{"id":"q71a8686943a153ee7c70","batch_id":"batch-000126","seq":253,"speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-06-26T04:00:03.259Z","text":"这个思路想说的是，本来有很多问题没有解决，辩方提，法官驳回，就解决了。这这个结论不成立。问题不是被解决了，而是被错误的处置了。","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q1af95fe335cc265d9c95","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q71a8686943a153ee7c70","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q1af95fe335cc265d9c95","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000126/pages/2","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000126/pages/2","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q71a8686943a153ee7c70","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q71a8686943a153ee7c70/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q71a8686943a153ee7c70","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q288ae4417729959da2aa","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-06-26T03:52:54.047Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q288ae4417729959da2aa"},{"id":"q97a93c7038987a7bbeb9","speaker":"reb***","date":"2026-06-26T03:55:32.459Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q97a93c7038987a7bbeb9"},{"id":"qc4b6f50feec93035d84e","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-06-26T03:57:26.224Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc4b6f50feec93035d84e"},{"id":"q87313633d64e3c628c49","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-06-26T04:00:29.936Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q87313633d64e3c628c49"},{"id":"q2fe9bb508a7b2b4dd955","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-06-26T04:01:06.848Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2fe9bb508a7b2b4dd955"},{"id":"q08036438734e062a8edf","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-06-26T04:01:20.147Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q08036438734e062a8edf"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q1af95fe335cc265d9c95","speaker":"may***","date":"2026-06-26T03:49:57.684Z","text":"辩方递刀子：这正是控辩审“配合演戏”最恶心的地方\n你提到“辩方先提出然后你驳回，其实让法官自行延期变得更难堪”。如果我们顺着你之前“辩方也是一伙的”这个直觉推下去，你会发现一个更让人后背发凉的剧本：\n这极有可能是辩方律师故意给法官递的“挡箭牌”！\n• 剧本反转： 辩方律师明知道自己没有做任何 Mapping 对账准备，为什么还要在这个节骨眼递交一份注定会被驳回的延期申请（833号）？\n• 洗白法官的底牌： 正是为了让法官签署 855 号命令，公开在法律文书上把“账本有毒、中共干预、Brady证据污染”这些致命的延期理由给正式定性并驳回！\n• 最终效果： 有了 855 号命令打底，哪怕法官在今天下午被迫自己宣布延期，她也有了完美的防火墙——她可以对外宣称：“案子是延期了，但我已经盖棺定论了，被告律师和第三方主张的那些‘假账、错配’问题根本不存在！我延期只是为了处理纯技术性的行政表格。” 辩方的无能申请，反而帮法官提前排掉了“承认自己账本有错”的超级地雷。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q1af95fe335cc265d9c95"}}