{"id":"court_ctb_4434_1","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":4434,"sub_number":1,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":null,"title":"Exhibit 1 Further Revised Proposed Order (clean)","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"## **Exhibit 1**\n\n**Further Revised Proposed Order (clean)**\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ------------------------------------------------------  | x |                         |\n|---------------------------------------------------------|---|-------------------------|\n|                                                         | : |                         |\n| In re:                                                  | : | Chapter 11              |\n|                                                         | : |                         |\n| et al.,1<br>HO WAN KWOK,                                | : | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |\n|                                                         | : |                         |\n| Debtors.                                                | : | (Jointly Administered)  |\n|                                                         | : |                         |\n| ------------------------------------------------------x |   |                         |\n\n## **SECOND AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE TO (I) FURTHER MODIFY OCTOBER 6, 2022 PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 105 AND 107 OF BANKRUPTCY CODE AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(C) AND THE STIPULATED ADDENDUM TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND (II) WAIVE CERTAIN OF THE DEBTOR'S PRIVILEGES CONTROLLED BY THE TRUSTEE, PURSUANT TO THE CONSENT ORDER REGARDING CONTROL OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION RELATED TO RULE 2004 SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION [ECF NO. 856]**\n\nUPON CONSIDERATION OF the *Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee to (I) Further Modify October 6, 2022 Protective Order Entered Pursuant to Sections 105 and 107 of Title 11 of the United States Code and Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Stipulated Addendum to the Protective Order and (II) Waive Certain of the Debtor's Privileges Controlled By the Trustee, Pursuant to the Consent Order Regarding Control of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection Related to Rule 2004 Subpoenaed Documents and Information [ECF No. 856]* (the \"Motion\"),[2](#page-1-1) and good cause having been shown, and the Court having considered\n\n<span id=\"page-1-0\"></span><sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<span id=\"page-1-1\"></span><sup>2</sup> Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Motion.\n\nany and all objections and other responses to the Motion, and the Court finding that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interests of the Debtor's estate and its creditors, and the relief provided herein being narrowly tailored to serve the foregoing purposes, it is by the Court, hereby\n\nORDERED, that the Motion is granted as set forth herein; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Protective Order previously entered by this Court on October 6, 2022\n\n[ECF No. 923] is modified as follows:\n\n- The following language is added[3](#page-2-0) to the first Recital of the Protective Order: \"WHEREAS, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code, U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 (the \"Bankruptcy Code\"), in this Court (the case commenced by such petition, the \"Chapter 11 Case\"); and there are, or may be, judicial or other proceedings before this Court **and other courts, tribunals, or judicial bodies, including in foreign jurisdictions**, including but not limited to investigations, contested matters, adversary proceedings, and other disputes **and litigation** (each a \"Dispute\" and, collectively, the \"Disputes\") arising under the Bankruptcy Code or arising in or relating to the Chapter 11 Case;\"\n- Paragraph 1 of the Protective Order is revised to provide the following: \"This Order governs the disclosure or exchange of all information and documents in connection with this Chapter 11 Case and related Disputes **before this Court**, by a Party . . .[.]\"\n- Paragraph 8 of the Protective Order is revised to provide the following: \"General Limitations On Use And Disclosure Of All Discovery Material: All Discovery Material shall be used by the Trustee in carrying out his duties and responsibilities under the Bankruptcy Code and the appointment order in this case and/or by other Receiving Parties **solely in this Court** for the purposes of a Dispute or the Chapter 11 Case, **including a Dispute in a foreign jurisdiction**, **and but** not for any other purpose **or in any other forum**, including any other litigation or judicial proceedings that are not a Dispute and are not related to this Chapter 11 Case, or any business, competitive, governmental, commercial, or administrative purpose or function.\"\n- The following language is added to paragraph 9 of the Protective Order: \"Confidential Material: Confidential Material, and any and all information contained therein, may be given, shown, made available to, or communicated only to the following: . . . **(c) any Party to a Dispute in a foreign jurisdiction whom the Trustee has requested sign Exhibit A, subject to the Trustee seeking entry of a protective order in such foreign jurisdiction that is consistent with this**\n\n<span id=\"page-2-0\"></span><sup>3</sup> Revisions to the Protective Order are identified in **bold and underline**.\n\n## **Order and substantially similar hereto, to the extent allowable under foreign law; and** . . .\"\n\n- The following language is added to paragraph 10(a) of the Protective Order: \"counsel, and staff working under the express direction of such counsel, for: . . . **iv. any Party to a Dispute in a foreign jurisdiction whom the Trustee has requested sign Exhibit A, subject to the Trustee seeking entry of a protective order in such foreign jurisdiction that is consistent with this Order and substantially similar hereto, to the extent allowable under foreign law; and** . . .\"\n- The following language is added to paragraph 10(g) of the Protective Order \"the Court, **a foreign court, tribunal, and/or judicial body**, its officers, and clerical staff in any judicial proceeding that may result from a Dispute or this Chapter 11 Case;\"\n- The following language is added to paragraph 4 of the PO Declaration, (Ex. A to the Protective Order): \"I hereby certify and agree [. . .]. I further certify that I will not use Designated Material for any purpose other than the Chapter 11 Case **or a Dispute related to the Chapter 11 Case**, and will not disclose or cause Designated Material to be disclosed for any purpose other than the Chapter 11 Case **or a Dispute related to the Chapter 11 Case**, and will not disclose or cause Designated Material to be disclosed to anyone not expressly permitted by the Order to receive Designated Material, **unless required to disclose or cause Designated Material to be disclosed under foreign law, but only after making reasonable efforts to comply with foreign law consistent with the Order**.\"\n\nThe Protective Order, as modified by this Order, is attached hereto as **Exhibit 1** to this Order. A redlined document highlighting the modifications to the Protective Order originally entered on October 6 is attached hereto as **Exhibit 2**; and it is further\n\nORDERED, to the extent that information subject to this Order that was previously designated (or will be designated) as Confidential or Highly Confidential under the Protective Order and/or the P.O. Addendum may be subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, *et al*., this Order constitutes an order of a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing the disclosure of such information to those persons specified in paragraph 9 of the Protective Order, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) and 12 C.F.R § 310.10(b); and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the relief requested in the Motion and the foregoing modifications and revisions to the Protective Order are applicable, in form and substance, to the P.O. Addendum, and to the extent of any conflicts between the provisions of this Order and the P.O. Addendum with respect to the use of Designated Material, including Discovery Material or Confidential Records produced by the FDIC-Receiver (as defined in the P.O. Addendum), then this Order shall control, but only to the extent of this Order's revisions to the Protective Order; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Trustee is authorized, subject to the protections provided under the Consent Order, in his discretion, to use and disclose the Privileged Materials in the course of prosecuting actions to recover property of the estate, including the K Legacy Action; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that this limited waiver of the Trustee Privileges (this \"Limited Privilege Waiver\") is expressly limited to the Privileged Materials: specifically, documents and information as to which a Trustee Privilege applies and which include facts and information underlying and related to the Debtor's financial affairs and assets, and fraudulent schemes, with respect to Golden Spring (New York) Ltd and Bravo Luck Limited; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that this Limited Privilege Waiver shall not operate as a waiver of any other Trustee Privileges not expressly contemplated herein, either in the K Legacy Action or in any other action, suit, dispute, investigation, or judicial process before the Bankruptcy Court or any other judicial body, entity, or individual; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that should the Trustee file a Privilege Waiver Motion in the future, if any, it shall be adjudicated on an expedited basis such that a response to any Privilege Waiver Motion must be made within seven days, and any reply within two days thereafter, and the Court shall then either rule on the papers or hold a hearing on the motion at its earliest convenience; and, for\n\nthe avoidance of doubt, the foregoing shall be without prejudice to the Trustee moving the Court to further expedite a hearing on a Privilege Waiver Motion, should the facts and circumstances warrant such relief; and it is further\n\nORDERED that the Trustee shall abide by the Consent Order and the Protective Order, to the extent allowable under foreign law; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Trustee is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief granted herein, including seeking entry of Foreign Protective Orders, if any; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of this Order.\n\nDated: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_, 2025\n\nJulie A. Manning, United States Bankruptcy Judge\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_","body_zh":"附件 1\n\n进一步修订的拟定裁定（未批注稿）\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　:　第 11 章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等1，　:　案号：22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。　:　（合并审理）\n\n关于批准第 11 章受托人依据《破产法典》第 105 条和第 107 条及《联邦民事诉讼规则》第 26(c) 条以及保护令约定附录 (I) 进一步修改 2022 年 10 月 6 日保护令，并依据关于控制与依据第 2004 条发出的传票所调取的文件及信息相关的律师-当事人保密特权及工作成果保护之同意令 (II) 放弃由受托人控制的债务人部分特权的动议的第二次修正［拟定］裁定 [ECF NO. 856]\n\n经审议《第 11 章受托人依据〈美国法典〉第 11 编第 105 条和第 107 条及〈联邦民事诉讼规则〉第 26(c) 条以及保护令约定附录 (I) 进一步修改 2022 年 10 月 6 日保护令，并依据关于控制与依据第 2004 条发出的传票所调取的文件及信息相关的律师-当事人保密特权及工作成果保护之同意令 (II) 放弃由受托人控制的债务人部分特权的动议 [ECF No. 856]》（以下简称“《动议》”）[2]，且已证明存在正当理由，并且本法院已审议\n\n1 本第 11 章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，又名 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及其他众多化名）（纳税人识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（纳税人识别号后四位：8202）以及 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 和 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（普衡律师事务所）, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 转交 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 破产财团的受托人（仅用于接收通知和通讯目的）。\n\n2 本文中使用但未另行定义的首字母大写术语具有《动议》中所规定的含义。\n\n对《动议》提出的任何及所有异议及其他答复，且本法院认定《动议》中请求的救济符合债务人破产财团及其债权人的最佳利益，并且本文所提供的救济经严格限缩以符合前述目的，据此，本法院特此\n\n裁定：《动议》按本文规定予以批准；并且进一步\n\n裁定：本法院此前于 2022 年 10 月 6 日作出的保护令\n\n[ECF No. 923] 修改如下：\n\n- 保护令第一项鉴于条款增加[3]以下表述：“鉴于，债务人已向本法院根据《美国法典》第 11 编第 101-1532 条（以下简称‘《破产法典》’）第 11 章提交了自愿申请（由该申请启动的案件简称‘第 11 章案件’）；且在本法院及其他法院、法庭或司法机构（包括在外国司法管辖区内）目前存在或可能存在司法或其他程序，包括但不限于依据《破产法典》产生或产生于该第 11 章案件中或与之相关的调查、争议事项、附随诉讼以及其他纠纷和诉讼（每一项称为一项‘纠纷’，统称‘诸项纠纷’）；”\n- 保护令第 1 段修改为以下内容：“本命令管辖一方当事人就本第 11 章案件及在本法院审理的相关纠纷披露或交换所有信息和文件……[.]”\n- 保护令第 8 段修改为以下内容：“对所有调证材料的使用和披露的一般限制：受托人在履行其根据《破产法典》和本案指定命令所承担的职责和责任时，和/或其他接收方，应仅在本法院为某项纠纷或第 11 章案件（包括在外国司法管辖区内的纠纷）之目的使用所有调证材料，但不得用于任何其他目的或在任何其他法庭中使用，包括不属于纠纷且与本第 11 章案件无关的任何其他诉讼或司法程序，或任何商业、竞争、政府、经营或行政目的或职能。”\n- 保护令第 9 段增加以下表述：“保密材料：保密材料及其包含的任何及所有信息，仅可向下列人员提供、出示、提供查阅或传达：……(c) 受托人已要求其签署附件 A 的在外国司法管辖区纠纷中的任何一方当事人，但须以受托人在该外国司法管辖区寻求作出与本命令一致且实质相似的保护令为前提（在外国法律允许的范围内）；以及……”\n\n3 对保护令的修改以粗体和下划线标出。\n命令并在实质上与本命令相似（在外国法律允许的范围内）；以及……”\n\n- 保护令第 10(a) 段增加以下表述：“下列人员的法律顾问以及在此类法律顾问明确指导下工作的工作人员：……iv. 受托人已要求其签署附件 A 的在外国司法管辖区纠纷中的任何一方当事人，但须以受托人在该外国司法管辖区寻求作出与本命令一致且实质相似的保护令为前提（在外国法律允许的范围内）；以及……”\n- 保护令第 10(g) 段增加以下表述：“在可能因纠纷或本第 11 章案件而产生的任何司法程序中的本法院、外国法院、法庭和/或司法机构及其官员和文书工作人员；”\n- 保护令声明（保护令附件 A）第 4 段增加以下表述：“我特此证明并同意[……]。我进一步证明，除第 11 章案件或与第 11 章案件相关的纠纷外，我不会将指定材料用于任何其他目的，且除第 11 章案件或与第 11 章案件相关的纠纷外，不会为任何目的披露或导致披露指定材料，且不会向本命令未明确允许接收指定材料的任何人披露或导致披露指定材料，除非外国法律要求披露或导致披露指定材料，但仅在作出符合本命令并遵守外国法律的合理努力之后方可进行。”\n\n经本裁定修改后的保护令作为本裁定附件 1 附于本文后。标明对原于 10 月 6 日作出的保护令所作修改的红线标出文件作为附件 2 附于本文后；并且进一步\n\n裁定：在受本命令管辖且此前根据保护令和/或保护令附录被指定（或将被指定）为保密或高度保密的信息可能受《1974 年隐私法》（5 U.S.C. § 552a 等）管辖的范围内，本命令构成管辖法院依据 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) 及 12 C.F.R § 310.10(b) 授权向保护令第 9 段所指明的人员披露此类信息的命令；并且进一步\n\n裁定：《动议》中请求的救济以及前述对保护令的修改和修订在形式和实质上均适用于保护令附录，并且如果本命令的规定与保护令附录关于使用指定材料（包括由 FDIC-Receiver（联邦存款保险公司接管人，定义见保护令附录）提供的调证材料或保密记录）的规定存在任何冲突，则以本命令为准，但仅限于本命令对保护令进行修订的范围；并且进一步\n\n裁定：在受同意令所提供保护的约束下，受托人有权自行决定在追收破产财团财产的诉讼（包括 K Legacy 诉讼）过程中使用和披露特权材料；并且进一步\n\n裁定：本项对受托人特权的有限放弃（以下简称“本有限特权放弃”）明确限于特权材料：具体而言，是指适用受托人特权且包含与 Golden Spring (New York) Ltd（金泉（纽约）有限公司）和 Bravo Luck Limited 相关的债务人财务事务、资产以及欺诈计划的基础事实及信息的文件和信息；并且进一步\n\n裁定：无论是在 K Legacy 诉讼中，还是在破产法院或任何其他司法机构、实体或个人面前进行的任何其他诉讼、官司、纠纷、调查或司法程序中，本有限特权放弃均不得视为对本文未明确预期的任何其他受托人特权的放弃；并且进一步\n\n裁定：如果受托人今后提交特权放弃动议（如有），该动议应按加急程序审理，即对任何特权放弃动议的答复必须在七日内提出，其后的任何答辩必须在两日内提出，随后法院应根据书面材料作出裁决，或在最早可行的时间就该动议举行听证会；并且，为\n\n免生疑问，若事实和情况支持此类救济，前述规定不妨碍受托人向法院提出动议以进一步加急举行特权放弃动议的听证会；并且进一步\n\n裁定：受托人应在外国法律允许的范围内遵守同意令及保护令；并且进一步\n\n裁定：本裁定的各项条款及条件在登记进入案卷后立即生效并具有执行力；并且进一步\n\n裁定：受托人有权采取一切必要行动以落实本文所批准的救济，包括寻求作出外国保护令（如有）；并且进一步\n\n裁定：本法院应保留对因本裁定的解释或执行而产生或与之相关的所有事项的管辖权。\n\n日期：______________，2025 年\n\nJulie A. Manning（朱莉·A·曼宁），美国联邦破产法官\n\n_______________________________________","key_entities":["Je","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Miles Guo","Despins","Paul Hastings"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":856,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":923,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":1713,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 12:59:38"}