{"id":"court_ctb_440_19","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":440,"sub_number":19,"doc_type":"EXHIBIT","filed_date":"2022-05-25","title":"EXHIBIT PAX 21 July 21, 2021 Hearing Transcript, *PAX v. Kwok*, Index. No. 652077/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), Dkt. 898","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"# **EXHIBIT PAX 21**\n\nJuly 21, 2021 Hearing Transcript, *PAX v. Kwok*, Index. No. 652077/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.), Dkt. 898\n\n| | | 22-50073 | | |\n|--------|-----|----------------------------|----|--|\n| IN RE: | | Ho Wan Kwok | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | PAX | | 21 | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | 5/25/2022 Admitted in Full | | |\n| | | P.E. | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 2 of 27\n\n> SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK : CIVIL DIV. : PART 61 -----------------------------------------X PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND : L.P., : : Plaintiff, : : - against - : Index No. : 652077/17 KWOK HO WAN, a/k/a KWOK HO, a/k/a GWO : WEN GUI, a/k/a GUO WENGUI, a/k/a GUO : WEN-GUI, a/k/a WAN GUE HAOYUN, a/k/a : MILES KWOK, a/k/a HAOYUN GUO, GENEVER : HOLDINGS CORPORATION, and GENEVER : HOLDINGS LLC, : : Defendants. : **MOTION** -----------------------------------------X VIA TEAMS OFFICIAL ADDRESS: 60 Centre Street New York, New York July 21, 2021 B E F O R E : (Via Teams) HON. BARRY R. OSTRAGER, Justice (Appearances on the following page.) \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ ROBERT PORTAS, R.P.R., C.R.R. SENIOR COURT REPORTER\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 3 of\n\n| | | 27 | |\n|----|---------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|---|\n| | | | 2 |\n| 1 | | | |\n| 2 | | A P P E A R A N C E S : (Via Teams) | |\n| 3 | | O'MELVERY & MYERS, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs | |\n| 4 | | 7 Times Square
New York, N.Y.
10036 | |\n| | | BY:
STUART SARNOFF, ESQ. | |\n| 5 | | EDWARD MOSS, ESQ.
ANTON METLITSKY, ESQ. | |\n| 6 | | | |\n| 7 | | BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant, Miles Kwok | |\n| 8 | | 45 Rockefeller Plaza | |\n| 9 | | New York, N.Y.
10111
BY:
JOHN SIEGAL, ESQ. | |\n| 10 | | MELISSA CARVALHO, ESQ.
ERIA BARROW, ESQ. | |\n| 11 | | PETRILLO, KLEIN & BOXER, LLP | |\n| 12 | | Attorneys for Defendant, Miles Kwok
655 Third Avenue - 22nd Floor | |\n| | | New York, N.Y.
10017 | |\n| 13 | | BY:
GUY PETRILLO, ESQ.
JOSHUA KLEIN, ESQ. | |\n| 14 | | | |\n| 15 | | LAWALL & MITCHELL, LLC
Attorneys for Defendant, | |\n| 16 | | Genever Holdings Corp. and | |\n| 17 | | Genever Holdings, LLC
162 East 64th Street | |\n| 18 | | New York, N.Y.
10065
BY:
AARON A. MITCHELL, ESQ. | |\n| 19 | | CHIESA, SHAHINIAN & GIATOMASI, P.C. | |\n| 20 | | Attorneys for Defendant,
HK International Funds | |\n| | | Investments(USA)Limited | |\n| 21 | | 11 Times Square - 34th Floor
New York, N.Y.
10036 | |\n| 22 | | BY:
LEE VARTAN, ESQ. | |\n| 23 | ALSO PRESENT: | (Via Teams) | |\n| 24 | | UNA MANYEE WILKINSON, | |\n| 25 | | Interpreter of Mandarin | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 4 of 27\n\n3 Robert Portas, RPR, CRR PROCEEDINGS THE COURT: Good afternoon -- or good morning, rather. MR. MOSS: Good morning, Your Honor. MR. SIEGAL: Good morning. MS. CARVALHO: Good morning, Your Honor. THE COURT: Just let me know if all counsel who plan to speak are present and then we can proceed with the motion for contempt. MR. MOSS: For the plaintiff, Your Honor, we're here. It's Edward Moss and my partner, Stuart Sarnoff. Good morning. MR. SIEGAL: For the defendant, Miles Kwok, who is present, I am John Siegel, S-I-E-G-A-L, from Baker, Hostetler, along with my colleagues, Melissa Carvalho and Erica Barrow. Also appearing for Mr.~Kwok is Josh Klein, from the firm of Petrillo, Boxer & Klein. He's Mr.~Kwok's personal counsel. And appearing, a special appearance by nonparty HK International, is Lee Vartan. Also present, Your Honor, is Miss Una Wilkinson who is Mr.~Kwok's translator who will be simultaneously translating so that he can follow the proceedings. THE COURT: All right, let me hear Mr.~Moss on the motion for contempt. After you speak I would like the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 5 of\n\n27\n\n| | 4
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | opportunity to make a statement to Mr.~Kwok who I'm very |\n| 2 | pleased to see paying attention to these proceedings. |\n| 3 | Go ahead, Mr. Moss. |\n| 4 | MR. MOSS:
Thank you, Your Honor.
Nice to see |\n| 5 | everyone. |\n| 6 | So I think this is a relatively straight forward |\n| 7 | issue, Judge.
The Court has already found correctly that |\n| 8 | it has the power to hold Mr.~Kwok in contempt for |\n| 9 | violating the Court's restraining order by moving the |\n| 10 | yacht, Lady May, out of the jurisdiction. |\n| 11 | The Court's order was crystal clear.
Mr.~Kwok |\n| 12 | obviously has the ability to comply with it, and he |\n| 13 | flouted it.
It's not the first time that Mr.~Kwok has |\n| 14 | engaged in this type of behavior. |\n| 15 | But the Court gave Mr.~Kwok a chance, it did not |\n| 16 | hold him in contempt, it said \"If you bring the boat back |\n| 17 | you won't be held in contempt.\"
Presumably the Court |\n| 18 | took Mr.~Kwok's people, including Mr. Siegal, at their |\n| 19 | word that the yacht has to travel in the ordinary course |\n| 20 | to the Bahamas for winter maintenance and gave him till |\n| 21 | mid May of this year to bring it back.
After all, there |\n| 22 | was an affidavit from Captain Heaslop.
He said, \"Right. |\n| 23 | That's when it comes back every year, mid May.\" |\n| 24 | Well, the yacht never came back.
It's mid July |\n| 25 | and we filed this motion, because the time has come to
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 6 of\n\n27\n\n| | 5
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | hold Mr.~Kwok in contempt, to order the fine or whatever |\n| 2 | relief the Court deems appropriate so that Mr.~Kwok will |\n| 3 | be sufficiently motivated to bring the yacht back from |\n| 4 | where it is now.
By the way, not in the Bahamas anymore, |\n| 5 | now it's in Mallorca, Spain. |\n| 6 | So let's just talk -- we haven't had a chance to |\n| 7 | reply, so I'd like to address the opposition.
The |\n| 8 | principal argument on the opposition is that Mr.~Kwok |\n| 9 | does not have the ability to comply with the order |\n| 10 | because he doesn't own the boat.
And the Court has to |\n| 11 | find that he has the ability to comply with the order. |\n| 12 | He doesn't own the boat.
A shell company called |\n| 13 | HK International does.
Well, we've seen this before. |\n| 14 | Rights, Judge?
Mr.~Kwok forming a shell company, putting |\n| 15 | it in somebody else's name, a son, a daughter, a -- an |\n| 16 | employee, to shield the asset.
We don't dispute that on |\n| 17 | paper the shell company owns the boat.
Okay.
But it's |\n| 18 | his boat.
Right?
We all know that. |\n| 19 | Mr.~Kwok says in his opposition that PAX has |\n| 20 | offered no evidence, that's what they say, to demonstrate |\n| 21 | that Mr.~Kwok controls the boat and can comply with the |\n| 22 | order.
Well, you cannot just say in opposition that |\n| 23 | there's no evidence and ignore the evidence that the |\n| 24 | other side put in. |\n| 25 | First, Mr.~Kwok filed a complaint in
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 7 of\n\n27\n\n| | 6
PROCEEDINGS |\n|---|-----------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | September 2020, repeatedly referred to the, quote -- to |\n| 2 | the yacht as, quote, his yacht.
The prayer for relief |\n| 3 | asked the Court in that case to enjoin the defendant from |\n| 4 | appearing in close proximity of plaintiff, including but |\n| 5 | not limited to his home, his place of business or his |\n| 6 | yacht. |\n\nThe complaint cites and thereby incorporates by reference an article entitled, \"Beijing suspected in hacking yacht owned by Chinese billionaire.\" The article says, \"Guo Wengui, who uses the English name Miles Kwok, said several incidents involving his 152-foot yacht, the Lady May, appeared to be part of a Chinese government effort to threaten and intimidate him.\" 7 8 9 10 11 12 13\n\nThis is an article that Mr.~Kwok and his personal counsel in that case, Mr. Mitchell who's representing Geneva here, found and chose to incorporate by reference into their complaint. 14 15 16 17\n\nI don't have to tell you, Judge, that nowhere in that complaint or in that litigation did Mr.~Kwok or Mr. Mitchell ever say, \"Well, we're attaching this article, but it's wrong.\" Right? If he doesn't -- \"Mr.~Kwok doesn't really own the boat. The article's wrong in that respect.\" Of course they don't say that. The second piece of evidence they ignore: Mr.~Kwok's tweets, photos that at the posted on his since 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 8 of\n\n27\n\n| | 7
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | suspended Twitter account, of him on his yacht with his |\n| 2 | own works saying, \"I bought this boat.
I decided to sell |\n| 3 | it, but then I changed my mind because it was so |\n| 4 | important to me.\" |\n| 5 | Those statements, like the September 2020 |\n| 6 | statement, were made after the yacht was in the hands, |\n| 7 | supposedly, of the this HK International entity.
But |\n| 8 | Mr.~Kwok considered it to be his.
All along he |\n| 9 | considered it to be his, the same way he said in his |\n| 10 | complaint.
And if Mr.~Kwok can decide to advertise the |\n| 11 | boat, to sell the boat and then to change his mind and |\n| 12 | not sell it, I submit, Judge, that he can certainly |\n| 13 | comply with the Court's order. |\n| 14 | Third:
Mr. Siegal who represents Mr.~Kwok, not |\n| 15 | HK International, Mr.~Kwok, asked this Court for |\n| 16 | permission if the boat could be moved.
Who was he asking |\n| 17 | for?
He only represents Mr.~Kwok.
The Court said no, |\n| 18 | and the boat was moved anyway. |\n| 19 | There is no question about who instructed |\n| 20 | Mr. Siegal to ask that question.
And if you need more |\n| 21 | evidence, Judge, look what has happened since.
We have a |\n| 22 | restraining order, Mr.~Kwok has not paid a penny still on |\n| 23 | the judgment, Mr. Siegal represented to the Court at the |\n| 24 | November 12 hearing, \"The yacht,\" quote, \"needs to travel |\n| 25 | offshore at some point for a brief period and then come
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 9 of 27\n\n8 PROCEEDINGS back into the United States. And we just wanted to disclose that so there is no thought that this is being secreted or transferred. This is just an ordinary thing that it has to do for licensing purposes.\" Yet, for the first time ever, despite these promises on Mr.~Kwok's behalf by an officer of the court, the yacht is now in Mallorca, Spain. Why do we think it happened that for the first time in history the ordinary course was changed and the boat is in Spain? We know, Judge. I mean, come on. The other side has put in no evidence, no evidence that Mr.~Kwok is not in control of the boat here. The only evidence that they have is a statement by the captain, in addition to the technical ownership on paper, a statement by the captain that he takes directions from an unidentified person at HKI. There's no affidavit from the daughter, Mr.~Kwok's daughter who supposedly controls HKI, there's no affidavit from Mr.~Kwok, there's nothing. In the cases that Mr.~Kwok cites in his brief the defendant makes an actual showing that he can't comply with the order. That's not the case here. There is no showing. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR So we've made our showing, and we believe it's more than sufficient for the Court's factual finding that\n\n24\n\n25\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 10 of\n\n27\n\n| | 9
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | Mr.~Kwok can comply with the restraining order, and, |\n| 2 | therefore, should be held in contempt. |\n| 3 | The fallback argument on the other side is that |\n| 4 | the Court needs to have an evidentiary hearing to make |\n| 5 | this factual finding.
Well, we think we've made our |\n| 6 | showing and that a hearing -- hearing is not necessary. |\n| 7 | But, Your Honor, if the Court wants to have one, that's |\n| 8 | fine with us, we welcome it.
I'm not sure exactly what |\n| 9 | the point is, though, because there's really no |\n| 10 | additional evidence. |\n| 11 | Mr.~Kwok has taken the Fifth, he's not |\n| 12 | responding to our discovery requests, and so he's |\n| 13 | precluded from testifying. |\n| 14 | Mr. Vartan, HK International, he's had a |\n| 15 | subpoena since March, since March.
We've got thirteen |\n| 16 | pages of documents, only a subset of what he's given to |\n| 17 | the Court.
He hasn't even given us all of the documents |\n| 18 | that he gave to the Court.
But what Mr. Vartan did tell |\n| 19 | us is that HK International has no employees, no |\n| 20 | officers, no directors, no bank account, no documents, no |\n| 21 | nothing.
It's not a real company. |\n| 22 | I said, \"Mr. Vartan, where are the documents?\" |\n| 23 | You know what he told me, Judge?
\"Golden Spring |\n| 24 | has them.\" |\n| 25 | I said, \"Mr. Vartan, how do you pay for the fuel
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n# **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 11 of\n\n| NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 | | | 27 | | | RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 | |\n|---------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------|-------------|--|--|-----------------------------|--|\n| | | | | | | 10 | |\n| | | | PROCEEDINGS | | | | |\n| 1 | | and the captain's salary and the -- and the mooring costs | | | | | |\n\n2\n\n3\n\n4\n\nor whatever you do to dock the boat?\"\n\nWhat did Mr. Vartan say? \"Golden Spring pays. Go get the information from him.\"\n\nI went to Mr. Alter. Golden's -- another lawyer on the other side -- Right? -- with Golden Spring. He was ordered -- you remember Mr. Alter, he didn't want to give me a single document relating to Golden Spring. The Court ordered them to comply in May. What have I gotten so far in the last several months? A couple of tax returns. They're fighting me now because he won't give me an org chart. He won't give me an org chart, Judge, which I need to discuss for custodians because he says, \"Well, the -- the identity of my employees is confidential.\" They still haven't given me account statements, and certainly nothing about the boat. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16\n\nSo if we're going to have an evidentiary hearing, which is okay, they have to comply with the discovery so we know what the record is and there are no surprises at the hearing. We need documents and we need the corporate rep depos, depositions. 17 18 19 20 21\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR Finally, the last point and then I'll finish, Judge, that Mr.~Kwok makes here is that because he has appealed the conditional contempt order to the First Department, the Court should defer a ruling on this 22 23 24 25\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 12 of\n\n27\n\n| | 11
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | motion until that appeal shakes out.
But that's |\n| 2 | backwards, Judge.
A final order of contempt here will |\n| 3 | moot the appeal, and then Mr.~Kwok can take his appeal |\n| 4 | from that final order.
The appeal's not going to change |\n| 5 | anything.
First of all, the First Department didn't even |\n| 6 | grant him a stay, so I don't think that the appeal's |\n| 7 | going to change anything.
But the efficient way to |\n| 8 | proceed here is to grant the final order of contempt and |\n| 9 | then to take an appeal from that.
Because if the Judge |\n| 10 | just -- Judge, if you just punt here and wait for the |\n| 11 | appeal on the conditional contempt to be decided, we'll |\n| 12 | just come back here either way and ask you for a final |\n| 13 | order of contempt.
And, so -- |\n| 14 | THE COURT:
Mr. Moss, I understand all of your |\n| 15 | arguments.
Mr. Kwok's motion to stay the entry of a final |\n| 16 | order of civil contempt pending the appeal, I want to hear |\n| 17 | from Mr.~Kwok's counsel on that motion. |\n| 18 | Just so the record is clear, while Mr.~Kwok is |\n| 19 | in attendance, with no obligation whatsoever to speak, |\n| 20 | there have been innumerable proceedings in this case. |\n| 21 | I'll wait for somebody to translate that for |\n| 22 | Mr.~Kwok if he doesn't understand me. |\n| 23 | MR. SIEGAL:
Your Honor, he's got a simultaneous |\n| 24 | translation, so he's following. |\n| 25 | THE COURT:
There's 116-plus-million-dollar
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 13 of\n\n27\n\n| | 12
PROCEEDINGS |\n|---|----------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | judgment against Mr.~Kwok in favor of Mr. Moss' client. |\n| 2 | Earlier this year Mr. Moss sought to levy against the ship, |\n| 3 | Lady May, which was represented to have a value of |\n| 4 | approximately \\$27 million.
At the time that Mr. Moss |\n| 5 | sought to levy against the ship, Lady May, the ship, was in |\n| 6 | the United States.
Representatives of Mr.~Kwok requested |\n| 7 | leave to move the ship, purportedly due to weather |\n| 8 | conditions.
The Court denied that request.
Nevertheless, |\n| 9 | the ship was moved. |\n\nThereafter, because the ship had been moved, in violation of a valid Court order, Mr. Moss' client moved for a conditional order of contempt. And the Court, which was obligated to impose sanctions which are proportional to the value of the asset that was removed from the Court's jurisdiction in violation of the Court's order, imposed a fine of \\$500,000 a day for every day that the ship was not in the United States. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17\n\nIf the ship had been in the United States it would have been Mr. Moss' obligation before levying on the ship to obtain further orders of the Court in order to take possession of the ship and monetize the ship to satisfy the judgment. 18 19 20 21 22\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR It's now July, so the ship has been out of the jurisdiction of this Court for two months. And the sanction for disregarding the Court's order continues to 23 24 25\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 14 of\n\n27\n\n13\n\nPROCEEDINGS rise at the rate of \\$500,000 a day. The sanctions solely due to the failure of the defendant and the entities he apparently controls have now reached essentially the value of the ship. So if the parties can't resolve all issues relating to the ship, Lady May, consensually I'm going to stay these proceedings pending the outcome of the appeal to the Appellate Division. I'm highly confident, but can't be certain, that the Appellate Division will conclude that if Mr.~Kwok and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10\n\nthe entities he controls were ordered not to move the ship from the territorial waters of the United States and the ship was nevertheless removed, that was a contempt of a lawful court order.\n\n11\n\n12\n\n13\n\n14\n\n24\n\n25\n\nSo the penalties continue to run, the judgment remains unsatisfied. I don't believe that Mr. Moss has met -- met his burden on the record that's presently before the Court for a final court order of civil contempt, because there is an issue about the ownership of the ship, although it would seem that Mr. Moss has made more than a prima facie showing that all of these entities that allegedly control the ship are controlled by Mr.~Kwok. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR One way or another Mr. Moss is going to levy on any assets that Mr.~Kwok controls to satisfy the\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 15 of\n\n27\n\n| | 14
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | judgment.
And Mr.~Kwok is proceeding at his own peril by |\n| 2 | orchestrating the voyages of this ship to everywhere and |\n| 3 | anywhere other than the territorial waters of the United |\n| 4 | States. |\n| 5 | That's all I have to say.
I'll hear from |\n| 6 | counsel for Mr.~Kwok. |\n| 7 | MR. SIEGAL:
Your Honor, thank you for your ruling |\n| 8 | and for the finding on the stay motion. |\n| 9 | THE REPORTER:
Who is speaking? |\n| 10 | MR. SIEGAL:
I'm sorry, Mr. Portas.
John Siegal, |\n| 11 | for the defendant. |\n| 12 | We thank you for the ruling on the stay motion, |\n| 13 | as well as the statement that plaintiff has not met its |\n| 14 | burden to -- for a final order of contempt. |\n| 15 | In light of those rulings, I don't want to |\n| 16 | belabor this.
I do want to note, just to make a record, |\n| 17 | that certain statements have been made here that are |\n| 18 | contested. |\n| 19 | The plaintiff submitted to Your Honor a proposed |\n| 20 | order, including a factual finding that the Lady May is, |\n| 21 | quote, \"A major asset owned and controlled by Kwok,\" |\n| 22 | closed quote. |\n| 23 | The record on this motion is entirely clear that |\n| 24 | Mr.~Kwok does not own the Lady May, it's owned by |\n| 25 | HK International, and that he has no interest in
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 16 of 27\n\n15 Robert Portas, RPR, CRR PROCEEDINGS HK International. That leaves the -- leaves the issue of control. And, just for the sake of the record, I want to note several things: First, the complaint that Mr. Moss cited is not a complaint in this action and it's not in the record on this motion. Secondly, unverified third-party articles and postings are not evidence. They're not the sort of factual evidence on which this Court can rule. With regard to the internet posting, that is the only material contained in this motion, Mr. Vartan is here for HK International and has information about the unlikely reliability and inaccuracy of that posting. With respect to the statements that were made about my prior request regarding relocating the boat in these proceedings, Mr. Moss said, quote, \"There is no question who instructed me.\" That was his quote. There is no record as to why I asked or who instructed me, and arguments like, \"There's no question\" or \"Mr. Kwok obviously has the ability to comply,\" are not sufficient to be proffered to this Court, especially when they're made about opposing counsel with no evidence or basis. And there's certainly an inappropriate or insufficient basis on which the Court could rule, which the Court has 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 17 of 27\n\n| | 16
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | recognized this morning.
And we appreciate it. |\n| 2 | So -- so the matter goes to the Appellate |\n| 3 | Division, which we appreciate.
If by any chance it comes |\n| 4 | back here on this conditional order, we've made our |\n| 5 | record.
We think it is the plaintiff's burden to show an |\n| 6 | ability to comply, that the plaintiff has not made that |\n| 7 | ability.
And the Court has really recognized that. |\n| 8 | First, at the first hearing on this motion, the Court |\n| 9 | stated on the record that the boat was, quote, a -- was |\n| 10 | an asset that, quote, \"Mr.~Kwok once claimed to own,\" |\n| 11 | closed quote. |\n| 12 | Discovery was ordered; discovery has established |\n| 13 | that he does not own the boat. |\n| 14 | Today the Court, in its care and caution, has |\n| 15 | stated that the boat is owned, quote -- quote, \"Is owned |\n| 16 | by,\" quote, \"entities he apparently controls,\" closed |\n| 17 | quote.
We appreciate the care the Court has taken to |\n| 18 | note that there is no showing or no basis for a finding |\n| 19 | of control and that assertions of who apparently controls |\n| 20 | the boat are not a sufficient basis. |\n| 21 | And, if and when we are back here, we look |\n| 22 | forward to litigating that.
But, as I say, Your Honor, |\n| 23 | we really appreciate the carefulness and diligence the |\n| 24 | Court is exercising, and we appreciate the ruling today. |\n| 25 | THE COURT:
Let's be clear about -- Let's be clear
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 18 of\n\n| | 27 | |\n|----|--------------------------------------------------------------|-----|\n| | PROCEEDINGS | 17 |\n| 1 | about one thing:
The Court issued an order directing that | |\n| 2 | the boat not be removed from the territorial waters of the | |\n| 3 | United States, upon an application from representatives of | |\n| 4 | Mr.~Kwok, or entities that he controlled, to remove the | |\n| 5 | boat from the territorial waters of the United States. | |\n| 6 | That order was disregarded by Mr.~Kwok and/or the entities | |\n| 7 | that he controls.
That is a contempt of the Court. | And |\n| 8 | that is why the Court, on May 15th, ordered that there be | |\n| 9 | a sanction of \\$500,000 a day for every day that the boat is | |\n| 10 | not within the territorial waters of the United States. | |\n| 11 | So, whatever procedural efforts Mr. Moss put | |\n| 12 | before the Court today have nothing whatsoever to do with | |\n| 13 | the violation of the Court's prior order directing that | |\n| 14 | the boat not be removed from the United States. | |\n| 15 | If this wasn't gamesmanship and this wasn't | |\n| 16 | flaunting of the Court's orders, and if this wasn't a | |\n| 17 | transparent shell game that Mr.~Kwok is engaged in, the | |\n| 18 | boat would be in the territorial waters of the United | |\n\nStates and we would resolve the issue of the boat's ownership.\n\n19\n\n20\n\nMr. Moss has made more than a prima facie showing that Mr.~Kwok controls all of these entities, over the course of multiple hearings, and that Mr.~Kwok is in contempt, and his entities are in contempt of prior orders of the Court. 21 22 23 24 25\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 19 of 27\n\n| | 18
PROCEEDINGS |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| 1 | Now, you've gone to the Appellate Division. |\n| 2 | What is the timetable for the briefing of your appeal? |\n| 3 | MR. SIEGAL:
Your Honor, it's been perfected for |\n| 4 | the September term. |\n| 5 | THE COURT:
All right. |\n| 6 | Well, we'll hear from the Appellate Division |\n| 7 | soon enough.
And, in the meantime, the Defendant Kwok |\n| 8 | has the opportunity to partially purge himself of the |\n| 9 | conditional order of contempt that the Court issued by |\n| 10 | transferring the boat back to the territorial waters of |\n| 11 | the United States. |\n| 12 | And, if Mr.~Kwok and his entities prevail in |\n| 13 | establishing, or, rather, defeating Mr. Moss' prima facie |\n| 14 | showing that Mr.~Kwok absolutely, unequivocally |\n| 15 | positively, definitely controls this boat, then Mr. Moss |\n| 16 | won't be able to levy on the boat. |\n| 17 | MR. SIEGAL:
Your Honor, for the record and the |\n| 18 | sake of completeness:
I made a request for the Court to |\n| 19 | clarify its restraining order as to whether it applied to |\n| 20 | movement of the ship, and the Court clarified that ruling. |\n| 21 | At the time that I made that request, and before the order |\n| 22 | was clarified, and unbeknownst to me, at the time I made |\n| 23 | the request the vessel was no longer in the United States. |\n| 24 | So, that -- I understand the Court's concern |\n| 25 | about this overall situation, I just wanted to clarify
Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 20 of\n\n27\n\n19 Robert Portas, RPR, CRR PROCEEDINGS that sequence for the record. And I'll rest on that. THE COURT: If you choose to -- if you, counsel, choose to be an instrumentality of gamesmanship and defiance of Court orders, that's your decision. MR. SIEGAL: I appreciate the concern, Your Honor. That is certainly not something in which we are engaged, nor would engage. THE COURT: There can't be any dispute that Mr.~Kwok and the entities he controlled were restrained from moving that boat from the territorial waters of the United States. And, in defiance of those orders and subsequent orders, the boat remains outside the territorial waters of the United States. And sooner or later the wheels of justice, which grind exceedingly slowly, will resolve the issue. In the meantime, you have your appeal. And I'll await the outcome of the Appellate Division's ruling. That's the disposition of the application. If there is nothing further, everyone should have a nice day. If there is something further, put it on the record. (Continued on the following page.) oOo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\n#### **FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM** INDEX NO. 652077/2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 21 of\n\n| | 27 |\n|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| | 20
PROCEEDINGS |\n| 1 | MR. SIEGAL:
Thank you, Your Honor. |\n| 2 | MR. MOSS:
Thank you, Your Honor. |\n| 3 | THE COURT:
Have a nice day, everyone. |\n| 4 | Order a copy of the transcript.
It's very |\n| 5 | important that you have a copy of the transcript. |\n| 6 | MR. MOSS:
We will.
Thank you. |\n| 7 | (Whereupon, the above-captioned proceedings |\n| 8 | were concluded.) |\n| 9 | oOo |\n| 10 | (It is hereby certified that the
(foregoing is a true and accurate |\n| 11 | (transcript of the proceedings.
( |\n| 12 | (
(
_________________________ |\n| 13 | (
ROBERT PORTAS, RPR, CRR
(
Senior Court Reporter |\n| 14 | oOo
SO ORDERED July 29, 2021 |\n| 15 | |\n| 16 | |\n| 17 | |\n| 18 | |\n| 19 | |\n| 20 | |\n| 21 | |\n| 22 | |\n| 23 | |\n| 24 | |\n| 25 | |\n| | Robert Portas, RPR, CRR |\n| | |\n\n| \\$ | ALLIANCE [1] 1/3
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM | basis [4] 15/23 15/25 16/18
INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|---------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 440-19
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898 | along [2] 3/14 7/8
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | 16/20
Page 22 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 |\n| \\$27 [1] 12/4
\\$27 million [1] 12/4 | already [1] 4/7
27 | be [20] 3/22 4/17 5/3 6/12 |\n| \\$500,000 [3] 12/16 13/1 17/9 | ALSO [3] 2/23 3/16 3/21
Alter [2] 10/5 10/7 | 7/8 7/9 7/16 9/2 11/11 13/9
15/22 16/25 16/25 17/2 17/8 |\n| | although [1] 13/20 | 17/14 17/18 18/16 19/3 19/8 |\n| - | am [1] 3/13 | because [10] 4/25 5/10 7/3 |\n| -----------------------------------------X [2] | and/or [1] 17/6 | 9/9 10/11 10/13 10/23 11/9 |\n| 1/2 1/10 | another [2] 10/5 13/24 | 12/10 13/19 |\n| | ANTON [1] 2/5 | been [7] 11/20 12/10 12/18 |\n| 1 | any [3] 13/25 16/3 19/8 | 12/19 12/23 14/17 18/3 |\n| 10017 [1] 2/12 | anymore [1] 5/4 | before [5] 5/13 12/19 13/18 |\n| 10036 [2] 2/4 2/21 | anything [2] 11/5 11/7 | 17/12 18/21 |\n| 10065 [1] 2/17 | anyway [1] 7/18 | behalf [1] 8/6 |\n| 10111 [1] 2/8 | anywhere [1] 14/3 | behavior [1] 4/14 |\n| 11 [1] 2/21 | apparently [3] 13/3 16/16 | Beijing [1] 6/8 |\n| 116-plus-million-dollar [1]
11/25 | 16/19 | being [1] 8/2 |\n| 12 [1] 7/24 | appeal [9] 11/1 11/3 11/3
11/9 11/11 11/16 13/7 18/2 | belabor [1] 14/16
believe [2] 8/24 13/16 |\n| 152-foot [1] 6/11 | 19/15 | billionaire [1] 6/9 |\n| 15th [1] 17/8 | appeal's [2] 11/4 11/6 | boat [31] |\n| 162 [1] 2/17 | appealed [1] 10/24 | boat's [1] 17/19 |\n| 17 [1] 1/6 | appearance [1] 3/19 | bought [1] 7/2 |\n| 2 | Appearances [1] 1/18 | BOXER [2] 2/11 3/17 |\n| | appeared [1] 6/12 | brief [2] 7/25 8/20 |\n| 2020 [2] 6/1 7/5 | appearing [3] 3/16 3/19 6/4 | briefing [1] 18/2 |\n| 2021 [1] 1/12 | Appellate [6] 13/8 13/10 16/2 | bring [3] 4/16 4/21 5/3 |\n| 21 [1] 1/12 | 18/1 18/6 19/16 | burden [3] 13/17 14/14 16/5 |\n| 22nd [1] 2/12 | application [2] 17/3 19/18 | business [1] 6/5 |\n| 3 | applied [1] 18/19 | but [12] 4/15 5/17 6/4 6/21 |\n| 34th [1] 2/21 | appreciate [6] 16/1 16/3 | 7/3 7/7 9/7 9/18 11/1 11/7 |\n| | 16/17 16/23 16/24 19/5 | 13/9 16/22 |\n| 4 | appropriate [1] 5/2
approximately [1] 12/4 | C |\n| 45 [1] 2/8 | are [12] 3/7 9/22 10/19 12/13 | C.R.R [1] 1/24 |\n| 6 | 13/22 14/17 15/9 15/21 16/20 | called [1] 5/12 |\n| | 16/21 17/24 19/6 | came [1] 4/24 |\n| 60 [1] 1/11 | argument [2] 5/8 9/3 | can [8] 3/7 3/23 5/21 7/10 |\n| 61 [1] 1/2
64th [1] 2/17 | arguments [2] 11/15 15/20 | 7/12 9/1 11/3 15/10 |\n| 652077/17 [1] 1/6 | article [4] 6/8 6/9 6/14 6/21 | can't [4] 8/21 13/5 13/9 19/8 |\n| 655 [1] 2/12 | article's [1] 6/22 | cannot [1] 5/22 |\n| | articles [1] 15/8
as [6] 6/2 14/13 14/13 15/19 | captain [3] 4/22 8/14 8/15
captain's [1] 10/1 |\n| A | 16/22 18/19 | captioned [1] 20/7 |\n| a/k/a [7] 1/6 1/6 1/7 1/7 1/7 | ASIA [1] 1/3 | care [2] 16/14 16/17 |\n| 1/7 1/8 | ask [2] 7/20 11/12 | carefulness [1] 16/23 |\n| AARON [1] 2/18 | asked [3] 6/3 7/15 15/19 | CARVALHO [2] 2/9 3/14 |\n| ability [6] 4/12 5/9 5/11 | asking [1] 7/16 | case [4] 6/3 6/15 8/22 11/20 |\n| 15/21 16/6 16/7
able [1] 18/16 | assertions [1] 16/19 | cases [1] 8/20 |\n| about [9] 7/19 10/16 13/19 | asset [4] 5/16 12/14 14/21 | caution [1] 16/14 |\n| 15/13 15/16 15/23 16/25 17/1 | 16/10 | Centre [1] 1/11 |\n| 18/25 | assets [1] 13/25 | certain [2] 13/9 14/17
certainly [4] 7/12 10/16 |\n| above [1] 20/7 | at [12] 4/18 6/25 7/23 7/25
8/16 10/20 12/4 13/1 14/1 | 15/24 19/6 |\n| above-captioned [1] 20/7 | 16/8 18/21 18/22 | certified [1] 20/9 |\n| absolutely [1] 18/14 | attaching [1] 6/20 | chance [3] 4/15 5/6 16/3 |\n| account [3] 7/1 9/20 10/15 | attendance [1] 11/19 | change [3] 7/11 11/4 11/7 |\n| accurate [1] 20/10 | attention [1] 4/2 | changed [2] 7/3 8/9 |\n| action [1] 15/6 | Attorneys [5] 2/3 2/7 2/11 | chart [2] 10/12 10/12 |\n| actual [1] 8/21
addition [1] 8/14 | 2/15 2/19 | CHIESA [1] 2/19 |\n| additional [1] 9/10 | Avenue [1] 2/12 | Chinese [2] 6/9 6/12 |\n| address [2] 1/11 5/7 | await [1] 19/16 | choose [2] 19/2 19/3 |\n| advertise [1] 7/10 | B | chose [1] 6/16 |\n| affidavit [3] 4/22 8/17 8/18 | back [10] 4/16 4/21 4/23 4/24 | cited [1] 15/5
cites [2] 6/7 8/20 |\n| after [3] 3/25 4/21 7/6 | 5/3 8/1 11/12 16/4 16/21 | civil [3] 1/2 11/16 13/18 |\n| afternoon [1] 3/1 | 18/10 | claimed [1] 16/10 |\n| against [4] 1/5 12/1 12/2 | backwards [1] 11/2 | clarified [2] 18/20 18/22 |\n| 12/5 | Bahamas [2] 4/20 5/4 | clarify [2] 18/19 18/25 |\n| ahead [1] 4/3 | BAKER [2] 2/7 3/13 | clear [5] 4/11 11/18 14/23 |\n| all [13] 3/6 3/24 4/21 5/18
7/8 9/17 11/5 11/14 13/5 | bank [1] 9/20 | 16/25 16/25 |\n| 13/21 14/5 17/22 18/5 | BARROW [2] 2/10 3/15 | client [2] 12/1 12/11 |\n| allegedly [1] 13/22 | BARRY [1] 1/14 | close [1] 6/4 |\n| | | |\n| | | |\n\n| C | definitely [1] 18/15
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM | everyone [3] 4/5 19/19 20/3
INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 440-19
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898
closed [3] 14/22 16/11 16/16 | demonstrate [1] 5/20
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
denied [1] 12/8 | everywhere [1] 14/2
Page 23 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021
evidence [12] 5/20 5/23 5/23 |\n| colleagues [1] 3/14 | 27
Department [2] 10/25 11/5 | 6/24 7/21 8/11 8/12 8/13 |\n| come [4] 4/25 7/25 8/10 11/12 | depos [1] 10/21 | 9/10 15/9 15/10 15/23 |\n| comes [2] 4/23 16/3 | depositions [1] 10/21 | evidentiary [2] 9/4 10/17 |\n| company [4] 5/12 5/14 5/17 | despite [1] 8/5 | exactly [1] 9/8 |\n| 9/21 | did [4] 4/15 6/19 9/18 10/3 | exceedingly [1] 19/14 |\n| complaint [7] 5/25 6/7 6/17 | didn't [2] 10/7 11/5 | exercising [1] 16/24 |\n| 6/19 7/10 15/5 15/6
completeness [1] 18/18 | diligence [1] 16/23
directing [2] 17/1 17/13 | F |\n| comply [11] 4/12 5/9 5/11 | directions [1] 8/16 | facie [3] 13/21 17/21 18/13 |\n| 5/21 7/13 8/22 9/1 10/9 | directors [1] 9/20 | factual [4] 8/25 9/5 14/20 |\n| 10/18 15/21 16/6 | disclose [1] 8/2 | 15/10 |\n| concern [2] 18/24 19/5 | discovery [4] 9/12 10/19 | failure [1] 13/2 |\n| conclude [1] 13/10
concluded [1] 20/8 | 16/12 16/12
discuss [1] 10/13 | fallback [1] 9/3
far [1] 10/10 |\n| conditional [5] 10/24 11/11 | disposition [1] 19/18 | favor [1] 12/1 |\n| 12/12 16/4 18/9 | dispute [2] 5/16 19/8 | Fifth [1] 9/11 |\n| conditions [1] 12/8 | disregarded [1] 17/6 | fighting [1] 10/11 |\n| confident [1] 13/9 | disregarding [1] 12/25 | filed [2] 4/25 5/25 |\n| confidential [1] 10/15 | DIV [1] 1/2 | final [7] 11/2 11/4 11/8 |\n| consensually [1] 13/6
considered [2] 7/8 7/9 | Division [5] 13/8 13/10 16/3
18/1 18/6 | 11/12 11/15 13/18 14/14
Finally [1] 10/22 |\n| contained [1] 15/12 | Division's [1] 19/16 | find [1] 5/11 |\n| contempt [21] | do [6] 8/4 8/8 9/25 10/2 | finding [5] 8/25 9/5 14/8 |\n| contested [1] 14/18 | 14/16 17/12 | 14/20 16/18 |\n| continue [1] 13/15 | dock [1] 10/2 | fine [3] 5/1 9/8 12/16 |\n| Continued [1] 19/22 | document [1] 10/8 | finish [1] 10/22 |\n| continues [1] 12/25
control [4] 8/12 13/22 15/2 | documents [5] 9/16 9/17 9/20
9/22 10/20 | firm [1] 3/17
first [10] 4/13 5/25 8/5 8/8 |\n| 16/19 | does [4] 5/9 5/13 14/24 16/13 | 10/24 11/5 11/5 15/5 16/8 |\n| controlled [4] 13/22 14/21 | doesn't [5] 5/10 5/12 6/21 | 16/8 |\n| 17/4 19/9 | 6/22 11/22 | flaunting [1] 17/16 |\n| controls [10] 5/21 8/18 13/3 | dollar [1] 11/25 | Floor [2] 2/12 2/21 |\n| 13/11 13/25 16/16 16/19 17/7
17/22 18/15 | don't [6] 5/16 6/18 6/23 11/6
13/16 14/15 | flouted [1] 4/13
follow [1] 3/23 |\n| copy [2] 20/4 20/5 | due [2] 12/7 13/2 | following [3] 1/18 11/24 |\n| Corp [1] 2/16 | E | 19/22 |\n| corporate [1] 10/21 | | foot [1] 6/11 |\n| CORPORATION [1] 1/8 | Earlier [1] 12/2 | foregoing [1] 20/10 |\n| correctly [1] 4/7
costs [1] 10/1 | East [1] 2/17
EDWARD [2] 2/5 3/10 | forming [1] 5/14
forward [2] 4/6 16/22 |\n| could [2] 7/16 15/25 | efficient [1] 11/7 | found [2] 4/7 6/16 |\n| counsel [7] 3/6 3/18 6/15 | effort [1] 6/13 | fuel [1] 9/25 |\n| 11/17 14/6 15/23 19/2 | efforts [1] 17/11 | FUND [1] 1/3 |\n| COUNTY [1] 1/2
couple [1] 10/10 | either [1] 11/12
else's [1] 5/15 | Funds [1] 2/20
further [3] 12/20 19/19 19/20 |\n| course [4] 4/19 6/23 8/9 | employee [1] 5/16 | |\n| 17/23 | employees [2] 9/19 10/14 | G |\n| court [45] | engage [1] 19/7 | game [1] 17/17 |\n| Court's [10] 4/9 4/11 7/13 | engaged [3] 4/14 17/17 19/6 | gamesmanship [2] 17/15 19/3 |\n| 8/25 12/15 12/15 12/25 17/13
17/16 18/24 | English [1] 6/10
enjoin [1] 6/3 | gave [3] 4/15 4/20 9/18
Geneva [1] 6/16 |\n| CRR [1] 20/12 | enough [1] 18/7 | GENEVER [4] 1/8 1/8 2/16 2/16 |\n| crystal [1] 4/11 | entirely [1] 14/23 | get [1] 10/4 |\n| custodians [1] 10/13 | entities [10] 13/3 13/11 | GIATOMASI [1] 2/19 |\n| D | 13/22 16/16 17/4 17/6 17/22 | give [3] 10/8 10/11 10/12
given [3] 9/16 9/17 10/15 |\n| daughter [3] 5/15 8/17 8/17 | 17/24 18/12 19/9
entitled [1] 6/8 | Go [2] 4/3 10/4 |\n| day [7] 12/16 12/16 13/1 17/9 | entity [1] 7/7 | goes [1] 16/2 |\n| 17/9 19/20 20/3 | entry [1] 11/15 | going [5] 10/17 11/4 11/7 |\n| decide [1] 7/10 | ERIA [1] 2/10 | 13/6 13/24 |\n| decided [2] 7/2 11/11 | Erica [1] 3/15 | Golden [4] 9/23 10/3 10/6 |\n| decision [1] 19/4
deems [1] 5/2 | especially [1] 15/22
ESQ [10] 2/4 2/5 2/5 2/9 2/9 | 10/8
Golden's [1] 10/5 |\n| defeating [1] 18/13 | 2/10 2/13 2/13 2/18 2/22 | gone [1] 18/1 |\n| defendant [10] 2/7 2/11 2/15 | essentially [1] 13/4 | good [6] 3/1 3/1 3/3 3/4 3/5 |\n| 2/19 3/12 6/3 8/21 13/3 | established [1] 16/12 | 3/11 |\n| 14/11 18/7
Defendants [1] 1/10 | establishing [1] 18/13
even [2] 9/17 11/5 | got [2] 9/15 11/23
gotten [1] 10/9 |\n| defer [1] 10/25 | ever [2] 6/20 8/5 | government [1] 6/12 |\n| defiance [2] 19/4 19/11 | every [3] 4/23 12/16 17/9 | grant [2] 11/6 11/8 |\n| | | |\n| | | |\n\n| G | in [59]
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM | let's [3] 5/6 16/25 16/25
INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 440-19
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898
grind [1] 19/14 | inaccuracy [1] 15/14
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
inappropriate [1] 15/24 | levy [4] 12/2 12/5 13/24
Page 24 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021
18/16 |\n| GUE [1] 1/7 | 27
incidents [1] 6/11 | levying [1] 12/19 |\n| GUI [2] 1/7 1/7 | including [3] 4/18 6/4 14/20 | licensing [1] 8/4 |\n| GUO [4] 1/7 1/7 1/8 6/10 | incorporate [1] 6/16 | light [1] 14/15 |\n| GUY [1] 2/13 | incorporates [1] 6/7 | like [4] 3/25 5/7 7/5 15/20 |\n| GWO [1] 1/6 | Index [1] 1/5 | limited [2] 2/20 6/5 |\n| H | information [2] 10/4 15/13
innumerable [1] 11/20 | litigating [1] 16/22
litigation [1] 6/19 |\n| hacking [1] 6/9 | instructed [3] 7/19 15/18 | LLC [3] 1/9 2/15 2/16 |\n| had [4] 5/6 9/14 12/10 12/18 | 15/19 | LLP [3] 2/2 2/7 2/11 |\n| hands [1] 7/6 | instrumentality [1] 19/3 | longer [1] 18/23 |\n| HAOYUN [2] 1/7 1/8
happened [2] 7/21 8/8 | insufficient [1] 15/24
interest [1] 14/25 | look [2] 7/21 16/21 |\n| has [32] | International [10] 2/20 3/20 | M |\n| hasn't [1] 9/17 | 5/13 7/7 7/15 9/14 9/19 | made [13] 7/6 8/24 9/5 13/21 |\n| have [20] 5/9 6/18 7/21 8/13 | 14/25 15/1 15/13 | 14/17 15/15 15/23 16/4 16/6 |\n| 9/4 9/7 10/9 10/17 10/18
11/20 12/3 12/19 13/3 14/5 | internet [1] 15/11
Interpreter [1] 2/24 | 17/21 18/18 18/21 18/22
maintenance [1] 4/20 |\n| 14/17 17/12 19/15 19/19 20/3 | intimidate [1] 6/13 | major [1] 14/21 |\n| 20/5 | into [2] 6/17 8/1 | make [3] 4/1 9/4 14/16 |\n| haven't [2] 5/6 10/15 | Investments [1] 2/20 | makes [2] 8/21 10/23 |\n| he [32] | involving [1] 6/11 | Mallorca [2] 5/5 8/7 |\n| he's [7] 3/17 9/11 9/12 9/14
9/16 11/23 11/24 | is [56]
issue [5] 4/7 13/19 15/2 | Mandarin [1] 2/24
MANYEE [1] 2/24 |\n| hear [4] 3/24 11/16 14/5 18/6 | 17/19 19/15 | March [2] 9/15 9/15 |\n| hearing [7] 7/24 9/4 9/6 9/6 | issued [2] 17/1 18/9 | material [1] 15/12 |\n| 10/18 10/20 16/8 | issues [1] 13/5 | matter [1] 16/2 |\n| hearings [1] 17/23
Heaslop [1] 4/22 | it [25] | May [11] 4/10 4/21 4/23 6/12 |\n| held [2] 4/17 9/2 | it's [13] 3/10 4/13 4/24 5/5
5/17 6/21 8/24 9/21 12/23 | 10/9 12/3 12/5 13/6 14/20
14/24 17/8 |\n| here [13] 3/10 6/16 8/13 8/22 | 14/24 15/6 18/3 20/4 | May 15th [1] 17/8 |\n| 10/23 11/2 11/8 11/10 11/12 | its [3] 14/13 16/14 18/19 | me [13] 3/6 3/24 7/4 9/23 |\n| 14/17 15/13 16/4 16/21 | J | 10/8 10/11 10/12 10/12 10/15 |\n| hereby [1] 20/9
highly [1] 13/9 | JOHN [3] 2/9 3/13 14/10 | 11/22 15/18 15/19 18/22
mean [1] 8/10 |\n| him [6] 4/16 4/20 6/13 7/1 | Josh [1] 3/16 | meantime [2] 18/7 19/15 |\n| 10/4 11/6 | JOSHUA [1] 2/13 | MELISSA [2] 2/9 3/14 |\n| himself [1] 18/8 | Judge [12] 4/7 5/14 6/18 7/12 | met [3] 13/17 13/17 14/13 |\n| his [22]
history [1] 8/9 | 7/21 8/10 9/23 10/12 10/23
11/2 11/9 11/10 | METLITSKY [1] 2/5
mid [3] 4/21 4/23 4/24 |\n| HK [10] 2/20 3/20 5/13 7/7 | judgment [5] 7/23 12/1 12/22 | MILES [5] 1/8 2/7 2/11 3/12 |\n| 7/15 9/14 9/19 14/25 15/1 | 13/15 14/1 | 6/10 |\n| 15/13 | July [3] 1/12 4/24 12/23 | million [2] 11/25 12/4 |\n| HK International [2] 14/25
15/1 | jurisdiction [3] 4/10 12/15 | mind [2] 7/3 7/11 |\n| HKI [2] 8/16 8/18 | 12/24
just [12] 3/6 5/6 5/22 8/1 | Miss [1] 3/21
MITCHELL [4] 2/15 2/18 6/15 |\n| HO [2] 1/6 1/6 | 8/3 11/10 11/10 11/12 11/18 | 6/20 |\n| hold [3] 4/8 4/16 5/1 | 14/16 15/3 18/25 | monetize [1] 12/21 |\n| HOLDINGS [4] 1/8 1/9 2/16
2/16 | justice [2] 1/15 19/14 | months [2] 10/10 12/24 |\n| home [1] 6/5 | K | mooring [1] 10/1
moot [1] 11/3 |\n| HON [1] 1/14 | KLEIN [4] 2/11 2/13 3/16 3/17 | more [4] 7/20 8/25 13/21 |\n| Honor [15] 3/3 3/5 3/9 3/21 | know [5] 3/6 5/18 8/10 9/23 | 17/21 |\n| 4/4 9/7 11/23 14/7 14/19
16/22 18/3 18/17 19/5 20/1 | 10/19
KWOK [58] | morning [6] 3/1 3/3 3/4 3/5 |\n| 20/2 | Kwok's [8] 3/17 3/22 4/18 | 3/11 16/1
MOSS [15] 2/5 3/10 3/24 4/3 |\n| HOSTETLER [2] 2/7 3/14 | 6/25 8/6 8/17 11/15 11/17 | 11/14 12/2 12/4 13/16 13/20 |\n| how [1] 9/25 | L | 13/24 15/5 15/17 17/11 17/21 |\n| I | L.P [1] 1/3 | 18/15 |\n| I'd [1] 5/7 | Lady [7] 4/10 6/12 12/3 12/5 | Moss' [4] 12/1 12/11 12/19
18/13 |\n| I'll [5] 10/22 11/21 14/5 | 13/6 14/20 14/24 | motion [13] 1/10 3/8 3/25 |\n| 19/1 19/16 | last [2] 10/10 10/22 | 4/25 11/1 11/15 11/17 14/8 |\n| I'm [5] 4/1 9/8 13/6 13/9
14/10 | later [1] 19/13
LAWALL [1] 2/15 | 14/12 14/23 15/7 15/12 16/8 |\n| identity [1] 10/14 | lawful [1] 13/14 | motivated [1] 5/3
move [2] 12/7 13/11 |\n| if [23] | lawyer [1] 10/5 | moved [5] 7/16 7/18 12/9 |\n| ignore [2] 5/23 6/24 | leave [1] 12/7 | 12/10 12/11 |\n| important [2] 7/4 20/5 | leaves [2] 15/2 15/2 | movement [1] 18/20 |\n| impose [1] 12/13
imposed [1] 12/16 | LEE [2] 2/22 3/20
let [2] 3/6 3/24 | moving [2] 4/9 19/10
Mr [57] |\n| | | |\n| | | |\n\n| M | order [33]
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM | 3/21
INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 440-19
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898
Mr. [32] | ordered [5] 10/7 10/9 13/11
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | presently [1] 13/17
Page 25 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 |\n| Mr. Alter [2] 10/5 10/7 | 16/12 17/8
27
orders [6] 12/20 17/16 17/25 | Presumably [1] 4/17
prevail [1] 18/12 |\n| Mr. Kwok [1] 15/20 | 19/4 19/11 19/12 | prima [3] 13/21 17/21 18/13 |\n| Mr. Mitchell [2] 6/15 6/20 | ordinary [3] 4/19 8/3 8/9 | prima facie [3] 13/21 17/21 |\n| Mr. Moss [12] 4/3 11/14 12/2 | org [2] 10/12 10/12 | 18/13 |\n| 12/4 13/16 13/20 13/24 15/5 | OSTRAGER [1] 1/14 | principal [1] 5/8 |\n| 15/17 17/11 17/21 18/15 | other [5] 5/24 8/11 9/3 10/6 | prior [3] 15/16 17/13 17/24 |\n| Mr. Moss' [4] 12/1 12/11 | 14/3 | procedural [1] 17/11 |\n| 12/19 18/13
Mr. Portas [1] 14/10 | our [4] 8/24 9/5 9/12 16/4
out [3] 4/10 11/1 12/23 | proceed [2] 3/7 11/8
proceeding [1] 14/1 |\n| Mr. Siegal [4] 4/18 7/14 7/20 | outcome [2] 13/7 19/16 | proceedings [7] 3/23 4/2 |\n| 7/23 | outside [1] 19/12 | 11/20 13/7 15/17 20/7 20/10 |\n| Mr. Vartan [6] 9/14 9/18 9/22 | over [1] 17/23 | proffered [1] 15/22 |\n| 9/25 10/3 15/12 | overall [1] 18/25 | promises [1] 8/6 |\n| multiple [1] 17/23 | own [8] 5/10 5/12 6/22 7/2 | proportional [1] 12/14 |\n| my [5] 3/10 3/14 7/3 10/14 | 14/1 14/24 16/10 16/13 | proposed [1] 14/19 |\n| 15/16
MYERS [1] 2/2 | owned [5] 6/9 14/21 14/24 | proximity [1] 6/4 |\n| | 16/15 16/15
ownership [3] 8/14 13/19 | punt [1] 11/10
purge [1] 18/8 |\n| N | 17/20 | purportedly [1] 12/7 |\n| N.Y [5] 2/4 2/8 2/12 2/17 | owns [1] 5/17 | purposes [1] 8/4 |\n| 2/21 | P | put [4] 5/24 8/11 17/11 19/20 |\n| name [2] 5/15 6/10 | | putting [1] 5/14 |\n| necessary [1] 9/6 | P.C [1] 2/19 | Q |\n| need [4] 7/20 10/13 10/20 | PACIFIC [1] 1/3 | |\n| 10/20
needs [2] 7/24 9/4 | page [2] 1/18 19/22
pages [1] 9/16 | question [4] 7/19 7/20 15/18
15/20 |\n| never [1] 4/24 | paid [1] 7/22 | quote [14] 6/1 6/2 7/24 14/21 |\n| nevertheless [2] 12/8 13/13 | paper [2] 5/17 8/15 | 14/22 15/17 15/18 16/9 16/10 |\n| NEW [9] 1/1 1/2 1/12 1/12 2/4 | part [2] 1/2 6/12 | 16/11 16/15 16/15 16/16 |\n| 2/8 2/12 2/17 2/21 | partially [1] 18/8 | 16/17 |\n| nice [3] 4/4 19/19 20/3 | parties [1] 13/5 | R |\n| no [28] | partner [1] 3/10 | |\n| nonparty [1] 3/19
nor [1] 19/7 | party [1] 15/8 | R.P.R [1] 1/24
rate [1] 13/1 |\n| not [31] | PAX [1] 5/19
pay [1] 9/25 | rather [2] 3/2 18/13 |\n| note [3] 14/16 15/3 16/18 | paying [1] 4/2 | reached [1] 13/4 |\n| nothing [5] 8/19 9/21 10/16 | pays [1] 10/3 | real [1] 9/21 |\n| 17/12 19/19 | penalties [1] 13/15 | really [4] 6/22 9/9 16/7 |\n| November [1] 7/24 | pending [2] 11/16 13/7 | 16/23 |\n| November 12 [1] 7/24 | penny [1] 7/22 | recognized [2] 16/1 16/7 |\n| now [7] 5/4 5/5 8/7 10/11
12/23 13/4 18/1 | people [1] 4/18
perfected [1] 18/3 | record [13] 10/19 11/18 13/17
14/16 14/23 15/3 15/6 15/19 |\n| nowhere [1] 6/18 | peril [1] 14/1 | 16/5 16/9 18/17 19/1 19/21 |\n| | period [1] 7/25 | reference [2] 6/8 6/17 |\n| O | permission [1] 7/16 | referred [1] 6/1 |\n| O'MELVERY [1] 2/2 | person [1] 8/16 | regard [1] 15/11 |\n| obligated [1] 12/13 | personal [2] 3/18 6/15 | regarding [1] 15/16 |\n| obligation [2] 11/19 12/19
obtain [1] 12/20 | PETRILLO [3] 2/11 2/13 3/17 | relating [2] 10/8 13/5
relatively [1] 4/6 |\n| obviously [2] 4/12 15/21 | photos [1] 6/25
piece [1] 6/24 | reliability [1] 15/14 |\n| offered [1] 5/20 | place [1] 6/5 | relief [2] 5/2 6/2 |\n| officer [1] 8/6 | plaintiff [6] 1/4 3/9 6/4 | relocating [1] 15/16 |\n| officers [1] 9/20 | 14/13 14/19 16/6 | remains [2] 13/16 19/12 |\n| OFFICIAL [1] 1/11 | plaintiff's [1] 16/5 | remember [1] 10/7 |\n| offshore [1] 7/25 | Plaintiffs [1] 2/3 | remove [1] 17/4 |\n| okay [2] 5/17 10/18
on [32] | plan [1] 3/7 | removed [4] 12/14 13/13 17/2
17/14 |\n| once [1] 16/10 | Plaza [1] 2/8
pleased [1] 4/2 | rep [1] 10/21 |\n| one [3] 9/7 13/24 17/1 | plus [1] 11/25 | repeatedly [1] 6/1 |\n| only [4] 7/17 8/13 9/16 15/12 | point [3] 7/25 9/9 10/22 | reply [1] 5/7 |\n| oOo [3] 19/23 20/9 20/13 | PORTAS [3] 1/24 14/10 20/12 | REPORTER [2] 1/25 20/13 |\n| opportunity [3] 1/3 4/1 18/8 | positively [1] 18/15 | representatives [2] 12/6 17/3 |\n| opposing [1] 15/23 | possession [1] 12/21 | represented [2] 7/23 12/3 |\n| opposition [4] 5/7 5/8 5/19
5/22 | posted [1] 6/25 | representing [1] 6/16
represents [2] 7/14 7/17 |\n| or [17] 3/1 5/1 6/5 6/19 6/19 | posting [2] 15/11 15/14
postings [1] 15/9 | request [5] 12/8 15/16 18/18 |\n| 8/3 10/2 13/24 15/19 15/20 | power [1] 4/8 | 18/21 18/23 |\n| 15/23 15/24 16/18 17/4 17/6 | prayer [1] 6/2 | requested [1] 12/6 |\n| 18/13 19/13 | precluded [1] 9/13 | requests [1] 9/12 |\n| orchestrating [1] 14/2 | present [4] 2/23 3/7 3/13 | resolve [3] 13/5 17/19 19/15 |\n| | | |\n\n| R | so [23]
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM | 10/22 11/3 11/9 18/15
INDEX NO. 652077/2017 |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 440-19
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898
respect [2] 6/23 15/15 | solely [1] 13/2
Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 | there [14] 4/21 7/19 8/2 8/22
Page 26 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 |\n| responding [1] 9/12 | some [1] 7/25
27
somebody [2] 5/15 11/21 | 10/19 11/20 13/19 15/17
15/18 16/18 17/8 19/8 19/19 |\n| rest [1] 19/1 | something [2] 19/6 19/20 | 19/20 |\n| restrained [1] 19/9 | son [1] 5/15 | there's [8] 5/23 8/16 8/18 |\n| restraining [4] 4/9 7/22 9/1 | soon [1] 18/7 | 8/19 9/9 11/25 15/20 15/24 |\n| 18/19 | sooner [1] 19/13 | Thereafter [1] 12/10 |\n| returns [1] 10/11 | sorry [1] 14/10 | thereby [1] 6/7 |\n| right [6] 3/24 4/22 5/18 6/21 | sort [1] 15/9 | therefore [1] 9/2 |\n| 10/6 18/5 | sought [2] 12/2 12/5 | these [6] 4/2 8/5 13/6 13/21 |\n| Rights [1] 5/14 | Spain [3] 5/5 8/7 8/10 | 15/17 17/22 |\n| rise [1] 13/1 | speak [3] 3/7 3/25 11/19 | they [6] 5/20 6/23 6/24 8/13 |\n| ROBERT [2] 1/24 20/12 | speaking [1] 14/9 | 10/15 10/18 |\n| Rockefeller [1] 2/8 | special [1] 3/19 | they're [3] 10/11 15/9 15/22 |\n| RPR [1] 20/12 | Spring [4] 9/23 10/3 10/6 | thing [2] 8/3 17/1 |\n| rule [2] 15/10 15/25
ruling [6] 10/25 14/7 14/12 | 10/8 | things [1] 15/4 |\n| 16/24 18/20 19/17 | Square [2] 2/3 2/21
STATE [1] 1/1 | think [5] 4/6 8/8 9/5 11/6
16/5 |\n| rulings [1] 14/15 | stated [2] 16/9 16/15 | third [3] 2/12 7/14 15/8 |\n| run [1] 13/15 | statement [5] 4/1 7/6 8/13 | third-party [1] 15/8 |\n| | 8/15 14/13 | thirteen [1] 9/15 |\n| S | statements [4] 7/5 10/16 | this [33] |\n| S-I-E-G-A-L [1] 3/13 | 14/17 15/15 | those [3] 7/5 14/15 19/11 |\n| said [8] 4/16 4/22 6/11 7/9 | States [15] 8/1 12/6 12/17 | though [1] 9/9 |\n| 7/17 9/22 9/25 15/17 | 12/18 13/12 14/4 17/3 17/5 | thought [1] 8/2 |\n| sake [2] 15/3 18/18 | 17/10 17/14 17/19 18/11 | threaten [1] 6/13 |\n| salary [1] 10/1 | 18/23 19/11 19/13 | till [1] 4/20 |\n| same [1] 7/9 | stay [5] 11/6 11/15 13/6 14/8 | time [7] 4/13 4/25 8/5 8/9 |\n| sanction [2] 12/25 17/9 | 14/12 | 12/4 18/21 18/22 |\n| sanctions [2] 12/13 13/2 | still [2] 7/22 10/15 | Times [2] 2/3 2/21 |\n| SARNOFF [2] 2/4 3/10 | straight [1] 4/6 | timetable [1] 18/2 |\n| satisfy [2] 12/22 13/25
say [7] 5/20 5/22 6/20 6/23 | Street [2] 1/11 2/17 | today [3] 16/14 16/24 17/12 |\n| 10/3 14/5 16/22 | STUART [2] 2/4 3/10
submit [1] 7/12 | told [1] 9/23
took [1] 4/18 |\n| saying [1] 7/2 | submitted [1] 14/19 | transcript [3] 20/4 20/5 |\n| says [3] 5/19 6/10 10/13 | subpoena [1] 9/15 | 20/10 |\n| second [1] 6/24 | subsequent [1] 19/12 | transferred [1] 8/3 |\n| Secondly [1] 15/8 | subset [1] 9/16 | transferring [1] 18/10 |\n| secreted [1] 8/3 | sufficient [3] 8/25 15/21 | translate [1] 11/21 |\n| see [2] 4/2 4/4 | 16/20 | translating [1] 3/23 |\n| seem [1] 13/20 | sufficiently [1] 5/3 | translation [1] 11/24 |\n| seen [1] 5/13 | supposedly [2] 7/7 8/18 | translator [1] 3/22 |\n| sell [3] 7/2 7/11 7/12 | SUPREME [1] 1/1 | transparent [1] 17/17 |\n| SENIOR [2] 1/25 20/13
September [3] 6/1 7/5 18/4 | sure [1] 9/8 | travel [2] 4/19 7/24 |\n| September 2020 [2] 6/1 7/5 | surprises [1] 10/20 | true [1] 20/10 |\n| sequence [1] 19/1 | suspected [1] 6/8
suspended [1] 7/1 | tweets [1] 6/25
Twitter [1] 7/1 |\n| several [3] 6/11 10/10 15/4 | | two [1] 12/24 |\n| SHAHINIAN [1] 2/19 | T | type [1] 4/14 |\n| shakes [1] 11/1 | take [3] 11/3 11/9 12/21 | |\n| shell [4] 5/12 5/14 5/17 | taken [2] 9/11 16/17 | U |\n| 17/17 | takes [1] 8/15 | UNA [2] 2/24 3/21 |\n| shield [1] 5/16 | talk [1] 5/6 | unbeknownst [1] 18/22 |\n| ship [20] 12/2 12/5 12/5 12/7 | tax [1] 10/10 | understand [3] 11/14 11/22 |\n| 12/9 12/10 12/17 12/18 12/20 | TEAMS [4] 1/10 1/13 2/1 2/23 | 18/24 |\n| 12/21 12/21 12/23 13/4 13/5
13/12 13/13 13/20 13/22 14/2 | technical [1] 8/14 | unequivocally [1] 18/14 |\n| 18/20 | tell [2] 6/18 9/18
term [1] 18/4 | unidentified [1] 8/16
United [15] 8/1 12/6 12/17 |\n| should [3] 9/2 10/25 19/19 | territorial [9] 13/12 14/3 | 12/18 13/12 14/3 17/3 17/5 |\n| show [1] 16/5 | 17/2 17/5 17/10 17/18 18/10 | 17/10 17/14 17/18 18/11 |\n| showing [8] 8/21 8/23 8/24 | 19/10 19/12 | 18/23 19/11 19/13 |\n| 9/6 13/21 16/18 17/22 18/14 | testifying [1] 9/13 | unlikely [1] 15/14 |\n| side [4] 5/24 8/11 9/3 10/6 | than [4] 8/25 13/21 14/3 | unsatisfied [1] 13/16 |\n| SIEGAL [6] 2/9 4/18 7/14 7/20 | 17/21 | until [1] 11/1 |\n| 7/23 14/10 | thank [6] 4/4 14/7 14/12 20/1 | unverified [1] 15/8 |\n| Siegel [1] 3/13 | 20/2 20/6 | upon [1] 17/3 |\n| simultaneous [1] 11/23 | that [105] | us [3] 9/8 9/17 9/19 |\n| simultaneously [1] 3/22 | that's [9] 4/23 5/20 8/22 9/7 | USA [1] 2/20 |\n| since [4] 6/25 7/21 9/15 9/15 | 11/1 13/17 14/5 19/4 19/18 | uses [1] 6/10 |\n| single [1] 10/8
situation [1] 18/25 | their [2] 4/18 6/17 | V |\n| slowly [1] 19/14 | them [2] 9/24 10/9
then [8] 3/7 7/3 7/11 7/25 | valid [1] 12/11 |\n| | | |\n| | | |\n\n| V | FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM
Y | INDEX NO. 652077/2017 | |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|--|\n| Case 22-50073
Doc 440-19
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 898
value [3] 12/3 12/14 13/4 | Filed 05/25/22
Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37
yacht [13] 4/10 4/19 4/24 5/3 | Page 27 of
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/29/2021 | |\n| VARTAN [8] 2/22 3/20 9/14 | 27
6/2 6/2 6/6 6/9 6/11 7/1 7/6 | | |\n| 9/18 9/22 9/25 10/3 15/12 | 7/24 8/7 | | |\n| very [2] 4/1 20/4
vessel [1] 18/23 | year [3] 4/21 4/23 12/2
Yet [1] 8/5 | | |\n| VIA [4] 1/10 1/13 2/1 2/23 | YORK [9] 1/1 1/2 1/12 1/12 | | |\n| violating [1] 4/9 | 2/4 2/8 2/12 2/17 2/21 | | |\n| violation [3] 12/11 12/15
17/13 | you [22]
you've [1] 18/1 | | |\n| voyages [1] 14/2 | your [20] 3/3 3/5 3/9 3/21 | | |\n| W | 4/4 9/7 11/14 11/23 14/7 | | |\n| wait [2] 11/10 11/21 | 14/7 14/19 16/22 18/2 18/3
18/17 19/4 19/5 19/15 20/1 | | |\n| WAN [2] 1/6 1/7 | 20/2 | | |\n| want [5] 10/7 11/16 14/15 | | | |\n| 14/16 15/3
wanted [2] 8/1 18/25 | | | |\n| wants [1] 9/7 | | | |\n| was [23] | | | |\n| wasn't [3] 17/15 17/15 17/16
waters [9] 13/12 14/3 17/2 | | | |\n| 17/5 17/10 17/18 18/10 19/10 | | | |\n| 19/13 | | | |\n| way [5] 5/4 7/9 11/7 11/12
13/24 | | | |\n| we [27] | | | |\n| we'll [2] 11/11 18/6 | | | |\n| we're [3] 3/9 6/20 10/17
we've [5] 5/13 8/24 9/5 9/15 | | | |\n| 16/4 | | | |\n| weather [1] 12/7 | | | |\n| welcome [1] 9/8
well [8] 4/24 5/13 5/22 6/20 | | | |\n| 9/5 10/14 14/13 18/6 | | | |\n| WEN [2] 1/7 1/7 | | | |\n| WEN-GUI [1] 1/7
WENGUI [2] 1/7 6/10 | | | |\n| went [1] 10/5 | | | |\n| were [5] 7/6 13/11 15/15 19/9 | | | |\n| 20/8
what [10] 5/20 7/21 9/8 9/16 | | | |\n| 9/18 9/23 10/3 10/9 10/19 | | | |\n| 18/2
whatever [3] 5/1 10/2 17/11 | | | |\n| whatsoever [2] 11/19 17/12 | | | |\n| wheels [1] 19/14 | | | |\n| when [3] 4/23 15/22 16/21
where [2] 5/4 9/22 | | | |\n| Whereupon [1] 20/7 | | | |\n| whether [1] 18/19 | | | |\n| which [11] 10/13 10/18 12/3
12/13 12/13 15/10 15/25 | | | |\n| 15/25 16/3 19/6 19/14 | | | |\n| while [1] 11/18 | | | |\n| who [14] 3/6 3/12 3/22 3/22
4/1 6/10 7/14 7/16 7/19 8/17 | | | |\n| 14/9 15/18 15/19 16/19 | | | |\n| who's [1] 6/15 | | | |\n| why [3] 8/8 15/19 17/8
WILKINSON [2] 2/24 3/21 | | | |\n| will [6] 3/22 5/2 11/2 13/10 | | | |\n| 19/14 20/6 | | | |\n| winter [1] 4/20
within [1] 17/10 | | | |\n| won't [4] 4/17 10/11 10/12 | | | |\n| 18/16 | | | |\n| word [1] 4/19
works [1] 7/2 | | | |\n| would [6] 3/25 12/19 13/20 | | | |\n| 17/18 17/19 19/7 | | | |\n| wrong [2] 6/21 6/23 | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |","body_zh":"证据附件 PAX 21\n\n2021年7月21日听证会记录，PAX v. Kwok，案号 652077/2017（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）），卷宗编号 898\n\n22-50073\n\n关于：Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）\n\nPAX 21\n\n5/25/2022 全部准予接纳\nP.E.\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 2 页，共 27 页\n\n纽约州最高法院\n纽约县\n民事庭\n第 61 部\n-----------------------------------------X\nPACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业），\n\n原告，\n\n诉 案卷索引号：\n 652077/17\nKWOK HO WAN（郭文贵），又名 KWOK HO，又名 GWO WEN GUI，又名 GUO WENGUI，又名 GUO WEN-GUI，又名 WAN GUE HAOYUN，又名 MILES KWOK，又名 HAOYUN GUO，GENEVER HOLDINGS CORPORATION（Genever 控股公司）及 GENEVER HOLDINGS LLC（Genever 控股有限责任公司），\n\n被告。 动议\n-----------------------------------------X\n通过 Teams\n正式地址：60 Centre Street\nNew York, New York\n2021年7月21日\n\n审判长：\n（通过 Teams）\nHON. BARRY R. OSTRAGER（Barry R. Ostrager 法官），法官\n（出庭人员见下页。）\n____________________________________________________________\nROBERT PORTAS（Robert Portas），R.P.R., C.R.R.\n高级法庭书记员\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 3 页\n\n2 出庭人员：（通过 Teams）\n3 O'MELVERY & MYERS, LLP（O'Melvery & Myers 律师事务所）\n原告代理律师\n4 7 Times Square\nNew York, N.Y.\n\n代理人：\nSTUART SARNOFF（Stuart Sarnoff）律师\n5 EDWARD MOSS（Edward Moss）律师\nANTON METLITSKY（Anton Metlitsky）律师\n\n7 BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP（Baker & Hostetler 律师事务所）\n被告 Miles Kwok（郭文贵）的代理律师\n8 45 Rockefeller Plaza\n9 New York, N.Y.\n\n代理人：\nJOHN SIEGAL（John Siegal）律师\n10 MELISSA CARVALHO（Melissa Carvalho）律师\nERIA BARROW（Eria Barrow）律师\n11 PETRILLO, KLEIN & BOXER, LLP（Petrillo, Klein & Boxer 律师事务所）\n12 被告 Miles Kwok 的代理律师\n655 Third Avenue - 22nd Floor\nNew York, N.Y.\n\n13 代理人：\nGUY PETRILLO（Guy Petrillo）律师\nJOSHUA KLEIN（Joshua Klein）律师\n\n15 LAWALL & MITCHELL, LLC（Lawall & Mitchell 有限责任公司）\n被告的代理律师，\n16 Genever Holdings Corp. 及\n17 Genever Holdings, LLC\n162 East 64th Street\n18 New York, N.Y.\n\n代理人：\nAARON A. MITCHELL（Aaron A. Mitchell）律师\n19 CHIESA, SHAHINIAN & GIATOMASI, P.C.（Chiesa, Shahinian & Giatomasi 律师事务所）\n20 被告的代理律师，\nHK International Funds\nInvestments(USA)Limited（HK 国际基金投资〈美国〉有限公司）\n21 11 Times Square - 34th Floor\nNew York, N.Y.\n\n22 代理人：\nLEE VARTAN（Lee Vartan）律师\n23 另有出席者：（通过 Teams）\n24 UNA MANYEE WILKINSON（Una Manyee Wilkinson），\n25 普通话口译员\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 4 页，共 27 页\n\n3 Robert Portas, RPR, CRR\n庭审程序\n法庭：下午好——或者说，早上好。\n\nMOSS 律师：早上好，法官阁下。\n\nSIEGAL 律师：早上好。\n\nCARVALHO 律师：早上好，法官阁下。\n\n法庭：请告知我所有计划发言的律师是否均已出席，然后我们即可就藐视法庭动议继续进行。\n\nMOSS 律师：法官阁下，原告方已出席。Edward Moss 和我的合伙人 Stuart Sarnoff。早上好。\n\nSIEGAL 律师：代表在场的被告 Miles Kwok，我是来自 Baker, Hostetler 的 John Siegel，拼写为 S-I-E-G-A-L，与我的同事 Melissa Carvalho 和 Erica Barrow 一同出席。代表 Kwok 先生出席的还有 Petrillo, Boxer & Klein 律师事务所的 Josh Klein。他是 Kwok 先生的个人律师。非当事人 HK International 的 Lee Vartan 律师亦特别出席。此外，法官阁下，Una Wilkinson 女士亦在场；她是 Kwok 先生的译员，将进行同声传译，以便他能够了解庭审程序。\n\n法庭：好的，请 Moss 律师就藐视法庭动议陈述。您发言后，我希望有机会向 Kwok 先生发表一项声明；我很高兴看到他正专注于这些庭审程序。请开始，Moss 律师。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 5 页\n\n庭审程序\n\n1 MOSS 律师：\n感谢您，法官阁下。很高兴见到各位。\n\n6 因此，我认为这是一个相对直接的问题，法官。法庭已正确认定，其有权因 Kwok 先生违反法庭的限制令、将游艇 Lady May 移出本司法管辖区，而判定其藐视法庭。\n\n11 法庭的命令极其明确。Kwok 先生显然有能力遵守该命令，但他藐视了该命令。这并非 Kwok 先生首次从事此类行为。\n\n15 但法庭给了 Kwok 先生一次机会，并未判定其藐视法庭；法庭表示：“如果你将船带回来，你就不会被判定藐视法庭。”推定法庭采信了 Kwok 先生一方人员，包括 Siegal 律师所作的陈述，即该游艇必须按通常流程前往巴哈马进行冬季维护，并给予他至本年 5 月中旬将其带回。毕竟，Heaslop 船长提交了一份宣誓书。他说：“是的。它每年都是在那个时候回来，即 5 月中旬。”\n\n24 然而，游艇从未回来。现在已是 7 月中旬，我们提出本动议，因为现在应当判定 Kwok 先生藐视法庭，并命令处以罚款或法庭认为适当的任何救济，以使 Kwok 先生有充分动机将游艇从其目前所在地带回。顺便说一下，它已不再位于巴哈马，而是位于西班牙马略卡岛。\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 6 页\n\n庭审程序\n\n1 那么我们来谈谈——我们尚未有机会答复，因此我想回应反对意见。反对意见的主要论点是，Kwok 先生无能力遵守命令，因为他并不拥有该船。而法庭必须认定他有能力遵守该命令。\n\n12 他不拥有该船。一个名为 HK International 的空壳公司拥有该船。嗯，我们以前见过这种情况。对吧，法官？Kwok 先生设立一个空壳公司，将其置于他人名下，比如儿子、女儿或一名雇员名下，以保护该资产。我们不争议，就书面而言，该空壳公司拥有该船。好的。但这是他的船。对吧？我们都知道这一点。\n\n19 Kwok 先生在其反对意见中称，PAX 没有提供证据——这就是他们所说的——证明 Kwok 先生控制该船并能够遵守命令。然而，你不能仅仅在反对意见中说没有证据，而无视另一方提交的证据。\n\n25 首先，Kwok 先生于 2020年9月 提交了一份起诉状，反复将该游艇称为——引述——他的游艇。救济请求要求该案法庭禁止被告在接近原告之处出现，包括但不限于其住所、营业地点或其游艇附近。\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 7 页\n\n庭审程序\n\n1 该起诉状援引并因此通过援引纳入一篇题为“北京被怀疑参与黑客攻击一名中国亿万富翁拥有的游艇”的文章。该文章称：“使用英文姓名 Miles Kwok 的 Guo Wengui 表示，涉及其 152-foot 游艇 Lady May 的数起事件，似乎是中国政府为威胁和恐吓他所作努力的一部分。”\n\n这是 Kwok 先生及其在该案中的个人律师 Mitchell 先生——其在本案中代表 Geneva——找到并选择通过援引纳入其起诉状的一篇文章。\n\n我无需告诉您，法官，该起诉状或该诉讼中的任何地方，Kwok 先生或 Mitchell 先生都从未说过：“嗯，我们附上这篇文章，但它是错误的。”对吧？如果他不——“Kwok 先生实际上并不拥有该船。文章在这方面是错误的。”他们当然没有这样说。他们无视的第二项证据是：Kwok 先生的推文，即其被暂停的 Twitter 账户上发布的、他在其游艇上的照片，以及他本人所说的话：“我买了这艘船。我决定卖掉它，但后来我改变了主意，因为它对我如此重要。”\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 8 页\n\n庭审程序\n\n1 这些陈述，和 2020年9月 的陈述一样，均是在该游艇据称已由该 HK International 实体持有之后作出的。但 Kwok 先生认为它是他的。他一直认为它是他的，就像他在其起诉状中所称的一样。如果 Kwok 先生能够决定宣传该船、出售该船，然后改变主意不出售，我提交主张，法官，他当然能够遵守法庭命令。\n\n14 第三：代表 Kwok 先生而非 HK International 的 Siegal 律师，即代表 Kwok 先生的 Siegal 律师，曾向本法庭请求准许移动该船。他是为谁提出请求？他仅代表 Kwok 先生。法庭说不准许，但该船仍被移动了。\n\n19 对于是谁指示 Siegal 律师提出该问题，不存在任何疑问。如果您还需要更多证据，法官，请看此后发生的事情。我们有一项限制令，Kwok 先生至今未就该判决支付一分钱，Siegal 律师在 11月12日 听证会上向法庭陈述：“该游艇”——引述——“在某个时候需要短暂出海，然后回到美国。我们只是希望披露这一点，以免有人认为这是在秘密藏匿或转移。这只是其为许可目的而必须做的普通事项。”\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷索引号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 登记日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 9 页，共 27 页\n\n8 庭审程序\n\n然而，尽管法庭工作人员代表 Kwok 先生作出了这些承诺，该游艇现在有史以来第一次位于西班牙马略卡岛。我们为何认为通常流程有史以来第一次被改变，该船位于西班牙？我们知道，法官。我的意思是，拜托。另一方没有提交任何证据，任何证据证明 Kwok 先生在本案中不控制该船。他们唯一的证据，除了书面上的技术性所有权外，是船长的一项陈述，即他听从 HKI 某位身份未明人士的指示。没有 Kwok 先生据称控制 HKI 的女儿的宣誓书，没有 Kwok 先生的宣誓书，什么都没有。在 Kwok 先生于其书面陈述中援引的案件中，被告实际证明其不能遵守命令。本案并非如此。没有任何证明。\n\nRobert Portas, RPR, CRR\n\n因此，我们已经完成了我们的举证，并且我们认为，这远足以支持法庭作出如下事实认定：\n\n郭文贵先生能够遵守该限制令，因此应被认定为藐视法庭。\n\n对方的备选论点是，法院需要举行证据听证会以作出这一事实认定。嗯，我们认为我们已经完成了举证，且无需举行听证会。\n\n但是，法官阁下，如果法院希望举行听证会，我们没有异议，且欢迎举行。我不太确定其目的究竟为何，因为确实没有任何额外证据。\n\n郭文贵先生援引了第五修正案权利，他没有回应我们的证据开示请求，因此被禁止作证。\n\n瓦尔坦先生，HK International（HK国际公司），自三月起就一直持有传票，自三月起。我们取得了十三页文件，仅为其提交给法院文件的一部分。他甚至没有向我们提供其提交给法院的全部文件。但瓦尔坦先生确实告诉我们，HK International没有雇员、没有高级职员、没有董事、没有银行账户、没有文件，什么都没有。这不是真正的公司。\n\n我说：“瓦尔坦先生，文件在哪里？”\n\n您知道他怎么回答我的吗，法官？“Golden Spring（黄金泉）有这些文件。”\n\n我说：“瓦尔坦先生，你们如何支付燃油费、船长薪酬以及——以及系泊费用，或者停靠船只所需的任何费用？”\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n已提交：纽约县书记官 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案号 652077/2017 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 11 of\n\nNYSCEF 文件编号 898 27 NYSCEF 收到：07/29/2021\n\n庭审记录\n\n以及船长薪酬以及——以及系泊费用，或者停靠船只所需的任何费用？”\n\n瓦尔坦先生怎么说？“Golden Spring支付。去向他获取信息。”\n\n我去找了阿尔特先生。Golden Spring方面的另一名律师——对吧？——他被命令履行义务。您还记得阿尔特先生，他不愿向我提供任何与Golden Spring有关的文件。法院于五月命令他们遵守。过去几个月到目前为止，我得到了什么？几份报税表。他们现在正与我争执，因为他不愿提供组织结构图。他不愿提供组织结构图，法官，而我需要该图以讨论文件保管人，因为他说：“嗯，我雇员的身份是保密的。”他们至今仍未向我提供账户对账单，更不用说任何有关该船的信息。\n\n因此，如果我们要举行证据听证会，这没有问题，他们就必须遵守证据开示义务，以便我们知道记录内容，并且听证会上不会出现意外。我们需要文件，也需要公司代表人的证言录取。\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n最后一点，然后我就结束，法官，郭文贵先生在此提出的最后一点是，由于他已向First Department（第一部门）就附条件藐视法庭命令提出上诉，法院应当推迟对此动议作出裁定，直至该上诉尘埃落定。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到：07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 12 of\n\n庭审记录\n\n但这是本末倒置，法官。此处作出最终藐视法庭命令将使该上诉失去意义，随后郭文贵先生可以就该最终命令提起上诉。该上诉不会改变任何事情。首先，第一部门甚至没有批准中止执行，因此我不认为该上诉会改变任何事情。但高效的处理方式是作出最终藐视法庭命令，然后对该命令提起上诉。因为如果法官只是——法官，如果您只是暂缓处理，等待对附条件藐视法庭命令的上诉作出裁决，无论如何我们都会回到这里，请求您作出最终藐视法庭命令。因此——\n\n法院：莫斯先生，我理解你的所有论点。关于郭文贵先生要求在上诉期间暂缓录入最终民事藐视法庭命令的动议，我想听取郭文贵先生律师对该动议的意见。\n\n为使记录明确，虽然郭文贵先生在场，但他绝无任何发言义务，本案已进行过无数次程序。\n\n如果郭文贵先生不理解我所说的话，我会等人向他翻译。\n\n西格尔先生：法官阁下，他有同声传译，因此他正在跟进。\n\n法院：存在一项对郭文贵先生作出的、金额逾116 million dollars的判决书，判决莫斯先生的当事人胜诉。\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到：07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 13 of\n\n庭审记录\n\n今年早些时候，莫斯先生寻求对船舶Lady May（五月花女士号）实施扣押执行，据称该船价值约为$27 million。莫斯先生寻求对Lady May实施扣押执行时，该船位于美国。郭文贵先生的代表以据称天气状况为由，请求准许移动该船。法院驳回了该请求。尽管如此，该船仍被移动。\n\n此后，由于该船被移动，违反了有效的法院命令，莫斯先生的当事人申请作出附条件藐视法庭命令。法院有义务施加与因违反法院命令而被移出法院管辖范围的资产价值相称的制裁，因此对该船不在美国境内的每一天处以$500,000罚款。\n\n如果该船当时位于美国，莫斯先生在对该船实施扣押执行前，有义务取得法院进一步命令，以取得该船的占有并将该船变现，从而满足该判决书。\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n现在已是七月，因此该船已离开本法院管辖范围两个月。因无视法院命令而施加的制裁继续以每天$500,000的速度增加。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到：07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 14 of\n\n庭审记录\n\n仅因被告及其显然控制的实体未履行义务而产生的制裁，目前已基本达到该船的价值。因此，如果各方不能就与Lady May有关的所有问题达成一致解决，我将中止本程序，等待Appellate Division（上诉分庭）上诉结果。我极有信心，但不能确定，上诉分庭将认定，如果郭文贵先生及其控制的实体被命令不得将该船移出美国领海，而该船仍被移走，则该行为构成藐视合法的法院命令。\n\n因此，罚金仍在继续累积，判决书仍未得到清偿。根据目前提交法院的记录，我不认为莫斯先生已就最终民事藐视法庭命令完成其举证责任，因为该船的所有权存在争议，尽管看起来莫斯先生已作出远超过表面证据标准的证明，表明所有这些据称控制该船的实体均受郭文贵先生控制。\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n无论如何，莫斯先生都将对郭文贵先生控制的任何资产实施扣押执行，以清偿该判决书。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到：07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 15 of\n\n庭审记录\n\n郭文贵先生通过安排该船航行至美国领海以外的任何地点，正自行承担风险。\n\n我要说的就是这些。我将听取郭文贵先生律师的意见。\n\n西格尔先生：法官阁下，感谢您的裁定以及对中止执行动议的认定。\n\n书记员：谁在发言？\n\n西格尔先生：抱歉，波塔斯先生。我是代表被告的约翰·西格尔（John Siegal）。\n\n我们感谢您就中止执行动议作出的裁定，以及您所作出的原告未能就最终藐视法庭命令完成其举证责任的说明。\n\n鉴于这些裁定，我不想在此赘述。我确实想指出，仅为载入记录，此处已作出的某些陈述存在争议。\n\n原告向法官阁下提交了一项拟议命令，其中包括一项事实认定，即Lady May，引用原文，“是由Kwok拥有和控制的一项主要资产”，引文结束。\n\n本动议的记录完全清楚地表明，郭文贵先生并不拥有Lady May，该船由HK International拥有，而且他在HK International中不享有任何权益。\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到：07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 16 of 27\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n庭审记录\n\n这就留下了——留下了控制权问题。并且，仅为载入记录，我想指出几件事：第一，莫斯先生援引的起诉状并非本案中的起诉状，也不在本动议的记录中。第二，未经核实的第三方文章和帖子不是证据。它们并非本法院可以据以作出裁定的事实证据。就互联网帖子而言，该帖子是本动议中唯一包含的材料，瓦尔坦先生代表HK International在场，并掌握有关该帖可靠性存疑及不准确的信息。关于就本程序中重新安置船舶所提出的我此前请求而作出的陈述，莫斯先生说，引用原文，“毫无疑问是谁指示我的。”这是他的原话。记录中没有说明我为何提出请求或是谁指示我，而诸如“毫无疑问”或“郭文贵先生显然有能力遵守”等论点，不足以向本法院提出，特别是这些论点是在没有证据或依据的情况下针对对方律师作出的。而且，这显然不是法院可据以作出裁定的适当或充分依据，法院今早已认识到这一点。\n\n已提交：纽约县书记官 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收到：07/29/2021 Case 22-50073 Doc 440-19 Filed 05/25/22 Entered 05/26/22 15:30:37 Page 17 of 27\n\n庭审记录\n\n我们对此表示感谢。\n\n因此——因此，该事项将提交上诉分庭，我们对此表示感谢。如果附条件命令因任何可能回到这里，我们已经完成了记录。我们认为，原告负有证明遵守能力的举证责任，而原告并未证明该能力。法院确实已经认识到这一点。\n\n首先，在就该动议举行的第一次听证会上，法院在记录中陈述，该船，引用原文，是一项——是一项资产，引用原文，“郭文贵先生曾声称拥有的”，引文结束。\n\n法院命令进行证据开示；证据开示已证明他并不拥有该船。\n\n今天，法院以其审慎和谨慎的态度陈述，该船由——引用原文——引用原文，“由他显然控制的实体拥有”，引文结束。我们感谢法院审慎地指出，并无证据证明或依据认定存在控制权，而且有关显然由谁控制该船的主张并非充分依据。\n\n如果以及当我们回到这里时，我们期待就该问题进行诉讼。但如我所言，法官阁下，我们确实感谢法院所采取的审慎和勤勉态度，并感谢今日的裁定。\n\n法院：让我们明确——让我们明确。\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记官） 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收件日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 18 页，共\n\n庭审记录 17\n\n关于一件事：本院应 Kwok先生（郭文贵）的代表或其控制的实体提出的将该船移出美国领海的申请，发布了一项命令，指示不得将该船移出美国领海。Kwok先生和/或其控制的实体无视该命令。此举构成藐视法庭。因此，本院于 May 15th 命令，对该船未处于美国领海的每一日处以 $500,000 的处罚。因此，Moss先生（莫斯）今日向本院提出的任何程序性举措，与违反本院先前关于不得将该船移出美国的命令毫无关系。\n\n如果这不是诉讼策略操弄，不是蔑视本院命令，并且不是 Kwok先生所从事的明显空壳骗局，那么该船本应位于美国领海，我们也就会解决该船所有权的问题。Moss先生在多次听证过程中已作出超过初步证明标准的证明，即 Kwok先生控制所有这些实体，且 Kwok先生及其实体藐视本院先前的命令。21 22 23 24 25\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记官） 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收件日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 19 页，共 27 页\n\n庭审记录\n\n现在，你们已经向上诉分庭提出上诉。你们上诉的书面陈述时间表为何？\n\nSIEGAL先生（西格尔）：法官阁下，上诉材料已完备，可在九月审期审理。\n\n本院：好的。\n\n那么，我们很快就会听到上诉分庭的决定。在此期间，被告 Kwok有机会通过将该船转回美国领海，部分消除本院所发布的附条件藐视法庭命令的效力。\n\n而且，如果 Kwok先生及其实体在确立——或者说，在推翻 Moss先生关于 Kwok先生绝对、明确、肯定且确定地控制该船的初步证明方面胜诉，那么 Moss先生将无法对该船执行扣押。\n\nSIEGAL先生：法官阁下，为记录在案并求完整：我曾请求本院澄清其限制令是否适用于船舶的移动，本院已澄清该裁定。在我提出该请求时，在该命令被澄清之前，并且在我不知情的情况下，于我提出该请求时，该船已不再位于美国。因此——我理解本院对整体情况的关切；我只是希望为记录在案而澄清该顺序。\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记官） 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收件日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 20 页，共\n\n19 Robert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR 庭审记录：该顺序。我就此陈述完毕。\n\n本院：如果你选择——如果你，律师，选择成为操弄诉讼策略和抗拒本院命令的工具，那是你的决定。\n\nSIEGAL先生：我理解本院的关切，法官阁下。我们当然没有从事、也不会从事此类行为。\n\n本院：毫无争议的是，Kwok先生及其控制的实体被限制不得将该船移出美国领海。该船违反那些命令及后续命令，仍然位于美国领海之外。正义之轮虽转得极慢，但迟早会解决这个问题。在此期间，你有你的上诉。我将等待上诉分庭裁定的结果。这就是对该申请的处理决定。如果没有其他事项，祝各位今日愉快。如果有其他事项，请记录在案。\n\n（续下页。）\n\noOo\n\n1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记官） 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 案卷编号 652077/2017 NYSCEF 文件编号 898 NYSCEF 收件日期：07/29/2021 案件 22-50073 文件 440-19 提交日期 05/25/22 录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 第 21 页，共\n\n庭审记录\n\nSIEGAL先生：谢谢您，法官阁下。\n\nMOSS先生：谢谢您，法官阁下。\n\n本院：祝各位今日愉快。\n\n订购一份庭审笔录副本。你们持有一份庭审笔录副本非常重要。\n\nMOSS先生：我们会的。谢谢。\n\n（至此，上述庭审程序结束。）\n\noOo\n\n特此证明，前述内容为庭审程序的真实准确笔录。\n\nROBERT PORTAS（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n高级法庭记录员\n\noOo\n\n法院命令如上 July 29, 2021\n\nRobert Portas（罗伯特·波塔斯），RPR，CRR\n\n$ ALLIANCE（联盟） [1] 1/3\n\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记官） 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 依据 [4] 15/23 15/25 16/18\n案卷编号 652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\n文件 440-19\nNYSCEF 文件编号 898 随同 [2] 3/14 7/8\n提交日期 05/25/22\n录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 16/20\n第 22 页，共\nNYSCEF 收件日期：07/29/2021\n$27 [1] 12/4\n$27 million [1] 12/4 已经 [1] 4/7\n27 是 [20] 3/22 4/17 5/3 6/12\n$500,000 [3] 12/16 13/1 17/9 也 [3] 2/23 3/16 3/21\n变更 [2] 10/5 10/7 7/8 7/9 7/16 9/2 11/11 13/9\n15/22 16/25 16/25 17/2 17/8\n尽管 [1] 13/20 17/14 17/18 18/16 19/3 19/8\n- 是 [1] 3/13 因为 [10] 4/25 5/10 7/3\n-----------------------------------------X [2] 和/或 [1] 17/6 9/9 10/11 10/13 10/23 11/9\n1/2 1/10 另一个 [2] 10/5 13/24 12/10 13/19\nANTON [1] 2/5 已经 [7] 11/20 12/10 12/18\n1 任何 [3] 13/25 16/3 19/8 12/19 12/23 14/17 18/3\n10017 [1] 2/12 不再 [1] 5/4 之前 [5] 5/13 12/19 13/18\n10036 [2] 2/4 2/21 任何事物 [2] 11/5 11/7 17/12 18/21\n10065 [1] 2/17 无论如何 [1] 7/18 代表 [1] 8/6\n10111 [1] 2/8 显然 [3] 13/3 16/16 行为 [1] 4/14\n11 [1] 2/21 上诉 [9] 11/1 11/3 11/3\n11/9 11/11 11/16 13/7 18/2 北京 [1] 6/8\n116-plus-million-dollar [1]\n11/25 16/19 正在 [1] 8/2\n12 [1] 7/24 上诉 [9] 11/1 11/3 11/3\n11/9 11/11 11/16 13/7 18/2 详述 [1] 14/16\n相信 [2] 8/24 13/16\n152-foot [1] 6/11 19/15 亿万富翁 [1] 6/9\n15th [1] 17/8 上诉的 [2] 11/4 11/6 船 [31]\n162 [1] 2/17 已上诉 [1] 10/24 船的 [1] 17/19\n17 [1] 1/6 出庭 [1] 3/19 购买 [1] 7/2\n2 出庭人员 [1] 1/18 BOXER [2] 2/11 3/17\n已出庭 [1] 6/12 书面陈述 [2] 7/25 8/20\n2020 [2] 6/1 7/5 出庭 [3] 3/16 3/19 6/4 书面陈述 [1] 18/2\n2021 [1] 1/12 上诉分庭 [6] 13/8 13/10 16/2 提出 [3] 4/16 4/21 5/3\n21 [1] 1/12 18/1 18/6 19/16 负担 [3] 13/17 14/14 16/5\n22nd [1] 2/12 申请 [2] 17/3 19/18 业务 [1] 6/5\n3 适用 [1] 18/19 但是 [12] 4/15 5/17 6/4 6/21\n34th [1] 2/21 理解 [6] 16/1 16/3 7/3 7/7 9/7 9/18 11/1 11/7\n16/17 16/23 16/24 19/5 13/9 16/22\n4 适当 [1] 5/2\n大约 [1] 12/4 是 [12] 3/7 9/22 10/19 12/13 C\n45 [1] 2/8 13/22 14/17 15/9 15/21 16/20 C.R.R [1] 1/24\n6 16/21 17/24 19/6 称为 [1] 5/12\n60 [1] 1/11 论点 [2] 5/8 9/3 来到 [1] 4/24\n61 [1] 1/2\n64th [1] 2/17 论点 [2] 11/15 15/20 可以 [8] 3/7 3/23 5/21 7/10\n652077/17 [1] 1/6 条款 [4] 6/8 6/9 6/14 6/21 7/12 9/1 11/3 15/10\n655 [1] 2/12 条款的 [1] 6/22 不能 [4] 8/21 13/5 13/9 19/8\n条款 [1] 15/8\n作为 [6] 6/2 14/13 14/13 15/19 船长 [3] 4/22 8/14 8/15\n船长的 [1] 10/1\nA 16/22 18/19 标题所示 [1] 20/7\na/k/a [7] 1/6 1/6 1/7 1/7 1/7 ASIA [1] 1/3 关心 [2] 16/14 16/17\n1/7 1/8 询问 [2] 7/20 11/12 谨慎 [1] 16/23\nAARON [1] 2/18 询问过 [3] 6/3 7/15 15/19 CARVALHO [2] 2/9 3/14\n能力 [6] 4/12 5/9 5/11 询问 [1] 7/16 案件 [4] 6/3 6/15 8/22 11/20\n15/21 16/6 16/7\n能够 [1] 18/16 主张 [1] 16/19 案件 [1] 8/20\n绝对地 [1] 18/14 资产 [4] 5/16 12/14 14/21 谨慎 [1] 16/14\n以上 [1] 20/7 16/10 Centre [1] 1/11\n上述标题所示 [1] 20/7 资产 [1] 13/25 某些 [2] 13/9 14/17\n当然 [4] 7/12 10/16\n准确 [1] 20/10 于 [12] 4/18 6/25 7/23 7/25\n行动 [1] 15/6 附加 [1] 8/14 15/24 19/6\n实际 [1] 8/21\n此外 [1] 8/14 2/15 2/19 证明 [1] 20/9\n地址 [2] 1/11 5/7 等待 [1] 19/16 选择 [2] 19/2 19/3\n做广告 [1] 7/10 B 选择了 [1] 6/16\n宣誓书 [3] 4/22 8/17 8/18 返回 [10] 4/16 4/21 4/23 4/24 引用 [1] 15/5\n引用 [2] 6/7 8/20\n之后 [3] 3/25 4/21 7/6 5/3 8/1 11/12 16/4 16/21 民事 [3] 1/2 11/16 13/18\n下午 [1] 3/1 18/10 声称 [1] 16/10\n针对 [4] 1/5 12/1 12/2 倒退 [1] 11/2 澄清 [2] 18/20 18/22\n12/5 Bahamas [2] 4/20 5/4 澄清 [2] 18/19 18/25\n前进 [1] 4/3 BAKER [2] 2/7 3/13 清楚 [5] 4/11 11/18 14/23\n全部 [13] 3/6 3/24 4/21 5/18\n7/8 9/17 11/5 11/14 13/5 银行 [1] 9/20 16/25 16/25\n13/21 14/5 17/22 18/5 BARROW [2] 2/10 3/15 客户 [2] 12/1 12/11\n据称 [1] 13/22 BARRY [1] 1/14 结束 [1] 6/4\n\nC 肯定地 [1] 18/15\n已提交：NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK（纽约县书记官） 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 每个人 [3] 4/5 19/19 20/3\n案卷编号 652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\n文档 440-19\nNYSCEF 文档编号 898\n已结案 [3] 14/22 16/11 16/16 证明 [1] 5/20\n提交日期 05/25/22\n录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37\n驳回 [1] 12/8 各处 [1] 14/2\n第 23 页，共 27 页\nNYSCEF 收讫：07/29/2021\n证据 [12] 5/20 5/23 5/23\n同事 [1] 3/14 27\n部门 [2] 10/25 11/5 6/24 7/21 8/11 8/12 8/13\n来 [4] 4/25 7/25 8/10 11/12 证词记录 [1] 10/21 9/10 15/9 15/10 15/23\n到来 [2] 4/23 16/3 证词记录 [1] 10/21 证据性 [2] 9/4 10/17\n公司 [4] 5/12 5/14 5/17 尽管 [1] 8/5 确切地 [1] 9/8\n9/21 作出 [4] 4/15 6/19 9/18 10/3 极其 [1] 19/14\n诉状 [7] 5/25 6/7 6/17 没有 [2] 10/7 11/5 行使 [1] 16/24\n6/19 7/10 15/5 15/6\n完整性 [1] 18/18 勤勉 [1] 16/23\n指示 [2] 17/1 17/13 F\n遵守 [11] 4/12 5/9 5/11 指示 [1] 8/16 初步表面成立 [3] 13/21 17/21 18/13\n5/21 7/13 8/22 9/1 10/9 董事 [1] 9/20 事实性 [4] 8/25 9/5 14/20\n10/18 15/21 16/6 披露 [1] 8/2 15/10\n关切 [2] 18/24 19/5 证据开示 [4] 9/12 10/19 未履行 [1] 13/2\n得出结论 [1] 13/10\n已得出结论 [1] 20/8 16/12 16/12\n讨论 [1] 10/13 后备方案 [1] 9/3\n远 [1] 10/10\n附条件的 [5] 10/24 11/11 处置 [1] 19/18 有利于 [1] 12/1\n12/12 16/4 18/9 争议 [2] 5/16 19/8 第五 [1] 9/11\n条件 [1] 12/8 不予理会 [1] 17/6 对抗 [1] 10/11\n确信 [1] 13/9 无视 [1] 12/25 已提交 [2] 4/25 5/25\n保密的 [1] 10/15 DIV [1] 1/2 最终 [7] 11/2 11/4 11/8\n协商一致地 [1] 13/6\n已审议 [2] 7/8 7/9 部门 [5] 13/8 13/10 16/3\n18/1 18/6 11/12 11/15 13/18 14/14\n最后 [1] 10/22\n包含 [1] 15/12 部门的 [1] 19/16 查明 [1] 5/11\n藐视法庭 [21] 做 [6] 8/4 8/8 9/25 10/2 认定 [5] 8/25 9/5 14/8\n有争议的 [1] 14/18 14/16 17/12 14/20 16/18\n继续 [1] 13/15 码头 [1] 10/2 罚款 [3] 5/1 9/8 12/16\n继续 [1] 19/22 文件 [1] 10/8 完成 [1] 10/22\n继续 [1] 12/25\n控制 [4] 8/12 13/22 15/2 文件 [5] 9/16 9/17 9/20\n9/22 10/20 律师事务所 [1] 3/17\n首先 [10] 4/13 5/25 8/5 8/8\n16/19 是否 [4] 5/9 5/13 14/24 16/13 10/24 11/5 11/5 15/5 16/8\n受控制的 [4] 13/22 14/21 不是 [5] 5/10 5/12 6/21 16/8\n17/4 19/9 6/22 11/22 公然蔑视 [1] 17/16\n控制 [10] 5/21 8/18 13/3 美元 [1] 11/25 楼层 [2] 2/12 2/21\n13/11 13/25 16/16 16/19 17/7\n17/22 18/15 不要 [6] 5/16 6/18 6/23 11/6\n13/16 14/15 公然违抗 [1] 4/13\n遵循 [1] 3/23\n副本 [2] 20/4 20/5 到期 [2] 12/7 13/2 以下 [3] 1/18 11/24\n公司 [1] 2/16 E 19/22\n公司 [1] 10/21 较早 [1] 12/2 脚 [1] 6/11\n股份公司 [1] 1/8 东部 [1] 2/17\n正确地 [1] 4/7\n费用 [1] 10/1 EDWARD（爱德华）[2] 2/5 3/10 形成 [1] 5/14\n向前 [2] 4/6 16/22\n能够 [2] 7/16 15/25 高效的 [1] 11/7 发现 [2] 4/7 6/16\n律师 [7] 3/6 3/18 6/15 努力 [1] 6/13 燃料 [1] 9/25\n11/17 14/6 15/23 19/2 努力 [1] 17/11 基金 [1] 1/3\n县 [1] 1/2\n一对 [1] 10/10 任一 [1] 11/12\n他人的 [1] 5/15 资金 [1] 2/20\n进一步 [3] 12/20 19/19 19/20\n过程 [4] 4/19 6/23 8/9 雇员 [1] 5/16\n17/23 雇员 [2] 9/19 10/14 G\n法院 [45] 参与 [1] 19/7 游戏 [1] 17/17\n法院的 [10] 4/9 4/11 7/13 参与 [3] 4/14 17/17 19/6 诉讼策略 [2] 17/15 19/3\n8/25 12/15 12/15 12/25 17/13\n17/16 18/24 英语 [1] 6/10\n禁止 [1] 6/3 给予 [3] 4/15 4/20 9/18\n日内瓦 [1] 6/16\nCRR [1] 20/12 足够 [1] 18/7 GENEVER（吉尼弗）[4] 1/8 1/8 2/16 2/16\n水晶般清楚 [1] 4/11 完全地 [1] 14/23 取得 [1] 10/4\n保管人 [1] 10/13 实体 [10] 13/3 13/11 GIATOMASI（贾托马西）[1] 2/19\nD 13/22 16/16 17/4 17/6 17/22 给予 [3] 10/8 10/11 10/12\n已给予 [3] 9/16 9/17 10/15\n女儿 [3] 5/15 8/17 8/17 17/24 18/12 19/9\n有权 [1] 6/8 去 [2] 4/3 10/4\n日 [7] 12/16 12/16 13/1 17/9 实体 [1] 7/7 进行 [1] 16/2\n17/9 19/20 20/3 录入 [1] 11/15 将要 [5] 10/17 11/4 11/7\n决定 [1] 7/10 ERIA [1] 2/10 13/6 13/24\n已决定 [2] 7/2 11/11 Erica（埃丽卡）[1] 3/15 Golden（戈尔登）[4] 9/23 10/3 10/6\n决定 [1] 19/4\n认为适当 [1] 5/2 尤其 [1] 15/22\nESQ [10] 2/4 2/5 2/5 2/9 2/9 10/8\nGolden 的 [1] 10/5\n挫败 [1] 18/13 2/10 2/13 2/13 2/18 2/22 已离去 [1] 18/1\n被告 [10] 2/7 2/11 2/15 实质上 [1] 13/4 好的 [6] 3/1 3/1 3/3 3/4 3/5\n2/19 3/12 6/3 8/21 13/3 已确立 [1] 16/12 3/11\n14/11 18/7\n被告 [1] 1/10 确立 [1] 18/13\n甚至 [2] 9/17 11/5 曾经 [2] 6/20 8/5 政府 [1] 6/12\n延期 [1] 10/25 每一 [3] 4/23 12/16 17/9 准许 [2] 11/6 11/8\n\nG 在 [59]\n已提交：纽约县书记员 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 让我们 [3] 5/6 16/25 16/25\n索引编号 652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\n文档 440-19\nNYSCEF 文档编号 898\n苦干 [1] 19/14 不准确 [1] 15/14\n提交日期 05/25/22\n录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37\n不适当的 [1] 15/24 征收 [4] 12/2 12/5 13/24\n第 24 页，共 27 页\nNYSCEF 收讫：07/29/2021\n18/16\nGUE [1] 1/7 27\nGUI [2] 1/7 1/7 包括 [3] 4/18 6/4 14/20 许可 [1] 8/4\nGUO [4] 1/7 1/7 1/8 6/10 纳入 [1] 6/16 轻微 [1] 14/15\nGUY [1] 2/13 纳入 [1] 6/7 如同 [4] 3/25 5/7 7/5 15/20\nGWO [1] 1/6 索引 [1] 1/5 有限 [2] 2/20 6/5\nH 信息 [2] 10/4 15/13\n无数 [1] 11/20 进行诉讼 [1] 16/22\n诉讼 [1] 6/19\n黑客攻击 [1] 6/9 指示 [3] 7/19 15/18 LLC [3] 1/9 2/15 2/16\n曾有 [4] 5/6 9/14 12/10 12/18 15/19 LLP [3] 2/2 2/7 2/11\n手 [1] 7/6 工具 [1] 19/3 更久 [1] 18/23\nHAOYUN [2] 1/7 1/8\n发生 [2] 7/21 8/8 不足 [1] 15/24\n利益 [1] 14/25 看 [2] 7/21 16/21\n有 [32] International（国际）[10] 2/20 3/20 M\n尚未 [1] 9/17 5/13 7/7 7/15 9/14 9/19 作出 [13] 7/6 8/24 9/5 13/21\n有 [20] 5/9 6/18 7/21 8/13 14/25 15/1 15/13 14/17 15/15 15/23 16/4 16/6\n9/4 9/7 10/9 10/17 10/18\n11/20 12/3 12/19 13/3 14/5 互联网 [1] 15/11\n口译员 [1] 2/24 17/21 18/18 18/21 18/22\n维护 [1] 4/20\n14/17 17/12 19/15 19/19 20/3 恐吓 [1] 6/13 主要 [1] 14/21\n20/5 进入 [2] 6/17 8/1 作出 [3] 4/1 9/4 14/16\n尚未 [2] 5/6 10/15 Investments（投资）[1] 2/20 使得 [2] 8/21 10/23\n他 [32] 涉及 [1] 6/11 Mallorca（马略卡）[2] 5/5 8/7\n他已经 [7] 3/17 9/11 9/12 9/14\n9/16 11/23 11/24 是 [56]\n争点 [5] 4/7 13/19 15/2 Mandarin（普通话）[1] 2/24\nMANYEE [1] 2/24\n听取 [4] 3/24 11/16 14/5 18/6 17/19 19/15 March（3月）[2] 9/15 9/15\n听证 [7] 7/24 9/4 9/6 9/6 已发布 [2] 17/1 18/9 重要的 [1] 15/12\n10/18 10/20 16/8 争点 [1] 13/5 事项 [1] 16/2\n听证 [1] 17/23\nHeaslop（希斯洛普）[1] 4/22 它 [25] May（5月）[11] 4/10 4/21 4/23 6/12\n举行 [2] 4/17 9/2 它是 [13] 3/10 4/13 4/24 5/5\n5/17 6/21 8/24 9/21 12/23 10/9 12/3 12/5 13/6 14/20\n14/24 17/8\n此处 [13] 3/10 6/16 8/13 8/22 14/24 15/6 18/3 20/4 May 15th [1] 17/8\n10/23 11/2 11/8 11/10 11/12 其 [3] 14/13 16/14 18/19 我 [13] 3/6 3/24 7/4 9/23\n14/17 15/13 16/4 16/21 J 10/8 10/11 10/12 10/12 10/15\n特此 [1] 20/9\n高度 [1] 13/9 JOHN（约翰）[3] 2/9 3/13 14/10 11/22 15/18 15/19 18/22\n意思是 [1] 8/10\n他 [6] 4/16 4/20 6/13 7/1 Josh（乔什）[1] 3/16 与此同时 [2] 18/7 19/15\n10/4 11/6 JOSHUA（约书亚）[1] 2/13 MELISSA（梅丽莎）[2] 2/9 3/14\n他本人 [1] 18/8 法官 [12] 4/7 5/14 6/18 7/12 会见 [3] 13/17 13/17 14/13\n其 [22]\n历史 [1] 8/9 7/21 8/10 9/23 10/12 10/23\n11/2 11/9 11/10 METLITSKY（梅特利茨基）[1] 2/5\n中旬 [3] 4/21 4/23 4/24\nHK [10] 2/20 3/20 5/13 7/7 判决书 [5] 7/23 12/1 12/22 MILES（迈尔斯）[5] 1/8 2/7 2/11 3/12\n7/15 9/14 9/19 14/25 15/1 13/15 14/1 6/10\n15/13 July（7月）[3] 1/12 4/24 12/23 百万 [2] 11/25 12/4\nHK International [2] 14/25\n15/1 管辖权 [3] 4/10 12/15 心思 [2] 7/3 7/11\nHKI [2] 8/16 8/18 12/24\n只是 [12] 3/6 5/6 5/22 8/1 Miss（小姐）[1] 3/21\nMITCHELL（米切尔）[4] 2/15 2/18 6/15\nHO [2] 1/6 1/6 8/3 11/10 11/10 11/12 11/18 6/20\n持有 [3] 4/8 4/16 5/1 14/16 15/3 18/25 货币化 [1] 12/21\nHOLDINGS（控股）[4] 1/8 1/9 2/16\n2/16 司法 [2] 1/15 19/14 月 [2] 10/10 12/24\n住所 [1] 6/5 K 系泊 [1] 10/1\n无实际意义 [1] 11/3\nHON [1] 1/14 KLEIN（克莱因）[4] 2/11 2/13 3/16 3/17 更多 [4] 7/20 8/25 13/21\n阁下 [15] 3/3 3/5 3/9 3/21 知道 [5] 3/6 5/18 8/10 9/23 17/21\n4/4 9/7 11/23 14/7 14/19\n16/22 18/3 18/17 19/5 20/1 10/19\nKWOK（郭）[58] 早晨 [6] 3/1 3/3 3/4 3/5\n20/2 Kwok 的 [8] 3/17 3/22 4/18 3/11 16/1\nMOSS（莫斯）[15] 2/5 3/10 3/24 4/3\nHOSTETLER（霍斯特特勒）[2] 2/7 3/14 6/25 8/6 8/17 11/15 11/17 11/14 12/2 12/4 13/16 13/20\n如何 [1] 9/25 L 13/24 15/5 15/17 17/11 17/21\nI L.P [1] 1/3 18/15\n我会 [1] 5/7 Lady（女士）[7] 4/10 6/12 12/3 12/5 Moss 的 [4] 12/1 12/11 12/19\n18/13\n我将 [5] 10/22 11/21 14/5 13/6 14/20 14/24 动议 [13] 1/10 3/8 3/25\n19/1 19/16 最后 [2] 10/10 10/22 4/25 11/1 11/15 11/17 14/8\n我是 [5] 4/1 9/8 13/6 13/9\n14/10 较后 [1] 19/13\nLAWALL（拉沃尔）[1] 2/15 14/12 14/23 15/7 15/12 16/8\n身份 [1] 10/14 合法的 [1] 13/14 促使 [1] 5/3\n提出动议 [2] 12/7 13/11\n如果 [23] 律师 [1] 10/5 已提出动议 [5] 7/16 7/18 12/9\n忽视 [2] 5/23 6/24 准许 [1] 12/7 12/10 12/11\n重要的 [2] 7/4 20/5 留下 [2] 15/2 15/2 活动 [1] 18/20\n施加 [1] 12/13\n已施加 [1] 12/16 LEE（李）[2] 2/22 3/20\n让 [2] 3/6 3/24 移动 [2] 4/9 19/10\n先生 [57]\n\nM 命令 [33]\n已提交：纽约县书记员 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 3/21\n索引编号 652077/2017\n\n案件 22-50073\n文档 440-19\nNYSCEF 文档编号 898\n先生 [32] 已命令 [5] 10/7 10/9 13/11\n提交日期 05/25/22\n录入日期 05/26/22 15:30:37 目前 [1] 13/17\n第 25 页，共 27 页\nNYSCEF 收讫：07/29/2021\nAlter 先生 [2] 10/5 10/7 16/12 17/8\n\n命令 [6] 12/20 17/16 17/25 推定 [1] 4/17\n胜诉 [1] 18/12\nMr. Kwok（郭先生） [1] 15/20 19/4 19/11 19/12 初步 [3] 13/21 17/21 18/13\nMr. Mitchell（米切尔先生） [2] 6/15 6/20 通常 [3] 4/19 8/3 8/9 表面证据成立 [3] 13/21 17/21\nMr. Moss（莫斯先生） [12] 4/3 11/14 12/2 组织 [2] 10/12 10/12 18/13\n12/4 13/16 13/20 13/24 15/5 OSTRAGER（奥斯特拉格） [1] 1/14 主要 [1] 5/8\n15/17 17/11 17/21 18/15 其他 [5] 5/24 8/11 9/3 10/6 先前 [3] 15/16 17/13 17/24\nMr. Moss'（莫斯先生的） [4] 12/1 12/11 14/3 程序性 [1] 17/11\n12/19 18/13\nMr. Portas（波塔斯先生） [1] 14/10 我们的 [4] 8/24 9/5 9/12 16/4\n外 [3] 4/10 11/1 12/23 进行 [2] 3/7 11/8\n程序 [1] 14/1\nMr. Siegal（西格尔先生） [4] 4/18 7/14 7/20 结果 [2] 13/7 19/16 程序 [7] 3/23 4/2\n7/23 外部 [1] 19/12 11/20 13/7 15/17 20/7 20/10\nMr. Vartan（瓦尔坦先生） [6] 9/14 9/18 9/22 超过 [1] 17/23 提出 [1] 15/22\n9/25 10/3 15/12 总体 [1] 18/25 承诺 [1] 8/6\n多个 [1] 17/23 自己的 [8] 5/10 5/12 6/22 7/2 相称 [1] 12/14\n我的 [5] 3/10 3/14 7/3 10/14 14/1 14/24 16/10 16/13 拟议 [1] 14/19\n15/16\nMYERS（迈尔斯） [1] 2/2 拥有 [5] 6/9 14/21 14/24 接近 [1] 6/4\n16/15 16/15\n所有权 [3] 8/14 13/19 搁置 [1] 11/10\n清除 [1] 18/8\n\nN 17/20 据称 [1] 12/7\nN.Y（纽约州） [5] 2/4 2/8 2/12 2/17 拥有 [1] 5/17 目的 [1] 8/4\n2/21 P 放置 [4] 5/24 8/11 17/11 19/20\n姓名 [2] 5/15 6/10 放置 [1] 5/14\n必要 [1] 9/6 P.C. [1] 2/19 Q\n需要 [4] 7/20 10/13 10/20 PACIFIC（太平洋） [1] 1/3\n10/20\n需要 [2] 7/24 9/4 页 [2] 1/18 19/22\n页数 [1] 9/16 问题 [4] 7/19 7/20 15/18\n15/20\n从未 [1] 4/24 已支付 [1] 7/22 引述 [14] 6/1 6/2 7/24 14/21\n尽管如此 [2] 12/8 13/13 文件 [2] 5/17 8/15 14/22 15/17 15/18 16/9 16/10\nNEW（纽约） [9] 1/1 1/2 1/12 1/12 2/4 部分 [2] 1/2 6/12 16/11 16/15 16/15 16/16\n2/8 2/12 2/17 2/21 部分地 [1] 18/8 16/17\n不错 [3] 4/4 19/19 20/3 当事人 [1] 13/5 R\n无 [28] 合伙人 [1] 3/10\n非当事人 [1] 3/19\n也不 [1] 19/7 当事人 [1] 15/8 R.P.R. [1] 1/24\n费率 [1] 13/1\n不 [31] PAX [1] 5/19\n支付 [1] 9/25 而是 [2] 3/2 18/13\n注意 [3] 14/16 15/3 16/18 支付 [1] 4/2 达成 [1] 13/4\n没有任何内容 [5] 8/19 9/21 10/16 支付 [1] 10/3 真实 [1] 9/21\n17/12 19/19 罚款 [1] 13/15 确实 [4] 6/22 9/9 16/7\nNovember（11月） [1] 7/24 待决 [2] 11/16 13/7 16/23\nNovember 12（11月12日） [1] 7/24 便士 [1] 7/22 确认 [2] 16/1 16/7\n现在 [7] 5/4 5/5 8/7 10/11\n12/23 13/4 18/1 人员 [1] 4/18\n完善 [1] 18/3 记录 [13] 10/19 11/18 13/17\n14/16 14/23 15/3 15/6 15/19\n无处 [1] 6/18 危险 [1] 14/1 16/5 16/9 18/17 19/1 19/21\n期间 [1] 7/25 提及 [2] 6/8 6/17\nO 许可 [1] 7/16 提及 [1] 6/1\nO'MELVERY [1] 2/2 人 [1] 8/16 关于 [1] 15/11\n负有义务 [1] 12/13 个人 [2] 3/18 6/15 关于 [1] 15/16\n义务 [2] 11/19 12/19\n取得 [1] 12/20 PETRILLO（佩特里洛） [3] 2/11 2/13 3/17 涉及 [2] 10/8 13/5\n显然 [2] 4/12 15/21 照片 [1] 6/25\n一件 [1] 6/24 可靠性 [1] 15/14\n提出 [1] 5/20 地点 [1] 6/5 救济 [2] 5/2 6/2\n官员 [1] 8/6 原告 [6] 1/4 3/9 6/4 迁移 [1] 15/16\n官员 [1] 9/20 14/13 14/19 16/6 仍然 [2] 13/16 19/12\nOFFICIAL（官方） [1] 1/11 原告的 [1] 16/5 记得 [1] 10/7\n离岸 [1] 7/25 Plaintiffs（原告） [1] 2/3 移除 [1] 17/4\n好的 [2] 5/17 10/18\n在 [32] 计划 [1] 3/7 已移除 [4] 12/14 13/13 17/2\n17/14\n一旦 [1] 16/10 Plaza（广场） [1] 2/8\n高兴 [1] 4/2 代表 [1] 10/21\n一 [3] 9/7 13/24 17/1 加 [1] 11/25 反复 [1] 6/1\n仅 [4] 7/17 8/13 9/16 15/12 要点 [3] 7/25 9/9 10/22 答复 [1] 5/7\noOo [3] 19/23 20/9 20/13 PORTAS（波塔斯） [3] 1/24 14/10 20/12 法庭记录员 [2] 1/25 20/13\n机会 [3] 1/3 4/1 18/8 积极地 [1] 18/15 代表 [2] 12/6 17/3\n反对 [1] 15/23 占有 [1] 12/21 代理 [2] 7/23 12/3\n反对意见 [4] 5/7 5/8 5/19\n5/22 发布 [1] 6/25 代理 [1] 6/16\n代理 [2] 7/14 7/17\n或 [17] 3/1 5/1 6/5 6/19 6/19 发布 [2] 15/11 15/14\n帖子 [1] 15/9 请求 [5] 12/8 15/16 18/18\n8/3 10/2 13/24 15/19 15/20 权力 [1] 4/8 18/21 18/23\n15/23 15/24 16/18 17/4 17/6 祈求 [1] 6/2 请求的 [1] 12/6\n18/13 19/13 排除 [1] 9/13 请求 [1] 9/12\n策划 [1] 14/2 当前 [4] 2/23 3/7 3/13 解决 [3] 13/5 17/19 19/15\n\nR 因此 [23]\n已提交：纽约县书记员 07/29/2021 03:55 PM 10/22 11/3 11/9 18/15\n索引号 652077/2017\n\nCase 22-50073\nDoc 440-19\nNYSCEF 文件编号 898\n尊重 [2] 6/23 15/15 仅 [1] 13/2\nFiled 05/25/22\nEntered 05/26/22 15:30:37 那里 [14] 4/21 7/19 8/2 8/22\n第 26 页，共\nNYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021\n回应 [1] 9/12 一些 [1] 7/25\n\n某人 [2] 5/15 11/21 10/19 11/20 13/19 15/17\n15/18 16/18 17/8 19/8 19/19\n其余 [1] 19/1 某事 [2] 19/6 19/20 19/20\n被限制 [1] 19/9 儿子 [1] 5/15 有 [8] 5/23 8/16 8/18\n限制 [4] 4/9 7/22 9/1 不久 [1] 18/7 8/19 9/9 11/25 15/20 15/24\n18/19 更早 [1] 19/13 此后 [1] 12/10\n退回 [1] 10/11 抱歉 [1] 14/10 从而 [1] 6/7\n正确 [6] 3/24 4/22 5/18 6/21 种类 [1] 15/9 因此 [1] 9/2\n10/6 18/5 寻求 [2] 12/2 12/5 这些 [6] 4/2 8/5 13/6 13/21\n权利 [1] 5/14 Spain（西班牙） [3] 5/5 8/7 8/10 15/17 17/22\n产生 [1] 13/1 说 [3] 3/7 3/25 11/19 他们 [6] 5/20 6/23 6/24 8/13\nROBERT（罗伯特） [2] 1/24 20/12 发言 [1] 14/9 10/15 10/18\nRockefeller（洛克菲勒） [1] 2/8 特别 [1] 3/19 他们是 [3] 10/11 15/9 15/22\nRPR [1] 20/12 Spring（春季） [4] 9/23 10/3 10/6 事项 [2] 8/3 17/1\n规则 [2] 15/10 15/25\n裁定 [6] 10/25 14/7 14/12 10/8 事项 [1] 15/4\n16/24 18/20 19/17 Square（广场） [2] 2/3 2/21\nSTATE（州） [1] 1/1 认为 [5] 4/6 8/8 9/5 11/6\n16/5\n裁定 [1] 14/15 陈述 [2] 16/9 16/15 第三 [3] 2/12 7/14 15/8\n运行 [1] 13/15 陈述 [5] 4/1 7/6 8/13 第三方 [1] 15/8\n8/15 14/13 十三 [1] 9/15\nS 陈述 [4] 7/5 10/16 本 [33]\nS-I-E-G-A-L [1] 3/13 14/17 15/15 那些 [3] 7/5 14/15 19/11\n说 [8] 4/16 4/22 6/11 7/9 States（州） [15] 8/1 12/6 12/17 尽管 [1] 9/9\n7/17 9/22 9/25 15/17 12/18 13/12 14/4 17/3 17/5 认为 [1] 8/2\n缘故 [2] 15/3 18/18 17/10 17/14 17/19 18/11 威胁 [1] 6/13\n薪金 [1] 10/1 维持 [5] 11/6 11/15 13/6 14/8 直到 [1] 4/20\n相同 [1] 7/9 14/12 时间 [7] 4/13 4/25 8/5 8/9\n制裁 [2] 12/25 17/9 仍然 [2] 7/22 10/15 12/4 18/21 18/22\n制裁 [2] 12/13 13/2 直接 [1] 4/6 Times（时报） [2] 2/3 2/21\nSARNOFF（萨诺夫） [2] 2/4 3/10 陈述 [2] 16/9 16/15 时间表 [1] 18/2\n满足 [2] 12/22 13/25\n说 [7] 5/20 5/22 6/20 6/23 Street（街） [2] 1/11 2/17 今天 [3] 16/14 16/24 17/12\n10/3 14/5 16/22 STUART（斯图尔特） [2] 2/4 3/10\n提交 [1] 7/12 告知 [1] 9/23\n采取 [1] 4/18\n说 [1] 7/2 已提交 [1] 14/19 笔录 [3] 20/4 20/5\n称 [3] 5/19 6/10 10/13 传票 [1] 9/15 20/10\n第二 [1] 6/24 后续 [1] 19/12 转移 [1] 8/3\n其次 [1] 15/8 子集 [1] 9/16 转移 [1] 18/10\n藏匿 [1] 8/3 充分 [3] 8/25 15/21 翻译 [1] 11/21\n见 [2] 4/2 4/4 16/20 翻译 [1] 3/23\n似乎 [1] 13/20 充分地 [1] 5/3 译文 [1] 11/24\n已见 [1] 5/13 据称 [2] 7/7 8/18 译员 [1] 3/22\n出售 [3] 7/2 7/11 7/12 SUPREME（最高） [1] 1/1 透明 [1] 17/17\nSENIOR（高级） [2] 1/25 20/13\nSeptember（9月） [3] 6/1 7/5 18/4 确信 [1] 9/8 旅行 [2] 4/19 7/24\nSeptember 2020（2020年9月） [2] 6/1 7/5 意外 [1] 10/20 真实 [1] 20/10\n顺序 [1] 19/1 怀疑 [1] 6/8\n暂停 [1] 7/1 推文 [1] 6/25\nTwitter [1] 7/1\n数个 [3] 6/11 10/10 15/4 两个 [1] 12/24\nSHAHINIAN（沙希尼安） [1] 2/19 T 类型 [1] 4/14\n摇晃 [1] 11/1 采取 [3] 11/3 11/9 12/21\nshell（空壳） [4] 5/12 5/14 5/17 已采取 [2] 9/11 16/17 U\n17/17 采取 [1] 8/15 UNA [2] 2/24 3/21\n盾牌 [1] 5/16 谈话 [1] 5/6 不知情 [1] 18/22\n船舶 [20] 12/2 12/5 12/5 12/7 税 [1] 10/10 理解 [3] 11/14 11/22\n12/9 12/10 12/17 12/18 12/20 TEAMS [4] 1/10 1/13 2/1 2/23 18/24\n12/21 12/21 12/23 13/4 13/5\n13/12 13/13 13/20 13/22 14/2 技术性 [1] 8/14 明确无误地 [1] 18/14\n18/20 告知 [2] 6/18 9/18\n期限 [1] 18/4 身份不明 [1] 8/16\nUnited（美国） [15] 8/1 12/6 12/17\n应当 [3] 9/2 10/25 19/19 领海 [9] 13/12 14/3 12/18 13/12 14/3 17/3 17/5\n显示 [1] 16/5 17/2 17/5 17/10 17/18 18/10 17/10 17/14 17/18 18/11\n证明 [8] 8/21 8/23 8/24 19/10 19/12 18/23 19/11 19/13\n9/6 13/21 16/18 17/22 18/14 作证 [1] 9/13 不太可能 [1] 15/14\n一方 [4] 5/24 8/11 9/3 10/6 较 [4] 8/25 13/21 14/3 未获满足 [1] 13/16\nSIEGAL（西格尔） [6] 2/9 4/18 7/14 7/20 17/21 直至 [1] 11/1\n7/23 14/10 感谢 [6] 4/4 14/7 14/12 20/1 未经核实 [1] 15/8\nSiegel（西格尔） [1] 3/13 20/2 20/6 根据 [1] 17/3\n同时 [1] 11/23 that（该） [105] 我们 [3] 9/8 9/17 9/19\n同时地 [1] 3/22 那是 [9] 4/23 5/20 8/22 9/7 USA（美国） [1] 2/20\n自从 [4] 6/25 7/21 9/15 9/15 11/1 13/17 14/5 19/4 19/18 使用 [1] 6/10\n单一 [1] 10/8\n情况 [1] 18/25 他们的 [2] 4/18 6/17 V\n缓慢地 [1] 19/14 他们 [2] 9/24 10/9\n然后 [8] 3/7 7/3 7/11 7/25 有效 [1] 12/11\n\nV 已提交：纽约县书记员 07/29/2021 03:55 PM\nY 索引号 652077/2017\n\nCase 22-50073\nDoc 440-19\nNYSCEF 文件编号 898\n价值 [3] 12/3 12/14 13/4 Filed 05/25/22\nEntered 05/26/22 15:30:37\n游艇 [13] 4/10 4/19 4/24 5/3 第 27 页，共\nNYSCEF 收到日期：07/29/2021\nVARTAN（瓦尔坦） [8] 2/22 3/20 9/14 27\n6/2 6/2 6/6 6/9 6/11 7/1 7/6\n9/18 9/22 9/25 10/3 15/12 7/24 8/7\n非常 [2] 4/1 20/4\n船只 [1] 18/23 年 [3] 4/21 4/23 12/2\n然而 [1] 8/5\nVIA [4] 1/10 1/13 2/1 2/23 YORK（约克） [9] 1/1 1/2 1/12 1/12\n违反 [1] 4/9 2/4 2/8 2/12 2/17 2/21\n违反 [3] 12/11 12/15\n17/13 你 [22]\n你已经 [1] 18/1\n航程 [1] 14/2 你的 [20] 3/3 3/5 3/9 3/21\nW 4/4 9/7 11/14 11/23 14/7\n等待 [2] 11/10 11/21 14/7 14/19 16/22 18/2 18/3\n18/17 19/4 19/5 19/15 20/1\nWAN [2] 1/6 1/7 20/2\n想要 [5] 10/7 11/16 14/15\n14/16 15/3\n想要 [2] 8/1 18/25\n想要 [1] 9/7\n是 [23]\n不是 [3] 17/15 17/15 17/16\n水域 [9] 13/12 14/3 17/2\n17/5 17/10 17/18 18/10 19/10\n19/13\n方式 [5] 5/4 7/9 11/7 11/12\n13/24\n我们 [27]\n我们将 [2] 11/11 18/6\n我们是 [3] 3/9 6/20 10/17\n我们已经 [5] 5/13 8/24 9/5 9/15\n16/4\n天气 [1] 12/7\n欢迎 [1] 9/8\n好 [8] 4/24 5/13 5/22 6/20\n9/5 10/14 14/13 18/6\nWEN [2] 1/7 1/7\nWEN-GUI [1] 1/7\nWENGUI [2] 1/7 6/10\n前往 [1] 10/5\n是 [5] 7/6 13/11 15/15 19/9\n20/8\n什么 [10] 5/20 7/21 9/8 9/16\n9/18 9/23 10/3 10/9 10/19\n18/2\n无论什么 [3] 5/1 10/2 17/11\n任何 [2] 11/19 17/12\n轮子 [1] 19/14\n何时 [3] 4/23 15/22 16/21\n何处 [2] 5/4 9/22\n于是 [1] 20/7\n是否 [1] 18/19\n其 [11] 10/13 10/18 12/3\n12/13 12/13 15/10 15/25\n15/25 16/3 19/6 19/14\n当 [1] 11/18\n谁 [14] 3/6 3/12 3/22 3/22\n4/1 6/10 7/14 7/16 7/19 8/17\n14/9 15/18 15/19 16/19\n谁是 [1] 6/15\n为什么 [3] 8/8 15/19 17/8\nWILKINSON（威尔金森） [2] 2/24 3/21\n将 [6] 3/22 5/2 11/2 13/10\n19/14 20/6\n冬季 [1] 4/20\n在……之内 [1] 17/10\n不会 [4] 4/17 10/11 10/12\n18/16\n词 [1] 4/19\n工作 [1] 7/2\n将会 [6] 3/25 12/19 13/20\n17/18 17/19 19/7\n错误 [2] 6/21 6/23","key_entities":["Kwok","Guo","CIPA","Ho Wan Kwok"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":898,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":11804,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-05-25 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-05-25","updated_at":"2026-08-23 21:58:14"}