{"id":"court_sdny_81_5","court":"SDNY","case_no":"23-cr-00118","doc_number":81,"sub_number":5,"doc_type":"JUDGMENT","filed_date":"2023-06-05","title":"EXHIBIT B United States v. Yanping Wang*, Case No.: S1 23-CR-118 (AT)","summary_zh":"传票与投诉 —— 美国诉 Ho Wan Kwok（郭文贵 / Guo Wengui / Miles Guo）案，SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #81（2023-06-05）。纽约州民事诉讼初始文件作为证物，Yanping Wang 指控 Xianmin Xiong 进行网络诽谤、骚扰和跟踪威胁。","summary_en":"Summons and Verified Complaint —— United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (Guo Wengui / Miles Guo), SDNY 1:23-cr-00118 ECF #81 (filed 2023-06-05). Initiating documents of a New York state civil action submitted as evidence in which Yanping Wang alleges online defamation, harassment, and threatening stalking by Xianmin Xiong.","body_en":"# EXHIBIT B\n\n*United States v. Yanping Wang*, Case No.: S1 23-CR-118 (AT)\n\n### SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK\n\nYANPING WANG a/k/a YVETTE WANG,\n\nPlaintiff,\n\nv.\n\nXIANMIN XIONG a/k/a XI NUO a/k/a SINO,\n\nDefendant.\n\nIndex No.: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_ Date Purchased: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nPlaintiff designates New York County as the place of trial.\n\nThe Basis of the venue is Plaintiff's place of residence (New York County) pursuant to CPLR 503(a)\n\n### **SUMMONS**\n\n### **TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:**\n\n**YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED** to answer the Verified Complaint in this action and to serve a copy of your answer on the Plaintiff's attorneys indicated below, within 20 days after the service of this summons, exclusive of the day of service (or within 30 days after the service is complete if this summons is not personally delivered to you within the State of New York); and in case of your failure to appear or answer, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded herein.\n\nDated: New York, New York August 8, 2019\n\nTO: Xianmin Xiong 136-84 Roosevelt Avenue, Apt. A83 Flushing, New York 11354\n\n### **CATAFAGO FINI LLP**\n\n/s/ Tom M. Fini\n\nTom M. Fini, Esq. Jacques Catafago, Esq. The Empire State Building 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7710 New York, NY 10118 212-239-9669 tom@catafagofini.com *Counsel for Plaintiff*\n\n### SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK\n\nYANPING WANG a/k/a YVETTE WANG,\n\nPlaintiff,\n\nv.\n\nIndex No.: \\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\\_\n\nXIANMIN XIONG a/k/a XI NUO a/k/a SINO,\n\nDefendant.\n\n**VERIFIED COMPLAINT**\n\nPlaintiff Yanping Wang a/k/a Yvette Wang (hereinafter \"Plaintiff\"), for her complaint against defendant Xianmin Xiong a/k/a Xi Nuo a/k/a Sino (hereinafter \"Defendant\"), by undersigned her counsel, states the following:\n\n### **INTRODUCTION**\n\n1. This action is brought to redress Defendant's ongoing campaign of threats, defamation and harassment directed to the Plaintiff, which has now culminated in Defendant approaching the Plaintiff and threatening to kill her. Indeed, after Defendant's recent death threat to the Plaintiff, he continues to stalk Plaintiff directly outside her place of work.\n\n2. Plaintiff accordingly seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages, and an order enjoining Defendant from continuing his malicious and relentless campaign of defamation, harassment, and intimidation, and from further tarnishing Plaintiff's reputation.\n\n### **PARTIES AND JURISDICTION**\n\n3. Plaintiff is a female individual, who was at all times relevant hereto an adult resident of New York County, in the State of New York.\n\n4. Defendant is a male individual, who, upon information and belief, was at all times relevant hereto an adult resident of the State of New York.\n\n5. Jurisdiction is proper as both parties are residents of New York State.\n\n6. Venue is proper as Plaintiff resides in New York County (CPLR 503(a)), and\n\nDefendant committed many of the tortious acts detailed herein in New York County.\n\n### **BACKGROUND**\n\n### **Defendant's Ongoing Defamation and Harassment of the Plaintiff**\n\n### **Background of the Harassment Campaign**\n\n7. Defendant's campaign to terrorize Plaintiff began with his repeated and malicious posting of false and defamatory material on online social media platforms regarding the Plaintiff. As detailed below, these defamatory posts include the blatantly false allegations that: Plaintiff, who is a married woman, is involved in an extra-marital sexual relationship with another man; that Plaintiff has supposedly been raped by a work colleague; that Plaintiff has destroyed evidence relevant to a legal proceeding; and that Plaintiff has engaged in wrongful interrogation and detention of an alleged witness in a legal proceeding. Defendant made all of these false allegations knowing they were false, and with the malicious intent to destroy Plaintiff's reputation and career, and instill terror in her on a daily basis.\n\n8. These defamatory statements are particularly egregious because Plaintiff is not a public figure, and is instead an innocent woman – a wife and mother – who is a private individual working for a private company.\n\n9. Defendant's campaign against Plaintiff is persistent and continuing. For example, on August 26, 2017, Defendant posted on his Twitter account to his approximately 31,500 followers that Plaintiff, referred to as \"Sister Yanping,\" had an intimate relationship with a man named \"Robert.\" Specifically, Defendant tweeted the following defamatory statement: \"Robert has an intimate relationship with Sister Yanping. He doesn't have a decent stance but only cares about the money.\" A full and correct copy of the tweet and a certified translation is attached hereto as Exhibit A.\n\n10. The above defamatory tweet conveys a false statement of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, namely, that Plaintiff – a married woman – is having an extramarital intimate relationship with a man named Robert.\n\n11. Subsequently, on September 5, 2017, Defendant posted another outrageous and defamatory comment regarding Plaintiff, this time purporting to quote a fake interview that Defendant falsely claims that Plaintiff gave about her relationship with her male work colleague, Guo Wengui. Specifically, Defendant tweeted that:\n\n> Wang Yanping denied today that the recording of her having sex with Guo Wengui published on Twitter was true. She even totally denied the recorded conversation between her and Ma Rui was true. She did not comment at all on the alleged rape Guo Wengui involved.\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and a certified translation is attached hereto as Exhibit B.\n\n12. The above statements by Defendant again convey false and defamatory statements of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff. Specifically, Defendant falsely alleges that Plaintiff had sex with a man other than her husband, and that Plaintiff is complicit in the rape of another woman.\n\n13. The next day, on September 6, 2017, Defendant again posted a defamatory tweet about Plaintiff. In this post, Defendant presented a fake dialogue between Plaintiff (referred to as \"Yan\") and another woman (referred to as \"Ma\"). This phony dialogue conveys to the public that the Plaintiff helped intimidate Ma Rui and participated in the intimidation of a witness to a crime. Specifically, Defendant tweeted the following:\n\n> Yan: I love sister Ma very much, she is a very innocent kid. Ma: You helped bad people to victimize the weak and detained me in the apartment. Yan: She is introverted and may suffer depression. Ma: You grabbed my cellphone and forced me not to call the police.\n\nYan: All the so-called conversation recordings between Wang Yanping and Ma Rui on the internet are fake.\n\nMa: You may think that you can deceive some people, and you can deceive them for some period of time, but you will never be able to deceive everyone forever.\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and a certified translation of its text is attached hereto as\n\nExhibit A.\n\n14. The above tweet makes a false and defamatory statement of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff. Specifically, it accuses Plaintiff of illegally detaining and threatening another woman, and conveys to the public that Plaintiff is lying about her involvement in these illegal actions.\n\n15. Less than a month later, on October 12, 2017, Defendant again posted another defamatory tweet regarding the Plaintiff. Specifically, Defendant tweeted:\n\n> Wang Yanping: You have to think clearly. The case of Ma Rui is going to be a criminal case. You definitely will become one of the defendants, because you are suspected of assisting Guo Wengui in destroying the forensic evidence. You should first sue Guo Wengui for sexual assault at this critical moment, after all it is the truth. You have been terribly deceived by Guo Wengui-- you cannot go back home and you have been separated from your child and husband out of your choice. Once you are sued in court, it will be very hard to turn things around. Be smart and sue Guo Wengui immediately to turn the table around and take the situation under your control.\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and a certified translation is attached hereto as Exhibit A.\n\n16. The above defamatory tweet conveys a false statement of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, that is, that Plaintiff has assisted in destroying evidence relevant to a crime, that Plaintiff was sexually assaulted, and that Plaintiff allows herself to be sexually assaulted.\n\n17. The above defamatory statements – which are false and have no basis in fact – were made by Defendant with malice and knowledge of their falsity could only be said with the intent to cause the direct and proximate harm of ruining Plaintiff's reputation, her business relationships, and her relationship with her husband.\n\n### **The Defamatory Statements for Which Plaintiff Asserts Defamation Claims**\n\n18. Defendant's campaign to terrorize the Plaintiff has not only continued, but has but has increased in its ferocity and plain intent to completely destroy Plaintiff's family life and career. As part of this campaign to destroy the Plaintiff's life, the Defendant embarked on the below series of internet postings, all aimed to destroy the Plaintiff's reputation and isolate her from her family.\n\n19. On January 18, 2019, Defendant posted a tweet falsely accusing Plaintiff of plagiarizing the signature of her work colleague Guo. Specifically, Defendant's tweet stated that:\n\n> It has been learned that the counsel Daniel Watt who is retained by Guo Wengui for a lawsuit against Xia Yeliang and Li Hongkuan has already applied for withdrawal. What is surprising is that in **Guo Wengui's confirmation letter that Daniel submitted to the court is actually signed in Yanping's handwriting**. [emphasis added]\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and a certified translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n20. The above defamatory tweet by the Defendant conveys a false and defamatory statement of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff. Specifically, the tweet falsely conveys that Plaintiff has illegally fabricated evidence relevant to a legal proceeding.\n\n21. On April 26, 2019, a YouTube video was uploaded in which the Defendant\n\ndiscussed Ms. Wang's testimony in a trial. Specifically, the Defendant states that:\n\nSo I will tell you guys about the situation of the trial this morning. There were three witnesses being examined in the morning and the first one who testified was Wang Yanping….The counsel then asked her if she knew about the purchase of this building by XXX, the off-shore company. She replied she didn't know. Yet, the counsel held a pile of papers and said, \"You signed all these papers, but you knew nothing about these?\" **She then stammered and said she was super nervous, she had already forgotten these matters and please pardon her. So, it was obvious that she had lied on these matters.** [emphasis added]\n\nA true and correct copy of the relevant excerpts of the transcript of the YouTube video and a certified translation are attached hereto as Exhibit B.\n\n22. Defendant's description of Plaintiff's testimony as quoted above is false and clearly\n\nconveys a defamatory statement of purported fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, specifically,\n\nthat Plaintiff has illegally provided false testimony under oath.\n\n23. Two days later, on April 28, 2019, Defendant posted yet another defamatory tweet\n\nabout the Plaintiff. In this new tweet, Defendant falsely alleges that Plaintiff has knowledge of a\n\nsexual assault which she is not reporting. Specifically, Defendant tweeted that:\n\n**If Wang Yanping wants to save her own ass, the only way is to file a report in the police station, accusing someone for sexual assault**. The evidence is very easy and simple, there are a lot of audio clips online. If she still cares about losing her face in public at this point, she is too stupid. [emphasis added]\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and a certified translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n24. Two weeks later, on May 12, 2019, Defendant again falsely tweeted about\n\nPlaintiff's alleged failure to report a sexual assault, specifically tweeting:\n\nI told Wang Yanping that you have no future if you follow Guo Wengui. Guo never has any loyalty to his friends. He uses people when they have value to him and he throws them away like a piece of cleaning shred if they have lost their value to him. **I hope that she can report to the NYPD accusing Guo Wengui raping and assaulting her.** This action will turn her situation from losing to winning [emphasis added]\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and a certified translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n25. On that same day, May 12, 2019, Defendant also tweeted that:\n\n**There was an occasion where Guo Wengui assaulted Wang Yanping after he got drunk. Not only did he rape Wang, he also stepped on her belly violently**. There was a recording of this audio clip online. It seems that Wa Li was there at that time too. [emphasis added]\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n26. The above-quoted three tweets clearly convey false and defamatory statements of fact to the public regarding the Plaintiff. Specifically, the tweets falsely convey that Plaintiff is a rape victim, and that Plaintiff is having sex with another man, despite being married. The tweets also falsely convey that Plaintiff is obstructing justice by not reporting crimes of which she is supposedly aware.\n\n27. On June 7, 2019, Defendant posted yet another tweet, in which he falsely accused\n\nPlaintiff of \"interrogating\" Ma Rui. Specifically, Defendant tweeted that:\n\n**Since the exposure of the audio clip about Guo Wengui and his secretary Wang Yanping interrogating Ma Rui together**, Ms. Wang accepted the interview from Der Spiegel, leaving recorded proof of her voice. **After verification from the Australian judicial authorities, the audio clip of Wang Yanping having an interview with Der Spiegel is the same as the audio clip of her interrogating Ma Rui**. This evidence has already been submitted to the court. [emphasis added]\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n28. The above tweet clearly conveys a false and defamatory statement of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, that is, that Plaintiff has been involved in the improper interrogation of a witness to a legal proceeding.\n\n29. On July 11, 2019, Defendant posted another tweet falsely stating that Plaintiff (referred to as \"Wangyanping\") and Guo Wengui interrogated Ma Rui and coerced her into destroying evidence. Specifically, Defendant alleges the following:\n\n> I have listened to the recording of Guo Wengui and Wangyanping's interrogation on Ma Rui 5 times. **There are 9 occasions where Ma Rui was coerced to hand over the evidences of being raped**, for example, the underwear contaminated by bodily fluid, the blood-stained bed sheet, the name of the pharmacy for getting birth-control pills, the number of times of being raped, the locations of the offenses and whether or not the boat staff and security guards were present etc. [emphasis added]\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n30. The above tweet clearly makes false and defamatory statements of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, that is, that Plaintiff improperly interrogated and illegally coerced a witness to a legal proceeding into destroying evidence.\n\n31. On July 13, 2019, Defendant again posted a defamatory tweet about the Plaintiff, falsely asserting that there is an alleged tape recording of Plaintiff and Guo Wengui interrogating Ma Rui. Specifically, Defendant tweeted that: \"There are 3 main pieces of evidence that support the charge against Guo Wengui as a rapist: 3. **The one-hour-forty-minute audio clip of Guo Wengui and Wang Yanping interrogating Ma Rui**[.]\" [emphasis added] A full and correct copy of the tweet and translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n32. The above defamatory tweet conveys false and defamatory statements of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, specifically that Plaintiff participated in a nearly two-hour improper interrogation of Ma Rui, a witness to a legal proceeding.\n\n33. On July 13, 2019, Defendant posted a tweet containing a link to a YouTube video. Defendant describes the video as: \"**Pangu Boss Guo Wengui having sex with female secretary Wang Yanping in office[**.]\" [emphasis added]. A full and correct copy of the tweet and translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n34. The above defamatory tweet conveys a false and defamatory statement of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, specifically that Plaintiff, a married woman, has had sex at the office with a male colleague.\n\n35. Later that day, Defendant posted another defamatory tweet referencing the same video. Specifically, Defendant tweeted, in relevant part:\n\n## **New evidences that support Guo Wengui as a suspect of rape are:** \\*\\*\\*\n\n### 4. **The audio clip of Guo Wengui raping and assaulting Wang Yanping**\n\n[emphasis added]\n\nA full and correct copy of the tweet and translation is attached hereto as Exhibit C.\n\n36. The above defamatory tweets convey a false statement of fact to the public regarding Plaintiff, specifically that Plaintiff has been raped and assaulted, and that Plaintiff, a married woman, has had sex with another man.\n\n### **Defendant's Harassment Campaign Culminates with Defendant Making an In-Person Death Threat Against Plaintiff**\n\n37. Defendant's campaign to terrorize the Plaintiff, and completely destroy her family life and business reputation, has now shockingly progressed to the point where Defendant has made an in-person death threat against the Plaintiff.\n\n38. Specifically, on April 26, 2019, Defendant approached the Plaintiff outside of courtroom 232 in the New York County Supreme Court, located at 60 Centre Street, and ominously sat next to her, despite her request that he leave her alone. The Defendant's approaching the Plaintiff after terrorizing her for many months in defamatory postings obviously placed her in fear of bodily harm, and she repeatedly asked Defendant to leave her alone, which he refused.\n\n39. Ignoring the Plaintiff's pleas to be left alone, the Defendant then did the unthinkable: he issued her a death threat, while jutting and raising his fists and arms threateningly toward her face and body. Specifically, Defendant stated to the Plaintiff, while raising his fists toward her:\n\n### **\"You will be killed in a car accident.\"**\n\n### **\"You will never see your child or your husband again.\"**\n\n### **\"You are throwing your life away.\"**\n\n40. The Defendant's death threats issued to Plaintiff as he sat next to her placed Plaintiff in fear of her life. Plaintiff again pleaded for the Defendant to leave her alone. Yet, faced with the Plaintiff terrorized and in tears, Defendant persisted in his course of terror against Plaintiff, an innocent woman. The Defendant hurled his head and arms toward the Plaintiff and continued with his verbal abuse and assault.\n\n41. To further make clear to Plaintiff that her life was in danger, the Defendant referenced the untimely death of a Chinese dissident residing in France of similar approximate age as Plaintiff. Plaintiff lived in France for a number of years.\n\n42. Defendant made his death threat to the Plaintiff intentionally, with malice, and with the actual intent to cause the Plaintiff to fear serious bodily harm or death. Defendant's statements were objectively meant to invoke fear in Plaintiff and convey that the Plaintiff and her family would suffer serious bodily injury and death.\n\n### **Defendant Escalates His Death Threat by Appearing at Plaintiff's Doorstep, And Engaging in Violence to Terrorize Her**\n\n43. The Defendant's terrorizing behavior did not stop with the death threat issued in the courthouse. Following the April 26, 2019 threat on her life, the Defendant has now escalated the death threat by coming directly to her doorstep and engaging in acts of violence, all making clear that Defendant is prepared to carry out the threat on her life. As discussed below, Defendant has repeatedly come to Plaintiff's place of work, despite the fact that he does not live or work on that block, and has acted violently even when security was called.\n\n44. There is no reasonable basis for Defendant to be near Plaintiff's place of work as Defendant does not work or live on the block where Plaintiff's office is located. The only reason for this behavior is to instill imminent fear of bodily harm in Plaintiff.\n\n45. First, on July 25, 2019, having recently made the in-person death threat against the Plaintiff, Defendant suddenly appeared directly outside the building where Plaintiff works (162 E. 64th Street, New York County, New York). Defendant menacingly lurked outside the building for at least thirty minutes.\n\n46. The following day, on Friday, July 26, 2019, the Defendant *again* menacingly appeared outside of Plaintiff's place of work (162 E. 64th Street), and remained there for at least thirty minutes. Subsequently, on Saturday, July 27, 2019, Defendant again appeared outside Plaintiff's place of work (162 E. 64th Street), and remained ominously outside the front door of the building for at least thirty minutes.\n\n47. Thereafter, on Monday July 29, 2019, Defendant again menacing appeared directly outside the building where Plaintiff works. Because the Defendant had appeared outside of Plaintiff's work so many times, this time Plaintiff had a member of a security team go out to ask Defendant what his purpose was. Shockingly, rather than leaving, the Defendant confronted a member of the security team, lunging his body and arms toward the security team member in a violent manner.\n\n48. Defendant's defiance and acts of violence toward a security officer has only heightened the very real fear of serious bodily injury and death that the Plaintiff has as a result of the Defendant's ongoing acts of harassment, intimidation, violence and death threats.\n\n49. Indeed, despite his interaction with the security guard the previous day, the Defendant again menacingly appeared the very next day (July 30, 2019) directly outside of the building where Plaintiff works and attempted to **gain access to the building**. This was clearly in an attempt to harm and harass Plaintiff and further showing that the Defendant has malicious intent and that he is completely undeterred by any security team.\n\n50. Plaintiff, fearing for her safety and well-being, filed a police report with the NYPD, and it is Plaintiff's understanding that an investigation into the Defendant's criminal conduct ensued and is ongoing.\n\n### **Defendant's Campaign of Ongoing Harassment Has Also Caused Serious Emotional and Ecomonic Damages, and Destruction of Her Marriage**\n\n51. Defendant's malicious defamation campaign has caused Plaintiff serious damage to her reputation. Defendant's malicious defamation campaign has also caused the destruction of Plaintiff's marriage and prevented her from seeing her young son, as it has included, among other things, the false allegation of an ongoing extra-marital sexual relationship. As a result of the destruction of her reputation and marriage, Plaintiff has suffered extreme emotional distress.\n\n52. Defendant's malicious defamation campaign has also caused Plaintiff substantial damages to her business contracts and relationships. Plaintiff is a consultant in the financial industry, specializing in providing advice as to the local customs, regulations, and policies that exist in mainland China. Her reputation as an honest and trustworthy business woman is essential to her trade. Thus, Defendant's defamatory statements that Plaintiff is engaged in extramarital affairs, the destruction of evidence, and the interrogation and intimidation of witnesses to criminal conduct clearly injure her in her line of business.\n\n53. For example, because of Plaintiff's deep experience with and knowledge of Chinese business practices, Plaintiff had a lucrative consulting contract with ACA Investment Management Limited (\"ACA\"), under which Plaintiff advised a Hong Kong business on local customs, regulations, and policies that exist in mainland China.\n\n54. Under the contract with ACA, Plaintiff was to receive \\$1.5 million a year.\n\n55. Defendant was aware of Plaintiff's contract with ACA, and her prospective business relationship with ACA. Defendant maliciously intended to destroy Plaintiff's business relationships, including with ACA, by publicly defaming her as set forth in detail above.\n\n56. Defendant succeeded in destroying Plaintiff's business relationship with ACA. After Defendant began his internet campaign to destroy Plaintiff's reputation, ACA contacted Plaintiff in or about August 2017 and informed her that the Defendant's allegations regarding Plaintiff were not consistent with the image it needed to portray to its client base and business counterparts, and that as a result of the negative publicity, ACA would terminate their relationship with the Plaintiff.\n\n57. Thus, Defendant's malicious defamation of the Plaintiff not only terrorized her, destroyed her reputation and destroyed her relationship with her husband and family, but has also directly and proximately interfered with her contract and prospective business relationship with ACA.\n\n58. Indeed, as a result of the termination of her contract with ACA, Plaintiff lost millions of dollars in damages from the loss of this business relationship alone.\n\n### **FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF** (Assault)\n\n59. The above paragraphs are repeated and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.\n\n60. Defendant's physical confrontation of the Plaintiff on April 26, 2019, including his raising of his fists toward the Plaintiff and issuing her a death threat (as set forth above in detail), was intended to place Plaintiff in apprehension of serious harmful or offensive contact and in great fear of imminent serious bodily injury and death.\n\nserious bodily injury and death, and has suffered severe emotional distress.\n\n62. As a result of the Defendant's assault, Plaintiff has suffered, and will continue to suffer, damages to be proven at trial.\n\n63. In addition to monetary damages, Plaintiff is also entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, including enjoining the Defendant from coming near the Plaintiff or her place of residence or business, or issuing any further threats to Plaintiff or her family.\n\n64. Plaintiff is entitled to an award of compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial. In addition, Defendant's actions were deliberate, willful, intentional, wanton, malicious, and oppressive and in conscious disregard for the rights of Plaintiff, and should be punished with an award of punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.\n\n### **SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF** (Defamation)\n\n65. The above paragraphs are repeated and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.\n\n66. The defamatory statements that are set out with particularly in paragraphs 18 to 36 above and that Defendant published on his social media profiles about Plaintiff have no basis in fact, are false and defamatory, and are not the subject of any privilege.\n\n67. Defendant had actual knowledge that the information he published was false, and he acted with malice, including the intent to harass the Plaintiff and destroy her reputation and business. In the alternative, in knowingly publishing highly derogatory information about a private figure (the Plaintiff), Defendant in the least acted in a grossly irresponsible manner and without due consideration for the standards of information gathering.\n\n68. Defendant's published false comments regarding the Plaintiff were made with the intent to harm Plaintiff and with actual malice.\n\n69. Defendant's defamation has directly and proximately caused Plaintiff's special damages, including but not limited to damage to her reputation, her business relationships, her relationship with her husband and child, and severe emotional distress.\n\n70. In addition to monetary damages, Plaintiff is also entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, including enjoining the Defendant's defamation and interference with business relations. Because Defendant has placed Plaintiff's personal character and reputation publicly at issue, Plaintiff is entitled to a declaratory judgment that Defendant's statements are false.\n\n71. Plaintiff is entitled to an award of compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.\n\n### **THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF** (Defamation Per Se)\n\n72. The above paragraphs are repeated and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.\n\n73. The defamatory statements that are discussed in paragraphs 18 to 36 and that Defendant published on his social media profiles about Plaintiff are false and defamatory, and not the subject of any privilege.\n\n74. Defendant had actual knowledge that the information he published was false, and he acted with malice, including the intent to harass the Plaintiff and destroy her reputation. In the alternative, in knowingly publishing highly derogatory information about a private figure (the Plaintiff), Defendant in the least acted in a grossly irresponsible manner and without due consideration for the standards of information gathering.\n\n75. Defendant's false statements concerning the Plaintiff include accusations that Plaintiff has committed serious crimes, and are of the type that tend to injure Plaintiff in her trade, business, and profession and impute salacious and immoral conduct to Plaintiff. Defendant's false statements about Plaintiff made to public include the following: that Plaintiff, who is a married woman, is involved in an extra-marital sexual relationship with another man; that Plaintiff has supposedly been raped by a work colleague; that Plaintiff has destroyed evidence relevant to a legal proceeding; and that Plaintiff has engaged in wrongful interrogation and detention of an alleged witness in a legal proceeding.\n\n76. The published false comments were made with the intent to harm Plaintiff and with actual malice.\n\n77. Defendant's defamation has directly and proximately caused Plaintiff's damage, including but not limited to damage to her reputation, her business relationships, her relationship with her husband and child, and severe emotional distress.\n\n78. The injurious character of Defendant's false statements is a self-evident fact of common knowledge which not be pleaded or proved.\n\n79. As such, Defendant's false statements are actionable without proof of special damages.\n\n80. In addition to monetary damages, Plaintiff is also entitled to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, including enjoining the Defendant's defamation and interference with business relations.\n\n81. Because Defendant has placed Plaintiff's personal character and reputation publicly at issue Plaintiff is entitled to a declaratory judgment that Defendant's statements are false.\n\n## **FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF**\n\n(Tortious Interference with Contract)\n\n82. The above paragraphs are repeated and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.\n\n83. Plaintiff had a valid contract with ACA for consulting services.\n\n84. Defendant was aware of Plaintiff's contract with ACA.\n\n85. Defendant intentionally interfered with Plaintiff's contract with ACA by intentionally inducing ACA to breach the contract.\n\n86. Defendant acted solely out of malice or wrongful means.\n\n87. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants malicious and wrongful actions,\n\nACA breached its contract with Plaintiff. But for Defendant's wrongful conduct, ACA would not have breached its contract with Plaintiff.\n\n88. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant's malicious and wrongful actions, Plaintiff has suffered damages. To compensate for these damages, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.\n\n## **FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF**\n\n(Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations)\n\n89. The above paragraphs are repeated and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.\n\n90. Plaintiff had a business relationship with ACA.\n\n91. Defendant knew of Plaintiff's business relationship with ACA and intentionally interfered with it.\n\n92. Defendant acted solely out of malice or wrongful means.\n\n93. Defendant's interference directly and proximately caused injury to Plaintiff's relationship with ACA, as evidenced by ACA terminating its business relationship with Plaintiff. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's malicious and wrongful actions, ACA ended its ongoing business dealings with the Plaintiff. But for Defendant's wrongful conduct, ACA would have continued its business relationship with the Plaintiff.\n\n94. As a direct and proximate result of the Defendant's misconduct, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial.\n\n### **PRAYER FOR RELIEF**\n\n**WHEREFORE**, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendant as follows:\n\n- (a) An award of compensatory and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial;\n- (b) Preliminary and permanent injunctive relief enjoining Defendant and his respective agents, servants, employees, officers, and assigns, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with him, from further publication of any false, malicious, defamatory or materially misleading comments regarding Plaintiff, or issuing any death threats to Plaintiff;\n- (c) Preliminary and permanent injunctive relief enjoining Defendant and his respective agents, servants, employees, officers, and assigns, and all other persons acting in active concert or participation with him, from coming near the Plaintiff or her place of residence or business;\n- (d) a declaratory judgment that Defendant's comments regarding Plaintiff are false;\n- (e) an award of attorneys' fees, costs, and expenses; and\n- (f) such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 1\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\nDated: New York, New York August 8, 2019\n\n### **CATAFAGO FINI LLP**\n\n/s/ Tom M. Fini Tom M. Fini, Esq. Jacques Catafago, Esq. The Empire State Building 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7710 New York, NY 10118 212-239-9669 tom@catafagofini.com *Counsel for Plaintiff*\n\n![](_page_21_Picture_0.jpeg)\n\n### VERIFICATION\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss: COUNTY OF NEW YORK )\n\nI, Yanping Wang, am the Plaintiff in the above entitled action. I have read the foregoing Complaint and know the contents thereof. The contents are true to my own knowledge except as to matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and that as to those matters, I believe them to be true.\n\nYANPING WANG\n\nSubscribed and Sworn to before me on this EA date of August 2019\n\nUllioistbello J.\nNOTARY PUBLIC\n\nKARIN MAISTRELLO NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF NEW YORK Registradon No. orMA6376654 Qgdined in NY County Commision expiresJune, 182012\n\n## EXHIBIT A\n\nAFFIDAVIT\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK )\n\n) ss\n\nCOUNTY OF QUEENS )\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss: COUNTY OF QUEENS )\n\nI, Shenyi Glass, am <sup>a</sup> linguist hired by TransPerfect, <sup>a</sup> translation services that operates under both ISO 9001:2008 and EN 15038:2006 certification. <sup>I</sup> have been speaking Mandarin dialect of Chinese for <sup>50</sup>\n\nyears. <sup>I</sup> am <sup>a</sup> recipient of Certifications for New York State Court Interpreter and National Healthcare\n\nThe following document is, to the best of my knowledge and belief <sup>a</sup> true and accurate translation from Chinese into English:\n\nInterpreter. I have studied Mandarin translation for 5 years.\n\nThe Attached Social Media Posts TransPerfect Translations, Inc., <sup>a</sup> translation organization with over 90 offices on six continents, is <sup>a</sup>\n\ntranslating into the above language pair, its work being accepted by business organizations, governmental\n\nTuesday, August 07, 2019\n\nShengi Rivers\n\nhenyi Glass,\n\nMandarin Interpreter & Translator\n\nTransPerfect Translations, Inc. affirms that the provided translation was produced in according to our ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17100:2015 certified quality management system, and also that the agents responsible\n\nleader in professional translations. TransPerfect Translations, Inc. has over twenty years experience\n\nfor said translation(s) are qualified to translate and review documents for the above language pair, and are not <sup>a</sup> relation to any of the parties named in the source document(s).\n\nSworn to before me this Wednesday, August 07, 2019\n\nSignature, Notary Public\n\nStamp, Notary Public\n\nStamp, Notary Public\n\nNOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01 SH6352366 Qualified in Omos County My Commission Exµiies 12-2 1-26z6\n\n![](_page_24_Picture_0.jpeg)\n\nO\n\nyoutube.com\n\n1844 - 21jul. 2017\n\n17 Retweets E Likes\n\nquotanen from the compâñy\n\nhacked.\n\n\"T&M\"\n\nGuo Wengui directed Wang Yanping to steal the contents of cmails from the mailboxes. The\n\nwas from \\$US75,000 to \\$US100,000 for per mailbox that is\n\nhttp\n\n|  | <p><b>西诺</b></p> <p>@sinofreedom</p> | <span>Follow</span> |\n|--|--------------------------------------|---------------------|\n|--|--------------------------------------|---------------------|\n\n王雁平：你要想明白了，马蕊一案将要刑诉，\n\n你必然要成为被告之一，因为你有协助郭文贵\n\n毁灭犯罪证据的嫌疑，在这个关键时刻你必须\n\n抢先控告郭文贵性侵，这本来就是事实，你已\n\n经被郭文贵骗的很惨，有家不能回，有孩子老\n\n公活活拆散。你被告上法庭就很难翻身了，\n\n聪明一点立刻把郭告了，变被动为主动。\n\nTranslate Tweet\n\n7:55 PM - 12 Oct 2017\n\n**199** Retweets **66** Likes\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/2019 06:22 PM** INDEX NO. 157786/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\nFollow\n\nTranslate Tweet 7:55 PM - <sup>12</sup> Oct 2017\n\nWangianping: You have to t1 <sup>k</sup> clearly. The case of Ma Rui is going to be <sup>a</sup> criminal case.\n\nYou definitely will become one of the defend5mts, because you are suspected of assisting Guo Wengui in destroying the forensic evidence. You should first sue Guo Wengui for sexual assault at this critical moment, after all it is the truth. You have been terribly deceived by Guo Wengui- you cannot go back home and you have been separated from your child and husband out of your\n\nchoice. Once you are sued in court, it will be very hard to turn things around. Be smart and sue\n\nGuo Wengui immediately to turn the table around and take the situation under your control.\n\n199 Retweets 66 Likes\n\n![](_page_26_Picture_0.jpeg)\n\n@ Translate Tweet\n\nRobert has an intimate relationship with Sister Yanping (Wang Yanping). He doesn't have <sup>a</sup>\n\no\n\n5:34 AM - <sup>26</sup> Aug <sup>2017</sup>\n\ndecent stance but only cares about the money.\n\n![](_page_27_Picture_0.jpeg)\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/2019 06:22 PM** INDEX NO. 157786/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\nMP , -B : MhttM , tBREME Nit 9. 5 : tatBP9F61 , M884tM5 . -B : B fBR taten , 52ieR¥t8 . 5 : M1ftF\\$9\n\nFollow\n\n![](_page_27_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\nTranslate Tweet\n\n9:18 AM - 6 Sep 2017\n\n9:18 AM -\n\ninternet are fake.\n\nYan: I love sister Ma very much, she is a very innocent kid.\n\nMa: You helped bad people to victimize the weak and detained me in the apartment.\n\nYan: She is introverted and may suffer depression.\n\nYanping's war against Ma (Rui).\n\nMa: You grabbed my cellphone and forced me not to call the police.\n\n<sup>6</sup> Sep 2017\n\nYan: All the so-called conversation recordings between Wang Yanping and Ma Rui on the internet are fake.\n\n@remonwangxt\n\nMa: You helped bad people to victimize the weak and detained me in the apartment.\n\nYan: All the so-called conversation recordings between Wang Yañping and Ma Rui on the\n\nMa: You may think that you can deceive some people, and you can deceive them for some\n\n@ Translate Tweet\n\nMa: You grabbed my cellphone and forced me not to call the police.\n\nperiod of time, but you will never be able to deceive everyone forever.\n\nYan: <sup>I</sup> love sister Ma very much, she is <sup>a</sup> very innocent kid.\n\n## EXHIBIT B\n\nAFFIDAVIT\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK )\n) ss\nCOUNTY OF QUEENS )\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss: COUNTY OF QUEENS )\n\nI, Shenyi Glass, am <sup>a</sup> linguist hired by TransPerfect, <sup>a</sup> translation services that operates under both ISO 9001:2008 and EN 15038:2006 certification. <sup>I</sup> have been speaking Mandarin dialect of Chinese for <sup>50</sup>\n\nyears. <sup>I</sup> am <sup>a</sup> recipient of Certifications for New York State Court Interpreter and National Healthcare\n\nThe following document is, to the best of my knowledge and belief <sup>a</sup> true and accurate translation from Chinese into English:\n\nInterpreter. I have studied Mandarin translation for 5 years.\n\nThe Attached Social Media Posts TransPerfect Translations, Inc., <sup>a</sup> translation organization with over 90 offices on six continents, is <sup>a</sup>\n\ntranslating into the above language pair, its work being accepted by business organizations, governmental\n\nauthorities and courts throughout the United States and internationally.\n\nhenyi Glass,\n\nMandarin Interpreter & Translator\n\nTransPerfect Translations, Inc. affirms that the provided translation was produced in according to our ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17100:2015 certified quality management system, and also that the agents responsible\n\nleader in professional translations. TransPerfect Translations, Inc. has over twenty years experience\n\nfor said translation(s) are qualified to translate and review documents for the above language pair, and are not <sup>a</sup> relation to any of the parties named in the source document(s).\n\nSworn to before me this Wednesday, August 07, 2019\n\nSignature, Notary Public\n\nStamp, Notary Public\n\nStamp, Notary Public\n\nNOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01 SH6352366 Qualified in Omos County My Commission Exµiies 12-2 1-26z6\n\n### 1. A conversation between Xi Nuo and Xia Yeliang\n\nXi Nuo: Yu Yong told me in person stating the most miserable person is Guo Mei.\n\n夏业良：郭美住院的时候于泳陪着她呢是吧。另外还有他的儿子郭强好像也被他搞的……\n\nXia Yeliang: While Guo Mei (Miles Kwok's daughter) was admitted in the hospital, she was accompanied By Yu Yong, wasn't she? Also, it seems like his son Mileson Kwok was also messed up by him...\n\n西诺: 郭强的, 就变成成灰了呀。郭强的女朋友是一个很漂亮的模特, 郭文贵趁着郭强出差的时候对她进行性侵了。\n\nXi Nuo: Mileson Kwok has become such a pitiable weak man. Mileson Kwok's girlfriend is a very beautiful model. Guo Wengui sexually assaulted her when Mileson Kwok went on a business trip.\n\nXia Yeliang: People said he committed incest...\n\nXi Nuo: The one who was involved in the incest is Wang Yanping.\n\nXia Yeliang: Wang Yanping is his (Guo Wengui's) nephew's wife.\n\n西诺: 侄媳妇。所以就是这么说的。这个人下三滥,兔子也不吃窝边草啊。\n\nXi Nuo: Nephew's wife. That's why he was called a rotten piece of shit. Even the rabbit won't taste the grass in or around its cage.\n\n夏业良：而且他经常骂郭强，他录音里……\n\nXia Yeliang: Also, he often scolded Mileson Kwok, in the recordings, he...\n\n西诺：骂他是无能。郭强也是厌恶这个爹。为什么呢？你想想，哪个做爹的能把女儿儿子推到犯罪的第一线。你看看香港的那个案子里面，头一个起诉的不是郭文贵，是他女儿，还有他儿子。\n\nXi Nuo: Scolded him for incompetence. Mileson Kwok also despised this dad. Why? Just think, what kind of dad could push his own daughter and son to the frontline of the crimes? Check out the cases in Hong Kong--the first person to be sued is never Guo Wengui, but always his daughter and his son.\n\nXia Yeliang: That's how his children got ruined. Even the fierce tiger won't bite on its own cubs (Chinese idiom: everyone loves their own children).\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/2019 06:22 PM** INDEX NO. 157786/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\n1513: RiflEAWBP, 5ARTR)JitRIE 805tW, TM19th\\$950 R)é R2MBff3WRMitaRBOAEARM\\$1%\n\nXi Nuo: We all have children. We encourage them to do proper things, but not illegal things. And I think people in An Hui-the hometown of Hushi (Province in Eastern China) all value the education very much.\n\nR1R: \\$E9744244&A? ftBOAM, EW atWEf)Rit, tett Xia Yeliang: How many members in Guo's family have been ruined by him? His eighth brother, when police made the arrest at that time...\n\n1513: \\$E1% EtPTitftA\\$tW, f&t1\\$f15†W800WP, 442% , RWMt1\\$ftWP, ERTR\\$27JR\\$0\n\nXi Nuo: What Guo Wengui did at that time is that he grabbed the police officer's neck. When his younger brother saw that his big brother could grab the officer's neck, he brandished a kitchen knife and hacked!\n\nXia Yeliang: So he was killed by the police with a single shot.\n\n### 2. http (2:37-3:35) Rfff\\$2|jÈ GBSMedia\n\nWM14FE\\$895%\n\n+R41 AMEftiEAMWWit0\n\n18800R4157, 1574R3FT ARR, tT†ktkWMM00 it0tf 5, BAftRit, 5%i91f\\$0\n\n<sup>A</sup> <sup>2009</sup> fF#eRRA Guo Family \\$40 thiÄRGsR4XtEAftf f]E n\\$91004A0\n\nB#ttRRIf\\$4WehEtErnM\\$M\\$4, 24M\\$4, 24tft Aft 8tRMTT4 it002ERAR\\*45ttiMRtRWML\n\nf\\$95Xf t, XXX AFMrj@±int@\\$9mK\\$\\$pTAntW, itRRTAE it EAf\\$95X\\*W \\$149%, \\$457R\\*4tf4, %\\$itT\\$pit¤4?\n\n1821199, itRR Super nervous, RARET, RB842t\\$7R\\*15 tL 19951% ER \\$2, tt&R\\*45842710\n\n### Xi Nuo:\n\nSo I will tell you guys about the situation of the trial this morning. There were three witnesses being examined in the morning and the first one who testified was Wang Yamping. She wore plain clothes today and looked like she was in pretty good spirits. She was asked by the counsel whom she was representing and whom she worked for. She said she started working for the Guo family in 2009, and she worked for around 100 people in the family. Also, she said her main duty is to conduct research, prepare materials and documeñts for this family. She did not have the final say on other matters. What she meant was that she has nothing to do with these matters. The counsel then asked her if she knew about the purchase of this building by XXX, the off-shore compañy. She replied she didn't know. Yet, the counsel held a pile of papers and said, \"You signed all these papers, but you knew nothing about these?\" She then stammered and said she was super nervous, she had already forgotten these matters and please pardon her. So, it was obvious that she had lied on these matters.\n\n## 3. Tweet: (2017/9/5)\n\nhtto\n\n![](_page_32_Picture_5.jpeg)\n\n-F'F8:46 - 201749M 5 El\n\n### Xi Nuo:\n\nWang Yanping showed up today and her voice is similar to that of hers in past recordings. It should be confirmed that it is the real Wang Yanping. Wang Yanping denied today that the recording of her haviñg sex with Guo Wengui published on Twitter was true. She even totally denied the reecided conversation between her and Ma Rui was true. She did not ec-¬^ª at all on the alleged rape Guo Wengui involved. She emphasized that she had been a CCP member for 18 years. She had expressed support for Guo's disclosing effort. The date of the interview is üñclear, Der Spiegel did not explain why it was not held in Guo's residence.\n\n## EXHIBIT C\n\n33 of 50\n\nAFFIDAVIT\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK )\nCOUNTY OF QUEENS ) ss\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss: COUNTY OF QUEENS )\n\nI, Shenyi Glass, am <sup>a</sup> linguist hired by TransPerfect, <sup>a</sup> translation services that operates under both ISO 9001:2008 and EN 15038:2006 certification. <sup>I</sup> have been speaking Mandarin dialect of Chinese for <sup>50</sup>\n\nyears. <sup>I</sup> am <sup>a</sup> recipient of Certifications for New York State Court Interpreter and National Healthcare\n\nThe following document is, to the best of my knowledge and belief <sup>a</sup> true and accurate translation from Chinese into English:\n\nInterpreter. I have studied Mandarin translation for 5 years.\n\nThe Attached Social Media Posts TransPerfect Translations, Inc., <sup>a</sup> translation organization with over 90 offices on six continents, is <sup>a</sup>\n\ntranslating into the above language pair, its work being accepted by business organizations, governmental\n\nauthorities and courts throughout the United States and internationally.\n\nhenyi Glass,\n\nMandarin Interpreter & Translator\n\nTransPerfect Translations, Inc. affirms that the provided translation was produced in according to our ISO 9001:2015 and ISO 17100:2015 certified quality management system, and also that the agents responsible\n\nleader in professional translations. TransPerfect Translations, Inc. has over twenty years experience\n\nfor said translation(s) are qualified to translate and review documents for the above language pair, and are not <sup>a</sup> relation to any of the parties named in the source document(s).\n\nSworn to before me this Wednesday, August 07, 2019\n\nSignature, Notary Public\n\nStamp, Notary Public\n\nStamp, Notary Public\n\nNOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No. 01 SH6352366 Qualified in Omos County My Commission Exµiies 12-2 1-26z6\n\n**西诺 @sinofreedom · Jul 20**\n\n王燕平和韩春光只有举报郭文贵才能自保。\n\n**朱万利 @wanli198964 · Jul 20**\n\n唐汉发推：据SV719反诉状，2018/1/6 当着Wallop夫人的面，王雁平笑着签署了本合同。Wallop夫人不认识汉字，王雁平也没有透露，她签的中文并不是她的名字，而是“韩春光”。这份合同落款是韩春光，这次签名与韩在其他证件上签名不一致，但是仔细观察还是能分辨出来。王雁平签字造假，谁给她的胆量？\n\n8701 W. Sahara\n\nLas Vegas, N Google 文档打开\n\nBranch telephone: +1-702-228-2591\n\nSubsequent payments will be made to the same account, unless mutually agreed otherwise in writing. It is understood that the Client may direct other entities to pay the Contractor, and that such payments will be deemed satisfactory compensation by the Contractor. All Client payments must be received by the Contractor by wire transfer within 5 business days of invoice.\n\nBoth parties anticipate that this contract could expand to many more subjects of research. The Client has expressly stated that there could be as many as 4000 such 'fish in the tank'. Obviously, negotiations for the far larger range will be agreed upon in writing at a later date.\n\n**Duration.** This contract shall be in force for three (3) years from the date of signing. Either party may terminate the contract with 30 days' written notice.\n\n| <i>French C. Wallop Signature</i> | <i>Chinese Signature</i> |\n|-----------------------------------|--------------------------|\n| French C. Wallop, CEO             |                          |\n| Strategic-Vision US, LLC          |                          |\n| Date: <i>Jan 6, 2018</i>          | Date: <i>Jan 6, 2018</i> |\n\nDuration. This contract shall be in force lor three 13) years tom the date of signing. Either party rnay terminate the cortract wth written notice.\n\nhttp\n\nsignature. Who gave her this gut?\n\n**Only when Wang Yanping and Han Chunguang report on Guo Wengui can they save themselves.**\n\nFrench C. War p. CEO stree•ørxsen us. u.c\n\nQ <sup>12</sup> <sup>2</sup> O <sup>12</sup>\n\nTang Han tweeted: According to SV719 counterclaim, Wang Yanping signed the contract in this\n\ncase with <sup>a</sup> smile on her face on 01/06/2018 right in front of Mrs. Wallop. Mrs. Wallop doesn't read Chinese characters. Wang Yâñpiñg didn't mention that the Chinese name she signed isn't\n\nChungua.ng\", of course this sig-±re is different from what Han has signed on other documents.\n\nOne can tell the difference if he observes it carefully in details. Wang Yañping fabricated the\n\nher name, but Chinese character \"Han Cheg-f rg\". The signature on this contract is \"Han\n\nYanping\"\n\nthat she was raped by Guo\n\nin a\n\n![](_page_36_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\nFyoutube.com\n\n. .\n\n1-1 <sup>7</sup> Q <sup>8</sup> 1\n\n![](_page_36_Figure_5.jpeg)\n\n**New evidences that support Guo Wengui as a suspect of rape are:**\n\nShow this thread\n\nhttp\n\norganization)\n\nWengui\n\n1. The red wanted fugitive warrant issued by the Interpol (Proof of a written reply from the organization)\n\n<sup>2</sup> Wine AMIMWWWWE En\n\n- <sup>5</sup> WAR9@-em M\n-\n\nNew evidences that suppait Guo Wengui as a suspect of rape are:\n\n2. The video clip of Guo Wengui's female employee cl <sup>g</sup>\n\n3. The advertisement about Guo Wengui sciling his personal spcrms\n\n1. The red wanted fugitive warrant issued by the Interpol (Proof of <sup>a</sup> written reply from the\n\nQ <sup>40</sup> <sup>12</sup> <sup>19</sup> <sup>77</sup>\n\n- 4. The audio clip of Guo Wengui raping and accaniting Wang Yanping\n- 5. The video clip of Guo Wengui sexually assaulting <sup>a</sup> man\n- 6. The video clip of Guo Wengui taking drugs with two women\n- 7. The news report about Guo Wengui sexually assaulting his daughter-in-law\n\n![](_page_37_Picture_6.jpeg)\n\nHis @sinofreedom Jul <sup>13</sup> v 4,51n\\$ #EttTI\\$fi|E\n\n $\\lor$\nyoutu.be/dGppXFIktxc?II... PublIshed b PublIshed an Sep 9 2017\n\n![](_page_37_Picture_10.jpeg)\n\n. youtube.com\n\n![](_page_37_Picture_12.jpeg)\n\nShow this thread\n\nhttp\n\n4. Guo Wengui sexually ases±cd and beat Wang Yanping\n\nPublished by: Chinese Channel\n\nPangu Boss Guo Wengui having sex with fcmaic secretary Wang Yanping in office (Season 8)\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · Jul 13\n\n指控郭文贵为强奸犯的主要证据有三个:\n\n| 1, | 美联社等16家西方媒体对郭文贵强奸女秘书的报道    |\n|----|----------------------------|\n| 2, | 马蕊在纽约法院状告郭文贵强奸的起诉书         |\n| 3, | 长达1小时40分钟的郭文贵和王燕萍审问马蕊的音频资料 |\n\n加上新增加的7个证据, 总共10个证据。\n\n你觉得还不够吗?\n\n胖子 @d55IXPrNhhh1LWg · Jul 13\n\nReplying to @sinofreedom\n\n没说您杜撰, 郭骗什么尿性有点智商的都能看出来。就凭上面那几个事实而非的证据想拿下郭骗希望不大。郭骗已经臭大街了, 他还在乎再多一点脏水?\n\nLRWattR W@1tisRBWAWA 5 Itsia. R\\$¬\\*±RUTLtWA\n\n- E\\$ <sup>i</sup> N\\*TWS4WTW. W Ef ARM7, SEGTM4-A\n- E\\*?\n- Q <sup>11</sup> t-1 <sup>6</sup> Q <sup>18</sup> &\n\n1. <sup>16</sup> westem media compañics ir.ckding Associated Press reporting about Guo Wengui\n\naudio clip of Guo Wengui and Wang Yanping interrogating\n\n2. The legal complaint filed by Ma Rui in the New York Court, accusing Guo Wengui\n\nAlong with the <sup>7</sup> pieces of newly added evidace, there are <sup>a</sup> total of <sup>10</sup> pieces of evidence.\n\nhttp There are 3 main pieces of evidence that support the charge against Guo Wengui as a rapist:\n\n- -\"-\n\nraping <sup>a</sup> female secretary\n\nraping her 3. The one-hour-fortf\n\nDo you still think it isn't enough?\n\nMa Rui\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\n![](_page_39_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\nHePE4725.5MEW‡RA\\$MRE½kfAMI-5.5\\$M1\n\nR9±\\$2We4445. REMEREMERRHERM4EE. RT M@WHAfNEWK¥. Q <sup>5</sup> <sup>12</sup> <sup>1</sup> Q <sup>11</sup>\n\n![](_page_39_Picture_5.jpeg)\n\n<sup>I</sup> seldom heard about billionaires raping women when <sup>I</sup> was living in mainland China. The rich people usually used money to win the hearts of women, as raping not only is dangerous, it also\n\n-\n- makes one person lose his social status. Once it is discovered, the rich man will lose face. The\n- business world also looks down on those low class guys who rely on raping women to expand\n\nhttp\n\n## audio recording. That is the voice of Guo Wengui and Wang Ping. It is hard to fabricate.\n\n联社的报道佐证了部分事实。… , 请问该合同的签字人是不是你？你在:\n\nthe number of women they own. But what convinces me that Guo Wengui committed rape is that\n\n<sup>H</sup> 255tnWE NM>R5159W- M5 MM•\n\nRuhR NMJiOMtTidlMEMSE•EAR tAum (personal knowledge)EHIITE T 5\n\n538 @sinofreedom\n\nQ <sup>10</sup> <sup>13</sup> <sup>6</sup> Q <sup>20</sup>\n\n<sup>&</sup>gt; WRO\n\n<http>\n\nfamiliar with their voices.\n\nhttp\n\n- <sup>I</sup> believe my argu:nent is enough to coñviñcc the judge and the jury because my personal\n- knowledge is established based on the following:\n\n2. I have the assessment reports from the Australian and Canadian voiceprint identification\n\n1. <sup>I</sup> have had <sup>a</sup> lot of face-to-face contacts with Wang Yanping and Guo Wengui. <sup>I</sup> am\n\n![](_page_40_Picture_7.jpeg)\n\nEtfililrd WMWitWjMMìIEE ? 5:21 AM - 11 Jul 2019 B Retweets 48 Likes\n\n<sup>I</sup> have listened to the recording of Guo Wengui and Wangyanpiñg's interrogation on Ma Rui <sup>5</sup>\n\nraped, for example, the underwear cent=-h=tad by bodily fluid, the blood-stained bed sheet, the\n\nlocations of the offenses and whether or not the boat staff and security guards were present etc. If\n\ntimes. There are <sup>9</sup> occasions where Ma Rui was coerced to hand over the evidences of being\n\nname of the pharmacy for getting birth-control pills, the number of times of being raped, the\n\nthe judge asks me next time why <sup>I</sup> think Guo is <sup>a</sup> rapist, <sup>I</sup> will reply, \"If Guo Wengui didn't commit such an outrageous rape, why would he need to use every means to destroy these\n\nQ <sup>13</sup> 1.3 <sup>8</sup> Q <sup>48</sup>\n\nevidences?\"\n\nFollow\n\nreal.\"\n\n![](_page_41_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\nTE-FA IRA <sup>&</sup>gt; hiti551-BEEf4MkD91 ? twitter.corn/slnofreedom/st...\n\ntht0&W · Ltk0\\$42 ftM R <sup>&</sup>gt; EMEMBRò4etR • WEWJLtt\n\nIf the judge asks me, \"How can you confirm that the audio clip about Wang Yanping and Guo\n\nthe analysis reports from Australian and Canadian voiceprint identification companies. The\n\nbelieve that the audio clip about Wang Yanping and Guo Wengui interrogating Ma Rui is\n\nreport published by Associated Press has also corroborated with part of the facts. Therefore, <sup>I</sup>\n\nMy reply will be, \"I have had face-to-face contacts with Guo Wengui on three occasions, while <sup>I</sup> have once with Wang Yanping. <sup>I</sup> am very familiar with their voices and intonations. Also, <sup>I</sup> have\n\n¾†) ·\n\n9 <sup>2</sup> t-1 <sup>1</sup> Q <sup>11</sup>\n\nhttp\n\n5:59 AM - 11 Jul 2019 1 Retweet 11 Likes\n\n![](_page_42_Picture_3.jpeg)\n\nhttp\n\nilhst ! Q <sup>11</sup> <sup>13</sup> <sup>13</sup> Q <sup>77</sup> http\n\nIn the case of Liar Guo suing Xia Yeliang, Guo origiñally had several witñêsses, but he withdrew\n\nright path, there are more helps available to him; otherwise, none awaits him ahead. A thug who\n\nall the witnesses at the very last minute. Evcataally it ended up with him being alone as the plaintiff and the only witness. He didn't even trust Wang Yanping who followed him for so many years, worrying that there might be unexpected things coming up. When <sup>a</sup> person is in\n\nhas no shame and trustworthiness will eventually head to the path of demise alone.\n\n![](_page_43_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\n..-.., -......- . -.... . ..... - u.m ,..m............-\n\nQ <sup>13</sup> ¤ <sup>25</sup> Q <sup>82</sup>\n\nhttp\n\nSince the exposure of the audio clip about Guo Wengui and his secretary Wang Yanping interrogating Ma Rui together, Ms. Wang accepted the interview from Der Spiegel, leaving\n\nrecorded proof of her voice. After verification from the Australian J.-l; ;-1 authorities, the audio clip of Wang Yanping having an interview with Der Spiegel is the same as the audio clip of her\n\n![](_page_44_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · May 23\n\n5 23 T Bl-EE a Fol F¤'JE:MBAf45fit\\$ WIBtMrajSveWf#796A 1i11 11âeM MAEfñ\\$ ? \\$ÉEMIJG BEitillRA ? \\$ME\n\nME41% <sup>&</sup>gt; 1296A Rith ? <sup>1003</sup> MEEREE\\$ ? IMitifiWEAMII?1249\n\n-551a itiM\\$?\n\nQ <sup>7</sup> t7 <sup>1</sup> Q <sup>23</sup> http\n\n![](_page_44_Picture_8.jpeg)\n\nshow that you and Han Lianchan gave Strategic Vision a list of 96-people to be investigated. Are\n\nyou the one who signed that contract? What was your position in Eastem Profit? What is the purpose of you investigating these <sup>96</sup> people? Where did the \\$1,000,000 investigation fee come\n\nNext time when (I) see Wang Yanping, (I) must ask her the following questions: Court papers\n\nfrom? In what way was the money transferred to the States? How is this amount of money\n\nThere was an õecasioñ where Guo Wengui assaulted Wang Yanping after he got drunk. Not only\n\nse B4HBUIJthatiB •\n\nSEf#9 SEM-‡¥ne • Hegm \\$E#JWe\n\nrecording of this audio clip\n\nrelated to the Guo Wengui's money laundering case in Hong Kong? 515 @sinofreedom May <sup>12</sup> W- WAnMWm8415%Em. MTRERI Eneman M+1 n\n\nand be reunited with your husband and children, old Guo is unreliable.\"\n\nhttp\n\nhttp\n\nHi @sinofreedom RM15 W \\$EEWARRWE@85•WMERA\\$@RW-T4 \\$\n\nMW.MaW1ame nm\\$A•E-MeM&M\n\nW . EWitfit We .\n\nQ <sup>37</sup> t3 <sup>5</sup> Q <sup>23</sup>\n\ntwItter.com/TangHan3296711...\n\ndid he rape Wang, he also stepped on her belly violently. There was <sup>a</sup>\n\n![](_page_45_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · May 12\n\nHi§ @sinofreedom May <sup>12</sup> RMIM W SE@WARRWEMBE-WWERAM RW-Tà \\$2\n\n| <div>[Text Thumbnail]</div> | <p><b>唐汉</b> @TangHan32967114</p> <p>母亲节特别专辑</p> <p>\"当我离开中国时, 我的儿子是一岁五个月, 现在他差不多六岁, 该上学了.\"...</p> |\n|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n\nQ <sup>27</sup> t-1 <sup>9</sup> O <sup>34</sup>\n\n![](_page_45_Picture_8.jpeg)\n\nhttp <sup>I</sup> told Wang Yañpiñg that you have no future if you follow Guo Wengui. Guo never has any loyalty to his friends. He uses peopic when they have value to him and he throws them away like <sup>a</sup> piece of cleaég shred if they have lost their value to him. <sup>I</sup> hope that she can report to the NYPD accusing Guo Wengui raping and assaulting her. This action will turn her situation from\n\n### losing to winning\n\nHi\\$ @sinofreedom . May <sup>5</sup> v WNN1MWh?WEA 7, RGP AXE\\$ ( NEE¥, RW:Eg\n\niM tg, -tjgestRs. gagm-ta <sup>p</sup> aggg\n\n## MR95, M85E9128.ET5, WÛReREERMS, WRM iÄMEil!lREM\n\nhttp\n\nShow this thread\n\nhttp\n\nYañpiñg before the PAX trial. <sup>I</sup>\n\n\\$2 @TangHan32967114 · May <sup>5</sup>\n\nWRREWiltT GTER, E h311tT2P9MtUE75i8R11\\$l\n\nN28 \\$7, Efth0 ERWt E EM. igft, littile-iâ‡E\n\nAbout the case of Guo Wengui suing the three people inch ding Ye Ling, <sup>I</sup> have asked Wang\n\nsaid, \"According to Guo Baosheng, this contract was drafted by\n\nYan.\"\n\nWang Yanping replied\n\nyou Wang Yanping, and har.ded over to Guo Baosheng and Zhao\n\nQ <sup>1</sup> t\\_-1 O <sup>12</sup> 1\n\nBoss!\"\n\nhaRetWEER. 5MRAMS. WERE\n\nHi\\$ @sinofreedom · Apr <sup>28</sup> v\n\n4. R1-\\*i&BMtâ2. DJMe±, iTRH&@E. EER&BET.\n\nIf Wang Yanping wants to save her own ass, the only way is to file <sup>a</sup> report in the police station, accusing someone for sexual assa--it The evidcñcc is very easy and simple, there are <sup>a</sup> lot of\n\nspy for CCP,\n\nthat she didn't know and everything had been arranged by Guo Wengui. It looks like Guo Wengui was using <sup>a</sup> fake contract to test the loyalty of his followers. If the truth was found out,\n\nevidence of sexual assault against Xi Nuo, and Guo Wengui has offered several millian dollars for the investigation. Hi§ @sinofreedom Apr <sup>30</sup> v\n\nhe would sue the followers in court. It has been understood that the contract was designed to get\n\nH M IEVME S-RRWWWWWW, WW48TM ER84 a\n\nH \\$‡#WA.R45, \\$2, MMtE W •WRWW4 H-52 MS-4\n\nQ <sup>9</sup> t2 <sup>4</sup> Q <sup>59</sup> http\n\n![](_page_46_Picture_7.jpeg)\n\nmoney to hire female Yanping replied, \"Smart\n\nsecretaries?\"\n\n1E55588, -\n\nQ <sup>30</sup> <sup>12</sup> <sup>5</sup> Q <sup>35</sup> 1\n\nhttp 60?s=20\n\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|\n\n|  | <div><b>西诺</b> @sinofreedom · Apr 28</div> <p>我在与王燕萍交谈中谈到一个逻辑问题: A非C, B非C, 请问A等于B? 燕萍一脸茫然。我继续解释, 老共反郭, 西诺反郭, 请问老共等于西诺吗? 燕萍不吱声。我再解释, 我讨厌吃花椰菜, 布什总统也讨厌吃花椰菜, 西诺等于布什。燕萍笑了。</p> <div><span>9</span><span>1</span><span>27</span></div> |\n|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|\n\n**Show this thread**\n\nhttp\n\n**FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/2019 06:22 PM** INDEX NO. 157786/2019\n\nQ <sup>9</sup> t--L <sup>1</sup> Q <sup>27</sup> 1 Show this thread http\n\n<sup>I</sup> raised <sup>a</sup> logic question when <sup>I</sup> was having <sup>a</sup> conversation with Wang Yañ3pus, \"A is not C, B is not C, then is A the same as B?\" Yanping looked confused. <sup>I</sup> continued explaining, \"Old CCP is against Guo, Xi Nuo is against Guo, then is Old CCP the same as Xi silent. <sup>I</sup> continued expla ning, \"I hate eating cauliflowers, President Bush also hated eating cauliflowers, Xi Nuo is the same as President Bush.\" Yanping laughed.\n\nNuo?\"\n\nsaid, \"Yanping, stop giving ycarself <sup>a</sup> hard\n\nYañpiñg stayed\n\nunreliable.\"\n\nhttp\n\nand, but I could tell she had her concerns and dilemma with no one to \\$RHe8515 95 NSW:5 TEMENT E tWEfe\n\n![](_page_47_Picture_5.jpeg)\n\n### f - -NMies !\n\nQ <sup>28</sup> t\\_3 <sup>10</sup> Q <sup>79</sup> http\n\nE. 4W3T9 5 REE. Wf48 MeWWEnW-tetWe E\n\n-Eft±%14292 WR¾2tRWfRNME - M 55% <sup>&</sup>gt; HMiEMB\n\nRA4RWE9]tA093-4RMMREE>5887tM RAT-\n\nTo my surprise, <sup>I</sup> bumped into Wang Yanping today. She took the initiative to say hi to me. We were old seq2siñtsñces. <sup>I</sup> chatted with her for around <sup>10</sup> minutes. We talked about her work, her\n\nWhen <sup>I</sup> said goodbye to Wang Yañpiñg yesterday, <sup>I</sup>\n\nhttp\n\ntime, go back home and be rc=ªra with your husband and children, old Guo is Yairpiñg didn't respond, but <sup>I</sup> could tell she had her concerns and dilemma with no one to\n\nHi§ @sinofreedom -\n\nconfide with. She is also a unfortunate kid. Lost her sense at one point!\n\nQ <sup>35</sup> t\\_7 <sup>14</sup> Q <sup>72</sup>\n\nApr 26\n\nfamily and the ongoing lawsuits. We also talked about the people whom we are both fssi'isr with. Ms. Wang had sadness all over her face. She didn't comb her hair properly, and her face\n\n![](_page_48_Picture_3.jpeg)\n\nJutVR\\$97. EWith49REi\\$3-. 20ff1IM200M5i;, igIV\n\nû\\$M. ERMNe\\$WfRW. 51%d VR7, 278778MM W. 11MinRK7, Ei REW5. leges, R2aaM7J30gRE\n\n![](_page_48_Picture_6.jpeg)\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · Feb 21\n\nQ <sup>6</sup> t-1 <sup>2</sup> Q <sup>22</sup> 1\n\nhttp Based on the audio evidence that Wang Yañpiñg left, we conducted two separate and\n\nindepcñdent voiceprint analyses in Australia and Canada at the same time. The analysis results\n\nshow that, the audio file of Wang Yañpiñg having an interview with Der Spiegel is highly\n\nShow this thread\n\nhttp\n\nmoney to you for your spy operation?\n\n5% @sinofreedom . Feb <sup>21</sup> <sup>v</sup>\n\nemihr to the voice recording of Wang Yaspiñg interrogatiñg Ma Rui.\n\n2018\\$119978151 V-3T&M #digE , it EliWht. <sup>18</sup> Ef£¾R\n\nYou directed Wang Yañpiñg to sign the contract with T&M compañy in Jan <sup>2018</sup> and continue\n\nto follow Ling Wa=¹·--=g. Was the cost for this contract from your loan as well? Who will lend\n\nQ <sup>2</sup> t-1 Q <sup>15</sup>\n\nHi\\$ @sinofreedom · Jan <sup>18</sup> v 25, \\$RW1RiTFiM1Elit-WfM2 \\$MiPJ·E\\$.E@B@‡iR@\\$R, 5 E\\$E@EE 4‡Wi47522 mus, eAg eW Eagne EEP M9ER. BaME WW\\$‡mR92.E\\$ messwas AM5%JE9. W T\\$52M5E £ìiEMitE2 ? E†‡f ReR T WJ\n\n<http>\n\nQ <sup>3</sup> tT <sup>4</sup> Q <sup>37</sup> 1 http\n\n![](_page_49_Picture_5.jpeg)\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · Jan 14\n\nRPG\n\nIFf!\n\nagainst Xia Yeliang and Li Hongkuan has alicady applied for withdrawal. What is surprising is that in Guo Wengui's confirmation letter that Daniel submitted to the court is setesily signed in Yanping's handwriting. This is very rare in <sup>a</sup> US lawsuit. The proper way of doing this sheüld be having <sup>a</sup> notary's stamp and signature. Does Liar Guo even want to save <sup>2</sup> dollars in notary fee? This liar is really stupid!\n\nIt has been karned that the counsel Daniel Watt who is retained by Guo Wengui for <sup>a</sup> lawsuit\n\nHit @sinofreedom · Jan <sup>14</sup> v RIEtWB14-'5®J VEM, MIEEEVMMRt\\$ . MRM10iuJsV200% D. 25857, 3-EVfiR\\$5, EE9iAe1853ttlit liiijitii. JEt\\$RR\n\nEE47EM@200%E013 B. WJ PENETR-EMARE7.\n\nbannedbook.org/bnews/guowengu...\n\nKRRsRWER, 200%am\\$-†AA Ag, gas Jm\\$Wm9Yr,\n\nE k\\$ @XiaYeliang · Jan <sup>13</sup> W!ll WATM R \\$i\\$£fWGI)i]ìjl!E8254t\\$: l!If0ŒEV MASWARM H -‡E MM\n\nrecording released by RPG (a twitter account) isn't fake!\n\nQ LT <sup>8</sup> Q <sup>31</sup> 1\n\n<sup>I</sup> remember <sup>I</sup> made <sup>a</sup> bet with Chen Xiaoping at that time, saying if Wang Yanping appeared on camera for an interview again, <sup>I</sup> would give him USD 200. In the end, <sup>I</sup> lost the bet. Not only did Wang Yañpiñg appear on camera, she also admitted she had been <sup>a</sup> CCP member for <sup>18</sup> years. <sup>I</sup>\n\nthen offered to give Chen Xiaoping the USD <sup>200</sup> that <sup>I</sup> lost in the bet when <sup>I</sup> encountered him later on. Chen Xiaoping just stared at me and then left. However, <sup>I</sup> had no bad intents (I) spent\n\nUSD 200 in exchange for an anthentic voice. <sup>I</sup> then sent the voice to Canada for an analysis. The\n\ndays.\"\n\nHi\\$ @sinofreedom - Dec 13, <sup>2018</sup> v RW\\$tRRMM3857. MIM: RW <sup>W</sup> 57J M7J-Ran BARR 7. SEE?eW: 22. \\$2RREN1527. W:222 Ninfe-B1MA. MeM7? M: W2, WW\n\n## -RM 2|kEfM 5, Ma (E) TRS57? W: SepRMS\n\n4, WM. Q <sup>12</sup> LT <sup>11</sup> Q <sup>65</sup> 1 http 617344?s=20 Guo Wengui found that the front part of his shoe was worn yesterday. He asked Wang Yanping,\n\n\"This pair of leather shoes cost me USD 50,000, <sup>I</sup> have worn them for just <sup>a</sup> few days and they were torn! What's happened?\" Yanping replied, \"Boss Guo, you tiptoed too much these Guo said, \"I have been tip-toeing for quite some time, my shoes weren't torn back then. Why would they be torn now?\" Yanping said, \"Boss Guo, you insisted on putting three layers of paint on <sup>a</sup> good pair of shoes, isn't that how the cow leather get torn?\" Guo then said, \"Whatever you say, it makes sense.\" Hi\\$ @sinofreedom . Nov 2, <sup>2018</sup> v\n\nRMEMM , 4R MEB i]8e¾%-195†B, iMe5MMG-<sup>8</sup> k\\$bRNR1, TMEd. TMMk±efe-EEV? MER REMO WM, MEVM, is WMM7M. RMMW MEE . P5. 588. -BE. 159, U-tfeENE125EE 4M?\n\nhttp\n\nQ <sup>18</sup> tT <sup>20</sup> Q <sup>68</sup> 1\n\nHuang Hebian issued <sup>a</sup> public notice that there would be an announcement at PST <sup>8</sup> o'clock\n\nregarding the last and trusted female subordinate of Guo betrayed him and left him without <sup>a</sup>\n\nGuo-- Qu Guojiao, Yu Yong, Yang Xinxin, Ma Rui and Wang Yanping. Are there any of them\n\nYanping left, Guo's world will collapse in half. Take <sup>a</sup> look at the people who followed Liar\n\nnotice. Wondering if this lady is Wang Yanping. She is the steward that Guo trusted the most. If","body_zh":"证据 B\n\n*United States v. Yanping Wang*（美国诉王雁平案），案号：S1 23-CR-118 (AT)\nSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK（纽约州最高法院纽约县）\n\nYANPING WANG a/k/a YVETTE WANG（王雁平，又名伊薇特·王），\n\n原告，\n\n诉\n\nXIANMIN XIONG a/k/a XI NUO a/k/a SINO（熊宪民，又名西诺，又名Sino），\n\n被告。\n\n索引号：__________________ 购买日期：______________\n\n原告指定纽约县为审理地点。\n\n依据 CPLR 503(a)，管辖地依据为原告住所地（纽约县）。\n传票\n致上述被告：\n\n特此传唤你对本诉讼中的经核实起诉书作出答辩，并在本传票送达之日起 20 日内（不包括送达当日）将你的答辩状副本送达至下列原告律师（若本传票未在纽约州内亲自向你交付送达，则在送达完成之日起 30 日内）；若你未能出庭或答辩，将依法针对你作出缺席判决，判处本传票所要求的救济。\n\n日期：纽约州纽约市，2019年8月8日\n\n致：Xianmin Xiong（熊宪民） 136-84 Roosevelt Avenue, Apt. A83 Flushing, New York 11354\nCATAFAGO FINI LLP（卡塔法戈·菲尼有限责任合伙律师事务所）\n\n/s/ Tom M. Fini\n\nTom M. Fini, Esq. Jacques Catafago, Esq. The Empire State Building 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7710 New York, NY 10118 212-239-9669 tom@catafagofini.com 原告律师\nSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK（纽约州最高法院纽约县）\n\nYANPING WANG a/k/a YVETTE WANG（王雁平，又名伊薇特·王），\n\n原告，\n\n诉\n\n索引号：__________________\n\nXIANMIN XIONG a/k/a XI NUO a/k/a SINO（熊宪民，又名西诺，又名Sino），\n\n被告。\n\n经核实的起诉书\n\n原告王雁平（又名伊薇特·王，以下简称“原告”）针对被告熊宪民（又名西诺，又名Sino，以下简称“被告”）提起诉讼，通过其下述署名律师陈述如下：\n导言\n\n1. 本诉讼旨在制止并纠正被告针对原告持续进行的威胁、诽谤和骚扰行为，该行为现已升级为被告接近原告并威胁要杀害她。事实上，在被告最近对原告发出死亡威胁之后，他仍继续直接在原告的工作地点外进行跟踪骚扰。\n\n2. 因此，原告请求获得（除其他事项外）补偿性赔偿和惩罚性赔偿，以及一项禁止被告继续其恶意且不懈的诽谤、骚扰和恐吓活动并禁止进一步损害原告声誉的命令。\n当事人与管辖权\n\n3. 原告为女性个人，在与本案相关的任何时候均系纽约州纽约县的成年居民。\n\n4. 被告为男性个人，据知情和确信，在与本案相关的任何时候均系纽约州的成年居民。\n\n5. 鉴于双方当事人均为纽约州居民，本院具有适当的管辖权。\n\n6. 依据 CPLR 503(a)，鉴于原告居住于纽约县，且\n\n被告在纽约县实施了本文详述的许多侵权行为，因此审判地是适当的。\n背景事实\n被告对原告持续进行的诽谤与骚扰\n骚扰活动的背景\n\n7. 被告恐吓原告的活动始于他在网络社交媒体平台上反复且恶意地发布有关原告的虚假和诽谤性内容。如下文详述，这些诽谤性帖子包括公然捏造的指控：原告作为一名已婚女性，与另一名男子保持婚外性关系；原告据称被一名同事强奸；原告销毁了与法律诉讼相关的证据；以及原告对法律诉讼中的所谓证人进行了非法审讯和拘禁。被告在明知这些指控属虚假的情况下仍作出上述所有虚假指控，并抱有恶意意图摧毁原告的声誉和事业，使她每天处于恐惧之中。\n\n8. 这些诽谤性言论尤为恶劣，因为原告并非公众人物，而是一个无辜的女性——一名妻子和母亲——是一家私营公司工作的普通个人。\n\n9. 被告针对原告的活动持续不断。例如，在 2017年8月26日，被告在其 Twitter（推特）账户上向其约 31,500 名关注者发布推文，称被称为“雁平大姐”的原告与一名叫“Robert”的男子关系亲密。具体而言，被告在推特上发布了如下诽谤性言论：“Robert跟雁平大姐关系亲密。他没有像样的立场，眼里只有钱。”该推文的完整真实副本及经认证的翻译件作为证据 A 附于本起诉书后。\n\n10. 上述诽谤性推文向公众传达了关于原告的虚假事实陈述，即原告——一名已婚女性——正与一名叫 Robert 的男子保持婚外亲密关系。\n\n11. 随后，在 2017年9月5日，被告发布了另一条关于原告的令人愤慨且具诽谤性的评论，这一次声称引用了一段原告关于其与男性同事 Guo Wengui（郭文贵）关系的假采访，而被告虚假声称该采访由原告接受。具体而言，被告在推特上发布：\n\n> 王雁平今天否认推特上公布的她与郭文贵发生性关系的录音属实。她甚至全盘否认她与马蕊之间的对话录音属实。对于涉及郭文贵的所谓强奸案，她未作任何置评。\n\n该推文的完整真实副本及经认证的翻译件作为证据 B 附于本起诉书后。\n\n12. 被告上述言论再次向公众传达了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述。具体而言，被告虚假指控原告与其丈夫以外的男子发生性关系，且原告共谋参与了对另一名女性的强奸。\n\n13. 次日，即 2017年9月6日，被告再次发布了一条关于原告的诽谤性推文。在这条帖子中，被告虚构了一段原告（被称为“雁”）与另一名女性（被称为“马”）之间的对话。这篇虚假对话向公众传达了原告协助恐吓马蕊并参与恐吓犯罪证人的信息。具体而言，被告在推特上发布了以下内容：\n\n> 雁：我非常喜欢马妹妹，她是一个非常天真的孩子。马：你助纣为虐，把我扣留在公寓里。雁：她性格内向，可能患有抑郁症。马：你抢走了我的手机，逼我不准报警。\n\n雁：网上所谓王雁平与马蕊的所有对话录音都是假的。\n\n马：你可能以为你能欺骗一部分人，你可以在一段时间内欺骗他们，但你永远无法永远欺骗所有人。\n\n该推文的完整真实副本及其正文的经认证翻译件作为\n\n证据 A 附于本起诉书后。\n\n14. 上述推文向公众发表了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述。具体而言，它指控原告非法拘禁和威胁另一名女性，并向公众传达原告在其参与这些非法行为方面说谎。\n\n15. 不到一个月的 2017年10月12日，被告再次发布了另一条关于原告的诽谤性推文。具体而言，被告在推特上发布：\n\n> 王雁平：你必须想清楚。马蕊的案子马上就要变成刑事案件了。你肯定会成为被告之一，因为你涉嫌协助郭文贵销毁法医物证。在这一关键时刻，你首先应该起诉郭文贵性侵，毕竟这是事实。你被郭文贵骗得很惨——你回不了家，你出于自己的选择同孩子和丈夫分开了。一旦你在法院被起诉，事情就很难挽回了。放聪明点，立刻起诉郭文贵，扭转局面，把形势控制在自己手中。\n\n该推文的完整真实副本及经认证的翻译件作为证据 A 附于本起诉书后。\n\n16. 上述诽谤性推文向公众传达了关于原告的虚假事实陈述，即原告协助销毁了与犯罪相关的证据，原告遭到了性侵，以及原告容忍自己遭受性侵。\n\n17. 上述诽谤性言论——均属虚假且毫无事实根据——是被告在明知其虚假的情况下恶意发表的，发表目的只能是造成直接且近因的损害，以毁坏原告的声誉、其商业关系以及她与其丈夫的关系。\n原告据以主张诽谤索赔的诽谤性言论\n\n18. 被告恐吓原告的活动不仅在继续，而且其凶狠程度及其彻底摧毁原告家庭生活和事业的明显意图还在加剧。作为这项旨在摧毁原告生活的活动的一部分，被告开展了以下一系列网络发帖，均旨在毁坏原告的声誉并使其与家庭隔绝。\n\n19. 2019年1月18日，被告发布推文，虚假指控原告抄袭其同事郭的签名。具体而言，被告的推文称：\n\n> 获悉，郭文贵聘请用于起诉夏业良和李洪宽案的律师 Daniel Watt 已经申请退出。令人吃惊的是，在 Daniel 提交给法院的郭文贵确认函中，实际上是雁平的字迹签名。[强调为后加]\n\n该推文的完整真实副本及经认证的翻译件作为证据 C 附于本起诉书后。\n\n20. 被告上述诽谤性推文向公众传达了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述。具体而言，该推文虚假地传达了原告非法伪造了与法律诉讼相关的证据。\n\n21. 2019年4月26日，一则 YouTube（优兔）视频被上传，其中被告\n\n讨论了王女士在一次审判中的证词。具体而言，被告陈述称：\n\n所以我要告诉大家今天早上的审判情况。早上有三位证人接受了询问，第一个作证的是王雁平……律师随后问她是否知道离岸公司XXX购买这栋楼的情况。她回答说不知道。然而，律师拿着一叠文件说：“所有这些文件都是你签的，你却对这些一无所知？”她随后结结巴巴地说她非常紧张，她已经把这些事情忘了，请原谅她。所以，很明显她在这些事情上撒谎了。[强调为后加]\n\n该 YouTube 视频文字记录的相关摘录的真实正确副本及经认证的翻译件作为证据 B 附于本起诉书后。\n\n22. 被告对上述引用的原告证词的描述属虚假，并明确\n\n向公众传达了关于原告的所谓事实的诽谤性陈述，具体而言，\n\n即原告在宣誓后非法提供了虚假证词。\n\n23. 两天后的 2019年4月28日，被告发布了又一条关于\n\n原告的诽谤性推文。在这条新推文中，被告虚假声称原告知道某起\n\n性侵事件却未予报案。具体而言，被告在推特上发布：\n\n王雁平要想自保，唯一的办法就是去警察局报案，指控某人性侵。证据非常简单容易，网上有很多音频片段。如果她到了这一步还顾忌在公众面前丢面子，那她就太蠢了。[强调为后加]\n\n该推文的完整且正确副本及经认证的译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n24. 两周后，于 2019 年 5 月 12 日，被告再次就原告所谓未报案遭受性侵一事发表虚假推文，具体推文称：\n\n我告诉王艳平（Wang Yanping），你跟着郭文贵（Guo Wengui）是没有前途的。郭对他的朋友从来没有任何忠诚可言。别人对他有利用价值时他就利用，一旦失去利用价值就当作抹布一样扔掉。我希望她能向 NYPD（纽约市警察局）报案，指控郭文贵强奸和侵犯她。此举将使她的处境反败为胜 [后加的强调]\n\n该推文的完整且正确副本及经认证的译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n25. 就在同一天，即 2019 年 5 月 12 日，被告还发推称：\n\n有一次郭文贵喝醉酒后侵犯了王艳平。他不仅强奸了王，还暴力踩踏她的腹部。网上有这段音频片段的录音。当时瓦力（Wa Li）似乎也在场。[后加的强调]\n\n该推文的完整且正确副本及译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n26. 上述引用的三条推文明确向公众传达了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述。具体而言，这些推文虚假地传达了原告是一名强奸受害者，以及原告虽已婚却与另一名男子发生性关系。这些推文还虚假地传达了原告通过不举报其据称知悉的罪行而妨碍司法公正。\n\n27. 2019 年 6 月 7 日，被告又发表了一条推文，在其中虚假指控原告“审讯”马蕊（Ma Rui）。具体而言，被告发推称：\n\n自从曝光了郭文贵与其秘书王艳平一起审讯马蕊的音频片段以来，王女士接受了《明镜周刊》（Der Spiegel）的采访，留下了她的声音录音证据。经澳大利亚司法当局核实，王艳平接受《明镜周刊》采访的音频片段与她审讯马蕊的音频片段一致。该证据已提交给法院。[后加的强调]\n\n该推文的完整且正确副本及译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n28. 上述推文明确向公众传达了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述，即原告参与了对一起法律诉讼程序中证人的不当审讯。\n\n29. 2019 年 7 月 11 日，被告发表了另一条推文，虚假陈述原告（被称为“Wangyanping”）和郭文贵审讯了马蕊并强迫其销毁证据。具体而言，被告指称如下内容：\n\n> 我已经听了郭文贵和王艳平审讯马蕊的录音 5 遍。有 9 次马蕊被强迫交出被强奸的证据，例如被体液污染的内裤、沾有血迹的床单、购买避孕药的药房名称、被强奸的次数、犯罪地点以及船员和保安是否在场等。[后加的强调]\n\n该推文的完整且正确副本及译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n30. 上述推文明确向公众作出了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述，即原告对一起法律诉讼程序的证人进行了不当审讯并实施非法强迫以销毁证据。\n\n31. 2019 年 7 月 13 日，被告再次发表了关于原告的诽谤性推文，虚假断言存在原告与郭文贵审讯马蕊的所谓录音磁带。具体而言，被告发推称：“支持指控郭文贵为强奸犯的 3 个主要证据是：3. 郭文贵和王艳平审讯马蕊的一小时四十分钟的音频片段[。]”[后加的强调] 该推文的完整且正确副本及译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n32. 上述诽谤性推文向公众传达了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述，具体而言即原告参与了对一起法律诉讼程序证人马蕊长达近两小时的不当审讯。\n\n33. 2019 年 7 月 13 日，被告发表了一条包含 YouTube 视频链接的推文。被告将该视频描述为：“盘古（Pangu）老板郭文贵在办公室与女秘书王艳平发生性关系[。]”[后加的强调]。该推文的完整且正确副本及译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n34. 上述诽谤性推文向公众传达了关于原告的虚假和诽谤性事实陈述，具体而言即原告作为一名已婚女性，在办公室与一名男同事发生了性关系。\n\n35. 当天晚些时候，被告发表了另一条提及同一视频的诽谤性推文。具体而言，被告在相关部分发推称：\n支持郭文贵作为强奸嫌疑人的新证据是：***\n4. 郭文贵强奸和侵犯王艳平的音频片段\n\n[后加的强调]\n\n该推文的完整且正确副本及译文作为附件 C 附于本诉状后。\n\n36. 上述诽谤性推文向公众传达了关于原告的虚假事实陈述，具体而言即原告遭受了强奸和侵犯，以及原告作为一名已婚女性，与另一名男子发生了性关系。\n\n被告的骚扰行动在被告对原告当面发出死亡威胁时达到顶峰\n\n37. 被告意图恐吓原告并彻底破坏其家庭生活和商业信誉的行动，如今令人震惊地发展到了被告对原告当面发出死亡威胁的地步。\n\n38. 具体而言，于 2019 年 4 月 26 日，在位于 Centre 街 60 号的 New York County Supreme Court（纽约县最高法院）232 号法庭外，被告走向原告并在其身旁不怀好意地坐下，尽管原告要求其走开不要打扰她。在通过诽谤性帖子恐吓原告数月之后，被告接近原告的行为显然使原告对其人身伤害产生了恐惧，她多次要求被告走开，但遭到了被告的拒绝。\n\n39. 被告无视原告要求其走开的恳求，随后做出了不可思议之举：他对原告发出了死亡威胁，同时威胁性地将双拳和手臂朝原告的面部和身体猛冲并举起。具体而言，被告在朝原告举起双拳时对原告说道：\n“你会被车祸撞死。”\n“你再也见不到你的孩子或你的丈夫了。”\n“你是在自寻死路。”\n\n40. 被告坐在原告身旁对原告发出的死亡威胁使原告对其生命安全感到恐惧。原告再次恳求被告走开。然而，面对受惊吓且流泪的原告，被告仍坚持对原告这位无辜女性实施恐吓手段。被告朝原告猛冲头部和手臂，并继续进行言语辱骂和人身侵犯。\n\n41. 为进一步向原告明确其生命处于危险之中，被告提及了一名居住在法国且与原告年龄相仿的中国异见人士的非正常死亡。原告曾在法国居住了数年。\n\n42. 被告对原告发出死亡威胁系出于故意、怀有恶意，并具有导致原告对严重人身伤害或死亡产生恐惧的实际意图。被告的陈述客观上旨在引起原告的恐惧，并传达原告及其家人将遭受严重人身伤害和死亡的信息。\n\n被告通过出现在原告家门口并实施暴力恐吓，升级其死亡威胁\n\n43. 被告的恐吓行为并未止步于在法院发出的死亡威胁。在 2019 年 4 月 26 日对其生命发出威胁之后，被告现在通过直接来到原告家门口并实施暴力行为升级了死亡威胁，这一切都明确表明被告已准备好执行对其生命的威胁。如下文所述，被告多次来到原告的工作场所，尽管他并不在那个街区居住或工作，并且即便在叫来保安时其行为也依然暴力。\n\n44. 被告没有任何合理依据出现在原告工作场所附近，因为被告不在原告办公室所在的街区工作或居住。此种行为的唯一目的就是使原告对迫在眉睫的人身伤害产生恐惧。\n\n45. 首先，于 2019 年 7 月 25 日，在刚刚对原告当面发出死亡威胁不久后，被告突然直接出现在原告工作所在的大楼外（纽约州纽约县东 64 街 162 号）。被告在大楼外威胁性地潜伏了至少三十分钟。\n\n46. 次日，即 2019 年 7 月 26 日星期五，被告再次威胁性地出现在原告工作场所外（东 64 街 162 号），并在那里停留了至少三十分钟。随后，在 2019 年 7 月 27 日星期六，被告再次出现在原告工作场所外（东 64 街 162 号），并凶兆毕露地在大楼正门外停留了至少三十分钟。\n\n47. 随后，在 2019 年 7 月 29 日星期一，被告再次威胁性地直接出现在原告工作所在的大楼外。由于被告已多次出现在原告工作场所外，这次原告安排了一名安保团队成员出去询问被告的来意。令人震惊的是，被告不仅没有离开，反而与安保团队成员对峙，以暴力的方式将身体和手臂扑向该安保团队成员。\n\n48. 被告对安保人员的挑衅和暴力行为，进一步加剧了原告因被告持续进行的骚扰、恐吓、暴力和死亡威胁行为而对严重人身伤害和死亡产生的真实恐惧。\n\n49. 事实上，尽管前一天与保安发生了冲突，被告就在次日（2019 年 7 月 30 日）再次威胁性地直接出现在原告工作所在的大楼外，并试图进入大楼。这显然是为了企图伤害和骚扰原告，并进一步表明被告怀有恶意，且完全不受任何安保团队的威慑。\n\n50. 原告出于对其安全和福祉的担忧，向 NYPD 报了案，且原告获悉，针对被告犯罪行为的调查已经展开且目前仍在进行中。\n\n被告持续骚扰的行动还造成了严重的情感和经济损害，并破坏了她的婚姻\n\n51. 被告的恶意诽谤行动给原告的名誉造成了严重损害。被告的恶意诽谤行动还导致了原告婚姻的破裂，并使其无法见到幼子，因为除其他事项外，该行动还包括了关于持续存在的婚外性关系的虚假指控。由于名誉和婚姻遭受破坏，原告遭受了极大的精神损害。\n\n52. 被告的恶意诽谤活动还对原告的商业合同和业务关系造成了重大损害。原告是金融行业的顾问，专门就中国大陆存在的当地习俗、法规和政策提供咨询意见。她作为诚实守信的女性商界人士的声誉对其业务至关重要。因此，被告声称原告参与婚外情、毁灭证据以及审讯和恐吓刑事犯罪证人的诽谤性言论，显然对其业务领域造成了损害。\n\n53. 例如，由于原告对中国商业惯例拥有丰富的经验和了解，原告曾与 ACA Investment Management Limited（“ACA”）签订了一份报酬丰厚的咨询合同，根据该合同，原告就中国大陆存在的当地习俗、法规和政策向一家香港企业提供咨询。\n\n54. 根据与 ACA 的合同，原告每年可获得 $1.5 million。\n\n55. 被告知道原告与 ACA 的合同，以及她与 ACA 的预期商业关系。被告意图通过如上所述详细公开诽谤原告的方式，恶意破坏原告的商业关系，包括与 ACA 的关系。\n\n56. 被告成功破坏了原告与 ACA 的商业关系。在被告发起旨在破坏原告声誉的网络活动后，ACA 于 2017年8月前后联系了原告，并告知她，被告对原告的指控与其需要向客户群和业务合作伙伴塑造的形象不符，且由于该负面宣传，ACA 将终止与原告的关系。\n\n57. 因此，被告对原告的恶意诽谤不仅恐吓了她、破坏了她的声誉、破坏了她与丈夫和家庭的关系，而且还直接且近因地干扰了她与 ACA 的合同和预期商业关系。\n\n58. 事实上，由于与 ACA 合同的终止，仅失去这一商业关系一项，原告就遭受了数百万美元的损害赔偿损失。\n\n第一项救济请求（人身恐吓）\n\n59. 重复并援引上述各段，如同在此处完整陈述一样。\n\n60. 被告于 2019年4月26日对原告进行肢体冲突，包括向原告举起拳头并对她发出死亡威胁（如上文详细所述），旨在使原告产生遭受严重有害或冒犯性接触的恐惧，并对迫在眉睫的严重人身伤害和死亡产生极大恐惧。\n\n61. 原告实际且合理地对迫在眉睫的严重人身伤害和死亡感到恐惧，并遭受了严重的情绪困扰。\n\n62. 由于被告的人身恐吓行为，原告已经遭受并将继续遭受有待在审判中证明的损害。\n\n63. 除金钱赔偿外，原告还有权获得初步禁令和永久禁令救济，包括禁止被告接近原告或其住所或营业场所，或向原告或其家人发出任何进一步的威胁。\n\n64. 原告有权获得在审判中确定的补偿性赔偿金。此外，被告的行为是蓄意的、肆意的、故意的、无理的、恶意的和压迫性的，且蓄意漠视原告的权利，应以在审判中确定的惩罚性赔偿金予以惩罚。\n\n第二项救济请求（诽谤）\n\n65. 重复并援引上述各段，如同在此处完整陈述一样。\n\n66. 上文第 18 段至第 36 段中具体列出的、被告在其社交媒体个人资料中发布的关于原告的诽谤性言论毫无事实根据，是虚假和诽谤性的，并且不受任何特权的保护。\n\n67. 被告实际知道其发布的信息是虚假的，并且其行为出于恶意，包括意图骚扰原告并破坏其声誉和业务。或者，在明知的情况下发布关于公众非知名人士（原告）的高度贬损性信息，被告至少是以极不负责任的方式行事，且未适当考虑信息收集的标准。\n\n68. 被告发布的关于原告的虚假评论是出于伤害原告的意图并具有实际恶意。\n\n69. 被告的诽谤行为直接且近因地造成了原告的特别损害，包括但不限于对其声誉、商业关系、与丈夫和孩子的关系的损害，以及严重的情绪困扰。\n\n70. 除金钱赔偿外，原告还有权获得初步禁令和永久禁令救济，包括禁止被告的诽谤行为和对商业关系的干扰。由于被告已将原告的个人品格和声誉公开置于争议之中，原告有权获得确认被告言论虚假的确权判决。\n\n71. 原告有权获得在审判中确定金额的补偿性和惩罚性赔偿金。\n\n第三项救济请求（本身诽谤）\n\n72. 重复并援引上述各段，如同在此处完整陈述一样。\n\n73. 第 18 段至第 36 段中讨论的、被告在其社交媒体个人资料中发布的关于原告的诽谤性言论是虚假和诽谤性的，不受任何特权的保护。\n\n74. 被告实际知道其发布的信息是虚假的，并且其行为出于恶意，包括意图骚扰原告并破坏其声誉。或者，在明知的情况下发布关于公众非知名人士（原告）的高度贬损性信息，被告至少是以极不负责任的方式行事，且未适当考虑信息收集的标准。\n\n75. 被告关于原告的虚假言论包括指控原告犯有严重罪行，属于往往会在原告的行业、业务和职业中伤害原告并归咎于原告淫秽和不道德行为的类型。被告向公众发表的关于原告的虚假言论包括：原告作为已婚妇女，与另一名男子保持婚外性关系；原告据称被一名同事强奸；原告销毁了与法律程序相关的证据；原告参与了对法律程序中所谓证人的非法审讯和拘留。\n\n76. 发布的虚假评论是出于伤害原告的意图并具有实际恶意。\n\n77. 被告的诽谤行为直接且近因地造成了原告的损害，包括但不限于对其声誉、商业关系、与丈夫和孩子的关系的损害，以及严重的情绪困扰。\n\n78. 被告虚假言论的侵害性质是众所周知的自明事实，无需指控或证明。\n\n79. 因此，被告的虚假言论在无需证明特别损害的情况下即可起诉。\n\n80. 除金钱赔偿外，原告还有权获得初步禁令和永久禁令救济，包括禁止被告的诽谤行为和对商业关系的干扰。\n\n81. 由于被告已将原告的个人品格和声誉公开置于争议之中，原告有权获得确认被告言论虚假的确权判决。\n\n第四项救济请求\n（侵权干扰合同）\n\n82. 重复并援引上述各段，如同在此处完整陈述一样。\n\n83. 原告与 ACA 签订了一份有效的咨询服务合同。\n\n84. 被告知道原告与 ACA 的合同。\n\n85. 被告通过故意诱导 ACA 违约，故意干扰了原告与 ACA 的合同。\n\n86. 被告完全是出于恶意或通过不当手段行事。\n\n87. 作为被告恶意和不当行为的直接和近因后果，ACA 违反了与原告的合同。若非被告的不当行为，ACA 本不会违反与原告的合同。\n\n88. 作为被告恶意和不当行为的直接和近因后果，原告遭受了损害。为了弥补这些损害，原告有权获得在审判中确定金额的补偿性和惩罚性赔偿金。\n\n第五项救济请求\n（侵权干扰预期商业关系）\n\n89. 重复并援引上述各段，如同在此处完整陈述一样。\n\n90. 原告与 ACA 存在商业关系。\n\n91. 被告知道原告与 ACA 的商业关系，并故意对此进行干扰。\n\n92. 被告完全是出于恶意或通过不当手段行事。\n\n93. 被告的干扰直接且近因地对原告与 ACA 的关系造成了损害，ACA 终止与原告的商业关系便证明了这一点。作为被告恶意和不当行为的直接和近因后果，ACA 终止了与原告正在进行的业务往来。若非被告的不当行为，ACA 本会继续保持与原告的商业关系。\n\n94. 作为被告不当行为的直接和近因后果，原告有权获得在审判中确定金额的补偿性和惩罚性赔偿金。\n\n请求救济事项\n\n据此，原告请求针对被告作出如下判决：\n\n- (a) 在审判中确定金额的补偿性和惩罚性赔偿金；\n- (b) 初步和永久禁令救济，禁止被告及其各自的代理人、受雇人、雇员、管理人员和受让人，以及所有与其积极配合或参与其中的其他人，进一步发布关于原告的任何虚假、恶意、诽谤或重大误导性言论，或向原告发出任何死亡威胁；\n- (c) 初步和永久禁令救济，禁止被告及其各自的代理人、受雇人、雇员、管理人员和受让人，以及所有与其积极配合或参与其中的其他人，接近原告或其住所或营业场所；\n- (d) 确认被告关于原告的言论为虚假的确权判决；\n- (e) 判给律师费、诉讼费和开支；以及\n- (f) 法院认为公正和适当的其他及进一步的救济。\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 1\n\nNYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 收到日期 NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\n日期：纽约州纽约市 2019年8月8日\nCATAFAGO FINI LLP\n\n/s/ Tom M. Fini Tom M. Fini, Esq. Jacques Catafago, Esq. The Empire State Building 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7710 New York, NY 10118 212-239-9669 tom@catafagofini.com 原告律师\n\n核实声明\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州） ) ) 证明属实： COUNTY OF NEW YORK（纽约县） )\n\n我，Yanping Wang（王雁平），是上述诉讼中的原告。我已阅读上述起诉状并了解其内容。就我个人所知，除其中声明依知悉及相信而主张的事项外，其内容均为真实；至于那些事项，我相信其为真实。\n\nYANPING WANG\n\n于 2019年8月8日 在我面前签署并宣誓\n\nKarin Maistrello\n公证人\n\nKARIN MAISTRELLO 纽约州公证人 注册号 01MA6376654 纽约县认证 佣金/任期届满日 2022年6月18日\n附件 A\n\n宣誓书\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州） )\n\n) 证明属实\n\nCOUNTY OF QUEENS（皇后县） )\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州） ) ) 证明属实： COUNTY OF QUEENS（皇后县） )\n\n我，Shenyi Glass，是受聘于 TransPerfect 的语言专家，该公司是一家同时具备 ISO 9001:2008 和 EN 15038:2006 认证的翻译服务机构。我讲中文普通话已有 50\n\n年。我持有 New York State Court Interpreter（纽约州法庭口译员）和 National Healthcare\n\n以下文件据我所知及所信，是由中文至英文真实且准确的翻译：\n\nInterpreter（全美医疗口译员）认证。我研习普通话翻译已有 5 年。\n\n所附社交媒体帖文 TransPerfect Translations, Inc.（全译翻译有限公司）是一家在六大洲拥有 90 多处办事处的翻译机构，是\n\n翻译至上述语种对的领导者，其工作成果被全美及国际上的商业机构、政府\n\n2019年8月7日，星期二\n\nShengi Rivers\n\nhenyi Glass，\n\n普通话口译员兼笔译员\n\nTransPerfect Translations, Inc. 确认，所提供的翻译是根据我们通过 ISO 9001:2015 和 ISO 17100:2015 认证的质量管理体系制作的，且负责\n\n专业翻译领域的领导者。TransPerfect Translations, Inc. 拥有二十多年的经验\n\n上述翻译的代理人具备翻译和审核上述语种对文件的资格，且与源文件中指名的任何当事人均无关联。\n\n于2019年8月7日（星期三）在我面前宣誓\n\n公证人签名\n\n公证人印章\n\n公证人印章\n\nNOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州公证人） 编号 01 SH6352366 资质注册于 Omos 县 佣金届满日期 12-2 1-26z6\n\n![](_page_24_Picture_0.jpeg)\n\nO\n\nyoutube.com\n\n1844 - 21jul. 2017\n\n17 转推 E 喜欢\n\n公司报价\n\n黑客入侵。\n\n\"T&M\"\n\nGuo Wengui（郭文贵）指使 Wang Yanping（王雁平）从邮箱中窃取电子邮件内容。\n\n每个被黑客入侵的邮箱报价从 $US75,000 到 $US100,000 不等。\n\nhttp\n西诺\n@sinofreedom\n关注\n\n王雁平：你要想明白了，马蕊一案将要刑诉，\n\n你必然要成为被告之一，因为你有协助郭文贵\n\n毁灭犯罪证据的嫌疑，在这个关键时刻你必须\n\n抢先控告郭文贵性侵，这本来就是事实，你已\n\n经被郭文贵骗的很惨，有家不能回，有孩子老\n\n公活活拆散。你被告上法庭就很难翻身了，\n\n聪明一点立刻把郭告了，变被动为主动。\n\n翻译推文\n\n7:55 PM - 12 Oct 2017\n\n199 转推 66 喜欢\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/2019 06:22 PM INDEX NO. 157786/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\n关注\n\n翻译推文 7:55 PM - 12 Oct 2017\n\n王雁平：你要想明白了。马蕊一案将成为刑事案件。\n\n你必然会成为被告之一，因为你涉嫌协助郭文贵毁灭法医/犯罪证据。在这个关键时刻你必须抢先起诉郭文贵性侵，毕竟这是事实。你已经被郭文贵骗得很惨——你回不了家，且违背自愿地与你的孩子和丈夫分开了。一旦你在法庭上被起诉，就很难挽回局面了。聪明一点，立刻起诉\n\n郭文贵以扭转局势并掌控局面。\n\n199 转推 66 喜欢\n\n![](_page_26_Picture_0.jpeg)\n\n@ 翻译推文\n\nRobert（罗伯特）与雁平姐（王雁平）关系密切。他没有\n\no\n\n5:34 AM - 26 Aug 2017\n\n正当立场，只在乎钱。\n\n![](_page_27_Picture_0.jpeg)\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/2019 06:22 PM INDEX NO. 157786/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\nMP , -B : MhttM , tBREME Nit 9. 5 : tatBP9F61 , M884tM5 . -B : B fBR taten , 52ieR¥t8 . 5 : M1ftF$9\n\n关注\n\n![](_page_27_Picture_2.jpeg)\n\n翻译推文\n\n9:18 AM - 6 Sep 2017\n\n9:18 AM -\n\n网络上的都是假的。\n\n雁：我很喜欢马妹妹，她是一个很单纯的孩子。\n\n马：你助纣为虐，把我非法拘禁在公寓里。\n\n雁：她性格内向，可能患有抑郁症。\n\n雁平对马（蕊）之战。\n\n马：你抢了我的手机，强迫我不许报警。\n\n6 Sep 2017\n\n雁：网络上所有所谓的王雁平与马蕊的对话录音都是假的。\n\n@remonwangxt\n\n马：你助纣为虐，把我非法拘禁在公寓里。\n\n雁：网络上所有所谓的王雁平与马蕊的对话录音\n\n马：你可能以为你能欺骗一部分人，能在一段时间内欺骗他们，\n\n@ 翻译推文\n\n马：你抢了我的手机，强迫我不许报警。\n\n但你永远无法永远欺骗所有人。\n\n雁：我很喜欢马妹妹，她是一个很单纯的孩子。\n\n证物 B\n\n宣誓书\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州） )\n) 证明属实\nCOUNTY OF QUEENS（皇后县） )\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州） ) ) 证明属实： COUNTY OF QUEENS（皇后县） )\n\n我，Shenyi Glass，是受聘于 TransPerfect 的语言专家，该公司是一家同时具备 ISO 9001:2008 和 EN 15038:2006 认证的翻译服务机构。我讲中文普通话已有 50\n\n年。我持有纽约州法庭口译员和全美医疗\n\n以下文件据我所知及所信，是由中文至英文真实且准确的翻译：\n\n口译员认证。我研习普通话翻译已有 5 年。\n\n所附社交媒体帖文 TransPerfect Translations, Inc. 是一家在六大洲拥有 90 多处办事处的翻译机构，是\n\n翻译至上述语种对的领导者，其工作成果被全美及国际上的商业机构、政府\n\n机构及法院所认可。\n\nhenyi Glass，\n\n普通话口译员兼笔译员\n\nTransPerfect Translations, Inc. 确认，所提供的翻译是根据我们通过 ISO 9001:2015 和 ISO 17100:2015 认证的质量管理体系制作的，且负责\n\n专业翻译领域的领导者。TransPerfect Translations, Inc. 拥有二十多年的经验\n\n上述翻译的代理人具备翻译和审核上述语种对文件的资格，且与源文件中指名的任何当事人均无关联。\n\n于2019年8月7日（星期三）在我面前宣誓\n\n公证人签名\n\n公证人印章\n\n公证人印章\n\nNOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK 编号 01 SH6352366 资质注册于 Omos 县 佣金届满日期 12-2 1-26z6\n\n1. Xi Nuo（西诺）与 Xia Yeliang（夏业良）之间的对话\n\n西诺：Yu Yong（于泳）亲口跟我说，最惨的人是 Guo Mei（郭美）。\n\n夏业良：郭美住院的时候于泳陪着她呢是吧。另外还有他的儿子郭强好像也被他搞的……\n\n夏业良：郭美（郭文贵之女）住院期间，由于泳陪着她，对吧？另外，他的儿子 Mileson Kwok（郭强）似乎也被他搞垮了……\n\n西诺: 郭强的, 就变成成灰了呀。郭强的女朋友是一个很漂亮的模特, 郭文贵趁着郭强出差的时候对她进行性侵了。\n\n西诺：郭强已经变成这样一个可怜窝囊的人了。郭强的女朋友是一个非常漂亮的模特。郭文贵趁着郭强出差的时候对她进行了性侵。\n\n夏业良：有人说他乱伦……\n\n西诺：卷入乱伦的是王雁平。\n\n夏业良：王雁平是他（郭文贵）的侄媳妇。\n\n西诺: 侄媳妇。所以就是这么说的。这个人下三滥,兔子也不吃窝边草啊。\n\n西诺：侄媳妇。所以才说他下三滥。兔子还不吃窝边草呢。\n\n夏业良：而且他经常骂郭强，他录音里……\n\n夏业良：而且他经常骂郭强，在录音里，他……\n\n西诺：骂他是无能。郭强也是厌恶这个爹。为什么呢？你想想，哪个做爹的能把女儿儿子推到犯罪的第一线。你看看香港的那个案子里面，头一个起诉的不是郭文贵，是他女儿，还有他儿子。\n\n西诺：骂他无能。郭强也厌恶这个爹。为什么呢？你想想，哪个做父亲的能把亲生女儿儿子推到犯罪的第一线？看看香港的案件——第一个被起诉的从来都不是郭文贵，而总是他的女儿和他的儿子。\n\n夏业良：他的孩子们就是这样被毁掉的。虎毒还不食子呢（中国成语：天下父母皆爱其子）。\n\nFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/08/2019 06:22 PM INDEX NO. 157786/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/08/2019\n\n1513: RiflEAWBP, 5ARTR)JitRIE 805tW, TM19th$950 R)é R2MBff3WRMitaRBOAEARM$1%\n\n西诺：我们都有孩子。我们鼓励他们走正道，而不是做违法乱纪的事。而且我认为安徽人——Hu Shi（胡适）的故乡（中国东部省份）都非常重视教育。\n\nR1R: $E9744244&A? ftBOAM, EW atWEf)Rit, tett 夏业良：郭家有多少人被他毁了？他的八弟，当年警察去抓捕的时候……\n\n1513: $E1% EtPTitftA$tW, f&t1$f15†W800WP, 442% , RWMt1$ftWP, ERTR$27JR$0\n\n西诺：郭文贵当时做的是掐住了警察的脖子。他弟弟看到哥哥能掐住警察的脖子，就挥起菜刀砍了过去！\n\n夏业良：所以他被警察一枪击毙了。\n\n2. http (2:37-3:35) Rfff$2|jÈ GBSMedia\n\nWM14FE$895%\n\n+R41 AMEftiEAMWWit0\n\n18800R4157, 1574R3FT ARR, tT†ktkWMM00 it0tf 5, BAftRit, 5%i91f$0\n\nA 2009 fF#eRRA Guo Family $40 thiÄRGsR4XtEAftf f]E n$91004A0\n\nB#ttRRIf$4WehEtErnM$M$4, 24M$4, 24tft Aft 8tRMTT4 it002ERAR*45ttiMRtRWML\n\nf$95Xf t, XXX AFMrj@±int@$9mK$$pTAntW, itRRTAE it EAf$95X*W $149%, $457R*4tf4, %$itT$pit¤4?\n\n1821199, itRR Super nervous, RARET, RB842t$7R*15 tL 19951% ER $2, tt&R*45842710\n西诺：\n\n所以我来跟各位说一下今天上午庭审的情况。上午有三名证人接受讯问，第一个出庭作证的是王雁平。她今天穿着便服，看起来精神状态挺不错。律师问她代表谁以及为谁工作。她说她从2009年开始为郭氏家族工作，为该家族大约100人服务。此外，她说她的主要职责是为该家族进行调查研究、准备材料和文件。她在其他事情上没有决定权。她的意思是这些事情与她无关。律师随后问她是否知晓离岸公司 XXX 购买该栋大楼之事。她回答说不知道。然而，律师拿出一叠文件说：“这些文件全都是你签的字，你却对这些一无所知？”随后她支支吾吾地说自己超级紧张（Super nervous），已经把这些事情给忘了，请原谅她。所以很明显，她在这些事情上撒了谎。\n\n3. 推文：(2017/9/5)\n\nhtto\n\n![](_page_32_Picture_5.jpeg)\n\n-F'F8:46 - 201749M 5 El\n西诺：\n\n王雁平今天露面了，她的声音与过去录音中的声音很相似。应当可以确认这就是王雁平本人。王雁平今天否认了推特上发布的她与郭文贵发生性关系的录音属实。她甚至全盘否认了她与马蕊之间的录音对话是真实的。她对郭文贵涉嫌强奸一事根本没有表态。她强调自己已有18年中共党龄。她表达了对郭文贵爆料行动的支持。采访日期尚不明确，Der Spiegel（明镜周刊）未解释为何采访未在郭文贵住所进行。\n\n证物 C\n\n宣誓书\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州） )\nCOUNTY OF QUEENS（皇后县） ) 证明属实\n\nSTATE OF NEW YORK（纽约州） ) ) 证明属实： COUNTY OF QUEENS（皇后县） )\n\n我，Shenyi Glass，是受聘于 TransPerfect 的语言专家，该公司是一家同时具备 ISO 9001:2008 和 EN 15038:2006 认证的翻译服务机构。我讲中文普通话已有 50\n\n年。我持有纽约州法庭口译员和全美医疗\n\n以下文件据我所知及所信，是由中文至英文真实且准确的翻译：\n\n口译员认证。我研习普通话翻译已有 5 年。\n\n所附社交媒体帖文 TransPerfect Translations, Inc. 是一家在六大洲拥有 90 多处办事处的翻译机构，是\n\n翻译至上述语种对的领导者，其工作成果被全美及国际上的商业机构、政府\n\n机构及法院所认可。\n\nhenyi Glass，\n\n普通话口译员兼笔译员\n\nTransPerfect Translations, Inc.（全方位翻译公司）确认，所提供的译文系根据我方通过 ISO 9001:2015 及 ISO 17100:2015 认证的质量管理体系生成，并且负责\n\n专业翻译领域的领军者。TransPerfect Translations, Inc. 拥有二十多年的经验\n\n上述翻译的经办人员具备翻译和审校上述语种对文件的资质，且与源文件中指定的任何当事方均无亲属或关联关系。\n\n于 2019 年 8 月 7 日星期三在我面前宣誓\n\n签名，公证人\n\n印章，公证人\n\n印章，公证人\n\n纽约州公证人 编号 01SH6352366 具备奥莫斯县资格 我的公证授权于 2026 年 12 月 21 日到期\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · 7 月 20 日\n\n王燕平和韩春光只有举报郭文贵才能自保。\n\n朱万利 @wanli198964 · 7 月 20 日\n\n唐汉发推：据SV719反诉状，2018/1/6 当着Wallop夫人的面，王雁平笑着签署了本合同。Wallop夫人不认识汉字，王雁平也没有透露，她签的中文并不是她的名字，而是“韩春光”。这份合同落款是韩春光，这次签名与韩在其他证件上签名不一致，但是仔细观察还是能分辨出来。王雁平签字造假，谁给她的胆量？\n\n西撒哈拉大道 8701 号\n\n拉斯维加斯，内华达州 用 Google 文档打开\n\n分公司电话：+1-702-228-2591\n\n后续款项将支付至同一账户，除非双方另有书面协议。双方理解，客户可指示其他实体向承包商付款，且此类付款应被承包商视为令人满意的报酬。所有客户付款必须在收到发票后 5 个工作日内通过电汇方式送达承包商。\n\n双方均预期该合同可扩展至更多的调查研究对象。客户已明确表示，池中此类“鱼”可能多达 4000 条。显然，针对更大范围的谈判将在日后以书面形式达成协议。\n\n期限。本合同自签署之日起生效，为期三（3）年。任何一方均可提前 30 天以书面通知终止合同。\nFrench C. Wallop 签名 中文签名\nFrench C. Wallop，首席执行官\nStrategic-Vision US, LLC（战略愿景美国有限责任公司）\n日期：2018 年 1 月 6 日 日期：2018 年 1 月 6 日\n\n期限。本合同自签署之日起生效，为期三（3）年。任何一方均可通过书面通知终止合同。\n\n网址\n\n签名。谁给她的胆量？\n\n王燕平和韩春光只有举报郭文贵才能自保。\n\nFrench C. Wallop，首席执行官 战略愿景美国有限责任公司\n\n回复 12 转发 2 点赞 12\n\n唐汉发推：据 SV719 反诉状，王燕平在本案中于 2018 年 1 月 6 日当着 Wallop 夫人的面微笑着签署了合同。Wallop 夫人不认识汉字。王燕平未提及她签的中文名字不是\n\n她的名字，而是汉字“韩春光”。这份合同上的签名是“韩春光”，当然该签名与韩在其他文件上的签名不同。\n\n仔细观察细节即可辨别差异。王燕平伪造了\n\n燕平”\n\n签名。谁给她的胆量？\n\n她被郭\n\n在\n\n[图片：_page_36_Picture_2.jpeg]\n\n来自 youtube.com\n\n. .\n\n回复 7 转发 8 点赞 1\n\n[图表：_page_36_Figure_5.jpeg]\n\n支持郭文贵为强奸嫌疑人的新证据为：\n\n显示此推文串\n\n网址\n\n组织）\n\n文贵\n\n1. 国际刑警组织发出的红色通缉令（该组织的书面答复证明）\n\n2. 录像片段\n\n- 5\n\n支持郭文贵为强奸嫌疑人的新证据为：\n\n2. 郭文贵的女性员工声称被郭文贵强奸的视频片段\n\n3. 关于郭文贵出售其个人精子的广告\n\n1. 国际刑警组织发出的红色通缉令（该组织的书面答复证明）\n\n回复 40 转发 12 引用 19 点赞 77\n\n- 4. 郭文贵强奸并殴打王燕平的音频片段\n- 5. 郭文贵性侵一名男性的视频片段\n- 6. 郭文贵与两名女性吸毒的视频片段\n- 7. 关于郭文贵性侵其儿媳的新闻报道\n\n[图片：_page_37_Picture_6.jpeg]\n\n他 @sinofreedom 7 月 13 日\n\nyoutu.be/dGppXFIktxc?II... 发布于 2017 年 9 月 9 日\n\n[图片：_page_37_Picture_10.jpeg]\n\n. youtube.com\n\n[图片：_page_37_Picture_12.jpeg]\n\n显示此推文串\n\n网址\n\n4. 郭文贵性侵并殴打王燕平\n\n发布者：中文频道\n\n盘古老板郭文贵在办公室与女秘书王燕平发生性关系（第 8 季）\n\n纽约州法院电子化申报系统 文件编号 1 接收日期：2019 年 8 月 8 日\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · 7 月 13 日\n\n指控郭文贵为强奸犯的主要证据有三个:\n1, 美联社等16家西方媒体对郭文贵强奸女秘书的报道\n2, 马蕊在纽约法院状告郭文贵强奸的起诉书\n3, 长达1小时40分钟的郭文贵和王燕萍审问马蕊的音频资料\n\n加上新增加的7个证据, 总共10个证据。\n\n你觉得还不够吗?\n\n胖子 @d55IXPrNhhh1LWg · 7 月 13 日\n\n回复 @sinof\n\n如果Wang Yanping（王燕萍）想自保，唯一的办法就是去警察局报案，指控某人性侵。证据非常简单明确，有大量的\n\n为中共做间谍，\n\n她并不知情，一切都是由Guo Wengui（郭文贵）安排的。看来郭文贵是在用一份假合同来试探其追随者的忠诚度。如果真相被查明，\n\n针对Xi Nuo（西诺）的性侵证据，而郭文贵已悬赏数百万美元用于调查。西诺 @sinofreedom 4月30日\n\n他就会在法院起诉这些追随者。据了解，该合同的目的是为了获取\n\nH M IEVME S-RRWWWWWW, WW48TM ER84 a\n\nH $‡#WA.R45, $2, MMtE W •WRWW4 H-52 MS-4\n\n转推 9 引用 4 点赞 59 链接\n\n[图片]\n\n雇佣女秘书的钱？”燕萍回答说：“聪明\n\n秘书？”\n\n1E55588, -\n\n转推 30 引用 5 点赞 35 1\n\n链接 60?s=20\n西诺 @sinofreedom · 4月28日\n我在与王燕萍交谈中谈到一个逻辑问题：A非C，B非C，请问A等于B？燕萍一脸茫然。我继续解释，老共反郭，西诺反郭，请问老共等于西诺吗？燕萍不吱声。我再解释，我讨厌吃花椰菜，布什总统也讨厌吃花椰菜，西诺等于布什。燕萍笑了。\n\n显示此对话\n\n链接\n\n归档：纽约县巡回法院书记官 08/08/2019 下午 06:22 案号 157786/2019\n\n转推 9 引用 1 点赞 27 1 显示此对话 链接\n\n我在与王燕萍交谈时提出过一个逻辑问题：“A不是C，B不是C，那么A和B一样吗？”燕萍显得很困惑。我继续解释：“老共反对郭，西诺反对郭，那么老共等于西诺吗？”\n\n诺？”\n\n说：“燕萍，别再为难你自己了，\n\n燕萍保持沉默。我继续解释：“我讨厌吃花椰菜，布什总统也讨厌吃花椰菜，西诺就等于布什总统。”燕萍笑了。\n\n燕萍保持\n\n靠不住。”\n\n链接\n\n了，但我看得出她有自己的顾虑和进退两难的处境，无人可以 $RHe8515 95 NSW:5 TEMENT E tWEfe\n\n[图片]\nf - -NMies !\n\n转推 28 引用 10 点赞 79 链接\n\nE. 4W3T9 5 REE. Wf48 MeWWEnW-tetWe E\n\n-Eft±%14292 WR¾2tRWfRNME - M 55% > HMiEMB\n\nRA4RWE9]tA093-4RMMREE>5887tM RAT-\n\n出乎我的意料，我今天偶遇了王燕萍。她主动向我打招呼。我们是老相识。我和她聊了大约10分钟。我们聊了她的工作、她的\n\n昨天我和王燕萍道别时，我\n\n链接\n\n时间，回家与你的丈夫和孩子们团聚吧，老郭是靠不住的。”燕萍没有回应，但我看得出她有自己的顾虑和困境，无人可以\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom -\n\n倾诉。她也是个不幸的孩子。曾经一时糊涂！\n\n转推 35 引用 14 点赞 72\n\n4月26日\n\n家庭以及正在进行的诉讼。我们还聊了我们彼此都熟悉的人。王女士满面愁容。她头发没好好梳理，脸上\n\n[图片]\n\nJutVR$97. EWith49REi$3-. 20ff1IM200M5i;, igIV\n\nû$M. ERMNe$WfRW. 51%d VR7, 278778MM W. 11MinRK7, Ei REW5. leges, R2aaM7J30gRE\n\n[图片]\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · 2月21日\n\n转推 6 引用 2 点赞 22 1\n\n链接 根据王燕萍留下的音频证据，我们同时在澳大利亚和加拿大进行了两次独立且互不相关的声纹分析。分析结果\n\n显示，王燕萍接受Der Spiegel（明镜周刊）采访的音频文件与\n\n显示此对话\n\n链接\n\n给你间谍行动的资金？\n\n5% @sinofreedom . 2月21日\n\n王燕萍审讯Ma Rui（马蕊）的录音高度相似。\n\n2018$119978151 V-3T&M #digE , it EliWht. 18 Ef£¾R\n\n你在2018年1月指使王燕萍与T&M（T&M公司）签署合同，并继续\n\n跟踪Ling Wang（令完成）。这份合同的费用也是来自你的借款吗？谁会借\n\n转推 2 引用 1 点赞 15\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · 1月18日\n25, $RW1RiTFiM1Elit-WfM2 $MiPJ·E$.E@B@‡iR@$R, 5 E$E@EE 4‡Wi47522 mus, eAg eW Eagne EEP M9ER. BaME WW$‡mR92.E$ messwas AM5%JE9. W T$52M5E £ìiEMitE2 ? E†‡f ReR T WJ\n\n转推 3 引用 4 点赞 37 1 链接\n\n[图片]\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · 1月14日\n\nRPG\n\nIFf!\n\n针对Xia Yeliang（夏业良）和Li Hongkuan（李洪宽）的诉讼代理律师Daniel Watt（丹尼尔·沃特）已经申请撤诉。令人惊讶的是，丹尼尔向法院提交的郭文贵的确认函上，实际上签的是燕萍的笔迹。这在美国家诉讼中非常罕见。正规的做法应该是盖有公证人的印章和签名。难道骗子郭连2美元的公证费都要省吗？这个骗子真是愚蠢透顶！\n\n获悉郭文贵聘请的\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom · 1月14日\nRIEtWB14-'5®J VEM, MIEEEVMMRt$ . MRM10iuJsV200% D. 25857, 3-EVfiR$5, EE9iAe1853ttlit liiijitii. JEt$RR\n\nEE47EM@200%E013 B. WJ PENETR-EMARE7.\n\nbannedbook.org/bnews/guowengu...\n\nKRRsRWER, 200%am$-†AA Ag, gas Jm$Wm9Yr,\n\nE k$ @XiaYeliang · 1月13日\nW!ll WATM R $i$£fWGI)i]ìjl!E8254t$: l!If0ŒEV MASWARM H -‡E MM\n\n由推特账号RPG发布的录音并非伪造！\n\n转推 1 引用 8 点赞 31 1\n\n我记得当时我和Chen Xiaoping（陈小平）打赌，说如果王燕萍再次出镜接受采访，我就给他200美元。最终，我输了赌局。王燕萍不仅出镜了，她还承认自己当了18年的中共党员。\n\n随后，当我后来遇到陈小平并提出要把打赌输掉的200美元给他时，陈小平只是瞪着我然后走开了。不过，我并无恶意，（我）花\n\n200美元换来了一个真实的声音。随后我把这段声音送到加拿大进行分析。该\n\n天。”\n\n西诺 @sinofreedom - 2018年12月13日\nRW$tRRMM3857. MIM: RW W 57J M7J-Ran BARR 7. SEE?eW: 22. $2RREN1527. W:222 Ninfe-B1MA. MeM7? M: W2, WW\n-RM 2|kEfM 5, Ma (E) TRS57? W: SepRMS\n\n4, WM. 转推 12 引用 11 点赞 65 1 链接 617344?s=20\n郭文贵昨天发现他的鞋尖磨破了。他问王燕萍：\n\n“这双皮鞋花了我50,000美元，我才穿了没几天就破了！怎么回事？”燕萍回答说：“郭老板，你这几天垫脚尖垫得太多\n\n郭说：“我已经踮了很长时间脚尖了，那时候我的鞋都没破。为什么现在会破呢？”燕萍说：“郭老板，你非要在一双好鞋上刷三层油漆，牛皮能不破吗？”郭随后说：“不管你怎么说，听起来都有道理。”\n西诺 @sinofreedom . 2018年11月2日\n\nRMEMM , 4R MEB i]8e¾%-195†B, iMe5MMG-8 k$bRNR1, TMEd. TMMk±efe-EEV? MER REMO WM, MEVM, is WMM7M. RMMW MEE . P5. 588. -BE. 159, U-tfeENE125EE 4M?\n\n链接\n\n转推 18 引用 20 点赞 68 1\n\nHuang Hebian（黄河边）发布公告称，将在太平洋标准时间（PST）8点钟发布一项声明，\n\n内容涉及郭最后一位也是最受信任的女性下属背叛了他并不辞而别。\n\n郭——Qu Guojiao（屈国娇）、Yu Yong（于泳）、Yang Xinxin（杨欣欣）、马蕊和王燕萍。他们中是否有任何一个人\n\n不知道这位女士是否是王燕萍。她是郭最信任的管家。如果燕萍离开，郭的世界将崩塌一半。看看跟随骗子郭的那些人——","key_entities":["Guo","Wang Yanping","Kwok","Je","Yanping Wang","CCP","CIPA"],"ecf_references":[],"word_count":10616,"status":"published","published_at":"2023-06-05 00:00:00","created_at":"2023-06-05","updated_at":"2026-08-23 08:15:36"}