{"id":"court_sdny_528_0","court":"SDNY","case_no":"23-cr-00118","doc_number":528,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2025-04-01","title":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA","summary_zh":"非当事人诉讼活动管理令 —— 美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo）案，SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #528（2025年4月1日立案）。法官 Analisa Torres 澄清非当事人在刑事案件中的诉讼权限，驳回多项不当申请，包括 Bei Bei Zhu 要求以自代身份介入和解封被害人名单的动议，以及 Chunk Chyi 近日期内提交的大量不当信件，认定部分内容有骚扰性质；禁止向法官办公室直接发送非诉讼邮件；警告继续违反本令将面临永久禁诉令。","summary_en":"Order Regarding Letters and Motions from Nonparties—United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo/Guo Wengui/郭文贵), SDNY 1:23-cr-00118, ECF #528 (filed April 1, 2025). Judge Analisa Torres establishes parameters for nonparty filings in the criminal case: denies pro se intervention and unsealing motions by Bei Bei Zhu claiming victim status; denies improper daily letter submissions by Chunk Chyi, noting certain filings are potentially threatening or harassing; prohibits unsolicited communications to chambers; warns that further violations may result in a permanent filing injunction.","body_en":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\n\n-against-\n\nMILES GUO, KIN MING JE, and YVETTE WANG,\n\nDefendants.\n\nANALISA TORRES, District Judge:\n\nUSDC SDNYDOCUMENTELECTRONICALLY FILED\n\n| DOC #:      | ________________________________________________________________ |\n|-------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|\n| DATE FILED: | <u>    </u> <u>4/3/2025</u> <u>    </u>                          |\n\n23 Cr. 118 (AT)\n\n## **ORDER REGARDING LETTERS AND MOTIONS FROM NONPARTIES**\n\nThis order concerns certain nonparty filings and email correspondence the Court has received in connection with this case.\n\nThere are four parties to this case: the United States of America, Miles Guo, Kin Ming Je, and Yvette Wang. No other party has standing to intervene in this case or to file any motion, letter, document, or request other than a third-party petition under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), *see United States v. Kozeny*, No. 05 Cr. 518, 2011 WL 1672473, at \\*3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2011), or a motion under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (\"CVRA\"), which applies only to persons \"directly and proximately harmed\" by a defendant's commission of a federal offense, 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A); *see id.* § 3771(a), (d)(3), (d)(6).\n\nBy letter dated April 1, 2025, a nonparty identified as Bei Bei Zhu filed a \"Motion to Intervene Pro Se.\" ECF No. 526 (capitalization altered). The nonparty seeks to intervene to \"[a]ccess relevant evidence and court filings.\" *Id.* at 2. Access to evidence or court filings is not a valid basis to intervene in a criminal case because all court filings and evidence in the record, except materials properly under seal, are available to the public. The nonparty further seeks to intervene to \"[p]rovide evidence that [their] rights have been violated\" and to assert claims related to \"potential victim compensation or asset recovery.\" *Id.* To the extent the nonparty has any such claims, the nonparty may pursue such claims by complying with the procedures set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 853 or the CVRA, which the nonparty has not done here. Finally, the nonparty seeks to intervene to offer \"testimony or evidence\" related to the criminal charges at issue. *Id.* As a nonparty to a criminal case, Bei Bei Zhu lacks standing to intervene for the purpose of offering unsolicited testimony or evidence. Accordingly, the motion at ECF No. 526 is **DENIED**.\n\nThe same nonparty has also filed a motion to \"unseal the list of victims\" in this case. ECF No. 527. In the motion, the nonparty claims to have \"never received a victim notification\" under the CVRA and wishes to know whether the nonparty \"appears in [the Government's] victim list.\" *Id.* at 1. Accordingly, the Court directs the Government to investigate the matter and, if appropriate, to communicate with the nonparty directly. To the extent the nonparty seeks to unseal all sealed or redacted court filings concerning victims' identifying information, the motion is **DENIED** for lack of standing and, alternatively, on the merits.\n\nAnother nonparty identified as Chunk Chyi has filed near-daily letters on the docket for the last two weeks. *See* ECF Nos. 505, 507, 508, 510, 513, 517, 519, 522, 524. With the exception of ECF No. 505, which may be liberally construed as a *pro se* petition under § 853(n), the filings by Chunk Chyi are improper. Chunk Chyi has repeatedly disclaimed victim status, *see, e.g.*, ECF Nos. 513, 517, and numerous of Chunk Chyi's filings concern private matters beyond the scope of this criminal prosecution, *see, e.g.*, ECF Nos. 508, 519, 524. Additionally, certain filings by Chunk Chyi could be construed as threatening or harassing to the Government and the victims of Defendants' crimes. *See, e.g.*, ECF Nos. 517, 522. Accordingly, the nonparty motions at ECF Nos. 508, 510, 519, 522, and 524 are **DENIED**. Any further filings by Chunk Chyi or any alias or representative of Chunk Chyi in violation of this Order or applicable Court rules may be construed as frivolous, vexatious, or harassing, and may subject the filer to a permanent filing injunction.\n\nFinally, the Court has received numerous unsolicited, nonparty email communications made directly to the Chambers email account over the last several months. Such communications are prohibited. Any communications with the Court must be directed to the Clerk of Court and/or the *Pro Se* Intake Unit, and must be filed in accordance with Court rules.\n\nThe Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 508, 510, 524, 526, and 527, and to mail or email a copy of this order to nonparties Bei Bei Zhu and Chunk Chyi.\n\nSO ORDERED.\n\nDated: April 3, 2025 New York, New York\n\nA cursive signature or set of initials.","body_zh":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK（美国纽约南区联邦地区法院）\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA（美利坚合众国）\n\n-诉-\n\nMILES GUO（郭文贵）、KIN MING JE（余建明）及 YVETTE WANG（王雁平），\n\n被告。\n\nANALISA TORRES（阿纳丽莎·托雷斯），地区法官：\n\nUSDC SDNY 电子立案文件\n文件编号：________________________________________________________________\n立案日期：4/3/2025\n\n23 Cr. 118 (AT)\n\n关于非当事人信件及动议的裁定\n\n本裁定涉及本院就本案收到的若干非当事人提交的文件及电子邮件通信。\n\n本案共有四方当事人：美利坚合众国、郭文贵、余建明及王雁平。除依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 提出第三方申诉（参见 United States v. Kozeny，案号 No. 05 Cr. 518, 2011 WL 1672473，第 *3 页 (S.D.N.Y. 2011年4月29日)），或依据《Crime Victims' Rights Act（犯罪受害者权利法）》（简称「CVRA」，该法仅适用于因被告实施联邦罪行而受到「直接且近因损害」的人员，18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A)；参见同法 § 3771(a), (d)(3), (d)(6)）提出动议之外，任何其他方均无资格参与本案诉讼，亦无资格提交任何动议、信件、文件或请求。\n\n在日期为 2025年4月1日 的信件中，一名署名为 Bei Bei Zhu 的非当事人提交了一份「亲历申请参与诉讼动议」。ECF No. 526（大小写已作调整）。该非当事人申请参与诉讼以「查阅相关证据及法院立案文件」。同上，第 2 页。查阅证据或法院立案文件并非参与刑事诉讼的有效依据，因为案卷中的所有法院立案文件和证据，除依法封存的材料外，均向公众开放。该非当事人进一步申请参与诉讼以「提供[其]权利受到侵犯的证据」，并就「潜在受害者赔偿或资产追回」主张权利。同上。若该非当事人确有此类主张，可通过遵守 21 U.S.C. § 853 或 CVRA 规定的程序提出此类主张，但该非当事人在此并未履行相关程序。最后，该非当事人申请参与诉讼以就所涉刑事指控提供「证言或证据」。同上。作为刑事案件的非当事人，Bei Bei Zhu 缺乏以提供未经请求的证言或证据为目的而参与诉讼的诉讼资格。因此，ECF No. 526 处的动议予以驳回。\n\n同一名非当事人还提交了一份要求「启封本案受害者名单」的动议。ECF No. 527。在该动议中，该非当事人声称依据 CVRA「从未收到受害者通知」，并希望了解自己是否「出现在[政府的]受害者名单中」。同上，第 1 页。据此，本院指示政府调查此事，并在适当时直接与该非当事人沟通。在非当事人要求启封所有涉及受害者身份信息的封存或隐名处理的法院立案文件之范围内，该动议因缺乏诉讼资格而被驳回，且在实体审理上亦予以驳回。\n\n另一名署名为 Chunk Chyi 的非当事人在过去两周内几乎每天在案卷中提交信件。参见 ECF Nos. 505, 507, 508, 510, 513, 517, 519, 522, 524。除 ECF No. 505（可宽泛解释为依据 § 853(n) 提出的亲历申诉）外，Chunk Chyi 提交的文件均属不当。Chunk Chyi 反复否认受害者身份，参见例如 ECF Nos. 513, 517，且 Chunk Chyi 提交的大量文件涉及超出本次刑事起诉范围的私事，参见例如 ECF Nos. 508, 519, 524。此外，Chunk Chyi 提交的某些文件可能被视为对政府及被告罪行受害者的威胁或骚扰。参见例如 ECF Nos. 517, 522。因此，ECF Nos. 508, 510, 519, 522 及 524 处的非当事人动议予以驳回。Chunk Chyi 或 Chunk Chyi 的任何别名或代表若进一步提交违反本裁定或适用法院规则的文件，可能被视为轻率无理、无理纠缠或骚扰，并可能导致提交人受到永久禁止立案的禁令约束。\n\n最后，在过去几个月中，本院收到了大量直接发送至法官办公室电子邮箱的未经请求的非当事人电子邮件通信。此类通信系属被禁之列。与本院的任何通信必须发送至法院书记官处和/或亲历立案受理部门，且必须按照法院规则提交。\n\n谨指示法院书记官终止 ECF Nos. 508, 510, 524, 526 及 527 处的动议，并将本裁定副本邮寄或通过电子邮件发送给非当事人 Bei Bei Zhu 和 Chunk Chyi。\n\n特此裁定。\n\n日期：2025年4月3日 纽约州纽约市\n\n草体签名或缩写签名。","key_entities":["Je","CVRA","Pro Se","pro se","Guo","Miles Guo","Kin Ming Je","853(n)","Torres","Analisa Torres","Crime Victim"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":505,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":526,"court":"SDNY"},{"doc_number":527,"court":"SDNY"}],"word_count":761,"status":"published","published_at":"2025-04-01 00:00:00","created_at":"2025-04-01","updated_at":"2026-08-23 07:23:12"}