{"id":"q830842a7de72f729e2c6","batch_id":"batch-000076","seq":837,"speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-02-07T08:16:42.025Z","text":"早就超期羁押了","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q1432e409f4507710d303","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q830842a7de72f729e2c6","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q1432e409f4507710d303","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000076/pages/5","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000076/pages/5","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q830842a7de72f729e2c6","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q830842a7de72f729e2c6/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q830842a7de72f729e2c6","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"q2fa73c894a0cc8345ac9","speaker":"kir***","date":"2026-02-07T08:08:09.121Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2fa73c894a0cc8345ac9"},{"id":"qd9ead15078c150d17d21","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-02-07T08:09:51.765Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd9ead15078c150d17d21"},{"id":"qf3af1dae47a88eb4f3e6","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-02-07T08:09:55.334Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qf3af1dae47a88eb4f3e6"},{"id":"q23cafd1ed263a9edda9a","speaker":"chu***","date":"2026-02-07T08:27:49.987Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q23cafd1ed263a9edda9a"},{"id":"qbd3d7063a416b1aae1e1","speaker":"ntp***","date":"2026-02-07T08:57:07.432Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qbd3d7063a416b1aae1e1"},{"id":"q27ca8e4e6017efc5860c","speaker":"joh***","date":"2026-02-07T09:03:15.799Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q27ca8e4e6017efc5860c"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q1432e409f4507710d303","speaker":"gun***","date":"2026-02-07T04:17:32.536Z","text":"•  最高法院判例（Barker v. Wingo 1972, Doggett v. United States 1992）：如果羈押時間過長 + 政府故意拖延 + 被告主張權利 + 被告受損（精神、經濟、辯護能力），法院必須考慮釋放，甚至撤銷指控。
→ 郭被捕於2023年3月15日，到現在2026年2月已經近3年。即使算上疫情、證據複雜、律師更換等“合理延期”，也早已超過速審法和憲法底線。\n\n1. 美國憲法與聯邦法律的鐵線\n•  第八修正案（Eighth Amendment）：禁止過度保釋和殘酷與不尋常的懲罰。長期羈押如果沒有充分理由，會被視為“懲罰性羈押”（punitive detention），違憲。\n•  第六修正案（Speedy Trial Clause）：被告有權在合理時間內接受快速審判。聯邦速審法（Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161）規定：起訴後70天內必須開庭審判（有例外，但需法院批准延期，且延期理由必須記錄在案）。","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q1432e409f4507710d303"}}