{"id":"court_sdny_199_5","court":"SDNY","case_no":"23-cr-00118","doc_number":199,"sub_number":5,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2023-12-15","title":"Exhibit 5 ![](_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg)","summary_zh":"Yanping Wang 防卫团队对检方的正式信函 —— 美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok 案，SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #199（2023-07-31 发出）。Wang 的律师依照《刑事诉讼规则》第 7(f) 条要求政府提供起诉特别说明，并主张海量发现文件妨碍有效防卫准备，请求法庭命令政府缩小发现范围。","summary_en":"Formal discovery and bill of particulars demand from Yanping Wang's defense team to prosecutors — United States v. Ho Wan Kwok, SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #199 (sent 2023-07-31). Defense counsel invoke Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(f) to demand bill of particulars and contend that voluminous discovery materials impede adequate trial preparation, requesting the court order narrowing of discovery scope.","body_en":"# Exhibit 5\n\n![](_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg)\n\n147 WEST 25TH STREET, 12TH FLOOR\nNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10001\nCHAUDHRYLAW.COM\n\nJuly 31, 2023\n\n#### *Via* **Email**\n\nJuliana Newcomb Murray, Esq. Ryan B. Finkel, Esq. Micah Festa Fergenson, Esq. Assistant United States Attorneys United States Attorney's Office Southern District of New York 1 Saint Andrews Plaza New York, NY 10007\n\n## *Re: United States v. Yanping Wang***, S1 1:23-cr-00118-AT**\n\nDear Messrs. Murray, Finkel, and Fergenson:\n\nAs you know, along with Lipman Law PLLC, we represent Ms. Yanping Wang (\"Ms. Wang\") in the above-referenced matter. On behalf of Ms. Wang, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 7(f), we make the following initial demand for a bill of particulars. Please promptly provide the requested particulars to facilitate the filing of appropriate motions. Please advise us promptly and with specificity should you decline to make any of the requested particulars available.\n\nAdditionally, considering the staggering volume of discovery in this case, we request that you narrow the scope of discovery to ensure a fair and efficient trial. It has become evident that the government's disclosure will inundate us with an avalanche of documents, making it nearly impossible to identify the germane and relevant evidence necessary for our defense. As the cases discussed below explain, this shall not fulfill the government's Rule 16 obligations.\n\nIn voluminous discovery cases, courts have recognized that the government does not fulfill its obligations under Rule 16 by burying \"the defense under an avalanche of documentary and electronic outpourings, [thus rendering] the defense incapable of distilling that which is germane and relevant to the impending trial.\" *United States v. Washington*, 819 F.Supp.358, 368 (D. Vt. 1993) (court inclined to order particularization of evidence the government intends to use at trial provided the defendants could make a showing that they are overwhelmed by voluminous discovery materials). When the government has failed to provide the defense with particulars and has essentially buried the defendants in mounds of documents, courts have narrowed down\n\nthe charges, reasoning that \"[t]he Government did not fulfill its obligation merely by providing mountains of documents to defense counsel.\" *United States v. Bortnovsky*, 820 F.2d 572, 575 (2d Cir. 1987); *United States v. Savin*, No. 00-Cr.45-RWS, 2001 WL 243533 \\*3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2001). Similarly, in *United States v. Nachamie*, 91 F.Supp.2d 565 (S.D.N.Y.2000), a bill of particulars was ordered where the defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit Medicare fraud, and the government \"produced over 200,000 pieces of paper in hundreds of boxes and files, relating to 2,000 Medicare claims.\" *Id*. at 571. The court noted that the government had \"not yet informed the defendants which of these claims were false and in what way they were false,\" *Id*. at 571, and, relying on *Bortnovsky,* ordered a bill of particulars specifying the names of unindicted co-conspirators, the identity and details of each and every allegedly false claim submitted and/or filed as part of the conspiracy, and the identity and details of the allegedly false documents used in the conspiracy.\" *Id.* at 572–75.\n\nTherefore, in light of the overwhelming volume of discovery materials in this case and the potential adverse impact on our ability to adequately prepare a defense, we ask you to narrow down the scope of discovery. We seek a fair and efficient trial; providing us with the requested particulars and conducting particularization of the voluminous evidence will enable us to identify the pertinent evidence essential to represent our client effectively.\n\n## **Re: Count One (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, Securities Fraud, Bank Fraud, and Money Laundering)**\n\n# **A. Particulars Regarding Ms. Wang's Allegedly False, Misleading, and/or Fraudulent Pretenses, Representations, Promises, and/or Material Omissions**\n\n- 1. Regarding Paragraphs 1-32:\n\t- a. Please identify each and every false or fraudulent pretense employed by Ms. Wang.\n\t\t- i. For each such pretense, explain the nature of the pretense and why it was deceptive, and identify what was false or fraudulent about it.\n\t- b. Please identify each and every false or fraudulent pretense employed by others but attributable to Ms. Wang.\n\t\t- i. For each such pretense, identify the person or persons who employed it and explain why it is attributable to Ms. Wang.\n\t\t- ii. For each such pretense, explain the nature of the pretense and why it was deceptive, and identify what was false or fraudulent about it.\n\n- c. Please identify each and every statement, representation, promise, and/or material omission (collectively, \"Statement\" or \"Statements\") made by Ms. Wang or attributable to her.\n\t- i. For every Statement made by or attributable to Ms. Wang that the government contends constitutes a false, misleading, and/or fraudulent representation, or promise, and/or contains a material omission, indicate whether the government alleges that the Statement was \"false,\" \"misleading,\" \"fraudulent,\" a \"representation,\" a \"promise,\" and/or contained a \"material omission.\"\n\t- ii. For each such Statement attributable to Ms. Wang, identify the person or persons who made the relevant Statement and explain why any such statement is attributable to Ms. Wang.\n\t- iii. For each Statement identified in response to Paragraph A.1.c.i above, please indicate what was false about it.\n\t- iv. For each Statement identified in response to Paragraph A.1.c.i above that contained a material omission, please identify the Statement, and explain what was omitted that made the Statement false or misleading in light of the relevant circumstances.\n\n#### **B. Particulars Regarding Solicitation of Investments by Ms. Wang**\n\n- 1. Regarding Paragraph 2:\n\t- a. With respect to the government's allegation that Ms. Wang took advantage of Mr. Ho Wan Kwok's prolific online presence and hundreds of thousands of online followers to solicit investments in various entities and programs by promising outsized financial returns and other benefits:\n\t\t- i. Please specify all the entities and programs with which Ms. Wang is alleged to have been involved in soliciting investments, by providing the names of each entity or program.\n\t\t- ii. For each entity or program for which Ms. Wang is alleged to have solicited investments, please identify the specific Statement that she made (or that are attributable to her) to potential investors regarding benefits to investors, including the expected financial returns or other benefits.\n\n- iii. For each specific Statement identified in response to Paragraph B.1.a.ii above attributable to Ms. Wang, please identify the person or persons who made the relevant Statement and explain why any such Statement is attributable to Ms. Wang.\n- iv. With regard to the specific Statements identified in response to Paragraph B.1.a.ii above, please specify what is false, fraudulent, or misleading about each Statement.\n- 2. Regarding Paragraph 13:\n\n- a. With respect to the government's allegation that Ms. Wang, along with other defendants, fraudulently obtained over \\$400 million in victim funds through an illegal private stock offering related to the GTV Private Placement, please specify:\n\t- i. The specific role(s) that Ms. Wang is alleged to have played in the GTV Private Placement.\n\t- ii. The specific Statements made by (or attributable to) Ms. Wang, either directly or indirectly, in connection with the GTV Private Placement.\n\t- iii. For each Statement identified in response to Paragraph B.2.a.ii above attributable to Ms. Wang, please identify the person or persons who made the relevant Statement and explain why any such statement is attributable to Ms. Wang.\n\t- iv. With regard to the specific Statements in response to Paragraph B.2.a.ii above, please specify what is false, fraudulent, or misleading about each Statement.\n\t- v. Please describe the specific actions taken by Ms. Wang, either directly or indirectly, in furtherance of the GTV Private Placement.\n\n#### **C. Particulars Regarding Misappropriation of Investments by Ms. Wang**\n\n- 1. Regarding Paragraph 13(h):\n\t- a. With respect to the government's allegation that Ms. Wang and her coconspirators misappropriated approximately \\$100 million raised from investors in the GTV Private Placement and directed those funds to be\n\n> placed with a high-risk hedge fund for the benefit of Saraca Media Group, Inc. (\"Saraca\") and its ultimate beneficial owner:\n\n- i. Please provide details regarding the specific actions taken by Ms. Wang to facilitate the alleged misappropriation.\n- 2. Regarding Paragraph 32(b):\n\n- a. With respect to the government's allegation that Ms. Wang authorized a wire transfer of \\$100 million from Saraca to Fund-1 while located in the Southern District of New York on or about June 5, 2020:\n\t- i. Please identify Fund-1.\n\t- ii. Please clarify the specific role played by Ms. Wang in authorizing the wire transfer from Saraca to Fund-1.\n\t- iii. Please specify any communications, instructions, or directions provided by Ms. Wang in relation to the wire transfer.\n\n#### **D. Particulars Regarding Defrauding of Financial Institutions**\n\n- 1. Regarding Paragraph 29:\n\t- a. With respect to the government's allegation that Ms. Wang, along with others, knowingly executed and attempted to execute a scheme to defraud a financial institution by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises:\n\t\t- i. Please specify the financial institution(s) that are referenced in the alleged scheme to defraud, by providing the name(s) of the institution(s).\n\t\t- ii. For each financial institution identified in response to Paragraph D.1.a.i above, please provide specific details regarding the scheme and artifice to defraud said financial institution, including the nature of the false pretenses, representations, and promises made by Ms. Wang.\n\t\t- iii. For each financial institution identified in response to Paragraph D.1.a.i above, please provide details regarding the sums of money, funds, credits, assets, securities, or other property that were allegedly obtained by means of the scheme.\n\n- iv. For each financial institution identified in response to Paragraph D.1.a.i above, please specify the false and fraudulent pretenses and Statements made by (or attributable to) Ms. Wang to mislead the financial institutions.\n- v. For each specific false and fraudulent pretense and Statement specified in response to Paragraph D.1.a.iv above attributable to Ms. Wang, please identify the person or persons who made the relevant false and fraudulent pretenses and Statements and explain why any such pretense or Statement is attributable to Ms. Wang.\n- vi. With regard to the specific false and fraudulent pretenses and Statements identified in response to Paragraph D.1.a.iv above, please specify what is false, fraudulent, or misleading about each Statement.\n\n#### **Re: Count Two (Wire Fraud – GTV Private Placement)**\n\n- 1. Regarding Paragraph 34:\n\t- a. With respect to the government's allegations regarding Ms. Wang's involvement in a scheme to defraud involving the GTV Private Placement through false statements and misrepresentations, electronic communications, and monetary transfers:\n\t\t- i. Please provide specific details regarding the scheme and artifice to defraud, including the nature of the false pretenses, representations, and promises allegedly made by Ms. Wang.\n\t\t- ii. Please specify the tactics, strategies, or methods allegedly employed by Ms. Wang to deceive and defraud victims in relation to the GTV Private Placement scheme.\n\t\t- iii. Please specify the false Statements allegedly made by (or attributable to) Ms. Wang to potential victims to obtain money fraudulently as part of the GTV Private Placement.\n\t\t- iv. For each specific false Statement specified in response to Paragraph 1.a.i. above attributable to Ms. Wang, please identify the person or persons who made the relevant Statements, and explain why any such Statement is attributable to Ms. Wang.\n\n- v. With regard to each specific false Statement specified in response to Paragraph A.1.c., please specify what is false, fraudulent, or misleading about each Statement.\n- b. Please provide details regarding the alleged monetary transfers to and from the Southern District of New York and elsewhere that were part of the scheme, including the parties involved, the origin and destination of each transfer (as well as any intermediate entities through which the transfers may have been funneled), the amounts transferred, and the purpose of those transfers.\n\n#### **Re: Count Three (Securities Fraud - GTV Private Placement)**\n\n- 1. Regarding Paragraph 36:\n\t- a. With respect to the government's allegation that Ms. Wang, along with others, wilfully and knowingly employed manipulative and deceptive practices in connection with the purchase and sale of securities and that Ms. Wang and others conducted the GTV Private Placement to sell GTV stock and obtain money from victims through false statements and misrepresentations, which scheme was furthered through electronic communications and monetary transfers to and from the Southern District of New York and elsewhere:\n\t\t- i. Please provide specific details regarding the manipulative and deceptive device and contrivance allegedly employed by Ms. Wang.\n\t\t- ii. Please identify the untrue Statements of material fact allegedly made by (or attributable to) Ms. Wang in connection with the GTV Private Placement.\n\t\t\t- a. For each of the untrue Statements of material fact specified in response to Paragraph 1.a.ii above attributable to Ms. Wang, please identify the person or persons who made the relevant false Statement, and explain why any such Statement is attributable to Ms. Wang.\n\t\t\t- b. With regard to each of the untrue Statements of material fact specified in response to Paragraph 1.a.ii above, please specify what is false, fraudulent, or misleading about each Statement.\n\n- c. Please identify in what country, city, and state each relevant securities transaction took place, and please specify the connection of each such transaction to the Southern District of New York.\n- b. Please provide details regarding the alleged monetary transfers to and from the Southern District of New York and elsewhere that were part of the scheme, including the parties involved, the origin and destination of each transfer (as well as any intermediate entities through which the transfers may have been funneled), the amounts transferred, and the purpose of those transfers.\n\n#### **Re: Count Eleven (Unlawful Monetary Transactions)**\n\n- 1. Regarding Paragraph 52:\n\t- a. With respect to the government's allegation that Ms. Wang, along with others, knowingly engaged and attempted to engage in a monetary transaction using criminally derived property:\n\t\t- i. Please provide specific details regarding the monetary transaction, including the date, method, and location of the transaction, the parties involved, the amount of money transferred, and the purpose or intended outcome of the transaction.\n\t\t- ii. Please identify the specific unlawful activity from which the property involved in the transaction was derived, and please provide details regarding how it was obtained or generated.\n\nPlease provide these particulars to enable the defense to fully understand and respond to the government's allegations.\n\nThank you for your attention to these requests.\n\nVery truly yours,\n\nPriya Chaudhry\n\nCc: Alex Lipman, Esq. (via email)","body_zh":"证物 5\n\n147 WEST 25TH STREET, 12TH FLOOR\nNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10001\nCHAUDHRYLAW.COM\n\n2023年7月31日\n\n通过电子邮件发送\n\nJuliana Newcomb Murray 律师、Ryan B. Finkel 律师、Micah Festa Fergenson 律师，美国助理检察官，United States Attorney's Office（美国联邦检察官办公室）Southern District of New York（纽约南区），1 Saint Andrews Plaza, New York, NY 10007\n\n关于：United States v. Yanping Wang（美国诉王雁平案），S1 1:23-cr-00118-AT\n\n尊敬的 Murray、Finkel 和 Fergenson 检察官：\n\n正如各位所知，我们与 Lipman Law PLLC 共同代表上述案件中的 Yanping Wang（王雁平）女士（下称“王女士”）。代表王女士，并依据《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 7(f) 条，我们提出以下关于具体罪状说明书的初步要求。请及时提供所要求的具体罪状说明，以便我们提起适当的动议。如果您方拒绝提供所要求的任何具体罪状说明，请及时并具体地告知我们。\n\n此外，考虑到本案中开示证据的体量极其庞大，我们请求您方缩小证据开示的范围，以确保审理的公正与高效。显而易见，政府方面的披露将使我们被雪崩般的文件所淹没，导致我们几乎无法确定为辩护所必需的直接相关及实质性证据。正如以下所讨论的判例所阐释的，这无法履行政府在第 16 条下的义务。\n\n在开示证据体量庞大的案件中，法院已确认，政府通过将“辩方埋在如雪崩般倾泻而出的书证和电子证据之下，［从而使得］辩方无法提炼出与即将进行的审理直接相关且实质性的内容”，并不能履行其在第 16 条下的义务。见 United States v. Washington 案，819 F.Supp.358, 368 (D. Vt. 1993)（法院倾向于命令对政府打算在审判中使用的证据予以具体化，前提是被告能够证明其已被海量的开示证据材料所压垮）。当政府未能向辩方提供具体罪状说明，且实质上将被告埋在堆积如山的文件中时，法院缩小了\n\n控罪范围，其理由是“政府仅仅向辩护律师提供堆积如山的文件，并未履行其义务。”见 United States v. Bortnovsky 案，820 F.2d 572, 575 (2d Cir. 1987)；United States v. Savin 案，案号 00-Cr.45-RWS，2001 WL 243533 *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2001)。同样，在 United States v. Nachamie 案，91 F.Supp.2d 565 (S.D.N.Y.2000) 中，被告被指控合谋进行联邦医疗保险欺诈，且政府“在数百个箱子和卷宗中出示了超过 200,000 份与 2,000 项医疗保险申领相关的文件”，法院在此案中下达了具体罪状说明书的命令。同上，第 571 页。法院指出，政府“尚未告知被告这些申领中哪些是虚假的，以及它们以何种方式构成虚假”，同上，第 571 页，并基于 Bortnovsky 案，命令出具一份具体罪状说明书，明确“未被起诉的共谋者的姓名、作为共谋一部分所提交和/或申报的每一项据称虚假申领的身份信息及细节，以及共谋中使用的据称虚假文件的身份信息及细节。”同上，第 572–75 页。\n\n因此，鉴于本案中开示证据材料的压倒性数量以及对我们充分准备辩护能力的潜在不利影响，我们请求您方缩小证据开示的范围。我们寻求一场公正且高效的审判；向我们提供所要求的具体罪状说明并对海量证据进行具体化，将使我们能够确定有效代表我们当事人所必需的相关证据。\n\n关于：罪名项一（合谋进行电信欺诈、证券欺诈、银行欺诈及洗钱）\n\nA. 关于王女士据称的虚假、误导性和/或欺诈性借口、陈述、承诺和/或重大遗漏的具体说明\n\n1. 关于第 1-32 段：\na. 请指明王女士所采用的每一个虚假或欺诈性借口。\ni. 针对每一个此类借口，解释该借口的性质以及为何具有欺骗性，并指明其何处构成虚假或欺诈。\nb. 请指明他人所采用但归咎于王女士的每一个虚假或欺诈性借口。\ni. 针对每一个此类借口，指明采用该借口的一人或多人，并解释为何将其归咎于王女士。\nii. 针对每一个此类借口，解释该借口的性质以及为何具有欺骗性，并指明其何处构成虚假或欺诈。\n\nc. 请指明王女士所作出的或归咎于她的每一项声明、陈述、承诺和/或重大遗漏（统称“声明”）。\ni. 针对由王女士作出或归咎于她、且政府主张构成虚假、误导性和/或欺诈性陈述或承诺，和/或包含重大遗漏的每一项声明，请指明政府指控该声明属于“虚假”、“误导性”、“欺诈性”、“陈述”、“承诺”和/或包含“重大遗漏”。\nii. 针对归咎于王女士的每一项此类声明，指明作出相关声明的一人或多人，并解释为何任何此类声明归咎于王女士。\niii. 针对上文第 A.1.c.i 段回复中所指明的每一项声明，请指明其何处构成虚假。\niv. 针对上文第 A.1.c.i 段回复中所指明的包含重大遗漏的每一项声明，请指明该声明，并解释结合相关情况被遗漏了何种内容从而导致该声明构成虚假或误导。\n\nB. 关于王女士招揽投资的具体说明\n\n1. 关于第 2 段：\na. 关于政府指控王女士利用 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵）先生的高频网络影响力及其数十万网络追随者，通过承诺高额财务回报和其他利益来招揽对各类实体和项目的投资：\ni. 请通过提供每个实体或项目的名称，指明王女士据称参与招揽投资的所有实体和项目。\nii. 针对据称王女士为其招揽投资的每个实体或项目，请指明她就投资者利益（包括预期的财务回报或其他利益）向潜在投资者所作出的（或归咎于她的）具体声明。\n\niii. 针对上文第 B.1.a.ii 段回复中所指明的归咎于王女士的每项具体声明，请指明作出相关声明的一人或多人，并解释为何任何此类声明归咎于王女士。\niv. 关于上文第 B.1.a.ii 段回复中所指明的具体声明，请具体说明每项声明何处构成虚假、欺诈或误导。\n2. 关于第 13 段：\n\na. 关于政府指控王女士与其他被告一道，通过与 GTV 私募相关的非法私募股票发售，欺诈性地获取了超过 4 亿美元的受害者资金，请具体说明：\ni. 据称王女士在 GTV 私募中所扮演的具体角色。\nii. 王女士就 GTV 私募直接或间接作出的（或归咎于她的）具体声明。\niii. 针对上文第 B.2.a.ii 段回复中所指明的归咎于王女士的每项声明，请指明作出相关声明的一人或多人，并解释为何任何此类声明归咎于王女士。\niv. 关于上文第 B.2.a.ii 段回复中的具体声明，请具体说明每项声明何处构成虚假、欺诈或误导。\nv. 请描述王女士为推进 GTV 私募直接或间接采取的具体行动。\n\nC. 关于王女士挪用投资款项的具体说明\n\n1. 关于第 13(h) 段：\na. 关于政府指控王女士及其共谋者挪用了在 GTV 私募中从投资者处筹集的约 1 亿美元，并将这些资金指示\n\n存入一家高风险对冲基金，以使 Saraca Media Group, Inc.（“Saraca”）及其最终受益所有人获益：\n\ni. 请提供关于王女士为促成据称的挪用行为所采取的具体行动的细节。\n2. 关于第 32(b) 段：\n\na. 关于政府指控王女士于 2020 年 6 月 5 日或前后身处纽约南区期间，批准了从 Saraca 向 Fund-1 电汇 1 亿美元：\ni. 请指明 Fund-1 为何者。\nii. 请阐明王女士在批准从 Saraca 向 Fund-1 电汇款项中所扮演的具体角色。\niii. 请具体说明王女士就该电汇款项所提供的任何通信、指示或指令。\n\nD. 关于欺诈金融机构的具体说明\n\n1. 关于第 29 段：\na. 关于政府指控王女士与其他人一道，明知故犯地通过虚假和欺诈性借口、陈述和承诺，实施并企图实施欺诈金融机构的计划：\ni. 请通过提供机构名称，指明据称欺诈计划中所涉及的金融机构。\nii. 针对上文第 D.1.a.i 段回复中所指明的每家金融机构，请提供关于欺诈该金融机构的计划和手段的具体细节，包括王女士所作出的虚假借口、陈述和承诺的性质。\niii. 针对上文第 D.1.a.i 段回复中所指明的每家金融机构，请提供关于据称通过该计划所获取的金钱、资金、信贷、资产、证券或其他财产数额的细节。\n\niv. 针对上文第 D.1.a.i 段回复中所指明的每家金融机构，请具体说明王女士为误导金融机构所作出的（或归咎于她的）虚假和欺诈性借口及声明。\nv. 针对上文第 D.1.a.iv 段回复中所指明的归咎于王女士的每项具体虚假和欺诈性借口及声明，请指明作出相关虚假和欺诈性借口及声明的一人或多人，并解释为何任何此类借口或声明归咎于王女士。\nvi. 关于上文第 D.1.a.iv 段回复中所指明的具体虚假和欺诈性借口及声明，请具体说明每项声明何处构成虚假、欺诈或误导。\n\n关于：罪名项二（电信欺诈——GTV 私募）\n\n- 1. 关于第 34 段：\n\t- a. 针对政府指控 Ms. Wang（王女士）通过虚假陈述与不实说明、电子通信以及资金转账参与涉及 GTV Private Placement（GTV 私募）的欺诈计划：\n\t\t- i. 请提供关于该欺诈计划及手段的具体细节，包括据称由王女士作出的虚假借口、陈述和承诺的性质。\n\t\t- ii. 请明确据称由王女士为在 GTV 私募计划中欺骗并诈骗受害者所采用的策略、战术或方法。\n\t\t- iii. 请明确据称由王女士向潜在受害者作出（或可归咎于王女士）的、作为 GTV 私募一部分以欺诈手段获取资金的虚假陈述。\n\t\t- iv. 针对上述对第 1.a.i. 项回复中指明的、可归咎于王女士的每一项具体虚假陈述，请指明作出相关陈述的一人或多人，并说明为何任何此类陈述应归咎于王女士。\n\n- v. 针对在对第 A.1.c. 段回复中指明的每一项具体虚假陈述，请明确各项陈述中存在何种虚假、欺诈或误导性之处。\n- b. 请提供关于作为该计划一部分的、进出 Southern District of New York（纽约南区）及其他地方的涉案资金转账的细节，包括所涉当事方、每笔转账的起止地点（以及转账可能经过的任何中间实体）、转账金额以及这些转账的目的。\n\n关于：第三项罪名（证券欺诈——GTV 私募）\n\n- 1. 关于第 36 段：\n\t- a. 针对政府指控王女士与他人一起，在证券买卖中故意且明知地采用了操纵性和欺骗性手段，以及王女士与他人进行了 GTV 私募以出售 GTV 股票并通过虚假陈述与不实说明从受害者处获取资金，且该计划通过进出纽约南区及其他地方的电子通信和资金转账得以推进：\n\t\t- i. 请提供关于据称由王女士采用的操纵性和欺骗性装置及计谋的具体细节。\n\t\t- ii. 请指明据称由王女士在 GTV 私募中作出（或可归咎于王女士）的对重要事实的不实陈述。\n\t\t\t- a. 针对上述对第 1.a.ii 项回复中指明的、可归咎于王女士的每一项对重要事实的不实陈述，请指明作出相关虚假陈述的一人或多人，并说明为何任何此类陈述应归咎于王女士。\n\t\t\t- b. 针对上述对第 1.a.ii 项回复中指明的每一项对重要事实的不实陈述，请明确各项陈述中存在何种虚假、欺诈或误导性之处。\n\n- c. 请指明各项相关证券交易发生在哪个国家、城市和州，并请明确各项此类交易与纽约南区的关联。\n- b. 请提供关于作为该计划一部分的、进出纽约南区及其他地方的涉案资金转账的细节，包括所涉当事方、每笔转账的起止地点（以及转账可能经过的任何中间实体）、转账金额以及这些转账的目的。\n\n关于：第十一项罪名（非法货币交易）\n\n- 1. 关于第 52 段：\n\t- a. 针对政府指控王女士与他人一起，明知地使用源自犯罪的财产从事并企图从事货币交易：\n\t\t- i. 请提供关于该货币交易的具体细节，包括交易的日期、方式和地点、所涉当事方、转账金额以及该交易的目的或预期结果。\n\t\t- ii. 请指明交易中所涉财产所源自的具体非法活动，并请提供关于该财产是如何被获取或产生的细节。\n\n请提供这些详细情况，以使辩方能够充分理解并回应政府的指控。\n\n感谢您对这些请求的关注。\n\n此致，\n\nPriya Chaudhry\n\n抄送：Alex Lipman 律师（通过电子邮件）","key_entities":["GTV","Saraca","Fergenson","Murray","Finkel","Yanping Wang","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok"],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":2396,"status":"published","published_at":"2023-12-15 00:00:00","created_at":"2023-12-15","updated_at":"2026-08-23 07:30:21"}