{"id":"court_sdny_726_0","court":"SDNY","case_no":"23-cr-00118","doc_number":726,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"OPINION","filed_date":null,"title":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Plaintiff,","summary_zh":"第三方财产权请愿书 —— 美国诉Miles Guo等人案，SDNY 1:23-cr-00118，ECF #726（2025年9月4日）。申请人Carolyn Sun根据21 U.S.C. § 853(n)主张对G-Club会员资格拥有独立权益，称其支付系善意行为且无知于任何非法性或没收风险，同时反对由Himalaya Alliance和Himalaya Farm领导人发起的竞争性索赔（法庭曾认定为可能共谋者），请求法庭认可其地位并对个人信息提供隐名保护。","summary_en":"Third-Party Petition under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) — United States v. Miles Guo, et al., SDNY 1:23-cr-00118, ECF #726 (September 4, 2025). Petitioner Carolyn Sun claims bona fide purchaser interest in G-Club membership among forfeited assets, asserts good-faith acquisition with no knowledge of illegality, and objects to competing claims by Himalaya Alliance and Himalaya Farm-affiliated parties (previously identified by Court as possible co-conspirators), requests standing recognition and privacy protection for personal identifying information.","body_en":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK United States of America, Plaintiff,\n\nv.\n\nMiles Guo, et al. Defendant.\n\nCase No. 23-cr-00118 (AT)\n\n## **PETITION UNDER 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)**\n\n### **I. Background**\n\n- 1. I previously filed a motion asking the Court to clarify the meaning of \"victim\", since I believed I had received fair value for my G-club membership fees. That motion was denied, and I withdrew it, mistakenly thinking I had no standing.\n- 2. I now understand I may file under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) as a third party with an interest in forfeited property. If § 853(n) does not apply, I reserve the right to assert CVRA protections.\n- 3. I do not endorse the prosecution's theory of this case and express no opinion about the Defendant's guilt or innocence.\n\n#### **II. Interest in Property**\n\n- 1. I paid \\$20,500 in G-club membership fees, which are among the restrained assets.\n- 2. I claim standing as a bona fide purchaser for value, without knowledge of illegality or forfeiture risk.\n\n### **III. Opposition to Other Claims**\n\n1. I object to two categories of claims:\n\na. Creditor registrations filed in the bankruptcy case of the Defendant, which the Court has already ruled were baseless and an obstruction of justice.\n\nb. Claims organized or promoted by Himalaya Alliance or Himalaya Farm leaders, including those represented by Attorney Greyer. The Court has recognized these leaders as possible co-conspirators of the Defendant.\n\n2. These claims should not dilute the asset pool or affect legitimate petitions.\n\n## **IV. Privacy and Redaction**\n\nI respectfully request permission to redact my living address, phone number, email address and financial information from the public docket. This is consistent with Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1 and the Court's authority to protect privacy and safety. See *Lugosch v. Pyramid Co.*, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Because this is a high-profile case with contentious competing claimants, I ask that my contact information be provided only through non-public channels.\n\n# **V. Relief Requested**\n\nPetitioner respectfully asks the Court to:\n\n- 1. Recognize standing under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n);\n- 2. Exclude creditor registrations already deemed baseless and obstruction of justice;\n- 3. Exclude claims organized or promoted by Himalaya Alliance or Farm leaders, including those represented by Attorney Greyer;\n- 4. In the alternative, if § 853(n) does not apply, allow Petitioner to assert rights under the CVRA;\n- 5. Grant the request to redact personal identifying information from public filings; and\n- 6. Provide any further relief the Court finds just.\n\n## **VI. Declaration**\n\nI, Carolyn Sun, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.\n\nExecuted on: 09/04/2025\n\nCarolyn Sun\n\n![](_page_1_Picture_15.jpeg)","body_zh":"UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK（美国纽约南区联邦地区法院）\nUnited States of America（美利坚合众国），原告，\n\nv.\n\nMiles Guo（郭文贵）等，被告。\n\n案号：23-cr-00118 (AT)\n\n依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 提起的请愿书\n\nI. 背景\n\n- 1. 本人此前曾提出动议，请求法院澄清“受害者”的含义，因为本人认为本人的 G-club 会费已获得合理对价。该动议被驳回，且本人误以为自己没有诉讼资格而撤回了该动议。\n- 2. 本人现已明白，本人可以作为对被没收财产享有权益的第三方，依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 提起申请。若 § 853(n) 不适用，本人保留主张 CVRA（《犯罪受害者权利法》）保护的权利。\n- 3. 本人不认可检方在本案中的指控逻辑，并对被告是否有罪不发表意见。\n\nII. 财产权益\n\n- 1. 本人支付了 $20,500 的 G-club 会费，该款项属于被限制的资产之一。\n- 2. 本人主张作为善意有偿取得人享有诉讼资格，且对违法行为或被没收风险不知情。\n\nIII. 对其他权利主张的异议\n\n1. 本人对两类权利主张提出异议：\n\na. 在被告破产案件中提交的债权人登记，法院此前已裁定这些登记毫无依据且构成妨碍司法公正。\n\nb. 由 Himalaya Alliance（喜马拉雅联盟）或 Himalaya Farm（喜马拉雅农场）负责人组织或推广的主张，包括由 Greyer 律师（Attorney Greyer）代表的主张。法院已认定这些负责人可能是被告的共谋者。\n\n2. 这些主张不应稀释资产池或影响合法的请愿。\n\nIV. 隐私与遮掩处理\n\n本人谨请求允许在公开案卷中遮掩本人的居住地址、电话号码、电子邮件地址及财务信息。这符合 Fed. R. Crim. P. 49.1（《联邦刑事诉讼规则》第 49.1 条）以及法院保护隐私和安全的权力。参见 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co., 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)。由于这是一起备受瞩目且存在争议性竞争主张者的案件，本人请求本人的联系方式仅通过非公开渠道提供。\n\nV. 请求的救济\n\n请愿人谨请求法院：\n\n- 1. 确认依据 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) 享有的诉讼资格；\n- 2. 排除已被认定为毫无依据且妨碍司法公正的债权人登记；\n- 3. 排除由喜马拉雅联盟或农场负责人组织或推广的主张，包括由 Greyer 律师代表的主张；\n- 4. 作为备位请求，若 § 853(n) 不适用，允许请愿人主张 CVRA 项下的权利；\n- 5. 准予在公开归档文件中遮掩个人身份信息的请求；以及\n- 6. 提供法院认为公正的任何其他救济。\n\nVI. 声明\n\n本人 Carolyn Sun（孙卡罗琳），在了解若做伪证将受合众国法律惩处的情况下声明，据本人所知所信，上述内容真实且准确无误。\n\n签署日期：09/04/2025\n\nCarolyn Sun\n\n[签名图片]","key_entities":["853(n)","Himalaya","Himalaya Alliance","CVRA","Guo","Miles Guo","Je","forfeiture"],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":464,"status":"published","published_at":null,"created_at":null,"updated_at":"2026-08-23 07:21:12"}