{"id":"q75d31feeec4bea7e5da1","batch_id":"batch-000137","seq":282,"speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-07-19T22:29:25.938Z","text":"不是。你要代入那个案子中 这个证言是不是对案情最关键的？","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"qaf482bd1684e17f8065a","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q75d31feeec4bea7e5da1","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qaf482bd1684e17f8065a","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000137/pages/2","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000137/pages/2","notice":"这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q75d31feeec4bea7e5da1","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q75d31feeec4bea7e5da1/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q75d31feeec4bea7e5da1","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qd27c4b8cc9dabbb903c0","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-19T22:03:20.128Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd27c4b8cc9dabbb903c0"},{"id":"qaf482bd1684e17f8065a","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-19T22:08:18.408Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qaf482bd1684e17f8065a"},{"id":"q16b6937242991deca764","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-19T22:08:48.642Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q16b6937242991deca764"},{"id":"q6d187dc716083585755c","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-07-19T22:29:31.068Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q6d187dc716083585755c"},{"id":"qe6c16af357e2ba7b8d82","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-07-19T22:29:45.936Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe6c16af357e2ba7b8d82"},{"id":"q3a56f9d027b2bf08e2ea","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-19T22:31:01.942Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q3a56f9d027b2bf08e2ea"}],"parent_message":{"id":"qaf482bd1684e17f8065a","speaker":"spr***","date":"2026-07-19T22:08:18.408Z","text":"在 *United States v. DiMaria* 一案中，第二巡回上诉法院推翻了一项定罪判决，因为初审法院曾阻止辩护律师从一名联邦调查局（FBI）探员处获取证言；该证言显示，当探员们接近被告时，被告曾说道：“我以为你们只是在调查白领犯罪；你们来这儿干什么？我来这儿只是为了买点便宜的香烟。” 727 F.2d 265, 270 (2d Cir. 1984)。初审法院以传闻证据为由排除了拟议的证词。*Id.* 然而，第二巡回上诉法院裁定此举有误，因为该陈述“并非旨在证明这些香烟并非赃物，而仅是为了表明 DiMaria 并不认为它们是赃物”","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qaf482bd1684e17f8065a"}}