marked
(I) | process
(10) | :
27:22,23;33:10; |\n| | 84:1 | 79:3; 101:20,21 ,23; | 76:25 | 6:7;10:1;57:13; | 65: 15;67: 15;68: 13; |\n| | phrased
(I)
103:10 | 107:12;108:12
pledged
(24) | prepare
(I)
106:25 | 58: 14;59: 13;62:25; | , 70:12;81:6,13;101:1; |\n| | pieces (I) | 7:9,13;24:20; | prepared
(2) | 65: 13, 16,17;84: 13
production
(I) | 107:8
I
purchaser
(4) |\n| | 43:1 | 37: 19;39: 12,15,20; | 9:15;103:15 | 15:25 | 8:25;60:17;63:15; |\n| | piercing
(14) | 40:2,5,19;41 :21;43:5, | present
(2) | professional
(2) | 64:5 |\n| | 4: 15,15,24;5:7,8,9; | 8,8;68:21 ;69:3 ;70:6, | 90:23;96:12 | 47:5,6 | I
purchasers
(I) |\n| | 100:7,16,18,22; | 13,17,19,23; 101:I8; | presentation
(6) | project
(I) | I 85:5 |\n| | 102:20,25; 103: 12, 16 | 105:1,9 | 13:3,22; 16:4;84:3; | 42:9 | purchases
(I) |\n| | Ping (I) | pledges
(IS) | 89:4,22 | proof (2) | 57:18 |\n| | 17:5 | 5:23;7:8;24: 17,23, | (4)
presented | 4:19;103:2 | purchase-sale
(1) |\n| | place (3) | 25;37:3,16,25;38:5, | 12:19;13:5;88:11; | proper
(2) | I 87:6 |\n| | 45:6; 104:6; I09:2
placed (I) | 15;44: 1,6,7;45: 16;
105:3 | 97:5
presently
(I) | 15:22;24:9 | purchasing
(3) |\n| | 76:12 | pledging
(2) | 109:10 | property
(4)
58: 17;87:4;98: 12; | I 14:2;58:16;64:6
purely
(1) |\n| | places (I) | 37:22;106:24 | President
(IS) | 107:23 | I 104:4 |\n| | 48:25 | plus (3) | 6:6;7: I8;27:3; | propose
(I) | purported
(2) |\n| | plainly (I) | 31: 13;36: 15;67: 19 | 51: 16;52: 11;56:23; | 100:3 | , 60:10,14 |\n| | 11:7 | pm (2) | 57:24,25;58: 1,3;59:1, | proposing
(2) | purporting
(1) |\n| | plaintiff
(8) | 99:24; 103:22 | 22;78:9;90:8;93:
10 | 100: 18,20 | I 60:3 |\n| | 2: 14,16, I8; 10:2; | pockets
(I) | presume
(I) | proprietary
(9) | purpose
(3) |\n| | 102:10,19;103:25;
107:5 | 109:8
point (12) | 79:11 | 62: 1;67:20,21; | I 9:8,10;73:12 |\n| | plaintiffs
(16) | 5:5; 13:25;44:5,5,6; | pretenses
(I)
107:9 | 68:6,10,16;70: 13;
88: 17,21 | purposes
(2) |\n| | 13:22; 14:13;16:3, | 45:9,15,19;47:
14; | pretty
(I) | prospective
(2) | I 12:15;25:8
pursuant
(I) |\n| | 10;76:3;78:24;79:6, | 95:25; 104:14;108: 16 | 12:7 | 60:16;63:15 | i
45:22 |\n| | 7;89:6;97:2; 100:3,7; | points
(I) | previously
(4) | protect
(I) | put (25) |\n| | 102:I, 14,25; 109:8 | 95:19 | 2:6;28: 16,19;52:20 | 62:20 | 3:4;4:2;6:2,15; |\n| | plaintifrs
(2) | political
(I) | price (I) | protection
(I) | 13:10;19:11;20:19, |\n| | 14:5;98:11 | 107: 10 | 58:18 | 102:10 | 23;24: 19;25:2;26:23; |\n| | plan (I) | portion
(5) | prime
(2) | proud
(I) | 41 :23;42:20;48: 18, |\n| | 38:3 | 21:18,21;92:15; | 13:9;84:17 | 52:24 | 21 ;54: 12;58:20,21, |\n| | play (10)
9:5; 10:4; 11:14,14; | 96:20;97:1
portions
(6) | principal
(I)
5:17 | prove
(10) | 22;62:24;89:20,23, |\n| | 13:15;28:4;92: 14,16; | 12:23;89:7,19; | prior
(8) | 4:9,10,14,25;5:4,9,
21;7:15;12:16; | 25;91:7;103:15
putting
(3) |\n| | 93:25;96:20 | 92: 10;93:21 ;96:22 | 5:18;11:21;25:6; | 100:22 | : 12:11;57:14;79:10 |\n| | played (13) | position
(10) | 26: I8,19;53:9;62:14; | provide
(8) | PX (6) |\n| | 10:9,17;11:3,19; | 42: 18;56:22;57:2; | 106:22 | 3:15;13:4;17:13; | 19:24;23:17;43:19; |\n| | 12:5,9;28:5;91: 1; | 72:25;88:21; 100:6, | priority
(2) | 59: 15;60: 13;65: 13; | 46:24;69:8,12
1 |\n| | 94: 16,22;95: I, 14; | 14;101:1,8,24 | 24:7,22 | 104:12;106:20 | |\n| | 96:23 | possible
(I) | prisoner
(I) | provided
(II) | Q
I |\n| | playing
(10) | 50:14 | 107:10 | 7:20;59: I8, 19,20; | |\n| | 90:6;91:5,8,12,13,
16;92: 15;93: 16;94: I; | potential
(3)
4: I; 107: 12;109: I | probability
(I)
3:19 | 65: 14,15;69: 13; | 4uality
(I) |\n| | 96:22 | practical
(2) | probably
(4) | 78:20;80:4;81:
I;
98:18 | ; 92:2
quick
(3) |\n| | pleaded
(I) | 103:25;104:20 | 31 :23;92: 13;96: 10; | provides
(I) | I 48:2;87:24;95:
19 |\n| | 100:15 | practice
(I) | 99:9 | 102:9 | quickly
(4) |\n| | pleading
(I) | 65:20 | problem
(8) | public
(2) | 3:3;11:25;53:21; |\n| | 24:9 | precluding
(I) | 4: I8;7: 10;24:7; | 6:1;9: 12 | 73:5 |\n| | pleasantries
(2) | 106:22 | 104:9; 105:6; 108: 19, | publicly
(I) | 1
quietly
(I) |\n| | 83:7,8 | prefer
(I) | 21,22 | 8:3 | I 11 :25 |\n| | please (13) | 107:22 | problems
(3) | pull (I) | quit (I) |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@\n\n(10) personally - quit\n\n| | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | Case 22-50073
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 122
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n| | KwokHoWan | | of 126 | | April
26, 2019 |\n| | | | | | |\n| | 42:16 | 18:25;102:1 | 3:2,9 | 6:21 | ~uling (1) |\n| | quite (5) | recess (2) | remember
(13) | respond
(6) | I 103:4 |\n| | 33:22;35:3;52:25; | 56:5;99:25 | 5:23;31 :4,9,23; | 10:7; 16:14;46:7; | rulings
(1) |\n| | 91:15;92:12 | recognize
(3) | 38:7;39:21 ;42:2,10; | 65:8,11;71:10 | 103:6
I |\n| | quitted
(1) | 15:16;31: 16;47: 15 | 43: 12;46:25;61: 19; | responded
(3) | running
(1) |\n| | 51:24 | recollection
(2) | 63:7;84:7 | 71:15,18;82:9 | I 109:8 |\n| | quoted
(1) | 21:2;66:13 | removed
(3) | response
(5) | Russ (2) |\n| | 11:21 | recommended
(1) | 98:13;101:21,24 | 71 :6;72:2,4,24; | I 2: 19,22 |\n| | | 90:13 | rendered
(1) | 86:7 | |\n| | R | recommending
(1) | 98: 11 | responsibilities
(3) | S
I |\n| | | 7:23 | renew (2) | 52:4,7,10 | |\n| | raise (1) | reconcile
(1) | 108:7,24 | responsibility
(2) | I
safeguards
(4) |\n| | 15:23 | 72:23 | Renminbi
(1) | 36:7;52:12 | :
6:16,23;61:14,16 |\n| | raised (2) | record
(6) | 59:23 | responsible
(7) | sale (9) |\n| | 14:1;102:6 | 2:5;3:4,7;29:25; | repeat
(1) | 8:22;31: 19;35: 18, | 15:2;44:3;75:24, |\n| | ralher
(2) | 74:7;95:25 | 47:1 | 23,25;36:8;58:11 | 24;76:7;86: 19,22; |\n| | 35:4,12 | records
(2) | repeated
(1) | responsive
(1) | 87:8; 104: 13 |\n| | reach (3) | 88:4;106:13 | 8:16 | 51:6 | sales (2) |\n| | 4:2; 19:8; 102:24 | redacted
(1) | reporter
(2) | rest (1) | I 57: 18;105:4 |\n| | read (27) | 20:19 | 99:21,22 | 101:25 | same (7) |\n| | 13:8,12,18; 15:1,5; | RE-D1RECT
(3) | represent
(2) | result
(1) | 5:7;6:23; 17:25; |\n| | 19:7,10;21 :7,16,18, | 55: 16;74:24;84:22 | 75:6;103:6 | 61:14 | 35: 15;43:24;73: 18; |\n| | 21;22:1;26:11,21; | reference
(5) | representation
(2) | reveal (1) | 103:3 |\n| | 30:5;31 :6, 12;34:4, | 4:22;53:7;84:3,14, | 44:25;45:5 | 109:4 | Sarnoff
(24) |\n| | 20;38: 12;53: 14,19; | 16 | representative
(1) | review (4) | |\n| | 69:2,19;72: 17,19; | refresh
(1) | 10:22 | | I 2:15,15;56:15; |\n| | 89:8 | 66:13 | representatives
(3) | 42:21;53:14,16; | 59:2;60:24;61 :4; |\n| | reading
(6) | refreshed
(1) | | 58:19 | I 66: 12;69: 14;70:3, 10; |\n| | | | 7:7;65:25;66:20 | reviewed
(3) | 71:21;72:1,11,14,20, |\n| | 34:5,8;41:10; | 21: 1 | represented
(1) | 7: 19;79: 18;90: 12 | 22;74: 10,23;78: 15; |\n| | 47: 12;89: 14;97:4 | refuse (1) | 7:9 | reviewing
(2) | 84:23;85:3;92:
18; |\n| | readings
(2) | 32:10 | representing
(1) | 3:15;58:12 | 108:5,14 |\n| | 12:25;13:6 | refused
(3) | 70:5 | right
(82) | sat (I) |\n| | real (3) | 11:17;13:11;32:6 | request
(6) | 3: 10;6:2; 17:19,25; | I
62:13 |\n| | 13:14;16:8;47:6 | regarding
(5) | 10:8;64:3,24;65:3, | 18:16,19,22; 19:1,4, | satisfy (1) |\n| | realized
(1) | 78: 1,2; 103:5,15; | 9;66:18 | 17;20: 1,4,24;21 :3,7, | I 98:7 |\n| | 101:20 | 107:18 | requested
(5) | 9,10,24;22: 1,5,7,22, | save (1) |\n| | really (10) | registered
(1) | 28:2;32: 12;33:6, | 25;23:4,10,18;25:
15, | I 89:5 |\n| | 9: 16;13:16;25:9; | 88:12 | 18;100:9 | 23;26:4,25;27:11,12, | saw (11) |\n| | 36: 13;42:21,25; | regurgitation
(2) | requests
(3) | 19;28:7;29: 16;30: 15; | 7: 12;13:10;21 :23; |\n| | 47: 16;87:20,23; | 13:23;46:1 | 66:1,7,10 | 31: 10,22;32:7;33:2,4, | 22: 11;28:6,8;41: I; |\n| | 95:12 | re-introduction
(1) | required
(4) | 10,14;34: 13,16;36:7, | 46:20,24;59:20;69:4 |\n| | reason
(3) | 16:5 | 5:5;58:21 ;76: 17; | 17,21 ;37:5,16,19,22, | saying (9) |\n| | 10:22;48:21 ;98:6 | reiteration
(1) | 80:24 | 25;40: 16,19,24;41:4, | 11:23;13:13;21:9; |\n| | reasons
(4) | 16:4 | requires
(3) | 19;42:23;46: 17,21; | 26:3;37: 1;47: 10; |\n| | 6:23;49:25;63:7; | (I)
reject | 3:24;4:25;75:23 | 47:20;48: 16;55:7; | 50: 18,22; I09:20 |\n| | 103:10 | 88: 13 | re-registered
(1) | 62: 17;69:6;76: 13; | school (2) |\n| | re-boa rd (1) | related
(1) | 88:8 | 79:25;84: 18;90:24; | I
49:12;50:2 |\n| | 65:17 | 108:5 | reserve
(1) | 91 :21;92: 12;93:3,6; | scoping
(1) |\n| | recall (24) | released
(4) | 74:23 | 94:15;98:5;99:7,11; | |\n| | 29:22,23;30:3,11
; | 44:21 ;45: 1,6,11 | residence
(9) | 100:2,17; 103: 17; | I 10:11
search
(1) |\n| | 32:3;34: 1,10,25; | relevance
(12) | 101:2,18,21; | 104: 11 | |\n| | 38: 17;40:7;42:23; | 24: 13;43:20,24; | 104: 14;107:9,12,16, | role (3) | I 10:7 |\n| | 59:9,17;60: 16;61:16, | 46:4,8;60:23 ;62:8, | 19;108:13 | | Searles
(40) |\n| | 22;62:21 ;63:21,23; | 10;68: 12;94:9,13,24 | resides
(1) | 52:11;57:11,12 | 2:19,19;23:25; |\n| | 64: 13,14;66:2, 18; | relevant
(9) | | Roscalitar
(1) | 26:8,11 ;27: 13;28:25; |\n| | 68:6 | | 93:10 | 41:2 | 32:9,12,25;41 :8,17; |\n| | | 11:8;12:21;24:24; | resolved
(2) | roughly
(2) | 43: 17,24;44: 14,23; |\n| | receive (2) | 25: 1;60:6;63: 12,13; | 38:3;42:25 | 57: 17;63:23 | 45:4;47:23;48:
1; |\n| | 85:10,11 | 71:19;95:12 | resolving
(1) | rule (2) | 53:5;54:5;55:2,13; |\n| | received
(11) | relied (2) | 16:1 | 24:23 ;92: I0 | 89: 16,25;90:3;91 :2, |\n| | 6:4;20: 14;49: 15; | 5:19;7:22 | respect
(7) | ruled
(1) | 10,14,18,23;92:22; |\n| | 64:25;72:3,12;78: 14; | relief (2) | 24:4;43:25;71 :9; | 26:10 | 94:7,13;95: 18,24; |\n| | 79:3,6,12;80:6 | 109:13,15 | 73: I;74:
15;100:7,25 | rules (2) | 96: 13,17,24;97:6 |\n| | recently
(2) | remarks
(2) | respectfully
(1) | 68: 19;94:6 | seat (2) |\n| | | | | | I |\n\nMin-U-Script@ (11) quite - seat\n\n| Case 22-50073 | Doc 440-15 | Filed 05/25/22 | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 123
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v.
Kwok Ho Wan | | of 126 | | |\n| | | | | April 26, 2019 |\n| 56: 13;98:4 | sets (2) | 67:21,24;68:4,16,18, | 64: 16,21,24;65:4,6, | I
state (4) |\n| | | | | |\n| seated (I) | 16:6;46:2 | 19;69:5;75:24;78:6 | 12;66:4,21,24,24; | 117:4;56:9;97:25; |\n| 17:7 | seven (4) | significant
(4) | 67:8;82:4,18;83:5; | 98:13 |\n| second (16) | 9:4; 18:6,7;48: 14 | 8:16;9:22;10:11; | 107:16 | stated
(I) |\n| 4: 14,18;5:2;30: 18, | several
(2) | 21:6 | son's
(I) | I 68:7 |\n| 24,25;48:2;50:3,4; | 3:1;75:10 | significantly
(I) | 7:1 | statement
(6) |\n| 53: 17;78: 17;83:23; | shaking
(I) | 99:6 | Sorry
(28) | |\n| 96:24;104:18; | | | | I 26:18,19;30:14; |\n| | 31:12 | signing
(I) | 20:10,11;36:15,18, | 40: 18;46: 13;50: 18 |\n| 109:13,16 | shell (2) | 67:19 | 19;39:13;40:23;51 :5, | statements
(3) |\n| Secrecy (I) | 8:21;10:19 | similar
(I) | 8,8,8,8;52:9;54:25; | I 26:24;35: 15;37:8 |\n| 7:2 | Sherry
(4) | 6:23 | 55: 1,1;66:8;68: 13; | States
(3) |\n| secreted
(I) | 57:3;81:19,22; | similarly
(I) | 71: 14;77:7;85: 1,2; | I 14:16;60:11,18 |\n| 98:12 | 109:24 | 6:21 | 91 :2;93:8;94: 18; | status
(I) |\n| sections (2) | | | | |\n| | Sherry-Netherland
(69) | simple (2) | 98:23; 100: 12;101:6 | I 99:1 |\n| 96:4,9 | 6:6,8,15;7:8,11,12, | 11:2;43:3 | sort (2) | step (2) |\n| secure
(I) | 17,21;8:5,7,11,19; | single (I) | 59:12;108:7 | I 48: I;55:22 |\n| 62:3 | 15:3;20:20;56:21; | 28:6 | sought
(3) | still (6) |\n| security
(II) | 57:19,21;58:11;59:7; | Sister
(2) | 63: 19;64:6;86:3 | I 25:24;29:7;30:20; |\n| 6:16;61:17,19; | 60:9,13,17,25;61 :3,6, | 50:12,16 | sound
(2) | |\n| | | | | 47: 15;48: 17;I03:7 |\n| 63: 19,24;64:7;67: 17, | 13;63:10;64:2,5; | sister-in-law
(2) | 13:5;15:15 | stipulate
(4) |\n| 18;80:24;81: 1,3 | 65:8,11 ;67:21 ;68:3, | 48: 16,20 | sounds
(I) | I 12:15;44:11,14,15 |\n| seeing (2) | 20;70: 19;71: 18;72:3, | sit (3) | 24:12 | stipulated
(8) |\n| 9:20;49:23 | 4,16,24;76:6;78:
10; | 30:21 ;38:8;39:6 | speak
(8) | I 3:5,18;12:14,18,21, |\n| seeking
(3) | 79:22;82:9;85: 10, 16, | situated
(I) | 47:7,24;53:
19,23; | 22;46:6;70: 16 |\n| 14:17;108:10; | | | | |\n| | 24,25;86:5,21 ;87: 16; | 6:22 | 60 :6;75:20;83 :8;89:3 | stipulating
(I) |\n| 109:9 | 88: I,4,9, 13, 16,19; | situation
(3) | speaking
(3) | I 46:2 |\n| seemed (I) | 90:9;93:3;98:
15, 16, | 31:24;39:5;50:5 | 49: 1;53: 18;54: 16 | stipulation
(2) |\n| 83:11 | 17;I01:2,5,9;104:
16, | situations
(I) | speaks
(3) | I 24:2;45:1 |\n| seems (I) | 23;106:5,13 | 65:20 | 72: 13;82:25;83: 1 | stock (3) |\n| 83:14 | Sherry-Netherland's
(I) | six (3) | spent(l) | I 88:1,7,12 |\n| | | | | |\n| select (2) | 72:23 | 48: 17;49: 11;50:23 | 47: 11 | stop (I) |\n| 89: 19;91:11 | Sherry's
(I) | size (I) | spoke (I) | I 50: II |\n| selection
(I) | 88:21 | 62:3 | 54:2 | stopped
(3) |\n| 94:1 | ship{l) | skip (I) | spoken
(3) | I 49: 13,22,23 |\n| sell (12) | 57:15 | 59:3 | 83:5,10;89:17 | straight
(I) |\n| 5:25;11:24;14:3; | | | | |\n| | shock (I) | slide (2) | Spring
(13) | I 24:25 |\n| 18:25; 19:17;85: 12; | 88:5 | 4:4;28:13 | 23:5;27:3;42:7; | strategy
(I) |\n| 87:4;98: 18;104: 15; | short
(4) | Sloane (13) | 47:2;51: 16,19,21 ,23; | I 38:3 |\n| 106:16;107:18; | 3: 16;9:3;63: 16; | 19:1,4,6,8, 12,16, | 52:1,1,11,22;53:24 | Street
(2) |\n| 108:12 | 102:22 | 25;21 :8;22:8, 11,20, | squabble
(I) | I 17:6;56:12 |\n| selling (2) | | | | |\n| | shortly
(2) | 23;64:14 | 96:19 | stronger
(I) |\n| 19:4;58:16 | 64:6;70:22 | small (I) | stage (I) | I 9:22 |\n| sells (I) | show (18) | 18:8 | 103:2 | structu
re (4) |\n| 87:5 | 8:14,16,18,20; | sold (I) | stand
(5) | I 6:18;61:6,10;86:12 |\n| send (2) | 9: 15;13: 14;31:5,9, | 55:5 | 14:9;25:4;32:23; | Stuart
(I) |\n| 19:8,11 | 10;42:11,22;47:13; | sale (2) | 55:24;89: I | |\n| sense (3) | | | | I 2:15 |\n| | 60:9;61: 12;66: 12; | 105:14,19 | standard
(9) | studied
(I) |\n| 96:8;97: I;99: I | 71 :21;74:3;90: 16 | solved (I) | 3: 17;4:5,21,24,25; | I 50:3 |\n| sensitive
(I) | showed
(3) | 108:21 | 5:24;7:3; 11:8;65: 19 | stuff{l) |\n| 21:5 | 6:8;8:1;31:11 | somebody
(IO) | standards
(4) | I 47:10 |\n| sent (3) | showing
(4) | 13:15;81: 13;84:8; | 4:24;102:11;103:2, | subject
(7) |\n| 20: 14;59:24;69:5 | 6:20;43: 17;60: 17, | | | |\n| | | 87:25;88:11,12,13; | 3 | 14: 18,20;24:2; |\n| separate
(3) | 18 | 104: 15;105:8; 109: 17 | standing
(I) | 68:11;71:18,19; |\n| 36:20,25;37:2 | shui (I) | somehow
(I) | 51:2 | 100:4 |\n| sequence
(I) | 63:7 | 30:23 | stare
(I) | submit(3) |\n| 92:6 | side (I) | someone
(7) | 36:16 | |\n| | | | | I 6:21;58:23;89:5 |\n| serious
(2) | 90:1 | 8:9;20: 19,23;64:9; | start
(13) | submitted
(16) |\n| 4: 17;26: 1 | sign (2) | 82:3;83:3;84:3 | 3: 11,14;28:2;48:4, | 5: 17;13:24; 15:2; |\n| served (2) | 54:13;61:23 | sometimes
(2) | 8;49:5;51 :25;52:2, | 23:2;25: 14,22;41 :20; |\n| 69:1;76:11 | signature
(I) | 19:15;36:15 | 22;76:20;89: 13;99:5; | 43:4;53: 15,25;60:2; |\n| set (7) | 78:7 | son (24) | | |\n| | | | 102:12 | 84: 13, 16;90: 11; |\n| | | | | |\n| 2:7,8; 10:20,24;
65:3;85: 18;102:7 | signed
(12)
15:4;42:2;54: 10; | 48: 14,19;49:9, 10,
13,21,23;50:23;51: 1; | started
(3)
28:9;48:6;91:
18 | 101:4,8
~ubmitting
(2) |\n\n----------\n\nMill-U-Script@ I\n\n(12) seated - submitting\n\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v. | Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22 | of 126 | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 124
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|\n| KwokHoWan | | | | 26, 2019
April |\n| 53:9;65:22 | (3)
swearing | 17:2;28:22;32:22; | 103:14;107:3 | 3:6;6:25; 10: 10; |\n| suborn
(I) | 26:4;43:5,7 | 38:20;52:25;56:8; | today's
(I) | |\n| | | | | 31:12
I |\n| 5:16 | switching
(I) | 74:3;97:20 | 13:22 | true (5) |\n| subpoena
(I) | 55:2 | testifies (I) | together
(7) | I 76:15;97:24;101:2, |\n| 14:6 | (6)
swore | 15:16 | 18:9;50:3;57: 14; | 9,13
I |\n| subpoenaed
(2) | 5: 19;28: 16;41:21; | testify (8) | 58:20,22,22;79:
10 | trust
(7) |\n| 73:16,17 | 43: II ;44: 11;46: 10 | 5:11;6:7,10,24;7:6, | told (25) | I 6:25;64: 17,19,24; |\n| subsequent
(I) | (12)
sworn | 16;73:15;95:7 | 2:6;7: 13;8:5,6; | 65:6;66:24;81: 17 |\n| 70:15 | 17: 1,9;25:6;26: 18, | (2)
testifying | 10:6;22:11,13,23; | trustee
(2) |\n| subsequently
(I) | 19;27: 10;28: 19;35:6; | 32:23;62:7 | 33:4,5;36:5;39:4,19, | I 58:8,9 |\n| 59:25 | 37:8;56:7;97: 18,19 | (41)
testimony | 21,22,23;40: 1,4; | truth
(5) |\n| succeed (I) | | 5: 14;8:2,5;9:4,7,9, | 49:20;50:4,12,19; | I 5:22;23:24;73:23; |\n| 12:17 | T | 9; 13:4; 16:18;25:6,7; | 65: 12;72: 16;82:9 | 95: 12;97:23 |\n| success (I) | | 26: 12,13;28:21 ;29:I; | Tony (1) | try (13) |\n| 3:19 | table (3) | 32:17;37:11,12; | 84:17 | 10:7;27:5;31: 14; |\n| sue (I) | 21 :2;24:23;47: 10 | 54: 14;62: 10;66: 13, | took (4) | 33:6;43:3;46: 14; |\n| 73:8 | Taiwan
(2) | 15;71: 17;73: 10,21, | 2:8;12:1;51:22; | 47:7,24;53:22;56: 17; |\n| sufficient
(2) | ,
84:6,7 | 25;74:6,9;79:9; | 73:1 | 73: 12;99:2,3 |\n| 5:1;100:15 | tale (1) | 86:25;90: 15,18,25; | top (3) | trying
(II) |\n| (2)
suggested | 95:10 | 93: I;94:9,20;95:4; | 6: 11;21: 15;104:21 | 3: 15;10: 13;24:22; |\n| 100:21;108:21 | talk (5) | 96:4; 101:13;105:6,7 | topics (3) | 27:8;36:18;47:11,18; |\n| summarize
(I) | 7:4;10:14;13:11; | theirs
(2) | 10:18; 11:2;55:2 | |\n| 73:25 | 18:24;38:5 | 45:10,11 | Tor (I) | 50:9;67: II ;74: 19; |\n| summarized
(I) | | | | 109:22 |\n| | talked
(3) | therefore
(3) | 97:15 | Tsang
(I) |\n| 74: 11 | 5:8;11:4,5 | 93:16;101:12; | T-O-R
(I) | j
82:22 |\n| summarizing
(2) | (7)
talking | 108:6 | 97:15 | urn (3) |\n| 74:6;94:19 | 27:21 ;43:2;49: 13, | (6)
third | total (2) | I 40:10;89:3;105:17 |\n| sun (I) | 22,23;50:11;53:22 | 8:11;13:20;45:25; | 9:4; 18:7 | turned
(I) |\n| 107:3 | talks (I) | 50:9;53: 17;86:20 | totally
(2) | I 79:12 |\n| super
(6) | 24:17 | (4)
though | 18:9;30:23 | twice (2) |\n| 30: 19;31:3,7,22; | tape (12) | 32:7;35:6;45: 15; | (3)
touch | I 16:6,21 |\n| 36:16;47:13 | 10:9,17;11:3,19; | 86:21 | 67:5;83:3,3 | twist (I) |\n| supplied
(I) | 12:9;28:5;49: 17; | (8)
thought | (2)
track | I 24:22 |\n| 78:24 | 91: 1;94: 16,22;95: 1, | 4:6,11;12:4,7; | 51: 10;52:23 | two (30) |\n| support
(6) | 14 | 20: 18;62: 18;91:3; | transactions
(1) | 4: 15,23;5:22,25; |\n| 4:5,20;23:7;25: 14; | task (1) | 108:20 | 57:17 | 6: 10;7: 19,24; I0: 19, |\n| 40: 18;84:4 | 12:1 | thousands
(1) | transcript
(6) | 21 ;13:24; 16:6;22: 18; |\n| (2)
supposed | team (I) | 42:12 | 12:24; 13:3;34:4; | 28:24;36:20,25;37: I, |\n| 8:25;52: 18 | 52:12 | threaten
(3) | 89:6,8;92:21 | 12;42: 11;43: I;46:2; |\n| supposedly
(I) | technical
(1) | 42: 16;49: 18;50:7 | transcripts
(3) | 49:25;53:3;78: 18,23; |\n| 11:24 | 31:6 | threatened
(1) | 12:23,23;13:6 | 84:24;90: 19;95: 18; |\n| Supreme
(I) | teed (1) | 48:21 | | |\n| 25:23 | | | transfer
(21) | 99: 15;I00: 14;104:20 |\n| | 9:3 | three
(4) | 6:25;7:2;64: 15,20, | type (4) |\n| Sure (II) | telephonic
(I) | 3:18;43:1;67:19; | 24;65:2,3,22;66:23; | I 58:24;59: 17;63:9,9 |\n| 3:8;5:25;31: 17; | 83:25 | 108: 11 | 85:24;86:3,19;87:8, | typical
(4) |\n| 33:24;35:3,20;52:17, | telling (2) | throughout
(I) | 12;98: 19;101 :20; | I 59:12;63:10,14; |\n| 17;57: 15;62: 10; | 5:22;99:8 | 9:19 | 105:4,23;106:3; | 74:15 |\n| 99:17 | ten (1) | timeline
(1) | 108:13;109:1 | typing
(1) |\n| surprised
(I) | 39:6 | 62:22 | transferred
(8) | I 63:9 |\n| 109:11 | (3)
tenant | times (3) | 85: 14;86: 17;87: 16; | |\n| suspended
(I) | 61 :6,9;80: 15 | 3:1;11:16;50:5 | 88:8,12;95:8;98: 15; | U
I |\n| 108:7 | (2)
tenure | timing (3) | 104:22 | |\n| suspension
(1) | 57:19;61:5 | 44:3;45: 18;63:9 | transferring
(3) | t
Ullman
(18) |\n| 108:16 | (2)
term | title (6) | 64: 10;82:3; 106:23 | 6:5,5, I0, 14,24;7:4, |\n| sustain
(I) | 53: 1;54:22 | 56:23;64: 10;66:24; | transfers
(2) | 6;56:11,16;74:22; |\n| 14:10 | (6)
terminated | 105:24;106:3,9 | 104:18;105:3 | 75:3,7,22;76: 15; |\n| sustained
(10) | 41 :23;43:6,10,11; | today (25) | transit
(I) | 77:22;78: 16;85: I; |\n| 60:8;67: 14;70:9,9, | 44:12;46:12 | 3: 15;4:9, 19;5:5,10, | 17: 12 | |\n| 9;73:2,3;74:8,17,21 | terms
(2) | | | 87:25 |\n| swear (2) | | 12,21;11:14;12:11; | (3)
translate | ultimate
(5) |\n| | 16:15;58:18 | 13:8,25;14:6; 16:3,7; | 15:13;19:10,11 | 174:1;85:15;86:14; |\n| 27: 17;97:22 | terrible
(I) | 24: 16;25:7;44:3; | (2)
translator | 102:15;103:3 |\n| sweared
(I) | II: 13 | 71:20;73: 12,23;94:1; | 5: 14;32:7 | ultimately
(I) |\n| 36:9 | (8)
testified | 98:25; 100:23; | (4)
tried | I 33:2'. |\n\n--------\n\n(13) suborn - ultimately\n\n| Doc 440-15
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
Pacific Alliance
Asia v.
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
of 126
Kwok Ho Wan
I
unavailable
(2)
29:8;50:10
101:23;103:9
16;27: 16;29:5,7, 12,
year (3)
93:13;96:7
Vice (3)
WeChat
(1)
14;32: 12,20,23;39:3;
I 42:3;46:11;63:22
unconditionally
(1)
6:6;56:23;78:8
49:23
43: 15;51 :5,8;54:5,6,
years (11)
8:23
video (22)
weeks (1)
8;55: 1,23,24,25;56:3,
15:8,8;18:21;
under
(7)
7: 17;9: 15; 10:9, 17;
7:19
11;66:9,11,12;67:3;
49:11,12;50:23;57:5,
3:23,24;5:24;9:6;
11:3,19;12:9;28:5;
Wei (5)
68:23;69: 16;70: 14,
10;59: I;62: 18;75: 10
104:11;107:9;108:14
49:24;50: 17,21 ,22,
105:6,8,8,9; 107: 10
22,25;71 :2,4,24;
York (29)
underlying
(1)
25;89:4,22;90:
16;
W-E-I
(1)
75: 15;77:17,21 ;86: I,
6: II ;9: 18;17:6,6;
53:10
91: I;94: 16,22;95: 1,
107:10
6,9;87: 13,17;88:24,
18:19;23:5;27:3;
understands
(I)
14,20
Welcome
(1)
25;89: 1,3;93: 14;
34: 15,18, 18,23;49:5,
15:9
view (4)
2:23
95:7,15;96:7;97:8,
8;51:12,17,19,21,23;
understood
(8)
67:10,13;74:18;
weren't
(4)
24;98:2
52: 1,2;56: 12, 12;
10:14;15:18;19:13;
99:4
26:3;84: 14;93:24;
witnesses
(2)
59: 1;86: 12,14;87:3;
25: 17,19,25;54: 10;
violate
(1)
94:11
3:16;5:11
106:7,12,23
85:9
68:10
West (1)
witness's
(1)
younger
(2)
unfortunately
(1)
violation
(2)
56: 11
86:24
50:12,19
I
75:21
70:12,19
What's
(4)
woman
(1)
YouTube
(2)
Uniqueness
(1)
Virgin
(1)
17:23;46:2;58:21 ;
35:10
I 11:21,22
60:24
106:8
Wong (1)
77:22
Yvette (4)
unit (I)
voice (8)
WhatsApp
(1)
20:3
116:23;20:3;21:15,
87:15
11:23;12:3;13:15,
49:23
word
(2)
18
United (4)
16;17:3;49: 17;50:21;
whenever
(2)
8:12;47:15
Yvetteyue423
(I)
14:16;60:11,18;
56:10
108:24,25
words
(1)
I
20:4
84:17
voluntarily
(1)
Whereupon
(23)
51: I
Z
university
(1)
14:8
3: 12;17:15;19:20,
work
(10)
I
48:8
volunteer
(1)
22;23:13,15;28:11;
17:19,20; 18:3, II,
.1
Unless (2)
73:15
40: 12;43: 14,22;
18;48:24;51: 13,14,
Zero (1)
62:6;109:9
voted (4)
55:23;56: 1,5;69:9, 15,
25;52:22
I 5:20
unprecedented
(1)
79:20,24;80:8,15
24;71 :23;77: 14,20;
worked
(1)
Zhang
(5)
6:15
vouched
(1)
83: 19;88:25;97: 17;
18:15
I 105:6,8,8,9; 107: 10
up (23)
84:10
99:25
working
(5)
1
2:7,8;5:9;6:5;9:3;
whole (11)
48:4,6,8;49:5;
I
W
10:20,24; 14:16,16;
6: I; 13:12;17:20;
51: 12
I
18:25;24: 16;47:25;
18:12;29: 10;43: 1;
works
(1)
1 (3)
51:2;65:3,22;73:5;
wait (1)
48: 14;50:7;71: 13;
10:1
I 76:21,23,24
77:3;84:24;85: 18;
103:24
89: 11;90:6
world
(2)
1.5 (1)
89:8;93:2;94:7;95: 10
walk (I)
Whose (1)
6:2;48:25
I 49:10
upon (1)
90:15
36:2
Worldwide
(1)
1:00 (1)
15:8
Wan (4)
willing (2)
49:4
I
103:20
use (3)
2:3; 17:24;59:4;
50: 18,22
worth
(1)
10 (1)
25:7;29:21 ;82:21
98:2
win (1)
24:14
I 18:21
used (12)
W-A-N (1)
73:13
wrap
(1)
100 (5)
8: 12;9:7;25: 19;
wishes (1)
98:3
73:5
135:17,18;36:8;
50:25;53:2;61 :6,9;
Wang
(21)
107:25
write
(2)
45:4;48: 13
81:4;85:5,6,6;96:4
5: 13, 13,21; 16:23;
withdraw
(1)
19:7,10
10019 (1)
useful (1)
17:5,19; 19:16,25;
64:6
writing
(2)
I 56:12
•
4:6
23: 18;25: 12;26:23;
withdrawal
(1)
71:12,15
101 (1)
using (2)
27: 10;28:22;29: 16;
108:16
written
(2)
I 26:22
6:10;24:7
30:3;33: 1;40: 16;
within
(2)
72:2;104:12
102 (I)
usually (1)
41 :20;46:20;47:24;
53:24;63:22
wrong
(I)
I 34:20
35:20
72:25
without
(21)
74:2
r-minute
(I)
Wang's
(2)
9:2;11:17;28:13;
wrongdoing
(1)
92:15
V
17:12;46:10
42: I;47: 10;48:21;
5:3
jl
(I)
wants
(I)
85:24;86:4;95:9;
38:13
X
various
(3)
105: 10
97:1;98:15,19;
j2 (I)
4:2; 12:23;89:7
waste (4)
103: 13;106: 17,24;
59:1
veil (14)
4:7;31: 15;98:5;
107:6,11,14,16;
X-ed (I)
r51
(1)
4: 14,15,24;5:7,7,9;
99:10
108:9,23
95:3
103:21
100:8,16,18,21;
wasting
(4)
witness (73)
13 (I)
y
102:20,25; 103: 12,15
44: 13,22;99: 12, 13
4:12,13,13,13;
34:
8
versus
(I)
way (8)
1
14:9; 16:23; 17:5,8,9,
J5 (I)
2:2
15:24;22: 12;29: 13;
16;19:21;23: 14;25:3,
Van (1)
32:19
via (2)
31 :9;50:20;95:23;
3,4,5,5,11 ;26:8, 16,
17:5
1
50(I)
1 | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM | | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------|\n| | Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 | | Page 125 |\n| | | | April 26, 2019 |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (14) unavailable - 150\n\n| Case 22-50073
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331
Pacific Alliance
Asia v.
Kwok Ho Wan | Doc 440-15 | Filed 05/25/22
of 126 | Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | Page 126
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019
April
26, 2019 | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--|\n| | | | | | |\n| 17:6
16 (3) | | | | | |\n| 49:14,24;50:11 | 5 | | | | |\n| 17 (2) | 57th (2) | | | | |\n| 9:24;19:24 | 17:6;56: 11 | | | | |\n| 19 (I) | | | | | |\n| 34:9 | 6 | | | | |\n| 2 | | | | | |\n| | 60 (I)
57:20 | | | | |\n| 2 (I) | 62012 (I) | | | | |\n| 41:2 | 3:17 | | | | |\n| 2.3 (I)
64:1 | 62013 (3) | | | | |\n| 2:00 (I) | 3:23,24;24: 17 | | | | |\n| 99:23 | 64 (I)
92:1 | | | | |\n| 2009 (3) | 65 (I) | | | | |\n| 18:21;48:6;51: 13 | 92:1 | | | | |\n| 2010 (I)
57:6 | 652077 (I) | | | | |\n| 2015 (10) | 2:1
66 (I) | | | | |\n| 41 :4,22;43:6;49:8; | 92:1 | | | | |\n| 51:11,14;58:4;59:10, | 67 (2) | | | | |\n| 11;75:18 | 21 :7;92: 1 | | | | |\n| 2016 (I)
20:1 | 6th (2) | | | | |\n| 2017 (7) | 63:4,5 | | | | |\n| 2:2;41 :24;43:7; | 7 | | | | |\n| 49: 14,22;71:2,3 | | | | | |\n| 2018 (3) | 7 (I) | | | | |\n| 18:18;51:22;78:21
21 (I) | 34:20 | | | | |\n| 41:4 | 77 (I) | | | | |\n| 22D (I) | 34:8
78 (2) | | | | |\n| 17:6 | 29: 19;31 :25 | | | | |\n| 23rd (2) | 781 (I) | | | | |\n| 49:8;51:14
29 (I) | 98:3 | | | | |\n| 78:21 | | | | | |\n| | 8 | | | | |\n| 3 | 81 (2) | | | | |\n| | 38: 12;39:25 | | | | |\n| 3 (I)
63:23 | 8G (I) | | | | |\n| 3117a2 (I) | 56:12 | | | | |\n| 9:6 | 9 | | | | |\n| 33 (3) | | | | | |\n| 69:8,12,21 | 9 (2) | | | | |\n| 34 (2)
23: 17;53:7 | 34:21;38:13 | | | | |\n| 340 (I) | | | | | |\n| 56:11 | | | | | |\n| 35 (2) | | | | | |\n| 71:22;72:1 | | | | | |\n| 4 | | | | | |\n| | | | | | |\n| 40 (I) | | | | | |\n| 57:10 | | | | | |\n| 43 (2) | | | | | |\n| 43: 19;46:24 | | | | | |\n| 45 (I) | | | | | |\n\n. \\_.\n\nMin-U-Scripl@ (15)16-9","body_zh":"证物 PAX 17\n\n2019年4月26日听证会庭审记录，PAX 诉 Kwok，Index. No. 652077/2017（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）），Dkt. 331\n\n22-50073\n\n关于：Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）\n\nPAX 17\n\n5/25/2022 全部采纳\nP.E.\n\n纽约州最高法院 纽约县——民事审判庭——第61庭\n-------------------------------------------------------x\nPACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA（太平洋联盟亚洲），\n原告，\n-诉-\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n被告。\n--------------------------------------------~----------X\nIndex No. 652077-2017\n60 Centre Street\n纽约州纽约市\n2019年4月26日\n\n审判长：\n尊敬的 BARRY R. OSTRAGER（巴里·R·奥斯特拉格）法官\n\n出庭人员：\nO'MELVENY & MYERS LLP（奥迈律师事务所）\n原告代理律师\n7 Times Square\nNew York, New York 10036\n代理律师：\nEDWARD MOSS（爱德华·莫斯），ESQ.\nSTUART SARNOFF（斯图尔特·萨尔诺夫），ESQ.\nGARO HOPLAMAZIAN（加罗·霍普拉马齐安），ESQ.\n\nHODGSON RUSS（霍奇森·拉斯律师事务所）\n被告代理律师\n605 Third Avenue, Suite 2300\nNew York, New York 10158\n代理律师：\nJILLIAN MARIE SEARLES（吉莉安·玛丽·瑟尔斯），ESQ.\nMARK A. HARMON（马克·A·哈蒙），ESQ.\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）\n官方法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331\nRECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 2 of 126\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 3 of 126\n\n庭审程序\n\n书记员：这是2017年第652071号索引案件，即 Pacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）一案。各位律师，请为记录注明出庭身份。\n\n法庭：好的。此前有人告诉我，你们今天上午需要一个小时进行布置，但幸好你们根本没花时间布置，所以我们开始吧。\n\n莫斯律师：是，法官阁下。谢谢。早上好。\n\n书记员：各位律师，请注明出庭身份。\n\n莫斯律师：早上好，法官阁下。我是来自 O'Melveny 的 Edward Moss（爱德华·莫斯），代理原告。\n\n萨尔诺夫律师：我是来自 O'Melveny 的 Stuart Sarnoff（斯图尔特·萨尔诺夫），代理原告。\n\n霍普拉马齐安律师：我是来自 O'Melveny 的 Garo Hoplamazian（加罗·霍普拉马齐安），代理原告。\n\n瑟尔斯律师：我是 Hodgson Russ 的 Jillian Searles（吉莉安·瑟尔斯），代理被告。\n\n哈蒙律师：早上好，法官阁下。我是 Hodgson Russ 的 Mark Harmon（马克·哈蒙）。\n\n法庭：欢迎。\n\n莫斯律师：谢谢，法官阁下。早上好。我知道，扣押问题已多次完成书面陈述，而且我知道法官阁下很熟悉，因此我会迅速讲完我的陈述。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 4 of 126\n\n庭审程序\n\n法庭：让我们在记录中载明双方当事人已约定的一切事项，并在记录中确定今天上午将审理的问题。\n\n莫斯律师：当然。这实际上就在我的开场陈述中，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：好。\n\n莫斯律师：但我会从此开始。\n\n（随后，向法庭展示了一份证物。）\n\n莫斯律师：法官阁下，我原本准备先回顾一下我们今天正在审理什么，并简要概述您将听取证言的四名证人。第一个问题是扣押标准，6201(2)。双方已就前三项要素达成约定：诉因；胜诉可能性；以及向被告主张的金额超过所有已知反诉，因此我们在此——扣押问题中的第一个问题是，根据6201(3)是否存在扣押依据；而根据6201(3)，我们须证明 Kwok 先生意图欺诈债权人，或在他多次试图使该公寓脱离我方可及范围的过程中妨碍本案中可能作出的判决，而此类尝试有很多次。\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\nCase 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 5 of 126\n\n庭审程序\n\n下一张幻灯片载有我们的证据，说明我们为何符合关于主观意图的法律标准。我认为让您方便查看这些内容会有用，但我不会在此耗费时间。\n\n这里列出的是我们的证据，以及我们今天将证明的证据。这是我们在书面陈述中重点列举的证据，我们将予以证明。我现在不会逐一讲解，但我认为除按证人分类外，按问题分类列出会有所帮助。我会按证人逐一说明。\n\n我们在此还要证明的第二个问题是揭开公司面纱。揭开公司面纱有两个要素：完全支配和控制，以及滥用公司形式。我认为对第一项不存在重大争议；第二项中，主观意图问题将是我们今天举证的重点。\n\n以下是支持我们证据符合该标准的判例。再次说明，这只是供您参考，法官阁下，以便您掌握这些内容。\n\n我只想就这两项标准，即揭开公司面纱标准和扣押标准，说明一点。二者均不要求我们证明欺诈。对于第一项，意图妨碍判决即已足够。对于第二项，判例指出，对我方当事人的不公平、不法行为或不当行为已足够。为明确起见，法官阁下，我们今天将证明欺诈。我的意思是，我们并不需要这样做。这是关于揭开公司面纱的证据，与我们在书面陈述中谈到的揭开公司面纱证据相同。这是我们今天将举证证明的揭开公司面纱证据，现在我将简要说明这四名证人及其今天将作何证言。Wang 女士将是第一位。Wang 女士是 Kwok 先生的翻译和助理。她的证言将证明，为规避扣押，Kwok 先生甚至教唆伪证。Wang 女士提交了一份宣誓书。这是 Kwok 先生反对我方先前扣押动议的主要证据。这正是他所依赖的材料，而她就自己绝对毫无了解的事实作了宣誓。毫无了解。我们今天将证明这一点。Wang 女士还将确认，Kwok 先生就两个关键问题未讲真话。第一，他对该公寓的质押；请记住，权利负担是 CPLR 标准的一部分。第二，出售的努力。我确信 Harmon 律师会说，世上还有什么能比这更公开；对吗？你把这套昂贵公寓投放市场。那么，如果他确实这样做了，为什么他否认收到还盘报价这一事实？\n\n庭审程序\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n接下来是 Ullman 先生。Ullman 先生是 Sherry-Netherland（谢里-内瑟兰酒店）的执行副总裁兼首席执行官。他将作证称，在审批过程中，Kwok 先生向 Sherry-Netherland 表明其在美国没有资产，也没有以其本人名义持有的资产。这在该酒店从未发生过。Ullman 先生还将作证称，使用两家有限责任公司，即一家境外有限责任公司叠加一家纽约有限责任公司，来购买该楼宇中的一套公寓——这正是 Kwok 先生所说他做过的事情——此前在该酒店也从未发生过；因此，Ullman 先生将说明，Sherry-Netherland 采取了前所未有的保障措施，例如有史以来最高的保证金，因为他们基于该结构非常担忧：如果 Kwok 先生未履行其每月义务，他们将不得不在全球各地追索他，而且他没有显示任何资产。\n\n我们谨称，我们的处境相似。我们将在此获得判决，并且出于同样原因，我们需要附加类似的保障措施。\n\nUllman 先生还将作证称，Kwok 先生试图将该公寓让与、转让给以其儿子名义设立的信托。Kwok 先生否认对此有任何记忆。保密和资产转移有助于我们符合该标准。既然 Kwok 先生否认这一点，我们便请 Ullman 先生在此就此作证，而且有书面证据。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\n庭审程序\n\n最后，Ullman 先生还将就 Kwok 先生及其代表向 Sherry-Netherland 就质押事项作出的虚假陈述作证。他们向您陈述该公寓已被质押。他们遇到了一个大问题，因为这违反了他们与 Sherry-Netherland 的租赁协议。因此，当 Sherry-Netherland 看到他们的文件并说：“嘿！你们质押了该公寓”时，他们说：“不，不。我们从未向 Ostrager 法官说过那样的话。您一定是误读了我们的文件。”这是虚假的。我们将证明这一点。\n\n接下来是 Horvitz 先生。Horvitz 先生将通过视频作简短证言。他是 Sherry-Netherland 的首席执行官兼董事会主席。他住在 Cleveland（克利夫兰）。我们两周前在那里对他进行了证言录取。他审阅了 Kwok 先生为诱使该酒店批准其申请而向 Sherry-Netherland 提供的财务信息，Horvitz 先生依赖该财务信息建议董事会予以批准。该信息包括 Kwok 先生称其拥有的两家公司的财务资料。\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017\nCase 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 9 of\n\n庭审程序\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n如您将看到的，法官阁下，我们向 Horvitz 先生出示了 Kwok 先生的证言录取证词，仅是公开可得的节选，其中 Kwok 先生否认对他曾向 Sherry-Netherland 声称其拥有的那些实体拥有任何所有权权益。他的证言直接与他向 Sherry-Netherland 所说的内容相矛盾；作为接收这些虚假陈述之人，Horvitz 先生将告诉您，Kwok 先生必定在向某人作虚假陈述。他要么在证言录取时撒谎，要么欺诈了 Sherry-Netherland。不存在第三种选择。而且，法官阁下，实际上使用“欺诈”一词的是 Horvitz 先生，而不是我。\n\n最后，我们将有 Kwok 先生。我们将证明 Kwok 先生支配并控制 Genever（吉尼弗）实体。我们将证明，他为击败扣押动议而多次向法庭作出重大虚假陈述；我们将证明，他为诱使 Sherry-Netherland 允许其购买而向其作出重大虚假陈述；并且我们将证明，用于购买该公寓的资金很可能来自一家空壳公司，该公司负责向我方当事人偿还由 Kwok 先生无条件担保的债务。这笔资金当然不是来自 Genever，后者是所谓的购买人。重要的是，法官阁下，我们\n\n将证明，郭先生不会且无法在没有扣押的情况下支付本案判决款。\n\n现在，我们已为开庭陈述准备了几段简短视频剪辑，合计约七分钟，内容为我希望播放的郭先生证言记录中的证词；根据 CPLR 3117 (a) (2)，我们有权这样做：“一方当事人的证言记录证词，可由在作证时具有相反利害关系的任何一方当事人用于任何目的。”阁下，这些是重要证词，具有重要目的：郭先生稍后会在这里——他现在就在这里——他会在公开法庭中表现得规规矩矩，但这并非他在证言记录中所发生的情况。阁下，郭先生闪烁其词，嘲弄该程序；我们准备了视频，并且有权展示，以便法庭能够看到我们在这里真正面对的是什么。\n\n纽约州判例法明确表明，在法庭程序中闪烁其词和作出不实陈述，是法庭可以考虑的一个因素；在看过这些之后，我认为法庭会同意，很难想象还有比这更有力、更直接且更重大的闪烁其词证据。\n\n郭先生自来到本国以来已提起约 17 起诉讼。他完全了解法律程序如何运作；在他作为原告时，他会予以配合，但当我们向他提问而他作为被告时，您需要看看他会怎么做。我们将播放这些片段。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记员，05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 11 页，共 126 页\n\n庭审记录\n\n这是第一段视频。我问郭先生——他告诉我他不通过电子邮件通信——于是我问，您是否检索过短信，以尝试回应我们在本案中的请求？以下是他对我的回答。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nMOSS 律师：我还试图向郭先生询问一些基本问题。对方提出了重大范围异议，他们不允许我就实体问题提出任何问题；因此，我试图了解他是否理解，我们在这里是为了讨论扣押问题。以下是我提出该问题时发生的情况。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nMOSS 律师：他们确实允许我询问的主题之一，是 Genever 实体，即郭先生为购买该公寓而设立的两个空壳实体。他拥有并控制这两个实体，并且他还是两个实体各自的公司代表；因此，如果他出于某种原因不了解他自己设立的实体——当然他了解，因为它们就是他，他就是它们——那么他有义务使自己了解相关情况。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记员，05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 12 页，共 126 页\n\n庭审记录\n\n有关这些事项；以下是我就这些主题向他提出简单问题时发生的情况。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nMOSS 律师：阁下，我们在书面陈述中曾简要讨论过——抱歉，我们在书面陈述中曾详细讨论过——律师指示郭先生在证言记录中不要回答显然相关的问题。标准在于他是否意图阻挠判决的执行。我问他，如果法庭作出判决，您会支付吗？他们指示他不要回答该问题。并没有任何协议规定不回答此类问题。这完全不适当。这对他们极为不利。他们极力阻止我今天向您播放该内容，因此为避免争议，我不会播放；但我认为您确实需要看到，在证言记录期间有许多次，郭先生即使没有任何指示——无论该指示是否适当——也自行拒绝回答。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nMOSS 律师：最后，阁下，最后一段，在此前的扣押动议中，我们引用了一段 YouTube 音频。那只是一段 YouTube 上的音频片段，带有说明文字，称那是郭先生的声音，而郭先生据称正在指示其同事迅速且悄悄地出售某些资产。他们在反对文件中猛烈攻击我们。他们严厉指责我们。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记员，05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 13 页，共 126 页\n\n庭审记录\n\n他们说，郭先生说 PAX（PAX）甚至不知道那是否是他的声音。他们不知道这是否真实。因此我想，也许可以在他的证言记录中问他。我播放了音频并问他：“嘿，那是你吗？”既然他们质疑真实性，我认为这是一个相当公平的问题。随后发生的情况如下。\n\n（播放录像。）\n\nMOSS 律师：谢谢您，阁下。我们期待今天陈述我们的案件。\n\nHARMON 律师：早上好，阁下。\n\n因此，您提出的第一个问题是，我们同意了什么、我们约定了什么；为明确起见，我们确实约定，就本动议而言，被告无需证明他们很可能在实体问题上胜诉。我们还就若干已向您以一本材料形式提交的证物作出了约定。有一些证物我们提出异议，但有一批证物我们已约定其真实、相关，并应被采纳为证据。\n\n我们还就各类庭审记录及庭审记录节选作出了约定；当然，对于庭审记录的宣读和证物，我们也存在分歧，听证期间可以处理这些问题。\n\n庭审记录\n\n但阁下，我没有多媒体演示。我没有将庭审记录或证言记录的证词剪辑成听起来效果良好的片段。我们已向您提交庭审记录：他们指定宣读的部分，以及为完整起见我们指定宣读的补充部分；我请求阁下在今天听证会结束后阅读这些内容，以了解完整语境。我认为最典型的例子之一就是您刚才看到的最后一段视频，他们说郭先生把手指塞进耳朵，拒绝谈论此事、拒绝回答问题；但如果您阅读完整回答，他实际上说的是：“我质疑其真实性。这不是真的。告诉我。向我证明这是我的声音。我不相信。不要给我播放别人的声音。”因此，这就是我对此所要说的全部内容。\n\n阁下，我相信我已仔细阅读了您关于希望在听证会上听取何种证据的告诫和说明。这是我们第三次就扣押动议来到阁下面前；我希望今天我们将会听取一些证据，在某个时点、以某种方式回答您就郭先生购买该公寓的意图、出售该公寓的努力、为何发生此事以及为何不再发生此事所提出的问题。我希望原告今天的陈述不会只是重复其已在两组动议中向您提交过两次的所有证据。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n庭审记录\n\n原告询问我们是否同意接受郭先生出席今天庭审的传票，我们说没有必要。郭先生将自愿出庭，并就您在证人席上向他提出、我们不反对且您不维持我们反对意见的任何问题作答；您可以直接从郭先生那里听到他为何购买该公寓，以及他对该公寓做了什么。阁下，如果原告不向郭先生提出这些问题，我会提出。\n\n郭先生不是美国公民。郭先生并非在美国成长。郭先生在中国、香港成长。他在此寻求免受中国政府迫害的庇护。他及其家人、其在中国的大家庭，一直是中国共产党政府广泛努力迫害、虐待和针对的对象，因为共产党政府不喜欢郭先生就中国腐败和自由所说的话。\n\n我们这里存在语言障碍。郭先生不会阅读英文，而经双方同意向您提交的一项证物，是购买 Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内特兰）公寓的买卖合同。该合同为英文。合同上没有郭先生的签名，因为他无法阅读英文。他不理解，或者说在来到本国时并不理解合作社所有权这一概念；他对所有权的理解，是基于其在中国从事多年房地产开发业务的经历。这就是他理解家庭和所有权概念的方式。\n\n您可以问他一个有关美国人如何看待所有权的问题，您可以将其翻译给他，并获得他的回答；该回答将以英文呈现，您就得到了一个绝佳的简短引语。但我请求阁下做的是，在郭先生作证时认识到，这里不仅存在语言问题，还存在文化问题；这些问题需要在郭先生所说和所做事情的语境中予以理解。\n\n我们没有在听证会前将证据开示问题提交给您，我也不认为现在是提出证据开示问题的适当时机。如果我们处理异议或文件提交的方式存在问题，我们本应在协商会议中处理，并就证据开示问题请法庭解决。我们没有这样做。\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 126\n\n庭审记录\n\n因此，我认为根据这次陈述，您今天将从原告处听到的内容，是对其已在两组动议中两次陈述过的一切内容的重复和重新引入。我希望今天不会这样做。我希望我们将看到一些真正的证据，以回应阁下提出的问题；我告诉您，阁下，如果原告不作为其案件的一部分提出这些问题，我将在有机会对郭先生进行交叉询问时向他提出。\n\n谢谢。\n\nMOSS 律师：阁下，我只想非常非常简短地回应几点。首先，就证据而言，您要求我们——\n\n法庭：我们应当直接进行证人作证。\n\nMOSS 律师：开始吧。很好。谢谢您，阁下。\n\n法庭：我们此前已经就动议进行了两次辩论。\n\nMOSS 律师：可以，阁下。我们传唤第一位证人，Yvette Wang（王燕平）。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记员，05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 18 页，共 126 页\n\nWang 代表原告—由 Moss 直接询问\n\n王燕平经书记员依法宣誓后，接受询问并作如下证言：\n\n书记员：请用响亮、清晰的声音陈述您的全名和地址。\n\n证人：我叫王燕平。我的地址是 22D\n\n东\n\n57th\n\nStreet，\n\n纽约，\n\n纽约州。\n\n书记员：谢谢。请坐。\n\n证人：谢谢，先生。\n\n法警：法官阁下，证人已宣誓。\n\nMoss（莫斯）先生：法官阁下，我有一份 Wang（王女士）女士的证词记录副本。我可以走近她并交给她吗？\n\n谢谢。\n\n（随后，一份文件交给了证人。）\n\n直接询问\n\n由 Moss（莫斯）先生进行：\n\n问：Wang（王女士）女士，您为 Kwok（郭先生）先生工作，对吗？\n\n答：我为整个家族工作。\n\n问：Kwok（郭先生）先生的家族？\n\n答：不，是 Guo Family（郭氏家族）。G-U-O。\n\n问：Kwok（郭先生）先生的姓名是什么？\n\n答：Kwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）。\n\n问：Guo，对吗？同一个 Guo，即姓氏？\n\n答：他是家族成员。他的名字是 Kwok，K-W-O-K。他的家族是 Guo，G-U-O。\n\n问：您是否否认您为 Kwok（郭先生）先生家族的企业工作？\n\n答：让我解释一下。Guo（郭）先生，Guo Family（郭氏家族），他的家族有一百多人，包括他的七个——我相信总共包括他本人——七个兄弟，而他们各自有不同的、比如说，家庭、小家庭。因此，合计而言，家族中有一百多人。这个家族中，不同的家族成员在家族企业中各有不同的分工。因此，我为整个家族工作。\n\n问：家族成员之一是 Kwok（郭先生）先生？\n\n答：是。他是家族成员之一。\n\n问：您为 Kwok（郭先生）先生家族在 Hong Kong（香港）的公司工作过，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：自 2018 年 2 月起，您为其家族在纽约的一家公司工作，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：那么，自 2009 年起，在过去 10 年中，除 Guo Family（郭氏家族）以外，您没有其他雇主，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：我想谈谈 Kwok（郭先生）先生出售该公寓的努力。直到最近，您知道 Kwok（郭先生）先生的经纪人是 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆），对吗？\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您代表 Kwok（郭先生）先生，与 Sloane（斯隆）女士就出售该公寓进行过讨论，对吗？\n\n答：让我更正一下。我是 Kwok（郭先生）先生与 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士之间的联系人，因为 Kwok（郭先生）先生完全不会读写英语，所以 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士经常联系我，请我向 Kwok（郭先生）先生转达她的信息；然后，因为 Kwok（郭先生）先生不会读写英语，我必须为他翻译，并将他的意思翻译成英语后发回给 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士。\n\n问：明白。谢谢您的澄清。\n\n答：谢谢。\n\n问：而且有时，您曾代表 Kwok（郭先生）先生就出售该公寓的努力与——Wang（王女士）女士，抱歉，是与 Sloane（斯隆）女士——交换电子邮件，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\nMoss（莫斯）先生：如果可以的话，法官阁下？\n\n（随后，一份文件交给了证人。）\n\n（随后，一份证物向法庭展示。）\n\nMoss（莫斯）先生：PX 17，已作为证据提交。\n\n问：Wang（王女士）女士，这是一封来自 Sloane（斯隆）女士的电子邮件，日期为 2016 年 11 月，对吗？\n\n2019/05/08 02:34 PM 纽约县书记员已归档 案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：2019/05/08 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期：05/25/22 录入日期：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 21 页，共\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n问：2016 年 11 月，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：有一个电子邮件地址，Yvette Wong，或者 Yvette.yue423 at GMail，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：那是您的电子邮件地址？\n\n答：那曾是我的电子邮件地址，但现在我无法登录，因为我的很多电子邮件地址都被 Chinese Communist Party（中国共产党）黑了，所以我不再有访问权限。抱歉。\n\n问：请原谅。我很抱歉，刚才差点打断您。当时，这是您的电子邮件地址？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：这些电子邮件是您发送和接收的吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：我想请您注意页面底部以“Dear Miles”开头的电子邮件。它写道：“我一直在认真考虑——姓名被隐去——某人为您位于 Sherry-Netherland（谢里-荷兰酒店）的公寓提出的报价。”您看到了吗？\n\n答：看到了。\n\n问：大约在这个时候，有人对该公寓提出了一项报价，对吗？\n\n答：从电子邮件来看，是的。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n问：嗯，您知道这一点。这封电子邮件唤起了您的记忆，即当时有一项 $60 million 的报价，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：上面写道：“我意识到，当你同意以……million 还价时，你已经作出了非常重大的让步；”对吗？我读得正确吗？\n\n答：这是 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士的电子邮件。\n\n问：对。那么，她所说的是 Kwok（郭先生）先生对该报价作出了还价，对吗？您知道这一点吗？\n\n答：我不知道这件事。\n\n问：您不知道 Kwok（郭先生）先生是否对该报价作出了还价？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：好的。她在顶部写道：“Dear Yvette, 请尽早将此内容读给 Miles。”您看到了吗？\n\n问：您看到了“Dear Yvette，请尽早将此内容读给 Miles”这一部分吗？\n\n答：哪一页？\n\n问：您看到“请尽早将此内容读给 Miles”这一部分了吗？\n\n答：是，我看到了。\n\n问：Miles 是 Kwok（郭先生）先生，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n问：您把它读给他听了，对吗？\n\n答：是，我读了。\n\n问：我想就这一点向法庭说得非常、非常清楚。Kwok（郭先生）先生知道这项 $60 million 的报价，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您对此毫无疑问，对吗？\n\n答：Kwok（郭先生）先生从 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士那里知道了这一点，而这就是我说我不知道的原因，因为这是我收集到或获得的信息，也就是说，要么是 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士告诉我的，要么是通过电子邮件告诉我的。然后我看到了电子邮件。我说，哦，好的，有一项报价，大概是这样。或者是 Kwok（郭先生）先生告诉我的。因此，当他们二人在那里讨论、收集或提到这一点时，这不是我的个人信息，而是我收集或获得的信息。所以这不是我的个人信息。当您问我，您知道吗——我只是这两个人之间的信使。我没有那种个人信息。我只是从 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士或 Kwok（郭先生）先生那里收集该信息。我只是一个信使。\n\n问：对。您向 Kwok（郭先生）先生转达了 Kathy Sloane（凯西·斯隆）女士告诉您的关于 $60 million 报价的信息。\n\n答：我转达了。\n\n问：对。而 Kwok（郭先生）先生知道该报价。\n\n2019/05/08 02:34 PM 纽约县书记员已归档 案号：652077/2017\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 文件 440-15 提交日期：05/25/22\n126 录入日期：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 24 页，共\nNYSCEF 收到日期：2019/05/08\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您知道您在本案中提交了一份宣誓书吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是代表 Kwok（郭先生）先生这样做的，对吗？\n\n答：我是代表 Golden Spring New York（纽约金泉）和 Guo Family（郭氏家族）这样做的，是的。\n\n问：嗯，您这样做是为了支持 Kwok（郭先生）先生反对我们扣押其公寓的动议。\n\n答：是。\n\n问：对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：让我们看一下该宣誓书。\n\n（随后，一份文件交给了证人。）\n\n（随后，一份证物向法庭展示。）\n\nMoss（莫斯）先生：这是 PX 34。\n\n问：Wang（王女士）女士，这是您的宣誓书，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：在本案中？\n\n答：是。\n\nMoss（莫斯）先生：法官阁下，它尚未作为证据提交。对方对此提出异议。我提出提交。它不是为证明其真实性而提交。\n\nSearles（瑟尔斯）女士：这份特定证物实际上有几个关键问题。其中一份附件，即其附件 C，受一项关于实体问题的约定约束，并且我们一直就质押问题进行讨论。法官阁下已明确，质押与是否可以扣押毫无关系；它只与优先顺位有关。我不反对他们将其用于弹劾。显然，这是一份已提交至法庭的诉状，但我认为它不适合作为证据被接纳。这是我所提出的问题。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：2019/05/08\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\nMoss（莫斯）先生：法官阁下，这听起来像是一个相关性异议，我认为法官阁下可以自行衡量其价值。显然，它已提交至法庭。关于质押这一问题，我们可以暂缓，因为我认为今天它会频繁出现。质押方面，6201(3) 规定，以妨碍判决执行的意图对资产设置负担。判例表明，质押是一种负担。他们将这个问题提交给您。他们说，我们已将其质押，所以你们不能扣押它。您驳回了该论点，因为那是一个优先顺位问题，但他们正试图曲解该规则，并称质押不在本案审理范围内，与本案无关。它载于 CPLR 中，而有关质押的虚假陈述直接指向欺诈意图，因此再相关不过。这是他们向她出示的证据。\n\n2019/05/08 02:34 PM 纽约县书记员已归档 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：2019/05/08 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期：05/25/22 录入日期：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 26 页，共 126\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n法庭：证人正在证人席上。您可以向证人提出任何您想向证人提出的问题。在证人先前作出与其今天在此作出的证词不一致的宣誓证词的范围内，您可以将该宣誓书用于弹劾目的，因此确实没有必要将该宣誓书作为证据提交，因为她就在这里。您可以问她任何您想问的问题。\n\n证人：谢谢。\n\n问：让我们看看该宣誓书，Wang（王女士）女士。\n\n答：好的。\n\n问：您提交该宣誓书，是为了支持反对扣押动议，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您明白这是一份法律文件吗？\n\n答：是，我明白。\n\n问：您明白它将被用于法律程序吗？\n\n答：是，我明白。\n\n问：您知道它将被提交至本院 Supreme Court（最高法院），交由 Justice Ostrager（奥斯特拉格法官）审理，对吗？\n\n答：是。我了解到这一点。我仍在学习。\n\n问：您明白这不只是随意的——\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\n2019/05/08 02:34 PM 纽约县书记员已归档 案号：652077/2017 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期：05/25/22 录入日期：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 27 页，共\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：2019/05/08\n\nWang（王女士）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n答：该宣誓书由律师起草，所以很多——\n\n2 就我所能看到的信息而言，因为我是 Golden Spring New York（纽约金泉）的管理人兼总裁、管理人，我知道我是文件或信息的收集人。我尝试收集文件、获取信息。因此，这里的所有这些信息都不属于我的个人所知，因为我没有参与这里的任何事情，所以我是在尝试帮助从不同的人那里收集信息和文件。\n\n10 问：Wang 女士（王女士），您向本院宣誓称 Kwok 先生（郭文贵）拥有该公寓；对吗？并且他通过另一实体拥有该公寓；对吗？\n\n13 SEARLES 女士：反对。诱导性提问。\n\n14 本院：驳回该反对意见。\n\n15 法庭法警：您可以回答。\n\n16 证人：我可以回答。好的。\n\n17 答：在这份宣誓书中，是的，我宣誓，是的。\n\n18 问：而且您不知道 Kwok 先生是否拥有该公寓；对吗？\n\n20 答：当您说我不知道时，我不明白，您是在说我的个人所知吗？我确实不知道，因为就个人而言，在购买该公寓时，或者之后发生的事情，尤其是在购买时，我不在美国，而且我没有参与、处理、沟通或谈判，也根本没有参加任何会议。所以我没有任何关于此事的个人所知。这一切都是在有人要求我之后，我必须开始询问别人；收集信息；从其他人那里收集信息。\n\nLisa A. Casey - 官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案号 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 29 页，共 126 页\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n4 MOSS 先生：让我们播放证言录像。\n\n5 （播放录像带。）\n\n6 问：您从未见过任何一份关于该公寓所有权的文件；对吗？\n\n8 答：自本案开始以来，我确实看过有关该所有权的文件。因此，律师请求我帮助查找文件。我确实看过一些文件。\n\n11 （随后，向本院出示了一份证物。）\n\n13 本院：听着，不用幻灯片，您要问她是否知道 Kwok 先生是否拥有该公寓。她要么知道，要么不知道。如果她说她不知道，而她此前宣誓称他确实拥有该公寓，那么您可以质证她。如果她说他不拥有该公寓，而她此前宣誓称他确实拥有该公寓，那么您可以质证她，但我们现在所做的只是引出她的证言。\n\n22 问：Wang 女士，您刚刚作证说，您不知道 Kwok 先生拥有该公寓，我现在要请您注意您宣誓书的第二段。\n\n25 SEARLES 女士：反对。这歪曲了她的证言。\n\nLisa A. Casey - 官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案号 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 30 页，共 126 页\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n本院：好的。听着，您知道 Kwok 先生是否拥有该公寓吗？回答是或否。\n\n证人：是，法官阁下。\n\n本院：那么他拥有该公寓吗？\n\n证人：我听说，仍然是我听说，他通过一个不同实体，而该不同实体拥有该公寓，而他拥有，类似于，该不同实体。这是我从全部文件中了解到的。\n\n本院：您没有个人所知——\n\n证人：没有。\n\n本院：——无论是哪一种情况？\n\n证人：没有，法官阁下。是的。\n\n本院：好的。继续。\n\n问：Wang 女士，我理解得对吗，您刚才说您确实看过关于该公寓所有权的文件？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：请看您的证言笔录，第 78 页。\n\n本院：我们不是这样做的。我们有大量动议文件。如果您要用证言笔录进行质证，您要说，您是否记得接受过询问，您是否记得被问到以下问题并作出以下回答，然后该内容进入记录；如果构成质证，我会注意到。如果无关紧要，我会忽略。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案号 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 31 页，共 126 页\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n3 问：Wang 女士，您是否记得我曾对您进行询问？\n\n4 答：是的。是您，先生。\n\n5 问：我要念一下：\n\n6 “问题：您认为谁是该公寓的所有人？\n\n8 “回答：我不知道，因为我从未在我面前见过任何文件，所以我不知道。这都是我从他那里听说的，但我不知道。”\n\n11 您是否记得被问到该问题并作出该回答？\n\n13 答：是的，我记得。\n\n14 问：您就该公寓所有权所作的任何陈述都只是猜测；对吗？\n\n15 答：我有个人信息；好吗？第二，当您对我进行询问时，先生，我非常紧张。我必须说，即使现在，我仍然非常紧张，因为这是我第一次坐在法官阁下和本院面前。让我解释一下，先生。所以，关于该公寓的所有信息，都是我收集的信息，我没有个人所知。因此，当您对我进行询问时，先生，我非常紧张，我的记忆不知怎么就变得一片空白，完全空白。非常重要的是，英语甚至不是我的第二语言。我的第一语言是普通话中文，所以我的第二外语是法语，而我正在学习英语，所以发生了很多语言障碍。\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n1 因此，当您对我进行询问时，先生，我非常紧张，而且我记得您给了我一些文件，像是这种我可以展示的文件，我很难在您面前阅读所有这些技术性、法律性、财务性的文件。因此，这就是为什么我非常紧张。\n\n9 此外，顺便说一下，我记得您在询问我时没有向我出示我的宣誓书；对吗？您没有向我出示这个，而您只是向我出示了这个（指示）。因此，当我拿到那些文件时，我的手在发抖。我尝试阅读所有文件，而且这些文件也是我从其他人那里收集的。因此，这就是为什么我尝试在非常有限的时间内给您一个回答。我不想浪费任何其他人的时间。所以，当我无法辨认，而且我不确定时，我就说我不知道。\n\n18 但基本上，在本案中，我只是——我是一个非常谨慎的人，只能够对我的个人所知负责。您知道，这些是我收集的信息、我收集的知识，或者只是经过我手的文件。我非常紧张，就像现在一样。我可能会说，先生，我不知道，我不记得。是的。这就是您询问我时的情况，先生。\n\n25 问：证言笔录第 78 页：\n\n案号：652077/2017\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 33 页，共 126 页\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n1 “问题：您认为他拥有它吗？\n\n2 “回答：我不知道。我不能猜测。”\n\n3 您是否记得被问到该问题并作出该回答？\n\n5 答：是的，先生。\n\n6 问：而且您知道，尽管我们在询问时问过您在证言询问中是否需要口译员，您的律师仍拒绝在证言询问时配备口译员；对吗？\n\n9 SEARLES 女士：不。反对。为澄清起见，我们并未拒绝。\n\n11 本院：好的。听着。\n\n12 SEARLES 女士：证人表示她不需要口译员。\n\n14 本院：你们双方提出的所有论点都已记录在详尽的认定中。我不想听任何论点。我只想听取证言，并希望以正常且迅速的方式引出证言。因此，在过去几分钟内我们所取得的一切就是，该证人表示她对该公寓的所有权没有个人所知。这就是她在证言询问中所作的证言，也是她现在在证人席上所作的证言。下一个问题。\n\n25 SEARLES 女士：谢谢，法官阁下。\n\nLisa A. Casey - 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n1 问：Wang 女士，您不知道，您完全不知道购买该公寓的钱来自哪里；对吗？\n\n3 答：我对此没有个人所知。\n\n4 问：从来没有人告诉过您；对吗？\n\n5 答：没有人告诉过我，但我听到过讨论，可能因为有人被要求尝试收集信息。\n\n9 问：您对购买该公寓根本没有任何了解，因为当时您在休假并住在北京；对吗？\n\n11 答：该公寓被购买时？我对购买该公寓没有个人所知，因为当时我在北京，是的。\n\n13 问：您不知道 Kwok 先生是否通过 Genever（吉尼维尔）拥有该公寓；对吗？\n\n15 答：本案发生后我了解到这一点。是的。\n\n16 问：您是在证言询问之后了解到的吗？\n\n17 答：不是。我是在本案发生时了解到的，包括证言询问，因为有人要求我为律师收集信息。\n\n19 问：“问题：您明白 Kwok 先生最终拥有该公寓，因为他拥有 Genever 吗？\n\n23 “回答：我不太清楚。”\n\n24 “问题：您不确定谁拥有 Genever？\n\n25 “回答：是。”\n\nLisa A. Casey - 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n1 您是否记得被问到这些问题并作出这些回答？\n\n3 HARMON 先生：法官阁下，如果 Moss 先生要从笔录中朗读，他能否先告诉我们他所读内容的页码和行号，以便我们能够跟上？\n\n7 本院：继续。\n\n8 MOSS 先生：我刚才是在读第 77 页第 13 至 19 行。\n\n10 问：您是否记得被问到这些问题并作出这些回答？\n\n12 答：是的，我记得。\n\n13 问：您不知道谁拥有 Genever；对吗？\n\n14 答：我对此没有个人所知。\n\n15 问：您不知道谁拥有 Genever New York（纽约吉尼维尔）或 Genever B.V.I.（英属维尔京群岛吉尼维尔）；对吗？\n\n17 答：我收集了该信息。大致是英属维尔京群岛公司拥有纽约 LLC 公司，而纽约 LLC 公司拥有该公寓。\n\n20 问：现在我要读您证言笔录第 102 页第 7 至 9 行：\n\n22 “问题：您不知道谁拥有 Genever New York 或 Genever B.V.I.。\n\n25 “回答：我不知道。”\n\nLisa A. Casey - 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang — 原告方 — Moss 直接询问\n\n1 您是否记得被问到该问题并作出该回答？\n\n2 答：是的，我记得，先生。当我说我不知道时，我的意思是我有个人信息，而且我不太确定，所以为了作出谨慎的回答，我宁愿说我不知道。\n\n6 问：即使您曾在向本院提交的宣誓书中对那些事情宣誓？\n\n8 答：先生，我们的理解不同。比如，我所理解的是个人信息，我说的是，我是一个谨慎的中国女性，所以，如果我没有该个人信息，或者我没有亲手参与、处理，我宁愿说我不知道。是的，我不想猜测。\n\n14 问：所以您在证言询问时很谨慎，但在法庭上作出同样陈述时却不谨慎？\n\n17 答：我是一个谨慎的人，先生，而且我将会是，我对我的个人所知和信息百分之百负责。当我只是收集信息、听到信息或听说某件事时，如果我不确定，通常我就说我不知道。是的。\n\n22 问：那么，如果您对宣誓书中的任何事情都没有个人所知，谁应对此负责？\n\n24 答：正确。我没有个人信息。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期：05/25/22 录入日期：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 37 页，共 126 页\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n1 您没有个人信息吗？\n2 是谁的宣誓书？\n答\n3 您的宣誓书？\n问\n4 哦。是我。本人。是的。\n答\n5 但您刚才告诉我，您对宣誓书中的事实没有个人\n问\n6 知情，而且在您没有个人知情时，您不承担\n7 责任；对吗？\n8 答 先生，我对我所宣誓的宣誓书负百分之百的责任。\n9 我理解这里的区别，\n10 所以——我非常感激获\n11 得这个机会来解释，因为对于\n12 我所说的、我接受您询问时所作的陈述——我正在接受您询问的内容，\n13 先生，以及我真正的意思，即我是否具有个人\n14 信息，存在理解上的差异，先生，\n15 另外——很抱歉我的语言表达。有时您\n16 盯着我看并问我那个问题时，我会非常紧张。即使是\n17 现在也是如此。\n18 很抱歉。我并不是想让您紧张。\n问\n19 对此很抱歉。\n答\n20 您甚至不知道存在两个独立的\n问\n21 Genever（Genever）实体；对吗？\n22 答 您的意思是个人知情，还是我收集到的\n23 信息？\n24 我的意思是，我在问您，您是否知道\n问\n25 是否存在两个独立的 Genever 实体？\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问 37\n\n1 答 我收集到的信息显示存在两个\n2 独立实体。\n3 您对 Genever Holdings LLC（Genever Holdings LLC）或 Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever Holdings Corporation）的资产\n问\n4 的任何质押均不具有个人知情；\n5 对吗？\n6 答 再次说明，我对此没有任何个人知情。\n7 这是我收集到的信息。我听说过此事。\n8 问 所以，您就您没有个人知情、只是听说并收集到的\n9 事实向法庭作出了宣誓陈述？\n10 这就是您的证词？\n11 \n12 答 我的证词是，信息有两种，\n13 一种是个人信息知情，另一种是收集到的\n14 信息知情。\n15 而且，您对该公寓的任何质押没有个人知情；\n问\n16 对吗？\n17 答 正确，先生。\n18 您不知道该公寓是否曾被质押；\n问\n19 对吗？\n20 答 我没有该个人信息。\n21 问 您从未与任何人讨论过质押该公寓一事；\n22 对吗？\n23 答 我本人没有讨论过此事。\n24 您从未与 Kwok 先生（郭文贵）讨论过任何质押事项；\n问\n25 对吗？\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n1 答 我可以问一下，您所说的“讨论”是什么意思？您是指\n2 询问、提及，还是讨论我们如何质押；已经解决了什么；\n3 策略计划是什么？我对您的\n4 问题感到困惑。您所说的“讨论”是什么意思？\n5 问 您是否曾与 Kwok 先生讨论过质押事项？\n6 答 我提到过，或者他向我提到过，我\n7 记不太清楚。只是，哦，存在一项质押。但我\n8 从未参与其中，例如，好的，坐下来告诉我\n9 发生了什么，细节是什么；我也从未参与其中，\n10 例如，好的，我去那里办理该项质押。\n11 我没有这样做。\n12 问 我将宣读您在证言记录第 81 页的内容，\n13 第 7 至 11 行：\n14 “您从未与 Kwok 先生讨论过\n15 质押事项？\n16 “回答：没有。”\n17 您是否记得被问到该问题并作出\n18 该回答？\n19 法庭：这与她刚才的证词并不矛盾。\n20 这与她刚才所说的完全一致。\n21 \n22 莫斯律师：法官阁下，她在证言记录中否认曾进行任何\n23 谈话，而她刚才说她确实进行过谈话。\n24 \n25 法庭：这不是我听到她所说的内容。\n\n39 Wang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n问 您是否曾与 Kwok 先生就该公寓的所有权进行过谈话？\n\n证人：没有，先生。我只是听说过。我问过他，他告诉了我，于是我知道，好的，情况是这样的。但我没有进行过例如五分钟、十分钟的讨论，或坐下来详细了解细节。因为我只是类似行政人员，为律师收集信息并为律师获取文件，所以我不了解背景，也不了解其中的逻辑。\n\n11 问 Kwok 先生是否曾告诉您，该公寓或\n12 Genever 曾被质押？\n答 抱歉，先生。问题是什么？\n问 Kwok 先生是否曾告诉您，该公寓或\n15 Genever 曾被质押？\n答 我相信不是他。\n问 是的。您认为不是他告诉您的？\n答 他向我提到过此事。\n问 Kwok 先生告诉您该公寓或 Genever 已被\n质押？\n答 我不记得是他第一次告诉我，还是我告诉他，因为我从其他人那里收集到了该信息。然后，大概是我告诉了他，他又向我提到了此事。\n25 问 在您的证言记录第 81 页：\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期：05/25/22 录入日期：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 41 页，共\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n“问题：您从未告诉 Kwok 先生 Genever 已被质押？\n“回答：没有。\n“问题：他从未告诉您其已被质押？\n“回答：没有。”\n问 您是否记得被问到这些问题并作出这些回答？\n答 正确，先生。\n问 如果可以，请翻到您宣誓书的附件 B。\n（随后，一份证物向法庭出示。）\n问 我想请您注意第一页。这是您附在宣誓书中的文件；对吗，Wang 女士？\n答 正确。\n问 这是为了支持您关于该公寓已被质押的陈述；对吗？\n答 看起来是的。\n问 我想请您注意第一页。您是否看到有一个收费编号，即 FBAKOY？\n答 抱歉。哪一页，先生？\n问 就在这里。这是附件 B 的第一页。您看到收费编号了吗？上面写着 FBAKOY？\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n第 40 页，共 125 页\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期：05/25/22 录入日期：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 42 页，共 126 页\n\n41 Wang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n1 答 是的。我看到了。\n2 问 质押是向 Roscalitar 2（Roscalitar 2）设定的？\n3 答 是的。\n4 问 质押日期是 May 21, 2015；对吗？\n5 答 正确。\n6 问 是否有人曾告诉您，或者您是否曾收集到\n7 8 9 10 11 12 13 该信息——\nSearles 律师（希尔斯）：异议。法官阁下，我很抱歉再次打断，但他一直从这份实际上尚未作为证据提交的文件中宣读。\n法庭：这是您证物册中的一份证物吗？\n14 15 16 莫斯律师：是。它在——它附在她的宣誓书中——在证物册中，也附在她的宣誓书中。这是他们的文件。\n问 Wang 女士，当您向法庭提交该文件并宣誓称该公寓自 May of 2015 起已被质押时，您是否知道——该质押实际上已于 March of 2017 终止？\n17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Searles 律师：但该文件尚未被接纳。它是我们对此存在争议的文件之一。\n法庭：好吧。请继续。\n问 在您提交宣誓书之前，您是否知道该公寓自 May of 2015 起已被质押，而该质押实际上已经终止？\n25 答 先生，让我再次说清楚。当您对我进行询问时，\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 您向我出示这份文件，却没有向我出示我的宣誓书。请记住，我签署的宣誓书是在大约一百年前——我是说一年前——而当您对我进行询问时，您只向我出示了证物，没有向我出示我的任何宣誓书，以及所有这些证物；而我只是从其他人那里收集这些文件的人。因此，我必须强调，作为 Golden Spring（Golden Spring）的行政人员，我每天都在为您、为我的律师以及为其他项目收集文件和信息，所以我收集的文件和信息很多。\n\n我无法记住哪一份文件对应什么，因此当您对我进行询问时，您向我出示的只是我数千页、数百万页其他文件中的一两页。我必须说，当我收集所有这些文件时，我之所以是收集这些文件的人，是因为我的同事要么被中国共产党绑架，要么因受到威胁而辞职；\n15 16 要么他们什么也没留下就离开了。\n17 因此，我处于一个非常无助的境地，只能帮助收集所有这些\n18 文件。\n19 \n20 21 22 而许多文件我只是放在我的档案中，我没有时间审阅，因此您在证言询问中向我出示文件，并询问我是否能够立刻凭记忆回想起来，告诉您这些文件是什么、解决了什么、其中有什么，这对我来说确实非常困难。\n23 24 25 所以，这实际上就像我全部档案中的两三张纸。\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n1 \n2 问 好的。所以我不是在谈论您的证言询问。\n3 我问您的问题是——这非常简单。让我再问一遍\n4 这个问题。当您提交这份文件，\n5 并宣誓称该公寓自 May of\n6 2015 起已被质押时，您是否知道该质押已于 March\n7 of 2017 终止，而且您宣誓称已被质押的\n8 公寓事实上已不再被质押？您是否知道？\n9 答 我没有个人信息、知情。\n10 问 在您向法庭宣誓称其已终止之前，您是否听说该质押已经终止？\n11 \n12 答 我不记得，先生。\n13 莫斯律师：法官阁下，可以吗？\n14 （随后，一份文件交给证人。）\n15 \n16 Harmon 律师（哈蒙）：法官阁下——\n17 Searles 律师：我们能知道他向她出示的是什么吗？\n18 \n19 莫斯律师：这是 PX 43。他们对该文件提出的是\n20 相关性异议，而非真实性异议，\n21 法官阁下。它在证物册中。\n22 （随后，一份证物向\n23 法庭出示。）\n24 Searles 律师：这与我先前就\n25 质押事项提出的相关性异议相同。\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n1 法官阁下，这与您在我们上一次口头辩论中所列明、\n2 您希望今天听取的事项无关。\n3 那是该公寓买卖的时间安排\n4 以及买卖。我认为，目前\n5 各方之间对以下事项不存在争议：\n6 该公寓曾一度存在质押，而目前\n7 该公寓不存在质押，因此我不知道\n8 我们为何继续讨论此事。如果质押不存在，\n9 它就不是实际的产权负担。\n10 莫斯律师：法官阁下，如果他们愿意\n11 约定，她宣誓称存在的质押在她提交\n12 宣誓书之前已经终止，我很乐意\n13 这样做，以避免浪费时间。\n14 Searles 律师：不。我不会对此作出约定，\n15 但我愿意约定，自她完成\n16 宣誓书以来，以及自我们进行口头辩论以来，经过了不知多少个月的判决前\n17 扣押证据开示后，\n18 该质押已被解除，\n19 我认为我们对此不存在任何分歧。\n20 法庭：这是一份表明\n21 该质押已被解除的文件。您对此不予争议。\n22 那么我们为什么要浪费时间？\n23 Searles 律师：这正是我的问题，为何\n24 我们还要继续讨论某些事情——\n25 法庭：我将您的陈述视为一项约定，\n\nWang（王）— 原告方 — 由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n即该质押已被解除，因此无需就该文件进行任何询问。\n\nSearles 律师：我只是想百分之百明确，并不是说我作出该陈述；目前不存在任何质押。该质押已被解除。\n\n他们从 DC 获得的文件与我们从 British Virgin Islands（英属维尔京群岛，B.V.I.）获得的文件之间存在不一致；在某一处，我们的文件日期与他们的文件相近，而且文件称该质押尚未解除。他们的文件则称已经解除。当时我们主张，英属维尔京群岛的文件才是适当的文件。我们是通过外部协助取得该文件的。并非我们自行取得。\n\n不过，截至目前，并不存在任何质押，且我们对此均无异议。因此，我想明确说明，部分文件以及质押的时间方面确有不一致，但该质押截至目前已解除数月，因此，我再次感到困惑，为何我们还要继续讨论此事；因为如果争议在于根据 CPLR 所称的权利负担，那么并不存在任何权利负担。\n\n法庭：这是一次为期一天的听证会。听证会现已进行了一个半小时，其中三分之一是律师之间的讨论，和／或对两套书面材料内容的重复。你们已约定该公寓上不存在现行有效的质押，因此我不知道这份特定文件与任何事情有何关联。\n\nWang（王女士）——代表原告——由 Moss（莫斯）直接询问\n\n她已约定不存在现行有效的质押。\n\nMoss 律师：法官阁下，我能否就相关性作出回应？\n\n法庭：可以。\n\nMoss 律师：Wang 女士在其宣誓书中向法庭宣称存在该质押，而在她作出宣誓书的一年前，该质押已被终止，因此，为在本程序中试图规避扣押而向法庭作出关于质押存在的虚假陈述，这直接涉及可信度。\n\n这直接涉及欺诈。\n\n法庭：好。那么——\n\nMoss 律师：我可以继续，法官阁下。如果这样更合适，我很乐意继续。\n\n问：Wang 女士，我理解您在提交宣誓书之前从未见过那份文件，对吗？就是您面前的那份文件？\n\n答：哪份文件？\n\n问：PX 43，您从未见过？\n\n答：即使现在，让我告诉您，我也不记得那份文件。\n\nWang——代表原告——由 Moss 直接询问\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\n答：是。而且，如蒙允许，我再重复一次，我是 Golden Spring（黄金泉）的行政管理人员。这不是我的选择。因为 Chinese Communist Party（中国共产党）几乎绑架了我与公司之间的所有同事。因此，就我的背景而言，我不具备金融专业知识。我不具备美国房地产专业知识。因此，当时我是唯一一个至少会说一点英语的人，并试图帮助这个家庭，所以才会如此。我的许多同事，要么被绑架，要么失踪，要么什么也没说就离开，把他们的东西放在我的桌上。我花了很长时间试图学习、理解并弄清那些东西是什么，而我不擅长阅读文件。即使现在，先生，您向我出示这个，我在这里非常紧张；如果您不指出“pledge（质押）”这个词所在的位置，我仍无法辨认出这是一份经我手处理过的文件。因为我的背景确实如此，我不是骗子，我从未伪造过任何东西，而我在这里是为了试图帮助、帮助本案。谢谢您，先生。\n\n问：谢谢。\n\nMoss 律师：目前没有进一步问题，法官阁下。\n\n交叉询问\n\n由 Searles（瑟尔斯）律师进行\n\n问：早上好，Wang 女士。我会尽量大声说话，以便您能听到我。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）——官方法庭记录员\n\nWang——代表原告——由 Searles 交叉询问\n\nSearles 律师：我只是想暂时退一步，以便让法官阁下更好地理解一件事。\n\n问：您最初何时开始为 Guo Family（郭氏家族）工作？\n\n答：我在北京时开始为郭氏家族工作。我从欧洲回来，大学毕业后回到北京，开始为郭氏家族工作。\n\n问：当您说郭氏家族时，您的意思是不仅指 Kwok 先生的直系亲属，对吗？\n\n答：对。我所了解的郭氏家族有一百多人，而 Miles Kwok（郭文贵）是整个家族的第七个儿子。他有多位哥哥，也有父母。他有侄女、侄子和嫂嫂；目前他的五哥和六哥仍在监狱中。他们被中国共产党逮捕并关进监狱。他的许多家庭成员，包括他的儿子、女儿、侄女、侄子、嫂嫂和兄弟，以及他的所有长期雇员，像我一样，直到现在都无缘无故地受到威胁、被绑架和关进监狱。\n\n问：您为之工作的这个郭氏家族，位于包括中国在内的世界多个地方，包括您刚才所说的那些人，对吗？\n\nLisa A. Casey——官方法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\nWang——代表原告——由 Searles 交叉询问\n\n答：对。他们住在中国、中国大陆，也住在例如香港、欧洲和美国。遍布世界各地。\n\n问：您何时搬到纽约，开始为郭氏家族工作？\n\n答：那是一个我永远不会忘记的日子。那是 April 23rd, 2015。我来到纽约和美国后，就再也无法回中国看望我的家人和儿子。当我离开中国时，我儿子 1.5 岁，即一岁五个月。现在他大概快六岁了，他将要上学。自 2017 年末起，我的家人、我的丈夫和我的儿子就停止与我交谈，至今已超过 16 个月，我没有收到他们的任何消息，也没有从他们那里收到任何东西。\n\n中国共产党伪造了我的很多东西。他们伪造了我的声音、我的录音、我的文件。他们伪造了我所有的个人信息。他们威胁我的丈夫。他们拘押我的丈夫，讯问我的丈夫。他们告诉我丈夫，我背叛了国家，背叛了家庭，抛弃了儿子和家庭，而我从未同意这种说法。因此，自 2017 年末起，我丈夫停止与我交谈；我的儿子也停止通过 WhatsApp、WeChat 和视频与我交谈和见我，至今已超过 16 个月。\n\n我来到这里有两个原因。第一，我是一个忠诚的人。我丈夫是我的第一个男朋友。我在法国上大学时认识他，我们一起学习。我们结婚了，我从未有过第二个男朋友。我根本从未有过第二个丈夫。我多次告诉他，我没有离开你。我只是处于一个我无法控制的处境。但是，中国共产党继续威胁他和他的整个家庭，并强迫我丈夫与我离婚。\n\n这是他们第三次试图这样做。上个月，我丈夫的律师通过我哥哥联系了我，因为我丈夫已超过大约 16 个月没有和我说话。我弟弟告诉我，姐姐，他们想和你离婚，他们需要你在中国出庭。我说，这不可能，因为中国共产党正在找我。我不能回中国。\n\n然后他们回来告诉我，姐姐，他们要你拿着护照录一段视频，并作出类似声明，说，好，我愿意与我丈夫离婚。我告诉我弟弟，事情不能这样办，因为中国共产党已经伪造了我的许多视频和声音。如果我曾录制这段视频，并在镜头前说我愿意与我丈夫离婚，有一天——我儿子现在六岁。他会长大，也会成年，而那段视频将会被中国共产党伪造并使用。\n\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 52 页，共 126 页\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\nWang——代表原告——由 Searles 交叉询问\n\n一遍又一遍，又一遍地用于那些话。我不能有一天让我儿子站在我面前问我，妈妈，是你放弃了我，抛弃了我。\n\n法庭：好了。够了。\n\n证人：对不起。\n\n法庭：这并非对该问题的回答。\n\n证人：对不起，对不起。对不起，对不起，法官阁下。\n\n问：好。我们稍微换个话题，好吗？那么，您说您自何时起一直在纽约市为郭氏家族工作？\n\n答：对。不。我自 2009 年起为郭氏家族工作，自 April 23rd, 2015 来到美国后，继续为郭氏家族以及 Kwok 先生本人工作。\n\n问：目前您是 Golden Spring New York（纽约黄金泉）的总裁，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Golden Spring New York 为郭氏家族做什么？\n\n答：自从我接手后，Golden Spring New York 才恢复运作，那是在 2018 年初。在此之前，Golden Spring New York 的员工要么离职，要么辞职，要么消失。因此，有很多遗留问题需要我处理；自从我开始为 Golden Spring New York 工作后，我将 Golden Spring New York 定义为郭氏家族的家族办公室，因此我开始收集一切并进行运营。\n\n纽约县书记员办公室已提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 索引编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 53 页，共 126 页\n\nWang——代表原告——由 Searles 交叉询问\n\n问：因此，在您的职责中，您收集文件并运营该实体？\n\n答：对。是的。\n\n问：作为郭氏家族的人员，您还有哪些其他职责？\n\n答：对不起。您的问题是什么？\n\n问：作为总裁，就 Golden Spring、郭氏家族而言，您还有哪些其他职责？\n\n答：其他职责包括，例如组建团队；以及，例如协助所有诉讼；协助收集文件和信息；以及协助进行日常运营，每一天。\n\n问：那么，当您说日常运营时，您的意思是确保每个人的账单按时支付，并确保其他所有人都知道他们应当做什么？\n\n答：对。因为我的许多前同事，如我所说，他们就这样消失了、离开了，所以有很多未解决的问题、账单和事项；当我进来开始为 Golden Spring 工作时，几乎一切都回到了正轨，我看得见这一点，我为此感到自豪。\n\n问：您今天上午已在此作了相当多的证言。\n\n53 Wang（王）—代表原告—由 Searles（瑟尔斯）交叉询问\n\n问：关于亲身知情这一概念，我认为您使用的术语是“收集得知的信息”。在您看来，这两者之间是否存在区别？\n\n法院：我理解其中的区别。\n\nSEARLES 女士：好的。如果您需要参考，我想您面前可能有该文件。这是证物 34，即尚未作为证据提交的宣誓书。\n\n问：在向法院提交该宣誓书之前，您是否收集了构成证物一部分的基础文件？\n\n答：是。所有证物均属于我收集的文件的一部分。\n\n问：在提交该宣誓书之前，您是否审阅、查看并阅读了这些文件？\n\n答：我没有审阅全部文件，因为第一，我收集了很多文件。第二，正如我所说，英语是我的第三语言，所以如果您听我说话，我的英语可能说得还不错，但当您让我阅读所有这些非常法律性或正式性的文件时，我无法很快理解它们，我必须查字典，并试图弄清楚它们在说什么。\n\n问：在提交您的宣誓书之前，您是否就这些文件与其他人，即 Golden Spring（黄金泉）或 Guo Family（郭氏家族）组织内的其他人，进行过交谈？\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员 126\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 55 页，共 126 页\n\nWang（王）—代表原告—由 Searles（瑟尔斯）交叉询问 54\n\n答：我从他们那里收集这些文件。\n\n问：那么，您与其他人就这些文件进行过交谈吗？\n\nMOSS 先生：异议。诱导性提问。\n\n答：是。\n\nSEARLES 女士：她不是我的证人。\n\n法院：她是一名不利证人。\n\n法院：听着，我的理解是，这名证人对任何事情均无亲身知情。她收集了大量信息，其中部分、大部分或全部是她所理解的；她签署的宣誓书，是基于她因语言问题而受到限制的理解，即律师放在她面前让她签署的内容。关于她的证言，我还需要知道其他什么吗？\n\n问：我只想请您看其中第一段，涉及亲身知情的问题。该段实际上并未说它是基于亲身知情，对吗？\n\n答：您的意思是——\n\n问：您宣誓书的第一段。\n\n答：第一段。\n\n问：该文件中不存在“基于我的亲身知情”这一表述；对吗？\n\n法院：好的。\n\n答：对。抱歉。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 56 页，共 126 页\n\nWang（王）—代表原告—由 Searles（瑟尔斯）交叉询问 55\n\n证人：抱歉。抱歉，法官阁下。\n\nSEARLES 女士：法官阁下，我现在转换话题，只是为了明确起见。\n\n问：本次听证中所涉的那套公寓是否已经出售？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：据您所知，它现在是否甚至已挂牌出售？\n\n答：对。我对此有亲身知情。\n\n问：这里所说的知情，是指它已经挂牌，还是尚未挂牌？\n\n答：它根本没有挂牌。\n\nSEARLES 女士：法官阁下，我想就这些。\n\nMOSS 先生：法官阁下，再问一个问题？\n\n法院：可以。\n\n重新直接询问\n\n由 MOSS 先生进行：\n\n问：该公寓何时撤出市场的？\n\n答：大约一个月。大约从现在起一个月前撤出市场。大约一个月前。\n\nMOSS 先生：我没有其他问题。\n\n法院：好的。您可以离开证人席。\n\n（随后，该证人获准离开证人席。）\n\n法院：下一位证人。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\nWang（王）—代表原告—由 Moss（莫斯）重新直接询问\n\n（随后，诉讼程序暂停。）\n\n法院：等证人到场后，请告知我。\n\n（随后，宣布休庭。）\n\n〔星号分隔〕\n\nMICHAEL ULLMAN（迈克尔·厄尔曼）经书记员正式宣誓后，接受询问并作如下证言：\n\n书记员：请以清晰响亮的声音陈述您的全名和地址。\n\n证人：Michael Ullman（迈克尔·厄尔曼），340 West 57th Street, apartment BG, New York, New York 10019。\n\n书记员：请坐。\n\n直接询问\n\n由 SARNOFF 先生进行：\n\n问：早上好，Ullman 先生。我们的进度有些落后，因此我将尽量加快进行。\n\n问：先生，您是否受雇工作？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：受雇于谁？\n\n答：The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）。\n\n问：您在那里担任何职？\n\n答：我的职务是执行副总裁、首席运营官。\n\n问：这实际上是否相当于——\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\nUllman（厄尔曼）—代表原告—由 Sarnoff（萨诺夫）直接询问 57\n\n答：是，是的。\n\n问：您担任该职位多久了？\n\n答：在 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）吗？\n\n问：是。\n\n答：九年。\n\n问：因此大约自 2010 起？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您从事酒店管理业务多久了？\n\n答：略超过 40 年。\n\n问：作为总经理，在您作为首席运营官兼总经理的新职务中，您是否参与购房申请流程？\n\n答：我参与整理文件，以确保在我将其送交董事会成员之前，所有文件均已齐备。\n\n问：在您任职 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）期间，您大约参与过多少宗公寓交易、销售？\n\n答：60 宗。\n\n问：The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）是否设有董事会？\n\n答：是，设有。\n\n问：是否设有一名 president 或 chairperson？\n\n答：设有一名 president。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 59 页，共\n\nUllman（厄尔曼）—代表原告—由 Sarnoff（萨诺夫）直接询问\n\n问：谁是 president？\n\n答：Michael Horvitz（迈克尔·霍维茨）。\n\n问：自 Kwok（郭文贵）先生于 2015 年购房以来，他是否一直担任 president？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：概括而言，Horvitz（霍维茨）先生的背景是什么？\n\n答：他曾任 Jones Day（众达律师事务所）的合伙人，担任律师。他是——Frick（弗里克）的受托人。他还是，我认为，Cleveland Clinic（克利夫兰诊所）的受托人，并曾担任 IMG International Management（IMG 国际管理公司）的董事长。\n\n问：The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）的董事会是否负责审查和批准公寓购买申请？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能否概括描述批准流程？\n\n答：可以。因此，有一名出售及购买经纪人，他们带来客户。该房产已挂牌。他们带来客户。他们就价格和条款达成一致。他们审阅董事会会议记录和楼宇状况。然后，他们来向我们索取申请材料，询问申请材料所需内容。他们整理该董事会申请材料，待全部整理完毕后，提交给我们。\n\n问：其中包括何种类型的信息？\n\n法院：我对此非常了解。我曾担任纽约市合作公寓的 president 多年。\n\nSARNOFF 先生：谨此记录。\n\n法院：我们可以跳过这一部分。\n\n问：您是否知道 Kwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）或 Miles Kwok（郭文贵）是谁？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：他是否曾申请购买 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）的一套公寓？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否记得大约是什么时候？\n\n答：是在 2015 年初。我相信是在 2015 年 2 月。\n\n问：Kwok（郭文贵）先生是否经历了通常的申请程序？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：他是否向董事会提供了财务信息？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否基本记得他提供了何种类型的财务信息？\n\n答：他第一次——他第一次提供的信息——我只是在后来才看到。该信息是保密的。它保存在一个文件夹中，我将其交给了董事会 president，但我相信那是以人民币计价的文件，而且主要是中文，因此那是第一份发送的文件。董事会就该文件开会审议，随后要求提供更详细的财务信息。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\n案卷编号 652077/2017\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 61 页，共\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\n\nUllman（厄尔曼）—代表原告—由 Sarnoff（萨诺夫）直接询问\n\n答：以美元计的财务信息。\n\n问：当您提交该申请信息时，您是否理解他声称拥有或控制该等信息？\n\nHARMON 先生：异议，法官阁下。其理解不具相关性。文件本身说明问题。它们均已作为证据提交。\n\n法院：异议成立。\n\n问：Kwok（郭文贵）先生是否向 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）出示了任何关于他声称在美国持有的资产的信息？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：他是否向 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）提供了任何他声称以自己名义持有的资产？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您是否记得任何其他 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）的潜在购买人，既未出示以其本人名义持有的资产，也未出示在美国持有的资产？\n\n答：没有。\n\nHARMON 先生：异议，法官阁下。\n\n问：那么，是否可以说——\n\n法院：存在异议。\n\n法院：那与任何事情有何相关性？\n\nSARNOFF 先生：其申请的独特性，以及 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）是否认为有必要——\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 62 页，共 126 页\n\nUllman（厄尔曼）—代表原告—由 Sarnoff（萨诺夫）直接询问\n\n法院：您可以询问他 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）做了什么，但他们批准了该购买。\n\nSARNOFF 先生：好的。\n\n问：除 Kwok（郭文贵）先生外，在您任职 The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）期间，是否有任何租户曾使用双层 LLC（有限责任公司）结构购买公寓？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：除 Kwok（郭文贵）先生外，是否有任何租户曾使用外国 LLC（有限责任公司）结构购买公寓？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：您刚才提到，他没有出示任何美国资产。因此，The Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰酒店）是否因而对其购买施加了任何特定条件或保障措施？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您是否记得那些保障措施是什么？\n\n答：是。有一笔保证金，覆盖五年期间的预计维护费。\n\n问：您是否记得保证金的金额是多少？\n\n答：约为 $3.3 million。\n\n问：您是否记得 Kwok（郭文贵）先生是否还被要求签署一份入住协议？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：他是否还被要求亲自保证——\n\n62 乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n问：是专有租赁合同吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：保证金的数额是如何确定的？\n\n答：该数额是在董事会开会时确定的，我相信实际上是——\n\n哈蒙先生：异议。证人没有亲身知情，他只是在说董事会做了什么。而且无关紧要，法官阁下。除非他是在就——作证。\n\n法庭：听着，不要吹毛求疵。我甚至不确定这些证词有何关联。继续。回答。\n\n答：当时是——我参加了董事会会议，我相信实际上在此之前，负责处理Kwok（郭文贵）先生购买事宜的律师事务所——我想是其中一家事务所——提出了该数额，我相信郭先生也提出了该数额，董事会讨论了适当的金额应为何数额；他们认为五年足以覆盖，因为在美国没有资产，如果郭先生不支付维护费，我们便有足够保障来保护自己。\n\n问：在转换话题之前，您是否记得有关郭先生申请和交割时间安排的任何情况？\n\n答：记得。\n\n问：郭先生是否对该程序施加了任何时间限制？\n\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 于 05/25/22 提交，于 05/26/22 15:30:37 录入，第 63 页，共 126 页\n\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 于 05/25/22 提交，于 05/26/22 15:30:37 录入，第 64 页，共\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：是。\n\n问：您能向我们说明一下吗？\n\n答：我相信是从二月开始，到3月6日必须完成。回看我的笔记，我认为交割必须在3月6日完成，否则他可以取消合同；我记得听说，我的理解是，出于风水原因，必须完成交割。\n\n问：这种时间安排——这种时间安排在Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-尼德兰）的申请中是否典型？\n\n哈蒙先生：异议，法官阁下。这与什么有关？\n\n法庭：这与任何事情都无关，但继续。它并不典型。好。下一个。\n\n问：是否有其他潜在买方要求在如此短的时间内完成交割？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：郭先生完成交割并入住后，是否有一段时间他寻求从其保证金中提取款项？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：您是否记得大约是什么时候？\n\n答：在交割后一年内。\n\n问：您是否大致记得，在您所说的$3.3 million保证金中，他想提取多少？\n\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 于 05/25/22 提交，于 05/26/22 15:30:37 录入，第 65 页，共 126 页\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：我相信大约是2.3 million。\n\n问：据您所知，Sherry-Netherland是否同意了该请求？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否有其他Sherry-Netherland公寓的买方在购买后不久寻求提取其保证金？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：是否有一段时间，郭先生或代表他行事的人，询问过转让该公寓所有权事宜？\n\n答：有。\n\n问：您记得哪些情况？\n\n答：我记得，首先是他的经纪人Kathy Sloane（凯茜·斯隆）找到我，问他们能否将该公寓转到他儿子Mileson Kwok（郭迈尔森）的名下。\n\n问：是转到他的名下，还是转入为其名下设立的信托？\n\n答：当时他们没有说是信托。他们只是说想转给迈尔森。\n\n问：迈尔森是郭先生的儿子，对吗？\n\n答：对。\n\n问：您何时得知该请求是转入为郭先生儿子设立的信托？\n\n答：是的，当我收到一名来自英格兰的律师——我相信是一位Mannis女士——来信，询问他们如何能够进行该转让时。\n\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 于 05/25/22 提交，于 05/26/22 15:30:37 录入，第 66 页，共 126 页\n\n65 乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n问：该请求是询问如何将所有权从郭先生转给郭先生的儿子？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：转入为郭先生儿子设立的信托？\n\n答：是。这是正确的。\n\n问：Sherry-Netherland是否回应了该请求？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：Sherry-Netherland如何回应？\n\n答：我们告诉他们可以如何办理，即他的儿子必须经过申请程序，并提供他在购买该公寓时所提供的一切文件，即郭先生当时所提供的一切文件；然后他们可以经过该程序。\n\n问：所以这是一个重新获得董事会批准的程序？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：这与董事会在此类情形下的标准做法一致？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：郭先生最终是否提交了转让申请？\n\n答：没有。\n\n问：他或其代表是否提出任何其他——\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n问：在之后的一段期间内，是否就该公寓提出过其他请求？\n\n答：据我记得，没有。\n\n问：那么，是否有一段时间郭先生询问过将其儿子作为联系人？\n\n答：有。\n\n哈蒙先生：异议。诱导性提问。他已经回答说没有提出其他请求。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\n哈蒙先生：诱导性提问。证人已经回答郭先生没有提出其他请求。现在他正在诱导证人给出不同答案。\n\n萨诺夫先生：如有需要，我可以向证人出示其证言笔录，以唤起他的记忆。\n\n哈蒙先生：证言笔录并非他所提问题的答案。\n\n答：我记得，他或其代表询问他们能否更换联系人，能否将其儿子作为联系人。\n\n问：这紧接在请求将所有权转给其儿子、转入为其儿子设立的信托之后，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n67 乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n法庭：您所说的联系人是什么意思？\n\n证人：对于该公寓，他们有联系人。他们有行政人员，如果我们需要与他们联系，我们应当通过这些人联系。有几名不同的人，然后他们询问是否可以更换为其儿子。\n\n法庭：好。\n\n问：您是否认为郭先生这样做可能试图实现什么目的？\n\n哈蒙先生：异议，法官阁下。他的看法同样无关紧要。\n\n法庭：我同意。异议成立。\n\n问：郭先生购买该公寓时，他和Genever是否与该楼宇签署了任何协议？\n\n答：除入住协议、保证金以及——入住、保证金和个人担保，这三份文件之外，还签署了专有租赁合同。\n\n问：Sherry-Netherland也签署了专有租赁合同？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：郭先生亲自签署了入住协议，对吗？\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n68 乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：我相信是正确的；是。\n\n问：那是与Sherry-Netherland订立的一项协议，该文件为英文，郭先生签署了该文件，对吗？\n\n答：正确。\n\n问：您是否记得专有租赁合同和入住协议规定了什么，以及您是否可以质押您的公寓？\n\n哈蒙先生：异议，法官阁下。关联性。郭先生的行为是否违反专有租赁合同并非本案争议事项。我不明白——\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\n哈蒙先生：是。\n\n法庭：郭先生以其本人名义购买了该公寓。\n\n哈蒙先生：是。\n\n法庭：他签署了专有租赁合同。\n\n哈蒙先生：是。\n\n法庭：他签署了入住协议。他签署了个人担保。Sherry-Netherland的规则是，您不得质押该公寓。郭先生质押了该公寓。您是否得知此事？\n\n证人：后来得知，是。\n\n法庭：好。\n\n问：您是如何得知的？\n\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331\nNYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 于 05/25/22 提交，于 05/26/22 15:30:37 录入，第 69 页，共 126 页\n\n案号：652077/2017\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案件 22-50073\n文件 440-15\n于 05/25/22 提交\n于 05/26/22 15:30:37 录入\n第 70 页，共\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n答：在我们收到O'Melveny（欧华律师事务所）送达的文件时，这是我们第一次得知此事；我们从中读到该公寓已被质押。\n\n问：您看到的文件，是郭先生签署、其律师也提交的文件，对吗？\n\n答：是。\n\n问：请您注意PX 33。\n\n（随后，向法庭展示了一份证据。）\n\n答：好。\n\n哈蒙先生：我的材料夹中没有PX。这是由贵所提供的？\n\n萨诺夫先生：那是你们的书面陈述。\n\n（随后，向证人递交了一份文件。）\n\n问：请您注意第四页。\n\n哈蒙先生：法官阁下，书面陈述尚未作为证据。他不能朗读一份尚未作为证据的文件，而且他不能认证这份文件。\n\n法庭：我没有33号证据。\n\n霍普拉马齐安先生：法官阁下，我们也有一份给您。\n\n（随后，向法庭递交了一份文件。）\n\n乌尔曼——代表原告——萨诺夫直接询问\n\n法庭：我们不就法律备忘录提问。继续。\n\n萨诺夫先生：好。\n\n问：您的理解是否是，在本案中，郭先生通过其书面陈述向法庭表示该公寓已被质押？\n\n哈蒙先生：异议，法官阁下。基于多项理由。\n\n法庭：异议成立。成立，成立。\n\n萨诺夫先生：我可以就此陈述吗？\n\n法庭：听着，我们已经确认郭先生购买了该公寓，并且其违反专有租赁合同质押了该公寓；我们也已经确认该证人在之后某个时间得知了此事，并且双方已约定，至少截至一个月前，该公寓已不再被质押。\n\n问：您是否通知郭先生，其公寓被质押违反了Sherry-Netherland协议？\n\n答：是。\n\n法庭：您何时这样做？\n\n证人：在我们发现其已被质押后不久。\n\n法庭：好。那是在何时？\n\n证人：我现在是在猜测，大约——\n\n丽莎·A·凯西——官方法庭书记员\n\n纽约县书记员提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号：652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收到：05/08/2019\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 于 05/25/22 提交，于 05/26/22 15:30:37 录入，第 72 页，共\n\n厄尔曼（Ullman）—代表原告—由萨诺夫（Sarnoff）直接询问。问：法庭：不要猜测。不要猜测。证人：——2017年年中。法庭：你的回答是2017年？证人：是。法庭：好的。你是否收到Kwok先生（郭文贵）或Kwok先生律师就该函作出的回复？答：是。问：他们是如何回复的？Harmon先生（哈蒙）：反对，法官阁下。如果是书面回复，则必须提交该文件，而且我认为整个——法庭：抱歉？Harmon先生：如果我们以书面形式回复，那么应当有该证物、该文件，而不是他的证言。我反对该文件，因为他就此事如何向Sherry-Netherland（谢里-内瑟兰）作出回复，与我们今天在此审理的事项毫无关联。Sarnoff先生：阁下，我将向您出示该证物。这是证物35。（随后，文件被递交给证人。）Harmon先生：法官阁下——Lisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）—正式法庭记录员\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由萨诺夫直接询问。问：Sarnoff先生：我想标记证物35。这是否是Sherry-Netherland，尤其是您，针对您致Sherry-Netherland、告知其该不当质押的函件所收到的书面回复副本？答：是。问：该函就是否——法庭：该函——Harmon先生：反对。法庭：你是否要将其作为证据提交？Sarnoff先生：是。法庭：好的。予以接纳。该函不言自明。Sarnoff先生：好的。问：你的理解是，Sherry-Netherland正被Kwok先生的律师告知——法庭：我会读。Harmon先生：反对。法庭：我会读这封信。Sarnoff先生：好的。可以。法庭：它已作为证据。Sarnoff先生：好的。你能否将Kwok先生律师向Sherry-Netherland作出的回复，与Kwok先生的书状及Wang（王）的宣誓书所采取的立场相协调？Lisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第74页，共\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由萨诺夫直接询问。法庭：反对成立。反对成立。Harmon先生：谢谢。问：我很快结束。你是否对Kwok先生怀有私怨？答：绝对没有。问：他不是起诉过你吗？答：是的。问：这是否对你的证言有任何影响？答：绝对没有。问：你今天来这里的目的是否是试图帮助PAX LP（PAX有限合伙企业）赢得其动议？答：不是。问：你是自愿来此作证，还是被传唤的？答：被传唤的。问：你的证言录取也是如此吗？答：是。问：你和我是否就你的证言事先沟通过？答：没有。问：你今天是否如实作证？答：是。问：让我看看能否概括一下你的证言。Lisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 案号 652077/2017\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第75页，共\nNYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由萨诺夫直接询问。简要地说。我还有一个最终问题想问你，请你告诉我是否有任何地方我说错了。你作证称，他没有显示任何美国资产或以其本人名义持有的资产；对吗？Harmon先生：反对，法官阁下。这只是在概括已经记录在案的证言。这是诱导性提问，而且——法庭：反对成立。我已经听过他的证言。Sarnoff先生：好的。法庭：我不需要对此作概括。你还有其他问题吗？问：你是否认为Kwok先生就其公寓的行为具有典型性？Harmon先生：反对。法庭：反对同样成立。问：你是否曾就Kwok先生可能试图通过该公寓实现何种目的形成看法？Harmon先生：反对。法庭：反对同样成立。谢谢你，Ullman先生。Sarnoff先生：我保留任何问题留待复直接询问。厄尔曼—代表原告。由Harmon交叉询问。\n\n交叉询问。由Harmon先生进行。问：下午好，Ullman先生。答：下午好。问：我是Mark Harmon（马克·哈蒙）。我们以前没有见过。我代表Kwok先生。Ullman先生，你是否会说Kwok先生的英语不是很好？答：我——是。问：特别是几年前不太好。现在可能已经有所改善，但当然——答：改善了很多。法警：请让问题问完。证人：是。问：……在签署出售该公寓的买卖合同时；正确吗？Lisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第77页，共126页\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由Harmon交叉询问。答：正确。问：本案原告向你提供了该命令的副本；正确吗？答：正确。问：因此，如果你作为Sherry-Netherland的执行副总裁兼首席运营官，知道Kwok先生或Genever（杰尼弗）已订立买卖合同，你会通知法庭吗？答：会。问：因为你希望遵守该命令？答：当然。问：好的。现在你还说，你被送达了文件，该等文件向你表明Kwok先生已在该公寓上设定质押；对吗？答：正确。问：Ullman先生，那些文件是否在要求Kwok先生发出通知的命令作出之前送达给你？答：我不知道该问题的答案。Harmon先生：法官阁下，这将作为被告证物。您希望我们从A开始，还是从被告证物1开始？我有这些文件，但只需要填写证物编号。法庭：证物1？Harmon先生：被告证物A还是1？尚未预先标记。Lisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第78页，共126页\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由Harmon交叉询问。Harmon先生：我只是询问法官阁下您对于我们如何——的偏好。法庭：你提交了证物册吗？Harmon先生：没有，法官阁下。我们有一本证物册，而这些仅用于交叉询问。这是——法庭：抱歉？Harmon先生：没有，法官阁下。法庭：好的。那么我需要一份该证物的副本。Harmon先生：我会交给您。法庭：交给法警。Harmon先生：我们将其定为被告证物A。（随后，文件被递交给法庭。）Harmon先生：法官阁下，我可以向证人递交一份副本吗？法庭：可以。Harmon先生：谢谢。（随后，文件被递交给证人。）问：Ullman先生，你已收到标记为供识别之用的被告证物A。你能告诉我们它是什么吗？答：这是我的助理发给Ira Gilbert（艾拉·吉尔伯特）的电子邮件，抄送给我，内容涉及——Lisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由Harmon交叉询问。答：抄送给我，内容涉及——问：好，不要告诉我它涉及什么。该电子邮件是否附有附件？答：是。问：该附件是否为一封由你签署的信函副本？答：这是我的签名。是。问：是以你作为Sherry-Netherland执行副总裁兼首席运营官的正式身份签署的；正确吗？答：是。Harmon先生：法官阁下，我将其作为被告证物A提交证据。法庭：好的。予以接纳。Sarnoff先生：不反对。问：现在，Ullman先生，你是否愿意查看该信函的第一和第二段？那是该证物的第二页。答：是。问：你是否看到，该公司于June 29, 2018收到该命令的副本？答：是。问：而大约在两个月前，原告向你提供了关于其与Kwok先生诉讼的文件副本；正确吗？Lisa A. Casey—正式法庭记录员\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由Harmon交叉询问。答：是。问：因此，我先前问题的答案是，你是否在该命令作出之前收到了有关该质押的信息，而答案是肯定的。答：是。问：而且你是从原告处收到的；正确吗？从本案原告处？答：是。问：我知道你就文件的汇集、收集作出了相当多的证言。我推定，你从Kwok先生处或代表Kwok先生收到的任何财务信息，都交给了董事会。答：正确。问：可以说，没有任何向你提供而你未交给董事会的信息；对吗？答：正确。问：然后董事会审查了该等信息？答：正确。问：然后董事会就是否接受Kwok先生成为Sherry-Netherland的公寓业主进行表决？答：正确。问：董事会第一次表决时认为该等信息不充分；对吗？\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 331 NYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019 案件 22-50073 文件 440-15 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第81页，共126页\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由Harmon交叉询问。答：正确。问：并要求提供补充信息？答：正确。问：后来提供了补充信息？答：正确。问：董事会收到了？答：是。问：董事会进行了表决？答：是。问：董事会批准了？答：是。问：董事会知道Kwok先生为批准所给予的期限有限；正确吗？答：是。问：而他们投票批准他成为租户？答：是。问：因此他们知道他没有美国资产；正确吗？答：是。问：他们知道他没有以本人名义持有的资产；正确吗？答：是。问：而他们批准他成为合作公寓业主？答：是。问：他们要求缴纳保证金？答：是。\n\n厄尔曼—代表原告—由Harmon交叉询问\n\n问：Kwok先生提供了保证金吗？\n答：是。\n\n问：截至今天，保证金中有多少已被用于支付其维护费？\n答：没有。\n\n问：Kwok先生购买该公寓的出让方，您是否知道该公寓是以何种形式持有的？您是否知道所有人是谁？\n答：知道。\n\n问：那么所有人是谁？\n答：是Gilbert Haroche（吉尔伯特·哈罗什），我相信该公寓由一家LLC持有。\n\n问：因此，该公寓是从通过一家LLC持有该公寓的人手中购买的；对吗？\n答：对。\n\n问：那么，Horvitz先生（霍维茨），他以何种身份拥有其公寓？我想，他不是通过一家LLC拥有该公寓吗？\n答：我一时不知道这个问题的答案。\n\n问：Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-内德兰）有许多人通过某个实体拥有其公寓；对吗？\n答：对。\n\n问：Sherry-Netherland知道Kwok先生是通过某个实体购买该公寓的；对吗？\n答：对。\n\n问：并且他们批准了？\nLisa A. Casey（莉萨·A·凯西）—官方法庭记录员\n\n1 乌尔曼 — 代表原告 — 哈蒙交叉询问 是。\n82\n2 问：现在，您说曾有一段时间，Kwok先生或代表他的人，询问过将该公寓转让给其儿子的事宜？\n3\n4\n5\n6 答：是。\n问：好的。那么那是一项询问，即，我们该如何办理；对吗？\n7\n8 答：对。\n9\n10 问：Sherry-Netherland就此作出了回应。您告诉Kwok先生，如果他想这样做，应当如何办理；对吗？\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17 答：对。\n问：而他没有这样做。\n答：对。\n问：所以最终没有任何结果？\n答：对。\n问：您还说，某个时候，Mileson，也就是Kwok先生的儿子，想成为联系人？\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 83 of 126\n\n19 答：对。\n\n20 问：现在的联系人是谁？\n\n21 答：我通常使用的联系人是Brenda Tsang（布伦达·曾），我想这是她的姓氏。\n\n23 问：不是Kwok先生？\n\n24 答：不是。\n问：因为Brenda英语说得很好；对吗？\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n84 乌尔曼 — 代表原告 — 哈蒙交叉询问\n1 答：是的。我当时在电话会议中。\n2\n3\n4 问：在那次董事会会议中，Horvitz先生是否就某人作了陈述，该人曾提供个人推荐以支持Kwok先生的申请？\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12 答：是。\n问：那是一名在台湾的建筑师？\n答：台湾或香港。我记不清了。\n问：是Horvitz先生认识的人？\n答：是。我相信是这样。\n问：而该人为Kwok先生作了担保？\n答：非常高度地担保。非常高度地担保。\n问：在为审批程序提交的其他文件中，有推荐信；对吗？\n13\n14\n15\n16 答：是，有。\n问：其中一封推荐信由英国前首相Tony Blair（托尼·布莱尔）提交；对吗？\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21 答：对。\n问：谢谢。\n哈蒙先生：我没有其他问题。\n22 再次直接询问\n23 萨诺夫先生询问：\n24\n25 问：Horvitz先生，我只有两个后续问题。\n答：不，我不是Horvitz先生。\nLisa A. Casey — 官方法庭记录员\n\n85 乌尔曼 — 代表原告 — 萨诺夫再次直接询问\n1\n2 问：不。乌尔曼先生。抱歉。\n法庭：我很抱歉？\n3\n4\n5\n6 萨诺夫先生：我说的是Horvitz先生。是我的错误。\n问：哈蒙先生问了您有关其他购买人是否使用LLC购买其公寓的问题。为明确起见，没有人使用双层LLC，也没有人使用外国LLC。这样说公平吗？\n7\n8 答：这样说公平。\n9\n10\n11 问：哈蒙先生问您，您是否了解，如果Kwok先生订立出售其公寓的合同，您会收到通知，Sherry-Netherland会收到通知；对吗？\n12\n13\n14 答：对。\n问：但是，如果Kwok先生转让作为最终所有人的外国LLC的所有权，Sherry-Netherland是否一定会收到通知？\n15\n16\n17 答：我们应当会收到通知。\n问：但按目前的结构，如果Kwok先生没有告诉你们，而自行进行该项交易，你们会收到通知吗？\n18\n19\n20 这不会是通过该大厦发生的事情；对吗？\n21\n22 答：对。\n23\n24\n25 法庭：我不明白。Sherry-Netherland的一套公寓未经Sherry-Netherland董事会批准不能转让；对吗。\nLisa A. Casey — 官方法庭记录员\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n126\n\nINDEX NO. 652077/2017\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\nCase 22-50073\nDoc 440-15\nFiled 05/25/22\nEntered 05/26/22 15:30:37\nPage 87 of\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n乌尔曼\n—\n代表原告\n—\n萨诺夫再次直接询问\n\n1 证人：对。\n2 法庭：因此，如果该公寓的所有人试图转让该公寓的所有权，\n3\n4\n5 未经Sherry-Netherland批准，该转让不能完成。\n6 证人：对。\n7 法庭：那么，对上一个问题的回答是什么？\n8\n9 证人：我——\n10 我可以吗？\n问：\n11 答：可以。请。\n12 问：所有权结构是，拥有该公寓的纽约LLC由一家B.V.I. LLC拥有，该B.V.I. LLC拥有该纽约公寓，拥有——\n13\n14\n15 而Kwok先生是最终受益所有人。\n16 我所问的是，如果Kwok先生将B.V.I. LLC的所有权转让给其他一方，\n17\n18 董事会不一定会知道。那不会涉及新的买卖协议，而且他可以将LLC的所有权转让给第三方，不再由他拥有，\n19\n20\n21 即使Sherry-Netherland董事会没有就该公寓订立新的买卖合同，也是如此。这就是——\n22\n23\n24 法庭：我认为那不是证人的证言。\n25\n\nLisa A. Casey — 官方法庭记录员\n\n乌尔曼\n—\n代表原告\n—\n萨诺夫再次直接询问\n\n1 哈蒙先生：不是。\n2 答：请回过头来再问我一次这个问题。\n3 问：如果纽约的LLC出售该房产，您会参与其中；对吗？\n4\n5 答：如果由Kwok先生控制的LLC出售该公寓，就会有一项买卖交易。对。\n6\n7 问：但是，如果该公寓并未涉及买卖，而是外国LLC参与一项交易，那不一定会引起您的注意；对吗？\n8\n9\n10 答：不会。\n11 法庭：但那不具有约束力。公寓不得转让。\n12\n13 证人：嗯，从法律上说——\n14 法庭：据您所知，在未经董事会批准的情况下，Sherry-Netherland的任何单元均不得转让给任何人。\n15\n16\n17 证人：对。\n18 哈蒙先生：我可以就此问几个问题吗？\n19\n20 法庭：我想我确实理解这一点。这并不复杂。请继续。问你的问题。\n21\n22\n23 哈蒙先生：谢谢。我会非常简短。\n24\n25 问：乌尔曼先生，当有人在Sherry-Netherland购买一套公寓时，他们会获发一张股票证书；\nLisa A. Casey — 官方法庭记录员\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 89 of 126\n\n88 乌尔曼 — 代表原告 — 萨诺夫再次直接询问\n1 Sherry-Netherland会向他们签发一张股票证书；\n2 对吗？\n3\n4 答：对。\n问：Sherry-Netherland保留关于该股票证书所有人是谁的记录？\n5\n6\n7 答：对。\n问：要将该股票证书转让至另一人名下、重新登记，Sherry-Netherland必须对此予以批准。\n8\n9\n10 答：对。\n11\n12\n13\n14 问：因此，如果有人向您出示一张登记在某人名下、后又转让给另一人的股票证书，Sherry-Netherland会拒绝该证书；对吗？\n15\n16 答：对。\n问：而且Sherry-Netherland不会向该人签发专有租约；对吗？\n17\n18\n19 答：对。\n问：因此，就您而言，Sherry-Netherland认为所有人是Genever（杰尼弗），Genever持有专有租约，这就是Sherry-Netherland的立场；对吗？\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25 答：对。\n哈蒙先生：谢谢。\n法庭：好的。下一位证人。\n（随后，证人被准许离开证人席。）\nLisa A. Casey — 官方法庭记录员\n诉讼程序\n\n1\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15 哈蒙先生：法官阁下，我不想抢话，但我认为下一位证人是播放Horvitz先生视频证言，也许我们可以节省一些时间，如果我们能够提交原告方和我方已标注了对各部分异议的笔录，法官阁下可以阅读该笔录，我们就不必再占用您的时间——\n法庭：不，不，不，不，不。我想在此时此地听取完整案件。\n哈蒙先生：好的。\n法庭：我不想再回头开始阅读文件和异议。\n哈蒙先生：没问题。\n16\n17 Searles女士（西尔斯）：我只是有一个澄清问题，因为我们之前没有谈过这个问题。\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24 之前。我们作出了指定和交叉指定，对某些选定部分提出了异议。我要问的是，您是否纳入了您未提出异议的交叉指定，作为此次视频展示的一部分。\nMoss先生（莫斯）：我们纳入了你们所有的交叉指定。\n25 Searles女士：好的。你们也纳入了你们所有的——\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017\nCase 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 91 of\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n\n诉讼程序\n\n1 都纳入了，不论任何一方是否提出异议？\n2 Moss先生：是。\n3 Searles女士：好的。\n4 Moss先生：是。你们交叉指定的所有内容都在这里，但限于——我们并未播放全部内容。\n5\n6\n7 法官阁下，这位是Michael Horvitz（迈克尔·霍维茨）。\n8 如您所听到的，Michael Horvitz是Sherry-Netherland的董事长兼总裁。\n9\n10 当Kwok先生向董事会申请购买该公寓时，他提交了财务资料。\n11\n12 Horvitz先生审阅了该财务资料，并基于该财务资料向董事会建议批准该购买。\n13\n14 首先，我只想梳理一下他的部分证言，因为我认为这会比视频更有效率，只是向您展示——\n15\n16\n17\n18 法庭：我只想听取证言。\n19 我不想要任何演示材料。关于此事，我已收到双方提交的两摞文件。\n20\n21 Moss先生：公平。\n22 法庭：这是一次证据听证会，因此只需提交证据。\n23\n24 Moss先生：好的。Horvitz先生的证言。\n25\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM\nCase 22-50073\nDoc 440-15\nFiled 05/25/22\nEntered 05/26/22 15:30:37\n126 INDEX NO. 652077/2017\nPage 92 of\nRECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\n诉讼程序 91\n1 （播放录像带。）\n2 Searles女士：抱歉打断一下。我有点难以——我以为您说所有指定和交叉指定都在其中，但这不是——你们不是按顺序播放吗？\n3\n4\n5\n6 Moss先生：不是。你们作出的所有反向指定，我们都已纳入，但限于我们并未播放全部的指定内容。那将需要45分钟。\n\nSearles女士：好的。\n11 Moss先生：这是一个选定片段，在我们播放了你们反向指定的内容的范围内，我们会播放你们的反向指定内容。\n\nSearles女士：好的。我遇到的唯一问题是，我指定了相当多的内容，而我无法弄清你们在这里播放的是哪一页。\n\nMoss先生：好的。\n\n18\n19 Searles女士：我的意思是，这显然是从当天的中途开始的。\n\n20\n21\n22 Moss先生：好的。我很乐意——页码和行号就在那儿。我很乐意给您——\n\n23\n24\n25 Searles女士：我看不到页码。我能看到行号。这可能就是我遇到的问题。\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019 126\n诉讼程序\n1 Moss先生：好的。是第64、65和67页。\n\n法庭：鉴于本案所涉律所的水平，我有些困惑。如果你们要出示一份证言笔录，你们就应当依次出示你们指定的全部内容，以及对方指定的全部内容。\n\nMoss先生：是。\n\n法庭：对于在证言笔录中提出的任何异议，我将裁定你们所出示的部分能否作为证据采纳。\n\nMoss先生：不完全是这样，法官阁下。我们双方都作了指定。播放我们所指定的全部内容可能需要一个小时。我们今天只播放所指定内容中一部分的10分钟片段，因为播放全部内容会花费太长时间。\n\nSarnoff先生：以及她所指定的全部内容。\n\nMoss先生：以及全部内容。\n\nHarmon先生：为什么没有提交笔录？\n\nSearles女士：我的理解是，他们打算提交其最初指定的全部内容。\n\nMoss先生：我们的理解是，所有已被指定的证言均已作为证据。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 94 of 126\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：听着，Horvitz先生在Sherry-Netherland（谢里-尼德兰酒店）；对吗？\n\nMoss先生：是。\n\n法庭：你们本可以让他到这里来；对吗？\n\nMoss先生：哦，不。他住在Cleveland（克利夫兰）。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\nMoss先生：他住在克利夫兰。他是董事会主席，但他长期居住于克利夫兰。\n\n法庭：好的。\n\nMoss先生：他无法出庭。\n\n法庭：所以他是州外证人。因此，你们是在播放他的证言笔录吗？\n\nMoss先生：正确。\n\n法庭：对于如何出示你们希望我审阅的证言笔录部分，你们是否已达成协议？\n\nMoss先生：嗯，我们的理解是，我们已经作出指定，法官阁下也持有这些指定内容，因此，在不存在异议的范围内，该等内容将作为证据。我们原本只打算播放一段——\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 95 of 126\n\n庭审记录\n\n今天播放其中一段选定内容，因为再次而言，播放全部内容需要一个小时。\n\n法庭：我只会审阅我在本庭看到的内容。\n\nMoss先生：好的。\n\n法庭：这是我的规则。那么，请继续。\n\nSearles女士：为免我再次起身打断，我想明确说明，我们对即将提交的部分证言提出多项关联性异议。您是否希望我——\n\n法庭：嗯，如果这些异议没有在证言笔录中提出——\n\nSearles女士：关联性不是证言笔录中的异议，所以——\n\n法庭：好的。请继续。\n\n（播放录像带。）\n\nHarmon先生：异议，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\nHarmon先生：我提出异议。他正在概述未提交给您的更多证言。\n\n法庭：驳回异议。\n\n（播放录像带。）\n\nHarmon先生：异议，法官阁下。关联性。\n\n法庭：驳回该异议。\n\n庭审记录\n\n（播放录像带。）\n\nHarmon先生：法官阁下，请原谅。法官阁下，在进行此事时，他们删除了在该证言过程中提出的形式异议，因此您看不到、也听不到这些异议。\n\n法庭：听着，我可能遗漏了什么。我刚刚听到上一名证人作证称，该公寓由Genever（Genever）所有，未经董事会批准，不能转让给Genever以外的任何人。因此，无论Kwok先生（郭文贵）是否在其他语境中编造了一个故事，或者Kwok先生是否在真假之间有所取舍，对于谁拥有这套公寓而言，都并不真正相关。\n\n（播放录像带。）\n\nMoss先生：我们的下一名证人是——\n\n法庭：对于该证言笔录，你们有交叉指定内容吗？\n\nSearles女士：有。我只想简要说明两点。首先，我在证言笔录中提出的异议已从录像中删去，因此至少有几项异议。\n\n法庭：好的。无论如何，我本来都会驳回所有异议。\n\nSearles女士：这没有问题。我只是想为记录起见说明这一点。\n\n庭审记录\n\n另一部分是，他表示这是指定内容和交叉指定内容。如您所注意到的，其中没有交叉指定内容，因为他使用的证言部分并不包括我们作出交叉指定的部分。因此，我们所有的交叉指定均出现在本证言的不同部分，但他是一名无法出庭的证人，所以我认为，从完整性的通常意义而言，这些并非交叉指定。我们只是指定了我们自己的部分。\n\n法庭：他大概可以出示你们希望从该证言笔录中出示的任何内容，作为交叉询问——\n\nSearles女士：对此我表示歉意——\n\nMoss先生：而且我们已提出这一做法。\n\n法庭：作为交叉询问。\n\nMoss先生：我们此前已提出这一做法。\n\nSearles女士：不，我表示歉意，因为当您表示这将会——\n\n法庭：我们不要争论谁对谁说了什么。如果你们希望播放该证言笔录的任何部分，你们有权这样做；如果有任何你们希望播放的证言笔录部分，他会乐意通过播放该等部分予以配合。\n\nSearles女士：好的。请给我一秒钟，法官阁下，因为如果没有原告指定的实际部分，其中一些内容将不会很有意义。您面前有，您有该——\n\nLisa A. Casey（Lisa A. Casey）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：我不会阅读任何未向我提交的内容。\n\nSearles女士：好的。我们就不再坚持了。谢谢您。\n\n法庭：好的。下一名证人。\n\nMoss先生：我们传唤Kwok先生。\n\n法庭：是否有Kwok先生的口译员？\n\n书记员：请官方法庭口译员登记出庭。\n\n口译员：普通话口译员，名字Tor，T-O-R，姓Huang，H-U-A-N-G。\n\n（随后，书记员依法为官方法庭普通话口译员宣誓。）\n\nKWOK HO WAN（郭文贵）经书记员依法宣誓后，在官方法庭普通话口译员协助下接受询问并作证如下。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 98 of 126\n\n书记员：您是否宣誓或确认，就法庭面前的所有事项如实陈述？\n\n证人：我确认属实。\n\n书记员：请陈述您的姓名和——\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 99 of 126\n\n庭审记录\n\n地址。\n\n证人：Kwok Ho Wan，K-W-O-K H-O W-A-N。这是我的名字，我住在Fifth Avenue（第五大道）。\n\n法警：请坐。\n\n法庭：好的。我不想浪费太多时间。举行本次听证会的原因，是为了让你们满足取得扣押令的举证责任，其中一项要件是，被告人意图欺诈其债权人、阻挠执行可能作出有利于原告的判决书，已转让、处分、设定负担或隐匿财产，或已将财产移出本州，或即将实施上述任何行为。因此，如果Sherry-Netherland的这套公寓未经Sherry-Netherland同意永远不得转让，而Sherry-Netherland已获通知，如有任何出售尝试，必须事先向你们发出通知，且未经法院批准不得转让，我认为我们不需要对Kwok先生进行冗长询问。\n\nMoss先生：嗯，法官阁下，鉴于这是我们今天第一次听到的新信息——\n\n法庭：抱歉。\n\nMoss先生：今天是第一次听到该情况。也许提前休庭用午餐较为合理，以便我重新梳理、修改我的提纲，并且鉴于这是您的看法，对Kwok先生进行的询问远少于我最初打算进行的询问。我很乐意现在开始，但我认为可以大幅压缩。\n\n法庭：好的。你们现在想休庭用午餐吗？这就是你的意思吗？\n\nMoss先生：我认为这对所有人而言或许较少浪费时间。\n\n法庭：好的。因为我不希望你浪费时间和客户的钱，也不希望你浪费我的时间。\n\nMoss先生：当然。\n\n法庭：两点钟回来见。可以吗？\n\nMoss先生：当然，可以，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：Paul，可以吗？\n\n书记员：可以。谢谢。\n\n法庭：好的。法庭记录员，可以吗？\n\n法庭记录员：可以。谢谢。\n\n法警：休庭至2:00 p.m.\n\n（随后休庭。）\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：好的。在本案中，原告是否拟就作为本案标的的保证继续进行？\n\nMoss先生：是，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：原告对于刺破公司面纱问题的立场是什么？\n\nMoss先生：嗯，按照法官阁下的要求，我们已修改起诉状，将Genever实体列入其中。\n\n法庭：抱歉？\n\nMoss先生：我们已修改起诉状，加入两家Genever实体；我们的立场是，我们在经修改的起诉状中主张的事实足以提出刺破公司面纱的请求。\n\n法庭：好的。但是你们并不拟在本次听证会上确立刺破公司面纱——\n\nMoss先生：是的，法官阁下，我们拟这样做。我们两者都拟进行。我们已如您建议的那样修改起诉状，而且正如我在开庭陈述中所述，刺破公司面纱是我们今天拟证明的事项之一。\n\nHarmon先生：法官阁下——\n\n法庭：关于被告，被告的立场是否是Kwok先生基于真实准确的信息购买了Sherry-Netherland的住所？\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案卷编号：652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号：331 NYSCEF 收讫：05/08/2019 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 102 of 126\n\n庭审记录\n\nHarmon先生：提交给Sherry-Netherland的信息？\n\n法庭：抱歉。\n\nHarmon先生：您是在问，被告的立场是否是提交给Sherry-Netherland的信息真实准确吗？\n\n法庭：是。\n\nHarmon先生：是。\n\n法庭：因此，你们还主张Kwok先生在其证言笔录中的证词真实准确？\n\nHarmon先生：是，法官阁下。在作出该证词时是这样。\n\n法庭：是，法官阁下。你们还主张，Kwok先生在本诉讼启动后无意中将该住所质押给另一实体，并且当他意识到自己无权转让、质押该住所时，他安排撤除了该质押。\n\nHarmon先生：我认为我无法按照您提问的方式回答您的问题。该质押已被撤除。我认为我无法回答——\n\n您问题的其余部分，但我确实希望向法官阁下说明清楚。\n\n庭审记录\n\n共126页\n\n法官阁下，原告刚刚修正了其起诉状。经修正的起诉状尚未形成争点。我们尚未开始就请求权的实体进行证据开示。一切均围绕扣押问题展开，因此，我假定——我在上一次口头辩论时也提出了这一点——一旦就是否应当扣押、或本院现有命令是否已为原告提供充分保护、以及原告是否符合扣押标准的问题得到处理，我们就将继续并开始就实体问题进行证据开示；迄今为止我们所进行的诉讼，只是关于原告是否已证明其有权获得扣押，而不涉及其他事项。对于本案实体，不会作出任何终局性事实认定或法律结论，因为我们目前只处理扣押问题。\n\n法庭：那么，如果原告证明可以揭开公司面纱，这难道不会对本院应考虑作出的命令产生某些影响吗？\n\nHARMON先生：简短的回答当然是会，但较长的回答是，我认为本院无须就是否原告已经证明可以揭开公司面纱作出终局认定，便可决定扣押是否适当。本阶段确定证明标准的标准，与作出终局认定的标准并不相同。因此，我认为，无论法官阁下就目前摆在您面前的问题作出何种裁定，都不构成本案实体问题的终局裁定；本案实体问题仍有待我们完成证据开示后处理。为明确起见，法官阁下，鉴于法官阁下阐述举行证据听证会理由的方式，我们并无意就揭开公司面纱问题展开深入细致的论述。我理解您可以在不作出终局认定的情况下批准扣押，但我们今天并未准备好提交关于揭开公司面纱的全部证据。\n\n法庭：好的。我们是否有口译员预计到达时间？\n\n书记员：没有。只知道是在下午约1:00订的，他们正从布朗克斯赶来。我在12:51 p.m.收到电子邮件时订的。\n\n法庭：好的。那么我们应当不必再等太久。\n\n让我从实际角度问一下原告——\n\n纽约县书记员备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF文件编号：331 NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019 案件22-50073 文件440-15 提交：05/25/22 录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第105页\n\n庭审记录\n\nMOSS先生：是，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：——如果作出纯属酌定的扣押令，你们的处境会如何更好？\n\nMOSS先生：比现有通知命令更好吗？法官阁下，是比较扣押令与通知命令之下的情况吗？这是问题吗？\n\n法庭：是。\n\nMOSS先生：我认为，通知命令的主要问题，或者主要问题之一，是根据通知命令，Kwok先生（郭文贵）——我手头就有——须在他已经就出售或转让该住宅签订合同后，立即向我们提供书面通知。因此，在那个时候，他已经同意将其出售给某人。即便Sherry-Netherland（谢里-内瑟兰）不予批准，该人也可能对该公寓享有权利主张。\n\n第二，该命令不适用于Genever（杰内维尔）的转让。如果Genever——我知道本院，我也理解，从实际角度看，如果Genever——该公寓之上有两个Genever实体。如果其中一个或两个被转让，那么该命令便不适用于此。Sherry-Netherland不会知道此事。事实上，在本案期间，该公寓——即Genever实体的资产，其中包括该公寓——已经被质押，而无人知晓。因此，如果该命令扩大至包括Genever实体的转让、质押、让与和出售，并要求在转让前作出通知，那就可以解决其中一个问题。另一个问题是张伟（Zhang Wei）的证词。该证词表明，Kwok先生称他并不拥有该公寓，而是由他人拥有，即张伟；是张伟将其质押，而且张伟显然可以就该公寓为所欲为。因此，所担心的是——\n\n法庭：不，不，不。该公寓的法定所有人是Genever有限责任公司，据我了解，该公司是一家由Kwok先生拥有的单一成员有限责任公司；对吗？\n\nMOSS先生：嗯，情况稍微——\n\n法庭：然后，该Genever实体继而由另一家Genever有限责任公司拥有。\n\nMOSS先生：Kwok先生拥有后者。\n\n法庭：Kwok先生是后者的唯一成员。\n\nMOSS先生：正确，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：那么，唯一能够转让该公寓所有权的实体，是持有产权的Genever实体；对吗？\n\nMOSS先生：应当是这样。\n\n纽约县书记员备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF文件编号：331 NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019 案件22-50073 文件440-15 提交：05/25/22 录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第107页，共126页\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：而拥有该公寓产权的Genever实体，只有经Sherry-Netherland董事会批准，才能转让该产权；对吗？\n\nMOSS先生：嗯，拥有该公寓的Genever实体，即纽约实体，受英属维尔京群岛实体控制。\n\n法庭：我明白这一切。但该公寓的产权登记在Genever实体名下。\n\nMOSS先生：是。\n\n法庭：该实体位于纽约，并在Sherry-Netherland的记录中列为该公寓的所有人。\n\nMOSS先生：正确，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：而该实体未经通知不得出售该公寓；对吗？\n\nMOSS先生：嗯，现行命令是——被告在该命令作出时，我们尚未修正起诉状，因此被告是Kwok先生——必须提供——\n\n法庭：好的。因此，最低限度，我必须修正先前命令，禁止Kwok先生、Genever New York（杰内维尔纽约公司）和Genever B.V.I.（杰内维尔英属维尔京群岛公司）在未向你们发出通知的情况下转让、让与或质押该公寓，本院将作出该命令，并将准备一份相应命令。\n\n庭审记录\n\nNYSCEF文件编号：331 NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019\n\n共126页\n\n现在，假定该命令在今天日落前录入，为什么你们还需要扣押令？假定如下所有事项：Kwok先生否认存在其对原告所负债务——并且这是在不对其中任何事项作出裁决的前提下——\n\nMOSS先生：当然，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：假定Kwok先生通过虚假陈述购买该住宅；假定某位神秘的中国政治犯张伟，W-E-I，控制Genever；假定在不作出裁决的情况下，Kwok先生在本诉讼启动后就可能向另一实体质押该住宅一事撒谎；假定在不作出裁决的情况下，Kwok先生在其证言录取中撒谎，称他从未试图将该住宅让与其儿子；并且假定在不作出裁决的情况下，Kwok先生的律师不当指示他不回答有关其出售该住宅意图的问题。\n\n你们如何受到不利影响？\n\nMOSS先生：除此之外——我认为我们不会受到不利影响，法官阁下。显然，我们更希望获得扣押令。这是一项财产权益。我们认为我们已经满足、并且能够满足举证责任，但如果法官阁下希望如此处理，您知道，我没有——\n\n纽约县书记员备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF文件编号：331 NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019 案件22-50073 文件440-15 提交：05/25/22 录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第109页，共126页\n\n庭审记录\n\n法庭：我尚未作出事实认定，但我将作出我刚才所说的那项命令，而这是否使我们无需继续处理其中任何问题？\n\nSARNOFF先生：我可以再问一个相关问题吗？那么，我们是否也可以假定，该动议暂时中止，并且我们可以在其中任何事项发生时再行提出？\n\n法庭：嗯，当然，在不妨碍你们在何时收到我刚才指出的三人或实体中任何一方拟出售、质押、让与或以其他方式转让该住宅的通知时，再次申请扣押令的前提下。\n\nSARNOFF先生：我认为在这些条件下，法官阁下，我们可以接受这样的命令，并接受目前中止或撤回我们的扣押动议。\n\n法庭：好的。现在，被告对其中任何事项有异议吗？\n\nHARMON先生：如果我认为那会解决问题，我很久以前就会提出，所以答案是否定的，我没有异议。不过，我确实希望明确，对再次申请扣押并不妨碍，并不意味着只要他们觉得合适，或者只要他们认为自己有更多证据，就可以再次申请。\n\n法庭：我不知道基于经修正起诉状，本案的证据开示将会揭示什么——\n\nHARMON先生：但是，法官阁下——\n\n法庭：——而且我不认为原告财力充裕到会跑回本院寻求扣押令，除非他们有比目前更充分的依据这样做。\n\nHARMON先生：我认为您会感到惊讶，而且我在上一次口头辩论中说过这一点。鉴于法官阁下在他们第一次申请中为他们设计的救济——那甚至是他们没有请求的救济——我不知道他们为何提出第二次申请。因此，我不理解第二次申请的必要性；如果有人曾对我们说，好吧，把这些实体也包括进去，我们会说没问题。这是一项禁令。我们会遵守禁令。因此，这就是我所说的，我只是希望明确，我们将从这里转向实体问题的证据开示，以便继续处理本案核心问题，而不仅仅是他们是否能够在其最终取得判决书时，就谢里公寓获得执行。\n\nLisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n纽约县书记员备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017 NYSCEF文件编号：331 NYSCEF收到：05/08/2019 案件22-50073 文件440-15 提交：05/25/22 录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第111页，共126页\n\n法庭：但他们没有判决书。\n\nHARMON先生：正是如此。\n\n法庭：好的。为使事情更简单，并避免任何扣押申请，我将录入的命令还将要求被告在Genever New York或Genever B.V.I.希望出售或转让其任何资产时发出通知。因此，B.V.I.不能出售——抱歉，Genever B.V.I.不能在未发出通知的情况下将Genever New York出售给另一家有限责任公司。\n\nHARMON先生：没问题。\n\nSARNOFF先生：也不能将其质押。\n\n法庭：并且也不能将其质押。是的。对吗？那么我们结束了吗？\n\nMOSS先生：我想是的。\n\nSARNOFF先生：是，法官阁下。谢谢。\n\nMOSS先生：谢谢。\n\n法庭：好的。祝各位下午愉快，周末愉快。\n\nMOSS先生：您也是。谢谢。\n\n＊＊＊＊＊＊\n\n兹证明上述案件记录真实、准确。\n\n高级法庭记录员 Lisa A. Casey（丽莎·A·凯西）— 官方法庭记录员\n\n案件22-50073 文件440-15\n\nAsia 诉 纽约县书记员备案：05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n\n提交：05/25/22 录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第112页\n\nNYSCEF收到：05/08/2019\n\nPacific Alliance（太平洋联盟）\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） 126 之 2019 年 4 月\n26 日\nI\n地址\n(10) 58:18;67:14 18,22;39:2,11,14,19; 4 月 (2)\n17:4,6;20:3,6,7,8, 同意\n(3) 40:18;41:21;43:5,7;\n$ I 49:7;51:\n\n12;56:10;70:10;98:I 12:14;21:6;I04:15 44:4,6,7;46:3;55:4, 建筑师\n(I)\n$3.3 (2) 地址\n(I) 协议\n(12) 18;56:12;57:17;I 84:6\n61:21;63:24 16:8 7:11;11:11;45:16;58:12;59:7;61\n:7,10; 争辩\n(I)\n$60 (3) 充分\n(3) 61:23;67:17,25;68:2,64:6,11,15;65:15;71-13 I\nI\n62:18,20;102:9 7,18;70:19;86:19;66:1;67:3,15;68:8,14,-\n已争辩\n(2)\n21:2;22:4,23\n延期\n(I) 93:20 21,21;69:2;70:6,12,I\n16:21;45:12\nA 99:23 协议\n(I) 13,17,18;74:\n15,19; 论证\n(6)\n行政\n(I) 67:16 75:25;76:\n13;79:21;I 24:21;44:2,16;\n放弃\n(2) 67:4\n- 向前\n(7) 81:7,7,13,14,17,17,:\n45:21;102:6;109:12\n49:21;51:3 管理员\n(5) 29:15;34:7;62:\n12;20,23;82:4;83:2; 论证\n(2)\n27:3,4;39:7;42:6;63:14;66:17;87:21;85:5,12,23;86:2,3,13,\n遵守 (I) I 32:14,16\n109:19 47:1 94:6 14,23;87:6,7,12,25; 周围\n(4)\n能力\n(I) 可采纳\n(I) 类似 (I) 90:11;95:7,13;98:\n14;20:23;48:25;55:\n19;\n96:10 26:20 56:25 104:16,21,24;\n105:I,70:25\n已承认\n(3) Alliance（联盟）\n(I) 8,10,13,23;\n106:3,7,I\n安排\n(I)\n能够 (5) 12:22;24:\n10;41:17\n31:19;49:8;72:23;2:2 10,14,17,24;\n109:24 I 101:21\n93:19;109:24 告诫\n(I) 允许 (3) 公寓的\n(2) 已逮捕\n(I)\n缺席\n(I) 13:19 8:20;66:17;75:13 30:14;98:25 I 48:17\n87:14 成年人\n(I) 几乎\n(3) 道歉\n(3) 到达\n(I)\n50:24 20:11;47:3;52:23 41:9;96:13,17 I\n103:18\n绝对地\n(4) 提前\n(3) 沿着 (3)\n5:20;73:7,11;76:10 显然\n(I) Asia（亚洲） (I)\n滥用\n(2) 73:20;96:\n16;98:18 34:6;56:\n17;108:2 105:9 I 2:2\n4:16;14:21 不利的\n(I) 积累\n(I) 出现\n(2) 旁边 (I)\n同意 (I) 54:6 79:10 14:8;50:13 I 102:7\n不利地\n(I) 惊人的\n(I) 出庭\n(I) 主张\n(2)\n64:2 9:8\n接受 (2) 58:15 97:13 I 92:9;94:\nII\n14:6;79:21 建议\n(I) 可接受的\n(I) 出庭情况\n(2) 资产 (2)\n可接受的\n(3) 76:7 108:15 2:4,11 I 7:2;24:17\n99:16,18,20 建议\n(I) 修订\n(I) 申请\n(13) 资产 (16)\n72:4 106:22 7:22;57:\n12;59:13;I 6:8,9,20;\nII:25;\n查阅 (I) 宣誓书\n(41) 已修订\n(8)\n20:9 60:2,24;62:22;65:\n13,,37:3;60:10,14,17,18;\n便利\n(I) 5:17;23:2,12,18;100:10,13,15,20;23;83:23;84:4;61:13;62:19;74:3,3;\n96:22 25:8,9,12,14;26:20,102:1,2;106:20;109:13,15,17 80:17,19;104:25\nI\n完成\n(2) 23,25;27:\n1,17;28:24;109:4 申请\n(2) 指派 (3)\n31:10;35:7,23,25;America（美国）\n(2) 58:12;63:10\n67:11;74:19 I 6:25;107:15;\n已完成\n(2) 36:2,3,6,8;40:11,16;49:4;51:\n14 已适用\n(2) 108:13\nI\n32:19;86:4 41:15,15,23;42:1,2;American（美国人）\n(2) 59:6;90:10 ~已指派\n(I)\n准确的\n(3) 44:12,16;46:10,12,14:15;47:5 适用\n(2) I 98:11\n101:3,9,13 21;53:7,9,15,25;Americans（美国人）\n(I) 104:18,23 指派\n(I)\n54:10,20;73:I 15:12 方法\n(I)\n横跨 (I) I 106:23\n6:19 宣誓书\n(I) 在……之中\n(2) 17:12 ~指派\n(I)\n行为 (2) 42:4 52:4;84:12 接近\n(I) I 104:13\n3:25;64:10 确认\n(I) 金额\n(4) 64:15 指派\n(I)\n诉讼 (4) 97:22 3:20;61:19;62:17; 适当的\n(2) I 105:4\n下午\n(3) 79:9 45:12;103:1 协助\n(I)\n3:19;68:11;100:2,4 75:3,4;103:20 和/或 (I)\n行为\n(I) 批准\n(II) I 97:20\n68:10 此后\n(2) 46:1 6:7;7:23;58:14; ~助理\n(2)\n行为 (I) 27:23;59:20 回答\n(3) 65:17;84:13;85:24; I 5:14;77:25\n98:14 再次 (IS) 10:8;66:6,10 86:4;87:\n15;95:9; 关联方\n(I)\n实际的\n(2) 4:21;26:8;37:6; 任何更多\n(I) 98:19;I06:4 I 11:24\n41:9,25;43:4;45:20;43:8 批准\n(6)\n44:9;97:\n1 假定\n(I)\n实际上\n(9) 47:I;51:1,1,I;67:13; 公寓\n(129) 7:21;80:13,15;I 108:6\n3:8;8:12;23:25;87:2;94:2,8 4:2;5:23;6:2,12,25;88:9;90:\n13;104:17 假定\n(9)\n41:I0,23;43:8;54:17; 对抗\n(2) 7:9,13;8:21;\n10:20; 已批准\n(5) 102:6;\nI07:2,4,6,8,\n104:16;109:24 14:2,3,11,12;15:3;\n62:5,14 61:3;80:10,22;9,11,14,16\n\n增加 (2) 之前 (7) 18:25;19:4,17;20:20,81:25;83:24 庇护\n(I)\n100:10,14 7:19;42:3;55:20;24;23:8;27:11,18,22; 批准\n(I) 114:17\n28:7,15,17,18,19,23;58:12 ~附上\n(2)\n61:12;70:16;75:10;\n补充\n(I)\n4:12 108:22 29:4,6,9,17;30:7,17; 大约\n(4) I 23:8;24:21\n额外的\n(2) 同意 (5) 32:21;33:2,9,10,\n12,61:21;63:21;64:1; 已附上\n(3)\n80:2,4 9:21;14:5;49:21;13,21;34:19;37:16,78:23 I 6:23;40:\n15;41:15\n\nMin-U-Script@\n\n(I) $3.3 - 已附上\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记员）05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 案号 22-50073\nPacific Alliance（太平洋联盟）\nAsia（亚洲）诉 文件 440-15\n提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 113 页\nNYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） 126 之 2019 年 4 月 26 日\n\n附件\n(34) 54:11,18,22;90:14; 董事会的\n(I) 购买 (I) I 8:24;75:II\n2:25;3:17,22,23; 109:4 65:19 87:25 证书\n(4)\n4:24;5:15,18;8:18; 基本的 (I) 书 (6) BVI（英属维尔京群岛）(8) I 88:1,5,7,12\n9:2;10:14;11:21; 10:II 12:19;41:13,14; 34:16,17,23;45:9, 主席\n(2)\n13:21;24:6;25:15; 基本上\n(2) 69:12;77:3,5 12;86:13,17;106:23 I 58:10;90:8\n44:18;46:15;78:3,5; 31:18;59:17 双方 (6) 主席\n(I)\n98:8;102:5,8,11,14, 依据 (2) 10:22;22:13;60:17; C I 57:24\n17;I03:1,13;104:4,7; 101:2;109:10 92:13;100:20;I04:22 质疑\n(2)\n107:3,22;108:10,17, 开始\n(I) 底部\n(I)\n, 呼叫 (4) I 13:13;14:21\n24;109:9 63:3 20:17 16:22;66:19;84:I; 改变\n(3)\n企图\n(I) 开始\n(I) 购买\n(I) 97:9 I 51:10;66:20;67:7\n98:18\n企图过\n(I) 51:22 14:II 来到 (11) 改变\n(I)\n107:15 开始了 (I) 男朋友\n(2) 33:2;48:7,8;49:8, I 62:21\n企图\n(I) 102:3\n代表\n(7) 50:1,4\n违反\n(I) 25;51:14,21;52:22; 指控\n(2)\n4:2 19:3,16;23:4,5; 7:10 82:2,15;88:11\n摄像机\n(I) I 40:22,25\n指控\n(2)\n参加\n(I) 64:10;79:12;82:3 中断\n(2) 50:22\n27:25 行为\n(2) 99:1,8 可以 (57) I 61:18;81:4\n追逐 (I)\n注意\n(8) 9:12;74:13 Brenda（布伦达）\n(4) 9:16,20;12:25; I 6:19\n20:16;26:6;28:24; 后面\n(I) 82:21,22,25;83:\nI 14:10;15:11,13,13; Chief（首席）(3)\n40:14,21;69:8,17; 56:17 简要 (5) 24:13,15;25:4,7,I0; I 56:23;76:5;78:9\n87:9 Beijing（北京）\n(4) 5:8;69:14,18;70:5; 26:6,9,16,18;27:2,15, China（中国）\n(11)\n律师\n(7) 33:10,12;48:7,8 72:25 16;28:17,20;31:5; 14:17,19,24;15:9;\n27:I;28:9;33:19; 有益的\n(I) 已简要陈述\n(I) 34:4,5;40:10;42:23; 48:25;49:2,2,9,10;\n42:9;46:I;58:8;64:25 86:15 3:I 43:17;46:7,18;47:25; 50:13,15\n音频 (3) 最佳 (I) 简报\n(I) 52:23;59:3;61:2; Chinese（中国人）\n(17)\n11:22,22;12:5 9:12 4:10 64:15;66:12;69:8; 14:18,20;20:9;\n真实的\n(2) 背叛\n(2) 简要地\n(5) 72:17,19;73:25;74:2; 30:25;35:I0;42:15;\n12:4,21 49:20,20 5:11;7:17;11:4; 77:23;83:17;87:12, 47:2;48:18;49:16;\n认证\n(I) 更好\n(7) 16:15;74:1 16,18;89:5;91:24; 50:6,14,20,25;59:23;\n69:20 48:2;75:11,12,16; 简报 (2) 92:10;98:15;99:5; 75:20;97:14;107:10\n真实性\n(3) 104:3,5,6 II:5,6 101:22;105:9,22; 选择\n(I)\n12:6;13:13;43:20 大的 (I) 带来 (3) 106:3;107:24;108:7; I 47:2\n可用的\n(I) 7:10 15:21;58:17,18 109:21 Citizen（公民）\n(I)\n8:3 更大的\n(I) British（英国的）\n(I) 取消\n(I) I 14:15\nAvenue（大道）(I) 50:24 106:8 63:5 City（城市）(2)\n98:3 最大的 (I) 扩大了\n(I) 能力\n(2) I 51:12;59:1\n避免 (4) 6:16 105:2 78:8;81:16 主张 (4)\n5:15;11:15;44:13; 账单 (2) 经纪人\n(3) 标题\n(I) 1100:16;101:12;\n46:15 52:17,21 19:1;58:16;64:14 11:23 102:4;104:15\n知悉\n(I) 活页夹\n(I) Bronx（布朗克斯）(I) 照顾\n(2) 澄清\n(3)\n75:22 43:21 103:21 13:18;105:5 I 19:13;32:10;89:17\n离开 (2) 有约束力的\n(I) 兄弟\n(5) 案件 (22) 清楚的 (18)\n42:24;86:20 87:11 48~14,17;50:10,12, 4:1;9:2;10:8; 5:4;9:18;12:15;\n斧头 (I) 一点 (6) 19 12:II;16:II;23:2,20; 17:3;22:3;24:4;\n73:5 47:7;51:10;52:25; 兄弟\n(2) 28:9;31:19;33:15,17; 33:22;41:25;45:5,17;\n8 56:16;91:15;92:3 18:7;48:20 47:18;70:4;79:7; 55':3;56:10;85:6;\n咬 (I) 建造 (I) 89:11;98:14;102:16; 94:8;101:25;I03:9;\n15:15 52:12 103:6;105:1,25; 108:23;109:20\n返回 (15) Blair（布莱尔）(I) 建筑物\n(4) 109:4,23 明确地\n(2)\n15:14;19:11;48:2, 84:17 6:12;58:20;67:16; 判例法\n(I) I 38:7;91:18\n7,8;49:9;50:15,16; 空白\n(2) 85:21 9:18 CLERK（书记员）\n(IS)\n51:21;52:23;63:4;\n87:2;89:13;99:15; 董事会\n(36) 负担\n(2) 案件 (4) 2:1,11;17:2,3,7;\n109:8 7:18,23;57:16,21; 98:7;107:24\n业务\n(3) 4:4,20;5:2;24:\n18 56:8,9,13;97:12,18,\n背景\n(4) 58:11,19,22;59:15, 15:9;18:11;57:9 随意的\n(I) 19,22,25;99:19;\n39:9;47:4,16;58:6 22,24;62:4,8,13,17; 业务\n(I) 25:25 103:19\n坏的 (I) 79:13,16,18,20,24; 18:4 原因\n(I) Cleveland（克利夫兰）\n(5)\n53:19 80:6,8,I0,12;83:22, 购买 (5) 3:19\nCEO（首席执行官）(I) 17:18;58:9;93:7,9,\n障碍\n(2) 23,25;84:2;85:25; 6:11;10:20;61:7, 7:17 11\n客户 (4)\n14:25;31:2 86:18,22;87:15; 10;85:5 某些\n(2)\n基于 (8) 90:10,13;93:10; 购买\n(I) II:25;89:19 I 5:3;8:23;58:17,18\n客户的\n(I)\n6:17;15:8;16:4; 95:10;106:4 81:22 当然\n(2)\nI 99:12\n\nMin-U-Script@ I\n\n(2) 附件 - 客户的\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记员）05/08/2019 02:34 PM\n案号 22-50073\n文件 440-15\n提交日期 05/25/22\n录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance（太平洋联盟）\nAsia（亚洲）诉\n126 之\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）\nClinic（诊所）(I)\n关于\n(I)\n4:16;50:6;60:3\n14,15;28:12,13;29:2,\n58:9\n32:21\n控制\n(I)\n6,11,13,15,20;30:21;\n片段 (5)\n让步\n(I)\n106:7\n32:11,14;34:7;35:7,\n10:5;11:22;13:10;\n21:6\n控制\n(4)\n16;37:8;38:19,25;\n91:11;92:15\n结论\n(I)\n8:15;10:21;87:5;\n40:13;41:12,19,21;\n片段 (3)\n102:16\n107:11\n43:11,23;44:20,25;\n9:3;10:4;13:5\n压缩\n(I)\n便利\n(3)\n45:24;46:9,11,13,17;\n关闭 (5)\n99:5\n21:16,19,22\n50:13;51:4,6;53:4,\nI\n45:10;63:3,5,8,15\n条件\n(I)\n谈话\n(3)\n10;54:6,24;55:15,22,\n已关闭 (I)\n58:19\n26:1;38:24;39:I\n25;56:3;58:\n15,25;\n63:18\n条件\n(2)\n谈话\n(I)\n59:3;60:8,22;61:2;\n结束陈述 (2)\n61:14;108:14\n38:23\n62:22;63:22\n行为\n(I)\nCOO（首席运营官）(2)\n67:1,9,14;68:13,16,\n同事\n(4)\n102:3\n6:6;57:11\n18,24;69:10,21,25;\n42:15;47:3,8;52:20\n进行\n(2)\n合作公寓 (I)\n70:1,5,9,11,21,24;\n收集 (13)\n102:12;103:10\n59:1\n71:1,3,5,14;72:8,10,\n27:5;28:3;31:13;\nconCer（会议）(I)\n合作\n(I)\n12,17,19,21;73:2;\n39:8;42:7,13,18;52:2,\n16:1\n10:1\n74:8,11,17,21;75:13,\n4,13,14;54:I;109:24\n保密的\n(I)\n合作的\n(2)\n23;76:7,23;77:3,7,9,\n已收集\n(2)\n59:21\n15:7;80:22\n12,12,15,18;78:\n14;\n42:5;54:9\n确认\n(I)\n副本 (I)\n85:2,23;86:2,7,24;\n收集\n(2)\n5:21\n78:24\n87:11,14,20;88:24; 第 114 页\nNYSCEF 收件日期：05/08/2019\n2019 年 4 月 26 日\n98:25;102:9;\n106:18\n目前\n(I)\nI 51:16\nfutting（切割）\n(I)\n20:11\nD\n每日 (2)\nI 52:15,16\n日期 (2)\nI 41:4;49:7\n日期为\n(I)\nI 45:10\n女儿\n(I)\nI 48:19\n日 (7)\n42:8;50:23;51:I;\n52:15;58:7;81:3;\n91:19\n\n哥伦比亚特区（1）\n42:9,14\n\n困惑的（2）\n89:10, 13;90:18,22;145:8\n\n学院（1）\n38:3;45:20\n\n17:11;69:22;72:2;\n92:2,8;93:2,5,8,12,\n14,16,19;94:3,4,6,11,\n15,18,21,25;95:6,16,\n22;96:10,15,19;97:4,\n8,10,12,17,21,23;\n98:4,5,19,23;99:7,\n11,20:16;21:15,18\n31:18;35:4,10,14,\n15,18,20,21,22,23;\n37:4;78:20\n100:2,6,12,17,25;\n101:6,10,12,15,17;\n102:9,19,21,23;\n103:17,23;104:3,8,\n19;105:12,16,19,22;\n106:2,9,12,16,21,25;\n107:8;108:1,9,18;\n109:3,7\n\n沟通（3）\n10:6;27:25;73:20\n\n共产党（11）\n14:20,22;20:9;\n42:15;47:3;48:18;\n49:16;50:6,14,20,25\n\n公司（3）\n7:24;18:15,19\n\n公司（4）\n8:22;34:18,18;47:4\n\n起诉状（7）\n100:10,13,15,20;\n102:2,3;109:5\n\n完整（1）\n3:21\n\n完成（2）\n44:15;75:14\n\n完全（2）\n11:12;38:20\n\n完整性（2）\n13:7;96:9\n\n完成（1）\n103:7\n\n复杂的（2）\n26:15;87:21\n\n遵守（1）\n76:9\n\n概念（2）\n15:6,10\n\n关切（1）\n105:10\n\n关切的（2）\n15:18\n6:17;88:20\n\n同意（2）\n78:1\n\n保守的（6）\n4:16;10:22;100:7\n\n考虑（3）\n9:20;94:3;102:21\n\n正在考虑（1）\n92:2\n\n一致的（2）\n38:20;65:19\n\n构成（1）\n29:25\n\n限制条件（1）\n62:24\n\n联系（9）\n19:5;66:4,20,21;\n67:1,4;82:18,20,21\n\n被联系（1）\n50:10\n\n主张（1）\n101:17\n\n语境（3）\n13:9;15:19;95:11\n\n继续（2）\n50:6;51:14\n\n持续的（3）\n44:8,24;45:20\n\n合同（7）\n15:2;63:6;75:24;\n76:7;85:11;86:22;\n104:13\n\n被反驳（1）\n8:6\n\n相反（1）\n26:13\n\n控制（3）\n3:20\n\n关联（1）\n76:2;77:9,16;78:5,21\n109:22\n\n谈话记录（1）\n84:13\n\n公司（3）\n15,17\n\n公司（2）\n37:4;78:20\n\n正确地（1）\n21:7\n\n腐败（1）\n14:23\n\n律师（7）\n2:4,12;32:6;71:7;\n72:16,24;107:17\n\n律师的（1）\n11:6\n\n法庭（1）\n9:12\n\n法院（1）\n46:14\n\n柜台（3）\n6:4;21:7;91:12\n\n反诉（1）\n62:18\n\n反驳（3）\n21:10,12;91:6\n\n柜台（1）\n91:13\n\n国家（3）\n9:25;15:6;49:20\n\n夫妇（3）\n16:15;67:6;95:21\n\n过程（9）\n10:24;12:24;26:2,\n2;95:4;99:14;102:22;\n107:7;108:9\n\n法院（211）\n2:6,23;3:4,10,13;\n8:17;9:16,19,20,21;\n11:10;16:1,17,21;\n17:9;19:23;22:4;\n23:16;24:8,15;25:3,\n23;26:10,15;27:10,\n75:1;77:5;89:18,20,\n20,23;90:4;91:4;\n95:16;96:2,3,5,6,8,15\n\n文化的（1）\n76:16\n\n当前的（3）\n3:20\n\n副本（8）\n46:1\n\n复制（1）\n15:6;73:12;94:10;\n98:16\n\n企业的（3）\n15:17\n\n公司（2）\n35:4,10,14,\n15,18,20,21,22,23;\n37:4;78:20\n\n辩护律师（7）\n2:4,12;32:6;71:7;\n72:16,24;107:17\n\n法庭（1）\n9:12\n\n法院（1）\n46:14\n\n覆盖（1）\n6:18\n\n覆盖范围（1）\n8:17\n\n涵盖（1）\n61:17\n\n《纽约州民事诉讼法与规则》（CPLR）（4）\n5:24;9:6;24:24;\n45:22\n\n可信度（2）\n26:20;46:15\n\n债权人（2）\n3:25;98:9\n\n交叉（18）\n13:6;16:12;47:22;\n75:1;77:5;89:18,20,\n20,23;90:4;91:4;\n95:16;96:2,3,5,6,8,15\n\n封面（1）\n62:20\n\n被告（6）\n2:20;3:20;10:3;\n98:9;100:25;106:19\n\n被告（2）\n12:16;108:18\n\n被告的（7）\n76:20,21,24;77:13,\n23;78:13;101:1\n\n决定（1）\n103:1\n\n已决定（1）\n108:1\n\n决定（4）\n107:6,11,14,16\n\n决定（1）\n96:8\n\n深的（1）\n109:8\n\n违约（1）\n4:15\n\n击败（1）\n62:18\n\n被告（6）\n2:20;3:20;10:3;\n98:9;100:25;106:19\n\n被告（2）\n12:16;108:18\n\n被告的（7）\n76:20,21,24;77:13,\n23;78:13;101:1\n\n定义（2）\n52:1,1\n\n欺诈（2）\n3:25;98:9\n\n被欺诈（2）\n8:10,13\n\n交付（1）\n96:8\n\n要求（1）\n3:20\n\nMin-U-Script（3）诊所－要求\n\n纽约县书记官处已提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 文件 440-15\n已提交：05/25/22 已录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 115 页\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） 共 126 页 第 115 页 April 26, 2019\nI\n\n证明（2）\n5:15;9:1\n\n示证材料（1）\n90:19\n\n被否认（3）\n8:3;24:21;38:22\n\n否认（3）\n7:1,3;107:4\n\n否认（1）\n6:3\n\n作证（3）\n41:25;42:3,10\n\n已作证（8）\n7:18;29:23;30:3,\n19,22;31:3,10,24\n\n进行作证（2）\n31:6;42:22\n\n保证金（11）\n6:16;61:17,20;\n62:3;63:19,24;64:7;\n67:18;80:24;81:1,3\n\n证言笔录（42）\n8:2,10;9:5,7,13;\n11:7,16;12:4;17:12;\n28:4;29:19,22;31:25;\n32:7,8,22;33:16,18;\n34:20;35:14;38:12,\n23;39:25;42:23;43:2;\n66:13,15;73:18;89:4;\n92:4,9;93:17,21;\n94:12,13;95:17,20;\n96:11,21,23;101:13;\n107:15\n\n证言笔录（1）\n13:4\n\n深度（1）\n103:12\n\n源自（2）\n62:3,4\n\n描述（1）\n58:14\n\n指定（18）\n13:6;89:18,18;\n90:5;91:7,13,15;92:5,\n6,13,14,16,19,24;\n93:1,23;96:9;97:2\n\n指定（14）\n13:7;89:20,21,24;\n91:4,4,8;93:23;\n95:16;96:2,2,3,5,6\n\n细节（2）\n58:15;103:12\n\n详细的（1）\n59:25\n\n细节（2）\n38:9;39:7\n\n拘留（1）\n49:19\n\n决定（3）\n102:24;103:4,14\n\n确定（1）\n103:2\n\n开发商（1）\n24:17\n\n骰子（1）\n13:3\n\n词典（1）\n53:22\n\n差异（6）\n35:8;36:9,11,14;\n53:2,4\n\n不同的（10）\n18:8,10,11;27:9;\n29:8,8,9;66:11;67:6;\n96:6\n\n困难的（1）\n75:18\n\n困难（2）\n57:14;59:22;65:14\n\n摘要（1）\n47:11\n\n直接的（11）\n9:22;17:17;20:16;\n26:6;28:23;40:14,21;\n54:15;56:14;69:8,17\n\n被指示（2）\n102:5;107:17\n\n直接地（3）\n8:6;46:15,16\n\n董事（3）\n57:22;87:15;106:4\n\n分歧（2）\n12:24;44:19\n\n消失（3）\n47:9;51:24;52:20\n\n披露（1）\n75:23\n\n证据开示（9）\n15:21,23;16:2;\n44:18;102:3,12;\n103:8;109:3,21\n\n差异（3）\n45:7,9,17\n\n自由裁量的（1）\n104:4\n\n讨论（7）\n22:14;37:23;38:1,\n2,4;44:8,24\n\n已讨论（1）\n62:17\n\n讨论（4）\n24:3;33:5;38:\n14;39:5\n\n讨论（3）\n19:3;37:21,24\n\n展示（7）\n3:12;19:22;23:15;\n28:11;40:12;43:22;\n69:9\n\n被剥夺（1）\n98:12\n\n争议（4）\n4:17;18:3;44:4,21\n\n有争议的（1）\n12:6\n\n离婚（4）\n21:16,19,22\n19:14\n\n文件（37）\n17:15;19:20;23:13;\n25:17;26:1,4,7,13,21;\n29:10;40:15;41:10,\n16,20;43:4,14,21;\n44:20;45:3,10;46:4,\n20,21,23;54:23;\n59:24;68:3;69:15,19,\n20,24;71:12,16,17,\n23;77:14,20\n\n书面证据的（1）\n7:5\n\n文件资料（3）\n75:7;82:25;83:1,9,11,\n14,15\n\n文件（42）\n15:25;27:4,5,9;\n28:10,10;31:4,5,13,\n21;39:8;42:7,8,12,14,\n19,20,22,24;45:7,8,\n18;47:13,15;49:17;\n52:5,14;53:10,13,14,\n17,20,23,25;54:1,2;\n60:6;67:19;78:24;\n79:10,11;84:12\n\n美元（1）\n60:1\n\n支配（1）\n8:15\n\n支配（1）\n4:16\n\n完成（4）\n14:12;15:20;65:12;\n105:4\n\n双重（2）\n61:6;85:6\n\n怀疑（1）\n22:7\n\n向下（6）\n38:8;39:6;55:22;\n63:19,25;107:3\n\n起草（1）\n27:1\n\n绘制（2）\n63:19,25\n\n删除（1）\n47:10\n\n正式地（5）\n17:1;56:7;59:2;\n97:18,19\n\n期间（7）\n6:7;11:16;12:25;\n61:5;95:4,20;105:1\n\n职责（1）\n10:25\n\n东部（1）\n17:6\n\n较早（2）\n79:2;99:2\n\n最早（3）\n21:16,19,22\n\n早期（1）\n19:14\n\n耳朵（1）\n13:11\n\n编辑（1）\n99:2\n\n教育（1）\n10:25\n\nEdward（爱德华）（1）\n2:14\n\n效力（1）\n107:1\n\n有效地（1）\n56:25\n\n高效的（1）\n90:16\n\n努力（2）\n5:15;8:17\n\n努力（5）\n5:25;14:3,20;\n18:24;19:17\n\n任一（12）\n6:14;8:10;22:10,\n20;28:15;42:15,16,\n17;47:9;51:23;84:7;\n90:1\n\n年长者（2）\n48:14;50:10\n\n要素（1）\n98:8\n\n要素（2）\n3:18;4:15\n\n引出（1）\n32:18\n\n引出（1）\n28:21\n\n其他（6）\n52:18;54:13;55:21;\n84:21;88:13;105:8\n\n他人的（1）\n13:16\n\n电子邮件（15）\n10:6;19:25;20:3,6,\n7,8,12,17,25;21:1,8;\n22:12;77:25;78:3;\n103:21\n\n已电邮（1）\n22:11\n\n电子邮件（2）\n19:15;20:14\n\n强调（1）\n42:6\n\n受雇（1）\n56:18\n\n雇员（2）\n48:22;51:23\n\n雇主（1）\n18:22\n\n担保负担（5）\n5:24;24:19;44:9;\n45:22,23\n\n设定担保负担（1）\n98:12\n\n设定担保负担（1）\n21:16,19,22\n\n结束（2）\n49:22;65:22\n\n执行（1）\n98:10\n\n英格兰（1）\n65:1\n\n英语（20）\n15:1,4,5,14;19:7,\n10,11;30:24;31:1;\n47:7;53:18,19;68:3;\n75:7;82:25;83:1,9,11,\n14,15\n\n足够（6）\n5:3;16:22;51:4;\n72:20;90:21;109:8\n\n进入（2）\n85:11;86:22\n\n已录入（6）\n75:23;76:6,16;\n79:4;106:19;107:2\n\n全部（2）\n92:17;94:1\n\n实体（16）\n8:4,15;10:19,20,21,\n23;36:21,25;37:2;\n100:11,14;104:21,25;\n105:3;108:12;109:18\n\n有权（4）\n19:6,15;96:21;\n101:20\n\n权利（1）\n102:14\n\n实体（18）\n27:12;29:8,8,9;\n52:5;81:20,23;\n101:18;105:16,22,24;\n106:2,6,7,8,10,16;\n107:13\n\n错误（1）\n85:3\n\n尤其（2）\n27:23;75:10\n\n设立（2）\n3:24;100:18\n\n已设立（4）\n70:11,14;102:14,\n25\n\n确立（1）\n102:19\n\n遗产（1）\n47:6\n\n估计的（2）\n61:18;103:18\n\n欧洲（2）\n48:7;49:3\n\n评估（1）\n26:19\n\n闪烁其词的（1）\n21:16,19,22\n\n闪烁其词（2）\n9:18,23\n\nMin-U-Script（4）证明－闪烁其词\n\n纽约县书记官处已提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 文件 440-15\n已提交：05/25/22 已录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 116 页\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\nKwokHoWan（郭文贵） 共 126 页 第 116 页 April 26, 2019\nI\n\n甚至（16）\n5:16;87:14;88:19;\n92:4,5;93:20;96:\n11;102:13\n\n每个人（2）\n52:17;99:10\n\n证据（36）\n4:5,8,8,9,21;5:7,8,\n9,18;7:5;9:22;12:22;\n13:19,23;16:8,16;\n19:24;23:22;24:10;\n25:2,9;26:22;41:11;\n53:8;60:7;69:19,20;\n72:10,21;78:13;\n90:23;92:11;93:1,25;\n103:15;108:25\n\n证据性的（2）\n90:22;103:11\n\n恰好（3）\n6:12;9:25;14:11\n\n审查（1）\n16:12\n\n已审查（3）\n17:2;56:8;97:20\n\n例子（1）\n13:9\n\n超过（1）\n3:20\n\n摘录（1）\n8:3\n\n交换（1）\n19:15\n\n删除（1）\n95:20\n\n不包括（1）\n61:5\n\n借口（4）\n11:5;19:16;20:11;\n95:2\n\n被免除（2）\n55:23;88:25\n\n免除（1）\n61:9\n\n执行（1）\n67:16\n\n行政人员（3）\n6:6;56:23;78:8\n\n证物（36）\n3:12;19:22;23:15;\n24:1,2,9;28:11;40:10,\n12,24;41:12,13,14;\n43:21,22;53:7;69:9,\n21;71:16,21,22;72:1;\n76:20,22,23,24;77:3,\n5,10,23;78:13,18;\n92:4,5;93:20;96:\n11;102:13\n\n出示证物（1）\n14:23\n\n证物（9）\n12:18,20,25;15:1;\n24:2;42:4,5;53:\n11,12;92:10\n\n存在（2）\n44:9;54:23\n\n存在（2）\n46:13;107:5\n\n加急的（1）\n32:18\n\n昂贵的（1）\n6:2\n\n解释（4）\n6:15;18:5;30:16;\n36:11\n\n表述（1）\n13:19\n\n现存的（2）\n90:22;103:11\n\n延长的（1）\n9:3;23:25;87:18\n\n广泛的（2）\n14:20;32:15\n\n广泛地（1）\n11:5\n\n范围（6）\n25:5;90:5;91:7,12;\n92:8;93:24\n\n检查（1）\n16:12\n\n已检查（3）\n17:2;56:8;97:20\n\n事实（4）\n6:4;21:5;102:16;\n104:24\n\n因素（1）\n9:20\n\n事实（5）\n5:19;36:6;37:9;\n100:15;108:2\n\n公平的（9）\n12:7;16:22;60:21;\n72:20;79:9,15;85:7,\n8;90:21\n\n仙女（1）\n95:10\n\n熟悉的（1）\n3:2\n\n家庭（50）\n14:19,19;15:10;\n17:20,21,22,25;18:1,\n2,3,5,5,8,8,10,10,10,\n11,12,13,14,15,18,22;\n23:6;47:8;48:5,6,9,\n10,11,12,14,19,24;\n49:6,9,13,20,21;50:7;\n51:12,13,15,20;52:2,\n2,8,11;53:24\n\n远（4）\n83:11,14;89:15;\n95:24;97:6\n\n时尚（1）\n32:18\n\n形成（1）\n109:14\n\n有利（1）\n98:11\n\nFBAKOY（2）\n40:22,25\n\n特征（1）\n4:10\n\n二月（3）\n18:18;59:10;63:3\n\n感觉（1）\n108:24\n\n英尺（1）\n90:19\n\nfeng（1）\n63:7\n\n少数（3）\n46:3,6\n9:3;23:25;87:18\n\nFirth（1）\n14:19\n\n打斗（1）\n11:15\n\n数字（3）\n47:12;53:22;91:16\n\n填写（1）\n76:21\n\n最终（3）\n102:24;103:6,14\n\n最终（3）\n7:6;8:14;11:20\n\n财务的（11）\n7:19,22;31:6;47:5;\n59:15,17,25;79:11;\n90:11,12,14\n\n财务资料（1）\n7:24\n\n查找（1）\n68:22\n\n认定（2）\n32:16;102:15\n\n罚款（8）\n83:11,14;89:15;\n95:24;97:6;99:17,22;\n109:18\n\n手指（1）\n13:11\n\n完成（1）\n48:7\n\n公司（2）\n62:14;69:13\n\n公司（2）\n62:15;92:3\n\n五（4）\n39:6;48:16;49:11;\n62:18\n\n五年（1）\n61:18\n\n流利的（2）\n83:15,16\n\n焦点（1）\n4:19\n\n文件夹（1）\n59:21\n\n遵循（2）\n34:5;84:24\n\n已遵循（1）\n11:15\n\n下列（5）\n17:17;47:22;55:16;\n56:14;75:1;84:22;\n96:15;98:20\n\n遵循如下（3）\n17:2;56:8;97:20\n\n强制（1）\n50:7\n\n外国的（6）\n6:11;31:1;61:10;\n85:7,15;87:8\n\n伪造（1）\n47:17\n\n伪造的（5）\n49:16,17,18;50:21,\n25\n\n忘记（1）\n49:7\n\n形式（4）\n4:16;74:18;81:7;\n95:4\n\n前任的（3）\n58:7,9;84:17\n\n提出（1）\n20:23\n\n向前（2）\n12:11;20:20\n\n打斗（1）\n95:10\n\n认定（2）\n3:16;5:10;69:17\n\n四（3）\n3:16;5:10;69:17\n\n法国（1）\n50:2\n\n欺诈（3）\n4:25;5:5;46:\n16\n\n欺诈性的（1）\n25:1\n\n自由（1）\n5:1,13;10:5;12:13;\n16:15,23;30:20,25;\n32:7;35:6;36:16,\n20;42:21;46:25;\n47:13;55:7;62:10;\n86:21;104:16;109:15\n\n法式的（1）\n31:1\n\nFrick（弗里克）（1）\n58:8\n\n前面（13）\n24:8,14,20;25:2;\n30:9,21;31:7;46:22;\n50:22;51:2;53:6;\n54:12;97:3\n\n挫败（5）\n4:1;5:1;11:9;\n24:18;98:10\n\n完全的（4）\n13:9;17:4;56:9;\n93:10\n\n完全地（1）\n3:1\n\n进一步（1）\n47:20\n\nGaro（加罗）（1）\n2:17\n\n收集（11）\n27:5,8;28:3;33:6,\n18;34:17;35:19;37:1;\n41:6;53:10,16\n\n已收集（13）\n22:9,14,19;30:17;\n31:20,21;36:22;37:7,\n10,13;39:22;53:2,13\n\n给予（5）\n26:19;43:25;51:2;\n59:21;79:9\n\n齿轮（1）\n62:21\n\n一般的（3）\n56:25;57:11,11\n\n通常（3）\n58:6,14;82:21\n\nGenever（42）\n8:15,24;10:19;\n33:14,21,24;34:13,\n15,15,22,23;36:21,\n25;37:4,4;39:12,15,\n19;40:2;67:16;76:6;\n88:20,20;95:8,9;\n100:10,14;104:19,20,\n21,25;105:3,13,16,\n17,23;106:2,6,10,22,\n23;107:11\n\nGilbert（吉尔伯特）（2）\n77:25;81:11\n\n给予（13）\n9:9;25:6;26:12,13;\n31:12;36:10;76:2;\n79:16;98:21;99:4;\n101:15;109:1,13\n\n给予（1）\n25:7\n\nMin-U-Script（5）甚至－给予\n\n纽约县书记官处已提交：05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 文件 440-15\n已提交：05/25/22 已录入：05/26/22 15:30:37 第 117 页\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\nKwokHoWan（郭文贵） 共 126 页 第 117 页 April 26, 2019\n\n给予 (13) 45:25 39:3;49: 14;74:8; 23;95:2,3;96:25; I 24:8;25:8;29:22;\n20: 18;29:24;30: 11; 中途\n(I) 90:8;95:7;98:22,24 98:21 ;99: 17;100:5,9, 30:1\n32:3;34:2,11,25; 91:19 听证\n(13) 19,24; 10I: 14, 16; 重要\n(3)\n38: 17;40:8;42: I; 手\n(2) 13:1,8,20; 15:22; 102: I; 103:9, 10; I 9:9,10;30:24\n80: 13;106: 17,24 77:3,16 35: 19;45:24,25;55:5; 104:2,6; 105:21; 重要的是\n(I)\n全球 (I) 交付\n(10) 63:7;90:22;98:7; 106: I, 15; 107:7,22, I 8:25\n6:20 17: 15;19:20;23: 13; 100:18;103:11 24; 108: 15;109:6,14 判处 (I)\nGMail（谷歌邮箱）\n(I) 43: 14;69: 15,24; 心\n(I) 法官阁下的\n(I) I 61: 13\n20:4\n进行 (3) 71 :23;77: 14,20,22\n处理\n(3) 109:23 13: 18 不可能\n(I)\n46: 15,16;107:3 27:24;35: II ;51 :25 脚跟 (1) 希望 (3) I 91: 15\nGolden（戈尔登）\n(13) 已处理\n(3) 66:23\n举行 (3) 13:21;16:6,7\n无望\n(I) 不当\n(I)\n23:5;27:3;42:7; 15:24,24,25 57:2;81:7,14 42:18 I 107:17\n47:2;51: 16,19,21,23, 手\n(4) 帮助 (11) Hoplamazian（霍普拉马齐安）\n(3) 不足\n(I)\n25;52: 1,11,22;53:24 31:12,22;35:12; 27:8;28:9;42: 18; 2: 17,17;69:22 I 79:25\n无意中\n(I)\n良好 (13) 47:16 45: 13;47:8, 18,18; Horvitz（霍维茨）\n(18) I 101: 18\n2:9,13,21,24; 便利\n(I) 52: 13,13,14;73: 12 7: 16, 16,22;8:2,8, 不适当\n(3)\n12:12;13:5;47: 12,24; 4:7 有帮助\n(I) 12;58:2;81: 16;84:2, I\n11:13,18;72:5\n56: 16;75:3,4,8, 10 发生\n(2) 4:11 8,24,25;85:3 ;89:4; 包括\n(4)\n政府 (3)\n31:2;50:19 帮助 (I) 90:7,8,12;93 :2 I 96:4;104:25;105:3;\n14:18,21,22 发生\n(9) 7:3 Horvitz's（霍维茨的）\n(2) 109: 18\n亲切地\n(I) 6:9,13;9:13;10:15; 嘿 (2) 58:6;90:24 已包括\n(2)\n96:22 II: 1;12:8;27:23; 7:12;12:5 酒店 (4) I 7:24;58:24\n准许 (1) 33:15,17 高度 (2) 6: 10,14;7:21 ;57:8 包括\n(9)\n103:13 正在发生\n(4) 84:11,12 小时\n(4) 18:6,7;33: 18;\n感激\n(I) 14:3,4;38:9;42:24 其本人 (5) 2:7;45:25;92:\n13; 48: 19,22,25;49: I;\n36:10 发生\n(I) 10:24,25;18:7; 94:2 52: 12,13\n很大 (1) 85:20 51: 15;86:20 Huang（黄）\n(I) 不一致\n(3)\n15:15 愉快地\n(I) Ho（何） (4) 97:15 25:6;26: 17;38: 19\nt\n更大\n(I) 2:7 2:2; 17:24;59:4; H-U-A-N-G\n(I) 索引 (I)\n109:9 高兴\n(5) 98:2 97:16 I 2:1\n成长 (I) 44: 12;46: 19;91:20, H-O (I) 一百\n(2) 表明\n(5)\n14:16 21;99:5 98:2 18:6,9 I 32:20;76: 12;96: I,\n研磨\n(I) 困难\n(2) Hodgson（霍奇森）\n(2) 丈夫\n(13) 18;108:3\n73:6 9:21;91:3 2:19,22 49: 13, 19, 19,19,20, 表明\n(I)\n理由\n(2) HARMON（哈蒙）\n(69) 持有 (2) 22;50:1,4,8,10,11,19, I 31:11\n3:23;70:8\n增长 (I) 2:21,22;5:25;\n12: 12;34:3;43: 16; 60:10,14 23 个人\n(I)\n14:16 60:5,20;62:6;63:\nII; Holdings（控股）\n(2)\n37:4,4 I I 49:1\n保证\n(4) 66:6,9,15;67:12;68:9, 持有 (I) 诱使\n(2)\n61:25;67: 19;68: 19; 15,17;69: 12,18;70:7; 105:24 JD (2) I 7:21;8:19\n不公平\n(I)\n100:3 71:11,15,25;72:9,18; Hong（洪） (4) 40:22,25\n已保证\n(I) 73:4;74:5,14,16,20; 14:17;18:15;49:3; 想法 (3) I 5:2\n信息\n(72)\n8:23 75:2,5;76: 19,24;77:4, 法官阁下\n(106) 身份证明\n(I) 10,15,15,16,19,20;\n猜测 (5) 8,11,13,16,19;78:12; 83: 17,21;84:21 ;85:4, 2:9,13,21,24;3:\n1,9, 77:23 27 :2,5,6,6, 9;28: 3,3;\n30: 15;32:2;35: 13; 71: 1,1 9;87: 1,18,23;88:23; 14;4:22;5:4;8: 1,12, 已识别\n(I) 30: 16, 17, 18;31 :21;\n猜测\n(I) 89:2,12,15;92:21\n; 25;9:10,13;11:4,20; 108:12 33:6,7,19;34: 17;35:3,\n70:25 94: 17, 19,23;95:2; 12:10, 12;13:2,5,8,21; 识别\n(I) 9,11,19,19,24;36:1,\nGuo（郭） (23) 100:24;101:4,7,11, 14:12;15:16;16:9, 10, 3:6 14,23;37: I,7, 10, 12,\n17:22,25,25; 18:2,5, 14,16,22; 102:22; 14,20,22;17:10,11; 忽略\n(I) 13,14,20;39:8,22;\n5,22;23 :6;48:4,6,9, 108:20; 109:6,11 19:19;23:22;24:4, 12, 30:2 41 :7;42:7,8;43:9;\n10,12,24;49:6;51: 12, Haroche（阿罗什）\n(I) 13;29: 14;30:21 ;34:3; 想象\n(I) 49: 18;52: 14;54:9;\n13,15,19;52:2,8,11; 81:11 38:22;41 :8;43: 13,16, 9:21 58:24;59: 15,18,20;\n53:24 听到 (14) 21;44:1,10;46:7,8,18; IMG (1) 60: I,2,4, 10;79:3, II,\nG-U-O (2) 3:16;13:20,25; 47:21 ;48:3;51 :9; 58:10 即时\n(2) 90:11,12,14;98:22,\n17:22;18:2 14:10;16:3;32: 16,17; 55:3,13,14;60:5,20; 48:11;104:12 24;101:3,8\nH 33:6;43: 10;44:3; 62:6;63: 11;67: 12; 影响\n(2) 发起\n(2)\n47:25;89: II ;90: 18; 68:9;69: 18,22;70:7; 101:19;107:13\n遭黑客攻击\n(1)\n20:8 听取\n(15)\n29:7,7;30: 10;33:5; 77: 1,4,8,16;78: 12; 弹劾\n(2) 禁令\n(2)\n一半 (1) 35:20;37:7, I0;38:25; 83: 17;89:2,7;90:7;\n92: 12;93:23;94: 17, 28: 17,20 I\n109:19,19\n弹劾\n(4) 询问 (3)\n\nMin-U-Script® (6) 给予－询问\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 文件 440-15\n已提交 05/25/22 已登记 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 118 页\nNYSCEF 已收悉：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） 126页之 April 26, 2019\n\n64: 10;66:3;82:3 106:8 知道 (13) 68: 10;71 :6;72: 16,24, 83:10\nI\n询问\n(I) 争议 (25) 21: 1;22:4,8,25; 25;74: 13;75:7;82: 18; 冗长\n(I)\n82:6 3: 17,21,22;4: 12,12, 25:22;27:4;69:2; 83:5,23;84:4;\n101: 13 I 98:20\n被指示\n(2) 14;15:17, 18;24:4, 10, 76:5;80: 12,17, 19; 较少 (2)\n11:10;83:2 15,19;26: 14;41: 18; 81:22;105:2 L :\n99:3,9\n指示\n(I) 51 :25;54: 16;55:4; 知识\n(39) 较后\n(8)\n11:24 88:16;91:14,24; 5:20,20;26:24; 放置 (2) I 64:25;71:9;72:4,7,\n指令\n(I) 102:2,7,17; 103: 12; 27:7,21;28:1;29:11; 44:2; 100:21 8,19;78:5,17\nII: 18 108:2 31:20,21 ;32:21 ;33:3, 语言\n(10) 信件\n(2)\n指示\n(I)\n11:6 签发 (2) 8,11;34:14;35:18,22; 14:25; 15: 17;30:24, I 84:14,16\n意图\n(I) 88:1 ;104:4\n争议 (12) 36:6,7,22;37:3,6,9,\n13,14,15;43:9;47:5,6; 25,25;31: 1,2;36: 15; 说谎者 (I)\n47:17\n100:22 2:25;3:6;5:22; 53: 1,2;54:8, 16,18,22; 53: 17;54: 12\n最后 (13) !\n自由\n(I)\n意图\n(I) 10: 15;15:21,23;16:2; 55:7,9,10;62:7;64:3 11:20;13:10;18:21; I\n95: 11\n92:23 24: I;52:21 ;54: 12; 已知\n(2) 26:6;32: 19;44:2; 撒谎 (3)\n意图\n(I) 100:8;109:22 3:20;84:8 50:9;82:22;86:8; I 8:10;107:12,14\n99:4 签发\n(I) 知道 (3) 95:7;97: 15; 102:6; 生命 (I)\n意图\n(I) 102:21 9:25;28: 14;52: 18 109: 12 I 51:21\n11:8 Kong（孔） (4) 之后\n(2) 解除 (2)\n意图 (10) J 14:17;18:16;49:3; 9:11;68:23 i 44:18;45:19\n3:25;4:6,18;5: I; 84:7 法律 (2) 轻\n(I)\n14:2;24: 18;25: I; 监狱 (4) Kwok（郭） (154) 62:14;70:2 I\n61:1\n98:9;107:18;108:11 14:21 ;48: 17,18,21 2:3;3:25;5: 16,22; 诉讼\n(I) 可能 (I)\n意图\n(I) Jillian（吉莉安）\n(I) 6:7,13,18,24;7:\n1,3,7, 78:25 I 12:17\n103: 11 2:19 20,25;8:3,9,14,15,23; 诉讼\n(I) 有限\n(3)\n利益\n(I) 工作 (I) 9: 1,10,13,24; 10:5,10, 9:24 ~ 31:15;54:11;80:12\n107:23 42:16 .20;11:6,17,23;13:10; 律师\n(3) 行 (2)\n感兴趣\n(3) 加入\n(I) 14:6,7,8,11,13,15,15, 39:8,9;50: 10 I 34:5;91 :24\n9:8;99:12,13 102:2 16,23,25; 15:4, 16,19; 律师\n(2) 行\n(3)\n利益\n(I) Jones（琼斯）\n(I) 16:11;17:19,24;18:1, 54:12;69:5 I 38:13;91:21;108:2\n8:4 58:7 13;19:3,6,6,9,9, 17; Leading（领先）\n(6) 列出\n(2)\n国际\n(I) 判决书\n(9) 21:9, 12,24;22:4,8,13, 27: 13;54:3;66:6,9, I 58:17;106:12\n58:10 4: 1;5: 1;6:22;9:2; 20,22,25;23:4;27:\n10, 11;74:7 听\n(I)\n口译员\n(7) 11:9,10;24: 18;98: 10; 18;28: 14,23;29:3; 学习\n(4) , 53: 18\n,\n97: 10,12, 14,15, 18, 109:25 33: 13,20;37:24;38:5, 25:24;33:16;47:11; 诉讼\n(I)\n21;103:18 June（六月）\n(I) 14;39:1,11,14,19; 68:25 I\n102:13\n讯问\n(I) 78:21 40: 1;48: 13,13;51 :15; 已学习\n(6) 诉讼\n(3)\n49:19\n打断\n(2) Justice（法官）\n(2) 59:4,4,12;60:9;61\n:5, 29:10;33:15,17; 152:13;101:19;\n91:2;94:8 7: 14;25:23 9,22;62: 16,19,24; 48: 12;64:23;70: 14 107:13\n打断\n(I) K 63: 18;64:9;65:4, 14, 学习\n(2) 小 (6)\n41:9 22;66:3,10;67:\n10,15,\n24;68:4,13,21 ;69:5; 25:24;31: I ' 47:7;51:10;56:16;\n进入 (14) Kathy（凯西）\n(10) 70:5,12,18;71 :6; 租赁 (10)\n7: 10;62: 1;67:20, I 57:10;92:3;105:15\n居住 (3)\n12:22;19:11;24:10; 19: 1,6,7,12;21 :8; 73:6;74: 18;75:6; 22;68:7,10,16;70:\n13; I\n49:2,3;98:3\n29:25;30:23;45:21, 22:8,11,20,23;64:\n14 76:6,12,17;78:25; 88:17,21 生活\n(6)\n25;66: 11;72: 10;76:7; 保留 (2) 79: 12,21;80: 13;81:1, 至少\n(3) 17:18;25:7;83:12;\n85:11;86:22;92:11; 41 :9;88:4 6,22;82:2,10,23; 47:7;70: 16;95:21 93:7,9,10\n103:11 保留\n(I) 84:10;85:11,14,18; 离开\n(I) 生活\n(I)\n介绍\n(I) 59:21 86: 14,16;87:5;90: 10; 33:9 I 33:9\n25:9 关键\n(2) 95:10,11;97:9,11; 离开\n(2) LLC（有限责任公司） (23)\n涉及 (5) 5:22;23:25 98:2,20;99:3; 101: I, 42:17;50:5 6:11,11;34:18,18;\n27:24;35:11;38:8, 绑架\n(I) 17;104: 11;105:7,14, 留下\n(5) 37:4;61 :6,10;81: 12,\n9;86: 18 47:3 18,19; 1~6:20,22; 42: 17;47:9;49: 10, 14;85:5,6,7,15;86: 12,\n涉及 (8) 被绑架\n(3) 107:4,8,12,14,17 10;51 :23 K-W-O-K\n(2) 剩余\n(I) 13,17,20;87:3,5,8;\n27:7;57: 12,14, 18; 42: 15;47:9;48:21 Kwok's（郭文贵的）\n(36) 51:24 LLC's（有限责任公司的） (I)\n87:3,7,8;92:3 被杀\n(I) 18:1;98:2 法律\n(8) I 6: 11\nIra（艾拉） (I) 11:25 5: 14,17;8:2;9:5; 4:5; 10:I;25: 17, 19; 位于\n(I)\n77:25 种类\n(3) 11:23;12:2;14:2; 26: I;31:6;53:20; I 48:25\n无关\n(I) 31 :5;34: 17;39:23 11:23;12:2;14:2; 26: I;31:6;53:20; 逻辑\n(I)\n67:13 种类\n(I) 17:21,23; 18:3, 15,24; 105:12 L\n不论\n(I) 37:12 19:1;23:7;48:11; 合法地\n(I) London（伦敦）\n(I)\n90:1 Kingdom（王国）\n(I) 58:3;62:15,22;64:\n16, 87:13 ! 83:12\nIslands（群岛）\n(I) 84:17 21,24;65:4,6;66:\n19; 长度\n(I) i\n\nMin-U-Script® (7) 询问－London\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331 案件 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 文件 440-15\n已提交 05/25/22 已登记 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 119 页\nNYSCEF 已收悉：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） 126页之 April 26, 2019\n\n长（5）\n47: 11;57:2,8; 许多（6）\n4:3; II: 16;44: 17; 38:6,6;39: 18;61: 12\n实体理由\n（8） 70:16 7: 14;8:9; 106:20\nI\n92: 16;108:21 50:5;57: 17;81: 19 10:13;12:17;24:3; 每月\n（1） 本人（1）\n更长（4） 三月\n（4） 102:4,12,16; 103:6; 6:18\n数月\n（7） I 36:4\n神秘的\n（1）\n14:4;70: 17;102:23; 41 :24;43:6;63:4,5 109:21 44:17;45:19;49:11, I 107:10\n103:24 Mark（马克）\n（3） 信息（3） 14,24;50: 12;78:23\n长期\n（1） 2:21 ;72: 1;75:5 19:9,11;22:22 更多（23） N\n48:22 标记\n（2） 信息\n（1） 6: 1;9:22; 18:6,9; I\n看（18） 77:22;89:6 10:7 20:9;25: 1;48: 10, 13, I\n姓名（23）\n12:10;23: 12;25: 12; 市场\n（6） 信使\n（2） 14;49:14,24;50:11; 6:9;7: I; J 7:4,5,23,\n28:9,13;29:3,19; 6:3;55:7,11,12,18, 22:18,21 55: 14;59:25;83 :21, 25; 18:I;20: 19;56:9;\n32:11;41:19;53:14, 20 会见（4） 22;86:21 ;89:9;90: 16; 60: 14, 18;64: 16, 17,\n21 ;54:7;62:9;70: II; 已婚\n（1） 59:24;75:5; 102: 11; 94:19;102:9,15; 18;68: 14;74:4;80: 19;\n78: 16;92:2;93:2;95:6 50:3 107:23 108:25 82:22;88:8;97: 15,15,\n寻找（1） 材料\n（1） Michael（迈克尔）\n（4） 早晨\n（10） 25;98:3\n50:15 8:18 56: 11;58:2;90:7,7 2:7,10,13,21,25; 必然地\n（3）\n看来（1） 事项\n（4） 中旬（1） 3:6; 12: 12;47:24; I 85: 16;86: 18;87:9\n40:20\n很多（19） 2:2;24:22; 104: 1,20\n邮寄件\n（1） 71:2\n可能（2） 52:25;56: 16\nMOSS\n（86） 必要的\n（2）\n19:8;20:8,18; 97:23 53:6;98: 10 2:9,13,14,24;3:8, I 14:7;61:1\n需要（17）\n24: 16;27: I;31 :2; 可以（23） Miles（迈尔斯）\n（7） 11,14;10:10,18;11:4, 6:23;10:2;11:15;\n42:8,20;47:8;48:\n18; 8:21 ;9:7; 19:19; 20: 17;21: 16,19,21, 20; 12: 10;16: 14, 19, 25 :9;32: 13;45 :2;\n49: 16;50:21 ;52: 19, 33:6;38: 1;41:4,22; 24;48: 13;59:4 22;17:11,18;19:19, 50: 13;53:7;54: 13;\n21;53: 17;54:9;75: 12; 43:5,13;47: 1;55:22; Mileson（迈尔森）\n（5） 24;23: 17,22;24: 12; 74: II ;76:21 ;77:9;\n98:6;99:3 67: 10;70: 10;74: 18; 64: 16,20,21 ;82: 17; 28:4;34:3,8;38:22; 83:3;98:20; I07:3;\n108:3;109:16\n大量（2） 75:11;77:16;83:18; 83:6 41: 14;43: 13, 19; 108:3;109:16\n29:21 ;51:24 86: 10;91 :24;95:6; 百万（8） 44: I0;46:7,1 0, 18; 所需的\n（3）\n大声（2） 104: 15;108:5; 109:2 21:2,7;22:4,23; 47:20;54:3;55:\n14,17, I 2:7;32:8;67:5\n17:3;56:10 也许\n（3） 61:21;63:23,24;64:\n1 21 ;89:23;90:2,4,21, 需要\n（1）\n忠诚的\n（1） 12:4;53: 18;99: 1 数百万\n（1） 24;91:6,11,17,20; 15:18\nI\n50:1 意思是（11） 42:12 92: 1,7, 12,20,25;93:4, 谈判\n（1）\nLP\n（1） 35:2;36:22,24; 介意\n（1） 7,9,13,15,18,22;94:5; I 27:25\n73:13 38: I, I,4;48: 10; 53:3 95: 15;96: 14, 16;97:9; 两者皆非\n（1）\n午餐（2）\n99:1,8 52: 16;54: 19;67: I; 最低限度\n（1） 98:21,24;99:9,14,17; I 4:25\n91: 18\n含义\n（2） 106:21\n部长\n（1） 100:5,9,13,19;104:2,\n5,9; 105: 15, 18,21 ,25; 侄子\n（1）\nM 36:13;55:10 84:17 106:6,11,15,18; I 48:20\n侄子们\n（1）\n意指\n（1） 分钟\n（1） 107:7,21 I 48:15\n主要的（2） 22:10 61:12 最多（1） 紧张的\n（9）\n104:9,10 会面（5） 分钟\n（5） 54:9 I 30: 19,20,22;31 :4,8,\n中国大陆\n（1） 4:5;7:3; 16:1;50: I; 9:4;32: 19;39:6; 动议\n（11） 22;36: 16, 18;47: 14\n49:2 107:24 58:19;91:9 5:18;8:18;11:21; 纽约\n（34）\n主要地（1） 会议\n（7） 误读\n（1） 12:16; 13:21 ;23:8; 6: 11;9: 18;17:6,6;\n59:23 27:25;62:4,13; 7:14 25: 15;29:21 ;73: 13; 18:19;23:5;27:3;\n维护\n（3） 83:22,23,25;84:2 虚假陈述\n（6） 108:6,17 34: 15, 18,18,23;49:5,\n61: 18;62:20;81:4 会议\n（1） 7:7;8:8,17,19;9:\n19; 动议\n（3） 8;51: 12,17, 19,21,23;\n作出（2） 58:19 24:25 13:24;16:6,21 52: 1,2;56: 12, 12;\n9: 18;99: I 符合（1） 虚假陈述\n（1） 提出（8） 57: 12;59: I;86: 12, 14,\n作出\n（5） 4:21 8:9 3:2;46: 18, 19;49:5; 19,22;87:3;98:22,24;\n45:5;52: 16,17; 成员\n（5） 缺失（1） 56: 17;70:2;99:2; 106:6,12,22\n66:4;103:14\n渎职\n（1） 18:10,14;48:19;\n105:14,19 95:6\n错误陈述\n（1） 109:21 下一步\n（9）\n5:2 成员\n（2） 28:25 已提出\n（1） 6:5;7: 16;32:24;\n管理\n（2） 18:13;57:16 嘲弄\n（1） 63:18\n正在提出\n（1） 55:25;63: 14;88:24;\n57:8;58:10 备忘录\n（1） 9:14 72:10 89:3;95: 15;97:8\n侄女（2）\n经理\n（3） 70:2 Mom（妈妈）\n（1） 许多\n（4） I 48:15,19\n56:25;57:11,11 记载于\n（1） 51:2 63:24;81 :3;97: 1; 九\n（1）\n管理\n（1） 32:15 时刻\n（2） 103:24 I 57:5\n83:2 记忆\n（3） 30:2;83:17 多媒体\n（1） 吹毛求疵\n（1）\n普通话\n（4） 7: I;30:22;42:23 金钱\n（3） 13:2 I 62:9\n30:25;97: 14, 17,21 提及\n（3） 8:20;33:2;99: 13 多个\n（3） 无人\n（3）\nMannis（曼尼斯）\n（1） 22: 14;38:2;39:23 月份\n（5） 48:25;70:8;94:9 33:4,5;105:2\n65:1 提及\n（4） 50: 10;55: 19,19,20; 必须\n（3） 无人（1）\n\nMin-U-Script@（8） 长—无\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文书编号：331 案号 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 文书 440-15\n提交于 05/25/22 录入于 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 120 页\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） 共 126 页 2019 年 4 月\n26 日\n\n81:5 关闭（9） 机会\n（2） 6:9; 11:17;28: 17, 当事人\n（4）\n正常\n（1） 20:11;24:23;47:10; 16:11;36:10 18,19;29:6,8;34:\n18; I 3:5,18;44:5;90:20\n96:8 55:18,19;57:15; 反对的\n（1） 60:3,14,18;68:\n14; 合伙人\n（1）\n注释（4） 104:3,5,6 5:18 74:4;80:19;81:\n16,17, I 58:7\n2:4,11;30:1;97:13 要约（14） 反对\n（3） 19;96:9; 105:7 部分\n（2）\n已注明\n（1） 6:4;20: 19,24;21 :2, 12:1;23:8;25:15 拥有\n（9） I 18:11;96:6\n59:2 10,13;22:5,12,17,23, 选择权\n（1） 7:25;8:5;27: 11,11; 当事人\n（13）\n注释\n（1） 25;23:23;78:\n12; 8: II 28:23;86: 13;95:8; 9:7,8;20:9;42: 16;\n63:4\n通知（16） 92:23\n已提出\n（5） 口头的（4） 105: 14, 17 47:3;48: 18;49: 16;\n76:17;85:11,16,17, 62:16,16;71:12; 44:2,16;102:6; 所有人\n（12） 50:6,14,20,25;86:\n17,\n19;98: 17,19;104:5,7, 96:14,16 109:12\n命令\n（26） 30:6;79:21 ;80:22; 即席的\n（1） 13:4;46: 14;75:22; 81:8, 10;85: 15;86:2,\n15;88:5,20; 105: 12;\n108:11;109:1 81:18 办公室\n（1） 80: 13;88:7;91 :5; 106: 13 I 31:21\n已通过\n（2）\n已注意到\n（1） 96:2 52:2 98:7; 102:9,25;104:6, 所有权\n（17） I 22:22;47: 16\n通知\n（1） OFFICER\n（9） 7,10,11,23;105:2; 28:6,8;29: 17;30: 15; 护照\n（1）\n70:18 17:9;27: 15;56:24; 106: 18,22,25,25; 32:21 ;39:2;85: 14; I 12:20\n十一月\n（1） 75: 13;76:5;77: 12; 107:2;108:2,15 86:3,12,17,20;105:23 50:17\nI\n20:1 78:9;98:4;99:23 已命令\n（2） 拥有\n（21） Paul（保罗）\n（1）\n号码\n（9） 2: 1;5:23,25; 12:18; 正式的\n（5） 103:19,21 10:20;27: 18;28: 14; I 99:18\n2: 1;5:23,25; 12:18; 53:20;78:8;97:\n12, 命令\n（2） 29:3,9;32: 1;33: 13,21, 暂停\n（4）\n48: 13,16, 16;76:22; 17,21 11:10;102:21 21,24;34: 13,15,18, 4:23;24: 15;56: I;\n91:23 旧的\n（3） 普通的\n（1） 22;86: 13, 13,14; I\n83:19\nI\n号码\n（2） 49:11,12;50:23 32:18 95: 12; 105: 18; 106:2, PAX\n（2）\n91:21,24 O'Melveny（奥美律师事务所）\n（4） 组织\n（1） 7 I\n12:2;73: 13\n0 2:14,15,18;69:1 53:24 支付\n（4）\n一次（2） 最初\n（2） P I 9:2;11:9;62:19;\n102:7;104:13 92:23;99:4 81:4\n反对（4） 一\n（53） Ostrager（奥斯特拉格）\n（2） Pacific（太平洋）\n（1） 支付\n（1）\n14:I0;71: 17;89:21; 4: 18,18,23;5:23; 7:14;25:23 2:2 I 8:22\n94:19 10:18;11:20;13:9; 其他人\n（3） 包裹\n（3） 人们\n（16）\n异议\n（31） 15:I; 18:9,13, 14, 18; 53:23,24;54:2 58:21,21,22 18:6,9;22: 18;27:5,\n23:23;24: 13;26:8;\n27: 13;28:25;32:9; 22:4;24: I, 15;29: 13;\n32:8,13;41: 18;42:2, 否则\n（1）\n108:13 页\n（18） 9;28:2,3;31: 14, 18;\n41 :8;43:20,20,25; 10,11 ;44:5;45:9, 13; 应当\n（1） 20: 17;21 :20;26:6;\n29: 19;31 :25;34:5; 39:23;42:6;48:\n13;\n67:4,4,7;81: 19\n54:3;60:5,20,22; 47: 15;49: I0;50:23; 人们的\n（1）\n62:6;63: II ;66:6; 51: I;55: 14,19, 19,20; 我们自己\n（2） 22,23,24;69:\n17; I 31 :16\n67: 12;68:9;70:7; 62: 15;66: 19;74: 1; 百分比\n（3）\n71: 11;72:9, 18;74:5, 77:4;83:21,22;84:16; 外出\n（12） 92:1 35: 18;36:8;45:4\n14,16,20;78: 15; 85:6,6;96:24;98:8; 4:2; 19:8;44:2; 页\n（2） I\nPerfect\n（1）\n94:14,17,23 100:22;103:19; 47: 12;53:22;68:22; 42:11,12 I\n16:19\n异议\n（13） 104: 10,21;105:5,9, 70:22;85: 19;89:3; 已支付\n（1） 也许\n（1）\n10:12;12:20;15:24; 18,20; 108:5 91: 16;95:3; 100:21 52: 17 I 89:5\n89:7,14,19;90: I; 一日\n（1） 概要\n（1） 文件\n（6） 期间\n（4）。\n92:9;93:24;94:9; 45:24 99:2 28:6,8;30:9;31\n:7; I 61:18;66:1;70:15;\n95:3,19,21 若干\n（2） 州外\n（1） 43:1;90:20 I 80:12\n义务\n（1） 41:18;96:5 93:14 文件\n（11） 伪证\n（1）\n6:19 持续的\n（1） 外部\n（1） 7:12,15;12:1; I 5:16\n取得\n（4） 24:3 45:13 29: 17,21;46:2;69: I,4, 困惑的\n（1）\n22: 10,15;45:8,8 仅（13） 未偿的\n（1） 4;76: 11,15 I 92:3\n避免\n（1） 2:8;31: 19;47:6; 52:21 段落\n（6） 人\n（17）\n108:3 59:20;83:7,8;91:\n14; 超过\n（4） 28:24;54: 15, 17,20, 18:7;19:5;35:17;\n显然地\n（4） 92: 14;93:25;94:3; 41: 18;51:22;57: 10; 21;78:17 42:5,14;47:7;50:\nI;\n22: 17;24:8,14;. 102: 17;105:22;106:3 79:12 父母\n（1） 66:4,21,22;67:2;\n107:22\n占用\n（6） 开庭陈述\n（3）\n3:9;9:4; I00:21 驳回\n（4） 48:15 I 81:6;82: 18,20,21;\n61:23;67: 17,18,24; 经营\n（2） 27: 14;94:21,25;\n95:22 部分\n（6） 84: I0;88: 17\n68:7,18 52:3,5 概述\n（1） 5:24; 16: 10;53: 10,\n12;89:22;96: I 个人的\n（42）\n22: 15, 16,19;26:24;\n发生\n（1） 运营\n（3） 3:16 特定的\n（3） 27:7,21;28:1;29:11;\n96:6 56:24;76:5;78:9 欠付\n（1） 24:1;46:4;61:13 30: 18;31 :20;32:20;\no'clock\n（1） 运作\n（2） 107:5 尤其\n（1） 33:3,11;34: 14;35:3,9,\n99:16 52:15,16 自己的\n（19） 72:3 11,18,22,24;36: I,5,7,\n\nMin-U-Script@（9） 正常—个人的\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 05/08/2019 02:34 PM 案号：652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF 文书编号：331 案号 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 文书 440-15\n提交于 05/25/22 录入于 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 121 页\nNYSCEF 收到日期：05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） 共 126 页 2019 年 4 月\n26 日\n\n13,22;37:6,9,13,15, 2:4,11;17:3;21:16, 较为可取\n(1) 15:23;104:10; 145:14\n20;43:9;49:18;53:18;\n54:8,16,18,22;55:9; 18,21;26:7;40:10;\n56:9;69:17;74:2; 46:19\n优先选择\n(1) 105:5 拉动\n(1)\n62:7;67:18;68:19; 97:12,25 77:1 进行\n(7)\n2:8;16:17;41:19; 45:13\n购买\n(19)\n84:3 质押\n(37) 判决前\n(1) 94:15;100:3;107:25; 8:20;15:3;33:2,8,\n亲自\n(4) 24:4,5,15,19;38:2, 44:17 108:4 11;44:3;57:12;58:4,\n27:22;37:23;61:25; 7,10;41:2,4,22;43:6, 损害\n(2) 程序\n(3) 12;59:7;61:3,14;\n67:24 10;44:9,11,18,21; 108:10,23 9:14;25:20;46:14 62:15;83:23;86:19,\n人员\n(1) 45:1,6,11,18,19;46:3, 受损害\n(1) 程序\n(3) 22;87:7;90:10,13\n108:11 6,11,12,14;47:14; 107:20 9:19;56:2;83:20 已购买\n(11)\n电话\n(1) 68:8,20;72:5;76:\n12; 预先标记\n(1) 程序\n(10) :\n27:22,23;33:10;\n84:1 79:3;101:20,21,23; 76:25 6:7;10:1;57:13; 65:15;67:15;68:13;\n表述\n(1)\n103:10 107:12;108:12\n已质押\n(24) 准备\n(1)\n106:25 58:14;59:13;62:25; 70:12;81:6,13;101:1;\n件\n(1) 7:9,13;24:20; 已准备\n(2) 65:13,16,17;84:13\n出示\n(1) 107:8\n1\n买方\n(4)\n43:1 37:19;39:12,15,20; 9:15;103:15 15:25 8:25;60:17;63:15;\n刺破\n(14) 40:2,5,19;41:21;43:5, 出席\n(2) 专业的\n(2) 64:5\n4:15,15,24;5:7,8,9; 8,8;68:21;69:3;70:6, 90:23;96:12 47:5,6 1\n买方\n(1)\n100:7,16,18,22; 13,17,19,23;101:18; 陈述\n(6) 项目\n(1) 85:5\n102:20,25;103:12,16 105:1,9 13:3,22;16:4;84:3; 42:9 购买\n(1)\nPing（平）\n(1) 质押\n(15) 89:4,22 证明\n(2) 57:18\n17:5 5:23;7:8;24:17,23, (4)\n已陈述 4:19;103:2 买卖\n(1)\n地点\n(3) 25;37:3,16,25;38:5, 12:19;13:5;88:11; 适当\n(2) 87:6\n45:6;104:6;109:2\n已放置\n(1) 15;44:1,6,7;45:16;\n105:3 97:5\n目前\n(1) 15:22;24:9 购买\n(3)\n76:12 质押\n(2) 109:10 财产\n(4)\n58:17;87:4;98:12; 14:2;58:16;64:6\n纯粹\n(1)\n地点\n(1) 37:22;106:24 总统\n(15) 107:23 104:4\n48:25 加\n(3) 6:6;7:18;27:3; 提议\n(1) 声称的\n(2)\n明显地\n(1) 31:13;36:15;67:19 51:16;52:11;56:23; 100:3 60:10,14\n11:7 下午\n(2) 57:24,25;58:1,3;59:1, 提议\n(2) 意图\n(1)\n原告\n(8) 99:24;103:22 22;78:9;90:8;93:\n10 100:18,20 60:3\n2:14,16,18;10:2; 口袋\n(1) 推定\n(1) 专有的\n(9) 目的\n(3)\n102:10,19;103:25;\n107:5 109:8\n要点\n(12) 79:11 62:1;67:20,21; 9:8,10;73:12\n原告\n(16) 5:5;13:25;44:5,5,6; 虚假陈述\n(1)\n107:9 68:6,10,16;70:13;\n88:17,21 目的\n(2)\n13:22;14:13;16:3, 45:9,15,19;47:\n14; 相当\n(1) 预期的\n(2) 12:15;25:8\n依照\n(1)\n10;76:3;78:24;79:6, 95:25;104:14;108:16 12:7 60:16;63:15 1\n45:22\n7;89:6;97:2;100:3,7; 要点\n(1) 先前\n(4) 保护\n(1) 放置\n(25)\n102:1,14,25;109:8 95:19 2:6;28:16,19;52:20 62:20 3:4;4:2;6:2,15;\n原告\n(2) 政治的\n(1) 价格\n(1) 保护\n(1) 13:10;19:11;20:19,\n14:5;98:11 107:10 58:18 102:10 23;24:19;25:2;26:23;\n计划\n(1) 部分\n(5) 首要的\n(2) 自豪\n(1) 41:23;42:20;48:18,\n38:3 21:18,21;92:15; 13:9;84:17 52:24 21;54:12;58:20,21,\n玩\n(10)\n9:5;10:4;11:14,14; 96:20;97:1\n部分\n(6) 主要的\n(1)\n5:17 证明\n(10) 22;62:24;89:20,23,\n13:15;28:4;92:14,16; 12:23;89:7,19; 先前的\n(8) 4:9,10,14,25;5:4,9,\n21;7:15;12:16; 25;91:7;103:15\n放置\n(3)\n93:25;96:20 92:10;93:21;96:22 5:18;11:21;25:6; 100:22 12:11;57:14;79:10\n已玩\n(13) 位置\n(10) 26:18,19;53:9;62:14; 提供\n(8) PX\n(6)\n10:9,17;11:3,19; 42:18;56:22;57:2; 106:22 3:15;13:4;17:13; 19:24;23:17;43:19;\n12:5,9;28:5;91:1; 72:25;88:21;100:6, 优先权\n(2) 59:15;60:13;65:13; 46:24;69:8,12\n\n94:16,22;95:1,14; 14;101:1,8,24 24:7,22 104:12;106:20\n96:23 可能的\n(1) 囚犯\n(1) 已提供\n(11) Q\n1\n玩\n(10) 50:14 107:10 7:20;59:18,19,20;\n90:6;91:5,8,12,13,\n16;92:15;93:16;94:1; 潜在的\n(3)\n4:1;107:12;109:1 概率\n(1)\n3:19 65:14,15;69:13; 质量\n(1)\n96:22 实际的\n(2) 大概\n(4) 78:20;80:4;81:\n1;\n98:18;92:2\n快速\n(3)\n已答辩\n(1) 103:25;104:20 31:23;92:13;96:10; 规定\n(1) 48:2;87:24;95:\n\n100:15 惯例\n(1) 99:9 102:9 迅速地\n(4)\n答辩\n(1) 65:20 问题\n(8) 公众\n(2) 3:3;11:25;53:21;\n24:9 排除\n(1) 4:18;7:10;24:7; 6:1;9:12 73:5\n客套话\n(2) 106:22 104:9;105:6;108:19, 公开地\n(1) 1\n安静地\n(1)\n83:7,8 偏好\n(1) 21,22 8:3 111:25\n请\n(13) 107:22 问题\n(3) 拉\n(1) 退出\n(1)\n\nMin-U-Script@\n\n(10) 亲自 - 退出\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2019 02:34 PM INDEX NO. 652077/2017\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331 Case 22-50073\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵） Doc 440-15\nFiled 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 122\nRECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\nKwok Ho Wan of 126 April\n26, 2019\n\n42:16 18:25;102:1 3:2,9 6:21 裁定\n(1)\n相当\n(5) 休庭\n(2) 记得\n(13) 回应\n(6) 103:4\n33:22;35:3;52:25; 56:5;99:25 5:23;31:4,9,23; 10:7;16:14;46:7; 裁定\n(1)\n91:15;92:12 认识\n(3) 38:7;39:21;42:2,10; 65:8,11;71:10 103:6\n1\n退出\n(1) 15:16;31:16;47:15 43:12;46:25;61:19; 已回应\n(3) 运行\n(1)\n51:24 回忆\n(2) 63:7;84:7 71:15,18;82:9 109:8\n引用\n(1) 21:2;66:13 移除\n(3) 回应\n(5) Russ（拉斯）\n(2)\n11:21 建议\n(1) 98:13;101:21,24 71:6;72:2,4,24; 2:19,22\n90:13 作出\n(1) 86:7\nR 建议\n(1) 98:11 职责\n(3) S\n1\n7:23 续期\n(2) 52:4,7,10\n提出\n(1) 协调\n(1) 108:7,24 责任\n(2) 1\n保障措施\n(4)\n15:23 72:23 Renminbi（人民币）\n(1) 36:7;52:12 :\n6:16,23;61:14,16\n提出\n(2) 记录\n(6) 59:23 负责\n(7) 出售\n(9)\n14:1;102:6 2:5;3:4,7;29:25; 重复\n(1) 8:22;31:19;35:18, 15:2;44:3;75:24,\n而非\n(2) 74:7;95:25 47:1 23,25;36:8;58:11 24;76:7;86:19,22;\n35:4,12 记录\n(2) 已重复\n(1) 有回应性的\n(1) 87:8;104:13\n到达\n(3) 88:4;106:13 8:16 51:6 销售\n(2)\n4:2;19:8;102:24 涂黑\n(1) 书记员\n(2) 其余\n(1) 57:18;105:4\n阅读\n(27) 20:19 99:21,22 101:25 相同\n(7)\n13:8,12,18;15:1,5; 再次直接询问\n(3) 代表\n(2) 结果\n(1) 5:7;6:23;17:25;\n19:7,10;21:7,16,18, 55:16;74:24;84:22 75:6;103:6 61:14 35:15;43:24;73:18;\n21;22:1;26:11,21; 引用\n(5) 陈述\n(2) 披露\n(1) 103:3\n30:5;31:6,12;34:4, 4:22;53:7;84:3,14, 44:25;45:5 109:4 Sarnoff（萨诺夫）\n(24)\n20;38:12;53:14,19; 16 代表\n(1) 审查\n(4)\n69:2,19;72:17,19; 刷新\n(1) 代表\n(3) 2:15,15;56:15;\n89:8 66:13 58:19 42:21;53:14,16; 59:2;60:24;61:4;\n阅读\n(6) 已刷新\n(1) 66:12;69:14;70:3,10;\n7:7;65:25;66:20 34:5,8;41:10; 21:1 被代理\n(1) 71:21;72:1,11,14,20,\n47:12;89:14;97:4 拒绝\n(1) 7:19;79:18;90:12 22;74:10,23;78:15;\n读物\n(2) 32:10 代表\n(1) 3:15;58:12 84:23;85:3;92:\n18;\n12:25;13:6 已拒绝\n(3) 70:5 权利\n(82) 坐\n(1)\n真实的\n(3) 11:17;13:11;32:6 请求\n(6) 3:10;6:2;17:19,25; 62:13\n13:14;16:8;47:6 关于\n(5) 10:8;64:3,24;65:3, 18:16,19,22;19:1,4, 满足\n(1)\n已意识到\n(1) 78:1,2;103:5,15; 9;66:18 17;20:1,4,24;21:3,7, 98:7\n101:20 107:18 已请求\n(5) 9,10,24;22:1,5,7,22, 保存\n(1)\n确实\n(10) 已登记\n(1) 28:2;32:12;33:6, 25;23:4,10,18;25:\n15, 89:5\n9:16;13:16;25:9; 88:12 18;100:9 23;26:4,25;27:11,12, 看见\n(11)\n36:13;42:21,25; 反刍\n(2) 请求\n(3) 19;28:7;29:16;30:15; 7:12;13:10;21:23;\n47:16;87:20,23; 13:23;46:1 66:1,7,10 31:10,22;32:7;33:2,4, 22:11;28:6,8;41:1;\n95:12 重新引入\n(1) 要求\n(4) 10,14;34:13,16;36:7, 46:20,24;59:20;69:4\n理由\n(3) 16:5 5:5;58:21;76:17; 17,21;37:5,16,19,22, 称述\n(9)\n10:22;48:21;98:6 重申\n(1) 80:24 25;40:16,19,24;41:4, 11:23;13:13;21:9;\n理由\n(4) 16:4 要求\n(3) 19;42:23;46:17,21; 26:3;37:1;47:10;\n6:23;49:25;63:7; 驳回\n(1) 3:24;4:25;75:23 47:20;48:16;55:7; 50:18,22;109:20\n103:10 88:13 重新登记\n(1) 62:17;69:6;76:13; 学校\n(2)\n重新上董事会\n(1) 相关的\n(1) 88:8 79:25;84:18;90:24; 49:12;50:2\n65:17 108:5 保留\n(1) 91:21;92:12;93:3,6; 范围界定\n(1)\n回忆\n(24) 获释\n(4) 74:23 94:15;98:5;99:7,11; 10:11\n搜索\n(1)\n32:3;34:1,10,25; 44:21;45:1,6,11 住所\n(9) 100:2,17;103:17; 10:7\n38:17;40:7;42:23; 相关性\n(12) 101:2,18,21; 104:11\n59:9,17;60:16;61:16, 24:13;43:20,24; 104:14;107:9,12,16, 角色\n(3) Searles（西尔斯）\n(40)\n22;62:21;63:21,23; 46:4,8;60:23;62:8, 19;108:13 52:11;57:11,12 2:19,19;23:25;\n64:13,14;66:2,18; 10;68:12;94:9,13,24 居住\n(1) 26:8,11;27:13;28:25;\n68:6 相关的\n(9) Roscalitar（罗斯卡利塔尔）\n(1) 32:9,12,25;41:8,17;\n11:8;12:21;24:24; 93:10 41:2 43:17,24;44:14,23;\n收取\n(2) 25:1;60:6;63:12,13; 大约\n(2) 57:17;63:23 45:4;47:23;48:\n1;\n85:10,11 71:19;95:12 解决\n(1) 规则\n(2) 53:5;54:5;55:2,13;\n已收到\n(11) 依赖\n(2) 16:1 24:23;92:10 89:16,25;90:3;91:2,\n6:4;20:14;49:15; 5:19;7:22 尊重\n(7) 已裁定\n(1) 10,14,18,23;92:22;\n64:25;72:3,12;78:14; 救济\n(2) 24:4;43:25;71:9; 26:10 94:7,13;95:18,24;\n79:3,6,12;80:6 109:13,15 73:1;74:\n15;100:7,25 规则\n(2) 96:13,17,24;97:6\n最近\n(2) 意见\n(2) 谨此\n(1) 68:19;94:6 座位\n(2)\n1\n\nMin-U-Script@ (11) 相当 - 座位\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 440-15 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 123\nRECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/08/2019\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）\nKwok Ho Wan of 126\nApril 26, 2019\n\n56:13;98:4 设定\n(2) 67:21,24;68:4,16,18, 64:16,21,24;65:4,6, 1\n州\n(4)\n\n就座\n(1) 16:6;46:2 19;69:5;75:24;78:6 12;66:4,21,24,24; 117:4;56:9;97:25;\n17:7 七\n(4) 重大\n(4) 67:8;82:4,18;83:5; 98:13\n第二\n(16) 9:4;18:6,7;48:14 8:16;9:22;10:11; 107:16 陈述\n(1)\n4:14,18;5:2;30:18, 若干\n(2) 21:6 儿子的\n(1) 68:7\n24,25;48:2;50:3,4; 3:1;75:10 显著地\n(1) 7:1 陈述\n(6)\n53:17;78:17;83:23; 摇晃\n(1) 99:6 抱歉\n(28)\n96:24;104:18; 26:18,19;30:14;\n31:12 签署\n(1) 20:10,11;36:15,18, 40:18;46:13;50:18\n109:13,16 壳\n(2) 67:19 19;39:13;40:23;51:5, 陈述\n(3)\nSecrecy（保密）\n(1) 8:21;10:19 相似的\n(1) 8,8,8,8;52:9;54:25; 26:24;35:15;37:8\n7:2 Sherry（雪莉）\n(4) 6:23 55:1,1;66:8;68:13; 州\n(3)\n隐藏\n(1) 57:3;81:19,22; 类似地\n(1) 71:14;77:7;85:1,2; 14:16;60:11,18\n98:12 109:24 6:21 91:2;93:8;94:18; 状态\n(1)\n章节\n(2)\nSherry-Netherland（雪莉-内瑟兰）\n(69) 简单的\n(2) 98:23;100:12;101:6 99:1\n96:4,9 6:6,8,15;7:8,11,12, 11:2;43:3 种类\n(2) 步骤\n(2)\n担保\n(1) 17,21;8:5,7,11,19; 单一的\n(1) 59:12;108:7 48:1;55:22\n62:3 15:3;20:20;56:21; 28:6 寻求\n(3) 仍然\n(6)\n担保\n(11) 57:19,21;58:11;59:7; Sister（姐妹）\n(2) 63:19;64:6;86:3 25:24;29:7;30:20;\n6:16;61:17,19; 60:9,13,17,25;61:3,6, 50:12,16 声音\n(2)\n47:15;48:17;103:7\n63:19,24;64:7;67:17, 13;63:10;64:2,5; 嫂子或弟媳\n(2) 13:5;15:15 约定\n(4)\n18;80:24;81:1,3 65:8,11;67:21;68:3, 48:16,20 听起来\n(1) 12:15;44:11,14,15\n看见\n(2) 20;70:19;71:18;72:3, 坐\n(3) 24:12 已约定\n(8)\n9:20;49:23 4,16,24;76:6;78:\n10; 30:21;38:8;39:6 说\n(8) 3:5,18;12:14,18,21,\n寻求\n(3) 79:22;82:9;85:10,16, 位于\n(1) 47:7,24;53:\n19,23; 22;46:6;70:16\n14:17;108:10;\n24,25;86:5,21;87:16; 6:22 60:6;75:20;83:8;89:3 约定\n(1)\n109:9 88:1,4,9,13,16,19; 情况\n(3) 说话\n(3) 46:2\n似乎\n(1) 90:9;93:3;98:\n15,16, 31:24;39:5;50:5 49:1;53:18;54:16 约定\n(2)\n83:11 17;101:2,5,9;104:\n16, 情形\n(1) 说\n(3) 24:2;45:1\n似乎\n(1) 23;106:5,13 65:20 72:13;82:25;83:1 股票\n(3)\n83:14 Sherry-Netherland's（雪莉-内瑟兰的）\n(1) 六\n(3) 花费\n(1) 88:1,7,12\n\n选择（2） 72:23 48:17;49:11;50:23 47:11 停止（1）\n89:19;91:11 Sherry（雪莉）的\n（1） 大小（1） 说话（1） 150:11\n选择\n（1） 88:21 62:3 54:2 停止\n（3）\n94:1 船舶（1） 跳过（1） 已说\n（3） 149:13,22,23\n出售（12） 57:15 59:3 83:5,10;89:17 直接\n（1）\n5:25;11:24;14:3;\n震惊（1） 幻灯片（2） 春季\n（13） 124:25\n18:25;19:17;85:12; 88:5 4:4;28:13 23:5;27:3;42:7; 策略\n（1）\n87:4;98:18;104:15; 短暂\n（4） Sloane（斯隆）（13） 47:2;51:16,19,21,23; 138:3\n106:16;107:18; 3:16;9:3;63:16; 19:1,4,6,8,12,16, 52:1,1,11,22;53:24 街道\n（2）\n108:12 102:22 25;21:8;22:8,11,20, 争吵\n（1） 117:6;56:12\n出售\n（2）\n不久\n（2） 23;64:14 96:19 更强\n（1）\n19:4;58:16 64:6;70:22 小（1） 阶段（1） 19:22\n出售（1） 出示（18） 18:8 103:2 结构\n（4）\n87:5 8:14,16,18,20; 已售（1） 站立\n（5） 16:18;61:6,10;86:12\n发送（2） 9:15;13:14;31:5,9, 55:5 14:9;25:4;32:23; Stuart（斯图尔特）\n（1）\n19:8,11 10;42:11,22;47:13; 销售（2） 55:24;89:1\n感觉（3） 12:15\n60:9;61:12;66:12; 105:14,19 标准\n（9） 研究\n（1）\n96:8;97:1;99:1 71:21;74:3;90:16 已解决（1） 3:17;4:5,21,24,25; 150:3\n敏感\n（1） 显示\n（3） 108:21 5:24;7:3;11:8;65:19 事项（1）\n21:5 6:8;8:1;31:11 某人\n（10） 标准\n（4） 147:10\n已发送（3） 显示\n（4） 13:15;81:13;84:8; 4:24;102:11;103:2, 主题\n（7）\n20:14;59:24;69:5 6:20;43:17;60:17,\n87:25;88:11,12,13; 3 14:18,20;24:2;\n单独\n（3） 18 104:15;105:8;109:17 站立\n（1） 68:11;71:18,19;\n36:20,25;37:2 Shui（水）（1） 不知何故\n（1） 51:2 100:4\n顺序\n（1） 63:7 30:23 凝视\n（1） 提交（3）\n92:6 侧面（1） 某人\n（7） 36:16\n16:21;58:23;89:5\n严重\n（2） 90:1 8:9;20:19,23;64:9; 开始\n（13） 已提交\n（16）\n4:17;26:1 签署（2） 82:3;83:3;84:3 3:11,14;28:2;48:4, 5:17;13:24;15:2;\n已送达（2） 54:13;61:23 有时\n（2） 8;49:5;51:25;52:2, 23:2;25:14,22;41:20;\n69:1;76:11 签名\n（1） 19:15;36:15 22;76:20;89:13;99:5; 43:4;53:15,25;60:2;\n设定（7） 78:7 儿子（24）\n102:12 84:13,16;90:11;\n\n2:7,8;10:20,24;\n65:3;85:18;102:7 已签署\n（12）\n15:4;42:2;54:10; 48:14,19;49:9,10,\n13,21,23;50:23;51:1; 已开始\n（3）\n28:9;48:6;91:\n18 101:4,8\n提交\n（2）\n\nMin-U-Script@（1）\n\n（12）就座－提交\n\n案号 22-50073\nNYSCEF 文件编号 331\nPacific Alliance Asia（太平洋联盟亚洲）诉 文件 440-15\n提交日期 05/25/22 共 126 页 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 124 页\nNYSCEF 接收日期：05/08/2019\n\nKwok Ho Wan（郭文贵） April 26, 2019\n53:9;65:22 （3）\n宣誓 17:2;28:22;32:22; 103:14;107:3 3:6;6:25;10:10;\n教唆\n（1） 26:4;43:5,7 38:20;52:25;56:8; 今日的\n（1）\n31:12\n1\n5:16 转换\n（1） 74:3;97:20 13:22 真实（5）\n传票\n（1） 55:2 作证（1） 一起\n（7） 76:15;97:24;101:2,\n14:6 （6）\n宣誓 15:16 18:9;50:3;57:14; 9,13\n1\n被传唤\n（2） 5:19;28:16;41:21; 作证（8） 58:20,22,22;79:\n10 信托\n（7）\n73:16,17 43:11;44:11;46:10 5:11;6:7,10,24;7:6, 告知（25） 16:25;64:17,19,24;\n随后\n（1） （12）\n已宣誓 16;73:15;95:7 2:6;7:13;8:5,6; 65:6;66:24;81:17\n70:15 17:1,9;25:6;26:18, （2）\n正在作证 10:6;22:11,13,23; 受托人\n（2）\n随后\n（1） 19;27:10;28:19;35:6; 32:23;62:7 33:4,5;36:5;39:4,19, 158:8,9\n59:25 37:8;56:7;97:18,19 （41）\n证言 21,22,23;40:1,4; 真相\n（5）\n成功（1） 5:14;8:2,5;9:4,7,9, 49:20;50:4,12,19; 5:22;23:24;73:23;\n12:17 T 9;13:4;16:18;25:6,7; 65:12;72:16;82:9 95:12;97:23\n成功（1） 26:12,13;28:21;29:1; Tony（托尼）（1） 尝试（13）\n3:19 桌子（3） 32:17;37:11,12; 84:17 10:7;27:5;31:14;\n起诉（1） 21:2;24:23;47:10 54:14;62:10;66:13, 采取（4） 33:6;43:3;46:14;\n73:8 Taiwan（台湾）\n（2） 15;71:17;73:10,21, 2:8;12:1;51:22; 47:7,24;53:22;56:17;\n充分\n（2） ,\n84:6,7 25;74:6,9;79:9; 73:1 73:12;99:2,3\n5:1;100:15 故事（1） 86:25;90:15,18,25; 顶部（3） 正在尝试\n（11）\n（2）\n建议 95:10 93:1;94:9,20;95:4; 6:11;21:15;104:21 3:15;10:13;24:22;\n100:21;108:21 谈话（5） 96:4;101:13;105:6,7 主题（3） 27:8;36:18;47:11,18;\n概述\n（1） 7:4;10:14;13:11; 他们的\n（2） 10:18;11:2;55:2\n73:25 18:24;38:5 45:10,11 Tor（托尔）（1） 50:9;67:11;74:19;\n已概述\n（1） 109:22\n谈过\n（3） 因此\n（3） 97:15 Tsang（曾）\n（1）\n74:11 5:8;11:4,5 93:16;101:12; T-O-R\n（1） j\n82:22\n正在概述\n（2） （7）\n正在交谈 108:6 97:15 转动（3）\n74:6;94:19 27:21;43:2;49:13, （6）\n第三 总计（2） 140:10;89:3;105:17\n太阳（1） 22,23;50:11;53:22 8:11;13:20;45:25; 9:4;18:7 转向\n（1）\n107:3 谈话（1） 50:9;53:17;86:20 完全\n（2） 179:12\n超级\n（6） 24:17 （4）\n虽然 18:9;30:23 两次（2）\n30:19;31:3,7,22; 磁带（12） 32:7;35:6;45:15; （3）\n接触 116:6,21\n36:16;47:13 10:9,17;11:3,19; 86:21 67:5;83:3,3 扭曲（1）\n提供\n（1） 12:9;28:5;49:17; （8）\n认为 （2）\n追踪 124:22\n78:24 91:1;94:16,22;95:1, 4:6,11;12:4,7; 51:10;52:23 二（30）\n支持\n（6） 14 20:18;62:18;91:3; 交易\n（1） 4:15,23;5:22,25;\n4:5,20;23:7;25:14; 任务（1） 108:20 57:17 6:10;7:19,24;10:19,\n40:18;84:4 12:1 数千\n（1） 庭审记录\n（6） 21;13:24;16:6;22:18;\n（2）\n应当 团队（1） 42:12 12:24;13:3;34:4; 28:24;36:20,25;37:1,\n8:25;52:18 52:12 威胁\n（3） 89:6,8;92:21 12;42:11;43:1;46:2;\n据称\n（1） 技术性\n（1） 42:16;49:18;50:7 庭审记录\n（3） 49:25;53:3;78:18,23;\n11:24 31:6 受到威胁\n（1） 12:23,23;13:6 84:24;90:19;95:18;\n最高\n（1） 准备（1） 48:21\n25:23 转让\n（21） 99:15;100:14;104:20\n9:3 三\n（4） 6:25;7:2;64:15,20, 类型（4）\n当然（11） 电话\n（1） 3:18;43:1;67:19; 24;65:2,3,22;66:23; 158:24;59:17;63:9,9\n3:8;5:25;31:17; 83:25 108:11 85:24;86:3,19;87:8, 典型\n（4）\n33:24;35:3,20;52:17, 告知（2） 贯穿\n（1） 12;98:19;101:20; 159:12;63:10,14;\n17;57:15;62:10; 5:22;99:8 9:19 105:4,23;106:3; 74:15\n99:17 十（1） 时间线\n（1） 108:13;109:1 打字\n（1）\n惊讶\n（1） 39:6 62:22 已转让\n（8） 163:9\n109:11 （3）\n租户 次数（3） 85:14;86:17;87:16;\n暂停\n（1） 61:6,9;80:15 3:1;11:16;50:5 88:8,12;95:8;98:15; U\n1\n108:7 （2）\n任期 时机（3） 104:22\n转让\n（3） t\nUllman（乌尔曼）\n（18）\n108:16 （2）\n期限 标题（6） 64:10;82:3;106:23 6:5,5,10,14,24;7:4,\n维持\n（1） 53:1;54:22 56:23;64:10;66:24; 转让\n（2） 6;56:11,16;74:22;\n14:10 （6）\n终止 105:24;106:3,9 104:18;105:3 75:3,7,22;76:15;\n维持\n（10） 41:23;43:6,10,11; 今日（25） 运输\n（1） 77:22;78:16;85:1;\n60:8;67:14;70:9,9, 44:12;46:12 3:15;4:9,19;5:5,10, 17:12\n9;73:2,3;74:8,17,21 条款\n（2） 87:25\n宣誓（2） 12,21;11:14;12:11; （3）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）\n16:15;58:18 13:8,25;14:6;16:3,7; 15:13;19:10,11 翻译 最终\n（5）","key_entities":["Kwok","Je","Guo","Chinese Communist Party","Ho Wan Kwok","CIPA"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":331,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":35801,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-05-25 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-05-25","updated_at":"2026-08-24 00:04:01"}