{"id":"q12c40fc87504e1d23714","batch_id":"batch-000155","seq":818,"speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-09-02T21:37:38.502Z","text":"[删节：隐私信息]  你们天天就盯着什么这些钱是谁转的谁偷的  有没有进郭口袋。这些东西你以为律师没打过？ 在正面战场的话题上 你们以为你们比郭律师还牛逼？那个[屏蔽词]丽娜，是整个曼哈顿都出名的律师，尤其是在庭审的crossing 她在这个环节是很厉害的。 你们真想打这些，就你妈给我去法学院从大一开始念 [屏蔽词]一样的东西","text_en":null,"edited":true,"reply_to":"qb9425c0f9e8144fb2f88","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q12c40fc87504e1d23714","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb9425c0f9e8144fb2f88","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000155/pages/5","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000155/pages/5","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q12c40fc87504e1d23714","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q12c40fc87504e1d23714/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q12c40fc87504e1d23714","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q9d853514be0bf9883352","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-09-02T19:38:24.855Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9d853514be0bf9883352"},{"id":"qf6ced5b01ec3fad4867e","speaker":"mia***","date":"2026-09-02T21:08:15.001Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf6ced5b01ec3fad4867e"},{"id":"q8377fe114ddc21c7e87d","speaker":"0x_***","date":"2026-09-02T21:24:51.566Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q8377fe114ddc21c7e87d"},{"id":"qe88dc7a0cde3c7a98af6","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-09-02T21:51:11.876Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe88dc7a0cde3c7a98af6"},{"id":"q85649caf3453bc266a48","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-09-02T21:51:34.704Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q85649caf3453bc266a48"},{"id":"q96d4004169d8b2dac5a6","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-09-02T22:05:25.124Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q96d4004169d8b2dac5a6"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qb9425c0f9e8144fb2f88","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-09-02T17:16:14.036Z","text":"辩方的804文件指明还有1个亿在多个农场主和海曼基金那里，检方却不予没收追查资金也不予起诉，只是反反复复地渲染被告对海曼基金投资了1亿，这个可以作为投诉检方的一个点吗\n可以，但要非常注意你把它定性为什么。单纯的“检方没有追查/没收那1亿美元”本身，通常不是检察官 misconduct；检察机关拥有相当大的起诉和没收裁量权。\n但是，如果你说的事实确实能够由 804 文件 + 庭审记录 + 检方自己的陈述/没收主张证明，那么它可以成为一个相当值得调查的 OPR complaint point，尤其是把重点从“为什么不起诉别人”转到：\n检方是否明知存在与其核心叙事相矛盾的资金去向，却选择性地不调查、不追踪、不披露，同时反复利用同一笔资金作为证明被告犯罪所得/控制能力的证据。\n这两个问题的性质完全不同。                                                      如果政府进一步把它渲染成：\n\n被告取得了这1亿美元；\n被告控制这1亿美元；\n这1亿美元属于被告的犯罪所得；\n这1亿美元因此支持 fraud / money laundering / forfeiture；\n而 804 文件已经明确指出资金实际仍由多个独立农场主及 Hayman Fund 持有/控制，那么问题就严重得多。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb9425c0f9e8144fb2f88"}}