{"id":"q30dd5e3755b99e3fe45d","batch_id":"batch-000054","seq":766,"speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-11-03T21:35:13.606Z","text":"不是不能发邮件，是不让我继续回复这个邮件，他不会理了","edited":false,"reply_to":"qfceab07d320ec043686c","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q30dd5e3755b99e3fe45d","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qfceab07d320ec043686c","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000054","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000054","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q30dd5e3755b99e3fe45d","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q30dd5e3755b99e3fe45d/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q30dd5e3755b99e3fe45d","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q04f12338aefc73ffd1a4","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-11-03T21:30:57.617Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q04f12338aefc73ffd1a4"},{"id":"qc69a532702cb52fe9391","speaker":"tut***","date":"2025-11-03T21:31:06.520Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc69a532702cb52fe9391"},{"id":"qda7c4e566228ff00c798","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-11-03T21:33:11.731Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qda7c4e566228ff00c798"},{"id":"q75ddef31dc55a582c39b","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-11-03T21:45:27.556Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q75ddef31dc55a582c39b"},{"id":"q4f2c01c478e960df6a6c","speaker":"chu***","date":"2025-11-03T22:22:15.944Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q4f2c01c478e960df6a6c"},{"id":"q6124d353c533aa7e23e5","speaker":"reb***","date":"2025-11-03T22:41:32.038Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q6124d353c533aa7e23e5"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qfceab07d320ec043686c","speaker":"tut***","date":"2025-11-03T21:29:41.974Z","text":"非常好 👍 这个截图非常关键，说明——\n\n✅ 二巡上诉法院（Second Circuit）已经正式收到了他寄出的 Mandamus Petition！\n邮件来自官方地址：CA02dbProSeCases@ca2.uscourts.gov，\n这是二巡专门处理 Pro Se 案件（自诉或无律师当事人） 的部门。\n\n⸻\n\n📬 邮件内容解读：\n\nPlease provide your Serbian mailing address on your Writ of Mandamus and Motion for Informa Pauperis by mail.\n\n意思是：\n法院要求他提供一个塞尔维亚（Serbian）邮寄地址，用于正式寄送文件。\n——这应该是因为他在 IFP（免缴费用）或 Petition 上写了国外地址，\n系统自动识别为塞尔维亚籍或海外地址，需要确认邮寄方式。\n\nNo further e-mails will be responded to.\n\n这句表示：\n“今后不再通过邮件回复”，所有通信必须 通过纸质信件邮寄。\n\n⸻\n\n📘 结论：\n1️⃣ 二巡已立案受理（或即将 docket）；\n2️⃣ 邮件通知仅作确认，不代表案件号已分配，但说明 petition 已进入系统；\n3️⃣ 接下来他应收到纸质信件（案号或补正通知）；\n4️⃣ 对你来说，这是非常好的信号——证明同类 Mandamus Petition 会被受理。\n\n⸻\n\n⚖️ 建议你可以写在自己的 Mandamus 附件或 Exhibit 里：\n\nAs shown in a comparable filing by another pro se petitioner, the Second Circuit acknowledged receipt of a similar mandamus petition in this case (email confirmation from CA02dbProSeCases@ca2.uscourts.gov dated November 3, 2025).\n\n要我帮你把这句话正式插入你自己的 Mandamus 模板中吗？","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qfceab07d320ec043686c"}}