{"id":"court_sdny_81_4","court":"SDNY","case_no":"23-cr-00118","doc_number":81,"sub_number":4,"doc_type":"ORDER","filed_date":"2023-06-05","title":"EXHIBIT A United States v. Yanping Wang*, Case No.: S1 23-CR-118 (AT)","summary_zh":"禁止令 —— 美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo）案，SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #81（2023-06-05）。纽约州法院 2020 年 5 月的禁止令作为证物，禁止被告 Xianmin Xiong 骚扰、威胁 Yanping Wang 或出现在其工作地点和住所附近。","summary_en":"Order of Protection —— United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (Guo Wengui / Miles Guo), SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #81 (filed 2023-06-05). A May 2020 New York state court order submitted as evidence enjoining defendant Xianmin Xiong from harassing, threatening, or appearing near the residence and workplace of Yanping Wang.","body_en":"# EXHIBIT A\n\n*United States v. Yanping Wang*, Case No.: S1 23-CR-118 (AT)\n\n## **SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY**\n\n| <b>PRESENT:</b>                                                                    | <b>HON. BARBARA JAFFE</b> |  | <b>PART</b>            | <b>IAS MOTION 12EFM</b> |\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------|--|------------------------|-------------------------|\n|                                                                                    | <i>Justice</i>            |  |                        |                         |\n| ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X |                           |  | <b>INDEX NO.</b>       | 157786/2019             |\n| YANPING WANG a/k/a YVETTE WANG,                                                    |                           |  | <b>MOTION DATE</b>     | N/A                     |\n| Plaintiff,                                                                         |                           |  | <b>MOTION SEQ. NO.</b> | 003                     |\n| - V -                                                                              |                           |  |                        |                         |\n\n## XIANMIN XIONG a/k/a XI NUO a/k/a SINO, XIA YELIANG, LI HONGKUAN, GAO BINGCHEN,\n\n### **DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION**\n\nDefendants.\n\n---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X\n\nThe following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 39-46 were read on this motion for order of protection .\n\nOn September 11, 2019, the parties entered into a so-ordered stipulation whereby defendant agreed not to \"appear or linger outside\" plaintiff's place of employment except to the extent of \"brief or innocent passing\" . . . \"if for legitimate reasons for the party's business.\" Plaintiff also agreed that she would refrain from engaging in the same conduct outside defendant's residence with the same exception. (NYSCEF 20).\n\nBy email to the court's Ex Parte Office, dated Friday, April 26 at 5:36 pm, plaintiff sought authorization, pursuant to AO-78-20, to obtain by order to show cause an order \"enjoining defendant from harassing, confronting, threatening or intimidating [her] or \"appearing in the immediate vicinity of [her] work place or residence\" and from \"making death threats of bodily injury against [her], including without limitation, in person or through any media.\"\n\nBy affidavit dated April 24, 2020, plaintiff alleges the following:\n\n(1) On April 4, 2020, defendant took photographs through the first-floor window of her office and posted them on Twitter.\n\n(2) On April 6, 2020, defendant was outside her office, taking photographs of her and threatening to kill her if she continued to work for a certain nonparty. She called the police who arrived during the incident. The officers told her that they are conducting an ongoing investigation of defendant. She showed them the so-ordered stipulation and they directed defendant to leave immediately. She filed a police report. Soon thereafter, after having seen defendant use his phone, another individual arrived at the scene and engaged in the same conduct engaged in by defendant. Defendant posted a video on Twitter of himself outside plaintiff's office and encouraged viewers to join in his threatening conduct against her.\n\n(3) On April 8, 2020, defendant posted on Twitter the photographs he had taken of plaintiff.\n\nA video conference was held with the parties on April 28 in an effort to settle the application. Defense counsel agreed that he would advise his client to comply with the soordered stipulation. Plaintiff's counsel reiterated the need for further injunctive relief.\n\nAs plaintiff seeks relief from conduct that is not encompassed by the so-ordered stipulation, namely \"harassing, confronting, threatening or intimidating\" and \"making death threats of bodily injury against [her], including without limitation, in person or through any media,\" and given the seriousness of defendant's alleged recent conduct, on April 29, I deemed this application essential within the meaning of AO-78-20. (NYSCEF 43). Plaintiff then efiled her order to show cause which I signed, giving defendant until 5 pm on May 6, 2020 to efile his opposition. (NYSCEF 44).\n\nIn opposing the application, defendant offers counsel's statement and a memorandum of law based thereon, several photographs with captions, and several signed statements. (NYSCEF 45, 46). The statement of counsel consists of unaffirmed factual allegations with no asserted\n\nbasis of knowledge; none of the photographs are authenticated; none of the statements are notarized. Consequently, none of defendant's submissions is considered, except to the extent that defendant therein admits that he violated the so-ordered stipulation by seeking to excuse it.\n\nAccordingly, it is hereby\n\nORDERED, that upon plaintiff's service of a copy of this order with notice of entry on defendant and in addition to the injunctive relief stipulated to on September 11, 2019, defendant Xianmin Xiong a/k/a Xi Nuo a/k/a Sino is immediately enjoined from harassing, confronting, threatening or intimidating plaintiff YanPing Wang a/k/a Yvette Wang; and it is further\n\nORDERED, that defendant Xianmin Xiong a/k/a Xi Nuo a/k/a Sino is also enjoined from appearing in the immediate vicinity of plaintiff YanPing Wang a/k/a Yvette Wang's residence and from making death threats of bodily injury against her, including without limitation, in person or through any media.\n\n  **5/7/2020** **DATE**   20200507104500BJAFFE501A12D2478C4A1A9B92A598F00BBC6 **BARBARA JAFFE, J.S.C.**\n\n| <b>CHECK ONE:</b>            |          | CASE DISPOSED              | <b>X</b> | NON-FINAL DISPOSITION |  |                 |  |           |\n|------------------------------|----------|----------------------------|----------|-----------------------|--|-----------------|--|-----------|\n|                              | <b>X</b> | GRANTED                    |          | DENIED                |  | GRANTED IN PART |  | OTHER     |\n| <b>APPLICATION:</b>          |          | SETTLE ORDER               |          | SUBMIT ORDER          |  |                 |  |           |\n| <b>CHECK IF APPROPRIATE:</b> |          | INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN |          | FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT |  |                 |  | REFERENCE |","body_zh":"附件 A\n\nUnited States v. Yanping Wang（美国诉王雁平案），案号：S1 23-CR-118 (AT)\n\nSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY（纽约州最高法院纽约县分院）\n\n出席法官：BARBARA JAFFE（芭芭拉·贾菲）法官 审判庭：IAS MOTION 12EFM\n法官\n---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X\nYANPING WANG a/k/a YVETTE WANG（王雁平，又名伊薇特·王），\n原告，\n案号：157786/2019\n动议日期：不适用\n动议序号：003\n- 对 -\nXIANMIN XIONG a/k/a XI NUO a/k/a SINO, XIA YELIANG, LI HONGKUAN, GAO BINGCHEN（熊宪民，又名西诺，又名Sino；夏业良；李洪宽；高冰尘），\n被告。\n关于动议的决定与裁定\n---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X\n\n本院在审理此项保护令动议时，审阅了按 NYSCEF 文件编号列出的以下电子归档文件（动议 003）39-46。\n\n2019年9月11日，各方当事人签署了一份经法院签署认可的协议，据此被告同意不得在原告的工作场所外“出现或徘徊”，除非是“出于该当事人的正当业务理由”而进行的“短暂或无意经过”……原告亦同意，在相同例外情况下，其不得在被告住所外从事相同行为。（NYSCEF 20）。\n\n原告于4月26日（星期五）下午5点36分向法院单方动议办公室发送电子邮件，根据 AO-78-20 寻求授权，以通过要求说明理由的命令来获取一项裁定，“禁止被告对[其]进行骚扰、对质、威胁或恐吓”，或“出现在[其]工作场所或住所的紧邻区域”，以及“对[其]发出造成人身伤害的死亡威胁，包括但不限于当面或通过任何媒体进行”。\n\n在日期为2020年4月24日的宣誓书里，原告陈述了以下事实：\n\n(1) 2020年4月4日，被告通过原告办公室一楼的窗户拍照，并发布在 Twitter（推特）上。\n\n(2) 2020年4月6日，被告在原告办公室外对其拍照，并威胁称如果她继续为某非当事人工作就将其杀害。原告报了警，警员在事件发生期间抵达。警员告诉原告，他们正在对被告进行调查。原告向警员出示了经法院签署认可的协议，警员责令被告立即离开。原告提交了警方报案记录。此后不久，在目睹被告使用手机后，另一名人员抵达现场并从事了与被告相同的行为。被告在推特上发布了其自己在原告办公室外的视频，并鼓动观看者加入其对原告的威胁行为中。\n\n(3) 2020年4月8日，被告在推特上发布了他所拍摄的原告照片。\n\n2020年4月28日与各方当事人举行了视频会议，试图解决该申请。辩护律师同意其将建议其当事人遵守经法院签署认可的协议。原告律师重申了需要进一步禁令救济的主张。\n\n鉴于原告寻求救济所针对的行为未被经法院签署认可的协议涵盖，即“骚扰、对质、威胁或恐吓”以及“对[其]发出造成人身伤害的死亡威胁，包括但不限于当面或通过任何媒体进行”，且鉴于被告近期被指控行为的严重性，我于4月29日认定本项申请属于 AO-78-20 含义范围内的必要紧急事项。（NYSCEF 43）。随后原告电子归档了其要求说明理由的命令，我签署了该命令，限定被告在2020年5月6日下午5点前电子归档其反对意见。（NYSCEF 44）。\n\n在反对该申请时，被告提交了律师陈述及以此为依据的法律备忘录、若干附有说明的照片以及若干份签署的陈述。（NYSCEF 45, 46）。律师陈述包含未作宣誓的事实指控，且未声明知情依据；所有照片均未经过认证；所有陈述均未作公证。因此，对被告提交的所有材料均不予考虑，但在被告试图为自己开脱而承认其违反了经法院签署认可的协议的范围内除外。\n\n据此，特此\n\n裁定：在原告向被告送达附有录入通知的本裁定副本后，且在2019年9月11日协议约定的禁令救济之外，立即禁止被告 Xianmin Xiong a/k/a Xi Nuo a/k/a Sino 对原告 YanPing Wang a/k/a Yvette Wang 进行骚扰、对质、威胁或恐吓；并进一步\n\n裁定：亦禁止被告 Xianmin Xiong a/k/a Xi Nuo a/k/a Sino 出现在原告 YanPing Wang a/k/a Yvette Wang 住所的紧邻区域，并禁止其对原告发出造成人身伤害的死亡威胁，包括但不限于当面或通过任何媒体进行。\n\n日期：5/7/2020 20200507104500BJAFFE501A12D2478C4A1A9B92A598F00BBC6 BARBARA JAFFE, J.S.C.（纽约州最高法院法官芭芭拉·贾菲）\n\n勾选一项：案件已结案 [ ] 非最终处置 [X]\n准予 [X] 驳回 [ ] 部分准予 [ ] 其他 [ ]\n申请：拟定裁定书 [ ] 提交裁定书 [ ]\n如适用请勾选：包含移交/重新分配 [ ] 受托人指定 [ ] 移交裁判员 [ ]","key_entities":["Yanping Wang"],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":822,"status":"published","published_at":"2023-06-05 00:00:00","created_at":"2023-06-05","updated_at":"2026-08-23 07:24:27"}