{"id":"q383fcd47b8c4a9177dd9","batch_id":"batch-000062","seq":833,"speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-09T11:11:11.647Z","text":"rule60 包含切尼里面","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q9e981898f7dcea927e06","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q383fcd47b8c4a9177dd9","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9e981898f7dcea927e06","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/5","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000062/pages/5","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q383fcd47b8c4a9177dd9","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q383fcd47b8c4a9177dd9/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q383fcd47b8c4a9177dd9","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q841011fa1292e08f81b4","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-12-09T11:10:22.983Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q841011fa1292e08f81b4"},{"id":"q9e981898f7dcea927e06","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-09T11:10:25.682Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9e981898f7dcea927e06"},{"id":"q1d3c5d4c12549f18c4fc","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-12-09T11:11:02.741Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q1d3c5d4c12549f18c4fc"},{"id":"q91cb2810aa70db038a93","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-09T11:11:24.006Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q91cb2810aa70db038a93"},{"id":"q3cb9423524292ffe26f4","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-09T11:11:31.784Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3cb9423524292ffe26f4"},{"id":"qe2049dbb1f5d395d6b98","speaker":"him***","date":"2025-12-09T11:11:37.662Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe2049dbb1f5d395d6b98"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q9e981898f7dcea927e06","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-09T11:10:25.682Z","text":"Petitioner, pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to cease\n      suppressing his future filings, docket his submitted but undocketed motions, and rule on his\n      pending Rule 60(d)(3) motion. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the\n      mandamus petition is DENIED because Petitioner has not demonstrated that his right to the writ\n      is clear and indisputable, and that granting the writ is appropriate under the circumstances. See\n      Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for D.C., 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004).","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q9e981898f7dcea927e06"}}