{"id":"q26b0ba01b6dbfeb75833","batch_id":"batch-000048","seq":832,"speaker":"him***","date":"2025-10-19T19:22:15.053Z","text":"不就是螺丝哥的522里说的吗？","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q5b09b2fa91fe582242cb","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q26b0ba01b6dbfeb75833","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q5b09b2fa91fe582242cb","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000048/pages/5","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000048/pages/5","notice":"这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q26b0ba01b6dbfeb75833","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q26b0ba01b6dbfeb75833/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q26b0ba01b6dbfeb75833","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q069f0464a9e82b60cab4","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-10-19T19:02:27.231Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q069f0464a9e82b60cab4"},{"id":"q730d81d749e08cc58b46","speaker":"hon***","date":"2025-10-19T19:04:26.551Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q730d81d749e08cc58b46"},{"id":"qc04b881997086a9d5193","speaker":"hon***","date":"2025-10-19T19:04:45.130Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc04b881997086a9d5193"},{"id":"qfc6e504542181ef5e30a","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-10-19T19:22:27.358Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qfc6e504542181ef5e30a"},{"id":"q65a086b96e2b7bc137d2","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-10-19T19:23:23.278Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q65a086b96e2b7bc137d2"},{"id":"q6b7330adda83236c1b06","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-10-19T19:24:49.298Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q6b7330adda83236c1b06"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q5b09b2fa91fe582242cb","speaker":"dom***","date":"2025-10-19T18:25:05.738Z","text":"这个“不当重叠”的荒谬之处在于：\n\n法律属性的根本冲突：一笔钱，不可能同时既是“被告通过欺诈手段从受害人那里非法获取的犯罪所得”（刑事逻辑），又是“被告合法欠债权人的债务”（破产逻辑）。这两种定性在法律上是互相排斥的。\n\n检方的“左右互搏”：\n\n检方在刑事法庭上，为了拒绝保释，曾激烈地指控郭文贵“鼓动这些人登记为债权人”的行为是“妨碍司法”，并暗示这些债权登记本身可能是“虚假或无根据的” 。\n\n但同时，检方又依赖于这个被自己质疑的群体，作为其构建“数千受害人”宏大叙事、证明犯罪规模的基础。检方等于是在说：“这群人既是我的关键证人（受害人），又是被告妨碍司法的工具（非法债权人）”。\n\nLuc Despins角色的“精神分裂”：\n\nLuc Despins在破产法庭上，必须坚称这些债权是合法的，才能证明他有权代表这些人去追讨郭先生的“隐匿资产”（包括基于“影子公司”理论追讨G系列资产）。\n\n但同时，他又与刑事检方密切合作 ，而检方的核心逻辑是这些人是“受害人”，其投入的钱是“犯罪所得”。这使得Luc的角色变得极其尴尬和自相矛盾。\n\n\nGTV无罪判决的“引爆”效应\n“GTV无罪”的裁决，更是将这个“不当重叠”的矛盾推向了极致：\n\n对债权人身份的打击：既然GTV无罪，那么基于GTV投资主张而登记的大量债权，其合法性基础就彻底动摇了。\n\n对受害人身份的打击：同样，如果这些人主要是GTV投资者，那么在刑事意义上，他们作为“GTV欺诈案受害人”的身份也不再成立。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q5b09b2fa91fe582242cb"}}