{"id":"q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","batch_id":"batch-000065","seq":212,"speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:39:10.266Z","text":"你把这段拿去翻译","text_en":null,"edited":false,"reply_to":"q2eb483b17e2977533977","reply_status":"available","has_attachment":false,"url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","reply_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2eb483b17e2977533977","reply_label":"查看被回复的发言（跨批次）","batch_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000065/pages/2","batch_canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/batches/batch-000065/pages/2","notice":"这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论，包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇，并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节，为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据，引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。","content_type":"discussion_message","canonical_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","markdown_url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc/markdown","json_url":"https://mubeitech.com/api/discussion-messages/q892144beb9b16ffbe0dc","surrounding_messages":[{"id":"qd77b5f95e65b5b3a2c6e","speaker":"chu***","date":"2025-12-22T19:37:05.100Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qd77b5f95e65b5b3a2c6e"},{"id":"qdf6db4842e495d6774b5","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:37:19.253Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qdf6db4842e495d6774b5"},{"id":"q2eb483b17e2977533977","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:39:02.357Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2eb483b17e2977533977"},{"id":"qc0957e4f9bacfafc23f3","speaker":"yyy***","date":"2025-12-22T19:40:21.410Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qc0957e4f9bacfafc23f3"},{"id":"qe302e043bbf27406a901","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:43:10.340Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/qe302e043bbf27406a901"},{"id":"q027f8070f74711a64cfc","speaker":"chu***","date":"2025-12-22T19:44:56.939Z","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q027f8070f74711a64cfc"}],"parent_message":{"id":"q2eb483b17e2977533977","speaker":"rui***","date":"2025-12-22T19:39:02.357Z","text":". Selective Docketing and Ignored Allegations of Judicial Bias\nIn Dkt. 507, Chunk Chyi raised a formal challenge alleging judicial bias.\nWhile the Court referenced Dkt. 507 in its subsequent Order 528, it\nprovided no substantive response, explanation, or ruling regarding the\nrecusal request. By ignoring these allegations, the Court deprived the filer\nof a fundamental procedural right to a fair and impartial tribunal, in violation\nof the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.\nMoreover, under the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, a judge\nmust avoid not only actual impropriety but also the appearance of\nimpropriety. The failure to address a recusal request—particularly when\nthe filer explicitly raises concerns about bias—creates a reasonable\nappearance that the proceedings may not be impartial. This selective\nconsideration undermines public confidence in the judiciary and\ncontaminates the procedural record, thereby impairing both ongoing and\nappellate review.","url":"https://mubeitech.com/discussions/messages/q2eb483b17e2977533977"}}