{"id":"court_ctb_50_3","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":50,"sub_number":3,"doc_type":"RESPONSE","filed_date":"2022-02-28","title":"EXHIBIT 18 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"Case 22-50073 Doc 50-3 Filed 02/28/22 Entered 02/28/22 21:19:53 Page 1 of 31\n\n# **EXHIBIT 18**\n\n## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK\n\nPACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.,\n\nPlaintiff,\n\nvs.\n\nIndex No. 652077/2017\n\nHon. Barry Ostrager\n\nPart 61\n\nKWOK HO WAN, et al.,\n\nDefendants.\n\n## **DEFENDANT KWOK'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.'S THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES**\n\nDefendant Kwok Ho Wan (\"Defendant Kwok\"), based on present information and belief, and pursuant to the requirements of the CPLR, the Rules of the Commercial Division, and in accordance with this Court's October 15, 2020 Decision and Order (Dkt. No. 630) (\"Order\"), hereby provides the following responses and objections to Plaintiff Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. 's Third Set oflnterrogatories, dated November 6, 2020\n\n(\"Interrogatories\"):\n\n# **GENERAL OBJECTIONS**\n\n1. Defendant Kwok objects to these Interrogatories as they violate Commercial Division Rule 11-a( a) which limits interrogatories to \"25 in number, including subparts, unless another limit is specified in the preliminary conference order.\"\n\n2. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for documents, information, or other discovery that is not limited in time to the relevant period at issue.\n\n3. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for documents, information, or other discovery that is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.\n\n4. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for documents, information, or other discovery that is beyond the scope permitted under CPLR § 5229 and/or other applicable laws or rules of the court.\n\n5. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for documents, information, or other discovery that is protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege, immunity, or protection.\n\n6. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for documents, information, or other discovery in the possession of third parties not under his control or within the scope of his authority to produce.\n\n7. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for documents to which Plaintiff should already have access.\n\n8. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it is vague or ambiguous.\n\n9. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it is overly broad or unduly burdensome.\n\n10. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it is, or assumes, a legal conclusion.\n\n11. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it exceeds, contradicts, and/or varies in any way from any agreement reached by counsel for all parties.\n\n2\n\n12. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative.\n\n13. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it is intended to harass, oppress or unduly burden Defendant Kwok.\n\n14. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for speculation, conjecture, or legal conclusions.\n\n15. Defendant Kwok objects to each Interrogatory to the extent that it calls for information presently unknown to Defendant Kwok. The responses herein are based upon Defendant Kwok's present recollection, knowledge, information and belief. Defendant Kwok reserves the right to supplement, amend, correct or clarify his responses.\n\n16. The omission of any objection from this document does not constitute a waiver of that objection.\n\n#### **SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS**\n\nSubject to and without waiving the foregoing General Objections, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference, Defendant Kwok responds and objects to each specified Definition and Interrogatory as follows:\n\n## **DEFINITION 2 (\"Interest\")**\n\nThe term \"Interest\" means any direct or indirect interest, whether partial, whole, potential, or contingent, including without limitation legal ownership, beneficial ownership, right to control, ownership of any or all of the shares of an incorporated entity, membership or interest in a limited liability company or partnership, or access to funds or assets.\n\n## **Response to Definition 2**\n\nDefendant Kwok objects to the definition of \"Interest\" as it is overbroad, unduly burdensome, exceeds the scope of CPLR §5229 disclosure, and exceeds the scope of this Court's Order to the extent that it includes \"potential\" interest. Defendant Kwok further objects to the definition of \"Interest\" as vague and ambiguous to the extent that it includes \"access to funds or assets.\" Defendant Kwok also objects to the definition of \"Interest\" to the extent that it calls for speculation, conjecture, or legal conclusions.\n\n## **DEFINITION 3 (\"Asset\")**\n\nThe term \"Asset\" means any asset or property whatsoever, whether tangible or intangible, including without limitation cash, bank accounts, brokerage accounts, real property, land, corporate shares, membership or interest in a limited liability company or partnership, stocks, shares, bonds, investments, investment vehicles, actual or potential judgments, liens, easements, attachments, leases, intellectual property including without limitation patents and trademarks, automobiles, airplanes, helicopters, sea vessels, vehicles, artwork, collectibles, clothing, jewelry, cryptocurrency, crypto-wallets, safe deposit boxes, chattel, precious stones or securities, commodities, receivables, convertible loans, and interests derived from financial instruments, whether directly or indirectly held.\n\n## **Response to Definition 3**\n\nDefendant Kwok objects to the definition of \"Asset\" as it is overbroad, unduly\n\nburdensome, exceeds the scope of CPLR §5229 disclosure, and exceeds the scope of this Court's\n\nOrder to the extent that it includes \"intangible\" assets. Defendant Kwok further objects to the\n\ndefinition of \"Asset\" as vague and ambiguous to the extent that it includes \"intangible\" assets.\n\n## **DEFINITION 4 (\"Family Member\")**\n\nThe term \"Family Member\" includes Your parents, siblings, aunts and uncles, spouse(s), firstand second-cousins, children, grandchildren, nephews, and nieces.\n\n## **Response to Definition 4**\n\nDefendant Kwok objects to the definition of \"Family Member\" as it is overbroad, unduly\n\nburdensome, exceeds the scope of CPLR §5229 disclosure, and exceeds the scope of this Court's\n\nOrder which authorizes discovery on the Sherry-Netherland residence, the Lady May yacht and \"other assets that Mr. Kwok may own, whether directly or indirectly.\" Defendant Kwok further objects to the definition of \"Family Member\" to the extent it seeks to bring into its definition individual third parties that he does not control. Mr. Kwok's responses will be limited to those assets \"that Mr. Kwok may own, whether directly or indirectly.\"\n\n#### **INSTRUCTION 7 (\"Time Period\")**\n\nUnless otherwise specified, the applicable time period for each Interrogatory is January 1, 2008, up to and including the date of production (the \"Time Period\").\n\n#### **Response to Instruction 7**\n\nDefendant Kwok objects to the \"Time Period\" set out in Instruction 7 as it is overbroad, unduly burdensome, exceeds the scope of CPLR §5229 disclosure, and exceeds the scope of this Court's Order which authorizes discovery on the Sherry-Netherland residence, the Lady May yacht and \"other assets that Mr. Kwok may own, whether directly or indirectly.\" The relevant Time Period for purposes of this disclosure is October 15, 2020 (the date of the CPLR §5229 proceedings on the record) through the present date in order to identify any assets which Mr. Kwok \"may own, whether directly or indirectly.\"\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 1<sup>1</sup>**\n\nIdentify all Persons ( excluding natural persons) in which You have an Interest or have had an Interest since January 1, 2015.\n\n<sup>1</sup>Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 4563310029216029 and 4563310029216839.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds: I\n\nam the legal owner of the issued shares of Genever Holdings Corporation. Genever Holdings\n\nCorporation is the sole shareholder of Genever Holdings, LLC.\n\n# **INTERROGATORY NO. 2<sup>2</sup>**\n\nFor all Persons identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1, Identify:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that Person.\n- b. Any other Persons that also have an Interest in that Person.\n- c. The value of Your Interest in that Person, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that Person.\n- d. Any members of that Person's board of directors, board of managers, board of members, board of advisers, or management.\n- e. The state or jurisdiction of organization or incorporation of that Person.\n- f. The date of incorporation or organization of that Person.\n- g. The description, value, and location of any and all Assets that have a value greater than \\$10,000 that are held (directly or indirectly) by that Person.\n- h. Any and all bank, brokerage, investment, cryptocurrency, or other accounts indirectly or directly held or controlled by that Person (including without limitation the bank or brokerage name, name on the account, authorized signatories, branch location, account number, and balance).\n- 1. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that Person.\n- J. Any and all Persons in which that Person has any Interest ( and for all such Persons, Identify the information requested in subparts (a)-(i)).\n- k. For any Person in which You no longer have any Interest, (i) the date on which (a) You sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such\n\n<sup>2</sup> Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 4563310029216029 and 4563310029216839.\n\nsale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in that Person.\n\n1. Any and all trust agreements, pledges, liens, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind that have been placed on or relate to that Person.\n\n## **Response to Interrogatory No. 2:**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nGenever Holdings Corporation:\n\n- a. Daniel Podhaskie, Yanping Wang, and I have knowledge related to this entity. We are each represented by counsel.\n- b. None.\n- c. Interest is nil as the only asset is Genver Holdings, LLC which has liabilities greater than its assets.\n- d. I am the sole shareholder.\n- e. British Virgin Islands.\n- f. February 13, 2015.\n- g. None. Noting that it owns 100% of the shares of Genever Holdings, LLC.\n- h. None.\n- 1. Intertrust Corporate Services, Ritter House, Tortola.\n- J. Owns 100% of the shares of Genever Holdings, LLC.\n- k. None.\n- 1. A trust agreement exists between and//or among Defendant Kwok, Genever Holdings Corporation; Genever Holdings, LLC and Bravo Luck Limited.\n\nGenever Holdings, LLC:\n\n- a. Daniel Podhaskie, Yan ping Wang, and I have knowledge related to this entity. We are each represented by counsel.\n- b. None.\n- c. Interest is nil as the only asset is Genever Holdings, LLC which has liabilities greater than its assets.\n- d. I am the sole shareholder.\n- e. New York.\n- f. February 13, 2015\n- g. None. Noting that it is the leaseholder related to the property which comprises the previously-identified Sherry Netherlands coop shares.\n- h. None.\n- 1. Daniel Podhaskie, Y anping Wang, and I.\n- J. Owns 100% of the shares of Genever Holdings, LLC.\n- k. None.\n- 1. A trust agreement exists between and//or among Defendant Kwok, Genever Holdings Corporation; Genever Holdings, LLC and Bravo Luck Limited.\n\nIdentify all Persons (excluding natural persons) in which any Family Member has an Interest or has had an Interest since January 1, 2015.\n\n## **Response to Interrogatory No. 3**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok will not\n\nrespond to this Interrogatory.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 4<sup>4</sup>**\n\nFor all Persons identified in response to Interrogatory No. 3, Identify:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that Person.\n- b. Any other Persons that also have an Interest in that Person.\n- c. The value of the Family Member's Interest in that Person, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that Person.\n- d. Any members of that Person's board of directors, board of managers, board of members, board of advisers, or management.\n- e. The state or jurisdiction of organization or incorporation of that Person.\n- f. The date of incorporation or organization of that Person.\n- g. The description, value, and location of any and all Assets that have a value greater than \\$10,000 that are held (directly or indirectly) by that Person.\n- h. Any and all bank, brokerage, investment, cryptocurrency, or other accounts indirectly or directly held or controlled by that Person (including without limitation the bank or brokerage name, name on the account, authorized signatories, branch location, account number, and balance).\n- 1. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that Person.\n- J. Any and all Persons in which that Person has any Interest ( and for all such Persons, Identify the information requested in subparts (a)-(i)).\n\n<sup>3</sup> Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 4563310029216029 and 4563310029216839. 4 Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also\n\nincludes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 4563310029216029 and 4563310029216839.\n\n- k. For any Person in which the Family Member no longer has any Interest, (i) the date on which (a) the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b )circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in that Person.\n- 1. Any and all trust agreements, pledges, liens, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind that have been placed on or relate to that Person.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok will not\n\nrespond to this Interrogatory.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 5**\n\nIdentify any Assets that have a value greater than \\$10,000 in which You have an Interest or have had an Interest since January 1, 2015.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 5**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI am the legal owner of the issued shares of Gen ever Holdings Corporation. Genever\n\nHoldings Corporation is the sole shareholder of Genever Holdings, LLC, its only asset. The\n\nliabilities of Genever Holdings, LLC exceed its assets as set forth in Bankruptcy filings for\n\nGenever Holdings, LLC.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 6**\n\nFor all Assets identifieLl in rc:spon:sc to Interrogatory No. 5, Identify:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that Asset.\n-\n- c. The value of Your Interest in that Asset, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that Asset.\n- d. The state or jurisdiction in which that Asset is located.\n- e. The date on which You acquired your Interest in that Asset.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that Asset.\n- g. For any Asset in which You no longer have any Interest, (i) the date on which (a) You sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in that Asset.\n- h. Any and all trust agreements, pledges, liens, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind that have been placed on or relate to that Asset.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nSee Response to Interrogatory No. 2 above.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 7**\n\nIdentify any Assets that have a value greater than \\$50,000 in which any Family Member has an Interest or has had an Interest since January 1, 2015.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 7**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok will not\n\nrespond to this Interrogatory.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 8**\n\nFor all Assets identified in response to Interrogatory No. 7, Identify:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that Asset.\n- b. Any other Persons that also have an Interest in that Asset.\n- c. The value of the Family Member's Interest in the Asset, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that Asset.\n- d. The state or jurisdiction in which that Asset is located.\n- e. The date on which a Family Member acquired an Interest in that Asset.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that Asset.\n- g. For any Asset in which any Family Member no longer has any Interest, (i) the date on which (a) the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person ( a) to which the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the ( a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in that Asset.\n- h. Any and all trust agreements, pledges, liens, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind that have been placed on or relate to that Asset.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok will not\n\nrespond to this Interrogatory.\n\n# **INTERROGATORY NO. 95**\n\nIdentify all bank, brokerage, investment, cryptocurrency, or other accounts in which You have an Interest or have had an Interest since January 1, 2015.\n\n## **Response to Interrogatory No. 9**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nNone.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 10<sup>6</sup>**\n\nFor all accounts identified in response to Interrogatory No. 9, Identify:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that account.\n- b. The bank or brokerage name.\n- c. The name on that account.\n\n<sup>5</sup> Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 4563310029216029 and 4563310029216839.\n\n<sup>6</sup>Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 45633100292 I 6029 and 4563310029216839.\n\n- d. The authorized signatories on that account.\n- e. The branch location.\n- f. The account number.\n- g. The account balance.\n- h. Any other Persons that also have an Interest in that account.\n- 1. The value of Your Interest in that account, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that account.\n- J. The date on which You acquired Your Interest in that account.\n- k. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that account.\n- 1. For any account in which You no longer have any Interest, (i) the date on which (a) You sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person ( a) to which You sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in that account.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nNot Applicable.\n\n## **INTERROGATORYN0.11 <sup>7</sup>**\n\nIdentify all bank, brokerage, investment, cryptocurrency, or other accounts in which a Family Member has an Interest or has had an Interest since January 1, 2015.\n\n## **Response to Interrogatory No. 11**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok will not\n\nrespond to this Interrogatory.\n\n<sup>7</sup>Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 4563310029216029 and 4563310029216839.\n\nFor all accounts identified in response to Interrogatory No. 11, Identify:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that account.\n- b. The bank or brokerage name.\n- c. The name on the account.\n- d. The authorized signatories on that account.\n- e. The branch location.\n- f. The account number.\n- g. The account balance.\n- h. Any other Persons that also have an Interest in that account.\n- 1. The value of any Family Member's Interest in that account, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that account.\n- J. The date on which the Family Member acquired their Interest in that account.\n- k. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that account.\n- 1. For any account in which the Family Member no longer has any Interest, (i) the date on which (a) the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the ( a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in that account.\n- m. Any and all trust agreements, pledges, liens, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind that have been placed on or relate to that account.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 12**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok will not\n\nrespond to this Interrogatory.\n\n<sup>8</sup> Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 45633 l 0029216029 and 45633 l 0029216839.\n\nIdentify the custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to your personal finances, Assets, and Interests in any Person.\n\n## **Response to Interrogatory No. 13**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nDaniel Podhaskie, Yanping Wang, and I are the custodians of the responsive formation and\n\ncorporate documents, which are located at 162 E. 64th Street, New York, New York 10065.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 14**\n\nIdentify (including without limitation the type, value, source, and amount) any gifts, benefits, payments, income, or loans You have received since January **1,** 2015.\n\n## **Response to Interrogatory No. 14**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nThis Interrogatory is unclear to the extent that it includes \"benefits\" within its scope but\n\nwith respect to other gifts, payments, income or loans received for the relevant time period, there\n\nare none.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 15**\n\nIdentify (including without limitation the type, value, source, and amount) any gifts, benefits, payments, income, or loans You have made or given since January **1,** 2015.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 15**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nThis Interrogatory is unclear to the extent that it includes \"benefits\" within its scope but with\n\nrespect to other gifts, payments, income or loans made or given for the relevant time period,\n\nthere are none.\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the \"personal JPMorgan Chase account in New York,\" referred to at paragraph 35 of the February 5, 2016 Affidavit of Kwok Ho Wan in Support of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint in *Ace Decade Holdings Ltd. v. UBS AG,* Index No. 653316/2015 (N.Y. Sup. Ct.):\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that account.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in that account.\n- c. The bank or brokerage name.\n- d. The name on that account.\n- e. The authorized signatories on that account.\n- f. The branch location.\n- g. The account number.\n- h. The account balance.\n- i. The value of Your Interest in that account, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that account.\n- J. The date on which You acquired your Interest in that account.\n- k. The date on which any Family Member acquired an Interest in that account.\n- 1. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that account.\n- m. If You or any Family Member no longer have any Interest in the account, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person ( a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in the account.\n- n. Any and all trust agreements, pledges, liens, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind that have been placed on or relate to that account.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 16**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nTo my best recollection, this account was closed in or about March or April 2017, and certainly\n\nwell before October 15, 2020.\n\n# **INTERROGATORY NO.** 17\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the bank account at UBS AG Hong Kong Branch with account number 371236, referenced on page 16 of Exhibit B to Eastern Profit Corporation Limited's November 22, 2019 Response to Letter Motion in *Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US LLC,* C.A. No. 18- cv-2185 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y.) (ECF No. 203-2):\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about that account.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in that account.\n- c. The bank or brokerage name.\n- d. The name on that account.\n- e. The authorized signatories on that account.\n- f. The branch location.\n- g. The account number.\n- h. The account balance.\n- 1. The value of Your Interest in that account, and the value of any Interests held by any other Persons in that account.\n- J. The date on which You acquired your Interest in that account.\n- k. The date on which any Family Member acquired an Interest in that account.\n- 1. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to that account.\n- m. If You or any Family Member no longer have any Interest in the account, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in the account.\n- n. Any and all trust agreements, pledges, liens, encumbrances, or interferences of\n\nany kind that have been placed on or relate to that account.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 17**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nWhile the defendant in that action attempted to bring me in to that case, those claims were summarily dismissed. I am not a party to the above-referenced action. The document referred to above specifically states that the identified account is not held by me. It also bears noting that the document appears to be a document from the High Court of Hong Kong which is under the direct control of the Chinese Communist Party.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 18**\n\nWith respect to the February 23, 2015 letter from UBS on your behalf to the Sherry Netherland (which was filed in this litigation at docket number 256 bearing the Bates numbers SN 0056), Identify:\n\n- a. The \"personal investment company\" referred to at SN 0056.\n- b. The account(s) associated with the \"funds involved in this banking relationship\" referred to at SN 0056.\n- c. For the account(s) identified in subpart (b ), the information requested in Interrogatory 16 subparts ( a)-(n).\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 18**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI cannot answer this Interrogatory without more information besides a vague reference by a\n\nthird-party to an unidentified account. I can say with certainty that I have no personal accounts\n\nwith UBS as of October 15, 2020, the relevant period for these Interrogatories.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 19**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the Lady May:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. Its current location, including without limitation the address, state, and jurisdiction.\n- f. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- g. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\na. Hong Kong International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC and Mei Guo.\n\nBoth are represented by counsel.\n\n- b. Hong Kong International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC and Mei Guo.\n- c. Responsive information is not within my possession, custody, and/or control.\n- d. Responsive information is not within my possession, custody, and/or control.\n- e. Responsive information is not within my possession, custody, and/or control.\n- f. I do not have an interest. Beyond that, responsive information is not within my possession, custody, and/or control, except to note that I am not aware of any seizure, sale, transfer or disposition.\n- g. Responsive information is not within my possession, custody, and/or control.\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the Residence:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the ( a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 20**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\n- a. Daniel Podhaskie, Y anping Wang, and I. We are each represented by counsel.\n- b. Bravo Luck Limited.\n- c. Besides those caused by Plaintiff, there is the above-referenced Trust Agreement\n\nwith Bravo Luck Limited, as well as certain restrictions as to the transfer of shares\n\nheld by the Sherry Netherlands.\n\n- d. I cannot opine on its market value, though its sale value has significantly diminished as a result of Plaintiff's conduct.\n- e. The lease is currently held by Genever Holdings, LLC and has been during the relevant period of time. The beneficial owner is and has been Bravo Luck Limited during the relevant period of time.\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the real property located at 33 Ferncliff Road, Cos Cob, Connecticut, USA:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 21**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI am not the owner of this property and I am not in possession, custody, or control of the\n\ninformation requested in this Interrogatory.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 22**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the real property located at 373 Taconic Rd, Greenwich, Connecticut, USA:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person ( a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the ( a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI am not the owner of this property and I am not in possession, custody, or control of the\n\ninformation requested in this Interrogatory.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 23**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the real property located at Room 411 , 4th Floor, Nan Fung Tower, 173 Des Voeux Road Central, Hong Kong:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Mere st in it.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI am not the owner of this property and I am not in possession, custody, or control of the\n\ninformation requested in this Interrogatory.\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 24**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the real property known as Majestic View Manor, located at 20 South Bay Road, Hong Kong:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person ( a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 24**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI am not the owner of this property and I am not in possession, custody, or control of the\n\ninformation requested in this Interrogatory.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 25**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the real property located at 22 South Bay Road, Hong Kong:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or\n\ninterferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which ( a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person ( a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 25**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI am not the owner of this property and I am not in possession, custody, or control of the\n\ninformation requested in this Interrogatory.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 26**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for the real property located at 5 Princes Gate, Apartment 6, London, England SW7 lQJ:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person ( a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nI am not the owner of this property and I am not in possession, custody, or control of the\n\ninformation requested in this Interrogatory.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 27**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify, for any automobiles, sea vessels, airplanes, helicopters, or vehicles in which You or a Family Member have or has had an Interest:\n\n- a. Any Persons with knowledge about it.\n- b. Any Persons with any Interest in it.\n- c. Any sales, transfers, dispositions, pledges, liens, agreements, encumbrances, or interferences of any kind relating to it at any time.\n- d. Its current value.\n- e. Its current location, including without limitation the address, state, and jurisdiction.\n- f. If You or any Family Member no longer has any Interest in it, (i) the date on which (a) You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that Interest was seized; (ii) the Person (a) to which You or the Family Member sold, transferred, or disposed of that Interest, or (b) that seized that Interest; (iii) the (a) consideration, if any, for such sale or transfer, or (b) circumstances of such seizure; and (iv) all Persons that currently have an Interest in it.\n- g. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to it.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 27**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nNone. Defendant Kwok will not respond to this Interrogatory with respect to \"Family Members\"\n\npursuant to the objections made above.\n\nFor each debt with a value greater than \\$10,000 owed to You, a Family Member, or any Person in which You have an Interest, Identify:\n\n- a. The Person who owes the debt;\n- b. The Person to whom the debt is owed;\n- c. The amount of the debt;\n- d. The purpose and consideration for the debt;\n- e. Any Persons with knowledge of information relating to the debt; and\n- f. The custodian(s), location(s), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to the debt.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 28**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds: I\n\nam not aware of any debts owed to me as identified above, however, should I become aware of\n\nany such debts existing for the relevant time period, I reserve my right to supplement this\n\nresponse. Defendant Kwok will not respond to this Interrogatory with respect to \"Family\n\nMembers\" pursuant to the objections made above.\n\n#### **INTERROGATORY NO. 29**\n\nFor each debt with a value greater than \\$10,000 owed by You, a Family Member, or any Person in which You have an Interest, Identify:\n\n- a. The Person who owes the debt;\n- b. The Person to whom the debt is owed;\n- c. The amount of the debt;\n- d. The purpose and consideration for the debt;\n- e. Any Persons with knowledge of information relating to the debt; and\n- f. The custodian( s ), location( s ), and general description of all Documents and Communications relating to the debt.\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nNannan Itakura - \\$27,000.00.\n\nThe following are creditors of Genever Holdings, LLC: Sherry Netherland - \\$891 ,262.06;\n\nBravo Luck Limited - \\$67,5000,000.00; Golden Spring NY - \\$1 ,800,000.00; and Qiang Guo -\n\n\\$5,000,000.00.\n\nDefendant Kwok will not respond to this Interrogatory with respect to \"Family Members\"\n\npursuant to the objections made above.\n\n# **INTERROGATORY NO. 30**\n\nIdentify all third-party professionals, consultants and service providers (including without limitation any attorneys, bankers, asset managers, investment advisors, certified public accountants, and brokers) that were engaged by or performed services for You or for any Person in which you have an Interest (including without limitation those identified in Interrogatory 31 ).\n\n## **Response to Interrogatory No. 30**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nServices have been provided to me by my attorneys during the relevant time period. My\n\nattorneys are:\n\nBaker & Hostetler LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York NY 10001 212-589-4200\n\nAlvarez & Marsal 600 Madison A venue, 8th Floor New York, New York, 10022 (212) 759-4433\n\nZeichner Ellman & Krause LLP 1211 A venue of the Americas, 40th Floor New York, NY 10036 (212) 223-0400\n\nLawall & Mitchell, LLC 5 5 Madison Ave #400 Morristown, NJ 07960 (973) 285-3280\n\nSchulman Bhattacharya, LLC 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Suite 901 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 (240) 356-8550\n\nHodgson Russ LLP 605 3rd Ave #2300 New York, NY 10158 (212) 751-4300\n\nClayman & Rosenberg LLP 305 Madison Ave #650 · New York, NY 10165 (212) 922-1080\n\nHarcus Parker Limited 7th Floor Melbourne House 44-46 Aldwych London WC2B 4LL +44 (0)20 3995 3900\n\nLALIVE SA 35, Rue de la Mairie P.O. Box 6569 1211 Geneva 6 Switzerland +41 58 105 2000\n\nGoldfarb & Huck Roth Riojas, PLLC 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3950 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 452.0260\n\nThe Casper Firm, LLC 400 E. Pratt Street, Suite 903 Baltimore, MD 21202 ( 410) 989-5097\n\nGPS McQuhae LLP Suite 1801, Chinachem Exchange Square,\n\n1 Hoi Wan St, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong +852 3758 2421\n\n## **INTERROGATORY NO. 31<sup>9</sup>**\n\nTo the extent not already Identified in response to the prior Interrogatories, Identify the information requested in Interrogatory 2 subparts (a)-(1) for the following entities: Genever Holdings Corporation, Genever Holdings LLC, Auspicious Coast Limited, Bravo Luck Limited, Beijing Zenith Holdings Company Limited, AAGV Limited, Assets Sino Limited, BSA Strategic Fund I, Insight Phoenix Fund, Alfonso Global Limited, Allied Capital Global Limited, Creative Apex Investments Limited, Crystal Breeze Investments Limited, Elite Well Global Limited, Globalist International Limited, Infinitum Developments Limited, Infinite Increase Limited, Noble Fame Global Limited, Eastern Profit Corporation Limited, Alfa Global Ventures Limited, Ace Decade Holdings Limited, Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited, Anton Development Limited, Rosy Acme Ventures Limited, Leading Shine Limited, Golden Spring (New York) Limited, China Golden Spring (Hong Kong) Limited, Saraca Media Group, Voice of Guo Media Inc., GTV Media Group, Guo Media, GNews, Greenwich Land LLC, AI Group Holdings Inc., Hamilton Capital Holdings Inc., Gfashion Group, Next Tycoon Investments Limited, Shiny Times Holdings Limited, Spirit Charter Investment Limited, Beijing Pangu Investment Inc. and its affiliates, Worldwide Opportunity Holdings Limited, and Empire Growth Holdings Limited.\n\n#### **Response to Interrogatory No. 31**\n\nSubject to the General and Specific Objections made above, Defendant Kwok responds:\n\nSee responses to Interrogatories **1** and 2 above. I am not in possession, custody, or control of\n\nresponsive information with respect to any other entities listed.\n\nDated: New York, New York December 4, 2020\n\nRespectfully submitted,\n\n#### **BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP**\n\nBy: *Isl Melissa M Carvalho*\n\n<sup>9</sup> Pursuant to correspondence from Eddie Moss to Melissa Carvalho, dated November 19, 2020, this Request also includes the following accounts at Chase Manhattan Bank: 4563310029216029 and 4563310029216839.\n\nJohn Siegal Melissa M. Carvalho Erica Barrow Clark 45 Rockefeller Plaza 14th Floor New York, NY 10111 jsiegal@bakerlaw.com mcarvalho@bakerlaw.com ebarrow@bakerlaw.com\n\n*Attorneys for Defendent Kwok Ho Wan*\n\nTo: Edward Moss ( emoss@omm.com) Stuart Sarnoff (ssarnoff@omm.com) O'MEL VENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 (212) 326-2000\n\n-and-\n\nRobert W. Seiden (rseiden@seidenlegal.com) 1120 A venue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (212) 626-6708 *Attorneys for Plaintiff Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.*\n\n#### **VERIFICATION**\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK ) )ss: COUNTY OF NEW YORK )\n\nI, KWOK HO WAN, have read the foregoing DEFENDANT KWOK'S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.'S THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES, know the contents thereof, and declare under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of New York, that the representations made therein are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge.\n\nDated: December 4, 2020\n\nKWOK HO WAN\n\nDANIEL THOMAS PODHASKIE Notary Public, State of New York Reg. No. 02PO6394578 Qualmed in Queens County 0:immissioo Expires Juty 8, 2023\n\nSZOZ '8 Ajnr S8Jl(t;g l>OtSSIWWOQ ,\\)Unoo sueeno Uj P8Wl8110 8LSV6S90dZO 'ON 'Det! }µOA M8N JO 8\\8'\\S ':)l~nd N8'JON 31~Sv'H00d S\\fV!OHl 73IN\\;IO","body_zh":"案号 22-50073 文件 50-3 提交日期 02/28/22 登记日期 02/28/22 21:19:53 第 1 页，共 31 页\n附件 18\n纽约州纽约县最高法院（SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK）\n\nPACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.（太盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业），\n\n原告，\n\n诉\n\n案号 652077/2017\n\nBarry Ostrager 法官\n\n第 61 庭\n\nKWOK HO WAN（郭文贵）等，\n\n被告。\n被告郭文贵对原告 PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.（太盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）第三套书面质询的答复及异议\n\n被告 KWOK HO WAN（郭文贵）（以下简称“被告郭文贵”）基于目前所知及所信，并依照《民事诉讼法与规则》（CPLR）、商事庭规则以及本院 2020 年 10 月 15 日决定及命令（文件编号 630）（以下简称“命令”）的要求，现就原告 PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.（太盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）日期为 2020 年 11 月 6 日的第三套书面质询作出如下答复及提出如下异议\n\n（以下简称“书面质询”）：\n一般异议\n\n1. 被告郭文贵对该等书面质询提出异议，理由是其违反商事庭规则 11-a(a)，该规则将书面质询限制为“25 项，包括子项，除非预审会议命令规定其他限制。”\n\n2. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求提供未在时间上限定于争议相关期间的文件、信息或其他证据开示。\n\n3. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求提供并非合理地旨在发现可采纳证据的文件、信息或其他证据开示。\n\n4. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求提供超出 CPLR § 5229 和/或其他适用法律或法院规则所允许范围的文件、信息或其他证据开示。\n\n5. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求提供受律师—当事人保密特权、工作成果原则或任何其他适用特权、豁免或保护所保护的文件、信息或其他证据开示。\n\n6. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求提供由不受其控制或不在其有权提交范围内的第三方持有的文件、信息或其他证据开示。\n\n7. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求提供原告应当已经能够取得的文件。\n\n8. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其内容含糊或不明确。\n\n9. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其范围过宽或造成不当负担。\n\n10. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其构成或假定法律结论。\n\n11. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其以任何方式超出、抵触和/或变更全体当事人代理律师达成的任何协议。\n\n12. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其构成不合理的累积和重复。\n\n13. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其意图骚扰、压迫或对被告郭文贵施加不当负担。\n\n14. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求推测、臆测或法律结论。\n\n15. 被告郭文贵对每项书面质询提出异议，限于其要求提供被告郭文贵目前未知的信息。本文答复基于被告郭文贵目前的记忆、知识、信息和信念。被告郭文贵保留补充、修改、更正或澄清其答复的权利。\n\n16. 本文件中未提出任何异议，并不构成对该异议的放弃。\n具体答复及异议\n\n在不放弃上述一般异议的前提下，现将该等一般异议均以援引方式纳入本文，被告郭文贵就各项特定定义和书面质询作出如下答复及提出如下异议：\n定义 2（“权益”）\n\n“权益”一词系指任何直接或间接的权益，无论是部分、全部、潜在或或有权益，包括但不限于法定所有权、受益所有权、控制权、对法人实体任何或全部股份的所有权、有限责任公司或合伙企业中的成员资格或权益，或获取资金或资产的权利。\n对定义 2 的答复\n\n被告郭文贵对“权益”的定义提出异议，理由是该定义范围过宽、造成不当负担、超出 CPLR §5229 证据开示的范围，并且在其包括“潜在”权益的限度内超出本院命令的范围。被告郭文贵进一步对“权益”的定义提出异议，理由是在其包括“获取资金或资产的权利”的限度内，该定义含糊且不明确。被告郭文贵还对“权益”的定义提出异议，限于其要求推测、臆测或法律结论。\n\n定义 3（“资产”）\n\n“资产”一词系指任何种类的资产或财产，无论是有形或无形，包括但不限于现金、银行账户、经纪账户、不动产、土地、公司股份、有限责任公司或合伙企业中的成员资格或权益、股票、股份、债券、投资、投资工具、实际或潜在判决、留置权、地役权、扣押、租约、知识产权（包括但不限于专利和商标）、汽车、飞机、直升机、海船、车辆、艺术品、收藏品、服装、珠宝、加密货币、加密货币钱包、保险箱、动产、宝石或证券、商品、应收款项、可转换贷款及由金融工具产生的权益，无论是直接还是间接持有。\n对定义 3 的答复\n\n被告郭文贵对“资产”的定义提出异议，理由是该定义范围过宽、造成不当负担、超出 CPLR §5229 证据开示的范围，并且在其包括“无形”资产的限度内超出本院命令的范围。被告郭文贵进一步对“资产”的定义提出异议，理由是在其包括“无形”资产的限度内，该定义含糊且不明确。\n\n定义 4（“家庭成员”）\n\n“家庭成员”一词包括您的父母、兄弟姐妹、叔叔、伯伯、舅舅、姑姑和姨妈、配偶、表亲和再从表亲、子女、孙子女、侄子和侄女。\n对定义 4 的答复\n\n被告郭文贵对“家庭成员”的定义提出异议，理由是该定义范围过宽、造成不当负担、超出 CPLR §5229 证据开示的范围，并且超出本院命令的范围；该命令授权对 Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-尼德兰）住宅、Lady May（“Lady May”）游艇及“郭先生可能直接或间接拥有的其他资产”进行证据开示。被告郭文贵进一步对“家庭成员”的定义提出异议，限于其试图将其无权控制的个人第三方纳入该定义。郭先生的答复将限于“郭先生可能直接或间接拥有”的资产。\n\n指示 7（“期间”）\n\n除非另有规定，每项书面质询的适用期间均为自 January 1, 2008 起至提交之日止（包括该日）（以下简称“期间”）。\n对指示 7 的答复\n\n被告郭文贵对指示 7 中规定的“期间”提出异议，理由是其范围过宽、造成不当负担、超出 CPLR §5229 证据开示的范围，并且超出本院命令的范围；该命令授权对 Sherry-Netherland（雪莉-尼德兰）住宅、Lady May（“Lady May”）游艇及“郭先生可能直接或间接拥有的其他资产”进行证据开示。为本次证据开示之目的，相关期间为 October 15, 2020（CPLR §5229 程序记入记录之日）至今，以识别郭先生“可能直接或间接拥有”的任何资产。\n\n书面质询第 1 项1\n\n列明自 January 1, 2015 以来您在其中拥有或曾拥有权益的所有主体（不包括自然人）。\n\n1根据 Eddie Moss（埃迪·莫斯）致 Melissa Carvalho（梅丽莎·卡瓦略）、日期为 November 19, 2020 的函件，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank（大通曼哈顿银行）的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\n在遵守且不放弃上述一般异议和具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：我是 Genever Holdings Corporation（杰尼弗控股公司）已发行股份的法定所有人。Genever Holdings Corporation 是 Genever Holdings, LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司）的唯一股东。\n\n书面质询第 2 项2\n\n对于作为对书面质询第 1 项答复而列明的所有主体，列明：\n\na. 任何知悉该主体情况的主体。\n\nb. 亦在该主体中拥有权益的任何其他主体。\n\nc. 您在该主体中所持权益的价值，以及任何其他主体在该主体中所持任何权益的价值。\n\nd. 该主体董事会、经理委员会、成员委员会、顾问委员会或管理层的任何成员。\n\ne. 该主体的组织设立地或注册成立地所在州或司法管辖区。\n\nf. 该主体的注册成立或组织设立日期。\n\ng. 该主体直接或间接持有的、价值超过 $10,000 的任何及全部资产的描述、价值和所在地。\n\nh. 该主体间接或直接持有或控制的任何及全部银行、经纪、投资、加密货币或其他账户（包括但不限于银行或经纪机构名称、账户名称、获授权签字人、分行所在地、账号及余额）。\n\ni. 与该主体有关的所有文件和通信的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\nj. 该主体在其中拥有任何权益的任何及全部主体（并且，对于所有该等主体，列明子项 (a)-(i) 所要求的信息）。\n\nk. 对于您不再拥有任何权益的任何主体，(i) (a) 您出售、转让或处分该权益之日，或 (b) 该权益被扣押之日；(ii) (a) 您向其出售、转让或处分该权益的主体，或 (b) 扣押该权益的主体；(iii) (a) 该出售或转让的对价（如有），或 (b) 该扣押的情形；以及 (iv) 目前在该主体中拥有权益的所有主体。\n\n2根据 Eddie Moss（埃迪·莫斯）致 Melissa Carvalho（梅丽莎·卡瓦略）、日期为 November 19, 2020 的函件，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank（大通曼哈顿银行）的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\nl. 已对该主体设置或与该主体有关的任何及全部信托协议、质押、留置权、负担或任何种类的干扰。\n对书面质询第 2 项的答复：\n\n在遵守且不放弃上述一般异议和具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\nGenever Holdings Corporation（杰尼弗控股公司）：\n\na. Daniel Podhaskie（丹尼尔·波德哈斯基）、Yanping Wang（王艳萍）和我知悉与该实体有关的情况。我们各自均由律师代理。\n\nb. 无。\n\nc. 权益价值为零，因为唯一资产是 Genever Holdings, LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司），其负债大于资产。\n\nd. 我是唯一股东。\n\ne. British Virgin Islands（英属维尔京群岛）。\n\nf. February 13, 2015。\n\ng. 无。注意到其拥有 Genever Holdings, LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司）100%的股份。\n\nh. 无。\n\ni. Intertrust Corporate Services（英特信托公司服务公司），Ritter House（里特大厦），Tortola（托尔托拉岛）。\n\nj. 拥有 Genever Holdings, LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司）100%的股份。\n\nk. 无。\n\nl. 被告郭文贵、Genever Holdings Corporation（杰尼弗控股公司）、Genever Holdings, LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司）与 Bravo Luck Limited（布拉沃幸运有限公司）之间和/或其中存在一份信托协议。\n\nGenever Holdings, LLC（杰尼弗控股有限责任公司）：\n\na．Daniel Podhaskie（丹尼尔·波德哈斯基）、Yanping Wang（王雁平）及本人知悉与该实体有关的情况。我们各自均由律师代理。\nb．无。\nc．权益价值为零，因为唯一资产为 Genever Holdings, LLC（吉尼弗控股有限责任公司），其负债超过其资产。\nd．本人为唯一股东。\ne．纽约州。\nf．February 13, 2015\ng．无。需要指出的是，其为与该房产有关的承租人，该房产包括先前列明的 Sherry Netherlands coop shares（Sherry Netherlands合作公寓股份）。\nh．无。\ni．Daniel Podhaskie、Yanping Wang 及本人。\nj．拥有 Genever Holdings, LLC 100%的股份。\nk．无。\nl．被告 Kwok（郭文贵）、Genever Holdings Corporation（吉尼弗控股公司）、Genever Holdings, LLC 及 Bravo Luck Limited（宝华有限公司）之间和/或相互之间存在信托协议。\n\n列明任何家庭成员在其中拥有权益或自 January 1, 2015 起曾拥有权益的所有主体（不包括自然人）。\n对质询第 3 号的答复\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 不会答复该质询。\n\n质询第 4 号\n\n就答复质询第 3 号中列明的所有主体，列明：\n\na．知悉该主体情况的任何人士。\nb．同样在该主体中拥有权益的任何其他人士。\nc．家庭成员在该主体中所持权益的价值，以及任何其他人士在该主体中所持任何权益的价值。\nd．该主体董事会、经理委员会、成员委员会、顾问委员会或管理层的任何成员。\ne．该主体的设立或注册成立所在州或司法管辖区。\nf．该主体的注册成立或设立日期。\ng．该主体直接或间接持有的、价值超过 $10,000 的任何及全部资产的描述、价值和所在地。\nh．该主体直接或间接持有或控制的任何及全部银行、经纪、投资、加密货币或其他账户（包括但不限于银行或经纪商名称、账户名称、获授权签字人、分行所在地、账号及余额）。\ni．与该主体有关的全部文件和通信资料的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\nj．该主体在其中拥有任何权益的任何及全部人士（并就所有该等人士，列明分项 (a)-(i) 所要求的信息）。\n\n3 根据 Eddie Moss（埃迪·莫斯）于 November 19, 2020 致 Melissa Carvalho（梅利莎·卡瓦略）的通信，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank（大通曼哈顿银行）的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\n4 根据 Eddie Moss 于 November 19, 2020 致 Melissa Carvalho 的通信，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank 的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\nk．对于家庭成员不再拥有任何权益的任何主体，(i) 家庭成员(a)出售、转让或处分该权益，或(b)该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 家庭成员(a)向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人士，或(b)扣押该权益的人士；(iii)该等出售或转让的(a)对价（如有），或(b)该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv)目前在该主体中拥有权益的所有人士。\nl．已设定于该主体之上或与该主体有关的任何及全部信托协议、质押、留置权、权利负担或任何形式的干预。\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 不会答复该质询。\n\n质询第 5 号\n\n列明您在其中拥有权益或自 January 1, 2015 起曾拥有权益的、价值超过 $10,000 的任何资产。\n对质询第 5 号的答复\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 答复如下：\n\n本人是 Genever Holdings Corporation 已发行股份的法定所有人。Genever Holdings Corporation 是 Genever Holdings, LLC 的唯一股东，而后者是其唯一资产。正如 Genever Holdings, LLC 的破产申报文件所载，Genever Holdings, LLC 的负债超过其资产。\n\n质询第 6 号\n\n就答复质询第 5 号中列明的所有资产，列明：\n\na．知悉该资产情况的任何人士。\nb．\nc．您在该资产中所持权益的价值，以及任何其他人士在该资产中所持任何权益的价值。\nd．该资产所在的州或司法管辖区。\ne．您取得该资产中权益的日期。\nf．与该资产有关的全部文件和通信资料的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\ng．对于您不再拥有任何权益的任何资产，(i) 您(a)出售、转让或处分该权益，或(b)该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 您(a)向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人士，或(b)扣押该权益的人士；(iii)该等出售或转让的(a)对价（如有），或(b)该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv)目前在该资产中拥有权益的所有人士。\nh．已设定于该资产之上或与该资产有关的任何及全部信托协议、质押、留置权、权利负担或任何形式的干预。\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 答复如下：\n\n见上文对质询第 2 号的答复。\n\n质询第 7 号\n\n列明任何家庭成员在其中拥有权益或自 January 1, 2015 起曾拥有权益的、价值超过 $50,000 的任何资产。\n对质询第 7 号的答复\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 不会答复该质询。\n\n质询第 8 号\n\n就答复质询第 7 号中列明的所有资产，列明：\n\na．知悉该资产情况的任何人士。\nb．同样在该资产中拥有权益的任何其他人士。\nc．家庭成员在该资产中所持权益的价值，以及任何其他人士在该资产中所持任何权益的价值。\nd．该资产所在的州或司法管辖区。\ne．家庭成员取得该资产中权益的日期。\nf．与该资产有关的全部文件和通信资料的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\ng．对于任何家庭成员不再拥有任何权益的任何资产，(i) 家庭成员(a)出售、转让或处分该权益，或(b)该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 家庭成员(a)向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人士，或(b)扣押该权益的人士；(iii)该等出售或转让的(a)对价（如有），或(b)该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv)目前在该资产中拥有权益的所有人士。\nh．已设定于该资产之上或与该资产有关的任何及全部信托协议、质押、留置权、权利负担或任何形式的干预。\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 不会答复该质询。\n\n质询第 9 号\n\n列明您在其中拥有权益或自 January 1, 2015 起曾拥有权益的所有银行、经纪、投资、加密货币或其他账户。\n对质询第 9 号的答复\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 答复如下：\n\n无。\n\n质询第 10 号\n\n就答复质询第 9 号中列明的所有账户，列明：\n\na．知悉该账户情况的任何人士。\nb．银行或经纪商名称。\nc．该账户的账户名称。\n\n5 根据 Eddie Moss 于 November 19, 2020 致 Melissa Carvalho 的通信，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank 的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\n6 根据 Eddie Moss 于 November 19, 2020 致 Melissa Carvalho 的通信，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank 的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\nd．该账户的获授权签字人。\ne．分行所在地。\nf．账号。\ng．账户余额。\nh．同样在该账户中拥有权益的任何其他人士。\ni．您在该账户中所持权益的价值，以及任何其他人士在该账户中所持任何权益的价值。\nj．您取得该账户中权益的日期。\nk．与该账户有关的全部文件和通信资料的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\nl．对于您不再拥有任何权益的任何账户，(i) 您(a)出售、转让或处分该权益，或(b)该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 您(a)向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人士，或(b)扣押该权益的人士；(iii)该等出售或转让的(a)对价（如有），或(b)该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv)目前在该账户中拥有权益的所有人士。\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 答复如下：\n\n不适用。\n\n质询第 11 号\n\n列明任何家庭成员在其中拥有权益或自 January 1, 2015 起曾拥有权益的所有银行、经纪、投资、加密货币或其他账户。\n对质询第 11 号的答复\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 不会答复该质询。\n\n7 根据 Eddie Moss 于 November 19, 2020 致 Melissa Carvalho 的通信，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank 的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\n就答复质询第 11 号中列明的所有账户，列明：\n\na．知悉该账户情况的任何人士。\nb．银行或经纪商名称。\nc．该账户的账户名称。\nd．该账户的获授权签字人。\ne．分行所在地。\nf．账号。\ng．账户余额。\nh．同样在该账户中拥有权益的任何其他人士。\ni．任何家庭成员在该账户中所持权益的价值，以及任何其他人士在该账户中所持任何权益的价值。\nj．家庭成员取得该账户中权益的日期。\nk．与该账户有关的全部文件和通信资料的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\nl．对于家庭成员不再拥有任何权益的任何账户，(i) 家庭成员(a)出售、转让或处分该权益，或(b)该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 家庭成员(a)向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人士，或(b)扣押该权益的人士；(iii)该等出售或转让的(a)对价（如有），或(b)该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv)目前在该账户中拥有权益的所有人士。\nm．已设定于该账户之上或与该账户有关的任何及全部信托协议、质押、留置权、权利负担或任何形式的干预。\n对质询第 12 号的答复\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 不会答复该质询。\n\n8 根据 Eddie Moss 于 November 19, 2020 致 Melissa Carvalho 的通信，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank 的下列账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\n列明与您的个人财务状况、资产及您在任何主体中的权益有关的全部文件和通信资料的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n对质询第 13 号的答复\n\n在遵守上文提出的一般及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok 答复如下：\n\nDaniel Podhaskie、Yanping Wang 及本人是相关信息和公司文件的保管人，该等文件位于 162 E. 64th Street, New York, New York 10065。\n\n质询第 14 号\n\n列明您自 January 1, 2015 起收到的任何礼物、利益、付款、收入或贷款（包括但不限于类型、价值、来源及金额）。\n对质询第 14 号的答复\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok（郭文贵）答复如下：\n\n该书面询问将“利益”纳入其范围的部分不明确，但就相关期间内收到的其他赠与、付款、收入或贷款而言，并无此类事项。\n\n第15号书面询问\n\n请指明自2015年1月1日以来您已作出或给予的任何赠与、利益、付款、收入或贷款（包括但不限于其类型、价值、来源及金额）。\n\n对第15号书面询问的答复\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok答复如下：\n\n该书面询问将“利益”纳入其范围的部分不明确，但就相关期间内作出或给予的其他赠与、付款、收入或贷款而言，并无此类事项。\n\n在未就先前书面询问作出答复时已予指明的范围内，请就Kwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）于2016年2月5日为支持原告反对被告在Ace Decade Holdings Ltd.（十年王牌控股有限公司）诉UBS AG（瑞银集团）案，Index No. 653316/2015（New York Supreme Court（纽约州最高法院））中提出的驳回起诉书动议而提交的宣誓书第35段所提及的“纽约个人JPMorgan Chase（摩根大通）账户”，指明：\n\na. 任何知悉该账户情况的人员。\n\nb. 任何对该账户享有任何权益的人员。\n\nc. 银行或经纪商名称。\n\nd. 该账户登记的名称。\n\ne. 该账户的授权签字人。\n\nf. 分行所在地。\n\ng. 账户号码。\n\nh. 账户余额。\n\ni. 您在该账户中的权益价值，以及任何其他人员在该账户中持有的任何权益价值。\n\nj. 您取得该账户权益的日期。\n\nk. 任何家庭成员取得该账户权益的日期。\n\nl. 与该账户有关的所有文件及通信的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\nm. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对该账户享有任何权益，(i)（a）您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处分该权益的日期，或（b）该权益被扣押的日期；(ii)（a）您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人员，或（b）扣押该权益的人员；(iii)（a）该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或（b）该等扣押的情形；以及(iv)目前对该账户享有权益的所有人员。\n\nn. 已对该账户施加或与该账户有关的任何及所有信托协议、质押、留置权、产权负担或任何类型的干扰。\n\n对第16号书面询问的答复\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok答复如下：\n\n据我所能回忆，该账户于2017年3月或4月左右关闭，且无疑远早于2020年10月15日。\n\n第17号书面询问\n\n在未就先前书面询问作出答复时已予指明的范围内，请就UBS AG Hong Kong Branch（瑞银集团香港分行）账号371236的银行账户指明下列信息；该账户载于Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东利有限公司）于2019年11月22日在Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd.（东利有限公司）诉Strategic Vision US LLC（战略愿景美国有限责任公司）案，C.A. No. 18-cv-2185 (JGK) (Southern District of New York（纽约南区）) (ECF No. 203-2)中就函件动议提交的答复之附件B第16页：\n\na. 任何知悉该账户情况的人员。\n\nb. 任何对该账户享有任何权益的人员。\n\nc. 银行或经纪商名称。\n\nd. 该账户登记的名称。\n\ne. 该账户的授权签字人。\n\nf. 分行所在地。\n\ng. 账户号码。\n\nh. 账户余额。\n\ni. 您在该账户中的权益价值，以及任何其他人员在该账户中持有的任何权益价值。\n\nj. 您取得该账户权益的日期。\n\nk. 任何家庭成员取得该账户权益的日期。\n\nl. 与该账户有关的所有文件及通信的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\nm. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对该账户享有任何权益，(i)（a）您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处分该权益的日期，或（b）该权益被扣押的日期；(ii)（a）您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人员，或（b）扣押该权益的人员；(iii)（a）该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或（b）该等扣押的情形；以及(iv)目前对该账户享有权益的所有人员。\n\nn. 已对该账户施加或与该账户有关的任何及所有信托协议、质押、留置权、产权负担或任何类型的干扰。\n\n对第17号书面询问的答复\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok答复如下：\n\n尽管该案被告试图将我纳入该案，但该等请求已被简易驳回。我不是上述所涉案件的当事人。上述所提及文件明确说明，所指明的账户并非由我持有。还应注意的是，该文件似乎是Hong Kong High Court（香港高等法院）的文件，而该法院受Chinese Communist Party（中国共产党）的直接控制。\n\n第18号书面询问\n\n就UBS于2015年2月23日代表您致Sherry Netherland（雪梨-内瑟兰）的函件（该函件已在本诉讼中以案卷编号256提交，并标有贝茨编号SN 0056），请指明：\n\na. SN 0056中所称的“个人投资公司”。\n\nb. SN 0056中所称“涉及该银行关系的资金”所关联的账户。\n\nc. 就分项(b)所指明的账户，提供第16号书面询问分项(a)至(n)所要求的信息。\n\n对第18号书面询问的答复\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok答复如下：\n\n除第三方对某一未指明账户的含糊提及外，如未获得更多信息，我无法答复该书面询问。我可以确定地说，截至2020年10月15日，即本组书面询问的相关期间，我在UBS没有个人账户。\n\n第19号书面询问\n\n在未就先前书面询问作出答复时已予指明的范围内，请就Lady May指明：\n\na. 任何知悉其情况的人员。\n\nb. 任何对其享有任何权益的人员。\n\nc. 在任何时间与其有关的任何出售、转让、处分、质押、留置权、协议、产权负担或任何类型的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 其当前所在地，包括但不限于地址、州及管辖区。\n\nf. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其享有任何权益，(i)（a）您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处分该权益的日期，或（b）该权益被扣押的日期；(ii)（a）您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人员，或（b）扣押该权益的人员；(iii)（a）该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或（b）该等扣押的情形；以及(iv)目前对其享有权益的所有人员。\n\ng. 与其有关的所有文件及通信的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok答复如下：\n\na. Hong Kong International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC（香港国际基金投资〈美国〉有限公司，LLC）和Mei Guo（郭美）。\n\n两者均由律师代理。\n\nb. Hong Kong International Funds Investments (USA) Limited, LLC和Mei Guo。\n\nc. 相关信息不在我的占有、保管及/或控制之下。\n\nd. 相关信息不在我的占有、保管及/或控制之下。\n\ne. 相关信息不在我的占有、保管及/或控制之下。\n\nf. 我不享有权益。除此之外，相关信息不在我的占有、保管及/或控制之下，但需说明的是，我不知道存在任何扣押、出售、转让或处分。\n\ng. 相关信息不在我的占有、保管及/或控制之下。\n\n在未就先前书面询问作出答复时已予指明的范围内，请就该住宅指明：\n\na. 任何知悉其情况的人员。\n\nb. 任何对其享有任何权益的人员。\n\nc. 在任何时间与其有关的任何出售、转让、处分、质押、留置权、协议、产权负担或任何类型的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其享有任何权益，(i)（a）您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处分该权益的日期，或（b）该权益被扣押的日期；(ii)（a）您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人员，或（b）扣押该权益的人员；(iii)（a）该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或（b）该等扣押的情形；以及(iv)目前对其享有权益的所有人员。\n\nf. 与其有关的所有文件及通信的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n对第20号书面询问的答复\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok答复如下：\n\na. Daniel Podhaskie（丹尼尔·波德哈斯基）、Yanping Wang（王燕平）和我。我们各自均由律师代理。\n\nb. Bravo Luck Limited（卓福有限公司）。\n\nc. 除原告所造成者外，还有上述与Bravo Luck Limited签订的信托协议，以及对Sherry Netherland所持股份转让的若干限制。\n\nd. 我无法就其市场价值发表意见，尽管因原告的行为，其出售价值已显著下降。\n\ne. 该租约目前由Genever Holdings, LLC（吉尼弗控股有限公司，LLC）持有，并且在相关期间内一直由其持有。相关期间内的受益所有人现为且一直为Bravo Luck Limited。\n\n在未就先前书面询问作出答复时已予指明的范围内，请就位于美国康涅狄格州Cos Cob市Ferncliff Road 33号的不动产指明：\n\na. 任何知悉其情况的人员。\n\nb. 任何对其享有任何权益的人员。\n\nc. 在任何时间与其有关的任何出售、转让、处分、质押、留置权、协议、产权负担或任何类型的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其享有任何权益，(i)（a）您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处分该权益的日期，或（b）该权益被扣押的日期；(ii)（a）您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人员，或（b）扣押该权益的人员；(iii)（a）该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或（b）该等扣押的情形；以及(iv)目前对其享有权益的所有人员。\n\nf. 与其有关的所有文件及通信的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n对第21号书面询问的答复\n\n在遵守上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告Kwok答复如下：\n\n我不是该不动产的所有人，且我不占有、保管或控制本书面询问所要求的信息。\n\n第22号书面询问\n\n在未就先前书面询问作出答复时已予指明的范围内，请就位于美国康涅狄格州格林威治市Taconic Rd 373号的不动产指明：\n\na. 任何知悉其情况的人员。\n\nb. 任何对其享有任何权益的人员。\n\nc. 在任何时间与其有关的任何出售、转让、处分、质押、留置权、协议、产权负担或任何类型的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其享有任何权益，(i)（a）您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处分该权益的日期，或（b）该权益被扣押的日期；(ii)（a）您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处分该权益的人员，或（b）扣押该权益的人员；(iii)（a）该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或（b）该等扣押的情形；以及(iv)目前对其享有权益的所有人员。\n\nf. 与其有关的所有文件及通信的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告 Kwok（郭文贵）答复如下：\n\n我并非该房产的所有人，且我并不占有、保管或控制本质询问书所要求的信息。\n\n第23号质询问询\n\n在先前质询问询的答复中尚未指明的范围内，就位于香港中环德辅道中173号南丰大厦4楼411室的房地产，指明：\n\na. 任何知悉该房地产情况的人士。\n\nb. 对该房地产拥有任何权益的任何人士。\n\nc. 在任何时间与该房地产有关的任何出售、转让、处置、质押、留置权、协议、负担或任何种类的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其拥有任何权益，(i) 您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处置该权益的日期，或该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处置该权益的人士，或扣押该权益的人士；(iii) 该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv) 目前对其拥有权益的所有人士。\n\nf. 与其有关的所有文件和通讯的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\n我并非该房产的所有人，且我并不占有、保管或控制本质询问书所要求的信息。\n\n第24号质询问询\n\n在先前质询问询的答复中尚未指明的范围内，就名为 Majestic View Manor（华景庄园）、位于香港南湾道20号的房地产，指明：\n\na. 任何知悉该房地产情况的人士。\n\nb. 对该房地产拥有任何权益的任何人士。\n\nc. 在任何时间与该房地产有关的任何出售、转让、处置、质押、留置权、协议、负担或任何种类的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其拥有任何权益，(i) 您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处置该权益的日期，或该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处置该权益的人士，或扣押该权益的人士；(iii) 该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv) 目前对其拥有权益的所有人士。\n\nf. 与其有关的所有文件和通讯的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n对第24号质询问询的答复\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\n我并非该房产的所有人，且我并不占有、保管或控制本质询问书所要求的信息。\n\n第25号质询问询\n\n在先前质询问询的答复中尚未指明的范围内，就位于香港南湾道22号的房地产，指明：\n\na. 任何知悉该房地产情况的人士。\n\nb. 对该房地产拥有任何权益的任何人士。\n\nc. 在任何时间与该房地产有关的任何出售、转让、处置、质押、留置权、协议、负担或任何种类的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其拥有任何权益，(i) 您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处置该权益的日期，或该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处置该权益的人士，或扣押该权益的人士；(iii) 该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv) 目前对其拥有权益的所有人士。\n\nf. 与其有关的所有文件和通讯的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n对第25号质询问询的答复\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\n我并非该房产的所有人，且我并不占有、保管或控制本质询问书所要求的信息。\n\n第26号质询问询\n\n在先前质询问询的答复中尚未指明的范围内，就位于英国伦敦 SW7 lQJ，5 Princes Gate（王子门5号）6号公寓的房地产，指明：\n\na. 任何知悉该房地产情况的人士。\n\nb. 对该房地产拥有任何权益的任何人士。\n\nc. 在任何时间与该房地产有关的任何出售、转让、处置、质押、留置权、协议、负担或任何种类的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其拥有任何权益，(i) 您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处置该权益的日期，或该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处置该权益的人士，或扣押该权益的人士；(iii) 该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv) 目前对其拥有权益的所有人士。\n\nf. 与其有关的所有文件和通讯的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\n我并非该房产的所有人，且我并不占有、保管或控制本质询问书所要求的信息。\n\n第27号质询问询\n\n在先前质询问询的答复中尚未指明的范围内，就您或家庭成员拥有或曾经拥有权益的任何汽车、船舶、飞机、直升机或车辆，指明：\n\na. 任何知悉该车辆情况的人士。\n\nb. 对该车辆拥有任何权益的任何人士。\n\nc. 在任何时间与该车辆有关的任何出售、转让、处置、质押、留置权、协议、负担或任何种类的干扰。\n\nd. 其当前价值。\n\ne. 其当前位置，包括但不限于地址、州及管辖区域。\n\nf. 如您或任何家庭成员不再对其拥有任何权益，(i) 您或该家庭成员出售、转让或处置该权益的日期，或该权益被扣押的日期；(ii) 您或该家庭成员向其出售、转让或处置该权益的人士，或扣押该权益的人士；(iii) 该等出售或转让的对价（如有），或该等扣押的情形；以及 (iv) 目前对其拥有权益的所有人士。\n\ng. 与其有关的所有文件和通讯的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n对第27号质询问询的答复\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\n无。根据上述异议，被告郭文贵不会就“家庭成员”答复本质询问询。\n\n对于欠付您、家庭成员或您拥有权益的任何人士的、价值超过 \\$10,000 的每笔债务，指明：\n\na. 欠付该债务的人士；\n\nb. 该债务的债权人；\n\nc. 该债务的金额；\n\nd. 该债务的目的及对价；\n\ne. 知悉与该债务有关信息的任何人士；以及\n\nf. 与该债务有关的所有文件和通讯的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n对第28号质询问询的答复\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：我并不知悉存在任何如上所述欠付于我的债务；但是，如我得知在相关期间存在任何该等债务，我保留补充本答复的权利。根据上述异议，被告郭文贵不会就“家庭成员”答复本质询问询。\n\n第29号质询问询\n\n对于您、家庭成员或您拥有权益的任何人士所欠付的、价值超过 \\$10,000 的每笔债务，指明：\n\na. 欠付该债务的人士；\n\nb. 该债务的债权人；\n\nc. 该债务的金额；\n\nd. 该债务的目的及对价；\n\ne. 知悉与该债务有关信息的任何人士；以及\n\nf. 与该债务有关的所有文件和通讯的保管人、所在地及一般描述。\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\nNannan Itakura（板仓楠楠）- \\$27,000.00。\n\n以下为 Genever Holdings, LLC（吉尼弗控股有限责任公司）的债权人：Sherry Netherland（谢里·内瑟兰）- \\$891 ,262.06；Bravo Luck Limited（布拉沃幸运有限公司）- \\$67,5000,000.00；Golden Spring NY（纽约金泉）- \\$1 ,800,000.00；以及 Qiang Guo（郭强）- \\$5,000,000.00。\n\n根据上述异议，被告郭文贵不会就“家庭成员”答复本质询问询。\n\n第30号质询问询\n\n指明所有由您或您拥有权益的任何人士聘用、或向您或该等人士提供服务的第三方专业人士、顾问和服务提供者（包括但不限于任何律师、银行家、资产管理人、投资顾问、注册会计师及经纪人）（包括但不限于第31号质询问询中所指明者）。\n\n对第30号质询问询的答复\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\n在相关期间，我的律师曾向我提供服务。我的律师为：\n\nBaker & Hostetler LLP（贝克·霍斯特特勒律师事务所） 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York NY 10001 212-589-4200\n\nAlvarez & Marsal（阿尔瓦雷斯与马萨尔） 600 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor New York, New York, 10022 (212) 759-4433\n\nZeichner Ellman & Krause LLP（蔡希纳·埃尔曼与克劳斯律师事务所） 1211 Avenue of the Americas, 40th Floor New York, NY 10036 (212) 223-0400\n\nLawall & Mitchell, LLC（洛沃尔与米切尔有限责任公司） 55 Madison Ave #400 Morristown, NJ 07960 (973) 285-3280\n\nSchulman Bhattacharya, LLC（舒尔曼·巴塔查亚有限责任公司） 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Suite 901 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 (240) 356-8550\n\nHodgson Russ LLP（霍奇森·拉斯律师事务所） 605 3rd Ave #2300 New York, NY 10158 (212) 751-4300\n\nClayman & Rosenberg LLP（克莱曼与罗森伯格律师事务所） 305 Madison Ave #650 · New York, NY 10165 (212) 922-1080\n\nHarcus Parker Limited（哈克斯·帕克有限公司） 7th Floor Melbourne House 44-46 Aldwych London WC2B 4LL +44 (0)20 3995 3900\n\nLALIVE SA（拉利夫股份公司） 35, Rue de la Mairie P.O. Box 6569 1211 Geneva 6 Switzerland +41 58 105 2000\n\nGoldfarb & Huck Roth Riojas, PLLC（戈德法布与赫克·罗斯·里奥哈斯专业有限责任公司） 925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 3950 Seattle, Washington 98104 (206) 452.0260\n\nThe Casper Firm, LLC（卡斯珀律师事务所有限责任公司） 400 E. Pratt Street, Suite 903 Baltimore, MD 21202 (410) 989-5097\n\nGPS McQuhae LLP（GPS McQuhae律师事务所） Suite 1801, Chinachem Exchange Square,\n\n1 Hoi Wan St, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong +852 3758 2421\n\n第31号质询问询\n\n在先前质询问询的答复中尚未指明的范围内，就下列实体，指明第2号质询问询(a)-(l)分项所要求的信息：Genever Holdings Corporation（吉尼弗控股公司）、Genever Holdings LLC、Auspicious Coast Limited（吉祥海岸有限公司）、Bravo Luck Limited、Beijing Zenith Holdings Company Limited（北京泽尼思控股有限公司）、AAGV Limited（AAGV有限公司）、Assets Sino Limited（中资资产有限公司）、BSA Strategic Fund I（BSA战略基金I）、Insight Phoenix Fund（洞察凤凰基金）、Alfonso Global Limited（阿方索环球有限公司）、Allied Capital Global Limited（联合资本环球有限公司）、Creative Apex Investments Limited（创意顶峰投资有限公司）、Crystal Breeze Investments Limited（水晶微风投资有限公司）、Elite Well Global Limited（精英优泉环球有限公司）、Globalist International Limited（环球主义者国际有限公司）、Infinitum Developments Limited（无限发展有限公司）、Infinite Increase Limited（无限增长有限公司）、Noble Fame Global Limited（卓名环球有限公司）、Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东方利润有限公司）、Alfa Global Ventures Limited（阿尔法环球创投有限公司）、Ace Decade Holdings Limited（王牌十年控股有限公司）、Hong Kong International Funds Investments Limited（香港国际基金投资有限公司）、Anton Development Limited（安东发展有限公司）、Rosy Acme Ventures Limited（玫瑰顶峰创投有限公司）、Leading Shine Limited（领先光辉有限公司）、Golden Spring (New York) Limited（黄金泉〈纽约〉有限公司）、China Golden Spring (Hong Kong) Limited（中国黄金泉〈香港〉有限公司）、Saraca Media Group（萨拉卡媒体集团）、Voice of Guo Media Inc.（郭之声媒体公司）、GTV Media Group（GTV媒体集团）、Guo Media（郭媒体）、GNews（郭新闻）、Greenwich Land LLC（格林尼治土地有限责任公司）、AI Group Holdings Inc.（AI集团控股公司）、Hamilton Capital Holdings Inc.（汉密尔顿资本控股公司）、Gfashion Group（G时尚集团）、Next Tycoon Investments Limited（下一大亨投资有限公司）、Shiny Times Holdings Limited（辉煌时代控股有限公司）、Spirit Charter Investment Limited（精神特许投资有限公司）、Beijing Pangu Investment Inc.（北京盘古投资公司）及其关联方、Worldwide Opportunity Holdings Limited（全球机会控股有限公司）以及 Empire Growth Holdings Limited（帝国增长控股有限公司）。\n\n对第31号质询问询的答复\n\n在遵从上述一般性及具体异议的前提下，被告郭文贵答复如下：\n\n见上文对质询问题第 1 和第 2 项的答复。对于所列任何其他实体，我并不占有、保管或控制相关信息。\n\n日期：New York, New York December 4, 2020\n\n谨此提交，\nBAKER & HOSTETLER LLP（贝克·霍斯特勒律师事务所）\n\n签字：Melissa M. Carvalho（梅利莎·M·卡瓦略）\n\n9 根据 Eddie Moss（埃迪·莫斯）于 November 19, 2020 致 Melissa Carvalho（梅利莎·卡瓦略）的函件，本请求还包括 Chase Manhattan Bank（大通曼哈顿银行）的以下账户：4563310029216029 和 4563310029216839。\n\nJohn Siegal（约翰·西格尔） Melissa M. Carvalho（梅利莎·M·卡瓦略） Erica Barrow Clark（埃丽卡·巴罗·克拉克） 45 Rockefeller Plaza 14th Floor New York, NY 10111 jsiegal@bakerlaw.com mcarvalho@bakerlaw.com ebarrow@bakerlaw.com\n\n被告 Kwok Ho Wan（郭文贵）的代理律师\n\n收件人：Edward Moss（爱德华·莫斯）（emoss@omm.com） Stuart Sarnoff（斯图尔特·萨诺夫）（ssarnoff@omm.com） O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP（欧迈律师事务所） 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 (212) 326-2000\n\n以及\n\nRobert W. Seiden（罗伯特·W·赛登）（rseiden@seidenlegal.com） 1120 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (212) 626-6708 原告 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.（太平洋联盟亚洲机会基金有限合伙企业）的代理律师\n\n核验声明\n\n纽约州\n纽约县\n\n本人，KWOK HO WAN（郭文贵），已阅读上述《被告 KWOK 对原告 PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P. 第三组质询问题的答复及异议》，知悉其内容，并依纽约州法律在伪证罪处罚的约束下声明：其中所作陈述，据本人亲身所知，真实且正确。\n\n日期：December 4, 2020\n\nKWOK HO WAN\n\nDANIEL THOMAS PODHASKIE（丹尼尔·托马斯·波达斯基）\n纽约州公证人\n注册号：02PO6394578\n具备 Queens County 执业资格\n任期届满：July 8, 2023\n\nDANIEL THOMAS PODHASKIE（丹尼尔·托马斯·波达斯基）\n纽约州公证人\n注册号：02PO6394578\n具备 Queens County 执业资格\n任期届满：July 8, 2025","key_entities":["Kwok","Guo","Yanping Wang","GTV","Saraca","Chinese Communist Party"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":203,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":630,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":8025,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-02-28 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-02-28","updated_at":"2026-08-23 20:20:52"}