{"id":"court_sdny_767_0","court":"SDNY","case_no":"23-cr-00118","doc_number":767,"sub_number":0,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2025-11-26","title":"Case: 25-2726, 11/26/2025, DktEntry: 20.1, Page 1 of 2 Case 1:23-cr-00118-AT Document 767 Filed 11/26/25 Page 1 of 2","summary_zh":"美国第二巡回法院裁定令 —— 美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo）案下级法院诉讼案号 1:23-cr-00118，第二巡回案号 25-2726 ECF 767（2025年11月26日）。法院驳回自诉人 Ranyue Bai 的人身保护令申请，理由为申请人未能证明其权利明确且不可争议。","summary_en":"United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Order — related to United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (also known as Guo Wengui, Miles Guo), District Court Case No. 1:23-cr-00118, Second Circuit Case No. 25-2726, ECF No. 767 (filed November 26, 2025). The Court denies pro se petitioner Ranyue Bai's petition for writ of mandamus, finding that petitioner has not demonstrated that his right to the writ is clear and indisputable.","body_en":"S.D.N.Y. – N.Y.C. 23-cr-118 Torres, J.\n\n## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nAt a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 26th day of November, two thousand twenty-five.\n\nPresent:\n\nDennis Jacobs, Joseph F. Bianco, *Circuit Judges*, Victor A. Bolden, *District Judge.\\**\n\nIn Re: Ranyue Bai, 25-2726\n\n25-212\n\n*Petitioner*.\n\nPetitioner, pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to cease suppressing his future filings, docket his submitted but undocketed motions, and rule on his pending Rule 60(d)(3) motion. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the mandamus petition is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that his right to the writ is clear and indisputable, and that granting the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. *See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C.*, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004).\n\nIn view of the large number of submissions received by the district court, which we trust the court will address expeditiously, Petitioner's mandamus petition as to docketing his submissions is denied without prejudice to renewal if the district court fails to docket the submissions within a reasonable time.\n\n<sup>\\*</sup> Judge Victor A. Bolden, of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.\n\nLikewise, the denial as to his Rule 60(d)(3) motion is without prejudice to renewal if the district court fails to take action within a reasonable time after sentencing in the underlying criminal case. *See Cheney*, 542 U.S. at 380–81; *United States v. Magassouba*, 544 F.3d 387, 411 n.16 (2d Cir. 2008).\n\n2\n\nFOR THE COURT: Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court\n\nCatherine O'Hoppe Wolfe\n\nUNITED STATES\nSECOND CIRCUIT\nCOURT OF APPEALS\n\nA True Copy\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk\nUnited States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe","body_zh":"S.D.N.Y.（纽约南区联邦地区法院）– N.Y.C.（纽约市）23-cr-118 Torres（托雷斯）法官\n\nUnited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit（美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院） _________________\n\n美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院于二〇二五年十一月二十六日在纽约市弗利广场40号瑟古德·马歇尔美国法院大楼举行的定期开庭期中。\n\n出席法官：\n\nDennis Jacobs（丹尼斯·雅各布斯）、Joseph F. Bianco（约瑟夫·F·比安科），巡回法官；Victor A. Bolden（维克多·A·博尔登），地区法官。*\n\n案件：Ranyue Bai（白冉月），25-2726\n\n25-212\n\n请愿人。\n\n请愿人以本人诉讼（pro se）身份提交了一份调卷令/执行令（writ of mandamus，职务履行令）请愿书，请求指示地区法院停止压制其未来提交的文件，将其已提交但未登记入卷的动议登记入卷，并对其待决的《联邦民事诉讼规则》第 60(d)(3) 条动议作出裁定。经审慎考虑，现裁定驳回该职务履行令请愿书，因为请愿人未能证明其获得该令状的权利是清楚且无可争议的，且未能证明在该情形下准予该令状是适当的。参见 Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004)。\n\n鉴于地区法院收到的大量提交文件（本院相信地区法院将迅速处理这些文件），请愿人关于将其提交文件登记入卷的职务履行令请愿书予以驳回，但若地区法院未在合理时间内将提交文件登记入卷，则不影响其重新提出。\n\n* 维克多·A·博尔登法官，来自 United States District Court for the District of Connecticut（美国康涅狄格区联邦地区法院），经指定出庭。\n\n同样，关于其第 60(d)(3) 条动议的驳回，若地区法院在基础刑事案件判决后未在合理时间内采取行动，亦不影响其重新提出。参见 Cheney, 542 U.S. at 380–81；United States v. Magassouba, 544 F.3d 387, 411 n.16 (2d Cir. 2008)。\n\n代表法院：Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe（凯瑟琳·奥哈根·沃尔夫），法院书记官\n\nCatherine O'Hoppe Wolfe\n\n美国\n第二巡回\n上诉法院\n\n真实副本\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe，书记官\n美国联邦第二巡回上诉法院\nCatherine O'Hagan Wolfe","key_entities":["Torres","Pro Se","pro se"],"ecf_references":[{"doc_number":20,"court":"SDNY"}],"word_count":320,"status":"published","published_at":"2025-11-26 00:00:00","created_at":"2025-11-26","updated_at":"2026-08-23 07:19:58"}