{"id":"court_sdny_425_0","court":"SDNY","case_no":"","doc_number":425,"sub_number":null,"doc_type":"DOC","filed_date":"2024-07-23","title":"SDNY ECF 425","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"O6D1GUO1\n1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n2 ------------------------------x\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n3\nv. 23 Cr. 118 (AT)\n4\nMILES GUO,\n5\nDefendant. Trial\n6 ------------------------------x\nNew York, N.Y.\n7 June 13, 2024\n9:00 a.m.\n8\nBefore:\n9\n10 HON. ANALISA TORRES,\n11 District Judge\n-and a Jury-\n12\nAPPEARANCES\n13\nDAMIAN WILLIAMS\n14 United States Attorney for the\nSouthern District of New York\n15 BY: MICAH F. FERGENSON\nRYAN B. FINKEL\n16 JUSTIN HORTON\nJULIANA N. MURRAY\n17 Assistant United States Attorneys\n18 SABRINA P. SHROFF\nAttorney for Defendant\n19\nPRYOR CASHMAN LLP\n20 Attorneys for Defendant\nBY: SIDHARDHA KAMARAJU\n21 MATTHEW BARKAN\n22 ALSTON & BIRD LLP\nAttorneys for Defendant\n23 BY: E. SCOTT SCHIRICK\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 ALSO PRESENT:\nIsabel Loftus, Paralegal Specialist, USAO\n2 Ruben Montilla, Defense Paralegal\nTuo Huang, Interpreter (Mandarin)\n3 Shi Feng, Interpreter (Mandarin)\nYu Mark Tang, Interpreter (Mandarin)\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 (Trial resumed; jury not present)\n2 THE COURT: Good morning.\n3 MR. FERGENSON: Good morning.\n4 THE COURT: Please make your appearances.\n5 MR. FERGENSON: Good morning, your Honor. Micah\n6 Fergenson, Juliana Murray, Justin Horton for the government;\n7 also joined by our paralegal Isabel Loftus.\n8 MR. SCHIRICK: Good morning, your Honor. Scott\n9 Schirick, Sabrina Shroff, and Matt Barkan on behalf of Mr. Guo,\n10 who also joins us here at counsel's table.\n11 THE COURT: Please be seated.\n12 By letter dated June 12, 2024, the government states\n13 that it will call Samuel Roberts, the head of financial\n14 intelligence at Bitgo, which \"provided certain services to the\n15 Himalaya Exchange.\" The government expects that Mr. Roberts\n16 will testify about \"his participation in Bitgo's reviews of its\n17 business relationship with the Himalaya Exchange.\"\n18 Specifically, Bitgo conducted two reviews—–a preliminary due\n19 diligence inquiry upon beginning its business relationship with\n20 the Exchange in 2021, and another \"more searching\" review after\n21 receiving a subpoena related to the Exchange. As part of this\n22 second review, Mr. Roberts communicated with Exchange\n23 representatives, \"evaluated information provided by the\n24 Himalaya Exchange and from public sources,\" and recommended\n25 that Bitgo terminate the relationship with the Exchange.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 By letter dated June 12, 2024, the defense states that\n2 \"certain of Mr. Roberts's anticipated testimony about factual\n3 information he gathered may be admissible.\" However, the\n4 defense seeks to preclude the government from eliciting\n5 Mr. Roberts's opinions as to whether Himalaya Coin and Himalaya\n6 Dollar are cryptocurrencies, whether the Himalaya Exchange is a\n7 cryptocurrency exchange, and the design/functions of Himalaya\n8 Coin, Himalaya Dollar, and the Himalaya Exchange.\n9 Early this morning, the government filed a response\n10 stating that it does not intend \"to ask Roberts his opinion\n11 whether Himalaya Coin and Himalaya Dollar are cryptocurrencies\n12 or whether the Himalaya Exchange is a cryptocurrency exchange.\"\n13 Rather, the government represents that \"Roberts would be\n14 testifying about what he observed, what he was told by the\n15 Exchange, and how that information impacted the review he\n16 conducted and informed his recommendation that Bitgo terminate\n17 its relationship with the Exchange.\"\n18 To the extent that there is still a dispute between\n19 the parties, the Court agrees with defendant that whether H\n20 Coin and H Dollar are cryptocurrencies and whether the Himalaya\n21 Exchange is a cryptocurrency exchange are questions that\n22 require \"scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge\"\n23 within the meaning of Rule 702. Indeed, both parties have\n24 noticed experts to opine about these two questions.\n25 Mr. Roberts, by contrast, has not been noticed as an expert\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 witness. Accordingly, the government shall not elicit his\n2 opinions as to these two topics.\n3 The Court shall not broadly preclude Mr. Roberts's\n4 testimony about the design and function of Himalaya Coin,\n5 Himalaya Dollar, and the Himalaya Exchange. He may state that\n6 he recommended that Bitgo terminate its relationship based on\n7 his findings, but he may not offer general information about\n8 the characteristics of cryptocurrency, nor may he offer an\n9 opinion as to whether H Coin, H Dollar were cryptocurrencies\n10 and whether the Exchange was a cryptocurrency exchange.\n11 Is there anything further?\n12 MR. FERGENSON: One matter from the government, your\n13 Honor.\n14 We just wanted——we wanted to alert the Court so it's\n15 aware. We're discussing this with the defense actively. But\n16 we wanted to let the Court know——\n17 To back up, for context, the government's——one of the\n18 government's witnesses noticed for this week is Beau Collins.\n19 He was the CEO of Mercantile Bank. And as a refresher for your\n20 Honor, Mercantile Bank was the——I think you could call it the\n21 digital bank. It was a Puerto Rico financial institution that\n22 Hamilton, the William Je entity, was going to acquire. Shortly\n23 before that acquisition, the government executed its seizure\n24 warrants on Hamilton's bank accounts. That was the seizure of\n25 the ultimately around $600 million or so. Mr. Collins was the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 CEO of Mercantile. The government was going to call him to\n2 testify sort of about the Himalaya Exchange was a client of\n3 Mercantile Bank and had bank accounts there. The government's\n4 going to call him to testify about that relationship and the\n5 proposed acquisition and then the ultimate seizure of the\n6 funds, which stopped the acquisition.\n7 After the acquisition, there was an arbitration\n8 between Mercantile and Hamilton, like a private arbitration\n9 based on, to my understanding, like a contract dispute in the\n10 purchase of sale agreement. That was litigated in the\n11 arbitration. I think Mercantile won the arbitration,\n12 ultimately filed for a con——I don't know the correct term——a\n13 confirmation of the arbitration award in the S.D.N.Y. I'm not\n14 sure the status of that case, but the arbitration was done.\n15 We received in mid-April——we requested and then\n16 received in mid-April a production from Mercantile——mid-April\n17 of this year. That was in response to our request for any\n18 testimony that Mr. Collins gave in the arbitration. We\n19 understood he had testified. We received from Mercantile\n20 the——I think you would call it the arbitration file, your\n21 Honor. On quick review, it appears to be the filings by the\n22 parties in the arbitration, perhaps some correspondence or\n23 discovery back and forth between the parties in the\n24 arbitration, the arbitration award, and the hearing transcript\n25 of the arbitration. I think it was a two-day hearing. That\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 production was mistakenly not produced to the defense, the\n2 mid-April of this year production. We learned that last night.\n3 We produced it to the defense immediately. While it was being\n4 uploaded, the government clicked through this production as\n5 fast as we could to get a sense of what is in there. That's,\n6 you know, what my understanding——from that, that's my\n7 understanding what it is. We flagged what we thought was the\n8 most pertinent part of that for Mr. Collins, which is his——I\n9 believe in the arbitration they did direct testimony via\n10 affidavit and then got crossed at the hearing. So we flagged\n11 his affidavit, the other Mercantile employee affidavits we saw,\n12 and we flagged the hearing transcript, like the Bates numbers\n13 for those, your Honor. Unfortunately, it is a large number of\n14 pages. It's around 16,000 pages. My understanding is that is\n15 about 754 documents. I think, from my clicking through very\n16 quickly, my sense is the reason the page numbers is so much\n17 larger than the document count is, your Honor could think of\n18 like a motion for summary judgment where a party is filing a\n19 brief to the arbitrators and attaching as exhibits, you know,\n20 long contracts about the arbitration and due diligence\n21 documents on Mercantile, that sort of thing. But there's very\n22 long exhibits to these filings. That's my sense, on very quick\n23 review of this. We have not determined yet——although we want\n24 to further review this to be further helpful to the defense on\n25 the contents of this production, but we had received from\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 Mercantile prior to this very voluminous production already in\n2 response to a grand jury subpoena that had requested any and\n3 all documents related to Hamilton and specified, including any\n4 proposed merger transaction. That was our grand jury subpoena\n5 request. In response to that, they had given us previously and\n6 we had previously produced around 16,000 documents, which was\n7 around 79,000 pages. Now we have not confirmed that the\n8 exhibits to these arbitration filings are duplicative of the\n9 prior grand jury subpoena productions. Topically, they——they\n10 should be, but that's one thing that we want to look at to see\n11 if we can flag anything for the defense that may be new, or\n12 anything else that, in our judgment, may be particularly\n13 pertinent to Mr. Collins's testimony or that we want to flag\n14 for them so they can take a closer look at that. As I said,\n15 we're also just generally discussing this with the defense.\n16 We're open to moving Mr. Collins's testimony to allow them more\n17 time to review this, and we don't have an agreement as to\n18 what——how to proceed with Mr. Collins. He is not testifying\n19 today no matter what. We're open to ideas on how best to\n20 accommodate it. We want to be efficient with the jury's time\n21 and the Court's time. We're open to any number of options,\n22 including possibly, you know, if the defense were open to this,\n23 maybe Mr. Collins could do his direct on Friday but not get\n24 crossed until Monday, give them additional time to review this\n25 production and his direct testimony transcript, or even if they\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1\n1 want us to just not call him until next week, we're open to\n2 this. We're discussing it. I just wanted to alert the Court\n3 to the issue and, you know, just as an FYI for this issue.\n4 THE COURT: Is there a table of contents for the grand\n5 jury documents and for the arbitration documents?\n6 MR. FERGENSON: There's not a table of contents, I\n7 don't believe so, your Honor.\n8 THE COURT: Does the defense have anything to say?\n9 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, I can only comment to this\n10 briefly. Mr. Kamaraju is actually right now in the process of\n11 trying to assess these materials because as Mr. Fergenson\n12 noted, we just got them late last night. So we're not at this\n13 point able to sort of give a substantive assessment of what we\n14 have. Obviously we need to spend a little bit of time with it\n15 to be able to do that. But I would just note for the Court,\n16 you know, that Mr. Collins was on the government's witness list\n17 that they sent us on Saturday morning, so he was noticed, you\n18 know, over the weekend, and, you know, we're just receiving\n19 this information last evening. And, you know, as I said,\n20 Mr. Kamaraju I think a little bit later today will, after he's\n21 had a chance to look at it, come and address the issue in more\n22 detail.\n23 I would just flag, in addition to the logistical\n24 issues that the government has already raised about\n25 Mr. Collins's testimony, you know, the sort of parallel issue\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 that I think we may find ourselves, depending on how we handle\n2 Mr. Collins's testimony, with additional time at the end of the\n3 day tomorrow. It remains to be seen, obviously. We would all\n4 love if that were the case, if things moved that quickly. But\n5 to the extent that we do, we don't have any notice from the\n6 government as to who else they may call at this point to take\n7 that time. So again, this is happening in realtime. We\n8 haven't had that much of a chance to discuss it with the\n9 government, but I just flag that for the Court.\n10 MR. FERGENSON: And we appreciate that, your Honor,\n11 and that's something else we're happy to discuss with the\n12 defense and do everything we can to try and accommodate them.\n13 You know, we can't promise there won't be mistakes, but if we\n14 learn of them, we'll try and do the right thing when we do, and\n15 that's what we're hoping to do here.\n16 THE COURT: Don't you have a bevy of folks who can be\n17 comparing the two documents while you're on trial?\n18 MR. FERGENSON: I'm not sure we have a bevy, but that\n19 is our plan, your Honor. We're going to try and do that\n20 comparison and flag anything further for the defense.\n21 THE COURT: Is there anything further?\n22 MR. FERGENSON: Not from the government.\n23 MR. SCHIRICK: Not from the defense, your Honor.\n24 THE COURT: All righty. We'll reconvene at 9:30.\n25 Please have the witness on the stand at 9:29.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 MR. FERGENSON: Yes, your Honor.\n2 (Recess)\n3 THE COURT: Please have the jurors brought in.\n4 (Jury present)\n5 THE COURT: Please be seated.\n6 Good morning, jurors.\n7 THE JURORS: Good morning.\n8 THE COURT: We're going to continue with the direct\n9 examination of the witness.\n10 Please remember that you're still under oath.\n11 You may inquire.\n12 MR. FERGENSON: Thank you, your Honor.\n13 MINRAN WU, resumed.\n14 DIRECT EXAMINATION CONTINUED\n15 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n16 Q. Good morning, Ms. Wu.\n17 A. Good morning.\n18 Q. And Ms. Wu, when we broke yesterday, we were discussing the\n19 farm loan program. Do you remember that?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Did you participate in the farm loan program?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And did you send money to your farm?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. How much did you send?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 A. $20,000.\n2 Q. And approximately when did you send the $20,000?\n3 A. August 2020.\n4 Q. And where did you send the 20,000?\n5 A. Mountains of Spice, LLC, something like that.\n6 Q. And what was the name on the account that you used to send\n7 the money to Mountains of Spices?\n8 A. Wonder Invest, LLC.\n9 Q. And in connection with that transfer, did you sign a loan\n10 agreement?\n11 A. Yes, should be.\n12 MR. FERGENSON: Ms. Loftus, could we show the witness\n13 what's marked as Government Exhibit VN39.\n14 Q. Ms. Wu, is this the loan agreement?\n15 A. Yes. Yes.\n16 MR. FERGENSON: The government offers Government\n17 Exhibit VN39.\n18 MR. SCHIRICK: No objection.\n19 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n20 (Government's Exhibit VN39 received in evidence)\n21 MR. FERGENSON: Could we please publish that.\n22 All right. And Ms. Loftus, if we could zoom on the\n23 top half just to make the text larger for everyone. That's\n24 great.\n25 BY MR. FERGENSON:\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 Q. All right. Ms. Wu, do you see at the top here it says Loan\n2 Agreement?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And who is the borrower on this loan agreement?\n5 A. MOS Farm, Mountains of Spice Farm.\n6 Q. And who's the lender?\n7 A. Me.\n8 Q. What's the date for this loan agreement?\n9 A. August 12, 2020.\n10 Q. And under loan amount, do you see it says $20,000?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. So focusing you on the paragraph 1(a) there, Use of\n13 Proceeds, I'll go ahead and read that paragraph.\n14 A. Okay.\n15 Q. So it says, \"Use of Proceeds: The loan proceeds advanced\n16 under this Agreement is for the general working capital\n17 purposes of the Borrower.\" And the Borrower is the farm,\n18 right, Ms. Wu?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Now, Ms. Wu, did you read that before or after you sent the\n21 money?\n22 A. I cannot remember because at that time a lot of things just\n23 pushed together. We were so hurry and hectic because they gave\n24 us 24 hours to 48 hours, anyway, just a very short time to wait\n25 our bank account information, because they use several bank\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 accounts, but they send each person different bank account. I\n2 don't know what they were, just that we needed to wait for our\n3 own bank account. After that, we need to wire the money\n4 immediately, because they said those bank accounts would be\n5 stopped at any time because of the CCP. And then we need to\n6 write an email to the email address they gave us, provided a\n7 lot of stuff they required, and then just after, just to\n8 send——we sent the email to the farm, we need to join a Telegram\n9 group. In that group, we needed to wait the confirmation from\n10 them about our money. So, very busy. May——maybe just a——a\n11 little——a little thing about the contract before sign, before\n12 send the money, but to——I don't think I had a lot of time to\n13 read it little by little, turn by turn.\n14 Q. And Ms. Wu, you explained yesterday that you understood\n15 this loan agreement was to get GTV stock. Do you recall that?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. And the Use of Proceeds does not mention GTV stock, right?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. What, if anything, were you told about why that was?\n20 A. They said they couldn't write clearly about that in this\n21 contract just because of the CCP; because CCP always eyeing\n22 this group, they couldn't do that.\n23 Q. And who told you that?\n24 A. Miles Guo said this. Xia Qidong also said this.\n25 Q. And remind us again what Xia Qidong's other name is.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 A. Changdao or Changdao Weida.\n2 Q. What does that mean again?\n3 A. Changdao means an island, Weida is great brother.\n4 Q. And Ms. Wu, focusing on paragraph (c) of this contract, do\n5 you see the——it says \"interest rate.\" What was the interest\n6 rate?\n7 A. They said we borrowed our money to the farm, right, the\n8 farm should give us this interest, 3 percent each year.\n9 MR. FERGENSON: And Ms. Loftus, if we could now scroll\n10 down to page 7.\n11 Q. And Ms. Wu, did you sign this contract?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. And who else signed it?\n14 A. Xia Qidong.\n15 Q. And now what was the date you signed the contract, Ms. Wu?\n16 A. August the 12th, 2020.\n17 Q. And what was the date that Xia Qidong signed the contract?\n18 A. November 2, 2021.\n19 Q. Over a year later?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 MR. FERGENSON: Now, Ms. Loftus, if we could scroll\n22 down to page 9.\n23 Q. Ms. Wu, do you see it says Name of Entity and it says\n24 Wonder Invest, LLC?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 Q. Can you remind us, what is Wonder Invest, LLC?\n2 A. It's my own company.\n3 MR. FERGENSON: And if we could go to the next page,\n4 Ms. Loftus, please.\n5 Q. All right. Now, Ms. Wu, do you see this says Addendum at\n6 the top?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 MR. FERGENSON: And Ms. Loftus, maybe just to make it\n9 easier to read, could we blow up the top half.\n10 Q. Okay. I'll just go ahead and read paragraph 1.\n11 So paragraph 1 says, \"Provision 1(a) of loan agreement\n12 shall be modified as to follows. The loan proceeds advanced\n13 under this agreement may be used by the borrower at its\n14 discretion without limitation, including but not limited for\n15 working capital, political activities, loaning out to other\n16 parties, and/or investment purposes.\"\n17 Ms. Wu, what, if anything, did Changdao say about this\n18 addendum?\n19 A. I don't remember.\n20 MR. FERGENSON: And if we could zoom out, please,\n21 Ms. Loftus, and go to page 12, just another couple pages down.\n22 Keep going, please.\n23 Q. Okay. Just to focus on when the addendum was signed,\n24 Ms. Wu?\n25 A. November 5, 2021.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 Q. And that's when you signed it, correct?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. And what was the date that Xia Qidong signed this?\n4 A. November 2, 2021.\n5 Q. And is that the same date that Xia Qidong signed the——or\n6 Changdao signed the original loan agreement?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 MR. FERGENSON: Okay. Now let's go back up,\n9 Ms. Loftus. Let's go back to page 12 of the document. And\n10 I'll ask you to please zoom, if you would, on paragraph 6,\n11 please.\n12 Q. Okay. So I'll go ahead and read paragraph 6, Ms. Wu.\n13 A. Okay.\n14 Q. It says, \"The borrower shall have the right to unilaterally\n15 terminate the loan agreement if the lender has committed or\n16 commits the following:\n17 \"(a) lender defames, libels, insults, humiliates,\n18 abuses, curses verbally or in writing, in public or secrecy,\n19 Mr. Wengui Guo aka Miles Guo;\n20 \"(b) lender makes any statements or engages any\n21 conducts that are against the missions of the Whistleblower\n22 Movement (WM). For the purpose of this loan agreement, WM is\n23 defined as a combination of campaigns, actions and platforms\n24 (including GTV) designated to disclose the criminal activities\n25 of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and spread the truth about\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 CCP's atrocity for the purpose of achieving the total and\n2 complete destruction of the CCP; or\n3 \"(c) lender makes any statements or engages any\n4 activities that are against the missions of the New Federal\n5 State of China (NFSC). For the purpose of this note, NFSC is a\n6 semi state sovereignty created and initiated by Mr. Miles Guo\n7 and supported by anti-CCP communities on June 4th 2020 at New\n8 York with the mission of establishing a new China without CCP\n9 to promote the universal ideas of rule of law, freedom, and\n10 democracy to Chinese people.\"\n11 Ms. Wu, we discussed the original loan agreement. At\n12 the time you received the loan addendum in November 2021, did\n13 you read the addendum before signing it?\n14 A. No.\n15 Q. Why didn't you read the addendum before you signed it?\n16 A. At that time actually, I already thought about ask to\n17 refund.\n18 Q. And why did considering asking for a refund, why did that\n19 affect whether you read the contract? Or the addendum. Excuse\n20 me.\n21 A. This was in November, right? Actually, I began to doubt\n22 this organization from April or May 2021st, because at that\n23 time SEC published the settlement, the settlement with the GTV,\n24 so I went to the website, read that documentation, then I felt\n25 something not right; also some other things together.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 Q. And we'll talk about those things in a few minutes, Ms. Wu.\n2 A. Okay.\n3 MR. FERGENSON: Ms. Loftus, if we could just zoom out\n4 and go back to page 12, just——oh, I'm sorry. Page 14. Excuse\n5 me.\n6 Q. So Ms. Wu, just, could you explain why, if at the time you\n7 were considering asking for a refund, why you still signed this\n8 addendum.\n9 A. If I didn't do this, I definitely would no chance to ask a\n10 refund.\n11 Q. And why do you say that?\n12 A. First, I heard a lot of people said if they asked a refund,\n13 then they maybe——just maybe I——I cannot guarantee, because I\n14 heard people said a lot of people already was expelled from\n15 their farms because of their——refund request. Then——\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, objection to the hearsay.\n17 THE COURT: Sustained.\n18 MR. FERGENSON: It's being offered for the effect of\n19 why she signed the addendum, your Honor, not for the truth of\n20 the out-of-court statement.\n21 THE COURT: In that case then, the answer stands.\n22 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n23 Q. I'm sorry, Ms. Wu. You were explaining why you signed the\n24 addendum even though you were thinking about asking for a\n25 refund.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 A. And then I——I just thought I needed a safe way to do this.\n2 I hadn't defined a way at that time. Then I had to sign this\n3 first, and later, I think I will——I will do something.\n4 Q. When you say \"do something,\" what do you mean?\n5 A. Find a perfect opportunity to do this.\n6 Q. And when you say \"do this,\" what are you referring to,\n7 Ms. Wu?\n8 A. Ask for a refund.\n9 Q. And did you——we'll talk about it later, but did you\n10 ultimately ask for a refund from the farm loan?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Okay. We'll turn to that in a moment.\n13 Ms. Wu, what, if any, volunteer work did you do\n14 related to farm loan transfers?\n15 A. In the group, just the farm——the MOS Farm established the\n16 group to do the translation job for documentations needed in a\n17 lawsuit.\n18 Q. And who was the lawsuit between?\n19 A. Between MOS Farm and the Phoenix Farm.\n20 Q. And who was in charge of the Phoenix Farm?\n21 A. At that time should be Sara Wei.\n22 Q. Now could you explain what sorts of documents were shared\n23 in the chat group that was created by MOS for this, at a high\n24 level. What sorts of documents were shared in that group?\n25 A. Just all kinds of loan project from all——from——I don't know\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 if all farms, but definitely from various farms of the world.\n2 Q. And who would send these documents to the chat group?\n3 A. Zhang Yongbing and Xia Qidong were in charge of this group.\n4 Zhang Yongbing and his assistant distributed this documentation\n5 to us to do the translation.\n6 MR. FERGENSON: Ms. Loftus, could we please publish\n7 what's in evidence as Government Exhibit 121.\n8 If we could publish it.\n9 Q. Ms. Wu, who is this?\n10 A. This is Zhang Yongbing.\n11 Q. And what was his role at the MOS Farm?\n12 A. He was the legal group leader in the MOS Farm at that time.\n13 Q. And what was his position in the farms after that?\n14 A. After that, he was ascended to the Himalaya Alliance and\n15 then to the Iron Blood Group.\n16 Q. Was——\n17 THE COURT: Does he go by any other name?\n18 THE WITNESS: Zhang Yongbing is his real name. His\n19 called name is Tang Gong Qi Xia (ph).\n20 Q. And Ms. Wu, could you spell Zhang Yongbing for the court\n21 reporter.\n22 A. Zhang Yongbing. Z-H-A-N-G, Y-O-N-G-B-I-N-G.\n23 Q. You said, Ms. Wu, he ascended to the Himalaya Alliance and\n24 the Iron Blood Group. What's the Iron Blood Group?\n25 A. It should be the core, the core of this organization, and\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 all members are Miles Guo's helpers.\n2 MR. FERGENSON: All right. Ms. Loftus, if we can now\n3 show just the witness what's marked as Government Exhibit VN7.\n4 Q. And Ms. Wu, you said Zhang Yongbing or his assistant shared\n5 the documents with this chat group, correct?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. Were some of the documents sent to you screenshots of text\n8 messages, Ms. Wu?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. Sorry. I didn't——is this document now on your screen?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Is this one of the documents that Zhang Yongbing or his\n13 assistant shared with the chat group?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 MR. FERGENSON: The government offers Government\n16 Exhibit VN7.\n17 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, voir dire?\n18 THE COURT: You may.\n19 VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION.\n20 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n21 Q. Ms. Wu, you didn't create this document, did you?\n22 A. No.\n23 Q. Do you know when the document was created?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. Do you know who created it? And to be clear, I'm asking\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 who created the document, not who were the——what are the names\n2 of the people that show up in the document.\n3 A. I don't know. Should be the Iron Blood Group people.\n4 Q. But you don't know.\n5 A. Because they do this, not——no others can do this.\n6 Q. I understand. I'm asking you what you know, not to\n7 speculate on what may have happened.\n8 A. Okay. I don't know.\n9 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor, she answered the question.\n10 MR. SCHIRICK: We object.\n11 THE COURT: Overruled. It is admitted.\n12 MR. FERGENSON: Could we publish this, please,\n13 Ms. Loftus.\n14 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n15 Q. All right. Now——\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, before Mr. Fergenson begins\n17 questioning, could we just have a brief sidebar?\n18 THE COURT: Yes.\n19 (Continued on next page)\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 (At the sidebar)\n2 MR. SCHIRICK: So your Honor, we have a continuing\n3 objection to this on the basis of hearsay and that it has\n4 Mandarin language in it. That's our objection.\n5 MR. FERGENSON: It's not hearsay. It was sent by an\n6 agent of Miles Guo to the MOS Farm; clearly a statement of an\n7 agent. Second, it's a screenshot of a text that Miles Guo was\n8 in. I don't see how it could be hearsay.\n9 On the Mandarin translation, I'm happy——the vast\n10 majority of this is in English. I'm happy to just ask her\n11 about the English-language portions. We don't have a lot of\n12 questions on this. And if we want, we can get the limited\n13 Mandarin text translated and send it to the defense. We can\n14 put that in evidence——\n15 THE COURT: So this came up before. Any Mandarin\n16 needs to be translated. So you'll hold off on this and my\n17 ruling is pending, shall we say.\n18 MR. FERGENSON: Okay. I'll just skip it.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: Just one point, your Honor. I believe\n20 the witness testified, notwithstanding what Mr. Fergenson\n21 described as the province of this document, this witness\n22 testified she has no idea who created it or where it came from.\n23 MR. FERGENSON: That's not true. She said it was\n24 shared in a chat that was sent to her within the chat and she\n25 downloaded it from that.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 MS. SHROFF: She never said she downloaded it and——\n2 MR. FERGENSON: Right. If you want me to ask her——\n3 MS. SHROFF: If I could just finish. She did not say\n4 she downloaded it and she did not say she created the document.\n5 We should just be clear about what the record is so far\n6 because——and we can always go back, but I don't believe there\n7 was any testimony whatsoever that she downloaded it.\n8 MR. FERGENSON: You're correct. I'm sorry.\n9 THE COURT: But she recognizes it.\n10 MS. SHROFF: I think she did say that. But she never\n11 said how that document was created, right? He asked her, who\n12 created the exhibit that's before you, so just——it's inaccurate\n13 to say she downloaded it.\n14 MR. FERGENSON: On the created, you don't have to\n15 create a document to be able to create a document. It was sent\n16 to her. I'm happy to ask her that.\n17 THE COURT: So we'll wait on the translation, but to\n18 the extent you have other ones, if it was sent to her and she\n19 recognizes it, it's going to come in.\n20 MR. SCHIRICK: We're making a hearsay objection, but\n21 we understand, your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: This is the statement of conspirators, or\n23 alleged conspirators. Let's go.\n24 (Continued on next page)\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 (In open court)\n2 THE COURT: You may continue.\n3 MR. FERGENSON: Thank you, your Honor.\n4 Okay. Ms. Loftus, could we show the witness now\n5 what's marked as Government Exhibit VN13.\n6 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n7 Q. And Ms. Wu, is this another document that was shared in\n8 that chat group?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 MR. FERGENSON: Government offers Government Exhibit\n11 VN13.\n12 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, voir dire?\n13 THE COURT: You may.\n14 VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION.\n15 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n16 Q. Ms. Wu, again, you didn't create this document, correct?\n17 A. Several people created together.\n18 Q. So my question was: Did you create the document?\n19 A. I did some.\n20 Q. You created some part of this document?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Okay. Do you know if this was the final version of this\n23 document?\n24 A. Can I move——move it?\n25 MR. FERGENSON: Ms. Loftus, if you want to scroll down\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 slightly.\n2 You can keep scrolling, Ms. Loftus.\n3 A. There is no grand total.\n4 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n5 Q. Okay. Do you know what the source of this information is,\n6 source of the information displayed in this document?\n7 A. You see the file number? Those file numbers just different\n8 screenshots that Zhang Yongbing distributed to us.\n9 Q. I'm sorry. Could you explain that again.\n10 A. The file number, that column, the file number column, MLP,\n11 all just——\n12 Q. Oh, file number. I see. Okay. Go ahead.\n13 A. Each one stands for one screenshot. We did the\n14 translation.\n15 Q. Okay. And my question was: Do you know what the source is\n16 of the financial information in this document?\n17 A. What do you mean source? Source from the screenshots they\n18 gave us, the screenshots they asked from different farms.\n19 MR. FERGENSON: And was the first exhibit we looked at\n20 an example of those screenshots?\n21 THE WITNESS: Yes, yes.\n22 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, same objection.\n23 THE COURT: You received this document in the chat,\n24 correct?\n25 THE WITNESS: Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n2 (Government's Exhibit VN13 received in evidence)\n3 MR. FERGENSON: Thank you, your Honor.\n4 We could publish it to the jury, just quickly.\n5 We can scroll up to the top.\n6 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n7 Q. So Ms. Wu, do you see in row 1 it says \"Note\" in red text?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. I'll just read the note. It says, \"Note: the following\n10 amounts have either been transferred or were confirmed by farm\n11 owners to have been transferred to Maywind.\"\n12 Ms. Wu, do you recall what——in Receiver column it says\n13 Maywind Trading LLC. Do you recall what that was?\n14 A. Should be one of the bank or bank accounts of the Phoenix\n15 Farm. It's just used to receive loan program funds from that\n16 farm members.\n17 MR. FERGENSON: Ms. Loftus, if we could scroll down\n18 towards the bottom, please. Keep going.\n19 Q. And Ms. Wu, do you see on this Excel it says the total is\n20 $39,872,527?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 MR. FERGENSON: All right. And Ms. Loftus——I'm sorry.\n23 If we could scroll back up quickly, just because we covered\n24 this when the jury didn't see it.\n25 Q. Under the column File Number, the column B, Ms. Wu——\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO1 Wu - Direct\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. ——do you see how there's numbers with MLP in the entries\n3 beneath that column?\n4 A. MLP.\n5 Q. Well, for example, in row 3 it says MLP 0011-7?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. Could you just explain again, while the jury can see it,\n8 what that is a reference to.\n9 A. M means Maywind.\n10 (Continued on next page)\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n2 Q. These file numbers, are these references to the sorts of\n3 screenshots we looked at first?\n4 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection.\n5 THE COURT: Sustained.\n6 A. Yes.\n7 THE COURT: You can't answer. The answer is stricken.\n8 Q. Could you explain what these are references to, Ms. Wu?\n9 A. \"M\" means Maywind. \"L\" means lawsuit. \"P\" means Phoenix\n10 Farm. And that four numbers up these letters identify\n11 different farm. For example, 0011 just MOS farm, Himalaya New\n12 York MOS.\n13 And seven, before this, Zhang Yongbing ask his\n14 assistant to send table to different farms to let the farm\n15 owner or related person to fill that table. That table\n16 included ten questions; such as, when did your farm started\n17 this loan program; when did your farm send the first amount to\n18 Maywind; how much total about your loan program, etc., etc. I\n19 cannot remember all of the ten questions. So according to each\n20 farm's answers about that table; one, just question one; two\n21 just question two. Here, seven, just for the question seven.\n22 The screenshot about that question seven included some money\n23 amount or bank information and just use those information to\n24 fill this form. Also, some farms also send some related bank\n25 statement wire transfer details.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could show the witness what's marked as\n2 Government Exhibit VN-12.\n3 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, same objection.\n4 MR. FERGENSON: I'll offer it in a moment, your Honor.\n5 Q. Is this the document that was shared in the chat group,\n6 Ms. Wu?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And by the way, Ms. Wu, the documents that were shared in\n9 the chat group that we looked at, did you provide these\n10 documents to the government?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 MR. FERGENSON: The government offers Government\n13 Exhibit VN-12.\n14 MR. SCHIRICK: Same objection.\n15 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n16 (Government's Exhibit VN-12 received in evidence)\n17 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n18 Q. All right. Ms. Loftus, maybe we can minimize the top bar\n19 so we can see more of this excel, and we could scroll up, if we\n20 could just scroll down slightly.\n21 Now, Ms. Wu, I want to focus you on row 37, where it\n22 says row zero to 35 and it gives a grand total. What's the\n23 grand total there listed in blue?\n24 A. Just added together the above transfer amount.\n25 Q. And does that say $106,489,540?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Now I want to scroll back up slightly, Ms. Loftus. We can\n3 just look at one example. You can go up to row 17.\n4 So, Ms. Wu, this row says the amount is $30.8 million.\n5 Do you see that?\n6 A. Mm hm.\n7 Q. And it says sender, and then there's a question mark, and\n8 then it says receiver and there's a question mark, and the\n9 receiver is Abu Dhabi. Do you see that?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Do you know why there are question marks here?\n12 A. All this information from screenshot from Sara. And in\n13 that screenshot, Sara just list these three to Abu Dhabi LA and\n14 G Service, but didn't mention where from, so question mark\n15 here.\n16 But we didn't have any details; for example, bank\n17 statement, wire transfer statement to show Abu Dhabi LA\n18 G Service, so question mark.\n19 Q. Do you know why money was sent to Abu Dhabi?\n20 A. I don't know.\n21 Q. You can take that down, Ms. Loftus.\n22 Now, Ms. Wu, do you know how if at all your $20,000\n23 was spent after you sent it to the MOS farm?\n24 A. I don't know.\n25 Q. Did you ever receive GTV stock for your loan?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 A. No.\n2 Q. Did you ever receive interest payments for your loan?\n3 A. No.\n4 Q. What, if anything, Ms. Wu, did Miles Guo say in his\n5 broadcast about using investor money for himself?\n6 A. No.\n7 Q. What did he say?\n8 A. He said nobody can touch our money, even a penny safe, all\n9 safe.\n10 Q. If you had known Miles Guo used investor money for personal\n11 expenses, would you have invested in the farm loan program?\n12 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection.\n13 THE COURT: You may answer.\n14 A. No.\n15 Q. Would you have invested in anything he promoted?\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection.\n17 THE COURT: You may answer.\n18 A. No.\n19 Q. Ms. Wu, did there come a time as you mention before when\n20 you asked for a refund of the farm loan program money you sent?\n21 A. September 2022.\n22 Q. And we'll talk about the timing, but did you get a refund?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. Did the refund include any interest?\n25 A. No.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 Q. Did the refund include any GTV stock?\n2 A. No.\n3 Q. When you requested your refund, who did you talk to about\n4 that in September 2022?\n5 A. First I contact G Series volunteer in the MOS farm, and she\n6 said she would contact Xia Qidong about this and then let me\n7 wait. I waited several weeks. Nothing happened, so I contact\n8 that volunteer again. And the volunteer said maybe Xia Qidong\n9 forgot about that, and she would ask him again. And later Xia\n10 Qidong contact me through email, and we talked several times.\n11 He ask some question, also let me sign a refund\n12 agreement about my bank account, and then he said he would give\n13 me a paper check, so later I got a paper check.\n14 Q. We'll come back to the timing of when you requested it.\n15 But let me ask, Ms. Wu, did there come a time when you sent\n16 money to G/Clubs?\n17 A. October 2020.\n18 Q. How much did you send to G/Clubs?\n19 A. 10,000.\n20 Q. Where did you send that money?\n21 A. G/Clubs Operating, LLC.\n22 Q. And what was the name on the account that you used to send\n23 the money to G/Club?\n24 A. Joint account.\n25 Q. And, Ms. Wu, why did you send $10,000 to G/Club?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 A. GTV stock.\n2 Q. Why would you think you would get GTV stock by sending\n3 money to G/Clubs?\n4 A. Miles Guo said.\n5 Q. Where did Miles Guo say that?\n6 A. In his video, maybe several videos.\n7 Q. Did you get GTV shares?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. What benefits, if any, did you get from your G/Clubs\n10 membership?\n11 A. I didn't get anything.\n12 Q. What's G Fashion, Ms. Wu?\n13 A. Miles Guo created that website to sell fashion such as\n14 clothes, jewelry.\n15 Q. And what connection, if any, was there between G Fashion\n16 and G/Clubs?\n17 A. If you have G/Club membership, you can get some kind of\n18 discount when you make purchase of G Fashion.\n19 Q. Did you ever buy G Fashion?\n20 A. No.\n21 Q. Why not?\n22 A. I don't like it, not my style, and ridiculously expensive.\n23 Q. So, Ms. Wu, why did you pay $10,000 for a G/Clubs\n24 membership?\n25 A. GTV stock.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection, asked and answered.\n2 THE COURT: Overruled.\n3 Q. Ms. Wu, did you ever request a refund of the money you sent\n4 to G/Clubs?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. Around when did you do that?\n7 A. December 2022.\n8 Q. You mentioned you requested a refund of the farm loan in\n9 September 2022 earlier?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Why did you wait until December of 2022 to ask for G/Club\n12 refund?\n13 A. Before the G/Club refund request, actually I ask for H Coin\n14 refund.\n15 Q. And so what was the timing? If you could walk us through\n16 the timing of your refund request, and we'll talk about H Coin\n17 in a moment?\n18 A. I felt loan program maybe the easiest one to ask for\n19 refund, so I did it first.\n20 Q. And why did you think the farm loan program would be\n21 easiest?\n22 A. Before I heard Xia Qidong was under government\n23 investigation and more and more investigation put on him, and I\n24 got a chance to translate some emails among Xia Qidong and some\n25 other MOS members. In those emails, they discuss about the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 loan program refund. At that time in those emails Xia Qidong\n2 behave a little reasonable, so I felt a good sign for me to go\n3 ahead.\n4 Q. And why didn't you ask for refunds from all the investment\n5 projects at the same time?\n6 A. I was afraid they just expel me from the farm, I would got\n7 nothing.\n8 Q. And why were you concerned about being expelled from the\n9 farm for asking for refunds?\n10 A. They do this. They did this a lot.\n11 Q. What did Alliance members call people who were expelled\n12 from the farms that way after asking for refunds?\n13 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection.\n14 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n15 A. CCP spy.\n16 Q. Ms. Wu, to bring you back to the G/Clubs refund request,\n17 how did you request your G/Clubs refund?\n18 A. I ask the farm first, but the farm said none of their\n19 business. I should go to G/Clubs to ask them. So I log on\n20 G/Club and ask the online agent. Then G/Club send me email to\n21 let me fill a refund request form. I filled it and submitted\n22 it, and nothing happen till now.\n23 Q. How often, if at all, were you emailing G/Clubs?\n24 A. In about a year, I wrote to them everyday.\n25 Q. Did you ever get an answer?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 A. Machine answers.\n2 Q. Do you recall what the machine answer said?\n3 A. Our staff will review your request, something like that.\n4 Q. Ms. Wu, did you ever get your G/Clubs money, the $10,000\n5 back?\n6 A. No.\n7 Q. Did you ever get, for this money transfer, did you ever get\n8 any shares in GTV or any other company?\n9 A. No.\n10 Q. Ms. Wu, what was the H Coin quota?\n11 A. It is complicated formula to calculate the number of\n12 H Coins you should get according to your previous investment,\n13 including your Rule of Law Foundation donation.\n14 Q. What was the price of each H Coin in someone's H Coin\n15 quota?\n16 A. 10 cent each coin.\n17 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could show the witness what's marked as\n18 Government Exhibit VN-37.\n19 What's this document, Ms. Wu?\n20 A. H Coin agreement.\n21 MR. FERGENSON: The government offers Government\n22 Exhibit VN-37.\n23 MR. SCHIRICK: No objection.\n24 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n25 (Government's Exhibit VN-37 received in evidence)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 Q. Is this your H Coin agreement, Ms. Wu?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. Which farm was it with?\n4 A. MOS farm.\n5 Q. And Ms. Loftus if we could zoom on the middle paragraph\n6 there, the larger paragraph.\n7 I'm not going to read the entirety of the paragraph,\n8 Ms. Wu, but how many H Coins were you in your H Coin quota?\n9 A. 44,500.\n10 Q. And what was the price of each of those H Coin?\n11 A. Ten cents each.\n12 Q. If we could zoom out and go to page six, Ms. Loftus,\n13 please.\n14 Did you sign this document, Ms. Wu?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. What was the date you signed it?\n17 A. October 28, 2021.\n18 Q. Who else signed it?\n19 A. Xia Qidong.\n20 Q. Let's zoom out, Ms. Loftus. And if we can go back up\n21 slightly to page two. And if we could zoom on paragraph five\n22 through the bottom. I'll just read a little bit of this,\n23 Ms. Wu.\n24 It says, a material term of this letter of agreement\n25 is that you hereby irrevocably consent fully and indefinitely\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 complying with the following warranties and undertakings. You\n2 warrant and confirm that you are a member of the HF, and\n3 therefore subscribe to the rules and ideology of the HF.\n4 And we can zoom out, go to page three, please. If we\n5 could zoom on the one through four Roman numerals. I'll read\n6 these, Ms. Wu.\n7 You undertake to not taking any action, endorsing any\n8 action or facilitating any action, whether directly or\n9 indirectly anything which is intended to or goes against the\n10 core values and ideals of HF. I'll skip ahead a little bit and\n11 reading II. It says, you undertake to not take any action --\n12 and skip ahead slightly -- which is intended to or could\n13 potentially hurt or damage the mission and ideology of HF.\n14 Number three says, You undertake to not demonstrate --\n15 skip ahead a little bit -- any support or benefit in any form\n16 to the Chinese Communist Party or CCP or any CCP officials.\n17 Number four says, You undertake to not take any action --\n18 skipping ahead -- which is intended to or could potentially\n19 hurt or damage the reputation or operation of the exchange.\n20 Ms. Wu, what's your understanding of what these means?\n21 A. Non-sense.\n22 Q. I'm sorry, Ms. Wu.\n23 A. I feel this is non-sense. I don't understand why write\n24 these terms.\n25 Q. What's your understanding of what happens if you criticize\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 the movement?\n2 MR. SCHIRICK: Asked and answered.\n3 THE COURT: Sustained.\n4 Q. If we could zoom out. If we could go back down to the\n5 signature page, page six.\n6 Now, Ms. Wu, you signed this October 28, 2021. Did\n7 you send money to pay for your H Coin quota?\n8 A. Actually, I paid for the H Coin in April 2021. I don't\n9 remember if I remember correctly, I don't remember at that time\n10 I had this agreement.\n11 Q. And about how many did you pay in April 2021?\n12 A. Less than $5,000.\n13 Q. Did you send -- withdrawn. We can go ahead and take this\n14 down for now, Ms. Loftus.\n15 Where did you send your a little less than $5,000 for\n16 the H Coin quota?\n17 A. They gave me a personal account to send my money into.\n18 Q. When you say they gave you, who gave you the personal\n19 account?\n20 A. Volunteer, G Series volunteer.\n21 Q. And what was the name on the account that you used to send\n22 the H Coin quota money?\n23 A. I don't remember, joint account or my own account.\n24 Q. Ms. Wu, why didn't you send the H Coin quota money directly\n25 to the Himalaya Exchange?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 A. They didn't give us any account related to Himalaya\n2 Exchange.\n3 Q. What was the Alliance Foundation?\n4 A. They said later, very later, just this is the foundation to\n5 hold our H Coins and do the digital currency operation to get\n6 better profit for us.\n7 Q. And did you, as a general matter, Ms. Wu, what's your\n8 understanding of who could invest directly, buy H Coins\n9 directly through the Himalaya exchange?\n10 A. Should be farm members who are not in America and Japan,\n11 maybe Canada. I don't remember, but definitely USA and Japan.\n12 Q. What, if any, commissions did you have to pay by not\n13 sending money directly to Himalaya Exchange?\n14 A. Five percent.\n15 Q. Where would that five percent commission go?\n16 A. I don't know.\n17 Q. Ms. Wu, why did you send this money in April 2021 to buy\n18 the H Coin quota?\n19 A. Miles Guo said that this digital currency would be the\n20 leading digital currency in the world in the future. At that\n21 time already many countries including famous financial\n22 institutions may interested in or may already bought those\n23 H Coins for themselves. So take your seats. This your chance,\n24 and then they used our previous investment to calculate the\n25 quota, so why not.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 Q. When you use the phrase \"Take your seats,\" that's something\n2 Miles Guo said. What was your understanding of what take your\n3 seats meant? What are you referring to?\n4 A. Not everyone has this chance. You are so lucky to have\n5 this chance so you cannot lose it anyway because you will never\n6 have this chance in your life anymore.\n7 Q. What, if anything, did Guo say about H Coins in gold?\n8 A. Excuse me.\n9 Q. What, if anything, did Guo say about H Coins and gold?\n10 A. He said Himalaya Exchange has 20 percent gold as the\n11 reserve.\n12 Q. And was this 20 percent gold reserve important to you?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Could you explain to the jury why that was important to\n15 you?\n16 A. First, if financial institution has this ability to buy 20\n17 percent gold as the reserve, this institution's financial\n18 ability should be very good.\n19 And second I have the impression that many banks in\n20 the world, including federal reserve, they all have gold as\n21 their reserve, so this sounds so formal.\n22 Q. Ms. Wu, did you ever have an account at the Himalaya\n23 Exchange?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. To your knowledge were there ever H Coins held in your name\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 or your account on the Himalaya Exchange?\n2 A. No.\n3 Q. Did you ever request that your H Coin quota money be\n4 returned?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. And around when did you do that?\n7 A. After the loan program refund, about October 2022.\n8 Q. Did you get that money back?\n9 A. Most part after almost half year.\n10 Q. And how much money did you receive back approximately?\n11 A. 4,500, around that.\n12 Q. Did you get back the five percent commission?\n13 A. No.\n14 Q. Did Miles Guo pay back what you lost?\n15 A. No.\n16 Q. Ms. Wu, you said at the beginning of your testimony you're\n17 no longer a follower of Miles Guo. What caused you to have\n18 doubts about the movement?\n19 A. First, the SEC, the settlement of GTV. Before SEC declared\n20 this, Miles Guo and his helpers never mention anything about\n21 this. Then the translation for that lawsuit. I got so many\n22 screenshots show so many things.\n23 For example, Sara Wei open more than 170 bank\n24 accounts. I just felt so weird about this. Is that normal? I\n25 don't know. Because at this time, I still trusted Miles Guo\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 and this organization, but I just felt some kind of a weird\n2 things here. Also before that I already felt not that free\n3 speech inside this group. People shouldn't criticize Miles Guo\n4 and people around him, close to him, you should be careful\n5 about what you said and what you wrote. So then later, I just\n6 heard government begin to investigate some people such as Xia\n7 Qidong. Also they were so reluctant to sign back this\n8 contracts to us, although those contracts have a lot of flaws\n9 inside. I don't know why.\n10 So little by little, I just -- also they send people\n11 to protest in front of homes and workplaces of those people who\n12 criticize Miles Guo with invoking pictures and language.\n13 Sometimes it turn to violence. Some people were sent to\n14 hospital because of this. Also, Miles Guo just use volunteers\n15 to death. I don't know why. Just the moments after moments,\n16 events by events, never stopped. Just left you no time to\n17 think others, no time to get touch with others. I heard Miles\n18 Guo said by himself in his video, one volunteer was send to\n19 hospital because of the overstress of the volunteer work. But\n20 Miles Guo said we shouldn't like CCP, just the manner of\n21 abusing people. This kind of abusing. I don't know why. Just\n22 volunteer, right. Why so hard?\n23 Also for H Coins. They said this would be the most\n24 secured digital currency in the world. One day they said,\n25 millions or tens of millions H Coins disappear, missing. They\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 couldn't locate them, okay. Also for the H Coin lockup.\n2 Before they promised for us who put those H Coins into famous\n3 digital currency institution, we could redeem our H Coins at\n4 any time as long as that institution already have our coins at\n5 least six months. Never happened.\n6 Actually, several months later, I don't remember exact\n7 time Miles Guo said they needed to lock our H Coins at least\n8 three years. Nobody can touch it. And before the arrest of\n9 Miles Guo, one Iron Blood Group member said we needed to lockup\n10 our H Coins maybe at least ten years. A lot of other things,\n11 just little by little.\n12 Q. Ms. Wu, to go back to a couple of things you said. One\n13 thing was the H Coin. Just so we understand the last thing you\n14 were discussing, what was the H Coin lockup?\n15 A. Just they didn't want people to get their money back from\n16 H Coin. This is my understanding. So they don't want you\n17 touch H Coin. You cannot get any money from them.\n18 Q. You also mentioned free speech and protest. What sorts of\n19 protests did you watch?\n20 A. I didn't like watch it, just listen to what they said about\n21 this protest. For example, SEC protest. One person who\n22 criticize Miles Guo a lot who is in Canada, they protest three\n23 times. Each time 10 days, 20 days. I don't remember exactly.\n24 And they using a lot of invoking pictures, also including\n25 neighbors, friends, family.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 Q. And what, if anything, did the Alliance say about people or\n2 call people who were being protested?\n3 MR. SCHIRICK: Asked and answered.\n4 THE COURT: Overruled. You can answer.\n5 A. You mean Miles Guo call them?\n6 Q. Yeah, what did Miles Guo call them?\n7 A. CCP spy.\n8 Q. And what effect did these sorts of -- this about CCP spies,\n9 what effect did that and the protest have on your doubts?\n10 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection, asked and answered.\n11 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n12 A. Why so many CCP spies around us, I don't know. I feel\n13 that's ridiculous.\n14 Q. Now, Ms. Wu, did Miles Guo ever talk about being targeted\n15 by the CCP?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. What sorts of things did he say?\n18 A. He said he was -- okay. He said the CCP wanted to kill\n19 him. He said CCP arrest his family and almost to him, but he\n20 escape it. He said CCP seized his property, his assets,\n21 something like that.\n22 Q. Ms. Wu, if it were true that Miles Guo was targeted by the\n23 CCP, does that change your view of the investment projects?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. Does it change your view of the movement?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu - Direct\n1 A. No.\n2 Q. Why doesn't it change your view?\n3 A. This movement just a scam. I don't think it's related\n4 anything to the CCP. Also if somebody is anti-CCP, it doesn't\n5 mean this guy could scam somebody else. That's different\n6 things. You cannot use this anti-CCP to do something illegal.\n7 Q. What do you mean by that?\n8 A. Just, for example, you scam money, now you said you scam\n9 money for anti-CCP. I just cannot understand. If you anti-CCP\n10 and you scam money, you think you better than the CCP?\n11 Q. Ms. Wu, overall did you make money or lose money from your\n12 investment?\n13 A. I lost some.\n14 Q. How much did you lose approximately?\n15 A. Around $15,000.\n16 Q. Did Miles Guo personally pay back the $15,000?\n17 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection.\n18 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n19 A. No.\n20 Q. Did you ever ask him one-on-one to do that?\n21 A. No.\n22 Q. Were you ever in one-on-one communication with him?\n23 A. No.\n24 Q. Ms. Wu, sitting here today are you still anti-CCP?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 Q. Do you still trust Miles Guo?\n2 A. No.\n3 Q. Why not?\n4 MR. SCHIRICK: Asked and answered, your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n6 A. He just a liar. He's very good at acting and cheating, but\n7 I feel he's not honest, reliable, credible, not a decent guy to\n8 be trusted in any way.\n9 MR. FERGENSON: No further questions.\n10 THE COURT: Cross examination.\n11 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n12 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n13 Q. Ms. Wu, you were born in China; is that right?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. You came to the US in 2001?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. And you have a postgraduate degree in computer science,\n18 right?\n19 A. Yes, master.\n20 Q. A master's in computer science. So you worked as a\n21 computer programmer?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And are you retired now?\n24 A. I retired myself.\n25 Q. Fair enough. And when did you retire?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. 2010.\n2 Q. And your husband, he still works?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And he works as a computer programmer?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. And where does he work?\n7 A. A medicine company.\n8 Q. That's okay. I'll move on.\n9 You said you first heard of Miles Guo in 2018, right?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Because you saw some of his videos online?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. And that was on YouTube?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And I believe you testified that in 2020 you started\n16 watching Mr. Guo's videos just about everyday?\n17 A. From one, two times a week to everyday, not from the\n18 beginning everyday.\n19 Q. Okay. But up to a point everyday?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And is it fair to say that his videos were anti-CCP in\n22 2020?\n23 A. He said something about CCP badness, that's it, and some\n24 kind of a gossip inside the CCP.\n25 Q. Right. The gossip you refer to is, he was exposing what he\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 believed were some of the secrets of the CCP, right?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. And now you were already anti-CCP before you were\n4 introduced to Mr. Guo's videos, right?\n5 A. At that time actually I maybe inside was, but I didn't\n6 realize that clearly.\n7 Q. And you had done some of your own research on the Chinese\n8 Communist Party around this time, right?\n9 THE COURT: Around what time.\n10 MR. SCHIRICK: Around 2020, your Honor.\n11 A. Actually before that from my family's history and\n12 experience, I already notice a lot about that. That is why\n13 when I watched Miles Guo video, I thought he said something\n14 true.\n15 Q. And your family experience was partially based on the fact\n16 that your parents were ill, right?\n17 A. My parents illness you mean?\n18 Q. Yes.\n19 A. Not only about that.\n20 Q. Well, in part is my question.\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. And you felt that they were not treated well in China when\n23 they were ill, right?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. And that was part of why you became anti-CCP even in your\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 mind, if not in action, right?\n2 A. Yeah, part.\n3 Q. What was the other part?\n4 A. My family's history.\n5 Q. And when you say your family history, do you mean something\n6 different than your parents' illness?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. Can you tell us what you mean by that?\n9 A. My father was sacrificed in fighting of the CCP when he was\n10 young.\n11 Q. Okay. Now, when you began participating in the movement,\n12 do you understand what I mean by the movement?\n13 A. Rules of law movement?\n14 Q. Yes.\n15 A. Okay.\n16 Q. When you began participating in the movement, you didn't\n17 expect that your participation would lead to the overthrow of\n18 the CCP, right?\n19 A. Miles Guo said.\n20 Q. I'm asking, ma'am, what you thought, what you believed.\n21 A. If can do that, good. If cannot, at least do something.\n22 Q. Did you believe that your participation would overthrow the\n23 CCP?\n24 A. Maybe.\n25 Q. Did you believe that the Rules of Law movement could\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 overthrow the CCP?\n2 A. Maybe.\n3 Q. Okay. Fair enough. But you didn't necessarily expect that\n4 it would overthrow the CCP, right?\n5 A. Anything possible, so who knows.\n6 Q. My question is, you didn't necessarily expect that to be\n7 the case?\n8 THE COURT: Asked and answered. Move on.\n9 Q. In fact, you recall telling the government that you\n10 participated because you thought it would help wake people up,\n11 correct?\n12 A. At this time, yes.\n13 Q. Help them to wake up to how the CCP operates?\n14 A. At least to let people know more.\n15 Q. Sure. And help them understand the truth, right?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. Now do you still have family in China?\n18 A. You mean close family, not relatives?\n19 Q. Any family.\n20 A. Cousin, uncle, something like that.\n21 Q. And how about your husband, does he have family in China as\n22 well?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. Do you speak with them? Are you in touch with them?\n25 A. My husband's family, actually they have dialect I could not\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 understand. They're language, I could not understand. They\n2 have some dialects.\n3 Q. Have you visited anyone in China since you left in 2001?\n4 A. 2001, yes.\n5 Q. And when did you return to China?\n6 A. I went there a lot of times.\n7 Q. You visited a lot of times?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. I just want to go through them. Tell me when you visited?\n10 A. Almost every year.\n11 Q. About once a year since 2001?\n12 A. Yes. Maybe not the first two years, but after that.\n13 Q. And so in the year 2000, you visited at least one?\n14 A. 2000?\n15 Q. I'm sorry, 2020.\n16 A. Not COVID-19. I mean before COVID-19.\n17 Q. Before Covid 19. Okay. Fair enough. In 2019, you visited\n18 at least once?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Was it more than once?\n21 A. Sometime more than once.\n22 Q. And how about since Covid, have you been back?\n23 A. Since?\n24 Q. Mm hm.\n25 A. My father dead. I don't want to go back.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 Q. So you haven't been back since Covid?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. In preparation for your testimony here today, you met with\n4 the government lawyers and agents on a number of occasions,\n5 right?\n6 A. Several times.\n7 Q. Several times?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Do you remember how many times?\n10 A. I didn't count it.\n11 Q. Well, let's see if we can bill out a list.\n12 Do you recall having a telephone interview with the\n13 FBI at the end of November of 2022?\n14 A. 2022, maybe. I can not remember the time.\n15 Q. Do you remember when the first time was that you spoke to\n16 members of the FBI or the department of justice?\n17 A. I don't remember, but, yes.\n18 Q. Approximately 2022?\n19 A. Yeah, 2022, I don't remember the time.\n20 Q. End of 2022?\n21 A. You mean twice?\n22 Q. Meaning toward the end of 2022.\n23 A. Maybe.\n24 Q. How about in January of 2024?\n25 A. What happened?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 Q. I'm asking you, did you meet with representative of the\n2 U.S. government?\n3 A. Maybe.\n4 Q. Mr. Fergenson here who questioned you earlier today by\n5 Webex?\n6 A. I don't remember, January or February. I'm not sure.\n7 Q. What about in April of 2024, did you have an in-person\n8 interview with Mr. Fergenson?\n9 A. You mean online?\n10 Q. No, an interview with him in person.\n11 A. Face-to-face?\n12 Q. Either way.\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And then again in mid-May, May 17?\n15 A. Mid-May 17?\n16 Q. Mm hm.\n17 A. Face-to-face, in-person?\n18 Q. Either way, ma'am. We'll just say any kind of meeting,\n19 whether it was virtual --\n20 A. I just remember --\n21 Q. Just let me finish. Whether it's an in-person meeting or\n22 virtual meeting or phone call. That's what I mean by meeting\n23 with the government.\n24 A. I don't remember May 17, no.\n25 Q. You don't remember meeting with them in May?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. I met Mr. Fergenson in May, I can't remember that time\n2 because we met May 26. That's just around Memorial Day so I\n3 can remember that.\n4 Q. That was my next fix question. So, fine, you met with him\n5 then. And then again on June 11, right, two days ago?\n6 A. Today 13? Yes.\n7 Q. And then again yesterday in preparation for testimony?\n8 A. Yesterday?\n9 Q. Did you meet with him yesterday?\n10 A. Said hello, is that kind of a meeting?\n11 Q. That I think would qualify as a meeting. You said hello?\n12 A. Yes. When you just meet somebody say hello, that's still\n13 normal.\n14 Q. Great. That's a total of seven meeting, right?\n15 A. I don't know. If you say seven, okay seven. I did not\n16 count it.\n17 Q. Either way you met with him on numerous occasions, right?\n18 A. Numerous, no, several times.\n19 Q. Okay. And in addition during the time that you met with\n20 him, and even before, you forwarded the government numerous\n21 emails, right?\n22 A. Several, should not be numerous.\n23 Q. About how many would you say?\n24 A. I don't remember.\n25 Q. You don't remember, but it was several, not numerous?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. You see, you cannot submit as many. You can't because they\n2 limit the size and the number you can submit, so definitely not\n3 numerous.\n4 Q. Okay. So you forwarded this information to try to help\n5 them, right?\n6 A. Help everybody.\n7 Q. You forwarded the information to try to help the U.S.\n8 government, right?\n9 MR. FERGENSON: Asked and answered.\n10 THE COURT: Well, you've gone from him to the U.S.\n11 government, so you may answer.\n12 A. I think help everybody.\n13 Q. Are you helping Miles Guo?\n14 A. Yeah.\n15 Q. You are?\n16 A. Just make him stop to do something bad.\n17 Q. Okay. Noted.\n18 Now, you testified on direct about making an\n19 investment in GTV, right?\n20 A. Through VOG.\n21 Q. And you invested $14,000, right?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And that was an investment with Sara Wei, right?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. And this wasn't the first time that you had purchased\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 stock, right?\n2 A. Can I just understand, Sara Wei kind of brokerage, stock\n3 brokerage. If this way, this is the first time.\n4 Q. My question was different. This wasn't the first time that\n5 you purchased stock, right?\n6 You have other investments? You have other stock\n7 investments, right?\n8 A. Purchase online, yeah.\n9 Q. Now, you knew that there was some risk associated with\n10 purchasing a stock, right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Every investment has some risk, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And, in fact, even Mr. Guo you recall him saying that\n15 investing is always a little risky, right?\n16 A. But he also said he guarantee every penny.\n17 Q. I would like you to listen to my question.\n18 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor, she's answering the\n19 question.\n20 MR. SCHIRICK: It's non-responsive, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: Just stick to the question and don't offer\n22 additional question.\n23 MR. SCHIRICK: Could we please have the court reporter\n24 read back the question.\n25 (Record was read)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 THE COURT: You may answer.\n2 A. As far as I can remember, he said this very late, not at\n3 the very beginning.\n4 Q. But he said it, right, you remember him saying it?\n5 A. He ask about our investment. At that time he didn't say\n6 this.\n7 Q. Okay. Now, you never spoke with Mr. Guo directly about\n8 your investment before you made it, right?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. You only communicated with Sara Wei, right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Or people who worked for her, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And, in fact, you sent your $14,000 to Ms. Wei, right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. And as you testified to on direct, I believe you sent it in\n17 a few different transactions?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. And those transactions were between approximately May 21\n20 and 29, 2020, right?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. And some of those transfers were in fact to Ms. Wei's\n23 personal bank account, correct?\n24 A. She gave that account to me.\n25 Q. She gave you that account and you sent it to her?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. And some were to a VOG bank account, right?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And the ones that went to the VOG bank account, again to be\n5 clear, Ms. Wei told you to send those there, right?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. Now Mr. Guo didn't provide any specifics about where to\n8 send that money, right?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. All the specific instructions came from Ms. Wei?\n11 A. But Ms. Wei and a lot of other guys, they made a lot of\n12 videos in which they said, it was Miles Guo who give us this\n13 opportunities, so we should show our gratitude to Miles Guo\n14 forever. And Miles Guo will create more similar opportunities\n15 for us to invest in later.\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, move to strike as\n17 non-responsive.\n18 THE COURT: So once again, if you listen carefully to\n19 the question and only answer what is being asked. So if he\n20 asks you, what is your favorite color. Then you can answer\n21 whatever it is, blue, red, yellow. But you wouldn't say, and\n22 my favorite flower is the rose. Don't add additional\n23 information. So the prior answer is stricken.\n24 Q. All the specific instructions about where to send money\n25 came from Sara Wei, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Now, do you recall when the GTV private placement closed?\n3 A. June.\n4 Q. June. June 2nd?\n5 A. I don't remember.\n6 Q. Can we just please pull up what's in evidence as Government\n7 Exhibit Z9 and go to the June 2, 2020 entry. I believe it's\n8 page six.\n9 Now, Ms. Wu, do you see what's displayed in the screen\n10 in front of you?\n11 A. You mean the picture?\n12 Q. Correct.\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Do you recognize that as a screen capture from a video?\n15 A. Miles Guo.\n16 Q. Do you recognize that as a screen capture from a video?\n17 A. Maybe, yes.\n18 Q. Do you recognize this as a video that Mr. Guo posted when\n19 the GTV private placement ended in June of 2020?\n20 A. I don't remember that date, but he did that.\n21 Q. But you do recall this video?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. You recall seeing a video?\n24 A. Maybe the same, maybe the same. I'm not sure, but yes.\n25 Q. Now, you testified earlier that during this period you were\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 watching Mr. Guo's videos pretty regularly, right?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. So you recall seeing this video. Do you believe you saw it\n4 around the time that it was posted?\n5 A. You said June 2nd, but I don't remember. I just remember\n6 in June.\n7 Q. So, ma'am, I'm not asking you about the specific date.\n8 My question is, do you remember seeing it around the\n9 time that it was posted?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Thank you. We can take that down.\n12 Now, you testified that you were refunded 92 percent\n13 of the $14,000 that you sent to Sara Wei; is that right?\n14 A. From SEC, yes.\n15 Q. I want to go back to Sara Wei for a second.\n16 Can you tell us who is Sara Wei?\n17 A. She is the earliest, maybe earliest, maybe, I'm not sure,\n18 but from my understanding she is the earliest person who\n19 cooperated with Miles Guo.\n20 Q. And did a time come when Sara Wei had a falling out with\n21 Mr. Guo?\n22 A. 2021 I guess. I cannot remember exactly. That is why\n23 there was that lawsuit MOS farm to Phoenix.\n24 Q. Thank you. We'll get there in a second. So you do recall\n25 a time when they had a falling out?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. Approximately, not exactly.\n2 Q. Again, ma'am, I'm not asking you the exact time. I'm just\n3 asking you if you recall that they had a falling out?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Now, I believe you just started to talk about a lawsuit\n6 that resulted from that falling out, correct?\n7 A. The lawsuit you mean result from a fallen breakup?\n8 Q. From the breakup, yes, that followed the breakup?\n9 A. Yes, follow.\n10 Q. And that was a lawsuit that the farms brought against Sara\n11 Wei and her farm, right?\n12 A. Sara Wei at that time already broke up with Miles Guo, so\n13 I'm not sure if Miles Guo at that time still keep her at that\n14 farm leader.\n15 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, move to strike as\n16 non-responsive.\n17 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor, I think she's trying to\n18 answer it very carefully but answering the question.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, the answer is totally not\n20 responsive to the question.\n21 THE COURT: The answer is stricken.\n22 Q. The lawsuit was brought by the farms against Sara Wei's\n23 farm and Sara Wei?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Now, you're aware that the Mountain of Spices farm, MOS\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 farm I believe you referred to it on direct, sued Sara Wei for\n2 stealing funds that supporters had put into the farm loans\n3 program, right?\n4 A. Should be.\n5 Q. Yes?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. And that lawsuit was in 2021, right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And where was that lawsuit if you remember?\n10 A. I think Texas.\n11 Q. And you provided translation services to the MOS farm in\n12 support of that lawsuit, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And the result of that lawsuit -- withdrawn.\n15 You're aware of the result of that lawsuit?\n16 A. No.\n17 Q. So you're not aware that the result of that lawsuit was a\n18 default judgment against Ms. Wei?\n19 A. No, but I --\n20 MR. FERGENSON: Objection, your Honor. She said she\n21 doesn't know.\n22 THE COURT: Asked and answered.\n23 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, I believe she was still in\n24 the process of answering it. It may have jogged her\n25 recollection.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 MR. FERGENSON: That's not correct. She said no.\n2 THE COURT: The answer was no.\n3 Q. Now, you were asked some questions about some government\n4 exhibits by Mr. Fergenson earlier today, right?\n5 A. Today, no.\n6 Q. You don't recall testifying on direct and being shown those\n7 spreadsheets?\n8 A. Oh, you mean here, yes.\n9 Q. Yes, here, today just a few minutes ago. Okay.\n10 Now, did you have an agreement with the MOS farm to\n11 provide translation services in connection with that lawsuit\n12 against Ms. Wei?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor, may we have a sidebar?\n15 THE COURT: All righty. Step up.\n16 (Continued on next page)\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 (At sidebar)\n2 MR. FERGENSON: I'm not sure where this line of\n3 questioning is going, but the reason for my request, your\n4 Honor, is the witness signed an NDA with the MOS farm. And I\n5 assume, but I just wanted to confirm, we're not going anywhere\n6 where Mr. Schirick is going to suggest she's going to get sued\n7 or retaliated against for breaching the NDA. I assume that's\n8 not the case. I don't know where we're going with it.\n9 MR. SCHIRICK: You assume correct. That's not where\n10 I'm going with this.\n11 THE COURT: Okay.\n12 (Continued on next page)\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 (In open court; jury present)\n2 THE COURT: You may continue.\n3 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n4 Q. So that agreement that you had with the MOS farm was to\n5 provide translation services, right?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. And it was to provide translation services in support of\n8 the MOS farm's lawsuit against Ms. Wei?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. And that's why you had access to the spreadsheets that you\n11 testified about earlier today, right?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. Now, if we could please bring up Government Exhibit\n14 GXVN-12. If we could scroll up a little, please, or down.\n15 That's fine. Thank you.\n16 Now, Ms. Wu, you recognize this as the document that\n17 you looked at a few minutes ago when Mr. Fergenson was asking\n18 you questions?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. And I'd like to just focus you on the line 17 that\n21 Mr. Fergenson focused you on where there's a reference to Abu\n22 Dhabi?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. You see that?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 Q. Now, you don't know that any money was actually sent to Abu\n2 Dhabi, right?\n3 A. From that screenshot, the money amount on that screenshot.\n4 Q. My question is, you don't know yourself that money was\n5 actually sent to Abu Dhabi, right?\n6 A. We just do the calculation, so I don't know.\n7 Q. Right. You just did the translation, right?\n8 A. Calculation here, calculation for the number.\n9 Q. Sure. Now, there's also a question mark next to Abu Dhabi,\n10 right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Do you know why that's there?\n13 A. Because Sara didn't provide us the detail, just that\n14 screenshot for the amount and the destination.\n15 Q. So you didn't have the details, and we don't know if money\n16 was actually sent to Abu Dhabi, right?\n17 MR. FERGENSON: Objection to form.\n18 THE COURT: Compound question. If you want to break\n19 it up.\n20 Q. So you didn't have the details, right?\n21 A. At least I haven't. I don't know others.\n22 Q. Right. You didn't have the details, right?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 THE COURT: Asked and answered.\n25 Q. And the whole point of putting together this information\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 that's in this spreadsheet was to support the lawsuit against\n2 Ms. Wei, right?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And the other spreadsheets that we looked at were also for\n5 the purpose of supporting the lawsuit against Ms. Wei, right?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. Because she had been accused of taking the money, right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, I was going to move to\n10 another topic. This maybe a good stopping point if we're doing\n11 11:30.\n12 THE COURT: We're going to go to noon.\n13 MR. SCHIRICK: I'm sorry. I didn't realize that.\n14 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n15 Q. We can take that down.\n16 Now, you testified earlier today that you were a\n17 member of the MOS farm, right?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. And approximately when did you join the MOS farm?\n20 A. Maybe May or June 2020.\n21 Q. And that farm was located here in New York, right?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And at the time you joined in May or June of 2020, you\n24 began doing volunteer work, right?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 Q. And you did the translation work that we just talked about?\n2 A. Not this one at the beginning.\n3 Q. What kind of work did you do at the beginning?\n4 A. There was a translation group in the farm, so I joined that\n5 group to do some news translation they ask it.\n6 Q. Any other kinds of volunteer work?\n7 A. Modify some other people's articles.\n8 Q. And were there other people doing volunteer work?\n9 A. You mean what other --\n10 Q. Other members of the farm doing volunteer work?\n11 A. A lot of, yeah.\n12 Q. A lot of people. What kinds of volunteer work were other\n13 people doing?\n14 A. Video.\n15 Q. Video recording?\n16 A. Just like media. They also had workout group. I don't\n17 know what they do, just workout, some exercises, workout group,\n18 religion group, patrol group, just to do patrol to see if\n19 somebody said something not good just delayed or maybe expel\n20 from other farm.\n21 THE COURT: What was the name of that group?\n22 THE WITNESS: Patrol.\n23 THE COURT: How do you spell that?\n24 THE WITNESS: P-A-T-R-O-L.\n25 THE COURT: Patrol.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 THE WITNESS: Patrol.\n2 A. And financial group, legal group, education group.\n3 Q. And what did the education group do?\n4 A. Educate people.\n5 Q. Can you explain that any further?\n6 A. I don't know. I don't know that group, what they were\n7 doing. I don't know.\n8 Q. Anything else?\n9 A. Writing, but the writing is not like any other group, just\n10 a lot of groups had writing group inside.\n11 Q. Make sense. Now, a time came as you testified on direct\n12 that you made a loan to the farm, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And that was in August of 2020?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. For $20,000 right?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. And Mr. Fergenson showed you the loan agreement, right?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. So if we could just pull up that loan agreement GXVN-39.\n21 Now, you testified that you can't recall if you read\n22 the loan agreement before you signed it, right?\n23 A. I really don't remember because it so hurry at that time.\n24 I read it long time ago.\n25 Q. Sure. But you can't recall whether it was before or after\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 that you read it, right?\n2 A. Yeah.\n3 Q. So it's possible that you read it before, right?\n4 THE COURT: Don't ask her to speculate.\n5 MR. SCHIRICK: It's a logical conclusion.\n6 THE COURT: Don't testify.\n7 Q. You also testified that you recall Mr. Guo saying at some\n8 point that the proceeds from these loans would go to purchase\n9 GTV stock, right?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Now, don't you recall that he said that after you signed\n12 this agreement?\n13 A. I don't remember, that long time ago.\n14 Q. Now, isn't it true you recall Mr. Guo saying that the money\n15 loan through the loan program was for the farm?\n16 A. He said interest to the farm. I don't know what does that\n17 mean, just I remember it like this.\n18 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, move to strike as\n19 non-responsive.\n20 THE COURT: Well, I think the first sentence is\n21 responsive with respect to interest, and so the second part\n22 will be stricken.\n23 Q. Now, you recall telling the government that you understood\n24 that the farm could use the money in any project it wanted,\n25 right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. Xia Qidong said that.\n2 Q. My question is, do you recall telling the government that\n3 that was your understanding?\n4 A. I don't remember.\n5 Q. Okay. Let's see if we can refresh your recollection. Can\n6 we put up for the parties and the witness 3620-10, page three.\n7 Now, Ms. Wu, if you could just read what's in front of\n8 you or should be in front of you momentarily to yourself, not\n9 out loud, and let me know when you're done?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Does that remind you that that is in fact what you told the\n12 government?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. So it is true that you told the government that it was your\n15 understanding that the farm could use the money to invest in\n16 any project that it wanted, right?\n17 A. Yes, but not the contract time.\n18 Q. Speaking of the contract, why don't we go back to the\n19 contract. If we could just zoom in on 1A in the contract, Use\n20 of proceeds.\n21 Now, this sentence says, Use of proceeds. The loan\n22 proceeds advanced under this agreement is for the general\n23 working capital purposes of the borrower. Do you see that?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Who is the borrower under this agreement?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. MOS farm.\n2 Q. We can take that down or just zoom back out. Keep the\n3 exhibit up, but zoom back out. If we could go to the interest\n4 rate section, and this says that the interest rate would be\n5 three percent per annum on the loan amount payable in full on\n6 the final maturity date. Do you see that?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And then if we can zoom in on final maturity date. It\n9 says, final maturity date 36 months from the effective date.\n10 Do you see that?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Do you understand that maturity date means when the loan\n13 payment becomes due?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And so the loan payment isn't due before the maturity date,\n16 right?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. Now, you expected to get interest on the loan, right?\n19 A. Because at that time somebody already got the three percent\n20 when I ask for the refund.\n21 MR. SCHIRICK: Move to strike as non-responsive.\n22 Q. You can't tell me what other people told you. I'm asking\n23 what your understanding was at the time.\n24 THE COURT: Sustained.\n25 A. I understand it, so I just feel unfair why someone else.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 Q. I'm sorry. Can you speak up.\n2 A. I understand it.\n3 Q. You understood that it was for interest, right, the farm\n4 loan was for interest?\n5 A. So why not me?\n6 Q. That's may question. So you expected interest?\n7 A. So, I don't want it.\n8 MR. SCHIRICK: Move to strike, your Honor.\n9 Q. I'm asking you if at the time you signed this agreement you\n10 expected to earn interest?\n11 A. Actually, at that time just the three percent surprise me,\n12 because before Miles Guo said six percent.\n13 MR. SCHIRICK: Again, your Honor. Move to strike.\n14 THE COURT: Both answers are stricken. I want you to\n15 listen carefully to the question, and you may read back the\n16 question, and answer just what's being asked.\n17 (Record was read)\n18 A. Not really.\n19 Q. Ma'am, when you met with the government, do you recall\n20 telling them that you were upset that you didn't get interest?\n21 A. No.\n22 Q. Let's see if we can help with that. Can we please pull up\n23 --\n24 MR. FERGENSON: Objection to the commentary, your\n25 Honor.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 THE COURT: Don't testify. Ask her if there is\n2 anything that would refresh her recollection.\n3 Q. Would it be possible if we could show you a document to\n4 help refresh your memory?\n5 A. I'm not sure.\n6 MR. SCHIRICK: May we, your Honor?\n7 THE COURT: You may.\n8 Q. Please pull up 3620-10 at three. While we're waiting for\n9 that, it was your impression that others had been paid\n10 interest, right?\n11 A. I knew some, yes.\n12 Q. And based on that you expected to be paid interest?\n13 A. No.\n14 Q. You didn't expect to be paid interest? Others got it, but\n15 you didn't expect to get interest?\n16 THE COURT: Asked and answered.\n17 Q. Now, isn't it true that under the loan agreement the loan\n18 amount and any accrued interest is paid on that maturity date,\n19 right?\n20 MR. FERGENSON: Asked and answered.\n21 THE COURT: You may answer that question. Actually,\n22 no. I do recall your asking the question, so the objection is\n23 sustained.\n24 Q. Now, Ms. Wu, you sought to terminate the loan agreement\n25 before the maturity date, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO2 Minran Wu\n1 A. Yes, I sought it. Somebody did it, so I sought it.\n2 Q. In fact, you did terminate the loan agreement before the\n3 maturity date, right?\n4 A. Yes, follow examples.\n5 Q. And based on that, you're not entitled to any interest,\n6 right? We just read the contract, right?\n7 A. Yeah.\n8 Q. Is it your understanding that based on your early\n9 termination you are not entitled to interest?\n10 MR. FERGENSON: To the extent it doesn't call for a\n11 legal conclusion, no objection.\n12 THE COURT: Her understanding, but obviously not a\n13 legal conclusion. You may answer what your understanding is.\n14 A. My understanding for that at that time when I ask for the\n15 refund, I just feel this is illegal so I don't want the three\n16 percent interest anymore that illegal money.\n17 Q. You testified on direct that you didn't get your three\n18 percent interest, right?\n19 A. I said that because they didn't show any intention to give\n20 me, so I didn't get and I also don't want that.\n21 (Continued on next page)\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 MR. SCHIRICK: Move to strike, your Honor.\n2 MR. FERGENSON: I mean, your Honor, we've covered it\n3 as well, so maybe we can move——\n4 THE COURT: The answer is stricken.\n5 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n6 Q. Now you entered into a release of the loan agreement,\n7 right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And the farm in fact refunded your loan; you received all\n10 $20,000 back, right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Okay. Now nowhere in the agreement that we looked at, that\n13 we just reviewed, does it say that you would get GTV stock for\n14 your $20,000 loan to the farm, right?\n15 A. They use the GTV stock to allure me to buy, to go with this\n16 loan program, so yes, I understand no GTV on the contract,\n17 but——\n18 Q. It doesn't say GTV stock anywhere in the contract, right?\n19 A. So that is a scam.\n20 Q. Right. And then in fact, you recall telling the government\n21 during one of your meetings with them that Mr. Guo said that\n22 the farm money is for the farm, not just TV, just——pardon me.\n23 Withdrawn.\n24 You recall telling the government during one of your\n25 meetings with them that Mr. Guo said that the farm loan money\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 is for the farm——\n2 MR. FERGENSON: I believe asked and answered.\n3 Q. ——not for GTV.\n4 MR. FERGENSON: I believe asked and answered.\n5 THE COURT: I'll allow her to answer the question.\n6 A. Not on the contract time; later they said that.\n7 Q. My question is: Do you recall telling the government that\n8 that's your understanding at the time?\n9 A. I told the government, but I didn't at the time, at that\n10 time. I mean, I should tell the government they just said this\n11 later, the contract, so——\n12 Q. That's not what you told the government, right?\n13 THE COURT: She's testified as to what she told the\n14 government.\n15 A. Because the government didn't ask that.\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: There's no question pending, your\n17 Honor.\n18 MR. FERGENSON: Well, then he's just arguing with the\n19 witness, so——\n20 THE COURT: Move on.\n21 Q. Now you testified earlier that you invested through a\n22 company called Wonder Invest; is that right?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. And that company was set up by your husband, right?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Q. Now did you talk to your husband about the farm loan before\n2 you made it?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. Did your husband review the contract?\n5 A. The con——the Wonder Invest is mine at that time.\n6 Q. Ma'am, my question is: Did your husband review the\n7 contract?\n8 A. This is my contract. Why I need my husband to review the\n9 contract? I don't understand this question.\n10 Q. It's a simple question. He either did or didn't review it.\n11 So my question is: Did he review it at the time?\n12 A. I told him by myself. He didn't review, but I told him.\n13 Q. Okay. But you told him about it.\n14 A. Yeah.\n15 Q. Okay. Now you testified that——withdrawn.\n16 Now you actually received your refund of the farm loan\n17 money before you made your first complaint to the government;\n18 is that right?\n19 A. Yes. I don't remember the time I complained to the\n20 government. It may be, yes.\n21 MR. SCHIRICK: Okay. Now I'd just like to go back\n22 briefly to GX VN39. And if we could go to page——to the\n23 addendum that's at the end of this document.\n24 And scroll to the bottom but not——but excluding the\n25 last page. One more down, please.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 There we go.\n2 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n3 Q. Now you recall being shown this document by Mr. Fergenson?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Okay. And Mr. Fergenson pointed out that the loan\n6 agreement was signed in November of 2021 by a representative of\n7 the farm, right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And this is signed, this addendum is signed by you around\n10 the same time, right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Like three days later.\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Right.\n15 MR. SCHIRICK: And if we go back to the first page of\n16 the addendum, please.\n17 Q. And this addendum that you signed more than a year later,\n18 after signing the first loan contract, you testified you didn't\n19 review this one either?\n20 A. Almost not.\n21 Q. So you did review it to some extent.\n22 A. I just reviewed it where I should fill in——for example, my\n23 name, the time.\n24 Q. Okay. And you reviewed it and you actually included a——and\n25 we're not going to display this, but you included a copy of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 your driver's license, as well, right?\n2 A. They ask it.\n3 Q. Sure. That's what was asked for, right?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Okay. So you had the time to fill it in and make a copy of\n6 your driver's license. And now did you send this back by\n7 email?\n8 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor, objection to testifying.\n9 If he has a question about that, he can ask it.\n10 THE COURT: I'm waiting for the question.\n11 Q. The question is: Did you return this by email?\n12 A. I don't remember. Maybe to G service volunteer.\n13 THE COURT: What is that, G service volunteer?\n14 THE WITNESS: Oh, sorry. G series, G series. A lot\n15 of G, GTV, G Fashion, G Club, it's all together, G series.\n16 THE COURT: Please continue.\n17 Q. And so it's possible that you handed this in hard copy to\n18 another person?\n19 A. No.\n20 THE COURT: So don't ask her what might be possible.\n21 Ask her what happened.\n22 Q. Do you recall whether you did that? Did you hand it in\n23 hard copy to another person?\n24 A. Not hand, not by hand. Not by hand.\n25 Q. Then how did you convey it, ma'am?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 MR. FERGENSON: Asked and answered.\n2 MR. SCHIRICK: Just trying to understand how it was\n3 sent back.\n4 THE COURT: You've already asked the question.\n5 Q. So is it your testimony that at no point after signing this\n6 addendum you reviewed it more carefully?\n7 A. No.\n8 Q. You never reviewed it.\n9 A. I reviewed some.\n10 Q. Okay.\n11 A. Just the 3 percent, like that.\n12 Q. Now you testified that there was some time pressure on you\n13 with respect to the original loan agreement. There wasn't any\n14 time pressure on you with respect to this addendum, was there?\n15 A. Yeah.\n16 Q. There was?\n17 A. My family issue. My family issue.\n18 Q. So there wasn't any time pressure put on you by Mr. Guo.\n19 Right?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Right? No time pressure put on you by anybody at the\n22 farms, right?\n23 A. They asked several days to return it.\n24 Q. Sure. Do you think several days is enough time to review a\n25 four-page contract?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 A. If carefully, one by one, word by word, not enough.\n2 Q. Four days isn't enough to review a four-page contract?\n3 MR. FERGENSON: Asked and answered.\n4 THE COURT: Asked and answered, and don't testify.\n5 MR. SCHIRICK: Okay. Okay.\n6 Q. Now when did you, according to you, first review either the\n7 loan agreement or the addendum, in detail?\n8 A. Can you repeat that again.\n9 Q. Sure.\n10 THE COURT: Are you asking when did she make a\n11 thorough review of the contract?\n12 MR. SCHIRICK: Yes, your Honor.\n13 THE COURT: And the addendum?\n14 MR. SCHIRICK: Correct, your Honor.\n15 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.\n16 A. You mean carefully review of this?\n17 Q. That's right. That's the question.\n18 A. Not one by one. Maybe just some.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: Move to strike, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: The answer is stricken. The question is\n21 when.\n22 THE WITNESS: When. I cannot remember when.\n23 Q. Okay. Did you ever review it carefully, before you met\n24 with the prosecutors?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Q. When was that, approximately?\n2 A. Around the time I asked a refund.\n3 Q. Around the time you asked——you planned to ask for a refund,\n4 right?\n5 A. Yeah.\n6 Q. Okay. And were you surprised by what was in there?\n7 A. Not exactly that surprised.\n8 Q. Yeah, not that surprised, right?\n9 A. Because I——\n10 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor——\n11 A. ——a lot of people said something already about this\n12 contract.\n13 MR. SCHIRICK: Okay. I'll move on.\n14 Now again, I'm change——I'm going to change topics,\n15 your Honor. Is now a good time or should we continue?\n16 THE COURT: All right, yes. This is a fine time.\n17 It's 11:55.\n18 So you'll have your break. We'll return at 12:30.\n19 Remember not to discuss the case amongst yourselves or with\n20 anyone else. Don't permit anyone to discuss the case in your\n21 presence. And don't read, watch, or listen to anything from\n22 any source that has anything to do with the subject matter of\n23 this trial.\n24 You may step out. Don't discuss your testimony.\n25 (Jury not present; witness not present)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 THE COURT: You may be seated.\n2 Do the parties want to raise anything before we return\n3 at 12:30?\n4 MR. FERGENSON: Not from the government.\n5 MR. SCHIRICK: Not from the defense, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: All right.\n7 (Luncheon recess)\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 AFTERNOON SESSION\n2 12:30 p.m.\n3 THE COURT: Please get the jurors.\n4 (Jury present)\n5 THE COURT: Please be seated.\n6 And you may continue the cross-examination.\n7 Remember, ma'am, that you are still under oath.\n8 THE WITNESS: Yes.\n9 MR. SCHIRICK: Thank you, your Honor.\n10 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n11 Q. I'd like to just talk briefly about H Coin.\n12 So I believe you testified that you purchased H Coin\n13 in April of 2021, right?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And you purchased $4,500 worth of H Coin; is that right?\n16 A. You mean total?\n17 Q. Yeah.\n18 A. More than that.\n19 Q. Okay. How much, in total?\n20 A. Plus 5 percent commission, plus 35 other fees.\n21 Q. I'm sorry. Can you just speak up a little. Plus what?\n22 A. The H Coin fee, plus 5 percent commission, plus 35 other\n23 fees.\n24 Q. Right. And my question was just how much you spent on the\n25 H Coin. Was it more than 4500 or 4500?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 A. I have four——44,500, right? Then should be 4,450 for H\n2 Coin only.\n3 Q. Right. Okay. So you spent——am I correct in understanding\n4 you that you spent $4,500 on H Coin?\n5 A. Yeah, for H Coin only.\n6 Q. Yeah. Okay. That's all my question was.\n7 MR. SCHIRICK: All right. Now if we could please pull\n8 up Government Exhibit VN37.\n9 Q. And Ms. Wu, this is——I believe this is the exhibit that\n10 Mr. Fergenson showed you on direct.\n11 Okay. Now do you remember Mr. Fergenson asking you\n12 some questions about this document earlier?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Okay. And this reflects here on page 1 that you purchased\n15 44,500 coins, right?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 THE COURT: If you would bring the microphone close to\n18 your mouth.\n19 THE WITNESS: Okay.\n20 THE COURT: You can pull it, you can move it around.\n21 THE WITNESS: Yes.\n22 Q. Okay. And then Mr. Fergenson asked you some questions\n23 about your understanding of this document, right?\n24 A. Understanding this contract?\n25 Q. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Okay. And was it your understanding at the time that you\n3 signed this that the H Coin were being offered to you in part\n4 because of your volunteer work for the farms?\n5 A. They already added into this number for 44,500.\n6 Q. Right. And my question is a little different. My question\n7 is: Did you understand that the reason that you were being\n8 offered the opportunity to buy this number of H Coin was partly\n9 based on your volunteer work for the farm?\n10 A. No, I don't understand that. I never——I never heard of\n11 that.\n12 Q. You didn't understand that? Am I right that there was a\n13 formula that you testified to on direct that determined the\n14 number of coins that you would be allocated?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. And didn't that formula include in part how much volunteer\n17 work you had done for the farms, or for the Alliance?\n18 A. For the farms, that formula does not include this——this\n19 volunteer work, H Coin. I don't know how to call it.\n20 Q. Okay. What did it include, as far as you understand?\n21 A. That formula calculation number, at that time, and then\n22 when I needed to pay for this H Coin, the G series volunteer\n23 told me I should pay how much and told me something like how\n24 many H coins I should have.\n25 Q. Okay. And did you——in that conversation with the volunteer\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 did they ask you about your volunteer work?\n2 A. Ask my volunteer work? For what? I mean——\n3 Q. So you'll correct me if I get it wrong, but my\n4 understanding was that you had a conversation with a volunteer\n5 about the allocation of H coins. Do I have that right so far?\n6 A. Not discussion; just send me a message, just let me know.\n7 Q. Okay. So it was by Discord?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Okay. And I'm just going to refer to that as a discussion,\n10 if that's okay.\n11 A. Okay.\n12 Q. Okay. So in that Discord discussion, did the volunteer\n13 mention your volunteer work for the farm?\n14 A. No.\n15 Q. Okay. Now do you recall telling the government that it was\n16 your understanding that your volunteer work figured into the\n17 coin allocation formula?\n18 A. No.\n19 Q. You don't recall that?\n20 A. You mean I tell the government about I volunteer work for\n21 the H Coin?\n22 Q. Yeah. You don't recall telling the government that.\n23 A. I——I——don't remember.\n24 Q. Okay. Maybe it will help if I show you a document?\n25 MR. SCHIRICK: Could we please pull up 3620-17. And\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 if we could just highlight that relevant portion there, Jorge.\n2 THE WITNESS: Oh, I remember this.\n3 Q. Does that refresh your memory that your volunteer work was\n4 part of the formula for determining your H Coin allocation?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. Okay. Great. We can put that down.\n7 Okay. So being given this H Coin allocation was at\n8 the time, you understood, an opportunity or a reward for your\n9 volunteer work, right?\n10 A. I know this after that the G series volunteer gave me the\n11 number. At that time I felt very strange about this number,\n12 and later, somebody told me about this.\n13 Q. So it's your testimony you didn't understand at the time\n14 that you were being given this opportunity to buy H Coin\n15 because you did volunteer work, you only learned that after?\n16 Just looking to clarify.\n17 MR. FERGENSON: I think it misstates the testimony.\n18 But——\n19 THE COURT: You may answer.\n20 A. I think when I got the Discord message, I was kind of\n21 confused, and I just to confirm the number with that volunteer\n22 worker, they said everything was correct, and then I just paid\n23 the money, but later, I asked somebody else, they just said,\n24 that was your reward.\n25 Q. So they used the word \"reward,\" right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 A. Yeah. After the payment, I——I understood that.\n2 Q. Okay. But that's what you understood, that it was a\n3 benefit you were being given as a reward for part of your work,\n4 right?\n5 MR. FERGENSON: Just objection to form.\n6 THE COURT: You may answer.\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. Okay. Now at the time that you signed——I'm sorry.\n9 MR. SCHIRICK: Jorge, could we pull that back up, the\n10 37. Sorry.\n11 Q. At the time that you signed this document, did you read\n12 this, did you read this one?\n13 A. Already said at that time I already wanted a refund so I\n14 didn't pay attention, but I need to sign; I needed to sign this\n15 first.\n16 Q. Okay. So you didn't read this one either.\n17 A. Not really.\n18 Q. Okay. And your testimony is that at the time you signed\n19 this, you had already decided that you were going to leave the\n20 movement, right? You were uncomfortable.\n21 A. I have not——I had not decided at that time to leave this\n22 movement because I think even if I got all my money back, I\n23 could still in this group, right? So at that time I hadn't\n24 decided if leave or not. That's year 2021.\n25 Q. So you may have——if you got all of your money back, you may\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 have stayed in the movement; is that right?\n2 MR. FERGENSON: Calls for speculation.\n3 MR. SCHIRICK: I believe that's what she just said,\n4 your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: I think you may answer. Go ahead.\n6 A. I haven't——I hadn't have the final decision at that time.\n7 The final decision made just 2022.\n8 Q. Right. But that's what you were considering. You were\n9 considering staying in the movement even if you got your money\n10 back, right?\n11 A. Yeah. Some people, they didn't pay anything but still in\n12 the group.\n13 Q. Right. Okay. Now did you——did a time come when you did\n14 read this document, before you met with the prosecutors?\n15 A. You mean——can you just repeat.\n16 Q. Sure. Did a time come when you read this document, the one\n17 that's on your screen, before you met with the prosecutors?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. So you did read this one at some point.\n20 A. Yes, some point, not all.\n21 Q. And when was that?\n22 A. When I asked the refund.\n23 Q. Okay. So I believe you testified that you read your farm\n24 loan agreements when you——when it came time to ask for a\n25 refund, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 A. Not all, some, yes.\n2 Q. How many farm loan agreements are there?\n3 A. I mean, this contract, there are several pages, right?\n4 That's long. So——\n5 Q. Well, let's count them. How many pages are there? If we\n6 could just flip. Two. Three. Four. Five. Six.\n7 A. Yeah.\n8 Q. Five and a signature page.\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. Did I count that correctly?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Yes? Okay. Now you, as part of your work for the farm,\n13 you were a translator, right?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. You translated documents from Mandarin to English?\n16 A. English-Mandarin, Mandarin-English.\n17 Q. Yeah, sure. Both ways?\n18 A. Yeah.\n19 Q. Yeah. Makes sense. And for a five-page document, how long\n20 would it take you to translate that?\n21 A. This is a lot of terminology, financial or law, law\n22 terminology. I don't want to. At that time I already thought\n23 about leaving, so why I spend a lot of time on this?\n24 Q. So when you did translation work for Mountains of Spices as\n25 part of the Sara Wei lawsuit——do you remember we talked about\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 that earlier today?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. Okay. Now is it fair to say that there was plenty of law\n4 and legal terminology in those materials?\n5 A. Actually, the assistant did a lot of this part.\n6 Q. Okay.\n7 A. I just——just the plain translation and some calculation for\n8 the number.\n9 Q. Okay. So you had, it sounds like——is it fair to say you\n10 had limited translation skills?\n11 A. Not limited. I don't have that time. I didn't have that\n12 time, a lot of time. That assistant always stayed night to do\n13 this, and after that, after that——\n14 Q. I'm sorry. Go ahead.\n15 A. After that, she just felt so tired, and she just asked me\n16 to help her some, something, so——\n17 Q. Okay. And you were——I believe you testified you were not\n18 employed at this time, right? At the time that you signed this\n19 agreement, you'd been retired?\n20 A. Important, retire? You mean retire myself?\n21 Q. Yes.\n22 A. Yeah.\n23 Q. Okay. And so your testimony is that you were retired but\n24 you didn't have the time to read a five-page document?\n25 A. At that time I said my family issues.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Q. Okay. Now did anyone——withdrawn.\n2 No one put pressure on you to sign this document\n3 quickly, right?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. I believe you testified that you signed this document weeks\n6 if not months later, right?\n7 A. Months, because the months later, they gave us this, the\n8 contract.\n9 Q. But you had already sent the money, right?\n10 A. At that time, nothing; no contract, no agreement, nothing.\n11 Q. Right.\n12 A. Yeah.\n13 Q. So you had the opportunity to review the agreement; there\n14 was no rush to get the money in, right, because it was already\n15 in?\n16 A. Money already paid.\n17 Q. Right.\n18 A. Yeah.\n19 Q. So you had time to review the agreement, no?\n20 A. If I didn't sign, can I get my money back?\n21 Q. Ma'am, can you try answering my question?\n22 A. Okay, yeah. Review? Yes?\n23 Q. You had time, right?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Okay. That's all I'm asking.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Now as you testified before, you had——a time\n2 came——excuse me——when you asked for a refund, right, for the H\n3 Coin purchase?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Right. And you followed up a few times with a volunteer to\n6 get the refund, right?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And that was in January of 2023, approximately, right?\n9 A. January? You mean I got the refund?\n10 Q. No. That you followed up with a volunteer. The timing\n11 was, when you followed up with the volunteer, in approximately\n12 January of 2023.\n13 A. I still don't understand. January 2023.\n14 Q. Do you remember when you got the refund?\n15 A. I remember should be March.\n16 Q. That you received the refund, right, received the money\n17 back?\n18 A. Some.\n19 Q. Okay. And what you're referring to is you didn't receive\n20 back $200 or so in what you view as fees, right?\n21 A. 5 percent commission fee and——\n22 Q. Right. But you got everything else back besides the\n23 5 percent commission, right?\n24 A. Just for the H Coin only. You asked me to calculate at the\n25 beginning.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Q. Right. Okay.\n2 Now you mentioned that you invested through Wonder\n3 Invest, right? You testified about that?\n4 A. Not for H Coin.\n5 Q. Okay. But you did invest through it for farms and GTV?\n6 You made the farm loan through——\n7 A. VOG, right? You mean VOG? One transfer, yes, was Wonder\n8 Invest.\n9 Q. Okay. And the farm loans?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Okay. Now does Wonder Invest——withdrawn.\n12 Did you——did Wonder Invest invest in anything else\n13 apart from the——I think what you called the G series\n14 investments?\n15 A. You asked into my own company; is that okay?\n16 Q. Yeah. That's fine with me.\n17 A. Okay. Yes.\n18 Q. My question is: Did it invest in anything else?\n19 A. My own company?\n20 Q. Yes.\n21 A. Yeah.\n22 Q. Okay. What?\n23 A. Stock.\n24 Q. What kinds of stock?\n25 A. Just some kind of——\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Q. Like stock on the stock exchange?\n2 A. Yeah, yeah, just stock on the market.\n3 Q. What kind of investments, what kind of stock?\n4 A. What kind of stock? You mean the field, what field?\n5 Q. Yeah. Why don't we try this: How much are those other\n6 investments worth?\n7 A. All together?\n8 Q. Yeah.\n9 A. Including already sold?\n10 Q. Why don't——\n11 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor, just a relevance\n12 objection.\n13 THE COURT: Are you asking what her current portfolio\n14 is worth?\n15 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, she testified that she\n16 invested through this company, so I'm just trying to figure out\n17 what else the company invested in.\n18 MR. FERGENSON: Just a relevance objection.\n19 THE COURT: You may ask that question.\n20 A. I cannot remember. I——just——\n21 Q. Okay.\n22 A. You want a statement? I can't——\n23 Q. Ma'am, I'm just asking you for your memory of what else\n24 you've invested in.\n25 MR. FERGENSON: She said she can't remember.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 THE COURT: She doesn't remember. Let's go.\n2 Q. Now you testified that it was your company, but didn't you\n3 also testify on direct that your husband gave it to you just to\n4 play with?\n5 A. Yeah.\n6 Q. Okay. So how much, approximately, is in there for you to\n7 play with?\n8 A. The same questions you asked, just like how many stock,\n9 right?\n10 Q. No.\n11 MR. FERGENSON: Object on relevance, your Honor.\n12 THE COURT: Are you asking how much money her husband\n13 gave her to play with?\n14 MR. SCHIRICK: Well, what is the value of the assets\n15 and cash that are in this entity that she has to play with;\n16 that's my question.\n17 THE COURT: You may answer.\n18 A. Just the company, the account itself.\n19 Q. Okay. You can't give me a dollar figure, right?\n20 A. Give you a dollar?\n21 Q. Figure. A dollar amount. Do you understand me okay?\n22 A. I understand. It's just the company bank account. Just\n23 this account. Just like you open account, then you have that\n24 account.\n25 Q. Sure. But you won't tell me the dollar amount, but the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 account——\n2 MR. FERGENSON: Objection.\n3 THE COURT: So don't testify. Only ask questions.\n4 MR. SCHIRICK: Sure. Okay. All right. We'll move\n5 on.\n6 Q. Now you were asked some questions by Mr. Fergenson about if\n7 you knew you had H Coin on the Himalaya Exchange. Do you\n8 remember that?\n9 A. I——I cannot hear you, the whole sentence. Can you repeat\n10 again. Just, I——\n11 Q. Yes. So, no problem. So you testified earlier when you\n12 were on direct examination with Mr. Fergenson——\n13 A. Mm-hmm.\n14 Q. ——and he asked you if you knew if your H Coin was ever on\n15 the Himalaya Exchange. Do you remember that?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. Okay. And you said no, right?\n18 A. Yes. I don't have account.\n19 Q. Okay. And you checked, right?\n20 A. Checked what?\n21 Q. Ma'am, you checked whether your H Coin was on the Himalaya\n22 Exchange is the question I just asked.\n23 MR. FERGENSON: Asked and answered.\n24 MR. SCHIRICK: She did not answer.\n25 THE COURT: You may answer.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 A. You mean a check?\n2 THE COURT: No. He's asking whether you checked; did\n3 you inquire, did you check.\n4 THE WITNESS: I don't have account. Where I to check?\n5 Q. So the answer is you didn't check, right?\n6 A. I have no place to check. I don't know how to——to——which\n7 one to ask.\n8 Q. Did you call anybody?\n9 A. I asked the volunteer work there, they said they don't\n10 know.\n11 Q. Okay. Did you ever sell any of your H Coin?\n12 A. I don't have H Coin in my hand. How could I sell? I don't\n13 have in my hand. I cannot control it. How could I sell\n14 anything?\n15 Q. Well, that's the question. So the answer would be no.\n16 A. Okay.\n17 THE COURT: All right. So don't tell her what the\n18 answer should be. You ask questions, she gives answers; you\n19 don't testify, and she doesn't ask questions.\n20 MR. SCHIRICK: Sure.\n21 Q. Let's talk about your G/CLUBS membership.\n22 Now did you first learn about G/CLUBS from the G/CLUBS\n23 launch video?\n24 A. I know G Club from Miles Guo's video.\n25 Q. From his——now do you recall launching——excuse me.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Withdrawn.\n2 Do you recall watching the launch video for G/CLUBS?\n3 A. Miles Guo smoking, that one?\n4 Q. Do you know what I mean by launch video?\n5 A. Yeah.\n6 Q. Okay. What do you think I mean?\n7 A. I just remember he's just smoking in that video. That one?\n8 MR. SCHIRICK: Move to strike as nonresponsive.\n9 THE COURT: No. She's asking you are you referring to\n10 a video in which Mr. Guo is smoking.\n11 MR. SCHIRICK: Why don't we make this easy and pull up\n12 the video. GX C148-V1. And let's please go to time stamp\n13 3:28. And we'll just play it for a few seconds.\n14 MR. FERGENSON: I think, your Honor, Mr. Schirick may\n15 be pulling up GX C9. I may have misheard, but I think that's\n16 the exhibit.\n17 THE COURT: Well, you can confer with him.\n18 (Counsel conferring)\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, may we approach?\n20 THE COURT: Sure.\n21 (Continued on next page)\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 (At the sidebar)\n2 MR. SCHIRICK: So, your Honor, we just want to note\n3 for the record that the 3500 material shows that the witness\n4 met with the government on at least one occasion, perhaps more,\n5 with an interpreter, and that she continues to seem to have\n6 trouble in understanding questions, asking questions directly.\n7 So we'd like to ask for an interpreter.\n8 MR. FERGENSON: I've never used an interpreter with\n9 her. I had a standby interpreter on the calls, because we\n10 don't know, when we're first talking to someone, their facility\n11 with English.\n12 THE COURT: So was there ever an agent, whether you or\n13 someone else, who used an interpreter?\n14 MR. FERGENSON: Not that I'm aware of.\n15 THE COURT: She seems to me as being exceptionally\n16 smart and fluent in English. It may be a bit broken, but I\n17 have the sense that she understands every single word that\n18 you're saying. And she's great at the volleys.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: Well, I have to say I respectfully\n20 disagree. I think we've had to rephrase questions any number\n21 of times to try to get it across. Your Honor struck numerous\n22 answers from her testimony as being nonresponsive. It either\n23 shows that she's not willfully responding to the question or\n24 she doesn't understand.\n25 THE COURT: She's against your client and she wants to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 let the world know what she thinks. So yeah, she might be\n2 resisting you, but it's not about the language.\n3 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, I think, you know——\n4 MS. SHROFF: So I think at one point, your Honor, she\n5 was asked a question about when she had seen a document or\n6 something to that effect and her answer was indicative of she\n7 thought when the document was in fact created as opposed to\n8 when she saw it. We're just suggesting that because the direct\n9 flows more easily because she's prepped, so on the cross, it\n10 seems that she doesn't quite understand either the lingo or the\n11 question. And, look, she can volley all she wants. She's very\n12 funny. I'll give you that.\n13 THE COURT: She is as clever as she can be, and you\n14 can't be clever if you don't understand the question.\n15 MS. SHROFF: Well——\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: Or be clever by pretending not to\n17 understand the question.\n18 THE COURT: That's very possible, but I do not have\n19 the sense she has a language problem. I think she has a\n20 problem with your client and she's letting you know. And\n21 you've got to be deft and you've got to be agile. That's how\n22 it works.\n23 (Continued on next page)\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 (In open court)\n2 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n3 Q. Okay. So we're going to play you a video and you just let\n4 me know if you recognize it, okay?\n5 A. Okay.\n6 Q. And if you don't——Ms. Wu, if you don't understand a word\n7 that I'm using or a phrase that I'm using, just feel free to\n8 let me know and I'm happy to rephrase, okay?\n9 A. Okay.\n10 (Video played, for witness only)\n11 Q. Okay. Do you recognize that as the launch video for\n12 G/CLUBS?\n13 A. I don't remember.\n14 Q. Okay. Now at the time you were watching Mr. Guo's\n15 broadcasts fairly regularly, right?\n16 A. Too many. I cannot remember every one.\n17 Q. Yeah. I'm sure.\n18 So a time came when you purchased the G/CLUBS\n19 membership, right?\n20 A. Yeah.\n21 Q. Now did you purchase the G Club membership after watching\n22 this video?\n23 A. I don't remember.\n24 Q. Would you have made the purchase if you hadn't watched the\n25 video?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 MR. FERGENSON: Objection.\n2 THE COURT: Sustained. If she can't remember, then\n3 how she can answer this follow-up question?\n4 Q. How did you first learn about G/CLUBS?\n5 A. Miles Guo said that.\n6 Q. When?\n7 A. I don't remember.\n8 Q. Do you remember approximately when?\n9 A. On a yacht.\n10 Q. No, in time, ma'am.\n11 A. I don't remember.\n12 Q. Do you think you sent $10,000 to G/CLUBS?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Withdrawn. How did you learn where to send the $10,000 for\n15 G/CLUBS purchase?\n16 A. How do you learn?\n17 Q. Yeah. How did you know where to send the $10,000 for the\n18 G/CLUBS purchase?\n19 A. GClub.com?\n20 Q. So you went to the website?\n21 A. Yeah, the farm told us to do so.\n22 Q. Okay. And you registered on the website?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. Okay. And you received a membership number, right?\n25 A. You mean the online number, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 Q. A membership number, right.\n2 A. Okay, yes, online, yeah.\n3 Q. And do you recall whether you received that before or after\n4 you watched the G/CLUBS video?\n5 A. I don't remember.\n6 Q. Okay. Now you testified that G/CLUBS didn't give you any\n7 benefits, right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. You did have a potential discount on G Fashion, right?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. But you didn't like their stuff.\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. Now did you ever ask or inquire of G/CLUBS whether they\n14 were adding additional benefits?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Okay. Tell me about that.\n17 A. I wrote email to them.\n18 Q. Did you produce that email to the government?\n19 A. No. I deleted it, because one time my computer, some\n20 problem. I don't know what happened. Some——something just,\n21 gone.\n22 Q. Sure. It got deleted.\n23 A. Yeah.\n24 Q. Did you ever——besides the email that you just referenced,\n25 did you ever inquire in any other way about whether they were\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 adding additional benefits?\n2 A. I talked with members of the farm about this.\n3 Q. Okay. But my question was: Did you talk to anyone at\n4 G/CLUBS, or attempt to get in touch with anyone at G/CLUBS?\n5 A. No.\n6 Q. Okay. Now wasn't one of the benefits of G/CLUBS the G\n7 Talks sweepstakes?\n8 A. The benefits not that useful.\n9 Q. Didn't you enter the G Talks sweepstakes?\n10 A. Once.\n11 Q. Only once?\n12 A. Yeah.\n13 Because somebody told me something——\n14 Q. Sure. There's no question pending.\n15 A. Okay.\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: All right. Now if we could just please\n17 pull up GX C148-TX, which is also in evidence.\n18 And if we can go to page 5, please.\n19 Q. Can you see that displayed, that document displayed on the\n20 screen in front of you?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Okay. Now I'm going to read there. You let me know if I\n23 get it correct, okay? And this comes from the G/CLUBS launch\n24 video.\n25 Under the reviewed——\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 MR. FERGENSON: He's testifying. He just said this is\n2 the G/CLUBS launch video. She never said that.\n3 THE COURT: So the witness has not stated that she\n4 remembers the G Club launch video.\n5 MR. SCHIRICK: And I'm only showing this to her and\n6 reading it to her to see if it refreshes her recollection.\n7 THE COURT: So let's step up, please.\n8 (Continued on next page)\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 (At the sidebar)\n2 THE COURT: So she doesn't recall whether she saw the\n3 launch video. If you want to refresh her recollection, first\n4 you would say, is there something that might refresh your\n5 recollection, then you would show that to her, but you can't\n6 read from it; you'd ask her to read from it and ask, does this\n7 refresh your recollection.\n8 MR. SCHIRICK: This document is in evidence, your\n9 Honor.\n10 THE COURT: Absolutely, but when you're refreshing\n11 somebody's recollection, you can't read from the document. You\n12 have to first show the person the document and ask them, does\n13 it refresh your recollection.\n14 MR. FERGENSON: And I would just——my objection was\n15 just him stating this is from the launch video when she's never\n16 testified to that. She doesn't remember watching the video.\n17 MR. SCHIRICK: Mr. Fergenson is stating——\n18 THE COURT: The launch video is in evidence. And so\n19 you're trying to get at whether or not she saw it and whether\n20 she heard these warnings. That's what you're trying to get at,\n21 right?\n22 MR. SCHIRICK: Sure.\n23 THE COURT: So first you've got to establish that she\n24 has some recollection of seeing the video. She said she\n25 doesn't recollect. So maybe you can jog her memory. And the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 way that you jog the memory is by showing her something,\n2 whatever that thing might be, just showing it to her alone and\n3 asking her.\n4 MR. SCHIRICK: Happy to do that. Happy to do that.\n5 THE COURT: You could, for example, show her the video\n6 without the sound, and ask her does she recollect seeing that.\n7 MR. SCHIRICK: And that's what that video actually\n8 was, your Honor, was the beginning of it, beginning of the\n9 launch video.\n10 THE COURT: That was a document that we're reading\n11 from and what I'm suggesting is not right.\n12 MR. SCHIRICK: I was referring to the previous\n13 exhibit, your Honor, that had the Mandarin on the one side and\n14 the English on the other, and the audio recording. That's\n15 actually the launch video. But I'm happy to take the Court's\n16 point. I'm happy to refresh her recollection.\n17 THE COURT: Okay.\n18 (Continued on next page)\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 (In open court)\n2 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n3 Q. Now, Ms. Wu, you testified earlier, correct, that you don't\n4 recall whether you watched the G/CLUBS launch video?\n5 A. I don't remember. I don't remember.\n6 Q. Okay. Would it help if I showed you the document, help\n7 refresh your memory?\n8 A. No.\n9 Q. So nothing I can show you would help refresh your memory;\n10 you know that for sure without ever having seen it?\n11 MR. FERGENSON: Objection.\n12 THE COURT: Sustained.\n13 Is there something that might refresh your\n14 recollection? That's the question.\n15 THE WITNESS: For that video, no.\n16 THE COURT: Move on.\n17 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n18 Q. Do you have any problems with your memory, ma'am?\n19 A. I don't think so.\n20 Q. Okay. Now you were asked some questions by Mr. Fergenson\n21 about Miles Guo being targeted by the CCP. Do you remember\n22 that?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. Okay. And you said you don't think that the projects that\n25 Miles Guo worked on had anything to do with the CCP. Do you\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 remember that?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 MR. SCHIRICK: Okay. Can we pull up DX Stip 1.\n4 Q. Now I'm going to read you this document, and you let me\n5 know if it changes your mind——\n6 A. Okay.\n7 Q. ——about the question you just answered.\n8 \"It is hereby stipulated and agreed by the United\n9 States of America and Miles Guo, the defendant, through their\n10 attorneys of record that:\n11 \"1. The FBI has investigated individuals who, working\n12 at the direction of the government of the People's Republic of\n13 China ('the PRC government') have engaged in an international\n14 campaign, known as 'Operation Fox Hunt,' to coerce individuals\n15 located in the United States and elsewhere to return to China\n16 to face charges brought by the PRC government or to otherwise\n17 reach financial settlements with the PRC government.\n18 \"2. In 2017, a U.S. law enforcement agency assessed\n19 that Mr. Miles Guo was the highest priority of China's\n20 repatriation efforts.\n21 \"3. In 2017, a U.S. law enforcement agency received\n22 information that Chinese officials were paying and providing\n23 food and signs to protestors of Mr. Guo.\n24 \"4. In 2018, a U.S. law enforcement agency received\n25 information that the PRC government had established a special\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Cross\n1 investigative group in China to manage China's investigation\n2 of, and actions against, Mr. Guo.\"\n3 Now if we could scroll down to the next page.\n4 \"5. To carry out some of the objectives of Fox Hunt,\n5 in 2017, the PRC government tasked a specially-designated group\n6 of operatives ('the Group') with discrediting and harassing\n7 individuals including Mr. Guo by using interactive computer\n8 services and electronic communication systems.\"\n9 Now if we could just scroll down to paragraph 6,\n10 please.\n11 \"6. Since Mr. Guo fled the PRC, the PRC government\n12 has sought his return for prosecution in the PRC and has\n13 employed numerous methods to effect Mr. Guo's capture or\n14 arrest. In May 2017, the PRC government sent four undeclared\n15 agents from the PRC's Ministry of State Security ('MSS') to the\n16 United States to attempt to cause Mr. Guo's coerced\n17 repatriation to the PRC as part of the Fox Hunt initiative.\n18 The U.S. government disrupted the PRC government's efforts to\n19 forcefully repatriate Mr. Guo, and Mr. Guo continued to reside\n20 in the United States.\"\n21 Do you see that, ma'am?\n22 A. Yes. Yes.\n23 Q. Do you still believe that Mr. Guo's projects had nothing to\n24 do with being anti-CCP?\n25 A. Not exactly. I think this shows nothing to prove Miles Guo\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 anti the CCP. I don't think so.\n2 MR. SCHIRICK: No further questions at this time, your\n3 Honor.\n4 THE COURT: Redirect?\n5 MR. FERGENSON: Thank you, your Honor.\n6 Ms. Loftus, do you want to pull up DX Stip 1, if you\n7 have it.\n8 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n9 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n10 Q. While we're waiting, Ms. Wu, about the stipulation, the\n11 agreement between the parties you were just read, can you\n12 explain to the jury what you mean when you say that doesn't\n13 have anything to do with Miles Guo being anti-CCP?\n14 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection. She just explained it.\n15 THE COURT: I don't know if that was her exact answer.\n16 You could ask her to further explain the answer, but I don't\n17 know, the way you characterize it, if that's correct.\n18 MR. FERGENSON: Understood, your Honor.\n19 Q. Ms. Wu, could you explain your answer to the jury, please.\n20 A. Fox Hunt, this operation, chased many——chased after many\n21 people. Actually, not all people on this list are good people.\n22 I——as far as I know, Fox Hunt operation wanted a lot of people\n23 who colluded with CCP officer or officers to make huge fortune\n24 and then these people escaped abroad with the money, so this\n25 operation included some kind of these people, and as far as I\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 can searched online——\n2 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, objection.\n3 THE COURT: Overruled. You may continue.\n4 A. ——I just find that Miles Guo belongs to this category, so\n5 he committed economic crimes in China. I didn't find things\n6 about Miles Guo's political reason in China. So I——I think\n7 that's paragraphs prove nothing that Miles Guo anti-CCP.\n8 Q. And Ms. Wu, you testified that you first learned about\n9 Miles Guo in 2018, right?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. And had you heard of him before that?\n12 A. No.\n13 Q. Had you heard of him being a CCP dissident before that?\n14 A. No.\n15 Q. All right. Ms. Wu, you were asked some questions about\n16 Sara Wei.\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. Which farm did Sara Wei lead?\n19 A. At that time Phoenix Farm.\n20 Q. Who picked the farm leaders?\n21 A. Miles Guo.\n22 Q. Who gave the farm leaders instructions?\n23 A. Miles Guo.\n24 MR. FERGENSON: And Ms. Loftus, if we could pull up\n25 GX Z9. Could we go to page 192.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 Q. Ms. Wu, you were also asked questions about a falling-out\n2 between Miles Guo and Sara Wei. Do you remember that?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. All right. Now just focusing you on the bottom of page 192\n5 here, this date in this chart is February 13th, 2023, and the\n6 image there says Full Text of Miles Guo's Gettr Video.\n7 MR. FERGENSON: If we could scroll down slightly.\n8 And we'll go to the bottom of 193.\n9 Q. If we could, Ms. Wu, I'll just read the two paragraphs\n10 here.\n11 It says, \"Don't make excuses for yourself under any\n12 circumstances——\"\n13 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection.\n14 THE COURT: Is this document in evidence?\n15 MR. FERGENSON: It is, your Honor.\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: Is there a question?\n17 THE COURT: Perhaps you could ask the question first.\n18 MR. FERGENSON: Yes, your Honor. Is it okay if I ask\n19 Mr. Schirick if she can let me know if I read it correctly.\n20 THE COURT: No. You certainly could whisper in his\n21 ear the anticipated question.\n22 (Counsel conferring)\n23 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n24 Q. Ms. Wu, can you read the two paragraphs starting with,\n25 \"Don't make excuses.\"\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 A. \"Don't make excuses for yourself under any circumstances,\n2 whether it comes to earning money, striving for a goal, or\n3 pursuing what you believe in. Don't justify your failures and\n4 greed.\n5 \"In particular, Chinese people always like to pass the\n6 buck and blame someone in the family or their life for their\n7 own mistakes. They always make someone else the scapegoat and\n8 say it is this person's fault or that it was not because of him\n9 . . . our Chinese like to point fingers at others. Please,\n10 take responsibility for what you do.\"\n11 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, objection. There's no\n12 question.\n13 THE COURT: I'm waiting for the question.\n14 Q. Are you familiar with what a scapegoat is?\n15 A. This word, yes.\n16 Q. What is a scapegoat?\n17 A. Just put your fault on others and let others be responsible\n18 for your fault.\n19 MR. FERGENSON: Ms. Loftus, if we could go to page 6.\n20 Q. Ms. Wu, you were asked about this entry on the chart. Do\n21 you remember that?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 MR. FERGENSON: If we could scroll down.\n24 I'm sorry. Could we scroll up slightly, Ms. Loftus.\n25 Q. And Ms. Wu, in this video, just focusing you on the last\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 sentence of that first paragraph.\n2 A. Okay.\n3 Q. Could you read that sentence.\n4 A. This turned out to be a conservative estimate and 17.5\n5 times the valuation.\n6 Q. And what sorts of things did Miles Guo say about the value\n7 of GTV?\n8 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection. Asked and answered.\n9 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n10 A. He said, I remember 20 billion; maybe he said later was\n11 higher value.\n12 MR. FERGENSON: And Ms. Loftus, if we could go to\n13 page 28.\n14 Q. Ms. Wu, you were also asked about whether you sent your\n15 farm loan money before seeing a Miles Guo video about the\n16 farms. Do you remember being asked about that?\n17 A. I remember he asked about the G/CLUBS video.\n18 Q. Okay. We can do that too.\n19 MR. FERGENSON: If we can scroll down slightly. And\n20 we can keep scrolling down.\n21 Q. Now, Ms. Wu, do you see the date on the chart here is\n22 July 22, 2020?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. Is this before you sent your G/CLUBS money?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 Q. And do you see in the screenshot there, it says \"You become\n2 a shareholder of G Club immediately\"?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 MR. FERGENSON: If we could just pull up quickly\n5 GX V939.\n6 Government Exhibit VN39.\n7 Q. While we're waiting, Ms. Wu, you were asked questions about\n8 the H Coin quota formula. Do you remember being asked about\n9 that?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Can you explain how the volunteer work——well, withdrawn.\n12 Was the volunteer work the only thing that went into\n13 the formula, or just one thing?\n14 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection.\n15 THE COURT: Sustained.\n16 Q. Can you explain how the volunteer work factored into the\n17 formula generally.\n18 A. I don't know. They just——they did this. I don't think\n19 they had any rules for this. They just, like, if they like you\n20 and then give you more, if you——if they——just like according to\n21 their own feeling. I don't know. I don't know there are any\n22 rules for that.\n23 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection. Speculation, as to what\n24 other people thought or did.\n25 THE COURT: She said she doesn't know if there are any\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 rules. The answer stands.\n2 Q. And Ms. Wu, now that we have the loan agreement up, do you\n3 remember being asked questions about, you know, paragraph 1(d)\n4 here about the maturity date? Do you remember those questions?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 MR. FERGENSON: If we could scroll down to the\n7 signature page.\n8 Q. Ms. Wu, at the time you sent your money, did you even have\n9 a countersigned contract?\n10 A. No.\n11 Q. How long after you sent your money and you signed the\n12 contract did you get a signed copy back?\n13 A. Just this, 2021, November 2nd.\n14 Q. And did you get an addendum on that same date?\n15 A. I cannot remember. Maybe together. I don't remember.\n16 Q. Ms. Wu, you were also asked questions about your family in\n17 China. Do you remember being asked questions like that?\n18 A. Can you make it clearer.\n19 Q. On cross-examination you were asked questions about whether\n20 you had family in China. Do you remember that?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. And you were asked questions about whether you visited\n23 China. Do you remember that?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Are you testifying today because the CCP forced you to?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Recross\n1 A. No. You mean CCP force me to sit here to answer your\n2 question? No.\n3 Q. Are you a CCP spy?\n4 A. No.\n5 MR. FERGENSON: No further questions.\n6 THE COURT: Recross?\n7 RECROSS EXAMINATION\n8 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n9 Q. Ms. Wu, you were just shown a video from July 22nd of 2020,\n10 right?\n11 A. Yes, just now.\n12 Q. Okay. Sure. And Mr. Fergenson asked you whether you\n13 recalled if you had seen that before you purchased your G/CLUBS\n14 membership, right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Okay. And I showed you a video about the G/CLUBS launch,\n17 right?\n18 A. You showed me the video? No.\n19 Q. You don't recall me showing you a video?\n20 A. Just about the text, not a video.\n21 Q. It was a video that had text, right?\n22 A. Okay, yeah.\n23 Q. Okay. And so you remember that I showed that to you\n24 earlier.\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Recross\n1 Q. Okay. And you couldn't remember whether the video I showed\n2 you was before or after your G/CLUBS purchase, right? That was\n3 your testimony.\n4 A. You didn't say the date, right? I remember after that——\n5 Q. Would it help if I showed it to you to refresh your memory?\n6 A. Okay.\n7 MR. SCHIRICK: So if you pull up GX 148-TX, please.\n8 This is a document that's in evidence and it's dated\n9 October 13, 2020.\n10 And go to page 5, please.\n11 Q. And let me know if I get this right. Okay?\n12 \"Under the revised launch plan for G/CLUBS, however,\n13 members will not receive special access to future offerings of\n14 stock, will NOT receive GTV stock, and will NOT receive loans\n15 to purchase memberships. This is serious business, brothers\n16 and sisters. Even if you have bought G Club, it absolutely\n17 will not come with the stocks; it does not mean that you can\n18 buy stocks of G Fashion and GTV; and, it does not mean that you\n19 will be able to receive loans in the future. No! No! No!\n20 I'll repeat, this is a very serious topic. No! No! There is\n21 no GTV's stock. And there is no G Fashion's stock. When I\n22 hear all this, I got chills. There is none of that.\"\n23 Does that refresh your recollection?\n24 A. No. And I asked the date for this. The date.\n25 Q. As I said before, it's October 13th. It's three days\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Recross\n1 before you purchased your G/CLUBS membership, right?\n2 MR. FERGENSON: I mean, he can't do that, your Honor.\n3 THE COURT: She asked for the date.\n4 MR. SCHIRICK: It's a fact in evidence.\n5 THE COURT: October 13th what year?\n6 MR. SCHIRICK: 2020. It's a fact in evidence, by\n7 stipulation of the parties.\n8 THE COURT: Are you asking whether or not October 13th\n9 comes two days before October 15th? Is that the question?\n10 MR. SCHIRICK: Yes. And it's the 16th.\n11 THE COURT: Whether October——\n12 MR. SCHIRICK: 16th comes three days after\n13 October 13th, the date of this video.\n14 THE COURT: It's a compound question. So let's take\n15 it in pieces.\n16 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n17 Q. Okay. You purchased your G/CLUBS membership on\n18 October 16th, right, you testified before?\n19 A. I said October. I don't remember the date.\n20 Q. If I were to show you a document, would it refresh your\n21 recollection?\n22 A. If you have the document, yes. Yes.\n23 MR. SCHIRICK: Okay. Not for the jury yet, just for\n24 the witness and the parties.\n25 Q. Ma'am, do you recognize this document?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Recross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. And what is it?\n3 A. My wire transfer statement.\n4 Q. And in fact, this is a statement that you sent to the\n5 government lawyers, right?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 MR. SCHIRICK: Your Honor, we offer this into\n8 evidence.\n9 THE COURT: Any objection?\n10 MR. FERGENSON: No, your Honor.\n11 THE COURT: It is admitted. Do you have an identifier\n12 for this?\n13 MR. SCHIRICK: Yes. DX 7002, your Honor. I'm sorry.\n14 3.\n15 (Defendant's Exhibit 7003 received in evidence)\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: May we publish it to the jury, your\n17 Honor.\n18 THE COURT: Yes.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: Can we please zoom in on the date under\n20 the words Wire Transfer Information.\n21 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n22 Q. Can you see the document, Ms. Wu?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. And does this refresh your recollection that you purchased\n25 your G Club membership by sending $10,000 on October 16, 2020?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Recross\n1 A. I still cannot remember, but the paper like this, okay,\n2 that is the time.\n3 Q. Okay. But you don't have any reason to believe that this\n4 document, which you gave to the government, is incorrect, do\n5 you?\n6 A. This is right. This is right.\n7 Q. It's right.\n8 A. Yeah.\n9 MR. SCHIRICK: Okay. Now if we go back to the\n10 previous exhibit, GX C148-TX. Actually, I take that back. Can\n11 we go to GX Z9.\n12 And if we can please go to the October 13, 2020,\n13 entry.\n14 Q. Now do you see the document that's displayed on your\n15 screen?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. And you see that the date column is October 13, 2020?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: Okay. And now if we can scroll down.\n20 Keep going. Keep going, please.\n21 Keep going. We're looking for——here. There we go.\n22 Q. Now do you see here with the sentence beginning, \"Under the\n23 reviewed launch plan for G/CLUBS, however, members will not\n24 thereby have opportunity to subscribe for or purchase any\n25 shares to be issued in the future and will NOT receive GTV club\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Recross\n1 stock\"? Do you see that?\n2 MR. FERGENSON: Your Honor, this is the third time\n3 we're reading the same text in the examination. Just trying to\n4 speed things along.\n5 MR. SCHIRICK: Just trying to link it up.\n6 THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.\n7 Q. Do you see that?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And that was, as the chart tells you——the chart is in\n10 evidence——that that is from October 13th, right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. And that's three days before you purchased your G/CLUBS\n13 membership, right?\n14 A. I heard his previous or previous——or previous videos.\n15 Q. My question is, this is three days before you purchased\n16 your G Club membership, right?\n17 A. Yes, this is correct.\n18 Q. Okay. Thank you.\n19 Now you also——you testified a moment ago that you\n20 don't believe that Mr. Guo is truly anti-CCP, right?\n21 A. No, he's not.\n22 Q. Okay. Well, if we can pull up one more time DX Stip 1.\n23 Paragraph 5.\n24 And I'm going to start reading about halfway through\n25 this paragraph, a little bit more than halfway through,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Wu - Redirect\n1 beginning with the words \"In or about December 2018.\"\n2 \"In or about December 2018, officers of the Group were\n3 directed to post three videos or posts daily with YouTube and\n4 Facebook accounts, with one of the posts required to be\n5 anti-Mr. Guo. On February 3, 2020, a PRC government official\n6 issued a tasking requirement that every member of the Group\n7 shall write an original article with content related to\n8 targeting Mr. Guo, the COVID pandemic, or Hong Kong. The FBI\n9 investigated the Group's activities, including its activities\n10 aimed at Mr. Guo, and the U.S. government has charged many of\n11 the group's members with violations of U.S. law.\"\n12 Can you tell me why the PRC government would be\n13 targeting——\n14 MR. FERGENSON: Objection.\n15 Q. ——Mr. Guo in this way if he's not anti-CCP?\n16 THE COURT: Sustained. She cannot speak for the\n17 Chinese government.\n18 Q. Does this change your opinion as to whether Mr. Guo is\n19 anti-CCP?\n20 A. No.\n21 Q. Even if the CCP is after him, it doesn't change your\n22 opinion at all?\n23 THE COURT: Asked and answered.\n24 MR. SCHIRICK: No further questions, your Honor.\n25 THE COURT: Any redirect?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 MR. FERGENSON: Very briefly.\n2 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n3 BY MR. FERGENSON:\n4 Q. Ms. Wu, when you sent money to G/CLUBS, what did you expect\n5 to receive?\n6 A. GTV stock.\n7 MR. SCHIRICK: Beyond the scope.\n8 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n9 Q. Did you expect G/CLUBS money to be used to buy a mansion?\n10 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection. Beyond the scope.\n11 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n12 Q. Did you expect G/CLUBS money would be used to buy a\n13 mansion?\n14 MR. SCHIRICK: Same objection.\n15 A. No.\n16 MR. SCHIRICK: No further questions.\n17 THE COURT: Any re-recross?\n18 MR. SCHIRICK: No, your Honor.\n19 THE WITNESS: Good.\n20 THE COURT: You may step out.\n21 THE WITNESS: Thank you.\n22 (Witness excused)\n23 THE COURT: And the government may call its next\n24 witness.\n25 MR. FINKEL: The government calls Kimberly Espinoza.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 THE LAW CLERK: Would you raise your right hand,\n2 please.\n3 (Witness sworn)\n4 THE LAW CLERK: Thank you.\n5 THE COURT: Please state your name and spell it.\n6 THE WITNESS: Kimberly Espinoza. K-I-M-B-E-R-L-Y,\n7 E-S-P-I-N-O-Z-A.\n8 THE COURT: You may inquire.\n9 MR. FINKEL: Thank you, your Honor. Just one moment,\n10 please.\n11 KIMBERLY ESPINOZA,\n12 called as a witness by the Government,\n13 having been duly sworn, testified as follows:\n14 DIRECT EXAMINATION\n15 BY MR. FINKEL:\n16 Q. Ms. Espinoza, can you please remind the members of the jury\n17 where you work and what your title is.\n18 A. I work at the FBI and my title is a forensic accountant.\n19 THE COURT: One moment, please.\n20 You may continue.\n21 MR. FINKEL: Thank you, your Honor.\n22 Q. Ms. Espinoza, you've testified at this trial previously; is\n23 that correct?\n24 A. Yes, that's correct.\n25 Q. And after you testified last time you testified at this\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 trial, were you contacted by the case team again?\n2 A. Yes, I was.\n3 Q. And what, if anything, did the case ask you to do?\n4 A. To review new financial information, and testify again.\n5 Q. And did you review that new financial information?\n6 A. Yes, I did.\n7 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, at this time, pursuant to\n8 GX Stip 14, the government offers GX VNB1-3, GX IDB1, 3, 4, 7,\n9 GX SIG1, GX SIL4, GX SIL3, GX SIL40.\n10 THE COURT: The stipulation is already in evidence?\n11 MR. FINKEL: Yes, your Honor.\n12 THE COURT: Any objection?\n13 MR. SCHIRICK: No objection.\n14 THE COURT: They are admitted.\n15 (Government's Exhibits VNB1-3, IDB1, IDB3, IDB4, IDB7,\n16 SIG1, SIL4, SIL3, SIL40 received in evidence)\n17 MR. FINKEL: Pursuant to Stip 8, the government offers\n18 BR451 and BR452.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: No objection.\n20 THE COURT: They're admitted.\n21 (Government's Exhibit BR451 and BR452 received in\n22 evidence)\n23 MR. FINKEL: And the government also offers GX CAP623\n24 and GX CAP624.\n25 MR. SCHIRICK: No objection.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 THE COURT: They're admitted.\n2 (Government's Exhibits CAP623 and CAP624 received in\n3 evidence)\n4 MR. FINKEL: Thank you, your Honor.\n5 Ms. Loftus, if we could please display for the witness\n6 what's been marked for identification as GX Z12. And if you\n7 can just flip through that so Ms. Espinoza can take a look at\n8 it.\n9 We can go back to page 1.\n10 BY MR. FINKEL:\n11 Q. Ms. Espinoza, do you recognize this document?\n12 A. Yes, I do.\n13 Q. What is it?\n14 A. It's an analysis of financial statements that was——that I\n15 assisted with.\n16 Q. And did you review this analysis?\n17 A. Yes, I did.\n18 Q. Did you check it for accuracy based on the underlying\n19 exhibits?\n20 A. Yes, I did.\n21 Q. Is it accurate?\n22 A. Yes, it is.\n23 Q. And are those underlying exhibits voluminous records?\n24 A. Yes, they are.\n25 Q. And what kind of records are the underlying exhibits?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 A. Bank accounts, like bank statements, checks, deposits,\n2 withdrawals, and also some documentation relating to a\n3 property.\n4 MR. FINKEL: The government offers Z12.\n5 MR. SCHIRICK: No objection.\n6 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n7 (Government's Exhibit Z12 received in evidence)\n8 MR. FINKEL: If we could publish it, please.\n9 Q. Ms. Espinoza, at a high level, what was the money flow, if\n10 any, that you analyzed in this chart?\n11 A. It was money that was transferred from Crane Advisory Group\n12 LLC to Lawall & Mitchell, LLC, and then the ongoing of funds\n13 from there.\n14 THE COURT: I didn't catch where you said it was\n15 transferred.\n16 THE WITNESS: Lawall & Mitchell.\n17 Q. Do you know what Crane Advisory Group is?\n18 A. I do not.\n19 Q. Do you know who Haitham Khaled is?\n20 A. I do not.\n21 Q. Okay. This is the first——we're looking at the first slide\n22 of Z12, Ms. Espinoza. And at the top left, it says Capital One\n23 887 and 890. What do those numbers refer to?\n24 A. Those are the last four digits of two bank accounts.\n25 Q. Bank accounts in the name of what entity?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 A. Crane Advisory Group, LLC.\n2 MR. FINKEL: If we could go to the next slide, please.\n3 Q. And what are we looking at here on slide 2?\n4 A. These are the signature cards for those two Crane Advisory\n5 Group LLC bank accounts.\n6 Q. What's the signature card?\n7 A. It's a card provided by the bank listing all the account\n8 information and then who's the authorized user or signer of the\n9 account.\n10 Q. What's the business name at the top of each of these\n11 accounts, the 887 and 890 accounts?\n12 A. It's Crane Advisory Group, LLC.\n13 Q. And what is the signature at the bottom of these signature\n14 cards?\n15 A. Haitham Khaled.\n16 MR. FINKEL: We can go to the next slide, please,\n17 Ms. Loftus.\n18 Q. And what does this slide represent, Ms. Espinoza?\n19 A. There were additional Crane Advisory Group LLC bank\n20 accounts that were not at Capital One, so these are——there were\n21 seven accounts at three other banks.\n22 Q. And they were all in the name of Crane Advisory Group?\n23 A. Yes, they were.\n24 MR. FINKEL: Could we go to the next slide, please.\n25 Q. And what are we looking at here?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 A. These are three signature cards for those bank accounts I\n2 just referred to, so they're for IDB Bank and for Signature\n3 Bank.\n4 Q. And these accounts are in the name of what entities?\n5 A. Crane Advisory Group, LLC.\n6 Q. And what is the contact information on these three\n7 documents on the screen, or the name of the individual?\n8 A. The name of the signer?\n9 Q. Yes, please. Thank you.\n10 A. Is Haitham Khaled.\n11 MR. FINKEL: Okay. We can go to the next slide,\n12 please, Ms. Loftus.\n13 Q. What is Lawall & Mitchell?\n14 A. I'm not sure.\n15 Q. Did you look at bank account information for Lawall &\n16 Mitchell?\n17 A. Yes, I did.\n18 Q. And is that at Valley National Bank?\n19 A. Yes, it is.\n20 MR. FINKEL: Could we go to the next slide, please,\n21 Ms. Loftus.\n22 Q. And can you explain to the members of the jury,\n23 Ms. Espinoza, what this slide represents, slide 6.\n24 A. At the bottom is just like an example of one of the\n25 statements, so it just shows it said Valley National Bank, it\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 says Lawall & Mitchell, LLC, the address is also listed there,\n2 and the——the last four digits of the account, which is 1500.\n3 Q. Okay. Do you know who Aaron Mitchell is?\n4 A. I do not.\n5 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Loftus, if you could bring up GX 128,\n6 please, which is in evidence.\n7 Q. Do you know who this individual is?\n8 A. I do not.\n9 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Loftus, if we could go back to Z12 at\n10 page 6, please.\n11 Q. And on the left side of——excuse me. On the left of this\n12 slide, Ms. Espinoza, it says balance as of September 26th.\n13 What is the balance as of September 26, 2021?\n14 A. $73,672.\n15 MR. FINKEL: And if we could go to the next slide,\n16 please, Ms. Loftus.\n17 Q. And so are these the three——excuse me——the groups of\n18 accounts that you were analyzing, at least initially?\n19 A. Yes, that's correct.\n20 MR. FINKEL: Let's go to the next slide, please,\n21 Ms. Loftus.\n22 Q. So we're on slide 8 now, Ms. Espinoza, and what does slide\n23 8 depict? Can you describe it please to the members of the\n24 jury.\n25 A. So the two Crane Advisory Group, LLC Capital One accounts\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 ending in 0887 and 0890 transferred a total of $37,006,848 on\n2 September 29, 2021, to Lawall & Mitchell LLC's bank account at\n3 Valley National Bank.\n4 Q. Do you know why those two Crane accounts transferred\n5 $37 million and change on September 29, 2021?\n6 A. I do not.\n7 MR. FINKEL: If we can go to the next page, please,\n8 Ms. Loftus.\n9 Q. What does this page represent, slide 9?\n10 A. The total there at the bottom is the 37,006,848 that I just\n11 said from the previous slide, so this is three separate\n12 transfers which add up to that total.\n13 Q. And why is there an asterisk on the first transfer, the\n14 date of the first transfer?\n15 A. Because the wire went through on September 29, 2021, but on\n16 the Capital One statement, the date of the transaction was\n17 listed as September 10, 2021.\n18 Q. Do you know the reason for that delay?\n19 A. I do not.\n20 MR. FINKEL: If we can go to slide 10, please,\n21 Ms. Loftus.\n22 Q. Ms. Espinoza, can you describe what slide 10 represents.\n23 A. So for the other seven bank accounts at the other three\n24 banks of Crane——for Crane Advisory Group, LLC bank accounts,\n25 $9,542,511 was transferred to Lawall & Mitchell at Valley\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 National Bank between September 27, 2021, and October 27, 2021.\n2 Q. And prior to these transfers can you remind the jury\n3 approximately how much money was in the Lawall & Mitchell\n4 account.\n5 A. It was about 73,000.\n6 MR. FINKEL: If we can go to slide 11, please,\n7 Ms. Loftus.\n8 Q. And what does this slide represent?\n9 A. The total at the bottom is the 9,542,511 from the prior\n10 slide, so this is just showing each individual transfer which\n11 makes up that amount.\n12 Q. And so there were some transfers of less than $10; is that\n13 correct?\n14 A. Yes, that's correct.\n15 Q. That's what the records show?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 MR. FINKEL: If we could go to slide 12, please.\n18 Q. And so Ms. Espinoza, turning to slide 12, what was the\n19 total amount transferred by these nine Crane Advisory Group\n20 bank accounts into Lawall & Mitchell?\n21 A. $46,549,359.\n22 Q. Did you follow the money flow from the Lawall & Mitchell\n23 account further?\n24 A. Yes, I did.\n25 MR. FINKEL: Go to slide 13, please, Ms. Loftus.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 Q. And can you tell the jury what we're looking at in slide\n2 13.\n3 A. On November 8, 2021, Lawall & Mitchell, that same account\n4 that we've been discussing at Valley National Bank, transferred\n5 $46,549,275 to an account at Silvergate Bank called Hamilton\n6 Opportunity Fund SPC.\n7 Q. What is Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC?\n8 A. I do not know.\n9 MR. FINKEL: If we can go to slide 14, please.\n10 Q. And by the way, Ms. Espinoza, aside from your testimony\n11 today on this chart and your testimony I guess a week or so ago\n12 on that chart, did you have any other involvement in this case?\n13 A. I did not.\n14 Q. Ms. Espinoza, can you explain to the members of the jury\n15 what we're looking at on slide 14.\n16 A. This is a signature card for the Silvergate Bank account.\n17 They referred to it as a master agreement. So it says the two\n18 people who are authorized to use the account are Kin Ming Je\n19 and David Fallon.\n20 Q. And Kin Ming Je is on the left side?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Do you know who that individual is?\n23 A. I do not.\n24 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Loftus, can we please pull up\n25 Government Exhibit 103.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 MR. SCHIRICK: Objection. Is there a question?\n2 MR. FINKEL: I'm just waiting for the document to\n3 load.\n4 Q. My question is, Ms. Espinoza: Do you know who this\n5 individual is depicted in Government Exhibit 103?\n6 A. I do not.\n7 Q. Do you know if this is Kin Ming Je?\n8 A. I do not.\n9 MR. FINKEL: Can we go back please to Government\n10 Exhibit Z12 at slide 14.\n11 Q. And what was the balance prior to these transfers,\n12 approximately?\n13 A. 29 million.\n14 MR. FINKEL: Go to slide 15, please, Ms. Loftus.\n15 Q. What happened to the 46½ million and change that was\n16 transferred from Lawall & Mitchell into the Hamilton\n17 Opportunity Fund, 7739 account? What happened to it after\n18 that?\n19 A. On December 2, 2021, the same amount, so 46,549,275, was\n20 transferred to another Hamilton Opportunity Fund account at\n21 Silvergate Bank. The account's last four digits are 7713.\n22 Q. And was there any information in these wire transfers\n23 that's not reflected on the chart about the reason for these\n24 transfers?\n25 A. On the bank statement, there was——it did say investor\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6D1GUO3 Espinoza - Direct\n1 incorrect account, or something to that effect.\n2 Q. And do you know who put that information into the wire\n3 transfer?\n4 A. I do not.\n5 (Continued on next page)\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Direct\n1 BY MR. FINKEL:\n2 Q. Do you know why that information was included?\n3 A. It could have been the bank. It could have been the\n4 sender, but I don't know why.\n5 Q. Can we go to slide 16, please, Ms. Loftus, the next slide.\n6 Ms. Espinoza, what are we looking at here?\n7 A. This is a mass agreement or signature card for Silvergate\n8 Bank at 7713, and it's the same authorized users which are Kin\n9 Ming Je and David Fallon.\n10 Q. Kin Ming Je and David Fallon are the authorized users for\n11 both of these Hamilton Opportunity Fund accounts; is that\n12 correct?\n13 A. Yes, that's correct.\n14 Q. What was the balance in this Hamilton Opportunity Fund 7713\n15 account prior to the $46.5 million transfer?\n16 A. $4,779,188.\n17 Q. Ms. Espinoza, did you also track the money flow after this\n18 46.5 million went from Crane Advisory Group to Lawall &\n19 Mitchell to Hamilton Opportunity Fund to a second Hamilton\n20 Opportunity Fund, did you find out what happened to it after\n21 that?\n22 A. Yes, I did.\n23 Q. Go to the next slide, please, Ms. Loftus.\n24 What happened on December 8, 2021?\n25 A. $2 million payment was made to McDonnell Whitaker attorney\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Direct\n1 trust.\n2 Q. If we can go to the next slide, please.\n3 Ms. Espinoza, what happened on December 16, 2021?\n4 A. $24,500,000, a payment was made to Insight Title Services,\n5 LLC trust.\n6 Q. And that payment was made from which account?\n7 A. The Hamilton Opportunity Fund 7713 account.\n8 Q. If we can go to the next slide, please.\n9 What does this slide depict?\n10 A. An additional 13 million was sent to Buck Esquire, LLC\n11 attorney trust account between December 1, 2021 and March 2,\n12 2022.\n13 Q. So in total approximately how much money was transferred\n14 from, bringing the money flow all the way down, but ultimately\n15 from this Hamilton Opportunity Fund 7713 between December 8 and\n16 March 2, 2022?\n17 A. $39,500,000.\n18 Q. Ms. Espinoza, did you also review documents from Insight\n19 Title Services, LLC trust?\n20 A. Yes, I did.\n21 Q. Documents pertaining to this $24.5 million?\n22 A. Well, documents related to a property which is\n23 approximately that amount, yes.\n24 Q. Can we go to the next slide, please. Is this one of the\n25 documents that you reviewed?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Direct\n1 A. Yes, it is.\n2 Q. It says at the top settlement statement HUD-1; is that\n3 correct?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Do you know what an HUD-1 statement is?\n6 A. In looking at the statement, it just for like a property\n7 purchase, so it list the borrower, the seller, the purchase\n8 price, and borrower and seller transactions.\n9 Q. And if we can zoom in on the G box on the left side at the\n10 top. Are you able to read that, Ms. Espinoza?\n11 A. Yes. Property Location, 675 Ramapo Valley Road, Mahwah,\n12 New Jersey 07430. Would you like the rest?\n13 Q. No. That's okay. Can you zoom out of that, please.\n14 Can you zoom into the box above it where it says name\n15 and address of borrower.\n16 According to this document, Ms. Espinoza, what is the\n17 name of the borrower?\n18 A. Taurus Fund, LLC.\n19 Q. Do you know what that is?\n20 A. I do not.\n21 Q. Ms. Loftus, can you zoom in on row 101 where it says\n22 contract sales price.\n23 What is the contract sales price of this home?\n24 A. $26 million.\n25 Q. And if we can zoom in, please, on row 201.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Direct\n1 What is it say for the deposit or earnest money?\n2 A. $2 million.\n3 Q. Ms. Loftus, you can go back to slide 19.\n4 How much was the transfer on December 8, 2021, to\n5 McDonnell Whitaker attorney trust?\n6 A. $2 million dollars.\n7 Q. Go back to slide 20, the next slide, please, Ms. Loftus.\n8 If we can go to the next slide.\n9 Are these additional documents from Insight Title\n10 Services?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. If you can zoom in, Ms. Loftus, on the first row on the\n13 left. Go all the way over to the right.\n14 Can you read across this row, please, the first row,\n15 Ms. Espinoza?\n16 A. On December 17, 2021, Taurus Fund LLC, HUD line 303, cash\n17 from borrower, and it's a deposit amount of $24,344,844.44.\n18 Q. Zoom out of that. The bottom of the document it says\n19 $155,155.56. Can you explain the document on the right?\n20 A. The document on the right is a wire transfer for that same\n21 amount. It's made from Insight Title to Buck Esquire, LLC, and\n22 there's a note at the bottom which says overfund.\n23 Q. Ms. Loftus, if you can zoom in on the last row of the last\n24 document, the second to last row.\n25 Can you read the last, next to December 17, 2021,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Cross\n1 beginning with Crocker?\n2 A. Crocker Mansion Estate, LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability\n3 Company, HUD line 603, cash to seller, $10,852,425.02.\n4 Q. Have you ever been to 675 Ramapo, Valley Road?\n5 A. I have not.\n6 Q. You ever been to the Crocker mansion?\n7 A. No.\n8 MR. FINKEL: Thank you, Ms. Espinoza. Nothing\n9 further.\n10 THE COURT: Cross examination.\n11 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n12 BY MR. SCHIRICK:\n13 Q. Thank you, your Honor. Just briefly. Good to see you\n14 again, Ms. Espinoza. As we covered last time, you testified\n15 the government's lawyers asked you for the first time to\n16 testify in this case about three weeks ago, right, maybe a\n17 little more?\n18 A. Maybe three to four weeks ago.\n19 Q. And again, you didn't know anything about this case before\n20 the prosecutor asked you to testify?\n21 A. I did not.\n22 Q. And again as we covered, you weren't part of the FBI's\n23 investigative team on this matter?\n24 A. Correct.\n25 Q. And you're not part of the prosecution team?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Cross\n1 A. Correct.\n2 Q. And, in fact, as you testified on direct, you haven't\n3 really had any involvement in this case aside from your\n4 testimony and then your prep for that testimony, right?\n5 A. Yes, that's correct.\n6 Q. Now, just turning to the chart briefly, can you just tell\n7 me who created the first draft of the chart?\n8 A. I believe it was a forensic accountant, not myself, another\n9 forensic accountant at the FBI.\n10 Q. And approximately when was that?\n11 A. It was maybe two weeks ago.\n12 Q. And after that first draft, you and the government lawyers\n13 talked about the chart?\n14 A. I think I may have received it at like maybe version three\n15 or four, so I wasn't involved in the initial conversations.\n16 Q. In the earlier version. And after you received it in\n17 version three or four, how many additional versions were there\n18 after that?\n19 A. I believe this is version five, five or six, but I believe\n20 it's five.\n21 Q. Fair enough. Let's just take a quick look at the chart.\n22 If we could pull it up, please, Government Exhibit C-12. I'm\n23 just going to ask you a couple of questions. We can flip\n24 through this quickly. If we could please go to page four, the\n25 title of this slide is Crane Advisory -- I'm sorry. Withdrawn.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Cross\n1 Off to the right-hand side of this page in a box\n2 that's outlined in green it says Crane Advisory seven accounts\n3 at three banks, right?\n4 A. Correct.\n5 Q. And this slide displays two signature cards at IDB Bank,\n6 right?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And then one signature card from Signature Bank?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. Was there a third bank involved here?\n11 A. Yes, there was.\n12 Q. And was that bank Morgan Stanley?\n13 A. Yes, it was.\n14 Q. And how many accounts did Crane have at Morgan Stanley if\n15 you recall?\n16 A. Four accounts.\n17 Q. And there aren't any signature cards from those accounts at\n18 Morgan Stanley displayed here, right?\n19 A. Correct.\n20 Q. If we could please go to page eight.\n21 Now I believe you were asked this on direct, but you\n22 don't know what Lawall & Mitchell is, right?\n23 A. I do not.\n24 Q. Do you know why it's receiving funds?\n25 A. I do not.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Cross\n1 Q. So you don't know, for example, if Lawall & Mitchell is one\n2 of G/Club's attorneys, right?\n3 A. I do not know.\n4 Q. If we could go to slide 13, please.\n5 Now, this slide shows Lawall & Mitchell sending money\n6 to Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC, right?\n7 A. Yes, it does.\n8 Q. And you testified that you don't know what kind of fund\n9 Hamilton is, right?\n10 A. I do not know what type of fund it is, no.\n11 Q. You don't know in whose name these funds are listed at\n12 Hamilton, right?\n13 A. I believe we have signature cards on the next slide for\n14 them and the names that are listed.\n15 Q. So let me just rephrase that because the question may have\n16 been unclear. Within Hamilton, the entity, you don't know what\n17 account within Hamilton the funds are held, right, as opposed\n18 to the bank?\n19 A. Yeah, I only know the bank account information.\n20 Q. Right. Yes. Thank you. That was the distinction I was\n21 trying to draw. Thank you. And if we could go to page 15,\n22 please.\n23 This slide shows an internal transfer within signature\n24 bank, right, between one account for Hamilton to another\n25 account for Hamilton?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Cross\n1 A. Yes, it's a transfer between the two accounts.\n2 Q. Right. So this isn't actually money leaving Silvergate\n3 Bank, right, in the last arrow between the two bottom boxes?\n4 A. The last transfer is between Silvergate Bank to a\n5 Silvergate Bank account.\n6 Q. It's fair to call that an internal transfer, to not leaving\n7 the bank?\n8 A. Yes, that's fair.\n9 Q. And this happens on December 2, 2021, right?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. And you don't know why, right?\n12 A. Correct.\n13 Q. And you don't know, for example, the funds were initially\n14 directed to the wrong account?\n15 A. I'm sorry. Could you repeat that.\n16 Q. You don't know if, for example, the funds were initially\n17 directed to the wrong account?\n18 A. I do not know that.\n19 Q. If we could please turn to slide 20. And you testified on\n20 direct a moment ago that this is a HUD-1 form, right?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Is this form a standard government form in the purchase and\n23 sale of real estate to your knowledge?\n24 A. I'm not sure whether it's a standard form or not.\n25 Q. Let's zoom in on the upper left. I believe it's D. This\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Espinoza - Cross\n1 is a little bit of an eye test here, but I think it's the first\n2 box on the upper left. And it says Taurus Fund LLC. You see\n3 that?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. And do you have experience with real estate transactions as\n6 part of your work as a forensic accountant for the FBI?\n7 A. I do.\n8 Q. And it's common, isn't it, in the purchase of higher-end\n9 real estate for the buyer to create an LLC to hold title?\n10 A. I don't know if it's common or not.\n11 Q. If we could zoom in on what is to the right of that E, and\n12 it's a little blurry, can you see there that the name of the\n13 seller appears to be Crocker Mansion Estate, LLC, a New Jersey\n14 Limited Liability company?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. And does that sort of indicate to you that the seller here\n17 too was an LLC?\n18 A. Yes, the seller here is an LLC.\n19 MR. SCHIRICK: No further questions at this time, your\n20 Honor.\n21 THE COURT: Redirect.\n22 MR. FINKEL: Nothing, your Honor. Thank you,\n23 Ms. Espinoza.\n24 THE COURT: You may step.\n25 (Witness excused)\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 THE COURT: The government may call its next witness.\n2 MS. MURRAY: Thank you, your Honor. The government\n3 calls Jamie Wilson.\n4 JAMIE WILSON,\n5 called as a witness by the Government,\n6 having been duly sworn, testified as follows:\n7 THE COURT: Please state your name and spell it.\n8 THE WITNESS: Jamie Wilson, J-A-M-I-E, Wilson is\n9 W-I-L-S-O-N.\n10 THE COURT: You may inquire.\n11 MS. MURRAY: Thank you, your Honor.\n12 DIRECT EXAMINATION\n13 BY MS. MURRAY:\n14 Q. Good afternoon, Ms. Wilson.\n15 A. Good afternoon.\n16 Q. Where are you employed?\n17 A. I'm employed at the Bank of Princeton.\n18 Q. What is your title?\n19 A. I am the BSA officer for the bank.\n20 Q. And what does BSA stand for?\n21 A. BSA stands for the Bank Secrecy Act.\n22 Q. When did you become a BSA officer?\n23 A. Four years ago.\n24 Q. What are your duties and responsibilities as a BSA officer?\n25 A. My duties are to protect the financial institution and our\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 financial industry from money laundering, terrorist financing,\n2 tax evasion.\n3 Q. Can you describe for the jury how, if at all, you monitor\n4 for your issues in the course of your BSA duties?\n5 A. Yes. We have different ways of monitoring. We have a\n6 system that alerts us when people's activity goes outside of\n7 what you would consider normal for a personal account or a\n8 business account. We have ways of contacting -- law\n9 enforcement can contact us through 314As. We have 314Bs which\n10 allows us to talk to other financial Constitutions. We have\n11 different monthly and weekly reports where we monitor wires,\n12 monetary instruments, any activity that comes in and out of a\n13 bank we monitor it.\n14 Q. And you mentioned the 314B program, can you explain in a\n15 bit more detail what that entails?\n16 A. So 314B program is -- not all financial institutions are\n17 involved in it, but if you sign up, it allows you to talk to\n18 another bank about customers that you both have the same\n19 customer.\n20 So if I was a customer of financial institution A, and\n21 financial institution B also, I was a customer of that\n22 institution, we could talk about the activity going through our\n23 accounts in reference to money laundering and possible\n24 terrorist financing.\n25 Q. And how, if at all, does the 314B information sharing\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 system assist you in doing your BSA monitoring?\n2 A. That helps us put the bigger picture together. So if we're\n3 unsure where activity is coming from or the original source or\n4 it or where it is going to, it allows us the capability of\n5 finding out where that money originated from, if it was coming\n6 into ours or where it was going, and what it was used for if it\n7 goes somewhere else.\n8 Q. Ms. Wilson, are you familiar with the term QualiFile?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. What is QualiFile?\n11 A. QualiFile is a report run on every individual in business\n12 that comes to a bank to open an account. And it's a checks\n13 systems report that every single bank runs, and it allows you\n14 to see if somebody has a charge off at another institution. So\n15 if they went in the negative at another bank, it would show us\n16 that they possibly owe that financial institution funds.\n17 Q. Are you familiar with the phrase OFAC?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. What does that stand for?\n20 A. OFAC is the Office of Foreign Asset Control, and OFAC sends\n21 out multiple different types of lists that some people may be\n22 blocked or sanctioned, and you cannot transact with those\n23 individuals or businesses.\n24 Q. How, if at all, are the OFAC list relevant to your duties\n25 and responsibilities as a BSA officer?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 A. If somebody hits the OFAC list, then we need to call OFAC\n2 which is part of the U.S. treasury, and either deny a\n3 transaction or potentially put it into a separate account and\n4 hold those funds.\n5 Q. Can you describe the average bank of Princeton customer\n6 profile?\n7 A. Yeah. The average bank of Princeton can be anybody from\n8 what I would consider a blue collar customer, so somebody\n9 possibly a mechanic or a military person to real estate agents\n10 or doctors offices.\n11 Q. And how many branches are there of Bank of Princeton?\n12 A. We have 26 branches.\n13 Q. Geographically speaking, where in the U.S. are those\n14 branches located?\n15 A. They're located mostly in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and\n16 just recently a couple in the outskirts of the New York, not\n17 within a city, but mostly New Jersey and Pennsylvania.\n18 Q. Ms. Wilson, did there come a time when you conducted a BSA\n19 review of an account held in the name of Lamp Capital?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Approximately when was that?\n22 A. Around September of 2020.\n23 Q. What, if anything, do you recall about that customer?\n24 A. That customer came to us from a board member who met with a\n25 advisor and a financial advisor and a lawyer, and they were\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 introduced together to bring money to our financial institution\n2 because they considered us more of a family bank still over the\n3 larger institutions.\n4 Q. Do you recall the name of that advisor who referred the\n5 account?\n6 A. I believe the advisor -- Stephen Lawandy was the lawyer,\n7 and then Haitham Khaled was the advisor who brought the funds\n8 to us.\n9 Q. Who, if anyone, did the advisor say that he was working\n10 with in bringing the account to Bank of Princeton?\n11 MR. BARKAN: Objection, Hearsay.\n12 THE COURT: Sustained.\n13 Q. Do you recall whether there were any other individuals\n14 referenced in Lamp Capital?\n15 A. When Lamp Capital was open, the signer on the account was\n16 another lawyer. Once we researched that name, Daniel\n17 Podhaskie.\n18 Q. Ms. Wilson, when an account is open at Bank of Princeton,\n19 what information, if any, does the bank request of the\n20 potential customer?\n21 A. We request, when it's a business account, we need two forms\n22 of business identification. Usually it's an SS4 which is given\n23 from the IRS that has their EIN number. And a EIN number is\n24 kind of like a person's social security number for a business.\n25 And then the other document would be their certificate of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 formation that's usually filed with the state, and all the IDs\n2 for the signers on the account.\n3 Q. And what, if anything, do you do with that information once\n4 you collect it?\n5 A. We review it to make sure that it is a legitimate document\n6 so that they actually did file with the IRS. They did file\n7 with the different states. We review that the signers match\n8 the business documents that are being opened, and that even the\n9 signers IDs are legitimate.\n10 Q. Did you conduct a BSA review of the Lamp Capital account?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. What, if anything, do you recall about that review?\n13 A. The beneficial owners, which we also do, is the ultimate\n14 owner of the business. We reviewed those documents. The\n15 opening documents, which the signer on the account wasn't the\n16 owner of the business, so that was a bit of a red flag to us.\n17 And they happen to be a lawyer, not the actual signers. And\n18 the signers and owners of the business on the UBO form, which\n19 is the Ultimate Beneficial Ownership form, they were an NRA,\n20 which is a non-resident alien, so not a U.S. citizen. Which\n21 doesn't make it bad, it just makes it a little higher risk for\n22 us as the bank.\n23 Q. I want to discus some of the characteristics of the Lamp\n24 Capital account based on your review. Do you recall the\n25 approximate dollar amount of that account?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 A. Yes. When they opened it, they brought in around 10\n2 million.\n3 Q. How, if at all, did that compare to the dollar amount in\n4 other Bank of Princeton customer accounts that you reviewed?\n5 MR. BARKAN: Objection, relevance.\n6 MS. MURRAY: It goes to the risk rating that\n7 Ms. Wilson was just speaking about.\n8 THE COURT: I'll allow the answer.\n9 A. Without having a loan at the institution, I've never seen\n10 that kind of money brought in to open an account before. It\n11 was higher than our average clientele.\n12 MS. MURRAY: Your Honor, there's a stipulation between\n13 the parties that I believe is in evidence. I'm going to\n14 confirm that. This is Government Exhibit Stip 14. It's a\n15 stipulation regarding bank records. And pursuant to this\n16 stipulation, at this time the government offers Government\n17 Exhibits GX-BOP-16, BOP-7, BOP-1, BOP-2, BOP-3, and BOP-4.\n18 THE COURT: Any objection?\n19 MR. BARKAN: No objection, your Honor.\n20 THE COURT: They are admitted.\n21 (Government's Exhibits BOP-16, BOP-7, BOP-1, BOP-2,\n22 BOP-3 and BOP-4 received in evidence)\n23 BY MS. MURRAY:\n24 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could please publish Government Exhibit\n25 BOP-16. Ms. Wilson, Bank of Princeton, is that institution\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 insured by any governing body?\n2 A. The FDIC.\n3 Q. Can you explain what the FDIC is?\n4 A. FDIC is the Federal Depository Institution, so they back\n5 our institution financially to cover the funds that are within\n6 our institution, and they also examine our bank to make sure\n7 we're in compliance at least every 18 months.\n8 Q. Ms. Loftus, we now have this up, if you could just flip\n9 through a few of the pages.\n10 Ms. Wilson, generally speaking do you recognize\n11 government exhibit BOP-16?\n12 A. Yes, this is the account agreement, the opening documents.\n13 Q. If we could go to the first page, Ms. Loftus.\n14 For what account?\n15 A. This is for Lamp Capital.\n16 Q. If we could zoom in all the way across the page, the top\n17 portion, please.\n18 Looking at the top right, Ms. Wilson, what is the date\n19 of this account agreement for Lamp Capital?\n20 A. September 10, 2020.\n21 Q. And over on the left a little bit below, what's the name of\n22 the signer?\n23 A. Daniel Podhaskie.\n24 Q. And under that there's the name Lamp Capital again, what is\n25 the text that's listed in the box below Lamp Capital?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 A. The newly established company.\n2 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could go to page 10, please.\n3 What is this document, Ms. Wilson?\n4 A. This is the beneficial ownership document that shows that\n5 the ultimate beneficial owners of the business.\n6 Q. Who, if anyone, completes this document?\n7 Who provides the information reflected in this\n8 document?\n9 A. The person opening the account.\n10 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could zoom in please on the top portion\n11 through to the first table.\n12 Ms. Wilson, what's the name of the person opening this\n13 account?\n14 A. Daniel Podhaskie.\n15 Q. And in B, the legal entity for this account?\n16 A. Lamp Capital.\n17 Q. Looking at section C, what is the name listed as the\n18 ultimate beneficial owner of Lamp Capital?\n19 A. Qiang Guo.\n20 Q. Can you spell that?\n21 A. Q-I-A-N-G, last name is, G-U-O.\n22 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could zoom in. What is the address\n23 associated with Qiang Guo on this document?\n24 A. It's 781 or 761 5th Avenue, New York, New York 10002.\n25 Q. What type of passport does this individual hold according\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 to this document?\n2 A. A Hong Kong passport.\n3 Q. Ms. Loftus, can we go to page 15, please.\n4 Ms. Wilson, what type of document is this?\n5 A. This is their limited liability company agreement, so it's\n6 a business document.\n7 Q. Why, if at all, does the Bank of Princeton collect business\n8 documents in the course of account openings?\n9 A. To validate the business itself that it was formed, and\n10 within the businesses usually it tells you what type of\n11 business it is, who the signers of the business are.\n12 Q. What, if anything, do you look for in the course of your\n13 BSA review in collecting corporate documents like this?\n14 A. When we collect corporate documents, we like to see when\n15 they were actually incorporated, who the signers are, what type\n16 of business they are, anyone related to the business, where\n17 they're located, where they actually registered of the\n18 business.\n19 Q. If we could focus on the top portion here, Ms. Loftus.\n20 What is the date based on this limited liability\n21 company agreement that Lamp Capital was created?\n22 A. The 8th day of September 2020.\n23 Q. And what entity is listed as the sole member of that\n24 company?\n25 A. Infinity Treasury Management, Inc.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could just briefly go back to page one,\n2 please.\n3 Ms. Wilson, what was the date that Daniel Podhaskie\n4 applied to open this bank account in the name of Lamp Capital?\n5 A. September 10, 2020.\n6 Q. Ms. Loftus, let's go back to page 19, please, just the\n7 bottom of that corporate document.\n8 Ms. Wilson, who signed the limited liability company\n9 agreement on behalf of Infinity Treasury Management?\n10 A. Daniel Podhaskie.\n11 Q. Ms. Loftus, can we go to page 33 now, please.\n12 What is this, Ms. Wilson?\n13 A. That's the QualiFile report, the check systems report.\n14 Q. Can you describe what information is reflected on a\n15 QualiFile response?\n16 A. So this is a report that's run on every business or\n17 individual opening an account, and that's run by every single\n18 bank. So when we look at this it's telling us, kind of gives\n19 you a suggestion whether to open or deny the account. And if\n20 somebody had recently opened accounts at other institutions or\n21 had charge offs at other institutions, we would be able to see\n22 it here.\n23 Q. Can we go to the next page, please, Ms. Loftus. And if you\n24 could focus in on inquiry details down to the end of details\n25 two.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 If you could just explain a little bit of what\n2 information is on this report, Ms. Wilson?\n3 A. Yeah. So that's where you can see where it says 8/30/2020,\n4 Daniel Podhaskie had also gone to NexBank to inquire and open\n5 an account. So he got through the process of opening the\n6 account with their institution, whether they actually opened it\n7 or not, they probably did if they ran him. And then again you\n8 have Santander bank on 9/15/2020. He also went to that\n9 institution to inquire and open an account.\n10 Q. We can take that down, Ms. Loftus. Thank you.\n11 Were any Lamp Capital accounts opened at Bank of\n12 Princeton?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Did there come a time when the Lamp Capital signer opened\n15 another account at Bank of Princeton?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. What was the name on that account?\n18 A. Greenwich Land.\n19 Q. Approximately when was that Greenwich Land account opened?\n20 A. That was also September of 2020.\n21 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we could please publish what's in evidence\n22 as Government Exhibit BOP-7.\n23 Ms. Wilson, what is this document?\n24 A. That's the opening documents, the account agreement.\n25 Q. If we could focus on the top portion all the way across the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 top please, Ms. Loftus.\n2 What is the date of this account opening document?\n3 A. 9/23/2020.\n4 Q. And looking at the right, the account title and the\n5 individual associated with this account?\n6 A. Greenwich Land, LLC and Daniel Podhaskie.\n7 Q. And then looking over on the left under owner/signer\n8 information, what is listed as the occupation for Daniel\n9 Podhaskie?\n10 A. Attorney.\n11 Q. If we could go to page three, please, Ms. Loftus.\n12 Ms. Wilson, again, what is this type of document?\n13 A. That's the Ultimate Beneficial Ownership document.\n14 Q. If we could focus on the top portion, Ms. Loftus.\n15 In the table in item C, Ms. Wilson, who is listed here\n16 as the beneficial owner of the Greenwich Land?\n17 A. Hing Chi Ngok.\n18 Q. All right. Ms. Loftus, if we could go to page eight,\n19 please.\n20 What type of record is this, Ms. Wilson?\n21 A. That's the resolution for the business, and anybody opening\n22 the account are going to have authority over the account signs\n23 this.\n24 Q. Zoom out of that, Ms. Loftus, and go to the next page, the\n25 next page, and the next page. If we could focus on the top\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 portion. On what date was this limited liability company\n2 established?\n3 A. This was signed September 22, 2020.\n4 Q. And who signed on behalf of the company?\n5 A. Daniel Podhaskie.\n6 Q. So that's September 22, 2020.\n7 Ms. Loftus, can we go back to page one, please.\n8 What was the date that Daniel Podhaskie applied for\n9 the Greenwich Land bank account at Bank of Princeton?\n10 A. September 23, 2020.\n11 Q. Let's go to page 17, please, Ms. Loftus.\n12 Ms. Wilson, is this the QualiFile response for the\n13 Greenwich Land account?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And going to the next page, page 18, if we could zoom in on\n16 the text here.\n17 How many inquiries were there that were relevant to\n18 the Greenwich Land bank account?\n19 A. Four.\n20 Q. And can you read the dates and the banks that were\n21 associated with those inquiries?\n22 A. NexBank, Santander Bank, Signature Bank and the Bank of\n23 Princeton.\n24 Q. Can you explain why, if at all, Bank of Princeton would\n25 appear on its own QualiFile response?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 A. They ran his name through QualiFile on 9/16 also, and then\n2 was running it again on 9/23.\n3 Q. Ms. Loftus, can we go to page 23, please.\n4 What is this, Ms. Wilson?\n5 A. That's a new account check list that the branches fill out\n6 for the businesses to make sure that we have everything, as far\n7 as BSA goes and legal wise goes so we have the proper documents\n8 for businesses and individuals.\n9 Q. If we can go to the next page, please, Ms. Loftus. Looking\n10 about halfway down the page in bold, there's an, If other\n11 field, if we could zoom in on that.\n12 Ms. Wilson, what information does this form reflect\n13 about the type of business that Greenwich Land was?\n14 A. Capitol management.\n15 Q. All right. Ms. Loftus, we can take that down.\n16 Ms. Wilson, in the course of your duties as a BSA\n17 officer, did you monitor the Lamp Capital and the Greenwich\n18 Land accounts after they were opened?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. What, if anything, did you observe about the activity in\n21 those accounts?\n22 A. The activity coming in both accounts were funded with a\n23 higher than normal amount of money than I've seen at the Bank\n24 of Princeton in my 11 years there. And then the money that\n25 started going out of the accounts were not really in line with\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 what we thought a capital management or a real estate business\n2 should, or wasn't in line of what I've seen or would be typical\n3 for that type of business.\n4 Q. What type of activity did you observe that in your opinion\n5 wasn't in line with typical activity?\n6 A. The funds going out, there were two large checks to the\n7 beneficial owners, one from each of the businesses to the\n8 beneficial owners of those businesses. They went to car\n9 dealerships, wineries, a yacht, not in line with just that\n10 business.\n11 MS. MURRAY: Your Honor, pursuant to the stipulation\n12 GX-Stip 14, I also offer Government Exhibit GX-BOP-12 and\n13 GX-BOP-10.\n14 THE COURT: No objection.\n15 MR. BARKAN: No objection your Honor.\n16 THE COURT: They are admitted.\n17 (Government's Exhibits BOP-12 and BOP-10 received in\n18 evidence)\n19 BY MS. MURRAY:\n20 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we can please publish GX-BOP-12.\n21 Ms. Wilson, while we're pulling that up, did you\n22 observe any OFAC hits in the Greenwich Land or the Lamp Capital\n23 accounts?\n24 A. No OFAC matches.\n25 Q. Ms. Wilson, what is this?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 A. That's a bank statement.\n2 Q. Looking at the top, for what account is the bank statement?\n3 A. For Lamp Capital, LLC.\n4 Q. And the statement ending date on the top right?\n5 A. 10/30/020.\n6 Q. If we could focus on the summary of accounts down to the\n7 bottom of the page, please, Ms. Loftus.\n8 Looking at the summary of accounts, Ms. Wilson, what\n9 was the ending balance for this pay period for this Lamp\n10 Capital statement?\n11 A. $4,230,400.\n12 Q. And I want to look at a view of the different transactions\n13 that are reflected here. Under other credits the second entry\n14 there, what is the date of that incoming wire?\n15 A. 10/15/2020.\n16 Q. From a bank account held in the name of what entity?\n17 A. Savio Law, LLC.\n18 Q. And the amount of that incoming wire into the Lamp Capital\n19 account?\n20 A. Five million.\n21 Q. And if we could go to page three please, Ms. Loftus.\n22 Focus in on the content on the top. Looking at the\n23 third item here, Ms. Loftus, what is the date of that outgoing\n24 wire?\n25 A. 10/29/2020.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 Q. Where does it go?\n2 A. Moran Yacht Management, Inc.\n3 Q. What is the dollar amount of that outgoing wire from the\n4 Lamp Capital account?\n5 A. $272,525.\n6 Q. Ms. Loftus, we can take that down, and let's put up\n7 Government Exhibit BOP-10, please.\n8 What is this, Ms. Wilson?\n9 A. It's another bank statement.\n10 Q. For what account?\n11 A. Greenwich Land.\n12 Q. And what is the statement sending date?\n13 A. 10/30/2020.\n14 Q. Again, if we could focus in here on the top portion from\n15 summary of accounts through to the bottom.\n16 What was the ending balance in the Greenwich Land\n17 account on October 30, 2020?\n18 A. Almost 10 million.\n19 Q. And looking at the incoming wires listed here, if we could\n20 just take them one at a time, the three of those incoming\n21 wires, the date, where it came from, and the dollar amount?\n22 A. Yep, 10/15/2020, there's an incoming wire from Savio Law,\n23 LLC for five million.\n24 On 10/21/2020, there's an incoming wire from ACA\n25 Capital Group, LTD for $999,893.22, and on 10/23/2020, another\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 incoming wire from ACA Capital Group for almost four million.\n2 Q. And then if we could look at the bottom of this portion\n3 other debits, the second to the last debit reflected there, if\n4 you could read that for, that's October 26?\n5 A. An outgoing wire to Sherry-Lehman, Inc. for 32,220.\n6 Q. Do you know what type of company or business Sherry-Lehman,\n7 Inc. is?\n8 A. I don't remember exactly what their business was.\n9 Q. If we could take that down, Ms. Loftus, and show the\n10 witness what's marked as Government Exhibit BOP-40.\n11 Ms. Wilson, do you recognize this?\n12 A. That's an email.\n13 Q. If we could scroll through the pages, Ms. Loftus.\n14 Have you seen this email before, Ms. Wilson?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Did you receive this email?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 MS. MURRAY: Your Honor, the government offers\n19 Government Exhibit BOP-40.\n20 MR. BARKAN: No objection, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n22 (Government's Exhibit BOP-40 received in evidence)\n23 MS. MURRAY: And we can publish that.\n24 Q. Starting at the top, and then we'll kind of work our way\n25 through the chain, Ms. Wilson. What is the date of the top\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 portion of this email chain?\n2 A. December 18, 2020.\n3 Q. And this is an email from you to whom?\n4 A. From me to my assistant BSA officer.\n5 Q. What is the subject of the full email chain here?\n6 A. Incoming wires for Greenwich Land.\n7 Q. And there's an attachment to this email, what is the title\n8 of that attachment?\n9 A. Loan agreement ACA verse Greenwich need to sign PDF.\n10 Q. Let's go to page three, Ms. Loftus.\n11 Focusing on the email that begins about a third of the\n12 way down of the page, who is Miriam Colon?\n13 A. She was the branch manager for our New Brunswick office.\n14 Q. What is the date of this outgoing email from Miriam Colon?\n15 A. November 19, 2020.\n16 Q. Who is it sent to?\n17 A. Haitham Khaled and Daniel Podhaskie.\n18 Q. What's the domain name of the email address for Haitham\n19 Khaled?\n20 A. Crane Advisory Group.\n21 Q. Do you know what Crane Advisory Group is?\n22 A. That was the investment advisory firm that he worked for.\n23 Q. And what about the email domain for Daniel Podhaskie?\n24 A. It was Lamp Capital.\n25 Q. So if you could read just the first two lines of this email\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 from Miriam Colon, actually the first three lines of the email?\n2 A. Good morning, gentlemen. Hope your day is going well. My\n3 compliance department is conducting a retrospective review of\n4 this payment.\n5 Q. Now there's text that's in black and there's text that's in\n6 red. Do you see that?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. If we could zoom out, Ms. Loftus, and go up just a few\n9 pages, and look at the bottom of this first page. If we could\n10 zoom in, Ms. Loftus.\n11 Who is this email from?\n12 A. That's from Daniel Podhaskie.\n13 Q. On what date?\n14 A. On December 2, 2020.\n15 Q. Who does he send it to?\n16 A. To Miriam Colon the branch manager and copied Haitham\n17 Khaled.\n18 Q. And the content of this email reads, Hi, Miriam. I have\n19 put the requested information below in red, and the requested\n20 supporting documentation is attached. Do you see that?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Let's go back to page three, please, Ms. Loftus. I'd to\n23 zoom in on that email.\n24 Ms. Wilson, what information was Bank of Princeton\n25 requesting from Lamp Capital in item one here?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 A. We were trying to find out ACA Capital Group's business\n2 activities, their contact information, their physical address,\n3 phone number, so who ACA Capital was and more information about\n4 that business.\n5 Q. Why, if at all, were you requesting additional information\n6 about that business?\n7 A. Because they had sent a high amount of funds into the Bank\n8 of Princeton to a new client of ours.\n9 Q. And looking at item two here, the request from Miriam Colon\n10 is, Please provide organization structure chart for ACA Capital\n11 Group Limited, and indicate beneficial owners.\n12 What was the response from Lamp Capital to that\n13 request?\n14 A. They were not in possession of that information.\n15 Q. Looking at item three where the Bank of Princeton request\n16 the industry that Greenwich Land is operating, and additional\n17 identifying details. Can you read the text in red which is the\n18 response from Greenwich Land?\n19 A. Greenwich Land is a real estate holding company\n20 incorporated for the purpose of owning and managing real estate\n21 assets. The physical address is 667 Madison Avenue, 5th floor,\n22 New York, New York 10065. It's a privately owned entity that\n23 is not marketing to the public, and therefore does not current\n24 have a website. The phone number is 917-225-8178. The email\n25 address is DanielP@LampCapital.org. Greenwich Land's beneficial\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 owner is Hing Chi Ngok.\n2 Q. And then in item four which request the relationship\n3 between ACA Capital Group and the beneficiary Greenwich Land,\n4 LLC, what is the response from the customer there?\n5 A. ACA is a lender and Greenwich Land is the borrower.\n6 Q. If we can zoom out, Ms. Loftus, and focus on the response\n7 for five into the next page. So detail purpose down through\n8 the end.\n9 Ms. Wilson, Miriam Colon's requests the purpose of the\n10 following payments. On 10/20/2020, a payment in the amount of\n11 $999,913.22. Is that the payment we just looked at that was\n12 reflected in the account statement?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And the second payment that Miriam colon is requesting\n15 information for, what payment is that?\n16 A. On 10/22/2020 in the amount of $3,999,935. That was another\n17 payment from ACA that we just saw on the statement.\n18 Q. And looking then further down the email, the bank request\n19 documentation, what response does Greenwich Land give in\n20 response to that request?\n21 A. Both transactions are part of a loan agreement. Please see\n22 attached loan agreement.\n23 Q. Now, the bank request the information within 14 days. Do\n24 you see that?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 Q. Ms. Loftus, let's look again at what the date was of the\n2 request was of Ms. Colon?\n3 A. November 19, 2020.\n4 Q. And we can zoom out and just scroll up the chain. Stop\n5 there for a moment so we can see this email.\n6 On November 24, 2020, there's an outgoing email from\n7 Miriam Colon, what does that email say?\n8 A. Following up. Hope your day is going well. Please see\n9 email sent on November 18. I need to respond to my compliance\n10 department on this. Can you please provide information\n11 requested.\n12 Q. And we can zoom out, Ms. Loftus, and go up again.\n13 On what date does Daniel Podhaskie respond to Miriam\n14 Colon?\n15 A. On the 24th he said, Thanks for following up. We'll get\n16 back shortly.\n17 Q. And then what happens on December 1, 2020?\n18 A. She requested a follow-up again.\n19 Q. And scroll up please, Ms. Loftus.\n20 And then looking here at the bottom of page one, on\n21 what date does Daniel Podhaskie provide the requested\n22 information?\n23 A. December 2nd.\n24 Q. If we could look at the top of this page please, Ms.\n25 Loftus. In particular the email that you write Ms. Wilson.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 What do you write in your email here?\n2 A. This is for Greenwich Land and the relationship between ACA\n3 Capital. These are the answers we received from the customer.\n4 I wanted to follow-up on the information. We could go over it\n5 on Monday when I got back with my assistant.\n6 Q. We can zoom out, and let's look at the attachment to this\n7 email, Ms. Loftus. It's a few pages down. If we could zoom in\n8 on the top portion here.\n9 Ms. Wilson, is this a document that Daniel Podhaskie\n10 provided to the bank in response to its inquiry?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. What is the title of this document?\n13 A. Loan agreement.\n14 Q. What is the date of the agreement?\n15 A. October 16, 2020.\n16 Q. And who are the parties, looking first at party one?\n17 A. ACA Capital Group and Greenwich Land, LLC.\n18 Q. Let's zoom out, please, Ms. Loftus. And focus on the loan\n19 which is item two here.\n20 Ms. Wilson, in the first sentence of this paragraph,\n21 what is the loan amount for this loan agreement?\n22 A. Five million.\n23 Q. We can zoom out again, Ms. Loftus. Can we scroll down,\n24 please. Is there one more page or is that the end? We can\n25 zoom in on the signature lines, please.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 What entity is listed as signing on behalf of ACA\n2 Capital Group Limited?\n3 A. Celestial Tide Limited.\n4 Q. And how is Celestial Tide Limited described?\n5 A. The director of ACA Capital Group Limited.\n6 Q. All right. Ms. Loftus, we can take that down.\n7 Ms. Wilson, did there come a time when a company\n8 called G/Club Operations applied to open an account at Bank of\n9 Princeton?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Approximately when was that?\n12 A. That was at the end of September beginning of October.\n13 Q. Of what year?\n14 A. 2020.\n15 Q. How, if at all, did you become aware of that account\n16 application?\n17 A. They were also brought to us from the same investment\n18 advisor.\n19 Q. Did you conduct a BSA review of that account?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. What, if anything, do you recall about the G/Club account\n22 opening materials?\n23 A. The opening documents they had formed them in Puerto Rico,\n24 the business formation was in Puerto Rico, and they had an\n25 address listed in Puerto Rico and in New York. They had their\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 SS4, but none of the signers that were going to be on the\n2 business account were on the business formation documents, and\n3 the beneficial open was a non-resident alien.\n4 Q. You said SS4, what does that refer to?\n5 A. SS4 is their EIN number. So it's a letter from the IRS\n6 assigning an EIN number to the business, such as you get your\n7 social security number. That's their sole identifier.\n8 Q. Ms. Loftus, can we please publish Government Exhibit BOP-1.\n9 Ms. Wilson, is this the account agreement for that\n10 account you just mentioned G/Club Operations?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Can we focus on the top portion, Ms. Loftus, on the left\n13 side. What is the full name of the institution for this\n14 account?\n15 A. G/Club Operations, LLC.\n16 Q. And what is the address listed for G/Club Operations, LLC?\n17 A. 590 Madison Avenue, 21st floor, New York, New York 10022.\n18 Q. Now there's a handwritten annotation under that address.\n19 Do you see that?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. What does it say?\n22 A. Correct address.\n23 Q. Ms. Loftus, if we can please pull up alongside this what's\n24 in evidence as Government Exhibit SW-2009. If we could zoom in\n25 on the top portion from through to the address that's listed\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 there as center.\n2 Ms. Wilson, do you see to whom this email on the right\n3 side was sent?\n4 A. HaithamK@CraneAdvisoryGroup.com.\n5 Q. To whom is it address?\n6 A. To Yvette Wang.\n7 Q. And looking on the right there, there's a field called\n8 center. Do you see that?\n9 A. I'm sorry. Say that again.\n10 Q. Sure. There's transaction for the value. There are a few\n11 fields under transaction details. What is listed under center?\n12 A. New York, New York, City, 590 Madison Ave, 590 Madison Ave,\n13 New York City 10022.\n14 Q. And two lines down, what is the authorization date\n15 associated with that transaction?\n16 A. October 14, 2020.\n17 Q. Keeping that up, Ms. Loftus, looking on the left at the\n18 Bank of Princeton account agreement for G/Club Operations, if\n19 we could focus on the owner/signer information there.\n20 Who is listed as the owner/signer of this account?\n21 A. Yvette Wang.\n22 Q. And the address that we just went over on the top here\n23 that's listed, is that the same address that's listed on the\n24 document on the right?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 Q. If we could zoom out of that, Ms. Loftus, and we'll just\n2 focus again on BOP-1. We can take down SW-2009. Let's go to\n3 page three, please, focus on the top portion. Actually, all\n4 the way down to the bottom of the text here. This is on the\n5 bottom right.\n6 Ms. Wilson, what is the date the account was opened?\n7 A. 10/30/2020.\n8 Q. On the top left, what is the name of the second signer on\n9 this account?\n10 A. Alex Hadjicharalambous.\n11 Q. And what is Alex Hadjicharalambous' occupation listed as\n12 here?\n13 A. Comptroller.\n14 Q. Let's go to page eight, please, Ms. Loftus.\n15 Again, Ms. Wilson, what type of document is this?\n16 A. That's the limited liability company authorization\n17 resolution.\n18 Q. And looking here, for what company?\n19 A. For G/Club Operations.\n20 Q. And what is the address listed for G/Club Operations on\n21 this corporate document?\n22 A. 590 Madison Avenue, 21st Floor New York, New York 10022.\n23 Q. And do you see the two signers here on the account?\n24 A. Yvette Wang and Alex H.\n25 Q. Are those the same signers who were listed above in the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 account opening documentation?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. Let's go to page 13, please. If we could focus, Ms.\n4 Loftus, on that portion down to the bottom.\n5 What is the name of this scanned passport?\n6 A. Yanping Wang.\n7 Q. And what is the issuing country of this passport?\n8 A. China.\n9 Q. And then if we could focus on the handwritten information\n10 on the bottom here, Ms. Loftus.\n11 What does that say, Ms. Wilson?\n12 A. Second form of ID, occupation manager.\n13 Q. Let's go to the next page, page 14.\n14 What is this an image of, Ms. Wilson?\n15 A. A credit card.\n16 Q. Why, if at all, would Bank of Princeton collect a scan of a\n17 credit card in connection with an account opening?\n18 A. That can be used as a second form of ID for an individual.\n19 Q. And what is the individual's name listed on this credit\n20 card?\n21 A. Golden Spring, New York. And it's Yanping Wang.\n22 Q. Let's go to page 21, please.\n23 Again, Ms. Wilson, is this the beneficial owner\n24 certification for the G/Club Operation's account?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 Q. And looking through to the table, the person opening the\n2 account listed as Alex H, correct?\n3 A. Correct.\n4 Q. And then the name and address of the legal entity is the\n5 same as we've been looking at in the account opening\n6 documentation?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. What is the name of the ultimate beneficial owner of\n9 G/Clubs according to this document?\n10 A. He, Haoran.\n11 Q. Can you spell that?\n12 A. H-E, last name is, H-A-O-R-A-N.\n13 Q. And looking at the address field, can you read that\n14 address?\n15 A. 79 East Works Drive Cofton, Hackett, UK.\n16 Q. At the bottom if we could focus on the portion through --\n17 to the date.\n18 What date was this form submitted?\n19 A. October 29, 2020.\n20 Q. And this is a corporate document for G/Clubs that was\n21 provided to Bank of Princeton; is that correct?\n22 A. Yes, this is a form the bank gives them to fill out to\n23 explain who their beneficial owners are.\n24 Q. And, Ms. Loftus, if we can go to page 25.\n25 Ms. Wilson, what type of document is this?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 A. This is a certificate of organization for the business for\n2 G/Club.\n3 Q. Looking at this, where was G/Club organized?\n4 A. Puerto Rico.\n5 Q. And on what date?\n6 A. October 7, 2020.\n7 THE COURT: All righty. It's now 3 p.m., so our work\n8 has come to an end for the day. Members of the jury, remember\n9 that you're not allowed to discuss the case amongst yourselves\n10 or with anyone else. Don't permit anyone to discuss the case\n11 in your presence. Don't read, watch, or listen to anything\n12 from any source about anything having to do with the subject\n13 matter of this trial. Have a good evening. I'll see you ready\n14 to come into the courtroom tomorrow at 9:30. Thank you.\n15 THE LAW CLERK: Jury exiting.\n16 (Jury not present)\n17 THE COURT: You may step out. Don't discuss your\n18 testimony.\n19 (Witness temporarily excused)\n20 (Continued on next page)\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6DBGUO4 Wilson- Direct\n1 (Jury not present)\n2 THE COURT: Please be seated. Who do we expect to\n3 testify tomorrow?\n4 MS. MURRAY: So we'll be continuing with Ms. Wilson\n5 and then we will have Sam Roberts who is a Bitgo employee that\n6 we discussed earlier, and then Bo Collins. And with respect to\n7 Mr. Collins, we don't anticipate that we will get past his\n8 direct examination tomorrow. But with respect to the issue we\n9 had flagged this morning on the documents, we've spoken with\n10 defense counsel. And our proposal, if it's acceptable to the\n11 Court, in the very unlikely event that we did complete his\n12 direct examination tomorrow, we would request to then adjourn\n13 for the day to give the defense the benefit of the weekend to\n14 prepare his cross. Again, I think it's extremely unlikely that\n15 will be the timeline. I suspect he will still be on direct\n16 when the day ends.\n17 THE COURT: Anything else?\n18 MS. MURRAY: Nothing from the government.\n19 THE COURT: All righty. Thank you. Please have the\n20 witness on the stand at 9:29 tomorrow. Have a good evening.\n21 (Adjourned to June 14, 2024 at 9:00 a.m.)\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\n1 INDEX OF EXAMINATION\n2 Examination of: Page\n3 MINRAN WU\n4 Direct By Mr. Fergenson . . . . . . . . . . .2393\n5 Cross By Mr. Schirick . . . . . . . . . . . .2431\n6 Redirect By Mr. Fergenson . . . . . . . . . .2499\n7 Recross By Mr. Schirick . . . . . . . . . . .2506\n8 Redirect By Mr. Fergenson . . . . . . . . . .2513\n9 KIMBERLY ESPINOZA\n10 Direct By Mr. Finkel . . . . . . . . . . . . .2514\n11 Cross By Mr. Schirick . . . . . . . . . . . .2530\n12 JAMIE WILSON\n13 Direct By Ms. Murray . . . . . . . . . . . . .2536\n14 GOVERNMENT EXHIBITS\n15 Exhibit No. Received\n16 VNB1-3, IDB1, IDB3, IDB4, IDB7, SIG1, . . . .2515\n17 SIL4, SIL3, SIL40\n18 CAP623 and CAP624 . . . . . . . . . . . . .2516\n19 BOP-16, BOP-7, BOP-1, BOP-2, BOP-3 and . . .2542\n20 BOP-4\n21 BOP-12 and BOP-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . .2551\n22 VN-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2413\n23 Z12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2517\n24 VN13 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2410\n25 VN-37 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2420\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\n1 VN39 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2394\n2 BOP-40 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2554\n3 BR451 and BR452 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2515\n4 DEFENDANT EXHIBITS\n5 Exhibit No. Received\n6 7003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2509\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300","body_zh":null,"key_entities":[],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":40480,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-07-23 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-07-23","updated_at":"2026-07-06 20:52:27"}