{"id":"q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","batch_id":"batch-000065","seq":212,"speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:39:10.266Z","text":"你把这段拿去翻译","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q2eb483b17e2977533977","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2eb483b17e2977533977","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000065","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000065","notice":"围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点，不等同于法院认定。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qd77b5f95e65b5b3a2c6e","speaker":"chu***","date":"2025-12-22T19:37:05.100Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd77b5f95e65b5b3a2c6e"},{"id":"qdf6db4842e495d6774b5","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:37:19.253Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qdf6db4842e495d6774b5"},{"id":"q2eb483b17e2977533977","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:39:02.357Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2eb483b17e2977533977"},{"id":"qc0957e4f9bacfafc23f3","speaker":"yyy***","date":"2025-12-22T19:40:21.410Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc0957e4f9bacfafc23f3"},{"id":"qe302e043bbf27406a901","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:43:10.340Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe302e043bbf27406a901"},{"id":"q027f8070f74711a64cfc","speaker":"chu***","date":"2025-12-22T19:44:56.939Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q027f8070f74711a64cfc"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q2eb483b17e2977533977","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:39:02.357Z","text":". Selective Docketing and Ignored Allegations of Judicial Bias\nIn Dkt. 507, Chunk Chyi raised a formal challenge alleging judicial bias.\nWhile the Court referenced Dkt. 507 in its subsequent Order 528, it\nprovided no substantive response, explanation, or ruling regarding the\nrecusal request. By ignoring these allegations, the Court deprived the filer\nof a fundamental procedural right to a fair and impartial tribunal, in violation\nof the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.\nMoreover, under the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, a judge\nmust avoid not only actual impropriety but also the appearance of\nimpropriety. The failure to address a recusal request—particularly when\nthe filer explicitly raises concerns about bias—creates a reasonable\nappearance that the proceedings may not be impartial. This selective\nconsideration undermines public confidence in the judiciary and\ncontaminates the procedural record, thereby impairing both ongoing and\nappellate review.","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2eb483b17e2977533977"}}