{"id":"court_ctb_440_25","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":440,"sub_number":25,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2022-05-20","title":"EXHIBIT PAX 27 Rule 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"## **EXHIBIT PAX 27**\n\nRule 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims\n\n| 22-50073 | | | |\n|-----------------------|-----|----------------------------|--|\n| Ho Wan Kwok
IN RE: | | | |\n| | | | |\n| | PAX | 27 | |\n| | | | |\n| | | 5/25/2022 Admitted in Full | |\n| | | P.E. | |\n| | | | |\n| | | | |\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\nIn re:\n\nChapter 11 Case No.\n\nHO WAN KWOK1\n\n22-50073 (JAM)\n\nDebtor.\n\nMay 20, 2022\n\n## **DECLARATION OF MAKENZIE RUSSO IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.'S MOTION TO DISMISS CHAPTER 11 CASE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL JOINDER TO UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE APPOINTMENT OF A CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE**\n\nI, Makenzie Russo, declare:\n\n1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of New York and am an\n\nassociate at the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers, 7 Times Square, New York, NY 10036,\n\ncounsel for Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. (\"PAX\"). I respectfully submit this\n\nDeclaration in support of PAX's Motion to Dismiss Chapter 11 Case, or in the Alternative,\n\nPartial Joinder to United States Trustee (\"Motion to Dismiss\") [ECF 183].\n\n2. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of PAX Exhibit 27, \"Federal Rule of\n\nEvidence 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims.\" In connection with the May 25, 2022 Hearing\n\non PAX's Motion to Dismiss, PAX offers PAX Exhibit 27 as a summary of information relevant\n\nto the litigation claims referenced in Debtor's Schedule F.2\n\n3. To compile PAX Exhibit 27, colleagues of mine at O'Melveny & Myers LLP (\"O'Melveny\") searched the public record to identify litigation matters involving the litigants\n\n1 The last four digits of the Debtor's taxpayer identification number are 9595.\n\n2 *See* Debtor's Schedule F, ECF 78.\n\nlisted on the Debtor's Schedule F that held a claim against the Debtor individually. For each of the relevant litigation matters identified, O'Melveny reviewed the court's public dockets, gathered the information reflected in the chart, and then summarized the current status of the litigation in the chart. For example, the chart indicates, among other things, whether a case had been dismissed and whether a trial date had been set, citing the appropriate docket entry number.\n\nDated: May 20, 2022 New York, New York Respectfully submitted,\n\n*/s/ Makenzie Russo* Makenzie Russo mrusso@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 728-5819\n\n*Attorney for Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.*\n\n| Schedule F: Nonpriority Unsecured Creditors1 | | | | |\n|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|\n| Party | Claim According to | Status | Trial Date | |\n| | Schedule F | | | |\n| | Beijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye Stainless Decoration Center et al. v. Wengui Guo et al., Case No. 653176/2017
(N.Y. Sup. 2017) | | | |\n| Xiong Xian Wei Ye | Unknown | On May 12, 2020, Defendants' motion to dismiss was granted | Case dismissed | |\n| Beijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye | Unknown | \"to the extent that the complaint is dismissed in its entirety | | |\n| Stainless Decoration Center | | pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7).\" Order, Dkt. No. 69 at 5. The | | |\n| (\"Xiong Xian Wei Ye\") | | court ordered the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the | | |\n| | | complaint. Id. | | |\n| Beijing Bi Hai Ge Lin Yuan | Unknown | | | |\n| Lin Lu Hua, Ltd | | | | |\n| (\"Bi Hai Ge Lin\") | | | | |\n| Cheng Jian Qu Jian She | \\$12,000,000 | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| Beijing Cheng Jian Qu Jian | Unknown | | | |\n| She Group, Ltd. | | | | |\n| (\"Cheng Jian Qu Jian She\") | | | | |\n| Shi Jia Zhuang Zhen Yuan | Unknown | | | |\n| Jian Zhu An Shuang Gong | | | | |\n| Cheng Ltd. Beijing First | | | | |\n| Branch | | | | |\n| (\"Zhen Yuan Jian Zhu\") | | | | |\n| Hong Qi Qu | \\$9,809,422.71 | | | |\n| Hong Qi Qu Jian She Group | Unknown | | | |\n| Ltd | | | | |\n| (\"Hong Qi Qu\") | | | | |\n| Nan Tong Si Jian | \\$5,568,522 | | | |\n| Nan Tong Si Jian Group Ltd. | Unknown | | | |\n| (\"Non Tong Si Jian\") | | | | |\n\n## **Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 Summary of Schedule F Litigation Claims**\n\n1 PAX searched the public record for any litigants listed on the Debtor's Schedule F that held a claim against the Debtor individually. *See* Schedule F: Nonpriority Unsecured Creditors, ECF 78 at 19–21. There were a number of purported litigation claims that PAX could not locate in the public record: Clark Hill, Gao Bingchen, Hero Grant Limited, Hong Zeng, Jumbo Century Limited, Kui Cheng, MacDonald, New Dynamic Development Limited, Sail Victory Limited, Strategic Vision, The Sherry-Netherland, Thomas Ragland, UBS AG, UBS AG (London Branch), Well Origin Limited, Yue Hua Zhu Shi.\n\n| Beijing Fu Le Hong Ma Jian | Unknown | | | |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--|\n| Shu Shuang Shi Gong Cheng, | | | | |\n| Ltd. | | | | |\n| (\"Fu Le Hong Ma\") | | | | |\n| Yua Hua Zhuang Shi | \\$1,571,530.36 | | | |\n| He Bei Yue Hua Zhuang Shi | Unknown | | | |\n| Gong Cheng Ltd | | | | |\n| (\"Yue Hua Zhuang Shi\") | | | | |\n| Jian Gong | \\$5,380,262.32 | | | |\n| Jiang Su Province Jian Gong | Unknown | | | |\n| Group Ltd Beijing Branch | | | | |\n| (\"Jian Gong\") | | | | |\n| (S.D.N.Y. 2017)2
Tang et al. v. Guo, Case No. 1:17-cv-09031 | | | | |\n| Baiqiao Tang | Unknown | On February 1, 2022, the Court ordered that \"all claims and | Case dismissed | |\n| Jing Geng | Unknown | causes of action asserted in this action by Plaintiff Tang and | | |\n| | | Plaintiff Geng are dismissed with prejudice\" where Plaintiff | | |\n| | | Tang \"has failed to prosecute his claims\" and \"Plaintiff Geng | | |\n| | | passed away in April 2021, and no motion to substitute a proper | | |\n| | | party, or for an extension of time to do so, has been filed.\" | | |\n| | | Order, Dkt No. 97. | | |\n| Watson Meng and Boxun Inc. v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 159636/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Nov. 7, 2017) | | | | |\n| Boxun Inc.3 | Unknown | On October 7, 2021, the court certified the case as ready for | No trial date set | |\n| Watson Meng4 | Unknown | trial. Note of Issue, Dkt. No. 57. Kwok moved to vacate the | | |\n| Weican Meng/Boxun Inc. | \\$1,000,000 | note of issue and the reply briefing was filed on November 9, | | |\n| | | 2021. Reply Aff. in Supp. of Mot. to Vacate Note of Issue, Dkt | | |\n| | | No. 120. | | |\n| Keyi Zilkie, Huizhen Wang, Chao-Chih Chiu, Yunxia Wu v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo, Index No. 652843/2021 (N.Y. Sup. April 29, 2021) | | | | |\n| Chao-Chih Chiu | Unknown | On November 5, 2021, the court entered a stay pursuant to the | N/A | |\n| Huizhen Wang | Unknown | parties'
stipulation that a stay of the action was appropriate | | |\n| Keyi Ziklie | Unknown | while Plaintiffs seek distributions from the SEC-administered | | |\n\n2 These parties filed claims in New York Supreme Court. Compl., *Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al*., Case No. 153969/2019 (N.Y. Sup. 2019). Those proceedings have been dormant since September 30, 2019, the date the complaint was filed. *See* Docket, *Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al*., Case No. 153969/2019 (N.Y. Sup. 2019).\n\n3 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F. 4 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n| Yunxia Wu | Unknown | Fair Fund in connection with their claims. Order, Dkt. No. 30 at
2. | | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|--|\n| | Zhengjun Dong, Wen Lin, Kaixin Hong, Chenglong Wang v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo, Index No.
652190/2021
(N.Y. Sup. 2021) | | | |\n| Chenglong Wang | Unknown | Plaintiffs
requested severance of claims against Kwok
in light of | N/A | |\n| Kaixin Hong | Unknown | his bankruptcy
in order
to proceed against other defendants. | | |\n| Wen Lin | Unknown | Order
to Show Cause, Dkt. No. 106. | | |\n| Zhengjun Dong | Unknown | | | |\n| Rong Zhang, Xiaodan Wang, Chong Shen Raphanella | | v. Voice of Guo, GTV, Saraca, ROL Miles Guo, Case No. 2:21-cv-01079 | (D. Ariz. 2021) | |\n| Chong Shen Raphanella | Unknown | Partial Motion to Dismiss fully briefed as of February 2, 2022 | N/A | |\n| Rong Zhang | Unknown | and not yet decided. Mot.
to Dismiss Reply, Dkt. No. 43. | | |\n| Xiaodan Wang | Unknown | | | |\n| | | Haihong C. Wang v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 3:21-cv-00359
(D. Conn. 2021) | | |\n| Haihong Wang | Unknown | Kwok filed an answer to the complaint on October 22, 2021. | N/A | |\n| | | Dkt No. 42. There was no other docket activity until the Notice | | |\n| | | of Bankruptcy was filed on February 18, 2022. See Docket. | | |\n| | Weiguo Sun, Linda He Cheing, Jia Li Wang, Jiamei
Lu, Jun Liu, Mao-Fu Weng, Ruqin Wang, Teli Chen, Weixiang Ge, Shuang Wang, Xingyu | | | |\n| | | Yan, Yan Gao, Yi LI and Ying Liu v. GTV, Saraca, Voice of Guo, Wengui Guo,
Case No.
1:21-cv-04529 | (S.D.N.Y. 2021) | |\n| Jia Li Wang | \\$430,000 | As of October 14, 2021, discovery in this action was stayed | N/A | |\n| Jiamei Lu | Unknown | while plaintiffs pursue recovery in connection with the SEC | | |\n| Jun Liu | Unknown | administered Fair Fund. Order, Dkt No. 79. | | |\n| Linda He Cheung | Unknown | | | |\n| Moa-Fu [Weng] | Unknown | | | |\n| Ruquin Wang | Unknown | | | |\n| Shuang Wang | Unknown | | | |\n| Teli Chen | Unknown | | | |\n| Weiguo Sun | Unknown | | | |\n| Weixiang Ge | Unknown | | | |\n| Xingyu Yan | Unknown | | | |\n| Yan Gao | Unknown | | | |\n| Yi Li | Unknown | | | |\n| Ying Liu | Unknown | | | |\n| Jianhu Yi and Quiju Jia v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:21-cv-02669
(S.D.N.Y. 2021) | | | | |\n| Jian Hu Yi | Unknown | As of September 22, 2021, discovery in this action was stayed | N/A | |\n| Quiju Jia | Unknown | while plaintiffs pursue recovery in connection with the SEC | | |\n| | | administered Fair Fund. Order, Dkt.
No.
39. According to a | | |\n\n| | | status update, the parties are in continued settlement discussions | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\n| | | to recover from the SEC fund. Letter, Dkt. No. 47. | |\n| | June Shi v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, | Case No. 1:21-cv-01408
(N.D. Ill. 2021) | |\n| June Shi | Unknown | Kwok filed an Answer of September 22, 2021. Amended | N/A |\n| | | Answer, Dkt No. 33. The parties stipulated to a settlement of | |\n| | | some claims on January 14, 2022. Stipulation of Dismissal of | |\n| | | Count VII With Prejudice, Dkt No. 38. | |\n| | | Fan Bingbing v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 156619/2017
(N.Y. Sup. July 24, 2017) | |\n| Fan Bingbing | Unknown | There is no docket activity in this case after the amended | N/A |\n| | | complaint was filed on November 27, 2021. See Docket. | |\n| | | Wengui Guo v. Guo Baosheng, Yan Zhao and Ning Ye, Index No. 151251/2019
(N.Y. Sup. May 3, 2019) | |\n| Guo Baosheng | \\$12,000,000 | There was a gap in the litigation between June 18, 2020 and | N/A |\n| Baosheng Guo5 | Unknown | March 23, 2022. See generally, Docket. During this time | |\n| Ning Ye | \\$12,000,000 | frame, there is only one docket entry. See Notice of ADR | |\n| Yan Zhao | \\$3,000,000 | Options, Dkt
No. 65. On March 21, 2022, the Defendants filed a | |\n| | | Notice of Motion for Leave of the Court to File Supplemental | |\n| | | Motion to Dismiss. Notice, Dkt. No. 66. A Notice of | |\n| | | Bankruptcy was filed shortly thereafter. Notice of Bankruptcy, | |\n| | | Dkt No. 72. | |\n| Jiansheng Xie and Jiefu Zheng v. Wengui Guo, Case No. 155995/2017
(N.Y. Supp. 2017) | | | |\n| Jianshengxie and Jiefu Zheng | Unknown | There is no docket activity in this case after the amended | N/A |\n| | | complaint was filed on June 30, 2017. See
generally,
Docket. | |\n| Jonathan Young v. Guo Wengui, Saraca, Golden Spring, Rule of Law Foundation, Case No. 154683/2020
(N.Y. Sup. 2020) | | | |\n| Jonathan Young | Unknown | Defendants moved to dismiss the case, and those pleadings were | N/A |\n| | | fully briefed as of May 18, 2021. See Docket. There was no | |\n| | | docket activity in the action between May 18, 2021 and | |\n| | | February 16, 2022, when the notice of bankruptcy was filed. Id. | |\n| Wengui
Guo v. Jun Chen (a/k/a Jonathan Ho), Case No. 18-cv-03800, (D.N.J. 2019) | | | |\n| Jun Chen (aka Jonathan Ho) | \\$1,000,000 | On February 22, 2022, the Court ordered the parties to submit | Case dismissed |\n| | | confidential settlement memos on or before March 3, 2022. | pending court |\n| | | Text Order, Dkt No. 52. A settlement mediation was scheduled | approval |\n| | | for March 10, 2022. Scheduling Order, Dkt No. 50. On March | |\n| | | 18, 2022 the
parties \"agreed to a mutual dismissal of their | |\n| | | claims\" and the
court entered an order \"administratively | |\n\n5 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n| | | terminating the action on his records pending approval of the | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------|\n| | | dismissal by the Bankruptcy Court, at which time it will be | |\n| | | dismissed with prejudice.\" Order, Dkt No. 55. | |\n| Liehong Zhuang and Xiao Yan Zhu v. Wengui Guo and Saraca Media Group, Index No. 654999/2020
(N.Y. Sup Oct. 5, 2020) | | | |\n| Liehong Zhuang | Unknown | On September 23, 2021, the Court granted Kwok's motion to | N/A |\n| Liehong Zhuang/Xiao Yan | \\$1,005,000 | dismiss in part. Order, Dkt
No. 77. On February 9, 2022, | |\n| Zhu6 | | Kwok requested that a discovery conference be adjourned in | |\n| Xiao Yan Zhu | Unknown | light of his not having yet filed an Answer. Letter, Dkt No. 82. | |\n| | | A notice of bankruptcy was filed shortly thereafter. Notice of | |\n| | | Bankruptcy, Dkt
No.
85. | |\n| | | Logan Cheng aka Shuiyan Cheng v. Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:20-cv-05678
(S.D.N.Y. 2020) | |\n| Logan Cheng (aka Shiuyan | Unknown | Logan Cheng obtained a judgment for \\$196,940.39 on account | N/A |\n| Cheng) | | of a counterclaim filed in the District of Nevada. Compl., Ex. 5, | |\n| | | Dkt No. 1-5.
Cheng brought an enforcement proceeding in the | |\n| | | Southern District of New York. Compl., Dkt No. 1. Both | |\n| | | parties moved for partial summary judgment, which was fully | |\n| | | briefed as of February 15, 2022. See generally, Docket. | |\n| | | Rui Ma v. Guo Wengui and Golden Spring NY, Index No. 158140/2017
(N.Y. Sup. Sept. 11, 2017 | |\n| Rui Ma | \\$20,000,000 | The case was certified as ready for trial on January 29, 2022. | No trial date set. |\n| | | Note of Issue, Dkt No. 27. Kwok requested oral argument to | |\n| | | vacate the Note of Issue on February 15, 2022. Letter, Dkt No. | |\n| | | 97. | |\n| | | Ruizheng An v. GTV, Saraca, Guo Wengui, Case No. 1:20-cv-06555 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) | |\n| Ruizheng An | Unknown | On February 1, 2021, the court ordered an extension of time to | N/A |\n| | | finalize a settlement. Order, Dkt No. 41. There has been no | |\n| | | docket activity since. See generally, Docket. | |\n| Samuel Dan Nunberg v. Guo Wengui, Index No. 150141/2020
(N.Y. Sup. Feb. 19, 2020) | | | |\n| Samuel Dan Nunberg | Unknown | Nunberg filed an amended complaint on January 21, 2022. | N/A |\n| Samuel Nunberg7 | \\$1,000,000 | Amended Compl., Dkt No. 96. Kwok moved to strike the | |\n| | | complaint on February 10, 2022. Mem. of Law in Supp.
of Mot. | |\n| | | to Strike, Dkt No. 101. | |\n| Wengui Guo v. Yeliang Xia, No. 18-cv-174
(E.D.Va. 2018) | | | |\n\n6 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, these names appear as litigation claim holders twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n7 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder more than once on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n| Yang Yeliang Xia Lan | Unknown | A jury awarded Kwok \\$100,000 judgment plus interest for | N/A |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\n| | | defamation. Order, Dkt No. 140. The jury awarded the Xia | |\n| | | \\$10,000 for defamation. Id. | |\n| | | | |\n| | | Xia filed a notice of appeal on September 27, 2017. Notice of | |\n| | | Appeal, Dkt
No. 141. Xia requested oral argument on the | |\n| | | appeal in December 2021. Wengui Guo v. Yeliang Xia, Case | |\n| | | No. 19-2062 (4th Cir. 2021), Dkt No. 62. The Court of Appeals | |\n| | | subsequently entered an order deferring consideration of the | |\n| | | motion for oral argument pending assignment of the case to a | |\n| | | panel. Order, Dkt No. 63. | |\n| WA&HF LLC and Ruizheng An v. Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 2:21-cv-00490
(W.D. Wa. 2020) | | | |\n| WA&HF LLC | \\$319,130 | The parties entered into a stipulation of dismissal on April 1, | Case dismissed |\n| | | 2022, upon being able to \"fully compromise[] and settle[] the | |\n| | | claims.\" Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, Dkt No. 21. | |\n| Xiqui (\"Bob\") Fu v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 20-cv-00257
(W.D.Tx. 2020) | | | |\n| Xiqui (\"Bob\") Fu | Unknown | Kwok's Motion to Dismiss was denied on January 15, 2022. | N/A |\n| | | Order, Dkt No. 97. The case is administratively closed pending | |\n| | | the outcome of Kwok's bankruptcy. | |\n| Yan Huang v. Wengui Guo, Index No. 156552/2017
(N.Y. Sup. 2017) | | | |\n| Yan Huang | Unknown | A stipulation of settlement was entered on April 6, 2021. | Case settled |\n| | | Stipulation of Settlement, Dkt No. 68. | |\n| Zheng Wu and Yang Lan v. Guo Wengui, Index No. 152123/2018
(N.Y. Sup 2018) | | | |\n| Yang Lan | Unknown | Kwok filed an Answer on April 25, 2019. Answer, Dkt No. 36. | N/A |\n| Yang Lan and Qu Zheng8 | \\$10,000,000 | On March 2, 2020, the Court ordered the parties to participate in | |\n| Zhang Qu (aka Bruno Wu) | Unknown | a settlement mediation conference. Order, Dkt No. 46. Notices | |\n| | | of appearance and the notice of bankruptcy
are the only
docket | |\n| | | activity since that date. See generally, Docket. | |\n| Wengui Guo v. Danyu Lin, Case No. 2018CP3203623
(S.C., Lexington Cty. 2018) | | | |\n| Danyu Lin | Unknown | The South Carolina court system lists the status as \"dismissed.\" | Case dismissed |\n| | | See generally, Docket. | |\n\n8 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, these names appear as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.","body_zh":"PAX 证据附件 27\n\n关于诉讼请求的《证据规则》第 1006 条摘要\n\n22-50073\n\nHo Wan Kwok（郭文贵）\n关于：\n\nPAX 27\n\n5/25/2022 全部接纳\nP.E.\n\n美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院\n\n关于：\n\n第 11 章案件编号\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）1\n\n22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。\n\n2022年5月20日\nMAKENZIE RUSSO（马肯齐·鲁索）为进一步支持 PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）关于驳回第 11 章案件的动议，或作为替代方案部分加入美国受托人关于作出命令指示指定第 11 章受托人的动议而提交的声明\n\n本人，Makenzie Russo（马肯齐·鲁索），声明如下：\n\n1. 本人是一名获准在纽约州执业的律师，并且是律师事务所 O'Melveny & Myers（欧麦伦律师事务所）（地址：7 Times Square, New York, NY 10036）的律师，该所担任 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业，下称“PAX”）的代理律师。本人谨提交本声明，以支持 PAX 关于驳回第 11 章案件的动议，或作为替代方案部分加入美国受托人（United States Trustee）动议（下称“驳回动议”）[ECF 183]。\n\n2. 随附于此的是 PAX 证据附件 27《关于诉讼请求的《联邦证据规则》第1006条摘要》的真实、正确副本。就 2022年5月25日就 PAX 驳回动议举行的听证而言，PAX 提交 PAX 证据附件 27，作为对债务人附表 F 所列诉讼请求相关信息的摘要。2\n\n3. 为编制 PAX 证据附件 27，本人在 O'Melveny & Myers LLP（欧麦伦律师事务所，下称“O'Melveny”）的同事检索了公开记录，以识别涉及债务人附表 F 所列、对债务人个人持有请求权的诉讼当事人的诉讼事项。\n\n1 债务人纳税人识别号的后四位数字为 9595。\n\n2 参见债务人附表 F，ECF 78。\n\n对于所识别的每一相关诉讼事项，O'Melveny 审阅了法院的公开案卷，收集了图表中反映的信息，随后在图表中概述了诉讼的当前状态。例如，该图表通过引用相应的案卷登记号，表明了一宗案件是否已被驳回以及是否已确定审判日期等事项。\n\n日期：2022年5月20日 纽约州纽约市 谨此提交，\n\n/s/ Makenzie Russo Makenzie Russo（马肯齐·鲁索） mrusso@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP（欧麦伦律师事务所） 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 电话：(212) 728-5819\n\nPacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）的代理律师\n\n附表 F：非优先无担保债权人1\n\n当事人 根据附表 F 的请求权 状态 审判日期\n\nBeijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye Stainless Decoration Center et al.（北京中显伟业不锈钢装饰中心等） v. Wengui Guo（郭文贵） et al.，案件编号 653176/2017\n(N.Y. Sup. 2017)\nXiong Xian Wei Ye（雄显伟业） 未知 2020年5月12日，被告的驳回动议获准 案件已驳回\nBeijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye（北京中显伟业） 未知 “在根据 CPLR 3211(a)(7) 全部驳回起诉状的范围内。”命令，案卷编号 69，第 5 页。法院命令书记官登记驳回起诉状的判决书。同上。\nStainless Decoration Center（不锈钢装饰中心）\n(\"Xiong Xian Wei Ye\")\n\nBeijing Bi Hai Ge Lin Yuan（北京碧海格林园） 未知\nLin Lu Hua, Ltd\n(\"Bi Hai Ge Lin\")\n\nCheng Jian Qu Jian She（城建区建设） \\$12,000,000\n\nBeijing Cheng Jian Qu Jian（北京城建区建设） 未知\nShe Group, Ltd.\n(\"Cheng Jian Qu Jian She\")\n\nShi Jia Zhuang Zhen Yuan（石家庄振源） 未知\nJian Zhu An Shuang Gong\nCheng Ltd. Beijing First\nBranch\n(\"Zhen Yuan Jian Zhu\")\n\nHong Qi Qu（红旗渠） \\$9,809,422.71\nHong Qi Qu Jian She Group（红旗渠建设集团） 未知\nLtd\n(\"Hong Qi Qu\")\n\nNan Tong Si Jian（南通四建） \\$5,568,522\nNan Tong Si Jian Group Ltd.（南通四建集团有限公司） 未知\n(\"Non Tong Si Jian\")\n\n《联邦证据规则》第1006条附表 F 诉讼请求摘要\n\n1 PAX 检索了公开记录，以查找债务人附表 F 所列、对债务人个人持有请求权的任何诉讼当事人。参见附表 F：非优先无担保债权人，ECF 78，第 19–21 页。PAX 无法在公开记录中找到若干声称的诉讼请求：Clark Hill（克拉克·希尔）、Gao Bingchen（高秉臣）、Hero Grant Limited、Hong Zeng（洪增）、Jumbo Century Limited、Kui Cheng（崔成）、MacDonald（麦克唐纳）、New Dynamic Development Limited、Sail Victory Limited、Strategic Vision、The Sherry-Netherland、Thomas Ragland（托马斯·拉格兰德）、UBS AG、UBS AG (London Branch)、Well Origin Limited、Yue Hua Zhu Shi（裕华装饰）。\n\nBeijing Fu Le Hong Ma Jian（北京富乐宏马建） 未知\n\nShu Shuang Shi Gong Cheng,\nLtd.\n(\"Fu Le Hong Ma\")\n\nYua Hua Zhuang Shi（裕华装饰） \\$1,571,530.36\nHe Bei Yue Hua Zhuang Shi（河北裕华装饰） 未知\nGong Cheng Ltd\n(\"Yue Hua Zhuang Shi\")\n\nJian Gong（建工） \\$5,380,262.32\nJiang Su Province Jian Gong（江苏省建工） 未知\nGroup Ltd Beijing Branch\n(\"Jian Gong\")\n\n(S.D.N.Y. 2017)2\nTang et al.（唐等） v. Guo（郭文贵），案件编号 1:17-cv-09031\nBaiqiao Tang（唐百桥） 未知 2022年2月1日，法院命令，“原告唐及原告耿在本案中主张的所有请求和诉因均有偏见地驳回”，其中原告唐“未能推进其请求”，且“原告耿于 2021年4月去世，尚未提交替换适格当事人的动议，或提交申请延长提交该动议期限的动议。”命令，案卷编号 97。 案件已驳回\nJing Geng（耿静） 未知\n\nWatson Meng（孟维灿） and Boxun Inc.（博讯公司） v. Guo Wengui（郭文贵），案件编号 159636/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Nov. 7, 2017)\nBoxun Inc.（博讯公司）3 未知 2021年10月7日，法院证明该案已具备审判条件。审理准备声明，案卷编号 57。郭文贵申请撤销审理准备声明，答复书状于 2021年11月9日提交。支持撤销审理准备声明动议的答复宣誓书，案卷编号 120。 未确定审判日期\nWatson Meng（孟维灿）4 未知\nWeican Meng/Boxun Inc.（孟维灿/博讯公司） \\$1,000,000\n\nKeyi Zilkie（姬绮） , Huizhen Wang（王慧珍）, Chao-Chih Chiu（邱朝吉）, Yunxia Wu（吴云霞） v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo（郭文贵），索引编号 652843/2021 (N.Y. Sup. April 29, 2021)\nChao-Chih Chiu（邱朝吉） 未知 2021年11月5日，法院依据当事人以下约定作出中止：在原告就其请求向美国证券交易委员会管理的公平基金寻求分配期间，中止本诉讼是适当的。命令，案卷编号 30，第 2 页。 不适用\nHuizhen Wang（王慧珍） 未知\nKeyi Ziklie（姬绮） 未知\n\n2 这些当事人在纽约州最高法院提交了请求。起诉状，Baiqiao Tang（唐百桥） and Jing Geng（耿静） v. Wengui Guo（郭文贵） et al.，案件编号 153969/2019 (N.Y. Sup. 2019)。自 2019年9月30日，即提交起诉状之日以来，该等程序一直处于停滞状态。参见案卷，Baiqiao Tang（唐百桥） and Jing Geng（耿静） v. Wengui Guo（郭文贵） et al.，案件编号 153969/2019 (N.Y. Sup. 2019)。\n\n3 出于 PAX 不知的原因，该名称在债务人附表 F 中两次列为诉讼请求权人。4 出于 PAX 不知的原因，该名称在债务人附表 F 中两次列为诉讼请求权人。\n\nYunxia Wu（吴云霞） 未知\n\nZhengjun Dong（董征军）, Wen Lin（林文）, Kaixin Hong（洪凯欣）, Chenglong Wang（王成龙） v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo（郭文贵），索引编号 652190/2021\n(N.Y. Sup. 2021)\nChenglong Wang（王成龙） 未知 鉴于郭文贵破产，原告请求将针对郭文贵的请求分案，以便继续针对其他被告进行诉讼。要求说明理由令，案卷编号 106。 不适用\nKaixin Hong（洪凯欣） 未知\nWen Lin（林文） 未知\nZhengjun Dong（董征军） 未知\n\nRong Zhang（张蓉）, Xiaodan Wang（王晓丹）, Chong Shen Raphanella（沈冲·拉法内拉） v. Voice of Guo, GTV, Saraca, ROL Miles Guo，案件编号 2:21-cv-01079 (D. Ariz. 2021)\nChong Shen Raphanella（沈冲·拉法内拉） 未知 截至 2022年2月2日，部分驳回动议的书面辩论已全部完成，尚未作出裁决。驳回动议答复，案卷编号 43。 不适用\nRong Zhang（张蓉） 未知\nXiaodan Wang（王晓丹） 未知\n\nHaihong C. Wang（王海红） v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo（郭文贵），案件编号 3:21-cv-00359\n(D. Conn. 2021)\nHaihong Wang（王海红） 未知 郭文贵于 2021年10月22日对起诉状提交答辩。案卷编号 42。在 2022年2月18日提交破产通知之前，没有其他案卷活动。参见案卷。 不适用\n\nWeiguo Sun（孙卫国）, Linda He Cheing（何琳达）, Jia Li Wang（王佳丽）, Jiamei Lu（卢佳美）, Jun Liu（刘军）, Mao-Fu Weng（翁茂福）, Ruqin Wang（王茹琴）, Teli Chen（陈特丽）, Weixiang Ge（葛伟翔）, Shuang Wang（王爽）, Xingyu Yan（闫星宇）, Yan Gao（高艳）, Yi LI（李毅） and Ying Liu（刘莹） v. GTV, Saraca, Voice of Guo, Wengui Guo（郭文贵），案件编号\n1:21-cv-04529 (S.D.N.Y. 2021)\nJia Li Wang（王佳丽） \\$430,000 截至 2021年10月14日，在原告就美国证券交易委员会管理的公平基金寻求追偿期间，本案的证据开示程序已中止。命令，案卷编号 79。 不适用\nJiamei Lu（卢佳美） 未知\nJun Liu（刘军） 未知\nLinda He Cheung（何琳达） 未知\nMoa-Fu [Weng]（翁茂福） 未知\nRuquin Wang（王茹琴） 未知\nShuang Wang（王爽） 未知\nTeli Chen（陈特丽） 未知\nWeiguo Sun（孙卫国） 未知\nWeixiang Ge（葛伟翔） 未知\nXingyu Yan（闫星宇） 未知\nYan Gao（高艳） 未知\nYi Li（李毅） 未知\nYing Liu（刘莹） 未知\n\nJianhu Yi（易建湖） and Quiju Jia（贾屈菊） v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo（郭文贵），案件编号 1:21-cv-02669\n(S.D.N.Y. 2021)\nJian Hu Yi（易建湖） 未知 截至 2021年9月22日，在原告就美国证券交易委员会管理的公平基金寻求追偿期间，本案的证据开示程序已中止。命令，案卷编号 39。根据一份状态更新，当事人正在继续进行和解讨论，以从美国证券交易委员会基金中获得追偿。函件，案卷编号 47。 不适用\nQuiju Jia（贾屈菊） 未知\n\nJune Shi（石军） v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo（郭文贵），案件编号 1:21-cv-01408\n(N.D. Ill. 2021)\nJune Shi（石军） 未知 郭文贵于 2021年9月22日提交答辩。修正答辩，案卷编号 33。当事人于 2022年1月14日约定就部分请求达成和解。有偏见地驳回第 VII 罪名项的约定，案卷编号 38。 不适用\n\nFan Bingbing（范冰冰） v. Guo Wengui（郭文贵），案件编号 156619/2017\n(N.Y. Sup. July 24, 2017)\nFan Bingbing（范冰冰） 未知 2021年11月27日提交修正起诉状后，本案没有任何案卷活动。参见案卷。 不适用\n\nWengui Guo（郭文贵） v. Guo Baosheng（郭宝胜）, Yan Zhao（赵岩） and Ning Ye（叶宁），索引编号 151251/2019\n(N.Y. Sup. May 3, 2019)\nGuo Baosheng（郭宝胜） \\$12,000,000 2020年6月18日至 2022年3月23日期间，诉讼活动存在空档。总体参见案卷。在此期间，仅有一项案卷登记。参见替代性争议解决方案通知，案卷编号 65。2022年3月21日，被告提交了申请法院许可提交补充驳回动议的动议通知。通知，案卷编号 66。不久后提交了破产通知。破产通知，案卷编号 72。 不适用\nBaosheng Guo（郭宝胜）5 未知\nNing Ye（叶宁） \\$12,000,000\nYan Zhao（赵岩） \\$3,000,000\n\nJiansheng Xie（谢建生） and Jiefu Zheng（郑杰夫） v. Wengui Guo（郭文贵），案件编号 155995/2017\n(N.Y. Supp. 2017)\nJianshengxie and Jiefu Zheng（谢建生和郑杰夫） 未知 2017年6月30日提交修正起诉状后，本案没有任何案卷活动。总体参见案卷。 不适用\n\nJonathan Young（乔纳森·杨） v. Guo Wengui（郭文贵）, Saraca, Golden Spring, Rule of Law Foundation，案件编号 154683/2020\n(N.Y. Sup. 2020)\nJonathan Young（乔纳森·杨） 未知 被告申请驳回本案，截至 2021年5月18日，相关书面材料已全部提交。参见案卷。本案在 2021年5月18日至 2022年2月16日提交破产通知期间没有任何案卷活动。同上。 不适用\n\nWengui Guo（郭文贵） v. Jun Chen（陈军） (a/k/a Jonathan Ho)，案件编号 18-cv-03800, (D.N.J. 2019)\nJun Chen（陈军） (aka Jonathan Ho) \\$1,000,000 2022年2月22日，法院命令当事人不迟于 2022年3月3日提交保密和解备忘录。文本命令，案卷编号 52。和解调解安排于 2022年3月10日进行。排期命令，案卷编号 50。2022年3月18日，当事人“同意相互撤回其请求”，法院作出命令，“在等待批准的期间，在其记录中行政性终止本案”。 案件已驳回，等待法院批准\n\n5 出于 PAX 不知的原因，该名称在债务人附表 F 中两次列为诉讼请求权人。\n\n终止本案，等待对该事项的批准\n\n“由破产法院驳回，届时该案将被有偏见地驳回。”裁定，Dkt No. 55。\n\nLiehong Zhuang（庄烈宏）和 Xiao Yan Zhu（朱晓燕）诉 Wengui Guo（郭文贵）和 Saraca Media Group（Saraca媒体集团），Index No. 654999/2020\n（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）Oct. 5, 2020）\n\nLiehong Zhuang（庄烈宏） 未知 2021年9月23日，法院部分准许了 Kwok（郭文贵）的驳回动议。裁定，Dkt No. 77。 不适用\nLiehong Zhuang（庄烈宏）/Xiao Yan Zhu（朱晓燕）6 $1,005,000 2022年2月9日，Kwok 请求延期举行证据开示会议，理由是其尚未提交答辩状。\nXiao Yan Zhu（朱晓燕） 未知 信函，Dkt No. 82。此后不久提交了破产通知。破产通知，Dkt No. 85。\n\nLogan Cheng（程水燕，亦称 Shuiyan Cheng）诉 Wengui Guo（郭文贵），Case No. 1:20-cv-05678\n（Southern District of New York（纽约南区）2020）\n\nLogan Cheng（程水燕，亦称 Shiuyan Cheng） 未知 Logan Cheng 就其在 District of Nevada（内华达地区）提出的反诉获得了 $196,940.39 的判决。起诉状，Ex. 5，Dkt No. 1-5。 不适用\n\nCheng 在 Southern District of New York（纽约南区）提起了执行程序。起诉状，Dkt No. 1。双方均提出了部分简易判决动议，截至2022年2月15日已完成书面陈述。总体参见案卷。\n\nRui Ma（马睿）诉 Guo Wengui（郭文贵）和 Golden Spring NY（纽约金泉），Index No. 158140/2017\n（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）Sept. 11, 2017）\n\nRui Ma（马睿） $20,000,000 该案于2022年1月29日被认证为已具备审判条件。争点通知书，Dkt No. 27。Kwok 于2022年2月15日请求就撤销争点通知书进行口头辩论。信函，Dkt No. 97。 尚未确定审判日期。\n\nRuizheng An（安汝正）诉 GTV、Saraca（萨拉卡）、Guo Wengui（郭文贵），Case No. 1:20-cv-06555 （Southern District of New York（纽约南区）2020）\n\nRuizheng An（安汝正） 未知 2021年2月1日，法院命令延长完成和解的期限。裁定，Dkt No. 41。自此以后没有案卷活动。总体参见案卷。 不适用\n\nSamuel Dan Nunberg（萨缪尔·丹·纽伯格）诉 Guo Wengui（郭文贵），Index No. 150141/2020\n（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）Feb. 19, 2020）\n\nSamuel Dan Nunberg（萨缪尔·丹·纽伯格） 未知 Nunberg 于2022年1月21日提交了修正起诉状。修正起诉状，Dkt No. 96。 不适用\nSamuel Nunberg（萨缪尔·纽伯格）7 $1,000,000 Kwok 于2022年2月10日提出删除起诉状的动议。支持删除动议的法律备忘录，Dkt No. 101。\n\nWengui Guo（郭文贵）诉 Yeliang Xia（夏业良），No. 18-cv-174\n（Eastern District of Virginia（弗吉尼亚东区）2018）\n\n6 出于 PAX 不知晓的原因，这些姓名在债务人的附表F中两次被列为诉讼请求持有人。\n\n7 出于 PAX 不知晓的原因，该姓名在债务人的附表F中不止一次被列为诉讼请求持有人。\n\nYang Yeliang Xia Lan（杨·夏业良·兰） 未知 陪审团就诽谤判给 Kwok $100,000 的判决及利息。裁定，Dkt No. 140。陪审团就诽谤判给 Xia $10,000。 同上。 不适用\n\nXia 于2017年9月27日提交上诉通知。上诉通知，Dkt No. 141。Xia 于2021年12月请求就该上诉进行口头辩论。Wengui Guo（郭文贵）诉 Yeliang Xia（夏业良），Case No. 19-2062 （Fourth Circuit（第四巡回上诉法院）2021），Dkt No. 62。上诉法院随后作出裁定，将对口头辩论动议的审议延后，等待将该案分配给合议庭。裁定，Dkt No. 63。\n\nWA&HF LLC（WA&HF有限责任公司）和 Ruizheng An（安汝正）诉 Saraca（萨拉卡）、Wengui Guo（郭文贵），Case No. 2:21-cv-00490\n（Western District of Washington（华盛顿西区）2020）\n\nWA&HF LLC（WA&HF有限责任公司） $319,130 双方于2022年4月1日达成撤诉约定，因其能够“完全妥协[]并和解[]有关请求”。撤诉约定及命令，Dkt No. 21。 案件已驳回\n\nXiqui (“Bob”) Fu（傅希秋，“鲍勃”）诉 Guo Wengui（郭文贵），Case No. 20-cv-00257\n（Western District of Texas（得克萨斯西区）2020）\n\nXiqui (“Bob”) Fu（傅希秋，“鲍勃”） 未知 Kwok 的驳回动议于2022年1月15日被驳回。裁定，Dkt No. 97。该案因等待 Kwok 破产程序的结果而被行政关闭。 不适用\n\nYan Huang（黄燕）诉 Wengui Guo（郭文贵），Index No. 156552/2017\n（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）2017）\n\nYan Huang（黄燕） 未知 2021年4月6日录入了和解约定。和解约定，Dkt No. 68。 案件已和解\n\nZheng Wu（吴征）和 Yang Lan（杨兰）诉 Guo Wengui（郭文贵），Index No. 152123/2018\n（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院）2018）\n\nYang Lan（杨兰） 未知 Kwok 于2019年4月25日提交了答辩状。答辩状，Dkt No. 36。 不适用\nYang Lan（杨兰）和 Qu Zheng（郑渠）8 $10,000,000 2020年3月2日，法院命令双方参加和解调解会议。裁定，Dkt No. 46。自该日起，出庭通知和破产通知是唯一的案卷活动。总体参见案卷。\nZhang Qu（张渠，亦称 Bruno Wu） 未知\n\nWengui Guo（郭文贵）诉 Danyu Lin（林丹宇），Case No. 2018CP3203623\n（South Carolina（南卡罗来纳州），Lexington Cty. 2018）\n\nDanyu Lin（林丹宇） 未知 南卡罗来纳州法院系统将该案状态列为“已驳回”。总体参见案卷。 案件已驳回\n\n8 出于 PAX 不知晓的原因，这些姓名在债务人的附表F中两次被列为诉讼请求持有人。","key_entities":["Guo","Kwok","Saraca","GTV","Ho Wan Kwok","Miles Guo","CIPA"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":1,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":21,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":27,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":30,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":33,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":36,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":38,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":41,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":42,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":43,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":46,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":47,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":50,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":52,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":55,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":57,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":62,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":63,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":66,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":68,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":69,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":72,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":78,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":79,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":82,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":96,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":97,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":101,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":106,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":140,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":183,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":3646,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-05-20 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-05-20","updated_at":"2026-08-23 20:44:19"}