{"id":"q636638457ad383f5708a","batch_id":"batch-000151","seq":7,"speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-08-24T20:42:24.886Z","text":"喜交所发的推荐盖尔的第一封信是23年7月6号","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q04eb19eb23b0e68eb2ea","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q636638457ad383f5708a","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q04eb19eb23b0e68eb2ea","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000151","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000151","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q636638457ad383f5708a","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q636638457ad383f5708a/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q636638457ad383f5708a","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q0a391fc6c9a33db798ab","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-08-24T20:19:15.949Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q0a391fc6c9a33db798ab"},{"id":"q6d1303eb828586dde7f5","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-08-24T20:21:46.714Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q6d1303eb828586dde7f5"},{"id":"qa5ee87dd53f12388c0db","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-08-24T20:36:19.798Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qa5ee87dd53f12388c0db"},{"id":"qb9468a9f4a3df3e0aef0","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-08-24T20:46:30.599Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qb9468a9f4a3df3e0aef0"},{"id":"q2b10a4b8ebf2188a951d","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-08-24T20:47:31.083Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2b10a4b8ebf2188a951d"},{"id":"qf4ab7915ea6855b7f8b7","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-08-24T20:52:32.961Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf4ab7915ea6855b7f8b7"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q04eb19eb23b0e68eb2ea","speaker":"roy***","date":"2026-08-24T19:57:02.314Z","text":"所以第一阶段非常明确：\n\nGeyer = 帮HEX客户对政府主张第三方财产。\n\n不是“替政府收集诈骗受害人”。\n\n4. 2024年1月5日，政府自己留下了一份特别有价值的文件：ECF 223。\n\nSDNY检方当时对Geyer非常不客气，直接告诉Torres法官：\n\nGeyer并不是刑事案任何party的律师，只是声称分别代表数千名HEX客户；政府甚至说，这些人的身份他似乎都不知道，有些可能根本没交流过。\n\n最值得你引用的是政府脚注的意思：\n\n“It is not clear who is directing Mr. Geyer.”\n\n而且政府继续说，看起来Geyer正在与 Himalaya Exchange closely working。\n\n这个特别适合你说的“此地无银三百两”方向，但建议不要写成阴谋结论。\n\n可以问：\n\n既然Geyer被宣传成投资人的“独立律师”，为什么连美国政府在2024年1月都公开向法院提出：到底是谁在指挥Geyer并不清楚，而且认为他与HEX合作密切？\n\n这个问题本身已经够重了。\n\n5. 然后角色开始发生明显变化。\n\n到 2024年11月25日 ECF 478，Geyer的文件已经不再单纯是最初的“HEX customers / third-party owners / Rule 41(g)”语言。\n\n这份文件开始把相关人员称为 victims/investors，范围还扩展到了：\n\nHimalaya Exchange、G Clubs、Farm Loan Program、GTV private placement，\n\n并且开始援引 CVRA 等受害者法律框架。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q04eb19eb23b0e68eb2ea"}}