{"id":"court_ctb_97_0","court":"CTB","case_no":"22-50073","doc_number":97,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2022-03-01","title":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION In re:","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\nIn re:\n\nHO WAN KWOK,\n\nDebtor.\n\n## Case No. 22-50073 (JAM)\n\nChapter 11\n\n## **CREDITOR LOGAN CHENG'S REPLY TO OBJECTION TO MOTION TO STAY**\n\nCreditor Logan Cheng, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby replies to Debtor's Objection [ECF No. 83] to the Motion of Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. for Entry of an Order Confirming the Inapplicability of the Automatic Stay or, in the Alternative, Relief from the Automatic Stay Pursuant to Section 362(d)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, dated March 1, 2022 [ECF No. 57] (the \"PAX Motion\"), filed by Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. (\"PAX\"), and states as follows:\n\n1. Creditor joins the Statement of Creditors Rui Ma and Zheng Wu in Qualified Support of Relief Requested by Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. [ECF No. 84].\n\n2. Creditor concurs that Debtor's contumacious misconduct must be the subject of redress, and Creditor fully supports the relief sought by PAX, with the proposed modifications to PAX's proposed order submitted by Creditors Ma and Wu.\n\n3. Debtor's assets must be properly marshalled, and the use of shell companies cannot be countenanced. For example, in Debtor's *Global Notes* [ECF No. 77], on page 12 thereof, Debtor acknowledges that Eastern Profit Corporation Limited (\"Eastern Profit\") was determined to be \"in essence, a shell corporation for\" the Debtor.1 Yet, Debtor, through that very same Eastern Profit entity, is engaged in collections litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, against its own judgment debtor, spending what must be presumed to be assets of\n\n<sup>1</sup> Oddly, Debtor states he is \"schedul[ing] this action\", *i.e*., the action against Strategic Vision in the Southern District of New York, but the S.D. N.Y. action is actually omitted from the Schedule in response to SOFA Question 9, and the E.D. Virginia collections litigation is omitted as well.\n\nDebtor's Estate, paying the same law firm, Schulman Bhattacharya, LLC, that is listed as a sixfigure creditor in Debtor's schedules. *See Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US, LLC,*  Case No. 1:21-mc-00027-EDA-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 26, 2021). That collections litigation is seemingly ongoing, with counsel for Strategic Vision US appearing on February 25, 2022, after the Petition was filed in this matter, which must be presumed to be in relation to post-judgment discovery matters.\n\nWHEREFORE Creditor Logan Cheng respectfully requests this Honorable Court allow the PAX Motion, as modified.\n\nDated: March 18, 2022. Respectfully submitted,\n\n/s/ Jay M. Wolman\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nJay M. Wolman – ct29129 of Randazza Legal Group, PLLC 100 Pearl Street, 14th Floor Hartford, CT 06103 P: 702-420-2001 F: 305-437-7662 ecf@randazza.com\n\n*Counsel for Creditor Logan Cheng f/k/a Shui-Yuan Cheng*\n\n## **CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE**\n\nI HEREBY CERTIFY that on March 18, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I further certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document is being served via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.\n\n> /s/ Jay M. Woman ct29129 Jay M. Wolman","body_zh":"UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION（美国康涅狄格区联邦破产法院布里奇波特分院）\n\n关于：\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵），\n\n债务人。\n案号：22-50073 (JAM)\n\n第11章\n债权人 LOGAN CHENG 对中止动议异议的回复\n\n债权人 Logan Cheng（程洛根）由下述署名律师代表，特此对债务人针对 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.（太盟亚洲机会基金有限公司，简称“PAX”）于 2022年3月1日 提交的《Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. 请求作出确认自动中止不适用或备选依破产法第 362(d)(2) 条免除自动中止命令的动议》[ECF No. 57]（即“PAX 动议”）所提出的《异议》[ECF No. 83] 作出回复，并陈述如下：\n\n1. 债权人加入《债权人 Rui Ma（马锐）与 Zheng Wu（吴征）关于有保留地支持 Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. 所请求救济的声明》[ECF No. 84]。\n\n2. 债权人一致认同债务人抗拒司法的严重不当行为必须予以纠正，且债权人完全支持 PAX 所请求的救济，以及债权人马某和吴某针对 PAX 拟定裁定书所提交的修改建议。\n\n3. 债务人的资产必须妥善清理，利用空壳公司的行为绝不能被容许。例如，在债务人的《全局说明》[ECF No. 77] 第 12 页中，债务人承认 Eastern Profit Corporation Limited（东利有限公司，简称“Eastern Profit”）已被认定为“实质上是债务人的空壳公司”1。然而，债务人正通过完全相同的 Eastern Profit 实体，在 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia（弗吉尼亚东区联邦地区法院）对其自身的判决债务人进行催收诉讼，花费着必然被推定为属于\n\n1 奇怪的是，债务人声称其正在“将本案列入财产目录”，即针对 Southern District of New York（纽约南区）的 Strategic Vision 提起的诉讼，但针对纽约南区的诉讼实际上并未在回答 SOFA 第 9 问的财产目录中列出，而弗吉尼亚东区的催收诉讼也同样被遗漏。\n\n债务人破产财产的资产，向同一家在债务人财产目录中被列为六位数金额债权人的律师事务所 Schulman Bhattacharya, LLC 支付费用。参见 Eastern Profit Corp. Ltd. v. Strategic Vision US, LLC 案，案号 1:21-mc-00027-EDA-TCB（弗吉尼亚东区，2021年11月26日 提起）。该催收诉讼似乎仍在进行中，Strategic Vision US 的代理律师在针对本案的破产申请提交之后，于 2022年2月25日 出庭，这必然被推定为与判决后证据开示事项相关。\n\n基于上述理由，债权人 Logan Cheng 谨请求本尊敬的法院批准修改后的 PAX 动议。\n\n日期：2022年3月18日。谨此提交，\n\n/s/ Jay M. Wolman_________________\n\nJay M. Wolman – ct29129，隶属于 Randazza Legal Group, PLLC\n100 Pearl Street, 14th Floor Hartford, CT 06103\n电话：702-420-2001 传真：305-437-7662 邮箱：ecf@randazza.com\n\n债权人 Logan Cheng（曾用名 Shui-Yuan Cheng，程水源）之代理律师\n送达证明\n\n本人特此证明，于 2022年3月18日，本人使用 CM/ECF 系统向法院书记官以电子方式提交了上述文件。本人进一步证明，上述文件的真实正确副本正通过 CM/ECF 生成的电子送达通知书发送进行送达。\n\n/s/ Jay M. Woman ct29129 Jay M. Wolman","key_entities":["Je","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":57,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":77,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":83,"court":"CTB"},{"doc_number":84,"court":"CTB"}],"word_count":507,"status":"published","published_at":"2022-03-01 00:00:00","created_at":"2022-03-01","updated_at":"2026-08-23 12:18:24"}