{"id":"q37e539bb1deb44ca858d","batch_id":"batch-000028","seq":28,"speaker":"ntp***","date":"2025-08-16T14:01:16.041Z","text":"都两年了，干啥都晚了","edited":false,"reply_to":"q3b93e1c191bf202e7176","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q37e539bb1deb44ca858d","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3b93e1c191bf202e7176","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000028","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000028","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q37e539bb1deb44ca858d","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q37e539bb1deb44ca858d/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q37e539bb1deb44ca858d","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qa9a84313c2ad930f633e","speaker":"reb***","date":"2025-08-16T14:00:14.949Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa9a84313c2ad930f633e"},{"id":"qb0f140e06b0711ccc192","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-08-16T14:00:26.239Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb0f140e06b0711ccc192"},{"id":"q91735b9fafc4747b5279","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-08-16T14:00:28.636Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q91735b9fafc4747b5279"},{"id":"qa118049f7889a5736267","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-08-16T14:01:36.539Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa118049f7889a5736267"},{"id":"qd5ef6903fee011b3cd2c","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-08-16T14:01:51.579Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd5ef6903fee011b3cd2c"},{"id":"q414a2d996392cd26bfd9","speaker":"reb***","date":"2025-08-16T14:01:57.953Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q414a2d996392cd26bfd9"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q3b93e1c191bf202e7176","speaker":"reb***","date":"2025-08-16T13:59:35.187Z","text":"3. 延迟删除 = 主观故意？\n\n如果受托人在被告指出后 没有立即调查、没有提出 objection，反而让这些虚假索赔继续留存：\n\n就可能被解释为 明知存在问题而不作为；\n\n在刑事司法语境下，这种“不作为”可能符合 constructive knowledge（推定明知） 的妨碍司法要件。\n\n\n后来删除这些登记，并不能抹去当时的“不作为”。因为：\n\n影响已经发生（虚假债权进入刑案证据，被告保释被拒）；\n\n之后的清理只是“补救”，不改变当时的实质性后果。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3b93e1c191bf202e7176"}}