{"id":"q228497c3af6c1facc7d6","batch_id":"batch-000033","seq":439,"speaker":"zha***","date":"2025-09-06T18:21:40.628Z","text":"看你这字里行间，好像不是重庆的吧。你是另外一位上庭的朋友吗？","edited":false,"reply_to":"q26f1906bc26d1daa5c9b","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q228497c3af6c1facc7d6","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q26f1906bc26d1daa5c9b","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000033","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000033","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q228497c3af6c1facc7d6","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q228497c3af6c1facc7d6/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q228497c3af6c1facc7d6","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qa918f02b7ec1d280413a","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-09-06T17:32:30.282Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa918f02b7ec1d280413a"},{"id":"qdcaf1c41d09f96a312bf","speaker":"rim***","date":"2025-09-06T17:33:12.002Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qdcaf1c41d09f96a312bf"},{"id":"qd38bfa36ba06fafd20ba","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-09-06T17:33:32.211Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd38bfa36ba06fafd20ba"},{"id":"q8900372b44048b564074","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-09-06T20:23:09.783Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q8900372b44048b564074"},{"id":"qd846ca1f7aab424142c1","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-09-06T21:23:45.168Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd846ca1f7aab424142c1"},{"id":"q548beaa93b4180f7065a","speaker":"chu***","date":"2025-09-06T21:48:59.554Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q548beaa93b4180f7065a"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q26f1906bc26d1daa5c9b","speaker":"ath***","date":"2025-09-06T10:25:05.774Z","text":"四、論點本人為無辜所有者：\n\n我的投資在2023年3月起訴書之前合法進行，證據見 [附件 A–C]，我不知情且未參與被告的指控犯罪行為。\n根據 18 U.S.C. § 983(d)，我符合無辜所有者資格，有權要求返還財產。\n\n先前受害人減免請願書無效：\n\n我於 [日期，若已知] 被聯盟農場誤導，提交了《受害人減免請願書》，誤以為這是保護權益的必要步驟（見附件 F：誤導陳述書）。\n我不認為自己被郭文貴詐騙，且不視自己為受害者。該請願書不反映我的真實立場，應被宣告無效，參考 United States v. Madoff 中投資者撤銷誤導性文件的案例。\n\n刑事沒收程序錯誤：\n\n缺乏通知：我未收到凍結或沒收的直接書面通知，違反 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)，類似 1MDB Civil Forfeiture Litigation 中的錯誤。\n過度凍結：政府未證明我的資產與犯罪所得相關，違反 21 U.S.C. § 853(c)，參考 United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Baer。\n缺乏透明度：政府未提供清晰的沒收資產清單（參考 ECF Nos. 382、388、395），阻礙我確認資產狀態。\n\n破產程序錯誤：\n\n缺乏通知：我未收到破產程序通知，違反 11 U.S.C. § 341。\n錯誤優先權：破產法院允許第三方索賠者優先於我的合法權益，忽視刑事沒收豁免（11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4)）。\n缺乏透明度：破產受託人未公開債權人清單或資產分配計劃，阻礙我保護權益。\n\n聯盟農場的角色：\n\nECF Nos. 382、388、395 將聯盟農場列為嫌疑共犯，但未起訴，顯示政府未能區分合法投資者資產與犯罪所得。\n聯盟農場誤導投資者提交《受害人減免請願書》，可能損害被告案件及我的權益。\n\n無其他索賠者擁有優先權：\n\n我的投資早於指控犯罪行為，證據見 [附件 A–C]，證明我的權益優先於破產案中的其他索賠者。\n\n不可挽回的損害：\n\n資產持續凍結造成財務損失，阻止我使用合法投資。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q26f1906bc26d1daa5c9b"}}