{"id":"court_sdny_723_0","court":"SDNY","case_no":"23-cr-00118","doc_number":723,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"PETITION","filed_date":null,"title":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK","summary_zh":"第三方异议申请（Ancillary Petition）——美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo）案，SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #723。一位居住重庆、身份信息部分不可读（申请方并要求依联邦刑事诉讼规则 49.1 保密）的申请人援引 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)，就喜马拉雅农场贷款计划、G Club 会员资格及喜马拉雅交易所 HDO 稳定币持仓主张权益；同时质疑康涅狄格州破产法院（案号 22-50073）相关裁定因缺乏正当程序而无效，请求排除由被指为共谋实体（喜马拉雅联盟及关联农场组织）组织提交的债权人主张。","summary_en":"Ancillary petition — United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui), SDNY 1:23-cr-00118, ECF #723. A petitioner residing in Chongqing, whose identifying details are partly unreadable in the filing (and who separately requests privacy protection under Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1), invokes 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) to assert interests in the Himalaya Farm Loan Program, a G Club membership, and HDO stablecoin holdings at Himalaya Exchange, challenges the due-process validity of orders from the Connecticut bankruptcy court (Case No. 22-50073), and asks the Court to exclude creditor claims organized by alleged co-conspirator entities including the Himalaya Alliance and affiliated farm organizations.","body_en":"## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\n\nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK\n\nUnited States of America,\n\nv. Case No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT\n\nHo Wan Kwok a/k/a Miles Guo, et al., Defendants.\n\nPETITION OF THIRD-PARTY CLAIMANT PURSUANT TO 21 U.S.C. § 853(瀁) WITH REQUEST FOR PRIVACY PROTECTION UNDER FED. R. CRIM. P. 49.1\n\nPetitioner , 瀃瀅瀂 瀆濸, 瀃瀈瀅瀆瀈濴瀁瀇 瀇瀂 21 U.S.C. § 853(瀁) 濴瀁濷 F濸濷濸瀅濴濿 R瀈濿濸 瀂濹 C瀅濼瀀濼瀁濴濿 Procedure 32.2, respectfully submits this Petition to assert a legal interest in certain property subject to forfeiture in the above-captioned case. Petitioner also requests protection of personal identifying information under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1 due to safety and harassment concerns. Petitioner states as follows:\n\nI. Background\n\n1. Petitioner is a resident of [Chongqing of China], 瀄瀈濴濿濼濹濼濸濷 瀈瀁濷濸瀅 21 U.S.C. § 853(瀁)(2)\n\nto assert a legal interest in property subject to forfeiture in this case.\n\n2. Petitioner asserts a legal interest in the following property subject to forfeiture:\n\na. Some invested in the Farm Loan Program, for the purpose of earning interest (see Exhibit 2).\n\nb. \\$10,000 for the purchase of one G Club membership card, for the purpose of accessing G Club membership benefits (see Exhibit 3).\n\nc. \\$10,000 deposited into the Himalaya Exchange, resulting in 10,000 HDO stablecoins (see Exhibit 4).\n\n3. This case involves Defendants Ho Wan Kwok (a/k/a Miles Guo), Kin Ming Je, and Yanping Wang, charged with defrauding over \\$1 billion through fraudulent investment schemes, including GTV Media Group, Farm Loan Program, G Club, and Himalaya Exchange. The Government has seized approximately \\$634 million in assets and seeks forfeiture (see ECF No. 19).\n\n4. Petitioner has learned that certain forfeited property may be distributed through bankruptcy proceedings or other claims processes to unqualified claimants, including D濸濹濸瀁濷濴瀁瀇瀆' 濶瀅濸濷濼瀇瀂瀅瀆 瀂瀅 濸瀁瀇濼瀇濼濸瀆/濼瀁濷濼瀉濼濷瀈濴濿瀆 瀆瀈瀆瀃濸濶瀇濸濷 瀂濹 濶瀂瀁瀆瀃濼瀅濼瀁濺 瀊濼瀇濻 D濸濹濸瀁濷濴瀁瀇瀆. S瀈濶濻 distribution, based on procedurally invalid bankruptcy orders or fraudulent claims, would 瀃瀅濸濽瀈濷濼濶濸 P濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁濸瀅'瀆 濿濸濺濼瀇濼瀀濴瀇濸 濼瀁瀇濸瀅濸瀆瀇瀆.\n\nII. Legal Basis\n\n5. P瀈瀅瀆瀈濴瀁瀇 瀇瀂 21 U.S.C. § 853(瀁), 濴瀁y 瀇濻濼瀅濷 瀃濴瀅瀇y 濴瀆瀆濸瀅瀇濼瀁濺 濴 濿濸濺濴濿 濼瀁瀇濸瀅濸瀆瀇 濼瀁 濹瀂瀅濹濸濼瀇濸濷 property may petition the Court for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of their interest. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2 governs the procedures for such ancillary proceedings.\n\n6. Petitioner asserts that their legal interest in the described property is superior to the G瀂瀉濸瀅瀁瀀濸瀁瀇'瀆 濹瀂瀅濹濸濼瀇瀈瀅濸 濶濿濴濼瀀 濴瀁濷 瀆濻瀂瀈濿濷 瀁瀂瀇 濵濸 瀃瀅濸濽瀈濷濼濶濸濷 濵y 瀈瀁瀄瀈濴濿濼濹濼濸濷 濶濿濴濼瀀濴瀁瀇瀆 瀂瀅 procedurally invalid court orders.\n\nIII. Grounds for Petition\n\nA. Invalidity of Bankruptcy Court Orders Due to Lack of Due Process\n\n7. P濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁濸瀅 濻濴瀆 濿濸濴瀅瀁濸濷 瀇濻濴瀇 濶濸瀅瀇濴濼瀁 濶濿濴濼瀀濴瀁瀇瀆, 濼瀁濶濿瀈濷濼瀁濺 D濸濹濸瀁濷濴瀁瀇瀆' 濶瀅濸濷濼瀇瀂瀅瀆, 瀅濸濿y 瀂瀁 orders issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (\n\nCase No. 22-50073.) to assert claims against the property at issue. These orders erroneously 濶濿濴瀆瀆濼濹濼濸濷 濶濸瀅瀇濴濼瀁 瀃瀅瀂瀃濸瀅瀇y, 濼瀁濶濿瀈濷濼瀁濺 瀇濻濸 \"G 瀆濸瀅濼濸瀆\" 濴瀆瀆濸瀇瀆 (濸.濺., GTV M濸濷濼濴 G瀅瀂瀈瀃 瀆瀇瀂濶濾, Himalaya Exchange accounts), as the\n\npersonal property of Defendant Ho Wan Kwok. However, the bankruptcy proceedings suffered from significant procedural deficiencies, including:\n\na. Defendant Ho Wan Kwok was deprived of meaningful participation or an opportunity to be heard in the bankruptcy proceedings;\n\nb. The Bankruptcy Court, absent proper adversarial proceedings, erroneously classified 濶瀂瀁瀇濸瀆瀇濸濷 瀃瀅瀂瀃濸瀅瀇y 濴瀆 D濸濹濸瀁濷濴瀁瀇'瀆 瀃濸瀅瀆瀂瀁濴濿 瀃瀅瀂瀃濸瀅瀇y;\n\nc. The orders failed to adequately consider the legitimate interests of third parties, such as P濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁濸瀅, 濼瀁 瀉濼瀂濿濴瀇濼瀂瀁 瀂濹 濷瀈濸 瀃瀅瀂濶濸瀆瀆 瀃瀅濼瀁濶濼瀃濿濸瀆 瀈瀁濷濸瀅 瀇濻濸 F濼濹瀇濻 A瀀濸瀁濷瀀濸瀁瀇 濴瀁濷 11 U.S.C. § 541.\n\n8. Accordingly, any claims relying on these Bankruptcy Court orders lack legal validity. Petitioner requests that the Court exclude all claims based on such orders. Petitioner further requests that the Court review the docket of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (Case No.22-50073) to verify the procedural deficiencies.\n\nB. Exclusion of Claims by Suspected Conspirators\n\n9. A濶濶瀂瀅濷濼瀁濺 瀇瀂 瀇濻濸 G瀂瀉濸瀅瀁瀀濸瀁瀇'瀆 濹濼濿濼瀁濺瀆 (ECF N瀂瀆. 382, 388, 395), 瀇濻濸 H濼瀀濴濿濴y濴 A濿濿濼濴瀁濶濸 濴瀁濷 H濼瀀濴濿濴y濴 F濴瀅瀀瀆 濴瀅濸 濴濿濿濸濺濸濷 瀇瀂 濵濸 濼瀁瀆瀇瀅瀈瀀濸瀁瀇濴濿濼瀇濼濸瀆 瀂濹 D濸濹濸瀁濷濴瀁瀇瀆' 濹瀅濴瀈濷瀈濿濸瀁瀇 瀆濶濻濸瀀濸瀆, with violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO, 18 U.S.C.\n\n§ 1962) as the primary charge. Entities such as the Himalaya Farms Alliance Committee, Himalaya New York Vanilla Mountain Farm, and Himalaya New York Rock Farm are identified as conspirators or suspected conspirators. Petitioner asserts that certain claimants or entities organized by these groups have submitted claims to seize forfeited property through fraudulent means, as follows:\n\na. These conspirators, as participants in the fraudulent schemes, organized purported \"瀉濼濶瀇濼瀀瀆\" 瀂瀅 \"濶瀅濸濷濼瀇瀂瀅瀆\" 瀇瀂 瀆瀈濵瀀濼瀇 濶濿濴濼瀀瀆, 濼瀁 瀉濼瀂濿濴瀇濼瀂瀁 瀂濹 濽瀈濷濼濶濼濴濿 濸瀇濻濼濶瀆;\n\nb. Recent updates by the Bankruptcy Trustee, Luc A. Despins, significantly reduced the creditor claims, indicating either bad faith by the Trustee or widespread fraudulent or invalid registrations in prior submissions;\n\nc. The creditor registrations organized by these conspirators are fraudulent or invalid, constituting a continuation of their fraudulent conduct to unlawfully seize the property at issue.\n\n10. Petitioner requests that the Court review the legitimacy of all claims organized by these conspirators or their entities, including but not limited to creditors, beneficiaries, or other claimants. If it is illegal, petitioner requests that the court to exclude it.\n\nC. R濸瀄瀈濸瀆瀇 濹瀂瀅 R濸瀉濼濸瀊 瀂濹 瀇濻濸 G瀂瀉濸瀅瀁瀀濸瀁瀇'瀆 C濿濴濼瀀 R濸瀉濼濸瀊 P瀅瀂濶濸瀆瀆\n\n11. B濴瀆濸濷 瀂瀁 瀇濻濸 G瀂瀉濸瀅瀁瀀濸瀁瀇'瀆 濹濼濿濼瀁濺瀆 (ECF N瀂瀆. 382, 388, 395), 瀇濻濸 H濼瀀濴濿濴y濴 A濿濿濼濴瀁濶濸 濴瀁濷 H濼瀀濴濿濴y濴 F濴瀅瀀瀆 濴瀅濸 濴濿濿濸濺濸濷 瀇瀂 濵濸 濼瀁瀆瀇瀅瀈瀀濸瀁瀇濴濿濼瀇濼濸瀆 瀂濹 D濸濹濸瀁濷濴瀁瀇瀆' 濹瀅濴瀈濷, 瀊濼瀇濻 RICO violations as the primary charge. Despite this, the corporate representatives or key personnel of these entities (e.g., Himalaya Farms Alliance Committee, Himalaya New York Vanilla Mountain Farm, Himalaya New York Rock Farm) have not been arrested, and fraudulent activities, such as suspected fraudulent creditor registrations, have continued post-arrest. The Government has failed to adequately pursue criminal liability against these suspected conspirators, allowing fraudulent registrations to unlawfully encroach on forfeited 瀃瀅瀂瀃濸瀅瀇y. P濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁濸瀅 瀅濸瀄瀈濸瀆瀇瀆 瀇濻濴瀇 瀇濻濸 C瀂瀈瀅瀇 瀅濸瀉濼濸瀊 瀊濻濸瀇濻濸瀅 瀇濻濸 G瀂瀉濸瀅瀁瀀濸瀁瀇'瀆 瀃瀅瀂濶濸瀆瀆 濹瀂瀅 reviewing claims in this case complies with due process, particularly whether the Government has adequately scrutinized claims organized by suspected conspirators or their corporate representatives.\n\nIV. Request for Privacy Protection Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1\n\n12. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1, Petitioner respectfully requests 瀇濻濴瀇 瀇濻濸 C瀂瀈瀅瀇 瀅濸濷濴濶瀇 瀂瀅 瀆濸濴濿 P濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁濸瀅'瀆 瀃濸瀅瀆瀂瀁濴濿 濼濷濸瀁瀇濼濹y濼瀁濺 濼瀁濹瀂瀅瀀濴瀇濼瀂瀁, 濼瀁濶濿瀈濷濼瀁濺 濹瀈濿濿 瀁濴瀀濸, address, email address, phone number, and financial account details in Exhibits 2, 3, and 4, from the public docket. Disclosure of such information could expose Petitioner to harassment, identity theft, or personal safety risks due to the high-profile nature of this case 濴瀁濷 P濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁濸瀅'瀆 瀆瀂濶濼濴濿 濸瀁瀉濼瀅瀂瀁瀀濸瀁瀇.\n\nV. Relief Sought\n\nBased on the foregoing, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court issue the following orders:\n\na. Exclude all claims relying on orders issued by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (Case No. 22-50073), as such orders are procedurally invalid due to lack of due process;\n\nb. Exclude all claims organized by Defendants Ho Wan Kwok, Kin Ming Je, Yanping Wang, or their associated conspiratorial entities, including creditors, beneficiaries, or other claimants;\n\n濶. R濸瀉濼濸瀊 瀊濻濸瀇濻濸瀅 瀇濻濸 G瀂瀉濸瀅瀁瀀濸瀁瀇'瀆 瀃瀅瀂濶濸瀆瀆 濹瀂瀅 瀅濸瀉濼濸瀊濼瀁濺 濶濿濴濼瀀瀆 濼瀁 瀇濻濼瀆 濶濴瀆濸 濶瀂瀀瀃濿濼濸瀆 瀊濼瀇濻 due process, particularly with respect to claims organized by suspected conspirators or their corporate representatives;\n\nd. Grant any other relief the Court deems just and proper.\n\nPetitioner requests that the Court rule on this Petition based on the submitted materials or, if 瀁濸濶濸瀆瀆濴瀅y, 瀆濶濻濸濷瀈濿濸 濴 濻濸濴瀅濼瀁濺 瀃瀈瀅瀆瀈濴瀁瀇 瀇瀂 21 U.S.C. § 853(瀁) 瀇瀂 濹瀈瀅瀇濻濸瀅 濴濷濽瀈濷濼濶濴瀇濸 瀇濻濸 claims.\n\nVI. Conclusion\n\nPetitioner seeks to protect their legitimate interests in the forfeited property and prevent unqualified claimants or procedurally invalid orders from prejudicing their rights. Failure to 濶瀂瀁瀆濼濷濸瀅 P濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁濸瀅'瀆 濼瀁瀇濸瀅濸瀆瀇瀆 瀊瀂瀈濿濷 濶濴瀈瀆濸 濼瀅瀅濸瀃濴瀅濴濵濿濸 濻濴瀅瀀 濴瀁濷 瀉濼瀂濿濴瀇濸 濷瀈濸 瀃瀅瀂濶濸瀆瀆 principles.\n\nRes ectfull submitted,\n\n![](_page_2_Picture_14.jpeg)\n\n![](_page_2_Picture_17.jpeg)\n\nDate: August 28, 2025\n\n## VERIFICATION\n\nI 濴瀇瀇濸瀆瀇 濴瀁濷 濷濸濶濿濴瀅濸 瀈瀁濷濸瀅 瀃濸瀁濴濿瀇y 瀂濹 瀃濸瀅濽瀈瀅y, 瀃瀈瀅瀆瀈濴瀁瀇 瀇瀂 28 U.S.C. § 1746, 瀇濻濴瀇 瀀y 瀃濸瀇濼瀇濼瀂瀁 is not frivolous and the information provided in support of my petition is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.\n\nExecuted on August 28, 2025, in\n\n![](_page_3_Picture_4.jpeg)","body_zh":"美国联邦地区法院（UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT）\n\n纽约南区（SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK）\n\n美利坚合众国（United States of America），\n\n诉 案号：Case No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT\n\nHo Wan Kwok（郭文贵，又名 Miles Guo）等人，被告。\n\n第三人权利主张人依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 提起的申请书及依据联邦刑事诉讼规则（FED. R. CRIM. P.）第 49.1 条请求隐私保护的申请\n\n申请人亲自行事（pro se），依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 及《联邦刑事诉讼规则》（Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure）第 32.2 条，谨提交本申请书，对上述标题案件中应予没收的特定财产主张法律权益。出于安全和防范骚扰的考虑，申请人亦依据《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 49.1 条请求对其个人身份识别信息予以保护。申请人陈述如下：\n\n一、 背景\n\n1. 申请人为[中国重庆（Chongqing of China）]居民，符合 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2) 的资格，可在本案中对应予没收的财产主张法律权益。\n\n2. 申请人对以下应予没收的财产主张法律权益：\n\na. 投资于农场贷款项目（Farm Loan Program）的部分款项，旨在赚取利息（见附件 2 / Exhibit 2）。\n\nb. 用于购买一张 G Club 会员卡的 $10,000，旨在获取 G Club 会员权益（见附件 3 / Exhibit 3）。\n\nc. 存入喜马拉雅交易所（Himalaya Exchange）的 $10,000，折合为 10,000 枚 HDO 稳定币（见附件 4 / Exhibit 4）。\n\n3. 本案涉及被告 Ho Wan Kwok（又名 Miles Guo）、Kin Ming Je（余建明）和 Yanping Wang（王雁平），其被指控通过包括 GTV Media Group、农场贷款项目、G Club 和喜马拉雅交易所在内的欺诈性投资计划诈骗超过 $1 billion。政府已扣押约 $634 million 资产并申请没收（见 ECF No. 19）。\n\n4. 申请人获悉，某些被没收财产可能会通过破产程序或其他索赔程序分配给不合格的权利主张人，包括被告的债权人或涉嫌与被告共谋的实体/个人。基于程序无效的破产裁定或欺诈性主张的此类分配将损害申请人的合法权益。\n\n二、 法律依据\n\n5. 依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)，任何对被没收财产主张法律权益的第三方均可向法院申请举行听证会，以判定其权益的有效性。《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 32.2 条管辖此类附带程序的程序规则。\n\n6. 申请人主张，其在所述财产中的法律权益优于政府的没收主张，且不应受到不合格权利主张人或程序无效的法院命令的损害。\n\n三、 申请理由\n\nA. 因缺乏正当程序导致破产法院命令无效\n\n7. 申请人获悉，某些权利主张人（包括被告的债权人）依据美国康涅狄格区破产法院（United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut，案号：Case No. 22-50073）作出的命令，对涉案财产提出主张。这些命令错误地将特定财产（包括“G 系列 / G series”资产，例如 GTV Media Group 股票、喜马拉雅交易所账户）归类为被告 Ho Wan Kwok 的个人财产。然而，破产程序存在重大程序缺陷，包括：\n\na. 被告 Ho Wan Kwok 在破产程序中被剥夺了实质性参与或陈述意见的机会；\n\nb. 破产法院在缺乏适当对抗性程序的情况下，错误地将争议财产归类为被告的个人财产；\n\nc. 上述命令未能充分考虑如申请人等第三方的合法权益，违反了《第五修正案》（Fifth Amendment）及 11 U.S.C. § 541 下的正当程序原则。\n\n8. 因此，任何依赖这些破产法院命令的权利主张均缺乏法律效力。申请人请求法院排除所有基于此类命令的主张。申请人进一步请求法院审查美国康涅狄格区破产法院的案件案卷（Case No. 22-50073），以核实程序缺陷。\n\nB. 排除涉嫌共谋者的权利主张\n\n9. 根据政府提交的文件（ECF Nos. 382, 388, 395），喜马拉雅联盟（Himalaya Alliance）和喜马拉雅农场（Himalaya Farms）涉嫌为被告欺诈计划的工具，主要指控为违反《反勒索及受贿组织法》（Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act，简称 RICO，18 U.S.C. § 1962）。喜马拉雅农场联盟委员会（Himalaya Farms Alliance Committee）、喜马拉雅纽约香草山农场（Himalaya New York Vanilla Mountain Farm）和喜马拉雅纽约磐石农场（Himalaya New York Rock Farm）等实体被认定为共谋者或涉嫌共谋者。申请人主张，由这些群体组织的某些权利主张人或实体已通过欺诈手段提交主张以侵吞被没收财产，具体如下：\n\na. 这些共谋者作为欺诈计划的参与者，组织所谓的“受害者”或“债权人”提交主张，违反了司法伦理；\n\nb. 破产受托人（Bankruptcy Trustee）Luc A. Despins 的最新更新大幅减少了债权人主张，这表明要么受托人存在恶意，要么先前提交的内容中存在广泛的欺诈或无效登记；\n\nc. 这些共谋者组织的债权人登记属于欺诈或无效，构成了其非法侵吞涉案财产的欺诈行为的延续。\n\n10. 申请人请求法院审查由这些共谋者或其下属实体组织的所有权利主张的合法性，包括但不限于债权人、受益人或其他权利主张人。若属非法，申请人请求法院予以排除。\n\nC. 请求审查政府的权利主张审查程序\n\n11. 根据政府提交的文件（ECF Nos. 382, 388, 395），喜马拉雅联盟和喜马拉雅农场涉嫌为被告欺诈行为的工具，主要指控为违反 RICO。尽管如此，这些实体（例如喜马拉雅农场联盟委员会、喜马拉雅纽约香草山农场、喜马拉雅纽约磐石农场）的法定代表人或关键人员尚未被捕，且在逮捕后诸如涉嫌欺诈性债权人登记等欺诈活动仍在继续。政府未能充分追究这些涉嫌共谋者的刑事责任，导致欺诈性登记非法侵吞被没收财产。申请人请求法院审查政府在本案中审查权利主张的程序是否符合正当程序，特别是政府是否对涉嫌共谋者或其法定代表人组织的权利主张进行了充分审查。\n\n四、 依据联邦刑事诉讼规则第 49.1 条请求隐私保护\n\n12. 依据《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 49.1 条，申请人谨请求法院从公开案卷中隐匿或封存申请人的个人身份识别信息，包括附件 2、3 和 4 中的全名、地址、电子邮件地址、电话号码及财务账户详情。由于本案备受关注的性质及申请人的社会环境，披露此类信息可能会使申请人面临骚扰、身份盗用或人身安全风险。\n\n五、 诉求救济\n\n基于上述理由，申请人谨请求法院作出以下命令：\n\na. 排除所有依赖美国康涅狄格区破产法院（Case No. 22-50073）所发命令的权利主张，因为此类命令因缺乏正当程序而在程序上无效；\n\nb. 排除由被告 Ho Wan Kwok、Kin Ming Je、Yanping Wang 或其关联共谋实体组织的所有权利主张，包括债权人、受益人或其他权利主张人；\n\nc. 审查政府在本案中审查权利主张的程序是否符合正当程序，特别是关于涉嫌共谋者或其法定代表人所组织的权利主张；\n\nd. 准予法院认为公正且适当的任何其他救济。\n\n申请人请求法院根据提交的材料对本申请作出裁定，或者在必要时，依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 排定听证会以进一步审理相关权利主张。\n\n六、 结论\n\n申请人旨在保护其在被没收财产中的合法权益，并防止不合格的权利主张人或程序无效的命令损害其权利。若未能考虑申请人的权益，将造成无法弥补的损害并违反正当程序原则。\n\n谨此提交，\n\n[_page_2_Picture_14.jpeg]\n\n[_page_2_Picture_17.jpeg]\n\n日期：August 28, 2025\n\n证实声明（VERIFICATION）\n\n本人依据 28 U.S.C. § 1746 证明并在受伪证罪处罚的原则下声明：本人的申请并非无理取闹，且就本人所知及所信，为支持本人申请所提供的信息均属真实准确。\n\n签署于 August 28, 2025，地点：\n\n[_page_3_Picture_4.jpeg]","key_entities":["Himalaya","Kwok","Ho Wan Kwok","Je","forfeiture","Himalaya Exchange","Guo","Miles Guo","Yanping Wang","Kin Ming Je","GTV","Farm Loan","RICO","CIPA","Despins"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":19,"court":"SDNY"}],"word_count":1290,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 07:26:36"}