{"id":"court_ctb_474_3","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":474,"sub_number":3,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2022-06-20","title":"Exhibit 3 Notice of Entry of Order","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"## **Exhibit 3**\n\n## Notice of Entry of Order\n\n*Guo v. Cheng* Eight Judicial District Court for Clark County, Nevada\n\n| | Case 22-50073
Doc 474-3 | Filed 06/20/22 | Entered 06/20/22 13:31:16 | Page 2 of 8
Electronically Filed
2/3/2020 3:33 PM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT | | | | | | |\n|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|\n| | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 1 | NEOJ | | | | | | | | | |\n| 2 | Marc J. Randazza (NV Bar No. 12265)
Ronald D. Green (NV Bar No. 7360) | | | | | | | | | |\n| 3 | Alex J. Shepard (NV Bar No. 13582)
RANDAZZA
LEGAL
GROUP,
PLLC | | | | | | | | | |\n| 4 | 2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109
Las Vegas, NV 89117 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 5 | Telephone: 702-420-2001 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 6 | ecf@randazza.com | | | | | | | | | |\n| 7
8 | Attorneys for Defendant
SHUIYAN CHENG | | | | | | | | | |\n| 9 | EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT | | | | | | | | | |\n| 10 | CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA | | | | | | | | | |\n| 11 | WENGUI GUO a/k/a MILES KWOK, | | Case No.
A-18-779172-C | | | | | | | |\n| 12 | Plaintiff, | | Dept. 32 | | | | | | | |\n| 13 | vs. | | NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER | | | | | | | |\n| 14 | SHUIYAN CHENG a/k/a HUIYAN CHANG; | | GRANTING DEFENDANT SHUIYAN | | | | | | | |\n| 15 | FANG YONG a/k/a MA KE, | | CHENG'S ANTI-SLAPP SPECIAL
MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER NRS | | | | | | | |\n| 16 | Defendants. | | 41.660 | | | | | | | |\n| 17 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 18 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 19 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 20 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 21
22 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 23 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 24 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 25 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 26 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 27 | | | | | | | | | | |\n| 28 | - 1 -
Notice of Entry of Order
A-18-779172-C | | | | | | | | | |\n\nCase Number: A-18-779172-C\n\n## **NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SHUIYAN CHENG'S ANTI-SLAPP SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER NRS 41.660**\n\nTO: PLAINTIFF\n\nPLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on January 30, 2020, the Court entered its Order granting Defendant Shuiyan Cheng's Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss Under NRS 41.660, attached as **Exhibit 1**.\n\nDated: February 3, 2020. Respectfully Submitted,\n\n/s/ Alex J. Shepard Marc J. Randazza (NV Bar No. 12265) Ronald D. Green (NV Bar No. 7360) Alex J. Shepard (NV Bar No. 13582) RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109 Las Vegas, NV 89117\n\n\n\n## **EXHIBIT 1**\n\nOrder Granting Defendant Shuiyan Cheng's Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss NRS 41.660\n\n| | Case 22-50073 | Doc 474-3 | Filed 06/20/22 | Entered 06/20/22 13:31:16 | Page 6 of 8
Electronically Filed
2/3/2020 10:14 AM
Steven D. Grierson
CLERK OF THE COURT | | | | |\n|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|----------------|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|--|--|\n| 1 | ORDR | | | | | | | | |\n| 2 | Marc j. Randazza (NV Bar No. 12265) | | | | | | | | |\n| 3 | Ronald D. Green (NV Bar No. 7360) | | | | | | | | |\n| 4 | Alex j. Shepard (NV Bar No. 13582)
RANDA77A LEGAL GROUP, PLLC | | | | | | | | |\n| 5 | 2764 lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109
las Vegas, NV 89117 | | | | | | | | |\n| 6 | Telephone: 702-420-2001 | | | | | | | | |\n| | ecf@randazza.com | | | | | | | | |\n| | 7
Attorneys for Defendant | | | | | | | | |\n| 8 | Shuiyan Cheng | | | | | | | | |\n| 9 | EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT | | | | | | | | |\n| 10 | CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA | | | | | | | | |\n| 11 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 12 | WENGU! GUO a/k/a MILES KWOK, | | | Case No. ٨-18-779172-ا | | | | | |\n| 13 | | Plaintiff, | | Dept. 32 | | | | | |\n| 14 | vs. | | | ORDER | | | | | |\n| 15 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 16 | SHUIYAN CHENG a/k/a HUIYAN CHANG;
FANGYONGa/k/a MA KE, | | | | | | | | |\n| 17 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 1 8 | | Defendants. | | | | | | | |\n| 19 | | | | | | | | | |\n| 20 | ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SHUIYAN CHENG'S | | | | | | | | |\n| 21 | ANTI-SLAPP SPECIAL MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER NRS 41.660 | | | | | | | | |\n| 22 | This matter, having come before the Court on Defendant Shuiyan Cheng's | | | | | | | | |\n| 23 | Anti-SIAPP Special Motion to Dismiss Under NRS 41
.660, and It appearing, upon | | | | | | | | |\n| 24 | argument of counsel and for good cause shown, the motion is granted: | | | | | | | | |\n| 25 | NRS 41 .635 et seg., Nevada's Anti-SIAPP statute, creates a procedure for | | | | | | | | |\n| 26 | early dismissal of cases which are targeted at speech and conduct that fall under | | | | | | | | |\n| 27 | | | | | | | | | |\n| | | | | | | | | | |\n| | | | 1
Order | | | | | | |\n| | | | | | | | | | |\n\n1 specified cafegories and that اack m!n!ma! merit, the statute creates a two-step analysis. First, the moving party must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the plaintiff's causes of action are based upon statements that fall into at least one category set out in NRS 41 .637 and that are made in good faith, meaning they are truthful or were made without knowledge of falsity. If the moving party makes such a showing, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff to make a prima facie showing that It has a probability of prevailing on its claims, 2 3 4 5 6 7\n\nthe Court finds Defendant Cheng satisfied his burden under the first prong of this analysis. His statements on which Plaintiff's claims are based are all protected under NRS 41 .637(4). Mr. Cheng also showed by a preponderance of the evidence that he made his statements without knowledge they were false, 8 9 10 1 1\n\nthe Court also finds Plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing that he has a probability of prevailing on his claims. Plaintiff is a public figure, being heavily reported on, with multiple news sources in the record referring to him and controversies surrounding him. 12 13 14 15\n\nAs a public figure. Plaintiff must prove by clear and convincing evidence that Defendant's statements were made with actual malice, that Is with knowing falsity or a reckless disregard for the truth. New York Times Co. V. Sullivan, 376 u.s. 254(1964). 16 17 18 19\n\n20 Mr. Cheng's statements were consistent with statements about Plaintiff in well-respected publications such as. Inter alia, Deutsche Welle, the New York times, and Forbes. Mr. Cheng demonstrated numerous publications in the mainstream press, from multiple countries, were the sources of his basis for the statements he made. Mr. Cheng had no reason to doubt the veracity of those sources, and Mr. Cheng provided uncontroverted evidence that he did not know the statements to be false. His reliance upon mainstream media for his 21 22 23 24 25 26 27\n\ninformaron makes a finding of recklessness under applicable standards impossible. 1 2\n\n3 These statements are thus protected under the First Amendment.\n\nAccordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Shulyan Cheng's Anti-SLAPP Special Motion to Dismiss Under NRS 41.600 is hereby GRANTED. 4 5\n\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of Plaintiff Wengui Guo's claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 6 7\n\nIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as the prevailing party on a special motion to dismiss he filed, Mr. Cheng is entitled to recover his costs and reasonable attorneys' fees under NRS 41.670(1 )(a), and may receive an award of up to \\$10,000 in damages under NRS 41.670(1 )(b). Mr. Cheng may file a motion for fees, costs, and damages no later than 21 days following notice of entry of this Order. 8 9 10 11 12\n\n13 ? JaHL-14 DATED this -٠ day of 2020. 15 16 17 18 DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Vv\\ 19 Submitted by: 20 /s/Marc j. Randaza 21 Marc j. Randazza (NV Bar No. 12265) Ronald D. Green (NV Bar No. 7360) Alex j. Shepard (NV Bar No. 13582) RANDA72A LEGAL GROUP, PllC 2764 lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109 las Vegas, Nevada 89117 ecf@randazza.com 22 23 24 25 26 Counsel for Defendant 27 Shuiyan Cheng 3 Order","body_zh":"证据 3\n裁定录入通知\n\nGuo v. Cheng（郭诉成案） 内华达州克拉克县第八司法区法院\n\nCase 22-50073\nDoc 474-3 Filed 06/20/22 Entered 06/20/22 13:31:16 Page 2 of 8\n电子归档\n2/3/2020 3:33 PM\nSteven D. Grierson\n法院书记官\n\n1 NEOJ\n2 Marc J. Randazza（内华达州律师执业号 12265）\nRonald D. Green（内华达州律师执业号 7360）\n3 Alex J. Shepard（内华达州律师执业号 13582）\nRANDAZZA\nLEGAL\nGROUP,\nPLLC（兰达扎法律集团有限责任专业合伙）\n4 2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109\nLas Vegas, NV 89117\n5 电话：702-420-2001\n6 ecf@randazza.com\n\n8 被告 SHUIYAN CHENG（成水炎）之代理律师\n9 内华达州克拉克县\n10 第八司法区法院\n11 WENGUI GUO（郭文贵）又名 MILES KWOK， 案号：A-18-779172-C\n12 原告， 第 32 法庭\n13 诉 准予被告 SHUIYAN CHENG（成水炎）\n14 SHUIYAN CHENG（成水炎）又名 HUIYAN CHANG； 依据《内华达州修订法规》（NRS）第 41.660 条\n15 FANG YONG（房勇）又名 MA KE， 提出的反反公众参与策略（Anti-SLAPP）\n16 被告。 特别驳回动议之裁定录入通知\n\n28 - 1 -\n裁定录入通知\nA-18-779172-C\n\n案件编号：A-18-779172-C\n准予被告 SHUIYAN CHENG 依据 NRS 41.660 提出的反 SLAPP 特别驳回动议之裁定录入通知\n\n致：原告\n\n请注意，本院已于 2020 年 1 月 30 日录入其准予被告 Shuiyan Cheng 依据 NRS 41.660 提出的反 SLAPP 特别驳回动议的裁定，见附录证据 1。\n\n日期：2020 年 2 月 3 日。 谨此提交，\n\n/签名/ Alex J. Shepard Marc J. Randazza（内华达州律师执业号 12265） Ronald D. Green（内华达州律师执业号 7360） Alex J. Shepard（内华达州律师执业号 13582） RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109 Las Vegas, NV 89117\n证据 1\n\n准予被告 Shuiyan Cheng 依据 NRS 41.660 提出的反 SLAPP 特别驳回动议之裁定\n\nCase 22-50073 Doc 474-3 Filed 06/20/22 Entered 06/20/22 13:31:16 Page 6 of 8\n电子归档\n2/3/2020 10:14 AM\nSteven D. Grierson\n法院书记官\n\n1 ORDR\n2 Marc J. Randazza（内华达州律师执业号 12265）\n3 Ronald D. Green（内华达州律师执业号 7360）\n4 Alex J. Shepard（内华达州律师执业号 13582）\nRANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC\n5 2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109\nLas Vegas, NV 89117\n6 电话：702-420-2001\necf@randazza.com\n\n被告代理律师\n8 Shuiyan Cheng\n9 内华达州克拉克县\n10 第八司法区法院\n\n12 WENGUI GUO 又名 MILES KWOK， 案号：A-18-779172-C\n13 原告， 第 32 法庭\n14 诉 裁定\n\n16 SHUIYAN CHENG 又名 HUIYAN CHANG；\nFANG YONG 又名 MA KE，\n\n18 被告。\n\n20 准予被告 SHUIYAN CHENG\n21 依据 NRS 41.660 提出的反 SLAPP 特别驳回动议之裁定\n22 本案系基于被告 Shuiyan Cheng 依据 NRS 41.660 提出的反 SLAPP 特别驳回动议提交本院审理，经\n23 听取律师辩论且有充分理由表明，该动议应予准许：\n24\n25 NRS 41.635 及以下各条（内华达州反 SLAPP 法规）设立了一套程序，旨在\n26 提早驳回针对落入特定类别且缺乏起码实体依据的言论及行为提起的案件。该法规设定了双阶分析框架。首先，动议方必须以优势证据证明原告的诉讼理由是基于落入 NRS 41.637 所列至少一个类别且系出于善意作出的陈述，即陈述属实或在不知其虚假的情况下作出。若动议方作出该等证明，举证责任随后转移至原告，原告须初步证明其主张有胜诉的可能性。2 3 4 5 6 7\n\n本院认定被告 Cheng 已完成该分析框架第一阶段的举证责任。原告主张所依据的其全部陈述均受 NRS 41.637(4) 保护。Cheng 先生还以优势证据证明其在发表陈述时并不知道陈述为虚假。8 9 10 11\n\n本院亦认定原告未能初步证明其主张有胜诉的可能性。原告为公众人物，受到大量报道，记录中有多家新闻来源提及其本人及围绕其的争议。12 13 14 15\n\n作为公众人物，原告必须以高度盖然性的明确证据（clear and convincing evidence）证明被告的陈述是出于实际恶意（actual malice）作出的，即明知其虚假或罔顾事实真相。New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964)（《纽约时报》公司诉沙利文案）。16 17 18 19\n\n20 Cheng 先生的陈述与 Deutsche Welle（德国之声）、the New York Times（纽约时报）以及 Forbes（福布斯）等广受尊敬的出版物中关于原告的陈述相一致。Cheng 先生证明了来自多个国家的主流媒体的大量出版物是他发表陈述的依据来源。Cheng 先生没有理由怀疑这些来源的真实性，且 Cheng 先生提供了不可反驳的证据证明他并不知道这些陈述是不真实的。他依赖主流媒体获取21 22 23 24 25 26 27\n\n信息使得在适用标准下认定其构成轻率罔顾成为不可能。1 2\n\n3 因此，这些陈述受到《第一宪法修正案》（First Amendment）保护。\n\n据此，特此裁定准予被告 Shuiyan Cheng 依据 NRS 41.660 提出的反 SLAPP 特别驳回动议。4 5\n\n进一步裁定原告 Wengui Guo 的所有主张均在此予以驳回，且不得再次起诉（dismissed with prejudice）。6 7\n\n进一步裁定，作为其所提交特别驳回动议的胜诉方，Cheng 先生有权依据 NRS 41.670(1)(a) 追索其诉讼费用和合理的律师费，并可依据 NRS 41.670(1)(b) 获得最高 10,000 美元的损害赔偿金。Cheng 先生可在本裁定录入通知发出后不迟于 21 天内提交关于律师费、诉讼费用及损害赔偿金的动议。8 9 10 11 12\n\n13 2020 年 1 月 30 日签署。15 16 17 18 地方法院法官 19 谨此提交：20 /签名/ Marc J. Randazza 21 Marc J. Randazza（内华达州律师执业号 12265） Ronald D. Green（内华达州律师执业号 7360） Alex J. Shepard（内华达州律师执业号 13582） RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 2764 Lake Sahara Drive, Suite 109 Las Vegas, Nevada 89117 ecf@randazza.com 22 23 24 25 26 被告代理律师 27 Shuiyan Cheng 3 裁定","key_entities":["Guo","Kwok"],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":1706,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-06-20 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-06-20","updated_at":"2026-08-23 13:38:17"}