{"id":"court_sdny_404_27","court":"SDNY","case_no":"","doc_number":404,"sub_number":null,"doc_type":"DOC","filed_date":null,"title":"SDNY ECF 404","summary_zh":"诉讼债权摘要声明 —— Ho Wan Kwok 破产案，康州破产法院 22-50073 ECF #404（2022 年 5 月 20 日提交）。Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. 提交 FRE 1006 诉讼债权摘要表，列出 Ho Wan Kwok Schedule F 中涉及的诉讼案件及其当前状态。","summary_en":"Litigation claims summary declaration — Ho Wan Kwok bankruptcy case, District of Connecticut Bankruptcy Court No. 22-50073, ECF #404 (filed May 20, 2022). Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. submits FRE 1006 Litigation Claims Summary Table, detailing the status of litigation matters referenced in Ho Wan Kwok's Schedule F.","body_en":"## **EXHIBIT PAX 27**\n\nRule 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims\n\n## **UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION**\n\nIn re:\n\nChapter 11 Case No.\n\nHO WAN KWOK[1](#page-1-0)\n\n22-50073 (JAM)\n\nDebtor.\n\nMay 20, 2022\n\n## **DECLARATION OF MAKENZIE RUSSO IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.'S MOTION TO DISMISS CHAPTER 11 CASE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL JOINDER TO UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THE APPOINTMENT OF A CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE**\n\nI, Makenzie Russo, declare:\n\n1. I am an attorney admitted to practice law in the State of New York and am an\n\nassociate at the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers, 7 Times Square, New York, NY 10036,\n\ncounsel for Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P. (\"PAX\"). I respectfully submit this\n\nDeclaration in support of PAX's Motion to Dismiss Chapter 11 Case, or in the Alternative,\n\nPartial Joinder to United States Trustee (\"Motion to Dismiss\") [ECF 183].\n\n2. Attached hereto is a true and correct copy of PAX Exhibit 27, \"Federal Rule of\n\nEvidence 1006 Summary Re: Litigation Claims.\" In connection with the May 25, 2022 Hearing\n\non PAX's Motion to Dismiss, PAX offers PAX Exhibit 27 as a summary of information relevant\n\nto the litigation claims referenced in Debtor's Schedule F.[2](#page-1-1)\n\n3. To compile PAX Exhibit 27, colleagues of mine at O'Melveny & Myers LLP (\"O'Melveny\") searched the public record to identify litigation matters involving the litigants\n\n1 The last four digits of the Debtor's taxpayer identification number are 9595.\n\n2 *See* Debtor's Schedule F, ECF 78.\n\nlisted on the Debtor's Schedule F that held a claim against the Debtor individually. For each of the relevant litigation matters identified, O'Melveny reviewed the court's public dockets, gathered the information reflected in the chart, and then summarized the current status of the litigation in the chart. For example, the chart indicates, among other things, whether a case had been dismissed and whether a trial date had been set, citing the appropriate docket entry number.\n\nDated: May 20, 2022 New York, New York Respectfully submitted,\n\n*/s/ Makenzie Russo* Makenzie Russo mrusso@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 728-5819\n\n*Attorney for Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.*\n\n| Claim According to | Status | Trial Date | | |\n|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|--|\n| Schedule F | | | | |\n| Beijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye Stainless Decoration Center et al. v. Wengui Guo et al., Case No. 653176/2017
(N.Y. Sup. 2017) | | | | |\n| | | Case dismissed | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
\\$12,000,000
Unknown
Unknown
\\$9,809,422.71
Unknown
\\$5,568,522
Unknown | Schedule F: Nonpriority Unsecured Creditors1
On May 12, 2020, Defendants' motion to dismiss was granted
\"to the extent that the complaint is dismissed in its entirety
pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7).\" Order, Dkt. No. 69 at 5. The
court ordered the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the
complaint. Id. | | |\n\n## **Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 Summary of Schedule F Litigation Claims**\n\n1 PAX searched the public record for any litigants listed on the Debtor's Schedule F that held a claim against the Debtor individually. *See* Schedule F: Nonpriority Unsecured Creditors, ECF 78 at 19–21. There were a number of purported litigation claims that PAX could not locate in the public record: Clark Hill, Gao Bingchen, Hero Grant Limited, Hong Zeng, Jumbo Century Limited, Kui Cheng, MacDonald, New Dynamic Development Limited, Sail Victory Limited, Strategic Vision, The Sherry-Netherland, Thomas Ragland, UBS AG, UBS AG (London Branch), Well Origin Limited, Yue Hua Zhu Shi.\n\n\n\n| Beijing Fu Le Hong Ma Jian | Unknown | | |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------|\n| Shu Shuang Shi Gong Cheng, | | | |\n| Ltd. | | | |\n| (\"Fu Le Hong Ma\") | | | |\n| Yua Hua Zhuang Shi | \\$1,571,530.36 | | |\n| He Bei Yue Hua Zhuang Shi | Unknown | | |\n| Gong Cheng Ltd | | | |\n| (\"Yue Hua Zhuang Shi\") | | | |\n| Jian Gong | \\$5,380,262.32 | | |\n| Jiang Su Province Jian Gong | Unknown | | |\n| Group Ltd Beijing Branch | | | |\n| (\"Jian Gong\") | | | |\n| (S.D.N.Y. 2017)2
Tang et al. v. Guo, Case No. 1:17-cv-09031 | | | |\n| Baiqiao Tang | Unknown | On February 1, 2022, the Court ordered that \"all claims and | Case dismissed |\n| Jing Geng | Unknown | causes of action asserted in this action by Plaintiff Tang and | |\n| | | Plaintiff Geng are dismissed with prejudice\" where Plaintiff | |\n| | | Tang \"has failed to prosecute his claims\" and \"Plaintiff Geng | |\n| | | passed away in April 2021, and no motion to substitute a proper | |\n| | | party, or for an extension of time to do so, has been filed.\" | |\n| | | Order, Dkt No. 97. | |\n| | | Watson Meng and Boxun Inc. v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 159636/2017 (N.Y. Sup. Nov. 7, 2017) | |\n| Boxun Inc.3 | Unknown | On October 7, 2021, the court certified the case as ready for | No trial date set |\n| Watson Meng4 | Unknown | trial. Note of Issue, Dkt. No. 57. Kwok moved to vacate the | |\n| Weican Meng/Boxun Inc. | \\$1,000,000 | note of issue and the reply briefing was filed on November 9, | |\n| | | 2021. Reply Aff. in Supp. of Mot. to Vacate Note of Issue, Dkt | |\n| | | No. 120. | |\n| Keyi Zilkie, Huizhen Wang, Chao-Chih Chiu, Yunxia Wu v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo, Index No. 652843/2021 (N.Y. Sup. April 29, 2021) | | | |\n| Chao-Chih Chiu | Unknown | On November 5, 2021, the court entered a stay pursuant to the | N/A |\n| Huizhen Wang | Unknown | parties'
stipulation that a stay of the action was appropriate | |\n| Keyi Ziklie | Unknown | while Plaintiffs seek distributions from the SEC-administered | |\n\n2 These parties filed claims in New York Supreme Court. Compl., *Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al*., Case No. [153969/2019](http) (N.Y. Sup. 2019). Those proceedings have been dormant since September 30, 2019, the date the complaint was filed. *See* Docket, *Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al*., Case No. 153969/2019 (N.Y. Sup. 2019).\n\n3 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F. 4 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n| Yunxia Wu | Unknown | Fair Fund in connection with their claims. Order, Dkt. No. 30 at | |\n|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|\n| | | 2. | |\n| | | Zhengjun Dong, Wen Lin, Kaixin Hong, Chenglong Wang v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo, Index No.
652190/2021 | (N.Y. Sup. 2021) |\n| Chenglong Wang | Unknown | Plaintiffs
requested severance of claims against Kwok
in light of | N/A |\n| Kaixin Hong | Unknown | his bankruptcy
in order
to proceed against other defendants. | |\n| Wen Lin | Unknown | Order
to Show Cause, Dkt. No. 106. | |\n| Zhengjun Dong | Unknown | | |\n| Rong Zhang, Xiaodan Wang, Chong Shen Raphanella | | v. Voice of Guo, GTV, Saraca, ROL Miles Guo, Case No. 2:21-cv-01079 | (D. Ariz. 2021) |\n| Chong Shen Raphanella | Unknown | Partial Motion to Dismiss fully briefed as of February 2, 2022 | N/A |\n| Rong Zhang | Unknown | and not yet decided. Mot.
to Dismiss Reply, Dkt. No. 43. | |\n| Xiaodan Wang | Unknown | | |\n| | | Haihong C. Wang v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 3:21-cv-00359
(D. Conn. 2021) | |\n| Haihong Wang | Unknown | Kwok filed an answer to the complaint on October 22, 2021. | N/A |\n| | | Dkt No. 42. There was no other docket activity until the Notice | |\n| | | of Bankruptcy was filed on February 18, 2022. See Docket. | |\n| Weiguo Sun, Linda He Cheing, Jia Li Wang, Jiamei
Lu, Jun Liu, Mao-Fu Weng, Ruqin Wang, Teli Chen, Weixiang Ge, Shuang Wang, Xingyu | | | |\n| | | Yan, Yan Gao, Yi LI and Ying Liu v. GTV, Saraca, Voice of Guo, Wengui Guo,
Case No.
1:21-cv-04529 | (S.D.N.Y. 2021) |\n| Jia Li Wang | \\$430,000 | As of October 14, 2021, discovery in this action was stayed | N/A |\n| Jiamei Lu | Unknown | while plaintiffs pursue recovery in connection with the SEC | |\n| Jun Liu | Unknown | administered Fair Fund. Order, Dkt No. 79. | |\n| Linda He Cheung | Unknown | | |\n| Moa-Fu [Weng] | Unknown | | |\n| Ruquin Wang | Unknown | | |\n| Shuang Wang | Unknown | | |\n| Teli Chen | Unknown | | |\n| Weiguo Sun | Unknown | | |\n| Weixiang Ge | Unknown | | |\n| Xingyu Yan | Unknown | | |\n| Yan Gao | Unknown | | |\n| Yi Li | Unknown | | |\n| Ying Liu | Unknown | | |\n| Jianhu Yi and Quiju Jia v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:21-cv-02669
(S.D.N.Y. 2021) | | | |\n| Jian Hu Yi | Unknown | As of September 22, 2021, discovery in this action was stayed | N/A |\n| Quiju Jia | Unknown | while plaintiffs pursue recovery in connection with the SEC | |\n| | | administered Fair Fund. Order, Dkt.
No.
39. According to a | |\n\n\n\n| | | status update, the parties are in continued settlement discussions | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------|\n| | | to recover from the SEC fund. Letter, Dkt. No. 47. | |\n| | June Shi v. GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo, | Case No. 1:21-cv-01408
(N.D. Ill. 2021) | |\n| June Shi | Unknown | Kwok filed an Answer of September 22, 2021. Amended | N/A |\n| | | Answer, Dkt No. 33. The parties stipulated to a settlement of | |\n| | | some claims on January 14, 2022. Stipulation of Dismissal of | |\n| | | Count VII With Prejudice, Dkt No. 38. | |\n| | | Fan Bingbing v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 156619/2017
(N.Y. Sup. July 24, 2017) | |\n| Fan Bingbing | Unknown | There is no docket activity in this case after the amended | N/A |\n| | | complaint was filed on November 27, 2021. See Docket. | |\n| | | Wengui Guo v. Guo Baosheng, Yan Zhao and Ning Ye, Index No. 151251/2019
(N.Y. Sup. May 3, 2019) | |\n| Guo Baosheng | \\$12,000,000 | There was a gap in the litigation between June 18, 2020 and | N/A |\n| Baosheng Guo5 | Unknown | March 23, 2022. See generally, Docket. During this time | |\n| Ning Ye | \\$12,000,000 | frame, there is only one docket entry. See Notice of ADR | |\n| Yan Zhao | \\$3,000,000 | Options, Dkt
No. 65. On March 21, 2022, the Defendants filed a | |\n| | | Notice of Motion for Leave of the Court to File Supplemental | |\n| | | Motion to Dismiss. Notice, Dkt. No. 66. A Notice of | |\n| | | Bankruptcy was filed shortly thereafter. Notice of Bankruptcy, | |\n| | | Dkt No. 72. | |\n| | | Jiansheng Xie and Jiefu Zheng v. Wengui Guo, Case No. 155995/2017
(N.Y. Supp. 2017) | |\n| Jianshengxie and Jiefu Zheng | Unknown | There is no docket activity in this case after the amended | N/A |\n| | | complaint was filed on June 30, 2017. See
generally,
Docket. | |\n| | | Jonathan Young v. Guo Wengui, Saraca, Golden Spring, Rule of Law Foundation, Case No. 154683/2020 | (N.Y. Sup. 2020) |\n| Jonathan Young | Unknown | Defendants moved to dismiss the case, and those pleadings were | N/A |\n| | | fully briefed as of May 18, 2021. See Docket. There was no | |\n| | | docket activity in the action between May 18, 2021 and | |\n| | | February 16, 2022, when the notice of bankruptcy was filed. Id. | |\n| Wengui
Guo v. Jun Chen (a/k/a Jonathan Ho), Case No. 18-cv-03800, (D.N.J. 2019) | | | |\n| Jun Chen (aka Jonathan Ho) | \\$1,000,000 | On February 22, 2022, the Court ordered the parties to submit | Case dismissed |\n| | | confidential settlement memos on or before March 3, 2022. | pending court |\n| | | Text Order, Dkt No. 52. A settlement mediation was scheduled | approval |\n| | | for March 10, 2022. Scheduling Order, Dkt No. 50. On March | |\n| | | 18, 2022 the
parties \"agreed to a mutual dismissal of their | |\n| | | claims\" and the
court entered an order \"administratively | |\n\n5 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n\n\n| | | terminating the action on his records pending approval of the | | |\n|------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--|\n| | | dismissal by the Bankruptcy Court, at which time it will be | | |\n| | | dismissed with prejudice.\" Order, Dkt No. 55. | | |\n| | | Liehong Zhuang and Xiao Yan Zhu v. Wengui Guo and Saraca Media Group, Index No. 654999/2020 | (N.Y. Sup Oct. 5, 2020) | |\n| Liehong Zhuang | Unknown | On September 23, 2021, the Court granted Kwok's motion to | N/A | |\n| Liehong Zhuang/Xiao Yan | \\$1,005,000 | dismiss in part. Order, Dkt
No. 77. On February 9, 2022, | | |\n| Zhu6 | | Kwok requested that a discovery conference be adjourned in | | |\n| Xiao Yan Zhu | Unknown | light of his not having yet filed an Answer. Letter, Dkt No. 82. | | |\n| | | A notice of bankruptcy was filed shortly thereafter. Notice of | | |\n| | | Bankruptcy, Dkt
No.
85. | | |\n| | | Logan Cheng aka Shuiyan Cheng v. Wengui Guo, Case No. 1:20-cv-05678
(S.D.N.Y. 2020) | | |\n| Logan Cheng (aka Shiuyan | Unknown | Logan Cheng obtained a judgment for \\$196,940.39 on account | N/A | |\n| Cheng) | | of a counterclaim filed in the District of Nevada. Compl., Ex. 5, | | |\n| | | Dkt No. 1-5.
Cheng brought an enforcement proceeding in the | | |\n| | | Southern District of New York. Compl., Dkt No. 1. Both | | |\n| | | parties moved for partial summary judgment, which was fully | | |\n| | | briefed as of February 15, 2022. See generally, Docket. | | |\n| | | Rui Ma v. Guo Wengui and Golden Spring NY, Index No. 158140/2017
(N.Y. Sup. Sept. 11, 2017 | | |\n| Rui Ma | \\$20,000,000 | The case was certified as ready for trial on January 29, 2022. | No trial date set. | |\n| | | Note of Issue, Dkt No. 27. Kwok requested oral argument to | | |\n| | | vacate the Note of Issue on February 15, 2022. Letter, Dkt No. | | |\n| | | 97. | | |\n| | | Ruizheng An v. GTV, Saraca, Guo Wengui, Case No. 1:20-cv-06555 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) | | |\n| Ruizheng An | Unknown | On February 1, 2021, the court ordered an extension of time to | N/A | |\n| | | finalize a settlement. Order, Dkt No. 41. There has been no | | |\n| | | docket activity since. See generally, Docket. | | |\n| | Samuel Dan Nunberg v. Guo Wengui, Index No. 150141/2020
(N.Y. Sup. Feb. 19, 2020) | | | |\n| Samuel Dan Nunberg | Unknown | Nunberg filed an amended complaint on January 21, 2022. | N/A | |\n| Samuel Nunberg7 | \\$1,000,000 | Amended Compl., Dkt No. 96. Kwok moved to strike the | | |\n| | | complaint on February 10, 2022. Mem. of Law in Supp.
of Mot. | | |\n| | | to Strike, Dkt No. 101. | | |\n| Wengui Guo v. Yeliang Xia, No. 18-cv-174
(E.D.Va. 2018) | | | | |\n\n6 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, these names appear as litigation claim holders twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n7 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, this name appears as a litigation claim holder more than once on the Debtor's Schedule F.\n\n\n\n| Yang Yeliang Xia Lan | Unknown | A jury awarded Kwok \\$100,000 judgment plus interest for | N/A | |\n|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|--|\n| | | defamation. Order, Dkt No. 140. The jury awarded the Xia | | |\n| | | \\$10,000 for defamation. Id. | | |\n| | | | | |\n| | | Xia filed a notice of appeal on September 27, 2017. Notice of | | |\n| | | Appeal, Dkt
No. 141. Xia requested oral argument on the | | |\n| | | appeal in December 2021. Wengui Guo v. Yeliang Xia, Case | | |\n| | | No. 19-2062 (4th Cir. 2021), Dkt No. 62. The Court of Appeals | | |\n| | | subsequently entered an order deferring consideration of the | | |\n| | | motion for oral argument pending assignment of the case to a | | |\n| | | panel. Order, Dkt No. 63. | | |\n| | | WA&HF LLC and Ruizheng An v. Saraca, Wengui Guo, Case No. 2:21-cv-00490
(W.D. Wa. 2020) | | |\n| WA&HF LLC | \\$319,130 | The parties entered into a stipulation of dismissal on April 1, | Case dismissed | |\n| | | 2022, upon being able to \"fully compromise[] and settle[] the | | |\n| | | claims.\" Stipulation and Order of Dismissal, Dkt No. 21. | | |\n| | | Xiqui (\"Bob\") Fu v. Guo Wengui, Case No. 20-cv-00257
(W.D.Tx. 2020) | | |\n| Xiqui (\"Bob\") Fu | Unknown | Kwok's Motion to Dismiss was denied on January 15, 2022. | N/A | |\n| | | Order, Dkt No. 97. The case is administratively closed pending | | |\n| | | the outcome of Kwok's bankruptcy. | | |\n| Yan Huang v. Wengui Guo, Index No. 156552/2017
(N.Y. Sup. 2017) | | | | |\n| Yan Huang | Unknown | A stipulation of settlement was entered on April 6, 2021. | Case settled | |\n| | | Stipulation of Settlement, Dkt No. 68. | | |\n| | | Zheng Wu and Yang Lan v. Guo Wengui, Index No. 152123/2018
(N.Y. Sup 2018) | | |\n| Yang Lan | Unknown | Kwok filed an Answer on April 25, 2019. Answer, Dkt No. 36. | N/A | |\n| Yang Lan and Qu Zheng8 | \\$10,000,000 | On March 2, 2020, the Court ordered the parties to participate in | | |\n| Zhang Qu (aka Bruno Wu) | Unknown | a settlement mediation conference. Order, Dkt No. 46. Notices | | |\n| | | of appearance and the notice of bankruptcy
are the only
docket | | |\n| | | activity since that date. See generally, Docket. | | |\n| Wengui Guo v. Danyu Lin, Case No. 2018CP3203623
(S.C., Lexington Cty. 2018) | | | | |\n| Danyu Lin | Unknown | The South Carolina court system lists the status as \"dismissed.\" | Case dismissed | |\n| | | See generally, Docket. | | |\n\n8 For reasons that are unknown to PAX, these names appear as a litigation claim holder twice on the Debtor's Schedule F.","body_zh":"证物 PAX 27\n\n关于诉讼债权的《联邦证据规则》第 1006 条汇总\n美国康涅狄格区破产法院布里奇波特分院（UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION）\n\n关于：\n\n第 11 章破产案号\n\nHO WAN KWOK（郭文贵）[1]\n\n22-50073 (JAM)\n\n债务人。\n\n2022年5月20日\n麦肯齐·鲁索（MAKENZIE RUSSO）进一步支持太盟亚洲机会基金有限公司（PACIFIC ALLIANCE ASIA OPPORTUNITY FUND L.P.）关于驳回第 11 章破产案件动议，或在备选方案下，部分附议美国受托人（UNITED STATES TRUSTEE）关于指令指定第 11 章受托人动议的声明书\n\n我，麦肯齐·鲁索（Makenzie Russo），声明如下：\n\n1. 我是获准在纽约州执业的律师，是奥美尔维尼与迈尔斯律师事务所（O'Melveny & Myers，地址：7 Times Square, New York, NY 10036）的高级律师，该律所为太盟亚洲机会基金有限公司（Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.，以下简称“PAX”）的法律顾问。我谨提交本声明书，以支持 PAX 驳回第 11 章破产案件的动议，或在备选方案下，对美国受托人的部分附议（“驳回动议”）[ECF 183]。\n\n2. 本声明随附 PAX 证物 27 的真实与正确副本，即“关于诉讼债权的《联邦证据规则》第 1006 条汇总”。针对 2022年5月25日 关于 PAX 驳回动议的听证会，PAX 提交 PAX 证物 27，以汇总与债务人附表 F 中提及的诉讼债权相关的信息。[2]\n\n3. 为编制 PAX 证物 27，我本人在奥美尔维尼与迈尔斯律师事务所（O'Melveny & Myers LLP，以下简称“O'Melveny”）的同事检索了公开记录，以查明涉及债务人附表 F 中所列且对债务人个人持有债权的诉讼当事人的诉讼事项。针对所查明的每一项相关诉讼事项，O'Melveny 查阅了法院的公开卷宗，收集了图表中所反映的信息，然后在图表中汇总了该诉讼的当前状态。例如，图表在引用相应卷宗条目编号的同时，指明了案件是否已被驳回以及是否已设定审理日期等内容。\n\n日期：2022年5月20日 纽约州纽约市 谨此提交，\n\n/s/ 麦肯齐·鲁索（Makenzie Russo） 麦肯齐·鲁索（Makenzie Russo） mrusso@omm.com 奥美尔维尼与迈尔斯律师事务所（O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP） 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 电话：(212) 728-5819\n\n太盟亚洲机会基金有限公司（Pacific Alliance Asia Opportunity Fund L.P.）的代理律师\n\n1 债务人纳税人识别号的后四位为 9595。\n\n2 参见债务人附表 F，ECF 78。\n\n附表 F 所列债权　状态　审理日期\n附表 F\n北京中贤伟业不锈钢装饰中心等 诉 郭文贵等（Beijing Zhong Xian Wei Ye Stainless Decoration Center et al. v. Wengui Guo et al.），案号 653176/2017\n（纽约州最高法院 2017 年，N.Y. Sup. 2017）\n案件已驳回\n未知\n未知\n未知\n$12,000,000\n未知\n未知\n$9,809,422.71\n未知\n$5,568,522\n未知\n附表 F：无优先权无担保债权人1\n2020年5月12日，被告的驳回起诉动议获准，“准许范围为依据 CPLR 3211(a)(7) 全部驳回起诉书”。裁定，卷宗号 69 第 5 页。法院指令书记官书记记录驳回起诉书的判决。同上。\n\n关于附表 F 诉讼债权的《联邦证据规则》第 1006 条汇总\n\n1 PAX 检索了公开记录，以查找债务人附表 F 中所列且对债务人个人持有债权的任何诉讼当事人。参见附表 F：无优先权无担保债权人，ECF 78 第 19–21 页。有若干声称的诉讼债权，PAX 未能在公开记录中定位到：克拉克·希尔（Clark Hill）、高冰尘（Gao Bingchen）、Hero Grant Limited、曾宏（Hong Zeng）、Jumbo Century Limited、程奎（Kui Cheng）、麦克唐纳（MacDonald）、New Dynamic Development Limited、Sail Victory Limited、战略愿景（Strategic Vision）、雪莉-尼德兰酒店（The Sherry-Netherland）、托马斯·拉格兰（Thomas Ragland）、瑞士联合银行（UBS AG）、瑞士联合银行（伦敦分行）（UBS AG (London Branch)）、Well Origin Limited、粤华装饰（Yue Hua Zhu Shi）。\n\n北京富乐鸿马建筑双实工程有限公司（Beijing Fu Le Hong Ma Jian Shu Shuang Shi Gong Cheng, Ltd.）（“富乐鸿马”）　未知\n粤华装饰（Yua Hua Zhuang Shi）　$1,571,530.36\n河北粤华装饰工程有限公司（He Bei Yue Hua Zhuang Shi Gong Cheng Ltd）（“粤华装饰”）　未知\n建工（Jian Gong）　$5,380,262.32\n江苏省建工集团有限公司北京分公司（Jiang Su Province Jian Gong Group Ltd Beijing Branch）（“建工”）　未知\n（纽约南区 2017 年，S.D.N.Y. 2017）2\n唐等 诉 郭（Tang et al. v. Guo），案号 1:17-cv-09031\n唐柏桥（Baiqiao Tang）　未知　2022年2月1日，法院裁定“原告唐和原告耿在本诉讼中主张的所有权利请求和诉由均被有偏见驳回”，鉴于原告唐“未能积极推进其权利主张”，且“原告耿于 2021年4月 去世，未曾提交更换合格当事人的动议或延长申请时效的动议”。裁定，卷宗号 97。　案件已驳回\n耿静（Jing Geng）　未知\n\n孟维参及博讯公司 诉 郭文贵（Watson Meng and Boxun Inc. v. Guo Wengui），案号 159636/2017（纽约州最高法院 2017年11月7日，N.Y. Sup. Nov. 7, 2017）\n博讯公司（Boxun Inc.）3　未知　2021年10月7日，法院出具审理就绪证明。争点备忘录，卷宗号 57。郭申请撤销争点备忘录，答辩简报于 2021年11月9日 提交。支持撤销争点备忘录动议的答辩宣誓书，卷宗号 120。　未设定审理日期\n孟维参（Watson Meng）4　未知\n孟维参/博讯公司（Weican Meng/Boxun Inc.）　$1,000,000\n\n柯依·齐尔基、王惠珍、邱昭稚、吴云霞 诉 GTV、Saraca 及 郭文贵（Keyi Zilkie, Huizhen Wang, Chao-Chih Chiu, Yunxia Wu v. GTV, Saraca and Wengui Guo），索引号 652843/2021（纽约州最高法院 2021年4月29日，N.Y. Sup. April 29, 2021）\n邱昭稚（Chao-Chih Chiu）　未知　2021年11月5日，依据当事方关于在原告向美国证券交易委员会（SEC）管理的资金寻求分配期间中止诉讼属正当之约定，法院作出了中止裁定。　不适用\n王惠珍（Huizhen Wang）　未知\n柯依·齐尔基（Keyi Ziklie）　未知\n\n2 这些当事人在纽约州最高法院提起诉求。起诉书，唐柏桥与耿静 诉 郭文贵等（Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al.），案号 153969/2019（纽约州最高法院 2019 年，N.Y. Sup. 2019）。自起诉书提交之日 2019年9月30日 以来，该诉讼程序一直处于停滞状态。参见卷宗，唐柏桥与耿静 诉 郭文贵等（Baiqiao Tang and Jing Geng v. Wengui Guo et al.），案号 153969/2019（纽约州最高法院 2019 年，N.Y. Sup. 2019）。\n\n3 基於 PAX 所不知的原因，該姓名在債務人的 Schedule F（附表 F）中作為訴訟債權人出現了兩次。 4 基於 PAX 所不知的原因，該姓名在債務人的 Schedule F 中作為訴訟債權人出現了兩次。\nYunxia Wu（吳雲霞）　未知　與其索賠相關的公平基金（Fair Fund）。命令，Dkt. No. 30 第 2 頁。\n\nZhengjun Dong, Wen Lin, Kaixin Hong, Chenglong Wang 訴 GTV, Saraca 及 Wengui Guo，Index No. 652190/2021（N.Y. Sup. 2021）\nChenglong Wang（王成龍）　未知　鑒於 Kwok（郭文貴）破產，原告請求將針對他的索賠分離，以便針對其他被告繼續進行訴訟。顯示理由令（Order to Show Cause），Dkt. No. 106。　不適用\nKaixin Hong（洪開心）　未知\nWen Lin（林雯）　未知\nZhengjun Dong（董政君）　未知\n\nRong Zhang, Xiaodan Wang, Chong Shen Raphanella 訴 Voice of Guo, GTV, Saraca, ROL Miles Guo，Case No. 2:21-cv-01079（D. Ariz. 2021）\nChong Shen Raphanella（沈崇）　未知　截至 2022 年 2 月 2 日，部分駁回動議的簡述書狀已全部提交完畢，尚未作出裁定。駁回動議回覆，Dkt. No. 43。　不適用\nRong Zhang（張蓉）　未知\nXiaodan Wang（王曉丹）　未知\n\nHaihong C. Wang 訴 GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo，Case No. 3:21-cv-00359（D. Conn. 2021）\nHaihong Wang（王海紅）　未知　郭文貴於 2021 年 10 月 22 日對訴狀提交了答辯狀。Dkt No. 42。在此之後直至 2022 年 2 月 18 日提交破產通知之前，卷宗中無其他訴訟活動。參見卷宗。　不適用\n\nWeiguo Sun, Linda He Cheing, Jia Li Wang, Jiamei Lu, Jun Liu, Mao-Fu Weng, Ruqin Wang, Teli Chen, Weixiang Ge, Shuang Wang, Xingyu Yan, Yan Gao, Yi LI 及 Ying Liu 訴 GTV, Saraca, Voice of Guo, Wengui Guo，Case No. 1:21-cv-04529（S.D.N.Y. 2021）\nJia Li Wang（王佳麗）　$430,000　截至 2021 年 10 月 14 日，本案的證據開示程序已中止，原告正尋求從 SEC（美國證券交易委員會）管理的公平基金中獲得追償。命令，Dkt No. 79。　不適用\nJiamei Lu（陸家美）　未知\nJun Liu（劉軍）　未知\nLinda He Cheung（何琳達）　未知\nMoa-Fu [Weng]（翁茂富）　未知\nRuquin Wang（王汝琴）　未知\nShuang Wang（王爽）　未知\nTeli Chen（陳特立）　未知\nWeiguo Sun（孫衛國）　未知\nWeixiang Ge（葛衛祥）　未知\nXingyu Yan（嚴星宇）　未知\nYan Gao（高岩）　未知\nYi Li（李毅）　未知\nYing Liu（劉英）　未知\n\nJianhu Yi 及 Quiju Jia 訴 GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo，Case No. 1:21-cv-02669（S.D.N.Y. 2021）\nJian Hu Yi（易建虎）　未知　截至 2021 年 9 月 22 日，本案的證據開示程序已中止，原告正尋求從 SEC 管理的公平基金中獲得追償。命令，Dkt. No. 39。根據一份進展匯報，雙方正就從 SEC 基金中追償事宜進行持續的和解談判。信函，Dkt. No. 47。　不適用\nQuiju Jia（賈貴菊）　未知\n\nJune Shi 訴 GTV, Saraca, Wengui Guo，Case No. 1:21-cv-01408（N.D. Ill. 2021）\nJune Shi（石雋）　未知　郭文貴於 2021 年 9 月 22 日提交了答辯狀。修改後答辯狀，Dkt No. 33。雙方於 2022 年 1 月 14 日就部分索賠達成了和解協議。附帶偏見駁回第七項罪名之約定（Stipulation of Dismissal of Count VII With Prejudice），Dkt No. 38。　不適用\n\nFan Bingbing 訴 Guo Wengui，Case No. 156619/2017（N.Y. Sup. 2017 年 7 月 24 日）\nFan Bingbing（范冰冰）　未知　在 2021 年 11 月 27 日提交修改後訴狀後，本案卷宗中無進一步訴訟活動。參見卷宗。　不適用\n\nWengui Guo 訴 Guo Baosheng, Yan Zhao 及 Ning Ye，Index No. 151251/2019（N.Y. Sup. 2019 年 5 月 3 日）\nGuo Baosheng（郭寶勝）　$12,000,000　在 2020 年 6 月 18 日至 2022 年 3 月 23 日期間，訴訟出現了中斷。總體參見卷宗。在此時間段內，僅有一項卷宗記錄。參見 ADR 選擇通知（Notice of ADR Options），Dkt No. 65。2022 年 3 月 21 日，被告提交了請求法院許可提交補充駁回動議之通知。通知，Dkt. No. 66。此後不久提交了破產通知。破產通知，Dkt No. 72。　不適用\nBaosheng Guo5　未知\nNing Ye（葉寧）　$12,000,000\nYan Zhao（趙岩）　$3,000,000\n\nJiansheng Xie 及 Jiefu Zheng 訴 Wengui Guo，Case No. 155995/2017（N.Y. Supp. 2017）\nJianshengxie and Jiefu Zheng（謝建升與鄭介甫）　未知　在 2017 年 6 月 30 日提交修改後訴狀後，本案卷宗中無進一步訴訟活動。總體參見卷宗。　不適用\n\nJonathan Young 訴 Guo Wengui, Saraca, Golden Spring, Rule of Law Foundation，Case No. 154683/2020（N.Y. Sup. 2020）\nJonathan Young（楊喬納森）　未知　被告提出駁回本案的動議，相關訴答書狀截至 2021 年 5 月 18 日已全部提交完畢。參見卷宗。在 2021 年 5 月 18 日至 2022 年 2 月 16 日提交破產通知期間，該訴訟中無卷宗活動。同上。　不適用\n\nWengui Guo 訴 Jun Chen（又名 Jonathan Ho），Case No. 18-cv-03800,（D.N.J. 2019）\nJun Chen (aka Jonathan Ho)（陳軍，又名 Jonathan Ho）　$1,000,000　2022 年 2 月 22 日，法院命令各方於 2022 年 3 月 3 日或之前提交保密和解備忘錄。文字命令（Text Order），Dkt No. 52。和解調解定於 2022 年 3 月 10 日進行。日程安排令，Dkt No. 50。2022 年 3 月 18 日，雙方「同意相互撤回對彼此的索賠」，且法院作出命令，「在其記錄中對本案進行行政結案，待破產法院批准駁回，屆時本案將被附帶偏見駁回。」命令，Dkt No. 55。　案件已駁回，待法院批准\n\n5 基於 PAX 所不知的原因，該姓名在債務人的 Schedule F 中作為訴訟債權人出現了兩次。\n\nLiehong Zhuang 及 Xiao Yan Zhu 訴 Wengui Guo 及 Saraca Media Group，Index No. 654999/2020（N.Y. Sup 2020 年 10 月 5 日）\nLiehong Zhuang（莊烈宏）　未知　2021 年 9 月 23 日，法院部分支持了郭文貴的駁回動議。命令，Dkt No. 77。2022 年 2 月 9 日，鑒於郭文貴尚未提交答辯狀，其請求推遲證據開示會議。信函，Dkt No. 82。此後不久提交了破產通知。破產通知，Dkt No. 85。　不適用\nLiehong Zhuang/Xiao Yan Zhu6　$1,005,000\nXiao Yan Zhu（朱小燕）　未知\n\nLogan Cheng 又名 Shuiyan Cheng 訴 Wengui Guo，Case No. 1:20-cv-05678（S.D.N.Y. 2020）\nLogan Cheng (aka Shiuyan Cheng)（程水炎，又名 Logan Cheng）　未知　Logan Cheng 憑藉在內華達聯邦地區法院提起的一項反訴獲得了一筆 $196,940.39 的判決。訴狀，附件 5，Dkt No. 1-5。Cheng 在紐約南區聯邦地區法院提起執行程序。訴狀，Dkt No. 1。雙方均提出了部分簡易判決動議，截至 2022 年 2 月 15 日，相關書狀已全部提交完畢。總體參見卷宗。　不適用\n\nRui Ma 訴 Guo Wengui 及 Golden Spring NY，Index No. 158140/2017（N.Y. Sup. 2017 年 9 月 11 日）\nRui Ma（馬蕊）　$20,000,000　本案於 2022 年 1 月 29 日被確認符合審判準備就緒標準。審理備忘錄（Note of Issue），Dkt No. 27。郭文貴於 2022 年 2 月 15 日請求進行口頭辯論以撤銷該審理備忘錄。信函，Dkt No. 97。　尚未確定審判日期。\n\nRuizheng An 訴 GTV, Saraca, Guo Wengui，Case No. 1:20-cv-06555（S.D.N.Y. 2020）\nRuizheng An（安瑞正）　未知　2021 年 2 月 1 日，法院命令延長完成敲定和解的期限。命令，Dkt No. 41。此後再無卷宗活動。總體參見卷宗。　不適用\n\nSamuel Dan Nunberg 訴 Guo Wengui，Index No. 150141/2020（N.Y. Sup. 2020 年 2 月 19 日）\nSamuel Dan Nunberg（薩繆爾·丹·農伯格）　未知　Nunberg 於 2022 年 1 月 21 日提交了修改後訴狀。修改後訴狀，Dkt No. 96。郭文貴於 2022 年 2 月 10 日提出動議請求刪除該訴狀。支持刪除動議之法律備忘錄，Dkt No. 101。　不適用\nSamuel Nunberg7　$1,000,000\n\nWengui Guo 訴 Yeliang Xia，No. 18-cv-174（E.D.Va. 2018）\n\n6 基於 PAX 所不知的原因，這些姓名在債務人的 Schedule F 中作為訴訟債權人出現了兩次。\n\n7 基於 PAX 所不知的原因，該姓名在債務人的 Schedule F 中作為訴訟債權人出現了不止一次。\n\nYang Yeliang Xia Lan（夏業良）　未知　陪審團就誹謗裁定郭文貴獲得 $100,000 的判決金額加計利息。命令，Dkt No. 140。陪審團就誹謗裁定 Xia 獲得 $10,000。同上。Xia 於 2017 年 9 月 27 日提交了上訴通知。上訴通知，Dkt No. 141。Xia 於 2021 年 12 月就該上訴請求進行口頭辯論。Wengui Guo 訴 Yeliang Xia，Case No. 19-2062（4th Cir. 2021），Dkt No. 62。上訴法院隨後作出一項命令，推遲對口頭辯論動議的審議，直至本案分配給合議庭。命令，Dkt No. 63。　不適用\n\nWA&HF LLC 及 Ruizheng An 訴 Saraca, Wengui Guo，Case No. 2:21-cv-00490（W.D. Wa. 2020）\nWA&HF LLC　$319,130　在能夠「完全妥協並解決索賠」後，雙方於 2022 年 4 月 1 日簽署了一份約定駁回書。約定及駁回裁定（Stipulation and Order of Dismissal），Dkt No. 21。　案件已駁回\n\nXiqui (\"Bob\") Fu 訴 Guo Wengui，Case No. 20-cv-00257（W.D.Tx. 2020）\nXiqui (\"Bob\") Fu（傅希秋）　未知　郭文貴的駁回動議於 2022 年 1 月 15 日被駁回。命令，Dkt No. 97。本案已進行行政結案，待郭文貴破產案件的結果而定。　不適用\n\nYan Huang 訴 Wengui Guo，Index No. 156552/2017（N.Y. Sup. 2017）\nYan Huang（黃燕）　未知　雙方於 2021 年 4 月 6 日達成了和解協議。和解協議（Stipulation of Settlement），Dkt No. 68。　案件已和解\n\nZheng Wu 及 Yang Lan 訴 Guo Wengui，Index No. 152123/2018（N.Y. Sup 2018）\nYang Lan（楊瀾）　未知　郭文貴於 2019 年 4 月 25 日提交了答辯狀。答辯狀，Dkt No. 36。2020 年 3 月 2 日，法院命令雙方參加和解調解會議。命令，Dkt No. 46。自該日期起，出庭通知和破產通知是僅有的卷宗活動。總體參見卷宗。　不適用\nYang Lan and Qu Zheng8（楊瀾與吳征）　$10,000,000\nZhang Qu (aka Bruno Wu)（吳征，又名 Bruno Wu）　未知\n\nWengui Guo 訴 Danyu Lin，Case No. 2018CP3203623（S.C., Lexington Cty. 2018）\nDanyu Lin（林丹宇）　未知　南卡羅來納州法院系統將狀態列為「已駁回」。總體參見卷宗。　案件已駁回\n\n8 基於 PAX 所不知的原因，這些姓名在債務人的 Schedule F 中作為訴訟債權人出現了兩次。","key_entities":[],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":3495,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 08:12:09"}