{"id":"court_sdny_441_0","court":"SDNY","case_no":"","doc_number":441,"sub_number":null,"doc_type":"DOC","filed_date":"2024-07-23","title":"SDNY ECF 441","summary_zh":null,"summary_en":null,"body_en":"O6Q1GUO1\n1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n2 ------------------------------x\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,\n3\nv. 23 Cr. 118 (AT)\n4\nMILES GUO,\n5\nDefendant. Trial\n6 ------------------------------x\nNew York, N.Y.\n7 June 26, 2024\n9:00 a.m.\n8\nBefore:\n9\n10 HON. ANALISA TORRES,\n11 District Judge\n-and a Jury-\n12\nAPPEARANCES\n13\nDAMIAN WILLIAMS\n14 United States Attorney for the\nSouthern District of New York\n15 BY: MICAH F. FERGENSON\nRYAN B. FINKEL\n16 JUSTIN HORTON\nJULIANA N. MURRAY\n17 Assistant United States Attorneys\n18 SABRINA P. SHROFF\nAttorney for Defendant\n19\nPRYOR CASHMAN LLP\n20 Attorneys for Defendant\nBY: SIDHARDHA KAMARAJU\n21 MATTHEW BARKAN\n22 ALSTON & BIRD LLP\nAttorneys for Defendant\n23 BY: E. SCOTT SCHIRICK\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 ALSO PRESENT:\nIsabel Loftus, Paralegal Specialist, USAO\n2 Robert Stout, Special Agent, FBI\nJorge Salazar, Defense Paralegal\n3 Tuo Huang, Interpreter (Mandarin)\nShi Feng, Interpreter (Mandarin)\n4 Yu Mark Tang, Interpreter (Mandarin)\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 (Trial resumed; jury not present)\n2 THE COURT: Good morning.\n3 ALL COUNSEL: Good morning, your Honor.\n4 THE COURT: Please make your appearances.\n5 MR. FERGENSON: Good morning, your Honor. Micah\n6 Fergenson and Justin Horton for the United States.\n7 MS. SHROFF: For Mr. Ho Wan Kwok, Sabrina Shroff and\n8 Scott Schirick. Good morning, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Please be seated.\n10 Is there anything before we get started at 9:30?\n11 MR. FERGENSON: Yes, your Honor. I think we had two\n12 points.\n13 One, and I don't want to raise something that the\n14 proper defense counsel is not here to respond to, but just to\n15 inform the Court of an issue. Maybe we can take it up at\n16 lunchtime. We've been working very well with the defense on\n17 stipulations, translations, and we appreciate their assistance\n18 in making this a more efficient trial. There is one recording\n19 that we have agreement on with the defense. It was a recording\n20 that was part of Mr. Shamel Medrano's, you know, large summary\n21 chart of videos that we redacted because we were still working\n22 on translations for that video. I think we've reached\n23 agreement on the translation of it, your Honor, and we've\n24 reached agreement that, you know, for what actually goes back\n25 into evidence, we can use an updated version of Mr. Medrano's\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 chart that includes this video and the translated text. There\n2 is one portion of the translated transcript that we have a\n3 dispute about. It's not a translation dispute; it's a Rule 403\n4 dispute. And I won't get ahead of it because I want\n5 Mr. Kamaraju or Mr. Barkan, who I've discussed this with more\n6 recently, to be here to address it as well, but just very\n7 briefly to preview it. It's about two lines of text where\n8 Mr. Guo says something to the effect of: \"The United States\n9 will never falsely accuse you. Listen to what I say. The\n10 United States will never falsely accuse you.\" The context for\n11 this remark is, in 2020, when the investigations into GTV\n12 begin, Mr. Guo is broadcasting that essentially the people who\n13 are complaining to the U.S. authorities are in fact fake\n14 victims and CCP spies or traitors, and they're going to be\n15 criminally charged by the United States, and he makes this\n16 remark about how the United States will never falsely accuse\n17 you. Our view is, there's nothing unfairly prejudicial about\n18 using, you know, an opposing party's statement against legal\n19 interests. That's sort of the heartland of what an opposing\n20 party admission is. You know, criminal defendants confess in\n21 some instances, and confessions are admissible at trial. And\n22 so our view is there's no 403 issue here really, if a statement\n23 by the defendant is clearly admissible. But I don't want to\n24 get ahead of myself. We can take it up——unless the defense\n25 wants to take it up now.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 THE COURT: So we need not hear now because neither of\n2 those attorneys are here, but your understanding is that the\n3 defense position is that the statement is unfairly prejudicial?\n4 MR. FERGENSON: Yes, your Honor.\n5 THE COURT: Okay. Anything else?\n6 MR. FERGENSON: There was one other matter that\n7 Mr. Horton wanted to address, given that we are hopeful, but\n8 not certain, we may rest today, and I'll let Mr. Horton address\n9 that.\n10 MR. HORTON: Thank you, your Honor.\n11 Your Honor had indicated one day last week that the\n12 Court would like the government to make a formal application\n13 pursuant to Geaney for the admission of co-conspirator\n14 statements that came in at trial, so I just want to address\n15 that briefly.\n16 In six weeks of testimony, give or take——\n17 THE COURT: So is this what you're offering at this\n18 time?\n19 MR. HORTON: If the Court wishes, I'm happy to make\n20 that application now.\n21 THE COURT: Go right ahead.\n22 MR. HORTON: So we've had something like six weeks of\n23 testimony and documentary evidence at trial about a sprawling,\n24 interconnected series of racketeering and fraud conspiracies\n25 that were global in nature, extensive in time, and really\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 depended on communication as sort of their fuel and lifeblood.\n2 And there's been a considerable amount of co-conspirator\n3 statements and documents reflecting those statements offered\n4 into evidence subject to connection under the circuit's Geaney\n5 protocol.\n6 I'll just start with the top and say that the\n7 standard, of course, is a preponderance, so the Court needs\n8 only find that it's more likely than not that these declarants\n9 were members of conspiracies with the defendant, and spoke\n10 during and in furtherance of those conspiracies. I'll start\n11 right at the top with Ms. Wang, who pled guilty to——\n12 THE COURT: One moment, please.\n13 MR. HORTON: Sure.\n14 THE COURT: You're going to specify the individuals,\n15 correct?\n16 MR. HORTON: So I think what I'll do, your Honor, is\n17 sort of go somewhat in order, and then, you know, given the\n18 nature of these conspiracies, there are a number of\n19 co-conspirators and agents who were not quite at the periphery,\n20 people who were not like Yvette Wang, really.\n21 THE COURT: If you could bring the microphone closer\n22 to you. You said that there were a number of co-conspirators——\n23 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, I apologize. Two of our team\n24 members are not here, but I wanted to just apologize and ask\n25 the Court if I could just flag for the Court one issue.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 There is a witness that's supposed to testify this\n2 afternoon and we do not know what subset of exhibits are being\n3 used for that witness. I'm happy to let Mr. Horton continue,\n4 but as to Ms. Chen, the government has identified only a wide\n5 number of exhibits. I believe Ms. Tilton emailed the\n6 government yesterday for a narrower subset. We have not yet\n7 received it. While Mr. Horton is making this argument to the\n8 Court——which I apologize again for interrupting——if the lawyer\n9 who is in charge of the Chen direct could just please send us\n10 the exhibit numbers, it would be very helpful to us. Thank\n11 you.\n12 MR. FERGENSON: We'll be sure to do that, your Honor.\n13 I'm not familiar with that exhibit set, but we'll be sure to\n14 send them the specific exhibits. The way we numbered the\n15 exhibits for victim witnesses is that each victim witness has\n16 its own exhibit series, so, I mean, we can identify the\n17 specific ones within that, but it is identified at least by the\n18 exhibit series.\n19 THE COURT: So you'll do that right away.\n20 MR. FERGENSON: We will, your Honor.\n21 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor——\n22 THE COURT: One moment.\n23 MS. SHROFF: Oh, sorry.\n24 THE COURT: You had something further, Ms. Shroff?\n25 MS. SHROFF: Yes, your Honor. I know Mr. Hinton is\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 still going, but for Ms. Chen, we've also received some 3500\n2 material with new Bates stamp numbering, so if there's any\n3 additional 3500 between yesterday and today, we would\n4 appreciate receiving that as well.\n5 That's all. Thank you, your Honor.\n6 THE COURT: Thank you.\n7 Okay. So I interrupted Mr. Horton, and if you want to\n8 backtrack, you may. I specifically wanted to make sure that I\n9 have the specific names.\n10 Go ahead. Go ahead.\n11 MR. HORTON: So there were a number of repeat-player\n12 co-conspirators, so to speak, that your Honor saw evidence\n13 about in this case.\n14 Starting with Ms. Wang, who your Honor noted early in\n15 trial, there was a colloquy with defense counsel about the\n16 admissibility of some of her statements, and at the break we\n17 talked about the fact that she had pled guilty in fact to\n18 conspiring with the defendant and so her statements came in for\n19 the rest of the trial.\n20 William Je, a key co-conspirator. There was evidence\n21 about his ownership and control of certain key entities on\n22 behalf of the defendant, his transfer of funds between those\n23 entities on behalf of the defendant, including proceeds that\n24 were retained by himself, and his cooperation with other\n25 co-conspirators, including the one I'll go to next, Mileson\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 Guo.\n2 There's evidence about Mileson Guo's use of fraud\n3 proceeds to purchase luxury goods. There's documentary\n4 evidence of Mileson Guo's communications on behalf of entities\n5 in the G enterprise. Mileson Guo connects to Haoran He.\n6 There is extensive evidence, including from witnesses\n7 who dealt with Mr. He directly, about his role as the paper\n8 owner of and operator of a large number of significant G\n9 Enterprise entities, and of course, he sort of takes center\n10 stage at G|CLUBS, through the testimony of Ms. Reyes and many\n11 of the documents your Honor saw where he is giving direction\n12 for G|CLUBS purportedly as its owner, and of course other\n13 evidence suggested that he was doing that in connection and\n14 conspiracy with the defendant and the defendant's other\n15 co-conspirators.\n16 So those are the sort of core co-conspirators in the\n17 case. And of course there was other evidence that came in.\n18 Some of it was resolved in realtime. It was somebody who made\n19 one or just several appearances. And so we——\n20 THE COURT: So Yanping Wang, William Je, Mileson Guo,\n21 and Haoran He, correct?\n22 MR. HORTON: That's right. I would call those the\n23 core co-conspirators. Of course, there's evidence about Aaron\n24 Mitchell, Victor Cerda, etc. I would just draw the Court's\n25 attention to two things. So co-conspirators and agents——and of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 course the co-conspirator exception is just the sort of more\n2 specific species of 801(b)(2) which deals with agent statements\n3 in general. When somebody came up and they weren't a repeat\n4 player, so to speak, we often went to sidebar and we litigated\n5 that in realtime and pointed the Court to evidence that had\n6 come in or was about to come in and the Court ruled during the\n7 course of trial.\n8 So just to set that stage and reiterate that the\n9 standard is a preponderance, we think that there's evidence\n10 beyond a reasonable doubt that the elements are met, that if a\n11 conspiracy existed, that the co-conspirator declarants were\n12 members of that conspiracy with the defendant, and that the\n13 statements that we offered, to the extent we offered them for\n14 their truth——and of course the Court saw, not all of these\n15 co-conspirator and agent statements were offered for their\n16 truth; some of them were offered for their falsity, some of\n17 them were offered for their effects on the witness or other\n18 people, but to the extent that they were offered for their\n19 truth——we'd submit that the evidence over the last six weeks\n20 surpasses that preponderance standard that the Court uses in\n21 making its Geaney finding. And as Mr. Fergenson said, we're\n22 hopeful to rest today, and we'd submit that the Court has more\n23 than enough evidence it needs to make that finding today.\n24 THE COURT: So I believe that the case law calls for\n25 me to make any findings after the close of the prosecution's\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 case, and I just don't want to deviate from the formality.\n2 MR. HORTON: I just wanted to tee it up for your\n3 Honor. That's all.\n4 THE COURT: Okay. Anything further?\n5 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, I wasn't sure if the Court\n6 wanted to hear from us or if we could respond when it is\n7 properly brought at the end of the government's case, or after\n8 the close of the government's case. Obviously we had no notice\n9 that the government was going to address this issue this\n10 morning. I don't think Mr. Kamaraju was alerted either. So we\n11 would appreciate additional time.\n12 I would note just two short points here. One, the\n13 conspiracy has to exist prior to the admittance of the\n14 statement, and a generic statement by the government counsel\n15 that a conspiracy existed over a six-week——I think it's been\n16 six weeks, although I've lost count——trial I do not think meets\n17 even the preponderance standard. And the government, at least\n18 this morning, has just sort of generally addressed Ms. Wang,\n19 Mileson, Mr. He, and William Je. I think there were issues\n20 with statements made by others, including Dara Lawall. And we\n21 would like an opportunity to make sure we have the transcript\n22 pages ready for the Court and be better prepared before\n23 addressing it. Since it should be done after the close of the\n24 government's case, we will endeavor to be ready.\n25 THE COURT: And what is the spelling of the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1\n1 individual's name that you just mentioned?\n2 MS. SHROFF: The first name is D-A-R-A, and the last\n3 name is L-A-W-A-L-L. For the Court's convenience, your Honor,\n4 she is the spouse of Aaron Mitchell, who practiced law, and her\n5 testimony was brought out, or her issue was raised during Amy\n6 Buck's testimony.\n7 THE COURT: Of course I will offer the defense an\n8 opportunity to address these issues at the close of the\n9 prosecution's case.\n10 MS. SHROFF: Thank you, your Honor.\n11 MR. FERGENSON: I'm happy to address Ms. Lawall, but\n12 we can also table it for later, if your Honor prefers that.\n13 THE COURT: I think it's a better idea.\n14 MR. FERGENSON: Okay. And just one update on the\n15 other issue Ms. Shroff raised. On the specific exhibits,\n16 actually, when I checked my email, the other AUSA had already\n17 sent them across, so that one's done.\n18 THE COURT: All righty. So we will have the witness\n19 back on the stand at 9:29 and get started at 9:30.\n20 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, we did receive the email at\n21 9:06 this morning. Thank you.\n22 (Recess)\n23 (At the sidebar)\n24 THE COURT: I just wanted to make clear that the\n25 government needs to specify all the individuals with respect to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 the Geaney application, and of course justify why those\n2 statements should be allowed in.\n3 MR. HORTON: Understood. Thank you, your Honor.\n4 MR. KAMARAJU: Thank you, your Honor.\n5 (In open court)\n6 THE COURT: Please have the jurors brought in.\n7 (Continued on next page)\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 (Jury present)\n2 THE COURT: Please be seated.\n3 Good morning, jurors.\n4 THE JURORS: Good morning.\n5 THE COURT: We're going to continue with the direct\n6 examination of the witness.\n7 Sir, remember that you're still under oath.\n8 You may continue the inquiry.\n9 MS. MURRAY: Thank you, your Honor.\n10 PAUL HINTON, resumed.\n11 DIRECT EXAMINATION\n12 BY MS. MURRAY:\n13 Q. Good morning, Mr. Hinton.\n14 A. Good morning.\n15 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, can we please put up\n16 Government Exhibit Z26 and go to slide 5.\n17 Q. Mr. Hinton, while we're waiting for this, can you explain\n18 to the jury what tracing is.\n19 A. Yes. Tracing, as I use the term, relates to following\n20 money through a series of accounts over time.\n21 Q. And how, if at all, do you trace funds through a series of\n22 accounts?\n23 A. Well, you look at the inflows into an account and the\n24 subsequent outflows from an account, and then if there are any\n25 outflows that go to another account, for example, via a wire\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 transfer, you then have to follow the money to that subsequent\n2 account, and then you do the same thing there.\n3 Q. How, if at all, did you use tracing of funds in the process\n4 of checking the accuracy of the information in these summary\n5 slides?\n6 A. Well, strictly, I wasn't asked to do any tracing.\n7 Q. Did you evaluate inflows and outflows in evaluating the\n8 accuracy of the information contained on these summary charts?\n9 A. Yes. For each trans——individual transaction, I was looking\n10 at the timing of the flows and the amounts of the flows and\n11 which accounts they went between.\n12 Q. And we talked a bit yesterday about the Sources of Funds\n13 that's contained within the summary charts. Do you recall\n14 that?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. And specifically how the government characterized Sources\n17 of Funds for purposes of G|CLUBS. What about GTV and Voice of\n18 Guo, or VOG; how did the government instruct Brattle to define\n19 source of funds for purposes of those accounts?\n20 A. For those accounts, we were simply identifying all of the\n21 flows for individuals who weren't otherwise identified as being\n22 associated with any of the entities that we talked about\n23 yesterday that were in the different categories that were shown\n24 on my charts.\n25 Q. And for the Farms, for Sources of Funds for purposes of the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Farms analysis, did the government provide Brattle with a list\n2 of entities or individuals who should be categorized as Sources\n3 of Funds for the Farms?\n4 A. Yes, there was a long series of entities that were\n5 associated with Farms, and those were shown on the chart as\n6 contributing funds through the Farms category on the chart.\n7 Q. And finally, the Himalaya Exchange. Did the government\n8 identify for you certain companies or bank accounts that were\n9 associated with incoming Sources of Funds for purposes of the\n10 summary of the Himalaya Exchange money?\n11 A. Yes. So again, in terms of the entities that are part of\n12 the Himalaya category, those were all defined, listed for us by\n13 the government, so we matched those against the transactions,\n14 and then anything that was——any of the Sources of Funds that\n15 flowed into those entities' accounts came from individuals who\n16 weren't otherwise associated with any of these classified\n17 entities.\n18 Q. And can you explain, again, as we're waiting, just a few of\n19 the other methods that you used to confirm the accuracy of the\n20 information contained on the charts as it's reflected in the\n21 source bank records that you reviewed.\n22 A. Yes. So ultimately, after the government determined which\n23 of the financial transactions and groups of transactions they\n24 wanted to appear on the charts, we used our database to\n25 identify what the underlying individual transactions were that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 would be summed up and displayed on the chart, and then for\n2 each of those transactions, we were able to look at the\n3 underlying Government Exhibit, which was a bank record that\n4 showed the amount of the transaction.\n5 Q. All right. We now have Government Exhibit Z26 up at slide\n6 5. What is the title of this slide, Mr. Hinton?\n7 A. This slide is titled GTV/VOG: Select Flows.\n8 Q. And looking at the first-level entities or first-level bank\n9 accounts, if I can call them that, from the Source of Funds\n10 into each of the first arrows, can you just read the entity\n11 names that the funds for GTV and VOG flowed to.\n12 A. Yes. So from Sources of Funds on the left-hand side, we\n13 see the first account is Voice of Guo Media, and it's a Bank of\n14 America account, 7226.\n15 The second account is also a Voice of Guo Media, Inc.\n16 account, this one at Wells Fargo bank, 5536.\n17 The third account is a Saraca Media Group, Inc.\n18 account at JPMorgan, 5601.\n19 The fourth account is a GTV Media Group, Inc. account\n20 at Capital One.\n21 And the fifth account is a GTV Media Group, Inc.\n22 account at JPMorgan, 3335.\n23 Q. And so of those five accounts, is it correct that they are\n24 held at four different banks?\n25 A. That's correct.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. Looking at the center arrow, down to the JPMorgan 5601\n2 Saraca Media account, how much money flowed through Sources of\n3 Funds into that account through June 4th of 2020?\n4 A. 275.9 million.\n5 Q. And then if we could look at the flows out of that account.\n6 Can you just read the amounts and the date ranges of when the\n7 money flowed out of that account.\n8 A. Yes. There were three flows out of that Saraca account\n9 that are shown on this chart to other entities.\n10 On the left, 125.5 million between June 3rd and\n11 June 10th is transferred to Saraca Media Group, Inc.'s JPMorgan\n12 account ending 2038.\n13 200 million is transferred on June 3rd to GTV Media\n14 Group's Citibank account 6691; and 10 million on May 13, 2020,\n15 to GTV Media Group, Inc. Capital One account ending 7000.\n16 Q. And Mr. Hinton, just to be clear, did these summary charts\n17 reflect all of the transactions that were contained within the\n18 bank records that the government provided you?\n19 A. No. It's only a selected number of the transactions.\n20 Q. And the bank records that you were provided, were those\n21 selected by the government?\n22 A. They were.\n23 Q. Did Brattle process only a portion of those bank records in\n24 the end and reflect those on these charts?\n25 A. That's correct. We identified a large number, and the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 government instructed us to——us to process a subset of those.\n2 Q. Can you describe the process by which the government\n3 discussed with Brattle which accounts to prioritize for\n4 purposes of processing.\n5 A. Yes. So initially they gave us this huge volume of\n6 documents and we had to identify which accounts were contained\n7 in those documents. We then generated a list of those\n8 accounts, showed them to the government, and the government\n9 instructed us which of those accounts were the highest priority\n10 and we should process.\n11 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, could we go to the next\n12 slide, please.\n13 Q. What's the title of this slide, Mr. Hinton?\n14 A. This slide is titled VOG: Select Flows.\n15 Q. Looking on the top left, there's a category called Other\n16 Inflows. What, if anything, does that represent?\n17 A. Well, that just shows all the flows into the Voice of Guo\n18 Media accounts that are listed there other than the\n19 26.7 million coming from Sources of Funds over the time period\n20 May 26, 2020, to June 6, 2020.\n21 Q. And there's an individual named on here, Lihong Wei\n22 Lafrenz. Do you know who that is?\n23 A. No.\n24 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, let's go to the\n25 next slide.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. If we could turn now to the Farms, Mr. Hinton.\n2 MS. MURRAY: If we could go to slide 8, please.\n3 Q. So looking here, there are kind of two categories on the\n4 top. There's Farms in green, and then there's Sources of Funds\n5 on the right in gray.\n6 First, the Farms category showing flows, does that\n7 capture the companies or individuals the government provided\n8 and identified to Brattle as associated with the Farms?\n9 A. Yes, that's correct. There's a list, a long list of those.\n10 Q. And what accounts does the 77 million go to from the Farms?\n11 A. It goes to an ACA Capital account at First Abu Dhabi Bank.\n12 Q. Where is First Abu Dhabi Bank located?\n13 A. In Abu Dhabi, I believe.\n14 Q. From your review of bank records the government provided,\n15 do you have an understanding of who, if anyone, controlled that\n16 ACA Capital account?\n17 A. No.\n18 MR. KAMARAJU: Objection.\n19 Q. If we could look now at the——\n20 THE COURT: The objection is overruled.\n21 Q. If we could look now at the flow of funds from the ACA\n22 Capital account. Let's start on the left.\n23 And if you could just read for the jury the amount and\n24 then the account holder or holders that the money went to.\n25 A. Yes. First, 19 million was transferred to Lexington\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Property & Staffing LLC in two accounts, DCB 0625 and Signature\n2 3545.\n3 Q. Sorry. Could you read the signature number again?\n4 A. Signature 3945. Sorry.\n5 Q. Thank you.\n6 A. The next transfer shown is 11.2 million transferred to\n7 William Je and Sing Ting Rong. And they're at three different\n8 bank accounts that received that money——two Barclays accounts\n9 and an HPB account.\n10 Q. And the next flow?\n11 A. The next flow is 18 million to Hudson Diamond.\n12 Q. Over what time period?\n13 A. From February 2, 2021, to February 10, 2021.\n14 Q. And where, ultimately, does 16 million go then from the\n15 Hudson Diamond's holding account?\n16 A. Yes, in May through June, 16 million from the Hudson\n17 Diamond account is transferred to Lamp Capital LLC.\n18 Q. And just to be clear about the date ranges of that\n19 $16 million collective transaction, what was the date range for\n20 that flow?\n21 A. May 28, '21, through July 30, 2021.\n22 Q. All right. Continuing from the ACA Capital account, we\n23 just did to Hudson Diamond. What's the next flow represented\n24 on the summary?\n25 A. Well, there's a $13 million transfer from ACA Capital\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 directly to the Lamp Capital accounts.\n2 Q. And then finally——well, not finally, but the next one going\n3 to the right.\n4 A. Yes, the next one is 5 million going to Greenwich Land LLC.\n5 Q. And then the last flow that we see going kind of 3:00.\n6 A. Is 32 million to Savio Law.\n7 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, I'd like to pull up\n8 Government Exhibit GX PNC39 at page 3, please.\n9 Q. Focusing on that last transaction that you just mentioned,\n10 or the last flow you just mentioned, Mr. Hinton, the 32 million\n11 to Savio Law.\n12 MS. MURRAY: All right. And if we could go to page 3,\n13 please. Actually——sorry——let's go to the top of the page,\n14 Ms. Loftus.\n15 Q. Mr. Hinton, is this one of the bank records that you were\n16 provided by the government in this case?\n17 A. It is.\n18 Q. Is this one of the records that you reviewed to confirm the\n19 accuracy of the charts we've been talking about, including Z26?\n20 A. It is.\n21 Q. Looking at the top left, what is listed in the bold and\n22 then, underneath that, on the very top left?\n23 A. It says IOLTA, IOLTA Checking.\n24 Q. And beneath that?\n25 A. PNC Bank.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. What is the time period for this particular bank statement?\n2 A. October 31, 2020, through November 30, 2020.\n3 Q. And then beneath that, can you read the entity name and the\n4 address associated with this account.\n5 A. Savio Law at 3 Dale Court, Hazlet, New Jersey.\n6 Q. Under Savio Law LLC, there's a description. Can you read\n7 that to the jury, please.\n8 A. IOLTA Attorney Trust Account.\n9 Q. Do you have any independent knowledge of whether Savio Law\n10 LLC is a law firm?\n11 A. No.\n12 Q. And looking on the right, what are the last four of the\n13 account number we're looking at here?\n14 A. 8162.\n15 MS. MURRAY: All right. We can now go to page 3,\n16 Ms. Loftus.\n17 And let's focus on Activity Details, Deposits and\n18 Other Additions.\n19 Q. Mr. Hinton, do you see the transactions that are listed\n20 here for Deposits and Other Additions in this account?\n21 A. I do.\n22 Q. What are the date ranges of the top four transactions?\n23 A. From November 12th to November 16th.\n24 Q. And what are the amounts of each, just from the top down?\n25 A. Yes. 9.5 million, 8.5 million, 7.5 million, and 6,499,935.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. Mr. Hinton, did those four transactions collectively\n2 represent the 32 million that we just looked at in the flow\n3 from ACA Capital to Savio Law?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, we can go back to Z26,\n6 please.\n7 And we were at page 8.\n8 Q. All right. So this is the broader summary of the Farm\n9 flows, Mr. Hinton. I'd like to now go and drill down on a few\n10 of the different flows.\n11 MS. MURRAY: If we could go to the next page, please,\n12 Ms. Loftus.\n13 Q. Looking beneath Savio Law and ACA Capital and what's now\n14 the blank space——if we can go to the next slide,\n15 please——Mr. Hinton, what are the two flows that are reflected\n16 here that occurred on October 15, 2020?\n17 A. There's a $5 million transfer to Greenwich Land LLC and\n18 there's a $5 million transfer to Lamp Capital.\n19 Q. And at which bank were the accounts held that received\n20 those $5 million transfers on October 15, 2020?\n21 A. Bank of Princeton.\n22 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, let's go to the\n23 next slide now, please.\n24 Q. And then what do we see reflected here, Mr. Hinton, from\n25 ACA Capital to Greenwich Land and then the flow out to the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 right?\n2 A. Right. So in October, between October 21st and 23rd, 2020,\n3 $5 million was transferred from ACA Capital to Greenwich Land,\n4 then subsequently on October——between October 26 and\n5 November 20, 2020, 9 million was transferred from Greenwich\n6 Land to Lamp Capital.\n7 MS. MURRAY: All right. Let's go to the next slide,\n8 please, Ms. Loftus.\n9 Q. This is another portion of the broader Farms chart that we\n10 were just looking at, Mr. Hinton. Can you just explain,\n11 generally, starting with Farms and going down to the account\n12 that's highlighted in yellow, what type of flows we're looking\n13 at here in this summary.\n14 A. Yes. This is just showing those flows from the previous\n15 chart that went from Farms, 77 million transferred to ACA\n16 Capital and then two transfers or transfers from ACA Capital to\n17 two different entities, Hudson Diamond receiving 18 million and\n18 Lamp Capital receiving 13 million from ACA Capital, and of\n19 the——there's also a subsequent transfer from Hudson Diamond\n20 Holding of 16 million into Lamp Capital.\n21 Q. And just to make sure that we're reading this correctly, so\n22 the Farms, 77 million to ACA Capital, ultimately, does\n23 $29 million go into the Lamp Capital LLC account, as\n24 represented in these transactions?\n25 A. Yes, ultimately, the account that received the $77 million\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 from Farms subsequently transferred money to Lamp Capital with\n2 13 million and 18 to Hudson; Hudson Diamond then subsequently\n3 transferred 16 million to Lamp Capital; so together, there's\n4 29 million coming into Lamp Capital.\n5 MS. MURRAY: And let's go the next slide, please,\n6 Ms. Loftus.\n7 Q. On this slide, Mr. Hinton, we're starting with what was the\n8 terminus of the last slide, the Lamp Capital account; is that\n9 correct?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. And what is the title of this slide?\n12 A. It's Farms: Select Expenses from Lamp Capital Accounts.\n13 Q. Mr. Hinton, does this slide reflect just a subset of\n14 outflows from the Lamp Capital Signature Bank account?\n15 A. It does.\n16 Q. And who selected which transactions to reflect on this\n17 slide?\n18 A. The government.\n19 Q. I want to look at some of the records underlying these\n20 transactions. But first, Mr. Hinton, if you could just read\n21 the categories that are shown in the bubbles starting from left\n22 to right for the flows here.\n23 A. Yes. The select expenses include car-related expenses,\n24 Yachtzoo LLC expenses, ACASS Canada Ltd., Cirrus Design\n25 Corporation, Mei Guo, and Qiang Guo.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, let's go to\n2 Government Exhibit SIG102 and go to page 4.\n3 Q. I want to look at one of the car-related expenses that was\n4 reflected on the slide we just looked at, slide 13.\n5 Actually, focusing on the first page——thank you,\n6 Ms. Loftus——just looking at the statement itself, what is the\n7 statement period we're looking at here, Mr. Hinton?\n8 A. The statement period is May 1st through 31st——\n9 Q. And what year?\n10 A. ——2021.\n11 Q. Sorry. I spoke over you. What year?\n12 A. 2021.\n13 Q. And is this one of the bank records the government provided\n14 to you which you reviewed in connection with checking the\n15 accuracy of the summary charts?\n16 A. It is.\n17 Q. Looking on the left, what is the name and the address for\n18 this particular bank account?\n19 A. It's Lamp Capital LLC, at 667 Madison Avenue, New York, New\n20 York.\n21 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, let's zoom out of\n22 that and go to page 4, please.\n23 Thank you. And if we could highlight the May 27th,\n24 the larger entry here.\n25 Q. Mr. Hinton, do you see that, that transaction as reflected\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 in this bank record?\n2 A. I do.\n3 Q. Looking at that, what type of transaction is reflected\n4 here, for May 27, 2021, from this Lamp Capital account?\n5 A. It's an outgoing wire.\n6 Q. And two lines down, to whom was that outgoing wire sent?\n7 A. The wire transfer was made to Wells Fargo bank account\n8 8296, which was for the benefit of Miller Motorcars, Inc.\n9 Q. What was the dollar amount of that outgoing wire to Miller\n10 Motorcars from Lamp Capital?\n11 A. It was $294,306.\n12 MS. MURRAY: Skipping around on the expenses, if we\n13 could look on the same page, Ms. Loftus, the second entry,\n14 May 19 of 2021.\n15 Q. What type of transaction is reflected here, Mr. Hinton?\n16 A. This is also an outgoing wire transfer.\n17 Q. And looking two lines down, to whom was this outgoing wire\n18 sent?\n19 A. It was sent to Mei Guo.\n20 Q. What was the dollar amount of this outgoing wire from Lamp\n21 Capital to Mei Guo on May 19, 2021?\n22 A. It was $500,000.\n23 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, let's go now,\n24 please, to Z26 again at slide 13.\n25 Q. I just want to look back at where we see the transactions\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 we just saw reflected on this chart.\n2 So Mr. Hinton, the Miller Motorcars, where, if\n3 anywhere, on this summary chart is that sum included?\n4 A. It's in the red-lined bubble that's titled Car-Related\n5 Expenses.\n6 Q. And the $500,000 to Mei Guo, where, if anywhere on this\n7 summary slide, is that transaction reflected?\n8 A. That's the second line from the right with the——the\n9 lavender-colored bubble at the bottom.\n10 Q. All right. We're going to look now, Mr. Hinton, at one of\n11 the records for ACASS Canada Ltd., which is the third arrow\n12 flow on this chart.\n13 MR. HORTON: If we could please go to Government\n14 Exhibit NJ808, page 2.\n15 Q. And just to clarify, not looking at one of the bank records\n16 but looking at one of the government exhibits relating to that\n17 particular flow. Mr. Hinton, do you know what kind of company\n18 ACASS Canada Ltd. is?\n19 A. No.\n20 Q. So this is a Government Exhibit titled NJ808. Have you\n21 seen this before?\n22 A. I don't recall.\n23 Q. Focusing on the top——Ms. Loftus, if we could zoom in——the\n24 Company Name/Service Provider listed here, could you read that\n25 for us, please, Mr. Hinton.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 MS. MURRAY: If we're able to zoom in on that, please,\n2 Ms. Loftus.\n3 Q. So it's under Company Name entry there, the first line, the\n4 first long line.\n5 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, can you highlight that,\n6 please.\n7 A. Yes, so it says Company Name, ACASS Canada Ltd., and then\n8 afterwards, it has in quotes Service Provider, so I believe the\n9 service provider you're referring to is ACASS Canada Ltd.\n10 MS. MURRAY: And let's zoom out of that, please,\n11 Ms. Loftus, and let's look further down the page.\n12 Q. Focusing now on the bottom, just the \"Agreed by\" through to\n13 the right side.\n14 Mr. Hinton, looking here, \"Agreed by Service\n15 Provider,\" what is in that field on this document?\n16 A. It's ACASS Canada Ltd.\n17 Q. And who is listed on the right as the customer?\n18 A. \"Agreed to by customer Whitecroft Shore Ltd.,\" and then\n19 there's a signature and a printed name.\n20 Q. What is the printed name?\n21 A. The printed name is Mei Guo.\n22 MS. MURRAY: All right. Let's zoom out of that,\n23 please, Ms. Loftus.\n24 And if we could focus again just on the very top\n25 paragraph, \"In accordance with.\"\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. Mr. Hinton, looking at this portion of this document, can\n2 you just read the first sentence through to the first comma.\n3 A. Yes. \"In accordance with paragraph C6 of the CorporateCare\n4 Terms as incorporated in an Aircraft Enrollment Contract, the\n5 customer, Whitecroft Shore Limited, hereby authorizes,\" etc.\n6 Q. And in this text, what type of contract is referenced?\n7 A. It's an Aircraft Enrollment Contract.\n8 Q. Thank you.\n9 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, let's take that down now and\n10 go to Government Exhibit VK10 at page 58.\n11 It's VK10 at page 58. Oh, sorry. UK, UK10.\n12 If we could look at the top of this, please.\n13 Q. Mr. Hinton, have you seen this document before?\n14 A. I don't recall whether I've reviewed this one individually.\n15 Q. What is the title on this page of Government Exhibit UK10?\n16 A. It's Initial Deposit Wire Transfer.\n17 Q. Who is listed as the customer on this document?\n18 A. Mileson Guo.\n19 Q. And the account name a few lines down?\n20 A. Is Wells Fargo Bank.\n21 Q. Oh, not the bank name——sorry——the account name, a couple of\n22 lines down.\n23 A. Oh, I'm sorry. Cirrus Design Corporation is the account.\n24 Q. A few lines further down from that, there's a deposit\n25 amount in USD. Do you see that?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 A. I do.\n2 Q. What is that amount?\n3 A. It's $95,000.\n4 MS. MURRAY: Could we zoom out of it, Ms. Loftus, so\n5 we can see more of this page.\n6 And let's go to the next page, please.\n7 Q. Mr. Hinton, what's the title of this page of Government\n8 Exhibit UK10? This is page 59.\n9 A. This page is titled Second Deposit Wire Transfer.\n10 Q. And the customer name here?\n11 A. Mileson Guo.\n12 Q. Again, a few lines down, the account name for this second\n13 deposit wire transfer?\n14 A. The——the account name is Cirrus Design Corporation.\n15 Q. And a few lines below that, deposit amount in U.S. dollars?\n16 A. It's 206,700.\n17 Q. And the next line on this document, what is the field and\n18 then what is the information in that field?\n19 A. Yes. It says, \"Aircraft Reference: Vision SF50 G2\n20 Position.\"\n21 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, let's go again to\n22 Z26, page 13, just to see where the transactions we just\n23 reviewed are reflected.\n24 Q. So here, Mr. Hinton, can you explain to the jury where we\n25 see those two entities we just looked at, ACASS and Cirrus\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Design.\n2 A. They are the black ovals that are towards the bottom middle\n3 of the chart.\n4 Q. And finally, I'd like to look at the 20 million on the\n5 right side of this chart that goes to Qiang Guo. And do you\n6 know who that individual is, Mr. Hinton?\n7 A. I do not.\n8 Q. All right. What is the date range of that $20 million\n9 collective transfer?\n10 A. It's May 18, '21, through June 1st——\n11 Q. Of what year?\n12 A. ——of 2021.\n13 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, let's go to\n14 Government Exhibit 3200, please.\n15 Q. Focusing first on the top of this document, Mr. Hinton, is\n16 this one of the bank records that you reviewed in connection\n17 with your work verifying the summary charts?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. At the top, what is the date for this account statement?\n20 A. It is December 14, 2021.\n21 Q. And looking on the right, there are three letters on the\n22 top right. Do you see those?\n23 A. I do.\n24 Q. What do those reflect?\n25 A. CHF I believe refers to Swiss francs.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. And the name beneath that?\n2 A. Qiang Guo.\n3 MS. MURRAY: Let's go to the next page, please,\n4 Ms. Loftus. Oh, actually, let's stay here for a moment.\n5 Q. Mr. Hinton, the first line on this account statement, what\n6 was the balance of this account as of July 31, 2020?\n7 A. It indicates a 0 balance on that date.\n8 MS. MURRAY: All right. Let's go to the next slide,\n9 please.\n10 And the next slide. Excuse me.\n11 Q. Looking here, Mr. Hinton, again, the top line, the balance\n12 brought forward as of July 31, 2020, what is that amount as\n13 reflected here?\n14 A. It's a 0 balance.\n15 Q. Can you read the next entry on this bank statement,\n16 starting with the date.\n17 A. On May 19, 2021, there's a credit transaction that's\n18 referred to as bonification from Lamp Capital LLC for 7 million\n19 U.S. dollars.\n20 Q. And how do you know that that's denominated in U.S.\n21 dollars, based on this bank record?\n22 A. Well, this particular page of the statement has USD at the\n23 top right.\n24 MS. MURRAY: And Ms. Loftus, let's go to the next\n25 slide, please.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. Focusing on the third line on this page of the bank\n2 statement, what is the date of that transaction? And can you\n3 explain the details.\n4 A. The date of that transaction is the 2nd of June and——2021,\n5 and it's a $13 million credit from bonification——it says\n6 bonification from Lamp Capital. So it's——my understanding is\n7 that's a transfer to this account from Lamp Capital of\n8 $13 million.\n9 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, go back to Z26,\n10 slide 13.\n11 Q. Mr. Hinton, those two transactions we just looked at, the\n12 7 million and the 13 million, are those collectively the\n13 20 million reflected on the right side flow on this summary\n14 chart?\n15 A. They are.\n16 MS. MURRAY: Go to the next slide.\n17 Q. I'd like to talk through G|CLUBS and Crane a bit.\n18 First of all, Mr. Hinton, who determined that Crane\n19 accounts were associated with the G|CLUBS category for purposes\n20 of these summaries?\n21 A. The government.\n22 Q. Do you have any independent knowledge of what Crane is?\n23 A. I do not.\n24 Q. All right. Looking at this, there's a lot going on, so\n25 we're going to break it down a little bit.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Does this show the flow of certain Sources of Funds\n2 that were within the category of G|CLUBS and Crane that the\n3 government identified?\n4 A. Yes, certain selected funds and certain selected accounts,\n5 yes.\n6 Q. And does this slide reflect just a subset of the flows that\n7 went to and through the various G Club and Crane accounts?\n8 A. Yes, it's just a subset.\n9 Q. Let's look at a couple of the transactions that are\n10 reflected here.\n11 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if we could go——\n12 Q. Well, first of all, Mr. Hinton, can you just explain the\n13 color scheme that we have going on here a bit so the jury\n14 understands what those colors reflect.\n15 A. Yes. The idea here is to use the same color for all the\n16 different accounts for the same entity or groups of entities.\n17 So the G|CLUBS entities are shown in dark blue, the Crane\n18 entities are shown in light blue, and the Hamilton and Himalaya\n19 entities are shown in yellow.\n20 Q. And up on the top right there is an inflow from Farms to\n21 Crane Advisory. What color is reflected for Farms?\n22 A. Yes, we're consistently using green to indicate Farms\n23 entities.\n24 Q. All right. So let's break this down a little bit.\n25 MS. MURRAY: If we could go to the next slide, please,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 Ms. Loftus.\n2 Q. Focusing now, Mr. Hinton, on the G|CLUBS portion of this\n3 summary of selected flows, can you just narrate us a bit\n4 through the various flows that end up in the G Club Operations\n5 Morgan Stanley account, the three accounts listed here.\n6 A. Yes. Between February 3, 2021, and July 9, 2021,\n7 $8.6 million was transferred to those Morgan Stanley G Club\n8 accounts that are listed in the box there from Sources of\n9 Funds.\n10 Q. And in looking at the other inflows into those Morgan\n11 Stanley accounts, as reflected here, just at a high level,\n12 where do we see the money coming from and into those Morgan\n13 Stanley accounts?\n14 A. They're coming from other G Club Operations accounts at two\n15 different banks.\n16 Q. Starting on the left, can you read kind of the left bottom\n17 from the Signature account going around clockwise.\n18 A. Certainly. So there's a G|CLUBS Operations LLC account at\n19 Signature Bank, 3576, and that account transferred 14.5 million\n20 on January 11, 2021, to the Morgan Stanley G Club Operations\n21 account.\n22 Then next in the rotation, there's a G|CLUBS\n23 Operations account at——I think it's First Bank, 7085, and\n24 there's a $52.2 million transfer on December 17, 2020, to the\n25 Morgan Stanley G Club Operations accounts.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 And finally, there's a separate First Bank account for\n2 G Club Operations ending 7052. The transfer is a hundred\n3 thousand, on December 29, 2020.\n4 Q. And Mr. Hinton, each of those three transfers that you just\n5 discussed had a single date associated with them; is that\n6 correct?\n7 A. That's correct.\n8 Q. Was each of those an individual transaction into the\n9 G|CLUBS Morgan Stanley account?\n10 A. I believe so, but that's based on my——my memory.\n11 Q. And then looking from the Morgan Stanley accounts, what are\n12 the two outgoing flows that are reflected on this summary\n13 chart?\n14 A. Yes, there's a $10 million collection of outflows on\n15 January 21, 2021, through February 4, 2021, to Fiesta Property\n16 Developments Limited, and there's a series of transfers to a\n17 G|CLUBS International account at Mercantile Bank that summed to\n18 62.7 million over the period August 20, '21 through October 8,\n19 2021.\n20 Q. Mr. Hinton, do you know what Fiesta Property Developments\n21 Limited is?\n22 A. I do not.\n23 MS. MURRAY: All right. Let's go to the next slide,\n24 Ms. Loftus.\n25 Q. I'd like to focus now on the Crane portion of the select\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO1 Hinton - Direct\n1 flows reflected here.\n2 We're not going to go through this in every\n3 transaction detail, Mr. Hinton, but just starting with the\n4 arrow straight down from Sources of Funds to the Citi account,\n5 5278, what amount is represented there?\n6 A. 59.5 million.\n7 Q. And over what time period?\n8 A. November 23, 2020, through April 1, 2021.\n9 Q. And then following that arrow straight down, what is the\n10 next flow that's reflected here from that Citi account?\n11 A. Yes, that same Citi account for Crane Advisory Group at\n12 Citibank transfers 58.2 million to Crane Advisory Group at\n13 Morgan Stanley.\n14 Q. And I want to focus just briefly on the Crane Advisory\n15 Group account on the far right, the Capital One 0887 account.\n16 Do you see that?\n17 A. I do.\n18 (Continued on next page)\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 BY MS. MURRAY:\n2 Q. There are both inflows and outflows for that account; is\n3 that correct?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Looking at other inflows above which is going down the 25.3\n6 million, what types of transactions does that reflect on this\n7 chart?\n8 A. Those are all the transactions over that time period that\n9 aren't coming from the other entities the explicitly listed on\n10 the chart.\n11 Q. And then there's an outflow or outflows over a time period,\n12 the $42 million, which accounts and over what time period does\n13 that money flow from Capital One?\n14 A. Between May 28 and July 13, 2021.\n15 Q. And that goes to Crane Advisory accounts held at what bank?\n16 A. At Morgan Stanley.\n17 MS. MURRAY: Let's go to the next slide please,\n18 Ms. Loftus, and marry those two, the G/Club and the Crane.\n19 Q. Looking at this, this now brings those together, and in\n20 particular there's a flow just to the left of the middle of the\n21 page from Crane Advisory Group's Morgan Stanley accounts to the\n22 G/Club Morgan Stanley accounts, if would highlight that,\n23 Ms. Loftus.\n24 What is the dollar amount of that collective transfer\n25 from Crane to G/Club?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 A. The aggregate amount of the transfers between the Morgan\n2 Stanley accounts for Crane Advisory and the Morgan Stanley\n3 accounts for G/Club Operations over that period is 87.1\n4 million.\n5 Q. What is the period for that 87.1 million transfer?\n6 A. It's a series of transfers over the period May 24, 2021\n7 through July 2nd, 2021.\n8 Q. Ms. Loftus, let's go to the next slide and build in the\n9 Himalaya Exchange entities.\n10 Mr. Hinton, now looking at the accounts we just ended\n11 with, the G/Club Morgan Stanley accounts, what is the outflow\n12 reflected here over the period of May 6, 2021 to June 23, 2021?\n13 A. $85 million.\n14 Q. If you could highlight that for the jury, please,\n15 Ms. Loftus, on the left from G/Club to Hamilton.\n16 And then looking from that Hamilton Digital Assets\n17 account we see another flow in the amount of $85 million. Is\n18 that right?\n19 A. That is correct.\n20 Q. What is the period of time for that agregation of flows?\n21 A. From September 1, 2021 through September 16.\n22 Q. And that goes to a bank account held in what name?\n23 A. Hamilton Opportunity Fund.\n24 Q. At what bank?\n25 A. At Silvergate Bank, 9306.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. Focusing now on that Silvergate account, the Hamilton\n2 Opportunity Fund, there's also another incoming flow above from\n3 a Himalaya International Clearing entity. Do you see that?\n4 A. I do.\n5 Q. What is the dollar amount of that?\n6 A. It's $25 million.\n7 Q. Let's build in the next slide, please, Ms. Loftus.\n8 Looking on the right now, Mr. Hinton, we're looking in\n9 the September and October 2021 time period with a series of\n10 flows to Lawall & Mitchell, LLC account. Do you see that?\n11 A. I do.\n12 Q. Can you read the dollar amounts and the dates of the\n13 inflows into that account from the various Crane accounts as\n14 reflected on this chart?\n15 A. The Morgan Stanley account sends 6.8 million on October 19.\n16 The IDB bank account send 1.6 million on the 27th of September.\n17 The Signature Bank account sends 2.3 million between September\n18 27th and October 12, 2021, and the Crane Advisory account at\n19 Capital One sends 37 million on September 26, 2021.\n20 Q. Let's go to the next slide. I want to continue along in\n21 our chronology here on this summary.\n22 So we're looking again in the middle of the page\n23 Hamilton Opportunity Silvergate account. There's now an\n24 outgoing flow from that account on October 27, 2021. Do you\n25 see that?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 A. I do.\n2 Q. What is the dollar amount of that flow?\n3 A. 59 million.\n4 Q. And that goes from a Hamilton Opportunity Fund account held\n5 at what bank to a Hamilton Opportunity account held at what\n6 bank?\n7 A. This transfer between two Silvergate accounts for the same\n8 entity, Hamilton Opportunity Fund, so it had a 9306 account\n9 that transferred to the 7747 account.\n10 Q. Let's go to the next slide please, Ms. Loftus.\n11 What do we see here?\n12 A. We see the same amount being transferred on the same day\n13 from the Silvergate 7747 account to a third Hamilton\n14 Opportunity Fund account at Silvergate numbered 7739.\n15 Q. And those $59 million transfers from Hamilton Opportunity\n16 Fund accounts, those transfers are on the same day among\n17 different accounts; is that correct?\n18 A. That's right.\n19 Q. Let's go to the next slide, please.\n20 So there's now an account at the bottom of this slide\n21 listed as Silvergate 7713. Do you see that?\n22 A. I do.\n23 Q. In what entity name is that account held?\n24 A. That's also Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC.\n25 Q. And let's look at the inflows then into that account from\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 both the Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC 7721 Silvergate account\n2 on the left, and the Hamilton Opportunity Fund SPC 7739\n3 Silvergate account on the right?\n4 A. Yes. There's 5.6 million transferred on November 15, 2021\n5 from the Silvergate 7721 to the Silvergate 7713 accounts.\n6 Q. And then looking on right, the incoming transfer to 7713\n7 from 7739?\n8 A. Yes, that's 46.5 million on December 2, 2021.\n9 Q. Let's go to the next slide, please, Ms. Loftus.\n10 Mr. Hinton, this is now again a subset of the broader\n11 G/Club/Crane summary chart we've been looking at. As you can\n12 see, there's a highlight on this G/Club International Limited\n13 account at Mercantile Bank. Do you see that?\n14 A. I do.\n15 Q. And the inflows reflected on this chart into that account,\n16 what is the amount from the G/Club Operations Morgan Stanley\n17 account?\n18 A. 62.7 million.\n19 Q. Let's go to the next slide, please.\n20 What is the title of this slide, Mr. Hinton?\n21 A. G/Club select flows and expenses.\n22 Q. Here looking at the top, are we starting with this summary\n23 flow analysis from the account we just saw on the prior slide\n24 that the 62.7 million came into?\n25 A. We are.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. Focusing on a few of the outflows that are reflected here.\n2 Let's start on the right with the blue.\n3 What is shown with the outflows on the right to Yacht\n4 Zoo, LLC?\n5 A. It shows that between October 26, 2021 and September 1,\n6 2022, $478,000 was transferred.\n7 Q. Then looking to the red, what category of transactions is\n8 reflected in the summary chart here?\n9 A. The red symbols are associated with car-related expenses.\n10 Q. What is the dollar amount for those collective car-related\n11 expenses?\n12 A. 6.4 million.\n13 Q. The prior car-related expenses that we looked at\n14 Mr. Hinton, those were expenses that originated from a\n15 different bank account; is that correct?\n16 A. That's correct.\n17 Q. The Lamp Capital account?\n18 A. That's correct.\n19 Q. And these are expenses from an account held in what\n20 entity's name?\n21 A. G/Club International Limited.\n22 Q. Continuing on there's an entry called Stone Offer Design.\n23 Do you see that?\n24 A. I do.\n25 Q. From what accounts do we see transactions flowing into\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 Stone Offer design?\n2 A. We see payments from both the G/Club International\n3 Mercantile account and from G/Clubs Operations in a separate TD\n4 Bank account.\n5 Q. Looking left, Mr. Hinton, there is a sources of funds\n6 section over on the top left, and that flows into both the\n7 G/Club Operations account and the Himalaya International\n8 Clearing account. Do you see that?\n9 A. I do.\n10 Q. Does the money that's reflected in the sources of funds,\n11 does that include incoming sources of funds that the government\n12 identified for Brattle?\n13 A. Yes, these are sources of funds coming from entities that\n14 we previously described how the government instructed us to\n15 identify.\n16 Q. And based on the information on this slide, does that\n17 include sources of funds for both Himalaya Exchange, which\n18 would be shown in the flow to Himalaya International Clearing\n19 and for G/Clubs which is shown in the flow to G/Club\n20 Operations?\n21 A. It does.\n22 Q. Let's focus on the far left side of this. We have a flow\n23 into G/Club Operations, where then do we see $7 million going\n24 between March 2, 2022 and April 12, 2022?\n25 A. There are aggregate transfers to -- I'm not sure how to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 pronounce the name of the swiss bank, but it's right there.\n2 Q. I represent to you that it's Kyrgyz swiss bank.\n3 A. Thank you.\n4 Q. Let's look at those transactions from the bank records.\n5 Ms. Loftus if we could go to Government Exhibit TDB-93. We'll\n6 start on the first page, Ms. Loftus.\n7 Mr. Hinton, is this one of the bank records that you\n8 reviewed in connection with your work in this case?\n9 A. It is.\n10 Q. What's the statement period for this record?\n11 A. It's January 14, 2022 through January 31st of the same\n12 year.\n13 Q. And what is the entity name and the address that this\n14 account is held in?\n15 A. It's G/Club Operations, LLC, 162 East 64th Street, New\n16 York, New York.\n17 Q. And the last four of the primary account number on the\n18 right side?\n19 A. 2044.\n20 Q. On the account summary here, what's the beginning balance\n21 in this account on this statement period?\n22 A. It has a zero beginning balance.\n23 Q. Let's go to page eight, please, Ms. Loftus and scroll down.\n24 On the other withdrawals, Mr. Hinton, can you read\n25 that first withdrawal, March 2?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 A. Yes. March 2nd, there's a ware transfer outgoing to Kyrgyz\n2 swiss bank 3 million.\n3 Q. And then let's go to page 12, please, Ms. Loftus. And\n4 scroll down to the other withdrawal section there.\n5 On the first entry for April 12 here, Mr. Hinton, do\n6 you see that?\n7 A. Yeah, this is a similarly titled wire transfer outgoing for\n8 $4 million.\n9 Q. And what bank does that go to?\n10 A. It's going to Kyrgyz swiss bank.\n11 Q. So those two transactions the 3 million and the 4 million,\n12 do those collectively represent the $7 million that we saw in\n13 the flow on the summary chart at Z26 page 25?\n14 A. They do.\n15 Q. Ms. Loftus, let's go back to Z26. Let's go to slide 26. I\n16 want to talk through now at a high level about some of the\n17 Himalaya exchange flows.\n18 Mr. Hinton, starting on the left top here, sources of\n19 funds. Again, do the sources of funds reflected on the\n20 Himalaya Exchange flow summary, are those the same category of\n21 funds that we discussed earlier?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. So the left most line, just taking us straight down the\n24 line, if you could just read the dollar amount and the date\n25 ranges and what accounts that monies flows through?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 A. Yes. 473.8 million is the aggregate amount of transfers\n2 from sources of funds to Himalaya International Clearing FEV\n3 3763 account between June 2, 2021 and June 30, 2022.\n4 Q. And then from that FV Bank international clearing account,\n5 what do we see reflected inflows between March 21st and May\n6 13th of 2022?\n7 A. 80 million in aggregate transfers to a different Himalaya\n8 International Clearing Limited account at the same bank, but\n9 this account ends in 2119.\n10 Q. And then from there what is the next flow reflected here?\n11 A. Yes. Then from March 5, 2022 through May 13, 2022, there's\n12 30 million flowing to a Mercantile account for Himalaya\n13 International Financial Group limited.\n14 Q. And looking kind of in the middle of the slide, Mr. Hinton,\n15 there's another Himalaya International Clearing account. Do\n16 you see that, it's 0133?\n17 A. I do.\n18 Q. At what bank is that held?\n19 A. That's also at Mercantile Bank.\n20 Q. How much money flows into that account as reflected here\n21 from both Clearing at FV Bank 3763 and from sources of fund?\n22 A. There's 220 million in aggregate coming from FV Bank\n23 Himalaya International Clearing Limited and 36.9 coming from\n24 sources of funds, so together that's 256.9 million.\n25 Q. And then there's another inflow reflected here going to the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 clearing account at Mercantile Bank, that's from the right\n2 side, what is that amount, and what account does that come from\n3 or what entity?\n4 A. Yes. That's a $50 million transfer on December 2, 2021\n5 from G/Club International Limited.\n6 Q. So that's $50 million from G/Club International to Himalaya\n7 International Clearing; is that right?\n8 A. That's right.\n9 Q. And then looking at the outflow from the Himalaya\n10 International Clearing at Mercantile to Hamilton Opportunity\n11 Fund, what is the aggregate dollar amount of that outflow?\n12 A. 51 million.\n13 Q. And what is the Hamilton Opportunity Fund bank account that\n14 that money goes to?\n15 A. It's a Silvergate account ending 7739.\n16 Q. Let's go to the next slide, please, Ms. Loftus.\n17 I want to focus on the bottom flow that's reflected\n18 here, Mr. Hinton. From that Himalaya International Financial\n19 Group Mercantile account we discussed, the 0139, what flow did\n20 we see on April 15, 2022?\n21 A. We see a $37 million transfer to Zeisler & Zeisler, PC,\n22 IOLTA account.\n23 Q. Do you know what Zeisler & Zeisler PC is?\n24 A. I understand it's a law firm.\n25 Q. Do you know what role, if any, Zeisler & Zeisler has in the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 government's case?\n2 A. I do not.\n3 Q. Let's go to the next slide. Focusing on just one of the\n4 categories of expenses that we had discussed in connection with\n5 some of the transactions from the various accounts.\n6 On the next slide, Ms. Loftus. Mr. Hinton, what is\n7 the title of this slide?\n8 A. This slide is titled Yacht Zoo, LLC expenses summary.\n9 Q. What is at the top of this slide?\n10 A. It's an oval representing Yacht Zoo, LLC.\n11 Q. Going from left to the right counter clockwise, does this\n12 represent various different inflows to Yacht Zoo, LLC from\n13 different accounts we've been discussing?\n14 A. Yes. They're essentially expenses of those accounts,\n15 monies that are being transferred to Yacht Zoo, LLCs account.\n16 Q. What is the aggregate amount of money just from the bank\n17 transactions reflected on this summary chart that goes to Yacht\n18 Zoo, LLC between May 7, 2020 and October 21, 2022? In the\n19 middle there, Ms. Loftus.\n20 A. Yes, it's 3.9 million.\n21 Q. And so starting on the left with the Lamp Capital Signature\n22 account, what's the date range of that 1.8 million aggregate\n23 flows?\n24 A. 1.8 million.\n25 Q. What's the date range?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 A. It's May 7, 2021 through September 13, 2021.\n2 Q. And the next account, the IDB account held in the name of\n3 Lamp Capital, what's the date range for those Yacht Zoo, LLC\n4 payments?\n5 A. October 25 through December 20, 2021.\n6 Q. And in the middle there, Lamp Capital, LLC, DCB or Dime\n7 Community Bank, what is the dollar amount that goes up to Yacht\n8 Zoo from that account?\n9 A. $990,000.\n10 Q. Continuing right, HCHK Tech, what is the date of the\n11 transfers to Yacht Zoo from that account?\n12 A. October 21, 2022.\n13 Q. By the way, you see money going from G/Club as well to\n14 Yacht Zoo, what is the dollar amount of that collection of\n15 transactions?\n16 A. 478,000.\n17 Q. Let's just take a look at one of those for the HCHK Tech\n18 transfer to Yacht Zoo, LLC. Ms. Loftus, if you could pull up\n19 Government Exhibit MTB-83. Let's focus on the top first.\n20 What is the last four of the account number looking on\n21 the right here?\n22 A. The account number ends in 2176.\n23 Q. And the statement period for this particular bank record?\n24 A. October 1 through October 31, 2022.\n25 Q. What is the name and address for this particular bank\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 account?\n2 A. It's HCHK Technologies, Inc, 750 Lexington Avenue, New\n3 York, New York.\n4 Q. Let's zoom out, Ms. Loftus, and look down the page a bit.\n5 If we could look at the second entry for October 21, 2022.\n6 Do you see that, Mr. Hinton?\n7 A. I do.\n8 Q. What is the description of that transaction as reflected in\n9 this HCHK Tech bank record?\n10 A. It's entry says outgoing chips transfer auto rep Yacht Zoo\n11 Limited G Fashion Hold Co. B Li.\n12 Q. Do you know what G Fashion hold Co. B. Li refers to?\n13 A. I imagine it's a G Fashion entity.\n14 Q. And looking to the right, the second column which shows the\n15 transaction amount, what is that transaction amount here?\n16 A. $123,452.\n17 Q. Let's go back to Z26, slide 30, Ms. Loftus.\n18 Is that then the 123,000 rounded that we see reflected\n19 on this summary chart?\n20 A. It is.\n21 Q. Let's continue, and let's go to the next slide.\n22 Mr. Hinton, is this kind of a high level summary of\n23 the sources of funds for the primary categories that we've been\n24 looking at over the course of your testimony?\n25 A. It is.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 Q. And if you could just take us through left to right -- and\n2 again, just for clarity, the summary charts that we've been\n3 reviewing, Mr. Hinton, is it correct that these reflect only a\n4 portion of the total transactions that were in the records that\n5 Brattle received?\n6 A. That's correct.\n7 Q. And is it also correct that Brattle did not process every\n8 bank record that it received from the government?\n9 A. That's correct, yes.\n10 Q. So sources of funds, what is the approximate aggregate flow\n11 to the GTV/VOG category?\n12 A. Of all the transactions that we processed, of which there\n13 were thousands for this category, the aggregate amount was\n14 $411 million going to GTV and VOG.\n15 Q. And what about for the farms category, what's the aggregate\n16 amount of sources of funds that flowed to the farms category\n17 that the government identified?\n18 A. Of the transactions we processed, there's $110 million\n19 worth of transactions categorized as going from sources of\n20 funds to farms entities.\n21 Q. What about the G/Clubs category?\n22 A. Likewise for the G/Clubs category, we identified and\n23 processed $240 million of individual transactions from sources\n24 of funds accounts.\n25 Q. And finally the Himalaya Exchange category, what is the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 aggregate amount of processed money flowing to that category?\n2 A. 517 million.\n3 Q. Ms. Loftus, can we go to the next slide, please. This sums\n4 it up for us, Mr. Hinton.\n5 Among those four broad categories, what amount do we\n6 see going from sources of funds into those categories?\n7 A. Collectively they make up $1.3 billion.\n8 Q. And let's go to the next slide.\n9 What is reflected here at the bottom of this slide for\n10 outflows from that broad $1.3 billion worth of sources of\n11 funds?\n12 A. Yes. At the bottom of the slide we're indicating that\n13 there were outflows collectively from these four entities,\n14 entities that were classified into these four categories. From\n15 all of the transactions that we processed, we were able to\n16 identify net inflows into these two other groups of accounts.\n17 Q. And so looking first at the left, family offices and family\n18 members, is that a collective category reflective of what we\n19 saw yesterday on Government Exhibit Z27 where the government\n20 identified who qualifies as a family member or what qualifies\n21 as a family office?\n22 A. Right. I think you're referring to that beautifully\n23 multi-colored list of all the different accounts, and we had a\n24 column for family offices and family members. And at the\n25 bottom there was a footnote that descrived what were the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 entities that were classified in that column.\n2 Q. And for purposes of this summary chart, is the\n3 classification the same for family offices and members here as\n4 it was on that other summary chart?\n5 A. Yes, it is.\n6 Q. What are the net inflows we see from the collective 1.3\n7 billion going to either family offices or family members?\n8 A. We compute that the net amount of inflows, that means the\n9 amount coming in less whatever amounts went out is $100\n10 million.\n11 Q. And then looking on the right companies owned by William\n12 Je, are those the companies we discussed yesterday that the\n13 government identified for you, the Hamilton and ACA Capital\n14 entities?\n15 A. That's correct.\n16 Q. And of the aggregate $1.3 billion, what approximate amount\n17 of net inflows do we see going into those companies, the\n18 William Je companies?\n19 A. From these four different entities we see net inflows to\n20 the ACA Capital and Hamilton accounts of 550 million.\n21 Q. Let's go to the next slide, please, Ms. Loftus.\n22 What's the title of this slide, Mr. Hinton?\n23 A. This is titled cumulative sources of funds inflows by\n24 category.\n25 Q. Is this a different visual representation of the $1.3\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Direct\n1 billion sources of funds money that we just looked at on the\n2 prior slides?\n3 A. Yes, it just shows how it built up over time.\n4 Q. Can you explain for the jury what the different colors\n5 represent and how they build over time as we go from 2020 here\n6 to 2023?\n7 A. Yes. Well, because we're building up this number from all\n8 the individual over 200,000 transactions, we have the date of\n9 every single transaction, so it's possible to compute a daily.\n10 In this case we do it monthly, but a cumulative amount of the\n11 inflows into all the accounts that are classified into these\n12 four different categories, each one having a different color.\n13 So underlying each of those bands of color are many, many\n14 individual entities, and for each of those entities many\n15 individual accounts that are receiving money in the form of\n16 sources of funds.\n17 Q. And the amounts that are totaled within each color band,\n18 Mr. Hinton, are those the amounts associated with the\n19 categories indicated on the bottom of this chart?\n20 A. Those are the amounts that you get to by the end of July\n21 2023. You can see that in each case they sort of build up at\n22 different points in time to reach that total.\n23 Q. And then starting at the bottom of this chart working up,\n24 is it correct based on the key at the bottom and the colors\n25 that we start with GTV/VOG, add on the farms, then G/Club and\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 finally starting at some point it looks like in late 2022 the\n2 Himalaya Exchange?\n3 A. Yes, just by stacking them up, you can see what they sum to\n4 altogether.\n5 Q. Mr. Hinton, in this case for purposes of the summary\n6 exhibits that we reviewed with the jury yesterday and today, is\n7 it correct that the government prepared or advised what\n8 information it wanted reflected on those summary charts?\n9 A. It did.\n10 Q. And in the course of either preparing or reviewing those\n11 summary charts, did you and Brattle take instruction from the\n12 government?\n13 A. We did.\n14 MS. MURRAY: May I have a moment, your Honor?\n15 THE COURT: You may.\n16 MS. MURRAY: Thank you, Mr. Hinton. I have nothing\n17 further.\n18 THE COURT: Cross examination.\n19 MR. KAMARAJU: Thank you, your Honor.\n20 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n21 BY MR. KAMARAJU:\n22 Q. Good morning, Mr. Hinton.\n23 A. Good morning.\n24 MR. KAMARAJU: Before we start, just a little bit of\n25 housekeeping, your Honor. At this time I'd like to read a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 stipulation between the parties.\n2 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n3 MR. KAMARAJU: Could we please pull up Government\n4 Exhibit Stip-14, please, and it's in evidence already so we can\n5 publish it.\n6 \"It is hereby stipulated and agreed by the United\n7 States of America and Miles Guo, the defendant, the below\n8 listed exhibits were lawfully obtained by the government and\n9 are authentic records of the entity listed in column A that\n10 were made at or near the time by or from information\n11 transmitted by a person with knowledge of matters set forth in\n12 the records. Such records were kept in the course of the\n13 regularly conducted activity, and it was a regular practice of\n14 the entity to make the records.\"\n15 And then could we go to page eight of this\n16 stipulation.\n17 \"It is further stipulated and agreed that the defense\n18 exhibits listed in column C may be received as defense exhibits\n19 at trial.\" Then can we go back to the front page, please.\n20 Your Honor, pursuant to this stipulation, I'm going to\n21 offer several exhibits at this time.\n22 THE COURT: All righty.\n23 MS. MURRAY: No objection.\n24 MR. KAMARAJU: So the defense offers DX-11124 through\n25 11129, DX-11255, DX-11432 through 11436, DX-10299 through\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 DX-10301, DX-13005 through DX-10329, DX-10526, DX-10528 through\n2 DX-10530, DX-10551 through DX-10562, DX-10564 through DX-10577,\n3 DX-11299 through DX-11300, DX-11302, DX-11304 and DX-11305,\n4 DX-11485, DX-11486 through, DX-11488, DX-11489, DX-11491\n5 through DX-11492, DX-11548 through DX-11549, DX-11552 through\n6 DX-11553, DX-11562 through DX-11570, DX-10430 through DX-10457,\n7 DX-10960 through DX-10971, DX-11073 through DX-11078, DX-11110\n8 through DX-11121, DX-11493 through DX-11506, DX-10007,\n9 DX-10531, DX-10606 through DX-10626, DX-10008 through DX-10010,\n10 DX-10330 through DX-10356, DX-10578 through DX-10605, DX-11256\n11 through DX-11257, DX-11281, DX-11517 through DX-11526, DX-11572\n12 through DX-11573, DX-11581, DX-11585, DX-10357 through\n13 DX-10359, DX-10627 through DX-10631, DX-10972, DX-10013,\n14 DX-10017 through DX-10028, DX-10360 through DX-10373.\n15 (Counsel conferred)\n16 MR. KAMARAJU: If it will speed it along, your Honor,\n17 I'll offer every exhibit in Column C of the stipulation.\n18 THE COURT: They are admitted.\n19 (Defendant's Exhibits DX-11124 through 11129,\n20 DX-11255, DX-11432 through 11436, DX-10299 through DX-10301,\n21 DX-13005 through DX-10329, DX-10526, DX-10528 through DX-10530,\n22 DX-10551 through DX-10562, DX-10564 through DX-10577, DX-11299\n23 through DX-11300, DX-11302, DX-11304 and DX-11305, DX-11485,\n24 DX-11486 through, DX-11488, DX-11489, DX-11491 through\n25 DX-11492, DX-11548 through DX-11549, DX-11552 through DX-11553,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 DX-11562 through DX-11570, DX-10430 through DX-10457, DX-10960\n2 through DX-10971, DX-11073 through DX-11078, DX-11110 through\n3 DX-11121, DX-11493 through DX-11506, DX-10007, DX-10531,\n4 DX-10606 through DX-10626, DX-10008 through DX-10010, DX-10330\n5 through DX-10356, DX-10578 through DX-10605, DX-11256 through\n6 DX-11257, DX-11281, DX-11517 through DX-11526, DX-11572 through\n7 DX-11573, DX-11581, DX-11585, DX-10357 through DX-10359,\n8 DX-10627 through DX-10631, DX-10972, DX-10013, DX-10017 through\n9 DX-10028, DX-10360 through DX-10373 received in evidence)\n10 MR. KAMARAJU: Thank you.\n11 BY MR. KAMARAJU:\n12 Q. Just one other housekeeping detail, Mr. Hinton, can you\n13 confirm for the jury, please, sir that you are not in fact a\n14 Chinese spy?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Thank you. Now, Brattle was first retained by the\n17 government in the summer of 2023, correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. And Brattle has a team working on this project, right?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And you were involved from the start of Brattle's\n22 engagement, correct?\n23 A. Correct.\n24 Q. And over the course of that engagement, Brattle has been\n25 compensated for its work by the government?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. That's correct.\n2 Q. And I believe you testified on direct you receive about $2\n3 million, correct?\n4 A. Well, I think that's an estimate of the amount of fees.\n5 I'm not sure what's being collected.\n6 Q. You're owed $2 million?\n7 A. As I said, I think my -- we've accrued certain amounts of\n8 fees.\n9 Q. That work entailed doing the fund analysis that you\n10 testified about on direct among other things, correct?\n11 A. That's right.\n12 Q. And you only learned about GTV from the prosecutors, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. You only learn about the farm loan program from the\n15 prosecutors, correct?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. Same with G/Clubs, right?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. And the same with the Himalaya Exchange, right?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Now, did you learn about Mr. Guo from the prosecutors?\n22 A. No.\n23 Q. When did you first hear of him?\n24 A. When the government contacted us.\n25 Q. Your testimony today was about summaries you prepared of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 evidence in this case, right?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. And the prosecutor provided you with the evidence they\n4 wanted you to summarize, right?\n5 A. They provided us with a large number of documents at the\n6 beginning we had to sort of identify, and then they selected\n7 certain of those for us to put onto certain charts.\n8 Q. So it's fair to say they identified the evidence they\n9 wanted summarized?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. As part of that, for example, they gave you companies that\n12 they wanted you to focus on, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Same with the bank accounts, they gave you those too,\n15 right?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. And they told you what kind of charts they wanted, right?\n18 A. That's right.\n19 Q. And they instructed you to make changes to those charts,\n20 right?\n21 A. Yes, additions, yes, adjustments.\n22 Q. Additions, subtractions, modifications, all kinds of\n23 changes, right?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. You also testified that you had been working in earnest on\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 this project I think since the start of the year; is that\n2 right?\n3 A. That was the more intensive period, yes.\n4 Q. So even though Brattle has been retained for more than a\n5 year, it's true that the prosecutors were directing changes to\n6 your chart through last night, correct?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. I want to talk just a little bit about the process.\n9 So you testified I think on direct about the process\n10 that Brattle uses to analyze data, right?\n11 A. A little bit, yes.\n12 Q. Not the entire process, but just a little bit, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And that's, to use a colloquial term, maybe you scrub the\n15 data in different ways?\n16 A. I wouldn't say that.\n17 Q. But part of the process is deciding what's relevant to the\n18 task, right?\n19 A. Well, not for me.\n20 Q. That's going to be my next question. It's the government\n21 deciding what's relevant, right?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And then they tell you, right?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. And then you go out and find it, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. No.\n2 Q. So what do you do after the government tells you what they\n3 think is relevant?\n4 A. I think the sequencing is a little different. They gave us\n5 the records. We told them what's in the record, and then they\n6 told us which of those records they wanted us to process. But\n7 they didn't know what was in the records until we processed\n8 them, so we were then to share the results with the government.\n9 Q. So it's a back and forth; fair to say?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. You told them, this is what's out there. They said, that's\n12 what we care about, right?\n13 A. That's right.\n14 Q. And they never told you that they care about anything that\n15 was helpful to Mr. Guo, right?\n16 A. I have no idea.\n17 Q. Cause that's not part of your retention, right?\n18 A. I'm sorry.\n19 Q. Withdrawn. Now, the prosecutors also reviewed your summary\n20 charts for accuracy, right?\n21 A. I believe so.\n22 Q. Was that part of the changes that they made or proposed\n23 changes for accuracy, sir?\n24 A. Not so much for accuracy, to ensure that all the\n25 transactions that they wanted included were actually included,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 and not those that should not be included.\n2 Q. Does Brattle do its own independent check for accuracy?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. Can you describe that process to us?\n5 A. Well, there's many different checks. Obviously when the\n6 database and the extraction is happening, individual team\n7 members are checking each others work. But then ultimately\n8 what happens here is after the charts have been produced based\n9 on the transactions that the government wanted to be\n10 represented on the charts, we're able to identify every single\n11 source document associated with those transactions and then\n12 check the amounts against those source documents.\n13 Q. So let's take a look at one of those charts. Could we\n14 please pull up Government Exhibit Z26. Could we go to slide\n15 four, please.\n16 So you testified about this on direct, correct, sir?\n17 A. I did.\n18 Q. First, the sources of funds box, what sources go into that?\n19 A. Well, sources of funds are identified as flows of funds\n20 from individual accounts where those individuals are not\n21 persons who have been identified as persons of interest or\n22 persons who are associated with any of the corporate agreements\n23 that we processed for the entities that are associated with the\n24 categories the government gave us.\n25 There was also in some charts I discussed on direct,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 you may recall that there were certain amounts that were\n2 flowing into G/Clubs/Crane account that were in round amounts\n3 of 10,000, 20,000, 30,000, 40,000, 50,000 where there wasn't\n4 actually the name of an individual indicated in the bank\n5 records, that information was blank. But in those specific\n6 instances, the government told us to also categorize those an\n7 inflows, as sources of funds.\n8 Q. Got it. So with the exception of that last category that\n9 you talked about, the blind contracts, is it fair to say that\n10 the sources of fund process was a process of elimination?\n11 A. I wouldn't say that.\n12 Q. Well, you eliminated persons of interest, right?\n13 A. No, we started by identifying all the transactions in the\n14 accounts that the government told us to process and identified\n15 all the transactions of inflows from individuals.\n16 Q. And then you categorized those individuals, right?\n17 A. Then we identified which, if any, of those individuals\n18 should not be included and excluded those.\n19 Q. And one of the groups of people who should not be included\n20 were persons of interest, right?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Who decided what a person of interest was?\n23 A. The government.\n24 Q. Can you give me an example of who some of the people are\n25 who are in the persons of interest category?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. That would be the persons who were showing up in family\n2 members category or the defendant for example.\n3 Q. And were there any other categories of people that you\n4 excluded?\n5 A. Yes. As I said, there were persons who were identified as\n6 signatory or counter-parties in service agreements and other\n7 contracts between the entities that were in the various\n8 categories that were in my summary charts.\n9 Q. And those are service agreements that were identified to\n10 you by the government?\n11 A. Yes. One of the assignments the government gave us,\n12 actually our first assignment was to review various different\n13 types of agreements, including the farm loans that we discussed\n14 on my direct. There was a detail list of those loans. Those\n15 were actually individual loan documents, and those were among\n16 some of the agreements that we processed.\n17 Q. So the farm loan documents that you testified about on\n18 direct, they were signed by the lenders, correct?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. But not the borrowers, right?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Did you exclude the lenders from the sources of funds?\n23 A. No, just the persons who were associated with the entities\n24 that are in each of these farms, GTV, Himalaya, etc.,\n25 categories.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. So there's further selection within the idea of the\n2 counter-parties on the agreements, right?\n3 A. Yes. So anybody who is a party to an agreement who's\n4 working for one of these entities or signing on behalf of one\n5 of these entities, not a person who is providing sources of\n6 funds.\n7 Q. Did you discuss with the prosecutors why they focused on\n8 these particular sources of funds on slide four?\n9 A. No.\n10 Q. So you have no idea what the import of this slide is in\n11 term -- withdrawn. That's a bad question. I apologize.\n12 Let's just look at the VOG box on the left. You see\n13 that?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. The date range on that is from April 2020 to October 13,\n16 2020, correct?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. Have you ever heard of the GTV private placement?\n19 A. I think I've seen references to a private placement in the\n20 documents.\n21 Q. Could we pull up GXC63-T alongside this exhibit, please.\n22 So on the left is the translation of a June 2020 broadcast.\n23 Could we just blow up or highlight the line that starts, It's\n24 almost in the first bucket there.\n25 Can you just read that, Mr. Hinton?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. It's almost 12 o'clock noon on June 2nd.\n2 Q. Can we go to page seven and highlight the line when you get\n3 there, GTV is now, it's in the fourth box down.\n4 Can you read the part of that sentence that starts,\n5 GTV is?\n6 A. GTV is now starting to be legal.\n7 Q. You would agree with me, sir, that June 2, 2020 is earlier\n8 than October 13, 2020?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. And you would agree with me that if you expand the scope of\n11 the date range that you're looking in that could include more\n12 money flows, correct?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. We can take that down. Can we put up GXZ26 again, same\n15 slide. Let's look in the middle box, the one that says Saraca.\n16 You see that?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. What's the date range for that $286 million?\n19 A. February 22, 2019 through July 3, 2020.\n20 Q. Could we just pull up alongside of GXBK-5, please,\n21 alongside it. Do you see a date on that document on the right?\n22 A. April 20th, 2020.\n23 Q. And you would agree with me, sir, that April 20, 2020 is\n24 more than a year after February 22, 2019?\n25 A. I agree.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. And again if you expand that date range, it would increase\n2 the amount of money coming in, right?\n3 A. Well, just to be clear, this date range represents the date\n4 range of all the transactions that we processed, so those we're\n5 just showing all the transactions that we processed. And, yes,\n6 if there are more transactions from other accounts, we didn't\n7 process, that number could go up.\n8 Q. Sure. And if you expanded the time period, the number\n9 could go up, right?\n10 A. Perhaps. I don't know. I haven't processed those\n11 transactions.\n12 Q. So let's go to slide five. Actually, let's go to slide\n13 six. This is the VOG flow of funds, right?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And you see the middle arrow there?\n16 A. I do.\n17 Q. That's $17.3 million, right?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. And the date range there is March 12, 2018 through May 12,\n20 2020, right?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Again, that's more than two years from the private\n23 placement start date, correct?\n24 A. Based on your representation of when that date was, yes.\n25 Q. Based on the document that I had you read the April 20th\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 date, right?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. And then if we look to the box to the right of that, that\n4 goes to Voice of Guo Media, right. Do you see that?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. And that's $2 million?\n7 A. I'm a little confused as to which arrow you're referring\n8 to.\n9 Q. So maybe can you help me out. The middle box there, the\n10 one for Lafrenz that has WFB 1005. You see that?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Correct me if I'm wrong, it looks like there's an arrow\n13 going from that box to Voice of Guo Media with WFB 5536, right?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And that arrow reflects a fund flow of $2 million over the\n16 period of time between July 11, 2019 and May 5, 2020, correct?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. And July 11th, 2019 is several months before April 20,\n19 2020, correct?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Let's look at slide 15. Let's just start at the top left\n22 there. So you see all those I think you call them dark blue\n23 boxes?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Those are associated with G/Clubs -- withdrawn.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Those reflect bank accounts associated with G/Clubs\n2 Operations, LLC, correct?\n3 A. There's also another blue box for a different G/Club\n4 entity.\n5 Q. So let's start with the ones at the top, the four at the\n6 top. Those are all G/Clubs Operations, right?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And the way that you're able to associate them with G/Clubs\n9 Operations is because all of those accounts are in the name of\n10 G/Clubs Operations, right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. And so the same is true with the other dark blue box that\n13 is in the name of G/Club International Limited, correct?\n14 A. Yes, the one, the Mercantile 0103 account is G/Club\n15 International Limited.\n16 Q. Another way to represent what's going on at the top,\n17 instead of having four boxes, you could just have one\n18 representing G/Club operations, correct?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. But the prosecutors asked you to have four, right?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Now, the same is true if we go over to the light blue boxes\n23 on right. Do you see those?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Those are all for Crane Advisory, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. That's correct.\n2 Q. And again you were able to associate those with Crane\n3 Advisory because all of those accounts are in the name of Crane\n4 Advisory, right?\n5 A. That's right.\n6 Q. So you could have collapse those six boxes into one, right?\n7 A. In theory, yes.\n8 Q. But they didn't want you to do that, right?\n9 A. They instructed us on the format of the chart.\n10 Q. So now let's look at the yellow boxes down at the bottom.\n11 Do you see those?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. Now, the yellow boxes down at the bottom, almost all of\n14 them are associated with something called Hamilton, right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. There's one that's not that doesn't have the word\n17 \"Hamilton\" in the box, right?\n18 A. Yes, there's a Himalaya International Clearing account.\n19 Q. Who told you to put that box in yellow?\n20 A. The government.\n21 Q. So again, all of the Hamilton accounts, the ones that are\n22 actually labeled with Hamilton, you are able to associate those\n23 with Hamilton because they're all in Hamilton's name, right?\n24 A. Yes, there's five Hamilton Opportunity Fund and one\n25 Hamilton Digital Assets.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. Now I'm just going to pick one at random.\n2 The Crane Advisory account that receives $59.5 million\n3 between 11-23-2020 and April 1, 2021, you see that at the top?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. CIT is Citibank, right?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. Citibank is a U.S. bank, right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. Almost all the banks represented on this slide are U.S.\n10 banks, right?\n11 A. Most of them, that's right.\n12 Q. In fact, of the, I don't remember, the 600 bank accounts\n13 that you analyzed roughly, the hundreds of bank accounts that\n14 you analyzed roughly, almost all of them were U.S. bank\n15 accounts, right?\n16 A. Well, there's swiss accounts.\n17 Q. That wasn't my question. I asked you almost all of them?\n18 A. The majority were U.S. bank accounts.\n19 Q. Just staying on this for a second, let's look at the top\n20 left, and I'd like to just circle the 52.2 million from G/Club\n21 Operations to G/Club Operations, that's at the top left box.\n22 Can we circle that 52.2, please.\n23 That's a transfer of $52.2 million on December 17,\n24 2020 between two G/Clubs bank accounts, correct?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. And then let's circle the 14.5 below that. That reflects a\n2 $14.5 million transfer on January 11, 2021, between G/Clubs\n3 bank accounts, correct?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Now let's circle the $10 million one below that to Fiesta,\n6 and that represents a $10 million payment -- withdrawn. A $10\n7 million transfer from G/Clubs Operations account to Fiesta\n8 Property Developments, correct?\n9 A. It's the aggregate amount of transfers between those\n10 periods from those accounts.\n11 Q. So those transfers started on January 21, 2021, right?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. And so those transfers started after the $52 million\n14 transfer and the $14.5 million transfer, right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. So from this chart, how much of the 52.2 million and 14.5\n17 million make up that $10 million?\n18 A. I don't know.\n19 Q. You can't know, right?\n20 A. Well, you could do some tracing analysis and come up with\n21 an estimate.\n22 Q. Right, but you testified on direct that you didn't do that,\n23 right?\n24 A. That's correct.\n25 Q. So there's no way based on this chart to link those amounts\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 to that $10 million, right?\n2 A. They are linked to it on this chart.\n3 Q. Well, I understand that you put arrows there, but there's\n4 no way to say that this dollar is this dollar, right?\n5 A. Well, I disagree. The funds come in at an earlier point in\n6 time, and then funds leave at a later point in time, so that is\n7 a connection.\n8 Q. That is a connection between two dates, right?\n9 A. Between flows of funds.\n10 Q. It's a chronology?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. We'll come back to that. Let's go to the Crane Advisory,\n13 the center bucket there. You see those? Let's start with the\n14 $58.2 million that goes from Citibank account 5278 down to that\n15 light blue box below it, the other Crane Advisory account. You\n16 see that one?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. Then there's an arrow going $6.8 million from that account\n19 to the Lawall Mitchell account. You see that?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. The date range of the $58 million transfer is January 22,\n22 2021 through March 30, 2021, correct?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. And the transfer of the $6.8 million is October 19, 2021,\n25 right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. So that's almost seven months after the last transfer of\n3 the $58.2 million, correct?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. And I believe you testified on direct that this is select\n6 flows, so it doesn't represent all of the transactions,\n7 correct?\n8 A. That's true.\n9 Q. It doesn't reflect any other money that went into that\n10 Crane Advisory group box that received the $58.2 million,\n11 right?\n12 A. No.\n13 Q. Let's stay with this blown up for a second.\n14 A. I disagree. I said no.\n15 Q. You said no to what? I'm sorry. What is it that you're\n16 disagreeing with?\n17 A. With your prior question. I didn't affirm your question.\n18 I disagreed with it.\n19 Q. Okay. Tell me what you're disagreeing with?\n20 A. You said there weren't any other flows coming into that\n21 account. There's another arrow coming into that account. I\n22 just want to be clear.\n23 Q. Understand. That's a fair point. All the potential other\n24 flows that are coming into that account, right?\n25 A. Correct.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. Thank you for that. Let's look then at there is an arrow,\n2 the $58 million. The account that sends $58 million to the\n3 Crane Advisory account also sends $10.7 million to this Crane\n4 Advisory set of IDB bank accounts, correct?\n5 A. Correct.\n6 Q. And that is the last date of those transfers were May 28,\n7 2021, right?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And then there's another transfer to -- from the IDB Crane\n10 accounts to Lawall Mitchell of $1.6 million, correct?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. And that occurs on September 27, 2021, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. So that's almost four months after the last of those $10.7\n15 million transfers, right?\n16 A. Correct.\n17 Q. Let's now go to slide 27, please.\n18 Now this shows various flows of funds related to the\n19 Himalaya Exchange, right?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. So the first box sources of funds that represents the same\n22 sources of funds we were talking about before, right?\n23 A. Correct.\n24 Q. And then it shows about $470 million going from that gray\n25 box to a Himalaya International Clearing bank account, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. And that's an account for the Himalaya Exchange you\n3 understand?\n4 A. I have no independent understanding of what it's for.\n5 Q. So you don't know what company that's associated with?\n6 A. Well, the chart says Himalaya Exchange, and these are the\n7 accounts that are designated, but the title of the account is\n8 Himalaya International Clearing, so I don't know what the role\n9 of that account is.\n10 Q. But the government told you that this was a Himalaya\n11 Exchange bank account?\n12 A. To color it yellow so it's in that category. To say it's a\n13 Himalaya Exchange account is -- that's just a classification\n14 for the purposes of these charts.\n15 Q. Fair enough. They gave you the paint by numbers, right?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. Now, the date range for that is June 2, 2021 through June\n18 30, 2022, right?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Would you agree with me, sir, that November 2021 comes\n21 after June 2, 2021?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Are you're aware that the Himalaya Exchange first launched\n24 trading on November 20, 2021?\n25 A. No.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. So let's go to slide 30, please. This is titled Yacht Zoo\n2 expenses, right?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. Now, there's a $3.9 million sum of all the inflows in the\n5 middle there, right?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. And that's suppose to represent all the money coming in\n8 from these other entities, right?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. So bank accounts, right?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. So you got the G/Club International with 478,000 right; you\n13 got the HCHK, and then the three Lamp bank accounts, right?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. Now, the 478 from G/Clubs that counts in the 3.9 million,\n16 you ever heard of a yacht called the Liberty before?\n17 A. No.\n18 Q. And the date range listed under the 3.9 million, that's May\n19 7, 2020 through October 21, 2022, right?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Can you find for me on this chart a transfer that began on\n22 May 7, 2020?\n23 A. I think it's a typo. It looks like it starts on May 7,\n24 2021 if you look at the transfer on the left.\n25 Q. That's the Lamp Capital one, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. Correct.\n2 Q. The prosecutors didn't ask you to include any transfers to\n3 Yacht Zoo from 2020, right?\n4 A. These are the flows they selected to present on the chart.\n5 Q. And they're all suppose to be from 2021, right?\n6 A. I don't know what the criteria they used to select them.\n7 Q. I'm meant ignoring the typo they're all suppose to be from\n8 2021, right?\n9 A. These all are between 2021 and October 2022.\n10 Q. And that's the date range that they gave you, right?\n11 A. Well, they identified the transactions, and these are the\n12 dates of the transactions.\n13 Q. Now, let's look at slide eight I believe it is. This is\n14 the farm select flows, right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Now, you have no idea what farms means in the context of\n17 this case, right?\n18 A. That's correct.\n19 Q. And there's $77 million that are reflected on this chart\n20 going to a company called ACA Capital, right?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. So first let's take a look at -- there's a transfer from\n23 ACA Capital that goes to Savio Law for $32 million, correct?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. That occurs between of a period of November 12 and November\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 16, 2020, correct?\n2 A. Yes, correct.\n3 Q. And then your chart reflects an arrow going from Savio Law\n4 to Leading Shine of $3 million on August 20, 2020, correct?\n5 A. Correct.\n6 Q. So August 20, 2020 is before November 12, 2020, correct?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. So as a logical matter, the 3 million that went from Savio\n9 Law to Leading Shine could not have been part of the 32 million\n10 that went from ACA Capital, correct?\n11 A. I would agree.\n12 Q. So then let's look down to Lamp Capital the one below it.\n13 Now that's a $5 million transfer from Savio Law to\n14 Lamp Capital, correct?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. And what's the date of that transfer?\n17 A. That is October 15, 2020.\n18 Q. You would similarly agree with me that October 15, 2020 is\n19 before November 12, 2020, correct?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. As a logical matter, that $5 million couldn't have come\n22 from that $32 million, correct?\n23 A. That's correct.\n24 Q. And then there's also a $5 million transfer from Savio Law\n25 to Greenwich Land, correct?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. And what's the date of that?\n3 A. October 15, 2020.\n4 Q. Same thing, right, October 15th is before November 12,\n5 2020?\n6 A. Correct.\n7 Q. So that money couldn't have come from the $32 million,\n8 correct?\n9 A. That's correct.\n10 Q. But the prosecutor asked you to put these arrows this way\n11 anyway, right?\n12 A. I don't know what you mean by anyway. These arrows reflect\n13 transactions that are represented accurately on the chart.\n14 Q. They represent transactions that happened, right?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Now, there's another box all the way up in the top left.\n17 Do you see that?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. It says other inflows. You see that?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. What are other inflows?\n22 A. Well, it's other sources of funds -- well, sorry. Other\n23 transfers into the ACA Capital account that aren't otherwise\n24 represented on this chart, so from sources other than farms.\n25 Q. You met with the prosecutors this past Saturday, correct?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. June 20th, right?\n3 A. I believe that was the date.\n4 Q. And during that meeting you discussed this slide?\n5 A. I don't remember which of the slides we discussed on\n6 Saturday versus Sunday versus Monday.\n7 Q. Now, prior to that meeting, there was a version of this\n8 slide that didn't have the other inflows on it, correct?\n9 A. Probably, yes.\n10 Q. And after your meeting -- and you told the prosecutors that\n11 there were these other inflows, right?\n12 A. I don't remember whether that was something I said.\n13 Q. So can you tell me the process by which the other inflows\n14 box got added to this slide?\n15 A. Well, the prosecutors asked that we add it to the slide.\n16 Q. When did that happen?\n17 A. I don't recall.\n18 Q. Now, do you remember or recall in reference of this issue\n19 Brattle using the phrase inflow/outflow violation?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. What's that mean?\n22 A. It's just a balancing check that was conducted for certain\n23 of the needs on the chart.\n24 Q. Can you break that down for the jury a little bit?\n25 A. Sure. Just that because these charts don't show all of the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 transactions, they're only showing the transactions that we\n2 processed and the transactions between the entities that were\n3 selected on the charts, it's possible that the amounts that are\n4 shown on the arrows, if you sum up all the arrows going into\n5 the account and going out, that the amount going out might be\n6 larger than the amount coming in; so that's just the balancing\n7 question or check that we were asked to sometime perform for\n8 some of these nodes.\n9 Q. So if the outflows exceed the inflows from a particular\n10 source, that means that there was money in the account outside\n11 of the specific source that you were looking at, correct?\n12 A. Right. That either means that there was a preexisting\n13 balance in the account before the time period where we had\n14 data, or there were other entities that had transferred money\n15 into the account that weren't being shown on the chart.\n16 Q. So one of the ways that the prosecutors try to address this\n17 violation was by sending you more entities that they could\n18 classify as farms, right?\n19 A. If you want to try to explain more of the inflows, you've\n20 got to identify what are those transactions and who are they\n21 with. So there were a couple of examples where there were\n22 changes made to the chart to give us more financial records so\n23 we could add those financial records to the chart.\n24 Q. Right. And the goal of that was to increase the inflows\n25 from the so-called farms, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. In that particular case, yes. There were additional\n2 entities identified as farms while we were preparing the\n3 summary charts and looking at different iterations of those,\n4 the government decided to add additional entities to the farms\n5 classification.\n6 Q. And Brattle didn't do any kind of independent check to\n7 figure out if those were actually farms, right?\n8 A. That's correct.\n9 Q. That all came from the government, right?\n10 A. That's correct.\n11 Q. Even after that were you able to solve the so-called\n12 violation?\n13 A. It's nothing really to solve. It's just a balancing test\n14 to see whether or not the number of inflows, the amounts are\n15 greater than -- inflows are greater or less than the amounts\n16 that you're showing going out. That's all it is.\n17 Q. And is it fair to say that the fact that there's this other\n18 inflows box means that the farm inflows did not account for all\n19 of the money that came out of the ACA Capital account?\n20 A. That's right.\n21 Q. Now, there's no amount of money on this chart associated\n22 with those other inflows, right?\n23 A. That's right.\n24 Q. So the chart doesn't tell the jury how large those inflows\n25 are, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. That's right.\n2 Q. There's no dates associated with it, right?\n3 A. That's right.\n4 Q. There's no date range, right?\n5 A. That's right.\n6 MS. MURRAY: Asked and answered.\n7 THE COURT: Sustained.\n8 Q. So if you take that $19 million that goes from ACA Capital\n9 to Lexington Property, you see that?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. How much of that money comes from the other inflows versus\n12 the 77 million from the farms?\n13 A. I haven't been asked to do that calculation.\n14 Q. So you don't know?\n15 A. I don't know.\n16 Q. Same question with the 11.2 million that goes to William Je\n17 and Sing Ting Wang?\n18 A. I don't know. I haven't been asked to do that calculation.\n19 Q. Let's go to Hudson Diamond, the 18 million that Ms. Murray\n20 asked you about, how about that one. How much of the 18\n21 million comes from the 77 million?\n22 A. I don't know.\n23 Q. Were you asked to look?\n24 A. No.\n25 Q. All right. How about the 13 million that goes to Lamp\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Capital right next to it, how about that?\n2 A. I don't know.\n3 Q. Were you asked to look?\n4 A. I wasn't instructed to perform a tracing analysis.\n5 Q. So the five million that goes to Greenwich Land, same\n6 answer?\n7 A. Same answer.\n8 Q. So even though there are arrows connecting the ACA Capital\n9 box and those entities we just talked about and arrows\n10 connecting the farms and ACA Capital, you don't actually know\n11 if any of that $77 million accounts for these transfers, right?\n12 A. I haven't traced the funds through to their ultimate uses,\n13 that's correct.\n14 Q. In fact, I believe you testified on direct that there are\n15 bank accounts that Brattle hasn't even looked at, right?\n16 A. That's correct.\n17 THE COURT: It's time for our 11:30 break. Members of\n18 the jury, we will come back in a half an hour. Remember that\n19 you're not allowed to discuss the case amongst yourselves.\n20 Don't permit anyone to discuss the case in your presence.\n21 Don't read, watch or listen to anything that has to do with\n22 this case.\n23 THE LAW CLERK: Jury exiting.\n24 (Jury not present)\n25 THE COURT: Sir, you may step out of the courtroom.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Don't discuss your testimony.\n2 THE WITNESS: I will not.\n3 (Witness exited the courtroom)\n4 THE COURT: You may be seated. Is there anything\n5 before we return at noon?\n6 MS. MURRAY: One brief matter to raise, your Honor.\n7 With respect to certain of Mr. Kamaraju's questioning, in\n8 particular relating to the ACA Capital account at First Abu\n9 Dhabi Bank, this is on slide eight of the exhibit we were just\n10 looking at. Mr. Kamaraju pursued a line of questioning about\n11 this category reflected on the summary chart that is listed as\n12 other inflows where there's no date range or dollar amount\n13 associated with that. As the Court and Mr. Kamaraju are both\n14 aware, the First Abu Dhabi bank account records were apart of\n15 the government's collected evidence in this case. They were\n16 used in the course of the government's financial analysis over\n17 the period of several years. Ultimately, the Court excluded\n18 those from being admitted because of the issues we had with the\n19 Arab Emirates not giving us the certification that we could use\n20 to introduce those into evidence. But they are very\n21 corroborative of the flows that are on this chart.\n22 The government consistent with the Court's order\n23 stripped out any sourcing from any of those records. So we\n24 redid all of the financial analysis not tied to those records,\n25 but instead tied to counter-parties records. As a result, the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 numbers went down on the summary charts, and that's fine.\n2 That's been covered with Mr. Hinton on his direct. But this is\n3 not -- this is not fully inclusive of all of the flow of funds\n4 we see. And again, that's because the government consistent\n5 with the Court's order did not rely on those records. But for\n6 Mr. Kamaraju to imply very strongly with the witness here that\n7 this other inflows category was suggested by the government in\n8 what he appears to be suggesting an apparent effort to\n9 manipulate the summary of the financial flows, your Honor, we\n10 would submit that opens the door and we can question Mr. Hinton\n11 on redirect whether he did receive First Abu Dhabi bank account\n12 records from the government, and whether the transactions\n13 reflected therein are consistent with the information on these\n14 summary charts. And we can establish that he did not rely on\n15 those for purposes of the total amounts reflected on the\n16 charts, but we would like to acknowledge their existence as a\n17 way of explaining the purpose of this other inflows category\n18 now that the door has been open by Mr. Kamaraju.\n19 THE COURT: Well, how do you explain the absence?\n20 MS. MURRAY: The absence of what, your Honor?\n21 THE COURT: References to that bank?\n22 MS. MURRAY: Well, there are references to the bank\n23 because we have represented the transactions as they were\n24 established and sourced through the counter-parties, so we have\n25 up slide eight of Government Exhibit Z26. You can see the ACA\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 Capital FAB account. That's the first Abu Dhabi bank account,\n2 and I think Ms. Loftus is pulling that up. To the extent that\n3 there are transfers that are indicated here, we show -- if we\n4 could zoom out, Ms. Loftus, and show more of the context there.\n5 To the extent there are transfers that are shown flowing out\n6 from that account, that's from the accounts that are referenced\n7 here, the government exhibit cited in the appendix to this\n8 chart. I think with respect to the absence, it could just be a\n9 question to Mr. Hinton, Did you review records from that\n10 account? Are they consistent with the information on this\n11 summary chart? Did you rely on those records in sourcing the\n12 information on this chart? Why not? Is it because the\n13 government asked you not to rely on these as source records?\n14 And we could leave it at that.\n15 THE COURT: Mr. Kamaraju.\n16 MR. KAMARAJU: A couple of points, your Honor. Number\n17 one, Mr. Hinton is a summary witness. He can only summarize or\n18 speak to evidence that's admissible and admitted in the record.\n19 Your Honor has already decided that the First Abu Dhabi bank\n20 account is not admissible. They chose to present a chart that\n21 tried to link those funds to these transfers without the\n22 necessary evidentiary link. I was entitled to point that out.\n23 They've been on notice of this issue since your Honor decided.\n24 These charts all come after that.\n25 On top of that, your Honor, the concept that they\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 would say, well, you had these records. You reviewed them.\n2 They corroborate it, would necessarily open the door to us\n3 being able to say, in fact, the Court found that those records\n4 were not reliable enough to be entered into evidence in this\n5 case, and those records were hearsay, and that the government\n6 had failed to authenticate them. So I don't understand how the\n7 government can refer to evidence that's not been admitted at\n8 trial simply because I attack their summary chart and the\n9 material that they had. He still -- and I circle back to my\n10 original point -- a summary witness by rule has to testify to\n11 evidence that is in, that has been admitted. And your Honor's\n12 already ruled on this issue. They didn't have to present this\n13 chart this way. That was their choice.\n14 THE COURT: Ms. Murray.\n15 MS. MURRAY: Your Honor, I think at this point what\n16 we're facing is Mr. Kamaraju has created a Rule 403 problem.\n17 To the extent that the Court doesn't want the government to\n18 explore this line of questioning with Mr. Hinton, I guess we\n19 understand that. It does seem like a strategy in play by the\n20 defense to exploit the Court's ruling with respect to the ACA\n21 Capital records in particular, which as we indicated in the\n22 briefing leading up to trial are extremely important records\n23 for the purposes of the flow of funds. We did summarize the\n24 flow of funds using other admissible exhibits from other\n25 accounts that we collected, but that's accurately reflected on\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 these charts.\n2 However, to continue going down this line of\n3 questioning knowing what the parties know and the Court knows\n4 about those records and the status of those records risk\n5 prejudicing the jury and confusing the issues. At kind of the\n6 bottom, the government would ask that the Court request that\n7 Mr. Kamaraju move on from this line of questioning.\n8 MR. KAMARAJU: I'll just say this, your Honor. It is\n9 very emphatically the defense's strategy to point out the lack\n10 of evidence in the government's case. To the extent they are\n11 concerned about that, that is our strategy. Here, we are\n12 pointing out the fact that they do not have admissible evidence\n13 to link these bank flows, which is directly responsive to their\n14 attempt to say that this money was misused on Mr. Guo's family.\n15 The fact that they were not able to authenticate that record\n16 does not create a 403 problem. And my ability to attack that\n17 is fundamental to presenting a defense. I've never heard of a\n18 case where undermining the government's evidence creates a 403\n19 issue. And there's no prejudice to the jury, as Ms. Murray\n20 said. The jury can understand what's going on. They can make\n21 arguments about the tracing if they want. But the jury is the\n22 one who gets to decide that.\n23 They don't get to say, well, Mr. Kamaraju shouldn't\n24 pursue questions that show a weakness in our case because we\n25 know about inadmissible records. I know about inadmissible\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO2 Hinton - Cross\n1 information also that I would love to refer to in Mr. Guo's\n2 defense, but I can't do it because it's not admitted into\n3 evidence.\n4 THE COURT: So I am not going to permit the government\n5 to go into these Abu Dhabi records.\n6 MR. KAMARAJU: Thank you, your Honor.\n7 THE COURT: That's it.\n8 (Recess)\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Cross\n1 AFTERNOON SESSION\n2 12:00 p.m.\n3 THE COURT: Please have the jurors brought in.\n4 (Jury present)\n5 THE COURT: Please be seated.\n6 Sir, remember that you're still under oath.\n7 THE WITNESS: Yes.\n8 THE COURT: You may continue the inquiry.\n9 MR. KAMARAJU: All right. Could we have those two\n10 exhibits back up, or I think we were looking at GX Z26 when we\n11 broke, please. Slide 8.\n12 BY MR. KAMARAJU:\n13 Q. Okay. Now just go through this slide quickly. The Savio\n14 Law account you looked at before with Ms. Murray, you remember\n15 that?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. Okay. That was a U.S. bank account, correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. Okay. The IDB account for HCHK Technologies, U.S. bank\n20 account, correct?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. The IVB account for Leading Shine, U.S. bank account,\n23 right?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. All the Lamp Capital bank accounts, U.S. bank accounts,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Cross\n1 right?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. Same with the Greenwich Land account, right?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. Same for the Signature accounts reflected for Lamp Capital?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. Same for the IDB accounts, correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And the same for the DCB account, correct?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. For Lexington Property?\n12 A. Yes, I believe so.\n13 MR. KAMARAJU: Now could we pull up alongside this\n14 Exhibit GX Z27, please.\n15 Q. All right. So Ms. Murray took you through this. Do you\n16 remember that?\n17 A. I do.\n18 Q. Okay. So on GX Z27, which is on the right side, the total\n19 number of accounts that Brattle identified was 681 accounts,\n20 correct?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. Processed accounts, 450, right?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. Okay. So that means that——is processed and analyzed the\n25 same subset?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. Well, it depends on what you mean by processed and\n2 analyzed. Analyzed sometimes we think of as including the\n3 processing, right? That's part of the analysis in a broad\n4 sense.\n5 Q. Okay. I guess what I'm trying to ask, sir——and maybe doing\n6 it inartfully——is: The 450 accounts that are reflected there,\n7 those are ones that Brattle actually looked at and reviewed and\n8 attempted to provide evidence on? Sorry. Withdrawn.\n9 Those are accounts that Brattle actually reviewed and\n10 kind of dove into, the 450?\n11 A. Right. Those are the ones that we extracted the\n12 transaction data from, put them in the database, and that was\n13 the starting point for various exhibits that were developed for\n14 testimony, but——but not all of the transactions and accounts\n15 that are in the database end up in the exhibits.\n16 Q. Got it. Understood. Thank you, sir. That's helpful.\n17 So then the 231 that's reflected there, those accounts\n18 never made it to the database, right?\n19 A. We did not process those; that's correct.\n20 Q. Okay. So no data from those 231 bank accounts is reflected\n21 in the summary chart anywhere, right?\n22 A. That's correct.\n23 Q. And it's not reflected in any of the summary charts that\n24 you've testified about today other than this little entry that\n25 we're looking at, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Cross\n1 A. Correct.\n2 Q. So the chart reflects——withdrawn.\n3 MR. KAMARAJU: We can take GX Z27 down. And I'd like\n4 to put up DX 10339 alongside, which is in evidence, so we can\n5 publish it, please.\n6 Okay. Can we go to page 3, please.\n7 Q. Okay. Do you see at the bottom there, three transfers,\n8 May 2nd?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 MR. KAMARAJU: Okay. Actually, I'm sorry. Can we\n11 zoom out real quick.\n12 Q. I think it would be helpful to establish the date. Do you\n13 see the Line Service Charge Summary? Can you read that,\n14 please.\n15 MR. KAMARAJU: Maybe we can highlight it.\n16 A. Yes. \"Service Charge Summary from April 1, 2018 thru\n17 April 30, 2018.\"\n18 Q. So that's the period of this bank statement, correct?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Okay. And now let's look down at those transfers. You see\n21 the ones from May 2nd?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Okay. So that's $300,000 over the course of those three\n24 transfers, correct?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. And who were those transfers from?\n2 A. They're from ACA Capital.\n3 MR. KAMARAJU: Okay. And let's zoom back out.\n4 And let's go to the top. And let's see whose bank\n5 account this is, please.\n6 Q. Do you see Golden Spring (New York) there?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. Okay. That's the bank account holder, correct?\n9 A. I believe so.\n10 Q. All right. Now these three transfers of $300,000 are not\n11 reflected in your summary chart, correct?\n12 A. That's correct.\n13 MR. KAMARAJU: Let's go to page 13, please.\n14 Q. All right. And do you see a transaction on July 19th, for\n15 $2 million?\n16 MR. KAMARAJU: Maybe we can blow that up.\n17 A. I do.\n18 Q. Who is that from?\n19 A. That is from ACA Capital also.\n20 Q. That's not reflected on your summary chart, right?\n21 A. That's correct.\n22 MR. KAMARAJU: Okay. Let's go to page 18, please.\n23 Q. All right. And do you see the transfer on August 20, 2018,\n24 for $500,000?\n25 A. I do.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. Who is that from?\n2 A. ACA Capital.\n3 Q. That's not reflected on your chart, right?\n4 A. That's correct.\n5 MR. KAMARAJU: So let's go to page 45, please.\n6 Q. All right. And do you see a transfer on January 14, 2019,\n7 for approximately $4,499,000?\n8 A. I do.\n9 Q. Okay. Who is that from?\n10 A. ACA Capital.\n11 Q. That's not reflected on your chart, right?\n12 A. That's correct.\n13 MR. KAMARAJU: Let's go to page 89.\n14 Q. All right. And do you see a transfer of $3 million on\n15 August 8, 2019?\n16 A. I do.\n17 Q. Who is that from?\n18 A. This one's from ACA Capital.\n19 Q. Okay. That's not reflected on your chart either, right?\n20 A. That's correct.\n21 MR. KAMARAJU: Okay. Let's take down 10339 and put up\n22 10381. Alongside, please.\n23 Okay. And let's flip to the next page, please. Keep\n24 going.\n25 All right. Actually, let's go to page 23.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Cross\n1 Q. All right. Let's start at the top. Can you tell us who\n2 the account holder is.\n3 A. Leading Shine NY Ltd.\n4 MR. KAMARAJU: All right. And let's scroll back down.\n5 Q. And do you see a transfer on January 22, 2019, for almost\n6 $3 million?\n7 A. I do.\n8 Q. Okay. Who is that from?\n9 A. Well, it's from a——it's from ACA Capital.\n10 Q. Okay. And what bank?\n11 A. First Abu Dhabi Bank.\n12 Q. All right. That's not reflected on your chart, right?\n13 A. That's——that's correct.\n14 MR. KAMARAJU: All right. Can we go to page 41,\n15 please.\n16 Q. And do you see a transfer on August 8, 2019, for\n17 $3 million? Do you see that?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. Who is that from?\n20 A. It's from ACA Capital also.\n21 Q. What bank account?\n22 A. From the First Abu Dhabi Bank account.\n23 Q. That's not reflected on your chart either, is it,\n24 Mr. Hinton?\n25 A. That's correct.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 MR. KAMARAJU: No further questions at this time, your\n2 Honor.\n3 THE COURT: Redirect.\n4 MS. MURRAY: Thank you, your Honor.\n5 REDIRECT EXAMINATION\n6 BY MS. MURRAY:\n7 Q. Mr. Hinton, you were asked some questions on\n8 cross-examination about some of the transactions reflected on\n9 slide 8 of Z26.\n10 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if we could please pull that\n11 up.\n12 Q. In particular, you were asked about certain of the\n13 transactions reflected going into and out of the ACA Capital\n14 account depicted here. Do you recall those questions?\n15 A. I do.\n16 Q. And Mr. Hinton, the government asked you to conduct a check\n17 of summary charts that it directed; is that correct?\n18 A. That's correct.\n19 Q. Is it accurate that the government did not ask that you do\n20 a detailed flow-of-funds analysis for the various accounts that\n21 are reflected here?\n22 A. That's correct.\n23 Q. Or a flow-of-funds analysis for any of the bank records\n24 that the government had provided to Brattle in the course of\n25 this case?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 A. That's correct.\n2 Q. Looking at the outflows from the ACA Capital account, those\n3 numbers flowing out to the various different entities' bank\n4 accounts, are those accurate?\n5 A. They are.\n6 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if we could now go to slide\n7 12, please.\n8 Q. There is a subset, kind of a zoom-in view of the prior\n9 chart; is that correct?\n10 A. That's correct.\n11 Q. So for example, the flows, the collective flows of\n12 $29 million from the ACA Capital account to these Lamp Capital\n13 accounts, that's accurate based on the records, correct?\n14 A. Yes, we verified those transactions into the Lamp Capital\n15 accounts are reflected in the underlying source documents.\n16 MS. MURRAY: And then Ms. Loftus, next slide, please.\n17 Q. And these expenses, these transactions reflected here then\n18 from those Lamp Capital accounts out to these different\n19 expenses, these are accurate as well, right, Mr. Hinton?\n20 A. That's correct.\n21 Q. Including luxury car-related expenses depicted in red here?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Including yacht-related expenses depicted in blue here?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Including aircraft-related expenses depicted in the black\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 here?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. And including, for example, $20 million going to a Swiss\n4 bank account held in the name of Qiang Guo depicted on the\n5 right here?\n6 A. That's correct.\n7 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if we could go to slide 15 of\n8 this exhibit, please.\n9 Q. Mr. Hinton, Mr. Kamaraju asked you some questions about the\n10 different boxes that are depicted on this summary chart. Do\n11 you recall those questions?\n12 A. I do.\n13 Q. In particular, for example, he asked you whether the\n14 government had requested that the Crane Advisory Group boxes on\n15 the right, in the light blue, be reflected in separate boxes\n16 rather than aggregated into one. Do you remember that?\n17 A. I do.\n18 Q. Looking at those Crane Advisory Group boxes, let's start on\n19 the top left. What bank account does that reflect?\n20 A. The top left is a Citibank account, Crane Advisory account,\n21 5278.\n22 Q. And then tracing to the right, what bank does the next one,\n23 the 5522 account, reflect?\n24 A. It's at Signature Bank, 5522.\n25 Q. Going right again, what bank is reflected by the third box?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 A. It's a different bank again; it's Capital One, 0887.\n2 Q. Let's go now, middle at the left, there are a series of MSS\n3 accounts. What banks are those accounts in the name of Crane\n4 Advisory Group held?\n5 A. Morgan Stanley accounts. There's four of them.\n6 Q. To the right here, IDB, what bank does that represent?\n7 A. I think it's an Israel Deposit Bank.\n8 Q. So these five different boxes on this summary chart, is it\n9 correct that those represent accounts held at five different\n10 banks in the name of Crane Advisory Group?\n11 A. It does.\n12 Q. And the flow of funds depicted among and between those\n13 accounts reflected on this chart, those are accurate, correct?\n14 A. They are.\n15 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if we could go to the same\n16 exhibit, and let's go to slide 4, please.\n17 Q. Mr. Hinton, you were asked some questions about time\n18 periods reflected on various of the summary charts. Do you\n19 recall that?\n20 A. I do recall.\n21 Q. In particular, with respect to this slide, Mr. Kamaraju\n22 asked you whether expanding a time period would account for a\n23 larger amount of funds shown on a summary; is that correct?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Now, Mr. Hinton, these summary charts that we've been going\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 through, these only reflect certain of the processed\n2 transactions that Brattle had been given bank records for; is\n3 that right?\n4 A. That's correct.\n5 Q. And the government selected what information, if any, to\n6 include in these summary charts?\n7 A. That's correct.\n8 Q. And I believe you testified, sir, that the summary charts\n9 were underinclusive of transactions based on the bank records,\n10 even just the bank records that Brattle processed; is that\n11 right?\n12 A. That's correct.\n13 Q. So looking here at the GTV/VOG Overview, and I'm going to\n14 ask you, sir, to do a little bit of quick and dirty math on the\n15 spot.\n16 So we have 286.9 million going to Saraca. Do you see\n17 that?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. If we add the approximately 29.6 million on the right and\n20 the 72.9 million on the left——and you may approximate——can you\n21 let me know what the total aggregate amount would be for\n22 GTV/VOG.\n23 A. Yes. Well, adding the approximately 30 million to the 286,\n24 that would get you 316, and then adding 73 would get you to\n25 403.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 Q. Try it one more time.\n2 A. Sorry. 309. Yeah, 309 or 310 million. Sorry.\n3 410 million.\n4 Q. Let's break it down one more time. And again, I'm sorry to\n5 put you on the spot.\n6 So the 286 plus the 30 million or so gets us to 316;\n7 is that right?\n8 A. Yeah.\n9 MR. KAMARAJU: Objection. Asked and answered.\n10 A. Yeah, 316, and then 72 onto 316 is 400——406.\n11 THE COURT: Overruled.\n12 Q. So fair to say approximately 400 million or so, give or\n13 take?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, can you please put up\n16 alongside this Government Exhibit Stip 19.\n17 Q. Mr. Hinton, have you seen this exhibit before, on the\n18 right?\n19 A. On the right, no.\n20 Q. This is a stipulation between the parties that, if called\n21 to testify, an employee of the SEC, or Securities and Exchange\n22 Commission, would state the following, among other things:\n23 MS. MURRAY: And going to page 2 of Stip 19, please,\n24 Ms. Loftus.\n25 Q. If you could read the first sentence in paragraph 3 there,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 please, Mr. Hinton.\n2 A. Pursuant to the agreement——\n3 Q. I'm sorry. If you could just read slowly and read each of\n4 the words in that text.\n5 A. Certainly. \"Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, Saraca,\n6 GTV, and VOG have sent to the SEC $455,211,346.39 related to\n7 the GTV Private Placement, including $69,713,578.6 from\n8 Saraca's investment in Hayman Capital Management.\"\n9 Q. And you can stop there for a moment.\n10 And then going to the next sentence, \"As of the date\n11 of this Stipulation,\" can you please read that portion as well.\n12 A. \"As of the date of this Stipulation, Saraca and GTV\n13 together (on a joint and several basis) owe an additional\n14 $31,488,392.52 to the SEC, and VOG owes an additional $45,324\n15 to the SEC.\"\n16 Q. Now, Mr. Hinton, the entity names reflected in the\n17 stipulation on the right, are those the same entity names we\n18 see in the summary chart on the left?\n19 A. They are.\n20 Q. So that's VOG, GTV, Saraca?\n21 A. Yeah. I mean, Hayman Capital is not mentioned, but the\n22 others are.\n23 Q. Understood. And in the summary chart, which reflects a\n24 subset of the bank records that Brattle was provided, I think\n25 we said the aggregate amount for this overview of GTV/VOG\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 Sources of Funds was approximately 400 million; is that right?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. The initial amount in the stipulation on the right, what's\n4 the approximate amount of that, in the second line?\n5 A. 455 million.\n6 Q. Plus there's an additional amount in the second to last\n7 line. What is that amount?\n8 A. 31 million.\n9 Q. Is 480 million more than 400 million?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 MS. MURRAY: All right. Ms. Loftus, we can take down\n12 Stip 19.\n13 We could go to slide 27 of Z26.\n14 Q. Mr. Hinton, you were also asked various questions about\n15 some of the date ranges reflected on this Himalaya Exchange\n16 flow slide. Do you recall those questions?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. In particular, Mr. Kamaraju pulled up a document and he\n19 indicated to you that the launch date of the exchange was\n20 November of 2021. Do you recall that?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. And then pointed to some of the flows here that included an\n23 earlier time period, and in particular, if we're looking at the\n24 Sources of Funds, the 473.8 million begins on the summary chart\n25 on June 2, 2021, right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 A. Yes.\n2 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if we could pull up\n3 Government Exhibit Z9, and go to page 93.\n4 Q. Mr. Hinton, what is the date in the leftmost column on this\n5 Government Exhibit?\n6 A. May 20, 2021.\n7 MS. MURRAY: And if we could zoom in on the top\n8 portion, Ms. Loftus, through to the end of the second\n9 paragraph.\n10 Q. Mr. Hinton, there's a bracket with a date and then some\n11 text in bold on the top of the screenshot. Can you please read\n12 that.\n13 A. \"[May 20, 2021] Miles Guo's Gettr (3rd).\"\n14 Q. All right. And let's read the first paragraph here,\n15 starting with, \"There is another issue.\" Can you read that\n16 carefully please for the jury.\n17 A. \"There is another issue I want to mention to my brothers\n18 and sisters. I want to reiterate that all those who have\n19 bought G-Club membership cards must hurry up and finish a\n20 series of actions, including KYC and reconciliation, as quickly\n21 as you can. This is a race against time. I don't want to talk\n22 about other things anymore.\"\n23 Q. All right. And then let's go to the next paragraph. You\n24 could start the beginning of that paragraph.\n25 MS. MURRAY: And Ms. Loftus, I may ask you to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 highlight some of the text as we go.\n2 Q. But go ahead, Mr. Hinton.\n3 A. \"More importantly, fellow fighters who want to buy Himalaya\n4 Coins and Himalaya Dollars must complete their KYC carefully\n5 and thoughtfully. Read the instructions carefully, contact the\n6 Himalaya farms if you need help. You must not waste any time\n7 completing your KYC.\"\n8 Q. If you could pause there, please, Mr. Hinton.\n9 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if you could highlight those\n10 two points, the text at the beginning, \"buy Himalaya Coins\"\n11 through to \"Dollars.\" And then the sentence, \"You must not.\"\n12 Q. And Mr. Hinton, again, looking at the left, with respect to\n13 the text that's written here, \"You must not waste any time,\" on\n14 what date was this summary posted online, according to this\n15 exhibit?\n16 A. May 20, 2021.\n17 Q. And then let's go just to the last couple of lines here.\n18 MS. MURRAY: Ms. Loftus, if you could highlight\n19 starting with, \"please try your best,\" the third to last line,\n20 through to the end.\n21 Q. Can you read that, please, Mr. Hinton.\n22 A. \"Please try your best to pay with the Himalaya Dollar (HDO)\n23 account that you will get after you have passed KYC. Soon you\n24 can buy G Fashion products through your HDO account.\"\n25 MS. MURRAY: Thank you, Ms. Loftus. You can take that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 down.\n2 Q. Mr. Hinton, Mr. Kamaraju also asked you some questions\n3 about whether the information reflected in your summary charts\n4 is helpful to Miles Guo. Do you recall those questions?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. Do you know what's helpful to Miles Guo?\n7 A. I do not.\n8 Q. Do you know what's helpful to the government?\n9 A. I do not.\n10 Q. Do you know any of the government's other witnesses in this\n11 case?\n12 A. I do not.\n13 Q. Do you know any of the government's other evidence other\n14 than materials that the government has provided to you for\n15 purposes of Brattle's work in this case?\n16 A. I do not.\n17 Q. Have you been told anything about the underlying facts of\n18 this case by the government?\n19 A. I have not.\n20 MS. MURRAY: May I have a moment, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: Okay.\n22 MS. MURRAY: I'm not sure if we have this, Ms. Loftus.\n23 If not, I might request the defense pull up Defense\n24 Exhibit 10339.\n25 MR. KAMARAJU: Jorge, do you mind pulling that up.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 MS. MURRAY: And we can go page 29.\n2 BY MS. MURRAY:\n3 Q. Mr. Hinton, this is one of the documents that Mr. Kamaraju\n4 asked you about on cross-examination.\n5 MS. MURRAY: Sorry. Maybe it's a couple of pages\n6 past. It was the $3 million transaction that Mr. Kamaraju\n7 inquired about.\n8 Sorry. Page 89, please. Thank you.\n9 All right. And if we could zoom in on the bottom\n10 portion. There are a couple of entries for August 8. Thank\n11 you.\n12 BY MS. MURRAY:\n13 Q. Mr. Hinton, you were asked questions about this $3 million,\n14 the first funds transfer that's depicted here. Do you recall\n15 those questions?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. And that's a wire from ACA Capital Group; is that correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. A wire into this Golden Spring account, right?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Do you then see two lines down that there is a debit or an\n22 outgoing transaction from the same Golden Spring account?\n23 A. I do.\n24 Q. And what is the amount of that transaction?\n25 A. It's also $3 million.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Redirect\n1 Q. And is that the same day that the $3 million came in from\n2 the ACA Capital Group?\n3 A. Yes, it is.\n4 MS. MURRAY: Thank you so much. I appreciate it. We\n5 can take that down.\n6 Ms. Loftus, let's puts up Z26. And let's go to\n7 page 33.\n8 Q. Mr. Hinton, this is kind of the high-level summary of the\n9 flow of funds contained within this summary exhibit; is that\n10 correct?\n11 A. It is.\n12 Q. And looking at the Himalaya Exchange category the\n13 government identified, what is the amount of Sources of Funds\n14 into the Himalaya Exchange account based on the processed\n15 accounts that Brattle looked at here?\n16 A. Yeah, grouping all of the Himalaya accounts together, the\n17 total is 517 million of inflows from Sources of Funds.\n18 Q. Mr. Hinton, are you aware that the government seized\n19 approximately $640 million from bank accounts that were held in\n20 the name of the Himalaya Exchange or entities that controlled\n21 it, including Hamilton?\n22 A. No.\n23 Q. And 640 million is more than 517 million, correct?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 MS. MURRAY: We can take that down. Thank you.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Hinton - Recross\n1 Q. Finally, Mr. Hinton, are you aware that Miles Guo filed for\n2 bankruptcy in 2022?\n3 A. No.\n4 Q. Are you aware that he reported that he had less than\n5 approximately $500,000 in assets?\n6 A. I do not.\n7 Q. Are you aware that he——withdrawn.\n8 Are you aware that G|CLUBS purchased a mansion in New\n9 Jersey for approximately $24.5 million, of the funds that were\n10 analyzed during the flow of funds reflected on these summary\n11 charts?\n12 MR. KAMARAJU: Object to form.\n13 A. I have seen——\n14 THE COURT: Can you break that down.\n15 MS. MURRAY: Sure.\n16 Q. In the course of reviewing bank records, Mr. Hinton, did\n17 those include bank records relating to the transfer of\n18 $24.5 million to title services and other companies?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. And was the source of those funds G|CLUBS accounts?\n21 A. I believe so.\n22 MS. MURRAY: If I may have a moment, your Honor?\n23 THE COURT: Okay.\n24 MS. MURRAY: Thank you, Mr. Hinton.\n25 Nothing further, your Honor.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 THE COURT: Recross?\n2 MR. KAMARAJU: Very briefly, your Honor.\n3 Could I have Z26, please, slide 12.\n4 RECROSS EXAMINATION\n5 BY MR. KAMARAJU:\n6 Q. Mr. Hinton, Ms. Murray asked you about this slide on\n7 redirect, correct?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And she asked you whether you'd been asked by the\n10 government to do a——I believe the phrase was detailed\n11 flow-of-fund analysis, correct?\n12 A. I believe——I believe that's what she said.\n13 Q. Okay. Now you weren't asked to do that, right?\n14 A. That's correct.\n15 Q. And because you weren't asked to do a detailed flow-of-fund\n16 analysis, you can't say whether any part of that $77 million\n17 accounts for any part of that $13 million that goes to Lamp,\n18 right?\n19 A. Right. If you——if you wanted to know precisely how much\n20 flowed through the accounts, you'd have to do a tracing\n21 analysis.\n22 Q. And you didn't do that, right?\n23 A. I haven't done that.\n24 MR. KAMARAJU: Okay. No further questions.\n25 THE COURT: All righty. Thank you, sir. You may step\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 out.\n2 (Witness excused)\n3 THE COURT: And the prosecutor may call its next\n4 witness.\n5 MR. FINKEL: The government calls Wei Chen.\n6 (Witness sworn)\n7 THE COURT: Please state your name and spell it, and\n8 speak into the microphone.\n9 THE WITNESS: My name is Wei Chen, spelled as W-E-I,\n10 and C-H-E-N.\n11 THE COURT: So I need you to speak even louder than\n12 that so that everyone can hear you.\n13 You may inquire.\n14 MR. FINKEL: Thank you, your Honor.\n15 WEI CHEN,\n16 called as a witness by the Government,\n17 having been duly sworn, testified as follows:\n18 DIRECT EXAMINATION\n19 BY MR. FINKEL:\n20 Q. So Ms. Chen, further to what the judge was saying, you can\n21 just point the microphone directly actually at your mouth so it\n22 picks up the sound, okay? Feel free to move it. You can move\n23 that top piece so it's pointed directly at your mouth. Thank\n24 you.\n25 Ms. Chen, where were you born?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. I was born in China.\n2 Q. And when did you come to the United States?\n3 A. I came to the United States in 2007.\n4 Q. Why did you come to the United States?\n5 A. For a master degree.\n6 Q. Did you obtain a master's degree?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. In what?\n9 A. Master of business administration.\n10 Q. What state do you live in now?\n11 A. Virginia.\n12 Q. What do you do for work?\n13 A. I work in a bank. I help the bank manage the risk,\n14 including operational risk, financial risk, and reputational\n15 risk.\n16 MS. SHROFF: I'm sorry. I didn't catch the last one.\n17 MR. FINKEL: Reputational risk.\n18 Q. Ms. Chen, were you ever a follower of Miles Guo?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. Are you a follower of Miles Guo today?\n21 A. No.\n22 Q. Why not?\n23 A. Because he's a liar; he's a fraudster.\n24 Q. Ms. Chen, when did you first learn about Miles Guo?\n25 A. In 2007.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. 2007?\n2 A. Sorry. 2017.\n3 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, could we approach for a\n4 moment.\n5 THE COURT: All right.\n6 (Continued on next page)\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 (At the sidebar)\n2 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, I'm hearing a tremendous\n3 amount of scoffing and cackling from the gallery, more than\n4 normal. I don't know why that is, but it's not appropriate.\n5 And I don't want to do this in public, in front of everyone,\n6 but at some point I'd ask the Court to just remind the gallery\n7 to settle down.\n8 THE COURT: I have heard the same thing, and I'm going\n9 to tell them to stop vocalizing.\n10 MR. FINKEL: Thank you.\n11 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, is the Court planning to tell\n12 them in front of the jury? I would——\n13 THE COURT: The jury is sitting here listening to them\n14 make remarks and laugh and ridicule.\n15 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, I just walked in. I have not\n16 been here all morning. So I was not focused——I actually\n17 couldn't see the person so I was trying to get that thing down,\n18 but——\n19 MR. FINKEL: It's happened throughout this trial.\n20 It's never been a big deal. This is to a different degree.\n21 That's why I wanted to tell your Honor.\n22 THE COURT: Yes. I am going to let them know that\n23 right now. I have been very upset with the way that some\n24 individuals have been chatting and making faces. Some have\n25 even come in with sunglasses on. So I am going to say\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 something now.\n2 (In open court)\n3 THE COURT: I'm now addressing myself to those of you\n4 who are sitting in the gallery, in the audience, on the\n5 benches. I do not want to hear laughing or any chatter. If\n6 you cannot be quiet, you will have to leave.\n7 Please go ahead.\n8 MR. FINKEL: Thank you, your Honor.\n9 BY MR. FINKEL:\n10 Q. Ms. Chen, you said you first learned about Miles Guo in\n11 2017. How did you first learn about Miles Guo?\n12 A. My husband was listening to his YouTube videos and\n13 introduced him to me.\n14 Q. And did you yourself start listening to Miles Guo's YouTube\n15 videos?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. And when did you start watching Miles Guo's videos?\n18 A. About end of 2018 or beginning of 2019, around that time\n19 period.\n20 Q. And in that time period, 2018 to 2019, what, generally\n21 speaking, was Miles Guo's message?\n22 A. He was talking about bringing American values to China.\n23 MS. SHROFF: Objection, your Honor. I think she can\n24 only testify to her understanding of Mr. Guo's message.\n25 THE COURT: She can testify as to what he stated.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 You may continue.\n2 BY MR. FINKEL:\n3 Q. Let me reask the question. Ms. Chen, when you started\n4 watching Miles Guo's videos, what was his message in 2018,\n5 2019?\n6 A. My understanding, the messaging I take away is bringing\n7 American values to China.\n8 Q. Did you agree with that message?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. I want to direct your attention, Ms. Chen, to June of 2020.\n11 Around that time did Miles Guo mention something called the GTV\n12 Private Placement?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And did you invest in the GTV Private Placement?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. Approximately how much money?\n17 A. At the very beginning, approximately $200,000.\n18 Q. What did Miles Guo say, if anything, that caused you to\n19 invest at that time, around June 2020, in the GTV Private\n20 Placement?\n21 A. Miles Guo promoted it as a very rare opportunity. He\n22 promoted it as a prepublic offering, that the followers can buy\n23 at $8 a share, and then when it goes to the public, the value\n24 would go up to ten or hundred, even a thousand. So have very\n25 large returns. He also said the GTV investment is because the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 GTV business would have a bright future. It would be better\n2 than YouTube, Amazon. It is not just a social media platform,\n3 it would also allow connections, like you can buy things from\n4 Amazon.com or eBay.com. It is going to be a very powerful\n5 platform. It's going to be successful. They're going to have\n6 huge returns.\n7 Q. Around that time, Ms. Chen, did Miles Guo say anything\n8 about whether it was risky or not risky to invest in the GTV\n9 Private Placement?\n10 A. Not at all. Only returns, huge returns, zero risk.\n11 Q. That's what Miles Guo said?\n12 A. That's exactly right.\n13 Q. And Ms. Chen, when you decided to invest in the GTV Private\n14 Placement, what was your understanding, based on what Miles Guo\n15 said, about how that money that you invested would be used?\n16 A. My understanding is that the money will be used to develop\n17 and grow GTV business, including acquiring the software,\n18 building of the structure to make the business successful, to\n19 be a competitor like YouTube, Amazon, eBay, and so on.\n20 Q. Ms. Chen, prior to your decision to invest in the GTV\n21 Private Placement, had you invested very much in the stock\n22 market?\n23 A. No. I don't do risky investment.\n24 Q. Why did you decide to invest in the GTV Private Placement\n25 if you don't normally invest in stocks?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. Because——\n2 MS. SHROFF: Objection. That is not what she said.\n3 MR. FINKEL: It's a question.\n4 Q. Why did you decide to invest in the GTV Private Placement\n5 if you don't normally invest in stocks?\n6 MS. SHROFF: She didn't say——\n7 THE COURT: She didn't mention stocks specifically.\n8 MS. SHROFF: Yes, she did, and she said she doesn't\n9 invest in risky stock.\n10 THE COURT: Correct.\n11 A. I can clarify.\n12 Q. Let me ask the question, if I can.\n13 Ms. Chen, why did you decide to invest in the GTV\n14 Private Placement if you don't generally invest in risky\n15 stocks?\n16 A. Because there's no risk. And I want to clarify. In my\n17 opinion, stock is a risky investment, so I don't invest in\n18 stock.\n19 MR. FINKEL: We can pull up what's in evidence as\n20 GX VK5.\n21 Q. Ms. Chen, prior to investing in the GTV Private Placement——\n22 A. Sorry. I don't see anything showing up.\n23 Q. I know. I'm asking a question.\n24 A. Oh, okay.\n25 Q. Okay. It should be on everyone's screen now.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. Yeah, I see it now.\n2 Q. Have you seen this document before, Ms. Chen?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. Did you see this document before you invested in the GTV\n5 Private Placement?\n6 A. Yes, I did.\n7 Q. Did you review it?\n8 A. Yes, I did.\n9 Q. By the way, how did you get this document?\n10 A. Miles Guo sent a link to this document to my husband via\n11 the WhatsApp chat.\n12 Q. After you reviewed——well, withdrawn.\n13 MR. FINKEL: We could turn to page 10.\n14 Q. Do you see where it says 4. Use of Proceeds?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. What was your understanding, after reviewing this Use of\n17 Proceeds, how money invested in the GTV Private Placement would\n18 be used?\n19 A. It would be used according to the chart here, of the\n20 percentage of the money to those activities as outlined in\n21 page 10.\n22 Q. And do you see where it says Other, approximately\n23 5 percent?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. What was your understanding of what Other meant?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. My understanding is some overhead costs, administrative, HR\n2 hiring.\n3 MR. FINKEL: If we can go to page 15.\n4 Q. Ms. Chen, when you were considering investing in GTV, what\n5 was your understanding of what the G in GTV stood for?\n6 A. My understanding was that's Guo TV.\n7 Q. And when you were considering whether to invest in the GTV\n8 Private Placement, what was your understanding of what——well,\n9 withdrawn.\n10 Do you see at the bottom where it says 6.3 Sponsor and\n11 Adviser of GTV Media?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. Can you read what it says.\n14 A. \"The Sponsor and Adviser of GTV Media, Mr. Wengui Guo\n15 (a/k/a Miles Guo, Ho Wan Kwok or Miles Kwok), is a billionaire,\n16 a successful businessman, and a dissident in China.\"\n17 Q. You can stop there. Ms. Chen, it says here that Mr. Guo is\n18 a billionaire. What factor, if any, did Miles Guo's claims of\n19 wealth influence your decision to invest in the GTV Private\n20 Placement?\n21 A. It played a critical influence in my decision. That made\n22 me believe that he is a wealthy person and he has resources,\n23 and he emphasized about institutional investors investing GTV;\n24 that will make it successful.\n25 Q. It says here, Ms. Chen, that Mr. Guo is the sponsor and\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 adviser of GTV Media. That's what it says in this document.\n2 Based on your review of broadcasts that Mr. Guo had made, what\n3 was your understanding of Guo's role, if any, with GTV?\n4 A. My understanding of his role is he owns it, he controls it,\n5 and he created it.\n6 Q. And that's based on the broadcasts you watched.\n7 A. Yes.\n8 MR. FINKEL: If we can go to page 18.\n9 Or actually——excuse me——let's go to page 13.\n10 Page 12.\n11 Q. Okay. You see where it says Executive Directors?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. What's the name of the first executive director listed?\n14 A. Yvette Wang.\n15 MR. FINKEL: Could we go to the next page, please.\n16 Q. And what's the name of the next executive director listed?\n17 A. Max Krasner.\n18 Q. At the time you were considering whether to invest in GTV,\n19 did you have an understanding of what the relationship was, if\n20 any, between Miles Guo and Max Krasner?\n21 A. No, I have no idea.\n22 MR. FINKEL: Okay. Could we go to page 15,\n23 Ms. Loftus.\n24 Q. Can you read who's listed as nonexecutive directors.\n25 A. Darren Blanton and Aaron Mitchell.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 MR. FINKEL: If we could go back one page to 14,\n2 please, Ms. Loftus.\n3 Q. And can you read the nonexecutive directors listed here.\n4 A. Steve Bannon, Kyle Bass.\n5 MR. FINKEL: If we can go, please, to page 17.\n6 Q. Ms. Chen, at the time that you invested in the GTV Private\n7 Placement, what was your understanding about whether or not you\n8 and your husband were an accredited investor?\n9 A. My understanding is we met the accredited investor\n10 requirements, and qualified for it.\n11 Q. And as a result——well, withdrawn.\n12 MR. FINKEL: Could we go to the next page, please,\n13 Ms. Loftus.\n14 Q. So you see where it says Risk Factors at the bottom?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 MR. FINKEL: Can you flip through that, please,\n17 Ms. Loftus.\n18 Q. Did you review those risk factors before you invested in\n19 GTV?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And what impact, if any, did the risk factors have on your\n22 decision to invest?\n23 A. Not any impact.\n24 Q. Why not?\n25 A. Because in my view back then, those were standard language\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 and that I trusted what Miles Guo said in the video, there are\n2 no risk, only huge returns.\n3 THE COURT: What do you mean by \"standard language\"?\n4 THE WITNESS: Like in a legal document, it oftentimes\n5 would have the language talk about risk.\n6 MR. FINKEL: We can take that down, Ms. Loftus.\n7 Q. What was more important to you, the memo that we just\n8 looked at or what Miles Guo said in his videos?\n9 A. What's more important to me?\n10 Q. When you were considering whether to invest in the GTV\n11 Private Placement, what was more important, the memo we just\n12 looked at or what Miles Guo said in his videos?\n13 A. Miles Guo said in his videos.\n14 Q. Why?\n15 A. Because I trusted him, I trusted what he said, I trusted\n16 that he is a wealthy person, and I trusted that he's a\n17 trustworthy person. I trusted what he said, that I am just his\n18 sisters, he want me to be rich. I trusted that he never lied,\n19 he's a very truthful person, so I trusted every single word he\n20 said about GTV investment.\n21 Q. Ms. Chen, if you had known that the money you sent for the\n22 GTV Private Placement would be used as part of a\n23 hundred-million-dollar investment in a hedge fund in the name\n24 of Miles Guo's son, would you have sent any money to GTV?\n25 A. No, absolutely not.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. If you had known that your investment wasn't guaranteed\n2 despite what Miles Guo said in his videos, would you have sent\n3 any money to GTV?\n4 A. No, absolutely not.\n5 Q. Did you receive any stock certificates?\n6 A. I was able to log in to a website to be able to pay for two\n7 papers that would have the share amounts on the paper.\n8 Q. And did you order those papers?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. How much did they cost?\n11 A. A hundred dollars.\n12 Q. Where exactly did you send your GTV——well, how much money\n13 did you invest in the GTV Private Placement?\n14 A. Close to $200,000.\n15 Q. And to what entity did you send that money to?\n16 A. Saraca Media.\n17 Q. What instructions did you——well, how did you know to send\n18 to Saraca Media?\n19 A. Because Miles Guo sent a document link to my husband\n20 through the WhatsApp chat, and when we click the web app——or\n21 the link, it takes you to a document that has wire instruction\n22 information.\n23 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, may I approach the witness.\n24 THE COURT: Yes.\n25 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, I've handed Ms. Chen a binder\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 which contains the following documents in the VB series: 14,\n2 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, and 33.\n3 Q. Ms. Chen, can you please flip through that binder and let\n4 me know when you're done.\n5 A. Yes, I did.\n6 Q. Do you recognize the documents in that binder?\n7 A. Yes, I do.\n8 Q. What are they?\n9 A. Those are the documents I provided.\n10 Q. And what do those documents relate to?\n11 A. Related to Miles Guo's fraud scam.\n12 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Loftus, if we can pull up Stip 21.\n13 Your Honor, the government offers the stipulation into\n14 evidence, Stip 21.\n15 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n16 (Government's Exhibit Stip 21 received in evidence)\n17 MR. FINKEL: Stip 21 reads, \"It is hereby stipulated\n18 and agreed——\"\n19 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, could Mr. Finkel slow down\n20 because I think the translator is having trouble.\n21 MR. FINKEL: I'm happy to slow down.\n22 THE INTERPRETER: Thank you.\n23 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n24 MR. FINKEL: \"It is hereby stipulated and agreed by\n25 the parties: In the below chart, the exhibit listed under\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Column A contains text, audio, or video in a foreign language.\n2 \"In the below chart, the exhibit listed under column B\n3 and their subparts is a true and accurate translation of the\n4 audio or text contained in the exhibit and their subparts\n5 listed under column A.\"\n6 And if we can go to the next page, please, Ms. Loftus.\n7 And in column A, there is listed VB24, 13, 10, 27, and\n8 24T, 13T, 10T, 27T.\n9 Your Honor, at this time the government offers the\n10 documents in the binder, which are VB13, 14, 24, 26, 27, 29,\n11 31, 33, and their corresponding translations as stipulated to\n12 by the parties, which are VB24-T, 13-T, 10-T, 27-T.\n13 THE COURT: They are admitted.\n14 (Government's Exhibits VB13, VB14, VB24, VB26, VB27,\n15 VB29, VB31, VB33 received in evidence)\n16 (Government's Exhibits VB10-T, VB13-T, VB24-T, VB27-T\n17 received in evidence)\n18 MR. FINKEL: We can take that down, Ms. Loftus.\n19 BY MR. FINKEL:\n20 Q. Ms. Chen, when did you first learn about something called\n21 G|CLUBS?\n22 A. I first learned about it in around about——around about\n23 October 2020.\n24 Q. And at first, Ms. Chen, what did Miles Guo say, if\n25 anything, about G|CLUBS?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. If I remember, I think he talk about it as a membership.\n2 Q. Did you send money for a G|CLUBS membership?\n3 A. No, never ever.\n4 Q. Did you send money to a company called Crane?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. Why did you send money to a company called Crane?\n7 A. Because Miles Guo promoted opportunities to add more GTV\n8 share, and in order to do so, Miles Guo asked us to contact the\n9 farm to complete investment into additional GTV share. So we\n10 contacted the MOS farm and was given a bank account of Crane.\n11 Q. What's MOS?\n12 A. Mountains of Spice Farm.\n13 Q. And what was your understanding of who the leader of the\n14 Mountains of Spice Farm is?\n15 A. Back then it was Lo——\n16 MS. SHROFF: Are you asking who the leader is now or\n17 in what year?\n18 Q. What is your understanding of——yeah, what is your\n19 understanding of who the Mountains of Spices leader is,\n20 Ms. Chen?\n21 MS. SHROFF: Same objection.\n22 THE COURT: Are you asking is or was?\n23 MR. FINKEL: Well, I think it's the same, but——\n24 Q. At the time that you were considering sending money to\n25 Crane, who was the leader of the Mountains of Spice farm?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. Back then it was Long Island Brother.\n2 Q. Did you see Long Island Brother and Miles Guo appear\n3 together in videos?\n4 A. Yes, all the time.\n5 Q. What is a farm?\n6 A. The farm, in my opinion, is the entity that Miles Guo asked\n7 people to form to help the followers to join the farm to\n8 complete the investment.\n9 Q. At the time you were considering, Ms. Chen, sending money\n10 to Crane for additional GTV shares, what was Miles Guo saying,\n11 if anything, in his videos about the value of GTV?\n12 A. Miles Guo said he had independent valuation company did a\n13 valuation of the GTV business, it has already been——it has\n14 already been appreciated. I don't remember the exact how many\n15 times, maybe ten times or so, but it is high enough to attract\n16 me to send more money for additional GTV shares.\n17 Q. And did Miles Guo explain why, in order to get additional\n18 GTV shares, you had to go through the farms and Crane instead\n19 of just sending it to Saraca as you had previously done?\n20 A. I don't recall he did so.\n21 MR. FINKEL: If we can pull up what's in evidence, on\n22 the left side, VB24, and on the right side, VB24-T.\n23 All right. And as stipulated by the parties, the\n24 translations are on the right side of the screen.\n25 Q. Ms. Chen, do you recognize the document that's on the left\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 side of the screen?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. And it says at the top, Crane. Do you see that?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. All right. Where is this document from; what entity?\n6 A. This document was provided to us by the MOS Farm volunteer.\n7 I don't know where it's coming from, but it's sent to us\n8 through Discord chat by an MOS volunteer.\n9 Q. What's Discord?\n10 A. Discord is a social media platform that the farm and the\n11 Himalaya Alliance are using to gather followers.\n12 MR. FINKEL: Could we go to the next page of each of\n13 these, please, Ms. Loftus.\n14 Q. And so Ms. Chen, what was your understanding of what this\n15 document was, VB24?\n16 A. When we signed this document, we thought, this is the\n17 document that is required to complete this investment.\n18 Q. And this particular document on the screen, is this the\n19 document you signed?\n20 A. My husband signed it.\n21 Q. What is the red text at the top? What is your\n22 understanding of what the red text at the top is?\n23 A. The red text top says to the G Club customer, meaning the\n24 person who made the payment, and put a name on there.\n25 Q. Were these instructions that the farm provided through the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Discord channel?\n2 MS. SHROFF: Objection. The farm did not provide\n3 instructions. The farm provided a document.\n4 THE COURT: Sustained.\n5 Q. Was it your understanding that this document provided by\n6 the farm were instructions on how to process the payment to\n7 Crane?\n8 A. Yes, that's my understanding.\n9 MR. FINKEL: We can pull up, please, VB26.\n10 Q. Whose name is at the top of this document?\n11 A. My name.\n12 Q. And it says below that G|CLUBS reference number. Do you\n13 see that?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. What is that number for?\n16 A. That's a number that my husband obtained when he created an\n17 order on the G|CLUBS website.\n18 Q. And Ms. Chen, what was your understanding, if any, about\n19 the relationship between G|CLUBS and these additional GTV\n20 shares that you wanted to purchase?\n21 A. My understanding is what Miles Guo promoted in his\n22 broadcasting video, that those G|CLUBS membership are free as a\n23 benefit, if we are buying additional GTV shares.\n24 Q. Do you see at the top it says Crane Advisory Group,\n25 Ms. Chen?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Did you in fact send money to Crane Advisory Group?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. Approximately how much?\n5 A. About a hundred thousand dollars.\n6 Q. And where did that hundred thousand dollars come from?\n7 A. The hundred thousand dollars are coming from my home\n8 equity.\n9 Q. What do you mean by that?\n10 A. Meaning the second loan on my house.\n11 Q. Did you get a second loan on your house for the purpose of\n12 trying to purchase additional GTV shares?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Why?\n15 A. Because I trusted Miles Guo that the GTV shares would\n16 provide huge returns, that would provide the return that\n17 offsetting the cost of borrowing from my home equity.\n18 Q. Ms. Chen, what was your understanding, if any, about how\n19 many G|CLUBS memberships you would get for the hundred thousand\n20 dollars you sent to Crane?\n21 A. My understanding is that will be two free G|CLUBS\n22 memberships of tier 5.\n23 Q. And what was that understanding based on?\n24 A. Based on what Miles Guo emphasized and repeated over and\n25 over again in his YouTube, in his broadcasting videos, that if\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 you buy GTV shares, you get G|CLUBS membership for free, and\n2 that's a benefit he's giving to his fellow followers.\n3 Q. Did you ever send money to an entity called HCHK?\n4 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Loftus, we can take that down.\n5 A. Yes.\n6 MR. FINKEL: If we can pull up what's in evidence as\n7 VB29.\n8 Q. What is this document?\n9 A. This is the wire receipt or confirmation of the money I\n10 sent to HCHK Technology.\n11 Q. And is that you and your husband's name under Debit Party?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. And how much did you send to HCHK Technologies?\n14 A. A hundred and ten thousand.\n15 Q. Why did you send 110,000 to HCHK Technologies?\n16 A. To purchase additional GTV shares.\n17 Q. And did these additional GTV shares, based on your\n18 understanding from Miles Guo's videos, come with G|CLUBS\n19 memberships as well?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. Ms. Chen, did you need multiple G|CLUBS memberships?\n22 A. No. I don't need any G|CLUBS membership because it doesn't\n23 offer anything.\n24 Q. What is HCHK Technologies?\n25 A. I have no idea what HCHK Technologies is.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. Around this time, Ms. Chen——I think this document is dated\n2 August 2021——what, if anything, was Miles Guo saying about\n3 whether there was an urgency to purchase additional GTV shares?\n4 A. The urgency is the opportunity window is closing down. If\n5 you want to get more GTV shares, you got to hurry up.\n6 Q. And this urgency that Miles Guo talked about, what impact,\n7 if any, did that have on your decision to try to purchase more\n8 GTV shares?\n9 A. That stipulated me sending to this account as soon as\n10 possible. I believe we received a bank account August 15 and\n11 we sent the money on August 16, the next day.\n12 Q. At the bottom of this document it says, REF: MOS. Do you\n13 see that?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. What does MOS stand for?\n16 A. Mountains of Spice.\n17 MR. FINKEL: We can take that down, Ms. Loftus.\n18 Q. When you were considering——did you visit the G|CLUBS\n19 website?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And what did you see?\n22 A. I see Miles Guo smoking cigar and on his yacht.\n23 Q. Did you ever get additional GTV shares for the 110,000 you\n24 sent to HCHK and the approximately hundred you sent to Crane?\n25 A. No, I don't think so.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 MR. FINKEL: If we could put up VB14, which is in\n2 evidence.\n3 If you had known, Ms. Chen, that you wouldn't receive\n4 shares for the money you sent to HCHK and the money you sent to\n5 Crane, would you have sent that money?\n6 A. Of course not.\n7 Q. What are we looking at here in VB14?\n8 A. This is my husband's G|CLUBS membership account that he was\n9 logging into his account and it showed up in his account\n10 information.\n11 Q. And did you see this account information on the computer\n12 online?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And Ms. Chen, did there come a time, if ever, where you or\n15 your husband used a G Fashion discount from your G|CLUBS\n16 membership?\n17 A. We did.\n18 Q. And how much in G Fashion clothing did you purchase,\n19 approximately?\n20 A. I paid about $2,000.\n21 Q. And what was the discount you received?\n22 A. 50 percent.\n23 Q. Ms. Chen, if you had known that all you would get for the\n24 money you sent to HCHK Technologies and Crane Advisory Group\n25 was a 50 percent discount on G Fashion items, would you have\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 sent that money?\n2 A. Sorry. Can you repeat that question again.\n3 Q. Sure. If you had known that for sending $200,000 to Crane\n4 and HCHK all you would get is a 50 percent discount on G\n5 Fashion, would you have sent that money?\n6 A. No. The 50 percent G Fashion discount is nothing. The\n7 2,000 I paid for, even after discount, is not well worth the\n8 money I paid for it.\n9 Q. Did G|CLUBS, to your knowledge, offer any hotel discounts?\n10 A. I'm not aware.\n11 Q. Did you receive anything in the mail from G|CLUBS?\n12 A. I received one time a Christmas gift.\n13 Q. What was in the Christmas gift?\n14 A. Some cookies, coffee, and a coffee mug.\n15 MR. FINKEL: You can take that down. And Ms. Loftus,\n16 if you can display, just for the witness, VB35.\n17 Q. What is this?\n18 A. That's the coffee mug I received.\n19 MR. FINKEL: Government offers VB35.\n20 MS. SHROFF: No objection, your Honor.\n21 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n22 (Government's Exhibit VB35 received in evidence)\n23 Q. Ms. Chen, if you had known that all you would receive from\n24 G|CLUBS was a coffee mug, some cookies, coffee, and the G\n25 Fashion discount, would you have sent money to HCHK and Crane?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. No.\n2 Q. Did you learn anything, or did you hear anything from\n3 G|CLUBS about a discount for an F1 race?\n4 A. No.\n5 MR. FINKEL: You can take that down.\n6 If we can pull up, please, Ms. Loftus, on the left\n7 side VB27 and on the right side, 27-T.\n8 Q. So on the right side is the stipulated translation.\n9 Ms. Chen, do you recognize the document on the left\n10 side of your screen?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Can you just describe to the jury what your understanding\n13 of what this document is.\n14 A. My understanding of this document is the form the MOS Farms\n15 asked us to complete to calculate the total of the GTV shares.\n16 Q. What do you mean the total of GTV shares?\n17 A. Because all the investments, including donations, has GTV\n18 share tied to it. Miles Guo said in the videos and emphasized\n19 all different investments plus donation would entitle the\n20 follower equivalent GTV share.\n21 Q. So what was your understanding of why there needed to be a\n22 calculation?\n23 A. Because the investments are very complex, they are\n24 different investment programs, that starting to lose track of\n25 how many investments each member have completed, so we need to\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 submit this form, including the amount and the payment receipt\n2 for the MOS Farm to verify and then calculate a total of GTV\n3 shares for each member.\n4 Q. And did you and your husband fill out this form for that\n5 purpose?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. Okay. It says here, No. 2, \"This form is for requirements\n8 for the reconstruction project.\" Do you see that, Ms. Chen?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. What is your understanding of what the reconstruction\n11 project is?\n12 A. My understanding is because of the SEC litigation, Miles\n13 Guo said about a new GTV platform, restructuring the old one,\n14 so it's called restructuring the GTV.\n15 Q. What do you mean the SEC litigation?\n16 A. My understanding back then, there was a charge by the SEC\n17 and some litigations ongoing with the GTV investment we made\n18 back in June 2020.\n19 Q. Ms. Chen, did you receive money from the SEC?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. And was that part of the Fair Fund distribution?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. What do you recall, if anything, Ms. Chen, about what Miles\n24 Guo said on his broadcasts about what people should do with the\n25 money they received from the Fair Fund from the SEC?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. Miles Guo asked people to send back the distribution of the\n2 Fair Funds to Miles Guo-related entities.\n3 Q. And did Miles Guo say anything about whether the people who\n4 received the Fair Fund distribution should do so quickly or\n5 slowly?\n6 A. Miles Guo said they should do it quickly and set a timeline\n7 of 45 days within the receipt of the Fair Fund distribution.\n8 Q. And what did Miles Guo say, if anything, about why there\n9 was a 45-day timeline?\n10 A. I don't remember exactly what he said, but my understanding\n11 is, there are Himalaya H Coin tied to the investments that are\n12 part of the Fair Funds. If you don't send back the money\n13 within the 45-day timeline, the Himalaya H Coin that is\n14 allocated to the members, based on the investment that they\n15 were able to purchase at 10 cents per coin, will be gone.\n16 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Loftus, if we can go to page 3 of\n17 these documents.\n18 Q. And looking at the English version, Ms. Chen, do you see at\n19 the bottom it says \"Apple Coin, G1, Have you successfully\n20 purchased G1 Apple Coin?\"\n21 A. Yes.\n22 Q. What was that?\n23 A. My understanding, that was an initial version of the\n24 digital coin that is available to purchase from Apple Store.\n25 Q. Had you purchased the G1 Apple Coin?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 A. No, I did not.\n2 MR. FINKEL: Okay. Could we go to the next page of\n3 each, Ms. Loftus.\n4 Q. And so is this form that we're looking at, Ms. Chen, the\n5 answers you provided to the questions on this form? \"No,\" for\n6 example, under G Dollar?\n7 A. Sorry. Can you repeat your question again.\n8 Q. Absolutely. You see where it says \"No\" under \"Did you\n9 successfully purchase G2 and not ask for a refund or already\n10 get a refund?\" Do you see that?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. That \"No,\" is that you and your husband's response?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Okay. And then for No. 4, it says, \"Old Chair. Are you an\n15 owner of an old chair?\" And you selected \"Yes\"; is that\n16 correct?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. What's an Old Chair?\n19 A. So the Old Chair, in my understanding, were the initial GTV\n20 shares investors. We were in contact directly with Miles Guo\n21 to get the wire instructions to send the money to the Saraca\n22 Media, and there was a minimum investment requirement of a\n23 hundred thousand dollars, and to meet that requirement, it is\n24 considered one of the Old Chair, and then across all the farms,\n25 there are about a total of 1300 Old Chairs.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. And that number at the bottom, the 198,700, what does that\n2 number represent?\n3 A. That number represents the money I sent to Saraca Media for\n4 a total of 90——90——yeah, for this dollar amount here.\n5 Q. Okay. Ms. Chen, did you participate in the farm loan\n6 program?\n7 A. No, I did not.\n8 MR. FINKEL: Okay. Could we go to the next page,\n9 please, Ms. Loftus.\n10 And over here——does that not work?\n11 Q. Okay. It says \"GC Order Number.\" What order number did\n12 you place there?\n13 A. This is an order number that is the same as the one we\n14 completed for that Crane compliance package, so that's a number\n15 my husband obtained after he created order at the G|CLUBS\n16 website.\n17 MR. FINKEL: Could we go to the next page, please,\n18 Ms. Loftus.\n19 Q. And so here, for No. 8, it says G Club Card, do you see\n20 that, at the bottom?\n21 A. Yes.\n22 MR. FINKEL: Okay. And Ms. Loftus, we could go to the\n23 next page.\n24 Q. And you selected \"No,\" correct?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. Okay. Why did you select \"No\"?\n2 A. Because I'm buying additional GTV shares, not purchase G\n3 Club membership.\n4 MR. FINKEL: Go to the next page, please.\n5 Q. And then for 12 it says Summary. Do you see that?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. And it says, \"Your Total Investment (USD). Total\n8 investment = G1 + G2 + Old Chair + Original VOG/Phoenix +\n9 Borrowing from Himalaya New York MOS + Borrowing from Other\n10 Farms + Actual Purchase of G Club + Frozen Amount in Other\n11 Farms + Donation Amount.\" Do you see all that?\n12 A. Yes.\n13 Q. What was your understanding of what that math equation was\n14 for?\n15 A. To calculate total GTV share.\n16 Q. And what did it mean, \"Frozen Amount in Other Farms\"; do\n17 you know?\n18 A. My understanding is there are certain farm loans called\n19 frozen by the local government, so they are defined as \"Frozen\n20 Amount in Other Farms\" outside MOS Farm.\n21 MR. FINKEL: Could we go to the next page, please,\n22 Ms. Loftus.\n23 Q. And here, for 13-2, right in the center, it says, \"Your\n24 plan for investment.\" Do you see that?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. And what did you select?\n2 A. I selected to participate in investment through card\n3 project. So the translation here is not accurate. It's not\n4 purchase card and equities. It's distribute cards and\n5 equities.\n6 MS. SHROFF: Objection. She has no qualification to\n7 translate. The document speaks for itself and the document——\n8 THE COURT: I'm going to sustain the objection.\n9 Q. What is your understanding of why you selected that third\n10 button?\n11 A. Because I read the Chinese version. In the Chinese\n12 version, it said to participate in investment through card\n13 project. In Chinese version, it means distribute card and\n14 equity shares.\n15 Q. And the other two selections, only purchase G Club card or\n16 only for investment, can you explain what you understood those\n17 options to mean.\n18 A. Yes. Those option means it's a GTV share investment, and\n19 the G Club card is a benefit provided for free, and you have\n20 the option of voluntarily giving up this benefit of free G Club\n21 membership, so therefore, the second option, meaning only GTV\n22 shares, you're giving up the free benefits of G Club\n23 membership.\n24 Q. So you thought that you were buying shares——\n25 MS. SHROFF: Objection to the leading.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6Q1GUO3 Chen - Direct\n1 MR. FINKEL: I didn't finish my question.\n2 THE COURT: He hasn't gotten to the question yet.\n3 Go ahead.\n4 Q. Ms. Chen, you sent money to HCHK and Crane, correct?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 (Continued on next page)\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 BY MR. FINKEL:\n2 Q. And what was your understanding of what you would get for\n3 sending money to those two entities?\n4 A. GTV shares.\n5 Q. Would you get anything else in addition?\n6 A. G/Club membership for free.\n7 Q. You can take that down, Ms. Loftus.\n8 Ms. Chen, did you ever join a farm?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. Which one?\n11 A. MOS farm.\n12 Q. Did you volunteer for that farm?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. What were the nature of the work you did as a volunteer for\n15 the MOS farm?\n16 A. My work was to reverify the Himalaya H Coin that was\n17 allocated to each member at ICO price at 10 cent per coin to\n18 confirm if that allocation was accurate.\n19 Q. How many hours did you spend volunteering for the MOS farm?\n20 A. On average about 40 hours a week.\n21 Q. Were you also working at this time?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. Do you have children?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. How did you find time to do all that?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 A. I don't sleep and I take vacation hour from work to do this\n2 volunteer work.\n3 Q. Why did you decide to spend so much time volunteering for\n4 the MOS farm?\n5 A. Because Miles Guo ask us to volunteer. He ask us not just\n6 invest, but also to do volunteer work. And also back then my\n7 H Coin allocation, there's a miscount of my past investment, so\n8 I had concerns of other members' investment could got miscount\n9 for the H Coin they are deserving for.\n10 I know every dollar those fellow followers sent to\n11 Miles Guo are hard earn money, and I don't want them to have\n12 the same situation as me of their hard earn money got sent to\n13 Miles Guo and they're miscounted.\n14 Q. When did you start volunteering for the MOS farm?\n15 A. In March 2022.\n16 Q. When approximately did you stop?\n17 A. March 2023.\n18 Q. Did Miles Guo say where he was located during the various\n19 videos that you watched about him talking about these\n20 investment projects?\n21 A. My understanding is the rooftop condo at the Netherland\n22 Sherry hotel in Manhattan, and also his house in Greenwich,\n23 that house he has bought long time ago.\n24 Q. Ms. Loftus, can you pull up C205 which is in evidence.\n25 While that's being pulled up, Ms. Chen, did you ever see Miles\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 Guo appear in a video with a car?\n2 A. Yes.\n3 Q. What did the car look like?\n4 A. A red color sports car.\n5 Q. What kind of car was it, do you know?\n6 A. I know it's a sports car, looks very expensive, but I don't\n7 know exact what it is.\n8 Q. What did Miles Guo say, if anything, about that car?\n9 A. That's his car.\n10 Q. Can you scroll down a little bit, Ms. Loftus.\n11 Do you recognize the individual in the sunglasses and\n12 the hat?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Who is it?\n15 A. Miles Guo.\n16 Q. Do you recognize that flag in the back?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. What is it?\n19 A. The flag of New Federal State of China.\n20 Q. Based on what Miles Guo would say in his videos, do you\n21 have an understanding of where this video was recorded from?\n22 A. My understanding this is from the rooftop condo at the\n23 Sherry Netherland, that expensive hotel in Manhattan.\n24 Q. We can take that down. What is G Bank?\n25 A. G Bank is another investment opportunity Miles Guo promoted\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 as the bank that has the digital currency license that can\n2 compliment the Himalaya Exchange to settle between digital\n3 currency and the fiat currency. It is very lucrative, and they\n4 were able to acquire it because William Je is very influential\n5 in the finance world. He has his connections to be able to\n6 allow them to purchase this G Bank successfully.\n7 Q. Did you participate in any video conferences about the G\n8 Bank?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. And was Miles Guo apart of those conferences?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. Was William Je?\n13 A. William Je attended separate Webex call from Miles Guo.\n14 Q. What, if anything, did Miles Guo about G Bank?\n15 A. Miles Guo said the G Bank is the bank that has the digital\n16 currency license. It's very rare to get digital currency\n17 license. It's going to forming the future of the H Coin\n18 Himalaya Exchange ecosystem to compliment it. It's going to be\n19 very lucrative, have a very bright future, and that is the type\n20 of assets you can passing down to your kids and your kids' kids\n21 for many generations. It's a rare opportunity that can only\n22 appear one time in your life. You will become initial\n23 shareholder of the G Bank if you make that investment.\n24 Q. Did Miles Guo mention anything about a casino in the\n25 context of the G Bank?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. What did he say about a casino?\n3 A. I don't remember clearly what he said, but I think\n4 opportunity presented at the beginning including G Bank and the\n5 casino investment, and later the casino investment didn't go\n6 through, so it dropped.\n7 MS. SHROFF: I didn't get that last part.\n8 MR. FINKEL: Didn't go through so it dropped.\n9 Q. Ms. Chen, what did Miles Guo say, if anything, about\n10 whether he was investing his own money into the G Bank?\n11 A. Miles Guo said the institutional investors have lot of\n12 money to purchase the G Bank. They have already completed the\n13 G Bank acquisition with all the money. They don't need our\n14 money at all. They have way more enough money, that our money\n15 is nothing to the institutional investors he has to acquire the\n16 G Bank.\n17 Q. Did you invest in G Bank?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. How much money did you invest into G Bank?\n20 A. $300,000.\n21 Q. To what entity did you send that $300,000?\n22 A. Hamilton Opportunity Fund.\n23 Q. You ever heard the song, Ms. Chen, H Coin to the Moon?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. Where have you heard it?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 A. I heard it on Gettr. I heard it on Apple Itunes.\n2 Q. Did you purchase it on Apple Itunes?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. How many times did you purchase H Coin to the Moon on Apple\n5 Itunes?\n6 A. About 600 or 700 times.\n7 Q. Why did you purchase it so many times?\n8 A. Because Miles Guo ask us to download many, many times of\n9 this song to boost up the ranking in the Itunes chart.\n10 Q. What do you mean to boost up the ranking in the Itunes\n11 chart?\n12 A. So that it shows the top in Itunes that everyone would know\n13 H Coin to the Moon song.\n14 Q. What did that phrase mean to you, to the moon?\n15 A. Meaning the price will go skyrocketing.\n16 Q. What did Miles Guo say, if anything, in his videos about\n17 H Coin?\n18 A. Miles Guo said H Coin is better than Bitcoin.\n19 Q. What is Bitcoin?\n20 A. Bitcoin is a very valuable cryptocurrency.\n21 Q. What did Miles Guo say H Coin was?\n22 A. A cryptocurrency.\n23 Q. Did Miles Guo mention anything about H Coin being on the\n24 blockchain?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. What did Miles Guo say, if anything, about H Coin in the\n2 blockchain?\n3 A. Miles Guo said H Coin is the most advance technology of\n4 blockchain. It's better than any current digital currency in\n5 the current markets.\n6 Q. And what impact did those statements about H Coin having\n7 the most advance blockchain technology have on you, if any?\n8 A. That influence my decision of buying H Coin, that make me\n9 believe that H Coin will be very valuable.\n10 Q. What, if anything, did Miles Guo say about whether H Coin\n11 was backed by gold?\n12 A. Miles Guo said H Coin has 20 percent gold as a reserved\n13 backup.\n14 Q. And what impact did those statements that H Coin has a 20\n15 percent gold reserve have on your consideration whether to buy\n16 H Coin?\n17 A. That is critical to me, that sold me the idea that what he\n18 promoted that H Coin is better than Bitcoin. It is going to be\n19 more valuable than Bitcoin because it has a gold reserve while\n20 Bitcoin does not.\n21 Q. What is your understanding of the association, if any,\n22 between the Himalaya Exchange and Miles Guo?\n23 A. Miles Guo created Himalaya Exchange and he owns it.\n24 Q. Did you invest in H Coin?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. Approximately how much money did you spend purchasing\n2 H Coin?\n3 A. I spent about $530,000 to purchase H Coin.\n4 Q. Why did you decide to purchase H Coin?\n5 A. Because back then Miles Guo said the H Coin will go up to\n6 $100 in a few weeks very soon.\n7 Q. Ms. Chen, if it had turned out that instead of being backed\n8 by gold H Coin was backed by dollars instead of gold, would\n9 that have mattered to you?\n10 A. Of course it matters.\n11 Q. Why?\n12 A. Because if it's only backed by dollars, not the gold, it\n13 means it's not going to be better than Bitcoin. It's not going\n14 to be that valuable. It's not going to be worth me thinking\n15 about making investment in H Coin.\n16 Q. Did Miles Guo say anything about whether investing in\n17 H Coin or H dollar was guaranteed?\n18 A. Miles Guo said about, for people like me that purchase\n19 the H Coin at the very high price, and later on the price drop\n20 to even half or less than half, Miles Guo will compensate for\n21 all their losses we incurred through the purchasing the H Coin.\n22 Q. Did you visit the Himalaya Exchange website?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. Did you see anything called white paper on the Himalaya\n25 Exchange website?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 A. I may have seen that.\n2 Q. Did you read it?\n3 A. I read it.\n4 Q. And what was your understanding of what the white paper\n5 meant?\n6 A. My takeaway from it is there are challenges out there in\n7 current cryptocurrency market.\n8 MS. SHROFF: I'm sorry. Could I have that respond\n9 read back.\n10 (Record was read)\n11 Q. What do you mean by challenges?\n12 A. Challenges about the price of the digital cryptocurrency,\n13 the challenges about the security, the current cryptocurrency\n14 are not that secured, the challenges about the cost, the\n15 current cryptocurrency are costly. So those are the challenges\n16 of the current cryptocurrency in the market, and H Coin is\n17 created to overcome all those challenges. It gone be the most\n18 secured affordable efficient currency that would be the future\n19 of all the cryptocurrency.\n20 Q. When you decided to purchase H Coin, Ms. Chen, did you\n21 think you were purchasing cryptocurrency or credits?\n22 A. I was thinking I was purchasing cryptocurrency.\n23 Q. Were the farms involved in your purchase of H Coin?\n24 A. They are involved when I purchased the H Coin at the ICO,\n25 the initial currency offering at 10 cents per coin.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. What is the H Coin lockup?\n2 A. The H Coin lockup in my understanding is the ICO of the\n3 initial currency offering at 10 cent per coin are locked up for\n4 a period of time, that the fellow followers are not allowed to\n5 sell them.\n6 Q. If we can pull up what's in evidence as VB33. Do you\n7 recognize this, Ms. Chen?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. What is it?\n10 A. That's my Himalaya Exchange account.\n11 Q. What is your understanding, if anything, of why it says\n12 130,000 HDO and zero HCN?\n13 A. That's the balance of my account.\n14 Q. What is your understanding, if any, of the difference\n15 between HDO and HCN?\n16 A. Back then my understanding that HDO is one-to-one to U.S.\n17 dollars, and HCN is the cryptocurrency.\n18 Q. And when you sent money into -- how did you send money into\n19 the Himalaya Exchange?\n20 A. I log into the account and it provide you payment\n21 instructions of the bank account to send the money, and it also\n22 include a reference number that is specifically for me to add\n23 that reference number when I wire the number to that bank\n24 account.\n25 Q. What state were you in when you logged into the Himalaya\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 Exchange to send money?\n2 A. I use the virtual private network, the VPN.\n3 MS. SHROFF: The question was what state she was in.\n4 Move to strike.\n5 THE COURT: If you can answer what state.\n6 A. I live in Virginia.\n7 Q. Were you in Virginia?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. What's a VPN?\n10 A. Virtual private network.\n11 Q. Why did you use a VPN to log into the Himalaya Exchange?\n12 A. Because Miles Guo ask us to VPN to log into Himalaya\n13 Exchange.\n14 Q. What is your understanding Miles Guo asked you to use a VPN\n15 to log into the Himalaya Exchange from the United States?\n16 A. Because my understanding is I need to log in from a country\n17 outside of US to get into the Himalaya Exchange account.\n18 Q. When you sent money to the Himalaya Exchange, did you think\n19 you were buying H dollar or H Coin?\n20 A. I send in U.S. dollars that become equivalent HDO, and I\n21 use HDO to purchase HCN.\n22 Q. You can take that down. If we can put up Z10 at page two.\n23 Ms. Chen, what did Miles Guo say, if anything, about\n24 A10?\n25 A. Miles Guo promoted another investment called A10. I don't\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 understand what it is. Miles Guo said it include five percent\n2 of Gettr and five percent of Himalaya Exchange.\n3 Q. If you can just scroll up a little bit, Ms. Loftus, just to\n4 the date.\n5 When you first learned about A10, in what manner did\n6 you first learn about A10?\n7 A. Sorry. When you ask me what matters?\n8 Q. How did you first learn about A10?\n9 A. Miles Guo broadcasting video on Gettr.\n10 Q. After learning about A10, Ms. Chen, what impact did that\n11 have on you?\n12 A. When he promoted A10, I'm confused.\n13 Q. Why?\n14 A. Because why is another investment. It feels to me that\n15 just keep asking us to give money to investment, just keep\n16 draining out our pocket, is always giving, giving, investment,\n17 investment, but where is the return? Why keeping giving money\n18 out? When is the money coming in as a return?\n19 Q. Did you invest in the A10?\n20 A. No.\n21 Q. Did you try to get your money back from the other\n22 investments that you had made from Miles Guo's videos?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. What steps did you take to try to get your money back?\n25 A. For the G Bank investment, I contacted the farm manager of\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 Hamilton Opportunity Fund David Fallon.\n2 Q. And what did David Fallon tell you, if anything?\n3 A. David Fallon did not respond. His lawyer in UK James\n4 responded to me.\n5 Q. What did James say?\n6 A. James said.\n7 MS. SHROFF: All of this is hearsay.\n8 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n9 A. Sorry.\n10 Q. You can answer, what did James said?\n11 A. Jim said your money is part of the DOJ freeze order.\n12 Q. And what response did you have to that, if anything?\n13 A. My response is, I don't believe so because I sending the\n14 money back in January 2022. The money was not frozen till\n15 September 2022. There are eight months in between the time I\n16 send in the money till the time the money is frozen. I believe\n17 there are money outflows. The money I sent to the account is\n18 no longer in that account when DOJ freeze that account.\n19 Q. Did you try to get your money back from G/Club?\n20 A. I contact G/Club for refund.\n21 Q. What did G/Club tell you?\n22 A. The G/Club customer services provided me an email address\n23 to contact the legal department of G/Club.\n24 Q. Did you contact that email address?\n25 A. I contact the email address and completed the forms that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 requested to cancel the G/Club membership.\n2 Q. What did G/Club tell you, if anything?\n3 A. G/Club legal team did not respond to my request at all.\n4 Q. Did you contact anyone else trying to get your money back?\n5 A. I contacted Mulan to ask about the G Bank investment.\n6 Q. What did Mulan tell you?\n7 A. Mulan told me that my money is frozen as part of the DOJ\n8 order.\n9 Q. Did you try to redeem and get cash out of the Himalaya\n10 Exchange?\n11 A. Yes.\n12 Q. What happened then?\n13 A. I request a redemption I believe back in May 2023, and two\n14 months later I receive a notice that the request is canceled,\n15 no more redemption.\n16 Q. You can take that down, Ms. Loftus.\n17 Ms. Chen, did Miles Guo ever talk in his videos about\n18 being targeted by the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP?\n19 A. Yes.\n20 Q. What, if anything, would he say about being targeted by the\n21 CCP?\n22 A. He said he's a target.\n23 Q. Did you invest in the Miles Guo investments because he said\n24 he was being targeted by the CCP?\n25 A. No.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 Q. Why did you invest in the Miles Guo's investments?\n2 A. Because I want to make money. He promise huge return with\n3 no risk.\n4 Q. Of the money that you invested, how much have you gotten\n5 back?\n6 A. I got back the SEC fair fund distribution about 180,000 or\n7 something.\n8 Q. In total how much money did you invest?\n9 A. I invest almost 1.3 million.\n10 Q. So how much are you still owed?\n11 A. About 1.1 million.\n12 MS. SHROFF: Objection to the word \"owed.\"\n13 THE COURT: Overruled.\n14 Q. Ms. Chen, if it were true that Miles Guo was targeted by\n15 the CCP, would you still want your $1.1 million back?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. If it were true that Miles Guo was targeted by the CCP,\n18 does that change your view on whether you're still owed $1.1\n19 million?\n20 A. No, it would not change my view.\n21 Q. What does Miles Guo's being targeted -- withdrawn.\n22 Ms. Chen, does the fact that the CCP may have targeted\n23 Miles Guo, what impact, if any, does that have on your\n24 experience investing in the Miles Guo projects?\n25 A. It has no impact. Fraud is a fraud. It has no impact with\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 anything else.\n2 Q. If it's true that Miles Guo was targeted by the CCP, does\n3 it make what he did to you okay?\n4 MS. SHROFF: Objection, assumes facts not in evidence.\n5 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n6 THE WITNESS: Sorry, am I answer or --\n7 THE COURT: Yes, you answer.\n8 A. Can you repeat the question. And I couldn't hear that\n9 attorney very well. Do you mind putting the mic closer to you.\n10 MS. SHROFF: Most people don't have trouble not\n11 hearing me, but, sure. I objected and the judge overruled my\n12 objection.\n13 A. Okay, then, I got distracted. Do you mind repeating the\n14 question again.\n15 Q. No problem. Ms. Chen, if it is true that Miles Guo was\n16 targeted by the CCP, does that make what he did to you okay?\n17 A. No, he damaged my life.\n18 Q. How so?\n19 A. He lied to me by --\n20 THE COURT: All right. I have to interrupt now. I\n21 have told the members of the audience I do not want laughing.\n22 I do not want noise. You must be respectful in this courtroom\n23 or I will have you ejected. Go ahead, please. You were\n24 answering. I interrupted. You can read back what she has\n25 already stated.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Direct\n1 (Record was read)\n2 A. Miles Guo lied to me and gain my trust by emphasizing and\n3 repeating over and over again that he's very honest,\n4 trustworthy person. He never lied. He brainwash me into\n5 believing him by telling his story that made me believe that\n6 he's a very nice, kind, carrying person. He lied to me to make\n7 me believe that he cares about me as his sister. He lied to me\n8 to make me believe that he's willing to share his wealth with\n9 me as his sister.\n10 And he took advantage of my hope, of my hope for\n11 providing a better life for my older parents and young children\n12 by promising huge returns with zero risk. He depicted a\n13 beautiful future for my family that deceived me in giving all\n14 my money, all my hard earned money and all my hard saved money\n15 to him to pay for his families, his daughters, his sons, lavish\n16 and extravagant life. Miles Guo is a liar. He's a cheater.\n17 He's shameless and heartless cheater and fraudster.\n18 Q. Do you see Miles Guo in the courtroom here today?\n19 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, I stipulate Mr. Guo is seated\n20 to my left.\n21 THE COURT: All right.\n22 Q. Is that Miles Guo?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 MR. FINKEL: Nothing further.\n25 THE COURT: Cross-examination.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 CROSS-EXAMINATION\n2 BY MS. SHROFF:\n3 Q. Good afternoon, Ms. Chen.\n4 A. Good afternoon.\n5 Q. How are you?\n6 A. I'm good. How are you?\n7 Q. I'm a little tired, but let's see.\n8 Ms. Chen, could you tell the ladies and gentlemen of\n9 this jury who is IvyIvy6538?\n10 A. That's my nickname at MOS farm.\n11 Q. Let me show you --\n12 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, can we approach for a moment?\n13 THE COURT: Yes.\n14 (Continued on next page)\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 (At sidebar)\n2 MR. FINKEL: Maybe this isn't an issue, but especially\n3 in light of what's been happening in the gallery today. I\n4 certainly hope that Ms. Shroff is not just going to go through\n5 personal identifying information of the victim from the witness\n6 which would be inappropriate and just a way to harass her. So\n7 I raise this only at sidebar to make sure there will be nothing\n8 else in terms of her personal identifying information.\n9 THE COURT: I feel confident that she would not do\n10 that. Isn't that correct, Ms. Shroff?\n11 MS. SHROFF: I should hope so, your Honor. I have\n12 deep respect for the Court's ruling, and I'm happy to lay out\n13 what I was trying to do. What I was going to do is show the\n14 handles that she used during the time that she was active in\n15 the community. And before I forget, I just want to say that\n16 what the audience does, we don't have control over. There are\n17 certain people in this audience that we have specifically\n18 asked, do not be here, for example. We've even tried to\n19 communicate with those people's lawyers that they should not be\n20 here. So to attribute anything to us is really, I don't know\n21 where that's going, but I'm just putting it out there. We're\n22 not friends. We have no control over who's in the audience.\n23 Let me get back to Ivy. Ivy is a handle that she\n24 used. I'm going to show her a photo of the handle. I'm also\n25 going to show her the photo of the handle of her husband. The\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 government knows this because the government has emails from\n2 somebody name All Well. I plan to show a handle photo of\n3 somebody named Octopus. I plan to show a photo of somebody\n4 name Faithfully. They're open handles. I'm never going to ask\n5 her if she's XXXXX. I don't intend to ask her that. I have no\n6 intention of helping the jury feel sympathetic for her. That's\n7 not my role. I think all of this is proper cross-examination.\n8 And if the government doesn't know of these handles, I\n9 apologize, but that's not my responsibility.\n10 MR. FINKEL: First, before I forget, we ask that we\n11 seal the answer of her name XXXXX and just put the witness.\n12 MS. SHROFF: That's fine. You can just take out the\n13 name from the sidebar. I do note this, your Honor, her last\n14 name is Chen. When the jury was picked, XXXXX was one of the\n15 names we cited. If somebody really wanted to put two and two\n16 together, it's not going to take a rocket scientist to do that.\n17 MR. FINKEL: We don't have to help people do it. We\n18 should protect the victims. They have a statutory right to\n19 such protection.\n20 THE COURT: It's also an extremely common name.\n21 MR. FINKEL: If I could respond to what Ms. Shroff\n22 said?\n23 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n24 MR. FINKEL: I don't think there's any relevance of\n25 going through the various handles that she used with the farms\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 about which she is now testifying and telling things about what\n2 happened in the farms. It should be excluded because it's just\n3 designed to harass the witness. It's entirely fine for\n4 Ms. Shroff to say, Did you use handles? Did you use different\n5 log-in names, and I suspect the answer to those questions would\n6 be yes. If she wants to put Fay Fay's user name in front of\n7 her, fine. If she wants to put Octopus's name in front of her,\n8 fine. And make the point, I'm sure it's a very important one,\n9 that she used handles just like Octopus and Fay Fay. But to\n10 use the specific names that this witness used, which I think is\n11 in our 3500. It says that she's nervous about being found out\n12 of her handles. And in fact --\n13 MS. SHROFF: There's no such thing.\n14 MR. FINKEL: Please don't interrupt me. Your Honor\n15 may recall that in one of the bank records it said MOS, and\n16 there is a line redacted. The line redacted was her MOS, her\n17 Mountain of Spices ID number because she doesn't want the\n18 Mountain of Spices people to go after her, like they went after\n19 Luc Despins and his daughter and his son-in-law. And so I\n20 object to the use of these user names and questioning as to\n21 specificity because it was just designed to harass this victim.\n22 MS. SHROFF: It is not.\n23 THE COURT: Let me understand something, are you\n24 saying that all of these user names are associated with her?\n25 MR. FINKEL: I don't know, but apparently Ms. Shroff\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 believes that these two user names are associated with her.\n2 It's not the association that Ms. Shroff is trying to draw out\n3 based on what she just represented to your Honor, it's the\n4 point that she used user names as opposed to her true name. So\n5 that point is fine to make and it could be made in a generic\n6 fashion and have the same dramatic impact on the jury as using\n7 the specific ones.\n8 THE COURT: How is it that you know that these fake\n9 names will enable members of the public to identify her?\n10 MR. FINKEL: Because that's how the community knows\n11 her, in the same way that the community knew Ya Li as Mulan.\n12 The community knows her by this identity. And I know it is her\n13 identity because Ms. Shroff asked the question and she said\n14 yes. And I suspect that there's going to be a slew of this.\n15 This is the government's objection. If we're overruled, we're\n16 overruled. That's fine. But this is a point that we felt is\n17 important to make.\n18 MS. SHROFF: May I just clarify?\n19 THE COURT: Yes.\n20 MS. SHROFF: So the handler is linked to the name\n21 under which she is testifying. She's testifying under her own\n22 name, right?\n23 MR. FINKEL: Yes.\n24 MS. SHROFF: That's what it's linked to. She engages\n25 with people under that handle. She sends out text under that\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 handle. She sends out emails with that handle. She filled out\n2 her volunteer hours with that handle. She talks to H Coin\n3 people with that handle, and I intend to very properly march\n4 through that evidence with this witness. I will never say that\n5 this person is associated with XXXXX, which is what the Court\n6 prescribe me from doing.\n7 THE COURT: Is there anything that links any of those\n8 names to XXXXX?\n9 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, I'm not sure. That's the\n10 candid answer. What I do know is that the community uses these\n11 handles to identify people, and that's how they find people.\n12 That's how all this works. That's how the enterprise is\n13 structured. Everyone is known by Fay Fay or Feather or Octopus\n14 or Saturn or what have you. If Ms. Shroff wants to put\n15 specific statements to her, okay. But to go through each and\n16 every ID we object because we think that's harassment.\n17 THE COURT: How many IDs do you think that she has?\n18 MS. SHROFF: I don't think she has more than Ivy Ivy\n19 and the number. That's her ID. That's how she communicated\n20 with her everyone, and it's not linked through the name XXXXX.\n21 I have exhibits to show her with that ID, and I have exhibits\n22 to show her with that handle. That is her handle. She also\n23 uses multiple Gmail accounts, right. So the government has\n24 literally redacted the entire account. We ask that at least it\n25 make clear, the document make clear, that she's copied on the\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 email. They refused, so I don't care that her actual email\n2 shows. Some of the evidence, the truthfulness of the evidence\n3 is, she got a copy of that document.\n4 THE COURT: So what I understand you to be saying is\n5 that you want to ask whether she goes by a particular handle,\n6 one handle?\n7 MS. SHROFF: That's it, one handle.\n8 THE COURT: You also want to ask whether she is really\n9 affiliated with other handles?\n10 MS. SHROFF: No, her interactions with the other\n11 handles.\n12 THE COURT: I find that to be acceptable.\n13 (Continued on next page)\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 (In open court)\n2 THE COURT: Go ahead.\n3 BY MS. SHROFF:\n4 Q. I was asking you about IvyIvy 6538, correct?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. Is that a handle you use, ma'am?\n7 A. That's just a nickname that I had for the MOS farm\n8 registration.\n9 Q. And did you tell the government about that MOS farm\n10 registration that you used?\n11 A. I did not.\n12 Q. Let's pull it up just for the government and the witness,\n13 please. Do you recognize Defense Exhibit 7010?\n14 A. That's my discord registration.\n15 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, the offense moves DX-7010\n16 into evidence.\n17 MR. FINKEL: I object for the reasons described at\n18 sidebar.\n19 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n20 (Defendant's Exhibit 7010 received in evidence)\n21 MS. SHROFF: If I could publish to the jury.\n22 Q. Who is All Well 5921?\n23 A. That's my husband discord registration number.\n24 Q. And let me show you DX7011. Do you recognize that\n25 document?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. Yeah.\n2 Q. Is that DX7008?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And what do you recognize it to be?\n5 A. That's my husband's discord registration number as being\n6 are registering on any social media platform they use a\n7 nickname.\n8 MS. SHROFF: And we move DX-7008 into evidence.\n9 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, can we approach?\n10 THE COURT: All righty.\n11 (Continued on next page)\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 (At the sidebar)\n2 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, I'm sorry to belabor this,\n3 but this is different from what Ms. Shroff had told your Honor.\n4 MS. SHROFF: Those are the two handles.\n5 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Shroff is doxing this witness. What\n6 this community does in this enterprise is they attack people\n7 online, on Twitter, on Discord and other social media channels.\n8 She's putting into evidence just the handle to make it a point\n9 so all the people in the courtroom and everyone else know how\n10 to go after her and her husband. This is entirely\n11 inappropriate. This has nothing to do with the reasons that\n12 Ms. Shroff articulated here at the sidebar just a moment ago.\n13 This is pure harassment and doxing.\n14 THE COURT: Mr. Finkel, if I don't let her confront\n15 this witness and you get a conviction, it's going to get\n16 overturn. She needs to be able to confront the witness. She\n17 has come here freely. She's stated her name. You may go\n18 forward.\n19 (Continued on next page)\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 (In open court)\n2 MS. SHROFF: And we move 7008 into evidence.\n3 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n4 (Defendant's Exhibit 7008 received in evidence)\n5 BY MS. SHROFF:\n6 Q. And may we publish to the jury.\n7 Ms. Chen, do you know somebody named Octopus?\n8 A. Yes.\n9 Q. And who is she?\n10 A. She's the current farm owner of MOS farm.\n11 Q. And let me show you what is marked as Defense Exhibit 7011.\n12 Do you recognize that document?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. And what is it?\n15 A. That's Octopus's discord information.\n16 MS. SHROFF: And we like to move 7011 into evidence.\n17 MR. FINKEL: No objection.\n18 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n19 (Defendant's Exhibit 7011 received in evidence)\n20 BY MS. SHROFF:\n21 Q. Could you tell the members of the jury who is Faith Night?\n22 A. Faith Night is working at MOS farm.\n23 Q. And let me show what you is marked as DX7009. Do you\n24 recognize that?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Is that the handle for Ms. Faith Night?\n2 A. Yes, discord registration information.\n3 MS. SHROFF: And we like to move DX7009 into evidence\n4 and publish it to the jury.\n5 MR. FINKEL: No objection.\n6 THE COURT: It is admitted.\n7 (Defendant's Exhibit 7009 received in evidence)\n8 BY MS. SHROFF:\n9 Q. Can you tell me who Fay Fay is?\n10 A. Fay Fay is someone who is also part of the movement.\n11 Q. And how about Little Sarah?\n12 A. Same here, also part of the movement.\n13 Q. And, Ms. Chen, did you interact with Octopus?\n14 A. When you say interact, do you mean I communicated with her?\n15 Q. Did you talk to her over Discord?\n16 A. Yes, I talk to her over Discord.\n17 Q. How about Faith Night?\n18 A. Yes, I talk to her over Discord.\n19 Q. And we're going to come back to that, but you were in a\n20 group with them, correct?\n21 A. I explain earlier I was doing volunteer work.\n22 Q. We will come back to that too, but those are the three\n23 people who were in the group with you, right?\n24 A. In volunteer work, there are certain aspects that I\n25 communicate to them about my volunteer work.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. We'll come back to that. Let's just talk for a moment\n2 about your background.\n3 You testified on direct that you came to the United\n4 States, was it in 2007?\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. And you were a student in China before you came, correct?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. You studied at the Shanghai Institute of Foreign Trade,\n9 correct?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. And you studied international business, correct?\n12 A. That's not correct.\n13 Q. Well, tell me what did you study?\n14 A. I studied English.\n15 Q. And did you then study and have a business education?\n16 A. So when you say I studied and have a business education, do\n17 you mean I came to the U.S. for the business education or can\n18 you clarify?\n19 Q. Sure. Did you have any studies in business while you were\n20 a student in China?\n21 A. I studied English and it's considered business English.\n22 Q. And did you also study accounting while you were in China?\n23 A. No, I did not.\n24 Q. And then you graduated from Shanghai Institute of Foreign\n25 Trade in 2006, correct?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. You graduated with honors, correct?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And you worked in China for a year following graduation,\n5 right?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. You worked as an internal audit analyst; is that right?\n8 A. No, that's not correct.\n9 Q. You tell me in what capacity you worked?\n10 A. I worked as assistant.\n11 Q. Assisted to what?\n12 A. To a department manager back then.\n13 Q. And was that at Huntsman Polyurethanes in Shanghai?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And you stayed there until July of 2007, correct?\n16 A. Yes.\n17 Q. What did you do for Huntsman?\n18 A. I was doing some assistant type of job.\n19 Q. Did it include accounting?\n20 A. No.\n21 Q. You came to the United States in 2007, right?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And you attended Louisiana State University; is that right?\n24 A. Yes.\n25 Q. You came here for graduate school, correct?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. Were you a full scholarship student, Ms. Chen?\n3 MR. FINKEL: Object to relevance.\n4 THE COURT: You may answer.\n5 A. Yes.\n6 Q. You were part of the MBA program at LSU, correct?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. You graduated with a masters in business administration,\n9 correct?\n10 A. Yes.\n11 Q. Your specialization while you attended school and got an\n12 MBA was internal auditing, correct?\n13 A. That's correct.\n14 Q. Your husband has a Ph.D. in computer science, correct?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. And he has a Ph.D. from a university in the United States,\n17 correct?\n18 A. That's correct.\n19 Q. And you are presently employed, correct?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. You work at a bank, correct?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And after LSU and before you started working at this bank,\n24 you worked at Deloitte, correct?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. What is Deloitte?\n2 A. It's one of the Big Four accounting firms.\n3 Q. And what did you do for them?\n4 A. I do consulting work.\n5 Q. Did you do risk assessment as a consultant?\n6 A. I do advisory on the processing improvement and risk\n7 management related work.\n8 Q. Let's break that down. Did you have experience in insuring\n9 compliance at Deloitte?\n10 A. No.\n11 Q. Did you have expertise in assessing risk when you worked at\n12 Deloitte?\n13 MR. FINKEL: Scope, relevance, cumulative.\n14 THE COURT: Overruled. You can answer.\n15 A. Can you repeat that question.\n16 Q. While you worked at Deloitte and you were there until 2011,\n17 correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. Was part of your job duties assessing risk?\n20 A. It's helping the clients managing the risk.\n21 Q. And what is it that you mean when you say helping clients\n22 manage risk?\n23 Describe your job for the jury?\n24 A. So the clients that I work for, they may have different\n25 risk out there, so my job is to helping them to identify what\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 those risk are and be able to prioritize in managing them.\n2 Q. And these are the risk of investment, correct?\n3 A. Of course not.\n4 Q. Well, you tell me what risk you're helping them evaluate?\n5 A. So the client that have was in oil and gas company.\n6 Q. I'm sorry.\n7 A. The client I have is in oil and gas industry, so there are\n8 potential operational risk, and this is where I'm helping them\n9 to evaluate.\n10 Q. You help them evaluate financial risk and --\n11 A. Operational risk.\n12 Q. Operational risk. And after that you worked as a senior\n13 auditor, correct?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And you worked as a senior auditor -- and can you just tell\n16 the jury generally what a senior auditor does?\n17 A. The auditor will go to the business, asking for the\n18 processes, how it works to pinpoint the potential risk; and\n19 then from there identify the controls and then develop an audit\n20 plan to audit the business processes.\n21 Q. And part of your job duties was to right out that process,\n22 correct?\n23 A. Yes.\n24 Q. And then you testified you now work at a bank, right?\n25 A. Yes.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. And what is your job title at the bank?\n2 A. I'm manager.\n3 Q. Manager of what?\n4 A. Of risk.\n5 Q. Of compliance risk, correct?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. So your exact title is you're the manager of compliant\n8 risk, right?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. How many people do you manage?\n11 A. I manage five people.\n12 Q. And part of your job includes conducting annual compliance\n13 risk assessments, correct?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And there is a process to conducting annual compliance risk\n16 assessment, isn't there?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. And to do the work that you do, you have to pay attention\n19 to detail, correct?\n20 MR. FINKEL: Objection, the Court has made a ruling on\n21 this issue.\n22 THE COURT: Ms. Shroff, I want you to be mindful of my\n23 ruling, please.\n24 MS. SHROFF: I'm simply asking what her processes is.\n25 Q. To do your assessment, regardless of where you do it, and\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 please don't tell me where, you have to assess operational\n2 risk, correct?\n3 MR. FINKEL: It's an objection, and asked and\n4 answered.\n5 THE COURT: Asked and answered.\n6 Q. And you have to idea responsible parties, correct?\n7 MR. FINKEL: Objection, Court's ruling.\n8 THE COURT: I'm going to allow this. Go ahead.\n9 A. When you say identify responsible party, can you clarify\n10 what are you asking me?\n11 Q. Which parties are undertaking the risk?\n12 A. That's not necessarily my job. That's not my job.\n13 Q. Okay. Is it your job to review related policies?\n14 A. No, that's not my job.\n15 Q. How about to set procedures in place?\n16 A. That's not my job.\n17 Q. How about to consider audits?\n18 A. That's not my job.\n19 Q. How about to evaluate reports?\n20 A. That's not my job.\n21 Q. How is it, would you tell the jury, that you ensure that\n22 compliance controls are in place?\n23 MR. FINKEL: Objection, relevance, Court's ruling.\n24 THE COURT: I'll allow the answer. Go ahead.\n25 A. The assessment we do is more top down risk assessment\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 coming from the enterprise level to identify what are the top\n2 risk out there, so it does not involve the processes you just\n3 spoke about.\n4 Q. Well, you tell me what processes are involved?\n5 A. I have explained. It's a top down risk assessment.\n6 Q. And what is the risk that you're evaluating?\n7 MR. FINKEL: Objection, relevance.\n8 THE COURT: You may answer.\n9 A. Evaluating the risk of consumer compliance from the\n10 consumer protection bureaus to protect the customers from\n11 potentially being deceived into the bank practice.\n12 Q. Thank you. Is it also part of your job to create a plan of\n13 action?\n14 A. No.\n15 Q. And how about to make recommendations as to how compliance\n16 can improve?\n17 A. No.\n18 Q. And for how long have you been doing this work, Ms. Chen?\n19 A. For about 14 or 15 years.\n20 Q. You testified on direct, correct, that you first heard of\n21 Miles Guo in 2017, right?\n22 A. Yes.\n23 Q. And before you heard of Miles Guo, your husband, you\n24 testified, was listening to the videos of Miles Guo; is that\n25 right?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. Yes.\n2 Q. And when Miles Guo's videos were being watched by your\n3 husband, did he tell you what about his videos interested your\n4 husband?\n5 MR. FINKEL: Objection, hearsay.\n6 MS. SHROFF: I'm not offering it for the truth.\n7 THE COURT: You may answer.\n8 A. Talk about bringing American value of China.\n9 Q. I'm sorry.\n10 A. Talk about bringing American value to China.\n11 Q. In 2017, was Mr. Miles Guo talking about bringing American\n12 values to China?\n13 A. That's what my husband told me.\n14 Q. Do you know if in 2017 Mr. Guo was talking about\n15 disinformation coming from the CCP?\n16 MR. FINKEL: Objection.\n17 THE COURT: You may answer.\n18 A. I did not watch back then. I don't know.\n19 Q. When you first started listening to Mr. Guo, do you recall\n20 him talking about corruption in China?\n21 A. I did.\n22 Q. And did you hear about him talking about the lack of\n23 freedom in China?\n24 A. I don't remember.\n25 Q. Do you remember if he talked about the lack of property\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 rights in China?\n2 A. I don't remember.\n3 Q. Do you remember if he talked about the lack of choice in\n4 China?\n5 A. I don't remember.\n6 Q. Do you recall if his videos talked about how one could not\n7 choose their own jobs in China?\n8 MR. FINKEL: Same objection.\n9 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n10 A. I don't remember.\n11 Q. In what year, Ms. Chen, did you start listening to Miles\n12 Guo's videos?\n13 A. End of 2018.\n14 Q. And I'm not going to go through the whole list with you,\n15 but were any of those topics that I mentioned before topics\n16 that you recall in 2018?\n17 A. It's been so long, I don't remember.\n18 Q. Do you ever recall Mr. Guo talking about the state of\n19 affairs in Hong Kong?\n20 A. I think so.\n21 Q. And what do you recall him saying about Hong Kong?\n22 A. I don't remember.\n23 Q. Sitting here today, Ms. Chen, would you agree that speaking\n24 against the CCP whether in 2017 or in 2024 is risky?\n25 A. You're asking my opinion?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Yes, ma'am.\n2 A. If it's risky?\n3 Q. Yes, ma'am.\n4 A. I don't know.\n5 Q. And when you were interacting on Discord -- you know what.\n6 I'll withdraw that.\n7 You decided at some point to join what is called the\n8 whistleblower movement, correct?\n9 A. I join the farm in 2022.\n10 Q. And before you joined the farm in 2022, is it your\n11 understanding that you did not join any movement at all?\n12 A. So I ask -- can you clarify that question in a simple way?\n13 Q. I'll try it this way. What was your first step towards the\n14 whistleblower movement?\n15 A. My first step towards the whistle -- I have nothing to do\n16 with the whistleblower movement.\n17 Q. Did you have anything to do with the goals of the Rules Of\n18 Law Foundation?\n19 A. I donated money.\n20 Q. I was asking you about the goals of the Rule of Law\n21 Foundation, were you familiar with that?\n22 A. My understanding is helping the people that needs help.\n23 Q. And with that understanding, did you know if Rules of Law\n24 Foundation helped bring people to the United States from China?\n25 A. That I don't know.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Do you know if they helped people in the Ukraine war?\n2 A. That is my understanding, so I donated money for that help.\n3 Q. And how about providing Covid mask and other mask to\n4 people?\n5 A. That part I'm not sure.\n6 Q. Now, you donated money to Rule of Law Foundation, correct?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. How much did you donate?\n9 A. About $30,000.\n10 Q. And do you recall what year you donated in?\n11 A. So it's between 2020 and 2022.\n12 Q. Well, let's talk about that. In 2020, how much did you\n13 donate according to you?\n14 A. My husband donated a couple of hundred dollars.\n15 Q. 400 to be precise, right?\n16 A. I said a couple of hundred. I don't remember exactly how\n17 much he donated.\n18 Q. How much did you donate in 2020?\n19 A. Back then it's a joint donation.\n20 Q. How about in 2021?\n21 A. I don't remember, maybe also a couple of hundred dollars.\n22 Q. And how about in 2022?\n23 A. About $30,000.\n24 Q. And you donated that in September of 2022, correct?\n25 A. That's correct.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. And before you made that donation, you familiarized\n2 yourself with who was on the board of the Rule of Law\n3 Foundation, correct?\n4 A. No, I don't know who's on the board of the Rule of Law\n5 Foundation.\n6 Q. So you did not check the Rule of Law Foundation website?\n7 A. I just open the website, and I don't know where to find the\n8 board of directors and I don't think that matters to me at that\n9 point.\n10 Q. It did not matter to you who was part of the foundation?\n11 A. You said the board of directors specifically, right?\n12 Q. Yes.\n13 A. At that time?\n14 Q. The board did not matter?\n15 A. When you say at that time, what time are you referring to?\n16 Can you clarify?\n17 Q. When you made the $30,000 donation in September of 2022.\n18 A. I did not check who is the board of directors when I made\n19 that investment back in September 2022.\n20 Q. Well, let's shift courses if we may, and let's talk about\n21 the GTV investment that you testified here on direct testimony.\n22 Okay.\n23 A. Okay.\n24 Q. Now, was it your husband who first decided to invest in GTV\n25 or was it you?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. It's a joint decision.\n2 Q. And was it a joint decision from the very first moment?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And would it be fair to say that you heard of the private\n5 placement for GTV in April of 2020?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. And would it also be fair to say that you and your husband\n8 were involved in the full process of the investment?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. And you understood at the time that you were evaluating\n11 investing in GTV that the private placement was scheduled to\n12 close on June 2 of 2020, correct?\n13 A. So you say evaluate to investing, so meaning I was\n14 assessing? Can you clarify that question?\n15 Q. You tell me if you assessed.\n16 A. We trusted Miles Guo so we invested.\n17 Q. So you did not assess anything other than the trust you had\n18 in Miles Guo, that's your testimony?\n19 A. We trusted Miles Guo said about what the GTV would look\n20 like, and we read the documents and confirmed what Miles Guo\n21 said would be its competitors and what they're going to use the\n22 money for.\n23 Q. Finish your answer, please. Sorry.\n24 A. I was not sure what you were asking, that's why I was\n25 trying to make sure I understand what you're asking there.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Let me try again. You first heard about GTV more than a\n2 month before you invested, correct?\n3 A. Yes.\n4 Q. And you told Mr. Finkel that, right, that you had a whole\n5 month to talk about it with your husband between the time you\n6 heard about GTV and the time that you actually invested in GTV,\n7 correct?\n8 A. I did not say that. I think what happened is, there's a\n9 process it takes to be approved for a GTV investor, so there is\n10 certain criteria you have to meet to be able to get the payment\n11 information because it was considered privileged. Miles said\n12 you have to meet certain requirement to be allowed for this\n13 investment, and that requirement validation took about that\n14 much time to be validated to be approved.\n15 Q. So it took a whole month from the start of the application\n16 for you to be approved, correct?\n17 A. For us to obtain the bank account information.\n18 Q. So it took a month, right?\n19 A. That's long time ago. If you say it's a month, about a\n20 month.\n21 Q. Let's see if we can help you out. Let me show you what is\n22 3602-30 at page two, and just for Ms. Chen over there. Please\n23 just only for the witness. Okay.\n24 MR. FINKEL: Is there a failure of recollection?\n25 MS. SHROFF: That's what she said.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Does that document refresh your recollection about a month\n2 passing between -- you know what, I'll leave you to read the\n3 document and then ask my question.\n4 A. Is this --\n5 Q. The only question, ma'am, is if this document refreshes\n6 your recollection?\n7 THE COURT: As to the time period?\n8 MS. SHROFF: As to the timing, your Honor.\n9 THE COURT: Don't read from it, just say whether this\n10 helps you remember.\n11 A. You mean about the month, is that what you ask me, about\n12 the month?\n13 As I explain, you have a process between you heard\n14 about the ATO. You are able to obtain a bank account, send the\n15 money, so that's about a month.\n16 Q. And for that month you were waiting for information to come\n17 to you, correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. Nobody from GTV was blasting you and saying we've sent you\n20 documents, get back to us, right?\n21 A. There is a deadline about the investment.\n22 Q. My question wasn't whether there was a deadline. My\n23 question was whether anybody from GTV contacted you and said\n24 where is your application?\n25 A. You're asking me --\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. If you could please listen to my question.\n2 Did anyone from GTV investments ask you where is your\n3 application? For the month that you were waiting, did GTV\n4 reach out to you?\n5 MR. FINKEL: I object to the form. What people from\n6 GTV investments. What does that mean?\n7 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\n8 A. I'm sorry. I still don't quite understand. You're asking\n9 are there any people from GTV investment contact me about my\n10 application or --\n11 Q. Yes.\n12 A. Yeah, there are people contact me about an application.\n13 Q. And which people were those?\n14 A. So the broadcasting said about reaching out --\n15 Q. No. No. Which people at GTV investment?\n16 MR. FINKEL: Ms. Shroff should not interrupt the\n17 witness.\n18 THE COURT: Let her answer.\n19 Q. Did you understand my question, Ms. Chen?\n20 A. Sorry, I think for this question, are there any people from\n21 GTV investment contacting me?\n22 Q. The company.\n23 A. Company contacting me?\n24 Q. Yes.\n25 A. So Miles Guo contacted us.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Miles Guo never contacted you, correct?\n2 A. Miles Guo contacted my husband.\n3 Q. You do not know if Miles Guo contacted your husband,\n4 correct? You were not part of that contact, right?\n5 A. My husband --\n6 Q. You only know --\n7 THE COURT: You have to allow her to answer. You\n8 cannot talk over her. Allow her to answer. Go ahead.\n9 A. My husband was chatting directly with Miles Guo on\n10 Whatsapp, and I am next to him hearing Miles Guo voice mail\n11 from the Whatsapp messaging.\n12 Q. Okay. So then it's you were physically present when you\n13 hear a voice mail from Mr. Guo, correct?\n14 A. Yes.\n15 Q. And regardless of his voice mail, you were still waiting\n16 for 30 full days to get an account number where you could get\n17 your money, correct?\n18 A. That's not correct.\n19 Q. Okay. How long did you wait between the first time you\n20 heard his voice and to the time that somebody actually sent you\n21 a bank account number? How long was the wait?\n22 A. So it's been a while I wanted to say that we did not first\n23 get contacted with Miles Guo. So when I say the full month, it\n24 started sending application to Sara Wei first telling her that\n25 we have an interest in investment and it's above 100,000. And\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 we waited a while to hear back, and then Sara told us we pass\n2 the qualification test, and then we were given Miles Guo\n3 contact information, so that has been some time pass to your\n4 question earlier on that one month.\n5 So by the time we receive Miles Guo contact and he\n6 send us the information to make the GTV investment, we made the\n7 GTV investment in sending the money very quickly. I think only\n8 a couple of days as soon as we receive the wire instruction\n9 information.\n10 Q. So let's break that down. You contacted Sara Wei, correct?\n11 A. Because Miles Guo said in the video to contact Sara Wei to\n12 get the information for completing GTV investment.\n13 Q. Miles Guo told you, we've heard that before. I understand.\n14 My question is, you contacted Sara Wei. Did you\n15 contact her or did your husband contact her?\n16 A. My husband contacted her.\n17 Q. And how long did your husband wait to hear back from Sara\n18 Wei?\n19 A. It's been sometime. I want to say it's been a couple of\n20 weeks, maybe two or three weeks if I remember correctly, but\n21 it's been sometime, maybe between his first contact and got\n22 approval.\n23 Q. And for the couple of weeks that you were waiting, do you\n24 recall your husband telling you that he had tried to reach\n25 Mr. Guo himself?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. He doesn't have information to contact Miles Guo.\n2 Q. So your husband did not tell you that; is that right?\n3 A. He told me -- what do you mean he did not tell me that?\n4 What's your question again? Are you asking me -- can you\n5 repeat your question again?\n6 Q. Sure. By the time that you're waiting to hear back from\n7 Sara Wei, right, does your husband tell you that he is\n8 impatient and trying to reach Mr. Guo?\n9 A. He did not say that to me.\n10 Q. Now, when you were evaluating what GTV was, did you do any\n11 research at all?\n12 MR. FINKEL: Object on the basis of the Court's\n13 ruling.\n14 THE COURT: You may inquire as to whether she did any\n15 research. You can answer.\n16 A. When you say research, oh, I listen to his broadcasting\n17 video, and then I heard his like blueprint about the GTV and\n18 then that's it.\n19 Q. Was it important to you that Kyle Bass was on the board of\n20 GTV?\n21 A. It had some influence.\n22 Q. And you knew who Kyle Bass was, right?\n23 A. I don't know that well in details, but I know he's a\n24 investor.\n25 Q. You know him to be an investor?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. I know him being a successful institution investor private\n2 equity. He's successful in investments.\n3 Q. And you testified on direct that you started the GTV\n4 investment process on May 11 of 2020, right?\n5 A. When you say I started a process, can you clarify what you\n6 mean when you say --\n7 Q. Contacting Sara Wei, that was on May 11?\n8 A. I don't remember that date.\n9 Q. You don't remember that date?\n10 MR. FINKEL: Asked and answered.\n11 THE COURT: She has asked the question.\n12 MS. SHROFF: Sometimes I just can't understand so I\n13 repeat the response.\n14 THE COURT: So speak into the microphone, please.\n15 Q. On May 12, 2020 is when you received the private placement\n16 memorandum, right?\n17 A. I don't remember the date.\n18 Q. Did you receive the GTV first private placement memorandum\n19 or was it your husband?\n20 A. Miles sent the link to that document and we open a link and\n21 look at them together.\n22 Q. And along with the PPM, you were also sent a\n23 confidentiality agreement, correct?\n24 A. We follow the instruction provided and send in whichever\n25 document that's required for.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. I'm asking you whether you recall receiving the\n2 confidentiality agreement?\n3 A. I think so.\n4 Q. Do you recall receiving the subscription agreement?\n5 A. I think so.\n6 Q. And do you recall receiving the shareholders agreement?\n7 A. Maybe. I don't remember exactly what it is.\n8 Q. Do you remember receiving the note along with those\n9 documents that said old friends and perspective investors who\n10 receive this agreement, please read it carefully?\n11 A. I don't remember that.\n12 Q. Do you recall being told that the private placement would\n13 end at 11 a.m. New York time on May 26 of 2020?\n14 A. I don't remember the detail date.\n15 Q. Let me ask you something, when your husband was responding\n16 or corresponding with Mr. Guo, you said you were right there,\n17 correct?\n18 A. Yes.\n19 Q. So you recall your husband telling Mr. Guo that he would go\n20 and carefully review the agreement and meticulously follow all\n21 the requirements stated in it, do you recall your husband\n22 saying that?\n23 MR. FINKEL: Objection, hearsay and the Court's\n24 ruling.\n25 THE COURT: Overruled. You may answer.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. I don't remember that.\n2 Q. Do you recall after that your husband confirming that he\n3 had read the conditions for GTV private placement?\n4 A. I don't remember that.\n5 Q. You testified on direct about what it is to be an\n6 accredited investor, correct?\n7 A. Yes.\n8 Q. And to be an accredited investor, you tell me what was your\n9 understanding of that?\n10 A. A joint income of above $300,000 and in equity of more than\n11 a million excepting the primary home.\n12 Q. And you had that, right?\n13 A. Yes.\n14 Q. Do you recall when you first transferred the money after\n15 noting that you were an accredit investor?\n16 A. Yes, I'm accredited investor.\n17 Q. Do you recall sitting here today whether the investment was\n18 made in your name, your husband's name or both your names?\n19 A. We sent a couple wires. Some of them are in my name. Some\n20 of them are in his name, and some of them are in our joint\n21 name.\n22 Q. And, Ms. Chen, just for a moment if I could ask you, you\n23 testified on direct, right, that you -- well, let me ask you\n24 this. Before you invested in GTV, you had bought stock,\n25 correct?\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 A. No, I have not.\n2 Q. Your testimony is that -- not shares, stock?\n3 MR. FINKEL: Asked and answered.\n4 THE COURT: Sustained.\n5 Q. Did you ever have an investment where you had lost money,\n6 do you recall that?\n7 A. I don't remember that.\n8 Q. Well, let me show you 3530 at page three. See if reading\n9 that document refreshes your recollection.\n10 A. I don't remember, so.\n11 Q. So you do not remember investing in stock or losing money?\n12 MR. FINKEL: Asked and answered. She doesn't\n13 remember.\n14 THE COURT: Sustained.\n15 Q. You can take that down. Was it your understanding that GTV\n16 was an investment in a startup?\n17 A. My understanding of the GTV that Miles promoted is private\n18 placement.\n19 Q. Private placement of what?\n20 A. You can buy a share before it goes to the public market.\n21 Q. But for what?\n22 A. For it to go --\n23 Q. For a startup, right?\n24 MR. FINKEL: Objection. She didn't finish the answer.\n25 THE COURT: Sustained.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Go ahead, finish.\n2 A. For it to go up 10 times or 100 times, that's what Miles\n3 Guo promoted and I believed back then.\n4 Q. He promoted a private placement and you believed; is that\n5 what you said?\n6 A. He promoted a private placement that could go up to 10\n7 times a hundred times that I believe in what he said.\n8 Q. You said that before. My question is whether you knew what\n9 he was talking about was it a startup?\n10 MR. FINKEL: Asked and answered.\n11 THE COURT: You already asked the question about the\n12 startup.\n13 Q. Let me show you what Mr. Finkel there showed you on your\n14 direct, the private placement itself. Do you recognize GXVK-5?\n15 A. Yes.\n16 Q. And this is the private placement memorandum, correct?\n17 A. Yes.\n18 Q. And I just want to be sure. I'm asking you did you read\n19 it?\n20 A. Yes.\n21 Q. You read it page to page, correct?\n22 A. I read this document.\n23 Q. Entirely?\n24 MR. FINKEL: Asked and answered.\n25 THE COURT: Sustained.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 Q. Let's take a look at it. Let's go to page nine. And if we\n2 could just have the full page shown to her first. You see that\n3 page?\n4 A. Yes.\n5 Q. And you see the bottom paragraph there?\n6 A. Yes.\n7 Q. It tells you, right, what the next page is going to be\n8 about, right?\n9 A. Yes.\n10 Q. And what is your understanding of what they're talking\n11 about in terms of the 200 million new shares?\n12 A. My understanding is it was holding by Saraca Media 100\n13 percent. Now Miles Guo want us to be rich, so he's taking 10\n14 percent and then giving his share to us to acquire at a dollar\n15 per share.\n16 Q. Where do you read Miles Guo wants us to be rich in the\n17 paragraph I've shown you?\n18 MR. FINKEL: Misstates the testimony. The question\n19 was, what was her understanding, not what it said.\n20 THE COURT: Sustained.\n21 Q. My question to you what does that paragraph state -- and I\n22 would move to strike and I will start the question all over\n23 again.\n24 THE COURT: Let's move on.\n25 Q. The offering that is on that piece of paper is for 200\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 million shares in exchange for $200 million, correct?\n2 A. So you're talking about the one you highlighted there you\n3 ask me?\n4 Q. I'm happy to take the highlight off.\n5 A. You're asking me if I'm reading it as 200 million for 200\n6 million shares?\n7 Q. That's my question.\n8 A. So my understanding is that talk about it issue the share\n9 at a dollar for a total of 20 million new share and maximum can\n10 be 200 million new share.\n11 Q. And it tells you, that document told you, right, that it\n12 was Saraca that was looking to sell 200 million shares,\n13 correct?\n14 A. My understanding back then was not Saraca selling it. My\n15 understanding back then is Miles told us he is finding this\n16 opportunity for us for a dollar a share, not saying Saraca is\n17 selling it to us.\n18 Q. I understand you've told us many times about your\n19 understanding. My question really relates to the document,\n20 right, Ms. Chen?\n21 A. I understand you're asking me about this document, but what\n22 I'm telling you is, I agree with you said. I read this\n23 document. And when I read this document, I have an\n24 understanding of what Miles said about it. So when I read it,\n25 I interpret it the way as Miles Guo said and broadcast it in a\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 video, that's why I'm explaining to you my understanding about\n2 it based on the time when I read it, based on the time I got\n3 influence from Miles Guo, from his broadcasting video.\n4 THE COURT: All right. This is the end of the day, so\n5 we're going to have to stop. Members of the jury, don't\n6 discuss the case amongst yourselves or with anyone else. Don't\n7 permit anyone else to discuss the case in your presence. Don't\n8 read, watch, listen to any source that touches upon the subject\n9 matter on this case. Have a good evening.\n10 THE LAW CLERK: Jury exiting.\n11 (Continued on next page)\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 (Jury not present)\n2 THE COURT: You may step out. Don't discuss your\n3 testimony.\n4 (Witness temporarily excused)\n5 THE COURT: Please be seated. Is there anything that\n6 either party would like to raise before we get started tomorrow\n7 morning?\n8 MS. SHROFF: Your Honor, I just had one matter to\n9 raise if I may. Thank you. Your Honor, given the Court's\n10 admonition to the audience during the time the jury was here, I\n11 respectfully request that the Court just reiterate it now\n12 because there is no jury present. And we would have no\n13 objection just so that the future testimony is not interrupted\n14 in any way, and hopefully things will go smoother. And I don't\n15 have to worry about prejudice to the jury, so I would rather it\n16 happen now.\n17 THE COURT: Under our system of law, a defendant is\n18 entitled to a public trial. That means that anyone can come\n19 and sit and listen. However, you must observe courtroom\n20 decorum. That means not talking, not laughing, not making\n21 faces, not making gestures, just sitting quietly and politely.\n22 Anything further from either side?\n23 MS. SHROFF: No, your Honor.\n24 MR. FINKEL: Your Honor, just briefly. There were two\n25 of the Court's orders that I was referring to in my objection.\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 One was from the robing room the other day, the other -- and I\n2 think the Court recognized this -- is about the sophistication\n3 of the investor issue. And specifically your Honor's ruling at\n4 Docket 319 at page 17, quoting your Honor, \"There is a fine\n5 line between properly asking about an investor's\n6 sophistication, and improperly implying to the jury that the\n7 investor should have found out the truth about the alleged\n8 misrepresentations.\" Granting the government's motion and\n9 permitting the government \"may object at the appropriate time\n10 if the defendants' questions verges to the latter,\" meaning\n11 implying that the victim should have realized that she was\n12 being scammed.\n13 And so the objections for today were overruled.\n14 That's fine. Tomorrow if there's additional lines of\n15 questioning on that, the government will object. The\n16 government reiterates that it would be appropriate in light of\n17 the questioning towards Ms. Chen and other victims and other\n18 witnesses, we ask the Court to consider instructing the jury as\n19 to that, which is that an investor's sophistication is not at\n20 issue. Investors are not held to having to find out that they\n21 were being defrauded. And so we would ask the jury so that\n22 they are not confused as this trial continues and we move into\n23 the defendant's case that your Honor instruct them as to that\n24 matter.\n25 THE COURT: So you have my proposed jury charge which\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\nO6QBGUO4 Chen - Cross\n1 contains a very clear instruction on that issue. Ms. Shroff\n2 has not crossed the line. I feel confident that she will not.\n3 MR. FINKEL: Thank you, your Honor.\n4 THE COURT: Good evening.\n5 MR. FINKEL: Can I ask a question. How much time does\n6 Ms. Shroff have left on the cross?\n7 THE COURT: Ms. Shroff?\n8 MS. SHROFF: Honestly, I'm having difficulty with the\n9 witness, so it could easily be two, two and a half more hours.\n10 THE COURT: How much did you say?\n11 MS. SHROFF: Two hours.\n12 THE COURT: Oh my goodness. That sounds excessive,\n13 really.\n14 MS. SHROFF: She's very combative, your Honor. So I\n15 have to be careful. She could implode at any moment.\n16 THE COURT: I don't have that sense. She comes across\n17 as an intelligent, thoughtful, calm person, so I have no fear\n18 of implosion, so I would ask that you reach for efficiency.\n19 MS. SHROFF: I will try my very best, your Honor.\n20 MR. FINKEL: If it's two hours, two and a half\n21 realistically, your Honor, we're not resting until Friday at\n22 that point. Tuesday, there is no Friday.\n23 THE COURT: We'll have to see. Good evening.\n24 (Adjourned to June 27, 2024, at 9 a.m.)\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\n1 INDEX OF EXAMINATION\n2 Examination of: Page\n3 PAUL HINTON\n4 Direct By Ms. Murray . . . . . . . . . . . . .4355\n5 Cross By Mr. Kamaraju . . . . . . . . . . . .4399\n6 Redirect By Ms. Murray . . . . . . . . . . . .4444\n7 Recross By Mr. Kamaraju . . . . . . . . . . .4458\n8 WEI CHEN\n9 Direct By Mr. Finkel . . . . . . . . . . . . .4459\n10 Cross By Ms. Shroff . . . . . . . . . . . . .4509\n11 GOVERNMENT EXHIBITS\n12 Exhibit No. Received\n13 VB13, VB14, VB24, VB26, VB27, VB29, . . . . .4474\n14 VB31, VB33\n15 VB10-T, VB13-T, VB24-T, VB27-T . . . . . . .4474\n16 Stip 21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4473\n17 VB35 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4483\n18 DEFENDANT EXHIBITS\n19 Exhibit No. Received\n20 DX-11124 through 11129, DX-11255, . . . . . .4401\n21 DX-11432 through 11436,\n22 DX-10299 through DX-10301,\n23 DX-13005 through DX-10329,\n24 DX-10526, DX-10528 through\n25 DX-10530, DX-10551 through\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\n1 DX-10562, DX-10564 through\n2 DX-10577, DX-11299 through\n3 DX-11300, DX-11302, DX-11304\n4 and DX-11305, DX-11485,\n5 DX-11486 through, DX-11488,\n6 DX-11489, DX-11491 through\n7 DX-11492, DX-11548 through\n8 DX-11549, DX-11552 through\n9 DX-11553, DX-11562 through\n10 DX-11570, DX-10430 through\n11 DX-10457, DX-10960 through\n12 DX-10971, DX-11073 through\n13 DX-11078, DX-11110 through\n14 DX-11121, DX-11493 through\n15 DX-11506, DX-10007, DX-10531,\n16 DX-10606 through DX-10626,\n17 DX-10008 through DX-10010,\n18 DX-10330 through DX-10356,\n19 DX-10578 through DX-10605,\n20 DX-11256 through DX-11257,\n21 DX-11281, DX-11517 through\n22 DX-11526, DX-11572 through\n23 DX-11573, DX-11581, DX-11585,\n24 DX-10357 through DX-10359,\n25 DX-10627 through DX-10631,\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300\n\n1 DX-10972, DX-10013, DX-10017\n2 through DX-10028, DX-10360\n3 through DX-10373\n4 7008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4519\n5 7009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4520\n6 7010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4516\n7 7011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4519\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.\n(212) 805-0300","body_zh":null,"key_entities":[],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":47408,"status":"published","published_at":"2024-07-23 00:00:00","created_at":"2024-07-23","updated_at":"2026-07-06 20:52:35"}