{"id":"court_ctb_4434_3","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":4434,"sub_number":3,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":null,"title":"Exhibit 3 Further Revised Proposed Order (incremental redline)","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"## **Exhibit 3**\n\n**Further Revised Proposed Order (incremental redline)**\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>x |   |                         |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------|---|-------------------------|\n|                                                                  | : |                         |\n| In re:                                                           | : | Chapter 11              |\n|                                                                  | : |                         |\n| 1<br>HO WAN KWOK,<br>et al.,                                     | : | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM) |\n|                                                                  | : |                         |\n| Debtors.                                                         | : | (Jointly Administered)  |\n|                                                                  | : |                         |\n| -----------------------------------------------------------<br>x |   |                         |\n\n## **SECOND AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE TO (I) FURTHER MODIFY OCTOBER 6, 2022 PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 105 AND 107 OF BANKRUPTCY CODE AND FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(C) AND THE STIPULATED ADDENDUM TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND (II) WAIVE CERTAIN OF THE DEBTOR'S PRIVILEGES CONTROLLED BY THE TRUSTEE, PURSUANT TO THE CONSENT ORDER REGARDING CONTROL OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION RELATED TO RULE 2004 SUBPOENAED DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION [ECF NO. 856]**\n\nUPON CONSIDERATION OF the *Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee to (I) Further Modify October 6, 2022 Protective Order Entered Pursuant to Sections 105 and 107 of Title 11 of the United States Code and Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Stipulated Addendum to the Protective Order and (II) Waive Certain of the Debtor's Privileges Controlled By the Trustee, Pursuant to the Consent Order Regarding Control of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection Related to Rule 2004 Subpoenaed Documents and Information [ECF No. 856]* (the \"Motion\"),<sup>2</sup> and good cause having been shown, and the Court having\n\n<sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n<sup>2</sup> Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Motion.\n\nconsidered any and all objections and other responses to the Motion, and the Court finding that\n\nthe relief requested in the Motion is in the best interests of the Debtor's estate and its creditors,\n\nand the relief provided herein being narrowly tailored to serve the foregoing purposes, it is by the\n\nCourt, hereby\n\nORDERED, that the Motion is granted as set forth herein; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Protective Order previously entered by this Court on October 6,\n\n2022 [ECF No. 923] is modified as follows:\n\n- The following language is added<sup>3</sup> to the first Recital of the Protective Order: \"WHEREAS, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code, U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 (the \"Bankruptcy Code\"), in this Court (the case commenced by such petition, the \"Chapter 11 Case\"); and there are, or may be, judicial or other proceedings before this Court **and other courts, tribunals, or judicial bodies, including in foreign jurisdictions**, including but not limited to investigations, contested matters, adversary proceedings, and other disputes **and litigation** (each a \"Dispute\" and, collectively, the \"Disputes\") arising under the Bankruptcy Code or arising in or relating to the Chapter 11 Case;\"\n- Paragraph 1 of the Protective Order is revised to provide the following: \"This Order governs the disclosure or exchange of all information and documents in connection with this Chapter 11 Case and related Disputes **before this Court**, by a Party . . .[.]\"\n- Paragraph 8 of the Protective Order is revised to provide the following: \"General Limitations On Use And Disclosure Of All Discovery Material: All Discovery Material shall be used by the Trustee in carrying out his duties and responsibilities under the Bankruptcy Code and the appointment order in this case and/or by other Receiving Parties **solely in this Court** for the purposes of a Dispute or the Chapter 11 Case, **including a Dispute in a foreign jurisdiction**, **and but** not for any other purpose **or in any other forum**, including any other litigation or judicial proceedings that are not a Dispute and are not related to this Chapter 11 Case, or any business, competitive, governmental, commercial, or administrative purpose or function.\"\n- The following language is added to paragraph 9 of the Protective Order: \"Confidential Material: Confidential Material, and any and all information contained therein, may be given, shown, made available to, or communicated only\n\n<sup>3</sup> Revisions to the Protective Order are identified in **bold and underline**.\n\nto the following: . . . **(c) any Party to a Dispute in a foreign jurisdiction whom the Trustee has requested sign Exhibit A, subject to the Trustee seeking entry of a protective order in such foreign jurisdiction that is consistent with this Order and substantially similar hereto, to the extent allowable under foreign law; and** . . .\"\n\n- The following language is added to paragraph 10(a) of the Protective Order: \"counsel, and staff working under the express direction of such counsel, for: . . . **iv. any Party to a Dispute in a foreign jurisdiction whom the Trustee has requested sign Exhibit A, subject to the Trustee seeking entry of a protective order in such foreign jurisdiction that is consistent with this Order and substantially similar hereto, to the extent allowable under foreign law; and** . . .\"\n- The following language is added to paragraph 10(g) of the Protective Order \"the Court, **a foreign court, tribunal, and/or judicial body**, its officers, and clerical staff in any judicial proceeding that may result from a Dispute or this Chapter 11 Case;\"\n- The following language is added to paragraph 4 of the PO Declaration, (Ex. A to the Protective Order): \"I hereby certify and agree [. . .]. I further certify that I will not use Designated Material for any purpose other than the Chapter 11 Case **or a Dispute related to the Chapter 11 Case**, and will not disclose or cause Designated Material to be disclosed for any purpose other than the Chapter 11 Case **or a Dispute related to the Chapter 11 Case**, and will not disclose or cause Designated Material to be disclosed to anyone not expressly permitted by the Order to receive Designated Material, **unless required to disclose or cause Designated Material to be disclosed under foreign law, but only after making reasonable efforts to comply with foreign law consistent with the Order**.\"\n\nThe Protective Order, as modified by this Order, is attached hereto as **Exhibit 1** to this Order. A\n\nredlined document highlighting the modifications to the Protective Order originally entered on\n\nOctober 6 is attached hereto as **Exhibit 2**; and it is further\n\nORDERED, to the extent that information subject to this Order that was previously\n\ndesignated (or will be designated) as Confidential or Highly Confidential under the Protective\n\nOrder and/or the P.O. Addendum may be subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, *et*\n\n*al*., this Order constitutes an order of a court of competent jurisdiction authorizing the disclosure\n\nof such information to those persons specified in paragraph 9 of the Protective Order, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) and 12 C.F.R § 310.10(b); and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the relief requested in the Motion and the foregoing modifications and revisions to the Protective Order are applicable, in form and substance, to the P.O. Addendum, and to the extent of any conflicts between the provisions of this Order and the P.O. Addendum with respect to the use of Designated Material, including Discovery Material or Confidential Records produced by the FDIC-Receiver (as defined in the P.O. Addendum), then this Order shall control, but only to the extent of this Order's revisions to the Protective Order; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Trustee is authorized, subject to the protections provided under the Consent Order, in his discretion, to use and disclose the Privileged Materials in the course of prosecuting actions to recover property of the estate, including the K Legacy Action; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that this limited waiver of the Trustee Privileges (this \"Limited Privilege Waiver\") is expressly limited to the Privileged Materials: specifically, documents and information as to which a Trustee Privilege applies and which include facts and information underlying and related to the Debtor's financial affairs and assets, and fraudulent schemes, with respect to Golden Spring (New York) Ltd and Bravo Luck Limited; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that this Limited Privilege Waiver shall not operate as a waiver of any other Trustee Privileges not expressly contemplated herein, either in the K Legacy Action or in any other action, suit, dispute, investigation, or judicial process before the Bankruptcy Court or any other judicial body, entity, or individual; and it is further\n\n4\n\nORDERED, that should the Trustee file a Privilege Waiver Motion in the future, if any, it shall be adjudicated on an expedited basis such that a response to any Privilege Waiver Motion must be made within seven days, and any reply within two days thereafter, and the Court shall then either rule on the papers or hold a hearing on the motion at its earliest convenience; and, for the avoidance of doubt, the foregoing shall be without prejudice to the Trustee moving the Court to further expedite a hearing on a Privilege Waiver Motion, should the facts and circumstances warrant such relief; and it is further\n\nORDERED that the Trustee shall abide by the Consent Order and the Protective Order, to the extent allowable under foreign law; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Trustee is authorized to take all actions necessary to effectuate the relief granted herein, including seeking entry of Foreign Protective Orders, if any; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that the Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the interpretation or implementation of this Order.\n\nDated: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_, 2025\n\nJulie A. Manning, United States Bankruptcy Judge\n\n\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_","body_zh":"证物 3\n\n进一步修改的拟定裁定（增量修订标记）\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区破产法院布里奇波特分部）\n\nx\n\n关于：　:　第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等，　:　案号 22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。　:　（合并审理）\n\nx\n第二次修改的[拟定]裁定：批准第11章受托人提出的(I)进一步修改根据《破产法典》第105条和第107条及《联邦民事诉讼规则》第26(C)条作出的2022年10月6日保护令及保护令约定附录，以及(II)根据《关于涉及依第2004条传票调取的文件和信息的律师-委托人保密特权及工作成果保护控制权的同意裁定》[ECF NO. 856]放弃由受托人控制的债务人若干特权的动议\n\n经审议《第11章受托人关于(I)进一步修改根据〈美利坚合众国法典〉第11编第105条和第107条以及〈联邦民事诉讼规则〉第26(c)条作出的2022年10月6日保护令及保护令约定附录，以及(II)根据〈关于涉及依第2004条传票调取的文件和信息的律师-委托人保密特权及工作成果保护控制权的同意裁定〉[ECF No. 856]放弃由受托人控制的债务人若干特权的动议》（下称“动议”）2，且已证明有正当理由，并且法院已\n\n1 这些第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵，又名 Miles Guo、Miles Kwok 以及其他诸多化名）（纳税人识别号后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（纳税人识别号后四位：8202）和 Genever Holdings Corporation。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 和 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 破产财产的受托人（仅用于接收通知和通讯之目的）。\n\n2 本文中使用但未另行定义的首字母大写术语具有动议中所规定的含义。\n\n审议了对动议提出的任何及所有异议与其他回应，且法院认定\n\n动议中所请求的救济符合债务人破产财产及其债权人的最大利益，\n\n且本文所规定的救济系为达到上述目的而量身定制，本法院据此特此\n\n裁定：按本文所述批准该动议；并进一步\n\n裁定：本法院此前于2022年10月6日作出的保护令[ECF No. 923]修改如下：\n\n- 保护令的第一项叙意条款中增加3以下内容：“鉴于，债务人已向本法院根据《美利坚合众国法典》第11编（《破产法典》）U.S.C. §§ 101-1532 第11章提交了自愿申请（由该申请开启的案件下称‘第11章案件’）；并且在本法院以及包括外国司法管辖区在内的其他法院、法庭或司法机构面前，存在或可能存在依据《破产法典》产生或在第11章案件中产生或与之相关的司法或其他程序，包括但不限于调查、争议事项、对抗性程序以及其他争议和诉讼（各项单称‘争议’，统称‘各项争议’）；”\n- 保护令第1段修改如下：“本裁定管辖一方当事人在本法院就本第11章案件及相关争议披露或交换所有信息和文件 . . .[.]”\n- 保护令第8段修改如下：“关于所有证据开示材料的使用和披露的一般限制：受托人在履行其根据《破产法典》和本案指定裁定承担的职责和责任时，和/或由其他接收方，应仅在本法院为争议或第11章案件之目的（包括外国司法管辖区内的争议）使用所有证据开示材料，且不得出于任何其他目的或在任何其他法庭使用，包括非属争议且与本第11章案件无关的任何其他诉讼或司法程序，或任何商业、竞争、政府、经营或行政目的或职能。”\n- 保护令第9段增加以下内容：“保密材料：保密材料及其所包含的任何及所有信息，仅可提供、出示、使可获取或传达给以下人员：. . . (c) 受托人已要求其签署证物 A 的外国司法管辖区争议中的任何当事方，前提是受托人在该外国司法管辖区寻求作出在外国法允许范围内与本裁定一致且实质相似的保护令；以及 . . .”\n\n3 对保护令的修改以粗体和下划线标明。\n\n- 保护令第10(a)段增加以下内容：“以下人员的律师及在该等律师明确指示下工作的工作人员：. . . iv. 受托人已要求其签署证物 A 的外国司法管辖区争议中的任何当事方，前提是受托人在该外国司法管辖区寻求作出在外国法允许范围内与本裁定一致且实质相似的保护令；以及 . . .”\n- 保护令第10(g)段增加以下内容：“在因争议或本第11章案件可能引起的任何司法程序中的法院、外国法院、法庭和/或司法机构、其官员和文书人员；”\n- 保护令声明书（保护令证物 A）第4段增加以下内容：“我特此证明并同意 [. . .]。我进一步证明，我不会将指定材料用于第11章案件或与第11章案件相关的争议之外的任何目的，也不会为第11章案件或与第11章案件相关的争议之外的任何目的披露或导致披露指定材料，且不会向本裁定未明确允许接收指定材料的任何人披露或导致披露指定材料，除非根据外国法要求必须披露或导致披露指定材料，但仅在做出合理努力以符合本裁定一致的外国法之后方可进行。”\n\n经本裁定修改后的保护令作为本裁定的证物 1 附于本文后。一份标出对最初于10月6日作出的保护令的修改的修订标记文件作为证物 2 附于本文后；并进一步\n\n裁定：在受本裁定管辖且此前根据保护令和/或保护令附录已被指定（或将被指定）为保密或高度保密的信息可能受《1974年隐私法案》5 U.S.C. § 552a et al. 管辖的范围内，根据 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(11) 和 12 C.F.R § 310.10(b)，本裁定构成有管辖权法院授权向保护令第9段所指明的该等人员披露该等信息的裁定；并进一步\n\n裁定：动议中所请求的救济以及前述对保护令的修改和修订在形式和实质上均适用于保护令附录，且在本裁定条款与保护令附录之间就指定材料的使用（包括由 FDIC-Receiver（联邦存款保险公司作为接管人，定义见保护令附录）出示的证据开示材料或保密记录）发生任何冲突时，以本裁定为准，但仅限于本裁定对保护令进行修订的范围；并进一步\n\n裁定：在同意裁定所提供的保护前提下，受托人有权自行决定在追回破产财产诉讼（包括 K Legacy 诉讼）过程中使用和披露特权材料；并进一步\n\n裁定：对受托人特权的此项有限放弃（下称“本有限特权放弃”）明确限于特权材料：具体而言，指受托人特权所适用且包含与 Golden Spring (New York) Ltd 和 Bravo Luck Limited 相关的、债务人财务状况与资产以及欺诈计划的基础及相关事实和信息的文件和信息；并进一步\n\n裁定：本有限特权放弃不得构成对本文未明确预期的任何其他受托人特权的放弃，无论是在 K Legacy 诉讼中，还是在破产法院或任何其他司法机构、实体或个人面前的任何其他诉讼、案件、争议、调查或司法程序中；并进一步\n\n裁定：若受托人日后提交特权放弃动议（如有），该动议应按加急程序进行审理，对任何特权放弃动议的答复必须在七天内做出，随后的任何答辩应在两天内做出，法院随后应根据书面文件作出裁定，或在法院最早方便的时间就该动议举行听证会；且为免生疑问，若事实和情况支持此类救济，前述规定不影响受托人向法院提议进一步加急举行特权放弃动议听证会；并进一步\n\n裁定：受托人应在外国法允许的范围内遵守同意裁定和保护令；并进一步\n\n裁定：本裁定的条款和条件一经作出，应立即生效并具有可执行性；并进一步\n\n裁定：受托人获准采取一切必要行动以落实本文所准予的救济，包括寻求作出外国保护令（如有）；并进一步\n\n裁定：法院应对由本裁定的解释或执行所产生的或与之相关的所有事项保留管辖权。\n\n日期：______________，2025年\n\nJulie A. Manning，美国破产法官\n\n_______________________________________","key_entities":["Je","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Miles Guo","Despins","Paul Hastings"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":856,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":923,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":1710,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 12:59:50"}