{"id":"court_ctb_935_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":935,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":null,"title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION | -------------------------------------------","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"### **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x                                      |  |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--|\n| In re:                                                      | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11                   |  |\n| HO WAN KWOK,                                                | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)<br>: |  |\n| Debtor.1                                                    | :<br>:                                 |  |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x                                      |  |\n\n## **MOTION, PURSUANT TO BANKRUPTCY RULE 9006(c)(1), TO EXPEDITE HEARING, IF ANY, ON MOTION OF CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE FOR ENTRY OF ORDER HOLDING DEBTOR IN CIVIL CONTEMPT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ORDER**\n\nChapter 11 Trustee Luc A. Despins (the \"Trustee\"), by and through his undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 9006(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the \"Bankruptcy Rules\"), hereby moves (the \"Motion to Expedite\") this Court for an order scheduling an expedited hearing, if any, to consider and determine the *Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee for Entry of Order Holding Debtor in Civil Contempt for Failure to Comply with Corporate Governance Order* [Docket No. 913] (the \"Contempt Motion\").<sup>2</sup> In support of his Motion to Expedite, the Trustee respectfully states as follows:\n\n## **JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND STATUTORY BASIS**\n\n1. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (the \"Court\") has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the *Standing Order of Reference* from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (as amended). The\n\n<sup>1</sup> Although the Debtor's legal name is Ho Wan Kwok, he is also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo, and Miles Kwok, as well as numerous other aliases. The last four digits of the Debtor's taxpayer identification number are 9595.\n\n<sup>2</sup> Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Contempt Motion.\n\nContempt Motion, including this Motion to Expedite with respect thereto, is a core proceeding within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b).\n\n2. Venue in this District is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409.\n\n3. The basis for the relief sought by this Motion to Expedite is Bankruptcy Rule 9006(c)(1).\n\n#### **BACKGROUND**\n\n4. On February 15, 2022 (the \"Petition Date\"), the Debtor filed with the Court a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.\n\n5. On March 21, 2022, the United States Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (\"Committee\") in the Debtor's chapter 11 case (the \"Chapter 11 Case\"). No examiner has been appointed in the Chapter 11 Case.\n\n6. On June 15, 2022, the Court entered a memorandum of decision and order [ECF No. 465] (the \"Trustee Order\") directing the United States Trustee to appoint a chapter 11 trustee in the Chapter 11 Case. Pursuant to the Trustee Order, the United States Trustee selected Luc A. Despins as the Trustee.\n\n7. On July 8, 2022, the Court entered an order granting the appointment of Luc A. Despins as the Trustee in the Chapter 11 Case [ECF No. 523] (the \"Appointment Order\").\n\n8. On July 23, 2022, the Trustee filed the *Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee for Entry of Order, Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 363, 541, 1108, and 105, (A) Confirming That Chapter 11 Trustee Holds All of Debtor's Economic Rights in Debtor-Controlled Entities, (B) Authorizing Chapter 11 Trustee to Act in Any Foreign Country on Behalf of the Estate, and Granting Related Relief* [Docket No. 598] (the \"Corporate Governance Rights Motion\").\n\n9. As detailed in the Corporate Governance Rights Motion, the Trustee sought such relief because the Debtor has shown a willingness to defy court orders, suggesting that the Debtor and related persons (whether acting individually or through the Debtor-Controlled Entities) may try to take advantage of any ambiguity or misunderstanding concerning the Trustee's rights in order to frustrate the Trustee's efforts to identify and recover property of the Estate.<sup>3</sup>\n\n10. On August 10, 2022, the Court granted the Corporate Governance Rights Motion and entered its *Order, Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Sections 363, 521, 541, 1108, and 105, (A) Confirming that Chapter 11 Trustee Holds All of Debtor's Economic and Corporate Governance Rights in Debtor-Controlled Entities, (B) Authorizing Chapter 11 Trustee to Act in Any Foreign Country on Behalf of Estate, and (C) Granting Related Relief* [Docket No. 761] (the \"Corporate Governance Rights Order\").\n\n11. The Corporate Governance Rights Order confirms that the Trustee holds all of the Debtor's economic and corporate governance rights with respect to all Debtor-Controlled Entities and, moreover, directs the Debtor to \"cooperate with the Trustee to enable the Trustee to perform his duties\" and \"surrender to the Trustee all property of the estate and any recorded information, including, without limitation, books, documents, records, and papers relating to property of the estate.\" <sup>4</sup> The foregoing provisions are in full force and effect.\n\n## **THE CONTEMPT MOTION**<sup>5</sup>\n\n12. By the Contempt Motion, the Trustee requests that the Court hold the Debtor in civil contempt for the Debtor's willful failure and refusal to comply with the Corporate\n\n<sup>3</sup> Corporate Governance Rights Motion ¶ 1\n\n<sup>4</sup> Corporate Governance Rights Order ¶¶ 2, 3.\n\n<sup>5</sup> The following summary of the relief sought in the Contempt Motion is qualified in its entirety by the Contempt Motion.\n\nGovernance Rights Order as it pertains to Ace Decade Holdings Limited (\"Ace Decade\") and, indirectly, Dawn State Limited (\"Dawn State\"), Ace Decade's wholly owned subsidiary.\n\n13. As detailed in the Contempt Motion, the Debtor has repeatedly admitted, in court filings and/or under oath, that he owns Ace Decade and, indirectly, Dawn State Limited (\"Dawn State\"), Ace Decade's wholly owned subsidiary.\n\n14. The Trustee has expressly requested that the Debtor comply with the Corporate Governance Rights Order as it pertains to Ace Decade and Dawn State – starting thirty-eight days ago. On August 31, 2022, the Trustee sent a letter to Debtor's counsel (the \"August 31, 2022 Letter\") requesting that the Debtor cause his shares in Ace Decade to be transferred to the Trustee no later than September 6, 2022.<sup>6</sup> To date the Debtor has not transferred the shares in Ace Decade to the Trustee, nor has the Debtor provided any corporate documents or any evidence that the Debtor is not the owner of Ace Decade.\n\n15. The Trustee has also raised the Debtor's non-compliance at prior status conferences before the Court. Only after four weeks of delay did the Debtor's counsel respond to the August 31, 2022 Letter by asserting at the September 27, 2022 status conference that the Debtor purports not own Ace Decade and that his admission at the Section 341 Meeting to the contrary was purportedly the result of a series of mistranslations. Debtor's counsel did not address the Debtor's other written admissions that he owns Ace Decade. As discussed in the Contempt Motion, the Debtor's latest alternative facts strain credulity.\n\n16. To enforce the Corporate Governance Rights Order, and to oppose the Debtor's latest efforts to rewrite history, including his own testimony regarding facts within his knowledge,\n\n<sup>6</sup> The August 31 Letter also requested that the share transfer instrument and the related director's resolution be in the same form as the corresponding documents related to the transfer of shares of Genever (BVI) (which documents had been attached as Exhibit A to the Corporate Governance Rights Order).\n\nthe Trustee filed the Contempt Motion on October 4, 2022. The Contempt Motion requests that the Court hold the Debtor in contempt, impose appropriate sanctions to coerce the Debtor's compliance with the Corporate Governance Rights Order, and order that the Debtor shall be judicially estopped from asserting in this chapter 11 case that he does not own Ace Decade.\n\n#### **RELIEF REQUESTED**\n\n17. Bankruptcy Rule 9006(c)(1) provides that the Court may reduce the notice period when requested by motion upon cause shown. Cause exists to consider and determine the Contempt Motion upon an expedited basis.\n\n18. It is imperative that the Court swiftly adjudicate the Contempt Motion to require the Debtor's compliance with the Corporate Governance Rights Order, permit the Trustee to continue his investigation and administration of the estate as it pertains to these assets, and to ensure that the Debtor does not benefit (if only by delay) from his willful defiance of the Court's orders. There is no prejudice to the Debtor by expediting the hearing on the Contempt Motion, given that this matter has been pending for more than a month now.\n\n19. The Trustee requests that a hearing on the Contempt Motion be scheduled for the week of October 24, 2022, on a date that is convenient to the Court.\n\n20. The Trustee further requests that the Court direct that notice of the Contempt Motion and the Court's order granting this Motion to Expedite and scheduling a hearing, be served on all parties-in-interest appearing in the Chapter 11 Case qualified to receive electronic notice via the Court's CM/ECF service, as well as the Debtor, the Committee, and the United States Trustee, and that the Court set an appropriate deadline for the Debtor to object to the Contempt Motion in advance of the hearing.\n\n5\n\nWHEREFORE, the Trustee requests that the Court issue an Order, substantially in the form\n\nattached hereto, setting a hearing on the Contempt Motion, ordering notice of such hearing as set\n\nforth in the attached Order, and ordering such other and further relief as is just and proper.\n\nDated: October 7, 2022 LUC A. DESPINS,\n\nNew Haven, Connecticut CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE\n\nBy: */s/ Patrick R. Linsey*\n\nDouglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 dskalka@npmlaw.com, plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n*and*\n\nNicholas A. Bassett (admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n*and*\n\nAvram E. Luft (admitted *pro hac vice*) Douglass Barron (admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6079 aviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n*Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*\n\n### **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x                                |       |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|-------|\n| In re:                                                      | :<br>:<br>Chapter 11             |       |\n| HO WAN KWOK,                                                | :<br>:<br>Case No. 22-50073<br>: | (JAM) |\n| Debtor.                                                     | :<br>:                           |       |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x                                |       |\n\n#### **ORDER SCHEDULING EXPEDITED HEARING**\n\nThe Court having considered the motion (the \"Motion to Expedite\") seeking an expedited hearing on the *Motion of Chapter 11 Trustee for Entry of Order Holding Debtor in Civil Contempt for Failure to Comply with Corporate Governance Order* [Docket No. 913] (the \"Contempt Motion\"); 1 and good cause appearing, it is hereby\n\n**ORDERED,** that a hearing on the Contempt Motion shall be held on **October \\_\\_, 2022, at \\_:00 \\_.m. (prevailing Eastern Time)** at the United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Connecticut, Bridgeport Division, 915 Lafayette Boulevard, Room 123, Bridgeport, CT 06604 (the \"Hearing\"); and it is further\n\n**ORDERED,** that the deadline to object to the Contempt Motion shall be **\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ at \\_\\_:\\_\\_ \\_.m.**; and it is further\n\n**ORDERED,** that a copy of this Order, along with the Contempt Motion and any attachments thereto, shall be served upon all parties to the above-captioned chapter 11 case qualified to receive electronic notice via the Court's CM/ECF service, as well as the Debtor, the Committee, and the United States Trustee, on or before October \\_\\_, 2022, and the Trustee shall\n\n<sup>1</sup> Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Order have the meanings set forth in the Motion to Expedite.\n\nfile a certificate of service in advance of the Hearing.\n\n# **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x           |                            |\n|-------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|----------------------------|\n| In re:                                                      | :<br>:      | Chapter 11                 |\n| HO WAN KWOK,                                                | :<br>:<br>: | Case No. 22-50073<br>(JAM) |\n| Debtor.                                                     | :<br>:      |                            |\n| ----------------------------------------------------------- | x           |                            |\n\n# **CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**\n\nThe undersigned hereby certifies that on October 7, 2022, the foregoing Motion was electronically filed. Notice of this filing was sent by e-mail to all parties to the above-captioned chapter 11 case by operation of the Court's electronic filing (\"CM/ECF\") system or by mail to anyone unable to accept electronic filing as indicated on the Notice of Electronic Filing.<sup>1</sup> Parties may access this filing through the Court's CM/ECF system.\n\nDated: October 7, 2022 New Haven, Connecticut\n\n> By: */s/ Patrick R. Linsey* Douglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847\n\ndskalka@npmlaw.com plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n<sup>1</sup> To the extent that the foregoing was filed outside regular business hours, service by mail on recipients unable or not qualified to accept electronic notice was made on the next business day.\n\n*and*\n\nNicholas A. Bassett (admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n*and*\n\nAvram E. Luft (admitted *pro hac vice*) Douglass Barron (admitted *pro hac vice*) PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6079 aviluft@paulhastings.com douglassbarron@paulhastings.com\n\n*Counsel for the Chapter 11 Trustee*","body_zh":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n\n关于：\n第 11 章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n案号 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。1\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n依据《破产程序规则》第 9006(c)(1) 条请求就第 11 章受托人关于作出因未遵守公司治理裁定而裁定债务人构成民事藐视法庭的裁定的动议进行加急听证（如有）的动议\n\n第 11 章受托人 Luc A. Despins（下称「受托人」），经由其下述签字律师，依据《联邦破产程序规则》（下称「《破产程序规则》」）第 9006(c)(1) 条，特此向本法院提出动议（下称「加急动议」），请求作出裁定安排一次加急听证（如有），以审议并裁决《第 11 章受托人关于作出因未遵守公司治理裁定而裁定债务人构成民事藐视法庭的裁定的动议》[Docket No. 913]（下称「藐视法庭动议」）。2 为支持其加急动议，受托人谨陈述如下：\n管辖权、审理地及法定依据\n\n1. 依据 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 及 1334 以及美国康涅狄格区联邦地区法院的常规移送裁定（经修订），美国康涅狄格区联邦破产法院（下称「本法院」）对本事项拥有管辖权。\n\n1 尽管债务人的法定姓名为 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵），但其亦被称为 Guo Wengui、Miles Guo 和 Miles Kwok，以及诸多其他别名。债务人纳税人识别号的后四位数字为 9595。\n\n2 本文中使用但未另作定义的首字母大写术语具有藐视法庭动议中所规定的含义。\n\n藐视法庭动议（包括与其相关的本加急动议）属于 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) 含义范围内的核心诉讼程序。\n\n2. 依据 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 及 1409，本司法管辖区的审理地是正当的。\n\n3. 本加急动议所寻求救济的依据为《破产程序规则》第 9006(c)(1) 条。\n背景\n\n4. 2022 年 2 月 15 日（下称「申请日」），债务人向本法院提交了依据《破产法典》第 11 章寻求救济的自愿申请。\n\n5. 2022 年 3 月 21 日，美国受托人（United States Trustee）在债务人的第 11 章案件（下称「第 11 章案件」）中指定了无担保债权人官方委员会（下称「委员会」）。第 11 章案件中未指定任何调查员。\n\n6. 2022 年 6 月 15 日，本法院作出了决定及裁定备忘录 [ECF No. 465]（下称「受托人裁定」），指示美国受托人在第 11 章案件中指定一名第 11 章受托人。依据受托人裁定，美国受托人选定 Luc A. Despins 担任受托人。\n\n7. 2022 年 7 月 8 日，本法院作出裁定，批准指定 Luc A. Despins 为第 11 章案件的受托人 [ECF No. 523]（下称「指定裁定」）。\n\n8. 2022 年 7 月 23 日，受托人提交了《第 11 章受托人依据〈破产法典〉第 363、541、1108 和 105 条请求作出裁定以 (A) 确认第 11 章受托人享有债务人在债务人控制实体中的全部经济权利，(B) 授权第 11 章受托人代表破产财产在任何外国采取行动，并给予相关救济的动议》[Docket No. 598]（下称「公司治理权利动议」）。\n\n9. 正如公司治理权利动议中所详述，受托人之所以寻求此类救济，是因为债务人已表现出蔑视法院裁定的倾向，表明债务人及相关人员（无论是个人行事还是通过债务人控制实体行事）可能会试图利用有关受托人权利的任何模糊之处或误解，以阻挠受托人识别和追回破产财产的努力。3\n\n10. 2022 年 8 月 10 日，本法院批准了公司治理权利动议，并作出了《依据〈破产法典〉第 363、521、541、1108 和 105 条 (A) 确认第 11 章受托人享有债务人在债务人控制实体中的全部经济和公司治理权利，(B) 授权第 11 章受托人代表破产财产在任何外国采取行动，以及 (C) 给予相关救济的裁定》[Docket No. 761]（下称「公司治理权利裁定」）。\n\n11. 公司治理权利裁定确认受托人享有债务人就所有债务人控制实体拥有的全部经济和公司治理权利，此外还指示债务人「配合受托人以使受托人能够履行其职责」并「向受托人交出所有破产财产以及任何记录信息，包括但不限于与破产财产相关的账簿、文件、记录和文件」。4 上述条款具有完全效力。\n藐视法庭动议5\n\n12. 通过藐视法庭动议，受托人请求本法院裁定债务人构成民事藐视法庭，原因是债务人故意未能且拒绝遵守公司\n\n3 公司治理权利动议第 1 段\n\n4 公司治理权利裁定第 2、3 段。\n\n5 以下关于藐视法庭动议中寻求救济的概述，其全部内容均以藐视法庭动议本身为准。\n\n治理权利裁定中涉及 Ace Decade Holdings Limited（下称「Ace Decade」）以及间接涉及 Ace Decade 的全资子公司 Dawn State Limited（下称「Dawn State」）的相关规定。\n\n13. 正如藐视法庭动议中所详述，债务人已在法庭文件中和/或经宣誓后多次承认，其拥有 Ace Decade，并间接拥有 Ace Decade 的全资子公司 Dawn State Limited（下称「Dawn State」）。\n\n14. 受托人已明确要求债务人遵守公司治理权利裁定中涉及 Ace Decade 和 Dawn State 的规定——从三十八天前开始。2022 年 8 月 31 日，受托人致函债务人律师（下称「2022 年 8 月 31 日信函」），要求债务人促使其在 Ace Decade 的股份最迟于 2022 年 9 月 6 日转让给受托人。6 迄今为止，债务人尚未将 Ace Decade 的股份转让给受托人，债务人也未提供任何公司文件或任何证明债务人不是 Ace Decade 拥有者的证据。\n\n15. 受托人亦在本法院先前的状况通报会上提出了债务人未遵守规定的问题。在拖延了四周之后，债务人律师才对 2022 年 8 月 31 日信函作出回应，在 2022 年 9 月 7 日的状况通报会上声称债务人据称并不拥有 Ace Decade，且其在第 341 条会议上相反的承认据称是一系列翻译错误所致。债务人律师并未回应债务人承认其拥有 Ace Decade 的其他书面供认。正如藐视法庭动议中所述，债务人最新的这套另类事实令人难以置信。\n\n16. 为了强制执行公司治理权利裁定，并反对债务人企图改写历史（包括其本人就其所知事实所作的证言）的最新举动，\n\n6 8 月 31 日的信函还要求股份转让文书及相关董事决议的格式应与转让 Genever (BVI) 股份的相关对应文件格式相同（该等文件已作为附件 A 附于公司治理权利裁定）。\n\n受托人于 2022 年 10 月 4 日提交了藐视法庭动议。藐视法庭动议请求本法院裁定债务人构成藐视法庭，施加适当的制裁以迫使债务人遵守公司治理权利裁定，并裁定债务人在本第 11 章案件中应被禁止反言（judicially estopped）主张其不拥有 Ace Decade。\n所请求的救济\n\n17. 《破产程序规则》第 9006(c)(1) 条规定，经动议提出请求并在说明正当理由后，本法院可缩短通知期限。本案存在以加急方式审议和裁决藐视法庭动议的正当理由。\n\n18. 本法院极有必要迅速对藐视法庭动议作出裁判，以要求债务人遵守公司治理权利裁定，允许受托人继续就涉及这些资产的事项进行调查和破产财产管理，并确保债务人不会从其故意蔑视法院裁定的行为中获益（哪怕仅仅是通过拖延）。鉴于该事项已悬而未决超过一个月，加急举行藐视法庭动议的听证不会对债务人造成任何不利益。\n\n19. 受托人请求将藐视法庭动议的听证安排在 2022 年 10 月 24 日当周，具体时间由法院方便确定。\n\n20. 受托人进一步请求本法院指示：藐视法庭动议的通知以及本法院批准本加急动议并安排听证的裁定，应送达在第 11 章案件中出庭且有资格通过本法院 CM/ECF 系统接收电子通知的所有利害关系方，以及债务人、委员会和美国受托人；并且本法院应在听证会前为债务人就藐视法庭动议提出异议设定一个适当的截止期限。\n为此，受托人请求本法院作出实质上符合\n\n本动议所附格式的裁定，安排对藐视法庭动议的听证，按所附裁定\n\n规定的方式命令发出该听证的通知，并裁定给予其他及进一步公正且适当的救济。\n\n日期：2022 年 10 月 7 日 LUC A. DESPINS，\n\n康涅狄格州纽黑文 第 11 章受托人\n\n签署人：/s/ Patrick R. Linsey\n\nDouglas S. Skalka (ct00616) Patrick R. Linsey (ct29437) NEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C. 195 Church Street, 13th Floor New Haven, Connecticut 06510 (203) 781-2847 dskalka@npmlaw.com, plinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n以及\n\nNicholas A. Bassett（特许出庭律师，admitted pro hac vice） PAUL HASTINGS LLP 2050 M Street NW Washington, D.C., 20036 (202) 551-1902 nicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n以及\n\nAvram E. Luft（特许出庭律师，admitted pro hac vice） Douglass Barron（特许出庭律师，admitted pro hac vice） PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 (212) 318-6079 aviluft@paulhastings.com\n\n第 11 章受托人的法律顾问\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n\n关于：\n第 11 章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n案号 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n安排加急听证的裁定\n\n经本法院审议请求就《第 11 章受托人关于作出因未遵守公司治理裁定而裁定债务人构成民事藐视法庭的裁定的动议》[Docket No. 913]（下称「藐视法庭动议」）进行加急听证的动议（下称「加急动议」）；1 且有充分正当理由，特此\n\n裁定：藐视法庭动议的听证应于 2022 年 10 月 ___ 日上午/下午 ___:___（以适用东部时间为准）在康涅狄格区联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院举行，地址为 915 Lafayette Boulevard, Room 123, Bridgeport, CT 06604（下称「听证会」）；并且进一步\n\n裁定：对藐视法庭动议提出异议的截止期限应为 ________ 上午/下午 __:__；并且进一步\n\n裁定：本裁定的副本连同藐视法庭动议及其任何附件，应在 2022 年 10 月 ___ 日或之前送达上述标题项下第 11 章案件中有资格通过法院 CM/ECF 系统接收电子通知的所有各方，以及债务人、委员会和美国受托人，且受托人应\n\n1 本裁定中使用但未另作定义的首字母大写术语具有加急动议中所规定的含义。\n\n在听证会前提交一份送达证明。\nUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n\n关于：\n第 11 章\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n案号 22-50073 (JAM)\n债务人。\n\n----------------------------------------------------------- x\n送达证书\n\n下列签署人特此证明，于 2022年10月7日，上述动议已通过电子方式归档。此归档通知已通过法院的电子归档（“CM/ECF”）系统以电子邮件形式发送给上述标题所列第11章案件的所有当事人，或按照电子归档通知上的注明，以邮寄方式发送给无法接收电子归档的任何人。1 当事人可通过法院的 CM/ECF 系统查阅本归档文件。\n\n日期：2022年10月7日 康涅狄格州纽黑文（New Haven, Connecticut）\n\n签署人：/s/ Patrick R. Linsey（帕特里克·R·林赛）\nDouglas S. Skalka（道格拉斯·S·斯卡尔卡）(ct00616)\nPatrick R. Linsey（ct29437）\nNEUBERT, PEPE & MONTEITH, P.C.\n195 Church Street, 13th Floor\nNew Haven, Connecticut 06510\n(203) 781-2847\n\ndskalka@npmlaw.com\nplinsey@npmlaw.com\n\n1 若上述文件系在正常营业时间之外归档，则对无法或不具备资格接收电子通知的接收人的邮寄送达将在下一个营业日进行。\n\n以及\n\nNicholas A. Bassett（尼古拉斯·A·巴塞特）（特许出庭（pro hac vice））\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP（普衡律师事务所）\n2050 M Street NW\nWashington, D.C., 20036\n(202) 551-1902\nnicholasbassett@paulhastings.com\n\n以及\n\nAvram E. Luft（阿夫拉姆·E·卢夫特）（特许出庭（pro hac vice））\nDouglass Barron（道格拉斯·巴伦）（特许出庭（pro hac vice））\nPAUL HASTINGS LLP（普衡律师事务所）\n200 Park Avenue\nNew York, New York 10166\n(212) 318-6079\naviluft@paulhastings.com\ndouglassbarron@paulhastings.com\n\n第11章受托人律师","key_entities":["Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Despins","Paul Hastings","Guo","Je","Miles Guo"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":465,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":523,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":2146,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 13:13:01"}