{"id":"court_ctb_4628_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":4628,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2025-08-28","title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION | -------------------------------------------","summary_zh":"第11章信托人动议 —— Ho Wan Kwok 破产案（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo），CTB 22-50073 ECF #4628（2025-08-28立案）。第11章破产信托人 Luc A. Despins 动议请求法院出具裁定，补充、修改并取代此前的调解与撤销权诉讼程序令，设立协调一致的证据开示程序以减少重复取证，并批准相关撤销权被告介入统括性「另一个自我」（alter ego）诉讼以统一裁决实体归属问题。","summary_en":"Chapter 11 Trustee's Motion — In re Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui / Ho Wan Kwok), CTB 22-50073 ECF #4628 (filed 2025-08-28). Chapter 11 Trustee Luc A. Despins moves for an order to supplement, amend, and supersede prior mediation and avoidance litigation procedures, establish consolidated discovery procedures to streamline depositions and document exchange, and approve the intervention of avoidance defendants in omnibus alter ego actions.","body_en":"# **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| --------------------------------------------------------------- | x                                   |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|\n| In re:                                                          | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11<br>:           |\n| HO WAN KWOK, et al.,                                            | :<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)        |\n| Debtors.1                                                       | :<br>:<br>Jointly Administered<br>: |\n| --------------------------------------------------------------- | x                                   |\n\n# **CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER: (I) SUPPLEMENTING, AMENDING, AND SUPERSEDING (A) ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEDIATION, APPOINTING THE HONORABLE JAMES J. TANCREDI AS MEDIATOR, AND AMENDING ORDER APPROVING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO AVOIDANCE CLAIM ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS; AND (B) ORDER AMENDING ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEDIATION, APPOINTING THE HONORABLE JAMES J. TANCREDI AS MEDIATOR, AND AMENDING ORDER APPROVING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO AVOIDANCE CLAIM ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS TO FACILITATE CONSENSUAL PRE-LITIGATION AND PRE-APPEARANCE MEDIATION; AND (II) APPROVING INTERVENTION OF APPROPRIATE AVOIDANCE DEFENDANTS IN OMNIBUS ALTER EGO ACTIONS AS TO ALTER EGO CLAIMS AGAINST SPECIFIED ALTER EGO DEFENDANTS**\n\nLuc A. Despins, as chapter 11 trustee (the \"Trustee\") for Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\"), hereby respectfully moves (the \"Motion\") for entry of an order, in the form of the proposed order attached hereto as **Exhibit 1** (the \"Proposed Order\"), (i) supplementing, amending, and superseding (a) the Court's *Order Directing Parties to Mediation, Appointing the Honorable James J. Tancredi as Mediator, and Amending Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* [ECF No. 3163] (the \"Litigation Procedures Order\"); and (b) the Court's ordering amending the Litigation Procedures Order to approve procedures\n\n<span id=\"page-0-0\"></span><sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\napplicable to consensual pre-litigation and pre-appearance mediation [ECF No. 3465] (the \"Pre-Litigation Procedures Order\" and, together with the Litigation Procedures Order, collectively, the \"Procedures Orders\"); and (ii) approving the intervention of relevant Avoidance Defendants in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions. [2](#page-1-0) In support of this Motion, the Trustee states the following:\n\n#### **PRELIMINARY STATEMENT**\n\n1. This Motion requests the approval of Amended Avoidance Action Procedures, including appended Discovery Procedures (collectively, the \"Amended Procedures\"), governing litigation, mediation, and discovery in respect to the Trustee's Avoidance Claims.\n\n2. The Amended Procedures will streamline Mediation Proceedings, making the process voluntary and thus appropriately reserved for parties that are actively interested in pursuing settlement negotiation and thus most likely to benefit from Mediators' efforts.\n\n3. The Amended Procedures also adopt Discovery Procedures that are designed to provide for efficient discovery proceedings appropriate to the extraordinary circumstances of this Chapter 11 Case. Where appropriate, these procedures provide for coordination of discovery proceedings (and, in particular, depositions), calculated to minimize duplicative process.\n\n4. Finally, by this Motion, the Trustee requests that the Court (a) approve relevant Avoidance Defendants' intervention in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions as the sole mechanism for such defendants to dispute the Trustee's claims that certain entities (*i.e.*, the Specified Alter Ego Defendants) are alter egos of and/or that they or their property are equitably or beneficially owned by the Debtor (collectively, \"Alter Ego Claims\") by filing a Notice of Intervention in the appropriate Alter Ego Action on or before the later of: (a) thirty (30) days from the entry of the Proposed Order; or (b): in any Avoidance Action commenced after the filing of this Motion, sixty\n\n<span id=\"page-1-0\"></span><sup>2</sup> All capitalized terms not defined in this Motion adopt the terms defined in the Procedures Orders and the Proposed Order, as applicable.\n\n(60) days from service of the summons and adversary complaint, and order that all Avoidance Defendants (whether or not they have filed a Notice of Intervention) shall be bound by the Court's judgments in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions as to the Specified Alter Ego Defendants. [3](#page-2-0)\n\n5. Absent such an order, the Trustee expects that Avoidance Defendants will seek to re-litigate the Trustee's Alter Ego Claims against the Specified Alter Ego Defendants dozens (if not more) times in the hundreds of pending Avoidance Actions. To state the obvious, this would be substantially inefficient and result in waste of judicial and Estate resources.\n\n#### **BACKGROUND**\n\n6. On February 15, 2022 (the \"Petition Date\"), the Debtor filed with the Court a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n7. On March 21, 2022, the United States Trustee appointed an official committee of unsecured creditors (\"Committee\") in this Chapter 11 Case. No examiner has been appointed in the Chapter 11 Case.\n\n8. On June 15, 2022, the Court entered a memorandum of decision and order [ECF No. 465] (the \"Trustee Order\") directing the United States Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case. Pursuant to the Trustee Order, the United States Trustee selected Luc A. Despins as the Trustee.\n\n9. Since his appointment, the Trustee has investigated the Debtor's financial affairs, including, among other things, claims relating to prepetition transfers of interests of the Debtor in property and postpetition transfers of property of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate that were not\n\n<span id=\"page-2-0\"></span><sup>3</sup> By seeking this relief, the Trustee does not waive but rather expressly maintains his position that all of the Court's existing rulings that certain entities are alter egos of and/or equitably or beneficially owned by the Debtor are effective and binding against the Avoidance Defendants.\n\nauthorized by the Court or under the Bankruptcy Code (collectively, \"Avoidance Claims\") as well as other Estate Claims.\n\n10. On January 29, 2024, the Court entered its *Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* [ECF No. 2578] (the \"Original Procedures Order\"), establishing certain procedures governing litigation of the Avoidance Actions.\n\n11. Between February 9 and 15, 2024, the Trustee commenced an initial round of approximately 270 Avoidance Actions, *i.e.,* adversary proceedings to avoid and recover certain prepetition and postpetition transfers.\n\n12. On May 2, 2024, the Court entered its Litigation Procedures Order, amending and supplementing the Original Procedures Order, including, among other things, by adopting the Mediation Procedures. Approximately fifty (50) Avoidance Defendants are presently engaged in Mediation Proceedings with the Trustee supervised by Judge Tancredi.\n\n13. In addition to filing Avoidance Actions, the Trustee has also stipulated with numerous parties to toll the Trustee's statute of limitations to commence adversary proceedings against them. The Trustee is presently negotiating or otherwise communicating with these and other parties the Trustee believes may be subject to Estate Claims, as well as with counsel for Avoidance Defendants that have not yet appeared in the Avoidance Actions commenced by the Trustee (collectively, \"Counterparties\").\n\n14. To assist in resolution of Estate Claims, the Trustee requested, and the Court approved, the Pre-Litigation Procedures. The Pre-Litigation Procedures provide a process whereby the Trustee may undertake Mediation Proceedings with Counterparties prior to the Trustee commencing suit against them or with Avoidance Defendants the Trustee has sued but whose counsel have not yet appeared in this Court.\n\n4\n\n15. The Trustee has continued to file Avoidance Actions since the Trustee's initial filings in February 2024. To date, the Trustee has filed approximately 400 Avoidance Actions against nearly 500 Avoidance Defendants.\n\n#### **PROPOSED RELIEF**\n\n16. The Trustee proposes that the Court enter the Proposed Order amending and superseding the Procedures Orders in the following material respects:\n\n17. First, the Proposed Order provides for a single, simplified set of Mediation Procedures applicable to both appearing Avoidance Defendants (as provided in the Litigation Procedures Order) and non-appearing[4](#page-4-0) Avoidance Defendants and counterparties not yet sued by the Trustee (as provided in the Pre-Litigation Procedures Order). These simplified procedures also entrust to the Mediators' discretion the logistics and procedure of Mediation Proceedings and permit any party (*i.e.*, the Trustee or the applicable Avoidance Defendant or Counterparty) or the Mediator to terminate Mediation Proceedings at any time by filing a notice of termination.[5](#page-4-1) The lists of Stayed Avoidance Claims and Partially Stayed Avoidance Claims (*i.e.*, those claims specified in Exhibits 3-A and 3-B to the Amended Procedures) have also been revised; principally to reflect additional Avoidance Actions filed since April 2024 as well as amended complaints filed in certain pending actions.\n\n<span id=\"page-4-0\"></span><sup>4</sup> \"Non-appearing\" in this context refers to Avoidance Defendants whose counsel have contacted the Trustee and indicated interest in pursuing settlement but have not filed notices of appearance in the relevant Avoidance Actions. To be clear, where Avoidance Defendants do not appear and do not seek to negotiate a resolution with the Trustee, the Trustee has and will continue to pursue relief by default.\n\n<span id=\"page-4-1\"></span><sup>5</sup> Specifically, the amended procedures provide the Mediator discretion to determine (i) the length and schedule of any sessions, (ii) the order and format of presentations, (iii) the location of sessions and whether sessions are to be held in-person or via videoconference, (iv) whether the Mediating Parties shall be required to provide written submissions, and (v) who will attend mediation sessions. *See* Amended Procedures ¶ p.\n\n18. Second, the Proposed Order provides for the approval of Discovery Procedures pursuant to which the Trustee intends to undertake discovery with Avoidance Defendants. Among other things, these Discovery Procedures:\n\na. Provide for the Trustee to populate an electronic discovery Depository comprising documents subject to discovery by Avoidance Defendants. *See* Discovery Procedures ¶¶ 2-4. The Depository will be organized with Data Rooms covering subject matter foreseeably subject to discovery in Avoidance Actions. Avoidance Defendants seeking further written discovery from the Trustee shall first diligently seek to obtain documents and information from the Data Rooms and must make reasonable efforts to coordinate with other Avoidance Defendants when multiple Avoidance Defendants are seeking discovery as to the same or similar subject matter. *See id.* ¶ 6.\n\nb. Adopt a generally applicable Discovery Schedule in Avoidance Actions, subject to modification by up to ninety (90) days by stipulation of the parties and subject to further modification by order of the Court. *See id.* ¶ 5.\n\nc. Require Avoidance Defendants to coordinate in conducting deposition discovery including through omnibus deposition proceedings to minimize the risk that the same witnesses repeatedly deposed as to the same subject matter. *See id.* ¶ 10.\n\n19. Finally, the Proposed Order provides that Avoidance Defendants that have standing and that wish to dispute the Trustee's claims that certain defendants (*i.e.*, the Specified Alter Ego Defendants)[6](#page-5-0) in *Despins v. ACA Capital Group Ltd., et al.*, Adv. Proc. No. 24-05249 (the \"First\n\n<span id=\"page-5-0\"></span><sup>6</sup> The Specified Alter Ego Defendants are: G Club International Limited; G Club Operations LLC; Himalaya International Financial Group Limited; Himalaya International Reserves Limited; Himalaya International Clearing Limited; Himalaya International Payments Limited; Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.; ACA Capital Group Ltd.; Hamilton Capital Holding Limited; Hamilton Investment Management Limited; Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC; Anton Development Limited; Eastern Profit Corporation Limited; Gold Perfect Limited; Group Dynasty Limited; Joy Chance Holdings Limited; Pacific King Investment Limited; Strong Country\n\nOmnibus Alter Ego Action\"), and *AA Global Ventures Limited, et al.*, Adv Proc. No. 24-05233 (the \"Second Omnibus Alter Ego Action\" and, together with the First Omnibus Alter Ego Action, collectively, the \"Omnibus Alter Ego Actions\") are alter egos of and/or equitably or beneficially owned by the Debtor may intervene in the applicable Omnibus Alter Ego Action(s) and that, irrespective of such intervention, Avoidance Defendants shall be bound by any judgments entered in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions with respect to the Specified Alter Ego Defendants.\n\n#### **BASIS FOR REQUESTED RELIEF**\n\n20. The procedures in the Proposed Order provide orderly procedures for further litigation of the Trustee's Avoidance Claims.\n\n#### **A. Mediation Proceedings**\n\n21. Mediation Proceedings have provided the Trustee and Avoidance Defendants and Counterparties with a valuable resource to pursue negotiated resolutions of Avoidance Claims where the defendant is interested in doing so. The Trustee intends to continue to utilize Mediation Proceedings through the Mediation Procedures in the Amended Procedures.\n\n22. At the same time, some of the Avoidance Defendants presently referred to Mediation Proceedings have shown little if any interest in seeking to negotiate a settlement.\n\n23. To date, litigation of the Trustee's claims against Avoidance Defendants in Mediation Proceedings has been stayed; except for many of these defendants' participation in omnibus motion to dismiss briefing.[7](#page-6-0) Litigation should proceed with respect to Avoidance Defendants that are not interested in actively pursuing settlement through mediation. Moreover,\n\nHoldings Group Limited; AAGV Limited; Joincorp International Limited; Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited; and Ampleforth Capital Ltd.\n\n<span id=\"page-6-0\"></span><sup>7</sup> Certain Avoidance Defendants initially premised joint motion to dismiss briefing as a development that would assist the parties in making progress in settlement negotiations. However, after this Court ruled, rather than reengaging in Mediation Proceedings, most Avoidance Defendants unsuccessfully sought to pursue an interlocutory appeal in the District Court.\n\nvoluntary Mediation Proceedings will ensure that the valuable resource of the Mediators' time and attention are conserved for disputes where the parties are most likely to benefit (*i.e.*, those where the parties are actually interested in pursuing settlement).\n\n24. Under this revised structure, it is also sensible to defer to the Mediators' discretion as to matters of logistics and procedure (scheduling and format of proceedings, etc.). In any event, to date parties have generally deferred to the Mediators as to these matters and, where mutual interest exists in pursuing settlement negotiations, the parties have approached Mediation Proceedings cooperatively and with flexibility.\n\n#### **B. Discovery Procedures**\n\n25. The Court should also approve the proposed Discovery Procedures governing discovery proceedings in Avoidance Actions. The scope and complexities of the Debtor's fraudulent shell game are manifest, and the Trustee's investigation has amassed a trove of documents and information, much of which is likely subject to discovery in Avoidance Actions.\n\n26. Moreover, many Avoidance Actions will involve discovery as to similar or identical subject matter. Accordingly, the Trustee has proposed commonsense measures to institute efficiencies and, wherever possible, limit unnecessarily duplicative discovery proceedings.\n\n27. First, providing for the Trustee to produce documents by way of an electronic Depository organized into Data Rooms based on common subject matter, rather than on a defendant-by-defendant basis, will promote efficiency. [8](#page-7-0) It will also benefit Avoidance Defendants by offering them access to the Trustee's written production at the outset of discovery proceedings, without the need to serve written discovery.\n\n<span id=\"page-7-0\"></span><sup>8</sup> As discussed in the Discovery Procedures, *see* ¶ 5(a), the specific Data Rooms to which Avoidance Defendants are granted access will be determined on a Defendant-by-Defendant basis, based on the Avoidance Claims subject to litigation with respect to any defendant.\n\n28. Further efficiencies will be achieved and redundancies avoided by requiring Avoidance Defendants to meet and confer with the Trustee prior to serving Written Discovery Requests, and requiring defendants to look first to the Depository for documents and information and to reasonably coordinate with other Avoidance Defendants as to written discovery involving similar subject matter.\n\n29. These procedures are particularly appropriate here, where the vast majority of the Trustee's documents and information are not his own business documents but rather a collection of materials amassed in conducting a years'-long Bankruptcy Rule 2004 investigation.\n\n30. Second, the generally applicable Discovery Schedule, subject to extension on a claim-by-claim basis, will balance the efficiencies of uniform scheduling with flexibility to provide for adjustments where warranted. This procedure will also dispense with the need for the Court to hold many dozens of pretrial conferences for discovery scheduling in the near future.\n\n31. Third, by requiring parties engaged in discovery to coordinate in holding depositions, the Discovery Procedures will reduce the need for repetitive depositions. Allowing depositions to proceed in an uncoordinated manner risks numerous parties issuing deposition notices and subpoenas as to the same deponents. Not only would this waste the Trustee's time (and thus Estate resources), it would almost certainly lead to diminished cooperation by third-party witnesses, who, understandably, will not be inclined to repeatedly sit for depositions concerning the same subject matter.\n\n#### **C. Intervention Notices**\n\n32. Finally, the Court should order that Avoidance Defendants wishing to dispute the Trustee's claims that the Specified Alter Ego Defendants are the Debtor's alter egos and/or that they or their property are equitably or beneficially owned by the Debtor may do so only by timely\n\n9\n\nintervention in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions. The claims that the Trustee has asserted in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions underpin the Trustee's avoidance claims with respect to transfers made via the Specific Alter Ego Defendants. Indeed, for this reason, the Trustee's Avoidance Complaints asserting claims as to such transfers generally incorporate by reference the Trustee's adversary complaints filed in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions.\n\n33. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b), applicable to the Avoidance Actions pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 7024, provides for the Court to approve the permissive intervention of any party having \"a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact.\"\n\n34. In the absence of a single forum to adjudicate the Trustee's claims against the Specified Alter Ego Defendants, the Trustee expects that numerous Avoidance Defendants may seek to re-litigate the same legal and factual disputes in dozens of Adversary Proceedings. The result would impose substantial unnecessary costs and delays on the parties and the Court and risks creating myriad repetitive proceedings. For the avoidance of doubt, Avoidance Defendants will be bound by any ruling as to the Specified Alter Ego Defendants in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions whether or not the Trustee's claims against the Avoidance Defendants are otherwise stayed for any reason (including, without limitation, because they are listed on Exhibits 3-A or 3-B to the Amended Procedures or because they are subject to Mediation Proceedings).\n\n35. To be clear, the right to intervene should be limited to Avoidance Defendants that possess standing to dispute these matters (*i.e.*, where the Trustee has asserted that transfers were made to the Avoidance Defendants via one or more Specified Alter Ego Defendants). Accordingly, the Court should permit the Trustee to object to any Notice of Intervention where the Avoidance Defendant at issue lacks standing. [9](#page-10-0)\n\n#### **MEET-AND-CONFER PROCESS**\n\n36. On or before June 17, 2025, the Trustee filed an initial draft of the Amended Procedures in all Avoidance Actions pending at that time. In doing so, the Trustee solicited feedback from all Avoidance Defendants as to the proposed revised procedures.\n\n37. The Trustee has considered written feedback from more than two dozen Avoidance Defendants. The Trustee has also held multiple, lengthy meet-and-confer sessions with counsel for nearly 20 Avoidance Defendants.\n\n38. Through this process, in consideration of the feedback received, the Trustee has made numerous and substantial adjustments to the Amended Procedures (and, in particular, the proposed Discovery Procedures). Indeed, last month the Trustee circulated a revised draft of the Amended Procedures to Avoidance Defendants that initially submitted comments, which draft the Trustee has still further revised in consideration of additional feedback.\n\n#### **NOTICE AND NO PRIOR REQUEST**\n\n39. The Trustee will file this Motion, and any notice or order scheduling a hearing on this Motion (the \"Hearing Notice\"), in: (a) the Chapter 11 Case, (b) all pending Avoidance Actions (whether or not stayed), and (c) the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions. Notice will thus be given to all appearing parties in these proceedings eligible to receive electronic notice. The Trustee will also send the Motion and any Hearing Notice via U.S. Mail to all non-appearing Avoidance Defendants.\n\n<span id=\"page-10-0\"></span><sup>9</sup> By seeking this relief, the Trustee does not waive but rather expressly maintains his position that all of the Court's existing rulings that certain entities are alter egos of and/or equitably or beneficially owned by the Debtor are effective and binding against the Avoidance Defendants.\n\nThe foregoing constitutes due and sufficient notice, and the Trustee submits that no further notice should be required.\n\n40. No other or prior motion for the relief sought herein has been made to this Court or any other Court.\n\n*[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK.]*\n\n**WHEREFORE**, the Court should grant this Motion by entry of the Proposed Order and\n\ngrant such other and further relief as is just and proper.\n\nDated: August 28, 2025 New Haven, Connecticut\n\nBy: */s/ Patrick R. Linsey*\n\nPatrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n*and*\n\nNicholas A. Bassett *(*admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n*and*\n\nDouglass Barron (admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6690 aviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n*Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 4628 Filed 08/28/25 Entered 08/28/25 16:20:57 Page 14 of 53\n\n# **EXHIBIT 1**\n\n**(Proposed Order)**\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| --------------------------------------------------------------- | x                                   |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|\n| In re:                                                          | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11                |\n| HO WAN KWOK, et al.,                                            | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)   |\n| Debtors.1                                                       | :<br>:<br>Jointly Administered<br>: |\n| --------------------------------------------------------------- | x                                   |\n\n#### **[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING**\n\n# **CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER: (I) SUPPLEMENTING, AMENDING, AND SUPERSEDING (A) ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEDIATION, APPOINTING THE HONORABLE JAMES J. TANCREDI AS MEDIATOR, AND AMENDING ORDER APPROVING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO AVOIDANCE CLAIM ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS; AND (B) ORDER AMENDING ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO MEDIATION, APPOINTING THE HONORABLE JAMES J. TANCREDI AS MEDIATOR, AND AMENDING ORDER APPROVING PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO AVOIDANCE CLAIM ADVERSARY PROCEEDINGS TO FACILITATE CONSENSUAL PRE-LITIGATION AND PRE-APPEARANCE MEDIATION; AND (II) APPROVING INTERVENTION OF APPROPRIATE AVOIDANCE DEFENDANTS IN OMNIBUS ALTER EGO ACTIONS AS TO ALTER EGO CLAIMS AGAINST SPECIFIED ALTER EGO DEFENDANTS**\n\nUpon the motion (the \"Motion\") of Luc A. Despins, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee (the \"Trustee\") for Ho Wan Kwok (the \"Debtor\"), for entry of an order (this \"Order\") (i) supplementing, amending, and superseding (a) the Court's *Order Directing Parties to Mediation, Appointing the Honorable James J. Tancredi as Mediator, and Amending Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* [ECF No. 3163] (the \"Litigation Procedures Order\"); and (b) the Court's ordering amending the Litigation Procedures\n\n<span id=\"page-14-0\"></span><sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\nOrder to approve procedures applicable to consensual pre-litigation and pre-appearance mediation [ECF No. 3465] (the \"Pre-Litigation Procedures Order\" and, together with the Litigation Procedures Order, collectively, the \"Procedures Orders\"); and (ii) approving the intervention of relevant Avoidance Defendants in *Despins v. ACA Capital Group Ltd., et al.*, Adv. Proc. No. 24- 05249 (the \"First Omnibus Alter Ego Action\"), and/or *AA Global Ventures Limited, et al.*, Adv Proc. No. 24-05233 (the \"Second Omnibus Alter Ego Action\" and, together with the First Omnibus Alter Ego Action, collectively, the \"Omnibus Alter Ego Actions\") for certain purposes; and the Court having found that the relief requested in the Motion is in the best interest of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate, its creditors, and all parties in interest; and due and sufficient notice of the Motion having been given under the particular circumstances; and it appearing that no other or further notice need be given; and upon proceedings at a hearing held on \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ \\_\\_, 2025; and any objections to the relief requested herein having been withdrawn or overruled on the merits; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED THAT:\n\n1. The Motion is granted as set forth herein.\n\n2. The *Amended Avoidance Litigation and Mediation Procedures*, including, without limitation, the appended Discovery Procedures (collectively, the \"Amended Procedures\") appended hereto as **Exhibit A** are hereby approved and so ordered.[2](#page-15-0)\n\n3. This Order and the Amended Procedures appended hereto shall amend and supersede the existing Procedures Orders.\n\n4. On or before the later of: (a) thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order; or (b): in any Avoidance Action commenced after the filing of the Motion, sixty (60) days from service of the summons and adversary complaint, any Avoidance Defendant wishing to dispute the Trustee's\n\n<span id=\"page-15-0\"></span><sup>2</sup> Capitalized terms not expressly defined in this Order shall adopt the meanings ascribed to them in the Amended Procedures.\n\nclaims that any of G Club International Limited; G Club Operations LLC; Himalaya International Financial Group Limited; Himalaya International Reserves Limited; Himalaya International Clearing Limited; Himalaya International Payments Limited; Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.; ACA Capital Group Ltd.; Hamilton Capital Holding Limited; Hamilton Investment Management Limited; Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC; Anton Development Limited; Eastern Profit Corporation Limited; Gold Perfect Limited; Group Dynasty Limited; Joy Chance Holdings Limited; Pacific King Investment Limited; Strong Country Holdings Group Limited; AAGV Limited; Joincorp International Limited; Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited; and/or Ampleforth Capital Ltd. (collectively, the \"Specified Alter Ego Defendants\") are alter egos of and/or that they or their property are equitably or beneficially owned by the Debtor (such claims, collectively, \"Alter Ego Claims\") shall file a *Notice of Intervention* in the Omnibus Alter Ego Action in which such claims are pending. The Notice of Intervention shall identify the intervening Avoidance Defendant and identify the specific Alter Ego Claims as to which the Avoidance Defendant seeks to intervene.\n\n5. The intervening Avoidance Defendant's right to participate in proceedings in Omnibus Alter Ego Actions shall be limited to those claims that the Avoidance Defendant has identified and has standing to dispute. No Notice of Intervention shall be effective unless timely filed.\n\n6. Within thirty (30) days of the filing of any Notice of Intervention, the Trustee may object to an Avoidance Defendant's intervention in an Omnibus Alter Ego Action by filing an objection in the relevant Omnibus Alter Ego Action for the following reasons: (a) the Trustee disputes the Avoidance Defendant's standing to participate in the Omnibus Alter Ego Action or the scope of intervention described in the Notice of Intervention exceeds such standing; or (b) the Notice of Intervention is untimely. Following the filing of such an objection, the relevant Avoidance Defendant may file a reply withing fourteen (14) days, following which the Court shall resolve the Trustee's objection. In the absence of an objection by the Trustee, the Avoidance Defendant's intervention in the Omnibus Alter Ego Action to the extent described in the Notice of Intervention shall be deemed approved.\n\n7. Any judgments entered in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions with respect to the Specified Alter Ego Defendants shall be binding on all Avoidance Defendants, irrespective of whether an Avoidance Defendant filed a Notice of Intervention in the relevant Omnibus Alter Ego Action. For the avoidance of doubt, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Amended Procedures, this shall include Avoidance Defendants against which the Trustee's Avoidance Claims are otherwise stayed.\n\n8. The Court retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the implementation of this Order.\n\n9. This Order shall be effective immediately upon entry.\n\n# **Exhibit A**\n\n**(Amended Avoidance Litigation and Mediation Procedures)**\n\n### **Amended Avoidance Litigation and Mediation Procedures**\n\na. The Amended Avoidance Action Procedures (as may be further amended, the \"Amended Procedures\") shall apply to: (i) any adversary proceedings commenced by the Trustee on or after February 1, 2024, in which the Trustee asserts claims solely under sections 544, 547, 548, 549, and 550 of the Bankruptcy Code and analogous claims under applicable state law (the \"Avoidance Actions\"); and/or (ii) in respect to Mediation Procedures (as defined herein) to any claims asserted or that may be asserted by the Trustee.\n\nb. Upon filing a complaint commencing any Avoidance Action (an \"Avoidance Complaint\"), the Trustee shall file a *Notice of Applicability of Amended Avoidance Litigation and Mediation Procedures* in a form substantially similar to that attached hereto as **Exhibit 1** (the \"Amended Procedures Notice\"). The Trustee shall serve a copy of the Amended Procedures Notice on each defendant in an Avoidance Action (an \"Avoidance Defendant\") together with the Summons and Avoidance Complaint pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7004.\n\nc. Motions affecting multiple Avoidance Actions shall be filed in each applicable Avoidance Action and shall use a caption substantially in the form attached hereto as **Exhibit 2**.\n\nd. To the extent that an Avoidance Complaint (including exhibits) contains information that is designated confidential or highly confidential pursuant to the amended Protective Order [Main Case ECF Nos. 923, 3264, 4448] (as may be further modified, the \"Protective Order\") and the amended Stipulated Addendum to Protective Order [Main Case ECF Nos. 2460, 3264, 4448] (as may be further modified, the \"P.O. Addendum\"), the Trustee may file the Avoidance Complaint under seal (a \"Sealed Avoidance Complaint\"), *provided, however*, the Trustee shall file unsealed a copy of the Avoidance Complaint that redacts any information that is designated confidential or highly confidential (a \"Redacted Avoidance Complaint\"). Service of a Redacted Avoidance Complaint shall constitute sufficient service of a complaint as required by Bankruptcy Rule 7004. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Protective Order and the P.O. Addendum, upon any Avoidance Defendant and its counsel each executing copies of Exhibit A to the Protective Order and, if applicable, Exhibit A to the P.O. Addendum (a \"P.O. Consent\"), the Trustee may provide a copy of the unredacted Avoidance Complaint to such Avoidance Defendant. Following the appearance of any self-represented Avoidance Defendant, such Avoidance Defendant shall confer with counsel for the Trustee and advise whether they prefer to receive notice by email or by U.S. Mail and the Trustee shall provide any required notices to the self-represented Avoidance Defendant consistent with their stated preference.\n\ne. An Avoidance Defendant's time to respond to any Avoidance Complaint (the \"Response Date\") shall be sixty (60) days from the date that service is effected on such Avoidance Defendant, *provided, however*, that, without further order of the Court, the Trustee and any Avoidance Defendant may stipulate to further extend the defendant's Response Date up to ninety (90) additional days. Any such stipulation shall be made in writing and the Trustee shall file such stipulation or otherwise shall file a notice of the stipulated extension on the docket in the applicable Avoidance Action. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary:\n\ni. The claims against Avoidance Defendants set forth on **Exhibit 3-A** attached hereto (the \"Stayed Avoidance Claims\") shall be stayed pending further order of the Court. At such time that the stay of the Stayed Avoidance Claims is lifted, the Court shall determine whether the Stayed Avoidance Claims shall be subject to the Mediation Procedures and set deadlines for Avoidance Defendants in such actions to respond to the Avoidance Complaints. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding such stay, certain aspects of Stayed Avoidance Claims may be subject to litigation and binding adjudication through the procedure described in the Court's Order approving these Amended Procedures (*i.e.*, in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions, as defined in the Court's Order).\n\nii. The claims against Avoidance Defendants set forth on **Exhibit 3-B** attached hereto (the \"Partially Stayed Avoidance Claims\") shall be stayed pending further order of the Court solely as to any legal or factual issues concerning whether AA Global Ventures Limited; AAGV Limited; Alzarro Enterprises Ltd.; Ampleforth Capital Ltd.; Assets Sino Limited; Auspicious Coast Limited; BSA Strategic Fund I; Canadian Agri-product Monetary Investments Limited; Crane Advisory Group LLC; Delta Konsult Limited; Eagle Eye Investments Limited; Fiesta Investment Ltd.; Glory Asia (H.K.) Limited; Gold Perfect Limited; Group Dynasty Limited; GS Security Solutions Inc.; Guang Hong Limited; H Reserve Management Limited; Head Win Group Limited; Holy City Hong Kong Ventures Limited; Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited; Hudson Diamond Holdings, Inc.; Infinity Treasury Management Inc.; Insight Phoenix Fund; Joincorp International Limited; Joy Chance Holdings Limited; Kingdom Rich Limited; Long Gate Limited; New Miracle Limited; Pacific King Investment Limited; Rich Group Development Limited; Rising Sun Capital Ltd.; River Valley Operations LLC; Sail Victory Limited; Strong Country Holdings Group Limited; Thousand Stars Company Limited; New Dynamic Development Limited; ACA Capital Group Ltd, Anton Development Limited, G Club International Limited, G Club Operations LLC, G Fashion, G Fashion Media Group Inc., GFNY Inc., Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd, Himalaya International Clearing Ltd, Leading Shine Limited, Rule of Law Foundation III Inc., Rule of Law Society IV Inc., Saraca Media Group Inc., AA Global Ventures Limited, AAGV Limited, Alzarro Enterprises Ltd., Ampleforth Capital Ltd., Assets Sino Limited, Auspicious Coast Limited, BSA Strategic Fund I, Canadian Agriproduct Monetary Investments Limited, Crane Advisory Group LLC, Delta Konsult Limited, Eagle Eye Investments Limited, Fiesta Investment Ltd., Glory Asia (H.K.) Limited, Gold Perfect Limited, Group Dynasty Limited, GS Security Solutions Inc., Guang Hong Limited, H Reserve Management Limited, Head Win Group Limited, HGA Property Operation LLC, Holy City Hong Kong Ventures Limited, Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited, Hudson Diamond Holdings, Inc., Infinity Treasury Management Inc., Insight Phoenix Fund, Joincorp International Limited, Joy Chance Holdings Limited, Kingdom Rich Limited, Long Gate Limited, New Miracle Limited, Pacific King Investment Limited, Rich Group Development Limited, Rising Sun Capital Ltd., River Valley Operations LLC, Sail Victory\n\nLimited, Strong Country Holdings Group Limited, and/or Thousand Stars Company Limited were alter-egos of the Debtor and/or whether the property of such entities was property of the Debtor and/or of the Debtor's chapter 11 estate (collectively, the \"Stayed Issues\"). For the avoidance of doubt, Stayed Issues may be mediated on a voluntary basis and may also be subject to litigation and binding adjudication through the procedure described in the Court's Order approving these Amended Procedures (*i.e.*, in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions, as defined in the Court's Order).\n\niii. Upon or after the filing of any new Avoidance Action, the Trustee may designate claims in such action to be Stayed Avoidance Claims or Partially Stayed Avoidance Claims by filing a notice of such designation (a \"Stay Designation Notice\") in the relevant Avoidance Action. Any Avoidance Defendant wishing to challenge a Stay Designation Notice shall file a response to such notice in the relevant Avoidance Action within seven (7) days of appearing in same, to which the Trustee may reply within fourteen (14) days of the filing of such response. Any disputes over a Stay Designation Notice shall be determined by the Court.\n\nf. In the event that any Avoidance Defendant responds to an Avoidance Complaint by filing a motion pursuant to Civil Rule 12, the Trustee shall have sixty (60) days to respond to such motion, *provided, however*, if such a motion is filed with respect to claims that are stayed or with respect to claims that become stayed while such a motion is pending, the Trustee shall have sixty (60) days to respond to such motion following the termination of the stay. An Avoidance Defendant shall have thirty (30) days to reply to any response by the Trustee to a motion filed pursuant to Civil Rule 12.\n\ng. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no initial pretrial conference pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7016 will be held prior to discovery in any Avoidance Action and, accordingly, the Summons issued by the Clerk of the Court and served by the Trustee will not include a date for a pretrial conference. To the extent that a party to an Avoidance Action believes that a pretrial conference is necessary to address scheduling or other issues, any party may request such a conference at any time by filing a request on the docket in the Avoidance Action.\n\nh. Discovery in any Avoidance Action as to any claims that are not stayed shall be conducted pursuant to the discovery procedures (the \"Discovery Procedures\") appended hereto as **Exhibit 4**. Civil Rule 26 (to the extent incorporated by Bankruptcy Rule 7026), and District of Connecticut Local Civil Rule 7026-1, shall apply to the Avoidance Actions, except to the extent that they are expressly modified by the Amended Procedures (including, without limitation, the appended Discovery Procedures). For the avoidance of doubt, the stay effective during Mediation Proceedings shall include all formal discovery but shall not preclude any informal exchange of documents or information on a voluntary basis or as an Assigned Mediator (as defined herein) may direct.\n\ni. Any party to an Avoidance Action may request that these Amended Procedures be modified as applied in such Avoidance Action for good cause shown. Such modification shall be requested by motion filed in the applicable Avoidance Action.\n\nj. Any claims asserted or that may be asserted by the Trustee, including, without limitation, Avoidance Claims, shall be subject to the following procedures described in paragraphs (k) through (w) herein governing mediation proceedings (the \"Mediation Procedures\").\n\nk. The Trustee and any other party the Trustee believes may be subject to claims owned by the Estate (a \"Counterparty\") may stipulate (a \"Mediation Stipulation\") to refer the Trustee's claims against such Counterparty (the \"Mediated Claims\") to non-binding mediation proceedings (as set forth herein, the \"Mediation Proceedings\"). Mediation Stipulations shall be made as follows:\n\ni. Mediation Stipulations shall be made in writing signed by the Trustee and the applicable Counterparty and shall confirm that the Trustee and the Counterparty consent to the Mediation Procedures.\n\nii. Mediation Stipulations in pending Avoidance Actions shall be filed in the applicable Avoidance Action.\n\niii. Mediation Stipulations shall be submitted to Judge Tancredi (a \"Mediation Referral\") with joint correspondence (whether by letter or by email) to Judge Tancredi's mediation email address attaching the applicable Mediation Stipulation and briefly (and in a non-argumentative manner) describing the Mediated Claims.\n\nl. If the Trustee has already commenced litigation against a Counterparty at the time that the Trustee and the Counterparty (collectively, the \"Mediating Parties\") execute the Mediation Stipulation, litigation shall be stayed (including, without limitation, as to such Counterparty's obligation to respond to the Avoidance Complaint) until the conclusion of Mediation Proceedings. If any litigation deadlines would otherwise expire during Mediation Proceedings or within thirty (30) days following the termination thereof, such deadlines shall be suspended until the first business day that is thirty (30) days following the termination of Mediation Proceedings, *provided, however*, as to any deadline for the Trustee to respond to a motion filed pursuant to Civil Rule 12 prior to or during Mediation Proceedings, the Trustee's deadline to respond to such motion shall be the first business day that is sixty (60) days following the termination of Mediation Proceedings. For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding such stay, certain aspects of Mediated Claims may be subject to litigation and binding adjudication through the procedure described in the Court's Order approving these Amended Procedures (*i.e.*, in the Omnibus Alter Ego Actions, as defined in the Court's Order).\n\nm. United States Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi (\"Judge Tancredi\") has been appointed as the lead mediator, *see* original *Order Directing Parties to Mediation, Appointing the Honorable James J. Tancredi as Mediator, and Amending Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings* [Main Case ECF No. 3163], and shall continue to oversee all Mediation Proceedings, *provided, however*, mediations shall be conducted by Judge Tancredi or by a mediator from an approved panel of mediators (the \"Mediation Panel\"). The members of the Mediation Panel shall be selected by Judge Tancredi, subject to the Court's approval of the appointment of each such mediator and rates of compensation applicable to same. For the avoidance of doubt, the Trustee or any Counterparty may suggest potential mediators for appointment to the Mediation Panel to Judge Tancredi and Judge Tancredi may in his discretion consult with the Trustee or such Counterparty regarding their suggestions. The Trustee shall request the Court's approval of mediators selected by Judge Tancredi by filing a motion in the Main Case only with notice filed in any pending Avoidance Actions, and the appointment of a mediator to the Mediation Panel shall become effective upon approval by the Court following the Court's consideration of the motion and any objections or responses to same. All matters concerning the responsibility of parties to Mediation Proceedings to compensate any Assigned Mediator shall be reserved pending the assignment of any mediators to a Mediation Panel that require compensation, if any.\n\nn. Upon a Mediation Referral, Judge Tancredi shall assign the Mediated Claims to be mediated by himself or by a member of the Mediation Panel (the \"Assigned Mediator\"). Judge Tancredi may also order that related Mediation Proceedings (including, where appropriate, where claims are asserted against multiple defendants in a single Avoidance Action) be consolidated. Upon notification of their assignment, the Assigned Mediator shall determine whether they have any conflicts with respect to the Mediated Claims and, in the event of a conflict, shall recuse themself and not act in the particular mediation unless such conflict is disclosed to and expressly waived by the Mediating Parties. If the Assigned Mediator is recused, Judge Tancredi shall assign an alternative mediator from the Mediation Panel or shall assign himself to the mediation. If a Mediating Party believes that a conflict of interest precludes the service of the Assigned Mediator or otherwise opposes the assignment of the Assigned Mediator, such party may seek the assignment of a different Assigned Mediator by letter submitted to Judge Tancredi through his mediation email address (with copies to the opposing party and the Assigned Mediator).\n\no. All proceedings and writings incident to Mediation Proceedings shall be considered privileged and confidential and subject to all protections of Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and shall not be reported or admitted as evidence for any reason except to prove that a party failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. No stenographic, written, electronic, or any other form of recording or internet posting shall be made at any time during or after the Mediation Proceedings except to memorialize a definitive settlement agreement approved by Judge Tancredi. Judge Tancredi (including, without limitation, in his capacity as lead mediator and as an Assigned Mediator), any other Assigned Mediator, and their respective agents, shall have absolute judicial immunity as provided under state, federal, and common law, from liability for any act or omission in connection with the Mediation Proceedings, and from compulsory process to testify or produce documents in connection with the Mediation Proceedings except as set forth in this paragraph, and shall be held harmless by all Mediating Parties. Neither any Assigned Mediator nor Judge Tancredi shall be subpoenaed or called as a witness or expert by any party except as set forth in this paragraph. No party shall attempt to compel the testimony of, or compel the production of documents from, the Assigned Mediator (including his/her agents, partners, or employees of their respective law firms or organizations) or Judge Tancredi (including his agents, partners, or employees), *provided, however*, subject to Court order, the Assigned Mediator or Judge Tancredi may be called as a witness by any party and may be compelled to testify on a limited basis in\n\nproceedings where it is alleged that a party failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. Any documents provided to the Assigned Mediator or Judge Tancredi by the parties shall be destroyed within thirty (30) days after the termination of Mediation Proceedings unless the Court orders otherwise.\n\np. The Assigned Mediator shall preside over any mediation sessions and the rules of evidence shall not apply. The Assigned Mediator shall determine the format of any mediation sessions, including, without limitation, (i) the length and schedule of any sessions, (ii) the order and format of presentations, (iii) the location of sessions and whether sessions are to be held inperson or via videoconference, (iv) whether the Mediating Parties shall be required to provide written submissions, and (v) whether counsel only and/or client representatives with authority to settle Mediated Claims shall be required to attend mediation sessions. The Assigned Mediator may implement any procedures which are reasonable and practical under the circumstances. Judge Tancredi is authorized to seek any amendments to the Mediation Procedures during the Mediation Proceedings that he believes are necessary to assist with the mediation. Any Mediating Party may communicate *ex-parte* with the Assigned Mediator to the extent that their Assigned Mediator deems appropriate. The Trustee and his counsel may communicate *ex-parte* with Judge Tancredi concerning the implementation of these Mediation Procedures, the selection of mediators to the Mediation Panel, the categorization of Avoidance Actions, and/or any recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi to the Court.\n\nq. Mediating Parties shall participate in Mediation Proceedings pursuant to the Mediation Procedures and as directed by the applicable Assigned Mediator in good faith and with a view toward reaching a consensual resolution. An Assigned Mediator may report any noncompliance with the Mediation Procedures to the Court by a written notice, which Judge Tancredi shall cause to be filed in any applicable adversary proceeding or otherwise in the Main Case. If a Mediating Party fails to comply with the Mediation Procedures, the Court may (with or without the filing of a motion by any party) schedule a hearing to consider the appropriateness of sanctions against the noncompliant party. Such sanctions may include, without limitation, assessing costs of the Mediation Proceedings and/or the opposing party's attorneys' fees against the noncompliant party. Additionally, in cases of willful, persistent, or egregious noncompliance, the Court may enter a default judgment or dismissal against the party that failed to comply with the Mediation Procedures. Failure to achieve settlement and/or termination of Mediation Proceedings alone cannot constitute grounds for a finding of \"bad faith\" or the imposition of sanctions. An Assigned Mediator (other than Judge Tancredi) may at any time and for any reason recommend to Judge Tancredi that Mediation Proceedings as to any Mediated Claims be reassigned.\n\nr. If Mediation Proceedings are successful in achieving a settlement of the Mediated Claims, in whole or in part, the Assigned Mediator shall prepare a report (the \"Mediator's Report\") indicating whether the Mediating Parties adhered to these Mediation Procedures. The Assigned Mediator may, but shall not be required, to indicate in such Mediator's Report whether the Assigned Mediator believes that the proposed settlement that the economics and terms of the settlement agreement are fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the Chapter 11 estate as measured by the standards of *In re Iridium Operating LLC*, 478 F.3d 452, 462 (2d Cir. 2007). If the Mediated Claims are the subject of a pending adversary proceeding, Judge Tancredi shall cause the Mediator's Report to be filed in the applicable adversary proceeding. If the Mediated Claims are not the subject of a pending adversary proceeding, the Assigned Mediator shall transmit the Mediator's Report to the Trustee and the Trustee shall provide a copy of such report to the applicable Counterparty. The Mediator's Report shall not address the substance of mediation discussions or provide details of any settlement that might be reached.\n\ns. The Trustee shall file a motion requesting Court approval as soon as practicable following the issuance of any Mediator's Report indicating a full or partial settlement. The Trustee may submit a motion seeking such approval under seal (with access limited to the Trustee, the relevant Counterparty, counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, and the United States Trustee) to the extent the Trustee believes that public disclosure of the settlement terms would harm the estate and/or would implicate commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential information public disclosure of which would prejudice parties to the settlement. Where a motion is filed under seal, the Trustee shall file on the public docket a copy of the motion that redacts any commercially sensitive or otherwise confidential information.\n\nt. Members of the Mediation Panel shall regularly consult with Judge Tancredi concerning the status of Mediation Proceedings to which they are assigned. Judge Tancredi may submit reports to the Court regarding the progress of Mediation Proceedings and any recommendations of Judge Tancredi to promote the efficient administration of the Avoidance Actions and/or Mediated Claims. Such reports shall be issued in writing and filed on the docket in the Main Case with notice to any Avoidance Defendants that would be impacted by any recommendations of Judge Tancredi. Upon a hearing considering Judge Tancredi's recommendations and any timely written response but without need for the filing of a motion, the Court may enter further orders addressing such recommendations.\n\nu. The Mediation Procedures shall be subject to modification by further order of the Court, including, without limitation, by a motion filed in the Main Case by the Trustee or any party in interest for good cause shown, or otherwise as the Court deems appropriate, including, without limitation, based upon Judge Tancredi's recommendations.\n\nv. Mediation Proceedings shall terminate upon the earliest of the issuance of a Mediator's Report indicating a complete resolution of the Mediating Parties' Mediated Claims, a written notice of termination by any Mediating Party or Judge Tancredi (a \"Termination Notice\"), or an order of the Court terminating such proceedings. Any Termination Notice shall be served on the following parties (as applicable): (i) the Trustee, (ii) the Counterparty, (iii) the Assigned Mediator, and (iv) Judge Tancredi. If the Termination Notice applies to Mediated Claims that are the subject of an adversary proceeding, the issuing party shall cause the Termination Notice to be filed in the applicable adversary proceeding. A Termination Notice may be issued at any time by any of the foregoing parties and for any reason. For the avoidance of doubt, Judge Tancredi may\n\nissue a Termination Notice immediately upon a Mediation Referral if Judge Tancredi declines to accept the Mediated Claims for Mediation Proceedings.\n\nw. Notwithstanding anything in these Amended Procedures to the contrary, these Mediation Procedures may be modified by the Court upon the request of the Trustee or any other party in interest, or as otherwise ordered by the Court (including, without limitation, upon recommendations issued by Judge Tancredi), upon a motion filed in the Main Case only in accordance with any applicable rules, provided, however, the revised Mediation Procedures, upon approval, shall be filed in all Avoidance Actions.\n\n# **EXHIBIT 1**\n\n**(Amended Procedures Notice)**\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- |            | x      |                              |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------|------------|--------|------------------------------|\n| In re:                                                      |            | :<br>: | Chapter 11                   |\n| 1<br>HO WAN KWOK,<br>et al.,                                |            | :<br>: | Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)      |\n|                                                             | Debtors.   | :<br>: | (Jointly Administered)       |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- |            | :<br>x |                              |\n| LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11                                  |            | :<br>: |                              |\n| TRUSTEE,                                                    |            | :<br>: | Adv. Proceeding No. xx-xxxxx |\n| v.                                                          | Plaintiff, | :<br>: |                              |\n|                                                             |            | :<br>: |                              |\n| [                                                           | ],         | :<br>: |                              |\n|                                                             | Defendant. | :      |                              |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- |            | :<br>x |                              |\n\n### **[FORM OF[ NOTICE OF APPLICABILITY OF AMENDED AVOIDANCE LITIGATION AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES**\n\n**PLEASE TAKE NOTICE** that the *Order Granting Motion for Entry of Order: (I)*\n\n*Supplementing, Amending, and Superseding (A) Order Directing Parties to Mediation, Appointing the Honorable James J. Tancredi as Mediator, and Amending Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings; (B) Order Amending Order Amending*\n\n<span id=\"page-28-0\"></span><sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n*Order Directing Parties to Mediation, Appointing the Honorable James J. Tancredi as Mediator, and Amending Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings to Facilitate Consensual Pre-Litigation and Pre-Appearance Mediation; and (II) Approving Intervention of Appropriate Avoidance Defendants in Omnibus Alter Ego Actions as to Alter Ego Claims Against Specified Alter Ego Defendants* [Main Case ECF No. (\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_)] appended hereto as **Exhibit 1**, including, without limitation, the *Amended Avoidance Litigation and Mediation Procedures* appended thereto, is hereby made applicable to and governs this adversary proceeding.\n\nDated: [\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_], 202\\_ LUC A. DESPINS\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: */s/ FORM*\n\n[Attorney (ct )] NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2884 Email: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ *Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n### **[FORM OF[ Exhibit 1**\n\n**(Order Granting Motion for Entry of Order: (I) Supplementing, Amending, and Superseding (A) Order Directing Parties to Mediation, Appointing the Honorable James J. Tancredi as Mediator, and Amending Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings; and (B) Order Amending Order Amending Order Directing Parties to Mediation, Appointing the Honorable James J. Tancredi as Mediator, and Amending Order Approving Procedures Applicable to Avoidance Claim Adversary Proceedings to Facilitate Consensual Pre-Litigation and Pre-Appearance Mediation; and (II) Approving Intervention of Appropriate Avoidance Defendants in Omnibus Alter Ego Actions as to Alter Ego Claims Against Specified Alter Ego Defendants)**\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 4628 Filed 08/28/25 Entered 08/28/25 16:20:57 Page 32 of 53\n\n# **EXHIBIT 2**\n\n**(Form of Caption)**\n\n| UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT<br>DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT<br>BRIDGEPORT DIVISION<br>----------------------------------------------------------------<br>x |                                                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| In re:                                                                                                                                                    |                                                                                | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |\n| HO WAN KWOK,                                                                                                                                              | 1<br>et al.,                                                                   | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |\n|                                                                                                                                                           | Debtors.                                                                       | :<br>:<br>(Jointly Administered)<br>:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |\n| LUC A. DESPINS, CHAPTER 11<br>TRUSTEE,<br>v.                                                                                                              | ----------------------------------------------------------------<br>Plaintiff, | x<br>:<br>Adv. Proceeding Nos. 24-05005, 24-05006,<br>:<br>24-05008, 24-05009, 24-05010, 24-05011,<br>:<br>24-05012, 24-05013, 24-05014, 24-05015,<br>:<br>24-05016, 24-05017, 24-05018, 24-05019,<br>:<br>24-05020, 24-05021, 24-05022, 24-05023,<br>:                                                                                           |\n| AVOIDANCE DEFENDANTS,                                                                                                                                     |                                                                                | :<br>24-05024, 24-05025, 24-05026, 24-05027,<br>:<br>24-05028, 24-05029, 24-05030, 24-05031,<br>:<br>24-05032, 24-05033, 24-05035, 24-05036,<br>:                                                                                                                                                                                                 |\n|                                                                                                                                                           | Defendants.                                                                    | 24-05037, 24-05038, 24-05039, 24-05040,<br>:<br>24-05041, 24-05042, 24-05043, 24-05044,<br>:<br>24-05045, 24-05046, 24-05047, 24-05048,<br>:<br>:<br>24-05049, 24-05050, 24-05051, 24-05052,<br>:<br>24-05053, 24-05054, 24-05055, 24-05056,<br>:<br>24-05057, 24-05058, 24-05059, 24-05060,<br>:<br>24-05061, 24-05062, 24-05063, 24-05064,      |\n|                                                                                                                                                           |                                                                                | :<br>24-05065, 24-05066, 24-05067, 24-05068,<br>:<br>24-05069, 24-05070, 24-05071, 24-05072,<br>:<br>24-05073, 24-05074, 24-05075, 24-05076,<br>:<br>:<br>24-05077, 24-05078, 24-05079, 24-05080,<br>:<br>24-05081, 24-05082, 24-05084, 24-05085,<br>:<br>24-05086, 24-05087, 24-05088, 24-05089,<br>:<br>24-05090, 24-05091, 24-05092, 24-05093, |\n| (caption<br>continues on next page)                                                                                                                       |                                                                                | :<br>24-05094, 24-05095, 24-05096, 24-05097,<br>:<br>24-05098, 24-05099, 24-05100, 24-05101,<br>:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |\n\n<span id=\"page-32-0\"></span><sup>1</sup> The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases) (last four digits of tax identification number: 9595), Genever Holdings LLC (last four digits of tax identification number: 8202) and Genever Holdings Corporation. The mailing address for the Trustee, Genever Holdings LLC, and the Genever Holdings Corporation is Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166 c/o Luc A. Despins, as Trustee for the Estate of Ho Wan Kwok (solely for purposes of notices and communications).\n\n: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 24-05102, 24-05103, 24-05104, 24-05105, 24-05106, 24-05107, 24-05108, 24-05109, 24-05110, 24-05111, 24-05112, 24-05113, 24-05114, 24-05115, 24-05116, 24-05117, 24-05118, 24-05119, 24-05120, 24-05121, 24-05122, 24-05123, 24-05124, 24-05125, 24-05126, 24-05127, 24-05128, 24-05129, 24-05130, 24-05131, 24-05133, 24-05134, 24-05135, 24-05136, 24-05137, 24-05138, 24-05139, 24-05140, 24-05141, 24-05142, 24-05143, 24-05144, 24-05145, 24-05146, 24-05147, 24-05148, 24-05149, 24-05150, 24-05151, 24-05152, 24-05153, 24-05154, 24-05155, 24-05156, 24-05157, 24-05159, 24-05160, 24-05161, 24-05162, 24-05163, 24-05164, 24-05165, 24-05166, 24-05167, 24-05168, 24-05169, 24-05170, 24-05171, 24-05172, 24-05173, 24-05174, 24-05175, 24-05176, 24-05177, 24-05178, 24-05179, 24-05180, 24-05181, 24-05182, 24-05184, 24-05185, 24-05186, 24-05188, 24-05189, 24-05190, 24-05191, 24-05192, 24-05193, 24-05195, 24-05196, 24-05197, 24-05198, 24-05199, 24-05200, 24-05201, 24-05202, 24-05203, 24-05204, 24-05205, 24-05206, 24-05207, 24-05208, 24-05209, 24-05210, 24-05211, 24-05212, 24-05214, 24-05215, 24-05216, 24-05217, 24-05218, 24-05219, 24-05220, 24-05221, 24-05222, 24-05223, 24-05224, 24-05225, 24-05226, 24-05227, 24-05228, 24-05229, 24-05230, 24-05231, 24-05232, 24-05233, 24-05234, 24-05235, 24-05236, 24-05237, 24-05238, 24-05239, 24-05240, 24-05241, 24-05242, 24-05243, 24-05244, 24-05245, 24-05246, 24-05247, 24-05248, 24-05250, 24-05251, 24-05252, 24-05253, 24-05254, 24-05255, 24-05256, 24-05257, 24-05258, 24-05259, 24-05260, 24-05261, 24-05262, 24-05263, 24-05264, 24-05265, 24-05266, 24-05267, 24-05268,\n\n(caption continues on next page)\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------- : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x 24-05269, 24-05270, 24-05272, 24-05274, 24-05275, 24-05276, 24-05279, 24-05280, 24-05282, 24-05286, 24-05287, 24-05288, 24-05289, 24-05290, 24-05291, 24-05292, 24-05293, 24-05294, 24-05295, 24-05296, 24-05297, 24-05298, 24-05299, 24-05300, 24-05301, 24-05302, 24-05303, 24-05304, 24-05305, 24-05306, 24-05307, 24-05308, 24-05309, 24-05310, 24-05313, 24-05315, 24-05316, 24-05317, 25-05003, 25-05004, 25-05005, 25-05006, 25-05007, 25-05008, 25-05009, 25-05010, 25-05011, 25-05012, 25-05013, 25-05014, 25-05015, 25-05016, 25-05017, 25-05018, 25-05019, 25-05020, 25-05021, 25-05022, 25-05023, 25-05024, 25-05025, 25-05026, 25-05027, 25-05028, 25-05029, 25-05030, 25-05031, 25-05032, 25-05033, 25-05034, 25-05035, 25-05036, 25-05037, 25-05038, 25-05039, 25-05040, 25-05041, 25-05042, 25-05043, 25-05044, 25-05045, 25-05046, 25-05047, 25-05048, 25-05049, 25-05050, 25-05051, 25-05052, 25-05057, 25-05058, 25-05059, 25-05061, 25-05067, 25-05068, 25-05069, 25-05070, 25-05071, 25-05072, 25-05073, 25-05074, 25-05075, 25-05076, 25-05077, 25-05078, 25-05079, 25-05080, 25-05081, 25-05082, 25-05083, 25-05084, 25-05085, 25-05086, 25-05087, 25-05088, 25-05089, 25-05090, 25-05091, 25-05092, 25-05093, 25-05094, 25-05095, 25-05096, 25-05097, 25-05098, 25-05099, 25-05100, 25-05101, 25-05102, 25-05103, 25-05104, 25-05105\n\n## **EXHIBIT 3-A**\n\n**(Fully Stayed Avoidance Claims)**\n\n| ADV. PROC. NO.          | DEFENDANT                                       |\n|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05008 | Boardwalk Motor Imports LLC                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05009 | Mercantile Bank International Corp.             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05012 | Ogier                                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05014 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05017 | Post Oak Motors, LLC                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05022 | FAM United LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05023 | Studio Cataldi Group SRL                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05026 | Yieldesta LP                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05029 | Great Bowery Inc dba Camilla Lowther Management |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05032 | Hugga LLC                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05037 | Triple2 Digital LLC                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05038 | D4Zero S.R.L.                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05041 | CFG Global Limited                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05043 | Loro Piana S.P.A.                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05045 | The Quinlan Law Firm, LLC                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05046 | Janco SRL                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05050 | Oro Mont Alpi SRL                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05051 | Mindy Wechsler                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05052 | MF19 Inc                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05068 | Caribe Condado, LLC                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05080 | Reinhard Plank S.R.L.                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05084 | Tavares Cutting Inc                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05087 | Mosaicon Shoes SRL                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05088 | Tokyoseiki Co. LTD                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05089 | Pellettieri Di Parma SRL                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05091 | Shalom B LLC dba Asher Fabric Concepts          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05094 | Solazzo Calzature S.R.L.                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05095 | SOD Stone Offroad Design GmbH                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05096 | 1245 Factory Place, LLC                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05097 | Liapull S.R.L.                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05099 | American Arbitration Association, Inc.          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05104 | Ice24 SRO                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05106 | Reach Manufacturing, LLC                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05111 | DNM Beauty Distribution                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05113 | 1322089 B.C. L.T.D.                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05116 | Hilton Management, LLC                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05118 | J Tan Jewelry Design, Inc.                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05121 | Shaylen Music LLC                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05123 | Bestview1 Pty Ltd                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05124 | Legends OWO LLC                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05127 | Waycap S.P.A.                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05129 | Fay Ye                                          |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05131 | Lawrence River                                     |\n|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05136 | ASAP SRL                                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05137 | Bellerive Attorneys at Law                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05139 | Houston Litstar LLC                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05140 | Quinones Law PLLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05142 | Immobiliara Barbara 2000 SRL                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05143 | Dream Projects LLC                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05146 | Fortnum Information Security Limited               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05148 | Galaxy Ltd                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05150 | Jialin Qin                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05151 | Li Sho Yo                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05153 | Ming Ni                                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05155 | Hayashi Meiou                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05156 | 12476517 Canada Society                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05157 | DP Textile & Apparel Inc                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05160 | LA International Foundation                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05164 | National Sweepstakes Company, LLC                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05165 | Oxford Visionary Ltd.                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05166 | Chris Lee                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05169 | D&D Solutions LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05170 | The Gertz File Investigative Reporting Project Inc |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05173 | Wenhua Gong                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05176 | Luminescence Co Ltd                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05177 | Xiaobo He                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05180 | Richmond Strategic Advisor                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05191 | Deng Qian                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05193 | Fiesta Investments Ltd                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05195 | Shujuan Milne                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05197 | Great Lakes Drone Company                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05198 | G-Service LLC                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05205 | Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05207 | Bering Yachts LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05210 | Jiayao Gan                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05215 | Bradley Staple, dba Staples Building Solutions     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05217 | Haisong Peng                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05218 | Hou Yuan Chan                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05224 | OSC Orbit Services Company LLC                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05227 | Tao Zheng                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05230 | Cayuse Government Services                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05231 | 9 East 40th Street                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05232 | Daihao Zhou                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05234 | Lyzon Enterprises Corporation                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05235 | Halley Chen CPA Professional Corporation           |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05236 | Feng Yi                              |\n|-------------------------|--------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05237 | Qiang Hu                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05239 | Jianhai Jiao                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05240 | Fengjie Ma                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05241 | MZC Financial Inc                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05242 | Cotton Craft Textiles Intl Trading   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05243 | Ihotry Ltd                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05244 | Quick-Equip LLC                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05245 | RM Auctions Deutschland GmbH         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05245 | Qiang Guo                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05246 | WA & HF LLC                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Curiosity Corp.                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Flying Colours Corp                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | River Valley Operations LLC          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Supreme SG PTE LTD                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Top California Beach Corporation     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Wang's Realty Management Service Inc |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05250 | Scarabaeus Wealth Management AG      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05251 | LLC Stz Fund No. 1                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05252 | Gettr USA Inc                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05253 | Ivy Capital Advisor Limited          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05254 | NAV Consulting Inc                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05255 | Ziba Limited                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05256 | New Mulberry PTE Ltd                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05257 | Mishcon de Reya LLP                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05258 | Hogan Lovells International LLP      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05259 | Top Target General Trading LLC       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05260 | GCP Investment Advisors SL           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05261 | Starling Bank Ltd.                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05262 | Red Team Partners                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | G Club Holdco I LLC                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | G Club Three                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | HAA Group Pty Ltd                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | Mountains of Spices Inc              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | Omicron Nutraceutical LLC            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | Rosy Acme Ventures Limited           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05264 | Smaragdos Mamzeris                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05265 | Siu Ming Je                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05266 | Gong Jianfen                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05267 | Khaled Ashafy                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05268 | Pure Global Group Limited            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd           |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC                  |\n|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya New World Inc                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya New York Rock Inc                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya UK Club                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Himalaya Worldwide SL                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05269 | UK Himalaya Ltd                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05270 | Crocker Mansion Estate LLC and Taurus Fund     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Weihua Li                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Rongrong Li                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Zhang Lin                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Mi Kyung Yang                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Xue Wang                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Yaping Zhang                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Zhixuan Li                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Fanggui Zhu                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Yuechen Lan                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Tian Shu Huang                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Shiying Li                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Jianxiao Chen                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05272 | Hayman Hong Kong Opportunities Onshore Fund LP |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05274 | Kin Ming Je                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05274 | Sin Ting Rong                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Lamp Capital LLC                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Golden Spring (New York) Ltd                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Greenwich Land LLC                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | HCHK Technologies Inc                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | HCHK Property Management Inc                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Lexington Property and Staffing Inc            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Leading Shine NY Ltd                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | G Club International Limited                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | G Club Operations LLC                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | G Fashion                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | G Fashion Media Group Inc                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Rule of Law Foundation III Inc                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Rule of Law Society IV Inc.                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | GFNY Inc                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Anton Development Limited                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Himalaya International Clearing Ltd            |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd               |\n|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | GF Italy LLC                                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | ACA Capital Group Ltd                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Hamilton Investment Management Ltd                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Himalaya International Reserves Ltd                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Hudson Diamond NY LLC                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | Saraca Media Group Inc                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05275 | G Fashion International Limited                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05276 | ZYB Associates, LLC d/b/a Law Offices of Yongbing Zhang |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05276 | Yongbing Zhang                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05286 | Clear Treasury Limited                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05287 | Ascentiq Solutions Limited                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05288 | 5ivetech Limited                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05289 | Aviva                                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05290 | Birchstone Capital AG                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05291 | Callsign Ltd                                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05292 | Epic IT Ltd                                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05293 | Goodman Masson Ltd                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05294 | Hays Specialist Recruitment Limited                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05295 | G Club Two                                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05296 | Offensive Shield Ltd                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05297 | Kionasoft LLC                                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05298 | HP Inc UK Limited                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05299 | Zendesk Inc                                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05300 | IW Group Services UK Ltd                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05301 | Qun Ju                                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05302 | Whole Alpha Trading LLC (f/k/a Art Operation LLC)       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05303 | CyberApt Recruitment Ltd                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05304 | Teneo Ltd UK                                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05305 | Telehouse International Corporation                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05306 | I.com Solutions Limited                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05307 | Softcat PLC                                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05308 | The Golden Sealine Limited                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05309 | Haitong International Securities                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05310 | Qiu Yue Shou                                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05316 | Foley Hoag LLP                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05317 | Norris McLaughlin PA                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05006 | CRISP Insurance Advisors                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05007 | Hatstone Lawyers (BVI) Ltd                              |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05008 | CyGlass Inc                                      |\n|-------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05009 | Strategic Political Management LLC               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05010 | David Consulting Inc                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05011 | Melbourne ROLF Incorporated                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05012 | Bambee Inc                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05014 | JS Morlu LLC                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05015 | Cesare Attolini NY LLC                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05016 | Global Shuttle Pte Ltd                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05017 | Hee-Seup Shin                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05020 | Abu Dhabi Motors LLC                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05021 | Savino Del Bene USA Inc                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05023 | Mandelli USA Inc                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05024 | Prodome Management Consulting LLC                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05025 | Taiwan Baudau Farm International Limited Company |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05026 | CSQ<br>Project Development Consultants           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05027 | Cyjax Limited                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05028 | KDEBECHE Inc                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05029 | Chan Chih Hsing                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05030 | O'Rourke (Midlands) Ltd                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05031 | Chetu Inc                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05032 | VP Bank (BVI) Ltd                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05034 | Wenlong Wang                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05035 | Xiang Zeng                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05036 | 17 State Owner LLC                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05037 | BitGo Trust Company Inc                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05038 | S.A. Leather                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05040 | SDL Auctions Ltd                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05042 | Passione Rossa LLC                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05044 | BMW of Freeport                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05046 | Vision Building Energy Efficiency LLC d/b/a Bee  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05047 | FV Bank International Inc                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05067 | X49 FZ LLC                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05068 | Yay Design Inc                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05069 | Ping Tang                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05070 | A.C.N. 676 287 157 PTY Ltd                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05071 | Lee Thian Guan John                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05072 | Dante Emanuel Leslie Delroy Brown                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05073 | Azeem Bashir                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05074 | Azalea M Garcia Corujo Esq (AGC Consulting)      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05076 | Yuekun Ji                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05077 | Andrew David Law                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05078 | Richard E Signorelli Attorney at Law             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05081 | Syed Ehsan Haque                                 |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05082 | Ali Albakri                                    |\n|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05087 | Cedric DuPont Antiques                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05088 | 1stDibs.com                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05089 | Warp & Weft                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05090 | Westland Antiques Limited                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05091 | Artistic Tile Inc                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05092 | Gold Medal Service LLC                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05093 | Lobel Modern Inc                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05094 | NY Blinds and Shades Inc dba Innovation Shades |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05095 | Labarbiera Custom Homes LLC                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05096 | MonStar Air Heating & Cooling LLC              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05097 | Picture Perfect Glass & Mirror LLC             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05098 | Prevenitas Inc                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05099 | Marmiro Stones Inc                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Chenyang Wang                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Danni Yu                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Foteini Kantziou                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Haitao Guan                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Jian Jiao                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Kai Zhao                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Le Qiao                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Lee Shin Jiet                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Naseer Ahmad Khan                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Niels Bom Olesen                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Xianggang Li                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Xiaona Chen                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Xu Zhang                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Ying Hu                                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Yuxiang Diao                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Zelin Li                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05100 | Zhuowei Xu                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05101 | Armanino LLP                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05102 | Rizwan Javed                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05104 | Astound Broadband                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05105 | Ace Decade Holdings Limited                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05105 | Bravo Luck Limited                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05105 | Eastern Profit Corporation Limited             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05105 | Guang Hong Limited                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05105 | H Reserve Management Ltd                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05105 | New Dynamic Development Limited                |\n\n### **EXHIBIT 3-B**\n\n**(Partially Stayed Avoidance Claims)**\n\n| ADV. PROC. NO.          | DEFENDANT                                           |\n|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05006 | Amazon Web Services                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05007 | Blueberry Builders                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05011 | E.L.J.M. Consulting LLC                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05016 | Imperius International Trad Co Ltd                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05019 | Mary Fashion SPA                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05021 | Bannon Strategic Advisors Inc                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05024 | TT Resources 1 Pty Ltd                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05028 | Yuqiang Qin                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05028 | Yunfu Jiang                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05036 | Mei Guo                                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05044 | Teris-Phoenix, LLC                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05054 | Style Eyes Inc. d/b/a Ginger Finds                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05056 | FFP (BVI) Limited                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Amazon Inc                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Hing Chi Ngok                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Alex Hadjicharalambous                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Bernardo Enriquez                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Chunguang Han                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05057 | Mei Guo                                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05058 | Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05059 | Federal Express                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05060 | Apple Inc                                           |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05060 | Alex Hadjicharalambous                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05060 | Bernardo Enriquez                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05060 | Chunguang Han                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05060 | Mei Guo                                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05065 | A.Z. Bigiotterie<br>S.A.S. DI Zanutto Gabriele & C. |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05069 | B&H Foto & Electronics Corp                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05069 | Hing Chi Ngok                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05069 | Alex Hadjicharalambous                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05069 | Bernardo Enriquez                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05069 | Chunguang Han                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05075 | Marcella Monica Falciani                            |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05077 | American Express                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05082 | Ohtzar Shlomo Solomon Treasure LLC                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05085 | Vandenloom LLC                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05090 | Swans Team Design Inc                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05093 | 2 B Packing LLC                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05098 | Shing Seung Ankerite Engineering Ltd.               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05102 | Ocorian Consulting Ltd                              |\n\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05105 | N87 Inc                                           |\n|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05109 | Moran Yacht Management, Inc                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05112 | Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05115 | Cloudflare, Inc.                                  |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05122 | Indium Software Inc                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05125 | Rilievi Group S.R.L.                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05133 | Beile Li                                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05134 | V.X. Cerda & Associates PA                        |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05135 | Liberty Jet Management Corp.                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05141 | Flat Rate Movers Ltd                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05145 | Manhattan Motorcars, Inc                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05154 | Kamel Debeche                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05159 | Gold Leaf Consulting Limited                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05161 | Mandelli USA, Inc.                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05168 | The Francis Firm PLLC                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05172 | Federal Corporation (Japan)                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05174 | SGB Packaging                                     |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05175 | Lau Lai Chun Annie.                               |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05186 | Berkeley Rowe Ltd.                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05188 | Weddle Law PLLC                                   |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05189 | TD Avenue (The Diamond Avenue)                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05192 | Forbes Hare                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05199 | Lawall & Mitchell LLC                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05199 | Aaron Mitchell                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05203 | Oasis Tech Limited                                |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05206 | Hao Haidong                                       |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05211 | Putnam's Landscaping LLC                          |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05223 | G-Translators Pty Ltd                             |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05226 | ACASS Canada Ltd.                                 |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05238 | Qiang Guo                                         |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05248 | Tut Co Limited                                    |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | BSA Strategic Fund I                              |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05263 | Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 24-05271 | Junjie Jiang                                      |\n| Adv. Proc. No. 25-05052 | N.A.R. Enterprises Inc dbs Luxury Cleaning NY     |\n\n## **EXHIBIT 4**\n\n**(Discovery Procedures in Avoidance Actions)**\n\n### **DISCOVERY PROCEDURES IN AVOIDANCE ACTIONS**\n\n1. These Discovery Procedures shall apply to all Avoidance Actions unless otherwise ordered by the Court.\n\n2. No later than sixty (60) days following the Court's approval of these Discovery Procedures, the Trustee shall create an electronic discovery depository (the \"Depository\") comprised of data rooms (the \"Data Rooms\") each containing all non-privileged[1](#page-47-0) documents[2](#page-47-1) in the possession of the Trustee related to the following subject matter:\n\n- a. Golden Spring (New York) Limited[3](#page-47-2) ;\n- b. Lamp Capital LLC;\n- c. Leading Shine NY Ltd.;\n- d. Hudson Diamond NY LLC;\n- e. Lexington Property and Staffing, Inc.;\n- f. HCHK Technologies, Inc.;\n- g. HCHK Property Management, Inc.;\n- h. Greenwich Land LLC;\n- i. New Dynamic Development Limited;\n- j. Taurus Fund LLC; and\n\nk. The Trustee's allegations in Avoidance Complaints asserting claims for actual fraudulent transfer under section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code and/or N.Y. Debtor & Creditor Law regarding the Debtor's \"shell game\" of using alter egos and nominees to hold title to his assets and conduct his affairs. *See, e.g., Avoidance Complaint* in *Despins v. Agora Lab, Inc.* [Adv. Proc. No. 24-05005 Docket No. 1] ¶¶ 15-27, 32-34.\n\nl. The Avoidance Defendants, *provided, however*, the Trustee need not include documents related to Avoidance Defendants (i) as to which the Trustee has solely asserted Stayed Avoidance Claims, (ii) that are engaging in Mediation Proceedings as of the date\n\n<span id=\"page-47-0\"></span><sup>1</sup> \"Non-privileged\" as used in paragraph 2 above shall mean not subject to any attorney-client privilege, work product, or similar privilege or protection, that is owned or controlled by the Trustee, including, without limitation, in respect to the Trustee's own attorney-client relationships and creation of work product by the Trustee and/or his professionals and/or pursuant to the *Consent Order Regarding Control of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection Related to Rule 2004 Subpoenaed Documents and Information* [Main Case ECF No. 856] (as may be further modified, the \"Privileges Order\") and/or the Bankruptcy Code (including, without limitation, as successor to the Debtor).\n\n<span id=\"page-47-1\"></span><sup>2</sup> Documents shall be uploaded to the data room in the form produced to the Trustee, including any available metadata. If not apparent from such metadata, the Trustee will cooperate to respond to any inquiries by Avoidance Defendants as to the source of documents in the Data Rooms. Further, at the request of any Avoidance Defendant undertaking discovery, the Trustee will supply copies of subpoenas and document requests issued to producing parties with respect to documents in the Data Rooms.\n\n<span id=\"page-47-2\"></span><sup>3</sup> For the avoidance of doubt, in producing all documents related to the entities set forth in subparagraphs (a) through (j), the Trustee shall include, among other things, all documents related to any prepetition or postpetition transfers made via such entities.\n\nwhich is sixty (60) days following the Court's approval of these Discovery Procedures, or (iii) as to which the Trustee's claims have been resolved by settlement or dismissal.\n\n3. With respect to documents as to which the Trustee asserts privilege, work product, or any similar privilege or protection, the Trustee shall produce a categorical privilege log generally identifying by producing parties and/or categories of documents those documents covered by the above subject matter that have been withheld from the Data Rooms, *provided, however*, the Trustee need not include on such log the work product of, or communications between and among, the Trustee, his counsel, and his other advisors.\n\n4. Access to the Depository shall be limited to attorneys appearing for Avoidance Defendants that (a) have individually certified compliance with these Discovery Procedures[4](#page-48-0) , and (b) whose law firms and applicable clients have executed P.O. Consents.[5](#page-48-1) In accessing any Data Room(s), the accessing attorney shall certify compliance with these requirements and shall list the Avoidance Defendant(s) for which the accessing attorney is accessing the Data Room(s). Avoidance Defendants accessing documents and information in the Data Rooms shall be deemed to understand that the Trustee's creation of and delivery of documents into the Depository is subject to the following reservation of rights:\n\n- a. The vast majority of the documents and information in the Depository was compiled by the Trustee from third parties in the course of his investigation and the Trustee makes absolutely no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, and/or authenticity of documents or information therein.\n- b. The inclusion of documents or information in the Depository shall not constitute an admission or basis to argue that such documents or information are relevant or admissible, nor that the documents are genuine, nor shall the inclusions of documents or information in the Depository constitute an admission of any facts.\n- c. The inclusion of documents or information in the Depository shall not constitute nor evidence any waiver of attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other privilege or protection exercisable by the Trustee, whether in his own right or as successor-in-interest.\n- d. The Trustee and any Avoidance Defendants participating in discovery reserve all rights and objections with respect to documents and information contained in the Depository.\n- e. The Protective Order applies to all documents and information contained in the Depository to the extent that such documents and information are designated \"Confidential\" or \"Highly Confidential\" and access to the Depository shall be\n\n<span id=\"page-48-0\"></span><sup>4</sup> This certification shall be provided in a form reasonably acceptable to the Trustee.\n\n<span id=\"page-48-1\"></span><sup>5</sup> To obtain access to the Depository, the P.O. Consents must consent to both the Protective Order and the P.O Addendum. \"Applicable clients\" as used in paragraph 3 above shall mean the Avoidance Defendant for which the attorney access the Data Room(s) is appearing and for which Avoidance Defendant the attorney is accessing the Data Room(s).\n\nstrictly limited to counsel for Avoidance Defendants that have (individually or through their law firms) agreed to be bound by the Protective Order.\n\nf. Counsel that obtain documents or information through Discovery Proceedings in any Avoidance Action may only share such documents and information with the client(s) as to which such Discovery Proceedings are conducted. For the avoidance of doubt, counsel that obtain documents or information through Discovery Proceedings as to one client may not share such documents or information with any other individuals or entities (including counsel's other client(s), unless such other clients are independently entitled to access the documents or information in accordance with these Discovery Procedures).\n\n5. The following discovery schedule (the \"Discovery Schedule\") shall apply in Avoidance Actions, with deadlines running from the date that discovery is commenced (the \"Discovery Start Date\"):\n\na. No later than seven days after the Discovery Start Date, the Trustee shall grant the Avoidance Defendant's counsel, provided such counsel is otherwise eligible to access the Depository, access to the Data Rooms containing documents related to the claims asserted in the applicable Avoidance Action. If the Trustee and the Avoidance Defendant disagree about which Data Rooms should be accessible to an Avoidance Defendant's counsel, the parties shall meet and confer to seek to resolve such disagreement, following which the disagreement may be submitted to the Court by a motion filed in the relevant Avoidance Action.\n\nb. No later than fourteen (14) days after the Discovery Start Date, the parties shall exchange initial disclosures pursuant to Civil Rule 26(a)(1) (\"Automatic Disclosures\"), *provided, however*, any obligation of the Trustee to produce documents as part of the Trustee's Automatic Disclosures shall be satisfied by the Trustee's granting of access to the Avoidance Defendant to any relevant Data Rooms.\n\nc. Any initial interrogatories, requests for admission, and/or requests for production of documents (collectively, the \"Written Discovery Requests\"), pursuant to Civil Rules 33, 34, and 36, made applicable to the Avoidance Actions by Bankruptcy Rules 7033, 7034, and 7036, as well as initial subpoenas to third-parties, shall be served no later than ninety (90) days after the Discovery Start Date. The parties may serve supplemental Written Discovery Requests and subpoenas, consistent with the other dates and deadlines set forth herein, based on newly discovered information or developments in the litigation.\n\nd. The deadline for the completion of all fact discovery, including deposition discovery, discovery conducted through the Depository, discovery conducted pursuant to Written Discovery Requests, under, *e.g.*, Bankruptcy Rules 7030, 7033, 7034, and 7036, and Civil Rules 30, 33, 34, and 36, and/or third-party discovery pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 9016 and Civil Rule 45, shall be three hundred (300) days after the Discovery Start Date.\n\ne. Any party that believes expert discovery is required shall provide written notice to all other parties no later than sixty (60) days prior to the close of discovery. Upon receipt of such notice, the parties shall confer regarding a schedule for expert discovery including, without limitation, disclosure and deposition deadlines, which schedule the parties shall submit to the Court for approval. In the absence of agreement as to the schedule governing expert discovery, the parties shall request a status conference to address the matter.\n\nf. The deadlines above may be extended (a) up to ninety (90) days by a written stipulation between the parties filed in the applicable Avoidance Action; and/or (b) upon a motion by any party by order of the Court.\n\n6. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any Avoidance Defendants wishing to serve Written Discovery Requests on the Trustee shall, prior to service: (i) make diligent efforts to obtain any documents and information sought from the Depository; (ii) exclude from Written Discovery Requests any requests for documents and information available through the Depository; (iii) meet and confer with the Trustee regarding the availability of documents and information in the Depository and the contemplated Written Discovery Requests and to discuss other Avoidance Defendants that may be undertaking discovery with respect to the same or similar subject matter; and (iv) make reasonable efforts to coordinate with other Avoidance Defendants[6](#page-50-0) to avoid duplicative or cumulative discovery and to serve joint requests where reasonably possible, including, by way of example, by service of common interrogatories. The Trustee reserves all rights to object to such Written Discovery Requests, including without limitation on the grounds that the requests, in the aggregate, are duplicative and/or overly burdensome on the Trustee. Any disputes as to the foregoing shall be resolved by the Court upon appropriate motion.\n\n7. Discovery shall be available in any Avoidance Action (\"Discovery-Eligible Actions\") except for those in which: (a) the Trustee's claims are Stayed Avoidance Claims under subparagraph (e)(i) of the Amended Procedures; and/or (b) any Defendant is participating in Mediation Proceedings with the Trustee regarding the claims in such action. Any party to a Discovery-Eligible Action may file a Notice of Discovery Start Date in such action, which filing shall fix the Discovery Start Date as the later of: (x) the first business day at least seventy (70) days after entry of the Court's order approving these Discovery Procedures; or (b) the date of the filing of the Notice of Discovery Start Date.\n\n8. For the avoidance of doubt, documents and information that are in the possession of a party solely under circumstances that render such documents and information subject to mediation privilege and confidentiality shall not be discoverable.\n\n9. The inclusion of documents and information in the Depository shall not constitute nor be evidence of a waiver of attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other\n\n<span id=\"page-50-0\"></span><sup>6</sup> For the avoidance of doubt, the obligation to coordinate with other Avoidance Defendants shall apply only when other Avoidance Defendants are known to the Avoidance Defendant subject to the obligation, including, without limitation, following the Trustee advising that other Avoidance Defendants are seeking the same or similar discovery.\n\nprivilege or protection exercisable by the Trustee, whether in his own right or as a successor-ininterest. Nor shall the inclusion of documents and information in the Depository constitute or be evidence of a waiver of the work product doctrine with respect to the Trustee's investigation of the Debtor's financial affairs, which protection the Trustee has expressly reserved.\n\n10. Prior to undertaking deposition discovery, any Avoidance Defendant shall meet and confer with the Trustee as to the deponents, subject matter, and scheduling of any depositions, with an eye toward efficiency, including, among other things, limiting any duplication and other burdens of deposition discovery. During such conferences, the Trustee may propose and Avoidance Defendants shall consider when reasonable omnibus deposition proceedings including Avoidance Defendants from multiple Avoidance Actions. No parties shall notice depositions to occur in any Avoidance Action earlier than 75 days following the Discovery Start Date. Upon noticing any deposition, the noticing party must provide at least twenty-one (21) days advance written notice (an \"Avoidance Deposition Notice\") to the Trustee and to all Avoidance Defendants by email to the Trustee's and Avoidance Defendants' appearing counsel, or, as to Avoidance Defendants for which counsel has not appeared, by U.S. Mail. Where multiple parties wish to depose the same deponent, the Trustee and all Avoidance Defendants shall cooperate in scheduling to avoid duplicative depositions. Upon the request of any Avoidance Defendant wishing to issue an Avoidance Deposition Notice, the Trustee shall furnish a list of Avoidance Defendants and their appearing counsel (including email addresses where available) or mailing address. With respect to any deponent that has previously been deposed in an Avoidance Action, no further deposition may be noticed by any Avoidance Defendant that received an Avoidance Deposition Notice as to such deponent while the Avoidance Defendant was participating in discovery and the deposition occurred at least 75 days following such defendant's Discovery Start Date, except upon the Trustee's advance written consent or order of the Court. Where multiple Avoidance Defendants are participating in depositions, (i) they shall make reasonable efforts to avoid duplicative inquiry; and (ii) where necessary, the parties shall confer regarding reasonable adjustments to the time allocated for deposition discovery pursuant to Civil Rule 30(d)(1).\n\n11. For the avoidance of doubt, the Protective Order and the P.O. Addendum shall apply in any deposition proceedings.\n\n12. For the avoidance of doubt, in light of the anticipated inclusion in the Depository of documents designated Highly Confidential, direct access to the Depository shall be limited to parties' counsel that are eligible for such access. The foregoing shall not prevent such counsel from sharing documents and information obtained through Discovery Proceedings with their applicable client if otherwise permissible under the Protective Order and the P.O. Addendum.\n\n13. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, as to Partially Stayed Avoidance Claims, discovery shall not proceed with respect to any Stayed Issues pending further order of the Court.\n\n14. In light of these Discovery Procedures, the parties shall not be required to hold a discovery planning conference pursuant to Civil Rule 26(f), *provided, however,* the parties shall confer and cooperate in good faith as may be necessary to undertake discovery pursuant to these\n\nDiscovery Procedures, including, without limitation, the subject matter set forth in Civil Rule 26(f)(3).\n\n15. For the avoidance of doubt, D. Conn. Local R. Civ. P. 37 shall apply to any disputes arising in discovery proceedings in Avoidance Actions.","body_zh":"美国康涅狄格州联邦破产法院布里奇波特分庭\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　:\n:\n第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等，　:\nCase No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。1　:\n:\n合并管理\n:\n---------------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n第11章受托人请求作出命令的动议：(I) 补充、修订并取代 (A) 要求各方进行调解、指定尊敬的 JAMES J. TANCREDI 法官为调解人，并修订批准适用于撤销权请求对立程序之程序的命令；以及 (B) 为促进自愿的诉前及出庭前调解而修订要求各方进行调解、指定尊敬的 JAMES J. TANCREDI 法官为调解人，并修订批准适用于撤销权请求对立程序之程序的命令的命令；以及 (II) 批准适当的撤销权诉讼被告就针对特定另我被告的另我主张介入综合另我诉讼\n\nLuc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（“债务人”）的第11章受托人（“受托人”），特此恭敬地请求（“本动议”）作出一项命令，其形式载于作为附件1附于本动议的拟议命令（“拟议命令”），以：(i) 补充、修订并取代 (a) 本院的《要求各方进行调解、指定尊敬的 James J. Tancredi 法官为调解人，并修订批准适用于撤销权请求对立程序之程序的命令》[ECF No. 3163]（“诉讼程序命令”）；及 (b) 本院修订诉讼程序命令以批准适用于自愿诉前及出庭前调解之程序的命令\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（亦称 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（Genever Holdings有限责任公司）（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever Holdings公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP，200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，转交 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 遗产的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\n[ECF No. 3465]（“诉前程序命令”，并与诉讼程序命令合称“程序命令”）；及 (ii) 批准相关撤销权诉讼被告介入综合另我诉讼。[2] 为支持本动议，受托人陈述如下：\n\n初步陈述\n\n1. 本动议请求批准经修订的撤销权诉讼程序，包括所附的证据开示程序（统称“经修订程序”），以规管有关受托人撤销权请求的诉讼、调解及证据开示。\n\n2. 经修订程序将简化调解程序，使该程序具有自愿性，从而适当地仅适用于积极寻求和解谈判并因此最有可能受益于调解人努力的当事人。\n\n3. 经修订程序还采纳了旨在提供适合本第11章案件特殊情形的高效证据开示程序的证据开示程序。在适当情况下，该等程序规定协调证据开示程序（尤其是证言录取），以尽量减少重复程序。\n\n4. 最后，受托人通过本动议请求本院：(a) 批准相关撤销权诉讼被告介入综合另我诉讼，作为该等被告通过于下列较晚日期或之前在适当的另我诉讼中提交介入通知，对受托人关于某些实体（即特定另我被告）为债务人的另我及/或该等实体或其财产在衡平法上或实益上由债务人拥有的主张（统称“另我主张”）提出异议的唯一机制：(a) 自拟议命令作出之日起三十 (30) 日；或 (b) 对于在提交本动议后提起的任何撤销权诉讼，自送达传票和对立起诉状之日起六十\n\n2 本动议中未定义的所有首字母大写术语，应视情况采用程序命令和拟议命令中所定义的术语。\n\n(60) 日；并命令所有撤销权诉讼被告（无论其是否已提交介入通知）均应受本院就特定另我被告在综合另我诉讼中作出的判决书约束。[3]\n\n5. 如无该等命令，受托人预计撤销权诉讼被告将寻求在数百宗待决撤销权诉讼中，对受托人针对特定另我被告的另我主张重新进行数十次（甚至更多次）诉讼。不言而喻，这将极其低效，并导致司法资源及遗产资源的浪费。\n\n背景\n\n6. 于 February 15, 2022（“申请日”），债务人向本院提交了根据《破产法》第11章寻求救济的自愿申请。\n\n7. 于 March 21, 2022，美国受托人在本第11章案件中指定了一个无担保债权人正式委员会（“委员会”）。本第11章案件中尚未指定审查员。\n\n8. 于 June 15, 2022，本院作出了一份决定备忘录及命令 [ECF No. 465]（“受托人命令”），指示美国受托人在本第11章案件中指定一名第11章受托人。根据受托人命令，美国受托人选定 Luc A. Despins 担任受托人。\n\n9. 自获指定以来，受托人已调查债务人的财务事务，其中包括与申请前债务人财产权益转让以及未经本院或《破产法》授权的债务人第11章遗产财产申请后转让有关的请求（统称“撤销权请求”），以及其他遗产请求。\n\n3 通过请求该等救济，受托人并未放弃，而是明确维持其立场，即本院现有的所有关于某些实体为债务人的另我及/或在衡平法上或实益上由债务人拥有的裁定，均对撤销权诉讼被告有效并具有约束力。\n\n10. 于 January 29, 2024，本院作出《批准适用于撤销权请求对立程序之程序的命令》[ECF No. 2578]（“原程序命令”），确立规管撤销权诉讼进行的若干程序。\n\n11. 于 February 9 至 15, 2024 期间，受托人提起了首批约270宗撤销权诉讼，即旨在撤销并追回某些申请前及申请后转让的对立程序。\n\n12. 于 May 2, 2024，本院作出诉讼程序命令，修订并补充原程序命令，其中包括采纳调解程序。目前，约五十 (50) 名撤销权诉讼被告正在 Tancredi 法官监督下与受托人进行调解程序。\n\n13. 除提起撤销权诉讼外，受托人还与众多当事方约定中止受托人针对其提起对立程序的时效期限。受托人目前正在与该等当事方及受托人认为可能受制于遗产请求的其他当事方，以及与尚未在受托人提起的撤销权诉讼中出庭的撤销权诉讼被告的律师进行谈判或以其他方式沟通（统称“相对方”）。\n\n14. 为协助解决遗产请求，受托人请求并获本院批准诉前程序。诉前程序规定了一项程序，据此，受托人可在对相对方提起诉讼之前，或与受托人已起诉但其律师尚未在本院出庭的撤销权诉讼被告，进行调解程序。\n\n15. 自受托人于 February 2024 首次提交诉讼以来，受托人持续提起撤销权诉讼。截至目前，受托人已对近500名撤销权诉讼被告提起约400宗撤销权诉讼。\n\n拟议救济\n\n16. 受托人提议本院作出拟议命令，在下列实质方面修订并取代程序命令：\n\n17. 第一，拟议命令规定一套单一、简化的调解程序，适用于已出庭的撤销权诉讼被告（如诉讼程序命令所规定）以及未出庭[4]的撤销权诉讼被告和受托人尚未起诉的相对方（如诉前程序命令所规定）。该等简化程序还将调解程序的后勤安排和程序事项交由调解人酌情决定，并允许任何一方（即受托人或适用的撤销权诉讼被告或相对方）或调解人随时通过提交终止通知终止调解程序。[5] 暂停的撤销权请求和部分暂停的撤销权请求清单（即经修订程序附件3-A和3-B中列明的请求）亦已修订；主要是为了反映自 April 2024 以来提起的额外撤销权诉讼，以及在某些待决诉讼中提交的经修订起诉状。\n\n4 本语境中的“未出庭”是指其律师已联系受托人并表示有意寻求和解，但尚未在相关撤销权诉讼中提交出庭通知的撤销权诉讼被告。为明确起见，如撤销权诉讼被告既未出庭亦未寻求与受托人协商解决，受托人已并将继续通过缺席方式寻求救济。\n\n5 具体而言，经修订程序赋予调解人酌情决定权，以决定：(i) 任何会议的时长和安排；(ii) 陈述的顺序和形式；(iii) 会议地点以及会议是否以现场或视频会议方式举行；(iv) 是否要求调解当事方提交书面材料；以及 (v) 哪些人将出席调解会议。见经修订程序 ¶ p。\n\n18. 第二，拟议命令规定批准证据开示程序，据此受托人拟与撤销权诉讼被告进行证据开示。该等证据开示程序包括：\n\na. 规定受托人建立一个电子证据开示资料库，其中包括撤销权诉讼被告有权进行证据开示的文件。见证据开示程序 ¶¶ 2-4。该资料库将设有资料室，涵盖可预见将在撤销权诉讼中进行证据开示的事项。寻求从受托人处取得进一步书面证据开示的撤销权诉讼被告，应首先勤勉地寻求从资料室取得文件和信息；当多名撤销权诉讼被告寻求就相同或类似事项进行证据开示时，必须作出合理努力与其他撤销权诉讼被告协调。见同上 ¶ 6。\n\nb. 采纳一项一般适用于撤销权诉讼的证据开示时间表，但可由各方约定最多修改九十 (90) 日，并可由本院命令作进一步修改。见同上 ¶ 5。\n\nc. 要求撤销权诉讼被告协调进行证言录取证据开示，包括通过综合证言录取程序，以尽量减少就相同事项反复录取同一证人证言的风险。见同上 ¶ 10。\n\n19. 最后，拟议命令规定，具有诉讼资格并希望对受托人关于 Despins v. ACA Capital Group Ltd.（ACA资本集团有限公司）, et al., Adv. Proc. No. 24-05249（“第一\n\n6 特定另我被告为：G Club International Limited（G Club 国际有限公司）；G Club Operations LLC（G Club 运营有限责任公司）；Himalaya International Financial Group Limited（喜马拉雅国际金融集团有限公司）；Himalaya International Reserves Limited（喜马拉雅国际储备有限公司）；Himalaya International Clearing Limited（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）；Himalaya International Payments Limited（喜马拉雅国际支付有限公司）；Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.（喜马拉雅货币清算有限公司）；ACA Capital Group Ltd.（ACA 资本集团有限公司）；Hamilton Capital Holding Limited（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）；Hamilton Investment Management Limited（汉密尔顿投资管理有限公司）；Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC（汉密尔顿机会基金 SPC）；Anton Development Limited（安东开发有限公司）；Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方利润有限公司）；Gold Perfect Limited（黄金完美有限公司）；Group Dynasty Limited（集团王朝有限公司）；Joy Chance Holdings Limited（乐机控股有限公司）；Pacific King Investment Limited（太平洋王者投资有限公司）；Strong Country\n\n合并另我诉讼”）以及 AA Global Ventures Limited（AA 全球风险投资有限公司）等，Adv Proc. No. 24-05233（“第二合并另我诉讼”，并与第一合并另我诉讼合称“合并另我诉讼”）系债务人的另我和/或在衡平法上或受益所有权上由债务人所有的实体，可介入适用的合并另我诉讼，且无论是否进行此类介入，撤销被告均应受合并另我诉讼中就特定另我被告作出的任何判决书约束。\n\n请求救济的依据\n\n20. 拟议命令中的程序为进一步审理受托人的撤销请求提供了有序程序。\n\nA. 调解程序\n\n21. 对于有意如此做的被告，调解程序为受托人、撤销被告及相对方就撤销请求寻求协商解决提供了宝贵资源。受托人拟通过修订程序中的调解程序继续利用调解程序。\n\n22. 与此同时，目前被转介至调解程序的部分撤销被告几乎未表现出任何寻求协商和解的意愿。\n\n23. 截至目前，受托人在调解程序中针对撤销被告的请求之诉讼已被中止；但许多该等被告参与合并撤诉动议书面陈述除外。[7] 对于无意通过调解积极寻求和解的撤销被告，诉讼应继续进行。此外，\n\nStrong Country Holdings Group Limited（强国控股集团有限公司）；AAGV Limited（AAGV 有限公司）；Joincorp International Limited（Joincorp 国际有限公司）；Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）；及 Ampleforth Capital Ltd.（安普尔福斯资本有限公司）。\n\n7 某些撤销被告最初认为联合撤诉动议的书面陈述将有助于各方在和解谈判中取得进展。然而，在本院作出裁定后，大多数撤销被告并未重新参与调解程序，而是未能成功地试图在地区法院提出中间上诉。\n\n自愿调解程序将确保调解员的时间和精力这一宝贵资源得以保留，用于各方最有可能受益的争议（即各方实际有意寻求和解的争议）。\n\n24. 在此修订结构下，亦宜将后勤和程序事项（程序的排期和形式等）交由调解员酌情决定。无论如何，截至目前，各方通常均就这些事项听从调解员的安排；在各方均有意进行和解谈判的情况下，各方一直以合作和灵活的方式参与调解程序。\n\nB. 证据开示程序\n\n25. 本院还应批准拟议的、规范撤销诉讼中证据开示程序的证据开示程序。债务人诈欺性空壳公司操作的范围和复杂性显而易见，受托人的调查已积累大量文件和信息，其中大部分很可能须在撤销诉讼中进行证据开示。\n\n26. 此外，许多撤销诉讼将涉及就类似或相同事项进行证据开示。因此，受托人提出了合乎常理的措施，以提高效率，并在可能的情况下限制不必要的重复证据开示程序。\n\n27. 第一，规定受托人通过按共同事项而非按被告逐一组织的数据室电子资料库提供文件，将提高效率。[8] 这也将使撤销被告受益，因为其可在证据开示程序开始时获得受托人已提供的书面材料，而无需送达书面证据开示请求。\n\n8 如证据开示程序第 5(a) 段所述，向撤销被告授予访问权限的具体数据室将根据与任何被告诉讼相关的撤销请求，按被告逐一确定。\n\n28. 通过要求撤销被告在送达书面证据开示请求前与受托人会商，并要求被告首先从资料库中查找文件和信息，且就涉及类似事项的书面证据开示与其他撤销被告进行合理协调，将进一步提高效率并避免重复。\n\n29. 此等程序在本案中尤为适宜，因为受托人的绝大多数文件和信息并非其自身业务文件，而是在进行历时多年的《破产规则》第 2004 条调查过程中收集的材料。\n\n30. 第二，通常适用的证据开示时间表可按请求逐项延长，将在统一排期的效率与在有必要时作出调整的灵活性之间取得平衡。该程序还将免除本院在近期内为证据开示排期举行数十次审前会议的必要。\n\n31. 第三，通过要求参与证据开示的各方协调进行证言录取，证据开示程序将减少重复证言录取的需要。允许证言录取以未经协调的方式进行，可能导致众多当事人就同一证人发出证言录取通知和传票。这不仅会浪费受托人的时间（从而浪费破产财产资源），而且几乎必然会导致第三方证人降低合作意愿；可以理解的是，他们不会愿意就同一事项反复接受证言录取。\n\nC. 介入通知\n\n32. 最后，本院应命令，希望对受托人关于特定另我被告系债务人的另我和/或该等被告或其财产在衡平法上或受益所有权上由债务人所有的主张提出争议的撤销被告，仅可通过及时介入合并另我诉讼提出该等争议。受托人在合并另我诉讼中提出的请求，构成受托人就经由特定另我被告作出的转让所提出撤销请求的基础。确实，正因如此，受托人就该等转让提出请求的撤销起诉状通常通过援引方式纳入受托人在合并另我诉讼中提交的对抗程序起诉状。\n\n33. 根据适用于撤销诉讼的《联邦破产程序规则》第 7024 条，《联邦民事诉讼规则》第 24(b) 条规定，本院可批准任何“其请求或抗辩与主诉讼具有共同法律或事实问题”的当事人进行许可介入。\n\n34. 如无单一审判场所裁判受托人针对特定另我被告的请求，受托人预计众多撤销被告可能试图在数十个对抗程序中重新审理相同的法律和事实争议。其结果将给各方和本院造成大量不必要的成本和延误，并有产生无数重复程序的风险。为免生疑，撤销被告将受合并另我诉讼中就特定另我被告作出的任何裁定约束，无论受托人针对撤销被告的请求是否因任何其他原因被中止（包括但不限于因其列载于修订程序附件 3-A 或 3-B，或因其受调解程序约束）。\n\n35. 为明确起见，介入权应限于有资格对该等事项提出争议的撤销被告（即受托人主张经由一个或多个特定另我被告向撤销被告作出了转让的情形）。因此，本院应允许受托人对相关撤销被告不具资格的任何介入通知提出异议。[9]\n\n会商程序\n\n36. 不迟于 June 17, 2025，受托人在当时所有待决撤销诉讼中提交了修订程序的初步草案。受托人在此过程中征求所有撤销被告对拟议修订程序的意见。\n\n37. 受托人已考虑二十多名撤销被告提交的书面意见。受托人还与近 20 名撤销被告的律师举行了多次长时间会商。\n\n38. 通过该过程，并考虑所收到的意见，受托人已对修订程序（尤其是拟议证据开示程序）作出多项重大调整。确实，受托人上月向最初提交意见的撤销被告分发了修订程序的修订草案；受托人考虑到进一步收到的意见后，仍在对该草案作进一步修订。\n\n通知及不存在先前请求\n\n39. 受托人将于下列案件中提交本动议及就本动议排期举行听证的任何通知或命令（“听证通知”）：(a) 第 11 章案件，(b) 所有待决撤销诉讼（无论是否中止），以及 (c) 合并另我诉讼。因此，将向有资格在该等程序中接收电子通知的所有出庭当事人发出通知。受托人还将通过美国邮政向所有未出庭的撤销被告寄送本动议及任何听证通知。\n\n9 受托人寻求此项救济，并不放弃，而是明确维持其立场，即本院现有的、认定某些实体为债务人的另我和/或在衡平法上或受益所有权上由债务人所有的所有裁定，均对撤销被告有效并具有约束力。\n\n前述内容构成适当且充分的通知，受托人主张不应要求作出进一步通知。\n\n40. 未曾向本院或任何其他法院提出任何其他或先前动议以请求本动议所寻求的救济。\n\n［本页其余部分特意留白。］\n\n因此，本院应通过作出拟议命令准许本动议，并授予其他公正且适当的进一步救济。\n\n日期：August 28, 2025\nNew Haven, Connecticut\n\n签署人：/s/ Patrick R. Linsey\n\nPatrick R. Linsey（ct29437）\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩及蒙蒂斯律师事务所）\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n以及\n\nNicholas A. Bassett（特别许可出庭）\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP（保罗·黑斯廷斯律师事务所）\n2050 M Street NW\nWashington, D.C., 20036\n(202) 551-1902\nnicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n以及\n\nDouglass Barron（特别许可出庭）\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP\n200 Park Avenue\nNew York, New York 10166\n(212) 318-6690\naviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n第 11 章受托人的律师\n\n案件 22-50073　文书 4628　提交于 08/28/25　登记于 08/28/25 16:20:57　第 14 页，共 53 页\n\n附件 1\n\n（拟议命令）\n\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国破产法院康涅狄格地区布里奇波特分院）\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　：\n：\n第11章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）等　：\n：\n案号 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。1　：\n：\n共同管理\n：\n---------------------------------------------------------------　x\n[拟议]裁定，准许\n第11章受托人提出的动议，请求作出裁定：(I) 补充、修改并取代(A)责令各方进行调解、指定尊敬的 James J. Tancredi（詹姆斯·J·坦克雷迪）法官担任调解员并修改批准适用于撤销权请求对抗程序之程序的裁定；以及(B)修改责令各方进行调解、指定尊敬的 James J. Tancredi（詹姆斯·J·坦克雷迪）法官担任调解员并修改批准适用于撤销权请求对抗程序之程序的裁定，以促进协商一致的诉前及出庭前调解的裁定；以及(II)批准适当的撤销权被告就针对特定另我被告的另我请求介入合并另我诉讼\n\n经 Luc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯平斯）以 HO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）（“债务人”）第11章受托人（“受托人”）身份提出的动议（“动议”），请求作出裁定（“本裁定”），以(i)补充、修改并取代(a)本院的《责令各方进行调解、指定尊敬的 James J. Tancredi（詹姆斯·J·坦克雷迪）法官担任调解员并修改批准适用于撤销权请求对抗程序之程序的裁定》[ECF No. 3163]（“诉讼程序裁定”）；及(b)本院修改诉讼程序的裁定\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）（亦称 Guo Wengui（郭文贵）、Miles Guo（郭文贵）及 Miles Kwok（郭文贵），以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（Genever 控股有限责任公司）（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever 控股公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC（Genever 控股有限责任公司）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever 控股公司）的邮寄地址为 Paul Hastings LLP（普衡律师事务所）, 200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，转交 Luc A. Despins（卢克·A·德斯平斯），作为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）破产财产的受托人（仅为通知及通信之目的）。\n\n裁定，以批准适用于协商一致的诉前及出庭前调解的程序[ECF No. 3465]（“诉前程序裁定”，与诉讼程序裁定合称“程序裁定”）；及(ii)批准相关撤销权被告为特定目的介入 Despins v. ACA Capital Group Ltd.（ACA 资本集团有限公司）, et al., Adv. Proc. No. 24- 05249（“第一宗合并另我诉讼”），及/或 AA Global Ventures Limited（AA 全球创投有限公司）, et al., Adv Proc. No. 24-05233（“第二宗合并另我诉讼”，与第一宗合并另我诉讼合称“合并另我诉讼”）；本院已认定，动议所请求的救济符合债务人第11章破产财产、其债权人及所有利害关系方的最佳利益；且鉴于已在特定情形下就动议发出适当且充分的通知；且显示无需发出其他或进一步通知；且经于 \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ \\_\\_, 2025 举行的听证会程序；且对本裁定所请求救济的任何异议已被撤回或经实体审理驳回；并经适当审议且有充分理由，特此裁定：\n\n1. 按照本裁定所述，准许该动议。\n\n2. 特此批准并裁定随附作为附件A的经修改撤销权诉讼和调解程序，包括但不限于所附的证据开示程序（合称“经修改程序”）。[2]\n\n3. 本裁定及随附的经修改程序应修改并取代现有程序裁定。\n\n4. 于以下较晚日期当日或之前：(a)本裁定录入后 thirty (30) 日；或(b)对于在提交动议后提起的任何撤销权诉讼，传票及对抗程序起诉状送达后 sixty (60) 日，任何希望对受托人的下述主张提出争议的撤销权被告：\n\n2 本裁定中未明确界定的首字母大写术语，应采用经修改程序中赋予该等术语的含义。\n\n即，G Club International Limited（G Club 国际有限公司）；G Club Operations LLC（G Club 运营有限责任公司）；Himalaya International Financial Group Limited（喜马拉雅国际金融集团有限公司）；Himalaya International Reserves Limited（喜马拉雅国际储备有限公司）；Himalaya International Clearing Limited（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）；Himalaya International Payments Limited（喜马拉雅国际支付有限公司）；Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd.（喜马拉雅货币清算有限公司）；ACA Capital Group Ltd.（ACA 资本集团有限公司）；Hamilton Capital Holding Limited（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）；Hamilton Investment Management Limited（汉密尔顿投资管理有限公司）；Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC（汉密尔顿机会基金 SPC）；Anton Development Limited（安东发展有限公司）；Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方盈利有限公司）；Gold Perfect Limited（金完美有限公司）；Group Dynasty Limited（集团王朝有限公司）；Joy Chance Holdings Limited（乐成控股有限公司）；Pacific King Investment Limited（太平洋王投资有限公司）；Strong Country Holdings Group Limited（强国控股集团有限公司）；AAGV Limited（AAGV 有限公司）；Joincorp International Limited（Joincorp 国际有限公司）；Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）；及/或 Ampleforth Capital Ltd.（Ampleforth 资本有限公司）（合称“指定另我被告”）为债务人的另我及/或其或其财产由债务人在衡平法上或作为受益人所有（该等主张合称“另我请求”），应在该等请求待决的合并另我诉讼中提交介入通知。介入通知应确认介入的撤销权被告，并确认撤销权被告寻求介入的具体另我请求。\n\n5. 介入的撤销权被告参与合并另我诉讼程序的权利，应限于该撤销权被告已确认且具备诉讼资格提出争议的请求。除非及时提交，任何介入通知均不生效。\n\n6. 在提交任何介入通知后 thirty (30) 日内，受托人可基于以下理由，在相关合并另我诉讼中提交异议，以反对撤销权被告介入合并另我诉讼：(a)受托人对撤销权被告参与合并另我诉讼的诉讼资格提出争议，或介入通知中所述的介入范围超出该等诉讼资格；或(b)介入通知不及时。提交该等异议后，相关撤销权被告可在 fourteen (14) 日内提交答复，之后本院应解决受托人的异议。如受托人未提出异议，则撤销权被告在介入通知所述范围内介入合并另我诉讼，应视为获准。\n\n7. 合并另我诉讼中就指定另我被告作出的任何判决书，对所有撤销权被告均具有约束力，无论撤销权被告是否在相关合并另我诉讼中提交介入通知。为免疑义，尽管经修改程序中有任何相反规定，这应包括受托人针对其提出的撤销权请求以其他方式被中止的撤销权被告。\n\n8. 本院保留对因实施本裁定而产生或与之相关的一切事项的管辖权。\n\n9. 本裁定应于录入后立即生效。\n\n附件A\n\n（经修改撤销权诉讼和调解程序）\n经修改撤销权诉讼和调解程序\n\na. 经修改撤销权诉讼程序（可进一步修改，“经修改程序”）应适用于：(i)受托人于 February 1, 2024 当日或之后提起的任何对抗程序，其中受托人仅依据《破产法典》第544、547、548、549及550条以及适用州法下的类似请求提出请求（“撤销权诉讼”）；及/或(ii)就调解程序（定义如下）而言，受托人提出或可能提出的任何请求。\n\nb. 在提交提起任何撤销权诉讼的起诉状（“撤销权起诉状”）时，受托人应提交一份经修改撤销权诉讼和调解程序适用通知，其格式应与随附作为附件1的格式基本相似（“经修改程序通知”）。受托人应依照《破产规则》第7004条，将经修改程序通知副本连同传票及撤销权起诉状送达每一名撤销权诉讼被告（“撤销权被告”）。\n\nc. 影响多宗撤销权诉讼的动议，应在每一适用的撤销权诉讼中提交，并应使用与随附作为附件2的格式基本相同的抬头。\n\nd. 如撤销权起诉状（包括附件）含有根据经修改的保护令[主案件 ECF Nos. 923, 3264, 4448]（可进一步修改，“保护令”）及经修改的保护令约定附录[主案件 ECF Nos. 2460, 3264, 4448]（可进一步修改，“保护令附录”）被指定为保密或高度保密的信息，受托人可密封提交该撤销权起诉状（“密封撤销权起诉状”）；但受托人应公开提交撤销权起诉状副本，其中删节任何被指定为保密或高度保密的信息（“删节撤销权起诉状”）。送达删节撤销权起诉状，构成《破产规则》第7004条要求的充分起诉状送达。尽管保护令及保护令附录中有任何相反规定，在任何撤销权被告及其律师各自签署保护令附件A以及（如适用）保护令附录附件A的副本后（“保护令同意书”），受托人可向该撤销权被告提供未删节的撤销权起诉状副本。任何自行代理的撤销权被告出庭后，该撤销权被告应与受托人的律师协商，并告知其倾向于通过电子邮件还是通过美国邮政接收通知，受托人应依照其表明的偏好向自行代理的撤销权被告提供任何所需通知。\n\ne. 撤销权被告对任何撤销权起诉状作出答复的期限（“答复日期”）为向该撤销权被告完成送达之日起 sixty (60) 日；但无需本院进一步裁定，受托人和任何撤销权被告可约定将被告的答复日期进一步延长最多 ninety (90) 日。任何该等约定均应以书面作出，且受托人应在适用撤销权诉讼的案卷中提交该等约定，或以其他方式提交有关约定延长期限的通知。尽管本程序中有任何相反规定：\n\ni. 随附作为附件3-A所列撤销权被告的请求（“中止的撤销权请求”）应予中止，等待本院进一步裁定。在解除中止的撤销权请求之中止时，本院应确定中止的撤销权请求是否应受调解程序约束，并为该等诉讼中的撤销权被告就撤销权起诉状作出答复设定期限。为免疑义，尽管存在该等中止，中止的撤销权请求的某些方面可能通过本院批准该等经修改程序的裁定中所述程序而受到诉讼和具有约束力的裁判（即，在本院裁定所定义的合并另我诉讼中）。\n\nii. 对本文件所附附件3-B中列明的撤销之诉被告提出的请求（“部分中止的撤销请求”），就任何涉及以下法律或事实问题的事项，应仅在等待法院进一步命令期间予以中止：AA Global Ventures Limited（AA环球创投有限公司）；AAGV Limited（AAGV有限公司）；Alzarro Enterprises Ltd.（阿尔扎罗企业有限公司）；Ampleforth Capital Ltd.（安普尔福思资本有限公司）；Assets Sino Limited（中资产有限公司）；Auspicious Coast Limited（吉祥海岸有限公司）；BSA Strategic Fund I（BSA战略基金I）；Canadian Agri-product Monetary Investments Limited（加拿大农产品货币投资有限公司）；Crane Advisory Group LLC（克兰咨询集团有限责任公司）；Delta Konsult Limited（德尔塔咨询有限公司）；Eagle Eye Investments Limited（鹰眼投资有限公司）；Fiesta Investment Ltd.（菲耶斯塔投资有限公司）；Glory Asia (H.K.) Limited（荣耀亚洲〔香港〕有限公司）；Gold Perfect Limited（黄金完美有限公司）；Group Dynasty Limited（集团王朝有限公司）；GS Security Solutions Inc.（GS安保解决方案公司）；Guang Hong Limited（广宏有限公司）；H Reserve Management Limited（H储备管理有限公司）；Head Win Group Limited（海德温集团有限公司）；Holy City Hong Kong Ventures Limited（圣城香港创投有限公司）；Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）；Hudson Diamond Holdings, Inc.（哈德逊钻石控股公司）；Infinity Treasury Management Inc.（无限资金管理公司）；Insight Phoenix Fund（洞察凤凰基金）；Joincorp International Limited（联企国际有限公司）；Joy Chance Holdings Limited（喜运控股有限公司）；Kingdom Rich Limited（富国有限公司）；Long Gate Limited（长龙门有限公司）；New Miracle Limited（新奇迹有限公司）；Pacific King Investment Limited（太平洋王投资有限公司）；Rich Group Development Limited（富集团发展有限公司）；Rising Sun Capital Ltd.（旭日资本有限公司）；River Valley Operations LLC（河谷运营有限责任公司）；Sail Victory Limited（扬帆胜利有限公司）；Strong Country Holdings Group Limited（强国控股集团有限公司）；Thousand Stars Company Limited（千星有限公司）；New Dynamic Development Limited（新动力发展有限公司）；ACA Capital Group Ltd（ACA资本集团有限公司）；Anton Development Limited（安东发展有限公司）；G Club International Limited（G俱乐部国际有限公司）；G Club Operations LLC（G俱乐部运营有限责任公司）；G Fashion（G时尚）；G Fashion Media Group Inc.（G时尚媒体集团公司）；GFNY Inc.（GFNY公司）；Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）；Himalaya International Clearing Ltd（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）；Leading Shine Limited（领先光辉有限公司）；Rule of Law Foundation III Inc.（法治基金会III公司）；Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会IV公司）；Saraca Media Group Inc.（萨拉卡媒体集团公司）；AA环球创投有限公司；AAGV有限公司；阿尔扎罗企业有限公司；安普尔福思资本有限公司；中资产有限公司；吉祥海岸有限公司；BSA战略基金I；加拿大农产品货币投资有限公司；克兰咨询集团有限责任公司；德尔塔咨询有限公司；鹰眼投资有限公司；菲耶斯塔投资有限公司；荣耀亚洲（香港）有限公司；黄金完美有限公司；集团王朝有限公司；GS安保解决方案公司；广宏有限公司；H储备管理有限公司；海德温集团有限公司；HGA Property Operation LLC（HGA物业运营有限责任公司）；圣城香港创投有限公司；香港国际基金投资有限公司；哈德逊钻石控股公司；无限资金管理公司；洞察凤凰基金；联企国际有限公司；喜运控股有限公司；富国有限公司；长龙门有限公司；新奇迹有限公司；太平洋王投资有限公司；富集团发展有限公司；旭日资本有限公司；河谷运营有限责任公司；扬帆胜利有限公司；强国控股集团有限公司；及/或千星有限公司是否为债务人的替身实体，及/或该等实体的财产是否为债务人的财产及/或债务人第11章财产团的财产（统称“中止事项”）。为免生疑，中止事项可在自愿基础上进行调解，且亦可通过法院批准本修订程序的命令中所述程序进行诉讼及具有约束力的裁决（即法院命令所定义的综合替身实体诉讼）。\n\niii. 在提起任何新的撤销之诉时或之后，受托人可通过在相关撤销之诉中提交指定通知（“中止指定通知”），将该诉讼中的请求指定为中止的撤销请求或部分中止的撤销请求。任何希望对中止指定通知提出异议的撤销之诉被告，应在其于该相关诉讼中出庭后七（7）日内，就该通知在相关撤销之诉中提交答复；受托人可在该答复提交后十四（14）日内提交回复。有关中止指定通知的任何争议均应由法院裁定。\n\nf. 如任何撤销之诉被告通过根据《民事规则》第12条提交动议而答复撤销之诉状，受托人应有六十（60）日对该动议作出答复；但如该动议涉及已被中止的请求，或涉及在该动议待决期间变为中止的请求，则受托人应在中止终止后六十（60）日内对该动议作出答复。撤销之诉被告应有三十（30）日对受托人就根据《民事规则》第12条提交的动议所作出的任何答复提交回复。\n\ng. 除非法院另有命令，任何撤销之诉中的证据开示前，均不应举行根据《破产规则》第7016条进行的首次审前会议；因此，由法院书记员签发并由受托人送达的传票将不载明审前会议日期。如撤销之诉的一方认为有必要召开审前会议以处理排期或其他问题，任何一方均可随时通过在该撤销之诉案卷中提交申请，请求召开该会议。\n\nh. 任何撤销之诉中就任何未被中止的请求进行的证据开示，应依照本文件所附附件4中的证据开示程序（“证据开示程序”）进行。《民事规则》第26条（以《破产规则》第7026条纳入的范围为限）及康涅狄格州联邦地区法院地方法则第7026-1条应适用于撤销之诉，但以本修订程序（包括但不限于所附证据开示程序）明确修改的范围为限。为免生疑，在调解程序期间有效的中止应包括所有正式证据开示，但不应阻止在自愿基础上或经指定调解员（定义见本文件）指示而进行的任何非正式文件或信息交换。\n\ni. 任何撤销之诉的一方均可在显示正当理由后，请求修改本修订程序在该撤销之诉中的适用。该等修改应通过在适用的撤销之诉中提交动议提出请求。\n\nj. 受托人已提出或可能提出的任何请求，包括但不限于撤销请求，均应受本文件第（k）至（w）段所述调解程序（“调解程序”）的以下程序约束。\n\nk. 受托人与受托人认为可能受财产团所拥有请求约束的任何其他一方（“相对方”），可约定（“调解约定”）将受托人针对该相对方的请求（“经调解请求”）移交非约束性调解程序（如本文件所述，“调解程序”）。调解约定应按如下方式作出：\n\ni. 调解约定应以书面形式作出，并由受托人及适用的相对方签署，且应确认受托人及相对方同意调解程序。\n\nii. 在待决撤销之诉中的调解约定，应在适用的撤销之诉中提交。\n\niii. 调解约定应连同致Tancredi法官的联合函件（无论以信函或电子邮件形式），通过Tancredi法官的调解电子邮箱提交给United States Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi（美国破产法院法官James J. Tancredi）（“调解移交”）；该函件应附上适用的调解约定，并简要地（且以非辩论性方式）说明经调解请求。\n\nl. 如在受托人与相对方（统称“调解当事人”）签署调解约定时，受托人已对该相对方提起诉讼，则该诉讼应予中止（包括但不限于该相对方答复撤销之诉状的义务），直至调解程序结束。如任何诉讼期限原本会在调解程序期间或其终止后三十（30）日内届满，该等期限应中止计算，直至调解程序终止后三十（30）日的首个营业日；但就受托人在调解程序前或期间答复根据《民事规则》第12条提交的动议的任何期限而言，受托人答复该动议的期限应为调解程序终止后六十（60）日的首个营业日。为免生疑，尽管有该等中止，经调解请求的某些方面仍可通过法院批准本修订程序的命令中所述程序进行诉讼及具有约束力的裁决（即法院命令所定义的综合替身实体诉讼）。\n\nm. United States Bankruptcy Judge James J. Tancredi（美国破产法院法官James J. Tancredi）（“Tancredi法官”）已被指定为首席调解员，参见原《命令各方参加调解、指定尊敬的James J. Tancredi为调解员及修订批准适用于撤销请求对抗程序的程序之命令》[主案ECF No. 3163]，并应继续监督所有调解程序；但调解应由Tancredi法官或经批准的调解员名册中的调解员（“调解员名册”）进行。调解员名册成员应由Tancredi法官选定，但须经法院批准对各该调解员的任命及适用于该任命的报酬费率。为免生疑，受托人或任何相对方均可向Tancredi法官建议任命至调解员名册的潜在调解员，且Tancredi法官可自行决定就其建议与受托人或该相对方协商。受托人应仅通过在主案中提交动议，并在任何待决撤销之诉中提交通知，请求法院批准由Tancredi法官选定的调解员；调解员被任命至调解员名册，应在法院审议该动议及对其提出的任何异议或答复后，经法院批准时生效。有关调解程序当事人补偿任何指定调解员的责任的所有事项，应保留至任何需要报酬的调解员（如有）被指定至调解员名册后再行处理。\n\nn. 在收到调解移交后，Tancredi法官应将经调解请求指定由其本人或调解员名册成员（“指定调解员”）进行调解。Tancredi法官亦可命令合并相关调解程序（包括在适当情况下，在单一撤销之诉中针对多名被告提出请求的情形）。指定调解员在收到其指定通知后，应确定其是否就经调解请求存在任何利益冲突；如存在利益冲突，除非该等利益冲突已向调解当事人披露并获其明确放弃，否则其应自行回避，且不得在该特定调解中行事。如指定调解员回避，Tancredi法官应从调解员名册中指定替代调解员，或指定其本人进行调解。如调解当事人认为利益冲突妨碍指定调解员履职，或以其他方式反对指定该指定调解员，该方可通过其调解电子邮箱向Tancredi法官提交函件（副本送交对方当事人及指定调解员），请求指定另一名指定调解员。\n\no. 与调解程序相关的所有程序和书面材料均应被视为享有特权并属保密，且受 Federal Rule of Evidence 408（《联邦证据规则》第408条）规定的所有保护；除为证明一方未遵守调解程序规定外，不得以任何理由报道或作为证据采纳。在调解程序期间或之后的任何时候，均不得进行速记、书面、电子或任何其他形式的录制或互联网发布，但为记录经 Tancredi法官（Judge Tancredi）批准的最终和解协议者除外。Tancredi法官（包括但不限于其作为首席调解员及指定调解员的身份）、任何其他指定调解员及其各自代理人，对于与调解程序有关的任何作为或不作为，均享有州法、联邦法及普通法规定的绝对司法豁免，不承担责任；除本段规定外，亦不受与调解程序有关的要求其作证或提交文件的强制程序约束，并应由所有参与调解各方使其免受损害。除本段规定外，任何指定调解员或 Tancredi法官均不得被任何一方传唤或作为证人或专家证人出庭。任何一方均不得试图强制指定调解员（包括其代理人、合伙人或其各自律师事务所或组织的雇员）或 Tancredi法官（包括其代理人、合伙人或雇员）作证或提交文件；但经法院命令，任何一方可传唤指定调解员或 Tancredi法官作为证人，并可在指称一方未遵守调解程序规定的程序中强制其在有限范围内作证。除非法院另有命令，各方提交给指定调解员或 Tancredi法官的任何文件，均应在调解程序终止后三十（30）日内销毁。\n\np. 指定调解员应主持任何调解会议，证据规则不适用。指定调解员应确定任何调解会议的形式，包括但不限于：(i) 任何会议的时长和日程安排；(ii) 陈述的顺序和形式；(iii) 会议地点以及会议是现场举行还是通过视频会议举行；(iv) 是否要求参与调解各方提交书面材料；以及 (v) 是否要求仅律师和/或有权就经调解请求达成和解的客户代表出席调解会议。指定调解员可实施在具体情况下合理且切实可行的任何程序。授权 Tancredi法官在调解程序期间寻求其认为为协助调解所必需的对调解程序规定的任何修改。任何参与调解一方均可在其指定调解员认为适当的范围内与指定调解员进行单方沟通。受托人及其律师可就这些调解程序规定的实施、调解员小组成员的选任、撤销诉讼的分类和/或 Tancredi法官向法院提出的任何建议，与 Tancredi法官进行单方沟通。\n\nq. 参与调解各方应依照调解程序规定及适用的指定调解员的指示，秉持诚信并以达成协商一致的解决方案为目标参加调解程序。指定调解员可通过书面通知向法院报告任何未遵守调解程序规定的情形，Tancredi法官应促使该书面通知在任何适用的对抗诉讼中或以其他方式在主案中提交备案。如参与调解一方未遵守调解程序规定，法院可（无论任何一方是否提出动议）安排听证，以审议对未遵守规定的一方施加制裁是否适当。该等制裁可包括但不限于，责令未遵守规定的一方承担调解程序费用和/或对方律师费。此外，在故意、持续或严重不遵守规定的情形下，法院可对未遵守调解程序规定的一方作出缺席判决或驳回裁定。未能达成和解和/或调解程序终止本身，不得构成认定“恶意”或施加制裁的依据。指定调解员（Tancredi法官除外）可在任何时候以任何理由向 Tancredi法官建议，将任何经调解请求的调解程序重新指派。\n\nr. 如调解程序就全部或部分经调解请求成功达成和解，指定调解员应编制一份报告（“调解员报告”），说明参与调解各方是否遵守了这些调解程序规定。指定调解员可以但无义务在该调解员报告中说明，其是否认为拟议和解的经济条件及和解协议条款，依照 In re Iridium Operating LLC, 478 F.3d 452, 462 (2d Cir. 2007) 的标准衡量，属公平、合理并符合 Chapter 11（第11章）财产的最佳利益。如经调解请求属于待决对抗诉讼的标的，Tancredi法官应促使调解员报告在适用的对抗诉讼中提交备案。如经调解请求并非待决对抗诉讼的标的，指定调解员应将调解员报告发送给受托人，受托人应向适用的相对方提供该报告副本。调解员报告不得涉及调解讨论的实质内容，亦不得提供可能达成的任何和解的细节。\n\ns. 在任何表明达成全部或部分和解的调解员报告出具后，受托人应在切实可行的最短时间内提交动议，请求法院批准。若受托人认为公开披露和解条款将损害财产和/或将涉及商业敏感或其他保密信息，而公开披露该等信息将损害和解当事人，受托人可在密封状态下提交寻求该等批准的动议（仅限受托人、相关相对方、无担保债权人官方委员会律师及美国受托人查阅）。如动议在密封状态下提交，受托人应在公开案卷上提交该动议副本，并删节任何商业敏感或其他保密信息。\n\nt. 调解员小组成员应就其获指派的调解程序的状态定期与 Tancredi法官协商。Tancredi法官可就调解程序的进展情况以及 Tancredi法官为促进撤销诉讼和/或经调解请求的高效管理而提出的任何建议，向法院提交报告。该等报告应以书面形式出具，并在主案案卷中提交，同时通知将受到 Tancredi法官任何建议影响的任何撤销诉讼被告。在举行听证以审议 Tancredi法官的建议及任何及时提交的书面答复后，法院无需提出动议即可作出处理该等建议的进一步命令。\n\nu. 调解程序规定可经法院进一步命令修改，包括但不限于受托人或任何利害关系方在主案中基于正当理由提出的动议，或法院以其认为适当的其他方式作出的修改，包括但不限于根据 Tancredi法官的建议。\n\nv. 调解程序应于下列最早发生者终止：出具表明参与调解各方的经调解请求已获完全解决的调解员报告；任何参与调解一方或 Tancredi法官发出的书面终止通知（“终止通知”）；或法院终止该等程序的命令。任何终止通知应送达下列各方（如适用）：(i) 受托人；(ii) 相对方；(iii) 指定调解员；以及 (iv) Tancredi法官。如终止通知适用于作为对抗诉讼标的的经调解请求，发出通知的一方应促使该终止通知在适用的对抗诉讼中提交备案。上述任何一方均可在任何时候以任何理由发出终止通知。为免生疑，若 Tancredi法官拒绝接受经调解请求进入调解程序，Tancredi法官可在调解移送后立即发出终止通知。\n\nw. 尽管本修订程序中有任何相反规定，调解程序规定可由法院根据受托人或任何其他利害关系方的请求，或依照法院另行作出的命令（包括但不限于根据 Tancredi法官提出的建议），仅通过依照任何适用规则在主案中提交的动议予以修改；但经批准后，修订后的调解程序规定应在所有撤销诉讼中提交备案。\n\n附件1\n\n（修订程序通知）\n\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国破产法院康涅狄格地区布里奇波特分院）\n\n-----------------------------------------------------------　x\n\n关于：　：\n：　第11章\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n等，　：\n：　案件编号：22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。　：\n：　（合并管理）\n\nx\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（卢克·A.·德斯平），第11章　：\n\n受托人，　：\n：　对抗诉讼案号 xx-xxxxx\n诉原告，　：\n\n[　]，　：\n\n被告。　：\n\nx\n\n[格式[ 修订后撤销诉讼及调解程序适用通知\n\n特此通知，准许作出命令的动议之命令：(I)\n\n补充、修订并取代：(A) 要求各方进行调解、指定 The Honorable James J. Tancredi（James J. Tancredi 尊敬的法官）担任调解员，以及修订批准适用于撤销请求对抗诉讼程序的命令；(B) 修订下列命令的命令：\n\n1 本第11章案件中的债务人为 Ho Wan Kwok（又名 Guo Wengui（郭文贵）、Miles Guo（郭文贵）及 Miles Kwok（郭文贵），以及众多其他别名）（税务识别号码后四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（Genever控股有限责任公司）（税务识别号码后四位：8202）及 Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever控股公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC 及 Genever Holdings Corporation 的邮寄地址为：Paul Hastings LLP（保罗·黑斯廷斯律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，转交 Luc A. Despins，作为 Ho Wan Kwok 财产的受托人（仅为通知和通信之目的）。\n\n要求各方进行调解、指定 The Honorable James J. Tancredi 担任调解员，以及修订批准适用于撤销请求对抗诉讼程序的命令，以促进协商一致的诉前及出庭前调解；以及 (II) 批准适当的撤销诉讼被告介入综合替身责任诉讼，以处理针对特定替身责任被告的替身责任请求 [主案 ECF No. (\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_)]，该命令作为附件1附后，包括但不限于其所附的修订后撤销诉讼及调解程序规定，现适用于并管辖本对抗诉讼。\n\n日期：[________]，202_　LUC A. DESPINS\n\n康涅狄格州纽黑文　第11章受托人\n\n签署人：/s/ FORM\n\n[律师（ct）] NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.（纽伯特、佩佩与蒙蒂思专业公司）195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2884 电子邮件：_______ 第11章受托人律师\n\n[格式[ 附件1\n\n（准许提出动议以录入命令的命令：(I) 补充、修订及替代(A)要求各方进行调解、指定尊敬的James J. Tancredi法官（James J. Tancredi）为调解人，以及修订批准适用于撤销权请求对抗程序之程序的命令；及(B)修订关于修订要求各方进行调解、指定尊敬的James J. Tancredi法官（James J. Tancredi）为调解人，以及修订批准适用于撤销权请求对抗程序之程序的命令，以促进双方合意的诉前及出庭前调解的命令；以及(II)批准适当的撤销权被告就针对特定另我被告的另我请求介入合并另我诉讼的命令）\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 4628 Filed 08/28/25 Entered 08/28/25 16:20:57 Page 32 of 53\n附件2\n\n（抬头格式）\n\n美国破产法院\n康涅狄格州地区\n布里奇波特分院\n\nx\n\n关于：　:\n:\n第11章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），1\n等，　:\n:\nCase No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。　:\n:\n（联合管理）\n\nLUC A. DESPINS（Luc A. Despins），第11章\n受托人，\n诉　----------------------------------------------------------------\n原告，　x\n:\n对抗程序案号24-05005、24-05006、\n:\n24-05008、24-05009、24-05010、24-05011、\n:\n24-05012、24-05013、24-05014、24-05015、\n:\n24-05016、24-05017、24-05018、24-05019、\n:\n24-05020、24-05021、24-05022、24-05023、\n\n撤销权被告，　:\n24-05024、24-05025、24-05026、24-05027、\n:\n24-05028、24-05029、24-05030、24-05031、\n:\n24-05032、24-05033、24-05035、24-05036、\n\n被告。　24-05037、24-05038、24-05039、24-05040、\n:\n24-05041、24-05042、24-05043、24-05044、\n:\n24-05045、24-05046、24-05047、24-05048、\n:\n:\n24-05049、24-05050、24-05051、24-05052、\n:\n24-05053、24-05054、24-05055、24-05056、\n:\n24-05057、24-05058、24-05059、24-05060、\n:\n24-05061、24-05062、24-05063、24-05064、\n\n24-05065、24-05066、24-05067、24-05068、\n:\n24-05069、24-05070、24-05071、24-05072、\n:\n24-05073、24-05074、24-05075、24-05076、\n:\n:\n24-05077、24-05078、24-05079、24-05080、\n:\n24-05081、24-05082、24-05084、24-05085、\n:\n24-05086、24-05087、24-05088、24-05089、\n:\n24-05090、24-05091、24-05092、24-05093、\n（抬头续见下一页）　:\n24-05094、24-05095、24-05096、24-05097、\n:\n24-05098、24-05099、24-05100、24-05101、\n\n1　本第11章案件中的债务人为HO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）（又名Guo Wengui、Miles Guo及Miles Kwok，以及其他众多别名）（税务识别号末四位：9595）、Genever Holdings LLC（Genever Holdings有限责任公司）（税务识别号末四位：8202）及Genever Holdings Corporation（Genever Holdings公司）。受托人、Genever Holdings LLC及Genever Holdings Corporation的邮寄地址为Paul Hastings LLP（博衡律师事务所），200 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10166，转交Luc A. Despins（Luc A. Despins），作为HO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）破产财产的受托人（仅为通知及通信之目的）。\n\n: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 24-05102、24-05103、24-05104、24-05105、24-05106、24-05107、24-05108、24-05109、24-05110、24-05111、24-05112、24-05113、24-05114、24-05115、24-05116、24-05117、24-05118、24-05119、24-05120、24-05121、24-05122、24-05123、24-05124、24-05125、24-05126、24-05127、24-05128、24-05129、24-05130、24-05131、24-05133、24-05134、24-05135、24-05136、24-05137、24-05138、24-05139、24-05140、24-05141、24-05142、24-05143、24-05144、24-05145、24-05146、24-05147、24-05148、24-05149、24-05150、24-05151、24-05152、24-05153、24-05154、24-05155、24-05156、24-05157、24-05159、24-05160、24-05161、24-05162、24-05163、24-05164、24-05165、24-05166、24-05167、24-05168、24-05169、24-05170、24-05171、24-05172、24-05173、24-05174、24-05175、24-05176、24-05177、24-05178、24-05179、24-05180、24-05181、24-05182、24-05184、24-05185、24-05186、24-05188、24-05189、24-05190、24-05191、24-05192、24-05193、24-05195、24-05196、24-05197、24-05198、24-05199、24-05200、24-05201、24-05202、24-05203、24-05204、24-05205、24-05206、24-05207、24-05208、24-05209、24-05210、24-05211、24-05212、24-05214、24-05215、24-05216、24-05217、24-05218、24-05219、24-05220、24-05221、24-05222、24-05223、24-05224、24-05225、24-05226、24-05227、24-05228、24-05229、24-05230、24-05231、24-05232、24-05233、24-05234、24-05235、24-05236、24-05237、24-05238、24-05239、24-05240、24-05241、24-05242、24-05243、24-05244、24-05245、24-05246、24-05247、24-05248、24-05250、24-05251、24-05252、24-05253、24-05254、24-05255、24-05256、24-05257、24-05258、24-05259、24-05260、24-05261、24-05262、24-05263、24-05264、24-05265、24-05266、24-05267、24-05268、\n\n（抬头续见下一页）\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------- : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x 24-05269、24-05270、24-05272、24-05274、24-05275、24-05276、24-05279、24-05280、24-05282、24-05286、24-05287、24-05288、24-05289、24-05290、24-05291、24-05292、24-05293、24-05294、24-05295、24-05296、24-05297、24-05298、24-05299、24-05300、24-05301、24-05302、24-05303、24-05304、24-05305、24-05306、24-05307、24-05308、24-05309、24-05310、24-05313、24-05315、24-05316、24-05317、25-05003、25-05004、25-05005、25-05006、25-05007、25-05008、25-05009、25-05010、25-05011、25-05012、25-05013、25-05014、25-05015、25-05016、25-05017、25-05018、25-05019、25-05020、25-05021、25-05022、25-05023、25-05024、25-05025、25-05026、25-05027、25-05028、25-05029、25-05030、25-05031、25-05032、25-05033、25-05034、25-05035、25-05036、25-05037、25-05038、25-05039、25-05040、25-05041、25-05042、25-05043、25-05044、25-05045、25-05046、25-05047、25-05048、25-05049、25-05050、25-05051、25-05052、25-05057、25-05058、25-05059、25-05061、25-05067、25-05068、25-05069、25-05070、25-05071、25-05072、25-05073、25-05074、25-05075、25-05076、25-05077、25-05078、25-05079、25-05080、25-05081、25-05082、25-05083、25-05084、25-05085、25-05086、25-05087、25-05088、25-05089、25-05090、25-05091、25-05092、25-05093、25-05094、25-05095、25-05096、25-05097、25-05098、25-05099、25-05100、25-05101、25-05102、25-05103、25-05104、25-05105\n\n附件3-A\n\n（全面中止的撤销权请求）\n\n对抗程序案号　被告\n\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05008　Boardwalk Motor Imports LLC（Boardwalk机动车进口有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05009　Mercantile Bank International Corp.（商业国际银行公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05012　Ogier（Ogier）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05014　Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP（Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman有限责任合伙律师事务所）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05017　Post Oak Motors, LLC（Post Oak Motors有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05022　FAM United LLC（FAM United有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05023　Studio Cataldi Group SRL（Studio Cataldi Group SRL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05026　Yieldesta LP（Yieldesta有限合伙企业）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05029　Great Bowery Inc dba Camilla Lowther Management（Great Bowery公司，以Camilla Lowther Management名义营业）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05032　Hugga LLC（Hugga有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05037　Triple2 Digital LLC（Triple2 Digital有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05038　D4Zero S.R.L.（D4Zero S.R.L.）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05041　CFG Global Limited（CFG Global Limited）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05043　Loro Piana S.P.A.（Loro Piana S.P.A.）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05045　The Quinlan Law Firm, LLC（Quinlan律师事务所有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05046　Janco SRL（Janco SRL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05050　Oro Mont Alpi SRL（Oro Mont Alpi SRL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05051　Mindy Wechsler（Mindy Wechsler）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05052　MF19 Inc（MF19公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05068　Caribe Condado, LLC（Caribe Condado有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05080　Reinhard Plank S.R.L.（Reinhard Plank S.R.L.）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05084　Tavares Cutting Inc（Tavares Cutting公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05087　Mosaicon Shoes SRL（Mosaicon Shoes SRL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05088　Tokyoseiki Co. LTD（Tokyoseiki有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05089　Pellettieri Di Parma SRL（Pellettieri Di Parma SRL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05091　Shalom B LLC dba Asher Fabric Concepts（Shalom B有限责任公司，以Asher Fabric Concepts名义营业）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05094　Solazzo Calzature S.R.L.（Solazzo Calzature S.R.L.）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05095　SOD Stone Offroad Design GmbH（SOD Stone Offroad Design GmbH）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05096　1245 Factory Place, LLC（1245 Factory Place有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05097　Liapull S.R.L.（Liapull S.R.L.）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05099　American Arbitration Association, Inc.（美国仲裁协会公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05104　Ice24 SRO（Ice24 SRO）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05106　Reach Manufacturing, LLC（Reach Manufacturing有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05111　DNM Beauty Distribution（DNM Beauty Distribution）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05113　1322089 B.C. L.T.D.（1322089 B.C.有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05116　Hilton Management, LLC（Hilton Management有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05118　J Tan Jewelry Design, Inc.（J Tan Jewelry Design公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05121　Shaylen Music LLC（Shaylen Music有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05123　Bestview1 Pty Ltd（Bestview1 Pty Ltd）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05124　Legends OWO LLC（Legends OWO有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05127　Waycap S.P.A.（Waycap S.P.A.）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05129　Fay Ye（Fay Ye）\n\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05131　Lawrence River（Lawrence River）\n\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05136　ASAP SRL（ASAP SRL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05137　Bellerive Attorneys at Law（Bellerive律师事务所）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05139　Houston Litstar LLC（Houston Litstar有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05140　Quinones Law PLLC（Quinones Law专业有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05142　Immobiliara Barbara 2000 SRL（Immobiliara Barbara 2000 SRL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05143　Dream Projects LLC（Dream Projects有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05146　Fortnum Information Security Limited（Fortnum Information Security Limited）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05148　Galaxy Ltd（Galaxy有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05150　Jialin Qin（秦嘉林）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05151　Li Sho Yo（Li Sho Yo）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05153　Ming Ni（Ming Ni）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05155　Hayashi Meiou（Hayashi Meiou）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05156　12476517 Canada Society（12476517 Canada Society）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05157　DP Textile & Apparel Inc（DP Textile & Apparel公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05160　LA International Foundation（LA International Foundation）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05164　National Sweepstakes Company, LLC（National Sweepstakes Company有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05165　Oxford Visionary Ltd.（Oxford Visionary有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05166　Chris Lee（Chris Lee）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05169　D&D Solutions LLC（D&D Solutions有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05170　The Gertz File Investigative Reporting Project Inc（Gertz File调查报道项目公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05173　Wenhua Gong（龚文华）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05176　Luminescence Co Ltd（Luminescence有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05177　Xiaobo He（何小波）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05180　Richmond Strategic Advisor（Richmond Strategic Advisor）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05191　Deng Qian（钱邓）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05193　Fiesta Investments Ltd（Fiesta Investments有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05195　Shujuan Milne（Shujuan Milne）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05197　Great Lakes Drone Company（Great Lakes Drone Company）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05198　G-Service LLC（G-Service有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05205　Marini Pietrantoni Muniz LLC（Marini Pietrantoni Muniz有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05207　Bering Yachts LLC（Bering Yachts有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05210　Jiayao Gan（甘嘉尧）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05215　Bradley Staple, dba Staples Building Solutions（Bradley Staple，以Staples Building Solutions名义营业）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05217　Haisong Peng（彭海松）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05218　Hou Yuan Chan（Hou Yuan Chan）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05224　OSC Orbit Services Company LLC（OSC Orbit Services Company有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05227　Tao Zheng（郑涛）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05230　Cayuse Government Services（Cayuse Government Services）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05231　9 East 40th Street（东40街9号）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05232　Daihao Zhou（周代浩）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05234　Lyzon Enterprises Corporation（Lyzon Enterprises公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05235　Halley Chen CPA Professional Corporation（Halley Chen注册会计师专业公司）\n\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05236　Feng Yi（冯毅）\n\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05237　Qiang Hu（胡强）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05239　Jianhai Jiao（焦建海）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05240　Fengjie Ma（马凤杰）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05241　MZC Financial Inc（MZC Financial公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05242　Cotton Craft Textiles Intl Trading（Cotton Craft Textiles Intl Trading）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05243　Ihotry Ltd（Ihotry有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05244　Quick-Equip LLC（Quick-Equip有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05245　RM Auctions Deutschland GmbH（RM Auctions Deutschland GmbH）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05245　Qiang Guo（郭强）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05246　WA & HF LLC（WA & HF有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05248　Curiosity Corp.（Curiosity公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05248　Flying Colours Corp（Flying Colours公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05248　River Valley Operations LLC（River Valley Operations有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05248　Supreme SG PTE LTD（Supreme SG PTE LTD）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05248　Top California Beach Corporation（Top California Beach公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05248　Wang's Realty Management Service Inc（Wang's Realty Management Service公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05250　Scarabaeus Wealth Management AG（Scarabaeus Wealth Management AG）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05251　LLC Stz Fund No. 1（Stz Fund No. 1有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05252　Gettr USA Inc（Gettr USA公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05253　Ivy Capital Advisor Limited（Ivy Capital Advisor Limited）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05254　NAV Consulting Inc（NAV Consulting公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05255　Ziba Limited（Ziba Limited）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05256　New Mulberry PTE Ltd（New Mulberry PTE Ltd）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05257　Mishcon de Reya LLP（Mishcon de Reya有限责任合伙律师事务所）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05258　Hogan Lovells International LLP（Hogan Lovells International有限责任合伙律师事务所）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05259　Top Target General Trading LLC（Top Target General Trading有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05260　GCP Investment Advisors SL（GCP Investment Advisors SL）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05261　Starling Bank Ltd.（Starling Bank有限公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05262　Red Team Partners（Red Team Partners）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05263　G Club Holdco I LLC（G Club Holdco I有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05263　G Club Three（G Club Three）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05263　HAA Group Pty Ltd（HAA Group Pty Ltd）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05263　Mountains of Spices Inc（Mountains of Spices公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05263　Omicron Nutraceutical LLC（Omicron Nutraceutical有限责任公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05263　Rosy Acme Ventures Limited（Rosy Acme Ventures Limited）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05264　Smaragdos Mamzeris（Smaragdos Mamzeris）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05265　Siu Ming Je（Siu Ming Je）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05266　Gong Jianfen（龚建芬）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05267　Khaled Ashafy（Khaled Ashafy）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05268　Pure Global Group Limited（Pure Global Group Limited）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05269　Himalaya Australia Athena Farm Inc.（Himalaya Australia Athena Farm公司）\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05269　Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd（Himalaya Australia PTY Ltd）\n\nAdv. Proc. No. 24-05269　Himalaya Boston Mayflower LLC（Himalaya Boston Mayflower有限责任公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Himalaya New World Inc（喜马拉雅新世界公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Himalaya New York Rock Inc（喜马拉雅纽约岩石公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Himalaya Shanghai Farm LLC（喜马拉雅上海农场有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Himalaya UK Club（喜马拉雅英国俱乐部）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Himalaya Worldwide SL（喜马拉雅环球SL公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　HML Vancouver Sailing Farm Ltd（HML温哥华帆船农场有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　Golden Gate Himalaya Farm LLC（金门喜马拉雅农场有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　MOS Himalaya Foundation Inc（MOS喜马拉雅基金会公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05269　UK Himalaya Ltd（英国喜马拉雅有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05270　Crocker Mansion Estate LLC（克罗克大厦庄园有限责任公司）及 Taurus Fund（托罗斯基金）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Weihua Li（李伟华）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Rongrong Li（李蓉蓉）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Zhang Lin（张琳）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Mi Kyung Yang（杨美京）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Xue Wang（王雪）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Yaping Zhang（张亚平）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Zhixuan Li（李志轩）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Fanggui Zhu（朱方贵）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Yuechen Lan（蓝月晨）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Tian Shu Huang（黄天舒）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Shiying Li（李诗莹）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Jianxiao Chen（陈建晓）\n对抗程序案号 24-05272　Hayman Hong Kong Opportunities Onshore Fund LP（海曼香港机会境内基金有限合伙）\n对抗程序案号 24-05274　Kin Ming Je（谢建明）\n对抗程序案号 24-05274　Sin Ting Rong（荣善婷）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Lamp Capital LLC（兰普资本有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Golden Spring (New York) Ltd（金泉〔纽约〕有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Greenwich Land LLC（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　HCHK Technologies Inc（HCHK科技公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　HCHK Property Management Inc（HCHK物业管理公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Lexington Property and Staffing Inc（列克星敦物业及人力配置公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Leading Shine NY Ltd（领耀纽约有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　G Club International Limited（G俱乐部国际有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　G Club Operations LLC（G俱乐部运营有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　G Fashion（G时尚）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　G Fashion Media Group Inc（G时尚媒体集团公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Rule of Law Foundation III Inc（法治基金会III公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Rule of Law Society IV Inc.（法治协会IV公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　GFNY Inc（GFNY公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Anton Development Limited（安东发展有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Himalaya International Clearing Ltd（喜马拉雅国际清算有限公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　China Golden Spring Group (Hong Kong) Ltd（中国金泉集团〔香港〕有限公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　GF Italy LLC（GF意大利有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　ACA Capital Group Ltd（ACA资本集团有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Hamilton Investment Management Ltd（汉密尔顿投资管理有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC（汉密尔顿机会基金SPC）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Hamilton Capital Holding Ltd（汉密尔顿资本控股有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Himalaya Currency Clearing Pty Ltd（喜马拉雅货币清算私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Himalaya International Financial Group Ltd（喜马拉雅国际金融集团有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Himalaya International Reserves Ltd（喜马拉雅国际储备有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Hudson Diamond NY LLC（哈德逊钻石纽约有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　Saraca Media Group Inc（萨拉卡媒体集团公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05275　G Fashion International Limited（G时尚国际有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05276　ZYB Associates, LLC d/b/a Law Offices of Yongbing Zhang（ZYB联合有限责任公司，以张永兵律师事务所名义经营）\n对抗程序案号 24-05276　Yongbing Zhang（张永兵）\n对抗程序案号 24-05286　Clear Treasury Limited（清晰金库有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05287　Ascentiq Solutions Limited（阿森提克解决方案有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05288　5ivetech Limited（5ivetech有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05289　Aviva（英杰华）\n对抗程序案号 24-05290　Birchstone Capital AG（桦石资本股份公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05291　Callsign Ltd（呼号有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05292　Epic IT Ltd（史诗信息技术有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05293　Goodman Masson Ltd（古德曼·马森有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05294　Hays Specialist Recruitment Limited（瀚纳仕专业招聘有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05295　G Club Two（G俱乐部二）\n对抗程序案号 24-05296　Offensive Shield Ltd（进攻盾牌有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05297　Kionasoft LLC（基奥纳软件有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05298　HP Inc UK Limited（惠普公司英国有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05299　Zendesk Inc（Zendesk公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05300　IW Group Services UK Ltd（IW集团服务英国有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05301　Qun Ju（鞠群）\n对抗程序案号 24-05302　Whole Alpha Trading LLC（全阿尔法贸易有限责任公司，原名 Art Operation LLC〔艺术运营有限责任公司〕）\n对抗程序案号 24-05303　CyberApt Recruitment Ltd（赛博阿普特招聘有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05304　Teneo Ltd UK（特尼奥英国有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05305　Telehouse International Corporation（电信大厦国际公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05306　I.com Solutions Limited（I.com解决方案有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05307　Softcat PLC（软猫公共有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05308　The Golden Sealine Limited（金色海线有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05309　Haitong International Securities（海通国际证券）\n对抗程序案号 24-05310　Qiu Yue Shou（邱月寿）\n对抗程序案号 24-05316　Foley Hoag LLP（福利·霍格律师事务所）\n对抗程序案号 24-05317　Norris McLaughlin PA（诺里斯·麦克劳克林专业协会）\n对抗程序案号 25-05006　CRISP Insurance Advisors（CRISP保险顾问）\n对抗程序案号 25-05007　Hatstone Lawyers (BVI) Ltd（哈特斯通律师〔英属维尔京群岛〕有限公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 25-05008　CyGlass Inc（赛玻璃公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 25-05009　Strategic Political Management LLC（战略政治管理有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05010　David Consulting Inc（大卫咨询公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05011　Melbourne ROLF Incorporated（墨尔本ROL​​F公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05012　Bambee Inc（班比公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05014　JS Morlu LLC（JS莫鲁有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05015　Cesare Attolini NY LLC（切萨雷·阿托利尼纽约有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05016　Global Shuttle Pte Ltd（环球班车私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05017　Hee-Seup Shin（申熙燮）\n对抗程序案号 25-05020　Abu Dhabi Motors LLC（阿布扎比汽车有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05021　Savino Del Bene USA Inc（萨维诺·德尔·贝内美国公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05023　Mandelli USA Inc（曼德利美国公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05024　Prodome Management Consulting LLC（普罗多姆管理咨询有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05025　Taiwan Baudau Farm International Limited Company（台湾宝岛农场国际有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05026　CSQ\n项目开发顾问\n对抗程序案号 25-05027　Cyjax Limited（赛贾克斯有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05028　KDEBECHE Inc（KDEBECHE公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05029　Chan Chih Hsing（詹志兴）\n对抗程序案号 25-05030　O'Rourke (Midlands) Ltd（奥鲁克〔米德兰兹〕有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05031　Chetu Inc（切图公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05032　VP Bank (BVI) Ltd（VP银行〔英属维尔京群岛〕有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05034　Wenlong Wang（王文龙）\n对抗程序案号 25-05035　Xiang Zeng（曾翔）\n对抗程序案号 25-05036　17 State Owner LLC（17州所有人有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05037　BitGo Trust Company Inc（BitGo信托公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05038　S.A. Leather（S.A.皮革）\n对抗程序案号 25-05040　SDL Auctions Ltd（SDL拍卖有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05042　Passione Rossa LLC（罗萨激情有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05044　BMW of Freeport（弗里波特宝马）\n对抗程序案号 25-05046　Vision Building Energy Efficiency LLC d/b/a Bee（愿景建筑能源效率有限责任公司，以Bee名义经营）\n对抗程序案号 25-05047　FV Bank International Inc（FV国际银行公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05067　X49 FZ LLC（X49 FZ有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05068　Yay Design Inc（Yay设计公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05069　Ping Tang（唐平）\n对抗程序案号 25-05070　A.C.N. 676 287 157 PTY Ltd（A.C.N. 676 287 157私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05071　Lee Thian Guan John（李天官·约翰）\n对抗程序案号 25-05072　Dante Emanuel Leslie Delroy Brown（但丁·伊曼纽尔·莱斯利·德尔罗伊·布朗）\n对抗程序案号 25-05073　Azeem Bashir（阿泽姆·巴希尔）\n对抗程序案号 25-05074　Azalea M Garcia Corujo Esq (AGC Consulting)（阿泽莉娅·M·加西亚·科鲁霍律师〔AGC咨询〕）\n对抗程序案号 25-05076　Yuekun Ji（纪月坤）\n对抗程序案号 25-05077　Andrew David Law（安德鲁·大卫·劳）\n对抗程序案号 25-05078　Richard E Signorelli Attorney at Law（理查德·E·西尼奥雷利律师）\n对抗程序案号 25-05081　Syed Ehsan Haque（赛义德·埃桑·哈克）\n\n对抗程序案号 25-05082　Ali Albakri（阿里·阿尔巴克里）\n\n对抗程序案号 25-05087　Cedric DuPont Antiques（塞德里克·杜邦古董）\n对抗程序案号 25-05088　1stDibs.com（1stDibs.com）\n对抗程序案号 25-05089　Warp & Weft（经纬）\n对抗程序案号 25-05090　Westland Antiques Limited（韦斯特兰古董有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05091　Artistic Tile Inc（艺术瓷砖公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05092　Gold Medal Service LLC（金牌服务有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05093　Lobel Modern Inc（洛贝尔现代公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05094　NY Blinds and Shades Inc dba Innovation Shades（纽约百叶窗及遮阳帘公司，以创新遮阳帘名义经营）\n对抗程序案号 25-05095　Labarbiera Custom Homes LLC（拉巴别拉定制住宅有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05096　MonStar Air Heating & Cooling LLC（蒙斯塔空气供暖及制冷有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05097　Picture Perfect Glass & Mirror LLC（完美画面玻璃及镜子有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05098　Prevenitas Inc（普雷维尼塔斯公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05099　Marmiro Stones Inc（马尔米罗石材公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Chenyang Wang（王晨阳）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Danni Yu（俞丹妮）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Foteini Kantziou（福蒂尼·坎齐乌）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Haitao Guan（关海涛）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Jian Jiao（焦健）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Kai Zhao（赵凯）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Le Qiao（乔乐）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Lee Shin Jiet（李信杰）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Naseer Ahmad Khan（纳西尔·艾哈迈德·汗）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Niels Bom Olesen（尼尔斯·博姆·奥莱森）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Xianggang Li（李香港）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Xiaona Chen（陈晓娜）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Xu Zhang（张旭）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Ying Hu（胡莹）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Yuxiang Diao（刁宇翔）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Zelin Li（李泽林）\n对抗程序案号 25-05100　Zhuowei Xu（徐卓伟）\n对抗程序案号 25-05101　Armanino LLP（阿玛尼诺律师事务所）\n对抗程序案号 25-05102　Rizwan Javed（里兹万·贾韦德）\n对抗程序案号 25-05104　Astound Broadband（阿斯顿宽带）\n对抗程序案号 25-05105　Ace Decade Holdings Limited（王牌十年控股有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05105　Bravo Luck Limited（幸运喝彩有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05105　Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方利润有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05105　Guang Hong Limited（广鸿有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05105　H Reserve Management Ltd（H储备管理有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 25-05105　New Dynamic Development Limited（新动力发展有限公司）\n\n附件3-B\n\n（部分中止的撤销请求）\n\n对抗程序案号　被告\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05006　Amazon Web Services（亚马逊云服务）\n对抗程序案号 24-05007　Blueberry Builders（蓝莓建筑商）\n对抗程序案号 24-05011　E.L.J.M. Consulting LLC（E.L.J.M.咨询有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05016　Imperius International Trad Co Ltd（英佩里厄斯国际贸易有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05019　Mary Fashion SPA（玛丽时尚SPA公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05021　Bannon Strategic Advisors Inc（班农战略顾问公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05024　TT Resources 1 Pty Ltd（TT资源1私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05028　Yuqiang Qin（秦玉强）\n对抗程序案号 24-05028　Yunfu Jiang（江云富）\n对抗程序案号 24-05036　Mei Guo（郭梅）\n对抗程序案号 24-05044　Teris-Phoenix, LLC（泰瑞斯-菲尼克斯有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05054　Style Eyes Inc. d/b/a Ginger Finds（风格之眼公司，以Ginger Finds名义经营）\n对抗程序案号 24-05056　FFP (BVI) Limited（FFP〔英属维尔京群岛〕有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Amazon Inc（亚马逊公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Hing Chi Ngok（邢志岳）\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Alex Hadjicharalambous（亚历克斯·哈吉查拉兰布斯）\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Bernardo Enriquez（贝尔纳多·恩里克斯）\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Chunguang Han（韩春光）\n对抗程序案号 24-05057　Mei Guo\n对抗程序案号 24-05058　Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield（安森蓝十字蓝盾）\n对抗程序案号 24-05059　Federal Express（联邦快递）\n对抗程序案号 24-05060　Apple Inc（苹果公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05060　Alex Hadjicharalambous\n对抗程序案号 24-05060　Bernardo Enriquez\n对抗程序案号 24-05060　Chunguang Han\n对抗程序案号 24-05060　Mei Guo\n对抗程序案号 24-05065　A.Z. Bigiotterie\nS.A.S. DI Zanutto Gabriele & C.（扎努托·加布里埃莱及C.简易股份公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05069　B&H Foto & Electronics Corp（B&H摄影及电子公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05069　Hing Chi Ngok\n对抗程序案号 24-05069　Alex Hadjicharalambous\n对抗程序案号 24-05069　Bernardo Enriquez\n对抗程序案号 24-05069　Chunguang Han\n对抗程序案号 24-05075　Marcella Monica Falciani（马尔切拉·莫妮卡·法尔恰尼）\n对抗程序案号 24-05077　American Express（美国运通）\n对抗程序案号 24-05082　Ohtzar Shlomo Solomon Treasure LLC（奥扎尔·什洛莫·所罗门珍宝有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05085　Vandenloom LLC（范登卢姆有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05090　Swans Team Design Inc（天鹅团队设计公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05093　2 B Packing LLC（2B包装有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05098　Shing Seung Ankerite Engineering Ltd.（成盛安克里特工程有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05102　Ocorian Consulting Ltd（奥科里安咨询有限公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05105　N87 Inc（N87公司）\n\n对抗程序案号 24-05109　Moran Yacht Management, Inc（莫兰游艇管理公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05112　Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield（帝国蓝十字蓝盾）\n对抗程序案号 24-05115　Cloudflare, Inc.（云火公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05122　Indium Software Inc（铟软件公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05125　Rilievi Group S.R.L.（里列维集团有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05133　Beile Li（李贝乐）\n对抗程序案号 24-05134　V.X. Cerda & Associates PA（V.X.塞尔达及联合专业协会）\n对抗程序案号 24-05135　Liberty Jet Management Corp.（自由喷气机管理公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05141　Flat Rate Movers Ltd（统一费率搬家公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05145　Manhattan Motorcars, Inc（曼哈顿汽车公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05154　Kamel Debeche（卡迈勒·德贝什）\n对抗程序案号 24-05159　Gold Leaf Consulting Limited（金叶咨询有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05161　Mandelli USA, Inc.（曼德利美国公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05168　The Francis Firm PLLC（弗朗西斯律师事务所专业有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05172　Federal Corporation (Japan)（联邦公司〔日本〕）\n对抗程序案号 24-05174　SGB Packaging（SGB包装）\n对抗程序案号 24-05175　Lau Lai Chun Annie.（刘丽珍·安妮）\n对抗程序案号 24-05186　Berkeley Rowe Ltd.（伯克利·罗有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05188　Weddle Law PLLC（韦德尔律师事务所专业有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05189　TD Avenue (The Diamond Avenue)（TD大道〔钻石大道〕）\n对抗程序案号 24-05192　Forbes Hare（福布斯·黑尔）\n对抗程序案号 24-05199　Lawall & Mitchell LLC（劳沃尔及米切尔有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05199　Aaron Mitchell（亚伦·米切尔）\n对抗程序案号 24-05203　Oasis Tech Limited（绿洲科技有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05206　Hao Haidong（郝海东）\n对抗程序案号 24-05211　Putnam's Landscaping LLC（普特南园林绿化有限责任公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05223　G-Translators Pty Ltd（G-翻译公司私人有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05226　ACASS Canada Ltd.（ACASS加拿大有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05238　Qiang Guo（郭强）\n对抗程序案号 24-05248　Tut Co Limited（图特有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05263　BSA Strategic Fund I（BSA战略基金I）\n对抗程序案号 24-05263　Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）\n对抗程序案号 24-05271　Junjie Jiang（江俊杰）\n对抗程序案号 25-05052　N.A.R. Enterprises Inc dbs Luxury Cleaning NY（N.A.R.企业公司，以Luxury Cleaning NY名义经营）\n\n附件4\n\n（撤销诉讼中的证据开示程序）\n撤销诉讼中的证据开示程序\n\n1. 除非法院另有命令，本证据开示程序适用于所有撤销诉讼。\n\n2. 不迟于法院批准本证据开示程序后六十（60）日，受托人应建立一个电子证据开示资料库（“资料库”），该资料库由数据室（“数据室”）组成，每一数据室应载有受托人持有的、与下列事项相关的所有非特权[1]文件[2]：\n\n- a. Golden Spring (New York) Limited（金泉〔纽约〕有限公司）[3]；\n- b. Lamp Capital LLC（兰普资本有限责任公司）；\n- c. Leading Shine NY Ltd.（领耀纽约有限公司）；\n- d. Hudson Diamond NY LLC（哈德逊钻石纽约有限责任公司）；\n- e. Lexington Property and Staffing, Inc.（列克星敦物业及人力配置公司）；\n- f. HCHK Technologies, Inc.（HCHK科技公司）；\n- g. HCHK Property Management, Inc.（HCHK物业管理公司）；\n- h. Greenwich Land LLC（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）；\n- i. New Dynamic Development Limited（新动力发展有限公司）；\n- j. Taurus Fund LLC（托罗斯基金有限责任公司）；以及\n\nk. 受托人在撤销诉讼中提出的主张，即根据 Bankruptcy Code（《破产法典》）第 548 条和/或 N.Y. Debtor & Creditor Law（纽约州债务人与债权人法）提出的实际欺诈性转让主张，涉及债务人利用替身实体和代名人持有其资产所有权并处理其事务的“空壳游戏”。例如，见 Despins（德斯平斯）诉 Agora Lab, Inc.（阿戈拉实验室公司）案中的撤销诉讼起诉状 [Adv. Proc. No. 24-05005 Docket No. 1] ¶¶ 15-27, 32-34。\n\nl. 但是，撤销诉讼被告（Avoidance Defendants）；但受托人无需包括与下列撤销诉讼被告有关的文件：(i) 受托人仅就其提出了中止的撤销主张（Stayed Avoidance Claims）者；(ii) 截至法院批准本证据开示程序（Discovery Procedures）之日起六十（60）日之日，正在参与调解程序（Mediation Proceedings）者；或 (iii) 受托人的主张已通过和解或驳回得到解决者。\n\n1 如上文第 2 段所称“非特权”（“Non-privileged”），系指不受任何律师—当事人特权、工作成果或类似特权或保护约束，且由受托人拥有或控制的材料，包括但不限于与受托人自身的律师—当事人关系、受托人和/或其专业人员创作工作成果有关的材料，和/或根据《关于与 Rule 2004 传唤文件和信息相关的律师—当事人特权及工作成果保护控制权的同意裁定》（Consent Order Regarding Control of Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Protection Related to Rule 2004 Subpoenaed Documents and Information）[Main Case ECF No. 856]（可进一步修改，以下简称“特权裁定”（“Privileges Order”））和/或 Bankruptcy Code（《破产法典》）（包括但不限于作为债务人的继受人）所享有的材料。\n\n2 文件应以提交给受托人的形式上传至数据室（Data Rooms），包括任何可获得的元数据。如无法从该等元数据中显见，受托人将配合回应撤销诉讼被告就数据室中文件来源提出的任何询问。此外，应进行证据开示的任何撤销诉讼被告之请求，受托人将提供就数据室中文件向出具文件方发出的传票和文件请求副本。\n\n3 为免疑义，在出具与第 (a) 至 (j) 项所列实体有关的全部文件时，受托人应包括但不限于与通过该等实体进行的任何申请破产前或申请破产后转让有关的全部文件。\n\n3. 对于受托人主张享有特权、工作成果保护或任何类似特权或保护的文件，受托人应出具一份分类特权清单，按出具文件方和/或文件类别概括说明属于上述主题事项、但被从数据室中扣留的文件；但受托人无需在该清单中列入受托人的工作成果，或受托人、其律师及其其他顾问之间的通信。\n\n4. 对资料库（Depository）的访问仅限于代表撤销诉讼被告出庭，且 (a) 已个别证明遵守本证据开示程序[4]，以及 (b) 其律师事务所及适用客户已签署 P.O. Consents[5] 的律师。访问任何数据室时，访问律师应证明遵守上述要求，并列明该访问律师所访问数据室所代表的撤销诉讼被告。访问数据室中文件和信息的撤销诉讼被告，应被视为理解受托人在资料库中制作和提供文件受以下权利保留的约束：\n\na. 资料库中的绝大多数文件和信息，均由受托人在其调查过程中从第三方汇集；受托人对其中任何文件或信息的准确性、完整性和/或真实性绝不作出任何陈述或保证。\n\nb. 将文件或信息纳入资料库，不构成承认，亦不得据此主张该等文件或信息具有相关性或可采性，或该等文件真实；将文件或信息纳入资料库亦不构成对任何事实的承认。\n\nc. 将文件或信息纳入资料库，不构成亦不证明受托人以其自身身份或作为权益继受人可行使的律师—当事人特权、工作成果原则或任何其他特权或保护已被放弃。\n\nd. 受托人及参与证据开示的任何撤销诉讼被告，保留就资料库所含文件和信息提出的一切权利和异议。\n\ne. 保护令（Protective Order）适用于资料库中被指定为“保密”（“Confidential”）或“高度保密”（“Highly Confidential”）的所有文件和信息；对资料库的访问应严格限于已（单独或通过其律师事务所）同意受保护令约束的撤销诉讼被告律师。\n\n4 该证明应以受托人合理接受的形式提供。\n\n5 为获得对资料库的访问权限，P.O. Consents 必须同意保护令和 P.O Addendum。如上文第 3 段所称“适用客户”（“Applicable clients”），系指该律师为其访问数据室而出庭代理的撤销诉讼被告，以及该律师为其访问数据室的撤销诉讼被告。\n\nf. 通过任何撤销诉讼（Avoidance Action）中的证据开示程序取得文件或信息的律师，仅可将该等文件和信息与为其进行该等证据开示程序的客户分享。为免疑义，就一名客户通过证据开示程序取得文件或信息的律师，不得将该等文件或信息与任何其他个人或实体分享（包括该律师的其他客户，除非该等其他客户根据本证据开示程序独立享有访问该等文件或信息的权利）。\n\n5. 下列证据开示时间表（以下简称“证据开示时间表”（“Discovery Schedule”））适用于撤销诉讼，期限自证据开示开始之日（以下简称“证据开示开始日”（“Discovery Start Date”））起算：\n\na. 不迟于证据开示开始日后七日，受托人应允许撤销诉讼被告的律师访问包含与适用撤销诉讼中所主张请求有关文件的数据室，前提是该律师在其他方面符合访问资料库的资格。如受托人与撤销诉讼被告就撤销诉讼被告律师应可访问哪些数据室存在分歧，双方应会面协商以寻求解决该分歧；其后，可通过在相关撤销诉讼中提出动议将该分歧提交法院。\n\nb. 不迟于证据开示开始日后十四（14）日，各方应根据 Civil Rule 26(a)(1) 交换初步披露（“自动披露”（“Automatic Disclosures”））；但是，受托人作为其自动披露一部分出具文件的任何义务，可通过受托人准许撤销诉讼被告访问任何相关数据室而得到履行。\n\nc. 根据 Civil Rules 33, 34, and 36，并由 Bankruptcy Rules 7033, 7034, and 7036 适用于撤销诉讼的任何首轮书面询问、承认请求和/或文件出示请求（统称“书面证据开示请求”（“Written Discovery Requests”）），以及向第三方发出的首轮传票，均应不迟于证据开示开始日后九十（90）日送达。各方可在不违反本文件所列其他日期和期限的前提下，基于新发现的信息或诉讼进展，送达补充书面证据开示请求和传票。\n\nd. 包括证言录取证据开示、通过资料库进行的证据开示、依照书面证据开示请求进行的证据开示、例如根据 Bankruptcy Rules 7030, 7033, 7034, and 7036 及 Civil Rules 30, 33, 34, and 36 进行的证据开示，和/或根据 Bankruptcy Rule 9016 及 Civil Rule 45 进行的第三方证据开示在内的全部事实证据开示，应于证据开示开始日后三百（300）日完成。\n\ne. 认为需要专家证据开示的任何一方，应不迟于证据开示结束前六十（60）日向其他各方提供书面通知。收到该通知后，各方应就专家证据开示时间表进行协商，包括但不限于披露和证言录取期限；各方应将该时间表提交法院批准。如未能就规范专家证据开示的时间表达成协议，各方应申请状态会议以处理该事项。\n\nf. 上述期限可通过以下方式延长：(a) 由各方之间达成书面约定并在适用撤销诉讼中提交，最长延长九十（90）日；和/或 (b) 经任何一方提出动议，由法院作出命令延长。\n\n6. 尽管本文件有任何相反规定，任何希望向受托人送达书面证据开示请求的撤销诉讼被告，应在送达前：(i) 尽力从资料库获取所寻求的任何文件和信息；(ii) 从书面证据开示请求中排除任何可通过资料库获得的文件和信息请求；(iii) 与受托人会面协商资料库中文件和信息的可获得性以及拟议书面证据开示请求，并讨论可能就相同或类似主题事项进行证据开示的其他撤销诉讼被告；以及 (iv) 作出合理努力与其他撤销诉讼被告[6]协调，以避免重复或累积性证据开示，并在合理可能的情况下送达联合请求，包括例如送达共同书面询问。受托人保留对该等书面证据开示请求提出一切异议的权利，包括但不限于以该等请求整体上重复和/或对受托人造成过度负担为由提出异议。有关前述事项的任何争议，应由法院经适当动议解决。\n\n7. 除下列情形外，任何撤销诉讼均可进行证据开示（“符合证据开示资格的诉讼”（“Discovery-Eligible Actions”））：(a) 受托人的主张属于经修订程序（Amended Procedures）第 (e)(i) 项规定的中止的撤销主张；和/或 (b) 任何被告正就该诉讼中的主张与受托人参与调解程序。符合证据开示资格的诉讼中的任何一方，均可在该诉讼中提交证据开示开始日通知（Notice of Discovery Start Date）；该提交应将证据开示开始日确定为下列日期中较晚者：(x) 法院批准本证据开示程序的命令登记后至少七十（70）日的第一个工作日；或 (b) 提交证据开示开始日通知之日。\n\n8. 为免疑义，任何一方仅在使该等文件和信息受调解特权及保密性约束的情形下持有的文件和信息，不得进行证据开示。\n\n9. 将文件和信息纳入资料库，不构成亦不证明律师—当事人特权、工作成果原则或任何其他\n\n6 为免疑义，与其他撤销诉讼被告协调的义务，仅在其他撤销诉讼被告为承担该义务的撤销诉讼被告所知悉时适用，包括但不限于在受托人告知其他撤销诉讼被告正在寻求相同或类似证据开示之后。\n\n受托人无论以其自身身份或作为利益继受人所享有或可行使的任何特权或保护。存入资料库中的文件和信息，亦不构成或证明受托人就其对债务人财务事务的调查而放弃工作成果原则；受托人已明确保留该项保护。\n\n10. 在进行证言取证之前，任何撤销被告均应就任何证言取证的证人、主题及日程安排与受托人会商，以提高效率，包括但不限于限制证言取证的任何重复及其他负担。在该等会商期间，受托人可提议，撤销被告应在合理情况下考虑，将来自多项撤销诉讼的撤销被告纳入综合证言取证程序。任何一方均不得通知在任何撤销诉讼中于取证开始日期后75天之前进行证言取证。在通知任何证言取证时，发出通知的一方必须通过电子邮件向受托人及所有撤销被告的出庭律师，或就尚未有律师出庭的撤销被告通过美国邮政，向受托人及所有撤销被告至少提前二十一（21）天发出书面通知（“撤销证言取证通知”）。如多方希望对同一证人进行证言取证，受托人及所有撤销被告应合作安排日程，以避免重复的证言取证。应任何希望发出撤销证言取证通知的撤销被告之请求，受托人应提供撤销被告及其出庭律师的名单（包括可取得时的电子邮件地址）或邮寄地址。对于此前已在某项撤销诉讼中接受过证言取证的任何证人，任何在其参与取证期间收到有关该证人的撤销证言取证通知、且该证言取证发生于该被告取证开始日期后至少75天的撤销被告，均不得再行通知对该证人进行证言取证，除非事先获得受托人的书面同意或法院命令。如多个撤销被告参与证言取证，(i) 其应作出合理努力避免重复询问；以及 (ii) 必要时，各方应就根据《联邦民事诉讼规则》30(d)(1)分配给证言取证的时间作出合理调整进行会商。\n\n11. 为免生疑，《保护令》及《P.O. 附录》应适用于任何证言取证程序。\n\n12. 为免生疑，鉴于预计资料库中将包含被指定为“高度保密”的文件，对资料库的直接访问应限于有资格获得该等访问权限的各方律师。前述规定不妨碍该等律师在《保护令》及《P.O. 附录》允许的情况下，与其相应客户分享通过取证程序取得的文件和信息。\n\n13. 尽管本文件有任何相反规定，就部分中止的撤销请求而言，在法院进一步命令作出前，不得就任何中止事项进行取证。\n\n14. 鉴于本取证程序，各方无需依照《联邦民事诉讼规则》26(f)举行取证规划会议；但前提是，各方应在为依照本取证程序进行取证所必需的情况下，善意会商并合作，包括但不限于《联邦民事诉讼规则》26(f)(3)所列事项。\n\n15. 为免生疑，D. Conn. Local R. Civ. P. 37应适用于撤销诉讼中取证程序产生的任何争议。","key_entities":["Je","Himalaya","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Guo","Despins","CIPA","Paul Hastings","Miles Guo","HCHK","Saraca","Kin Ming Je","GETTR"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":465,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":856,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":2578,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3163,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":3465,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":15860,"status":"published","published_at":"2025-08-28 00:00:00","created_at":"2025-08-28","updated_at":"2026-08-23 21:55:49"}